Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
10/05/2000
r?'; .????'t'.,f,sYi +i?`s1 :4 •t . .s e.?. _ ??fft r' ,.i• ?a. 7 ? r. ?? ,T Si'+'',E?.7,!>il???al?frl,{ .•V, '-° ? 'i?; ?.S'?i, '?? ,e '.r - ? .?. ,. ,• " ? , xf;'i1:?,'•? 5 '?i! .. ?(?{r;a,7f; `r?.,i..; `.'. 'a." ?al,r > ? ?r f 1 .-4t?, if .Y?`:l?+?;y,??i;???y'jt.}?i?.Sf'??{?.y?.?!N•.,°sf 3r. '%r,'.ar. ?• ;, ,.- , r ., ? ' ,?n °? iY e,%, .??? tIt I?L`' r,??,z?'} i.??n'Y Qf. 'ai? ??.: °s?. • 'V• ier;; ' °., , ?: .Ii', ,q .. rY'S;? ??L,',c' y•yY ?rk,.•k? ??a S'?%'r..lt• '?:?,•r :si' A, ri •?x? ?.l''1 ?w4. i•?`? ?'' •??;'I.,:.' r`S ?:t"rF F i1:+l4i :S'M'? r:}'?.??4f4 , ?a4a><:i:'!w? '?? t; t?y{r ys? w ? ,?r•a•: !?"?'?F ?:i-,J"' '.s' y S;.:Y T?' .ti?4 ?.? .,?..,•'• z ,;??s •? `,'?,?Ir. tl„M,, t" ?7j ITF? t ! ? ?I f?? ? r J/ F Y, k4,,t "l?'r'?,? rr ?.'.PAiJ'-; ?'. ? b? ??ti r 1''ii'!'•.'?.S ? ri???51 .y ,1.. Y r ' ?" ' v? r .S? ?' t7•, ryr. I?j`;{•,6:-,+S• ?.i?? . r,.;:3 rti'••.tip p. ,...?; '` ..e% ,s g`,Ty.:; '' >.e ;+: ??/?"l:':gJ;,x.:?:"' .`? + .? ??e :-.?"f.? F'J 1'i lii L< 41 ri?E?fa4 ?.N"R. ;, ?3'°, ?F ? ? ?.;. .'(" Y? Il.,, ? i 1. ••?. ,I.'E'Sr .?.1 1''? f'I"? rll 7,'1•?V.-. ?rY. ,, .i f,'S, S':.. -i l.t '?. ?3 r ? '•,E., „ r .,, e a&+L e"k.. ,:?...r,?t?. r..4vr,, .r?.. .•t: tt'_, .:tt. ,T ... .. ?.i. n:et,s_ r .: ..?}. ., ? ., oo 0 0 r '10' 5 gen, a X !°, , yy?yyi[?r !'?y}si:'?r f':?:,Mi':J? 5ii,'•i.r?!?'a'•''?,':1?.? r • 4 '?'`.x???.' rt .'il?s , f !2 r sl , } .a;`1'r-\ ° ?:,.q<:r.=.,rti.v.' i' ?.i r;?:e ?• , r,'. . 'a,; ;' '.r `s ,. .,v?Y:CSr:„?ltz?.'gs> •t '?: ??•;'='?sf+':Y`"lt+?vd.. rf.?.. Y.F?< ? ',_`sS:?F?.. "?? f_., ,ay.?r:. , i ..f.? rc?p????.'+,. 'r ..s' y ? ? t ? .t .^s ;n Z t' { '•7.' .t•y'.i t4a?` : ?,. {, .._: ' ;.''. ?,, .; ., r,'.- _ , £' •l,.t ..:;?,:.ti,° ???w. .??. .,,Y. .`s ,:a' s;r7 ?t?•: r. ' r' ?'ai. .. a ,;•?'; ;-?.'i. - .5 ?'' ? ,??, ?., i' ,w;' ?,: , r_ t\:'?1 ,?-,rt? '# 4• - s .F :?i?'. = r'? Za` -s.; :IL. !? ^a .; . r. i ,'}' ???? i r'r!,' C1 Com-, M. ission. :.^1. r r ' Meeti*ng I,Omm5?"00. ya note: 0-2-00 Preliminary (Worksession) Agenda and paperwork,that was in package' initially but then not continued onto Thursday's agenda is at " the back of this agenda pack. 3.2D ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING Thursday, October 5, 2000 - 6:00 P.M. - Commission Chambers 1. Invocation - Father James Rousakis, Greek Orthodox Church of the Holy Trinity. 2. Pledge of Allegiance - Mayor. 3.' Service Awards - None. 4. Introductions and Awards a) Savvy Award to PC&M - Presented. b) Proclamation: Seat Belt & Child Restraint Safety Month - 10100 c) Proclamation: Alternative Transportation Week - 10/8-14/00 d) Proclamation: October Jazz Month & Clearwater Jazz Holiday 21 st Anniversary - 10119-22100 e) Proclamation: Fire Prevention Week - 1 018-1 4100 f) Proclamation: Make a Difference Fishing Tournament Day - 1017100 5. Presentations a) Citywide Leadership Class of 2000 - Recognized. b) Brian Smith, Pinellas County re traffic signals - Update given. c) Marketing Person of Year Award from Florida Natural Gas Association for Roger Harris - Given. 6. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting 9/21100 & Special Meeting 9/21100 (attorney/client) - Approved as submitted. 7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda Sam Elliott complained that language had been omitted in the September 21, 2000 Commission minutes. Tim Conway expressed concern that people are not picking up after their animals. Consider ordinance prohibiting animals running lose and fining owners who do not pick up after their animals. Marv DeMoss, Foundation for Religious Tolerance, gave an update on the organization. PUBLIC HEARINGS Not Before 6:00 P.M. Second Reading Ordinances 8. Ord. #6579-00 - Annexation, 110 McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 22.01 (First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc.) ACTION: Ordinance adopted. 9. Ord. #6588-00 - Annexation, 7 S. McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 21.09 (KB Investments Group) ACTION: Ordinance adopted. 10. Ord. #6589-00 - Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban, 7 S. McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 21.09 (KB Investments Group) ACTION: Ordinance adopted. 11. Ord. #6590-00 - LMDR Zoning, 7 S. McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 21.09 (KB Investments Group) ACTION: Ordinance adopted. 10/05/00 1 12. Ord. #6591-00 - Annexation,- 18167 US19N, Sec. 29-29-16, M&B 22.02 (St Joe Company) ACTION: Ordinance adopted. !, 13. Ord. #5592-00 - Land Use Plan Amendment to Commercial General, 18167 LIS19N, Sec. 29-29- 16, M&B 22.02 (St Joe Company) ACTON: Ordinance adopted. 14. Ord. #6693-00 - Commercial Zoning, 18167 US19N, Sec. 29-29-16, M&B 22.02 (St Joe Company) ACTION: Ordinance adopted. 15. Ord. #6601-00 - amending Operating Budget for Fiscal Year ending 9130100 ACTION: Ordinance adopted. 16. Ord. #6602-00 - amending Capital Improvement Program Report and Budget for Fiscal Year ending 9/30100 ACTION: Ordinance adopted. CITY MANAGED REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (Items #17-31 - Approved as submitted. The-following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually. 17. Approval of Purchases & Declaration of Surplus par Purchasina_ Memorandum: 1) Penny's School of Dance, gymnastics instruction, 10/6/00-10/31101, est. $45,000 (PR) 2) Rotonics Manufacturing, 90 gallon refuse containers & spare parts, 1016100-9131101, est. $75,000 (SW) 3) Voyager Fleet Systems, 1 st of 2 renewal options, vehicle fuel & related services, 12/1 /00- 11130102, est. $800,000 (GS) 4) General Chemical Corporation, low iron aluminum sulfate, 1016/00-10/31/01, est. $60,000 (PW) 5) Jimmie's Wrecker Service, towing service, 1 1/l/00-10/31/03, est. $100,000 (GS) 6) Declare vehicles & equipment surplus to city needs; authorize disposal through sale at Tampa Machinery Auction or by transfer to Solid Waste 18. Amendment to Agreement with Florida Gas Transmission, additional est. $54,000; contract to Citrus Energy Services, inc., est. $49,500; contract to Motorfueler's Inc. of Clearwater, $161,542; construct gate station at Mitchell & Trinity Oaks Blvd. in Pasco County (est. total $265,042)(SBS) 19. Agreement with Pinellas County School System / Clearwater Adult Education Center, provision of educational services, est. $75,000 (PD) 20. Engineer of Record Contract to Wade-Trim for design, permitting & construction of N. Greenwood Recreation and Aquatics Center, $311,000 (PR) 10/05/00 2 it 21. Approve locating N. Greenwood Recreation and Aquatics Center on Ray Green Ball field (SW corner of Palmetto & Greenwood) and the N. Greenwood Branch Library on Jack Russell Stadium Parking lot (PR) 22. Agreement with FDOT, providing funding of project costs up to $150,000 to fund study to evaluate proposed guideway (light rail or other technology) linking Clearwater Beach and downtown Clearwater; determine technical feasibility, economic contribution to revitalization (PW) 23. Work Order to Wade-Trim (Engineer of Record), conditional upon approval by FDOT; services related to study of proposed guideway, amount not to exceed $145,000 (PW) 24. Contract to Oakhurst Construction Company, Inc., Restroom & Shower Facilities at Clearwater Municipal Marina (45 Causeway Blvd.), $101,310 (PW) 25. Agreement with Pinellas County, provide funding for South Beach Reclaimed Water Project, costs of up to $39,676 (PW) 26. Contract to Keystone Excavators, Inc., South Beach Reclaimed Water Distribution System, $1,412,695 (PW) 27. One Year Lease with Pinellas County for use of City parking lot #15, 117 Pierce Blvd., located on west side of City Hall building (PW) 28. Contract to Altec Industries, Inc., purchase of one 2001 Ford F450 utility truck with Altec AL32 aerial lift, $57,126; increase CIP budget from $38,000 to' $57,126; authorize funding under City's Master Lease-Purchase Agreement (PW) 29. Amendment to Agreement with SWFWMD, for Stevenson Creek Watershed Management Plan, to change effective date of Agreement to 316100 (PW) 30. Ratify/Confirm 12/27/99 Agreement with Meristar Hospitality Operating Partnership, LP (Hilton Clearwater Beach Hotel); approve payment to Meristar in the amount $34,550.34 for replacement of property affected by construction of Clearwater Beach Roundabout (PW) 31. Establish one additional full time employee, Heavy Equipment Operator III in Stormwater Utility, annual cost of $29,800 (PW) OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT 32. Approve Clearwater Airpark Master Plan (MR) ACTION: Approved. 33. First Reading Ord. #6597-00 - Relating to Waterways and Vessels; amending Sec. 33.067 to create a new subsection (10) to add a new defined area for speed restrictions of vessels at Island Estates - Palm Island SE - Harbor Island (MR) ACTION: Approved. Ordinance passed 1 st reading. 34. Agreement with FDOT to install natural gas mains for relocation & install new natural gas mains during SR54/US19 to Madison Street improvement project, est. $278,156.25; Res. #00-37 - approving execution of the utility joint project agreement (SBS) ACTION: Approved. Resolution adopted, 35. First Reading Ord. #6548-00 - amendments to fee schedule for land development applications (PLD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinance passed 1st reading. 10/05/00 3 r: 36. Library Board - 1 appointment (CLK) ACTION: Reappointed Judy Meiges. 37. Municipal Code Enforcement Board - 3 appointments ICLK) 6CTI-ON: Reappointed David Allbritton, Joyce Martin, & Pete Caffentzis. 38. Other Pending Matters - None. . CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS 39. Other City Attorney Items - None. 40. City Manager Verbal Reports City Manager said Largo is asking Clearwater if we are going to publicize the annexation issue on the November ballot. The Planning Director reviewed the key points of the referendum. The PI'C is requesting local governments support in this effort. The issue will be discussed at the next Worksession. 41. Other Commission Action Clark said the Make A Difference Fishing Tournament at Pier fib is from 7:00 to 11:00 a.m. this weekend is a great event for disabled children. Registration is required, but no fees are charged. He said it was great to be downtown last weekend. He said the Ultimate Transportation Week next is a great time for everyone to car pool, walk, take public transportation, or bike to work at least one day of the week to save fuel. Hooper said the Make A Different Fishing Tournament is a worthwhile cause that everyone should attend. He encouraged everyone to attend the Uno Festival at Coachman Park this Friday evening and Saturday. Aungst thanked everyone for their efforts regarding the Safety Village reopening. He thanked Morton Plant Hospital for their participation. He was pleased to see the turnout last weekend for the concert and craft show downtown. He said, the South Clearwater Citizens for Progressive Action anti-drug march will be held on October 14, 2000, departing from the Ross Norton Recreation Center. He congratulated former Assistant City Attorney John Carassas for his election as District 54 State representative. He requested interested parties send donations to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium for the rehabilitation of Daisy, a rescued dwarf pygmy sperm whale. 42. Adjournment - 7:41 p.m. 10105100 . 4 :,?#.f?,{..•`,6 ,e ? ? , , it 1 ` t ??? i?-~ a??•L?7 Yi ` r"?'; ?. .l?i:.li ?Gjtt:adG [? ? - '.. ? '• ? " ? f '? eT?,,•.{' ... .. o'p? r t, ..f: ?';p7..?:rii c .r{, ... ... M .. ... ? ... _c• Y..'t .';. ? ..t r: , ? ..,: .. .. i .BACS 1212 2.&-JLI.l MMUTER BAY AREA COMMUTER SERVICES CORDIALLY INVITES YOU TO ATTEND C-Pool Bay Area Vanpool P "IcTmnsk ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION WEEK'S e TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL FAIR Walk Teitcae WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 11, 2000 11;00 AM - 2:00 PM eo<nped Pool M"`rant DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER Gwmnteed Me Home Progam STATION SQUARE PARK ' Akenutire Work Hour "rams 620 CLEVELAND STREET Corporate Ouvrach ProEram Tax lncentires PRESENTATIONS AT NOON BY Marketing Support Ms. D. Gay Lancaster, Pinellas County Interim County Administrator TraesparlationFairs Brian Smith, Pinellas County MPO Executive Director Employee Faars Groups ErnployeeCommute Arsalysis J,B. Johnson, Clearwater Vice Mayor ParkingFodkgManagement Nick Cambas, BACS Board of Directors Eccnomk Development S Vitality Redudng pollution Reducing trofft Congestion COME SHARE IN Reducing fuel consumption Pizza Promoting ef cient land use T-shirts Informative Information Austin Center West 1408 N. Wesuhore Boutmrd Suite 704 Tampa. Florida 33607 phone 813.28182D0 Fix 813,282.8700 OW.998.RIDE (7433) www7ampaNyRideshare,org 44TW 2000 OCTO BE R 9-13 4TH ANNUAL ALTEANATIV9 TRANSPORTATION WEER 1-800-998-RIDE (7433) Weleome Jo ATW 2000 What Is ATW 2000? ¦ Alternative Transportation Week is a fun annual event held to help spread the word about getting to and from work In ways other than driving alone -- such as carpooling, vanpooling, riding the bus, bicycling, walking and/or telecommuting. Why is .ATW 2000 being heldP M To enhance economic competitiveness and vitality in the Tampa Bay area by helping to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution and fuel consumption. ® To raise awareness about convovte alternatives and services available to commuters in the Tampa Bay area. M For commuters to experience a commute alternative for the first time -- with the hope that once they discover the stress-free convenience and monetary savings of ridesharing, they will continue with the program year-roundl M To be eligible to win great prizes) And to feel good about helping the community that you live inl Haw YOU can participate in ATW 2000.E M C&mtrters will complete a pledge card; pledging to use a different method of getting to and from work (other than driving alone) of /e,Et gm day during the week of October 9-13. ® Employers will spread the word to your employees and encourage them to pledge. M 7 ® SACS will provide a separate prize category for companies participating in ATW 2000. Companies ore designated into three categories; 0-99, 100-499 and 500+ employees. In addition to general prizes given to individual participants, the company who twns in the most employee pledge cards by October 2nd will receive prizes and community recognition. ATW2000 OCTOBER 9-13 4TH ANNUAL ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION WEEK . 1-800-998-RIDE (7433) Events & Festivities Hillsbariough dr Pinellas County aM...b?.':?.}N8 {,. ., { f 3:t '4 .t. f,: ` .? fv.Y,:'S'#?{. YY:'j.'YSf'.? fir: ...:? rY..?h!{}r4 K?S.SC?^.} 5.+.ttn 3 /. Il?.l+ : M .:i..: y, •. ..,::v,Sf'N {::. 5::..; Y' ':.::5 ?:?: t ?!• 1':t".`{}Sf}e •, SY. r. t:.i:l{. '.?'i.Y Ll11 /hIT'i; ' > {:+... .?: i :4 .... }'.ii{':.:": .S).>'1?'rL ? ?r ? -?/????+ A :.-`;•':, Y.. )..'?: :: '••Y;y. S::'-;.: 4 .fps i1+ti :'.?7 y,. f. y ' Y :Y+?{: y .5{f?,. y:U3 Y. 1,.?.kf cV•)) •?}??"£§?.t?:i E;.y y:'T / ? ' '.'J :..f; }+.'.xtf1A ) L:_:?`. .w, f. I ?I??T?! Lf'l? , r4,• :: :>4.: Y+'?'?S:?r?:\'i.)S:r M1':.::..:.: vn {:Y.'.` Y+.l{ ?vir?. f; S'?S+fi'{:.:}r }TS ?7i :`:f :'? ' r: .? ;{.:w.. . r ?: ?:.+,' Y,... :: ii?? /? Jt,,??yy???? .i.4 r:':r:5•:?{? 4.?5::: :?: ?: f.': ?: 's?, ' (( •?t.i... 'v: ?:: ,.y . //??v .. '+:.: f.:.•.:).... .. ? y {. : S YS'!. >Y+T ?ISFPY.u: :'?yf 1. J{ } : +: :4s.w1:>#. .:"r»:: :1.: :., :. t ., , : ,? ri.. ,..1': .: {i }??? ?•S : .: o ,:. r. }.:4. .}........ 4 .. 2nd Annual SATURDAY 7:00 a.m. - Noon PINELLAS COUNTY/ 'PWNELLAS September 30 ST. PETERSBURG SPBC FALL FUN RIDE" TAG am - RegWration North Shore Pool (727) 867.8493 8:00 aim-Rise Starts 901 North Shore Dr., NE SATURDAY 7:00 am -11:00 am UNIVERSITY NORTH UNTI Biwa B. Downs September 30 7*0 assn. - R&gEs ration Bruce B. Downs Blvd. (813) 974-3564 'ICE?F?RlIYBIKE a-W am Rst>? Cattkry and Ambtrrty Drive RfDE' Hike Rkte To Follow (New Tampa). Contact UNTI for directions 5th Ann(821 SATURDAY 0:00 a.m. -Registratlon DOWNTOWN TAMPA HARTllne "BIKE'FHEBAY" October? 9:00 &m.-Start Downtown Commuter Ctr. (813) 254-4278 409 E. Kennedy Blvd. ATW 2080 Week MONDAY 11:00 a.m. -1:00 p.m. DOWNTOWN TAMPA TDTMO Kick Off October 9 Franklin Street Mall (813) 221-3686 Fbzdval Event ATW 2004 Week WEDNESDAY 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. DOWNTOWN BACS ildl 49bek October 11 CLEARWATER (813) 282.8200 Festival Event Station Square Park 620 Cleveland Street ATW 2000 Week FRIDAY 11:00 a.m. -2:00 p.m. WESTSHORE DISTRICT WATMO Finale October 13 Westshore Mall (613) 289-5488 Fosdval Event In addition to ATW 2000 community events, we will also have WSJT-FM (Smooth Ja= 94.1) participate in many promotions Including "Ride to Work With Ai Santana". Participants who pledge and get a group of five (5) co-workers to ride together will be eligible to have AI Santana as their guest rider in a Bay Area Vanpool van for a day - complete with We call-In remote, goodies galore and gas Is Inciudedl SACS wit have rho advertisements and promotions running on several radio stations inciudng; WSJT-FM, WQYK-FM, WRBQ-FM, WT13T FM and WSSR-FM, as well as billboards, spot television announcements, print advertisements and a booth at the Clearwater Jazz Holiday concert. BACS -- HART = PSTA -- SPBC = TDTMO = UNTI r WATMO = Bay Area Commuter Services Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority St Petersburg Bicycle Club Tampa Downtown Transportation Management Organization University North Transportation Initiative Westshore Alliance Transportation Management Organization A'7"'Va' 2? p o P W% I M? I 15A ZES--lP- Grand Prize - 5-day/4-night cruise for two to Mexico from Regal Cruise Lines Secondary - $200 gift certificate from University Bicycle Center Secondary - Adult Bicycle Secondary -- (2) One night at the Wilton Longboat Key Beach Resort - includes deluxe accommodations with one king or two queen beds. Secondary - Cell phone package - includes cell phone, battery, charger and 99 minutes of air time. CDC.I"COB E M sp -113 i` Is BAGS WA, Mk&'W A%1F 13Ai, COMMUTER Carpool Bay Area Vanpooi Public Transit Bicycle Walk TelectKnmute Computerized Pool Matching Guaranteed Ride Flame Program Merrutive Work Hour Pro=nms Corporate owi,"Ch Program Tau frxentives Marketing Support Tmnsportation Fairs Employee Focus Groups Employee Commute Arwlisd Parking Fackty Management Economic Development 3 Vitality Reducing polkrtion Reducing traffic congestion Reducing fuel consumption Promoting efidenl land use Austin Center West 1408 N. Westshore Boulevard Suite 704 Tampa. Florida 33607 phone 813.282.8200 fax 813.282.8700 800.998AIDE (7433) wwvww,TampaBay RldeshzrL.org '7RANSPORTATION WAKE-UP" A weekly radio snow brought to you by Bay Area Commuter Services concerning our region's transportation challenges SCHEDULE EACH SUNDAY MQR?NING WRRM 94.9 fm 5:30'AM WDUV 105.5 fm 5:30 AM WSUN 97.1 fm 8:30 AM RADIO SHOWS BROADCASTED Air Date Interviewee Topic 04/02100 _ Len Tria, Board Chairman BACS 04/09/00 Master Sgt Greg Bade MacDill AFB i 04/16/00 Secretary Kenneth A. Hartmann, PE District VII, FOOT 04123100 At Bartolata, Senior Planner Pinellas MPO _ _ 04130/00 Sandi Moody, Transportation Director WATMO 05/07/00 Noreen Poor, College of Public Health 'Air Pollution 05114100 Eric Carlson, Transportation Director St. Petersburg Partnership 05/21/00 Beverly Ward, CUTR y Elderly, Low Income Issues 05128100 ?06/11_/00 _6060 125100 06/04/00 ~ 61181100 07/07/00 07109/00 ^ Phyllis Pacyna, Transportation Director Dan Kiernan, County Administrator Gary Brosch, CUTR_ _ TSenator James Hargrett Lucille Ayer, Executive Director Ray Chlaramonte, Planning Commission Elton Smith, Transportation Manager Downtown Tampa Hillsborough County TransportationlLand Use Legislative Issues_ _ Hills MPO? _ Transportation/Land Use Tampa's Issues _ 07/16/00 Carlos Thomas, American Lung Assoc ? _ Motor Vehicle Inspections ? - 08120/00 I Roger Sweeney, Execubve Director _ _PS_T_A _ 08l13100_ _08106/00 07113100 _Dena Leavengood, League Women Voters Wilfred S_ergent, Sky Train_ T? k- ? ? -? -Scott Paine, U of Tam pa _Sustainability ? 1T Rail as Transportation Strategy I FDOT's 2020 Plan 08127/00 v _ _ _ _ l Dave McDonald, Pinellas MPO Welfare to Work Issues 09/03/00 Commissioner Chris Hart TBRPC & Hillsborough Co 1 09/10/00 09124100. _ Travis Dungan, Executive Director _ _ Secretary, Tom Barry_ Coast to Coast Rail Consortium FOOT and State Issues µ 10/01/00 _ __ Liz Stutts/Brian Thele _ L- of Commuter Trans l UPCOMING RADIO SHOWS I -J0/.08/00--,-.------- Sarah Noyle, BACS 10115100 _ Jeff Henning/Mike Norville, V_PSI 10/22/00 Peter Valk, Transportation Consultant Alternative Transportation Wk Janpaoling in the US & Europe _ Parking and Land Use BACS 53ALV /IMEA Bay Area --Commuter Servicea COMMUTER Fact Sheet SiE?iVi11GE5 . Overview: Bay Area Commuter Services promotes alternative transportation options (carpooling, crpoot vanpooling, transit, bicycling, walking, telecommuting) available to residents In a five- county region including Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, Hernando and Citrus counties. eayilrzaYw"ol Funded through the Florida Department of Transportation, BACS Is a non-profit agency Pubk Transit who provides programs for both employers and employees In an effort to relieve roadway congestion, air pollution levels and fuel consumption. Skyde Walk Key PTOgralrt5: Telecom"Ru Carpoolhranpool matching: SACS coordinates rldeshare efforts through the region with a computerized program that matches commuters in carpools and vanpools based on compAerizeaPod rrattttirt their home and work locations. There Is no charge for this program. GUaYa K"d Ride Horne Prop-am Guaranteed Ride Nome program: SACS administers this program which provides an Akena&e Work HowPo;rams emergency ride home in the event of illness, family emorgencles or unscheduled overtime corponft uvrad, Prorwn for registered commuters who use altemative transportation at least two days per week taxkXu rlva . The program is free for most employees In the Tampa Bay region. Marketirtt Support TmvpwUrjan Fain Bay Area Vanpool program: Wzfh funding from HARTUne and the Pinellas County EnVayee Foan Grasps Transit Authority, this program provides vans to groups of eight to 15 employees Fanprone c mtr m Otis , commuting to or from work In Hillsborough and Pinellas counties. Passengers pay a PwkiV rnaftMaweeroent nominal fee; drivers ride for free and have use of the van on evenings and weekends. Fzorxrnit Dtnelop+rwfit i YroLty ow Telecommuting: SACS can help companies draft telecommuter policies and assess its Reduan:po oa Re&cxv traft feasibility at individual work sites. Redudng fitd cmumopdon Pmmotint efficient rood use Marketing Initiatlyes: Altemative Transportation Week, scheduled for October 9_13.2000 is administered by SACS. SACS also works with regional transportation management organizations, transit authorities and metropolitan planning organizations. BAGS also participates in employer Transportation Days and various community events (Career Fairs, Community Fairs, Earth Day Events, Green Thumb Festival / 5t. Petersburg, etc.) setting up a display booth and providing materials and information to employees of larger Tampa Say area companies and community citizens on alternative transportation options available to them. dyer Outreach Efforts:- SACS works with companies to reduce their parking costs, employee turnover and taxable income by establishing employee commuter programs. Austin Center West M08 N. Westshore Btwle+nrd Suite 764 Tamp; Florida 33607 phone 813.782.8260 tax 813.282.8700 800."SAIaE (7433) www.TampaBayRidcshare.org TgQI" S ION r MISS 50 lL ICJ 0.• OCI Clearwate U Prar pR?SS - CLERK r !• - lr {rA?ORNEY Interoffice Correspondence Sheet To: Mahshid Arasteh, P.E., Public Works Administrator From: Paul Bertels, Traffic Operations Manager CC: Gary Johnson, Public Services Director Date: September 26, 2000 RE: City Commission Presentation by Brian Smith On October S, 2000 Brian Smith, Executive Director of the Pinellas County MPO will make a presentation to the Clearwater City Commission on the following points relating to the computerized traffic signal system. ? The new computerized traffic signal system will be known as' the Pinellas Countywide ATMS (Advanced Traffic Management System). ? The three existing centers (Clearwater, St. Petersburg and the County) will continue to handle local signalization and will be designated as secondary centers. A primary center with a joint staff will be established at the county communications building on Walsingham Road to handle all multi-jurisdictional timing plans countywide. ? The joint staff will !lave a representative from Clearwater, St. Petersburg and the County. ? The secondary centers will be maintained with backup multi-jurisdictional timing plans in order to provide redundancy. The secondary centers and the primary center will be linked to each other electronically and will serve as one multipurpose signal system. ? CMAQ funds already allocated by the MPO will be used to upgrade the secondary center computers with new PC's and PC based software versions of the MTCS system. o The city's SR 60 ATMS earmark for Gulf to Bay Boulevard will be an integral part of this system. September 14, 2000 Ms. Cynthia Goudeau City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Ms. Goudeau: RECEIVED SEP ]. 5 2.000 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) would like to request that Brian'Smith, WO Executive Director, be permitted to make a presentation to the City Commission at an upcoming City Commission meeting. The subject is the upgrading of the traffic signal system in the County and how this can be accomplished in cooperation with all the jurisdictions involved. The MPO has developed a report that is comprehensive in nature and would request the City Commission's response to the direction that is proposed. A copy of the report is attached. We would request that we be given an ,opportunity to make this presentation as early as possible, hopefully, during the month of September. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, B an K. Smith, Execu ' irector i nellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization BKS:ck Attachment F:lusm ccndocs\nipulmpongrnd.ck.pa 74. PINELLAS AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY MPO WEBSITk: www.co.pinellas.tl.uslmpo Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization Traffic Signal and Median Control Committee CountyNvide Signal System Evaluation Project Draft reviled W2WN 1200 rntroducti6n The Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (WO) authorized an evaluation to develop and design a countywide signal -system to implement Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) and Advanced Traffic Management Systems (AIMS) technology. The MPO determined this project be conducted through its Traffic Signal and Median Control Committee (TS&MCC). This Committee is made up of engineering representatives from the County, Cities, and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as well as planning representatives from MPO staff and the Technical Coordination Committee. The WO felt that the diversity and municipal representation of the TS&MCC would be beneficial to the countywide project and assure effective communication and coordination by including the agencies who are involved with the signal system currently in operation. Projects In 1986, Pinellas County established a computerized signal system utilizing $15 million from the Local Option Gas Tax. This system included establishing control centers in St. Petersburg, Clearwater, and Pinellas County. Of the $15 million budgeted, only $11A million was spent setting up the signal system. The remaining $3.6 million was not spent due to the decision to lease and not purchase communication lines in St. Petersburg and Pinellas County. The cost of installing the lines for St. Petersburg and Pinellas County was determined to exceed $7 million. With 'no additional monies available for the project at that time, it was decided to eliminate the communication lines from the project. Clearwater had existing city-owned communication lines, wnich were used for their signal system. The only additional project involving the signal system since its establishment was a Signal Re-timing project utilizing Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds and was completed by Pinellas County in 1998 at the cost of $1.35 million. A significant part of this project included collecting new traffic volumes necessary to develop the new timing plans. This project was completed and the timing plans installed and made operational. Si nal System Evaluation Pro'ect In December 1998, Pinellas County Public Works submitted a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality grant application for a signal system project in the amount of S7.5 million. The proposed project included the installation of an ITS system with video monitoring, adaptive control strategies, vehicle detection systems, fiber optic communication devices, etc. The project encompassed 100 intersections in the north Pinellas County area. This project was intended to serve as the first of three phases of upgrading the countywide signal system. Based on TS&MCC discussion and- with Pinellas County's concurrence, the scope of the project was modified to include a system upgrade for each of the three centers. The TS&MCC was concerned that, due to limited available funding sources, it could be decades before additional funding was available to complete the upgrade for the remaining part of the County not included in this project. The proposed implementation area was modified based on the recommendation that the project provide countywide benefit. The MPO approved the TS&MCC recommendation that they, the Committee, provide the direction for the project. The Signal System Evaluation Project was divided into three phases, which were: Phase One The TS&MCC, with the assistance of Transcore, Inc., a MPO General Planning Consultant, conducted a System Assessment on the current operation and organization of the existing signal systems. Previously, the signal system structure and function had not been clearly documented. Currently, there are three computerized signal systems that have been in operation since 1990. Pinellas County and the Cities of Clearwater and St. Petersburg each have a computerized signal system. The Pinellas County system operates the traffic signals of the other municipalities through contract agreements. The three centers are staffed by their respective personnel and maintain the traffic signals they control. Each of the systems has the ability to communicate directly with the traffic signals located at the intersections. The traffic signals controlled are wired to the control center for that system. This communication is provided by leased lines for St. Petersburg and Pinellas County, while Clearwater actually owns a majority of its system lines. The computers at the centers are based on a main frame platform and are operated on CRT terminals. Each of the systems utilize a wall map to visualize traffic signal operating conditions, communication errors, and other timing plan information. The three centers are not connected for coordination or "computer-to-computer" communication. The connecting communication devices were not included in the initial system installation at the request of the Federal Highway Administration. Other than telephone contacts between the three staffs, the systems are not synchronized. The three systems also do not operate on the same time clock system. The System Assessment concluded that the existing systems work well and are well maintained. The Assessment also concluded that there is a need for technological refreshment and to provide a system that will address ITS issues. Based upon this assessment, the MPO authorized staff, working with the TS&MCC and the GPC, to proceed with Phase Two, 2 Phase Two The second phase of the project was the Assessment of Technology review. Thin involved several months of vendor presentations intended to provide the Committee with a full understanding of available off-the-shelf systems. This was needed in order to determine the types of systems available and how the signal system could benefit based on the available technologies. Phase Three The next phase of the project was the Evaluation Methodology review. This phase included documentation of potential system components and features weighted by a survey completed by the agencies involved in the signal their importance based on' system. The two primary features deemed of the highest importance to be,included in the proposed system design are; "support for ITS functions" including such tools as incident management and traveler information; and "cost" of the central system installation, intersection controller replacement purchase, and maintenance of both the hard and software. Additional Evaluation Based on the results of the first three tasks, the TS&MCC, with MPO approval, assigned two additional tasks to the GPC. Transcore, Inc. was contracted to conduct a "corridor evaluation" to be included in the first implementation phase and determine the optimum "organizational structure" for the system. Corridor Evaluation The consultant worked with the TS&MCC in evaluating the countywide roadway system to determine the corridors for phase one implementation. Based on considerable Committee discussion, the following corridors were recommended: • Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (S,R. 60): from Bayshore Boulevard to Osceola Avenue; • Ulmerton Road (S.R. 688): from Gulf Boulevard to Carillon Parkway; + U.S. Highway 19 (S.R. 55): from the Pasco County line to Mainlands Boulevard; and • McMullen Booth Road (C.R. 611): from Lake Boulevard (near U.S. 19 overpass) to Trinity Boulevard. 3 l . These corridors were selected to provide parallel alternative routes and to optimize other on-going projec.s. The corridors were also 'd etermi ned to provide benefit countywide even though minimal changes are proposed for the St. Petersburg area. The Committee discussed the lack of corridors within the City of St. Petersburg, The City of St, Petersburg has an outstanding transportation grid system. The signal timing plans in place provide progression both east/west and north/south bound. The City representative was concerned that if only one corridor was updated with the new system, the changes would be detrimental to the coordination of the other intersecting roadways. It was determined that the area of St. Petersburg would benefit more from a later implementation phase that would update the system area wide, not just along one corridor. Organizational Structure The consultant also assisted the Committee in reviewing potential organizational structures for the countywide signal system. The evaluation was based on'creating a single operating system with multiple components, which would maintain the existing level of local control and provide countywide coordination. The option recommended by the TS & MCC was the Omnibus Operating Center. The Omnibus Operating Center concept could be structured in a variety of methods, but would provide a more seamless countywide signal system and provide data and information for other agency benefit. The Omnibus Operating Center would function as one system, with the actual control centers located in one location or at multiple locations. A listing of potential options are discussed later in the report. Implementation The Pinellas County computerized signal system project is currently in' the work program beginning in 2003. The total amount included in the work program is approximately $11.3 million. This figure is a combination of CMAQ money, the City of Clearwater's SR 50 Federal Earmark and the City of Clearwater's match funding. The implementation of the signal system project will be a multi-jurisdictional effort and will be completed with full coordination of the local governments, FDOT, MPO and TS & MCC. The implementation plait 'AncludEs the completion of a Feasibility Study, design and installation of the system. 4 Feasibili Stud (including the Requirements Document and Mann ement twdly) The Feasibility Study is the document that will determine how the system will be structurally organized and designed and the type of technology used. According to FDOT, the Requirements Document and Management Study are usually completed as part of the Feasibility Study. The Requirements Document provides the system design criteria and technology to be used. The Requirements Document is the backbone of what the system can and cannot do based on funding availability and local needs. The Management Study is a report that specifies how the system will be structured, including the, organizational arrangement with the jurisdictions, identification of the responsible agencies,"interlocal agreements needed, 'and details how the system will operate. The TS&MCC had requested MPO and FDOT approval to have the MPO complete the Requirements Document and Management Study to be included in the Feasibility Study with the assistance of Transcore, inc. It was felt that the project would be expedited if these two components of the Feasibility Study were completed by the Committee and provided to FDOT to be included in the Feasibility Study. The Committee had wanted to be directly involved in the Management Study since it will determine the organizational structure of the countywide system and how it will operate as one, unified system and in the Requirements Document, which will determine the technology and components of the system. These studies could either be completed by utilizing a portion of the CMAQ money if moved forward in the work program to 2001 or by allocating planning funds, if available, through the MPO process. Central Computer to PC Conversion The TS&MCC also considered and recommended that a portion of the initial funding be allocated to convert the existing center computers to a PC based platform. This conversion had been described as a "head replacement". The three signal systems are operating on main frame computers designed in the 1980's. Lue to modern technology, PC compuiersare nova preferred over the old main frame style system. The local operators have reasonable c: ncem regarding a system failure due to the age and technology of the main frame computers. Repairs to the existing computer systems would be expensive if available at all. 5? I It was the Committee's concern that the Signal System upgrade provide countywide benefit to the transportation system. Based on the limited funding available for this project, it was also understood that the project would only include installing ATMS technologies on approximately 4 corridors or 100 signalized intersections. It was agreed that the best method to'provide some countywide benefit and eliminate the possibility of a system failure would be to complete the PC conversion for each of the three existing centers. The PC conversion is basically the transfer of programs and data from the main frame onto PC computers using industry standard ,communication protocols between the control systems and the communications servers. The basic format and programs remain but with improved system operation and reliability. The costs of PC computers are minimal, and they would be utilized with the full Signal 'System upgrade regardless of format or programs used based on 'the future evaluation to be done. The complete system replacement will take between 10 and 15. years. The conversion will preserve the ability to coordinate those intersections not being replayed as part of the Phase I implementation. The conversion will also assure the system will continue to operate during the long-term implementation process. The Central computer to PC conversion is not the ultimate format of the ITS system. It is a project conducted through the previous manufacturer to extend the life of the existing equipment. In addition, it was the Committee's recommendation that the three centers be connected with a wide area network to provide -clock synchronization and arterial coordination. The estimate provided for the PC conversion and the wide area network set up was approximately $1.2 million. Communication Devices Currently, the county signal system consists of three separate control centers, one in St. Petersburg, Clearwater, and in Pinellas County. The traffic signals are connected to the respective control center either by leased or agency-owned communication lines. The three centers will require some form of connection in order to provide full coordination and on-line communication. This will be needed if the structure remains the same, with three centers operating as one virtual center or if the centers are combined or centralized in a variety of possible formats. The optimum communication media is fiber-optic cable. Fiber would allow for video. capabiNties,-as well as second-by-second cperation of the traffic signals. The. installation or leasing of fiber lines may be a substantial expenditure. 1 6 System Or ranization A key element with the project is the Management Study. This study will establish the organizational structure of the countywide system. The MPO had approved the project based on the new computerized signal system functioning as one system. This has always been the intent of the project as viewed by the TS&MCC -and the various agency representatives. Determining how the single traffic signal system would be implemented and organized will require'considerable discussion among, not only the currently involved agencies and staff but also those that would be included in a broader ITS approach as foreseen in the federal guidelines. The possible alternatives for a single unified signal system include, but are not limited to, the following: Pinellas Cou6 jy Operated Countywide Signal Center Pinellas County Public Works had submitted a proposal to operate all of the traffic signals in the County. The proposal stated that the traffic signal system should be staffed by one agency under the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, in order for it to optimally function as one countywide system. The proposal allows the local jurisdictions to be connected to the County system in order to provide some level of local control. .This would include communication devices at the other municipal agencies for viewing and potential operation of the local traffic signals. This would provide arterial priority timing coordination and eliminate issues with the different clock settings. This could limit local control due to the communications devices needed for this local control. 'The proposal presented to the Cities of St. Petersburg and Clearwater included leased "71" phone lines for the communication to the local centers. Based on the cursory evaluation by Transcore, Inc, of the bandwidth requirements for this scenario, "TI" phone lines are not sufficient for second-to-second operation as needed for direct traffic signal control based on the number of signals currently in operation. Additional bandwidth between the existing control centers would be required since the traffic signals are currently wired from the intersection to the respective center. 7 Countvwide Niultinurnose Sienol Center This alternative has been discussed at an earlier Committee meeting' based on a . presentation made by the Pinellas County Emergency Communications Director. The Emergency Communications Department is in the process of designing a Communications Building on 'Ulmerton Road (S.R. 688) and is in the process of establishing a fiber optic loop to serve the area. This building will house several agencies involved in emergency operations; including the Sheriff's Office dispatch, EMS Ambulance dispatch, 911 dispatch, Emergency Management, Fire Services, EOC, and others. The construction of this facility is expected to begin in 2002 and be completed by 2404. Discussion had included the possibility of including a countywide traffic signal control center at this location. The benefits of having the signal system at this location for the other facility participants to utilize should be taken under serious consideration. Currently, none of the existing three signal control centers are staffed 24 hours a day or 7 days a week. Providing the video and traffic monitoring capabilities to the emergency services agencies, which are staffed 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, would prove to be beneficial to all potential users of the system. Video monitors and other equipment could be provided to assist with the operation and . use of this centralized system by all participants. Staff for the centralized center could be from one agency or consist of several agencies working in one location. This was characterized as a "technology hotel" since several different agencies will be staffed at the one location. If the system is not physically located at this location, serious consideration should be given to provide the Communications Center with a connection to the signal system for information exchange. Additional communication device connections to each of the existing control centers would be required since the traffic signals are currently wired from the intersection to the respective center. 8 Unified (Networked) Signal Centers This proposal includes maintaining the three individual centers with communication devices installed to coordinate signal timings and clock synchronization. -One center could be 'responsible for the arterial coordination, and yet the individual centers would maintain local control over the other traffic signal's in the area. This would maintain the staffs at the three centers and still provide updated computers and software for the signal operations. The unified (networked) signal centers would operate as one single system by eliminating jurisdictional boundaries.. Local control over local signals is usually preferred by the local agencies and is perceived to be the most effective method to implement local policy on signal operation and special events. , This could be implemented by installing three databases at each of the three centers with continuous, communication between the centers. The Pinellas County Center would house the countywide database. The Pinellas County database would automatically be, updated when timing plan changes are made at the. Clearwater and St. Petersburg centers. This would provide the potential for redundancy in case of a computer center or communication device failure, by allowing another center to operate that'center's traffic signals. Additional communication device connections to each of the existing control centers would be required since the traffic signals are currently wired from the intersection to the respective center. Conclusion The ultimate design and organization of the Countywide Traffic Signal System will require considerable discussion and debate as to how it would best operate. In order for the system to be successful, acknowledgement of the system's capabilities and limitations must be . realized by both technical and policy authorities. F:Wscralcend=\mpolsncp.doc (ck) 9 ?- 4e-5? - CONCLUSIONS iCOUNTYWIDE COMPUTERIZED TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM A. One S stem Recommendations i. It is recommended that the Countywide Signal System operate as one system with primary and secondary control centers. This could be organized in various configurations, but the system would operate with no disruptions at the municipal boundaries and the major arterials would be coordinated. The system will be structured as a team approach through a Primary Control Center. The Primary Control Center will consist of multiple agency representation and will provide both countywide and local direction in signal operation, as well as include full coordination for the signal system as a whole. All primary corridors will operate on Multi jurisdictional Timing Plans controlled by the Primary Control Center, which will provide set criteria for the traffic signal operations. The Multi jurisdictional Timing Plans will provide better corridor signal coordination. Other traffic signals, not on the primary corridors, will operate on coordinated timing plans controlled by the Secondary Control Centers, however, they could be controlled by the Primary Control Center if desired by the responsible agency. The Secondary Control Centers will be located at the local level and provide the local perspective of signal control to the Primary Control Center and manage maintenance of the signal system. This will provide for enhanced signal operation by the responsible jurisdiction and allow for countywide signal timing changes due to traffic incidents or special events. By operating the countywide system as one system, countywide coordination will be greatly enhanced. This will allow the local agency's experts to control the local system while providing full coordination with the surrounding road system. This will also provide the network to implement countywide Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2. It is also recommended that the best alternative for the organizational structure is the "Countywide Multipurpose Signal Center" or the Omnibus Center. The Pinellas County Emergency Communications Department is in the process of developing a communications building on Ulmerton Road and in establishing a fiber optic loop to serve the area. This building will house several agencies involved in emergency operations including the Sheriff's Office dispatch, the EMS Ambulance dispatch, 911 dispatch, Emergency Management, fire services, the Emergency Operations Center, and others. The construction of the facility is expected to begin in 2002, with the facility to be complete by 2004. The recommendation includes housing the Primary Control Center at this location. The concept of co-locating this function with the other functions at this facility has a number of benefits including communication, coordination, and efficiency. Currently, none of the existing three signal control centers are staffed 24 hours a day. 7 days a week. Providing the video and traffic monitoring capabilities to the other communication building agencies, which are staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, will be beneficial to all users of the system. Staff' located at the communications building will be from several agencies and will work closely together to provide countywide service. This has been characterized as a "technology hotel" since the information created and gathered by the different agencies will be staffed at the one location. By locating the Primary Control Center at this site, the signal operation will be closely coordinated and the monitoring capabilities will greatly benefit the other agency tenants by providing the collected operational data to the users. Each of the three agencies, which have existing signal control centers, the Cities of Clearwater and St. Petersburg as well as Pinellas County will provide a staff member as a representative in the Primary Control Center. This may require additional staffing by the local agency. The participation by the local agencies will provide the desired attention to the local facilities and special events, as well as provide countywide signal coordination and data sharing to the other participating agencies. Additional state, municipal, or other governmental agencies may also house a staff member in the Primary Control Center. It was noted that additional participation requests should be made as quickly as possible in order for the space requirements to be incorporated into the d .,sign of the building facility. Access to the Primary Control Center will be available at the three Secondary Control Centers via a remote computer, since this connection is needed, in some form, due to the configuration of the existing "intersection to control center" communication lines. While the Primary Control Center will house the countywide database, each of the Secondary Control Centers will also have a database in order to provide redundancy. B. InitigLCorridors for the ITS System The corridors identified for initial implementation of the ITS program in Pinellas County are: Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Ulmerton Road; McMullen-Booth Road/East Lake Road; U.S. 19; and I-275. These corridors would be included for their entire length along with provisions of connectivity to facilitate the ITS purpose. This is with the further understanding that the balance of the appropriate ITS corridors will be implemented as soon as possible. C. Computer Head Upgrade The three existing signal centers utilize outdated computer hardware that is in serious need of upgrading. It is concluded that these centers should be upgraded with the appropriate PC systems, with the assumption that a like improvement would be made in the communications system linking these three centers so that some ITS data can be exchanged. D. Requirements Document/Management Study To further the ITS/signal system improvements that have been identified, a more detailed effort is needed to define the stricture of the system. It is, therefore, concluded that a Requirements Document/Management Study should be authorized to accomplish that work. E. ITS Commit In addition to the Committee membership for the ITS function that was earlier acted upon by the WO, three WO members are also identified for participation on that Committee. The four three members identified at the workshop are Dunedin City Commissioner John Doglione, Largo City Commissioner Martin Shelby, County Commissioner Karen Seel, and St. Petersburg City Councilmember Kathleen Ford. F: tus cenaoclut kgin.om.cLpgo 5.6. ., ?,, ,? .?1?!+?'?.'z?;'..If?.j .h.°.f E'.?r• a, "a'.? .... ''f '?i "'dlr, ,. ., ? .. ... ? ? _? f!. ?. I I ]i r,fl. .S d,f .;r• 1 . 1'.,. "f.. 1, ? , Ay ,f. ' ' 4 Ir '!. ,.. ; ,. J' 1 ` ? , ' ' ? •r? ? ? I'? re r 1 ? ' ,. ',k, Sir,SI?SI.?r.??;??}.+?.if??'3..?`.?.9.??Fi.d"-1,fi5rc;fx.??4?°tfsd^i ?j?'a!{',''-j.?' ''1` ? ? ? 1 ? ? _ •I' ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ' • ,d 'Y • .{.. e ';.?' , ? r, ?I?.'a •a;"dq`??.y ,.,?4 ff 1,4?+:?$` ,i'`S .t•: ? _>it••4=;; ' •.4' ;s ,_ ' }', ' n;+' ,:La, ,i 'sue. :. r• ?., t; . g, ,.?'?Y.F ..,r,?;'?•(W,,.,;=;;i:+1:a[Yl`!p .d 'f.• {,L`f: :`f s";, ,s. .,,y4.;,??.': e-m ' f , V 3 . .. a"d R . ORDINANCE NO. 6579-00 8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD AND DREW STREET CONSISTING OF THE NORTH THREE- FOURTHS OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, M1B 22101, WHOSE. POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 110 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: See Exhibit B attached hereto. (ANX 00-00-05-09) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Appr ved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney PASSED ON FIRST READING August 17, 2000 Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No, 6579-00 ¦ R- ?la J I r ra ? OS/R 1 EDDIE C. MOORE CREATION COMPLEX .t.lt,..I eu H:C-rL ? -s .>...::,.:, to •? ? 'D 7 iT N '' 1' T ti lY TnV 'fY? S i 14 E S 1 A J O?V 1 `1 rr • y y L 1 f mw C 0 6 v r a'T ? u H L F c xis 33 C }0 v" o !o f I , NV CA S T'1: a-'r40 4 DREW ww j YNifnrl `. n n 1 ? 3 I S 1 a? r] I C 1 EDDIE C, MOORE OS/R 8 86 ? - 0 M RECREATION COMPLEX -- 25 2r Liz 0 tt/f;.t rFC111tlIE3t FY 4z:n-,1:<f STREET U7 52t! z (7 1 - 1 . . ."! r*r?t?s?z rrr rerrrr rrw a srrau ' , 6 7, f . ' •r ,• s : . .1, ,., , t: ?: LQ'. -tsC ': r:''L?, ,z ?: ?- a•- .,'. 'ii':7?3r• -:P•:: ?.i?. C,'.:•.?r.l .. i. ?,_i;..7W:f?f.' la' I? -f i' ..Y '' 1', •fi' i?T._ YS.: ?.tir?•?.'-t ,.•.a ? •v:;, ??'..: - ' ..4. .t' is ?r?'. 4a+; ?': A ?•` .._ y., -;t'.: ?-?... :'•:i;: w-:. .Y , i'.. n. ' '? ? r4? _ :_ ??: .air ri7?. -1?'' ?S _ - Jf:r •7 h:... y,j. r:.'.-•7. '; •k'l=r' -1e_,'C,r. ,S".Lr...,,'..„??. ..,i r.-•rrr: 'w. ?' _ '`1. ?,•- ';;{' , . :.r•: l• • _ '.?. .`t '.' w• :.?. ?. ,- rN. • BAY- ' ?,.,.. ;?.ri? rr. ?,? ..riSti y, .•r'.5? vr,;•.e' 'i..':' - ?- K: ::: w•?'.r-. (hr••'•L' ?, oj't ls' v : r,:,1, 'Jig' 1.',•'.' V' .?I: '.J' ?}.'i ..' r 'r.°' ?:?; c . `'i li .1 :?` : Ci 'n •+•:Yr?l_:?:;ti'' '? : • r,rilx.:-. AYE''"?? ? ?'%''' ;t ;i';,r•' "r:?•'r" .r _" f.. 'i. `' f •x... :1{ ?•'-r '7 <•+s•?. ..i •Ill! 1..., 71, ri .s.;}'?Ir?' »•i•`•'?..i. ''t' :•??"/.41.?•nt:: +i??'c 1, r,'..i.: :,:/ nti. ? , q' 1? ??1 f•1 '`? i_ ,''l' :C rvit.yli.- .'r, 7? .. qL'T '!' "-:i til`r?: .;!.1..'? ,•p .i'Tid21:t#{ °•'?' :'+a .7.ar :?r.''?r'.1` '?L,'.•il'.Ai r•,r?'i• ,?..:: t•? 1'•':.r'.: Y??..,::fC'y''i., ?s:- ''" "?' '' ''?:. rL •fiAT. `L• 1,1?r :r: _ .??i.` 1 ?:' '1 '.? i:'....? •4.'?'y .?i .1,1 {?i ?r s•? ,.r,. f+l'? ".,1.. ,.. '1'• rl .rte fa?4 ..:,'••, •tJ'i. rp ;' ,rr.l`;.,'i r 1F'?•t ?lf?? „r?.'?}„ .1: 't1? ':'? .r,•.! _ .i .. '^:'"'a,'.'P'?i '. :i!'.?•k ??'•.• •.: ? ."? 11y??, +'L i TY,',•r.. :s :?.. :rc ir: ?? 1'. •'? l?'i:.?i... f`'..., 1.. '':ti ?i: t. i t, w`.5,..`wl? AlIL7.C1?? ^i' ?.• is ,s t !r'1::".: r:.'..?. .r'? i !: 5 .. T n: '\ ! .:a ••>"?ltir 'f'•,\ _ f.-..»:.,G ?la•'r-: r• 1Ai w ?r .1i Iw >M,:• :'J. .S• „}i.h11':`:?? ?r??'', .r•rr .Shy '.,r ;,°,,' nr}.: i:'-`.. '.irJ`?!._j-:r:r' "lj?t. 1"- ' ? `? +? /}?ytll 4 p{r.:.{p??'Jf •:r.? .iT'. ?y'*' •'•: :1 ', al:'If l:r?:i: ?..',!"'.,-?:i :.rrv:_?N ?.ir' fir'"!' 'a,.?p:w „r??r.:?: C..,, :Y? R ? ? ?. 111 ]!IY7• >r,/.?'?t.r`.::?';'r I.t?:-,'ii.'••.r "'•; ?.. i•.... ?x.'.r?.a -.._.•A??,? 11 ?.-'.'r: :'.:',;.. w' u' t? 'i. ?n ?¦YYYYYYNNNNHH ti CHESies?A? 11]Lr..???,ritFrrairrisirliVi??rrniiriirra 'J7_:': ' :1t?' ? ?y,???,pc3q zap a? ? ;°aa. ? CHESAPEAKE «, PARK Ifl CNESf1PEm STREET 1., yew ?^ ^ 1?I? ^?? :'t 1' ?,: i. • I .}'.r 0 S itlut,a7 70 342 Ei d •_ "Z:t.r' Arm u[P irk= _ °:'•rr ° O a +- re.. .:a CLf,?.1./,IJLT• ' IP,?,rti t: irQ --0 fr1 2 Whi *? _ KO., scr.•n,,sn '?_ • ?w- _.r,-'°.,.-?0=--??:?: •r i S'r w r .r t . try 4'. !- °' ?"r i pg''i'•' ?no? im 3J`n .? C•g ? D R1 h r N`?:7/•': it7/::4?`ni+ e • i' ?.•2 ? :?, ? ? .•r r •r 7 '1 r 1 f all ROPOSED ANNEXATION ON AND ZONING CLASSIFICATI Fir :t Sar,t]St ChLff,_`` Oi In': Case: S: :?_1 Chiv lanc ADR PROPF.RrY DESCRIPTION 1IC VO.Vk n Rcrt? F LAND USE PLAN ZONING RaSiCent,cf ,i,,.n PROPER'TY SIZE ACRES: 11 81 'rtstituti?'rci Imstitutit;nci Righl-ot-Nay Slxe Aces: 1.56 AG SEC: Ir TWP: ??'? RANGE: 11?E TY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: urn 18. ?:GC CITY COMMISSION: Au,u;:l 17, F? Exhibit "A" Ordinance No. 6579--00 y, m LEGAL DESCRIPTION .110 McMull.ei Booth Road' The North three-fourths of the North one-half of the N.W. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of Section 16, Township 29 South,, Range 16 East, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the N.W. corner of the N.W. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, and go S 890 28' 4211 E, 1338.47 feet, along the North boundary of said N.W. 1/4 to the N.E. corner of the N.W. 1/4 'of the N.W. 1/4 'of .the aforementioned Section 16, thence S 00° 37' 34" W, 495.39 feet, along the East boundary of the N.W. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of 'Section 16; thence N 890 28' 39" W,"1338.40 feet; thence N 00'0 37, 03" E, 495.37 feet, along the West boundary of the N.W. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of Section 15 to, the Point of Beginning; less the East 30 feet thereof for the maintained and occupied right of way of State Road No. 593, County Road No. 31, McMullen Booth Road, all lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida. Less any Portions thereof lying within the existing road right of way, McMullPit Booth Road (State Road 593 a/k/a Cuunty Road 611) on the East, Counter, Florida. 1 EXHIBIT "B" I I ORDINANCE NO. 6588-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,560 FEET NORTH OF GULF TO' BAY BOULEVARD, CONSISTING OF M & B 21-09 IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS SEVEN SOUTH MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: The North '/= of the South % of the Southwest % of the Northeast % of the Northwest % of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, Less and Except the West 50 feet thereof conveyed for road right of way and Further Less and Except the East 400 feet thereof. (ANX 00-06-12) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED A pr ved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sl s Assistant City Attorney- September 21, 2000 Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 9 Ordinance No. 6558.00 M' 1 ?- N I','w Y -? ' 1 Pool Co._% •+•'i•, I 01 it ?'' ^7 P'f c7 ?`7I =`J ?CLEVE ND ST. .+?,o to . `;t ? OYSTER :i5r 7 ?? 1-7- ? 8 9 0-1 I F3 Tf' I 121 ^22 1'+-••?r-ti,.. s-?-1 J]: ?t •.. w-srws-.? r? lti 13., n' - "'!"<'7"?•f'1"1?1; ,, nw }r`•.::. C7 ti?'j.r?,'k .?r•'+ :M '.4;' r 1 1,?, `c?Ir r e`- r`.. ,+I .71 -7 21 AYS ORE' '•A ? N •'? ri z Y V .^•-• r.,(•^ m' ' {?, •?'•,I,' ' • ? r i`ti.i•t` ?:.'ii, P1f1: q.a . 5 1 i,.?+ t? I r ?`\31 I1:' 1'1F•- CRUHYY." # s' 0¢ed;?xceptlGn:, '•r;' ?'??~• t Lail. COURT 3777- 1•?M RC (? ? f} lIV'i ?!?? 1? CHESAPEAKE 1 I< PARK 105-28 I 'I.Crt' Ti NPA ;y *W's y r !li 12, ;•' '.i' {.•. s, fir;.,.; i?tcn=r'viLnt:` ?': zf4i, r r?µ; 1 1 1 t 1 i 1 t_3iw T "' :rte i'• ? 1 '•.ccir:f -,,o''.,}, ? r_ ?r•'1.i?4'.1?.?:'i:.u -, .' <:? ,.-_?.: <?•r?? 'r,•- Ll° 1 . 3 a -3 6 HOUSES 19-33 b \ •;?th, r!f '1 :.;r.r .?r.i i,`a?l?' .:. r? ., . q..--r..y. = ra re :.i? i!rla? "N`• alt (;: ?•[(! +/.'- :::? raw??? wr ..,• ~ n '?.Wt . i .u . ?d;'?,;;e'?L,4?} r_tir.t, r J: ii ?;4}•.' -. •.1 ••. ':: r.. ,..:' '?',::i•C?7?r?.. ?; ;'''^ 'r+?, -f ?21/1a:?21:1, Lttij.Ot; '--r; •''' '?•j? ?: jd ' :J-" t o^?-?'t..;r. :,• . •, .. :'?? rr ..: .7.Z•. a '? ,g ?•;; i , oj.l:, L'e'a'. n !r, •?•r ! ?` Tom- >'•.r. ? ?, r.` .,;tr. k,, '`.• _ _.-5-, 1 [??+ t:a• •`K p R.•.?•: ,."r[ pr7 a'?t''.'tiiul ^r?w.... i'. .,y .? ? .?. :,i, .. ..,. -"?•.t. z?? +?' ""?'t.. ?' 1?'=;i` =y'? ''' 3?" ' ?a} .:',:•,..:, ;:w, _•:_r: ?- HN A WAY RK 2 S' ; r.?, '+.° "'? ?i':•ra:??;'-...• •'• ;f`??,• yi.=r.r; i:: '. '• '.1 r?? ...- , - or r. :. it: „fw F:?r rl, Yf hs:},?i:,'1 •f-,.. ".•?'r,}. ?* 4 3: ?'8?66.4:2$ C ?V7',??.l CIS Ka:. .. Ir e?; 'r7 'G?`,: r I '' .'[!IC .s :S•. ?;.+: i .tH ti•, 'r. ?. _r_:: (2t ,^? ?>;.1. ?':? N 1 ? ,,: ?: .., . Y_ •'tr •i.i r ,' •,• '?ul': •''?^ r?'? U "A? y+•_i.:;: 1 • ,. {'I nl r'7 r; '/ _r ?i .,l . '?:?,1. ?^ :':-rfiT:r??iel.j:_!i7+ 'i .r., [,?.: i'••1 ' i ? ±:" 1• 4.. v44'?` .-f.:?t' ', - r J= r .. ?y .?.a ?r••? ?, t;i• ,,. u7:tl? r 7? +^;;;. i', :,?:L. L?. Ij'i ''i •,??.i ,,'";:? s '?1•? rJ '?;c:'{`...^1' •'yi::l -"={i;a!y;?"•?-:i'•J` 1' s:.. •.I ['.;;:•G ?''.O• y,?r,f?a yl ]'?«[:?? b,? :i, r' [ .r• IJ _ t 1'4;,:t?:?.:L L} ???.? j-?." _. +, ? •Z '1 1•x r.. ?:,? `lo,, -.r ?.A?'.?t,.._.?,• 1:K•;? ?•? ::1. JOHN'S ?. t.' ?'A: , ?_?,, ? 1 K' .',',?}"'e???`t't{'LY: :S.. t`??'~•...r F"• .Il, ,`..1d ti.}?,la?.'•_?.•,rr; '•Sr /? y •"` {+• ' •.r.},iti,.? ?l :F •ct?.>I?7! r, "?. ?' i 't ..i ?' ''i 4 % • ? 1 W. 7 F, ?.: T :7F. T ? r 1r, .•s. r r1'?!''i-i=•r;s..? ? L •' ••' _ '.r `rt. ,•;••.t. 'ki?x.? 1 r•i, 4a:i`[k' Vys ' { : L '.. '+a •?• A • s. ?? •• .5, t ° r, i,: ; . r, iii c O CJ, O,?G?? ? \\ l ! ? J ?;.. `?"?4 r?. }:.t?.k4t,Y,''!j" w' <r `::r,'; il" rrr :?• 4_ f ?? • J +_ :: 'a'= r... .pt. •. ,ear/.?. ' ? r { 5 3 I-;,!.S••.?.,t .y? }j r4 '.:u, Y.. a-,' ti,' u- \ 1LLSlDEiy? 'TRAFI ER i :r +. , ti •F.?L?L,«^' r i ??-1fr>?i ? Mrs ? {'i - •r C'? ? , I J ?!i? ., "•;, n;,+. }.'.t`- `'?l' t";: +. r_ -tir='• JE w I ? \d ? a Va b,-i .'.1'•''?f•r ..+.'a:?wt1"r•?.-s ; r?lzs•, .h.L _•. `... .t •, };:?i .'r ;.L:-. :yr, r ?'?,:_ rr., ;7?:ri5`:.:.:r;• .? ?'O ?` ` O Q ? ?', ? ` ry ? ??' ? :j '? ?;\jP \ ?. ? ?, ? ! ', i •`. ;•'.,; •?':'7:' tit- •J n• \?r? \ , a?1 J , \ ? tom, \?i : ,\ s ? :?:'.?•!ti.''r• ;?;?a,: :?;;. ? "t. ?. ??,:,?.[''' ? \? ,?' `? ? C`?AR,Y4If:?••? \f, ? ?f?? \t) ???.. ? \ ?? `; `u ?; _ •:''.?,.': ;+:'h.'?.',:«1'«: t[` -fr'•.: _ .•,'.e. i k:: . • .,COUNT "y"AVENUE D tWHIV F AYEDGE CL ' E"t'N TEF I o }.f.z:' ;j a'•.3 ?rrj. a C ,r 7 LL [3 ) J % •. a II N ?• } F7-S' '4,••!'. ,• Nj'• tip" r': ti ti z w ti =?2?'n 3 7 6'' km U PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION 3 OWNER: KES inve;tnlrni_ Grcup ADDRESS: 7 %k:l'.1[all=n Ec°,- :ats: P'I'ION; T PROPERTY DESCRI - LAND USE PLAN ZONING Q FROM: ???:c7en1?=I Urbcn 4 PROPERTY SIZE :ACRES: 0.84 , TO: r :_i;?nfial ?_'rbcrl Riaght-of-way Size Acres: 16 ATLAS PAGE:.-'--'`'ry SEC: TWP: RANC E: COMN- IUNITY DEYELOPNIE`iT BOARD: •:,,:?'.! i?. w': I:': ' CITY COMMISSION: y ordinance No. 6588•-00 w ORDINANCE NO. 6589-00 J? AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,550 , FEET NORTH OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, CONSISTING OF M & B 21-09 IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS SEVEN SOUTH MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL URBAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Pro a Land Use Catego[y The North Y2 of the South 'h of the Southwest'/ of the Northeast Residential Urban % of the Northwest % of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, Less and Except the West 50 feet thereof conveyed, for road right of way and Further Less and Except the East 400 feet thereof. (ANX 00-06-12) Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6588-00, and subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 21, 2000 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED AppAved -11 . ? ast f Leslie K. Dougall-Si e Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No, 6589-00 Ib . . F RU a -,nVVUw CC - -7m iAPEAK rAeET Rli R/OS INS RLU r ' ' 1 t l l l l R/OL ' : RU : KENTUC" AYE" ' : , ' y'?• : : : ' : : : : 1 ti'1 r , : r , 'nUfS= AYEMX ' ' 4>t7 < r dG: CG , Cur TU " rL ,? M1. . : , ;rAkKWAT 1 R 1 I I 1 r I. ; WATER RLU M. INS CG COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP OWNER: KB Investments Group Case: ANX 00-06-12 ADDRESS: 7 South McMullen Booth Road Clearwater, Florida PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: M&B 21/09 PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Urban PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.84 Right-of-wa Size Acres: ATLAS PAGE: 292A y SEC: 16 TWP: 295 RANGE: 16E CITY COMMISSION: Seplember 21, 2000 Ordinance No. 6589--00 ORDINANCE NO. 6590-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,550 FEET NORTH OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, CONSISTING OF M & B 21-09 IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS SEVEN SOUTH MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance Is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Pro a Zonis District The North M2 of the South '/z of the Southwest of the Low Medium Density Northeast % of the Northwest'/ of Section 16, Residential (LMDR) Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, Less and Except the West 50 feet thereof conveyed for road right of way and Further Less and Except the East 400 feet thereof. (ANX 00-06-12) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6588-00. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 21, 2000 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6590-00 ?6UNfY. :? "f'{. 4ecd i1?ccPSlon .!. `? - CHESAPEAKE PARK S R 22/ CLEVE ND ST C . r[ tp ri :rr q. , , r 24'1 `. •22 311 COURT J` '•,,? TEI V 5 10 . --28 I r?,??;..y r? •r7.• rR, d ?:m_??r•i? 1lJ!? ,.;{ n' fir. ..r.-. :f_ :.aw. -r?-;• _ - ?. - , -r? ,-.: •. fir: ,. f' t'? : _ 1?.:{?';{' .,t _tG^?? ?'. 1:'.:j f a:., . . -[ ?'. , y: f:4 Sic. - ,^ ."• ,(?• It i:?Y.. "'ca1lr+?Y: ' ''AVENUE. CL"rRW?i?K 4 ? i 4 j I 1 5 1,9 2 U -x 14 3 12 to J f?r{o! TR D 1 r? ! r C TR L .?1 y .•'?r .? ti t Ir7 c % <'7 t-7 ?] h v1 t r' I [ 2 ?d ?irl'? j aI II_% g `? Q S R^ ` AYS ORE A;'ii - 1211 1IR i 1 i 1 1 1 1 - TOWNHOUSES 19-33 5r 021, i2• aTI•f.3, t? ^ t r?1 •ly-r .:.,...,? •?JOhiN P K'NAY RK K: ;:?;?t?ft '•`;! ,•?••. i. •r. t1 `•, r.??: 1 ?? r' °' 4j r f':?r?.??24?1?}2.yj;??} ?' "',?'.;??ay?;i;• ? =, ??1 ,?; r, ?; ?.2{/t! ar ;O?• 4StJ rr??-•'„'rfi r?,: try ft ?4? ••i•\?l1?. ..`3.?.' ? si.",yf.'• ;fin [ . !. • ?i? • ;i=f : ??? '?i: ?f.?+-r _?? V 1 z HN S? WY. r> ':,:? t ca pl?tiTY'. Ff'. ?. o ! . • C.f_-.Sf,V4 tt.-1 J\ \? ?t p O\ D O, 90 r C-lx ILLSIDE\ ?\ `!?,TRAlLrR :co?NT MDR BAYEDGE ;$ I 7 7 „ "2 ;2 05 C, C-7 '. f N .•e'A'. "'DOWNING :n v :.t a u PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION >>" Ir7•I•`?i'71?r7?? rCcLlC7 I Ca$E: aiI"C „1_ r'^ - h - OWNER: __ - ADDRESS: 7 ?•^u;rs ?,1°',1sEl?r7 ?;,,`.;? ;Of_c PROPERTY DESCRIPT IONI : _+ - - s `- - -' = LAND USE PLAN{ ZONING FROM: ??cirj?ntlrl I r^f;n r<.-? i PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.34 Ir 0: Right-of-way Size Acres; 16 ATLAS PAGE- SEC: TWP: RANGE: I;. - ComfUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD. -.,.;u;f CITY COMMISSION: Ordinance No. 6590-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6591-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF US 19 NORTH AND TO THE SOUTH OF BELLEAIR ROAD, CONSISTING OF METES AND BOUNDS 22- 02 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 18167 US 19 NORTH, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. V. 01"), WHEREAS, the owner or predecessor of interest of the real property described herein and depleted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A executed an Agreement to Annex the subject property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and th4 City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto (ANX 00-06-11) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: -'C. Z k12 Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney September 21, 2000 Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6591-00 LEGAL DkSCRLKION Beginning-at -ha`Norttiwest• Corner of.Section 29': Township '2q South, Range 16:East, -Pinellas' County, Florida as a point of beginning= Thence S. • 89 9048" E., -along- the North boundary line of said Section 29, 721.40 'fe ti.-Thence S. 01. 26149" E. ,' to a point on a line that is S. 89 21'0 "•E.;.-from the center of the State Road department bridge, said penter':being o6'the West' line of -said Section 291' (Equally distant-from the North and South end of said bridge) t Thence N. 89 21_1100 W:, •alorig said line to said point an the West line of Section-291 Thence Northerly along said West boundary line of said Section '29 to, the point of beginnings Less -that part'for the right. of way Pighway ?19, and less that triangular portion being more' particulpTiy described: as follows r From the Northwest corner of said.Section•290 Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Fi.nellas County; Florida as a point of reference l Thence S.;.'89 19128".E., .-along the North boundary line of said Section 29,•721.40 feet for a point of beginnings Thence S. 01 26, •49m E., 627.87 feet to a point on it line which is S. 89 21100" E., from the centerline of the 'State Road department bridge, said center- line being on* the West line of Section 29 .(Equally distant from '4?+ `-?= ' • North and South e* id of said bridge) s Thence N.'89 21166"-* W. , along said line 10.85 feet t Thence •N. ' 00 27922- W. , 627-57 feet to the- point of. beginning. •zr r EXHIBIT "B" v_ r? OWNER: St. Jae Company ADDRESS: 13167 U.S. 19 North Cfearwater, Roride Case: AN (DO-C."71-11 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: FA'&B 22/02 LAND USE PLAN ZONING FROM: Ccmrnerriak General C-2 PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: TO: Ccmrnercia! Genera) Right-Of-xay Size Acres: ATLAS PAGE:326A SEC: 2a TWP: 293 8.63 RANGE: 16E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD:auqusr :?, ?cca CITE' COMMISSION: Septvnbcr .'I, 2GGG W rxhib.it "A" Ordinance No. 6591-00 PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION ORDINANCE NO. 6592-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF US 19 NORTH AND TO THE SOUTH OF BELLEAIR ROAD, CONSISTING OF METES AND BOUNDS 22-02 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 18167 US 19 NORTH, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS COMMERCIAL GENERAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Propel Land Use Category See Exhibit A attached hereto Commercial General (ANX 00-06-11) Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6591-00, and subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to § 163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 21, 2000 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Appro ed as to form: Attest: , L Q a Leslie K. Dougall-Sides(i Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 6592-00 r I LEGALDkSCR PrioN i . •ti. Beginning "at he"Northwest- Corner•.of• Section 29. Township '29'South, Range 16: East '-Pinellas' County. Florida as a point of beginnings Thence S.•89 9948" E., along- the North boundary line -of said Section 292 .721.40 •fe t i: Thence S. 01. 26,49" E. , 'to a point on a line that is S. 89 2100 "•E.,.Srcm'the center of the State Road department bridge, said penter"being an the West line of said Section 291' (Equally distant-from the North and South end of said bridges Thence N. 89 21.1•00" If.', alorig said line to said point on the nest' line of Section%29 j• Thence Northerly along said West boundary line of said Section '29 to, the point of beginnings Less -that part'for the right. of way Fighway Y19, and less that triangular portion being more- particularly described' as followa s -' From the Northwest corner of said.Section•290 Township 29 South. Range- 16 East, Pinellas County; Florida as a point of references Thence S:'89 19'28".E.. .'along the North boundary line of said Section 29,.. 721.40 feet for s point of beginning1 Thence S. 01 26, 49'e. E., 627.87 feet to a point on a line- which is S. 89 21100! E.0 from the centerline of the 'State Road department bridge, said center- line being on'the West line of Section 29 -(Equally distant from '??? =•= .' • • North and South erid of said bridge) s Thence N. 89 21'66' • W.. along said Une 10.85 feet s Thence •N. - 00 27122" W. * 627.57 feet to the point of beginning. 1 i EXHIBIT "A" a i i 3 COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP OWNER: St. Joe Company Cam ANX 00-05-11 ADDRESS: 18157 U.S. 19 North Clearwater, Florida PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: , M&B 22/02 PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial General PROPERTY SIZE ACkES: 8.63 Right-a[-W2Y Size Acres; ATLAS PAGE: 326A SEC. 29 TWP: 29S RANGE: 16E CITY COMMISSION: SeplEmber 21. 2000 Ordinance NO. 6592-00 ORDINANCE NO. 6693-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF US 19 NORTH AND TO THE SOUTH OF BELLEAIR ROAD, CONSISTING OF METES AND BOUNDS 22-02 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 18167 US 19 NORTH, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS COMMERCIAL (C); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance Is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1, The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Prope[ly Zoning _ District See Exhibit A attached hereto Commercial (C) (ANX 00-06-1,J) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3, This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6591-00. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 21, 2000 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-Sid Cynthia E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No, 6593-00 LEGAL 'DbSCR Y2• QN ' ti. Beginning at ?he' NortMwest• Corner of • Section 29, Township '29 South, Range 16-East,-Pinellas %County, Florida as a paint of beginni.ngi Thence S.•89 9'48" E.? along- the North boundary line •of.said Section 29, 721.40 •fe t 1'.=Thei nce S. 01. 26'49" Lr'..'to a point on a line that is S. 89 21' Ob-- E., --from the center of the State Road department bridge, said penter•.being on the West line of said Section 291` (Equally distant •from the North and South end of said bridge) t Thence N. 89 21•1•00" W.', •alorig raid line to said point on the nest line of Section••291 Thence Northerly along said West boundary line of snid? Sect.ion'29 to, the point of beginnings Less ,that pakt•for the right, of way ? ighway . h'19. and less that triangular portion being more, particulprly described' as follows s • '' - From the Northwest corner of said.Section, 291 •Tflwnshi.p 29 South, Range. 16 East, Pinellas County; Florida as a point of reference i - ' Thence S. ' 89 19"28" .E.. -*along the North boundary line of said Section 29,•721.40 Feet for a point of beginning) Thence S. 01 26, 49w E., 627.87 feet to a point on a- line- which is S. 89 21100" E., from the centerline of the 'State Road department bridge, said center- line being on the ifest line of Secti on 29 • (Equally distant from ` ``•= --: • - North and South end of said bridge) i Thence N. 89 21' QO*= W. , along Ui Id line 10.85 feed Thence 'N. - a0 27#22" W. , 627.57 feet to the point of beginning. i 1 1 t EXHIBIT "A" r? OWNER: St. ..Ice Ccmpany ADDRESS: Ir-?167 U.S. 19 Ncrth Cle,jrv,,cter, Florida Case` Anx 00---06-11 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Ir1f 12 1 /G2 LAND USE PLAN ZONING 54 FROM: C?mmer;ini General C-2 8.63 PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: - Commer6ol Generd C TO: v R[ght-os-way Size Acres: b ATLAS PAGE:326A SEC: 29 TWP: RANGE: 16E ? b _ - R COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0OARD:,%+,t)usi 15, :aca CITY COMMISSION: St! lIe ttr 'I, ,CM l Ordinance NO. 6593-00 PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION q. ORDINANCE NO. 6601-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER. 30, 2000 TO REFLECT INCREASES AND DECREASES IN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR . THE GENERAL FUND, SPECIAL PROGRAM FUND, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT FUND, GAS FUND, SOLID WASTE FUND, WATER & SEWER FUND, STORMWATER FUND, RECYCLING FUND, MARINE FUND, PARKING FUND, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FUND, AND CENTRAL INSURANCE FUND, AS PROVIDED HEREIN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, for operating purposes, including debt service, was adopted by Ordinance No. 6457-99; and WHEREAS, at the Third Quarter Review it was found that an increase in expenditures of $554,522 is necessary in the General Fund; an increase of $1,254,010 is necessary in the Gas Fund; an increase of $71,900 is necessary in the Solid Waste Fund; an increase of $96,140 is necessary in the Recycling Fund; an increase of $250,000 is necessary in the Marine Fund; an increase of $66,840 is necessary in the Administrative Services Fund; an increase of $2,411,109 is necessary in the Special Program Fund; and that sufficient revenues are available to cover these additional expenses; and WHEREAS, a summary of the amended revenues and expenditures is attached hereto and marked Exhibit A; and . WHEREAS, Section 2.519 of the Clearwater Code authorizes the City Commission to provide for the expenditure of money for proper purposes not contained in the budget as originally adopted due to unforeseen circumstances or emergencies arising during the fiscal year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; Section 1. Section I of Ordinance No. 6457-99 is amended to read: Pursuant to the Amended City Manager's Annual Report and Estimate for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1999 and ending September 30, 2000 a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, the City Commission hereby adopts an amended budget for the operation of the City, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED September 21, 2000 Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: L Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk i ?s EXHIBIT A 1999-00 BUDGET REVENUE First Third Quarter Mid Year Quarter Original Amended Amended Amended Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1999104 1999100 1999100 1999100 Amendment General Fund: Property Taxes 23,856,090 23,856,090 23,856,090 24,123,700 267,610 Sales Tax 5,366,000 5,366,000 5,366,000 5,366,000 Franchise Fees 8,060,000 8,060,000 8,060,000 7,808,000 -252,000 Utility Taxes 15,700,000 15,700,000 15,700,000 15,620,000 -80,000 Licenses & Permits 3,132,000 3,132,000 3,236,600 3,236,600 Fines, Forfeitures or Penalties 1,239,000 1,239,000 1,239,000 1,383,000 144,000 Intergovernmental Revenue 8,805,540 8,595,540 8,595,540 8,410,540 -185,000 Charges for Services 1,668,770 1,668,770 1,668,770 1,700,770 32,000 Use and Sale of City Property and Money 1,308,900 1,308,900 1,309,650 1,358,725 49,075 Miscellaneous Revenues 150,500 152,750 152,750 152,750 Interfund Charges/Transfers 10,166,340 10,277,400 10,277,400 10,308,240 30,840 Transfer from Surplus 510,000 765,093 1,465,053 2,013,050 547,997 Total, General Fund 79,963,140 80,121,543 80,926,853 81,481,375 554,522 Special Revenue Funds: Special Development Fund 11,730,400 11,844,802 11,887,593 13,803,980 1,916,387 Special Program Fund 2,300,000 4,981,249 6,419,866 8,830,975 2,411,109 Utility S Other Enterprise Funds: Water & Sewer Fund 40,660,130 40,270,130 40,270,130 37,152,500 -3,117,630 Gas Fund 21,811,540 21,811,540 22,133,660 23,421,320 1,287,660 Solid Waste Fund 14,627,030 14,677,030 14,910,940 15,024,940 114,000 Slarmwater Utility Fund 4,715,000 4,715,000 4,980,190 4,980,190 Recycling Fund 2,200,350 2,246,350 2,370,320 2,586,320 216,000 Marine Fund 2,163,600 2,163,600 2,423,600 2,683,600 260,000 Parking Fund 3,253,280 3,253,280 3,282,910 3,282,910 harborview Center Fund 2,164,170 2,164,170 2,164,170 2,164,170 Internal Service Funds: Administrative Services Fund 7,399,680 7,399,680 8,899,680 8,966,520 66,840 General Services Fund 2,880,180 2,908,380 2,908,380 2,908,380 Garage Fund 8,142,820 8,142,820 8,142,820 8,142,820 Central Insurance Fund 10,983,860 10,983,860 10,983,860 11,002,313 18,453 Total, All Funds 214,995,1 B0 217,683,434 222,704,972 226,432,313 3,727,341 Ordinance #6601-00 is EXHIBIT A (Continued) 1999-00 BUDGET EXPENDITURES First Third Quarter Mid Year Quarter Original Amended Amended Amended Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1999100 1999100 1999100 1999100 Amendment General Fund: City Commission 196,260 197,040 197,040 197,040 Administration 3,255,020 3,058,250 3,058,250 3,215,980 157,730 Legal 1,192,110 1,203,510 1,203,510 1,133,510 -70,000 City Clerk 1,053,920 1,061,680 1,061,680 1,061,680 Financial Services 1,841,610 1,866,240 1,866,240 1,814,790 -51,450 Human Resources 1,013,970 1,022,220 1,022,220 1,037,220 15,000 Police 25,971,230 26,155,960 26,155,960 26,155,960 Fire 13,462,340 13,680,490 13,680,490 13,680,490 Planning & Development Services 3,915,670 3,945,820 4,050,380 4,082,380 32,000 Public Works Administration 6,983,670 7,051,560 7,051,560 7,059,160 7,600 Parks & Recreation 12,331,200 12,422,710 12,438,460 12,448,460 10,000 Library 4,384,350 4,423.730 4,423,730 4,423,730 Marine - Pier 60 299,470 301,520 301,520 316,070 14,550 Marine - Sailing Center 141,000 142,400 142,400 142,400 Marine - Airpark 12,270 12,270 12,270 15,670 3,400 Non-Departmental 3,909,050 3,576,143 4,261,143 4,696,835 435,692 Total, General Fund 79,963,140 80,121,543 80,926,853 81,481,375 554,522 Special Revenue Funds: Special Development Fund 11,730,400 11,844,442 11,887,233 11,790,198 •97,035 Special Program Fund 2,200,000 4,881,249 6,319,866 8,730,975 2,411,109 Utility & Other Enterprise Funds: Water & Seger Fund 40,654,380 40,264,380 40,254,380 35,984,927. 4,279,453 Gas Fund 21,439,840 21,258,840. 21,478,980 22,732,990 1,254,010 Solid Waste Fund 14,624,780 14,624,780 14,782,480 14,854,380 71,900 Stormwater Utility Fund 4,688,940 4,688,940 4,980,190 4,867,690 -112,500 Recycling Fund 2,200,000 2,235,000 2,356,190 2,452,330 96,140 Marine Fund 2,032,160 2,032,160 2,282,160 2,532,160 250,000 Parking Fund 3,252,910 3,252,910 3,282,540 3,182,840 -99,700 Harborview Center Fund 2,163,800 2,163,800 2,163,800 2,163,800 0 internal Service Funds: Administrative Services Fund 7,338,130 7,338,130 8,838,130 8,904,970 66,840 General Services Fund 2,822,700 2,850,900 2,850,900 2,850,900 0 Garage Fund 8,049,280 8,018,880 8,018,880 8,018,880 0 Central Insurance Fund 9,526,450 9,526,450 9,526,450 9,526,450 0 Total, All Funds 212,686,910 215,102,404 219,959,032 220,074,865 115,833 Ordinance #5601.00 ORDINANCE NO.6602-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT AND BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, TO REFLECT AN INCREASE IN BUDGET EXPENDITURES TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF PROJECTS IN THE FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES OF POLICE PROTECTION, NEW STREET CONSTRUCTION, MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING, LAND ACQUISITION, BEAUTIFICKIZON, AND STORMWATER UTILITY AND TO REFLECT A DECREASE IN BUDGET EXPENDITURES TO REDUCE THE SCOPE OF PROJECTS IN THE FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES OF PARK DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS, GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS & EQUIPMENT, MISCELLANEOUS, WATER SYSTEM, AND SEWER SYSTEM, FOR A NET DECREASE OF $2,008,618; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Program Report and Budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000 was adopted by Ordinance No. 6458-99; and WHEREAS, unanticipated needs necessitate an increase in expenditures for the fallowing: Police Protection $23,085; New Street Construction $21,545; Miscellaneous Engineering $663,502; Land Acquisition $46,500; Beautification $50; and Stormwater Utility $413,249; and WHEREAS, funds of $3,993,911 are available to finance these projects through use of General Fund Revenues, Recreation Land Impact Fees, Grants - Other, Property Owners Share, Reimbursement from SWFWMD, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Grants, Stormwater Utility, General Fund Lease Purchase, Water & Sewer Bond Issue, and WHEREAS, Section 2.519 of the Clearwater Code authorizes the City Commission to provide for the expenditure of money for proper purposes not contained in the budget as originally adopted due to unforeseen circumstances or emergencies arising during the fiscal year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; Section 1. Section I of Ordinance No. 6458-99 is amended to read: Pursuant to the Third Quarter Amended Capital Improvement Program Report and Estimated Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1999 and ending September 30, 2000, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, the City Commission hereby adopts a Third Quarter Amended budget for the capital improvement fund for the City of Clearwater, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED September 21, 2000 Brian J. Aungst, Mayor-Commissioner A p oved as to form: am la K. Akin, City Attorney Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk ordinance #6602-00 ' t f ' f EXHIBIT A CAPITAL IMPROVEME NT PROGRA M FOR FISCAL YEAR 1 999100 First Qtr Mid Year Original Amended Amended Budget Budget Budget 1999100 1999100 1999/00 Amendments Police Protection 865,000 885,000 848,900 -36,100 Fire Protection 357,290 417,290 1,343,218 925,928 New Street Construction 0 0 0 Major Street Maintenance 4,215,400 4,215,400 4,215,400 Sidewalks: 450,000 450,000 450,000 .. Intersections 425,000 425,000 425,000 Parking 975,000 1,545,200 1,548,177 24"977 Miscellaneous Engineering 3,463,000 3,513,000 3,513,000 Land Acquisition 0 72,600 75,391 2,791 Beautification 0 0 0 Park Development 2,783,000 2,863,000 2,921,109 38,109 Marine Facilities 245,000 245,000 245,000 Libraries 709,520 912,210 912,210 Garage 2,694,600 2,629,734 2,629,734 Maintenance of Buildings 345,140 400,006 250,006 -150,000 General Public Buildings & Equip 106,000 106,000 -123,500 -229,500 Miscellaneous 715,500 1,165,746 1,925,746 740,000 Stonnwater Utility 3,126,900 1,868,381 1,837,381 -31,000 Water System 4,810,700 4,810,700 4,810,700 Sewer System 9,606,000 9,616,000 9,616,000 Gas System 1,488,390 1,488,390 1,488,390 Solid Waste 415,000 415,000 415,000 Utilities Miscellaneous 575,010 575,010 575,010 Recycling 303,000 303,000 303,000 TOTAL 38,694,450 38,961,667 40,224 872 1,263 205 Ordinance # 6602-00 EXHIBIT A (Continued) RESOURCES APPROPRIATED FOR CAPITAL. PROJ First Qtr Original Amended Budget Budget 1999100 1999100 6 GENERAL SOURCES: ECTS 1999100 Mid Year Amended Budget 1999100 Amendments General Operating Revenue 1,347,660 1,407,660 2,095,769 688,109 General Fund Retained Earnings 0 0 0 General Revenue/County Co-op 199,520 199,520 199,520 Special Development Fund 200,000 250,000 250,000 Community Redevelopment Agen 0 66,806 66,806 Road Millage 1,775,000 1,775,000 1,775,000 Open Space Impact Fees 0 21919 2,919 Recreation Land Impact Fees 0 69,681 72,472 2,791 Recreation Facillity Impact Fees 0 . 0 0 Transportation Impact Fees 310,000 310,000 310,000 Pennies l 3,225,000 3,225,000 3,188,900 -36,100 Pennies II 4,600,000 4,600,000 4,600,000 Development Impact Fees 125,000 125,000 125,000 Local Option Gas Tax 735,400 735,400 735,400 Grants - Other Agencies 0 0 0 FEMA 0 0 0 Pinellas County Commission 0 0 0 Property Owners Share 0 0 0 Interest 0 110,569 110,569 Donations 0 92,121 92,121 Other Municipalities 0 0 0 Reimbursement from SWFWMD 0 0 100,000 100,000 FI Dept of Envir Protection Grant 0 0 0 Florida State -Other Grants 0 100,000 100,000 Land Sales 0 0 0 Rental Fees 0 0 0 Insurance Reimbursement 0 0 0 SELF SUPPORTING FUNDS: Marine Operating Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 Parking Revenue 575,000 575,000 577,977 2,977 Harborview Center Revenue 0 0 0 Utility System; Water Revenue 1,196,100 1,196,100 11196,100 Sower Revenue 2,930,100 2,930,100 2,930,100 Reclaimed Water Revenue 190,000 190,000 190,000 Water Impact Fees 100,000 100,000 100,000 Water R & R . 950,000 950,000 950,000 Sewer R & R 825,000 825,000 825,000 Sewer Impact Feos 100,000 100,000 100,000 Utility R& R 0 0 0 Gas Revenue 1,488,390 1,488,390 1,488,390 Solid Waste Revenue 415,000 415,000 415,000 Stonnwater Utility 928,740 928,740 797,740 -131,000 Recycling Revenue 303,000 303,000 303,000 Grant - Reclaimed Water 1,695,700 1,695,700 1,695,700 Ordinance # 6602.00 1 EXHIBIT A (Continued) RESOURCES APPROPRIATED FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS 1999100 ' First Qtr Mid Year . Original Amended Amended Budget Budget Budget ' 1999100 1999100 9999100 Amendments INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: Garage Fund 117,000 117,000 117,000 Admin Services Fund 167,500 167,500 167,500 Central Insurance Fund 0 124,625 124,625 BORROWING - GENERAL SOURCES: Lease Purchase 1,539,340 1,414,715 2,201,143 786,428 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS; Lease Purchase - Parking 400,000 785,000 785,000 Leaa.Q Purchase - Sewer 58,500 58,500 58,500 Lease Purchase - Water 148,500 148,500 148,500 Lease Purchase - Stormwater Uti 284,400 284,400 284,400 Bond Issue - Stormwater 2,040,000 1,184,920 1,184,920 Bond Issue - Sewer 6,847,000 6,847,000 6,847,000 Bond Issue - Parking 0 185,200 185,200 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: Garage LeaselPurchase 2,727,600 2,727,600 2,577,600 -150,000 Admin Svcs Lease)Purchase 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL ALL FUNDING SOURCES: 38,694,450 38,961,667 40,224,872 1,263,205 Ordinance # 6602-00 •.?=:[y ?. '} :f' ;e, ,.4e, vi s' ' I?r ?r f . "I d'S 1 'k? ?ltt. ???77,, { ? r r ?al:4-:art, •-i?; ;.''.?,.:: .:.?;%:Ti'.q .7,'_,;:?,?' r. ,??..`:•' t:?• <i•°•L:i?,',,'j?,'{. .,f;.ta r ? ? ' ?!. i.!'f' ?4¢? vv Th; -?Y y' ' f?=?>. r!r 1°.• ;. -3, , ?i•'X. (' .7',s; i"'i:"°'• , ? fr ? :?' s v ?`i- •?"',. r t 8. i <r.f .!c ? ?:t I.'. t1t: `?+ - t? ,` e? '?f; s?'' ?. l f,v">?r .i: .PYe', P' Y 5 '!: " -;i. .:+••,^?.;?: ;inr ?r.y i.[.' gJ . xi i! s! !v ?,.,. •G? •} ?d FF .?i :?e:`.. :P,' F. r:ty-?F-{,':t? >x, :i?'?i",i,Ardr::;.=?^. {'•;F:,, ,.}?;ni;t,:t' i3, t.Iir. f?? '+'i: J? 5..:'I •. :ti.. t. E.? ? .. .I t Eer J?J.? 3 . ??,?`5 vw 1$§• i?fa` (. S r5' a??'i s{ t, S n'?S;'S? {,''I Y? {.}l.?J?j .? j' ,7 i:J:lr(,'. ?•.. i.. tr,1.. i,L?l ??YA"-.D I: e, '?:?_. ?°:i ?,. ?rr.rl . ?Y ?"Sr l,I:i '?,'' f.,{»" ira' ?,3f' ''V:.r?r'li .°f :F'y'ti ,'{i r'i`. :.r•?," :,?.,1.. . to 5 t, )i r ,F `??l: t?..sca' J.`.f,r ;t,• .r.•rn4 n ' ,". -fir., r7', I?: •4 'C? ,f , r:•' : i ?,e?e.;,?-.., i ?. ` s, , ,? }}Ili, F• f' •,f: ?<?. ryf:.,y .3si? 'lf i,•I? ry. .`f ',>•.?, .z.n{ ?.• s;_ ?=:r-r:cr'4: 'r:3'gl,,s?n .1.1, p -.ti'.'fn`,..{,? ?.<' 1, 7 ,s??e ?. ? ,Si, i:l." „1 ..1'' iF3 ! q..4' k.T, > 4' !,.`t ?Fl-?S}•', }??j ?? i• ?I'i .'1 i 11 `i -!: , l..Y,,?. ..?i '7„ F, .'i'.? .'b'.? ,# r?, ,.1. .><• ?:•a, r .F•S{'f`r" 1?. '•7 3, ?:'.? - . •?i 'F tli-. r.'?'„+?f'?'?}'iF.ye,: }'.. .-.I. r- w i:.iY'.. 1: :?':.. .,., nj.,. ,. ., - ,I' r , f f , ? , t - tit ACS"r' II'>t 1 ? - I ?. , 37 a W W r Q o t Q w r k Vn* $ 12 A',11 5 a a a3 a u '`u ?Su 3U-1 -8 ,t N N N N N r? `t??`?' y Q C C M 0.N 7L U ` 07 Cn uu ?/J M M p VVV a r7. 5 3 } N La I ? 1 ? i i f ? I .1 y 1 f 5 ? i ? i c ? l E i ; i ? i E /-7 Surplus List for October 5, 2000 MILEAGE/ REASON FOR 11M G UMBER YEAR DESCRIPTION SERIAL NUMBER HOURS _SURPLUS 1 DISPOSAL I G0112 1990 CHEVROLET CAPRICE IGIBL6478LA137084 86154 Age/ Condition 2 G0215 1987 FORD E150 VAN 1FTDE14H1HH883561 80,795 Age/ Condition 3 G0302 1985 FORD E260 VAN IFTFE24YXFHC27391 79,138 Age/ Condition 4 G0304 1989 FORD F250 UTILITY BODY IFTFF25Y5KNA17062 83,578 Aga/ Condition 5 G0318 1987 • FORD RANGER PU 1FTCR10A4HUD22873 44,000 Age/ Condition 8 60430 1988 FORD RANGER PU 1FTCR10A5JUE10076 64,416 Age/ Condition 9 G0521 1987 FORD F250 UTILITY BODY IFTHF25H7HN812529 74,543 Age/ Condition 10 G0546 1989 FORD E150 VAN 1t'TEE14Y5KHC41926 99,956 Age/ Condition 34 G0561 1987 RYAN 544844 SOD CUTTER 114700 NIA Age/ Condition 32 G0565 1988 RYAN 544844 SOD CUTTER 128053 NIA Age/ Condition 11 G0614 1991 TORO MOWER 30786-11049 2,127 Age/ Condition 12 G0628 1991 TORO REELMASTER 216 03410-10164 1,466 Age/ Condition i3 G0666 1989 FORD F250 UTILITY BODY 1FTFF25Y1KNB59425 77,060 Age/ Condition .14 G0694 1992 FORD RANGER PU 1FTCR10X7NTA72003 84,799 Age/ Condition 15 G0883 1993 GRAVELY 20G MOWER 635891 669 Age/ Condition 16 G0890 1994 GRAVELY 20G MOWER 250 1,262 Age/ Condition 17 G0892 1994 GRAVELY 20G MOWER 252 1,048 Age/ Condition 37 G0963 1984 EMGLO AIR COMPRESSOR 61984164 NIA Age/ Condition 18 G1010 1992 FORD F350 UTILITY BODY 1FDKF37H6NNA21851 86,304 Bad trans/A/C Inoperative 36 G1053 1992 EMGLO AIR COMPRESSOR A10298162 N/A Age/ Condition 20 G1095 1989 GMC 3500 UTILITY BODY , 1GDJR34K5KF703791 89,055 Age/ Condition 31 G1101 1992 HOMELITE GENERATOR HN0030037 N'-A Age/ Condition 21 G1112 1988 FORD E250 VAN 'IFTEE14Y4JHC22640 78,500 Age/ Condition 22 G1117 1992 CHEVROLET VAN 30 2GCFG35Z8N4151807 88,190 Age/ Condition 33 01223 1990 HOMELITE GENERATOR HK2820023 NIA Age/ Condition 35 G1234 1992 STONE•COMPACTOR 5011089 NIA Age/ Condition 23 01254 1986 FORD F250 UTILITY BODY 1FTHF25Y1GNA281110 43,883 Age/ Condition 24 G13138 1980 CLARK TRAILER 4958MA18878TT1030 N/A Age/ Condition 25 G1326 1983 DODGE VAN 2B4GB11HXDK348652 47,431 Age/ Body rusted 38 G1333 1980 SEARS GENERATOR 646046 NIA Age/ Condition 26 G1417 1994 GRAVELY 300 MOWER 310 2,152 Age/ Condition 27 G1719 1997 KAWASAKI MULE 550 JKIAFBC16VB501192 2,265 Frame rusted (beach vehicle) 28 G1720 1997 KAWASAKI MULE 550 JKlAFBC11VB501195 019 Frame rusted (beach vehicle) 29 G1721 1997 KAWASAKI MULE 550 JKlAFBC11VB501200 3,021 Frame rusted (beach vehicle) 39 G1722 1997 KAWASAKI MULE 550 JKIAFBC12VB501203 428 Frame rusted (beach vehiclo) 30 G1828 1997 EXCEL 2500 MOWER 7011687 503 Submerged in saltwater 40 None Unknown Sears shop vacuum NIA Not working 41 None Unknown Homelite 200kw generator NIA Not running 42 None Unknown Homelite 200kw generator NIA Not running 43 None Unknown 4hp Evinrude outboard motor NIA Surplus from Fire Dept 44 None Unknown 4hp Evinrude outboard motor NIA Surplus from Fire Dept 45 None Unknown sewer rodder attachment NIA Surplus from Public Services 46 None Unknown 2 trailer loads of pumps, NIA Surplus from Water Poll. Control motors, etc. Prepared by Joe Arrens Page 2 of 2 • Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item N: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve an Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement with Florida Gas Transmission of Houston, TX, in the additional estimated amount of $54,000; award a contract to Citrus Energy Services, Inc (CESI) in the estimated amount of $49,500; and award a contract to Motorfueler's Inc, of Clearwater in the amount of $161,542 to construct our gate station at Mitchell and Trinity Oaks Boulevard in Pasco County, © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Clearwater Gas System (CGS) has requested that Florida Gas Transmission Company (FGT) provide a new delivery point in Pasco County to insure a reliable supply of natural gas to our gas customers in the north expansion area. This was included in CGS's Strategic Plan. This new delivery point, call Trinity Gate Station, will provide a connection to the FGT Phase III gas transmission line that was built through Pasco County. This will provide an additional source of supply gas from another leg of the FGT transmission grid system, which will provide increased system reliability. • FGT will need to install 543 feet of high-pressure gas line from their existing tap to the gale station inlet at an additional estimated cost of $54,000, which includes a 10% contingency to cover any additional costs incurred during the project. The City Commission on 2118/99 approved the original Reimbursement Agreement, In the amount of $68,000. The amended total Is now $122,000. Special pipe will be used for the high-pressure side. In addition, each weld on the high-pressure pipe will have to be x-rayed because of 1,200 psi normal operating pressure. * Citrus Energy Services (CESI) will install 770 feet of low-pressure gas piping from the outlet of Trinity Gate Station to Clearwater Gas existing pipeline on Mitchell Blvd at an estimated cost of $49,500, which Includes a 10% contingency to cover any additional costs Incurred. CESI is owned by FGT and both companies will perform the Installation work at the same time. • FGT & CESI are the sole source providers for this construction. This is an extension of FGT's transmission pipeline and will be owned and operated by them; therefore, they require this to be built by their personnel. * CGS will contract to construct the rest of the delivery point gate station, in order to avoid paying a larger sum of money for grossing up the income taxes to FGT, which are currently 32.77%. Contributions in aid of construction under 118(b) of the Internal Revenue Code are considered income to FGT. The cost to perform this is part of bid #72-00, which is proposed to be awarded to Motorfueler's, Inc. of Clearwater in the amount of $161,542, which was the only sealed bid received. CGS will also provide the land, metering equipment, steel piping, valves and regulators necessary to reduce the pressure from approximately 1,200 psi to 60 psi, which Is compatible with our street pressures. All of the above items have already been authorized in previous purchase orders. • Monies were transferred in the (6) six-month budget amendment request adequate to cover this project. Funds were transferred from Project 353-96310, Pinellas County Mains & Services Extensions to Project 353-96314, Pasco County Gas Mains & Services Extensions. The total estimated cost of this project is $438,000. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Legal Info Srvc NIA Clearwater Gas System ' Brian Lan Mile Budget Public Works NIA User Dept. Purchasing DCNVACM NIA Clearwater Gas System Risk Mgmt Other NIA Attachments Submitted by: City Manager ®N°ne Printed on recycled Casts Total $265,042 Funding Source: Current FY $265,042 CIP xx OP Other ropriation Code: 353-96314-563ti00-532-000 Rev. 2/90 I1 Clearwater City Commission . , Agenda Cover Memorandum Work Session item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: 19 Award a contract to Pinellas County School System/Clearwater Adult Education Center, Clearwater, Florida, for provision of educational services, in an estimated amount of $75,000, in accordance with Sec. 2.564(1)(e), Code of Ordinances - Impractical to Bid ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • The Career, Technical and Adult Education (CTAE) division of the Pinellas County School System/ Clearwater Adult Education Center was selected by Clearwater in 1997 to provide educational services to community residents for the Weed and Seed program. Services include basic education classes; GED preparation assistance; career counseling to assist residents in identifying employment skills and aptitude; instruction in getting and keeping a job; and instruction in computer skills. CTAE also provides an educational coordinator who functions as a back-up instructor in addition to serving as the administrative manager for the program. • The program has been operating out of the Clearwater Police Department's North Greenwood Neighborhood Patrol substation. Earlier this year, a second location for the program was added at the new Foundation Village Neighborhood Family Center in South Greenwood. • CTAE's participation has been and continues to be critical to the program's success. Clearwater is now entering the fifth year of its Weed and Seed funding. It would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to maintain any kind of continuity or consistency to the program if it were necessary to re-bid and possibly change the provider of educational services for the upcoming grant period. It is therefore impractical to bid on the educational services required for the Weed and Seed Job Skills Center and Computer Learning Lab. • The total amount to be paid to CTAE is $75,000, which will include payment for provision of all educational services and an educational coordinator to supervise administration of the program during the period October 1, 2000 - September 30, 2001. • Funding will be provided by Clearwater's Weed and Seed FY 2000 Grant project, 1131-99323- 530300-521-000. Reviewed by: Originatin ?t: Police Costs ?; Legal 1 IZ Info Sn?c n/a Prepared by: Janet Skinner Total $75,000 Budget Public Works n/a User Dept. _ L ?11 Funding Source: Purchasing f DCM/ACM Police ? . Current FY $75,000 CI Risk Mgmt n/a Other n/a ' Attachments OP I'll Other Grant submitted by: 01 / I Appropriation Code: 181-99323-530300-521.000 ,City Manager ® None Weed and Seed grant funding Rev. 2/90 w w Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: ao 0? 5•Ud SUB) ECTlRECOMMENDATION: Award an Engineer of Record contract to Wade-Trim in the amount of $311,000 for the design, permitting and construction management of the North Greenwood Recreation and Aquatics Center, 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • Included in the 2000101 Capital Improvement Budget is a project for $4,000,000 for the construction of a new recreation and aquatics center in the North Greenwood Community. The center will be located on property, currently owned by the City, known as Ray Green Ballfield (SW corner of Palmetto and Greenwood) and several newly purchased lots located on Seminole Street. • The funding source for this project is Penny for Pinellas II, Numerous community meetings were held to develop the Penny's priority list and there is a strong citizen support to proceed with this project. • Two community meetings were held at Martin Luther King Center and a survey was distributed in the community to gather citizen input regarding the building aquatics program space. Results from these meetings were included in the proposal package that was used to solicit interested Engineers for the project. Additional community meetings will be held to update the community on the progress and plans for thb center. Two North Greenwood citizens will be selected to serve on the design committee for the Center. • Major elements will consist of a 27,500 sf building that will include gymnasiums (2), fitness center, multi-use classroom, control station/lobby, staff offices, conference room, restroomsllockers, storage circulation, mechanicaltelectric and a revenue component which could either be a gymnastics center, community day care center or aerobics/dance room -- performing arts auditorium. Also, a family aquatic's center consisting of approximately 5,000 sf of water surface area, pool deck and pool equipment building will be constructed. + Wade-Trim of Tampa Florida, was selected to be the lead firm on this project and will team with the architectural firm of Wannamacher, Russell Architects, Inc., of Saint Petersburg. Wade-Trim will provide the land survey, geotechnical investigation, permitting, and civil engineering; while Wannemacher, Russell will provide complete Architectural services for the building and aquatics center, threshold inspection and fire sprinkler engineering. The city will provide landscape and irrigation plans. Total cost of this contact Is approximately 8.4% of the estimated construction costs of $3,889,000. • The project design schedule calls for the bidding, permitting and contract negotiation to be completed by May 28, 2001 with the construction completed by May 29, 2002. Grand Opening will be June 2002. + Increased operating funds ($375,000) and staff (6.1 FTE's) will be needed to operate this facility. These expenses will be partially offset by increased fees and the revenue component of the center. Also, part of the increased revenue for this facility is to come from "play passes". Staff will be using "play passes" throughout the city. Reviewed by: Legal NIA Budget library q Engin. !1/ Gubmitted by: City Manager Ari?, r Into Srvc NIA Public Works NIA DCM/ACM QOl r? Originating Dept: Kevin Dunbar I User Dept. Parks & Recrea* Attachments: ? None Costs Total $311,000 Funding Source: Department Current FY OF X OF Other riation Code: 315-932 Rev. 21'16 - wRa Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: a? oa SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve locating the North Greenwood Recreation and Aquatics Center on Ray Green Ballfield (SW corner of Palmetto and Greenwood Ave) and the North Greenwood Branch library on Jack Russell Stadium Parking lot, ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • Included in the 2000101 Capital Improvement Budget is a project for $4,000,000 for the construction of the North Greenwood recreation and aquatics center. Funding to come from Pennies for Pinellas II. • In addition, in the 2000/01 Capital Improvement Budget is a project for $1,300,000 ($800,000 from Pennies, $500,000 from Library Grant) for the replacement/expansion of the North Greenwood Branch Library. • Preliminary plans included constructing both the recreation center as well as the library on the Ray Green Ballfield site. In order to accomplish this several additional lots adjacent to the balifield are being purchased. • There has been strong community support for both of these projects. However at two community meetings held at Martin Luther King Center and through a survey which was distributed in the community, staff gathered information that supported not constructing both of these facilities on the same site. In addition preliminary architectural designs show that the site would be very crowded and that the city would loose the playground area which Is heavily used by the surrounding residents. • Based on community inputstaff is recommending that the Branch Library be constructed on approximately one acre of the Jack Russell Stadium Parking Lot (7.5 acres). The Recreation and Aquatics center as well as the playground can be located on the Ray Green Ballfield site. (see aerial) • Since both of these sites are used as parking lots for Spring Training games, staff will be developing a new parking plan to accommodate the 2002 Spring Training needs. The 2001 Spring Training will not be affected. Reviewed by: Legal NIA Budget Library NJA Engin. NIA Originating Dept: Costs Info Srvc NIA Kevin Dunbar ' -Total NIA Public Works NIA User Dept. DCM/ACM Parks & Recreation De ment Current FY Attachments: omitted by: ty Manager ( 'rp '?J L - 1 0 None _ A ro riation Printed on recycl Funding Source: CIP OP Other Rev. 2190 11•?r' 1 .layi? ? I? '?I?i? ..? L ? dLr '#?i •? ' t '? A I 'yam 'r[ `• yirlY?'A'1T? • ,L-?,.{ '' ?•F?t ?l±+? ti,, w-'s?e?•-'? :y!.rYt.YR•, y ? '? 1\.1 ' ?' ?r'T?a°s.i?4 ?r Y 1 s? y??k tiX r' '? ?J. 1?:•..1}?f{ Itw .fir ?'.' •'7 j •}., '? r jJ u ke, (1 ?: '?; }7, :SS,'.-?_`1?4Y` ,:.."'°.i.:?:rTe?:'M:•:-c? ? I ?J ,?• h• ?• 'Ii i-'.`'•?x?rY •?•n0 -a'! ?'.???.r? '?''YF?'?j? ? .1 P ?• ?r'.? ?L .?JrrJ.: a t w? rr'• ? I '? 4w'fY`.?;,lj?i+." t .+,." a ? `11 . ` .. 1N'•, r.7 •# ? ? 1. f?.Jn ::d''.:di?:'JJ,ti .':......a:' ` ?. • r~^• ?. ???""'Lf . `p, ;{ t .? Ins' Jf' .... .1r, ?+Jt. .. '•??'- ` ?f .. 1? ':r.. ?' '?? , , ?? ?'?'!'g ii .j I ' } !,'';, ?' ,Ll,?'?7 ' Q ?J t,?Yl i ,Y_f ? * ?•Y[ _ . r>•T,..?-• ...wr.w.-, •. w.r.?R ..r `-."' - et_ q + - 1 H S..t ...y`i• ~ 1 77- PlsR• w ? ? • .y ?r??':?rry.. •"•T?. ?? n ?s i ??71?'w t?..•w, l? ! r `J1? 1n ] y •. !t f1S$ y?5 '-'riytr iF?11"t, :•v ? .? ??? ??. Y '?'''• ;"•? ,' II ?? ?F •r?' ? 1' ,' l? 'i . ???+i'!?{(,,y' ??F)Ti?..I?I?:Jriha?.:: '1-4+ r?y?-?."r} ? '??.,rt t'3t Y,.'+ J,, ? I J ' ^_ r ??•. ?• y ?1t• -'?' rr '?''?` ,'M_ '?(? {f...'?%`%?".'•T?[?'b ?5??4+?.'7W`i.:f` _ i.?t •?i r:r r":1 fT:?.rsf •' `` '?r"11 ? {' 't! ?? ?I'. i...'?:'"1,J ? i ,`'E 1 ? ? ??? .t:'{,..r;;l?1.i`???(,. 7•' r ?iF:' • 1'3R,?' 'f?'`:??'. ay J r. _., .. ? ??:.........•.?ti?.?...?t, !? .t?? I? ?..:'RaJ .Z'.?,`1?•'M ' ? - i' ? rye I ~ '4• a ? S ,{ '?,?YtF+C. 1 _.,,,?, 3r•': { t+?w ? r t!?J` r?ry+m ?... ?k _ r •t-r t, ? i ? ?1 9 ..!•,, .~ C °?,. .."S. '/..`j.'T, .`K i,°.` ??`''-!tom { ir; i ,.:1.? " E. '• f r „•• ???'- a ?' ? ? :\ ?, L r ''>?:',t•?'?;,?y?.??E"iJ,?ij ?' ?'?•?' k' `i'? ?l? fI{yam ? r---" _?..-' ? ?? ? ? :s. ;,;s+. ?nCr;-?.. ..PirA' tri ??rz .? r.?,, . • l"+"'^. x: ..;`? ? . • '?l . yf1'.+..•,: II`[.? '..''4,'.N,I•. ?A•ll•L•'?i„1?-1';•.r?5+.4.??• irj?+?}i,???/.,=':.C?+g ? ??h-,?Y .'?1 '?`1??•,r ', ?'? iEi f ?4 • I,) t. r' ?1:r„i .a,rF.. ,{ ?a ,..r r, i -:.('`,?•'1?;.%;?.f?' •r y'•;i .?'' ?WWP ?. ?t'I.' f •N "k' ?F l )S'{ ;I r ? ,r • _. -.j,- r i- tir•,:w t ?' -.t' ',Cl:?'? ^f-;- . i ?' ,? j, -__ r.'?sb -?,L'jy. ? p:?};'fi:n'•'3i'*„?'L-Ttf7 •',?*?•' ?'? `r?'t'•?t:n.'? ?,,?.J '7? t:•S'?'., ? r '' ?„i :. ? ? ?A ?ii`?. w•-??r"?' .?r?w ?h.7 .?.t:! s?lw •+v ?wa 1? 7.r r.-.r.r••?.??xJls.t.>zerar0'ii.dir.?'?..s: i„....:i? : r. ?l, i?r.n....?...+,..r y?r TYh' .;y?.r.? ;1r<xM 'T• 1!['?„9.?`{t?gTn ?..? ? 1 t ?'?" a i`"r ? . ??? . ?.• ?`?:?,` ?- `?• 14 I ~ r f 1 i I L.Z11 lid -. ., C.?.?w 'f...? •, aim ;!? ID ? ~. ,?St Pwti Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: 1015100 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Joint Participation Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation which provides funding of project costs of up to $150,000 to fund.a study to evaluate a proposed guideway (light rail or other technology) linking Clearwater Beach and downtown Clearwater, to determine its technical feasibility and economic contribution to revitalization. 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. • In 1999 Clearwater applied for funding to study the feasibility and desirability of a guideway linking downtown Clearwater and Clearwater Beach to support economic development. • Funding was recommended for approval by the Governor's Fast Track Committee, the Secretary of Transportation and the Governor and was awarded by the Legislature during the 2000 Session. • This study will determine project technical feasibility, contribution to economic revitalization of Clearwater Beach and downtown Clearwater, and compatibility with community vision.. If the cdncept appears to be viable by these three criteria, another grant would be sought for more detailed engineering work. Because the next grant cycle comes before the study is to completed, funding would be sought on the basis of preliminary study results. • This Agreement represents 100% of the estimated total project cost of $150,000. There are no matching funds. A 1" Quarter FY 2000101 budget amendment will establish project 315-92831, Clearwater Beach 1 Downtown Clearwater Guideway Project, funded by $150,000 from the FDOT. • The Agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. Reviewed by: Legal - )?? Budget Purchasing -NLA_ Risk MUmt NA Into Srvc NIA Public Works DCMIACM PDS 4JA ?!? Submitted by, City Mnnager Prn recycled paper Originating Dept: ? Costs: None Public Works Admirfis4tion Total NIA User Dept. 14 Public Works Adm1hist?ation Attachments None Current FY Funding Source; CI oil Othr Rev. 2/90 Clearwater City Commission Worksession Item #: 0 Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: 1015100 SUBJECTIRECOMMENDATION: Approve the Engineer of Record Work Order for Engineering Services to Wade-Trim, Tampa, conditional upon approval by the Florida Department of Transportation, in the amount not to exceed $145,000 to study a proposed guide ' way (light rail or other technology) linking Clearwater Beach and downtown Clearwater, to determine its technical feasibility and contribution to economic revitalization. and that the appropriate offcials be authorized to execute same. • This Agenda Item directs staff to initiate the study of the Clearwater Beach / Downtown Clearwater Guideway Project, to be entirely funded by a Joint Participation Agreement with Florida Department of Transportation. • The project scope includes: Data Review Develop preliminary routings and station locations Develop evaluation criteria and methodology Evaluate routings/stations locations Develop operational scenario and patronage projection Organize and conduct public visioning workshop Cost analysis Develop action plan Prepare report • The project is being funded by a grant from the Florida Department of Transportation. • The Work Order is available in City Clerk's Office. Reviewed by: Legal Info S:vc {VIA Budget public Works l urchasi DCMIACM' Risk Mgmt N!A PD5 Originating Dept: Public Works Adm t ion .(Kett SLGs)_, User Dept. Public Works A*4tration Attachments None Costs: Total $145,000 Curren $145,000 t FY Funding Source: Cl X oi' Othr Submitted by: { Appropriation Code Fity Manager v 315-92831-56130()-539-000 -Printed on recycled pa Rev. 2/9B ' Clearwater City Work session Item #: Commission Final Agenda Item #t L4 Agenda Cover Meeting Date: 10/05!00 Memorandum SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for Restroom and Shower Facilities at the Clearwater Municipal MaHna (45 Causeway Blvd.) (00-0011-MA) to Oakhurst Construction Company, Inc. of Seminole, FLORIDA for the sum of 5101, 310.00 which is the lowest responsible bid received in accordance with the plans and specifications, 19 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: To provide a more convenient facility for visiting boaters, the old Starlight Majesty office building at the east end of the marina will be turned into a new restroom and shower facility. The work will include but not be limited to equipment, materials, electrical, plumbing, labor and all necessary permits to completely renovate the existing building. In order to fund this project, a first quarter amendment will transfer $101,310.00 of unappropriated retained earnings of the marina fund to capital improvement project 315-93493, Marina Restroom Renovations. • This project will start as soon as possible after award and execution of contract, and is scheduled to be completed within 60 calendar days. Reviewed by: Legal Iff 1 Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt N/A Originating Dept: Info Srvc N/A Public Works-kA Administratioh' Public Works PIYL User Dept. DCM/ACM Marina. Other Attachments err s Costs $101,310 Total Submitted by: City Manager 107Printad on recycled Rev. 2/98 -f Current FY X Funding Source: Cl X OP Other _ I Appropriation Code f? None 315.93493-563600-575.000 Restroom and Shower Facilities - Clw. Municipal Marina,& W Y ' ' m o' . 5? ;?4?ryrytitnGA???irrr C:z? X lCO z ? ?U? =O. 10 Uf IrO ? 7 I SN N N t I I ` ?? i .7 O ?? I 1 t ? {bl i ffv Ib! ?G) !O ;00 M!!m i I ly I I $ iml? ` n?'i ,v uy $• I$. $ Loo, 0. = -;? 144; N(A3N 14A 4 ,A Ao CIO 14. z$ I- E 1 w ?.rta; a ' 'm I i $1815}$ I " Jw '40* 4A 'U'o mm q a n' o i ! I ?o' ;g III$ ?ml Z wI 4A: M' 4M 3 I? (-J ?4 iz t o ' I ' ?' I IPIatV EN ?? ;CIr= lZ'?CA" I ` f ' ! j , rXll 'C ?A 1!4 't En C4 ` I t i S; $ $ mI !a i ; i iAII?. C ? r Imo, C) . Ea I N iN x4 ? I? I ? E I ice. , Sef ,?Jh I ? ? ? Ig' .$ ?$ Imp m ? _I._. ..J • - _ F4A 1N; IA N i t i? m!`?I I .01P fm=v .+?? .? iCir• i i I I tgl5'Si5 ,$ ~? n , 11A I- a. O I 1 J I I Imo; i y r m I 10 ! I81 S $ m'z ' -0 0 x •i' I :N.N -Al IA N ' I jIN, y4 ,CI li rR o? Pw Clearwater City ConuWsston Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item N: Final Agenda Item # .b 6 Meeting Date: SUBJECTIRECOMMENDATION: i Approve an Agreement with Pinellas County to provide funding of protect costs of up to $39,676 for the South Beach Reclaimed Water project, M and that the appropriate officials be"authorized-to execute same. This Agenda Item is part of the continued development of reclaimed water utilization in the City. In January 1995, Pinellas County implemented a program called Contribution-in-Aid-of-Construction, intended to assist communities in building reclaimed water facilities to reduce consumption of potable water. The County has offered financial assistance of up to $39,676 for the South Clearwater Beach project. This amount is based on one dollar per gallon of potable water supply capacity estimated to be saved. The estimated savings are based upon County estimates of 126 gallons per day saved by residential customers, and 359 gallons per day for commercial customers. Since the City plans to connect 76 residential and 86 commercial customers as a result of this project, the total funding available is $39,676. I' In the event the City does not supply reclaimed water to all the customers estimated, the remaining balance of funds must be returned to the County. The City must execute this Agreement prior to the notice to proceed (NTP) of the construction portion of the project. This funding for the South Beach Reclaimed water project is in addition to co-funding of $375,004 provided by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), The construction cost for this project was bid at $1,412,695 by Keystone Excavators and will be presented to the Commission for approval as a separate agenda item. I Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs Legal Info 5rvc NIA Public Works Administration Total NIA Budget Public Works- User Dept. Funding Source: Purchasing NIA DCMIACM Public utilitie aterlAndy Neff Current FY CI Risk Mgmt NIA Other Attachments OP r _ - Othr Submitted by: City Manager Printed on recycled Rev. 2198 as AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the _ day of , 2000, by and between PINELLAS COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, acting by and through its Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the ".`COUNTY", and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, a municipal corporation within said Pinellas County, acting by and through its City Commission, hereinafter, referred to as the "CITY". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the CITY receives potable water from the COUNTY through wholesale purchase agreement; and WHEREAS, the CITY and the COUNTY are committed to the conservation of potable water through use of reclaimed water; and WHEREAS, the CITY has or will commit to installing and maintaining reclaimed water facilities to serve residential areas within the CITY which shall reduce the potable water supply capacity the CITY requires from the COUNTY utility system; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 1995, the COUNTY established a Contribution-in- Aid-Of-Construction Program, intended to assist communities in building reclaimed water facilities to reduce consumption of potable water purchased from the COUNTY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the monies hereinafter agreed to be paid and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereby mutually agree as follows: I of3 1. The CITY is proposing to build the South Beach'Reclaimed Water Project, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT", to provide reclaimed water to residents within a portion of its Reclaimed Water Service Area. 2. The CITY commits to connect 76 residential units and 86 Commercial units to the CITY's reclaimed water system in the PROJECT, within two and one half (2 112) years of issuance of the Notice to Proceed for construction of the PROJECT. These residents are receiving potable water from the CITY's water system. 3. The COUNTY will pay to the CITY, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a copy of the Notice to Proceed for construction of the PROJECT, the "not to exceed" sum of THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY-SIX DOLLARS ($39,676.00) as a County Contribution-in-Aid-of-Construction for the PROJECT, based upon ONE ($1.00) DOLLAR per gallon of potable water supply capacity estimated to be saved. The estimate of potable water supply capacity saved is 0.01 NICI). The amount of potable water supply capacity saved is estimated by multiplying the number of residential units connected in the PROJECT by 126 gallons per day and the number of commercial units connected in the PROJECT by 350 gallons per day. In the event the number of residential and commercial reclaimed water connections estimated by the CITY for the project do not occur within the period established in Paragraph 2, the CITY will reimburse the COUNTY a pro rata portion of the Contribution-in-Aid-of- Construction corresponding to the shortfall in the number of residential and commercial reclaimed water connections by the CITY. Any reimbursement to the COUNTY shall be due within sixty (60) days of receipt of written request f'or reimbursement from the COUNTY. 2 or3 as 4. The term of this agreement is for a period of three (3) years after receipt of' the copy of the Notice to Proceed for the Project from the CITY as per Paragraph 3, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the month, day and year first above written. Countersigned: Brian J, Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: J e C. Hayman ssistant City Attorney ATTEST: KARLEEN F. DeBLAKER Clerk of Circuit Court By: Deputy Clerk I Approved as to form Office of County Attorney By: Attorney CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: William B. Horne, II Interim City Manager Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Cleric PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Acting by and through its Board of County Commissioners By: Chairman G:IUSERSNWPDOCSIAWS\ADNIIN\PX-CI.AIh4Clcleurcoii6iald.duc '" 3 of 3' Clearwater City Commission Work session Item #: Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item 0 Meeting Date: 10105100 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve award of the South Bench Reclaimed Water Distribution System (99-0073-UT) to Keystone Excavators, Inc. in the amount of $1,412,695.00, which is the lowest responsible bid received in accordance with plans and specifications, 19 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. Q • SUMMARY: a This item is a continuation of the development of an expanded reclaimed water system in the City of Clearwater. The purpose of this contract is to construct a reclaimed water system expansion in the South Clearwater Beach area to serve the residents and businesses with reclaimed water for non-potable use. The project consists of approximately 6,700 linear feet of 12" transmission pipeline, and approximately 16,700 linear feet of 8", 6" and 4" distribution pipeline. The construction contract time is 300 days. • This project is being funded in part by a grant from the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Tile Cooperative Funding Agreement between the City and the Water Management District includes reimbursement of 50% of the cost of transmission facilities up to a maximum of $375,000.00. In addition, funding in the amount of $39,676 from Pinellas County will be used on this project. The City is funding; the balance of project costs of $998,019.00 from Water/Sewer/Reclaimed Water Revenues. There is adequate funding in Capital Improvement Project 96739 (Reclaimed Water Distribution System). • The distribution pipeline construction on this project will be installed by the directional drill technique. This is being done to minimize the impact of construction on the residents in the project area. The transmission pipeline will require open-cut excavation through parts of the south end of Clearwater Beach. • This project is consistent with the City of Clearwater's Updated Reclaimed Water Master Plan. Reviewed try: Legal 5'trBudget Purchasing olw_ Risk Mgmt bIIL- Submitted by. City Manager Originating Dept: info Srvc NIA Pubik: Works Administration Costs $1,412,695.00 rE icn Miirrinl -1 1 Total Public Works DCMIACM Other NIA User Dept. -.7r. Public Works Admi istration Funding Source: Current FY Cl Attachments OP Other Appropriation Code: d None 315- 96739-5631100.533-000 Printed on recycled p per So. Beach Reclaimed Water 10-05-00,1m.dac Rev. 2190 1 Y II N Y K I L 3 3t SI ? 37 Il ? tl i li J x 3 r G G ? E3 " • '+ w N r Y u ? i f I i ? -1 zr- - ti j ri ? 'i 4 ii f 4 1 -? 1 r _ ? Y ? ? w r 1 1 Q Q Q ? q Y f Q6 r ? ? g r 4 4 w w 11 M N] N N w w 'w ri1 {i w r ?` * A l N N K < ?' G tie G •.•-• N B NN N N M N N N N M N N N N N N N M N N M N N N N N N M Y + ? ? ? ' Y ? Y k? ? H M I ? } IS ? ? 1 A ? } .y K ' rQ ? 1J ? ? Q4 a U ? » ? u B N N M M ? &_ 4 M M N 1G R N S w » C N 8 M ? 8 N : 4 N M i C N N t1S N N N M 15 iA N N N f G N J N i R N N P L a N N ?3 c N N N - M L N : N B N p ?- i a V a t MMM In r v Y j y Y Y ? ? O ? ? ? L ? ? N ? yr, Y N ? {. rar }r?1 !A?! RYR '•Y[' }A? !1 F r Y + Yr Y N ?t8 8 ?? B?? ^ >S tS R 8 6 88 8$ 438 Kctf 8 6 8 8 S L ? 8 8 8 s 8 :8 1 8 L a N M N M N N N N N N N« N N N N M N N N N N N N N « N M N N N ? n V 4 Y H N t t U .? O u .l Y v t. w i ?F a H W 9 A tl Y H a o w ? m n B 8 8 8 8 8 8 B 8 8 a 8 8 8 B' s H S H H 6 8 8 a S a 8 V 8 8 B L 8 8 8 n M M N M N M N N M N N N N N M N N N N N Y N N M N Y N N N N « N N } r B yLy'p6J Y kk A .+'y?? ?+ 1 L?6y?+(' 0 ry f.+' ?J ? 6 ?.' yy?r+ 0 {??{ RpR 0 yyQ66S 0 g: [] gY O #I?.' {n6 4 9 : y Rtl ? R r tY ? I Q ?+ u ? rL+ u ?S 4 V 8? O I??. P BY fi ,? r p }S+ ? P gn P g?' 9 1y??? tl f[r?? 6 ? Y F w ? ? r S l'? ? ? }? [RF O '+ ? ? ? L Y 8 8 81 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 H 8 8 8 8 B 8 R B 8 a 8 B 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 _ {y l r B N N N M ? N + e N M N N w M N M M N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ N N w M N N N M N N N ? ? T C •NY/ $ O ? j n V F If ? I ? ? ? O O V ? ? ? G 9 1 P '? ? g B O g C ? `, FI N I? ? B 8 P w .( 1S :? ? ? ?` ? g ?i B B B 8 8 H $ S 3 8 8 8 2 a 2 a a a 8 8 4 8 H 8 a a 8 9 8 H 9 8 8 9 8 _ $ ' N N N N - w w « N N N N w « w w M w « N N ?1 !" ? I? pp NNp q? P ? pNp ? (! ? NA {S? j{ :? p r ? ??a= ? J?! eRN+ 3 l?{ {N? (? R? /?? y?? p l+ '. p ? ? }i ?y1 f{{1 ? ? ? ? S tl ? ? tl ? I S 7 S 2F i! t! 2S Ci t l M = S a v b a K 6 tS K ? n K tS t3 !S tf ? ? ? 74 tl XB B & 8 a 90 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 a u a a6 8 8 8 9 8 B 6 8 8 8 8 8 88_ 8 _8 8 T P N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N M M N r N Y N N M N N N W ? ? B ? R ra i; ? ? G ? 1S 8 !Q F ? ? J 13 4 ? ? p! ? IS ? a $ Y a ? ? j R 8 ! 3 8 8 8 S i; 8 8 6 8 86 8 8 86 8 3 6 13 R B 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 4 8 8 8 t w M w M M N N N w N N N M N « N M N w N « M N N M N N « N « N N N r N N . N N N C 8 -+ C y r r . L LI Q `3 C '? $ N N R N Si S ?+ i! N. S r. r r r y 8 6 8 8 8 8 $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 $ 8 6 6 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 8 8 8 H 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 B H 8 8 8 5N i 2 s . M ? ? G w L a ? ? G w xt1 w r; « w N F? w g w ': It is M N S N N M it N 1t N >? « 6 N N ?n N ? N iC y I? ? } B 8 B H3 3 3 8 8 8 8 6 68 8 6 88 B H S_ 8 _ B 8 8 K x 8 6 $ 8Y e_ 6 8 y¦ y? C z af p w C v 1 n N ] M N a N M N N N ? N ? N +. N u N u ' N di N« « N N N « u N ? a M J N+ !' N ? N N ?' N ' d 1S .? + ` N N p V « + N ? « ? • }{ r y M p O ?. { V g E (? u x fl n 1 u ? O S R 9 9 9 k 9 B 4 u ? 4 4 N ?i ! x f a ?$ 1f B P { j O b rl t? 8 68 8 3 3 3 8 83 $ B B 8 8 8 6 88 8 8 88 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8_ 8 6 6 8 6 8H 8 8 S ? N N M N N N N M M N « N N N N M ? +? Ny ? ? „p8 O V ? y a O » GR? ? O M r Y 4? ( ?I } !? ? [? { S 1r .Yi ` `: ? !? S ? ? .«i Y a 1I -+ r? Yw LS {1.55, CI w w ? 6 !? t? Q u ? 1? V V V a p H 3 H HH >3 $ 8 6 $ 8 8 $8 9 8 66 8 8 6 9 _ 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 831 8 8 8 Y M r r N M N N M N N M N N N M M N N N a r F a g r y a it ft E 88 a 8 8 >1 8 a8 a 8 8 a 8 B 8 88 8 a aa 8 8 6 8 a 8_8 8 B B H $ 843 8 8 !3 T M N N N N N w N M N « N N M N N M M M N N N N N M N N N u q p +1 y c ? q Y + 3 B 8 8 8 K 4 H 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 B G a B B B L" J 8 H H R a 8 H _B r w N « « N N N N N N N N N N « w N « N N N N N N N M N N « N N N ` u d R Id ti . r FL 3? f• N .. + ?+ S a 9 9 9 9 8 s 8 3 6 H H $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 8 8 H H 8 8 8 8 8 Dv? 2 . "d Ta: t"i''•a;l?? `{e•..is??7 j., fa:': °g'•',i? ;>>.>'•'.rJ?: 1?P':r:'; r',' t 'ti .. , ?•r:. i?nd'. "r;1: .' ?1•?'j'?'?,.:; da:?'.'': ,u:?.l' .. t? FI ? - •• .. '1 - y,i:' rte' ;F.4; i(?°• JF' =l?ri'. ,y'r1 :??V?'i 1 •t' ., r) - ' r` ' ?I ' ? • ... ? ! ' ?k?`h.a:i ?j[': (.!?'?`1 Kt-'°.??•._?!+ '. a Cs if' . . 11?. ?ai ? ? 7,• ta?j -t I '?, Q??,,((tt ,TV ? ;. .yr' 4 , t.(:. '.} ? :r: r'I. .. ; ? ?{ . 1vT' '?T ?'i sLr.'r; ?''f' `.»'f •SFr,i lY? .'M1 'i.t??}if \'?'t??.-`...f?',r i = .f .. , t j?_{{?. 'Fk ?.?' i.?t y?,? °`??'? w:???{ds ?aY }?kf. :i .n 1:F;?F!. ??? 4?fa?s;''(n. y;; fd ?.?,+ %t= ,,h•::ii':°:_{?i:i ?:f, (°1 ?Eci?i•: <! :r??:.? - ? ;?>> j.? ., Orb i? ? "Il':? !,? ? ?+? •??T rf:. '?. tl -A. ° S•F .• ?.?I '4? ti. yt?t '.'1'?.?.. ./l, •l.?I 1'.ta•1 ..j: "? e? " i?w. . a{ ? l:l° •i?t` '?' ?};h(;e?i :,,?'>" pf?-a ."?`?:'i1'ei• s '•7 .1':r .; }s ?• .4: ?::. .F: ? y..s ;Fet. i°c •?? 4.!' ¢ ti"ti?.rr ?C ,?' T,?aa i°r•q1??I,k.J,C-,?: ?>. i•x'f?'?`',j'?N'•r?-.? :(fir i? S'.!o.r ',i' '?';:.:.. .?1: 'r l.`? '•j- ?•s•',eh. .. ;r. ???{.. 1 f .dl°:.'„d ?7'.. ,r+ . ?y/ r111 ?•f 1, •,l?I? •'t i'.? ?tl: •'!'''°Y t , ' i„ ?¢k?id.E[L3.,5 ???[{.rya:'.A,Il4JJ?K'•32:-s.?xj??i?,r'y,"1.?..SSini•a•i?: :V?S.t .?1:9?.?i;i.1, 1,.2'.4 r .':'! • . . . :.??- a ., .... ,. . . .• t ?" x.55 ?. .. . . . ....., .. , . t e, 27, f 3q? Worksemion Item C lea.rwaterCity Cm=ission Agenda CuverMemorandum Final Agenda Item # r" Meeting Date: • dV SUBJECTIRECOMMENDATION: Approve a one year Lease with Pinellas County for the use of City parking lot #15, 111 Pierce Blvd., located on the west side of the City Hall Building; IF R3 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute sarne. SUMMARY: v Pinellas County is in the process of constructing a parking garage at their Northwest Parking Lot, 310 Court Street, and is desirous of leasing temporary parking during construction. ' • City parking lot #15 has 63 unmetered parking spaces with very low usage. o The County will use this as Reserved parking for county employees and county vehicles. Access to the overfiow parking for City flail and the tennis court facility will remain available through lot #15. • The term of the. Lease is 1 year with month to month renewals for a sum of $945.00 per month. e Either party may terminate the Lease with a 60 day written notice. • A copy of the Lease Agreement is available for review in the City Clerk's Office. Revlevved by: Legal Budget NIA Purchasing Risk Mgmt xnitted by: y Manager Printed on r Originating Dept:. Iyti Info Srvc NIA PWAIParkingll". Bruch Public Works User Dept, DC M/ACM PWA!Parklng System Other Attachments Lease 0 None Coals Total NIA Funding Source: Current FY NIA CIP OP Other Code: Rev. 2188 :s i Clearwater City Commission Work session Item Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Dato: 10105/00 SU BJ ECTI RECOM M EN DATI O N : Award a contract to Altec Industries, Inc., Birmingham, AL in the amount of $57,126 for the purchase of one 2001 Ford F450 utility truck with Altec AL32 aerial lift in accordance with Section 2.564(1)(d) Code of Ordinances - GSA Contract GS-30F-1028G; increasing the Capital Improvement Program project budget from $38,000 to $57,126; authorize funding under the City's Lease Purchase Agreement; ® and that the aoarogriete officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • This will be an additional vehicle for the PWA/Public Services/Urban Forestry division that will enable trimming beneath the tree canopy. o Originally included as a lease purchase project in the FY2000 CIP budget (Project 315-92825) with an estimated cost of $38,000. Original specifications called for a Ford F350 that General Services/Fleet Maintenance later determined to be undersized for high-lift operations in Urban Forestry. For this purpose the F350 utility bucket truck is less safe than the F450 and will likely experience more frequent mechanical trouble. +Current operating budget includes estimated debt service of $8,450 based upon the original planned vehicle cost of $38,000. Budget savings within Urban Forestry or from other PWA General Fund cost centers will fund the $4,700 increase in estimated debt service in FY01. Reviewed by: Legal Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt NIA submitted by, City Manager Info Srvc N/A Public Works hL DCMIACM Other NIA General Svcs-?k,4,. originating Dept: 7n Costs PW Adminl(G. Johnso) Total 357.126 User Dept. ?ri Funding Source: PWA1Public Services Current FY 513.154 CI _X_ Attachments OP X Other Appropriation Code: ? None 315-92825591000.581-000 Printed_on_pegffe-d paper Rev. 2198 ' Clearwater City Commission work session Item 1 ,J Flnal Agenda Item # Agenda Coder Memorandum Meeting Date: 1015100 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve amendment to the Cooperative funding agreement with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) for the Stevenson Creek Watershed Management Plan (WMP) to change the effective date of the Agreement to March 6, 2000, © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.' SUMMARY: • The City Commission approved the Stevenson Creek Watershed Management Plan and necessary funding of $600,000 on March 2, 2000. • An agreement providing for the SWFWMD funding $220,000 of the cost was executed effective May 22, 2000. • This agenda item amends the City of Clearwater's agreement to be effective as of March 6, 2000 in order to receive payment from the District to the City for work completed between March 6, 2000 and May 2, 2000, Reviewed by: unginaung uepu -}'L Costs legal Info Srvc NIA Engineering Elliot Shobe g TOW 600,000 Budget h i -?i Public Works ? User Dept. i E i Funding Source: Purc as ng A DCNVACM neer ng ng Current FY Cl X Risk Mgmt NIA Other Attachments OP Other submitted by: None City Manager Appropriation Code: 375-96129 561200-5 3 9-0 00 Printed on resyel<paper Rev. 2198 !; . . Clearwater City Commission Work session item #: Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # .30 Meeting Date: 10105/00 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Ratifv and confirm the 12/27/99 agreement with Meristar Hospitality Operating Partnership, LP (Hilton Clearwater Beach Hotel), approve payment to them in the amount of $34,550,34 for replacement of property adversely affected by construction of the Clearwater Beach Roundabout, ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same._ SUMMARY: Design and construction of the roundabout project eliminated one of the entrances and necessitated changes to the hotel property adjacent to the roadway. An agreement approved by City legal staff and signed by the City Manager and Medstar Vice President, Legal, Christopher Bennett on 12127/99 stipulated that the City would reimburse Meristar for expenses incurred in replacement of access to the hotel, landscaping, irrigation system and relocation of the hotel sign. . a This agreement prevented a lawsuit and the possibility of a court ordered settlement. d There are sufficient funds in the Gateway to the Beach (348-92148) capital improvement project to make this payment. Reviewed by: Legal t Budget Purchasing rl-lk Risk Mgmt NIA Submitted by: City Manager i Printed on me paper Originating Dept: •-)f -`i' costs Info Srvc NIA P W Admin/(K. Bush) Total $34.550.34__ Public Works `WL User Dept. Funding Source: DCMIACM Public Works Administration Current FY $34.550.34 Cl x -_ _ Other Attachments OP Other Appropriation Code: 348.92148.583700-541-000 hilton pymt agenda doc pw io Clearwater City Convnission Work session item #: Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # 3 01 Meeting Date; 10105/00 SUBJECTIRECOM M ENDATION: . Establish one additional full time employee, Heavy Equipment Operator III in Stormwater Utility with an annual cost of $29,800. ®... and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • An additional Mechanical Street Sweeper, capital project 315-96132, has been approved as a 4'" quarter lease purchase in the current fiscal year. The Heavy Equipment Operator position was not identified as a need in the adopted rate study and existing staff is insufficient to operate the additional street sweeper. • This position would be responsible for the sweeping of beach and downtown streets and parking lots thereby replacing the $127,980 sweeping contract with Sweeping Corp of America that expired September 30, 2000. This contract cost was not included in the FY00101 operating budgets for the Parking System or Stormwater Utility. • The Stormwater Utility and Parking System Operating funds shared the cost of the Sweeping Corp. of America contract by paying the monthly installments for five and seven months respectively. With Stormwater Utility performing this task the Parking System will pay its share through a monthly fixed interfund charge. It is imperative that the timing of the purchase of the mechanical street sweeper and the establishment of a Heavy Equipment Operator position are coordinated to insure maximum cost effectiveness. Annual cost savin s of .Y9 7 are anticipated in addition to increased service, quality, and improved response time. • The budgeted costs for this service (including personnel, debt service, fleet maintenance charges, training, etc.) total $89,983. All costs were budgeted in the FY 2001 Stormwater budget with the exception of the Personnel costs of $29,180. The Parking System's share of this cost is 58% which is consistent with their share on the Sweeping Corp. of America contract. The 58% equates to $52,190. • Funding will be provided by an interdepartmental transfer from the Parking System operations (435-01333) in the amount of $52,190 on a monthly prorated basis which represents the Parking System's allocable portion of the cost to provide this service. First quarter budget amendments will establish the monthly fixed charge interfund transfer from the Parking System to the Stormwater Utility and increase the Stormwater Utility (419- 02090) operating budget for the additional payroll cost. Reviewed by: Legal NIA Budget W Purchasing?, NIA Info Srvc Public Works r'? (n DCMIACM ?? Risk Mgmt T NIA Other Submitted by: City Manager Originating Dept: M PW AdmW(G. Johnsol User Dept. 1 Public Services JL JJ/A Attachments 19 None Costs Total 129.800 Funding Source: r Current FY $29,800 Cl OP Other Appropriation Code: Printed on recYTed paper' Rev. 2198 Clearwater City Commission Worksession Item ft: ! 1 _ Agenda Cover Final Agenda Item ft ; M --+? Memorandum Meeting Date: 0.5 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: i Approve the Clearwater Airpark Master Plan. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: l At the direction of the City Commission, a Joint Participation Agreement was entered into between the Florida Department of Transportation and city in which each would provide 50% funding for the development of a Master Plan for the Clearwater Airpark. This plan is an update of the 1989 Greiner Master Plan and describes the current operation and develops the airfield over the first twelve years of the 20=year planning period. It guides the transition from a general fund operation to an enterprise fund operation in FY 2001 taking revenues from $100,000 annually in 1989 to a estimated $1.9M in year 2005, the end of the short term development. If the proposed midterm (2005-2010) and long term (2010 •- 2020) development is carried out, estimated revenues could increase to approximately $5M by 2012. The focus and priorities through each phase of the plan are: Safety.and Regulatory Compliance • Compatibility with Neighboring Residential Development • Economic Development for Financial Self-sufficiency The local neighborhoods have been involved with the planing process and have also been represented at the monthly Airport Authority board meetings. 1 Reviewed by: Legal ' Info Srvc NIA Budget Public Works NIA Purchasing A DCtvVACM Risk Mgmt NIA other Submitted by: City Manager UriM-a-rm, Wil Morris - , User Dept.: ? Marijz Attachments ? Norte Costs Total Funding Source: Current FY Cl OP Other riation Code: Printed on recPL (r. vft[il?•S .,1. ?, 3`c''IY; '?. M:f?„r .'"y: ? r I ? ? ; ? ivt `j',. S? i?'.r _ .tai ,v51S. "S'4 ;. j•f ,? ? t ,; , •1 p,' 1 1 • i .i rmati'O on, A was provided with z? item____ (#32) See Otticial j _Ke'6O",,,orts/Stud.ies rI Clearwater City V1korksessbn Item #: Commission. Final Agenda Item # _33 Agenda Cover Meeting Late: #U• .ab Memorandum SUBJECT/ RECOMMENDATION: Approve amendment to Chapter 33, Section 33.067 of the Code of Ordinances adding paragraph (10) to designate a new slow down minimum wake zone at Island Estates and pass on first reading Ordinance 6597-00. p and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The Marine Department received a request to designate a new slow down minimum wake zone at Island Estates - Palm Island SE -- Harbor Island. By extending the wake zone in this area, it is felt by staff that vessels moored along the East Side of Palm Island SE and Harbor Island will be protected from wakes by passing vessels. The Marine Advisory Board has requested that this item be brought forward to the commission. Currently, the city has. a State of Florida wake zone permit number 90-026. The State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission advised the city that the extension of the wake zone would be approved. After the ordinance is passed, the state will send an amendment to the city permit. All other existing city wake zones remain unchanged. Reviewed by: Originating a t.: Costs Legal ` Info Srvc NIA Marine Total NI A Budget NIA Public V\brks NIA User Dept.: Funding Source: Purchasing NIA DCM/ACM NIA Marine Current FY Cl Risk Mgmt NIA Other _ Attachments OP 1. Ordinance 6597.00 other 2. Wake zone chart q7, ?? Submitted by. jA 0 I ? None city Manager 04'to? Appropriation Code: Printed on recvcled pacer d? ORDINANCE NO'. 6697-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,-. RELATING TO WATERWAYS AND VESSELS; AMENDING SECTION 33.067, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO CREATE A NEW SUBSECTION (10), TO ADD A NEW DEFINED AREA FOR SPEED RESTRICTIONS OF VESSELS AT ISLAND ESTATES-PALM ISLAND SE-HARBOR ISLAND; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 33.067, Code of Ordinances, is amended by creating a new subsection (10) to read: Sec. 33.067. Same---Areas defined. (10) Slow down-minimum wake zone; Island Estates-Palm Island SE Harbor Island. All waters in the following described area are designated as a slow down -- minimum wake zone: Begin at a point approximately on Palm Island SE located at 27 degrees 59 minutes 05 seconds north, 82 degrees 48 minutes 48 seconds west, then in an easterly direction 75 yards, more or less, to a point marked by a buoy, then in a northerly direction 1,600 yards, more or less, to a point marked by a buoy, then in a southerly direction 75 yards, more or less, to a point approximately on Island Way, located at 27 degrees 59 minutes 51 seconds north, 82 degrees 49 minutes 16 seconds west, then in a easterly direction to Harbor Island and southerly direction along the shoreline to the point of beginning. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: JOe C. Hayman (J Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Cleric t t S I t Fi ;I Ordinance No. 6597-00 proposed AMtien To The NO" 1levworn teak. IWO He preen Mee apwale a boat V Mar a beat 10 be elevated h ar -aIV ree 61 the City aeetgnaled and peeled H ! /a- epees - rlNntrryrn -a?i ew at Q a speed 9re91w Itw1 Mot wood esllch It eoosonable ow praawit R w are e-hfky Ckcwhsfww" to a.ok an feceeshe -cbe. A beef ~ be depned to M Wwotoo In canaance -M Ihla aebeectlwr It the 6"1 1e eperataa tonpleletr off a Alone " ee111N We the win, a/ar praaocby no eeke w a r-1-6M -"a A beef .hall be deemed to be *wiled In Well, al this subseellan If the baal Is apwalad as a plena No pwson " opwals a boat ar wlee a boot Ile be .Wiled h anyy "IV ore at the Cllr deflpnated end pmted H in -We .peed - rq eaki lane at • Knaa gnetr Man the 11a-ret speed ".tenor to ewckrlpkl 11ewaq-.er. . C { 0011 moQCTa ?=I I :es s DAYBEACON - A-1 2A" "AID TO NAVIGATION" 4 WAKE ZONE BUOYS Peapased Addition To The (misting Minimum Woke Zone No person shall operate o boot or allow o boat to be operated in any wcler ore. of the city designated and posted as o 'slo¦ speed - minimum wake Zone at a speed greater thon that speed which is reosonoble and prudent under the oriel" circumstances to avoid on esusslre woke. A boat shall be deemed to be operated in compliance with this subsection if the boat Is operated completely all o pions and settled into the water while producing no wore or a minimum ¦oke. A boat shall be deemed to be operaled In violollon of this subsection it the boot Is operated on o pions. w' z.. ¦ ?,/?f lr No person shall operate a boat a allow a boot to be operated in an NOW area of the City designoted and posted as an idle speed - no woke' Zone of o spited greater than the slowest speed necessary to moinloin steerageway .A „sa? " Pgbe Q f ,. i tyr+yZ'?ji?ri,c .+? ,? yea IR ?e IV y ?Y aA ?,VJ. ?' , N } ? 4 T???j ••• ? .4 r .,t jai ?'?YS lr???: eY`µ.?• 40 W'A , .rrs •, 'y wYrr?Yi??? ?jT ?r!?r ?+fe't+?i k. fV e: ?, t f' , .tea Ilk% lam" °-" Page Y of 2 e 47 jy, VIM; .41 t t 3 • ., .? ???'''???y?rrr?r? ???1f?.vF•• ?'r ?j Hfi4f±k?'jJJJ? ?`'' , r+ iii } fff?+,,, ., fr a'?+?A'aa ?. rra r W A IF p file://CAWINDOWSIT[.:Mj,\Min wttke. j b 8/1.7/00 f S Bs ? Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Final Agenda Item ti Meeting Date: D . 5, 6 SUBJECTIRECOMMENDATION: Approve a Joint Project Agreement with the State of Florida's Department of Transportation to install and relocate natural gas mains during improvement project, FPID: 256338-1-52- 011WPI No. 71159761SPN: 14570-3519/Pasco County, SR 54/US 19 to Madison Street, at an estimated cost of $278,156.25, and adopt Resolution 00-37, W; and that the a ro riate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • State of Florida's Department of Transportation has a project to widen/improve SR 54 from .US 19 to Madison Street including roadway, sidewalk, other improvements, and utilities to include those existing Clearwater Gas System facilities which conflict with the design. ®i • Under the Joint Project Agreement UPA), the State of Florida's Department of Transportation general contractor will perform the relocation of existing and installation of new natural gas mains. • Having the State of Florida's Department of Transportation general contractor install the natural gas mains allows for work to be done in a timely manor and releases Clearwater Gas System from penalty payments. • Funding in the amount of $278,156.25 will be provided by a FY 00/01 first quarter amendment transferring this amount from Capital Projects 353-96311, Pinellas Improvements, in the amount of $34,435.00, project 353-96313, Pinellas Land, Building & Equipment in the amount of $100,000.00, project 353-96315 in the amount of $143,721.25, to projects 353-96314, Pasco County Gas Main & Service Lines in the amount of $143,721.25, project 353-96316, Pasco County Relocation in the amount of $134,435.00. The transferring of these funds will not have any adverse affect on any of the approved projects. Reviewed by: ? Legal Info Srvc NIA Originating Dept.: Clearwater Gas System Costs Total $278,156.25 Estimated Budget Public Works NIA User Dept.: Funding Source: Purchasing NIA DCM/ACM Clearwater Gas System Current FY 00101 CI X Risk Mgmt NIA. Other NIA Attachments: $278,156.25 OP Location Map Estimated Other Originator: Torn Robertson ltes. 00-37 (727)46 3 x240 )?Xi1 A to lies . Submitted by: ( rival labl a for rev Appropriation Code: 353-96316 City Manager -, T fn Clerk 1) nt Appropriation Corse: 353-96314 Printed on recycled paper r ? .r g ? tl Z CIJ Z„ 1`1 h t c1I wl r cn v cn $A n ND "ILV1 9 `v A LAM " ww 1 Ell K a 2 Man U7 ' tra In ?? r ?"•7t ~ - " wt r y w uu fr I * r ER 7 c?Qco 0 utirrfr -41 your '°' utL .uct !r ti ?{ Y+ w_[uM f1i ? ??; N\ n ? 1 ? 1 ? 1 rM sa ??9 ?. x ?R..7 • A VD IKEES. ?• ? a -ts ur -? ; A 1 F RD 55RM?.- 1- - • a E?? F n". ? na s ! rn a a [„^ ?rtiC ? n tl •? i s s Cd p C F1 T a T/ R ` + r' awn "T r x l yt, .. a7 is Z i ir x-t MN tt !C .a7 ? ? aa ° i it 'AA i' r 'k ROWAN' ?? ? ? ? p?h t•arrr ? E ct ha z $ t I c IC f; a] Iq [YIW T V r? w w . W O.?N rFyye I ° 1 N H C + y ?r t to 11 k 1 f r ' RESOLUTION NO. 00-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A UTILITY JOINT PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING INSTALLATION AND RELOCATION OF NATURAL GAS MAINS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR STATE ROAD 54 FROM U.S. 19 TO MADISON STREET; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has a project to widen and improve State Road 54 from U.. S. 19 to Madison Street including roadway, sidewalk, other improvements and utilities to include those existing Clearwater Gas System facilities which conflict with the design; and WHEREAS, under the Joint Project Agreement, the FDOT's general contractor will perform the relocation of existing and installation of new natural gas mains; and WHEREAS, having FDOT's general contractor install the natural gas mains allows for work to be done in a timely manner and releases Clearwater Gas System from penalty payments; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission hereby accepts and approves the Joint Project Agreement between the City and the State of Florida Department of Transportation, identified as Utility Work By Highway Contractor Agreement, Financial Project ID 256335-1-51-01, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. Section 2. The City Commission hereby authorizes the Mayor-Commissioner and City Manager to sign the Joint Participation Agreement described in this resolution and associated documents. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of October, 2000. Approved as to form: ,/one C. Hayman U Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Resolution No. 00-37 r 1r P op 2-- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item # Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date Oct. 5, 2000 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Amendments to Appendix A - Schedule of Fees, Rates and Charges of the Code of Ordinances to revise fees for land development applications. MOTION: APPROVE amendments to the fee schedule for land development applications and PASS Ordinance No. 6548-00 on first reading. ? and that the appropriate otficirds be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: + The Planning Department proposes to restructure the existing schedule of fees for development review applications to reflect the procedures of the new Community Development Code. When the new Code was adopted in March 1999, the existing fee schedule remained in effect with no changes to the fees. Y In order to determine the cost of processing development review applications, staff conducted a time study identifying each staff person involved in the review and the amount of time spent on each type of case. + Based on' the findings of the time study, staff' costs were calculated based on the number of hours spent on case review and multiplied by the individual's hourly rate. Public notice and legal advertising costs were also included. Indirect costs such as phones, fax, copies, etc. were not added to the review cost. + In addition to the time study, staff reviewed development review fees charged by other area communities for comparison purposes. • Tile findings of the fee study and research indicate that the majority of existing fees do not adequately reflect the amount of staff time required to review development applications. Therefore, the Planning Department recommends new fees to reflect the cost of the review. This recapture of the staff review cost is consistent with the fees charged for other similar fees where the applicant is the prime beneficiary of the project. Examples of fees similar to development review fees are building permit fees, impact fees and utility fees. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs Legal Info Svc NIA Planning & Develop. dmi . Gina L Clayton Total NIA Budget NIA Public Works NIA User Dept.: Funding Source: Purchasing NIA DCMIACM NIA Planning Current FY Cl Fisk Mgmt NIA Other NIA Attachments OP Staff Report Othe Ord. No. 8548.00 r jSu b mM tted by: ( y anager 91S ©NOne Appropriation Code: 3 Print"" ^" ra?wlad ma ?•`•ryd??.\?'r,.v'o??,?'xoy.6?-F}^?ti,''.ir'.?r',; W,`..->:: ...,....y ,. .._.of....:,. . ? .,.d.. ..t.. .ai"'7 ;1?` ...., r - ' <. .,...• .r .u». r The Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed the proposed amendments at its May 16, 2000 meeting and expressed concern about the high application costs for single family homeowners, and recommended a reduction. in fees, Staff is therefore recommending no change in fees for single family property owners for ! flexible standard development applications and a reduction from the current fee for single family property owners for. flexible development applications. . The Board also recommended that the cost of appeals to the State Hearing Officer be paid by the losing party instead of by the applicant. • After the CDB meeting, the City Attorney's office reviewed the Board's recommendation with regard to the cost of appeals to the State Hearing Officer. Due to the fact that a non-prevailing party will have no incentive { to pay the hearing officer's actual costs, there is concern that the City will need to pursue collection and/or litigation to recover those costs. Based on this concern, staff is recommending that the ordinance be amended j to require a flat fee of $500 for appeals submitted to a Hearing Officer, This recommendation, as well as a reduction in fees for flexible standard and flexible development applications for single'-familY /two-famil Y development has been included in the proposed ordinance. i 2 ' CDB Meeting Date: Mar 16 2000 Case: Ordinance No. 6548-00 Agenda Item: Director's Item . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX A OF CODE OF ORDINANCES REQUEST: Amend the Schedule of Application Fees, Rates and Charges for Level One, Level Two, and Level Three Applications INITIATED BY: City of Clearwater Planning Department Staff BACKGROUND INFORMATION: When the new Community Development Code was adopted, flexible standard development and flexible development replaced several development applications including certified site plans, variances and conditional uses. Since it was uncertain how staff intensive the review of these new types of development applications would be, no adjustments were made to the application review fees. Fees charged over the last year have been based on the most similar application in the existing schedule of fees. As part of the six month code update, staff initiated a fee study. The purposes of the study were to determine fees for the new development applications; evaluate the existing fee schedule to determine if it adequately represents development review costs; and to determine how the schedule relates to fees charged by area communities. ANALYSIS: Methodolon In order to determine the cost of processing development review applications, staff involved in all aspects of development review participated in a time study. Staff from the Planning, Fire, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, Solid Waste, and Legal departments participated in the study. During October and November 1999, each staff member recorded the amount of time spent reviewing applications for annexations, land use plan map amendments, rezonings, flexible standard development and flexible development applications. Each staff person kept a log of time spent and work done on each case. The amount of staff review time for each case from application until final decision was recorded. The specific tasks included are: time spent on case analysis, report 'preparation, meetings/phone conversations with the applicant and the public, agenda preparation, Development Review Committee (DRQ and Community 1 Development Board (CDB) meeting attendance and, file management and agenda tracking. After the time study was completed, the number of staff hours was totaled for each case logged.. Based on the data, an average number of hours was determined for each staff member by type of development, application. This average was further refined by determining caseload, job responsibility, and work hours for the staff involved. Staff costs were calculated based on the number of hours spent on case review and the staff's hourly rate including direct benefits (medical plus life insurance, city contributions to pension or 401 A.) The number of cases reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) and the Community Development Board (CDB) was totaled for the time period of April 1999 to April 2000. During this thirteen month period, the DRC reviewed a total of 152 development applications and the CDB reviewed sixty-seven applications. Below please find a breakdown of applications by type and number. TOTAL NUMBER OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS April 1999 w April 2000 Type Of Cane Development Review Community Development Committee Board Flexible Standard Development 88 0 Flexible Development 31 31 Annexations 21 24 Land Use Plan Amendments 11 10 Re zonings 1 2 2 AVERAGE NUMBER OF CASES PER MONTH April 1999 - April 2000 Type of Case Development Review Community Development Committee Board Flexible Standard 6.77 0 Flexible Development 2.38 2.38 Annexations 1.62 1.85 Land Use Plan Amendments 0.85 0.77 Rezonings 0.08 0.15 In addition to staff development review time, public notice costs were also included in determining the total cost for processing each development application. The average cost of notifying adjacent property owners by first class mail for flexible standard development applications and for notifying those within 500 feet of the property for all other cases was based on the number of notices sent for each case. This information was obtained from the files of the Planning and City Clerk departments. In addition to public notices mailed to surrounding properties, the Community Development Code requires legal advertisements to be placed in the newspaper for flexible development, annexations, land use plan amendments and rezonings. An average cost per case was determined based on the number and cost of the legal advertisements that have been placed for these cases over the past year. The other cost associated with public notice is the City Clerk's staff time required to prepare and process the required notification of surrounding property owners and the placement of legal advertisements in the newspaper. On average, staff time cost to prepare the advertisement was included for each case. Typical Costs for Development Below please find the total cost for a typical flexible standard development, flexible development, annexation, land use plan amendment, and rezoning application. Each chart represents the cost for a particular development application and details the amount of time spent by each staff member involved in processing the development application. Also included are all public notice costs. 3 TYPICAL FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Single Familyfrwo-Family Development) Staff Review Only Staff Staff Review Hours Planner . 6.00 Land Resource Specialist 1,50 Staff. Assistant H 1.50 Development Review Manager 6.00 Assistant Phmnin Director 1.00 Planning Director 1.00 REVIEW STAFF TOTAL HOURS 17.00 PUBLIC NOTICE MAILING COSTS $2.40 TOTAL COST $395.53 i 4 TYPICAL FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Multi-Family/Commercial Development) Staff Review Only Staff Staff Review Hours Planner 6.00 Land Resource S ecialist 1.50 Staff Assistant N 1.50 Engineer I (stormwater, easements, parking lots design, and utilities) 1.50 Traffic Operations Engineer 1.00 Assistant Director of Solid Waste 0.25 Administrative Analyst (parks and open space impact fees) 0.25 Fire Prevention Ins ector 0.25 Development Review Manager 6.00 Assistant Plannin Director 1.00 Plannin Director 1.00 REVIEW STAFF TOTAL HOURS 20.25 PUBLIC NOTICE MAILE14G COSTS $2.10 TOTAL COST $475.71 c 1 I 5 i TYPICAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Single Family/Two Family Development) ..Community Development Board Review Staff' Staff Review Hours CAD Technician Trainee 3.00 Planner 10.00 Land Resource Specialist 1.50 Staff Assistant II 3.00 Assistant City Attorney II 0.50 Development Review Manager 19.00 Assistant Planning Director 2.00 Planning Director 2.00 REVIEW STAFF TOTAL HOURS 41.00 PUBLIC NOTICE MAILING COSTS $30.0 LEGAL NOTICE COSTS $18.00 CITY CLERK STAFF HOURS 2.00 TOTAL COST $1,083.15 6 t? TYPICAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Multi-Family/Commercial Development) Community Development Board Review Staff Staff Review Hours CAD Technician Trainee 3.00 Planner 10,00 Land Resource Specialist 1.50 Staff Assistant 11 3.00 Fire Prevention Inspector 0.25 Engineer I (stormwater, parking lot design, casements and utilities) 1.50 Traffic Operations Engineer 2.00 Assistant Director of Solid Waste 0.75 Administrative Analyst (parks and open space im act fees) 0,25 Assistant City Attomey 11 .50 Development_ Review Mana er 19.00 Assistant Planning Director 2.00 Planning Director 2.00 REVIEW STAFF TOTAL HOURS 45.75 PUBLIC NOTICE MAILING COSTS $30.00 LEGAL NOTICE COSTS $15.00 CITY CLERK STAFF HOURS 2.00 TOTAL COST $1,204.44 7 TYPICAL ANNEXATION APPLICATION Community Development Board and City Commission Review Staff Staff Review Hours CAD Technician Trainee 3.00 Senior Planner 5.00 Staff Assistant U 3.00 Fire Prevention ins ctor 0.25 Engineer I (stormwater, parking lot design, easements and utilities) 0.20 Traffic 4 erations Engineer 0.20 Administrative Analyst (parks and open space imp act fees) 0.25 Legal Staff Assistant 1.00 Assistant City Attorney II 1.50 Assistant Planning Director 1.50 Planning Director 1.00 REVIEW STAFF TOTAL HOURS 16.90 PUBLIC NOTICE MAILING COSTS $30.00 LEGAL NOTICE COSTS $158.00 CITY CLERK STAFF 14OURS 2.00 TOTAL COST $ 584.40 8 R 1 I, , TYPICAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Community Development Board and City Coritmission, PPC and CPA Review Staff Staff Review Hours CAD Technician Trainee 3.00 Senior Planner 10.00 Staff Assistant It 3.00 Legal Staff Assistant 1.00 Assistant City Attorney II 1.50 Assistant Planning Director 5,00 Plannin Director 2.00 REVIEW STAFF TOTAL HOURS 25,50 PUBLIC NOTICE MAILING COSTS $30.00 LEGAL NOTICE COSTS $158.00 CITY CLERK STAFF HOURS 2.00 TOTAL COST $ 881.39 9 TYPICAL REZONING APPLICATION Community Development Board and City Commission Review Stan' Staff' Review Hours CAD Technician Trainee 3.00 Senior Planner 10.00 Staff Assistant II 3.00 Legal Staff Assistant 1.00 Assistant City Attorney II 1.50 Assistant Planning Director 2.00 'Planning Director 2.00 REVIEW STAFF TOTAL HOURS 22.50 PUBLIC NOTICE MAILING COSTS $30.00 LEGAL NOTICE COSTS $158.00 CITY CLERK STAFF HOURS 2.00 TOTAL COST $ 773.(9 Indirect costs such as copying, phones, faxes, computers and maintenance were not calculated in the study. Staff also compiled a list of development fees charged by communities including Pinellas County, Largo, Pinellas Park, St. Petersburg, Tampa, and Hillsborough County. Even though no other community has a flexible standard or flexible development application, it is useful to review site plan review, variance, and conditional use/special exception fees for comparison purposes. It should be noted that Sarasota was contacted but was not included in the comparison because all development applications are charged on a time and material basis. Attached please rind the table detailing development review fees charged by other area communities. 10 Based on the fee study and the survey of fees charged by other, communities, staff is recommending that the application fees for. flexible standard development, flexible development, rezonings, land use plan amendments and rezonings be based on the actual cost of staff time. and public notice costs. Below please find the recommended development application fees. . EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD, FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT, ANNEXATIONS, LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS, AND REZONINGS Tyne of Development Existing Fee Actual Cost of Proposed Approval Processing Fee 1 A lication Flexible Standard - Single $50-$100 $395.53 $50-$100 Famii fl'wo Family Dev. Flexible Standard - Multi- $300 $475.71 $475.00 Famil /Commercial Dev. Flexible Development - $450 $1,083.15 $200.00 Sin letrwo Family Dev. Flexible Development - Multi- $450 $1,204.44 $1,205.00 Family/Commercial Dev. Annexation No Fee $584.40 No Fee (2) Land Use Plan Amendment $785 $881.39 $885.00 Rezoning Only $250 $ 773.64 $775.00 (1) Rounded up in increments ol-$5.00 (2) No fee recommended due to economic development goals. In addition to the development cases listed above are others types of applications that require staff review. Although a specific time study was not prepared for these cases, the recommended fee is based on the above similar fees plus the department's evaluation of the estimated time spent on each case type. Each of the following applications were evaluated based on the complexity of the application, the existing fee, and the fee charged by other communities for the same or similar application. Below please find the recommended fee for those applications. 11 OTHER EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES FOR ALL OTHER DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Type of Development Existing Fee Proposed Fee A roval Comprehensive Sign $300.00 $475.00 Program' Transfer of Development Rights $150.00- $350.00 $ I205.00 No add'] charge if submitted with flexible a lication Minor Lot Adjustments $150.00 $150.00 Not specified in appendix --- Verification letter - $25.00 Zoning Letters charge $10.00 Into retation letter - $50.00 Appeals to CDB $100.00 Residential - $100.00 Nonresidential - $250.00 Appeals to Hearin Officer $365.00 State Hearin Officer Costs Preliminary Plat $890.00 $600.00 Final Plat Included in Preliminary Plat $300.00 Fee $50 (for any continuances Continuances requiring re-advertising) $75.00 Development Agreement $365.00 $500.00 Text Amendment No Fee $885.00 Historic Designation No Fee No Fee Neighborhood Conservation No Fee No Fee Overlay District Concurrenc Review $50.00 No Fee Vested Rights $200.00 $500.00 Determination 12 YSY .y }.R Yj ' „ SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The proposed amendment to Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances proposes to restructure this existing schedule of fees by eliminating the existing fees and replacing, them with fees for Level One, Level Two, and Level Three development applications. Based on the findings of the fee study, the majority of existing fees do not adequately reflect the amount of staff time required to review development applications. Staff is recommending APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 6548-00 creating a new development review fee structure reflecting the proposed fees in the far right column of each table.. Prepared by: Gina L. Clayton ATTACHMENTS: Comparison of Fees Charged by Other Communities Proposed Ordinance No. 6548-00 L r ?. r r . U g ,.., {/] n gyro ' I ? 4J M CI4 in -r N} S g Sr ?fT (n ren vT kn C r- V7 C7 in O ` p z c x H r z S M4 ¢ tn 6q r z V CD C) LA C) V) In 0 tn , 0 a V) f? u ° 1^ S o S ° o o CA ° w z w z ° o a z U x F 3 ?. v g o z c g t r_ to tn ? u) S a? w o z o r'-' ?I tn yi tn ui fn © rfi ?• (00 z C a: 0 O W W L?+ v a $ ? g 1x113 ? ,? 0 Z + g 11 U-1 S 1?0 in ? Q V) r a ? z n , o ? z a a CD S f) C ctn a V) ? r ..1? CD CD rt coq CD CD cv G z o C) CD 3 CD CD ? ra o > C) 3 a?i E-M u V I o Cy a = a] d ? c3 ? °' ? o 'O U ? in cn ? s?, a 1 Q ? c [?. ? C Gs. y N cf) ? a ,? O „ v Q t ORDINANCE NO. 6548-00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX A, SCHEDULE OF FEES, RATES AND CHARGES,, RELATING TO APPLICATION FEES FOR LEVEL ONE, LEVEL TWO, AND LEVEL THREE DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater adopted a new Community Development Code establishing three different levels of approvals ; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to implement a fee schedule which accurately reflects the types of approval required by the new Community Development Code; and WIIEREAS, the implementation of the Community Development Code through research and plans review involves the commitment of City staff; and WHEREAS, the administration of the Community Development Code serves a substantial public purpose and thereby the public health, safety, welfare, and economic well being; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and appropriate that certain charges be imposed for the services performed by City staff in connection with the implementation of the Community Development Code; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Appendix A, Schedule of Fees, Rates and Charges, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE OF FEES, RATES AND CHARGES VIII. LAND DEVELOPMENT: There is hereby established the following fees and charges relating to review and processing of &ite-p land use plans and zoning atlas amendment and subdivisions plats, ea k4enal uses, varianees, appeals, eentinuanees and ?cl=eu iLrciar insrc•'_ and rune elopmeG'TI*t agg'TCeme views b Level One, Level Two and Level Three applications: (1) Site Plan 1VH*eW-.-' (a) Bas ar-ge reach site I Ordinance No. 6548-00 i kraetien theF#.e . . . . 50.09 (k) ----Revalidatien of a eeFtified site plan --159:9 (e)L-- Site plan afneadment (af4eF eei4ifieatiefi) 150.00 „?enr «_r:_nhts; l?rlr?r?-.r. i. With feffnal site plan r-e-view. . . 1=50.W 2__ -_'1 itheut g"fm"'l site plan390.99- r . t 1•?a 17TTpTCiTT4 We4w . (a) Base haEge_f r. each _pmlim:r.nrysi,rli?tinie n plat ?0 ' ?- Base b Plus-.. ....-' or- each let inel 'ded a the'plan .... 25.90 (bl_. De1 alidat nr' r'l?n_nnrf:f ed pr-eli ?i"ni'ur a `. "lpa} } }e}} 1TiL"'n`t 50- (e) SUbdiViSieR Pic-It. t (o{eT-CeftWle°"r''}"q ['?- to rn }1 g) ',-' ?lM:'lytl ?+1 (`l) A ` rMni°tfa #ie l8tii i s48n .... i 50:-0 (3) Annemfien and inkial V . .. initial $sitt""tien-(:nnl„ diffg ? Y' " eyed-siR-le- b b b t' b . familie_dwelling un t) . . . No nl,nrrYn 1?' b v~ b l3eon fer- _ai endmeat of the Fening atlcsaas . . 250.90 b)----t?ticn r•'ln?rer_a Zoning amanrlm b b 2 Ordinance No. 6548-00 f /n1 _-_SLnrinnnnr• O b . 2 ier stn ri nsanns fray re&ide . . . • . Single .... _ 8 171rr'aa ?Z i_ A-ni additiennl request ffaf eenditien Luse with Tespeet to the came pr-epeAf-er- eenti6HElus pr-ApaFties by the same owner, -::-50.0g A 0.00 hip ivr- whi IE-wept ,,„ ?eq estr inyelyinnb tan b n l-any ?etail- Si'rl`''s uses ssl=1'7?'I'T•. .'li.GU?t"lir beverages as an '.` er-y ",u??. ara b sY# ttrhieh dither. (a) can of area; of :-(b) sell nle-? elir. besrernbes-enly as paFt et n. "g,44 set" in Whithe value ef Fage(s) in the set is n 50 _peFeent_o[ the been _estrablisherl-lasr_an 0!' ininl u4y-the-eity eemmissian . . . . AIen (6) f•L1.. Anneal frram rplnnni.?n •nil ..r.I+j aFd-eF-& heuing officer.,'. . . 365,00 (b) pp;rzil=-iium flexi e-&a 3 Lien 'E1 39 -i3Fc3E }HI tS E'1t!}} {?f 3Ct' EiE3f} nv . e Rity development aeafEl-.... 1 "0 .1 . E i 3 Ordinance No. 6548-00 ¦: (2) Per- Yested a w t ; - i 365 00 ' l agrvepnerr e .... i ev . ipmen e (1) Level One. ia) Minimum standard development applications No Fee (b) Zoning Verification Letter $25.00 (c) Zoning interpretation Letter $50.00 d Minor lot adjustment $150.00 (e) Flexible Standard Development - Single Family and Two Family Properties - Acces_ sor_y Uses/Structures $50.00 (ff) Flexible Standard Development -- Single Family and Two Family Properties $100.00 Flexible Standard Development - Multi-fa and Commercial Properties $475.00 (h) Continuances of a DRC meeting $75.00 2 Level Two. (a) Flexible Development •- Single Family and Two Family Properties $200.00- (b) Flexible Development - Multi-Fami! and Commercial' Property $1205.00 4 Ordinance No. 6548-00 ,$?,; f.1v=•v,+'h:?C?.Sf ?f'i '? '::1)y ,..:S''e'e?.'., ti..... ... .,: . I , i i (c) ' Appeals to the Community _Development Board - Residential 100A0 WY Appeals to the Community Development Board - Nonresidential $250.00 Le) Appeals to Hearing Officer $500.00 e Continuances of DRC or CDB meetin o<ublic hearing . $75.00 (g) Transfer of Development _Rights $1205.00 (No additional charge i_f_submitted with flexible application (h) Preliminary Plat $600.00 I ' I , i } (3)L vel' Three. (a) Annexations Cincluding land use map amendmenoand rezoning to categories compatible with the County designation's No Fee b Land Use Ma Amendment S$ 85.00 c Rezonin g only ? $775.00 . (d) Continuances of a DRC. CDB, or 75.00 City Commission meeting/public hearing {e) Development Agreement $500.00 Final Plat $300.00 (c) Vested _Rihhts $500.00 - Section 2. 1`lotice of the proposed enactment of this Ordinance has been properly advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with applicable law. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect, immediately upon adoption. 5 Ordinance No. 6548-00 1 ! ' ' ' I ' .''t . IyE` • .I r ' ? 1 f 1 . r? ? fi , • ,, , ' • ., , r ' ' .. 1 ?t F • a ' .. ? ., 'f'. .."' ??1, X 1' `! - "?+? .? ., af ' ? . t 1 r ' ? _ ? ? ? , } 1.1'.4 f a (.'r, .l,??d??vr47^P .?'•:i ??i ..?A'if?i?fti?•=?i'.'i}Kylr•!r.•-•o/94?1?' ? e_.,?5-.. .- a ..• ±r lra:`! YI:?M1 v.' ,?,.r ..,. .. ,. ., a -, ?1 a ... .,...r .• .>.t. ... ... . PASSED ON FIRST READING i PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL ' READING AND ADOPTED ' E Brian J. Aungst '.`. Mayor-Commissioner' -Approved as to. form., Attest: Leslie Dougall-Sid Cynthia E'. Goudeau City Clerk i g Ordinance No.. 6548-00 in 00 n u w U .2 0 * o o Ct °v ° 0 0 o z u C4 in %0 ws (n , d ckl °o u ¢ (?3 z 0 ?y ? w S o ? CD 2 kn ?' N a CV w r N Cs+ oo ^; ON (n 00 ,--. 00 (r) V3 I v A G. 6A 6A cLn to p r O N (f , N «. V'1 fA v 00 z C CD C7 G?+ N CD Ls. C) O .-. CD . w kn N W CD C> cn O En U11 U9 b9 b4 z C? O' 3 I ? CD wi Q C . V) oq (09 PC a Ln V) H z J. U r v CD CD i - -I - - C? - - -- - CD r C) n Ln Ln CD tn tn c (? (? foq ( z r-j t q z z d a ° `r' b4 0 z - - -- --. ._ •- .- -- c ? w kr. ? F 4 z (g ( V' N En f?f, uA z ° o r o L-S d y a h O C] a CD O (of) (A Ccr f) ( V) V ni 0 z N (0) V) 0 z d h v , Q t o n w w Cos ? a N 69 d c ° .1 CD C Co a - - ... V) U '7 I O O a O O O (9 ? z V) p ? r 4 z w 1 z Q 0 , O C7 c? N z o z ?- 0 y 61 ? y O a+ u C? tw v C di F r. ri a O v r cti U o F C ra 2 0 35 •'S. `r?tA>. s'ttyi'[r.i .?.. [ ? ?. 1L [, I [ [ F .r. fo o)dT a+j<?•`?+f -. `i14. ¢?-e'• 'rlr •A? ,•`;' 1!•,[ a?:Ir. ?+1'.J .t ". g,? ?', ? , :,?•<"` ,S UI ? ,Y'^? #•, •? ;+s:"S ??'"; :i ?-}'.? I?s'y ?'. Ala''.. .'s+S:: ?' :;?•' ..?1'7. .r .? ?: ' e.:: " : er' 1. d f+` , ?, [ 7??y.".c?''• ? k #,, ? ? . 1 .r{" ,p?4"•;r i?'?' '? - ?] a 1 . ? . ?..•t?[f,r .?ty[ `1°' "?'4..=. .}•' ,_?#? ? G??k-::j.?i r"kh ?+?{st`ra ,?;'`U ?j ui;??'?'. k???•si. ?: ;i%,?I. b., f.: j S??}..'.t': p.C?„ 13? +1 :.a".,k: " c 4j'. S .'F? !:]y';Y?"?•s "r 1.p {;c ;f(r•'{. i?;,v'.?' '•`•.?>' r .)?,,[.}r .. .i'"'dr :i:?.•d??t° °'I c: [.: ? ?_?;:,':i' :t••tr'. ;jav ',i ?: r•" -aayy :?rTy '?%': I.i 7'"d'$?. 15 ?}f •i?.?'" 4j? e1?".y ?C S?Y.._'4.1 7 .f i. ?' .l>-t It './ ?l',,r??' ?f, '.!. .S'.{..' ?.?."I?l'. ..? i'. Llfv ?:., ,'S fti-?: M:' i, r54. .l :4v+ 4 y' [), 't.. •%;'?• "`f•: 3y . ''yFs?: •ot i-.i? Nfr I?-('Z'" jl e.'r;,,i{ .'M: '?' .•c,. s'' t•', l-r ?? [ r?d_,i' ' '3'6 r 11- i uf + _ q3"1 01 g Q K, APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET FOR COMMISSION MEETING • October 5, 2000 APPOINTMENTS Acenda # 3? BOARD: Library Board MEMBERS: 7 TERM: 4 'years CHAIRPERSON: Judy Melges APPOINTED BY: City Commission MEETING DATES: 3rd Fri., 10:30 am FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Not Required PLACE: Library Conference Room RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT:City of Clearwater APP'TS. NEEDED: 1 SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: None DATE APPTS TO BE MADE: 1015100 THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE. Date of Original Attendance Interest in Name Appointment Record reappointment 1. Judy Melges 1996 past 10 mtgs YES present 9 current term expires 10131!00 THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE VACANCIES: Name-Address Comments-Related Experience,Etc. 1. Jan Regulski Retired 1045 Chinaberry Rd., 33764 2. Clorinda (Cookie) Gilreath past member Historic Preservation Board 1709 Sunset Dr., 33755 -3. Frederick Dunn Retired Management Consultant 1881 N. Hercules Ave.,#1302,33765 Zipcodes of current members on board: 2 at 33759 2 at 33761 1 at 33765 2 at 33767 (1 is Ms. Melges) CITY OF CLEARWATER - APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS (must be Clearwater resident) 11 G Home Address: Office Address: l'L.F? r l? zip zip Telephone: ,1.3- Telephone: ryys How long a resident of Clearwater? Occupation: W Employer: Field of Education: Other Work Experience: If retired, former occupati Community Activities: -' Board Service (current and past): Le2l s Ad`diiional Comments: Sign Date:, >2k r eel Pew See attached list for boards that require Financial Disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this application & board questionnaire for each board listed to: City Clerk's Department, P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 or drop off at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue R V f I 9/20/00 Verified continued interest Board Preference: h MAY 19 1998 Tly CLERK DS PT Other Interests: BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE 1. /What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities? 2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station? 3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on this Board? -lee -rte .....2... 4. Why do you want to serve on this Board? Name: Board Name: MA Y 19 1998 SRI DEa 7 CITY OF CLEARWATER - APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS (must be Clearwater resident) . Name: v I< 1 rJ :A [ Home Address: Office Address: ' ZiL.S f Zip Telephone: G 7 2 Telephone: How long a resident of Clearwater? _?,? _ Occupation: 9'. -6:s, Q.- 0- Field of Education: ?- Employer:..{- A -H-a 7 ri Other Work Experience: If retired, former occupation:_ Community Activit Additional Comments: Signed: Date: 'f I See attached list for boards that require Financial Disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this application & board questionnaire for each board listed to: City Clerk's Department, P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 or drop off at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue ? APR G 9 1999 `-i Ci w?"X inrr=P r Board Service (current and past): Board Preference: n l ? L;-) 1.414&2 24 M-J. 4. _ Lu • „ __:_ ?? 1 l1I1d?- aJ -`L (? 1--• 13 _ i. 1 C . e BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE 3. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities? 2. Have.you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, 'the City's TV station? 3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on this Board? L A. 4. Why do you want to serve on this Board? - C Rlame:?.?? Board Name: U? Apr, i3? 199.9 CITY OF CLEARWATER - APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS (must be'Clearwater resident) Name: :Ee 6?q ?g? 16 14 ?U /f//I) Home Address: C.. 9 A -22Z A Zip ' zl t 5 s Telephone: A a Office Address: Zip Telephone: Flow long a resident of Clearwater? oe7s 66?3 Occupation: ,2&ee:?z 0 Employer: Field of Education: Other Work Experience: a If retired, former occupation: r 4f:69W? zl G7,4A) T Community Activities: -rvgFe,4,4L 42 ZfaLE!57- 499 2e! Other Interests: ZEZ5 r Board Service (current and past): Board Preference: Additional Comments: Sig ; Date: See attached list for boards that require Financial Disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this application & board questionnaire for each board listed to: City Clerk's Department, P. 0. Box 474B, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 iMp TNII, 2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue Nov 19 1999 C'S-1 V CL&GK Dr-PT- BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE Applicant's Name: ELF /G U ?t1 Name of Board Applying For: 1, What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities? S D 2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station? 3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on this Board? 4. Why do you want to serve on this Board? 226E -1427de? XI) A,ie 1 ? ? 1 . r ?I 1 1 1 APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET FOR COMMISSION MEETING October 5 2000 APPOINTMENTS A d #`" , gen a BOARD: Municipal Code Enforcement Board MEMBERS: 7 TERM:' 3 years CHAIR: Helen Kerwin ' APPOINTED BY: City Commission MEETING DATES: 4th Wed., 3 pm FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required except Nov. & Dec. to be 2nd Wed. RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater APPTS. NEEDED: 3 SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: Whenever possible, DATE APPTS.' TO BE MADE: 1015100 this Board shall include an architect, engineer, businessperson, general contractor, sub-contractor & a reactor THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAV E TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE. Date of Original Attendance Interest in Name Appointment Record reappointment 1, David Allbritton 1997 past 10 mtgs YES ' ending complete 1 st term present 8 2. Joyce Martin 1998 past 10 mtgs YES completing a "term present 9 3. Pete Caffentzis 1999 YES completing a terra "4126 was 1 st meeting as member; absent 5/24 & 6/28 due to unforeseen scheduling conflict which is now resolved; board did not have a July mtg; present 8123 & 9/27 current terms for the above expire 10/31 /00 THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE VACANCIES: Name-Address Comments-Related Experience, Etc. 1. David Campbell Retired computer systems analyst 2310 Minneola Rd., 33764 past member C-view Task Force Zipcodes of current members: 1 at 33755 1 at 337561 1 at 33761 2 at 33764 (Ms. Martin & Mr. Caffentzis) 2 at 33767 (1 is Mr. Allbritton) 5 r . CITY OF CLEARWATER Application for Advisory Boards (must Be Clearwater resident) Name R E I V E D SEP 2 7 1996 CITY CLERK DEPT. Home Address: Office Address: 2310 Minnegla Road Clearwater. FZod4a ZIP: 34624 Me: Telephone 725-1276 Telephone How Long a resident of the City of Clearwater? singe 1990 Occupation Employer Field of Education: Other Work Experience; Computer Science If retired, former occupation rgmau Community Activities: homeowners association. Coalijion of Qlgarwpter }jQn]PoA02M Assog- lations Other Interests: Board Service (current and past) Board Preference; CERTAF. Q IEWAdvisory Task Force MCEB Additional Comments: Signed: Date: September 2Z. I29Q ._ Please see attached list for Boards that require Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 346118 v t" 5-I C Yl et 1 J-C. 1 37 ??? Cc3ri? 1nR?'?' ? I r1`?t'i'?:?? t~ .1 r P.02 J7 BOARD QUESTIONAIRE 1.. What Is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities? To onforc!2 the Cocig of Ordinance Qf 2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either In peerson or on C-view, the City's N station? yP,s ...,_..,..,,,._. 3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on this Board? Homg9wjj.gr associationmembership pad pgdjc1I2a1ioo prLd §gfYigg on the Cade Enforcement-Review-T--AskF-orce-{CERTAFI - -_ - --- - „_, 4. Why do you want to serve on this Board? To perform civic duty and to assist In upholding of city codes. Name:David W. Campbell Board Name: MCEB PRELIMINARY AGENDA Clearwater City Commission Worksession - 9:00 A.M. • October 2, 2000 PUR PURCHASING 1. Penny's School of Dance, gymnastics instruction, 1016100.10131101, est. $45,000 (PR) 2.. Rotonics Manufacturing, 90 gallon refuse containers & spare parts, 1016100-9131101, est. $75,000 (SW) 3. Voyager Fleet Systems, 1 st of 2 renewal options, vehicle fuel & related services, 1211100- 11130102, est. $800,000 (GS) 4. General Chemical Corporation, low iron aluminum sulfate, 1016100-10131101, est. $60,000 (PW) 5. Jimmie's Wrecker Service, towing service, 1111100-10131103, est. $100,000 (GS) 6. Declare vehicles & equipment surplus to city needs; authorize disposal through sale at Tampa Machinery Auction or by transfer to Solid Waste SBS STRATEGIC BUSINESS SERVICES 1. Agreement with FDOT to install natural gas mains for relocation & install new natural gas mains during SR541US19 to Madison Street improvement project, est. $278,156.25; Res. #00-37 - approving execution of the utility joint project agreement 2. Amendment to Agreement with Florida Gas Transmission, additional est. $54,000; contract to Citrus Energy Services, Inc., est. $49,500; contract to Motorfueler's Inc, of Clearwater, $161,542; construct gate station at Mitchell & Trinity Oaks Blvd. in Pasco County (est. total $265,042)(Consent) MR MARINE 1. Approve Clearwater Airpark Master Plan 2. First Reading Ord. #6597-00 - Relating to Waterways and Vessels; amending Sec. 33.067 to create a new subsection 110) to add a new defined area for speed restrictions of vessels at Island Estates - Palm Island SE - Harbor Island PD POLICE 1. Agreement with Pinellas County School System / Clearwater Adult Education Center, provision of educational services, est. $75,000 (Consent) PR PARKS AND RECREATION 1. Engineer of Record Contract to Wade-Trim for design, permitting & construction of N. Greenwood Recreation and Aquatics Center, $311,000 (Consent) 2. Approve locating N. Greenwood Recreation and Aquatics Center on Ray Green Ballfleld (SW corner of Palmetto & Greenwood) and the N. Greenwood Branch Library on Jack Russell Stadium Parking lot PW PUBLIC WORKS 1. Agreement with FDOT, providing funding of project costs up to $150,000 to fund study to evaluate proposed guideway (light rail or other technology) linking Clearwater Beach and downtown Clearwater; determine technical feasibility, economic contribution to revitalization 1012100 1 2. Work Order to Wade-Trim (Engineer of Record), conditional upon approval by FDOT; services related to study of proposed guideway, amount not to exceed $145,000 3. Contract to Oakhurst Construction Company, Inc., Restroom & Shower Facilities at Clearwater Municipal Marina (45 Causeway Blvd.), $101,310 (Consent) 4. Agreement with Pinellas County, provide funding for South Beech Reclaimed Water Project, costs of up to $39,676 (Consent) 5. Contract to Keystone Excavators, Inc., South Beach Reclaimed Water Distribution System, $1,412,695 6. One Year Lease with Pinellas County for use of City parking lot #15, 111 Pierce Blvd., located on west side of City Hall building (Consent) 7. Contract to Altec Industries, Inc., purchase of one 2001 Ford F450 utility truck with Altec AL32 aerial lift, $57,126; increase CIP budget from $38,000 to $57,126; authorize funding under City's Master Lease-Purchase Agreement (Consent) 8. Amendment to Agreement with SWFWMD, for Stevenson Creek Watershed Management Plan, to change effective date of Agreement to 316100 (Consent) 9. Ratify/Confirm 12/27/99 Agreement with Meristar Hospitality Operating Partnership, LP (Hilton Clearwater Beach Hotel); approve payment to Meristar in the amount $34,550.34 for replacement of property affected by construction of Clearwater Beach Roundabout (Consent) 10. Establish one additional full time employee, Heavy Equipment Operator III in Stormwater Utility, annual cost of $29,800 PLD PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1. Enclave Annexation Program Status Report 2. First Reading Ord. #6548-00 - amendments to fee schedule for land development applications CLK CITY CLERK 1. Library Board - 1 appointment 2. Municipal Code Enforcement Board - 3 appointments CA LEGAL DEPARTMENT Second Reading Ordinances 1. Ord. #6579-00 - Annexation, 110 McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 22.01 (First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc.) 2. Ord. #6588-00 - Annexation, 7 S. McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 21.09 (KB Investments Group) 3. Ord. #6589-00 - Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban, 7 S. McMullen Booth Rd., Sec 16-29-16, M&B 21.09 (KB Investments Group) 4. Ord. #6590-00 - LMDR Zoning, 7 S. McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 21.09 (KB Investments Group) 5. Ord. #6591-00 - Annexation, 18167 US19N, Sec. 29-29-16, M&B 22.02 (St Joe Company) 6. Ord. #6592-00 - Land Use Plan Amendment to Commercial General, 18167 US19N, Sec. 29-29- 16, M&B 22.02 (St Joe Company) 7. Ord. #6593-00 - Commercial Zoning, 18167 US19N, Sec. 29-29-16, M&B 22.02 (St Joe Company) 8. Ord. #6601-00 - amending Operating Budget for Fiscal Year ending 9130100 9. Ord. #6602-00 - amending Capital Improvement Program Report and Budget for Fiscal Year ending 9130100 1012100 2 f Other City Attorney1terris 1. Settlement with St. Petersburg Junior College in the amount $100,000 re The School Board of Pinellas County and the District Board of Trustees of 'St. Petersburg Junior College v, City, (Consent) City Manager Verbal Reports Presentation(s) for Thursday Night 1, Citywide Leadership Class of 2000 2. Briars Smith from County re traffic signals 3. Marketing Person of the Year Award from Florida Natural Gas Association for Roger Harris Other Commission Action Adjourn f i 1012100 3, Clearwater TO: BILL HORNE, INTERIM CITY MANAGER FROM: RALPH STONE, PLANNING DIRECTOR CC:' JOHN ASMAR, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR M.AHSHID ARASTEH, PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR RE: ENCLAVE ANNEXATION PROGRAM STATUS DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2000 In June, 1999 the Planning Department prepared an issue paper evaluating the Special Act approved by the Florida Legislature regarding involuntary annexation ofenclaves. The City has approximately 140 enclaves that are eligible to be annexed through this special act. If the City Commission decides to proceed with the annexation program, the City will be required to pay for the cost of utility extension to the property edge as well as all inipAct fees and outstanding assessments for utility expansion. In November, 1999, the City Commission authorized a limited scope of services with Wade -Trim Consulting for investigation of the enclave annexation program. Wade-Trim sent a package to each enclave property owner including; information about the annexation program, the City's financial obligations regarding the utility extension and a comparison customized to each property evaluating the financial advantages and disadvantages of annexing into the City of Clearwater. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the package sent to each enclave property owner including: E A cover letter from the Planning Department; A letter from Wade-Trim describing the annexation program; A chart customized for the owner calculating the potential savings or costs if tine property is annexed; and A fact sheet with the frequently asked questions about the annexation program. __- ?......, Memorandum to Bill Horne August 22, 2000 Page 2 SUMMARY OF RESPONSES RECEIVED Wade-Trim also contacted each property owner by telephone to determine their level of interest in pursuing annexation. As of this writing, the following responses have been received: In favor of Annexation 23 Not in favor of Annexation 30 No Response to calls' 86 (Reasons for no response: did not return message; no working phone; unlisted phone number; no answering machine on which to leave message) Total Property Owners 139 Wade= Trim revised the estimated utility extension costs to include only those 23 property owners who have indicated a willingness to be annexed into the City. The estimated cost includes the utility extension construction costs, any outstanding assessment fees for previous improvements and'the applicable impact fees. The total estimated cost to provide utility service to the 23 interested property owners is S 370,110. It should be noted that a large portion of the total cost is needed to serve three property owners. It is estimated that approximately $235,500 will be required to serve property owners Joseph Kyle, Elfrida McClenning and Evelyn Wear. The utility extension costs for this extension are substantial due to the construction complexity and length of the extension. This extension can provide service for a total of eight propeilies; however, only three of the eight owners expressed an interest in annexing into the City. RECOMMENDATIONS The. Planning Department recommends that the City proceed with involuntary annexation for the property owners who indicated positive interest with the exception of the three owners with cost-prohibitive extension costs. The remaining 20 property owners could be served by the City for an estimated total cost of S 134,610, which averages S 6,7301, house as a one-time cost. As a comparison, the estimated new revenues to be gained by the City each year for the 20 interested property owners is estimated at $17,228 in new revenue each year. The new revenue estimate includes ad valorem taxes at the current millage rate of 5.5032, new franchise fees and new utility fees. Therefore, the construction expense would be recovered by the City in new revenues in approximately eight years ($134,610 total extension costs divided by 517,228 in new revenues = 7.8 years). The Planning Department requests that the enclave annexation program be scheduled for the work session of the City Commission on October 2, 2000 to provide the Commission with an update of the program. Wade-Trim will be present with the Planning Department staff and prepared to discuss their findings with the Commission. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. I? I [, t t 4 !}. 4 4 O ? Q O i ? C ? C S ? 1? N O ? O ? E 8 O ?F'r F ! pQ ?T pQ QI ] [p Ir pp Q ?? py er ?/ 'y 1f1 Yp y Y3 ? Qj 1 SV © O ' ?" N 00 p p Qf S [JY © ti 115 $ ?O C? . _ ., ', t '.. Cf O'f ? M r r ?- r U., ? N f? to C;r1 r j f:: ^ H N N N N N N N N Vol H M1 N N N N N N N N N N 1f rtyl }7 , ° t}4 G?i g a?i ry $ $ Q g ad n cLn w U g g ??o tm? s »a u.; h ?7 cD LO ? y SL} r?i N P? - O o app ? s m N O q i Q 4 C } I+Y} .y?r i?: ;..'tt r+ [47V7I'. '~ pp pp + . ?5 OO ? 8 pC p C S p O O r? i S pg q q 0 W P Hl O ?i'1 ?i'7 C7 r• N kn ao r` III. N Cti aC ~!, N ' ? 8 ? 8 $ $ $ $ 8 $ $ S $ S S S g B ? S S S g $ •.SV • ? § a g 1 OIL '^'.?.5«r r M M •LU iit ?t W u a? ? c c d d) d) tu dl _ rn 5 f3 ue o n C L ? c i U E a O c Z ati I a b Cry o r ' s . , s 4 -5 '?' ? U rn z U yr t ci N a a 5:: U ? ro rir ? a 8,i :Q•,` ' : ? .t•. z o ski c4 rn rnn `r "? p' u•' g ° ps o to Y m - °1 , i'?% f ^ [Y] rr t ^ Oa co p qq Q1 ^ M r Cri N 7 co ['1 r - N C-1 co N N N q N N .? w N ' . i ' • ,'1 ' S 1 1?? Ey yg 7+ 1 G fCp L ¢ ?+ ? ? F L . i t C O 4' 92 ¢ Qr S C m N } C ' ? N C w • , ` .Y1 m O1 u' y •'" to !? • i .?' ' 2 IIn In 0) x "?'f .J y J Ln Cn to w 3 .. : y S (n P? u m ° v wS r- un N v C7, rn CO E`n v co co ?n r? z. di I N I E r ? I I (rj I E i I d tm r ? I Y I d I I 7 1 I I y C I I a o z U k 1z ; July 14, 2000 Mr. Faisal Alkholaifi 3151 Johns Parkway Clearwater, FL 33759 Dear Mr. Alkholaifi: The City of Clearwater has undertaken a public information program to identify properties that are not currently part of the City but whose owners desire to annex into the City. The consulting firm of Wade-Trim, Inc. is conducting this program for the City. Enclosed with this letter are materials prepared by Wade-Trim, Inc. that will provide you with facts and information regarding annexation into the City of Clearwater. After you review the enclosed materials, please contact Brad Cornelius of Wade-Trim toll-free at (888) 499-9624 or e-mail at bcornelius@wadetrim.com or Etim Udoh of the City of Clearwater at (727) 562- 4578 or e-mail at eudoh@clearwater-fl.com. Please contact Brad to express your interest in annexation or to ask any questions or request additional information. Sincerely, Ralph Stone Planning Director Enclosures cc: Wade-Trim, Inc, BmN J. r11: t,(.S'f, ,\IA?'(l!t-CU?1JlI5tilOi l:l: ,LII.,IOHNSON, VICE MAYOR- COMMI'NON11t ton CI AI:x, { O;•I?IliS!i1 Cfi I:I) I IART, COMMISSIONER ru I I(N PF.C, Co IV i`:IOtiI??I °E:C)tlAi, lil.ll'LOl',tii;3'f AC:1) AFFIIt:?[ATIV[i :1C'I'IC'i7! i;111`1.t,Y:.R'? CITY' OE CLE'ARWATER' PLANNING c& DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PosT OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEIRWATER, FLowDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BuiLDING, 100 SouT1I MYRTLE AVENUF, CLFARWATFR, RolaDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 I:Ax (727) 562.4576 Jury 14, 2000 Re: Property Located at 3151 Johns Parkway Parcel # 16/29/16/44172/00010110 Dear Mr. Alkholaifi: The City of Clearwater is working to improve the quality and efficiency of public services provided to its citizens. One of the hurdles to providing high quality municipal services Is the multiple enclaves of unincorporated property completely surrounded by the City boundaries. These enclaves present difficulties in providing responsive police and fire protection as well as cost effective utility services. The City of Clearwater is sending you this letter because records indicate that you own property within an enclave. Last year, the Florida Legislature gave cities In Pinellas County the ability to extend water and sewer service at a limited cost to the property owner of enclaves that annexed into the City of Clearwater. If you agree to be annexed, the City of Clearwater will pay the cost to extend water and/or sewer lines to the edge of your property. The City is contacting you to determine if you are interested in voluntarily annexing your property into the city limits and taking full advantage of this one-time. opportunity to connect your home to the City's sewer and/or water systems with the City paying the cost to extend the utility lines to your property. Wade-Trim is working for the City of Clearwater on this-project and has prepared the enclosed brochure with the most frequently asked questions and answers about annexation. In addition, Wade-Trim has prepared an estimate of the difference in costs if you should decide to voluntarily annex into the City of Clearwater. This estimate has been customized to reflect the 1999 taxable assessed value of your property. After you review this information, we would appreciate hearing from you if you are interested in voluntarily annexing your property or if you have any questions. Please call me toll-free at 1-888-499-9624 or e-mail at bcornellus@wadetrim.com. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, WADE-TRIM, INC. 1 (D- cz. Brad Cornelius, AICP Professional Planner BTC:IIa P:1C1w203410I MORD%Off-adminWlette rannex.doc Enclosures , cc: Cynthia Hardin, AICP, City of Clearwater - Planning & Development Services Engineering - Landscape Architecture - Planning - Sciences - Surveying PL LC Flag. No. 0000121 t 4919 Memorial Highway - Suite 200 - Tampa, FL 33634 - 813.882.8366 - 888.499.9624 - FAX: 813.884.5990 - www.widijtrim.com r .a Alkholaifl, Faisal 3151 Johns Parlwav Annual Costs Tax/Fee/Charge Before Annexation After Annexation Property Tax 1 2 $1,366 $1,413 Electric Utility Tax 4 $0 $120 Telephone Franchise Fee 5 $0 $6 Tele hone Utility Tax (5) $0 $42 Water/Sewer Utility Tax 6 $0 $60 Water/Sewer Surcharge 7 $75 $0 Sewer User Fes 8 NA $300 Stormwater Utility Fee 3 $0 $50 Electric Franchise Fee 4 $0 $72 Septic Abandonment/Sewer Hook-U Cost 1 NA $2,500 Total $1,441 $4,563 Potential BenefiWSavinas $3,122 Cost Sewer Line Assessment Paid b City 9 $1,875 Sewer Impact Fee Paid by City $900 Septic Pumping/Maintenance Eliminated (10) $180 $2,955 Benefit !Votes: (1) Based on County Millage Rate of 22.2113 Mills and City Millage Rate of 22.9775 Mills. (2) Property Tax Based on 1999 'taxable Value of Property per Pinellas County Property Appraiser. (3) 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) 0 $4.17/month. (4) Based an Yearly Electric Bill of '."1,200. Charges Vary Based on Actual Consumption/Use. (5) Based on Yearly Telephone Blli of $600. Charges Vary Based on Actual Consumption/Use. (6) Based on Yearly Water/Sewer Bill of $600. Charges Vary Based on Actual Consumption/Use. (7) Based on Yearly Water Bill of $300. Charges Vary Based on Actual Consumption/Use. Applies to Clearwater Utility customers not located within Clearwater city limits. (8) Charges Vary Based On Actual Consumption/Use. (9) Parcel's Proportionate Share Based on Estimated Construction Costs Plus 10% Design Cost. Assessment cost calculated by the City of Clearwater. (10) Septic Tank Pump Out Recommended Once Every Two to Three Years. (11) Average Cost to Abandon Septic Tank and Connect to City Sewer. Actual Cost Will Vary. 4T Lolty Of Clea'' r,--", auie- Enclawe Annex"ation WHAT is annexation? Annexation is the addition of property into a city. When a property is annexed, the city's boundaries are expanded to include that property. rk? ?t k !'? ??4 DOES the City of Clearwater have any enclaves within its city boundaries? The City of Clearwater has over 140 'SHY .would a city want to- enclaves of 1, .:.acre, or less with approximately, 13g different property annex properly? ; owners. When city boundaries are regularly drawn and easily understood, city services such as IS there a plan to annex police and fire protection as well as water these enclaves into the City and sewer systems are more efficiently provided to its citizens. of Clearwater? WHAT is an enclave'? An enclave is a property or properties that is completely surrounded on all sides by a city but is not within the boundaries of that city. An enclave is like a missing piece in the middle of a jigsaw puzzle, The Florida Legislature gave cities in Pinellas County an opportunity to annex enclaves that are less than one acre in size. The City of Clearwater wants to know if you and other property owners of these enclaves are interested in VOLUNTARILY ANNEXING into the City of Clearwater. If I am interested in voluntary annexation or want more information, who should I call? For more information please call Brad Cornelius from the City's consulting firm Wade-Trim. You can contact Brad at the toil-free telephone number of 1-888-499-9624 (Monday - Friday, 8:30 A.M. - 5:00 P.M,) or e-mail at bcornelius@wadetrim.com. SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item 0 Meeting Date: Approve settlement with St. Petersburg Junior College in the amount of $100,000 in the case entitled THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTYAND THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF ST. PETERSBURG JUNIOR COLLEGE v. CITY OF CLEARWATER, Case No. 99••7479-CI-08. and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The City of Clearwater established its stormwater utility ordinance, 505890 on January 1, 1991. • In 1996 the School Board of Pinellas County and Board of Trustees of St. Petersburg Junior College filed suit against the City of St. Petersburg, challenging that City's imposition of a stormwater service fee to state properties. The School Board and Junior College are political subdivisions of the State of Florida. • The trial court ruled in favor of the School Board and SPJC holding that St. Pete's stormwater utility services charge was a special assessment that the School Board and Junior College were immune and exempt from payment of said stormwater fees and ordered that all fees be returned. • The School Board and Board of Trustees of St. Petersburg Junior College tiled a suit for Declaratory Judgment and Damages against the City of Clearwater on November 9, 1999. • SPJC has paid the City of Clearwater stormwater fees totaling $157,309.50, and has paid no fees since March, 1998. A rough estimate of legal interest (10%) on this amount, if the City loses the case, is in excess of $135,000. • The City has filed a counterclaim against SPJC for $90,000.00 for unpaid fees owed to the City. • The claim SPJC totals approximately $290,000.00. Authorization is sought to settle all claims SPJC has against the City for $100,000.00. This will not settle the claim the Pinellas County School Board has against the City. • An amount sufficient to cover this settlement was included in the 1998 utility rate study calculations. • Funding for this settlement will be provided by a first quarter budget amendment allocating the $100,000 from the unappropriated retained earnings of the Stormwater Fund. Reviewed by: Origins' g ept: Costs $100,000 Legal Info Tech NA Legal Total Budget Public. Works User D pt. ?'%? !/ Funding Source: Purchasing -'WA DCM/ACM PWA/Stormwaler c?rt??ttmr,«vnr Current Fiscal Year Risk Mgmt NA Other NA Attachments 0jWFjtinR x Other Appropriation Code: Submitted by: CJ None 419-01365-548000-539-000 City Mana er Printed on recvtted paper Rev. 2198