The URL can be used to link to this page

10/03/1996 1 Agen j.1 .y ai y i. '20 ?1. {??t I da: 10-3-96 City Commission Meeting 10-3-96 note: 9-30-96 Preliminary (worksession) Agenda and paperwork that was in package initially but then not continued onto Thursday's agenda is at the back of this agenda pack. ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING Thursday, October 3, 1996 - 6:00 P.M. - Chambers 1. Invocation 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Service Awards 4. Introductions and Awards 5. Presentations: a) Historic Preservation Board - Annual Report 6. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting 9119/96 & Special Meeting 9/10196 (Downtown Projects) 7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda 1. None. 2. Mayor. 3. None. 4. Proclamation: Fire Prevention Week - 10/6-12196 2 city workers from Clearwater's Sister City, Nagano, Japan, introduced themselves and thanked the Mayor, Clearwater & its citizens. 5. a) Report received, 6. Approved as submitted. Harry Silcox apoligized for "losing his cool" at the last meeting. Expressed concerns improvements at the airpark have been delayed. John-Doran, representing the Clearwater Beach Association, invited people to attend the 10/23/96 Association Town Meeting at which the commuter rail proposal will be discussed. Announced the Association's Octoberfest on 10/26/96 from 4 to 8 p.m. Jo vich requested an answer to his concerns regarding the relocation of water meters being a taking of his property. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. 9. 10. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6083- 96 - Vacating N 25' & S 25' of the W 75' of Saber Drive r-o-w between Lot 20, Blk D, and Lot 1, Blk G, on plat of Countrypark Sub., subject to it being retained as a drainage, utility easement (City, V96-09)(EN) Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property {Pinellas County Teachers Credit Union) located at 2571 Drew St., Campus Walk, Lot 2A (Alpaugh, THE & Sitton d/b/s ABS Properties, SV96-18) Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property (Harborview Center) located at 300 Cleveland St., Rompon's and Baskin's Corrected Map of Causeway Business District, Blk 1 & 3-5; Edward Mill's Sub., Lots 3 less street, 4 & 5 (City, SV96-19) 8. Approved. Ord. #6083-96 passed 1 st reading. 9. Approved 15.62 sq.ft. area variance to allow 26.12 sq.ft. of attached sign area, and ratio variance of 0.37 sq.ft. to allow 1.87 sq.ft. of sign area per foot of building width. 10. Approved variance to allow a freestanding sign 128 sq.ft. in area, 20' high and set back 5' from street r-o-w, and variance to allow 3 message changes per hour on an electronic reader board sign subject to the condition the sign faces shall be positioned at an angle no greater than 90 degrees to each other. 1013/96 Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances 11. Ord. #6071-96 - Amending Comprehensive 11. Ord. #6071-96 adopted. Plan including amendments to future land use element as required by F.S.163, related to the Public Education Facility Siting Act - SEE #41 a also 12. Ord. #6075-96 - revising appointment 12. Ord. #6075-96 adopted. standards for Planning and Zoning & Development Code Adjustment Boards (LDCA96-16) 13. Ord. #6076-96 - Amending Secs. 40.034, 13. Ord. #6076-96 adopted. 40.043, 40.064, 40.084, 40.104 & 41.053 to allow noncommercial parking as a conditional use in single family residential districts (LOCA96-12) 14. Ord. #6080-96 - Annexation for property 14. Ord. #6080-96 adopted. located at 1751 Ragland Ave., Clearwater Manor, Lot 73 (Kenneth Schilling 1 Terence A. & Kell! J. Suiters, A96-25) 15. Ord. #6081-96 - RS-8 Zoning for property 15•. Ord. #6081-96 adopted. located at 1751 Ragland Ave., Clearwater Manor, Lot 73 (Kenneth Schilling I Terence A. & Kelli J. Suiters, A96-25) 16. Ord. #6082-96 - Vacating existing 10' 16. Ord. #6082-96 adopted. drainage & utility easement lying along SE side of Lot 12, Forest Wood Estates (David D. & Kathleen Clausen, V96-11) 17. Ord. #6085-96 - to amend Sec. 33.028 to 17. Ord. #6085-96 adopted. authorize City Manager to approve vessel slip rent increases up to 10% annually CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (Items #18-34) - Approved as submitted less #26. The following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually. 18. Agreement with Ernst & Young LLP for auditing services for 5 fiscal years ending 9130196 through 2000, for a total not to exceed $426,000 (FN) 19. Purchase of various steel gas materials to: The Avanti Company, Avon Park, FL, est. $27,065.60; ATS Industries, Inc., Safety Harbor, FL, est. $45,763.88; Equipment Control Company, Norcross, GA, est. $12,088.25; Empire Pipe & Supply Company, Tampa, FL, est. 1013196 2 11 $15,795; Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., Pinellas Park, FL, est. $1,845.54; Florida Industrial Products, Tampa, FL, est. $3,133.21; Hughes Supply, Inc., Clearwater, FL, est. $13,815.76; M.T. Deason Company, Birmingham, AL, est. $57,053.89; Stuart Steel Protection Corp., Somerset, NJ, est. $1,638.40; Utilities Supply, Loganville, GA, est. $2,052; for a total est. $180,251.53 (GAS) 20. Contract for installation of polyethylene gas mains on Darlington Road, from US19 West to Mitchell Blvd., Marine Parkway from US19 West to Madison Rd., & Grand Blvd. from Madison Rd. North to the Pithlachascotee River to Heuer Utility Contractors, Inc., Clearwater, FL, at an est. $337,760 (Pasco County Gas Expansion - Phase IV) (GAS) 21. (Cont. from 9/19/96) Approve recommendations of Technical Review Committee for allocation of $38,000 in additional city social service funds which were approved by the Commission during budget hearings (HM) 22. Contract for long term disability insurance for employees not covered by City's Pension Plan to Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Chattanooga, TN, for the period 11/1/96- 10/30/97, at an est. $30,984 (HR) 23. C.O.#4 for Countryside Recreation Center to Bollenback Builders, Inc., for $4,100.53, for new total $1,453,126.53 (PR) 24. C.O.#s 1, 2 & 3 for Carpenter Field Clubhouse Renovations to Oakhurst Construction Co., Inc., Seminole, FL, for $25,570 (PR) 25. Approve 6 month trial period 110/l/96-3/31/97) of opening 5 recreational complexes including the recreation centers at Clearwater Beach, Ross Norton Park, Martin Luther King, Morningside & Countryside on Sunday afternoons from 1 p.m. until 5 'p.m., at an est. $17,945 (PR) 26. Citywide Streetlight Banner Program based on recommended locations at a cost not to exceed $20,000 (TR) - APPROVED. 27. Non-Exclusive License Agreement for vehicular parking upon portion of City r-o-w easement for Clearwater Pass Bridge with Lane Clearwater, an Illinois Limited Partnership d/b/a Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort, having primary 5 year term, with initial year license fee of $3,200 payable $800 quarterly in advance, then $3,600 annually thereafter for remaining 4 years, payable $900 quarterly in advance, with option to extend agreement for 4 additional terms of 5 years each, providing for annual fee adjustment of not less than 3% or'more than 5% based on annual CPI (EN) 28. Award of Marshall Street WWTP Odor Control & Piping Modifications to Westra Construction Corp., Palmetto, FL, for $1,263,000 (EN) 29. Contract for test installation of reclaimed water main using horizontal directional drilling on Windward Passage to Kimmins Contracting Corp., Tampa, FL, for $60,360 (EN) 30. Pinellas Planning Council - Reappoint Commission Seel for term 12/30/96-12/30/98 (CLK) 31. Modification of water easement - Sun Watch, Inc. (CA) 32. Water main easement - Sec. 16-29-16 (Daniel & Virginia Milton) (CA) 33. Ingress, Egress and Utility Easement - Sunset Oaks, Lot 1 (McDonald's) (CA) 34. Rescind appointment of Commissioner Johnson as alternate voting delegate to National League of Cities conference; appoint Commissioner Hooper as alternate voting delegate OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT 35. Confirm co-sponsorship and waiver of City 35. Confirmed. Authorized. fees for special events: Jazz Holiday, Fun 'n Sun, Fourth of July, Family Holiday Traditions and Parade, Turkey Trot, North Greenwood 10/3/96 3 Street Festival, Martin Luther King Parade, and 3 new events: Saturdays in the City, Memorial Day & Clearwater Pass Bridge Run, at an est. $134,222 ($49,720 cash contributions & $84,502 in-kind); authorize event sponsors to approve vendors (PR) a) Saturday in the City b) Jazz Holiday funding request 36. (Cont. from 9/19/96) Approve ranking of 36. Remanded to Engineering to establish prospective Fixed Base Operators to furnish standards of performance, review of financial aviation services at Clearwater Airpark (EN) planning and rate of return and research other airpark's operations and finances; not to 37. First Reading Ord. #6099-96 - amending Sec. 2.561(7) authorizing City Manager to approve change orders up to $25,000 (FN) 38. Municipal Code Enforcement Board - 3 appointments (CLK) 39. Planning and Zoning Board - 1 appointment (CLK) 40. Other Pending Matters a) Approved $5,000 cash contribution. b) Approved additional $20,000 for a total of $25,000. exceed 9 months. 37. Approved. Ord. #6099-96 passed 1 st reading. 38. Appointed Lawrence Tiernan to complete an unexpired term. Appointed Arthur Walsh to begin a term 1 111196 & Reappointed Dennis Henegar. 39. Appointed Douglas Hilkert. 40. None. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS 41. Resolutions a) Res. #96-54 - authorizing transmittal to a) Res. #96-54 adopted. appropriate agencies of a proposed ordinance (Ord. #6071-96) amending the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Element as required by F.S. 163, and establishing an alternative review process for the coordination and siting of Public School Facilities 42. Other City Attorney Items a) Approve Order for Jamminz Appeal a) Approved. 43. City Manager Verbal Reports City Manager announced opening of City's world wide web site. She requested Commissioners wanting to be considered for National League of Cities (NLC) steering committees let her know. She reported a letter will be going to Florida Power re the % of street lights that are out and the need to address City's payment for same. She reminded the Commission of the Dumpster Screening contest on 1014196 at 9:00 a.m. 1013196 4 44. Other Commission Action Bard questioned a fax received re Harborview Center. The City Manager indicated the City has been told by. Rowe there may be a problem with the budget. Staff is not sure their numbers are correct and will be meeting with there. She stated she will not be back to the Commission for more-money. ' Hooper indicated he had toured the North Greenwood area and found the street lights in that neighborhood to be "less than brilliant". Deputy City Manager Rice indicated this will be addressed. Hgoper questioned the status of the gas system audit. It was indicated work is progressing and the report should come to the Commission in January. 45, Adjournment - 9:01 p.m. i i ?.1 10/3/96 5 f i': F: -' .: , ??; ,y, .;i' ? . 'In?i:.'i?jy'?`e,r:'S-TF';MJ!ry.?4,".?;.i'?•,1`:;y,. i';'. c...?^f..l'.^.. e? ?•l e. ..i ? ..... ., .. ? - ? _ _ ._... CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartmental Correspondence TO: Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk SUBJECT: Follow up from September 30, 1996 Work Session COPIES: Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager DATE: October 1, 1996 In response to questions raised at the September 30, 1996, Work Session the following answers are in final agenda order. w14A, Aevv\ Item #10 - Haborview Marquee - attached are the draft minutes of the Design Review Board discussion regarding this item. Item #21 - Social Service Funding, Tampa Bay Harvest - we have been told an estimated 9,500 Clearwater citizens are served by Tampa Bay Harvest. Item #34 - NLC Delegate - Commissioner Johnson will not be attending the NLC Conference. Therefore, it is necessary to rescind his appointment as voting alternate and appoint Commissioner Hooper who will be attending. Item #35 - City Co-sponsored Special Events - someone from Jazz Holiday and Saturday in the City will be present Thursday night. Item #36 - Airpark FBO - the missing pages from the Clearwater Flying Corporation proposal are included in your pack. The Business Plan is included with this item, as well as the Executive Summary of the Master Plan. The entire Master Plan is a 2" document which includes a lot of raw data. If anyone wishes to review it, it is available in the Engineering Office or a copy can be made. Attached is information regarding the investments made over the past 15 years by the current FBO. Item #38 - Municipal Code Enforcement Board - uUachad is the listing of the current members with their occupation indicated. Also the item has been revised to add more nominees. 9130196 Work Session Follow Up Page 2 Item #39 - Planning and Zoning Board - the item has been revised to add more nominees. Item #42a - 3amminz' - the order is being prepared and its approval has been agendaed for Thursday night. Miscellaneous: i> Chief Klein has been asked to see if community service can be a requirement in order to receive service at the homeless shelter. tL Y{ i? ;? 't !5' TO: Mayor Rita Garvey FROM: Betty J. Blunt, Confidential Clerk Receptionist, COPIES: City Commissioners, Betty Deptula, Cyndie Goudeau SUBJECT: Presentation at the October 3, 1966 City Commission Meeting DATE: October 3, 1996 The following presentations will be made at the October 3, 1996 City Commission Meeting: PROCLAMATION FIRE PREVENTION WEEK - Art "Sparky" Brown, Public Education OWIcer ?'_xa'u......[vi ails'..: t.l,r:.?:Skk.w'i Y..ir siI'a. s<rr.w..iyhw ir.? v _ _ e ..4..x 3 r .w.._ .i :. •x ........... .. .. .. .- - Ai . sq CITY OF CLEARWATER HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD W .f 1996 ANNUAL REPOR'T' FOR CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION i PREPARED BY: CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT September 1996 t4 ?.?? yS'. ?-:. ..:3 ii ?. i?Yn ? e vii: si: 'v. ?i ...vk%. •. ».,}r. n. ..r.. s .. .. _.-- _- __ 0 1 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ANNUAL REPORT October 3, 1996 90\, L Introduction Historic Preservation Board Members: David Berry, Chairperson Margaret Kiehl, Vice-Chairperson Jean Stuart Ric Ortega Clorinda `Cookie' Gilreath xith thanks to former member, Stephen Alosa, past Chairperson and Don C. McCarty, Senior Planner, as Staff Liaison IL History & Background The restructured five member Historic Preservation Board was established by the City Commission on October 14, 1985. The purpose of the Board is to provide advice and assistance to the City on historic matters pertaining to Clearwater. The regular Board meetings are held on the third Tuesday of each month at 1:00 p.m. at the historic Plumb House located on S. Greenwood Avenue. The Historic Preservation Board members are appointed by the City Commission to four year terms. The composition of this Board has changed significantly this year due both to previous Board members resignations and their moving from the City of Clearwater. Three new members have been appointed and started serving this current year. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Annual Report page 4- t 11. The Past Year During 1996, the Historic Preservation Board will meet on eight occasions to discuss and act upon various topics relating to historic preservation efforts and programs in our community. It is difficult to evaluate this Board's accomplishments on an annual basis, as the Board is advisory in nature. The Board is generally guided by the goals and objectives contained in the 19861ustoric preservation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Primary objectives include the historic identification marker program which was designed to identify and memorialize significant historic places within Clearwater. This program is coordinated with the members of the Clearwater Historical Society and the Pinellas County Historical Society. Examples of this program include the downtown post office commemorative marker, the Harbor Oaks National Register Historic District marker, and the Seminole Bridge site, which was the location of the first wooden bridge connecting the mainland with Clearwater Beach. In an effort to make our community aware of the Board's activities, a letter writing campaign was introduced, recognizing the citizens of Clearwater for their sensitivity to historic preservation activities, and encouraging participation in helping to preserve the rich heritage of Clearwater. The letters are intended to acknowledge sensitive design restorations and material treatments and applications. The Board has made recommendations to the City Commission with regard to historic properties and has researched items for the City Commission to assist in the decision making process, such as the naming of the downtown Station Square urban mini-park in 1991. 111. Future Board Priority Activities During the next year the Board will continue to work on the following activities: • The continuation of the historic preservation identification marker program; HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Annual Rcport page -2- 5C?' • Assist the City with its pending State of Florida Historic Grant Application; • Continue to participate and assist in coordinating historic preservation awareness to the community; and • The continuation of researching historic items for the Design Review Board, the Planning and Zoning Board as well as the City Commission. IV. Conclusion The members of the Historic Preservation Board wish to thank the City Commission for their support and for the opportunity to serve the citizens of this City. We look forward to another year of success and accomplishment. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Annual Report b page -3- t 4 .F . i; i ` fe. d r. Item #8 ?, I i F i c Item 11 r CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Meeting Dale Agenda Cover Memorandum SUBJECT: Vacation Request 96-09 Saber Drive (City of Clearwater) RE COMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the City's request to vacate the North 25 feet and the South 25 feet of the East 75 feet of Saber Drive between Lot 20, Block D, and Lot 1, Block G, as shown on the Plat of Countrypark Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 74, Pages 69 through 71 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, subject to it being retained as a drainage, utility easement, and pass Ordinance No. 6083-96 on first reading. SUMMARY: • The City of Clearwater is in the process of extending Landmark Drive, south from Enterprise Road East to Chautauqua Park. • The property owners in Countrypark Subdivision do not want a paved connection between Landmark Drive and Saber Drive in their subdivision. • The best way to eliminate a paved connection, both now and in the future, is to vacate a portion of Saber Drive right- of-way. • As part of the Landmark Drive project, the City will be removing the Eastern 75 feet of Saber Drive pavement, and installing a 6 foot wide sidewalk down the center. • The City has a 6" water line in the right-of-way. • General Telephone, Florida Power and Time Warner have reviewed the proposed vacation request and have no objections. • This application. has been reviewed by the various City Departments concerned with vacations, and there were no objections. • The City Engineer recommends that this vacation request be approved. • The second and final reading and adoption of Ordinance 6083-96 will be held until the right-of-way for Landmark Drive is conveyed from Mr. Vogel. Reviewed by: Legal <1 2f 2' Budget I Originating Dept. Engineering Department User Dept. Purchasing NIA Risk Mgmt. NNI , is NIA " ACM ENG. OTHER _ NIA Advertised: Date: 9/19196 & 9126!96 Paper. Tampa Tribune Not required: Atrected parties notified X Submitted W. C' Vrn?rrrrorr?esvy ? REV. 9124196 Not Required Costs: Commission Action (Current FY) + Approved Funding source: Capt. Lnp. Operating Other Approved w1conditions Denied Cont'd to codc(s) Attachments: Application Ordinance Location Map mi Vacation Number 96-09 City of Clearwater V A C A T I O N R E Q U E S T P R O C E S S I N G S H E E T PLEASE REVIEW THIS VACATION IN TERMS OF YOUR PRESENT USE AND FUTURE NEED FOR THE PROPERTY. INDICATE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW: REFERENCE ATLAS SHEET NO 233B SECTION 32 TOWNSHIP 28S RANGE 16E 1. ENGINEERING SERV CES: / REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY : .'_,N-rr??r DATE : dC • I'f COMMENTS: This vacation initiated by the CRy engineer in response to citizen concerns expressed in the Public 4earing for Landmark Drive Extension. No objection to vacating the North 25' and the South 25' of the East 751 of Saber Drive, in Countrypark Subdivision, subject to it being retained as a drainage & utility easement. The remaining 10 foot parcel of right-of--way down the center of Saber Drive will be for the new sidewalk. 2. CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT: REVIEWED BY: S: L_>*/ft-ZrY APPROVED BY: r DATE : rh /? COMMENTS : Central Permitting has no objection to vation, subject to Engineering comments. 8/23/96 3. GAS DEPARTMEN _ REVIEWED BY :% .gQ APPROVED BY: B DATE: 61e,51R, COMMENTS: ?o Ob?L&4iorti. 4. CITY ENGINEER: REVIEWED AND APPROVEI:) BY: L-W..c £ DATE: F/J7Ll COMMENTS: I Jam"'"" """ f 4 I I ADVERTISING DATE: 5./05/96 AND 9/12/96 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 9/19/96 COMMISSION ACTION:----APPROVED----CONTINUED----TABLED----DENIED---- ORDINANCE NO. DATE OF ADOPTION RECORDED IN 0. R. BOOK: PAGE: LETTER TO PROPERTY OWNER ADVISING COMPLETION OF VACATION VACATION CARD FILE: VACATION 96.09 SABER DRIVE.ENG f CITY OF CLEARWATER - ENGINEERING SERVICES FORM NUMBER 1311-0104 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE - ROOM 211 P.O. BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FL. 34618-4748 PH. (813) 562-4747 V A C A T I O N R E Q U E S T F I L I N G F 0 R M 1. NAME OF APPLICANT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: NAME: RICHARD J. BALER, CITY ENGINEER PHONE: 562--4747 ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FL 34618-4748 HEREBY PETITION THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE VACATION OF THE FOLLOWING: ? EASEMENT TYPE: XX RIGHT-OF-WAY ? ALLEY OTHER 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED, IE: IF IT IS A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT, DESCRIBE WHICH PORTION, IF IT IS AN ALLEY, DESCRIBE FROM WHERE TO WHERE OR WHAT LOT/S IT ABUTS, IF IT IS A RIGHT-OF-WAY DESCRIBE HOW MUCH TO BE VACATED. The North 25' and the South 25' of the East 75' of Saber Drive, in Countrypark Subdivision. 3. STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION: NA 4. PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY: ELIMINATE FUTURE VEHICULAR CONNECTION FROM COUNTRYPARK SUBDIVISION TO LANDMARK DRIVE 5. ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY: RS -6 FILE - FORM REVISED VACFORMI.WJX 05/14/96 Priniod on raeycl4d paper 0 PAGE 1 OF 2 .- 6.ATTACHMENTS: LAND SURVEY OF PROPERTY IS REQUIRED IF THIS VACATION INVOLVES AN EXISTING ENCROACHMENT. X DRAWING SHOWING PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY (SURVEY, PLOT PLAN, ETC.) X SEE ORDINANCE 5969-96 (ATTACHED) FOR FEE SCHEDULE THE FOLLOWING LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION ARE REQUIRED: (LIST OF CONTACT PERSONS FOR THE UTILITIES IS ATTACHED) X FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION X GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY X TIME WARNER CABLE OTHER 7. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER (PLEASE PRINT) s. NAME: CITY OF CLEARWATER PHONE: 562-4747 ADDRESS: F.O. BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FL. 34618-4748 8. OWNERS SIGNATURE Q STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF PINELLAS) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by who is personally know to me or who has produced C as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Notary Public, Commission No.131 !)L1 j 2 Fe- (Name of Notary typed, printed or stamped) OFFICIAL NUPAIIY 55ZL ALICE R EMMAN NOTARY I'UI3LIC SPATE OF FLORIVA COMMISSION No. CC31?417 hIYCOMI?ILSSION SP.OCI'. 2,1997 PriMad on 16CVCW paper PAGE 2 OF 2 Pxv. 03/15/96 ¦ e AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, VACATING THE NORTH 25 FEET AND THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF THE WEST 75 FEET OF SABER DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN LOT 20, BLOCK D, AND LOT 1, BLOCK G, COUNTRYPARK SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHICH IS RETAINED OVER THE FULL WIDTH THEREOF, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Richard Baler, City Engineer, has requested that the City vacate the right-of-way described In ExhibitA attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that said right-of-way Is not necessary for municipal use and It is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the general, public that the same be vacated; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Sed Qn 1. The following: The North 25 feet and the South 25 feet of the West 75 feet of Saber Drive right-of-way between Lot 20, Block D, and Lot 1, Block G, as shown on the Plat of Countrypark Subdivision as recorded In Plat Book 74, Pages 69 through 71 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater quitclaims and releases all of its right, title and Interest thereto, except that the City of Clearwater hereby retains a drainage and utility easement over the full width of the described property for the installation and maintenance of any and all public utilities thereon. film 2. The City Cleric shall record this ordinance In the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption. Sectlon3 This ordinance shall take effect Immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and and legal sufficiency: John Carassas ' Assistant City Attorney Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissloner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk C f 1, Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum item p: Y' Meeting Date: SUBJECT: Variance to the Sign Regulations; 2571 Drew St.; ABS Properties/Pinellas County Teachers Credit Union (Owner/Applicant); Gene Maxon Associates, Inc. (Representative). (SV 96-18) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the following variances: (1) an area variance of 15.62 square feet from the permitted 10.5 square feet to allow 26.12 square feet of attached sign area, and (2) a ratio variance of 0.37 square feet of sign area per foot of building width to allow 1.87 square feet of sign area per foot of building width, on property identified as Lot 2-A, Campus Walk Subdivision, for' meeting Sec. 45.24, Standards for Approval, items (1)-(4). M and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: • This property Is located on the south side of Drew St., west of U.S. 19, and is in the Highway Commercial zoning district. • The applicant is requesting the following variances: (1) an area variance of 15.62 square feet from the permitted 10.5 square feet to allow 26.12 square feet of attached sign area on the automatic teller machine (ATM) building, and (2) a ratio variance of 0.37 square feet of sign area per foot of building width to allow a ratio of 1.87 square feet of sign area per foot of building width on the ATM building. • The applicant proposes to construct a small building near the entrance to this shopping center for an ATM. Signs will be placed on the north, south and west sides of the building. Only the signs on the north and west sides will be viewable from off property and, therefore, only those signs are regulated by the City. The signs which are proposed on the north and west sides, however, exceed the area and ratio allowances of the code. Reviewed by: Originating P7 partment: Costs: Commission Action: Legal 4:A ";:{N11? "` "`i:: Cdr?;ra(' erMEttlrrp:. : ::.. ;NIA GJ Approved Budget z}r :x?:NIA><;{r':: ....... ?j ? Total ? Approved W/Conditions :.: Purchasing €$><:. ,: :.r;<: , ,.; ;Nh4:?.=.::-..?. ? User Department: = .:..: ? Denied Risk Mgmt. ft fR?A€5€>'s C i ilrAl ormlttin 4 ;:t Currant Fiscal Year ? Continued to: rr:ix,•. 18 Funding Source: ACM ? capital Improvement: CRT Advertised: ? Operating Da«te3 ? Attachments: other: i?pp?r...... , ..... .. '. ..... `Appiicatio?°<; ?w':?>? .: . Submitted ? Not Required Appropriation Code ....... .. . Application Worksheet bye Affected Parties: Maps ® Notified ? None Cl ant,gor ? hot Required 0 Printed on recycled paper SV 96-18 Page 2 The following table provides summary information regarding the proposed signs: `f.: ,! 5 k7i.}{7.:i}}:^}'r:':ti:}.`"i.: i?i:.,;;i:.S::?::::.... '. .<..y .•, ./?'?.u?.;:'r:kvr:.•.o ?F ::.:..:.+ai .x•v-..:. w-.::. .::.:.w. •:••... r..,,n L,. •. n.r :..R. r4C<: .r.:,$...; G.: .:, .., ... .. s? ..; „ .. a: Y ?` rmatfon ,'r+t}}.?:r,}:':Y'.e.:S,:h;n+:.i?.::.:,..•:.:.;...:{'?:::r..,;? .::::.:... ....:.:... ..:}s:,../,,.^::{. .¢; .; .;..:.:.. ?.:: .:::., .; ,.sa!rst-:a: ?,.; t::. ,:.w..: ....:. ::,.•,v i%?' Jn?'!v• .. o-1 r. ::...::...::: .. .. ... :,?;? ',..>}:>.r.:;{::•..,.Lr.i.;.:::.:v:':i•.ar.r;.}F..;.:: ?: ?r-:'rr::: :•?. ... ! . s ... . .. ,. ??n+f,.::'F. f3.f:.:.nxn>r.v ,.•. r..:.:/...t i. i. .. t, -:,...:. .... .,... .... , .. .. .:....:: .... t:f•'".'<'?•;,;,' Type of signs Attached Yes Location/orientation of signs Drew St. Yes Area 26.12 sq. ft.* 10.5 sq. ft. Ratio 1.87 sq. ft. of sign area per 1.5 sq. ft. of sign area per linear ft. of building width linear ft, of building width * Three signs are proposed on the ATM building. On the west side, a 4.12 square foot canopy sign and 8.94 square foot wail sign are proposed. On the north side, a 13.06 square foot wall sign is proposed. Staff Comments/Analysis: Conditions tend to support approval of the requested variance: • The proposed signs for the ATM building are relatively modest in size: only 13.05 square feet of signs are proposed per side. • The requested variances are minimal to identify this use, • The proposed signs will not degrade the appearance of this shopping center or the City, .. a :!+ :li. n {X:i... .. :.{ L?....St fF: }.•.m ..... ...... .. f...... .:.. ...:r ::.:: .;. ;.:%x.:. {: :.r:•. :::.....:...r.:w. :l r..w; .....,....+....:.... :. }}}:.'r.{:: •'::{•i: "e:+ . :c r. .L,rrr.. ,, i• h .: }.lr.'f.?r :... ..n, ..:.:: r:W :•.. .. ....} .. :: ..,.ri... ..{ ....{.:...... :::)":}': ?:; r '..... $: ?'::::':::: :..: .::::; ?:?.:.: : \ Jt .... 5'. F. .... r.. ... ..i ....:. .. .:, :..; .: ... .:..:.: is ::f ::i :(:•::::::;.:: i:.'. , y?'r3.4'<-;:yf'isir.'•?'-:?i:$'l?.r:•?Yv:4, :!::{: r.?:.,n. ?.+/:e }:::!':r:{'i::::'::.:•.. _.:: {•.i •i::., ;:;:.j i. Direction Existing Land Uses North Shopping center South Apartments East Restaurant and gas station West Florida Power right-of-way SV 96-18 Page 3 Applicable Variance Standards: To receive variance approval, a request must meet all four standards for approval. Based upon review and analysis of the information contained in the application, staff finds that approval of the requested variance meets all of the standards. In particular, the following standards do appear to be fully met: 1. There are special circumstances related to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions applicable to the land or buildings, and such circumstances are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to the land or buildings in the applicable zoning district. 2. The strict application of the provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or buildings. 3. The variance Is not based exclusively upon the desire for economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner. 4. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the land development code and comprehensive plan and will not be materially injurious to surrounding properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Relevant Previous Decisions by the Commission: RATIO RI?SS.:::{::..::';: NAME.:.:,.> :.:..:..::..: :.:.:. ...:... :...: .. ARIANCES`:=?`?:?`:::'.:>:..:: .Y IyllrE'TIH ' ' ' ? ?? h. ?,<...,.: . }.,» .. , v F , ,....,..<..}..: k.:.:. •...: ?..4.... >.,.... \ ...:. .. , . ...... ..... , .. ?.:::. ...::.::..... f e ::: '. :' STED/ACTIDN 'REQUE :' A 1 1~:r?>s ? .i.I. 'Y•:}{:3rn'}3 Jf. % :':..a,:: ?iY?I .:;.yrt4.:r: {.,... ;.... :,,?..r?.vY:i{.Vi.:.r.J }..:'.{::' . . . v. ?.'.• :.. ;.:... :.:.: l:. L.: .; SV 92-34 1685 Gulf to Bay Walgreens 2.9 sq. ft./1 ft. width - Denied 9128193 SV 93-69 1645 Gulf to Bay 30-Minute Coin Laundry 0.79 sq. R./1 ft. width - Approved 11/9193 SV 93-15 1407 Gulf to Bay Hugh Grant Realty and 0.83 sq. ft./1 ft, width - Approved 1119193 Builders SV 93-32 20505 U.S. 19 Poston's 1.57 sq. ft./1 ft, width - Denied 2/7194 0.72 sq. ft./1 ft, width - Approved SV 93-30 20505 U.S. 19 Gayfers 0,027 sq. ft./1 ft. width - Denied 4127194 SV 92-90 423 East Shore Olympia Motel 1.1 sq. ft./1 ft. width - Denied 4127194 SV 95-09 1520 McMullen Musicana Dinncr Thcatre 2.9 sq. 1111 R, width - Denied 3116195 Booth SV 95-20 387 Mandalay Lappert's Ice Cream 0.32 sq. ft./l ft. width - Approved 4/20195 SV 95-31 387-1/2 Mandalay Wedgwood House Estate 0.77 sq. ft./l ft. width - Approved 8117/95 Jewelers SV 95-39 24111 U.S. 19 Royal Pools 1.91 sq. 11,11 R. width - Denied 1 9121/95 SV 96-18 Page 4 ATTACHED SIGN AREA 4. CASE.?.>;<;x ,. .. ..,,. U a ... :NAMB.- + ....:.... ..:.: . 4 ;?:VARIANCE5t:.::::;.,".<;?.>::? s:?:?':<'':.;.. ::h1BN4::• SV 92-19 27001 U.S. 19 J.C. Penney Co. 329 sq. ft./Denied 10/15/92 SV 9242 714 Cleveland St. Trickcl Jewelers 70 sq. ft./Approved 219193 SV 93-73 2200 Gulf to Bay Goodyear Auto 136 sq. ft./Denied 1119193 SV 93-37 20505 U.S. 19 Burdines 1851185 sq. ft./Denicd 1124194 SV 93-96 1499 Gulf to Bay Barnett Bank 43.5149.5 sq, ft./Approved 1124/94 SV 93-106 704 Court St. Workbench 7.9 sq. A./Approved 3121194 SV 93-39 20505 U.S. 19 Dillard's 21,26 sq, ft./Approved 4119/94 SV 92-90 423 East Shore Olympia Motel 51,6 sq. ft./Denied 4127194 SV 93-65 24791 & 24826 U.S. 19 Ken Marks Ford 128 sq. ft./Approved 6116194 SV 94-26 110 Island Way Island Estates Realty 8.8 sq. ft./Approved 814194 SV 94-35 2907 S.R. 590 Johnny's Italian Restaurant 8 sq. t3./Approvcd 1113/94 SV 95-20 387 Mandalay Ave. Lappert's Ice Cream 4.8 sq. ft./Approvcd 4120195 SV 95-17 2495 Gulf to Bay Builder's Square 102.25 sq. ft./Approved 514195 SV 95-32 1801 Sunset Pt. Rd. Majik Market 28,4 sq.1t./Denied 16 sq. ft./Approvcd 7/20195 SV 93-68 25749 U.S. 19 Savings of America 37 sq. k/Approved 813195 SV 95-3I 387-112 Mandalay Ave. Wedgwood House Estate Jewelers 11.5 sq. f1dApproved 8117195 SV 95-38 1284 S. Missouri Art Warehouse 64 sq. ft./Approved 9/7/95 SV 95-39 24111 U.S. 19 Royal Pools 95.6 sq. ft./Denied 9/21/95 SV 9540 2170 Gulf to Bay Albertson's 192.3 sq. ft./Denied 81.5 sq. ft./Approved 1015195 SV 9542 2530 McMullen Booth Northwood Plaza and Republic Bank 12.5 sq. ft./Approved 10/19/95 SV 96-05 1501 N. Bclcltcr Long Center 83,3 sq.13./Approvcd 3/7196 SV 96-06 400 Mandalay Doubleiree Resort Surfside 155 sq. ft./Approved 3121/96 SV 96-15 600 Bypass Drive Cleanvater Professional Center 34 sq. ft./Approvcd 811196 SV %-12 3130 Gulf to Bay Speedway 62,5 sq. ft./Denicd 8/15/96 SV 96-16 1499 Gulf to Bay The Technology Team 66.66 sq. ft./Approved 915196 SV 9fi-18 Page 5 VARIANCE WORKSHEET - CASE NUMBER SV 96-18 STANDARDS FOR VARIANCE STAFF FINDINGS APPROVAL (1) There are special circumstances Conditions tend to support approval of the related to the particular physical requested variance: surroundings, shape or topographical ' The proposed signs for the ATM building conditions applicable to the land or are relatively modest in size: only 13.05 buildings, and such circumstances are square feet of signs are proposed per side. peculiar to such land or buildings and • The requested variances are minimal to do not apply generally to the land or identify this use. buildings in the applicable zoning ' The proposed signs will not degrade the district. appearance of this shopping center or the city. (2) The strict application of the The purpose of the variance is the identify provisions of the code would deprive the ATM building. The variances are minimal the applicant of the reasonable use of to accomplish that purpose. the land or buildings. (3) The variance is not based The variance request appears to satisfy this exclusively upon the desire for condition. economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner. (4) The granting of the variance will be The sign regulations were adopted with the in harmony with the general purpose intent of enhancing the visual quality of the and intent of the land development City's streets and landscape in order to code and comprehensive plan and will protect the value of properties and the well- not be materially injurious to being of the local tourist oriented economy. surrounding properties or otherwise The granting of this variance appears to be detrimental to the public welfare. consistent with this intent. CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT 10 S. MISSOURI AVENUE CLEARWATER, EL 34616 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION s=%- PR OPERTY OWNER(S) NAME & ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE(S) (if any) NAME & ADDRESS: ABS Properties Campus Walk Plaza 2551 Drew Street erwater, FL ?4625 Gene Maxon Associates, Inc. Campus Walk Plaza 2551 Drew Street, Suite 206 Clearwater, FL - 346Z5 TELEPHONE: (813 1 797-1.784 TELEPHONE: (8131 726-0775 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:__ 2571 Drew Street, Clearwater, Florida NAME OF BUSINESS (IF APPLICABLE): Pinellas County Teachers Credit Union Shopping Ctr. Site - 310,532 S.F. ZONING DISTRICT: CH LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: R/O/R LAGMAREA'te - 1,083 S. F. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Lot 2-A, Campus Walk Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Pat ook 95, age 6 o the u- i61 c Records-off vineiias t ounty, rioriaa PARCEL NUMBER: 18 / 29 / 16 / 13141 / 000 / 0210 (This information is available from your tax receipt or contact Pinellas Co. Property Appraiser's Office at 464-3207. If more than one parcel number, attach 8 % x 11 inch sheet) DESCRIBE SURROUNDING USES OF PROPERTY: North:Shopping- Center- - Commercial South: Residential Apts. ?E Commercial - Hotel East: Shopping_ Center - Commercial West: Community Collega - Institutional VARIANCE(S) REQUEST: .. e+d 1-'- 02- _ 2lo • 1 `\ I-- A mr'+ ee. o{= Pi,g 5.,uf eel- to 411aw -5-9- 5ouart -Feat ct o lPded J?Z 4r' Ge QV 0, 37 S UAre QeT FLe r Foot 0 ? i ldi c i _ G a a s f qn oro-a rq U57 s ogre +e-et Per ,oa i dr >7A CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL: A variance shell not be granted by the City Commission unless the application and evidence presented clearly support the following conclusions; 11 There are special circumstances related to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions applicable to tha land or buildings, and such circumstancss are peculiar to such land or bulldings and do not apply generally to the land or buldings In the applicable zoning district because Declaratory Ruling 93-5 which treats the ATM as an extension of the primary bank building may be fine for a typical bank. When "primer building" consists of narrow strip-mall frontage, Is unlike) that there will be any unused signage allocation. This is a unique case of a storefront an with a remote e alone can o ge ra . 2) The strict applketion of the rovislons of the code would deprive the applicant of the reasoneblo use of th land or buRdings because t TM "building" with only a 121-8" frontage cannot generate sutfrclent signage to compete with typical ATMs which can use unused s gnage allocations from larger free-standing banks some wit double frontage). 31 The variance Is not based exclusively upon a desire for economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner because there are other concerns of visibility, graphic consistency. 41 The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and Intent of the land development code and comprehensive plan and will not be materially Injurious to surrounding properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare becausethe-intent-of-D-eclaratorv Rullna 93-5 recognizes the inability of small ATM structures to generate adequate si na a based on frontage,- but has no, provisions for the unique situation (strip-mall bank) described above. The graphics, furt ermore, are uncommonly tasteful, understated and will mate other installations t roug out Pinellas County. , - THIS SUBMISSION GIVES AN APPLICANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST THE VARIANCE AND APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION AT A PUBLIC HEARING. FEES PAID ARE NON-REFUNDABLE REGARDLESS OF BOARD ACTION. BY SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT 1 AM ACKNOWLEDGING THAT ALL FEES PAID DO NOT GUARANTEE APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. ABS Properties SIGNATURE OF PROM" OWNER (OR REPRESENTA E ene Maxon, Representative (see attached letter) Sworn a1d subscribed baTarm me this I "? day of K [y u S r'- _'_ A.D., 19 JP by , who Is personally known to me andlor vs-praduucad "-IdeetWQatkmv. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF Notary Notary typed, printed or stamped) A Commission No, f A AYSA SUZANNE R FRO'SSARD INOTARY PUBLIC STAlT OF FIARIDA COMMISSION NO. CC349013 MY COMMISSION EXP. MAR. 5,1943 NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST ATTEND HEARING. 13 August 1996 To: The City of Clearwater, Commissioners and Mayor Planning and Zoning Department Building Department City Hail From: Robert E. Alpaugh, General Partner ABS Properties Campus Walk Plaza 2551 Drew St., Clearwater Re: Pinellas County Teacher's Credit Union ATM site, Campus Walk Plaza The attached plan of Campus Walk Plaza at 2551 Drew Street shows the location where the partners, myself Included, will permit the Pinellas County Teacher's Credit Union to place and operate an ATM facility. The facility Is to be installed In compliance with all appropriate building codes; and Is to be maintained In a neat and clean condition during the term of the credit unlon's lease at Campus Walk Plaza. The partnership also appoints Mr. Gene Maxon to represent us In the Pinellas County Teacher's Credit Union application for a signage variance to permit the sign as shown on the attached schematic of the ATM to be installed. If the City has any questions, they may direct a call to Mr. Maxon, our property manager, at 726-0775, who will discuss any pertinent item with the City. Thank you. signed/ go5ert . Alpafgtf, General Partner Witness: Print Name: s Notary: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this L ay of August 1996 by Robert E. Alpaugh who Is personally known to me and who does have authority to a ec a document on behalf of ABS Properties, a Florida general partnership. L-:;?_,Olau (Seal) Notary Signature OFFICIAL NOTARY ROBBIE A MLCH NC ' Y PUBLIC STATE OF Ll', roh•.'h:5S10N NO. M,%., !.,'f _a 41,;I5EION EXPIA11 ?. is w H W U Z a. Q. o. ¦ O 3 C l) M 'a V S t ?IMITHT11 ? - «.-/.. wow 11/111 I . • ?•l I fI 11 . I I1 11A?1 - E' v l U 1 1 1 1 - ? ? ,J _L11111_ _ U-IfTrfT1TI D] I i I I 11-1-9 ?r DIIIIII11?0 L LLLLLI E R .... ..... I Tr TW {.J Gll•1??IIIII?? - ?? M ` j ? = a 0 ?ll'l?i-ITI'I1?ITi-(?ITI 1 I I I? I I I I I I-I -.. ---. Sidost3fadst mSt!W im?ia 1114 T 43 grgwar, N- I K 59?A51, 1 E. 9- avow "Y"lloY0h CM11T11TT "A" TENAN'T' ?t ? ASR ? t a r '? } LU 7 ? Qe N it 7 1 4?j Jt1[i1S tJ _ ?Itll l L.Ifrr•.. iWft 1• M h !! h A • G r w w j A u 3 4 f r • 4 • y Y n M .F ? r if u Q y M ? ? • Y A r f f r n • ? a' rt n ? 4 w w r g s ? rl : ? N 1I I7 h f • t c G Li c U x F x I C l ? LANDLUJID i ' i J t I C c*u "Ty) PLANE ..,...,,.1...,,.. 40"m 4fto "now ' i ? r y r ?+?.? r ?wr+? ? ?r+. i.. war r r ?r..rw ?. w+w.M ? I; 11H I r CLEARANCE INDICATOR - SEE SktTCH SK-18 (OPTIONAL) . 1 ¦ ¦ \% I!- -- OTTER PLANTS (OPTIONAL) 4-00 ? 108' i f 1. 71 j, fr? f 1 N 1 ? 1 f -V 1 F. 25b 4 It 19' P1.5 PROJECT SM.N 4t NORTH SCALE I' - 20' PINELLAS COUNTY V TEACHERS' CREDIT UNION f f PROPOSED A.T.M. J ' f SUPPLEMENTAL SK1:-:-F GI-1 SK-lA I?irl?ll?s Cc?at.inty Tcza c-- I-, mars Cre.clit Ur-vIC> PROJECT NO. 96-22 AUGUST 15,1996' ALEXANDER E ASSOSIATES CHARTERED ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS 309 Belleview Boulevard, Bellealt-, Florida 311616 . d DREW STREET LL. d t to i • N b . n t I w N ?k W U A ? w F--r = 7 H W 2 U ? W J . Z 0 W F--i Q o Q U k W 11 Q _ 00 LY Z M W © Z _ z A W J Q x ¢ w d A p? W U ?- F-- LY_ -J .p-.B 2 Q U W Q F-- w J N Z Q 0i z ZD _ o u? a 9 Q QU n ?+ > J I L) U Lij 1(1? J ;z .-- ? k j © W H 1-- C Q Y C^ / / l? kL i? „l -,Z " ,1 l -, l t to N r n 0 /'. A 0 `-' U W 0 z W H d CD d U W • '-' fn -1 W II Q ` 2 00 Z M W ? © Z A W d W d U J A d W w u ]- H - H CL - W U T d LL' W r F - J ?-- d 0i 0.1 W ~ ? V) CL O Z O U dU J I q ? U W W --I LLJ rZ-+ i-- 1 O LLJ a- <Z 0 CL d W PINELLAS COUNTY TEACHERS CREDIT UNION ATM - CAMPUS WALK FACILITY 96-22 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION SIGNAGE COMPUTATIONS August 16, 1996 (Revised August 30, 1996) Drew Street frontage of primary building is 25 feet. The original signage area available was 37.5 sq.ft. (25 x 1.5). This signage installed Is as follows: Marquee Sign .................................. 32.88 sq.ft. Incidental Sign (Honor, Cirrus, etc.) ..................... 1.38 sq.ft. Logo and Text on Entry Door ..................... - p,53 sg.ft. TOTAL EXISTING SIGNAGE ......................... 33.41 sq.ft. The difference between the allowable signage and the existing signage area used is 4.09 sq.ft. which we propose to allocate to the north, south and west elevations of ,the new ATM on a proportionate basis, i.e. 4.09 -?- 3 = 1.36 sq.ft. for each of three signs. The proposed ATM building measures 7'-0" on each of four sides. We calculate the allowable signage on each of the four sides to be 11.86 sq.ft. (7 x 1.5 + 1.36) . This variance request and increase in the allowable signage area by 1.2 sq.ft. which represents a 1019/6 increase in the signage area. The proposed signage per elevation, if approved by the City of Clearwater would be as follows: Elevation (Side) West (front elevation) North (right elevation) South (left elevation) East (rear elevation) TOTAL Allowable Signage 11.86 sq.ft. 11.86 sq.ft. 11.86 sq.ft. 4.00 sq.ft. 35.58 sq.ft. Proposed Signage 13.06 sq.ft. 13.06 sq.ft. 13.06 sq.ft. 0.00 sq.ft. 39.18 sq.ft. RECEIVED ? 5 1JJf? DECLARATORY" R.ULIN AUG ? 93--5 January 1, 1993 ISGU Et ATM machine signage. RULIRGs Pending a code amendment, ATM machine signage will be treated as though the ATM was an extension of the' primary bank building. The ATM machine would be allowed to share in the attached signage allocation available to the maim building; e.g., if the main building was eligible for 48 1. €t. of attached signage, the ATM could receive all or ac any part of that signage. consistent with the limitations on the number of attached signs. ATM's are eligible for incidental signs and may have menu signs installed on the face of the machine that is accessed by the customer. ATMs are also eligible to share in the signage allocated to the main building under the 'not primarily viewable from a street right-of-way but assodiated with a business entrance') signage, so long as such signage is placed on the side(s) of the ATM not primarily viewable from a street right--of-way. l mes M? Polatty, Jr. rec of Planning apd Development 1 61 co t a/ Scott Shuford, Pla n Development Code Aft ng Manager and nistrator Joh -Richter, Code Enforcement Manager and Deputy Development Code Administrator r J I ?rrlur ? 107-25 I I rxN rrlN !?fY ps?e r r O r.« I pur ,I 33/04 I E ran ??ti N/02 Jf 4 I on S cH 1eo 100 I 33/06 R I ? 33/07 DREW STRFZr qq a 33d ? titi/?ot r-- _J CAMPUS WALK 0 2A 95-88 20 i I 1p1 r o I 9 r . o it/os j I ? 12/01 I ? ? l of rr 11/05 ioo- +oT ??s-pis r _ . I r fu-«4 CAM13RIDGE AP LOT 1 N/13 xJ ansr ' y P «? nn.? 11 /12 ..t3::>i.:.} . .:f::;, •:?.:.:<-:: SIIriN 'REQUEST I T-UNIQLV NAME: A8S PROPERTI S / _,MIAS COUII1Ty_F A 0ERS_RED SV # D--.I PUBLIC NEARING DATE : OCTOBER 3, 1996 ATLAS PAGE: 2908 SEC: 1$ TWP: 2L9 S RGE: 15 E t' ER CITY COMMISSION CLEARWAY >`' . MM .. .... ? 1 at rs ? 1 r o m w ...?....? rw .rirr ?f 'Oii w1CO4 Kyrvwn r}?+r?{? ••••••? r W I ? +i 1 ss YT A r wrnW" a sn III YUQ17f Cwl ? I"?} 4Y r7WU0 'O 71?d7 -Qy fJFOLf rr? r, y il 7f "15 V Y SI t?i1?i '?- ?'? -l^_ w'Or? ]w7771 -6Y JMJIII • ? 1m 1M1Y YT>ttl1Y. 75Y CMYIOh "]SY -.-t- 6llr'AOti g f' ']rY yya raw iYr.?oN S>Ma ? b 4 ^ M 1 -.my )l.nYrtin - 2wY1 ALLY ?yYr idle 'JAY SY"Oem 11Y piAMIn - fl T7! 17Y O . g RR 1tY ?Wau4)W O , fN N y1Y 711tuh AI ?q 1? 0 ' ]KY ?OS jY?tw pu»,x+ 'w o QI C . I x ?II NAY ? 00 '.JAY AY1Y0r"M a LL._ Item N• Is • Clearwater City Commission . iat Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: SUBJECT: Variance to the Sign Regulations; 300 Cleveland St.; City of Clearwater/Harborview Center (Owner/Applicant); Barry Strafacci (Representative). (SV 96-19) RECOMMENDATIONNOTION: Approve the following variances: (1) a variance to allow a freestanding sign 128 square feet in area, 20 feet high, and set back 5 feet from the street right-of-way, in a zoning district where freestanding signs are not permitted, and (2) a variance to allow three message changes per hour on an electronic reader board sign in lieu of the permitted one change per 24 hours, on property identified as Rompon's and Baskin's Corrected Map of Causeway Business District, Blocks 1, 3, 4 and 5, together with Edward Mill's Sub., Lots 3, 4 and 5, for meeting Sec. 45.24, Standards for Approval, Items (1)-(4), subject to the following condition: The sign faces shall be positioned at an angle no greater than 90 degrees to each other, © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: N. k • This property is located on the northwest corner of Cleveland St. and N. Osceola Ave., and is in the Urban Center (Bayfront) zoning district. • The City is requesting the following variances: (1) a variance to allow a freestanding sign 128 square feet in area, 20 feet high, and set back 5 feet from the street right-of-way, in a zoning district where freestanding signs are not permitted, and (2) a variance to allow three message changes per hour on an electronic reader board sign in lieu of the permitted one change per 24 hours. • This property is developed with a mixed use building, including a convention center. • The City proposes to construct an electronic reader board sign at the intersection of Pierce Blvd., Cleveland St., and Memorial Causeway. The sign will be used primarily to promote upcoming events at this facility. Additionally, the sign will be used to promote other public events. • The sign faces will be touching along one end and will be positioned at an angle of approximately 90 degrees to each other. Reviewed by: originsting Department: Costs: Commission Action: r Leant 's< NIA : `.""' t:entral.perniitting NIA ? Approved Budget Total ? Approved w/Conditions Purchasing f ?? N1A`:: ;.` User Depaff1 rt ent: ? Denied Risk Mgmt. $ ^ `rt1A =%? ? Contral,?etm %I no.,., Current Fiscal Year ? Continued to: Is Funding Source: AGM .'•`4w' `':f::: ? Capital lmprovunant: CRT Advertised: ? oparating: peter :. ° ? Attachments: C arbor: Application.:..; Submitted ? Not Required Appropriation Code Application Worksheat by: Affected Parties: Maps ® Notified ? None C a gar ? Not Required 0 Printed on recycled paper SV 96-19 Page 2 The following table provides summary information regarding the proposed sign: i . / r ' .. r.w .. >x <.. lrt Y ation:<;°: - :: P o sed°. r o Permitted: Type of sign Freestanding No Location/orientation of sign Intersection of Memorial No freestanding signs Causeway, Drew St., permitted In this zone Cleveland St., and Pierce Blvd. Area 128 sq. ft. No freestanding signs permitted in this zone Height 20 ft. No freestanding signs permitted in this zone Setback 5 ft. No freestanding signs permitted in this zone Frequency of message changes Maximum 3 changes every Maximum 1 change every hour 24 hours Staff Comments/Analysis: Conditions tend to support approval of the requested variances: • The convention center is a unique land use in the City. Furthermore, it is a downtown anchor. • Attainment of the city's economic goals for downtown will be buoyed by the popularity and success of the convention center. It is necessary to adequately promote the events at this facility to ensure its success. This sign will help realize that objective. • A code amendment is in draft form to allow a freestanding sign on properties over one acre in size in this zone, The amendment proposes to allow a 64 square foot, 20 foot high sign. Also, a code amendment will be proposed which increases the frequency of allowable message changes on signs. The number of changes permitted will be largely guided by the Commission's disposition on this variance request. • The 90 degree angle of the sign faces will, to some extent, lessen the impact of the requested 128 square foot sign area. 4 SV 96-19 Page 3 ?r ^!ts yry4z?Y3"„Si: i..l :,S?;;'t?... `•'.%e.3:. ::s{ ? ( }' ?:"rv'• i. is :. .?:...???.?''• .f:::?. i.•: :SURROUNDING LAND USES.: Direction Existing Land Uses North Park, library South Church East Bank West Clearwater Harbor Applicable Variance Standards: To receive variance approval, a request must meet all four standards for approval. Based upon review and analysis of the Information contained in the application, staff finds that approval of the requested variance meets all of the standards. In particular, the following standards do appear to be fully met: 1. There are special circumstances related to the particular physical surroundings,, shape or topographical conditions applicable to the land or buildings, and such circumstances are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to the land or buildings in the applicable zoning district. 2. The strict application of the provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or buildings. 3. The variance is not based exclusively upon the desire for economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner. 4. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the land development code and comprehensive plan and will not be materially injurious to surrounding properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Relevant Previous Decisions by the Commission: There have been no variances requested regarding the permitted frequency of message changes. There have been no variances requested for freestanding signs in the Urban Center (Bayfront) District. The table on the following page, however, identifies variances for freestanding signs in the Urban Center (Core) District. SV 96-19 Page 4 FREESTANDING SIGNS IN THE URBAN CENTER (CORE) DISTRICT ., .. ..,.....r.:: ry. {f//???la . , hF£?,.,,. , 'a , •:: strcr . ., :. .. .r:.:: :. .SY, ;. • .:. ..NAME:' ? VARiANCES.':.::? ::.:?:?::.<::.?';;,:r:?" .? ?:: y rr •f, h s ? ,, v.. .' :,,? :.,, ,..., .¢y,. .. ?? ,•??..:?s.,. . ? £.4 gizw•.>:CK';l :=:.: r. ;.: i.;. ...::,- ..:::... i ?r:;?>< ?:> : Z ...,. .:? :.'•'':'..i- ..: .:., ,: .:..:.: ..";:::; . :Ri~QUESTI~DIAC ION,':; '.;S'???':`y:,?{i?. . . .. . . . . . . SV 92-18 706 Drew St. Seven Oaks BP 2 freestanding signs/Approved 1124194 SV 93-97 305S. Pinellas County 1 freestanding sign/Approved 3121194 Osceola SV 93-100 121 N. Ft. Caryl's Natural Foods & Juice 2 freestanding signs/Approved 3121194 Harrison Bar SV 93-102 624 Court St. American Red Cross 1 freestanding sign/Approved 3121194 SV 93-107 606 Chestnut Fortune Savings Bank 2 freestanding signs/Approved 3121194 SV 93-112 619 Chestnut Pontrello Law Office 1 freestanding sign/Approved 3/21/94 SV 94-11 415 S: Ft. Gruver's Chevron 1 freestanding sign/Approved 4/19/94 Harrison SV 94-27 108 N. Myrtle Devoe and Raynolds Co. 1 freestanding sign/Approved 8/4194 SV 94-17 420 Bay Ave. Oaks of Clearwater 1 freestanding sign/Approved 9115/94 SV 95-13 110 S. Ft. Peace Memorial Church 1 freestanding sign/Approved 3/2/95 Harrison . SV 96-19 Page 5 VARIANCE WORKSHEET - CASE NUMBER SV 96-19 STANDARDS FOR VARIANCE STAFF FINDINGS APPROVAL (1) There are special circumstances Conditions tend to support approval of the related to the particular physical requested variances: surroundings, shape or topographical The convention center is a unique land use conditions applicable to the land or in the City. Furthermore, It is a downtown buildings, and such circumstances are anchor. peculiar to such land or buildings and ' Attainment of the city's economic goals for do not apply generally to the land or downtown will be buoyed by the popularity buildings in the applicable zoning and success of the convention center. district. • It is necessary to adequately promote the events at this facility to ensure its success. This sign will help realize that objective. • A code amendment is in draft form to allow a freestanding sign on properties over one acre in size in this zone. The amendment proposes to allow a 64 square foot, 20 foot high sign. Also, a code amendment will be proposed which increases the frequency of message changes on signs. • The 90 degree angle of the sign faces will, to some extent, lessen the impact of the requested 128 square foot sign area. (2) The strict application of the The proposed sign constitutes a reasonable provisions of the code would deprive use for the reasons stated above. the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or buildings. (3) The variance is not based The variances requested appear to satisfy exclusively upon the desire for this condition. economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner. (4) The granting of the variance will be The sign regulations were adopted with the in harmony with the general purpose intent of enhancing the visual quality of the and intent of the land development City's streets and landscape in order to code and comprehensive plan and will protect the value of properties and the well- not be materially injurious to being of the local tourist oriented economy. surrounding properties or otherwise The granting of these variances appears to be detrimental to the public welfare. consistent with this intent. ~ CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT 100 SO. MYRTLE AVE., 2rrn FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 34616 PHONE: 5624567; FAX; 51624576 INSPECTION LINE: 5624580 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION SV# 6'1'6-14 PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME & ADDRESS: R13PRESENTA'1'IVES(S) (if any) NAME & ADDRESS: Bar Strafacei Globe Facility Services Sit of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater FL 34618-4748 TELEPHONE: (813) 462.6778 TELEPHONE: (813 } 462.6778 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 300 Cleveland Street NAME OF BUSINESS (IF APPLICABLE): Harborview Center ZONING DISTRICT: UC(B) LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:, CBD LAND AREA: 7.8 Acres M.D.L. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPER'T`Y: Rompon's and Baskin's Corrected Map of Causeway Business District, Block 1, 3, 4, and 5; Together with Edward Mill's Sub., Lots 3, 4, and 6. VARCEL NUM13ER: 16 1 29 1 15 1 76482 1 001 1 0000 i' 1'his information is available from your tax receipt or contact Pinellas Co. Property Appraiser's Office at 464.3207. If more than one parcel number, attach 8'h x 11 inch sheet. DESCRIBE SURROUNDING USES OF PROPERTY North: Coachman Park, Clearwater Public Library East: Bank South: Calvary Baptist Church West: Clearwater Harbor VARIANCE(S) REQUEST: 1. Avariance to permit a 128 sq. ft. freestanding sign, 20 ft. in height, and setback a minimum of 5 ft, from all property lines in a zoning district which does not permit such signs. Sign will advise public of upcoming events at the Harborview Center and will also include messages related to events scheduled at Coachman Park. 2. A variance to permit an animated sign not allowed by code, Electronic reader board will change messages no more rapidly than 3 times per hour. CONTINUED ON REV1311SE SIDE STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL: A variance shall not be granted by the Development Code Adjustment Board unless the application and evidence presented clearly support the following conditions: 1) There are special circumstances related to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions applicable to the land or buildings, and such circumstances are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to the land or buildings in the applicable zoning district because: 'Me Harborvicay Canter l in r l u t _p mote u1?r?min?c?}?ents tQ the motorine "blic in a-manner-consistent with similar f ili i s in other cities, 2) The strict application of the provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or buildings because: posp n' ui lin t i is u u i i The HarhQryiew--Cmter is a ul i• u comDete u facilities which ' i r i 3) The variance is not based exclusively upon a desire for economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner because: rl and f 1 (JirgQL h u h 1 H r i 4) The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan and will not be materially injurious to surrounding properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare because: 31e sigm iwill mee t the ge nera l puu )ose n int ent fthe L and Duc loom ont. c ode, Tai ini r li r id enti C ca tim of ac viti ti es hi oc cur on hi. 1 )rgpe rty. ill b e igu vQrly sized, s etb ack and limped, a nd w ill _aide in s afely direc tin g the 12ti blic ont o (110 orgn erty . THIS SUBMISSION GIVES AN APPLICANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST THE VARIANCE AND APPEAR BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD. FEES PAID ARE NON- REFUNDABLE REGARDLESS OF BOARD ACTION. BY SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT I AM ACKNOWLEDGING THAT ALL FEES PAID DO NOT GUARANTEE APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER (OR RESPRESENT rIVE)'-- (Include positi and nam f company if applicable) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 10th----- day of A.D., 19 96 by Barr 3 Stl:afacci , who is personally know to me or has produced as identification. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OI: _ p7?tF11_ S_ Commission: Notary Public ?V,e ?+,?. A tA=t.PAWDSLIL .* ? ?c«M+r.+onuceoooos Name of Notary typed, printed or stamped 0 as tti? NOTES: PROPSII`t'Y OWNER OR REPRESENTATIVE NIUS'I` X17END HE-AILING. APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A CURRENTANI)LACCURATI SLCF?A_N. FORM • SIGNS VARIANCE (SopLotnhor 10, 1096)1410.OD03 03/15/96 FRI 0903 FAX 60S 007 4700 DAK'TRONICS 3' -d' 4, -S« l?J 002 1 z'-1 ti" 4'-2" lj'-Dr S•i?dt>"•.'•.,'.:'}kt'+r'..''isP:.'?:'-??,'. :. '?' ??.:,,.; s'.`i?.f L;? 41?(•. .. ia`iS` "?•rkrrr 4` iri I rr,iir ¦irrr'? 1; ?3 r r•".ww,! wa'. i?rr"'i r'' y,worr?Arrr.I'::rrl-iZ???.r,. .. Zr r..w•fwawr¦?.??r• 1' :. rw r '• ..ra, i??;? ''ii ?r? wr 4'=:'.Yr .Ya ¦w ??. rw. as .r:?:r¦rr:'. °r•+ .-.,`.'r r•.w ??r...r?r.?w rr' •.w°i. .. "a i,.r .,'„x. ;rw r'u; wt ;ii ii aiiaQr? wwr Hr:+r rr rr. il:', Ii= ?? •wgrw.•.rr..... rrrNr rw r?r ^?r?r?,.?w?rrM, si.r.??rti?'?¢yr ,.f,?,r?:.:?,:. ??tr w. - •.rr.??r,'?ts rr.•. rriti¦ ar`'¦¦.;,?... , s. rrwr' Ir ? i='II..i •rrr • rr Y,`rrrrrr - a:. v?,I'r ?i .''.••..Y S'Yr.. r/ 1!? rlf' r.'It• rw?i" ...bpi •rr.^?iaa a(.:trr.. !rw. ?= .,: F",...;'?'. = • ..}Ir.irafr:.?r4w •? F - ?'` i?.. 7r •'.. rfa r . f •' • '. ,' ' • : wr ?raww? •ar?'•• - wir , ?? rr '? *??=M =ry rr . r'. ,. zaw'i rr.?? : Y•• .-. rr., •i: "rw°y '?r;. °.n?s`ti. 'wir•,wi? li?i?Zr Yr:1' :??M$?r':a.i :'L•'. ! ii:•.9: r):; Y,?lr .+r. •`i,?t+'.• et ?!'fj?; s'i?l .fir".': ' 1.rt;` i.+'. :i k., ?? L3rI7 ;•,.'. TOP VIEW NOT TO SCALE SPECIRCATIONS: IUENTIFICAT1Qjl dl,AP LAY: LETTERS ARE 1--'7.75" HIGH, BURGUNDY VINYL "W9830VE-S" 49 OPbWAVE IS LIGHT TEAL. MIDDLE WAVE IS MEDIUM TEAL BOTTCM WAVE IS DEEP TEAL DISPLAY FACE IS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED " 121SP - 32xB4 LAMP MATRIX - LAMPS ARE ON 1.5' CENTERS -- LAMPS ARE COVERED BY CLEAR LENS PRISMS -- 4 LINES OF 10 (10r) CHARACTERS PER LINE - 'VENUSe SERIES' CONTROLLER GENERAL OISPI - 2--V FACE - ALL ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION -DISPLAY FINISH IS AAKTRONICS STANDARD TAN DIMENSIONS ARE SUOJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO DETAILED DESIGN CONSIDERATIONVONLY APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS SHOULD BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION! PURPOSES MUST BE EARTH GROUNDEDAUMBER & LENGTHS OF RODS TO MEET LOCAL NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE ESMAMD_POWER _ DEMAND: - IDENTIFICATION DISPLAY: 760 WATTS - ' SUNSPOT4" DISPLAY: 21,300 WATTS - TOTAL SYSTEM: 22,068 WATTS CSUNSPOTW PCWER IS CALCULATCO AT 5.20 WATTS PER POINT) O COPYFUCHI 1994 WMIGNICS, ANC 3 D3-1i-98 1 ""-IX FR.. A 3e-louoG o ?: y410 s?acfuvn.st. OCSK OAKTRONICS, ING OROOKINGS. SO 53006 ° vR0,1: HARBOR VIEW CENTER CLEARWATER €'L 2 01-29-98 :%& " m w ds+. AA0 N T[S OoK ,nu: 3264- T OMIOC I t 1,?-;v-fis C"MGM WaIx F-0 A +.111-+ TO 20-+p+ Nvwro SPON"e, TO neK acar !Th D?urry K DOK DATL.03-1 s-05 M+C Po". Ws 70 8 J P O 8 A- 6$ 9 4 4 ,l(H, paq ' L 03/15/96 10: 34 'FX/RX NO.2112 1'. 002 ?b 3 'q Q ti oolm Y ?? m Z O 4 3a ccy ?z CL) N a c a G _f d h D cc O LL G LU cr- W v - z L11 IL ? cn o U ?o w?w? > a.- ?A? O? wa m 0o =.Co Qs r ' j1• 3 .. i I' ?' 1 , ??,? ?1 ?'.L[rl Iri?`tJ i 1'. T) ,1 , 1? 1' iF 1 1 t try '+,• , ?4 ??• ;'}1.f? : 4 t, 'tr ''?{? •? , r ' Z'=l, _ ,'? Vii' 1 7 . . .r ail + i + a? i •`ir'I 4 S. L 1 { i7! ti ''a ' [ ,f ? ' '[ / ?,?. • ? / S : tit •?I f •.?..1+11? •r•, .t4 ?• ?t 1,f'rt? tr Sol ir V. Ll + 't ` '1V ` I I 1 ? ,., ?. --- X35-? BELVEDCRE APTS t J O P C O W I p t tt4- 1 -7 - 2 -- A AV 1 tt $c ? i YL?E!( ,n 16 Q -- -- .. 43/01 - , 2 4 ,oe xa- , 2 a ?, 21 ail v ,rr m..u! . 12/6!1 O 12?b?' ~ 4 tig ? • ?7,,2f r ?? 1Nt-214 ?? ? .. . 1 C6KTY/M ?11K J - ? JIKMRD k UWDY7tR 4-10 347 02 12/011 . . 12/x3 W .,. UMET O 12/62 !Ol 48% 223y - 47! 1 w r? • COACHMAN PA S 21 20 14 18 JI- w,? , j ' 17 1S • T 2 ll? ? w Rfi l1 -3! 24-1! 421- 4? ? ?A s1R?'r ? ?.. r2 SAYFRONT SHOPP NG CEN 3 t' w I „ ROMPON'9 & BASMS A : 2 79sa-?oa 7 8 9 1.0 11 a E 57--1 u s 4 s ' 1 a • • t ? b i BAYFRONT 'iENNI 1 t '0 1 i1 COMPLEX 51 4. 3 2 , ? 2 12 0 4 u ? / 9 x Q DAYEY „ 3 0020 • t Pat I uc( CITY HALL t - 4 12 HI ` 57 2 2 1a ?+ 3 O 03 U C (B) 1 K 3 14 nr 13 17 16 4 I a !°1 24/01- KRCE SIMV 2 9 5 14/02 13/06 tao PIE ..... it /no; 13/07 I ` y I SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST NAME: /a F ?EARWATER HARB RVIEW ENTER TRAFA Cl sv # • OA2 PUBLIC HEARING DATE : OCTOBER 3, 1996 ATLAS PAGE: GCB SEC: j& TWP: 22 S RGE: 11? E CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION a e r ? ^ m tri Matra •C4 woo4 kTnwm ••- •-•-?-?• J OWN" it Wn Nr?ogrw 4- = -0-- 4:L ar n?u. ow vu MIN A r 'JAY t3'roin t ,, ? ? ? r Jr ------?-w a sang •or rangy O 2wn 'SAY vcmuv/ 'y,Y aNybom own*" no, xim 'ylY Yplnrtllrl kfr'1 All7? w ? 7Hr1 ? ?? ?? y.n ib ?r tronv0 ? ?nr rrotsr? Q ? 74r ?COOVQp4 D _ M ?1Y Yltyth O rr =? Y? ? , ? ?r ?Rx?rr •u .. b a ?II ski if `41 I .f ? ? d?J ? A 1 ?r trneMra "Vve r i t Interoffice Correspondence Sheet To: Betty Deptula, City Manager From: Scott Shuford, Director of Central Permitting Subject: Harborview Center Sign Variance's I V E D CC: Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk O'T. 01 1996 Don McCarty, Senior Planner "IT Y t'LERK DEPT Date: October 1, 1995 M indicated at the Commission worksession, the City Design Review Board approved the location and overall design of the Harborview Center freestanding sign. Draft minutes of the meeting are attached. • S Please forward this information to the City Commission, Let me know if there are questions or comments, S. i C? . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF CLEARWATER September 24, 1996 Present: William McCann Kathy Milam Robert Herberich Mario Cagni Alex Flisko Howard Hamilton Leslie Dougall-Sides Don McCarty Gwen Legters Absent: MacArthur "Mac" Boykins DRAFT Chair Vice Chair Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Assistant City Attorney Design Planner Board Reporter Board Member To provide continuity for research, the Items are listed In agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. The meeting was called to order by the Chair at 3:00 p.m. in City Hall. Minutes Approval - August 13, 1996 Member Pilsko moved to approve the minutes according to copies submitted in writing to each member by the Board Reporter. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. C. Lobbyist Registration Ordinance -- Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides The following is an unapproved excerpt of the DRB minutes for September 24, 1996. D. Proposals for Design Review 1. DRB 96-009 -- Harborview Center Marquee, City of Clearwater 300 Cleveland Street (continued from August 13, 19961 Mr. McCarty presented background information and staff recommendations. He referred to handouts submitted at the previous meeting, representing the conceptual appearance, landscaping, and physical specifications of the proposed sign. It was indicated the marques design will remain the same, but the proposed location has been moved to the landscaped area adjacent to the southwest corner of the parking lot within the Harborview Center property lines. A new colored drawing was submitted to show proposed placement of the sign and associated landscaping in the new location. Barry Strafacci, Harborview Center General Manager with Globe Facilities Services, responded to questions. He stated the sign Is computerized, can display the time and mdrb098.90 1 09/24/96 A-e- -_ I'D DRAFT temperature, and has animation: capabilities In four colors, Harborview Center events, as well as Parks and Recreation and Memorial Civic Center activities will be announced and publicized on the sign, Mr. McCarty briefly outlined the proposed farmer location and associated board concerns expressed at the last meeting. He said he met with the Central Permitting and Engineering directors, to look at the feasibility of a number of different sites. T he site will be thoroughly landscaped and several palm trees will be relocated to accommodate the sign. Staff recommends this location on the Harborview Center property, and supports a marquee to advertise coming events. Mr. Strafacci responded to questions, stating the size will be approximately 5 by 12 feet per side. He said, if money were no object, he would choose a much larger sign in a more prominent place for optimum marketing value and maximum exposure. The current sign sizs was a good compromise, developed to meet code In a variety of different locations. He said he worked with Daktronics, Inc, to create a design that looks goad and goes along with the waterfront theme. He stated the height is not as essential as it would be if located on top of the building or along the highway. He noted the current location was the original choice, but technical design people had advocated putting the sign in the street for maximum coverage. He sold a concrete traffic light support column reduces visibility of traffic coming from the beach, but once at the stop light, motorists have total visibility of the sign. One member expressed concern with the aesthetic appearance of the sign, noting the City will have to live with it for a long time. Mr. Strafacci stated the sign Is very nice, and uses the same state-of-the-art computerized technology as the sign at George Steinbrenner's stadium In Tampa. Messages can be scheduled up to a month in advance, and it has the capability for animation and other programming. Discussion ensued regarding alternatives to the painted steel sheet metal support structure. Mr. Strafacci did not know the diameter of the supporting posts. He estimated the height from the ground to the bottom of the sign at about ten feet, stating the exact height will be determined by the final location. He will test the height for maximum visibility from various angles. One member questioned how much it would cost to create a more aesthetic structure. Mr. Strafacci stated the design was created to resemble the modern appearance of the Harborview Center building. He did not know what would be involved in total redesign. Mr. McCarty pointed out the sign may have to be moved, depending on the location of the new Memorial Causeway bridge. One member pointed out the major negative point in the original presentation had been the adverse Impact of the location In the middle of the street. The majority favored the same sign In the new location. One member expressed regret a design theme has not been established for the waterfront. Mr. McCarty agreed, an overall coordinated approach is needed for Identification markers, signage, and building locations downtown. This issue will be studied in more detail In the future. Member Hamilton moved to approve DRB 96-009 as submitted. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. mdrb09a.96 2 09/24/96 TOTAL P,007 ? i It i P f J AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,AMFNDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE E XIAE TT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 163, RELATED TO THE PUBLIC EDUCATION FACILITY SITING ACT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, 1995 State Legislature passed CSIHB 1797 known as the Public Education Facility Siting Act, which amended Florida Statutes 235, 255, and 163; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater is required by the Public Facility Siting Act to amend it s Comprehensive Plan by identifying land use categories in which public schools are an allowable use; establishing goals, objectives, and policies by which school facilities will be reviewed for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan; and adopting either the Chapter 235 review process or an alternative review process for determining suitability of each proposed school site no later than October 1, 1996; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater and the Pinellas County School District have met and mutually agreed to the proposed goals, objectives, and policies and the alternative review process which will be incorporated into a future interlocal agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes provides for amendment of adopted Comprehensive Plans; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater's Planning and Zoning Board, in their capacity as Local Planning Agency, held a public hearing August 20, 1996, and recommended approval of these amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater City Commission held a public hearing after due notice and adopted these amendments to the Comprehensive Plan on September 19, 1996, after carefully considering the written comments of the State Land Planning Agency and other written and oral comments submitted by members of the public and governing agencies. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: I?NUQG 1. Purpose and Intent. This ordinance is adopted to carry out the purpose and intent of, and to exercise the authority granted pursuant to, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, and more generally to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the Florida Constitution and the Charter of the City of Clearwater. The provisions of this ordinance and the comprehensive plan amendments as adopted by this ordinance are declared to be the minimum requirements necessary to accomplish the purpose, intent and objectives as set forth herein and in the comprehensive plan as adopted on November 16, 1989. Section 2. Amendments thhee Adopted Plan. The amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater, as set forth in the attached exhibits A and B are hereby adopted. ? cdm _3. _ &yMbiliM If any provision of this ordinance or of the comprehensive plan or amendments as adopted by this ordinance should ever be adjudicated invalid for any reason, such provision shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions of this ordinance and the comprehensive plan and amendments to the extent that the remaining provisions may.independently be valid and enforceable. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 19, 1996 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Leslie Dou -Sides, Asst. City Attorney Rita Garvey, . Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2 i s imim x O Mai 'cl o z z 60 z z e ? A 4 ? S0 F-I 00 k-;l -va w ri rn u. ? ? w ? ? w z e ? ? e a u a w a v, u`3 ?x ? n?Z PAZ q? < n. 4 a odd ?W,c? a. >• < ? ? x `a d w ? ? o ? a u. ? ? o ? ? < O O w " ? ? v?x a u j o ?o?]a `° o "? $ `A ? aa<$ ` a ,? x u oo wxa o zz A ? A Asr? ax x u va A O ? ? c cn A ? ? 3 u rn? Aa ? w ppO ?d C?.r a Orn °A Ocn A Odd a O? z ` pp ' ? O ?? ° ? ? 4 'on O? ° ?? ?Q W boo ? °g ¢. Ss. C C4 t? wF r i x Z t? v . z AUpq t ?-? 00 V.d ri .w a C.i .3 O ,.a O ? C4 Rd c l A C4 ? c g a4 c; w°? 9 o ai d ? y a m? a R 2 u v, cas y" ! o? a C] d? wg xx oa d? ? w a? „ o ? pW v? d c 8 x ? 0 E 2 O w0 xx - O zu pp;; Od d d 3 `n oo W ° U o w w N ti, $d a ol? wva rn A a c? in Q o u? vi A a 0°a 5u?rn8 x r?] O A a o ?, °aS w to o sag ts1 w a ? a a w Q a r ???o OUO O a U wa y op o9 cg o 1 8 o! a ? 1 o w `? o o o o a o ?n t-; w d N ou U U ?j ?j C7? U U UU d ? d O U zU ? U 8 W o zo ® U a ? a U oc t FF °?a?e d?'ppZ? ? ??N Q ?? Q p ?° wo4 a a O ?• ? ? rx? p ?w°? a W N Z 4 aZd ? ? c? R ? N w V n w Cry. d ? du 3A ? a. 4RR °p ? ?? O ?o ? U Q. Q U p??p w Qpa rs, ow? ?o ?? ° V6 ° WHO o u u ? a: p yr • ? o IN o ? U pA p cn S> z ^OW? oZA4a?. n yy? Ii1 ri O fl .-x a in :3 ?O W oz m W?W 0 Q ,d W AE?a y?W-. O 'iAA U O `" Q q, d 4 ? o o d ?r aQ F [ 4 Q 3 d V Rf ? W C N ? x W g y ° •? ?' JB w11 -1 s I -ts ? . I?*0-B a $ prop ° 'Eb t? _ ° C 'Zi 78 r a? w o a a, at i EXHIBIT B TO ORDINANCE NO. 6071.% PROPOSED TEXT CHANGES TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE August 19% W5, TQ-MgUnatc 1 n nm and Wand?d l sito o f ii' in cnzlrt m i iii i n wi thg!Qily's m h n i Plan, ObiccU 5.1 Q, i - Ttie City shall pnm c_ffQrts That ?llt r rdina?i_?n of planning between the Q and the Schpol Bggrd for the lpcat?n_anAsfcelopmcnt_of public_ pcational famlitics, 1Po ion Poliq? 5.1.1 bile alucation facililie? rg def_rncd as cicmgntanr schools.-fjg ofigation facilities,., ltemativc edu ti n facilities, middle schools highjchools._an-d area vocational- technical schools of theYinellas -Count SchQQl Distsim Policv_5.1.2 Public u on f Ili 'cs f thPinell Coun h l District are an to bl M2LMjthjy h following fu i land use 1c o 'es: Residential Est$tr Residential Subd tccsiaenuai c.ow Residential Urban Residential Low Medium Residential Medium Residential Hili ResidcntiallOifi% Limited Residential/Of ice General Institutional Policy 5,1.3. Dc Iota On and construction of new public education facilities. or the expansion of an cAstin site, yvithin one of the future land usc_ categories listed_in Policx S.1.2, shall only ,be allowd own determination by the i foll win he reguislig public h rin to held the School Board, that the proposed site is consistent with the Cily's rnmprehensiveplan., P licy S 1.4, In addition to overall consistencxwith the ty's com. grehensiye plan-the pro d location of o„new or expanded public e3ugtion facitiN of the Pinellas County School District thi one of h land use tale ones listed in Poli 5.1 2. shall be reviewed and considered with thf llowin neral ri ria• 1. The proposed location is compatible with present and projected uses of adjacent property 1s.235 19(2)(a]1. 2. The site area of thcproposed location is adequate for its intended use based. upon the State RamuijVments for Educational Facilities and provides sufficient arQa to accommodate all neoded utilities and support facilities and allows for adcxtuatc buffering of undin lap 3. Bases! upon the 5 ,year Capital I>ravnment Prorram_ofthe Pinellas County School District and the Citv'l 2gmprchcnsivc plan, there %ill_?ic oftuatepublic sclvires n 'li i h 1 h l Is.234,193(2)], t nu_t-d presludc_dmlQpmct1L gj Ilas am no lignificant cnvironmcntai constraints tlkl blig &otion faciti0es on the site. I There wiil bg no adycrsc imaagU nn archacol4&iol or_1Dor c sites list+o ink of Hi riPI or designated i 1 11 i ifi n bigori; i 1 f _ The vronascd location is well drainod and soils arc suitable for dcvelopmcnt or ar4 as ptable for dcyclopment and outdoor cdmalloul?nurp.ow&, with drainM improv9cmcnts. 7. The vroposgcd location is not in conflict, with tho-County's St-ormtivater Mamemcnt Plan and lhz i ed wa c h management lan if a fi le 8 The proposed location i not in a velocity fl2gd?zono or a floodm, The 1 ion can accommodate the uMuired parking ;Ind ntici queuing of vehicles on-site, 10, The 12MMgo 120tion_lics outside the area rcggulated by section 333 03 3 F reQ in,e tltc construction of public educational f i S. f.5. The fgllowina Mifie crileria shall also be used to evaluatc wh therpronosed locations of types of schools are consistent with the City's eomprehensiv _plan glementuoL Schools, ial Education Facilities and-Alterna0w Education Facilidcs The proposed location shall have-dhnxt_ac= to at least a miter collector road or AE othgawjs approved y the City after determination of a=ptable traffic impacts on adjacent roads of lesser classification, 2. Outdoor recreational facilities and similar support facilities shall be located and buffered on the proposed site tg miniMiu lmr)gcts on adigcont roiea. Middle Schools 1. The: proposed location shall have dirext actress to at least a minor collector road or as otherwise apnrovet_bv_tlte QN alter dctynninaiion-9f acceata ; ratfic impacu on ad' cent roads of lesser cl ification 2. _Ouldoar recreational facilities _and similar support facilities shall be located And buffered on the proposed site to minimize impacts on adjacent properties. High Schogls 1, The proposed location shall have direct access to at least a maior collector road, or as otherwise approved y the_Ci y attar determination of a=ptable traffic impacts on-adja_cgnt-MdsQ lcsscr classification. 2,. Stadiums. outdoor recrr_ clonal facililics, and similar sunnort _facilities shall be located and buffered on the pLQmsW-siteso minimize impacts on a¢J cxn gropcrtics, Vocational Nbnical Schools J.- -e proposed location shall have direct access to at I. st a maigr gglI gor road, or as othervr g spprovgd by the pity after detenpinatl2n of a2ptable 1rffic impagl§ on Miami roads of lesser classification. 2. Industrial education facilities shall be located and buffcred on the proposed site to minimize impacts on adingnt properties. ZQlicy 5,1.6, Proposed locations that are less than the standard site aggpC 9 prescribed in the Florida Depgrtmol of Education State Rcnuiromen of Educntional Facilities may be determined to be consi tent with_the City's comprehensive plan providr l I requirements czf $,235,19(3). F.S. are met and off-site impacts can be adMuately mitigated, Ppligy 5.1.7. A determinadon that a proposed new site or additional property is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan may be conditioned with reference to specific L)Mgs of public educational facilities. Wig 5 1 8 A the m of consistengy de enmination the i may impggse n ble conditions for development of the site as it relates to any of the criteria in Policies 5.1.4, and 5,1,5. Conditions may not be imposed which conflict with those established in Chapter 235 or the e nif grin Building a mess mutually agreed, [s.235.193(6)], Poligy 5 1 9 Be( re significant hap of program at a public education facility implemented., the,aghool Board and the City shall require a review of the facility',s on-site and off-site impnqs. The &hool Board and the City will work cooperatively to mitigate on-site and &-sile.impgM including impacts to public facilities. identified through the review. Policy 5.1.10. The City and the School Board shall annually -coordinate in the development of their pgg?lyeopital_improvement pmgjAms, Policy 5.1.11. The policies in 4biectiyc_5, labove are assumed to be consistent with, and da, not n lify or conflict with.-the provisions of Chapter 235. F.S, I a AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION 36.033(2)(a), CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD; AMENDING SECTION 36.035(2)(a), CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP ON THE DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 36.033(2)(a), Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 36.033. Planning and zoning board. (2) Composition, appointment and tenn. (a) The planning and zoning board shall consist of seven members who shall be residents of the city. The city commission shall. whenever poss'b1Q. appoint the members of the board with persons possessing professional or acquired experience or interest in the fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture or growth management. Such members shall serve at the pleasure of the commission. Section 2• Section 36.035(2)(a), Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 36.035. Development code adjustment board. (2) Composition, appointments and terms. (a) The development code adjustment board shall consist of five members who shall be residents of the city. The members of the board shall, whenever possible, possess professional training or acquired experience in the fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture or development control. The members shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the commission. Ordinance No. 6075-96 i i I ~f f •f t F .r , 9--1 Section a. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 19. 1996 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Ramela K. Akin City Attorney i 2 Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Ordinance No. 6075-96 ?a.f.,....,,?.?u'i?.?avrw»w,...,.,....?..._.?..r... ?....,..w....? ?.>- r.; •'+c:'^ r ...s? ,r.s.., ?..+?..y..?<?.........,. ? l 1 1ORDINANCE NO-6076-26 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTIONS 40.034, 40.043, 40.0640 40.081. 40.104, and 41.053, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ALLOW NONCOMMERCIAL. PARKING AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, TO IDENTIFY APPLICABLE STANDARDS THEREFOR; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Secli4n 1. Sections 40. 034, 40.043, 40.064, 40.084. 40.104, and 41.053„ Code of Ordinances, are amended to read: Sec. 40.034. Conditional uses. Within single-family " , the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: Sec. 40.043. Conditional uses. Within single-family residential 2 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: Sec. 40.064. Conditional uses. Within single-family residential 4 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: ordhw= 6076-96 1:3 fQ NoirOmm isl parking, Sec. 40.084, Conditional uses. Within single-family residential 6 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: W Noncommercial eking, Sec. 40.104. Conditional uses. Within single-family residential 8 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: Noncommercial parking,. Sec. 41.053. Supplementary standards by category of use. The standards in this section which apply to the identified category of use shall supplement the general standards of use identified in section 41.052. No conditional use shall be authorized unless determined to meet all of the standards applicable thereto. (20) Noncommercial parking may be allowed within the residential, limited office, general office, neighborhood commercial, North Greenwood commercial, downtown/mixed use, highway commercial, infill commercial, and limited industrial districts subject to all of the following: (a) Single fimily d-WHY --eegerty may patking when . single- family -mid f the 13 • required by this Cede; sueh-puMng shall be provided effiuftt ' m the 6CWt eF not be provided to a par-king lot 1 ted -on single family residentially oemA prepear, the am, Wt width and- lei depth of shnie fawAy pfepeFly meets the appMeable dimensional and mmer-isal development and a eenditional use for- par-king en skqk-fim* ? , .Ft?- (ab) The parking lot shall be designed, surfaced and landscaped in accord with all applicable requirements contained in this development code;-hewever-; 'bite -en single (be) Access to the parking lot shall not be provided directly from the street or from any residentially zoned property adjoining the property which is the subject of the conditional use application,- unless specifically authorized by the planning and zoning board, however, access directly from the street or from adjoining residential property shall not be provided to a parking lot located on single-family residentially zoned property. (cd) The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052. (de) Noncommercial parking lots which adjoin residentially zoned property shall be provided with an opaque fence or wall along all property lines adjoining the residentially zoned property; such fence or wall may other. th The parking of trailers, bgaZq boat trailers, recreational vehicles, semitrailer trucks or cabs, commercial vehicles, buses, or vehicles designed to transport wastes or hazardous or noxious materials, wMeh-are i8 prohibited in noncammercial?parking lots in or immiately idjQining..rcs1dentW.distrins. All, site lightingshall be _di=ted away from ' •ni g ?- Wrties and street rights-of-war: lighting OioJ J - re. ' gntiaironer ies shall he equipped with 90 degree cutofffeatums to eliminate light trespass onto adiodx res' tial properties Any lighfing der-wall FequiFed along all prop" • djeim O"A ftem &r?&ft 13 (cf) No portion of any parking space shall be closer than ten feet from the property line of any adjoining single-family residentially zoned property. (fg) All applicable requirements of sections 42.34 and 42.27 shall be satisfied without the granting of any variance therefrom. (gf t or- nenr-esidential uses, sue M parking shall be guaranteed to remain available through ners i unity of title a long term lease or other appropriate instrument running with the land for a term equaling or exceeding the projected life of the use which the parking is to serve. SwAion 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: t - Z?ar?_-V Leslie Dougall d s, Asst. City Attorney September 19, 1996 Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Ordinance 607696 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMA'T'ION ORDINANCE NO. 6076--96 NONCOMMERCIAL PARKING SINGLE FAMILY ZONES ) Pm 0 STREAMLINED PROCESS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROCESS ALLOWS PUBLIC INPUT 0 REPLICATES A PINELLAS COUNTY PROCESS 0 REFLECTS USER-FRIENDLY, BUSINESS-FRIENDLY APPROACH WHILE RETAINING LAND USE COMPATIBILITY REVIEW 0 RECOGNIZES NEED FOR FLEXIBILITY IN REDEVELOPMENT 0 MEETS CLEARWATER'S NEEDS GIVEN OUR EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN COIF . 0 COMMISSION ROIX IS REDUCED 0 POTENTIAL, rOR NEIGHBORHOOD INTRUSION STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL 4 LANDSCAPING REQUIRED; IF" NECESSARY TO MEET COMPATIBILITY ISSUES, THIS LANDSCAPING MAY BE INCREASED ABOVE GENERAL CITY STANDARDS 0 ACCESS LIMITED PROM RESIDENTIALLY-ZONED LOCATIONS 0 FENCE/WALL REQUIRED; IF NECESSARY TO MEET COMPATIBILITY ISSUES, FENCE/WALL HEIGHT MAY BE INCREASED ABOVE GENERAL CITY STANDARDS 0 PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN TYPES OF VEHICLES 0 SITE LIGHTING RESTRICTIONS 0 SETBACK LIMITS SVMCOWARCWL PARKING - SF ZONES F QRQlNANCE_ NO.6080-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF MANOR BOULEVARD NORTH AND WEST OF LAGOON CIRCLE, CONSISTING OF LOT 73, CLEARWATER MANOR, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1751 RAGLAND AVENUE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property Into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed Into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: Lot 73, Clearwater Manor, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded In Plat Book 41, Page 66, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. (A96-25) ecfion 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Central Permitting Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 34 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING -September 19, 1996 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Leslie K. Dougall-Side Assistant City Attorney Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No, 6080.96 I rm iµA/ ffM M 00 -_10 - ton WAS @At M/f !.!f 46 u 51 23 1T 20 M"4, 44 if ism 4) 50 1106 iM. po" 71 42 41 as 49 w. ,w J!fL ?... 4a H•• v. unrna . r rwh 16 21 145 O,pW r.. Q3 4 r.lit ]S t.fo It VAN PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING OWNER: Ken Schilling A: DDa$ ADDRESS: 1751 Ragland Ct PROPERTY 12ESCRIPTI ON: Clearwater Manor, Lot 73 LAND USE PLAN NIN COUNTY: Residential Low R-3 CITY: Residential Low RS 8 ACRES: 0.18 RIGHT-of-WAY: ACRES: ATLAS PAGE: 263A SEC: 06 TWP: 29 S RGE: 16 E I H1N{3 ANb. xONINCi 0AF1D; 10: 1998 v; Cmr'COMMISSIOIU: `5e"' I9 f I996' >. <``'.; :• »<; EXHIBIT A Ordinance No. 6080--96 Is AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF MANOR BOULEVARD NORTH AND WEST OF LAGOON CIRCLE, CONSISTING OF LOT 73, CLEARWATER MANOR, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1751 RAGLAND AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 8 (RS-8); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth In this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located In Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Lot 73, Clearwater Manor, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 41, Page 66, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. (A96-25) (RS-8) - Single-Family Residential 8 Section 2. The Central Permitting Director is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6080-96. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and le al ufficienc[y?: II Leslie Dougall-SiQee Assistant City Attorney September 19, 1996 Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinanaa Ko.9001.90 J ON tR1fy offiN "aa F%m if rw tar Ile fan flat •&A+ Is 21 Nat 40 45 46 51 23 last Iffl fnl ?t If ',era fi7 ffN f a22 17 20 ra~+ 50 fl0f Is 1t ? 48 49 at Sam fall f 42 L43 faM w ilea tafo 7i am = VANDMOMT DIL 20 ' ? fa0f 59 -'1"58'f57* 5 15 16 M 17 la w 19 133 fIf 034 uH 35 fI to R VAN 32 1 I? PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING OWNER: Ken Schilling A: ,Q§-25 ADDRESS: 1751 Ragland Ct PROPERTY _DESCRIPTION: Clearwater Manor, Lot 73 LAND Uff-PPLAN z NIN COUNTY: Residential Low R-3 CITY: Residential Low RS 8 RE • 0.18 RIGHT-of-WAY: ACRES: ATLAS PAGE: 263A SEC: 06 TWP: 29 S RGE: 16 E 'LJgh?NIN i 1ND.24NING 8L?ARD: Sep 'E0: X996 :CITY. C MMI5SION . 5e :19 1998 Ordinance 6081-96 ORDINANCE_ NO, 6082-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, VACATING THE 10 FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LYING ALONG THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF LOT 12, FOREST WOOD ESTATES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, David D. Clausen, owner of real property located In the City of Clearwater, has requested that the City vacate the drainage and utility easement described in Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that said easement is not necessary for municipal use and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following: The 10 foot drainage and utility easement lying along the Southeast side of Lot 12, Forest Wood Estates as recorded in Plat Book 69, Page 17 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater quitclaims and releases all of its right, title and interest thereto. ,9ection 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption. eotian 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 19, 1996 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and and legal sufficiency; John Carassas r Assistant City Attorney Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6082-98 { I? tf,%Io ordinance 6082-96 fTVT?T V?'?"P ORDINANCE NO.6085-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF-CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO RENTAL CHARGES FOR BOAT SLIPS AND DOCKING SPACES AT CLEARWATER MUNICIPAL MARINA; AMENDING SECTION 33.028, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE INCREASES IN RENTAL CHARGES UP TO TEN (10) PERCENT ANNUALLY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: S2gtion 1. Section 33.028, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sao. 33.028. Rental charges, The city manager shall establish charges for the use of boat slips and docking spaces, which charges shall be uniform as to type of spaces or services to be furnished, shall be established in writing, shall be posted at the marina building on Clearwater Beach, and shall be effective 72 hours after written notice of change thereof has been so posted. The city-manager 3s Section 2. The provision of this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED a+ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: John C. Carassas Assistant City Attorney Septembe_r_ 1,9, _ 1996 Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance 6085-96 i Item #18 F .X -, aF A ?? S ?a f> Ctl' F? Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Item #: Meeting Date: SUBJECT: Independent Audit Contract for Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 1996 thru 2000 :5.. RECOMMENDATIONIMOTION: Approve the Attached Agreement with Ernst & Young LLP for Auditing Services for the five fiscal years ending September 30, 1996 thru 2000 for a total fee not to exceed $426,000. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • City Charter Article II, Section 2.01(c)(3) prohibits any audit firm from being employed for more than five consecutive years. Coopers & Lybrand has been the City's auditors for the past five years. • The City solicited proposals for auditing services from qualified firms per RFP 167-96 issued July 26, 1996. • Six firms provided proposals which were ranked by a selection committee consisting of the City Manager, Budget Director, Finance Director, Internal Audit Director, Solid Waste Controller, and Finance Controller. • The proposal rankings from high (best) to low were: Ernst & Young; Grant Thornton; KPMG Peat Marwick; Arthur Andersen; Deloitte & Touche; and Bollenback & Forrett p.a.. • Per the committee's rankings the top four firms were selected and interviewed by the Committee. The committee rankings of proposals, oral interviews, and reference checks were combined per the RFP guidelines to arrive at a composite ranking for each firm (see attached). • Ernst & Young LLP was the top-ranked firm per the attached ranking summary. • Fee negotiations were undertaken with Ernst & Young resulting in fixed fees of $79,000, $82,000, $851000, $88,000, and $92,000 for the five fiscal years respectively. • The City has the option to cancel the contract for non-performance. Reviewed by: Ori inatin Department: Costs: Commission Action: Legal Finance Department $426,000 0 Approved Budget "Vila Total 0 Approved wlCondilions Purchasing User Department: $78,000 Ci Denied Risk Mgmt. Finance Department Current Fiscal Year 0 Continued to: IS NIA Fundin Source: ACM 4,5 r L_- 11 Capital improvement Other NIA yertl IM operating: Date: 7119196, 7136196, 8/16190 13 other: Attachments: Paper: Tampa Tribune Auditing Agreement Date: 7118188, 810186, 8133196 Ranking Summary Paper: Warfield's Tampa Bay ' Review Submitted by: 0 Not Required Apnroarlation Codes: ?eAdIA7 Aff ed_EWles: 010-08821.630100-613-000 Z maa ® Notified 181-99488.630100.654400 (CD8G) ? Not Required 188.09311.630100.662-000 (CRA) 0 Printed an recycled paper • The previous audit fee (for the fiscal year ending September 30, 9995) was $93,300. The proposed agreement results in a 15.3° decrease in audit fees for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996. • The audit fee includes approximately $9,000 to be charged to the CDBG Fund; $1,000 to be charged to the CRA; and $1,000 to be charged to the DDB for related year-end auditing services. The remainder will be charged to the auditing services line item included in the Finance ,jr Department's budget. Funding has been provided in the 96-97 budget for the September 30, 1996 audit fees, and will be provided in future years, per the budget line items listed below. i (1) r0 9-? V •ry oral .pni • pt as ? 0 U C *b q o oU it ? O ,w A v m wQ 49 N bO ?A a l13 0 N O A 0 8 I? Q? ?I c? I? a? 'b o cc 0 o w sd + cq • E•+ aJ + C? ? 4) co ? Q) 4-4 O CO) ? ? O QJ C b O c 421 ? O U ? cl) v Q) ;-I ccd, 4s) bl) > biD C, q - b CD 0 ?4 w 1 o .d o cd ° t? rti ,p p o k .° ? N o ? 4.2 CYD O b „ ? 4-4 O . ,.D .4 U k 2 O O 4.2 O 1 (L) bJ) bap co A 44 cd b bi) A 0 bJ) `d 4-3 cd q co) w c? 424 cd Q) AUDITING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1996 by and between the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, whose mailing address is P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida, 34618-4748, hereinafter referred to as "City," and Ernst & Young LLP, a firm of Certified Public Accountants, located at 100 North Tampa Street, Suite 2200, Tampa, Florida 33602, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor" WiTNESSETH WHEREAS, the City is required by Article II, Section 2.01(c)(3) of the City Charter to provide for an annual audit of its financial accounts; and WHEREAS, the City participates in Community Development Block Grant and other Federal, State and County Assistance programs which require independent financial and compliance audits in accordance with rules established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and other agencies; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is in the business of public accounting, is fully qualified to meet the requirements of applicable City, State and Federal law, and desires to perform the necessary services: WHEREAS, City has selected contractor to provide Auditing Services pursuant to Request for Proposal #167-96 which is incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. J'erm. This agreement relates specifically to the City's fiscal years ending September 30, 1996 thru September 30, 2000. This agreement may be terminated by the City on the basis of unsatisfactory performance with written notice at least six months prior to the September 30 fiscal year-end. City Charter Section 2.01(c)(3) currently prohibits any single audit firm from being employed for more than five consecutive years. 2. Ong of Services. Contractor agrees to perform the Scope of Services described in Request for Proposal #167-96. The Contractor shall read the City's comprehensive annual financial report for compliance with GAAP and the applicable requirements of the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting program of the Government Finance Officers Association and assist the City in complying with new or existing requirements. The Contractor shall express an opinion on the fair presentation of the City's general purpose financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, for the fiscal years ending September 30, 1996 thru September 30, 2000. The Contractor shall also express an opinion on the fair presentation of the City's combining and individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Contractor is not required to audit the supporting schedules contained in the comprehensive annual financial report, however, the Contractor shall provide an "in-relation-to" report on the supporting schedules based on the audit procedures applied during the audit of the general purpose financial statements and the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules. The Contractor is not required to audit the statistical section of the report. The Contractor shall also perform the required financial and compliance audits associated with the Community Development Block Grant and other Federal, State, and County Assistance programs in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984 (PL 98-502) and rules of other agencies. 3. Auditina Standards. In performing the services described in #2 above, the Contractor shall comply with the following: ° generally accepted auditing standards the standards set forth for financial audits in the U.S. General Accounting Office's (GAO) Govemment Auditing Standards (1994 Revision) the provisions of the federal Single Audit Act of 1984 ° U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-128, Audits of State and Local Govemments Section 11.45 Florida Statutes regulations of the State Department of Banking and_Finance Rules adopted by the State of Florida Auditor General for form and content of governmental unit audits ° Audits of State and Local Governmental Units (Revised) - AICPA ° Chapter 73-600 of the Florida Statutes referring to Fire District Audit requirements Rules adopted by the State of Florida Auditor General for audits of state grant and aid appropriations. 2 As a part of the audit, the Contractor will consider the City's Internal control structure, 'as required by generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards. 4. $,epgrta, Following the completion of the audit, the Contractor shall issue the following reports: ° A report on the fair presentation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. A report on the internal control structure based on the auditor's understanding of the control structure and assessment of control risk. A report on compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including those relating to funds received form a State of Florida grants and aid appropriation pursuant to a grant or contract. A report on the internal control structure used in administering federal assistance programs. ° A report on compliance with laws and regulations related to major and non major federal financial assistance programs. A supplementary management letter if required to comply with the regulations of the State of Florida Auditor General. A report on compliance with general compliance requirements as required by the Single Audit Act of 1984 and OMB Circular A-928. 5. PUblic Records. The Contractor shall retain all working papers for a minimum of five (5) years, unless notified in writing by the City of the need to extend the retention period. The Contractor shall make working papers available, upon request, to the following parties or their designees: ° ° City of Clearwater U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) 3 i ° Parties designated by the federal or state governments or by the City of Clearwater as part of an audit quality review process ° Auditors of entities of which the City of Clearwater Is subrecipient of grant funds In addition, the Contractor shall respond to the reasonable inquiries of successor auditors and allow successor auditors to review working papers relating to matters of continuing accounting significance. 6. Annual- Financial &WI ts. The Contractor shall assist the City in scheduling the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to be completed and issued no later than February 1, succeeding each fiscal year. Contractor/City meetings will be held at least once per month until completion of this contract. Weekly status meetings shall be held while the Contractor is working at the City. The Contractor shall complete performance under this contract by March 15 succeeding each fiscal year. 7. Professional Fees. The Contractor shall bill the City and the City upon Finance Director's approval shall pay the Contractor for the performance of the services under this contract on the basis of the Contractor's normal and customary charges for such services, plus ordinary out-of-pocket expenses customarily stated separately by the Contractor in his general practice, the same to be separately stated and itemized. The total amount of this contract including out-of-pocket expenses shall not exceed: Fiscal Year 1996 $79,000 Fiscal Year 1997 $2,000 Fiscal Year 1998 85,000 Fiscal Year 1999 88,000 Fiscal Year 2004 92,000 The City may, by amendment of this agreement, increase this maximum fee and/or extend the completion date upon the Contractor's showing evidence of conditions which 4 require substantially more time than would generally be required to perform the prescribed services. Progress payments will be made periodically for work completed to date based on invoices submitted by the Contractor. The sum of such progress payments shall not exceed 90% of the maximum specified above. Payment for professional fees shall be paid according to the Florida Prompt Payment Act. F.S. 218.70. 8. Indemnification and Insurance;, Contractor agrees to defend and indemnify, save and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, suits, judgments, and liability for death, personal injury, bodily injury, or property damage arising directly or indirectly from the performance by the Contractor, its employees, subcontractors, or assigns, including legal fees, court costs, or other legal expenses. Witheut limiting its liability under this Agreement, Contractor, at its expense shall secure and provide to the City professional liability insurance in an amount of at least $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. This provision shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 9. !QQDfl6ct of1ntQ.reat. It is understood by the City and Contractor that Contractor is not aware of any clients of the firm that currently present any conflict between the interests of the City and other clients of Contractor. If any potential conflict of interest arises during the time Contractor is representing the City, Contractor will promptly inform the City. The City is under no f obligation to agree to permit the conflict representation. 10. Q205tr ction and Amendments. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing duly entered into by the City and Contractor. 11. Attorneys-fees. In the event that either party seeks to enforce this Agreement through attorneys at law, then the parties agree that each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees, and that jurisdiction for such an action shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in Pinellas County, Florida. 5 (SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AUDITING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CLEARWATER AND ERNST & YOUNG LLP) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first above written: Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: s'. Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager ";. Approved as to form and legal Attest: sufficiency: John Carassas, Asst. City Attomey Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cleric Witnesses: ERNST & YOUNG LLP ' By Attest: l £}, : r ' S Clearwater City Commission Item a: Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date. SUBJECT: GAS STEEL MATERIALS RECOMMENDATIONNOTION: Award a contract effective 1014196 for the purchase of various steel gas materials to The Avanti Company, Avon Park, FL, at an estimated Cost of $27,065.60; ATS Industries, Inc., Safety Harbor, FL, at an estimated cost of $45,763.88; Equipment Control Company, Norcross, GA, at an estimated cost of $12,088.25; Empire Pipe & Supply Company, Tampa, FL, at an estimated cost of $15,795.00; Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., Pinellas Park, FL, at an estimated cost of $1,845.54; Florida Industrial Products, Tampa, FL, at an estimated cost of $3,133.21; Hughes Supply, Inc., Clearwater, FL, at an estimated cost of $13,815.76; M.T. Deason Company, Birmingham, AL, at an estimated cost of $57,053.89; Stuart Steel Protection Corp., Somerset, NJ, at an estimated cost of $1,638.40; Utilities Supply, Loganville, Ga., at an estimated cost of $2,052.00; for a total estimated cost of $180,251.53, which are the most responsive and responsible bids submitted in accordance with the specifications, ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • This bid represents Clearwater Gas System's estimated annual requirements for steel gas materials to be ordered as needed. The steel gas materials are required to construct new gas mains and service lines and to repair existing gas mains and service lines. r Items # 54 and #104 are not recommended for award as only one (1) bidder submitted a bid on these items, and these items as bid did not meet our gas specifications. • After careful evaluation, The Assistant Director of CGS Gas Supply & Operations recommends awarding the items as follows: Items 52,53,55-67, 97 - 103,105-110,137-141 - Avanti Company Items 111-118 - ATS Industries Items 176-179 Items 95, 96, 131-136, 152-164 Items 1-12 Items 39-41, 124,125 Items 13-38, 42-47, 93,94 - Empire Pipe - Equipment Control Company - Ferguson Enterprises - Florida Industrial - Hughes Supply Reviewed by: Legal Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt. is ACM Other fm!age?r- N/A Originating Department: % Costs: Commission Action: Clearwater Gas System Estimated $180,251,53 ? Approved Total ? Approved with Conditions User Department: Estimated $180,251.53 ? Denied Clearwater Gas System Current Fiscal Year ? Continued to: Advertised: Date: Pinellas Review 6/7/96 Paper. Tampa Tribune 613196 ? Not Required Affected Parties Funding Source: ? Capital lmprovemenL ? Operating: ? Other: Appropriation Code 423-00000-141130- Q00-000 Attachments: Bid Tab & Summary 126.96 ? Notified ® Not Required ? None 0 Printed on recycled paper Items 48-51, 68-82, 127-130, 142-151, 165-175- M. T. Deason Items 119-123, 126 - Stuart Steel Protection Items 83-92 - Utilities Supply • These materials will be received to the inventory code 423-00000-141130-000-000 and charged to the appropriate code when issued from the warehouse. e:\ngnnda\atO81Mt6.doc , 7°;i1.• I I Si ii", :,f { 't. E'• 11' 1?• SSa ' . 1 }.'r. X71;1 °C ,fT<< CITY OF CLEARWATER BID 120-H GAS MATERIALS STEEL OPENED JUNE 111, 10% BID TABULATION PAGE 1 OF 4 U_M ITEM DESCRIMON FLANGE 1 1"WELD FLANGE (SLIP ON) 1250 FLAT FACE 2 2" WELD FLANGE (SLIP ON) 1250 FLAT FACE 3 3"M4:LD FLANGE (SLIP ON) 1250 FLAT FACE 4 4" WELD FLANGE (SLIP ON) 1250 FLAT FACE 5 6"VVELD FLANGE (SLIP ON) 1250 FLAT FACE 6 8" WELD FLANGE (SLIP ON) 1250 FLAT FACE 7 2"(HRIEADED FLANGE 8 3"THREADED FLANGE 0 2•MPTX7V200THREADED FLANGE 10 W X 4" STEEL WELD REDUCERS CONCENTRIC 11 8-X 4" STEEL VVELD REDUCERS CONCENTRIC 12 8" X W STEEL WELD REDUCERS CONCENTRIC FLANGE TOTAL: ELBOWS 13 1' STEEL 45 DEGREE ELL 14 1 112" STEEL 45 DEGREE ELL 15 2" STEEL 45 DEGREE ELL 16 4" STEEL 45 DEGREE ELL 17 V NCH STEEL 45 DEGREE ELL 18 8 INCH STEEL 45 DEGREE ELL 19 1"BTEEL 90 DEGREE ELL (LONG RADIUS) 20 1 112" STEEL 00 DEGREE ELL (LONG RADIUS) 21 2" STEEL 90 DEGREE ELL (LONG RADIUS) 22 3" STEEL 90 DEGREE ELL (LONG RADIUS) 23 4'STEEL 90 DEGREE ELL (LONG RADIUS) 24 6" STEEL 90 DEGREE ELL (LONG RADIUS) 25 8" STEEL 90 DEGREE ELL (LONG RADIUS) ELBOW TOTAL: TEES .. 26 I%1" X 1" STEEL TEES 27 2X 2X 2"STEEL TEES 28 4"X4'X4"STEELTEE5 29 6'X6"X6"STEELTEES 30 4X 4"X 2" STEEL TEES 2"X 2"X I Vr STEEL TEES 1 6' X B" X 4" STEEL TEES 2 4"X4'XrSTEELTEES TEE TOTAL: CAP8 3 2' CAPS 4 3" CAPS 5 4" CAPS 6 6"CAPS 7 8"CAPS CAP TOTAL: REDUCING ELLS 39 1"X 3/4'90 DEGREE STEEL REDUCING ELLS (LONG RADIUS) 40 1114* X 314" 90 DEGRE STEEL REDUCING ELLS (LONG RADIUS) 41 1114- X 1'90 DEGREE STEEL REDUCING ELLS (LONG RADIUS) REDUCING ELLS TOTAL* STRAIGHT MELD REDUCERS 42 2"X 1' STEEL WELD REDUCING CONCENTRIC 43 3" X 2" STEEL WELD REDUCING CONCENTRIC 44 4"X 2" STEEL VVELD REDUCING CONCENTRIC 45 4" X 3" STEEL WELD REDUCING CONCENTRIC 46 6'X 4" STEEL WELD REDUCING CONCENTRIC 47 8'X 8" STEEL WELD REDUCING CONCENTRIC STRAIGHT WELD REDUCERS TOTAL: t UtUELLER.4111740 OR MCI)ONALD BUS METER STOPS AS 304' 49 1" 50 1114" 61. 2' METER STOPS TOTAL: i ATS INDUSTRIES, INC, AVANTI COMPANY SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA AVON PARK FLORIDA QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL.PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 12 s 9.02 S 70 3 9 67 S 5 i 9,32 S 18 3 12.18 s 12 s 19.93 s 8 ; 29,76 S 70 s 12.02 S 35 $ 14,52 S 20 ; 23.29 S 9 ; 16.03 $ 6 $ 24.15 $ 8 $ 21.45 s s 5 s 3.27 $ 5 3 3.38 i 5 s 3.55 $ 12 s 7.56 $ 10 s 16.65 $ 6 S 33.00 S 24 S 3.43 s 6 S 3.53 $ 100 s 3.89 S 30 s 6.93 $ 40 s I t.60 S 8 $ 27,95 $ 8 S 51.76 s S 8 S 8.81 S 50 S 11.08 S 20 s 21.46 S 8 $ 38.43 S e S 24.22 S 6 $ 15.70 $ 8 $ 51.93 s 8 S 24.22 s s` TO s 3.12 s 12 3 4.00 S 24 s 5.09 S 6 s 9.54 ; ti 3 14.15 S ; 12 NO BID s 6 NO BID $ 6 NO BID s U1 12 $ 6.30 S a s 5.46 $ 8 s 8.73 3 6 3 7.63 3 4 3 19.03 s 2 3 2146 S s 1000 NO BID ' S 300 NO BID ; 200 NO BID ; ISO NO BID s s 72.24 s 12.00 s 14400 480.90 s 12.00 s 840 00 46.60 s 16.00 S 8000 219 24 s 20.00 3 390.00 235.56 S 32,00 S 384.00 178 50 s 46.00 S 288.00 841.40 ; 1525 S 1,087.50 506.20 s 2300 S 605.00 465.60 NO Wo i 9918 S 24.25 s 145.50 144.90 : 35.50 $ 213.00 128.70 S 32.00 S 192.00 3,40422 INCOMPLETE 16.95 ; 4.75 S 2175 16.90 S 4.80 $ 24.00 17.75 S 5.10 $ 25.50 90.72 s 10.75 ; 129.00 18650 S 26.00 S 280.00 198.00 ; 46.00 S 278.00 82.32 3 4.90 S 117.60 21.18 S 500 s 30.00 38100 s 5.55 S 555.00 207.90 s 1 D.00 ; 300.00 464,00 S 16.50 s 660.00 167,70 $ 39.00 $ 234.00 310.56 ; 72.15 s 432.90 2,168.88 3 3,067.75 52.80 S 13.50 S 61.00 554,00 s 14.65 s 732.50 429.20 " S 28.00 S 580.00 230.58 s 51.00 ; 306.00 145.32 $ 33.00 ; 196,00 94.20 s 25.00 S 150.00 311.58 ; 65.50 S 393.00 145.32 3 33.00 S 198.00 1,963.08 s 2,616.50 2t8 40 S 5.50 $ 385.00 4800 ; 5.50 S 66.00 122.16 S 7,50 s 100.00 57.24 S 12.50 s 75.00 84.90 s 21.00 S 12600 530.70 s 832.00 NO D $ NO B s - IIO BID s - i - 7590 s 9.00 $ 10800 32.76 s 7.75 ; 46.50 52.30 S 12.40 S 74.40 45.78 $ 10.65 i 65,16 64.12 S 22.35 $ 89.40 42.90 s 29.00 S 59.80 31154 ; 443.20 • NO BID 3 • NO BID S • NO BID ; NO BID ; • 3 III "' ' PAOfl tD 54??? BERT LOWE SUPPLY CO. EMPIRE PIPE d SUPPLY CO. EOUIPMENT CONTROLS CO. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC, FLA. INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS TAMPA, FLORIDA TAMPA FLORIDA NORCROSS GEORGIA PINELLAS PARK, FLORIDA TAMPA, FLORIDA ITEM UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT. PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 S 7.37 i 08.44 NO BID S S 5.80 S 09.60 x 3 05 S 46,20 $ 3.60 $ 4320 2 S 7,00 S 548.00 NO BID ; S 6.85 S 479.50 S 4 27 S 298.90 S 7.79 S 545,30 3 $ 10.00 S 50.D0 NO 131D S S 0.90 S 44.50 S 5.96 S 2900 $ 10.322 S 61.61 4 S 12.60 S A-30.40 NO BID S S 10.90 S 180.20 $ 7.00 $ 140.40 S 19 049 S 234.08 5 S 20.80 S 249.60 NO BID S $ 17.00 S 204.00 S 12 56 S 150.72 S 21.229 S 254.75 8 S 31,40 S 188.40 NOBIO S S 20.50 S 159.00 S 19.04 3 114.24 S 32.136 S 192.82 7 S 9.80 S BBB 00 NO BID S S 9.05 S 633.50 S 5 48 S 383.60 S 7.135 $ 49045 0 S 11.00 S 413.00 NO BID $ S 13.30 S 485.50 S 8 24 S 208.40 S 10.732 S 37562 9 NO BID x - NO BID S S 23.15 $ 483.00 x 6 26 S 125.20 $ 18.634 S 372.68 f0 $ 15.34 S 92.04 NO BID S S 15.95 S 95.70 5 11.62 S 69.72 $ 15.203 $ 91.22 11 S 22.82 ; 136,92 NO BID 3 S 24 20 S 145 20 S 17.51 S 10506 $ 54.00 S 324.00 12 S 20.38 S 122.28 NO BID 1 S 20.95 S 125.70 $ 15.55 $ 93.30 S 43.20 $ 259.20 INCOMPLETE S S 3,061.40 $ 3,244.72 Sk 13 $ 3.25 ; 16.25 NO BID $ S 3.80 $ 19.00 S 2.37 3 11.85 S 3.523 $ 17,62 14 $ 3 25 S 16.25 NO DID S S 3.70 S 18.50 S 2.45 $ 12.23 S 3.523 S 17.82 15 S 3.25 S 16.25 NO BID S $ 3.80 $ 19.00 $ 2.58 S 12.90 S 3.523 S 17.62 16 5 8.07 S 96.84 NO DID s S 8.30 $ 99.60 $ 5.48 S 85.76 $ 8.714 S 104.57 17 S 17.17 S 171.70 110 BID $ S 1920 $ 192.00 S 13.52 S 13520 S 18.54 S 185.40 iB S 29.88 S 179.28 NO BID 3 $ 35.10 $ 210.60 S 23,93 $ 143.58 x 32.26 S 193.56 19 $ 3.43 S 8232 NOBID S S 2.75 S 66.00 $ 2,49 S 59.76 S 3,700 S 66.99 20 S 3.43 S 20.58 NO BID S S 3.40 S 20,40 ; 2.58 S 15.36 S 3.700 S 22.25 21 3 3.43 $ 343.00 NO 810 i S 3.95 S 395.00 S 2.81 S 281.00 $ 3.706 S 370.80 22 i 5.49 $ 164.70 NO BID S S 7.10 S 213.00 i 5.04 S 151.20 $ 5.933 $ 177.99 23 S 9.27 S 370.80 NO BID 5 3 11.60 S 464.00 S 8.41 S 336.40 $ 10.012 $ 400,48 24 $ 2260 x 135.00 NO BID S S 27.40 S 164.40 $ 20.27 $ 121.62 $ 36.00 $ 216.00 25 S 41.90 S 251.40 NO BID S S 50.60 S 303.60 S 37.52 S 225.12 $ 60.00 S 360.00 ; 1,664.37 $ S 2,185.10 S 1,572.00 S 2,172.88 26 i 8.97 3 53.82 NO BID S S 9.10 S 54.60 S 6.39 $ 30.34 S 8.899 S 53.39 27 S 9.72 S 486.D0 NO BID S $ 11.40 $ 570.00 i 803 S 401.50 ; 9.641 S 482.05 26 i 18.51 S 370.20 NO DID i $ 20.90 $ 416.00 S 14.83 S 298.60 S 18.355 S 367.10 29 i 33.05 S 203.10 NO BID S S 40.00 $ 24540 S 27.86 S 167.16 S 33.658 S 201.35 30 S 21.68 S 131.28 NO DID S S 25.95 S 155,70 3 17.27 $ 103.62 $ 21.092 S 130.15 S 18.64 S 99.84 NO BID S s 15.30 S 91,80 S 11.38 S 68.28 S 18.501 S 99.01 1 3 43.40 $ 260.40 NO 010 S $ 48.00 S 258.00 3 35,28 S 211.68 S 43.013 3 25806 2 ; 21 88 S 131.211 NO 610 S S 24.70 S 148.20 S 17.27 i 103.621 S 21.692 S 130.15 $ 1,735.92 S S 1,971.70 3 1,392.80 3 1,721.28 3 S 3.65 $ 248.50 NO BID S S 3.60 S 252.00 S 2 26 S 158.20 S 3.523 $ 246.81 4 S 3.55 S 42.60 NO DID $ $ 4.30 S 51.60 $ 2.90 $ 34.80 S 3.523 S 42.20 5 S 4.68 S 112.32 NO DID S $ 6.55 S 133.20 S 369 S 88.513 S 4.636 S 111.26 0 $ 8.60 S 51.60 NO BID S $ 9.75 S 58.50 S 692 x 41.62 ; 33.60 S 201.60 7 S 13.28 S 79.68 NO BID $ ; 14.70 S 88.20 $ 9.90 S 59.40 S 39.00 $ 23400 S 534.70 S $ 583.50 3 38248 i 835.75 39 NO BID S - NO BID ; NO 810 S - NO BID S - S 12.653 S 151.84 40 NO BID s ND BID ; NO BID S NO BID i S 12.726 $ 76.38 BB 41 NO BID S NO BID S NO BID S NO BID S S 11111 s : - x $ 42 S 6.17 S 74.04 NO BID 3 S 69D i 82.60 S 4.57 S 64 B4 $ 6.119 ; 7343 43 $ 5.61 S 33.66 NO BID $ S 6.80 S 40.80 S 3.96 S 23.76 S 5.562 S 33.37 44 $ 804 ; 40.24 NO BID $ i 8.75 S 62.50 S 6.33 S 37.98 S 7.973 S 47.84 45 S 729 S 43.74 NO BID $ i 9.1)0 $ 54.00 S 5.53 S 33.18 S 7.231 S 43.39 48 S 15.34 S 61.38 NO BID ; S 10.00 $ 64.00 S 11.62 S 46.48 S 15.203 S 60.61 47 i 2013 S 40.76 NO BID S $ 21.60 S 43.20 $ 15.55 S 31.10 S 43.20 $ 86.40 S 301.80 S S 337.30 S' 227,34 $ 345.24 46 NO BID $ NO BID S S 9.95 S 9,950,00 NO BID S - NO BID s ,49 NO BID $ NO DID S NO BID $ - NO BID S - NO 010 $ 50 NO BID S NO BID S NO 010 i - NO BID S NO BID $ 51 NO 010 S NO BID S NO DID S NO BID S NO BID S i - S , INCOMPLETE i - S - A ?^M `" P GE 1C HUGHES SUPPLY INC, M.T. DEASO N COMPANY MYLON C. JACOBS SUPPLY CLEARWATER FLORIDA BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA BROKEN ARROW, OKLAHOMA ITEM UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 s 3.03 S 47.16 3 5.88 s 70.56 NO BID i 2 3 4.17 S 291.90 S 6.76 3 47320 NO BID 3 3 f 5.64 f 29.20 S 9 29 S 4845 NO BID ; 4 S 7.63 $ 137.34 3 1058 S 190.44 NO BID i 5 ; 12.04 $ 144.48 S 16 81 S 225.72 NO BID ; 6 S 1864 ; 111.84 s 29.10 3 17460 NO BID 3 7 i 7.37 ; 515.90 i 1234 S 063 00 NO 810 ; 6 ; 8.90 ; 311.50 s 1419 s 52465 NO BID S 9 NO BID $ $ 25.73 s 514.60 NO BID s 10 NO 00 i - 3 16.87 3 101.22 No BID s 11 NO 810 $ - $ 25.10 S 150.60 NO BID 3 12 NO BID s 3 22.43 S 134.50 NO Bin s INCOMPLETE. S 3,47042 3 13 14 15 to 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 29 30 3 ?i 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 46 49 50 51 s f ; i s s S s f s 3 3 f 2.27 3 11.35 f 2.35 S 11.75 s 2.47 3 12.35 f 5.25 S 6300 S 12,95 3 129.50 s 2204 S 137.64 f 238 ; 57.12 s 2.45 f 14.70 s 2.70 f 270.00 s 4.81 ; 144.30 $ 6.06 ; 32240 s 19.42 S 116.52 s 35. V-A It i ?o 6.12 S 3672 3 7.70 S 385.00 3 14.31 S 286.20 S 26.70 $ 16020 3 16.55 s 00.30 $ 10.91 3 65.46 S 33.81 S 202.06 S 1 ? S GwtS .??` 2.17 3 151.90 V 2.78 3 33.38 3 354 $ 84.98 S 663 ; 39.78 f S lo.ilts4 .? NO 010 s NO DID 3 NO 010 OID s S s s i s s 3 3 ; 3 3 s S s S 4.47 S 53.64 3 S 187 $ 23.22 s S 6.19 $ 37.14 f S 5.42, S 32.52 s f 11.35 S 4552 3 3 15 3 " NO 810 i - 3 NO DID $ - S NO BID 3 - f NO DID 3 S s - 3.02 S 15.10 3 35 s 16.75 4 38 's 21.90 6.94 3 107 25 19.99 3 199.90 34 78 S 200.08 3.17 s 7608 3.56 s 21.36 3.81 S 381.00 6.09 $ 182.70 10.30 s 412.00 24 95 3 14970 4645 $ 27370 3 2,071.15 9 31 3 55.86 1009 3 504.50 1921 f 384.20 3504 S 21024 23 52 s 141.12 17.46 S 104.76 46.31 $ 277.66 23.52 S 141A2 3 1,81966 3 64 S 258.30 3 69 S 44.28 4,85 3 116.40 B 92 S 53 52 1364 s 83.04 s 555.64 NO BID S NO BID s NO BID 3 S 6.79 S 61.48 6.17 $ 37.02 885 S 53.10 0.03 f AISAB 16.87 $ 67.48 22.43 3 4486 S 332.12 7.65 S 7,650.00 954 S 2,862.00 1427 ; 2,854.00 2600 3 3.900.00 s 17,266.D0 NO BID $ NO BID 3 NO BID s NO BID 3 NO BID 3 NO BID f NO BID i NO DID s NO BID 3 NO BID s NO BID s NO BID 3 NO BID $ s NO 010 3 NO 510 s NO BID s NO BID s NO BID s NO BID s NO 010 s NO 810 s NO BID $ NO BID $ NO BID $ NO BID 3 NO BID 3 s NO BID 3 NO BID $ NO BID s s NO 810 S NO 818 3 NO DID 3 NO BID s NO BID s NO DID S s NO SID s NO SID f NO BID 3 NO BID $ i SAT+ PEERLESS SUPPLY, INC. CtEARWATER. FLORIDA UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE NO BID $ S 396 3 277.20 s 6 23 S 31.15 S 1002 S 180.36 s 15 48 3 185 52 s 2425 3 146.10 i 6 65 s 465.50 s 8 82 s 308.70 NO BID s s 1046 s 62.76 s 22.38 ; 134 20 3 2074 3 124.44 INCOMPLETE 1 - 3 065 $ 3.25 - $ 2.09 $ 10,45 - f 222 S 11.60 - $ 5.21 3 62.52 f 14.68 3 148 BO - 3 26.10 S 15660 - S 3.50 s 8400 - $ 2.44 S 14,64 - 3 2.66 S 268.00 S 5.47 S 164.10 - S 9.14 S 365.60 • 3 2083 S 124.98 - 3 37.88 S 227.28 S 1,641.82 $ 6.90 3 41.40 s 9.72 3 48600 s 1344 S 266 80 s 34.20 S 265.20 S 19.66 s 119.18 S 12.48 s 74.68 f 45.16 S 270.96 $ 1986 S 119.16 - s 1,585.56 .; s 3.56 S 249.20 • s 3.19 s 36.25 s 4.06 3 97.44 i 7.61 3 4566 _ i 10.90 $ 65.40 s 495.98 .' NO BID s NO 810 f NO DID S - 3 S 4.12 5 49.44 s 3.76 $ 22.56 • $ S69 $ 34.14 3 7.15 $ 42.90 s 1046 S 41.84 s 20.74 S 41.40 i 23236 3 11.04 S 11,04000 NO BID $ NO DID s - NO BID S • S 11,040.00 STUART STEEL UNIT PRICE T NO BID $ NO BID $ NO BID $ NO BID i NO BID ; NO BID $ NO BID $ NO BID ; NO BID $ NO BID S NO BID S NO BID S 3 NO BID s NO BID $ NO BID $ NO BID 3 NO BID 3 NO BID $ NO DID S NO DID s NO 010 s NO DID S N0810 S NO DID S NO 010 3 f NO BID S NO BID S - NO 010 3 - NO 010 S - NO BID s - NO BID - $ NO BID s - NO BID 3 s - NO DID 3 NO DID 3 NO BID S NO BID 3 NO BID $ 3 NO BID S NO BID i NO BID 3 S NO BID i NO BID 3 NO BID 3 NO BID 3 NO BID s NO BID $ III NO BID S NO 010 3 NO 810 S NO BID 3 s PAGE 10 UTILITIES SUPKY INC. JOKkR INTERNATIONAL iVW'11?Y11LC V nUV? MiUl13U1V i'7SIUI'IItl M -ry1 We`! iTE UNITPRICE TO LPRICE UNITPRICE YOTA PRICE 1 NO BID 6 - NO 810 s 2 NO BID s - NO 810 s 3 NO BID S NO BID S 4 NO BID 3 NO DID s 5 NO BID S • NO BID 3 - 6 NO BID s - NO DID f - 7 NO BID s - NO BID s - B NO BID 3 NO BID s - 9 NO BID III - NO 810 s - 10 NO BID S - NO BID s - I1 NO BID s - NO BID 3 - 12 NO BID 3 NO BID 3 • s - s - 13 NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 - 14 NO BID 3 NO BID $ 15 NO BID s NO BID 3 - 16 NO 810 ; NO BID $ - 17 NO 010 3 • NO BID 3 - 18 NO BID 3 NO BID s 19 NO BID 3 NO BID s - , 20 NO BID s - NO BID s - 21 NO 010 3 - NO BID s 22 NO BID 3 - NO BID s « ' 23 NO BID s NO Btu $ 24 NO BID S - NO Bt0 S - 25 NO 810 3 NO BIO s s - s - 25 NO 810 $ - NO BID s 27 NO BID s - NO BID s - .' 25 NO BID s - NO BID s - 29 NO BID 3 - NO BID s - 30 NO BID $ NO BID s - NO 810 $ - NO BID 3 - 1 NO BID s - NO BID s - 2 NO BID $ NO BID s s - 3 - 3 NO BID 3 - N081D s - 4 NO BID 3 - NO BID s - 5 NO BID $ NO BID s - 0 NO 810 s - NO BID s - 7 NO BID 5 NO BID s s - s - 39 NO 810 $ - NO BID $ 40 NO BID s - NO 010 $ - 41 NO BID S NO 81D s 42 NO 131D s - NO BID s - 43 NO 131D $ - NO BID s - 44 NO BID $ - NO BID S - 45 NO BID ' • 3 - NO 310 s 46 NO BID s - NO BID 3 47 NO BID $ NO SID s I 48, 3 8.80 s 8,814.00 3 7.41 $ 7,410.00 49 3 1220 3 3,680,00 s 9.79 3 2,937.00 50 $ 16.25 s 3,250.00 3 14.92 $ 2,984 00 51 3 32.00 3 4,600.00 111 29.88 s 4,479.00 $ 20,600.00 3: 17,810.00 ir a:. CITY OF CLEARWATER BID 120.96 PAGE 2 OP 4 ATS INDUSTRIES. INC. AVANTI COM PANY ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY SAFETY HARBOR, LORIDA AVON PART FLORIDA COIMPRESBION COUPLINGS :,2 2 Irr BOLTED COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING CSI E-20OA5-8 12 S 37.05 $ 44460 S 20.05 S 34300 53 2' BOLTED COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING CSI E-28A56 12 S 29.5b S 354.96 S 22.90 S 274.00 1 54 318" X 1M' COPPER TUBE ADAPTER 20 NO DID S - NO DID S 55 314 MPT X518 OD PE WISTIFFENER ADAPTER CONTINENTAL. 0042.00-0913 600 NO BID 3 - S 5.40 $ 3,240.00 66 314 MPT X 518 00 PE WISTIFFENER ADAPTER CONTINENTAL 134040.1004 150 NO BID S $ t5.35 S 2,302.60 57 314" COND. COMPRESSIONCOUPLING DRESSER STYLE DO 175 $ 1308 S 2,209.00 $ 10.15 S 1,778.25 58 1" COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 90 150 S 13.95 S 2,092.50 $ 11.00 $ 1,650.00 59 1 114' COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE DO 40 3 15,11 S 604.40 $ 11.70 $ 46800 60 1 lir COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 90 25 S 1803 S 450.75 3 1195 $ 348.75 61 2" COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 90 100 $ 22.37 3 2,237.00 3 17.30 S 1,730.00 62 1121PS COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 90 40 $ 16.38 S 655.29 $ 12.70 S 508.00 63 314" COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 90 INSULATED 25 S 12.38 3 309.50 3 9.60 $ 240.00 64 1' COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 00 INSULATED 25 S 1297 3 32425 3 10.10 $ 252.50 65 1 114" COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 90 INSULATED 25 S 1464 S 366.00 3 11.40 $ 285.00 66 1 112" COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 90 INSULATED 25 $ 18.24 S 456.00 $ 1415 S 353.75 67 2" COND. COMPRESSION COUPLING DRESSER STYLE 90 INSULATED 25 S 22.94 S 57150 $ 17.75 S 443.75 COMPRESSION COUPLING TOTAL: INCOMPLETE INCOMPLETE ` 0? , VEGAS. STAINLESS STEEL REPAIR CLAMP WITH NEOPRENE SEALING GASKET 60 314"X 3' STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP POWER SEAL STYLE 3151 25 NO BID 3 - $ 10.75 69 1"X 3" STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP POWER SEAL STYLE 3151 12 NO BID S - S 5.25 S 63.00 70 1 1/4'X 12" STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP POWER SEAL STYLE 3151 12 NO BID S - S 25.00 S 300.00 71 1 112' X 3' STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP POWER SEAL STYLE 3151 12 NO BID $ - S 5.75 3 69.00 72 2" X 12' FULL CIRCLE STAIN, STEEL CLAMP 2ZS-2:55 OD POWER SEAL 31100 12 NO BID $ - S 74.00 3 888.00 73 2'X 12' FULL CIRCLE STAIN. STEEL CLAMP 2,452.65 G POWER SEAL 311013 12 NO BID $ - S 74.00 S 880.00 74 2 112"X 12' FULL CIR. STAIN. STEEL CLAMP 2.70.2.DO OD POWER SEAL 31100 12 NO 810 $ - 3 74.00 3 888.00 75 X X 12" FULL CIRCLE STAIN. STEEL CLAMP 3.40-3.60 OD POWER SEAL 3110G 10 NO BID $ S 75.00 S 750.00 76 1 114"X 12' STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP POWER SEAL STYLE 3151 4 NO DID S - $ 25.00 3 100.00 77 1 112" X 3" STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP POWER SEAL STYLE 3151 6 NO BID $ - S 5.75 S 34.50 70 2"X 3" STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP POWER SEAL STYLE 9151 6 NO BID $ S 6.50 S 39.00 70 2' X S" STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP POWER SEAL STYLE 3151 6 NO BID 3 - 6 11.50 i 69.00 80 4"X 12" FULL CIRCLE STAIN. STEEL CLAMP 4.50.4.80 OD POWER SEAL 3110G 6 NO BID $ - $ 92.00 3 552.00 01 0' X 1Y FULL CIRCLE STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP 8,008.25 00 POWER SEAL 311OG 8 NO BID $ - S 147.00 3 1,176.00 S2 S' X 12' FULL CIRCLE STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP 8.60-9.50 POWER SEAL 3122G 3 NO 810 3 S '147.00 S 441.00 VEGAS TOTAL: 3 - $ 6,378.25 SERVICE SADDLES, DOUBLE STEEL STRAP WITH ROLLED THREAD DESIGN CONTAINING A NEOPRENE SEALING GASKET 83 1 Ip$ MAIN X 314 FPT 8 NO BID $ NO BID $ 84 1 114 MAIN X 314 FPT 8 NO 810 $ NO 010 S 05 2 MAIN X 1 FPT 40 NO BID S NO BID S N 2 MAIN X 114 FPT 12 NO BID i NO BID $ 67 2 MAIN X 112 FPT 25 NO BID $ NO 810 S 88 2 MAIN X 1 FPT i5 NO BID S NO DID S 89 4 MAIN X 314 FPT 0 NO BID 3 NO BID S - 00 4 112 MAIN X 2 FPT 0 NO BID i NO DID 3 - 91 3 MAIN X 1 FPT 6 NO BID $ NO BID S 92 2MAINX314FPT 6 NO BID 3 NO BID $ SERVICE SADDLES TOTAL: S - S WIRE 93 0 12 SOLID YELLOW THHN TRACER WIRE !50000 NO DID $ - NO BID $ - 94 010 SOLID YELLOW THHN TRACER WIRE 75000 NO BID S NO BID $ WIRE TOTAL' . $ - $ - 05 1" PUNCH TEE V111" BASE Q 1" OUTLET CONTINENTAL 1416.09.0814 50 NO BID S NO BID $ - 06 SOLID PUNCH 314" PUNCH VALVE SERVICE TEE - 314 WIBASE X 1l2 CTS 60 NO 810 S - NO BID $ - COMP. PE WISTIFFENER PUNCH TEE TOTAL, S S DRESSERS ' 97 3 BOLT COMP. COUPLING 2.500 TO 2.375 30 $ 29.16 $ 1,049.76 22.60 S 813.60 Si0 3 BOLT COMP. COUPLING 2.37$ TO 2.375 36 $ 2883 3 1,037,88 S 22.35 $ 804,60 99 3 BOLT COMP. COUPLING 2.500 TO 2.500 36 S 29.18 $ 1,04976 $ 2260 $ 813.60 100 3BOLT COMP. COUPLING 2.073TO2076 30 S 37.05 S 1,333.00 S 2670 S 1,033.20 101 4 DOLT COMP. COUPLING 4.500 TO 4.600 6 $ 71.49 3 428.94 $ 55.30 S 331.80 102 4 BOLT COMP. COUPLING 4.600 TO 4.500 6 $ 47.61 S 285.66 $ 36 85 S 221A0 103 4 BOLT COMP. COUPLING 4.500 TO 5.ODO 12 S 71.49 $ 057.88 S 55.30 S 663.60 104 6 BOLT COMP. COUPLING 6.750 TO 5.000 3 NO BID 3 - NO BID S - 4 'k 6"r- V DRESSERTOTAL: INCOMPLETE IN COMPLETE iM -?^ IN-LINE INSULATORS 105 UXTERNAL COATE5-2 - 1500 WELE X WELD 2 NO 010 S $ 00 S 220.00 1D6 4" !SON WELD XWELD 2 NO BID S S 275.00 107 W ISM WELO X WELD 2 NO BID S S 460.00 S 920.00 IDS W !SARK WELO X WELD 2 NO BID i - $ 750.00 $ 1,600.00 109 1" 15W WELD X WELD 2 NO BID $ - S 6500 $ 170.00 110 3" 15011 WELD X WELD 2 NO BID 8 S 175.00 S 350.00 f IN-UNE INSULATOR TOTAL: 3 $ 3,71000 PAGE 29 BERT LOWE SUPPLY CO. EMPIRE PIPE A SUPPLY CO. EOUIPMLNT C ONTROLS CO FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. FLA. INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS TAMPA, FLORIDA TAMPA, FLORIDA NORCROSS GEORO PINELLAS PAR FLORIDA TAMPA. FLORIDA 62 NO BID 3 NO 010 S NO 010 S NO BID 3 NO 010 3 - 53 NO BID $ NO 010 3 NO BID f NO 610 $ NO 010 S 54 NO BID 3 NO DID i - NO BID S NO 010 $ S 0 37 $ 7.40 55 NO BID S NO BID S S 4 28 3 2,560 00 NO DID $ NO DID S - 56 NO 810 3 - NO 010 S f 12 85 S 1,92750 NO BID 3 NO 610 3 - 57 NO 810 3 NO BID 3 - NO 010 3 - NO BID $ S 9 966 f 1,74405 56 NO BID 3 NO DID S NO 010 3 NO BID S S 10 824 3 1,62360 59 NO 010 S NO DID S NO BID 3 NO DID $ $ 11.715 $ 46860 60 NO BID 3 NO BID i NO 010 9 NO 1316 S S 14 209 3 35723 61 NO BID $ NO BID 3 NO BID $ NO BID S 3 17.688 S 1,76860 62 NO DID f NO BID 3 - NO BID S - NO BID $ NO 810 3 - 63 NO DID 3 NO BID 3 - NO 810 3 NO BID $ S 11.70 S 292.50 64 NO 01D $ NO DID 3 NO BID 3 NO BID $ 3 12.246 3 305.15 65 NO BID S NO 810 S NO DID i - NO DID $ $ 13.845 3 348.13 86 NO 810 3 NO BID S - NO DID S NO BID • S S 17.236 3 430.95 67 NO BID S ND BID S NO BID 3 NO 1310 3 3 21.664 f 542.10 3 3 INCOMPLETE $ - INCOMPLETE 68 NO BID $ NO BID $ - $ 4.75 $ 118,75 NO BID 3 S 5.744 S 14360 69 NO BID S NO BID 3 - S 525 $ 6300 NO DID 3 - 3 8.062 S 72.74 TO NO 010 S NO DID 3 - 3 23.50 3 262.00 NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 - 71 NO BID S NO BID S - $ 550 $ 60.00 NO BID 3 - 3 7,818 3 93.62 72 NO BID S NO BID $ - $ 4335 $ 520.20 NO BID 3 - S 63.558 S 782.70 73 NO 010 S NO BID $ - 3 4385 3 526.20 NO BID 3 - f 49.20 S 59040 74 NO BID S NO BID $ - 3 45.55 $ 546 80 NO BID 3 - $ 70.82 S 847.44 75 NO 810 i NO BID 3 - $ 4685 3 468.50 NO DID 3 - 3 72.204 f 722.04 78 NO BID 3 NO BID S 3 23.45 i 93.80 NO DID 3 - NO DID S - 77 NO BID $ NO BID S 3 5 55 3 33.90 NO DID S - 3 7.818 f 46.91 78 NO BID $ NO BID 3 3 560 $ 33.60 NO BID S - S 8.297 3 49.78 79 NO BID 3 NO DID 3 - 3 920 3 55.20 NO 010 3 - 3 14 759 S 88.55 DO NO BID 3 NO BID S - $ 5500 3 334.80 NO DID $ - S 9317D S 559.07 61 NO BID 3 NO BID $ 3 77,70 S 621,60 NO 810 S - 5 10000 3 608.40 B2 NO BID f NO BID 3 3 10860 S 325.00 NO DID S $ 10080 $ 302.40 S $ - S 4,DB9.35 $ - INCOMPLETE 83 NO DID S NO 810 3 - NO BID S - NO BID $ NO BID S 84 NO BID f NO BID 3 - NO 010 S - NO DID $ - NO 81D $ - 55 NO BID S NO BID 3 - NO BID S - NO DID S - $ 18.019 3 720.72 06 NO BID S NO BID $ - NO 010 S - NO 010 S - NO BID 3 - 67 NO BID $ NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 - NO 510 $ - $ 1B0116 S 450.45 Be NO BID $ NO BID S - NO BID S - NO DID S - $ 16 018 f 270.27 89 NO BID $ NO BID S NO BID S - NO 010 S - 3 22.044 $ 132.26 90 NO BID $ NO BID S. NO 010 S - NO BID 3 $ 20 229 S 121.37 91 NO BID 3 NO BID S - NO BID S - NO BID S - $ 18711 S 112.27 92 NO BID S NO 010 3 NO BID 3 NO BID S S 18 018 $ 108.11 $ S • 3 - S - INCOMPLETE 93 NO DID 3 NO DID S S 00598 f 8,97000 NO 010 i 3 0059 3 8,850.00 94 NO 810 S NO BID $ S 0.0918 S 6.87000 NO 010 3 3 0.092 S 6,900.00 S S - S 15,840.00 3 - S 15,750.00 95 NO BID $ NO 010 S - 3 2060 S 1,030.00 NO 010 $ - $ 29.40 S 1,47000 96 NO BID S NO DID S - f 1395 S 897.60 , NO 010 3 - S 1980 3 990.00 a 3 S - $ •-? ' 1,727.50 ` S $ 2,460.00 97 NO DID $ NO BID S NO BID 3 - NO BID S $ 2333 S 839,88 96 NO BID 3 NO BID $ - NO BID S - NO BID $ - $ 262B $ 81008 99 NO 810 S NO BID S NO BID S - NO BID 3 - S 23.10 3 831.80 100 NO 010 3 NO BID f NO BID 3 - NO BID S - S 29.83 S 1,06668 101 NO BID 3 NO BID f NO BID S - NO BID $ - $ 46.80 S 280.80 102 NO 1110 $ - NO BID $ NO BID S - NO 010 3 - 3 41.25 $ 247.50 103 NO BID S NO 010 S - NO 010 S - NO BID S - $ 561.60 104 NO BID $ NO BID 3 NO DID S NO BID S S ..110.40 S - S - S 3 - 5,069.34 105 NO BID f NO BID 3 - NO BIO i - NO 810 3 - S 182.02 3 36564 106 NO BID S - NO DID 3 - NO BID S - NO DID f - $ 415.00 f 830.16 107 NO BID S - NO BID 3 - NO BID $ - NO 1310 S - S 797.70 i 1,59540 100 NO BED 3 - NO 010 $ - NO BID $ - NO BID 3 - $ 1,208.76 3 2,417.52 109 NO BID III - NO BID S - NO BID $ - NO 810 3 - 3 151.66 S 303.72 110 NO BID S NO BID 3 NO BID i NO BID $ $ 277.14 f 554 26 3 S - $ - S - 3 8,066.72 a': 1:, PAGE 2C HUGHES SUPPLY INC. M.T, DEASON COMPANY MYLON C. JACOBS SUPPLY PEERLESS SUPPLY, INC, STUART STEEL PROTECTION tLEARWATER. FLORIDA BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA BROKEN ARROW OKLAHOMA CLEARWATER FLORIDA SOUTH BOUND_ BROOK NJ 62 $ 27.44 $ =20 s 4027 S 48324 NO DID 53 s 21.92 3 26304 $ 3432 3 411.84 NO BID 54 NO BID 3 - NO 010 3 - NO BID 55 NO BID 3 - s 3.76 9 2,258.00 NO DID Be NO BID 3 - S 1565 s 2,377.50 NO Bf0 57 $ 9.3a 3 1,641.50 3 1585 S 2,773.75 NO 010 Sa $ 10.00 3 1,500.00 3 1890 $ 2,53500 NO BID 69 s 11.19 s 447.80 3 18.30 3 732.00 NO BID 60 s 113.35 S 3:315 $ 21.65 S 548.25 NO BID 61 S 16.03 3 1,803.00 3 27.10 3 2,710.00 NO DID 62 $ 12.13 3 45520 3 14.40 s 576 DO NO DID 03 3 9.16 s 229.00 S 15.00 s 375.00 NO BID 64 s 9.60 3 240.00 s 15.70 S 392.50 NO BID 65 s 1084 3 271.00 S 17,75 S 443.75 NO BID 66 3 13.61 S 337,75 s 22.00 S 550.00 NO BID 67 s 16.99 3 42460 3 27,80 3 695.00 NO BID INCOMPLETE 1 17,857.83 65 NO BID s - 3 2.74 S 68.50 NO BID 69 NO BID s - 3 3 07 $ 36.84 NO Bf0 70 NO BID 3 - 3 17.74 S 212.88 NO BID 71 NO BID S S 3.65 f 4380 NO 810 72 NO BID 3 - 3 35.37 3 424.44 NO BID 73 NO BID s 3 35.37 3 424.44 NO BID 74 NO BID S S 37.98 S 455.78 NO 010 75 NO BID S - 3 42.45 3 424.50 NO BID 76 NO BID $ - 3 17.74 $ 7096 NO BID 77 NO BID S - s 3.65 S 21.90 NO BID T6 NO BID S - $ 4.79 $ 26.74 NO DID T9 NO BID 3 - 3 25.93 S 155.58 NO BID 80 NO BID s 3 4877 3 292.62 NO DID 81 NO BID $ - s 68.64 $ 549.12 NO BID 82 NO BID S s 69.17 S 207.51 NO BID S 9 3,417.59 AA 53 NO BID s - S 11.58 s 69.48 NO DID 34 NO DID 1 - i 17,41 3 104.46 NO DID 05 NO BID 3 - s 17.49 S 69960 NO 010 86 NO BID 3 3 17.49 s 209.66 NO BID aT NO BID s x 17.49 S 437.25 NO 010 as NO DID 3 - S 17.49 3 26235 NO BID 09 NO DID 3 - $ 24.55 3 147.30 NO DID 90 NO BID s 3 24,55 3 147.30 NO BID 91 NO BID s - S 21.74 $ 13044 NO BID 02 NO BID 3 $ 17.49 s 1(4.94 NO BID S S 2,31300 93 s 0.0388 S 5,820.00 S 0.05 3 7,500 DO NO BID 94 3 0.06065 5 4 6 63 75 $ 0.076 $ 6AM 00 NO BID - . - ± 66 - 1 ,; 175?? 3 13,35000 95 NO 010 3 NO BID $ NO BID so NO BID $ NO BID 3 NO BID s 3 - s 3 i S i S 3 s s a s a S s s x s s 3 s s s S s s S s i - NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 NO BID S - NO BID 3 - NO DID s - NO BID 3 - s 498 s 2,98000 NO DID 3 - s 14 22 f 2,133 00 NO BID s - NO BID s - NO BID s - NO 010 S NO BID s NO DID s - NO DID 3 NO BID s - NO BID $ NO BID s NO DID $ NO DID s • NO BID $ NO BID S NO BID $ NO DID s - NO 040 s NO BID s - NO DID - $ NO BID s - NO DID - $ NO BID s NO BID 3 INCOMPLETE 3 - NO BID $ - NO BID - $ • NO BID s NO DID s - - NO BID s NO 010 s - • NO BID s NO 010 3 - NO BID s NO BID 3 - - NO BID 3 NO BID $ - - No BID 3 NO BID 3 - NO Bfo s NO Bfo s - - NO BID s NO BID s - - NO Bit) $ NO BID 6 - - NO BID 3 NO BID 3 - NO BID s NO BID s - NO BID 3 NO BID s - - NO BID s NO BID 3 NO BID S NO 010 $ NO DID $ NO BID s - - NO BID 3 NO BID S - - NO BID 3 - NO BID f - - NO BID 3 - NO 131D s - - NO BID s - NO BID s - • NO DID 3 - NO BID S - • NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 • NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 NO BID 3 - NO BID s NO BID 3 NO DID $ _ s s 3 - s - S - S - 97 s 20.90 S 752,40 $ 55.89 $ 2,012.04 NO BID I - D6 s 20.67 3 744.12 $ 2066 3 743.76 NO BID 3 - as 3 20.90 3 752.40 s 21.19 i 76264 NO BID 3 100 $ 26.38 3 95x.16 s 25.23 S 908.28 NO BID s - 101 s 51.80 s 310.50 s 68.86 s 401.16 NO BID - $ 102 S 34.50 S 207.00 s 31,14 S 18054 NO DID s 103 $ 51.25 S 51500 NO BID s - NO DID s 104 NO BID $ NO BID S NO 010 s INCOMPLETE INCOMPLETE 3 105 NO BID 3 s 10650 3 108 NO BID 1 s 256.45 s 107 NO 810 s $ 492.38 3 106 NO 810 3 3 754.00 S 109 NO BID 3 3 as 78 $ 110 NO BID S t 15855 3 s - : 217.00 512.90 964.76 1,508 00 177.58 337.16 3,737.30 NO BID ND BID s s s 23.70 3 1.16500 s 15.95 s 798.00 3 1,963 OO NO BID s NO 010 3 NO BID $ NO BID s NO BID $ NO BID s NO BID $ NO BID 3 s - NO BID s NO BID $ NO BID S NO BID s NO BID S NO 010 s NO BID 3 NO 010 s NO 810 s NO BID s NO 010 s NO DID s 3 0.09 3 13,500.00 $ 0.13 3 9.750.00 3 23,250.00 NO B10 NO BID s 3 - NO BID s NO BID s - NO BID 3 NO BID 3 - NO BID s - NO BID $ NO 010 3 NO 010 s s - 3 15300 S 30600 S 361.00 S 722.00 $ 82000 S 1,24000 $ I.W5 00 S 2,01000 3 10600 i 21100 s 245.00 S 490.00 $ 4,960.00 PAG! 21) UTILITIES SUPPLY INC. LOOANVILLE GEOFIGIA 52 3 3300 s 390.00 53 S 20.30 s 315.80 54 NO BID S - 55 s 5.00 S 3,000 00 66 s 13.60 s 2,040.00 67 s 11.63 s 2,035.25 56 s 12.40 $ 1,660.00 59 3 13.43 $ 537.20 60 i 1803 S 400.75 61 $ 19,65 $ 1,965.00 62 $ 14.56 3 552.40 63 s 11,00 s 275.00 64 i 11.55 $ 208.75 65 s 13.00 S 325.00 68 3 1620 s 405.00 67 3 20.35 $ 506.75 INCOMPLETE 5 68 $ 5.30 s 132.50 69 s 5.75 t 69.00 70 3 23.00 $ 278.00 71 3 6.35 $ 76.20 72 S ' 46.45 $ 557.40 73 NO BID 3 - T4 3 49.20 3 590.40 75 s 56.00 $ 660.00 76 s 23.00 3 92.00 77 $ 6,35 s .38.10 Te $ 6.80 3 41.40 79 $ 12.60 6 75.60 60 $ 6600 s 388.00 61 i 08.00 S 784.00 172 $ 130.00 s 390.00 ' INCOMPLETE JOMAR INTERNATIONAL MADISON HEIGHTS. MICHIGAN NO BID 3 - NO 010 3 - NO BID 3 - NO 810 3 NO BID S NO BID s NO BID $ NO 010 3 NO BID s NO DID S NO BID - $ NO 010 3 - NO BID S NO BID $ NO BID s - NO BID 3 s - NO BID s NO BID s NO 010 3 NO BID s NO 010 $ NO 810 S NO BID $ NO BID 3 NO 810 s NO BID s NO BID s NO BID s NO BID s NO BID s NO BID s S 03 $ 9.54 3 57.24 64 s 13.85 $ 53.16 65 3 '14.77 3 590.80 66 s 14.21 i 170.52 67 $ 14.21 $ 35525 88 3 1477 $ 221.55 69 s 31.73 $ 190.36 90 i 31.73 S 190.36 91 S 17.75 3 104.10 92 s 14177 3 68.62 gL'`s:? 12,052.00 \1? -4 93 NO BID 84 NO BID S ' s 95 i 23.25 S 1,162.50 96 3 15.50 S 775.00 i 1,937.50 97 s 25.00 3 900.00 96 3 24.75 $ 891.00 99 s 25.00 3 900.00 too 3 32.00 3 1.152.D0 101 $ 64.00 3 384.00 102 i 42.00 s 252.00 103 $ 64.00 3 766.00 104 NO 810 s INCOMPLETE 105 NO BID 3 . - 109 NO BID s - 107 NO BID s 108 NO BID $ - 109 NO BID 6 - 110 NO BID s ;r NO BID S NO BID i NO BID S NO 810 3 NO 010 3 NO BID 3 NO 010 s NO BID s NO 010. s NO BID $ s NO BID s NO BID 3 S NO BID s NO BID 3 s NO BID $ NO BID $ NO BID $I NO 010 $ NO 810 s NO SID S NO BID 3 NO 810 s s NO BID s NO BID s NO BID s NO BID $ NO BID I NO BID S 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER DID 120•96 PAGE 3 OF 4 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION VALVES, NATURAL OAS lit 2" ROCKWELL 143 FLANGED 112 4' ROCKWELL 113 W ROCKWELL 114 W ROCKWELL 115 2'ROCKWELLVVELD 1t8 4'ROCKVdELL 117 6"ROCKWELL 115 Er ROCKWELL VALVES, NATURAL GAS TOTAL: MISCELLANEOUS PARTS 118 2"E NEOPRENE FLANGE GASKETS 120 3' E NEOPRENE FLANGE GASKETS 121 4"E NEOPRENE FLANGE GASKETS 122 8' E NEOPRENE FLANGE GASKETS 123 8' E NEOPRENE FLANGE GASKETS 124 2" TAPECOAT COLD CT 35 TAPE (NOT GREENLINE) 125 4" TAPECOAT COLD CT 35 TAPE (NOT GREENLINE) 128 ROYSTON R28 MASTIC 127 2 X 18 CANUSA PL-55.10 SHRINK SLEEVES 128 4 X 16 CANUSA PLA 15.15 129 S X 16 CANUSA PL-170.18 130 S X 18 SHRINK SLEVES 131 (SLIDS) SUPPORT CLAMPS 12' X V 132 (SUDS)SUPPORT CLAMPS IYX6- 133 2 X SW W (STIFFENER. STEEL WRAP-A-ROUND TAP TEE s1302.17.1004 134 1 X 618' WPSTIFFENER, STEEL WRAP,A-ROUND TAP TEE 01302.14.1004 135 1 114 X 518' WISTIFFENER. STEEL WRAP-A ROUND TAP TEE 01302.15.1004 138 314 X 5I8' WISTIFFENER, STEEL WRAP-A ROUND TAP TEE 111302-14.10D4A ITEMS BELOW MUST BE MADE FROM DOMESTIC PIPE 137 314' 1A MPT GMI METER SWIVEL ` 135 314" 1A MPT INSULATED METER SWIVEL 139 314' 1A GMI METER NUTS 14D 314' 1A FEMALE INSULATED METER SPUD 141 314" to FEMALE NON-INSULATED METER SPUD MISCELLANEOUS PARTS TOTAL: ATS INDUSTRIES, INC. AVANTI COMPANY QUANTITY SAFETY HARBOR. FLORIDA AVON PAR FLORIDA 20 S 92.49 S 1,849,80 S 72.30 S 1.448.00 10 i 207.33 S 2,073.30 S 165.00 S 1,65000 8 S 553.11 S 4,424.88 S 495.00 S 3,990.00 10 $ MAII S 9,964.80 S 2,995.00 S 20,950 00 10 3 251.36 S 2,513,60 S 165.00 S 1,85000 10 S 410 21 S 4,102.10 S 330.00 S 3,300.00 8 S 1,552.13 S 12,417.04 S 1,080.00 $ 8,840.00 S 2,104.59 S 8,41836 $ 2,270.00 S 9.00000 S 46,763 S 58,878.00 100 S 0.75 S 75.00 $ 1.00 S 100.00 20 S 1.22 S 24.40 S 1.60 S 32.00 100 S 1.69 S 16900 $ 2.25 S 225.00 80 $ 2.81 S 22480 $ 2.75 3 220.00 50 S 4.13 $ 208.50 i 4,75 3 237.50 240 ND BID $ - S 99 NO BID $ - S - 60 NO 010 S - S - 12 NO 010 S - S _ 12 NO DID S S 12 NO DID $ - S 12 NOBID $ $ 100 NO BID S 100 NO BID S - S 70 NO 010 S - 5 40.65 S 2,845.50 36 NO BID S - S 40.65 $ 1,463,40 36 NO BID S - S 4065 $ 1,483.40 24 NO DID S - $ 49.75 $ 1,194.00 100 NO BID 3 - S 1.18 $ '118.00 500 NO BID S - 3 2.25 , _ . . I,125.00 600 NO BID S - S 0.64 S ' ' 504.00 ? 1000 NO BID S - 3 -.2.50. S £. ' 2,50Q00 , • ? 250 NO BID $ S 0,54 '3 210.00;1 INCOMPLETE INCOMPLETE ADDITIONAL ITEMS NEOPRENE FACED PHENOLIC GASKET 142 TYPE E, 150 SIZE 2" 60 S 8.72 S 523.20 S 0.50 i 390.00 143 TYPE E, 150 SIZE 3" 50 $ 11.87 $ 593.50 S 8.50 S 425.00. 144 TYPE E, 150 SIZE 4" 80 $ 1607 $ 964.20 S 11.50 S 690.00 145 TYPE E. 150 SIZE 9" 50 $ 21.17 $ 1.058.50 $ 15.50 S 775.00 148 518'X4-ALL-THREAD STUDS (DEBORED) 1000 S 1.65 $ 1.650.00 S 0.55 S 550.00 147 618" NUTS 2000 $ 019 $ 20000 $ 0.20 S 400.00 148 3M-X4'ALL-THREAD STUDS (DEBORED) 300 $ 2.03 S 600.00 $ 0.75 i 225.00 149 314"NUTS 600 $ 0.15 S 90.00 $ 0.25 S 150.00 150 CATHODIC TEST STATIONS WITH CAST IRON RING 350 NO 010 $ - NO BID $ 151 3M DIRECT BARIAL SPLICE KITS 500 NO BID S NO BID S PHENOLIC GASKET TOTAL: INCOMPLETE INCOMPLETE EUMINATORS 652 TIPS -X &B CTS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING IMTN PE S7IFFENER 1D NO BID $ - NO BID S - 153 1 IPS X I IPS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING NTH PE STIFFENER 5 NO BID S - NO DID 3 154 1 114 IPS X 518 CTS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING WITH PE STIFFENER 10 NO BID i - NO BID S - 155 1 114 IPS X 1 IPS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING WITH PE STIFFENER 5 NO BID $ - NO BID S - 158 21PS SM CTS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING WITH PE STIFFENER 10 NO BID i NO BID i - 157 21PS X 1 IPS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING WITH PE STIFFENER 10 NO BID S NO BID S 155 2 IPS X 1 114 IPS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING WITH PE STIFFENER 5 NO BID S - NO BID S 159 4 IPS X 518 CTS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING WITH PE STIFFENER 5 NO BID 3 - NO BID S 160 4 IPS X 2 LIPS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING NTH PE STIFFENER 5 NO BID S - NO BID $ - 161 6 IPS X 21PS PLASTIC COMPRESSION COUPLING WITH PE STIFFENER 5 NO BID S NO BID S WMIHATORS TOTAL: i - S . PIGS: FOAM PIPEUNG CLEANERS 192 1' IPS 10 NO BID I NO BID S - 167 rips 30 NO BID S 10.00 S 30000 184 4'1PS 14 NO SID S S 15.00 $ 15000 PIGS: FOAM PIPELINE CLEANER TOTAL: 5 INCOMPLETE T D NALUAMSON 185 2-TEE (LOW PRESSURE) 30 NO BID S - NO BID $ - IW 2-TEE (HIGH PRESSURE) 30 NO BID $ - NO BID $ - 167 W TEE (HIGH PRESSURE) 5 NO BID S - NO BID S - 168 4- TEE (HIGH PRESSURE) 5 NO BID S NO BID i - 160 6-TEE (HIGH PRESSURE) 5 NO BID S NO 810 S 170 8-TEE (HIGH PRESSURE) 6 NO BID $ - NO BID i - I71 2" SHORT STOP 12 NO BID $ NO BID S - 172 W SHORT STOP 5 NO 010 S - NO DID S - 173 4' SHORT STOP 5 NO DID S - NO BID S 174 W SHORT STOP 5 NO 810 S - NO BID $ 175 B' SHORT STOP 5 NO BID $ NO BID $ TOTAL T D VILLIAMSONI $ $ PAGE 30 BERT LOVrE SUPPLY CO. EMPIRE PIPE 3 SUPPLY CO. EQUIPMENT CONTROLS CO. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. FLA. INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS TAMP FLORIDA TAMPA, FLORIDh NORCROSS, GEORGIA PINELLAS PARK FLORIDA TAMPA. FLORIDA 111 NO BID 3 NO BID I S 82,0 S 1,650 00 NO 910 3 S 91.40 S 1,945.00 112 NO BID 3 NO BID S - 3 15590 3 1,05900 NO BID 3 - 3 241.02 f 2,410.20 113 NO 810 S - NO BID S - 3 12415 S 99500 NO DID 3 S 806.40 S 6,451.20 114 NO BID S NO BID S - S 912.50 3 9,125 00 NO DID f • 3 1,08864 S 10,680 40 115 NO DID S - NO 810 i - NO DID 3 - NO BID S - S 260.11 S, 2,661.10 116 NO 010 S - NO BID 3 - NO BID S - NO BID f - S 430 82 3 4,386.20 117 140810 3 - NO 010 S - NO BID f NO BID S - 3 1,56576 S 12,526.06 110 NO BID S NO DID S NO 010 3 NO 810 f S 7,197.44 SS 8,789.78 $ S INCOMPLETE S S 60,06094 119 NO 010 i NO 810 3 NO BID 3 - NO BID S 3 0 636 S 6360 120 NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 NO DID 3 - NO BID 3 f 0 972 S 19.44 121 NO 91D $ - NO BID S - NO BID 3 NO BID $ - 3 1.358 f 13560 122 NO BID $ - NO BID S NO BID 3 - NO BID S $ 1.708 S 143,04 r? 123 NO BID f - NO 131D 3 NO BID S NO DID S S 2.40 S 12000 1 1?4 NO BID S NO BID i - NO DID I - NO BID 3 - 3 8.49 i 1,557.60, 125 NO 510 S - NO 010 S - NO DID S - NO BID S - S 13,37 S L? ` 1,283.52'1 126 127 NO BID NO BID 3 $ NO BID S 7.00 3 S 84.00 f 2300 NO BID 3 1,912.00 3 NO BID NO 910 S - S - S 17.52 NO 810 S 3 ( 1,401.60 d 125 NO BID 3 - S 1000 f 120.00 NO 010 S - NO BID S - NO BID S - 129 NO BID S 3 1200 S 144.D0 NO BID $ - NO BID 3 NO BID 3 130 NO BID 3 - S 15.00 S 160.00 NO 603 3 NO BID S - NO 010 S - 131 NO BID S - NO 010 3 - f IM35 3 • ' 1,035.D0 ; NO BID S - NO BID S 132 NO BID $ - NO 010 f - S = 6 513,, iei,0:O4 NO 510 S - NO BID 3 - 133 NO 810 i - NO BID S i ?3? } i 1. 2,274.00 I NO BI0 f - 3 46.20 S 3,23400 131 NO BID S - NOpEO S - 3 1 s -;,2Sd' 1,17000" NO BID $ 3 46.20 S 1,66320 135 NO BID $ - NO 810 S - S -,,3150 - 4 ^- 1,17QoD P NO 010 S - S 46.20 S 1,663.20 136 NO BID $ - NO 810 S - S 3560 i 87 A$ NO BID $ ! 4820 S 1,108.50 $ I 137 NO DID S - NO BID $ - $ 2.30 S 230.00 NO 810 S - NO BID S - 138 NO BID i - NO 010 i S 3.60 i 1,800.00 NO BID $ - NO BID S - 139 NO BID i NO BID 3 S 1.50 3 900 00 NO DID S - NO BED 3 - 140 NO BED S NO BID S - S 4,60 3 4,600.00 NO BID $ - NO BID S - 141 NO DID $ NO BID i 3 4.90 S 1,225.00 NO DID S NO BID 3 $ INCOMPLETE INCOMPLETE $ INCOMPLETE • QTY CONVERTED TO BID REOUIREMENT SEE REQ QTY ON BID RESPONSE FORM 142 NO BID i NO BID S - S 5.30 S 316.00 NO BID 3 $ 4.296 S 257.76 143 NO BID 3 NO BID 3 - 3 6.85 i 342.50 NO BID S - S 580 S 290.40 144 NO BID S NO BID i - 3 9.30 S 556.00 NO BID S S 7.98 $ 470 80 145 NO BID S NO DID $ - S 12.20 3 61D.00 NO BID S 3 10.98 $ 54900 148 NO BID S NO DID S - NO 510 S NO DID 3 - f 0.312 i 312.00 147 NO BID S NO BID i NO BID S NO 910 S - S 0.059 S 11800 148 NO DO S NO BID III - NO 1310 S NO BID t $ 0.432 S 12960 149 NO SID III NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 NO BID S S 0 091 S 54.60 150 NO BID 3 NO BID S S 12.95 S 4,5922.50 NO BID S NO BID S - 151 NO BID 3 NO BID S 3 0.95 3 475.00 NO BID S NO BID S 3 S - INCOMPLETE 3 - INCOMPLETE 152 NO BID S NO SID S $ 22.70 S 227.00 NO BID S - S 31.74 $ 317.40 153 NO BID 3 NO BID 3 - S 20.70 3 143.50 NO BID S S 40.08 3 200 40 154 NO BID 3 NO BI0 S $ 20.05 3 20050 NO BID S - $ 27.98 S 279 60 155 NO SID 3 NO BED 3 - 3 26.10 S 13050 NO 810 3 - S 36.42 S 182.10 156 NO BID 3 NO 010 $ S 17.80 3 17000 NO BID $ - 3 2464 S 248.40 157 NO BID $ NO 010 3 - S 2380 S 23800 NO BID 3 3 33.24 $ 33240 158 NO DID S NO 010 S - S 90.00 3 45000 NO BID 3 - $ 12540 i 627.00 159 NO BID S NO BID S 3 27.30 S 13850 NO BID S $ 3816 $ 190 SO 160 NO 810 3 - NO DID 3 S 99.00 S 49500 NO BID S - $ 13692 i 604.60 161 NO BID S NO BID 3 3 104.15 S 52075 NO DID $ 3 145.56 3 727.50 S - S S: 2,719.76 h S S 3,79050 ? 162 NO BID $ NO 010 3 S 5.00 S 5000 NO BID S - $ 5.76 3 57.60 163 NO BID S NO BID III 3 5.00 f 15000 NO BID S - S 564 S 25920 164 NO OR) S 140510 S f 650 3 8500 NO BID $ 3 1584 S 15840 $ • i 24500,14 `4, ;:7 f S 47520 • 1 105 NO DID 3 NO 010 $ - NO DID 3 NO BID 3 - NO BID f 164 NO BID 3 NO DID $ - NO 010 S - NO DID 3 - NO DID 3 - 147 NO DID 3 NO BID i NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 - NO BID S 168 NO DID S NO 610 S - NO 010 S NO BID S NO BID 3 1L'9 2•'O BID 3 - NO 813 5 NO RID S NO BID S - NO 810 3 - 170 NO 010 3 NO 810 3 NO DID S NO BID 3 NU tl1U 3 - 171 NO BID S NO 810 f NO DID f NO 810 $ - NO 810 3 - 172 NO BID 3 NO DID $ NO BID i NO BID 3 NO 1310 $ 173 NO BID 3 NO BID S NO BID i - NO BID 3 NO BID $ 474 NO 810 f NO 510 3 - NO BID i - NO BIO S Na 810 $ 173 NO BID 3 NO DID 5 NO DID S NO DID 5 NO DID 3 PAGE 3C HUGHES SUPPLY INC. M T. DEASON COMPANY MYLON C. JACOBS SUPPLY PEERLESS SUPPLY, INC. STUART STEEL PROTECTION CLEARWATER, FLORIDA BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA BROKEN ARROW?OKLAHOMA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SOUTH BOUND BROO NJ 111 NO BID S NO BID $ - 3 1,52 2 NO BID S NO BID S 112 NO BID $ NO BID $ 3 NO BID s NO BID 3 113 NO BID $ - NO DID $ - s S 00 NO BID S NO BID 3 114 NO 810 s - NO BID s - s .288.00 NO BID 3 - NO BID s 115 NO BID S - s 164 00 s 1.640.00 3 .32 2,08320 NO 810 S - NO BID s - 116 NO BID s - S 30050 S 3,005.00 3 343,28 432 00 NO 810 3 NO 010 3 117 NO OLD S - S 877.27 S 7,016.18 S 1,107 $ 9, 60 NO 019 3 NO BID 3 118 NO 010 3 S 1,907.50 S 7,630.00 S 1, .80 3 0 675 NO BID S NO BID S 3 - INCOMPLETE 3 36,672.00 3 3 - F BROKEN A17ROW,OK 119 NO BID $ - NO DID s NO BID 3 - NO BID $ - 3 0.53 „i 63.00 120 NO BID 3 - NO BID S N0810 $ - NO 910 $ - S 076` i } ` 100 121 NO BID i NO 010 $ - NO BID $ NO 010 3 - f X1,00' s SOO.OOI 122 NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 - NO BID S NO BID 3 f );.1.'13A 5, 123 NO 810 3 - NO BID 3 - NO 810 $ NO BID s - S 1200 i. .100.00 124 NO 010 s - NO BID S NO BID s - NO 010 S - s 719 s 1,669.60 125 NO BID $ NO 810 3 NO BID 3 - NO BID S s 13.18 S 1,285.28 -? 128 NO BID s $ 16,75 s 1,340.00 NO DID $ - NO BID 3 3 127 NO BID s 3 ' 500,- i'.,I 60.0??' NO BID S - NO BID S - $ 650 $ 78.00 128 NO DID S • s 'i Be01?S :1.? 98.00 NO BID S NO BID $ $ 9.70 3 116.40 129 NO BID $ $ '.11 1.43;; ?. f? 03T.16' NO 810 $ - NO 010 $ - 3 11.90 $ 14200 130 NO BID s - 3 -114.67 170. lp NO DID $ - NO BID $ $ 13.10 $ 157120 131 NO BID $ - NO BID• S NO BID S - NO BID S NO BID 3 - 132 NO DID s - NO BID 3 - NO BID S - NO BID s NO BID $ - 133 NO BID $ - NO BID S - NO BID 3 $ 37.20 i 2,604.06 NO BID s - 134 NO BID S - NO BID 3 - NO DID S - 3 37.20 S 1,339.20 NO DID s - 135 NO BID 3 NO 810 3 - NO BID, S 3 37.20 3 1,33920 NO DID 3 - 136 NO 010 $ NO 010 s - NO BID 3 - 3 41.04 3 98496 NO BID 3 - 137 NO BID s - S 1.50 3 150.00 NO 010 $ - NO BID s - NO BID 3 - 138 NO 010 S - $ 2.95 $ 1,475.00 NO BID S - NO BID 3 - NO BID S - 139 NO BID 3 - 3 0 87 3 522.00 NO BID 3 - NO BID $ - NO BID S - - 140 NO BID 5 3 3,15 S 3,150.00 NO BID 3 - NO BID $ - NO BID $ 141 NO 810 S $ 089 S 222.50 NO BID $ NO BID $ NO BID s s • 3 7,331.10 3 - INCOMPLETE INCOMPLETE 142 NO BID 3 - s 3 97 S 238.20 NO BID S - NO 1310 3 3 6.73 S 403.80 143 NO BID s - s 5.41 S 270.50 NO BID s NO 131D 3 - 3 9.16 $ 458.00 144 NO BID s s 6.90 S 414.00 NO BID $ NO BID $ - $ 12.41 S 744.60 145 NO BID 3 - s 9.09 S 454.50 NO DID $ NO BID S - s 1636 S 61000 148 NO DID S - $ 2.08 3 2,080.00 NO BID $ - NO BID $ - NO DID S 147 NO 810 3 - $ 0 21 S 420.00 NO DID s - NO BID S NO BID S - 148 NO BID $ - 3 1.65 S 495.00 NO 81D s NO DID $ - NO BID s - 149 NO BID s - S 0.38 3 228 00 NO BID S - NO 810 3 - NO BID S 150 NO 010 S S 13 74 3 4.W9 00 NO BID S - NO DID 3 3 15.05 $ 5,617.50 151 3 0.59 S 295.00 S 0.675 3 337.50 NO BID S NO 010 s 3 1115 3 575.00 INCOMPLETE i 9,744.70 S S - INCOMPLETE 152 NO BID S - NO 810 $ NO DID $ - $ 25.58 3 25560 NO 810 S - 153 NO BID 3 - NO OLD 3 NO BID 3 - S 3218 3 161.40 NO 810 S - 154 NO BID S - NO BID S NO BID S - $ 22.55 3 22560 NO DID S - 155 NO BID $ - NO 810 $ NO BID f $ 29.34 3 146.70 NO BID 3 - 158 NO BID 3 - NO BID $ - NO BID s - S 2O 04 3 200.40 NO DID S 157 NO BID S NO O10 $ NO BID S - s 26.76 5 267.60 NO DID s 158 NO BID s - NO 0I0 5 - NO BID S s 100.96 3 504.90 NO DID s 159 NO BID 3 NO 810 S • NO BID S - $ 30.72 3 15360 NO BI0 $ 160 NO BID 3 NO OD S NO BID S - S 110.22 S 551.10 NO BID $ 181 NO BID $ NO DID 3 NO BID 3 S 117.18 S 585.90 NO BID S 3 - S S - 3 3,052.60 s - 162 NO BID 3 - NO BID S NO BID s - NO DID 3 3 7100 3 7000 163 NO 010 S 3 11.00 $ 33000 NO BID 3 - NO BID S - s 7.00 S 21000 164 NO 010 S S 1600 3 16000 NO BID s NO BID S $ 9.00 3 9000 j7 - s 490.00 3 - S - 3 370.00 - 165 NO BID s - $ 98 DO 3 2,94000 NO BID 3 NO BID S NO 810 $ 166 NO DID s - 3 162.00 3 4,060.00 NO BID 3 NO 010 $ NO BID 3 - 167 NO BID $ 3 208.00 3 1,04000 NO BID 3 - NO DID s - NO DID s 168 NO BID i - $ 335.00 3 1.675.00 NO BID $ NO BID $ - NO 010 S - 189 NO BID i - s 571.00 3 2,855 00 NO BID 3 NO BID 3 - NO DID $ 170 NO BID S - 3 1,012.00 3 5.060.00 NO BID S NO810 s - NO BID S - 171 NO BID 3 - i 4600 S 552.00 NO BID 3 NO BID $ - NO BID 3 - 172 NO BID s s 87.00 3 43500 NO BID 3 - NO BID S NO BID $ 173 NO BID s - 5 24600 3 1,230 00 NO BID $ - NO BID $ - NO BID s 174 NO DID $ s 39900 S 1199500 NO BID 5 NO BID S - NO 010 s - 175 NO DID $ i 70200 S 3,51000 4 NO DID III NO 010 S NO 010 3 s • :?1?? ` i . 24.102.00' ? 3 s i - k0l 30 ' UTILITIES S UPP LY INC. JOMAR INTERNATIONAL LOGANVILLE, GEORGIA MADISON HEIGHTS. MICHIGAN 111 3 109.00 6 2.18000 NO BID s - ' 112 3 245.00 3 2,450.00 NO BID s - 113 3 976.00 S 71806.00 NO BID 3 - . 114 3 1.164.00 s 11,640.00 NO 010 i - 115 S 320.00 3 3,20000 NO BID s - 116 s 490.00 3 4,900.00 NO 810 s - 117 S 1,600.D0 $ 12,600.00 NO 010 3 - 118 S 2,200,00 S 6,800.D0 NO BID S 3 53,97600 3 - 119 NO BID $ NO BID S - 120 NO BID S NO BID i 121 NO BID 3 - NO BID S - 122 NO BID s - NO BID $ 123 NO BID 3 NO 010 3 124 NO DID 3 - NO DID S 125 NO 810 s - NO BID $- 128 NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 - 127 NO BID 3 NO 010 S - ' 126 NO 010 3 - NO 810 s - 129 NO BID $ - NO BID $ 130. NO BID i - NO 010 3 5 131 NO BID $ • NO DID s - 132 NO BID $ - NO 010 S - 133 3 37.00 3 2,590,00 NO BID i 134 3 37.00 s 1,332.00 NO BID 3 - 135 $ 37.00 3 1,332.00 NO BID 3 - 136 s 40.69 s 976.56 NO BID S - 137 NO BID 3 - NO BID $ 138 NO 810 3 NO BID i - ' 139 NO BID 3 - NO BID - $ 140 NO BID 3 - NO SID S - 141 NO BID 3 NO BID $ ' INCOMPLETE s - 142 NO B1Q 3 • NO BID 3 143 NO Blp S NO BID 3 144 NO BID $ - NO BID 3 I46 NO BID $ - NO DID s 146 NO BID s - NO BID 3 147 NO BID s - NO BID 3 146 NO BID 1 - NO BID 3 149 NO BID 3 - NO 810 1 - ' 150 NO DID 1 NO BID 3 - 151 NO BID s NO BID S 3 3 . 152 s 24.75 3 247.50 NO BID 3 - 153 3 34.00 i 170.00 NO 010 i - ' 154 3 23.65 3 238.50 NO 131D 3 - 155 3 31.00 3 155.00 NO BID 3 - 156 3 21.50 $ 215.00 NO BID 3 - 157 3 28.30 $ 283.0 NO BID 3 - t5B 6 108.00 5 530.00 NO BID s ' 156 $ .3250 3 162.50 NO BID 3 - 150 3 11600 3 580.00 NO BID 3 - 161 $ 123.00 9 615.00 NO 810 1 . 3 3,196.50 $ - , ' 162 NO BID I - NO BID S - 163 NO DID 3 NO BID s - 164 NO BID 3 NO DID 3 , 165 NO BID 6 NO 010 - $ 166 . NO DID s NO BID s - 187 NO 810 3 - NO BID i - 168 NO BID 6 NO SID 1 - 169 NO DID 3 - NO BID i - 170 NO 81'13 s ' - NO BID i - - 171 NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 172 NO 010 3 - NO BID 3 - 173 NO 810 $ - NO DID - S' .174 NO DID 3 - NO BID 3 - 175 NO 010 8 NO BID. s d" OF CLEARWATER 810120-H PAGE 4 OF 4 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION ' EPOXY COATED STEEL PIPE .176 2' STEEL PIPE . 177 4' STEEL PIPE 17a 6' STEEL PIPE .. 17a S' STEEL PIPE STEEL PIPE TOTAL: PAYMENTTERMS: DELIVERY (ARO): SUMMARY OF BID I" BIDS SOLICITED: r BIDS RECEIVED: NO RESPONSE; 'NO BIO' RESPONSE: DO NOT OFFER PRODUCTS; RECEIVED LATE AT PURCHASING: rJ, . ATS INDUSTRIES, INC. QUA" SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 1500 FT NO BID t - 2000 FT NO BID i - 500 FT NO B ID } . 500 FT NO BID i i NET 15 24 WEEKS 30 14 6 8 7 1 AVANTI COMPANY AVON PARK FLORIDA NO 010 i NO 010 3 NO BID S NO 1110 i i NET 30 STOCK TO 4 WEEKS PAG! 40 BEFIT LOWE SUPPLY CO. EMPIRE PIPE 6 SUPPLY CO. EQUIPMENT CONTROLS CO. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. FLA. INDUSTR IAL PRODUCTS TAMP FLORIDA TAMPA,FLORID A NORCROSS, GEORGUI PINELLAS PARK FLORIDA TAMPA, FLORIDA 17E NO DID $ - S NO BID S NO BID i 3 2.376 i 3,564.00 177 ' NO BID i S 3.6d•7.>j; 7,11=00f! • NO BID i - NO BID $ 3 5.656 3 11,712.00 176 NO BID 3 i ` 5 f 2,616.00, NO BIO 3 - NO BID i 3 4.696 3 3 34800 179 NO 510 3 $ 'S -ly`9406W` NO BID 3 NO BID S 111 1566 , $ 7,830.00 S - i 15,795.00 4 i $ 26,454.00 - NET 30 NET 13 NET 30 2% 10fNFT 30 2.3 WEEKS STOCK T02 WEEKS i3 WEEKS 10 DAYS ON REOUEST e 3" • i; r ' • a i r Y. i { i PAGE4C HUGHES SUPPLY INC. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ' 17a NO BID 3 - 17T NO BID 3 - _ ' 1Ta NO BID t - 179 NO 010 f f - 2%30 DAYS 30 DAYS M.T. REASON COMPANY MYLON C. JACOBS SUPPLY PEERLESS SUPPLY, INC. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA BROKEN ARROW, OKLAHOMA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA NO BID 3 - NO BID f - NO DID f - NO 01D 3 - NO BID 3 - NO BID 3 - NO 810 $ - NO BID S - NO BID 3 - NO BID S NO BID S NO BID 3 3 - 3 - f - ALL PRICES FOB BROKEN ARROW, OKLAHOMA ET 30 NET 30 2% 10TH ! NET 30 fOCKTO4WEEKS STOCK 1.2 DAYS STUART STEEL PROTECTION SOUTH BOUND BROOK NJ NO 010 f - NO 01D 3 - NO BID S - NO BID f f - NET 30 STOCK TO IS DAYS r F MOR 40 UTILITIES SUPPLY INC. JOMAR INTERNATIONAL ' LOGAlMLLE, GEORGIA MADISON HEIOHTR. MICHIGAN 178 NO BID s NO 810 S 177 NO BID III NO BID s - 178 NO BID s - NO BID $ - 179 NO DID. 3 NO BID S s s - !,.. . . NET 30 28-M DAYS NET 30 STOCK ,re W r. ,S E 1: . ;i . 1" FS' t" i? i' ;i i'i. aJ Clearwater City Commission Item #, - C;?(o = Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: SUBJECT: PASCO COUNTY GAS EXPANSION - PHASE IV RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract for the installation of polyethylene gas mains on Darlington Road from U.S. 19 west to Mitchell Boulevard., Marine Parkway from U.S. 19 west to Madison Road, and Grand Boulevard from Madison Road north to the Pithlachascotee River to Heuer Utility Contractors, Inc., of Clearwater, FL, at an estimated cost of $337,760, which was the most responsive and responsible bid submitted in accordance with the Clearwater Gas System specifications, © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: In order to provide timely installation of new gas mains for our fourth phase of expansion in southwestern Pasco County, Clearwater Gas System (CGS) proposes a contract with Heuer Utility Contractors, Inc. for the installation of flinch polyethylene gas mains and other associated materials along Darlington Road from U.S. 19 west to Mitchell Boulevard., and 2- inch along Marine Parkway from U.S. 19 west to Madison Road, and Grand Boulevard from Madison Road north to the Pithlachascotee River. This project also includes a 8-inch directional drill of the Anclote River between'Grand Boulevard and Olde Farm Road. • CGS's Strategic Plan calls for expanding natural gas mains into Pasco County in construction phases. This phase is approximately 5.27 miles. The Darlington Road extension will provide natural gas service to Trinity Community, Seven Springs Middle School, Trinity College, and the Morton Plant Hospital Pasco Campus. This project will also connect to an existing ungassed main we previously installed in 1995 during road construction on McMullen Booth Road. This will allow us to provide natural gas service along McMullen Booth Road from Keystone Road in Pinellas County and northward into Pasco County along Mitchell Road to State Road 54. The projected annual Non Fuel Energy (NFE) revenues for this segment is estimated at $ 64,000. The Marine Parkway and Grand Blvd. extension will provide natural service to Gulf High School and the New Port Richey/Columbia Hospital. The projected annual NFE of this segment is estimated at $45,100. Reviewed by; originating Department: Costs: Commission Action: Legal NIA Clearwater Gas System Estimated $337.760 ? Approved Budget tout ? Approved with Conditions Purchasin User Department: Estimated $337,760 ? Denied Risk Mgmt. Clearwater Gas System Current Fiscal Year ? Continued to; is NIA Funding Source: ACM ® Capital Improvement- Other NIA Advertised: ? Operating: Date: ? Other: Attachments: Paper: Tampa Tribune; St. Old Tab & Summary /17496 Petersburg Times Submitted by: ? Not Required Appropriation Code Affected Partin 315-96320.563000- 532-M 13 Notified ? None C Manager M Not Required 0 Printed on recycled paper • Work will be performed under the direction of the Pasco Manager of Gas Operations. The ` contractor will supply all labor and equipment, sod, asphalt, concrete, and curb replacements. CGS will supply the gas-related materials, (i.e., polyethylene pipe, fittings, and valves). The ' projected cost of the CGS supplied gas materials is $83,944.34. The proposed contract provides for all aspects related to the installation of the polyethylene mains. • The bid was opened on September 16, 1996. The bid received from Heuer Utility Contractors, Inc. was the lowest and most responsive and responsible bid that met specifications. • The are sufficient funds in CIP code 315-96320 called Pasco New Gas Mains & Services to fund this project. e:\agnnda\pasphiv.doc . ed f? ?t printed an recycled paper k . r M N M N N N M N N 9 a 9 8 8 ? N N N N N N N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 g a ? r N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N w 8 8 8$ 8 8 8 ,^ ?y N N N M N N N N r Or b IL N N M N N N M a 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 s? N N N N M N N M S o n p 8 8 8 M ' M N N M N N J y, N N N N N N N M y 1`0. ? ? ? ? ? 8 8 8 ? n r r o ? 8 N N W M N N M 8 8 8 O O O r r N N N N N M N N 8 8 8 $ y N N N N M N N le W6 H? '? . ? ? ? r N 1't V off n h •1' M? ??r(Qyy N N P 8 oN N m a N s8 N pM O r N M N 8 N N 8 N Ali h to r 99, ao Item #21 I.S.. t .. ,i ?r Hr iT . -f r- 1 F- ' 'F r6" { r!? =r`R •S , It L'.1 5i e .s S k I tem # Clearwater City Commission Meeting Dote: _ Hm Agenda Cover Memorandum SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 96/97 City of Clearwater Social Services grants RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the recommendations made by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) for allocation of the $38,000.00 in additional City social services funds which were approved by the City Commission during the budget hearings. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: By direction of the city commission, this social services grants program was made competitive effective for Fiscal Year 93/94. - In March of 1996 grant application forms and instructions were mailed to area agencies which had expressed an interest in participating in the program or which had participated in the program in previous years. The application and instructions contained provisions limiting requests to a maximum amount of $10,000.00 ($5,000.00 in previous years), and requesting that agencies submit only one application per project. Agencies were also requested not to submit applications for funding from .both the City Social Services Grants Program and the Consolidated Plan program for the same project. - Agencies were informed that, as in years past, the anticipated total funding level for this program would be $62,000.00. Thirty-four (34) grant applications were received. The applications contained requests of $257,206.00 collectively. On July 18, 1996 the city Commission approved the recommendations of the TRC for allocation of the original $62,000.00 in funding. The attached table contains information on the agencies which were approved for funding at that time. Entries for agencies previously approved for funding appear Reviewed try: N/A Originating Dept: Costs: $3$x000.00 Commission Action: Legal Budget Human P,elations Total 0 Approved rchasing Purchasing -0- la Approved w/conditions Risk Mgmt. 41/11 User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. E3 Denied cis ACM !Ad Liete Funding Source: © Continued to: Other rl/A Q Capital Imp. Advertised: M Operating Attachments: f Date: Passer: 17 other table Not Required Submitted by: Affected Parties 0 Appropriation Code: © Hone Notified CI R a I V Not Required 010-09232-532000-569-00 0 Printed on recycled paper EM 2 - on the table in underlined italic type. ., A further recommendation of the TRC was to add additional social services funding to the operating Budget for Fiscal Year 96/97. During the budget hearings, the City Commission increased the funding level by $38,000.00, making a total amount of $100,000.00. The City Commission requested that the TRC reconvene to make recommendations for the allocation of these additional funds. The TRC reconvened on August 8, 1996. It was composed of the following members; Kathy Boculac, Program Administrator Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (Ms. Boculac was selected by HRS to replace Barbara Butz who has accepted the position of Deputy Secretary for the Florida Department of Labor.in Tallahassee.) - Elizabeth Smoot, Single Parent Program Coordinator Pinellas Technical Education Center - Jill Perrino, Member, Clearwater Community Relations Board Herbert Freitag,-Chairman, Clearwater Community Relations Board Jerome Brown, Assistant Director Pinellas County'Social Services Department (Mr. Brown was scheduled to attend the meeting, but was unable to do so.) The TRC recommendations are based primarily on the agencies, average numeric scores. Most proposals were funded in an amount less than requested by the agencies, thus allowing a greater number of agencies to be funded. The attached table contains information on the agencies recommended by the TRC to receive the additional funding. New recommendations appear in the table in plain type beginning on page 2. -- Funding for the social services grants in the total amount of $100,000.00 is included in the recommended budget for Fiscal Year 1996/97. TABLE A TOTAL NUMBER OF CITIZENS SERVED BY AGENCIES AND PERCENTAGE OF THESE CITIZENS WHO ARE CLEARWATER RESIDENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS (Alphabetical. Listing of Agencies) Acrency Row African American Leadership Council, Inc. 14 Community Service Foundation 5 Coordinated Child Care, Inc. 7 Creativity ' in Child Care, Inc, 8 Family Resources, Inc; 16 Girls,'Inc: of Pinellas 9 Homeless.Emergency Project, Inc. 3 Neighborly Senior Services, Inc. 10 Partners in Self-Sufficiency, Inc. 11 Pinellas County Head Start 1 Pinellas opportunity Council 2 Quality Child Care, Inc. 4 .Quest Inn, Inc. 15 Religious Community Services, Inc. - Food Pantry 17 Religious, Community Services, Inc. Furniture Warehouse 18 Religious Community Services, Inc. The Haven of RCS 5 Resource Center for Women, 19 Tampa Bay Harvest 12 West Central Florida Council— Boy Scouts of America 20 YWCA of Tampa Bay 13 ,F `f ?.. r)? . ,1 ' y? z 1 ROW AGENCY TOTAL AND NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER FROM BONUS SERVED CLEARWATER POINTS (% / Number) 1 Pinellas County Head 320 100% / 320 10 Start 2 Pinellas opportunity 250 100% / 250 10 Council, Inc. (Youth Development Program) 3 Homeless Emergency 8000 78% / 6240 10 Project, Inc. 4 Quality Child Care 18 66.7% / 12 7 Center, Inc. 5 Religious community 54 93% / 50 10 Services, Inc. (The Haven, formerly known as Transitional Living) 6 Community service 80 100% / 80 10 Foundation 7 Coordinated Child Care of 7718 27% / 2084 1.7 Pinellas, Inc. 8 Creativity in Childcare, 330 100% / 330 10 Inc. (R ' Club) 9 Girls, Incorporated of 100 95% / 95 10 Pinellas 10 Neighborly Senior 16..549 14% / 2317 0 Services, Inc. 11 Partners in Self- 300 100% / 300 10 Sufficiency, Inc. 12 Tampa Bay Harvest 149 33% / 49 0 (agen-- cies) 13 YWCA of Tampa Bay 67 76% / 51 10 14 African-American 60 79.7% / 48 8.8 Leadership Council, Inc. 15 Quest Inn, Inc. 398 77.8% / 310 8.5 16 Family Resources, Inc. 600 95% / 570 10 17 Religious community 103,346 71% / 7 Services, Inc. (Food 73,376 Pantry) s;.......a-_,_ -- oo ,z........... .. 18 Religious community 672 % / 470 70 7 Services, Inc. (Furniture , Warehouse) . 19 Resource Center for Women 1250 17% / 213 0 20 West Central Florida 9526 16% / 1524 0 Council -Boy Scouts of America :k ;jFe f ' ??r l Fj s 44 ; R af' , ?YrRi?YS?.`t?-'a?t? ?c :,F itdelb.i ri:?n??;T.+•?1i l i.. - 7 .? it Ih. ' 0 H a a w ° a a m H O a } N [? m H W d ri a E-- H a u o u t A w H U Ii u° s w w? >4 rd I t4l rH -, rl -rl fa [Z •,1 9 N 0 ?wH a? $4 ,14 0 V U ? N {4 ? ai a bn a 0 0 C) :i ti b 00 C ce) r o o M ww,, W k U C/I U .? a ? 'Cl a L) S4 ..i W in a o v ? a H a0 O W H O z F ' i 1 1a1I-N m?11Di-m 01v(?1A0 riOr11+11D riaN N M N%r1a m co Q r1NN NN NHNHmrl N ri1`1 ri t'1 M m N H N Q U 0 ( W *ri- mu co co NNNr1i-in r rv01co r{r r,ma%f1 m m ri Na %V kn R. rti k U 0 ? F d 0 H U ?m u >1 ' 1-1 u 0 r. 0 H .•ri 4 1 H H (4 rl Il{ } to ? (.' r •rl rl to W k a u 14 in ro U Oi u u .. u u ti ti r. ail H 0 V • a a >~ k O F C C. '1 0 tT u 0 rl A H 9 U U H H (a H H W H 0 •ri rl c m m :3 m a C >; {I P, r, b+ U (14 •rl H H G ri U m H H f4 ?j.IH 0 H - i 1 ? H I ? Uu O W 4) k cf y 1 r1 14 r ?, 0144 :3 aI rrl ?, - V - 9 N u H 0 0 U H u menmr ur,0k 1 H Nw 4JM -4 0P0 •r io•li p•I p 0 -u 0 ri a -ri -r N d 'ty U P U? i U O U 0 O O a 0 al O x 11 P. b O , i N 1 r t i U N 44 U U l0 V W U N U? U 11 001 H! a j 0' O H k S , U1 cnEn r 1 lb + a I tl 11 I m mAHUH O 40 0 m G 0 a, v1A•1N 0 of 44 %.P a+ ao9U 9 al •A k •rl rl N U 'd b V H w V m m W •ri :j 0 V to V al 1J >•rl > 41 1-1 rti 0 Q4 1 H i W k • rii 1 0 N >; • 001 4) k 0 H ? r 0 41 0 41 c :J * l r{ • r 4 . r % 0 A V a 1 U W b U i 0 q +J GI d 0) 0 0 0 9 f44 0 W 0 ? a 0 N 0 m ' r 0 r r d , A O m m l•rlc a•r NmtnmO G ' u ' ''? 19 l ?xa k !5 1 •5t l 9 p ( } u ?ca ?;m 013 ? U?0 u?m a • r.004k main0 0 oba rl$$4rl ' 9 iw a 0 t''? a w a w a i" U '•° xwu)13 0 u z k IV u° u r 1 a , 5 in y A ? •i O O O ? U) r 1 ' H A U 9 s '? al > 0 U a +j V 04 U 4N( O U 'd Ul Fe a to Q+ in 1 1 1 I ?iVV CVV00-H 004 C800OU W ka Ln WJ4WriMP 0 0kJ U N "I •ri 'I a? N .11 0 H O 041 Old 0" k M W 0 •rl N 0 ?1 H ( a . 0 ) 0 d ? } } 'M - -( 9 vi ? u (o 41 m k a H j H -1 lq i ?+ • l l} U Ok l ( } •t W 0% U 4 r r r a a u C. v v T ? 111 0 4 $ -H 00 4:1410 0 1 . `1 ?a ?ii w ???n?a f 1 3 i Y, r 4- X31,+, ' `r ,1?yl 1 1 r a% In o m 1-1 •r H N H N rK Ln NU1 vkO•F N u ' to H C 4) rA r? a ? w ;> o N 0 O :3 V u Ih }1 u uN o H H {A i I' . . V) yy iv W y u u r u o .. 0) :j U In :3 V) ? O >t n1 V 4) V H 0 •r1 W r•'1 0 IM V 11 95 w 11-1 OF %4 0 N 00 ?4 n m pi u N rrl N N w I. W H 0 P; u P3 4) W44 (a ? r- U '.4 r -1 ) CJ N M 41 a. a >1 aH , 1 x 11 r? , f r ?i D D c o a a o D N ? O ? O ° u h v - b b w w y W N ?n N H o D o O 4J O Q) a to o y o? o o i a ] 0 of D m 4 1 u $4 4M 4 A N Ga O O p? O O ko of a O O 01 O O t?1 Ln >4 y h ?*1 b M O O O b vi u nl (n N 04 Ln 41 4; a u 43 4J q4 tA P Q) y O ra vi l(b 0) ti a u o ? a w lu ro U (n %4 .11 Q) N 41 111 a 4) Qa Qr O v a 0 4-) 4-J O U p 41 41 a s 11 0 U m f+ N A. ati to :3 L, Ic R 3 +n a 4) LA ro u : O O 4! in 4. L cu y V1 4J U to O U U 04 W a u< 4f U to 00 a -W '4 1- 94 a MI X 4J rl 4J C " t. ;- + a ? +? •D w It ? • c - m W 9z a 0 4 t D u a y D a U> t o0N a? ro i 41 O W 1-? V! m D to m 0 U co U v D P4 H F:` 4j 14 $4 4- D to a a s 'd • • h p? EL M p N U of ? a W al 4 ?n 47 y 41 010 nt U r ai R L H L ? 7 (U C a 'b d 0 to a O A 0 IA a a 4 7 to a a l 4J ? •p Rl 4 r 0 a ?? V1 q) o u bb a ++ u ? QI o •3m 11 1 t4 u '4 tr L to ro p ro> 0 u i m z m ar r 10 41 D R • u U ; ) Sab ? a ?D aD u . a f V a o o ' O O O O 1 O O O rt1 Q ' 0o uti n v, 1 a a a c o n o q O o q o a m o 6 ? q tT O rl 0 o n a, 0 0 o at 0 0 ry c ° z a m n n c•1 m w ?a w m ?f O N N N H H N U1 O V In 4) G) > 1? N ri R] ,?G 'a n m D 0) b k O G ?+ q 4) a U p1 k O O . .? 0 b N O > W NQ a 1-1 i -) 44'H 9 0 a) 44 C 01 O m 0 V h 'a -W 'O 'b r 4 N IU V• 1 'O •rj 0) O b it 4-1 m m -C r-I 0) 0) 13 01 7130)br-)Oqk D L f • a 4J W UaJ FU b 14 r, ro 'a cu m U9ak •Itroma ' ' 1 O) n 'U ? 4J a m% 0 q D U y t l J l, v 4 rn N m u1 v1 7 y F, r-4 D •Km a, ro r1O 0141k41w 4J 4J m 0 *11 4J a 01 O O ta N k 0) •a u m •.t O O? tn cs A.$4U 'Q V IV in H U m01 A U QJ -C ?l 'p Q OkN O t11 U b 4J mu 0) ro -ri rl rl z 'C4 0 M b+ 01 4 • ar x+ 1.1 IJN r A.U V M 4J , m? v r:vam oau ro U 00 000 U ro N tA P tn y U 'a 0 ••+ •b 1i j a, 0i N m m 1-) b 0)O{1 mw b1.? NaJ 01••+0004W41 1 ro 1-1 O ro tq m M m P J4 N N rI 0) R) 0) 0) 0) it - '0 0 '0 U b 14 0) 07 0) ? 0) +j c O U1 7a k 'b R I- to 'b 14 v o m A a a ro ? 'O 'b p o m +s 0 5 > u 'a N O 0M0-H:1mp 0 0 u 0 a10 ) O um? O kAAO)O:3M0 q u 10 4A U n) m > a U 0 > ru 4j 44 0 N asti I O 0 > ,p N S r, k 41 rl (U N4 fu " :3 1 S q U ? ? > RS I7 • i >; m m 04 m m -1 Q? (dH 0i a? ua? N ro J • d fi rl . ^ ..-:r"..?.dH?4•ai6..'•YE4? ?3._'. _.?.1i1.4i. ..i.? .... _ _ .. ._ r! W w to u to M U 'r b F5 z to M ul U N F- lt! 11J W Lt u) a 0 z O rl 4 O co O o O U1 d O O 4f1 +t N Q [T H O O co [b O O N U? O 4 4ri v N 4 al N 01 Of G l31 C O - O >J x .r• ? 2 O ci a o N N N N r? r1 rl % IU [` 11 N G 1 In 't7 4J rl 0) 'a •• O 01 N b m C 1 >. [L N• ri v1 O O P -1 wLn r4 rJb:da, 1 r4 O CU F- m al 11 >> O r w r1 V), 3 •r1 4) b to 0 / N O CJ Ol rC 14 (0 O O A}? V OI A 07 > O 4) 44 '0 'O tT tT O 4n H Id F M 4) Ol O n r-i [0 1 9 a a) 44 01 (0 0 0 b 9 4-1 0 4J a 10 [n F Ql 4j - ? •r1 44 a .+ A 4j F C > 0l 01 .-1 in O G O) 00 4-3 V u U O ro •? O ri 01 N rs r O O r4 •rt i] 4J 1.1 r. •rl l4 41 47 Ln 01 M ro r-1 a 1+ • V '0 W N 00 W m 0) 44 CD en 'o rn k C 11 •r; of 14 AaibApA U14 4a1 4-1 O • N 11 O 13 'r1 11 U' N 44 W 14 N 07 U q ? •rl ? • Ol O Ol 0 r 9. A O?.0 1- kNu V 1 41 14 N 0 1 b 11roO "1 ?R,O)r- .q N0"wP,11tn fi O U -OOrori '>AOulHeCu •A'irl11 OO 5O O r0 a r•1 44 to rl O N U !; N +•1 • N br 0 N 'O 14 • to 01 O 93R 00 00 NNur-1rgin Nr: in wr, 041 Ol 9 N U.C. to N r-1 11 b 9 al 10 •rl >, to NN P. lu 14 O al ? u to 41 y, N U N 07 b M 41 O N •ri •r1 N 4n lA <h 41 it N 44.'1 to F. Ln N P, •r4 in tr1 O 4) y y -4 10 01 C X +•rl 'O O> W -0 41 .9 Ol O ? O V X •ri r6 Cn 'O a) fr 0 w 11 'O 01 u r 41 0) N 'O 'b m 11 •H 41 > W H O -4 N F 044 o 01 •r4 A 01•x4 p 4 )4 14 41 u > 11 •r1 O •r1 > "1 01 •.{ O to > 0.00 11. V al ? $ 0 01 OU1+>.41 14 O?Ia?Il • Ou& ? ON O O N 1101U M :3 N4-IId•H00w 49 11?O.11a r. O o l Ol -1 .1 D. Q u • O W >. [n r 1 O U 11 N R ro u •r'1 11 AA > "a W ed c n 11 14 M • 1 Vl 1+ 01 •rl O b 01 b •rl N -W ? . f' y i H o 1 -.4 i Q •.1 (Ii H r a H m r1 H 1 4n r•1 M t 0 o O O p O O O Ln O O In •cf LA In ['1 6 O O N 0% O O co 0 o r O r o 9 F O O O z z Ln z g tn M o co ao co N rt rl rt ri 44 rl e? r•1 tT G a) F•1 1 y. N rn rd CZ rd G\k 1 N roromk .H -VA m N \ r-I . N m Z .q m k k JJ R IC V. F. 91 . V H O c a •ri ro 4 4) u O O 9 0 O O u ro r-1µ a 0 a) 41 9. O V ri Jw U 44 0 0 w v H m k ri ro 0) 'd 4a r s? •rl r1 N 2 k ? k o as Ut 1 ro,G a= 0) tn•r+4 ? 91 u in 0 ? 44 o a U a ° -4 -1 M - i H 4) Id 9 -44 0 H U •H ID p 'G p' ro' + - i k r 0} P F VI N ? •r i W A 0 3a 13 10 u . r. 'C3 CO V r? 11 r . N 4) a) 3a M O v V F •ri •rl r-4 a s Z V 9 W a to 44 ro9 #a 0u 0 U O a ?Q)? ? roi0 V '1 0r-f ) tm\0 •i9• >+ ri a1 ro ? mA0> 2 # r 1 A .C r ri " •ri M N O 01 U r r A ro •,I k N k R4 U9OU 1 Vl O •'i m 9 i ? sZ• 0V 00939 •ri 1'-. O V N ri a) :1 O> N k k •r1 .h4 •ri -1 0 O O -0) 4J r a? k r-1 •C P 10 ? b Ia A r-I -A P A MO , O V 'U N C. •O U N ri m 4J N U 0) 0) a) O ? ro 4 A 'a 41 U 1+ o •rl '[1 k •rl 9 rl a) •r1 0 41 rC0R7 P 13 bt Bt U -1 tn :3 Ia r-I OW S O N b O N A U O N u 0 at F? a a tn r4 -r1 •ri 0 O 0) Id - 4) (0 O a a 0-11 N O>% V •rl O ro Q k k 41 N r'. W 4 C >% V b 41 O F }I W ri V •rl U N •ri 13 a V ttl Q 3]4 r. r. o u to +u a1 G m a tT 4) 1; V A r- •rl -11 k 0I 3+ * 4) 010 41 A. N •r1 In w A O N C+ ,q a) 9 N O VI 9 al ro 'G k 41 O u •01 k 01 •rl O) k •r1 0 k a) = 4) N w al 0) N k 9 9 7 V a a, eo >. r~ u •o a 'CI >, a) fa. 'C3 •r1 a1 O 13 N m 7, al o al p Ga U ; ?ur. t7l >ka)>1 0)IUV •? fl r >r4UWe -IH ur x a) O k 0 0 MH N t 4 O as O w•r1 Fs O O 0) p.4 N . O•rt k+w (1) k V k al 34 O 13 •C1 1J N O N k a O k a) k •r1 r-1 41 , O O $44 Oro A •r1 •ri «'3 Pi :g to w t4 N 4-4 W J _#9 M M10 •r1 •r/ Md 44 r O r. ± +t u Oa a • t? to 34 1.4 rd 0 ?` 14 f A . u:3' W • u v u1 O to 9 C N r'1 ri ? ri M r-I v r, ;I F t ti. 0 0 01 N 1I1 r in t~ r? ri rl o v w H v G1 i? ul o, 1+i W Ch O a a o s~ a O a 0 z z in r P. in ri H ri H rI H Gi w 4j u ui 0 O a b u •H k 41 u UpN 0 l ? p ki 0AxN 1 am q acl' aR ?r 1 t >l •r .1 C . 'u0 a•H•H A , is k u v 0 ro A al a p al A ai al al 'I] u 41 a k m-H k a k 0 O a kb SA 9 m N> 0 is V iT 13 0 +3 W 9, 0 > 0 •H O 4J O w co •H to a•H a O •H P 01 'u 41 •,i .tl ?.4 44 0 1I P N ri.0 k HIQ V a 0 ? 'q NV M yt1•H •H 11, pi A w U k 18 a s r4 N ? i~ i1 0 tT i? '0 g; H N 0 a •H O a 1C id a 0 HamuO 0 H to xaiaU HrT0 97 rd•Hw N 1.1 4 GI AIJri a .9 a G O Iu .4j r. k k 0 'a r•l •H ?J A r- A U k U H Ill •H P. 0 0 •H0a'C1 N'atog AW N am akrok W 44 fu13 V 0 aC:a a 0 10 v1CU Pi w10 io 'ad 0 0k44 k N OF •Hq 0k 004 IAC44 .0 UOO? U•HO't 41 'a00 tN O b ro 44 N ? totn0'Oa4j N NN >i NN N $4 a 10 LriC) u! i aC.li,k 00 o C • 01 41 tn113 a OOg 5 0 ?A ] N -i 41 H to r, r •' tT t.. P W (V WO •y ? a r. b •11 a i rir ' 1-1 ? 0 0.1i N 0 k (T D O. 0 0 k•H 0 O'D 0 a M k 0 >+ i; 9H••i 0 0 kkln -i C) 1 14HkP14 am $4 0)mO•HMto 0)0k W W .4 ll U -0 _4 N 44 W N N 0 a u.. a u a 0 O 0 r 1 N H w t7, V >T a ?. a k l rd a a N W H? W r 1-1 41vi n r.ua acuHo a a ? 0•HV O-H [A 0 ?4 41 () 4) Ai 0o 00 wP N D1 4 O a 4 . Ln `!?'Fi'x11?i?'1 '' :.'S??:, rtF,.}`?y,:=.?:? s ,,,•?- ?'31!'.??.:,...??',?; j ; 1 ri.?.. , .s; ..? ._ .... ..._. ?. F ' .. , e ? - , i Q O E I Q O 1 O 1 ri 0 o a In o 0 1V O en ri 470 Q O O 0 z eri z ri ri r4 O H ri ri ri .9 ilj 54 Tl u r 4) r: .- l r-4 r-l tT - q3 N N 1-14 JC 0 N A N 9 44 tn 41 4a 4j 44 1 a b N•r4 0 41 U d 0. a O W t~ 41 1;m•n4ar. (AN4) G•4to(a0 O N tU N O 'O a1 U) O 41 •-1 N ro 0 tT a ri •rl O •ri 13 •r4 w 01 ?' •G ro U ro i1, ro m L3?•-4 ZI o aJ ro b (? --+ 4a m ro F 7 of 41 N x 41 44 !~ 14 a1 ro ro ri r. AH .y O C9 (fA OOOu$40O 41 NG7J4U •rfrC P O •-1 ty rl 0 •4 u? O •rl A 44'0 N O 4J 0 R O O 14 a 4`1 1: q .O 0 -A 4A ro t4 41 p. P 01 .4 p. q3 ra n - 4a P P a 0 0 F •-4 0 0 .'R +j q3 r4 p t!1 •r4 4a N> tD a1 a 14 ? `? U 4114 iJ .m .b aa)H a 'O `4J 0 M ' O U 4 O N 0 ? O O t~ p C V A b N - A0mcp Ia I I •- O -uMr.0) N0 41 tf a a& 41 Vlxal NN hNAu UVdt k -N 0 4 1 U ro W4tlG1?4U"IN +41N Rtr ai s ? •r4i}444-4OO. ro riua4na ri . I 4 . •? u 4a ro -1 U P M ? > r4 •r1 14 CD el 0 - 14 N l"W N 0 0 0 R co H O M O N 1- 4-J 1.1 O N 344 O G 010I 7 } 4}•rl m N O r-[.. 41 14 O O "r tP - ?+ N r . N 41 O , •rl 0 LL 41 N ? . 1 . a O 14 'a O 13-1144 13 N 4a F 0-0 M N r -l N u 'O to P 1? M 14 '0 W Sd N O U O w 0 P, 1 ?O O 0 l 4) m to a rA r- N P u1 N a F •rrl Ca R 44 ? 11 1 a to 4 r•i tY% s r4flW4q•r10 m1ir 1 O algpCk,1J??1f roF1n•.i+4 a au+ OO . 1pQ •? l . j r >. A-.4 0 47 t3k N 10 r•4 a1 b > •r1 rd n Ar 41 N q3 al ? 0 ' > to ro •r1 d rcl 0 r-4 li O 0 O O a 1 1 0 r1 44 3a O N 41 U a1 d a 0 14 .,4 -1 X 14 14 . 00 0, 13 ri 14 •r4 ri 41 O O to a M P 4 -1 N O.3 rl >, 4a 0 N 41 ra ? 4a 1a N '? 0 H 1- 4 4 4 ?? tp '' ° a o i 4 41 a) 4 r-4 (i r r - 1 w 0)i 1 • 4 i b rn 4 O: rl W.u N uA r. 0 a rl u tr0 ? { U : • t•W •4 O .? j1 1.4 41 00 0 " 4 N 0 0 r10 A 1 41 C 4 (1 x1[4 N7 o a o 0 t E 1 0 un O 0 0 m O O O rn O O r a v a Ln t- at m a1 0 m ri 0 O z v z m s1 ca o ro v ,-I o 0 0 H ri H ri ra >i k N 01 V N 0 a1 a1 01 x k 'O 0 Oi J4 W 01 IR 'D k N 0 c 41 4110 W N O U 10 V H O A k N G 41 P N O DC 41 G b ?$ N :k 0--1 44 a1 b 10 A .ri ' l 0 V V O to I O b (a()A0 WI; 10 4-4N0+N 0 k 01>? 34 O M N A 11 41 RI b W W •,I •ri •ri O P N O 4 (14 0 r-1 V O N 0 1I1 01 a) ra c k N N 01 10 A V N W 41C.•ri4.1 9 '041 041wa1 u1k Ota r r.x N a C 41 V N 'O ID H b '0 ri A P w b '0 r, •n O •H N c O 01k•r1000F15. 0Org n, 1017 M 0 U k "1 G P+ 1 U 1 O 4) •H r.N r.> 41 aObN V 01 4 H ff y 0•ri1] ? i I -1 '? N N11 t N10Nb¢ 0u 0 r , . = r . d Oil m 01 [P 0 ;r : A G N N k 41 •ri l11 U •r1 0! 44 k '0 C W U G U tP ET >r r 0) r 41 IT W N P V 41 0 - l y O N b I" •r1 •rt -ri r. W 0 O 1a O 0(a ri O 41 0) N A H? '0 z U 41 > 13 yy ri r-I V "1 b •ri 1: N 01 G 01 •ri 0 'A 'O U V R R! 41 •ri '0 •,I Q k 10 . LI k 0, 10 k H V -ri b b M 0 H H e O k k 10 0 C. W 01 k a1 N O U N N U r1 ri 0 41 M A '0'0 V U1 4F O. V 0.14 N 0 0 a! . w •ri 41 N ;1 k U W V) r., N •. A m 9 a 0 A a I- V W 1 1 O 0 O - 94) a 14 to 2 44 p 4 N : 0 N r-i 'O tP tl% N V 4J 'U -ri 01 •li r, n1 OI 41 tT 9144 O N UU iV ? >~ N H N I ai O 01 ri 13 0 U N GL 0) N b 10 r-I j a rl G". r4 0 U -ri 11 O ri >, t l ' H 31 61 ri O 0 0 O t 0 + al .Q N al > 10 k 0, ri {> Okk OkN kN't7N9kN • 00N44ui T k OCkW r N10 CM A 41 k•+i 4 N k 01 It k AS 41 O 10 0 r k•r{H 10 10 k U(0 41 . 41 4-4 U Ori 0 0 r 1 0 n N b 0 G µ to 9 .H c U a 0 Q) go r H k . Ha 00 p NN ri ?a? 1 r+ u I H U N v0? Inv %O61 C, 1•r Fi t-41u N 4+ ?'? L_ n f 1 I 1 O O O O l t 1 1 LA LD G tb r- at 0 ra In O in ?D 1n P 41 a) O O O z z I z Ln r n N G ? ? v ri rn a% o, N 'c1 ul 0 O U V f-4 O O O a 0 R 1 V G 7 'tl (11 V to A 43 X43 b V ? of 13, i; 10 rl ri r. a1 0 w 1 al v Ui O w 1 a1 N 0 0 9 3- V W t m is q g r. 3 U) 1a FO Gl rl O a L 9 3 0 N W Az M • i O 0 0 0 O M FO N H O 3 C O ' I r•I 0 al O Ij 'IS r ri O (D ?'. }J q q w M Q H •ri It H 0 0 0 rl 14 Id •ri O AS ri ri 0 u 1} A N •ri r1 0 1a w, N L. N -4 m W -1 -4 al n ?. •ei q' W 4i N O Ia 44 Ia r??, 0 ? (V m N O Cl) m U! al ? m O 4'I 0 .4 N 14 W H 44 N tP,C W ri W N (TJC N H A b A •ri N a at N 0 Ja 0 0 ji 41 0 G ui -1 0 44 0 C. Vi .C. U 3 al H O in N 0 g N O •r! UI al N U •A r1 N . al 0 al •rl U 'O Ui m 4-1 0 b) N 0 W O ? r1 •ri N O u k v 4) r3 ul k Q o w a a) N 1~ d a) (a Ui :> a) a 0 N a1 '0 i4 O •ri w N k 1a b •ri UI 0 ?, b 9 R b •ri Ui O CO G P 9 O H 'O at •ri m 41 a 01 w g of U a N0'mUI w O y 0A 0 0 0 W0 m by 4 tn 0A . i• Id0x•-IH4J N ?•rIN N A N & ? • ? b0 14 N•riN r rwi AiA 'UM 43Nfa 93N ? ? b R N>YONU D 0 0 044 1-1 Nua!O 4n rl a! O a! ri ai 0 r. V A 0 0 ai A N C-1 H W ,,1 a1 i•7 'ri 0 H rl 0 '0 'U rl •ri 9 ri ri r, 'O N H m ri N LL P. W b is 0 Cn N ri al in m Aat to N al 1: N1, C, 01tatN0G xa1r•1!~ b 'a d A FN•.iC0 U ra N U 3i t0 -1 ? ?S N? u ..13 i W -1 Ul ai N N . .- V a) • Vi H N U! i N W N O 't3 A V V P U N U ' O ?'[3 A ra'0 i r r 41 •rl r! In N Ll, ' a1 • 'b L i Cal a 0 r ai •ri W •ri NN i? 0 1 l A al al • ' 0 N O 1; 0 to al W M 0 ' O •r R A 4i b W V al ID 41 N r , + U U -ri H r . i 0 N b U U 0 c 44 F 41 O ? ? tn rl R O H R7 N i G WUG ? Q alrt O O i'q ?Nb'Q• ilNa )9! OdAQ 0 'syt3gpP-N3 010uAN00. 4.4 *4 r 00 ONO Oawfou 1344 G1 N 1= 0 +0 0 00 i0 N O G b 0 0 p e0 0 w N'0 N? N 0 O O c ai r, X: W44 al n %4 44 n, .-+ M •.i 44 44 N r i 44 rS 44 v N a N t i O C p1 m U + V a CS q 1 A A qq 4 ~ v H In N N N U V 3 U' 3'. l 7 a l 'O d Id a1 'O a r {} r? . •ri N ?.{ 9 ' •,,,i N IV aD N +d {4 0 N L! l7 O M !a co ?€c?.+iiiLtxt?v:ni?«:;: sassr;? ?! t, wiS,`s•;.'i ?.. . ,_? t'? . .., ? . ' . , .. .. ., . , ' .. , ... ... , . , . . t i i c a 4 ' t?.c ;,r D O r C? O O O O' O D O 111 O C iY O ri H C s; F O O O z z z , t C t .. • ' l ri0M0) C) i1, •r1 O V 1 H m co ?cac .r u .r.t flo O O lp 41 0 0 (A P G O [ ? -- ari -4 NJJ N ? . { "• >1R4 0 94A a >.N a a p a H? 0 ri a .q u r-+ a u •r.1 u a t; a x r-1 y s4,-t •rt ul N r! a tJ •.4 -1 GW R r•i •14 •ei a > N LL H V •ri w a s 01 U O N A 'dap r4 N 'd N 4J " nl N i3 ri 3 b Of ri A W 41 W Ol r•t r•1 0 :3 14 •rl b+.9 u 'a N a tp N a rat •rl N p 'd A C V a C O % N >, •'•I N . C P •14 •ri .O >9 p W b 43 u a 'u 44,09 N H ri to N 3 43 to m a • ?' O ( a 0 0 ? ? i ri a a -r. b1.0 1.1 o' UJ3 1: a rl .+?=NN JJCU NC th k 0 N Ul N M N u u C rt p ?J a u N fi 0 a s it 3 C O> a N N 01 a 3 9 01 1 JJ O ?'O e4 N i a s N • r•t .C A p O J N a 1? N Gt N - N J M J413 O N N 134 r >i •rl > 43 a . •ri 010 t O O G V u N O O O JJ NU a 14 - W p a ti b W p N C 44 N 'O O N it b u a F lp Vl p to 'O 0 P ` Gr Z i • > to p W a O R1 to •t Ll p . J : a V 40 41 N J 1 r t - > a tpp 5A•ri J • r l O O ? w . q ? . p ri 1 10 4J 4 p, V V } . j N C C r , > a M N C?t N G > •ri a 0 a • > -H a 9 i1,•ri 14 ? a u•u A 0 O NA N C PM O ul•ri k'M p a N p Nr•t O 0 NNr4Oaxr^I NN.-i0 a a0 O O N Lo w a tj 44 w w 4a f3ti N G a •r i { .r ? p u p u r l 44 433 ri >1 r- fu Ul ri tl M a • 1 a s • ei 01 A r C d .,j 5r 4) (t t?riN 9 r r. p A4 P• 1 4t X ?•uri p x N ?H M pNO •11 0m • tv i.L W U! N r t7. O M N v N (q m 1 .4 H: Clearwater City Commission Item - Agenda Cover Memorandum Mecting Date: SUBJECT: LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE FOR EMPLOYEES NOT COVERED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER'S PENSION FUND RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award the contract to Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for long-term disability (LTD) insurance for employees not covered by the City of Clearwater's Pension Plan for the contract period of 1111196 through 10/30/97 at an estimated annual cost of $30,984.00 which was the lowest, most responsive, and responsible bid in accordance with specifications © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: City of Clearwater employees who are covered by the City of Clearwater Pension Fund are eligible to receive disability benefits under the Pension Plan. To offer a similar benefit to employees not covered by the City of Clearwater Pension Plan, the City began providing LTD insurance to these employees in 1987. In June, 1996 the City of Clearwater issued a request for proposal (RFP) for LTD insurance prepared by Tom Richarme of Wittner & Company. Proposals were reviewed from five carriers, plus the renewal from our current LTD carrier CNA Insurance Companies, Orlando, Florida. Monthly Monthly Rate Rate Payroll Premium Guarantee CNA current .75 379,636 2,847 to 11/1/96 CNA renewal .96 379,636 3,644 1 year Anthem .65 379,636 2,466 2 years Provident .68 379,636 2,582 3 years Standard .74 379,636 2,809 3 years Florida Combined .70 379,636 2,656 2 years Trans General .63 379,636 2,392 2 years Reviewed by: Legal NA Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt. _ IS NA ACM Other NA Originating Department Human Resources User Department: various Advertised: Date: 7126196 and 8!2196 Paper: Tampa Tribune, Pinellas County Review ? Not Required Affected Parties: X Notified ? Not Required Casts: Funding Source- 13 Capital Improvemenis X Operating: ? Other: approximately $30,9134.00 Total $30,984.00 Current Fiscal Year Appropriation Code 590-07000-545700-590-000 Commission Action: ? Approved ? Approved w/Conditions ? Denied ? Continued to: Attachments: None 0 Printed on recycled paper Page 2 of 2 Long-Term Disability Insurance Agenda September 30, 1996 a;l_ The LTD market is very volatile, with carriers entering and exiting the market on a monthly basis. The City's LTD group is a very unattractive risk due to declining enrollment and high losses. The overriding strategy with the RFP was to attract as many quality carriers as possible to bid on a bad risk, A provision demanding a three year commitment would have essentially eliminated most of the potential market. Thus, the RFP stated that the City desires a minimum two-year guarantee and would prefer a three-year guarantee. This insured group of employees' claims experience has continued to dramatically worsen over the last three years. The current LTD carrier has 2 disabled claimants receving benefit payments, plus 2 new claimants. Total claims paid, for open and closed claimants, plus reserves established for the open claimants, equal $193,483. Premium earned since inception totals $75,051. This generates an Earned Incurred Loss Ratio of 257.8°!x. In addition, the number of employees eligible for LTD coverage has declined by 30%. In November, 1993, the City. of Clearwater had 154 employees enrolled in the non-contributory LTD plan. In August, 1996, there are approximately 113 employees enrolled. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, a new classified employee who passes the post-offer physical is eligible to be covered by the City of Clearwater Pension Plan. Only new unclassified employees are eligible for LTD coverage since they are not covered by the City of Clearwater Pension Plan. In the past, the Pension Advisory Committee reviewed post-offer physicals and had the prerogative to disapprove employees with health problems. In the last few years, employees who were excluded from the Pension Plan have retired and are no longer replaced by other employees excluded from the Pension Plan due to health reasons. If this trend continues over time, LTD will become increasingly more difficult to obtain for this group. Thus, the three year commitment from a carrier takes on increased value. Provident at .68 per $100 of monthly insured earnings provides a 3-year rate guarantee at a lower price than Standard, the other carrier which offers a 3-year rate guarantee. The .68 per $100 rate from Provident is $265 per month less than the current cost and contract terms and conditions are equal to or greater than the current CNA contract. City employees currently receiving disability benefits under CNA will continue to be covered by CNA. An RFP Review Committee composed of representatives from Legal, Risk Management, Finance and Human Resources unanimously agreed to recommend to award the contract for long term disability insurance to Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. The fiscal year 1996197 employee insurance budget code includes funding for this contract and funding will be requested in the 1997198 employee insurance budget code. (2) • Clearwater City Commission Item a; Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting bate ' 1073156 :`:': SUBJECT: Countryside Recreation Center Change Order No. 4 RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve Change Order No. 4 for Countryside Recreation Center (95- 24) to Bollenback Builders, Inc., for the sum of $4,100.53 © and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • The City Manager previously approved three administrative change orders for this project totaling $24,348. The City Commission was notified of all of these administrative changes within the quarterly budget amendments. • The contract with Bollenback Builders, inc., is complete and a final Change Order No. 4 has been submitted and approved by Bitterli & Associates Architects, Inc., for $4,100.53 (see attached change order No. 4). • This change order includes additional work to solve drainage problems in pond B, provide additional engineering for soffit work and provide a permanent ladder access to the roof for maintenance purposes. • There are sufficient funds in the current budget to cover this final change order to the contract. Following is a final summary of the expenditures including Change Order No. 4: Current budget $1,579,897 Expenditures Architectural/Engineering (Bitterii & Associates) Construction of Building (Bollenback Builders, Inc.) Miscellaneous Costs (permits, prints, advertisement) Total Balance In project Reviewed by: Legal Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt. Is ACM Other Submitted by: city neg?T- Costs: Funding Source: © Capital Improvement: ? operating: ? 01han $121,002.40 $1,453,126.53 $4,774.27 $1,578,903.20 $993.80 Commission Action: 84100,53`1 ? Approved Total ? Approved with Conditions El Denied Current Ficcal Year ? Continued to: z•:..:• ' AttBclt?iintri?-»:?{., .Bullriubaak,'Wldrirt;aric;l. Approprfetion.Cods 315.9328 ? Nono 0 Printed on reoycied paper • CHANGE OWNER .ORDER CO TRACTOR AIA DOCUMEST G701 FIELD OTHER L? a3 PROJECT: . C JM? SIDE COMMiXITY RECREATION CENTER (name, address) 2640 SABAL SPRINGS DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL TO CONTRACTOR: BOLLENBACK BUILDERS, INC. (name, address) 3784 TAMPA ROAD UD M4R, FL 34677 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACT FOR, The Contract is changed as follows: 4.1 POND "B" WORK.. .:........ ....................$2,310.00 4.2 ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING ON SOFFIT .................. 878,00 4.3 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS BY.CITY BUILDING DEPT...... 1,112.00 A. GYMNASIUM ROOF ACCESS:. $1,087.58 B. BLANK PLATE FOR FLOOR DRAIN: 25.00 4.4 DEDUCT PAINTING OF WOOD FENCING .....................( 200.00) TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 $4,100.53 SEE ATTACHEMENT "A", "DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION" FOUR (4) 1996 9401 NOVEMBER 15, 1995 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract SumXfg)(XWX.x%W)*MxX1dxX%N•as .................. . ..... 5 1 ,424, 678.00 Net change by previously authorized Change orders ............................. . . S 24,348,00 The (Contract Sum);( {g( g?}(tij q?x?Kq prior to this Change Order was.... , ..... S 1,449,026.00 The (Contract Sum) ?trft }FX4f)Z?{t3(x X'tXLiFXnil1 be (increased) (XfMKXitG-}g " • . (X0 t q*A) by this Change Order in the amount of . . . ............ . ... . . . ..... S 4,100.53 The new (Contract Sum) (4 %XXXO*0M13tD0XMM(Xinciuding this Change Order will he ..S 1,453,126.53 The Contract Time will be (?OXO X A)(4tpq ootxdX(unchanged) by ZERO ( 0 ) days, The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is AUGUST 28, 1996 (261 days ) TOTAL NET CHANGE ORDERS TO DATE IS $28,448.53 NOTE: This !;untmary d(xns not rckct change- in the Ce,ntrtct Sum. Contract Time +rr Guar mimi Maximum Price n•hich hati'e been mhorized hr ClInNl tctilm changr Disenlyc, BITTERLI + ASSOC. ARCHITECTS. INC. ARCHITECT 3950 - 3RD STRCET NORTH .?darrc< ST. 7 Hl' ROB W J. BITTERL , A.I.A. DATE SEPTEMBER. 5, 1996 BOLLEN'3ACK BUILDERS, VC. CONTMCTOR 3784 TA^PA RQ4D A0&01- OLDS' 34677 BY _. 1"4iZ&j-'1_____ __ - DATE 10-5 6P - 9C THE CITY Or CLEARWATER CM NER POST 6=FICE BOX 4748 Addrr.< C±EARWATE FL 34618-4748 BY &Lk?_ DA•rE q113 116 .. , CAUTION: You should sign an original AIA document which'has this caution printed in red. An original assures that changes will not be obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. AIA DOMMENT G701 ¦ CHAMPE UMAR • 1'm' EI ITIUti • t:?} ', li:,' • ;& A+tERI[.4? I'. Wt 7E (.F ARLHITECTS I"'' `•C•s ) r.?kK AVE. 1'A ., W h1,11 %[,7c,?. U (: 2+??R• G701-1987 WARNING: Unficansed photoeopyiog violates U s. copyright Isms and is sutiect to legal prosecution. a3 COUNTRYSIDE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 SEPTEMBER 5, 1996 ATTACHMENT "A" DES CRIPTIONIJUSTIFICATI ON CIVIL. ENGINEERING ITEM 4.1 Pond "B" Work A. At the north end of Pond "B" (on eastern side of existing parking lot at edge of lake) existing grades of parking and existing sidewalks caused the need for additional work to properly direct the flow of water via curbing and to disburse the water via a flume structure. B. This solution also contributed to greater safety of pedestrians coming and going between the parking lot and ball fields to the north, because the curbing provides a barrier between the edge of sidewalk and parking with the slopes of the pond. C. Erosion is reduced. Total item 4.1 ADD $2,310.00 ARCHITECTURE ITEMS 4.2 Additional Engineering. of Soffit A. The building design called for the need for specialty component engineering on the stiffening and support system for the plaster exterior soffit to meet the 130 mph wind load requirements. This component engineering was provided by the builder to produce a cost effective design. Total Item 4.2 ADD $ 878.00 4.3 Add iional Re uir m n for-City Building D a men A. During the course of the project the City of Clearwater Building Department required the additions of a permanent ladder to access the roof, along with slip resistant "tread" material to be applied to the sloped metal roofing. These features were not in the original design, so they were added. ADD $1,087.53 B. The Building Department wanted cover plates installed over the floor drains in two (2) mechanical rooms. ADD S 25.00 Total Item 4.3 ADD $1,112.53 4.4 Deduct Painting of Wood Fencing A. Some fencing around the mechanical units and transformer on the project was left "natural", rather than painted, at the request of Parks Dept. Total Item 4.4 DgDUCT I'$ 200.001 TOTAL FOR CHANCE ORDER NO. 4 ........................ ADD $4,100.53 • Clearwater City Commission Item: -q'--, 7 Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date:: 10/3/9b' ..:. ' SUBJECT: Carpenter Field Clubhouse Renovations Change Orders RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Confirm Change Orders No. 1, 2 and 3 for Carpenter Field Clubhouse Renovations (96-15), to Oakhurst Construction Co., Inc., of Seminole, Florida, for the sum of $25,570 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • On June 20, 1996, the City Commission awarded a contract for Carpenter Field Clubhouse . renovations to Oakhurst Construction Co., Inc., of Seminole, Florida, for the sum of $621,647. ? A project budget of $758,147 was established by the City Commission. Part of the budget included a $30,000 contingency fund for miscellaneous items that might occur during the construction phase. • During the demolition phase, three separate change order items became apparent. They are attached and are outlined as follows: 1. Removal of the entire concrete slab and replacement with a new, 4-inch thick concrete slab. The moisture barrier on the existing slab had deteriorated and the thickness of the slab was not consistent. $9,900 2. Change roof system to a standard 4-ply roof system. Roofing materials specified may potentially be damaged by persons walking on the roof thus a change order to a more conventional roof system. $7,570 3. Additional costs to remove and replace cast iron sewer lines with PVC pipe. Existing sewer lines were at an elevation that could not accommodate the new design of the building $8,100 Total $25,570 • The architects for this project, Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, recommended these change orders which were approved by the City. • Sufficient funds have been allocated in the project to handle this cost. Reviewed by: Legal Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt. Is ACM Other Submitted by: City nags 0 Printed on recycled paper ??NI Costs: Advertised: 3?gtt; ?v r7 ?; ? Not Required Affected Parties ? Notified ? Not Required Funding Source: ra Capltal Improvements ? operating: (3 Other: ;'Appropriaiiun Cods:: 315.93202 Commission Action: ,570 ? Approved Total ? Approved with Conditions ? Denied Year ? Continued to: :oFderrt: Ching* 1 ? None SUP- 1 1 -1306 WEED 2 1 +?^ OAKHURST CONST t Carpenter Field Renovations September 11, 1996 651 Old Coachman Road Clearwater, FL 33516 Project # 96.15 Post, Buckley,Schuh $, Jernigan inc. 2001 N.W. 107th Ave Miami, F] 33172.2607 $05.592-7275 Changes to project: Remove concrete slab complete, re-compact sail and poison, re out slab 4" thick Costs include loader, bobcat, and track hoe rental, dumpster and dis posal lees. Demo existing concrete slab on grade 9000 $5.00 $4,600.00 Fron; end loader for removal $950,00 Dumpster fees $3,900.00 Labor $2,500.00 Soil Poison 9040 $0.13 $1.000.00 Compaction 9000 $0.15 $1.350.00 Slab replacement 9000 $1.65 $14,850.00 Concrete Pumper 160 CY $1,500,00 Total amount for slab rep!acernent $30,554.00 Mess credit for trenches • remove and replace concrete ($8,300.00) Less credit for epoxy floor leveling materials ($9,204.80) L.es3 credit for rental equipment - track hoe, saw, compactor ($1,558.00) Lose credit for concrete pumper ($1,600.00) Grand total this change order 0 1 $9.900.00 P 9 City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 Attn: An Kader 662.4823 $9.900.00 A SUP-11-96 WEDS 2 2 : 4 2 OAKHURST CONS7 MFG= Carpenter Field Renovations September 10, 1996 City of Clearwater .. Di Old0whMAMPad Clearwater, FL 33516 Prajeet 0 96.15 Post Bucidey,Schuh & Jamigan Inc. 2001 N.W,107th Ave Miami, FI 33172-2507 305.592.7276 Changes to project: Change roof to a 4 ply MUM eys119m with walks as per print Existing roof system is currently a built up 3 ply system with gravel. Now root system to be 4 ply roof system with gravel ILO PVC, granular flashing at all vertical PMlections 10 yr NDL warranty Less credit for speaitied root system Grand total change order 9 2 F :f • ( ail tent P.O. BOX 4748 Clearwater, FL 34818 Attn. Art Kader 562-4823 576,820.00 (669,250.00) $7,570.00 OQNWUp?T GON?T?UC110N GOMpaNI,INC. C0?646??? Carpenter Field Renovations 651 Old Coachman Road Clearwater, FL 33516 Project # 96-15 Post, Suckley,Scihuh & Jernigan Inc. 2001 N.W.107th Ave Miami, Fl 33172.2507 305.692.7275 September 10;1996 Changes to project; 1 Costs for location and labeling existing lines to remain - water and sewer fines added after original building construction, Remove and dispose of existing Ones to be replaced, sanitary sewer line, water lin (:replace existing C I sanitary sewer ling complete with PVC as per prints Credit for not using C t sanitary sewer lines as originally specified and shown as added to existing system. Cost for track hoe to excavate existing sanitary sewer Costs to locate manhole Grand total Change Order # 3 City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34616 Attn. Art Kader 562.4623 $250.00 $850.00 $9,500.00 ($4,300.00) $ 650,1wk $1.300.00 $500.00 $8,100,09 SUP-;Z4-90 TUC l 4 : 07 OAKMURST (--OW" T r _ 0 1 b: Clearwater City Commission Item Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting late SUBJECT: Sunday Recreation Hours RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve a six-month trial period (October 1, '96 through March 31, '97) of opening five recreational complexes including the recreation centers at Clearwater Beach, Ross Norton Park, Martin Luther King, Morningside, and Countryside on Sunday afternoons from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m. at an estimated cost of $17,945. 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • The trial period for this program will run for 26 Sundays, October '96 through March '97. • In general, Sunday operational hours will run from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m. • The recreation centers to be opened on Sundays include Clearwater Beach Recreation Center, Ross Morton Park Recreation Center, Martin Luther King Community Center, Morningside Recreation: Center, and Countryside Recreation Center. • Estimated operational costs including staff, utilities and supplies for these five centers are as follows: Clearwater Beach $3,881 Ross Norton Park $3,530 Martin Luther King $3,438 Morningside $3,511 Countryside 53.585 Total $17,945 • The above does not include the opening of Ross Norton Park Pool during the six-month trial period. The trial period would include the cooler fall and winter months. If the opening of the Ross Norton Park Pool is desired, the additional cost would be $4,377 for staff and utilities. • Staff funding was computed utilizing the existing staff salaries of employees assigned to these recreation facilities or within that section. Numbers vary due to the fact that employees make different wages based on tenure with the City. Further, at some facilities, there are more permanent part-time employees whose work schedules can be increased but still remain below 40 hours, avoiding premium overtime. In other cases, full-time employees would have to be used which would involve overtime. • The estimated figures may be slightly high due to the overtime factor and staff will make every effort to utilize permanent part-time staff. • The first quarter budget review will include an amendment to provide the necessary funds for this project from undesignated retained earnings ofi thy- General Fund. Reviewed by: Legal Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt. Is ACM Other Advertised: ® Not Required Affected Parties ? Notified 0 Not Required Submitted iw I Cit anepar 0 Printed on recycled paper costs: . 6'l'7 Totnl Currant FFvcM Year 11 Funding Source: 13 Other, -Code .. ::AppreprlaQon Recreation Cost Centers ' 0 capital Improvement: ® Operating- Commission Action: ? Approved ? Approved with Conditions ? Denied ? Continued to: Attachments: ? None f; / ev?l t s Item #26 --FR) Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum t rem' Meeting Date: l0 3 SUBJECT: CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT BANNER PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve Citywide Streetlight Banner Program based on the recommended locations at a cost not to exceed $20,000. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACRGROUND: The proposed goal of the Citywide Streetlight Banner Program is to expand the existing downtown banners to other well traveled commercial parts of the city in response to citizen groups wishing to showcase the City's major activities to both residents and visitors. Banners will be clustered into five recommended areas of the City, which are: 1) Memorial Causeway; 2) Clearwater Beach; 3) North Greenwood; 4) Hwy. 60 Welcome Center and 5) Countryside. A total of 62 new streetlight pole locations are recommended. Details of the proposed areas and pole locations are attached. Initially, the program would duplicate four subjects currently being displayed in the core downtown. Subjects include Clearwater Jazz Holiday, Fun N' Sun Festival, Welcome Winter Visitors and Welcome Phillies. Subjects may undergo redesign to accommodate restrictions imposed by the Florida Department of Transportation and/or for greater visual impact. Banner pricing is based on a total of 248 banners (62 pole locations x four designs), printed two colors, two sides and on white background. Final costs may vary slightly depending on final design. Hardware is based on the 62 new pole locations and will be reusable for each streetlight banner subject. Support has been received from the Greater Clearwater Chamber of Commerce, Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce, North Greenwood Association, the City's Beautification Committee, and the Clearwater Beach Association. Funding for this program will be provided by the reappropriation of savings in the City Clerk's 1995/96 program budget to the office of Tourism Development program budget for FY 1996/97 at first quarter. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: S 20.000 Ce ission Action: Legal ii/?1 Tourism Total O Approved Budget rev Purchasing NJA S 0 17 Approved w/conditions w Risk ggmt NIA User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. 13 Denied cis N/A ACM N/A Parks and Recreation funding Source: U Continued to: Other NIA 0 Capitol imp. Advertised: H Operating AttachAnts: Date: 13 Other Streetlight Bonner Program Paper: Maps i d X N R Letters of support equ ot re Submitted by., Affected Parties 13 Appropriation Code: Notified 010.09213-543200-552 17 None i X Not Required eru r C CITY OF C.LEARWATER Posr OFFICE Box 4748, CLFARW"ATEA, Rowan 34618.4748 Ow 11A1.1., 112 5olmi OscEoLA AVENUE, CLEARWATEN FtowDA 34616 . TELENIONE (813) 462-6700 FAx (813) 462-6720 OFFICE of TouwSM MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Commissioners . FROM: Jean Sherry, Director of Touris 'Co". Betty Deptula ' y . SUBJECT Street Flag-Banner program agenda item DATE September 20, 1996 Attached please find street flag-banner recommendations pursuant to the September 5 Commission, meeting; Included you will find locations for consideration, revised costs and ' letters of.support for the program. 1 . M'- I -'. - PAGE - L CITYWIDE FLAG-BANNER PROGRAM September 20, 1996 f sr. . k { i`. BANNER SPECIFICATIONS: 39'X 69' Double Sided White background plus 2 colors 62 total locations Four different messages - Jazz Holiday, Welcome Winter Visitors, Fun N Sun, Welcome Phillies LOCATIONS: (reference maps attached) Memorial Causeway 22 (11 poles) Double arm, every 5th pole in the center of the boulevard between Memorial Causeway Bridge and the small bridge Pier 60 Drive and Causeway Blvd. 8 2 banners each side of Pier 60 Dr. (4) 2 banners each side of Causeway Blvd. (4) Gulfview Blvd. 8 Single arm, west side only between Pier 60 parking lot and Hamden Dr. Hwy. 60 Welcome Center 8 Single arm, north and south sides of .the hwy. between Bayshore Blvd. and, Welcome Center Countryside Blvd. 6 Single arm, at the intersection of Countryside Blvd. and the south entrance to Countryside Mall (Sears). i PAGE -- 2 FLAG-BANNERS - Page 2 North Greenwood Single arm, east and west sides of Greenwood between Seminole and Carlton (Phillies Stadium through the commercial district). COSTS: 1. Design Four at $120 each .2. Printing (Dunlap, Inc.) 62 locations x 4 designs = 248 banners at $32.82 each (double sided) .3. Screens $10.00, per color per design 4. Hardware 62 locations at $75.00 each S. Installation Instalt and take down of 248 banners City labor 83 hours at $47.50 per hour 10 $ 480. $ 8140. $ 80. $ 4650. $ 3942. TOTAL $17,292 PAGE - 3 1S M3t30 p+? ,MND+MA ISLA140 P? MIDWAY ?' ISLAND a WAY A why 6p?D M a $ a yea ip N dc?? d o ?lIOIfS ? 1Sy? m yu-L35N1pj Ati'7YCjwkv Czai ? ? ? ?m'NOao??' k?N 'i3AJ7rp s ?y i ¦ 0 1 i 1;J6".i.?,3:;;?&i,;'s??;..,w..r?:n.a?::?is.v-?n?.. ........ ... ...,?. ,_ ._ ? .. ..: ._. ..... .. .. , .. ._. . ? .. ,. a .. .. .. ? " L PAGE - 5 i? , PAGE - 6 L NA?4Ar.i YT. m 40 O cAuecrAr Rw. uATrH LK 0 uAtpi uw a I X410 11RST ADAMS MARK t i 3 7 i NA" Irt c YAUH W [ PAGE - 7 V ONO" VQ3AV1V O O MY k3d3iNOVl a 3AV V834Vn J-IF ?HAF x ? i 5 A V >> >v I I Y .A A I CP 0 m ' 15 .H. S C13 ON " HIOOO 0 ro II !I ? _ It?i Ln I? D 15 Aa???? d? u z ?xar? MoaV311 co I CUE]I C0 03 3AY M3Wltl8 ? 0P J=x I? TAN!GLEWOOO ? ? ? Qd NOINLIOHI LLI • O - OW !3z w U M ? i . 1 p,h , PAGE - 9 I ? 3 z bd 03SI83 w {? V M ao 3M1 An •`a `' C t 3 DILL Weld rJao II NOOK a ?Q v ?w?•/•r { x• SJ .a u 121 Q [raa: 6 L 'S ''n 1/ ITERPRI? 5-E -J O r? PIt?E ??? 1 Q' tto OR aolwa 35N3Ar rIV32l1SNaYd Q a33NVaNf35 ? \ 'l? t338wS 6 L 'S 'f! ? l IC .- CI C D L k- -A as 50NV183HU3N -? 3 Flo n N-3AVH 380OYiy N?JIK3W ` O ? 4.? ? !1l ?•(7 I? 4J LS3H783©Y?ll lob IcXI o 04 63HO139 NO 3NtlOH1MYN 3 LM, y1 ] fa+na7 SSrd OgquhxarA (O 3 CIR ?N30 f I m ?i C PAGE - 10 i .?+YI+CGyS S ? ®rsa:a'+i.?ALf.:?3».Y.tirtru.3:e?l?Y+r......?....,.......«.... ...,.. ?...«.... ........_. . ... ......... ... .. _ .,.., ... ... _V _,__... ?, .......< .... ... ? .. .. . PAGE - 11 ifltam'wct" za-V4 13?? ? COQ 7 395 S.R. 0 WA RJ-1q?r ?e ACT. lZI rr^i N AVE N ? -+ SaR?ucE n 1:1 El 41:1 ?F ?y NNE AVE ? ?? y ,? rn BOOTH AVE ~ -a 1[*A1 N ~ '• O O z 1 y u U n'EEE, t^ ; WASHINGTON AVE I HW MADISON AVE s? l MISSOURI ON AVE LINCOLN AVE ?POD A PRESCOTT LA A D HI z JR? ?'??Q HILLTOP AVE ?MARIVA?? F z r1 ROLLEN H 1a ?14In WESTON a ? z MYRTLE AVE FT -_ x L ? 1 _ APACHE 9 MaE 4 AVE n 0 n© A T L TRAt m m :lAVE WA5HINOTON MADISON KING AVE IV, a n K m { RD . 1 PAGE -- 12 vv'? ?F 'AS AAM mwj 'IST is riwni •u ?o, J 04LWMJ EMulive Committee Paul J, Kelley President Charles J. Pollick President Elect Diane Roush Secretary Kaz Rolewskl Treasurer Phil Hobby Executive Director Board of Directors Nicki Psaltis John Besedic Mia Boutzoukas Steve Chandler Marysia Coates Sheila Cole John Doran Ralph Howes Gerry Husgen Susan Lewis David Little Tony Markopoulos Sophie ogrodny Louis Piano Jim Reynolds Ken Rosenow Chuck Schlesman Bill Sykes , James Warner September 12, 1996 MEMO To: Jean Sherry, Office of Tourism From: Paul Kelley, President, Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce Re: Banners on Clearwater Beach The Board of Directors of the Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce would be in favor of the city program of displaying banners on light poles throughout Clearwater Beach. We appreciate your soliciting our opinion on this matter. If I or the Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce can be of any service, please give me a call at 441-4465. Discover Clearwater's Islands. and Sparkling Beaches i s I l i i t i i i Post Office Box 3573 Clearwater, FL 34630 Phone: 8131447-7600 F=cuilve comm'Iftee Stephan R. Fowler Chairman of the Board Janice S. Case Chairman-Elect E.D. Armstrong, III VC Govemmenlel Af lrV Economk Development Charles D. Riggs. 111 VC Sma!! Business/ Area Councils Larry Cooper VC Tourism Daniel T. Mann VC MembershiprPnbfkaflons/ PublicRelauons • Judy Mitchall VC Spaolel Events Sam A. Davis, II Treasurer Ann Witklns Duncan Immediate Past Chairman Julius J. Zschau Legal Counsel Kathy Rabon President, CEO Board of Directors Mark N. Abdo Daniel M. Andriso Charles E. Behr Alan C. Bomsleln Gregory Broslus Jared Brown Robert A. Burwell Robert W. Byrd John P, Connelly Richard "Buzz" David Edward C. Droste Patrick J. Dufly Richard Fitzgerald Gary S. Gray Kenneth G. Hamilton William Heiler Phil M. Henderson Guy Jasmin Gordon L. Johnson Aped N. Justice Jeffrey Martin J. H. McCurtaln, Jr. Aristides Millotes Anne B, Morgan Frank V, Murphy. tll Julie F. Nichols Talmadge Rutledge Daryl J. Seaton Don L, Seaton ' Stephen J. Spencer Ronald W. Stuart David P. Stone R. Cartton Ward James Watrous Douglas J. Williams September 19, 1996 GREATER CLEARWATER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 120 N. OSCEOLA AVE„ P.O. DOX 2437. CLEARWATEP, Fl. 34617. 813/461-00119 FAX 613/449.2889 Jean Sherry City of Clearwater P.Q. Box 2457 Clearwater, FL 34618-4748 Dear Jean: We support the proposed City expansion of the street banner program. Colorful banners are both informative and if well maintained and timely, add to the ambiance of a community. Visitors and residents alike enjoy them if they are done well. It is very important that the banners be changed in a timely fashion and be well maintained to retain their color and message. We look forward to banners throughout the City of Clearwater. yin erem Mark Abdo Guy J Chair, North Area Council Chair, Beach Area Council t t i i O jy 2 0 43 aar ??.. ?T 4 c? C O 4 4t'30A60 ?E"ft Amo 6 Du II? 11 Betty 1 • ?# ltern # CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Meeting Date Agenda Cover Memorandum SUBJECT: Approve a non-exclusive License Agreement for vehicular parking upon a portion of Clearwater Pass Bridge right-of-way with Lane Clearwater, Limited, dlb/a Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort, Clearwater Beach. RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve a non-exclusive License Agreement for vehicular parking upon a portion of City right-of-way easement for Clearwater Pass Bridge with Lane Clearwater, an Illinois Limited Partnership, d/b/a Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort, having a primary term of five years, with an initial year license fee of $3,200 payable $800 quarterly in advance, then $3,600 annually thereafter for the remaining four years, payable $900 quarterly in advance, with the option to extend the License Agreement for four additional terms of five years each, providing for an annual license fee adjustment of not less than three percent (3%) or more than five percent (S%) based on the annual U. S. Department of Commerce Consumer Price Index, being subject to all other provisions as contained therein, 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • On August 26, 1963 the State of Florida granted the City a perpetual right-of-way easement for Clearwater Pass Bridge construction across State jurisdictional lands and waters. • The City licensed a portion of the easement premises for parking purposes to Clearwater Beach Sunset Hotel Associates, Limited, from December 17, 1982 to May 18, 1987. o On May 18, 1987, Lane Clearwater, as successor owner of the resort property, then d/b/a Clearwater Beach Hilton, entered into a non-exclusive License with the City to continue utilizing the premises for parking purposes for an additional five years for an annual fee of $2,400 payable $200.per month. The agreement was amended in March, 1992 and extended the term for five additional months to October 1, 1992, at which time the agreement continued month-to-month thereafter until it terminated May 1, 1995, still at a monthly fee of $200. „ (continued) Reviewed by: Originating Dept, Costs: N/A Commission Action legal _? .. Engineering (Current FYI Approved Budget NIA User Dept. Funding Source: Approved w/conditions Purchasing NIA Capt. Imp. Denied Risk Mgmt. Advertised: Operating Cont'd to 35 /A Date: Other ACM Paper: ENG. Not required: X OTHER -NIA Affected parties Appropriation Code(s) Attachments: notified Submitted By: License Agreement City Ahajg?;W_ Not Required X SunepreeLicense.Agn Page 2 - Agenda Memo continued olida In Suns ee License Agreement + Lane Clearwater, Limited, now operating as the Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort, has agreed to enter into a new five year License Agreement with the City with an initial, year license fee of $3,200, with four succeeding years at $3,600 per year. The Licensee has the option to extend the license term for up to four additional terms of five years each upon providing the City not less than one hundred twenty days notice prior to termination, with an annual rent adjustment of not less than three percent nor more than five percent.based on the U. S. Chamber of Commerce Consumer Price Index. o The License Agreement further provides that: 1) Licensee shall at all times maintain public pedestrian access across its property to the.right-of-way easement for the purposes of fishing, swimming and beach usage by the general public. 2) Licensee shall maintain the premises in compliance with City codes. .3) Licensee shall maintain. insurance as specified in the agreement with the City being named Additional Insured; and, 4) The License may be terminated upon thirty days notice should the State easement grant to the City ever terminate, or should the City require the premises for another purpose. LICENSE 46 THIS LICENSE made this 4 ' day of _ ©a0l e -, 1996, by and between the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a Florida Municipal Corporation C'Licensor"), and LANE CLEARWATER, an Illinois Limited Partnership DB/A HOLIDAY INN SUNSPREE RESORT, having a principal business address at 715 South Gulf Boulevard, Clearwater Beach, Florida 34630 ("Licensee"); 0- (*%#new used herein the terra "Lcentor" and "Licensee" shall Inclmde al! of the parries to this agreement and heirs, legal representatives and assigns ofthe Individuals, and the successors and assigns ofcorporanons) WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on August 26, 1963 Licensor received and continues to possess a perpetual right-of-way easement to certain lands from the State of Florida, of which the License Premises herein described constitute a portion thereof; and, WHEREAS, Licensor presently holds said easement, including the License Premises, in a reserve status until such time as it may be required for public right-of-way purposes; and, WHEREAS, Licensee wishes to have said License Premises licensed to its non- exclusive use for the purposes of vehicle parking; and, WHEREAS, Licensor is agreeable to granting Licensee the privilege and non- ,exclusive use of said premises for the pusposes of vehicle parking; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants herein contained, on the part of the Licensee to be kept and performed, the Licensor does hereby grant a non exclusive parking License to the Licensee for the following described property, a sketch of which is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A": Begin at the S.E. corner of Lot 2, Block D, BAYSIDE SHORES, as recorded in Plat Book 58, Pages 12 and 13 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; Thence run S. 77°37'32" East, 90.00 feet, along the southerly border of said subdivision; Thence run S. 12022` 28" West, along the easterly line of a right-of-way easement for the Clearwater Pass Bridge, as recorded in O.R. Book 1763, Page 432, of said Public Records, 156,18 feet, to a point on a seawall; Thence run northwesterly, elong said seawall, 91.03 feet, more or less, to a point on the westerly line of said right-of-way easement; Thence run N. 12°22'28" East, 153.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 1 of 7 M FEE 43- THIS LICENSE shall extend from the 1 st day of o? 1996 ("Effective Date") for a primary term of five (5) years, with the Licensee paying therefore the initial year annual license fee of Thirty-two Hundred and---No/100's---Dollars ($3,200.00), payable in advance in four quarterly installments of Eight Hundred and--- No/100's---Dollars ($800.00), plus applicable sales taxes, commencing upon the Effective Date hereof. The annual license fee to be paid for the remaining four (4) years of the primary license term shall be Thirty-six hundred and---No/100's---Dollars ($3,600.00), payable in advance in four quarterly installments of Nine Hundred and---No/100's--- Dollars ($900.00), plus applicable sales taxes, commencing upon each anniversary of the Effective Date. In the event this License is extended beyond the primary term, as provided below, the annual license fee shall be adjusted at the end of each year, and each adjustment shall be based on the U.S. Department of Commerce "National Consumer Price Index" for all Urban Consumers, U.S. City Average (CPU-U') indicator, and shall be determined by dividing the CPI-U indicator from the most recently published January indicator prior to the adjustment date, by the CPI-U January indicator published one (1) year prior to the adjustment date, and multiply the resultant number by the yearly license fee amount of the most recent annual fee period. Provided, however, the new annual fee increase amount shall in no case be less than 3% or more than 5% of the most recent annual amount. OTHER CONSIDERATION Licensee further covenants with Licensor that it shall establish and at all times during the psimarputerm hereof, or any extensions thereof, maintain public pedestrian access across Licensee's property to Licensor's right-of-way easement , said access being solely for the purposes of fishing, swimming, and beach usage by the general public. EXTENSIONS Licensee shall have the option to extend this License for a series of four (4) additional terms of five (5) years each so long as it has abided by the terms and conditions of the License and is not in default hereunder. In the event Licensee desires to extend the term of this License, Licensee shall give written notice to Licensor of such intention not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to termination of the primary term or any extension hereof. If timely notice is not provided to Licensor by Licensee as provided herein, all rights granted herein shall terminate and extinguish at 12:00 aclock midnight on the final day of the then current term. In the event Licensee exercises its option to extend this License, the annual fee therefore shall be adjusted as heretofore provided . Page 2 of 7 USE AND MAINTENANCE Licensee covenants and agrees with Licensor that it shall not use the license premises for any other purpose other than the non-exclusive right to park vehicles in conjunction with the operation of the Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort, which is owned and operated by Licensee on property contiguious to the license premises. Licensee further agrees that it shall make no unlawful, improper or offensive use of the license premises, and shall always maintain the premises in compliance with all applicable City of Clearwater codes; and shall quit and deliver up the said premises at the end of the primary term, or any extensions thereto, in as good condition as upon the Effective Date hereof, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Licensee shall make no improvements to the license premises, or otherwise encumber its license interest in the license premises, without the express written consent of duly authorized official(s) of Licensor. Nothing herein contained cliall be construed to require the Licensee to maintain the Licensoe's bridge facility as it presently exists, or may exist in the future, within the public right-of-way of which the license premises are a part; nor shall Licensor be precluded from utilizing any portion of the public right-of-way, including the license premises, for the purposes of providing either routine or extraordinary maintenance of the bridge facility as shall be determined necessary solely by Licensor. LIABILITY & INDEMNIFICATION Licensee agrees to assume all risks of the license premises and all liability therefore, and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Licensor, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all loss, liabblity and damages of whatever nature, to persons and property occasioned by Licensee's negligent or wilful misconduct, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, death of any person and loss of the use of any property except arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of Licensor or Licensoe's agents or employees. This includes, but is not limited to, matters arising out of or claimed to have been caused by or in any manner related to the license premises or Licensee's activities or those of any approved or unapproved invitee, contractor, subcontractor, or other person approved, authorized, or permitted by Licensee in or about the premises, whether or not based on negligence. INSURANCE Licensee shall procure and maintain during the primary term of this license, or any extension thereof, insurance as follows against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with this license: a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. A Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policy covering the license premises and Licensee activities occurring thereon shall be obtained and maintained in force by Licensee. Page 3 of 7 b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Comprehensive General Usability Insurance procured in accordance with this article shall have minimum coverage limits of $500,OOO Bodily Injury and $100,000 with respect to property damage arising out of any one (1) occurance. Such insurance policy shall be carried in a company licensed to do business in the State of Florida. c. Additional Named Insured. Each insurance policy issued as a requirement of this license shall name the City of Clearwater as additional insured. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of the protection afforded to the Licensor, its officers, employees or volunteers. d. verification of Coverage Licensee shall furnish the Licensor with Certificates of Insurance with all endorsements affecting coverage required by this article. These forms shall be approved by the Licensor's Risk Manager prior to execution of this License by authorized City officials. e. Maintenance f overa a The insurance coverages and conditions afforded by the policies required hereby shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled or modified except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. f. "Blanket Policy". Licensee's obligation to carry the insurance provided herein may be brought within the coverage of a "blanket policy" of insurance carried and maintained by Licensee; providing, however, that the coverages afforded the Licensor shall not be reduced or diminished or otherwise be different from that which would have existed under a separate policy meeting all other requirements of this License. ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES Licensee, at its expense, shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and Local environmental laws, and shall not allow the storage, use, disposal, or discharge by itself or others, of any contaminants or hazardous materials on or about the license premises. However, Licensee shall have no liability or responsibility for removal or remediation of any hazardous or toxic. substances or underground storage tanks or any underground structures or conditions, if any,. existing prior to the grant of this license, or coming onto the license premises by actions of parties other than Licensee, its agents, employees and invitees, during the term of this license. Page 4 of 7 DEFAULT/TERMINATION This License may be terminated by the parties under the following circumstances and in the following manner: a. By Licensor: This license is subject to termination by Licensor in the event of material default by Licensee in the performance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this License, and in the failure of Licensee to remedy, or undertake to remedy to Licensor's reasonable satisfaction, such default for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of notice from Licensor to remedy same, or if Licensor's underlying easement is terminated in whole or in part for any reason; or should Licensor determine that a competing municipal need exists for the premises; or should Licensee vacate or abandon premises, or at such time as Licensoe's easement rights are extinguised for any reason. In the event of any of the foregoing occurances, and delivery or mailing of Notice as above provided, all rights granted herein shall immediately extinguish and terminate, unless any time frame is provided to the contrary, and the License premises shall revert fully to Licensor as though this License had never been granted. b. By Licensee: This license is subject to termination by Licensee in the event of material default by Licensor in the performance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this License, and in the failue of Licensor to remedy, or undertake to remedy to Licensee's reasonable satisfaction, such default for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of notice from Licensee to remedy same. c. By Either Party: Either party may terminate this license upon providing the other party not less than sixty (60) days written notice of its intent to terminate. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given when mailed, postage paid, or personally delivered. NOTICE Any notice shall.be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or sent by United States Registered Mail, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: Licensor City Manager City of Clearwater P. O, Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl. 34618-4748 Licensee General Manager Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort 715 South Gulfview Boulevard Clearwater Beach, Fl. 34630 Page 5 of 7 Such addresses may be changed from time to time by either party by giving notice as provided above. Notice shall be deemed given when delivered (if delivered by hand), or when postmarked if sent U. S. Mail, certified, return receipt requested. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES This License constitutes the entire agreement of the parties regarding the premises described herein, and may not be changed, modified or discharged except by written amendment duly executed by both parties. Licensee agrees that no representations or warranties shall be binding upon Licensor unless expressed in writing herein or in a duly executed amendment hereof. Further, Licensor does not warrant and hereby disclaims any and all liability and responsibility for or on account of the condition of the premises, or any portions thereof, or for or on account of anything affecting such conditions. ASSIGNMENT This License, or any right or interest granted herein, may not be assigned, transferred or sub-licensed by Licensee without the consent of the Licensor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. It is mutually understood that Licensor may, at any time, with notice, assign or delegate any or all of its rights hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their ands and seals this day of 1996. Countersigned: Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Page 6 of 7 i l E " Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of .r ? WITNESS signature. / ?Cr ? JG TypeJPrint witness' na WI S signa e Type Print witness' name LANE 'CLEARWATER, an Illinois Limited Partnership, ddbla HOLIDAY FP By: Prix Titl ex, -T,&' .w Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: John Carassas, Assistant City Attorney t Page 7 of 7 f5 604e rw 1 P? ?•fN¢? ! -sue -s- r r 4 1 ? / rt i_? ?? ?.,lr ! tt ? •ti tr ! _- -N;:_ i 4Y q 4 1 f 1 t 4 ! 1 1 . 1 h r -300lue MAN -?. i 0. ? r ? u Y i ft O ?? a 1ri y ,. M ? r. J r ? i N ? 4 ? } u w r r 1 •4118 f{1? ya ? 1-1 F --7 r ?. l h 1 •r J? 1 ,Ir / ..?y 1 J • ! I _ - h J ?.1 ?`1 ••. ? f ?' ter. l' ?•Cjj1 t- ? ? ?? 1? / rri !)i' i 1 1 s4• !! 11 1 F 1 t t 1 1F r 1 1 f ?h ,!?/?,; y?' *S ? / ? sas?waad asuaal? ! hti j !f ? 1 ? 1 i? 1 f r !I Ya f1 YY r1 YY 1 Y ; ti .r , •' la Yy L` a? September 24, 1996 Elizabeth M. Deptula City Manager L' City of Clearwater P. 0. Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl. 34618.44748 RE: Term of License Agreement Dear Mrs. Deptula: As provided in the NOTICE article on page 7 of the License Agreement for vehicular parking the Clearwater City Commission will consider granting to Lane Clearwater, Ltd. in October, I have been asked to initial a change in the initial term date inserted in. original documents from September 1, 1996 to October 4, 1996. ;_. As requested by City staff, I am initialing the change on behalf of the partnership with the understanding that while I am not an officer of-the partnership, it is acceptable with City legal staff that I act for the partnership, and that the change will allow the matter to be duly considered at the next meeting of the City Commission. Sincerely, Vini K. Gupta, CHA General Manager Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort Clearwater Beach, F1. ?t5 5. C4itF41 FEW g4JD . caE wR-??? Re-mik, k a463e Tom: ?53?- 44-7- gS66 .? bell) # CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Meeting Dale Agenda Cover Memorandum ? o SUBJECT: Marshall St. Wastewater Treatment Plaint (WWTP) Odor Control & Piping Modifications (96-20) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve award of the Marshall Street Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Odor Control & Piping Modifications to WESTRA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION of PALMETTO, FLORIDA in the amount of $1,263,000.00 being the lowest and most responsive bid received in accordance with plans and specifications, x and dtit the appropriate officials be authorized to execute saute. SUMMARY: The primary purpose of this contract is to implement improvements to the Marshall Street Advanced Pollution Control Facility influent pump station and headworks which will reduce odors in and around the headworks of the facility. These improvements consist of rearranging influent piping, pump and motor control up-grades and adding fiberglass covers to open channels of the grit removal system. The construction activities at the Marshall Street Facility will also include repair of concrete flow channels in the grit removal structure and construction of a submersible filter feed pump station to reduce long term operation and maintenance of the existing screw pump station. + The contract work will also include repairs at the Northeast Advanced Pollution Control Facility (APCF) to repair leakage in the reclaimed water storage tank and to repair a leak between the fermentation tank and its influent structure. + The work is scheduled to begin on or about Nov. 4, 1996 and be completed within 225 consecutive calendar days. + $1,300,000.00 was transferred at third quarter from Capital project 315-96632, Sanitary Sewer R&R, to Capital Project 315-96631, Water Pollution Control R&R, in order to fund this project. Costs: $1.263.000.0Q Commission Action Reviewed by: Originating Dept. Legal Budget fA Purchasing Risk Mgmt. NIA IS AC EN( OT ENGINEERING DEPT,/]z/ User Dept. Advertised: Date: 08106(96_8, 08/14 96 Paper: ST. PETERSBURG TIMES Not required- {Current FY} Funding Source: Capt. Imp. X - Operating Other Approved Approved wlconditions Denied Cont`d to Submitted By- Ci rage Affected parties notified Not Required x Appropriation Code{s} I Attachments: 315-96631-563600-535-000 Bid Tabulation & Summary Marl"ll 5t. I Rev. 984198 M ARSHALL STREET WWTP ODOR CONTROL AND PIPING MODIFICATIONS (96-20) BID OPENING -WED., SEPT. 11, AWARD - THURSDAY, OCTOBE R 3, 1996 WESTRA CONST R. CORP. CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, INC. PALMETTO, FL SARASOTA, FL. BID ITEMS QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT REROUTING BAYFRONT PUMP STATION FORCE MAIN FROM THE GRIT REMOVAL STRUCTURE TO THE SPLI77ER BOX AT THE INFLUENT PUMP 1 STATION (MARSHALL ST. WWTP) 1 L.S. S 235,000.00 S 235,000.00 $ 109,000.00 $ 109,000.00 UPGRADING WASTEWATER PUMPS AND DISCHARGE PIPING IN THE INFLUENT PUMP STATION (MARSHALL 2 ST. WWTP) 1 L.S. $ 350,000.00 S 350,000.00 $ 467,000.00 S 467,000.00 ODOR CONTROL UPGRADE FOR THE GRIT REMOVAL STRUCTURE, INCLUDING FIBERGLASSS COVERS, TWO EXHAUST FANS, AND FIBERGLASS AIR EXHAUST DUCT 3 (MARSHALL ST. WWTP) 1 L.S. $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 170,000,00 $ 170,000.00 REPAIRING THE CONCRETE EFFLUENT CHANNEL IN THE GRIT REMOVAL 4 STRUCTURE (MARSHALL ST. WWTP) 1 L.S. S 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 67,000.00 $ 67,000.00 CONSTRUCT SAND FILTER FEED PUMP 5 STATION (MARSHALL ST. WWTP) 1 L.S. S 285,000.00 $ 285,000.00 $ 358,000.00 $ 358,000.00 CONSTRUCT AIR RELEASE AND VACUUM VALVE MANHOLE ON THE EXISTING BAYFRONT FORCE MAIN NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF CEDAR STREET AND THE PINELLAS TRAIL 6 (MARSHALL ST. WWTP) 1 L.S. $ 15,000.00 S 15,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 CONSTRUCT AIR RELEASE AND VACUUM VALVE MANHOLE ON THE EXISTING SAYFRONT FORCE MAIN NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF MARSHALL STREET AND THE PINELLAS 7 TRAIL (MARSHALL ST WWTP) 1 L.S. S 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF THE SPUTTER BOX FOR THE FERMENTATIONIANOXIC TANKS 8 (NORTHEAST WWTP) 1 L.S. S 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 S 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 REPAIR OF LEAKAGE IN THE RECLAIMED WATER STORAGE TANK INCLUDING BY-PASS PIPING DEWATERING THE GROUND UNDER THE TANK, DEWATERING THE TANK, 9 INSPECTION, AND STARTUP 1 L.S. $ 142,000.00 S 112,000.00 S 52,000.00 S 52,000.00 INJECT CHEMICAL GROUT UNDER FLOOR OF RECLAIMED WATER 10 STORAGE TANK (NORTHEAST WWTP) 100 C.Y. $ 200.00 $ 20,000.00 S 1,220.00 $ 122,000.00 INJECT EPOXY GROUT IN CRACKS IN FLOOR OF RECLAIMED WATER 11 STORAGE TANK (NORTHEAST WWTP) 30 C.Y. S 200.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 40.00 S 1,200.00 INSTALLING PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES IN THE FLOOR OF THE RECLAIMED WATER STORAGE TANK (NORTHEAST 12 WVVTP) 4 EACH $ ' 1,250.00 S 5,000.00 S 1,500.00 S 6,000.00 HI DDER'S GRAND TOTAL $ 1,263,000.00 $ 1,428,200.00 BIDS SOLICITED - 30 Contractors Picking Up Plans S Specs - 5 Contractors Submitting Bids - 2 No Rosponse - 3 Indian River Ind., Contractors, Inc. Ttemminge & Roodvoets, Inc. TLC DlverslW. Inc. a8 Rent 4 n C? CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date a 3 SUBJECT: Island Estates Reclaimed Water System, Test of Horizontal Directional Boring Method RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award contract for test installation of reclaimed water main using horizontal directional drilling on Windward Passage to Kimmins Contracting Corporation of Tampa, Florida in the amount of $60,360.00 in accordance with code section 2.564 (D), other governmental, bid El and t1tat the appropriate officials be audiorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • Final construction contract documents are being prepared for the installation of a reclaimed water distribution system and the replacement of small diameter potable water mains on Island Estates. The water main pipe installation method of horizontal directional drilling (HDD) is proposed for this project due to the extensive landscaping and extended variety of decorative architectural features located in the rights-of-way on Island Estates. Hillsborough County is presently using the HDD method with Kimmins Contracting Corporation to install a reclaimed water distribution system in its Avilla Subdivision which has similar landscaping and architectural features to island Estates. The HDD method was used in the recently completed installation of large diameter utility mains across Clearwater Harbor and Clearwater Pass. Small diameter shallow depth HDD installations have been done by TimefWamer and GTEtMedia Ventures in the construction of their new video cable systems. The Hillsborough County Avilla project has been observed to gauge the success of HDD in the installation of medium diameter (6" to 10" pipe size) and shallow depth (30" of ground cover over top of pipe) pipe installation. This installation method has been highly successful, however the soil conditions and depth of the water table are different on Island Estates from those observed in Hillsborough County. The Engineering Department believes that an actual HDD field test installation of 8" pipe on Island Estates in advance of the full construction project is warranted. The pipe to be installed in this test is in the final plan for the reclaimed water main system so will not increase the final cost of the project. continued Ravlowed by, Legal -- Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt. NA Is NA ACM 46 ENG. OTHER Odginating Dept. Engineering G User Dept. `G Public Works T Advertised: Costs: $60.380.00 Commission Action (Current FY) Approved Funding Source: Approved w/conditions Capt. Imp. X Denied Operating Cont'd to Other Appropriation Code(s) Attachments: 315.96739.5637QQ-5,33-OC)Q Agreement Memo Submitted ti : Cite r Date: Paper: Not required: x Affected parties notified Not Requirod x t IDD TfsST ISLAND Page Two Agenda Item - Island Estates Reclaimed Water System, Test of Horizontal Directional Boring Method Agenda Item • Kimmins has agreed to honor its active unit contract price with Hillsborough County of $55.00 per unit foot of pipe to install 1000 feet of 8" polyethylene pipe on Island Estates. Hillsborough County is currently using pipe dimensioned to IPS (International Pipe Size Standard) while Clearwater uses the much more common DIP Standard (Ductile Iron Pipe Size Standard) for all of its water main installations. The difference is that the pipe material is thicker and requires more material per foot of pipe for the DIP standard. The additional manufacturer's supply cost of pipe to Kimmins for the DIP standard polyethylene pipe is $5.36 per foot of pipe. • The Hillsborough County contract was selected for "piggyback" of bid because this is the only active contract known to be performing the shallow HDD pipe installation method using water main sized pipe. • Location of test pipe installation is proposed for Windward Passage. , The test pipe will be incorporated into the final reclaimed water distribution system. Full restoration is included in the unit price of pipe. • The available balance in Capital Improvement Project, 315-96739, Reclaimed Water Distribution System, is adequate to fund this project, C September 23, 1996 Fax 562-4755 Mr. Tent' Jennings, P.E., Olef Engineer . City of Clearwater Engineeft Department P.Q. Box 4748 Clearwater, Flodda 34418 Reference: Island Estates Reclaimed Water System Dear Mr, Jennings: We are in foil agreenu m with the contents of the contract documents and technical sped8cat!ons for the "Test Directional Boring Island Bates Reclaimed Water System', CRY Protect No. IS 120795. We are in agreement that our price is $60,360.00 far the furnishing and installation of 1000 LF 8" ME SDRI I DIP size. If any additional Information is needed, please feel free to contact rne. very truly yours, KIMMINS Co CTING CORP. V ' n V. Simon, )r- esident JVS:crb xc: File 15012.. STD AVENUE • TAMPA, FLORIDA 33605 • (813) 248-3878 • FAX (813) 247.0183. "An Equal Opportunity Employer" Clearwater City Commission Item #: 3 (0 r = Agenda Cover Memorandum . Meeting Date: SUBJECT: Appointment to the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Reappoint Commissioner Karen Seel to the PPC for a 2 year term expiring 12/31198 ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Commissioner Seel's term on the PPC expires 12131196. She is willing to be reappointed if the Commission so desires. The new term will be for two years, 1997 and 1998. Reviewed by: Originating Department: Commission Action: Legal NA City Clark costs: ? Approved Budget NA Total ? Approved with Conditions Purchasing NA User Department: ? Denied Risk Mgmt. NA Current Fiscal Year O Continued to: is NA Funding Source: ACM _ ? Capital improvement Other NA Advertised: CI Operating Date: G Other: Attachments: M Paper: Submitted by: ? Not Required Appropriation Code 913196 letter from PPC Affected Parties f ? Notified ? None ymanager ? Not Required 0i Printed on recycled paper 11111111 i 3CD PLANNING COUNCIL COUNCIL MEMBERS Ms. Betty Depdrla City Manager City of Clearwater P.O. Boot 4148 ' Clearwater, FL 34618-4748 Commisaioner Jean Halvorsen, Ohm. Councilmember Chuck 11011ams, VIce Chm. RECEIVED Mayor oeoW M. Jimd, 'Reps. CorrYriasloner Tom Osborne, Sac, Cwvrisslomr Karen Bn yboy SEP 0 41996 school Board Member Barbara J. Croda t Mayor Tom De Ceaar? Conrrdasbnor Don Fla1cMr CITY MANAGER Coj%W wmber Robert Kerstw counaunernber Daryl Lands r Canrdo C. Mudpno 1? . C E I ' Corrmisaiortar Karen Seri r Robert M Stewart SEP 0 5 1996 David P. Healey, AICP ExaculNe Dhdor CITY CLERIC DEPT. . Re: Dear This b to ,'mired you that, all current appointments to the Planning Council expire on December 31, 1996. Qtr Special Act calls for all subsequent appointments to be made biennially on or before January 1 of the year following the expiration of the term. The appointmemtwiIl be effective for the two year period, 1997 through 1998. Current members are eligible for reappointment and I urge you to coordinate this action with your current representative, Commissioner Karen Seel. It would be very helpful to our process if you could schedule this item for action by your Commission and advise us of same prior to November 30, 1996. Thank you for your assistance. 'h Sincerely, o-?David P. Healey Executive Director CC Comrnissioner Karen Seel, PPC Representative r. 14 SO. FT. HARRISON AVE., SUITE 3010 • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34616 TELEPHONE (813) 464-3855 FAX (813) 464.3827 September 3, 1996 f Item #31 fs o: . 4 i PREPARED BY AND RETURN T0. 31 R. CARLTON WARD, ESQUIRE Richards, Gilkey, Fite Slaughter, Pratesi & Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 34616 AMP8D A1+1D RNSTA2EV OD F C TIO OF-BASEMENT THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED MODIFICATION OF EASEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of , 1996, by and between SUN WATCH, INC., a Florida corporation, 670 Island Way, Clearwater, Florida, 34634; ("Grantor") and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida, 34618-4748 ("Grantee"). WHEREAS, Grantor has previously granted and conveyed to Grantee a Water Main Easement across specific real property as described in that certain Easement recorded in O.R. Book 8887, beginning at Page 2143, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, (the "Easement"); and WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee did previously modify the Easement to amend the property encumbered by the easement by substituting a new Exhibit "All to the Easement and having Grantee quit claim, convey and release unto Grantor all of its right, title and interest in the former Exhibit "A" property, by a Modification of Easement recorded in O.R. Book 9091, Page 1295, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Modification of Easement contained certain typographical errors in its body with reference to the recording of the Easement and with regard to the legal description attached as Exhibit "A" thereto, which the parties wish to correct; and WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee desire to amend the Easement to modify the legal description contained therein. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby amend and restate the Modification of Easement as follows: 1. The above recitals incorporated herein as true and correct. 2. The parties do hereby amend the Easement and restate the Modification of Easement by substituting the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein for the property previously described in the Easement and Modification of Easement and Grantor does hereby grant and convey to Grantee an Easement over, under and across the property described in Exhibit "AN attached hereto for water 31 facilities installation and maintenance and Grantee shall have the right to. enter upon the described premises and to construct, install and maintain thereon any water facilities and to inspect and alter such facilities from time to time. 3. Grantee does hereby quitclaim, transfer and release unto Grantor all right, title and interest that it may have in the property described in the Easement as recorded in O.R. Book 8887, beginning at Page 2143., the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida and being further described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed by its proper officers thereunto authorized and its seal to be hereunto affixed the day and date indicated. Signed, sealed and delivered in the pr ce of: LULL Print Name of Witness Print Name of Wiitness SUN WATCH, INC., a Florida corporation By:, r AJ Name : f'r l , Title: Vice Presi ent (SEAL) signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Print Name of Witness Print Name of Witness STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: Name: Title: (SEAL) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 6th day of SePtember , 1996 by Franc Baccilieri ?i ti 31 as Vice President of SUN WATCH, INC., a Florida corporation who is personally known to me or w o produced n/a as identificatio . lb- ttt Name: Laura Gottschalk No ary Public My Commission Exp Lan G,q901* W SSM 1=12M7 EXPl F UUq 2S MOO ; STATE OF FLORIDA;;,' won COUNTY OF PINELLAS ' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1995 by as of THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA who is personally known to me or who produced as identification . Print Name: Notary Public My Commission Expires: RCW:lrg wp51lmiscdocsrsunwatch.amd :¦ I e EXHIBIT "A" 31 Commence at the Southwesterly corner of Lot 71 of Unit 8, "ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER", as recorded in Plat Book 64, Pages 73 and 74, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and run S.72deg.30100"W., a distance of 100.00 feet to a point of the Westerly Right-of-Way line of Island Way; thence run along said Right-of--Way line and along the arc of a curve to the right, concave to the Northeast having a radius of 6202.29 feet, an arc length of 260.50 feet, a chord length of 260.48 feet and a chord bearing of N.16deg.01118"W.; thence continue along said Right-of- Way along a curve to the right that has a radius of 6202.29 feet, an arc length of 170.31 feet, a chord length of 170.31 feet and a chord bearing of N.14deg.01155"W; thence continue along the arc of a curve to the right, concave'to the Northeast having a radius of 13696.00 feet, delta 00deg.5711411, an arc length of 228.01 feet, a chord length of 228.01 feet, and a chord bearing of N.12deg.54153"W. to the Point of Beginning. Thence from said Point of Beginning the following four (4) courses: 1) S.77deg.41158"W. 22.00 feet; 2) N.12deg.2213011W. 30.00 feet; 3) N.77deg.41158"E. 22.00 feet to a point on a curve; 4) Along the ,arc. of a curve to the left, concave to the Northeast, radius 13696.00 feet, delta 00deg.0713211 , arc 30.00 feet, chord bearing S.12deg.22130"E. 30.00 feet to the aforementioned Point of Beginning. Containing 0.0151 acres, more or less. f, , SKETCH AND DESCRIP TION WRIER EASEMENY, PORTION OF SEC. 5, TWP, 29 S, RNG. /5-E PINELLNS COUNTY, FLORIDA rM ? Oise sTT?ts.oa . +rgr$r rl R • 4 M"!A sp, -4l+riRr. cr+.te N u, :1 Ir /M11 A. ,94.01.,;A 4, 1A 1,0R.011* ¦•tr 7+' ?• we R • tr0.bAJ0 Cr'• Ct/A rR' ?_ ,..?Me ? 4• KMXIrtlr or N21rt 0son it c191r/4'9 al I' 11"W011TtLl C6419 CAF War I a Mar 1. '191J1e tsfal" 0 CLUI.alu., L 1"m to nit 1001 it, raca9 I! W 11 q 101 rI rLIC Irv," a 1,11"m C"', ILm" . AN. 14! 1 11'J4'q'r. ¦ .",W.t M ILL 14 xI is $6 POI.T Os 499 K91r11T rrLIT•v•4Al LIr9 Is 7SLN91171 MWA Ile ALM fall. 11O1T•0r•1AT LIPS Ars ALn46 Tie W M A CL771 we r/t @IA1r CMKA11 10 T11 16TI0IAIT 4Ar114 A slelei or 11el.N raw. N Apt u1m, of M.$4 IICT. A CMS [ACTS or 141.41 1i1 1" A, C-01 ITA1116 M l. 11'01'11. 111 tyc" Ce4TIPC "a" IAre rlrm-M •1A7 Luft 1 CY19t 10 111 elm? T1AI IAT a filled of 11.1.1. 19911 Y AAC LCerRS 011 IMJI 11:0. it Crime Long to 110 it FM AM A Clw¦ IL 1!114 p 1 71.44'1)'11 INK COl.ill.lrs Am Tic AIC M a Clllr4 r• 199 ol.t. Mi11rCAlI t6 T9r 004TSSM1 s1r11e A 6A11et or Ili}1,11 1trl, sCL1A 401'1'11•, l.1 me Ltmm Cr 111.11 Itlt. A c"ll rL41e s 11%.L1 fail &" A a"* 111.1,96 M e ir•II'll• V. 16 leg 011111 h Vel091M Tax% $so% Ills "I" to, Tt6lnlls m rOL1.01100 raw 111 CEP 41131 II t 1!'11'!4• s, 11,41 roll 71 0 11'17'71• r, JAM roll at s 1/'/4' 1. 1. 1 it fm. to A rr11eT on A CLSrMI 41 1119.1 794 Age er A CIMTt Is T11 WT, COKA,I 10 1*2 e71110131 11I41vMIill1,H 11117, 14LIA 1144'41'4[•. AMC 10,64 r?i1, CMOs "W94 9 11'11'11. 1. Wes Am i•1 in ArpltltP11001e 00107 Or 440I411M. lFGENa A cvrAln , $Jail ACJLS. 1AwI ON tut. A'rZ?[IB6£wAnavs s. mom, s w SOU7N, E - EAST IY As 11ESr R .. RADIUS A r (: (AIJ.ME?SU1r(U 0E0ICNS1aV POO - PLVNr q- 8mmiNOA a - PROPERTY LINE Cal . CJWD D . Mt?A (0)j M& ixurNSjoN POC - POW OF CQ41AI£NC£A1ENT, € - C£NrER1/N£ CO - 01000 DEM40a NOT A SURIn' - -------------------------------------- MICHAEL BAKER ASSOCIA TES. INC. LAND SURVEYORS and PLANNERS 9 SOUTH SAMORD AVENUE ? , ` TARPCN SPRING, FLORIDA 34689 9`• •4 (e(,iJ DJA»301d 1 fAX? (d11) D1A-[Sad DAI . 3-8.99 SC4M..- IAA= 301 I NFRLSY CERWY 1NAT 1W DCSCSrrnov MrrOl RIPRMNIM f7EV15lON 9-16.96 EI+15 O? piAP1CR IfGl7-Q? FA.C nCE. ORAAW 8" I.G. IX doff, FIO KM RCG. A6. 4089F WC =AN07 page 2 SECTION S , nyv. zqs., RANCEIsE I 0 z RrA; O10.00'!0) RI 15 F1G. 0040. O'o?•e t" A- 1P.00, eel SiVr1'e0'e SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WATER EASEMENT". PoRT/ON OF SEC. 5, TWP. 29 S, RNG. 15 E PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA ' +4- I'l Slt.00 D • 0'!'31, 10, Oey' of • cm. ca•sIl•a7'j1'C k r< 77'21 ER E. w° OS.oo O•e N ti • S-17 • x`•r N "'^• Ir•1]il6.e0.11•0'ff W. •naDr' cM•ne.or' ? .? A ej - A. "31 kv lop '.v. 11 'A "r. R • 170. ]r' CM. /70.11' ce • m rf' •e 1 , of • 'ac. .10 Gr•Ci6.0 DESCRIPTION Or HIMOT 1.TSfIftlrr TO 711C AfOMLI:CMTlUNEO POINT OF BEGINNIMO. CONTAINS 111 SCUM FEET. MORE OR LESS. COnM M AT TII6 SOUTIIVESTERLT CORNER Or LOT,7, or UNIT 4, GISLA110 ESTATES Or CLEARVATER', AS RECORDED IM PLAT 4OOK 61, PAGES 1) AND 71, or THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF P;NELLAS COVIM, FLORIDA, AND RUN S.FDA A DISTANCL OF 100.00 FELT, TO A POINT ON TILE VESTERLT RIGIIT•OF•VAT LINE. ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT THAT HAS A RADIUS or 6207.13 FEET, AM ARC LENGTH OF 260.50 FEET, A CHORD LENGTH Or 760.11 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF N.lf'OL'14"W.; TIIENCE CONT;NUC ALONG SAID RICIIT-OF•VAT ALONG A CUM TO THE RIGHT TIIAT WAS A RADIUS Of $201.21 FEET; AN ARC LEIIGTH Or 170.]! FEET, A CAM LENCTI: Or 170.71 FECF ANA A CHORO• ISMING Or N.II'O1'SS'V.; THENCE CONTINUE A6011G SAID RIGHT-Or-VAT ALONG A CURVE TO Tilt RIGHT, CONCAVI< TO 711C NORTHEAST RADIUS 17616.00 FEET, DELTA 00111111', ARC 174.01 FEET, CHORD WRING N 13'01191• V, 176.01 FEET TO TIIC POINT Or BECIMMING. THENCE FAUN SAID POIIIT TAE FOLLOWING FOUR 111 COURSES: 11 S 71'71'26• V, 15.00 FEET; 11 N 11'!7'31• V, 10.90 FEET; 31 M 77'11'26' t, MOO FEET. TO A POINT ON A CURve; 11 ALONG THE ARC Or A CURVE TO TIIE LErr, COMCAVC TO THE NORTHEAST RADIUS 33656.00 FEET. DELTA 00'01'31•, ARC 10.00 FEET, cum BEARING S 11']7'31• c, 10.00 FEET ¦ .. 1 •. .,.A+)Lm H >:Onnl a ANXUS S SOUTH CH .. CIIDIID I wm CB - CHORD 50 AM C + 037 PM .. PONT Or CODUENCEML141 A •• PAC POIl - POINT Or IMMA"O D - DELTA 111C..X . Tlrt. C! 5.. Am. 13'.L. N w b SoVrxwtrriwlr edveerr Of for I: o/ tw,r t, IltRMp MAW 0/ cl ulfbI A NOT A SURVEY - - -------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- MI C! IAEL BAKER ASSOCIA TES, INC. LAND 'SURVEYORS and PLANNERS .. 9 SOUTH! SAFFORD AVENUE TARPON LORIDA 34689 ;?•? ?. ti ? ?' ? ?t? (613? 93a-'302 ? , ?? 9`w`-2366 '?. r• ? DATE: 7/11/24' SCALE: I •• ! ' ~ FIE. • n+1rcM.xx DRAWN BY: - M MIA REC. N.. +oa'$ D+?s- L. i 3a Pre aced by & return to: Ear Barrett Real Estate Services Mgr. City of Clearwater P. 0. Box 4748 Clearwater, F1. 34618-4748 E A S E M E N T FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) cash in hand paid to them, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the benefits to be derived therefrom, Daniel H. Milton and Virginia L. Milton, husband and wife 3044 Eastwood Drive Clearwater, Florida 34619--4311 do hereby grant and convey to the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, an easement over, under and across the following described land, lying and being situate in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wit: The' East Five Feet (51) of the North Fifteen Feet (151) of the South Thirty Feet (301) of the following described property: Begin at the Southwest corner of the Northwest 'H of the North- west 4 of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, and run thence South 89°27'56" East along the 40 acre line, 669.05 feet; thence North 00°37'03" East, 90.14 feet, for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run North 00°37'0311 East, 98.0 feet; thence North 89°27'56" West, 100.0 feet; thence run South 00°37f03" West, 98.0 feet; thence run South 89°27'56" East, 100.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This easement being for water main installation and maintenance. The CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, shall have the right to enter upon the above described premises and to construct, install and maintain thereon any water facilities and to inspect and alter such water facilities from time to time. b' 9AJ'%3C&0. ?PR "t" 4 irit?JEn-oat M s k4LL ? Psr`oneo( r- v1?.tv?i coAdr,,`r^." i? r__" i4AA.:e_ ? Premise:s ?4?E. ?f ?a, &.A , 06"'W IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party hereto has caused these presents to )e duly executed by its proper officers thereunto authorized and its seal to be hereunto affixed, this ?,__,_ day of September, 1996. 3D- Page 2 - Water main Easement Grantor: Daniel H. & Virginia L. Milton Grantee: City of Clearwater, Florida Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: irlITRSS 4 Wi + Praia's signature WITNESS W tness' Pr nta s gnature w Daniel H. Milton 8 ? Z ? ?- ?- - - 6 -?nd- Z2 Virginia L. Milton STATE OF FLORIDA : COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ?11? day of Septpn}ber, 1996 by Daniel. H. Milton. ,?,VtY PGA OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL No My Public - State of Flo da o <? BAHL W EARRM Type/print name * COMC MISSION N 656 UMBER T. ?p MY COMMISSION EXP. Uersonally Known of iLO MAY 26 lm [ Produced Identification Type of Identification produced STAE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of September, 1996 by Virginia L. Milton. 6??,V1Y PV6 OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL xp <, EARL W BARRETT 4;?4 1A- ?K -- 11 No ary Public -- Sta of Flor * COMMISSION NUMBER Type/print name„-- .. 4_ 4V, - - '? my COMA SS ON F.XP. T I-4 .OF f%.0 MAY 26 1996 [ ] ersonally Known [ roduced Identification Type of Identification produced_ tj. -EXHIBIT" A" WATER MAIN EASEMENT 31?1- GRANTOR: Daniel H. & Virginia L. Milton GRANTEE: City of Clearwater, Florida o , I L W Wv *A aao. - ?, L_ EASTWOOD f 4 DRIVE E f r *V 114 Of s=i;_1* A 3?_' AFFIDAVIT OF NO LIENS STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLA.S BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Daniel H. Milton and Virginia L. Milton, husband and wife, whom, being first duly sworn, depose and say: 1. That they are the owners of legal and equitable title to the following described property in Pinellas County, Florida, to wit: The East Five Feet (51) of the North Fifteen Feet (151) of the South Thirty Feet (301) of the following described property: Begin at the Southwest corner of the Northwest 4 of the North- west % of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, and run thence South 89°27'56" East along the 40 acre line, 669.05 feet; thence North 00°37'03" East, 90.14 feet, for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run North 00°37'03" East, 98.0 feet; thence North 89°27'56" West, 100.0 feet; thence.run South 00°37'03" West, 98.0 feet; thence run South 89°27'56" East, 100.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 2. That said property is now in the possession of the record owner. 3. That there has been no labor performed or materials furnished on said property for which there are unpaid bills for labor or materials against said property, except: NONE 4. That there are no liens or encumbrances of any nature affecting the title of the property hereinabove described, except: NONE 5. That it is hereby warranted that no notice has been received for any public hearing regarding assessments for improvements by any government, and it is hereby warranted that there are no unpaid assessments against the above property for improvements thereto by any government, whether or not said assessments appear of record. 6. That there is no outstanding sewer service charges or assessments payable to any government. i 32, 7. That the representations embraced herein are for the purpose of inducing CITY OF CLEARWATER, its agents, successors and assigns to rely thereon. r J' SS Dane H. Milton r) 2A19- L. (0 r.? f. Witne?s' Printed Signature WITNESS Virginia L. Milton Witness' Pz nted Signature Sworn to and subscribed to before me this -{----? day of September, 1996. Type ure of person taking ac FArl W. mot Ror my commh? Expirm OSRW 1104 ?2[QT+1AY. !!i e or ran , Y' ?'T»1?Y?:';"' any EXHIBIT "A" WATER MAIN EASEMENT GRANTOR: Daniel H. & Virginla L. Milton GRANTEE: City of Clearwater. Florida 1 ? 1 1 1 1 1 1 a . I 1 1 1 ti' Ivan OX 3= - R+ EASTWOOD rare r DRIVE 1 1 *w r14 op AW 11s ?s "-u ' 32- R 4 33 INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY1Ak8 Kathleen C. Lanzner, P.L.S. Cumbey & Fair, Inc. 2463 Enterprise Road Clearwater, FL 34623 RETURN TO: City Clerk City of clearwater INGRESS EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT P.O. Box-4748 Clearwater, FL. 34618-4748 THIS INDENTURE made this day of 0&69r--, 1996 between McDonald's Corporation, D.B.A. McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware Company, whose mailing address is 4830 West Kennedy Blvd, Suite 395, Tampa, FL 33609, party of the first part and The City of Clearwater, Florida, a municipal corporation, whose mailing address is 10 South Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, FL 34616, party of the second part. WITNESSETH, that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, does hereby create, grant and convey unto the party of the second part a perpetual easement for ingress, egress and public utility purposes over, under and across the following described lands lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit: Lands described in legal descriptions and sketches attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the party of the first part has caused this instrument to be executed as of the day and year first above written. r. I!'-° Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of. pa u rA, SHA-tH # ?+ LeP e-, C L of ""-z- ri e,- McDonald's Corporation D.B.A. McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware Corporation By; c. J es Dunkle Assistant Construction Manager Tampa Bay Region r 33 l: I, .: ; STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of S?-1' 1 • , 1996 by ?R ES 'Du I L who is personally known to me ar who lies produced Wenflfieal;eoz (Notary Seal) PEGGY A. GLOVER NO blic f ictury PLVic. Stale of Ronda My Comm. Ex ' Jan. 7,1999 (,'?' LQYER GC 427'99! No. 42 9W(I rial NvIsrp Dendcs :-WC)723-0121 (Name printed) My commission expires: Commission No.: EXHIBIT A The East 20 feet of the North 30 feet of the South 110 feet of Lot 1, SUNSET OAKS according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 89, Page 01 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. S3 Note: This is not a survey[ Not to scale i I i ' I f i . W l } f Lot 1 < Sunset Oaks I c P.B. 89 - P. 01 W I I ? -1 I W .._..J '^ U I I' ? 200 i ' f Blanket Water, Ingress - Egress Easement ( O.R. 5387 - P 969 I fl 4 i . 10' Dr do Util Ease O.R. 4074 - P 1451 _ .- _ - .,,_. __,. _. - - - _ __.. _ Novo 9/18/96 Item N: • Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: SUBJECT: Special Event Co-Sponsorship RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Confirm co-sponsorship and waiver of City fees for special events including Jazz Holiday, Fun 'n Sun, Fourth of July, Family Holiday Traditions and Parade, Turkey Trot, North Greenwood Street Festival, Martin Luther King Parade, and three new events, Saturdays in the City, Memorial Day, and Clearwater Pass Bridge Run at an estimated cost of $134,222 ($49,720 representing cash contributions and $84,502 representing in-kind contributions), and authorize event sponsors to approve vendors. 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: • City Commission policy regarding special events states: "All fees and related charges will be waived for City-sponsored or co-sponsored events; i.e., Fun 'n Sun, Jazz Holiday, July Fourth, Turkey Trot and Martin Luther King Parade. There shall be an annual review of City-sponsored/co-sponsored events during the budget process. An agenda item confirming co-sponsorship and waiver of fees for those events approved in the budget will be brought for City Commission approval at the beginning of each fiscal year. In the event additional money is requested beyond what is included in the approved budget, City Commission approval will be needed before said additional funds are dispersed." • This agenda item is provided in response to the above policy. Should additional money be requested beyond the "cash" contributions approved in the budget, City Commission approval will be requested. However, "in-kind" contributions are estimates and specific costs are not known until after the events are conducted. • The attached chart shows cash and in-kind contributions that were provided to last year's co- sponsored special events as well as contributions budgeted and/or requested for 1996197. • The total cash contribution of $49,720 is included in the City's operating budget for 1996/97 under "non-departmental expenses". • "In-kind contributions" are included in operating budgets under various departments. naviawed by: Originating Qepertmont: Coate: Commission Action: Legal 813G`222 . 13 Approved Budget Total ? ? Approved with Conditions Purchasing ??:?>'r.! ? .:"•?::':f>:: User Department: ? ... : ::. 13 peeled Risk Mg .rr NIA;. <;, ear[sst dr kA. Current Fiscal Year E3 Continued to: Is ACM Other Submitted by: CI ana or bete:>??:` ?. ® Not Required Affected Parties ? Notified . ? Not Required Funding 8aurcat ? capital Improvement: ® Operating. ? other: ,'Appropri•tion Code .. 010-.1-'07 WO.'54101'040,7201i apsrtmentsi 86dgels ($841'$021.. Attschments:. v• T.. Chartof Events ? None ) Printed on recycled paper Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum October 3, 1996 Page 2 2-5 • Three additional events that staff feels contribute to City goals of tourism and/or economic development are shown on the chart and are recommended for co-sponsorship in 1996/97. These include: * "Saturdays in the City" consists of periodic concerts and weekly Farmers Markets at Station Square Park. These activities will be held on Saturdays beginning October 12, 1996 and will run through May of 1997. • "Memorial Day" is held on the Bayfront consisting of concerts and a vintage car show. This event has been sponsored by the Parks and Recreation Department and Clearwater Festivals in previous years. However, it has grown to where staff feels it should be recognized and added to the list of "City-wide" co-sponsored events. • The Clearwater Pass Bridge Run was held last year as a part of the dedication ceremonies of the new bridge. It was sponsored by the Parks and Recreation Department, the Breakfast Sertoma Club and Clearwater Festivals. Because of its success and since it is the only run conducted entirely on the beach, staff recommends City-wide co-sponsorship along with the Breakfast Sertoma Club and the Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce. W SC y? y ?T H F ? ?" i3 ? S? Q w " ° r • U ? . ? p 4 , Q ? Qy ? g ° (?^p" e i ? " j p??} G ? C l P6 Cc G ti' 6: u ts F5 ..? V u •?? H 1 N c rs v .d:= 8.8 u 12 71 :3 cap h eedC '? '.3 ca c? 3 3 in , u y O N v1 0 p _ 0 S g g tnc- et n t z ao 'n ri ° is c= ao r-: ? , r cn - r o o. + r_ cir ci va + R 00 404 .. ;? ? 4 V'1 G1 " • U y 7: : M '-?.... • ? Q cc cl+ q ? 0 00 ? 00 1 Ln vn'Y 00 N Q ?' dl's: i y H ' H i? ' V! f'?/} G9 iNrj V4 OQ -7- '' O ? ?s S Q S g n :v i G 61 w u. ?+: F z° w Z d: ccu u m E° G ? d o ? 2. .D O 2 Q. ? V cn E -? E C.1 un W ? U ro ° o i U U? C7 a a 8 O u G C L E A R W A T E R ?H O L I D A Y September 23, 1996 35 b. Ms. Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4746 Clearwater,- FL 34618 Re: Clearwater Jazz Holiday Dear Betty: 4 The Foundation Board and JazzForce are most appreciative of the past support the City of Clearwater has provided to Clearwater Jazz Holiday. 1 am pleased to report that this year's event is well underway and promises to attract even more visitors to our lovely City. we are once again requesting the City's financial support in the amount of $25,000 which is the same amount which was provided last year. These funds are used along with the corporate sponsorship dollars to support the event because as you know, it is an all volunteer effort. Your consideration of our request would be much appreciated. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at #461-5777 ext 207. Sincerely, Deborah Vincent :hair DV Clearwater Jazz Holiday Foundation, Inc. P.O. Box 7278 c3Clearwater, FL 34618-7278 Presented and Organized by the Greater Clearwater ChamUer of Commerce 1979.1999 Item #36 AOO ? M CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum Itcin 4 Meeting Dale 10.3 q ? SUBJECT: Clearwater Airpark -Fixed Base Operator Final Ranking of Candidates RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the ranking of prospective Fixed Base Operators to furnish aviation services at Clearwater Airpark, N and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute sync. SUMMARY: On April 22, 1996 the City of Clearwater solicited proposals (RFP) for a five (5) year lease agreement for a Fixed Base Operator (FBO) to provide aviation services at its Clearwater Airpark, A total of four (4) bid proposals were received and on June 28, 1996 the proposals were opened in the office of the Purchasing Manager. • A selection committee was formed comprised of the following staff members: Richard Baier, City Engineer Margaret Simmons, Finance Director Dan Katsiyannis, Internal Audit Director Bob Brumback, Director of Solid Waste Glen Bahnick, Civil Engineer R (Engineering Staff Liaison for Airport Authority) • On July 18, 1996 the selection committee determined that all candidates met the minimum qualifications of the RFP. • On August 6, 1996, the candidates made their presentations to the selection committee. Each candidate was evaluated according to the following criteria as enumerated in the RFP: Experience, fullness of resources, economic return to the City and safety. • On August 12, 1996 the selection committee finalized the rankings of the candidates. The final ranking in descending order is listed as follows: 1) Clearwater Aircraft., Inc. 2) Clearwater Flying Corporation 3) D/B/A Armament Systems Company 4) Homecare Industries • It is recommended that the Commission approve the Selection Committee's ranking and authorize negotiations for contractual services in order of ranking. (See attached ranking matrix) continued: Rsv(eWed by: originating Dept. Costs: Commission Action Legal NIA Engineering Serv{cas (Current FYI Approved Budget NiA User Dept. ? FundkV Source: Approved wlconditions Purchasing U LA )r»ginsering Services Capt. Imp. Denied Risk Mpmt. N A Advertised: Operating Cont'd to Is N/A, Data: Other ACM Paper, ENa. Not required: NIA OTHER Affected parties Appropriation Code(s) Attachments; notified Subn9tted By: Ranking Matrix ? City Manager [s/ Not Required _ NLA - FBO ankktg.AON 3? Page 2 continued: Agenda Item - Clearwater Airpark - FBO Final Ranking of Candidates • A FBO Lease Agreement will be presented to the Commission upon completion of negotiations. The Lease Agreement will include standard provisions for: Term of Agreement; Area of Lease and area(s) for aviation operations; } Maintenance and Repair of Grounds (Maintenance responsibilities for Lessor and Lessee); Airpark Operational Standards (Kinds of Aviation Operations which are required or allowed to operate, staff requirements, hours of operation, safety standards, etc.); Payments (City Income); Provision of Utilities (Utility payments by Lessee); Property Tax (Payments. by Lessee); Insurance; Indemnification; Disclaimer of Warranties; Lessee to act as an Independent Contractor, Future Property Improvements; Sublease Requirements and Forms; Lease Assignment; Nondiscrimination; Default and Termination; and Miscellaneous Provisions. The Clearwater Airport Authority Board is also in the process of reviewing and making recommendations for appropriate lease provisions. f J d QODD OOD ti O rr+ LL -r a ti O .? O ?e- N V U a ' N Q' N r +? ,? ..r e- r s- r- O LL N Ow - ?W? - .... J N w u? N N fcbN E J Ul u a . w z W %W. (f} N [N a z ..? w V J U. O W V Wa U 0 Q V W..Q = a... ?... ...?S 34? I t .I T M v ? 8 V r} C? I? m {•I r' KK q Ti.. ? 1(?J T r r In vi w i0 ?Q F T • A , e A A Sri r N ? CO f 1 1 / V m r 1 P C 3 i ? Cf ? r f Y ? Y ? ' ? ? g 0 ? WN N c ? ? I ? ?pp r t tpp tV T w V V?? f u s u s ' { r V f•? 7 {O w J f p? r (V ? r IY ? v I , . is I 'd SB59 z9S CIO 3X&NIA M-0 HMIJ Y7p t t t 9m1-1. 1•-6 m City 0 Clearwater Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk FROM: Richard Baier, City Engineer COPIES: Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager SUBJECT: Airpark FBO Information DATE: October 1, 1996 RECEIVED OCT0119% !3ITY (IL.Er-% Lll,.??pT. Listed below is the information you requested on investments the current Fixed Base Operator (FBO) has made in the Clearwater Airpark in the last 15 years. 12 years ago the FBO spent $10,000 to remodel the flight operations building. • The FBO spent $50,000 on airplane maintenance equipment. • The FBO spent $300,000 on aircraft for flying school. • Plumbing and HVAC repairs over the years amounted to approximately $3,000. Please note, three years ago Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. had an IRS audit. RJBIns r. , -Aug-19-96 03:59P past-ir Pax Note 7871 OMB ? '- 7o From • E Co Co. ftm 1 Phom ¦at 2a ax N I I P.01 M K ``e .- 3C=? City of Clearwater Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager FROM: Richard Baia, City Engineer COPIES: Clearwater Airport Authority RFP Selection Committee Terry knnings, Chief Engineer Glen Bahnick, Civil Engineer 11 SUBJECT: R'FP - Clearwater Airpark fixed Base Operator DATE: August 16, 1996 COPIES TO: COMMISSION AUG 2 01996 AFteSS CLERK / AT'TORNE=Y As you are aware, a selection committee was formed to evaluate the RFP submittals for the Fixtd Base Operator (FBO) at Clearwater Airpark. The election committee is comprised of the following stafrmembers: + Richard Baier, City Engineer • Margaret Simmons, Finance Director + Dan Katsiyann* Internal Audit Director s Bob Brumback, Director of Solid Waste + Glen Bahnick. Civil Engineer 11 (Engineering Staff Ualson for Airport Authority) The selection committee has determined the fallowing relative to the subject matter. + At a meeting on July 18. 1996, the selection committee determined that all candidtates met the minimum qualifiC960P3 of the RFP. • At the vendor presentation meeting on August 6, 1996, the candidates were ranked' acc6r&s to the following criteria as enumerated in the RFP: Experience, fullnents of resourc4m economic return to the City and safety. e The selection committee weighted the criteria as follows: Experience ............................. 50 points Fullness of resources .................. 25 points Economic return to the City .......... IS points Safoty ....................................10 01012 100 points possible c o*\)-er- Aug-19-96 03:69P Page 2 continued- Memo -RFP - Clearwater Airpark Fixed Base Oparmor August 16, 1996 • The following is the final ranking of the candidates as determined by the selection committee and listed in d"onding order: (ace attached matrix) 1) Clearwater AircaA Inc. 1000 North Hercules Avenue Cla watery Florida 34625 Represented by Clarence (Rick) Emshoff - Total Snore 83 2) Clearwater Flying Corporation 2389 Republic Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Represented by Dr. Jannelli - Total Snore 84 3) DIWA Armanwa Systems Company 1901 Douglas Avenue Clearwater, Florichi 34615 Represented by Ka uAh L. Love - Total Score 77 P.02 4) Homecare Induddca 2386 Parkstream Avenue Clearwater, Florida 34619 Represented by John Rich - Total Score 69 It is the selft-don cosnmitte e!a intention to recommend to the Management Team that Clearwater Aircraft be granted a five (5) year law agreement to operate as the Fixed Base Operator at Clearwater Airpark, . i • An agenda memo is boring prep" for the September 5, 1996 City Commission meWns rardCing the FBO candidates. An additional agenda memo will follow for the September 19, 1996 mceaing recommending a five year lease ngreemmt with it Clearwater Aircraft, Inc, Attachment +de t 2 i t o 1'. Aug-39-96 04:OOP s ti 71, V- Z U N r+ ? c? r uA r W • W O d i 4 N N J W tL W g Z 0 W g ?,--,P- = 3 C P.03 c FLO t ?Y Interoffice Correspondence Sheet To: Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager From: Dan C. Katsiyiannis, Internal Audit Director CEIVED CC: Betty M. Deptula, City Manager COMMISSION OPI S Tpf; 18 1996 Richard Baler, City Engineer Date: August 23, 1996 AUG 2 1996 ?? ?F':,'.uR PhtbS RE: Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. CLERK / ATTORNEY We have reviewed the lease agreement between the City and Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. (the current FBO of the Clearwater Airpark). The Lessee Is up to date in their fixed monthly lease payments of $4,050 to the City. In addition, the lessee Is to pay $.03 cents per gallon of fuel dispensed at the Airpark. We have reviewed Clearwater Aircraft, Inc's fuel dispensing logs for 1995 and 1996 and compared this information to the amounts remitted to the City. We found no errors in the remittances made to the City for fuel sales. However, we did discover that several months of remittances on fuel sales, due to a bookkeeping oversight, were not made to the City: March 95 for $280.50; & December 95 for $269.26. The president of the company did cut a check Immediately payable to the City for the $269.26. Because some additional research was required by the lessee for the month of March 95, the $280.60 will be remitted by the lessee sometime next week. The lessee's compliance with the Insurance requirements of the lease has been reviewed by Mr. Glen Sahnick, Engineer 11 and Mr. Leo Schrader, the Risk Manager. In addition, any other Issues associated with the lease have been reviewed by Mr, Glen Bahnick. Pursuant to the lease agreement (page 8, paragraph 10), the Lessee is required to provide credible information to demonstrate to the City that they have the technical and financial ability to perform the lease. Clearwater Aircraft Inc. is organized as a Subchapter S Corporation with Mr. Clarence Emshoff as the sole shareholder. Although the financial information we examined was not audited or reviewed by an Independent Certified Public Accounting firm, nothing came to our attention that would indicate that the corporation was currently insolvent (not capable of paying their current debts) or that the business would not be a continuing business enterprise in the future. DKIdk The rental shall ;r-jt paid. onthly in advance, the first pay to be made on the first day of a 17-1 , 3997., and a 'like pt"cnt shall be clue and payable on the day p each month thereafter during the ' term-of this Agreement. The Lessee shall also pay the Lessor three (3) cents per gallon for-fuel dispensed at the Airpark. C. DellOqueney Charge - A rental payment shall be delinquent if not paid on or before the 10th day of the month in which payment is due, and shall accrue interest of the rate of twelve (12) percent per annum until paid. 0. Place of Payment ? All payments due City from Lessee shall be delivered to the finance Department, City of Clearwater, P.0, Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 34638-4748. Taxes and Assessments - Lessee Shall pay all taxes and assessments against property leased, to Lessee by this Agreement, and against the'leasehold and any other property interests under this Agreement. ccounting principles and keep for a period of five (S) years and for such - ('rtloquestod F. Lessee will maintain in accordance with generally . accepted • dditional reasonable period as the City may, in writing, request, records end ooks of account and such other records as the City'osy reasonably request, ecording all transactions for the conduct of the business provided for erein, all of which records and books of account shall-be made available at he Clearwater Airpark, or in such other location as na?y be approved or in writing by the City. per. C) - 14 - 09/17/96 10:03 TX/RX H0.2676 P.001 VU R V K '36 811,442 3537 OR Q.JANNELL.! 56F' . Z 7.56 S e l l AM ?' .002 G. The acceptance by City of any statement by Lessee, or' of any payment, shall n9t 6e deemed a waiver of the right of City to claim additional payment after a review and inspection of Lessee's books and records nor sh*11 such acceptance constitute a waiver by Lessee of any claim for a refund from City for any overpayment: H. Lessee sill use cash and credit control devices of a type acceptable to City and that accurately reflect the gross revenues of Lessee from all sales. 1. Lessea shall, during the terse of this Agreement, and for one (I) year thereafter, permit, upon reasonable notice to Lessee, inspections and audit by City-of all rds and_Uok-s o including such records eCT ' - - as ty to ba maintained by Lessee and u red by thh informat tray Re re ion required to be maintained pursuant to any provision of this Agreement.. It is further understood and agreed that' any such inspection and audit shall be conducted during the business hours of Lessee: and that Lessee shall make the aforesaid records,, books of account and other documentation available at a location designated in writing by the City, J. Abatement of Rent and Lease Extension - In the event the provisions of Article XIV, A.4 became applicable, Lessee's rent shall abate in proportion- aCCording to the number of days of the month in which the disruption occurs. In such an event, Lessee shall have the option to terminate the Lease or keep the Lease in force. In the latter case, the Lease small be extended for such time as the Airpark is closed to Civilten air traffic. ARTICLE VI UTILITIES Lessee agrees to posy the cost of all utilities for the facilities leased. In tpo event Lessee fails to pay any utility bills when due, City may, at its option, pay the some and collect from LeSSele the amounts so disbursed, plus interest at the rate of twelve percent 112) per anrtum until paid, and in such event, this Agreement is subject for cancellation at the option of the City. ARTICLE VII INSURANCE Lessat shall procure and maintain during the term of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which say arise from or in.connection with this lease. The cost of such insurance shall be borne by the Lessee. -is w '09/17/96 10:03 TX/RX NO.2676 P.002 10/03/1996 08, 41 913446894 3 BEACH PLACE MOTEL. PAGE 01 301 south gulfview boulevard Mayor and Commissioners City of Clearwater City Hall Fax 462-6486 October 3, 1996 clearwater beach, florida 34636 phone (813) 442-6714 Dear Mayor and Commissioners, e: C s t r it mmi n e n item 36. lenrwat r Alr rkc Le ale I understand that at this Thursdays commission meeting you will be considering proposals for the operation of Clearwater Airpark. Having read Mr. Dave Gasparinrs letter in last Sundays edition of the St, Petersburg Times I felt that I should write to you expressing my opinion. I am a pilot and have used Clearwater Airpark as my base for several years, I am also a motel owner on Clearwater Beach and know first hand about the very many people, mainly from overseas, that come'to Clearwater to fly. They use our motels, cat in our restaurants and shop in our shops. The cost of Flying in the LISA is approximately I/3 of that in Europe. Pilots from all over Europe come to Clearwater either to receive flying tuition, build time or just enjoy the beautiful scenery of our area. Suncoast Flying Services advertise their services in many of the overseas flying publications and I know for a fact that in UK they have gone to the expense of appointing a local agent to cater for the numerous inquiries that they have generated. There are minor problems at the Airpark but these, have in the main, be generated by the uncertainty of the lease. No business man will invest money for improvements unless he has a secure lease. Operating with uncertainty on a month to month basis is not an environment that encourages capital improvements or builds staff moral. Suncoast Flying Services have 12 aircraft in their lease fleet and will expand further if they are successfUl In being granted the sublease for the aircraft maintenance and flight school. The Airpark can and should be developed into a tourist attraction. Suncoast Flying Services already offer scenic discovery flights along our beaches and many of my motel guests have been 10/03/1996 08:,41 8134468944 BEACH PLACE MOTEL. PAGE 02 overjoyed with their first experience in a small plane. I know that Charles Wilber is planning to expand the discovery flights into a tourist attraction. I am therefore vary concerned when I hear that the other bidder for the Airpark proposes to have only 5 airplanes, this would he a major step backwards. Local pilots that rent will be forced to go to St. Petersburg or Albert Whitted, and, so will the tourists. Suncoast Flying Services has developed an excellent international reputation which is confirmed by the many overseas pilots that return to Clearwater on a regular basis, It would be a pity if they were forced to movd to St, Petersburg. ?r 3 ?EF.1c.14C17 1C?????''+ /,'.IeA? c t . 55 r-.1/11 L Bob Gibson 3 ?r 2104 Timber Lane Clearwater, FL 34623.1443 013) 733.2876 FAX- (M) 80-3100 TO: All City CoMmisslonem - Clearwater City Hall FAX Humber. 462.6720 Bub eat: Airport FSO 0 aratlons COMMISSION DATE: September 19, 1990 SEP 19 1996 FROM: Bob Gibson Atz? Plitzss CLERK IATTORNEFY TOTAL PAGES (Including Cover): 1 I am a pilot and aircraft owner. I have been a customer of Clearwater Airpark since 1990 and have based my aircraft there continuously. It has coma to my attantion that someone as launched an Initiative to remove Rick Brnsho#f as the Fixed Based Operator (FBO) of Clearwater AirparK I also undvratand that there to a meeting at City Nall today at 6 PM to debate the relative merits of this subJect. Although I will make every effort to attend this moating, I would like this FAX to represent my view that, from a custome?s perspective, Mr. Smshoff s conduct as FBD has been acceptable and there Is no compelling rseson to change F80 maponalbility at this tune. look forward to joining you for this meeting. I will be very interested In hearing opposing views. ' r ) c R ! t ? 0 • 02/02/1994 02;02 7865227 September 19, 19% • Dear Mayor and City C6mmissioners, PE 'M kPA EM INC COPSES TO COMMISSION SEP 191995 PVAESS GLERK .. A,TORN6ti. PAGE 01 After reading the article in the St. R2Wrsburg Tmas this morning concerning the operation of the Clearwater Airpark, I would like to offer you my comments for your consideration. I am a pilot and fly from Clearwater Airpark and Mr. Emshoff has always treated my aviation naeds in a professional approach. His stability as manager at the Airpark should not be questioned. As a resident of Clearwater, a user of the Airpark, end a local businessman I would recommend that Mr. Emshoff be given a longer lease so that he could invest in the Airpark instead of not knowing on a month to month basis of where he stands. What business can make long term plans without a long term tease? It Is my understanding that the competing companies have no professional experience in an operation of this type and i certainly would recommend the approval of a known entity (Rick Emahofo versus an unknown. I also cannot understand how the rating system can compare safety records. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Peter C. Krauser 2989 Elysium Way ? Clearwater, Florida 34619 M Sky zk1n rrehc1nc, V 81 3-791 -9693 AM19.'96 01:69 PM 0111 SKYWATCH TRAFFIC INC. FAX 813-791-9693 SEP 15 1996 PO Box 6964 - Clearwater • FI • USA • 34625 Date: To: Pages tnsiusit thIa: -1- Mayor and Q11y Commissan Recipient Fax: 462-6720- From: Dennis Raw- Sender Fax : 813-791-9693- Dear Mayor Garvey and City Commissioners: I am distressed that Clearwater Airpark is again a political Issue. As a past member and Vice Chair of the Airport Authority, I worked closely with Rick Emshoff for three years. There is no doubt he is the best qualified Individual to manage the Airpark. Although I feel the tenants (through the Airpark Authority) should have been more Involved In the selection process , city staff made the right choice. There are those who would like to turn the small airport into a 'flying yacht club' and still others that want to see it'run more like a military camp. Clearwater Airpark Is simply a small community airport.1 Our resident flyers are nurses, firemen, teachers, business leaders and retirees, Many of these tenants can scarcely afford flying, but are able to hold on to their passion because the Airpark is there. Rick Emshoff has had much to do with seeing that it Is run properly without the intrusiveness usually associated with government property. I ask that you a1get behind Mr. Emshoff and give him the help he needs to continue improving this vital public asset. The City is far behind on most Improvements to the facility approved in the master plan. The needed Improvements, not a change In management will assure that the Airpark continues to support itself and those who make their livelihood from it. Thank you for your time, t"'r?wr.. Gw\r_ t?",o+v_ Cw?r tt~AVr tCAV_ L/?v..It';"Arv_ tC'A.v 8 L 35307787 P.02 ABLE o#41MGffw"4C:ON -J -1 = 14M-ABLZ JXT (400-M-353 24 Hour Wodd.Wde Service ncr ?:-F\/FL-) SEP-19-96 THU 12t57 PM ABLE.JCTS. Suptumber 19p 1996 VIA FACSIMILE Thor Honorable Rita Garvey and City Commi%%ionars City of Clearwater Dear Mayor Garvey and Commissioners, ,?U- 1',,1996 I read an article in this mornings St. Pete Times that La vary disturbing to mss and feel strongly compelled to offer my opinion. The article I reference in relating to the Clearwater Airpark letames. Please noto that I of for my opinions an a third party observer with absolutely no personnel:or financial gain involved relating to this decision. I have known Mr. Emohoff for over twelve yearn and, in fact, was the Manager of one of his largest clients when he ran the Tampa facility. The company I, was with at that period in 1993 was American Jets Internati.onal# Inc and, as Mr. Emuhoff stated, we moved our operation from his facility In Tampa to then St. Preto/Clearwater Airport in 1993. The decision to move our opurationes had nothing to do with the way Mr. Emsshoff ran his facility, in fact we were alw&Vv. pleased with the service from Ouncoasat, howaver, due to numerous financial advantagissf at St. Pete/Clearwater wa opted to move. The articles quotes Commissioner, goal stating "the bankruptcy concerns her" and "don't you think it -makes you a little wary of someone's operational and financial stability". I would like to ask Commissioner Still how many times in the past three years Mr. Emshoff has misused a paymant to thw City. I have no personnel knowledge of the answer to this question howeever, knowing Mr. Emsshof, f , I'd be willing to bet it's zeros. Furthermore, Commissioner Clark stated that he was bothered that the rating system placed experience an far ahoad of safety and my response to that is experience is safety. When you have the ramperience you know how to he sesfe3. In closing I can only say, without hesitation, that 'displaCing Mr. Enshoff from running this Airpark would be a gravy injustice to the citizens of,Cle arwateyr as his sexperfwnces, knowledgm and expertise in -Aviation is-unparalleled. Vary truly yoUrss, Steven Bailey Ganeral Manager FORT MOtCE INMAMONAL AIAF= 3100 AIRNWO ONE . P. 0. box 3609 . FOB eh[RCL. M 3494154W . FN( 561.446-M ST. n rEP3$U tCitQtARWAT9A 1hnXMMM NRPOO 15707 FAI"LO ONYE t6 . F. O. BOX 5490 • QLAINATtk FL 34618.349o . FAX 813.s3G.7787 ,3 5. ; 9. 35 ; 1 : 34rm I- izxnI' 9 C a r :1 a 6C4 t 3 t aT PG 1 COPIES TO. COMMISSION .. . SEPr..-1 9 1996 ?'_. _--___•----,.r-- ,, .,,.??i .. Masan •C. Coax, PIW. , CLERK r'ATTORNEY ' Research & Development 'reehnical'Adviaor tl ??6? ?, GY s O)Ci?A Cllr A) 0- Voy' 4q Y? ?44 It.. le. eof • W I . Y? •? X77 ? /1 ?I ? , r / . '_1 • . ALI r?.ar-• ?v•, ?? 777 T; . • .. ,.. ' :: _, r 0op fw-rAt 'w 44,tf • 1 ,' . 'r 'w r i goo LO-OF r 19 11079, Trudewind; Boulevard + largo, Florldit 34643' ttadi.ulon Ph iu'• 91319?•?17a .' ? ? 'Florids L?ed?orctiYe M?kr14L," i; D EEP-19 a6 13:42 FVZW:C1T1ZB Z BRX September 19, 1996 44M7 M CITLZENS BTrust M:AC?67c0 COPIES TO: The Honorable Mayor Rita Garvey COMMISSION PAGE * 02 Mayor of Clearwater i SEP 191995 City Commisziortes Bab C uk City Commissioner Karen'Scel PRESS City Commissioner 'Ed Hooper CLERK /ATTORNEY City Commissioner 1. B. Johnson 117 S. Osceola Ave, Clearwater, FL 34616 Dear Mayor Garvey and city Commisaionen; 3 am writing to you at thil request of C1»cncc'`(R3ck) Emsholt, owmr of Clearwater Aircraft, Im. Mr. Emshoff asked Imo, as his banker, to inform you of his banking relationship with Citizens Bank do Truss. Rick has-been a customer of tba bank since July, 1993. The tic has gmted 10W, both to Rick pe.m ully, and his ccqmmdan. Since inception, &a bat>ttg ucounts and loans have been handled professionaUy and sati,dut ily. 1 have pcnonnAy known Rick for approximately six years and have much reapoet for his knowledgo W abilldd In his imhu y. I know that you will eowLa many imaw when deciding upon the Airpark operations. T can, at least, attest. to the professional manw in which W. Emshoff has handled his banking relationship with CitizenslBank & Trust Should.you require arty addidorAl information please contact the at 447-8042. SA=* Cif {?[. Senior Vi Senior Locsn GS(3:caw cc: Mr. Clttmnce Emshoff 1111 cu""" Skew CkW"UA n"i" 3"L5 (tv) 4t1-W7 • Fax (013) 413<M ws.M Rai.c. O A7/A7/l g94 A7: 94 7AR5777 September 19, 1996 PF I F'F? KRa FFR TNr PACE Al COPIES TO. COMMISSION SEP 19 1996 Pates CLERK 1 AT70RNEY To: City of Ciemvater Mayor and Commissioners { Re: Airport Lease E I am a rofdent ofthe atv nff'.lewmmor w id a rn„9m,'4 r t:Sft ? rri: iiwbr Ay ?W i V?L?111i like tvuk for your support in awarding the lease to Rick Emsha? the current operator who has run the airport efficiently and safely fnr the last 1,5 years. Prior to his operating the airport there suss constant turmoil and safety problems, this is M the case now. i am personally familiar with Mr. Emshoff s financial condition (}kc is my father-in-law) and I can tell you this is absolutely not a I wv? . a 1,'p m ;ews4 s iur -.6 . L realer, tiuit Lummias'soner Sears class friend and political supporter. Jahn Ricb4 is one of they Appiisants for the kese but this should not be a political issue. pleaac sup?ort your staff arid award the lease to Mr. $rashoff SitWMgy, Mark W. Maconi r CORPORATE C"K E ..... i?.S.l.. .??.V,.w.l. 17 1MR V, VS If,r•....? FL34634 se s?oat w:; k1t at MOYS 227 v W%NK W. MACQN1 INC. SEP-- 1 9-96 THU 1 2 ; 29 PM FLORIDA LA14DSCAPC ASSOC 913 9260229 r f /J ? CMM ??Ciyc .rG?c? September 19, 1996 i co PIES to. i COMMISSION SEP 19 1996 City of Clearwater Clearwater, Florida CLERK ?h?aa Attn: Mayor & Commissioner: This letter is in response to he article written in the St. Petersburg Times today, regarding the C16annter Airpark. I have known Rick Emshoff for the past three yew and park my airplane at the airpark. Pick has been very helpful in many ways and I strongly recommend he continue to operate the airpark. It appears everyone to so concerned about his personal endeavors instead oflooking at his tenure and wgxxionoe there. If it's not broke, don't fix it, 'T'herefore, In conclusion, T vote fbr Mr. Emshof£to stay at the airpark and continue doing what he does best. Thank you, John Van Vulpen, President Sent via facsimile to (813) 4f2-6720 14920 Race Track Rd. Yampa, FL 93826 (819) 920-66i 6 !l=ax (M) M-02U 0 0 q P.01 SEP 19 196 13t2e BARTELT ' BATELT AVIATION, INC. ..j . O,• - C?s 1 f } ' : Septem 19, 1996 Ttti' City of Clearwa Dear C? r i 'I ° ' `• Today, I. 1 .. ; . , &park 6 15 yew. My aomt - ?? Aviation !' l { udess it Over &e totaled o 1 • '' ' of his we ! ., 1.- 1 Rick Ent ?,::! t:: :• Hiss a man 1 , ' if you h 1 •? 1 !' ` a john 0.1 • ?? ? •?laeu . COPIES TO: COMMISSION SEP 19 1996 PHtbs CLEPKp ATTORNEY tee P31/02 PHONE: 616451-543i FAX: 8te$014". 1 D Florida Commissioners; Avo takon the time to write this latter of recommendation in favor of Rick Erashof of Clurwater Aircrlak Inc. Clearwater Aircraft should be recommended to run the r the City of Cite eater. You have a 9oiid operator who has proven himself for last I any has been in business since 1976 and at*enc a is the key to survival is the Community. It is also my experience that an FBO wM not survive 80% of the time d supported by an, Akmft Sales D'n?ision which you would have with Rick Emshot lust 20 years. we have completed several transactions with Mr. Emshoft'that have sex $744;0000. Each transaction was completed as agreed. Mr. Emshoft'is a man rd which is an asset that few individuals possess, hoffhas'the knowledge and eagmdence to operate a successful Fixed Base Operation. any ha3 an excellent reputation through out the Aviation Community. Rick Emshoff W integrity who I trust. any questions or concerns, pkase feet five to contact me at my office any time. KIITSCH MUNICIPAL AIRPORT • 1101 WEST LAFAYEM + STUntS, MICHIGAN Al ' t 1 f ' a COPIES TO: COMMISSION Septcntbcr 1% 1976 SEP 191996 Vin Frtx 462-6720 PRESS CLERK I ATTORNEY. • To: Ma%•or Rita Garxty Clctnvatcr Cdttutiisxloners 8 chevron Aviation The Hiner Group, Inc Chev= U.S.A. Inc. Aviation Products 5321 Memorial Highway Tampa, Norfda 33634 813-882.3313 • FAX 813.88,2.4294 I t Derv Maw and Commissioners: 1 &-we read the attached article regarding Clearwater Ait4rttft and rp l compelled to respvnd on behalf of our customer. The Hiller Group. Inc, is a lcadfng nm(onut m iation Mel supplier, and the only Charon ovlatlon Met distributor in the Eastern United States. We arc the 60 nippikT to Clenrtvalcr Airparkmbich Is t Chevron branded heed base apentlion. In Otte selection process to cngage a neN airport dealer kt almider witral ractorn, trot tits Icast orWhiclt i5 tht cltiaraclcr and Integrity of %be management rmd au•racrahfp. ? The Chevran hatimark is our most calusblc asset and cmending ibe right of urge to a dealer is not a dccisinn we take tlghth. i At all times. I haw found hoc. Rick Etn€1xa io be without ruproach. He brings a substat CW level of Skill and avpcnisc to the Clednvatcr Airpnrk and amity bci c its your community. On a flnanelal level, ive aNtclxi Mt, EmAolra ctibsttmtlat line of cmdit to poircltiase Chmrm M. Your airport is a gtrtctti•ay to ttte Cleam2ter commutily imd 0canvttler Aircraft is a community asset you should walk to keep. Sinccrcl?. • I Martin H. Hiller ! %'I= President MI.11 I:11C ac: It. Emsholr, Clear?ialerAlrpark Z001? daouD HMIR 3n CT9C+Z99+CT9 RVA Lt:tT W11 01' 113 19 ?A 121 13 Oman e1vtroofor Ac Ides TO 8t24294 • PtoI _?,, ,w•. Mosmomon'...",';?` ,.. V da; ?? ,•. MOM* till u in: air: [tear COinmISS?OstPSS a? nOt isfied wftthe wmpeny.its staff recommended to run the aapak; en though in has been operating the alityfor 15 years: 6 .TIMRS ar rHUAWAY. SMEMSER .39. 1998 CT Tian W tbitl?Riea and o* S& I2 M la E1ca` bra dra FaWxt }aaKiid;. w4 odd lbl" l ?s siti?ad at tbt tap of the HsL be drappedlt b' ' i ix,Z?xao?E thy. p1,i it •rr,.,.• Tam v! ! ?Y. • • , • ,?; ?,? , , ata? ti . ?4r??•, frS?t Cieu•aate?c: ?At'l? itva tom- .. ?' ..?.' :.• ?^ . '. . , , '' 11bc, B?e,rl;zid F.maho?e 1xwt?a4'! 1 S C7%M4 Commbdwott3ae rL?1MnI1 ip *as whti?d Mai the ra*8 C L CL EMWATER --- Some ma* turbu'I`ewe w( • ._„na !>r.ys.??>?d' a? • "7u.`yr't }i??we samnaoer? hss surd saute, and it• aa,q.y.? cm YI?'? sh the dtya d ,•amt. mew go an fi start t [bezic ere ?t tao am 4?:: umvtK Y WM d panxi .". h¢ vakL At iscne is a? the dtj sboufd bite to M the bate + ad,".mac uotd "Om • `MW jot. MCM *01 !* tberb b utk !or tht ocxt fitrr yearn. *?aY? e,_ mes, ??a;re.p?d: ': nano p?p?e d de?ae6oo. ieatrto 3? suers Isz+rQ wed the Sau s5a ?i1 h t: , SM O!'? tEgd he . t Old tv ram tba iaa#itY. and tvaig2+ "• '>afia1? recite to rcao kic'!t Fats $ grit ` W four otber tky sdmbkbmzwj-ia iced he= 'he ti«dct bt the eky Clezromter Ah=aft EDc. who bj4 bcxa the the rating p:oar said the poaciahould hava eftef4e4 his ai rit utVA operttW for 15 T1 uL i ? ' mpedwCt 'sn bVxtmVP--kWC anotb r &re?? M " aae .r Bat some CRT C r 101 M 11 ? --s aro bothered. bmame R afd aaoaedb8 obo u tbe;-'?reteoa it "t wss his pew co - t wtother +compm rm.by Emshoif Med it. Wid **Xi6 lbdc tuoubc IKaa,r - W, Gkl74tt:r A4ar A wo a.cffitt4; &rtrgcy In a?vedCt?ttces in 198l. In'' ' oP'erata[' tans beta arrxt? ?'•; iatt ? stioa is Mash aims : toe a ix bay a ?'?? + e®c3a1s abets the bttlkcuptcy decided aoR to ' . s?eboa?d and Lbq ,tsaoai'ttb to; ?r?3a?t ..?$?. a?.wR"y?o aa,e •I • .. L+y1u? M1 " w%TA • 4 .T }• • . ? ?' ¦q••? 1tTr h}! cdrtrld. RA ssaid d* ?0 ?iQl w MxS- t to thm ? the s1e be4afZ to proacas redo s+i ptcy cotes tat' r? ia*4- at &wboWs t' m? ads X000 u uxxdh .lead in Raid ?..•? Vz . johml TM 9LM It makes You M latle . ? 1Doi<a and ' ry cd af> Bane's o f aid ftuW *a- sub add tba do t? ?clir?to slstt ?.m??'?? t?rY' aslcsad. ' m "Surmpdof A'rkdw s.; mouth btu. Seel VA Other )ne" sho W t i>etdih dom. ' He said ate wwcoly, t1 frees bare not kept a done emush m od` ' k>aae at' lira ? ad' sfsb , ' of did tamed ooe 'r dats. is oh= s fittzracial Pedcanwxt at the t trit,'; o p=wd son aristian bta?aaaa ?bt,r1 '?ecr' cs " frmadaQtr .azad i vM d t3cy ire upxt With the 1;ad of aTste= tbai .. ? ti7lg9106 St tbo tlop of the tilt, That "Ttem put it pa;vadum ao rMMtenez+ -e in the industry, -WhiCh. $eel contends, ighted it ullixl IY b4 EmshcWm iarOr. 'Y'ha :tesaaP7WW MXEMM of ?a ?11trn oa a CM the M OyCra s 94ejicm, 13 I3, ; . . WS oat the eocrenPIC ret=n earth propoW W befog to t?aa:l+llr Ur, mad, 10 poia era ety. zMahaf aosne4 tort of the faer anmpbtisY;} tise Ta rctum and lmmt on Wiatsts for eaq?crieaae Put him nrer?tha top, t ttmx poke attqnd of a mum c&Ded CkwMr,ra- - m/ eat Flyk8 Corp s• . o none Peer AMPAIRK Past Q t opiaos>aest ccaattotmom kd todw`e cE solbc dkotZ, AztsndmY iosseau much: as 5164.004 bepa to pile vp. Aud a199C'i2x =CP=y 3 ilad lb= a-to t lt b7 ad toked It was ott-l" fPzM tbA I mated ,000, I3t Id IM TOTAL Y-ut coo n dnom H3111H NHL CTCC+999+CT9 lY,•i W VT MM 9616T160 Sop-•19-96 01:60P WILDER CORP 813 791 1798, P.01 VIA,- FACSIMILE (813) 4§2-6720 September 19, 1996 Rita Garvey, Mayor ! City Commissioners & City Staffers city of Clearwater Dear Ms. Garvey, City Commissioners & City Stuly4rs: lbs fetter is In response to the newspaper article in today's Clearwater Times. Our company is a local Clearwater firm that is actively engaged in the area of aircraft use and sales. ; Over the past 15 years we have had numerous business dealings with Mr. F.msholf, both on a company and personal basis. We have always found Mr. Lmshoff to he honest, sincere and reputable in our business dealings and on many occasions, doing more than what was required to ensure that we were satisfied, Mr. Emshofl formerly iiperatcd as Suneoast• Aviation and more recently, as Clearwater Aircraft, Inc, On one previous busine:cs hansection, Suneoast Aviation, Inc. owed our company hundre6 of thousands of dollars, and the debt was paid in full, on time, with a very satisfactory pay schedule. I have had the pleasure of personally being acquainted with Mr. Lmshufl' for over IS years. I have found him to be dependable and very trustworthy. He does what he says he will do. On behalf of our comp)y and myself, 1 believe the City has made the right decNion in allowing Mr. Emshoff to run the airpark. His ability to satisfy the requirements of his lease obligations have been proven for 15 years. I have to assume that past pedormance would put him at the top of any list of prospective airport operators. Sincerely, I r?• ? Thotna.R L. Merrell ' General Manager/Asst, Secretary TL11+Ileh ZY9 0 DYSIM 913e$42B12 4?-4 The Dynamic Simulation Group September 19, 1996 P. el COPIES ro. COMMISSIOM Clearwater City ConuniWolncrs SEP 9 1996 Clearwater Florida pht6s CLERK/ ATTORNEY TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: A?irpark Management Issue After reading an article in today's SL Peterxburg Times regarding selection of whom the city should hire to run its i'lirpark, I felt compelled to write you to express my support of Mr. Rick Emshoff, I am a retired FAA, air traffic controller from Tampa International Airport with over 30 years aviation expcricnce. I have personally and profemionally known Mr. E hofF for the better part of 15 years. During that time I have never known him to be less than straight forward and extremely professional in his numSemment and business dealings. An experienced, honest professional with the capability to tun your airpark is a hard coarrmodity to Brad. When you have an individual such as W. Eumboff runWnRg your operation, the downside to replacing him far ex6ecds any potential upside you might gain. )Do yourselves and your constitueou s favor by allowing Mr. Emshoff to continue to tun the M rpark. J Sincerely, Robot F. Curtis Vice President a P.O. Box 260175 • Tampa, FL` • 33665 (813) 854-2812 - 855.3540 - fax 854-2960 COASTAL/FLAGSHIP YACHT TEL too .8135437900 Sep 19,96 14:26 No.004 P.01 ALR,LRT Go SEIZ',F ER Jr 30.1 29nd St:. B,WLL"ZR BRACHt FL, 34634 (823).693.7800 COPIES TO: Thursday, September 10, 1998 COMMISSION SEP 19 1996 Mayor Garvey Cltyy of Clearwater Pnr-6S P.O. Box 4748 ! CLERK / ATTORNEY Clearwater, Fl. 34016 Dear Mayor Garvey, I am writing to you unsollclted conceming the newspaper article written about the Clearwatw Alrpark. I am a pilot of 30 years and presently a Captain with 9outwvest Airlines. I have grown up in general aviation all my Iffe, I have had the goad fortune of personally owning several small alroraft, the leaf two of which I had based at your Clearwater Atrpartc, I can tell you from past experience that letting someone run an airport that has not had a lot of experience can be disastrous. In the long run it oould mean blg losses for the city and possibly closure of the Cfiy Alrpark (The grass roots of General Aviation, even us Airline pilots start In airports like yours) I cant toil you how Important it is to have someone with experience running your airport. I have traveled this country numerous times, from IttUs airport to tittle airport, and watched them dose up and go away because of mismanagement. Without sounding prejudloe. I must say that I read this newspaper article and can't help but feel that this is all cauaW by someone's personal political agenda In City Mal. While 1 only know of Mr. EmehalY on a business level, having kept my airplane at your airport for several yem. I can say without reservations that he has done an %datanding job. I would also like to commar t on his FBO In Tampa. Please keep In mind that this Is just my personal opinion, having not been privileged to any of the meetings of the Hillsborough Aviation Authority. My case in point 1s that it was very obvious that they were looking for an excuse to force Mr. Em off the airport at his expense. Dealing with the EPA Is no small teak. I think If you look over at Mr. Emsh *IT% facility In Tampa you will see It still standing. Empty of course thus allowing no compett8on for the only remaining F80 which I am told 1s part owned by the Tampa Airport, how convanient wouldn't you sayl Why attack a mans character and k togrity for trying to do things right. In the M IS years I have enjoyed flying out of the town of Clearwater and have heard nothing but the utmost respect for Mr. Emshoff. I think you arc very fortunate to have a gentlemen with his experience level and Intagdty running your airport. Its apparent to me that he has been paying his bills and has brought alot of money to the Tex base of this cttty with al raait sates and fuel sales. I I am not a polltlclan, that's why I vote for people like you. Please listen to your cxa tstituonts like me who know slot about avlatlon and don't wont to see it wined or restrtoted anymore. Please stop this political witch hunt in city hall and let Mr. Emshoff do his job. I look forward to many good years at the Clearwater Alrpark and I thank you for your time. either Y' 0919/1996 14 I •K;.f X33 FROM Cl*arwal.fr AC S4105 TO 4626720 P401 Sept. 19.199kPIES TO COMMISSION SEP 191996 Dear Mayor Garver,and cammiesionera, PI?tSS CLERK / ATTORNEY I am outraged at the articla in the St. Pete Times today regarding the kirpark. a Why do you want to changa our FBO Rick Emshoff ? Do you know something that we don't ? Is there a conflect of interest ? If you are worried that Rick Emahoff filed for Bankruptcy , three year.p• ago , -ohy didn't you oaks a change them why wait until now ? Surely, he hat proved himself by •nove. The people vho signed the petition approx (250) are all veementlZ opposed to change. Please consider our I undertatkknding. snd desires in this matter. . 1 ' ?Res ectful y yours, ?l I Mara Hendrix (Mrs.) 3 3 1 I pilot I F • 1111 09.#19.,11996.14133 FROM Ciearuator AC Sals,} TO 162672E P.82 'COPIES I-0. Sap?.?f9`+rA ?199 ? . vi?7 f Dear Mayor Garvey and Commiesionerst S EP 1596 Ref: Clearwater Air Park. CLeRK1 4T-F0RNEY We are extremely concerned that a change in our Fixed Baaed Operatto•r Mr. Rick Emshoff voUld be for the worst and not the bettor. Approximabely 250 users of the airpark signed a petition (bent to city hall) declared this. Phase consider our knowledge and wishes to thin matter, by-eupporti,ng us. 1 Yours sincerely i 1 s • i 4 Dc nald ?H*drix Aircraft Owner N21965 I • 1 • f i i TOTAI P 011 09/19/1996 16:15 8134491490 PH0TMWN 47-. RIC TECH PAGE 01 2028 Palmetto Su"t Clawwatw, FL 3462S phologramnlatrla Phow. 913.411-1913 <i 'D Techno!° las, Inc. Fax: 813.449-1490 aW Mamrkk Aerial &rvws September 19, 1996 CORDS TO: COMMISSION SEP 19 1996 CITY OF CLSARWATHR CONIlVIISSIONBRB CLEARWATER, FLORIDA . ph,-",b AT FAX NO.: 813-462-6720 CLERK / ATTORNEN Dear City of Clearwater Commissioners, I have read the article in today's paper concerning the lease of the Airpark, I have had my company,e aircraft based at the airpark for over fifteen yow and am perfectly saftfied that Rick Emshoff has the experience, determination and resources to continua operation of the airpark. He has alWAY satisfied our requirements at the tdrplxrk. Him bankruptcy at the Tampa Aliport was brought on largely by the ;fflure of others and nox his inability to taaaago his finances. I stand in his favor and in pposition to any change in management of the' airpark, Very truly yours, B'H C Tg',C.' MOLOGIESi, INC. ab HAMEUCK AERIAL SURVEYS 0441'n 147&e'?! e?? Dean L. Green, PSM President DLQfjg 960919oa.doc PxolmmUMIC Oa+untAW$ u Soma PW=Z0NMV * AIRM PHVML M DIWAL TOP0aRAM AND DATA Brun MAMM a UQUAL ORT1t0 GtAOINO . ESTAWuuu 1970 i FROM SLIFLOR l DA A t R/Fax A PH3,r= NO, 813 449 1232 Sep. 13 19% 03: 05PM P1 V?JFJ "SOUTH • 1 EST FLORIDA R., ?,. .. !' . COPIES 'TO'- • i ComOssio, P. 9'1996 ''Attf 'The'Matyor. ai zORNEY •arid :City, Commi,•seiane it .' t ', 9,.19,:9,x. ? ..••' .' •;,,, .. •• •,. .' E I. have ust. %read `-the article int day.:'s, paper•, ; .'re ri%tding who "should-, be' i akded the; & rpott'' pontreat. In o .niq>r?i, ''Mt,. Rick,'$mmhof4 i 6-.,'thq `very b, 't qual.i f i# d- ; 04 date' ava imbl ei : eand i should, )?&*•retainod.: % 41 '..• . Z. eyy` a; known ' Mr. '' mdh'off 'poi, t+lznost 20• years er;id. •ljaV ' gne at - ?lerast; eado1'7. gi grolls bu's ino aea' in,'aivq? ft pleb 'with "him-. -,.Re : •ie a .utan,•,af 't.ota - integtity .ahd ' hie , ' min . am' ,l.?er :wish the'benkrupta mitdatioi 'n '?ah. e nd 1'' know .for • a''.feot . tha' it' Kemm ostly from- the sot ' qt hi' taa'as, lased "'in, a positl", to A t tip ''fuel' i3P1114 rating be3bk, o ,whep 'the s Army ,umed: the fial.d'.as a: gra:84 , f' i We' l.. don't ° b+t .'3.e>aye' . hat . Any td i r divdual.. viqu'ld' . • •r . 5 ; : had 'tfia' a 't V lob., } .:Regfira qq Wt was iddreaaad'.in'. .iho.. pape?rr rr• HQw,''i,? pd1 be . , ' X'eeponklble, fps?..what ,p r k ' dr n ut ' uLl.es, and ;?regulvit noe nto: mba •''th+?ii4 the ,p6b.,'of '•T, s i •, ;lJ?r?AA?' and ',rhDx!•'ti0.`„ .' w '.• • ':: " f? t' '? 'have olibaxVOd•'v?'. ' $mehof f '.mairiy tiinaa; giving Bound ettdviaa,'eand 'voi?t?aA ' to.'1ae~e?1' i1ots. tend to, •13;it9h ; aka' his weay ,of"resont ng. thi'rig>a.;.s.'a coax paolplo xepand to.. ,x Npeak' z'oni,pnrnotyexl: expa?rf.erioe 'as a':nviaitot ' $Piuover 17F'000 flight; •houro ' 'a toxrnex• F ?.'exesmine ratio , 9ondiiazed 'on'. the ' average 'Cf 361?+:1light cheakir . per ' ysAt- 1 ,Ln-,4 -fLisld, 'and',ain 'such' re6ogni•ze. 1: profaimiion I pthet. pxof e a one#.' -Mr: 'Zm ?hoff,'.im'' a dediaaad rr0960giona " who : is; >a 'axedi ''tc. the ' Lnduatry •. and "our' eltlY', . ' ux'?# a 'be' k4tdined' -a s airpout 1h4nnget* ; f. I It ' LEARWATE.R AIR BARK 1000 NORTH,HU10PLEt3 '? ct.?ARINATEA,, FLbRI?A ,3a8?? ?, 1b1ephan6'(B13)442.0000 '. •Fox .("14449-123? ' . + '' , . ,ft6aN,', OLANEfkESOAOLCOM .. 9-19-1996 5 t 17PM FROG i = SEVENPLUS 813+734+1019 P. 2 I DELI L010. 044 MTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. 1480Beltrees Street, Suite 8' Dunedin, Aortda X697 8181734-M11 F=8131734-1019 COPIES r0, SION 181'P 19 rsss September 190 1996 PkESs CLERK ' ATT'ORNE'Y City Commissioners City of CleamWer, Florida Bear Commissioners, I mn a sevweuteen thousand hour fill-rate pilot and have had a business relationship with Richard Lmshoff prior and during his fifteen year m ugemart of Clearwater Airpwk. It is in my opinion that Mr, bnnshoffdeMtely hag the qualification; and probably understands the situation at the Airpark better than anyona I know, Over the past many years and during the term ofW. ImshoSs lease, I swwd on the Afrpark Board and found that ho.. ar always willing to dla ss any problem relating to the Airpark. ' I am one wbo emphatically eves that Ivfr. Imshoff should be retained as manager of the Clearwater AirparL 5 S Wlllisat Y. Fry . ' . Pmsidem WIF!j?mac . t .i , 4 fi t SEP-19-19% 17:12 FROM Date: To: 9/19196 TO Commissioner Karen Seel Fax Phone: 1 813462-6720 From: 1 wait Powell Subject: ; Clearwater Airpark 4&26720 P.01 COPIES To. COMMISSION SEP 19 1996 CLERK I pr7,oR,,v I have used thb Airpark since moving to Clearwater in 1969 and feel 'that It is a tremendous asset to the city which is not fully understood or appreciated. Please support it any inlay that you can. In 1984 Peggy and I purchased our first plane, a Piper Lance, from Rick Emshoff. Since then, we have bought and sold another aircraft with Rick in addition to se4eral other business dealings with him and the Xrpark. In all of the transactions, we have found Rick to be honest and above reproach. If there was a problem, he gave us the benefit of the doubt. If we needed help or advice, he was there. Please, do not be concerned with his problems in Tampa. He deserves the lease and will run the Airpark for Clearwater in a way that will benefit the City and make us all proud. of the beautiful facilty we have. a TOTFL P.01 ? -e Z: 3(451 G? C?wal? ? Office of the Commission TO: Betty Deptula, City Manager FROM: Commissioner Karen Seel S COPIES: Mayor and Commissioners Rich Baler, City Engineer SUBJECT: Airpark Pommy, Infrastructure FBO and Enterprise FUnd DATE: September 25, 1996 GOP11-C, TO rC1m".0' :c?r1t? SEF w 199 Ct_FRK , gr-COR??-, Before, during and after the consideration of the ranking of the FBO operator, I have many concerns and questions about the Clearwater AhWk. . G Lack of goals for Airpark. Do we consider priorities of Economic Development, Tourism, Community Benefit, Emergency Relief, Rate of Return on Investment, Golf Course, or what? It is unclear as to what we expect and wish for the outcome. 0' Who uses the Airpark - resident or non-resident. Business usage? What foes are charged and who charges and who benefits? o Why wasn't an Airport Authority member on the FBO Committee? o Policy and direction needed - is this an Enterprise Fund? What infrastructure improvements should the City provide and at what cost? What are future goals for the Airpark? Maintain or grow? G The Current FBO operator: 1) What were his goals and outcomes? Did he perform to these expectations? 2) Lease and other payments - during the last 15 years, were these paid tidy and correct? 3) Under the lease, the City can audit yearly. Have we audited (other than this year) and if not, why? 4) Shouldn't we require all City of Clearwater licenses and leases to submit annual audits? o U CA, Page 2 5) Have all FAA rules been followed? b) Has the FBO operator invested in equipment and/or facilities over the last 15 years? Why or why not? 7) In regards to the FBO's other corporation and its bankruptcy, what debts were discharged? What debts have been paid? o For the future: Have we examined how other local aiWks operate? We should look at their standards for performance, goals, rent, marketing plans, local market (resident and business) and other aspects of operation. .0 We have the ability to provide for a reasonable policy and outcome for our Airpark. I would appreciate that the concerns expressed be addressed before we proceed with any airpark decisions. I a CITY OP CLEARWATER REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FIXED BASE OPERATOR CLEARWATER AIRPARK 1000 Hercules Avenue Clearwater, FL 34625 (813)462-6970 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FIXED BASE OPERATOR - CLEARWATER AIRPARK CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEARWATER , FLORIDA PURPOSE: The City of Clearwater is offering a profitable and improved business opportunity for a five year lease agreement with a prospective Fixed Base (tperator to furnish aviation services at its Clearwater Executive Airpark. DESCRIPTION OF CLEARWATER AND THE CLEARWATER AIRPARK: The City of Clearwater is located midway along the west coast of peninsular Florida directly on the Gulf of Mexico. Clearwater is a residential city with a permanent population ofapproximately 100,000. In addition, Clearwater has a tourist population of approximately 20,000. The City is widely known for Clearwater Beach, one of the most beautiful beaches in the country. Clearwater is the county seat of Pinellas County and is part of the Tampa Bay metropolitan area which includes the cities of Tampa and St. Petersburg, Clearwater Airpark is currently operating as a general aviation airport. The Airpark provides an uncontrolled three thousand foot runway with base operations support, fuel sales, flight line service, aircraft rental, hangar and tie down rental, aircraft maintenance, aircraft charter and flight training. The lease property of the Airpark is approximately 19 acres. The Airpark currently has approximately 10 enclosed T-hangars, 40 shaded tie down spaces, 30 paved tie down spaces and approximately 60 grass spaces. CITY FWE YEAR AMPARK DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The City proposes to develop and improve Airpark Facilities over a period of time. Following is the proposed five year facility improvement plan: Year One: 17 New Enclosed Hangars & Low Intensity Runway Lights Year Two: 8 New Executive Enclosed Hangars Year Three: Runway Extension on Both Ends of the Runway Year Four: New Terminal Building Year Five: Vehicle Parking Lot Expansion CURRENT FU ED BASE OPERATOR LEASE AGREEMENT & PROPOSED BUSINESS PLAN: Copies of the current Fixed Base Operator Lease and proposed City of Clearwater Five Year Airpark Business Plan are available upon request by contacting the Engineering Services Division of the Engineering Department at 8134626970 or at new phone number 813-562-4747 after May 6i* 1996. FIXED BASE OPERATOR RESPONSIBILIMS: 1, Maintain lease structures in their present condition. Major maintenance to maintain structural integrity of the leased structures will be the responsibility of the City. 2. Comply with requirements of the Americans With Disabilities Act. 3. Lease all hangar and tie-down space with standard lease form. 4. Sale of aviation petroleum products. 5. Aircraft rental. b. Repair and maintenance of Aircraft. 7. Enforcement of Airpark Mules and Standards as approved by the City. 8. Maintenance mowing of all grass areas within the Airpark. 9. All utility bills including: electrical power, telephone, cable, water, storm water, sanitary sewer, refuse collection, gas and any other services to premises when due. 10. All equipment, merchandise and supplies for the operation of the main terminal building. 11. Any and all sales and property taxes that may apply. 12. All applicable insurance required by the City of Clearwater. 13. Employee at least two full time employees properly trained in aircraft fueling and ramp safety procedures. 14. Normal hours of operation from sunrise to sunset. Airpark Manager at Airpark during regular business hours. FIXED BASE OPERATOR BUSINESS OPPORTUNTMS: Aircraft sales, Flight Instruction, Flying Club(s), Aerial Surveying, Sightseeing, Air Taxi Operations, Air Freight Operations, Charter Operations or any other related aeronautical activity which may be approved by the City in the Lease Agreement. ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED AT THE AIRPARK: Night flying, banner towing, glider towing, ultra-light airplane operations, hot air ballooning and sport parachuting. SUBMPITALS: The following submittals will be required as part of the RFP: - Name of Finn, - Location of Office or offices; - Name(s), qualifications and experience of personnel who would perform the service of Fix Base Operator. - List of credit references and a financial pro forma that will provide information about resources which will insure success in operating the Clearwater Airpark. - Experience and qualifications to operate a general aviation airport. Please separately describe the income or return to the City upon award of a lease agreement, including proposed terms of the long-term least (e,g., amount of base rent, percentage of gross sales, etc) and in every respect describe the arrangement the respondent desires with the City.. SUBMITTAL DEADLINE AND SUBMITTAL LOCATION: The deadline for response to this Request For Proposal is 4:00 p.m., Friday, June 28, 1996, Ten (10) Copies of responses should be submitted in sealed envelope marked: "PROPOSAL FOR CLEARWATER AIRPARK FDMD BASE OPERATOR", to: Mr. George McKibben Purchasing Manager City of Clearwater P. 0. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 or deriver to: City of Clearwater, Municipal Services Building, Purchasing Office, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, 3rd Floor, Rm. 310, Clearwater, Florida 34616 Questions regarding this request for proposal or requests to inspect Airpark facilities should be submitted in writing to: Mr. Richard J. Baier, P.E. City Engineer Attn: Mr. Glen Bahnick, Civil Engineer City of Clearwater, Engineering P. 0. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 Answers will be provided in writing as written addenda to this request for proposal. CALENDAR OF EVENTS: Release date of M Bid Opening date, time & place Selection of top candidates Vendor Presentations Selection committee recommendation City Commission Action Contract initiation 04/22/96 06/28/96 4:00 PM (Purchasing Office) 0'7118196 08/05196 08/12/96 10/03/96 02/10/97 NOTE: Dates subject to change upon notification. I EVALUATION CRITERIA: The following criteria will be used to evaluate the proposal packages: 1. Overall economic return to the City. 2, fullness of resources to operate the Airpark. 3. Prior experience in the aviation industry and operation of an airports). 4. Safety ofAirpark Operations. MISCELLANEOUS: A. Please refer to Appendix A for standard requirements. B. Please refer to Appendix B for insurance requirements. C. Please refer to Appendix C for vicinity maps. a` I APPENDIX A Slandgrd-Rea-vilrements-for " for Proposals" Any actual or prospective bidder who is aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or award of a contract may seek resolution of his/her complaints by contacting the Purchasing Manager. 2. No Corrections Once a competitive proposal is submitted, the City shall not accept any request by any proposer to correct errors or omissions in any calculations or competitive price submitted. 3. Openness of Pro ure-me Now Written competitive proposals, other submissions, correspondence, and all records made thereof, as well as negotiations conducted pursuant to this RFP, shall be handled in compliance with Chapters 119 and 285 Florida Statutes. The City gives no assurance as to the confidentiality of any portion of any proposal once submitted. 4. No Collusign By offering a submission to the RFP, the proposer certifies the proposer has not divulged to, discussed or compared his/her competitive proposal with other proposers and has not colluded with any other proposers or parties to this competitive proposal whatsoever. 5. Informality Waiver/RejWion-of Bid? The City reserves the right to reject any responses and to waive any irregularity variance or informality whether technical or substantial in nature, in keeping with the interests of the City. 6. r rig i n l u The City, as an entity of government, is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this contract for each and every fiscal year following the fiscal year in which this contract is executed and entered into and for which this contract shall remain in effect. Upon notice that sufficient funds are not available in the subsequent fiscal years, the City shall thereafter be released of all terms and other conditions. 7. The Vendor shall defend, indemnify, save and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, suits, judgments and liability for death, personal injury, bodily injury, or property damage arising dhe<:uy or indirectly from the performance by Vendor, its employees, subcontractors, or assigns, including legal fees, court costs, or other legal expenses. Vendor acknowledges that it is solely responsible fof complying with the terms of this RFP. In addition, the Vendor shall, at its expense, secure and provide to City, prior o beginning erformance under this RFP insurance coverage's as required in this RFP. APPENDIX B CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEARWATER AIRPARK RFP FOR FIXED BASE OPERATOR INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Liability Ins nao.. The Vendor shall furnish, pay for, and maintain during the life of the contract with the City the following liability coverage's: a. Comprehensive General Liability insurance on an "occurrence" basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. b. Worker's Compensation Insurance applicable to its employees, if any, for statutory coverage limits in compliance with Florida laws. 2. Additional Insured. The City is to be specifically included as an additional insured on all liability coverage described above. 3..Notice of Cancellation or Restriction. All policies of insurance must be endorsed to provide the City with thirty (30) day's notice of cancellation or restriction. 4. Certificates of Insurance/Certified Copies of Policies. The Vendor shall provide the City with a certificate or certificates of insurance showing the, existence of the coverage's required by this RFP. The Vendor will maintain these coverage's with a current certificate or certificates of insurance throughout the term stated in the proposal. When specifically requested by the City in writing, the Vendor will provide to the City with certified copies of all policies of insurance as required above. New certificates and new certified copies of policies, if certified copies of policies have been requested, shall be provided to the City whenever any policy is renewed, revised, or obtained from other insurers. 5. The address where such certificates and certified polices shall be sent or delivered is as follows: City of Clearwater Attention: Engi leering Department, Airpark Liaison P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618-0748 rla a <J?SNan ?. N ? I W -.00 lb,. E wr M S ? 0 c? s s?srr SCALE N.T.S. SUNNMAU %va ocation of MAN dripark Lease FL F CALULIET S1 w? 0 = ?I #? 000 AK MrEAVER AR1( OR %?AND 6 0 a UN T0 f AIRPORT p!1 YAR1L 57 YAR7L171 151P 51- im4WF2 ??gl -;,, ?N ao ST F773 57 U. Ll t ST nnnnnn SHERWOOD STREET ,%j?•%; j j.• a ?• . AIRPARK LEASE DESCRIPTION GRAND AV /?/ .?//•?//;?;1/ ;•!l S 0 400 800 SCALE FEET S-T-R: 12-29-15 THS IS NOT A SURVEY AIRPARK.DWG DRAWN BY. RBW DATE: 10/24/95 1 i!/ii ii!/i? 1,90 :i. GILBERT STREET w D z a <h w J D U w CENTER C SEC. 12-29- P.O.B AMPARK LEASE UESCRiPTION GRAND AVENUE N ? I W?Relim- E s S rE Z .. . N 4 s971 WW of J, 0, 00, s 89,21 'WE =15W 17 ?r, 400 04, TZ .., J, 1* op d, .1 10 of 00 / .* ?/ ! l 01 /, , / 40' ol x1o /, ? 24682.01 S. f. , 18.93 acres 41 /i/ ;? ',?'/? S-T-R: 12-29--15 , 0 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY DRAWING NOT TO SCALE LEASE.DWG 0 ?, DRAWN BY: RBW do DATE. 1/5/96 .?, I -2 .3W I AIRPORT DRIVE Not To Scale P.A.B. Ld Z Q V) W J M v Ix w H Proposal for Fixed Base Operator Sevices Clearwater Airpark, Clearwater, Florida Submittar: Kenneth L. Love, D/B/A Armament Systems Company 1901 Douglas Avenue Clearwater, Florida 34615 Mail: P.O. Box 151 Dunedin, Florida 343697-0151 Submittal: After review of the request for proposal from the City of Clearwater dated 22 April, 1996, we wish to .present the following proposal for your consideration: I. Responsibilities to be assumed upon satisfactory transfer of operation from the present operator: A. General maintenance of leased structures after review and evaluation,by all parties involved or their. representative. B. Review and renewal-of existing leases and issuance -of new leases when space is available. C. Sale and dispensing of aviation fuel and lubricants. D. Provide adequate staffing and supervisor for airside operations and aicraft fueling. E. Supply aircraft rental availibilty, flight school services, and repair and maintenance facility services. -1- F. General support services and materials for main terminal building daily functions. G. General utilities service for main terminal facility. H. General utility services for the main termminal facility such as: electric, water,sanitary sewer, refuse, telephone, and reasonable services that might benefit customers after review of the present billings. 2. All reasonable and proper property, sales, and user taxes after review. J. Maintain reasonable and nominal hours of operation for airport proper and oversee hours for related services. Ii. Special Responsibilities: A. Compliance with ADA Review: After review of the listed problem areas of the existing facility, we deem these to be problems with areas outside of the existing structures, areas within the structure that are a major part of the structure, or internal components which function satisfactorily as they exist but are non-conforming to ADA guidelines. We will as part of this agreement address the following phases of the ADA list for immediate execution: 1. Specify physically inpaired parking spaces with appropriate sins and marking. 2. Install grab bars in rest rooms facilities where appropriate: 3. Relocate mirrors in rest rooms if reasonably possible. -2- 4. Relocate towel dispensers to appropriate location We shall strive to solve other ADA compliance problems listed as a function of a general rennovation of the 'interior of the main terminal facility and will work with the City of,. Clearwater personnel to comply where reasonable and beneficial to all parties. B.. Maintainence of Clearwater Airpark grass areas: After reviewing the existing situation at the facility and the associated cost involved, we assume for the first year, or for a period longer if the new hangers are not completed within that year, fifty percent (50) of a reasonable cost of mowing the grass areas. After the successful completion and occupancy of the new hangers and no loss of income from the rework of Hanger"A". we will assume the full cost of mowing as an offset against available income from' the new hanger leases. III. Princ iplal Personel: Kenneth L. Love: SS Mechanical Eng. MS Aerospace Eng. Past partner: Vandenberg Airport, Inc, Board of Directors: Sun n Fun Foundation-Lakeland Private pilot A and P license -3- 3 . I y c e 1 la t i . Charles 'Presnell; General manager: Vandenberg Airport- 14 years IV. Financial: Performance bond for the amount of US $ 300,00.00 will be issued to the City of Clearwater before assumption of any duties. V. Financial Renumeration to City of Clearwater: First year: $ 3,500,00 per month plus. $ 0.06 per gallon of aviation fuel Second year: $ 4,500.00 per month plus $ 0.06 per gallon of aviation fuel(based on completion of new hangers) Third through Fith year: $ 5,000.00 per month 'plur. $ 0.05 per gallon of aviation fuel Thank you for consideration of our proposal. Regards; Kenneth L. Love -4- rime, Proposal for Fixed Base Operator Services Clearwater Airpark, Clearwater, Florida Submittor: Kenneth L. Love D/B/A Armament Systems Company 1901 Douglas Avenue Clearwater, Florida.34615 Mail; P.O. Box 151 Dunedin, Florida 34697-0151 Clearwater Airpark Request for Proposal Errata. A. Addendum to Section 1: Responsiblilities for Clearwater Airpark: Insurance limit requirements for Clearwater Airpark coverage as specified in the RFP for liability are met by the proposal and damage coverage for the existing structures is • F included to their present worth. B. Addendum to Section III: Financial: The renumeration increase during the third through fifth years is directly tied to the i revision of the plan to rework hanger "A". These revenues based on the following: 1. Hanger "A" is not to be disassembled and completely rennovated, but rather to be rehabilitated as required for structural soundness, safety, functionability, and, cosmetic value. The three estimates I have requested indicate the cost range should be within a range of $30,000.00 to $38,000.00. -1- This action would then achieve a, sound structure and visual enchancement of the Airpark. The remaining monies from the $100,00.00 to allocated to, the Hanger "A" rebuild would then be utilized to convert Hanger "B", a present shade hanger, to a "T" hanger configuration by enclosing the existing structural frame. The structure of Hanger "B" was apparently designed from the outset to be modified to "T" hanger configuration and only minimal reinforcement would be required to the structure. It would be necessary to supply sliding doors, outer coverings,' electrical service, and cosmetic enhancements to match Hanger A to provide a more useful structure as well as larger income base and more valuable asset to the City of'C learwater. The estimates received on the possible conversion of Hanger"B" range from.$56,000.00 to $71,000.00. Respectfully yours; Kenneth L., Love R -2- Mary Carotenuto Attorney at Law 3000 Gulf To Bay Blvd. 5ulte 209 Clearwater. FL 34619 Telephone (813) 725-0270 Fax (879) 797-7826 June 27, 1996 Mr. George McKibben Purchasing Manager City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 i i! . Dear Mr. McKibben: The following is in response to the specific requests set forth in the proposal for Clearwater Airpark Fixed Base Operator: Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. 1000 North Hercules Avenue Clearwater, FL 34625 Locatian of Office 1000 North Hercules Avenue ' ' Clearwater, FL 34625 Name(s). aualifications_and_eaR ricnce Q ` `'; of Fix Base_ Operator 1{ I .; Clarence Emshoff (see resume attached hereto) All counter and line personnel are trained in fueling of aircraft and have some flying t experience lAst_of Credit References and Finandal ro forma ?i ' - - See document attached hereto !I I E c? i. L'•'J$IhEii:fi.itiufikfas'.7s1rw}x.+..«-.?. .. .. ... ...._.. w..E.?Naas..m..,ow...E. ,. .,.. .. .. ...,... ,., .,...... .- .. .. ,... .• ...• .-. .. ,, .. Rick Emshoff has operated Clearwater Airpark for approximately fifteen (15) years. During this time, the animosity between the airport and the neighbors subsided and j a the airport has been running smoothly and without any complications. In addition, there was a petition started by the people based at the airport and nearly 100% supported Mr. II ;, Emshoff to continue to operate the airport. As you can see from his enclosed resume, Mr, Emshoff'has been operating airports for approximately 35 years. During this time, he has been an active charter pilot and flight instructor. He has taught ground school and supervised the maintenance and feeling operations. (Please see resume of Clarence Emshoff attached hereto) A t ilb th OI f i rrangemen w - eJ X All terms and provisions of current lease shall be maintained. In addition, all previously negotiations with the City shall be followed as set forth below; A. Rent shall be $4,450.00 per month B. Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. shall maintain the grounds for $8,500.00 I C. Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. shall rent the new hangers. The distribution of revenue shall 4 ; be 75% of revenues collected to the City and 25% to Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. D. Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. shall bring the building as close to ADA Standards as is economically feasible. s to improve the building. E. Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. shall perfo re oZ70 7 ? Per ?q /D?'r 0,7 f J S ' ,r r ' If ou ave any questions, please call meat (813) 725-0270 or Clarence (Rick) at (813 y } } 443-3433. i i i ei . If ?i ?I CLARENCE EMSHOFF 1000 NORTH'HERCULES AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34625 (813) 443-3433 EDUCATION Lincoln High School, graduated June 1958 Milwaukee, Wisconsin University of Omaha 1958 to 1962 Omaha, Nebraska; courses in cartography, history, etc. Aeronautical chart and Information Center St. Louis, Missouri; courses in cartography WORK EXPERIENCE 1958 to 1962 United States Air Force cartographer; Offitt Air Force Base; Omaha, Nebraska 1962 to 1964 Harley Davidson Motor Company Machinist; Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1962 to 1975 GranAire General manager and Chief Pilot Timmerman Field; Milwaukee, Wisconsin maintenance, charters, flight school, storage of aircraft approximately 50 employees 1976 to 1978 Emshoff Aviation, Inc. Owner. Watertown, Wisconsin maintenance, charters, flight school, storage of aircraft approximately 10 employees 1978 to Present Suncoast Aviation, Inc. Based in St. Petersburg Clearwater Airport, Clearwater Airpark, and Tampa International Airport maintenance, charters, flight school, storage of aircraft approximately 80 employees at Tampa International Airport; approximately 10 employees at Clearwater Airpark FLYING EXPERIENCE Total Hours 18,000 Ratings: Airline Transport Pilot; Multi-engine land; commercial pilot; airplane single engine land and sea; commercial rotorcraft helicopter Flight Instructor; airplane single engine, multi-engine, instrument Advanced ground school instructor; Instrument ground school instructor Date 01/15/96 Time ? 12:54 AM CLEARWATER-AIRCRAFT Page no. 1 As of 12/31/95 SAL ANTE SHEET - Account ---------- Account Name General Acct ---------------------- ----- -- - Detail Acct . ' . 11011 - - -- ------------ Petty Cast) ------------ =.00 11021 Checkina Account r?gr4.31 ..' 11022 Payroll Account' 0.00 .11041 A7R 1448e- 11072 INVENTORY 10000.00 12011 FIXED ASSETS--1993 10000.00 12012 FIXED ASSETS--TRACTOR 5000.00 ''' 12021. FIXED ASSET'S-1994 900.00 ,:. .12022 Accum. Deprec - Building -750.00 Total Assets ------------ 45996.9" i i ii .3 r f t U:ite O1/15?'7+:• C.LEARWATER-AIRCRAFT Time 12:54 AM As or 12/31/95 C • s BALANCE SHEET Account Account Name General Acct Detail Acct ---------- _------------------ -------------- _ .? ..--_----- -------------- 210411 EXCISE TAX 0.00 210422 SALES TAX PAYABLE. 0.00 2201 OWNER Payable 2061x3.11 ------------ Total Liabilities 20!??"s.12 '31021 STOCK 2000.00 3293 1993 Profit/Loss. -7221.00 33 Current Earnings -a5`?2•:•3 Currant Year Earni ngs 33618,17 ------------ Total Equity' 25303.a4 ------------ Total Liabilities Plus Equity 4599c . ?F• E:. Date : O1f'l;fit Tiae : 12:57 AN Account 3065. 3148 3300 3302 '3305. 3348 4302 4006 4006 4010 4011 4016 4031 4034. 4040 4042 4048 4054 4060 43081 4401 44041 4406 5000 5101 52082 52101 5212 ' 5302 5303 CLEARWATER-AIRCRAFT Account Name SALES TAX EXCISE TAX FUEL SALE OIL SALES RAMP . MISC Insurance Total Revenue ADVERTISING POSTAGE ` TELEPHONE CHARTER CONNISION DUES 6 SUBSCRIPTIONS RISC RENT TAXES-PERSONAL PROPERTY UTILITIES SHIPPING OFFICE SUPPLIES 6LG GROUND HAINT OUTSIDE WORK COUNTER ACCESSORIES FUEL-COST, OIL COST SALARIES AIRCRAFT COST Insurance PROFESSIONAL FEES ACCOUNTING FEES Interest Bank Charges Total Expanses NET. INCOME V U1- From 01101/95 to 12/31/95 INCOME STATEMENT This Period General Acct Detail Acct 168.06 86.24 11465.86 56.54 10831.57 6144.40 0.00 26774.67 71.75 32.00 292.52 612.00 0.00 0.00 5293.16 0.00 206.61 39.75 1052.73 0.00 0.00 914.04 0.00 67.62 82)4.4-3 13042.23 2S3,"31 150.00 0.00 0.00 160.41 330544.64 -1110.17 Fa4e no. 4 Year to Date General ACCt Mall Acct ' Sib .71 21.12 14014i.b3 1344.39 121747.65 574168.13 0.00 ------------ 638040.03 97M2 39"3.00 14072.62 4224.47 215.00 167.20 55400.51 56335.10 15426.07 a61.35 6366.00 10501.60 -x16.'[9 27246.76 71162.37 1426.41 64051.15 437621.25 6545.06 5405.41 424.06 11464.23 1529.43 604427,66 35614.11 l TO-- CITIZENS BANK OF CLEARWATER, 1150 Cleveland St., P. a, Box 539, Clearwater, FL 34617 IYPE Of CREDIT - CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX (Name of Landed ? Individual If you hock IhA bon, prowde Financial Inlotmotron only about yourself ? Joint, with Rstalmmship -. 11 you check this bon, provide Financial Inlormalion about yourself and Ilia other arson PERSONAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF NOTE Any willful misrepresentation could result in a violation of Federal Law (Sec. I a U S C. 10141 BItih Narne CLARENCE E. EMSHOFF Dale AUf Lj 940 isAC_Slatement Dat.6-26-46 Is- AddiesM DOLPHIN POINT Ci1yCLFAa A_M._ SisioneLORIDA sm.of sec q. 397-36-8753 Home A"-3500 No of Dependent% C Bus or OeXpia4t_ out phOA 3-3433 NOTE: Corn lets all of Section 11 BEFORE Section SECTION I ASSETS s.i.oa 0.1 cn++s LIABILITIES :MU' mini r%-#16 1 Cash On Hand & in Banks Sec II•A 90 00 00 21 Notes Due to Banks Sac 11•A 4 000 0 2 Cash Value of Life Insurance sac 11.0 1 500 00 22 Notes Due to Relatives a Friends Site. 11•H 00 3 US Gov Securities Sec II•C 23 Notes Due to Others Sec 11-H . ?.._ 0 4 Other Marketable Securities Sec II•C 12 109 37 24 Accounts & Bills Payable Sec II•H 5 Notes d Accounts Receivable . Good See 11•D 10 000 00 25 Unpaid Income Tones Due • ? Federal ? State 6 Other Assets Readily Converlibte to Cash • Itemize 26 Other Unpaid Taxes & tnlerast I on 7 27 Loans on L+le Insurance Policies Sic 11-a 1 00 B 20 Contract Accounts Payable See 11•H 00 9 29 Cash Rent Owed 00 10 TOTAL CUAnENT ASSETS 1 30 Other Liabilities Due within 1 Year • Itemize 0 11 Real Estate Owned Sec It E 324 00 0 31 12 Mortgages & Contracts Owned Sec 11 4 32 13 Notes & Accounts Receivable • Doubtful Sec 11 D 33 TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 14 holes Out From Relatives & Friends Sec 11.0 34 Neal Estate Mortgages f'syabta sec I!•E 60 00 00 15 Other Securities - Not Readily Marketable Sec WC 35 Liens & Assessments Payable 16 Personal Property S!c II•G 36 Other Debts Itemize 0 17 Other Assets • Itemize 37 16 38 Total Liabihhes 64 00 00 is 39 Mel Worth (Tara) Assets minus Total L+abilmest 102 909 F - 20 TOTAL ASSETS 66 1 ,09 40 TOTAL LIABILITIES & NET WORTH 66 09 37 ANNUAL INCOME ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL EXPENSES Salary. Bonitses & Commissions s 80 . 000.00 Income Taxes s 10. 000.00 Dividends & Interest i 11000,00 Other Taxes s 5.000.00 Rental & Lease Income INell t Insurance Premiums s 2. OOQ, 00 Alimony, child support. Or separate mainI a neneeincome need not bereveatod if Mnngage Payments - s 19,000.00 - • - you do not wish to have it considered as a basis for lp¦ying this obligation Other Income -- Itemize s ??1 Rent Payable -- - ^ s Provide the following information only it Joint Coedit is checked above Other Expensts ' a 5.000.00 Othee Pet%ons Salary, 1lonuses. & Commissions a0Q s Alimony. child support, or separate maintenance income need not b4 tovaaled s of you do not wish to have it considered as a basis for r156, ing this obligation Other Income of Other Peison-• llsmize s s TOTAL %96.000.00 101AL ? 1. 000. 00 GENERAL INFORMATION CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Are any Assets Pledged) •dJ No ? Yes ISee Section 111 As Endcrser Co maker ur Guarantor 6 00 -Are trou a Delendanl in any Suils or Legal Actinms) ®Nn ? Yes On LeAses or Contracts 6 00 IEaplainl I. *get Claims s Hare you ever been declared Bankrupt in the last 10 years) No ? Yes Federal • Slate Income Taxes s 00 traptainl Other • s 00 SH IN BANKS A NAME OI ISANiL tizens`Ban & SECTION II "ES DUE TO BANKS Wall all Real Estate Loans it Iype nr Atraum type nt Ownlrrh p On PetKilrl kaies Due (tans 10 . 000 kec ng .0 s COLLATERAL ttr Anti & Type at Owneran-p Cash on Hand s (CDo*lete Rot of Sedim 11 on Reverse Side( I OT AL S s s 11 xiN Srt 1 Liar II It.", Su 1 Im 1t( 1.7210 e/L FIRST ZINC PRINTINO. INC 1400.232.0470 SECTION 11 continued 8 LIFE INSURANCE {List only those Policies that you ownl COMPANY TAIr of Pnl.ry Cash Sunend?r Valor PnlaI Y naur L "a. anrn r Iftnem nrl 1 nano Pnl. Olrv as fn141era1 6ENFfIC14gY Conn Mutual 150Q. 0 hell Maconi TOTALS , @ s ItaNr sec. I ltaa TI IEKM gK I tlrtl T11 C SECURITIES OWNED (including U.S. Gov't Bonds and all other Stocks and Bonds) Face Valu?•aonds No of Shares Sloc* DESCRIPTION ln"'rate rhnse Pint Regrstned m Vnut Name lyre no OyVnersh,p COST Magh?I Value V S Gnv Sec Mara?tVAlt/e Mats?rable Sec Ma "91 1 VA UE Nor R.nI.,. MA.I.tehle 5trupmE5 Amount Pledged In 5?cured loans 2250 Europa Cruse Lines 3937.50 2109.37 s me 250 8000.00 10.000.00 TOTALS S 5 i s IIAIU let I Lme JI It Rif: $it 1 tint 41 linllr Sic I We 151 D _ NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (Money Payable or Owed to YoulndividuallyIndicatebys ? it Others have an Ownershiolnterestl MAILER DEBTOR When Due Ongmal Amount RAIAnre Dun Gn.1 Aernnnla BA1Rnrp Due Daubtrul Accounts eal Dne Nnl.a RA h irtenr1% 5ECUg11 Y iH AnYI Fla Landscape ,at 30.000.00 10.000.00 s s Air lane TOTALS s s s Ilrplt slt 1 It" 51 11n1ar sic I LIM 131 011F SK 11181 let E REAL ESTATE OWNED Ilndicate b a ? it Others have an Ownershi Interest) TITLE IN NAME 00 ? Deaee. rauun unn A L onto Ong.nAI Pr?aent VAI.W An.nnnl nl MORTGAGE OR CONTRACT PAYABLE u n Arnnr.etl ICnat nr Rral F Hatt Ins Cam?q onl Dare PA11n?nl M4140 -It To Whom Parable NomeHead 200 Dolphin Pt. 8-91 85.00 - s 204.000 Condo 20.00 1500 2007 W. Houle Emsho€f Odessa Mobile P rd 4- 96. 06 120.000 IM-C . Haines TOTAL I s TOTA ? 11041 sat 1 Lm 111 (ERur Sec I Ltel HI F MORTGAGES AND CONTRACTS OWNED Ilndicate by a ? if Others have an Ownershin Interest! MAKER Conk Mlge ? Name Add+ess PROPERIY COVERED SI.Irltng 001e Paymenl MAluMv BAIAnce Due s s GPERSONAL PROPERTY Ilndicate by a 1/ if Others have an Ownership Interest) raTALS1 s -tTwr<t -rj: Ill D£SCIIIPIION Dale Cott VAIu? LOANS ON PROPERTY ? r When New WnaA New Today aMnnr? Du? to Wham PayahlP AulomoA-les Ts) i an 9 0 - 000 s 00 _ 1978_Piper _Warrior N44834 00 35,000 00 1980 30Ft Srarah (gnat) 0 ,00.0 20,000 00 H NOTES Other than Bank. Mortgage and Insurance Com an Loans). TOTAL ACCOIA inlet 1 S A1ND BILLS AND CONTRACTS PAYABLE T PAYABLE 10 41Ter OhLpnet III AnYI When Due Nnles Dne It. R?I amends Nmes Du? Olh?ra iNnl e4m%%I Arrnunla A 11.11% PAIAMP Cnnuatla PAVAht? f.0LUa1£RAl III Anti Master s 4000.00 TOTALS s It s"# sec 1 l1tV III RMaI SK I u" 131 lien, son 11.+1311 Itoler Svc 1 t.Rr "I For Vw purpose at pocwirtQ cmdtl troth Ume to tune. Mot tumitA ft lofvWAnp so a tow sod Wcwate tliatalnanl d I ktor financial eonddlen. Authoritabon Is hereby 91Yart to the jpndw to vanfy in any manrwt M sarlcial Vondoicn. dams appropriate any and all Arm indtcafad on Blls stalament. The undanlpned also spook" to Wdy that Larder Irmtrdlately In wtRlnp d any tip arse ezw!!? C 4 910nrd . ? 00 r?/ _, 19 *bgnatvre G,pnaturo . r.r `• Cl? 3 PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CIPLE AIRPARK BY JOHN RICH PRESIDENT HOMECARE INDUSTRIES 2386 PARKSTREAM AV CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34619 813-556-0400 WORK 813-791-0024 HOME VISION FOR TIM AIRPARK My vision for the Airpark is to make it grow, to provide more income to all parties involved and hold a strong positive image in the community. This will start with the immediate renovation of the tired main structure and with the fulfillment of all ADA requirements. The press needs to be involved along with an official of Clearwater in order to maximize the beginning of the image changing process. This and community involvement through activities at the Airpark will result in a better understanding of the Airpark. The Airpark at Clearwater provides a valuable transportation need and yet most people see the Airpark as a noisy, dangerous and unprofitable venture for the city and a boom for a few wealthy people. Why? Because the real value of the Airpark is not being made known to those beyond the boundary of the Airpark. Fallacies and misinformation are being shared with little of the true importance of the airpark being conveyed to the public and the elected officials. An essential part of gaining support for the Airpark revolves around effective communication of the benefits the Airpark provides the community. Also people have to realize that the Airpark plays a vital role not only in the local economic picture, but in the nations infrastructure. The Airpark can and should become an economic engine for Clearwater. This will happen if you choose the correct FBO operator. The FBO operator needs to play a key role in the growth and public awareness of the Airpark. The users, benefactors, and the people who make it possible for the Airpark to survive and pay its bills need to be involved. The FBO operator needs their input and support to grow positively and provide a safe environment to attract aviation related businesses; To do this he must be a team leader and a good communicator. This communication can be addressed through informal meetings on a regular basis with representatives of both Clearwater and the users to discuss issues, problems, projects, user needs and complaints. It also would be in the best interest of the Airpark to provide users with updates to rules regulations, policies, and proposed changes through a regular newsletter. In many cases, problems arise at the Airpark due to a lack of education. The users have to educate the public on the benefits of the Airpark. This education is the primary prerequisite to the growth of the Airpark. The FBO manager can either be part of the problem by not being a leader or part of the solution by being a positive vocal leader. The manager needs to form a public relation plan for the Airpark. The purpose of this is to influence public opinion an convince people that the Airpark serves their personal self- interest or that they should subordinate their personal self interest in favor of a greater public interest. The only real talent needed here is to have the ability to: • Collect and compile accurate, factual information about the Airpark. • Communicate through basic press releases and personal letters. • Identify, get to know, and assist key media people. « Create and update mailing lists for key media people. • Prepare and deliver speeches and presentations. • Plan special events. • Write letters to the editor correcting erroneous facts. • Offer free information to teachers and leaders of the community The FBO operator needs to wort{ with the city and determine what the true economic value of the Airpark is to Clearwater. This will not be hard to do and I will do it for the City of Clearwater. The citizens and officials of Clearwater have to understand the true value of the Airpark. Without this information, the Airpark is vulnerable to those who criticize it for nuisance factors such as airplane noise or perceived safety risks. The economic impact needs to be broken down into three parts: 1. Direct Impact 2. Indirect Impact 3. Tax Impact and shared with the community. Once the citizens understand how much the Airpark contributes to the city the lives of those dealing with the Airpark will become more enjoyable. The FBO operator needs to work with the community and pilots to control the airport noise and educate the public about the noise level. In reality most complaints about noise are in the fear that if they can hear the plane it is to close to them. Education and events at the airport for the public will lessen this fear and increase the partnership between the non flying public at the flying public. Requirements of the Bid Fixed base operator responsibilities: You list fourteen requirements, all are reasonable requirements that will be met. Submittals: Name of firm - A new corporate name will be picked for the benefit of Clearwater, The new name will enhance the image the city already has and will create civic pride in the Airpark. Names and qualifications of personnel - In the event we are selected to operate the FBO the management team will consist of the following three individuals. John Rich - I am a 45 year old Minnesota transplant with a college degree. A ten year resident of Clearwater and fifteen year resident of Florida. I live in Clearwater with my wife and two children. We are active in many community activities and desire to spend the rest of our lives in this area. I have no experience operating a FBO. I am a State certified contractor and own a construction company in Clearwater that has over 50 employees and uses approximately 45 subcontractors at any one time. My business is over six years old and continues to grow every year because of planning and leadership.. I know how to manage, set goals, follow through, deal with many kinds of personalities, pay my taxes, keep excellent records, do what I say I am going to do and make a profit. Because of the size of my company I am very familiar with labor and worker's compensation laws. What I bring to the table is my ability and desire to work with both the city and citizens to bring about a common goal that is beneficial to all parties. My company has in place a wonderful management team that can operate without me, a goal of every good leader and manger. Because of this I will be able to devote my full time to improving the Airparks' physical image and business operation. I have owned five different types of airplanes, from a Cessna 172 to a King Air. My log book shows over 1000 hours and my ratings are multi engine/instrument. Mark Trippi - Because of my lack of experience in the actual operation of the FBO it will be necessary, to hire a strong manager familiar with the actual running of a FED and to aid me in setting up a procedural operating handbook. I have found, interviewed and hired such a person contingent on being awarded this bid. His name is Mark Trippi. Mark is a college graduate with a degree in marketing. He has been in the aviation business since 1968. Mark-will be my key man in the day to day operation of the Airpark. I have known Mark for three years and he is more than qualified to assume these enjoyable. tasks. Some of his qualifications are. • Managed a profitable FBO • Owned and operated a successful FBO • The C.O.O of an aircraft museum in Chicago. • A C.F.I.I. and M.I,I. • Over ten thousand hours of flying time Mark has many ideas on how to increase the public awareness and support of the Airpark. Once again for the park to be successful it must be used not hidden from the public. Terry McNay - A resident of Clearwater that was born in St. Petersburg fifty seven years ago. Terry is a retired Navy pilot and worked for Pan Am for four years. He most recently owned a business in Clearwater called Flow Line, an underground utility company, which he sold several years ago, Terry also started and completed a housing development called Country Park in Countryside. Because of his success he is now retired and flies his military airplane for enjoyment. Terry is dedicated to the idea that the Airpark can return to being a family experience if management would direct itself toward that goal, Terry would be the liaison between the EAA and warbird pilots. He also would be instrumental in setting up family activities at the Airpark. )ne needs to have a chance to interact Credit references: i? Mike Baines Executive Vice President Textured Coating Of America 5950 South Avalon Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90003 1-213-233-3111 Jennifer Murphy Branch Manager First Union National Bank 5005 Ulmerton Road Clearwater, Florida 34620 813-892-7403 Tom Roberts Galaher Graphics Inc. 712 I6'hStreet North St. Petersburg, Florida 33705 813-822-3388 Other credit names on request. If awarded the bid an account will be opened with $50,000.00 to ensure the continued success of the Airpark. With the management team that I have in place the Airpark will become a profitable part of Clearwater. The financial resources of HomeCare Industries and John Rich will be used to improve the facility at the Airpark and to assure that it will be successful. i } r i Financial Return to the City Because of the many areas that are uncertain in the long term plans of the Airpark it will be hard to do an accurate forecast of many areas. Communication will leads to a satisfactory answer for both parties for those future opportunities. At this time i am willing to offer the following to the City of Clearwater for the opportunity to be the lease holder of the Airpar€c. • A lease payment equal to what the current lease holder pays, but no less than $4,100.00 per month. • An override on all fuel sales of five cents per gallon. • Pay all taxes and assessments as per original lease agreement. • To assume the care of ground maintenance 45 days after the awarding of the lease. • To repair the building and comply with current ADA requirements The indirect financial return to the city will be much greater than the direct return if the Airpark can be operated correctly. The Airpark should continually draw business and visitors to the city. Each leaving money, not only in the Airpark, but also in the :. community. We look forward to making a formal presentation, i if so needed and desired, on August 5, 1996. r f Clearwater Airpark Clearwater, Pinellas County Florida . Bid proposal for Fixed Base Operator Prepared by: Clearwater Flying Corporation 2389 Republic Dr. Palm Harbor, Fl. 34683 Confidentiality Statement The information, data, embodied in this business plan are strictly confidential and are supplied on the understanding that they will be held confidentially and not disclosed to third parties without the prior written consent of Clearwater Flying Corporation. 'd II Table of Contents CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT INTRODUCTION ...................................... . 3 BID PROPOSAL ........................................ 4-5.6 .' PROJECTED GROSS INCOME .......................... 7-8-9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................... . 10 BUSINESS DESCRIPTION .............................. . I 1 MANAGEMENT AND OWNERSHIP . . .................... 12-13 UNIQUENESS OF THE SERVICE ........................ 14-15 FIXED BASE OPERATIONS ............................ 16-17 SAFETY ..................... ...................... 18-19 mARKETING .......................................... 20 FLIGHT TRAINING ..................................... 21 MAINTENANCE ...................................... .. 22 i i i INTRODUCTION Clearwater Flying Corporation respectfully summits the following proposal to the City of Clearwater in consideration for the fixed base operations at Clearwater Aar Park. In the past years Clearwater Airpark has been grossly neglected and mismanaged. Our team is eager to develop the airpark into a "First Class" operation. We intend to implement this by reducing the city's financial commitments and increasing positive cash flow from five (5) years to three (3) years, Our proposal is based on the understanding of the city's commitment of a three (3) year airpark development plan. • Year One. Runway Safety Zone Extension ' • Year Two. Terminal Building • Year Thee. Vehicular parking expansion Our proposal includes the development of new hanger facilities as approved by the City, and the State at Clearwater Flying Corporation's exspense. 1 • "40 r BID PROPOSAL r PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: Clearwater Airpark Fixed Base Operator BID TO: Mr. George McKibben Purchasing Manager City Of Clearwater P.O. aox 4748 Clearwater, Fl. 34518 BID FROM: Clearwater Flying Corporation 2389 Republic Dr. Palm Harbor, Fl. 34683 1. The undersigned BLDDER'agrees, if this bid is accepted, to enter into an agreement with the City Of Clearwater, to perform and furnish the Services as specified in the Bidding Documents for the Bid Price and within the Bid Times indicated in this Bid and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the City's prepared Lease Agreement. 2, in submitting this Bid, BIDDER represents, that: a. This Bid will remain subject to acceptance for 90 days after the day of Bid opening b. That the City has the right to reject this Bid C. BIDDER has examined copies of all Bidding Documents d. BIDDER has visited the Airpark and become familiar with the general, local and site conditions C. BUDDER is familiar with federal, state, and local laws and regulations , f. BIDDER has correlated the information known to the BIDDER, information and observations obtained from visits to the Airport, reports and drawings identified in the Bidding Documents and additional examinations, investigations, studies and data g. This Bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or on behalf of an undisclosed person, firm or corporation and is submitted in conformity with an agreement or rules of a group, association, organization or corporation; BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited another Bidder to submit a false or sham Bid; BIDDER has not sought by collusion to obtain for itself an advantage over another BUDDER h. BIDDER has received the following Addenda receipt of which is hereby acknowledged: Date Number 4 rod BID PROPOSAL (cont.) I ..' The undersigned Bidder agrees, if this bid is accepted, to enter into an agreement with the City Of Clearwater for the lease of the f=ixed Base Operation at Clearwater Airpark for the following considerations. 1. Base rental rate of $ 4000.00 per month. 2. Five cents($.05) per gallon of all fuel sales. y_ I. Four and one half percent (4.5 %) of all sales revenues with a floating cap of $80,000.00 per year of total rent. 4. Tenant will pay an additional $2,500 at $600,000.00, $800,000.00, and $1,000,000.00 in gross receipts. ( total of 57,500 at $1,000,000.00) 5. Tenant will maintain and mow all grass portions of property utilized by the airport. 6. Tenant will provide hanger expansion at tenants expense. 7. Tenant will refurbish existing 17134 to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and minor renovations to exterior and interior surfaces of the [ structufe. 8. Five year lease, vAth five, five year lease options. BID PROPOSAL (cont.) 9. Improvements and financial commitment to the Airpark by the tenant will be predicated by : 1. Accomplish the landfill remediation necessary to permit construction on available airport property. 11. Landlord expanding the runway safety zone, installing medium intensity' runway lights and low intensity taxiway lights to improve flight safety. . III. Landlord will construct new FBO terminal and expand vehicle parking as per the intermediate range plan as noted in the Airpark Business Plan. 10. Tenant will have first option on the golf course property once golf course lease has expired for the future expansion of airport activities. H. Complete financial data is held in confidence and will be made available upon request. Clearwater Flying Corporation has financial commitments in excess of 1 million dollars to insure the success of this project. . The contact person for,this bid is, Dr, Gilbert Jannelll 909 South r- t.- flarrition Clearwater, 1q. 34616 813-461-2020 6 PROJECTED GROSS INCOME W'• Source 1997 1998 1999 1000 2001 Fuel sales 5240,000.00 $264,000.00 $290,400.00 $319,440.00 $351.384.00 Enclosed Hangers $74,400.00 $151,192.00 S226,008.00 $250,008.00 $257,508.00 Shade Hangers $62,400.00 564,272.00 564,272.00 $66,200.00 $66,200.00 .'Tie Down (paved) 511,340.00 $13,950.00 $13,950.00 S14,369.00 $14,369.00 Tie Down (grass) $9,000.00 $11,088.00 $11,088.00 S11,421.00 $11,421.00 Maintanence (labor) $76,000.00 S83,600.00 591,960,00 $101,156.00 $111,272.00 Parts Sales 5228,000.00 5250,800.00 $275,880.00 $303,468.00 $333,814.00 Aircraft Rental 537,100,00 $40,810.00 $44,891.00 $49,380.00 $54,318.00 Ground Instruction $30,000.00 $33,000.00 $36,300.00 $39,930.00 $43,923,00 Flight Instruction 560,000.00 566,000.00 $72,600.00 $79,860.00 $87,&46.00 Aviation Supplies 524,000.00 $26,400,00 $29,040.00 $31,944.00 $35,138.00 TOTAL 5852,240.00 51,005,112.00 $1,156,389.00 $1,267,176.00 $1,367,193.00 7 r? ..y?1?l:c(:].?"{?xj/.e.r F.:rtii'i39.'."•`.•... .. ...... . PROJECTED GROSS INCOME (INDEX) 1. Year one based on fuel sales of 10,000 gals per month @a 2.00 per gal average. Years two, three, four, and live based on 10°.'o increase in fuel sales annually, 2. Year one based on current occupancy (full) at current rates of 5220,00 per month, plus an additional 20 new hangers at 5300.00 per month for 8 months. , Year two based on an additional 20 new hangers, (10 at $350.00 and 10 at f 5300.00 per month) for 8 months. Year three reflects an additional 20 new hangers at 5300.00 per month for 8 months, and a 3% rent increase for the 10 original hangers. Year four reflects all enclosed hangers for a full 12 months. Year five based on a 3% rent increase for all hangers. 3. Year one based on current occupancy (full) and the current rate of $130.00 per month. Year two reflects a 3% rent increase (based on the Consumer Price Index). Year three unchanged. Year four reflects a 3% rent increase (based on the Consumer Price Index). Year. five unchanged. 4 & 5. Year one based on current occupancy and current rates, Year two is based on a 20% increase in based tie down aircraft (4 paved & 4 grass) and a 3% rent increase (based on the Consumer Price Index). Year three unchanged, Year four reflects a 3% rent increase (based on the Consumer Price Index), 6. .Year one, two mechanics at a shop rate of 538.00 per hour, average of 20 fours each, per week, working on outside (customer) aircraft and 50 weeks per year. Years two, three, four, and five reflect a 10% increase annually, 7. Self explanatory, years two, three, four, and five reflect a 10% increase annually. 8 'PROJECTED GROSS INCOME (INDEX CONT) 8. Year one based on 4-C152's, 2-C172's, l- PA28, (or equivalents) and 1-Twin at current rates of 540.00, $60.00, S65,00, and $130,00 respectively. Each flying 100 hours per month with the exception of the twin which was figured at 20 hours per month. Years two, three, four, and five reflect a 10% increase annually. 9. Year one based on three flight instructors conducting 500 hours of ground school per year each @ an average of $15.00 per hour. Years two, three, four, and five reflect a 10% increase annually. 10. Year one based on three flight instructors each averaging 1000 hours per year Q an average of $20.00 per hour. Years two, three, four, and five reflect a 10% increase annually. 11. Aviation supplies consist of training materials, aeronautical charts, pilot headsets, etc, Years 'two, three, four, and five reflect a 10% increase annually. Note: The above estimates are based on 20 new hangers per year over a three year period. It is imperative that the operations building and runway improvements be accomplished'to ensure the success of Clearwater Airpark. ®w.Y?y4}.SLf:rf•t"'•r,,ya.s x. -. ... .. .. __,?__,._- r .. .,. .....x.. .. . i i k. f i } 5?5° E Company Name: Contact: Add ress: City Telephone: ' Contact: Address: City: ;- , r Telephone: Contact: Address: . City Telephone: Consultant: Address: ,A City: 3 Telephone: Director of Maintenance: Address: City: Telephone: ?r?M+iilG?c?d?ff?!{aitr'?,i?}??k/a43i<w:R*ae».w.'wvna•••,,• ,••••• ,••.. • ... , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Clearwater Flying Corporation Robin J. Smith 2389 Republic Dr. Palm Harbor, Fl. 34683 813-725-7708 Tim McKenney 2175 Glen Dr. Safety Harbor, Fl. 34695 813-791-8413 Dr. Gilbert Jannelli 909 S. Ft. Harrison Clearwater, Fl. 34616 813-461-2020 Bob Bickerstaffe 1007 E. Druid Clearwater, Fl. 34616 813-4464421 Frank Marsalek 2185 Glen Dr, Safety Harbor, Fl. 34695 813-725-2876 10 BUSINESS DESCRIPTION Clearwater Flying Corporation, is a Clearwater based aviation company. We bring . together. a diverse background of aviation and business experience. Our pilots hold i Airline Transport Pilots Licenses, and Certified Flight Instructors ratings in both airplanes and helicopters. # Our director of maintenance is a certified Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic. He is an Airframe Inspector as well as an FAA Designated Pilot Examiner with over thirty (30) years of general aviation and airline experience. 'e J . z MANAGEMENT AND OWNERSHIP Mr. Tim McKenney brings to our group over ten (10) years and five thousand (5000) hours experience in general aviation. He learned how to fly at Clearwater Airpark in 1986 and is an Airline Transport Pilot, Lear Jet Captain and a Commercial helicopter pilot. He is a flight instructor in single engine and multi-engine aircraft, instrument flying and helicopters. He has managed forporate Flight Departments operating both jet aircraft and helicopters and has flown Air Ambulance jets operating throughout the United States, Canada, Central and South America and the Caribbean. Because of this diverse career he has had the opportunity to visit literally thousands of Fixed Base Operations both large and small. Mr. McKenney will over see the day to day operations at Clearwater Airpark. He will utilize his vast aviation experience and management skills to make sure daily operations run safely, smoothly and efficiently. As a former employee and long time user of Clearwater Airpark he has dome to know most of the tenants on a personal level and has gained great insight on the FBO and it's operations. Mr. McKenney has lived and worked in the Clearwater area all of his life. He attended Safety Harbor Elementary, Safety Harbor Middle, Countryside High, Clearwater Adult High School and St. Petersburg Jr, College. Mr, McKenney owns a home in Safety Harbor were he resides with his wife and two year old daughter. Mr. Robin Smith brings to our group fifteen (15) years experience as a successful lily entrepreneur. He is the founder of three (3) successful family owned businesses. Which include a State Certified Building Contractor, an Inspection Consulting Firm, and a Helicopter Flight Training School. He also has five (5) years experience in general aviation and is a licensed helicopter pilot. Mr. Smith will assist Mr. Mckenney with the operation of the FBO, applying his experience as a businessman and a flight school owner. In addition he will oversee improvements to the FBO and the Airpark were he can utilize his vast knowledge as a certified building contractor., 1 p 12 t i MANAGEMENT AND OWNERSHIP (conc.) Mr. Smith has also been a long time user of Clearwater Airpark and has come to know a number of the tenants personally. Mr. Smith has lived in the Clearwater area for sixteen years and owns a home in Palm Harbor were he lives with his wife and daughter. Dr. Gilbert Jannelli, a Doctor and respected business man in the Clearwater area sense 1950. Dr. Jannelli has been a local resident for the past 45 years, and a practicing eye doctor for 25 years. He has a business and investment portfolio which includes aircraft operations. He brings to our group his, diverse, proven expertise in investment, business, and management skills which are so important in today's competitive business environment. Doctor Jannelli will assist in all major business decisions and will use his skills as a successful businessman and financial planner to help ensure the airpark becomes a self sustaining enterprise and a valuable asset to the community, as well as a profitable endeavor for the FBO and the City of Clearwater. Bob Bickerstaff has been involved in the aviation field for thirty five (35) years. After graduation from Boston University he was employed by Piper Aircraft Inc. After arriving in Clearwater in 1949 he purchased Clearwater Flying Company. In 1952 he began ` managing the Airpark and continued for twenty (20) years thereafter, Mr. Bickerstaffe's many years of experience as airport manager will be valuable during the revitalization of Clearwater Airpark. Bob continues to be active in aviation and business in Clearwater and has an on going, continued interest in the positive activities of the airpark and its role in the tourist and business development of Clearwater. I Frank Marsalek has over thirty (30) years of aviation experience. He is a cerified Airframe & Powerplant mechanic, and has acted as the cheif mechanic for a major tt Airline Company. Frank, also is a FAA Designated Pilot Examiner, and holds Flight f Instructor ratings in both Fixed wing and Rotor aircraft, Mr. Marsalek has lived and worked i ' h the Clearwater area for fifteen (15) years and owns his home in Safety Harbor where he resides with his wife and two sons. , Frank has been a long time user of Clearwater Airpark and has intricate knowledge of the FBO and its operations. 13 UNIQUENESS OF THE SERVICE As professional businessmen and pilots, we recognize the needs of pilots and there passengers, we are positive our team can make Clearwater Airpark a clean, professional self-sustaining enterprise. It is our intention to offer a level of service never before seen at Clearwater Airpark. This will increase the number of based customers as well as transients, there by increasing revenue through additional fuel sales and other services. It is our desire to see Clearwater Airpark reach it's full potential and become the premier general aviation airports in the Tampa Bay area. SERVICES We intend to be a full service FBO that will be able to compete with any FBO in the country, large or small. We will provide all services that are expected by private flyers as well as the corporate traveler. Realizing that our customers are our greatest asset, we intend to increase customer service to a level never before seen at Clearwater Airpark. This will ensure the continued growth of the airpark by gaining a reputation for quality service. To create this level of service,we will implement the following company policies. G j Our employee's will emphasize our commitment to customer service by providing prompt service with a "can do " attitude. • We will maintain the PBO building in a clean, uncluttered condition, providing a place that people will want to return to when there travels bring them to the Clearwater area. We will provide quality, friendly line service. 14 SERVICES (cont.) • lire will provide tug service to assist in parking and to enable u.v to have a customers aircraft rear v for them upon their arrival if they so desire. • We-will have knowledgeable friendly employee's behind the counter at all times to answer any questions or to help solve any problems Airpark customers may have. • We will arrange ground transportation at customers request. We will provide courtesy transportation for flight crews to get lunch or other short errands they may need to make. • We will offer fuel at highly competitive prices. • We will provide high quality aircraft maintenance, using only the most qualified mechanics, at competitive prices • We will offer quality flight instruction by experienced, professional flight instructors who will follow our philosophy that customers are our most important asset. • All of our employee's will present a neat, clean image and will be in our company uniform at all times. In general we intend to maintain the Airpark in a clean well kept condition and to offer quality aeronautical products and services unsurpassed at any F'BO in the country. t 15 FIXED BASE OPERATIONS To ensure the success of the Airpark, Our management team will begin by making necessary repairs to the operations building by complying with the requirements of the "American With Disabilities Act". The geneml,beautification of the exterior portions of the operations building, parking and the landscaped grounds will dramatically improve the appearance of the airpark. We intend to be a full service FBO that will be able to compete with any FBO in the county, large or small. We will provide all the services that are expected by the private flyers as well as the corporate travelers such as fuel, maintenance, flight instruction, aircraft rental, auto rental, ice, coffee, catering, etc. By hiring knowledgeable, courteous, professional employees that will emphasize our commitment to customer service, our fixed Base Operations will soon become the premier facility within the Tampa Bay area and an asset to our community. BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Improvements planned for the operations building include but are not limited to. • Comply wish the Americans With Disabilities Act. • Replace carpet and the throughout the building. • Remodel restroonis with now tile, fixtures and, wallpaper to provide; a clean, modern loop • Paint walls and or replace wallpaper as necessary. 16 BUILDING UNAPROVEMENTS {cont.} • Replace current windows with new up to date energy efficient style windows. + Refinish customer service counter to provide a more modern look and style. • Furnish building with new furniture anti fixtures to provide a comfortable place for customers to rest when waiting far passengers or arriving flights. • Install a television and VCR with a selection of tapes for customers entertainment while wailing for passengers or arriving flights. Provide a weather briefing area with telephones and sufficient flight planning publications and tools so pilots can get up to date weather information. + Clean and beautify the patio area by 'relocating the present aircraft wash rack to the maintenance hanger area. • Provide patio furniture for the patio area so that customers can lounge in the beautiful Clearwater sunshine while waitingfor passengers or arriving flights. + Landscape around the entire area to better promote the facility and to enhance the overall appearance of the FBO. These incidental items will help to enhance the overall appearance of Clearwater Airpark and will help to create new revenue by obtaining a reputation of quality and cleanliness, making Clearwater Airpark a place customers will want to return to again and again. f 17 SAFETY Safety is always our number one priority. To ensure and enhance safety at Clearwater Airpark,we will implement the following safety procedures: .. • We will only employ professional well trainers persons familiar with aircraft and working in an airport environment. • We will hold regular safety meetings to review and implement new safety procedures as necessary. • We will relocate the current aircraft wash rack from the patio area to the maintenance hanger area to minimize potential hazards associated with parking in close proximity to buildings and FBO customers. • IVe will keep the fuel pump area in neat order to prevent the possibility of aircraft from coming in contact with other aircraft and to prevent the possibility of flying debris do to prop blast. • We will provide tug service to move aircraft to and from parking. By doing this, we will minimize the movement of aircraft on the ground, thereby reducing the hazards associated with spinning propellers, prop blast etc. Our employees will keep vigilant watch for unauthorized persons in the airport operations area. All passengers and persons meeting aircraft will be escorted to and from aircraft by an FBO employee or the pilot-in-command of the aircraft. No persons will he permitted on or around the movement areas (taxiways, runways etc.)of'the airport. Except that an FHO employee will police the movement areas before the start of'business each day for contaminates and debris. l8 1 i r i 1 1 m t w t t 1 SAFETY (cant.) • ,Vo based customer (hanger, tiedown or, otherwise) will be permitted to store any combustible materials on the airport premises. • Regular inspections of the airport and its hangers will be made to ensure k compliance of airpark rules and policies, • We will emphasize adherence to traffic patterns and safety procedures to all persons using the airpark i i .i 19 , E' . MARKETING Upon reward of the Clearwater Airpark Lease we will begin vigorously promoting the Airpark and its products and services. By doing so, we will dramatically increase the sale of fuel and other products and services. Listed below are some of the things we plan to do to increase sales and profitability at Clearwater Airpark. • Maintain fuel prices at a highly competitive price to draw fly in customers from surrounding airports. • Advertise in industry magazines and other publications to promote Clearwater Airpark and Clearwater's many attractions. • We plan to offer fuel discounts to base customers. • We plan to offer fuel discounts on weekends to bring in the weekend flyers and vacationers. • We will promote our maintenance facility in major industry publications through out the country. • We will be advertising, our flight training school all over the United States, Europe and Canada. • Advertise our newly remodeled FBO facility and our new management with top quality service. • In addition to the flight instruction currently offered at Clearwater Airpark we plan to offer top quality helicopter instruction which will draw in a new market for Clearwater Airpark • We will continue the Airpark tradition of Spring Open House and Neighbors Day. • We plan to have weekend fly in events such as barbecues and other special events to attract customers throughout the surrounding areas. 20 r r r r 11 Ella ¦ M ¦ 10. .10 1 r i s I4 1 FLIGHT TRAINING Our flight school will be staffed by only experienced Certified Flight Instructors (CFI) that will be well dressed in company uniform at all times. Our flight school will offer only top quality aviation training emphasizing safety and professionalism at all times. Some of the services we plan to offer are listed below. • Flight instruction for recreational, private, commercial, airline transport, instrument, multi-engine, and helicopter ratings. • Ground instruction for all of the ratings listed above. • Aircraft rental with only the most well maintained, best equipped aircraft available. • We will have for purchase all of the supplies and necessary materials for completing the training mentioned above. • Our flight instructors will have a room dedicated to providing quality instruction with few interruptions and little noise from active movement areas. • We will have on staff an FAA Designated Pilot Examiner to administer all pilot flight exams. This will ensure that our students experience no delays in scheduling checkrides as is the case at many flight schools. • We plan to obtain FAA Approval to administer all airman written tests as well. f^1 •?. .?:?I-•{fJ •6 iii. ,:7.': ?LS. ?. '. w f" - • `• is ',; a . .. ?r'. MAINTENANCE Our maintenance facility will offer the best, most competitive aircraft maintenance in the area. Our mechanics are all FAA licensed Airframe & Power Plant and or Airframe Inspectors. Our director of maintenance has over 30 years of general aviation and airline experience and is an airline transport pilot and certified flight instructor. To attract maintenance business we will aggressively market our services in trade magazines throughout the United States and Canada. The following are just some of the things we plan to offer at our maintenance facility. • Major airframe repair for airplanes. • Major airframe repair for helicopters. • Major engine repairs for airplanes. • Major engine repairs for helicopters. • Annual inspections. • One hundred hour inspections. • Avionics repair and installation. • Parts sales. • Pre-purchase inspections. Emergency call out on weekends and holidays. -By gaining a reputation for quality maintenance at reasonable prices we will be able to draw clientele: from the local area as well as distant areas. This will lead to increased fuel sales and profitability. I t* CITY OF CLEARWATER Mmm%L MM AIRPARK BUSINESS PLAN FY 96/97 TO FY 2000/01 CLEARWATER AIRPARK 1000 Hercules Avenue Clearwater, FL 34625 (813)461-5229 VISION 1 MISSION Present Situation Clearwater Airpark is currently operating as a general aviation airport near the approximate geographical center of the City of Clearwater at a elevation of approximately seventy-one feet above mean sea level. The Airpark provides an uncontrolled three thousand foot runway with base operations support, flight line service, aircraft rental, hangar and tie down rental, aircraft maintenance, aircraft charter and flight training. The aeronautical functions described above are leased to a Fixed Base Operator (FBO), who bid on the position and who pays the City a monthly rental tee plus a surcharge of three cents per gallon on aviation fuel sold. Airpark layout and development is .accomplished according to a City, State and FAA approved Master Plan (Master Plan is shown on Short, Intermediate and Long Range Plans). Two major circumstances will effect the business planning process with the first being the termination of the current Fixed Base Operator lease and the second being the ongoing investigation of the closure requirements of the former land fill operations on the Airpark and surrounding properties. A Request for Proposals for a Fixed Base Operator lease agreement is being prepared with proposals expected to be received in June, 19%. 1 The Airpark was constructed on the site of a former landfill operation which was not closed in conformance with the present requirements of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. An investigation on the extent of the landfill and its ramifications to the Airpark is being prepared by the Environmental Division of the Engineering Department. Company The Clearwater Airpark was constructed in the late 194Us as a three-runway grass facility on a one hundred eighty five (185) acre site. In 1970 the Airpark was reduced to a single paved runway system on a sixty-two (62) acre site in order to allow a golf course to be constructed on the western portion of the Airpark property. The present Airpark has an operations building, a maintenance hangar, a ten (10) place enclosed hanger, forty (40) shade hangars, twenty-nine (29) paved tie downs and approximately fifty (50) grass be downs. The Clearwater Airpark can best be described as a general aviation support facility with strength lying in providing quality customer service and support to the approximately one hundred tenants who are based there. Management The management team for the Airpark is in place. The Airpark is supervised by the Engineering Department Staff Liaison and the Clearwater Airport Authority. The Airport 2 r Authority is an advisory board appointed by the City Commission. The Engineering Department Liaison is a member of the Engineering Services Division, appointed by the City Manager, to oversee the operation of the Airpark and the performance of the FBO. The FBO, who leases the Airparkk, is responsible for all aeronautical functions at the Airpark. Products and Services At present the Clearwater Airpark is in a posture of slow but steady improvement. The base operations building, maintenance hangar, shade hangars and fuel farm have all been refurbished within the last four years. A full array of aviation support activities are provided by the Fixed Base Operator for tenants and fly-in customers of the Airpark. A fully equipped and highly qualified maintenance facility provides the necessary backup support for all aircraft operating at the Airpark Improvements are desired for rehabilitation or replacement of the Terminal Building, runway/taxiway lighting, runway extension, additional enclosed hangars, and rehabilitation of the existing enclosed hangar. These and other proposed improvements are described and programmed in the Goals section of the report. Market Environment The marketplace for general aviation support is highly competitive. The two major manufacturer's of general aviation aircraft, Piper and Cessna have reduced their business 3 oQ4_ r- to a limited number of special order aircraft. With the exception of Mooney and Beech, very few new airplanes are available in the general aviation market. Used aircraft are traded and/or sold at premium prices. Parts and repair services are expensive. The costs of owning and operating general aviation aircraft is becoming too high for the average aviation enthusiast. Constant pressure is being placed upon the system to provide low priced parts and service for aging airplanes. Rapid growth for general aviation airports is increasingly difficult. Clearwater Airpark enjoys an excellent location but can expect only modest growth in future years. Pricing and Profitability The FBO is offering aviation services and products at competitive prices. An area aviation retail fuel price survey has been performed and has determined that and an additional two cents per gallon of fuel can be charged at the Clearwater Airpark with this two cents to be retained by the City as additional earnings. This adjustment will be made at the start of the next Fixed Base Operator Lease Agreement. A waiting list is maintained for enclosed hangar space. There is potential for increased profitability with the construction of additional hangars. These additional hangars should attract more aircraft, promote fuel sales and provide additional revenue for the City. The new Fixed Base Operator Lease Agreement will contain provision that the City will retain a fixed percentage of monthly rental income of any new or rehabilitation enclosed hangar construction. 4 Customers Current customers are using the Airpark for aircraft storage and parking, maintenance and fuel supply. They are requesting additional hangar space. There are currently forty customers waiting for enclosed hangars. Twenty-five (25) new hangars are programmed for construction within the next two years The schedule for new hangar construction may be effected by results of the landfill investigation. An alternate plan may be to relocate existing grass and hard stand airplane tie down areas to allow for construction of additional enclosed hangars in areas not affected by the former landfill operation. Distribution Clearwater Airpark, although small, has become a local service center for general aviation support. The maintenance facility provides well qualified repair and service. Prices are high, yet the Service Center is attracting fly-in customers from nearby airports. . " Financial Status The City operation of the Airpark is currently a General Fund expenditure with income from the Fixed Base Operator Lease Agreement. The current Airpark operating expenditure budget is approximately $61,480. Revenues expected from the Mrpark have been ?I 0 \j e.r . estimated from recent lease negotiations with the present FBO and the assumption that 17 new enclosed hangars can be in place in the first quarter of the 96197 fiscal year. The actual return will be dependent on the approval of the new FBO Lease Agreement and the economic activity at the Airpark. The financial goal is for the Airpark to become a fully self supporting fund providing for both maintenance and long range improvements. As additional incoming facilities are constructed, the Airpark should become self sufficient in the future with the potential of making a very slight profit after needed improvements are made annually (see cash flow statement in Financial Plan). The timing of the Airpark to become a self supporting facility is dependent on the amount of funding the City is willing to R grant to the Airpark either from general funding or future Penny for Pinellas funding. The current financial plan contemplates the City will provide for the funding of general planning and maintenance functions to the existing facilities and that general Airpark improvements financed by loans from the City's general funding. These loans are to be repaid by income from the Airpark to the City, One major deterrent to progressive Airpark growth was the 1992 decision to withdraw Infrastructure tax (Pennies for Pinellas) funds from the Airpark. Funding is needed to take advantage of the 50% matching funding available from the Florida Department of Transportation. Reallocation of a portion of the Penny for Pinellas funding will allow the City to take more prompt advantage of the FDOT grant program and to develop the Airpark according to the master plan in a more rapid and progressive manner. Consideration 6 M should be given to designation of Penny for Pinellas funding if the program is renewed by Pinellas County. Vision • That the Airpark become a fully self sustaining enterprise. The Airpark will have all needed facilities to become an active aviation center and economic asset for the City. This will be accomplished by the installation of various improvements which will attract customers and allow the facility to operate in a safe manner. It will have runwayftaxrway lights and forty five (45) enclosed hangars. Thirty seven (37) enclosed hangars will be the standard size for small general aviation aircraft and eight larger size hangars will be for executive aircraft. Ten enclosed hangars exist. The plan calls for the construction of an additional 35 enclosed hangars over the next five years. The Airpark will be converted, with Commission approval, to an enterprise fund and will be able to sustain its own growth in future years. Growth will be moderate, progressive and compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods and industrial areas. Modest, but enhancing, improvements will be made to the terminal, the e^dsting enclosed hangar will be refurbished. Maximum participation in joint State grant funding will be used to off-set development costs. Joint State Grant funding is accomplished according to a Joint Participation Agreement (JPA), wherein the City will provide the funds far each project and will be reimbursed for 50 7 ?v?r percent of the cost upon completion. Each project is accomplished in coordination with FDOT Aviation which has a regional office in Tampa. Mission Statement The AirparWs mission is to provide safe, practical, top. quality aeronautical service to the Airpark's customers and economic enhancement to the general community in as economical and as profitable a manner as possible for the City of Clearwater. In order to achieve the City's Vision, the Clearwater Airpark FBO commits to the following: The Airparks mission is to provide innovative, practical and top quality aeronautical service to tenants and visitors to Clearwater Airpark. The Airpark's first responsibility is to serve its customers well with polite, courteous and responsive attendance to their needs as well as the provision of top quality assistance and aviation products, maintenance, and training. In carrying out the Airpark's day to day business the FBO strives to: 1. Serve customers promptly with respect, courtesy, and concem. 2. Follow the philosophy that customers are the Airpark's most valuable asset. 3. Be considered as a caring, neighbor-conscience, asset to our community. 8 Through a long term commitment to this mission the Airpark will be viewed as a safe, highly professional and community enhancing asset by customers, citizens and neighbors. Goals In order for the Clearwater Airpark to attain its vision in the manner described in the mission statement, the following primary strategic goals need to be achieved: 1. Determine the boundary and extent of the landfill located on airport property in order to obtain environmental permitting for development. Install medium intensity runway lights and low intensity taxiway lights to improve flight safety. k' 3. Accomplish the landfill remedlation necessary to permit construction on available airport property. 4. Construct two standard size enclosed hangars with 17 spaces. 5. Construct one enclosed executive hangar with 8 spaces. 6. Construct one enclosed hangar with 10 spaces. 7. Refurbish the terminal building or construct a new one to facilitate service and present a better image. 8. Refurbish the present enclosed hangar (Hanger A). 9. Build a separate Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) hangar and meeting room. 10. Build a separate Civil Air Patrol (CAP) hangar and classroom. 9 over 11. Develop an updated and revised Airpark Master Plan upon completion of the investigation of the landfill closure options and review of the then current circumstances and City Commission desires for operation of the Airpark. 12. Construct an additional 10 Enclosed Hangars. 13. Construct additional Terminal Parking. 14. Runway Extension on Both Ends of the Runway. The Clearwater Airpark Master Plan, approved by the City Commission in 1989, calls for extensive refurbishment of the Airpark. The Short Range Program (1989-1994) planned for expenditure of $1,219,300 for airfield building and general improvements. See figure 1 and table 1. All 'of the major Short Range items have been accomplished except for runway/taxiway lights, landfill remediation and hangar and parking construction. Landfill remediation and hangar construction are interrelated and are both dependent upon environmental permitting by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The Environmental Division is presently preparing a Contamination and Assessment Plan which must be submitted to the FDEP for approval. Submittal is scheduled for April 96. Anticipating only minor revisions, approval of the Contamination and Assessment Plan by the FDEP is expected in July 19%. Accomplishment of the assessment investigation is expected to take 9 months and a report of findings be submitted to FDEP in April 97. The FDEP is expected to take four months to review the report and make determination of any required 10 containmentlremediation actions, Until this determination is made the construction of buildings, stormwater treatment facilities, or paving is inadvisable in areas which are known to be subject to the former landfill operations. Preliminary investigation using ground penetrating radar imaging has indicated that the open space available for the construction of the majority of the proposed improvements is affected by the discovery of landfill cell locations. Runway/taxiway lights have been approved by the City Commission and are being jointly funded with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Hangar construction south of the present Hangar A location is not anticipated to be involved with the landfill and will be started as soon as bids are received, which barring unforeseen difficulty, should be approved in FY 1995/96. Hangar Design for 17 enclosed hangars is complete and is being scheduled for advertisement for bids in March, 1996. The Intermediate Range Plan (1995-1999) provides for the City's funding $2,447,800 in building area facilities and parking construction (see figure 2 and table 2). These projects are eligible for joint grant funding with FDOT and will be prioritized and programmed as funds are available. The Intermediate Range Plan is oriented toward reconfiguring the Airpark and constructing new facilities to replace the existing ones. 11 ()V e r r NEW HANGARS (2) TAXILANES (3) eC GRASS & PAVED TIE-DOWNS RELOCATED FUEL FARM Extsirl"G HELICOPTER PASS GRAND AY,I O ? D zxMADtTENANCt - MAN"& KUTnNG M an TKAWHAL ra - ' REVENUE LEASE PLOT V \\31 LK OVURF LOW L CRAAWc WAU IN ran ?? TlE-DOtrl?i REVENUE LEASE PI.OT 2w 0 m m m AlRPftT DRIVE Y ui?s F??rrs 1 mo awalcF wt ` SHORT RANGE PLAN CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARII TABLZ 1 SHORT RANGE CAPITAL DdPROVEWZN S PROGRAM (3988 - 1984) Claarnata EmKutive ASrpuk Master Plan Steady 1. AIRY= PAVEMMNP i VISUAL AID= • Conduct W" r Manaeeoneat Study (1-A) • Improve Airfield Draiaw (14) - Investigate Former Landfill Us (1-C) Rwmdl&Um of FormerLandfiif alts (1-D)• - Reconstruct Runway 15-33 and Pms1W TaadwaiI stop Landlftt Sib (14) • seakoat jumWor 1633 (1-!) - Qaalcoet Pera0al Taadwvw ttpom (3-0) - tnetall Two Lighted W kW Socks (1-11)0• Lm*F d Modlurn Iatooft Mm"y Edge 14otin8 . (MML) (1-1) - Install Loan Intensity Taadvvy Lrdp Lisbtbm MM) (1-I) SUBTOTAL 2. BUILDING AREA FACT UMM - Conatauct Nww f';W Farm Fedllty (2-A)'•' - Rehabilitate Tsadlaaa/Apm Near mdatias Maintenaooe "aan=ss (2-2) . Relwatate Tmdlaaaa South of M dodaS FRO Oper%U=4 aw mas (2-Q . RdmWtatefRwnmmbm Abauft Tb-dowas (2-D) • RebebilitateJReoc3xaiaa Aircraft TW-dawns d1'aet of Tutum Rmom Lease Ana (2-E) Rehabilitate Shade Ramp" (2-F) • Rehabilitate T-11ma are (2-0) - ltebebllitete NaintUsaoe NA09 r (28) RabsWiltato LxkUng MO Operatk mm Buikimp (3-1) • Coostsuct New Tasilann Zed of ThnWxgd u ice) Coa?struct New T•Ssgan Rao* of TbxsdmM It (3-11 SUBTOTAL IM Robot Total FAA DOT Project 22da lZlWble S:20- E4ibis coo" Non-EUebir 22M - 1130,000 $27,000 81,600 81,600 60AW 14AW 3l= 3,000 4,000 1,100 460 450 18,400 16,100 900 200 69AW 02,100 3,450 2,460 39AW 35,300 1,860 11910 io,m 9,000 800 too 70,800 83,720 340 3,90 ` 357,400 22116W 17,570 17'm 48,000 - .,. 48,000 1>1,60o 161740 930 930 81,000 73,000 4;060 000 "x000 -- -- 94,000 14,400 14,400 loi,000 •« N,a00 54,000 61,900 21,900 25,800 x0,000 -• •• 60,000 6,000 6,^_ 43,000 38,700 3,160 31160 MAO 746,000 --= 138,340 112M 196po 112.M 4"Am I TABLE I SHORT RANGE CAPITAL DdPROVEmm PROGRAM ' (I9? - Its) A.arrratar EaacuRirs Alrparit !dater Plan /tidy (Coutinv4d) ACCUS & PARMO R.shs estate/Coootr+ost Pairaew fsnoa R 0 atsa (3-A) - Orarlar Zatranes Road A Parking Lot Coasbud Parlor Lot End of Throaboid It SUBTOTAL. C RSVENUS LRASS PLATS • Prepare Sltrs{o) in Ra Lanus Leas Plow (4-A) SUBMAL GRAND TOTAL 4, - - Sol D9120 PAA DOT Project WWWs glldbis Noo-sugibb SOL -220.. fit .- Cot I - Wm 64im Nm S= Em Wa Am ?..?. -ILM 1?+U00 -- -? 1=At7o Plsrw NOW Tbk Stores Ran& Capital lmpramammis Prograw total cart differs aightay ftee tbs p vgn m totd used wbas tbs dnas" aaWyds was accor*iiahaL Thin to *0 to find plan reliaem ats maids datlad taw preparation of Uw tschakai largo-seals Airport Larmt plus of o[ dmwiap prv ided as-ndvad =*VAke in Appeadiu G at this' fit. Because minor erssdso In We program are typiedly Brads as lroplarrraas&U= risers, bsc=m aoDs of too resars m am be caeddered !Sails does the sidnmts hotibMty at sack depends bwvft upon damonstratad acted teaawt mod Est domed. and bamues the noose advantages and dleadvmtsps of tbs vAnulae atilt boil rim„ tbs randusk ss rembed In thb liaaadai iradbittty remain ralld. Unknown: sea mmsw Plu Report. Parspaph MLL •• U Projects 1-1 stid 1-4 ars a" a ab4 " poled toss am be reduced to lane thm $0,000 by tastailtog ualidlsted wind sochL •* Tual Puts sacs wail peaeuauddy be born by the tnei euppUw. Saurm Grefam. tot. O`j? 1 ----I 4-pawm=mmalli • r NEW HANGARS 3 & TAXILANES (3) I. 4c L NEW FIIO or CORPORATE HANGARS (3) NEW APRON & MAINTENANCE HANGAR NEW TAXILANES & TIE-DO" lddkm? GROMC ICAU IN f= 300 4w .? NEW FRO OPS T99MINAL ?? 11 NEW AIRPARK ENTRANCE ROAD Qt PARKING REPLACED \ LT_HANGAR ovtxnoow inic-Dovm NIB F uGm_ F1E?re 2 New Deve;op w INTERMEDIATE RANGE PLAN ,K CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK NEW FHO or HELICOPTER FACILITY FASM rNEW DAY HANGAR L 9 TABLY 3 tNTERMXDlATE RANCZ CAPITAL D4PR0VZkffh Ta PROGRAM (1995 - IM) CUwwator bmutho AUpark U SAW Plan study FAA DOT Project =Wblo 1Wbk Non-VWbls SdAL 22m- 1920 . 92w 1. AD3FMW PAVZUZNT lc VOUAL AD?! - Now ? -- .. -. ?. BUUMINa AREA FACQdT'1ES - Coostrvd New rW Opaxatiam Apron (3-A) 1?oAoo 10,000 8,000 4AC - caostruc3 New rao Opw"ic" Twobw (3-8) 7'A,90o •- -. 373Ai10 - caastrwA Now coma AVNW (S-c} 35,400 34,$x0 1,9m Um - canrrbud now caporaa Raasars (3.p} m,4ao -- 158,300 138,ma - C Now Tumaarr is bmang T6-drama /lea (S-19) 165,0 1491400 9,909 0,#00 - c soft s INaw Aircraft Tb-8ow= A4* ms to Rsa4,pad TURUM (3-P) 101,000 -- -- 101,000 - Caostrsxt N&w Ts?dlaar I.iast al TbmdwW 10 (3-0) 90 000 Li1300 4,900 4AW - Coosuws Nov T-R&Apa Amvc6 sd Pik Nww Tar am" (2-8) 423AW -- 341,500 341,500 - Caodrud Now ad*" radtily (3-I) 251,400 •. -- IST,4m - Caastrad NOW 3[aliaasenanca Ban4.r (t-J) 313„aoo •- -- 313Aoo - co"Umet New Day BAft r (3-1K) 18,000 -- 22 W0 39,180 - Rspia= T-Ransw (3-L) - Mom SU8U''Z'AL ' 3,a3T'm 35+0,160 5"Im 1,"I m L ACCESS ft PARKIN( . CobAmms Item HBO IP&c ity Rand A Nditg Loot ($-A) x0,000 -- -- M,D00 - 2mosad Partin; Lot East of ThrolboW 15 (3-B) ,- 41M 4I?000 SUBTOTAL 1I0A00 -- -- 110AW 4. , RZVV= UtAn PLOTS SUDTOTAL . Naas -. .r GRAND TOTAL Lim H= 1= fau= 0"U m, bbL r?r\ I,r CORPORATE IRANOA"' NEW TAXILANES & TIE-DOWNS CRAFMC SCMA dl 1991 m o Too aoo eoo ULTIMATE CAPABILITY TAXILANE & TIE-DOWNS `-NEW TAXILANE & TIE-DOWNS F40 or HELICOPTER FACILITY FARM NEW BAY HANGAR GRAND AVlL__ L Y NANCAN xOFS TERMNAL 6tAINTENANCE HANGAR \\ APRON L_jjI 1 ?_ J C_?..i mat Ir.w.? 1_ _ r J j w...J ? .? r r.. rJ• I? \ =_'==^_73 ULTIMATE CAPABILITY • TAXILANE & -----r HANGARS ??? rur ]] ?, I "a-Down, 2, AIFAQ'R RT ?..__DRIVR ..., LEGEIIDt , Nd" Owtiopsurt ?s 3w Figure 3 LONG RANGE FLAN ova CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK TAEL& 3 LONG amoz CAPITAL DAPROVEbMNTS PROGR" {w - 2009) Clast+vat:e Exscu#!rs A1r?arlt mula Pisa study ?.. - - 14 18 Dollm FAA DOT Ptojsd Ettsibk EWbis Noa-EUSibts Sm?bl. S? _ _ _Ca?cs 1. AMMI.D FAVEWEn i VISUAL AIDS - O"day X=rsy 1" (I-A) 292.000 172,100 9.60 9,600 - O"day I'v%U Udway Sro4m (1.8) .1¢s.QQQ -.97M -LM .? OD IUSTOTAL 300, 0 2TOA00 15,000 16,000 2. EUILDINO AREA FACUATM3 - Coowmxs Nsr May BMW" (2-A) 19.000 -- 20.600 29.60 - 0"rtq TwdIsaas (3.8) MAM 63AM s jm 6.600 - Coartmcl New TuMma {2.O) 43.000 38.700 2,160 2.160 - CowbW Now AlrulA T'%-doww (2-0) SUBTO'T'AL 181.000 101.7w 35,160 4!,16 S. ACCUS A PARX3XQ - Racoadsm Pm*bg lab (!-A) .?, 9tJDTMAL 22 00 -- -- 22,200 4. AEV1UiVII LEASII K aft GRAM TOTAQ 6QS 3t °? ?t >xo?a: Qr.tr?.ir. Tac. V a The Long Range Plan (2000-2009) provides for the City to invest $503,800 in additional hangars, taxiways, tie-downs and parking. It also provides for resurfacing the runway. See figure 3 and table 3. These projects are eligible for joint grant funding from FDOT. The Long Range Plan provides for increased business activity at Clearwater Airpark. This Long Range Plan is contingent upon the Public Works Department finding an alternate location for existing materials handling/staging operation on the northern triangle of Airpark property shown on the Long Range Plan. The implementation of the original Master Plan and the associated improvements has been delayed due to the discovery of the former landfill operation and the direction of the Florida Department of Environmental Projection to proceed with a landfill investigation and closure study. It is worthy of note that the City Commission of 1989 which. approved the Master Plan also gave guidance to proceed slowly and systematically to upgrade and develop Airpark facilities. Night flying was prohibited and noise abatement stressed. Major increases in aircraft activity and the introduction of large noisy aircraft was discouraged. Market Goals With the construction of the twenty seven enclosed and eight executive hangars, Clearwater Airpark should have an active tenant base of approximately 130 airplanes. 12 0\)e(' Marketing efforts have been expanded to encourage transient use of the Airpark for tourism and to expand our maintenance and service volume. Sates Goals The Clearwater Airpark FBO will continue to keep the price of its petroleum products at a highly competitive level in order to attract the maximum available business for tenants and transients at the Airpark and'to encourage as much fly in business as possible. Since the Airpark is leased to the FBO for aeronautical functions, the principal increase in City revenue will come from the additional two cents per gallon on retail fuel prices, transfer of grass mowing operations to the fixed lease operator and a percentage of the monthly rental rates for additional new and rehabilitated enclosed hangars. The City currently has an annual expenditure of $17,000, for an annual grass mowing contract for the Airpark property. A portion or all of this responsibility is to be transferred to the FOB in the new Lease Agreement. A new Fixed Base Operator Lease Agreement is expected to be approved in July 1996. Financial Goal 13 Clearwater Airpark will continue to be developed as cost effectively as possible with the goal of obtaining maximum revenue to fund maintenance and development while providing good quality products. Objective 1. Maximum use of FDOT Joint Grant Funding. Objective 2. Construction of new hangars and perhaps, use of lease plots to increase revenue, (The use of lease plots may prove to be unfeasible due to the presence of the former land fill operation. These lease plots may be better served for the relocation of grass stand and hard stand airplane tie downs and the construction of enclosed hangars which are not in conflict with the former landfill operation. } Company Overview Legal Business Description Company Name The legal name of the airport is The Clearwater Airpark. Legal Form of Business The legal form of the business is a wholly owned enterprise of the City of Clearwater Florida. Business Location The business location of the Clearwater Airpark is 10DO North Hercules Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 34625. This is the entire location of the business. There are no 14 satellite airports or functions at other locations. Because the Airpark is operating in the general aviation industry it is under the regulation of the Clearwater City Commission, the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation Division and the Federal Aviation Agency. The operation of a general aviation airport is regulated by both Federal and State authorities. The Clearwater Airpark has obtained all required Federal and State permits, licenses and authorizations to operate its facilities. The Airpark pays a registration fee to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for the operation of the fuel farm. The Airpark operating license. is issued annually by the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation Division after an inspection which generally occurs in August of each year. The August 1995 inspection reflected no deficiencies. The Clearwater Airpark has an excellent working relationship with both the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation Division and the Federal Aviation Agency. The local FDOT Aviation section is located in the District 7 office in Tampa. The Airpark receives periodic visits from representatives of FDOT District 7. They are the agency which also provides joint grant funding for Airpark maintenance and improvement projects. FDOT Aviation has been a key supporter of the development of the Airpark Master Plan and the improvements which have been made at the Airpark since 1990. The Federal Aviation Agency flight standards office in Orlando and the suboffice in Clearwater - St. Petersburg 15 International Airport are also supportive of the Airpark operations, providing information and guidance for compliance with federal regulations. Support is also provided in enforcing the flight patterns and minimum attitudes for aircraft operating in the Clearwater air pattern. The Clearwater Airpark is managed by authority delegated from the City Commission. The Airport Authority observes the operation of the Airpark and makes reports and recommendations to the City Commission. The City Manager exercises policy-making authority over the operation of the Airpark and delegates Airpark operation to the Engineering Department Staff Liaison. The Engineering Department Staff Liaison supervises the operation of the Airpark, oversees the performance of the Airpark Fixed Base Operator, supervises the maintenance of Airpark facilities and functions as an administrative and coordinating liaison between the City Commission, City Staff, the Airport Authority, the Airpark and interested Clearwater ' citizens and civic groups. The Engineering Department Staff Liaison applies for state grant funding and insures that the Airpark is operated in accordance with Federal, State and Local regulations and that the Airpark growth and improvement is in accordance with the approved Master Plan. 16 0 OR- C- The City leases the hangars, buildings and tie downs at the Airpark to a Fixed Base Operator TBO) who is responsible for all aviation functions at the Airpark. The FBO, by virtue of the' lease, is required to provide hangar and tie down rental, sale of aviation petroleum products, aircraft rental and repair and maintenance of airplanes. The FBO is also granted the right to provide aircraft sales, flight instruction, flying club activities, aerial surveying, sightseeing, air taxi operations, air freight operations and charter operations. The management team at the Airpark consists of the City Manager, the Engineering Department Staff Liaison, the Fixed Base Operator, and the President of Suncoast Flying Services, the sub-lessee who provides aircraft maintenance and flight instruction. The Airport Authority provides guidance and direction similar to that of a board of directors. The Airport Authority is appointed by the City Commission and functions as an advisory board to the Commission with the requirement of overseeing the operation of the Airpark. The Airport Authority is charged with responsibility to: 1. Insure that the Airpark is operated and maintained in a safe and professional . manner consistent with the needs of the community. 2. Insure that the City Commission and Staff are kept current on all matters pertaining to the AirparWs operation and development. 3. Insure that reasonable rules pertaining to the operation of the Airpark are 17 developed, implemented and enforced. 4. Hold public meetings of the aviation community and the local residents in an effort to resolve matters of mutual interest. 5. Hold monthly Airpark Authority meetings, open to the public, to conduct authority business. Each meeting includes allocated time set aside for public input. These meetings are currently being held at the Commission Chamber in City Hall. 6. Make requests to the City Commission for assistance whether financial, legal or from other City departments, necessary to achieve the above described objectives. 7. Prepare and present to the Commission an annual written report containing its findings and recommendations relating to the Airpark. The FBO conducts aeronautical activities at the Airpark and enforces the provisions of the Airpark leases, rules and regulations and pays the City a monthly Airpark lease fee and a three cent per gallon surcharge on aviation fuel sold. This income amount to the City may be changed will the approval of a new Fixed Base Operator Lease Agreement. Additional income is expected in an increase. of Z cents per gallon of aviation fuel sold, transfer of the responsibility of grass mowing to the FOB, and income from a percentage of rental fees for 18 r (OJer new enclosed hangar construction. It is the responsibility of the FBO to provide service at a fair and reasonable rate on a non-discriminatory basis. The FBA must provide a full time manager of operations at the Airpark. The manager must be qualified and experienced and vested with the full power and authority to act in the name of the FBO with respect to the method, manner and conduct of operations of the fixed base services. The manager must be available at the Airpark during regular business hours. In, the manager's absence, .a duly authorized and adequately trained subordinate must be left in charge and available at the Airpark. The FBO is required to provide a sufficient number of employees to effectively and efficiently serve the needs of the Airpark and its' patrons. The management team at the Clearwater Airpark is presently composed of Mr. Rick Emshoff, President of Clearwater Aircraft Inc., Mr. Chuck Wilbur, President and owner of-Suncoast Flying Services and Mr. Harlan Diefendorf co-owner of Suncoast Flying Services. Suncoast Flying Services subleases maintenance, flight training and aircraft rental from the FBO. This management team may change pending the approval of a new FBO Lease Agreement. The Engineering Environmental Division is managing the former landfill operation closure as mandated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 19 Management Team Mr. Rick Emshoff, President of Clearwater Aircraft, Inc. is an airline transport pilot in multi- engine land aircraft and a commercial pilot in single engine land and sea planes and roto- craft (helicopters). Mr. Emshoff is a flight instructor in single engine, multi-engine and instrument flying. He is also an Advanced Ground School instructor and instrument Ground Instructor. Mr. Emshoff has in excess of fifteen thousand flying hours experience. Mr. Emshoff was formerly a Fixed Based Operator at the Watertown Wisconsin Airport and Tampa International Airport. Mr. Charles (Chuck) Wilbur, President of Suncoast Flying Services has an Associate Degree in Aviation Technology, is a licensed aircraft and equipment mechanic, a licensed aircraft inspector and has over twenty years experience in aircraft repair and maintenance Mr. Wilbur has four years- military aircraft maintenance experience, was General Manager of Suncoast Aviation for twelve years and managed Clearwater Airpark for seven years. Mr. Harlan Diefendorf, Vice President and co-owner of Suncoast Flying Services is a graduate Engineer with a degree in Metallurgical Engineering from Rensselear Polytechnic 20 E3 Institute. Mr. Diefendorf has forty years experience in metal manufacturing and ten years experience in aircraft maintenance. Mr. Diefendorf is a licensed aircraft and power plant (A&P) mechanic. Suncoast'Flying Services employs three A&P mechanics and operates the maintenance hangar at Clearwater Airpark, providing a full range of aircraft repair and maintenance services. Suneoast Flying Services is capable of engine, airframe, sheet metal and avionics repair. It has the qualifications to perform all types of inspections, certifications and air worthiness evaluations. Suncoast Flying Services has a fully equipped maintenance shop that can provide all necessary services to maintain the aircraft based at Clearwater Airpark. Flow of Management Authority The flow of management authority, for the Clearwater Airpark goes from the City Commission to the City Manager to the Airpark Engineering Department Staff Liaison to the Fixed Base Operator with the Clearwater Airport Authority functioning as a advisory board to the City Commission and operating as a supervisory board over operation and maintenance d the Airpark. 21 Product Strategy Current Products The Clearwater Airpark FBO currently offers the following services: I. Base. Operations Services, (a) Flight Counter Service and General Information. (b) Tourist Information (c) Rental Cars 2. Flight Line Service (a) Petroleum Products (b)' Refueling Service. 3. Aircraft Parking 4. Aircraft Maintenance 5. 'Aircraft Rental 6. Aircraft Charter 71 Flight training (a) . Basic Flight Training 22 (b) Multi-Engine Flight Training (c) Instrument Flight Training Future Products 1. Additional hangars constructed by the City and rented through the FBO. 2. Possible lease plots rented by the City to provide additional revenue. These Future products are dependent on the determination and the potential financial costs for the containmentlremediation of the former land fill operation on the Airpark. MARKET ANALYSIS Market Definition The market for which Clearwater Airpark provides its products and services is the general : aviation market in the greater Clearwater area. Clearwater Airpark can attract single and multi-engine propeller driven aircraft up to the size of the Beech King Air or equivalent. Clearwater Airpark can attract aircraft from surrounding airports for the purchase of fuel and maintenance service. Aircraft for storage (based at the Airpark) will be limited to those owned and operated by residents of Clearwater or neighboring areas who can conveniently travel to the Clearwater Airpark to access their aircraft. The FBO estimates that market to be approximately 154 airplanes which is larger than the expected ability of the City to accommodate with full development of the Airpark. Full occupation and use of the currently 23 available property at the Airpark is expected to handle approximately 130 airplanes pending the relocation of the Public Works materials handling/staging area in the northerly triangle of the Long Range Plan. Industry Analysis The market is maintaining a near level profile without significant growth. Although not entirely stagnant, few new aircraft 'are being introduced into the market. Only Mooney, Piper and Beech are manufacturing single engine general aviation aircraft at this time. Other major manufacturers have closed their factories, except for a limited number of special orders, due to the laws surrounding product liability and market conditions. lndustr analysts are saying that, with the proposed changes to law enacted in the fall of 1994, there ' is a possibility that Piper and Cessna will increase the volume of aircraft being manufactured in the future. Given this situation, it is unlikely that Clearwater Airpark will enjoy any significant rapid growth. It is more likely to maintain its present level of approximately 100 aircraft with the potential to go to a level between 125 and 130 aircraft when the new hangars are built. Present airplane occupation is 10 enclosed hangars, 40 shade or T-hangars, 21 paved (hard stand) airplane tie down locations, 20 sod or grass airplane tie down locations and areas for transient grass tie downs. The additional aircraft, which will be relocated to enclosed hangars, will probably be locally owned planes which have been stored at nearby airports in order to obtain enclosed < - 24 00 ef- hangars. There is also the opportunity to acquire a few additional maintenance customers by virtue of the high quality of maintenance service and the high technical qualifications of the maintenance staff at Suncoast Flying Services; the Airpark maintenance sub-lessee. Additional aeronautical service business can be acquired by promoting flight instruction, aircraft rental and aircraft charter. These services, although available, are not currently being vigorously promoted, by the FBO. Although potentially profitable, these activities would produce tittle additional income for the City of Clearwater, except through the three cents per gallon surcharge on fuel safes. Marketing of the Clearwater Airpark by the FOB will be a consideration of award of lease in the new FBO Lease Agreement. Market Segment Key points in defining the market segment for Clearwater Airpark aeronautical services are hangar rental, fuel sales and aircraft storage. Currently, this market is shared by the Fixed Base Operators (FBOs) at Clearwater - St. Petersburg Internationaf Airport, Tampa International Airport, Tampa Bay Executive Airport and Albert Whitted Airport. These airports all provide aeronautical services at competitive rates in an effort to attract business from the surrounding area. Users of aeronautical services at Clearwater Airpark are looking for quality and productivity improvements. Many of the aircraft owners operate their airplanes on a limited budget and 25 seek the lowest cost maintenance, sometimes accepting less thorough service. This has resulted in the need to keep the cost of fuel and the charges for maintenance service at a very competitive rate. This has imposed a hardship on the FBO and Suncoast Flying Services, and has kept their profit margins low. 1. The stability of this market segment is based upon the FBO's ability to keep prices sufficiently low to support the aircraft based at the Airpark. Over the past two years the number of tenants and customers has remained steady. There has been some increase in aircraft activity (takeoffs and landings) as a result of the upturn in the national economy. There has also been some additional activity from foreign pilots coming to Clearwater to log their annual qualification minimums. The major market segments are: 1. General aviation enthusiasts who are predominately private pilots who own airplanes and fly for pleasure. 2. Business people who own airplanes and fly for a combination of business and pleasure. 3. Corporate aircraft owned by local businesses that fly for business purposes. 26 btu: ?.?':f%.. ?r,:., .,•,?'•?.. ,,:ee.?.?,.......,._ ... _ The first segment of the market is generally based on products and services provided at the lowest possible cost. This market segment, some of whom are retired, shop for bargains when available and will fly to nearby airports for lower fuel and maintenance prices. Segment number two does some of its own maintenance, is a little more financially able to pay for the convenience of on field maintenance. They will pay for the more professional yet higher cost services available in the Clearwater Airpark maintenance hangar. Segment number three, corporate aircraft, has more funds available for support. This segment has the resources to pay for top quality parts and maintenance that is provided by the Airpark maintenance hangar. It takes advantage of the low fuel prices available at Clearwater Airpark and, to some extent, uses aircraft rental and charter operations to augment their aircraft fleet. Over the past twelve years, Clearwater Airpark has oriented its service to support general aviation and corporate aircraft based at Clearwater Airpark and the service of fly-in customers and tourists. In the next five to ten years, it is estimated that there will be an increase of approximately twenty-five to thirty additional aircraft based at Clearwater Airpark. A modest increase in 27 aircraft activity (takeoffs and landings), is also projected. This increase depends again on the financial ability of the City to containlremediate the former land fill operations. This increase in aircraft activity will be the result of additional visitors and additional corporate airplanes being used more freely as the national economy improves. Additional revenue can be developed by the City from new hangar construction and lease plot development. Strengths Clearwater Airpark is a well maintained and well operated airport that is conveniently located for residents and businesses in Clearwater. It provides good quality aeronautical services at a moderate price. Clearwater Airpark has the capacity to serve the major business segments in its market area while remaining a grass roots airport. Weaknesses Clearwater Airpark has a limited number of enclosed and shade hangars available. These hangars are all rented and newly arriving aircraft must park outdoors. This weakness is scheduled to be corrected by the future construction of enclose hangars. 28 &e-r ic?i?+.??iii!tti.?.i:s: w:?fi?-'•`r" ?..:,. W r..-.. . Clearwater Airpark has a three thousand foot runway and cannot accept large airplanes or jets larger than the small Cessna Citation. The land available to Clearwater Airpark limits the potential for runway extension to approximately 1000 feet. If extended, a four thousand foot (4000) runway would be safer and could attract more corporate aircraft. It still would not provide the potential for Clearwater Airpark to expand into larger more sophisticated aviation activity such as commercial passenger or cargo operations. The presently proposed runway extensions are 200 feet to the south and 800 feet to the north. The southerly extension can be made without conflict to the former landfill operation, The northerly extension is in conflict with landfill cell locations. The Contamination and Assessment report will determine if specific containmentlremediation can be made for the northerly runway extension. Clearwater Airpark, by its size, configuration and location, is limited to the general aviation and corporate activity that it now supports. Residential neighborhoods have been built in close proximity to the Airpark. These areas limit bight activity and have been able to prevent the use of Clearwater Airpark for night flying. Residential development so close to the Airpark has placed a permanent limitation on the expansion potential of the Airpark as a major flight center or significant profit center. 29 The Airpark land adjacent to the runways was used in the 1950's and 1960's for a City landfill. This has severely restricted the development potential for Airpark land, and significantly limited the capability of the Airpark to comply with the time schedule for development in the Master Plan. The environmental ramifications of the landfill, which exists on the majority of the remaining land available for development, limits the expansion potential of the Airpark and limits the potential of the Airpark to develop additional revenue. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection will determine the extent of containmenttremediation necessary to close the former landfill operation upon review of the City's Contamination and Assessment Report. The allocation of approximately one hundred (100) acres of Airpark land for a golf course to be leased to private enterprise for thirty (30) years has also restricted Airpark development. Opportunities The potential for the Airpark to increase revenue is as follows: 1. Build additional hangars which can be rented by the City through the F80 to increase revenue. 2. Designate lease plots and make them available for long term rental, either after development by the City or leased sufficiently long enough to allow the tenant to develop the property for professional needs. The Master Plan sites two potential lease plots. One is on Hercules Avenue, south of the entrance road near the aircraft parking area. The second is on Hercules Avenue, south of Hangar A. {The use of lease plots 30 60e-r may prove to be unfeasible due to the presence of the former land fill operation. These lease plots may be better served for the relocation of grass stand and hard stand airplane tie downs and the construction of enclosed hangars which are not in conflict with the former landfill operation. ) 3. Obtain a percentage of monthly lease for all new hangar construction. 4. Increase the aviation fuel surcharge to a total of 5 cents per gallon of fuel. 5. Allocation to the Airpark of the Golf Park (ease income, negotiated to an updated rental rate, could produce significant additional revenue. 6. Transfer responsibility of grass mowing to the FBO in the new lease agreement. '1 Customer Profile Clearwater Airpark customers range from retired persons who are aircraft enthusiasts, own airplanes, and fly for pleasure to corporate executives and/or corporations that own aircraft for business purposes. Clearwater Airpark customers range in income from modest to very successful. Most of the pilots at Clearwater Airpark are very supportive of Airpark operations... They.take pride in the Airpark and expect top quality service. Most Airpark customers base their airplanes at the Airpark and purchase fuel and some service from the FBO. 31 Other customers are transients or "f!y-ins" that come to Clearwater for business or vacation. These customers base their airplanes temporarily at the Airpark, rent cars and either do business or stay in the Clearwater area for varying periods of time. A large. number of transient personnel come each spring for the Lakeland Air Show. Overall, Clearwater Airpark customers know what they want and expect top quality service at a reasonable price. Competition Airports in the vicinity of Clearwater that compete in the general aviation market are: Tampa Bay Executive, Peter O' Knight, Albert Whitted, Vandenburg, St. Petersburg- Clearwater International, Tampa International and two small but locally known airports that provide low cost maintenance service to fly-in customers, Wimauma and Manatee. The major strengths of these competing airports are their longer runways, night operations and availability of hangar space. Their rental rates are slightly higher. The two smaller airports, Wimauma and Manatee, have the ability to provide maintenance at lower rates due to their low overhead. They do siphon some of the business that supports the FBO and maintenance activities at Clearwater Airpark, especially in some of the more lucrative areas such as annual inspections, periodic maintenance service and major component repair or replacement. This type of competition makes it difficult to obtain high bids from potential FBO's at Clearwater Airpark. 32 ? C.. \I- The weaknesses of these airports in the Clearwater competitive environment is their physical location. All except Tampa Bay Executive, Albert Whitted and St. Petersburg- Clearwater International are far enough away from Clearwater Airpark to make storing airplanes there comparatively inconvenient. Tampa Bay Executive prices are comparable to Clearwater Airpark. Albert Whitted is relatively higher. St. Petersburg-Clearwater International has competitive prices, more available hangar space and has been able to attract some of the corporate aircraft from Clearwater by providing enclosed hangar space upon request. Some local customers currently storing airplanes in enclosed hangars at St. Petersburg- Clearwater- International who are on the hangar waiting list will probably return to Clearwater Airpark when new hangar construction is complete and hangars become available, due to the more convenient access provided by the AirparWs location near the center of the city. Observations and Conclusions It appears from the above information that Clearwater Airpark has a solid place in the general aviation community in the Clearwater area. It is competitive and can sustain a customer base adequate to support future operations. There is not sufficient customer r. base to support rapid growth and expansion. The business volume of Clearwater Airpark can sustain slow but steady improvement and modest growth. Risk 33 Rapid expansion or excessive capital investment in Clearwater Airpark could place more of a burden on the budget than is justified. The potential for Clearwater Airpark to attract large numbers of locally owned or corporate aircraft to support rapid expansion is limited. If all forty applicants on the enclosed hangar waiting list had hangars available, the total number of aircraft based at the Airpark would be 140. This is not a sufficient number to support large expansions and extensive hangar construction beyond that which is planned. Unless the US economy makes a major upturn, and, unless general aviation manufacturing provides more aircraft at lower prices, the potential for rapid growth at the Airpark will remain limited. MARKETING PLAN The Clearwater AirparWs marketing strategy is to promote the fact that our products and services are better quality, courteously provided, and more moderately priced than our competition. In addition, advertisements in trade journals and Chamber of Commerce publications, as well as flight cards and community awareness cards provided at the counter, serve to call nationwide attention to the services available at the Airpark. The overall marketing plan for Airpark products is based upon the following fundamentals: 1. Flight line service and petroleum products priced among the lowest in the area. 2. Top quality maintenance service provided at moderate prices by highly qualified personnel. . 3: Flight instruction provided by highly qualified instructor pilots at attractively competitive prices. 34 ???(- 4. Aircraft rental provided at reasonable rates. 5. Aircraft sales made from a comparatively large stock of diversified sizes and types of aircraft at reasonable prices. 6. Charter aircraft with well qualified pilots available upon request for reasonable fees. 7. Hangar and tie down rentals provided at competitive prices. 8. Quality service by trained personnel designed to promote return business. Sales Strategy Clearwater Airpark sales and service should be treated as a long term product. As such, the target market segment is locally based aircraft and fly-in customers from the immediate vicinity. Because of general aviation's special market characteristics some of the volume is seasonal in nature, and efforts must be made to attract tourist and fly-in business for holidays and special events. Special attention must be given to attracting return visits from customers on their first fly-in. '. Positioning Clearwater Airpark products and services provided by the, FBO must be seen by the customer as top quality.and worthy of recommendation for use by others. Pricing must be sufficiently competitive to attract business from surrounding airports. A concerted effort must be made by the Airpark staff to welcome existing customers and visitors in a manner 35 and with sufficient hospitality to support the resort and tourism orientation of the Clearwater area. The advantage of a highly qualified maintenance staff can be exploited to attract business from surrounding airports. It can also be used to attract fly-in business from aircraft owners who can vacation while their aircraft is being maintained. Pricing Prices of Airpark products are determined primarily by cost, then modified to the maximum extent possible by competition. It is important to know that prices at Clearwater Airpark are competitive for products and services. Low competitive pricing is essential to the Airpark market profile. Customer Service Airpark customers emphasize that service and support is one of their major concerns. It is incumbent upon the FBO to provide prompt courteous service by trained personnel. The FBO, by virtue of the lease agreement, is responsible for all aeronautical activities at the Airpark. All of these functions must be provided with a high standard of service and give value for fees charged. Complaint Resolution and Adjustment Policy Complaint resolution rests first with the service provider (the FBO) for flight line service, aircraft sales and aircraft storage. Maintenance, flight training and aircraft rental complaints are resolved or adjusted by Suncoast Flying Services. 36 summon Complaints that cannot be resolved at the provider level are then addressed by the Engineering Department Staff Liaison. Appeal is available through the City Manager and, if necessary, the City Commission. Promotion in addition to standard advertising practice, the Clearwater Airpark gains considerable recognitions through: 'l. A very active Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) Chapter. 2. An'active Civil Air Patrol Squadron. 3. The "Young Eagles" program, part of the EAA, which encourages youth participation in aviation. 4. School group tours to educate children about flying. 5. "Discovery Flights" which provide short duration airplane rides at very low prices (currently 'a 30 minute ride for $22.50). 6. Pilot group participation in open houses and Neighbor's Day. Public Relations The Airpark is very aware of the need for good relations with neighbrAng communities and the need for a strong image of being an asset to the community. In order to achieve these goals, the Airpark holds a'Spring Open House and Fall Neighbor Appreciation Day. 37 The Spring open house characteristically includes a cook-out, static displays, aircraft rides and skydivers. Past open houses have been enhanced by Airpark supporters who fly in a number of interesting, vintage aircraft. The flight school provides instructor pilots to take visitors for scenic discovery flights for nominal fees. Skydivers are provided by the FBO to highlight the festivities. Neighbor Appreciation Day is held each fall to promote goodwill among the neighborhoods adjacent to the Airpark. Residents of the neighboring subdivisions are invited to the Airpark for a cook-out, static displays, and free airplane rides donated by the pilots based at the Airpark. The FBO also provides skydivers, when available to highlight the gathering. Neighbor Appreciation Day has done much to enhance goodwill among the neighboring subdivisions. Acquainting neighbors with the Airpark and the way it is operated has done much to reduce complaints about aircraft activity. It has also demonstrated the value of the Airpark to the community as a business asset. Citizen complaints are responded to promptly and in a concerned manner. Complaints are normally related to low flying aircraft or noise. The FBO, the Airpark Authority and the Airpark Engineering Department Staff Liaison work with citizens to insure that the Airpark is operated safely and in a manner that does not impose a nuisance upon the surrounding neighborhoods. 38 FINANCIAL PLAN Assumptions The financial projections contained in this plan are based upon the following assumptions: 1. The Clearwater Airpark will continue to function as a general aviation facility. 2. The City will continue to lease out the Airpark operation to a Fixed Base Operator. 3. Landfill remediation to recover land for additional development will not be cost prohibitive and will be a General Fund expenditure. 4. An environmental permit for the building of additional hangars will be obtainable, upon approved landfill closure or proper landfill containmentlremediation. 5. Florida Department of Transportation Joint Grant funding will continue to be available to provide fifty percent (50%) of Airpark development costs. 6. 'Land will be available for the development of lease plots as indicated in the Master Plan. 7. No additional land will be taken from the Airpark. B. The loan pool interest rate will be 7% for year 1, 7.5% for years 2 & 3 and S% for years 4&5. 9. Variable cost increases will not exceed 2% per year,. 10. The consumer price index will remain on a gradual progression upward, not to exceed 3% per year. 39 11. Hangars constructed in a particular fiscal year will take four months prior to the start of rental income, Background The Clearwater Airpark is currently a City of Clearwater general fund activity, That means that the Airpark's user fees are not sufficient to cover all its annual operating and provide immediate funding for capital improvement expenditures. Funding for capital improvements must be borrowed from the General Fund. The City leases the developed area of the Airpark which supports aeronautical activities to a Fixed Base Operator (FBO). Under the present lease the FBO pays the City $4,050 per month plus $.03 per gallon surcharge on aviation fuel sold or approximately $49,800 per year. This is the only revenue currently generated by the Airpark In return for this revenue, the FBO rents the runway, taxiways, hangars, tie downs, operations building, fuel farm, and maintenance hangar. These fixtures are all of the developed area of the Airpark. The Airpark was leased to the Fixed Base Operator on April 1, 1991 for a five year period until March 31, 1996 with a five year renewal option. The current lease has been determined to be in default by the City Attorney's office, therefore the five year renewal option will not be exercised, A Request for Proposals for a new Fixed Base Operator Lease Agreement is to be issued in May 96. A new Lease Agreement is expected to be reviewed for approval by the City Commission in August, 1996. The income from a new tease agreement is not known at this time. A negotiation of a lease was conducted with the present tease holder prior to the determination of default by the Legal Department of the 40 Q\je- [ present lease agreement. This financial plan is based in part on the dollar figures obtained in this lease renewal negotiation, which include a monthly income of $4,250 for a yearly lease FBO lease income of $51,000 and an increased fuel surcharge of two cents per gallon of aviation fuel for a total of five cents per gallon for a total yearly income of $54,500. This total does not include expected additional income from a percentage of enclosed hanger rentals. The most viable means of increasing the revenue of the Airpark is to develop additional enclosed hangars on existing Airpark property. The first year initial anticipated hangar rental income from the proposed 17 hangars is $27,200. This plan projects the financial impact of constructing four additional buildings containing thirty five (35) enclosed hangars within the next five. years. The proposed improvements are included in the Airpark Master Plan and have been approved by the City Commission, FDOT Aviation and the Federal Aviation Administration. Amount of $708,961 has been reserved in the Capital Budget in budget code 94713 for future Airpark borrowing to finance capital improvement projects. Cash flow Projection A modified cash flow statement (Schedule A) summarizes the impact of constructing proposed improvements at the Airpark. It has been prepared for the five year period beginning with FY 1996197. This statement presents major categories of revenues, receipts and cost expenditures. The schedule shows major maintenance and improvements in each of the five years listed. The cash flow projections shown in Year 1 41 (FY 1996/97) present the projected income from the new FBO lease agreement, rental income from new hangar construction and grant income from the Florida Department of Transportation Airport Grant Program. The hangar rental income to the City will be a percentage of the hangar rental rate charged by the FBO for hanger space monthly rental. The schedule makes the following assumptions: major maintenance of existing Airpark facilities will be the responsibility of the City's General Fund; that the financing of improvements at the Airpark will come from increased revenues in new hangar construction; the State of Florida will continue the 50% matching grant program and the City's financing rate will range from 7 % in FY 96197 to 8% in FY 2000101. The schedule provides for a general maintenance and operational amount in each fiscal year which will be applied to general maintenance activities such as fencing, facility structural repairs, professional services, City internal operational costs, minor improvements, etc. These maintenance activities are in addition to the maintenance activities required by the FBO as part of the Airpark Lease. Major maintenance items are listed in the schedule for the refurbishment of Hangar A (FY 97198); an update to the Airpark Master Plan (FY 97198) and the restriping of runways and taxiways (FY 9912000). Major improvement items are listed in the schedule for construction of 17 new enclosed hangars (FY 96197); installation runway/taxiway lights (FY96197); construction of eight executive hangars (FY 97!98); construction of runway extensions (FY 98!99); construction of 10 new enclosed hangars(FY 98!99) and construction of a new terminal building (FY 9912000); and the construction of additional terminal parking and entryway modification in (FY 2000/01). The debt at the end 42 60 ?? of FY 96197 is $62,381. and rises to $236,418. at the end of FY 2000/01. The debt is fully repaid by FY 02103 provided that no further improvements are implemented in FY 01/02 and 02103. Again, this schedule of improvements is dependent on the income from the new FBO Lease Agreement, and the occupancy of the new hanger additions and the results of the former landfill operation closure. The improvements can be more rapidly constructed if the City uses Penny for Pinellas Funding or funding from the General Fund at a higher level. It is anticipated that in FY 20001/02 and beyond, the Airpark will continue to progress modestly, generating a reserve of funding that can be use to finance additional improvements or reserved for direct payment of improvement costs. The tum over of the operation of the Airpark to an fully self supporting enterprise fund is dependent on the rate as which improvements are constructed, particularly improvements which do not generate a direct income such as hangar rents. In 1970, approximately 100 acres of land was taken from the Airpark and leased to private enterprise for thirty years at a rental rate of $1,000 per year. The land has been developed into an executive-sized golf course. The lease expires in 2001. It is recommended that the golf course be returned to the Airpark either for Airpark development or as a sub-enterprise of the Airpark to augment. Airpark operating revenue, As a sub-enterprise of the Airpark, a more up-to-date rental rate could be negotiated and the rent from the golf course placed in 43 e the Airpark budget to supply additional funds for Airpark operation, maintenance and development. Capital Requirements The total capital required to develop the Airpark over the next five years is $1,850,000. The total City maintenance and operational expenses of the next five years is $650,000. The total investment from the City's general fund over the next five years is $610,000. including the present reserve of $135,000. These figures assume the grant and FBO incomes itemized on Cash Flow Statement, Schedule A. How Funds Will Be Used The runway lights project its a joint participation project with FDOT in an amount not to exceed $100,000. This project installs medium intensity runway lights for the main runway and low intensity taxiway lights for the main taxiway parallel to the runway. Four new hangars building are programmed for construction at the Airpark at an estimated cost of $875,000. Two of the hangars will be a 9 and 8 place buildings on the southerly end of the Airpark. The other two hangars, an 8 space executive hangar and 10 place hangar at. specific locations to be determined. The total project will provide 35 new hangars for the Airpark. These hangars are expected to bring in approximately $88,800 per year additional revenue for the Airpark fund. 44 6Ve r A 9000 foot runway extension has been recommended. Should this project be undertaken, the estimated cost is $325,000. This project is eligible for joint grant funding with FDOT, but should be delayed until the results of the former land closure investigation can be determined. Requests have been made by the Civil Air Patrol and the Experimental Aircraft Association for private hangar space with meeting and training room facilities adjacent. These projects have been discussed in the vision/mission portion of this plan and will be determined by upcoming City Commission review. The proposed improvements for runway/taxiway lights, runway extension and new terminal building will not make a direct income improvement to the Airpark However, these improvements are critical to attracting and keeping new hangar rentals, particularly the new lighting system and the runway extension. ExitWay Back Strategy The financial projections indicate that the increase in revenue generated by new hangar conshictions will permit the Airpark to pay back the principal for the proposed major ' improvements by FY 2007103. Conclusion 45 M Based on the attached financial projections we believe that the Airpark is financially sound. As an Enterprise Fund, it has the potential for modest increases in revenue and can support slow systematic progress as long as joint participation state grant funding is available. The Airpark does not have the income potential to sustain rapid growth and remain financially viable without City fund augmentation. apkbzpMdoc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Vision/Mission The Clearwater Airpark was constructed in the late 1940's as a three-runway grass facility on a 185-acre site. In 3970, the Airpark was reduced to a single paved runway system on a 62-acre site, in its present configuration, to provide for the development of a golf course. Clearwater Airpark is currently operating as a general aviation airport. It is located in the geographical center of the City of Clearwater and provides an uncontrolled 3,000 foot runway with base operations support, flight-line service, aircraft rental, hangar and tie-down rental, aircraft maintenance, aircraft charter and flight training. By FY 2002103, the Airpark will be a self-sustaining enterprise. It will have runway/taxiway lights and 35 enclosed hangars. Twenty seven (27) hangars will be the standard size for small general aviation 46 aircraft and eight (8) will be a larger size for executive aircraft. The Airpark will be converted, with Commission approval, to an enterprise fund and will be able to sustain its own growth in future years. Growth will be moderate, progressive and compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods and industrial areas. Two major circumstances will effect the business planning process with the first being the termination of the current Fixed Base Operator tease and the second being the ongoing investigation of the closure requirements of the former land fill operations on the Airpark and surrounding properties. A Request for Proposals for a Fixed Base Operator lease agreement has been issued with proposals expected to be received in May, 1996, The Airpark was constructed on the site of a former landfill operation which was not closed in conformance with the present requirements of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. An investigation on the extent of the landfill and its ramifications to the Airpark is being prepared by the Environmental Division of the Engineering Department. Company Overview Legal Business Description The legal name of the Airpark is the Clearwater Airpark. The legal form of the business is a wholly owned enterprise of the City of Clearwater, Florida. The business location of the Clearwater Airpark is 1000 N. Hercules Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 34625. This is the entire location of the business. There are no satellite airports or functions at other locations. Management Team The President of Clearwater Aircraft, Inc., Mr. Rick Emshoff, has thirty-eight (38) years experience in general aviation. He is an airline transport pilot in multi-engine land aircraft and a commercial pilot in single engine land and sea planes and roto-craft (helicopters). He is a flight instructor in single-engine, multi-engine and instrument flying. Mr. Emshoff was formerly the Fixed Base Operator (FBO) at Watertown, Wisconsin and Tampa International Airports. Mr. Charles Wilbur, President of Suncoast Flying Services, Inc., has twenty (20) years experience in aviation maintenance. He is a licensed aircraft and equipment mechanic, a licensed aircraft inspector and has an Associate Degree in Aviation Technology. Mr. Harlan Diefendorf, Vice President and co-owner of Suncoast Flying Services, is a graduate engineer in Metallurgical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He has forty (40) years experience in metal manufacturing and ten years experience in aviation and aircraft maintenance. Mr. Diefendorf is a licensed aircraft and power plant mechanic. Outside management support consists of the City of Clearwater Airport Authority and Airpark Engineering Department Staff Liaison, who oversee the operation of the Airpark. cue r- The Engineering Department Staff Liaison is supervised by the Management Team of the City of Clearwater, and the 'City Commission of the City of Clearwater. The FB4 provides the first level of complaint resolution. The Engineering Department Staff Liaison provides the second level and the City of Clearwater Management Team provides the appellate level, if necessary. Product Strategy/Current Products Clearwater Airpark currently offers the following products and services: 1. Base operations services which includes flight counter service, general information, tourist information, and car rental. 2. Flight'line•service which includes petroleum products and refueling. 3. 'Aircraft parking. 4. Aircraft maintenance. 5. Aircraft rental. 6.. Aircraft charter. 7. Flight training. IV r t • Clearwater Airpark's principal products are hangar and tie down rental, flight line service and flight training. Production and Delivery- The key features of Clearwater AirparWs service delivery are the prompt and courteous provision of flight line service and aircraft maintenance as well as flight training by well qualified instructors. Market Anafysis/Market Definition Clearwater Airpark provides products and services to the general aviation market in the greater Clearwater area. This market is composed of single and multi-engine propeller driven aircraft that are either based in the Clearwater area or that fly into the Clearwater area for business and tourism purposes. The FBO estimates that there are approximately 150 general aviation aircraft in the Clearwater area that have the potential of being based at the Clearwater Airpark. Industry Analysis The general aviation market is maintaining a near level profile without significant growth. There are_only a few new airplanes being built each year. General aviation aircraft have become extremely expensive, Most of the trading in aircraft is done with rebuilt or refurbished airplanes. Industry analysts are predicting that, with the changes in product liability law recently enacted by Congress, two.of the major manufacturees, Piper and Cessna will resume building airplanes in larger quantities and increase the availability of general aviation aircraft industry wide. v Je t Customer Profile Clearwater Airpark customers range from retired persons who are aircraft enthusiasts, own airplanes and fly for pleasure to corporate executives and/or corporations that own aircraft for business purposes. Clearwater Airpark customers range in income from modest to very successful. Other customers are transients or"Fly-ins" that come to Clearwater for business or vacation. Marketing Plan The Clearwater's FBO's marketing strategy is to promote the fad that Airpark products and services are better quality, courteously provided and more moderately priced than the competition in the Clearwater area. Sales strategy The Clearwater FBO takes the position that sales and service should be treated as a long term product. As such, the target market segment is locally based aircraft and fly-in customers from the immediate vicinity. Airpark products and services provided by the FBO must be seen by the customer as top quality and worthy of recommendation for use by others. - Pricing must be sufficiently competitive to attract business from surrounding airports. The advantage of a highly qualified maintenance staff can be exploited to attract business from surrounding airports. It can also be used to attract fly-in business from aircraft owners who can vacation while their aircraft is being maintained. Advertising and Promotion vi In addition to advertising in aviation magazines and trade journals the Clearwater Airpark gains considerable recognition through its support of the Experimental Aircraft Association, the Civil Air Patrol, the "Young Eagles" program which encourages youth participation in aviation, school group tours and "discovery flights" which provide short duration airplane rides at very low prices. Public Relations The Airpark is very aware of the need for good relations with neighboring communities and the need for a strong image as an asset to the community. In order to achieve these goals, the Airpark holds a spring "Open House" and fall "Neighbor Appreciation Day" each year. The open house characteristically includes a cook-out, static displays, aircraft rides and usually features skydivers. The Neighbor Appreciation Day, held each fall, is designed to promote goodwill among the neighborhoods adjacent to the Airpark. Residents of the neighboring subdivisions are invited to the Airpark for a cook-out, static displays, and free airplane rides donated by the pilots based at the Airpark. Skydivers are also provided by the FBO as the featured entertainment. Financial Plan The objective at this time is to increase the eaming potential of the Airpark to a sufficient level to permit converting it to an enterprise fund. It is felt that within seven years the Airpark will be in a suitable position for the conversion. The Clearwater Airpark is currently a City of Clearwater general fund activity. That means that the Airpark's user fees are not sufficient to cover all its annual operating costs and provide immediate funding for capital vii 0-e.9 Improvement expenditures. Funding for capital improvements must be borrowed from the General Fund. Capital Requirements According to the opportunities and, requirements for Clearwater Airpark described in this Business Plan, the total capital required to develop the Airpark over the next five years is $1,850,000. The total City maintenance and operational expenses of the next five years is $650,000. The total investment from the City's general fund over the next five years is $610,000. These figures assume the grant and FBO incomes itemized on Cash Flow Statement, Schedule A and the ability to borrow funds from the City general fund for major capital improvements. The current project to install medium intensity runway lights and low intensity taxiway lights will be funded out of the current Airpark capital program. Exlt-Play Back The attached financial projections indicate that the repayment of the construction loans for proposed major improvements will be in FY 2002103. The increase in revenue generated by the new hangars will provide $88,800. per year of additional revenue to the Airpark. The Income from new hangar construction will provide a financial basis for the Airpark to continue to maintain itself and progress slowly and systematically in the out years. viii s r It is recommended that the golf park, which was developed from approximately 100 acres of Airpark land, be reallocated to the Airpark at the expiration of its present lease (2001). The land can be made available to the Airpark for continued development or, can be retained as a golf course, a more up to date rent negotiated and the revenue from the Golf Course put into the Airpark budget in order to support continued Airpark operation and development. Conclusion The Clearwater Airpark is financially sound. It has the potential to develop sufficient revenues to become an enterprise fund and to support continued modest growth and development. It can support new hangar construction and facility development consistent with the Master Plan as long as joint participation state grant funding is available. Additional funding from the City is needed through the five year plan to provide for the proposed improvements. The Airpark is operating as it should. It is aware of the need for good relations with neighboring communities and the need for a strong image of being an asset to the community. It is pursuing those goals as part of its public relations policy. The Airpark, if continued to operate in its present fashion will be able to progress slowly and systematically without creating a nuisance to the neighborhood and without posing any significant danger to the subdivisions in the central Clearwater area. ix 1 a r ' r NN N Q a e a a ? a a?a $ ? was w y O ode 140 f3 N a N ?6 a ?4 fli:t I Jul I -? ? z3rS? ? 7 a ` C l?J• z a s s . $ 8 ?U ? ? s x r O O $$ lip Jill, 11 Him'! RHO g mill ? w A a u cr i C Q Q 0 0 0 a??.r EXECUTIVE Su n m MARY ? aRS? CID CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK 3 D /y! NGINEERING DIVISION City Of Clearwater PoaC Ofnicc I3c::.17-:9 f p?? Cic=;ntcr, norida 3410184748 I 1 MASTER PLAN'STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Prepared for: THE CITY OF CLEARWATER Clearwater, Florida Prepared by: GREINER$ INC. Tampa, Florida Draft Submittal: December 1988 ]. Final Printing: January 1989 1 + t TABLE OF CONTENTS . ? -FOREWORD INTRODUCTION AND KEY ISSUES PROJECT ORGANIZATION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STAGING SHORT _RANGE INTERMEDIATE RANGE LONG RANGE LIST OF FIGURES Elaure Tlt1e I Project Organization 2 Airpark Plan 3 Short-Range Plan 4 Intermediate-Range Plan 5 Long-Range Plan LIST OF TABLES Short Range Capital Improvements Program 2 Intermediate Range Capital Improvements Program 3 Long Range Capital Improvements Program 1 3 5 9 9 12 14 Follows 3 4 8 11 13 Page 9 12 14 0 r FOREWORD The City of Clearwater constructed Clearwater Executive Airpark during the late 1940s as a three runway facility on a 185-acre site. The current single runway-taxiway system, 62-acre site facility was established during 1970 when an agreement entered into by the city resulted in the construction of a golf course directly west of the airpark. The latest State of Florida and Federal Aviation Administration system plans, published during 1986 and 1987, respectively, include the airpark and categorize it as a Basic Utility facility that is needed to serve the area's single engine and small twin engine general aviation aircraft. The rules and regulations currently governing the airpark were established by City of Clearwater officials primarily during the late 1970s. The prohibition of training touch-and-go and nighttime operations are the most significant and unique policies approved frgm an aviation system standpoint. Additionally, the City of Clearwater's latest approved Comprehensive Plan, published during 1983, includes a goal that the city will "provide and maintain a permanent airpark facility which allows fixed- base air transportation service while ensuring safety in facilities and equipment to the aircraft users and operators, and residents of the Clearwater service area.* Despite this, during recent years the short-term nature of city-tenant facilities and management lease agreements have contributed, to existing facilities becoming dilapidated and facilities expansion coming to a halt. These agreements reflect uncertainty concerning the airpark's benefits from an economic, business, and recreational standpoint versus the monetary costs and environmental impacts associated with its operation. However, during December of 1986, the City of Clearwater's Commission voted to retain the airpark. Then, in May of 1987 the Commission voted to enter into a joint participation agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation's Bureau of Aviation to conduct a comprehensive airport master plan study and during December of 1987 Greiner Inc. was authorized to proceed with this study. Many state and local agency representatives, airpark tenants and users, and Clearwater citizens have contributed significantly to this study effort by providing background information, by evaluating alternative airpark improvement plans, and by reviewing the master plan report drafts and take pride in the plan for Clearwater Executive Airpark's future, herein presented. . INTRODUCTION AND KEY ISSUES The primary objective of this study was to document a plan for the development of Clearwater Executive Airpark which is technically sound, environmentally acceptable and financially feasible. The study's scope satisfies the Federal Aviation Administration's requirements, according to their document entitled "Airport Master Plans" (Advisory Circular 150/5070.6A). The study's key issues and basic methodology were as follows: • Inventory existing airpark facilities and their condition by collecting available historical information and conducting an on-site facilities inspection; • Forecast future activity at the airpark by evaluating historical activity levels and assessing its role in the state and federal aviation system plans, ' Outline a facilities requirements program including determining which building, water management and roadway facilities can be rehabilitated and which must be- replaced by determining the capacities and conditions of existing facilities in the context of forecasted activity levels; • Identify an optimum configuration for building facilities, water management and roads by evaluating a series of technically viable alternative layouts and discussing with the diverse group of city representatives and tenants familiar with the potential ramifications of each; Determine the airpark's impact on the surrounding areas by quantitatively evaluating noise and other potential impacts according to Federal Aviation Administration sanctioned methodologies; and s Stage the capital improvements by sequencing them to satisfy the facilities requirements program and in a sequence that is logical from an engineering and construction perspective; j * identify alternative methods of financing the preferred development plan by documenting the eligibility of the capital improvement program } projects for state and federal funding and other funding possibilities. ' J The study's scope did not include evaluating the airpark's impact on the local economy, an in-depth evaluation of existing airpark rules and regulations, or an # analysisW alternate use's of airpark property. 2 PROJECT ORGANIZATION 1 This master plan study's project organization is graphically depicted on Figure 1. The Sponsor Coordinator was responsible for providing the consultant with historical city data relevant to the airpark. The Coordinator also scheduled and attended all committee and public information meetings; and arranged other meeting between the consultant and other city representatives to ensure the master plan project was coordinated with other ongoing city projects, for example the extension of Arcturas Avenue east of the airpark's site, The Master Plan Coordination Committee, comprised of the list of agencies and individuals listed in Appendix A of the Master Plan Study Report, contributed . significantly to the study by providing background information to the. consultant and Sponsor Coordinator, by reviewing preliminary draft master plan report sections, and by providing verbal input during three committee meetings held during January, June, and October of 1988. The Clearwater Executive Airport Authority also made a contribution by providing the consultant and Sponsor Coordinator with background information and feedback concerning the alternative facilities configurations during three of their regularly scheduled meetings. And lastly, public involvement was solicited during three Public Information Sessions held during, February, July, and October of 1988. A list of attendees is provided in Appendix A of the Master Plan Study Report and written comments submitted either during or following the meetings are on file with other study documents. 3 FIGURE I PROJECT ORGANIZATION CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK 0 MASTER PLAN COORDINATION COMMITTEE 0 CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPORT AUTHORITY • PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSIONS CITY OR CLEARWATER SPONSOR REPRESENTATIVE GREINER PROJECT MANAGER no am= DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMS ..._ .....i PLANNING I I i NGINEERING I I ENVIRONMENTAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS During the course of this master plan study, a dynamic interest and enthusiasm for maintaining the City of Clearwater's link with the nation's aviation system was apparent. Residents located adjacent to the airpark, additionally, expressed support for the facility, suggesting that alternative land uses such as an industrial park could be less desirable aesthetically and could generate far more vehicle traffic than the airpark. There, at the same time, continues to be considerable concern regarding the viability of retaining the airpark from a financial standpoint and hazards posed by aircraft activity occurring adjacent to moderate density land uses. To assist the City of Clearwater with the task of charting a future course for airpark, in accordance with the objective, scope, and key issues previously identified, study conclusions and recommendations reached are as follows: * Aviation activity is forecasted to increase from approximately 36,300 operations and 130 based aircraft during 1987 to between 48,400 and 60,600 operations and between 156 and 181 based aircraft by the year 2009, depending on whether or not runway edge lighting is installed. This compared with an operations total at the airpark of approximately 82,400 during 1976. * Most existing airfield, drainage, and building area facilities need to be rehabilitated or replaced. Building area facilities expansion needed to satisfy forecasted demand will need to be located on the former landfill which encompasses an estimated I8 acres of the airpark's 62-acre site. * This master plan study's Airpark Plan, shown on Figure 2, is comprised of the following major features, to be implemented during the next 20 years: 1 r HANGARS ?1 Y•. TIE-DOWNS .` '?r-or?rrW FBO or HELICOPTER FACILITY FUEL FARM HANGARS APRON & MAINTENANCE HANGAR c- FBO OPS TERMINAL. REVENUE LEASE PLOT TIE-DOWNS .y GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 100 0 200 400 d00 OVERFLOW TIE-DOWNS HANGARS REVENUE LEASE PLOT • • r. Figure 2 AIRPARK PLAN &Tlm, hr. CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK A new fixed base operator (FBO) terminal building and adjacent public parking north of the existing FBO terminal building; A second FBO terminal building and parking facility or heliport site (as demand dictates) east of the runway's midpoint; A new fuel farm between the two FBO sites; New T- and shade hangars cast and southeast of Threshold 15; Paved taxilanes to all new T- and shade hangars; A reorganized aircraft tie-down area south of the future FBO terminal building and additional aircraft tie-down positions south of the new T- /shade hangar area to the north; Paved taxilanes to the reorganized and new tic-down areas; A new maintenance hangar located southwest of the existing maintenance facility; Group aircraft bay hangars and corporate single aircraft hangars including associated apron and auto parking adjacent to the FBO terminal buildings and in the vicinity of the future aircraft maintenance hangar; A rehabilitated and extended vehicle access system including a connector road south from Grand Avenue to the future FBO terminal public parking and a northbound public road from Grand Avenue to all future aviation facilities to its north; Expanded and new vehicle parking lots appropriately located adjacent to rehabilitated and new building and aircraft parking/storage facilities to assure aircraft and movement areas are entirely segregated; t = A comprehensive drainage system study to evaluate the existing system's condition/capacity and to develop a master drainage plan for the entire 1 airport site; A rehabilitated and expanded airport site drainage system; A comprehensive former landfill site study to: 1) determine its precise location, depth, and composition; 2) develop a plan for its removal; 3) develop specifications for constructing structures, apron, or auto parking facilities atop the former landfill; and 4) develop a maintenance plan for periodically rehabilitating the existing airfield -- pavement atop the site; Either landfill removal or site preparation for building area facilities construction atop the former landfill depending on the landfill site study findings; Either landfill removal or routine runway overlays atop the former landfill depending on the landfill site study findings; A rehabilitated airfield in the configuration identical to the existing (displaced Threshold 33 for landings, 300 foot overrun north of Threshold 15); Revenue-generating leaseplots adjacent to and west of Hercules Avenue; and Possible installation of medium intensity runway edge lights and low intensity taxiway edge lights. Based on an analysis of four alternative funding scenarios, ranging from receipt of no state and federal funding to receipt of state and federal funding for all eligible funding; and ranging from city management and ownership of airpark facilities versus management and facilities ownership by others, the city could net a positive $50,855 or spend $1,018,228. 6 Ripe= • If the airpark is to retain its existing operating procedures, funding Scenario 1, detailed in the master plan report is recommended. However, to achieve two of the city's major objectives; to maintain maximum control over the physical facilities at the airpark, and to function as an enterprise account, Scenario 4 is recommended. To implement Scenario 4, the following specific actions are recommended: 1 - Establish with federal and state agencies their final, absolute regulations regarding funding eligibility for the airpark and bring operating and policy procedures into compliance; F, 2- Prioritize a five year improvement program; ` 3 - Apply for federal and state aid for eligible items; 4 - 'Structure long-term leases with specific performance standards for the major tenants on the airpark; 5- Set up a rates and charges structure as recommended in the rates and charges study completed during 1984. Such rates and charges should be structured to amortize the capital investment of each facility plus allow for annual maintenance plus set a reserve amount for deferred maintenance and replacement; 6- Either negotiate long-term leases with existing tenants or advertise for competitive bids; 7- Establish a management plan for monitoring and enforcing leases, operation standards' and payment schedules for the airpark; 8 - Establish an account system for the airpark by which management can know the status of performance at all times. 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STAGING I Improvements to airpark facilities must be made in a logical sequence from an engineering and resultant financial advantage standpoint. The useful life and condition of existing facilities also influence when improvements should be made. Therefore, improvements comprising the airpark Plan have, as part of the master plan study, been prioritized as Short, 5-ycar; Intermediate, 5- to 10-year; or Long, 10- to 20-year Range Projects. Within these time frames, the projects are grouped according to their type as follows: Airfield Pavement and Visual Aids; Building Area Facilities; Access and Parking; and Revenue Lease Plots. I SHORT RANGE: Projects to be accomplished by the time activity levels reach between approximately 41,900 and 47,800 annual aircraft landings and takeoffs are shown on Figure 3 and listed in Table 1 along with the cost of completing each improvement. Rehabilitating and/or reorganizing existing facilities, evaluating and preparing sites for facilities expansion, and constructing new facilities arc included in this program. The total cost of the Short-Range Capital Improvements Program is approximately $1,219,300. . E f L?. 8 i e i 1 i 1 7 NEW HANGARS (x) t?\ do TAXILANES (3) ,` yN RELOCATED FUEL FARM EXISTING , \ HELICOPTER I? ' PADS (31 _GRAND AVE_ l? FORMER LANDFILL SITE EXISTING MAINTENANCE .yy HANGAR Gti \ EXISTING FBO 1I 7 OPS TERMINAL I PK t ••- a ? W GRASS & PAVED REVENUE TIE-DOWNS 1 LEASE PLOT EXISTING l HANGARS OVERFLOW GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET T1E.DOwNS \ REVENUE 400 Q 200 400 eon LEASE PLOT AIRPORT DRIVE LEGEND: Figure 3 New Developten[ ® SHORT RANGE PLAN GIell.?tx. CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK i TABLE 1 SHORT RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1939-1994) Clearwater Executive Airpark Master Plan study 1988 - Dollars Total FAA DOT Project Eligible Eligible Non-Eligible Corte Coate g2sts - „Cooks 1. AIRFIELD PAVEMENT do VISUAL AIDS - Conduct Water Managemsnt Study (1-A) $30,000 127,000 $1,500 $1,500 - Improve Airfield Drainage (1-13) 60,000 54,000 3,000 3,000 - Investigate Former Landfill Site (1-C) $,000 81100 450 450 w - Remedlation of Former Landfill Site (1-13)' -- -- -- -- - Reconstruct Runway 15-33 and Parallel Taxiway atop Landfill Site (1-$) 18,000 16,200 o00 o00 - Sealcoat Runway 16-33 (1-F) 69,000 65,100 3,450 3,450 - Sealcoat Parallel Taxiway System (1-0) 39,000 35,100 1,060 1,950 - Install Twa Lighted Wind Socks (1-H)" 10,000 91000 500 500 - Instruct Medium Intensity Runway Edge Lighting (MIRL) (1-1) 70,800 63,720 3,540 3,540 - Install Low Intensity Taxiway Edge Lighting (LM) (14) SIAM 46,440 7.580 21580 SUBTOTAL 357,400 321,680 17,870 17,870 2. BUILDING AREA FACILITIES - Construct New Fuel Farm Yacillty (2-A)•" 48,000 •- _- 48,000 - Rehabilitate Taxllans/Apron Near Existing Maintenance Hangar (2-13) 18,800 16,740 930 930 - Rehabilitate Taxilanes South of Existing FBO Operations Building (2-C) 81,000 72,900 4,460 4,060 - Rehabilitate/Reorganise Aircraft Tie-downs (2-D) 95,000 -- -- 95,000 - Rehabilitate/Reorganise Aircraft Tie-downs West of Future Revenue Lease Area (2-E) 14,400 -- -- 14,400 - Rehabilitate Shade Hangar (2-F) 108,000 -- 54,000 54,000 - Rehabilitate T-Hangan (2-G) 51,600 -- 25,800 26,800 - Rehabilitate Maintenance Hangar (2H) 60,000 60,000 - Rehabilitate Existing ?130 Operations Huildinp (3-I) 6,000 _• ._ 6,000 - Construct New Taxilanes East of Threshold 15 (2-3) 43,D00 38,700 2,150 2,150 - Construct Now T- Hangars East of Threshold 15 (2-K) 2? 0.000 110,000 1)1-0-M .SUBTOTAL 745,600 128,340 196,930 420,330 9 TABLE 1 SHORT RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (109-1904) Clowwatar Exacutlre Airpark Master Plan Study (Continued) 19 TAA " Dollars DOT w? Project Cats, Eligible Costs Eligible Cote , Nan-Eligible Costs 2. ACCESS k PARKING • RehabWtate/Construct Pet4metar Pena it Gat" (3-A) 60,000 $4,040 3,000 2,040 - Overlay Entrance Road h Parkins Lot (3-B) 16,800 - -,. 16,L00 - Construct Parking Lot East of Threshold 15 -- (3-C) 7 RM SUBTOTAL 104,300 34000 3,400 47,300 4. REVENUE LEASE PLOTS - Prepare Sites(s) for Revenue Lease Plots (4-A) ,QQQ - - _12.004 SUBTOTAL. 12,000 » 12,000 GRAND TOTAL 211 504,000 217.1W <47 500ar Pleas. Note: This Short Range Capital Improvements Program total cost differs slightly from the program total used when the financial analysis was accomplished. This is due to final plan refinements made during the preparation of the technical large-scale Airport Layout Plan set of drawings provided aspreduced a:hlbita in Appendix G of this report. Beeause miner chsnVm in this program are typically made as Implementation occurs, because none of the scenarbs cart be considered finite since the ultimate feasibility of each depends heavily upon demonstrated actual tenant and market dommd, and because the relative advantages and disadvantages of the scanarla still hold trite, the concludons reached in this financial feasibility remain vad. • Unknown: See Master Plan Report, Paragraph 10.1.1. If Projects 1-1 and 14 are not accomplished. this project cost can be reduced to less than !6,000 by installing unlighted wind socks. •• Fuel Farm costs will presumably be borne by the fuel supplier. Source: Grains, Inc. 10 r INTERMEDIATE RANGE: Projects to be accomplished by the time aviation activity at Clearwater Executive Airpark totals between 44,700 and 53,100 annual operations not already called for under the Short Range Capital Improvements Program are included in the Intermediate Range Capital Improvements Program. The major focus of this phase of a the plan's implementation is associated with building area facilities. It calls for reorganizing the airpark's main aircraft tie-down area, constructing new and expanded FBO operations building(s), apron areas, and vehicle parking areas; and expanding other aircraft parking facilities. This improvements program, depicted by project location on Figure 4 and listed by individual projects and costs in Table 2, will, according to estimates, cost a total of $2,447,800. 11 NEW HANGARS (3) TAXILANES (3) L a II? \ A L,4 A NEW FBO or CORPORATE HANGARS (3) NEW FBO or HELICOPTER FACILITY NEW APRON do MAINTENANCE HANGAR NEW TAXILANES & TIE-DOWN GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 200 0 204 400 800 LEGEND: Ness Development REPLACED T-HANGAR Figure 4 INTERMEDIATE RANGE PLAN Gtt?ll>er,llx. FUEL FARM NEW BAY HANGAR RAND AYE NEW FBO OPS T RMINAL a NEW AIRPARKt EkNTRANCE ROAD & PARKING ? I r---?J? ?j v S AIRPORT. DRIV. t , OVERFLOW TIE-DOWNS W CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK TABLE 3 INTERMEDIATE RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1495 - 1094) ( Clearwater Executive Airpark Master Plan Study lose o a FAA DOT Project Eligible Eligible Non-Eligible Costs oats C241e Costs 1. AIRFIELD PAVEMENT U VISUAL AIDS - None -- 2. BUILDING AREA FACILITIES - Construct New FBO Operations Apron (2-A) 120,000 - Construct New FBO Operations Terminal (2-B) 275,600 - Construct New Corporate Aprons (2-C) 38,400 - Construct New Corporate Han" (2-D) 272,400 - Construct New Taxilanes in Existing 108,000 6,000 6,000 -- 273,600 34,560 1,920 1,920 -- 158,200 136,200 Tle-down Area (2-E) 166,000 149,400 8,500 8,300 ? - Construct New Aircraft Tie-downs Adjacent to Realigned Tsacilanes (2-F) 101,000 -- -- 101,000 - Construct New Taxilanes East of Threshold 15 (2-G) 48,000 88,300 4,400 4,900 - Construct New T-Hangars Associated With New Taxilanes (2-H) 483,000 -- 241,600 241,600 - Construct New Heliport Facility (2-I) 357,400 267,400 - Conatruct New Maintenance Hangar (24) 313,000 -- -- 515,000 - Construct New Bay Hangar (2-K) 69,000 24,500 24,600 - Replace T-Hangar (2-L) 168.000 78,000 78,000 SUBTOTAL 2,957,800 360,160 606,320 1,451,520 3. ACCESS dt PARKING - Construct New FBO Facility Road do Parking . Lot (3-A) 69,000 69,000 - Expand Parking Lot East of Threshold 16 (3-B) 41.000 - 41M9 SUBTOTAL 110,000 -- -- 110,000 4. REVENUE LEASE PLOTS SUBTOTAL - None _- GRAND TOTAL 24&47 goo 80 160 53220 1.381.340 Source: Grainer, Inc. .?, 12 LUNG RANGE: Projects to be accomplished by the time aviation activity levels reach between 48,400 and 60,600 annual operations, however, only after all of the Short and Intermediate Range Capital Improvements Program have been completed, are included in the Long Range Capital Improvements Program. The focus of this final plan implementation phase is to expand aircraft parking facilities to the maximum number the airpark is capable of and to'construct a new maintenance facility. The project locations depicted in Figure 5 and the project costs listed in Table 3, delineate a final capital improvements programs with an estimated total cost of $503,800. ?i 1 ,? 13 ULTIMATE CAPABILITY TAXILANE & TIE-DOWNS 'ANEW TAXILANE & TIE-DOWNS FRO or HELICOPTER FACILITY FRO or \ CORPORATE NEW TAXILANES & TIE-DOWNS 19*1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 200 0 200 400 ow A LEGEND: //////?!i• New Develop om t `L`am CRAND AVE 1Y HANGAR 30 OAS TERMINAL 11 1 MAINTENANCE HANG R w? L ww0. W ? t E-5 E-E 613LCKbFT_U9,0QPN A* ULTIMATE CAPABILITY '"- TAXILANE & '` ??---------, HANGARS ' ?11,DO PAS W Ti\ rNi ; Z ? C' > a I U3 -4 Figure S LONG RANGE PLAN Glekw.kx NIPW RAV NANC:AR CLEARWATER EXECUTIVE AIRPARK TABLES LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (2000 - 2009) Clearwater Executive Airpark Master Plea Study 88 Dolls 1: AIRFIELD PAVEMENT & VISUAL AIDS - Overlay Runway 15-33 (1-A) Overlay Parallel Taxiway System (1-B) SUBTOTAL 2. BUILDING AREA FACILITIES - Construct New Bay Hangars (2-A) - Overlay Taxilanes (2-B) - Construct New Taxilanes (2-C) - Construct New Aircraft Tie-downs (2-D) SUBTOTAL 3. . ACCESS & PARKING - Raconllgure Parking Lots (3-A) SUBTOTAL 4. REVENUE LEASE PLOTS None GRAND TOTAL Source: Greiner, Ins. FAA DOT Project Eligible Eligible Non-Eligible Costs _ ts ost Costi 192,000 172,800 9,600 9,600 0Qffl 97,200 6,400 00 300,000 270,000 15,000 15,000 59,000 -- 24,500 29,600 70,000 63,000 3,500 3,500 43,000 38,700 2,160 2,150 9.000 9.000 181,000 101,700 35,160 44,160 .222...E -- -- 2.000 22,800 •• _- 22,800 50w 3, 7 60,160 81450 14 I s' F f 1 { Item #37 ? 17,5 } t i 1 n ? Item #: -F V Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date f 1n_7:?.Gj... SUBJECT: Ordinance 6099-96 - Change orders for purchases of $10,000 or more RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Pass on first reading Ordinance 6099-96 amending Section 2.561(7) authorizing the City Manager to approve change orders up to $25,000 ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: • Based upon the passage of a charter referendum, City of Clearwater Charter Section 2.01(d)(4) was changed to increase the limit on purchases that must be awarded by the commission from $10,000 to $25,000. • Considering this change, the Code or Ordinances, Section 2.54(2) was also changed to increased the limit on purchases that must be submitted to the City Commission for approval from those in excess of $10,000 to those in excess of $25,000. • No change was made at that time to the City Manager's limit on approving change orders on purchases in excess of $10,000 (Code of Ordinances 2.51(7)). The current rule only allows the City Manager to approve change orders less than $10,000. • This difference in limits has caused some confusion. For example: • An original purchase order for $22,000 could be approved by the City Manager, however, • A purchase order for $11,000 with a change order for $11,000 would need to be approved by the Commission. • Ordinance 6099-96 will correct this inconsistency. • The results of this change will be that: • Purchase orders, including all change orders, may be approved by the City Manager if the cumulative total does not exceed $25,000. • Purchase orders that have been previously approved by the City Commission may have change orders approved by the City Manager up to $25,000, cumulative. Ravlowed by: Odgi:uttirts Department: Costs: Commission Action: Loaal Finance NIA ? Approved Lit L'?' -4 Total ? Approved wiCandidons PurahaekV User Department: NIA O Denied Ltiak Mgmt. IA Currant Fiscal Yeer ? Continued to: is NIA Fending Source: ACM ? Capital 1"rovermnt: Other Advertised: ? 6paratlnp: Date: f3 Attachments: Other-. i' Paper: Ordinance 6099.96 Submitted by: 0 Nat Required Appropriation Code City Code 2.661(71 Affected Parties: C NotHWd ? None Canfaar 13 Nat Required 0 Printed on reayclad paper Imo, _... ... AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO CHANGE ORDERS FOR PURCHASE OF COMMODITIES, SERVICES, AND PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS; AMENDING SECTION 2.561(7) AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE CONTRACTS NOT TO EXCEED $25,000; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: 3'7 $ectionA. Section 2.561(7) Code of Ordinances is amended to read: Sec. 2.561. Purchases of $10,000.00 or more. * * * * * * * * * * * * (7) Qhange orders. Any change in the contract price, scope of work or time for completion of any project following the award of a contract shall be by a written change order, approved by the city commission and executed with the same formalities as the contract. However, the city manager may approve and execute change orders without city commission approval subject to the following limitations: (a) Contract price increases shall not exceed $25.000.00 , over the most recent commission-approved contract price, in any one change or cumulatively for the same contract. No contract price increase shall be approved unless there are sufficient funds available for such purpose. W Q tv,. Manager.gpp?oyed contracts may not exre$25 00.00 .QumUlatively. inclusive of all change orders. 55ectiop2„ This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: John Carassas, Assistant City Attorney Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Ordinanoe No. 6099-69 I ii ADMINISTRATION as bids on the envelope, together with other information as may be specified in the in. vitation to bid. Bids shall be opened in public on the date and at the time and place stated in the public notices. A tabulation of all bids received shall be made available to the public. (4) Rejection of bids, The city manager may. (a) Reject all bids; or (b) Reject all bids and readvertise for bids, pursuant to the procedure prescribed in this section. (c) Reject all }yids and direct that the project or service in question be per- formed by city forces upon determining that the project or service can be timely performed for an amount less than each of the bids submitted. (5) Award of contmcts. Except as otherwise pro- vided in this division, contracts shall be awarded by the city commission to the lowest responsible vendor. (6) Performance and payment bonds. A perfor- mance bond and a payment bond, or a "con- tract bond" combining the elements of a performance and a payment bond, issued by a surety company licensed to do busi- ness in Florida, may be required before en- tering into a contract, in an amount at least equal to the contract price or such higher amount as may be found reasonably neces. sary to protect the beat interests of the city. If such bond is required, the form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids. (7) Change orders. Any change in the contract price, scope of work or time for completion of any project following the award of a con. tract shall be by a written change order, approved by the city commission and exe- cuted with the same formalities as the con- tract. However, the city manager may ap- prove and execute change orders without city commission approval subject to the fol- lowing limitations: (a) Contract price increases shall not ex- ceed $10,000.00 over the most recent Supp. No. 6 CD2:61 3 `7 62.562 commission-approved contract price, in any one change or cumulatively for the same contract. No contract price in- crease shall be approved unless there are sufficient funds available for such purpose. (b) Contract price decreases may be ap- proved without limitation. (c) The time for completion may not be ex- tended by more than 60 days, in any one change or cumulatively for the same project, beyond the most recent commission-approved contract comple- tion time. (d) No change order shall change the scope of the work unless approved by the city commission. (Ord. No. 5586.94, § 2, 4-21.94) Sec. 2.562. Purchases for less than $10,000.00. Except as otherwise provided in this division, purchases of commodities or services of a value of less than $10,000.00, may be made in the open market, pursuant to the following procedure and without observing the procedure prescribed in sec. tion 2.561: (1) Minimum number of quotations. Open market purchases shall, whenever possible, be based on at least three quotations and shall be awarded to the vendor making the lowest responsible bid. (2) Notice inviting quotations. Quotations shall be solicited either by written request, which may include facsimile transmission or by telephone. (3) Sealed written quotations bids. Sealed written quotations received in response to written solicitations for quotations shall be submitted to the purchasing agent who- shall keep a record of all open market or. ders and bids. (4) Written quotation open ingprocedures. When formal written quotations are requested and received, the quotations shall be opened in public at the time and place designated by the purchasing agent. Se e a`50 C ! a . APPOINTMENT W013KSHEET '39 Revised * additions since worksession FOR COMMISSION MEETING _October 3-1996 APPOINTMENTS Agenda # BOARD: Municipal Code Enforcement Board MEMBERS: 7 TERM: a veers CHAIR: Stephen Swanberg APPOINTED BY. City Commission MEETING DATES: 4th Wed., 3 p.m. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required except Nov. & Dec. to be 2nd Wed. RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater APPTS. NEEDED: 3 SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: Whenever possible, DATE APPTS. TO BE MADE: 1013196 this Board shall include an architect, engineer, businessperson", general contractor, sub-contractor & a realtor THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE. Date of Original Attendance Interest in Nrno Apra-ointment Recorri 1. (Cont. from 915196) Vacant Seat - Faustino Dolores (engineer) resigned 8114196 Person appointed for this seat will complete term to 10131/98 2. Carl Rayborn 1994 Past year - 14 mtgs *YES 1161 Marine St., 34615 present 10 1 absent 4 H: 442-0372 Retired merchant marine completing term to 10/31/96 3. Dennis Henegar 1993 Past year - 14 mtgs YES 314 Venetian Dr., 34615 present 12 1 absent -2 H: 461-9331 O: 442-3158 Residential & Aluminum Contractor current term expires 10/31/96 THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE VACANCIES: *1. David Campbell Retired computer systems analyst 2314 Minneola Rd., 34624 member C-view Task Force * 2. Sheila Cole current member Beautification Committee 252 Dolphin Pt., 34630 would resign off that board if appointed to this 3. Franke Huffman Architect 1565 Elmwood St., 34615 4. Joyce Martin Past member Development Code Adjustment Board 19029 US19N, Bldg#410,34624 Retired Personnel Management Specialist 5. Lois Martin Past member Planning & Zoning Board 1771 Harbor Dr., 34615 Continued I , z. MCEB volunteers continued •6. David Stitt 1147 Sunset Point Rd., 34615 7. Arthur Walsh 2066 Madrid Ct., N., 34623 Zipcodes of current members: 4 at 34615 ( 2 are above) 1 at 34619 1 at 34624 1 vacant t t f Orthopaedic Technician Retired N.Y.C. Fire Dept, past restaurant owner part time w/Pinellas Co. School Board TO: Mayor and Commissioners QOM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk SUBJECT: Municipal Code Enforcement Board COPSES: Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager DATE: October 2, 1996 B CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartmental Correspondence Attached are two additional nominees for the Code Enforcement Board. '.l .3? r . SFr . 10/01/1996 15:17 8135624735 COMMUNITY RESPONSE PAGE 01 -el 1b:41 E;u_E YAvl.CP 114. RMA TCR O13 724 sir TO., 8135624^35 Po? CITY OF CLEARWATER Application for Advisory Boards (mvst be cloarweter ptffidant tam. 1 ,ij x tee- 40V Home Address; 'Ueu Office Address: .f e . Telephone Telephone How LOAD a of the City of Clarwater? ('ad occupation" ???f' ?? Entploysr ? -},.r -4 19stO of Educedons Other work Expwlence: If retired, former oaaupetian Community Tr t°." Fs ,?? r, .4 other interests: Ooard service (cwrent and pest) Board Preference: Additional Comment.: ?rr?r,cr? ,fi?•? ?--, Please ate attached lies for Boards that require Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS RORM Tot City Clerk's Oapertment P.O. Box 4740 Clearwater, FL 34618 FROM BILL ZINZOW PHONE NO. : 799 2931 Oct. 01 1996 02:22PM P1 CITY OF CLEARWATER Applioetitin for Advisory Boards Onust be Clearwater rnai null Name .?,. .4,J.?!L ?G'- - ...... Home Address: Office Address: Telephone _ ZED C? _......,. w telephone ._ - .w How Lonfl a MLIdZ2 of the City of Clearwater? Occupation s`"?J1'? .....? l:rt?ploy9r Field of Iducatlon: Other Work: Exp9rienuo: 11 rotired, former occupation Community Activitas:?!J? 0(her Interests: r.?1 .,.? lr. i t..?'.. 'e ... '- .. . Board Service (ourrent ilnd post) Boaid Preference: -_....r._ ! " C IE IJ Additional Comments: Dalm, Please tree attached ii$t ror Boards that require Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clark's Dupartment P.O. Box 4 7'48 Clearwater, FL 34018 MUNICIPAL CQREENE0BCEMENT E Meeting Date: 4th Wed. except Nov. & Dec. - 2nd Wed, Time: 3:00 P.M. Place: Commission Chambers Members: 7 Term: 3 years Staff Liaison: City Clerk Department Financial Disclosure: Required Purpose: Conduct hearings on the enforcement of city codes including fire, signs, building and zoning Special Qualifications: "whenever possible, this Board shall include an architect, a businessperson, an engineer, a general contractor, a sub-contractor and a realtor". Orig. Expir. Appt. Name/Address Phone Date 1990 Louise C. Riley - Vice-Chair H: 446-8776 10/31/97 1620 Drew St., 34615 Businessperson 1991 Stephen D. Swanberg - Chair H: 725-2669 10/31/97 3121 Bordeaux Ln, 34619 0: 441-9999 Architect 1993 Peg Rogers H: 536-8071 10/31197 1472 Rosetree Ct., 34624 0: 442-7923 Pharmacist & Storeowner • 1993 Dennis Henegar H: 461-9331 10/31/96 314 Venetian Dr., 34615 0: 442-3158 Residential & Aluminum Contractor 1994 Carl Rayborn H: 442-0372 10/31/96 1161 Marine St., 34615 (finish Wyatt's term) Retired merchant marine 1994 Helen Kerwin H: 446-4679 10131198 1173A Granada St., 34615 Retired Dept. Mgr.-Singer Co. Vacant Seat - Faustino Dolores (engineer) - resigned 8114196 Board Attorney: Andy Salzman - tel. 799-2882 Fax 726-0058 Tew Zinober Barnes Zimmet & Unice - P.O. 5124 - 34618 ;I II" . ' S Qt K 159 Revised " addition sinco worksession FOR COMMISSION MEETING Qotabal 3. 100 Mp0_ IHIMENS Agenda # BOARD: Planning and Zoning Board TERM: 4 years APPOINTED BY: City Commission FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: * * MEMBERS: 7 CHAIRPERSON: Jay Keyes MEETING DATES: 1st and 3rd Tuesdays at 2:00 p.m. APPT(S) NEEDED: 1 DATE APPT(S) TO BE MADE: 1013!96 * * members to possess professional or acquired experience or interest in fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture, or growth management (Ord. #6075-96 - 2nd Reading on 1013196 to add words Whenever_ op ssible) THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT- FOR A NEW TERM OR BEPL CEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE. Date of Original Attendance Interest in Name Ap pint nt Record- rgsa2.a_. in gnt 1. Jay Keyes 1993 Past Year =21 mtgs YES 100 Devon Dr., 34630 present 20 / absent 1 current term expires 10131/96 THE NAMES BELOW ARE SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE VACANCIES: 1. Dale Anderson 923 Bruce Ave.,34630 Commercial Real Estate Broker 2, Sue Berfield 1466 Flora Rd., 34615 3. Charles Cashman 1462 Excalibur Dr., 34624 4. Sheila Cole 252 Dolphin Pt., 34630 5, Douglas Hilkert 2227 Habersham, 34624 6. Franke Huffman 1565 Elmwood St., 34615 Legal Assistant, Past Commissioner Sales Manager, Gulfwind Marine past work, 10 years, General Contractor current member Beautification Committee would resign from that if appointed to this Attorney Architect 7. Evelyn Mense Retired, Manager Collection Dept. Equifax 2444 Enterprise Rd., #2322, 34623 past work with NY Telephone Company Continued 1 PZ volunteers Cant. ? a B. William Plouffe 200 Skiff Pt., Apt 2, 34630 t j 9., Curlee Rivers 1341 Fairmont St., 34615 10. Kurt Steinmann 400 Sunburst Ct., 34615 * 11.' David Stitt 1147 Sunset Point Rd., 34615 Zipcodes.of current members:. 3 at 34616 ' 1 at 34619 1 at 34625 2 at 34630 (1 is Mr. Keyes) J. i k; fa Past Economic Dev. Director Past General Manager/Treasurer Teacher Inspector w/Terminix Orthopaedic Technician 2 RESOLUTION NO. 96-54 ? I Q` , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL TO APPROPRIATE AGENCIES OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 163, AND ESTABLISHING AN ALTERNATIVE REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE COORDINATION AND SITING OF PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the 1995 State Legislature passed CSIHB 1797 entitled the School Facility Siting Act which amended Florida Statutes 235, 255, and 163; and 1 WHEREAS, the goals, objectives, and policies identifying the land use categories in which public schools shall be an allowable use is exempt from the limitation on frequency of plan amendments contained in FS 163.3187; and WHEREAS, the attached proposed ordinance permits Public School Facilities as an allowable use within the Residential Estate, Residential Suburban, Residential Low, Residential Urban, Residential Low Medium, Residential Medium, Residential High, Residential/Office Limited, Reside ntial/Offce General, and Institutional land use categories subject to the proposed policies which contain the criteria by which Clearwater will determine whether a proposed public education facility site or expansion of an existing site is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, an alternative review process has also been identified for reviewing the suitability of each proposed public school site to be considered for approval by Clearwater and the Pinellas County School Board; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section J. The City of Clearwater authorizes transmittal to appropriate agen . cies of the initial action on approving amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element. Section 2. That staff be directed to submit this Resolution, the proposed ordinance, and related staff report on amending the Comprehensive Plan to the Department of Community Affairs, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and other appropriate reviewing authorities for such further action as may be deemed appropriate. Section 3. This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. r PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1996. Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Attest: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Assistant City Attorney w 4a 0.. JAMMINZ' OF CLEARWATER BEACH, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, vs. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD, Case No. CU 96-29 Respondent. 1 RIDER O THE CITY COMMISSION THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on September 30, 1996, on Appellant's appeal of the City of Clearwater Planning and Zoning Board's August 20, 1996, , decision denying Appellant's request for conditional use for the sale of alcoholic beverages on change of business ownership. The City Commission hereby overturns the decision of the Clearwater Planning and Zoning Board and approves the conditional use for the sale of alcoholic beverages on change of business ownership, based upon the following: Findings of Fact 1. Jamminz' of Clearwater Beach, Inc. ("Appellant") is owned and operated by Angelo and Antoinetta Rossi, and has heretofore applied for a conditional use permit relating to the transfer of business ownership of the Jamminz' nightclub located at 470 Mandalay Avenue on Clearwater Beach. Appellant previously received the necessary approval from the State of Florida for the transfer of the State liquor license. w 0 2. Appellant has operated the Jamminz' nightclub on behalf of the previous owner and on their own behalf since mid-April 1996, and first appeared before the City of Clearwater Planning and Zoning Board at a public hearing on its conditional use application on July 16, 1996, at which hearing the application was continued. 3. At a public hearing on August 20, 1996, the City of Clearwater Planning and Zoning Board denied the application in large part based on the evidence presented at the hearing by Sergeant Harris of the Clearwater Police Department that there had been violations of the City's public nudity laws both during the previous owner's management and since the Appellant took control. In addition to his personal testimony and opinions, Sergeant Harris provided the Board with a list of public nudity violations that occurred on the premises which was prepared by the Clearwater Police Department. The list of violations presented to the Board is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." The Board found that the proposed transfer could result in continuous violations of ordinances governing public nudity which could further result in an incompatibility between land uses due to the negative effects of public nudity. 4. No one appeared at either of the public hearings before the City of Clearwater Planning and Zoning Board to oppose the subject application. 5. All of the violations occurred during "wet T-shirt contests" promoted by a disc jockey, Todd Clem, a.k.a. "Bubba the Love Sponge." The contract with Mr. Clem has been canceled. Only one of the violations set out in the list provided to the Board allegedly occurred since the Appellant took control of the business. The 2 violation consisted of an observation by an off-duty officer and no citations were issued. 6. At the hearing before the City Commission, the Appellant agreed to all conditions recommended by staff. Conclusion The City Commission hereby overturns the decision of the Clearwater Planning and Zoning Board and, pursuant to Section 36.065(6), approves the conditional use for the sale of alcoholic beverages on change of business ownership, and as conditions of said approval, imposes the following conditions agreed upon by the Appellant at the City Commission meeting on September 30, 1996: a. The Appellant shall obtain the requisite building permit, certificate of occupancy and occupational license within (six) 6 months. b. All site lighting shall be equipped with a 90 degree cutoff mechanism, with the light being directed downward and away from adjoining residential properties and streets rights-of-way prior to issuance of the occupational license. C. The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to consumption on premises with no package sales. d. There will be no outdoor entertainment. e. The Appellant shall obtain all necessary owner's approvals to transfer the occupational and state alcoholic beverage license within sixty (60) days. f. The Appellant shall neither promote nor permit on the premises any live entertainment, competitions, contest, or any other activities that violate the public 3 • t. . nudity ordinance (Section 21.13, Code of Clearwater). In particular, the Appellant shall neither promote nor permit "wet T-shirt contests" on the premises. g. Within ninety (90) days, the Appellant shall implement and thereafter continuously maintain the operation of the facility as 'a restaurant and dance club in a manner in keeping with the style of operation described in the testimony of Cheryl Presd at the September 30, 1996, appeal hearing. ORDERED this day of October, 1996. Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk sAjsldnnerljammInz.ord . 4 f 00 CONOTTIONAL USE REPORT JAMMINZ DANCE 511ACK 470 Mandalay Ave POLICE CALLS FROM JANUARY, 1993 TO June 61 1996 '91 Fightsidisorderly/battery 4 Injured Persons 9 Drunk Persona 8 Drunk Drivers 47 Treapaosin 16 Noise Complaints 32 Assist Citizena 34 Calls for Officer 1 Lewd i Lascivious 1 Reckloso Driver 6 Illegal Parking 4 Hit & Runs 2 sex Aesa.ults 5 Auto Burglaries 20 Traffic Stops 43 Alarm calls 42 Building Checks 36 Direct Patrols 67 Credit Card Frauds 15 Property Cases 16 Suspicious Parson Calls is Aaga;ultn 21 Ordinance Violations a Spacial Detaila 10 Accidents 4 Juvenile Problems 6 Stolen Cars 4 criminal Mischiefs 13 Thefts 2 Domeatic Problems 3 Drug Violation 3 Weapon Violntions 1 Bomb Threat 3 Warrant Arrents 1 Businaac Burglary 6 Suspicioua Vehicles 2 Alcohol violations IN ADDITION TO THE CALLS HEHTIONED ABOVE, oFFYCERS 085ERVED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS AT THIS BUSINESS. April A,. 1994 A Not T--Shirt contest was hold at Jamminz and during the event, officers observed three women expose their breasts. The women were arrested and charged with violating City Ordinance 6.43 daal.ing with prohibited acts in establishments. serving alcoholic beverages. Sao reports 94-V2--041, 94-V2-042 & 94--V2-043. fioyember 11. 19$5 A Net T-Shirt contest field at Jamminz, was hosted by radio celebrity Todd Clem aka Bubb* The Love Sponge. During the contest two woman exposed their breasts and pubic area, attar Todd Clem encouraged theta to do ao. Ono woman was arrested and charged with violating City Ordinance 6.43 dealing with prohibited acts in establishments serving alcoholic beveragea. The other woman disappeared into the crowd and was not charged. Jamminz Manager Anthony Gaudiosi and Todd Clem were warned about future violations. See report 95-V2--295. EXHIBIT A bgroh_2. 14Sd A Wet T--Shirt contest. held •t Jarminz was hostad by Todd Clem aka Bubba The Lo% w Sponge. During ti. contest several. women exposed their breasts with Clem shouting encouragement. Whils one contestant danced with bre&atai exposed Chem asked her to expose her pubic area to the crowd and she complied. in this oa ae one woman was arrested and char ed with violating Ci.Cy Ordinance 6.43 dealing with prohibited acts ?n establiahments serving alcoholic beverages. Charges against Todd Clem and Jamtninz Manager Anthony Galudiisi were referred to the State Attorney for ponsible proseautlon. See report 96-V2-043. XffXQk_-2Qa 1295 A Wet T-Shirt contest held at ? aminz was hoatnL by Todd Clem aka Bufoba, Thai Love Sponge. Prior to the contest Clem announced that he and the management did not approve of conteactantst exposing themselves and those who did, would be disqualified. Several woman •nterad the contest and the wc.and women to ba judged exposed her breasts, And was disqualified. Imme Ntely afterwards the aommn disappeared into the crowd and officer. Could not locate her. -See report supplement Lo business file f746. MAUI ? 7, IS A Wet T--Shirt contest held at J&...ainz was hosted by Todd Clem aka Hubba The Love Sponge. Five woman competed in the contest with cut off t--shirts and the winning contestant exposed one of her breasts. The police report indicates the winnin; contautant's T-Shirt slipped up over her right breast during her dance, and the reporting officer perceived it to be accidental. The officer did not hear Todd Clem sncoura,ge any contestant to expose htrself and no charges were made. See supplement to business file 1746. A ii,.t T--Shirt cotitest held at Jamminz was hosted by Todd Clem aka Bubba The Love Sponge. Three women competed in the contest and at the encouragement of Clem, two of the conte-tants exposed their breasts. The two women were arrested and c•..,,zgeed with violating City Ordinance 6.43 dealin, with prohibited acts in establishments solving alcoholic beverages. Manager Anthony Gaudiox i was also arrested and ohargod with violating City Ordinance 6.43 . Sao report 96-V2--062. Hal I¢ A Het T-shirt contest hold at Jamminz was hosted by - Todd Clem aka Bubba The Love Sponge. six women competed in the contest and at the encouragement of Clem, five of the contestants either exposed their breasts, or pubic area. The violations were observed by to off duty police off.icor and no oi,tations were issued. Sae sL Ion- z to bualnese file 17 6. ACCORDING To TEE CITY CODS OF ORDIN"CER RECTZON 6.43(2)* THE OWNER8, X"AGIRD AND OPERATORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THS ACTIVITIES TARING PLACE AT THEIR BD8INE88. Preliminary Agenda, (Worksession) pa PRELIMINARY AGENDA Clearwater City Commission Worksession - 9:00 A.M. - Monday, September 30, 1996 Clearwater City Commission Meeting - 6:00 P.M. - Thursday, October 3, 1996 Service Awards Convene as Pension Trustees Reconvene as Commission FN FINANCE 1. First Reading Ord. #6099-96 - amending Sec. 2.561(7) authorizing City Manager to approve change orders up to $25,000 2. Agreement with Ernst & Young LLP for auditing services for 5 fiscal years ending 9130196 through 2000, for a total not to exceed $426,000 GAS GAS SYSTEM 1. Purchase of various steel gas materials to: The Avanti Company, Avon Park, FL, est. $27,065.60; ATS Industries, Inc., Safety Harbor, FL, est. $45,763.88; Equipment Control Company, Norcross, GA, est. $12,088.25; Empire Pipe & Supply Company, Tampa, FL, est. $15,795; Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., Pinellas Park, FL, est. $1,845.54; Florida Industrial Products, Tampa, FL, est. $3,133.21; Hughes Supply, Inc., Clearwater, FL, est. $13,815.76; M.T. Deason Company, Birmingham, AL, est. $57,053.89; Stuart Steel Protection Corp., Somerset, NJ, est. $1,638.40; Utilities Supply, Loganville, GA, est. $2,052; for a total est. $180,251.53 2. Contract for installation of polyethylene gas mains on Darlington Road, from US 19 West to Mitchell Blvd., Marine Parkway from US19 West to Madison Rd., & Grand Blvd. from Madison Rd. North to the Pithlachascotee River to Heuer Utility Contractors, Inc., Clearwater, FL, at an est. $337,760 (Pasco County Gas Expansion - Phase IV) HM HUMAN RELATIONS 1. (Cont. from 9119196) Approve recommendations of Technical Review Committee for allocation of $38,000 in additional city social service funds which were approved by the Commission during budget hearings HR HUMAN RESOURCES 1. Contract for long term disability insurance for employees not covered by City's Pension Plan to Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Chattanooga, TN, for the period 1111196- 10/30/97, at an est. $30,984 (Consent) PR PARKS AND RECREATION 1. Confirm co-sponsorship and waiver of City fees for special events: Jazz Holiday, Fun 'n Sun, Fourth of July, Family Holiday Traditions and Parade, Turkey Trot, North Greenwood Street Festival, Martin Luther King Parade, and 3 new events: Saturdays in the City, Memorial Day & Clearwater Pass Bridge Run, at an est. $134,222 ($49,720 cash contributions & $84,502 in- kind); authorize event sponsors to approve vendors (Consent) a! Jazz Holiday funding request 9/30196 2. C.O.##4 for Countryside Recreation Center to Bollenback Builders, inc., for $4,100.53 (Consent) 3. C.O.#s 1, 2 & 3 for Carpenter Field Clubhouse Renovations to Oakhurst Construction Co., Inc., Seminole, FL, for $25,570 (Consent) 4. Approve 6 month trial period (1011196-3131197) of opening 5 recreational complexes including the recreation centers at Clearwater Beach, Ross Norton Park, Martin Luther King, Morningside & Countryside on Sunday afternoons from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m., at an est. $17,945 (Consent) TR TOURISM 1. Citywide Streetlight Banner Program based on recommended locations at a cost not to exceed $20,000 (Consent) EN ENGINEERING 1. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #!6083-96 - Vacating N 25' & S 25' of the W 75' of Saber Drive r-o-w between Lot 20, Blk D, and Lot 1, Blk G, on plat of Countrypark Sub., subject to it being retained as a drainage, utility easement (City, V96-09) 2. Non-Exclusive License Agreement for vehicular parking upon portion of City r-o-w easement for Clearwater Pass Bridge with Lane Clearwater, an Illinois Limited Partnership d/b/a Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort, having primary 5 year term, with initial year license fee of $3,200 payable $800 quarterly in advance, then $3,600 annually thereafter for remaining 4 years, payable $900 quarterly in advance, with option to extend agreement for 4 additional terms of 5 years each, providing for annual fee adjustment of not less than 3% or more than 5% based on annual CPI 3. (Cont. from 9/19196) Approve ranking of prospective Fixed Base Operators to furnish aviation services at Clearwater Airpark 4. Award of Marshall Street WWTP Odor Control & Piping Modifications to Westra Construction Corp., Palmetto, FL, for $1,263,000 5. Contract for test installation of reclaimed water main using horizontal directional drilling on Windward Passage to Kimmins Contracting Corp., Tampa, FL, for $60,360 (Consent) 6. Memorial Causeway Bridge Project Development & Environmental Status - WSO CP CENTRAL PERMITTING 1. Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property (Pinellas County Teachers Credit Union) located at 2571 Drew St., Campus Walk, Lot 2A (Alpaugh, THE & Sitton d/b/a ABS Properties, SV96-16) 2. Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property (Harborview Center) located at 300 Cleveland St., Rompon's and Baskin's Corrected Map of Causeway Business District, Blk 1 & 3-5; Edward Mill's Sub., Lots 3 less street, 4 & 5 (City, SV96-19) CLK CITY CLERK 1. Library Board - 1 appointment 2. Municipal Code Enforcement Board - 3 appointments 3. Planning and Zoning Board - 1 appointment 4. Pinellas Planning Council - Reappoint Commission Seel for term 12/30/96-12130198 9130196 2 CA LEGAL DEPARTMENT Second Reading Ordinances 1. Ord. #6071-96 - Amending Comprehensive Plan including amendments to future land use element as required by F.S.163, related to the Public Education Facility Siting Act 2. Ord. #6075-96 - revising appointment standards for Planning and Zoning & Development Code Adjustment Boards (LDCA96-16) 3. Ord. #6076-96 - Amending Secs. 40.034, 40.043, 40.064, 40.084, 40.104 & 41.053 to allow noncommercial parking as a conditional use in single family residential districts (LDCA96-12) 4. Ord. #6080-96 - Annexation for property located at 1751 Ragland Ave., Clearwater Manor, Lot 73 (Kenneth Schilling 1 Terence A. & Kelli J. Suiters, A96-25) 5. Ord. #6081-96 - RS-8 Zoning for property located at 1751 Ragland Ave., Clearwater Manor, Lot 73 (Kenneth Schilling / Terence A. & Kelll J. Suiters, A96-25) 6. Ord. #6082-96 - Vacating existing 10' drainage & utility easement lying along SE side of Lot 12, Forest Wood Estates (David D. & Kathleen Clausen, V96-11) 7. Ord. #6085-96 - to amend Sec. 33.028 to authorize City Manager to approve vessel slip rent increases up to 10% annually Resolutions 1. • Res. #96-54 - authorizing transmittal to appropriate agencies of a proposed ordinance amending the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Element as required by F,S. 163, and establishing an alternative review process for the coordination and siting of Public School Facilities Agreements, Deeds and Easements 1. Modification of water easement - Sun Watch, Inc. 2. Water main easement - Sec. 16-29-16 (Daniel & Virginia Milton) 3. Ingress, Egress and Utility Easement - Sunset Oaks, Lot 1 (McDonald's) OTHER CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS City Manager Verbal Reports Commission Discussion Items 1. Direction re Departmental Reviews 2. Direction re '/2 hour meetings with Advisory Boards 3. Review of Mail Distribution Policy Other Commission Action Adjourn 9/30/96 3 OK ? _APPOINTMENT WORK. EET FOR COMMISSION MEETING October 3. 1990Agenda # BOARD: Library Board TERM: 4 yearn APPOINTED BY: City Commission FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Not Required RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: None MEMBERS: 11 CHAIRPERSON: Tony Bacon MEETING DATES: 3rd Fri., 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Library Conference Room APPTS. NEEDED: 1 DATE APPTS TO BE MADE: 1013196 THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINT_ ENT_ FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE. Date of Original Attendance Interest in Name Appointment ecorsi rpappointrnent 1. Pamela LeClair 1993 past year = 9 mtgs NO 309 N. Mars Ave., 34615 present S 1 absent 1 work schedule H: 441-8637 0: 446-3151 very busy current term expires 10/31/96 THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE VACANCIES: 1. Lois Martin 1771 Harbor Dr., 34615 Past member Planning & Zoning Board Zipcodes of current members on board: 3 at 34615 (1 is Ms. LeClair) 1 at 34616 4 at 34621 1 at 34624 2 at 34625 1?D 1<0 )< 1;v 0D -,k ?a e5 ?o Cb= 3 AHMORANDUNi TO: Betty Deptula, City Manager . U FROM: Denise A. Wilson, Assistant to City Manager SUBJECT: Commission Mail DATE: September 25, 1996 City staff is currently using the following procedures on Commission Mail. 1. Mail is sent home every Friday. 2. If the week is a non-Commission meeting week, the mail is scheduled to be delivered twice a week. Once would be on the Wednesday, when agenda is sent home and the second would be on Friday. 3. If it is a Commission week, the mail is sent twice. Once would be on Tuesday because of Work Session follow-up and the second would be on Friday. 4. City staff is currently copying Commission mail on Thursday's Commission meeting nights and placing it in front of them on the Bias. 5. City staff has provided mail at the Work Session, if staff felt the Commission would be at City Hall beyond the noon hour. 6. If it is the 5th week of the month, Commission mail is sent only on Friday. If you need additional information, please let me know.