07-14-2003
AGENDA
COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT
. AGENCY
. 07/14/03
.'...., . .
AGENDA
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
July 14, 2003
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes: Special Meeting 03/24/03 and Regular Meeting 06/02/03
3. Approve Selection Committee ranking of respondents to the Request for Proposals
and Qualifications (RFP/Q) for the redevelopment of the Station Square Parking Lot
Site and authorize the negotiation of a development agreement with the top ranked
proposal.
4. Executive Director (Assistant City Manager) Verbal Reports
5. Other Business
6. Adjourn
Community Redevelopment 2003-0714
1
07/14/03
(I~....~
~~,
~~~J
r?~n~~~
--
COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPivlENT
AGENC'{
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Final Agenda Item #
Meeting Date:
eRA, 3 .
July 14, 2003
SUBJECT/RECOMMENDA TION:
Approve Selection Committee ranking of respondents to the Request for Proposals and Qualifications
(RFP/Q) for the redevelopment of the Station Square Parking Lot Site and authorize the negotiation of a
development agreement with the top ranked proposal,
dllO tnat the appropr\tlte officials be aulhollzed to eXt:l.:ute same.
SUMMARY:
On May 12, 2003, the CRA authorized the issuance of an RFP/Q to select a qualified
developer/development team to redevelop the Station Square Parking Lot site as a mixed-use infill
development. The CRA is making the site available for redevelopment as a catalyst for new urban
housing and professional office use in the Downtown core. The site is 35,968+/- square feet,
currently used as a public parking surface lot, and is owned by the CRA.
. Two developers: 1) The Beck Group and 2) Dayhoff, LLC, responded to the RfP/Q and
submitted proposals on 6/13/03.
. The Selection Committee met on 6/18/03 to review the proposals. In order to gather more
detailed background information on the firms' development experience and financial history,
the Selection Committee decided to interview both firms and subsequently rank the proposals.
. The selection of the development candidate will be based on four criteria, each having equal
weight: 1) Development qualifications; 2) financial capability of the development team; 3)
Economic benefit to the City of Clearwater; and 4) Merits of the conceptual development plan.
The major components of the preferred proposal will contain the following:
. Provision for public and private parking spaces;
. New retail storefronts and a restaurant fronting on Cleveland Street;
.. Provision of urban housing;
. Potential for including office space;
. Willingness to work with the City regarding urban design issues;
. Incorporation of proposed Streetscape design;
. Realistic development and construction schedule; and
. Negotiation of development incentives with the City/eRA.
Reviewed by:
Legal IJL
Budget NA
Purchasing NA
Risk Mgmt NA
Info Tech NA
Originating Dept: ~ (\p,)
Economic DevelopmE/'i\l and
HouslnQ
User Dept. /1..11>
Economic Developme~
Attach ments
1) Map
Costs
-0-
Total
Public Work~
DCM/ACM /2i::!?J
Other NA
Funding Source:
Capilal Irrprovemenl
Current Fiscal Year
Operating
Other
Submitted by: --D.'. At.
City Manager oeM ~
o Printed on recycled paper
2/98
Appropriation Code:
o None
Rev.
The selected proposal will be reviewed by the Community Development Board as a Comprehensive Infill application
for site and architectural design as well as review of the additional dwelling units allocated through the Public
Amenities Incentive Pool.
2
..--
N
I")
9 tL, ~
L[)
CD
'3^V
@
@
:J
"
~
c
~
.--
~
tv)
tv)
'3^ \j
IX)
Co
~
N
..--
N
I")
911.,
~
L[)
.n ;:Ju ~
o
(})
9tl.,
frlL
" 0
(()
CD
DOL .
n:::
9/79 .
(f)
0/79
b
..,
.....
i~l;{i;~'J~~.~j
..--
..-- 869
..--
;.,
II)
,,:,~,j::\:~;' .:'~ ~.'~:, "::. '; ~~.. ;1",:. ;~ '::'I~I"'::' '~f~ ~.~~t.:~~o'. . J..l~{~iz~,{.~t:r
",." 'L()' 0::" < 1"'<' , ',N''' "'i,.' ,
~~;;r~~t~<<,':-tr~~: t.i~ ... '. ~.;-Q: ,.~ r}
969- LLlt
N3a~V~
~ l'
to
N
n
in
.';~ ;~;~~J~:.,;~ttu~;(X)i~:. ~
8 ~ Zt9
",-.~
or- r---
or- ~
l"")
'0
"
.....
PI 909 :ri
009 ~
o
v
..-
't-
w
w
Ck:
.-
(f)
..--
Olr-lBsr
Lf) /789
089
'<:;j- 869
o?'c
o
z
<(
--.J
W
>
III
.J(~u~
961., Cs
..---
6tL
LIL N
StL
E:tl., IV)
ttl.,
~
LOL
tal., l.[)
90/
6/79
L/79 ..---
9/79
689 N
989 F")
889
t89 .q-
669
"Z9 L()
869
169 CD
619
919 f'-
en
10
('If
I")
t09
V
N
-.rl')
;rig
ci'
co
-
"0
m'o-4J
IS9 > E
0"- -4J
1"')0
..--"- C
kZ9J,1Il (
,n.Q
SELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING JUNE 23, 2003
STATION SQUARE PARKING LOT INFILL
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Respondents
Dayhoff, LLC
Beck Corporation
Selection Committee
Ralph Stone (I)
Mashid Arastch (2)
Pam Akin (3)
Gcri Campos (4)
Cyndi Tarapani (5)
Garry Brumback (6)
Reg Owens (7)
Ranking Criteria
Economic Benefit to ClearwaterNalue Added 25%
Development QualificationslExperience 25%
Financial Capability 25%
Development Proposal/Design 25%
Ranking
1
Committee Members
2 3 4 5
Total
6
7
Dayhoff, LLC
85% 85% 75% 70% 60% 65% 80% 5201700
Beck Corporation
90% 90% 85% 85% 70% 80% 90% 5901700
C-~3
~LLLLLL .
".." 1Il
SloO
<i!::glll
"'""as .~\Qb
~=8;!i:;;~
5
~
:J
o
'<;
...
~
~~
ZZ
:J:J
00
"...
i
:E
:;)
III
i
:E
I
LL ~
1Il U
~1lI~
~~~
-"'....
LLLL
1Il1ll
~.~
1lI1l1
~~
u;...:
n
LL
1Il
;!i(5-
-z
~~
d~ ~ ;J m
~l:!~ ~ ~~~ .~
~ ~~ M ~ 5 ~ ~ I~ ~
~~~[ ~ ~~~ ~~
~i*~ ~ ~~!f <tal
ff~g~~ ~~~ :J~~
~~
!~
EB
~
<t \1CO
~l
!.... ~
:J;
..,
I:
II
E
CI.
0
II ~
~ ~
II
Q ~
...
II I
..
It -
:t I
cr
lit
I:
0
.-
..,
It
..
lit
.
i
! ~ .
~ .~I!
:;;. .'~f~.~' ~ ~i i ~ i ...
tlt~_f;!M.J~_ -_ _ . . . . . . .~"~,'.~.l.t='&I&;'.."
3nN3AV J.SV3
~tj
~;
I-
w
w
~
I-
lit
c
~
:)
C
..a
~I
~~
lL
1lI1l11l1 ~
~II Ili
.,;...; II:
InNiAV NIOMV!)
'.
'.
ffi~
-D~
L~
:J;
...
c
u
E
A.
0
U
> -
u ;.
Q
~
u i
~ 8~
III Ii
:::s -
IT ~
en
c
0
.,
III
.,
en
1
I
I
I
GJ
>
~ ~ :
lU
lU ~
~~ II: II. ~
. ~ ... .
III : ~-
g Q
Z c:r
Ill( en
""
III C
> 0
III
"" .-
U ..
..
..
en
~l
~~
:);
B-
. ::
.
.
.
.
.
L~
::J;
888
~jfjf
"''''
lil;P~
j
:E
::;) ......'"
III ~~~
III
""
~ ~~~
~~~ ..,
C
1II
E
Q.
0
1II
> '"
1II ""
l- e I~
UI
UI 1II II
II: r.. .
I- ~ ~
III
:I
0 V
Z en
tC
"" c
UI
> 0
UI
"" ...
u ~
...
en
.'
EI
L~
::J~
I" u.
'"
6i~. ~
I-I'!l!; ~
'II'! ~
i ~i~ ~
::E
::;) z I::
en w z
0 0 ::;)
j ~~~ ~
~ ~
I:ii ~
Z7. ....
::;)<10 l-
e
GI
E
D-
o
GI
> 0
GI j;
l- e I~
III !
III II
a: ..
?- ft ~
VI
:I
Q CT
Z III
C
... e
III
> 0
III
II III ... ....
c c c c u ..
....
III
.'
.'
~~.Al... a a &..~.
....
c
t5 CII
E
~
~ D-
o z
! 0
CII ~
~
0 > w
i CII 0
~
Q ~b
~.
b
CII ...
'" .
'" Iii!..
It e
~ 0
a" i
en
c
. . 0
. .
....
It
.,
en
~~
..o~
L~
::J;
~ ~ ~ .~ ~ !l I i ... .~
~ ~ I i !
0
.~
... .
. .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --