The URL can be used to link to this page

11/16/2000ti{?t'.:yt•?:?..r:6 riie?s i ??y i . ? 'i',1:. ??''h; 7' - ? .r, .?..- .1, ? t.; .[ti 1 ?S?^4:.1.. •. •'?h .. :.tU la :'li •1'? `fr 1".`?' ? i . rr, t,• - 1?,.1: 21? ys.t.k ?. .1:' •rt ., .. r v .. .?i .. ; .,°,i, s, [t. ,1, •?,::.g•. ?' '?;S..z.? 'A?.. °,1 `; '1? y ' .. .f- f r. s ,1L?: la`s>' ??:es ':S.:?t., .; s5 S'. ??:'? ', t:' ;1#•, .. ? ? ;J? ° .. ? ,' ?i ?+p !!T,`ly Y.{ f? ^?1? .a.a'''!?' k YT° r r•', :?i fr?1. ? j.. '.' t tt?, it , 'a .yl. ' .;,.' '1.: • ?'4, ?1 .. , Sf i•'lf.. ..i ;'? S? ? ?:?•", f .. •?,?,.:.Il.:, E. _.; 'r ?P ?$:r? -r =c`F'"=.i•?:-r4.,?.?. .,i=:t)`-,,?-.:: k.:. .?.?:r ?1?i,?".{,`: ',yr F?.'ll >ta T uy?' elvf Gk, v61-s,. ?h. t?''?.... :f.'l P? j .=Y Ys.!:' ?.l ?,i r'35 Vii' ?'•1 !f'.:.? •IF , 7`r '(r'' '1. , %.i. ? ., r •? ?,,, ?;, r., i•:,- ?:e .i,..y' ,•?;, +? i , a. wi.': `^ • [.... :? ? K.. E.e;,,?.,y ife .•c. .E ? x ?,?' 'd::.?.l??b L• ?s'..?!! t r ? ' ?S'1 4??t ,x:{i?,f,'?s3 ) Lrgg{{?? ,lN .f ,li .?` -0 ?;, E.,,; ? r?. .t.3.., r?: i+zt. i?'?i ' s • -+'l?ir"? r.' ??cy., is `'i.'?' .ffi ??'' ? ':. e u,S, 1ir ?l.,.'? 14 ,'! ••??tt,,L Y?'?%r'S',' a « ??? '; `ry G+' a•'•- 1 ): ::, ?`?? iY`? \ .qi `+?'.'? f7„?`l -'?. .°•? '??? /? ,•,,12?'rq "t,y '; i ?. ?', w..l. F= ? t,rc. :'<i ;:.? t??:,°'' r.y, :rs,•{.,F ?7 ?. •i . ??+.'¢ ??? y?py.??'r {; °4 E yt' ?.'? F ''? ??,, ,t£ ,ii;-`"cw F,`/'/sz: CE}' _ ?? :1 ? ?slF, , ?` , ;r;?• ` ?r ::i r:' ? `.1' : ?. 'r ?'. , s , S'h';. . r-. , '-i. -,?:"Y. 7=4.'1 a.??'?1.. FY?•t .. T .\s ?}{ilS?l, 4 .? ?.1'? s b :f ^ie? ' k r,r ? b ?•1°I ° 0, ?i, ?? . } •'{1 I a 5.. }`...?'r t.. I1? e`? F t ?,.' :e . ,'r'c,`,??„ra, z a.,i'• :.:?wa'.?•. ???? L;.r. ??": ' x y 1.1? t>.?,?,y 1•,r . y' : MI' 'r i.- ` t.: 1 e-' ??'s? =y ? "1: d f >?i r.??'; ?:?'?'' ? )??? .. , t ???. Ea ..1'.k..Vf`',` ?•' .. ,.. r. .,. ,. 1f: .7 ?,1. '.7"' ?1'' .. ?I?. ?, ?k •, .. .f, ?'''-??? ?I?.)Sq: .1. ,'•I ? ? ; ' .. , ' - it ' ? r i 1' 1 ? i ' , - i ? ? ' .r ,. k ' i • 645 fti 'hrost3 4. ?^ ',k' r'!.i#pp?t Y '?'.k7 rS ??s?.K.•"?, "?•???''' n`Y?it' ?"s`. ti, xr '?}' '??:;'?• ", t. :i?,', 3•''r: i'. ,ire,':.' r r ?. . .?i?,.t P,J?>;iS r .'CIF' 3• t??, ?,'??'?,r?t;? } .t':.j?? :• i ??,. 'J.'?' ?•.?. '.r`33'r`r.:{,`[i'`'?'![:?•<•;? f=? '' . }s. ?,Y,t.?????.r?! ., 4•??.: '? ??.+.. CI .7 ,.?:`1? f+.l .. 3. y{: -?i' ?.?'• er r?; .E'.., ?°' «s.1,f' 'r.or.' .f; ? 3) j Ic, 1. 'a '1' i '?' r=?y i'?' ,.i" t: fS,?S, ?. 1 '. 1' i.v': :'3 4.._.a`..'•r ?,2?Sa, !i' eeI`!j' ,}.?•l.li r '?..: C:r, ?f .tr '!'5:,31.. i ii1''?• '1''1: ., `,- ••i ' sP,' :g S ?? v%..1'4 ?H t; ..t `',? `?'`t, ''1 • fp',. ? i:? ,•?i."> ` +' •',t' •l'.'. < ?`rp . =,.k. • „ i 1. `' ,?;tii .`f. ?: Nkf.?.i a{:? \?. ?'1L, .L ,?4, •?-5' F• ,+c.?r r1?, .J •je f- d•1. ,. y,?'.` .! Jtea 1 t fs. 'eQ,. `Jr. fY,. ..,a. sS?•o,'%7<•`r'. 'n'-•f .. 1t-?j'9F•t • ?'?...: fi?`.?'.3?'i": .. ? .. . ? 'i ,. 'r":r `'srs • ?; • "ri' r .. ? ' 1.>> C,1: Com-mi8s, ion 1 Meeti*ng, S71 , 11 - 16?00". •1 ,z r. note: 1 -13-00 Preliminary (worksession) Agenda, and paperwork that' was in package initially but then not continued onto Thursday's agenda is at the back of this agenda 'padk. f. 4 !1 • : 9• } 6v6 ! r t . ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING Thursday, November 16, 2000 - 6:00 P.M. - Commission Chambers 1. Invocation - Reverend Anton DeWet, Faith United Church of Christ. 2. Pledge of Allegiance - Mayor. 3.. Service Awards - 7 award presented. 4: Introductions and Awards - None. 5. Presentations a) Award to Ramada Limited from Beautification Committee - Given. 6. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting 1112100 - Approved as submitted. 7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda Jay Keves said the Clearwater Beach Association has unanimously requested the temporary parking on the Memorial Causeway be removed and restored to its original park-like setting. Sam Elliott alleged the City Attorney lied.at the August 3, August 17 and September 21, 2000, Commission meetings. The City Attorney said Mr. Elliott's comments. are the same as previously expressed and she had no further comment. PUBLIC HEARINGS Not Before 6:00 P.M. 8. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6600-00 - Vacating approx. 163' in length of a 30' wide unnamed r-o-w lying south of Druid Road, between Lake Ave. & Keystone Ave., subject to retaining westerly 10' as a drainage & utility easement (Van Raalte)(PW) ACTION: Approved. Ordinance passed 1st reading. 9. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6619-00, #6620-00 & #6621-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low & LMDR Zoning, '1407 Nursery Rd., Suncrest Terrace, Lot 11 (Michael & Linda Biros) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. 10. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6631-00, #6632-00 & #6633.00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential/Office Limited & Office Zoning, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 21.04 & 21.05 (Thomas Kelly & Michael A. Ciaramello) (PLD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. 11. Public Hearing & First Reacting Ords. #6616-00, #6697-00 & #6618-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban & LMDR Zoning, 2014 Poinsetta Ave., Brooklawn Sub., Blk 0, Lot 10 less E 5' for road r-o-w (Yanith Kheang 1 City)(PLD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. 11/16/00 1 12. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6622-00, #6623-00 & #6624-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential'Low & LMDR Zoning, 1708 E. El Trinidad Dr., Virginia Grave Terrace, Slk 2, Lot 3 (Christine L. & Irma N. Thacker Est. / City) (PLD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1 st reading. 13, Public Hearing & First Reading Ord s. #6625-00, #6626-00 & #6627-00 - Annexation (& j redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Suburban & LDR Zoning, 1880 McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 4-29-16, M&B 32.04 (RIC Properties Limited 1 City) (PLD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. 14. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6628-00. #6629-00 & #6630-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban & LMDR Zoning, 2071 Lantana Ave., Brooklawn Sub., 131k D, Lot 8 (James H. & Patricia C. Olson / City) WILD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. 15. Public Hearing & f=irst Reading Ords. #6614-00 & #6615-00 - Land Use Plan Amendment to Institutional & Institutional Zoning, 3070 Chesapeake Lane, Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 22.21 (City 1 First Baptist Church of Clearwater) (PLD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1st reading. Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances 16. Ord. #6634-00 - Relating to investment of temporary surplus moneys; amending Sec. 2.524 to provide for a change in the types of investments of City funds ACTION: Ordinance adopted. CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (items #17-28) - Approved as submitted. The following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually. 17. A roval of Purchases per Purchasing Memorandum: 1) Smith Fence Company, 2nd & Final renewal, fencing installed, 12/l/00-11/30/01, est. $125,000 (PR) 2) Jeffrey Knight Inc., 1st renewal of 2, gas mains & service lines installation, 111101-12131101, est. $585,000 (GAS) 3) Duval Ford, twenty 2001 Ford Crown Victoria police pursuit vehicles, replacements, $491,885; financing to be provided under City's Master Lease-Purchase Agreement (GS) 11/16/00 2 i S S I . 4) Bell Chevrolet, one 2001 Chevrolet Express 15 passenger van, replacement, $21,4B0; financing to be provided under City's Master Lease-Purchase Agreement (GS) 51 Verizon Florida, Inc., high bandwidth service, 11117100-9130101, est. $85,000 (IT) 18, Contract to Dames & Moore, additional soil remediation, 901-927 Cleveland Street (Parcel 8) owned by CRA, $89,500 (ED) 19. Non-Exclusive License Agreement with Nextel South Corp„ authorizing installation of telecommunications equipment upon West Water Tank, 1 780 Weston Dr., for initial term of 5 years commencing within 180 days of full execution of license agreement, granting Licensee option to extend for up to 3 additional terms of 5 years each, providing initial annual rent of $27,500 payable the 1 st of the month following commencement date, adjustable annually a maximum of 4% in conformity with CPI (IT) 20. Authorize extension of Countryside Library operating hours to include Sundays from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., beginning January 2001 (LIB) 21. Agreement with McNaughton Book Service, book leasing, not to exceed $17,037.30 (LIB) 22. Contract to GLE Construction Services, Inc., new airplane T-Hangars at Clearwater Airpark, $596,021.35; authorize 5 year loan from Central Insurance Fund at cash pool rate in the amount of $298,011 (MR) 23. Agreement with YWCA of Tampa Bay, interpretation 1 translation services, part of Hispanic Services Outreach Program, 111101-9130101, est. $45,350 (PD) 24. Establish new CIP titled E.C. Moore Fields 8 & 9, to be included in City's CIP for Fiscal Year 2001-2002, for total est. $530,000 MR) 25. Contract to Eveland Brothers, Inc., expansion of Countryside Community Recreation Center, $464,640; approve subsequent Change Order deduct in the amount $12,670, for net contract amount $451,970 (PR) 26. Work Order to Wade-Trim Consulting, Engineer-of-Record, engineering & planning services for Enclave Annexation Program, $67,395 (PLD) 27. Pinellas Planning Council - Reappoint Commissioner Hart for the term 1/1 /01 -12/31/02 (CLK) 28. Approve expenditure of $300,000 to acquire 2 parcels on Spencer Avenue for stormwater retention project and to settle civil action in Winkelmann, et al. v. City (CA) OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT 29. Agreement with FOP Supervisors for Fiscal Years 2000-2001, 2001-2002, & 2002-2003 MR) ACTION: Approved. 30. First Reading Ord. #6637-00 - creating new Art. IV of Ch. 28, providing regulations for users of City rights-of-way (PW) ACTION: Approved. Ordinance passed 1st reading. 31. (Cont. from 11/2/00) Agreement with Tampa Bay Water, reimbursement of funding for preliminary engineering for advanced water treatment facilities in cooperation with City, in the amount of $270,000; approve McKim & Creed Work Order for engineering services providing concurrent studies and technical oversight of advanced water treatment project, $369,000 (PW) ACTION: Approved. 1117 6100 3 n, F 32, , Provide direction to. staff re proposal for development of Marriott Seashell Beach Resort and parking garage ACTION: Work with Marriott team and identify issues and concerns; look at other development options; highlight aspects in beach by design that are related. Special Work Session to be scheduled prior to December 12'h Commission meeting, 33. Other Pending Matters - None. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS 34. Res. #00-46 - Declaring.those Non-Ad Valorem assessments established by Res. #95-70 as satisfied and released; providing for copy of this resolution to be forwarded to Property Appraiser, Tax Collector, and Florida Dept. of Revenue (re Sand Key) ACTION: Resolution adopted, 35. Other City Attorney Items The City Attorney said the Olympic Committee has requested the City write a letter stating that no major events will be held during the period that the Olympics are scheduled in 2012. Consensus was to draft a letter for the Commission's signature. 36. City Manager Verbal Reports - None. 37. Other Commission Action a) Filling vacancy in Seat 3 - Former Commissioner Ed Hooper nominated; motion failed. Mrs. Melanie Figurski nominated; motion failed. Further discussion at December Work Session. Au? ngst thanked Wynwoods Landing for invitation to block party. He attended the reopening of McMullen Tennis Complex and gave kudos to the Parks and Recreation Department for a job well done, The Folk Arts Festival went well. Christmas under the Oaks was a success. He recognized the John Paul 11 Polish/American Club's 5" anniversary. The Festival of Trees begins next week. He congratulated Clearwater Tornadoes and the Countryside Ladies' Cougar Volleyball Teams. He enjoyed the Ross Norton Appreciation Dinner. Johnson said the Fresh Produce at Martin Luther King Center was a worthwhile event. He enjoyed attending the Regency Oaks Annual Turner Award for Paramedics ceremony. 38. Adjournment - 8:45 p.m. r ,i 11/16/00 4 F Clearwater City Final Agenda Item tf Commission 11/13/00 Meeting Date: 11/16/oo Agenda Cover Memorandum SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: SERVICE AWARDS and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. II: SUMMARY: . The following employees be presented with service awards for their length of service in the employment of the City of Clearwater: BACKGROUND: Five Years Fifteen Years Thomas B. Robertson Gas Bonnie J, Cates Library Kelly A. Legg Information Tech. Michael G. Hancock Marine Regina M. Artus Legal Frank J. Youmans 'Parks & Rec Lula M. Brooks Parks & Rec Ten Years John A. Zegzdryn Police Mark G. Anyon Fire Beverly M. Verner Police Gregory J. Wolfe. Gas Larry Leffler Gas Twenty Years Lisa Perkins Gas James R. Centilli Fire ' Tom Wilson Gas Joellyn M. King Parks & Rec Ann H. Scheffer Library Wyatt F. Walker Public Utilities Craig R. Reeves Public Utilities Harry Williams Fire Reviewed by: originating Dept: Costs Legal NA Info Tech NA Human Resources Total Budget NA Public Works NA User Dept. Funding Source: Purchasing NA t]CM/ACM eapaiA hnPuavemeni Current Fiscal Year Risk Mgrnt NA Other NA Attachments Operagns Other Appropriation Code: Submittal by. 13 None City Manager rintod an rr+rvrIM ninrr RPV. 2IQs! Ciaarwetor Bent!h A9sneiat1Oht IhC P.O. Box 3 295 CLEARWATER REACH EL 33767 Clearwater City Commissioners Dear Sirs, R\-e- November 15,2000 The Clearwater Beach Association board of directors, by unanimous vote, requests that the "temporary" parking on Garden Memorial Causeway be removed and the area restored to its former park like setting. Thousands of dollars are spent yearly slaking Memorial Causeway the most attractive' area in Pinellas County. Millions have been spent to make the entrance to Clearwater Beach attractive. It is inexcusable to have the eyesore of a temporary parking lot in between. Years ago, the people of Clearwater Beach signed petitions and lobbied the City Commission to make the causeway a no parking area. With the exception of the well landscaped area just east of Island Estates entrance; this was so declared in an ordinance that passed unanimously. No parking on the Causeway became a city ordinance at that time. It has not been recinded since, therefore the parking lot on the west end of the Causeway was, and always has been, illegal. We urge you to take immediate steps to remedy this situation and reverse the illegal blight now spreading at the entrance to our community. Sincerely, resident Beach Association REvt:?I\IED OV I. (i 2006 ,oily CLERK DEPARTMENT • Clearwater City Commission work session Item . Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: 11/16100 SUR)ECTIRECOMMENDATION: Approve the applicant's request to vacate approximately 163 feet in length of a 30.0 foot wide, unnamed right-of-way lying South of Druid Road between Lake Avenue and Keystone Avenue, subject to retaining the westerly 10 feet as a drainage and utility easement and pass Ordinance Number 6600.00 on the first reading, (V2000-12 - Van Raalte) 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: « The 30 foot wide right-of-way serves no purpose for vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The applicant who resides at 1625 Druid Rd. E. has requested that the right-of-way be vacated to allow for the future construction of a detached residential garage. « The City has no existing utilities within the right-of-way. Public Works Administration is recommending the vacation of this portion of right-of-way, subject to retaining the westerly 10.0 feet as a drainage and utility easement. « Florida Power, GTE and GTE Media Ventures have no objections to the vacation request. Time Warner has no objection provided the westerly 10.0 feet is retained as a utility easement. RlaAewod by: Legal l3udo ?. NIA Purchasl ng NIA Risk Mgmt NIA Info Srvc N/A Publlc Works DCMIACM I' ? Other NIA Submitted by: City Manager ZY-Printed on w..Yded paper Originating Dept: Public Works Adn !telly .E O'Brien U wr Dept. NIA Attachments Ord. No. 8800-00 Location Map Costs NIA Total Funding Source: Current FY CI OP Other Appropriation Code: VACATION 2000-12 VAN RAALTE M ORDINANCE NO. 6600-00 AN ORDINANCE, OF THE CITY, OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, VACATING THE APPROXIMATELY 163 FEET IN LENGTH BY THIRTY-FEET IN WIDTH OF A RIGHT-OF- WAY LYING SOUTH OF DRUID ROAD AND ADJACENT TO THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF METES AND BOUNDS TRACT 43.07 SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST (1625 DRUID ROAD), SUBJECT TO A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHICH IS RETAINED OVER THE WESTERLY TEN FEET THEREOF; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, David G. VanRaalte owner of real property located in the City of Clearwater,' has requested that the City vacate the right-of-way depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that said right-of-way is not necessary -for municipal use and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF,THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following: The approximately 163 feet in length by thirty-feet in width of that unnamed right- of-way lying south of Druid Road and adjacent to the West property line of Metes and Bounds Tract 43.07 Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East (1625 Druid Road) is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater releases all of its right, title and interest thereto, except that the City of Clearwater hereby retains a drainage and utility easement over the westerly 10 feet of the described property for the installation and maintenance of any and all public utilities thereon. Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 1 Ordinance No. 6600.00 1q, f a$ • ? ? ? ??1 ? ? ? - . ? , v t i+Ng .i '31 ,'?i .` ri t,`? . ' ?y? ..[ ; ', .. 1 ; f? ( r . 3 •i.e.?? • ' ' `i ?l - , , f - J ', 'I, , ?$4f1' ?`?'fl ' , ' i ?'. •:' . 3r' ",',. ° '. .'", #. ?6 r r•?%? • ?ti '? ;i k 71 .? .. , ? f e r : S. : : Yt .o :I =1 r +?'Kw•ri•._a- .?a...:s."..- .. ... _ .,. • ?, .,y...oJ....° :?.: •^ .. .......... ...... .. "„ . ... . . .a ? .. wl }i PASSED ON-FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL f READING AND ADOPTED . ± Brian J. Aungst' Mayor-Commissioner i Approved as to form: Attest: a C. Hayman . Cynthia E. Goudeau a, Assistant City Attorney City, Clerk , EXHIBIT "A" Scv/e 1 " = 50' This is ao t, a survey .z 0 w 0 :D 2 Z 16 15 w Q 1?1W Vc7cG t1on Requested gy D w Appliccn t DRUID ROAD w z 0 w Y }A ON r? VAC2000-u .m 2OF6 7Cf-1?'-M %(A CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA -NIG VACATION REOUEST o?? h'? Dram r, VAN RAALTE rl ® PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION O. 4625 DRUID ROAD &Xra?t EIiGINEERING 00/09 /00 M do B TRACT 43/07 2078 i ? GearWater City Q7mmissioll Warkssssion Item #: - 4yenda Cbver N iiorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: November 16, 00 SU&8:T1fEOMMENDAMON: • Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendments for 1407 Nursery Road, Owners: Michael Biros & Linda Biros MOTION: APPROVE the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment and rezoning from County Residential Low to City Residential Low and Zoning Atlas Amendment from County Zoning District Residential, Single Family District (R-3) to City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) for 1407 Nursery Road (Lot 11, Suncrest Terrace) and PASS Ordinances No. 6619-00, 6620-00 & 6621-00 on first reading. (CC ANX 00-08-15). © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: This site is located at 1407 Nursery Road on the south side of Nursery Road, approximately 270 feet south of Seabreeze Street. The purpose of this voluntary annexation is to enable the applicant to receive City garbage collection service. The current use of the property is a single family residential and the site is approximately 0.17 acres in size. The City of Clearwater has been providing water service to the subject property since May 29, 1998, and the capacity continues to be available for this utility. The applicants are aware of the need and costs to extend the sanitary sewer line to their property. The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: • The proposed annexation will not have an adverse impact on public facilities and their level of service. • The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide Plan and the Community Development Code. • The proposed annexation is contiguous to existing municipal boundaries, represents a logical extension of the boundaries and does not create an enclave. Since the proposed annexation site is less than ten acres, the annexation will not require the review of the Pinellas Planning Council. Reviewed by: Originating De f Costs Legal Info Svc N/A PLANNING DEP Total (ECIM S UDOH Budget /A Public NIA User Dept, ?? Fund! ng Source: Works P Purchasing NIA DCM/ACM Current Cl FY Fisk Mgmt NIA Other Attachments OP ORDINANCES NO. 6619-00, Other 6620-00 & 6621-00 STAFF REPORT Submitted ley: City Manager © None Appropr iation Code: Printed on reevded nvrr ?lnR Rams •`,? yq':V•..3'';A..+.>.?•,a e?4,r?t ;'i :?;•'<s i..?•M,y ?? 1 •• • .. si .1 . ' .. . .. CC ANX 00-08-15 -.Michael & Linda Biros November 16, 2000 Page 2 The Planning Department determined that the proposed land use plan,amendment and zoning rezoning applications are consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning application are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • The potential range of uses and the specific proposed use are compatible with the surrounding area. • Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment. Pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement with Pinellas County, review by the Pinellas Planning Council will not be required for the plan amendment. j The Community Development Board reviewed these applications at their public hearing meeting of October 16, 2000 and recommended approval of all applications. I ORDINANCE NO. 6619-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL, ' PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NURSERY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET SOUTH OF SEABREEZE STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT 11, SUNCREST TERRACE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1407 NURSERY ROAD, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION: PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the.City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CtTY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: Lot 11, Suncrest Terrace, according to plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 72, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. (ANX 00-08-15) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6619-00 30 Yt S 1 s ? ° ? '?,rj' ,J?1 ?.?T: .72•': II, it Jt ts3 ',,t:' r i ! r - 'f,.lEMOId }s' .<.'' .rl?r' ''•:1?: 1? iS•. .r::i f''?.. y?r{.' '?ie•q••iir Ja?R _ _? I ?r, .--.. ?l-? I w ?.;.r'•••''' ?i. i' } •r• r'?IMr 'S'!: ? ' ,?. ?° r•••r"' `s' ''S'.1 ?ri ?l-y '} rr„• ti• :? tel: i'?j y!%?:?i'? '. i'1 '+ i:' 'M's ?t fl?'J'i ?'1,'i',Rl', ?I, ??'??'ii rr r` '? i ?.7;'..??7 '~•,?r, :'t'TI};i, r •.I..' ?L;r• ;'.?1` ?Q ,''` r.,ri,?y1? '+1pr7l? r f?i? 4Z ?- ,` I ?? .? " .'r'.? .. •••. .?i?. 'r'..'r•.r 1'j . ??.?. ., •', :, j •,'ri :f.l ' i :? •, J'r?..' r 1!r •A? .,l+..a,• Z C, ! -`1 .?.?._ `r ' ''»•.i rF.j?,:. .s i,.y ?'' •??':' '''?'?s xi: f'.e ?.'.1 r.'.l.f ;• tiY' S. f. '''".'''..?`''/;3' 46 _r•?. ?' r1•. i 1 `" C1' °?l I. y t ' ' ??t °. t?,',; ? 'ti .?d - , ~L,'Y 4rJ. t}•f?t '1`-•E?• r?' }I%Zq i'f 4? . sUAGEi/? 'i t ? 1 i .?. .,?,: .6. ?•i p,J ? i'I..T fs .? (Vi ice;. rn t h 1, ? ? ?' n JJ C i; ,.,t.', r.t y. yN •.r i,+tv •y . ?J.%'fhJJ i-;. 5?,? J 7r ?"`? ' .] n r? l 1 y ,: '? - •.Y i °'' '? t: ?vr .a 7, ?•.,I,,t, Swt Y.:t 1• y Y• i? lv ?,,}r•,/7. ? ? T ? 1 ?, ? •? M I..•_-?._ ?. .?• '.+.., r,i ...? j?•.: •.t i'. ,x'e,.?,r .;iT.•.:w ':1.."i•?.' s.??%?• ? ?rSl ar'itii L/1 ??•.-???? I, ?..•. ,?i,l, 'r r,:, r'ar it.{ s.t. 1rTtiU ,•„I i r•> h: ".r' r' 'r? :r ?`k..?rs'a'ri' . ,::1 `,:.f; ??4/ nor +i.;:: lug;. f SEABfiEE?? . t ,;'1,, /r tti •,,?r?;...Y? : ;?14.t~:; - _ --'' _ ? :3;: ;. t . I,',;.'_•.•A,1"' -.t?id?. ?';,'' r'!':.ra,., .__>„ ?7H .,,rJe, ter!, L; ?r :f ?? ?''.. r??' 4''Y'" • fir'- '? G }' a 45t3 1 , fr-o I,',;? 27 t:j I Ia?ifL? ` 1'11 ? ??r/ ?? '1 wa ? ~ ? I • • •.' r .!t • ?'J, . h ' •f, • ...^ "t j mot' :i: t,. M^ 1' .ti•. f ,Y:: c'}L' 4 ?M'r ' r+ . F'r i. ?! i,i •? ''T r ..?.'r. 4 '71 `]' •r 1 •; .le?'v' r L. .•? i'f`• ' J`''?t 'M ;:.':a,r '. q ? ?J. S?T.?,}' ,,?L' '?,?'T»+j, tyf ???,'i. 'SS`.•? %5 ,:%?T,.•, ?`•/y??r^? •i ??r?'`Y1s' '; • :'; 2?: ; r, IF; _. ' ;'i:. .: ' h++?; , ?;-25?? .,,,;,?? r{x`1.6~ .;, ••; ;:ti?n7'.s, is ? ;+a t r" ? C??° •x?,ra. t' :, 's•j? ?'? 1 : •f., '?-".., ?!k ?'??;FS+; t• '''? • ?S??rrn'. • .,?.. ?. :rV'rr?' of ?., .? , 'l+J:f'.G? a:?"';? .t.± W. Oki:; I . U 5 'A , c7 rryJCC \',i..,+, L ?f? S?„?.,... r ',?,. ,t?' , ,s C'? T^, ,1•'.5.' U{S??ER. •.•.+, j, •,,tt.,7.:. A 'h•ti • sr 4•?,'r<'Y dry \ \ r ?f '? `a ..# 'v, f r1t t J, I yir'.iiZ.??e:. •;fa,? '?•"T'( ?t /jf'1 ??lr F,? 12 \, •?? ••? ••ti .'s.a. ril '..T?J ,_?' r?,;'li f•w1',f?l. kY. •k .ir:1!,;'!? '1r+1.i'!.?i.''..:d,•?;`:4;44't.l'":; :?T'+ 0 Moo •a1f?r2'.;'t1 . It+, ?: ' '"{ :k?: ;,,t_t f'Ly-?? '{•-r.lz .. t. l,a a„: , e e . St r: - _.,-, ...•C'1 7. y ?1r]. ,.,. :•iCV .?' •'t67 y Ir` "'t{!.' .45 t?E4 jrrirr: / u N"T` i (?yy l .1L. Iv, . i.'.,.',•'?r• ., ?Jn7i ; , ;: 'l- .,.?. ?r .f?.y; [.. :l4 ?• liil"?? ,•3 •'•L, ,.,.. ; t.. 4•i .t?Y S•.! ?. M•6 '^"i ? i ? ??' ''' ? ? ' !,;I ?!? ?'",. ?, z• 1t...:j. nt'. J, r, .r ? r<•yy,, r r, +... ;{ 9?at?"+? .'.? y G• S s' ,? ,'r ,'.+ ?,( - ?] Q ?",,i?a?4j '';'1.:!''','' LY•t?" • ';""?+:EVx' „ ?F } .} ?? \ r' ? ,? Imo' ,.,.; ?::?_•, Ma'.{r,•4?1 ?'R l:J ?ri, ysy;??Yl:i r'}''L[i1i?' '.)y":,."''' ;:'7?:?''"'.i, .r??•. ``' nttJ'i ';Z; di? •. ae? t `• ? - ••--?"r .-? . y t, ???? r.. . • r. '?_'.'.?..=•cL k'•-' s -I'_1?Y=. i•.. r ?;f.;!?r rsd? .1J's;i 1 ?.• ! {• a,il' t s ,•°?. ` _ ?!' 'Ir R ?.,tJ G '( •?' + trT^. L Y''? - •^.• r Y1„i;:? : ti ,t. rsr t :r'? s 2nyt ? ?J. 01 i r-r:. ?s• ?t ' 1?t7,. > r b: }F, F. 1? .Yb 1:'4 t t?.?S ?? 110 ?? .\? , ?i 7, cis' ,• r }?1r') Y? .?;? ??. 5.?1 r ,.,{rk?S' ,•,, ?, _?..: t , ' Y f1?'''.?"a a 1 51 'q. 1. Ni' (: Gr j?'?:i, f.: nr1,{_ ?•??++•• ?f! ??.i?? / tt71 ''T,(? ? •? 1'4W1; `{t.L', 1(y/' {SIC l?Y i 1"Y? Z? 1 l It ?lV•.' " ..:T.?; .lrl fl, ~?r? ?? L Y/ Y?' i1N t:l:t'fht 1Y1'vf T ? i Li ?\ rj ?...? I.1? . ,' .. +? L.>_ 5 r.,. 7:;r L ?..•s +51} T1t ..+•r. ?..-.'??.! ... ?,iT? ?/4 :?? j•«{i.X, Er. ? „? f Ctt \ y ?r I ,,!• Rif+i:.•F.?' Y.s. ".'Cy ??[r? J'• "',i?fi ea4,' s• Li ?J r.5 f:: ,r.vi •r , " 'y ? 0 ` i.. •, ;Ci "'..4' t,''•? ?-,iJrtr•"•r'? ??` ? , ?./ ? +C,'F'...j t' : QrJ '? Ttt.ar r ?1,(i`.tc?,-` ?'• r . I'? , 1;,?,-{c t?jrp ?'' Stt? ?!r E„ r G r 'r r'},f.r??? ? h ?t7....;r' fr 7SL?r?'• :?", ??retil•s?'? ? ,ti i? r,''r, 3E'...•• v F'J?r?L't•P:•yv -ly •r.• .y' K L.:• J?-'rar llHa nM??r'4 ??,?•. •{ 11 J Ir, ,f k, `? ??i??y?i ?• 'jr? ?V / ? ~- 1:• •. .r ?,{w_ 4 ..4 + 5? .1/ '15 r.• 7..n.? •S::vR lk. N f=\?` \'?O •%•1 'iQa' s 4, S rx CZ^s^ ?, 1 N r f l\f %-1 r 1 d; . f7'' uY `? / } • :, '} rs ..vM1' yZ A \ a i ,, {.ar?.r. G .?, }?:f.w : ' •``n '?^s' , "rx ?:. :i4'' ?.F 7??v r?F?VI" t',j 1 ?? 4,11j '? y ? ;?.- '}i Jt?r?''3?r i:J? F{t?,/?'rT•'y?• ?.: ?r t 1'x,1 • ?':"+??., 4:T.? •IrM?Q?L~r7• ?h' ?J rll.???•,•A??' r?? ? ?L•?5.t+ r,?r 5 \ G1J? -c .S :.U.1 . .i., f `• 'aYkr r F: ''.fist, ;i:,..!•4!J jd .:kip tu:lr:A) f% t•'rr.,? '•t'r y, r t y. L Fn ?., , .:, : • r' . > i1.'?rl:a . _ •? J .r?, ;,?r r.?,: 3 1 !? mss;},{ f••. r s ?,.?? f: S'f` i h r. ti• L?•.. t •'' ?• -1 f' t•Zl , " 1 1 ?,`a7? Al}L'" r _??? t y.....r r, •.l >y;iy, l,r ' ,!'aa?leeJ ? C ?,?]'??? etl?? ?? 4?? [4? :,rr•+'; ,, }?+?" sr il, ? .:?;4 .>' ^}',{ ,.ty ?,#",? /' q L 1 ? s ?? a. rp? `I ? a b ' : ?' °' r'? ?f, ]? S?G-'.4' ?,,.,' '?d•.?? ?''+' I 4f? C,.. 19 ? ? ? IEr?' r -.i+ ?.r.. ,. 1::, .?%;i.r?• ? 'r}',, f , : J (1 tn? ?!; L• :q :?ri„s, ? r2i• t t! ? l4 :.`:?'•' ' w'• +.? ' f ?'?' <'< ,t.?$ q.? .?? + t i:!?,r.r r• ll't'''r 4 Y,' rr ,M?` ? 5 a ' 1 ?? ? '?. T ^,,•+ `4 ri "r,?' r: 1• q`a 7` ,.r.` i a- ?"a'' ;.? ?.? :" 15.. ? 4 °' " ^ ' i 1 / + y,.ti w:' €„'f•i.' _r tip r is ?t5 5 / , , !''J•:, :f; ., r.'' ?:, , r.. , .-. [r ,;? t: R?AL7: J": 77? i. '-'•`r 'l? "y-w- \ \ •3? ?? ,? 7''. C' , :'. 4 v'is n cV a )• / ?j M y ;fit:"l , ? tr : ? 7 ' 1101 / 1? `'4553 Ol a''12 Mir 30 } 6'F: i 5 I L?f' =ir CLE Kri ,'lA i=i2 wom, PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: lrllr,i7t7r'I ?ir'_ Linda ' - E case: ..._-_'1. - ADDRESS: I1. cr,c= ?::; - - -'-"- - _ --- _ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LAtVD USE PLAN ZONING FROM: PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.17 Right-o -way Size Acres: -ATLAS PAGE: - SEC: T'IVP: RAGE: - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: CITY COMMISSION: Exhibit A 01-dillance :Io. 6619-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6620-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NURSERY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY' 270 FEET SOUTH OF SEABREEZE STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT 11, SUNCREST TERRACE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1407 NURSERY ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL LOW; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWKiER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Pro a Land Use Category Lot 11, Suncrest Terrace, according to plat thereof as Residential Low Recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 72, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (ANX 00-08-15) Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6619-00, and subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: e X ?l Leslie K. Dougall-Side Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6620-00 F VCS' "r?? f i 3 Z1 r'_2t"-"2w a?• .ti: :N. 1, cv•? .ca :h "" ,. ..oa ??? ? ? rf _J?~ ._....._...? 1::' ,• _ •LENON ... ? .• . ,•. •'+.. r •'' .c??+•~ .r???r;?'; ``,; 1 ; r t _ ?? ii I I rTT ... v; r ,. a ;:' r r'. n' ' .• • n i'.. , ?t;; r}E -11.7 i6' w.l?' 4?:i.4`'' 'i•e; it lU L:i, .'7i'' -:C?'c''' Q .. -?f ?: :_?: :7 ` =+ '• ''„' ?, -:r'''??5 ?itsisriiifia"1. C-1 _ '2v. .ul rrI n ?? f •k,?l+.^ - ?, ? ? o n? b1?. ra r :q 'N as ti?•? :i• ?a .,.j.•6 F.r•,??•s. .o` V 1 r ?') } rrr.7 a 1 4 ?rA 4' :`r' :.?. :. 3F `4 :,??•, ?; , a,.: SCA6REZ,So ! a }_ ?"?,? ? J 1r.r: O 7, a - ` .w•• 7?..?.., T -+: .c;? { '1}.. f??iY:??'::t ti:t' ?:1"=?' •h".'..'Y< ?---r - t la7 j3 'y - ?.. 1 1 I I:? r-? ; r2' . ?,Fj: c ?:: !, ['G :J :':3 :...:i•Jt 1 r' 11 I,` ,1 .. `? r ? .. ? ,?., Q. ?., _Q -j nI :=.i a_1• .;1r.N' •,.? •:b'{' " '.?°,.t'S ? 8`'?.`,5 ?'•i''a t:;'?? ''i,a??.. y 7 1 ? , ? '-? E J ate. "_ ?. ''". y' tat,..,,: ?'1: ? -7 ;j ,Y•t; •:. ?Y:'rr.'?.,7, •..?. -l y?l . O? `,: aft ?Jf , ? .a" ! ? ? I ?'-'. .w •rt.' .r - ?? .? • :i r ?i a :r-r :^.: d ? •, .,t, l,ar,l ?tl, 'J,1. '` ? 1 - ;_ L "r.L;•:, .V ..•'r ,,.,. '.:;:.• •••?,J'•".C ^f: a'r,.?•? 'ir ?;'.+' .,. .r.. a. ..., I ,? /?, \ ??! I • :' : _i a:. . i 1, •i::•'!•. .i: • is... ??;.: '..?1Z ?...::i a err>};??: '*a,:r:'•1??• $+?. ,r,'t-a.?:.L,,.. ?S •. ...n'?,,_;!R I'.•t{..,c7 f,c?. itif7i•?il r•`?I;at'?C1,ii ? .% ? j ^•?•:,y 11 ', x:j1`Q.a,: ."'!JY4;^?a. r, { ri?«"?•'T: 'r .d••T- ': ?r? 'x.4^: 4'.w •fM1}?•I: `tea'. 'ri ? ..? i I 'r1..:a,-..;•. ,...e:•. _:'j'? r •.. •?'y.w a,;:7•' ,a7. t`a,?7='a^i ti?r'..? ,t'ti: ',y. ,w.jr•• r. ', u :..': :,?g ? i ?.'? 4 '3' its:,- • ?,,?'• /,,' ` ?` ? ! -. .'? 1• ?' ? '*!R# ., r1.a ?r, T?•. •, i;r.# ;,i,. :; 1;, !?• ?:,?:•_ ?' y R ST". .j0S ,1:: ' :< s" 4 i err': `rte 1.1 f „? pf? •nl? j:fr.: !.r'.' ! i , "P' ,.[ ?' %r?}• s t I - ':a?+• ,sr }.,; t t?C?:.'1iL'1%''FF' •?;=, ?? :??'. .r•y??' hp??'• •E rGtii;?f '??s' I; i ?Q y' r .r .? err. ;.1':., ,,.. s '?:. ,'?,.: ? •? . d ••', 1 rry ?f A?? 1Q '? \1 1 ? ?'. .C! ?.:f: 'y : M ?,`. ...?L i f • 1.,. o: ?..F : • ? ? ? f..G ^JY''?t, ?, :-?' [?\ 6 G \ 7 : C,•':: iu... ,T' ;o.:. :::.; ?"-'C..: `?•; r, ,, bl:,. ::v S ~ i. ^t 4:,,:„x..?Gi' {.r,.. ?\ • ?4 a, 1 '.::? :.i!e ' Ya. r-+p• .?... •?r,h;Z'..N': Nia ti. cyr: .ii ? 'l/'L!••y r •, a t ?' } 7 C7 '?,`? / t •y?:s .r".. fo?v..?.,' A,.r?.'?rf>?''?rr.? -•+r. ?, .,,?•'.rt ??• }•... ey :?J,'1•F ". :iz;`d ?i t, -r- t' "p:'?t ?lv_; '~ ? G + ? y?? } .?. w ,. ?rr.riNr?? S a.' ti . t ::;',,:>. ?. •7r?1'. r-in:!? .„j.,. :'.?!"/-:':,.:: ;?: ` \ y? ;., .:• _'1'a,isk:'.;i'.,'=,Scir (: ?:'sJ..? :'? . c r, ?K• ? •.:` Q ?j?/f ? } rti:?. [.y,r•''' r. "PM::t.9'yt._li'h:;,- f -r r;.-:? , r 7?:t Y..t-: ?` \ \ ? / ? 1, ?©S 4Tr J' ? i ?..':r '? •r 1,. •?:'?~ t:'Y.'?l L ?• ?. ?`'Y Z r•r.e ? ,^ ? ?l iy ?,?:?''??''-?%,:':. 1:'C... F'::A. _.: r:.r. ?'?? ...y?:rF,:?atr.: ..>Y',•'? ??'?: ":?" :i. :j.'?'"?'ai i ?y \ la" ??L? ;s :r.;; .ta.:'c:,,•1i,+;"'r:* :.r. `r.,; r., ,n ".," o-," , r.;.. tr, r ?y; },; .,; •ay?': L?'?:?<<?• l„Le-• "G?y, :tom}:. is '??•.;:W •F•,.;..N C;. ?7? ,i`3•. F, le• .?rri *t'? Y?Elf ti. frrti ,i??l,l ? .} ' , ; -? ` 1? 2 ' , -. i? • "••r '?'' ' ? _y •'? 1;'r• r ';' ?.?'.S. •TM1.frFr ??\l,r.{? 1+ ti:' ,~ ? '_I ? 6\. ?•? .•: L'' '.i .3 !,C?+ a?',.-? .?? 5:.? r•jt- •? ' ? : , t,?.f•7,?;5 i,.Y '?? 1 V1'•--- ?... it Sif•. w,.i. ..h,f" - 3•,:e'-; r.i. J 9y \ ?? \ I: '-. :is i +.'''i= ?]'.??.? y,?;. S.Sa ,?r ? ..+J?1 ,.?••r.,.•• ?. sn h. l i,a ? i ",; ;icy}?rt E!r s ,,, f.'?1,?5; .(Cii':..S.r ?' -?' .:?,Ir; ?+r'7 :?';;;1.:"? •';?c? - ? '? i' ? t ('/ ? ?• ' L•.i ;?-.F.'?-t;i t*'.- ! • rt'.i?:r€'•`•'>?? ,y ?:'j'%? `4j?? Y'..-ri. '',1?'? !a:il?•??: ,ii ?? i < \ o o•'. .." •.'•? ;'r°" '.:.. Y r' ?'.: i• „ • . .•t[sc flty.y ?? .. <b• 1 U'a ?? '.? ?3 ? ? 1?. ` k?.r7 f, ir,* ,L- ,.??.- ..t'r'ti',•'? .?> o; i' ;;. t;?g.'c? ?:-.r'•o•' r?r,: ,o?`« \ 1h1 r ? ?-? O ? f :'i:f:': ;s. r,.:yr.i- s. ti•C ? .? Y„ ,. S ?r?lr ? // ? 1` J .?'? .`'? ? "'-:d,e?=rl' .,•f.J .. .? ,t^'-:.' _,y'.'':: #_"irrrlr.+. ?. :-J+r`IS;. ., ?- ? ? ,- .1 _ \ Sri ' ?a':r; ':?ErG'AL+?.r?ra,?'' ?;• ,:._? ..:,,• .,?; e >a.,1,•?' ? ? ,'. ROA[3:i1•'. S'1 t1a? '? 45 \ ?? ?-?_- .t_ ?r,..?._.; yam!„ .•y 't.• ;: •;: l.J., ? ?i''!f, ? ;.. 2 2 2 3 PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION 0WlIER: _ • _ _ Case;- ADDRESS: P90P_=- T'( _DESCRIPTIQf14:.- .-- LAND USE PLAN =O\IIIVG FROM: :v - PROPERTY SIZE .ACRES'-- -- J. .7 Right-of - way Size ra:r.3: ?ATt-AS PAGE- = SE0: 7'N P: _:. R MG E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: CITY GONIIItIISS10i'l1: ordfiv llco No. 6620-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6621-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NURSERY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET SOUTH OF SEABREEZE STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT 11, SUNCREST TERRACE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1407 NURSERY ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR ); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, Is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Property Zoning District Lot 11, Suncrest Terrace, according to plat thereof Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) As recorded IN Plat Book 35, Page 72, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (ANX 00-08-15) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6619-00. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL. READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sidds Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6621-00 0 .2 1 2 r , 7 :') ?w S,??l L 1 ru , 1 _ i ' `7,, Q7 e? t? • O I ?.r •c:.:;i , N. ?fQ r-eY -?''•; q; ,i s'? ?a j O : r S , f.13J .., ' ti . } .4. ., ,? •N : 'w • M? -'' .xh ••:: tr] f j.(15?? '? I,?- _ r'. ti•'•t•' '?. w ti• ,Y i,s.. i4 1.,z LEMOR 71 1?2 ?. y r' 4 •'''•rl:: ' •} r? ,f ti 'r' •? •r'. S.ry r 4: 1 - ?- ti .. Will r-+^ %? z; •? r! :? ??.7 ??fC7 ,??.?rF'; •,?. .1?. 1V ? r w:G•1 :'?{?. l' `.? r= 1 ??r ; O .:?t» va2?„.rf:.7`i ;rl,• `., .`2 J. 7 r y 1•: ?t:r. ; ?' s`unrfpF4 ;i tt' ! ?'? I r L: ` - LC'' 'm •• ety ', • .+.v .4 4- 2:'ti: . L8r • ::29: , r (") .? { 'r '? _ I ?i ? I' I ,t,;' ? 4- ?,r .? cy 'rV r ? ;7:.::q, .? jet: d Q =?••??',i, • 6' EAl r.5a ? a, ? _-° I I _ _?:. :''• '"i. -"' •t':'ri,r,L?•'.,:t-:F; .':,a?.=;i^;:,Y,'y`,,;.::I .??r?? i 1 .r., •.-•? .y «..' •v), .', ?..?' -rte ,r . .' •:: tJ.' Y.j'. { f?^!.-r'?" ??_ ? '? 1J•J:•j?i r'^ 9•, ?7'. v.,'r••. pt. ,?5`?.. •.M:,•• 'ri' .Ya'i T'?^•:;' .;5. .. J. •1 i 'J .yi ?? ?il ? ti i I ? .? i ? J._ '; I:.? },--. ?' -r O - `' ?, .•r. ,?Fh' tS•••',':r,i '•?'..??p!!,.: ?'. ;:jy ? •µ??;?,f ?1•6',5,-}• ^'?:=•;r; {?• '•s :'?i:?:`. ':?,li•i ?,, •.1?u?_ ?•1?~;ii ?'tr, :r•.t? r; 4.1'1 t 'ti ..:t. .N 1 :n - :.'+4i' - f1.`f ti. l' g... :ry.,Y't' +`{i.': '?'Y•?••_• ?CL 5 ! •,. ?I'_ 1 y. ::,;' r:.e lis:','r:;'41 SF 'Yv:d;;ti?;?rc ?, ?r'!. ?,.: :?' '\ SV1 ?• S ?.i? 1y ?' 1 'j `r ' .•-,: ,r •'i :, '. Y'.ti"?,.Y.'-.s:. ?rJ'"?,. ?; ~.• }'?'` ,?,i'?{; •S '.II??jR r `\ ?\41 `? q ` ',3? 0 a L. r.•,r ,' '+.• ... .,r.{s+a: ^..r,awr? yt. .?L: .i•i' i"'?~ `l.4.. • •'a. a G `? ?? URS?R.Y'•;''c"r4%..?,.-':- „s ...?4''r„ yROAD., ', •i; ,try I:.'f;%•' - / ' /^ :7?' ?? I 'e..'ri ..r;' .;.:j.;.;- - ..•2. - 'r".'(= a ..,. 1 \ ? i n ":?`„ .i/.., a.'?.5 ;,?.':?.1 ti. .i,S r?L.`. r!..=(? Ye4.'??.r; .': •.;:. r.•'? .:1i.? ?3. F•?i?:1 ,^ lrr:t;?? ,, ,? \ .? ? 1 ? 1 i' ,..:irl ».y.M1Y1•:Q }: 1?, ., r, i?j....., r S? ?_ ,:rc??3.S•Y- 1aS7 ?'a`•T ' ?i !•iE:,.?'.? 'J ,., S S \? j7 _ ;.r':: `'.. :4 y rs :t$r, :[.1't•+?t •?! .,; '.•; ir' •'t iy?~+: .?.' L}a:,.t qt;2, f ',,7 1 r la•f :?•YR i t, ii?l;"7 ti1`` K''^..« .S •J r' ?w. ?(• \ `'` ` J.7aS ?,. ? ati'}'°1i-?.•. •.;:;"?•-.i ,P?t:,: ??% l:Ji..,: ?,' ?',iFS ;. «r:i?s t•!. FwZr? 'u? t +', 'i ?`.'. }:5 w :;?.a`. ?- 4 \`'' , r?i . ? - ?-"l:?Ul': tf7'-1'ii•?rc :ilk=.f ?-• ::F ?r(?i.,.? •.1f •• E. .:i.x.• : ?'.1 r.? .`,{?c.. ??'J'ilc?I"?,`'. r, 'i ??li ?:? 7 {-? ..}: ' at1,.. ..' .1?ia'` ? '?ii?e; ..,..T,.?.$ • .?," ?:,•:l'1 ?t.?? t E-4 tya \ 5 ?' 1 ,r^. '] j -q•.f.• :? vsrrw.•r.. ?..'.i-, ?;"::r'rt"a''y~r :•j0l-. 'gF11..t;1. [.r i -.'r- L •i.0 i.. r.: f. 'rt': .5•E t4 :' N " .-y ??S! {n ?, t /? Iw .? +'?fi;..'w. .Y: y+?i••t• `R:'• '.`7'4 .y C 4 ?•r?. Y''s'i?"'b f? 15 ?,? r \ J 1 ? `.'- r:•r...+.; ti.:C,?- ?...? ....:.4q:K. :t711 ?..;•F4,i'?",'`. ira:.T.?????"„'+•.,?.?.?::+`•% ed v, S ?-,,r??-'-._ ' '.. •? h ?, ;. 4" Jyrl ?.. i`-: t:l?k.:t ?[ Yr.? X.?:j:.}•1 I 1 :Q rt. _: ? .f qt?C 1 f' i•.L' n `l. .L.i ,?. I'( ?:. s+\h?J ??G:ti 'i i.+ SriA?' e.. i'1,? i?`'{? a, r.? ??,• . ? ••r,Y Sir; l•:?r -:.t ???? L,,i Y?`i ??? ?,. Lc;>.r!'ts3 J11 I ir, :.? a• :,..r 'd it ? 'li-:+1?.••"s -,??, : n,.;a,,„; ? ? r• •.r,.t. , . •,.-,•ti?f1.,?:1,R,'i:rya ',t9 ? ?•'.C.y SLe'11:'j,^i,? L:ti.•.r`r%:. 1.-,t4:N ?i NM,I'1 r„j.1?-i,+`'•?`7Cir?(S:_?`ni''i1C?i,.;q+z+,l \' ?.. .'._'::?: ?-'i i{ . ;? y :l.,?rt i' r t' tr r• r e , ; :r? 4{ •ri. ' /,. ??": ,.,,,r }: y v r.Y. M•.. f' -?t'.1. ?.: !?••{.'4. F? \Yi ,i yJ? ;5' i:'?.. =30;4;. ," r. 'ti•a J ?, r,. 'J ` S ; /}?\ ? ?IS ? _6ty. ??? :7_.S ://?yy',j`?• ,L?j3 , C: nn l•,,• ,'.•'•,f' 1J; ',;(;. f-r?^Y?t ?;? , ;.y9, 1".?._ ? -1. . ,\ _? I.f`rt .i5'?......fl•.' .'i"1. ?,[f??.i „'i..'.i .- .. '1 ?•Ji: ??, „'.Xa l,f 3. .rw•??:;a i?•r% b,?_ 5 1 ?* \\ .r'? `-? -+ri r: •• Yr t._ ?, Ci ':: L"'1 .f..'rf rr! }^ .,, ii ''r: 1,?:•.why.'S. 'tFr ,."\ "' r•.I'.iiFicrYS1 II?r9y, .:fl •St} .a;-. tr tJ?.r7' ?';` ,i,•:r,.• r??i \ f/ L ?'- r ?? _ ? 'y`?t?=:F • 6f;'?^:•i ?5;';?'? t;%r.? r ?? °' "7'(rA ;f ?t:s r:,: ?,?pi iT:rt ?/ ??`' ? ?C ? ?'? s. ?o-• .' .?.?,,.c! rn'..••: _ '.:>tz; ?. ?I'`??....r' rl'; ;.•, . • ?'?: ?}:ys?q t'vs?yr,:?.z'w' p ]3 \ (CS V ,` 4 O'?[r.S y.r;',iY 'may„'- =.?rl-,+.,. ,nY`w..t4? 1?'1" eS tS'?('j t •??'4 ?. :4,',?.l?,r,.:: fin: 3 ? J t--'.,: ., :•-+.. ?,a- ,.i''• fir.':: .•Y?r. ': ?' "r.,.:•'•.':F. •• .?,• 1 `.?..'r•NJ.ti '?.r 1? 1 \5 \' S .. . r ..•• L. .i47 •.Tr . ? fc* w. ? '.. _ ...1•? 17 ?^?J ? -?S ? ?? ? ?` I ? ry';:%-. ., 4'0.?.?•, L•?? ? '? E? jtV"' ` ntV••>I 7:??? ? ? 4".i::'•.or;'li.?: 16 `, T ? ?Rt , ? •It _ V? - . ? tC171ksi`r .. F-.... PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION' p`N'M E R: Case: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION'. LAND 115E PLAN ZONING ROivi: DROPERTY SIZE ACRES: C,]i TO: - -? _?____.___-- ???___-• Right-or-way In A,rav ATLAS PACE: . ' SEC: : 7'N P: RA`1GE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 30ARD: - :: .. CITY COMMISSION: ordhiance No. 6621-00 , mrrui?ua AM41S. L. 1. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNERS: Michael Biros & Linda Biros LOCATION: 1107 Nursery Road, approximately 270 feet south of Seabreeze Street. REQUEST: To annex the property into the City of Clearwater at the request of the property owners and approve the appropriate City land use plan category and zoning district. SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 7,650 square feet or 0.17 acres Dimensions of property: Lot width 75 feet by 102 feet deep PROPERTY USE Current Use: Single family residential Proposed Use: Single family residential PLAN CATEGORY Current County Plan Category: Residential Low Proposed City Plan Category; Residential Low ZONING DISTRICT Current County Zoning District: Residential Single Family District (R-3) Proposed City Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) ANALYSIS The property owners have'requested this annexation in order to receive garbage collection service from the City. The applicants are currently receiving water service from the City. According to the City Utilities Department records, this service has been provided to the applicants since May 29, 1998. The subject property is an existing single family residential home. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Low and it is '.f CDB ANX 00-08-15 October 17, 2000 Page 2 proposed to be zoned Law Medium Density Residential (LMDR). 1. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES Water and Sewer The City of Clearwater has been providing water service to the subject property since May 29, 1998, and the capacity for the subject continues to be available for this utility. The closest water line is immediately adjacent to the property in the Nursery Road right-of- way. There is a manhole located at the junction of the Nursery Road and Sunny Park and the applicants are aware of the cost of future extension and connection of sewer service from this manhole to the subject property. According to the City Utilities Department records, the applicants have already paid the tap fee and utility deposit. Solid Waste Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's Resource Recovery Plant and available capacity is available to serve the property. Police The property is located within the West Police District and service will be administered through the District 2 Station located at 645 Pierce Street. Community policing service will be provided through the City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect police service and response time, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to the property by Station #45 located at 610 Pierce Street. The Fire Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time, in summary, the proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public facilities and their level of service. CDD ANX 00-05-15 October 17, 2000 Page 3 II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan designates the site as Residential Low whose intent is to recognize areas where use and development characteristics are low density residential in nature.. Residential uses are the primary uses in this plan category up to a maximum of 5 dwelling units per acre. Other permissible uses in the Residential Low plan category include Public/Semi-Public uses, schools, and ancillary non-residential and Recreation/ Open Space uses. The annexation does not propose to change the Residential Low plan category and the proposed use is consistent. with the uses and density of this plan category. Further, the annexation promotes infill development as stated in Objective 2.4 of the Future Land Use Plan: 2.4 Objective - In considering extension of service and facilities, Clearwater shall actively encourage Intill development. In summary, the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plait both in the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies of the Plan. III. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS The appropriate zoning district under the new Community Development Code is the Low Nledium Density Residential (LMDR) District whose dimensional requirements are consistent with the surrounding development on this site. The application for annexation covers an existing detached family home. Detached dwelling units are required to have a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet in the LMDR zoning district. The subject property has a lot size of7,650 square feet which exceeds the minimum lot size requirement of the LMDR zoning district. In addition, a review of the survey site plan indicates that the site meets the dimensional requirements of the LMDR district as a standard development. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH TtIE COUNTYWIDE PLAN There is no change requested in the Comprehensive Plan category of the site that will remain Residential Low with it maximum density of 5 units per acre. According to Special Act 88-464 which established the Pinellas Planning Council, annexations of less than 10 acres do not require the review of tl}e Council nor of the Countywide Planning Authority. Therefore, due to the small size of this property, review by the Pinellas Planning Council is not required. There are no other Countywide Plan policies applicable to this application. CDB ANX 00-08-15 October 17, 2000 Page 4 f V..' CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA LAW Florida Statutes require that a proposed annexation be both contiguous with the existing municipal boundaries and compact in its concentration (Florida Statutes Chapter 171), This property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the north and represents a logical extension of the existing boundaries. The compact standard of Florida law requires that the annexation does not create an enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries. The annexation of this property is consistent with this standard and no new enclave will be created by annexation of this property. In summary, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law. VI. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS There are no current code enforcement violations nor any code enforcement history on this site. I= SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed annexation can be served by all City of Clearwater services, including utilities.; police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service level. The applicants have been receiving water and sewer services from the City since May 29, 1998. The proposed annexation and proposed use is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. The property will exceed the minimum lot size of the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundary and is compact in concentration. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the request: 1. Recommend APPROVAL of the annexation of the property located at 1407 Nursery Road. 2. Recommend APPROVAL of the Residential Low plan category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. I Recommend APPROVAL of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. , Prepared by: Etim S. Udoli, Senior Planner fig .? ?? , • ? is •4f? ; ;.^ > - , 1 . ? ? ? :'7 d ' ' ? ? % " ! '. „',6i: ? '. te : ' : , ? i -' ., . E. .. !• ? }s'',Z „?f . y^ Iii?L?'S A. > 'R•! }. :/'?V ` r . u,? .. .??"?i . ., 1 ?? f< . J,r !'Yr' ?? '?' ?G, L. ? " b ' , , 1 1. • { *9h t YY.e r, r.a. v.....-Le r.lrw. ? .., r. e S, ? ... r r .. n.x I.. f - . ' GDB ANX 00-08-15 October 17, 2000 fF 1. Pages '"Attachments. so Application = Aerial Photograph of, Site and Vicinity ? ! Land Use Map :. . Zoning>Atlas Utilities Maps 1 1 • r tA;;`i s?+ ?6;r •r= t, i ?'; i'l.. ?} i i? 1 ???r'r r .F' ;'•#s ll? Ir ? t ? :f ri'• r, i'?1': •'r • s: :.I?..K2. 1l.R r ;_. ?..•' t ., F, it • 1 , j,,:. ,???;? 'i!''i F: ,rt •], y?=lll.'= .. ,i';[t` .. .. ? ?+ :r ,' .. o •S.. rat. P ,?i:; `: :: ?,' - .r 'r' . ° i f - , i?-i •Y•t .?,e `.?r, ?`rb „j???> ?7?•c°?3`'4'r°'•` 'i' ?'3?`' s..?...r ?}•r .1? .. ? ? - ? - .• ' „ a; ? f,'}S, i? r??? '4?, s`"r?'?• i?f ?.?i>xt r:'[•',;y? -•ns?? ? .. +a ? z ? r:.:! , I ? f ;iL'« ??. 4?r1. ?+': ?i?t"? . ff ; `?'}.. x.15. ?'t. d. ?> . f:;#'i' f , i , i I..cr r.•.L t?,:?;?i'?.?ur kr5 .It.:f .??'3•f.?.:' ?:n+'.:i € r., <?,-..,.."';:.. <r.±q?' ? ? •, i .L . ,.a?t?} ?{,. , . '?-K??,F #, ''r (r? i a7j3 ;.,fir ?• ftr• ?' ' ?E -..:, tr ,?s;' ,?..,.? .f._; ,. ;-...;,,,r ,1:'? ??tt••.9k=: ..t y .;k?c'S±l srkf:r,fa' -'1?, 'i{r•?ds?1.?. ?s 'sz`w'r '+! i,r?'.r?..?•??' -'. 3l?!. 31:; ?'}:. `ti,:! x'''' k°x:• ti?ir?i"y %r ,.?' ,?(.#.•r:'" 1: •: ?•_': ;••? :s. ? , 4 ,? ;i r }' ,'f'' '> .i ,fA 'R'S' .6:n+S. . ??': !i, l.'°[.. I'.u°Ti[,•. .: .JV.?'?fd..S.?1i.+:..i,J??,?fl.r..•{aL,? .?• ..:E. w. i. fi: Y.. `.;S4i??{''•...5 .: it l..b' ? _ .. , :, ..1.'. : , ?af ?. ..1• .:r• 1 ."o +;f ,,r •_ t e m ,? ? • ? •' ?. ,1 a ?• ? , ' i a Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Bate; November 16,00 SUBJECTIRECOMMEN DATION: Annexation, Land Use Plan amendment and Rezoning for properties at 107 &111 McMullen Booth Road (MBs 21104 & 21105); Owners: Thomas Kelly and Michael Ciaramello. MOTION: APPROVE the annexation of properties located at 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (Metes and Bounds 21-04 and 21-05 in Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, a Land Use Plan Amendment from County Residential Urban (RU) to City Residential/Office Limited (R10L), and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from County Zoning Residential, Single Family (R-3) District to City Office (O) District, and PASS ordinances 6631-00, 6632-00 and 6633-00 (ANX 00-08-19 and LUZ 00-08-09) on first reading. [3 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The sites are located at 107 and 110 McMullen Booth Road at the southeast corner of the intersection of McMullen Booth and Bay Lane. The site is approximately 0.56 acres in size, The subject properties are currently used as a single family residential and a duplex respectively. The purpose of the annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning is to allow the applicants to receive City sewer service and to allow office redevelopment of each of these two parcels. The properties will be served by the City of Clearwater water and sanitary sewer service. The applicants are aware of the need and costs to extend and connect the water and sanitary sewer lines to their respective properties. The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: • The proposed annexation will not have an adverse impact on public facilities and their level of service. • The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide Plan and the Community Development Code. + The proposed annexation is contiguous to existing municipal boundaries, represents a logical extension of the boundaries and does not create an enclave. Please refer to the attached report for the complete staff analysis. FWewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs Legal Info Svc NIA PLANNING DEP T W' Total ETIM S UDOH Budget NIA Public Works NIA User Dept.: . Funding Souic e; Purchasing NIA DCM/ACM s Planning Current FY cl Fisk Mgmt NIA Other Attachments ORDINANCES OP NO. 6631-00, 6632-00 & 6633» 00 STAFF FORT Other submitted by: 'n Appropriation Code: Citv Manager P'?jo? ? None Dr1roa i m rwn&40d r.Wv+r CC LUZ 00-08-09 Thomas Kelly & Michael. Ciaramello Page'2 The site'is less than ten acres; therefore, the Pinellas Planning Council will not make a determination on the City's ability to serve the property. The Planning Department determined that the proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning applications are consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: • The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning application are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • The potential-range of uses and the specific proposed use are compatible with the surrounding area. • Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the, property, • The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment. Please refer to the attached report for the complete staff analysis. In accordance with the Countywide. Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to the approval of the Pinellas Planning Council and the Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Due to the size and/intensity of the plan amendment site, review and approval by Florida Department of Community Affairs is not required. The Community Development Board reviewed these applications at their public hearing of October, 17, 2000 and recommended approval of all three, applications. ORDINANCE NO. 66311-00 AN ORDINANCE. OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD AND BAY LANE, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF DREW STREET, CONSISTING OF M&B'S 21/04 AND 21105 IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, MANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 107 AND 111 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, INTO THE CORPORATE LiMiTS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE' IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: See attached Exhibit "A" (ANX 00-08-19) Section 2. - The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This or shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: z - 2v Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6631-00 OORE --- ! ICl r r D ;:jR i? d BORDEAUX {.. 4. al !r} COMPLEX ESFA ES i a p , „ c,?C nr?l ?? Z '? [a eq I I lr M 7 2 :G CHAMBLEE 0 I o v r t1L 11M r c?0 r r„?1 ^.r ?1?1 ~1 1f; I 1 14 1.3 I I i 78--2,. _ ?- STREET ,r .,,': ; :z' .. -.•,:,•.,;:. ;;:; ?? •? STR T ,r .? - '. .?... -L. '• ? 1 '.T•.':.'A: .. 4 Y ?.? ?`• •• 4Ti •t•] .i: ^• ?•?-l, .. '4.4 :tr3[?1 aj?•r•Y:., :{. .'?..?'' .?S-.a?' O'.?:r •?:•: i•:1•? •''t?'.+:.N ?: ?- .?1.?? s7, a ,?•??, '..S u',?•., [.. ? ',fi?• . r, ? .1'i.:'.? r ;. r , r -au .' il. : ? •s •w ?,r.;' .w ti i .. [, •r,. .:e , ?,:. ,?t,. ? _ ?:. ?.r . •'r:'. sJ [ ':? 5;1, ,? .,.?'[i '?? ?rY-YG? .r }ry -•L.(a:sJ. '' r •:.?7 rv..,:?:' •, !'•?4.±' ..1,''.'-? !i i" . t , S r ' •}': ? [ I l4? ja • '+ ','i?: ?':,.'??:•".t 'r?• ! ,i"i:5'?:.,;- .,•;;• ..r•' ??;y .e 3: i4•?: a?;:•rt,6=..,i,; _?•.?;?g?• ?l ': r. r.?.. d_ ,. ,,,. S a•r. N. ^•• iJ. '4?.iY•' ,r?i 'it ??R r r,., 4s r !- .I, ;', % i, '.f1111"r••, ,•n, •, ? .,J jF : 1 '?:: i. _ 7! ii :."{!y" 'ti 4 'i !' . s••ib :'• ''' ? ^ ` i '' ' :•w .t r? .?!j'?? "'":+?'. :?%"?-'; i,; i.••-. :s.:t .'.l ?r.7 r,?': V'.i;li •4.,: A •v":•: ?}' ?ti •r! ?r,;'' 77?s 1'?t?f tti??.•?4;1` f'.:! VY`r ?fx[ ?1•.:,' +:: •-ry! -r :' _.r.f.:•1.-' :+('-iI r lr"?..-":'•f,;';-•,: .?T?} Z. *'.?Ay •1 IT'S ?< ! ! i•,,.-:]{' ?y? L•,lt.lJ.. ?•1,"' •?i?}e!, 'r„s?,a `.;. St, ',t• C: i.',r .-1•,•, "' iJ'_ .,,? :•s:•?,'•r.• -;±••[. r:?'i. •='1r. .!%,* ,.:1'^:•^ .y?'G :?Li t. i-Yr. ,'%• .'.': h••? 3.,<'?: •:r 7H.?.r;•,.,•. .;?,f.,., •ir- [•,,: Oi„ ,• r rC i:: 6?1q- r r••• -ri•.. t, ':A•. r'rn.i . ,?•yf ? j....: a• • a; . ?'• r.?... rr,.+? - T• ti,•.. ..°,: [ 'T!' 'r;1. ? .,,. ?4 1•. ,!S' .?}f•1'.w iii'%•1 :p -.,LZr"' .°.'•,..?i i'- N 11 Mr ?? 1.? -.??`.. S LY'• ;:itk"'',t'.[r',': Its ..t:I,.t' • , '•? tir•'? ' ^: 1 7 ?' il /' 1. ,.S''• :;i:.::'•::.? i•-i :; ?1 . ' ,ya • w •, 4.. .. yy., r .a t M' r.. •„?: .r s?nZ. ?1 q, '?T?i::.`i"?: .r'1;?rt'. «?Lk ;?i•. f•: r• s .I?i"'. 7;? ?',r-?J•t:f ?"? r?.. ?: j, r!e r , !":-?'i. _:•YG7?C: .' ;lr9C'• y't,L s' ' L • titi .y •' ¦. ;4 ?, [• ?'i•: n::. ? a.. Y!' . ?.?~ 1 t . "4 [' S:t . r ,? i `'ti-.li;: r•!:!, ? ,S. Ld. ":• r,.`• M ? 5 n7' r.?' ? '-f'•'T ys y?i t ? t'' ,J s ? .ri t :??:?•4• ! •J•}• • ° ;.4,.Y. 2? - •? n 4" :'?,: 'v I?•,L ?y, ? ?:c ? , ?'ij=? • :n4:w. ?.? i J i ,. lrffi.a ?rs5! ! !?• , ,, ;:; .,.Jr ':eyt '::. f:j'Y_C 9f li•.y tTf •r;.i 4 4'• '?•t`1.' r 4.4 ,-`. ?i1 .?? ? ?; }' 'Jr :F4,f ?a{::. f:i.••., •!: '•r\'. •C.s rya .S?'.' ?;. ryr; .', `. ,:? t1.sT3'? •a ;;te6iii ?j3-' ?kL ?. ) < -.•r tiw t? cf ?. •,?'.??:1 ,,. 1`. f. ?'. T) •. ,, r. _ I-, -h• l i t :,:/.'rte '!(': tr,•'rf..- ra ??s •';. r.,•?i•r'Ly,. ?rl'.J: ..M 1L...,a .., .: ». '??•ri ? s.y.,ti i.-a -e. ;..:: f C+:? fr a 1'?r 'Q, ,,'+?.. ;C• Y ii •r-r .11;. r r .i.: - ,`." "i. J.,,,..•r._ r; f .,5.,, . ,.r ?s?[ ;:ft•f ,A• "'l+ti:?f;. •at. ...w ,. .:{••. •,ra?. 'ky •r•ti .:c'M,E1 :: .1 :??ri '? ?? ', .?S;r ;? • f.. h ?,f T2? j:• t. J'1t 'r'' n .3: 'f{ ?'•• ,4?',t?•ti' f:.i` i• r. ., ;., ": ?,?????'?s`'1?t, .-:. , %t:.?.; i" ! K' ? f fi'• T.. 2 {{ ?ri NAY 'T•57?;?C ,I: •..n;:f;.. ;:'S?44{.' yr:?d.4?:} l1?f4t? tk' i;•'! f,:'•rirr :1: tiw.; I;• 'r i` 4-.''. i": rl1; ?t'... Y ^• J-':-r ,ir'.rl • JFr1 v' l1r''f? , ;o ,.}-.i. V'? '.?,•j''I ?u.-s.? ? --•. 2. I is"i `i•7 .:a" Ll•fC1'??' 1 r; :^ ' •.+ b +: :S!'4'.._I 6:; ,':.,.;J,ti.'rsG..f.'i:.,:'r. ??ii,.•(•i;•'a .?.?? +j?? I •1 ?' 7 Nit, LL • ?.. S' ,yf r:5-r'. r'+h?44'i i?+ tisr"l?" ., .,. ',. l'•".•f:•? v ., r.. ^`Y•;•.`P?•4 'J s Yt ??., - r•••;;• r:.S,,.;3.':•' ;•_.?,I •"';;}•ir?.•?::1 r .(? 4 ` .J j l..OI .i r• , T bO? :,1 'i+.?` `*;?`?:.1 Z '• r.. , EAT RW ;i+•r' .P4'?e? ¢S,r T'?„f ,ral" r.•.,! r;!.?l' s• ,?•' Sri ?r:ti?v :'i 1 7 ? 5 7 N / , T -.r ,,;:?(,,?i?w Z !, i rrFl7 •?!. a,•1.. 171. '? •`1 E•. r. ., rr yF ': ?'-r.?''•,? .4?1:• Y s'l cb.•, r g ' li • ° 'r 14 y'?,?tiZ?St' ' ` -re-r;s•e??•. ti ,,- ` ?'..'!r E'^r.?;'r,l- ••k.•?•t. ,:?f? ::f::.•• t, n! ,' •; .".r ? ? F. •'a+ii?; I I:` ..r'.???=t :?.1y{.s. •( .)?+:?..r[•.'st-?y?:;l•+r.r.•??..rj?.? .S;r..1li.?-t:.. j . .r?_ ? ? M /• iJ9 .': 1 Y •' ?'li`• i•!?'24j.'0 il''%:??`?ri':y:% •, i• !? T Q@Bt+t' E}tPR?iat? ?`4t•i• `•' COURT $ r fT2 •'jFLJ' CLEAR TER 3777- 4 4 ? ; FEATHER'NOQ>] } 10 1R ;r /' I r. mss ?lY S a rYi .;r ?;.?: ? h ? ? `?' I •? ? ? ?y3\ J '+K,;'•}??6 ?. is ff. ? 4 109 o CH ESA AKE 18 17 1i 15 = 13> Q r•7 .t,.: l ?i ?.l i •+'1•=1? y:: .1 t ti?.rf, g 1??i f PAR k fi•? ;..:;?.,=,.. ??' ; ??., 105 L ;??: .Jr y?•f• s?,,ii.•s`?:"' ,r}•{:i 1 -7.1?. F?T?{?i j•.?r:. / + r'N'N jr •.?. 'rV•Yi / `.3 ?jLyali1 .fir M i• 3 • I?,.t1' i? •1;?w.i.;L.lr'."t ?'.`..rp "' 1 0 OS/ 37 ? :7/71 ;.,I•"til.''';'1C?y:• i ?` 2? 3lyt , ,r:'+`';,r ' • r.. L• LAG..,; d 95 7P E a6,ti:?n S'i 't.Lp OYSTER r-__. I CLEVELAND ur... .?lA?_?? TR C- ?I1r ?I.yr ? M1 C 1!.?5_2 I _ ----? r ' ?'` r L -all , G7-v:d -r1L-I•C 5•cG7 .u; :C9'+ ??'tr! I Cl ('r ??- K `T i'?_. .;•p•,_ n •.,u°,• •. '?r ` - r=' ?r?s ::1r.43 :1-1 A PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION s OWNER: Michael A. Ciaramelio & Thomas Kelly j CASE ANX 00-08-19 SITE: 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road N. i PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 0.56 - ZONING LAND USE : 16/29/16%00000/210/0402 PEN: FROM; X1-3 County RU 16/29116/00000/210/0500 TT TO: O R/OL ATLAS 292A + PAGE: rxhlbit "A" Ordinance No. 6631--00 Eegin at the NW comer of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East and run thence S 89027'56" E along the Section line, 1338.09 feet; thence S 00°37'03" W. 266.14 feet for a P.O.B.; thence S 89°27'56" E 230.00 feet; thence S 00037'03" W, parallel to the 40-acre line, 64.0 feet; thence N 89°27'56" W 230,00 feet; thence N 00037'03" E, along the 40-acre line, 64.00 feet to the P.O.B. LESS the Westerly 50.00 feet thereof for Road Right of Way. And That part of the North % of the Northeast'/. of the Northwest Y4 of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, located according to the plat of Crystal Heights Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 28, Page 1, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the intersection of Bay Lane and State Road No. 593, as shown on said plat, and running thence East along the South boundary of Bay Lane 180 feet, thence South parallel to the middle line of said Road No. 593, 71 feet, thence West parallel to the South boundary of Bay Lane, 180 feet to the East boundary of Road No. 593, thence North along the East boundary 71 feet to the Point of Beginning. s t i, t ORDINANCE NO. 6632-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD AND BAY LANE, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF DREW STREET, CONSISTING OF M&B'S 21104 AND 21105 IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 107 AND 111 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIALIOFFICE LIMITED;PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance Is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating 'the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Pro e See attached Exhibit "A" (ANX 00-08-19) Land Use Category Residential/Office Limited Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6631-00, and subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form l 1 17 Leslie K. Dougall-Sid Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No, 6632.00 Begin at the NW comer of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East and run thence S 89027'56" E along the Section line, *1338.'09 feet; thence S 00037'03" W, 266.14 feet for a P.O.B.; thence S 89°27'56" E 230.00 feet; thence S 00037'03" W, parallel 'to the 40-acre line, 64.0 feet;.thence N 89°27'56" W 230.00 feet; thence N 00°37'03" E, along the 40-acre line, 64.00 feet to the P.O.B. LESS the Westerly 50.00 feet thereof for. Road Right of Way. And That part of the North 1/4 of the Northeast % of the Northwest'/, of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, located according to the plat of Crystal Heights Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 28, Page 1, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the intersection of Bay Lane and State Road No. 593, as shown on said plat, and running thence East along the South boundary of Bay Lane .180 feet, thence South parallel to the middle line of said Road No. 593, 71 feet, thence West parallel to the South boundary of Bay Lane, 180 feet to the East boundary of Road No. 593, thence North along the East boundary 71 feet to the Point of Beginning. i i 3 1 OGRE In. u0 ? ? ? IA1 / I ? MD 2 BORDE.AU? ? u.• lr .10; ( ,) COMPLEX w C ' `: •' 23 29 ESI A ES Iy 'Y K r1 O y, ti 7 rG ,:'J h/ } ~ y r y I •h , CHAMSLEE ?? - i Y(O? i = ?1 ,r 13 IY_ i7 lo" i is tj , 1? 13 ?- I 78 , 2 ,I-rga STREET Y .,fL?; ;+ , fir' 's r.';.t:'; :o •'r=.: '.:?, n STR T , ..t ?- ,r :. . ' '" , s 'r i :: •l7 ? r?-, .M?7.,, ... , h.'! ':" "h:t . i S. ?_ .i :"';1J'rs 'i;i='.,'V. %1? .5:^J: ',5;: '' .. rr , .t.)•'?^,r ._31, O;t;: -iii °.. -.•iY•? w??_." .k7.?i'? •T ?•f'.a•.'= .`?s•1 r,' :?-,r ?7? 4, .'fi a: ?' :,, ir ',.:.: r• .?1. `cv., 1 rti i ?s a.` .`,' _ -i'r'r. a•r?'-f,Z:+,.f,._ :ii :'`?•;q .':.: '1:'f., C.., r.. ,Iti i'Cs "i .• ..:J.r !s' .`idl•1 ?L? 1', ., ±;'? s "r L ""•, ''1 r.a• ,:? ;,.?rfi •,?' °O`?'fr r}? 4. '1'.'.!51' ,.,,,,?,r. ?i? r.,Ft7 4, ?` ?'.•', j, S 7.1 ii.. 'io',1•t.?ri..? ?' } f:r: . R... ,S? .1}.. .1-S. ,..r, tit N, ?. •?I •r: :?::: = r 3 ?f•. ,,?;.? N,,.;? I,. ' F?? •,t ?! <1? :i' v !.aL i'. :i ,r,•3?,, }`. ;V'f ': ft ': :.r:c iTl:. y •"r -?a :{;11T 'ti :li • ? •'s , f ' ? _., _ . I ' • ,.' r , { •t. 1 .1 { ? r.f1 4 j 4: ' .? A .: ? ..? S f y. . i. ' ? f t2' 11e •f;•`• f:'• ' il,? 7 t } ? PV RUN, =?+? :? /:: .? ;.:. :f.. .:i•i•] a . ,, s.,n?':•i+5 •'r'• 1 ,r, 1. art: ,7, rY".!1%, ;:?!Y; f.. , ?'rl'•. r ?' =?, 4,(• ?f 4•:f..',;1'i?' ?••i•"'l..?'.i: _? YV"l?:.` tom' ?r..? 'a:.'`v ,I•' , ] -v;.t, .y,' !i .r.':V•wL?•.i s: ,y, '. ?.. t.,'.'• .. 1 tr J aY?h, P' • •1' •r<.. , •."et, -?; :1 'srr /':'1'•,' 1 ?a s` ? a.. s t.• :?' i.tl,:1 ? i i,h ,•;'. , l F': .•F. i:?NE ?i ;4 rfr.: r . .a::.N :: :. •,;?1 »••:: ar:... r ?., .x _?i ??• BAY:r,• ,,, .. ,•; ? 1. :?.r • r I? '` '?'•S''' y f+' ?•ti: •,.,7?r •` ? ::F L 1._. _I .',1Q, y. ,:?? ?± ?h• 'lLt?•j, .._'y4'?''! .??. 5r•'j4' ••'l1:.•w ? i'':.? i"L '?"• ii ;.?4l; t?'r` ? •?,.:S, •.r''-:]'f':Y;'.• i 4'? 47.a.. `y,,., y J;f E4'i? °:(S cy ti?".. w.+?r ,.; t ?••?., ?'a :a?ii'?#• •4':.a.: ~ 4't..•? E •r a !e sr+.. I`.1 q '?'.`..S! ?, ...?' '! i'• r29. I ?F7 ??i'\y,1. r :.?-"!; j'}Sti1 ,.•dt•?.? I?h: ?,...?:vs''. # 'd.i':Kh'%• ^Ii'i' i M1f'+,Ytlixi:?,x•,o n r, s. ,?, ,,qq,,11 •I??1 •??` ?,.y , ,?• ?• F y ••? : it. 'sii G ?? • !i! + 1' t.z:r ': tit`n ? '?' :?? •:inrr+?ItS ?:?•fivS:['F :k _X._i:.?'..r,;[a3?..!f4 '?,.?i/.1. .; 1?:•!n','s 4i. t.?.f3? ?...., 'i tli••.GJ.f'S/.!C.7•1r - .n CL6,1R SCR a CHESA ACE PAR Eir, C Y .•?r. •,f, .x?? t;. :i; yY.ti.: v•--' ,7•.r: °{7?f c •?•T `S. r ?cr 1 4f :?:..?y,t•,'-rr .S .,, rla •1 'S,s•• 7c -. -,.• E?,. ;, r is?7• Qi FZ4 Ys 1•r. ?ri, .?1.s ? ?!/L•yl.;l. 1'I. tt.'•1?' Yb7f4"..?.. r' ,F$)' .,VrM^.''?. ,' .:.fir-'r T;' 4. i.N'rlJ.i' }• •,1 F - ,':!may l ,1 ?•,.. ,7 ?''?' `, ,,ix:iuk? ''?.s? '•,"r?:ti "?' a r„ !! z' r2 '; r?i•r ;? ,;=?A=;,;s ??,_> :-'f. EATH RW30 o . , ,,4`t•?:F t, t;:rr?.;3 f 1 1 2 3 ! 6 7 ?+ a,' 16 ',?(yr??(tYit. ,?j'?L?iti•?: r!}'? 1,f4:,• ? w ?1 / r, til ? ? M 4 (_" '._:?il?: ?-;ti;i' ?5i:a :•5ri?tM'.. a; D :?'r• / \3149 C,-''?.r CedlkccRtl rZ?S :4 /T12 . '•'?' ' COURT," .771-434 FEATHERWOOD 10 79 19 17 3 F 1 Tryt ?, t t)3.}:f Si r17 f•: , /lop-?8 t rD.,O ,1, f'r l.lE ?t? 25 '' .• i?, V r. ,. ,, i' ,? OYSTER L rzs w its S1 zo . ,n re r`s t 1 3 3 r+ a. Ef l ' ?r-i.??• a -s? Q PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: Michael A. Ciaramello & Thomas Kelly CASE ANX 00-08-19 SITE: 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road N. ; PROPERTY SIZE '(ACRES): 0.56 - ZONING LAND USE 10/29/16/00000/21010400 PIN: FROM: R-3 County RU 16129/16/00000/210/0500 TO, 0 RIOT. ATLAS 292A PAGE. Ordinance NO. 6632-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6633-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL -PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD AND BAY LANE, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF DREW STREET, CONSISTING OF M&B'S 21104 AND 21105 IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE .. POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 107 AND 111 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS OFFICE (O); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the-City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located In Pinellas County, Florida, Is hereby zoned. as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Pro a Zoning District See attached Exhibit "A" Office (O) (ANX 00-08-19) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6631-00. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to f6rm: Attest: Z".4 Leslie K. Dougall-Sid s Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 6633-00 OORE I r, 3 !;; -ft 1 ?a El. 1 y •a D??R 00RD AU U i COMPLEX 2 7 I 29 Er^STA ES'7 ` ,rt, , ur r 7 w a nl T-1- n, ?m ?'l ti ..1 co a ! r. H'IS( CHAINBLEE I sG?Gt'F-' 13 ! 12 11n I C`I 78-2 ? -371 •1 STREET r 5TR T ,' .?r-i' .F'i'•'r:;` ,i'• ?`' a7.1• 1_1 ; l•?f ZG J. . r?:,i?i=rr r?r i ''.+:•J-•• 'i7r: .a? •T;,' r+. +'•?.?"3 '=, 1:'?r:14 •.t'.:4 ?::. :?'':f r. ??IQ??Y! ?'.. f»ANE!'•: 45._'l ;,,ir i: ?.: }!?Z¢j`„. ,fji sl"• ..?4• i't's i',` '".Yf..a +?. ?•r'??: .ri??. 1?..1;?'-tt; •(?- •.,,:?^r i.?i !:'L:µ•r..' :???• V•l •: '+r:• r is t'y1'i' :F? i` 'R l • •''1 ?;•.i: `,1 r. ;Y t•r a..i .? ?ry•.? i•i'?:t; ?4?'i" 11r.•.'?•: r'? 'f•• 4 ,i ?.s? :'yl ..yC:L,.r - ,.ft !t5: 1 ..i M ?i ?• i. err t ?F?-i r r.:7 • '? ? ?J_".i• ?-,! i.l t S?.'. y.F . !?' ,lf,'-:.:'4: 1i. ?,r"?F ?V' ?, f• ? '.,'.pl •'?, r? "1" t µ rX ": .. ' l+ , t % : F+•'•1.1•,`: • .. ` ri ' (Y .?. 4'i, .r ?. '? ?' ?_..' .."r L `? •r -3c? y v. ? - IX t'ti''.?.t-. s ,.? y. ?a t 'YT. `.Y},9 O)• .n?. . liY pie,, L"?' ?•rht ' ? t ?i . ti ?r'P?? . ;i3?'- + ? 1:.: :? :. .. r•• r. w k3 .k; ?{; ', : yy .e. 'Y: , r•.r : `• .u' r_ ''r : j .!+ •r:r : ?,,: r<;. 3'•r. ?. f,, ::• r •"'• C.7'` t ? f•R .. P2r :7 - .y•.?r. ,Yll FAN. '' .?} .l•?•s. 'l .'.•?•%i ?., ?•. ?. i.r'•' _ L i...? 1?'' •f".? ??r = r•~i? r t{?t'r ?,?.;,t" '_;_-,2T/6* ;r .,.I'. r ?!. i.rr-. r.?t` ^?'-;''!;? ,,`'r-"'t IS. .: ?3•'. 4_4 r ...: C :,rTRH ',,Y.• 'wµ ! ?" . lr •/'?••,' -y} t? ,' tt • f .? fir i .i ?, >:r' .,4 v.: +if. ?wr f B' L" A • i rY'. i?1rt ?••'?.:'Jiy},l r•'!r 'S?,.Sl?t/-1r,{y?v?,.:rr,: N?.1 ,F ',C'4" ', :..i`f.,l ?jft:t. ?..,i_ ? ? ?•.:F '?rr-!,j.v r ri. ?l':/}F'?,.j'T j -,'T , ? <t J }1' '?' ?.-fx; i•.•5; ', !r: a 1" Q ,?:,.. ;. ,•s f' ''t?rw .; s : ? ;:. l _'':?i?-;Al 3•:?-+rt =. ?, .;.... ?rL•'??4;' r. fir'+i' ''+TI??, f ;,i:,. `y=`r';r• 1i ,?,r? >.''F.';i'.f,7v: Tl.?.xiit,! rr•"j .??w'. "t:[ n $ - fry i f........t5 EATS- F?RWbob i lea 6 7 3 116, ,r.'t ??'t,•:i.:.. .- ??w'., aai?,+••),,•?4 ='•'ysii: :. x.:?1.' !1:•:ci.. ?'r•? r'? O ro •r 2 7 ,•,?`• l Y?i'a '.l' ny , ,,?•. f f.i •'=1: .', ?7•..r.• -'1~7' } :71G"- ( V 4 ?? % 1' ?f• "r:t^ r -'n1 7 y irk 'A,t' ti ,'a, r. r r?i?T.;r• r. ?' : f-%r.. ¢; L! :'f. r+ ` e i'!' 1 1 .4' .• l :.r' si. S 1_rr ?. .? ? ,1. i,7' '} fts:' '` •J ? ra nt r ?•, 1 'f.e... . r.., `HL .'•?S'7L 'S •f-; 1 :,. r'? t;•.•?'+ ti-! j, i... ?:0 •?'t ,`,:.i'-q?? ty'. p O !.-,:(''C'; -y:. ?;`•L';•l;yl.s• :1.;?!i^;?f?'j?.,,,,.':1fri; ...?..0=r`t:,.•,.-k.ti:a-: cs,? l=/? /• '?3fr© ? 1 / J• . i:?: '?lt:1.•,:CO i1t ;': 't. fit. 7'-'?? QeY1 1XGSIjttCfl r o`,° C0URT11 772 tteAR \TEa 3777 43 4: =•tr:. FEATI.II;R'aVaQ1? 3Q ki'r3 ='; : r1 , Q .ni :t%?' o rry~--, V'I,i?-•jrf i "+',9J` f i rti•1'I?Q {I.1? t7 - :C r..,t'; h M is s-i C, „? ' i rr `r`i• 0 CHESA AKE 19 'i Hi:?r ' e it: 3::?: ,•,t, a• q?? 1 ? ? ?•irSij'?Sil ' sy. F4L! a PAR r:. a. J ^.Li S 5 + r? 15 J ?•?i. "?h'?yiy?t`'c?gt' .;.-•. 1f ?.t? ;0f ' ?_%:fn rn ? 1L? y 1 nFr i l:'}m: ??•• `:•.a1,L":, z'{li ?? 71 0S/ 2 2 -1 C4i?-a:?) CLEVELAND S•I . 'r ' '.rr. ' i-. y- OYSTER ;?r !" i-i 'ir'c - # '-.i ^ j==- -? ,i-! °•'? (j . =l3,. e:', - '. '? o v. ,a • -n fi ? , I 1 ?? ..? 4.> 'J}' , ?' ?? 77 s ?-. ? IL..__.r?.. n 1 ? 3 , •. •,I?"GS- "G t aii. •tll-ti9 al' t?93 ><, ? ? ? ?, r I^iryi{Iti ?.,ly; iF-•_.__ •- f , I.1.? I----•?-'---'•-- 11v'- y _ ?.t?•i?^=,Ir%t •uul°.' -•'? i I mil=fit'-tom ?? ?Ik 13133 ~ i I Y r? PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: Michael A. Ciaramello & Thomas Kelly CASE ANX 00-08-19 SITE: 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road N. PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 0,56 ? .--_- ^.-- -?-?-ZONING ?---??_?.----- LAND USE PIN: 16/29/16100000/210/0400 EROW R-3 County Alf _ 16/29116100000121010 500 --------------.~.... 7p; O RIOL ATLAS 292A PAGE: Ordinance No. 6633-00 I Begin;at,the MW corner of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East and run thence S 89027'56" E along the Section line, 1338.09 feet;, thence S 00°3703 W,' 266,14 feet for a P.Q.B.; thence S 89°27'56" E 230.06 feet; thence S 00037'03" W, parallel to the 40-acre line; 64.0 feet; thence N 89°27'56".W 230,00 feet; thence N 00037'03" E, along the 40-acre line, 64.00 feet to the P.Q.B. LESS the Westerly 50.00 feet thereof for Road Right of Way. And That part of the. North '/, of the Northeast of the Northwest % of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, located according to the plat of Crystal Heights Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 28, Page 1, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the intersection of Bay Lane and State Road . No. 593, as shown on said plat, and running thence East along the South boundary, of Bay Lane 180 feet, thence South parallel to the middle line of said Road No. 593, 71 feet, thence West parallel to the South boundary of Bay Lane, 180 feet to the East boundary of Road No. 593, thence North along the East boundary 71 feet to the Point of Beginning. CDB Meeting Date: October 17,.2000 ' Case #: LUZ 00-08-09 Agenda Item #:. C. 2, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES'ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT ' GENERAL INFORMATION OWNERS: Thomas Kelly Michael A. Ciaramello ' LOCATION: 107'& 111 McMullen Booth Road Generally located on the southeast corner of the intersection of McMullen Booth Road and Bay Lane, approximately 200 feet south of Drew Street. ' PIN:. 16129116/000001210/0400 . 16129116/00000/21010500 REQUEST: To amend the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL), and To rezone from County Residential, Single Family (R-3) zoning district to the Office (O) district, SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 24,300 square feet or 0.56 acres Dimensions of property: f 35ft, frontage by 180 ft. (combined lots) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Single-Family Residential & Duplex Proposed Use: Office PLAN CATEGORY: Current Category: Residential Urban Proposed Category: Residential/Office. Limited, i Si .• ZONING DISTRICT: Current District: Single Family Residential (R-3)/County Proposed District: Office (O) EXISTING SURROUNDING USES: North: Single Family Residential South: Single Family Residential East: Single Family Residential West: Vacant (Church Proposed) ANALYSIS Introduction This plan amendment and rezoning application are requested by the property owners to allow office redevelopment of these parcels for two separate offices. The application involves two lots and two separate owners/applicants. The subject properties are currently developed with a duplex and single family residential home respectively. The site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of McMullen Booth Road and Bay Lane, approximately 200 feet south of Drew Street. Issues related to the site design will be addressed in the development review phase and may require Community Development Board approval. 1. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan in support of the proposed land use amendment are as indicated below: 2.4 Objective -- Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Land Development Code. 2.4.1 Policy - The development or redevelopment of small parcels [less than (1) acre] which are currently receiving an adequate Level-of-Service shall be specifically encouraged by administration of land development and concurrency management regulatory systems as a method of promoting urban infill. The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. 11. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN Applicable regulations from the Countywide Plan are as follows: . 2.3.3.4.1 Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) LUZ 00-08-09 2 Pur ose - It is the purpose of this category to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in an office and/or low density residential use; and to recognize such areas as well-suited for such limited mixed use consistent with the surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. Locational Characteristics - This category is generally appropriate to locations where it would serve as a transition from more intensive non-residential use to low density residential or less intensive public/semi-public use, and in areas where a combination of office and residential use is established or is determined appropriate as a means of encouraging reuse and neighborhood scale conversion. These areas are typically in close proximity to and served by the collector and arterial highway network. This site is located along the McMullen Booth Scenic Corridor and is designated Residential by the County in the Countywide Scenic Corridor Plan. The Residential scenic corridor classification will allow the Residential/Office Limited land use plan designation. However, this is the only single-family homes between Drew Street and Gulf-to-Bay fronting McMullen Booth Road which is primarily characterized by mixed type of uses including institutional, commercial, office and residential. A change in land use will not impact the character of the scenic corridor. The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the Countywide Plan. III. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY McMullen Booth Road Corridor The McMullen Booth Road corridor in this area between Gulf to Bay Boulevard and SR590 is characterized by mixed types of development including commercial uses at the major intersections with the exception of the Drew intersection and institutional and residential uses in between. The subject property is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of McMullen Booth Road and south of Drew Street. The Countywide Future Land Use Plan has designated land in this area of McMullen Booth Road as Residential Urban, Institutional, Residential Low Medium, Residential Medium and Commercial General. The area to the west side of McMullen Booth Road in this area has designated land use categories of Commercial General, Institutional, Residential/Office Limited and Residential Urban. There is a vacant land immediately to the west of the subject property that has been reviewed for a change from Residential Urban land use category to Institutional. The land use review process is still in progress with the Department of Community Affairs and the Pinellas Planning Council. In addition, the proposed Residential/Office Limited land use and Office zoning district are determined to be appropriate for this location as a way of encouraging property reuse and conversion in the light of the location of the subject site and its adverse traffic impact to the residents in relationship to McMullen Booth Road. Tile subject site is the only property in this area that fronts McMullen Booth Road with back out traffic to this major L.UZ ()()-08-()9 3 i thoroughfare, Consequently, there are safety problems/concerns to the residents. The site is also in close proximity to a proposed church which ,is only 210 feet on the west side of the subject property. Moreover, the intended office use will be less intensive and in character with the existinb surrounding uses in the area. The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning will be compatible with the existing surrounding uses and future land use. Immediate Surrounding Area The Future Land Use Plan(FLUP) for the immediate surrounding area along McMullen Booth Road includes a proposed Institutional use to the west (First Baptist Church) which is currently vacant while the north, south and east are characterized by Residential Urban. The proposed Future Land Use of Residential/Office Limited is in character with the overall FLUP designation along this area. The existing surrounding uses include a proposed church to the west, single family residential to the north, south 'and east of the subject site. The proposed land use amendment is compatible with surrounding uses due to the similarity of future and existing uses with the proposed land use. V. SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Roadways The subject site is approximately 0.56 acres and would allow for four single-family residential homes based on a density of 7.5 units per acre in the current Residential. Urban and County zoning district. New Development Maximum F.A.R. Single Family Church Clinic Medical Office Proposed Office Existing Zoning: Units 4 Avg. Daily Vehicle Trips 38 PM Peak Vehicle Trips 4 Proposed Office Zoning: Square Feet - N/A 9,720 9,720 9,720 Avg. Daily Vehicle Trips - N/A 86 351 111 PM Peak Vehicle Trips - N/A 14 42 15 NIA - Not Applicable Source: ITT Trip Generation Alannal, 6th lid., 1997 Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance LUZ 00-08-09 4 z ' Maximum development potential under the proposed Office zoning district, providing all other district regulations are met, is 9,720 square feet of office, medical clinic or church, based on a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.40 or a combination of all of the above uses. However, it is highly unlikely that the above uses would be able to be developed as intensely as the above table reflects due to Community Development Code requirements and site planning constraints. The more intense uses in the Office zoning district have been analyzed for the amount of vehicle trips that could be generated based on maximum development potential. Based on the institute of Transportation Engineer's manual and the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, the medical clinic use would generate the most vehicle trips daily (351) and PM Peak Hour vehicle trips (42). The Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation guideline for the R/OL Future Land Use Plan category on the next table more accurately portrays potential traffic generation. This guideline is used by the PPC to review transportation impacts of proposed Land Use Plan amendments. MAXIMUM POTENTIAL TRAFFIC McMullen Booth Road Current Existing Proposed ' PPC Situation Zoning Zoning Guidelines Maximum Daily Added Potential Trips N/A 38 351 67 Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Trips N/A 4 42 8* Volume of McMullen Booth from Drew Street to SR 60 60,526 60,564 60,877 60,593 LOS of McMullen Booth from Drew to SR 60 C C C C Volume of Drew from US 19 to McMullen Booth Rd. 17,950 17,988 18,301 18,017 LOS of Drew from US 19 to McMullen Booth Rd. D D D D NIA = Not Applicable LOS = Level-of-Service * = City Calculation of 12.5% Source: ITE Trip Generation 1lanual, 61h Ed, 1997 Pinellas County Transportation Impact Ifee Ordinance Pinellas County MPO Level of Service 1999 "The Rules" of the Countv?vide Future Land Use Plan The 2000 Transportation Level of Service manual from the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization assigned the McMullen Booth Road segment from Drew Street to Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard an LOS of C and the Drew Street segment from McMullen Booth Road to US Highway 19 a level of service (LOS) of D. The McMullen Booth segment is physically constrained with no planned capacity enhancements planned. ART-PLAN, a computer traffic analysis model provided by FDOT, indicates Drew Street will not fall below the acceptable LOS of D. The peak traffic generation of the proposed development will generally occur during off peal: hours, decreasing the congestion on the road network. The level-of- service for McMullen Booth Road will not be degraded by the proposed land use amendment and rezoning. Although medical clinic results in the higher number of trips, the more likely use of the property is general office which would result in 15 new peak hour trips which in relationship to the existing volume of 60,526 trips is de-minimis. Due to the small size of the site and the small number of additional trips, the potential effect on McMullen Booth Road is expected to be negligible. LUZ 00-08-09 5 f 4 Mass Transit The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The total miles of fxed,route servide will not change; the subject site is located within IK mile of an existing transit route; and headways are less than or equal to one hour, Pinellas Suncoast 'T'ransit Authority(PSTA) bus service is available along McMullen Booth Road. Water The current zoning district could demand approximately 800 gallons per day at a rate of 300gallons/day for the single family home and 500 gallon/day for the duplex. Under the proposed zoning district, water demand could approach approximately 972 gallons per day. The proposed amendment will not affect the City's current LOS for water since there: is excess capacity. Wastewater The current zoning district could demand approximately 640 gallons of wastewater per day. Under the proposed zoning district, sewer demand could approach approximately 778 gallons per day. The proposed amendment will not affect the City's current LOS for wastewater since there is excess capacity. Solid Waste The current zoning could result in 16 tons of solid waste per year. Under the proposed zoning district, there would be approximately 2.8 tons of solid waste generated per year. The proposed amendment will not affect the City's current LOS for solid waste disposal since there is excess capacity. Recreation and Open Space The proposed land use amendment and rezoning will not impact the LOS of recreational acreage or facilities due to the proposed non-residential land use and zoning classification. V. ' IMPACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Prior to redevelopment of the subject property, site plan approval will be required. At that time, the stormwater management system will be required to meet all City and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) stormwater management criteria. Significant trees currently on the property will be retained to the best ability possible in conjunction with the Community Development Code requirements for parking. The site is not located within an environmentally sensitive area. The proposed land use amendment will not have a negative impact on the natural environment. LUZ OU-0"9 6 1 VI. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS Existing vs. Proposed Regulations - Maximum Development Potential Floor Area Ratio Impervious Surface F.A..R, Ratio I.S.R. Existing County Land Use 0.10 0.65 Proposed Office Zoning 0.40 0.75 The proposed office zoning district permits an F.A.R. of 0.40 and I.S.R. of 0.75, while the existing Residential Urban land use has an F.A.R. of 0.40 and I.S.R. of 0.65, although F.A.R. applies only to non-residential uses. The I.S.R. of the proposed Office district is more intensive at 0.75 than the existing land use which allows an I.S.R. of 0.65. The entire parcel will meet size requirements for the proposed district and office use, as well as most other uses in the Office zoning district, Approval of this land use plan amendment and zoning district designation does not guarantee the right to develop on the subject property. Transportation concurrency j must be met, and the property owners will have to comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested. The existing and proposed use of this property is consistent with the Office zoning district regulations. VII. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS There are no current code enforcement violations nor any code enforcement history on this site. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed Residential/Office Limited land use and Office zoning district is determined to be appropriate for this location as a way of encouraging property reuse and conversion. The area is in close proximity to a proposed church on the west side of McMullen Booth Road and served by the collector and arterial highway network. Moreover, the subject site is the only property in this area that fronts McMullen Booth Road with back out traffic to this major thoroughfare. Consequently, there are safety problems to the residents. The RIOL zoning district is well suited for limited mixed uses consistent with the surrounding uses. The proposed development will be consistent with an approved site plan which will be required to include landscaping plan and parking layout relative to the proposed office use. The intended. use will eliminate safety problems associated with back out traffic to McMullen Booth Road and also promote the welfare of the residents. LUZ 00-08-09 7 Finally; the proposed Residential/Office Limited land use and Office (O) zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of the public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent. with the development regulations of the City. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the following actions on this application: Amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of the subject site from Residential Urban to ResidentiaVOMce Limited; and 2. Amend the zoning district designation of the subject site from County (R- 3), Single Family Residential zoning district to City (O), Office zoning district. Prepared by: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner Attachments Application Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Existing Surrounding Uses Existing Zoning At Proposed Zoning Atlas. Existing Land Use Map Proposed Land Use Map LUZ U0-08-09 8 r Location Map -9LqlMllkhh, Mrcha&A. Ciw mello & .Thomas Kelly NORTH 107& 111Nc11fuffen Booth Road N. 1 r' =1320' LUZ 00-08-09 TEIS IS NOT A SURVEY © c APLiE r? a ? ? ?? ,2 5AN UV ? ? It 0 1V/ L/ 7i ? 1?r-?711w I1?1]?uJ•1??I??, /f/ I?? _ ? Rut!! Ecf nd Holl Or / Jf? \.. / ? ?? ?mf Q GLEN 0" ,a i SAN i JOSE y ST wi ?\] PC?6R0^?? [[?PROJECT ;4r ? ?, BERNAA?HOw ? 5T? SITE r--- I ------- -, rtv*l A?7. ? ? f?? L y 0" BORpCALIa lA f1+-...?? `elf 6' 1 V VV L V BAY •CAX ?j SAHQLEwG(? 51 a DAY LA feulnr?ru Y LH[SAFE AKL ST IP w?r['MN ?Cirrelnnd 1 ? ? Perry LP s C It nr'g PARKWAY a w V'AGHIAey11??-IME meEM V? ? ._a COM++?HG GlArET 7E Y ti'R Ilti fll,r.',U?ru 3: CITY O CLEARWATER, FLORIDA E'UE31.1C 1Y()EtKS AE)AiEN1S'E'IZA'I'ION ENGINEEIRING I, , Clearwater City Clbmmission worksession Item #: a Agenda fiver Mmorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: November 16.00 SUET/RW-0MMENDA110N: • Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendments for 2014 Poinsetta Avenue; Owner: Yanith Kheang. MORON: APPROVE the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment from County Residential Urban to City Residential Urban and Zoning Atlas Amendment from County Zoning District Residential, One, Two and Three (R-4) Family District to City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Zoning District for 2014 Poinsetta Avenue (Lot 10, Block O, Brooklawn Subdivision) and PASS Ordinances No. 6616-00, 6617-00 & 6618-00 on first reading. (CC ANX 00-09-14) ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. Sit M M ARY: This site is located at 2014 Poinsetta Avenue, on the west side of Poinsetta Avenue, approximately. 100 feet east of Betty Lane. The purpose of the annexation is to allow the City of Clearwater to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the April 28, 1986 Agreement to Annex (ATA) between the City and previous owners. Effective with the annexation, the City will collect open space impact fees of $200.00 from the current property owner. The current use of the property is residential and the site is approximately 0.12 acres in size. The property is now served by the City of Clearwater water and sanitary sewer service pursuant to the agreement to annex. The property owner is aware of the payment of the outstanding open space impact fee which is due prior to the second reading. The' Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: • The proposed annexation will not have an adverse impact on public facilities and their level of service. • The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide Plan and the Community Development Code. • The proposed annexation is contiguous to existing municipal boundaries, represents a logical extension of the boundaries and does not create an enclave. i? '`: Reviewed by: Originating Dept-f/ f Costs Legal Info Svc N/A PLANNING DEP?Fl4c1+ i fT Fatal AL-j (ETIM S UDO ) Budget N/A Public NIA User Dept. 1? Funding Source: Works P- Purchasing NIA DCM/ACM Current CI FY Rsk Mgmt NIA Other Attachments OP ORDINANCES NO. 6616-00, Other 6617-00 & 6618-00 STAFF REPORT Submitted by ' '" #jJ06,40W city Manager OA,, 0 None 1 Appropriation Code: printed an receded i}aner Fav. 2198 .'t'',t 'L -. .. •' F 1, F^'1{•' • .. 1'L• .L • ,' .' ' • 1 I ' - e • . ' I . .. _'.?F?.., ,:ji•}s :2 .. - „ :TF?^r?tl;.?. ..'4....t ?`fd?sxii`.'hl'-"?i`.' .. .°:f a'c'r, ? +i t' .., T"'e?:'. .• .. ._.. ia'? `r' 'r .... CC ANX 00-09-14 -- Yanith Kheang November 16,' 2000 Page 2 , 4 F Since the proposed annexation site is less than ten acres. the annexation will not require the review of the Pinellas i : Planning Council. 4 The Planning Department determined that the proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning applications are consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code; • The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning application are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • The potential range of uses and the specific proposed use are compatible with the surrounding area, i Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. The applications will not have amadverse impact on the natural, environment. Pursuant to,the Interlocal Agreement with Pinellas County, review by the Pinellas Planning Council will not be required.for the plan amendment. i The Community Development Board reviewed these applications at their public hearing meeting of October 17, ' 2000 recommended approval of all applications. ORDINANCE NO. 6616-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POINSETTA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET EAST OF BETTY LANE, CONSISTING OF LOT 10, BLOCK O, BROOKtAWN SUBDIVISION, LESS THE EAST 5 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2014 POINSETTA AVENUE INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto 'as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: Lot 10, Block O, of Brocklawn Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 59, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. (ANX 00-09-14) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: I Leslie K. Dougall-Sid Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6616-00 ^ to o Vn°. 2 0 2 1 O 3 16 a ? ti ti n! .. ry ? .nEC 3 ? 2QS5 1 1 1 ? -? St BERMUDA STPEE1 o 50 ti n n d 12 11 7 ?MU ry c N ;? 1 n ?? y .17 A 2018 v 2047 6 1 5 16 1 7 1 25 1I J 6 F 0 206 7 5 "59-247 ? 048 26 77 - - 6" -14 7•1 3 7•Inr - 13 1.5 ii 2' 2-3 2039 14 LL .] i 9 N L IO 0, 8 5 In zas. 1 r .? ry ID1_EWILD w? L aRlVE 12 ti , 7 1 11 ,,'. 9 ~ 24x1 ' 1026 d \` ?1."070 2 _2 _ . 1Q . $ 10 10 1 1 d 9 r 3 ? 9 2022 z 7 1 ??027 3 \ 1028 LO . 1 0 , 'a,zd 2021 d 9 202•r 202t 4 10 ` d 16 15 14 , z , o 11 z020 so s ., = a ? C° " to H 13 N 2022 $ 5 zols [3 20J7 . • 'r 11 2Q to 5 0. '5 lb 7 ` . to h 7 N y Cj 12 0 6 1") r 60 w b to to t% ^ e. ?v ACE #J[TI?11 \ 1999 7 - 23 ; ? : I L?QT4±?a tss7 . 2 M 14 15 16 17 1 1 9 20 2, 22 z ? '. ?•? . T9s? ? 12 10`• S. .8 ' 6 t1 F 5 -4 3 2 4n N • to. CO ? N Ql N o? 14 1092, ? , ,• N M SEDEEVA - CjR r _ f!#' :.: , ' 2 rays 6 ''. 5784-1294 T 5: 1 g ?'yd?A?c. ,a0 npl. . • 15 1961 O J9s" 1968 w ' n 07 N 42 41, 44 43 S 13 =t0 38 3 ' 36. . 78 JvG 15 45 41i 47 48 49 f 5 0+ 51 '?71 l9Fi7 . r 4 m Ra 33 N + N r Z 4 4a"i J .,r 6z ! , Qs7101 + q 3. 6692-ZZG .5 4 _ 576 1226 2A _ 204 o Z: S ? 13 7 s 1 r 00014' 8 ? ' E 15 9 '""` 8 so l 0171 ?i a7 '. GD . 19 rsRT $ 17 20 21 22 1079 3D 18 00 6909-1620 7a3 3-s+s 24 23 122 21 20 ,5 16 4'•t 5 GARD 14 •. 7. a 9 1 1 •. i WOODLp'WN i Fl 6 7 8 , /0 it 10 J95B U w BERTLAND WAY ° PAaK ,1 PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: Yanith Kheang Case: _ A`JX 00-09--. ii ADDRESS' 2014 Poq-)Settia "+v:'nue Clearwater, rlcrida PROPERTY DESCRIPTION' Lot P), iJI ;C? 0, tirocl=-lr wn cur, FROM: LAND USE PLAN ZONING Residenh(il Urbarl R- 1 leg tn?_ cat ?' tf?r rprd R/'+`l` PROPERTY SIZE ACMES: T0: R?sirienticl ufbcr1 Right-o#-way Size Acres: ATLAS PAGE: 2151L: _ SEC: TWP: 2295 RANGE. 1.,r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: ? ..:•:r.r r; eCq i CITY COMMISSION: 3:xhib-it "A" Ordinance NO. 6616-00 ORDINANCE N0,6617-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POINSETTA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET EAST OF BETTY LANE, CONSISTING OF LOT 10, BLOCK O, BROOKLAWN SUBDIVISION, LESS THE EAST 5 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2014 POINSETTA AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL URBAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Property Lot 10, Block O, Brooklawn Subdivision, according To the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 59, Public Records of Pinellas County, FL (ANX 00-09-14) Land Use Category Residential Urban Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6616-00, and subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Appr ved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant'City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest'. Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 10 ¦ Ordinance No. 6617-00 20 BERMUDA STREET K an `^ n I? n ?' !. X29 15 16 17 5 yG 26 7 2 .3 ?nr4 15 ?.1•'224 LL 1.'? IN r 2 10 3 r6 a 1 161. 3 2 zoss3 4... ..?„1[ 'b lr ex,.91u` 11 s-r 5r E 057 4 `1 3 .i 12 50 204P 5 i 1 607j 12 A 5 4 41 '. nD . "1048 576U-1726 2063 5 *A_207 W <D•r.r 6 `?` Z 5 206L'13 7j 6 2433 '? Q 1 14. t?! r 0001 J3 $ F 15 9 60 lmvl? i p IDLEWILD aR! - 2D2(r ; 12 1 7 1 11 i 9 in >_ 7\ 1 11030 209! 2 2 1 ? 7 8 1 pzOZS u ,n 9 11 Z02Z z 2027 3 10-°.0-28 202 20,7af LL 2021 4 9 2024 2041 4 1 o?U2D 4 ` 87,7 16 15 1 1 z02D 60 = Z ?v 5 2022 L7 rJ.. 1 t O 7 w M w 13 2D Is 2017 5, 2010 a1 7 N 12 60 0? fi -------------- ACE ?v h w `? m 1999: l¦ 1 014,004 a .. 7 3 N N 23 ?' 1°s?e4??t?'° 1.997 M a 14 15 16 17 1 19 20 21 22 2 24 J 199{ 6 5 4 3 2 1-•.? ?: 1Y3 ao ty 14 to m Si"l7EEVA'? .C?RCL '• .N' -'• .?" s?9s8 .15. ?`?'?p? D soLi 15 y 1964 . ca 196:' D Q 1960 LLI rse . ?? ? '. ? ? ?.. N nomn" N °? " N N ? • • ? y ; ' ' rf 42 41 .371, 36 44 4 S B 40 3,9 .. . 78 ? e 3a . rs 47 48 15 -7 ' 51 . ? 45 36 49 50. 7r !96 n N n "N N ! ?: m h o N J3 . A '? 60 19818: 17 7d 21 22 1979 ? • 3d 1 $ vU o f .1•. 24 ?3 22 21 20 J. 3• 16 • 15 ?`. GA 14- s ? s ? 1 i? %VOODLA'WN 1 } 1 6 7 e ti0 11 10 6909-162 7333-616 . 11 r9sel v o BERTLVJD- " r WAY .0 PARK PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: Yonith Kheong Case: ANX 00--09--14 ADDRESS: 2014 Poins,'tha A'1•2rir1e Clecr'NOter, Florida PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ? Lot 10. Eiof-_? 0, DrookI(i?,vn 'Sub LAND USE PLAN ZONING has-_- ih.a 7OSi :J ?' rnr rood P, AI/ ?. FROW Residentrni Urb,n PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: ----- - TO: Residential Urban L%Ic = i - --- _ _ _ Right-of-Way Size Acres: ATLAS PAGE: 2? 14 I SEC: TWP: ? RANGE: 1 ?t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD'17, _CN CITY COMMISSION: tm Ordinance No. 6617-00 3 ORDINANCE NO. 6618-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POINSETTA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET EAST OF BETTY LANE,. CONSISTING OF LOT 10, BLOCK O, BROOKLAWN SUBDIVISION, LESS THE EAST 5 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT OF, WAY, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2014 POINSETTA AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Property Zoning District Lot 10, Block O, Brooklawn Subdivision, according Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) To the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 59, public records of Pinellas County, FL (ANX 00-09-14) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6616-00. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-Sid Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 6618-00 OWNER: Yonitla Kheong ADDRESS: 20'1,1 Poinsettia Avenue Clearwater, rlcrsdc LAND USE PLAN ZONING FROM: Residenticl Urban - z TO: Resident',d Llrbcrn I_?ICR ATLAS PAGE: ?S1rr Case: NX 00--00-14 PROPERTY ?ESGRIPTION: L'at ',O. 11,, 0, E-1roCk1 o',vn 1b I .1? Eosk J' for rnod P/lol/ PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: Right-of-way Size Acres: SEC: _ TWA: RANGE: . ?? COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARi?: r:ctJCer r'. -?CC3 CITY COMMISSION: Ordinance 6618-00 I PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION I r CUB Meeting Date October 17, 2000 Case No. ANX 00-09-14 Agenda Item: C. 6. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFFREPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER(S): Yanith Kheang APPLICAN'T': City of Clearwater (Pursuant to Agreement to Annex dated April 28, 1986) LOCATION: 2014 Poinsetta Avenue, on the west side of Poinsetta Avenue, approximately 100 feet east of Betty Lane. REQUEST: To annex the property into the City of Clearwater in accordance with the provisions of approved Agreement to Annex and approve the appropriate City land use plan category and zoning district. SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 5,320 square feet or 0.12 acres Dimensions of property: Lot width of 56 feet by 95 feet deep PROPERTY USE Current Use: Single family residential Proposed Use: Single family residential PLAN CATEGORY Current County Plan Category: Residential Urban Proposed City Plan Category: Residential Urban ZONING DISTRICT Current County Zoning District: Residential, One, Two and three Family district (R-4) Proposed City Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential District (LMDR) BACKGROUND INFORMATION : On April 28, 1986, the previous owner of this property entered into an Agreement to Annex (ATA) the subject property with the City of Clearwater in order to connect to the f CDB ANX 00-09-14 October 17, 2000 Page 2 City sewer and water facilities. At that time, the subject property was located outside the' municipal boundaries of the City of Clearwater and did not meet the adjacency requirements for a voluntary annexation. The terms and provisions of that agreement are binding upon the previous owners, their successors, assigns, or any subsequent owner of this property. It was agreed that at such time as it would become possible for the City to annex the property, that the ATA would constitute an application to annex at that time. The subject property is now contiguous to the existing city boundaries to the east of this property. The City was also required to give the property owner 60 days written notice of its intent to annex this property. This requirement has been met and a notice letter was sent to the current property owner on June 28, 2000. The notice expired on August 29, 2000. Moreover, the agreement provided that the owner of the property at the time it was to be officially annexed, will pay the City of Clearwater a one time payment of two hundred dollars ($200.00). The fee is the property's fair share of its impact on open space and the funds are earmarked for the maintenance of an acceptable level of open space required to promote the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Clearwater. The open space fee is based on the City's Recreation and Open Space impact fee ordinance originally adopted on July 7, 1983. The current owner of the property is Yanith Klieang. ANALYSIS The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request in order to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and conditions established in the ATA agreement of April 28, 1986. The subject property is now contiguous with the existing City boundaries and it is consistent with the Florida statutes with regard to the requirements for voluntary annexation. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Urban and it is proposed to be zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). The subject property is an existing single family residential home. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES Water and Sewer The City of Clearwater has been providing water service to the subject property since April 28, 1986, and capacity for the project continues to be available for this utility. Therefore, this annexation will not have any effect on public facilities. In addition, the City's ability to serve the overall site had previously been documented through the previous ATA annexation agreement. Moreover, the previous owner had paid the required assessment fee applicable at that time. CDB ANX 00-09-14 October 17, 2000 Page 3 Solid Waste Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's. Resource Recovery Plant and capacity is available to serve the property. Police: The property is located within the West Police District and service will be administered through the District 2 Station located at 645 Pierce Street. Community policing service will be provided through the City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect police service and response time. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to the property by Station 945 located at 610 Pierce Street. The Fire Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time. In summary, the proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public facilities and their level of service. 11. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan designate the site as Residential Urban whose intent is to recognize an urban area as primarily well suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities and natural resources of such area. Residential uses are the primary uses in this plan category up to a maximum of 7.5 dwelling units per acre. Other permissible uses in the Residential Urban plan category include Public/Semi-Public uses, schools, ancillary non-residential and Recreation/ Open Space uses. The annexation does not propose to change the Residential Urban plan category and the proposed use is consistent with the uses and density of this plan category. Further, the annexation promotes infill development as stated in Objective 2.4 of the Future Land Use Plan: f, CDB ANX 00-09-14 October 17, 2000 Page 4 . 2.4 Objective - In considering extension of service and facilities, Clearwater shall actively encourage Infill development. In summary, the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan both in the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies of the Plan. 5 III. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY . DEVELOMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS The appropriate zoning district under the new Community Development Code is the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District whose dimensional requirements are consistent with the surrounding development on this site. The application for annexation covers an existing detached dwelling unit. Detached dwelling units are required to have a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet in the LMDR zoning district. The subject property has a lot size'of 5,320 square feet which exceeds the minimum lot size requirement 'of the LMDR zoning district. In addition, a review of the dimensions of the subject property with a width of 56 feet and a depth of 95 feet indicates that the site meets the dimensional requirements of the LMDR district as a standard development. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN There is no change requested in the Comprehensive Plan category of the site that will remain Residential Urban with a maximum density of 7.5 units per acre. According to Special Act 88-464 which established the Pinellas Planning Council, annexations of less than 10 acres do not require the review of the Council nor of the Countywide Planning Authority. Therefore, due to the small size of this property, review by the Pinellas Planning Council is not required. There are no other Countywide Plan policies applicable to this application. V. CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA LAW Florida Statutes require that a proposed annexation be both contiguous with the existing municipal boundaries and compact in its concentration (Florida Statutes Chapter I71). This property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the east of the property and represents a logical extension of the existing boundaries. The compact standard of Florida law requires that the annexation does not create an enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries. The annexation of this property is consistent with this standard and no new enclave will be created by annexation of this property. In summary, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law. 1 CDB ANX 00-09-14 October 17, 2000 Page 5 f, f VI. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS The response from the Community Response Team (CRT) indicates that there is a dilapidated fence at this site and that the property is overgrown with grass. The Community Response Team will work with the property owner to bring the property into compliance, with the City Community Development Code following the annexation. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request in order to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and conditions established in the ATA agreement of April 28, 1985. The City has been providing water service to the subject property since April 28, 1986 and capacity continues to be available for this utility. Therefore the proposed annexation of this property will not affect the provision of public facilities. The proposed annexation and the existing use are consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. The existing and future use of this site as a single family residential home is consistent with the LMDR zoning district. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. -The payment of $200.00 is due to the City on November 1, 2000 prior to the adoption of the associated ordinances on December 7, 2000 by the City Commission. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the request: 1. Recommend APPROVAL of the annexation of the property located at 2014 Poinsetta Avenue. 2. Recommend APPROVAL of the Residential Urban plan category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Recommend APPROVAL of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. Prepared by: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner ?' r6 ,f Location Map Yanith Khewg NORTH 2014 Poh2setdo A venue 1 1320' AAW OO-09--14 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY _ S F C_ ]• g ?,?KP? SC0 ? ? JOAN ST iAKE/Kq OR A -Elzo r pR? K aS 1? ] lIAANd13 PR KNOLLNOOO kT ST JAMES sr Y w M/O1Q1A se ¢ .LWES sr INLLMOOD DR ABEr1Gf.Llr S cl aia ?LYK3K PST x LM+OHURS? 1740fuRST Sf Lm "VAST ? 1-1 ? 000000 CT ll P Rin nlnFn_ LACYaJE Sr I If IP PROJECT SITE ?soI?o A LA 5 s7 D Q -? J TV SANOr LA y ix 43U-l i•- ?Y-L-EAS?JHf MOHAMN J ' NA 1y Il JI ?J -L1URsrC C,n1 C ROXMOf1T OR cr 4 RAC£ r'?'gG CITY OF CLEARWATEl2, FLORIDA IS PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ' Clearwater Gty (II111111551(7n Worksesskan item #: Q Agenda Cbver Ikmorandum Final Agenda Item # 1 Meeting Date: November 16,00 19U1i3, MT1Fd=MMENDATtON: + Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendments for 1708 E. EL Trinidad Drive; Owners: Christine L. Thacker & Jack L. Thacker. MOTION: APPROVE the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment from County Residential Low to City Residential Low and Zoning Atlas Amendment from County Zoning District Residential, Single Family (R-3) District to City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Zoning District for 1708 E. EL Trinidad Drive ( Lot 3, Block 2, Virginia Grove Terrace) and PASS Ordinances No. 6622-00, 6623-00 & 6624-00 on first reading. (CC ANX 00-09-17) © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY- This site is located at 1706 E. EL Trinidad Drive, on the west side of Trinidad Drive, approximately 230 feet north of State Road 590. The purpose of the annexation is to allow the City of Clearwater to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the November 14, 1984 Agreement to Annex (ATA) between the City and previous owners. Effective with the annexation, the City will collect open space impact fees of $200.00 from the current property owner. The current use of the property is residential and the site is approximately 0.18 acres in size. The property is now served by the City of Clearwater water and sanitary sewer service pursuant to the agreement to annex. The property owner is aware of the payment of the outstanding open space impact fee which is due prior to the second reading. The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: + The proposed annexation will not have an adverse impact on public facilities and their level of service. • The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide Plan and the Community Development Code. • The proposed annexation is contiguous to existing municipal boundaries, represents a logical extension of the boundaries and does not create an enclave. Reviewed by: Originating Dept* Costs Legal Info Svc NIA Q PLANNING D T Total l J"1? f`_ (EfIM S UD ` Budget NIA Public NIA User Dept K Funding Source: Works W Purchasing NIA DCMIACM Current CI FY Risk Mgmt NIA Other Attachments OP ORDINANCES NO, 6622-00, Other 6623-00 & 6624-00 STAFF REPORT Submitted by: , City Manager 40,t-4? D None Appropriation Code: 1 Printed. r,,M d oamer Rev. 2198 CC ANX 00-09-17 - Christine & Jack L. Thacker November 16, 2000 Page 2 Since the proposed annexation site Is less than ten acres, the annexation will not require the review of the Pinellas Planning Council. The Planning,Department determined that the proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning.applications are consistent with-the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning application are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • The potential range of uses and the specific proposed use are compatible with the surrounding area. • Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. • The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment. Pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement with Pinellas County, review by the Pinellas Planning Council will not be required for the plan amendment. The Community Development Board reviewed these applications at their public hearing meeting of October 17, 2000 recommended approval of all applications. ORDINANCE NO. 6622-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF E. EL TRINIDAD DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET NORTH OF STATE ROAD 590, CONSISTING OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, VIRGINIA GROVE TERRACE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1708 EAST EL TRINIDAD DRIVE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION;, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map. attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: Lot 3, Block 2, Virginia Grove Terrace as recorded in Plat Book 37, Page 29, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (ANX 00-09-17) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: ve-4 (-,e(- *9V Leslie K. Dougail-Side Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6622-00 $';. ?. _1 -11 1 -11, , - ' 1' ?w 43717_1 1R t. 1 ?{r,? s4. 1.} l75t . ;? Lf- 1,3 27 f7. Ci4% n7 17G0 T 'f [ O 17.71. 0 ,,?....1i 7u8., 1755I754 }• r •.:'?,.: ?7]I`-:(3'ii'J. •"r-,?r,?T?f01 'a •*;., r :. .s[,•i',':.?1. '?` lA's•7/ ``'f ? Q wr .`,.. +`''`i.?,l,?' ,74J;',f? ,t't?er ? 12?7 {C?"???"'^;-•f.?° t•1?•? i ?; A49jif6?!,??d?.?'?•.... i 1??'r.?a.,i;?. _ }._ 1 d !'? I Q .l,l JI('il}f•, ? L by r ?:." ? 1 :??' Y ?S' .:. -?. wC ??a' x?''••11• > r :'• • - Ji.l'i •?,.'1 li I"' r r"'I.'f.'` :r lI' I:%Y•' ;?: r.igr: _, ; ', ,l;?i ? ,,?.? r' {.'r•n• 't., :?: ?? ?:`io ==; .' r.,;tat? .•- .i ?1 Ea z , .+..> 1440 {tr' •,.. 17' fit ::a?, 1?1J?''x rr r: ``? ?_„ ?i , . ?.?i'YAf- •A?,, (} i r.l Q 7. - }..j?14$ _r •1 774.? !7411 l7• ?°?!•`1' "l '?/?? t1'f73z' '; ':,?? •rGO-''{{15? ^,: r•.? '(r. Yff•Ft ,?„i'•nv? `f7JG• 173$ nr :?•1:W fr.,J 11, ?i) . 4q!?' ' t"`:7•..f :. ': tfl(r_ i?',•r•/1• .!^?f-F?, ) +7 ,.,! H:. r• rS O l' •tif{: ? fT73d;;'`-f•! r ? r'??.'?{7 f!- !0}. 1;711 ??i??"fi ":''.'.5' ??? is ?1,? •: .r?t;,•1,'•;` g g sGiivL?' •,r r., Iy V f il? ';• `f '?t. p,r !r .J. ., T •, ' - {{ r''•'?" 1? .c.. •r,:••.. J799' 1740 2378.1•' .i.l'?':5t•? rti'.?i,S TIl. ; A }Ault-136$ filOA-73 /? ri„i, ?'• 737 ?" ri.r?:. if''' $'; .• i','. ,:, • 3 A;:, rU' si'. 3 1 ?{ ?, tI ?:j7lt la.f?i 79L .•1.?' :1» 1 1;a7''"' '1 .,' ..? t3 r :,? +r; •':' {• 1•- 7117 ` 1729 '•••:..' ' 1178 ,j„ :17f9lf"' 173.1 17 35 1 61193';7 0104-739•A "A"' 1;'.:..Ill ' "'-'%.'`• 7$T.' f ?"° :Q .141 +,'•'x" ` ? 1:1 ';t'll°?!?i 7? a!"'I.cr(• .,t?? ?'/' i•, •5 ,.: ,'9Ls,9$,;r2y4s?'.. ';?.,,t, y{,.. ,.. Z I 12, 4•;' r? r.5. ` : ?r `° r t.. ?, ,r' r.., r ...? r•. f-. •- :r`.•...., ra•T7_-,'i''?' ? ' T = ' ?'? tr 7 1725 ' I ?7.''J." , : •.:• .,1730:', 17Z3 t 1 36 ` _ ?A 91C4L91Qj i 2?, tf . r,=.". :,?;'!:•..• r. _ 5.,? ti N: x' 7 !r t"1? {' • i:..a It' ''? t?-T /?mn'. ZI?r?• .,,?yyl' ?; •},? 'jam;.',':,.,. ti l,s...? .7'' 3 r.,•?:.i•oy 6 x 172$ ?y?, i;' i,ii: {66 ?:.1v;•I' Pf} = ••:+7 ?rrrl?l !`.' .i 7 . •. r. , ;.,. V r. v?.., .,,. r _ ?f".f• h't i,'1 µ Jf.r 'fI' 1 r V n;`. V' r?dsr ,5 ?O 25 1t'.,15r , tyS*' M .'r. :I FI.A `; 1 , 1:} ' , ' (`r. r.L a . si17c0• 4i tht't1-BS7 !. t]if7»?1A74'1, ?'77Z?!' Y.. C3 7 +]]] 5 7 litre •"314 ; r? r•..:,v• Cv.1 ?, • ?r. ,r l tiif•'_,..r A'tia7hT76?-•?.d J 1i:+s, 7.,>6 U o? 'C? id J 7''?. 4;+r} q'y+' s :#27?i 7 r YJ r 1 K '+i?,,_ tOt J;i• ?'r%• ' 'ry i Q 1' ?. ?;- 7?if W 0 F- i rl,f5n l?•3 }r.fl7fr Yli• .l?t yyr., '.r3?.,:r, e i Fi.^! hr1fJ ?: rJ ..+?r :•' i 3 5 s E+' .? ' '..411 s1'i .r ;.ur :7 x17.';•,.:1. .. .. , f'„?{r? lT?2 !q ,'` la -;,ti :1%l` ilt 6A5$^'.43^' t t1 ?5:.''• ?'" 7-g 04a 684 r IF- ..J•. .?., v?CI t.;, _ N c p, ?• ,•, ra•a. .:'? -,.. ?• +y. ". ti ,.?`A'.•' 1'T '? § ,^; 1',.• ?1:/ ` '•;• i . J '4y'17?1" r m { 1 : z' Y•ST, hr N '? 7'e 14J" :I'Tx`,a"•?' +: Yrti-: f`:?;1: 17,f3c.st.`.?s g: 'Y` #„af_IiQ1i .'7`1.1715 ti'rr{ •.nt.tr ti $i?r rJ4 ?Xrc?l r$r' r i"p ,u f?''1 ,u,: "'i''? j? ?r lS 174t3,"wft:f ? ;ri o5T JOHN f tF J t tt .. .t , . ,A., ?h.d;:G,f y !t7,.!• ?r, ?.. •??y n•' *ti'+•'? I? +' y'{ • I ? ?, ^ v"i5 i' ? t n [Y I?:i, 1 f c} { ' ?i ' •< ?1 'f r T t, phi ? J11fF ?bl??'. \ iC?. f'?j '?• 7: F 4??.r':, ?+?! j,, 'i. ' i'''aC;i y ,r, c. x.?. `?i r Y1$. 1711 i e, ' yrl'+f 2 ? _T '?1 .ti jy"••• -f r i }'t `Ira F.7v a' fi?if . - few* i< Il?'Tm ; rN ilt'!:'.C4s ry ?.f?,.Y' ,I ? ?, Y r S I .If r .tom . 2 ??•1 1 ,R? i? ,I?`1 ,? c t:'S'{4d? ?.c t•. i"3 yi? •J.'."r: Y.r G X1.4 i? 1 ,r /f.••' ra '• i'yft'rt S i ?'T l:r. ,' , t ?.r ,rtt at' ?, ,e,l r;• ?'a'. .? t? 't ,? 2 3,i 'j,: Zr•??sl..., f T•?j T r1 r• t717fT1 CI.EARWA IE1' t 77,..77• vJf Z }t^ i r + r (l1.,,? f°- I d. + irr•.n 1707 ky . >;1 ' rd+ ?' }. ,'. ?,,. r` n } K•y.ri . ;. { t1.7r?f ' 05 ^f• .f ? ? 1 t jy i • • , e i y/? ?f' ( ?a,r 't' r{r y? }'yi:? l1 + '? 1 V F •.r ?r !!•.' t'1 Z r'{ Ii, t }7? r 'L t ?r+J :{ 411 "i ?, , !ti _' • ?'• • "•i"k 'I 7.11 ?' ).f S•yF L •-to iM1sltrl-+'k "j r.'{t???l ?F? ?i`5 '' i? Gr"!' l?Ii i.I ' S/)? !, 1 :,1,'I'i'NI rte,, :+{ ?it Q f70 .:?± Gs6 1701 Q'?^ nr-•t ?j` ..5. yt?r 4• ;wyi:y`,.f+ -y 9 sl'? :,1 1 'y r' 1r'j h, 1700 1•l'•'r.j+ ci';.•? r EO - - - - - - ?r}c, ?,Y,,? 'NZ ,f ?r •r nl, ?j W 171 "t itermain _L__M S. R. 590 1;})i }?•. 7??? R"'y*;1? '{:i' 7 Y- r'r I ?'1 •?••'' v5 fir' y; r Y>; i1 I?`•" t . •s ?;,r?' i r ? ? i C 4;• v t. 't..J.y- 1.: rtt:'Q !? i. ZI' {Jr d? '•i' tir ?i lL1 4.: ti 'if.<'. ,} M1? I%•711 33 X ?Z_ 1+Ir•f. /?y?'• ,:i. 147 q w S-t', i . r:'•i}; t [ r h ?. ?•f ?L F .••??!??rt}}`??+' ,? ? ?S+ r?,7i ?i F?? Jff?., •?+lq/•? ' ,Ya'?"rt ..t•? J,?,FK.F, ;4r;;5.e?,,rz,?j ''rt??U!ti?? {. r 1• :r'-, ?.? Y7?5:'Ti ,,:J1? \L?..r•?r'e5 r• 60 r7 e'V .? N " + .? ;" J. ? • L •?.,. ri 1 iti ? yt?Z µ.=+ f e'. VI. t? 'f?¢,?? x ?,' { /?f.rft?j. ','?;.,. W '?`?",-;.?5 j 1 j?. t r jar}, 'r?? ? . ,. ?, y tr.[ ,tif._? y.^.e??' N .5•?L A } . ?:.;'Y7;`!?>; I??..r?i ?{•'• 1.".`,,!'J '?.:a;:.? +?1C?'{^,% •;.!.???';-t }, T•W`.?;},1,.: ,?'' j?ul; ? Sf .. '?}% ; »??r ??yf til,){t`?: '` ,4 l,r?„+ {?/}?1{ ?K??I Fd I '?Ci ?.Ity.lj r}u .•.F.,;.l.c 1Y.. r? rr• '4?f`s'?'^:,,rT,'G's; .iii +w, `` ? r? ' f' ???ti'? /? .1.'.'I ti' 1/;T :'!'?tti w j. '?. f.7?f>:: ?i,'..}"'^ 1 ?•: .h';+aT;t 1 1 :1 Rya1t'! Sri.. ,r•. ti . h s[r '1}«.' ., '" t•t'r• _? ,l• • }, lit` 'r,• I 3 + ?"' 7 •.tf;,fa It f ?:: 6 1 •E. r ? + f 1?L? 1 )'I'1 _7 r ?[iIf'?• F•?.?: j ): i v,.+,..ti- r 1 ???i.: !r. r: + ? '• '.11? '?' Jn. r. sir` '?I..t r~.• r .; AfT AM'ti l?""'T. . 4 3'S;+ ?'l -x'4''.3( ''1;t??'?,? •?Y'r•'r •?: {{ )14ti/??l.,?fakl:" ? 7 ;. ;?,:£,? i?,? j j e?a?' .y .?^ty iw':i.. ??'n?t •4t 1 , a;f•l•yffLL'?,t14 •l.?i. *,?? '??:y` '• ;:4!'A',;• r ?'+ I?r .1•,•'r." {•,?y,4 bH 1'?•.., iT' ? t+' aC•:,:: 1?' ?•1ri?'^i \."?I._: 1fi.. 1 r ? jA ' y .?3;': 'S'.1z ~t :?1;1?^ {1.Z? .?? ,,tr?.+,' 'i.'t.+r" \'E'>,-.1' .1 •'•'i'sw?' 'u;'tYr-; 1?r•i _.._ ^ f:3'" 7 f h' 1 H 1 .1'.?. '}r s, w a [ ! +: I h•.5. i !t' 0 ,1. fiQJ• "?''..G; r } r:1CI U;,th",.? a 5 1.•r ?t .7 .? 'j.t:71 .? ?:!'••r+?? 1?rffr•a,?+s ' J f,ya,.•yv•? I?: :eZV'Z ?l :e.. ? ? t1ti,} •''t ,+:??t. !:!< rM ,i'3 ?. Fri RWi n '' 1, ='<tgr! ? r-?I 7; 'f t.,iil ' "?1'c[.?i-?^ •1,L, r SY.iy^!wrL?': 'r'.I'•'7? I.?cb r •w SFr . ,-t} I f '-;F'.? ?:. 5Y ?47:1?fi: :, ?1: Ity` "'?i-•:`?+, 4??, tt' N •1' ,-i}••ti ,!. ??? - ,3t , 'i•1 t '•?'h.r;?. tiil ::t a,J {''% W .?.. ._ ..d'., ,+i'^.'i lit!-?•r...?' .'l''. f+l'r ? : +1t;0?i} i.?t r :. ??,,+, 1 r•-a r•. :. +. !S(!ir f4115,t', r: X r}; !'' ,'SI :t'7?.1•;1:'1 .-•'4, 4ir 1. -f.? .• .r ;?:, ', r,1 ..5?, ..; ..u ._f, otd'k 'S ''ter ibi i' 'r; - r, f•',.i'' Q .ii; u:Y. ?I'A?;:''r t•'vi; t6: ji St: , k?w:. ?.., • 7,., -.,: 'd / I.• ,! 1'.t' , 7t'. !'?'? '"` 1?' ((?' J _j - •r'•7 ??11 ..? •, i•il }.hsw• F-.' ?S.r t' 7 rz0}??• I i•.C ??Y'?' ( .I.. '..!"1,171 ?', ''"!.i:t1 .':}tiJ.?f?•- •r• ,y?. 1 h:t.jlr:7i .•,t?,l ...!{., ;}r''ifrf..[?.l? atty.. .-3b;".l j,i. .'•',; :.'.?,ti ??.:; t7...?n ;?? j'?kUt4jt1' • ......«•r ii.l ,'? /? ?.t T '. I A , 1(il '^ fIrYi.. ,r 7 •. V l ...r_,'I r ''?,` =L'y, - •t ( -• [l'?'•. Ii •. 11R'dc r 'c`'' .'!?; 7 A' JS :.i..^1 `' ;t•••,: r. r? 1. ci,'`•f' 1;S r •1?.r f:.•r s a,{ <? ,• i .t`' 1 ?'Ci'0 r` crD1! Z - 'PJ? r5p1 ?t ;ir4: ti?^, •5?,f,, ,.'`'F'y .•.r",. :'.9{? ?Jl• ( Fy',l:] ,._-4r'.t1,J'I .Jl?,:i'„ :11',1`. -?.?: .? ?; ,f ?:f ,a.VC^' .1?.• •sr' Q s <.J p rV. ,rf 21 t. :!'• `1fCltf3 1717 ,(?'•'SJr1ii }C?' f61i ` U7 f? ,??•-5 ?? q:?.i • `';?7. 'i:.''.? .?r yFf ".U'... -?' - 'r}?/'??J.. [r?r, .tl.. ?1 j. ?7?' ?d": i .i. :??`•' - !7! 'I ?: ??.'?^ ',vl .,t ? .r,'..i. •,,?.• - ...??I .JEjt1: JJI:: ' ..i , ' y .,• rs1? •{? • '?`'i: 15S i f ly PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: L1i s E' . I - . . ADDRESS: -'1;-? :.I :' Ir<<i ;•.I f,' PROPERTY DESCRIPTI0N: ---- -- -- r 1, hi, .1 LAND USE PLAN ZONING FROM' :'' ±'.r}I I,; pHUf'ERTY ;'slit; IICRtAS; 0 .1-S T 0: .................- -- - HiOl-o!•'N,1y SI' n Acros' ATLAS PAGE: SEC, T'NP: RANGE. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: ; • CITY COMMISSION: 11rd f tt,ltic c N u. 6622-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6623-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST EL TRINIDAD DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET NORTH OF STATE ROAD 590, CONSISTING OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, VIRGINIA GROVE TERRACE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1706 EAST EL TRINIDAD DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL LOW; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Proaerty Land Use Category Lot 3, Block 2, Virginia Grove Terrace, recorded in Plat Residential Low Book 37; Page 29, Public Records of Pinellas County, FL (ANX 00-09-17) Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6622-00, and subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Z2 Leslie K. Dougall-Sidds Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6623.00 ?,. '•,: .? 674 fa?7$ +': i?;17aF1 a¢ .a; 5794•-134 •1.71 #: -!, .':•f'l -t•»::=::- r}ti '3.•,.•?"7,f ., ....? :• •,.•?; `?''?•??2.'•? ;;.`?, 5719•+-13r??• •? ;:'? e _ 684kj5F??;?; r?'? 'rt: Vii. j4' ir45. - Siry? .'•' l isw „.Z :. ... rw! :t..• ..w'17'?/,.5.'f?fl .?c;•t? •s1fid;;124Z.?' :'M579<?f?? ;.;•.:...'r,•;..:?,'843 -?3Sj?':`•:? ' •'••1;5•y r' •+Y?ft- ?`,yr•+1 y. i:. .r,"'? .:•.r.il?':?Q' y,r+? r't?"?,•,'ir?.f '-?'.?; .,.•5• ''S•`r,?• 3t} •1r..[, ' a w f, (.. ." .,. ;6353 4G`r ?'•% :?1? J {i , ,`f y.[r•y.? ,I?.•R'.,1 ,.? ,?'.7/., . X1}•1/JL' `i .. , •. 1 w. YID: r''?'Lr•'•' A t•t: ? K, µLV' .?I r •? y t r L. .( y,. ?. •„ •'• V 2:- .(^r.•,n:i r,' ti? ..:1::.=. ;?:.,.. ,?7? ..3.;'• f7?3• A`'S7t?-irui 1? r+- J:?3?? .ri9,: •'?. f . 1•?a' L13 ,;i• , r7> n 1we I751Y. 175 17.:.1 } ?4?'?5? t 17 2 ' 1 ZC ?.I 11 Z L? ;'•" %" ' "-' ?: ! 111 10 " < 17. 1 148 17, - 1715 -_ 1738 ' - =Z • fr1, 7 S14N0 ? +L111 Y 1740 ? `'' z 1 yRo ' rrra ,. rte:. , $S? }1;1= ?157?t?1?G8 ri. .r 610'4-73;',.' ;, ;. •. h.lwl ?` i 11iC3?> Z'4,:.} . •>17211 rte' " 1729 f?,: i1T?g •'a'i: :7731 r:. 'r.u 6953ry-712.'w'• 12r' ..:?: tlttT•t-739'A 'w '.1:''' 1+ ;:4`I;, 717273 .y :?.. •?Z:w``?',.r•.7+' :?-? •.ii,.} :?' :° .:l%:',a'..: .I.?'I',?/.L?r:.:?^ 4095-??•1f1:.^ '???•?7` ?•.?.?•i.'. ?• :r f7zSr.`'r.'', cy 'w5f0$-.4?7 {.4.'' 72i ?72i ,? ,r 7 glCa':7t? _ 2 . ": r22f.?.•.t' - ,...r-x.,. £.... >'7ar .. .. ?r%.r.,i.y:.. - ... .,- . . 170130 irterma .t;,3 rr•Q..4 12'73;• :.•4=? ?`- ?T? '' '^[r ' ?•+'4? 3?ff4'irt+•jY • l 'ls `:, 7 ry ',.. qJ.•""" i.? "3A.i?r -?u{t :• 1704 =}f' ?i• :r.bp.? e? :t,i.; j. •R+.•, 17[JrJ ?j'L3=' .1- 3 ? 1?r735 J ? t ? L 1734 I j `31t n + 730' 1 724 i 17}0 S7 v 5 »2z zf) ", to 109 :-i L-r''•':T718' LSST JOHN a' (? •1t•`: iz1.1, f711 ??;?5'•'•';ry %i ? f`.'•'t; f;c?•? 2 C ,l?'- 7'.Lq t+r V 1 •- _ V. •, i+ ,5 ztaNN?'r.7LD;?t ? ''+ .A?- ??y s??S11?'e 9 ?: "?',?'tl??t4i'•{ ,r SerSV ::'(: NW{ ?f.t'r?' h troj 1 60 S. R. 590 t 1„' ? L? 7 :i1 lryf, y,,.t 3' I rtY p..•..? ...N i s' Iira 11 r k'T a ?,( ? (_".,,i y , '° „r,.. ,,. . 'Tr Yy'. rt, 'r+e elf'?. .,r,?%-?' 7i. ?`.a r? f. ?3 • t,:..'.i(:, 4. i'Y.r.:. Y' +8?a?a 1 '"''g.Y`?• •Y,•' ? •? -{.C rt•:Y" 1 {. r k . ,:i n 'r q•:{ 1u;.? I,i ? '•'t,'r+Nk i'",,.rl..x•L• "l r'4' A?,?... ! 1? nti, 1;? ? ti''1+• ?iY'r7 :n??;a?,:?r. ?? .,? ' '??.J,1 t., y-,"s, t' S', e+ •n.. c,.?.?,,. ti,..??r c?j?:1.f..?.1 ,,,.Cl?ari , r.3r••{ 4y7s:~y ;?+$-.? ?,?,r ? "zt,.j'tii??; c1 ? 3?..• }}.L, J 03 li •?L t N .y ?v If' `•Y1z',ia S'? :.,` 'r N,'ti nllCf s'' l'.=" 3:?? i t .i1?'p .. A •45 l?_-1 ,. u ' ,•,?"! ?S r V. •'? : ti •?"` • ' ia_ r" .,,. tins'} r f•rMl .,v.•%rfyl!••u.. ,r?S iL* •,.7.?.A.: ,:1.1?.'?r Jul 1.?'++vl I? ' ?;.r • /??!t •'??\t,?,1? 's•?' Cr' yY, ?3'IL '1',F 1 }• i .1?, ' ?n _ Y.. ?4 :.... ?Sr` ? .,Tf?t ?? ,yY,?.f'.r. (?tTr`'r' ??1, ? s,}r t+ .?.?i ?5t r irzilsa li' 'ri::. 1! y'z`? j? ?`L *? , '";:-:117 ?? ::?t?1+? "r :1 ;r.,,, !z? • f?? .?1C1??•r' 1GJ1 ..i?; •7j -?•n.?v :.1.4::•?.?.1?Ix ..1'? ?+:t, '?'.?"NS?Y• '>r?''.rir.• •'i?. Sr??'? ??e,. Sitl 1t']' sa?n? ,'•?+?ye}'Z? ?,.e` •,...,' .?' •:Ita qty ? }t 'I•ili• ;,:°•°-;r. '_ y. ., ?,. •, 'per ^l ;'•v `Cyv+,r,:'"r•+N?•.` .fr ?'o: ?•?i?,(rf..Yt' ?+•1 15,31 i :t t, .I?;? ? `?f ..?' •,rr1 N. ?.s z '`.? ,w,? ?.?,y t; : 1:-.?h'I. Y•. 3.`f [' ,i .?4?4•tiq•!vl ?ti.?, ,. ,. k., i '_.,+'•y`,' ?. t '!. , } r, y? -rt ?. ;{•? ! • Y,w "`irV .r ,'4?1%, 1 }rY{?r - y?1 , }, •.5 .. r r'' ;7;' .y? 'j ? , ,? .I.}1•?:`; !'' t 4 iI, 3:•.1,' t,., R, i ,t• 7 v.. 1_' n 7Q? ?1' ?:{(f1DB 9-., ,. .t.:.• w lY i:U ?*;fYl .s • ,?` 6?.n ?1+.!• ?,•, S a,'r r?l? :a: ?ti; .j?3.:r.•_' 'y. `,?i'.>'?Q k. :7?Q'Jt. ,r,s.1. 5 [: 1 ?•?'•< r aa a..:^ •e?: 5.•..,. ? r :^?,zj' .,?:;: 'E7' n7a ??}' aa. •.?I a ,.4 •,:, Rf z.t ?'•1t t,. r•?''i?,` 'r'u, y . iy i f.? 'Y''' , .t e : r 1 1? Ai' , r':" ?? ?' ;j ('o + Vt 1 ?,'t.•r.-?`; ` ,f ? 1.r: ??F•r .??:,:. cY?,, r7,; e # a'1 a.?v,?i,'? aE 3?.$:,?: s;.? .-, j,, -_ ?•.?. y?.S C a,.Y'?••y', l6?1 ' 5• ` i. •a . ral f. : rr : r` ,,,- x_t5 -w , .?t,???`-. L. . ; '??.. .,?'] nr,.+src. !•, *•'rx::1 s 4'i•. ]:..1•t • •?r?"1,SP ?i'k??'".?,L Ft??r :1 ,.ifr ? '!•' ?f.?.T::• ..: e. sTt.? •i5'•,' 4J !1 !+:.?i r. 't4 _. ne. r'SV .n. N ,?•'. ?':'':1•r,. a1r:1?:;1Ni LF' z...• ? w' i?-_+ ?? ? ,?- :i.s?'r11ti%.?•1f?;,.f,.: t.....'•:- •' ''1?Qra?r,,;?:, 'r6Qi1 >;=['}'iCQ57?•r!(,{?• =t Fi J _ " ••.ti ':I. i.'r =? r 1.?,` c,'?"..?:, .;? ?.iYlkr ;i ter. -'?., •• ( Q - ?'I -..l ?. ,f. ri.? 'i ,i. -r !'I p,;n ti r•^{r. '1•'-'151•r,r: ?.Y ?.. T Js; r?? •S.j'?' •l•v''").. •` ?r -` E .{ t ,? rs.,?' ,*c.y`?,, ?•" 4 ti r; v.! . 1 s.• T:•i !••'!? !'"'H ' ?".'= ,u J.Ir.!.?.• ;S?t ?I 1$1 _ ti1 ,._.. `?'; K QftlU?, t Y (ar.- '• ?.( 1??. c ..?. .. , __ , :I? ?:3h^ w ,l: 4 :l.k ,'. l.?T . L,:R 1 1 ? f•?L 3..•'L'.:'.'•!'. ,1 •'r O'? ! ?.r ? 1' :? r?.. .r-..?.u •:` .:.:i:'•7•.. ?. L iy. i .. ...+LS.. z4::rf?160 _.?: t?{S?i,.;:i i •ai;•k ?" ?GOr,iy:y?ry'nr. ? .L-i y ,. i.At• .'w? 07. ?7 V e k. ?y' :h '?' :"s•,.• r?li" ;'C 7,1,. ?f,•?.•+..5-,2 appp? if?'g,i.:.:. . L;. `-,,; ZJ? rtiV 5?, :•}. :!4' ,. :11. a.... , (,, :, Lif+ _ r :;.nh :. 7 ..NJ• .,•,%'. ;?i4 .'1i,•hll {, V .?^I .1` _(.,., ,L +. 1" l w?'.?Y_?•: .4.: '.,s1li0p.5 .N ?--: 1 1601 r . 'y ?.,.I A.• ?":r ..1h1? ,°k : '1' t•- • t?• "?, f_. tv '"i. ttti•• yjJ" n i?r''? 'Q."'> . tii_ V.J SY! , 1,1 •• .,?{ 1t! 5 ..i 4 N w :,1.1. N : N' > l "$f?ft3 `• 1311+ t.} y, E k ,?5. :.i x 4 ?' y,V 1't - +;•j: :If?1F.' 1 1` i' I? 1 1 111 I PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: -')c 1 Case: ADDRESS: -C"', PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: y 17 LAND USE PLAN ZONING _ _ _--- ??- FROM: ,.1 7 0.18 i PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: TQ r ------- ` _ __ ... - -- -- -- '- t-at•'Nay 5i4? ACrns: Rlgh -- ATLAS PACE: SEC: T'NP: RA IGE. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: CITY COMMISSION: Ord1mince N o. 6623-'00 ORDINANCE NO. 6624-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST 'EL TRINIDAD DRIVE, . APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET NORTH OF STATE ROAD 590, CONSISTING OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, VIRGINIA GROVE TERRACE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1708 EAST EL TRINIDAD DRIVE, ' UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance Is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan, now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1, The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zonbd as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Pro a Zoning District Lot 3, Block 2, Virginia Grove Terrace as recorded Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) In Plat Book 37, Page 29, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (ANX 00-09-17) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. . Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6622-00, PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: I re t 1 1L1 ( } Leslie K. Dougall-Sided Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 6624-00 h.. .t ?.. fr, • 17•(9 h ?, ,?k? •f.5 . 1 5J- :i ' ? r •'y; 11?t,y6!'.A ?s' ??`1' •' i _1785 •.- ? IiSB rrii? 9 ..' xa?=i3ta . ??: I ,.. . f R• I. 57i?4-t{if 'f't cp '..' t, : i;., ?. _' ;fi ?" t7M fi 8? x 14 My t.34?i'a' •A• W.;• 'J75J! ;y f','S f ' ?' f' 13 Y. 4 ,1 _ t 1711$. i'?I:• I r':. 17•nss? _ r }_ r r. S,:,:1T1G L:. tn;:,•j, ?: %-sa 9 ,t ?..ir ;.r ( '4?.'}j-'t ?(1`• l?•tF •.. ?,: .' ?.. ', . ??T?-})? .l 'f'?fiQ• ?7 ?r :1ria' leas fi " 17.17 1757 ?0. } ! .,... ",. '•.? ;l 1755 175•1 } '•7 .4 ,'';.v{ 7J1'? .) ?,; „ i'- ;.i: .: t ;'j::175A. ` _ ?' r+i: `. X15 it7, 573+{35t w :':.1744 ; ,r' ;?.t= (; ?'??'"q/?6?I I 0 i = -1 I 1 o f' !. . w,.' <`i ' w':'???$••!?D i??•tr?jt ?STCa ;11?T w' :Xf*?'?Q.ti.y?o 1'!* .': '! ';?;,•:' 'x'86r3???C?? rk.w''',r ,? .. '1..... k"' r-W ?3 ri ?! h '^:. ' A ' r''J,.!. 'r?;'.s, ?j i : i .. 1 i,,:.;r • ,i • ' '' j?,, y r? "'J.?:. J r1.1.:,.T; Ur Y ti. ..v'' i' r'(?'4.1.y:4 s,"j. r" .i •i..;t°.5s?• :.r:'.?. ».?,...; -,t V?r:, rl ^ I J 'Z JT,f ,Js'f h'' %•r-17II+ ,•?]- 1F.:1?; ,?,:Y ?'a :...,:::::• {. .7 r} ?-.•1 , .. ., ':_?Q ;; •".l. 1718 ¢ - f?aT.`::s• :''1 ?' d5ri J. 7 1148 17- ty;? t*; : f r r{ -V,c ,.`,6r0-40- C`,n ''17J>i [~ .••sls of .Z ?`.:'S • t4: ea'? r,? '•' ''r' r:'4`'~ t' ?':'. ,,. 1'r y: ''• :f..r•r; T2 I Sriski'Y-17' 4 x, ', r ti, 'Y• is 1 s," - K`'r ' :. "?-.rr--- ti,?,•,:?:?.. .17 ?.?1 ..; .. • !73•J•.: .. cTr& 11at ',??:,.': !T.?a '?2::': l7?.Z `' ' "' t' 737 - 2378:i ti}!'?:ia? r;i1 {}1:?: 1•i57i,%t OU , 6104-7;4 1 /•?1 ;,, yet „,.: ,..? ,-• p r-y? r w?• `-'`?''- 'ii•?'ti 1rJ''ri:' ;?.J$!i•'.'.? •: ?.; "'.•'., ':?•? .. A, 81,... ,. :? L; PY C.i'?p. ?l :L?.tik ;tf72ix !.f C1:, 2 f?:1rtt.•1• \dtt.yi2$ 17.15 y :r i ?yy., Ir; '• `; 699:71?'?' ?yt'17245lti -7?7,L •."!,'.Y•;. :;a'.f7z?" ,f J ;.§?^ ci' : F~} .;' ' ^`'} jr'` i.i?,:2i1' i ..'"':':'= : i:,:i ;y.,??• ; •' 994jro2?i0''; .'_}: 7? t,r%:!'f= ' i? = ' k''•' „? z •! 13Q 1 1 3 172S:Lt'r,,.:?.? Fw 505-287 ':: y::5. }92 ! } i•J? 70,'.: J. y 5 yZ 2 ?r ',? % - :mot;: •?•a: •:i=-.. 4 C0,.91F,.? ??:••. .,..lti, 'r '.f5 ?.•,• 3' t 1 2 5.'. r v •, _ rii.•':: iw-?. •S •...-,c;..:•• 17.75 t'!Z , V, V1. ;'rQ '`,,;^.Yi ..: iJ !"' r? ti? ..f.. '?y:;?:;•4i t.:?{° t' ,' ,s t.%+ ny';:, 'v f ?- r?.w Ai .•'} •t Q &` ,rp'. r. ' ,1: 4?, ?Q E} ?r7 +?-• s? i C _ :u'i72 ?r'i •iCtii-ti?T. k:'_ ;.? 5670' 14:iTA1' "la'a.??.•i?• i••tl 726 i;' Sew M. ¢• ??fi•. 7.. ? U t'- ri' t ?'4 OQ?514 te?r;s1Y 71@' tr'... " y. i:;r,•?t 4.137 q 6,: 1 766, • rQ+ t;( I': •t?, 1 'r • "Y"; i'^ ? F'';;"s •r•Y•, Y?pwl? 1'-d3:, ....`?, k•,; 'FI"}?r,+ •:+-;rte, ?.f my k-- 3 }. :;°:. '? ..'•?; , ,. Al „ • .?.:,:,. ?? s"' ?, • ' ,:rT ?r•a ?,ll:.k,. !?? ?, l.7fT_':r:.,frt: :}'?• -r-r,•:s.:.i' 117,;'.<•':-?•. •1- '• ? '' w ? ppy{ Y i "?:1 r 1t Q?:`? !t+'?4cr_t? i .. 1Q4"•7 A: 'g t 684 t- r'' A r.: 4 r 4]'? rft: c nr 5„ ? !;' .t:. ;r ,t\!: t{•, ?, tip - [iJ .! .fit v ?. ?.. k.'; ? ?'' ,a?' ' ?.7ra'7r1'lii 4? h r•..• ry .?ti; ?1 .?e,;'x^?S ?'? ? ? L•l,i:''^. y,,. 17'?.:..?t' ..r"?S= iY`1-' '?:?';?. ,,?• is. ? C7,Q!f?. lrti ??'T?fb• ;; ' =°..? rt?'+ ' ?7. ;?C}i •' }F7i5.: "?' . ''F :??. •.? ;. Q-.: 1?i3'rT.•.. _ a:[L.t 7r73Y? a . rr ; „ •• 'r..,.,,. tl. -' 'y'czs;' -:, ?'••v'r' ,f.;'1`..?.1.': - w5T JOHfV ?r IF. (•' ? , ' , ?' };t. •.?'1 << ? r , ,Fi ,.' (,2 (:!i: I]'?'' r • ?, >t t,' .rMJ ('ii/'•' 1 dr't;k .'t;• `ll, ;L- r;'?+?",,?rJ? '?C?3?i :a:'.`52??? ":;:n??;=?- Fj ....r$.?s? E???? 4?•4 ,?,7r•7?t ..? •k z J ., ? .'r t rr ?,}r =`? 7'•tr t. r.;! t:s S ?; -. ? V[' = 3 ,Y7? -a f 1711 r! ' '' `iY ¦ • r 10'.lt.?+?.' f:J'•1,`r•s: _ kW ti 7: r r •f.ry?.,, . .i .k f • 11r :rt;..? Ci• t •?'V•'4•'1 l'.:ri•pay..? '< <•''?"- •? ,! q , ia •`.r•• tiN S,?';;. ;{ i.a i .n ;:.,..;,s... ;,',1?,?, v 7 -•t'. 'Wits ? ? lQ ? t? .? i?.. 3 3i '3S ,w k. ') ? t... •,1? .x;: ' r•:: '%` r nat' ?* ]Y. ? ?4• t 7 bra N".4, L;t} 2 sc?/? gr?,i?y.;rtT?cf<;7Olla •:i.1?? t ?4..?. Y3? t$ i ?+ rtl.?F5 , }i _ F T>. tD:.`•, Q i !7R ftN 170 (1ji?q?n ?: s•-,. F`fT t c f,. +..,.,. .•, •r e}ti? q 'j,:.r 1701 rt I •.., v' r CLEARWA TEF. .. ,?;,Y ,r' L .Fik.at::1"fir rr ® .`lcr1 e.:y-yn: •• ?'! dy \?`''i•"4 t-,t 'S,, .Y t, t t3 1 3. k-4 F•? ,. ,rr ,11r' Y;c..'.r 1 ,.•?rs,•. ,ttif' ?I ,,77?,.1y?•'' '!}? i 1 r L'} ;f Nr""Cir'rrr^h•fii':,?t' : tlr,t r ..C '1 ??`v.;{Y?'ri i 'SNP 13 ,•' ?Y !1 -f ,y .. .li 4 Its I•"ff/ 1 ,{y'(1 TTII r'?• 'i } ' ' ) 1 • 5 ?. h r !" : ?.,., 1. •f • r, hI{ •7 III. •f ! t' *1 S f E ' ti \J ,Z•'t's ?. ,Y itir +K-14r r.., $r "+t k' *a .tf?a]. r•.,Jktx., °f r`J 170J "'?: `,• .K?''h? L.S? .F t,?+K r^ao i._. r yv w, : r tPrmain IVV 0 o S. R. 500 'o --, .y. f;;?; ,C `rr :••; y ?;J?,• _ ' {lryi i;ry- ?, _ .? ?t.ya ,:....?s •.?_-••,a;s.i._ {, N,u .,? ,?Q;L , vl, ?:•r+.x ;,t ti ti?.-t ?i „••rs}l:+?fW. - S 60 „ .. ?1{, % ? •:? ! 4t 13Qr' 7: ?•' ••r^ al ?'i a+'l f, ?. .!• 1t. I?f* ?? l'N • ,??sf?t ;{ly.?, sYi. ? ? ?ww,. r_..•.,? rb?W 12• ,e??In:• i=??? ? li,??# r ?'L"if?.C'? „?r ?? p f? ? 4 a{?',u r. T ? ,'li. „s { }?' • , ,, ? ? ; -•r,,; Gnn.fi ,?.i.:+r. • ,* •s:C ?.? r ??,:. "J ?", it. ,?tT /•? ?'?• y sc;1i A' `??'r i sJ..C., .} !1`1: y HI ?Vr 1 Qj y'. N •C s i S . tL?? t = 3', i ? ,.w> ^: W Sti a S,, t) , ? e . _ t^ +, ?7. t Lti+%;' f r - , itr+ J (y E i1. [ '•' +' 1 r 'li ??. •' w ?`. ti,.L:• ; I• ; { ,.? S7. V ?y+ ti„ a F..4 :.* t•! y:[• :s ?7.,y 'yl :Ir.i +, .•?4? ;.. 7F,,fn 0 'l%''7?L• uy,?uj lr' r• :`'1•?ir....• `?.t? ti? L, ?t'ic, {' :.?, r`L F[r? Wivo * 4`t. t_„ kl.. ?, :'?'?, `1?1Q3t'r'",•.+J.;?, J ?' :Yit• ??.. R¢.r ,t, '; . `+.,,wJ ? ? ?JIr ;.I" 1?, 4 y 13.r r .:.1.Ry ?R] :?cl a ti 3 L3 i-?•:4., ''?icyry;`1-+'?tt• 'J ?l? 1? Y ti s; r .c: 1C..J r lt. r Aw 1 ,,n V1 +? rt N. •, ?, ?'- ? _ .. ?.,. d.?-. s: ? L,y. ..;:..: ;,.;..µ Y!: fy n ?,•, •. ? i; t ?I , ? tr 'i!..t,: '.7Y.. RTtti ,dp?';c:y. W ?,?,.,y..?" ?y'•.' C•: +.. 'i, J. 1_?'" r - _ 2 t -A-. e i?'?'t"i ? t' ? ?i ?;' ?.•\I! ;, .5? K' '•:: CJ ':,tip ?'f'?1 .Y :^'? i=•,Mr•N? ?.:: S t L-' y t ::•-r '?'.i t ti!' + J i ? v :i1:-^r.:Y.^rda?.,l•}+.. itr. "1pO'$;. c!'.. ''ti4..;160i7 •. ?, :x?UL,Y ri•. Et ? Yt:t,,,: .'rte aw ??1.'=,t '.-7•t •-! '..r ; S :•-rA:"{`rrir • t ^':r. .. sir Z`fj rir.+r f'f??.'-'L '•` "?• ' .{ ' r"' C? A•?• .-1- ?, ?krr• 3u t?,• +?4rLt?:..y. t? Z.?..'?Gi: "L•:-ter: "+'JJ,, !•rt:1, ?rw:i; t•1:?75 1}'!3i '.'ri-S`. -+ 1%'•;: ?r'; S?.S 7 "?r t?:..? F,'(,Qf! J JBJ •7 f?r-tl •7 S r 7'a?•y ?ttl]k?iVE.'" tuT• 'i?p?SfStii,ik _?. r, , .. '!•';r•-'5...,:'?.-?'Y .4 ., i'ti?._s , >iFn?elayr' t- ?y t h?. s •.•.:• .I:;; 7?7 J; F :rJ:(z? }?r' .1ool" (y.i f : ?r F_-, }lj? f ry+? (a ?r Ifl' ?? •.Af, `,F. p7. •r, {,rn. 'fir: y-wS• ?. ?' '} S:?i .J.Srtisi? ,r•`?,'w, •'r.Y •?_ ' =•r:.YFz' 'Vlrl.Y!./?.' ??-+-' ±•,.:?1•'t•'.'r a.',/i ??-? `.,=?i:,??k%. .;4 •i?h' :,:' t :rF•kr..?:y z%.i.• NY. .? ^r„ .?:?:::;iy.. 1 j.• try: :ii ,:x,j•. of] .? ?1' ,! . 1 ti Tt"•l r.:.vx. +4 ter..' •?` 't1.'•': I': •;# ' .' t-.1 °r.l: +r::t.. 'sir L.1 'i" .r, n• •:t, R , l • , wn.. c < G'• •,r%4.'..:.t :pL ! r.. • I Q` 160 1 ^' r..Yi.!:Y;:i,. F?t. :N :':t.:,.N: N :2_'.`' .521 s• .' ISItl5t7- J51G •C]'. 14511::•1 ;..'..c.+ ' t 4. V) .f k ',i.4'..; r'S;4?r,t•i ;?rr11,? :r.;,. .,V•.'., ';I C,• • I •,$ •:,t.. ,.¢.I .a. •r_. ry?-µt:r?'„L,'•?" :+f`1 '2Ft? =Z?'.. ,-'Cj-'`•'?r., „I.,:- % 3 a PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: fl` tfl1e 7hcc er case:? i?IX P;- -9- i z ADDRESS: 11if',d Cr ? !?ROPE_RTY _D_E•SCRIP_TION --- - - - - LAND USE PLAIN ZONING FROM: PROPERTY SIZE ACRES-Y__ _ 0.18 - T 0: Right-of-'Nay Size Acrus: ATLAS PAGE: • SEC: T%VP. RAMGE: - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD; r••• 1" CITY COWMISSION: ordinance Flo. 6624-00 CDB Meeting Date October 17, 2000 Case No. ANX 00-09-17 Agenda Item: C. 8. CITY' OF CLEARWATER 'PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER(S): Christine L. Thacker & Jack L. Thacker APPLICANT: City of Clearwater (Pursuant to Agreement to Annex dated November 13, 1984) LOCATION: 1708E Trinidad Drive, on the west side of Trinidad Drive, approximately 230 feet north of State Road 590. REQUEST: To annex the property into the City of Clearwater in accordance with the provisions of approved Agreement to Annex and approve the appropriate City land use plan, category and zoning district. SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 8,050 square feet or 0. 18 acres Dimensions of property: Lot width of 70 feet by 115 feet deep PROPERTY USE Current Use: Single Family Residential Proposed Use: Single Family Residential PLAN CATEGORY Current County Plan Category: Residential Low Proposed City Plan Category: Residential Low ZONING DISTRICT Current County Zoning District: Residential, Single Family District (R-3)/County Proposed City Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) BACKGROUND INFORMATION : On November 13, 1984, the previous owner of this property entered into an Agreement to Annex (ATA) the subject property with the City of Clearwater in order to connect to CDB 'ANX 00-09-17 October 17, 2000 Page 2 the City sewer and water facilities. At that time, the subject property was located outside the municipal boundaries ofthe City of Clearwater and did not meet the adjacency requirements for a voluntary annexation. The terms and provisions of that agreement are binding upon the previous owners, their successors, assigns, or any subsequent owner of this property. It was agreed that at such time as it would become possible for the City to annex the property, that the ATA would constitute an application to annex at that time. The subject property is now contiguous to the existing city boundaries to the south of this property. The City was also required to give the property owner 60 days written notice of its intent to annex this property. This requirement has been met and a notice letter was sent to the current property owner on June 28, 2000. The notice expired on August 29, 2000. Moreover, the agreement provided that the owner of the property at the time it was to be officially annexed, will pay the City of Clearwater a one time payment of two hundred dollars ($200,00). The fee is the property's fair share of its impact on open space and the funds are earmarked for the maintenance of an acceptable level of open space required to promote the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Clearwater. The open space fee is based on the City's Recreation and Open Space impact fee ordinance originally adopted on July 7, 1983. The current owners of the property are Christine L. Thacker and lack L. Thacker. ANALYSIS The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request in order to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and conditions established in the ATA agreement of November 13, 1984. The subject property is now contiguous with the existing City boundaries and it is consistent with the Florida statutes with regard to the requirements for voluntary annexation. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Low and it is proposed to be zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). The subject property is a single family residential home. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES Water and Sewer The City of Clearwater has been providing water and sewer services to the subject property since November 13, 1984, and capacity for the project continues to be available for both utilities. Therefore, this annexation will not have any eirect on public facilities. In addition, the City's ability to serve the overall site had previously been documented through the previous ATA annexation agreement. Moreover, the previous owner had I' CDB ANX 00-09-17 October 17, 2000 Page 3 paid the required sanitary sewer impact and assessment fees applicable at that time. Solid Waste Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's Resource Recovery Plant and capacity is available to serve the property. Police: The property is located within the East Police District and service will be administered through the District 3 Station located at 2851 McMullen Booth Road. Community policing service will be provided through the City's zone system and officers in the held. The Police Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect police service and response time. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to the property by Station ##49 located at 520 Sky Harbor Drive south of Clearwater Mall. The Fire Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time. In summary, the proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public facilities and their level of service. 11. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Flan designates the site as Residential Low whose intent is to recognize areas where use and development characteristics are low density residential in nature. Residential uses are the primary uses in this plan category up to a maximum of 5 dwelling units per acre. Other permissible uses in the Residential Low plan category include Public/Semi-Pubic uses, schools, ancillary non-residential and Recreation/ Open Space: uses. The annexation does not propose to change the Residential Low plan category and the proposed use is consistent with the uses and density of this plan category. Moreover, the annexation promotes infill development as stated in Objective 2.4 of the Future Land Use Plan: 2.4 Objective - In considering extension of service and facilities, Clearwater shall actively encourage infill development, CDB ANX 00-09-17 October 17, 2000 Page 4 In summary, the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan both in the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies of the Plan. III. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS The zoning districts appropriate for this site under the new Community Development Code are the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District. The dimensional requirements of the LMDR district are consistent with the surrounding development on this site. The application for annexation involves an existing residential detached home. Under the current LMUR zoning district requirements, a minimum lot width of 50 feet and 5,000 square feet lot size are required.. The lot width for the subject property is 71 feet and the lot size is 8,050 square feet which exceeds the minimum lot size and lot width required for the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district. Therefore, the site meets the dimensional requirements of the LMDR district as a standard development. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN There is no change requested in the Comprehensive Plan category of the site that will remain Residential Low with a maximum density of 5 units per acre. According to Special Act 88-464 which established the Pinellas Planning Council, annexations of less than 10 acres do not require the review of the Council nor of the Countywide Planning Authority. The subject property is less than an acre, therefore, due to the small size of this property, review by the Pinellas Planning Council is not required. There are no other Countywide Plan policies applicable to this application. V. CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA LAW Florida Statutes require that a proposed annexation be both contiguous with the existing municipal boundaries and compact in its concentration (Florida Statutes Chapter 171 ). This property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the south of the property and represents a logical extension of,the existing boundaries. The compact standard of Florida law requires that the annexation does not create an enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries. The annexation of this property is consistent with this standard and no new enclave will be created by annexation of this property. In summary, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law. CDB ANX 00-09-17 October 17, 2000 Page S Vt. ' CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS The response from the Community Response Team (CRT) indicates that the property is partially overgrown with grass and inoperative vehicle is also located at the site, The Community Response Team will work with the property owner to bring the property into compliance with the City Community Development Code following the annexation. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request in order to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and conditions established in the ATA agreement of November 13, 1984. The City has been providing water and sewer services to the subject property since November 13, 1984, and capacity continues to be available for both utilities. Therefore the proposed annexation of this property will not affect the provision of public facilities. The proposed annexation and the existing use are consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. The existing and future use of this site as a single family home is consistent with the LMDR zoning district. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. The payment of $200.00 is due to the City on November 1, 2000 prior to the adoption of the associated ordinances on December 7, 2000. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the request: 1. Recommend APPROVAL of the annexation ofthe property located at 1708 E. EL Trinidad Drive, 2. Recommend APPROVAL of the Residential Low plan category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Recommend APPROVAL of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. Prepared by : Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner ?? ? ? 1 { r1ll1lF;'!'R-'?„4j°f.?SS?Q`1.1.'t????R.j ?Al?:l•Mi'§ ? i IS. '•ti .•1? S.(F (YI?f ?S?SJ?t F 1./ 1?'. t?i.....?L ?,"i '; ^? G?- 1i -?'°' ? ' ?• }' ? ? ' ?# ei?` '? ' : ? ? '' [ ' : ? ?r ? • ? ' .1 • ? ' , ', , ? , , ? t 1 ? i ! G' •J?5. . F +.'1e ..r Ali' .rw:.tM}.x??P- ,.;•_p. ? :u-il? 1. I_ .i 1 tr • ' 1, ' ? , S CDB, ANX 00-09-17. , , October 17, 2000 Page 6 Attachments Application , Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity. , , I:and-Use Map. 1 Zoning Atlas ' , Utilities Maps ; i Location Map Chr?s6w L Thacker & Jack L Thacker NORTH 1708L: El TrfnidadDdve 1"=1320' "X OD-09--17 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY 3 Q ? -7 f 8 - ?mle. u a Cl 0 PROJEC'T' SITE a LAKE ??« cw 0 d sr D QLAR R $A IF HA RUtn Ceserd Nd, Gr ACD? e ? l1 KOVC DR 7? i ICS U• Lo. SAN u q SAN j "z I ITS 3 r.rm+a An? +rI1/rr ???+54"?* CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA '_7 3 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION rEq ? `d? ENGINEERING o ;a U 6l? 51 S 0 q Clearwater City Cbminissioll Agenda Giver Ntmoranduun SLI BMT/FdMM M EN DATI ON: Worksession Item X Final Agenda Item # 13 Meeting Date: November 16,00 • Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendments for 1880 McMullen Booth Road; Owner: RIC Properties Limited. MOTION: APPROVE the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment from County Residential Suburban to City Residential Suburban and Zoning Atlas Amendment from County Zoning District Rural Residential (R-R) District to City Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning District for 1880 McMullen Booth Road (Metes and Bounds 32-04 in Section 04, Township 29 South, Range 16 East) and PASS Ordinances No. 6625-00, 6626-00 & 6627-00 on first reading. (CC ANX 00-09-18) 17 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SU M M ARY: This site is located at 1880 McMullen Booth Road, on the west side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 300 feet south of Sunset Point Road. The purpose of the annexation is to allow the City of Clearwater to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the October 10, 1980 Agreement to Annex (ATA) between the City and previous owners. The current use at the subject site is a day care center which is a non-conforming use and inconsistent with the LDR zoning district. However, since the site was legally established for use as a day care center since September 19, 1980 under Pinellas County zoning regulations, and the use has not changed since then, the existing use at this site is regarded as legally non-conforming and will be grand-fathered in as such. The subject property is the LaPetite Learning Center/Academy and the site is approximately 0.89 acres in size. The property is now served by the City of Clearwater water and sanitary sewer service pursuant to the agreement to annex. The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: • The proposed annexation will not have an adverse impact on public facilities and their level of service. • The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide Plan and the Community Development Code. • The proposed annexation is contiguous to existing municipal boundaries, represents a logical extension of the boundaries and does not create an enclave. Reviewed by. ' Originating Dept: Costs F Info Svc NIA Legal PLANNING QUART Total (ETIM 5 UDOH) Budget NIA Public NIA User I We Funding Source: Works Purchasing NIA DCIv1/ACM Current C1 FY Risk Mgmt NIA Other Attachments OP ORDINANCES NO. 6625-00, Other 6626-00 & 6627-00 STAFF REPORT Submitted fly: City Manager 13 None Appropriation Code: Printed on receded oaaer rtev. 2198 Since the proposed annexation site is less than ten acres, the annexation will not require the review of the Pinellas .Planning Council. The Planning Department determined that the proposed land use plan amendment and-rezoning applications are consistent with the following standards specil'<ed in the Community Development Code` • . The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning application are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan o The potential range of uses-and the specific proposed use are compatible with the surrounding area, • Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. • The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment. Pursuant to the Intedocal Agreement with Pinellas County, review by the Pinellas Planning Council will not be required for the plan amendment. The Community Development Board reviewed these applications at their public hearing meeting of October 17, 2000 recommended approval of all applications. r l ' i 1 ORDINANCE NO. 6625-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET EAST OF OAK FOREST DRIVE E, CONSISTING OF . M&B 32104 IN SECTION 04, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1880 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby, annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: See attached Exhibit "A" (ANX 00-09-18) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The. City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: X-Iv? . ?'Ile - ??li ;'Z' Leslie K. Dougall-Sic(.; Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6625-00 ,.1 Y??;6E: f.;.:;t.v}?C;4dL3k"=.:°??.qi. <. ..;.J,isa..'Nct.°t•?".. .. o .- „_. ... ... ... . r iti?1 i?? .; J '6U l rl, sti+E'1IaC lu. CAST DESCRIPTION'. i n part or the N.M. 1/4 o th6 S.W. 1/4 of Section 4, Township-29 South, i Range 16 East, Pinellas County, F1orida.being more particularly described I' as follows,: . Commence' at the 'northeast corner of the N.W. 1/4 of the ! S.W. 1/4 of said Section 4 'and ego S. 00'--1Z' ?-54" W. , 32.93 feet, along ec boundary ,of , said N . W. 1/4 of the S . W. 1/4 , (centerline of Mca4iullen-Booth a Road,' State Road No. • 593)-; thence N. 39°-47'-06" W. , 50.00 feet, to t'r.e I Point of Beginning; thence S. 00°-12.'-54" W., 436.98 feet, along a line ' 50.00 feet West of and parallel to the east boundary of the N.W. l/4 oz' t S.11. -1/4 of said Section 4 (centerline of McMullen-Booth Road, State Roue No. 5.93) ; thence N. 89°-4.7' -0n" W. , 437.41 feat; thence N. 45°-14' -.35" E. ' I 6x8:29 feet, to'the Point of Beginning containing 2.194 acres., moxe or Le Exhibit11 11 F, Ile L M D R `jlJl?lr;,'i; i I 1,i T?; I .r J?Q/?p 'r :•?'' I?L- - SAfY IIAFFiIjF:, r - - air-tr?tr,u:r?l•rr .C:J7.' $76; , ? °I? _ . ? ? - ? ? ? '.° ? • ? . `?• '• •?'-? to ?1:: ''''' :.:' :, n N 7R, r, r' ACRES T ATLS (a19: 69-17 t;: K ??? ! : ??? J3! ' I - D ARE S tREET . t rZG! I •?H ar'_;?yt ;•• + I 0.? Ya in ? ;rr- I .1" '.i.?7 d ? .r'.ti„ rr. • •1.?, ?t\! ,.. ? :O :i.; I ?`? W I `.',' _: -:•, i:': .s ,` r. ,>.:i•?.r tii :'a: -:'``AIL .! -rl i 1? .•"y;• y •; 1'r.f„ 4? li'.r ? . ?;; '.\?••r• yr'4: •L ?: J,i, -!F1$ r J I V 1-430 } I :'t:?'r. -F ;•'?y, Syc:'r ,.. >e'..._ +'p. t a ,. :':::::r.:' ?. e 7 b;' r.+lt --?r ip J953 J r• ?-.. I ^? ???' ?.};'r;,?.•??+??J t. '• i•i....?17 r yr,•: ::irU..•i• +'c?;',.:ry:::''•' '.?;i.. ?r .r_tir.•.;i+. 1 ?/51` y' c ';• 'r •V?'.tt?•' - •?sr• G.3 Z' r•. ??T.', y..:?t;,. ?1. t; .??,.', ar .{; :L ?Fj: O C ? 1 ..tl -?.r r? ? •r' ,^l,rT.::.::+'? ? .:.??J t.l?..'t :: •'.17a°? ri'? +,'? I.d.;'t1 ?!asr :. ";?,' 't ?.: ,: ?•• a?• :Ji:r C'ra•; .\•s'4 .?",?,y:! tri.','„:: \.w:?. ••,'? 1 ??, •• ?'r t? .}• <:•- ti L ? ?`? ??r' C]?,SF?-. :?.f t. '' ?'` .S. 1''.. rr1 u: jai'''' 'L'?' :??:?i? D-R, r? / E:'i???'?.' ..e1 ? .L._J{ 'q .i??:• ?r..i ?.,.t ;?,?:,'" 7 , e>• J7, t:, -Is.•. 5z {•- F7 r r .n.., .',?1,`??,%{?...v'ii1'[r;1?1?:..4 .E'.1LJ':?;;: irS(l+ ?7 .a}?jT}l14 i'. a?5r'?,,'y1u`.?r'' \i•k?S• 7 I/i 'F, / i I.; •? , a. , .' ,?,..,r J;. f?rj.':.i: 4.:'':? r h;• ?:; I.. 1..1..5 .L" •v I; f "r71 Lit JUSJ _ / /'. ?? ?a5p'](f•-'!Y,'<4'•'• rrrp I>•.,{3•:}-4•.;C?a'r.? ;r.; ;: otIS4 YnElrfri;J' G rrtn?'' 1i -4 Z' " ? i •?, i~e rr` • /• .r: ?,.i + '' J??Q ?:r: "t+?.'?+• V? y•:::Li''{ '. ' F..., ?t• r !; •+ . ?.. tIr5/ .. l,?t?+:l S\1 ,. '[,;.p. 0 ' / / .. .•., .f ?: •.'_. .'. i, ..1:.'?•?.l •:' :. ?" :Y 5..,.1 ?• ?!: Ir• ??Lt.:f•' 1. Jt , iL. 6 y? I,` /'r ?\iiys*9523E9119'?5$11 'j ;4.. ? 46 ` t}! / r i e':i ti('.E;'s+.:".;t ' ? .. w, y '-'rw • i / I s': trYi kt'Y,.• .t .?i ti ei\?''i:`S':Ya { ,'+ Stf :J 4; ?. 'i,,'4?' ??? ( > i ,; •\ ?,??.???,r?.. 3?_.t•L1,-^'•r.' j ,.?j' ., e,. .:?r a'ST..?',L?Mir*?a3rrf,?;? 1 k'it. t;:' 1 .?3 I r9 f ? ra• //+ ?^ 1 i :'`J. ??? ? •r•.' 1:???•'i•:'l.l+a•;1 :. [i t_-r'.: ??,,Lr: }??, .M{`711 .?? Jf ?ty,?,rT} 1? rs A yr JO / V /:f ,? ?? r-- - ': c•i ,t :• ' 1.1 t •7, ;?•???y`'r ?., _'' vf. t I L f ? r1\ ? ? I _ 1 ? 1 ??}-+:.n:. ; ??Y rr ?f .?.. f??:1 ? 9• +'. .• ,.?? ?•r ? • },rl .1 /?' ? l?,l ? 1 m :.:'s: • (n'.,?Jyr .; i:l . t:o• ....iir-"..i i' ' ?G? ,rti? orY;r:. / R` -? I/ f er qr1:; ?.r. r tl :'b t t zts' .?1:7 AN f '\ .? .3/?' :?;! ?:a. r{i'trFti? 3 ?:f ?' r?,. !+ Ii , rn , r0 Est - Y V'r'•r, e•i??"t';•" ?'V /may i \\ •% { { I ?'.1??-'.?17•;r?iJr :]7•• y -?? t ?'•t ('?.i yS; a' A .'Fr iR'vr~ `!.Q : ? - J ? jjj '.?''-''rti?i."7t5?'r'•r:'1 i )si' •?: :: ••'? t' ,;,?, ..?,}•5 .?riS •?'!•????1::.?. •? . ?r.,' i / \ ? y'rf ? ? I ? I , ? ? ?;? ra r.•; .: ? r?'.iy'a' ? ?T? r ; •y. ,? _.N??? .Y:?Sti ?. .r.:1'?ybl? :1='T' ??7 o C\ I I 11 i.zr' r ;[l?? J: r, 'ii ;} :.15 ?•' ?t%» ?r. m '04 i ,?.?,-• ?? I ',: 3,• ': r. r?'; C;.' v{ _: . r : J,'t7,r+`r •;a; r e." A' Qt i? y_ a% ([ I I v,i,?,; ','i l'.i f •:? " ; :i,LtSr >.. ?,[{? ? ? O.'.;,.•?e' ??•ts7• i iYT? i 7 ' r ? ?,.,, ? I ? '.r..?:• , •. ., i;' ' .;.{S , - ?":i.?l.t-',t7'C??1 r •C"?s??i? t.':[:?.t,sti?a , • w? ` `i .:: _ I`',,.L1.1,'..?:•+ 4 -:r. i lr'.haaC;r+ tR ?• ?A _ •?' '? r/ i i ..-•- --"? • : =Jr..: - •? I ? .. ?;1? ? i ? ..?,, is (B?-).??:'.' '. 'T R' L T PROPOSED AiWIEXATION AND ZOMMG CLASSIFICATION ADDRESS: FIOPC_'r_Y -- " DE=SCRIPTIOt'J: LAMD USE PLAN w0INING ERO1 : - ?ROPER T Y SIZE ACRG3: 0.3 TO: '+v }y Size A; ATLAS PAGE? SE C: T'N l'r0!+i?r umi T Y DEVE, Lip`r vi 30.?R0• CIT Y 00 M MISSIC,N: J .Od-b L C A Ord Liiance No. 6625-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6626-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE .COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET EAST.OF OAK FOREST DRIVE E, CONSISTING OF M&B 32104 IN SECTION 04, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1880 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Property Land Use Category See attached Exhibit "A" Residential Suburban (ANX 00-09-18) Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6625-00, and subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to ffor Leslie K. Dougail-Sides Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6626-00 ,,, .,., ?,.-?ixwi' ? i} vre ° :7?.• Y'r. • , -{l ,`J _ IJ;r.. .,',.r.. ?Y ••s:l .., ... .. ., .. y• 'tt ?, . ?r S?f+Oo x ?' ?.? •rjjr,.7?f ?.?i: ?.` ;;'.rdSj}:.ye+..< ...« ....?,ae, :•-' '° . ; ? ' ' ?L`. i ??J4?, ? ? V?5\.l+•?1? 4 ? i1.%V ,? C'1• et M1.?7? .yl. l? MM.7 ? • DESCRIPTION, t+ part of the N.W. 1/4 of the. S.W. 1/4, of Section 4, Township. 29 South, ' Ranee 16Bast., Pinellas County, Florida being more particularly describes' as follows:.-Commence"at the northeast corner of the N.W. 1/4 of .'the S,. t1. 1/4' of said Section g and coo 5.'. 00°--12'--54" W. , 32,95 feet, along ea boundary o` . said N.W. 1/4 of the. 5 : W. 1/4, (centerline of McMull en-Booth Toad, State Road No. .593); thence N. 89°-47'--06" W., 50.00.feet , to the- Point, of Beginning; thence S. 00°-12'--54" W., 436.98 feet-, along a line 50.00 feet west of.and parallel to the east boundary of the N.W. 1/4-of t S . t•1. ]./4 of. said Section 4 (centerline of McMullen-Booth Road, State Roa } No. 5.93): thence N. 89°-471-00" W., 437.41 feet;; thence LN. 45°'e-1 4'-.3S" E . -18.29 feet, to' the Point of Beginning'containing 2.194 acres., m . ore or.le, . Exhibit "A" m f m: L 1A S?,PIScI rQ?,?l'f ! ' i' rr ,>tik;?l'/'k1A?iUf?', r POAD ?99) WO OD ji! DR. ' 7 - ? 1, ? .. ?' ? ,5• ? i• .:,.l r•.?. •1 {','•`G I y i r ;I .. ., tt:;.. .C. .r? t •.r.,. r 1 ?.. RTES ,'1Ig7 QC?- 1 I a. - , _ ?r^;' inslsr737 :r' _!!! _ ± ?- I OED ARE•:.STREET 77 - f:4:7 I T9,. ?(? 1.71E ? ? {I ti'? • ;.?; •" .:.- "?: 5.+..?;. ?f,",r'„• :=,..,i; :r. J 71 ri ?f ! _ _,'I ??: ?'• 5??;'x' 3 ?:: t.;ri_;; ii •: rLlt?`;r:.• 4';.1:`i' `'i 113C_ ? l.Jd9 r ,?''?, \,f`i ;y.: q, t , is :,.y;r, •.tiif, •r,IZ ?_ !1 •© '97? <v ? -7 ? . .y',. •r? -?r? '. „1? ?.:?i? ..1 ?• t ,??+r'? ?1'.e,-?.e •'.iiY -Y.It.. j t rt1: .• IJS53r,. -( :'3 j [[ ?F .•i. ''.? .??, \ _ _ ;.,,. [.J ?,;;' ?r";r': ;.;??i':,1i::4;';"`•:';: :1'": ?. ? '1«r.,;t.i.r'.?• •''stv .:fr..rrT':?:. •.S;i;.+^ qr,y .r?... i fy:7 O 4. ?. :'i''1,`?? ,I:.t.",'; t'i;Y'14 ?t: ''!p'an•,'1 r;r'' jjrr ??? .?j:: "', : •.?•ti. .4'i., +•:n :: •li; i ;3' •'• .•C7y 1•••'< I . +' ??' .:}l+'•' i ?. - }+r ' ; ? :Gt'? Cn: '4. ,••.{:? • °.r.?I'4r'_":•C L_.4... :. , u.?.ryf M?'4. ..Y ?5,? r??1?'- `,.? ?',? V ! ter? i ? 1 .:•.??.,, ;r`.?x?©i?1t...,,,..? `,z `???!'. Si.:'• ?, TRAG' ? $y F•• I! :F: . ? r !a •1• ?..?'•r' ,??'' ,J+:? •' '' "a i:s??^ i'?'rti ?:;' ?:, ?`}'?'':??Y'I ls' t?'-'t•'i } •r' 'r`• ! I •?? ?.• f }• ,'Y,. '.ar a? ! ?: 4 Fy, ? ?l ?.J?I'.` r+?I ?. lr}I }ai.+?t? •'T •.1! • W !I 713?? °5???'-wr5?.y:: ,'.' ? '1?:•.:?el,`,..'•: ,LL.t':i •:, i'r.4 t?l:dn?dt fltlrf,: ?L3SC????.? .: it `? C!1 ?µ' C ':? f ?-,: , E;, , s "'198.k} s'. } t.. y,?.,_ •} ?? `u • • •es?r. ;t+, ?•»::?•:? r r f;' 'x•. .4•r •ff =Sr, ? 1 +. ' YaISI,..`YY1''Y' , •.Y }.'.lV•.._ {.wt + 5, 'r'at"-,-r .., •''. :? ?J n J + jj -. ??r?+ s1'.. ? -rl y.l., `'.° i ? .?I::.}?: ,I. "1.:i^'. r•Tyt 'J'7 / r p'::5 •'ti?• 'y''"' •M1::iriti., ??• .r?d. i,?4, a• rH. :ir'Il7?.i.: 4 rYr""';L}.,'r .i •ry.• ,?,,r i1' i:l• ?? .a? f//C :if •• r I '/vim` .?-Jle; `•W'Li?.• ;,'?";y ?:.J +rt JO f "1v/f /•? .f sl'r ::•fi•:i ^. S+f •r: :1' ':!'''"r•'CP'r w7:S.:;F '^i.??i• ?L•rfr 51??: fi. ,. 4 I' Y..?.? ?iti 1.y ?ti%' 1'?}?li,••+- a Ali _. 1 ?'?` / • .?5,^, yr '•? •r+ r_ "! ? .r,. ,??•..J.• Irv Jv a 5t, ?? ?5 .' jlr,1. • •??'?;..? ! • ? _ { I1T1'-?•'?. ,I-? # ? i' `•n t (,Ll•? t. '»e. wi r• ,)~ 7.r T " ? '¢ ? •^??" ''? ? i L.._.._J ?:`?•`_:[.CS:.-, ;,.cam •4 :, iti? :? fl!' ? .?'} , to ,rx'{?, ..i,,? ;'•, lR.. /??. .` ? f I I f ??: `.:atii!s=;. F?,fi ., 'v'.-i -? ",a?yM,i'- r. •'?a i?C?F,'?y •t? .+•??,?r .'1;"'?51'! 8 KJ ??• I I i q,l i3 't' ?'. . . ?;'. 11 J, J`rti' CJr` .?•;? ? ,. ' ? r ? I I ? i 1 i .:1 '°-°•' r:rt??ft(t': r ?.... ; ? ??: tJ;.?4'?Sr4fq,:.' fJl. ti>;, ,. y •. .i'N?G ? ? / ? .? ' '?]?`'? ?. `I ! ? I ` ? ? ; 1''l ? f?'ri?tiy?~?5.4•i ?, {e.! t ??.. '?Q:???? •.? r '? r' r t ( i ire ? "l?i•? ??: I. '?'` ?LSt?;:. ?i' , ` }'' L,'`t' a ... 151 ? .tom /???: ('? /?f ^? I gig I i 1 ? I 1 , r .t"-. 1.,?•'n'':. `?:}?N: i ?'t? 1 I ,?,'1 ._.s r i ?1'T r,? 7 i5r• [? rECfCr i`' "/? ? 1 I I _'..1.: ..,. r :e ",t L^ t t ,il'+.••y .,t.•.'?'•', e•y,• hay •' J * 5, t 7 .•?.? ?? :_j 1 ( I 1?_ r j •i';'s':' :'.''t'I ,,.f I?yj1 :j:?l,:r'[.sF i:eT?:. 01 i • ?i ` Jr •? ' ?• ?l '_? T :i !1 1 y+. -1'':? ? 7•, u. r, ?; .. 5Y' . ? un ". ? " • ? 5•r'•?`` • ,,/ t i __T_- I .. ?:,.'.i•r. a;: ?'??rr: ? : •?! ??•/: II:.S ?•?'Sr '?•''1 •` `,. 3 .. '.' ... , ; , • ?.?; 'Si'p " N ? /' ? I ' _ w ? I : ?,r, , +, ? i'? _?•'r, •? ?" r+e?tJ' r 1I` PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASS iF1CAT1ON ADDRESS: PROPERTY DE SCP1P T IO1N: i.AMC USA A.1 Z0?IN1NG a0 1i: -: r PROPERT'f 317= ACRES: '- ;.3 ---'- - - T Q - - - -?.?._- - _ - - - - - -..- -- aTLA:3 PA'E: CO`rf?tilSSIvA1: r;0'.i!11U1`lI T'( DEVELOPMENT 30AR0' CITY Ordirianee No. 6626-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6627-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE' ZONING. ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING . CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE-WEST SIDE OF f t MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET EAST. OF OAK FOREST DRIVE E, CONSISTING OF M&B 32104 IN SECTION 04, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE . POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 9880 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now; therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Pr©e Zoning District See attached Exhibit "A" Low Density Residential (LDR) (ANX 00-09-18) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance'shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6625-00. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-S' a Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 6627-00 t+11JJ k f;F '"Ikik`dk,g.. rp.f. ek=k:. A'e?"...t• '(: :K`t? fir !: Ri.rn. - , n 5CC { ltJ,q 4 \MlkqljC ^S T DESCRIPTION' A part or . the 1/4 of the, S W- 1/4 of Section 4, Township 29 South, Range.lG' :ast, Pinellas County, CLorida being more particularly-.de'scribec as -folrlows:.. Commence at the northeast corner of the N.W. 1/4 of the S. t1. ?1/4 of said Section 4 anti cjo S. 00°-12';-54" W., 32.98 feet, along •ea boundary of,said N.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4, (centerline of McMullen-Booth t '.oat`, State Roar: No. 593) ; thence rJ. 89°-47 `-06" W., 50.00 feet, to'-the 4 Point'of Beginning; thence S. 00°-12'-54" W., 436.98 feet, al.ong'a line 50.00 feet west of and -parallel to the. east boundary of the N.W. 1/4 of t' S.W. .1/4 of said 'Section 4 (centerline of McMullen-Booth Road, State Rou ' "Nio. 5.93) ; thence N. 89°-47' -00" W. , 437.41 feet; thence h.. 450-141-.3511 E. 613.29 'feet, to' the Point of Beginning containing 2.194 acres., more or le Exhibit "A" s I r r #... _..__ LM - ROAD: R-j .r r'' .. - .Fr -..I?•," .?'?' tr f. ??,ti ;.? ..Sn?k T;f '1 ?1;??Ur?:r i'.-r-.,t`,-.-;w•. SUMS ET f ('PLl NV J .-...__ ' ? ..., r'S359 J. i3.'' ,'s,! ? •i::: S '?'l'%? i":'?.! :i.: :j ?• IYi\ti? ',`4 .. '' :ir: €!`177 woos G L... Y i C I c?• s.'I?. f S :' , i ;: '' k 's? •f%;"' i. y'ir s .J ? _,,,_? ? .-...?.L_ ..???. ?r .:S •? ? ?r'; F., sr,'% r',•".. k,_. ? ?i ,5I ? 7? .?.?:: ?•,:.,{(r ::?.'r JS ,ir. ; y? ? ?; '•' • ?r5':r t'• i l11. Y. ?• IlESti I W - ?! f'r'. "?!!.i •,.s. : .i"tf, ?',:•, :•''!..F'.1 . ? ,; 1. '. ``t i jM S?1 li' .ltu i'..? d .Jli r•?r? ,u u DR. N. .'J•":•;3'L; i.r; l!'1 „'.:' "?• .kr:.r '+, ??Jt'1 'r'F d s 4 w '' t(`[1 `20 _ \' ,` :t • a'b : 1'': f_"?4?• t '.F7 7s ?. . :'f ?' ?'li r ?L' .g f. w;J , , AES rur?3 69!-17? ', F. r' R.:.liI: s'''r''t.L? ;t:;:':_ ;. /y',!s,• i il`«algrro' a .,, ,? 'iC F? I I .. ?'1_l.?'. ?:?^' ?.i; i,a. •', sr' .i:.e ? '}:'?'.; ...• :, .irL :;!'??} • [J 6() "= ij; J' j,_ ••.. r. ,, .:;s: r'•Ju '''` q,' DE. A#i ?'SS•7IREG. 1196Z c f i , ..?1 ` >'i• rSJ' a`"'' r' li 2`;': F. r, ` :r, :89.3 1197 IyJ W ;A , t'r . ,'3::''..{, r:• 24 s i:?, Fl1.iFf '.i;.F,?.'.. } .•'1 ' '•. ? ., ?:. . s •: it ; ?', ,? i 1..' v i? f' :.li' '•f :' .,p ?,:` _ ?JR7l ,??» ?f °,?.`7'.s. 'i.:: '' : r'?•• ,'. V - 1 'V, ?}11•'t? ,' ? i .- ?- s ,.r?'F .;? S, C••'- 1t(,'.r. ';nrM1. (.u4. ''.2='i+t. ? `J9 a _ 72 ? -'' ?,• ,3Z?Ot?;. ?? :i:,.i':?'•,.'•'' •`'' 78 'i`r trnSs. 8??.... r r'S'f$.ggrs O , .,. '.., i, ?:w s;:•, •,,?rii.? •? t .f: ry.,. rN .r •. t?+..F:•s -00 f S 1 P lP,Bi ?j ',`,', .'r ? ? F. .r•,j," .?,-?'.'. 1'?:.t.j l.r•E:,:: F`' nr:."4?? •,. .?`.', ? ,%k, - '? "? ?, "y `?`t3 ?,? I `[;? `?` F-- •?'_'.? .,, .i. - :?t'???: :•i=•,?•'?, ?? •: ?.? .s?r•.\t'. :f.: r. :?Z''???}t?''iiv:7?1>;.u ''\`IF''?' '.'1? ! 184 f/1 !&; D !8; J ?. d .r ...y.:r•.i,f !S•• ti.. v-? , c Ht L'•=...rl?tf' ?,,..t 1 ?? ?f ?'?••ti,.. - ? t 81 ? .?? ;'. :,. TL. .k?Y;rr y tC',=+. ? ;?l'.y '.i ??}?';Y?, {?v .r•{??' SS ?.e? np,*'•' d i''.a=: ?:r lFi;i•.? ,t' .r. :., 'C7:?t r." y ?,. ?l,r?: ''s: 1. •? a .. ?•.s' •:?.: L.::i: .,tLF F ?'',r I`r;.. 'C] ?'{r;., in y fir' i. +4.•• . 7 ?_ -r. 'Sy i• ;'+?,.r'.Yw \' .1',S? i :1.• ]r,}'?:,ra+L'J?': e. f1 r 'vft' - '?':S 5 O .??'. ."':.5~?? Y: '? ? 4f•: 'i• ?.i D. Y'?;I ??`"???AF,"/t?; k 1c ?, 1? ?? ?% ? ?' 1886 4 I ; ?r!i; :i i< may. t ti '•;r.r _, ,f t ,u . : ?. . .9,}/ ' +I, 1 ai• t 7, ?gr? 0 1865 U. ,ft -.-..? iQ i r 'ts:,: .:+ }I,r•y' ,?? ??. ,r,:„it ham. ; r,lr F1JS, l?•{1 *7 ?' i\-11.?'"S' rX` ";5?• ti°'l't!!`?': ? 1877 ??•.i:a ;frylj' `??t7 . sr<2? '?;h.C)'i`:'IG r;i.r ., +y'•:?,r.Y14'.? j ""Nt•??t r., r? I? ?.?ra. !!I: 3 r ;?• ?. 1p•' +' fr cr,ti' y .,!{j f?L •?..i1` [,'t r':. ' ? ?? r J1l5.gnf :9 Y .•r;' - ,S..1 s;r s i•„? L'"_ .!! ?• r?? r ?'°•• r L•i: t,.y .1 r `? ; ( t.t>i"''fc',s? ??r; ?{i?.Q }r fftl rTC i:? i ra xls? ?;.?' rti ,?rf':,• s'c.,-:+ Y? , 1876 Q "s• 4 :f• •1', ISy a.•1? ?0??? `!.!'t .i 'i s '.?'J',•'?1:?Y?..''?1,L•i,}'yi ?,i,.,!'' •a '1 ?'•??? '.Z r.iJ; r 1. ?T.,?"'4' .?' /'•? nt?.?J.• y? o.-S :.M1rn-+ ,?F I ,1 ? ik e. ?:.} ; #ir ? r +t•.I' ,:}jr ?"y,'I. 1+ rt., }' ?r ?T,r,?'I?.y,+7?'. ?`:?1-17.p?;,y?;?'.y?: JAY' ,?;i,+}?' :?%[G Fstr. •F ,? y. .?4Y?, {???, r, : r •'••,,++?,_. ?R,; J..F ? ? i L'i',r 1?' 1\,s..? f t :v .1.f7,. .11:`S ,F 4?'' I, .; r .•i.', ?`C]'r f~ rfe e:i.i, s-1:!z? a ?Tt t' c] ,:... ??_ s?t? s.. f. pi's k?? 9 r?"'?It•? ? G 'rti' ` ?r•r?'? f ? ??+ '?'? h?? r?ilr• r 55 w r ?' ? ?r ?`f ?i? sr?'?-1J `l?s????r' r ?%.,?, f•`l. ?•D??f?Y s?xYh .?'.;?•;?Yif?!}+?t? ? ?t?;y??' :???'t (y ? y , , . ze t ?i s yf•r. t_ i; f` r.• v iltV sf ?. r` r 1 +t''f- r t:>•.l,?s i i $ 66 w{]C'irJ??•Li„ 'rQ!,?Cf?lifrir rrJ .1,r.i' a`: ? 11153 i? "?' ?o5f?` Wi-"'N L?i C Jr, a Fa i r` y t, 1• + W o/' ltt + { t/y +t'.: Si r f• ! ?' ,,?'{ s. ;?? J .i -?,}} '? x? ?f ?. 'k: r L s , i ! ?- +,rS. Q.' ,. : „ t ! it'I. i't}'•? .`.z'?f'gl,(l:v ?y[''. f.%71•r?{c• Ct'I rl 11'' !:1ia_? Ff Sf W r„ 6 d G7 ` ???l Ti'1l????•dlf l! 1D?# t;4 t 3a'?! .I'w7' y?'f'ti4 a 1\'t+.h? 1JL,f^'r'IN?{ D li. 6 7 i .''_ ?? 1s,?, t9pk ',,rf, . ,l.? r••r =, ,lr, ` t1l; 1 J-1 1 ,?? 18 ? ?.\ a I. ...5 X.?Y}F.T,? ? J;•??? '?o. 11'?a.r?`~i`s?k,?:'i' ,?;M:,??,•?!'s?S+I iJ' ?, ?? 6U fif ? / \` .l'-"-. . f ?•r. '1 ?;...13?fs? ;. ? ! ''k ,:;1r?? :Fji?ii?'?;?ikf?.l?t•r "" ' °'? ?ksR?ll 53 3' ' '? ' •' / .? i tom'`', ..{ ? r? t?, tz ''i'l t r r4 3' ?''r?'; `? •;,?" ' F ? d0 r _ y'??'} ?Jil:!7 ;=a.ty n_`'rijtJ-rfK;,r`Ji r ' , F•f '?/Q• ? .;p `\ ? o`' :i ?r"J al ? i ? Y ' (\ R ru•'\ iskJ'''I , ?k' '? ?'? A• ?• I 5 I ? ?/? \`; d ? ,, ?_ r ?'.??'ru'= ?F? :s fi? 1. -• f r 'i:S' iv.tr?'Yf ?,1l?et?•?SL ?? ,a'?'.?, ' .??? X, ILI ?C .n a ;'M ?`J?f1• rl{hr 3,r ?'?•:?'?( a0 H ,,7b'?? 5 t ` :?\ ? , r? ? I :''f uT jh?,?a?? o? ja f bf'?? • '''' rt,`•ft ;' ttrFb, ?_ i+.*„J', :% -, f ? f ? ?• ?? .R r.1};?i:JF? r ?!ftA F f.v' r,? ?4 ?+ ,YY ?.?•fy?'F ?faii ;?L ?+/ C ? ? / J I ? I I I `,!.} ?:??i.?l`.y?? ? fA? l•' M. '• yyl`?? •.Y? '.'StJrr??' • ?`'r•.,. OQ'? ?,Y \ e •? ?1J??II ?:`,l::i::?j, `.7.4. y?I \:rkNN ' C?` ? ? t{?•IL\41 r: 'FCt?f'' ?,. L 1. :?. YL? `P??F?`\ 'r' ?? ? r? _ .-. r= lLr50 frry? .,?'J ?:r?.?: ? '4•r r',.?'•yti.§;?' ov '; }:! 't-'i?1 -rl? xi'l? ?? ? :rr Est '• ?r?"? ,'ta,::..r ,. .? ya> ? 4i •? ?'`` 115 f ?' I ''t •''t"''?''` ` -d 4?'?s,''r El ?••?.?ts?: ''' r 'Ti! ?; tii ,??.:.• 20 % 21 PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION =' I l' ?'' ,, r = = l_ {' I Case: ..-- 1: - ; - OWNER: ADDRESS: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: .. ; ... --'-- -' - LAND USE PLAN ZONING FR 0M: PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.$9 T 0: Right-o 'n1ly 5iz^. Acres: ATLAS PAGE: ?. SEC: TN P: RANGE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD- CITY COMMISSION: Ordinance No. 6627-•00 z . J . T CDB Meeting Date October 17, 2000 Case No. ANC 00-09-I8 Agenda Item: C. 9. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER(S): RIC Properties Limited APPLICANT: City of Clearwater (Pursuant to Agreement to Annex dated October 10, 1980) LOCA'T'ION: 1880 McMullen Booth Road, on the west side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 300 feet south of Sunset Point Road. REQUEST: To annex the property into the City of Clearwater in accordance with the provisions of approved Agreement to Annex and approve the appropriate City land use plan category and zoning district. SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 38,745 square feet or 0.89 acres Dimensions of property:. Lot width of 105 feet by 369 feet deep PROPERTY USE Current Use: Day Care Proposed Use: Day Care PLAN CATEGORY Current County Plan Category: Residential Suburban Proposed City Plan Category: Residential Suburban ZONING DISTRICT Current County Zoning District: Rural Residential (R-R) Proposed City Zoning District: Low Density Residential (LDR) BACKGROUND INFORMATION : The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (R-R) under County Zoning district with a compatible Countywide Land Use Plan cla ssification of Residential Suburban. According CDa ANX 00-09-18 October 17, 2000 . Page 2 to the Pinellas County records, this site was found to be in compliance with Pinellas County zoning regulations for the use of site for a day care center. On January 3, 1980, the property owner received a preliminary site plan approval to utilize this site for a day care. A final site plan was approved by the Pinellas County Site Plan Review System on September 19, 1980. Since then, the use at this site as a day care center has not changed. On October 10, 1980, the previous owner of this property entered into an Agreement to Annex (ATA) the subject property with the City of Clearwater in order to connect to the City sewer and water facilities. At that time, the subject property was located outside the municipal boundaries of the City of Clearwater and did not meet the adjacency requirements for a voluntary annexation. The terms and provisions of that agreement are binding upon the previous owners, their successors, assigns, or any subsequent owner of this property. It was agreed that at such time as it would become possible for the City to annex the property, that the ATA would constitute an application to annex at that time. The subject property is now contiguous to the existing city boundaries to the south of this property. The City was also required to give the property owner 60 days written notice of its intent to annex this property. This requirement has been met and a notice letter was sent to the current property owner on June 28, 2000. The notice expired on August 29, 2000. No open space impact fee is required at this time. The previous owner had paid the applicable open space impact fee based on the City's Recreation and Open Space impact fee ordinance adopted on July 7, 1983. The current owner of the property is RIC Properties, Inc. ANALYSIS The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request in order to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and conditions established in the ATA agreement of October 10, 1980. The subject property is now contiguous with the existing City boundaries and it is consistent with the Florida statutes with regard to the requirements for voluntary annexation. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Suburban and it is proposed to be zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). However, the existing use is legally non-conforming pursuant to the City's Community Development Code as the LDR district does not allow day care. The subject property is the LaPetite Learning Center/Academy which was lawfully established since 1980 under Pinellas County Zoning regulations. CDB ANX 00-09-18 October 17, 2000 Page 3 1. IMPACT ON'CITY SERVICES Water and Sewer The City of Clearwater has been providing water and sewer services to the subject property since October 10, 1980 and capacity for the project continues to be available for both utilities. Therefore, this annexation will not have any effect on public facilities. In addition, the City's ability to serve the overall site had previously been documented through the previous ATA annexation agreement. Moreover, the previous owner had paid the required sanitary sewer impact and assessment fees applicable at that time. Solid Waste Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal. agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's Resource Recovery Plant and capacity is available to serve the property. Police: The property is located within the East Police District and service will be administered through the District 3 Station located at 2851 McMullen Booth Road. Community policing service will be provided through the City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect police service and response time. Fire and Emer enc Medical Services Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to the property by Station #49 located at 520 Sky Harbor Drive south of Clearwater Mall. The Fire Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time. In summary, the proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public facilities and their level of service. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan designate the site as Residential Suburban whose intent is to recognize suburban low density residential areas. Residential uses are the primary uses in this plan category up to a maximum of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. Other permissible uses in the Residential Suburban plan category I CDD ANX 00-06-11 October 17, 2000 Page 4 include Public/Semi-Public uses, schools, ancillary non-residential and Recreation/Open Space uses. The annexation does not propose to change the Residential Suburban plan category. Further, the annexation promotes infill development as stated in Objective 2.4 of the Future Land Use Plan: 2.4 Objective - In considering extension of service and facilities, Clearwater shall actively encourage hifill development. In summary, the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan both in the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies of the Plan. III. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS The appropriate zoning district under the new Community Development Code is the Low Density Residential (LDR) District whose dimensional requirements are consistent'with the surrounding development to the north and west of this property. It is the purpose of the LDR to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing and stable residential neighborhoods of low density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods. The application for annexation covers a site with a let area of 38,745 square feet or 0.89 acres which exceeds the minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet required for a detached dwelling home in the LDR zoning district. However, the current use at the subject site is a day care center which is a non-conforming use and inconsistent with the LDR zoning district. Because the site was legally established for use as a day care center since September 19, 1980 and the use has not changed since then, the existing use at this site is regarded as legally non-conforming and may be grand-fathered. Nonconformity is defined as "any lot, structure, use or other feature of the property regulated under the provisions of the Community Development Code which was lawfully established but which on the effective date of the Community Development Code, or any amendment thereto, does not comply with the requirements of the Development Code." As a non-conforming use, the property owner is aware that the existing non-conforming use shall not be expanded nor changed to any other use unless the new use conforms to the standards of the zoning district in which it is located. Once a nonconforming use is changed to a conforming use, the nonconforming use shall not be re-established, in CDs ANX 00-06-11 August 15, 2000 Page 5 addition to complying with other provisions contained in Section 6-103 (A-F) of the Community Development Code as they relate specifically to nonconforming uses. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN There is no change requested in the Comprehensive Plan category of the site that will remain Residential Suburban with a maximum density/intensity that will not exceed a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.30 and an impervious surface ratio (ISR) of 0.60 for non-residential use. According to Special Act 88-464 which established the Pinellas Planning Council, annexations of less than 10 acres do not require the review of the Council nor of the Countywide Planning Authority. Therefore, due to the small size of this property, review by theTinellas Planning Council is not required. There are no other Countywide Plan policies applicable to this application. V. CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA LAW Florida Statutes require that a proposed annexation be both contiguous with the existing municipal boundaries and compact in its concentration (Florida Statutes Chapter 171). This property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the south of the property and therefore, represents a logical extension of the existing boundaries. The compact standard of Florida law requires that the annexation does not create an enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries. The annexation of annexation of this property is consistent with this standard and no new enclave will be created by annexation of this property. In summary, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law. VI. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS The existing use is nonconforming in this zoning district. In addition, the response from the Community Response Team indicates that there is a banner sign on the fence, no handicapped parking space is available at the site, and that parking lot needs re-striping. The Community Response Team will work with the property owner to bring the property into compliance with the City Community Development Code following the annexation. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Clearwater has been providing water and sewer services to the subject property since October 10, 1950 and capacity continues to be available for both utilities. Therefore the proposed annexation of this property will not affect the provision of public • `r CDB ANX 00-06-11 August 15, 2000 Page b ,. facilities. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. The site is currently used as a day care center and it is a non-conforming use, However, the existing use was established prior to the adoption of the Community Development Code. Because the site was legally established for use as a day care center since September 9, 1980, and the use has not changed since then, this use is'legally nonconforming and will be grand-fathered in as such. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the request:. 1. Recommend APPROVAL of the annexation of the property located at 1880 McMullen Booth Road. 2. Recommend APPROVAL of the Residential Suburban plan category, pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, 3. Recommend APPROVAL of the Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. Prepared by: E,tim S. Udoh, Senior Planner Attachments Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Land Use Map Surrounding Uses Map Zoning Atlas & Utilities Maps Locat.ion Map 'ucPropeives, Ltd. NORTH 1880Afc fuMw Booth Road 1"=1520' ANX 00-09-18 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY 19% 0 u LAW- E a CEO PA H d1lNC[1Y nM/?/ Pr N BEtHANY ?? 0 s 0r h.M/ Pf S t1 1! G' rrAY we9n Qa f^' V PROJECT (o SATE NOWEVE 4 5 O i U. SS?6 SlM a F ? n? rnwr 0 01r "S vAa ? CYFi7 SS u ft? v 9 g o n I Map \?v cl D [le?l IS u C l dOOtN ? P try G D s s O? '>7Me5 a > i ` uu.aNVw t y 3r ? b Y 2 Y ? em erN 51 ST N ? ? O 01 CK Ch = FT SRO ? El N N w SR 500 w m" i N ? ? y onAw.ec sr > ? AI o© /!J([ 3T n p p qKp sA SSfL u. ?55UL+N ? r ?t? $T 17 S K© 4TKi? W ???? s ?r arcO?e?? [R BLVO . ~ etH S R 590 CLEAR wAIEfi (TT HAROM 0 tQ ; AT OR FUN r ON N u [? l?l......JJJ V? ? ylN{- I OK s ? ry SH©?E S? {l JJ???I/?_ n+ DO i)L?1) CJ•??,CJ?' NAVEL CO r. CRAP ?, f np'r W tACNw000 W ST r O ARU[ A? CANOLEwOOp srK NOIIEN000 ? $ ? . ? SUU i CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION _., ENGINEERING +j4y yS3,idk;i.f. .L'?I':?}trairt°:,?i;,J[' {.''v' ,.i ?r'r '•r' ' .f• :E - 57?: IZI Y;;::S,.?•. ''•A •L,''i? ??:? t°3„'t• sr 'I' ,t•' ., ?. ,t• f .t !. ., ?. ,,'4?? ,p?'?`,,,1-?'••?,''?y????5 ?`i ??ly?l?':ri?ir'L,?":li,??k`:?Y:s.il?,:,.ti<>,,.•?•f:??AYr.:.ar(<Se•;t.:.y'?•r.;::: ..!a. ? .. 4 "fe?• `ai •f„+-c Jt?;? :ib ?f'u?•'£7yy``??., ?,.?. P?r?, {•'F.,,?; •?[ ,y';r?`^f'?. ??>'? •ES `'S ii.;,. ,? .E. ?l?,f .., ?{ ? ?° ?d. ???? G , ?` V ,??,; ;(t?:#l',tC;y X?r, cs••`fE d?r,?at -'i??,{•' a ip,?"rr- ?t'i;,f,?:, 1. ?«???'•:?;-a?;.?t ?? :F`",•..::.' -!. , W '??7 .;RR {{E ,. ? {'? r,t 2 ? ?( ?, 7jy? ??1 R„ G?.; „tuF,S;.?:;.,tg?;::`?';?.. ,?`. 3E?,; t?;,;;? ,?. .;lis ?.e .,,,,,i,_.?; ?''4,'•r;''?•'i??'? ,M? .•?' ..Y; `•`Jr ?Y2.; •+r ']S' ( _ 4 `?'f?' a}L,?t ;i rl ?a3 rf¢' .?/,; :.gi It;r f? .F ?,I.if,., ?r. f`•+ d'a ? .i`.s. 'l, -1' ,f,. ":;lt,v ,,:,?^4?t,•?T ? ! ? rr.;??rt?. .Ky[??r Ist.; Vii... , E:ip-,..Its•., E i'??cf4?' '-''v":'•` .ty.i,, r,s.i:, 1??1;': _ .S .V, °e'• S:t;l, ltc , Ir, }} K.I.S.f:- 'f'?••?.r r rr ?)_'} iel: F-.' .,. t r,} .. ,sl`-. t i •i ,: { ?.I?j^':a:.r?;'i .,5. ?.t . :'? b- • ^'{ i Z . !; ?.? •.,b t: { .. t,=s°. LJ?.} rsl r! f: f? i' I.a I 4a,. b P.? i'Ir "S.:y ?; .. `°r - 1 ' ?F `+•- I '?! ?F'? !« 'ri:: ;i1'?" •-.,, (.i;sti' °I .t?"5 1- .:i?, k"' Yf. i ,° y s r' ' ?? r . k3: M.• s ?a ?..?. .k• 'F '? t f?r' ??Y?i `?. „?` ;, 9s?ef ?; y. .a.. i .F.. >? z?7 ? 4r ?'i,??l ., _,,' ,,? r.! ._-i '4"?S??•iSf',., ?t ?. .7 . ? f i ?. ( r`, [.<? '•J .a. t:'r?'I? .f ?•. e ?', .i ff•[ 7?. i+?T'.i •" 1« :f I i1'ii?:;'':. f-tr':'.??>,-: a? `? Lf if'?r?i?. €.S?'?k°vi •",f' ? ?+?i. :"i FA°'r's?'.e .at%.^[J•.,S li?;'C?: [•Rt?..,.?r:s?'t?. r,j .. '? ?,'" .t ?r ft?'1s,i: r'?? ,t. t. t'? .:i°,'.. .i .t .'j'•? [l "i',?. ?' ?.' ' a'? t. , Ei.'.. '. r'•{•f? ??}?:'. a° s ,r?.. 11 ?f ,•, -? [. ?,'lc"?r`t' y?t ?}.{.• :s5 ?A'?,.4.r?.fn,??*'.37 is#}4 ,[??..'l,?:rr.. ,In .x,f 'rL ?F'i'sir?•{:?.r??[1'?•?, f. ??'1 ['! 'i...:: 6.'}; ?3, ,',', ./;- .?i'.. '?3'.!,fl• ??r=?• ',? a r?„1? ,? X } .=k, ?t :J- rf{s-,?? ? -?t.Ai` EAU .,9.. ".c.[.'r ,r.l,.?':.1,' r j • .? is t .i. ?,f. r ? ff F•3,'• it ?`t??.''' .": \ .? . ?? ?1' ..,•'?, t. `?ij'" ;,} 7°S •r n u., .;?1• •J:. ;.1<" ,ir ? tl+.' t.,. :1, ??-"?...? 'i:? .[, .r?. ?, .?,-;x. .'.ii; )? •a=;. s' jpt. .fi:`r a3? .i'? '?'i"u :;? n1: ?, e. •%' ??1, iris'. =?...: Fr' -}2' :'{'F;?Rt+• ?, A(?. ''•t r •'??•ta^f,' ±1 rd:..l ?+?• .. ::1? °. .. <. ,.. ?f .. ,•f .traps.=. ,uS'; ,. [s,Hb?.•S".<.. .?-. ,..,?4 p. s.Y...a l.. .. e„ ,r. ?Irlr;q •. r ?}?'' ;. I-Lem, e-Lt)' SUBJ3CT/MOMMENDA71ON: Clearwater City Cbmmission Agenda Cover Nlrmoranduyn .Worksession Item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: 1?f - November 16,00 • Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendments for 2071 Lantana Avenue; Owners: Jmaes H. Olson & W. Patricia C. Olson. M011ON: APPROVE the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment from County Residential' Urban to City Residential Urban and Zoning Atlas Amendment from County Zoning District Residential, One, Two and Three (R-4) Family District to City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Zoning District for 2071 Lantana Avenue (Lot 8, Block D, Brooklawn Subdivision) and PASS Ordinances No. 6628-00, 6629- 00 & 6630-00 on first reading. (CC ANX 00-09-13) N and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. StJ M MARY: This site is located at 2071 Lantana Avenue, on the east side of Lantana Avenue, approximately 230 feet south of Union Street. The purpose of the annexation is to allow the City of Clearwater to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the June 3, 1985 Agreement to Annex (ATA) between the City and previous owners. Effective with the annexation, the City will collect open space impact fees of $400.00 from the current property owner. The current use of the property is residential and the site is approximately 0.13 acres in size. The property is now served by the City of Clearwater water and sanitary sewer service pursuant to the agreement to annex. The property owner is aware of the payment of the outstanding open space impact fee which is due prior to the second reading. The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: The proposed annexation will not have an adverse impact on public facilities and their level of service. The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide Plan and the Community Development Code. The proposed annexation is contiguous to existing municipal boundaries, represents a logical extension of the boundaries and does not create an enclave. Reviewed by: Legal Into Svc NIA Originating De ? PLANNING DE Costs Total _ (ETIM S UD ) Budget NIA Public N/A User Dept• ??b Funding Source: Works Purchasing N/A DCMIACM Current Cl FY Ri sk Mgmt NIA Other Attachments OP ORDINANCESNO. 6628-00, Other 6629-00 & 6630-00 STAFF REPORT Submitted by: Q None city Manager , Appropriation rode: Prirded on remcled oam taev. 2198 .-e .., • .. .. , .tea- t a'y r ::1.' a }+f?./rti,•'';S'?o-?F?.IFi .:iii i >' " ' ` li?f''.?.:tiac'•IE.. ,p,,• .?.^,.g}. ?.,.?.. .:???'.,:. 1, ?:rz :. .?'. ?;S,.?G{•z.,.,,i,u.. .. '?X:D`.::Y'?'`?y ,# .. - .. 'z :l s'.: .,,.. .. ., , .. ,., ... r' CC ANX 00-09-13 - Jmaes H. Olson November 16, 2000 Page 2 , Since the proposed annexation site is less than•ten acres, the annexation will not require the review of the Pinellas, Planning Council., ! The Planning Department determined that the proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning applications are consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: ' The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning application are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. e . The potential range of uses, and the specific proposed use are compatible with the surrounding area, i +? Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property.. ' ' The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment. Pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement with Pinellas County, review by the Pinellas Planning Council will not be required for the plan amendment. The Community Development Board reviewed these applications at their public hearing meeting of October 17, 2000 recommended approval of all applications. ORDINANCE NO.6628-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LANTANA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET SOUTH OF UNION STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT.8, BLOCK D, BROOKLAWN SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2071 LANTANA AVENUE, TOGETHER WITH ABUTTING RIGHT OF WAY ON IANTANA AVENUE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached.hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the city. pursuant to Section 171,044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE'CITY COMMISSION OF.THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: Lot 8, Brooklawn Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 59, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with abutting right of way on Lantana Avenue. (ANX 00-09-13) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to Include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Si des i Assistant City Attorney Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No, 6626-00 -2 OWNER: imues H. Olson &: W. Potrscio C. ? Case: _ A&IY CO-09--!5 ADDRESS: 20/1 Lantono ; ,,enue PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: CI:??i ,vo}r r', rl ?l G'r7 dry..<la,vn Sub. 3 ok D ,-)t 8 [ LAND USE PLAN ZONING . , - FROM: Residential tlab«n PROPERTY SIZE ACRES::- Y 0.13 TO: a -____ - Right-of-way Size Acres: 0.074 ' ATLAS !'AGE: 211 SEC: TWP: RANGE: 1 -? ^ COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: CITY COMMISSION: Ordinance No. 6628-00 PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION F r? { ORDINANCE NO. 6629-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL. PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LANTANA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET SOUTH OF UNION STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT 8, BLOCK D, BROOKLAWN SUBDIVISION, TOGETHER WITH ABUTTING RIGHT OF WAY ON LANTANA STREET, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2071 LANTANA AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL URBAN PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and Is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Property Land Use Category Lot 8, Block D, Brooklawn Subdivision as recorded Residential Urban In Plat Book 13, Page 59, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with abutting right Of way on Lantana Street (ANX 00-09-13) . Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6628-00, and subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163,3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form* Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6629-00 .'tl???S ? •?t :'Vi. ?? ?.f?n i.l? ;,+i?ie'i ;?:s :t.: ,7 .Y :.??rf. •s's ?S ?"?77? WYf ?; may' vsr- s. r'.• .s"".r?_? ?..'' 7,3 Z4J .y `.t 1. 1 'IIeY :7`3='.'."c S?:'• :?"' '`'ty ..i .,.a'.' yq? •7J •r.:?,.. r .F••` '?c,•f.r..? "'.? t. :' ' ?'. r'??? f• , ,f - .If. ?.i' ??Sss:: Ltl. ?;,; •r ?? y;1.i'{J{I. •.?Y•tti;•.z..s' .rf?' .t,? Sr ]? :??' ':•.5. _- f,: °..e,'?ft;.. ?} "?•".'.(, •,i::i??? *: ?µ? lF , .. ,rl4 .l h .+..'<r E.: rw;^I'i i?•i.i;1Y." r wn. `•ry ,.... .;.. . .yy, r•?!?1ti a... t ?... }ti ? ..a ; f•. 1T '!,•y :?r .wl`-''°.`?E?T?' .f. ?i: ,?'•?C77, -ti ?. :3 '?M., .::r a? T?!?hU1 ?r .f. .`...:: ...j?.•f•`r•?WIQY{....-?•..T..«?,'L'-t-'?w•..?,.? '?J` :.,j•i?,.•?;?_ '?E.?s? E?-VEY ya. AD, 049 3 4 11115 z 10 ZQBQ T1WAR 109 CONDO +` ?.S 11,.7 ,•:..c.,^"s-_'"`f?i :11171 +Atl1{4Yf-''.' ` q ° '438-1.0 2 ?V a 5 d 6 z 7 9 I eo s s ors ` 10 , ? 3 4 4 ? ? 87.7 to 1 r 2 241 23 22 t, 21 20 71% 19 lS 16 1r 15 GARDENIA C 1,4 13 t3 / z 77T. I -F .7 jD o PINE KIN 1__ 4 2 133 , 200. $ -7 . rp? HIGHWAY Esml? 1 34 , 'CONDO s nose . 130 33 21157 89-10 y 129 w136 w M I 7 128 X137 ; s• 7- 0 . Calf 1 127 138 2035 "036 J ?QC. ?v 126 E C 7 E?1.Y 2 1?5 1.x.1 140 Q 3 10 12.1 ?? 4,)17 1 rid ?. s 1 . __ aee 123r. PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION ,r OWNER: JmaeS H. Olson ?r 'N. Pctricto C. ? Case: ?IBC 00- ?{3-1 r ADDRESS: :071 Lcntono PROPE=RTY DESCRIPTION - Ctaf:I ,:?kE r, rl Wr'c' Lot 8, :5Ior''. D, E?rcoklf %-t,) '7ur) LAND USE PLAN ZONING 9 FROM: ?e?uf?ni??,l EJr;1gn PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.13 -? TO: 1- i>tl' I1 El 'JS -ICA Right-of-way Size Acres: 0.074 ATLAS PAGE: '? 1E ' SEC: T'NP: RANGE: 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPME+NT BOARD: CITY COMMISSION: Ordi.nance NO. 6629--00 ORDINANCE NO. 6630-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. OF CLEARWATER, -FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LANTANA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET SOUTH OF UNION STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT 8, BLOCK D, BROOKLAWN SUBDIVISION, TOGETHER WITH ABUTTING RIGHT OF WAY ON LANTANA AVENUE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2071 LANTANA AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City Is amended, as follows: Property Zoning Distri ct Lot 8, Block D, Brooklawn Subdivision as recorded Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) In Plat Book 13, Page 59, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with abutting Right of way on Lantana Avenue (ANX 00-09-13) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6628-00. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: r 7 Ca4L('1- , "I Leslie K. Dougall-Sider Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6630-00 :ti..'c , :,y? '.' I••t: d? 'rip L?.c ?.. .tt,: ;tiJO R."'4?C}' +r _ j; :>'•,.3?:::.'s" :ti ..,ri t°t:? a,rfi;}: ?;s 1 }.1t.,:e-•..r%.Fl?.a s?: '??,'r'; it .'..°-."•f =l;ti ?-...,a-.^..-."jdi}'• ? t?..'i^. ::. .•?::.1: S.:ii ri:;?' CkY' ???''?` .f??.i1:?'? ri: '! r ?? ?t?M .`?- q ?y ,h. ..; ,r: 'w• ,J wS ''• %???II6D r' j?l?? ?~L ••+? x?' +, r``?' j .'rr• ':.: '??? '??.r ?°'? i:w? . ?:f'.i •;?.,?`?. ,r?. I `ct'l?:e nn. ,?!' yA? ? ?7-''? '? n X,r l?...t;? ??.. :.?•• :'??'. 't''i• ' »?:.: i?.: . ..J;',. w.1i'%'?r•Ay? ?.?{+? .rs?! . 1"r?!'s ' .?' ?tl ". : '.;?.:'• ,i;., 3.?;? ? r..l.•.t,.::`:µti ice;; 7077 J` ?.r?.r> ?? i„ iii ,' `•? .'i , '.'isl. % zor > ?• .k'. 2 3 5 6 7 U 9 i?,t??} 50 j[2 1Q 30 t >? F34 ?0r 1?J / zosa II 1, i DWAR ?: ? {-?` 9 CONDO ?os'.r' I 0 6 ,00 PINE ?. R r' :r a KIN 133 CO HIGHWAY 3- 1 134 °?' t i5r• "s,- f'' XONDO. 130 zosr! a 2 N 13? ' O wC r FV` -;y r 89 -102 2057 7 Case 29 r4 Z 0136 r.a?tlK v« •r ;^? } a 7 128 "'113 I 1_ 50 c w 127 1 38 ? (n ;:035 2135 l m ` C7 iy :ti' a '1 nly.l y`i?'c 3 s =` 4( 2 2» 23 22 21 ?0 19 1 » ? ? Z 1 ??? I _ , ` 15 b I /GARDENIA CT 5 6 ! 13 IZ02 / 7t I - I._ . voc. R/'.v z 126 W 1 rY?p? U) ??? 'f 125 f aae liJ 4 { lap I 10 3 T 12 _ 2017 j- ?_,?? Case C?'3 123 MEN = PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION 2 OWNER: Jmas:s H. Olson Patricia C LCase: 411`1',{ 00--09-i3 ADDRESS: "'Q71 Ufontonr.:i Avenu D[?SCRIPTiON_ I PROPER7Y T '- LAND U5E_PLAN ZONING fR0M: Resdenkl Urreco 2_1 PROPERT'l SIZE ACRES: 0.13 TO: - Right-of-way Size Acres: 0.074 ATLAS PAGE: SEC; TINP: RANGE: ' H ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: ,,-ca?.r f,. C ) CITY COMMISSION: Ordinance No. 6630-'00 CDB Meeting Date October 17, 2000 Case No. ANX 00-09-13 Agenda Item: C. 5. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER(S): Jmaes H. Olson & W. Patricia C. Olson APPLICANT: City of Clearwater (Pursuant to Agreement to Annex dated June 3, 1985) LOCATION: 2071 Lantana Avenue, on the east side of Lantana Avenue, approximately 230 feet south of Union Street. REQUEST: To annex the property into the City of Clearwater in accordance with the provisions of approved Agreement to Annex and approve the appropriate City land use plan category and zoning district. SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 5,600 square feet or 0.13 acres . Dimensions of property: Lot width of 56 feet by 100 feet deep PROPERTY USE Current Use: Single family residential Proposed Use: Single family residential PLAN CATEGORY Current County Plan Category; Residential Urban Proposed City Plan Category: Residential Urban ZONING DISTRICT Current County Zoning District: Residential, One Two and Three Family District (R-4) Proposed City Zoning District: LMDR BACKGROUND INFORMATION : On June 3, 1985, the previous owner of this property entered into an Agreement to Annex (ATA) the subject property with the City of Clearwater in order to connect to the f CD13 ANX 00-09-13 October 17, 2000 Page 2 City-sewer and water facilities. At that time, the subject property was located outside the municipal boundaries of the City of Clearwater and did not meet the adjacency requirements'for a voluntary annexation. The terms and provisions of that agreement are binding upon the previous owners, their successors, assigns, or-any subsequent owner of this property. It was agreed that at such time as it would become possible for the City to annex the property, that the ATA would constitute an application to annex at that time. The subject property is now contiguous to the existing city boundaries to the north and east of this property, The City was also required to give the property owner 60 days written notice of its intent to annex this property. This requirement has been met and a notice letter was sent to the current property owner on June 28, 2000. The notice expired on August 29, 2000. Moreover, the agreement provided that the owner of the property at the time it was to be officially annexed, will pay the City of Clearwater a one time payment of four hundred dollars ($400.00). The fee is the property's fair share of its impact on open space and,the funds'are earmarked, for the maintenance of an acceptable level of open space required to promote the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Clearwater. The open space fee is based on the City's Recreation and Open Space impact fee ordinance originally adopted on July 7, 1983. The current owners of the property are Jmaes H. Olson and W. Patricia C. Olson. ANALYSIS The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request in order to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and conditions established in the ATA agreement of June 3, 1985. The subject property is now contiguous with the existing City boundaries and it is consistent with the Florida statutes with regard to the requirements for voluntary annexation. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Urban and it is proposed to be zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). The subject property is an existing single family residential home. 1. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES Water and Sewer The City of Clearwater has been providing water service to the subject property since June 3, 1985, and capacity for the project continues to be available for this utility. Therefore, this annexation will not have any effect on public facilities. In addition, the City's ability to serve the overall site had previously been documented through the previous ATA annexation agreement. Moreover, the previous owner had paid the required assessment fee applicable at that time. 3 CDB ANx 00-09-13 October 17, 2000 Page 3 Solid Waste Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's Resource Recovery Plant and capacity is available to serve the property. Police: The property is located within the West Police District and service will be administered through the District 2 Station located at 645 Pierce Street. Community policing service will be provided through the City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect police service and response time. Fire-and-Emergency Medical Services Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to the property by Station #45 located at 610 Pierce Street. The Fire Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time. In summary, the proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public facilities and their level of service. 11. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan designate the site as Residential Urban whose intent is to recognize an urban area as primarily well suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities and natural resources of such area. Residential uses are the primary uses in this plan category up to a maximum of 7.5 dwelling units per acre. Other permissible uses in the Residential Urban plan category include Public/Semi-Public uses, schools, ancillary non-residential and Recreation/ Open Space uses. The annexation does not propose to change the Residential Urban plan category and the proposed use is consistent with the uses and density of this plan category. Further, the r r CDB ANX 00-09-13 October 17, 2000 Page 4 annexation promotes infll development as stated in Objective 2.4 of the Future Land Use Plan: 2.4 Objective - In considering extension of service and facilities, Clearwater shall actively encourage Infill development. In summary, the.proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan both in the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies of the Plan. IIL CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS The appropriate zoning district under the new Community Development Code is the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District whose dimensional requirements are consistent with the surrounding development on this site. The application for annexation covers an existing detached dwelling unit. Detached dwelling units are required to have a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet in the LMDR zoning district. The subject property has a lot size of 5,600 square feet which exceeds the minimum lot size requirement of the LMDR zoning district. In addition, a review of the dimensions of the subject property with a width of 56 feet and a depth of 100 feet indicates that the site meets the dimensional requirements of the LMDR district as a standard development. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN There is no change requested in the Comprehensive Plan category of the site that will remain Residential Urban with a maximum density of 7.5 units per acre. According to Special Act 88-464 which established the Pinellas Planning Council, annexations of less than 10 acres do not require the review of the Council nor of the Countywide Planning Authority. Therefore, due to the small size of this property, review by the Pinellas Planning Council is not required. There are no other Countywide Plan policies applicable to this application. V. CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA LAW Florida Statutes require that a proposed annexation be both contiguous with the existing municipal boundaries and compact in its concentration (Florida Statutes Chapter 17 1). This property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the south of the property and represents a logical extension of the existing boundaries. The compact standard of Florida law requires that the annexation does not create an enclave or a serpentine pattern CDB ANX 00-09-13 October 17, 2000 Page 5 of municipal boundaries. The annexation of this property is consistent with this standard and.no new enclave will be created by annexation of this property. In summary, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law. Vi. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS The response from the Community Response Team (CRT) indicates that there is a six foot high fence immediately adjacent to undeveloped Arbelia Street right-of-way; no paved driveway/parking, and outdoor storage of washer, table and buckets at the site. The Community Response Team will work with the property owner to bring the property into compliance with City Community Development Code following the annexation. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request in order to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and conditions established in the ATA agreement of June 3, 1985. The City has been providing water service to the subject property since June 3, 1985, and capacity continues to be available for this utility. Therefore the proposed annexation of this property will not affect the provision of public facilities. The proposed annexation and the existing use are consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. The existing and future use of this site as a single family residential is consistent with the LMDR zoning district. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. Tile payment of $400.00 is due to the City on November 1, 2000 prior to the adoption of the associated ordinances on December 7, 2000 by the City Commission. Based oil the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the request: 1. Recommend APPROVAL of the annexation of the property located at 2071 Lantana Avenue. 2. Recommend APPROVAL of the Residential Urban plan category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Recommend APPROVAL of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. "•'!,s{if. i'?9?.``?'. +?.`1•?????'l.e' 1. .y^ ? " , . ? I ? . l r . I ? ? 'j', ? ' l j , !'•'' it ' • ? i ' 1 z+? Y ? ?- ? 1?• _ , ? ' f r:?;??'',>~..k:?i': ?''.r°4Arlkh', .a??A?iS;:'i'.?c?°1F?,. ' • ._ 1 ?..'r.?.i? ,:Q?i°.i W.?•:?a,.4,s?w rn,^,1;?a.•1•, ,.... ? ., ,. •...?.•r,,,•. .. . _ ,. •u r. . . , .. ..?r _.. ... . , ?- . CDB ANX 00-04-13 '. .. October 17, 2000 i ` :. " . Page b .. ,• Senior Planner Prepared by:, Etim S. Udoh , Attachments Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map f. Land Use Map . Surrounding Uscs Map Zoning Atlas && Utilities Maps ' i y ' Clearwater City Commission Worksession Item Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item ,# Meetin9 Date: SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: ? -S Wi6-oo Land Use Plan amendment and Rezoning for property at 3070 Chesapeake Lane (MB 22101); Owner: First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc. MOTION: APPROVE a Land Use Plan Amendment from Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) to Institutional (INS), and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) to Institutional (1) Zoning District for the property located at 3070 Chesapeake Lane (Mete and Bound 22-01 in Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East) and PASS ordinances 6614-00 and 6615- 00 (LUZ 00-08-11) on first reading. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The site is located at 3070 Chesapeake Lane on the west side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 450 feet south of Drew Street. The site is approximately 4.9 acres in size and is used as active park with a baseball field. The purpose of the land use plan amendment and rezoning is to allow the construction of related Church activities and its accessory facilities at the site. This parcel will be added to the larger 11.8 acres tract to the north also owned by the church. A separate land use plan amendment and rezoning has been approved by the City and is pending Pinellas Planning Council review on November 15, 2000. The property will continue to be served by the City of Clearwater water and sanitary sewer service. The Planning Department determined that the proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning applications are consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: • The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning application are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • The potential range of uses and the specific proposed use are compatible with the surrounding area. • Sufficient public facilities are available to serve to serve the property. • The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment. Please refer to the attached report for the complete staff analysis. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to the Reviewed by: Origfnating Dept.: Costs Legal Info Svc NIA PLANNING DI3? Total ! rlM S UDO Budget NIA Public Works NIA User Dept.: Funding Source: Purchasing NIA DCMIACM Planning Current FY ci Fask Mgmt NIA Other Attachments ORDINANCES OP NO. 6614-00 & 6615-00 STAFF REPORT Other submitted by: 4 I Appropriation Code: City Manamr ro'41-W 0 "O? CJ None - - - Pdro s nn rC.-*04 l rww .SY:1 'f'r :i . r }wsi;F?. .yySe .I+, r•..` 1 •;; r • .. } .s I 1 ` ?.. ' ' ' ' ' ' ! ?• . ? . ? ? ? 1 tji r yy ,r°'?t+. :?. yy :????.1 `:` if? :. 1•`r?.',?i •4•.`r?.?•. .? .?.: '.:. ..°?. '. , ,I ,, r? ,. i .. ..?, { ft,1}`?r? '+T` I.. !.ili .??ak.`?,.?'i?1',•??`1..'?t.>.?i.'-....i.',. .. ..,.z..n. a r«rba•.'"ik x+.. ..r?:;•t:?t•. :,,. ... .. ?, r - .,r ? ? ?. ? .,. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CLEAR.WATER, INC.t i CC LUZ 00-08-11 i Page 2 approval of the Pinellas Planning Council and the Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Due to the size and/or intensity of the plan amendment site, review ; and approval by Florida Department of Community Affairs is not required. The Community Development Board reviewed these applications at their public hearing of October T 2000 and recommended approval of all two applications. i ORDINANCE NO. 6614-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE' PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET SOUTH- OF, DREW STREET, CONSISTING OF M&B 22121, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 3070 CHESAPEAKE LANE , FROM OPEN SPACE/RECREATION TO INSTITUTIONAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, ' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property as follows: Property Land Use Category See attached Exhibit "A" From: Open Space/Recreation (LUZ 00-08-11) To: Institutional Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject-to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163.3189, Florida Statutes. The Administrator of Planning and Development Services is authorized to transmit to the Pinellas County Planning Council an application to amend the Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended by this ordinance. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-Sid s Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 6614-00 '3? s. ?•s' 1. +. .1 -.5 ..I if. ?F''f?' ? I??V ' •. 1 . ` 1 •• 1 . vi 'p?.'3.?i'a•pr•`?,T1?'??'p?L,.E,y,j ,•Sn?..?,Fj??l• .w n.,..11?...r .1.. a '.... .? 1•.E iA' ;;... EXHIBIT "A" + ' ' CHESAPEAKE PARK PROPERTY Begin at the SE corner of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 Section 16; Township 29 South,' Range'16 East,. and sun thence M 0°3T03" E, along the 40-acre line, 730.35 feet for P.O. , thence continue. N 0°37'03" E. 95.0 feet, thence N ` .89027'56" W, 669.05 feet; thence S. 0°37'03" W, - 495.21 .feet; thence S 89°27'56" E; ''469.05 'feet; thence N 0°37'03" E. '400.21 feet; thence S 89°27'56'.' E; 200.0 feet to a P.O.B., less the East 33.0 feet for road right-of- way '1 1' eI, R', ,,4 .'}y,'.r:'i;•=;'fi 9..}?'.. `,,;? ,:?:':i.?'..?-.??;??J?'.. I STREET Il+• 'ftr.':'ya;:+• f?L.. ?.f: .i,;r..,(.Yr,. .. .,{ .? ` ,lr.'• .,?,,;i f?i?,jl::' •1"• :titi...,l. •i ", {+r '7.%''' .;fl 5 + '111; .?r 'r yi'1•''F'L •%a.•? • .}7 aTR , ' r.'.?i?, !„ %.: '.'ti . t».at r.F4' ,•ly. s:'" ' f:? b =7 a! '•? + !w,"7 ?1 n' .Ya 1.? ?? ; j,• !+. .I- _`F? .,r.l. `Ztiti?:•.. ? °•" i,+ r. •. .+,? .i.,, °' f.'r .ti,, +... ?"'F .: 1 1 ? .1. t? f 'i .t+s: . {t:R3 ?.?- ?, ?;? , .1,,;• ?.?'' r %•'.•;f•? ?. ,r :pi?,t?:. •.4' ?t'?1•• : `y,7c?: =`.?a':•?t? I?Qy ;{ ?'? r i;? '?; I S':j4 ? , .r;1: ???q .5,' '? C„ , • •. .r,.:. ,.., r. Vii' :... ' . ?,. :' - !• ',l•r:. : !• ?k`r }7 '7}t e.wf7?•+r:j 5:.'" .I,yll,? r ti!: •: r•/,:."'•; illy. '.f ??••'?.a [ryy 1t+ i; '.i }/? f.r 'r . i.'{ .c ,+r•.5 a.• I': •'• n•'• ,?, 'Lr t 5}r?, it ,I+.•1? i ? k', •? ,?? ..f;r 7 •lff'yl.LrR F '4{r .7.r 4`!L? ? 'r7 r, :, /'.! r 4r !''. ?X.•F}i: C.,t?•F. ;r , ...,.• F• .?,3 7nY ISeY ai fn.. ?::: .F 5'. .. %vl.• '•r. N•f.,,1. r..:r :• ':};: +t./t:?.T'; 1- t1Y?:. •. '•:?'. .1. i•.4'e. ?• ' _ ?? .? .r y ? _4 ? ?ar;. ? .' .. .a'" Y: z.r !{ 4'•,ta+•?l?..• •a, ,.., 1, ?f :/'• •L. .f !i • i mar/' ., w "ri ?•«- , 7?j{i! ^ •,c',: t'! • t.:•• •i' i •?' .•r 'n ."+ r' 'S' 't',. 4'?? ?. •rJ ,_• •:1 .fib •r ?' i::. •.L_. . y!. F•'?;. %, ?i..l ? F,.jL. 1 fl. + r .r. ', ??1 !i:.:. '1?7.' •??' a4.,r _3 r. f?' .?:ti,?i: 1, Jr '- 't t'??1`•,r?r,• t+i, art''}{i!?:• •,'•".• '+5 .1'::.. 'i?: ?.<::•w'3?i ',{i 't';:?r d ': :,'_? Et 1 ?.: :15'3' i•.3..:Y?;;•rs:3 ?:?i: 1..1~+?,t?•' ;rfr?s,. 1?•3f?.'. ?.`': •?r!`•'•Jw +Ls., i{. .? 1^ .r`• ra,r: 'f. 23 ?.•? a f•,°r?•, +tr .. t•.;i': ._r :,, e a}JCf f' fr ?•?";. .i' ..' t'L.%; ?} 1143 7NOT A r,r,' ?.? s>r i •tS•'` t'f?.5,:{,.?.•i.1??•; :1s•'_,. `:; :+,., :,}:":.fei,:.•. •;', ?1C?.'};rsy.,A '+. .r :S.:S:.,Ti:?1 :r, PETHEltWbpD •? SGi1T,i1'i? t:i?? ;tai .' , ,?. .., IFt• ... :I r ? . +, ? r ? • n 7 ti - 1. ^ti:. i'}• ? 4,'a ? ?` .ii'• r lrlt•;:;,' tea: .•,. _?.r¢• ' ?'r rr-' •': [ . - I ? r? I? ?' s a• '•i3. '?1, :r: :•x?. '!,`• -:?• =? 1/ ,'?' Mz .?i%;.:,, •'1 :.:?• ?'t:. :.!« .t; ? L' - I_ ., -?.(/1 1 .J`r•'1• ,t7?r. '+. ~': '.r .x:.t 1, •r' - - •.17rr1?! '!•'li,'/)'t»..•. ? I;y I? ??rri ?J ,1•.••!,;':...'.; ;?•. i?-'. •'+l ai??s??ln(`f?•'7MIi-s.y ,w, ?i.•r ^tLrfhti?'1 :','??••??^;',.. r.d Crt.M+rr• . ??? v ut W !•I W •:t[?..rrw ?-+w•.?-r-77-:T F'Y I'.r MATNfJi'M000 COl1FiTY 0 ^': •!? •-' '-r'? CHES A.PE.# ''_a 2: 122 Q CHESAPEAKE ,?.....' :,': t?^ [n r1 ?5 1, Sd fa 12 [; tt?•J CHESA?Er4EE STPE>=t .p1 N PARK ?r?„:';T; 11Q5-28 r!?? ? .r, •? rr .a .?. ?:'Iw'T ?^'?-', ?x.?« ///?i a •+?•7, ? ? ?. FY4 ?,o .:r', •?-'?•'S •,? :[1+77 r ViI..LAS 70--42 T) j s: fl 1- 4 y It 1`1yi¦ ' //r S fA41 `yL I 11Ii[T 7.7 L L:-v?;'R,'.J • w!C: _ . n n J? n ]5 ../fv !?, r_1 In ?:? {`a Y ??-r a •+ -. .I.r;,.l???? N? sr to"„r,a,{?:.ls= fi` ? ? r?ffl2 •t]IIrS $ 7 t}? :•i l:>.r.:. /.. wrv. •'?:, W?'?V ?i•!., ?.= fr7 `I' ?7? r x l ? ... rY•. !? 7r n?,w•, ?1 W I ? „ v jrvr•r H ]? x? y'?[.r??`.,.;r,.M?;a' _ _ - r 1 la O ??H rile ~ :, .j.,y?r•}}•1;,,;?.ggg. ? - : 0 1? f?•y !1'! 73 r„??:it^:iS •t ±i?? t.' ?t-tr3?ti ? ? •1• b ''? r ,? /.1? ` .2/1 S n 7, .?. Iti +'i'i?'? .?1 j''s.•?rTA?OO' sr? r}Lr ?;i?.?•.}?FLf:i ^ `n .. 4 .• w n y !r 1-3 4s ? «I . ?L? nJ ry I ~ ? '• : 1. 1J •.2+'x,{ ? •t:,.2?. ?9{ ?,...I_ ? x ? a 'p,r ;:!?t /f7 a.r., ik' Y7 w•»-r rt'+ J n n n? r? - - R. ^02 ? " _ %F`= {,?.:. ry ? ? ? ? ? .. ? w . ?i?rij ?w f?'j,, .•r:''fi•• Ig iI ! i ? i tf I r.? ° • ° I.t2Z `:v. 1 ?ry-4{?. r}i 'L,''' }- ,i; nt.s r' =;i. lcLl : - .t t' JI TOWNHOU5 Ea 1l9-33 j !8 EON ^ 4bi S , r?'!4yl ^? .wY ' ~ r .spr•^eceYt: att7ii.. iW4 r? • ?e '}L' r!5v t '.•tlyf: 1 IS t;2, .721/fa^ ) _ ILI. •w .:. ?' .}ti`•••... i ..t•`.'n ."..?2•h .; arJ ?i''?:t k?i?•r. i,•.i"{tt nSiti t" rti?'r. ; ©,=.i -1« rv r1 ;i y}*3'+?' .:/+i t fe'. glNr rjl; : ? jr14 11?:'K-1 j1} ?V v i PARNWAY 22/1t` ?I.J7/t71 f ?a°il? Lv! >' :?l.jir 7,•r A IA - ./ ?u Rr t ..Y 1J 4 Lt ?3;?Z y Frl? , .? fr 11r @' =n,%?t x,w ti n i' ?!a'y:?Jy, r k P:3??'15"• its f''+9'??' e 1 v?J'%?"b w n o n ? t,'}tF,•;,-?.r{ 4f~t ,, n ,- . T??• f r2'LM, •!' •?`° A? t '.?'•? :+;r?Lt;' a` AJ.r"rr'kr"{* ' ?;7;•,r ['5 fi ras_/ "'1jCiG ! ?• ?R':?. 1{1tT ? ?y,.yazf'•tF a5 ?'e 'Cr?•' . i... 1 f J.`+!I 7 i?,_;.•`?"? 7"4 7 ic" s 1YA fill . 'roi; 2 ,t :rd( ?? Y. ? , y. ?. ??• tt ri J? i ir• i.y.l},?, .rl;r^r Ir ,;••_, QH S t ? } ;tea q ? 5 4 t ? 4J' s 1F?..T'• ???{Ft:•? P7•; ? .'l?l.r?:''1• }rT?a, r.?}, ig14.,T?{ `/ , s ?! J t+?J na lir ?'J I. ' A' 'fLr? c,jtj;''''w?ii 4iy';l''F;! ?'it?•7.7.? ° //?1 ,? a ra ..+ ,•+ .a ff -???•:`?? .? Zsrc'°;y`tr ? F."••tJ.?, 1 10 9 a u T' •x; X??'?L,aS41.'? i ?1? ?t f'=i a o f°?`?H1L`?S1A \ ,- 12 t 1 + y • lsr -5?{?: . r':V,' ? :,;,??s .?: tY_:,.,?,rin: ?J"- kfr l= I ~ µ :3 1 I 0 ClE 7 w r •1 C'lri•Syrar=' ?ti' ++.•x 4•-•.i i?;,L ?„r: n• 1 f `'I\"\_?a¦ 7 ,\'3'\ \? \1 .J J\ :?, wi •?'1 i +. tR?.J,;.{;1?3' ?y /'. ?f`!T? ?? 7.r Ct,..i ?,.•.l r,.C"?„ J? 4 ftl C7 ,s 1 ? /l .•A .a ria J N B" ; •rt .k• `{ '^` •h hri P` f?'•x + •5 v... i aaC'-- •t ryr+'i!?'M:?+yli. .' T1 - ??r + tnP. 1' ?.... , .t f S"ail'?r.•?... r'Jl:.:L rilF . {: .. L ?j i .j,...Cy,1? '? v r WN KN?TT?GYi't`L?P ,..tar " '+ .', +CrxnITY °s : MDR 7a AVENUE + , h 9 i sr 6 xi 7•."- ti i ? ? , CL tt b?-t: ?`7 ?' X5.4 5 ^7 ER: 'I Z 9:. 69 3 c 7 t} 7 ! i li" t'x:l•':.'.' i1i /,s;.' .,i++Fn,. } 1 3? f? :5 L f• c S 1 } 1) S TL $, AWEW :a? =! .?'. + ?? . -. t7a ifric,::::.:.y•, ? rr.:Y.:. L " ', -. _ n ?w x--- y J i•;, e' }. i ^'x' ? •''.'? t?.?T: =i:??f Ci ?i •. •", p? "'l ;nom . H : yry 40. 10 [s t•A.7U LT =' :a TERRACE :c';? •ri n l: =} c!r :sr I :uNr.•[e I I I i r T y , 7. - TRADE- WFNDS ? NEa?S#?..' +:. .i_'.,?.1- ',?,` ;.' ..?,..•? 's,... . ? i,, 'A44?ZUE " as + ?a. ! L +0 n I? .+.. I I y'? ; ?? ,? ??. ..r'•':.?' i'ti •?? r. -? -+,• ? •" IA rCO I I _J I I _ I ? ` _ 1 i •L.1 '{ a1 r. '? d:i' Y.: •?6' :J7 :ff l7t' / -' w I I.'• ?.> }'?i ,tlw ,JI'• . J "+ r i "?' - r i I r i 4 I I ! 4_ PROPOSED REZONING AND LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT OWNER: First Baptist Church of 'Clearwater CASE LUZ 00-08-11 SITE: 3070 Chesapeake lane PROPERTY . SIZE (ACRES): 4,9 ? - -?-?---~M r•ZONING ?------?- -? -?--LAND' USE .___.. _ . PIN' 18I29l16lOt?004/220l2100 FROM: OS/R Recreation/ Open Space TO: I Institutional ATLAS 292A PAGE: Ord iivince 110, 6614-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6615-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED M&B 22121 OF, CONSISTING OF THE WEST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET SOUTH OF DREW STREET, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 3070 CHESAPEAKE LANE, FROM OPEN SPACE/RECREATION (OSIR)TO INSTITUTIONAL (1); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows: ct Proppift Zoning Distri See attached Exhibit "A" From: Open Space/Recreation (OSIR) (LUZ 00-08-11) To: Institutional (1) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the approval of the land use designation set forth in Ordinance 6615-00 by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Govemment Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to §163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: . t Leslie K. Dougall-Srde Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 6615-00 I r E =I r > t r v 2 i r , , , y.. , P{?. /, a{p ?rp??Tii?l??'x°.i?+et$pt ,y 4' • .f' . ,_ ' 1. ,. . <.. ., .. S: e} „ . 1 :.. . , ' , .'t• r .. , ... .' . . ...af 'a7:%S.C+. x.1..,3 a. ..14•,. ? PM?i,ri,? . .. : it . •? . EXHIBIT "A" CHESAPEAKE PARK'PROPERTY i Begin•at the SE corner of the NW 1/4 of the NW 114 Section 18, Township 29 ' South, Range 16 East, and run thence N 0°37'03" E, along the 40-acre'line, 730.35 feet for P.Q.B., thence continue N 0°37'03 E. 95.0 feet, thence N .. 89°27'56" W, 669.05 feet;' thence S 0°37'03" W, 495.21 feet; thence S 89°27'56" E, 469.05 feet; thence N 0°37'03" E, 400.21 feet; thence S . 89°27'56" E. 200.0 feet to a P.O.B., less the East 33.0 feet for road right-cf- way 1 •.Z . ^+S DREYr<?i.„ .,> i :'? Y4Z,- 97S'., } ?. :J,.:, r :•f;t: J'ii6•.,:,r? : t?.•}.''),. - r:...• .} ., s.,r ?``y '+Z-? r .?'{' .11 ' 1 IT" •if; ,s'?',1'. ,' ti•???'+ri r .r" ••t••,.:' '' 'r - * r,'rsII',• r 1?a_a '. .4. J'.r .S ,STREET _•;L; ; r;'' ?, •,:L' 1`r.. ?.:??: { •+ • a ^ •,, ' "L ??• ??,,, ,li t J".' k y.,,,,,,'r.'' •r: f. . LY, „ r 'i; ?, r 'n? i;:,,?'f- 'r.:.'•'L .n a,. .•f' 4' l1 `•Y •S?'%a' ,.1" a?'ti ?.f `.? "?F}. %}. •- ?:} •r, r;- ''C v. ?% .',r.. rS ,e. %w ?.. •1 T+t;,. %.} L.. ,... , C : ?, ti? L ? ? ? P j. +.r-.;:.:i:• i. .itfr:. :1.,... 1;"JJt t': .-..•:.?t;. i}?r'!: i.S: ti• ?...r.,?i•Lr..rr?.-, ?:'?M !" ! f 1 ? ir•, ?'v.. 'r•?.L: "'!.r.'v '?, i??.(' ..ri. :rrt~'?T:i '. :•y ?. YJ?t f:.:: T,r(rle ??.; i•.f :1= ?? •+ P?• 1[ ri?S ti?.syl "%w r1^?• •, S, ??•. a rL. :•}:','Y,.' ? vi••r':C'i '.'i ='i=i'.? .,,.;;. w?, .r?.+.. rSr..' .. ,y_. ° i Y ?. 1 ' Vii, . 4`' . , ;,. ?' ,ti `, ?, : • ,:r..?'ti' , ?: -''; - ':,.,' ''•i'c ',!t .:CR T J; `:' ?` 'r?` f r'f`? "?'? '?+t4.: ='f, :"iL=' C-";" :?! "::'..?; . 1? .}'?''.'F.,? ?} • ,, ? L.. ,R:'?.,•f... r ?`?i 1r. •. '-rt.'??:'... ?r.:r,C '1•.>. .v., .». .; ?-:?.. ,°. •'r '?z••.r tlAY: ,..• N',+y.•,n .r„ ?• wf?•? ,:;? ?.i' iT,;?. +..':1 Yir .T. _'r.. -}`'. `;; +;f ^!r, S'ir' ?..r???'' .i: _4 Js I d._•r`i• rk. :f:':a• .? ,J-_?•f1..,;. ;t ;'• ;?,? :'t=: ??,``.? .,>,c" ?i ?•;'.;:, ••?,?r' ;,?• ,? •: ? ?.., t• ??,:,?i w a?:' .S;,,a._ =o'. : tC. kit.: t • ?i-.{.iK • :' •?? ? i:a ' . ;. ' .? ?:.:r? ;i.. .. ctrl :!.:` ;''? ; ::^(r? W, tii, }tl,c:2?.?Ql;:a n r'' •w? 7 •rt. _? 'ti l=ir 'l'n ?...} ?..?.' : i ,:+'i:f?• 'k?i'.f .T'' •Ci v% ',ig.•2:rrnP,+ .<i•r .7f.'1•rf, »3:'.-•, .:, ?,t':+r...'?r': r t•, ' J ?j :. r7' .S't 1 1: :! :?? •.,r.F1. ?r?r ii {1 {•:YJ• '•i ••? _ ?J 1'?'i!••' ""??•-r'LS :1.:j?: }*i?. i. ;:' .;aS' S. .?,? .? ?, LI .?' ,r. ','•,, ••i1. .}t '. `Sti .a ..7r1 ?Lfa.• °+•. F•? ';i°i ;.?Mr; ''.a'.,.r?. r•??'.h• .5 '•'..>]?'?175... ,r•? r.; ," 1J `.~ r. 'r?`?: f•, `.}_ .? .:S' •:rt_1 ,r.. s•... a.??. l...'.:? _r, a:/: f'. r •t •,rv i. s?r•. 'f. l? ].: N ?•;r .,. `:+?'? ai;w=':•',I:`• r'e:.•!7L,_ f,» ,1j','? rY?7•ti ::^;.:./7.: .,ij "tr'rea:(.•;• t ??.r /... •t. ! '' '?',:w ? ?=,»? : ., ' . ti?' • z',:' '• .•t .; ''-'•r i F'EAr?.l?F?IZWO i _.`l=. .... ;ix; c :. -.?.i. •, .: ti S: Y. .r: S., .?' „ ?'r"•"'y? t _L r+ :3-: f.t r..kJ.• :li 1 ` - ! C7 + S I?? 7 •. i Lh" ?. . '' .? l?J. . ,.'VrX• •rt-. ^ : 'r'- Ir. ,, • 1: + ?'I,. I J I N ?.-` 1 t i4?, 1r .5: fr.• JTUV_ .l',' !',. •'r•; '•„w }Ifs`'.,,, ?'.'`.. ;4 - ry ti ; N= •'1 .', f.1 j//! 26 ? If ,17•x` r•i? ..'tit w:.?..._ ri:.'.:r'?:: ~'}? ~•••.a: ,lyd' ,?_1;• ?ire 1 i Iti _ ?--^?" \`Irk •, ,:?:':_•.:=•r"•.-.s'•, ,:..•??GS~r•"•ud't-r'a.os.r• •:?->a+?-L«i*+i?`. a,, 'f. .f w,h C.erouui' •', rrr COURT y? ?•1y? ri..s: I+;t '+',' T1+f3iwOC0 ;5 ?./ CHESAPEAKE FLA ;.ry^.??..? ,?lj C1 1 ,,• } ! ? {??•. 1 R W ? + t `r°S i may` I ? ? •? ? •". S? . d? X •e ? vP, .b ?+"i? v-.y '+--.•..? I? ?' • ?. n ? ? I ? la •' y \ ••7•t-. "'til.,, y,:. 1 a? a 2 CHESAPEAKE ^-'.= , +n r PARK r??' I I 105-28 . 1 HEESAPEASE STREET 2 t"'? t' ;_r n J? u 1 ? .^fZ.t. u.i t „ VILLAS S 70 1 JC--4 ry? €? :/:I n i r_r ? {:•r?r'y 1st??7.i.ue •i ? r0 q IO o? a I f Inn ` rt^J JY::?T ? i ?r f 'r ?1 ? ..?Y"iy? •1. ? 7 Z./11 ,`S;;f ••.1?= TR f o O ?O o }y.• _ Vii' Y '.r Tr ~ ~ .e T.4 (R q { 5 6 8 :...? r? lr - ^ 2'63 m n : . '" •. "' x'S++.i ??,r! I77 u' t, rsj Y'•f`.'i,•s`?; - .. a L OJA i ;a 1 y?Qj, fem., t. m 5 n n ^ - ti J+r, ?%,I 22/13 •? r't w ,?, 'n ,?. n?': U??s^.,?•"( ,,{?,F:•i29: $; .i n ?' ^ r, fp F? j '_'. !>? .+' 7:177 7 )7 ni K .ltik r r, A _ ~ rr}`.•7.? r•' iAe1_ ,;. i,-• ?. "tag :x? a aS?F c;*kttz, r j 1 1 1 7 1 I 1 7r rn. k Y. ° .'.I,~-,• _ - ,^2' S o (3 td .,rv 1; $:i'sirn+' i i. -?.. i!:ltn?r 9 6 1 2 O ?{ SE5 119-33 4 0 0• -'I - • ?'??' „1t a? ;2/f a 3 ° I •'•i Ct -• ?i??.I; •r"r:? [ ?? .A. h ?v r ?: , a-., ?Z isT,Y,?:A ?'"• !TL ` - - - AI `21/14I;- ' Irr' -?. .T. . •};?? ti,.._?.'..?' r+3'd7•" .J n'fiiC F3S..•t;t ° 1l. y?,y', •!T.. n f"_{? 1.4 -7 ^ :: ,y ,R ?•G•' g !_2, ' rt'r-,. pr. a TFJ - ' ., t Jr =---L. ?y fir. r) l Z2/r(y s;r? ?? e?r-ri?ef `?ifti 'i~ ?,. f•?' PARKWAY A IA U a??frr L` ?7 t.:. y; wt T?; ?5+ 4? .°tieeT ! o •. A+ ^71 ' ti _ ^ 1 r c` 1 'tf` $ -? • : P.?7:..>3, n :?','.:' ?.. ' ti' N •r f ^r, t .lti"t!:F ??,?r;'•4??T[?r 't r 4ti?ti ?f r't(,1?'? 1., rr'?'I___ 1 rT ? 7'I g 4 J'.f?! !? ray-Y ?•,` •?,I'•iT' -'bid..F:j1 2 •,,+•+'=?t.:?.:V"G;s„zf._1 r?'(i`:'{rr'}.tiZ`trI•'?`yf ?rr,?,t?. 645 i rn?= iR •^, ?•'Ci `j:? - ''I t, r ?V.« 'Jr??a i•N?: ?If:.F? .??•?'-?r .;r+tL z' 't ? F.r "' '{? 1' ?j :l';J IY?[ 1:' `?',R", KH S 101i f 2 ) • 5V 6 1 Z cT sI?' ' •!r';{•.,sti'a ..uwG:nk?,:'1-?".i'r.W`-w' ??• L';yp? r• 3 ( 'J FOR ;TI'y? I','?i??i `?? I -.a : •ct.a.,'ifr 'i''?ti,?r .tyY.?4 ?.+Nirl r '`J 10 7 d [ 13 L'',04" ?: ti , r as `?a Hlt.l.?{?? •? _ ?= +t !0 r7 « f? I Ef Lt1;"J? rJ5^r„`Y'+L•r:,"?tt'''i•a?i r?f;? \ B 7 (Lr1y•?L{R t1 i?: ?}taw ?'4?t a'jy _? d C 7 O 17? ?i i r ,r N . LS te>tll %T I .'I- ,?? -.i'N. .1 i'F•I y1,.r1? a'!'1'AiF:rn ?::{•i ?•- ?\`r\' \. ?1Mhht[R,r\.r ? .A\/ ? '^,1.?,.- J `r+'? 5r G:' ? ?? ?;•?'r'.`•:'1"•`i}:?rt'.',,?"TT.?:lli$r:f"V yF,' "('viliFlr ?.tY J.•NLt <`r'' *? •I1?7: 3 kE21i17Ct4ft. , ?r,. , `'•; rf,',`?:t:."vC'"ae?.i rf.;l ?Slt,?,.r,`-k•Ylle • u.: .t'? 47.. o r`•,?} l11 D R r Orr R, v LLif•JN tk !?'t? t'?{ r; :4}{r r ('?5'?{ s 7e?: 3 A f?y r,), s :Vr1 j 1.. Z. '$ IY. '!` ''J' It •,"; R ? w y,'... e ; i•;r 1 { t7` ' ?- 31 1 .I 5 I I s , r ^? - 35': w `'t • -o ^ tt?L`.:: i::.s k fe• :'„ j f <i ". - ,ya „I.?? - W ._ r-?`?T?-?.?.-_n ^ ? a_!'• ?. r'-'?' ?;? 1:.1"?` rrtr'! Pf ? ?l?' n FM 1f?:1:.. .:1 "i:' ,4 Y +' N'. ? 4 r f 9 w $n ?G ;?'? ! `p n .ry:`t. '. GY1?•. :?' •:t' :ry";: Ix, Ski. tC??'ai.8::?;. ? ?•!0 •J d•. ??ti N ?''+J I t8? I"I ln?'S ' ? ?i .i•,c,? ':1S'•'?'1rv-;r1.Sf:.f2? (t,??50r, t:' TX?XIRNC d SERfiACE? " 111 :a,.L ;a;, ? ;t? r,' ?_ [3 ,? i • ADD rJZ9 - kr'un n n - 'TRADE 1-WINDS o g: ; JJESaET'. ) ,• a +: :: r::;..., r'' ?•..AVEt1UE " n V I :os I I rn :e. F'•:: 1 + 1 .r a7 ? 10 ?;^I ? c _?^I • I•I-• ?•? °•' '•e:,. .c• `!' . Y'-. ? ]col ti 4 I 1 rr I I r I I L _ _ f Fir k try i 7 (1, • 5 , ?'' - •; '?{ 1 I . .. I I I . - ? ? I? ? 1 1 E ? • I? '3`? `i' F '?'? ? ? i f l ? l PROPOSED REZONING AND LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT OWNER: First Baptist Church of Clearwater CASE LUZ 00-08-71 SITE: 3070 Chesapeake Lane PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 4,9 - ZONING LAND USE PIN: 1C: 29118lO000O/224121Q0 -? FROM: OS/R R©craation! Open Spar,o -------"--- -- __ --- -_ TO, I institutional ATLAS 292A PAGE: Ordinance No. 6615-00 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION' STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER: First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc. 331 Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 33755 LOCATION: 3070 Chesapeake Lane Generally located on the west side of McMullen Booth, approximately 450 feet south of Drew Street. Legally described as that part of the E '/z of the NW '/a'of the NW'/. of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County (M&B 22/21). ,PIN: 16/29/16/00000/220/2100 REQUEST: To amend the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map from Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) to Institutional (INS), and To rezone from Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) zoning district to the Institutional (1) zoning district. SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 215,600 square feet or 4.9 acres Dimensions of property; 440 feet wide by 490 feet deep PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Chesapeake Part: (City baseball field) Proposed Use: Church PLAN CATEGORY: Current County Category: Open Space/Recreation Proposed Category: Institutional ZONING DISTRICT: Current City District: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) Proposed District: Institutional (I) EXISTING SURROUNDING USES: North: Vacant (Church Proposed by Pending Case LUZ 00-05- 05) South: Low Medium Density Residential East: Institutional/Low Medium Density Residential West: Multifamily Residential ANALYSIS Introduction The' applicant (First Baptist Church of Clearwater) is currently proposing a campus and related educational facilities on 11.8 acres parcel located at the corner of McMullen Booth Road and Drew Street. Immediately adjacent to the south of this property is Chesapeake Park, a 4.9 acre land which the applicant proposes to rezone to institutional district .so that the combined site could be more conveniently developed under the City's Institutional zoning district. Currently; the subject site is used as an active park with a baseball field. Following the rezoning, the applicant proposes to develop this tract along with the adjacent 11.8 acres land for church related activities. Site plan considerations will be addressed in more detail during the development review process. The Pinellas Planning Council and Florida Department of Community Affairs will review this case which'is a threshold amendment for both agencies. 1. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Cleanvater Comprehensive Plan in support of the proposed land use amendment are as indicated below: 2.4 Objective -- Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Land Development Code. The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. L.UZ 00-08-11 2 4 XI. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN Applicable regulations from the Countywide Plan are as indicated below: 2.3.3.7.3 Institutional (INS) P" ose - It is the purpose of this category to depict those areas of the County that are now used , or appropriate to be used, for public/semi public institutional purposes; and to recognize such areas consistent with the need, character and scale of the institutional use relative to surrounding uses; transportation facilities, and natural resource features. Locational Characteristics - This category is generally appropriate to locations where educational, health,,public safety, civic, religious and like institutional uses are required to serve the community; and to recognize the special needs of these uses relative to their relationship with surrounding uses and transportation access. This site is located along the McMullen Booth Scenic Corridor and is designated Recreation/Open Space by the County in the Countywide Scenic Corridor Plan. The Recreation/Open Space Plan classification will neither allow the Institutional future land use designation nor the proposed institutional development at this site. In recognition of the constraints associated with the passive and the open space characteristics of the area, the applicant is requesting a change in both the future land use plan and zoning district to bring this parcel into consistency with both the Countywide Plan and the City zoning district to allow the proposed institutional development and this site. The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the Countywide Plan. III. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY McMullen Booth Road Corridor The McMullen Booth Road corridor in this area between Gulf to Bay Boulevard and State Road 590 is characterized by mixed types of development including commercial uses at the major intersections with the exception of the Drew intersection and institutional and residential uses in between. The Countywide Future Land Use Plan has designated land in this area of the west side of McMullen Booth Road Commercial General, Institutional, .Residential/Office Limited and Residential Urban. The area on the east side of McMullen Booth Road has been designated as Residential Urban, Institutional, Residential Low Medium, Residentia! Medium and Commercial General. Immediate Surrounding Area The Future Land Use Plan (FLU) for the immediate surrounding area along McMullen Booth Road is the proposed Institutional to the north, Residential Urban to the south, Residential Urban and Residential.Low Medium to the west, and Residential Urban and Institutional to the east, Institutional Future Land Use is located on both sides of LUZ 00-UK-11 3 +1 , 1 I 1 McMullen Booth Road within a 'A mile of the subject site. The proposed Future Land Use is in character with the overall FLUP designation along this area. The existing surrounding uses include a vacant lot to the north which is owned by the applicant; low medium density residential and multifamily residential to the west; low medium density residential to the south, and single family residential and institutional to the east. The proposed land use amendment is compatible with surrounding uses due to the similarity of future and existing uses. IV, SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Roadways The subject site is approximately 4.9 acres. The existing plan category is generally appropriate to those public and private open spaces and recreational facilities dispersed throughout the County. It also recognizes the natural and man made conditions which contribute to the active and passive open space character and recreation use at such locations. No use in the plan category would be allowed to exceed a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.25 nor an impervious surface ratio (ISR) of 0.60, New Development Maximum FAR. Golf Elementary Medical Course School Clinic Church Existing County Land Use: Square Feet 53,900 NIA NIA NIA Avg, Daily Vehicle Trips 2 PM Peak Vehicle Trips 2 NIA NIA NIA Proposed Institutional Zoning: Square Feet - NIA 140,140 140,140 140,140 Avg. Daily Vehicle Trips - NIA 1,686 5,063 1,277 PM Peak Vehicle Trips - NIA 437 611 196 NIA -- Not Applicable Note: Closest ITE use is Ballfield Source: 17'E Trip Generation Manual, 6th Ed, 1997 Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance The maximum development potential under the proposed Institutional Zoning District is 140,140 square feet of educational facility, medical clinic, church, hospital, governmental use, congregate care or social and community centers, based on a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.65. However, due to Community Development Code requirements and site planning LUZ 00-08-11 a constraints, it is highly unlikely that the above uses would be developed as intensely as the above table reflects. The more' intense uses in the Institutional Zoning District have been analyzed for the amount of vehicle trips that'could be generated based on maximum development potential. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer'.s manual and the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, the medical clinic. use would generate the most vehicle trips daily (5,063) and PM Peak Hour vehicle trips (611). The Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation guideline for the Institutional Future Land Use Plan category on the next table more accurately portrays potential traffic generation. This guideline is used by the PPC to review transportation impacts of proposed Land Use Plan amendments. MAXIMUM POTENTIAL TRAFFIC McMullen Booth Road and Drew St. Current Existing Proposed PPC Situation Zoning, Zoning Guidelines Maximum Daily Added Potential Trips N/A 2 5,063 818 Maximum PM Peak flour Added Potential Trips NIA 2 611 102* Volume of McMullen Booth from drew Street to SR 60 60,526 60,528 65,589 61,344 LOS of McMullen Booth from Drew Street to SR 60 C . C C C Volume of Drew from US 19 to McMullen Booth 17,950 17,952 18,56) 18,052 LOS of Drew from US 19 to McMullen Booth D D D D NIA = Not Applicable LOS = Level-of-Scrvicc * = City Calculation or 12.5% Source: ITE Trip Ge+teration Ifanual, 61h Ed., 1997 Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance Pinellas County MPO Level of Service 1999 "The Rules" of the County%vide Future Land Use Plan The 2000 Transportation Level of Service manual from the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization assigned the McMullen Booth Road segment from Drew Street to Gulf to Bay an LOS of C and the Drew Street segment from McMullen Booth to US Highway 19 an LOS of D. The McMullen Booth segment is physically constrained with no planned capacity enhancements planned, ART-PLAN, a computer traffic analysis model provided by FDOT, indicates Drew Street will not fall below the acceptable LOS of D with the proposed development. The peak traffic generation of the proposed development will generally occur during; ofd' peak hours, having no effect on the road network.. The level-of-service for McMullen Booth Road will not be degraded by the proposed land use amendment and rezoning since this road segment is at its lowest grade. However, the additional trips could increase traffic congestion. Mass Transit The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The total miles of fixed route service will not change; the subject site is located within '/4 mile of an existing transit route; and headways are less than or equal to one hour. Pinellas LUZ.00-08-11 r.. I ... Suncoast Transit Authority(PSTA) bus service is available along McMullen Booth ]toad and Drew Street. Water The current zoning district could demand approximately 5,390 gallons per day at a rate of 0.1 gallons/day. Under the proposed zoning district, water demand could approach approximately 14,014 gallons per day. The proposed amendment will not affect the City's current LOS for water since there is excess capacity. Wastewater The current zoning district could demand approximately 4,312 gallons of wastewater per day. Under the proposed zoning district, sewer demand could approach approximately 11,211 gallons per'day, The proposed amendment will not affect the City's current LOS for wastewater since there is excess capacity. Solid Waste The current zoning could result in 229 tons of solid waste per year. Under the proposed zoning district, there would be approximately 268 tons of solid waste generated per year. The proposed amendment will not affect the City's current LOS for solid waste disposal since there is excess capacity. Recreation and Open Space The proposed land use amendment and rezoning will not impact the LOS of recreational acreage or facilities due to the proposed non-residential land use and zoning classification. V. IMPACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Prior to redevelopment of the subject property, site plan approval will be required. At that time, the stormwater management system will be required to meet all City and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) stormwater management criteria. The site is not located within an environmentally sensitive area. The proposed land use amendment will not have a negative impact on the natural environment. VI. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS Existing vs. Proposed Regulations - Maximum Development Potential Floor Area Ratio Impervious Surface (FAR) Ratio ([SR) Existing County Land Use 0.25 0.60 Proposed Institutional Zoning 0.65 0.85 LUZ 00-08-11 6 9, The proposed Institutional Zoning District permits an FAR of 0.65 and ISR of 0.85, while the existing Recr'e'ation/Open Space Land Use has an FAR of 0.25 and ISR of 0.60, although FAR applies only to non-residential uses. The ISR of the proposed Institutional District is more intensive.at 0.85 than the existing land use which allows an ISR of 0.60. The entire parcel will meet size requirements for the proposed district and Institutional use, as well as most other uses in the Institutional Zoning District. Approval of this land use plan amendment and zoning district designation does not guarantee the right to develop on the subject property. Transportation concurrency must be met, and the property owner will have to comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested. The existing and proposed use of this property is consistent with the Institutional Zoning District regulations. VII. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS The response from the Community Response Team (CRT) indicates that there is a dilapidated building at this site. However, this structure will be demolished at the time of development of the site. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed Institutional Future Land Use Plan category and Institutional Zoning District request is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of the public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the following actions on this application: I , Amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of 3070 Chesapeake Lane (MB 22121) the subject site from Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) to Institutional (INS); and 2. Amend the zoning district designation of 3070 Chesapeake Lane (MB 22/21) from OS/R zoning to Institutional (1). Submitted by: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner LUZ 00-09-l1 7 r,T .$ ' F1 r..i [.tt a4.Y. i?1 ft •i+'1' 'I ., = 4 ? ? - [??'?` ?Gt`?`y ?t._'}w' 'l: •. E: .. i1. •? .. ?.f' +E'' ?.p.. 11 ?i .., !' 1 .. ?. ? '1 .. ! ??'?E.r `S y?.r. 'f', '..,•; .5; t, ,fig.. „?i. .. .. r ,. ? ? r ff?~i''fri• {r .a? .o .r` .I? `f.= .,r: ;Y .. .F ' ? . ' ? r '1- ?? ???k11?:6@tis=?s"4si?':k 'f 3!tw. •41? `' - ., ra. ...wr,:r:.. ;: a*,!h::.., t...r. .... .. .. ?: ?A,' ?:,•'r:v u.'?!`?;?.;;? r:il:. r ..e.?. ?.. ? ?.. l..a Attachments c•: APPlication Aerial Photograph of Site'and Vicinity, s' Existing Surrounding. Uses Existing Zoning Atlas .. Proposed'Zoning Atlas Existing Land Use Map Proposed Land Use Map L.UZ 00-08-11 K r Location Map ,. F1rstBapptrst Chuxh ofGe3ru-ater NORTH 3070 Chesapeake Lane 320' LUZOaO8-11 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY G ' i p y ?,r E Fl? " ?Aw J W rRAll Ll??..e••-akwor? 3/ Q ,n, 14011 Or CLEN 0" D y a ??? `r^ x < NM`-S?7A•-O-q?F u LAS tired Tenate V[ew Lo r _ OR = PROJECT "K SITE W • 'x? p A!r !fw[GJO /, CR Cf v r\? , y Au3 !A ? 4 a BAT !A N ? N f3AT LA ?. g r:a?r.rwo Y 'T m u•riw• 2 ievaond ? -{?'nHIJ w 7 _ ,irhw'c PAR%WAY n r pOH?r111G $iq([1 r i J N JfF Q fl D, L _ I ?l?rji If rpur••'a CITY OF UF;ARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADM(NiS'lRAION }=?+tc f` ''t ENGINEERING •.. t '.1 .`n'a,':I'?.?IrF.{.1?1?':,{i ?.i£?:It ... .. .. ... r .... ... ..' a .r. . . . .. .. ... 1 , ... , CITY OF CLEARWATER 'Interdepartmental Correspondence TO: ,Mayor. and Commissioners FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk SUBJECT: Follow up from November 13, 2000 Work Session COPIES: William B. Howie, Interim City Manager DATE: November 15, 2000 In response to questions raised at the November 13, 2000, Work Session, the following ` answers are provided in final agenda order: November 2, 2000 Commission Meeting Minutes provided. Regarding Annexations - The Planning Department will address the question about impact fees at the Commission Meeting on Thursday, November 16, 2000. Item #15 Ordinances 6614-00 and 6615-00, First Baptist Church of Clearwater If the schoo is accre ited, then the school is tax exempt. Item #27 - Pinellas Planning Council - Revised item provided. Item #31 -'Agreement with Tampa Bay Water; approval of McKim & Creed Work Order for engineering services - Attached .k r r , i r vb• ?'?, r ? ale r it ORDINANCE NO. 6634-00 AN. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE INVESTMENT OF TEMPORARY SURPLUS MONIES; AMENDING SECTION 2.524, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN THE TYPES OF INVESTMENTS OF CITY FUNDS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida, has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to prudently invest temporary surplus monies; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 2.524, Code of Ordinances, is amended as follows: Sec. 2.524. Investments. Funds of the city not required for immediate disbursement shall be invested at the discretion of the finance director in the Local Government Surplus Trust Fund, any interaovernmental investment pool authorized pursuant to the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act, Security and Exchange Commission registered moaW market funds with the highest credit uali rating from a national) recognized rating agency, interest- bearing time deposits or savings accounts in qualified public depositories, direct obligations of the United States Treasury, Federal agencies and instrumentalities, repurchase agreements commercial paper of prime quality of -the highestjefter and numerical rating as provided for by at least one nationals - recn nized rating service and debt issued by. the State of Florida or any political subdivision thereof including pools , FepeFGhase-ag ate, . .n9-aseeuRts in kw.-A banks, All securities savings-asseWnta or investments shall be in the name of the city IRVestments by by-#he-state -ef GeWRtieG Within the state + be-made-with. Ordinnnca #6634.00 ? ? ? ; ° ??'` .. ?• L ` '3 ?( ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ii +' ? ? ? fit" . . ?? ., ? ? ? . , r , • , r , +? r a`` .4?.r } .. ? ? / ' - ?y .. . , '?f . i ts?•, 3 t 1 + ... ' ., :j ? ? 1 ; ?}'w:.? jZ ? • ` 'i ? 11 ,.. ? ? S," ' ,1....f5 , f t "^:`}f'T': ?a... . . ...az,..a; :1•. ? `?w::4'4S?li?f9??31 ?.+,. [?-..l.l 11 rl•?, r•-? ' .. .. ..,., y. .. " .. . _ .. • . . ? ? ' .. ' r Section 2. This ordinance shatl take effect 31 days after its adoption. 1 PASSED ON FIRST READING November 2. 2000' PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL . READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor; Commissioner. Approved as to form: Attest: -One C. Hayman Cynthia E. Goudeau sistant City Attorney City Clerk i 'i 5 . ? E 2 Ordinance No, 6634.00 tip 1 I I 1 .u. G C 2 F N N a S Q A q N A r _ ? d o 97 o _ f~7 ? 01 N ? to m N d? O>' O vi Cl N N N N j Cj y+ G ?1 W p ~ ? n K f7 11n O. LL C 1? C ?` ?}I 1f1 { 0 ? C N IA N Q ? ? ^ N} ~ N l1 yQ ? p n W ? ? W a- M1 d ti ti C C `? ' JI 10 n 111 O? rp R J! 1$ 4 n ? ?y W A lm 92 ; %; v S W L G c G G CL U3 v"'i 10 ` -; LL LL a w u n n V m c.j a v N r i in e?i u?i o U m t c r u a In m c v g v H y li ? y? LLl Q H vaj 111 N N N N N d 8 cN $o pry N'' c c •? o n w nc°7 n ro= ? y C zN 6 e N C a ? C LL U '? ? ti n .av Xz N ? u N +R U ?4` ry en ' c C W f p a rn m a 0 4 N G LL ?D 2 Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Work session Item N: Final Agenda Item #i ' 1E Meeting Date: 11116100 SUBJECTIRECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for "Additional Soil Remediation at 902927 Cleveland Street (Parcel B)" owned by the Community Redevelopment Agency, for the sum of $89,500.00 to Dames & Moore, d and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • On June 3, 1999, the City Commission approved the purchase by the CRA of two parcels of land along Cleveland Street (SR 60). These parcels are commonly addressed as Parcels A & B. • On June 1, 2000, the City Commission awarded a contract to Dames and Moore in tite amount of $94,133.00 to remove twenty- one (21) hydraulic lifts and two (2) below-ground storage tanks and associated contaminated soils from Property B. Additional studies and assessment activities required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) were also completed under this contract. • As a result of these activities additional contaminated soils have been discovered in the areas of two of the hydraulic lifts. These conmrninated soils will require excavation, treatment and disposal. Additional assessment and confirmatory samples will be required to prepare the property for redevelopment. It is considered impractical to bid this work as per section 2.564(1)(e) Code of City Ordinances, dale to the knowledge Dames and Moore has gained on this site regarding the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination. Dames and Moore's knowledge of this site is from the recent tank and lift removals, Supplemental Environmental Assessments, and the development of a FDEP- approved Monitoring Plan for these parcels. Furthermore, Dames & Moore has represented the City in cooperation with the City's environmental legal counsel during negotiations with FDEP regarding the assessment and remediation of this site. The entire cost of this contract will be paid for with State Brownfields Appropriations. This project will start immediately after award and execution of contract, and will be completed within 30 calendar days. • Further, all appropriations from State Agreement # SP 530, which are unencumbered as of 1213112000, will be required to be returned to FDEP. An approximate total of $252,584.00 of State and Federal Brownfields Funds have been expended on assessment, remediation and demolition activities to date. Currently an additional $89,500.00 required for soil remediation and an estimated forthcoming expenditure of approximately $20,000 is anticipated for demolition activities for one additional stnieture required to complete the project. The total estimated Brownfields expenditure for this project is estimated at $362,084.00 for all assessment, remediation and demolition activities to prepare the site for development. Reviewed by: Legal Info SNt ? Budget Public Works Purchasing DCMIACM Risk Mgn1t NIA Other Submitted by: City Manager Originating Dept: WA Economic Development M. hallo User Dept. Economic Development NIA Attachments ? None Costs $69,500.00 Total Funding Source: Current FY Cl OP Other Appropriation Code: 181-99801-530100-559-000 101-99976-530100-559-000 Printed on recycled paper Dimmitt Soil Remediation f: _TTL Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item 11: Final Agenda Item # !I•I?•oU Meeting Date: SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve a non-exclusive License Agreement between the CITY OF CLEARWATER and NEXTEL SOUTH CORPORATION authorizing installation of telecommunications equipment upon the West Water Tank, 1780 Weston Drive, situate in the Southwest A of the Southwest of Section 2, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, for an initial term of five years commencing within 180 days of full execution of the License Agreement, granting Licensee the-option to extend for LIP to three additional terms of five years each, providing initial annual rent of $27,500 payable the first of the month following the commencement date, adjustable annually a maximum of 4% in conformity with the Consumer Price Index, 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: + Nextel South Corporation ("Licensee") proposes to initially install a total of 9 antennae in three arrays upon the catwalk of the City water tank at 1780 Weston Drive. + The anntennae will connect with automated telecommunications equipment in a 10, X 20" communications shelter to be located within a 600 square foot area in the northeast corner of the water tower compound. All exposed surfaces will color match the water tower. + The Licensee may later add additional antennae; with annual rent to adjust on a pro-rata basis. + The Licensee will be responsible for all utility costs, and any property taxes related to its telecommunications installation. + The installation will be made in accordance with a site plan approved by the City Building Construction Permit BCP 2000-01466. • Rent will adjust each anniversary based on the annual Consumer Price Index ("CPI") published 120 days prior to the anniversary date. • If the Licensee is not in default, it may elect to extend the License term for up to five additional five-year terms upon providing Notice to the City not later than 90 days prior to termination of the current term. Annual CPI rent adjustments will continue to apply. e The License is irrevocable except for material breach of the agreement, or in the event City determines the West Water Tank is no longer practical or feasible to operate, or if Licensee's equipment would be detrimental to any City communications equipment that may later be installed upon the water tank. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: ?/?? Costs 'Legal r Info Srvc IT I w Total -Budget Public Works ]?lo ,/ User Dept. ? Funding Source: Purchasing DCM/ACM Public Utilities Current FY Cl Risk Mgmt • Finance ai Attachments OP Other Submitted by: City Manager ' D None Appropriation Code: Printed on recvcled paper Rev. 21911 N „, s Clearwater City Commission Worksession Item 11: j Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: ; SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Authorize extension of Countryside Library operating hours to include Sundays from 1 to 5 p.m. beginning in January 2001. IM and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: In response to numerous community requests for Sunday operating hours at the Countryside Library, staff recommends extending the library's hours to include 1 to 5 p.m. on Sundays. This will be accomplished... • By transferring two existing FTF's (currently vacant with no plans to fill) to the Library Depaitrrlent, the positions of Quality of Life Administrator and Strategies for Success Director. • Hiring two part-time Librarian I's and two part-time Library Assistants. Additional hours will be provided for a Library Page and Custodian. FY 2000101 (partial year: Jan - Sept) operating costs are anticipated to be approximately $39,625. The estimated annual cost for FY 2001102 is $56,120. Approximately $20,000 of the current year's cost will be provided by an unanticipated increase in the revenues estimated to be received from the Pinellas Public Library Cooperative. These proceeds are above those estimates originally provided by the Cooperative and adopted in the current budget. Salary savings anticipated in the Quality of Life program will provide the balance of $19,825. These amendments will be reflected in the City Manager's first quarter report. The Library will provide the City Manager and Commission with an update on Sunday library use in two months. The Countryside Library's current operating hours are: Monday - Thursday 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Friday and Saturday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs Legal x Info Srvc X Library/John Szabo ?j Total Budget Public Works X User Dept. Funding Source: Purchasing x DCMIACM Library Current FY cl Risk Mgmt X Other x Attachments 01' Other a b 13W ty ' 1 11 None M Ci ?J(? City Manager r t A roriatian Code: Printed an recvcled paver Rev. 2198 ?f f e .'.. ?; 1'?`i•.ti,. 'kl:. : 1'''Tis' '?ia:'.i. ' ' LiB a Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: , V SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve book leasing agreement with McNaughton Book Service for one year at a cost not to exceed $17,037.30. ? and that the'appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Book leasing is an effective way for libraries to address the short-term heave demand for bestsellers without having to maintain multiple purchased titles in long-term inventory. It will allow the Library to provide several additional copies of current bestsellers and return them for newer titles as demand fades. The proposed book leasing plan would have the following features: New book monthly allowance of 100. • Free annual retention of 25% of allowance/300 per year. e Total annual cost: $17,037.30 The Library would continue to purchase copies of best-selling titles. The leased books would supplement them to meet the short-term demand. Funding for this contract will be provided by the return of funds from project 315-93521, Library Books/Materials, at first quarter in the amount of $17,037.30-and appropriating these funds to the line item for contractual services. Reviewed by: Legal Info Tech NA Budget rte] Public Works NA Purchasing DCMIACM Risk Nigmt NA Other NA . Submitted by: 00 ? City Man er Printed on recycled oaner Originating Dept: Library / John Szabo User Dept. Attachments Leasing Agreement ? None Costs Funding source: Oplial ImprrnemenS Other Appropriation Code: 7,037.30 Total Current Fiscal Year M" I f • 11 V i MR1- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Work session Item it: Final Agenda Item # '?z t? Meeting Dale: 11/116/00 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for "New Airplane I'-Hangars at Clearwater Airparli" (00-0031-AP) to GLE Construction Services, Inc., of Tampa, Florida for the sum of $596,021.35 which is iltc lowest responsible bid received in accordance with the plans and specifications and authorise a live-year load from the Central Insurance Fund at tite cash pool rate in the amount of'S298,011, 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: On June 15. 2000 the City of Clearwater approved a Supplemental Joint Project Agreement (JPA) with the State of Florida, Department of Transportation. Resolution 00-15, to design and construct two aircraft T- hangars and one corporate hangar at Clearwater Airpark. The JPA authorized the construction of the hangars on a 50150 cost sharing basis with the City's share budgeted in the 2000/2001 Capital Improvement Fund. One- half the estimated east. or $298,011 will be borrowed from the Central insurance fund to provide for the matching dollars. This loan will be amortized over five years, and will be repaid from revenues generated from the Marine/Cleanvater Airpark Fund. The State of Florida will reimburse the City for the State's share upon completion of the project. The proposed budget for this project was estimated to be $600,000 in the FY 2000101 capital improvement budget. There is a current waiting list of 28 persons waiting for hangar space at the airpark. Current exposed tic-downs generate between $50 and $70 per month per space. enclosed hangars are constructed in units of 10 and generate $300 to $370 per month per space. This project is in keeping; with the Airpark Nlasterplan and has the support of the Airport Authority Advisory Board. The details of the master plan through 75% completion have been presented with monthly updates to the Airport Authority Advisory Board, and at neighborhood public meetings on November 13, 1999 and May 2.2000. This project will start as soon as possible after award and execution of the contract, and is scheduled to be completed within 120 calendar days. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs S_596,021.35 Legal Info Srvr NIA Marine (Bill Morris) Tolal Budget Public Works User Dept. Funding Source: Purchasing IA DCNVACht Marina Current FY X CI X Disk Mgml NIA Other Attachments OP X Parks & Rec. NIA Other Submitted by: U © None Appropriation Code City Manager 315-94713-562800-575-000 Printed on recycled nauer New Airpla ne 1'-Hangars at Clearwater Airpark Rev. 2190 i A 8 9 8 88 8 8H 8V. .rx aR 9. 8 g ? CCC M N M N N M N N ? N ? N M N N ? a $ ' a a a? a HH ? $R - - - - ? ? N M N N N - - s a n 8$ a gg aa a ga s -?a {- - ? y ? Y ? M N M N N N N NN NN N N N N L S i aA F a e 4 M e f O i ? ! ? r, 88 8 e p $P? G I """"'111 1 N N N M N N N M M ? N i YT N N 8 H 8 8 . 82 8 88 R9 V 2 xr 0! a s _ i n l P'$ NN +1 d Y g xr o J F? ` wr1? N N M w N N N N ? N N d I a y N? N N ? N ¢ $ P ?? r'. e8 9 88 N N N N N N N N N N - - - c p H K a 88 o 84 { a Sa 4C,? C -? .? 88 a 8 7 , N N N N N N N N G G N L ? ? N N gg 2 Sz r 8R 8 83 _ 8 8 p N N N N N N N N N N ? r $ ? N ? 8a 8 3a .? a- ? sa x r ? yti N N N M N N •1 N N S i k N N N L I - ? ? yx C » a $ 8g 8 88 rJ N r V' C ' ? N N N N " N N N N , N ? M ~ N Y , , - cy?tt U 3 88 8 88 m vs a ss S {7 ? ? + [ ? 14 N N C { G N N N ? 7, { t ?! I J S 4 N ?1 8 2 as v I S E qM S r .i n w L ? o r. g^ J? c. p 3 o.. S ". ? AP ` ? r 0 ? G ? t '+ '" ?a' N N N N N N N - N N ? ? V 8 a 8 8 F 8 $ fi 88 8H 8 8 8 ' 8 = ? k 5 '1 0 h ! ? N N N N M N N N N N N N M N N f 8 8 P $ N 8 P 8 9 a s 8 8 a ii.. C ? a N M N M : N Y, N A N a N N - N N _ L TZ >> rlra' H 8 ? $ fi 8 $ 8 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 ..lt ??7y ? ? O ? a /` ... n g . ? ti S t y 0. 4 77 N N N M N N N F - N ? N N N L - S - ? ? r 8 ?l 8 n 8 8 8 8 8 8 ? m ? ? y ? ?5 ' ?, 8 Q •1 N P ? V ? ? g O ? p Q '?t Q L V h ffgg77 ? N N N N N ? e Y ti N ? N - _ r 8 r= += 3 8 x fi a 8 ? ? o 8 ? R ? ?i ? ? a? N N N N N - N N LI N 17 I _ N N N V ? 8 9 N ? ? o ? ~ O O ~ ? ?pp+ ? 1? N G f r N N N N N N N N N { ?} - F U ? ? a y $ - e u I L s a P ?? Z +C ?? ?? ? Z Y ti v N W q p h ? o _ ?a! ? f. C aV : a f7 ? ' p V n v? yy ? R$ K ? ? y WiC ? >~ F P F >?G ?--' W a 1 a0-? Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: a? Approve an agreement with the YWCA of Tampa Bay (YWCA) for provision of interpretation/ translation services as part of an Hispanic Services Outreach Program during the period January 1, 2001 - September 30, 2001, in an estimated amount of $45,350, in accordance with Sec. 2.564(1)(e), Code of Ordinances -- Sole Source _?x and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • As part of the police department's Hispanic Initiative, Clearwater budgeted a grand total of $80,000 in Weed and Seed funding to contract with the YWCA for implementation of an Hispanic Services Outreach Program consisting of advocacy on behalf of Hispanic crime victims and interpretation/translation for Spanish-speaking individuals in their dealings with the police. • The YWCA has been providing interpretation/translation services for Clearwater's Weed and Seed Hispanic community pursuant to a purchase order issued under the department's FY 1999/2000 Weed and Seed grant. That purchase order expires effective December 31, 2000. • A new agreement has been prepared to provide for the continuation of these services during the remainder of FY 2000/2001. That agreement is in the amount of $45,350 and will be charged to the $80,000 budgeted for the entire Hispanic Services Outreach Program, Special Project # 181- 99323. • The YWCA has been determined to be the sole source for provision of all of the above-referenced services. The Executive Office for Weed and Seed (EOWS) mandated that Clearwater partner with an agency in the Weed and Seed area that could provide at least half of the funding for our Hispanic Services Outreach Program. The YWCA's Clearwater office is located in the Weed and Seed area. The YWCA also provides $99,273 in services to the Hispanic Services Outreach Program through the PETALS and Community Connections programs, thereby satisfying SOWS requirements. There is no other comparable agency in the Weed and Seed area able to provide these services for the Hispanic community. • An agreement between the City of Clearwater and the YWCA setting forth the conditions of the provision of interpretation/translation services by the YWCA has been prepared. A copy of the agreement is available for review in the City Clerk's Department. Reviewed by: Originating a ? P li Costs Legal 0: Info 5rvc n/a w o ce Prepared : Janet Skinner Total $45,350 Budget a --- Public Works n/a User Dep 71 Funding Source: Purchasing 3? DCM/ACM Pa i Current FY $451350 Cl Risk Mgmt nla Other nla Attachments OP Other Grant Submitted by: , 40 ® None Appropriation Code: 181.99323.530300.521.000 City Manager , -tl? - ---- -- Weed and Seed rant funding Printed on recvcted naner Rev. 21911 • i} r ?f t , a Clearwater C - -. Commission Worksession Item N: Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item 0 Meeting Date: SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Establish a new capital improvement project titled E.C. Moore Fields S &.9 to be included in the City of Clearwater Capital Improvement Program for FY 2001102 for a total estimated cost of $53010001 and that the aoorooriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: On July 11, 2000 the citizens of Clearwater approved a referendum for the transfer of Chesapeake Park (4.9 acres) to Calvary Baptist Church in exchange for property (5.0 acres) located on Drew Street west of Eisenhower School and an amount not to exceed $330,000 to construct replacement facilities. The City has since closed on the exchange of property. As part of the agreement, Calvary Baptist Church has agreed to allow the City of Clearwater to maintain and operate the field at Chesapeake Park until they . begin construction at this area (3 - 4 years). Staff recommends that a capital improvement project be established so that the development of the ballfields can occur during FY 2001/02. • Staff will seek the additional $200,000 needed for this project from available grant opportunities. If staff is not successful in obtaining the additional funding from grants needed to construct two ballfields then one ballfield will be developed with the $330,000 from the church. • No additional operating expenses are anticipated. Operating expenses currently identified for the Chesapeake Park site would be transferred to the new facilities. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs Legal NIA Info Srvc NIA Kevin Dunbar Total $530,0000 Budget Public Works NIA User Dept. Funding Source: Purchasing ?A DCM/ACM Parks & Recreation Department Current NIA Cl FY Risk Mgmt NIA Other NIA Attachments OP Other 530,000 submitted by: • 44 City Manager 44os. ? None A ra riation Cade: printed on recycled Paper Rev. 2/93 ? rta Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item 1t: Final Agenda Item 9 Meeting Date: a5 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract to construct the expansion of the Countryside Community Recreation Center (Bid #00-0032-PR) to Eveland Brothers, Inc., of Clearwater, Florida for $464,640 and approve a subsequent change order deduct in the amount of $12,670, for a net contract amount of $451,970, © and that the a ro riate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • On June 15, 2000 the City Commission approved a capital appropriation of $500,000 to construct an addition to the Countryside Community Recreation Center. • This contract includes the construction of approximately 4270 sq. ft. of new programming space, restrooms, storage, enlargement of fitness room, installation of irrigation and landscaping. • This construction will allow for expanded fitness opportunities, increased gymnasium activities, expanded City and contract led programs. • Total project is budgeted at $500,000. The design of the project resulted in a contract to Harper Partners, Inc., in the amount of $33,000. Leaving available funding of $467,000 for the construction of the center. • The total bid of $464,640 includes a 10% contingency. Staff is recommending that the contingency be reduced to 7% so that alternate #1, which includes irrigation and landscaping, can be included in this contract. This will result in a reduction of $12,670 resulting in a net contract amount of $451,970 and will not have an adverse impact on the design and function of the facility. • Anticipated completion date is April 25, 2001. • Additional operating expenses of $26,900, including 1.2 FTE's with revenues of $30,000, were approved in FY 2000101. Reviewed by: Legal Info srvc budget Public works Purchasing NIA DCM/ACM Risk Mgmt NIA Other Submitted by- City Manager 40 Prinled nn reeveted naner originating Dept: NIA Parks & Recreation Depart Kevin Dunbar, Director User Dept. ? ?i+/ Parks & Recreation D art Attachments: 13 None Costs Total 451,970 Funding Source: Current FY NIA CII' OP _ Other ation Code: 315.93233 Rrv. 21011 S I II ? ` E1 ? ? Y ? N ? N Rf1 1i _.. &a ? 44 VO ' VF '^ 44 64 Q- W p . p 8 $ p 4 G Q O p O U7 4 ' 1? Y ? N N N N l On m - - N N 11 4--- y ? ? I N LL ? ? ? ? ? a t= z m v Cd T ri ? N N N N ? ti ?$ $ S? 8 S TS 8 a Q 5? p _ m 4ti0 N F N ??CA N N N N N N N m u S S S 8 U) 136 IL a Z N N F N ? N O 2 ? ? g ? $ a s o 5 t { g g t o ?x a-? ? ?r Q 4 q ? ? a N N N -N N N N _ - (? Q Q ? U u p O p Q O O pp G g 4 W ? v u z ..! N c7 d v N r4 pp z v .: T u 0 0 G ? $ O IY W a go ? ? g T ? m Q go a qp td N y V { y d Q M N N M N N N .? 7` m ? fWA _ pp O S ?? _pp G 0 S.1 n Y r ? S S G] Q Q P U x a cY{ $ $?? e?fi T y ? ?S ° O v -W ° ? N 'x00 N N N ..._ r N -- N N N _. W $ g $ $ ou C x Y] $o Z W o O01 t ? r ? c; T ?2 C Q : ? J •N3 ? r J D - G - _ Y f 1 b O V ?? - z z Q C m Q a .- 0 b c N 0?maw o O l - W W i RRO gs 0 Ix U- A 41oaa i.1 z m U x o s 3 N I ' m g - t1! LL x .s. 'D N LW7 m a o O n a (n r= z 0 p z, z =r°wzo? cr m 0 a m g wUR ' Q gfu a.Eo nnz n Q Z 0 yt a n u x o ?j ? .e m a: 3 y ^• Y N N1 .r ? ' t s I LD <?T Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksesslon Item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: Nov. 16, 2000 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve a work order with Wade-Trim Consulting, Engineer -of- Record, in the amount of $67,395 to provide engineering and planning services for the Enclave Annexation program. MOTION: APPROVE the work order with Wade-Trim in the amount of $ 67,395. and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same, SUMMARY: In November, 1999, the City Commission authorized a limited scope of services with Wade-Trim Consulting for investigation of the enclave annexation program.. At the September 30, 2000 City Commission work session, Wade-Trim and the Planning Department presented the results of their analysis. The research indicates that 20 property owners of the 140 total enclaves under one acre are interested in pursuing annexing to the City through this program. This proposal presents a revised work order with Wade-Trim for the planning and engineering services to complete the annexation program for these twenty interested property owners. The scope of planning services includes preparation of the analyses of the annexation applications, presentations at the Community Development Board, City Commission, Pinellas Planning Council and the Board of County Commissioners. The scope of engineering services includes preparation of the design, permitting and construction documents for sewer connections to the 20 property owners. Wade-Trim was selected at the initiation of this project as the firm most qualified through experience and staff qualifications to provide both planning and engineering services. The Planning and Engineering Departments recommend that Wade-Trim be selected for this work order to insure continuity with the project and to complete it in the most timely and cost effective method possible. There is an available balance in Capital Project 96630, Sanitary Sewer Extensions, that is adequate to fund this project. The engineering scope of the contract is estimated at $ 52,060; the planning services are estimated at $ 15,335 for a total work order amount of $ 67,395. Reviewed by- Legal da Info Srvc NIA Budget ? Public Works Purchasing NIA DCMfACM Risk Mgmt NIA Other Submitted by: City Manager TO 4" Originating Dept.: Costs Planning Dept. Total 67395 Usor Dept.: _,,ltt? Engineering •-1?" Current FY Attachment: ? None Appropriation Code: 315-96630.561300-5; Funding Source: Ci x OP Othe r printed nn reevnied naner yd's ','rC ;, qry ',, s.• ,' ? ? :(.. .? ' ? , M"i 'en ? r ? ?/• [i ??,1-+ :v,. 'b,'a:, '! 'w 2C!'?(?L: .?.qMj. 1'4`S>[',?1:"`, r ,n"^,4a3H .?°, -I'.1"' •? ??, f. '?' Yt?, ??i4 ?'`s{ yc V-, >y?"'?, ?.'}.a-?%j c'p• ??; ?:;, :t,:+h?":. c;-. 7•,,...5 'iF r? '°F>,.," -.?' ? •p. 4 3, ?n?: `rf'?N '°?{;• €'. ? a ??4'>. F?::} '.;°\ ?,t.,?,, fl.r ?},•-''F. 1'''i:;? (I?.., r`-)' ".`td ?'': s' .?.? ,'.'i'';•? °r»t:.,' ?? is nf1•'{?t.(? {t '.?. ?..?.?,ri•?f?H,,S?? ., „?>?. ,},?r;7i_7 ,•I•,;t ,y }?.c, -?S??r`-.Y' `'ta "x r'? ,:4';tf ;r i,rz ,=5.:i:ik,. :f:,. '..5? r't ? ??J.33.7} l .1 £f?p?j{{ ?+,?' ?=y° .fr3'E ..'u.???').F{• . S ?i ? ' 7 'Y'? ?r'' ?i i : a'. alk 3 ? ?? .•h- :rV :s-<,,! . ??' ?'?S? ? l.? .? c g,1,r.r? :4 . +''? r ? :,?;i :?, ?. ?{ , °. '? '? ? .J t ,.,$Y,! ..'? ?1.? ?w ?,?°' :?, r. f}.ls •x^ ? S. -,,.,, .•k ',<kt ?•3? ? ? ? 9,'?J• _ "}.1}. .f• ?'?' _ •SG'?•s 'a .t ??i' `1 - ';F'p..l. ,i"" µ.. ; `;:. b . p1 tl?.Z..E. ?' .?=rJ&•-i :°:i31'?' .,,?w?Y 1 `i ,fis ?"`?_??>? b-S: '', ..fii3 •?7, P_-:.: , ? < :E 'S?''; a'yS?F.7saewiC.?i 7#:°a'. jt?l .- ;yWy,jk,. g .,!v....r M--#271 te--- f. .'i is 1•.rl '?Ta ?. i.l'a? ! ,• Clearwater City Commission Final Agenda Item # Agenda Cover Memorandum lip I C I K ^ Meeting Date; 11/16100 S U B j ECTIRECOMMEN DATI O N: Reappoint Commissioner Hart to the Pinellas Planning Council for the term 111101-12131102 L__l and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Commissioner Hart is the current representative serving a term to 12131100. The board meets on the 3rd Wednesday of the month at 9:30 a.m. The PPC requests to have the City's action on this appointment prior to 11130/00. Reviewed by: Legal NA Budget NA Purchasing NA Risk Mgmt NA Info Tech NA Public Works NA DCM/ACM Other NA City CI ct39 S. Thomas User D Attachments ? None Costs submitted by: 446,-i? City Manager--- 10 Printed on recycled saner Total Funding Source: Caplial Improvement Operaling Olber Current Fiscal Year Appropriation Code: PINELLAS PLANNI NG COUNCIL CQUNCII. M EMBERS September 25, 2000 Mr. William B. Horne, Interim City Manager City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756-4748 Councilrnember Robert A. Kersteen, Chm. Mayor Tom De Cesare, Vice Chm. HLL;UVEDCouncilmernber Chuck Wiliiarns, Treas. Vice-Mayor Nadine S. Nickeson, See. School Board Member Lee Benjamin Mayor Frank DiDor7ato, D.C. S?? 6 Mayor Robert DiNicola Commissioner Calvin D. Harris Commissioner £d Hart Commissioner Janet Henderson CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Mayor Robert Jackson Mayor Williarn B. Smith Councilrnember David Ti!ki David R Heziley, AICP Re: Appointment of Representative to Pinellas Planning Council ExecutivL- Director Dear Mr. Horne: This is to remind you that all current appointments to the Planning Council expire on December 31, 2000. Our Special Act calls for all subsequent appointments to be made biennially on or before January 1 of the year following the expiration of the previous term. The new appointment will be effective for the two year period, January 2001, through December, 2002. Current members are eligible for reappointment and, given the importance of continuity to.- the Council, I urge you to coordinate this action with your current representative, Commissioner Ed Hart. It would be very helpful to our process if you could schedule this item for action by your Commission and advise us of same prior to November 30, 2000, Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, David P. Healey, A.I.C.P. Executive Director cc: Commissioner Ed Hart, Pinellas Planning Council Representative 600 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 850 • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755-41160 TELEPHONE (727) 46441250 • FAX (727) 464.8212 - Qc?-- Clearwater City Commission Final Agenda Item # ' Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Dale; I 1 . I & .00 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve expenditure of $300,000.00 to acquire two parcels on Spencer Avenue for stormwater retention project and to settle civil action brought against City in Winkelmann, et al. v. City of Clearwater and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: A long standing flooding problem exists in the 600 Block of Spencer Avenue which results in the flooding of several duplexes located behind the shopping center (located at the southwest corner of Gulf- to-Bay, and Duncan Avenue). This project has been in the conceptual stage for several years and recently has become the subject of a suit against the City (Sandra Winkelmann, et al. v. City of Clearwater, Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Case No. 97-7138-CI-11). The property owners are seeking damages for inverse condemnation and related damages, and costs and attorney fees. This area has been identified as a possible project site in the Stevenson Creek Watershed Management Plan currently being developed. The purpose for which these properties are to be acquired is to extend and enlarge an existing retention pond which lies to the north of the subject properties in order to increase its capacity for stormwater retention, It is believed this will help alleviate the local flooding problem which occurs during heavy rains. The funds for this acquisition are budgeted and come from the Stevensons Creek Estuary C.i,P, 375- 9 6129-5 60100-5 3 9000. In addition to providing additional stormwater retention capacity, the acquisition of these properties will result in dismissal of the suit and a release of all claims against the City. Reviewed by: Legal - l1 k Budget IAL? Purchasing A Risk Mgmt } Submitted by: Info Tech NA Public Works ?? DCM/ACM Other NA Originating Dept: Costs $300,000 Legal Total User Dept. Funding Source; caplwl Imoroverwil X Current Fiscal Year Attachments alxvaling Other Appropriation Code: 0 None 375-96129-560100--539-000 Printed on recycled 112per Rev. 2190 Clearwater City Worksession item fl; Commission F1naI Agenda Item # Agenda Cover Meeting Date, 1 Memorandum SUBJECURECOMME'NDATION: Fraternal Order of Police, Clearwater Supervisors Collective Bargaining Agreement Approve the collective bargaining agreement as negotiated between the City of Clearwater and FOP Supervisors for Fiscal Years 2000/2001, 2001/2002, and 2002/2003. and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The most recent collective bargaining agreement between the City of Clearwater and FOP Supervisors expired on September 30, 2000. City management staff and representatives of FOP Supervisors met beginning In April of 2000 to negotiate a new contract. The parties reached a tentative agreement,on October 19, 2000. The Union submitted the proposed agreement to its membership who ratified the agreement by a vote of 25 to 4 on October 30, 2000. This Is a three-year agreement which contains the following major provisions: • General Wag.e_lncrease: Provide for general wage increases of 3% ($92,532) the 1" year, 3.5% ($111,382) the 2"J year, and 3.5% ($116,556) the 3" year, effective at -the beginning of each of the respective fiscal years. 'Thls would be In addition to the existing "step" Increases which are projected to cost approximately $65,000 In the 1" year, $45,000 in the 2' year, and $50,000 In the 3'° year. • Job Assi nment Pa : Provide to bargaining unit members assigned to Community Policing, SWAT. Crime Scene, Traffic Homicide, and certified by the Department as 131-lingual ($7,800 In 1" year, $9,360 In 2nd year, and $10,920 In Vyear). • Allowances; Increase plain-clothes allowance and canine detail allowance ($1,720 In I" year, $2,640 In 2'"' year, and $3,560 In 3i0 year). • leaves of Absence; Provide additional vacation day for 20 years of service and higher. Award bonus days for Sick Leave Incentive Instead of converting from Sick leave. Increase compensatory time maximum from 80 hours to 120 hours. Increase Union Time from 80 hours to 272 hours, • Senlori : Allow for no more than four Field Training Officer squads with one current and any future squad created over and above the current Patrol teams to be assigned to a permanent shift. • Insurance: Provide for 100% standard HMO coverage for employee-only health Insurance for duration of agreement. Reviewed by: Legal Info Tech Budget public Works Purchasing A DCM/ACM RlskMgmt NA Other Originating Dept.: Costs NA ADelPreia/Humoni2esources Total NA User Dept.: Funding Source: NA Current FY Cl NA Attachments OP Other Submitted eby: r „?, .. - 44. ? p Nona City Manager ??? Printwri nn ranvrlnrl nnnor i ?r ' Gear water City Commission Warksessian Item #; Agenda Cbver Nomorandum Find Agenda Item # :3 `-/ Meeting Dane: 1 - 16 - n o S1J6LECTHEMMMENDATION: Approve creation of a new Article IV, of Chapter 28 Clearwater Code of Ordinances providing regulations for users of City rights-of-way; and pass Ordinance #6637-00 on first reading, © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • During the 2000 Regular Session the Florida Legislature created the Communications Services Tax Simplification Law. • The law is intended to simplify the tax structure for telecommunications services and assure that all providers are regulated uniformly. • A requirement of the law is that prior to January 1, 2001, municipalities mast adopt public rights-of-way regulations which treat all telecommunications services equally. • The subject Code of Ordinance additions define the process to obtain a permit for work in City rights-of- way and set forth construction specifications for such work, RMowed by: Originating Dept: Costs None Legal Info Svc NA t Public Works (M. Q illen Total Budget NA Public Works r-?y?(n ' 1 User Dent. Funding Source: Purchasing NA DCMfACM ?' Legal Current FY Ci Rsk Mgmt NA Other Attachments OP Ordinance #6637-00 Other • Submitted by: City Manager 13 None Appropriation Code; Prided on remanded oaaer Rev. 2198 e .t I fW3- ORDINANCE NO. 6637-00 AN ' ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION IN CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY; CREATING A NEW ARTICLE IV OF CHAPTER 28, CODE OF ORDINANCES CONSISTING OF . SECTIONS 28.91 THROUGH 28.99; PROVIDING A STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND INTENT; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING PROCEDURES TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO WORK IN RIGHTS-OF-WAY; PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUCH WORK; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . WHEREAS, Section 253(c) of the Telecommunications Act leaves to State and local government the authority to manage Rights-of-way; WHEREAS, Section 337.401, Florida Statutes, provides that local governments are authorized to prescribe and enforce reasonable rules and regulations with reference to the placing and maintaining of utilities along, across, on, over, or under, any Rights-of-way and may grant to a resident or corporation organized or licensed in the state of Florida the use of the Rights-of-way in accordance with said rules and regulations; WHEREAS, in accordance with the Congressional intent of Section 253 of the Telecommunications Act, Section 337.401, Florida Statues, and the Communications Services Tax Simplification Law, Laws of Florida No. 2000-260, and in furtherance of its home rule powers, the City desires to place certain reasonable rules and regulations on the use of the Rights-of-way by Utilities; WHEREAS, deregulation of telecommunications companies has led to multiple requests for the use of the City's Rights-of-way, and prior to deregulation there was a monopoly on telecommunications service; WHEREAS, home rule power under the Florida Constitution and Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, empower the City to control use of its Rights-of-way; WHEREAS, the federal and state governments, through legislation or their designated agencies, has preempted the ability of the City to regulate and control its own Rights-of-way. WHEREAS, the City's Rights-of-way are heavily burdened at present, and the Rights-of-way will only continue to become more crowded; Ordinance 116637-00 E i , r , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, that: Section 1. A new Article IV of Chapter 28, Code of Ordinances consisting of Sections 28.91 through 28.99, is created to read, ARTICLE IV UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IN RIGHTS-OF-WAY Sec. 28.91. Intent. The purpose and intent of this Article is to establish a competitively neutral policy for use of the Rights-of-way for the provision of electric service, cable service, telecommunications service, and other Utility service by private companies and providers of Utilities other than the City. This Article is intended to preserve the public's traditional use of the Rights-of-way while allowing access to the Rights-of- way to Utilities; to regulate the placement of structures and facilities in the Rights-of- way pursuant to Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, and the Constitution of the State of Florida; to regulate the construction, installation, maintenance, repair, removal and replacement of facilities in the Rights-of-way; and to ensure that there is adequate space in the Rights-of-way to safely, efficiently, and economically accommodate public utilities supplied by the City of Clearwater. Sec. 28.92. Definitions. Annual General Permit shall mean an annual permit issued to a Utility governing routine maintenance and repair activities and providing expedited customer service. Cable service shall be defined as in 47 U.S.C. §522. City shall mean the City of Clearwater, Florida.' City Staff shall mean the Public Works Administrator. Conduit shalt mean a device through which a wire, pipe or cable may be channeled. Construct or Construction shall mean any repair, alteration, pavement cut, grading, excavation, filling, relocation, replacement, placement of new facilities, or other type of improvement in the Rights-of-way. Economically Impossible shall mean the cost of performing the activity required by this Ordinance would place an unreasonable economic hardship on the Utility. 2 Ordinance d663 7-00 Emergency shall mean a situation when a repair is needed to be completed immediately because of a danger to individuals or interruption in service. Facilities shall mean any device used for transmission of telecommunications, electricity, television broadcasts, or any other facility used by a Utility in the process of delivering service to their customers. Franchise shall mean any agreement between a Utility and the City for use and occupation of the Rights-of-way. Greenery shall mean protected trees as defined in Article 8 of the Clearwater Community Development Code and other types of plant life, New Facilities shall mean any facilities to be placed in the Rights-of-way by .a Utility where no facilities owned by that Utility existed prior to this construction. This term expressly excludes replacement of existing facilities and emplacement of parallel facilities in order to provide service to new customers. Person includes individuals, firms, associations, joint ventures, partnerships, estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations. Public land shall mean any property owned by the City that is not considered a Rights-of-way under Florida Statutes. Rights-of-way shall mean a Right-of-way, easement, highway, street or alley owned by the City or in which the City holds a property interest and exercises rights of management or control, and includes the surface, the air space over the surface and the area below the surface of all public roads, streets, highways, alleys, boulevards, bridges, and tunnels.' This term does not include parks, open space and other public lands not designated for utility use. This term includes any privately owned area within the City which has not yet become a public street but is a proposed public street on any subdivision map approved by the City. Any portion of driveways located in or on a Right-of-way shall be considered a part of that Right-of- way. Technically impossible shall mean that the facility will not function as required if placed underground. Telecommunications Service Provider shall mean any provider who transmits, conveys, 'or routes voice, data, audio, video, or any other information or signals, including cable services, to a point, or between or among points, by or through any electronic, radio, satellite, cable, optical, microwave, or other medium or method now in existence or hereafter devised, regardless of the protocol used for such transmission or conveyance. The term does not include: Ordinance 46637-00 Internet access service, electronic mail service, electronic bulletin board service, or similar on-fine computer services provided by and through a cable service provider holding a franchise with the City. Any Utility that provides any of the above-mentioned services for use only by its employees or contractors who construct facilities for that Utility. in the Rights-of- way. Trench shall mean an opening in or along the Rights-of-way that is dug for the purpose of placing wires, cables, or pipes in the Rights-of-way. Utility shall mean any telecommunications service provider, electric utility, or other utility provider not owned by the City, and any contractor hired by any of the aforementioned. Utility Service shall mean any service provided by a utility to the persons within the corporate limits of the City, including, but not limited to, electric service, cable service, local and long distance telephone service, fiber optic service, and Internet service provided through means other than telephone lines. Sec. 28.93. Permit Required. Prior to any construction, except that construction which qualifies for an Annual General Permit or is an emergency, the Utility shall proceed with due diligence to obtain all necessary permits and authorizations which are required in the conduct of its business, including, but not limited to, any utility joint use attachment agreements, conduit use agreements, microwave carrier licenses, and any other permits, licenses and authorizations to be granted by duly constituted regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the operation of the particular type of Utility service that the Utility provides. A Utility shall not begin any construction prior to the procurement of the necessary permits. No person shall begin any construction within any Rights-of-way without first obtaining a Rights-of-way Construction Permit or an Annual General Permit from the City. This requirement shall also apply to all contractors and/or Utilities performing work within the City's Rights-of-way. Such permits are in addition to any other approvals that may be required. Construction in the Rights-of-way without a permit is expressly allowed in the event of an emergency. (1) Annual General Permit A Utility shall apply for an Annual General Permit no later than November 1 of each year, and the effective dates of that permit shall be from January 1 until December 31 of the subsequent year. A Utility Annual General Permit shall be L} Ordinance 46637-00 required of • Utilities existing within the Rights-of-way prior to January 1 of the effective year of the permit for the following activities: (a) Telecommunications service providers - new customer service: 1.' installation of service drops from serving location; 2. installation of a new buried distribution cable that does not cross or begin in the pavement; 3. extension of a buried distribution cable that does not cross or begin in the pavement; 4. extension of two-way four inch conduit system that does not cross or begin in the pavement; 5. adding a new terminal to existing cable; 6. pulling in new underground feeder cables in on existing permitted conduit or manhole and conduit system; 7. digging of a splice hole to splice a new cable or adding a terminal; 8. digging of a splice hole for cable acceptance testing for quality; 9. digging of a splice hole to change the count of a cable leg for new service; and 10. extension of existing aerial distribution cable from existing poles providing other aerial utility service still exists and providing it does not cross the pavement. (b) Telecommunications service providers - maintenance of existing Facilities: 1. replacement of existing service drops; 2. replacement/ repair of existing terminals; 3. replacement/ repair of existing aerial cable providing other aerial utility service still exists and providing it does not cross the pavement; 4. replacement/ repair of existing underground feeder cable in an existing permitted manhole and conduit system; 5 Ordinance 116637-00 5. pumping water . out of a manhole to maintain underground cables in conduit system; 6. digging of splice holes to locate and repair air leaks in cables; 7. digging of a splice hole to change the count of a cable; 8. digging of a splice hole to add a side leg off feeder cable; 9. digging of a hole to repair broken conduits; 10. digging of a splice hole for cable acceptance testing for quality; 11. digging of a splice hole to repair wet or damaged cable; 12. digging of a hole to verify the location of buried facilities; 13. removal of facilities no longer needed for services; 14. adjust aerial facilities to meet National Electric Safety Code; and 15. any facility relocations required for City improvements. (c) Cable service providers and Electric Utilities: . 1. routine maintenance of equipment, including, but not limited to, poles, overheadlunderground transformers, streetlights and brackets, wire and cable. (aerial or underground), pedestals, switches, arresters, risers, fuses and all associated hardware; .2. installation of equipment in order to provide new customer service, providing it does not cross the pavement; 3. extend and/or replace existing facilities parallel to the Rights-of-way, provided it does not cross pavement; 4. replace, repair, or upgrade existing facilities, provided it does not cross pavement; 5. retire services and mains; 6 Ordinance 06637--00 fi. install monitoring devices as necessary; 7.', perform field inspections for conditions and locations of electric facilities; 8. perform miscellaneous minor maintenance related work; 9, install electric facilities in existing casing/pipe-or conduit system; 10. removal of facilities no longer needed for service, 11. adjust aerial facilities to meet National Electric Safety Code; and 12. any facility relocations required for City improvements. (d) A Utility operating under an Annual General Permit should provide the ' City staff with weekly locations and schedule of construction in the Rights-of-way. If a Utility is operating under an Annual General Permit and the Construction is not on a provided weekly map and schedule, the Utility must notify the City staff at least 24 hours before commencement of such construction. The City staff shall also be notified within 24 hours of completion of construction in the Rights-of-way pursuant to this subsection. (e) A Utility must submit the following to obtain an Annual General Permit: 1. name and address of the Utility; 2. a generalized maintenance of traffic control plan and erosion control plan; 3. either proof of a valid franchise or valid registration with the City, pursuant to Chapter 32, Code of Ordinances, or a letter from the City Manager skating that the Utility is expressly permitted by the City to operate within the Rights-of-way without a franchise or registration; and 4, any other information as the City Staff shall find reasonably necessary to the determination of whether a permit should be issued hereunder. 7 Ordinance 06637-00 (f) A Utility engaging in construction in the Rights-of-way under an Annual General Permit is subject to the construction specifications in Section 28.95. Rights-of-way construction permit (a) Unless operating under an Annual General Permit or in the case of an emergency, a Utility shall obtain a Rights-of-way Construction permit prior to any construction in the Rights-of- way. The permit application shall contain at the minimum the following information: 1. the addresses of the properties located at the termination points of the proposed work area; 2. Name and address of the party doing the work; 3. Name and address of the party requesting the work, if the work is not to be performed by the Utility; 4. Location of the work area, including right-of-way and pavement width; 5. a site map for the construction detailing the existing conditions, including but not limited to existing utilities, and the proposers work; 5. a maintenanc ; of traffic plan; 7. an erosion control plan; 8. a tree survey showing all protected trees impacted by the proposed work; 9. a proposed timetable which contains a detailed description of each phase of construction; 10. unless operating under an Annual General Permit, proof of a valid franchise or valid registration with the City, or a letter from the City Manager stating that the Utility is expressly permitted by the City to operate within the Rights-of-way without a franchise or registration; and 8 Ordinance #6637-00 (b) (c) (d) (e) (0 (g) 11. any other information as the City Staff shall find reasonably necessary to assure adherence to construction specifications contained in Section 28.95. Any plans submitted shall not unreasonably or unnecessarily conflict with, create access difficulty, or otherwise adversely affect the City's use and Construction of any of its utilities. The City shall, within five working days of receipt of a completed application, issue a decision regarding a permit request. If the permit is not issued, the City shall provide the Utility with reasons-why the permit was not issued. The Utility shall have three days to dare the defects in their application for a permit for construction in the Rights-of-way, and if the defects are cured, the City shall approve the scheduled construction. If the Utility does not cure the defects in its application for permit, the City shall deny the issuance of the permit. The Utility may reapply for a permit at any time after a final denial.. if a Utility wishes to challenge the denial of a permit, the Utif ity may submit a request for appeal to the City Manager no later than thirty days after final denial of the permit. The C ity Manager shall reader a decision on the appeal within ten days after submission of the appeal. If the Utility wishes to challenge the denial of a permit by the City Manager, the Utility may submit a notice of appeal to the City Commission no later than thirty days after the denial of the permit, The City Commission shall hear the appeal at the next scheduled regular meeting of the Commission. The City Commission shall 'render a decision on the appeal in writing within ten days after hearing the appeal. The decision of the City Commission shall be final. A Utility shall contact the City Public Works Field Inspections Division at least 48 hours before construction will begin. Commencement of construction shall take place as soon as possible after issuance of a permit by the City, but not later than five days after Florida One-call line location, as required by Chapter 556, Florida Statutes. If construction of an approved plan is not commenced within three months of the issuance of the necessary permit or a shorter time to be determined by the City Staff for good cause, unless the Utility provides good cause in writing for the delay, it. is presumed that the Utility failed to proceed expeditiously, and the City Staff shall revoke the subject permit. 4 Ordinance H6637-00 ¦ ' (h) Within 24 hours after completion of construction in the Rights-of- way, the Utility shall notify the City Staff of completion . via facsimile or via telephone. After notification is received, the permit issued automatically expires, provided that the site has been restored. (3) Permit Fees (a) Each application for an Annual General Permit or a Rights-of- way Construction Permit shall be accompanied by a fee as set out in Appendix A to this Code, established by resolution by the City' Commission, to cover the cost of processing the application. (b) Telecommunications service providers are exempt from this fee. If Laws of Fla. 2000-260 is repealed, Telecommunications service providers shall be subject to this fee as if Laws of Fla. 2000-260 had never been passed. (c) A Utility possessing a franchise with the City on the effective date of this Section, is exempt from this fee. Any Utility negotiating with the City for a franchise after the effective date of this Section shall have the ability to be exempt from the permit fee it the franchise fee represents the maximum fee allowed by law for use of the Right-of-way or if the franchise states that the franchise fee represents full or total compensation for the use and occupation of the Right-of-way. Sec. 28.94. Emergencies. If an Emergency arises, a Utility may repair any Facilities affected without obtaining the usual necessary permits. If a Utility begins any Construction in the Rights-of-way due to an Emergency, the Utility or its designee shall notify the City staff within 24 hours. A Utility engaging in emergency construction in the Rights-of-way is subject to the construction specifications in Section 28.95. Sec. 28.95. Construction Specifications. (1) All construction of any facilities in the Rights-of-way by any Utility shall be performed in an orderly and professional manner. (2) The City reserves the right to limit the work of the Utility to assure a minimum of inconvenience to the traveling public and the citizens living and/or working in the area. 10 Ordinance U6637-00 (3) Unless state or federal .law ,or a state or federal agency with jurisdiction over the Utility require otherwise, the City may request that a Utility locate its facilities within a specific portion of the Rights-of-way, so long as the request is reasonable and not technically or economically impossible. (4) - If any Utility seeks to place any new facilities in the Rights-of-Way, those facilities shall be placed underground; unless federal or state law or a federal or state agency preempt the City's right to require the Utility to place. facilities underground or unless it is technically or economically impossible to do so. .: (6) . Conduits shall be stacked or bundled so as to occupy as little space as ' possible in the Rights-of-way. (6) Except as otherwise provided by state or federal law or a state or federal agency with jurisdiction over the Utility, poles that meet the definition of new facilities shall not be placed in the Rights-of-Way by a Utility. (7) If any underground facilities are to be constructed under pavement in the Right-of-way, the Utility constructing said facilities shall use a boring technique. If boring is economically or technically impossible, the Utility may seek approval from the City Staff to cut any pavement or excavate . in order to construct facilities, Pavement shall not be cut unless no other reasonable construction alternative is available and no alternative exists as to the desired route that will'avoid the cutting of the pavement. (8) If there is an active plan to resurface any Right-of-way within twelve months, a Utility may cut the pavement of a Right-of-way despite the provisions of subparagraph (7). (9) Prior to the commencement of any construction, the Utility shall obtain all required permits from the city engineering, building, or other appropriate departments prior to any construction being performed in the City's Rights-of-way. Permits will be issued to a Utility or its qualified contractors only on approved plans, which shall be submitted on or before the request for construction permit. All work shall be done in accordance with the City's specifications. (10) . The City reserves the right to require relocation and construction of such portions of the Utility's Facilities as public safety may dictate. (11) A City Public Works Inspector shall be present at various times during construction of facilities in order to assure compliance with any permits or approvals issued. The Utility and/or its contractor is responsible for safety and is required to meet all Federal, State, and local construction standards. Ordinance 06637-00 s .' 'f f (12) At all.times, at least one individual ? performing construction on facilities shall speak English, (13) If any terminals, cross-connect boxes, pedestals, junction boxes.or other : like facilities are to be placed in the Rights-of-way, they shall be placed as close Jo the property dines of adjacent private property as possible, Unless otherwise required by state or federal law or state or federal agency, and unless technically or economically impossible, all new construction of terminals, cross-connect boxes, pedestals, junction boxes or other like facilities shall be placed at or below grade. The smallest and least obtrusive terminals, cross-connect boxes, pedestals, junction boxes or other like facilities shall be exclusively used. (14) ' Storm sewer inlets shall be protected from siltation at all times. (15) Following construction all disturbed areas must be stabilized with sod, grass, mulch or other means approved by City staff. (16) Soil stockpiles to remain for more than 24 hours must be protected by measures which prevent wind or water erosion. (17) When work is adjacent to surface water bodies or wetlands silt fences must be provided. (18) If a Utility seeks to permanently or temporarily remove any greenery from the Rights-of-way, the Utility seeking to remove the greenery shall consult with . the City's Public Services Department. (19) Any permanent removal of greenery from Rights-of-way or public land is specifically prohibited unless it is necessary. Permanent removal of greenery is presumed unnecessary and specific facts regarding the necessity of removal shall be provided to the Public Services Department. For purposes of this subparagraph, necessity shall mean that the wires or cables cannot pass clearly without any branches or roots touching them and that the branches or roots threatening to touch the wires or cables are major structural branches or roots that may cause a safety hazard or the death of the tree if removed. (20) If any Utility seeks to temporarily remove greenery from Rights-of-way or public lands to install underground facilities or otherwise construct facilities, the Utility shall submit a plan to the Public Services Department that proposes to restore the disturbed area to its previous state, or as close as possible to its previous state. If the plan is acceptable, the Utility may remove the greenery and restore the area according to its plans. If the plan is unacceptable, the Public Services Department shall state the defects in the plan within thirty days of the proposed construction. If the Utility resubmits a plan for restoration 12 Ordinance #6637-00 fl correcting the defects, the Public Services Department shall approve the plan, unless the City has inappropriately applied its requirements. (21) ' If any Utility finds it necessary to trim or remove trees or greenery in the Rights-of way or on public land in order to avoid contact between wires or cables and branches, the Utility shall notify the Urban Forestry Division at least 48 hours prior to the proposed trimming. At the option of the City, the greenery may be trimmed either by the'City at the expense and under the supervision of the Utility or by the Utility under the supervision of the City. When authorized, trimming of greenery shall be limited to the area required for clear cable passage and shall not include major structural branches which materially alter the appearance and natural growth habits of the tree. Any greenery may not be trimmed in a manner that would be in violation of Article 3 of the Clearwater Community Development Code. The Utility shall be responsible for any and all damages to any greenery as a result of trimming or to the land surrounding any tree or greenery. (22) The requirements for barricading, root pruning, and proper pruning of protected trees, as contained in Article 3 of the Clearwater Community Development Code, apply to all construction covered by this section. Sec. 28.96. Collocation and Cooperation (1) Whenever possible, all Utilities shall occupy one trench, unless technically or economically impossible. If a Utility cannot occupy the same trench, that Utility shall create. a new trench into which all Utilities thereafter installed shall collocate unless technically or economically impossible or until there is no space remaining for any additional Utilities. (2) Unless technically impossible, a telecommunications service provider shall install its facilities within an existing conduit, if space is available in an existing conduit and agreeable terms can be reached between the owner of the conduit and the telecommunications service provider seeking to enter into the conduit. The owner of a conduit may reserve inner ducts and conduits for future use, and if the only available space is a conduit reserved for future use or inner ducts reserved for future use, it is deemed that there is no space in the existing conduit, If there is no space in an existing conduit, a telecommunications service provider may construct a new conduit or direct bury its facilities within an existing trench, as provided in subsection (1). 3) A Utility shall install its facilities simultaneously with other Utilities whenever possible. The Utility shall notify in writing all other Utilities currently located in a portion of the Rights-of-way that a Utility has submitted an application for a Right-of-way Construction Permit. 13 Ordinance 46637-00 Sec. 28.97, Damage or Injury caused by Utility In the event that a Utility, during construction of facilities under any of the permits issued pursuant to this Section or during an Emergency, negligently or intentionally causes damage to pavement, sidewalks, driveways, facilities owned by the City, facilities owned by other Utilities, or other property, public or private, the Utility shall notify the City and the owner of the damaged property, if not the City, within 24 hours of such damage. The Utility which caused the damage or its authorized agent shall, at its own expense and in a manner approved by the City, replace and restore such places to the same condition which existed before said work was commenced within a reasonable time period acceptable to the City staff. If the owner of the damaged property requests that said owner repair the damage caused by the Utility, and repairs the damage in a reasonable time period acceptable to City staff, the Utility shall reimburse the owner for.the reasonable cost and labor of repairs resulting from the damage, The Utility shall further maintain all such restoration in the condition approved by the City for a period of one year following such restoration. If, during Construction of a Utility's Facilities by the Utility, a claim arises against the Utility and/or the City as a result of the Utility's negligent or intentional acts, the Utility will hold harmless and defend the City against all claims, pursuant to Chapter 337, F.S. The City may require a Utility to present proof of insurance prior to the commencement of Construction in the Rights-of-way. Sec. 28.98. Relocation required if requested. (1) If the City finds it necessary to perform construction in or on the Rights-of- way, and any Utility's facilities are located in such a manner as to prevent access to, construction of, maintenance of, or expansion of, the Rights-of-way, the City may require any Utility to remove and/or relocate its facilities at the Utility's own expense. (2) The City shall notify all affected Utilities in writing at least sixty days prior to Construction. The City shall require the Utilities to respond within ten days of receipt of the notice, stating the amount of time, in days, the Utilities estimate it will require to remove or relocate their facilities. Depending on the scope of the project, the City may grant additional time to the Utilities to respond to the notice. (3) If any facilities are removed or relocated pursuant to this paragraph, the Utility shall comply with this Section, except that the Utility will not need to apply for a permit. (4) In-place, out of service utilities remain the responsibility of the Utility and are subject to the requirements of this sub-section. 14 Ordinance 116637-00 .:. ?:. . v ' ! i E'f. a •, i I ., 1 'i RyewlNll, •.Y?, ] 1;.. ., 11?+r1: :.5 '+: E`f'+.d 'rr i..,. .. eti ll F.i .f a... .e.... .•'!.., .. .... ... c a.! .. Sec.'28.99. Applicability to other Code sections. The provisions of this ordinance supersede conflicting or overlapping provisions corlitained-' in the Clearwater Code of Ordinances and such conflicting or overlapping provisions are hereby, repealed. Section 2., This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J:,'Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: ' Jane Haym Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk M, 15 Ordinance 96637-00 R r_k PW Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item 4- Meeting Date: 1-31 Originating Dept: Costs; Public Works Administration SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve Agreement with Tampa Bay Water (TBW) concerning reimbursement of funding for preliminary engineering for advanced water treatment facilities in cooperation with the City in the amount of $270,000 and approve McKim & Creed Work Order for Engineering Services providing concurrent studies and technical oversight of the advanced water treatment project in the amount of $369,000, ® and that the appropriate officials he authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Tampa Bay Water (TBW) has expressed an interest in developing a water treatment facility in cooperation with Clearwater. TBW and the City are engaged in negotiations to enable TBW to construct advanced water treatment facilities on City property conjunctive with improvements to the City well field to achieve an increase in water production in one year. TRW is requesting City cooperation to achieve a 2-million gallons per day (mgd) increase over the current City water production of 3-mgd by September 2001 to offset regional demand. The City was previously considering upgrades to water production facilities to meet forthcoming Safe Drinking Water Act regulations by December 2003. TBW has,offered to accelerate City plans by funding early delivery of the project. ¦ The McKim & Creed work involves technical oversight of TBW's technical efforts, coordination of public information plans, conducting corrosion studies and providing engineering services to change the City's disinfection system. The change in disinfection is required due to County plans to change their disinfection process anticipated by November 2001. Of the total cost of $369,000, $161,000 is applicable to the TBW effort. ¦ TBW has contracted with Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc., (CDM) to conduct preliminary engineering over the next two months addressing project scope and cost issues. At the conclusion of this period, a basis of design report shall be provided to determine project feasibility. At that time, the City will have the opportunity to assess the project and decide weather or not to move forward with it. The total cost for the CDM effort is $700,836. The City's reimbursable portion is $270,000 based sharing the cost with TBW for both the CDM and McKim & Creed work ($700,83612 - $161,00012 m $269,918 (rounded to $270,000). The City will provide reimbursement of $270,000 to TBW only in the event that TBW and the City do not enter into an agreement to construct a water treatment plan. Reviewed by: Legal Info Tech NA Budget Public Works .?^ Purchasing DCM/ACM Risk Mgmt NA Other PC&M - i--?r Submitted by: City 14tanat;cr? Printed on recycled paper User Dept. A?,' Public Utilities/Waler/Andy Neff Attachments Tampa Bay Wager Agreement 1IcKim & C=nd 14ork Order M. None Funding Source: Total cipliat X Improvement UtKritina other Current Fiscal Year Appropriation Code: 315-96740-561300-539-000 Rev. 21911 :.5=.' - ;fir 1 S .. • The City will be updating the Water and Sewer Rate Study concurrently with this project and will bring ' forward this analysis with rate recommendations. The last rate study assumed that we would be purchasing, all 'water from Pinellas County (at the then $1.7911000 gallons), that we would be issuing'bonds for capital projects (did not include this project) and resulted in annual 6.6% increases in each of the following 5 years, The first 6.6% increase was approved affective 711100, It is anticipated that the commission will need to approve a series of'rate adjustments In order to Issue bonds for this project (if pursued) as well as other planned projects. ¦ Sufficient funding for the City's $539,000 share of the effort is available In the water supply and treatment CT (315-96750), ¦ Copies of the TBW agreement and the McKim &•Creed work order are available in the City Clerk x Department. If 2 COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES This Cooperative Funding Agreement for Engineering Services ["Agreement"] is entered into this day of 2000, between the City of Clearwater, Florida, a municipal corporation ["CITY"] and Tampa Bay Water, A Regional Water Supply Authority, an interlocal governmental agency created and existing pursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 373.1962, 373.1963, and 163.01 ["TBW"]. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City wishes to assist TBW in increasing the local supply and reducing demand on regional sources by renovating certain facilities of the City's water system; WHEREAS, CITY and TBW desire to explore the feasibility of construction of a water treatment plant on certain real property owned by CITY known as Reservoir No. 1 and associated wellflelds ("Property"], and TBW has engaged the services of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ["CDM"j to perform certain engineering work on said project, as described further in an Agreement for Professional Services between TBW and CDM approved by the TBW Board October 16, 2000 contingent upon certain concurrences from the Clearwater City Commission, and accordingly the CITY desires to participate in funding such engineering services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and the covenants and agreements set forth, below, which each of the Parties acknowledges and agrees is good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by all Parties, CITY and TBW agree as follows: 1. Tampa Bay Water shall assure cooperation of CDM with the City's consulting and staff engineers in assessment of the proposed project. The City shall timely notify Tampa Bay Water of any lack of cooperation, and Tamp Bay Water shall promptly take whatever action is necessary to assure full cooperation. 2. - The City agrees to reimburse TBW an amount of up to two hundred seventy thousand dollars ($270,000), said sum not to exceed forty percent of the total amount of payment for work to be performed by CDM under that Agreement for Professional Services approved by the TBW Board on October 16, 2000, with attachments ["CDM Agreement"], subject to the following conditions: a. The City agrees to pay the above amount only upon receipt of written notice by TBW received by City on or before September 30, 2001 that TBW will not execute any lease, license, or facility purchase agreement concerning the Property; and b. TBW shall provide CITY with copies of all interim, status, and final reports produced by CDM, all technical data and working papers regarding CDM's services, and all analyses, data, document, models, modeling, reports and tests performed or utilized by CDM and made available to TBW under the Agreement for Professional Services referred to above, and shall assure cooperation of CDM with CITY's consulting and staff engineers in assessment of the proposed project. 3. This Agreement shall be effective as of the last date upon which all of the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. Page 1 of 2 4. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties with respect to the activities contemplated by this Agreement. All prior agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, are superseded. This Agreement may be amended only by a written document duly executed by the partles. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any action arising under this Agreement shall.lie in Pinellas County, Florida. KWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have.hereunto set their hands and seals as of the date first above written. Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney TBW: ATTEST: BY: Jerry, L. Maxwell, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: Donald D. Conn, General Counsel By: William B. Horne, II Interim City Manager Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Tampa Bay Water, A Regional Water Supply Authority BY: David J. Fischer, Chairman Date Page 2 of 2 f 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT McKIM & CREED ENGINEERS WORK INITIATION FORM DATE: October 24, 2000 City Project No: M/C Project No: 1. PROJECT TITLE: Water Treatment System Improvements 2. SCOPE OF WORK: SUMMARY The City of Clearwater is cooperating with Tampa Bay Water for the development of expanded water supply from the City's weilfields. In order to expand the water supply, system improvements will be required including rehabilitation to the wells, expanded raw water piping and new water treatment facilities. The proposed improvements of Clearwater's existing water supply facilities will be constructed by Tampa Bay Water and later be purchased by the City. Numerous issues face the City with regards to the changes In its system and the potential Impacts to the City customers. These range from financial Impacts, operational impacts and water quality changes. This work assignment Includes providing technical consulting, technical review and participation in the oversight of the design and construction of the proposed systems. The technical reviews will be intended to assist the City in evaluating the appropriateness of each project component and assist the City staff in planning for changes In the operation of the water system. In addition to the change in treatment techniques in the Reservoir No. 1 area, the City will need to address changes in disinfection processes it uses in the system. This changes Is due to changes'in water quality regulations and proposed changes by Pinellas County and Tampa Bay Water in the process used for disinfection. The City will be required to construct new disinfection facflites at Reservoir Nos. 2 and 3. This work assignment includes the design of these new systems. The conversion to new disinfection processes will likely cause changes to the taste and odor of the public water supply. Public notification will be a critical component in the success of this conversion. Task 3 of this Work Assignment addresses the public notification component. The scope of this work is outlined below. SCOPE OF WORK Task 1: Technical Review • Participate in project meetings to review and provide, input into the systems being proposed for improving and expanding the water supply system. • Review and comment on Project Scope as proposed by Tampa Bay Water. Assist in review of design and construction cost components. • Review TBW's proposed finished water quality criteria for the new treatment facility at Reservoir No. 1 and determine the suitability of finish water reiative'to the City's distribution system. Pw00280 CITY OFCLEARWATER October 24, 2000 Page'2' • Review TBW's Draft Basis of Design Report. Review proposed treatment process, system components and system sizing proposed for the treatment facility. Provide comments on suitability of proposed systems and recommend any changes that are deemed appropriate. • Review water quality and quantity of process reject water from proposed Reservoir No. 1 treatment facility as will be outlined in Tampa Bay Water's Basis of Design Report, Evaluate potential impacts to the Marshall Street APC Facility. Evaluate hydraulic impacts on the treatment process and permit requirements. Evaluate expected blended water quality on the reclaimed water usage, • TBW intends to enter into a contract for the design and construction of the new treatment facility. The City will have opportunity to evaluate various equipment selections. McKim & Creed will assist the City in the review of equipment proposals for the treatment facility. • Upon completion of the new treatment facility, performance testing will be conducted by Tampa Bay Water. McKim & Creed will review water quality data and operational testing data to determine compliance with specified target water quality and performance standards. • Review City's Bond Covenants with respect to the proposed lease of water supply facilities to TBW. Prepare Engineers Certification for release of facilities for the improvements project. • Assist the City in preparing a request for funding of project costs from the Water Management District, Attend pre-application meetings with District Staff. Prepare application documentation as needed to support submittal. Attend follow-up meetings with District staff and Pinellas-Anclote Basin Board. Task 2: Distribution System Impacts • Perform a hydraulic modeling analysis to assess the impacts to system piping. Review flow direction and velocity changes within the distribution system resulting from increased production. Highlight the areas and/or percentages of areas subject to flow reversal and/or significant velocity and pressure changes. • Evaluate the change in rate of withdrawal for specific Pinellas County Interconnects, Le.: Belcher at Belleair, Belcher at Gulf to Bay, US 19 at Reservoir No. 2 and at Reservoir No. 3. • Develop criteria for time based water quality assessment in the distribution system. + Based on criteria established, conduct hydraulic modeling to traci< travel times In the distribution system. Correlate travel times to water quality degradation, specifically to disinfectant chemistry. Identify expected critical areas as it relates to travel time in the distribution system. Evaluate potential improvements in the system that could reduce water quality based problems. • Using the hydraulic model, determine the expected interface zones of membrane treated water and water to be received from the existing groundwater sources. CJTY OF CLE'r1RWATER - October 24, 2000 Page 3 Review the documents prepared on behalf of Tampa Bay Water regarding expected blends of various water sources. Develop estimates of water quality ranges to be expected for Pinellas County for the current system configuration. Further develop expected water quality ranges from the blends of water from Clearwater groundwater and Pinellas County water. Evaluate these water quality parameters to the proposed water quality expected from the Reservoir No. 1 Treatment Facility. Review the expected impacts of the blend of these sources with the distribution system. • Establish a pilot program for evaluation of impacts of chloramine and membrane treated water on the City distribution system. Establish testing protocol, sampling program and system configuration. • Assist the City in set up of pilot test system. The City will be requested to provide pipe segments that it wishes to evaluate, provide specified pilot equipment selected by the engineer and provide labor for installation and operation of the pilot system. The City will also be requested to provide sampling and testing during the pilot operation. Periodically monitor the performance of the system. Monitor sampling and testing during the course of testing. • Analyze test results of the pilot program and provide recommendations on pH control,, corrosion control and disinfection processes. The results of this work will also be utilized in the Basis of Design for modifications to Reservoir Nos. 2 and 3. Task 3: Public Relations Assistance • Conduct planning sessions.with the City staff to identify and develop the requirements for a comprehensive public relations program regarding proposed changes in water treatment methodologies. • Develop public relations strategies and plans for communications with the residents and customers of the City of Clearwater. Coordinate the plan with the City technical and public relations staff. • Conduct up to four (4) public meetings to present information related to the changes being implemented with respect to water treatment and disinfection processes. Prepare presentations for these public meetings. • Design a project specific web page that will provide targeted information to the public regarding the water quality changes and impacts. • Develop literature for notification of dialysis patients and health care facilities regarding changes in disinfection process. • Develop plan for targeting and communicating the water quality changes being planned. Assist in implementation of the communications strategy. Contact key health care agencies to identify best methods of public outreach to insure effective communication of water quality changes being implemented. 41 Execute mailings/contacts with the identified groups, individuals, facilities and agencies to communicate the changes in system water quality. CITY OIL CLEARWATER - October 24.2000 Page 4 Participate in C-View public Information messages to the residents. We anticipate that City C-View production staff will assist in preparing productions of video messages and or public information spots. Task 4: Chloramines Design Phase Conduct a project kick-off meeting with the City to review the requirements of the project and to outline the proposed improvements. Y Conduct topographic surveys of each treatment area at the two ground storage reservoir sites. • Coordinate design and implementation of new disinfection process with the changes proposed by Tampa Bay Water and Pinellas County. o Evaluate the requirements for disinfection and chemical feed systems including development of the design criteria for system sizing, location, layout, storage requirements, control system modifications and associated site improvements. Prepare a brief Basis of Design Report to outline project parameters. This Basis of Design Report will also address the future treatment needs at Reservoir Nos. 2 & 3 with respect to pending arsenic rule and proposed impact on water quallty expected from the proposed TBW project. An outline of proposed treatment requirements (such as membrane processes) will be provided in the report but are not included in the design services under this Work Order. • Meet with the City to review the Draft Basis of Design Report and Incorporate City comments into the design of the systems. • Prepare design of new chemical feed systems at Reservoirs 2 and 3 including chemical storage system, chemical feed pumps, and piping systems. Prepare design of chemical building to house new equipment for ammonia systems. • Prepare electrical system modifications to incorporate new chemical systems. Provide instrumentation and control systems design, HMI and PLC programming for the facility upgrades. Design site improvements to incorporate new building or modified building for housing the new systems. Prepare progress design documents for review by the City at the 60%, 90% and 100% complete stages of the project. Provide estimates of probable construction costs for the proposed improvements to be submitted with each progress submittal. 0 Meet with City staff to review the progress on the project and to receive comments on the design documents. o CITY OF CLEARW ATER - October 24, 2000 Page 5 • Prepare applications and submit on behalf of the City for environmental permits for the project including SWFWMD and FDEP as applicable. Meet with City DRC and Building Inspections to review project and to Incorporate any comments regarding project design. Permit fees will be the responsibility of the City. • Prepare Contract documents for the construction of the project using the City Standard Contract forms including General Conditions. Prepare bid forms and Supplemental Conditions for the project. Task 5: Chloramines Bidding Phase • Prepare Contract documents and provide copies to the City for review and use in bidding the project, • Respond to questions concerning this project and prepare addenda as necessary. • Issue clarifications to the contract documents and issue addenda as required. • Review bids received and make a recommendation for award of the contracts. Prepare draft Agenda Cover Memorandum. Task 6: Chloramines Construction Services • Coordinate and conduct the pre-construction conference with the selected Contractor and City staff to review project requirements, coordination, and scheduling issues. • Provide technical review of shop drawings and other contractor submittals for compliance with the Contract Documents. McKim & Creed's Project Administrator will coordinate review process, ' • Coordinate and attend monthly progress meetings with the Contractor and the City to review project status and facilitate coordination of activities. Maintain minutes of meetings and distribute to the attendees. • Provide part-time construction review to observe the construction work relating to the design requirements. Assist in coordination of and communication of construction activities involving appropriate persons, Maintain reports of daily activities for the project record and provide copies to the City. • Review Contractors requests for payment, compare request with work completed, verify accuracy and recommend appropriate action by the City. • Make periodic site visits by the design engineers and project manager to observe the work in progress and the quality of the various systems and facilities with the respect to their intended function and Contract requirements. • •1 CITY OF CLEARWATER - October 24, 2000 Page 6 • Provide general contract administration} Includin§ interpretations of the Contract Documents, review of progress schedules, general correspondence with the Contractors and suppliers, review of changed conditions, and changes in the work required, and preparation of monthly status updates for the City. • Prepare intermediate and final punch lists for the Contractor to complete and/or correct items that are required by the Contract Documents. Follow-up to ascertain that the Contractor has satisfactorily completed items. • Assist in start-up of systems and components. Perform modifications to the plant SCADA system to implement the changes to the disinfection system. • Perform final inspection of completed work and prepare the Engineers Certification for submittal to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Pinellas County Health, and SWFWMD upon satisfactory completion of the project. • Prepare as-built drawings of improvements based on Contractor supplied marked-up drawings showing any deviation from the construction drawings. Provide electronic and printed copies of Record Drawings to the City. • Assist in collecting and submitting contract closeout documents including as-builts, release of liens, warranties, manuals, closeout change order, and other required documents. 3. PROJECT GOALS -WORK PRODUCTS: • Review comments on system proposals by Tampa Bay Water and their Consultant + Evaluation of reject water quality and the expected impact on the Marshall Street APC Facility + Disinfection Basis of Design Report. • Plans for disinfection system conversion at Reservoir Nos. 2 & 3 including progress drawings at the 60%, 90% and 100% phases. • Public Relations Plan • Water Quality Literature for Public Information • Brief report and data for water distribution system model evaluations for hydraulic and water quality based system impacts • Recommendations on disinfection system changes and corrosion control adjustments. 4. BUDGET McKim & Creed will provide the services outlined herein for Tasks 1, 2, 3 and 6 on an hourly basis in accordance with the Continuing Professional Services Contract. The estimated fees for each of the tasks outlined below. Tasks 4 and 5 will be provided on a lump sum basis. Task 1: Technical Review $59,OOQ.00 Task 2: Distribution System Impacts $73,000.00 Task 3: Public Relations Assistance $29,000.00 Subtotal $161,000.00 ., lu CITY OF CLEARWATER October 24, 2000 . Page 7 ' Task 4: Chloramines Design Phase $137,000.00 Task 5: Chloramines Bidding Phase $6,000.00' Task 6: Chloramines Construction Phase 165,000.00 Subtotal $208,000.00 Total $369,000.00 5. SCHEDULE This project schedule will be in accordance with the schedule of project implementation to be set by Tampa Bay Water for the Reservoir #1 Water Treatment Plant Improvements. It is expected that the project will be completed, tested and ready for purchase by the City of Clearwater within 18 months. The' work under this agreement will continue through acceptance of operational testing of the proposed system improvements. Tasks 2 and 3 will require completion prior to plant start-up, which is expected to occur on or before December 2001. Task 3 will be scheduled for completion on or before April 1, 2001. Construction of chemical systems at Reservoir Nos. 2 & 3 would be completed at the time of completion of Reservoir No 9 Improvements or at the time of completion of disinfection system conversion by Pinellas County. 6. STAFF ASSIGNMENTS: City: Kevin Becotte, Andy Neff McKim & Creed: Street Lee, Bob Elefritz, Dan Cote, Linda Faulkner-Vaughn, Emilie Moore 7. CORRESPONDENCEIREPORTING PROCEDURES: All McKim & Creed Correspondence shall be directed to Street Lee. All City correspondence shall be directed to Andy Neff, 8. INVOICING/FUNDING PROCEDURES: Please invoice monthly for work performed as detailed in McKim & Creed Continuing Contract. Charge this work to City Code No: 9. ENGINEER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify as a licensed Professional Engineer, registered in accordance with Florida Statute 471, that the above project's site andlor construction plans meet or exceed all applicable design criteria specified by City municipal ordinance, State, and Federal established standards. I understand that it is my responsibility as the project's Professional Engineer to perform a quality assurance review and these submitted plans to ensure that such plans are .0 ': ' is . i' . , s • .. - 4' :Fr''•?`q.f. ?iLri:"S•''a±'????..,r'a`k.#)!i'if'',?. ?•Y!Y••.1+'•.o...t e rt's•' .'•^....,'w ., ._.r.. .. x ., .. .... r , .. :.1 , ... •, CITY OF CLEARWATER October 24, 2000 Page' 8 i free from errors and/or omissions, Further, I,accept that the City's Final Inspection for a Certificate of Occupancy does not relieve me of my own quality assurance review. I hereby certify that all facilities have been built substantially in accordance with the approved permit design plans and that any substantial deviations (described in attachment) will not prevent the system from functioning incompliance with the requirements of applicable regulatory authority. This certification shall apply equally to any further revision and/or submittal of plans, computations, or other project documents that I may subsequently tender, 10. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None PREPARED BY: ` CITY:, McKim & Creed: Michael D. Quillen, PE A. Street Lee, PE City Engineer Vice President 31 During our recent meetings with the Commissioners, some additional questions were raised. Please convey the following responses to the Commissioners for the Thursday night Commission meeting: 1.. Why are tho costs different today Vs previous years? The costs for membrane treatment have been reduced. In the 1998 McKim & Creed report, a cost of $12M for a 4-mgd freshwater membrane plant was discussed. This cost was based on $2.50/gallon ($2.50 x 4,000,000= $10M) plus 20% contingency (well rehab, etc.). No engineering fees were included. To convert this cost to the plant proposed by TBW, we need to convert this cost to 3,1 -mgd. For 3.1-mgd: 0 $2.50 x 3,100,000=$7,750,000. • $7,750,000 + $900,000 (well rehab) + $1,000,000 (engineering)= $9,650,000. 2. Would It be more efficient to put the same $8.2114 Into reclaimed water? Although Mr. Heath from SWFWMD indicated the District believes the difference between potable water projects,and reclaimed water projects is negligible from a regional perspective, our experience Is different. Based on our current review of the Reclaimed Water Master Plan, $8.2M roughly equates to a potable offset of 0.7-mgd. This Is based on lawn meter readings (for customers who have lawn meters) and a 25% irrigation use for those who have only domestic meters. This compares to $8.2M yielding roughly a 1.7-mgd gain for new water production on the TBW proposal. 3. Would it be more cost effective to send our raw water to Dunedin and have It treated there and returned to us? It would cost ab6ut $8.9M (including engineering and contingency) to put In place the needed piping (raw watersupply and finished water return plus concentrate disposal), membrane and filter capacity increase (needed to peak flows), pumping, telemetry and well rehabs (still needed to support increased production). Annual costs are undetermined and would be based on reaching an agreement with Dunedin on the applicable costs and charges they would desire to apply. Based on the capital costs and the future dependency on Dunedin, it appears this option is more expensive and would provide some unknowns, making it less appealing. 4. What other options has the City reviewed? In the 1998 McKim & Creed report, the City considered. • freshwater membranes • brackish water RO • reclaimed to potable (treat reclaimed water to potable standards) • purchase of the total supply from Pinellas County. • surface water in the 2000 McKim & Creed report, options included. • selling our system to TBW to support their plans • providing freshwater membrane treatment ourselves • surface water treatment In various combinations The most cost effective treatment was membrane treatment of the freshwater source - the current proposal under consideration. 5. What was the cost of Pinellas County water In 19813? $0.9611000 gallons 6. Does our City code require water conservation devices? The City code has no specific requirements, however the standard plumbing code requires water conserving devices in bathrooms. If you have any questions or wish to receive this in a different format, please let me know. i?P !`'j?.i ??' r. ,'s..ir ?' i} ''w•f".•'+6er,??'? IhF: t .'..4a' c. , wr; E r5 ;..ir} ? w . ?t . t '_{'. .: ? 1•.{ rl ,' 1' . :,1? ? ? j',.. ' l?yQr;?J••A? e ikt?n; I T Y O F L E A R W A T E R ?;??; '• , ?`y? PosT OFFICE Box 4745, Clr??Inc'ATEH, i"I0111bA 33758.4788 MUNICIPAL SEMCE5 BUILDING 100 5o[mI M itnx, AvENUE, CLmHwATritr•IAHIDA 33756 '?+•.ie AS w i f Tani Ion (813) 562.4747 ENVIRONMENTAL Amsow BoAHn To: ry Goudeau, City Clerk Prom: ler, Assistant Director of PD&E/Engineering CC: e, Interim City Manager; Garry Brumback, Assistant City Manager; Mahshid Arasteh, Public Works Administrator; Mike Quillen, City Engineer; Kevin Becotte, Public Services Director Date: November 16, 2000 RE: November 15, 2000 Environmental Advisory Board meeting Last evening the Environmental Advisory Board convened and considered the subject of the potable water treatment feasibility study. That agreement is on the Commission agenda for this evening. Please see that the City Commission is notified of the EAB's action to: • Recommend that the City Commission approve the agreement with Tampa Bay Water to conduct preliminary engineering for a water treatment plant at reservoir #1. This action was duly motioned, seconded and unanimously approved. In addition the EAB also motioned, seconded and unanimously approved that staff set a joint special meeting with the City Commission to be convened at the City of Dunedin Reverse Osmosis plant at Dunedin's earliest convenience. The purpose for this meeting was expressed as informational to better.assist the City of Clearwater in its decision for reverse osmosis water treatment. Thank you for your prompt attention to this EAB action. 0 "EQUAL I:.1U TON-MINT AND Af.-rimimm" AnioY E.Nll'I.(fYE:H" ' Marriott Hotels, Resorts & Suites - For Getaways 1 ter. ?lr aore19' and Suites Page 1 of 1 lti?.?!'?taooab t Marriott Resorts 0 Plan a Getaway 0 Make a Reservation tit ROOM 320. WAM-S i-o A ever?+hi%a. AA +ta?kl%g o* ot11. Marriott Resorts. Looking for adventure or a relaxing getaway? Consult our list of more than 30 spectacular Marriott Resorts in dream destinations all over the world. Plan a Getaway. What's your idea of the perfect vacation? Use our getaway planner to design it. Find weekend excitement in New York, New Orleans or your other favorite city; our Two For Breakfast and Can't Beat Friday rates are sure to revive your spirits. Have a whole week to spend on pure pleasure? Imagine a scarlet sunset illuminating an island paradise. A sea of green fairway in a palm-dotted desert. All with candlelit dining, lively lounges, sparkling pools, recreational options, and the languid luxury of room service. Click here to order a free Marriott Vacations Brochure Ip Marriott Rewards 0 Travel Links @ Make a Rewrvalion l299 Ma -g- iii Hotels Reso s an Suites http://www.maniotthotels,com/getaway/default.asp O? 11/16/00 Pik A Marriott Hotels and smites Pagel of 2 ??J0~AX= 1+Jo+rlAwi??iirCr:}'dr?r Marriott accommodates you at your most traveled-to destinations. In addition to our resort locations, Marri ott hotels are in major citles, bustling business centers and airport. locations In the U.S. and around the worl d. Argentina Panama USA (continued) Aryla Peru • Kansas Australia PbLiip Ines . Kentucky Austria Poland a Louisiana 'Bahamas Puerto Rico Canada Qatar a Maine Cayman-Islands Romania . Maryland Chile Russia • Massachusetts Chtm Saudi Arabia • Michigan Costa Rica Singapore . Minnesota Curacao South Korea a Missouri Czech Republic Spain Ecuador Switzerland • Nebraska E9yot Thailand a Nevada El Salvador United Arab Emirates a New Hampshire France United Kingdom a New Jersey Germany US Virgin Islands a New Mexico Greece USA a New York Guatemala a Alabama • North Carolina Hungary • Alaska • Ohio India Israel • Arizona . Oklahoma Italy • California a Oregon Japan • Colorado a Pennsylvania Jordan * Connecticut . Rhode Island Lebanon • District of Columbia • . South Carolina Malays a Florida Mexico • Georgia @ Tennessee Netherlands • Texas Pakista • .Hawaii • Utah • Illinois • Viminia • Indiana a Washington • Iowa • West Viroinla • Wisconsin AlL?2?Le?t39 200Q Mardolt Irde?nsi41.4oIl1, Inc. IRIO?mL4 m http://www.martiottliotels.cotWmarriott/tocfindex.asp 11/16/00 Mar...: reservations for business and leisure travel at 2000 hotels, resorts, and inns worldwid Page 1 of 1 9i1 QI?4 e.-2?Q9h?afi?3S ?lg4tP?i14r1a1_?9[ID?9L4144I l4Qmet.F YaGy-ta!Qmgr4 Y z eMrim.Reatwtion I Find.a-HoW Hotel rotes a milability. City (e.g., Chkago, Clkck here to book now. QO?rtinl) er t+aT1Cq[ iteirYtiena _---? State (e.g., Hawail) Bahl DIr+L wry/ Florida Over 2000 hotels and resorts worldwide from Amman to Zurich. Country (e.g., USA, l For man sesroh options, clok hoe. i - ? ? " ? 'i?llia? lwsh W Baslt;w • Amenities and Services • High peed Internet Access • Business By Brand • Dedicated Mooing Facilities J Golf Tee Time Take a goH vacation. `vacation Resort Locations Kick back in style. Membership Is free, join tech PlaklHimmoo1s Explore some of the v+orld s r ckias with iMlarrkA as your he from the pull-lawn menu bah Select a Destinatioi ? MAP FINDER ? ROUTE PLANNER ? VACATION PLANNER . ? EVENT PLANNER Online mervati just gat easierl This site is best viewed In 4.0 or higher level browsers. Ir you are experiencing problems navigating the site, please use the $.qo map. littp:H%v%vN,?,.inarriott.com/honie.asp 11/16/00 a J Marriott Feature Search ` Searle ,Resents 0a110i, The following hotels are in the area you specified. Residence Inn Orlando-Altamonte Altamonte Springs . Springs, FL S Hill Suites Orlandol Altamonte Altamonte Springs Springs, FL Courtyard Aventura Mall Aventura, FL Boca Raton Marriott Boca Raton, FL Courtyard Boca Raton Boca Baton, FL Residence Inn Boca Raton Boca Raton, FL SpiingHill Suites Boca Raton Boca Raton, FL TownePlace Suites Boca Raton Boca Raton, FL Cou and Saint Clearwater, FL PetersburgiClegrwater Fairfield Inn St. Pete ! Clearwater Clearwater, FL Residence Inn St Petersbur - Clearwater, FL Clearwater TownePlace Suites St_. Petersburg! Clearwater, FL Clearwater Residence Inn Miami - Coconut Grove Coconut Grove, FL Courtyardoral Springs Coral Springs, Fl. dngHI I Suites Ft. Lauderdale S Dania Beach, FL _ Delrav Beach Marriott Cou ard. Ft Lauderdale East Cou and NpAtjjQypress Creek Delray Beach, FL Fort Lauderdale, FL Fort Lauderdale, FL http:/Iwww.marriott.com/search/SimplePropertySearch.asp ,our Paget of 6 -R ? _.,.Rosr?rwig?? - _Rs •,- c aFr. -Romrldbi+cs?` _lAossrvttkns ` ..._R?aetbr+s`. ?Rsw tioiar ._Rorsticras . ._Rs?atlans _.ae? '.rton. _R? lions _.Ross?otiorta ?R;? tlo,es ?Rr?rvstions" ._Rejerrr'otfons -Rsae?rv aons 11/16/00 Marriott Feature Search Page 2 of 6 FL Fort Lauderdale Marina Marriott Fort Lauderdale, FL _ Fort Lauderdale Marriott North Fort Lauderdale, " FL Harbor Beach Marriatt Resort Fort Lauderdale, f.° - - - -- - FL Mardott's BeachPlace Towers, Fort Lauderdale, FL TownePlace Suites Ft. Lauderdale/ Fort Lauderdale, West FL Courtyard Fort- Myers Fort Myers, FL .?,.' Fairfield Inn Ft Myers Fort Myers, FL Residence-Inn Fort Myers Fort Myers, FL .? Courtyard Gainesville Gainesville, FL Fairfield Inn Gainesville Gainesville, FL . Residence Inn Gainesville Gainesville, FL Courtyard Orlando North Heathrow, FL Courtyard -Miami Lakes Hialeah, FL _Ae Hutchinson Island Marriott Beach Hutchinson Resort and Marina Island, FL Courtyard Jacksonville Airport Jacksonville, FL Cou and Jacksonville Butler Blvd. Jacksonville, FL Cou and Mayo Clinic Jacksonville & Jacksonville, FL Beaches Area Fairfield Inn Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL Fairfield Inn Jacksonville Airport Jacksonville, FL Jacksonville Marriott Jacksonville, FL Residence Inn Deerwoodl Butler Jacksonville, FL ?R..?tfvns Blvd. Residence Inn Jacksonville Airport Jacksonville, FL Residence Inn Jacksonville- Jacksonville, FL Baymeadows SpringHill Suites Jacksonville/ Jacksonville, FL _.n . , ©eerwood quLty ard_Hutchinson Island Jensen Beach, FL Fairfield Inn & Suites Jupiter Jupiter, FL .. A.'nsNons http://www.marriott.conVsearch/SimplePropertySearcii.asp 11/16/00 e ,o i Marriott Feature Search S Page 3 of 6 Key Largo ?Bay Marriott Beach Resort Key Largo, FL Couftard Key West/ Baple?w Key West, FL Fairfield Inn Key West Key West, FL Courtyard Lake Buena Vises Vista Lake Buena ??• Centre Vista, FL Courtyard LBV_at_Wait Disnpy Lake Buena Vista, FL Coward Lakeland Lakeland, FL MardoWs Longgboat Bay Club Longboat Key, ;sY FL Marco Island Marriott Resort & Golf Marco Island, FL Club Couftard_Melbourne Melbourne, FL ?e - Biscayne Bay Marriott Hotel & Marina Miami, FL Courtyard Miami Airport South Miami, FL .?? Courtyard Miami Airport West Miami, FL Fairfield Inn Miami A3rportlSouth Miami, FL Fairfield Inn Miami West Miami, FL JW Marriott Miami Miami, FL Miami _Airport Marriott Miami, FL Miami Marriott Dadeland Hotel Miami, FL Residence Inn_Miami Airport Miami, FL _. R The Eden Roc Resort & Spa A Miami, FL . _R.atdo? Renaissance Resort TownePlace Suites Airport West Miami, FL Miami Beach Marriott at South Beach Miami Beach, FL _R, iak" TownePlace Suites Miami Lakes Miami Lakes, FL ._.R.rrona Cou and Naples Naples, FL Residence Inn Naples Naples, FL ???cio?ar Courtyard Tam a North North Tampa, FL _RalMiri?atbea Courtyard Ocala Ocala, FL Fairfield Inn Ocala Ocala, FL _news" Fairfield Inn Orange Park Orange Park, FL _.._,R.m"km, Cou and at UCF Orlando East Orlando, FL _ _R?rJorar Courtyard _Mamott Village Orlando, FL _Rr ?e?amr http:llwww.inaniott.coWsearch/SimplePropertySearch.asp 11/16/00 ,, • Marriott Feature Search Page 5 of 6 Fairfield Inn Pensacola Pensacola, FL Residence Inn Pensacola Downtown Pensacola, FL Residence Inn Pensacola-University Pensacola, FL Mail Cou and Ft. Lauderdale/Plantation Plantation, FL -a+at'raa Residence Inn Plantation Plantation, FL Sawgrass_Marriott Resort Ponte Vedra Beach, FL SringHill Suites Port St. Lucie West Port St. Lucie, FL S_pringHill_Suites _North Orlando Town Sanford, FL Center Courtyard Sarasota Bradenton Sarasota, FL Residence Inn Sarasota/Bradenton Sarasota, FL The World Golf-Village- A St. Augustine, FL Renaissance Resort Renaissance Vinoy_Resort and Golf St. Petersburg, Club FL CoyM and Tallahassee Tallahassee, FL Cou and Tallahassee/ North Tallahassee, FL " iron, Fairfield Inn Tallahassee North Tallahassee, FL Residence Inn Tallahassee Tallahassee, FL _a,atio TownePlace Suites Tallahassee Tallahassee, FL Cou and Tama Brandon Tampa, FL Courtyard Tampa Downtown Tampa, FL Courtyard Tampa Westshore Tampa, FL MAP Fairfield Inn Tampa Brandon Tampa, FL Residence Inn Tampa Brandon Sabal Tampa, FL Pk Tampa Airport Marriott Tampa, FL Tampa Marriott Waterside Tampa, FL -axi okstio , Tampa Marriott Westshore Tampa, FL -RossVatims TownePlace Suites Tampa North Tampa, FL Fairfield Inn Tampa North_TSmple Temple Terrace, Terrace FL ._._Ra? Hans http://tvww.ma tTiott. con/search/SimplePropertySearch.asp 11/16/00 tl ? ? ! ' , : ? i ?'? i ? ?t? •?,. 'rhe;•`.;ge+,;1.?XEti?•1?1J rc+st`iYT e y. r>Y: ?: I V} .?fa . r: [{ItY?Se !' i a ^L ' C •SI , 4 ?? '? ' i ? ? r r I i . . .,r ....... ,.. . , ri+ .T .. ., r-.+. .I FF f. wrw •.. .. I . : a • , ? ,.. .. ..r .... . .. ' . ' Marriott Feature Search Page b of 6 E FL Cou and West Palm Beach West Palm -1-, Beacht FL I Faldleld Inn Weat Palm Beach West Palm Beach, FL ? Residence Inn West Palm -Beach - - West Palm f Beach,'FL Fairfield Inn Winter Park i Winter Park, FL , , I http://www.maniott.corWsearch/SimplePropertySearch.''asp r ` I ! 11/16/00 3q RESOLUTION NO. 00-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, DECLARING THOSE NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 95- 70 AND AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AS SATISFIED AND RELEASED; PROVIDING FOR A COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO BE FORWARDED TO THE PROPERTY' APPRAISER, TAX COLLECTOR, AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 197.3632(3)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES;. PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater has heretofore established the City of Clearwater Special Assessment District No. 95-01 (the "District") and levied such special assessments (the "Assessments") by Resolution No. 95-70 dated September 7, 1995, and recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, in Official Record Book 9193, Pages 1717 thru 1767; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has collected payment for those assessments more particularly described in Exhibit A, and desires to satisfy and release said assessments described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater directs the City Clerk to provide copies of this resolution to the property appraiser, tax collector, and the Florida Department of Revenue; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission of the City of Clearwater hereby releases as satisfied said assessments for those properties more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. RETURN TO: City Clerk Dept. City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33578-474B Resolution No,00-46 I? Sec ion 2. The City Commission of the City of Clearwater hereby directs the City Clerk to provide copies of this Resolution to the property appraiser, tax collector, and the Florida Department of Revenue. Section 3. All resolutions or parts of this resolution in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. If any clause, section, or other part of the application of this Resolution is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, in part or application, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Resolution. Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2QQ0. Approved as to form: John Carassas Assistant City Attorney 2 Brian Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Resolution No.00-46 f v . Off Rec. ®k, #9193 / Pg. 11717 thru 1767 Fully Released Liens Cit of Clearwater _ Sand Ke Power Line Burial I Resolution 95-70 ^- -- - Lien Release I p mts Received-May 1 1999 thru September 30, 2000 Record Assessment Balance No Parcel Number ( Property Owner Name ( Lien Amount ( Due 1 191291 15 / 00000 / 140/0300 Beach communities 11 Inc t 2,489.54 ' - 2 191291 15 / 000001 140/0500 Abdullaj, Amza D & Neim B ^3,941.14. 31 19129 / 15/00000 / 14010800 Beach Communities It Inc 829.85 r y - 4 191291 151 12936/002/ Miller, James R. & Loretta A. 501.93 - 5 19 / 29 / 151 12936/0021 1402 Mirabelli, Frank & Laura 391.06 - G 19 1 29 / 15 1 16526 / 000 1 0701 Holzmeister, Eurydice E & Victor E 448.11 - 7 19 / 29 / 15 116526 1 000 1 0904 Drake, Ann L & Durlene J 368.82 - a 19 / 29 1 15 1 18791 1 000 10503 Spanos, Kevin 357.70 - 9 191291.15 1 18791 1 000 10705 D'Amato, Roger I 611.35 - 10 191291 15 /187911000 / 0803 Zimmermann, Fritz R & Deborah J 363.08 - 11 191291 151 18791 /000/0806 Carroll, Michael A & Albert 516.79 - 12 19 / 291 15 / 18791 /000/1502 Woyslaw, Tadeusz & Barbara I 532.06 - 13 19129/15/187911000/1606 Frasca, Monica Tre 53_6.73_: - _- 14 191291 151 18793 000 0206 Calanzaro, Jon J I 525.61 - 1s 19 1 29 1 15 1 18793 1 000 / 0901 Hatton, James G. & Arlene M. 1,065.20 - 16 19129 / 151 18793/000/ 1105 Attar, Laila 685.26 - 17 191291 151 18793/000/ 1406 Santagulda, Domenico & Raffaela 584.80 - 1a 19 / 29 1 15 / 187931 000 115041 Buglioli, Louis P & Glenda S 695.31 - 19 191291 15 / 36699 1002 / 6020 Giere, Thomas A & Shirley F 349.4 5 20 19 1 29 1 15 136699 / 999 1 1090 _ Schwartz, Dorothy S 30.50 - - 21 191291 15151762100010701 Flogaites, Theodore N & Nancy A 679.88 - 22 19129/15155303100010270 Crist, James G & Grass, Sharon D t 727.60 - 23 191291 15/55303 / 000/0340 Strong, Charles D & Kathleen P 823.03 - 24 191291 15155303100010480 Vale, Robert K & Jane A 700.33 - 25 191291 15/55303 / 000/0580 -f- -? 649 38 Cook, Darren L 26 191291 15 / 78630 / 000 10308 _ Oudyk, Laurie J & Stewart, Robert ( 362.72 - 27 191291 15 / 78630 / 000/0311 Linker, Irwin & Serafina ( 35139 - 26 19 1 29 1 15 1 78630 1 000 1 0809 Friedberg, Mitchell R & Beverlee i 419.41 - 29 19 / 29115 178634 / 001 / 20170 Goldbronn, Doreen M 405.77 30 31 191291 15 / 78637100010106 191291 15178637100010108 Trinkl_e, William E. & Elizabeth E. 345.50 Talty, Angie L -- - 334.02 L -- I - 32 191291 15 / 78637 / 000 / 0201 Morehead, Alberta J 428.38 - 33 191291 15178637100010310 Perez, Benito L & Vilma M I 389.99 - 34 191291 15/78637 ! 00010504 Colton, Stephen T 471.43 - 35 36 191291 15 / 78637 / 000/0610 191291 15 / 78637 000 10907 Aughton, Brian & Gillian 1 _ 412.23 Von Schottenstein, L Tre & L Tr f 4;3 - -- - - 37 19/29115/78637/000/1011 _ Dunn, Thomas P --419.41 , - 38 191291 15/78638 / 000/4040 Kantzler, George W & Elizabeth { 333,30 1 39 191291 15 / 78638100014080 Thacker, Catherine P I 609.20 - 40 19/29115178639/ 00014090 Schlessman, Berneita E & Rolland 389.99 - 41 191291 151786391000 / 7030 Darby, Richard & Constance 352.32 - 42 19 1291 15178643100010307 Hennigan, Michael W 491.86 - 43 191291 15/93390 / 00010302 1Eighan, Michael J & Duckworth, Diane 911,65 1 - 44 191291 15/93390 / 000/0504 Browne, Lucille E 570.45 45 19129115193390100010902 Grenci, Peter & Mary L WI 938.91' - 46 191291 15 / 93390 / 0001 1104 Sennett, William R 587.67 - 47 191291 151933901888 / 0070 Grenci, Peter & Mary L T I 30.50 - 48 19 1 29 1 15 / 93390 1 888 ! 0090 Eighan, Michael J & Duckworth, Diane 30 50 - 49 191291 15193391 1000 / 0202 Meder, Donald C. & Schuyier S. I 952,19 i - 5a 19 1 29 / 15193391 1 000 1 0406 Warren, Joseph F & Alice M 652.97 - 51 19129 / 15/93391 / 00010501 Daly, Michael J & Audreyann 924.56 , - Prepared by: City of Clearwater Finance Dept. 10/24100 Page 1 of 2 N 3y M, Off, Rec. Bk. #91931 Pg. 1717 thru 1767 Fully Released Liens _ City of Clearwater _ Sand KeyPower Line Burial 1 Resolution 95-70 Lien Release 1 Pymts Received May 1, 1999 thru September 30, 2x00 rRecord Assessment Balance _ No. Parcel Number Property Owner Name Lien Amount Due 52 191291.15 1 93391 1 000 1 0905 Bozue, Charles H & Linda A 416.541 - 53 191291 15/93391 10001 1507 Weaver, Joseph W & Carol V ? 719.70 54 191291 15/93391 10001 1603 Jordan, Richard D & Rosetta 626,42 1 - 55 191291 15193391 188810230 Daly, Michael J & Audreyann 30.50 - so 19 1 29 1 15 1 93391 1 888 1 0240 Meder, Donald C. & Schuyler S. 30.50 - 57 191291 15/933911888 0680 Jordan, Richard D & Rosetta 30.50 - so 19 1 29 1 15 193391 1 888 1 0740 Warren, Joseph F & Ake M 30.50 - 59 19 129 115 193391 / 888/0750 Weaver, Joseph W & Carol V 30.50 - sQ 20 1 29 1 15149851 1 000 1 0708 Tucci, Joseph & Alleen H 367.74 - 61 20129115 149851 10001 1007 Mc Clenaghan, Andrew & Vera 362.00 02 20129115 / 49851 /000/1104 Mohamadi, Masoud 312.13 - 63 201291 15/49851 10001 1206 Aldonis, Sotirios & Peter 374.56 - 54 20 / 29115 149851 10001 1508 Artale, Alfred & Debra 379.94 - 65 201291 15/49851 / 0001 1701 Wirtanen, George W & Virginia B 383.53 - 66 20129115 / 49852 / 000 10701 Sheehan, Michael F 494.39 - 67 201291 151 73427 1000 / 0010 Shoppes Assoc LTD PTNSHP 14,583.48 - ss 30 1 29 1 15 1 20262 1 000 1 0702 Folino, John F Tre 508.38 - 69 30129115120262100010903 Patterson, James O & Mary M 527.04 ?^ 70 301291 1512026210001 1015 Mancuso, Anthony J & Joyce A 694,23 - 71 301291 15 / 20262/000/ 1107, Peters, Rita 04.44 , -_ 72 301291 15143515100010803 Gademsky, Leonard C & Joyce 8 331.51 73 301291 15158920100010010 Marden Enterprises Inc ' 222.44 » 74 301291 15158920100010270 Marden Enterprises Inc 222.44 - 75 30 / 291 15158920100010370 Marden Enterprises Inc I 222.44 ?_ - 7& 30 / 291 15 158920 1000 10420 Marden Enterprises Inc ' 222.44 - 77 301291 15158920100010430 Marden Enterprises Inc ` 222.44 ; - 78 301291 151 58920100010560 Moorings Sand Key Dev Corp 222.44 ^ - 79 222.44 301291 151 58920100010650 Marden Enterprises Inc ' - Tora! 55,26929 - Prepared by: City of Clearwater Finance Dept, 10/24/00 Page 2 of 2 _.Irrri CITY co'%islISSIO., C ITY-OF ?GLEARWATER POST OM 'CH Box 4748; CI.FARWATER, FLORIDA 33758.4748 CnY HALL, 112 $otmI 05CEo A AvriwF, CLEARWATliR, FLORIDA 33756 'rrmpito\E9 (727) 562-4050 F x (727) 562-4052 November, 16, 2000 Mr. William Hybl President Unites! States Olympic Committee One Olympic Plaia Colorado springs, CO 80909 Dear Mr. Hybl: It is exciting to be included in the process of an Olympic bid for Florida 2012. It is with great enthusiasm that the City of Clearwater supports this Olympic venture. We loop foi-ward to playing our part in the successful selection of Florida as the location of the XXXth Olympiad. In support of Chapter S of the bid document, the City commits not to sponsor a major event during the June 15 -July 1, 2012 time frame.. Vie look forward to working with our partnerships toward this historic undertaking and hope that with all of us working together we can accomplish the goal cif hosting the YYYth Olympiad in the State of Florida. Sincerely, Brian J. Aungst Mayor BRIAN J. AUNGSr, ,MAN'OR•COMMISSIOSFR i , J.Il. jolmos, VEG[i MAYOR-COMMISSIONER {loll CIARK, COMMISSIONER Ell I IARr, COw11Iss1Q\CR m I) WX)IT1+, C0\1%tI5St01'TR "I;Q11M. I:atrl.aYMli1 I' AEI) tI11 IS1JEi541'['11'ti {IG7'I()N I:MI'I.QS'I:R'? r? 3 5 1I NOV. 13.2060- ?=1?S4EM?J ?!??'IDR 201E f 13 2000 I pw'ff 'AT ?'?' ? lei ? ?° I FLORIDA NO.F-Q1 P. 1/1 TO: Ma or Aun s Carol n Brink FROM: Josh H, Rodri uez Jennlfer Dake FAX: 2 562-4052 FAX: 813 221-8787 DATE: 11 13 DO PHONE: 813 221.4268 RE: PAGES: 1 includin cover COMMENTS: Mayor Aungst, Thank you for your help in securing a letter of support from he City of Clearwater. The letter needs to state that the City of Clear ater will not take on a major event during the proposed period of the lympic Games, June 15, 2012 through July 1, 20123 should Florida 2 12 be awarded the ?(th Olympiad. As l"discussed with your assiS ant we would need to have this letter by Friday. Please address it to: Mr. William Hybl?l ?? President is c.? ?? ??- ? S Q1? 1 a o United States Olympic Committee ?,,, `tom. -??-t-?'?"'' One Olympic Plaza 1`?c Colorado Springs, CO 80909 c7 Please feel free to call with any questions. My cell phone nu ber is (813) 335-4737 or direct line at the office (813) 204-2142. Jose"Nennifer Tampa Office: Ono MacwCnli Bu-lding -501 bast Kunnapy 3lvd Sulie 575 rarrpo, Pcnda 33602 rat, 313.22 t•4M F.?_: p13.221•8>B7 Orlando Office: OtIM1.1v 01V Hall. Stn PM •100 S VAh Or111G,2 JWOnWO Cdt"1a r ? as J2sC1 ...I..t;7.s-5..1: e7 ?. an ?,n-G ' .-F ell j11 i!•?l al 1 ' jt• r •` 1 ? e r 5 , .t.1 ? .. '1 ?'? r. ' , ,' ? .I [ h ?` yr r'" i ' :?``: ?? r.LL•t4 kj1 (+.,. ._4,.,,1 r ,Y; off' 1'? ?- .fr ti?¢{d kya?:{:g?et • y °tii}?r,? ?????': -' t`rfY'•`S 4?'ti •,`:s,` ,? . .,,a? ?ta:.'•.,.?[I ?, 1,J, . •.r,. . ?? r .t?•=. "?' - .. .. ? , +a?.::_ ti,11,? .$jt;Yg?1 t?Sy` `{?J r{r;;?1y .''i?_.??sl:s?.:r1r! +fi:r.?{?1?i. ??.??53'+". .s= .i?[S?° " ?-f° :;t?.• •:xtj' ;??. :.f'., ,,,,.f,,,.V i • .err .,I, t?. ,??r. ?w,l r}. '??ft Jr..7 .:> G':4' ka't r 7r'???•1y'"?"r'tltf^.t ?t?' „i.r ?`I? ,sc, .:i.l tr..J,•. .t k`s4', ?"?}., :!, ,.?. .t,'µ"• °. (, r[3?, k. +?.' •:±`3e. r.: '? 1:. i•. ??°? ':7:-j? .,I=_?, _ I..;a 7: ;' ,'t i?.:l,,t ` r r7. 1?? •'t t<.'?r ,?: 1. ? .1 .; r:?,, '1••?:. .. :t 1 ,.? - are ii.a ems. da Worlooc s es''s i*on. . .t 885 PRELIMINARY AGENDA Clearwater City Commission Worksession - Monday, November 13, 2000 following closed bargaining session beginning at 9:00 A.M. Service Awards Motivational Mentor Award Convene as Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA): 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes: 9115100 3. Request Commission award contract to Dames & Moore, additional soil remediation, 901-927 Cleveland Street (Parcel B) owned by CRA, $89,500 4. Consider & make recommendation to City Commission re PSTA request to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density and Medium/High Residential Districts to Public/Government Category re 100 N. Greenwood Ave. to allow construction of a bus terminal 5. Executive Director (Assistant City Manager) Verbal Reports 6. Other Business 7. Adjourn Convene as Pension Trustees: 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes: 10/16/00 3. Request for acceptance into membership: Jennifer Howard, Scott McGraii, Richard Martin, Patricia Rooks, Brian Craig, Ronald Rice, Joseph Smith, Christine Parker, & Paul Burger 4, Regular Pension(s) to be granted: Donn Githens & Patrick Adamson 5. Pension{s} to be vested: Dolores Hofer 6. Previous Pension Contributions to be allowed: Birgitt Dowd, Lawrence Dowd, Mark Goheen, Alphonso Hinson, & Carol Harvey 7. Accept Actuary's Report for Employees' Pension Plan for plan year beginning 111100 8. Agreement with Christiansen & Dehner, P.A., legal services for Trustees & PAC, 10/1 /00- 9/30/01 9. Other Business 10. Adjourn Reconvene Worksession PRESENTATIONS 1. Gehring & Kimpton - parking garage PUR PURCHASING 1. Smith Fence Company, 2nd & Final renewal, fencing installed, 12/l/00-11/30/01, est. $125,000 (PR) 2. Jeffrey Knight Inc., 1 st renewal of 2, gas mains & service lines installation, 1 / 1101-12/31101, est. $ 585,000 (GAS) 3. Duval Ford, twenty 2001 Ford Crown Victoria police pursuit vehicles, replacements, $491,885; financing to be provided under City's Master Lease-Purchase Agreement (GS) 4. Bell Chevrolet, one 2001 Chevrolet Express 15 passenger van, replacement, $21,460; financing to be provided under City's Master Lease-Purchase Agreement (GS) 5. Verizon Florida, Inc., high bandwidth service, 11/17/00-9130/01, est. $85,000 (IT) S r i E 11/13/00 1 ED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Contract to Dames & Moore, additional soil remediation, 901-927 Cleveland Street (Parcel B) owned by CRA, $89,500 (Consent) HR HUMAN RESOURCES 1 Agreement with FOP Supervisors for Fiscal Years 2000-2001, 2001-2002, & 2002-2003 r IT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1. Non-Exclusive License Agreement with Nextei South Corp., authorizing installation of telecommunications equipment upon West Water Tank, 1780 Weston Dr., for initial term of 5 years commencing within 180 days of full execution of license agreement, granting Licensee option to extend for up to 3 additional terms of 5 years each, providing initial annual rent of $27,500 payable the 1 st of the month following commencement date, adjustable annually a maximum of 4% in conformity with CPI (Consent) LIB LIBRARY 1. Authorize extension of Countryside Library operating hours to include Sundays from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., beginning January 2001 (Consent) 2. Agreement with McNaughton Book Service, book leasing, not to exceed $17,037.30 (Consent) I MR MARINE 1. Contract to GLE Construction Services, Inc., new airplane T-Hangars at Clearwater Airpark, $596,021.35; authorize 5 year loan from Central Insurance Fund at cash pool rate in the amount of $298,011 PD POLICE 1. Agreement with YWCA of Tampa Bay, interpretation 1 translation services, part of Hispanic Services Outreach Program, 1!1101-9130101, est. $45,350 (Consent) PR PARKS AND RECREATION 1. Establish new CIP titled E.C. Moore Fields 8 & 9, to be included in City's CIP for Fiscal Year 2001-2002, for total est. $530,000 2. Contract to Eveland Brothers, Inc., expansion of Countryside Community Recreation Center, $464,640; approve subsequent Change Order deduct in the amount $12,670, for net contract amount $451,970 PW PUBLIC WORKS 1. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6600-00 - Vacating approx. 163' in length of a 30' wide unnamed r-o-w lying south of Druid Road, between Lake Ave. & Keystone Ave., subject to retaining westerly 10' as a drainage & utility easement (Van Raalte) 11/13/00 2 2: Staff recommendation for modifications to beach & downtown parking rates to be effective 1/1101 (WSO) 3. First Reading Ord. #6637-00 - creating new Art. IV of Ch. 28, providing regulations for users of City rights-of-way 4. (Cont. from 1112100) Agreement with Tampa Bay Water, reimbursement of funding for preliminary engineering for advanced water treatment facilities in cooperation with City, in the amount of $270,000; approve McKim & Creed Work Order for engineering services providing concurrent studies and technical oversight of advanced water treatment project, $369,000 PLD PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6614-00 & #6615-00 - Land Use Plan Amendment to Institutional & Institutional Zoning, 3070 Chesapeake Lane, Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 22.21 (City / First Baptist Church of Clearwater) 2. Public Hearing & First Reading Drds. #6616-00, #6617-00 & #6618-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban & LMDR Zoning, 2014 Poinsetta Ave., Brooklawn Sub., Blk 0, Lot 10 less E 5' for road r-o-w (Yanith Kheang / City) 3. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6619-00, #6620-00 & #6621-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low & LMDR Zoning, 1407 Nursery Rd., Suncrest Terrace, Lot 11 (Michael & Linda Biros) 4. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6622-00, #6623-00 & #6624-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low & LMDR Zoning, 1708 E. El Trinidad Dr., Virginia Grove Terrace, Blk 2, Lot 3 (Christine L. & Irma N. Thacker Est. / City) 5. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6625-00, #6626-00 & #6627-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Suburban & LDR Zoning, 1880 McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 4-29-16, M&B 32.04 (RIC Properties Limited / City) 6. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6628-00, #6629-00 & #6630.00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban & LMDR Zoning, 2071 Lantana Ave., Brooklawn Sub., Bik D, Lot 8 (James H. & Patricia C. Olson / City) 7. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6£31-00, #6632-00 & #6633-00 - Annexation (& redefining boundary lines of City to include said addition), Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential/Office Limited & Office Zoning, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 21.04 & 21.05 (Thomas Kelly & Michael A. Ciaramello) 8. Work Order to Wade-Trim Consulting, Engineer-of-Record, engineering & planning services for Enclave Annexation Program, $67,395 (Consent) CLK CITY CLERK 1. Pinellas Planning Council - Appoint a commissioner for the term 111101-12131102 11/13/00 3 CA LEGAL DEPARTMENT Second Reading Ordinances 1. Ord. #6634-00 - Relaying to investment of temporary surplus monies; amending Sec. 2,524 to provide for 'a change in the types of investments of City funds Resolutions 1. Res. #00-46 = Declaring those Non-Ad Valorem assessments established by Res. #95-70 as satisfied and released; providing for copy of this resolution to be forwarded to Property Appraiser, Tax Collector, and Florida Dept: of Revenue (re Sand Key) Other City Attorney Items 1. Approve expenditure of $300,000 to acquire 2 parcels on Spencer Avenue for stormwater retention project and to settle civil action in Winkelmann, et al. v. City City Manager Verbal Reports Commission Discussion Items 1. Charter Amendment a) Administrative Policies b) Internal Auditor Presentation(s) for Thursday Might 1. Award to Ramada Limited from Beautification Committee Other Commission Action 1. Filling vacancy in Seat 3 (11116/00) Adjourn 11/13/00 4 .i?,4 `+ i?,s1J e?,l3? E?'a?tii?;4k?r£ ?1???? r?S'P: t•? ? ???[ftt' , r, .. i , no e , RA e-nas ees agen a. packs '4 1 -ke' t sepalloatel F y } I it h _ Clearwater City Commission Worksesslon Item f1: Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item k Meeting Date: S U B j ECT/R E.COM M EN Dmil O N: Discuss staff recommendations for modifications to the Beach and Downtown parking rates to be effective January, 1, 2001; © and that the a ro riate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The parking system is a major land use with approximately 43.5 acres in off-street parking. • The parking system generates $3.4 Million annually. • Parking will have a significant influence on the redevelopment outcomes for the Beach and Downtown, specifically through the development of new parking garages. • Adjusting some of the current parking rates will enable the Parking System to use this additional revenue by reinvesting it back into the system through expansion projects. • The Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Section 30.094 authorizes the City Manager to designate parking rates throughout the City. Weekend /.Seasonal Rates - Beach o Current hourly rates are $.75, $1 and $1.50 depending-on location. o Adjust hourly rates for metered parking by $.25; and cashier parking by $.50 on Sat. & Sun only. • Adjust hourly rates for parking during the spring break season (March & April) by $.25 for metered parking and $.50 for cashier parking. Beach Employee Permit Rates • The current rates are $15 / month. The number of permits has escalated from 25 in 1998 to over 100 this year, all of which use prime beachfront parking spaces at this reduced rate. This results in a significant potential revenue loss. • A public meeting was held 10/10/00 to discuss modifications to the current program. The Beach Chamber and Sunsets at Pier 60 were represented as well as a few other businesses. • There was overall agreement that the current program does require some modification. Input on acceptable increases included raising rates to $651month in Feb. - May and $30/month for the remainder of the year, and to also increase the current Sunsets vendors' validations to half their nightly stay instead of a 2-hour validation.. • Staff contacted the major permit users not in attendance at the public meeting, to inform them of the subject recommendation. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs Legal N/A Info srvc NIA Public Works Admin./Parking Total NIA (Trace Bruch) Budget Public Works User Dept. Funding Source: Purchasing N/A DCM/ACM Public Works Admin./Parking Current FY GP Risk Mgmt NIA Other L-% Attachments OP Finance Parking Plan Beach & Other Downtown Submitted by: ? .? ? ]??? • p Noire City Manager A ro rialion Cade: Printed on recvcted naoer rt..w_ ?tan rk°°,?;lr'rl'•'.?fp.l.. ?fit: i?i .? ,i ., -• ..; Page 2 Modifications to Beach and Downtown Parking Plan Agenda Item Resident Permit Rates • The current program has been In place for 1 year. There' are 300 active permits, e Staff recommends adjusting annual rates from $25 to $50 with no other changes to the program. • Staff will solicit public input prior to final Commission approval of the rate Increase. Downtown Permit Rates • Current rates have not been adjusted for over 10 years. • Surface parking'is $15 / month and garage parking $351 month. Staff is recommending adjusting rates to $20 and $40, respectively. Meter rates will not be adjusted until there is further direction with the downtown plan. • Staff will solicit input from downtown permit users prior to final Commission approval of the rate increase. Summary Proposal Weekend & Seasonal Rates Beach Employee Permit Rates Resident Permit Rates Downtown Permit Rates Proiected Additional Annual Revenue $294,000 - $330,000 $ 221000 - $ 25,000 $, 6,000 - $ 81000 $ 131000 - $ 15,000 TOTAL , $335,000 - 378 000 2 H CLEARWATER PARKING SYSTEM Parking Plan - Beach & Downtown Introduction • The Parking System is a 39-year program. • Manages 4,200+ parking spaces. • Generates approximately $3,400,000 annually. Major Land Use (43.5 Acres) Parking System's Philosophy It is the philosophy of the Parking System to meet the public parking needs through safe, accessible, convenient and aesthetically pleasing facilities. Parking could have a significant influence on the redevelopment outcomes for the Beach and Downtown, specifically through development of new garages. The intent of the proposed rate adjustments is to generate additional parking revenue to help offset the costs of expanding the parking system through the construction of parking garages at the beach and downtown... Weekend Parking Rates 1 Seasonal Parking Rates: Weekend Rates -- Beach Parking • Increase rates for the beach on Weekends only (Sat. & Sun.) by $.251 hour. for metered parking and $.501 hour for cashier parking. • 30% - 40% of beach parking revenue is generated on Sat. & Sun. a Current hourly rates are $75 or $1 for metered parking and cashier parking rates are $1.501 Hour - daily maximum of $10. • The proposed adjustment will generate approximately $175,000 - $200,000 in additional annual revenue. Parking Syslcm Plan - Bench & Downtown October 16, 2000 E bid Seasonal Rates • Increase rates for the beach on a "seasonal" basis only by $.25 ! hour for metered parking and $.501 hour for cashier parking. • This adjustment would occur 60 days 1 year during March & April, Lots ! meters would be prominently posted with signs I decals detailing all rates. • Current hourly rates are $.75 or $1 for metered parking and cashier parking rates are $1.501 Hour - daily maximum of $10. • The proposed rate adjustment will generate approximately $170,000 - $185,000 in additional annual revenue. ¦.. Downtown Permit Parking Rates: Increase rates for downtown permit parking locations: Current Proposed Surface Lots $151 Month $201 Month (100 spaces) Garage $351 Month (+ tax) $401 Month (+ tax) (240 spaces) O Rates for surface lots have remained constant since 1987 and since 1990 for garage parking. • 'Average annual downtown permit revenue for surface lots and garage parking combined is $124,000. • The proposed rate adjustment will generate approximately $13,000 - $15,000 in additional annual revenue. Parking System Plan - Beach & Downtown October IG, 2000 2 i I I ., .t t Resident Permit Parking Program • Program began September 1, 1999 at the annual rate of $25 • Approximately 300 permits sold + The previous program was $96 annually and valid at the south beach parking lots. The number of active permits never exceeded 50. • Proposed rate increase to $50 annually with no other changes to the program. The proposed rate adjustment will generate approximately $6,000 - $8,000 in additional annual revenue. Beach Employee Permit Parking Program Program began in February, 1998 and was intended for businesses that had little or no designated employee parking. • $151 month. • Program grew from 25 -- 30 monthly permits to 50 permits in January, 2000. • March, 2000 -120 permits were issued. • 50% of the permit holders are vendors at Sunsets at Pier 60. Impact of Program: • Potential revenue loss is $10,000 - $12,000 per month. • Average length of stay for permit holders is 5.0 -- 5.5 hours. + Prime beach-front parking being used for employee parking. + Sharing / Abuse of permits noted. Parking System Plan - Beach & Downtown October Ib, 2000 3 i Staff Recommendations Presented at Public Meeting 10110100: • Standardize permit rate structure city-wide to the current 25-30% of hourly ; rates. • ' Validation program for employees where businesses participate at $.40 per ' hour. • Continue to offer the "Sunsets" vendors validation program, Input ! Recommendations from Public Meeting:' • Increase monthly rates up to $30. • Seasonal monthly rate of $65 (Feb. - May) and up to $301 month, for the remainder of year. • Increase the "Sunsets" vendors validations to half their nightly stay, approx. 2.5 hours, vs. 2.0 hours per night. Final Recommendation: 1. Adjust monthly rates to $65 during the season (February - May) and $30 all other months. This will reduce our liability of "potential lost revenue" by approximately one-third, assuming we lose some permit holders due to economics. Estimated additional annual revenue is $22,000 - $25,000. 2. Increase the Sunsets vendors' validations to half their nightly stay. This will help those vendors that only participate a few times per month and do not purchase permits. Parking System 111un - Beach & Downtown October 16, 2004 I.r . 0 . i Ski '.{,'•i .A'1. _.?;:?1 :;L; .7{.";?'4's !z '.. 1 o PROPOSED PARKING RATE ADJUSTMENTS i SUMMARY r PROPOSAL PROJECTED ADDL. REVENUE Weekend Parking Rates Only - Beach $175,000 - $200,000 ' Seasonal Parking Rates Only - Beach $170,000 - $185,000 r r Weekend & Seasonal Rates Combined Beach $294,000 - $329,500 F s t i Downtown Permit Program Rates $ 13,000 - $ 15,000 E . I , .. Resident Permit Program Rates $ 6,000 - $ B,000 Beach Employee Permit Program $ 22,000 - $ 25,000 GRAND TOTAL w/ Weekend Rates Only GRAND TOTAL wl Seasonal Rates Only GRAND TOTAL wl Weekend & Seasonal Rates Combined $216,000 - $248,000 $211,000 - $233,000 $335,000 - $377,500 5 Parking System Plan - Beach & Downtown October 16, 2000 I .a