The URL can be used to link to this page

08/15/1996 ~ ,- ... .... , ,/ ~ ~ . I " ! ". ' ,', ;;~~i;::Ft'!',1\li'10!~*\c~iti(;i!:~~f,;i)j;, ~,~\:;;:""''''"~ ,,,,;,,., ,"",' ,. ,.'! ' ? " ' " . ,: ~ ' . .. c '. , '0' . '" . .. ;J. ... 1.':-:: I',;' '. IY,',:. . 1.' .;. >} , ,'0 .0, . ~< ,. ' ~ ,. . .; }:> . ; ".J,' ?:.. :':.'.'." " .'.' '0', "';(!::: :,'. ',' ; '::1, :-,. t ~.' ;\': j~' . ; ~~. i?\'t. i. . ( '.{~' ." ",..' ',~:.~. ' ~'!.~.t,.; _ 1. ~frh:'<;" '::: . :ii.: '. : :." .l:.~~!', ~ ~\", ::. " Agenda: 8-15-96 0' ~'65 . , "., "~/(..';.l~:i~t.7t..I'"Y~Jt.~it~'ijJ{it4~-' . :r'i:l",:&.ui<1'u..~~.............-"'''''''' "-~......~' ...: '1 .' "..'.,,, "-'i:.i..' .'i-: ., "..'. , , . 17" -----....- ~ I. - .. - ~ .~ . . . . I . " ( ..',. n > i/: .:':';".: :.... :~:\,. '\::;":' ::c'::'!~ .;:;:::....\;',';.~;.',~ .~'::;:J::.~.j!,i; :'I;,!~ \:':',0: ~.. dl"~'J" :~..{~):: ':' ';. :' ... I ' City Commission Meeting 8-15-96 . . . , .. . .. "; r "T . ' . " . .~, . " , . f "'. j'. +" .' .... . <'., >,note: 8~12-96 Preliminary (Worksession) Agenda and paperwork ['.. . that wa~" in package initially b~t then not continued onto r", Thursday's agenda is at the back of this agenda pack. L '. 1r~. .' . .f. ' ! , , . < . I '.', .' .'. . +.' . . , . f C"'. : I . ... ~ .' '" I : > "". ~. . ~,' "j' .' , '.~ , ,. .'. '. . . . . . .' J . . . .. . . ..' .1 < ," , . . . <<T.....~.,..'.c .~~, ~ ~.< ....~",F-i? .. ,OOD ~.~~:'.,~. ".< . ," XL .,", \;~'iI~"l!_"--->. "~"'.~......:iJ~'~..':. -....... '..~'.' ~. ~... > ,". '.r ,..I; ~l "'It ~.(r,-'-<J, ~~. .'t. ~~..: t "l'~~~.~ l~;""~~\'''l'~;u'~l''A; '~J;.1A:'l~~~(ro.li'i6~l~....l"~litilfJJ;;VJ(~M\ -t;_-.!..\t-,. '$ ~.L(~~ 'd;"\-:+.H~ i'- -.; T ~,~ "t~ ~~ ~ ~1~t.'~ t~' ~, ~'" >, ~ -'-; t~ /-,;{ '. .. r . L i. . . . ____ . ,~ .. .dL:.....~~~.~;OV'*~:J;.....\->>I{!:t..~;~#,,;b';.t~*{~ . _ ".1'. '~:.tl .!~ ,; I' ~ :' . , r.~ . . , . . . ~. ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING Thursday, August 15, 1996 ~ 6:00 P.M. - Chambers 1 . Invocation 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Service Awards 4. Introductions and Awards . 5. Presentations: . a) Beautification Committee - Annual Report b) The Campaign for the Largo Cultural Center 6. Approval of Minutes ~ Regular Meeting 8/1/96 & Special Meeting 8/1 2/96 (attorney/client) 7. Citizens to be heard ra items not on the Agenda 1. Commissioner Clark. 2. Mayor. 3. None. 4. Police Explorer Post #31 recognized for awards received making them the top explorer Post in the State. Proclamation: Water & Pollution Control Operation Week - 8/12-17/96 5. a) Report received. b) Withdrawn by Cultural Center. Report of Summer, Job Program given. Participants in Summer Youth Employment Program recognized. State of Florida Safety Award of Achievement presented to Gas System & General Services. 6. Approved 8112/96as submitted, 8/1/96 as corrected. Anne Garri~ spoke in opposition to the parking lot at the West end of Memorial Causeway. Suggested parking garage at Pelican Walk be pursued. Tom Sehlhorst complained re a lien on and devaluation of his property. John Doran indicated Jolley Trolley would operate Visitor's Center for $18,000 not $32,000. Requested beach residents sign the petition re reclaimed water. Joe Evich requested additional information re the relocation of water meters. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. Variance(s} to Sign Regulations for property located at 3130 Gulf to Bay Blvd., Sec. 16- 29~16, M&B 24.07 (Emro Markoting Co. / Speedway; Subway, SV96-12) 9. (Cant. from 8/1/96) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6062~96 - to allow car rental uses as a conditional use in the Beach . Commercial District & Resort Commercial 28 District (LDCA 96-1 3) 8/15/96 8. Denied requests for: 62.5 sq.ft. area variance to allow 126.5 sq. ft. of attached signs; variance of 6 attached signs to allow 11; and variance of 5 signs to allow 8 of same type (canopy signs). 9. Approved. Ord. #6062-96 passed 1 st reading. 1 ~ ~. j' : ' . . c .... ijl,ct II' .. l'"., . . ,~.. yo:" ": t ' '." 'q...l'-'~:~~..~. ~'.. . ',' 10. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6063- 96 - Amending Sec. 40.007 to amend and revise the interpretation of and variance from Chapter Section by deleting the reference to net density, by deleting the old and adding new requirements fOl' calculations resulting in a fraction (LDCA 96-15) 11. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6068- 96 - Amending Sees. 35.11 & 42.34 to specify that density calculations for nursing homes shall be computed on the basis of 3 residents equals one unit, and parking for nursing homes shall be required on the b'asis on 1 space per 3 persons residing in the facility (LDCA 96-14) 10. Approved. Ord. #6063-96 passed 1 st , reading. 11. Approved. Ord. #606B-96 passed 1 st reading. Public Hel1ring - Second Reading Ordinances 12. Ord. #5962-96 - LDCA amending Div. 26 of 12. Ord. #5962-96 adopted. Ch. 40, to provide for revised development standards in the Urban Center District (LDCA95-20) , 13. Ord. #5964-9~ - Zoning Amendments for 13. Ord. #5964-96 adopted. Downtown Urban Core districts (296-01) 14. Ord. #6069-96 - Relating to Building and 14. Ord. #6069-96 adopted. Development Regulations; amending Sec. 47.051, to adopt the 1996 edition of The National Electrical Code & 1995 edition of The Standard for the Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (Items #15-21) - Approved as submitted. The following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually. 15. Purchase of a 1997 two-ton truck with dump body from Sun State International, Tampa, FL, for $49,913.47 (GS) 16. Amendment to 2/27/95 lease agreement with Philadelphia Phillies, relating to Jack Russell Stadium, extending minimum term of agreement from 1 2/31/2003 to 12/31/2004 (PR) 17. Amendment to paragraph 9 of original lease agreement (10/28/85) with Howard G. Hamilton re parking requirements (EN) 8/15/96 2 ---.l ~, " v :.:: ~ c'.:~!: ~~,':': ~~:'~~' . . . , . ':~,.: ''''''','i,~.~:;.:/; """'~~:'; 'k.': "~ :;" . '" t ,~I' . '," . 18. Contract for Morton Plant Main Parking Lot, Inter-connector Sanitary Sewer Extension to Kimmins Contracting Corp., Tampa, FL, for $38,015 (EN) 19. Receipt/Referral - Ord. #6075-96 - Amending Sec. 36.033(2)1a) to revise standards for membership on the Planning and Zoning Board; amending Sec. 36.035(2)1a) to revise standards for membership on the Development Code Adjustment Board (LOCA96-1 6) (CP) , 20. Water main & ingress and egress easement - Baskin's Replat, Lot 2 (Morton Plant Life Services, Inc.) (CA) 21. Sidewalk easement - SEy.. Sec. 12-29-15, Pinellas Groves Sub., Lvt 1 (O'Malley & Mills~ (CA) OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT 22. South Fort Harrison Zoning Study Report (CP) 22. Report received. Staff directed to bring back recommendations to implement. 23. Plan presented. Continued to 9/19/96. ,24. Referred ttl Parks and Recreation Board. 23. Marina Business Plan (MR) 24. Res. #96-52 - naming city property located 'at 1551 Gulf Boulevard as "Pelican Bay Park" (PR) 25. Extend contract for health insurance with Prudential Health Care System of Tampa Bay, Tampa, FL, under fully insured funding arrangement for the period 1/1/97-12/31/97, at an est. $3,569,279.20 and to offer a three-tier medical option effective 1/1/97 (HR) 26. Commission Policies (CLK) 27. Development Code Adjustment Board - 1 appointment (CLK) 28. Other Pending Matters 25. Approved. 26. Approved. 27. Appointed Ron Stuart. 28. None. " CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS 29. First Reading Ordinances a) Ord. #6074-96 - Amending Art. 1 of Ch. 28, to create Sec. 28.11 to prohibit a person from using skateboards, roller skates, in-line skates, coasters and other similar devices in specified locations 30. Resolutions a) Res. #96-47 - Abatement Lien - 630 Drew St., Jones' Sub. of Nicholson's, Blk 7, Lots 1-3 and part of vacant alley (Schoeller / Daniel) 31. Other City Attorney Items a) Ord. #6074-96 passed 1 st reading as amended. a) Withdrawn. 31. Approved encroachment agreement with AmSouth. 8/15/96 3 . . .... ____.~_........_...,' ." ...,.,.,h.~ '.'" .-. .t~Jt''''''''' . "'~'- :r--"'---:-:-":"'.~~"":'~~_"--- .....,---- -..... _.- n........... _ ~.._ _ I ~ , ' .. .\ ...,.. ... I \ ~, . : ,r.. ;.".:~' /~..', :,., I;,....~ " : ". \.'~ , I ,." " 'I' ',' '"+ l "'I, :> 32. City Manager Verbal Reports City Manager distributed report re RFPs' status. Will be updated periodically. City Manager reported County Administrator indicated he did not foresee County opposition to a eRA on the beach. Discussion re proposed reconstitution of DDB. City Attorney to check state statute re condemnation powers. Engineering Oirector reported FOOT is willing to postpone Memorial Causeway Bridge repairs but would like a letter that City agrees. Consensus to agree with understanding no work will take place during tourist season. 33. Commission Discussion Items a) ODa contribution to the CRA - Deputy City Manager exploring possible sublease of CRA office. Unfavorable reaction to possibility of pursuing change in legislation reported. 34. Other Commission Action Sa.aJ congratulated Dunedin for receipt of Claude Pepper Award. She requested discussion be initiated with School Board and other cities re mutual skateboard facility. Hooper requested status of redevelopment of old Morrison site on Cleveland. He requested information re the possibility of a parking garage at Pelican Walk. .cJ.ark. questioned rat'onale of Carol Marchner's, of FLC, statement that they would oppose legislation to exempt DDB from T(F payment. City Cferk explained this was due to impact on other cities. City Attorney reported she had contacted an attorney for FLC and while FLC board would have to decide final position, it was likely they would not favor such a bill. .cIW requested staff look into placing an American Flag on Clearwater Pass Bridge. Regarding the skateboard issue, he felt a park is simplistic and questioned the ability to get insurance for one. He stated you can not legislate common decency and that is what the ordinance tries to do. 35. Adjournment ~ 10:28 p.m. I 8/15/96 4 .. .. .' , , , ' ", ".:. . , 'i"" " :.. ~.. ~ ('. i.~. ;.I"~~:~,".I ....~~',. . ; { CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartmental Correspondence TO: Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk SUBJECT: Follow up from August 12, 1996 Work Session COPIES: Elizabeth Deptula. City Manager' I>A~: August 131 1996 / In response to questions raised at the August 12, 1996, Work Session the following ,answers are in final agenda order. Item #23 - Marina Business Plan - Included with the item is a copy of the infomlation Harbonnaster Held provided at Monday's Work Session. Also included is a memorandum providing' additional information regarding the proposed rate increase. Item #26 - Policies BG-8, BG-18 and CC-2 have been modified as directed at the Work Session. Policies CC-12 and GA-2 have been deleted as directed. The City Attorney is investigating whether the requested super majority vote regarding use of the unappropriated retained earnings can be included in the rules resolution or needs to be done by Ordinance. Attached is infonnation from Scott Shuford regarding the PPC's scenic corridor designation. ~, Unfortunately, there is not a concise definition. Item iJ29a - Skateboard Ordinance - a map will be provided Thursday night. Item #33a - DDB Contribution to the eRA - I am attempting to gather the infonnation requested. Hopefully, I will be able to fax it to you tomorrow night. Miscellaneous: A copy of the Morton Plant Hospital Master Plan will be sent to the Commission. I I I, ~~'~i,.~'.ii"'(,:W;;!~""""~"'--'-' .u............-............i'~".....,:""".~...~~........_'lh.i.....:~.~; :"':....>,., """">.. ).~.<.,. ...:'.. ,,' . l. . . ~ '.._~~.~.~WJ.i"'~~d'~+~~"-"'i..:,.~~IJ-{..:j'p~ffi~~"'''^.1'1 . ,~. ~ ~ f, ';;'" ";.1: :'< .,1:, ~~.~:.~.:.::~.~.I:~:>~'~:;)J';}~..;;i;;.:.~:{~ :;.;~t'i t ~ ".~' . , ~~.~ .,.;:; ell, . . . ,I ~, ' :r ',' . ',. fl, '. ., ~; . 'J " :;. , .'. ,.- ;~..': ' " ":-:' ..:. t.;: . >::'11.:;.. , " ;:. . 'l" ,". .'. ;. -" ... p , , '. ,'; "~;, ,',\;' ,:/~,:.,,:t::.::,'? J;i;' ~;!.;~,\;:-":,y,:':,., ,',...,,; :..':~ . '~: ; \ ~..~r' ~ /\ 'to ;:..;.."! .'/: . : ': .:' . The Lo'ca1 Interest Group meeting will be held on October 15, 1996. The location is yet to be detennined but will be in the Downtown area. A notice will be sent once everything is rmalized. The ,agreements, regarding the Chi Chi's Countryside facilities are being reviewed to , determine if batting cages are required. , The, Community Response Team is aware of the Futonics truck issue and is addressing it. '.1. .f 1, ,', " . /" , , , ' ,\ .w"""~"~~7"-' '" ""~:~~~;~~~~'~~.rulJ'r~..~~iol.'#Jh.~~~~_'.~ij~J~ "74-...---...........Wl.tM~~,..4,.~....I~IJI~~~'----..... ~.. .' . ; I , :1;(~;'~~~1o'~.',~ L'/L,o :.;t~.~.....";-";.'.\; .'" ," ..,v::' .",..'"" 10 CITY CLERK P.01 AUG-13-199G UH3G FROf'\ P\...MUNG 8. DEVeLOPI'IEt~1 TO: FAX If: FROM: DATE: MESSAGE: FAX:MESSAGE CITY OF CLEARWaTER DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL PERM11TJNG MUNICIPAL SEaVlCES BUlIJ)ING '100 S. MYRTLE A'VE.. P.O. BO:X 4748 CLEARWATER, JiL 34618-4748 OFFICE PHONE.. (813) 5Q.4S67 FAX PRONE - (813) 562-4576 Cyndie Goudeau Scott Shuford 8113196 " Somic Corridors - Attached are PPC Rules reJ.ating to scaUc c:orrldors. " 1b.ey apply to all or portions of the following Clearwater streets: . Memorial Causeway . N. FL Harrison Avenue .; . Keene Road . Belcher Road . McMullen-Booth Road . Baysidc Bridge . Baysbore Blvd. . Courtney CampbeJJ Causeway Please advise if you need furthet irtformation. Nt.1.MBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING nns PAGE): 6 "f ~ i-. .- . ", I i i "~ ... . ... ......... ~P" -.,. ......-. ~--S:: '~.....::L ,;. ~ AUG-13-1996 HJ:36 FROM Pt..~IHG 8. DEUELOPl'lENT TO ' CITY CLERK P.02 calculated b~ upon the: Count)'Wide P1aD standa.rd. for the land use plan cateZOry of recon1 or as provided for undert11e local plan and regulatlons. whichevCl'sb.nU be the mom restrictive. SEC. 4.2.5 MAP DELlNBATION. Tho local future laDd use plm maps sba1l be conslstcnt if tbO local future 1md use plan d~don for each paroe1 Is equal to or Jess demel1nteme than tbc conu.pondio,g PLt1.P de~on.ln acoordauce with the contimmm of demityr~ry staoc!a.nls wltbln each major plan cla$sification. . SEe. 4.1.6 OTHER STANDARDS. Local faturc land =e plans and development regulatlous sball tactudo poUcles and/or sta1ldatds conslstent with the "atbor staodan1s" OOllt8loecJ h1. !be derc:ripdon of each FLtJP categol)'. 'Where no suth ~ arc in place In the 1oca1 futum J.m:llJSC p1aQ orland dcvclopo1eot regu1atlons., Ibe local future land U$O p1ar1 or !aDd. development re~D 6ba1l be amended to provide for same or be fO\Jnl2 1oco~ "Ibis shall DOt be lnteIpn:ted to ItqUiIe Chat aJoca1 govemmcmproviclefor Che SCC01ldtuy use cJJ.aracteristic:s Jlsted under Other StmdanIs or to preclu~ tbO J.oca1 government from having a smallcr~ morc n:stdctlve aaca.go tlue$bold for plan amendment. SEe. 43,.7 SPECIAL RuLEs. 43.7J. 4.2.1J.J. ScenldNoDooQ)mmeraal ConidOll. ~ ScenlcINon~. COtrldors. as set foI1h tn 1hese lWles and c1cpictec1 on d1c PLUP, shall be deemed to have OOUDtywJcie slgotf"J,C3DCe and will be recogolzed as a &:eolr/Non-Commerolal Omidor~ consJstmJt wilh the ScenlolNon-CoWDlClVla1 Conidor Plan Element of the Orontywide Com.prebemivo P1aD. 1'be IutcDt and ~ or the seen1C/Non-commWal Olntdor deslgnation is to guide the preservat.l0Il~ and f'nh~t:Ot of socmc qua1it1cs.. to ensum 1be. imcgdty of the Coutd.ywidc ~ Land Use PIan mcl to m.'.ld md ~Jwwl Cbe txamc ope:atloo. of tbese espedaD.y ~ roadWay co.aldol1 In PiDe1Ias County. '!be pdDcipa1 objectives of SceDkIN~ Cotddor desigoaUom am: Ii. To I'l*fVc aod eohaoeo sceoJ.o quaUt1= fOUDd aloog tbcsc COD:ldors aad to fostet communlty awareness of 1be sceolc ~ of tbese couidors. B. To~suPenorCommum9'_iud~MnMdlaDdsCapo~cut. both outside of and witbln the pubUc rlgbt..of-way. Co To eDCOUl'agC 1aDd uses 8loDg tb= conkSom wbidl eontd.OOte to an Inlegrated, we1l p1JDQCd IUd \'Jsua1ly ~ cSmlopmeDt pattcm. wbJ1e c1fscouraP2g the 4.2..'1.1.2 ~n.R" ...- 4-8 ~l"lm . ! L. < . 'l,.,~~,.l;.~i' ~I.......... "...,........ " ,-,-~ . ~ \...... .., _ . . .. ....' <" "''''' ' '. .... .", ~ I ~ Lot '.... . } ": . ..~,.l,.~<?.,1 ....,~....,..i...~.;.._ .~ AUG-13-1996 1~): 37 FRIJr'l PLAl'-NING & DEUELOP/,lENT TO CITY CLERK P.03 proutcratJon of commercial. officc. Industrial or incense cesldenUal development beyond areas specifically desiDlated for such uses on Ute PLtJP. D. To as.sist In maintaining the ttafllc operation of roadways within. tbe$e cottlOors tbrough 1311d use type and density! intcns[ty controls. and by confonnancc to 8.<<css management regulations. by selective transit route location. and by tho development of Integrated a.u.d sale pedestrian and bicycle access systems. B. To encouxage design standards Ident1fic4 within lhe "Pinellas ())unty CountywIde Scenlc/.Non-Commercla1 CoIIidor Master Plan" tbrougb. the adoption of 10C!l ordf>>~ aod reguladODS oonslstcot with those staOOaIds set forth with1n the Master l'.lan. 4.2..7.1.3 JJe1loeatJon of SoenIC/Non-O:muncro1al Q>rddors &hall be as fbnows: A. o,mdom shaD be as set Colth wiCbh1 Article 2. Selctfon 23.3.8.2, and as deplctcd 011 tho FLUP map and Submap No. 1 altitlcd .CountywIde Soen1clNon. CommC%Cial Conidor Map". B. An coIrldors or portioos (segmonts) theleof sbaJl be dassffied as cltbcr ~ Open Space-. '1teslcSemla1-. ~ USCo., trt1nlqut/ SQWc Vl.evt'. or "Buh.ancemem Q)nDectofl as Ideud.fled. on the ScenlC/Non--Omunerdal Omldor Map. as approved tlDIJ 3$ It may be subsequently amended. CoITic1or subclasslfications ore Intended to be CODSIste.nt witb the oorrespolX1iD,g approved FLUP categories IS annncrated In tho Sa::01c1Non-Commettial Corridor Plan :Element. Upon amendmeul of tho FLOP adjacent to a Soen1C/Non-Commere1a1 Omfdor. the Corridor SubcIassUicatlon (1Dd aU standards which apply) sba1l be cha:oged con<:tl.1'1'Cl1tty to be consfstent with tbe amended FLUP categories. Sped6caIly. any amtUdo1ent of the FLUP map a~aoeut. to a Sceo1C/Non- Commetdat CbIIidot wm ~ as a fu.nct10D of that amCDdmt4t. any requisite c:haDgc to the OKridor SnbcJassification and said change wm f>> rea~ on FLUP ~Ip No. 1 COQcum:nt with tbc effeet1yO date of the PLUP map amendment.. C. Corridor wfdth shaD. be dc.fe-nni~ coosidedng the depth of each 1aod use which abuts or f\mctiooal1y relates to. the ~adWlY ri&bt-of.way, from a land use, Visual or tmffior~ons standpoint, generally not less than mr ~cttdlog a depth of 500 teet (measwed frOOl the rlght-or-waythatls~ to implem('nt the cwre.ot M.P.O. I.oog RJmgc ~on Plan). 'Ibl) five hUDClre4 (500) feet d18ttmoc mar be eJCpmded or (}hnfntll1vY1. at (be dlsaetion of the Pine11as ~n,g Council aDd COuo1yw!de PJ.aunl-og Anthod1;y for the pwpose of miewiDg ~ to die CbuutywlcSeP.LUPOD1ywbercexctptlooa1~ w8l'l'ant. based upon. but DOt Umlted 10. lbc foDow1ng CCI2Slde:atJoos: J. . The.dista:nCe to. aod .efgt1t.11Dc for. 8 particular ~c view or ,visual cltanaedst1c; 2. Access from tho property in question to the Scen1cINon-CommelClal Omldor and Its tc1atlooshlp ~: and 3. 1bc location mI degree fJ,) wI1lcb any IIWHXJ.adc $UUctUre or natuml fealutc lDtcrrapts or procludes a v1ew or \'1su.alldationsbjp from tile roadway. ~de PIID Rv1ea .. 4-9 Doclembx' I" J.99$ ~ w --~~ -~ " AUG-13-1996 10:37 FROM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 4.2.7.L4 i TO CITY CLERK P.04 Tbe fbllowlni shall be consIdem1 by tile Pi.oeJ1as PllmtlJt\g o"uncU and Co~do Plaaolng Autboricy, in ooooert with otbet c:onsJsteDcy and p1m ameudmeot criteria. lD the rmew of an 8ppUcall0l1 by local govcmment for amendmeut of tbc Count;ywlde PutuR: Land Use Plan (FLOP) on a Soen1C/ NonwCommM:1a1 Omfdor. A.. ~ OWdeUnes .. The exteut ~ which the local government request 18 ~ wlda the tI~"'V"Land Use PIaDlCogidor CJassIOQUon .. CQ,~ GuldeUn~ table. Nod11ng III Cleso comlstmcy guideIiDe8 shall preducte a local govemmeut from btJng moro restdctivc. 1.e., to d~l~ that . particular plan categoxy sbaU not be oonstdcmd 00DSIstcut wUh a particular conidor 111bc1assU1catlon. Irrespoottvc of pmision for same in the foDowlng bbte. B. Residential FLUP aassJ6c:Jtlons. With n:spect to Residential FLUP c1asslfications. the extent to wblctt the local govcmm.eot request d1sco~ the JokosffJcatlon of n:sidential use on a ScentcINoo..oommeroial Conldor. In particu1at, amendment to tho FLUP to IDcreasc JeSirkoliat density shall be tUsC0W'3ged. except where such nuleOOmem Is d~Jued to bo oonsisteut WSd1 the existfog deUneat10n otplan categorieS. adjoinlDg existU\g tISC and. the pwposc end Intc:ut of the SctDlcINon-Commerctal Cotd40r Plan Blcm.eut as applied through the Rules and. 1be otherwise appUcab1c plan ameodmem process. C. Mbttd. USCt Cbmmere1al or ~,strfA1 PLUP Q,IssIncatIoos - With xepr4 to MIxed Use. Oomtnm:lal or Industdal ~ claSSlficattons: 1. Tbc exrem to whicll1ho local govemmCDt request d1scourIlges non- resfdentla1 uses on a SCeD1r1Non<:omn1uc1al Onridor. In part1cu1ar. ~eot to 1he FLUP to snow a new or ~ Mixed Use, Commetdal or ID:tusb:ial plan category sball be d.iscouraged. except whr.rc such ameodmem is: -:. a. the Ioaica1 hrfilJ., ~on or tem1Jnus of an ~ IJOD-- =.d<<ltial plan c:lassificat100: aDd die Joglca1lu.-filI. ~ ortaJ1a~ of an adjo1niDg ~ ~ use; aDd coosid=4 In re1ad0DShlp 10 Ulo tWstfng ~ of wu~ plan caJcgodcs OIl 1ba FLUP J:I.UIp aud (J)rdcIor SUbc1assificatton(s); and. CQT18Istf'.nt with the puIp060 m:f intent of the Steuic,lNon- Commerc1a1 QllIidof Plan BlcmCui as appIied.dJrougb the Rules mI Sbe ()(be:rw1sc applicable pIII1 ~oft1eot process. . ~ .. b. c. d: Oowt) "kid PIm RIz1a ~ l&. t995 4-10 . l YO \ l:)..... ......l.__i-t.. ~ ,.t ~. . . => I "- .. ," ~ I.,' .. . ..' . .....,. . ~\,. . , AUG-13-1996 H) 138 FRO~l PLRNNING & DEVELOPMENT TO CITY CLERK P.05 ':1 ,eUTURE LAND USE PLAN/CORRIDOR CI.ASSIFlCAT~OM .QQNSISTEN9Y GLfIDEUNES : MW/ UHIOUliif IOtOlAffCCNr:NT FIJI .~l!J..~.~D UsEl PlAN l)e~GNATlON ~SI>~ 5S~ -"OCEI) ~ .~VIfYt CQNNWOTOA .JIOIHI'W. , X AQIOQnW. ,."IW.(RI\t X X x ,,"~aull{'l1l) x x x X fWUl8mV. ...NlIINf ~ X X X ~tI1N~ X X X fIS:IIXmW. UMtII ~ )( x X fCIIDCIftW. t/iW NIGOItM tfUIl " x ~MtOf,IMCIW1 x X IIISmnw. Nr3M(Ilq - X x JIiMllMW. mrr.... """ x X WIXIiD "" ~llNfI'BI~ X X ~GIifGW.~ - - x - X IIiS~CMriQ X x MIOftTFAOIlJ1'EI fMAAY~ - - X IQQIn"FIICUfI&I", fIlJl9 - X MlCRTMOII1'GtD4. - - - X QOUWRCW. ~"IIOffIOOO'~ - - x x ~uum:D~ x - X tV 11 "fJII.QU.lISHE\lION ~ X - X .. I COMiIliJlQW.,~PJt X x Hlt.IfnM. 1IQIImlW.~<Q - X II:IUG11\IACI8GW.~ - X ~ ... 8II&MUQ ~" X X X X x ~1MlIiM* X X X X X X - ~(Iq - x X ttmnmOtW." X X X , . . An T ~.. fie A.UP ~ mI1 be co.lCt:tolvd poOlIdWy oor-.ll. tuI;JJoct to... oo.~ ahIMfe. -mil e.o ~ CctMotCIMsfkdon. 1M~of..-X-1ndicIIta tMlllIw FLUP~Ia~conaIcSonN$oorrc:wa"vM1'" Ootrtt:b" CIaeIftoalb.. .1 It.....~oflfDpro\4cIonb~lIo~dol\o(~UMwd~mocittfltft~~1I\mdonsCtlnn... on.~Oocdcklr. .~) ~..Ido~adM 4-11 1>ooedlw 's. ~ . ~ ~.........~...._~..,.~..-..,.........'... I.-,o\,:..~~----'" '. ..... ..' ~.......w............~-..-.. .......o..l........~~ ".......~.*..,.,.~... ....,...; ..,.;.""..',"". 'I.. ".~';"c "t <. 0') 10:..... _....... .1"'Io~(~-~ . ., . .... - , ' ~_.. ~ .. AUG-13-1996 10:38 FRDN PLAt-<<lNG S. DEVELOPI1ENT 10 ClTY CLERK P.0G 2. '!be extem to whlcb the local,govem.tucnt request minltP1te$ an)' locrcasc In dcns:ttyj1nteDs1ty on Q ScenlcINOI1-comm~ Corridor. Specifically, 111 reviewfng any app1J.eation for mn-ttsldential use 00. a ScenlcINon~ Commen:lal Corridor, the proposed denslf1(LDImSlty of use as m.oasu.red by dwo1l1oi unIts per aae, floor atea ratio aud impcMous surface ratio, ~ Is appUcab1c. shall be OODSidenxl with Iho objective of not cx~ng the da.\Sltyr~ of dtbet 1be adjo1nmg mn--ltSldeml3l USC3 or the mld-polnt of the. range for the deDsity/lnt.CO$ity standards of the applicable pIan category, wbJcbevct 15 less. , D. PubUrJSem1~Publlc fLUP OassificadODS - With RSpCCC to Publlc/Sem1-!'ubUc FLOP c1assifieations., the cxtel1t to whIch the local govemmeot IeqUest proyides for PubIlclSem1-Pubnc pIan categOries coosisteot with the c:huactel;',lnteosit)' and scale of the uses permitted witbln these respective categories In rc1adOI1 to tho ~ deUneatlon of pIan categories. adjololog existi.o8 use. the need for and semce area ot tho public/semi-public ~ and tile pwposc tmd fntcot of the ScenlcINon..commerclal OJnltJor Plan nlemenr.u appUed through the R.ules and the otherwise applicable plan amenclment process. B. Scenic,fNon-Commerdal Q,IJIdor P1ao. B1cmem ..1bc extent to which the local tpvtmmelll teq\1t$t has taken 1nSO acctlUIlt 1he ScmlC/NOD-Commercia1 COrridor PIan Element, fDcludfDg the Goals, Objectives and PoUcles artlcutJtttd within the Plan Eltmel1t, as Is Idevant to the particular pIan ameodlUCDl u.odcrCODsi<Seration. Couslstmt with Its advisory nature, d1e S<:enIC/Nou.--Cbmme:cla1 Coaidor Plan Element sba1l not sct\'c as a basis for denial of a plan ame.oda1ent. P. MPO Long Range Ttamportadon Plan ~ 'Ibe ~ to which the local aovcmment request bas taken into aocount the <:utIeGt M.P.O. Long Range Transpodation PJm. and any ~ aocess maoage01eQ.t staneJaxds, as Is rdcvmt to the particular roadway uOOer coDSidaation. Particular consideration shall be glven to the est8bllshcd poHcles of the ,govemmemal cmlty baYIDg ~on and. m!ltntP.n~ ~bi1ity over tho subject facUlty. . . , O. ~do Sign Regolations - Tho extcDtto which tbe1oca1govemmem Ieqoest has takCllIDtO toCOtmt the ewut,."ido SfgD O%dmallOO, Part m ~ 16;2, as amended. of the 8DeRas 0nm1y Lana De1dop:nem Coc.fc lnd.\IdiDg provisloos 'Whlcfa govem the plaoemeD.t of off-pmnlse sIgds. as Is Rlmmt to the particular plan amea1meat UDder consfdemfkm. 4:l.':l 7omsf'erable DeveIonment Rl2hts.. PcnnlUcd deusHy~ty as provided for IIDlJet ftJo lWP and Ihe$e' Rule$ U1l)" be ttaosf'we4 from osz FLUP '*8,(1)' to 8DOIhet FLUP categoly as part of a FLUP amendment or 10caI aovemmeut actioo. CO~~~ with tbc otherwise applicable provisloos of the FLUP and tbeso Rules md as heIe1Daftet pmvided. for. ~....n.~ 4-12 ~I..am TOTAL P. 06 t~,> ," ( " .J . -; -: '1 ,'" ,:.' :_~ ~ :\~:~'; : ~~"~.<,"'~ t t ~ , t I ~ j .'. ; , .' ,,: '. .: , I,' , ct' ' (.." , I:'" " . ;'~ ~ I,. ;_h.~ . " I .' ;. I': '.' .'~ , . >:, .', . "c.. t.. .~. .t'~: .., I,' '., . .'\ . .,' ""\' .'., . ~ " : . , " .... .'.' '\' . ... '. .. . . '. -.1. '. ~ t; /( :,::~i,(,~.:..i::I,; ':~i~:':;'\? ~';;,r; .....V..~~..,," ~.,.,.~....~.,'..iC:~>'...-.:'.:." '"" ".,':".', :,' ~, . . . I TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COPIES: DATE: ',. .i'trf '.'~" C.I T Y OF C LEA R W ATE R Interdepartmental Correspondence Mayor Garvey Sally Thomas, Agenda Clerk lnvocation Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk August 1 5, 1996 Tonight's Invocation will be offered by Reverend Tom Norton, Skycrest United Method'lst Church, 2045 Drew Street, 34625 ,. No s~ow C.om Vl1 \~ <; '~VI-e.. r C \ o:rk: \ , .~ ~~~>lI#-'~'~'" p:r I .. __.....Iow-.....uw.,.>.1:'I'AooI"""...oI.,,"\~........~ .> "., :-~.,.~.: ./~....:..'.:: ..,~i~1f;.,)\"\..J.~,.': - ..~_..~_..~-~......'Iilti.....-u;i;;),\&;;~..~. ,""'~ " ~, ,,-' . ," ~ ,~~ , . -":.:1:; . . '., ~ . ~.; d.,' c ~ < .....,. I~ ,~..-.... \4,.u .. . .... l- .... ~'? . CLEARWATER CITY COMl\llSSION Agenda Cover Memorandum Item I: Mooting Dato: ,8112/96 8/15196 SUBJECT: SERVICE AWARDS RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION: The following employees be presented with service awards for their length of service in the employment of the City of Clearwater. IBI and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: 5 Years Peter Mavromatis Charlie Sims Dale C. Hufford Solid Waste Public Works Finance 10 Years Glen Altomare Richard L Zinge, Jr. . Rex D. Whittenberger Charles J. Esposito WiJHam K. Dauber Michael J. Waters Sammie G. Rayner Public Works Police General Services Police Finance Police Finance 15 Years Catherine M. Slack Viola M. Wasilewski John A. Walton" Marlinda J. Neal Police Engineering Gas Finance 20 Years Ruth P. Weglarz Police ~o Years Marlene P. Havens Library Reviewed by: Originating Department: COltS: Commllslon Action: IAga! HUMAN RESOURCES o Approved Budget Total o Approved w/Conditlon. Pufoh..lng Unr Department: o D,nled Rlak Mgml. Current Rlcal Vear o Continued to: 18 Funding Source: ACM o c.p1tal Improvement: Other Advertl..d: 0 Opel.lIng: : Da1e: 0 Attachments: Othe r: Pep.r: Submitted o Not RequIred Appropriation Code by: Affected PBrtlel: CJ Notlfled o None City M.n.ger o N01 RequIred T. .....~_ ......._"".,......... ~ ........_......".....,;,.;...."I............I.,.....o;_....~~~~~.....~..-~ .... -, ...".........>~.....,<-."'"' '.-1.... ..~ . :,...... . .~~-:.....,.,:l.....:\-o-........~~~.... I.>..;.r.~.<..... ~ , " , 'i <.. . ", ,', ;~.'~.tc.':',<. ~~'~'.""::'''~:r., ..,....~.It..........~,~~.......-......~ ~.' .' : "... .. -I COPIES TO: COMMISSION TO: Mayor Rita Garvey Betty I. Blunt, Confidential Clerk Receptionist AUG 15 1996 FROM: PH~tiS CLERK f ATTORNEY COPIES: ,City Commissioners, Betty Deptula, Cyndie Goudeau SUBJECT: Presentation at the August 15, 1996 City Commission meeting DATE: August IS, 1996 The following presentations will be made at the August 15, 1996 City Commission meeting: 15 years Marllnda Neal, F1nance Oetter of appreciation, plaque) AWARDS & PRESENTATIONS ChIef Sid Klein - Recognition of PoUce Explorer Post #31 competition team and their advisors Donald Rutledge, Program Coordinator - Career Options of PineUas, Inc. Summer Youth Employment Program wiD be presenting youth participants and three employers that will speak 2 minutes each concerning the program. Norman Sclunldt and Larry Home-State of Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security Division of Safety A ward of Achievement will present safety award to Chuck Warrington, Terry Neenan, Milt Cason, Clearwater Gas System and Fred Delzel, General Services '"ROCLAMATION Rich Baler - WATER AND POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATOR WEEK , " '... ~~ l 1 .... -:' - ... Jt..L-20-' 96 SAT 20:04 to: FAXt-.O: IU04 P02S'.b.- . . Usherlne in the Arts - The (Ampaien for the' , ;r !~!i 'l4fJ LARGO CULTUM.LGE~IER ~~~'\ 0;, p.o. B9~)96 LAROO, FLORIDA 34649-0296 (813) 587.6720 ., July 8, 1}J}'6 . Ms. Betty Dqptu]a, City Munagcr City of CleaP,Natcr P.o. Box 4748 Clearwater, PL 34618 Dear Ms. Deptula: The City of Larso and the City of Clearwater have n1ways been good neighbors. Therefore, on behalf of the steeriDI oommittee or The Campa/In for the Largo Cultural Center, ( would like to request permission to make a presentation at your next possible city commission meeting or work senioD about our communlty- , wide fund ..-bing ef!'ort. We seek to raise $S92,OOO.00 for construction of this muJti..use performing arts facility in Largo Central PllIk. As a member 01 the campa;g1! steering committee, I Invite the City of,C;;learlVater to jaln more than 500 ciJizens, busJne.sses, organizations, and the City of Bel/eair Beach.,lA!.!lh Q .glft,o the campaign. As 8 fonner wgo mayor. I can attest to bow difficult it hlis been for our conununity perfonnfns artists and groups to find suitable space for tJleir activities. The Largo Cultural Center win ~rn8tc that shortogcl This 23.000 square foot muJti~use perfonning arts facility. now under construction in Largo Central Park. will provide a wonderfbl hQm.e for community theater, music, and dance programs. ~~~~ ~.~. 1'~ Though the Cultuml Center will be in Largo, it will draw people from many communities. Our rCCQrtls show that citizens from your community also participate in Largo's cultural arts programs such as community theater and dnnce: Therefore. we bcijeve that your gift to The CnmpDign tor the Larao Cultural Center is trUly an investment em behalf of your own residents. when Ruth Eckerd Hall was built, several municipalities surrounding CleotwA1er made sizable gifts to support its construction. City leaders saw that the facility would benefit the entire region. not just Clearwater. The City of Cl1;UIW8tcr'S gift would follow this positive precedent Your contribution will put you in the company of the community minded corpomtions, organizations. and individuals that have alreadY 'given or pledged nearly 5480,000 to Jhis fund raising campaign. . A rcpn:sentativc from the office of Susan Sudni1c, another Steering Committee member. will contact you oex.t week to see when we might be able to tell you about this exciting project. In the' meantime, please feel free to QOntact Development Director Ann Ladenbcrgcr at 587-6720, on 5013, for more information. I) '. . Thank you for your consjdemtion. I look forwurd to adding your name to our donor listingl Sineerely. ' iLl aiutv'J.,D;.)I~ Warren Andrews )''' Steering Committee Member, The Campalau tor tbe Largo Cultural Center cc: Mayor Thomas Feaster, Recreation and Parks Director Cathy Santa, Partners N Progress President Joanne Frizzell, Steering Committee Chair George E. Feaster, Steering Committee Member Susan M. Sudnik ^ ... ... ... ... ~ It 0 J Po (~" () F .r Ii E: rART~F.R5 N PRO 0 R rc' s' 's ' . . ji . ci li' 'N' ". ^' :i. ''j'' 0 . N . ~.V~';ini11.".:';~r";~,.,.., ,".". .4.....'-.:....... , . r.i . l' > ., . . .t I " ,: I.."''. " .' . '::,' :.}>~\:.: . ~::~q1t":;:~~!~'iYL"!:"";' ~""" '_." .. _, ......... ;....... ',~' ,"'.' .: ", . '" . I . ..,~' . . ... \ re 5. ,> PINELLAS PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL~ INC. . IS NOW CAREER OPTIONS OF PINELLAS. INC. . ' Regional authorities, preViously known as Private Industry Councils had been responsible for oversight of job training.programs funded by the federal Job Tr~g Partnership Act. However, last year, in anticipation of cuts in JTP A money and the creation of new programs to be funded by federal block grots, Governor Lawton Chiles signed an . executive order regarding the PIC's to consolidate into 25 regional Workforce Development Boards under a statewide Jobs and Education Partnerships. . The fonner Pinellas Private Industry Council is now Service Delivery Area 14- Career Options of Pinellas, Inc. qur name has changed, but our mission has not. #". . " , . ~ . ...'. , . ~r,h'~~.....--':--:--:--' ~~- . . . .' '... -~~r''''_'''''''~.'''M'_~~'~': . ~"'---"~~~U.l",......',....<;t~~~!. ~ .......- -~- .... I' j< , ,. I. j " . / ~.. \ ."; .~': <: ~ ", ~~....~; .. , .' re 5 OVERVIEW OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PROGRA1v.I - 1996 The 1996 City of Clearwater's Summer Youth Employment and Training Program began on June 17 through July 26. Each youth worked up to 30 hours per week in private sector businesses. Youth ages 14-15 earned $4.25 per hour, youth ages 16- 18 earned $5.25 per hour and 19-23 earned $6.25 per hour. o Total Nwnber of Participants: 141 worked at least one day, 114 completed. Contract called for 120. .0 Twenty-one youth were hired either full or part-time as a result of the program. Please see attached list. o . The Summer Recognition Luncheon was held at the Harborview Center on July 25. The purpose of the luncheon was to recognize the youth and the employers of Clearwater. The luncheon was sponsored by the Community Relations Department of Clearwater, Barnett Bank and Career Options of PinelIas, Inc. (formerly the Pinellas Private IndustIy Council). o . Five employers received plaques at the Recognition Luncheon for continued participation in the program. These employers were: Reconstructive Dentistry (Dr. Pratt), Ward's Seafood, Cleanvater Centre, Emerald City and All Season's Produce. o Speakers tonight are: Youth - Carilyn Hasel - who worked at Gateway Transportation Initiative, Charles Jackson who worked at Symanski & McKnight, P .A., and Ashanti Rowe who was placed at Florida Power and has been hired part time. Employers - Lace Mobley from Gateway Transportation Initiative, Robert Pratt, DDS from Reconstructive Dentistry and David Levenreich, Attorney at Law. . .. - --- -- ~----- ---------.-----..--- ~ " ~~ i. ., ..-'!", .+~~....o ~.' . ~ . ::.....::. "~":'~:1 :", :;';"'.':"~~~"!.""~_~'H"'~'_"""" "'" ~~:.V _ ~.U.'! ,,/ ~~, .l ~ re- 5 . . PERMANENTL Y EMPLOYED PARTICIPANTS: . Youth Employer Chavaun Crum, Kristel Pettis, Altamese Bennett . . . Emerald City , Robert'Mitchell . Lincourt Phannacy Curtis Gillenwater AMC 5 Theaters Shawandra Floyd Dr. Bindeman, Dentist James Glenn Subway Ashanti Rowe Florida Power Corp. Kelli Bailey Clearwater True Value " Kersheena Bland Dr. Fausto Garcia Jonathan Wade, Jr. Radisson Resort - Sand Key JosaIyn Triplett . Christopher Poole , . Florida Insurance Company Bill & Brad's Detail . Joshua Williams Publix on Island Way I, Carl Gillenwater Professional Investment Mgmt. Eric Todd, Boshawn Mack All Season's Produce Jasmine Schennerhorne Video Group Distributors Quiand Fields Westcoast Phannacy Donyelle Childs M&J Used Furniture . Benjamin Hainmond Workbench, Inc. " ~ ~. ~ I. . ~ ;. \ :"....:~~; >', .....\ .' : ,',: . .~ ":';""'~'~'~'I: ..'.", ,........ .~ : d . R.ec\! Re. 'I August 15,1996 Clearwater City commissioners Dear Commissioners, To put my suggestion in writing: 1. A World Class resort doesn't fill every available natural view and stretch of green with cement and cars. 2. Captain Henderson requested far more than the 46 parking spaces the staff has recommended. The proposed lot will not meet the perceived need. 3. We are removing 30 spaces from Mandalay Avenue with the streetscape. 4. We are just before spending money to restripe the parking spots on the Beach, making them more narrow...i.e. less safe. 5. The owners of Pelican Walk have already proposed a deal to place a parking garage over their parking lot. This would put considerably more space less than a city block further away from the Marina than the proposed Causeway lot and closer to the beach than the Causeway Lot. 6. By building the parking garage at the Pelican Walk site. We could: 1. Have a convenient parking garage which could serve both Mandalay, the Marina (at least as well as the Causeway lot) and the beach.with.less negative visual impact at the entrance to our world class resort. 2. Move the extensive reserved parking spaces for Coast guard and post office employees from the Marina parking lot. 3. Provide a parking spot accessible to the Jolley Trolley for those. unable or unwilling to walk to the Marina. 4. Avoid spending $100,000 for a temporary solution. (If we just have to spend that money, we could buy another Trolley to make the route more time effective for working people.) We don't lose our view, our beauty, our esthetics in one large sweep.. We give it up a little piece at a time until one day we wonder where it......and the visitors who used to enjoy it.....are gone. There are not enough pieces left on Clearwater Beach that we can afford to give up any of it. A~ne Garris -- 446-4410 :" -..._'l"ttl"l:n n<<:.r .;'H'."~ . ~." c .. ".~. ~ :.~~_~...I<r.,......".... .., .. . I O~\~~M- M~"te (L L QC ~-n......1 R.~cv '1 re.. Joe. ~\J\C~ (!) Loc.A--n II ~ - .--;- --.----r.--.-.-.-.-'- ,;.,,, .~. ...,....... ! l>~'.., ~' ~~. t~ :J\.j., ,!f,)'~:';'~" ~1;!;' -. 1',~.iJ:...~/\, ,. ..',...r- i~. . I' " . _' ~. . ~ . . r' ~ :;,~~.,~;.:-,.;' ".~.' , I .' I \ \, --~ @ '''''""'- '" .... . ~O?Ga..'l ~ L-~~~ ~ Q (2. \'-e fl. t ~~1\ LlML -~-~........_--- L 1 r\Q, ~\. Mb"\r'1 MeT(n. --7 ", 8 ~otf':.lIt"f" -.a" ~'~,~ 1. c. I L.~ ' .. .\1 I (" 1. ~ ~ (.J - U\ k j 'S 01 c! U 12 IJ ~ Q ~ 3 t:; J. ?-t cj 4: -Jti --;f/:;- o v, - <, u: \S> - t:t ":> '1 o 0 ~ - €) oJ ~ IJ ~ c .j "1 Q "5 ~ J <:t ~ (.1) ~ (l (lJ ~ ..,j ~ r: j f ~ oJ ~ 1 ) tJ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ li4 11. J o r1 '.I ~ LL () LA u. o ri V Q) ~ c ~ o QI c:v <: 0,1 ... q -e: \;; ~ " JOSEPH W. EVIen 2296 HABERSHAM DR. CLEARWATER FL 34624 CITY COM:MISSIONERS CITY OF CLEARWATER P.O. BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL. 34618 i . AUGUST 7, 1996 DEAR COMMISSIONERS; I RECENTLY READ IN A NEWS ARTICLE, MR. TOM HACKETT'S EXPLANATION REGARDING STAFF'S JUSTIFICATION FOR MOVING WATER lv1ETER'S ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY AND HE INDICATED HOMEOWNER'S FEARS ARE UNWARRANTED. I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THOSE COMMENTS. FIRST, I CONCUR WITH COMMlSSIONER SEEL'S COMMENTS THAT THE CITY IS HARMING IT'S RESIDENTS AND SHOULD EXPECT A COMPLETE EXPLANATION FROM STAFF INCLUDING A LEGAL OPINION. MR. HACKEIT INDICATED THAT THE CITY IS RESPONsmLE FOR ANY LIABll..ITY WInCH OCCUR'S FROM THE :METER NO MATTER WHERE IT IS PLACED. CAN I GET TIllS IN WRITING FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY INDICATING I HAVE NO LIABll..ITY. l\1R. HACKETT SECOND POINT NOTED THAT MEETERS AND SERVICE LINES ARE BEING REPLACED, WIDCR I CONCUR WOULD BE GOOD PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE. HOWEVER IT DID NOT MENTION THAT THEY WERE BEING MOVED FROM THEm. EXISTING RIGHT -OF-WAY LOCATION TO PlUV ATE PROPERTY. HE ALSO IMPLIES THAT EVEN ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET FROM THE MAINS, NEW SERVICE LINES, lv1ETERS AND RELOCATIONS ARE TAKING PLACE. I QUESTION TIDS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE METERS BEING REPLACED. I DONT QUITE UNDERSTAND THE COMMENT THAT HOMEOWNER'S HAD TO PAY FOR smEW ALKS DURING REP AmS. WHAT REP Arn.s? YES, I DO UNDERSTAND THAT FROM THE METER TO THE HOUSE WOULD BE THE HOMEOWNER'S RESPONSffiILITY, BUT WHAT REPAm.S IS HE REFERRING TO? IF THE CITY OR SOlvffiONE I HillED DAMAGED THAT SECTION THEY WOULD BE RESPONSffiLE FOR THE DAMAGE. . CAN MIl HACKETT IDENTIFY THE AREA WERE METERS, NOT COVERS, WERE BEING DAMAGED BY CARS AND THE NUMBER OF OCCURRENCES OVER THE PAST 12 TO 24 MONTHS AS WELL AS COST JUSTIFY THIS ANSWER TO THE COST OF RELOCATION OF THESE METERS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY. ,,=, / ~ ' . .' '. ", ,:" \. ~ ,> MR. HACKET'rs COMMENTS REGARDING OTHER UTILITffiS IS NOT THE ISSUE AND THEY ARE GOVERNED UNDER SEPARATE ORDINANCES AND EASEMENTS . GRANTED. MR. HACKETT ALSO MAKES THE POINT THAT RESIDENTS WHO WANT SERVICE MUST PROVIDE A PLACE FOR THE METER. EVEN IF I AGREE WITH illS COMMENT, WIDeH I DOlfT, I WAS NEVER CONTACTED AS TO WHERE I WOULD LIKE IT . LOCATED. I HAD SERVICE ALREADY BEING PROVIDED AND THE PROPERTY ALREADY OCCUPIED WITH SERVICE BEING PROVIDED TO MY RESIDENCE SINCE IT WAS BUILT AND CAN NOT ARBRlTRAL Y FORCE ME OR ANY OTHER HOMEOWNER TO GIVE UP MY PROPERTY RIGHTS OR FORGO HAVING WATER PROVIDED TO MY HOME. THAT WOULD BE UNJUSTIFIED. THIS ORDINANCE PROVIDES FOR THE NONE OF THE POWERS ASSUMED BY THE CITY AND SHOULD EITHER COMPENSATE ME THE OTHERS FOR OUR PROPERTY . OR MOVE IT BACK. NO EMINENT DOMAIN OR CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS WERE USED EITHER. I HA VB ATI ACHED A COPY OF A LETTER I SENT TO THE CITY MANAGER MONDAY 8/5/96 AS WELL AS THE ARTICLE I REFERRED TO. .: l I KNOW YOU Wll.L PROBE THIS JSSUE TO HA VB ME PROVIDED A SOUND LEGAL OPINION WIllCH CLEAIU. Y DEFINES TO EVBRYONE.THE CITY'S INTERPRETATION AS WELL'AS A LETTER INDICATING I HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR TInS METER ON MY PROPERTY. ' . SINCERELY YOURS. ~.N~~ ~~P~ w. EVIeH . . >.' . , , ',.' r ( I t T' :.:.: ' . ~ ~ '. 'Timer. pholO - JIM U,/\/l>lA/)I\a. led along w.lth surrounding land by former Clearwa- on tho site. . AS cornrmS8lUfltI(, "............., ....... _ Fred Thomas was a softer kind of. guy," clean-shaven man..' ,sports a full beard. , ,: CLOWN FACES: Monica Miller, left; and' her twin sister ' M.~r~la MUler, both of . : ,,'Sarasota, take . . part In a skit . Su"day during :, ,Clownarama at - Clearwater . , MaU:Nearty -100 clowns' par:tlclpate'd In celebration of NationallClown Week, which "!'. ~gan S.unday. - SCOTT KEELER . . ' ,. poliee ;;aid. He was treated at the lies and flown by helicopter to' Bay- ' Ilter.in St. Petersburg. No one else :e Said Ferris had surgerY sUnday , ,lto'sUivive~'. ,... ." " ' . .."11 ~ . . . . , ., Meter'relocation .. ' surprises resi~ents 2 3 and covered with lids that are: : r?ughly the size of a large cookie : ~ tin or place mat.' . : ' F qrmer city Commissioner Lee: : ' Regulski, who lives in' the area,' . said in another recent letter that: . the;p~ctice'appeared to be a ~'vil);.': ' ,I' lation '6( property rights;'~... ',:, I'. :' CLEA~WATE~ -.-To the ' R~gu1s1d'~ said 'he tm4?ia: ' ,great surpnse of reslden~,~cross a hand, m a,pprovmg the ordinari~. large area of. central Clearwater. . that allows the meters to oo\reto-- ' the city is installing a new piece of . cated. Had he Jalowri it wowd have' ' hardware on their. front lawns;", . beeD. used this way, he wroteJhe: ; Water meters; are -being' would'not,have voted Codi. 'J' :: , yanked from their iraditioruit place ). The . issue has grabb&t the at-.: on cltr propertyibetween the'curb ....tention ~~ Comm~ssione(lCar,en: and wdewalk. and relocated to a ,Seek whose mot:h:er's' lawn' in: "a. , ' spot' about 1 Coot onto private ~ neighborhood south of qearivater: property. . ,,', ' , >>.igh School is having iuMneters: ' The encroachment ha~ not ,'relocated.. ' ,I ..' , , , been well-received by residents, ,. ,: "I'm ~ust, cqnce~ed~t, we ' who seem more concerned about.' .are harming our resIdents," ~d, the legal implications than about . Seet.who requested ,n complete, the effect .on their carefully main- .; explanation from city administra- ~ ' . tained lawns'. tors by the commission's next' In a letter,last week t~ the i:ity, ~.," meeting. . " '.. : Steven L. Griffin president' of the On Frlday, howeve.r, r,om. Morningside-M~dows HomeoWn- Hackett, the ~ty's water 5U~~: er's Association, expressed fear ' . t~dent, prOVIded 'a full explatia-: that residents would be held liable,: tion. , ,,' I if someone were hurt on a meter. ' He made.sev?rat.points: The'meters are encased in .. The cIty IS, hable fo~ any cast-iron boxes, which are buried' Please see METER Page 6' . The homeowners' fears are unwarranted, the .;' citYs water c;:hief says. . . By THOMAS C. TOBIN .'I1mM 8taffWllW .'" ,.', ,", J.~I'" (. "",<~':\.~.t~::t;:}.n;.(.lt.r..t.'.7}~ ...'1.:.'"..i"'....i,o;....}..,... ... ....:l.~'...'l.~,~. .~~I.~:.l:\.:..;.:,I'"l~I:f~... /I~..':",l~"'" .~ . ... . ". " . f} 'f ,,'',If,~,/ I 1 . \ -----{.J-- b.... ...----.--t" 'r' " , . , ' " ~ : " ,; 'f of j' " " r Ii!; j.; I:' =: " I, I: I I , J ~ f ,~ \ ~ 11 ( ,I ~ . ~ ( ~ ',' .' even the portion under the side-- walk. When the meters were near. the curb, that meant a homeowner had to pay for sidewalks that were ruined during repairs. No1Y, that 'portion of the pipe is the city's responsibUi ty. . Meters near the curb were being dam~ged by cars. It also was difficult to read them when cars parked over the lids. a Other utilities, including elec- tric, cable television and natural gas companies, have for years placed their meters on private property. The city's ordinance states that people who want Clear- ' water water service must provide a place for the meter. .,.... ......wu lIwUtU'OUl Ul a crowu;' LUrt: Slore. ! tlomas plans to dcmol- Thomas sa.iif, he will use his ish the front half of the store to .skills in his n'exi' venture, dubbed make way for parking. The back Uncle Fred's~Wooden Toy F,actory. half will be a Pinch-A-Pcnny pool The business 1will be in an aban- store with two "experimental bou- doned'doWntoWn train station at tique" businesses. 655 C~II"rt ~t.. which; Thomas One of the businesses, he said, bought ml1995 while he was still on will sell barbecue supplies from the cOmnlission. cookers to sauce. He plans to offer It will sell only wooden toys, a cooking classes and demonstrate few of Which will be bUilt by Thom- the products with continuous (ood as and fabout it dozen volunteers. preparation. Thomas said he is searching {or The other business is architec- other, toy lines to help fill the tural lighting. Thomas said custom- shelves;... ers will be able to bring in photos of F~r every ,toy sold, he said, a their homes. The photos will be toy will be I donated' to children in entered into a computer, which will need. They'll be' parceled out in this produce Images of what the home order. children," iri hospitals, chU- would look like with various Ught- drOO in ab'use shelters, childre'n in ing options. taster ho~es and 'Poor children. To the south o( the train sta- " , The toys, he',said, will be de- ,tion, on two properties now occu. signed (or kids;8.g~ .2-5. There Will." pied by agfug homes, Thomas plans be cars, ,trow; ,trains and planes, a restaurant and a rental business siplply constructed and painted in for skates and bicycles. The station 'primary Colors. ':, . and the restaurant will straddle the Thomas plans to open the bus i- downtown segment of the Pinellas .: proaches his 60th bi~thd';Y,' tn March. , " , He Mid he Will 'relish aU lhe'). sweat and hands-QI\ experience ofJ ' woodworking.' .~, '" III'm just kind of clearing my I ' head,'! he said. "Letting my brain: , get the bugs cleared out of it." '.i''', . Thomas said he's 'working lO,. " counteract the past three years'" r': which he ~pcnt throwing his ener-: giea into city government., 11Th at ' left aU the other parts of my life out. .. Today, he is looking after his! wife,Joy, who is ill willi rheumatoid arthritis; his mo'ther-in-law, who lives with them; and a 74-year-old retarded uncle who lives in a local group hOtne. ' '~I'm entering the fInal,quarter 'of my game and I want to ,score," . he said. III want to put Some points on the board. I am not a single~{ac~ eted individuaJ." ': For the moment, he said, "I'm ' just a little old toyrnaker!' r '/ 'j .. " '" " " , - " Meter from Page 1 problem caused by a meter, wheth- ~r it's on private property or not. . The change is part of a city- ' wide water main replacement proj- ect thaes in.its eighth year. When mains are replaced, so'are the "ser- vice lines" that'go into each home . and so is each mefer ~ AS long as the city was working in the area, it decided to install new service lines and meters on blocks that were not getting new water mains. . Homeowners are responsible for any problems With a.service line from the meter" to their homes, The problem appearS 'to result from residents' not being'\notified of the change or ~ts implications. Hackett S<tid fliers were distrib~ uted about the water main project, but nothing was said' about the water meter relocations. Griffm. the homeowners' asso~ dation president, said the neigh~. ' borhood always has worked well with the city and unsuccessfully ; tried to get a full explanation. ( "We had worked it through sev- , eral different channels, and nobody' I would give us a straight answer," , ' he said. Regarding the liability issue, he ' said the residents would like some- ~ thing in writing. . \ . ., Waler SOm . ,. -Hard Water? .: -Uma Deposits? -Water Slll1ts? -Well Water? -OdorS -CII1Ules stalnell7 ,': -FIxtures Rlllned7 'i -Iron? -Sulphur? -B~ We Speclallil In the TfealmeD Private Wells t ADVERTISEMENT THIS ENTIRE fEATURE CONSISTS OF PAID ADVERm rl~jj r .. , ' , . ' . ' ~ - JOSEPH W. EVICH 2296 HABERSHAM DR. CLEARWATER FL 34624 CITY MANAGER MS.,BEITY DEPTULA CITY OF CLEARWATER P.O. BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL. 34618 DEAR MS. DEPTULA, A FEW MONTHS BACK THE CITY INST ALLED!REPLACED NEW WATER LINES ALONG THE STREET AND UNDER THE SIDEWALK. ANOTHER PROJECT THE CITY DID CONCURRENT TO TIllS WAS TO MOVE THE WATER METER FROM THE CURB TO BEYOND THE TWEL VB INCH RIGHT MOFMW A Y FROM THE SIDEWALK TO MY PROPERTY WITHOUT MY CONSENT. I DID ATTEMPT TO HAVE DISCUSSIONS ON THIS MATTER WITH BOTH:MR. BAlER AND MS. AKINS. I WAS NEVER REALLY GIVEN ANY REASONABLE EXPLANATION FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE METER WIDCH ONLY OCCURRED ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET. THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION THAT THE CITY COULD MOVE TIllS METER ON MY PROPERTY BASED UPON SOME ORDINANCE. I HAVE REVIEWED THE ORDINANCE CITED TO ME AND HAVE A DIFFERENT INTERPRETATION AND WOULD APPRECIATE A BETTER CLARIFICATION OF HOW THE CITY HAS THE RIGHT TO TAKE MY PROPERTY WITHOUT MY CONSENT. FIRST, LET ME ESTABLISH THE FACT THAT SERVICE WAS BEING PROVIDED TO THIS RESIDENCE FOR THE 11 YEARS THAT I HA VB RESIDED THERE WITH THE IvIETER AND CONNECTION IN ITS' LOCATION BEFORE BEING MOVED ONTO MY PROPERTY. SECOND, IN REVlEWING ARTICLE IV OF THE ORDINANCE, I COULD NOT FIND ANY PARAGRAPH INDICATING THE CITY HAS THE POWER TO, AT ITS' WilL, TO MOVE A PROPERLY FUNCTIONING METER ONTO MY PROPERTY WITHOUT MY CONSENT. . THIRD. THE REMOTE SECTION I COULD IDENTIFY WAS SEC. 32.095(1). THIS SECTION AS I INTERPRET IT IS FOR NEW INSTALLS AND NOT REPLACING OR MOVING SERVICE. SERVICE WAS NEVER LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND I NEVER GA VB, NOR DID PREVIOUS OWNERS GIVE, PERPETUAL RIGHTS TO INSTALL THIS METER ON Tms PROPERTY. ~~~~;;{!I~~~Ar-:.~~.t...~_. ~~ ... . . ~-...... ~ -. .. _....,. ,,"T . . . . .... _ .. '.'.' . .', .~ (~. '. t '\,,' . . " " ;:~: . :'~. > .' . ~. . .t c ~. , " ..... .;'~; ( :' ')~i':'. ~ .;~ -:.~ I' ' . f ;'~.~ .1 > '1- . c:;:t.' . " 'r' ,. 'J" .~>:' " ".t.).' '.11 ,..... ;.. 1o~~ : c {ri<:~ '\.' . :r::, ': . ~:'~";:~: ". ~~. t~': .' I:}) . .. ~ . . ~1 ".. . '. "f-' . ~:~ : .' I . 0.1: . .:<' ~. : .... ;.~!~'. ." . . ::i~:/: ~'. ,.' f" , :.," . '.. ", ". -- ~.' , ~ . 1, . ~f:,: . '.~;.',.) ," ~tL' . j.:~ ~ ..,' ';:1,. .'. . . I, ',' ,c ~: ".' . ' ;. ., <.....~ "",:. . ''oj '. '. ~ ~rL ...... rl'{:~:;" . ~r l "I . ,... <,1 .~: .' . ,....:.. ~~~~~:..: . c i "; . . ~'. .":' i ..' . .;. '~." ., . r: '. '. . ~l;: '. > .. ' . "" ,'. . r.. .......\ ... ~ '" , <......:., i,:.:' " " . ", . 'i '.. ..' d ". ~ ~,. ""~' '1 ". . -', .' . ~ I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU HAVE TIDS METER MOVED BACK TO ITS' ORIGINAL LOCATION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND OFF MY PREMISES. I ALSO REQUEST A RESPONSE AS TO HOW THE CITY CAN JUSTIFY TI-llS WITHOUT MY CONSENT. . . . BEITY," IN MY OPINION TIllS WAS AN UNNECESSARY EXPENSE OF TAX DOLLARS TO RELOCATE AND NOT NECESSARY AND ILLEGAL TO MOVE ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT CONSENT. . . I AWAIT A JUSTIFIABLE AND LOGICAL EXPLANATION. SINCERELY YOURS. .~'trJ&VV'-' . 1bS~H.~; EVICH , . \) . . . , . . j.. .t 1 f I I ! , I ! 1 ! , ! ! \ , , :. ) \, ~>:::i~.C\ . ".: ",it -. ~; >. '. .~ .. .- 0 , . ,.... .~ ,I .',-'> o. j,.... .,' . :;,::.!:: .:L' .'; ~ ~ ~ 1- ': I , . j.. ,j": "\ ~:~ "<: ,,1;<, .t' '0 .. ~'~-~;.~ >;; ~. :~<<'.. ~~~~':::".. ,~. ~y ~,~}, \:'.' .:"f. '1 .'f,:'~i ".1- {~~"~' ,. ~';>':: ...,.j'l~ ", . ~~\\Y<'.~ . ." . l'jYU : '(Ft- .. " [.~~: .' ,. !;..-'.'<, '0. ";\".H . . ~ . f~~ ,', . ::.~l;: " .~:.~; ,. ...J'.< . ~~t;'~~'j'" ," ~:i, \~':. . ':Y;::':": ~;.:); f~~~:' :: . .' ~ :. c; ,j .1":, 1:. . . ~ i: ~ ,:.:~:': .[ .;~:' '~. ',' ~j;';.;. ' !~~'~"" . ~:~;~ .'.: . {'f!>.:.' :':" . . t ~ ~~J1,;~',,: '. ~:r;" ,:, r. ,',: 11:/":'::" ...." ~~ ~ ;::: , ,. .11 to:..~:; ~':.:' ':'. " ! .~ I. I.... '.' ,. Ite111 # 8 .' 1 \ I 1 j \ I .1 i i I i " } :. 'C3' 1"1 " i . \ r :r ~ II .Cf~ Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum 8 Item .: rl~!~~~ Meeting Date: ift;<".IS""'~'.'#~1 1~!~~;}\JJ.~::H;~~~?t.~~~!.J~1~u SUBJECT: Variance to the Sign Regulations; 3130 Gulf to Bay Blvd..; Emro Marketing Co./Speedway; Subway (Owner/Applicant); Todd Pressman (Representative). (SV 96-12) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Deny the following variances: (1) an area variance of 62.5 square feet from the permitted 64 square feet to allow a total of 126.5 square feet of attached signs, (2) a variance of six attached signs to allow a total of eleven attached signs, and (3) a variance of five signs to allow eight signs of the same type (canopy signs), on property Identified as Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 24.07, for failure to meet Sec. 45.24, Standards for Approval, Items (1 )-(4). II and that the approprIate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: . This property is located on the north side of Gulf to Bay Blvd., between McMullen Booth Rd. and Bayshore Blvd., and is In the General Commercial zoning district. e The applicant is requesting the following variances: (1) an area variance of 62.5 square feet from the permitted 64 square feet to allow a total of 126.5 square feet of attached signs, (2) a variance of six attached signs to allow a total of eleven attached signs, and (3) a variance of five signs to allow eight signs of the same type (canopy signs). . The variances are requested primarily for the purpose of Identifying a Subway sandwich shop which will be located within the Speedway convenience store. Rovlowed by: If..(.',~ft:rr..;<:''''j'''<$.r}.'~w(.' ,J.?g~JJ.~~~p~~~~m:.~~~J.,.":..;,,.~,,:.~ Legal m;~;A((f" 'A;,?:,,,,PU ::4~i&<H,;~~:m:~..P.lli'm~g.t:;,hi::5, .. ~; ;~:E~ :=;zEi ~~~7rdtZ1! IS }~%~~ft{~.N/A:~~~~~~~~~1f.: ACM r#~MW:'.'.. .. ..' '~... CRTI~"~~; I.II[~:I Cost.: Total Comml..Jon Action: o Approved o Approved w/Condltlon. D Denied o ContInued to: i~:~i1r~.:~rrw:~r:J~H~rttNJA{ n~r1J0~?-lili~ir~r]jiillil Currvnt Flleel V..r Funding Source: D c..pltallmp",~lTMnt: D Oper8t1ng: ~h. r. r.!f:1~H;:~;ii~i:i!r:;H~j':i:i1t?!::g:~':1 Attachments: ;:~:AP~.ij~:Jflftj~:~~~;ti.1;~~c~~lt:.~:I~rt} Submitted by: 2.n?:' o Not Required Appropriation Code Application Work,h..t Affected Partie.: IBI Notified o Not Required ~~i~~f~J$H~lltr1ti.~~t~;~i~1~~~f.il~}~~~~~11~~~l~~t~~~~~~:t~~r~~~~JiJ~~5~ M.p. o None . 0 Print.ct on ,.oVcled p.,., SV 96-12 Page 2 The following table provides summary information regarding the proposed signs: :[II~J0ftYJlliIIJldl~i~ti:11JI~J,t,li~li1.i~flj.!~ t.~~~J~Jhll~i~tl~a~~~~ijtilftJi~lJi::t{~:i~~f@ ::];:~;;i1:ftjf.l~1~j~rUf.~.tfim[{~~'~~jifWjf*~t Type of signs Attached Yes LocatJon/orientatJon of signs Gulf to Bay Blvd. Yes Area 1 26.5 sq. ft. 64 sq. ft. Number of attached signs 1 1 signs* 5 signs Number of signs of the same type I 8 canopy signs 3 canopy signs *The eleven attached signs are: one neon window sign @ 1.5 sq. ft., two USubway" wall signs @ 27 sq. ft. each, one logo canopy sign @ 11 sq. ft., one uSpeedway" canopy sign @ 46.5 sq. ft., , and six logo canopy signs @ 2.25 sq. ft. each. Staff Comments: Conditions do not support approval of the requested variances: . Approval of the variances would set a poor precedent. Increasingly, businesses are sUbleasing a portion or portions of floor area to separate business entitles or proprietary Interests. Allowing signs beyond the code limit to advertise these occupants may produce cluttered storefronts. . The variances are not minimal. They are approximately double the code allowance. . Approval of the requested variances will detract from the appearance of the neighborhood. Direction Existing land Uses North Condominiums South Clearwater East Sewer Treatment Plant East Fraternal organization West Offices .. SV 96-12 Page 3 Applicable Variance Standards: To be eligible for a variance, a request must meet all four standards for variance approval. Based upon review and analysis of the Information contained in the application, staff finds that approval of the requested variances does not meet the standards. In particular, the following standards do not appear to be fully met: 1. There are special circumstances related to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions applicable to the land or buildings, and such circumstances are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to the land or buildings in the applicable zoning district. 2. The strict application of the provisions, of the code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or buildings. 3. The variance is not based exclusively upon the desire for economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner. 4. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the land development code and comprehensive plan and will not be materially injurious to surrounding properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Relevant Previous Decisions by the Commission: NUMBER OF ATIACHED SIGNS %9:?~~K~s~.~~:it$f;:to:(.~~~ W~M'~~~~'~~~:~':~'~~~~'~{f..~x:';:~:;:.;~~~:: ::'J.~~:>~~~~~r~;~~:q~.~~ ~;:1~:.~~~f.t~~~~::x:$~:..~::.~.~:~y.~;~.:;::~~::~::::~r~.%~.::.~:!.~.~~.~~ ~::~:...~::::~ ;i::<::::(t~:::.:::-;:.\~::~~.;.':.):~:~;;;{~.}:.~:~.;:::~~l:<~.~~::}?;:::~::.~:X~~~:{.l~:.:;:;. )~j~f?'~:,::.};j.~~~::~.;~:~;-t:;~.~,~j~[:~1;.~~~~:?' "bA:SEt'i(''''': '{;. '{~DtiRES'St"';~;;lf:lx,' .i. N'AME. ~'i':"",,<,,:;:~,:-,:z';":\'~'[''''~~''''';':':'''';':.,::~:.:.:;<,: ';'VARl'ANCES"":"~':"':'o<:':w;'",,"':X:''':::<;,,:,;:: "'MEerrlNG:<~':<xwv SV 93-60 603 Missouri Ave. Clearwater Outboard 4 attached signslDenied 4 window signs/ Approved 3/21194 SV 95-09 1520 McMullen Booth Rd. SV 95-31 387-1/2 Mandalay Ave. Musicana Dinner Theatre 3/16/95 Wedgwood House Estate Jewelers 7 attached signsl Approved 5 window s;gnsl Approved 1 wall sign/Approved 8/17195 I I I. SV 96-01 500 Cleveland St. SV 96-09 1295 Albertson's Inc. i Missouri Ave. Church of Scientologv 211/96 1 wall sign/Approved 616/96 I' i, SV 96-12 Page 4 A IT ACHED SIGN AREA I -- 1&.~1I1 riil1iI1!~1t1 ~~"M'EETiN(}"./~~;/).:.;:i;;', ;" , >".... ..-:".", ~ ..-:........... iy;.?)"< r """)~:;;yiyWJ~t;:!i:Ji~ .' DATE..................,.... ;'<: '. ..... ....;..-:-.....".. .:::-<::::,::: :.~~~}:::;::~;::~:!;::::;.:.:~; SV 93-73 2200 Gulf to Goodyear Auto 136 sq. ft./Denied 1 119/93 Bay SV 93-37 20505 U.S. 19 Burdines 185/185 SQ. ft./Denied 1/24/94 SV 93-39 20505 U.S. 19 Dillard's 21.26 sq. ft./ Approved 4/19/94 SV 92-90 423 East Shore Olympia Motel 51.6 sq. ft./Denied 4/27/94 SV 94-26 1 10 Island Way Island Estates 8.8 sQ. ft./ Approved 8/4/94 Realty SV 94-35 2907 S.R. 590 Johnny's Italian 8 sq. ft./ Approved 1 1/3/94 Restaurant SV 95-32 1801 Sunset Majik Market 28.4 sq. ft./Denied 7/20/95 Pt. Rd. 16 sq. ft.1 Approved SV 95-31 387-1/2 Wedgwood House 1 1 .5 sq. ft./Approved 8117/95 Mandalay Ave. Estate Jewelers SV 95-38 1284 S. Art Warehouse 64 sq. ft.1 Approved 917/95 Missouri SV 95-39 241 1 1 U.S. 19 Roval Pools 95.6 sq. ft./Denied 9/21195 SV 95-40 2170 Gulf to Albertson's 192.3 sq. ft./Denied 10/5/95 Bay 81 .5 sq. ft.1 Approved SV 95-42 2530 McMullen Northwood Plaza 12.5 sq. ft./ Approved 10/19/95 Booth and Republic Bank SV 96-05 1 501 N. Long Center 83.3 sq. ft./Approved 3/7/96 Belcher SV 96~O6 400 Mandalay Daub/etree Resort 155 sq. ft./Approved 3/21/96 Surfslde VARIANCE WORKSHEET - CASE NUMBER SV 96-12 STANDARDS FOR VARIANCE APPROVAL (1) There are special circumstances related to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions applicable to the land or buildings, and such circumstances are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to the land or buildings in the applicable zoning district. (2) The strict appUcation of the provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or buildings. (3) The variance Is not based exclusively upon the desire for economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner. (4) The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the land development code and comprehensive pran and will not be materially Injurious to surrounding properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. STAFF FINDINGS . Approval of the variances would set a poor precedent. Increasingly, businesses are subleasing a portion or portions of floor area to separate business entitles or proprietary interests. Allowing signs beyond the code limit to advertise these occupants may produce cluttered storefronts. . The variances are not minimal. They are approximately double the code affowance. . Approval of the requested variances will I detract from the appearance of the neighborhood. Placement of signs in accordance with the sign code will not deprive the applicant of a reasonable use of this property. Absent any conditions unique to this property, it appears that the variances are based primarily upon a desire of the applicant to secure a greater financial return from the propertv. The sign regulations were adopted with the intent of enhancing the visual quality of the City's streets and landscape in order to protect the value of properties and the well- being of the local tourist oriented economy. The granting of these variances appears to be in violation of this intent. - .8 I sv# qs-@ CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT . " .. '.\ ..' :-..1"\; i\ 10 S. MISSOURI AVENUE . \",.~', r~\lLJ71'"' ~'. .,,\:. ~ ,_.,"Jr., CLEARWATER"~FL"34616 1'..\f_.J\~i'" 1-. \. j,,'I. \:\.1~:'~.\:,~ .. I' .......-1 " . · 1 'i ....) :.. ":.~O:.D~~ L &;17~.~:~$'.IGN. 'VARIA.~:CE~~P,P:~(6J\TIR'~~"': . ~.~,..~., ,', '~~:'.~;:.:~' _.:- PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME & ADDRESS: . ''':''~''''REPRESENT~TIVECS) '(If any)"NAME'&'AODRESS:' .. ~.... ~/. ~' ,,_,'~'I ,."':-... -I. ~~/J ..0 .). - r~ . .ro~., r::'h~ .' "'-", ".'.'. " ./bQu....)n-s..;r.lfAt;j -,.' _0:.'" ,S~. '-' ..'"-., . _'~~~:>"S"/'t~ ~".ob~' Sft/((~W I ~(' . :.c - -~. 11, - y. ~/' .. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: NAME OF BUSINESS (IF APPLICABLE): t:~~ 71~; .' \..; ; . 'TELEPHON!=: ,'( ~~ ) "'. 80y 7Jl-%~3. dUd. . .' . . TELEPHONE: (511.,. '6('/- ?dO-O . . , . 0. 76 AG(~ LAND AREA:~ .. ~.. ;",. t......~ ~:' . .,. ..~ . .~... .. ~ ..., , "...\: ....\\'..... .~ ."", Z~,~~~.~I~;RIC~,.:(f '. i!: .~ND ~SE ~~;~I~IC~TIO~~,~..;,=~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF"UBJE rPROPERTY~: '\ PARCel NUMBER: [ 6 I ;)q , I t b I tttVo I J L{ () I 0 ZOt? (This Information is available from your tax rocelpt or contact Pinellas Co. Property Appraiser's ~4-3207. If more than one parcel number, attach 8~ x 11 Inch sheet) DESCRIBE SURROUNDING USES OF PROPERTY: . .' North: R4~ IDf ( . SC?uth.: . ~1f4. East: West: alU~ ( (;~L1Itt~v('cw I . VARIANCE(SI REQUEST: ----A: (/L1 V"t ~(l (. ('f.,L f {. "E: · (Jr ~~~{ (~f~(V~ ~ Yr~ - iA'<ldu~l /.. {On. 5 :; S"<i, 4'''-.d ". ~ 'f. ~((~J .~ .; ~ 5Iftt,.S \, ~'" ',', _ .:_.. t 't, ~'I ", J ' CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL: A variance ahall nDt be grDllted by the City CommIssIon unloss the application and evidence presentod clearly support the following conclusIons: 1) ntoro oro spoclal circumstances related to the particular physical surroundIng., shope or topographical condltlDns ' eppUcoble to tho rand or buildIngs, end such clrcum.lances ere pectd'or to such 'and or buJldlnQB and do, not applv generolly to tho Jand or bulidl~gs In tho appUcablo zoning district because M~~ ~'" 0.;1 "~lAe.. ~~'f br),'-k,"/'J-"& 'Yt J ~~~"J qv-e. ~c/. 1lt~ /~ nl5'~ ~ k..'U~$'i' lvr~~~1 ~ is ~t:~, ~lk<fie h~/'=tc--1::7 y;,l).,i.,~~.~..o.~~ ~~~ ~:~ a-,y ~u ~~~/1w - tel 'i~ _ ($ uc-Lu ~V"A:I. 2) The strict' appflcotfon 0 iElo'provlslons ofW'ttfe code, woUld deprive tho op Ucant of the reesonable use of tho lond or buildings because ... (. , 3) 4) The granting of tho variance will be In harmony with the genorol purpose and Intent of the land development code and , comprehensIve plan and will not be materially Injurious to surroundIng properties or other. Ise detrimental to the public welfare becauso ,... .;, " \ " , . " THIS SUBMISSION GIVES AN APPLICANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST THE VARIANCE AND APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION AT A PUBLIC HEARING. FEES PAID ARE NON.REFUNDABLE REGARDLESS OF BOARD ACTION. BY SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT I AM ACKNOWLEDGING THAT ALL FEES PAl NOT GUARANTF.E APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. 1,;.$ ~ ~ ~ ~E""'. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER lOR REPRESENTATWEl:'~M ~ <L ~I'( ~e. f\nolud. ~kJon Md rwrn' of mpM'\Y It "PPIloNiI.) j Swom to and subscribed before me thIs by rr;1. rf f/;e5 5"1Mb If pt2,e:St'>na.LC( K1J7-d17 -1-0 m f 8S Identification. .1?Lw:ud~ \ ~ \.(1)2-.{).tjl,a/ Notary Public ...3 _ day of / ' ::r (ft..'YJ e-, A.D.. 19 '9 t;: . who Is personally knowr. to me and/or has producod STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF ..f!.t ,';1 {J .,.U ~ . Commission No. (Nama of 0 GERTRUDE B. DEV~ ,..~ Notary PubHc, Stale 01 Flondll 1Ml. 8lPlrOS MaV 21. t 999 No. CC451809 BondId TIru eftltlal )1'....111.5.111;,. 1. 800 723-ot21 NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST AlTf.ND HEARING. ... .. t ,~'., "" . .' : ~..'. . . " . n ~, '.';' " i-. . , JUN-27 96 15:20 FROM:HODUSA,TOWERS 7963975 To:a13 462 6476 PAGEl 02 -I PRESSMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. . Governmental Affalra and Public ReIottom H B M 0 TO: Steve Doherty FROM~ DATE: 6/27/96 , RE: SV 96-12 '>.; "-' With our extreme discussions. I am subm1ttina the following revised variances: 1) A variance of 55.75 S.F. to allow a total of 119.75 S.F. of attached signsge. ,2) A variance of 3 attBched signs eo allow a total of 8 attached signs. 3) A variance of 2 canopy signs to allow a toea! of 5 attached signs of the same type. " Pleas~ call me directly with Qny questions or concerns, Thanka, for your continued attention and patienee with this request. . ',.. .'. :' ',' .!' ~ ',,- c , . .... . 'J'" " , . , . I . . 28870 US Highway 18 N.' BUlta Uoo. CluMI',r, PL 34ea1 Phonl 81S.72e.VQTE (lUlU). fiX .'S.78l1.3Q75. Plglr 1.000.88..8..... ~. .. " .._,.I.I..~...................'" , ._.c .... .w~ '''''''~.''' ... ..."... ~ .... j. "'.....,. ..'. .. . ",,,,"" <. < ......~ . " , .. " :, \. ," '~; ',.. '~\: . . ~ .: > . .I:.' , '. I., , , ;'t:< ' ; ~:.' . . . ~ -. t~. l' ."', > :::.J:, .- ,<' "/,",' .~ .! . '.(' ;:,}-:i;:, ' .', ' , , ; ~. ',' : ~~ . . '. I ~~. I' ~ j". . '.:;I:.'~ :'J' :. ,.., < '''j)\ t, . (. ,', " ' l. . . .. ~ I I PRESSMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC~. Governmental AffaIrs and Public Relallons F A X T R ^ N S MIS S ION, .p' TO: Steve Doherty ,. ", FROM: Todd Pressman " ',' i \ , , J , , , " ' I, DATE: 6/21/96 # Pages. including this coye r sheet: Just This In regard to Speedway, at Gulf To Bay and McMullen, they will remove the' large white beer window sign" and 2 neon beer window signs. ,They want ~o keep the three "S(t log~ signs on the Canopy poles. I'll be ,sending a check, and I think it is still $100.001 Thanks. , ' " o ~ ag ~j-~:lrm JUN2 4 l~IJJJ elf{ OF el.f: ~il, '.1n[R _ __....~.._~4_..."......-....... ...._ , 28870 US Highway 19 N. · Suite 1#300 · Cloarwater, FL 34621 Phone 813~726-VOTE (8683). Fax 813-796-3975. Pager 1-800.864-8444 ..,'"" ..~~ .... ~ ....-.. . .. ',(". , .' ,\' I,' '.. . ~ , I <...... .", . "",1 , , ": 'j' " " .,' . .' , ::~. . , .'~ . ~I . I,:' .~.~ ." '. .\:~ . I I :~:!,,: 1:',,>; , ,. .'), -: '<):;,' lr~;. . >,':',:' I .J',' . 'I:/~ ' "11 " .~~, . " ~. t . I'". .' . '.. i.,; '~ . :1".' . . ~'~ d . I . i :~~::" '" .il', "~ I i,:'/: ',' I",' :';>" " I ~ ~.:;~. ~ . . '.....J :' ':1. '" l.:y..... ,.' . 1/': " , , :~~. I' ~ l ~ '. ,'1- ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > .. \ , i May 24~ 1996 , , J ,To the City of Clearwater: Emro MarketIng Company Easfern DMslon P.O. Box 1500 Sprlngfleld. Ohio 45501 500 S~edway Drive Enon, OhIo 45323 Telephone 513-864-3000 , , Please accept this as permission for Pressman & Associates. Inc.. to represent sign variances at '~ur two (2) locations in P,ineUas County. Sincerely, ? tt J,( J. A Davidson Vice President. Eastern Division JAD:reb State of Ohio ) I ) ) ,County orClark Subscribed and sworn to be~ore me this :24th day of May, 1996. , My Commission expires: April 21, 199~. ~ &~~~ Signature SPEEDWAY STARVIN' MARVIN UNITED A Marathon Subsidiary BONDED GASTOWN CHEKER I i i \ r I ! 1 j , \ i I i I ! WAKE UP An Equal Opportunity Employer , ~ , . r-.,~I[II' )~ \ \.-~....--"- ..- ii2 '- - ~~ " ~ ---" ~,.. '7 . A · t! i - i~1 I; I , i I- I I .- -- q..--"-'- \.V -_.,----- -=-----:>- J"j:tarVI!1 'Ar~. -"iM 'ii;~. ... ; I If) ~ t:b L. " l~-:"-::\"~.n-pI'lr.!7'\"'l;o;~~~''''''''''''-'--'- - "..." I r.' " . ,;.,(',~~~,v~':'-:>,r"-'!;''':'''' ,;..," ,'. ~~-:'H"'-;~"--'''''''''''''-r1 ,:'" . _*:_( .;; ::':)/:";y:. .' ..... . . . 'i.'.;::':,:.. .:. ):.; ( " ' . f' ~ I t _.,3p"dwty : i , ~p~~ ~ ., ij I " tiCf t ~~ i t61 1 I , i I I I I 'I II I- I ~I r. !~ I' f - Ii j- q l- n Ii I! II - ~ ::: ! . I ; . " ! ---- --"-.-"-1 -------.----.1 ~ ,',-,i. s . : :.:". ~ ~~ :.Jf .' ..~t t t . I , \ o I! .i- - f .....L!! . (').~ . I , '-..- I L I 'I .,. ~ .. .. .~. ... .~.. \. .- ~~ ~.... ..,..: t .', I.... , t! J~~ J ~. I 1- ~ 0 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ I ~~ 'l> ~ ~ ~ ~r'\ ~~' ~r. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ &\ ya: 1 - . ~ i if ~ ~ 't-.." '7'- 1/:' .. ~ f~~ ~ ~ ~lt~ . n. l~ i~ ... ~ ~~ ~ ~ r K~ ~~ a~~ .' ~j ~ '-.:'., t ~ r~ ~Ii :t '1 .~~ ~~ ~~~ . -' J tl 1M I ~~ '1\-: 1 ~ ~ {. I~ . ' '\. .. 0 - ,'to , '\ \ , " . . . , . < < . .... . ' ':' . . ~ I ' , i i. : ; , ! ' , .... . .:,.' ',' . ..,. . ~ .... . .,;'1 . i . ..... i , ., :'. . , . . ,~ 41,"! " . ',' ~. I . :~" ',". . ~~'I . " '"t:l" :. f < :;: :.' .' ~ . '_ f, I < ' < , ' , ". .', \, " " ~,;' . ~ . ,', .! c ,', ..~ ~~ ' , ~J , .l s , ,-:~' , ~~ p~ ft 1>> ~~ w~ J~ 41 , I ~ > ',.' .." (ii. p~. n~ .-1 '. ' . , . ' , , .. ':J " , . , " '- f, "., . I r't . I J -0 r I I I ... : ~f ~1 ~, ..... I $~! ~{ I i I i I 1 I .' , " 4 .~. 4 ~ . ~ . ,'. ~-..:~ ~ " I, I' I t . . ~ I I .. .. .... ~ J . .... ---.....- - .:;.---~....~~......- f "t,' " . y ~ - :. <. <:1 I I -- I ~ t '$, I 'F'. : e. . ~. . ~ , ,r-~ , .., "t' ":' fi , ';'\9) II ... :m , ~ '~i -- , I ,. " r i f . i i I \ , f I .. . I'- ... ----...... .........--- . . . . : ~ '1 I, : 'i' "'. .... l..' "';':.:? ,.. , .p".'" ~'~.. . '.~I.. ~. -;.. : ':'ll. .... '\ ..)..~... .... ,,,, "j1 .-t..., .' \' .,.. "'.l ;. . ~ " .J .. t ~-t ~ ~~ . , r . -.....;...: .' . _ri~r .. 'II '1/i.1~,~1 ~ ..- '.,.. 111" -t.. "'\~. , . .1-''''>-.~ .....r . . :' '"'=' ~I..:..~..: . ' " .. .. e _ ; :~:;, ;f~.itr' , . .' '. 'l';"i .r~~:c;. .' . ". - ~ ':;~ ...~ ..' ~ ~ . ~':~<~r:";. . ...... ,., V ~. "t~ .. .' ....,. , c. ~, : <+' , ~..}:, :'~., :. "'/ ~ ~ . I"':" :.. .... :', ... "' ",. 'n>' ~>)' . ::'J';... ',.i, ~~i\.:" , ': ..~. ..... ~~>~::.. , ,- \."..... J ~ ; -.'. ,...; '. .I'p ,; " ,." -',-/,. ~':". , , ;" ~;c . . . " iY ~ .; :>:~ :~'.~'; I ~ri., '.P '~ :. ':/' \ .)"~: ;;-'.; I:,.,,' ".C, ;~.. :~. t. ~. .." ..- ~... ;0 ~ '.' 'I, . ~ ':""," , . . '. . .. "" ~:~"'. ",. . -.. . ..' ;.. ~.... ..', *, .... " . ,: ~"'i :.~ ~ j '. ': :0 '. ~ ,,' 4 .. , ' " "'t'J ~ ~( " '" .~. I . I i. t I I j' l '.., , , , ; ,... " ..t , ....'\"'.....:'" ,." Ii '~.;' .. " . ~ . crc 00 l'- N '. " , , , . . Ii.. " ~ . 1 ! . I 1 t 1 f j t f l 1 l , . I i \ I , i .. 1 I . J . . . , . n 4lJ "" ~ C't', : ;. - lb ,0001:I:l--L....1. ! t~EO~"~1~ I A; .~ . " . ~tJ \i; . . ; . : . ...- . i . '~. .! II 'b <- .' t. a, \2 I , . (.~ II- r i :1,; t 1'." OJfVOI ,~ r . ~.. .. . .. ~~ r r ;..~ ~ 3 ~~ .,' 00';;1 ~. ~ . ~-- ......-- -.... .. .. - -- - -",-L.\.'~ 1M' n.. ...- ....,.-.. (Iii: lr.)J lEGe;;.li$t "OvOtl H100I " f " - S3NlVH - -' +...~' '. ........../. . . 300 ,.. 9 ~ .. _~ Ft ~ D' Yf.NJNG" (X]l..IH,T :,,:~ R S _8 E AYE DG]~ rrER~~AC'~ :~ i1" ~2 ,'.,3" a 4,.: tI~ 1a_6:t7 8 0 9 W)8~:t7~ ~6a ~ 5;;; :fl./ fG3",,~.2 :' li f;, , .. ' JJ ' It '~Ii ~ ~;;;;;; ~ 1; .!L ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~.. ~ ~ .- I~' ':: ,\' DowNING' I, "'" ~t 1\/ SlREET4'" ~ .!. lO II. ~ ~. ft .. , . J,. CO;;.,.. ~ .,~ CO ~s ;g ~ ~~::6 ~t ~ It) ~ ~ - ~ .. a: Ii I; ~ J3 it ,11 en (;) ~ b; ;; ti ~ ;; j;j ~ Pi .~ 0 18 17'..16' 1~ ,\4: Cl)13 '12 tUI) 10 ~1flIJ uit '3 12 \1 10,2 u <2:: I(tf , .cUtl >' . a: 2 3-? 9 a: i!'t.l 0 82 ~ 69 -66 z ~17-~ _ _ - 1W ~ us ~R~\~ i"o;;J; m :!HI ~ ~ /' trf t'1 tU (1227] ~, 23$ o 1I~~ ~ %'6!!.!.. .-// ~I _~ 233 ~ ~ 'CllA.RWA.Tl'K _ ~-r;:' I LLI I r~ ) i 1::'~ .,,24-04"""""'q' ,,~~/O~ H ~i I r:Y"i, ~ ~ /' I\V ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~",,,,,,,,'1#~8': : ~s~u I ~ EJ....., I."....,...~ ,R 24 )9 R , 377 ~ Pi eo I r /~ I 121!) ~'\)49 :: 2~/05 ~ 24/06 !l 24/07 ~ N/08 C ~ ' ~~ ~ _ -' !L=-=_~,__R_ _-::_= _GULF !~~~ ~!3L~, '______~__ ~.;.~O--CENrr -< ~~;e ~ DR~:~' ~ 0 ~ ~~~1ro;\ ~~I ~ ~ ~ c\ CLEARWATER EAST ~~~7 I I I ; \ <-:> OJ SEWER PLANT 1 m - 1('" ' \ / ("""\ P ,,/'.~ JA. I..J _. ~ ' _~:__ J nTY ~~:'''' " ,..: _ ,.~_...",.,.........~~,~~-:-.~ ~ ~~ I ...--! ____,~ ~t7(~~"~~fl~j .......,"~~ . '~-..-. ~ ~~' 1. 1 t4 ~.., ~ . ~. ~ .. t. ~:;" j:? ......i::,...~:.~:; . ~ -!t '~'I"I' '.... ~y- .t.~, ,,;,~,. I'" hrn.~~ , , ' ...'f;"i!1,~~~;~: :\~, ~, :1\;"'" ,,,',.:: :,:~.t~~-" ':1 s,,, ,~~,' . ~", ",' " ~F'~~ :")~~l:2 .~-::. JS!; If~71~~~~~:ll~ik.,~~:~:;atl",~: : ~;;~', :i!~~'~;' .~ '. .;~~~,~~ ):'1~~"~ '.:i, ~J~'!: ,i.;r;t:: ~~';9~' ~~~,'5r'~~~ ,,- , L"~_~r.~...,ft . -~ ~.~. .'., . .~~ . ...~;~...';;l[,.- ;~. '~.' , \4:M"" ~!.:e- ' -'~ fl:~;l~ ,~,~... " ~.:J~''''''", '-.,.., ~'J . Ii' ,t,., . ~ -. '~'I v..e:, ;;'~t. . 'f';.,' ~.- ~'" ...!.:-' "&i~...',~" 5~#";' ":".:# ~~~:- ( >f ~~' , ~ r ' .... ,,__',~':.'...~~.:-,;:'~ .. .._;.II" '.' -~;t; f-+.~.~ \.''''''t ......~ ~..s 9 ,"f ;;:: .'cf~~M J'~ .;-s-. ;:.1 ,'.j . ..~ l ,.. 11..~ r c" .' j \7t.l..!_ . ..,...-i......~, W'""t~"_, ...."-.......oIf...n~~.4 )J..-L~ :~. _ _.J ~ =;... .,. 'If..... :....... _.....,I...,,~ ....~..........J. 2 ~./3 <II Z3P ~9 2<17 245 .. , I ---..I ,I 9 200~ * I I .~ ~ ~ 15.'; oD \.~E 7lJ-290..... rOR'S .NOR '-64 )-lS8~ }fOJ 31/01 () I' 1""",""lt1k\~~I$I{J~I~~If.t.?:i~i!~ig~ij:if;~trTh{~~9:&IM~m~;&:~![i~fiQ~~]wt~ili?[fv.\lt\~b~I~~ti;1t~~0ii;3}rll~("lfj~~);~t0~jjf;:-)~' NAME: SV # 96-12 ATLAS PAGE: 292A fMRO MAllKEnNG CO. / SPEEDWA YfSUBWA Yl / PRESSMAN PUBLIC HEARING DATE : JULY 18, 1996 SEe: 16 lWP: Z9. S RGE: .1.6 E ~)~ '~t~};*t*V;~~~ff~~{~f,";}i8r;.}~~~~1~1.~#~W~*Q~1V'~~~~1r~~i\~~~;)1~~~~'~:{:rqJo~~.:i..-c;'.. ~~1~~ ~){>~1t~t:)~~ ~~.:~((-t.I~i )t...~< ~~:'~~~A}Wi~~~~~~9f.:~'(~t~~~~N~~fl:~:t1~~;.t~\~~.:;~;~~~~~t~~~~;~\~\(ft~.?~~ ~::: :O~:~; ~ ~l~~:.""+~."<" >....~:../~.t:"....:/...'."..;.>.:.-:... ;}~:~ ;'~(~"";~-::"::'~fj,:.t"~'~"i~~..f.:~~'~'<:~ CLEARWATER '" ..~,:~ COMMISSION a\:t:~..(~. t ~ ~ ...:,(~ ......,,1'...':-1. t~.~~,~.:..;..,:t. ~'~~$~ ;c:,~}:~\~~~..~:t*.(.";l\~"'~/~,"'J" ~.-;~~..p.... .~..~~~}. ;:~~t~~'~V~!~{t~~~r:..:;.tt<%~~t~6?:::f:'~~.i:0::~~7!~j,:~~~x':.\:~ ~;~;,,\;~;~~';':j~(~:;. . .. . .'~... h. .. . <.... . .... ,n,. .'. .'. .'. "~~";:'" c.., . . ...... .~~}::\:;:.~ .::~:~~~.::)~~~...~-:,\.:~::':..:.;#....\.i..:'::~~.K~:~H~':~..~:i<;?l.~~t({~~:r~}':."f.:;~tr .' at o fie t ~ ~ II) ;: Q J 'OlI Hl_ HJlYWI\n--- W j ~ = I Q I i i \ 00 -r""'l ~ I ! au "OW 00... 'OW W)K)1lI Q 'llIf lOOlJI , ! c; I II I~ t 11 OJ; '01 :lIf)Jll i i 0 ;: <:::::JJ ~ I 'llO ]lfV'l ')f.y YOlllly~ 'I..... ~.T~ ~ ~ ~ylQlCll.~ J-Y_ SllNrlI i I " 0: .. .. B ')f.Y:l1*IYa-.. JIN1 I' ~." 'l1V ~, . ')f.Y i Ii I i ~ 0 6 Q 0 ~ op oj pu-tto ;;- ~, 7;;- j " P,e;)'" ~ . j ....~~.... , '... " l):l ..., " ...... ~ wi ~ "" tt~J fI. ~Q 0 i' I: '->' .1. .~"l" . . ) ..1' ,'I , " l:.:'_~ ,', ~.. . .:':. , >\ :' ;, " . . .. ~ .' . , .. ,.1'. .;' ,~.f. . . ;", .1: , ,. " , .~, '.:. ..', ;: " ~ ~;\~, .: . e, , '~.L ; I' t, .- ' ~..., 'I, . I I R e.cv re. ~' PRESSMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. --'" Governmental Affairs and Public Relations SIGNAGE GUIDE SUBWAY/SPEEDWAY WALL SIGNAGE VARIANCE A: Existing Neon Window Sign, 1.5 S.F. B: Switched-out"Subway" wall sign, 27 S.F. c: Newly Proposed "Subway" wall sign, 27 S.F. 'D: Existing Can,oPY "Speedwayll sign, 11 S. F . E: Existing Canopy llSpeedway" sign, 46.5 S.F. I t l !. J I , F: 6 logo Canopy signs, 2.25 S.F. each ~ 1 ; i J , 1 J ~ , \ j I I ! I' j I 1 .' 28870 US Highway 19 N.. Suite '300 · Clearwater. FL 34621 Phone 813.720.VOTE (8683). Fax 813.796.3975. Pagor 1.000.864.8444 ..,.t~ . '\~:I~'~'\' '. .\:~'. , .~!.. ~,"', :; ~~~.~. :.:. "'. ~.{". ~...' 'V,'/$", ''''''. _ , ,:-.f. ,;. t;!i. . .1; .7:,;- ;;j. . , ..1y:.~ T~.' ' ~t":'< I;!'., _.' '~n..." 1;..:\-..,..~ ';..!'f:.;,;~,'" . ~~~ ~~~;~: ~~~. ~.,. ;f,~~:"'" ' :!t,.....;. .,;..,.... ':,.0,. 'j..';'- I ~ -t ..~ -"t' ,: :" ,', ~'11":~:.?'~i: :~ ;; _,;..:f;tr," '. ,)"~.;...,, . " ~...~~i !::;,.~~:;'-'I~~t' r .' ~~ ~~ '.'i~"; ~~.:""~h1' ~~.. ~")ri'. ....~ ..:\ 0' I . .~:'" ' . ~Jt'~. f.: r~,<<6"p>-;. .~t} . !':,::~ 'I '..;.{ I :', I ,,' I , ," i 4.J .! c:: ; 1.;:/ ~tul ; .-{ V~.~~ I :..... . ...,'1. . ... r :. oi'.' t.~ I ,,:::_' :;} ,10 ,- ". '{A-i :, . '1 ':';:':' ~ " . t .k. '.. 4 .~ :. ~ , . i: I : .'.0'. 1!.,1~ J~.J:;1- ~:J.~. .,.~h, \'" \~: .' '. ., . : p' t~ : .~. ~\ c': ( ~:'. l'~"" ,::: /~ ~', '.~ [" '"I' r' ~'I 1:.:!J ~ ,I ("f II ; t J t: ., .. , '.I:;~'~'~'.:': 1 ~,),'\ '::;':I:::~:': ',<:~ if " :', "'. 'iJ t . ":':'/~~ 1 - ., i)~ ..:,;~. -~ tfl ." '" '7~- IWJ1I . -= t' I (' 6 ij ~,J 1\ I .~ \ ,\ . j. . cfi Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum 9 ,....,.....,.....,", v ,'.. .' . ,... ;" ~. ......... -: ."".. : ."" c '\,n . ......c. .,'" ." ,- " .. '". ."." ..... . Item II: r''::':: ;:::';':J:":: <>,~.,,:'i: Meetlng Date: [,@:::,~, 1 \5':~~; . .... :.'-{ SUBJECT: land Development Code amendment to allow car rental uses as a conditional use in the Beach Commercial and Resort Commercial 28 District. (LDCA 96-13l RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION: Approve Land Development Code amendment allowing car rental in the Beach Commercial and Resort Commercial 28 District and pass Ordinance No. 6062-96 on first reading. IJ and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: Several property owners on Clearwater Beach recently submitted the attached letters to the City ,requesting car rental uses be allowed within the Beach Commercial District and Resort Commercial 28 District. This issue was last considered by the City Commission on January 19, 1995. (See attached minutes.) In response to these property owners, City staff prepared an ordinance which proposes to allow car rental uses as a conditional use in the Beach Commercial District and Resort Commercial 28 District, and identifies standards for approval of car rental uses in the aforementioned zones. In addition, staff has identified a need to make other amendments pertaining to outdoor retail sales, displays and storage uses: )i;> Specify that, to receive conditional use approval, outdoor retail sales, displays andlor storage must be compatible In scale and appearance with surrounding uses without causIng an undesirable concentration within the vicinity or along a roadway corridor. )i;> Delete the prohibition of temporary buildings, portable buildings, tents, stands, trailers and vending carts in conjunction with outdoor sales, displays or storage uses. )i;> Delete the restriction that outdoor sales in the Downtown/Mfxed Use District be limited to vegetable and fruit stands. Reviewed by: LD--:-\ OrigInating Department: Costs: CommissIon Action: Logol CENTRAL PERMITTING o Approved Budget N/A 55 Totlll o Approved w/Condltlon. Purchll.lng N/A User Depurtment: o Denied RI.k Mgm1. N/A Current Fiscal Year o Continued to: IS N/A Funding Source: ACM ~rl o C.pltal hnprovomont: Other . Advortllllld: 0 foJllI. Operatlllg: Dllte: 0 Attachments: ,~ Other: Poper: Ordlnllncll No, 6062.96 Submitted by: [] Not Required Appropriation Code Lecter. 'n .upport cg.:2~ Affected Parties: Mlnutlll 0 Notified o None t3I Not Requited o Printed on recycled pllper ,I. .' ~ , . . ~I 1 t ~ . : . ." -~. . , , . , '. ~ ",' Page 2 'LDCA 96-13 )- Delete the requirement for a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet for outdoor storage in the Downtown/Mixed Use District. )- Delete the contradictory langliage prohibiting outdoor sales and displays of boat and vehicles in the Infill Commercial District. )0 Delete the requirement for a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet for outdoor retail sales, dibjJitlYs anciior storage in the Inflll Commercial District. , , The above staff-initiated changes are intended to streamline code requirements and provide greater flexibility . The Planning and Zoning Board endorsed this ordinance to the City Commission by a unanimous vote on July 16, 1996. :~. . ,', '(:: ~ . " ,I -, ..; I, ~ :-; , '\ .' ,'. .\, . ,.j'. '" . ."" 'j.' ' 'J" . I, .: ;' I' '. ~ ~ , : ~ I: y' ,"1:'. ' ..... , --,---....' .., -" ...... '" ...,.....--". .' " .. '. ..""...... - ........ ",>. ..+ .~,. L '......n.<' ....,.~"'....T~>+~........." .......,.......... .... n..' ." u.. . . {, ORDINANCE NO. 6062--96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTIONS 40.365,40.384,41.053, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ALLOW CAR RENTAL USES AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE BEACH COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND RESORT COMMERCIAL 28 DISTRICT, IDENTIFYING 'STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR CAR RENTAL USES, SPECIFYING THAT CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL OF OUTDOOR DISPLAYS REQUIRES COMPATIBILITY IN SCALE AND APPEARANCE WITH SURROUNDING USES WITHOUT CAUSING AN ' UNDESIRABLE CONCENTRATION OF SUCH USES, DELETING A PROlDBITION OF TEMPORARY BUllDINGS, PORTABLE BUILDINGS, TENTS, STANDS, TRAILERS AND VENDING CARTS IN, CONJUNCTION WITH OUTDOOR SALES, DISPLAYS, OR STORAGE USES, DELETING A RESTRICTION IN THE DOWNTOWNIMIXED USE DIS'IRICT THAT OUTDOOR SALES BE LIMITED TO VEGETABLE AND FRUIT STANDS, DELETING THE REQUIREMENT FOR A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR ..' OUTDOOR STORAGE IN THE DOWNTOWN/MIXED USE DISTRICf, DELETING LANGUAGE PROHIBITING OUTDOOR SALES AND DISPLAYS OF BOATS AND VEI-llCLES IN THE INFILL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND DELETING THE REQUIREMENT FOR A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR OUTDOOR RETA..a SALES, DISPLAYS AND/OR STORAGE IN THE INFILL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Sections 40.365, 40.384 and 41.053, Code of Ordinances, are amended to read: Sec. 40.365. Conditional uses. Within beach commercial districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: '" '" 1ft ". '" I r', au Outdoor retail sales~ displays and/or stora2e ~ rental only). . '" '" . '" Sec. 40.384. Conditional uses. Within resort commercial 28 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: . . '" * '" .u.u Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or stora2e (car rental only). . . . '" . Sec. 41.053. Supplementary standards by category or use. The standards in' this section which apply to the identified category of use shall supplement the general standards of use identified in section 41.052. No conditional use shall be authorized unless detennined to meet all of the standards applicable thereto. . 1ft . . . (22) Outdoor retail sales, displays andlor storage may be allowed within the urban center (core), urban center (eastern corridor), general commercial, highway commercial, ~rtll commercial, commercial center, downtown/mixed use, ~ commercial. resort cpmmercial 28. and limited industrial districts subject to all of the following: (a) The outdoor use shall not adversely affect the community appearance objectives of the city. In particular. all items di!iPlayed shan be compatible with the surrounding land uses in scale and appeara~. without causini an undesirable concentration of such uses within the vicini~ or alooa a roadway corridor. In particular, no tempornry buildings, paRable buildings, tents, stands, trailers, vending carts or like buildings or struotures shall be utilized in oonjunetion with the UGe-;- au In beach commercial and resort commercial 28 districts. only car reQtal operation,; shalJ be allowed under this cate,2OlY of conditional use. ORDmANCENO. 6062-96 2 . , I. " . , ' ~ ;"" . . ! ' . ' ',' " ',' " , ' '~ . " , . , , .~:.' , ! ' i' - ""..'. " .' , (13) In dowfltovmhn.ixed--use districtst outdoor f{llOiJ-ss]es and displays shall be limited to '18getabJe and-fruit stands nnd-~r outdoor storage uses in-dOV/fltownlmixed use distriotst a minimum let size of 30.000 5Eluare feet shall be provided: (-6) In ir.filJ commercial districts, OUtdooF retaikales and displays of beats and vdlioles shan be pr~hibitedt ex-eept f-or '.'ehiele sales approved by the plar.:ung Bfld zomng board as a conditional use. (d) In worll} commer-eial distriC~t a minimum lot 5~ of 30,000 square feet shall be provided for this use. (ee) The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052. Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Sec;tiQJ13. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk , ORDINANCE NO. 6062-96 3 -- ') , " ,.~c J (0 ... \. ':l':-' ".: 'i. ;, ..- ;. <, l...... .~f . '.1 " " , .'\ ," '''. . .' " f !.n :. roJ'~ct5~OW~ fTI!, IJ1) J UN 1 8 '1996 IJ!J , ,\ CITY OF CI.F..~A''''^TEA ..".. -'""" ,........ ~.....""c, ..._...,-.... I \ , I , i \ ".,. . . . . :~r ...' " , .q: . '" " , w .'., ',. ~ :. ., ~ 'I. " . f,' , l' ..1. " ..~ ' , .' ~1;. :,1 " ~'.'. "I,'. 't~;i,:' ,\0., ,. " I , .. I' . ,. ~ . ," , I', April 4, 1996 WiHiam K~ort Bay Bazaar Center P.O. Box 3342 Clearwater Beach, FL 34630 Mr. Scott Shuford Director of Central pennitting P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 Dear Mr. Shuford: Bay Bazaar Center is a shopping center located on Clearwater Beach. Last year, a rental car agency, approached me about the possibility of leasing space in the shoppi ng center. When , we contacted the city, we were told that no more rental car agencies are not allowed on Clearwater Beach. I believe there are currently two rental car agencies on the beach. These 'were "grandfatheredn in years ago. I would like to ask the city to consider a code amendment to this law. I feel it would be a . '/ definite benefit for the tourists on the beach. Please consider making this code amendment ;;tl.. ~L/J William Kebort Bay Bazaar Center i i , , I I I , ! 1 h~Jt@IJ\Wi~~ APR 0 8 1996 Wi CENTRAL PERMITTING CITY OF CLEARWATER " -, II 1; ."t . " , Robert B. Malke Post Office Box 2124 Largol Plorida 34649 (813)584-8350 April 1,'1996 Hr. Scott Schuford Clearwater City Commission 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater~ FL. 34615 Re: Ordinance regulating outdoor business Dear Mr. Schuford: The purpose of this letter is to make a request of the City to reconsider the ordi~ance which presently prohibits the operation of outdoor business including-rental car agen- cies on clearwater Beach. There is a potential need for these types of businesses on the beach. Currently any tourist that is interested in renting a car must either pay for a cab to transport them in to town or wait far too long until one can be delivered from one, of the other rental car locations usual- ly from another beach south of ours or even from Tampa. AdditionallYI with the prospects of higher taxes on the rental cars ,in the county of Billsborough, the demand for cars in Pinellas might increase. Hopefully this issue will be given serious consideration as car rental agencies will provide a convenience to the visit- ing tourist and business executive alike. Thank you. Sincerely, ~{~ , , I REM/tlm \W~@lliltWl[IID ~ APR 0 8 \996 CENTRAL PERM\TflNG ClTV OF CLEARWA TEA March 25, 1996 Mr. Scott Shuford City of Clearwater Central Permitting Department 10 S. Missouri Ave. Clearwater, FL 34616 Dear Mr. Shuford: As you are probably aware, the Best Western Sea Stone Resort & Suites on Clearwater Beach has been leasing a small office to various rental car companies for over 10 years. Your department even issued an occupational license, this year, for that purpose. It has now been brought to my attention tItat this use is no longer pennittcd in our district and because of the failure of one of our tenants to re~new their occupational license some years ago we can not be grand~fathered in. With this in mind, I would like to request that you and your department consider bringing to the city commission a change in land use to our area. The operation of satellite car rental sales offices is of great benefit to the hotel industry on Clearwater Beach. Over 50% of our customers come in by air and many do not have rental car plans until they arrive, or specifically book our facilities, because they can arrive from the airport and have their cars waiting for them at the hotel. The rental car companies do not slore very many cars in our parking lots or even in the beach area. They are more of a sales or a pick-up desk where the customer rents a car and it is delivered for their use. The impact on parking is really never more than a couple of spaces a day. In a time when the tourism industry needs all the help it can get, this is one of those small amenities that makes us a full service resort destination. If I can be of any help to you in this process please let me know. Sincerely, y Daryl J. Seaton President .' I.', i i ~~J;;":~::,:'.:'~' - 'J<:il.:'_:':,~ ~';::, ~.;,'.~..~..... " -!~~:;,.> ',/,',~;~,. J: Sea Wake Resorts, Inc. 445 Harndon OI'ive Clearwater lk!ach, Florida 34630 1813) <<2.6123 Fax (8131<449-1580 Best Western Crystal River Resort 614 N.W, Highway 19 CtyslllJ RNor. AorJda 34428 (904) 795.3171 Fax {9(4) 795.3m~ Best Western Sea Wake Inn 691 S, Gultview Blvd. Clearwater Beach. Flofida 34630 (BI3)443-76~ Fax (813) 461-2836 Best Western Sea SWne Resort 445 Hamdan O'IVG Clearwater Beach, Flotida 34630 (8 I 3}.44 , .17,22 Fax (813) 461.1680 r=o, ReHrvsllonl Cd 1-800-4,44 .19UI 1[E@muw~~ APR 0 '1996 W CENTRAL PERMITTINQ CITY OF CLEARWA TEA DJS:slg - 5.~. Commissioner Thomas requested 8 30-dey continuation of this Item because he had not received input from the Development Code Adjustment Board (DCAB). The City Manager indicated 8 memorandum was Issued. Mr. Shuford reported that DCAB had recommended approval of the proposed ordinance. . . , Mayor Garvey said once the process 'starts, staH must hold applications contrary to this ordinance. Commissioner Thomas questioned if the clock stops once staff prepares 8n ordinance. The City Attorney indicated said, according to case law regarding pending ordinances, a City can refrain from issuing permits based on that ordinance. She did not recommend this law be used casually. Commissioner Deegan thought the City could not use a pending ordinance. The City Manager said the City could use a pending ordinance to deny 8 permit. Commissioner Berfield questioned if that law applies to variances, too. The City Attorney said the City could stop granting permits pending adoption, in the nature of a moratorium. She recommended caution in its US6. Commissioner Thomas said he wished to continue this item for 30 days to review the minutes and conflicting opinions of DCAB and the Planning & Zoning Board (P&.Z). Mayor Garvey referred to Mr. Zinzow's concern that these items are enforced retroactively. The City Attorney said the City could institute an amortization schedule. , Corr."issioner Thomas moved to continue this item for thirty days untiJ February 16, 1995. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimouslv. ITEM #19 - Public Hoodoo & Fjr$t'Reading Ord. 5755-9ti - LDCA re outdoor retail sates, displays, and/or storage in the Beach Commercial and Resort Commercial zoning districts (LDCA)(CP) . Staff has received a request from Jerry Miller to establish a car rental operation on Clearwater Beach. None of the zoning districts on Clearwater Beach currently pelmits car rental operations. ,The City regulates car rentals under the use category of outdoor retail sales, displays, and storage. Existing car rental operations on the beach were established before current land development code requirements. . Given the tourist nature of Clearwater boach, staff feels the use Is appropriate. Mr. Shuford said the P&Z has recommended approval of this proposal. Commissioner Thomas noted when the Commission addressed this earlier, he had indicated he wanted rent.a.heap type businesses prohibited and only standard new cars permitted. Mr. Shuford said he addressed that recommendation with the City Attorney who indicated the City could not be that specific regarding the types of vehicles but could address appearance issues. Commissioner Thomas referred to Sec. 41.053(23)(a) -the outdoor use shall not adversely effect the community appearance objectives of the City; in particular, the items displayed in the outdoor use shall be compatible with the surrounding fand uses in scale and appearance.. He felt the language is vary subjective. The City Attomey indicated she could not find the abUity to Um;t rentals to new cars. Commissioner Thomas reiterated his mincc01d.95 18 01/19/95 concern that the ianguage is subJectIve. The Cltv Attorney said tho compatibility issue is somethIng people 8ro familiar with Judging. Commissioner Thomas said car rentars on Clearwater b.each would be inappropriate because they would be uncontrolfabfe in this small community with its limited roal estate. Mayor Garvey questioned if this would require visitors to obtain rental cars at the airport. Commissioner Thomas noted rental cars are available Downtown. Commissioner Fitzgerald questione~ If the proposal would create parking problems on the beach. Mr. Shuford indicated an applicant would have to get 8 conditional use permit at which time aU site Issues would be reviewed. Mr. Shuford noted car rental is 8 tourist business. Commissioner Fitzgerald questioned if anything addresses why this Is not permitted. Mr. Shuford said nothing addresses this issue. He noted the general trend i!J to allow a wIder range of uses with appropriate controls in place. Commissioner Fitzgerald agreed with Commissioner Thomas that there ;s 8 rolatively constricted area on Clearwater beach and the number of vehicles there already is a problem. He said he did not support the suggestion the first time it was discussed. Commissioner Deegan agreed with Mr. Shuford's reasoning. He said the beach is a resort area where tourists expect to find rental cars within walking distance, not miles away. As this is an amenity tourists expect, he felt this type of business made 8S much sense for the beach as anywhere. He said the business would onlv require four or five parkIng spaces. Commissioner Deegan recommended reducing the size of parking spaces to Increase their number. Commissioner Deegan moved to approve the code amendment concerning car rental operations in the Beach Commercial and Resort Commercial 28 zonIng districts. There was no second. ' Commissioner Thomas moved to deny the code amendment concerning car rentar operations in the Beach Commercial and Resort Commercial 28 zoning districts. The modon was dulV seconded. Commissioners Fitzgerald, Berfield and Thomas voted MAye-; Commissioner Deegan and Mayor Garvey voted .Nav_" Motion carried. . Commissioner Deegan moved to that Commission Thomas explain to Jerry Miller why this Item was denied. The modon was duly seconded and carried unanimousry. ITEM #20. (Cont'd froOl 11117/94> Public Hearing & First ReJJ~fing Ouf. ~5683A9S. LDCA ra Wetland Area Setbacks (Amending Sec. 42.28 to require vegetative buffer setbacks adjacent to It Jurisdictional Wetlands. under jurisdiction of the State of FloridaHLOCA 94- 21 )(CP) Commissioner Berfield moved to continue this item until Februarv 1 6, 1995. The modon was dulV seconded and carried unanimously. public Hearing - Seqond RQPpJnQ Ord;nanr,es mtnccOld.95 19 01/19/95 . cr~ Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum \ 0 f~::i:;;f&.lm;~;~;;;(\r:~i,~;mfi(.~ Item II: ~;.::...............~.u...~...:-.,........: .\....,....,<:f: :,~g;"":'ft"~'~ .. ...... ~ ......... '. ,. ~} ::1::)::. ~~ . ~~~.. I" ~~ Meeting Date: 1:" "'~"',:- :<~"{ ,,"j ~}~ f}~:r~}}~{:~r~J~}~?~f~~.:'~~;::"~ SUBJECT: Land Development Code amendment pertaining to density and the requirements for calculations resulting in a fraction (LDCA 96-15) RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION: Approve the Land Development Code amendment pertaining to the requirements for calculations resulting in a fraction, and pass Ordinance No. 6063-96 on first reading. [J and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: , City staff has identified a need to revise the Land Development Code pertaining to the requirements for calculations resulting in a fraction. Also, as a housekeeping measure, the word linet n must be delted for determining density as the code now defines density as units per gross acre. Changes: · A fraction of one-half or more shall be considered a whole. . A fraction of less than one~half shall be disregarded. . Rounding of numbers shall be done after computations are made. . IiNet" is deleted from density calculations, consistent with the rest of code and the comprehensive land use plan. ' This ordinance was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board on July 16, 1996, with a unanimous recommendation for approval. Reviewed by: Originating Department: Costl: Commission Action: LD--S Central Permitting LAgal 55 N/A o Approved Budget N/A Totel o Approved w/Cond[t1one Purchaelng N/A User Department: o Denied Rlet Mgmt. N/A Cur,enr flscel Veer o ContInued to: 18 N/A Funding Source: ACM f Jlo tf.. o Cap/11Il ImprovanMnlr Otho, N/A Advertl.ed: 0 OperaUng: Dete: 0 Attachments: ~ Other: Paper: Ordlnence No. 6063.96 Subm1tted by: [J Not Required Appropriatlon Code Z~ Affected Parties: o Notified o None elt ana., o Not Required o Printed on recycled peper ORDINANCE NO. 6063-96 \0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLOIUDA, RELA TlNG TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION 40.007, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO AMEND AND REVISE THE INTERPRETATION OF AND VARIANCE FROM CHAPTER SECTION BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO NET DENSITY, BY DELETING THE OLD AND ADDING NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR CALCULATIONS RESULTING IN A FRACTION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. , I' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 40.007, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 40.007. Interpretation of and variance from chapter. (1) The administration, interpretation and application of the provisions of this chapter not otherwise specifically set out in this chapter shall be as set forth in chapter 35, which contains the Preamble, and chapter 36, pertaining to administration and enforcement. of thiS development code. (2) Any discrepancy between the minimum required lot size for a particular category of use and the maximum permitted net density for a given zoning district that would result from applying the minimum required lot size times the potential number of lots in a given district shall be resolved by applying the minimum required lot size for the individual categ0l1 of use. (3) Any mixed use development which includes a, density-regulated use and a non- density-regulated use shall have the permitted unit count determined by the following formula: . . . . . For the pu:rpese of determ.ifiing the actual number of residential d....Jelling units Of hotel/motel units '.vbieh may be pennitted-en a giveR parcel of laHd, fractions of Wlits which rerult from mathematically computing such umt count shall not be deemed to equal a unit.. * . . * . (5) When any reQ.J.Iirement of this chapter results in a fraction of a unit. a fraction of one- balf or more shall be considered a whole and a fraction of less than one-half shall be disre2arded. Roundin2 of numbers shall be done after computations are made. Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and detennined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. - . :;..;',.... ' ~,,;~"" ,>.:~-F:.::-~.~.": C".'t,.': ':;~: . >....;- ~ ,I :. . ','.' ". .'......t .... I: . Section 3; This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING , . , ' i'>r I", " PASSED ON,SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED . ., . ' Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner " ,;~',:" " , '. ~ ~:~: ; .. " . Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ' Attest:, 'i',-.'," Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk " ' ,~,,,:, . ::n " I,', ~ ....... , , Leslie Dougall- i es Assistant City Attorney ~~ ;:: : <\', ,,' .-.'. : .:;~, c .. j . .'~ , .. " ,\> .. ' , (" \' , '(: ' p', , ' ,', i, f ~.. '\ c '. . ", ,'..; . . .' ' .r , (0 " 1 i l 1 I ! " f I 1 I I t j J I I I i " I, Ordinance No. 6063-~ ~ '. ., , " ";.",' :~- r' '. ' ',... . ;,..\: ' 2 \ ,~> r~' .,' . , , .. ~ -::. ~I~ ..', . i; , >"':'1'< ,~ " (8 c~r3 Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum ) l [~;);;:(:::f.SyZJt{M)j({~~t1 It m # :"'"",'"'"..,''l''''..'",,,'..,<,';,, ";'," ~",', e ; ~.~.'~' :< ;~'~':;::: .:~~:;;:::....~.~:.:;~~;:~:.~~~.:::....... : :~~j ~"'t$"'~'" . .." :~:r: .::. .' '::..... . :.~; eating Date: ;':, , ..,:, ',..: ,",;:" ..:')\ ;~(.:~~t~}:::i~~:::~~~:{r~j J~~~;~;rJ~;::;~:~ SUBJECT: Land Development Code amendment specifying that density calculations for nursing homes be computed on the basis of three residents equals one unit, and parking for nursing homes be provided on the basis of one space per three residents. (LDCA 96~14) RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION: Approve the above-described code amendment and approve Ord. No. 6068-96 on first reading. 00 and that tho appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: · The attached ordinance proposes to change the method for calculating density from bed count to number of persons residing at the facility. It proposes that every three persons residing at the facility be equal to one unit. In effect, there will be no change to actual density, since the bed count and resident count will be equal. · The ordinance also proposes to change the parking formula for nursing homes. Currently, one parking space is required per three beds. The attached ordinance proposes to change the formula to one parking space being required per three persons residing within the facility. In effect, there will be no change to actual parking. , The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval on July 16, 1996. The Development Code Adjustment Board recommended approval on July 25, 1996. Costs: N/A Total CommIssion Action: o Approved o Approved w/Ctmdll/one o Denied o Continued to: ;:::::.:{-::~~::.~r;~~:.::~ ~'::' ;: "(::::f::::' ~:.: ::::~.:::::~: ::; .:...... :.:. .:...:...T.'.:.........:.. ."..:: .", '"';". C'.~ ....~. :~:' ~':::.:.~.~::~~r .~::?~:~~~:.;;~{::~.;::::;::; :~~(.~.~.~~: : ".-;.: "'. "'. :', ;.....;.; :.:.~. ':':';'c'>" .:.c.'.:~_~ .~.:.:':: Current Fiscal Veer SUbmItted by: ~~ Adv.rtJud: ~b'lU:t~~fP.:-1P.:..-:.-==:..~~r-:.~~~$~%:"~~~1(~;:;..-:-:.:~~::-:.:'~.. ;j~~."lr.~,ll~I~i: o Not Required Funding Source: o Clpllal 'mprovIlMnl: o Op.r.Ung;,.... '.. '.."',... ""....".......... ~h.': j~~:;;~;:::[:!):::,:::i::;:::::~;!;::riI::l:~I::;';~i;:::: Attachments: :':Q!~i~~W~)~~'~~;ij~}@~1fnJl Appropriation Coda ~ Affected PerU..: [J No6d pi Not Required ~~~1}t~ri~~~~~~;{~~Ht~~~~l~}f:((t~~~:~~&~~~~1~f:~~~~ttr??~~~~~;:~:~fJ~~t~~~~)~f; o None o Prin~d on recycled pip" I,'.,..., ' .,_..,... l}....p,., :- 11, '~">'::;-l . ,t~ " I,;i~:<;;)(;j;: ,,\;, " - PRQINANCE NO. 606S-96 AN ORDINANCE OF niE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA. RELATlNGr TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTIONS 35.11 AND 42.34, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO SPECIFY THAT OENSllY CALCULATIONS FOR NURSING HOMES SHALL BE COMPUTED ON THE BASIS OF ,lliREE RESIDENTS eaUALS ONE UNIT, AND PARKfNG FOR NURSING HOMES SHAlL BE REQUIRED ON THE BASIS OF ONE SPACE PER THREE PERSONS RESIDING IN THE FACILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER1 FLORIDA: I I ~~ctlon-.1. Section 35.11, Code of Ordlnancesl Is amended to read: Sec. 35.11. DeflnlUons. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this development code. shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly Indicates a different meaning: .' . * * . Nursing home means a health facility where persons are housed and furnished with meals and continuJng nursing care for compensation. For the purpose of computing density of a nursing home, every three persons re~jdlog beds within the facility at maximum capacit}! shall be cGnsidered equal to one dwelling unit. . . . .. * Sec. 42.34. Parl<.fng. (6) Offstreet parking spaces. . . . . . (d.) Schedule. The following shall be the minImum number of offstreet parking spaces required for each land use. activity, building or stnJdure permitted by this development code. VVhen the determination of the number of required offslreet parkIng spaces results In a requirement of a fractional space, any fraction less than one-haft space shall be rounded doWn to the nearest whole number and any fraction of one-half space or more shall be rounded up. Parldng spaces required on the basis of building floor area shan apply to gross floor area unless otherwise specified. Parking spaces required for employees shall be based on the maximum number of employees on duty or residing. or both, on the premises at anyone time, whIch woutd Inetude any overfap of employees at a change of shift. ::"'. ,'. . >~ ~ . " ...., , . : ~ . ~.;:; . , , ::;~~" >~: ' !,'... , , :;,' , ':':.: " , . ," J ,,: ....~ .' , , " . ", -. ~~> . " , . I~:.l.,: ~... . , ~ .i: " :;;" , " " '.;'." . !','". . I ", . ~ . . " , ,I ..,>no , 'I "f '" .; ,'. .H'., ..." . ,1. Residential and lodging uses. I I . . ft . . d. Nursing homes:' One parking space per three persons residing Within the '~((llltx bed8 occupIed at maximum capacity. Section 2. ,The provisions of this ordinance are found and detennlned to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. , Section a. this ordinance shall take effect Immediately upon adoptIon. PASSED ON FIRST READING ' PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commlssloner Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: 'Attest Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Crerk t I, I \ I ., .1 \ , , ~ ORDINANce NO eoG8-~ ' 2 , I . _I. "",.'h_........~.-.._- ' . . ,~.... ~". .............. ...~ ~ . . . ~ ...,....~ .... ",. .' ~ >" n"" ,". ( ,. .. ...d..J....,..U~I..{ .....~~ ,~.'~ .''''-:'''l,'''//''V. .' " :'1 :1, ,', "" ' , , ~ " '1 , .'i:'_ . I. . ", " , 00 ' ' JUL 1 7 1996 ,,. : I 1 , \ , \ \ ' " " ,; '"" . " " ~., "' ; ~'. ;i;:';:,~:'::~!:;-,,"~ ;'" ",; I ,", ~,\' ~,., " , . . ~.. ~'r' ...._. .'~._.~j. , :. < ...~ " ~\ ", .,' ~ I ~'. (,' , " .;1;.":,' ,'.. .' ~" :(. ',~ ';}',i' ." :': Item # 12 '~: . ~ ".' I", .' ,> ~i; _:" ~ '" ;' :~~~~\::: :~. '..' rti':'; .... ;, l:r:-.{..:. ' ~~:t; ',~,. ;':' ;.." f~ . ,I " ~~t~ ~~~." >:'" ~~I:"i:; . I.{~':\ : ':~ I;i: : . ~ "-. ,.. ,", ' .;1 .. ~ l . 6:;:...' .rr:." ;7'\.... -;If ", ~'.~'l I i I I .>:" ~.<~. ( . ~ . ,," '.- ":~: . '" \"-.' 'J:! ,"I .< ~. >~\:" . ~~':. 1 ~.I . :J"l\ ::~/> :(:,'.:.:" . : :: ~ , " . ">'1 . ',i-! :Y.~~f . .1,~ ,~. tt:;" TJl. .' " ~. ;~~;: ;. ~ t ~ I., , ~ :';;:;1 {". ):"', /~, ~h::.::;: J ;::r: !. ~ .. t ." ti'(.,~~' .r {ti/'.,':, ~" ~t;~~:~<.':: ','; ,: I~;;::;; " i I I , ! l , ' 1 " ~ " ~ " ci ~ + . ....: ~.(:.~.l,:~'.l:~..; ".1' '. .~: ;.h~ , ; " ~~~ ~. I> . i ,; c, I 1 I ' ! I' -'..,.,. ' \~. ORDINANCE NO. 5962-9~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING DMSrON 26 OF CHAPTER 40, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO PROVIDE FOR REVISED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE URBAN CENTER DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE , CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Division 26 of Chapter 40, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: DMSION 26. URBAN CENTER DISTRICT (UC) Sec. 40.481. General description. The urban center district is created to provide for and guide the development and use of land within the downtown area of the city in a manner that promotes the implementation of the comprehensive plan, promulgates the downtown area as a major retail, business, office, government and residential center of the city, and ensures the continued viability and growth of the ad valorem tax base for the downtown. The specific development regulations are intended to encourage planned development and revitalization of the downtown area consistent with the "Downtown Redevelopment Development Plan" and the city's comprehensive plan. Sec. 40.482. Expansion; contraction. Applications to expand or contract the urban center district shall be reviewed for consistency with the "Downtown Redevelopment DevelopHleBt Plan" and the city's comprehensive plan and judged in accord with expressed goals and objectives contained therein. Sec. 40.483. Subdistricts. The urban center district shall comprise the following fiye. feUF subdistricts: (1) ~ayfront UC(B). (2) Core.:l UC(C:l). (3) Core-2 UC(C-2) (4) ~ ~sJern Corridor UC(E), (S) ~ Transition DC(T). ORDINANCE NO, ,5962-96 - , " Sec. 40.484. Permitted uses. I . (1) Within the Bayfront subdistrict, only the following usc:s and structures designed for such uses shall be pennitted: (a) Indoor retail sales~t (b) Restaurants, except as provided in section 40.485~t (c) BusinesslprofessionaJ/govemment offices..t (d) Hotels/motels~t (e) Convention centers. includirq: accessory outdoor displays.t (f) Indoor commercial recreationlentertairnnent...t (g) Personal services..t (h) Accessory dwellings...t (i) Multiple-family dwellings..t (j) Commercial parking..t (Ie) Vendors franchised to sell on public property. (I) Churches, synagogues, monasteries, and other places of worship. (m) Accessory uses, including certain alcoholic beverage sales uses as specified in sections 41.071 and 41.072; (n) Art galleries/studios. (0) Townhouses. !lU fanners markets. !q) Public par](J;. .(r). Child day care facilities. , (2) Within the Core subdistricts, only the following uses and structures designed for such uses shall be pennitted: (a) Indoor retail sales~t (b) Restaurants, except as provided in section 40.434..t (c) Business/professional offices..t (d) Hotels/motels..t (e) Convention centers, including accessory outdoor displays.t (f) Indoor commercial recreation/entertainment..;; (g) Personal services...t (h) Accessory dweUings...t (i) Multiple-family dwellings...t (j) Medical clinics/laboratories...t (Ie) Commercial parking..t (I) Government offices and facilities...t (m) Business services...t (n) Transportation stations.t , (0) Interval ownership and timeshare dwellings...t (P) Funeral,homes...t (q) Nursing homes...t (r) Hospitals...t (s) Congregate care...i (t) Churches, synagogues, monasteries and other places of worship....;. (n) Social and community services...t . i ". I .' <,' c I! . : : :: ~ \1,' " oanmANCENO. 5962-96 " 2 \ ...... : .'1 " \'.' .'" 'L , , t' \ Public and private elementary, middle and high schools,.:\, Universities, colleges, academies and similar facilities for learnin~t Townhouses...t ' Commercial or trade schools. Child day care. Vendors franchised to sell on public property. ACcessory uses, including certain alcoholic beverage sales uses as specified in sections 41.071 and 41.072. (cc) Art galleries/studios. (od) Farmers marketc;. (W J>ublic parks. (3) Within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict, only the following uses (and structures designed for such uses) shall be permitted: (a) Indoor retail sales. (b) Restaurants, except as provided in section 40.485. (c) Business/professional offices. (d) Hotels/motels. (e) Convention centers, including accessot:y outdoor displays. (f) Indoor commercial recreation/entertainment. (g) Personal services. (h) Accessory dwellings. (i) Multiple"family dwellings. (j) Medical clinics/laboratories. (k) Commercial parking. (1) Government offices and facilities. (m) Business services. (n) Veterinary offices. (0) Transportation stations. (p) Interval ownership and timeshare dwellings. (q) Funeral homes. (r) Nursing homes.' (s) Hospitals. (t) Congregate care. (u) Churches, synagogues, monasteries and other places of worship. (v) Social and community services. (w) Public arid private elementary, middle and high schools. (x) Universities, colleges, academies and similar facilities for learning. (y) Commercial or trade schools. (z) Child day care. (aa) Vendors franchised to sell on public property. (bb) Accessory uses, including certain alcoholic beverage sales uses as specified in sections 41.071 and 41.072. Art galleries/studios. )ownhouses. Detached smile family dwellingli.. (v) (w) (x) (y) (z) (aa) (bb) . (cc) (dd) !W ORDmANCENo.5962-96 3 - 'f ~. '" ,'. j- )~ " , " . , (f{) Fanners markets. !ia) PubliQ parks. (4) Within the Transition subdistrict, only the following uses (and structures designed for such uses) shall be permitted: (a) (b) (c) , ,(d) (e) (t) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (I) (m) (n) (0) , (P) (q) (r) (8) (t) (u) (v) Indoor retail sales. Restaurants, except as provided in section 40.485. Business/professional offices. Indoor commercial recreation/entertainment. Personal services. Accessory dwellings. Multiple-family dweUings. Medical clinicsllaboratories. Commercial parking. Government offices and facilities. Business services. Transportation stations. Funeral homes. Congregate care. Churches, synagogues, monasteries and other places of worship. Social and community services. Townhouses. Three-family dwellings. Two-family dwellings. Detached single-family dwellings. Accessory uses, including certain alcoholic beverage sales useS as speCified in sections 41.071 and 41.072. Art galleries/studios. , I i ), ! r Sec. 40.485. Conditional uses. '! ; , ',., . ~!~~.L'I.L;u"::\ 't""-':f'~;';'~""';;"'.lr' <,'L~)r....... H . (1) Within the Bayfront subdistrict, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: (a) (b) (c) Transportation stations; Nightclubs, taverns and bars. Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages with outdoor seating where the service area is located within 200 feet of a residential zone. (d) Helistops. (e) Bed and breakfast inns. (f) Marina facilities. (g) Utility facilities. (2) Within the Core and Eastern Corridor subdistricts, the' following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: (a) Nightclubs, taverns and bars. (b) Package alcoholic beverage sales. (c), Bed and breakfast inns., ORDmANCBNO~962-96 4 . \' ~ Veterinary offices. Gasoline stations. Outdoor retail safeSt displays and/or storage. Outdoor commercial recreation/entertainment. Indoor storage and/or warehousing. Wholesaling/distributing. , Manufacturing. Vehicle service. Residential shelters. Utility facilities. Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages with outdoor seating where the service area is located within 200 feet of a residential zone. UU 'V~hicle sales. (3) Within the Transition subdistrict, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: (a) (d) (e) (t) (g) (h) (i) 0) (It) , ' (I) (m) (n) . ':>, (b) (e) (d) (e) (t) (g) (h) (i) (j) (Ie) (l) (m) , (n) (0) (P) /' .,'. Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages located within 200 feet of a church or school or with outdoor seating where the service area is located within 200 feet of a residential zone. Level I group care. Level n group care. Level m group care. Congregate care. Nursing homes. Child day care. Commercial Of trade schools. Residential shelters. Hotels/motels. Bed and breakfast inns. Veterinary offices. Public and private elementary t middle and high schools. Universities, colleges, academies and similar facilities for learning. Indoor storage and/or' warehousing. Utility facUities. Sec. 40.486. Use limitations. The following use limitations shall apply to the urban center district: (1) All alcoholic beverage sales shall comply with the applicable provisions of section 41.0(11~6.024 and ebapter 72. I (2) Vendors selling on public property shall be franchised by the city and shall operate only in accordance with the tenus of the franchise agreement. (3) Family, group and congregate care facilities shall comply with all tenus contained in section 41.201 136.020. (4) Accessory uses shall comply with all terms contained in section 41.121 136.008. " '" '::. . '-, ORDINANCB NO. 5962.96 !i - i I ' (5) All uses. whether permitted. conditional or nonconforming, shall be conducted in c<?nsonance with the use standards contained in sections 42.22. 42.31. 42.32 and ~ 136.00s.' !6.) Notwithstandio2 the lists of pentlitted and conditional uses in sections 40.484 and 40.485r the entire occupied space of the I:round floor of any structure. excludini parkirw iarazes as defined in section 41.251rwith frontaie on Cleveland Street shall be reserved for uses that contribute to pedestrian interestr such as indQor retail sales. restaurantc;. niihtc1ubs, taverns and bars, offices. iovernment offices. convention centers. entertainment complexes. residential uses. and hotel/motels.. (7) Any new development or construction located in the urban center district shall comply with the provisions of section 36.038r design review board. (8) Farmers markets shall be permitted only on public park property con.c;istent with approval procedures and operational standards established by the city of Clearwater. Sec. 40.487. Development requirements for the Bayeront subdistrict. (1) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and numeriCal requirements shall apply to development within the Bayfront subdistrict of the urban center district: (a) Maximum floor area ratio: 2.0. (b) Maximum density: 42 dwelling or hotel units per gross acre. (c) Maximum height: 60 feet. (d) Minimum setbacks from street rights.of~way: 1. For buildings having a height in excess of 30 feet: 15 feet. 2. For buildings having a height of 30 feet or Jess: 10 feet. 3. As an altcniative to subsections 1. and 2. above, for buildings which either do not provide surface parking or setback surface parking a , minimum of 20 feet from any street right-of-way: None. (e) Minimum setbacks from side and rear property lines: None. (t) Off-street parking: Off-street parking and loading requirements within the Bayfront subdistrict shall be the same as within the Core subdistricts. These requirements are set forth in section 40.488, subsections (2) through (6). (2) View corridor. 40 percent of the width of the property (measured parallel to Clearwater Harbor) shall be kept free of buildings for the purpose of providing a view corridor to Clearwater Harbor and Clearwater Beach. The view corridor may be a single continuous space or divided incrementally. The area within the corridor(s) may be maintained as open space, be utilized for amenities, or be surfaced for unenclosed parking. (~\ 1....,.,,s";'" "''''Aft 0.."............:.....,.. .-..1..._11 L..... '"...........:....n~ ....:...... ......-........... ',.........1 ,...-~-:.:,....,. ....h;..h ...-, .,~""a.,u,J \U....... .. "V1^'~U\<;) ;)..4U....... p~UYlU\<U "~U~ 5lUUUU I\<Y\<1 AUI\<lUU\<"" ~\< positively contribute to the ambience and aesthetics afforded the utJrban kGenter dBistrict, in accordance with the following schedule: " ORDINANCE NO. 5962-96 6 A .. ,L.' ~ 'V...-" . Floor Area Ratio Minimum Amenity Area (Percentage of Lot Area) 0.5--1.0 5 1.0--2.0 10 All amenity areas shall be designed to be used by the public and shall be located adjacent to street rights-of-way or shall be directly accessible from street rights-of-way. Such improvements may include interior or exterior pedestrian plazas, seating areas', fountains, sculptures or other works of art. and landscaped areas and gardens; floor area devoted to ground floor pedestrian interest uses in parking Garages ma.y be used tQ meet up to 50 percent of the required amenity area. All outdoor amenity areas shall be provided with illumination devices. Properties havinK less than 500 square feet of amenity area required by the above schedule are exempt from the requirements of tltis Subsection. Sec. 40.488. Development requirements for the Core subdistricts. (1) Dimensional and numerical requirements. (a) In the UC(C-l) subdistrict. the m3Jlimum floor area ratio shall he 3.0, the maximum heiiht shall he 150 feet, and the maximum residential and hotel/motel density shall be 70 units per eross acre. In the UC(C-2) subdistrict, the maximum floor area ratio shall be 5.0. the maximum heiKht shall he 180 feet and the maximum residential nnd hotel/motel density shall be 70 units per il'oss acre. In both subdistricts, all new strnctures shan observe the required build-to Jines and cornice hei2hts of the desilPl iUidelines. There are no side or rear setback requirements. ~ere shall be no floor area ratio, density, height or other development requirements in the Core subdistrict, except for-parking as provided in this section. (b) Bonus provisions. In the UC(C-l) Sub-District: Floor area radar hei2ht and den,;ity mllY be increased acco~dini to the followirw schedule. FLOOR AREA RATIO, HEIGHT AND DENSITY: FAR - Up to 4.0 BONUSREQlmREMENTS (All Must Be Met) Height - Up to 180 feet. }>-The development is a mixed use project incorporating pedestrian-interest us~ (see section 40.486(6)) on the ground floor with residential I hoteUmotel ORDINANCE NO. 5962-96 7 - Density - Up to 85 residential or hotel/motel units per gross acre. and/or office ~ses on the upper floors. )>The stJ::ucture and site desi2n is detennined. to substantially contribute to th~ architectural character of the area by the desi2n review hoard. )> EITHER: The amenity area provided for in subsection' (7) below is increased to 30 percent of the lot area; OR The development contains a residential component of at least 30% of the total development floor area. with at least 20% of the total number of residential units being affordable houshli In the UC(C-2) Subdistrict. Floor area 'ration, hei2ht and <tensity m~ be increased accord in a to the followin2 table: FLOOR AREA RATIO, HEIGlIT AND DENSIty FAR - Up to 6.0 Height - Up to 220 feet Denisity - Up to 85 residential or hoteUmotel units per gross acre. BONUS REQUIREMENTS (AU Must Be Met) ~The development is a mixed use project .. .. ed . ,. Incorporatmg p estrlan-lIltercst uses (see section 40.486(6)) on the ground floor with residential. hotel/motel and lor office uses pn the upper floors. )>The structure and site desiiJ1 is determin~d to substantially contribute to the architectural character of the area b}!: the desi~n review board. : . '.' , , >EITHER: The amenity area provided for in subsection (7) below is increased to 30 percent of the Jot area; OR , , I, ORDlNANCENO.5962-96 5 The devf:lopment contains a residential component of at least 30 % of the total development floor areal with at least 20% Qf the total number of residential units beine affordable housini (2) Off-street parking and loading requirements shall be as set forth in section 42.34 for any new, altered or expanded use except as pro~ided in this section follows: (a) Existing uses nonconfonning with respect to parking shall be entitled to be reestablished if damaged or destroyed, irrespective of the extent of such damage or destruction, to the extent of the use existing prior to damage or destruction without providing any additional parking, based on the requirements of this the section, beyond that which existed previously. (b) If a building existing on August 30, 1994, is conforming or lawfully nonconfonning with respect to parking, no additional parking shall be required for any change of use associated with such building. (c) Parking requirements shall be waived for new or expanded uses whose parking requirement is ten or fewer spaces. (3) Required offstreet parking shall be provided according to the following schedule: (a) Retail sales, offices, services, manufacturing, and other similar uses shall be provided with a minimum of one parking space per four hundred (400) square feet of gross floor area. (b) Restaurant and entertainment uses shall be provided with a minimum of one parking space per each 200 square feet of gross floor area. (c) Hotels, motels and bed and breakfast inns shall be provided with a minimum of one parking space per unit or guest bedroom, plus any required parking for other associated uses. (d) Residential uses shall be provided with a minimum of one parking space per unit. (e) Community service uses and places of assembly, miscellaneous public/semipublic uses, and warehousing uses shall comply with the parking schedule provided in section 42.34(6). (f) For any unlisted use, the development code administrator shall determine under which of the preceding categories of parking regulation the use falls or, if no category is available, the code administrator shall determine a formula that reasonably applies to the specific use. (4) It is hereby declared to be the intent of this section to provide for sufficient flexibility in the parking requirement formula so as to allow for consideration of individual situations and more innovative solutions to the provision of off street parking. Consistent wIth this intent, once the number of spaces required to serve a given use is identified, the city, in conjunction with the applicant, will review the existing or proposed public parking available to serve the proposed use, such unusual or special ORDmANCBNo. 59~2-96 9 .' conditions or provisions as might be unique to the use, and the desire and ability of the city to participate in any joint undertaking to provide parking space. In determining compliance with the above off street parking requirements, the foHowing specific factors may be taken into account and applied toward the number of required parking spaces: (a) The number of available offstreet public parking spaces that typically record less than a 9O-percent utilization rate, as determined by the traffic engineer, within 600 feet for long-term (over three hours) and 400 feet for short-tenn (three hours or less) parking. (b) The number of spaces that can be provided within 600 feet for employees and 400 feet for visitors based upon shared use of existing parking spaces, public or private, due to variation in typical hours of operation. If shared use of existing parking is proposed, a letter of no objection from the owner of the parking area to be shared shall be provided. (c) The number of available offstrect parking spaces within 600 feet for employee parking and 400 feet for visitor parking, owned or leased by the applicant for offsite parking space, provided such site is under the same ownership or there is provided evidence satisfactory to the city of a binding commitment of satisfactory duration to the use of such parking for the principal use in question during its nonnal hours of operation. Offsite parking arrangements may include private and/or public parking spaces and shall provide for the city to be notified 60 days prior to the termination or cancellation of any such arrangement. (d) The number of parking spaces that should be added or subtracted based upon unusual or special conditions unique to a particular use or based upon specialized programs such as carpooling or public transit opportunities and requirements for employees or visitors. (e) The amount of money offered as payment in lieu of providing required offstreet parking space, such payment to be based upon an estimated initial per space or annual operating and maintenance cost set by resolution of the city commission and subject to review at intelVals of not more than two years. In establishing the process for payment in lieu of parking, the city commission shall designate the responsible department or authority charged with receiving moneys and establishing a fund to be utilized exclusively for the provision of capital improvements to and operation and maintenance of parking facilities in the urban center district. (t) The direct and indirect contribution toward and feasibility of acquisition, construction and/or operation of new or expanded parking facilities in conjunction with the proposed use. (5) 'All new, altered, or expanded uses requiring more than ten parking spaces shall submit a parking plan to the traffic engineer which shall document the following: (a) Location of property, type of use, required number of parking spaces for each use and composition of required parking, Le., longtenn and shorttenn; (b) Proposed provision for parking onsite and/or offsite; (c) A vaiJable public parking and proposed use thereof, by location, if proposed to be counted; ORDINANCE No5962";l96 10 >I I, .... .<,; '" " , C . I .~ . . t. ,"' '.' . \:, , ' l : (d) t. j (e) Alternative financial contribution in lieu of parking. if anYt and the basis therefor; , , Other proposed arrangements designed to meet, or be in lieu of, parking requirements . ~., ~ (6) AU determinations made under the provisions of this the section shan be approved by the city manager. Appeals of any decision of the city manager relating to the application of the provisions of this section may be made to the city commission. Detennination as to the required number of spaces and the number and basis of ,establishing any ,addition to or subtraction from this number by the city manager or city commission shall be noted and made a part of the building permit record of the city. , The city commission or its designee may provide for lease payments to the public parking system or payments in lieu of parking on such installment or incremental basis as is deemed fmancially equitable and sound. (7) Alnenity areas. Properties shall be provided with ground level amenities which 'ppsitively contribute to the ambience and aesthetics afforded the uYrban k~nter d9istrict, in accordance with the following schedule: :C:. ~ " , , , " , '. ~ ,. /,Y,; ,\ ,,{ ," I ",'.; c I " .~ I ' ' /: ' .\.' . ;,,'. ',': . .::', "o','f. "'. f: :/: I ;~ ; R' .: '., ,.;"', , .. :., ~~. . , ' :..."" ." " , .....,_.. ;'c " lc~': . ~;';'. , I.:' ORDINANCBNO. :5962-96 ~{(.," " '\1 ~.' 11 '.j ~ Floor Area Ratio Minimum Amenity Area (percentage of Lot Area) 0.5--1.0 5 Greater than 1.0 10 All amenity areas shall be designed to be used by the public and shall be located adjacent to street rights-of-way or shall be directly accessible from street rights-of-way. Such improvements may include interior or exterior pedestrian plazas, seating areas, fountains. sculptures, and landscaped areas and gardens; floor area devoted to around floor pedestrian interest uses in parkin~ garaees may be used to meet up to 50 percent of the requires! amenity area. All outdoor amenity areas shall be provided with illumination devices. ~6per:ties having less than 500 square feet of amenity area required by the above schedule are exempt from the reqJJirements of this subsection. .an Notwithstandin~ the dimensional requirementc; of this Section set forth above. all prQperties with frontage on Cleveland Street between Osceola Avenue am! Myrtle Avenue shall observe the fonowin~ archifectural desi}:n reqJlirements: .(a) hll new structures shall either be erected with no setback from the Cleveland Street right-of-way or shall provide the req.uired ~ound level amenitY area jn a1'\,V setback from the Cleveland Street right-of-way. (b) All new structures shall have a primary pedestrian entrance directly from the Cleveland Street right-of-way or from the required ground level amenity area. (c). All new structures exceedine 40 feet in height shaH be constructed so as to provide a maximum 40 foot exterior cornice heieht alon2 the facade~) of the structure facing Cleveland Street. For the purpose of thif; section. the followini definitions are established: .L. Cornice. exterior - The uppermost horizontal molded prqjection or other uppermost horizontal element located at the top of a buildin2. usually under the eaves.. 2... Cornice heiJ:ht - The vertical distrance from ground level (top of finished sidewalk) to the top of the exterior cornice. used to determine visual puiJdine heii:ht at sidewalk property lines. ORDINANCE NO. 5962-96 12 - Sec. 40.489. Development requirements for the Eastern Corridor subdistrict. row Dimensional and numerical requirements. The foIlowin2 dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict of the urban center district~ (8)(-11 Maximum density: 70 dwelling units or hotel/motel units per 2ross acre. (b)6!:) Maximum floor area ratio: 3.0. (c)G1 Maximum height: 150 feet: the required cornice heights of the desi2n J:uidelines shall be observ~ 200 feet (d) Setbacks: In both subdistricts, all new struClJjres shall observe the required J:>uiJd-to lines of the design 2uidelines. There are no side Qr rear setback reqJlirements . (e)(41 Offstreet parking: Offstreet parking and loading requirements within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict shall be the same as within the Coore subdistricts. (f) Bonus provisions. Floor area ratio, heiiht and density may be increased accordini to the followini schedule. FLOOR AREA RATIO, HEIGHT AND DENSIt:Y: FAR - Up to 4.0. BONUSREQrnREMENTS All Must Be Met) Hei2'ht - Up to 180 feet. )>The development is a mixed use project inC;;Ol::poratini pedestrian-interest use:; (see section 40.486(6)) on the ground floor with residential, hotel/motel. and/or office uses on the upper floors. D~nsity ~ Up to 85 residential or hotel[ motel units per 2'ross acre. 2.The structure and site desi~ is determined to substantially contribute to the architectural character of the area b)!: the desiin review board. .1 ,... EITHER: The amenity area provided for in subsection (2) below is increased to 30 percent of the Jot area; OR The development contains a residential CQmponent of at least 30% of the total development floor area. with at least 20 % of the total number of residential uses. bein.: affordable housin2'. ORDlNANCB NO. 5962.96 13 - -, moo Amenity area. Properties shall be provided with ground level amenities which positively contribute to the ambience and aesthetics afforded the uYrban cGenter dt)istrict, in accordance with the following schedule: FJ oar A...d... Minimum Amenity Area (percentage of Lot Area) rea Ratio 0.5--1.0 5 Greater than 1.0 10 :\. All amenity areas shall be designed to be used by the public and shall be located adjacent to street rights-of-way or shall be directly accessible from street rights-of-way. Such improvements may include interior or exterior pedestrian plazas, seating areas, fountains, sculptures, and landscaped areas and gardens; floor area devoted to uound floor pedestrian interest uses in parking garages may be used to meet up to 50 percent of the required amenity area. All outdoor amenity areas shall be provided with illumination devices. Properties havin2 less than 500 square feet of amenity area requjred by the above schedule are exempt from the requirements of this subsectionL 3) Notwithstandin2 the dimensional requirementc; of this Section set forth above:.. all properties with frontaie on Cleveland Street between Myrtle A venue and Frederica Avenue shall observe the follOwing architectural desie-D requirements; La) All new structures shall provide the required 2round level amenity area and shaH not have a front setback more than 40 feet from the Cleveland Street ri2ht-of-way. (b) All new structures shall have a primary pedestrian entrance directly from the Cleveland Street rie-ht..of-way or from the reqJ1ired wound level amenity area. !c) All new structures exceeding 60 feet in height shall be constructed so as to provide a maximum 60 foot exterior cornice hei2ht alon2 the facade(!() of the structure (acini Cleveland Street. For the purpose of this sectionr the followine- definitions arc established: W Cornice, exterior - The uppermost horizontal molded projection or other uppermost horizontal element located at the top of a buildin2, usually under the eaves. .(2). Corni~ heieht - The vertical distance from the 2round level (fop of finished sidewalk) to the top of the exterior cornice, used to determine visu~ buUdin2 heiiht at sidewalk property line&. .un All front setback areas shall be pedestrian-oriented and fully landscaped. W No parkine- shall be permitted in any front setback areas on Cleveland Street. ORDINANCE NO. 5962..96 14 . .~ . ...... Sec. 40.490. Development requirements for the Transition subdistrict. WOO Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within the Transition subdistrict of the uYrban kGenter dBistrict: OO{l) ~ ~ ., 'l ~ '.. ~ " " !fl(6) ~' ) . i',' !b)(8) , m(9) Maximum density: 28 dwelling units or 42 hoteIlmotel units per net acre. Maximum floor area ratio: l...fh For residential or hotel/motel uses: None. 2...1r.- For other uses: 0.3. Maximum height: l...fh For residential or hotel/motel uses: 60 feet. 2..lh For other uses: 35 feet. Minimum lot area: 6,000 square feet. Minimum. lot width at setback line: 60 feet. Minimum lot depth: 85 feet. Minimum setbacks: Principal and accessory structures shall be afforded setbacks which measure not less than as follows, nor less than any greater requirement , which may be applicable to a particular propertY in accordance with the unifonn development regulations contained in chapter ~ !36: La. From a street right-of-way: 20 feet. 2...lh From a side property line: 5 feet. J...&: From a rear property line: 10 feet. Minimum open space: l...fh For the lot: 30 percent of the lot area. 2..lh For the front yard: 55 percent of the front yard area. Off-street parking: Off-street parking and loading requirements within the Transition subdistrict shall be governed by the requirements of section ~ .t-26.022. Ii r: , i Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 'I', .,"1 .' I . ORDINANCE NO. 5962-96 15 - " .....-..t..':."..rll.'~' I,~.TI:'.~""". ...E.,::.:..,:'....~j'!~, _"""_~I'.: "'1 ",~"~'I.'.''''_'~''''''.r'' ~. u"; ..,...~, 1 ' " ! '\, l; !., \.~' r:i, , , ..... ,', .' ,;.". '., ~~ j, . . "\ ....., " , .... ;1 :t'.'>: ", " PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED .', PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED ;'jXt.;', " , 1',. . : t;:':' ~ ~ I ::;~\",':, ~ ,",' ,Approv~ as to form and j;j<., :' ; . ,", .' legal sufficiency: '. , '6"" .. ' . ~:,.. ", . " ..~ . !~ ',' \ . " : 1':';; . :"t~1 .,: ;'~j . ;j ", f,} : . '; .' ~ . ,. , C r'.,. .. ~. > r,\ .~ t 0' j ~, . . (': " ....., . ~, ' . ~ 'I ..;.E I ~,..:'~' I: " ~.' ~:. '. .:: .' ..e, .., ~L'", H: ~r' 'f.' '... ,. , ~. 1.'. f "', : l"'j',", ; ". ~. . ".",". . .;', ~. .. . > i .. ..;~~, i:,^-:,::;.: . ,'1, r." , ,f<,.;" . ~\....: ~" . Iii:,. .' .. ~Wi,~':::' :'~~: ' \r'~:. " .:' ", !.l.t.' ., ~~.: 5 ,~ . - .: . . .'.. . f<'" !'.~ '. ~' '.. '" 6., _ Leslie K. Dougall- i es Assistant City. Attorney .~ .' .r I ..' " ~ ..' , \ " ,< 16 .........\. . AU~U8t 1. 1996 Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk '. , ORDINANCE NO. 5962.-96 - p ..... . . ..'.. '.. " . . . " \3 I I I ORDINANCE NO 6964-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING A11.AS OF THE CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY CONSISTING OF SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 29S. RANGE 15E; SECTION 16. TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE 15E; AND SECTION 15. TOWNSHIP 295, RANGE 15E, AND BOUNDED BY OSCEOLA ON WEST. ROGERS ON SOUTH. GARDEN ON EAST, JONES ON NORTH FROM UC(C) TO UC(C)1; GARDEN ON WEST, JONES ON NORTH, PROSPECT AVENUE ON EAST, TURNER ON SOUTH FROM UC(C) AND UC(E) TO UC(C)2; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' : ' i WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth In thrs ordinance Is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and Is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; now, therefore, , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property In ClealWater, Frorida, is hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows: ',: , ./, Property ~oning DIstrict See Exhibit B From: Urban Center Core - UC(C) To: Urban Center Core>> UC(C)1 From: Urban Center Core - UC(C) and Urban Center Eastern Corridor - UC(E) To: Urban Center Core - UC(C)2 See Exhibit A (Z96-01) Section 2. The Central Permitting Director is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. , , , I' . OfdInanee No.1....... ~J~{YY~;Jr:::~~h;:\i:,..,,\, ""~: .n:"",:."., ",:",.,.. .~...,,'_, .., I " I' , \ ',I i;:: '. , . '. I.. " '-'.', , ~~. . 'r j';<"': :'.. . ;.).. ," i.~:,:;\,/,,;': : ~~,~/~.. . " , ",J ' ~. "\., . . '.~ . , '" '.-' ".'. ", . h.' > '~. . . ~'.~/ ' .: :~: l, '" : ".) .'. ... ~ ~ I : . ~'."'. t~'.:., . :'(,::, , ,',1 '. ;'::;. :~':: T." , {;\:~~':'I' ~I -a:... ~." I.' :,~:~: . .~~', " ~'~i. . :'. .~ ~ ~..... '. .:....:. ,~: '. , , "';'!".' .' .' ;:~:~> '.~ ,. "."" . or... .' ~ \1'.', ", : ."~: '."' .' !'.' . ~. :. ~,: .... , " .!:~' , :,'"}: , 't ~ .j. ':. : .' ~ ~~ .' . '". ,. , :0;,' . ,.\<(.< :: I ~ '\. ~ - . :.'. ". ";' 'l' . :";.. ~I ': . ~ .:" trf.,d ...... ;;~::':::.. ': ~:"':<:~~ t.~ . 'r . '. .-e., ,.1 '. . "'I'\t.. ;~,":" rp' ~ . r~. '~.'""\ I" '. , '~ection 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. " PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FJNAL READING AND ADOPTED August 1, 1996 Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Attest: , Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk I, ' . " I i ) I 1 I r I, ! ! 1. , , I I [ l I I , I ! '. , OnUMnce NQ,,5964-96 :' .:' J". . :. >'.~.~,j< . oj. . .~ 't',: ;, " . . . , . ~, . ' '. " EXHIBIT "A" URBAN CENTER (CORE) 1 BEGIN at the intersection of the centerllnes of Osceola Avenue and Jones Street; thence East along the centerline of Jones Street to the centerline of Garden Avenue; thence South along the centerline of Garden Avenue to the centerline of Franklin Street; thence West along the centerline of Franklin Street ,to the centerline of Garden Avenue; thence South along the centerline of Garden' Avenue to the centerline of Chestnut Street; thence West along the centerline of Chestnut Street to the centerline of a North-South alley lying In Block 1 of Wallace Addition to C!earwater, as recorded In Plat Book 3. Page 6 of the Public Records of Hllfsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was once a part; thence South along the " centerline of said North-South alley to the centerline of Rogers Street; thence West along the centerline of Rogers Street to the centerline of Fort Harrison Avenue; thence North along the centertine of Fort Hanison Avenue to the centerline of Court Street; thence West along the centertine of Court Street to the centerline of Osceola Avenue; thence North along the centerline of Osceola Avenue to the POB. " '.1 ~ '.,' j' , ! I ! ,,' , '.'. ' \' I i, Ordinance !111M-Be ~r ~p I I . ~ , "'~":i7'.. I" · - J. 'J.:J.,~..I'" itl:'- · .. ,~'l"I'>I.I'lIT31'III;::..-n~n J.<!..rt;IfJ,"D ... I . 'T'~ I1lt ". t 'M:"'" tL..l1i.hlIJ~tlUJ.1 , . '- J ~NES STREET - ,-. I UC (8) - · l ~' JI ;=.ji~ · 11- I" , f I - I ... 'Q" · ~ ~ · ~ ;!l I- --i ': .. , " ~ ." .. .. I '.. "'i 'J t~I.7i'r.I-" · '!I' .ft.tl. .' "t.', :ft.' ... l.' t~l,. ~; --;-l";'-::~-;---: :::':;~~." :H; :~ W i~-'~-:'~'l:^l~ .. : .~-~/,,;._:;;?lJli" U-;;;;')C~' '(\ ,":1' 'li1:~\I.....:rH 'r. 'l'f-~~ 1..- " ,,, I7liT1Ell lj) I -0 .l!.r. : t if 11. " f. ......'1r,O I....;. . 1.1 . I I ! .- 3. ~~-A,;;~S.~~ .. ~"I~! "~::~ ';~~.~fiJ~: ~""'~~'~~'""~ ,,1-~ ~ I I' '~~r.-. I .'1 ::.! 1=~I-...lC.::1I '-:'-"-" ...-., .': .,.,.7"'" .1.''''' I;_+-=-.'~I:_ I ,--'-' .~ I ~~i1ldr1~ -... It t~.,I,1 . 'P ....~U 11 -,." .'1 M0 ":'11., 150 II 111':", 'I · ~ I ".1 . . ',~ ~ ". \ I ~ j ~ · .l1.1uit. UJ . ~ "J..f.~"1 .'I;~J~"\: ".'. J" . . Ii'. .. "II !'Nf ; z ........ . Z lU. :::> CLEVELAND STREET "':10- ""_'11-- I I r 'I W Irfhl' , W HI z' !Illltlllll' ~ - 'I III II' I l <<YU" J ~, > r1.t-n~+ I, t>.. . W';.. . II,. . . .,. ~&~. .. I I ... 'I!JJLI . III ~" I' m < < > ' . I"' ~i~ (D i,1 ,ft,...... I .:(. I..t 1/ .fH ., !~~ L . ~t,... .;.. ;I;f~ ..1~1 '" ...1.. .1 u...... ___ <<:C. .-. Z . I I I I " I "I 1'1' : I i ----------- ~- -,,- ...J. 0...... ffi ,.... .... · I..... tII ...,. '- - \~C(~J ~fl":." @~ : .~~o~ I" .', ',.I,I.I.i.1! !1.r.'\U1.It:" '11,' 'I: ,.~. ~'": "UC(a> i,!I~~: !... · __ .~ .. .. J~~~': 'i ~~_.. -UC (E)!' : .. ri : ~ I.:_::_::~..\ "-rod liD - ..... .~l:I-:'i-CJ i',.,.: :111]I- - -. ~ =-t~ , \ cu can t'OIfII) 0" '. r--; . I"""; r .. . ~ , ...- - ..... ~ , I"."'" & ... .. It , .1 . I~ . _ I - .. L--r_______ ,. , .... u. .' - - ,- 'V' .. I!; --- -: " t' '''- ...... -.1 .' -. · I . - ...... II l'r: q ~ , _ r _ ,"" --.. __ .-, I Ill.,. ~l.... ~ . '1.' : ': :11' ... ,/ -... ..... · \ . ~ t M · ~J I . I ,I. . t . .. ' I tt; I III I" ... t ..___________j~- Ii _" _ . . .. .. ~....!. r;------.____L ...... I r: .. II . 11-. ,... $I I .....' . : ~:::-=--;p,.~-'- J: ~: ~:'j, ~: ~:- .... I ~OURT S~~EETl.l rl~I': -I.~-"';~\ ~~ r'---------- JWI'PlI ," ~J~ - ","'.. . J '. . · .~~I · I ..,.. I::'~ ..:::t~ I oJ-. .' r r .wv . l f .... . · I ... _... ~ I.",;. Q)CA' _ ~~ _ I ..... . .. . 'i ... "'" ,. f f fit "t ,.. ... ~___~_ ..... l"!iESJ..NuT STBEET ~2- .:h __ . . " ~ : # ~"~ ... a:~" I oj .IJ~I: " · .~, · ,"I~j}1 ~~ ~\ .. ~.W (~ --------,-- t'~1I '_1;... ~ .,--;"n::: .' . .....-, . ~pGERS TREET 1 .. · .. I ~ - · " "....~! ~ ., o.I<J .' or. . I ,I. · · . .'. J I -rud m't II..!....L...J · If , .jI". I". .. ..., r\:", 1.11..... ".M u... .~ lCllOtM l' .I 1:"- . '~.J..!-d ~ ." I ., e ' 1>1"' .. _u_u. 10M "-It I ~. /'/ ' " _ 'liD' " _r.;-I],t; !. 11'1 I uuU '-'I"I'n"ho ;r."7\ r1:n TURNER STREET .- -Jr:I..1'T' ~-.r~ rr ~~ - . I~;, ,:,t,,:,, '':'i;.::~- ......'.. ,h.t-w;......~.~e...=.~. ,=tll-=-~]I,:.,J '~.l~,\.,II"rlll:', TiI."~, rrrr1 P 111111'~111'! Illr l'rl TL2.L' ~ I , I r , PROPOSED REZONING OWNER: Multiple z: ~6-o, APPUCANT: City of Cfearwater PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Bounded on the North by Jonas Street. on the East by Garden Avenue. on the South by Rogers .Stroet and on the West by Osceola } Avenue. " ZONIN!1 , , < FROM: UC(CJ . :. TO: UCtC) 1 ! . ATlAS PAGE: 2778. 2868 & 2959 SECt 09 TWP: 29 S RGE: 15 E SECt 16 lWP: 29 S RGE: 15 E PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY COMMISSION Ordinance No. 5964-96 ":XHIBIT A EXHIBIT "B" URBAN CENTER (CORE) 2 BEGIN at the intersection of the centerlines of Garden Avenue and Jones Street; thence East along the centerline of Jones Street to the extended centerline of Fern Avenue;' thence South along the centerline of Fern Avenue to the intersection of the centerline of Drew Street and extended Fern Avenue; thence East along the centerline of Drew Street to a point of intersection with the extended centerline of the North-South alley lying East of Block 6. R.J. ", I Booth Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 22, of the public records of Pinellas I County, Florida; thence South along the centerline of the North-South alley lying East of Block 6, R.J. Booth Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 22, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, to the centerline of Grove Street; thence South to the Northwest corner of M&B 22.05; thence Soutl1 along the Westerly property line of M&B 22.05 and South along the most Westerly property line of M&B 22.06 continuing to the centerline of Prospect Avenue; thence South along the centerline of Propsect Avenue to the intersection of the centerline of Cleveland Street; thence East along the centerline of Cleveland Street to the intersection of the extended centerline of Prospect Avenue; thence South along the centerline of Prospect Avenue to its intersection with theEasterly extension of the South line of Lot 8, Block 17, of Magnolia Park as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, and Plat Book 1, Page 70 of the public records of Pinel/as County, Florida; thence West along said Easterly extension of the South line of said Lot 8 and the South lines of Lots 1 through 8, Block 17. to the centerline of Myrtle Avenue; thence South along the centerline of Myrtle Avenue to the centerline of Turner Street; thence West along, the centerline of Turner Street to the centerline of East Avenue; thence North along the centerline of East Avenue to the extended Northerly lot line of Lot 6 through 10. Block 19, Magnolia Park as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, and Plat Book 1, Page 70 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence West along said extended Northerly lot line to Ordinance 69~96 i " I, ' i' , . ~ '. . { . .. (, " " , ' , , .; :. " ' ).. " " ~ ~ ~ ,-, " . ~.\ ~:', " !.~ ; I~': .: :.j' . ~\,., cr~:-' , " .. I . . ....., the Northwest'comer of Lot 10, Block 19, Magnolia Park as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, and Plat Book 1, Page 70 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence North along the West property line of Lot 1, Block 19,' Magnolia Park to the centerline of vacated Rogers Street; thence West along the centerline of vacated Rogers Street to the extended East property line of Lot 1, Block 2, Wallace Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 6 of the public records of HiIIsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was once a part; thence North along the extended Westerly property line of M&B 41.01 to a point of intersection of Chestnut Street and the extended West property line of M&B 41.01; thence West along the centerline of Chestnut Street to the centerline of the intersection of Chestnut Street and Garden Avenue; thence North along the centerline of Garden Avenue to the point of intersection with the centerline of Franklin Street; thence East along the centerline of Franklin Street to the centerline of Garden Avenue; thence North along the centerline of Garden Avenue to the POB. Exbibit B Ordinance 159~96 I. ~~~;: ,': ~~~J~;... l~~.".L~. I .f.11; · ~~ · ~ ... .. ~ J;,.1' .~ 'f ,t.. ''J' ~~rSTREET UC(B) ~~~ ij / ~:T'J' · ~; ~.. . , .Irnb~ ..... bl~!.~.l 0~_'1"'-1 ;r.. . ~ I , , ~ '" 11-.tf ' ....--~_. DREW ST8.EET ~ IC _M _~I . aE. - L",:";_ _7::.....i; :: . r-m U'fi Mil ... -- j""'" ;-;;:;;;t t:c=l., ... wi~" .... ~ ffiE , !" --. . ~. - ,.-::) rl -- ~ - ,\9 -...... * ffi J ~ n r;-ll'-' : i ,'1, ' -~J!.'!.fa_C!lI~- ~'~>oL' "'I-~ . r~~~1 \l. 'I ....._111111 '. '<~'..'. .-. .. · ~... .~-;f- ffii':irel ..-~t'-z'~i~'il\',: ..'.. n, - ~ ...... . ,............. . ~iw " . I ~:7'~=:.~1( ..: !f;!:f:h : .. 0>: ~ t:.- · 1 ."7., · :~' ." ::;- II ",1 . I ~'~"i: ~ ~ri.~~'~ ~i~ ~."" ,': ~J~": I'''. lEVELA~Q. STREET'" Z "" l~.. 'I. -. It>N~- I 'a1~' \W~ 1 .. lllI,.. I I' II I _ J I '., '!i'!" > ..j:" . . I ..!. ~ .'.. I" I b! ~~ ::." ,,. on ,<~., ..I ".. ...I....r-~..I...,. I )-___~W. Z';"i'T l.I\; . ,I . 1 1.1'i"lI, 'S). :J... 0 I - -. ,'I. - .. .".. ~'"~ ffi. ~ : U)~':r~ ~ U C (el '2- '.1'" ;".' 'I: p. II ~I~ : _ · _, .~.:: ~d~l ~t _ !,,"~;~~ :: :: .\.- I ''i!i'~:S x,~ I". /III HI'i '~!II' - ill -. \~\"F;:I Ho._ .....~ I I .JITT..1kT "11,.1011 > aut ('II" _ .. w a:, I- ..." . .. ~ \ I~'" U to":::t : : ,I rttM , .. .I;U,I.I ""'. 1. ,~~ *~ u.~., - FRANKLIN STREET I - .. ti - _ u.,,'-I -- . I III 'lIw'" " , .. 't'M ' "T'll):(JJ II' · (I)', I ':... , . .. . · ..: .~... Q. ~ : " '.. . (/J I a/1',... '~:..r1i, , :- t-, r:..~ .... :'~:.'I ," ~ .. I. I '. . ~. ..: ... 1 COURT '1 T' ). - 0- ~ ~I...t" f', . - - .L..... -:-.-= ,P1; , ~ l~ IM-" - r ,. _chEsiN u$sm~ ". 2-.~; I ~. ~. t Ef ., I Gr.r.I, ,r. iii . . 'I I -.. -lll-j', '_~' J t' ) · ;7' ~ ~~QGE~S ST~~11:r · I A .. · ,~. .. It. , ~. {.\, ~J e W": '~I ., M" ..... . II~ J - . . I'!..-.....,.-.'f .. r ., en P · 1 hl..,.!. 'I".' . .' ~ ~J: !, I, ~ I t a n iTTil JURNER STREET f' ~ -, - '" '<l"I.I_.~I.~tMlJ.,,~~~r::ln:::',~ ':;(1" · '11' JI I ~,~Ip.I,~"ln)'1l1I1HII.1 Wfij" ~~ IIJ,lT,1 Rl'l'11'~j"1111 !II _ .. - .,. If ......~,J:fl .1.1.\ '.u~ . ....., t:~ . nil, "'d. ,.t...t".... ,J:". . , ..t'lJr_ " . : r].t-- .~ ;... - ....... .. . .. .. .:... ~ B .. JIll. , .U"rlil.~ I~~ ._. ,- I I w "".~~~ II!' , .~1 -'-~ , . ". ., FR ilF =+ I. ~ Ij I' :--;- I 11\ - - , ~ ... .. I .... 1'.. ..l~ I '.. .. r!' ".'1' . I I .. · I I' · r: '" ,.~, . ~ I~:-:"--~- I I- . , . ~ . I _ ,1..-1 1 1 I I I r:::I ' . · _ f-X4.. .MU a. . l--:.. · .. i.!. ; UC (E):-. .. , .m't.~'l'l. !~~Vr ; ...... . I I . J ~I' ~ . I I, :T-I . , '. <D i I M I'!.., , ~ . .... r41'~ 1.......- ~ l---------- L --- - --,...------ I I , I I ......~ ....----------- !- .....! . . , I R.~ l:-l ~ti .. ~-< . . ~~ -- "-~::: Ifi~~~"" R- ~ · .. k .':- ~ .. 1'- , .. I ., ""C ill .. . ' t:q. ~ -....--- - - .... E ..'t';,.III.t...... (: I . t, .. III I.~ ......." II ~~",' PROPOSED REZONING OWNER: Multiple APPUCANT: City of Cfearwater z: ~6-:O1 PROPERTY DESCRIP11QN.: Bounded on tho North by Jones Street, .on the East, by Prospect Avenue, on the South by Tur!,er Street and the West by Garden Avenue. FROM: TO: ZONING UC(C) and UC(E) UC{C)2 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD SEC: 09 1WP: 29 S RGE: 15 E SEC: 161WP: 29 S RGE: 15 E CITY COMMISSION Ordinatlc.e No':'".. 5964-96 ATlAS PAGE: 2778, 286B & 2958 F.)UlIBIT B .' .. I ~ 'c ." ORDINANCE NO. 6069-96 , \~ .' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; AMENDING SECTION 47.051 ADOPTION AND ENFORCEMENT TO ADOPT THE 1996 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND THE 1995 EDITION OF THE STANDARD FOR TIlE STORAGE AND HANDLING OF LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GASES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: i " Section 1. Section 47.051(1)(b) and (1)(d), Code of Ordinances, are amended to read: See. 47.051. Adoption and enforcement. ,'. (1) There shall be enforced within the city, by the building official, the following standard or national codes, which are adopted by reference: .......... , ' !' , , , , . (l)(b) National Electrical Code, 1995o edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association. .......... (l)(d) Standard for the Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases, NFP A 58 199.s.~ edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association. Section ~. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING August 1, 1996 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED t,' " Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner '" , ' ,. . Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Xd/"~ Leslie DougaJl- . es Assistant City Attorney Attest: cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Ordinance 6069.96 ., Gs' Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum \ 5 "..t1..I;:.~ '8' -, 5'.q? SUBJECT: Purchase of a 1997 two-ton truck with dump body RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract to Sun state International, Tampa, PL, for the purchase of a 1997 two-ton truck with dump body at a cost of $49,913.47, whicih is the lowest, and most responsive and responsible bid submitted in accordance with city specifications; financing will be provided under the city's master-lease purchase agreement, II and that the approprfate offf~fals be authorIzed to execute same. BACKGROUND: I ~ This purchase replaces unit Gl199, a 1985 Chevrolet 2-ton dump truck, which is on the FY 95/96 replacement list. ~ Fleet Maintenance and Public Works personnel have evaluated the bids and agree that the low bid meets the needs and bid specifications. ~ This is an "in-kind" replacement for a 1985 Chevrolet 2-ton dump truck, requiring extensive engine rebuilding, rust and mechanical repair estimated to cost $13,300.00. ~ This truck will be used for beach cleanup and storrnwater ditch cleaning. ~ Funding is budgeted in project/code: Motorized Equipment - Lease Purchase, 315-94221-564100-590-000, which has available funds of $261,532.87 as of July 30, 1996. ~ There will be no budgetary impact for this purchase during fiscal year 1995/96. , Reviewed by: Legal I Budget i Purchasing l Risk Mgmt. I CIS ACM . Other I I i 1.....1 tt - I City N/A JJ::i; ... N/A N~ ~ Cost.: S 49.913_41 Total tJQ dvcrtiscd: Date: 6/21 & 6/28/96 Paper: Tampa Tribune & P.C. Revi ew a Not Requl red Affected Parties 1m Notified a Not Required I ./ ~.! FU'ldfng Source: ~ 9 Capi tal IlIF. I a Operating . [J Other s .. Current Fiscal Yr. COIIDission Action: [J Approved [J Approved w/conditlons a Denied [J ContirAJed to: Attachalents: Bid Tabulation/Bid summary Awropriatlon Code: 315.94221.564100'590-000 C None ~.. . o Printed on recycled paper I ' >:.: " \rl,~ , ,::i , ....... ~ ~ ; : ,',',.: ~ ~~ . . ~ ", ti.~ , , ;~';' (;:' ,:'.,;, ", ;'~" i' , 1 '" 1 ;"... : ~.~. . j.=F' > !.~l ' .' .'F:<.,',o. ,! ;~.':::;' .:f. ." i. OJ ~ . ," .' ....;.. . " ' ..- <O~ ~ . [t" ,', '~.~ './:.'.. ""'.... . " . : ~ .~'.:.,~, '"" .' I . . .' I 1,>,;,.", ,I:. " h'.": , ;::'.: ',' ..... '.. :. ~ . " >, ~ 1 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER BID 149.96 OPENED JULY 12, 1998 lWO TON TRUCK WITH DUMP BODY BID TABULATION ITEM, DESCRIPTION 1 TWO TON TRUCK WITH DUMP BODY ,I, TERMS: " , , DELIVERY:,', , " " SUMMARY OF BID 149.98 , BIDS SOLICITED: , BIDS RECEIVED: NO RESPONSE: "NO-BID" RESPONSE: Do not offer product: Unable to meet spectfleaUons: Cannot be competitive: . ",\ .. ". a".' . ~.. ................ .... ..~ .... ~ "".~' ~ <~~- GATOR FORD TRUCKS, INC. TAMPA. FLORIDA TOTAL PRICE $ 49.952.00 NET 30 90 TO 120 DAYS ,.' 16 2 5 9 7 1 1 , 'L'ir" '-"_.- ~...~ - . " ',.", 1 . ',-',.. \5 SUN STATE INTERNATIONAL TAMPA. FLORIDA TOTAL PRICE $ 49,913.47 NET 30 , 120 TO 180 DAYS ----.;;r _ '. ~Rd-- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum I ~ ',i,(::,:;:},::X;Li:.:;';)Y!L:d Item II: l ~: ~,..'";":,,,:":;,~,i},~,,:,;"'):":'i . MAAtinQ D~tA: r:,~;J~!~~:.i~:::;'~~::~~:!::~ ;; .:.r: "~:.;'.;:~::..:>.:(::; :.;>/../: /~: ~:; SUBJECT: Amendment to Lease Agreement with Philadelphia Phillies RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve amendment to the February 27, 1995 Agreement relating to Jack Russell Stadium between the City and the Phillies extending the minimum term of the Agreement from December 31, 2003, to December 31, 2004 lEI and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: . The current Agreement regarding the Philadelphia Phillies' use of Jack Russell Stadium is dated February 27, 1995. This Agreement has a minimum term ending on December 31, 2003. · On June 20, 1996, the City Commission awarded a contract for renovations to the clubhouse at Carpenter Field which is used by the Phillies. The total approved budget for this project is $758,147. . At a previous meeting on January 29, 1996, the Commission asked staff to see if the Phillies would be willing to extend the term of their Agreement to spring train in Clearwater. However, it was discussed that the Carpenter clubhouse renovations were not contingent on the contract extension. · Mr. Bill Giles, President-CEO-General Partner of the Phillies, approved the attached amendment extending the minimum term of the current Agreement from December 31, 2003 ,to December 31, 2004. (See attached letter.) · The Philadelphia Phillies have been Spring Training in Clearwater for 50 years and the renovations of the Carpenter Field clubhouse are expected to be ready for the 1997 Spring Training season. , ':- N/A' Total CommlllJon Action: D Approved D Approved with Conditions o Denied o Contfnued to: C08t.: Current FI.cal Year Adv.rtIa.d: Funding Source: o Capital ImproYtlment: o Operating: o Other: : :-; , ' " '. . Att~~m~n~~;:)';~.rji};:f~~f:~~~?~t~?' , '" 'Ani.ndlMf1t to'A 't..m.nW~, , ::2IAnei from'Mri:st:wiaiB:,g ~ :il~'if~l~~J~J~;~'~;~,::f~~:~;i::i.:,:;\~;;,:~:::;: { v J IfW;rfJITj~~~8~;f.;lr:f:~~\::~~~j:~:~:.:~~:~.:;~,:/:(:~,:.~: ;':~.~ Submlttd by: Cltye~ o Printed on recycled peper !ill Not Required Aff.cud Partie. D Notified o Not Required Appropriation Code :>~.~.\:;.:t~~ Y.;; (.:~:::).\: '<:. \:"i, ;':.' :.' : ~ ;r';.'~: ~j:.~:~ :,~.:;:'>:: .:~~~;'; ':::~:~:j{:}~~~~~7?~~}iG:~~~i~t?;~f o Nonll I: ..', .J~'.,i )....,.... :~.' ~ . . . . t' ,. ~.. M , . . AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT RELA liNG TO JACK RUSSELL 8T ADIUM THIS AMENDMENT LEASE AGREEMENT is dated this day of , 1996. by and between the City of Clearwater, Florida, a municipal corporation. located in Plnellas County, Florida (the "City-), and the PhilJles, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, whose principal office and mailing address Is at Veterans Stadium, P. O. Box 7575. Broad Street and Pattison Avenue, Philadelphia. Pennsylvania 19101 (the .Club"). The parties in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set , forth below, agree as follows: 1. This Amendment modifies the Lease Agreement Relating to Jack Russell Stadium, which was entered into between the parties on February 27, 1995, (herein "lease Agreement-). 2. Paragraph 1 of the Lease Agreement is hereby amended extending the ~ minimum term of the Lease Agreement from December 31. 2003, to December 31, 2004. 3. Except as expressly modified herein. all other terms and conditions of the , t . ! lease Agreement remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first set forth above. i, : I , ,] :j . ','. . r .1,,' .', I". ' " ' ~' < < < , " ~' . . . .... , . ;, I' .~ '. :r-. ~l _ !, ' ~~; L.~ :~;:~~, ;' ! " ., , , , " , \1'" ~;:. i , " ;. {'I;, . :>,~ , " ',:.;: .' .~: "c ~ ~~'.:j ~ ' , ," [V;.: TI~ :." ~"i... I'~ ,- ; -+ ~ . ,. , , ~r.~ '.' :~. , I ".> . ~. .........! .T , \'il"': ' ~~j: '. '.. ~.! c. .\ ~ ~,.. ... 4 ,';'..' " -:.t.... ... '. .':'\\ ' :'.r! " '<. . '0--,' _.. '" ,",""" ,,~_._- .; .. " '. ~ ,I.. \'. .' T I, . ~.' 4 .> ,....1 . (SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT RELATING TO JACK RUSSELL STADIUM) , Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA , Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner By: Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager , Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Attest: John Caresses, Asst. City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau. City Clerk , Attest: ' THE PH~LlIE5 / , , , ' Secretary 'By: ,J~?~ General P6rtrier ! i I 1 , , , ' , I, J I " 2 .; . ..-- _.~~.".. ...-'~ " ...... -" . ". , <-........T......."~.~..._.. __~ :.:: : ,.... .' ':' ,: ~" " :\c., ,',; '\ I:.. ~ H . !' ' ...' , I' .. " I , , l!' ~ v. . ~:~; '. +. ~ :;. . . .. : ~ . I :.",.: ' ,':r. . '" , . F~"", .....,' ," '. ,\:'.; ,'. " '" " July 3t1996 Ream Wilson) Director Depal1rnent of Parks and Recreation City of Clearwater , City Hall Annex 10 South Missouri Avenue' Clearwatert Florida 34615 Dear Ream: I , , I was pleased to learn from your letter that a contract has been awarded for the agreed upon work at the Carpenter Complex. , , As you requested) enclosed are the executed lease extensions that The Phillies are giving in co~sideration of the successful completion of that work. SincerelYt .~~ William Y. Giles President ! j' I. The Phillic:s. Velerans Sludium . P,O. Box 7575. Philadelphia. PA 19101 ' Execulive Offices: (215) 463-6000 · Sules OUiee: (215) 463.5000 . Ticket OUite: (215) 463.1000 " . ''E '" 1- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum \ 1 '......m',',.." "...., ',.,',..,",w......,,} ~.:'.:;. :;:: .,:~; .~t:(~:;' ;-:,/..'~:":;:.~:::' ~~;;~: Meetln:':,:: _ SUBJECT: Amendment to Lease Agreement between City of Crearwater and Howard G. Hamilton RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION: Approve amendment to paragraph nine (9) concerning parking requirements of the original Lease Agreement; 1m and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: · The City of Clearwater (Lessor) entered into a fifteen (15) year lease agreement on October 28, 1985 with Howard G. Hamilton (Lessee). · The agreement is to operate the South Beach Pavilion concession complex. . Paragraph nine (9) states: · the Lessor will provide nine (9) parking spaces for use by the Lessee's employees at no charge for years 1 through 10. . during years eleven (11) through fifteen (15) Lessor will provide these nine (9) parking spaces at the rate of $25.00 per space per month. · Exhibit B of the original lease indicates the location of the nine (9) reserved parking spaces located within the South Gultview metered parking lot. · In 1993, the South Gulfvlew metered parking lot was converted to an attendant parking lot and the parking spaces designated for use by the Lessee's employees were relocated to a separate, private lot. II The amendment to the Lease Agreement deletes the requirement that Lessee pay Lessor for the parking spaces and deletes Exhibit B of the original lease agreement. NIA N/A N/A N/A User Department: EnglnearlnglPar n Sy tam Cost.: N/A Commission Action: o Approved Total 0 Approved w/Condltlon. o Denied Currant Flacal Vellr 0 Continued to: Reviewed by: Legal Budget Purchulng Risk MlIint. IS ACM Otlglnatlng Department. EnglnearlnglPllrklng tem Othur Advertlaad: Funding Source: o Capital Impl"ll".ment: o OPtnltlng: o Oth. r: Attachmsnts: cYL Ollte: @' S"b,::,.d~ RUu Ch!;~ga~0 '._ >' 0' Printed on reovcled pap.r Papar: '" Not Requlrod Affected Parties: o Notified "'Not Raqulred Amendment to Loa.e Agmt. ApploprJatJon Code N/A o None . . I" " _. ..' .., ._",- --., AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEM'ENT 17 This amendment to the Lease Agreement as entered into by and between the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Lessor," and HOWARD G. HAMILTON, hereinafter referred to as "Lessee;" WHEREAS, the Lessor and the Lessee entered into a Lease Agreement on October 28, 1985; WHEREAS, the Lessor and the Lessee have agreed to amend the Lease Agreement as provided herein; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the conditions and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 9 of the Lease Agreement is amended deleting the requirement that Lessee pay Lessor for nine (9) parking spaces at the rate of $25 per space per month during years 11 through IS of said Lease Agreement. 2. Exhibit B of the Lease Agreement is hereby deleted and Lessor agrees to provide nine (9) parking spaces adjacent to the leased premises for Lessee's use during years 11 through 15 of said Lease Agreement. 3. All other terms and conditions of the lr.ase Agreement shall remain in effect. This amendment shall take effect as of , 1996, when fully executed by both of the parties hereto. ...... r'o . ~"+ ~....... '''' ',... , " >,11, :. " c c ','" J-':;' "'.\. ,0> ~ ,:,', \~.' ,', '( ;;.~ . . j: .~ "::;;. . ~\.:;;:. .... ! ...~l ~ ',t:;: . ~;-:'. : (';. /::>,;, ~. ~ '. f I" ' I :(.;~ I ' , I ~'; <;; , ):':', ~:' ". ". . u ::';:" . 'n:.'; '.' .1"-:"'\ J.. J q". . "t- ;. I., :",:.: ~.; "..4 ~. . >. .' ~~~ " 1'. l ... 1 ' c .. I I I 11 Signature pagt: for Amendment to lease Agreement ' Between City of Clearwater, Florida and Howard G. Hamilton , Countersigned: . , Rita Garvey MayorMCommissioner . Approved as to form and , legal sufficiency: : 1:\Jskinncr~IOII.1t;t CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: Elizabeth M. Deptula City Manager Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau Cily ~ Q.... /'1/ 'fh9-.-.. ~ ~ /~~J\ HOWARD G. HAMILTON ) , 2 ' equipment rental concession and restrooms shall be no earlier than 8:00 a.m. and no , l~.u~ 17 later than lO~OO 8.m. for opening, and no later than one-half hour after sunset for closing. 'rhe beach rental equipment sti8.n be removed from the bench nnd stored by sunset. The use of trucks and other vehicles on the bench will be permitted for distribution and pickup of beach equipment only. The times for distribution and pickup and the conditions under which the vehicles are operated must be authorixed in writing by the City Manager. 8. The Lessor reserves the right to review and approve prices to be charged for all sale and rental items. Prices may be modified when authorized in writing by the City Manager. The Lessee has the right to appeal any decision of the City Manager to the City Commission. List of current prices must be submitted within 20 days of the date of this agreement. 9. In consIderation of the Lessee waiving its right to reimbursement of $30,000 owed to the Lessee by the Lessor under a previous lease agreement, the Lessor will provide nine (9) parking spaces for use by Lessee's employees for years 1 through 10 of this lease. Diiririg years 11 'through 15~ Lessor will provide Lessee nine (9) parking spaces at the rate of $25.00 per space per month. Payment for the rental of these parking spaces will be included ,with the monthly payments made pursuant to paragraphs 10a(1) and lOb(l) of this lease agreement. The placement of the nine (9) parking spaces will be in accordance with a diagram attached as Exhibit B to this lease agreement. In the event this lease is terminated by Lessor prior to the completion of year ten of this lease, Lessor will reimburse Lessee the unused portion of the $30,000 currently owed to Lessee. 10. The Lessee h,ereby covenants and agrees to pay: a. Fot' concessions, sundries and beachwear as follows: - 3 - 'I ',l.' . , , '1,.':';" .-~' , . 'Tr < : . ~:I :( ;,1 :..;', '. . ';ir~i:;': . fl.... , , )',' " ":.1' / ., ," ."' ',\: TT,', ' . i . ~ ."': ~:.;.: \ . '.'t,:,' , " f '~ i~~?;" , ~::' '!)" ,:;: ~ ,. '" :'.1'" 't~ . ~'~./ . : ;'~ :. ~. . " 1 ~t ,..,.: 1l'::' ;f: ~\ ' .".... " < ';', ... .'" , . '.' ." 1 ~ CITY OF CLBARWATBR Interdepartmental CoTTespondence Sheet , TO: Rich Baier, City Engineer , FROM: Tracey Bruch, Parking Facilities Manager~ COPIES: Don Meerians, Assistant Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: SWORN STATEMENTS - SOUTH BEACH PAVILION PARKING SPACFS DATE: May 8, 1996 Attached are three notarized 'statements from myself, Don Meerians and Pete Yauch regarding the parking spaces for the South Beach Pavilion. Each statement describes that we do not have any lmowledge of any written or unwritten agreement that would allow the terms of the lease to be'modified,or changed in any way. Please let me know if there is anything else required. AU. (3) , \ ,N- , , ~ L - 01"'1 ~ 1 . - I tv- ~...... ~ --tL. ~ ~~ to " ,I [~ Il~ ,~\2... I ~ {---- -- .... U L MAY 8 19;?~; , , 1..-......" ~:! i ;1. l I r. .. . ...l . v ',.. ~ . ~ , ., . L' ' .~ " I In 1992/93, the South Gulfview Parking lot was converted from a metered operation to an Attendant operation. This conversion required some modifications to the parking spaces designated for Mr. Hamilton's use. Mr. Hamilton's parking spaces were relocated to a separate, private lot at approximately the same'location as the original spaces. I ' , , " I am not aware of any written or mtwritten agreement that would allow the terms of the lease, and particularly the terms relating to Mr. Hamilton's payment for the spaces, to be modified or changed in any way. . ' ~Q.~.~ Tracey A. . Bruch' 5/g/% , , " .' ;",1 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) ~.. .. BEFORE ME, the undersigned, personally appeared TRACEY A. F. BRUCH ~ who executed the foregoing instrument and who is personally , known t~ me or has produced f1/-~.J~~~,p'f'J ~....<,,~as identification. r../2,,-,y!( em, ~h~ No'tary Publl'C FflCIA OTAR SEA ' , NEVAM PAYNE . , e v Ii .A1. ..j}/1 Y fiJ 13 Nor ARY PUBUC 5T ATE OF FLORIDA /V COMMISSION NO. CC505946 MY COMMISSION EXP. NOV. 15.1999 ", ., ',~.' I.fiwl ~ /996 " -.(." II,! ,', < " . , , ,'.tl .~ ; : ,\ t ,; ~ ,,' i.. ~ :'.1 l " , In 1992/93, the South Gulfview Parking lot was converted from a metered operation to an Attendant operation. This conversion required some modifications to the parking spaces designated for Mr. Hamilton's use. Mr. Hamilton's parking spaces were relocated to a separate, private lot at approximately the same location as the original spaces. I am not aware of any written or unwritten agreement that would allow the tenns of the lease,'and particularly the teons relating to Mr. Hamilton's payment for the spaces, to be modified or changed in any way. /~ " ,.;.. . 0..1 ~~Cl ~.:..._ Donald A. eerians ' " '.. ... , . ',' .,; < , '.' ~ ,- .; < r' > ' , , , .. 'I'. ' STATE,QFFLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) I ", , ' . , I', , ' BEFORE 1v1E, the undersigned, personally appeared DONALD A. , MEERIANS , who executed the foregoing instrument and who is personally known to me or haS produced f/c f.t?~~~" t.,..u~~.J as identification. ~~~ /)1, (1:rt.e-- Notary Public AJ~vt1 /Y1. ~y'..tJE fA A S AL NEVAM PAYNE NOTARY PUDUCsrATE OF FJ.ORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC505946 MY COMMISSION EXP. NOV. IS,lm ~! '-I1L.u! ~J /91 b I: ' I '\-~ , I" , I ~~". ;... '. j, I. ' ...'~x.!,;"b..~j;",.III'"i"k\i.,....~- - . .......~., ...-.....__...'...~.Tr '~C'..'~"~1"'~.:.~_"..>.~;4 ~.~......... :'...~... T .' , " ..".... c . ,', -,' . ~ " . . I' While serving as City Traffic Engineer for the City of Clearwater, the South Gulfview parking lots were reconfigured from metered parking to a cashier operated facility. As part of this reconfiguration, the parking spaces designated for the use of Mr. Hamilton were relocated to a separate, private lot at approximately the same location as the original spaces. The same number of spaces as defined in his lease agreement, dated October 28, 1985, were provided. However, I am not aware of any written or unwritten agreement that would allow the terms of the lease, and particularly the terms relating to his payment for the spaces, to be modified or changed in any way. ~ 6} !9'l? 'I , . Before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Peter J. Yauc~ who executed the foregoing instrument and who is personally known to me 'or has produced ~/, :e"l.~~ as identification. , ',~':: , . ' , ~~It'- '7')7. ~r~ , Notary Public , ;J~tlr/ A. ~Y,Ne ,c"," " ' A NEVAM PAYNE NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CCS05946 MY COMMISSION EXP. NOV. 15,1999 \:.~: ....!.. . l. '. " ; ~: ,I , ;. , , ~'#-~ 'i~L~ ~ iY.2-~~e&~ 7'J!A-t 6) /99 b . . . ~ ~., . .... , " ',' ..... ~ " .' . )' ", . :_ t " " " \ .~ ," .- " , '.. )' .~. :~. .' -i' . .-<, , , " . I ,":,.;'. '. ' !::'~::-. ':' . :;:.:. ':. " .. ' ~~~b'~~*~~.~~~Jt>'.!"~of.N..w-~ . . ,~.o.~ . ..~.~o , , ~ LO', .' "r~. .tA :\w CLEAR\V A TER CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum \% Item # Moeting Date SUBJECT: Morton Plant Main Parking Lot, Inter..connector SarJitary Sewer Extension Contract RECO:MMENDA TIONIMOTlON: Approve award of Morton Plant Main Parking Lot, Inter-c.onnector Sanitary Sewer Extension Contract with Kimmins Contracting Corporation of Tampa, Florida in the amount of $38,015.00, . lID and that Ule appropriate oOiciaJs be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: · The City proposes to replace the existing Morton Plant Pump Station No 7 located immediately west of the main Morton Plant Hospital building which is south of Jeffords Street and east of Druid Road. This pumping station is becoming undersized due to the expanding operations of the hospital complex and its location is in conflict with the day to day hospital seIVice operations. Post, Buckleyt Schuh and Jernigan, Inc. is presently working on construction drawings for the replacement of the pump station together with the associated appurtenances of sanitary sewer and force main. . The new Morton Plant Pump Station is proposed to be placed on hospital property at the west end of Jeffords Street between the Morton Plant/Mease Foundation Building and the heliport. A portion of the necessary sanitary inter- connector sewer between the present pump station site and,the proposed pump station site has already been constructed by Morton Plant as a part of their general campus improvements. The section between Druid Road and the new pump station site at the west end of Jeffords Street remains to be constructed. Please see the attached location drawing. . Engineering previously discussed with Morton Plant staff the options of extension of the inter-connector sanitary sewer from its present temporary tenninus at Druid Road to the proposed pump station site. Morton Plant does not want to intenupt the operations of the Morton PlantIMease Foundation on the southwest comer of Jeffords Street and Druid Road. The City does not want to lay the new sanitary sewer within the pavement of Druid Road and the intersection RevIewed by: OriginatIng t ~ ~ Costs: $38.015.00 Commb:sJon Action Legal ~ Engineering ~ (Current FY) X Approved \r Budget ~ ' User Dept. ~ Funding Source: Approved .. - " ." " . w/conditions - Purchas'~fl/ Capt. Imp. X Denied Risk Mgmt. N/A Advertised: Operating Cont'd to IS N/A Date: Other ::. -~ ' Paper: Not required: N/A antE: .. Affected parties Appropriation Code Is) Attachments: notified Sulml10d lifi 6/!ku 315.96632-563700.535-000 location Drawing City Mana r "j ,Not Required X continued : Morton f'Wlt PumP Stttion 7 Dive~1on Stnllary Awlld to Klmmlonugf1 · Page 2 continued: Agenda Memo M Morton Plant Main Parking Lot, Inter-connector Sanitary Sewer Extension Contract I~ with Jeffords Street because of the obvious traffic problems created for both citizens and the hospital. The remaining alternative is to lay the new sanitary sewer through the westerly portion of the Morton Plant main parking lot and to Ujack and bore" the sanitary sewer beneath Druid Road from the parking lot. This solution would ordinarily be included in the construction contract for the installation of the pumping station., however, Morton Plant advised us that they were immediately embarking upon a complete reconstruction of their main parking lot. Morton Plant naturally did not want the City to come back after the completion of the new parking lot to install the new sanitary sewer. Engineering advised the hospital staff that it was not possible for the City to complete engineering plans, obtain construction bids and award a construction contract using the City's ordinary procurement procedures within the time frame required by Morton Plant. Morton Plant was not willing to postpone the reconstruction of the parking lot as they wanted to complete their extended campus reconstruction program as soon as possible. Morton Plant intends to issue notice to proceed with the parking lot to Kimmins on August 12, 1996. . The solution which satisfies all concerns is to have the short section of sanitary sewer which would be in contlict with the main parking lot be installed at the same time as the parking lot construction. Preferably by the same contractor to ensure construction coordination and avoid conflicts between two different contractors working in the same tight working area. To accomplish this solution, City staff rapidly completed a portion of the sanitary sewer design in the area of the main parking lot and provided the design. scope of work and a list of construction quantities to the Morton , Plant staff. This scope of work was included by Morton Plant in their discussion with contractors interested in working for the hospital. Morton Plant has selected Kimmins Contracting Corp. to construct the hospital parking lot. Kimmins quotation for the installation of the City's sanitary sewer work is in the amount of $3 8,0 15.00. Engineering Services has detennined this to be a fair and reasonable price for the proposed sanitary work. This arrangement for the installation of City's utility work in cooperation with Morton Plant is similar to the City'sjoint project agreements with the FOOT and Pinellas County except that Kimmins would work directly for the City in accomplishing the sanitary work. . We reconunend award ofa construction contract to Kimmins Contracting being in the best interests of the City for the following reasons: 1. The work is an exception to the nannal bidding procedures because it is impractical to solicit competitive bids because the nonnal bid process would not meet the project time requirements imposed by Morton Plant nor would Morton Plant allow a different contractor working for the City to pecfonn the City's work. Their objection is that two different contractors working on the hospital property at the same time, in a limited work space and with the tight time schedule imposed on the hospital contractor to complete the parking lot work would cause unnecessary conflicts and delays to the hospital project.; 2. The work will greatly reduce operational impact to Morton PlantIMease Foundation by being perfonned across the street from the Foundation in the hospital parking lot.; 3. Operational impact to Morton Plant Hospital will ~e avoided by the sanitary sewer construction being done at the same time as the parking lot is closed for reconstruction; 4. Significant traffic disruption in the intersection of Jeffords Street and Druid Road will be avoided; and 5. The City will realize significant savings in restoration costs of the main parking lot which is being reconstructed and restored by Morton Plant. . The of Clearwater Purchasing Department concurs with the award of this contract under Section 2.564 Exception to Bid Procedures of the Clearwater Code. ., The remainder of the inter-connector sanitary sewer along the south side of Jeffords Street west of Druid Road will be constructed as a part of the pump station contract. . Funding is available in project 315-96632. Sanitary Collection Renewal and Replacement, to fund this contract. '1") ~1O OlD wi --I :,:; ~ Z I- <( :IN 0 I- r-Z- et:<:(D- O-.JU1 20-0 :c S'su --- N -w C\1 0 uL() JrI <( C\1 - -.J ~ .n, ';0 n .., t'tOl d ~ N SO/ LZ <t1 .-:l "'lOI ~ o::t ~ 0 "- ..... N Olh(jQ 09 .~;--J 1? u a:: UOS uO l , 5.,...J -:J c: QI ~ E . QJ o . 1II .... ~ 0 ow t-- =tt: ,-- ~= N s:I c,.....~ .... .... =tt:.... ........ . I rIJ .tn..... .... .... .J ~ ..e CIl l.. ''It riiil 2. .... 0 0 ....Ew .... 0 . ,~~ 5 I@ --Y fL c L{) ,-- '-... N 12"- L cntIJ s::I ....0 u.... CD~ = Sill c:I 0.. uo :.~ lSJO ...dn I:l 1-4 I S6 , (f) I D 11'I0::: :!o lL- 06 lL- Woo ~! l'rs L 1") ~ T"""" N ,,- ..- . eRe, Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum \ a w"'~'''''.'''''.''~ ........'''...'* \ Item ,: ~:":'::~:~f:\~~:~:)'{J:(~;,:::,',;:)'~,';;J.~ Mooting Oalo: rl~~~~j~J SUBJECT: Land Development Code Amendment - Revising Appointment Standards for the Planning and Zoning and Development Code Adjustment Boards. (LDCA 96-16) RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION: Receive proposed code amendment and refer to the City Clerk for advertising for public hearings. 1m and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The City Commission has directed staff to make code amendments which will broaden the Commission's ability to make appointments to the Planning and Zoning and Development Code Adjustment Boards. The attached ordinance serves that purpose. This ordinance will require review by both the Planning and Zoning and Development Code Adjustment Boards. Staff will attempt to expedite consideration of this ordinance in order to facilitate appointments to a vacancy on the Development Code Adjustment Board. RevIewed by: Leg" Bud;I' PurchHlnlll Rf.k Mgmt. 18 ACM Orlglnatlng Dopartrncmt: CENTRAL ;ro User Department: Costs: Commission Action: o Approved Totlll 0 Approved w/Condltlon. o Denied Current FJ.eal Year 0 Canr/nued to: Dete: Funding Source: o Capltll ImprolllllMlnt: o Operating: o Othlr: Attachments: ORDINANCE NO. 6076.96 Orh.r NA AdvlnJ..d; ~ Paper: I!J Not RequIred Affected Parties: [] Notlfled IBI Not fkqulr-.d Approprlotron Code o None ,ORDINANCE NO. ~075-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CllY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION 36.033(2)(a), CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD; AMENDING SECTION 36.035(2)(a), CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP ON THE DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT , BOARD; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: \ C\ Section 1. Section 36.033(2)(a), Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 36.033. Planning and zoning board. * * * * * * (2) Composition, appointment and term. r.. (a) The planning and zoning board shall consist of seven members who shall be residents of the city. The city commission shall, whenever possible. appoint the members of the board with persons possessing professional or acquired experience or interest in the fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture or growth management. Such members shall serve at the pleasure of the commission. Section 2. Section 36.035(2)(a), Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 36.035. Development code adjustment board. ... ... ... * * * (2) Composition, appointments and terms. (a) The development code adjustment board shall consist of five members who shall be residents of the city. The members of the board shall. whenever possibhL possess professional training or acquired experience in the fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture or development control. The members shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the commission. Ordinance No. 6075-96 ,\",,,....>~~... >... ,-!, ~ ",,.. "'~ ................,......-... . ..... .,',-! . ., '... . . , ' ri,", ' . r '. ~ ,'. " >" . ' 1", > . ,'. . .., " , " ," J~.~ ",' ' /.>. !c ~ ' j ~ '. , '. :1(, -:',' ;.;~ ~ : r:';~" ". ~;~, :',. .c, :' ",' \ . . .' ~ l~ ~ : , . ' Ii.' " ~<~~: '. c :' .' " " ~ ~ ,.. . ,'.," " -::r,'.;. .(' I ,~,. ' ....~ ". ':~. .; "j.. " ~! ;:; ~:, . " ' :. , '. " .....' . , " ...;, .'. I ',:, ' "I ,;c': , . , ", "."'. I :.c< . j.j':.... ',i'" ,':"':, ' . ,I" ", I".:;',' .\.....::- . ( ,. ' .. '. .' " ' .~. .' .;t t" '. '....: ',': .. " ", (;: ~)- . ~.t~.:. .,c. . ~rl" " ' . .."......0 . ': I , '.T" .' ",', I t, ,I ! Sectlon.-3.. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL, READING' AND ADOPTED Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ' ij~AL , Pamefa K.'Akin City Attorney " , ""/ ' " 2 . .,i , ~. " . ' . .~rtW~~":"~--:-" " ..,~~_... Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Attest: , Cynthia E. Goudeau. City Clerk Ordinance No. 6075-96 ~..,~..u__~ ..... . . '. ' TO: COPIES TO: COMMISSION JUL 2 6 1996 PRESS ' CLERK I ATTORNEY The Honorable Mirr and Members of the City Conunission Pamela K. Aldn~ City Attorney ~U-. MEMORANDUM \~ FROM: SUBJECT: Requirements for Board Members DATE: July 25, 1996 The Commission expressed concern about the Code requirements for membership on the Planning and Zoning Board and the Development Code Adjustment Board. These Boards have specific mandated qualifications which are vague and difficult to apply. Attached for your review is a chart outlining the current membership requirements and the authority for those requirements for the following City Boards: Municipal Code Enforcement Board; Planning and Zoning Board; Development Code Adjustment Board; Design Review Board; Community Relations Board; and Neighborhood and Affordable Housing Advisory Board. Section 36.033, Clearwater Code of Ordinances, requires members of the Planning and Zoning Board to possess professional or acquired experience or interest in the fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture, or growth management. Section 36.035, Clearwater Code of Ordinances, requires members of the Development Code Adjustment Board to possess professional training or acquired experience in the fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture or development control. Experience has shown that it is often difficult to find citizens to serve on these Boards who possess the professional training set forth in the Code; and detennining whether an individual has "acquired experience" can be problematic. Based on my review of the requirements and after receiving the recommendations of Scott Shuford and P&Z and DCAB, I recommend that the requirements for membership on the Planning and Zoning Board and the Development Code Adjustment Bow be amended. Previous technical knowledge or experience does not appear to as important as creatiug a sense of "balance" within the Boards. Staff has indicated to me that the ideal Board should reflect a broad spectrum of our community, including representation from real estate interests, neighborhoods, the development community, environmentalists, business people and wmmunity "generalists." I recommend amending both ordinances to insert language simil~ to that in Section 2.668, which sets forth the requirements for membership on the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Section 2.668 states that "[t]he membership of each board shall, whenever possible, include. . ." Insertion of the phrase "whenever possible" would still allow the Commission to seek out and appoint Board members with specific ,i , ::, '~ ,'~~ "~.':'" .',:':;"~:-.;.fl.'.'.,,~ . '. , , I'" :....., " " : lH . ;' :' ~ j , , .. I ~. ;'~::.' ~ }./: . .,;., , ~" . ~.~. :.1 . ...,.-~.. '. . ti"~.i ',:- -: :" d-- ~;.fJ,'.. ' ~::~:.:r~:' :'.~ . ~~~.~',~;.: . ~" ~..1': '. :\ <~.. . ,,",. . ,'F:,~" . ;.~ : ~. '. ,.. ,; ,I; . aj"iJ',- u, . ~ ? . l I~ / .' . ~c ;.': ',:' . ~,. . I::;':.;,':' , .'01'," . !~:;/'::.." ", ,;'::;:.:J' , .'~ ..r~ '. I ,.~~', . :',~,' , :~\~; . /..:'~'.. L' .;~j.: ~ J' 'r:" },,', : l {~;:' .:.' ... " , ... " "', . . . ~~~'.::.~' . : I''''' " , ~i~( . .,,' n'", . 0.... ':.>:; \ ~ (.. ';(',.> :!~': '. . Il:~:;;;.'. "1': . '. . ~ j~~~r:' ; ':,',: ' " 11,1.. ," ,", \. ~'i :~:" :',' . < ,tf'. .:,',:. . '. ~,?;:::': ':..,',',' .'.o .' (' . t ~.. . ,<-~. ~ . c - " "~ ,... '. I . ,,', professional'training or acquired experience if such qualified persons are available, without absolutely ~iring the Commission to do so. PKAlJAS/jas Attachment Copies: Elizabeth M. ,Deptula, City Manager Scott ~huford, Director of Central Permitting " ' , I .. I:\jskinncr\board.mcm , ; j, I i I 1 ' 1 i i I i I I I " < :~, :.., l.' ',Ce ! ! i ,'! I " . r . ~.." I I 1, .1.. ; , I'. i ' , I, ! 'J c. ~ " " 2 ~ ;..~ : .' . ;~K:/" " " " .____.__u..--'_."<_ ,..._......__.,...._____.-...~. ~ . . ..,. ......H._'...-....II__........'...-:-'""........ ............__....~...~t...>~...... .. . J ~ o"SlC"i lto4~\CI o .._ ,!!OOc= .~ ~.8 UN~ j i . fi~1 OMc;n lto4l!~ o 0.... ~'ff .... O'~~ . u ;e. .. 1 i ~ j ~"&~i' ~ or .s] ~.t.: c.s.. ~~~ lill fl .; .~.~ 0 .!i iOO R MmU~S::i JS cs (3.fJ H 'fl ~ a .j & ~ .5 ~ ~ .~ :; 8 -8 fr'~ ~ .c ~ ~.~ ~ !i j ~ Ii ~).8.a~&)8 . ]lll~1 ~i~ tt * * * ~ * fa bO'~ I oo g ~ .... o -8, U 11 &~ -1.0 U('t'l lto4= o 0 B~ C600I o .g U I-f ~ . ~V") fta O~ ~ = o 0 t' ':;2 u~ oo I . I-f . I f 0... . c.~!!fl !.~..:15f~i = 1 ~ 0 -I ~ .~ u. .... -= !a t IU..... -= c:... ~ ~ Ua'fi ~ u~cs~ C600I 8 ~ .~ .S ~ J~ -!1 .~ ~ u 0,,"" .., . ov.... _~. .g ~ 0 r! ~ - 1:1 .1!l ~ 0 ~ ~ j -s t.I) .... 1:1 e.!! oo ~ ~ .... 1:1 e u r::l U -8 ~.8 e 0 r::l U U c:... oS . 8 ~.... Yl'1-f a ~ 8 ~:s ~ e 8 i e;,;o~E1 ] ~~. "ij W~.8 &~:a 8 w1.8 &H ~ 8 ~ .~ .., ..,.~ ~ t ~ .~ ~ ~ '1:: .11 ~ ~'~~~~~p. ~<)1)1~~t ****lU_6h **** u;!'t;S ] ] I .~ ~ .r ~ ~ 1 i f ! ~ . . .' ..' ~~ ~ ~ ~ I g 'i 'ill'. ~ -a rs~ lJ.c:i~.8 i 6.~ l~!~'if] i] 1'18i ~ I~~ji~j 'S'8 -! ~ l1 j ~:3 ~ p. ~ e i':! 'Sc:l~U8eE1ca~t:l .~ ~ IU 0 ....... & I CI "1- a .- ~ u' ~ 8~1~~~_ ~6' ~ ] 'S ~ ~ ii ~] f.l i · f.l . i'l~ iJ!~ i ~~JI~j ia<:e~EU9~~ep.~e it it * it U)i3QO. ~ca. a I ~ c u '8, u !i &3 UN 'Sg ~l ~ II .~ ~ 1 I f :~ Ei~ ,8.d U 8' :=.. =8 .so~ oS1~ 00 e. ..j f.l .g J! ~ .. S 4!l J! ~ ;@ J .! ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ i 1 :R ~ 'i f.l ~ 's ~ ~ ~ .~ i 8 ~ rg ~ .8 ~ 'S ~8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 E ~:~ ~ ~ 1 ....!3~ ~ i't:l~c:lu=~ .~ 8 .t::. ! 'B ....s ~ -B .g.c ~ ~ G ~ 8 ~ c;. a .s .~ 8:.f! 'S ~] ;1 ~ oS tb E i i ~ ~~ ~ j ~ :~ ~ ~ cg ~ ri.~ i.~.a ~J!~~ ~f.l.ai! ~.j&i:~ i1l &i: ~ 1: ~ :;l 'a ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ :;! '2 ~.:( l ."fi. .~~. 8~u.. 80. e N I , ; I ~ o ~ ~ J ." .. ~ if rf "! G'i .. rf~ ~ j .rfl & j as i! ~'~ i bO ~ ~ .Ff i ,E! ] I Jlli .. ,~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ !l~~ & u ~ O~~ It-I d ~ 00'8 8~~ , B ... 'B II t; fi 1:i a ... u bl?bt':f i ~ ~ -8 .g .8 i .g .a .~ i 5 .-... ~ ~ .~ .~ .~ ~ ~~ ~ as ~ ~ ~ as as t;3 CIS as ~. ,~ .8 !.81 ~ ~ .8 [.8 ~ .8.. ~ ~ ~ e .~ . Wi] I ~ ~ 0 I M ~ ~ l:i ~ ~ ~ .~ t) Ii' ~ ~ ~ I ~.~ ~ ~ ~ -< ~ ..( ~ ~~8 1.8~fi ~ j ~.8i ui .8~8~8t ~Ob ~ a~ s Ie ~~~e~ . ~ 6 .- e ~ . .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !! 8 :s ~.~ .fl .~ .fl ,~ ] ~ ,~ B ,~ ~ ~~ ,.'~ 0 ,~ o'~ ~ ~ ~ 13 oM .s .s .13 .s .~ ] .s ~ ~ ~ .! ~ Jj ~ .; ~ .s 0 U) .c ,a It-I "'S ~ "'S It-I c:l 0 ~ i "-< 'l:: ~ .... ~ z ~ CI;l '+-< l~l~ ~~ ~~ lj~ m~~~~~!~~~~ .. .. .. .. 0 .. 40' .. Z:::.S .. ~ . 0 .. Q,:.. 0 .. 0 .. 0 ('f'l ., ' " ~Q ~at'ed. ~ r. a:.t:um to: Barre t Knqin_dng ltdm1n1at.rat1on City of Clearwat:4Jr P. O. Box 4748 Clearwa~, Fl. 34'18-4148 EASEMENT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) cash in hand paid to it, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the benefits to be derived therefrom~ Morton Plant Life Services, Inc., , a Florida Cor,poration 2855 Gulf To Bay Boulevard Clearwater, Fl. 34619-4087 does hereby grant and'convey to the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, an easement over, under and across the following described land, lying and being situate in theCount~,of Pinellas, state of !Florida, to-wit: A Ten (10') foot water main easement lying 5' each side of all water mains up to and including all meters, AND an ingress and egress easement for refuse and garbage collections and City of Clearwater service and utility vehicles, all lying within the following described tract: A portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida being more particularly described by the legal descriptions for Parcel "A" and Parcel "C" in EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto, and also being dapicted in EXHIBIT \\B" attached hereto. ~ c The CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, shall have the right to enter upon the above described premises and to construct, install and maintain thereon any water facilities and to inspect and alter such water facilities from time to time. ,- I 1 1:- I, : Page 2 - Water Main Easement Portion of Lot 2, RESUB OF BASKINS REPLAT Grantor: Morton Plant Life Services, Inc. Grantee: city of Clearwater, Florida' Date: Ju.L'I I (J , 1996' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party hereto has caused these presents to be duly executed by its proper officers thereunto authorized and its seal to be hereunto affixed, this .I 01:h- day of Ju. (y , 1996. Signed, sealed and delivered , in the presence of: MORTON PLANT LIFE INC. By: " ~ Ai.............p t' ~ .tJ.,<-o_l...4~ N~n~ u\. ~ WITNESS l)/ A ~ ~ L. OU<-C-f 114-".J Witness' Printed signature t, Pres1dent ~ " , ATTEST: 4kw tf! 4- Barbara A. Wise Secretary/Treasurer > .~. . .: ~ ~ . ~t!.-t'~ ~ h A~ WITNESS ~#....~ nt!,y.enc;~' ~Y7 {J;?~ W~tn8..' Printed signature (CORPORATE SEAL) "I: . " STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELlAS . . ,i . . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this )O~day of . I.ll~:- ----~.~,1996 by Denton W. Crockett, President of Morton Plant Life Se~Florida Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. ., , .*J, ~~P":"r~r"-'r""\.~""'..."".,.~..~ l, ;. ,.'" ,t... C. .''''~nl'-.I (" .lrl-,' ....t/ .....""'L I: .r:~~' , 4.J~.. 01::..:,: ".. .~.'..\.:,. .~,~::...::~!l::~ t'" "'~l' ~, ,',' '" '. ,." "U .'-'" ".~ \\ t:..,.~ ~~. ""'""'"'...... I~_. ~ 44 ..~:..t_~, ,I'" U"1iIP"{~ '\' ,..,. "~I''''.''O ..'I. ~ ...~.t.,;I. J.".t" +&: ,,",,' .-.......... , ~~ # ~\ t:...\,~,_....c.! exp. OF F\.O 5;1 p'i' 1I.1~'r3 ...- --'-1-'" >. , ( {" , '. " [~ Personally Known [ ] ,Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced NIA "' '. , . 'J ~ .....1. " ' , , . ".f, c . f c \' ,. " I,. ." j/. . I '. I. : , I, I i I: , j, ; . , , " EXHIBIT "A' Legal Description ,PARCEL "A" That certain portion of Lot 2, BASKIN'S REPLAT, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 42, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, lying in section 17, Town~hip 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, described as .follows:, From the northwesterly comer of said Lot 2 of a resubdivision of BASKIN'S REPLAT as recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 42, Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida, and run thence N. 89046'01" E., 60.00 feet along the northerly line of said Lot 2, thence S'. 00013'59" E., 190.00 feet, for a Point of Beginning; thence continue S. 00013'59" E, 165.35 feet; thence N. 48025'10" E., 210.73 feet; thence N. 41034'50" W., 34.81 feet; thence S. 89"46'01. W., 135.20 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.34 Acres, More or Less. Together with A tract of land lying within Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and being more particularly described as' follows: Commence at the West % corner of said section 17 for a Point of Reference; thenCe N. 89046'01" E. along the East-West centerline of said Section 17 for 2233.81 feet; thence leaving said line S. 00013'5911 E. for 405.21 feet; to the Point of Beginning; thence N. 48024'08" E., for 310.53 feet, thence N. 89046'01. E., for.9.37 feet, thence '5: 48025'10" W., for 322.93 feet, thence N. 00013'59" W., for 8.12 feet, to the Point of Beginning, and containing 1946 square feet, more or less. Total of 0.38 Acres More or Less. PARCELUC" All that certain tract or parcel of land situated, lying and being in section 17, Township 29 South. Range 16 East, in the City if Clearwater, County of Pinellas 'and State of Florida, more particularly bounded and described as folfows: , ! Page 2 - EXHIBIT MAM Leaal Description From the Northeast corner of Block 2 of RESUB OF BASKIN'S REPLAT, recorded in Plat Book, 24, Page 42, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; run S. 89~46101" W., along the North line of said Block 2, 60.01 feet for a Point Of Beginning; thence run South OOQ3T03" W., 150.02 feet; thence run N. 89046'01" E., 60.01 feet; thence run S. 00Q37'03" W., along the East line of said Block 2, 1227.93 feet; thence run S. 69021'23" W., 314.28 feet; thence S. 52Q2B'5411 W., 215.0 feet to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Block 2; , thence N. 39001'06" W., 1469.27 feet; thence run N. 00013'59" W. (along a line parallel to and 60 feet easterly of the West line of said Block 2) 109.20 feet (109.02 feet Field); thence run N. 48025'10" East, 322.93 feet; thence run N. 89046'0111 E. (along a line parallel to and 150 feet southerly of the North line of said Block 2) 901.75 feet; thence run N. 00037'03" Eo, 150.02 feet; thence run N. 89046'01" E., along the north line of said Block 2, 200.00 feet to the Point Of , Beginning. Containing 33.44 Acres More or ress. Less All of that cetain parcel of land situated, lying and being in Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, more particularly bounded and described as fonows: " From the Northeast corner of Block 2 of RESUB OF BASKIN'S REPLAT, recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 42, Public Records of PineJlas County, Florida; thence S. 89Q46'01" W., along the North line of said block 2, 60.01 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S. 00037'03" W'I 150.02 feet; thence N. 89046'01" E., 60.01 feet; thence S.,Oo037'03" W. along the east line of said Block 2. 249.31 feet, thence leaving said line S. 89046'01" W., 270.00 feet more or less to the centerline of a creek; thence Northwesterly along said centerline, 370.00 feet more or less to a point on a line being 200.00 feet South of an paraltel to the EasUWest centerline of said Section 17; thence N. 89046'01" E. along said line, 260.00 feet more or less; thence N. 00037'03" E., 150.02 feet to a point on the South right-of~way line of Gulf To' Bay Boulevard; thence N. 89046'01" E. along said line, 200.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2.95 Acres More or 'Less. Total of 30.49 Acres More or Less. I " EBIMO\BAYSIDE PAY LGL 062596 PARCEL ~SA..J · . . ! 10 . EXHIBIT liB" a I! I -- , PARCE~ "C"7 \ I . " :i . \ L':" \ , '. ,~. " I '. " . .. ~\ S'IDEWALJC EASEMENT 'POR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) cash in hand paid to ---- . the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the benefits ,to be derived therefrom, Thomas R. Omalley & Pamela J. Mills a Florida General Partnership 906 North Belcher Road Clearwater. Fl. 34625 ~'. ) , does hereby grant and convey to the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, an easement over, under and across the following described land, lying and being situate in the ,County of Pinellas, state of Florida, to-wit: The legal description of the land to which the easement is granted is hereto ,attached to this document. The easement granted to the City on said lot shall run along the northern boundary of said lot along Palmetto Street., The easement shall extend five feet south into said lot and extend the length of the northern boundary. I' ' I. I ~ : I. , " This easement is for sidewalk purposes. The CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORID~, shall have the right to enter the above described premises and inspect ' the placement and dimensions of said sidewalks to - insure .conformance with City specifications and thereafter maintain same from time to time; and that, , " The GENERAL PUBLIC shall have full and free use of said sidewalk at any time and all times for traveli~g purposes. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be 6 . duly executed by its proper officers 'thereunto authorized this 12th day of July , 19 93 . , ' ,( z " Signed, seale4 and delivered in the presenoe of: A FLORIDA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP .~.9.m~ .L. ~ WITN SS be6cro.. h _L. QAe Witnes.' Printed Signature /L/&~ GENERAL PARTNER Addroa. city/Stat.e/zip 'DeJnQ~~ L. ~ Witnea.' Pr nted Signature PARTNER, ~oiWo/\~ L.~ WITNESS STATE Op FLORIDA COUNTY OP PINELLAS The foregoing instrumen was acknowledged >>efore this July , 19 93 by-rl/6/1A-S. R. OI!1l!!4INc:s.-f1v1,;LA- ~. t1IU S (or agent) on behalf of (name of partnership) -,1 a partnership. He/She is p~rsonally known to me~or has produced (name type of identification) as identification and (check one) ( ) did ( ) did not take an oath. 12th day of , partner Type/print/stamp name of acknowledger ',\ Title or rank, and Serial No., if any I;:: * * NADCN! A. HARPER N*Y~\tol Fk1MI ..~.m!Jlpne JU\. If._ Clout... co 111030 . .....--... . ~ ~ ,;l ..: '. 1 . I Le~al Description I, " ,', Begin at the Northwest comer afLot One (1), Pinellas Groves Subdivision, in the Southeast quarter (SE Y.) ofSection'12, Township 29 South, Range IS East, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 15 of the Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida, and run thence East along the North bOWldary of said Lot One (1), a distance of 100 feet for a Point of Beginning; from the Point of Beginning thus established continue East along the North boundary of said lot, a distance of222.14 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot One (1); run thence South along the East boundary of said Lot One (1), a distance of 168.88 feet; run thence West parallel to the South boundary of said Lot One (1), a distance of 222.23 feet; run thence North in a straight line 168.93 feet to the established Point of Beginning, LESS the North 15.00 feet for additional R.O.W. of County Road 215, and LESS the East 18.00 feet for additional R.O.W. of Belcher Road, and LESS the legal description in Final Judgment recorded in O.R. Book 4667, Pages 758 and 759, Pinellas County Records, as follows: The West 17.00 feet of the East 50.00 feet ofllie Northeast quarter (NE ~) of , the Northeast quarter (NE Y. )of the Southeast quarter (SE ~ ) of Section 12, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Less the North 30.00 feet and Less the South 480.00 feet. Being a part of Lot One (1), Pinellas Groves Subdivision, m the Southeast quarter (SE ~) of said Section 12, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 15 Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida. , . , i , I':.' ' ,~. . , ' -, ' " 1-':': i ' j" \ " ," :.1 ; :' ~. .1"., LEOALJ r :' _. ~'tl;,...,..~. .(:"~f '~~I'j ..r....;..;.....~........~... ..........., ~ ~ . . ~ . . . " , < p' ,'. . . . . ~, . ~ t... .,. .:. .' ,u ... ~ ~". ; ;. L 'PALMETTO STREET (C.R. 550) ,," .... . , o ~I , ~ ! I t". '., . , " Su'Ject Property , , O"\l~<O 1 c,~ ~"f>\.V ~..-" \6 t>~ 2 ~\C~ 2 , ' ~~S ~ ' Q 9\...-"9 '~"'P-O D:: W :c u ....J W CD I I \ , I , ~ .:: " .. , .~: '. ~ ;.' . ..I' ;1', ' I i' j , ';. '" , , <{,. ;!' ~~ ., , :;.": ~ ,I .'.,. . i I. . ',\' tiOIE: ThIs Is not a survey! I ~~r.ak Fifso,DlT :. , Sal:. 12-l2QS-RlSE O'Ycllly.dwa Dw, b)': RWS 7/2D/88 II '.. ,:;, \ ~ ~...... ..WI'-,'i'l'"", ..'J':rhJttitf+.......~..-.".. ~,\:;,:,:~.~,;, . ~YI ~\ f ~ < _ c. ' .~;:: : ~, \. ;.. " . ~,' . >..". -.' ',.:." ," '" 't':'> \~. ' . ..1","- <I -, ~,-.'o :. . ", ~::. .' ::~}.~'~' J. . ." ~,\? ;~~~~i~!' .,. . . 1'1'" ,', ' }J.l'\:':;,:; , '.~~1(;":'-:' . . ~;.~.1 :'. I ~-{ ?!. ,- 'IAt:,- .~ . t.'- ;..;';', Y~:ff " ..~.~ . ~\J .. :. . '. ~:~.~ " , 'l"t', ~':~.:: .. .! ~ : . ii{;/L:"',, ft~. _.' (. ,1.,'1' li.~~{ (", ~;~}'::. ,I'" tj~t:..','," .......~~ ~." ,"'I" . + fir..... ~;~:;",::,:', ':.", ~?;;' .~ ~. \:\, .. E . ";-... ;.i!"', .~ .:'~~' '. >~ ~/::Oi:~..c :~~tJ~} ~ ~: ~ .' ,I ;,J~:.::~',:. .' ", ll, .~t " ,"' ":;.1 . :....\...1 'J"t:,' J~:.~. .... f.,:~~,'~,':'-;: ;'1," ,f~t\. . >.1.. ' . . ~~l'L> i~:\;) . ~ . :~ .' I, " ' :\ . " .. ~$,", . ~... I ~ . - . '~/ '.',r ~ 'e' .. Item # 22 .... 9/(, , ,I ;, ,I I " , " I : ~ ' l i ~ . ;~ ,) ;-, '! , i <8 Cf5 Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum ~ ,..,', ... . . . " , Item II: ,',',,',,": ':' '; J cctlno Oat.: ,~'~t~~~:l " .': '. ", r." ..... "'~ '. .. . '.;.. .... > " ...... . v' 'c . >. SUBJECT: South Ft. Harrison Zoning Study RECOMMEN DA TIO N/MOTIO N: Receive consultant report on zoning and land use compatibility issues in the South Ft. Harrison area and direct staff to Initiate code amendments and capital programming to accommodate the direction and concepts of the report. o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: In approving the FY 1996/96 budget, the Commission directed staff to prepare a zoning analysis for the neighborhood generally bounded by South Ft. Harrison and South Myrtle Avenues south of Downtown Clearwater. This neighborhood was selected due to its rapidly.changing character resulting from the development activity of Morton Plant Hospital and other medical uses, its large range of existing zoning districts (from OL to IL), and its potential as a support area for both the hospital and Downtown Clearwater. Staff retained the Florida Center for Community Design + Research out of USF to prepare the study. The Florida Center has completed its study and wjlJ present its findings to the Commission. The Center staff has the following general recommendations: · Create a more uniform zoning pattern for the study area. · Provide for a wider range of uses within the area, including light manufacturing and residential, to reflect market demands and to promote economic development. . Create broad design controls to promote land use compatibility and insure quality development. . Im,prove interconnections within the neighborhood and between the neighborhood and adjoining areas, including the hospital and the residential areas to the east; take advantage of the Pinellas Trail. Staff requests Commission direction with regard to this matter. We recommend that the concepts of the study be implemented through code amendments and capital improvement programming that staff will develop and bring to the Commission for further consideration. RevIewed by; Legal Budgee Purch..lng RI.k Mgme. IS ACM IJA N/A N/A N/A N/A .f)rlglnatlng Dapartment: u:ntral Permittir:g , .;;~ User Departmant: Costs: Commission Action: o Approved Tatal 0 Approv.d w/Condltlonll o Dllnlad Current Fllcel Veer 0 ContInued to: Advertlled: Funding Source: o Cap/laI ImprovlnMnt: o Opelallng: o Olh.r: Attachments: Other Dete: SubmItted by: Cltv5:.~ o p,lnlld on recvcled pap., Pllp.,: fiQ Not Required Affected Parlles: o Notified IBI Not ReqUired Appropriation Coda r.; None i t i c.? ~ ~ L5 ~I' a: a: jjj >- I ii a: <C e K <( <( a: ::;) t 20') W f5 >-~ I- w ::;) t; i ::> , Z L5 z ::;) ~ 20') f5 ~ ::> L5 W z a: t; a: a: :E C) St- > <C <C< w - Z ~ a: D.. > f5 <( I- Z CJ <C z>- 0 <C z ' 0..... f5 !: -e ...J 0 W ~ i:i :::!:::;) w :J ~ W ~ l- t::! ccn ~ Z ...JI- > ::! D.. 0 :J Wen w en z Q 00) >- 0 >- N t; 8:z CJ >- Cl Cl =:L5 ...J ffi e J:S w ~L5 z en 0.... w a: Gi J: < C) Z W :z: ~a: Q. 0 ~ Uc.. >- ~a: 0 c . . z<C C a: a: z ~!z :3 z<C N C D:tn 0>- W W Z 0 II)w <( 0>- L5 0 ~ 01- ene CC D.. < N CC:s c enc 0 i caO -:J ~ ~ :s W We.. Z -:J a: ;: 0:1- J: Z !;co <( ccl- <( z :cW ~en 0 0 U :3 :E ~en ~ w C!J-:t J:Cl ~ i <( ;:cd J:C,!) w ~ a: -0 .z 0 ~ O:Gi .z $: Cl we:: t:z u ~fa t:z Zo.. .0 0 0 W 0 .0 ~ Z ZN 0 C Z II) ucc (I) CJ)N , , , , , , , , " 'tllI DOl:II , , .' , -v-.s i ?I ~ l~ i it I a '---'QI '011 :lOQ2)o i 0 Ig ~ OJ ~ :s I 'M:I JlI'n i 'Jo\Y~"4 ~"-;- DW1I<<lfl -- i ' 'Jo\y ~ ... '\ 'Jo\YJlM'nl'" ,." 0 I 6 f Q a o O! j oj ~;:: ~, 7G ~ I :t: I j t, l~ p~) " , " .. j , """ ,;."- ,;."- '" o ..., I ~ I I 1 ... ~~J I ~ .. I z 'e'e . , .- " - ..- oOClIo. ..~ , A , ~ I, ~ I . · I ~ ~ \ l . ;-l - <= =- ~ ~ ~ = ~ 00 == =. ~ .~ J. J. = == 'Prepared for: The City of Clearwater Prepared by: The.Florida Center for Community DeSIgn + Research Date: July 1996 ~ J. = ~ ..= ~ = = 00 ~d--- . " .- .. ,.. " -...... - - " .. I"; SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SU.Ml\tAR V ..1...............,..................................................................................".............._................................." J OBSERV A nONS: DJSADV ANrAOES ,........,.................................."...............,..t................................."........,............ 1 QBSERV AnONS: ADVANTAGES .........................................................................,....'.,.~......... ....",...........................1 GENEJtAJ. CONCLUSIONS ..,................................................,.........1'.................................,.,......'...11......................................,...2 Scenario One: Commercial lnfl// and Light lnduslrial...........................................................................2 Scenario Two: Downtown Mixed Use and Industrial Planned DeveJopmenJ.........................................2 Scenario Three: Downtown Mixed Use and Sile Plan incentive District ............... ................................ 3 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMON TO ALL THREE SCENARJOS . n................... .... .............................. .... ...... n. ...4 JNT"R 0 D U crJ ON .....,.,..-..................................,....................................................................................................................... 5 STUDY O.BJ'Ecrl\'ES AND ASSU.MPTIONS ..........._........................._......._..............................."._....................H. 7 METRO DO LOG Y AND FIND ING S .M........................"...................................III.......................................................8 FJELD SUR.'VEYS .......,.............<<I.....,~..II-.... ..,...... ...,.....;-... .." .... .... 'I" lllI-li....... ,..... "'" .........1... ,..... I'" ... ."......... ,..... ,.."... ....... ,.,..... ,...... ... ........... 8 Field Su~ey Findings.....,..............................................................................,................................................9 INTERVIEWS AND DATA COLLECTION......... ...... ,....... ...... ...... .... ......jlI ...... ,........ ,.. ....... .."...................... .f1...:t..",.,.,......#.,,~....~~ 16 lnlervieli's and Data Collection Result.!........... ..........."'......,.".........,....................,.......,..............................16 PUBUC MEEnNGS ..."..... ,......... ,.., .................. ........... ,.. ...... ......11I... ...., ,..,.......,.. .... ... ........ .......... .... ... ... ........ ........ ... ... .... J 7 Zoning Issues ...,......,...,........,.......................,......................................................,............................,............... ............./7 [,and Use Issues ............................................................................................."...........,.......,....................,....,..18 Transportation Issues .... ........ .... ..... .... ... ..... ....... ... ,... ..... ...... ... ".. .... .... ... ,.. ... ,.... ....., ,.. .... ..." .... ~.. ... .... ...,. ..,. ....., ...... J 8 STUDY AREA. AND VlCIN'ITY ISSUES ......................................"...........................................................19 MORTON Pl..AN'r SUMJIrtARy PROFILE.....................................,..........,.......................,.................................................20 CLEAR.W A TEa DoWNTO'W}r.l RE.DEVELOPMENT PLAN .....................,.,....,.."......".........................................,..........,..2) 'ntE PrNE.LLA.S TRAlL ............ ........ .......... ... ..... ,... ..~. ... ,....11I..... ... ... .., .... ....., ... .... ,...... ,.., ..... ,.., ......"" ....... ,.... ......... .., .....22 ConduiJ for DevelopmenJ........ ........ ....fI..... ...,......,..#.....,..4-..~................... ,......,... .~..... ...... ... ...... ... ..... .... ... ...... ...... ..,.. .........23 Localldenllry. .......,.....,.....,............................................................................................................................23 Internal Pedestrian Conneclor ..................................................................................,............-....4t'#...-..4.............~.....;23 Buffer .......+..............................,...................................................."....,.....,.............................................1.......... .............23 Leisure and Recreation.....,.........................,.........................................,....."............................ ....... ..............24 HAMOR O.A.KS ............. ,.. ..11I.. ......... ..... .......... ..... ....... .... ... ........ ...... ......... .... .......... ... ...., ... ... ,... ...,. .". ,.. ,.. .."...... ......... "11I...25 SOt.rn-l W A'RD ELEMENTARY .......................................................................,..............,...................................,..........,...26 Ross NORTON P A"RJr.:.......,.....,.........................,...............................,...................,.............................................................27 ANALYSIS OF TRA.NSPORT A TION .................................._.................._............................................._.........28 VEffiCULAR TRA.FFlC ......11....................".......................................,.........,.........................................,......".......,...............29 PEDESlRJAN 1"R.AFFJc 4'.......~.....~,...~..........., "'... ...., ,...... ."'.......... ....... ,... ". ... ,..., ...... ... ...... .......... ,..... ........... .... .... ... .... ..... ..... ......,....30 TRA,NsroRT AnON PRoPOSAI..S .......................,................................................,............."........."......................,..........,31 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) ANALYSIS ........._..............................................".34 DATA COLLECTION ..............................................................~.............................................,.....,.................,............".,.....,34 DATA ANALYSIS ...........".,........................,.......,.........."............,.................................................................,......................34 LAND USE AND Z~NlNG COMPATIBlLITY ...,............,.........,..,.....,.........................,..,.......,.........".......,.....,...,..............35 DEMOGRAPHICS..., ......,... ~....,.......,... ........ ... ....11I...... ,.......,....... .... ... ... .................... ....... ,....... ... .... ,........... ... ... ...... ..... ... ... ... ... ...3 5 DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS ......._.........._...........................................36 SUMMARY OF DEM-o<lRA.P-InCS . ...... '" .... ....., ........ ,......., ...........,............. .... ..... ..... ..., ,......... ..... ..-:,... ..... ... ... ....... .... ... .............36 PERSONS ...., ,................,."................................,.................. .... ........ ........ ....... ,.. ...... .... .., ...... .... .,.....,...... II' ...., ... ......, ,., ,........ .... ..... ... ,.......36 FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ,.. ;" , ", sourn FORT HARRJSON sruoy REPORT ii INCOME..... I.'" ..4 .... ........ ... ...~. .;,. I,.. .... Ii ..... .~... ... .It.. ".1" ..... ... .... ........ lit.. ... II" .... ....... ,_, '1" 11..t.. ,.... It ,... II" .... ....... ... ... ... '" ..... .,.. ... II .41 HousINo UNITS ....,,,.,....~.,f",.f".."'iI..,.'.........,.,..,................,..........j.....,,,..,.,,,,.,jI....,.....,,,,.............,...,..... ..................................................42 EXISTING ZONING AND L~ USE ISSUES .....................~...........'ltl............."..........t........,...............,1I"........,,,...45 OVERVIEW OF E'X1S'TINO ZONING CONDITIONS "..........................,................................".......................,.."..........45 ANALYSIS OF CURR.E'N1'" ZONrNG AND LAND USE..........,....it."....,....~..."..,....,..............,.....".....................................46 Commercial General (CG) "."...""...."....~.,...."f... ........,."f...."........,.............~.,......." .....,................ ...................~...........+.... .... ... ...46 Neighborhood Commercial District (CN)................................................ ............... ...................... n...... 46 Limited Office Districl (OL). ......,................................ .............................................. ......fI............,.............. 47 Limited lndustrial (IL) ........................,........................,. ...".....,..... .................. ..............4.............,......................47 Master Planned Development (MPD) .....,.......,.......................................,.....,......,......".............................48 Commercial Planned Development (CP D)........... n.. ....... n. ............................ ....... ............... .......... ...... 48 PublJclSeml-Publ/c (PISP).............. ...,...............,...............................................,.....".................................... 48 SUMMAR-V OF. ExISTING ZONING ..,.............."................................,..."...,....,.......................... ........................~.........,.,.....48 ZONING AND LA.ND USE ALTERNATIVES ..................................................."'..............................................53 ZONING PROPQ-SAL #. J ................,.....,...........................................,........'...............................................................~..............,..SJ ZO'NJNO PROPOSAL. #2...................................................................,....,..................,............................................~......................S6 zoNING PROPOSAL. 113 .,...,.............._.............................................................................oIiI.............................,......................59 LAND USE AND DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS .............................._.............62 SUMr.fA.R Y OF Po"J'ENl'lAL lMPROVE"MENTS ,... ...... ... ,...... .... .... .......... ..., ....... ....... ......... ............, ......... ... ....." .... ... ... ...... 62 Proposal Nl..,.. ......."............................,.....,...........1-. ,Jo..............."'. ..... ,........... .... ..... ...... .... .... ... .... ..... .....,. ......,. .... .... ....... .... ..., ....... ....63 Proposal N2..~....................~...........,...........,.....iI-................................................ ...... .,................................................ 6S Proposal il3.....................................,........................... ............................................~.................................................... 67 Proposal ##4............................... .I.................................................,....... ...................+............,.....................................69 Proposal #5...................................... ,......,.........."................. .......................................................................................... 7 J Proposal N6~. ... ..... ..... ... .......~ ................ ..........................,. ....I'.....................~........ ..........,. ...... ... ... Ii.. ....., ... .... ... .... ...... ...... ,.. ..... ..... ,.,... ..... 7 J Proposal #7....,.....,.............,...."...................._....................................... ............. ........................"........................,....75 PRO.JE.CT SUMM.AR.Y A.ND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................_.................................................... 77 APPENDIX I D EM OG"RA.PHI CS..........................................................."......................................"....................."'..... 78 APPENDIX II SV R VEl' QUESTIONNAIRES ......_....................._.................._..............._.............................11II.......82 BtOLI OG MPHY ..............................."................................................................................................................... 90 FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNllY DESIGN + RESEARCH saum FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 1 Executive Summary The South Fort Harrison study area has significant potential for redevelopment if cenain impediments, primarily rigid zoning laws, are loosened and the natural assets it possess are seized upon and successfully marketed. These assets include its proximity to downtown, surrounding neighborhoods, and the coming Pinellas Trail extension. The historic pattern of zoning and land use in Clearwater may have served the city's needs well in the past but now lacks the adaptability needed in the South Fort Harrison area today. The successful rebirth of the South Fort Harrison area hinges on the creation of an identifiable mixed~use, high technology research and development neighborhood that includes flexible zoning, a pedestrian lifestyle, and a variety of housing types. Obsen'atioDS: Disadvantages A legacy of past zoning laws have left the South Fort Harrison area with many small specialized zoning districts, incompatible and un-buffered land use adjacencies, a high percent of vacancy in commercial and industrial rental space, and only the remnants of a formerly vibrant residential neighborhood. A conspicuous lack of local shopping exists along both South the Fort Harrison Ave. and the South Myrtle Ave. corridors. The area has a high percentage of low value uses such as storage areas, junk yards, and parking. Some local land owners complain that some area redevelopment options. primarily medical officet has been discouraged by the presence of Morton Plant Hospital. This, the residents claimt is because Morton Plant is a non-profit institution and therefore may be able to produce office and clinic space at a competitive advantage. Many of these disadvantages are temporary-that is they may diminish if the area successfully redevelops. In addition, the disadvantages that are based on land use and zoning decisions have the potential to be reversed by local government. The problems of non-profit competition with private sector development can still be favorably dealt with by accommodation. Head-on competition with Monon Plant can be avoided by exploiting development options other than office and clinic space. South Fort H8lTison Ave., which is part of the State Road All. 19 route. currently experiences a very high vehicular traffic load which results in heavy congestion at peak travel times. This traffic congestion is primarily caused by the large volumes generated by Morton Plant, downtown, and the high speed north- s(Juth traffic through the area. Traffic congestiont the bane of most mature Tampa Bay communities is unlikely to improve. However, if less automobile dependent development options are pursuedt such as improvement and extension of the local sidewalk system and the completion of the planned PineUas Trail, it is likely that traffic conditions will not significantly worsen. Observations: Advantages The South Fon Harrison area contains one of the largest contiguous Limited Industrial districts in Clearwater. It is under-populated, well located in Pinellas County, and ripe for redevelopment. The neighboring Morton Plant Hospital campus serves as a magnet to attract small medical technology companies and is a significant advantage for the area. South Fort Harrison enjoys a close proximity to Downtown Clearwater and Clearwater Beach. It is surrounded by stable older neighborhoods and does not suffer from a serious crime problem, a common scourge of urban redevelopment. The Limited I"" . ." .J~'"", """", . ." ., ,. l .~, . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARIUSON STUDY REPORT 2 Industrial development in the southern ponion of the study area is so successfully landscaped and buffered that adjacent residential neighborhoods consider it an asset. This is in contrast to the conventional view in zoning that industrial and residential uses should not coincide and illustrates that the successful implementation of buffers, landscaping, and other design improvements can minimize some conflicts between uses. The advent of the Pine lias Trail, which has stimulated positive micro- economic redevelopment in Dunedin and Largo, provides a unique opportunity for South Fort Harrison to develop a high quality of life market-strategy. The combination of available land, proximity to amenities, and pedestrian scale development is matched by few districts in the Tampa Bay region. The district's geographic advantages in proximity are penn anent. Other advantages such as Morton Plant Hospital and the stability of surrounding neighborhoods should remain in the mid to long tenn. The Pinellas Trail is an asset that, along with the right kind of synergistic relationship with Morton Plant Hospital and downtown, should be exploited by the City of Clearwater. General Conclusions The Florida Center has generated three scenarios of increasing intensity. These are described in greater detail later in this document but outlined below: Scenario One: Commercial Infill and Limited Industrial In this least intensive of development scenarios, the zoning of the northern half of the South Fort Harrison study district is consolidated from a mix of Commercial Neighborhood (CN). Office Limited (OL), and Commercial General (CG) zoning to a Commercial InflH (CI) zoning category. This aUows similar types and intensities of development but with greater land use flexibility. This scenario also allows for the possible absorption of uses that may be displaced by Downtown development. A major change is that this planning enlarges the area available for commercial/residential mixed use development, a subject of prime concern of our focus groups. The existing Master Planned Developments (MPD), Commercial Planned Development (CPD), and Public/Semi-Public (P/SP), districts are left unchanged. The Limited Industrial (lL), makes a few minor land area concessions, primarily due to the introduction of a small pedestrian park zoned Open Space/Recreation (OSIR), and some (eI) zoning extended along South Fort Hamson AVe. Scenario Two: Downtown Mixed Use and Industrial Planned Development ]n this strategy the zoning of the northwestern half of the South Fort Harrison study area is converted from 8 mix of conditional zoning districts, Office Limited, Commercial Neighborhood and Commercial General zoning to the Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) category. This pennits g~ter intensity of land use development in order to increase. taxable property value and to create densities more appropriate for a pedestrian urban village environment. Potential for new commerciaVresidential mixed use redevelopment is greatly increased and with higher F.A.R. levels. DMU zoning makes for a good neighbor to the adjacent Downtown redevelopment area. This scenario also allows for the possible absorption of many land uses that may be displaced by Downtown development. A second major planning strategy is the changing of the Limited Industrial zoning district to the establishment of a totally new zoning category, Limited Industrial, Research and Development (ILRD). FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH soum FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 3 This zoning category accommodates the land uses pennitted in both the Limited Industrial (lL) and the Research, Developmentt and Office Park District (RD) zoning classifications. It also permits the continued land use policies specified under the current (lL) zoning while expanding upon the districts capacity to accommodate certain commercial and research and development uses. Expansion and use intensification of the district is made possible due to the flexibility of this proposed zoning scheme. The strategy serves to accommodate the wishes of industrial property owners who want to preserve future redevelopment value of their land as well as create a location for Clearwater to absorb new smaU medical and technological business relocations. The existing Master Planned Developmentst (MPD), Commercial Planned Oevelopmen4(CPD)tand PubliclSemi..publict(P/SP)t districts are left unchanged. A small pedestrian parkt zoned Open Spacel Recreation (OSfR) is proposed along South Fort Harrison Ave. with an landscaped alJeet extended to the Pine 11 as Trail. Scenario Three: Downtown Mixed Use + Site Plan Incentive District (SPIO) In this, the most intense scenario, the northwestern half of the South Fort Harrison study area is fabricated from a mix of conditional zoning districtst Office Limited (OL), Commercial Neighborhood (CN) and Commercial General (CO)t to a Downtown Mixed Use category with a Site Plan Incentive District (SPIn) overlay. The SPID area is bordered by the Downtown Redevelopment to the northt Magnolia to the South, South Fort Hamson to the West and the PineJlas Trail to the East. The purpose of the Site Plan Incentive Disrrict is to encourage property owners to submit mixed use Planned Development projects that offer extra site improvements and urban amenities in exchange for a higher intensity of development. Subject to approval by the City Commission, Site Plans may enjoy cenain land use bonuses or greater latitude in dealing with prescribed land use requirements. The land owner may be pennitted greater development intensity, increased variety of land uset more relaxed parkingt set backt or height requirements. The Connulation of said concept plan is more easily accomplished when the property in question is a consolidated ownership of over 10 acres in area. Among the possiblr. benefits for the City are increased taxable properly valuest a comprehensively planned multifaceted neighborhood which is inherently more resilient to the vagaries of the market place, a stronger community identity for land uses that may be displaced by the anticipated downtown redevelopment. A mixed use community use of shoppingt theaters, restaurantst housing, and possibly a parking garage would create a community center that could be commercial viable close to downtown by providing a place to go. day and nightt for the district populationt surrounding neighborhoodst and visiting tourists. The closest local model for such a development would be a scaled down version of the Old Hyde Park Village development in Tampa. The remaining DMU zoning to the south of the SPID district allows for uses and densities necessary to support complimentary types of development use close to the Downtown redevelopment area. This scenario allows for the possible absorption of uses that may be displaced by Downtown development. The industrial area to the south is changed from Light Industrial to a totally new zoning categoryt Industrial LimitedJResearch and Development (ILIRD), which accommodates the land uses pennitted in both the Limited Industrial (IL) and the Research. Devclopmentt and Office Park District (RD) zoning classifications. In additiont the industrial area is expanded. This allows the continued use of Light Industrial but at higher densities (if properly buffered) as well as allowing certain commerciar and research and development uses. This strategy serves to accommodate the wishes of industrial property FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 4 owners who want to preserve future redevelopment value of their land as well as create a location for Clearwater to absorb new small medical and technological business relocations. The existing Master Planned Developments, (MPD), Commercial Planned Development,{CPD),and PUblic/Semi-public,{P/SP}, districts are left unchanged A small pedestrian park on South Fort Harrison is added and extended to the PineUas Trail. Recommendations Common to All Three Scenarios The Florida.Center recommends that any redevelopment scenario include these additional points: . The City should pursue private sector development rather than public and non-profit expansion in the South Fort Harrison area to expand Clearwater's property tax base. . Future land uses and zoning should be outcome rather than process based; i.e.-they should maintain a variety of land use options and promote mixed use development. . The Pinellas Trail should be exploited as a new means to create a unifying pedestrian link through South Fort Harrison. Whenever possible, redevelopment should attempt to link to the Trail and realize the potential marketing value and as a quality of life asset for both workers and potential residents. The Trail creates opportunities to weave together a diverse mosaic of land uses together without major improvements in automobile infrastructure. . Landscape buffers and urban design guidelines are essential to reducing conflict and adverse impacts by adjacent land uses. These measures can also serve as a means to promote high quality development as well as the creation of an identifiable community character. . Future Site Plan developments should ensure that neighborhood buffers are enhanced and urban amenities created while awarding property owners higher density incentives. . Dead-end streets in the district, long severed because of CSX use, should be connected to improve area circulation, increase public safety, promote interior parcel desirability, and eliminate negative aspects such as trash accumulation and public safety hazards. When this is not possible, dead-ends should be redeveloped into landscaped cul~de-sacs with trees, benches, and housing. . Pedestrian uses should be promoted by the development of a network of contiguous sidewalks, increased shade tree plantings, increased street lighting, and the development of interconnections to the PineIlas Trail. All sidewalks should be upgraded to meet ADA requirements. . Redevelopment should be coordinated as much as is possible with Morton Plant Hospital. Land owners clo'se to Manon Plant may need greater flexibility to respond to further medical office and clinic development. . Surrounding neighborhoods such as Harbor Oaks and Belleair offer stable, attractive, and conveniently located housing for new workers that a revitalized South Fort Harrison will attract. There is a synergistic and symbiotic relationship between the district and the surrounding neighborhoods. The long term health of each is dependent upon the other. Therefore any redevelopment should provide adequate buffers, landscaping, compatible uses, and pedestrian interconnections to allow both areas to thrive. . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 5 , Introduction Clearwater is n mature sunbelt city. Most of its available land is already developed. The City1s future, thereforet lies in it's ability to wisely redevelop those areas that can add to the local economy while retaining and enhancing community livability. This is the chal1enge that the citizens and leaders of Clearwater face in the redevelopment of the South Fort Harrison area. Such redevelopment reduces sprawl, environmental impact, and utilizes existing roads, sewers, and other public infrastructure. Such goals are encouraged by regional. state, and federal policies. Wise redevelopment of the South Fort Harrison area will not only support those policies but will also promote higher propeny values, new employment opportunities for local citizens. and increases to the City's economic base. In order to ensure an unbiased professional assessment of the redevelopment potential of this area the City of Clearwater obtained the services of the Florida Center for Community Design and Research at a cost of $18.000. The Florida Center is a research-oriented public service non-profit based at the University of South Florida. The following report contains th'e coUective findings of their investigations. ....iw.-U--- \ I trl " l "1 '\. -- ...,." 1__ I, I ~..._, .~ " I I. ,~.f,~ I 'J ~ tit"}.,!......, ,.. ~ ..~...IJ""'S:t I ... / ~:-t.:.~.:..~~.:;7) #- J ~J ~":i:~~~:~~.. r ,- - - .. -I itt:'.;~....tr-;:p I · I ~.~. I. _ '":;~;H..f~.;. i' 'I kl' - 1, ~:~J:.~\ ~ J-,..r -' ':~-f~:.:.' r- ....- l I --- l1.,~...~...: ~ J " - .f..5~"":"....~ - ..f' ~ \.,...~ tJ ~-;. -I .s-1-;-:::~;.'!';!~.;;..~.. ~~ ..1--~..J......f "'1.,...- ... t-.....~::..,...........-....~.ot-: ~-. u)l j J~I . ...~ttQ- , .L, .__"t- .,.....J . . , ~':7-...J \oJ",,:, t1~~~-~.::~.;.~(~ . f S -. t.J. 1':. /..... ~..........~- . , c. CW""""Y ,'.- '. r .~t~" r..., Lj _-' '; I.. L': -J-"::'" ..~;''1'=~r.~7.~. _~~;~ . . l1.'.!J L.r.:;;;J"l.to' \ J 'E' - 1 '11'.~., '~l.;:.'I!'i':~(':;';" -.. f''' .., \~,.1 r "\. I _. \~, . I ,:.,./.'1" .'::~oo:!'.1;"."~. "",,"1. ;,...'t. '... ,'" I L.. ...~.::::/ r.. C:.J "" ft.: ..'"t..:m:':::-""'.~~":'-'.""""r': :..... -' I ,,:"t ?:., 1 ~;t!I. u ~1o'L, - -~,r;7:;-".;u,::;-~.;.r-..i.'~.. - .:'" .. ~Jt' '''';!t~ r<;;;j~ t:~-- f" r.~""M_IJ'~-~~;d..h N.l,.....~; . :-. - .:.":' . \J" L. rC~I~ ...I . ,~ f" J~~~$:!:-::rr~'''':)~ ..:" . '\I~ \l .. ~ ~(~~i;:l.fi~,.~. " ~. '. "\t . U .' "'';;::,i'; i .j.~".;("..r...l;"~~ .0 11 .' sr ~-:..~ . .~...~l~ .~~-:r-'!'.~, ~ r. f1 ~ u . ~ -~ ~"1.P:;J'::-'51<~~:~~"':~ . ....l.. "'t~~~ ...,..... ;..'It,..~~J:c.>;".... ;$::': , ....-.-~ r ,I n...-....~.,.. - ....";:!o"-<'i:'--..~.'..;. ..,,><....... I ~ !-- 11:..... 'I,;. ~Jl.;~wr. ~" .;.~~I':.~ ~~....::. '::.:!:"~~J;~:~ ..01 ~"'J'L~~"P:...I - ~~~JN:7,'!~'!';~1:'!...<f..':::;t~::.", tJ. r'" I -1:1 'j,dt::,.." .". .. -,' h - -..... "'h'~.: . ~ - . ~ - ~. '--Y:'7.~.IJr.;' Lc,gt:nd >':" r. t.-r,1~' --L".!'JihJ:tl-'l -I~~:~;'~'j\: ~j~: --.. ~.-\-= . ... . .:--;'''''''''~'''''' - _ aa./J",",.. ..'; I ...~ ... .. ~~./.....~ _ _ .., ,-....,. .\ It~ -- .....:;~~.. - - - ~!. J \. .~ '- _:. -' C'.,IlI'~.. fw; oJl " .r-'~_. .......... ~ . ~_. -.. . < _'.. ..~~t:~ , . I - ~."i....~_.,:.,-.~<:-:;::7.. , .. . . _~ ....::i~~~:#~.. ~:':...~:7:..r~..".~" . . . Figure 1. Study Area Location FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 6 .. ......, .. . 1:-.:....: .. ._4 .:;1--"..,.:.... cr~_/t..~ ,-..;;- ~::-Ir -'1 ~- --:; ::::". J ~ t -.. - ... . "1 ~- ~7; ." 1.- ... -- -- !...- .-:--. -....: :---'-..,.-. -["'1' I' ......--. --. -; .": :..J:..:....-:.:..:..:.:~...:...:..: .;:n>- I ..... - -,..,..-, ;~.. ... -....--".-..-- 'u_... ~ II ...::::..::-- J' ".-i -.;. ~....=;.-. ,-....;:..:oIl: Il_....-: =: i . c. 'p:' ..,.. -(,. __ . . ~ ....11I .....'.. --..- - -::1. ~~ ..... _...--.....~- - . .......~ .'"'1""-, - "..'- 1 :.="""':::"' ~-"'J"'"""" ;,...--. ,. ".h~"~ -'r.. ~t.. __.... A ( "1 ' ~- _.,. '. " I '..uPlj III I,. of .,.... I II.", ~ ".--a.. I' ,.. I!"O,..r.-) I" .', I -..: ;., ..... ~~ J f ...................l~~; :..::T~*'" :-l>....-~B~.~~.. '"\. I"';' I. It. , '. : .:J-- ,..: '~ljt ~ .t~i ,/-__ I"~~."d . . ..~:-,~ ".. ~.' ,.._;.-.:.i'r;ti::7H~r:.;":' . ....... "_-,,,.. I i,q~ .."h......l~. .:t... =.... ,. .. ..... .. '. ~.._.~..:;, 1 E..:"'; t ~'.T.<....~ "~... "'::-..T~~~ -.-......-:111.,,,..:. ~. 'm' '~':;;'1.1 ... . ::- :: ... .. .I ! I .......a...t. .~ > r-.... ....--.......- -- ._~., . 11I....f I I' ......\:!.....-... .--. : t...:.J~......L. T 11. .:ll~ ." - -..... .. I. . III' . . .., r-;. I c .~. .~!.l;.. ~... ...,.. . .~:- .........., ~........ '....,-. -~ ~....... .....,; ."1 I' /'( .., . .. 1IF.U.r.AIK qv, Figure 2, Map of South Fort Harrison Study Area. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTI-I FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 7 Study Objectives and Assumptions A primary goal of this study was to objectively determine the range of options that the City of Clearwater should take in the redevelopment of the South Fort Harrison area. The research team operated under the following assumptions: ' . 'Redevelopment should be in the best long and mid-term community and economic interests of the . property owners, surrounding neighborhoods, and the City of Clearwater as a whole. . Economic activities that erihanced surrounding uses and minimized adverse impacts were preferable choices because they were sustainable to the community over the long term. . Because a large percentage of land near downtown is already. owned by governments, non-profits, and religious institutions any new redevelopment should increase the City of Clearwater's taxable land value. . South Fon Harrison 'redevelopment needs to be complementary to redevelopment of Downtown Clearwater, the Beach area, and the rest of the City. . The present and future needs of all stakeholders, in particular current residents, property owners, . ,Monon Plant Hospital and the surrounding neighborhoods such as Harbor Oaks, needs to be addressed. ! ~ '. , ,. . .... . 1 1;' '.. ..~ < '" , . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH < ...' <.. oj > '" 1 !' . j . ~ ( . sourn FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 8 Methodology and Findings A number of analysis and data collection methods were used in this study. These methods included: . Field Surveys . Interviews . Public Meetings . GIS Analysis . Case Study Research · Demographics (U.S. Census) . Parcel Data (City, County and field survey sources) The following discussion briefly summarizes the reasons why the aforementioned methods were used, how these were implemented and what results were obtained by using these methods. Field Surveys The Florida Center employed field survey teams to study and assess the existing conditions of the South Fort Harrison study area. Several field surveys were conducted during the course of investigation. The purpose of the field surveys were to document and assess existing land use, street conditions, housing and building conditions, traffic conditions, green space, and physical infrastructure. The survey process . was conducted by teams of2 to 3 researchers who walked the study area and the immediate vicinity. The teams recorded, mapped, and photographed site conditions relevant to the purpose of this study. Important survey objectives were as follows: . Observation and recording of the existing land uses and the compilation or an accurate land use map . Identification of building ownership and/or occupant when possible . Analysis of compatibility issues concerning adjacent properties . Study the efficiency of current land use and the identification ofunderutilized or neglected properties . Identification and location of vacant land parcels . Identification of vacant and dilapidated buildings . Locate nuisance occurrences (open drainage ditches, vegetation overgrowth, litter and refuse accumulation, etc.) . Observe vehicular and pedestrian infrastructure quality and use . Investigate compatibility concerns at vehicular and pedestrian interfaces . Locate proposed routing of the Pinellas Trail and investigate its potential impact on the study area . Study the stteetscaping, landscaping, and property buffering circumstances of the study area . ,Explore architectural issues (general aesthetics, identification of local vernacular, appurtenance of style and fonn, continuity of community image, issues of adaptive reuse and renovation, historical restoration, etc.) . Become familiar with the immediate vicinity and identify entities and/or relationships that demonstrate the propensity to significantly impact or be impacted by the activities occuning within the South Fort Harrison study area FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ~;;A"~';~-(;t."';>~."../'"..)(.J-':':'''''''{ 11>.... '" ,. u SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 9 Field Survey Findings The following is a list of our survey findings in the South Harrison area. · There are a number of instances where the land use does not conform or is conditional to what is permitted by the designated zoning districts of the study area. · There exist large tracts of vacant undeveloped land scattered throughout the South Fort Harrison study district. · Large stretches ofunderutiJized or vacant property along South Fort Harrison Ave. · Many of the vacant buildings, undeveloped or underutilized properties are poorly maintained, inadequately buffered and create an unattractive image for the community. The auto salvage yard on Pine 51. is one oftbe more conspicuous examples of this neglect. · Residual residential activity is limited to a few isolated parcels in the region. · A number of residential structures were observed to be in relatively poor physical condition. · Some residential structures have been renovated and adapted to professional office or commercial use. · Continuity of architectural style and fonn is non-extant in the buildings in the South Fort Harrison area. This detracts from any sense of community in the study area. · There is little evidence of any acknowledgment of the local vernacular architecture. An abundance of good examples are available in Downtown Clearwater and the Harbor Oaks community. · A streetscaping scheme is indiscernible along both South Fort Harrison Ave. and South Myrtle Ave. A few positive isolated occurrences were found, such as the Morton Plant Hospital frontage on South Fort Hanison Ave. and along the Magnolia Manor property on South Myrtle Ave. · The Scony's acreage on South Myrtle Ave. is a particularly bad example of how the total absence of streetscaping, landscaping, and buffering can severely damage a neighborhood's appearance. · Dead-end street conditions at "An St., Magnolia Dr., Jasmine Way, and Pine St. are problematic in that they hinder traffic flow and accessibility to large tracts of undeveloped land. Moreover, they are poorly maintained and exhibit unsightly nuisances that are a detriment to the neighboring development. · A significant amount of high speed traffic volume and congestion was observed on South Fort Harrison Ave.. · Sidewalks are discontinuous along many of the east-west cross streets between South Fort Harrison Ave., Prospect Ave., and along the extreme northern and southern stretches of South Myrtle Ave. These conditions can interfere with pedestrian access to,. and mobiJiry within, the South Fort Harrison community. · The cemetery at the intersection of Lake view Rd. and South Myrtle Ave. was in desperate need of a landscape buffer, streetscaping and sidewalks along South Myrtle. · . A large open drainage ditch runs alongside a significant portion of the proposed Pinellas Trail route, from Lakevjew Rd. to Magnolia Dr. It was observed to produce stagnant pools, overgrown vegetation, and an accumulation of litter alongside certain segments. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 10 Figure 3. Poorly maintained mixed-use opportunity Figure 4. Successful conversion from residential to retail use FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH sourn FORT HARmSON STUDY REPORT Figure 5. Inhospitable streetscape along South Fort Harrison Ave. .. i ~ '. .. ~, . ... ..~.' Figure 6. Pedestrian friendly streetscape on Cleveland St. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH 11 SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 12 Figure 7. Poorly maintained auto salvage lot along propsed on Pine St. I I.. . Figure 8. Positive impact of Pine lias Trail in Dunedin FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH - sourn FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 13 Figure 9. Absence of sidewalk on South Myrtle Ave.and Turner St. Figure 10. Pedestrian friendly retail frontage on South Fort Harrison Ave. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 14 Figure 11. Underutilized retaj] opportUnity on South Fort Harrison Ave. Figure 12. Active retail edge along Cleveland 51. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNIIT DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRlSON STUDY REPORT 15 Figure 13. Absence of sidewalk and streetscaping on South Myrtle Ave. ;:~{~~~.. I J.'I Figure 14. Inviting street edge at Chestnut Street and South Fort Harrison Ave. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTII FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 16 JDterviews and Data Collection The Frorida Center conducted numerous interviews with Jocal business and communit)' leaders, representatives of local agencies, and business or property owners within the study area. The purpose of the interviews was to familiarize the interviewees with the mission and scope of the South Fon Harrison Study, ascertain opinions regarding current zoning, land use and physical conditions in the study area, obtain recommendations for improvement and how these recommendations might be implemented, and to obtain predictions and/or preferences for what might transpire pertaining to the community in the coming years. The interviews were conducted in person, from a prepared list of questions, and at a site and time selected at the convenience the interviewee. Initially the City of Clearwater furnished the Florida Center with a list of eight candidates recommended as subjects for interview. A large percentage of the subsequent interviews obtained by the Florida Center staff were through referrals or recommendations from these initial interviews. In total, 34 interviews were conducted . In addition to conducting personal interviews, Florida Center researchers gathered pertinent infonnation from the City of Clearwater, Clearwater Chamber of Commerce, PineUas County Government, the Florida Department of Transportation as well as infonnation provided by the private sector (Tampa Bay Partnership, Morton Plant Hospital, local engineering and architectural finns, real-estate brokerages, etc.). InterVi""s and Data Collection Results The following bullets summarizes infonnation gathered through the interview and data collection phase of our research for the South Fort Hanison Study. . The study area is subdivided into an overabundance of small and restrictive or limited zoning districts. These districts encumber property owners in their attempts to meet the changing market demands of the area. . Much of the zoning in the study area does not adequately address current or projected market demands. . A need exists for the creation of larger more comprehensive zoning districts that allow for more light manufacturing, medical laboratories and clinics, and research and development. . There is a need for the creation of mixed use development in which encompasses commercial, office, and residential growth. . There is a general need to revitalize residential development. . There is a general need to intensify density ofland use (increased F.A.R.). . The South Fort Harrison area should be zoned to accommodate businesses displaced during the implementation of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. . . The cost of impact fees prohibitive and seen as an impediment to new development, existing operations expansions, and the adaptive renovation of existing buildings to accommodate demands of the changing economic marketplace. . Strategies are needed to relieve the traffic congestion along South Fort Harrison Ave. which has a level of service (LOS) rating of "C". Funher widening is not possible. The rerouting of All. 19 off of South Fort Hanison is one potential solution. . South Myrtle Ave. is viewed by some as becoming a major commercial corridor. . The planned Chestnut St. approach to the new Memorial Causeway Bridge may significantly increase the levels of tourist and local traffic along the northern edge of the study area The viability FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH 'I SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 17 of new commercial investment in this area is further increased with the Chestnut St. conversion from a 4-lane one way street to a 4-lane two way street. · The large Morton Plant Hospital parking lot (located between Jeffords St. and Magnolia Dr. and along the CSX tracks) was considered by law enforcement officials as a potential site of increased criminal activity. This includes auto theft, auto burglary, assaults etc. This is primarily due to its relative isolation, low visibility, and lack of through traffic on Magnolia Dr. (dead-ends into thc CSX tracks). · The extension of the Pinellas Trail through the study area would benefit the community by facilitating pedestrian access to the region, thus increasing local and tourist pedestrian traffic through the core of the district. This new source of pedestrian activity may encourage additional commercial development opportunities for the South Fort Harrison area. Public Meetings Two public meetings were held during the preliminary stages of the study. The purpose of the meetings was to: · Familiarize the citizens with the purpose of the study · Obtain feedback from the citizens regarding issues of concern · Use the infonnation provided by the citizens when fonnulating proposals The first meeting. held at the Commission Chambers of the CJearwater City HaJJ on Friday, March 29, 7;00 P.M., had 17 people in attendance. The second similarly held meeting occurred on Thursday. April 11, hud nine people attending. Illustrated boards were presented to the attendees at both meetings. One board outlined and identified the existing zoning districts within the study area. Another board illustrated the current land use in the study area based on Florida Center surveys. A. third board diagrammed the transportation conditions of the study area. Additionally the Florida Center provided each person in attendance with a questionnaire and map of the study area which depicted the current zoning. land use and property ownership (Appendix I). The information gathered from the participants at the meetings was utjJjzed as part of the formulation of Florida Center proposals. Unfortunately, the response to the questionnaires was disappointingly low. Only four of the questionnaires were completed and returned. Despite small turnouts, the level of interest and discussion during the meetings was high. Recorded comments from these meetings are as follows: Zoning Issues . Office Limited, (OL) zoning in the study area does not permit indoor retail. In addition, the market for office space has topped off, Jeaving property owners in OL zoning with vacant unmarketable buildings. The shift to a commercial zoning from OL will reduce the number of vacancies in the existing office buildings. . Commercial Neighborhood seems to be a much more pragmatic buffer between Industrial Limited (IL) and residential land use than OL zoning. . Some residents believed that IL zoning is not appropriate for the South Fort Hanison area and that light industrial should be' located out on Hercules Ave. where there already exists extensive industrial development. . It was suggested that IL zoning be changed to a commercial zoning. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 18 · It was suggested to redefine IL to accommodate high tech. research and development, and commercial uses which would reduce vehicular traffic and land use nuisances. . The Commercial General zoning on South Fort Harrison across from South Ward Elementary does not seem to be compatible. Residents would rather see the area converted to residential which would provide economic and social benefits to the community. Land Use Issues · The study area is being encroached upon by Morton Plant Hospital and the City Government. Light industry is being siphoned by the outlying County. . Residents in attendance felt that the study area needed to stand on its own and not be dependent on the planned downto\W1 redevelopment. . The elevated office vacancy rates are due to unreasonably high impact fees. · Concern was expressed that Morton Plant Hospital, a non-profit entity which does not have to pay property taxes, is continuing to expand through "piecemeal land grabbing." This activity is taking more land off the tax rolls. . The private sector will not be able to offer competitive office rental rates if Monon Plant Hospital proceeds with its planned medical office building construction. . Many sections of the community are visually repulsive. There is a compelling need for effective buffering of unsightly land uses. · Concern was expressed over the deteriorating conditions of vacant properties and the increased criminal activity which they may attract. · The IL properties along "En 81., the southern border of the study area, was cited by neighboring residents as a good example of how industrial operations can make excellent neighbors through conscientious landscaping and strectscaping. Transportation Issues . Traffic congestion and noise on South Fort Harrison was considered bad. . Many traffic accidents occur at intersections along South Fort Hmison Ave. . South Fort Harrison too narrow to handle traffic loads and cannot be widened. . Suggestions were made to reroute All. 19 either to South Myrtle or Missouri in order to divert the north/south through traffic. . The one-way pairing of South Fort Hanison and South Myrtle was considered with favor as a possible solution to the traffic flow problems. . Local public transit was perceived as being adequate. . Trucking activity at the wholesale fruit and vegetable market on South Fort Harrison Ave. and Turner St. was viewed by some as being an eyesore and an impediment to traffic flow. . There were conflicting views on the value and impact of the Pinellas Trail extension into in the South Fort Harrison Study Area. Some of those in attendance felt that very few people would use the "Trailn because its planned routing goes through unattractive IL zoned areas. This point was disputed by others in attendance who thought the trail would be very beneficial to the area. . The method in which the &'Trail't would cross Druid Rd. was questioned. The City had perfonned studies on this matter and discovered that bridging Druid Rd. was not an option because it was much too expensive. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH I. i SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT Study Area and 'Vicinity Issues . Monon Plant · Downtown Redevelopment . PincHas Trail · Harbor Oaks · South Ward Elemental)' · Ross Norton Park 'I MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL &MPD~ ~ ~ DO nnlll \ Figure 15. Study area and vicinity FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ 19 SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 20 Morton Plant Summary Profile Figure 16. Morton Plant Hospital . Major employer in area (est. 3,500 jobs on main campus) · Extensive land holdings in the study area (38 acres) power plant and parking lots (see map) . Morton Plant has agreed to enhance butTering and landscaping along South Fort Harrison. They will provide a 25' landscape strip along the west side of South Fort Harrison and a 10' strip along the east side by the end of 1996. · A large amount of planned growth to occur, of particular significance is a planned 100,000 sq. ft. doctor's office building which may, upon its completion, significantly impact the market fer such land use in the South Fort Harrison study area . · Morton Plant is viewed as a major catalyst or attraction for the location of medical cHnies, laboratories, and related research and development and manufacturing in the South Fort Harrison study area. Existing Proposed Zoning Lot Area (Gross Sq.Acres) Lot Area (Net Sq. Acres) Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft) F.A.R. Paved Vehicular (Sq.Ft) Parking Spaces Employoes MPD 38.7 37.4 838,831 0.497 56.8 2,464 3500. MPD 44.2 42.7 1.302,162 0.676 65.5 3,436 *Approxtmate number on main campus - Table I. Morton PJant summary profile FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNIlY DESIGN + RESEARCH !. SOUTII FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Pion Figure 16. Downtown redevelopment along Cleveland 51. . Park Lake Project . Memorial Parkway . Residentiallnfill and Neighborhoods . County Complex . Myrtle Street Downtown Connector . Court and Chestnut Streets become two--way FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH 21 SOUTH FORT HARRISON SruDY REPORT 22 The P'nellas Trail Figure 17. Pinellas Trail route through South Fort Harrison Area . . Length: 1.54 Miles (trail & sidewalk) . StSrts at Belleview Street . Ends at J ones Street . Focal Point for Corridor . Internal Pedestrian Connector . Leisure Recreation . Conduit for Development . . Buff,:r . Greenway Benefits FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ,. "~.rl."~f/~: "\.lY'': !)'t~\,j. ~.w,........",.......I""~'''' '. .. ~ . . , ,., 4 . SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 23 The as-planned completion of the PineJJas Trail runs through the South Fort Harrison area is a criticaJJy important and under-appreciated asset for local redevelopment. The 1.54 mile length of this stretch of the trail enters the district at Belleview Street and exits at Jones Street. The trail confers several redevelopment advantages to the immediate area: Conduit for Development In the last 10 years there has been a growing trend for virgin land development in sun belt states such as North and South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Colorado, and California to be based around Greenway and Trail corridors. A primary reason is that a long linear trail spreads its amenity benefit along a maximum number of properties and far more efficiently than 8 large park. Secondly, developments marketed toward upper middle class markets have found that potential home buyers and employers are willing to pay a premium for lots along a well maintained trail. Finally the type of development must be compatible with the adjoining trail. This includes pedestrian and bicycle connections to nr.arby buildings, thoughtful site improvements such as additional lighting and landscaping, and orienting building fronts and open spaces toward the trail. This' is particularly true of developments catering to younger technology and R&D workers. This strategy should still work in redeveloping an urban area such as South Fort Harrison. Local Identity The Pinellas Trail can serve as a focal point for the South Fort Hanison Area. By marketing the area as a distinct and unique area (Le. Ittechnology trail") in Pinellas County smaller scale office and more pedestrian oriented developments (similar to OJd Hyde Park ViJlage in Tampa) can be attracted to relocate. A trail.oriented development district provides greater diversity to the type of areas available for families and enterprises to relocate to in the City of Clearwater as weB as recapture relocations leaving the City for more bucolic areas of North Pine lias, Hillsborough, and Pasco counties. Internal Pedestrian Connector The Pinellas Trail can serve as an internal pedestrian and non.motorized transportation conidor in a part of the City facing traffic congestion. If nearby residential areas, schools, day care, restaurants, and employers are tied into the corridor with a district wide web of pathways it will encourage greater non automobile modal trips. Furthermore, the resulting interconnection may result in some individuals who work in the district relocating their homes to either in or nearby South Fort Hanison. This will result in greater revenue capture for the City of Clearwater. j. Buffer A landscaped and improved Pinellas Trail can serve as an effective buffer between different and potentially non-compatible land uses. This is important for attracting residential investment in the district in those areas closely Jocated to industrial and large office uses. In addition, property along the trail should see a decrease in crime as the high number of passers by discourage criminal activity. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ',~' '~;,'-, l .,' SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 24 Leisure and Recreation New leisure and recreational activities that the Trail will pull in will increase the attractiveness of the South Fan Hanison area to younger professionals, singles, and early retirees possibly resulting in further residential relocation. As much of this activity may take place on evenings and weekends any economic impact will be in addition to that created by office and commercial redevelopment. Grecnways benefit redevelopment along the trail through more efficient land use, less car trips, less impervious surface, and less urban sprawl on the Tampa Bay regional development edge. These benefits are in keeping with the intent of the State Comprehensive Plan and environmental policies as well as havmg real and quantifiable environmental benefit to the people, flora, and fauna of Clearwater. () .'I'C ,. . .'" ,. ., , . , ~, ,: t ~ , . ) ~I' :. C<.\. , ~ i . I' '. ,. ". . " " . , :. ~\ . '. ' ~ . 1(:""" . . :i'i/ ,;:, :.' ! '.~:.;..: .~. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNI1Y DESIGN + RESEARCH ; > ~ .... .' .:;:, . ~~:):" ,;; I. lio\lr~~Wr.w:4.'-.""~.""""'--- . ...T...'..."......fII .."~."'j,~L."'".........., ........... .... ..< ~..... , .~- L,.."'.t...._.........., .H ...~...~~. ..........>..H~... J , '.. ...<. '~ . ~ SOunt FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 25 Harbor Oaks Figure 18. Harbor Oaks · National Historic Register · Stable Property Value · High-End Residential · Stable Population FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNllY DESIGN + RESEARCH '~:'.:~'''''''~''~~'I~p... ~M;l ~'.: . . ~~~1-~~.c1~ t.~~:!;l,.~~ 1::~:~~ ?1~/~~~!i) ::. ',,/;' "".:,."., ....;~, " ~~~;(~;~;~,;);:,:;:;iY;':\;"t'\::~"','. ;',.'.. ~ . ,. .; .' ' . '.~ " T _ . ... '.. , . . . , ~. II.: . ,.,.....C ...: . . . .>;<~. .' . j :~.'1>: .,;.. ::'>,'''; . : ,: . . , }:A. f < I ; ~ : ./ .' .. ~ . }c .' .: .: ~': I c'.' . i < , c . I :. SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 26 South Ward Elementary '. Figure 19. South Ward Elementary School . Enrollment K.5 ." Increasing Enrollment (1985: 265...1996: 308) . Enrollment Capacity = 350 pupils . Monon Plant Contract (K-2) I. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH I I ' I~"""'"";"":~';''''''''-'''' ,"" . SOUTH FORT HARRISON SnIDV REPORT Ross NOMon Park Figure 20. Ross Norton Parlt . Community Center . Olympic Pool . Lake Bellevue . Sports Facilities . Police Subsultion " . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH 27 . SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 28 1. Analysis of Transportation Existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation conditions in the South Fon Harrison study area were examined using information gathered from street surveys~ public opinion polls, public transportation maps~ and Level afService data. Specifically, the analysis included: · Identification of streets and street conditions · Traffic counts (photographs) . Mass transit evaluation · Public opinion survey of service quality · Examination of Level of Service data A number of transportation infrastructure elements were surveyed including the locations of dead.end streets, traffic lights, and rail and recreational corridors. In 8dditjon~ the directional flow and lane designation of vehicular traffic was recorded and summarized (Figure 21). II' .. .. - Figure 21. Existing Transponation Map for the South Fort Harrison Area FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH I i: SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 29 Vehicular Traffic GenerallYt traffic conditions in the South Fort Harrison study area need improvement. Public opinion of vehicular conditions (noted at the public meetings) suggested that vehicular traffic in the study area was generally bettcr in the southern ponion of the study area and was poorer in the northern half of the study area. One notable complaint was of poor access from Harbor Oaks onto South Fort Harrison Avenue. Moreovert Morton Plant Hospital generates a substantial number of vehicular trips. A number of dead- end conditions on east-west streets prohibit the mitigation of the highly congested north-south South Fort Harrison Avenue corridor. Level of Service (LOS) data was obtained from the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). This data summarizes average daily traffic (ADT) counts for sclected road segments in Pinellas County and ranks the counts alphabetically from A through F (A = free-flowing segments, F :: very serious traffic congestion). Table 2. summarizes the LOS segments that fall within the study area. In general, the most serious congestion problems are locBted just outside the northern study area boundary. The segments that fall within the study area are almost entirely C and E. Notably, South Fort Harrison Avenue (LOS '.Cn) is the only north..south corridor that runs the entire length of the study area and for which LOS data was available. Street From To Lanes Speed Limit LOS S. Ft. Harrison Court St. CheSblut St. 4 3S F S. Ft. Harrison Chestnut St. Druid Rd. 4 4S C S. Ft. Harrison Druid Rd Lakeview Rd. 4 4S C S. Ft. Harrison Lakeview Rd. BeJleview Blvd. 4 4S C Chestnut St. Myrtle Ave. Ft. Harrison 4 4S E Chestnut St. Court St. Myrtle Ave. 3 3S E Chestnut St. Greenwood Ave. Court St. 4 4S E Court St. Chestnut St.. Myrtle Ave. 4 4S E Court St. Myrtle Ave. S. Ft. Harrison 4 4S E Druid Rd N. Greenwood Myrtle Ave. 2 4S D Druid Rd Myrtle Ave. S. Fort Harrison 2 4S C Lakeview Rd N. Greenwood Myrtle Ave. 2 30 C Lakeview Rd Myrtle Ave. S. Ft. Harrison 2 30 C Table 2. Level of Service Data for Street Segments in South Fort Harrison Study Area (Source: Pinellas County MPO, 1996) FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH !11i~;';"'1-'l.-'1I"" '" "{.. . . '.. F1..::lt11"t_t(f.'Jl/.lc'(~". ,I ~..:: ,.., .; c. -\' " .i!:'. """""1~ "$~'(~" ~ I,lc'\ /'" (~ ',le " . ) ,,<,~~;~r~f; "'1~1~;:,.:~~~{~5E'~~~;~':f; :1.... ',;: .'. .,' ." '. ,~~~: "I) '~{,""l\\:'.{I!WJ~...1,,_~'.'*Jf~~c.J' 3q".l. ,'.,;~" . t > .;~~'-\-.t:.. ~f~\~Y'ii/~..;;:~..'~;:'}~~(.<\' .:';. .i.:.>'~1:1 .:< '. >. '. 1~,'~' . . r j,i1. r'/~I.:. o,....:.-,!p..1"/,'..;l\. .ll. ;...,<~~':,,\! ,.' '"' .".. . .' >, : t . ; .\ ~ , ..;:~., I . : .. . '< :' \. I' .~ }." -..; I:. .' . \ . ~ '. . . I " :.' ~ . l I ~ .' . " . . . ~.."t~"'''';''''\l~(~~''"" . 'c:~V\.~r'1:~t>t.. i. ...f....~<,~.'Ii;;~~~t_~ - '.. . I.,' ~ ,'.... ". ~~ :.."'-'04.,.........,.... ..._, .....- >~......?~:~~', .~.. ."' ,.:~..~ , r.'\~... ,".::;': '... f. c. .. .... 'I iH ".' soum FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 30 .... E , .......-. . " .--. o .' 1___'.: 1....,11 ~ . I : i __~Il. , .._,._ :I Do J .! .- _."1- I ..1 --. ,---.--i .. iii c -Wet , t... , ,. =~ I .....-.. J · -I" ~ ..... __Or _II .. .I I o..tcI Coral. "'- S\. _ . Lnd ol5crYlcr. 10_....._....,_ -elft -J),'~ _"I _'11 T_'51 ........-..... ~... . _ c.. "'* . . o . . o , , """'...-.__.--~ ISl ~~.' II ~t. ., -'- ...._-.ol Figure 22. Level of Service In South Fort Harrison Study Area Pedestrian Trame A sidewalk survey was conducted to assess the status of pedestrian accessibility in the study area. A number of issues were examined including the presence or absence of sidewalkst physical condition of sidewalks, and street/sidewalk interfaces. Additionally, compliance or non-compliance with American with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards were documented with photographs, Generally, the survey results indicated inconsistencies in sidewalk conditions. This included a number of examples of discontiguous sidewalks along east-west streets. Public opinion of sidewalk conditions were consistent with survey results. SpecificalfYt 8 northern stretch of South Myrtle Avenue near Scotty's did not have a sidewalk. This condition was repeated along the southern part of South Myrtle AvenUfl approaching Lakeview Road near the cemetery. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH I, . SOUTIl FORT HARRISON S11JDY REPORT 31 The proposed Pinellas Trail flows through the study area and is n potential link to improved pedestrian conditions on east~west streets. The trail is seen as a focal point of the study area and an internal pedestrian corridor. If mixed use 'redevelopment occurs in sections ofthe study areat improved pedestrian accessibility win encourage non-automobile modal trips. Improved sidewalk conditions combined with . the PineUas Trail extension may result in some persons relocating in or near the South Fort Harrison area. In summaJYt the existing transportation conditions in the: South Fort Harrison study area exhibited the foJ lowing characteristics: . High congestion on South Fort Harrison during peak hours . Poor access from Harbor Oaks onto South Fort Harrison . Numerous dead end conditions on east-west streets . Morton Plant Hospital significant trip generator . Inconsistent sidewalk conditions . Limited sidewalk availability on cast-west streets . Pinellas Trail offering potential pedestrian links Transportation Proposals Currently, the South Fort Hanison study area serves as a conduit linking the central business district with areas to the south of the study area. Significant potential exists for increasing the traffic flow within the . study area, opening it up to potential development. Several transportation changes are proposed which will impact the study area. (see fig. 23 ) These iJlclude: 1. The re-routing of Alternate 19 north of the stUdy area 2. South Myrtle is proposed as a downtown connector (Downtown Redevelopment Plan) Court and Chestnut will become two-way, 4-Jane street 3. ConstrUction of Chestnut as a major approach to the Memorial Causeway 4. dead-cnd elimination on Magnolia S1. S. Creation of internal connector streets to eliminate dead~ends at Pine Streett Jasmine Way, and A" Street 6. Creation of 4~lane extension ofLakevjew Road to Missouri Avenue 7. Extend bus route on Druid Road Other improvements which are necessary for making the pedcstian enviroment more palatable are: . Sidewalk extensions and improvements (improved pedestrian accessibility) . Establishment of strectscape guidelines for South Fort Hanison Ave., S. Myrtle Ave. and other streets in the South Fort Harrison region. ( see fig. 24 ) . Establish guidelines for the landscaping and buffering of the proposed Pinellas Trail. (see fig. 25 ) FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON SruDY REPORT -. ~~_">I .( " p :.' /"'. II I \~..... r. ---, . ~\.~,,- , . t. ~ I , ! . I .~ \,.. atl.l.J:4IR Figure 23. Map of Proposed Transportation Changes for the South Fort Harrison Study Area FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH 32 I. I.. - SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 33 1 .. J" J ,. J r t Figure 24. Typical section through development along the Pine lias Trail I . U!I~"T VA1t1t5 ~ --.:-.:..:::..-::::rr- ...---..: _..__11 _____~. I .. , t. I .. , ,. , " , .: : J ... 4.- ~ Fig~rc 25. Typical section through mixed-use development along S~llth Fort Harrison FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 34 Geographic Information System (GIS) Analysis A desktop Geographic Infonnation System (GIS), Mapinfo 4.0 (Mapinfo Corporation, Troy, New York), was used to examine a variety of factors that influence the character of the South Fort Harrison study area. The GIS analysis was used to: · analyze and map demographic variables . calculate existing zoning and land use area · calculate land area for proposed zoning changes e analyze zoning and land use compatibility · summarize and map property value data · examine relationships among the aforementioned variables Data Collection Digital data sources for the GIS analysis included the Pinellas County Propeny Appraiser, the PinelJas County Planning Department, field surveys, the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization. the City of Clearwater Central Permitting department, and the 1990 U.S. Census of Population and Housing. A digital base map of the study area was obtained from the City of Clearwater Central Pennitting ,department. This base map was used as a template by which land use and zoning polygons were digitized and coded by type. Land use polygon boundaries were detenn~ned by conducting several field surveys and compiling the information on a paper map. The completed digitized map provided a base table by which to add additional infonnation for the purpose of identifying non-confonning uses, calculating land area ratios, calculating vacancy percentages, and analyzing property value distribution. Demographic data was collected for the stUdy area, the surrounding b.locks, and the city of Clearwater from the 1990 U.S. Census of Population and Housing STFIB and STF3A.. Comparisons were made of these three areas for a variety of demographic variables including population, income, occupied housing units, and renter/owner occupied housing units. Boundaries were drawn delineating the South Fort Hanison study area and surrounding blocks using Mapinfo software and TIGERlLine™ (U.S. Deparnnent of Commerce, 1992) files. I I I Property value data was obtained from the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. The Property Appraiser provided the Florida Center with a database that contained all properties within the study area and several attributes for each property. These attributes included SOH limited value. land use, property use, street address, township, section, range, and block number. SOH limited value was chosen because this value represents revenue collection value. The records were then imported into Mapinfo and geocoded to the appropriate parcel and within the appropriate land use polygon. Data Analysis Following the completion of data acquisition, a GIS database was built. To begin the process, each land use polygon was coded with its land use code and a number of fields. These fields included existing FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ) . ',' . .c~ ~. ;:" ", .'.j": SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 35 zoning, square acres. confonning/non-confonning land use, proposed zoning 1, proposed zoning 2, proposed zoning 3, and SOH limited value. Land area was calculated for existing'land use, existing zoning, and all three zoning proposals. Finally, the total value and percent vacancy for each land use was calculated. As previously discussed, property value data was geocoded by parcel. The parcel-level property value data was then aggregated for each land use type. Using the land area infonnation derived from the GIS, a thematic map was generated displaying land value per square acre. Land Use and Zoning Compatibility A cross-tabulation 'analysis was completed to assess the levels of non-conforming land uses in the study area. As previously mentioned, each land use polygon was coded for both land use and zoning. A table was created that included aHland use polygons where the land use code did not match the zoning code (i.e. IL and Vacant Land). Each non-matching polygon was then re-coded as either conforming or non- conforming. This was accomplished by examining the Land Development Code and Building Development Regulations as well as identifying grandfathered land uses. Demographics Demographic variables were also thematically mapped using Mapinfo. This pennitted visualization of population, housing, and income distribution trends. Land area for the study area; the surrounding blocks, and the city of Clearwater was calculated. This infonnation was entered into a spreadsheet and used to compare population and housing densities for the three aforementioned areas. " FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH - " SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 36 Demographic and Housing Characteristics Summary of Demographics · Population and HU Density low when compared to surrounding blocks and City · Those that do live in study area are mostly renters of labor force age (18-65) and live in the northern half of the study area " Owner-occupied mid to high income Harbor Oaks to the west of study area · Mixed renter/owner occupied low to middle income housing to the east of study area PenODS , .< Population density in the South Fon Harrison study area is relatively low when compared with the surrounding blocks and the City of Clearwater. Most of the 270 persons that live in the South Fort Harrison Study area arc located in the northern halft and live primarily in multi-family dwellings (U.S. Census of Population and Housingt 1990). . The study area, howevert is flanked by areas of moderate to high density housing units to the eastt west and south. Persons living to the west of the study area primarily live in the Harbor Oaks subdivision. located just northwest of the study area. This area is mostly comprised of middle to high income residents and owner-occupied housing units. Persons to the east and south of the study area live primarily in higher densityt mixed renter/owner occupied housing units, and have a median household income significantly lower than the Harbor Oaks residents. i I.' < ~ ': I " " I,.' i:. '. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNIlY DESIGN + RESEARCH -; SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 37 ",".~~~."7'~t';f '~~~~';'.;:~::7_ ~jt \ ~ , i \ I ....r:..~.. J. )~""!'"~~-'\'':''.(i''' ~ ::t" ... . .0' ~ I . :.I.~~~i".:-.jo"!~~-U-':~:JI':4r:"~":' + . ~.~.::~;..: .- '.~ ."'_""lfi"..."""""" .'..,"" "".' """' -", ~ n."'%:i:~~ .J~~~;;,;,t-l;.~:- -. /-, . .~:':.;=~.:'"t,. ~~:~',,~':';:1. z.o. ...!~..,O.12S.'.~.". 0.25"..:""" :t' t, ,.: \ -:7.:... . ..:....~~...;'-r:...,J.-:..4:. '.i..t'l,-~." . .... ....... -, ';::.1. . .T.y,.r.... "'..~MdllB . ",'"",,"(. ...",,;;,., ~ -tirlt.w...........,\':L~"..~ .:,--~.'" ',r, .~.....,-"~:' . - .......~~=~-~;.,.. .. 4".t::.I~4' ~.. "Io-:;:'~~ . ~ __ .~_ .~~..4 II. ... :'$f-~ ~ ~r:~~....~ qtJf.!~~r~"f't \ - . a;-' . . ~~-! -. ~.: ...A :Wi . .... " C :....."'"ut 51 . ~'H",,^.e' ~,. ~" I~t!""" I ....., ;t~ :..J..."'".'-i:. .-oJ, ''''v........,...~~..I'..-~'*'t.".....-i~. ....J , ,IJ::_ ~~~ ~:p-.;:1~k~r."..r;~tf-:.: - ! ~:.rt j~;.t: ":1i" ~"!.~~,-i'-.~. . !~...=~/.;:.:;; i . - ,'~ ~.-~. __.-.4 ..~--~.!, .r.-:.......-- .~::.: -'.- .:::~~~. .~~!;. ;:";ir.r Tumet St Ul .... ~.. ~~ u"':;:iJ~ m' ,. -~W~~ ! (- /, ~ .. - "'. '.. ". .'-!If.i., ""'''',~ ;2 . -~~ _-.r...ar.l ~1;J_~. y:';',,--: PiMSI r ~.,~ '-h4l'1I ~.;~.t._ .f{' ~ ~.. ,~.~ T en .f +~:'::'::-^..-~J:;: ~ i: ..... :Q;;;'~~1f \-. ~".F.~~~'''' ....1: ......,..:r...!...';"n~' ~ .~.-t- .... .. .. . .:..~... ~ ~.:S~ #~. \oIt. _;p~ ,::.r- . -,r:;-':I.-;iiJi ~ . ~ .~~l'lil:l~: E- r. ~~......,.., ....:.w-~ . .~ t1'..."", .. ...;-.;;~, II 0 ~'l.,\'!'-\ - ....... . l.- .....~. . UIr -:-"'* I ~i;_ ~j~~; Way ~"!..~~ 4 ~.._'~ ~.r. ~~ II . , :I ~tr~.~., ~~ toll 'Nlb Dr \.....t: . ....1Ji\..,. / .t f---../ ~~~~, '~40"""" ~~ 0 ~i!!IJ...... t~ "( .i I ~ .....~'. .J...'(j!fMSidco",~ . ! ~~~l...,.iNt~~.. ~~J1t~ . ~.:r.~. -~~ I .,............. ~f~...l\~, U !!"o ~~...-; I ! ~'i;tr~...': . 0 _ +~~~ , .\ . 0 ~.,.:~ ~.'- . ~ --:-_:~"t ':ti:"t-- . i' ~ I - Sl ;.l":!'......~" .,,_ . \ _-:.t , ['7"';i, .....; ~ _...::. I-- . . ~~~":\~~;W!l;'f l -~ Plnellu SL "l:.~T"'lj.I"I"t;!. ...:o.~,..-:., 1 V~ ....;r..i~T...;~** . I I..:~~~::t:t):fa; ~;. :. la I ..... ~-I~~"f>>. " . .4.1.......-,. . .......~:.:;~~..- . , .J --- ~~t~.:.~l. . .~;~.!i;'.=~ ~St RoId ~.~~~.~i-k: ~~ I . h- \ ...........:.::-:-.T BSt " ..1.-' -7- . --., ,- -- "'11..." I I - - :1- f _.~:~\~'~\1~~~. I . . ...4....... '" I, .'_',. ~ .-..: . .'. . .... .. . .. ... , '.:. ~.. - . - N \ -,"- .. -. - " .. ~RNd T \ L \ LJ - s..-r.IL'.s. c-.........--....,~ ,,,,,. \ I Figure 26. Persons per Block in South Fort Harrison Study Area (Source: U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1990) FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH > . ". ., ~ " saum FORT HARRlSON STUDY REPORT 38 Turner St g[ , :7.;:":~; j:~1~: ~-:.~':.i~: .t:.-I . _. .. :.:=- '" ,,:~- .t ~ I .- . - .... . ...... "-" '"J PlneIlU CoIbItt St RoICI Persons pc:r Am In Soulh Fan fUniaon Stud~ Ala . 110 ~6 ,..) iii Ieo 7 N) o 010 I (~) ~BMl Io.wn II: S c_.,.......- ...,._" loocn Figure 27. Persons per Acre by Block in South Fort Harrison Study Area (Source: U.S. Census of Population and Housingt 1990) FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNl1Y DESIGN + RESEARCH . . I' . ~ '._ I. I"; , " i: I.' . I" I" TO" SOUTH FORT, HARRISON STUDY REPORT Age Group Comparisons 48% 19% 12% 7010 43% .. . .. .". I. /. I ."." I."'... . . , . . ..', - , ',' PeQ,onl in Study Ar.. Peraonl In Surrounding Blocka Persona In CI..rwater 39 C,' o Percent of Persons Under 18 . Percent of Persons O-.er 65 . Percent of Persons Under 18 and Owr 65 Table 3. Population and Age Comparisons of the South Fort Harrison Study Area to Surrounding Blocks . and City of Clearwater .l FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH . , . , . . SOUTI-I FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT - - ~ - - - - . _.- ~ . . - - - - . ~ - ~ - ~ ~ Business District f l r Persons per Acre in Blocks Surrounding Fun HmiIM Slud,lI.aQ .151013 112) . I010:lS (69) m 310101l4H o 010 ) mS} Figure 27. Population Density in Blocks Surrounding South Fort Harrison Study Area 40 -.. if ...,..... f r -- ~ FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNIn' DESJGN + RESEARCH I ; i' I . _. SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT .. 41 Income District I , , ~ . .. .. . -,' I I I I I . '-'- I . : l "'_~i4 ...._..._... ""0 ',117 .. > -... J s [ Median Household Income by Blockgroup ill Fort Harrison SlUdy An:IIIIld Vldnify . .....000.044.100 m . 29.70Cho......OOO (21 ti!J 11.400 '029.700 ('" o 010 11..wo (4) r Figure 28. Median Income by Blockgroup for South Fort Harrison Study Area -- .- ... ,........ .1 r FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT: 42 Housing Vnits " 69% 62% Cl Owner Occupied Housing Units 54% . Renter Occupied Housing Units Study Area Surrounding Blocks CIty of Clearwater c, :.\ " .; " Table 4. Housing Unit Comparisons of the South Fort Harrison Study Area to Surrounding Blocks and City of Clearwater . . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH - SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 43 .. District -. if . .. So...... 1 -... f I r Housing UnilS per Acre in Blocks Surrounding Fen Hanis.oA SlUdy Ala . 101042 (21) . )1010 0431 iii 110 3 (821 o 0111 J {III} Figure 29. Housing Unit Density in Blocks Surrounding South Fort Harrison Study Area FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH - SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 44 1.6 Average Persona per Acre In Study Ar.a Figure 30. Population Density Comparisons Average Persons per Acre 6.4 Average Penon. p.r Acre In Surrounding 6.2 i ; e , Average Peraon. per Acre In City of CIe.rwat., FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ~ 11;.\I&-l''''!JI~hf.~iH..i i,.< ;j.: .....:t~:.;f....w-Y -....... '" t'~'., t". _\.. " T.....,.... , ~. t. SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 45 Existing Zoning and Land Use Issues Overview of Existing Zoning Conditions The South Fort Harrison study district is comprised of 139.2 acres of urban real~estate in the southern downtown area of the City of Cleanvater. The estimated value of its properties is $43,829,600 (see table 5). It is bounded to the north by Chestnut St. and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment District, to the west by South Fort Harrison Ave., to the east by properties adjoining both sides of South Myrtle Ave., and to the south by uEu S1. (see fig. 31). There are seven different zoning classifications contained within the study area: Industrial Limited OL), Office Limited (OL), Commercial General (CG), Commercial Neighborhood (CN), Publici Semi~Public, (P/SP), Master Planned Development (MPD), and Commercial Planned Development (CPD). The study area is subdivided into fourteen separate zoning parcels of various shapes and sizes. The following discussion will examine each of the different zoning categories in terms of bow their permitted land uses, developmental provisions, and requirements impact the current economic performance, growth potential, and general quality of life within the study area. This section will also explore these issues as they relate to its adjacent regions. Figure 31. Map of Existing Zoning in the South Fort Harrison Study Area FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STIJDY REPORT 46 Analysis of Current Zoning and Land Use Commercial General (CO) Commercial General is designed for community-oriented commercial and business functions. The 24 acres of Commercial General (CG) zoning have an estimated total value of $6,751,100 (see table 5). CG zoned properties in South Fort Harrison are located in the northwest quadrant and run south along South Fort Harrison Ave.. concluding at Jeffords S1. (see fig.31). The southern truncated ann, which extends from Druid St. to Jeffords St. is narrow. only a single lot parcel deep for the majority of its length. This lack of depth may prove to be a deterrent to new commercial development requiring larger property requirements. CG zoning has no provisions for residential as a permitted land use. The revitalization of residential into the study area is perceived as highly desirable by our research target groups. IronicalJy the majority of South Fon. Harrison's remaining residential is located in this zoning district. Another desirable type of land use not permitted under CG but considered valuable by the City of Clearwater is research and development. Other CG zoning requirements which hinder South Fort HatTison's ability to accommodate the kind of urban density and economic growth sought by the City of Clearwater are a low F.A.R. of .4, deep set back requirements, and wide building separation requirements. These factors contribute to the present conditions of low building density. inefficient propeny utilization and the lack of an urban character for the region. Currently, property zoned as CG has the highest percentage of vacant land in the South Fort Hamson Study area (see table 5.). Derelict and neglected properties are prevalent throughout the area zoned CG. There are numerous instances of non-confonning and conditional land uses such as auto salvage yards, vehicle restoration facilities, and wholesale produce distribution operations. The combination of all these factors has proved to be a nuisance within the community as well as a source of irritation to the adjacent neighborhoods. The CO zoning has produced an extremely unattractive image along South Fort Harrison Ave. This visual austerity not only causes community image and morale to suffer but it may also serve to deter potential developers from investing in the region. Neighborhood Commercial District (CN) The Neighborhood Commercial District (CN), classification was created to accommodate single and multiple-family residential, neighborhood retail, service and professional activities that are compatible with residential neighborhoods. In the South Fort Harrison Study area there are 24 acres of land designated for eN zoning. The CN zoned land is divided into two distinct districts along the west side of South Myrtle Ave. (see fig.31). Both districts contain a total of only one residential property and neither are adjoined to any residentially zoned land. The southern CN district is bordered by Limited Industrial zoned land and the northern CN district is bounded to the west by the CSX tracks and CO zoning beyond (see fig.3)). Commercial Neighborhood zoning requires a low F.A.R. of .3, deep setbacks, and a maximum building height of 25 feet. There is a 13% land and/or building vacancy rate in the CN zoned areas. The vacant properties are found to be in generally poor condition. In the northern CN district, the presence of the Scotty's hardware store, with its outdoor storage yards and warehouse structures, does not seem to be in compliance with any of the pennitted or conditional uses as defined in the appropriate sections of the Commercial Neighborhood zoning code (Chapter 40. Zoning, Div. 17, Sec.40.323 and Sec.40.324 of the Clearwater Code). This property lacks sidewalks and any semblance of street or landscaping that would mitigate the visual offensiveness of its property. In summary, there is little evidence that current land use found in the CN districts is in accord with the FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH - SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 47 definition or original intent of Commercial Neighborhood zoning as it is stated in the Clearwater Zoning Codes. CN zoning may no longer be relevant to this area of South Fort Harrison. Limited Office Dish-iet (OL) The Limited Office (OL), zoning classification was fanned to establish professional office developments which are compatible with surrounding residential neighborhoods. Limited Office zoning controls the second greatest amount of property (30 acres) in the South Fort Harrison Study area. OL zoning yields the highest land value per acre ($396.817/acre). of all the zoning types in the study area. (see table 5.). There is a relatively high 20% vacancy rate in OL zoning. The majority of the office activity occurring in the OL districts is medical professional. The OL zoning of South Fort Harrison is sulxlivided into four separate districts. The largest, located between Druid Rd. and Magnolia Dr., contains 8 large office park, the DruhiJI Professional Center. The remaining OL districts are found along stretches of South Myrtle and Lakeview Rd. (see fig.31). Some of the best examples of landscaping, streetscaping, and buffering in the study area occur on professional office properties. Many of the office facilities on South Myrtle Ave. are converted from attractively renovated residential structures. Research reveals that owners of OL zoned property feel threatened that Morton Plant Hospital's planned 100,000 sq.ft. medical professional office strUcture will drastically reduce the market demand for their office space. Furthennore, these land owners arc of the opinion that OL zoning is too limited in the permitted uses it offers, leaving them with few viable options to fall back on if the market for professional office space collapsed. A primary concern expressed by property owners was the absence of commercial retail as a pennitted land use option in OL zoning. Many of the residential structures currently being used as professional office space can adapted for reuse as retail and/or business services. Another prevailing concern was that provisions for retail land use are necessary to accommodate the businesses displaced by the proposed Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The planned conversion of South Myrtle into a major commercial corridor also requires retail~friendly zoning, currently not available in Office Limited. Limited Industrial (IL) The Limited Industrial (IL). zoning category was designed to contain light manufacturing and related uses. IL zoning is the most flexible zoning classification in the study area. Other permitted uses include research and development, business services, business/professional offices, and indoor retail sales (Chapter 40. Zoning, Div. 27, Sec.40.S03 and Sec.40.504 of the Clearwater Code). IL zoning also provides for the highest F.A.R. rating in the study area, .75. South Fon Harrison has 43.5 acres or 3 1% of its total acreage zoned as IL. This is the largest contiguous parcel of IL zoned property in the City of Clearwater. Research reveals that it would be advantageous to the City to preserve the integrity of the land area of this zoning in order to accommodate valuable light industrial activity at a scale unequaled within the Clearwater city limits. The average land value is S325,951/acre. The 12.5 acres of vacant property translates to 8 vacancy rate of 29%, second highest in the South Fort Harrison region. Research reveals that this relatively high vacancy rate can be attributed to the expense of renovating property to adapt to new uses, high impact fees imposed by the city, and the incompatibility of adjacent zoning. In addition, the convoluted form of the district causes awkwardly sized, narrow parcels, which may be difficult to develop (see fig. 31). FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 48 Master Planned Development (MPD) There arc two Master Planned Development dIstrIcts in the study area, both owned by Monon Plant Hospital. The larger of the two districts is located in the heart of the South Fort Harrison study area (see fig.31). Bounded to the north by Magnolia Dr., to the south by Grand Central Ave., to the enst by the CSX tracks, and to the west by the proposed routing of the Pinellas Trail, the district is being utilized as a large parking lot with a capacity of 734 cars. The second, smaller district is located on South Fort Harrison Ave., south of Grand Central Ave., contains Morton Plant's central utiHty plant and parking for an additional 207 automobiles. The South Fort Harrison site is furnished with a 10ft. planted buffer. The large parking lot has a 5 ft. planted buffer along the PineUas Trail route. The total of 13.4 acres of MPD property (estimated value 52,771,700) is not on the city tax rolls because or Monon Plant Hospital's non- profit status. Commercial Planned Development (CPO) Located at 926 South Myrtle Ave., this small 1.48 acre parcel is zoned CPD to allow for a newly constructed 64 bed adult congregate living facility, Magnolia Manor (see fig.31). The property is welJ landscaped and buffered from the adjacent material storage facility to its west. Public I Semi-Public (P/SP) There are 17.25 acres of land designated as P/SP zoning in the South Fort Harrison region. The zoning is subdivided into three different sites: the cemetery at the intersection of South Myrtle Ave. and Lakeview Road, St. Cecelia Catholic Church on South Myrtle Ave., and Lion of Judah Church, also on South Myrtle Ave. (see fig. 31). The property value of the three parcels combined is an estimated $4,132.600. The cemetery, located at the southern entrance or gateway to South Myrtle Ave.. is in desperate need of roadside landscaping and buffering from adjoining properties. Attention to this matter is especially important when one takes into account that South Myrtle Ave. is projected to become a major downtown connector corridor in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. In the interest of establishing a positive community image at this highly visible intersection. embellishment of this area should receive high priority. The total amount of land utilized as P/SP, 32.3 acres, far exceeds that which is zoned as such. A significant land portion of the study area (23%), valued at $9,372,500, is not part of the City of Clearwater's tax rolls. This includes the Morton Plant holdings, the cemetery, local churches, and city properties. Summary of Existing Zoning and Land Use The following is a brief summary of the major conditions and issues that characterize the existing land use and zoning of the South Fort Harrison area. . Small Specialized Districts . Limited Use Flexibility . Incompatible Adjacencies . Poor Accommodation of Market Demands . High Percent Vacancy FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN -+- RESEARCH - I I' I SOUTH FORT HARRISON STIIDY REPORT 49 · Neglected properties · Very Limited Residential · Low Density · High Percent of Conditional Uses · Lack of urban community character Zoning Description Acres Percent of Value'" Valuo'" per Acres Percont of Total Acre Vacant Vacancy Ught Industrial 43.44 31% 14,159.300 325,951 12.5 29% Office Umlted 29.75 21% 11.805,300 396.817 6.07 20% Commercial General 23.9 17% 6,751,100 282,473 8.19 34% Public I SemI-Public 17.25 12% 4.132,600 239,571 0 0% Master Planned Development 13.38 10% 2,771.700 207,152 0.68 5% Commercial Neighborhood 10 7% 3.749,900 374,990 1.27 13% Commercial Planned Development 1.48 1% 459,700 310,608 0 0% Total 139.2 100% 43,829,600 26.71 21% 0,;"1 .SOH Umlted Value In Dollars Table 5. Land Area imd Percentages of Zoning Types in Study Area ~ng ZaI*Ig Mll\.1.Gt Iia Mu.L.Ilt sn.t FWCInt d ,.A.R. (Aa'Mo'SqA1 Ma. HIIght {Ft., ~ ~ AIM fSq. AerIe) TabI LInd fFL) AIM ~ 0.3 e.coo Sq Fl 25 30% 25 1D N CclnwMn:IIIIICNl HI. <Zl:I :IS ~a..a O~ 10,OCOSqFl 150 -4D% H\.:o2O' 25 + 23.11 me, tCO) (tf.20J~'" u.-e.s CIftIcIt lOI.) 0.3 2.llOD Sq Fl 3Q 3ll'% 25 287~ 21* LJmIIad fnIMeolaI (IlJ 0.7$ "N:tu 60 l'iO% 20 43.44 ~1" 0.'1 wi trW-.po.1lIbDI, ~ D_Il5~ 1 .-a. 60 45% HI c2a 35 17.25 l~ If'1V) .-pt~ "':020 35 t.O wi haIjlQI ........ PI-.d MonanPln ~1.Cl{734 ~ Sl**1 us 7% ~"(MP01I ....... PtawMcl I.b1a1 PIn UliIIIy PlIn.., PM:ir-G 1aI ('lf11 Pa1cnQ Sl**l :Ui12 3% E>>vtilopll..nl fIIP02) CamNft:III r\InMd MIgrdII,.a; (~fMd ~l 1.48 t% ~"CCPD) Total t39~ tOO'll . Table 6. Existing Zoning Requirements FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNJlY DESIGN + RESEARCH - SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 50 l!I .UJ --- _t . .. ',' F.;{' -"-}:j-- ..- --.:.. '". :- ".:. . . ...1... .'f'~) f .. f.. r,.- i", .\0"- -= w. ...~~-';.:...-.::.:....: _.~ ~."7"._...:~.. ~II~""'':.~_. ....',... r n-..:.~___~__~ _ IK)"':\TO\\' IU:Pt:\ t:LO"M.:~T'PL" ,"",=,.-- ~.:::. ':k::'! f'II r J._ ..; . , .. .. -..... --... U'UOPUSt:D) - T=3::......:::..: . . - .~.:-;~I.. '! ~ -.. _, "if.........-, r' __ .~..c. ... ,f..._ 1 '--- .....:. ' :', t'''. .. - r:-:-: "'r;. _.1 .:(:::. EZ::1;~x""'''''~~.' -'" ~ .........--. t ----:,:'. '''''''''':"':.';''' _~t- :~%b'_.. -.... -...-. -..,,,,.: ~. ... :""" ,;'.~ -'~1- .J .--. ....~--_.... ... .)f...... '!.L' ....+_~ ...;....:..!:;.:=....:::J:.....:~....:. e _. =:::c:::: ( Ioftl..' "-I. . Ii lG.JJ> '.--- ,,', .,. -:.._- t ~'4:~' .. n '-'-1:' - :;.."- ..... ..';:':"'.t.- ..~. - "-:-'.-:~~' .-. '.1, } ;I ,. " ~ BELl.F.AIIt ...., _.'~...: Figure 32. Map of Existing Land Use in the South Fort Harrison Area FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH - SOUTH FORT HARRlSON STUDY REPORT 51 Land Use Description Acres Percent of Total Total Value. Value. per Acre Ranked Value Public SemI-Public 32.3 23% 9,372,500 290,170 4 Office 31.86 23% 13,681,800 429,435 1 Vacant Land 24.44 18% 4,301,300 175,994 8 Commercial 18.82 14% 7,641,200 406,015 2 Light Industrial 16.92 12% 4,958,600 293,061 3 Residential Single-Family 8.78 6% 2,257,000 257,062 7 Vacant Building 4.91 4% 1.290,700 262,872 6 Residential Multf..Family 1.18 1% 326.500 276.695 5 Total 139.2 100% 43,829.600 Table 7. Land Area Statistics by Land Use in Study Area '. -~ -- .. .. I" 4..:..... ..4~1;. .- .. '. ," . ...,.... .. ~ t !t. '. ~ . .. Figure 33. Vacant Properties in South Fort Harrison Study Area FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH "." t '_L~ ~.' '1..... ~.... , '. ~.... ~. .' ~ " SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT ... ~mr.~" U _. 'f- ,_ ~ ;_~ :"fUl' ~11" " '., i I... '::~U~'''SI U Pine'SI: I , "Qruld ~~~ "'.'-, '~. :~L"-'." .: . ,- . ,l~~'~,:; , I" ~ :', - ..~~~~I}~~... .. . . . If: , .' '~",~fhT:" c.; =:~i:"., II IJlllt '. Rt,' <. Jdronh Sh ,. ':. -...:.. , " ..... ~. -'~::~:<'~'S- ~.:~, II DI-'~ .-:.. .. t. ~.. ' .' !"' . aHi'll ., "- .............- .... ~,., .. - ..... :._~. ;~ :~ ~~... 1:~~:Pi;ellasSI..a~ ;~.'_.. , . ; " P:SP.. .......... " .:~-:; 0_ :...::~ . ... H ~ C. ~_P'"' . ;,:,;- . . - -- ..... .. ......... .: ~ -..... ,- ~.." . -:':. , - _. - u_' I,. . .AS 6... ..__..... -;; .. _H ,. y", , < .1: ...0 'u\f.l, " __.'S .. ''''-, = . , . 1: .....,.. '..... .~ ~ - .. . ~: ~..~-:. .. . - OL ...,.... ~." ....: OL . . . 52 J.6;"I' }.. .0- .- ._ t,...: c ~.- .-. < A'..~ ::t~. " .... ... .... . ~.: ~;; .: 0 (I) : Rt.:":2 Grand CcnlraL~~. . ~.... . .,-&~~J..I ~ Tuskawitll1 51. r~'.~ ~ 'r...t \",;I.t "..' .... SOH Umilcd Value per Square Acre by LlDd Uac in SoW Fon tb1Uon Sllollly Nl::l . ),240.000105.soo.000 1]1 . ~6Il.000 10 3~40.000 1;\2) CJ 120.00010 560.000 (911 o 010 120.000 1421 . . ,,':: ,. , (~:!.~'.::J " Figure 34. Value per Acre by Land Use in the South Fort Harrison Study Area FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STl!DY REPORT 53 Zoning and Land Use Alternatives This section contains three alternative zoning strategies for the South Fort Harrison study area. The Florida Center has based these proposals on the cumulative results of our field investigations. the interview process. data collection, public meeting input.. and case study research. The proposals may differ in the zoning types and quantities recommended. However, all three proposals emphasize increased growth and prosperity for the South Fort Harrison area. This prosperity may be realized through: · Attraction of high.tech medical related development · Encouragement of flexible efficient mixed-use projects e Increases in land utilization through high density design e. Fostering strong awareness ofimportmlt vicinity issues, actors, and events e Developing the ability to capitalize on these relationships . Exploitation of opportUnities created by the proposed Pinellas Trail . Creation of a strong positive urban identity for the South Fort Harrison community Zoning Proposal ##1 · Commercial Jnfill replaces Commercial General - Provides for Residential Development · Commercial Infill replaces Office Limited and Commercial Neighborhood Districts on South Myrtle . Commercial Jnfill provides grcater land use flexibility . Commercia! Jnfill better equipped to accommodate Morton Plant and downtown redevelopment . Industrial Limited core remains unchanged . Small pedestrian park (OSIR) on South Fon Harrison . Land Use F.A.R. essentially unchanged In Zoning Proposal #1, the emphasis is on promoting redevelopment of the area through the conversion of CG and several CN and OL zoning districts into a larger consolidated and more adaptable zoning district. Commercial Infill (eI) zoning was selectcd for this purpose, and was chosen primarily for its flexibility of permitted land use. CI zoning pennits virtually aU of the land uses currently aJlowed in the stUdy afea, namely the uses pennitted by the separate CG, CN, and OL districts. In addition, research facilities and laboratories, prohibited in CG, CN, and OL, are permitted in the proposed CI zoning. These uses arc also permitted in the existing IL zoning. The combination of these two zoning districts provides for 8 total of 106 acres available for research and development, medical clinics/laboratories, business/professional, and commercial type uses. This flc"ibiJity would be advantageous in enabling the stUdy area to effectively respond to the evolving market demands imposed by such major external actors as Morton Plant Hospital, the proposed Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. and the economic development goals of local government. Furthermore, the reclassification to CI zoning enhances the City's ability to attract research and development to the study area. The South Fort Harrison community would be zoned to accommodate the growth of medica) related industries associated with the Morton Plant Hospital complex, and simultaneously prepared to absorb any business displacement caused by the implementation of downtown redevelopment. We also recommend that CI zoning be ~xtended to both the east and west sides of South Myrtle Ave. I FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRlSON STUDY REPORT 54 light of South Myrtle's nnticipa:ed conversion to a major nonh/south downtown connector as proposed by 'the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This strategy enables property owners greater response latitude to changing market demands along the South Myrtle corridor. I Information collected in the interviews and public meetings indicated a desire for the expansion of multi- famHy residential properties in the stud}' area. Residential use is currently limited to 40 acres of CN and OL zoning located primarily along South Mynle Ave.. Zoning Proposal #1 permits multi-family residential in the 67 acres of CI zoning. This would make the 24 acres of CG zoning in the northeast comer of the study area available for residential developmentt much of which is currently vacant or underutilized. The core area of the Limited Industrial zoning remains virtually intact in this proposal, losing only 5 acres to the proposed CI zoning. This loss occurs primarily along South Fort Harrison Ave., in order to better capitalize on the infill opportunities which occur along this corridor. . Zoning for a small park is proposed along South Fort Harrison Ave. on a vacant parcel in front of the AMP building. This site was selected because it is well shaded by a number of large live oak trees and is located directly across from the Morton Plant Hospital campus. The areas zoned as MPO, CPO, and P/SP remain unchanged. bnnj} PIcpauI 1 tlU.lA ~~ f-,"- tIU. HIIsn {ft.l ~ IlNilI.a.dl IRl MIII~l lcall..rd AM ~-'''''''1Cl 04 ~.m :D% U< m.te . """ bUIIW L-.cI~ on eo I!lJ% 2D 3llD7 2Il% Nile, IMU'IMc (PlWl .7. .e.5 eo 45'l!, 36 12% 17.25 as- __'.........lOMIl ~ ~ N/A 315 Ollll 1% .......~.......'_.t CW01I Morlan PI.nt Puking Lal (t.W~~1 8<1& N ....."'-' ~_.t lW'mI "'arlan Plant UWlly PI.nlancl Parking Lall2J7P1tW1g~) 3.112 3'llo ~....~_.t ....gnall. ACLF (Oot8acl~1 1.00 1% tCPOl 'oaf 1SlZ2 1lXl% .'1 Table 8. Zoning Proposal # 1 FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH " .. _.:::""..... . SOUTH FORT HARRlSON STUDY REPORT 55 \ \ ~. ., . . -,~,~.t t __....1...:-; / . . .. . :i. .. ... ~ -. .,. .....'- . . - ..- .' - . .. . . ., ~ ........ '" I i.;r- ,~. ' '111"'1 "'r' -!.:. . :~O). ...;. ... T '. .. ,,:p:.p.': -: I~.tt~ ~, . . . . .... I' ,::;:':;... 'r .. "." I . . ..:;..... _~.. ''':,'' ~. h, ,.111 U.I .-=: 'E-!r;~ I ... : I ti ...... . ... :.. _ : Q:-:1-' .'.i"Rllla. \\.1 J t':" " . '~i. . ~.~. :r:':"l .', .. +,' . ~. . t,~~1 o :; ;/"...... :~ ! ~~:: i ;.-:~ 11_'0 I f:":'-l \ ,* t ==1 J -..... ROSS '\UJU U:-' f.,\f{f\ ('()~wu:x I l . "-. ...; :. ~ \..-- aJl-:LLF.,\IR r~ v V"'-J --.....-_.--- .. Figure 35. Map of South Fort Harrison Area Showing Zoning Proposal #1 FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNIlY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 56 Zoning Proposal #2 · Downtown Mixed Use (D/MU) provides for increased land use intensity (F.A.R. 1) · DIMU adjacent to downtown redevelopment · DIMU borders and encompasses proposed Pinellas Trail route · DIMU increases Residential/Commercial Mixed-Use Development · ILRD replaces Industrial Limited - Accommodates Light Industrial, Commercial, and R&D uses (F.A.R. .75) · ILRD area increased · ILRD runs full length of CSX route · SmalJ pedestrian park (OS/R) extended to PineHas Trail · Commercial InfiH buffer provided on east side of South Myrtle · Residential capacity increased Zoning Proposal #2 promotes redevelopment of the study area primarily through the employment of two principle zoning strategies. The first strategy involves the conversion of the CO and OL zoning west of the CSX right-or-way into a Downtown/Mixed Use (D/MU) zoning district. This measure is viewed as an appropriate response, considering the proximity to Clearwater's Centra) Business District. DIMU increases the F.A.R. level from the current levels of .4 (CO) and .3 (OL) to an F.A.R. level of 1.0. The emphasis on residential-commercial mixed use is in response to the interview, research, and public meeting da~ which demonstrated support for such development. Because much of the northern portion of the proposed PineUas Trail route is embraced by the DIMU district, an attractive inducement for creative development will develop. The DIMU designation also accommodates the need for medical cUnics, laboratories. and office space resulting from the Mticipated continued growth of Morton Plant Hospital. We recommend that the DIMU minimum height requirement be increased from the 35ft. maximum for non-residential, to the 50ft. required in CG. This height restriction relaxation will open the area to greater intensity and variety of building than is available under current height guidelines. The second major strategy of Zoning Proposal #2 is the transformation and enlargement of the Industrial Limited zoning district into an entirely new zoning classification: Limited IndustriallResearch and Development (1L1RD). This zoning category would permit nil the land uses included in the Limited Industrial (IL) and the Research. Development, and Office Park (RD) zoning types. A key feature of this plan is that the ILRD district maintains constant contact with the CSX rail lines. which run the entire length of the South Fort Harrison region. This is done to facilitate rail availability in this zoning district which may possibly serve to attract new industries which require rail access. The total acreage of this proposed new zoning district is increased to 62.28 acres from the 44 acres of the previous IL zoning. The new zoning district would retain the higher .75 F.A.R. of the IL zoning, as opposed to the lower .4 F.A.R. required by RD zoning.]t is our belief that this zoning strategy will best be able to assist the: City of Cleanvater in its attempts to atttact high-tech, medical research type of industJy. We also recommend that CI zoning be extended to run along the east side of South Myrtle Ave. in anticipation of South Myrtle becoming 8 major north/south downtown connector and consequently evolving into a major commercial corridor. This strategy enables property owners greater response flexibility to the changing market demands imposed by the new South MYJ:lle corridor. Zoning for a small park is also proposed along South Fort Harrison Ave. on a vacant parcel in front of the AMP building. This site was selected because it is well shaded by a number of large Jive oak trees and is located directly across from the Morton Plant Hospital campus. The park is reaches out to the FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ," , r., " " SOUTI-I FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 57 proposed PineJlas Trail route by way of an attractiveJ}' landscaped esplanade. This is done with the intent to make the proposed trail more easily accessible to the thousands of Morton Plant employees. The areas zoned as MPD, CPD, and P/SP remain unchanged. ~ IliIIIId u.. IDMUI c.-nw IrftI (a) PlMc, .....~ lM't o,tIft -..,....... ~ __n.no., JI[, II .-atJ __.....tII...l~ /W02) C._ull.W.....Dlwtrr 1Ft f~ T.w ".1 "M ~: ;..",. : :;,>;' .Table 9. Zoning Proposal #2 " .. ~ . ~ .' . ,. ~. . 1~ . ' ;.\', " 'r , !t: I, i .' ZIlfWlg Plq:IoUI2 lIu.\..ol ,.... d I'AA ..... ....,. (A.) ~ ...~(l'L1 An-.1~1 TEItal Land ,.,.. S$.UI) &enr. 10" M.e4 ~ U ~.r.o :KI'Il. 15" II ''A. D."B 50 to'Jo 20 tI2.a 4Mlo .7. .16 50 ~ 35 t21l 17.2:5 ll.25 25 NI" :l5 D.llll ,,, ,",orton Plut P.tlo.lnll Lot (734~~1 II." n. "orlan PI.nt UIIIl', Pl.ft' ud P.tlllnll LIlI(Zl1I'WrlatO~1 :t.1l2" ~ ".Onoll. Ael.I' l'M1*I~ t.. ,,, 13D,2 1~ ~_M'''''~+fld'I.)I'''~t'''':a'. :a~...n.'....~d..... ....~I" 4',._ .H' . . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH I K~:li~,*~~lt;,.'.-,..._,..u,_. - . .- 'J~ I ~~, ~ . ',. < . SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 58 . t , , . .. ~. ~. ~......1 .. _ t. rwm, um, Klm'\ tl.ur\fI."r rL..\' -.-::-}.: .... -..--..... . - .-. . . _.__ .._c. _, .1;':_;:' .: .:.;....: - j i~ -: : . . ,......... . " .r::,;. '_-::_'.~'. ~....: ~D.- C":""'_~ ....._ ..~- .-, I" .-.,-.. ...;.t .-....-. · -.. . ~.:-- -:::._. ~-f : i . -r-.. .~ ( ..,.,..1 IIC-l . -.. - . ---.. ~ , -, .1"... . ...-..- . . '- It. .' .....:..;~ . . ,+ '. , , . -. HU.I.'.<\IN ~ ../ L ._ J \" , ~. : ROo" .'UK ..):\ I','NI.; ('Cl'''''''. X - . . ..., . "I' . :. .~~ '.i~ 'J '............ ~ . .. .... . . . . .~ ,;......:. .. ,... :.' .. . . '. '., .....,... .... .. III __..f..... Figure 36, Map of South Fort HBlTison area showing Zoning Proposal #2 FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH 11 - sourn FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 59 Zoning Proposal #3 . Downtown /Mixed Use (DIMU) provides for increased land use intensity (F .A.R. I) . Creation of a She Plan Incentive District overlay . DIMU adjacent to downtown redevelopment . DfMU borders and encompllSses proposed Pinellas Trail route . DIMU increases Residential/Commercial Mixed-Use Development . ILRD replaces Industrial Limited -- Accommodates Light Industrial; Commercial; and R&D uses (F.A.R. .75) . ILRD area increased . ILRD runs full length of CSX route . Small pedestrian park(OSIR) extended to PinelJas Trail . Commercial Jnlin buffer provided on east side of South Myrtle · Residential capacity increased The final zoning alternative proposal creates the opportunity for intense and diverse development in the South Fort Hanison district. The northwestern quadrant of the South Fort Harrison Study area is converted from a collection of Commercial General and Office Limited zoning districts into a single large Downtown! Mixed Use zoning category. This district has a total area of is 3S acres and is bounded by the proposed Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan on the north; South Fort Harrison Ave. to the west, Grand Central St. to the south; and the projected route of the Pinellas Trail to the east. This district also contains a Site Plan Incentive District, (SPID) overlay which covers the DIMU district north of Magnolia Dr. (see fig. 37.) The purpose of creating a Site Plan Incentive District overlay is to encourage property owners to submit mixed.use Planned Development;(pD); project proposals. Planned Development projects offer comprehensively designed land use recommendations which may include extra site improvements and urban amenities for the City. Subject to approval by the City Commission, Planned Developments may earn certain land use bonuses or greater latitude in dealing with prescribed land use restrictions and/or requirements. As in Zoning Proposal #2, this alternative also converts and expands the Industrial Limited zoning district into an entirely new zoning classification, Limited IndustriallResearch and Developmen4 (lURD). This new zoning classification would pennit all the land uses included in the Limited Industrial (lL) and the Research, Development; and Office Park(RD)zoning types. The total acreage of this proposed new zoning district is increased to 62.28 acres from the 44 acres of the antecedent IL zoning. The new zoning district would retain the higher .75 F.A.R. of the IL zoning as opposed to the lower .4 F .A.R. required by RD zoning. A key feature of this plan is that the lLRD district maintains constant contact with the CSX rail lines which run the entire length of the South Fort Harrison region. This is done to facilitate rail availability in this zoning district and possibly serve to attract new industries which require rail access. It is our bcliefthat this zoning strategy will best be able to accommodate the City of Clearwater's ability to attract the high tech, medical research type of industry that they desire. CI zoning is extended to run along the cast side of South Myrtle in anticipation that when South Myrtle becomes a major north/south downtown connector, as proposed by the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, it will evolve into a major commercial corridor. This strategy enables property owners a greater latitude of response to the changing market demands along the changing South Myrtle corridor. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNIn' DESIGN + RESEARCH . I,,:', ..~ .. ~ . ,', SQum FORT HAJiRISON STUDY REPORT 60 Zoning for a small park is proposed along South Fon Harrison Ave. on a vacant parcel in front of the AMP building. This site was selected because it is well shaded by a number of large live oak trees and is located directly across from the Morton Plant Hospital campus. It is connected to the proposed Pinellas Trail by a tree lined promenade. The areas zoned as MPD. CPD, and P/SP remain unchanged. Zanng~3 Mu.lot "--'II af fAIL IIaJl. HIIoN /R.) ~ .....1oItIMdI /R.) AIM ,14A-) Toul UncI AItII ~ ML*IM CCMUI , ~. '20 f1O'lo '0.. 3414 2M Con.A__WlI'CCIJ D4 35.l5D ~ ".. 11 11% ......... UnIlIIII........ 0.75 so lIO'II. 20 lIUlI 45~ Dr III' IIIIl .. (IJIIDf .. NIle,.... fI\McIP'l'II') .7-.tlIi so ~ :is ,:nr. n3S 0.-......,.......... couq o.2S 25 "fA 35 0.18 ,~ U-f'lIft DIwlo...... CW01I Marlon Plan' Parklno Lol (734~~1 ....e 7% U-PllnOl.lllpuAoI (MPD2J Morlan PlanlJ'\Ullr Plant and Puking LolC2Q7P1r1atlglif*iM1 lO2 :no ':II .,.... PIIn 0. A1PM\...A Maonolla AeLF (e4fMd~ 1.41 ,'" (CPO) T.., '392 1CII:;M Table 9. Zoning Proposal #3 , ' .' \">' FLORJDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH f.mflJAMi';:i''';.;.I.~';.Wo'~'''''' -,. ..... ..". ~'...,., .....1 " . ..... -.J.~. , .... SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 61 I t'HUI't).. .HI " ,. I . t r": ..... ; - c. :t" UO\\' f ()\\, NI:UI:n:UU':.n::"\l j,l.',\\" . .. - ..."... ...-. ~~~ 1 . '-~i::"''':- ~. .; ...::1;' :~, J -_. ,..........--1-.... . 'I" Ili,- tr~. .........,-....,:. I ..... , .. 1.: .,. ~ .-- 4 .. ~~.~ ~~ _.:~~:.-:~. f:j "L I --......... ~. ::.c.....-.~ ...- I.:"':. i::~. '--F"""--' ~. -,. .. ~-'( ~..I, 1._. Ell\. .- .":." .. .........:.- , ! . . "~."r ...;-.... ..;..... ~-', .: 1\ .. , .:" "=::1: .. ~.' ---.-. . ,.,. ......., ... t_, -- ~.~~ '.':.~ . ._-,' ..'. ...,.... .. .. "-'1-. .. , -' .~ . .... .....- - ....- .... 4_ . .;... . . . ~'i: ,. a. . . . . - . -. I .. . . <.- . ~'. In.I.l....\IR '. .- .. '*".~-_.'.:;:.. E..~.1~.. . "t. ~ t' t;~- - I " · ,'~.... , .~.. ~. ~: ~ +~.~..::. ~/. . : ;-\~, .-:--. . , .-.... ..,~ . .-..~ ....~ . ,t: ~,,~"'1.. "'\ ..:. .- - .. - ~.... ....:........... to .~:i: ;;::..,;. ;. t. ... .'~... ..IUI_'_', ~,:l' Figure 37. Map of South Fort Harrison area showing Zoning Proposal #3 FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH . ...:i j' , ~ <... " ~: , . ' '"<, ' ::::;.( " '(I~; -J; . '," . , .'i..' ,,::t' ~ :!l ~ . , . ."' , I', \. " \ I:. . ; ,. , . , . , " ! . e, ~ . '. I.e" .:' ~ ~ ':\ . " ~'~. . '" SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 62 Land Use and Design Development Recommendations Summary ofPoteDtiallmprovements Illustrated in the following pages are seven different conceptual urban design proposals generated by the Florida Center for the South Fort Harrison study. The intent of this exercise is to demonstrate that attractive, feasible, and marketable redevelopment can occur in the South Fort Harrison area when the right zoning and land use stratcgies are employed. The sites selected were either distressed properties, vacant land or infill conditions. Thc proposed design conceptsJocus on issues such as: · More Efficient Land Use · Reduction orv scant Land · Streets I Streetscape (poor sidewalk and dead-end conditions) · Landscape I Buffering conditions o 'Architectural Design (continuity) · The Pincllas Trail as community amenity and catalyst . The revival of residential neighborhoods · The introduction of mixed- use developments · Commercial infill · High tech and/or light industrial facilities as good neighbors ! i '. . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH .. ... . ~- '~","". SOU11-J FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT . 63 f' Proposal # J r ~ / I Key Map ....- \ \ \ \ ~ \\=0 "4 Figure 38. Site plan of Hi-Tech development proposal along PinelJas Trail FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH The .sites are a 2.75 acres vacant land parcel located behind the AMP facility along "N' St. and a 1.1 acre tree covered site on S. Ft. Hanison Ave. Proposed are the creation of a public park on S. Ft. Harrison Ave. and a high tech research facility on the vacant land behind AMP. The high tech facility will embrace the PinelJas Trail which is routed along the sites eastern edge. The dead end condition of 4'Au Sf. will be alleviated by opening a connector street Lakeview Rd. The PinelJas Trail is connected to the park on S. Ft. HlUTison Ave. by a tree lined esplanade. SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 64 Figure 39. Existing site of proposed Hi-Tech development Figure 40. High Tech Industrial Development along Pine lias Trail FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STIJDY REPORT Proposal # 2 r ~. i I / Key Map 65 ~<<a 811111111111n ~ ~~e. Figure 41. Site plan of Morten Plant - USF teaching facility proposal The site selected is the 9.46 acre parking lot owned by Morton Plant Hospital. This site is currently zoned MPD. Our proposal consists of the construction of the planned 201000 sq. ft. medical teaching facility and a parking garage facility to absorb the 734 displaced parking spaces. The proposed project will engage the PineUas Trail which runs along its western edge. Increased vehicular access to the project site is accomplished by creation of a connector street that stretches along the eastern border from Grand Central St. to Magnolia Dr. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 66 Figure 42. Existing site of Morton Plant Hospital parking (at Figure 43. Monon Plant Master Plan Development along Pinellas Trail FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 67 f \ I / / i D8 o . . . .. '. ......Ii.... .II................-"~UA II" ... .. ., r-t~ }~ Key Map Figure 44. Site plan for townhouse development with mixed~use as anchors Proposal # 3 The site is a 2.1 acre strip of land that runs from Magnolia Dr. to Druid Rd. Proposed is the creation of a townhouse community which is anchored at both ends by mixed~use projects. The PineUas Trail parallels the development affording residents a pedestrian convenience as well as a buffer from the office park complex to the east. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNIlY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT ~ .~. .. :~~~ ~ {,~ . -~ +. . Figure 45. Site of proposed townhouse and mixed-use development Figure 46. Mixed-use anchor of townhouse development along Pinellas Trail FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH 68 ym -7u--~~rri~~J\~~!~FP ~.:~~i> ";.~ l\~ (~ : ~'.{ ~. ,'.' ft....c\"'iJ\.,~'~.,(.'.':i...,.. !." , . '... . , ~, . )~~~~;~~'l::~::.'i<~;:.;:~~:<:,: ; : . :'::,' <' -" :;f}h'J \~ ~..~?i.f..:1H".r\i ',i ~ t." I " ",~):,:f:;"w.~8;~~~{;\~r\':~:,;:.':/,:';';:: ,:" :''';' ":'::,;"".. ;..... '. J.~f.J.:.~:~;!~~{:t~~i~:ti;l:~\f":I~,:)t~.': :~~11 " '('. " < : . ~ I ~~~~\;irr;',,>':> .,,; ',,' " '.:,' ., : . . r' I' ' '<:': ,":' >', "}', , , SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT " Key Map Proposal # 4 69 c Figure 47. Site plan for South Myrtle AVe. and Lakeview Rd. landscape and mixed.use project This proposal occurs at intersection of S. Myrtle Ave. and Lakeview Rd. and its immediate vicinity. The cemetery receives some badly needed roadside landscaping and buffering from neighboring land uses. A well landscaped mixed.use complex is designed for the vacant property which rons along the nonhero edge of Lake view Rd. The result of these improvements is the creation of an inviting gateway into the S. Myrtle Ave. commercial corridor. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 70 ~~~~~~l';, '., .... ~~.....~,.,.;:~. '" ~~I'''<::\I1~~t.:.~;:t\:~_,~"",~~ '\ ~~"'f4l"~...fJJ-...h."" ;;).....I~";...... ~~........:~..~~........!l~:-~i..~ . . :~~.~~...(... ........:: -. +~i'~'-:"'''''''.' -'c." .:.....:;.:......~\."";-_........,:. li.(.. 4 ~ '...-, .....:'r:-. J.. ....,.... }__ _.. .... . _ .....~ '"':;-....-., _J... ~ "+ ..'r..... :0-...... ....... "",,' ~,.. '. _. T . . ..,L ........~.'..!"'. ~:~..,-.;: .:~. ". - .~~~-='.:'.~:.-===-.. -. '-. Figure 48. Intersection of Lake view Rd. and S. Myrtle Ave. Figure 49. Landscape improvements at the intersection of Lake view Rd. and S. Myrtle Ave. intersection FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 71 o o ........ 2' o W\ i i s ~ Key Map Figure SO. Site plan of potential inti)) developments at intersection Turner St. and South Fort Hanison AVe. Proposal ## 5 This proposal focuses on the redevelopment of several isolated vacant lots on S. Ft. Harrison. The infiJJ projects are designed as mixed- use structures with commercial retail or office on the ground floor and residential apartments above. The establishment of continuity in architectural character and uniform strcetscaping aids in the creation of a readily identifiable community image. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNIn' DESIGN + RESEARCH . I SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 72 Figure 51. Existing conditions on South Fort Harrison Avenue Figure 52. South Fort Harrison Ave. mixed-use infill developments FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNJ1Y DESIGN + RESEARCH " SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 73 / Key Map Proposal # 6 g Figure 53. Site plan of large mixed-use development on South Fon Hamson The site for this proposal is an 1.5 acre vacant block between Pine St. and Druid Rd. The mixed-use project features high end retail, a street side cafe, and a fme restaurant with interior courtyard at street level with large spacious residential units at the subsequent levels. Wrapped by a continuous arcade and overlooking balconies this multi-faceted complex is notable for its pronounced architectural style which beckons to the local vernacular. It establishes a strong design precedent for future development to emulate. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ~_~..___u.c__~_~_. r SOUTH FORT HARRlSON STUDY REPORT - 74 ~- : ~~~! ~ .'-~.-:' . ~, -'''-''''''' _... .... ~ ~- ;..:4 .-- Figure 54. Existing vacant site for proposed mixed-use development on S. Ft. Harrison Ave. ~ Figure 55. Mixed-use development complex. on South Fort Harrison Ave. . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH soum FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 75 r \ \ I / Key Map Proposal 1# 7 (b o Q Figure 56. Site plan for rowhouse development proposed for Pine Street This proposal places a much needed rowhouse community on a 3.5 acre vacant land parcel located at the dead end of Pine St. The community is connected by a through street to Druid St. and Turner St. The PineUas Trail runs parallel to the proposed neighborhood providing a local pestrian amenity as well as a buffer to the CSX tracks to the east. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ., SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 76 . "" . :" . ~ .' ". ., .....~.. . ... - .: :!':.-. .'.~ ."", . . . '. Figure 57. Dead-end condition at Pine Street Figure 58. Pine Street rowhouse neighborhood development FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH - . ~ ::' ,1 :1 soum FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 77 Project Summary and Recommendations .;., . Study area zoning proposals designed to respond to future market and land use demands imposed by evolving neighboring districts (Morton Plant Hospital Bnd Clemwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan) , , , . Compatibility of mixed uses in proposed flexible zoning districts ensured through enforced confonnity to design specifications (architectural streetscapingt landscaping. buffering, etc.) . ' Enhance community attractiveness to high quality growth (industrial. high tech, commercial, residential) . Increased pedestrian and vehicular accessibility through improved surface infrastructure (Pine lias Trail, improved sidewalk network, elimination of dead end streets, address drainage issues, etc.) a Revival of residential development . Pinellas Trail functions as community focal point and catalyst for development .. Land uSe intensity increased (taX revenue benefits) . " Emphasis placed on developing community character and identity . Good ~eighbOr to surrounding communities , ~: . . , , . ,. . ',' ,I '. . ~: , , " ~ '. .. /:..c . '\.. :. .; " {If' . , i;, " . ,.1. -.Ii. 'J .r. ; ,. '.: \, '1;''" . '.' ~.;J /; . ': :(<'.,: I:::;' . .~ :. I' ::L' i .f',. '. '., .,. I . ~', . I . ., ,.: .. " '.' FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ',',' < ." 1I~;.u:;:;.u...",:",--"~-,,:' "._~"""'''''.''''''-'''L+~',.. , ....."'...'..-,.~ .~..n -,~- ~ ..."-&.,,..........~, ~.....j-~..... .._. .1 Ie ,.................' ':..,.1 ~ "'~~ SOUTH FORT HARRISON STIJDY REPORT Appendix I Demographics Study Area Ch.raderistics Persons In Study Area 270 19 32 Total Persons Under 18 and OVer 65 in Study Area ~..-.....~ f.~~j:""a'1€;~ rr~18rpim:e · ,- ~~rS(jri'i.1Jnd~ 1i1:61i~~We-r.~ ~u...:.. .;~. ~ 'r. .. 6'::-:l .. J: If} .-::t'llm;;~_ e-..-.':::..rr...'tl~ ,'. ci~~~~j~; ~...... ...~~~,{~...~ ~~;~19%'~~ ~..r. ~IM::I. 51 Soorce: 1990 Census of Population and Houslng PERSONS SurrouDdiD~ Blocks Cbaracteristics Persons In Surrounding Blocks 13.101 oIiI...IL~ -....uz-_~7C-it...-:"'~ ~~ntitf.rS Persons Under t I?"~~~tf~''"' 18 In ~.ffi SurroundIng ~''''-~~l--::''' zr.a ~~._.- --..l.....~ ~p'rrn.unu nft - " Blocks '=-~~\ll"'n~~~ ~.~~~~ ~V7'""'""'''''' ..;- 2.077 b~6%~ ~.~~,~ 4.262 Total Persons Under 18 and Over 65 In SUTTCundlng Blocks --.- -"., "'rk.~""'~ ~i".z.\~i= - ......,.~. ~1;-POi'Ceht:ot= J,: -"-."i-:!!:-'-'-!- .I - -p,erBOn$.Undet;i ~ .'i''':'::'''''''~~''''~ J~If'~~~M~!to~ U~ ~-9.m:!Urft1~ ~""""'B""I~~!r:t~;;. .. .':..1,:, 0QUi ._1.~N- ...... ..... _- -' r =.'i:.:"" ~{'.... L.... \':.X~~a. '.o.>r:,?,,:J._ , E-......-.. _...;.;o!...._r.~'T....ii:i ~J""'I'O~r~~-" _J.'II......~:-r: 78 elly of Cleanvater Cbarac:teristlc:s Persons In Clearwater 98.602 . ~ ...-u...."j~ ~~~"t'1i11 .:;P.en:em of- Persons Under I~~[ii~i~r; 181n clearwater~~&.71!'~fJ . ~Glea"rwate - tt~~~ '!..~:>:_-~ 17,287 _~~ ~~~~~~ ~P6g4 Persons over 65ij:~~~~~ In Clearwater ~;;:;;.e5'Jn... .:it~ ~--..: "-..}-<"..... ",.. . ~ Clearwater; ~~~i.'U:"" ~ _~:. ~+~1k~ 25.257 ~W.1i1:t' Tolal Persons Under 18 and Over 65 In Clearwater <" ''''. o...:;:r..J~t"~~i..a-' ~.(:...~~t'::~~~ tL.~~Percent7)frr ~u---:.. ..-r .. ..'-.- ~ Persons' 'Under, Ej~-~nd:~~i~~l ~!n.9_~~~~rfr ;l:;:;;j~~;~~~~:~ ~~ 6.339 42.544 ~ ~~~,..: ;43a1"!.t:i3';-~ ru-;:~. -,. -,~'. FLORIDA CENTER FOR. COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH . ' ICe' i' I SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT Stud)' Area Characttmtles Housing Units In Study Area , 104 ..~~----~'- Total One Unit ~~i~ Detached or ;::Untt Deij~ ~"L;,~ Attached I~: ~j"-~_'.~ Struc::tures In ia~"lrix:WR;ifil~ Study Area 'l'~~ 10 ~~-G:'~' ~ Total Housing ~.Q~ Units with 10 or~~ more Uni2a in ~iIlb1lit""~ structure in ~~~ Study Are. ~~iuav~=" ~~~ :~~1'" '""' S"r.:r--...-,r; 1.....-;: o ...;.,<'..... HOUSING UNITS SUlTOundlnl: Blocks Cbanacttristlcs Housing Units In Surrounding Blocks 6,937 3,004 ~~peroent,o '. Total Housing ~ '~'~rOi"':~~;' . ,. ous'""" un Units with 1U or .r~~-a~ ~ more Units In' '~liT"rl::.;;.- Structure in . ~o.ctu--':'~~- ----::....uu I'I'i:lnl' Surrounding ll?-.... ...;:"'"'~~ 'iSunoUndfflgw Blocks -......,....~..w......*... . ~ hB1Oc:ki.~ 2,332 ~%.~ 79 City orClearowater Characferistlcs HousIng Units in Clearwater One Unit Detached or Attached Structures In Clearwater 24.511 53768 ~..~. Total :.'!!~P.ercen .0[' Structures with iiii~~U"I:'" ~ ~ .-b~'"':"":JIF-r- 10 or more ~~.j~~.?';" Units In ~~>>~:!'1~ Structure In "~IJI.IriJ.':" .lI ~ ...;::: ::::1. "~."a'''' Clearwater ~CIeilrwa ...:.. ;t.. ~"":~~'"*':.~.t:.t;; 14.971 .:!28..., FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH cl ""---- - ~~ Ie SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 80 Study Area Cbaracteristics "s:<*'.:r}'$:~ .~ Ii~f.~ Total Occupied H&mi~1Jfilti: Housing Units In j ~cf~'~~~~: ~:f8: Study A-a '~$H1L_ ' 1"\1.:11 - :stu~rAre3~ ~~ !r7~...~ .?:~.:t.~ 93 ~.f~~~~ ~Pe-~=6f;21 Total Owner ~"i . -:..._~....~ i.'f,;:r.OWrifJ~ -. Occupied it;::.;"~~~~ Housing Units In~'~~~u' '~arr~Iri'" S d Are ,Olhwng. n.IoOt, tu y a ...:"''lJr~'''' ........ ~!![i:.~ _.'--~~. 29 64 ~,;;-.....6 .........ilh. ~. " -.. .. -'~I !t;'p~.~i1t~~ Persons In S..~",.. :r~,a.u"':'I'-f - .....-~ l'7el'8oos' . Occupied ~~...,.. '-~"" ''''''". ~ ...,. OCciJplecl;i: Housing Units IniH.... u' I '. U Its'" . !.osngn Study Area -,!~:'shidy;~N@ ~~~~ .:..; ..t.t-7:~~;-;~ 183 ,-;-:,'~~aB%,';';'.:~ ........_-1 OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS Surrounding Blocks Cba racteristic5 ~",*p.ercint Ofl'"" ~ Total OccupIed ;J[,!;.;,....... :;..~~ . \$. ou~\ng Un _? Housing Units Ini~b-:-" _.e ledf"'- Surrounding "'I.i,_.~IL...._l)fb 'lJ""il~' ~'dl"'I'- Blocks ..=.:::J rrounolng;<: .; --&18i~~.' '!"~..st~:""~'..f":1-...i..C.i:~..~...... 5,992 ~~1ti~ 2,768 I.rFPereent of~'" Persons In ji:!! '"'"Hi.' -.-" ;!o: O led 1,:::.l?e~ons.rn7.~ ccup ~~"=~""l""";';;'" r .>-0' Occup ea..n_ HousIng Units In '....:: .,' '. " _.\-=:.~ c: . tHouslng Un~ I", ...urroundmg ~J?4rtOU~.d1i1(i:~~ Blocks r,';f'~::"BroCks.;'::. ~~...... _ ......_~~...r- ~~.901l,..,,-.~;~ . -'4 n~,~" City of Clearwater Cbaracteristlcs f~"--' ".;~ti. Total Occupied ~':i.~~t..-~~ i:t ou_IOQ...lJnit$ HousIng Units In~.\.Obane(i'i'\ City of II-'~-'''' .- ~or~ Clearwater . "l~W't8 w. . 'r..J~~~--.f~ 44,076 ~~8~~ ~tJa,'HJ Total Owner ~..i; ":.i"'il' ~J~~ H O~~edtts 1 ~.~ ous ng n n~otj8iij;Un~ Clearwater rf~i:ieii~te~ I .....~~.'~~ 27,210 ~6 w~~.u . ,- ...~_.. ., '<.iil ~erceni~ Total Renter ~~",;-~,""'''.,~eF- !.~Remer:~~~ Occupied :'"",-<-::'-'1" 't~;"':' 'C.. - ~ It:U It-..= Housing Units in~~~-;, E'HOUSlng Unlts~ Clearwater f;;:jnCiear\Wtei-~ L..'l"'~~"_".T'~~' _ 1:- ~""';...I:." . ~o&I:~ ~lr~g-,.":~-..~ - .....;.,1....w 16,865 it . "'f-. 'ft.'!"percont or:;-:irl Persons In ..0... :p" . . T 'r~ ~:::;\ -.!! eraons n"~ Occupied 'i',;_. "',' .:. 1..f.4f ~;~~ OcCupled:~ Housing Units int.-;. ..... '.;'" City of ~~.Ff' ~clng 9of~~] CI t ~.,,_. n lfu -.AI earwa er ..-:"""""~.-... ,~.~. .~- '': tl..::' g,I~~~r;:;J ~""9~~-'" t'_:;;.~~.._: I , ~-:tf~ ~ l.o ~...",...... 95,446 11.824 FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH I'"'-~-' ,- - , . ., --.."...." " .. . ..' ,"" " - SOUTI-I FORT HARRISON SruDY REPORT Density Comparisons Stud)' Arca Surroundinl: Blocks :r.~ff~"'~~~~""~~~":~ - ~....~ .~":1i-Tr':--~::1..U'~-~.n t-Tot.8t ~of:~Surrou .)s':'-~~~l!'''''''-' ,~- ..'.." . " =~';~~J-..It~"R.li:ICKS~' .- . ~r'fW;7i:~c~. __ ~ ~~~~~~~t~ . ~ .....--:-'.....;,~-.I --=~~"T~.F...:.... ~~~~.t-if:~-!~~r. ~~"'~ ~ .~l15'~ ~"'1."'~=c ~~4~-..~ $P;\le"':-'''~,-:N., D .. ....rug....... .,..I~..JI-...,..-y.. ~ ~Untts' -hACrBJtiS~'~ . . . ,J?!.......-,.~ ~~..!>>. ......-.: -~~.1CI1~' .t!'_.,.~ ~... .7r ~~~.w UI&AII'\D~ b-n~~r;. - ~...~. .~":~,.;...~.~~~B'l.. ....~ .r..~..-..l..~~;:......~~~lU.T.a J-...=!..;,~.~~~i~~~.-~~~ ~.ir~:t-:$.;.r. ..~~':::.i ..... ~ ~._n:.,~.,.t;._. vu;~a ~..~~~~. ~~T ..~2~ :- ~l~~~'~~. 7..~~~. :-,4.!...;~i,~~~'.=.~~~l7.~ :' FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ~,. .., II.."."....... 81 CIt~' orClcanutcr ~~\ .-:.\.~r.C:.';"'; - '.';'.--_~~~:"""" ~'.:..L~ ~~'.:r'=.::...rl~,~~ I"." ~~,,,,!-,.,;--..-,,!"~...f""'~~ ~. )\verage PersonS'- . - ~""".I_- oct_... . 'I.- '-''-''~''t''';~ ....."'L ~~.,lri CItY. of C1e8rWate"-~ ~~.~-;i~:.'iil~-;;;.\.~.z_~. ~ ~:m:F .- . .~. .~..... f}~.r.- ~.Y"~.:~~:r:;:-!.~ r-! .._.-.~t".3'~I.~.~- ~-""'''...JIi..:L~ -.......,..'1'~..~L toft!_. ...~~ ~..;iZii'.....-4t=.,. ,~~~"!i,j ~~t. ~~~;;ry_..!:'...;.~~.t..u ,......,.. '.-'_l" \r. ~f/-..,.....:....I.oo~._~ ~-...__.. " - -...... "'L.....tv....""l..... I-~l!.~ l'~~ .HciusfrijUnlts'~~'f ~ AaiJn.CIty- . o;.CJUrWate}~ .~. "-,~,-" . . ...,....,."''''''' ~.=;~.?.:~~_ D'~~al t"':;?~'~~~ji~-- ~ ~~tri-M"€:~S;.:;rr...:.:rt. or-- _ ':" L ~~J.t"~~~:~'=..~~~:i::~~P :t'~ .t.,J........i~...r.:....~.~"'.,. T ~~.~~~%~r:; :-;; . U:':"-i-r _;"",T_' 'I~' _.""'!:T.L~ T" ._ f1iwrage'oe:cupied HOUlll\gi ~ Units per Aa'e'ln~lty:of~ f:L :.' ., ~ 'C' .t;;:-"'K~-t...-"!:~!~ .;;- -. 7? _' IUQI..,.....r. ii' t?1' ":'j:' ,.::,~~~~'''=;l':'. '.~~~"~ ~':~'f'~Jik.~~~ "M- . _U'_ __""U=_....."._..~ ~~L..~~::~~~.~.:;.~~~;.'-1.~~ !lli.i~ ;~.,.-.l\.r.~:~~~.:...~ .:-i.\-t;jj SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 82 Appendix II Survey Questionnaires Background Infonnation 1) Do you live in or near the study area? y N (Circle one) If SOt for how long? Years? Months? " Where? Own? Rent? (Circle one) 2) How many people in each age group live in your home? 18 and under 18-30 31-44 45-64 65 and above 3) Do you work in the study area? Y N (Circle one) Where? Employer? , .", How long employed? Years? Months 4) Do you own property in the study area? y N (Circle one) ." Where? Use? How many years owned? 5) Do you own a business in the study area? Y N Where? , Type? . How many years owned? FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ~c.tl...,-~_n;_,::-,',,~.j(a,s........~,"!~; ;.-.,..,...........-~... ."< .. ..,. ""'- ...,...... , SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 83 ~ Zoning and Land Use 6) Looking at the accompanying zoning map, where do you feel the current zoning appropriately responds to land use needs for the South Fort Harrison area? Please explain your answer. 7) In what areas of the South Fort Harrison area do you feel that existing zoning is not appropriate? Why or why not? 8) What adjustments to the CUlTent zoning plan would you recommend for the South Fort Harrison area? '. , 9) What is your opinion of the current land use occuning in the South Fort Harrison area? FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH i. I. .";.."..'.<.<,,.. "We., ~."., ,.,,- .-' . '~/ .:.:; \ ' >, I'" '1'. sourn FORT HARRlSON STUDY REPORT 84 ]0) Which land use types do you perceive to be the most beneficial (economically, socially, aesthetically) to the area of study? Please explain. ) 1) Which land use is least beneficial to the area? Explain. 12) How do you perceive the evolution of the South Fon Harrison area over time? 13) What changes concerning zoning and/or land use would you like to see in order to achieve the best use of the South Fort Harrison area in the future? FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNrIT DESIGN + RESEARCH .a"~~~~\'~&l)'~,",'iD~;"''':''''''I.,.-", ,.~...'~.' ,...' .....~, ~. , , ...~ . ~..... - .. . " ,. ..... . Ie . ~ ... _. ~ , . '", . ~ . .' ~ . ~ , , I"> . . soum FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 85 14) What activities or conditions occurring in the adjacent areas do you feel has the potential to significantly affect the South tort Harrison urc~7 15) In your opinion, will these events have a positive or negative affect on the study area? Please explain. . Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic 16) If you work in the study area, how long is your commute in minutes? 17) What mode of transportation do you primarily utilize? 18) Generally, what is your opinion of the traffic conditions in the study area? FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH SOUTI-I FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT , . 19) More specifically, how do you rate the following streets? South Fort Harrison Ave. (Alt 19) Chestnut/Court St. South Myrtle Ave. Lakeview Rd. Other specific streets or intersections? :' , ., 20) What recommendations do you have for improving traffic conditions in the study area? 21) The Pinellas Trail will be extended through the study area (see map) and has the potential to function not only as a recreational amenity, but also as a neighborhood link. Arc you in favor of the Pinellas Trail coming through this district? Y N I Why or why not? " FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH . .., , , . '. ~.c'.. ~. . +. . 86 . . " .- soum FORT HARRISON STIJOY REPORT 87 . 22) What types of features or activities would you like to see along the Pinellas Trail in the South Fort Harrison area? 23) Where along the Trail is a likely place to locate these activities? , ' , 24) Do you see a need for additional open green space in the study area? If so, where? " . 25) Are there places in the study area that would benefit from improved streetscaping or landscape buffers? Y N If so, where are they located? . ' "::: . 26) Are current sidewalk conditions adequate? Y N FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH I ;...~ ','", a: . :.~.',. ':.~~~1., ~~.hll-" 'I ~++."""'.r_ ...... ,......,:: ."."? . .~, : ~, . " -< " , . :, ", .'. -, sourn FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT Where arc conditions inadequate? 27) Do you use the public transit system? Y N How often? 28) Are transit stops and routes convenient and/or appropriately placed? Y N Ifnot, what changes would you recommend? Crime 29) Are there any specific troubled crime areas in or near the study area? If so. where arc they located? What types of crimes dominate these areas? 30) What factors contribute to these troubled areas? 88 t I' i . FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN of. RESEARCH . y. , . I;'. ; .,' I '\.~ , , ,..,. L~ , !'~ . '.1' .' ' , '. .: ~ ~.r 'c . l,," " t{.". -'. l . ;'. . . , . , .' :. . ( '-l < ~: . :~''- ",' . ~ '. \ ., " . ~;y ~::r\ .:'. t ',,0" .;;., :.('. : ,'-'<1. c,:' ,.. I,.. soum FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 89 3 J) What influence have Neighborhood Crime Watch groups had on crime'in the South Fort Harrison area? 32) What physical improvements would be desirable to assist in discouraging criminal behavior (i.e. improved lighting, landscaping, sidewalks, elimination of dead-end streets, ctc.)? FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ~ ~J.::..~i(b..r~1)~';'~H~~~~/;;;"~; _..~....,........,...- ---__4 ~1.',... _, , .'_"'" '....._ . . .~;..c ". .~_~ _I. ~.~.U'.~r .......",.' ,'Q~~""T"..?""~'_ ...... SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 90 " -. Bibliography Agency, C. C. R. (1995). Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan (Report). Clearwater. Andrew, C. I., & Merriam, D. H. (1988). Defensible Linkage. Journal of the American Planning Association(Spring), 199-205. Audirac, I., Shennyen, A. H., & Smith, M. T. (1990). Ideal Urban Fonn and Visions of the Good Life: Florida's Growth Management Dilemma. Journal of the American Planning Association(Autumn), 470~ 491. Barnett, J. (1995). The Fractured Metrooolis: Imoroving the New City. Restoring the Old Citx. ReshsDine: the Ree:ion. (1 cd.). New York. N.Y.: HarperCoUins. Bollens, S. A. (1990). Constituencies for Limitation and Regionalism: Approaches to Growth Management. Urban Affairs Ouarterlv. 26(1),46-47. Brower, D. J., & Carol. D. S. (Eels.). (1987). Manag.ing Land Use Conflicts: Case Studies in Seecial Area Manallement. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Chapman, J. I. (1988). Land Use Planning and the Local Budget: A Model of their Interrelationships. Public Administration Review(July/August), 800-806. City of Clearwater, F. (1992). Land Development and Buildin2 and Development Regulations. Tallahassee: Municipal Code Corporation. Clearwater, C. o. (1994). Zoning Atlas: City of Clearwater . Clearwater, Florida: City of Clearwater. Cooper, F. (1990). A Community Problem Solving Toolbox: Seven Principles and Some Examples. Public Manngement(October), 20-22. Department, P. C. E. (1995). Plans of Proposed Pinellas Recreational Trail from Belleview Boulevard to Jones Street (pp. 28). Cleanvater, Florida: Pinellas County Engineering Department. Department, P. C. P. (1995).1995 Guide to the Pinellas Trail (6 ed., pp. 37). Clearwater, Florida: Pinellas County Planning Department. Development, C. o. C. D. o. P. a. (1989). City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan: Goals. Obiectives and Policies. Clearwater. Deyo, T. (1991). Employer-Assisted Housing: Strategies for Revitalizing Communities. Journal of Housing(September/October),227-236. Diamond, H. L., & Noonan, P. F. (1996). Land Use in America: The Report of the Sustainable Land Use Proiect. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH ;'';'':~~.;':'>'::-;''.~E';1~lP.~t;.. ...J."""-.l. t-' ..'. ~>... - I' SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 91 Fainstcin, S. S., Fainstcin, N.L, Hill, R. C., Judd, D. R., & Smith, M. P. (1986). RestrUcturing. the City: The Political Economv of Urban Redevelooment. (Revised cd.). White Plains, N.Y.: Longman, Inc. Gakenhcimer, R. (1993). Land Useffransponation Planning: New Possibilities for Developing and Developed Countries. Transnortation Ouarterly. 47(2),311-322. Gore, T., & Nicholson, D. (1991). Models of the Land Development Process: A Critical Revjew. Environment and PlanninlZ. 2~, 705-730. . Langdon, P. (1995). The Urbanist's Reward. Professional Architecture(August), 82-89. Lenz, T. J. (J988). Neighborhood Development: Issues and Models. Social PoJicv(Spring}, 24-30. Leven, C. (1991). Distance, Space and the Organization of Urban Life. Urban Studies. 28(3}, 319-325. Nebraska, C. o. L. (1995). Comprehensive Develooment Plan 1995. Bennett, Nebraska. Nelson, A. C. (1992). Elements of Effective State Land Use Planning Policy. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 118(3),97-105. Nelson, A. C. (1992). Estimating Functional Population for Facility Planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 118(2), 45-64. Nicke~, D. R. (1995). The Progressive City? Urban Redevelopment in Minneapolis. Urban Affairs Review. 3Q(3), 355-377. Opalski, D. V. (1992). Jobs, Housing, Transportation: A Balance Through Medjated Fair Shares. Journal of Housim'.!(NovemberlDecember). 290-300. Peirce, N. R. (1994). A New Way to Bring Home the Bacon. National Journal(October), 2359. Pisano, M. (1995). Federal Policy and Community Involvement: Responding to National Economic and Social Trends. National Civic Review(Winter), 30-36. Research, F. C. f. C. D. (1995). North/South Greenwood Residentiallnfill Study . Clearwater: University of South Florida. Robertson, K. A. (1995). Downtown Redevelopment Strategies in the United States: An End-of-the- Century Assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association. Sawicki, D. S.. & Patrice, F. (1996). Neighborhood Indicators: A Review of the Literature and an Assessment of Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Journal of the American Planning Association. 62(2), 165-183. Smallwood, C. (1993). A Matter of Pride. American CitY and CountY (February), 47~Sl. Smart, E. (J98S). Making Infill Proiects Work. Washington. D.C.: Urban Land Institute. FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH , " .. ;'i, . ., :~. ~', '".-.:. ::,.r.;: . ~ . : ~. .,....; ).... ". Ii. '. ~ " , I' >~:.;/ ' :!, -: ~~ : . I" " '.~ I ,. . ! ~ oJ> ! '. :~:~'l ,. .>~:'.,\F . ~,' , ," , . \,~ . t'" .... '. . .. . . - " . " ' . ~;.;! . . , ~. . , r ..1." c' .',1' '.' ~'" . ". . .'" ., ~ ~. ..". - SOUTH FORT HARRISON STUDY REPORT 92 Transportation, F. D. (1995). Tentative Five-Year Work Prolfram: Working. Together for TransDo(tation (Report). TaUahllSsee, Florida: Florida Department of Trans po nation. Wegener, M. (1994). Operational Urban Models: State of the Art. Journal of the American Planning Association. 60(1), 17-21. Whelan, J. (1994). Assessing Urban Planning Schemes by means ofMuJti-criteria Evaluation Techniques: The Case ofPedestrianisation. Urban Studies. 3 I (2),309-328. Widner, R. C. (1994). Planning Law Primer: UnderStanding Spot Zoning. Planing. Commissioners Joumal(13). " Wyatt, M. (1993). A Critical View orLand Value Taxation as a Progressive Strategy for Urban Revitalization, Rational Land Use, and Tax Relief. Review of Radical Political Economics. 26(1),-1-25. , I f. ~ I I ., ., ", '. ; . " , 1 ! i , . . /";: FLORIDA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DESIGN + RESEARCH, I ; .} .. . , r j.lf{.f.~I,~,...~....r.,'!.;.... \" r~"j~"",,,,"fr--"7"-~' . ~'r' ....--~.".,._."!"..... " ... . -. "'....~.rw w .....,.,~ ......",...., < ,d ~,-....~." . "-"'- '~I ""'(." ~ '" ..... . ."-.,'~.F,, I ' 'J),~~~ff::.:'.;' f': C ,<:' ".' , ' i i;:', <:> " .t ., c, :~t~" .:~. \:;~~:: '". . .~ . ,'~ ;'. ' / '.,' ./~. \, .' ~'1' :: , ' i r ;.~ : ~ / ..': :~::< ' ~,:~: ,f "'.,:. . , 11;' ~<', " :;;~:';.: . p," ........ .~: ':', '. ;--1 ~~:=~<~\.' . ::.: <":.' I~;:. ~', ~ l;li:'~" . ,. ....~ 'I' :) ~ :~ ~,!." t.~f;:i.: ': ,:: . ~..~ ~ , ~',' J ~' . ; j,;t:, . .: ":~, ~~!i'~:::' ~\:;;, .'; , t:J' .' : , 'f.{;~~';: :":'. ' ~y~~: ,:/:' . '. ~ ' ~"~; 't, ~' ;~'(..' . ~~r~~,~' ~~' ~ ::,":-:,,:. .....' . ~.... ~<: ':: 'J. :~,\ J.1I' ;><:,~., , " ~<" ?~ji.;,'.1. , ~*~~::~;:.','., .'J., )~):'~:,~ ' . :"~~ , ,~\~i ':1: ';, ~ '. f '. C . ~."~':,:.\ :', ',", .,' ~,. > \:::' . 'F:','.'.' ',:} .!~!.~' . bj.~':..: },':. \' ~1"~\ ~., ,JJt::;:,\,:".-:, ~;)\\"!':; :. ~ ",' . .~ ,....,;..:, t:J~~'!": 'JU , :"' ~':.' ;;"~''''''': I': '~, C "~I" :~ . . l. '.' ,} . '.;j d .', '.' " , .. ""~ .,'" ,. ',. ' C,' " ~ Item # 23 , . : !61Y '.' +": . , . , , " ~ . -1 ~ i I' j. . . .. +'t....' '.' :23 CITY 01' CLEARWATER INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDBNCB TOI Elizabeth M. Deptula, city Manager Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk William C. Held, Jr., Harbormaster (j)ttr .ROHI '. . COPIES a File SUBJECT: Marina Business Plan Moved +0 . ? 9~ l'1~qG Pla~or the meeting of August 15, .:;.~ DATBI August 2, 1996 Attached .~ coJf!es of the Marina Business presentation to the City commission on the 1996. "I'~ :. "'..' :.' ~ . ~ :.' ~: . .- :1' 'The proposed business plan has been reviewed and supported by the Marine Advisory Board and the Fiscal Review Committee. Please call me if you have any questions or need more information. I' ,OJ, . ,', .;J n: i.',1 '~.l . i ~ . \:,.' , : ~ ..'. to' .~, 'I '. . " . ,', .y i '. ", . '~. ~< . . ~. ~ (.' .' +~. , . . . " .... ~ r ' ':.'. ( '.:,' I, . ~ :. . . '. . . , : " ~ .~.., .;.. ' , . >' . . e.... 'r". ~ ~ ...." . ~3 Notes for Mayor and Commissioners on Marina Business Plan - Consumer Price Index (CPI) Wetll use National Consumer Price Index for past twelve (12) months. Current CPt is between 2.5% and 3.0%. ..... < - Boat slip waiting list has 93 names. 76 are non-residents and 24 are residents. Commercial slip tenants are 50% resident and, 50% non- resident. .,~ ~ . . . I' ., . I. .. ~ '/'. . . ~" ,'" - Private slip tenants are 59% resident and 41 % non-resident. ; 1" . ,.,' e. ~:." >.,., '. . : J. - Boat srips 51. commerCial 84 private 7 fuel dock slips .24 transient 44 Island Estates . . .~"I: .... : , ~\/f .. : ,,' .,...: , , ~?~ t ~ ;:~'. ,0.. . '. . ~'." : . 210 Total slips I~~:,;' . '.j' ie; :~ ., . \~ . .:. Spread between resident and non-resident is a surcharge. ,.'( e::~ e ~ e.'. ; ,~, >, ;. ~ ,I ..'~ ';i'o , . '..:,. ; . .C',. '. .:"...'... ;~:\:<.~:. . ~ . -, . .~. .... . :. ,. . ...1. .\ ;>.:. ' .r.:. ~: , ' . . . " .,,~: ;.' ,. )"11 '<~ I". ~ . ' d3 C I T Y 0 F C LEA R W ATE R INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: Mayor and City commissioners FROM: William C. Held, Jr., Harbormaster COPIES: Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager Cyndie Goudeau, city Clerk SUBJECT: Marina Slip Rent Information . DATE: August 13, 1996 '.' This memo is sent to provide you with additional information on the proposed Marina slip'rent increase. For FY95/96, total projected Marina slip rent revenue was $505,000. Breakdown of the total is: Commercial = $192,720, Private = $201,978 and Transient = $110,302. Total projected Marina slip rent revenues, with all recommended increases in FY96/97, is $596,670. Breakdown of the total is: commercial = $254,757, Private = $217,918 and Transient ~ $123,995. . ., ..< .:'", In FY96/97, total projection for all Marina revenues is $1,954,495 and total projection for all Marina expenditures is $1,935,910, for a difference of $18,585. With no slip rent increase in FY96/97, the Marina will have a projected short fall of $73,085. We have not analyzed which program(s) would need to be amended to make up the short fall. Marina commercial tenants are charged slip rent based on the amount of passengers their vessel can carry. This method of Charging commercial tenant slip rent was established on November 1, 1993. Attached is the break-down on Marina commercial tenant slip rent. Approval of the Marina Business Plan by the city Commission will still require a resolution for the slip rent increase and an ordinance change authorizing the city Manager to approve slip rent increases up to ten percent. If the business plan is approved, the resolution and ordinance change will be scheduled far the city commission meeting an September 5, 1996. I hope this information is helpful. Please call me at 6954 if you have any questions. "' . MARINA COMMERCIAL SLIP RENT INFORMATION ~essels carrying 161 passengers and over v Vessel . Length Passengers Majesty 100 300 Resident current Proposed Increase R 720 1,000 280 i Pirate Sea s. Show Q. Super Q~ 55 73 65 82 ~essels carrying 149 152 149 150 101 to R R R R 160 passenqers 440 700 440 700 440 700 440 700 260 260 260 260 .~ I, . I.. ; ,.. - , , *:: '. . " , ' " . .;, ' :: .. 'c ~, " .' ~!: ' ,.1 " Ir:; . :r' ! . ~. \', I i '~. , . ".~': ; . ~ : :~ 0, I {3:' I' ,; :. '" ,:. c' . ;'. " i~ . . I\} ",J I~' ~',' d 1;<;.... . > "..' . , . Ii ";,:: '. .U',' ' ,';. . '.:;: ~ : ~:r , .... c ~ " i.... '.: ' I'!,:'" . ' ,:};<. . ." : ~',: ~ I :ca. ,,' , I' !."< ," . ': ': '. C,',:, 'f." .' ..:"rOj 'r :,' >c. ~~, . i , >" ; ....'~:' : I" : '.~ :' ; , : \:~. ... '. , 1-',,;,"':' . 'z ..':" '. , ' '. .., "'0 ,) i -+. I,'" . -1; ~ :" " 0 .. /~, . \ ' } : '., c",,'. i'~ Page 2 (r~. Marina Commercial Slip Rent Information Vessels carrying 6 passengers (continued) Phantom. 35 6 NR 230 260 30 Fantasea 37 6 R 200 225 25 S.. star 34. 6 R 200 .225 25 GulfS.. 37 6 NR 230 260 30 Flo-Jo 40 6 NR 230 260 30 Snoopy 36 6 NR 230 260 30 Tom Cat 38 6 R 200 225 25 Gypsy 34 6 NR 230 260 30 ,Daisy M.. 43 6 NR 230 260 30 Marg.. D.. 35 6 R 200 225 25 . 86 Proof ,43 6 R 200 225 25 DoU.. H.' 36 6 .R 200 225 25 Valkyrie '34 6 R 200 225 25 P. Donna 36 6 NR 230 260 30 S. Zone 25 6 NR 230 260 30 Vessels carrying 4 passenqers B. Line 25 4 NR 195 225 30 A. Aver.. 25 4 NR 195 225 30 Special' Purpose parasail Fly-n-Time . 28 6 NR 290 575 285 Sky .Se. . 6' R 250 500 250 Joy Rider 28 . 6 NR 290 575 285 , ) . ' )' .1 . . ..-1_1" .(' '!, ; " ,.' . , : ;; ~ ; '~ ,. . ," , 't ~-.'. . : ::t.;~. c ~;. . , " \ . " , ',r~ c.' : " . J~;)"' ': <' . . ,'" ....I~ ' ~~ ....'~ .:,'1. " . : '.:~~ , . f"; , . " , ~I~ . ", ~ . .'1, ~ I. . '. . :. i;', : t,..:.. . . ~ '(. :' " ; ,t, :. .' .~ \ ~ j;' ,. :;',' " "~'C .f , ...'. . -, \ '.' . l. " ca ..e: t::. cu :ie, .......c: . eu CtJ .~a: (.) ....... CI) . e: tI) .=:3 CD .~ .t: -== ...... ; ~ ~ED ..~ ca (J) o ~. I, ...: --S -ti' ....... '(1) ::r: 'II o e I!!! ~ ~ ~ !. i \ .... Q) 'I-It CI) ca e o -e ~ . ( ~ ! CD 0) 0) ~ ~ :::s ~ . i I I I i i 1', , I I : T .... " :G~~' ,; 'r~""l~>;'-""" . ~ ,.~!:'I:~'~)~~:~,~'_. ~~;',- . ":~;: ':7:~..:t...4__ ('_I... . .. . ~.....lo! .~... .r~'/ 1....~_...4-". .~ , ~ +J.E ; 0 gsm .- en ~ :; Cb c :E >.- .5 en (1) In ::s .c~.c ...., .- "C .......c o.scu l3'Cben .- ::s cu >-c +:; C\'S 1_ (.) > ... cu....cu cnCbE c~... "U ~ ~ ::ss;;;.... "C...o o 1- .c ...J!...., Q. I r:;: Cb en ,. ::s ~ (1) c .- > 4)Cb:t:; >(J+:; ~~& cu~E tJJ .e:; 0 ca CD (.) n:s.crn c ...., .- .- .... n:s = cu c "of .c ._ e....:; c;2!e c,:3 .- en CD .~ ' c fi c .- ::s-c1Q EC.c ca.... Cb....Cb .cc", ....Q)::s cEil) · 1- C ~ S 1::'- ;;: ccaoftS .- Q. CI) (1) RSGJ-.c :io<(...., ~ . '. , ~ w > - I- o W .., m o ~ ~ c: e .9- ....... CI) ....... c:: .Q) ;; t: e 't-I ~ ~ c: o e b c: Cts 'tJ c:~ e~ ~~ CI) .... "-~ o ...... ~ Cts J!j.~ c: Q) ::s CI) o "' u e .!!! CJ QS . . . ~ ~ e u .5 ...... c: e .S- e;) :::: c:( . . Q) ....: (.) r:: as Q) ~e Q) e ~ tn.s ~ e tJ- Cd s e ~ ~ ~ tn Ll- e:: ~.S ,... Q) ,... . \..i .::: '-lei:: .Q.. 0 ~ e ~~~ ~ .~ .g (j 0 ~ ...... (I) Q).~ I b e ~ ~ fa ~ e e e Co) e...... ~ ~ 8 ~ -e cts "- e · cu S~tn~-e ~ 1: .S m ~ .~ pl -0 ::s ......::::a; Q.~ ~::s e- m .~ ~ ': 0, cu ....... ." ." u PJ ~ .5 .5 ~ -.. .... a;; a.;; :51 s.n~~~ . . fI . . ~. . c w~-:~.~~,.~,~, .... :' :' . t 1t~f:2.r~~r'~'~j""; " ' .. 3~~!i?~~;.t\,:~ ...... . '. . - CI) t/) en '(2) > ~ II) .~ .... CD en c CD t/) th ca C. CD I II) S ca et: - cu .- ~ CD E E 0 0 0 0 ex) o o CD (\) c .- ..... 00 :JlIIl:t ::sit) <(~ . ..... en ,. I.."C .e(\) ~~~ CUOtR- oS!.... .... o a.. (\)..., ""'c: ~ ~ ~ ~"*~'ii~;;\':i?) co ::I ~ ~:'~1';:~~:~/~>.1t..\,.~ o':!~\ .!! 0 ...,-" ' .' " o . , , " : .' '! " ','~"":,, -I '~.-:-"';'-.~" ";-"":'?,..,....-;:.: f;"':,' ,', " i ,', _ r t' 1: .: : ..:- :::', '..'I.. ~~..~.:., ,..,:; :'-';':>'.': ,...: ,:', .;-:::' > .:: ; ,~::. :--;, '.,::,:,;:,~. ::': ~ :,:: ~ ".':: 0N ..9!CX) D.(W') CUUl- Z (\) l:!o Q)U) · - C"') D.:U)- ..... u. l!! Q)lt) ~~ . ~ ..... u. ,~, ):'::'.....,~:.~...I.:; ::.:...':.: !:,~~'. ':.::;' :~)'.~.:)~.;:~;';.:}~~{r ~ . - ""'" (\)('1) "eN CUU} ~ ~ Om Q.CD ~'""' ::s C) , ' "~ :' ~..:,;',:' ;:' . ";:: ,,' ::.~, :.:<' :'\\:Y~:.- . ';: :::.~"'~D~;~;')..~:: ::':."i:><~'~<~i::-:': '~', ::"2i'::?' . , . I o o ~ o o N o . ~ m m m ~. ~j i i i i m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 .! ~ m} ~ ~ i ! i m ~ .~ ~~ i ~ i I ;i Iii m i:B ~ ~ I ] i t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i .~ ~m :cu!R li) Ii i a m li) {g Q) ;w ~ . :l::, 0 ~ : " ", i ' , ~" . : '~ ' I: " I "" " , ., " ' .., .. . : l .: ~ c. ~c.' . , " , ' ',' . .. '. +. ~......, ~. , .' '. I. , I I!! (I) C) C (1) .~ ! o CD ~ S ~ o ~ .... 2 j ri. - ca .- I 8 i l[ 0 0 R 0 - e ~ ~ ~ 00- ~ C l~ ! ! ! ! _::s 00 Q) c .- ! 0 U) 0 ~ C) CD Ii; ~ CiS~ to Ol C;R- ~ -IA- fRo ,(I) ~ ~ en m - ~ .0) m ID ~ .- u..D. (I;)- fRo as q- ~ CD .- ~ '"'"' t;: .s::: ... ~~, M "t"'"' 0) '"'"' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w. cu ~ ~ ~ fB m .e olJca CD ~ <e:i: ~ '"'"' 'It- fh (;I) w- w- .. .. ~ ... .. IS ~ ~ L. - ~ c c j m m m c3 3 ~ '~ ~ ... R ~ .- .c ::s D- en " w . :,' ,;' '" "::?~:\::,"~'~,>::: '...r.',;>'~,;.',:,.':;',::~'>:':, ::::~::r:~~::::;:~::,;'~::~\;.": />: Q)'t' .....(1)0 cu~ U) 0 00 Q. .. ",0.... CU...U) Un. - CD ", ", CD >, = 10 o ~ CD C) ... ca ...J I en G) .., ca ~ UJ ... 00 CU OU) N . :E ..CI). ,..J ~+ LL CU 0 It) S N .. CU or- I- ~ OJ c: .- ~O 1/)0 ::3N C) .. ::3 or- <(0 ,.J U) I() CUN > . O~ ... (!)+ eO _0 CUO D.M' ~ '; ",'- ,', '.:;i;, :;;",:, ~'"~ :' ~. ' . :," ~:;i:~{L:->:>~:'>i"~':': " cu ... 0- .r::. cu cu ~ m m~g olS 0 i: It) <tCUN' ::Efh 0 0 0 0 0 0 It) 0 It) C") ('I") N - ca .- e CI) E E o o o o o N ... S ns ~ ca OJ - U ,l :' ~:., I' "/ r.',' ';'r:' ! : I . ;,:,.}. " :' ~ ,'::. ' '.; ',' f.~ ~ ','j" :'. '. J, I. ..... ,', I~":I ';:~" '.', .~. .'o,'!",:. ' OJ U ... Q) .- 0. ,..J U. ,.... :.1.., t. '. o (:) It) .... o o o "r"" o o It) - . ,. ~~. ~ I , ' ,,;l,' " ,', .,'. .~ ~ u r:; = o , ;1 " ;',~. . ! , I, c .- . 00 ~~ ..C 0(1) CO> OC1) .. ... N'I- ~O .s~ "0 cao a.>>.... ~C i!! ~... C1) in .eel) ... CD ,- C... .- ca rnCl) ~i2 "::s 1Il:t.... It) .- 0)"0 "C ....(J) ~a. E :: e c .... .- "'S ftSC .... (J)._ .::: >. ca ...... ..cE u U.. Q) cao c:: CD th ..... C- ~ .- <t ::J (1). 0 =' C cns CI) CD - ", > Q.. '" CD en ..... ....c: tn CO'" ~ CD elf-"", ~ .e 0 ..... RI ca.... 0)' a..; E m ~ 1;) (1) ~ fa .... tn +J .:: ,..., ca en CI) ...."., e.m .g c.) CD q: c.c -~ ~ ~ U r:; = o tf'j =It: . .. . ~ =It !! · !'to. ..... U Q) .~ ~ .5 :::: .s ~ .' f: " " o ..... .ca c .- .. ca E - ttS Q.. .e:; , .- e =' E CD :S~ ..~ .- ~ - - .- o (.) E J! e CD c..oC ...., "C.... C 0 ca CD t) 0) ~S .. c m C'CS E > "'C S co - c - C).2 .- ca CD c.~ E S ca "C u c Q) ns > .- J!) U) U) c ._ e>> .... 1( = e>> .e c "'CJ ns c Q) as =- tn C C .- CD 1: .~ o ;t:! o u tn crJ .- 0) .e e ... U) ~ ~ C! .... en(/) .5 ~ .!!! .~ 1: G) ~ -t: ~~ . . ~"....~ J ~~~ 't'".c~ .....,.... .. .. .~m~f'~..tt~;'~:1i:~'.~--,::.t..:~. ..'" ~:. .:: ~. ' t~'''ii''Y::~'''I'-.I~t('',."""^,,, ,,' Lr;'~~f.Ii....ad.-I:".-.l;S"""-,Ij-" "". ~J."_ ".., - I:l 0) u 0) 1- 0) c.. :5 ~ ~ 0 " .c ::s t/'J .> I/) .. .. c ctJ 1- 0 I/) .... 1- ~ ~ l- eu - 1- ~ (.) ctJ ~ - .$ I, c.. ~ Q) " s ~ .c ~ 0) .... ca .... e i' CU ,(I) CO C Q) S 1- ~ .. c: I' eu e I' E ~ ::s .. tn CO ~ .2 c ~ .n tn I- I', en 0 " c .5 .... 0) -0 .. 1- ~ .S CO >- C C c: - I- .- u.. " '. ~ .~ e ... ~ ..... CO ~ ...... E .5 ~ ~ 5j ..... - '-- ~ CD ns U) CO tnS c. c: ~ m .- , , en .S 0 (.) .0 .- C:' "C ~ c .t:J c a- .5 b ::s J9 .0 co (L) e c:: E ~ .t:; ... . U) ..~ Q) en 0::,.... cts ~ Q) . U) ~ E"e .c..c:: 0 ~ Q) Q) t:n ....CJ U) o cu Q) ns ~ ,'( ...."C .(J (J .5 II .... (1) U) C "'ClCl) :;:: ~ II~ cum ..... 0) ~ ::s cu c= .5 ~ e ~ (.)+1 U) .. .. U) ~ -I/) CD CD f! ClS ~ ...... ~ U cu..... CJ) U Q. CJ) i, ' = 0 -- CI) (I) ...... ~ ~ 1- Q) (L) I C) Cl ~ ;: 1 e; c_ J!! .... .... .... ~ .e CI) I ' CCJ) ~ II ..... CD Q) ,e +oIC\S ~ cu > e Q) Q.) e II~ 0 oS! 1 CD.9! e e ..... ::s ::s- e ra ~ +' = cO .,.., "- .Q :s.... (I) .s .e ~ UJ ~ ~ .5 eel) 1- c 0 0 1- CD 0 1:0 ....c ~ !g (.) ~ em 0 0 Q) d!. d!. ~ ' . 0._ 0 ~ U.c 0 0 0 tn Q I.- . . ::J:t:: . . . . , I, i I ' I i - , ",,~'"'''''''' , ': ,.. ~ ' " .. " ; ... ~ , ~ ,( ) ',' - ~/. ..: .. 1''[, ~'~. , :'.1. , , ' "" . ~ . : "- ~ u O' r:; i J = 0 \C " , , ' \ .' '.. " " I,' f '.' F " " ." "~ " t ;, ~' ':-t' , " ~:; ~~, , ''i, !. ~\, ' , ". ~. <', CD C o U) .- ~ ... .- - .r; ~ d) .c +'" +'" cu .c ..... e ::s rn c .- " 0' ..... .. c.. E e .c u c ::I ca - G) :5 CD "t:J e m c... ::s'O "t:J c"C ns ::s c e .- c.. SCD c .- .c ns c E cu o Co) .....b ~ o Q...S g 1: -J e tn C1:S Q) 0) ~ .5 c:: e .S t:n ~ CI) -~ ~ -0 c:: (l) ~ ~ Q) lea t:i 8? 'Xl Q ~ ~' .11111111 ,< ~ 1i:~-"I~.,,,-..t.~ ,., mtl':~..~tt;'tt~l~~l~~:(~\c:",~,~;, ~ < ~;: .', . ' la~~ '~.Jt'rt~nr...!,,::~,,~""~r.,.~ ",'~ ..~", ~ ,J1,O,-'l:;t.'J-:;.;....:{"'u..<".~f: - 'I ': ,; , ~ ~ ~ (.) .g .... CI) a:s CD c:: o ~ .~ ~ , .... :--a U ~ ~ ~ o ..c: CI) ""- o c:: o ,~ ....., , ca l!! ::':(1) J!!~ CI) ~ ..5..Q ,.' II ~ .. V) ~ ~ en (ij ~ ,t:: 0 o-6-a ..Q :::: a.... ~ :::J ~ r:: .Q U) , CD cts CD ~ ,5 ~ c: ~ :::: ~ C\1 (.) 'I-i e ~ ~~1\i S Ci) 't;) e J..- Q.. ,s e CD :::, ..... -0 ~ -a ~ &: --..c 0 ' '..... ::s ~ .c:: a .! ~~, e ~ c: .Q ..... t:: o co Q) 0 ~~~~ ....... J-... ' Q) ....... J!! CD ~ J9 .sti::.s . . . . . , i: ,~ , . , ' 00. ' ~ u ~~ ~ 00. ~ '.' , ~ '~ ~ I' II ~ ...... ; ~ a:s (.) ~ (.) .g 'N CI) ctI CD c:: o '-- CD ..Q ~ ...... -0 (1) ...... ~ (.) (1) Q: . \, - I: , ' ~' ~ ~: ~ ~. .\ I ~ -e t: as ca 0 (1) [Q -.-.U ~ c: ~ SW ~ CtJ Q) .!!! Q) ~CI) ~ . ~::J~ ... .~ ~ .g e ~ c:i fI:i "' CI) S .5 CON~a~ ~ ~C)oCJ::; ~ c:) N' 'too.. U -== co 0 () ~1: ~ ~......c~~ ~ U Q ..... CtJ --- ""' ~~OfJ)OJ Q) S~Q)li~ t 1_ Lt) .(: CD C1J ~ ~ ~ C"") ...-. ..... ...... CJ)O)om~ S- lIlII:t ~ 'N ~. .w .. ~ ~.... ~ CI) "': ~ ~ ...... ...... ~ "" ::gemSe -o~ ~ 0 !.1 .... Q. ~ .S.... ~ ~ 'I" .:::' 0 u) ""' e CI) ~ ib CiS a> e e e:e:eQ)g,~8 ': :e ~ Q)'~ ~ 'S ~ ... ~ Q.,.Q ~..... P-' Q) .... c:: -.... ..... (,,) -..~ t: CD CI) :;: ~~ t: ::=; @ '" ..Q ~:::: M as Q) ~ ~ 0 CtJ .......:.. ..... 0:: e Cil ..... CI) c::: Q) a....... OJ CD Q) m,~ e ~ ~ ~ !!! ~ ~ ~ S Q).~ 'I" 'I" '!Ioooo ...... "'" r::: u: e G,) ~ Q" ~ .... ..... u5aeem~~ .s.s 0 UJ a..E co as .. . . . ~ Q) .t: ~ ..Q Q) ;S u) 't-.. (1) o ..... --~ ~1; o~ ~ CI) 8:-0 (Q c: r::: C\1 .~ m U) > CI) .~ ..... ~ e ~ e .~ o..Q (.) 0 ~ ~C\1 ...... .;: o~ .~ O)~ 'It:: ~ SC t:: CI)~ 'CCQ. . , .~~~,rn1f\~::r~{f~:~~~~~T-' .,~,. , ~ . . . . .'l.!1i';' ..<1 f~{1!,: ,r.....' 1I:,' q:' '. ' ..' . . "'!....;.:!.l.:,,\I~&i "lJli..a:Jt~;;;..., ,.E. f;: ,";'.. - ~~~nr;:a~~~~tyM~~:~~~~; '1 ~'etln:::t:: m;,;!1 SUBJECT: Park Name for Property on Gulf Boulevard on Sand Key ~ ~ ~~\ RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96 - 52 which contains the Parks and Recreation Board's recommendation to name City property located at 1551 Gulf Blvd. "Pelican Bay Park" lEI and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: . The subject property is located at 1551 Gulf Blvd. as shown on the map attached to Resolution No. 96 - 52. Plans are currently in progress to develop this park with two tennis courts, playground apparatus; pedestrian trail; and parking facilities. Plans also call for expanded parking to support beach renourishment activities. . The Sand Key Civic Association submitted a letter and It Proposal for Park Name" form (attached) recommending four possible names to be considered for the park. These include "Sand Key Bay Park", "'Pelican Bay parkH, "'Bay Vista Park", and "Gulf Key Park". The letter indicated that any of the four names would be acceptable. . Current Resolution No. 94 - 1 2 specifies that the Parks and Recreation Board will conduct an advertised public hearing to consider recommendations for park names at a regular meeting of the Board. This public hearing was held by the Board on Monday, July 22, 1996. . Based on information gathered at the hearing; and on criteria contained in the resolution; the Parks and Recreation Board approved a motion to recommend to the City Commission that the park property be named "Pelican Bay Park". :' :'/::::,;:::"N/i\':" Totel Comml..lon Action: o Approved o Approvod with Conditions o DenJed o Continued to: COlt.: Advertllld: Funding Source: o Cepltll ImpnlVllmllnt: o Opllrltlng: o Othlr. ;'~llll @-- D Not Required Aff,ct,d Partl.. fZI NDtlfled o Not Required f.t:H~~~1;~,~4~r.:~j;~~:::::.\,:~::.:~".:':..,:,.',: o None i...,.....t~ .~'1.~f~r~:"I-..._~........ . ,. ..."~,,.... ,'"....h C J .h..' .,.'.1 ......:. , '. .' ~ '" , . . ~ RESOLUTION No. 96 ~ 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, NMflNG CITY PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE ATI ACHED MAP AND LOCATED AT 1551 GULF BLVD. AS uPELICAN BAY P ARK,t1 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. , ' WHEREAS, the City is the ownerofrcal property located at 1551 Gulf Blvd.. which is being developed as a neighborhood park; and WHEREAS, the Sand Key Civic Association has submitted four (4) possible names for the property, one being uPelican Bay Park" I and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Board has recommended that the site be named "Pelican Bay Park", and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to formally name this site in accordance with the criteria established in Resolution No. 94 ~ 12; now therefore. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COM:MISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. In accordance with the criteria previously established, the property located at 1551 Gulf Blvd. and shown on the attached map is hereby named uPelican Bay Parku ",' Section 2.' This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. ' '!" PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August 1996. : ! ',\ . ." " , ; . Rita GaNey, Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to fonn and legal sufficiency: Attest: John Carassas, Asst. City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk , '.. , PARKS\BDOWNs\RW\RESOLtITION 96 - 51 ~ ; n,: . ---"' - . :' 't\JJ ~lS!/tQ j,$~ &J~~ """ 't'~() ~.,~ ,~g.r... .E:J ""J 't'or, ~. @ G~~ $ !!lJ eJ f/~ &J~ ~ ~ ARK PROPERTY A8~ CABAN '6l/ CLUB NDO ,----------""""". .. ',> ,'~ . c ~, 'i. .... ' ./- .f' .. City of Clearwater, F10rida Parks and ReaeatJoo Department PROPOSAL FOR PARK NAME Pleasc DotC: "The Par/u and Recuarwn Board will not consider an)' requests to rename an exlstlng park." (Resolution #I 94-12, Attached) Proposal date: ~,rJr:. ~.1 17'b 1. What is the current common or Wlofficial name of the park or property to which this application refers? \\ A ,~ 115' (.l.. n c."..,-=t: ~;Jf. ~fJ.1i 6/111 1'r-;~'7 2. Location of the above park or property: '" I 0 S- e' G LA. 3. RECOMMENDED NAME: nc:!. K e iO ~ r bp, y V, s1fl PIU~ K. G ~ I ~ Key R:JR 4. Will this new namc rcfer to the entire facility? }(1 Yes 0 No S. If you answered 'NO' to the above question, please explain which area or portion oflhe facUity would be affected by lhis recommended name: 6. Name and telephone number of the individual and/or organization recommending this action: c::- I V /. . ,] . .Ji WI It./'rJI2' 1 t? '::, Jh{tJd 1\'('" (.} vIe !-j->"S''.rJ1 ,Phone: 59 "'- Cia af-Lt , 7. Reason forthis request (attach addiLionaHnfonnation as needed): piA rn , n1 0 +. TIre.' New PAR K, ,., I-re 1: . , 5'::(14- 8. Has the local neighborhood homeowners association been contacted regarding Lhis recommendation? ~ Yes, 0 No 9. Is the association in favor oflhis recommendation? (You may attach verification) ~Yes, 0 No ] O. Printed or typed name of person completing this application: 1nABJ fr' ;1') itS)o i1J e,. f; ec /j 5 t::c f} The abov~ action is submitted for consideratioll to the City of Cleanvater PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD. Date: (0 CJ-h 6 , '--J Signature ofappticant or designee: "' ate 1 J A sUIvey of homeowners livi around the park y be required. .. f'2 TIle Parks and Recreation Board will conduct an advertised public hearing for this recommendation at a regular meeting of the Board. ~ Based upon criteria contained in Resolution 94-12 (attached), the Parks and Recreation Board shall fonnulate a reconunem!.,tion on the proposed name and forward their recommendation to the City Commission for a final decision. ~ signed nnd submitted. this appliC{ltioD bw>mes an official City ofClearwutcr document and as such is to be retained by lhe Parks and Recreation Department in IlC(:{Irdancc with Slate Jc:c.ords retention guidelines. For further infonDlltion <<lntact the Director ofPnrkt and Recreation. P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater. FL 34618-4748. lvarks:\data\wpmes\jon\parlauune.doc) Form' 1600'()292, Rev 2/96 . ..- "'.. ., 1340 Gl"f Boulevardj Suite 2-S · Clearwaterj Florida 34630 Telephone: (813) 593-2495 June 12, 1996 Mr. Ream Wilson Director of Parks & Recreation City of Clearwater P.O.. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618-4748, Dear Mr. Wi 1 son:' I am enclosing the form for the naming af the park on Sand Key. Four names have been sugge~ted through the input of Sand Key residents and final decision by an SKCA Committee and acceptance by the Board. Please make it clear that the n a me s are w r it t e,n inn 0 par tic u 1 a r 0 r d e r 0 f pre fer en c e . We felt that we would like the Commissioners to make the final choice. If you have any questions, please be in touch with Dick Ruben, 595-2736 Sincerely, Marilyn Maslowe, Secretary Sand Key Civic Association ~ ~\ ~lt~~ '-11\ ~~~ ~, /!b.-P,k ~ ~ r~ ;t ~ d; d z-4t}, ....., . ~1-<< nA'~~ ~~ p~d,J~ !rccr:~\!"';,:::'~~ li z:4.~' ~"/~/{' . ~ , c" t. ,~' / ~ ~' '__ (--.:2?~ " .. J ~ t ~ 14 199~ - " . 1-+ 1\\ Clearwater. City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum ~5 Item #: ~. IS. cr~ Meeting Dale: SUBJECT: HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRACT RECOMMENDA lION/MOlION: · To extend the health insurance contract to Prudential Health Care System of Tampa Bay, Tampa, Florida under a fully insured funding arrangement for the contract period of January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997, at an estimated cost of 3,569,279.20 and to offer a three-tier medical option effective January 1, 1997 lEI and ihat the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same, BACKGROUND: In 1994 under direction from the City Commission, our insurance consultant, Wittner & Company, prepared a request for proposal for the health insurance contract. Wittner and Company worked closely with the Insurance Committee, composed of representatives of the four unions representing the City employeees (CWA, FOP (Sergeants and lieutenants), FOP #10, and IAFF), Supervisory, Administrative, Managerial and Professional (SAMP) representatives; representatives of City pensioners; representatives from the Human Resources Department and the City Manager's Office. Effective 1/1/95 the City: . Awarded health insurance contract to Prudential Health Care System under a fully-insured funding arrangement. Prudential's bid allowed contract extensions at guaranteed renewal rates for 3 years. . Continued the contribution of premium for individual coverage. . Continued the contribution subsidy for dependent coverage (or the HMO option ($32.33 per month for calendar year 1997). . Continued the employee's dual coverage (the City pays for single coverage (or one employee and pays the amount of the single coverage for the second employee towards the dependent coverage. The second employee is listed as a dependent.) . Contract was renewed for 1996 at an increase of 6% for HMO and 7.79% for Prucare Plus. For 96/97 the City of Clearwater budgeted an estimate of $2,310.00 per permanent full.time employee per year, which included $10B.00 per employee for the PPS mental health and substance abuse carve out. The 1997 rate increase (or Prucare HMO and Prucare Plus is 8%. The renewal cap (or 1997 per Prucare's original bid is 8% for HMO and 12% for Prucare Plus. , Reviewed by: Legal Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt. IS ACM Other Originating Depilrlme~\_~ Human Resourc~ . Y User Department: various Costs: Estimated $3,569,279.20 Total .(). Current Fiscal Year Commission Action: o Approved o Approved w/Condillons o DenIed o Continued to: ~ Advertised: Date: 9\) Paper: X Not Required Affected Parties: o Notified o Not Required Funding Source: o C.lplll11mproytmenll X Operolllns: o Other: Attachments: Prucare Insurance Premiums Submitted by: City ~/f.c( Appropriation Code 590.07000-54560 1.590.() 00 o None o Printed on recycled paper Agenda Item - Health Insurance Contract Page 2 of 2 . The fiscal year 1996/97 employee insurance budget code includes funding for this contract and funding will be requested in the 1997/98 employee insurance budget code. Three Ti~r Medical Ootion Currently, the City offers a 2-tier (employee and employee plus family) option. The Insurance Committee met during late June, 1996, to discuss and review the results of the "Tiered Medical Survey" that was distributed during mid-May 1996. . Out of the 1,650 surveys distributed 1,148 responses were received. · 619 voted "yes" for a 3~tier option and 356 voted IIno". · 173 responses were not able to be deciphered. As a result, there were 975 useable responses. · 187 voted yes or no but indicated that they had no dependents; therefore, they were backed out of the count because decision would not affect them currently. This left the following breakdown: K:ii"?":';';:H>.~~~~~e~,'.'..:; '" , . ", " '." ,,' '. , , " ", ,,' . ;:.'\:":.",1""'" ."ThreeTlerYes. ,,619-134.- 485 :. .. , ;':':::';';::::, :..:' ':;,':'S:~:.:Th~e'e:Tier}-!6::' . '356\- 53 ''';' 303' '(Vesta No ratio =1.6 to 1)':". I~i;':;;':\';;:'~~U,I"~'" : ..,:;':',:'> " .",' " , ' , " . ,~:.:';./,.I,/' \:",(;;:'.>VeS':~ ,485{97S..,..;;,; .',',j :", . 49~7% . \,...i.;::':-\.::;;:)i":'.<.~':,~::NO'.;;.;. ~303/9~"5' ';;:', .... 31~loio ' ~.{:;"\':".:'-:~:.'. <:~"';'\:>Not'Aff~ct~d' . ~ '18'7/975'~'.:-"19..2% . ,~:"::;~::)'.::~:.:;~<'..'.;:-\.~j'ota(' .~. .::... '.',' I .., ,100%. " i . -: ' M \ , . " , . ., , ~. . · 71 respondents indicated that they currently have no coverage for their dependents. . 69 respondents indicated that they would drop City coverage for their dependents if the City offered a three-tiered option;14 of these indicated that their dependents would no longer have any coverage. · 34 respondents indicated that they would move from "no coverage" to add dependent coverage if there is a three-tier option. This would result in a net decrease in uninsured dependent coverage. The Insurance Committee has recommended that the City offer a three-tier medical option (employee, employee + 1, employee + 2 or more) effective January 1, 1997. Offering a 3-tier medical option does not increase the City's cost per employee nor does it affect the renewal rate. '1 . .',. ,'<0 ::....~ ~.' ..~.,l 1\ ~,_~,I' , I PRUCARE INSURANCE PREMIUMS PRUCARE PLUS " , Monthly 1996 Rate ,< .\ Employee Family 194.06 473.31 CIty Contribution 1996 194.06 194.06 Monthly Payroll DeductIon 196 ~o- 279.25 Monthly 1997 Rate City Contribution 1m Monthly Payroll Deductron '97 " Employee 209.58 Employee + 1, 345.82 " ' Employee + 2 or more 576.37 209.58 209.58 209.58 ~o- 136.24 366.79 PRUCARE HMO ,<: ...',. Monthly 1996 . Rate City Contribution 1222 Monthly Payroll Deduction 196 i ., ' ~(,::, "Employee ;"}", Family I ,~::,' ' : ~s~,< ' I:~"l. " I," ' I :,~: " Employee ' I:;:: : Employee + 1" ,:,' Employee + 2 or more 11,(: '(1-. , 164.12 ' 400.04 164.12 194.06 ..0- 205.98 Monthly 1997 , Rate, City Contribution , 1997 Monthly Payroll Deduction '97 , 177.25 292.46 487.44 177.25 209.58 209.58 , ..0- 82.88 277.86 EMPLOYEE COSTS FOR DEPENDENT COVERAGE ,\ " " .... 1996 Biweekly Emplovee Cost 1997 Biweekly . Employee Cost (Emplovee + t) 1997 Biweekly Employee Cost (Emplovee + 2 or more) " , \' : PRUCARE PLUS 128.88 62.88 169.29 PRUCARE HMO :' DUAL COVERAGE PLUS 95.06 38.25 128.24 39.33 .(). 72.55 DUAL COVERAGE HMO , 5.51 -04 31.51 ,..., . ;~ ' ' ;IX'" :;'i~ ..' '. ,,' ::(). " . I, I ," ..,'. J . ~;.: ~.'i.....:> ~\: '. \. (3) I" ~ ,. #121- \~::;}5 Miles G. Ballogg 1620 Clcnrvjcw Ave. Clearwater, FI 34616 (813) 586.6331 August 8, 1996 City ofClearwnter Insurance Committee clo Human Resources Department! Municipal Services Building P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748 Subject: Projected Premiums for Dependent Coverage Dear Committee Members: This letter'is in regard to tbe projected premiums for Employees with two or more dependents. I have several concerns regarding the proposed increase for employees who fall in this category. 1 am also concerned about the process that was used to decide the fate of employees with families consisting of two or more dependents . The first major concern regards alTordability and equity. As proposert, employees with 2 or more dependents will realize an increase of $862.68 an~ually bringing the total annual employee , contribution for insurance premiums to $3,334.24. Is this affordable for working families? J am personally in favor of a tiered system and 1 feel that more dependents require a larger premium. I am willing to take responsibility for coverage required for my family. However, I feef that the proposed increase is far too excessive and docs penalize employees with families that consist of two or more , dependents. I also feel it would be unfair to determine high risk employees and place excessive premiums on them because they use the insurance services on a more frequent basis. I believe the concept of insurance is to spread the risk among the user group. The concept of group insurance is not to polarize high risk groups or people with more dependents from low risk groups and or groups with fewer dependents. The second major concern is Ihe process of how the decision was arrived at to charge IJlcse additional premiums to families with two or more dependents. I recall n survey being distributed to employees regarding the tiered concept. However, I do not recall being infonned that the results of this survey would impact my annual income by $862.68. Employees deserve a chance to review and fonnally comment prior to a commission meeting on information used to make that decisions that will impact them financially. Now that the recommendation has been made by the Insurance Committee, [ propose that the employees have a chance to express their views in a public hearing or by re-surveying the employees using the actual proposed premiums. While I do believe in a tiered system that is equitable to all involved, I do not approve of the proposed premium structure. The approval of a tiered-concept is not approval for the proposed increase in insurance premiums. If the proposed premiums are instituted, [ feel that families with two or more dependents (including my family) will be forced to seek coverage outside of the City for their dependents . The loss of this ponion of the group will result in fewer people being covered by the City program and hleher premiums ror the rem~lnrne.l!ml!n. ". 1 ~~' c' ".l :(~'.,' -'.l ~.~ > , . ~ "" \., ~ l . >"q:':' .' l!'t"',\.". ~ " ' , '.'. ~ ' . o. / , . 'I? .. - d-S ., , , . , . The following are addilional recommendations regarding insurance coverage for the City: :'. , " · . Take advantage of the competitive market and bid the Insurance out on a more frequent basis (Can we get a better deal?) . · Offer more than one option for the tiered system that is morc equitable for all involved. · I. Research what other public entitles have instituted regarding tiered systems and present this to the employees for discussion and or a vote. . Implement programs city wide to reduce risk and reduce premiums. . 'Research and implement innovative insurance programs. ':c, Thank you for your consideration of these issues. :~: ',;:, I '. . '. Respectfully, ,;.':1 .,..~ ~ H-, Mn~s G. Ballogg . .:.I~~~.J"' . , . ~ ' )'b " i;~X{:' '/'" ~, ,;'. i ,. ,:~' .. ~ . .: cc: Betty Deptula. City Manager ~i.~:;:... , ~~~~: :. ;:(.;:: , .~:~~,!~ ' ~~I~~'.. ' " ~r\ h'- ; I f i , 1 I ! .. ( ".' ,', '1 '. >1,;1;: . . ,. ';{::I~(. '.' '. ': ,.'1. f' I'. :,~> .'..':'1. : ~'.~. ,''J.; . t. . \ , , '. : , \ ; .. . .. " I \ I ! ~ ;. I , I. .\ , " .' . (~:' c':'! 'l ~:r',. ' c" , \.';" ~.j,;. ',_ ' :~"~~, " ;~ .;'i ~ j ~ ~ . .' " ':~ ~ :.~; ..',' , t .IY. . l:.,.. .1', <, ., ,\''1 1~~L' I' .::.' . :~~~.., ' "~: .' . ~;~;.~~:"l' ':;.' ~. , , .,r'. ~r " t~~~7~'~-:.~.~..' ~ .:'j',~ -,' '.'\ ., . " . .,.--," ..fj.....,.w..............':.-... _.rl'....._ .,~._~-~..'<..-._-- , ~ ...... ..~,~~~,~'.. -.............-.., ~.\.. .,........H,..I".......~,~.~;I.~t....~"..' .._..<-Jt,.l-'-....D~.......~..I'I, o 4 I. I _ .-J.j.. ! re.. I / -{-fdM ~''"ff' i ;;)5 AUG 1 Ii 199B Clearwater Polle'! Department Interdepartment Correspond,nc, Shl" 1':h:1 . " Sergeant Joe TenBleg, Welt Patrol District COPIES TO, COMMISSION AUG 1 5 1996 PIil::::iS CLER~ / ATTORNEY TOt CITY OF CLEARWATER INSURANCE COMMITTEE .' RESPONSE:TO .,.HREE TIER" lNSURANC~ PROPOSAL AU8u't 7, 1996 T E RESULTS OF THE "TIERED MEDICAL SURVEY" ARE MISLEADING AND POSSIBLY ^ MI >>REPRESENTATION OF THE EMPLOYEES DESIRES. I BASE MV ASSUMPTION ON THE :^CTS STATED. · OUT OF THE 1,650 SURVEYS DISTRIBUTED ON L Y 1,148 RESPONSES WERE RECEIVED, 502 NOT RECEIVED VOTES. o · 619 VOTED "YES" FOR A ~.TIER OPTION AND 356 VOTED "NO". .'. . ., .~. '73'.R&&PeNS!'WlRI'Nm~BL&TO BE DECIPHERED. ~""RI!!~~H~R!~W~REI'::;~",~ '.; . : " t 75 USEABLE RESPONSES, · : 187 VOTED YES OR NO BUT INDICATED THAT THEY HAD NO DEPENDENTSj j:rHEREFORE THEV WERE BACKED OUT OF THE COUNT BECAUSE THE IDEClSION WOULD NOT AFfECT THE.~ CURRENTLY. FOR AN ISSUE AS IMPORTANT AS THIS I HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLfM WITH THE DECI!iION BEING MADE BASED ON THE RESULTS OF AN INCONCLUSIVE SURVEY. THE t.URVEV WAS TO BE MANDATORILY COMPLETED, WHICH IT W^S NOT, 502 NOT RECeIVED VOTES, THE SURVEY ALSO LACKED IN CREDIBILITY DUE TO Tt-IE 173 RESPt)NSES THAT COULD NOT BE DECIPHERED AND TABULATEO. THE FACT ST^~NC; THAT 187 VOTES WOULD NOT BE TABULATED AND INCLUDEO IN THE 1 SUR Ff BECAUSE OF THE CURRENT LACK OF DEPENDENTS IS LUDICROUS AND 1 ~ ,'1!." i; ~IISIdiJ 'QlJ.NI;.IlA'iKtQ.~BitUBILJTY, WHO'S TO SAY D,EP,~~ QENTS ^RE~'ll~ ,lH~. .If '~"',U;\ . 1, i FU RE FOR SOMEONE. ." ~ . -...,: r. ", ',r.1l>\1., II, I I' DISAPPOINTED IN THE LAX WAY THE SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED AND DISP .EASURED AT THE FACT I'M BEING PENALIZED FOR HAVING ^ FAMilY. IF r,M REA ING INTO THIS WRONG, FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME. Z d Wcf aa:z 9661,Sl 'EIl:J . :-s.L : L.Ql:I t..\.'....:- .>,~....~'~. ............~ ,. .. ,:\ AUG 1 4 199B T: CWA '+MI Iudy Smith . COPIES: . Insurance Committee S Tiered Medical Survey August CS, 1996 . 1 ve icylcwc4 the results 'of the Tiered Medical Survey. . "it-iS diSturb1nato-See th8tfOr "ihoio ~-- wi a family +2 or more will have a substantial increase In the coat of lnsumnco. The overall Inc · so of 8~ Is $66.36 a month. If I wcr:e to pay the + 1 COlt for my dependent. separately tho I would,only pay an increase or $39.38 a month (38.2' x 3 - 11..7~ - 95.06 . 19.69 [bl tQOkly] x 23 - 39.~8 [monthly)). Those with 4 depcndcntl would be aav1ns monoy If not paJDB IndIvidually for each penon (38.25 x 4 all 153 [biweekly) DOt 128.24 (biweekly)). 'lbat w ld be $49.52 11110nth aavlnp. How III tblt fair? . WO}o not even receive an 8% cost ot living Increase a year. How Is it expected that we are abl, to caoed thls type of Increase In our medIcal benefits? Tbct.c bonefits are very much , ~ted in our blah coat of medical services today. There are many who can not afford thta fit now and with thb lncreasc It Is puit1ns this benefit totally out of reach. This Incrcuc force mc to wIthdraw my membersh1p from tho Union to cover thla lncrcue. ThIs mmendaUon Is Nal actlna In the beat Intcl'C8t of TIlB FAMILY. I was one who did te8 ond to tho survey and 1 still do not l'OCOmmend this chan,gc. As a Union I would hope that we lid not support this chanao. Please respond. it. '. s: d Wd 10:2: 9661 'Sl '91:1 :'''8.1. : I...QL:I f....ll~~..:....G ~ ~~.~~:.. IUL:'...l..r,...Y'!ll..-~..... ..... ~~... . . _ ''''~ , p"""" ". . _-.'1 .. .' ..; ,J ., d ~. . ,~ ' I I I i =-~.1 ==]=--.--....... .... .. . _..TO f jf~rit.JJ.~~~jJM~j~ . ". ...._---\ :--'--'I"-'-'~'" ........ .....' ...--. ..... .., ..,.. ,... ...-..." . _,__. ~~~.~A~)..~~J2~..... .." """-1' ._~~....__".......M.._.. ,...... . ....,. , . . --~...:zw.i~CQ!'~B.~tJd~~ f.~ ~.fJ} -kw..fl:(~ I ~ ~~~rf ~.044r.~'~ ....~:= __ '_. j",,-_S!J,rf1iefiL g{ .lrk:l"~ . OJ bt. .. etl?RI9Y~ ~r.~~ #.L. Col!nl.!~o~___ --.. . _...-1t)~~.~. m.I1DVI.rk .n.e4('/It. . ~ve"'~e fir. ~~5'''II(S ?/,rlt;(..... . . 0---- ..-1{LfJ:u:liis' !.., ~f(~'1_.ifJ~~. ColJJ.tnl ~ hfJ.~. ..h.~r4 fW;1.,'1y, wlr7~/a(~&.. .... .... _._.... ' lcL~tea.L.qf..:j.v..mp.1!J5. ~ ~ txuldqJ'fJOA. .; .r.W.I;~ .~ frbp.1:!& . ... '" ..__ . :m~ettf:_.1P_.ilJr4:.p.tP.~~. .... ,... " . 00"" . . . .. -_.~.. ....--.-....-. .. ._.... .,. _.~L..ih1pro.V~M~t. ~~ ~(l1rqM ir;A:fi~.(l.S co~/" ~fle:u((~t~ Yv1~f:. ....,.. .._. ~ .f~~ :J1~~~.(/~ ~.I.tMdl!:S ~r,,!,(J./t!feJ. ~~(r1j" ..fkfS aA!~/fte~_~.... ....---1 - ,.~t ..!&~. ..Li.j!Ie. .Lt1~rMa"'Pf1,. ,~. {)rbYJJ~ ~~. ~t1(IR(oY.C:S;~ . .. .--: ... .....-j aLt..J&!!r;de.:..pvl9l':. IT!..: -#.,e,.. :.{ r'Id/ .$~"- Je <;. ..lC . -& (JI'O ~S'.i" ~JYllI.d.. .__-! .4J~.+Ij~.<t_lf).k('gfd.../fJ flus . b.t2Je/fl- ~r.J._ s/lfMfcf. . Pe. ~~---.. ___ 'j 4{.' :tJ!gy;_~tQ.je,S~m(. o~_ &..If/ !4mrfl,:hifl ..ifi4egr!..t!.... kf:.__. ..p.r.t&.ideJl._.lrldruIM ..:Mf!-...Sf!~cm.cs. .. ~qf,.~ 61i1.:I...&...!1~rrL6y,.. fJf .-- . ._.. J .~lf!a.wiJ__M ..I:?!rR....fAf1t#...~...~fM.t?K~r. ~~(~~_. _(Jf:...~r...P.(bI!~/~ _ ...j ~~f5Jf-O.f.Jf!k,r_.~J!gtJ.fllCAM.. mfih~.fr~~~4.r~.L '0_ : ~~..~t:J#!o.oafJ.~n.~t..~t/bMefif d:.f:le(~~s:.,.~.. &.s~ t!i.e:,.. --1 -4~e.. -IRe .$.u.'!J~'Mtij.. _$'fJJ~f19~r ~. ~_..~M_pidke., .~b~.~.k_ ---'. .Jl1Y.j:l. ~.f~hCt1dt....JJ..!J'lh..-eJ!~'1' S!'~Hhl.$.S).Qr.\.. oo~.~~~ ..._.' : _..~:t1YLC.lW:l\I.~. -Q..(\~.. p-&mp./{'1 . .MSlller~.. . .... ,-'." - . .- .. I _~~_.fMp/.~~.~..:M .~ ..4(((J)(S Qi'e.. l-d~:h:.Q.._ .... __.' _._44L..:-hL~..c!.\SUiiH\C.e. 1tt!..U-t1J.~..,,-~..r!~Jnmdu. ~L.. ~~I. " ~~~~Se.a.r:chk...~tf , ,.~ ..p'(e..ClCuCZ\.. -t~ .-dQH o...\".5.-..~~-~ I JU I ....-. I ..._..____, ..... ........__...,....,.. ......-1_. ~_... .__ "__'.'~ __.t ~.-.. '... ..-.....--.- II oli..~ ., ~.......... .... . ' '" d Wd 20:~ 9GGl"Sl'EJl:f :"Bl AU61.J'~ ,.. ..,.... ... .. '.'.. .'1/1.( I~~ . --..... , ... "_"-411I...__ ~___+-".,...,..' : I..nl;j - . I. ' ~;~.. .) I ...... ... "1 .... . - ..... '" j ---. i '"''-'''1''''''''' ,......... ,.......". '. _.....~..1' ...., .....l--.~-'.. .. "..., ., ......,... ...--- "'1 -----.'1... ...__.~ . ----... i -"-'1'" ,., . ..-..--....... . ......, .-.-... . . . _._.._..~. --'--"'1' .....~u_........ ", ..... -........... ... "-" . . .." ,... ..."" ~ .. .-..,.,....................-,...--..... , '....J: .....e.r.;\P-l!;\~u.s. ~~l CR.l\l~e! O(\.~~.H:p.;;.\IYI~.:(g,_~._.-- ....._~~o.t$. , M.~~~\A.ve.). 'N~~le...~. CJ.~... ...M~t 'P.v.-~~~J~-_~~,,~~..... ---I ..,....~IJe..r~e, ~.~..r:' ~...~p \ Q ~~.. . " '0' -..-. ... '. ". --..-. ...,,, ...._-_.--.. ..--.j. ..._.....1.. ...~p,I~~.".,~J.ell:~..m,~. +k..~~~...CA>~_Qf:.... .......- __~, . ," '--il~~..~v~~ 'Q_\ft._~~". .~9d.t." .~,~g(~~_ V\o~...__._ -- ._.~ .. --i~. _~~M.t\~t_._~:b::h~.. .~. ~v\4~~ .~..,.. ..-.--- ....- : __ --.. i p9.h~_, . .W ~~. .. 0-...S.t9""l ~,'w.. sa..\.H.~~s. f1.~",..,- ..~~..~k..__ _...; ,...~.&..~hc.a..lt;t... \l\~V:e.<!..."'U;.g... -t1--e...- \ (\ ~rM.(cl-LQn......f.1~v.~4~ ~- ';.. .... · -..i .....-i~~~,nil~..-~.p. bPf~j:ci~ ~......~lM..,....~~_.~~W\l-llt"6- on 'I _.._.n' .1-.s~~(.f)-h,~~"._..k__.._~ \.~~............ . ~~__.lYh.P..V9,~~._..~._.._.- .~~ ---.. ......1~-.-~~~..-~~~, \1~~. .~~t..._YLh..~ ..h ~~._-- : . .~..flhL_lii_.....~M~~......~'(g..~:.._~'(~n~ u.~_~ . . ....... .......,.~ ~ it ......._101II._.,...."". ,. "" , t ""..._u___., ....,. ,.... -.;;r "'- ..._____..t....... ,...~..___.._... . '...._,___....'_..__._ L....... .....~-- ---. H'"_. n._._..___...._.... . - -..-.-s .,....... ...., ., ..,.....--... -. "'-~-_.~ -..-.---..-.". , " _...._.__.__.....\(\~el.~ 'J. --........ '._-- i "~---l '1--." .......,.,---..-..,..... ....---:--.........0_ '.(\_ ~ ...~_._..., .,........"..-..---,-----..---- .._ I ---j._...... ,,____.__... , .. _.__..__~. .....~:.._._, ....._.___ .._ ~-- __II......... __________.... ..,..t........ ...._...._f........ ._ . ..' ..., I t.f_._.____... ..... ., t...._ .....010.,....." .... .~.._"...,... ~_t_._._...t__._......~. "t ........h....~_,._ _._... ..,_..._....."...~ + ". ....f_____-...-~~_ ._.........._.,. '...._._~....._+'I_..-I.~.. ..' .~...................t,..___~_... ~ ,.....__ __.-.. 'fit... 1........._.._ __._....,..... ......~....,,~~ - , . : '"8.1. : l.oaL:I B:~.-T,~~.:..-,.......:...i-...t ~'.~I>>t,.l. c+_" ... Mf~rb;."r':~);~:~,: " . f', ," :';', ... ~ ., I~. , ' " <". "''''. \'" "'~ ' ;:'.': . ,,'. . ;"". . >" .: =. ~. I I~ I,,: ';'..,.! ',0, :.~~d" ~~" .".~;:,;~, ",:, , , .1'1 . ;' ,i c. ' ~. , ~'., ... '. c " ;);1 ~,. .~" !\;:, p',c.' ,... " /\' I :~ S'~ ' 'I - :c~.; ': '., . ,:",/, , "', l}< " ',\.,:c' , ''''' ~ ~:t\;.~' : ~ ~ ,~, " ~ ..., ' , :. ' ~il>;' , 'f' ':~:!,,~:~ . ,. ~:', ,: '\', . " , , '::(" .~ ~. .,J,,' ,\:-- i. ,: ~.': \,". :r;c " . ~ . '.-\. , ~ "" I , <. " ... ! , " ~ r.' 3 ~, . ~.' c " .. ~. t. ';' .~(~~ '; : ~;':;~' . 'j'i"'" , " ~ :.~~: ' .i \ ,~." " I;.';": ,',1>' ::.., t: 1t?J:',: ~~~.;!:::." ,";~:~r';: " , ~ ", I' ~i.;:':::~~r'.,i; ;"':'?":,', :,: ',' " ,; ,1,< Item # 26 ., " JO 45 \ ~ '~ I' i ',! ~ I " " , " 'I. . t ~ ~ " 'I \', ,. - J' 3.\5.'1(0 ~G CJ \< 3 '1.:f/ CI\( l ~.(;L CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartmental Correspondence TO: Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cler~ SUBJECT: Policy Book .' ,1 COPIES: Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager Pamela K. Akin, City attorney " , ' DATE: ~~1996 ',l~',; . , ',j , " Attached are the Commission Policies, as amended, per direction at the April 8 and May 6, 1996, Special Work sessions. There are a few issues, listed below, to resolve. Assuming direction is given regarding these issues, an item to approve the book in its entirety will be placed , on the Thursday, Augusyl';' 1996, Agenda. , \5 Policies not previously reviewed: BG-12 - Utility Transfer Payment BG-13 - Interfund Administrative Charge BG-21 - Review of Rates Schedules GA-14 - Special Event Street Closings CC-14. Televising City Commission Meetings ,1 , , , ' "," , ~~ >- '>: . " , Policies transferred from rules and/or rewording needing Commission concurrence: BD-3 - Fiscal Review Committee Terms CC-15. Information Available to the Public and Press CC-16 - Distribution of Commission Mail CC-17 - Strategic Planning ~ r , , . I., Need to discuss: BG- 4 - General Fund Unappropriated Retained Earnings CC- 2 - Commission Travel LI- 1 - Marina Slip Rental Fees GA- 2. Water & Sewer Impact Fees LD- 6. Scenic Corridor LD - 7. Easements - US 19 " ',f ,0 :1- " " " ., ',0 , . ~ . , .,.l " . ,0, .' , i:,'~.\}~ ,. ,. ""-','1h ' J'" )j:...~..\oJ,"""-y'" .'......~~.~...............'< ,tn" ,~~" ". ,> ...------- '<' : . ~ " ' : .. '~ ' . ,: " ":,.,' , : ~ \. .' ,', CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BO-1 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Boards/Committees Ad Hoc Committees Amended: 3/19/92 8/1/96 11."'-' Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 2/13/84 Work Session 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 4/8196 Special Work Session 1 " '" Statement: Task Forces. as well as. the Charter Review'and Budget Advisory Committees are Ad Hoc Committees. Therefore. members of those committees may also serve on another City Advisory Board. ' . . Until such time the City Commission determines to make the Environmental AdVisory Committee a permanent advisory board. it shall be treated as an ad hoc committee in regard to members being able to serve on other advisory boards. ',I: " , : I r '. ' '~ . '" " 1 " :1: ,<~ .. . ~, . ,f., : ~..~ '(', ,." ,:.' I :< l' - . 'c, .'~ : .", , I 1 , I I'" I, !'.. ['",-" , , :' , ., , ,- ' (,<'.' .\' > < ' . , ~ t:.:, ," <.. ., ;'; . ;, :~, -. I ,,< >~: ' ~~~' ., .','c',1 ':'< , - c: .' '. " :'": .';:. , f,:,. , " . '>': ' ;0' . .;;1 , , " , , " ~ : J (,' " ,:"t' " !:.:,' " '~::: .'; ,. I', I ,.;. " ,I.::. , :.1 . ..,: , . ';l. .L.;{'!.~ : , )~~:.' " I.:~ ; ~. > "." . \ '> , '."..' ': i -,": . ~ " , .1, No. 80-2 Policy Statement Subject: General Topic Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Boards/Committees Advisory Board Dinner Amends: ; . Rescinds: Reference: 2/27/84 Work Session 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session Statement: Each recipient of an invitation to the Annual Advisory Board dinner may bring one guest. In those cases where two members of the same household serve on advisory boards. only one invitation shall be sent to that address. Board members should attend at least one meeting prior to being invited to the annua 1 di n'ner . I, ~t',:' , !;~~' : ,I, , ~ ,," i r',~ ' ,.M..U....L,t;'.i,r.>~ .....t,.,~'i.o"'Wl;...___II..~'.. . . ."'-~~I"I-b.~...""L1"""''''~~'...~,.':''':''.t ..\ :... CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION 2 ), " ~.: .. .~ ,:. :, ; I.: " '. ,,., t '" ~ " '"c; ~' ~. :' 'I .'c, :~"~ ': r "...... .' , ':t l .. .' ~ ',~ . .,....'. ' .;, . 1 ',','1" . ;1: c', '. > ~ t~t>' I , ., /.,/"1 .,' ~ 'i, "I- , )~-":" ' . . i....,~ " .' ',\('~: 'I " j. .~': ~:.'''' :;J:":', '1".1\ .r.: ' ,r '" . .l: \ ':. >.:' .. ",",' '"f '. , ..,.." ",t '~" . , ': " ' ,~, 1'1 . ,. ,1<', CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION ,No. BO-3 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Boards/ Committees Budget Advisory Committee Terms Fiscal Review Committee Terms Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 2/27/84 Work Session 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session Statement: c " c ,Members'terms expire with the term of the Commissioner by whom they were appoi nted. ' Recommendation:' There shall be five members on the Fiscal Review Committee. Each Commissioner sh~ll appoint one member. Term in office shall run concurrent with the appointing Commissioner's term. 1 ' 3 .r - .:"..., ,~-: t , ::'.)'t, ,'.3. ' I' - ,.~ ~. ':,' > , ' " . I, ..-. . l~ 0' , . \' ' . . ,"- :t!'-:, ',' ' f.. ' ..' I ~ -'" p!", , ,;\ ~,'; , -, c:\. " ' c; ~ " " , ' , ~ I, . :., '. ,'. . ~'\, . ..,C' " . ,'. :,: " \' ':.' l:.,;, ' r:::',:" . {~.:~.: T ., :f/, ',~ " ' " CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION , Pol icy Statement I' No. BD-6 General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 3/19/92 Boards/Committees City Representatives on Non-City Boards Amended: 8/1/96 Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 4/8/96 Special Work Ses~ Statement: ' Representatives appointed by the City Commission to serve on Non-City Boards. i.e. Pinellas Sports Authority, Center Foundation. will be limited to ~ llQ more than 3 consecutive terms or 6 years of service. which ever is greater. , , These representatives shall keep the City Commission informed of the activities of the board to which they are appointed by providing annual reports unless more frequent reports are requested. " I ~ I ' 6 , ' " . ' ) . I. I' . I ... . ,; . .l,' ' :<'.' :;, '. ~ 1 , :1' ,. }) .... ~.' ,;:.': . -;,].; , ..: ~~, ': c: ~:, I ~;'i,~ ::. f}:/ ?<:;', c, ,.'1: ' .." ~. ,!:: .~ : ~ : :, ":." . , . t,C, .',1., ' ,". -. (,~~I /' ,.' : 'I'" , ',:' ~ " .::' .~ '!' : ,:~:, , " " :,'f . \. . t'.' r f ~ I I .,; ._:.': ,I ,".,.! 'E' ,\ . , ~. ;' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION ,I," Policy Statement No. BD~7 General Topic Date Adopted: 3/19/92 Boards/Committees Subject: Special Request ',' Amends: Reference: Rescinds: 2/18/92 Work Session CLK-l Statement: Requests .from Advisory Boards for special reports and/or projects will require approval by the City Commission prior to staff commencing efforts in . preparation of same. The City Manager shall have the discretion to approve certain reports and/or projects if. in his/her opinion. such report or project will be of benefit to City operations. ,....',_'.....' '" I ~.~ I .. ..... " t. .1,'--"". 7 , , I 'i~,;-r".~ :,,:. ,. . ~ ,f ' , ~. -, ',' , , ,', l' '" ,I.,.' .".". ".. !, ' , " ~ ' [, CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BD-8 .. !" Policy Statement j, I' General Topic Subject; Date Adopted: 3/19/92 ;, '.,' ! ~. ~\' r> . , Board/Commi ttees Representative Balance I .' ..e, I ' , ~; 'e Amends: Rescinds: Reference: ~".:.' " ' ~::;._ ',e, " '~k .' Statement: ;:y,,:, ~'l:> ":::':: '..' In maki rig, appointments to the ,City' 5 Advi sory Boards. the City Cornrni ssi on will ;\,:.:'~: ,,:,:.',:,: ....strive to maintain a representative balance of race, gender and area of the ;:>~:'.;' ,'.,!, City represented on those boards. , I:, " , ':(: ~ "~ " ~ , ' ' ~ ,H' ,. I~, ~ " , ,~\: J ' 'I, ~ I : ,'" . .".'" , " > ,t: ' ,,~.. r. ' ,~ ~; " !:,~:; . .It ~ . .,.:,. ; ~~~~' .'.~, ~ . '" '"f" , ;1.' r' ., .. '..., ' ,~',:~ ~ ..' .. " ' ;~:!.': , '~ '. . : ~ .', I ~ .' :'>.1., ' ~r, .. ~ , ~t\/' '" ~' ~ ~:.: , , ::~~. - . , t..,: ' >, . ~ . , , ' '.' l ",\ ' ,c) ~::- l ,:. ~ .. 8 j , l l, I ~.," ~ " :, f '" r;.: ' '. :~/:':: '.;:,' , :;\<;> :' t ,~,;" ': i . !, ", t I ~ '". .- ..L~ .." . ,~I~ f,',I. 'L':~,;,''';r:'' .~:'!.l '. ': " ,. ..~ " '.'P ~, \ ' I:" , , ," . ~):h:',:::, ,~~. I" i \~".I~ ~ i :0:, c'.. ~, , . : ~ ", : ';.; , " , ,'::i )1,:1, '; ..~', " ~ .", . I~:~ .. ';r.~> ' . ~ ".. I , ~~ ~,;:' 'e I . ...:~' .' , '~r' ." 'e'~ , ~;j,)::'" , '~'.~q' , :.lrL.: ' .' ~;" . , !/':'. ,'. ,:,:"; . i:',:" ,~,. i::~ \", ' :P\"... ,', ;':10' " , ,. .' . . , , , i:: '::;::','.- 1 ~ ' ',r..> ;,."; , ,', d':" < /~ '.' , ,', '.r, " :', " ;';"/. , ..'" , e', , ' f.Y<.<" '.. , ; ~ \. ' '.' ., ,.'\ . '., ' ?~:.. . P'. ' .,'1::. ;;;'i'~ u.... , ....... " ! .' I '~," .' ,. ,,' .. . CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BO-9 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 3/19/92 . .Boa rds I Commi ttees Non.Board Business Functions Sunshine Law Amends: Rescinds: , Reference: . Statement:' .':In . keepi ng wi th . the Sunsh; ne Law and the opi ni on of the Ci ty Attorney. '. adVisory boa'rds are requested not to schedule luncheons and other non-board business functions. This request is made in order to eliminate the possibil,ity of violation of the Sunshine Law.' . . , . .1 , ! I . I 9 .' , - ,} ,;,~,~:"~.'~'i'."'\''',>,.,::,:, ',) .' < ~ " ,. . . ~ . ,. J 0, " " ';>' ':'. '. ;, t. . 'J" . 'f".' e ~\.i. '. . I ;;~~~;: , : I""., '. I", . ,I' .' .p; , , ':'.,- , .,T.. 1, " ~\':' , N::;~ .;,;;' . '; ~. . :,'~\. '.' .:\::' ;~i:;;', ~ , ' .', ~ ,I. " ~ ~ .. . .'1.', . .., :"{; " > ~1~!~ i.... . '~i?~t'~.:-- ~ ' " o(J~t 'J : I ~ . .,' ~y~, : I. ., \"':".,{ . '. , r ,r,,~ ' ' ;.. ,,' .'" e '" , /.,. .' .~; . ~': I~ / " t/ -} .;),,', ,~, ~ '~~{': . . ,;",' : .,...'. ~,' , ,.:\: ' ~i~~'~":' . , ..'1.. . ' ,~' '+,' , . CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. 8D-I0 Po 1 icy Statement , General Topic ' Subject: Date Adopted: 12/2/93 Boards/Committees Input to Other Boards/Committees Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 12/2/93 Minutes Statement: .An advisory board may advise other' boards/agencies of concerns regarding . .i ssues if. the maj ori ty of the boa rd agrees to do so. However. an advi 50ry .,boardis not to state its position as policy. , I " ) . , 10 ,-"J. , i.' : .: ' ", , ' ..:' ~, >,1" ~! ' ~ t, ' ','~' , '. :<,~ .' , . ~ '. f, .~~ " ' ,i;;';, ,; ::~;' '. : '~ ~ L :. :,"'" 'C; , ' " !O,' ;1:', ' ~~ \ [,. ,:;'.'l ,': ( . .;I.~ . " ~.. \' ;~:(: " '. '~\J ' 'I ' .:";, .- "~,f:l' " ' ~:~~~ ' .I~~ . ., ,Ii'. ~.I , ", i '. l' I' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement No. BO-11 , , , General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 11/29/94 Boards/Committees Letterhead Amends: Rescinds: 11 Reference: 11/29/94 Minutes Statement: ' ,. Appropriate Advisory Board letterhead may be used when an Advisory Board. an Ad~isory Board Chair or Act~ng Chair writes on behalf of the entire board. Advisory Board letterhead will not be used when correspondence is written by an individual board member to express individual concerns. Advisory Board letterhead wi,ll not be used when an individual board member writes to other governmental agencies. citizens, companies or Clearwater employees concerning 'personal opinions. City staff will be available to type letters for an Advisory Board Chair or Acting Chair only when it relates to actions or opinions approved by the Board. not individual opinions. , J , , . ! r r' 1 ,e, ' I", ," I'''' , -, ' 'l" .' .' ~ ': " , " , ",' "'J;'}'" . ~~;;;;::::, ' \.{1'~_I' . ':/" " ~. ~. ~ :.::, '~~ ". ~' ,~ .: , ' ~~',~.'.Y: ~{(-:'" ~:). '. '. ~ ], ... , .:;' ~ , ' , ~ ' ' r',. ' ,l",: :, '/', .':~ ,H " ~": ' I;'.,~" . '.\r, ' : .' ~.~-; ''t\:, ~~~;,( :, W; , 'if :.' , ~';C.,' " '.. ~ .. , ;1,., :!,: ~ " ". ", ~ ',' (": . \1~: ?"'.:' , ')~~;:' >:' '~~~:.," ' ,', ~::;, ' : , ~, q~. ' < ~... ~ e ~'. ~ ~ ',: , ; ..., ~t-:, ":", , , .< CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No, 80-12 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 2/6/92, Boards/Committees Input to Advisory Boards,' Amends: Rescinds: Reference: ''2/6/92 #55 ! ' Statement; , When ,preparing an, agenda item to the City Commission on an issue that has gone . before an'advi sory board. any petitions or correspondence regarding that issue received' by the advisory ,board. shall be noted in the background. , " 1 12 .. " , , -,'e I: . "-; t: I :;c'.\..: ' \, ' 1.":- ',' .-,:',::' " , " ';-' ,; .'..1 . ,.,:". ~, i ~ L ~, ' " ;r::,;, ' . :~~' :.:, ' ,... " ,.', I' . CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION, No. BG-1 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 Budget Special Event Fees Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 4/4/82 Agenda Memo #12 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 10/16/89 Work Session Statement: The Special Events Cornmittee will review applications for use of City beaches. sidewalks and rights-of-way. Sponsoring organizations will be responsible for the costs of City servi,ces needed in conjunction with the events. All fees and related charges will be waived for City sponsored or co-sponsored events; i.e. Fun.'N Sun, Jazz Holiday, July 4th. Turkey Trot and Martin Luther King Parade. ,There shall bean annual review of City sponsored/co-sponsored 'events during the budget process. An agenda item confirming co-sponsorship and waiver of fees for those events approved in'the budget will be brought for City Commission approval at the beginning of each fiscal year. In the event additional monies are requested beyond what is included in the approved budget. City Commission approval will be needed before said additional funds are disbursed. ',,' I . , , , 13 ~', ~, I ' , ' " ,'~~ , ,... ~, " .. ,'. I :" , CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-4 Policy Statement I: I,', ' General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Ii' 'Budget General Fund Surplus Unappropriated Retained Earnings , ~" Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 'f: , " '! . ~I,:: . 1989/90 Service Options Manua~ Annual Budget Boo~s ", ' \'..' .. . " Statement: , . r ~ In an effort to ensure adequate financial reserves. the City has determined that a General Fund Unappropriated Retained Earnings equal to 10% of the , subsequent year's budgeted expenditures shall be maintained whenever "practical. Should funds in excess of 10% be available in any fiscal year. these funds shall be identified as available. and may be appropriated for specific Capital Improvement Projects or used to reduce the subsequent year's ad valorem millage. ' It has been determined that this fund shall be maintained as a contingency fund. and appropriated only in cases of emergency or urgency to meet unanticipated financial needs. " ' \ " I:" ~>, . ,--, , ~t :: 0'" ;'.', ' . , c. " ~ 1~ ' ~:' I , ',' ~. ' ," :~, 1~.' ~., I ~ ," , 16 ~, , " "> I', ~w'Jt~~"""~~~~:",,-----'-"~""'~~-"""""""~"\ttI"I...ri~2YjIo,, ~ ~~~ j ~i...~.'l{r''''' ~, .d.(;,;.',.I~,~ ,;.. J~~ L~~"':-",~ ~ . .,i. e \' ,.'~I..:~.:....~', :,:t,/:" e :.., ':. .t,'~' ,~. .):' , ',7':, ' , " ' ~ , . ~'~: : ~ :' . " ':~"~."','e ~ '. :.1/..;.,", - .... ' ': ~. . . ~ .', . ,: , '. y ~ : ,e,\ .: ,',: ' :. .'. . .' :,.':. '.='-..... "', "';.1 . .:,~':.-.',' , '. '.;,,:: ' ;;~' : ~~i\\"':: ' t.~ l : ;, ~ 'I . , r: ~. ~~, " . ~' I '...~, " ' t< !'. .! .' ".r" . ~: - ~ :': ' , !;~;;.", '. ?;L.. ' '.L' , ..' "\'r', " '." ' , ~' '( .;; ",> f..;/ " . . .( t. '. I ;i'~X' ,,~:. : ,~,d."1 . ,\'..~., . \ ;:': I '.~' : i(,:) :' " ' ~;"'. . \,' , t~:'.:,,'.'..'. ":;,:.,,, ,,'. I " . .. ) '-"'e' ' I'" 'J-. .. ; ~ '" ,.",,'. CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-5 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Budget Funds other than Genera,l Fund ,Arilends: Rescinds: Reference: 1989/9QServicc Options Manual Annual Budget Books Statement: Revenue budgets may exceed expenditure bUdgets except in General Funds, which must balance. However. expenditure budgets may never exceed available , , . " resources. . \ ! l ~ I " I i~ i. . ; ~ ; \ " , :. ~ , ! , ! \ .' i ! I I , 17 " " "'. " ,', " T',I." . , " " > . ,:' : j .,' ,', ",< " . I. "1",';" ., . .. <.., ",' ,..... ~: .f ": ,:' ~ 1 " ,.: 11. " , .'J' "'. ' , ' <,~,: I ;, '~e' ~. ~ i , , ' ::':' ~ ~ ., ' " ~ )~ " " . '..'r" . , ,'-:" , '. , " " . ~' , .~, ' :l~ ; , ;: " ',>" ;:,. ,,,', ~ ' t-: , :~;',I . ,. . " '~. \, ", \', : ',1.; ~' l ~ ~, ":" , , , \' , " I, CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-6 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 BUdget Lease Purchase of Major Capital Acquisitions ,Amends: Resci, nds : Reference: 1989/90 Service Options Manual Annual Budget Books Statement: When fiscally advisable and when consistent with contractual obligations. the City shall lease purchase all 'capital items which have a monetary value of at .least $25.000 and a minimum life expectancy of five years. The debt service on lease purchase items. shall be paid by the user department. ,; 18 :.! " .,.,. , ;~t:':, , .;r,,' .' ..' " " ;", \~~l~. ~/" ~.y~~1ii';~4"~~~""-_. ':> ., .,~ .~...~~~iW'~,-'!n"~, ~:'~~~~ ~S'.i.;'~~,.~:.,,~: :";fif~ ~;.~! :,i;!~'~i.;'~r. \1,' l;':~.r::', ", ;' :.4 ~,; ~'l::'~;4 :~: ;r;~<' L,".' , ! I , , , , I j i 1 \ :~ " l I , I . " " e, ,I. ~ ' Budget BG-8 CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 811/96 Amends: Reference: I,e' ;, ' I':, , .' . , , , , 1989/90 Service Options Manual 10/16/89 Work Session 4/8/96 Special Work Session , " Statement: :l: ',~, ' '., 1 ~.. . '.,' 20 ~\' '.;' 1..' !:, ~ ':5 I .;,...............,J:,',' ,~..J,.'.~.:.:.:..'.:_ < ,'<l'.~ I.........;,... .,<'." , ;)(p CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-8 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Budget 10 year Road Resurfacing Cycle & Drain Millage Amended: 3/19/92 8/1 /96 , Amends: ' Rescinds: Reference: 1989/90 Service Options MaRHa+ 10/16/89 Work Session 4/8/96 Special Work Session Statement: In order to maintain the City's streets in keeping with Clearwater's standards , the Commission will attempt to maintain a 10 year cycle for resurfacing roads ~ specific annual allocation of Ad Valorem revenues shall be used to fund the various acti~ities associated with roads and drainage. by allocating funds for this purpose in the annual budget process. Historical Notc: This millage was originally set at .307 mills in FY 1978 79. and had been revised annually to generate adequate revenues to maintain this program. In April 19B7, the City Commission adopted a policy to pro~ide that the annual Road & Millage levy shall be established at the level of .4693 mills until otherwise modified. This policy ~as futher amended by the Commission with the adoption of the 1990/91 Budget. Funding for drainage projects is provided by the stor~~ater fee. and a levy of .3864 is appropriatc for road projects. 20 ~ '1;" '..~~; , " .,~ ' . " " :'~' " , '". .T l' .;:' ~ "I .' .. ' .: :' :; i., ,I . 1 I , I , i i :'t ' ..., ' , ~ ';., ' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-IO Policy Statement' , ,General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 8/1/96 Budget PACT , Amends: . Resc; nds : Reference: 1989/90 Service Options Manual 4/8/96 Special Work SessioQ Stat,ement: A millage,levy necessary,to generate up to $400,000 per the agreement with the " Pe'rformi n9 Arts Center and Theatre (PACT) wi 11 be assessed and designated ,annually for the support of the Richard B. Baumgardner Center for the Performing Arts. and'Ruth Eckerd Hall. operating under the administration of PACT. Ioc. " \ 22 r~~iUJiliN.t~~.,..w~t~---."""~"""''''....<.u..fll-h'Co-l.o'' u_...!,.~" ~ . ~ T \' ') . , 1 J ~ ,~, '. .s I (1";\":': ,I ,.~..~' ': ~t'~d' ''';'':. ,I....... "",',"': ~,' , ;, ~> " ::-:,., \::", :', ': 'i.: ~ l,~, ' , ;" ' ~~.,:> , ~n.:';~.\ ' '\" ' ' .' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement No. BG -11 General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Budget Proprietary (Enterprise) Funds Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 1989/90 Service Options Manual /> " Statement: ::f'!.::'" ';::-t.'.' I' ",4 ' ....,.. . ; ~:: ~ J.. " ',' . i:k~';> ".' ).:,1' .. M':; ,;~~\ '. , -,,",:,:. ,. I ~~i~ ;' .:;:, ~ ,. ' ,.' '.\ . ' ~ e {_.It, .:.;;, ' " ,. i , f ~ ' :g:::,; . ::: " :,/ :' n I, ~ ,', , ", " ' ,.,.' ...'.,:'J':,: " "I'. , , ~, . . ~ ".. I ~ I , I } " ':..'. i ~ ':' :',:, " ~,i " \,.'.' ' . 'i~ ",e . ~~;"\ ',' ,.Hr , ,L ~, . .. lt' ...~.:,." J~':: ' ~.?{, " ,~;'~ . f:..:' , :~ >' ',All ,Proprietary (Enterprise) Fund operations shall be self-supporting, and shall pay administrative and qther ~ppropriate service charges to General Fund , Operations for support at a level determined by the City Commission. " -',', i', 23 ' 'J I I ~ ~ ) \ ' l , i ~~'1..r.I:;LdltJllll:t~~~~e_"". ,'~''"'':.'~'''''ilo....~l.~~-''II:.b',I,.......,i:I.J.\':)~V:~'~;''Ii-~'"" ,;i...,.;,.,.lh ~ ,,' '."~"';'e" .,.,. ,:I::,~,J-..," .....'; ; " " '" ~ CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-12 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 Budget Utility Transfer Payment Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 1989/90 Service Options Manual 10/16/89 Work Session Annual Budget Books Statement: ,\ I:', The Utility System shall annually transfer to the General Fund an amount determined appropriate to be considered reimbursement in lieu of taxes. 1:,< , April 1989 policy adopted by commissioners established this rate at 4.5% of ,prior-year gross revenues. This proportionate rate was adopted to accommodate growth, and replaced prior years' policy of a prescribed dollar contribution. HISTORICAL NOTE: , Fi sca 1 Year, ...L Doll ars 1990 4.5 1.772,870 1991 4.5 1. 987 .380 " 1992 4.5 2.050,000 " 1993 4.5 2.062.680 i" 1994 4.5 2,270.050 1995 4.5* 2 ,438. 620 1996 4.5* 2.587.770 1': z Note: Upon adoption of the Gas Strategic Plan in fiscal year 1993/94 , 1995/96. the Commission agreed to replace the Gas Support contribution with a , franchise fee from natural gas customer accounts payable to the General Fund, This. in combination with the Gas dividenp. offers the Genera) Fund the sam~ level of support as fiscal year 1995/96. maintain the same level for Gas as was adopted in the fiscal year 1992/94 operating budget. 24 /\. ,.\ ' .;' . " , 11~" , '. " .)>!~;~t,~\~>'<': "":,~'(~".~.JJ"";~~':t1'II~'~:'~~'I'.':.1,"'>:"'{.' ,. ~',~ 0::' ~". ",' .' ,. . . :::.~." .'. ' '~:- .: .~ : ~ i , ,',' L ..~' ;e. :,~' '" ;. ~ . . '" :1" .,~l . .. ~: ' ff,}, , .' kk, .':" .' !t~,;:, . I,'" . ~t:"~ '.' '. ' )I-t .. \~.~: :'. ~S~'~'," ;' ~:;;.,<',: :/.'. ~;~' " .-L ,~.~~:>' ", ','., \~~::: ,:: .... ,(;~ " .", fIr. '<: :", i,.\,>.. ......'" :",}, ":+ e+ ","\'" ~rf\.',::," . 0 ' ~i{~,.'.:,. ,'I' '< .~' ~0\:"'{":"'''':~ ;".'~, _' . ~:i,'." ': :r:y .': ,.'/ . A?'/ ' ',J "~;;.;." . ,t}: ,.', ~I~.~ , . ' . (V;: ,'. \l' , " . ,+:.;""" ....., ~4'i) , ' 1,./:......... (1:>\1"'" ': ..,' i~}'l?;\.>.,:: \: ,:':'., ',. '. __ 'I' '.. e"j BG-12 Cont. . With the adoption 'of the 1990/91 Budget. the Commission established an additional annual dividendtransfer.to the General Fund from the Gas Fund. This dividend.is to be ,one ha'~ the prior year net income of the Gas Fund. Fiscal Year , Do 11 a rs ' 1991 '1992 1993 1991' ,'. .1995 '.1996 119,680 371. 810 221.290 '.1.010.000 1.000 :000' 1.000.000 ", ~ , 'I .. . ' ,I .' . ,;, ~: '. . " ,.', "''"" '1 ..' 25 ',' .,.' ,) . I ',; I , ! , i I I I , i ~ " . :j I' I . 1 ! .0 . i j \ , , I j. , ! I l j j ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ft Y ,) ., .. /,\ ;i . t .' I' . ".~: ':';: , > e ~ .':- .,. ' 'j.~ 1,. >' I' :,'e' .' ' ik, I,"'. ' ~', .' e ", i, ' ,.' " . ,,' .'.' :,1:., I' ~' : ':'~:~ ~,'<: :;" : 1'..., "., 'i,.~d : ,t} .Ie' .;' . ;~ ;', . ' ., ' ~~i ~: -: ':"'. ~'/~ + !~': e' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-13 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Budget Interfund Administrative Charge Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 1989/90 Service Options Manual Statement: An allocation shall be made annually distributing the costs for administrative 'support departments' among all operating departments. This distribution shall be proportionately based on the operating department's annual bUdget. and shall not be charged to General Fund departments. , Note:' Upon adoption of the Gas Strategic Plan in fiscal year 1995/96. the Commission agreed to maintain the same charge for administrative support frQm the Gas Fund for fiscal year 1995/96 which will be increased annually by the cost of salary increase index computed by the City Manager (fiscal year 1996/97 - 4%). 26 '.," .igt:t-~;t~~~~iJd'~l,,*t\L..JJ.-o't..j~~"-""":' :-.-.....~.~.w,:J:i4.."~~....,l~:..,'f"'~.....;,~~..~,<~. '_,,; I.,'." , I ' \ \ ~-r , . :e:e :\,;:,!~,.. ,;~:~", :~\: . "i. :':'.';""::<"'.' '[ ",'~ d>, Jo""'a,~,....,:,..:..t!,:':"<,":' , , ,'M' . .' : ,,- .' i" i " 1:- I.: :.~ . : 1:< (' :'1 . ,. r ~ .', . .' , ,..,' " . !.'.<' ,~, . ;;:~): ," . :. ,~ ...' ~ , !,::'; l > /:.', .' ,{:/./ . i:~,~-: \' .' l(t~,,:,," 'iF:: :?".' >: ,; e' 'f , ~Ie :.' .. /.... ' .1'. "i' t:.. C. , : ~ '.' :J ' ' I'. ,~.~ :'," L"...,. .' . , "i, ~~:' ': . t~~. ' .~t '. J'" "1',; . ~ ,~: e ',,." I> ,- < ',q' ' <". ~:.-:' ..., ,J !~- , " . "'f .,., ~., , ~~;; < ' .....j.\, , \{,..., .' ..~ ~ " ' ~t,: ' )':;~,': , .. . .' Wt.'-'.'..;:: ~~'i:,,,,:" ' t,,',;. ' ~...: . , . !Jj: ;' ';1.1'. .: CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-14 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 . . Budget Interfund Other Service Charges Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 1989/90 Service Options Manual . Statement: '. The cost of services provided to Proprietary Fund Departments by General Fund Departments shall be charged ~o. and paid by the ,user department. . , ' " 27 .' ':',e 'e',' " :1' , " CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. 8G-16 Policy statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Budget Financial Support to Social Service Agencies Amended: 3/19/92 811/96 Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 1989/90 Service Options Manual 4/8/96 Special Work Session Statement: It is the The City's budget will include City.s policy to lend nominal financial support to selected' social service agencies to augment financial requirements; The budgeting of these funds shall be re evaluated every three years ,to determine if there is still a need for this s~pport and that the support is given to those agencies providing needed services to the citizens of Clearwater. Various reference materials and studies. such as the I Cope. will be made available to the City Commission to assist them in evaluating these agencies. Agencies receiving said support shall be gi\en notice of the re evaluation aRe what ;s expected of them in order to continue to receive the support. :1.', It'., ,. , . : , .~. ' 29 ~ '. tt: ": t' : . "J'" {V';, _\V~~\1:.','.~~IF,I.;-l!--,L;~_::'!.:,..!",;4"~'."'''''~'' ,............ ..w;..."......-:-J~....'I'A~\;.(.,.;.--,.f~.. , '~ ! ~ - e "I' i ') , , -/~ CLEARWATER CITY 'COMMISSION No. BG-17 Policy Statement General 'Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Budget CRA Contribution to General Fund ,', Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 'J. , . ~. 1989/90 Service Options Manual " ',' .' " Statement: .i> :.:' ;' , It is the Ci ty t s pol i cy that servi'ces provi ded for admi ni strati ve support to , ~he Community 'Redevelopment Agency (CRA) by City employees shall be reimbursed .to the Genera 1. Fund. ' Such rei mbursement sha" be approxi mate actua 1 costs incurred by the department. together with any'associated costs. I,'., ' ,,-., ;, (,: ' " " ~ " . . ' E 'I ~ , I' '.' \>. t' ' ~: ,e . .i '~. Note: This policy' will be revisited once the Development Director is hired and other issues regarding the Community Redevelopment Agency are addressed., } >,' ," , " \.'.', "~,I ?: ....,' '.' i .~'.' , ' " ~ ::.' ' ", " :. ' " ' , " J, ~ ,"; 30 .\ I ,. ')1' :'"', "', !t':. " ',',', ;.;., ,I ,"t~" e . :. ,} ':{" - f.:(1 " ",~' , 'il.W"~~~')Itfw..t.,.P~~-I..:lt.:oW!-t""';""--"'i''''I;.,.I--44~~,4:;~~:,~'~.:.-~"-;"t',,, +~" 'j,~~:' J;.. J,' "., .,":.... ~ ,.,., ',... : ' I . ,'.. ..,' ' ' ',' 'I .......~. ...,.... ~(tJ. .!,':f....i,.~.\'o:';<...r{...J~!~.~/~i.:.j..~ .';:~~'..l'., ' ~'; :,:, ;\1y:~_~___~:.'.n~~ ,I. ',. ':E, . ',,' ' , '. ., . " . ,'.1' ' ';~;;"/ :::: ~(;;::::I:" j'l;' ~ ':' ,~:'~<: ,: " ~.;;'w:' ,~:': .. ,/; , t:{::.:. /'11 . ~:/'S'::" ",.' , jl:.,.' ' )/~..'<~ . ~J:/, ";';.,' , ;:;t:..::., :..'. ", .. " . .' ~ '; , ' +J:, . f }~~,:' r ", l~L~>' t,' . jM< ' , ~;'~'.~" '. ,.,' , ~.r::~ i, t:/,~ ~ ' ,,', . t ~... " :~~;" , .;.' ~ " i:~i~<~ ~. J,: " H'" f :~.;; :. .. f/", I >t {;~f':.: ':: '.'i . 1,1, ~;j, ,::: :.:'., , " ;::~':' . " ~~.<.~' ,', ' '.', :;,~ }/'" ,': .',.',', ' , '. ~. >, ' ' '." .' <, ,,', Ii CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Genera 1 Topi c , Budget Amends: .' Statement: Health Policy Statement Subject: ranee Stabil'zation Fund No. BG-18 Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Reference: 11/17/88 Agenda Item #53 The. City Commission aut rizes the establ'shment of.a special health insurance stabilization fund to uardagainst future health care costs. I "e . i I' , ' . " , I' . \,' ' , . \ . it.'.;" "..'J'I ~ ,'\ ' , "", . . ~1.l~~Y~"-':"'~I' .. ......._----,--~--..-...~, <,' :, 31. , \ .. ,....--...._...I........n.~.;aj.......""~ll...t'.&....~ ..-.!'~~;, >ll\.r....,..L....,l,J-. ;<1.....' M -~.,'~ ,,,,"J',,;,' '1'''''' :~.;'I,~y.,...:.: -I;., 'I','" '~.:' " ".' <',';,::":: ':,:- ::;\'.:.: ;"';:~;';/";:'~/:::':,,""'-" .,,;' i ,J , " d-.~ " I" . CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-18 Policy Statement I. I,' ' General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 j BUdget, Health Insurance Stabilization Fund ,Amends: Rescinds: Reference: ~ 1 ~ ~ ! F ~ , " . , 11/17/88 Agenda Item #53 " 'r .,. '.. ': ,Statement: ' ': I e , ' " , The, City ,Commission authorizes the establishment of maintaining a special, :'::' , ' hea 1 th insurance stabil i zati on fund to guard aga i nst futur'e hea' th care costs. ,!:t: ..' ..'., ~X: ::,.~, ~ ~ ' ',' ',1, F' .- " " (: , '''',' , , , 'lJ ' . . {~ :, " ., . . ' .to"' ;; e ~:~: , ",:, . ' .1-," :1 ~' .'.. ~:.I ~,~ .: " ' S:, e ~, , 1,,; . . " ~ii.>. .': I,: ~Q::: : <' ;c " . 5'~ . ;::~ ",1", ~\:~:,":>,:,;:",::!:,'," , ~;,!:":,;':':,',.,:~,,, ' "'.,', , 1;J'l,.~.~'n .'Oot ':t'''.''1.~ ~,..... '" ~.: .' 31 , p .' ~'~~.,' ". .. - " - ,", . l'~ ,. ': .,. \." .. ,...' CLEARWATER CITY, COMMI$SION No. BG-19 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 10/18/93 BUdget Filling position of retired employees still ,on payroll Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 10/18/93,Minutes : Statement: :'," ~ . , ~..\:" . Upon review and approval of'the City Manager, a vacant position may be filled while the, former employee in that position remains on the payroll. The former, ,'employee's "salar'y" shall be paid from the Unappropriated Retained Earnings'in, , , the Geher~l Fund. ' ~.~~,:,. :' {c:: ~ :"~;:: ' '.- );;.' :/}, :" It ~: . ,. ", , ,J' 1:'\:, < l. , " (::. ,. :':i', ' ~, ..:: ' .,'_ I '. . " ' ~ ;. }1'., ",', ' ::..~;: .' -t'. . ., ;1' . ~ >~ 'I' /.1':.' ",: . .' . , ~ ' " " , ~ '. ~! . \ , ' ,Ki,:: ~'~: ,', "'11',' , ~l~~:,~{ ~.~:\ ~' 32 'lJ" , :.' ,.. ' ..,', i I~~L, ....... :\~:~;~~. , :~:.t' "I ' ~ft"rMIi,1"I,..:,f..'...,..,'.F+-.",..:j~:~~:~i~~.....'..'" . '-"'---~... ..._.....'~-t,. ~ .o_____..._..,. - '.-.- ,~; , . , .i ,,' '~. ' ,:,1 ,-' , ..rt ,0, \.. '. ~~::. ". " .' :" ',,~'.'. ;', '(> , tj~,~.,':;,. ...,' ' ~:l ';" ;, I. " I . " ' , ....[... . 'I' .. I.:~:f ~ '"t ~ . .., f. r., ' It...,. :i; ,:., ' , f~' : ~.: r',' , :;:::.: ~, ~:~ . , ,! '~ .' 'l',. ....'.. ('.!, vr ~'. ' . of;', ~~:~:'.,. , .- 1". r ,I,..', ;. ~ ' \:.'e', ~:..; "'. .:..", . ~ , ' .)0;'. '.' . ("r~'. ' ' , ,~,"+,,' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement ,. No. BG-2Q General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 12/15/92 Budget . . Pilot/Seed Programs 'Amends: Resci nds :. Reference: 12/15/92 Goal Setting Minutes Statement:. ' When establishing and providing funding for Pilot/Seed programs a set period of time for such program shall be getermined. The length of time will be , '., determi ned on a' case-by-case basi s. . I f. ,." ' , ' , , 33 , ,: > 'I ~ ! " " ! , I r i . , . ..... ',>' t, {, < ,,~~ ':: L . ,,'.-.< ;- . ",' , ,. . ." ~' u e " NEW CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. BG-21 , Policy Statement .,1. General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 7/18/96 " .k< Budget' Review of Rate Schedules " , , ,>'. 1,':-' , ,'~ends: 'Rescinds: Reference: "" ,', " , 4" , 7/18/96 Commission Meeting i:;;' ~', I ~; . ': I" , ~ '~' ~: i . Statement:' , 'j ': '.. " :..',:,.:' e Rate 'schedules of the City of Clearwater,will be reviewed every 5 years. The " purpose of the revi ew wi 11 be to assure' rates a re set in a manner to be fa i r and equi tab 1 e while c~veri ng the City's cost to provi de the servi ce. I';;, ': ' .'. , ' ':l'",: ' ,I"'. " I',:,:'" ' l". ~'. ' J\:''-:': ' '/,<, ~;~?:', ' (,:, , , I",,', ' ~.' , ". " .'" "..: >" ):' '-', "". ' ~: I " T, I. :. ~, ' ,~;.>, ' r.'" ' ! 6~:~', .,.' , '., ' ; l~ ~ ~, .;:, : ~ :.~.... \' , .... ' , . ., )' '.. t . .' y~:, '~ ::',1' +: >, ,;'.'" " , ' "', > :~',; . . .', ~::'"l. ,. '.'. " ~ ,,', .- ~1;;,,:: .: t, :~~, ' , I' \ ' '.',\'i. I " , ,~." .' ,~~": ' ~:::~:;'c'-:,' ,: :, '~i": . . ~y::' . .' ::', e <<:: ' r.f ' , ....~...i~:;.~~.~t.).W;:;::-:'t'''''v.v-...;~~......u,- '~. -'....~'~~~.,;........t"......~,' ,'-'-....,~' ....~'\ .. , ,.... .~ .... '.' 34 ,', , ..~,~~~~..;." :'-:<: ' :'::~~ ~'~"I".. :-.~. 1"-:-, ~ ,....~;''.. '., '~I/' ',~~ ", ~: , ." " I .> +' ~..... I '.' , .;,' '. ;~;~::~ ~, '. ~'r '~'e ~,~ " . {~'~ j';':,. . ~~/': ,::, ~ ~ ' , , " .~!. , << , , I n;".~. ;f.-{.", ;~i , ... '" , . .. , " , ,~~~~>'~,:, ' , -l'L\~\., ' > t:~... ,'.-':-.... .~~~{.> " . ;~}.::::'~. . .$~:':.> <~~f' '" : '). ,i <' ~' ~,l..:: , '" > :';"i: ,.... i ,', I t~~, ,'. '. .r' , " !i:~f.: . ~Pfi ' ~:;. .",Ji./, , i i ;~41<': ", e , '. 'f ~ \" > ~l:~," ,: . " I, ~ " .' ',' {~:,::' ' ., , , ,.' ~ .r \ ~;<n. ,~.. :. ~~L"'. '.' ~.." I' ~' , I~~( .'.~. .:. ,: ,'~ t'l'L~ ~ , ' ' -!1t/, :'::':.. '< ~'\. ' ,. ,'.' ' , ."~ .," : i ' " .1 NEW CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION. Policy Statement .1 ., . ",1 , '. , No. BG-22 .General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 8/1/96 Budget . Review of Annual Audit Amends: Rescinds: " Reference: 5/6/96 Special Work Session ,Statement: :' A work. se'ssion wlll be'.held each year within, 60 days of the release of the , '. ,,~ e annuaJ. flnancialaudit of the'City.At that'time, the over all financial cond{tion.o,f..thEfCityand its enterprise funds will be reviewed. , ":. r , '. " ~ ; <. ,(I ': ", . .' (, , .. .1' " ,. , , ~' . ' .; " ',.. I '.\ ' .' , . 35 , . , , t , I 1 i ~ \ " " j , i ; . : .( 1t ;~ ~ " ~.~/ - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CC-1 Policy Statement General Topic City Commission Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 8/1/96 Departing Commissionerst Gifts Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 2/19/81 Agenda Item 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 5/6/96 Special Work Session Statement: '. ~ , " , Guidelines for Gifts ~ to departing CommissioneP& members are established as follows: ':" ~:? , Less than one full term: Plaque. name plate. letter. gag gift. caricature '" , One full term: Plaque. name plate. ring. gag gift. caricature letter. Pewter Tray with Seal. Commission pictures ;,; Two cons~clJtive full terms: Plaque. name plate. ring. collage. letter. gag gift. caricature fax machine or City watch. Commission pictures Three or more ~on$ecutiv~ full tp.rms (Commission and Mayor): Plaque. name plate. ring. collage or album. tray with seal. letter. gag gift. caricature '. The above are guidelines. Departing gifts shall be chosen in consultation with the outgoing members. The value of the gifts shall be: a maximum of $300 for one full term: $500 for two full terms and $~OO for more than two full terms. L :': .' ", 35 , ' '.,' . ! ' 'i'".f"" " < : :'. ,',' " ! ' ",' , , > ~' . . ,;~(, ~,~ ~~ .,~. ~, , "\.' h'" I '" ' ,~ ' . (: ~~ \ '" r"Anu^TER '-11 vl..l..Ml\nM ... General Topic Travel Amends: .' Statement: 'I' ,. No. CC-2 Policy Statement Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 Reference: 1/1/84 Work Session 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 10/16/87 Work Session 5/17/93 Work Session i 'I j I I i , I \ The City Commission will ollow the provisions f the City's Travel Code. Chapter 2. Administrati . Article IV. Any travel outside the Tampa Bay area by the Mayor Commissioners for any City'business where t'e City pays the cost must be ap oved by a majority vote of the Commission. he only exceptions to this rule ar the Florida League of Cities and, when he d in Florida. the National League of ities conferences. Note: ' The City Tn vel Code tracks the State law as current written. An amendment to spec fically provide for this is being drafted ~ich will make it unnecessary to c ange the City Code when and if the State law changes. See attached City Travel Code and Charter Section regarding compensation and expenses '\ : I l , 36 " . ADMINISTRATION Sec. 2.328., Use of privately owned vehicles. (1) The use of privately owned vehicles for offi. cial travel in lieu of publicly owned vehicles or common carriers may be authorized by the agency head if a publicly owned vehicle is not available. Whenever travel is by privately owned vehicle, . the traveler shall be entitled to a mileage allow. ance at a fIXed rate not to exceed the rate per- mitted by F.S. f} 112.061(7)(d). Except for the mileage allowance, tolls and parking fees, reim- bursement for expenditures related to the oper- ating, maintenance and ownership of the vehicle shall not be allowed when privately owned vehi. cles are used on public business. (2) All mileage shall be shown from point of origin to point of destination and, when possible, shall be computed on the basis of the current state road department map. (3) Monthly private auto allowance may be given to employees under certain circumstances. Such allowances may be submitted for approval by the department director in the normal budget process. Employees receiving private auto allow- ance shall keep records justifying the receipt of these funds. These records will be released to the department or ~ity manager upon request. (Code 1980, f} 27.08: Ord. No. 5210, ~ 1, 6.18.92) Sec. 2.329. Reimbursable incidental trav. eling expenses. The following incidental traveling expenses of the traveler may be reimbursed: (1) Taxi fare; (2) Ferry fares and tolls for bridges, roads and tunnels; (3) Storage or parking fees; (4) Communication expense; (5) Gratuities. (Code 1980, ~ 27.09) .l, './':, ~ ., ,':. .~. _ ._e\J ~ ", ... M' .., ~ .,' . r f 2.332 Sec. 2.330. Convention registration fees. Convention registration fees paid by a traveler while attending a convention or conference which will serve a direct public purpose with relation to the public agency served by the person attending such meetings are reimbursable. (Code 1980, ~ 27.09) Sec. 2.331. Travel vouchers required. The uniform travel voucher form will be used by all officers, employees and authorized persons when submitting traveling expense statements for approval and payment. No traveling expense state- ment shall be approved for payment unless made on the prescribed form. AIl travel vouchers must be completed and submitted to the finance depart- ment no later thBn; 15 days after completion of travel. (Code 1980, f} 27.11) Sec. 2.332. Fraudulent claims. Any claim authorized will contain a statement that the expenses were actually incurred by the traveler as necessary traveling expenses in the performance of his official duties and shall be ver. ified by a written declaration that the statement is true and correct as to every material matter. Any person who willfully makes and subscribes any such claim which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, or who willfully aids or assists in, procures, counsels or advises the preparation or presentation under the provisions of this section of a claim which is fraudulent or is false as to any material matter, whether or not such falsity or fraud is with the knowledge or consent of the person authorized or required to present such claims, shall be punished accordingly. Any person receiving an allowance or reimbursement by means of a false claim shall also be civj])y liable in the amount of the over.~payment made thereby. (Code 1980, ~ 27.101 CD2:37 f 2.321 CLEARWATER CODE Traveler means a public officer, public employee or authorized person when performing authorized travel. (Code 1980, fi 27.01i Ord. No. 6210, fi 1,6.18.92) Crollll reference-Definitions and rules orconBtrucUon gen. erally, f 1.02. Sec. 2t322. Authority to i~cur travel expense. (1) All travel must be authorized and approved by the city manager and the head of the agency from whose funds the travel expense is paid. 1:, (2) Travel expense shall be limited to those ex. penses necessarily incurred in the perfonnnnce of a public purpose authorized by law to be per- formed by the agency and must be within the limo itations prescribed by this section. i, (3) Travel expense of public employees for the 80le purpose of taking merit system or other job placement examinations, written or oral, shall not be allowed under any circumstances, except that upon prior written approval of the agency head, candidates for executive or professional positions may be allowed such travel expense pursuant to this section. (Code 1980, ~ 27.02) Sec. 2.323. Omcial headquarters. The official headquarters of an officer or em. ployee assigned to an office shall be the city. (Code 1980, ~ 27.03) Sec. 2.325. Rates of subsistence allowance. (a) Subsistence. All travelers may be allowed subsistence when perfonning authorized travel re.- quiring absence from the official headquarters overnight, in amounts equal to the amounts per. mitted by F.S. ~ 112.061(6), at the per diem rate or, if actual expenses exceed the per diem rate, the amounts permitted for meals plus actual ex. penses for lodging at a single occupancy rate, to be substantiated by paid bills therefor. (b) Meals only. All travelers may be allowed subsistence while on authorized travel outside the official headquarters but not requiring absence from the official headquarters overnight, in amounts equal to the amounts permitted by F.B. ~ 112.061(6}. (c) Reimbursement. No traveler shall be reim. bursed for any meal or lodging included in a con. vention or conference fee or otherwise paid by the city. (Code 1980, ~ 27.05; Ord. No. 5210, ~ 1, 6.18.92) Sec. 2.326. Route, method of travel. (1) All travel must be by a usually traveled route. When it is by an indirect route for the trav. eler's personal convenience. any extra cost is to be borne by the traveler and reimbursement for ex. pense shall be based only on such charges as would have been incurred by a usually traveled route. (2) The agency head shall designate the most economical method of travel for each trip, keeping in mind the following conditions: (a) The nature of the business; (b) The most efficient and economical means of travel, considering the time of the traveler, cost of transportation and per diem or sub. sistence required; (e) The number of persons making the trip and the amount of equipment or material to be transported. (Code 1980. ~ 27.06) Sec. 2.327. Travel by common carrier when paid for by traveler. Transportation by common carrier when trav. cling on official business and paid for personally by the traveler shall be substantiated by a receipt therefor. Federal tax shall not be reimbursable to the traveler, except when unforeseen circum. stances require that travel arrangements must be paid for by employees, and then only after ap. proval of the city manager. (Code 1980, ~ 27.07) CD2:36 ADMINISTRATION spouses in excess of $1,000.00, excluding there. from a home mortgage, motor vehicle or boat mort. gage and any retail charge accounts. (2) Every city officer or city employee~ required by this section to file a disclosure statement, shall file such statement relative to the previous cal. endar year no later than 12:00 noon of July 15 of each year, inc1udingthe July 15 following the last year he is in. office. The f\rst statement required by this section shall be med within 15 days of the date this division becomes effective. Succeeding statements shall be med on the date set out in this section. Every city officer or city employee, mentioned in subsection (1) of this section who is appointed shall me the required disclosure state- ment within 30 days after the date of appoint- ment. '(3) In addition to any other penalty provided in this division, if any individual designated by this section fails to comply with this section, such failure shall be deemed nonfeasance in office. (4) The disclosure statements required by this section shall be public records within the meaning of F.S. fi 119.011. (Code 1980, fifi 23.9, 23.10) Sec. 2.310. Civil remedy available. (1) Violation of any of the provisions of this di- vision, including but not limited to any failure to file disclosures, in addition to any criminal pen. alty shall subject the violator to a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000.00 or restitution of any pe- cuniary benefits received because of the violation committed. (2) The civil penalty provided for in this section shall be recoverable by and shall accrue to the city in a civil action brought by the city. (Code 1980, ~ 23.11) DMSION 4. TRAVEL Sec. 2.321. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this division, shall have the meanings os- f 2.321 cribed to them in this section, except where the context clenrly indicates a different meaning: Agency and public agency mean the city and any officer, department, agency, division, subdi. vision, board, bureau, commission, authority and any other separate unit of government of the city. Agency head and 'head of the agency mean the highest policy-making authority of a public agency . Authorized person means: (a) A person other than a public officer or em. ployee, whether elected or not, who is au- thorized by an agency head to incur travel expenses in the performance of his official dutiesj (b) A person who is called upon by an agency to contribute time and services as con. sultant 01' advisorj (c) A person who is a candidate for an execu- tive or professional position. Authorized travel means travel on official busi- ness of the city, including but not limited to travel to a convention or conference serving a direct public purpose for the benefit of the public agency, when approved by the agency head. Common carrier means a train, bus, commer- cial airline operating scheduled flights; and rental cars of an established rental car firm. Employee and public employee means an indi. vidual other than an officer or authorized person who is filling a regular or full-time authorized position and is responsible to an agency head. Officer and public officer means an individual who in the performance of his official duties is vested by law with sovereign powers of govern. ment and who is either elected by the people, or is lawfully serving instead of such an elected indi. vidual as initial designee or successor. Travel expense means the usual, ordinary and incidental expenditure necessarily incurred by a traveler. Travel period means a period of time between the time of departure and time of return. CD2:35 . Section 2.04. Compensation and expenses. The commission may determine the annual sal- ary of commissioners and the mayor-commission- er by ordinance, but no ordinance increasing such salary shall become effective until the date of com- mencement of the tenns of commissioners elected at the next regular election, provided that such election follows the adoption of such ordinance by at least six months. Commissioners shall receive their actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties of office. Section 2.05. Mayor-commissioner, func- tions and powers. The mayor-commissioner shall preside at all meetings of the commission, perform such other duties consistent with the office as may be im- posed by the commission and this charter and shnll have a voice and a vote in the proceedings of the commission, but no veto power. The mayor-com- missioner may use the title of mayor in any case in which the execution oflega! instruments in writ- , ing or other necessity arising from the general laws of the State of Florida, the statutes or exec- utive orders oftlle government of the United States, or this charter so require; but this shall not be considered as conferring upon the mayor-commis- sioner administrative duties except as required to carry out the responsibilities stated in this char- ter. The mayor-commissioner shall be recognized as the official head of the city by the courts for the service of process, by the governor for purposes of military law, and for all ceremonial purposes. At the second evening commission meeting in April of each year, the commission shall elect one ofits members as vice-mayor. The vice-mayor shall act as mayor-commissioner during the temporary absence or inability of the mayor-commissioner to perform the duties of the office of the mayor. (Ord. No. 4768, ~ 1,1-19-89/3-14-89; Ord. No. 5758- 95, ~ 2, 1-19-95/3-14-95) Section 2,06. Prohibitions. (a) Appointments and removals. Neither the commission nor any of its members shall in any manner dictate the appointment or removal of any Supp. No. 10 ';:.~~'I'r/~-:" ,~....",J"~II' .. ~, . I." CHARTER ~ 2.07 city administrative officers or employees whom the city manager or any of the city manager's subor- dinates are empowered to appoint. (b) Except for the purpose of inquiries and in- vestigations, the commission or its members shall deal with city officers and employees who are sub- ject to the direction and supervision of the city manager solely through the city manager, and nei- ther the commission nor its members shall give orders to any such officer or employee, either pub- licly or privately. It is the express intent of this charter that recommendations for improvement in city operations by individual commissioners be made to and through the city manager. Nothing in the foregoing paragraph is to be con- strued to prohibit individual members of the com- mission from closely scrutinizing by questions and personal observations all aspects of city opera- tions so as to obtain independent information to assist the members of the commission in the for- mulation of sound policy. (c) Holding other office. No present or former commissioner shall hold any compensated appoint~ ive city office or employment until one year after the expiration of the term for which such commis- sioner was elected. (Ord. No. 4768, ~ I, 1-19-89/3-14-89) Section 2.07. Vacancies; forfeiture of office; filling vacancies; advisory boards. (a) Vacancies. The office ofa commissioner shall become vacant upon the death, resignation or re- moval from office in any manner authorized or ' required by law or forfeiture of the office, such forfeiture to be declared by the remaining mem- bers of the commission. (b) Forfeiture of office. A commission member shall forfeit such office if such member: 1. Lacks at any time during the term of such office any qualification for the office pre- scribed by this charter or by law, or 2. Is convicted of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, or CHT:7 :, ~ '.' , < ~ . < ~ : ~ " " .' 'M:' ",~, ,~ ., 'QcP Cl.EARWATER'CITY COMMISSION No. CC-2 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Travel' Commission Travel Amended: 3/19/92 8/15/96 Amends: ' Rescinds: Reference: ~ .; 1/1/84 Work Session 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 10/16/87 Work Session 5/17/93 Work Session 8/12/96 Work Session .1 ' Statement: ' " ',,' The City Commission will follow the provisions of Sec. 2.04 of the Charter and , the City's Travel Code. Chapter 2. Administration. Article IV., " I" '. ~ ,; . '.' Any travel outside the Tampa Bay area by the Mayor or Commissioners for any City business where the City pays the cost must be approved by a majority vote of the Commission. The only exceptions to this rule are the Florida League of Cities and. when held in Florida. the National League of Cities conferences. l ':, ~ '.;, Note: The City Travel Code tracks the State law as currently written. An amendment to specifically provide for this is being drafted which will make it unnecessary to change the City Code when and if the State law changes. : i ; , t..'.' ~~\ . " 'I;,,: , , i,~' ,'co' , ;'. " ,,' .:: ' ) I, I> I' , ['.: I'" I ~I' (, " I ,~ " , 37 ! ~.~ ;':' :.~-;' " ... '~, :-;',' .; 't' i. ' ..' . ' 1II~,;,..\ii.l."'fuJl.~~jJ'''''''''''''-'~-;' ,....,-..............,.,-"""",;~.:;-~". '",.\,'. . ."'.' , ....' .:<:,' J' ~ .. ~ ~ .. > - .' ,l'. " .. ,. . ,.~ ,. ~ ~,:'. ':.'~ ' . If "' , .,: I i ~ , f r . CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION ~o. CC-4 . Policy statement General, Topic City Commission Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 8/1/96 Fund Raisers I : . Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 4/16/84 Work Session 5/6/96 Special Work Session . , Statement: ' it 'shall be' at the discretion of individual Commlssioners whether or not to accept invi"tations to fund raising' activities. Expenses incurred by acceptance are not reimbursible. +he City ~ill not accept 'invitatio~s to fund raiscrs'nor will employees will not attend these functions as City representatives. j. . ~: r }e.' , :\. . '.. .' 38 i:' " ;/ ,e :t, :':' . ,', /. " . Y~r , ~.' , ~':l~ , '. - ~ f;', , IT~~"'i;':~l~~~""N--r~~~~j."I"("'~~!~.\;';,,:<~~;j~~I;~'h" :";(":;:, .:,::~:,~-:.,.,:.~;,:;;',~.~:\<~. <'_':C~'~ :,.::",,'~ ,.....:, .; \. ::':.' ~ .~ ',~ '~' -! ;". "', " '.' " .~ .', t., . , 1 :r' ,~.! .. , ',<, :; I" ' ;: ',. , , l'; , ',; " " , , ' , , , , ' , /:' ,e ~/- . \ HI" " ?e1" ' " CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CC~5 Policy Statement General Topic Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Subject: City Commission Citizen Inquiries - Responses Amended: 3/19/92 8/]/96 Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 4/30/84 Work Session 5/6/96 Special Work Session Statement: In responding to citizen inquiries. the City Manager shall respond to letters in writing and may respond to telephone calls by return call. Letters or telephone calls addressed to 'the ,City Commission shall be answered by the City Manager. aAd/or the. Mayor, ,8 Commissioner or an appropriate staff person as may be designated. by the City ,Manager or Mayor. Copies of correspondence sent to the Commisslon wi" indicate by whom the response will be' prepared. , ~ Copies of responses will be made available upon request. 39 . ~~1f~Ct:~~'eI-o.I,c;r';-.r""'~4-. .........J-r"...'~........ 'J-'''''J1~'1'''''1-! --'lv....,...:~....,"".t., 6.i,t',,: T'\-.> , :" 7' . .. ' \,', ' .1': ":, <_ ,r: ' , . ,e CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CC-6 . Policy Statement General Topic Subject~ Date Adopted~ 1/16/90 Amended: 8/1/96 City Commission Staff Projects Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 6/5/85 CC Meeting 5/6/96 Special Work Session Statement: , ' 'Staff projects for Commi~eners, requiring more than eight hours of work, must be approved by a majority of the Commission. ",:' . ' A Commission member shall request staff research or projects only through the City Manager or City Attorney in accordance with the City Charter. Any ,request that: in the determination of the City Manager or City Attorney. will ~a~e longer than 8 hours must be approved by a majority of the Commission. " ' ,', ~'.i, " "." , . " ., , , ~: i . 40 I'.> , , f' ;,,".: ... ~~~~~!<~"'\~ .:\;,; t'J,,+.I.)prlJ~'ziooo .....e.. - . '.~'*~~..'~....~~ :~~~~"'---~~ , , , ' ','. ~ .., ',',,', :,:,:~,:,":J~:; :;, i' ,: e - ,>... ! ,,":' :(' .. '.,'.e, , I .1 ( ~. , " ')1 ~ ,,:.j '. '" ,~ ,. , '1',' ,\l,~', ' h. 'I,,' ',' ,.<'" 'i-' " ;, ' ,,' '. " . ,,' " '~ . ~. e , ":,:',: ,", , ti.:,.,: ' ~r~:.::.~. {V'~ .,; ~;:;.,. ^' , ~:;': p.. . '.<., ~. ~ ' 'tl:.e, , ,. ...~' , < ::1-( ~' , , " ',' "<' f.,~' .,' . >, ! ~'. e....'_ ' "I.. '. ;;~t ", 1~'. ~'L;- '( ~~\ " ,1~~i: ' , " ,1~~': ,:':":' r:~~" '. :~. '" ;~~~'" .' ~ 'l'~i ;:"i." ~j:t:.. e '~{,~:~<;' ;', 'I \. "':1 , :~>~.'.> ;. , " ' ;~f.::,'~' ,,'..'. :, ' :i::.,j\, ,e> "l' ': ' , . ;~rr',~', ='l" . .:, _I.' '. (?:'e:' '" ;'~~~::,'I:~. " t1,~{~"\ J ' : ',: , I ~ ,. re :: ;':'-"<~:."~~'.~'.~~.:;f> :::~:,'t~, n ."~:.,: CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION ~ , . " e ", . , , , , No, CC-8 po11cy Statement General Topic Ci~y Commission Subject: Resolutions Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amends: Reference: Rescinds: 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session i ! i f , I i Statement: , An individual Commissioner may request a resolution. However. prior to preparation'of,the resolution. there must be a consensus majority of the COIMl"ssion members agreeing to do so. ,I ' I t: :' . , ""I'..;' , , , , . }'., ' ~'.',.', . ' 1,..,":' : !.,' . (.:.. . '.' ~. ;. ./ '~~;:>;::"; l"1: I~'I~,', 1X:":".. ".~,', . .t.:.' : ',\ ,.~. . , [f-?;.....::-, ':',:"1 ;c.... F>.. '.' , ':" . ;, i~;.' . .'-. .. i;~:~::, ~.. " ,", '. ~;::;<"'; . ",'I' . ;'..'.... ' :~~~.-: '; . ' , . ' '.:lr~' ,I : , .;.-,' ~;;~<; !r~i:~~; , ::..~.~~ i;.t~.:,'. , c~.~ .' , :';:'.:;:': . :.1'/, ~ 'iJ;~; 'f ':i.],~: , ,"<: '. ~~\l::< " ~ .- ::(.;. ') . i~ ;..' (' , . ~. .' '.~ . \ I'. ";fL< ':-~ '+,' . . -I"'~., ~ D'" " .,~ .. (, . I CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement ., ". No.' CC-9 General Topic Subject: . Date Adopted:' 1/16/90 City Commission Annual Dinners Amends: Rescinds: Reference: . ' . Statement: " , Newly elected Commission,rnembersshall.be invited to the Annual Phillies and .. Advi sory. Board d1 liners. ; . , . ':';',.,:.", /'.1 . , ~~{," 42 . . ,~'.'e 0' ' t',):., ~. ' :~, ,~..': ',. e '~ ' ~ 'I" .t. ,,;,' , J;~,;~~f/:": .- .t:.' ,." ' , .' it<\.:"':. .' ~'J\li".,.,.....,'t~.""'~"tl.r"""fl'..t~t'I>.-i''''''''-o,.i''''' ., ~ "___.~:,,~.___rE."""'TO. ,".' .._....*-_h;.._....',~.' :'h.,' j.:."'.' . "r" ~ , , I I , ...~ " ~ ~.~ e ~ . , . . .. 'J '- I ;, , ; , . ;, i I. . \ . ! t t , , ~. . I: ' .:{, 0 ;;,~~':. , , " , i~:,~ (' . ~ ' ,1 -, CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CC-IO Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 City Commission Proclamations , ,Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 5/22/86 CM Office Memo 3/21/96 Commission Meeting " I I , ' '}.T, "~'M ' ""'." :;':',: , Statement: :;.', ,';, ~ .' , joe: . ., ~ < ..,' . ".', ' ')', ' ~ ,,; ,. ". ", ,..' ~ ~,l :' '~;I " . ~. " - " , ~' I ;i: ' ';;~\:' l ,',., > 1\', , , ':l~::, . ,: '>, ;,:::'T-: . ~I ' , , r ,t;',' , ::1' ' ~"~ , , , 'I'. .' '~'z. I '. .'. ! ", " t.... " " " , , ' , , ".', . ,.:~'I, ' ~.<' l , ,''i ' ."'\ f,r:,'o ., ;~,..' ' ,; , :U"::,, ' ~. :1;: The'City of Clearwater will consider issuing proclamations from all segments ,of the community without regard to gender. race.,ethnicity or handicap. , , , The C; ty of Cl ea rwater wi 11 not issue proc 1 amat ions to compani es, II for prof; t II , organizations. profit making agencies. political organizations or religious organizations; i ' I I , l, , .t i ' i i t I ~ ! i ) , t '~.. 43 ~ I I , ~:., ' \'. . ..... ;;:;, d, ' ,; /:...' .. . " ". ,~.' ~ . , ' ,~. " ' . r ~ ' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CC-12 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/2/96 Work Session City COlTlTlission Letters stating positions Amends: Resci nds: ' Reference: j : '. ~ '.. 1/2/96 Worksession !..'.:. , . I' I:'. j,,,, Statement: . " ~: ' When writing letters stating a position. a Commission member may state the position is that of the Commission only.after having discussed and gotten majority agreement of the Commission regarding the position. If not discussed and agreed to;by the majority of the Commission, the letter must clearly state theposltion stated is that of the individual Commission member. ~. , " I ~.' '~l .. ' '. . ">+ , :, . , . .,'.< ~. ' , '!'..:L . . ,,' '.' ~" ! ,", " t I '(I." " " .' ' ;,; F .'{ , ," '. . '" .'.i.', . ~.,' , 46 .~. ':..::' " :,,,, " r...': .' ,',' :.::' ' .' ~ . .:,fr;.... t. ," '\.~~::, ' ,.;:~..~ :'1 , ".... fjy:&!hi~:tfjP1/o;1;~rM~"""-'~'" ..~-.............,~'...~..~I\~:~.;:.l:{i':'; '. . ^; r ''- ;. elo, ' . . ~ '. , .', " ., ~, ' ,;~:,,: ':, ,~ ,I .. , ,', "..- ;' \::' 1-,':..', ,;' . :"-'J", . ~':~.:.' :' r.~, ~/~'V: ,,';: , ~.~ , ',~ ~. ~, : ~ ~':..;'> '" < ~:~r~, ", IY~' , j~~:;::: ' ~~'. ' , ~:i~.'..: I . [r ,. , , .' , , , , , ", "". ' .I~ ~ e',' '" ,~, i u. ~ .' , ' 1'.", ' . Ih , '~I' ,} ,'I'" , .,l.' '~." , ;,; ~'.' l . . ~....: . j'....;' '!~\l~;': ,>' ,., f'" ,. :~~;~: " , . .,' , , ~ , ~.f: ' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CC-13 Policy Statement General'Topic Subject: Date Adopted: City Commission Representation on Boards ! \ , , " Amends: Rescinds: Reference: ' Statement: , ,Whenever possible. a Commission member appointed by the Commission as its , representati~e on a board or committee (PPC. MPO, etc.) will receive , Commission input prior to taking a position regarding issues coming before that board~ If not possible to obtain Commission input. the Commissioner is to act to the best of their ability in the City's interest. I' I i \ ~< , ' , ," 46 .. , ., ..) : e', " ',. , 'j",' ,. ~ > " " NEW CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CC -14 Policy Statement Genera' Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 4/15/96 City Commission. Televising Commission Meetings Amends: ' Rescinds: Reference: \ . 4/15/96 Work Session . , , ' ~', . Statement':' All regular City Commission meetings and Work Sessions will be televised on C- View. Efforts wi.ll be made to also televise specially scheduled meetings and , work sessions. However, there will be times when this is not possible, or practical, No closed door attorney/client or bargaining sessions will be televised. "~'I I \ 1 ! -i ! ~ ~ ' (, ' \ ~ ': i,'" I;,:, ' < I'~.. . , , \" , ~ " I ,'" .' :'" ' " ,. 'i:;',:::', ,,' 48 ': ': .. 1 '. l' !r::-:' . .. ' .' 1i~.:::J:-'!;:v~:",:\...:.,.;...".,;;_"o::d;...."J."U""",,__""L ro_-_~W''\Irtt-iA~~~~.~~"""e. ";.';..~i.T. " " ,'. .' ,'. ~~~~~~"'M'!'tft",~ ' . " "e .' ~ .i-d.J.-i_"''I:,';,''~!jd'''~1 J1,.-~'~ ,~<_~:.=-._:7 " , ,~ '. ,. , ,. e' ~ 'i' ,. ,~ '; /': e'-' f: "':.">/ {~~, ..~ ' . " i ,: " ::e, >,: ;" r. ' " ':'. .. I' ~ ~ . , " ' OJ I' ...~ ~, . :\'.-: ~l" , ,,,~;' .: ',:. ~r';<~ , :~ '. ~ .~:. ~,~ . :"1 ", "-I <:. !'j ;":. '~< ~ ' ,t>:'"" , 1 !" ' " ~;~.:. ' t ":.e, .f:. . \", e\ " ;..':: : 1,"',~;; , r:' ~' ........ ' ',' '.:',' "..I '..:' , , " ,f,. '"\;' '<1' '. ~... ' , ~~~>, ' .~ \,' , ' ~" ' ~ ,',. '. ~ J ,...,. "~ ., . , ".. .' X,~:I . :;~);,:" ':":':,,,,' ,,~ ' . .~~ . > " ~ ',t, ~ff': /~'i; ':::...." .'. I .' 't "- ,...t. ,".... ,: 'f' " I' NEW 'CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement ,No. CC-15 General Topic Subject: , Date Adopted: 8/1/96 City Commission Information available to Public & Press Amends: Rescinds: ,Reference: Statement: ' 4/8/96 Special Work Session , ' All materi a 1 prepa r'ed by the Ci ty Manager and the Ci ty Attorney for the Commission shall be provided to the press and to the public via a special box in the City Clerk's Department. Reports shall be made available in the Clerk's Department .for the public to review. , ' <, 49 , .;. I I \ , , , , " ) i I \ j \ ' \ f \ ' j , NEW CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CC-16 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 4/8/96 City Commission Distribution of Commission Mail Amends: Reference: Rescinds: 4/8/96 Special Work Session Statement: All mail to the Mayor-Commissioner and the Commissioners arriving 'at City Hall received pursuant to the law or in connection with the transaction of official business by the City of Clearwater shali be copied as follows: A. , .. B. C. Each Commission member will receive the original of items addressed to them whether anonymous or not. Copies of everything will be made for the City Clerk Department, the Legal Department. and the public information file. Mail will be delivered to the Commission at least once per week. On days mail is not delivered. incoming mail will be faxed to each Commission member. , , Other anonymous letters and suggestions will not be distributed. Publications and lengthy agenda materials for other boards upon which the Commissioners serve will not be copied. Only the agendas will be circulated. Items of considerable length (such as petitions) will not be copied. but instead a memo will be distributed announcing the availability of the item in the office. D. Mail with the vlOrds similar to "Personal", "Confidential". or "For the Addressee Only" will be delivered unopened to the addressee. E. The Mayor-Commissioner and Commissioners receiving individually addressed mail will be responsible for replying, asking the City Manager or City Attorney to reply, or placing the matter on the agenda for formal Commission consideration~ 50 - " . . + ' ,...: ,~,:;.:.~e':.. rl': :'~ :'~'Ye' ~.~ 'e~~~'!' :~..:' ~::'_ , ~'>o:~. ...,' ~ II: ' I:, ~ -.i:\::::,>.' tiN~:,:',:'~ .". }~~:~:' ,'.':. . . ',~., . . ' ~:~.~:,~~..<~ ~ :: : ~. ,",-.. " ~~,;" '" <, :~,'rn:'~" .. . ' \' ';.' ,,~ I: . I . ,'" ' 'i: i,' ':. t ~ 4' . ~)~~ .,. .,' \.,.,; , ~'. -I ~ , _~"";L.!~1f':j4,"'.M.:.~.:tJ~1,;~~~''''''''~-: ."----..h'.....,.Jt>>.i.olI~.Io.llriW~_.;""ltW,.~~~'_,\...';'1. ~',>~~. ." 't', ~ - ., ' . " ~;~: ' ~ " , ""-~. . '< " , '.'I..e ~,' ;" co . " ,':j'+:: , .;" \ ,~. '" . ,~:,~"", ,.' if:,;'}.:. .J);:":' . 0 . ',~:' ' 'ti:' '.. e .~~,~, " '. ' . :' :1,l ,'::,..'.. , . ':~...l . ~.., ~ ' '.i; .:.:;. '."'. 1',,1 ". .'. ", . ~~..:. . '.., ~~J.~::',:,'::.\':I. ;',: r.1.!..,.>, , ~~1;)..: '.: . t)\ .,' :"/~r::',:.:.:' , l~:i. ,.","':" ,.' ~~:r., '. . , Jf,~., {(\ , , ~f; . If~.() . f.i'~ ' ~n~: . ,t~} ~, ; .~~'. . J,: 1" ' ;<~~, : ~i: ~;~:r~,:. ': /,: ; .J::~jl :;(':.: ., " ~"..;',' .. '. >.~. ' 'I '. . ::-":',' , ....:...". j " .~' . . , " ~:.., .' , J ! . CC~16 Cant. F. The City Manager will be responsible for seeing that mail addressed to the Commission as a whole is properly answered or placed on the agenda. G..' The City Man~ger will discuss with the Mayor malicious mail. .H. When'a Commissioner serves 'on a board as the City Commission's representative. that Commissioner shall keep the City Commission and the . City Manager informed of the board's activities by providing periodic written or oral reports as the Commissioner deems appropriate. . Note: 'This policy i~ to be reviewed in approximately one month. i 1 I I t .', , " 'I' :'1" . . " "~ ' , ." " , ' ~ . '. : l' ., i " , : I , : ; " I . It' "E', I j . 1 i ! t I l I I \ I ! ~ " . 0151 I ~. . . ( ., '; i >'. ", ,.",' r . .. u_...._ : . ~(, ,~ ~ t r t. 4, ~ " 1,. ", U '. I" . T !" ~'.,' NEW CLEARWATER'CITY COMMISSION', c No. CC-IZ Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 4/8/96 City Commission Strategic Planning Amends: Rescinds: Reference: \, 4/8/96 Special Work Session " l,,_t i':"+ Statement: " , ~ " ,I , " l( " , ' Each year the City Commission shall meet in a strategic planning session(s) to develop a five-year strategic plan which will include a three~year financial forecast, presented to the City Manager and will be the beginning of the budget processfor:the next ,fis~al year. ,,' ", .,~, > .,.. ". ' ,. :!': ~.;; , ',' '. . t." , , '( .- '!', I ' ~:, I " .:i:: " ' ,...., ' ;{'":,.,,' , '''11, " ~'! ' ,',.'., ': '1 " " .;. I ' I. I ~.';., ' 1~:,',': ((~.. " .... ,'" " i':" , ' , .:..; '. ;~ " L ' , ~,,~-;-, ,. 'l '~~': :., '~~~:,:~~. ,: . '.\ ' .~~?'" ' _".....~~,...'~.~, .t:':'.~.. '.'~'_ ,.'~............... 'I , , 52 - . :f I " :! . ~ J ~:, ,:1~J-: .. , , ," ", {,;' -I,,".' ,.. .. , .' . '" ~~~>\ I t;\: ,'. ~~" ., , (::~?~,' " ~~~~<; : ;if r " (,:<I~. ' \>,:,"" ',:t" ' l' ~ ' ,',- , .:~\ . .~ J:'.. i: I . ~ '. 1 ~. '4,~ , " ':0 ~: ',1.,.,' .' .., ~' ~:t : ...~.. : ~ ).: . '1' ' .,:~: :' I, v: . \1', , " :'., 'I! ..' " il ' .,.,. , ~, \"', {:::" ' ~ " ' .. .... " ~l ~ ; /{/, '. . " " ',~. , , . . 0 f ~ ~....l" ~. > . ~ I " , , CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. CE-1 , I Policy Statement 'General Toplc Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 ' City Employees Participating in Auctions , Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 11/29/78 Purchasing Memo 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session Statement: , City employees and Commissioners are prohibited from participating in City , auctions ,.involving the sal~ of property which has either been abandoned and , confiscated. acquired with public funds or which has otherwise come into the possession of the, City. They may attend as spectators but may not bid on or purchase items ,offered for sale. All actions that would lead to perceptions of participation,' such as a family member bidding on items. should be avoided. It is:the intent of this policy to' avoid giving "insider" information or a 'profit motive ,to employees or their families in the disposal of surplus items.' , i " I ! I i :' " , 47- l}'~ " ~~l~~Ji.~~t~~Jo:t...,..~~--_. '~~"""""""-~~""-"''''''''''',' ~ _............'....i....._........~J\>U,l~'.!.-~.....:....:,.-'~.-l~.;-'.....t:h~..',:...: i..;~'~......~...~;~"'.,1 'I;', .0:'-1;. . '.~....'~ ...... .~:"" ,.~ "; .....' : ~~..:' " .: :',: , .'.'.. ~ I ' 1 0, ~ CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. GA-1 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 General Administration Application Fee Waivers Amends: Rescinds: Reference: .9/17/81 Agenda Item #95 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 2/18/92 Work Session #CLK-l Statement: ;l' Generally, application fees will not be waived except for other governmental agencies. This does not include parkland dedication impact fees. It is inappropriate for departments to bring forward application fee'waiver requests. This does not preclude appeals made directly to the City Gemmission. If staff believes special conditions exist. such requests may be brought to the Commission for consideration. Application fee waivers for 'governmental agencies will include all governmental projects including those in which the governmental agency is leasing property from a third party, providing the governmental agency is the entity which applies for and obtains the permit. PACT will be considered a governmental entity when considering application fee waivers. , -, , . ~: NOTE: The City Clerk's Research regarding waiver of application fees shows the following: ' Chi Chi Rodriquez Youth Foundation - no waivers Center Foundtion - waive building permit fees Pinellas County - waived bUilding permit fees for work done by County forces: waive fees for variance application State of Florida - waive fees for variance applications Clearwater Ferry - waive building permit fees St. Petersburg Jr. College - refunded building permit fee for parking lot None of the above includes waiving impact fees. Reeemmendation: Delete 'f', 54 . c \ ' . .l ~~"'i:.' . CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. GA-2 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 General Administration Water & Sewer Impact Fees Amends: Rescinds: . Reference: 3/3/82 P&R Memo 3/16/82 ACM Memo Annual Information on Impact Fees Revenue Manual Agenda Item #27 - 12/20/90 Statement: '; All developments including City-owned are required to pay water and sewer impact fees. The City will pay impact fees for infi'" housing projects and , other non-profit organizations providing affordable housing and meeting the criteria listed below. Revenues generated through the lease of the Fulton Street Apartments are used for the special fund set up for these payments. " ...' ; ~'. j" . Cri teri a : 1. Must be a 501c(3). non-profit organization providing a non- discriminatory' community service. in the areas of housing or training. i:, ' i;', I " I, " r>:., II.,' , , ' 1 :.. I" ' 2. Must limit its services to clients for a time period not to exceed 18 months. 3. The nature of service provided by the organization is such that it would be classified as a "Public Service" under the United States Community Development Grant Program or equivalent as administered by the US Community Development Office. I ! ' !. i. I,: , I 4. Must serve clientele whose income falls below the Federally set annual poverty level of $5.496 (single); $7.404 (2 person household); $9.300 (3 person household); and $11,196 (4 person household), 5. Services must be rendered on a no charge basis to qualifying applicants. ,...,' ,i::. 55 " '. , . .,' :- I. , , , " ~ " > '.' _e'''...... ,.., ,... ',j." ~. "I','.,Jo..'h"...'~,~I"""'-'. >'''-_'''''''loH:oI,..I,,'' .. , ... ';~~'I'/ ~'~' .,..,~:I. >: ,\ ~ e~"~~:';<<':<;~'~'\ I'.. , " ~ ,~, ": \" '~~>". j. . " J. I",: "",.,+ .". H,' ~,\ c., . .. I. ',' .-., , ';,...' ". '.. ' ~ I ' ',~', ' 6. Organization must a) be a current recipient of public funds or it may ,be prudently assumed that it will be the recipient of public funds. or ' .' b) provides services which takes load off City staff or off other governmental staff providing local services (appropriate government offices). " .,' .f' , , ;;, .' > .~ '.* This will remain a policy for now. An Ordinance will be brought forward at . a. 1 atel' date to codi fy thi s as part of the impact fee codes. /' ~:: ' " , . . Recommendation: 'Delete - Lease Agreement for'Fulton Street apartments. dated 4/1/91. ,~ncludes this criteria; .~. '. '. 'I. >' '> ,I '. .~.: :: " . , '. . .' . ':e' , ; ..' ~'}'::.: ' '~ <,' ~ I :,' .~, . ~~':., ~, , ;;,," , ' ,,' " . I. .,.. I . :' ; ; I I l { , " ',.' . .r 1.(' , '" . " , ~ , ~ , I;,'. \ , .; I , ~;.,~': "" . . ;rF.' ; ':.. ' ~;'[~:,: ;'. : .",,'" " , 'I. :/'~ " ~(~. ' .', 'f' }'~:" ,', I '. ,"... 'e t.;:..e', ' ';:'''..' . ' t., ~~; ," . . , ' ~~.;>':: ~ ,0 ' of.,' , r..~ ""'.., ' \ j . , , ~:',~!l~. " " ~'i" ,~.-~ll ,} fl'l", '\ .. ," If':::-,:~. ',' J{t~: :.~ . ~:i:. ,...,": ,'.-. ' .. , 56 , .i .' " , ,. ,~ :) '. - H' " ... , l', ,> ., t'." !<':' ., t l~'~;' ' " J, , ~ ,. {. , ....." ' ~". ' , " ~~,:' , '., ''', . (. " " i': , 'i:.::: ~',h " '11,;;" , <:'~,: ' ' :' .. ~ j n,. ." ,. I'" ;t, ", >" , " , , :,::, ~ :' '~ _..: e, ,'" I:" ) ..:. ' 'I' J.. ~ , ,.. . ' , , ,..'e :. ' ,.....J, . : ~J ", . " ' ',; " '.: -:,-' ' ' ~., ..\~.~ '! ' :"~: .1 :' '. ' " " , e', .....", '" CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. GA-4 Policy Statement General Topic SUbject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 General Administration Sparkling Clearwater Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 1/21/86 PW Memo 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 10/16/89 Work Session Statement: In' order to maintain and enhance the image of Sparkling Clearwater. the ,Commission supports staff in enhanced solid waste recycling and conservation' projects,. tightening and increasing enforcement of codes (i .e.. fence landscaping, prohibition of banners. lot clearing, etc.). Staff is also directed to place a greater emphasis on and coordinate aesthetic consideration on site plans and other development review (i.e.. placement of dumpsters. landscaping). 'Education"l and incentive programs for both City staff and the public addressing this issue should be developed. It is the desire of the City Commission to expand the "Make It Sparkletl program. " j ", t, 52 '> j ~. ~ , "'.l'"",, I, " " , " "/, ' " , 't ,. ~: . ~ :,((;::" ',', ~.. :.: ' \ ~ ~.. ~ ~~~;?,: ' , ' 1;":(" :~~:''< " . '::,I."{"_ .~.;, ' .:J-': : ,tii::::::;' . ftU- ':~~.~t:~,:, . :'.:i::'l , ',:-: ' .~:~':.' , ;. '~,. " I . ~ . . , . , .., r;:~" , ,; > : :'~ ~ . e , " "j, ,.-;;":.: ,~,:~.~', c.' 'I', " ;',1,1 " ~~~:.." . , eeJ<:,', . ~' l, " . ",' ,I , , 'l' \::. , , " , . 'I' ~:.'I; , ']f,',.,', :'>~: ". ' " ' , ." , , ';,;" ."' ':.3. ~: ,l " . ! ~, ',:'.>' , ,. ,p, ,,~"j'" CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION' Policy Statement No. GA-5 General Topic Date Adopted: 1/16/90 General Administration Subject: Drew Street Banner , Amends: Reference: ~, .,. Rescinds: 4/3/86 CC Meeting 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session, 10/16/89 Work Session , Statement: I The City Manager may approve banners to be placed on the designated right of way where Drew Street 'terminates at Cleveland Street. Requests may be submitted one calendar year prior to the intended installation date and will be, approved for a one-week time period. The City Manager may. if no other requests. have been received. extenp the approval for an additional weekend (2 days) . , I '" ',r : Lw't.'. I " 53 I I j' I i J '- ~. ',\" I ...... '. ,.'.. ,e'...~ ~" "':." , CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. GA.6 ',:' ' Policy Statement 1', .. General Topic Subject: .; General Administration Fire Lanes Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 517/92 i' ,"e1. I:'e " !;: I, i~, " Amends: Rescinds: Reference: " I ~':' I ':.~ ' . ' , '~t~~; ~', ' \/;~:" ,. .i;~,/, 11/15/84 Agenda Item #69 , l f '. . , " ' Statement: ' , Fi're Department pe'rsonnel will partiei pate in the enforcement of parking violations pertaining..to fire lanes and fire hYdrants. ,,'. ' ..... .'., ' :-1.,,' ',' ;~ \', :~t'.:'. ' {(' , ,i ~~\\, , , " " ~:: " ,::.,,,, L ." '::Y'''. J .' ". . ~~ .~; I ,':, : ;,.i:' ,~ .. , .' '. ~" .,' . :;}, ~ I r~'i' , I >~'. \ e ~:'i '. ",~I.'j, ~ : . >';'~ ' ';'j; :~,<,: .. ' t~~. : ," '.' .. , , \, . .'. ., .~ ;"1: ~:' . :;,:::: ~y,:::,;;" ' ((j'." :;~~',,:' . I " -: ~'; ! ' :/~~',~' :e '1 .. ~ . . .'~:". ' :'1 ~,l i'" I;~;" ' :i; . I~" , j " ' " 54 :'.,~':' ,. , } 1-: ~ ' ' ,." I , .. .~'~ ~,'.: .. . , , \~~:... , :i' ~#~~_._. " , ':.,....."'~11......~~~.....~...--I'L--i-.........Ii;:,' e-", .i}>..;:.....,..r~":,I,:;.;......"<,,.,"1'.b...,.-OlI.&.'.,:..:!,~.i,:U....""!'..~r.;{l.~.\I,.:,~;4~'-'~"""""~'""".'" ".n. ~. , '. ' ~>' ")';'.: " "':"e"~"" , I , .' t' '." ~ ' \. ~'.:.. ", .... ~~';. . I " I' ,,: e ,r~ ~ ' ~'U', .' .,'. .,'.' ,.l ' ':"., '" :>1:' " 'l'. " .I::"~ '., . e,:;;( ': t::';' ,'.:, I~ ,~, ",' >r." .!-.-l' ,.}!, . -:" " ~~~ 3 ~" ~ I' ': , '\ , :- I e ~, . ,I , ~ .. ,,' ,c' ~, ~ . f:.'.. \.~ . , t~'. l ~ '::>1' . 1.1~',; ..' '~~.:<' .,1 . ~ . f" ~;~~,i ' }~~~... ' ir' , ~. ~;:,'{' " >~ , ~~ '," ':,L,' ';:".:: ' f;':':", . ~ ' ',~ ' ....:~", ~ . W.,', ",,",., '1' ", >,' ~ i . ' . t I . . > ~ , CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. GA~7 Policy Statement , 'General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 General Administration Copyright Fees Amends: ' Rescinds: Reference: 3/18/85 Work Session 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session Statement: ' , The City shall pay the necessary copyright fees to ASCAP for those concerts in 'the bandshell co~sponsored by the City. The City shall provide a monthly report to ASCAP regarding activities in the ,bandshell and ASCAP shall'be . , ' responsible for collecting the fees from bands participating in non-City ,sponsored programs. , i I I [ I t , ; , I " ,\ I 55 " .,.....l~';.... I .. .1'"' ......f. ~. ~ .,.1.' ."',__. I!..~~.~_""" . . e_~""""""""'_er+.._~. ....,'., ,.. . e,. _ .' ~, i, ' i, : <.. i, ,., '/, , , ~ 1 . I. . 1-,;,~ . _'" "r ~,~ . ' (, ,>, ~?~~,~ ',~ , " c..'." ~ ~J:- ~, l' . ..... e ;11;, . : '.1': ' ,.' . ~ :' ',', -: ? . ., :! ~ '. ,. , :i,,', ' ':~:: ", "j( , ;1./": ' <i " , ,', ., , ~; " :~;',. ' " .. , ,.i .;., ~ ' .,.. . ". ;?:..:' ;-;1.' f.. ~ "j-' , rr. ' \l,~.:, : :t, ~,; < < " . /,~ " ,C'~I.'~ '" , " ~.\ '~J,' . ~:\,~. . ' ~i~'~:; , :" ~ <'):.' . , ~.;.y.::'., . t..l+' . ' :;I'~ .:' ro'" ' f; ; J . . ;:/r' . I . , " .t, ," ,~ : :" 'T," '. .' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. GAw8 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 General Administration Renewal Amends:' ' Rescinds: Reference: 2/18/86 Statement: All renewals 'of agreements the City has with organizations or tenants should be',presented to the'Commission at least sixty (60) days prior to the , expiratlon of the original term. , " .. '...' : " " . , , , . ,. 56 :n,~."",,~;.u:~'.{'tl,..'i,ti.:~~..t4["""""""'J:,:i,o""""""""""" ., ",_, ------......--....,.....' " ..-................'w--........t..... '.....'".1. ~"'-....-4I.:,....LtL~'.;..> ,,'l.).'.ol: ,~.,~, ,,...,'.......0'),.,,,. .,," .." '. -... .......,.. ", ,,' : I~ . , ',' i.i, ~~, ~ , fJ,.;:,:' .' ~: :10 . ;:.. ; !':' :~ :-" .'. ~ ,'~ '~ :' ~; < ;\', ;\'; , .. < ~tJ " ,:~:~:, : ':.,': ',:1" '. , I.. ,'" '\ ' f...' ';:.1-, ' '\ ,~.e , , I' ~~' ~, " , .,fl', ;f,;'..' '. .I,,~.: ::., : ' ,'.' , " .,f-,:~:~ :.,;~ " .: 7;:..' e(.. ~e~.':;::": .'~':..' '.:'~::.l .~+, CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement , i No. GA-ll General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 3/18/96 General Administration Stationery Amended: 8/1/96 Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 3/18/96 Worksession Minutes 5/6/96 Special Work Session ,Statement: The City shall have one form of stationery on which " Gray recyclable paper stock \\'il" be used the Ci ty sea 1 will be i mpri nted . It,i th blue ; nk . C; ty , Officials will not be listed on the stationary. Paper stock will be recyclable. Other forms in supply will be allowed to be used until said supply is depleted. Exception: The Gas Division may continue to use its logo but the City Seal must be located somewhere on the stationery. I , I l ( , : :1 ) , 65 ~~ :1 - \".' , . ~ ~ ' ::\' ~"'~,.f ~ .. ~~~ ;.: e, , , l'.., : ~:;L,:',' :. :.; ~~ t . '" T '~ ,~, ' .., \, I ~:j:,' ,~''"" ,'. ,""I' .'~ ~", ;:~, ":. ' . ~', L' I ~. .:: j, ::..' 'e . :1;<,'."" ~~:c~:': ;~~~k :< ' ~r,~/:: ...:.. ~.::j' ~:: . ~~:1;' , ,.[J- " '.I:(f .'. ~~;:>' , i"~; I;,' , . , ''l.'.'' '. " ",." ":.. . ., ;~~~~:: . I{.:;:-.' , t;I;~:'/'~ :,\'1.;', ' ~~'~':':'~'~: , " .. -.,.,1' " . ~ :/,'~ . ~.,' ' , ~/;, '. ,!.'> ,n, :; .,"1' . ,~ " ; ~~, 0 I .: ~j:~ e, " '. ',. ' 't;~?~ ': ' "':I~'?I' " " ' i\,~:: ~ : :' \..\'-. ".: ~ r., ~r:,' , ~.;,~\;,.', ' i.i. "" .~ j " ~/ .;.. ." ' , ~ ,... , . . '".1 J,,' ~, CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION ~ . I .' . .' ~ ~ ' ; d e, ". No. GA~ 12 . Policy Statement General ~opic General Administration Subject: Date Adopted: Welcome letters Amends: Reference: Rescinds: .Stateinent: , . Upon adoption'of an Annexation Ordinance staff 'will prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature welcoming the new resident to Clearwater. .', ., ' . . ,j " . ,I', : , , ~. """ 1 , , ,. , ' I' 60 , '~.,' ~ I _, l I ! ; . ~ I i l " . " ( , - ,.~~,.",: " (' ' .', ',I ~ '~l', ' ""t . '., f.', ' " , ~ . !l! :f' t', ,t..~ :,:~: " ~f; .:, '" . " P' :l:-': :' ,~' I'" I,:' I: ." ,', l\f.. ~ 1~1' " "},.>' :'~.\i .' '1-', . ."'. , ':',' ' , .:'.: 'II', ." CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION ..: .... No. GA-13 Policy statement General Topic Date Adopted: General Administration Subject: Citizens to be Heard Responses Amends: Reference: Rescinds: Statement: 'Responses 'will be sent to those addressing the Commission under Citizens to be , . Heard regarding Items not on the Agenda. For those not requiring a specific 'response. a letter will be sent from the Mayor. thanking the speakers for their input. :, . '!, , " ,,' 61 ' I ~ . . , ,."Streetclosures for special events shall be limited to two (2) per calendar . year requested by anyone non-profit or for-profit organization. The City of : Clearwater' shall be exempt from this limitation. The City shall comply with any FloridaOepartment of Transportation policies regarding street closures of state roads. . :"~. '''I. :;.,< .,> I " > , ."': .,.'e" : 'e 1- '.. , . \" ';.'.:' +~ e ,. ' I CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION General Topic General Administration Amends: Statement: " , . , , i,: ~~i .' /,' ,.~P. , I' ~ ' ' ", ,) , :", ~ L: '.:', , ", , ,~. . , , ' ;\' '. :, I ~ "',".' ,\ ,., t ~ ' ~: :,_1, ., , :1 , ,I' NEW No. GA-14 Policy Statement Subject: Date Adopted: 4/15/96 Special Event Street Closure Limitation Rescinds: Reference: , ~; ,. '~ , I: Ii , ~ } . j I ., :i 68 I i t; ~~Ult)~'fJ:~i.~i~iJ11~i~..t~.J.I:~~'~"> :-~~W~"'I.oI...~~....,;':H"".-4-I:.':";';"", ~ ...', ;. , . . , I,. ' - \', CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No, LD-l Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 ,Land Development Street Vendors Amends: , Resci nds: Reference: L ' \' ",,' 7 /21/82 CM memo 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session Ord. #5821-95 '" ~. ' , :',' I " , Statement: < ~ :' , " '- ; ~" , , Administratlon will not process requests for approval of street vendors (i.e.. hot dog stands. popcorn stands). This prohibition will exclude such vendors . requested in conjunction with Special Events approved by the City Commission . , or as otherwise may be provided in the Land Development Code. Ord. #5821-95 allows sidewalk ,vendors in or immediately adjacent to public parks in the Urban Center,District. ." ,:.,.,~. . . . I." , {,.,:'. , ;, ' ;. , j:'-;", ' 'e,t ' I' ,"'-.n " I~' ., ' ;' ~ ~ '. :' i, ,I" " I'.' .' ) , ,,' ~":: I . ;1 ,.' .' ,.t-.:. '" ' 62 ~ ,"" . . I ' , '0 , ' i r . . " J.,ll' .' t:{iC:;l~~~..l';.o..","'",;,;: .-, ", ",...' ........_,A>_',~'{ R.!'\....J..~..,,"~~t.:..}-... :..,.._,~'.. '......J... ."'""";;:....).....,....tl...""'......Jo~"'1 J.."~-I.'~. ~..........~.. -...... -,.'......'''1 'r ._", :."-" ..: . ~ ~. 'l ' > " ," , 'I " >. .) ~ ",' ". ,~~' :::;: . .,'.', '::". ~. " , , \~~' ,I; ,', .. , ' ~;~: ,~.;. :.. , ' , ' ,(~~:,: /:~: " ,. . " i ~' \. :' I , t ~:',:" ,::F~, ~" ';.':. . ' ~'U 1 ..?('." :,H. . . ,u ~I,- ~ ;'1' . " {t:' ';~l~?' :. " . ~ i' , , " t':'{'e' ." . ~ .:' ; ~ \ ~. ;1, ' . ~~L~~,''', , 1 .:., ~ . ' ':""'. . :fL::,< " m/:,..:'...,... ' }JV::,:~:, <' . ...,';, ~;~?)~ J:'~'e.'. " ~' ',I " ':.,1<. , .' , ~',>' ' I r',:' '. ~~,:: e' ' 'ii ' '!;; '.. ff:~;~" " " .J' '.' ;1" , ;.;~~,:, '. { ~.: 1.:', ," : e I , T"."',,..',. "~,~ , " ' ~r,:,;;.' .,.' .'. '"C .', .,.r::: ~~~' " , ~"!"..!.: 1.' ',: .: '.: "," . . . . 1 ..... , ~. <'"' e. , " , . h-'e" ~ ~ . CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. LDw2 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Land Development Annexation Agreements , , . :Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 6/21/84 Agenda Item #100 . Statement: The City Manager is authorized to' approve routine annexation agreements involving one existing or proposed residences., Where a discrepancy exists 'regarding land use designations.'.right-of-way requirements. or any other, circumstances. administrative approval is not authorized. A quarterly report of administrative approval is requested. '. " . " I' :' ~' " \ . , J ( . j , ( ~ 63 , 1. ,'- 1 . . " i, ~':: ' I' '. " .. . ~ . ,~ " I J'-..'~':'," , : ~ . , ' , , .~ ' ',1 .. \' ," , :', ~! '" ~ \ -' , I ' 1;(' : ~ :' " " CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. LD-3 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/4/93 Land Development Subdivision Monuments Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 2/19/81 Agenda Item #13 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 3/4/93 Agenda Item #34 Statement: New entranceway landscaping, monuments. signage, and walls shall not be allowed within the public rights-of-way of the City of Clearwater. Such special treatments are to be upon private property and in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations. The owners of all'existing entranceway f~atures occupying public property are to execute an agreement with the City of Clearwater wherein owners agree to keep all features in good repair, hold the City harmless for any liability arising from the use of the public right- of-way, and provide a $500,000 liability insurance policy. Upon failure of the owners to execute such agreement and provide the required insurance policy after forty-five days from written notice. or by tagging the structure when owners cannot be determined. or upon failure of the owners to repair or maintain any feature of the site which has fallen in disrepair after similar notice. the Public Works Department is to remove all such materials occupying the public right-of-way. A wooden sign with breakaway features approved by the City Engineer may be allowed within the public right-Of-way when ,associated with the Parks and Recreation "Adopt a Park" program, and is to be limited to a size necessary to name the sponsoring agency in 3-inch letters. Such sign to be a maximum height of 18-inches. i I ~ ' , , I 64 ~i-l.":'~ .,'" ~ .. . "'JI!-.M'~",,,,,,.,'n"". 'h~.......-.......,>A ...~", ..~. "..'.' "',.~. ..~ /. " ,I., , ..... ,,< ~ , ' " ... ' , ,,. 1 '. . '" ,> '." ',5," ,~' ;.~ " >-' . e ',' ''-'' ~ ....e,~ ,.". ,..; . t ;,7 '" '/;,: ' : ~ '. ' " , ~ ~ ~ . ~ :-: ;~~,: , .', : , . f.'<..... ~~;'" . ' ., ';; I " , '}l,:' .:. J }:~ . j,:". fr'. '. , ,''-'" ~: ' '~! ~ . . , .~ .: ' "1 " "';- ',' ~.;' , ,,~ CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement 'General Topic . Land Development Subject: ,) Petitions for Annexation' Amends: ' Rescinds: No. LD-4 Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Reference: 4/21/83 Agenda Item 1121 Request to be made' that all, contiguous parcels under.the same ownership be annexed simultaneously. . ~1I\J.~U~~~_.:----". "'-:--~.._-=:~.... ...:---~~.: ' ',~----t!t-'"",,,-I""'''''~~,M.,Ol>:....,f''';'-I-o'.l..o:W,I,,1.-' .4...,':~ :---A: K.~~'~"'-'_';",-I,"';'~adl~'" J,.....u.....e~...., D....'. ; 0 Statement: " /I ": 65 J" . , ~<.~::!' . '. ., " , ~ I: ~, "' t. ;.' , .' ,'.1 ~,' . ,;", '. :~ \, ~ ' . .", . e'e>': ::,\ '~ .' '} . ~, .' '..' , ", ~ ',I ~'<; , '';1", i... l~ , ::../. . eZ.,.' ." :,;S:, " ~t~,~:. , t\,:', , ,j.; , t~; . . :'( /~: II CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Policy Statement No. LD-5 General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Land Development Site Plan/Ord. Pending Amended: (Reword only) 3/19/92 Amends: ' Rescinds: Reference: 6/2/83 Agend Item #7 7/14/83 Planning Memo 10/16/89 City Attorney Memo Statement: After receipt and referral of an Ordinance amending the Land Development Code. minor plan changes to certified site plans may be accepted even if the . proposed Ordinance relates to the proposed change. The request will still follow established procedures for processing. No building or site plans will be approved which are inconsistent with the pending ordinance.: 66 ~1A.1;'!t-~.'PI{.. :'l'I\V.J}~'#IIIiII~""".~' , ,~......~_",,'io""_'"'''''''.''' ....n'.. 'u M '~".~?~""""--"",~-",,-l,l.""'.'l;>.o:.......,,,,~ ....... .~~f::. ,,-roc." .,f"~...~"~.'-."-,. ..:>~,.~ ~).. ,,,...~.. "". ,uh " ,~ ,.1..,.., ,~;_, . ' I, 'I"; ,. ,:'~/. F' ~>' ',' '.,'~, ..~.) '.' ,. ~. ~" :', '" {, , . \ ':. , , CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. LD-6 Policy Statement 'General Topic 'I Land,Development Subject: ' Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Scenic Corridors 'fj , , Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 1/10/85 Agenda Item #83 ~ { I , , Statement: ,..'" ['. Support for limited development. low density residential development on scenic , corri dors . ~.: ",~ ' T',> . ~ ~> c, ;r:~ I,'., :~,~. ; , ,. ~ ~ !~ gt.:, , '~J:: '{ ',,,r ;F~ ":' -' " , ":,i.." , , ' ,\ :( " , J ,c. ~ 'j i )11,- :i,., , " " .' , , : ' ~\. " I , .~'~ I' ,,' j 1 ~l :;~ . " ,/ " :.~ ~ ~ \ " l: ~ . , . ... ., " ~ ~ ',' '/" T I ~. ~'" ,I 74 , e ~ 1'- ~;;; , ',1, ' .,... '. :~:}, ' 'ff.,:;" "'tBlt~WJJIr$::~~~~""'U-4'.~'" ~~ '"............~..-.'!I.It':-.M.o..! w.:.u;--i.......;t.JI.<.~~!-.h;..:(>.;:;r1-;><-e;:.:.::...I\,?o' ;'::O~'f:'p;;' J I~ ,\,.:. ,.,:. , , ", .. ,,~' ':, ) I,' ~ \ ' ".,. L .;.. 'I, .. ," I, .,.. ,.,.1'.'. ..,,;.,.' ': 'I f. '..el ; :',. eJ' , ~:":. I . .>';'~'.'. ,<"I:\~.":'(:,,<: .,. t' .' :(e e ::,:', I,', '~. " tT':':.' ':"..' I',: " , , " ~ " .' . . ., ';1. . , ';'1 " , . " ,,;, }"> . , 'u' ' ... ,.,.~ .' , ~ ' I .'" ~ I. ' 't': '1 r ~. :~:- ;, , . .,' , " . I';, . " :. :,' ,. " ',. " ~ ,. " .::., . '~rk..' /'>: ,~~~~~,,: ~. CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. LD~7 Policy Statement General Topic Land Development Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Easements - US19 Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 3/21/85 Agenda Item #52 Statement: The City will request Amend cxisting policy from 40-foot drainage and utility easements right of way easemcnt from developments along US19 to 40 foot drainagc and'utility cascmcnt~~ . ' I . " i '1 .. ;. ~: '. . I' ;. " '1 '.' " , ~ 75 ,,':i.' !.';',> " . , --..' < , ~!~:.~\'W;~*""~-~;,,~,- ..---..-...."...,.-""""""-\..I......i~;.,.~:w-t.;.i;.o> ':".i."!,~"",,, . ~,i" ;1'.. .. I " '.;' .1...., .., , ,,'.', , ! ~' CLEARWATER'CITY COMMISSION No. LD~8 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 Land Development Variance to RPD Projects Amends: Rescinds: Reference: >.. , , , 10/3/85 CC Meeting #57 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session Statement: , .' . ' No 'requests for additional enclosures in RPD (Residential Planned Development) projects that have been approved with zero lot lines are to be accepted. ,- ~~., " ' '" " ~. .. No variances in RPD projects shall be ,allowed without City Commission approval. In most cases, when the Commission approves the variance, they will require amendment to the site plan rather than approve as an individual variance. ' ' >.ye' }':! ~ ~~.~: I :~ ,:' . " " . , ;l..,> " {):.~ ' ", ,', " ":'; ", j , , ii' , c..'. \~. :. ~:' . . I".,:'" ,~, ' 76 "':. , '~\:', ',',> ',.f" , l .~~~~~"'._"'~.~~~_.~~"~~'~I~,:-..t...LIis...;:.;..wUt':":,"';'li....Jo;"~_'tl.J.L"~.~""'~':::":"';'yj,,:',,::,,::;, -.i.. ." ''-, ,," .:!io." , ., '. " , ., i , of .~. ", '-.' . , /.J~:}.., . .\/. : ': ' , " ~ .", "", .. . ,c. ~ . ..~~ . ,., . .!J;~r . ' . .>/.;.~. c . (,-r~~C '". . ~!\:' " ,..t!. ~ !t~~ 1< . ~'i~'\.l.L, . :~ ;~i."., . .~~:~'::'" .. 1'-' f:":' ,"' :h,:, (~t.:~ c ~@-''':, ii.,<" ",;~... r,:,:, r,..::' . ~...'... : :...~../ ~. . :;'1(" ' i~-' , ,', ~>::(: :~,r. .....~ .' ?;~:'I' ::i~.~' . ,I. ' " "'" . :r.d,l~ ./.:"1' . :~;).. :' .~.~~ ..: " " " .... :r~"..1 . .", ';;l, :~.~'.~. ~"\ ~A: ~ ~ ~.. ,i " "f ~" " , 4' "I ll;:,:,':' " ' '!', . . ,'.' ," , 'I';'::':~ '. ~. . ~. ' (~:T~<: .'.' c. :~:~r~',~ '..' ," ., ~;:~:. , ~C" I: . ~\" ". , . ',": . ..~ T,.,"; ~ I , . <" ~. .... . .' .' " .',.. " ."..... . CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. LD~l1 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 3/19/92 land Development landscaping of City Roads , , , j \ Amends: Rescinds: ,Reference: Statement: Whenever possible. landscaping will be a part of City road and street improv~ment/construction projects. . ., / , . ; '! . i_ . ! ' I t I i j 1 l. , \ , , 'j ".' . , i J " " . 72 ~~""'~...._.........--.--:--- ...,/.. .._~.._........._-~.. ."-'-"'_H n.........Iool~w. ~~\~.H..."".-HJ~;.".~~,.....:.... ~ ~ .~.hr............_...It..*:.:;....r'...~............i. ~...~~....>...._.h....~ ." .Il...... \ ' :',,~:\!(./:''''.'.: ~';'.:.~'~ ",. '.;...,.' :.. :',.~ .~.. ", i. ~" '.' If ;, /' 'I'; " , CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. LD-12 I: Policy Statement General Topic ,Land Development Subject: Date Adopted: 2/3/94 , , " Parks & Recreation Card to Annexing Property Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 2/3/94 Minutes ;'" ':1,.0, " .' 'f.;::'. '. ',- ", ;--,' , 'Statement: " ' Resident Parks & Recreation cards may be obtained by petitioners for annexation upon acceptance of receipt and referral of the application fer annexation. ' ' ..' '. . ' I ... ~ .1' " , '!: . ......-. .~ :;''',. , " ~.'/ ~; r' ~: 'I I " I ", . :. : .~' ~ ( . ,', ~',i"" :. I. ~l~.:'. . . . ~ I ',' ), .'..... ;'f : .... ~ " . ,.'1 ~;, . ' C', ~ '.;,}:', i<~. I",' " ' " . .'. ~ . ; 80 :C~.:' ' ;,'- .. ~(:I:.'" . ~i(, ;'0 '. . . ~,",~._.........t..:,~~.,~~-",.",-'_'~i_._._..!.o.l.c.....t..,.. ~~./~'_. _.;.,.,....t ~:,. ~. ':...., l>,'"' :.,: '~. ',~:'.'I':"';'l>"'''.''.'' .>~~ ~ ,CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION' No. LDM13 Policy Statement General Topic -Subject: Date Adopted: 6/18/92 , .', ~ Amends: ' Resci nds: : . Reference: 6/18/92 Minutes I i l ! \ j ,',' land Development Subdivision of Property " 'i ~',,:':. ~, . ;~.~'.!' . \. ~~ '".:;: (t". . .'," "':". \}~. :;.~~~ c <":. :;~r";:~. , ~t.,"'. ;, ~.~.. c, ~'. Statement: ,If property,was subdivided before 1982 into not more than two parcels. the , City accepts the division and permits signs on each parcel. " ':., ' ::: ~ 'I' ..... .'. ~ ',;' , .~.' I " ~'.'.c ;." . .. '. ,'l: . ,i,.. . t~ti~' . ~;t;'., .. :':~ I., ':. ..,"" ~':t' I I \ i ~ ":,<;, < .,' f, . '~ s ~ I" :1 ;."'. ~L.. . ,~~. . ,. i~;{: . ~ I 1-:S. ": ;~. . " ". ,., . . ~~(.;,'. ' ~::' .... ' , " ! ::.' ?i':'. . ."".' . t' I ~ .', . ! - ! , J 7j.'. >. ,,' ", l." ,1. ~~'... <. . .', / \ ' " ?:.... ~f;'~. :.:. jj -:1--;1," '. :~:i:,w"": ~. ' ' 74 ; , r I' 1 " . , 1:~":... N:.:\:':,'. ' ~~f'~~..,tNlf.t!t~~:":"~:";' ....--:-'-.-.--:,'''. .. ';,.. '_--""--"""''''v~~",...j."",~ ,';1 :"""_""'''~ -,-..-.."..-'- --...,. ", '.' -', i ~ l ,> l p ":. r ," . " C",'" . I" . " ~ .. " ., !. '", ~.~; ~: , . I, ~~ " . .' ..... ':'" .... '. '..- . I ~ \ .~ ',' . . ~~:.:~ .1 .: . . ..:' . -.." ". /t..: . :l\;'; .' ~. f: . i\'" I', ... F~ . . i "., I:'" ',' ; , ~ l~,'~ . ., 1:/' I ~i i " ," ~. \ '. ':,",:'. }~\, ; \... .' ....' . . i:-'}',.. \.; ,. I ;".:" " . , j:!;, , 1::':',", ).. , , ,~:\;:.'.' . I;~ . I, i' ',' ~ . ~, 'E. . " ,..I,":' , . ~. . .. : . I ~ . , '. .i:~ .... . ....., . ',:" , !'i,.;;,:...' ~~'l:'.":,. ',' .J!~.~:." ~. ~;.. ./., ..' .: '.( . ";t":'.'\ ' ,~~ I . , ~. ,,<: . .' , ' CLEARWATER'CITY COMMISSION No. LG~l Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 legal Case Reports " Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 7/14/87' CA Memo Statement: The City Attorney shall 'furnish to the City Commission a quarterly report of pending litigation. identifying each case. opposing counsel. the nature'of the case: ~nd the status' of the case as of the date of the report. In addition. 'the,City,.Atto~ney shall keep the City Commission and City Manager ,advised from ,t i me to ti me as to ,s'i gni fi cant deve 1 opmerits in each case. '., " " " " oj ~. " ,'I 75' - :,.', >. ~ I '. I ~ ,..':, . ~.' . .....F.' CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No, LI -1 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Amended: 3/19/92 Leisure Marina Slip Rental Fees Amends: Rescinds: Reference: , _ c ~ .'4. ~ 5/5/83 Agenda Item #10 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session (Not Ratified) Ord. #3436, Dtd. 3/15/84 10/16/89 Work Session :,..:".) , i . . . .l~ . . I :' !~: ' ' , Statement: ..; ~ . 'J.. ;.' Marina slip rental rates for shall be'charged on a per foot per slip length basis. Oversized boats shall' be charged the slip length rate plus a per foot charge 'for each foot the boat extends beyond the slip. The City Manager may approve rate increases, in accordance with Sec. 33.028 114.303. Code of Ordinances. of up to 5%. based on annual surveys of rates charged by other 'municipal marinas and so notify the City Commission. Increases above 5% will require City Commission approval. I i I \ 1 , " ; ~'.~': . ;'-:.'. . .'", .'; . . ~ ~. : I . .-f,' a c' Note: This policy will need to be deleted or amended once the Marina Business Plan is ~pproved. ~ fi , , " ;:' ,. " , , '" ~. \ c '( ~: '. i:' ~: . .~, 'j.. " ,:.r . ", r, :1' ,', 85 :~ J ~ ~ ~ I f! I ! ; .\ . :' ~ , p " .;.~~~~~~~:~ ,:uj";"""'.'''",~'''~''\'i~\~'~~~~~~i~iiJ.f;:~()'.~~~\t,~~J.~~~~{,:..t-.:{P.~~:J ~ ff;/;:~u.\~.,;",';' \~\:~~'LI''.L~~t': ~\;.~:.. '~.'.i,~: . < ,'. r '~', ~.t;;: '.: " fl' ' : \ '~.. . . ,,' , ."; . "; " , . ;. . . ~ . 1-,::, "f '.. :.... :/,~ t.'. ". .. ,I. . '.\:~' , . ~ .; '~::~~: .' l; " .i".~ . (~ : ' ~ ': -..... , , , ':;\'" '.':':1 ~ .~ ~. .; . ;"'!'I :~'.:~' T:. . '. f .. ' .;-; ,', "'1 'l !, . '. :~:. ' ; , " J.:' ;.:~' l " " ,/,~ ..: :!, . ~~ :" " .' ~ '. ' ...... ' .:l;;~;:< .f'. (;.: '., ,',. . .. ~ ~i.. . 1.;.:..'.' .'" :11~ '..' " . . '~{~~. . '.1 . " : )', t ~ . ~ . , .:.... ..... ~',.. ..j;' , .. :.' "" ., " 1, CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. LI-2 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 leisure Marina Parking Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 7/9/87 Harbormaster Memo Statement: , Marina t~nants may purchase parking permits that will allow the holder of the permit to, park in any available metered space in the Marina lot. with the ,exception' of the half hour spaces in front of the Marina Building, without I paying 'the meter 'rate. Permits will be available in the following categories: , ,1) 6ne.halfday;2) all day; 3) monthly; or 4) yearly. . This policy is to be deleted once the Marina Business Plan is approved. 86' ',. , " .... . .' ~I't: . > I- ' :,. ~. . , , ~w.iJtil.\i\~d..i.\.~~..,.l.,l:.'~'-_..~"""U_~"''''''~'''''J~~.;:.l".ii~~~.;.r~,t,t~HU~~'~~; .~:, ~t';r'" ..~':':, ',: ~ . " . '.. ~" J: . 'c f 11 .' ' ;} , " ( ~ I ' , , ' I , [ I' !V ,It '.,' .' " .,' , ' , J,'''cj.~...'~ ~:,. '.' ," '.:::;~' ...~,..:~. :",~"'d , . . r, . ~ ~ '.~ :; .1' ,'.' . . ':' ~ . .1, . .. l.: " ~ ~ '. . " I.'. J!:,: ' r j "., ." ~.:..' ". . ~:,I:\ . .~;; " .' :~.,y" I :\~~~~... .:' J ~ ',', ' %;~:;"":' " ~j~ ~ ~ I. ." ~ ,I: . a f . ,'.. . , ' ': .~ ~.~;:' . ~':~ " ~, : . ' .~ ~: I.' ", : . ; t ~' . . .~;:, ..' ~: , I ~ ~'. . I'~ . . " ,:.-... " . ~~:. . I.;:'" I ~ "~~', ::' .. ' . .': . !f:'".: '},'::': , I" " " ~, L~ '. . r...', ~'q .' .;"",' . .~~,~:,;..',. , ' :;{:": , ~l',l;" ' , .1;-~".;.1 .. ;~,~":,, < ~"". j- : . J-~'" ,. ',6. . > ~~.:?:. ~'.. . ~..... , , CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No , LI- 4 Policy Statement General Topic, Date Adopted: 10/12/92 .. ' Lei sure, Subject: Holiday Decorations J;" Amends: Reference: " , Rescinds: 10/12/92 Minutes Statement: _ ' , Holiday Decorations along the Right-of-ways to be installed or paid for by the City will be limited to the Downtown core and Memorial Causeway. , ; . ~ . , ' ',' J ) , . , , 81 'I ... ~ :. "'c~' . !~ 1 " , ' . " \"1.c . : : ~ ;,. ., ~ ., '. ' :<:/.' , . .~ ~ll ;: .~" _, ,I,.^}. J~~i:::: .,.. , :~t I~!i:' . ....: .. . ...... ". ',,:. ;~" ' " J \. ~l; . " ~ . .'. ,~... . . ~:~> ' . ..~.,(t;. ~. ~. >.1 ~~f: .", . j, ~.~:.:: :iX:",' . X,C ," SO;; ~ .~' . . ~t: .~ ; . > ~;;~.,> ,;', i\', :' J, . , . T ~ :.~: , H .. ~.~ 'J . '..'~ . ',.., , I. '.J '.'.' ..,' , :.:.~ .: I , ' " y;~ :. f,/,::' " ~,. ... "r., r.. ' " . ,,, ">...... r. '.c I~ ~ ."~ +(""' "" : .. No . LI - 5 Policy Statement General Topic Date Adopted: 6/1/95 "f, , " " f , ,)' , " CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Leisure Subject: Amending Rental Fees Amends: ' Reference: Rescinds: 6/1/95 Minutes ,Statement: '" , . " ~, " , '" Jr ~..: ..: ... ;r~';; . . ~;:.;:i" ... ,The City Manager,shall notify the Commission 30 days in advance of 'implementing',adjustments to rental fees for City facilities. ' , ; ..1 ! 1 . " " 82 " ~~ ., ~" '. ,', , , : L . " .'. " 1/: . 'I , , . .. j' to. r l . i' :', .,. ~I . q< _,.. CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION No. LI-6 Policy Statement General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 6/12/95 leisure Marina Building Rentals Amends: Rescinds: Reference: , ~~ ' ,", " ~:. . ,; , Statement: <'-:1, . , ~" " " ; The City Manager & Harbormaster shall have the option to bid or negotiate the lease based on rate and mix of tenant services. Staff to issue statement outlining appropriate tenant mix. Set a rental rate range of between $9 PSF to $12 PSF for second floor rooms and a range of between $12 to $18 PSF for first floor rooms. Current building tenants will receive first opportunity to . rent a vacant space in the bUilding. 'I.' " ~l:~ ",' t:: . ' '.' , '" Continue the policy of negotiating the lease with the tenant and consider his/her record as a tenant during the ending lease period. ~" . ,':. ,', The City Manager and Harbormaster will review and approve the business ,that is assigned to the space. ". ',' , " I':" I:' i,,' Adopt an ordinance that will allow the City Manager to approve and execute Marina building For Profit Lease Agreements for a three year period. Current building tenants would have the option of a three year lease approved by the City Manager or a five year lease approved by the City Commission, ' I':" , i.... ! '~. I' " !, i'" Continue using the "Standard" Lease Agreement. with the City Manager added as the approving authority on three year leases. Add to the Standard Agreement when to be in business. I'"~ -:1 Continue with a percentage of gross sales with these two leases. Other Marina businesses that sell merchandise will have either a percentage of gross sales or yearly CIP increase added to their Lease Agreement. c; 83 , .(; " .fhr~~~1::~'~",,,,,;':.&';~"f"'.II"'''~':~c._.~''. ~~~_~.~.O ....."- .-..... .-~.." , , c -. . > "..- . ---<....~_"' "'~""l, ~,,',. ~.... ~... ~. '.. .... _' _",",.,~. ." . I . .. ,t .. ...." .. :.~, './ ~ , " ,'1'. ~. i.' '."{,'.U . ..... '" .., \: ~ '1 , I " . ...1 .. " , " .,. . ~y '; 1\'; '1. '. .; " t. Item # 27 r, :t~: ~.' \ ,~ . ' ".J '. :',: .J' . ,.~ . ;..J; '," ~~~.i;: . :,. " }f: : ~~':.~j',:,.'. ::' K~},,~' " " " \.' :;~~?i > ~i\~i~ . . H~,~,,:> . tn, . .' ~G;<';',,' ,,' ',' ~ti!~<.. .~.. .', c ~~~\.~~;. :: ..;'!,. r~~: :. '.' . }~~/7 '. , '[ , ! ;, ," '.i 1/~;;.' .1.' ,'. '1.' ;;;:/ 1; :;," .~.':... .t;:~ ]!'.. ~.~ . :i~:,\, t{ii~:,:': : ~:';;:;i\; ~~~'~ :.;.: ~.~::: < '. ' " ..j{;. j.:\ t-' '.$' .' ';' ~ ~ -.: ... ~ ~.' ..., It: ~~~;:~~..~:. :. .12~;.;: '. . ...,~, , .t~ t~' ;,' 1:tv':i."f'...... n~ L....~.....rM'........""--.;:--..........~.......'""':"_~_.~..,.I)...... ~ ,.. ~ ~ ~: . . . ~ oJ':~" ,. ~. ,'" t. . " '" - " " ~ :1: " . :! :1 I 'I ~ ~ t r I I i i I i i l ~ 'f :1 'I ;j ,1 l io ) ~ i r :i " , . r" c\ K ;;:( ~1 APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET FOR COMMISSION MEETING August 15. 19aa APPOINTMENTS Agenda' # BOARD: Development Code Adjustment Board , TERM: 4 years APPOINTED BY: City Commission FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater MEMBERS: 5 CHAIRPERSON: Otto Gans MEETING DATES: 2nd & 4th Thursdays PLACE: Commission Chambers APPTS.NEEDED: 1 DATE APPTS TO BE MADE: 8/15/96 SPECIAL aUALlFICA TIONS: "members of the board shall possess professional training or acquired " experience in the fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture or development ' control. THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE. Name Date of Original Appointment Attendance Record Interest in ~Clppointment 1. Vacant Seat - Roberle Pratt resigned 6/3/96 THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMfTTED FOR CONSfDERA TION TO FILL THE ABOVE VACANCIES: Name-Address Comments-Related Experience. Etc, 1. Sue Berfield 1466 Flora Rd., 34615 Legal Assistant, Past Commissioner 2. Douglas Hilkert 2227 Habersham, 34624 Attorney 3. William Kirbas 34 Bohenia Circle, N., 34630 Financial Advisor, current member of Park & Recreation Board but would resign from that if appointed to DCAB 4. Evelvn Mense 2444 Enterprise Rd., #2322, 34623 Retired, Manager, Collection Department Equifax, past work with NY Telephone Co. 5. Ron Stuart 2581 Countryside Blvd., #305, 34621 Public Relation Counselor Zipcodes of current members on board: 2 at 34621 2 at 34630 1 vacant .. ) , \. ' , ': " " . ~ . ......,~. DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARQ Meeting Date: 2nd & 4th Thursday Time:' 1 :00 P.M. Place: Commission Chambers Members: 5 Term: 4 years (effective 11118/93) Financial Disclosure: Required Staff liaison: Central Permitting Purpose: Consider variance applications by varying terms in appropriate ,. circumstances, as guided by conditions & safeguards contained in the code Special Qualifications: members of the board shall possess professional training or acquired experience in the fields 6f planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture or development control. Orig. Appt. 1991 ~ : 1995 ", 1995 Name/Address Phone Expir. Date Otto P. Gans . Chair H: 442~7044 01/31/98 868 S. Bayway Blvd. Apt 313,34630 (Retired. District,Marketing Manager for major oil company) William Schwob - Vlce~Chalr H: 797-1381 2574 Sweetgum Way West, 34621 ,(Retired US Coast Guardt 04/30/99 William L. Johnson 479 East Shore Dr., #1, 34630 (Vice-President, real estate) H: 447-0861 0: 442-4500 06/30/99 1996 Mark Jonnatti H: 796-5869 2775 Quail Hollow Rd., E., 34621 (Architectt 1/30/2000 Vacant Seat - Roberle Pratt resigned 6/3/96 6/96 " \ ' .' , _Jj~i:l.t~t.:J3.~~I~,ti.",...~t-t",-""-...h ". ...-....... _+T+" H........."~~...,.......-"-'~..._.......j...~,i........,~'t.".I.,,.\.. . r.' . . C:TY OF C:"EAR\\'A iER Acphcatlon for Advisory Boards ,must be Cle3rWater !lI!sldenU RECEIVED JUL 1 7 1996 Name Sue A. Berfie1d CITY CLERK DEPT. Home Address: Office Address: 1466 Flora Road Clearwater. FL ZIP:3461S 2536 Countryside Blvd.- First Floor East Clearwa ter, FL ZIP: 34623 Telephone (813) 443-7316 Telephone (813) 796-2112 How long a resident of the City of Clearwater? Over 20 years Occupation Legal Assistant Emplover Husband Field of Educa tion: Other Work Experience: Attended Illinois State Normal University Former City r.nmmiR~jnnpr Executive Assistant If retired, former occupation N/A Community Activites: Active in Church; Leadership Pinellas; Mem~ Friends of Libr~ry; Member Community Woman's Club; Past Board Member Clearwater Marine Science Center, Former member Pinellas Planning Counci Other Interests: Cl'earwa t~r Re:ldi ne; r.hi 1 dr.en Board Service (current and past) None (unless City 'Commission considered Board Preference: Development Code Adjustment Board (DCAB) Planning & Zoning Board (PZ) as a Board) Additional Comments: . Si9n~. -' ;:&t~pl.u Date: Please see attached list for Boards that require Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater. FL 3461 S 7- /s- '7 C:. . .. L... CITY OF CLEARWATER Application for Advisory Boards (must bo Clearwater resident) Name Douglas L. Hil~ert RECEIVED AUG 05 1996 CITY CLERK DEPT. Home Address: Office Address: 2"7 Hrl.b~rRham -28870 ns 19 N Stlib=- ':100 Cl4ilarwatQr ZIP: 3,1624 ~t~arwat.pr ZIP: 34621 Telephone (81:;,) ~23-143g Telephone_(813) 7ql-1142 How Long a resident of the City of Clearwater? 2 years Occupation ~ttorney Employer Douglas L. Hil~ert P.A. i Field of Education: Other Work Experience: La~.; If retired, former occupation Community Activites: Other Interests: Board Service (current and past) Board Preference: DCAB eHA Additional~ Signed: ~ Date: 7/1/);; ,( Please see attached list for Boards that require Financial Disclosure at the time of appotntment. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 ' - C:iY OF CLEARWA "i'ER ApPlication far Advisor\' Boards (must be Clearwater resld~ntl DECEIVED MAR 2 0 1995 . Name IN (t-t/ I/IV/ t 1<11&3//5 tlfV CURK DEPT. Home Address: Office Address: B~ ArfJ/fIj)./IJ1 oRat' >>1) , C uztllt!.w~ zlP:34f'~lJ Telephone J./.l/-h-~ 1?/6? L./.S, It} NO. surf!}: JOD CUL~A::mtZ zIP~3tl~s4 Telephone 'ftI.7- 6/~ How Long a resident of the City ot Clearwater? /$ yll::> Occupation p/~ttWAG.~I...~1J4 Employer. /tz:tI/ftlIC~ I5xfl2~ Field of Education: Other Work Experience: /J. r3f? :5mf),J Jft1U- t/, ":iSS () fSfk..ll C() t..t.ltt1E 6~tAI fiM-f.. tU MIM~ C-At/t1i}j;Y)Jt1-0FI, , PttWi 1l/17lI/z<ij;;t, /JJrli/l1i1ce ClJtCl 15Mlt (}VIiD fhS I rJ'l)Il{)MV/);;,v1 C(JIJrM-afJt< . , Communi tV Ac tivi te s: cveAt(MI tkU-1t I!:Ji t+eJ/ ASSlJC~. V1lu:.tij' 7/lP tt..J.1/ If retired. former occupation Other Interests: c6fOrt:T6 I vJf) Jj OrI(JJtK/A.//1 Board Service (current and past) PAflACS /1-WO- flmerzrv;'Jf1iJJ Board Preference: r:tJ=;1oJ 17UJI'M wJr c..o()fi fI,1jJtl& 7 M fIN r Additional Comments: Wf /-C, /Zr&~ FrWP! f Itlila MJ/ 12r~, IF ItIIO/~ I3tJl/-tiJ) Signed: J ^ 'h~ Date: tJLu~CJt? If/CAe; v v < Please see attached list for Boards that reQuire Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34616 \ IloICj~ - keep on Ii;+- -for ".\)cA-8 . ' . , , CITY OF CLEARWATER Application for Advisory Boards (must be Clearwater resident) RECEIVED JUN 14 1996 - Name E VG 'J,. """ \<. ,h1 eN ~E" CITY CLERK DEPT. ' Home Address: Office Address: Field of Education: Other Work Experience: . , Cbv vrt I 11M q. ~ d C I.A L WtJ;! J:: ~()$ 0 ~c.. ;!?t!/J~G1 rlt '~L c 0 -~4t:'''M.r, N.Y. 111.;t...,....&t:.IZ... Cttf:"lHT 6d".Ji'AOL +~tlC.5 -Al;t#A!..t R. If retired, former occupation MA~A<f.t!'~ Cot..Ll!c",,;o./ i)e,qJ- Fai<l.. e4>vl F.-1y (.AI clUA~k/"'-';; Community Activites: f'lttFSdHr...rr &tJA~l> 6F )),,,(ULrnl?"S of &11'-45 I1-r c OJAff)t..Y5 (0 tr C!",.,f) () /I :5$tJ ~ Pd,J!. S "'f/l..; - .Lf,4L-.b ~~a..~.<l. 7,/-<s Other Interests: Board Service (current and past) Board Preference: llc!v 6'LC/G".,tt i'lT COG" 11:\ JUr",4..f t:r...ct'" &J,.f..L.k,. I''--'1M I d' &- -+-:2.-<lrl ( N f- (!J tJ A"'<'~ Additional Comments: Signed: ~,.,.....k ~......- Date: ';I'I/?I, , T Please see attached list for Boards that require Financial Disclosure at the time of appointment. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 '~)';;.J :.........~..."'. '..T....... ~ ~ . . ~,. . .. .,. 'I CITY OF CLEARWATER Application for Advisory Boards (must be Clearwater resident) RECEIVBD FES 23 1996 C,ry CLERI( DEPT. Name ((on, 5 fUCtT f Home Address: Office Address: ;;.,q I e()lI"lr,ys;Jt:. ~/vJ. JtsO~ t J.O Itrew 5~~ ~ u,'f(! J e./ei:lf wllfe.t. Ft ZIP: Jlft.).! f Ie C( r /-Va tet; f]. ZIP: "3ft/S.. , ; , Telephone (iJ3) ?r,'-~oiq Telephone (tf,/3) 'I'IJ-ISO'; How Long a resident of the City of Clearwater? d:l ye 4/.$ occupation!Zkl'c Pe 1ft/'Oll eOllhse)ofmPIOyer ~e /1 tI Yea/' s ~() / /ey-(.. . Other Work Experience: /a HIt" .&.y lJu~: /l1!t;$ )0 Ii' ~,./ -IfJ.' fo r j4sso<<. I'.tJ, (! Jete I wille r Gt.tll E;),'fo/ Field of Education: ,. If retired, former occupation I P f C!DIn/1lerce ~bIlJJ Board Preference: fir< 1J11:1'17 c:r ~on /'!.-~ fteve/IJfrnenr (!OJe IJJ; usf", eHl Mu,,;';Pul f!cJe l!n fOfce/X.et() , Additional Comments: " Signed: ~ ~ Date: ail/l'lt, . . . ; , Please see attached list for Boards that require Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater. FL 34618 .~ I .,...... .~i.l.~'~.v.. ~:,.;....... ~,.1;..,.,+..'~' ..- , ~. , , . i' \S-\-R# -:l C\ Q Ordinance No. 6074M96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO SKATEBOARDS, ROLLER SKATES, INMLlNE SKATES, COASTERS, OR OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES; AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 28, CODE OF ORDINANCES. TO CREATE SECTION 28.11 TO PROHIBIT A PERSON FROM USING SKATEBOARDS, ROLLER SKATES, IN-LINE SKATES, COASTERS, AND OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES IN SPECIFIED LoeA TIONS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, numerous complaints have been received, particularly from downtown area businesses. about juveniles using their skateboards, roller skates, and in~line skates on the sidewalks and not yielding the right of way to pedestrians; WHEREAS, juveniles are skateboarding in Station Square Park in downtown Clearwater and are using many benches and curbs as obstacles to jump off of or over, having little or no regard for the pedestrians inside the park; and WHEREAS, the skateboarders are causing significant damage to the downtown area because the skateboards scratch and cause other forms of damage to the benches, sidewalks, tiles, and curbs; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 28.11, Code of Ordinances, is created to read as follows: I, - Sec. 28.11. Use of Skateboards, Roller Skates, In..Une Skates, Coasters, or Other Similar Devices on Public or Private Property. (1) It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride a skateboard in or upon any of the following locations: I I I (a) I I ; I' I I I ...J>' On any City street except while crossing a street on a crosswalk; Ordinance No. 6074-96 ,~ " (b) On any sidewalk within the following area: that area, except for the Pinellas County Trail, bounded on the west by the waters of Clearwater Bay, on the east by the eastern sidewalk of Missouri Avenue, on the north by the northern sidewalk of Drew Street, and on the south by the southern sidewalk of Court Street and Chestnut Street; (c) In any public parking lot or public parking garage, including the , access/egress ramp; (d) In any public access ramps or access ramps for handicapped persons providing pedestrian access to a building; and (e) On any public or private property where prohibited by cOnspicuously located signs having lettering at least two inches high, and containing as a minimum the words uNo Skateboarding." i ' (2) It is unlawful for any person to operate or ride roller skates, in-line skates, coasters, or other similar devices in or upon any of the following locations: (a) In any public parking lot or public parking garage, including the access/egress ramp; (b) In any public access ramps or access ramps for handicapped persons providing pedestrian access to a building; and (c) On any public or private property where prohibited by conspicuously located signs having lettering at least two inches high, and containing as a minimum the words uNo Skating or Coasting." (3) It is unlawful for the parent, legal guardian or custodian of a minor child to permit the child to violate the provisions of subsections (1) and (2). (4) ,It is unlawful for operators or riders of skateboards, roller skates, in-Une skates, coasters, or other similar devices to fail to yield the right-of-way to any other pedestrians or to otherwise endanger or interfere with pedestrian traffic on any street or sidewalk within the City. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING Ordinance No. 6074-96 ( .,'~ :~.....~:...:.</~t/tJ..;.t,h"" ,~. ,__aj" .- _, ..."'H.,... "...~'" .......~ ~.,. L ,~. . >. <' . PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED AS AMENDED \ Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner " Approved as to form and .' : " legal sufficiency: Attest: ~ " Cy~thia E. Goudeau City Clerk ,?" ", ,'Robert J. S reUa Assistant ity Attorney' , I; .~. .: .., ,. : ";' ',{ , ',' .\~. . " ,l, :~~. : c.. . ';;" ... . 1;' :. ;}: " , ::~r . .::- . " ". " :',~ ~, . ~.' , . . . ~~T . t ,:. :':;~~ . ~: : ' , .'1 ','. . ':"< . '. .~ \' ~,: : ". '. ':'.1, "',' ;', :~ :~'. ~ , \<'~'" : :'\.':, 'J' '., < " ,d " , i' '. ;'.' ': ' ~,'3 ' ".1, . . ;.... " ' - - !. ! \ i I J I , i 1 I 'J . I i' !:L' " :j: ~ ' '-I .r. "..' L+ i '{:'. '. I"..,', , '.~' . : !; ~'. , . ':. . i.;'~:'. . , ' '. ~ . " ':';11: " Ordinance No. 6074-96 ':'j' '.,' .' . ~:', ," ' f,' .'. ,0. 00 .... , ~;: :', . _.__'.,,~.'..,n .~_~.... _~~~T__..L._"'_"''''''''''''.<!' . . .....' ", ...... -,-,~~.~. .- ,... ~ ,~~ , , /Lo..: dqq CITY OF CLEARWAT,ER Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners . FROM: Robert J; Sure"e, Assistant City Atlomey, Police legal Advlsora?J'1 SUBJECT: Map for'skateboarding Ordinance COPIES:. Pamela'K~Akint City Attorney Elizabeth M. Oapturat City Manager " ! 1 ! \ I I 1 f ! i 1 I [ .,c}. . .. : :I:~. : '.' . . .' , . I,,', ,.' DATE: t : i" August14t 1996 Attached please find a copy of a map that depicts the location of the sidewalks in downtown Clearwater where skateboarders will be prohibited if Ordinance No. 6074-96 is adopted. <,,' -, RJS/gma' ',{\ \~, ~ " . 1: ;; ':.- " " . ~ ~' ; ,', ' " '. ;' . , I ,/' ' '1'~'~;f . : ;D-" :' "~." .: . , . , , , j I , i .' I I ' ) w ~ o ~ o .... _w_ t SJ t \')5 ::nJ 'I/E' 80 3lVQ lN3~1~'v'd3a nNI~33NI~N3 r3~ VOI~Ol.:l '~31 VM~V310 .:10 AlIO U [ -.J :Wv' ~'O:>NIl N100NI1 D~D I '" , NOS"":" I 1-'--1;'+ -- r ,"noss," ~~i J 31W ~I NOSIO'" II \" ~D]M [ NOSlo'19D~~~ 3I\V ~N, 01ONIH5'11 ~!Jw ! '" \ 'r-oNIH5'MI8 i~8 . . ~ ~ Z OOOMN]]"" V D nt;;n~Dt-D r1l 0 01-00 0 I ) U~U'" ~ LiJ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ON"'3 ~ .:;: "it HLOoad ~~ ~ 2 ~ 3M ~ ~ D ~O D~D~D~D~D~: :r: ~ ~~~ d~D 0 0 0"0 0 ODd ~0i ; D^" ~D n~D 0 DjDSV3 D~; 130~S g L-J N30.'0 ~ : iQ "JPIV ~'~IJWI 10 DOt; I~ . I L ~ eJ !>j~~31l'M 0 LJm .11 J.l6t 's. !i6!i '~rs -, === 3J\V NOSI~~VH U 1-02 E5 ~iq q CJ~D DtnCJ~ I V ~Wd 8 JAv"" V103:>50 t- I o ~DB 3!lV I-D a: u~ In ~;;e aLVll r\ ~ 'S'l'N 15 ~\\. ct \. \. ....- H.WON _.. H013>tS 30NVNIO~O O~V0831V)\S 1Vlln :IlOJ 5/'11\ .1.1I OllCJlfO ml A' """Vi/(/ z v:>l~a]~.i ~~~ 'Il'" \Jf.~ e: ~ ta Lg ~D~I 3M ~1J< 0 VlD]J\V c::J~ ;!jO:>NI1 r-7 ~ a:: ~quJ~ '--Z'o/\ VI ~ ~~o: , 0 -~- G _ _ _ _. a:: 1!i9 '~:I'S J,\V I~D~~~ o oL r-r--- a:: I 3J\V t- VI N 31\"1' [ H 8~VH'MlO ON01'V::IO )llVM3GIS ~~ dO 3003 183M I I o a:: 9 :l a:: o ~ ~D~ "O\lIWOH 'obe:: ?~ .~ l'~' ~l'. ../.""," _.....,.. ~:: Jq ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet TO: ' Commissioner J. B. Johnson FROM: Robert J. Surette, Assistant City Attorney, Police Legal Advisor f2J6 SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to Ordinance No. 607 4~96 ( , ! COPIES: Pamela K. Akin, City Attorney Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager DATE: Aug,ust 14, 1996 i: ' During our meeting yesterday, you expressed concern that the USkateboarding ordinance" was too restrictive because the ordinance, if adopted, would prohibit a person from skateboarding on any city street. You asked me if I could draft for you a proposed amendment to the ordinance that would limit the prohibition against skateboarding only to those sidewalks and streets located in downtown Clearwater. . ~; i i, ; i '. An amendment that you could propose during the first reading of Ordinance 6074w96 this Thursday evening could be as follows: I move to amend Ordinance Number 6074- 96 to delete paragraph a from subsection 1 of Section 28.11, which makes it unlawful for a person to ride a skateboard on any city street except while crossing a street on a crosswalk. I further move to amend existing paragraph b of subsection 1 of Section 28.11' to add the words Uor street" after the words "On any sidewalk." ' , " RJS/gma' " .:,\~ ; , ;1-f~.f~Ult.;.v<.."~.~... .._c. . cw. _,.....__:--"'yqo..........I~..._....~1 ~"'. "'~ ......4. t......'.., . 08/15/96 16:06 "449 2889 CLft'TR CIIAlfBER Iil 002 re ..\ ~C'Y'\ -#- d <=1 0... Rz.d..o.llll1f- ~"J'oWr cw..f/.." ~ vfD"~~~ I!--.:o-"""", a.a. Do...... m vc.s--a.~ ' AIM C-.d.I ~ DMJeI T. UUIlI VCM'~~ ~~ vI:~ ... A.1:a.~ D n- A......~ I~"'ewr- ~:=- ,...,....... "..",.t%O Board 01 DlnccGnl .... N. AWo DaWK.AMdIo aaa.B.B* "'*c:..... Clnrp)< Ib:ldIlI JuM ...... ItDt.a A-BannG .... W.Dpd MaP.CaallaII1 I1cbd"D8a" o.YId 1W.-4c. Dtau hlIIct J. Dlltft ac, I. Od)o x.-taa.~ WI1IlImIWW PkDM.~ 0.'1.... OaakaL~ AIN& N...... Jim.,)bda J. a u.n.....&. It. ~~ Aut" Morpa Fnaltv........'.m l1l& P. NktaII ~..... ~.... n.,ll. ..... n. LIIAI 1llafM;1..,.. a-w Y. SIUut DmiP. ... ..CdlcaW.d l_W_ ~J.WI&=I TAM~~,,~ 1fdu-p - August 15,1996 GREATER CLEARWATER CHAIv\BER OF COtvVv\ERCE 120 H.~Cl.AAVL P.o. llOX 2457. a.wn.'AlEAR. 0461.,. 6'1)/461.(1011. F'AJ(at~/"9-2a&9 COPIES TO' COMMISSION The Honorable Rita Garvey, Mayor and The City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 . Clearwater, FL 34617 AUG 1 5 1996 PHr:.~~ CLERK I ATTORNEY Dear Mayor Garvey and Commissioners: The Greater Clearwater Chamber of Commerce opposes ordinance 6074~ ,96. relating to skateboards and other "entertainment wheeled vehIcles" In portions of downtown. With the advent of the PineUos Trail coming through Clearwater In the wInter of 1996, the timing of this ordinance is off the mark. Other communities In PfnelJasCounty have Been an~economlc boom with the trail and much of It Is largely based on the ability of trail users to .skate- to their destinations off the trail, whether It be for lunch, a quick snack or some sun tan 011. The beach community can expect a surge of business 8S trail users go across Cleveland to the beaoh. using the trail 8S a spur. This ordinance. as Written, would greatly discourage trail users from explOring our downtown and beach community. If we wish ,to develop a user-friendly downtown with our new redevelopment plan, this would be a step In the wrong dlrecUon. Additionally, the ordinance wouid be difficult to enforce and confusing If not all properties decide to participate. The Greater Clearwater Chamber of Commerce urges you to reconsider this ordinance before taking It to second reading. 1:1 . I' RESOLUTION NO. 96-47 ]0 0-- . A RESOLUTION OF TIm CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ASSESSING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN JONES' SUB OF NICHOLSON'S, CLBARW A TER, FLORIDA, HAVING A POST OFFICE ADDRESS OF 630 DREW STREET, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AS DESCRIBBD MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, IN TIlE AMOUNT OF $425.00 FOR THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE CIty ORDERING THE OWNER TO ABATE A DANGEROUS STRUCTURE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 41 of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances and the Standard Building Code, the Building Official determined that certain real property described herein and the building situated thereon were unsafe, unsanitary, unfit for human habitation, and dangerous and detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community, and did not comply with the requirements of said Code before expenses were incurred; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater and the owner bave caused the abatement of the unsafe building, and the City's costs of such work should now be assessed as a lien on behalf of the City of Clearwater against the property; now, therefore, . BB IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF TIm CITY OF CLEARW ATBR, FLORIDA: " , Section 1. The Building Official having ordered the abatement of the unsafe building situated on the following described property: Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, Blk. 7, Lots 1,2,3 and part of vacant alley. (Parcel Number 09/29/15/44353/007/(010). .' Owners of record: Robert Schoeller & Cynthia Daniel 636 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 34616 "l. , ' :, . I . . _~'U.'.(.~,: j.Jf1\'~f~.'l.,,1-n"-'" L . .'... .. .f._~.. . . '_'~ .~.~. . , .....,., ..' . ,. 3()~ and the City of Clearwater having now completed said work, the City Commission does hereby assess and charge a lien on behalf of the City of Clearwater against - the property for the necessary costs incurred as follows: TOTAL ABATEMENT COSTS (See Attachment "A") $425.00 , Section 2.. As soon as practicable, a Certificate of Indebtedness against the property for the amount of assessment shall be prepared, which certificate shall constitute a lien prior to all other liens except the lien for taxes. Said certificate, when issued, shall be payable to the City with ~terest at a rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to prepare a Notice of Lien in the amount of tbe assessment against said property I and to record the same in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. i ' ;:' PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1996. " j::; , , , ., . il. ' l,' d Attest: ~~ . .i: (. ,,' " , , !," , Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to fonn and legal sufficiency: : ~ . ~.I' .c ~e,,--=-____. oha Carassas " A:ssistant City Attorney i',_ .~. , " c. " . , " , ' . ' .. ."."' . I~ '. ~. . I: " 3o~ ATTACHMENT II A" Resolution 96-47 (630 Drew Street - Clearwatert Florida) 1ASK TIME " , NALOL - (Pinellas County Records for ownership) Various correspondence' and telephone calls Purchase requisitions Take photographs TOTAL HOURS '.~ I EXPENSES AMOUNT ',;" ,I' " " Filmt developingt' and prints ' , Certified Mail and regular' postage , , Title Search - Sexton Title Seivicest Inc. , Asbestos Swvey . Occupational Health Conservationt Inc. $ 45.72 4.58 125.00 250.00 "',,, I I, (." " , ' ~~ : .. ~:.' J~ " '~... . " ,. . .~~. ;, TOTAL EXPENSFS- LIEN AMOUNT $425.30 $425.00 ; I , I I :;~: .- :~ .~ ,~ ". . 'Ii -:; .' .,\ . ~.: 1\ .'1"1' . " ;',' , !' t. : i , i ;~.~: : . }' I . ' " , "f:..~: . .' l,. .' ....' . :. ~ . . ..' ,~ . ., .' " " ? '. .: :~. . . .~_.--:-.,...- -" ..,'. J -,..' f" . .- ....... ...............-...."'--...-............ ,..........--........ ....._...+....~........~..p;O'..._ ..,'....~.> .... ........... -, -~.............."............ .................. ./,,: .Jo.~' J., ~ ., \",1... . ,.... '1..... '" .. ........ ~. )'.." ,". .,..~,'$.~:,.. . _...._ ~ .~...~ r ~-_ I'. , , Return to: Eart Barrett, Real Estato Manager City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater. FL 34616-4748 31 , CONSENT TO CROSSWALK ENCROACHMENT Recitals WHEREAS. AmSouth Bank of Florida (YAmSouthn) is the owner of two separate parcels of real property located in Clearwater, Florida, and described In Exhibit A and Exhibit B eBank Propertt). . WHEREAS, The City of Clearwater (the "City-) Is the owner of an Alley between the two separate Bank Property parcels, above which is constructed a pedestrian crosswalk described In Exhibit C (the .Crosswalk-). WHEREAS. AmSouth requests City to approve the existing encroachment of the Crosswalk In the Air Space above the City~owned Alley. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, AmSouth and the City hereby agree as follows: 1. Gr..an1. The City does hereby approve the existing encroachment of the Air Space above the City.owned Alley in order to utilize and maintain the existing Crosswalk, including without limitation the right to maintain, remove, repair, replace and utilize the Crosswalk without any sub right to reconfigure or relocate same; except as described herein. It Is acknowledged that all or any part of the encroachment at AmSouth's or its successor's expense should be removed If the subject Alley and Air Space is needed for any public purpose, as reasonably determined by the City . Engineer. , I I 2. INDEMNITY. AmSouth, its successors and assigns, is hereby required 'at all times and does hereby agree to Indemnify and save harmless the City from any and all claims or loss by reason of any accident or damage to any person or property happen~ngs on. about. under or as a result of the use or maintenance of the Crosswalk. 3. BURDENS RUN WITH THE LAND. The duties as to the Indemnification of the City and the duty to repair and maintain the Crosswalk shall be deemed a covenant running with the Bank Property and shall be binding upon not only AmSouth, but also upon Its successors and assigns. , over I , , 4. a~NEF1T. The rights estabfished. created and granted hereunder are . restricted sOlely to the owner from time to time of the Bank Property and not to the general public and. accordingly. saId owner may from time to time temporarily close all or any portIon of the Crosswalk In such manner as to prevent a dedication thereof to the public or an accrual of any rights of any person other than as aforesaid or in the publ1c generally. . 5. NON-INTERFERENCE WITH PUBLIC WAY. The approval of the encroachment is expressly subject to the rights of the public to use the Alley as a publ1c way, and the Crosswalk will be maintained and repaired In such manner as to not impede Ingress and egress across and through said Alley to all members of the public for public way purposes so long as same shall be an alley dedicated to the publ1c. 6. JERMINA TION. The approval of the encroachment is to utilize the Crosswalk and Air Space described herein and is only for the benefit of the existing structures on the Bank Property. Any reconfiguration or rerocation of said structures shall terminate this Consent to Crosswalk Encroachment. IN WJTNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives this day of .1996. AMSOUTH BANK OF FLORIDA By: Its: STATE OF ALABAMA ) JEFFERSON COUNTY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of I 1996. by Stephanie Walker, as Vice President of AmSouth Bank of Florida; a state banking corporation; on behalf of said corporation. Such person did take an oath and: (notary must check applicable box) . . is personally known to me. produced a current produced driver's license as identification. as identification. !,.- I Signature of Notary i " : ; Name of Nota.ry Typed. Printed or Stamped 2 ", < . ., ','. . I' , I ': " , , I', " ',\ I::' , .' ! ,~ ::.', " " I';". ' ',' .' . ,SIGNATURE PAGE FOR CONSENT TO CROSSWALK ENCROACHMENT 3 f Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: Elizabeth M. Deptula City Manager Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form and , legal sufficiency: Attest: John Carassas, Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau. City Clerk STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) ) BEFORE ME personally appeared Rita Garvey, the Mayor-Commissioner of the above- named city, _ who acknowledged that she executed the foregoing instrument. She is personally known to me and did not take an oath. WITNESS my hand and official seal this 199 day of , Printrrype Name: Notary Public STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) BEFORE ME personally appeared Elizabeth M. Deptula, the City Manager of the above- named city, who acknowledged that she executed the foregoing instrument. She is personally known to me and did not tal<e an oath. WITNESS my hand and official seal this 199 day of '. PrinVType Name: Notary Public , :c . 3 'aVe.r- , ' I ' ., ~ < " " "T. . ',' , , ,,. t" .:~ , :." 1 , ~ ..... .. I. or: :<~': . '!ij; >:', I....,~ < :" , ..i:.:<p. .,'~ l: 'J' ~Q'::' :. :Xtt,:~' ij~:... , ."f ," . ~.. :,J;,ti.' .'. ~ i':.' 'J'-4f :;/!;~. . ~_, 1 ':'~ t. t.':~ . .' ,.< :;. " i: ~ , ':1. , ' , ;. ~.~\r~ .~,! Lt..: ~ I' . t .~ ~.. . ~.~~:. . ," .;~ .': '. >: .. ~ . .~. . . .,', ','. < .( "r': ",' '; ~:\.. ,"el,'! "1.;- 'j"' " . .~ . . .~~l.~~l~ " . ....: .......1 ",.". , j" o . EXHIBIT A TO CROSSWALK AGREEMENT . Lots' 1 and 2 of Ear! and Tates Subdivisiont a subdivision according to ,the Record Plat ,thereof recorded in Plat Book H.1, page 20, in .,the.puhlic Recorda of Pinellas County, Florida .. , :" , .J " ' , , I ~ ~ ' . . .' ',"t,.' : , . . ~ . . ," >. . ,< ~ ~ . ~ ,; :,t " , ; '! " , I I I I 1 \ I ! I I l \ ' i I i . , , I I I' j, , I > . '," , ~ ~.(~ . ~. . 'd ".. ~ -:tt. . \. ..." : ~. " ' r,:;..", ;'~ ~: .", "{;., r. " j.!. l' ~. ~!~~t .,. .0 ," . ~:~ ~ <. ',;/, ~~Z:;, . > ~ir . ," ,," :; ~. . " ;1.'"' ,-, ~ ;.< :.:C}' ".'( ,. , " c ~ . ~ ,,. . ! ," {~ ;." . .,.cr; il::/;.',., I r; ',; 1',./,;'" ~~:;/,~ ' ';\ :;..,. ,L . ~. ;S'l <.~:.: . ;fT(: '(,.,. ..' ~. . , ~ l . . r~~r'," ':,', ' .:::'~: !' .~ ,-: ROO. '",T"':':'4' ~~, . >0 .,A' .~ I', ," - 1< ! ' 3J , ,( EXHIBIT B TO CROSSWALlt AGltEEMltNT , ,'l~ot9 7 and 8 of Earl And Tates Subdivision, a subdivision according '". > to the Record Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1. page 20, in the 'Public Recorda of Pinellaa County, ,Florida, ~ r ! \ I , < . I . ~ .- ~ I I j' \ . I .; . ;\' , ~ . " j . ,> ". j I, i ' ' l ! . , , . ,.', . I I. ..I / . . \ ; t . -I' . " i I \ i i ( , ' I' I l I. , '" ;, . , o \}-{ r . .. Exhibil "e" AIR RIGHTS EASEMEN T FROM CITY OF CLEARWATER TO AMSOUTH BANK LYING' FROM 12.5 FEET TO 28.5 FEET ABOVE THE CURRENT ASPHALT ALLEY WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: The East 35 feet of that portion of 10 foot olley, conveyed to City of Cleorwater by an Instrument recorded in Deed Book 722, Pages 459 through page 461. and modified by instruments recorded in Officiol Record Book 744, pages 541 through page '544. lying in Lots 1 and 7 of Earll and Tote.s Subdivision os recorded in Plot Book 1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Part of EARLL & TATE'S Subdivision, (Plat Book 1. Page 20) LAURA ST. so' 50' 7 8 :> a.R. oe( 744-541 <( 35.0' ....J 0 5 " W U en 0 i I . Z ,. D.E. . " 722-459 1 2 50' so' CLEVELAND ST. S.R. 60 NOTE: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY NOT TO SCALE Section: 16-29-15 airwalk.dwg Drown by': PWD Dote: 8715/96 .:. ~':J~:i ~~~;'~~1I"\f~'''~1i4 ~.. tlp...I~'''''''''''~' '_iI" 'r"''''''~'''' .......~ ~:+-{\O , ' i, I :, ~ 13 I om ~ 0- \0 Os U ~ e ~ i - 8 .. II") g - ~ ~ ... III .- en Sh to) I ~ I) ~ F CIJ o 0 'L:2 00 ~ 00 ::e ~ ~ d-~ 00 re ~ CIJ ~ en I:: o O.::l B It:: ~ CI '"' ~ jj g. ~ "l:) a 't4 ~ i ~ aJ c:l ~ ~ 0 c i l~ I S5~ Ou ~ al ~ .~- ~ ~ z ~.~~ gco "O,~ ~ 'U' ~u=bJ) a ~8C1Jj.a cu = 'e ~ it "l:I g ~u~"B~ CI 8- - ~~~~'5. ~ ~.. 1! 0 e:: fa E! ~ ~ -e .i 8 u -< z ~ ::J ~ ,5 0 0 - N ... 6 cd o~ i 8 l '::l"'O 'C = 'D CU~ o'B-os = ,5 ,~ ~ ] .8 os. ~ a ~ c 0- ...."'Ou~Hia fJ~ - CI.o ~ 5 15.5=" 11 i ~e oc S ~~~e'ij;a.!l:u on '> 5.c 8. ~ .~ oN 'j 1 , ~,~ ~ a ~ ~ n CI.o rl e:: 8- e '"' 1t~ ce:: .g cS ~.!!.a '"" ~ -cnU .... cu.- .8 '$ 0 oS -5 ~ Ot ~ ~O'::e 8 CIJ -e 8- A::c 'cu_ c:~ B ~ ~ u ::s~~~:....: .... ~~!~~~ c:: ~ := u \U oS &.. ~ ~ C - ~ 0 t: ~ en ~ S 0- ~ rn"E 8 .3 I) u oS < c: 0 = as \0 ~ ~ i lU 1:2 \n -8, N ao t::: =' - - Oi I~ ;j Q.I \0.9 .c - O\C u - o~_ ~ E= Me:: 0 ;;:i~ :8 V ~~p.. t= ~ I - , I ~ .. . 1 . . -. ~ , " ~ M 0\ !l ~'Q ~~~ ~1! ~.w-S .19 ! ~~10104 ~C'iC"'i c:: o . '~f~R ! ~3l d.il ~;:g~ afOrJJe! :j 1 tori 'B~ b ~~ ~ ~~ t3 c B~~'@~ rJJ 'S ~ '>. 'S ~ a \0 ~ e;..;; " :ab.O ~1~- ~ !i I.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ \0 0\ ~ - - "'S '1 '0 .8 s ... g a..~ rJJa 'M'- .s u ' . o :g b.O ._ OJ 00 >. ~ 8..a ~.~ t:... .E a ~ fa.J:S :J ~ U ~ fA 5 ~ .~ ~ 0 e g ~ ~ ~ii! .~ S = -5 .~ ~ .ff:a ~ ti"B :a g ~,~ ~ ~ .~ ~ e s !3 e F .rJJ ~ ~ 11 'fa ~ Q ~.~ u o~..5 ::"'~'o u~~o=B'f: Eell:;:':: ~l$ ooStS ~8.IIJ-g 0 ~ ~ il~~l; -a~~3! .8o.:J~CIJ e:l~;B~3 ii' ~ ~ ~ \0 ~ t::! 0\ .. I 'a ~ ~ OJ) 'g ~ .~ 6' rJJ g ~'-'~'e ~o~~~ \0 0\ r:: - (:3 - ~ ~ ..... ,~ ~>. ~>. >. : I ~ l f~ ~ --ac3 ,~ ~8e8 = 8 ... s >.8 8 0) 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~~8d:$3~$3 ..: N~ .; lri rJJ 8 ~ lU ~.- .s ~"Q ~,g ~ rJJ I -s 0 ~ _ ~._ = .... 0\ rJJ :>.. ~ @ ~ =' ~ 'M ::s oW' ~ ~ 0 0.... &:: !l >. Go) i1 e 6 U.E 5..0 .~ >. =' '.::l 4) ~ a"'g .: u 0 e c:: oS OJ'o ~ 1:: ~ c..... 8: ~ Q..'i OJ 0) -5= ';;J... >= - 's- 'M.... 0 0 Q.) <OJ o~cQ.o.c ~ ~ ... 5 OJ e ~] OJ ~u r 5iia8 ~ ee~-a~ :i:~u:~~ ~ -5 's en .c: c.o l:E fj =' tIJ \0 0\ - N - 0Cl I ~E ~~.~8 _ t"""":= ~ Co. rP ~ ::J ~.9C.5 Jej\ 0 ~ 0'\ - 0\ J n ~ '.6 bl) e g.~ ~ . "0 1:" ~ ~""'f5rn JiJI)! -fN~ ~ ~~ as ~ 0 G oil Z d ~~::~~5 o _ > ~~~li~< s ti'~~l~ "B5e~ e a:iS~O_~ Wltn ~ r::: O[ 'C o ~ 0'" ~. ~~~~ t .- '.3 e] < 0,) &!~~e!~)1 ~ts:i~!] b ~ .c: u ~ \0 ~ 00 N ~ IJg I "B ~ ~tt~ 'D 0\ t: - - . o vr .s ~ ~ ~ v, ,g e ~ lU 8 . tI) &.;rIlO ~ ~~s t:l 6 8'~ 6 - j~J:S ~u~ 8j >.sii! s~ ~ N~~"; "0 .5 -1i =' ~ ~~gl ~:a 0 0' :t j .~ .g .~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ bOO-ocS OJ e.:::l I:: I:: ~ ::s 'cd cd._ = a i! ~ ~ ~ o 1oloi 0 1: ] ~1'~~ ~~~r;8 .s ~""'S: ~ .~ .-:= u 8 > CH~ ~ (I) ~ o "8 .r::: u ... .s o :> \0 0\ N - - 00 8 I 'S ~> I ~ 19.,c -~e O'ii~ U-tc~ ~_tI) bI) "Q~"'l:IrIl i c:.5 8 0 ~ 1;1 i OJ.... ~ lOJ .8 '5>rIl ti: M '[~ ~ ~ll"B .~ j ~ ~ c.:: ~ p., ~ p.,.- u - ::::s <!So. OJ :::l "d OJ oS '::I -0 0 \n ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~;;; " = - .. rIl = o '.0 ~.~ OJ = S =' e e ~e .8 - en g :3 ~bO ::=.13 ~~ ~~ N OJ -g i c ~ .. ' .S ~ ~ Us = u. F= asU";i P. ~ ::s~:5! !11.l-c ~ en ~'::S .s ca .0. .c::t"ga ~ ~e.g ~ Ul ~ 61.g e ~i~li = U ~ ~"d.- OJ OJ g :;, ~ 5 = ~~ a g] ~:e.~ ~ ~ € ~=.cbO= ~~c.o!;:oc=~~ lL~ -8. ~ ~ ~ N E ~ ~.s e ~ ~ ,g Q :a I:. U C i-o 0. ,E OJ Cd.~ e "d Po r:; ~ :s ~ B i.i:: 61 8.~ ~ 5.g. ~ 8 g '0 ~ t:I , ~ ~:s2] '" crllOJ8 .~ ~ ~ .~!= 1lJ.!!~~ ~U""OJ '=cd= e .~ :.=.~ ~ i:;~~QO = ~ e .- ..... \0 0\ M - - 00 .t: ~~ '~~ -1rt8 ~I] . ~ ~ 2s - "B .~ tl "'0 .8 .s en b. .- .... U 5 bDQ)E .13 oS B ~....s -g cS en ~n~ ~.~! en '" ~ .~ E e 's.; P :g.- 8'::I::S .~ rJ'J ii ~ en ~ .~ ~~ ~ ~~~B~ en d '>. ~ ~ ..., 1,,0 0'\ ~ ~ 00 I ;] ~ 'C: ~f3 \DCIJ -... C-4~ ga~ - ;g o 'J:l IS ~ti !!!!! 0\ Q. I \0'" 0'10 O\~ - I:: 0\8 o. ..( D 5 o t::l.. >. p.. fr ~... o. ~ .c ~ :tf "3 ~ .~ d5 aU 1a~ tI:I co. e:- ..Jog~e~~ 10m .; ~ ~ ~ ~;]Q. tI:I:C \0 ~ ~ rd ~ ] ~ 4U bJ) e Po. .5i o o(S 'f r=~l:i ~ ~o. ~ ~ .~ ~ ~~~'QO' ~ ~~~ -4N~ ~vi ~ C"'irti~ B "t3 t! 5S~~ . tI.:I _ cu l';oOCUbl) .- oS i:': ~ r \ ..... . . -...- "0 utUO:8Ci) oS bI) >0 I:: 1;; .~~ -: .~ .- .o.~ Q) ~ ~ ~ jf~ ~ ~ 'Q 'E~ 861::JaB ti! 0 :g iL~ >-~ < C;~ u ~~~~i ~ "0 :::I o " Q) ~ ~ \0 ~ ("of - 00 n I'''' \0 ~ ~fI') 00... \0 In ........~ ~~ ."\ . I"".""'. ~~ .... .... cn 0 '€ en Q.) :3 >.~ ~ > . 8....:3 .~ cS 5 ~ ~!3 :a5~ p.. ~ '0 ~ D 1:::s2 $: 0.0 BV)t:~ ~~~~~::a :r:.8c~~S fl')PtU.c~ .... c ca.- 0 'ii N .c '3 .... ~~fI')~::S &... S: tt:: ~ \0 ~ ~ 00 8 I .... \0 0.0 c= O'\cU .;.. . in fI') ("'e ~ - 0 Q..~ ~ is 'Obi) << ~ ~ <:3 - Q) e '.0 tn :s 4.> "' i o .fa = :::I ca =~= c .... 0 {2 .S ~ c >. VI u 0 rd' J1 ] 'E .~ ~ e 5 ~ 5 0 :'c 0.0 5 ~ ; 8. c - t::l.. . '.0 0.. B . . :1 a .5 ~ j .0 -g =8 Q) Q) ~ o tU -s oS en - t!.. 8 N' -..... .... ..... = :::I~ 5 e -c::E-;; r:r:: C!..g Q) a c8rd~Q) rdfas1aQ ~ca::Ee ~ii:.s ti: ~ ~ CU :c '5 Q \0 ~ 00 C! 00 c:: . 0 VI \0 'J:l ~ 0\ ..... s.... C I~CCO - ~ cu :::> .- 00 e ~ - ~"'Q) ~ "a~~ ~ ga~..sfa8 \0 ~ ~ 1;; I . ....... bJ) I:: .... - ';1 . ::ss ~ rn '3 e ]~ :s~ N j ~ .s =:: . M Q) 't:) .... .E! .. ~. g ~~ ~'O Q)~ .... ~'.c ~ fa e e =='C = 'f '.0 'i ~ 8 ~ l-!i :;J 8. E ~ .5 en ;r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~.~ .B S.-.S :3 cuenen"Ot::"t3 ~ 8. 8..:E s e Q. ..... ~ o 5 ~:.::: b.O 5 o.o~- c -g8~a~s ~ en S.g ~ gf E.E-9sua ~~~&5~i5 o @ "0 :::I ~ e (:. I,() 0\ 0\ M r::: I \0 0\ o to- '"', -~ ~ ~ ga.s I "t ~ ~ - o - 13 1 "0 .8 S ,gi iB QcA-t "0" fi 6 1 FSJ6 'ii.i! "U Il ~ 2"0 A-tSC'lS \', . - - -~ c'i QSH- =8~e ~c:::og8 !J~! c::: ~' ~ ,! \0 0\ - ('f'), - ~ I~ "8 1 "0 .8 B fa ~.s 't) CC;~€a~ '.8n~~a It1Ji Q '5 ~ Q] 5~ -e ~ =- ~ ' Ja 0 a ~[~.s]~.~e ~ a == CI:l u::E > '; c:c t:l &.c ~S~~~~ u i c 8 \0 ~ . ~ f c::: .If Qc.. b.O.! a Bit !~il ~jl~] ~~~l " ... ~\O 8~ 13 c:: .~ "0 .8 g ..J u 'E U) :a ~ u ), ~ ~ "0 '::1 .- IS '1 c:: -ei ~=~ .s ::S'S 'E ~ fr ~~~6~~ lU .., .c :::=@"O"'u ~3<~~~ I "? ,I " -e ,~ ::s .c tI) t:l ~ \0 0'1 Oi ., ~ e.o c:: ,8 .g .8 ~ ='6' .- 1;; X. I E 0 ~~~l:i ~ozet~ - I' AOO-14-1996 16: sa FRa1 CLEARWATER CL TV toriR. CFI= . .7CJ.lNSON TO P. e1/eU 33~ CI,.YOF CLEARWATER Inte~rtrnental eo......pondonoe TO: Mayor and CommissionCrs FROM: . Cynlbla B. Goudeau, City Cler& SUBJECI': CRA Legislation te'DDB paying TIP COPIES: Blizabetb. Deptula. City Manager Kathy S. Rice. Deputy City Manager/ln1erim eRA Director DATE: August 14. 1996 I am still com~ people n::gm:ding the possibility of proposing legislation to exempt the DDB (DoWD.t.OWll Development Board) from paying the TIP (Tax Increment Flnaucing) to the eRA (C~ Redevelopment AaencY). However. I thought I should let you know that so far the reaction has not been favorable. Carol Marcbner of the PLC (Florida League of Cities) indjroted the FLC and the FRA (Florida Redevelopment Association) WODld oppose both total exemption of DDBs and the reopcniDa of the Window for application for ~tiO:n- The redevelopment director of Daytona Beach said they too, would oppose both efforts. Daytona Beach has both a CRA and DDB. The ~P~:paY8 the CRA the TIF. Ms. Matcbnet provided additional N1J1leK for me to contact. I have attempted to do 80 but have been unsuccessful thus far. If you have any questions. please let me know. TOTfl.. P.131 08/14/96 16:00 TX/RX NO.0270 P.OOl . ~ : t/~ of eteo,pJafd ......~:a::~:W'JI~~ .......~~;:. ~:~..-=-- Interoffice Correspondence Sheet Kathy Rice, Deputy City Manager b.~' '3~O- To: Betty Deptula, City Manager; From: too Margaret Simmons, Finance Director ~ cc: Tina Wilson, Budget Director Date: July 11, 1996 RE: eRA 1997 Budget, 1996 Year-To-Date Actual (9 months), Funds Available for Bond Issue Defeasance, Debt Service Schedules, etc. Attached please find the schedules you requested: 1. The 1996 Actual Year-To-Date (9 months) and proposed 1997 Budget. Please note that no adjustments to the current year budget have been proposed at this time. We must. go back to the eRA with budget amendments specifically stating where excess funds will go (Debt Service Fund or Redevelopment ProJects). There are 2 sheets; one details the administrative expenditures which carries forward to the administrative expenditure line on the other page. This budget was prepared assuming the bonds are not defeased. Also note that there are additional transfers required to the debt service fund in 1997 (in excess of 20% of tax increment revenues) in order to properly fund the debt service reserves. Total transfers for debt service in future years (if the bonds are not defeased) will need to be approximately $240,000. 2. I have attached a calculation of the tax increment revenues (1996 actual and 1997 projected) . ,l \ 3. eRA Debt Service Requirements - This schedule details the principal and interest payments for each bond issue by fiscal year. 4. fund 214 - CRA Debt Service Fund - This schedule projects revenues needed and expenditures in the debt service fund and calculates the required reserves. 5. Funds Available for 1986 Bonds - This schedule states the funds that are available currently for the defeasance of the 1986 bonds. Note that there is n shortage of approximately $368,483. 6. Downtown Redevelopment - This project details funds available in the redevelopment project. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. .. ..1. ~ ., - " ~,~ ~c "_J >.....". ,_..... .'. " 01/11/96 City of Clearwater CLEARWATER COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Proposed Operating Budget Fiscal Year 1996.97 (1) (2) 131 Col 3 . Col 1 FY1996 FY1997 FY1996 Year-to.Date Proposed Budget Budget 19 monthsl Budget lne (Deel Revenues and Other Financing Sources: Tax Increment Revenues: Pinellas County 149.749 , 48,659 129,800 ( 19,9491 City of Clearwater 132.428 131,463 115,390 (17.0381 Downtown Development Board 26,960 23.540 23.540 282.177 307,082 268,730 (13,4471 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings on Investments 15,000 30,671 60,000 45,000 Interest Earnings on Debt Reserve 10,000 0 110.000) Rental Income - G!rden Ave Garage 15,750 1 1,813 15,750 0 Rental Income - Station Square Parking 6,000 4,644 6,000 0 Prior Years Worldng Capital 10,000 10,000 89.911 79,911 Downtown Development Board.Atrium 6,544 7,159 7,160 616 Other Income 50 315 400 350 Total Revenues 345.521 371,684 447,951 102.430 Expenditures: Economic Development Administrative 159,097 102,516 46.320 (112,777) Miscellaneous 200 5 200 0 Saturday Downtown Parking - Street 15,000 11,250 15.000 0 Harborvlew Center Parking 6,360 4,770 6,360 0 Advertising 10.000 12,679 10.000 0 Prof Services 15.000 9,572 10,000 (5,0001 Downtown Development Board 26,960 23.540 23,540 Transfers IIN){Out: For Funding Redevelopment Projects 3,978 0 13,9781 For Debt Service Requirements Fund 214 . 20% of Tax Increments 56,436 61,416 53,746 (2.6901 Additional Debt Service Funds Required 156,935 156.935 Reimburse General Fund - Adm expense 3,600 2,7pO 50,000 46,400 Reimburse General Fund. JollV Trollev 50.000 37,500 50,000 0 Parking Fund - Checkers, Inc 4,850 3,637 4.850 0 Parking Fund - Garden Ave Garage 21.000 15,750 21,000 0 Total Expenditures and Transfers Out 345.521 288,756 447.951 102,430 Excess of Revenues & Other Financing Sources Over Expenditures and Transfers Out 0 82,928 0 0 " ~~ll{~~...~~~k----"""- .. ..,. "r''''~'''>'''~.I'L'''\..'''''''.}~~ ." .- ,-' ....~., ._ City of Cl..rwltat' File: 1 BBBUD_A CLEARWATER COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 07111196 Adminiltr.tivl Expllf1ditures 11 :01 Propoled Budgot. Fiteal Yosr 1998-1997 m 12) 131 FY1996 FY1997 ICol,3. Co11) FY1996 Ytllu.to.Oate Propaud Budget EXDenditure Oe,criDtion Budget 19 monthal Bud"lt Inc 10ecl PERSONAl SERVIC;E 5101 Seloriol &. Wagel FT 102,820 4.797 0 (102.820) 5102 Sal.riel & Wagel PT 30,296 0 5104 Special PlY 0 20,000 0 0 5105 Overtime Salary 0 101 0 0 5105 VlC8tion Loav. 0 9,365 0 0 5107 Sick leave 0 1,640 0 0 6127 Holiday Tim. 0 3,115 0 0 5201 Emp Lifelnlurancll 14 6 0 (141 5203 Emp SAMP Ufe Inlurance 258 84 0 (2581 5204 Emp Major Medical 4,620 2,044 0 14.6201 6206 Emp Social Security 6,863 4,620 0 18.8631 . 5207 Emp Ponsion 0 122 0 0 5209 Workefa. Componc.ation 330 0 13301 5210 Oislbility Insurance 360 177 0 (3601 TOTAl. 115.265 76.366 0 1115.2651 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE 5301 Profes,ional SefViess 1 ,000 1.000 1,000 5303 Contractual SefVicel 1,000 4.678 0 11 ,0001 5425 POltage 300 20 300 0 5432 Other PrM1otion Activities 750 356 750 0 15434 Printing Ii Binding 1,750 999 1,750 0 5441 Rantal- Equipmont 610 656 1.000 390 6442 Rentel. Building 5,400 4,050 6.400 0 5462 Equip Svc &; Repair. Other 100 180 200 100 5472 Emp Exp . Travel 5,880 321 6,000 IBBO) 5473 Emp Exp. Auto Allowance 650 93 650 0 5474 Emp Exp. Meal. 100 100 0 " + 5501 Otrico Supplies BOO 212 800 0 5504 Operating Supplies 2,350 718 2,350 0 5571 Mambeflhip &. Subscriptns 2,500 1.073 2.500 0 5573 Tr.iniog & Reference 2,000 320 2.000 0 TOT At 24,190 14.674 23,800 1390) INTERNAl SERVICE 5402 Document Reproduction 3.000 1,883 3,000 0 6403 Telephona SvcNaritlble 2.650 729 2,650 0 5404 Messenger SefVice 1,230 927 1,230 0 5406 Telephone SvclFixed 1.B40 870 1.840 0 6407 Postal SeMca 1,800 442 1,800 0 5409 InlUrance Admin 410 306 600 190 5410 Computar Info Svc 4,170 3.726 4,170 0 5413 Pmt Shop 1,200 13 1.200 0 6414 Purchasing Service 262 300 38 5416 Bldg & Meint.Veriable 150 433 1300 450 ,> 5420 Employee Relations 130 99 130 0 5421 Uti/itills . Telllphana 172 600 500 5422 Utilities. Electric 1.200 1,067 2.000 800 5423 Gas. WetGl lie Utilities 600 684 1.000 400 TOTAL 18,642 11.35 ! 21,020 2.378 CAPITAl 5642 Fumiture &. Offico Equipment 500 1,000 500 5858 Construction Materia's 500 125 500 0 TOTAL , 1.000 125 1.600 500 , ..' CRA Administrative Expmllll 159.097 102.516 46.320 n 12.7771 -.-.....~; -/.! ..~ ,~;_ .L:..>.:.,t1.......--~~.... ~ ~ . . I . < ..~ . Tax Incremonts & DDB Payments.96.97 7/11196 CLEARWATER COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Projection of Tax Increments & DDB Payments , For Preliminary Budget W orkpapers - FY 1996/97 Final Fiscnl 95196 Prelim Fiscal 96/97 Valuation 1/01/95 Valuation 1/01196 eRA Base Year $ 84,658,490 $ 84,658,490 Current Tax Roll Valuation 113,037,640 109,437.490 (1/01196 for fiscal 96/97) Anticipated Future Adjustments: (1) (2) Current Adjusted Taxable Value 113,037,640 109.437.490 Taxable Value Increment (Current less Base Year) 28.379,150 24.779,000 County Share. Millage Rate 5.5140 5.5140 County amount due eRA @ 95% $ 148.658.50 $ 129,799.84 City Share - Millage Rate 4.9018 4.9018 City amount due CRA @ 95% . $ 132,153.47 $ 115,388.62 DDB Share. Millage Rate 1.0000 1.0000 DDB amount due CRA @ 95% $ 26.960.19 $ 23,540.05 ...................................a....................a............. DDB Payment Pursuant to 10/11/83 Agreement: Base Year Value $ 227,800 $ 227.800 Current Year Valuation: Building 16/29/15/32292/018/0010 Garage 15/29/15/54450/006/0011 Total Valuation 6,682,800 850.000 7,532.800 7.305.000 1.0000 7,305.00 (146.10) 7.158.90 $ 6,691;000 850.000 7,541,000 Incremental (Current valuation less base year) 7.313.200 DDB Millage Rate 1.0000 DDB Tax LaBS 2% Tax Collector Fee 7,313.20 (146.26) Amount Due CRA $ 7,166.94 .- ~:w-:t~~..i".\'N'" n~.~~"'.~ "',~~. . '. _ .4 .' c> _..... ..,' < .,-J-T .~< . ~ >. Sheen eRA Debt Serv\cei Requlrementa Preparecl719196 18U '"U. (O".g.) 1987 'Iflue (land) Total Total P&I Due O.t, Principal Interest Principal Interest PrIncipal Interest 3/1196 12,922,50 12.922.50 .....,196 67,997.50 67.997.50 911/96 150,000.00 12,922.50 150,000.00 12,922.50 I: 1011196 5,000,00 67.997.50 5,000.00 67,997,50 5,000.00 135,995.00 150.000.00 25,845.00 155.000.00 161.840.00 316,840.00 3/1197 6,847.50 6,847.50 .....,197 67,802.50 67,802.50 9/1197 165,000.00 6,847.50 165.000.00 6,847.50 1011197 5.000.00 67,802.50 5.000.00 67,802.50 15,000.00 135,605.00 165,000,00 13.695.00 170.000.00 1019,300.00 319,300,00 .....,198 67,602.50 67,602.50 1011198 125,000.00 67,605.50 125,000.00 67.605.50 125,000.00 135,208,00 260,208.00 o4J 1 /99 62,"77.50 62,4n.5O 1011/99 135,000,00 62,477.50 135,000.00 62.4n.50 135,000.00 124,955.00 259,955,00 " 411/00 56,875.00 56,875.00 l," 1011/00 150,000.00 56,875.00 150,000.00 56.875.00 150,000.00 113,750.00 263,750,00 <U1101 50,575.00 50,575.00 1011101 160,000.00 50,575,00 160.000.00 50,575.00 > ~ 150,000.00 101,150.00 261,150,00 .....,102 <13,775.00 43,775.00 1011102 175,000,00 <13,775.00 175,000.00 43.775.00 175.000.00 87.550.00 262,550,00 .....,103 36,337.50 36,337,50 1011103 . 190,000,00 36,337.50 190,000.00 ' 36.337.50 190,000.00 72.675.00 262,675.00 411104 28,262.50 28,262.50 1011104 205,000.00 ' 28,262.50 205,000.00 28,262,50 205.000.00 56,525.00 261,525,00 411105 19,5SO.00 19,550,00 1011105 220,000.00 19,550.00 220,000,00 19,550,00 220,000.00 39,100.00 259,100.00 4/1106 10,200,00 10,200,00 1011106 240,000.00 10,200.00 240,000.00 10.200.00 240,000.00 20,400.00 260,400.00 " , " Page 1 . .' ,,- + 't..... .........w..... , _ "",.,. ,.".~"..~, "P. r . .,.f......r , " ::~~.: ': .' ]j~~~~ lii dai 'cO r;.~~lCiln .... I() m, 0If .... . ~. . < ' . : t:gl ~" ~lS~ ~ ... ... ~~~~ mttf~~~ .... ~~~~ .... .~ ~, ~ ~~~ N 0 ~ ... u. I() l .... i 2' hl~ ~ u. :~ n: 'I: C i ~ j~-~ ~ ...., . '."";,: .' c ..... '. ' IP,." ,. . "". . " , :, .' :' , " .. ", I . I ~: . . << , , , J , :! "', n' ' j .(~I~ 0: ,~ C ~ j~_u. ~ o '. { '" ", " " " , , Ij i1 11 i1 I,".' . a Ie ~ ... 8 .... , , I() I() ~.:' , ',~ 'N co ai ~ ~ ' , ~ .... 0If ,:i' ... .... ...1' ~ fi .... ai N ~I>:', ' m .... ... '.'E . .... M I() ".' , ," ~ I' . " " ,~~ ~a 8~ lqa ~~5H~ 88 :t. :' , Sf '....co ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~...: ft.; ~~. ..". . ~. )E , ' ~1O ' ',ca'.... ~~ cDfi~~ ~o " ;.. ...co ..... N ::'/': .... .... ~ -, ' ' II II l tnn ::, .'_H J 18 ~ 18 I ',):. ... llll .... t~~ " e .... t; e ~ ~ t~~, ~~1 ,.. l~ 1~ ., ~ > : l.r~i I IC · · · I I .t\: . c:! I o.mmm~ u, ~ . . l! ~ ~~>>I ~~"f l! ~ (J j_.... r>- 0....... O:LI._ j............. !-.... tB ',' I }' 13 ," , .., 11 11 N j'! , J I c :':'l.' I ~ ~ 1 ~ ,': . ' , '1 ~:~.~~; .~ 0: tB 0. 0: LI. 0. ..' , . . '1,. ~. , ' . , :;:', .... ' 'to -, , ' , i, " \ ) ; , j , , I ! , j , I ~ i, I. ! i .... t ~ : . I I i i I I, . ,~ ~ ~ " ;: " " : .~ .J ,:\ ',J " " . ,', 1.~ ~f. ,\ " , .I~ .; : I i: .. ; I ',' , , I " ,,' ~. '; '.' ~ ~ " .~~ " ~:~ ;~ .; - .:",,', ',7*". ~': .' , .', . " ./ . " ":1' . ~ . . '; '.:, :>~ . \:' .. ~. ~ :' "/.:'. . >: ~ ':~ ,.. " - \," .,:. . . . " '.iJ '. : ,'I I...., T' '," .' . '.' '( ,: , .', " " .~ '. ," -', " , 4' " .' ~..' ". ," '" .,,:...' i' Funds Available for 1986 Bonds City of Clearwater. CRA Prepared 7/10/96 fund 188 , Fund 214 This fund has approximately $82,928 which is bUdgeted for current year operations, ' 5,000 Reserve for Principal due 10/1/96 5,000 Reserve for Principal due 10/1/97 14AOO Additional Reserve 135,605 Reserve for'lnterest due 10/1/97 257,450 Reserve for Future Debt Service 417,455 This fund also has $67,997,50 for Interest on the 1986 bond Issue due 10/1/96. This fund also has $150,000 for principal due on the 1967 bonds on 9/1/96 and $165,000 due on 9/1/97 (final payment), It also has $26,617.50 for (nterest due on the 1987 bonds (9/1/96, 311/97 and 9/1/97 (final payment)). 856.262 Project 315-94714 Downtown Redevelopment (unspent funds) , " Lund 315 .1 { 'j t , , ' 1,273.717 Total Cash Available ! I' 1,610,000 Bonds Outstanding 32,200 2% Call Premium (this reduces to 1% on 10/1/96) 1,642,200 Principal Amount Due , ~~~8'''''~d_~.J;fw:;r'ft~n rwmt~!WM'illW!m~~~m~M'~~mU~m~&l%mooawruw~ ,I ~....1Xt~, ,OJ~J.tdHf~~~1J~%J;1.:w~~~'~~>.un:...~i;~m;.%.~~~ ~ : , i \ il " :; , '. -, '. '. .,j .;F'" .". j'. ~I .' 0.' .,.. , _ l\', ~,;~"~', ~.~>. : .,e " , .t ":' '1. .,' I . .,' "'l'", ..~ '. ..' .,.... .~~;:.~ '~ . . :'.;,: ' '" '. '~c ,r, , r,..;, :. < f' . '.J:- , .' . , c ~, :'./:' . .~?!~ '. ~. " J.":~' ~ ..' "1 . : ~ :. ' . ~- " I., . ..,'. . . ., .~: :'\.: ' . ,~ . '.' , .1:. , "...... .. ~ , ,. - .. ". ! ',\1.,"':' :;,}, ,....".... './0 .'>1,.: ~ Y: ' ~; . .' , " ..~ d . . ..,.;" :\':;,,; '.', ~!r:. ' J.. ,..' , ;~:'; ~,. . .':.:;). ' .\..., ' '.,', :. ~~~;':';'..'::,;.::."::,..,:,, " :. :.i"'~' :!' ..., ~}' ,;:'; .',l' ,".' .' \ ::.',.. :_,. c' 'J' . , I~', : '.' , ,:~~:,X . /":~~'~ ',:: < ~::')':..~:'>: . .,.. ..,' '. .,1.::.\' 'Ii:r, . h , ~i:/;'< ::: ~~?':'.t< :. ~'''''. . ~";'rl.i-l.~'i~!","""'. " , " :1 ' , , ( , '1 ',' ;, .'. "" '.. " Sheet1 Downtown Redevelopment Project 315.94714 (as of 7/9/96) Revenue 1993 1994 1995 Expenditures , 5303 5830 Funds Available " ' Page 1 ' " $ 100,315.34 874,088.91 49,930.86 1,024,335.11 . 1 l I [ ,~ j I I ! i ; i ~ " ' 'i ~ ~ ' i, ! I i \ 52,342.95 115,730.02 168,072.97 $ 856,262.14 ' j . , I I I t I $ , I ~ ; " f i ~ J i' ~ i i j 1 i . \' I I I i'~7i,?::~;: :':';;>',.': ::>:::C,"':;::,; ':'.:, :,;; :, :::,": ";,\,;' ,:,1, ", ~ ~ I ' . , ' ;'.~' . I':,,:, , ' ',.,. . ,'. 1'"<' J :." : ~ ~ . '. . I: ~ ' . ::~ I '.. . :1 .~. ~t;(~':, . ,'/ ~.. "'. . ..,.... " " ~ . ....... ;~r(:.. '.,., t.'. < 'r ." ~ L r' '. . ~, ~:-:,;;"'.': , I;)!' . .... ':i'~ ~ L ~ "::. l:tt' .., I" , ~:i:l\"'." , }': '":' .- '~'::':" . ~.', , ~~~; '.: "'!' . /." . .~':':i .... ..' "t..' ~'; ('1:,',:';1" ~:I: ;. . ," , ~ '. : ;':'; i:; . ; , ~v:: . ...~:::' . .......< ;~.~. . ".., ': :~. I . ' ~ I ' t.,:::,'f . . , .. ~ . " , . \ ~'r , , ,,' .. '(':", , '::!": . -t;", . "i~\''': ", ~;;;, " ~;;;; , ~1\~';:' ...' ' , :. I. (~ t. " -, '. - It :preliminary Agend'a ,'(Worksession) :{ , .. ,', . ,) ',' , " } '1 L, Q ,I '.. i I ! ' 1 > , ,I I I \ L , ,; '! ~~ ,. r, ,", ," , f '. - PRELIMINARY AGENDA Clearwater City Commission Worksession - Monday, August 1 2, 1996 following CRA which begins at 1 :00 P.M. but no later than 2 P.M. Clearwater City Commission Meeting ~ 6:00 P.M. - Thursday, August 15, 1996 Service Awards GS GENERAL SERVICES 1, Purchase of a 1997 twowton truck with dump body from Sun State International, Tampa, FL, for $49,913.47 (Consent) HR HUMAN RESOURCES 1. Extend contract for health insurance with Prudential Health Care System of Tampa Bay, Tampa, FL, under fully insured funding arrangement for the period 1/1197~12/31/97, at an est, $3,569,279,20 and to offer a three~tier medical option effective 1/1/97 MR MARINE 1. Marina Business Plan PR PARKS AND RECREATION i' 1. Res. #96-52 - naming city property located at 1551 Gulf Boulevard as "Pelican Bay Park" 2. Amendment to 2/27/95 lease agreement with Philadelphia Phillies, relating to Jack Russell Stadium, extending minimum term of agreement from 12/31/2003 to 12/31/2004 (Consent) EN ENGINEERING 1. Amendment to paragraph 9 of original lease agreement (10/28/85) with Howard G, Hamilton re parking requirements (Consent) CP CENTRAL PERMITTING , . (Cont. from 8/1/96) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6062-96 - to allow car rental uses as a conditional use in the Beach Commercial District & Resort Commercial 28 District (LDCA 96-13) 2. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6063w96 - Amending Sec. 40.007 to amend and revise tho interpretation of and variance from Chapter Section by deleting the reference to net density, by deleting the old and adding new requirements for calculations resulting in a fraction (LDCA 96- 15) 3. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6068-96 - Amending Secs. 35.11 & 42.34 to specify that density calculations for nursing homes shall be computed on the basis of 3 residents equals one unit, and parking for nursing homes shall be required on the basis on 1 space per 3 persons residing in the facility (LDCA 96-14) 4. Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property located at 3130 Gulf to Bay Blvd., Sec. 16-29~16, M&B 24.07 (Emro Marketing Co. 1 Speedway; Subway, SV96-12) 5. South Fort Harrison Zoning Study Report 6. Receipt/Referral ~ Ord. '#6075-96 ~ Amending Sec. 36.033(2)(a) to revise standards for membership on the Planning and Zoning Board; amending Sec. 36,035(2)(a) to revise standards for membership on the Development Code Adjustment Board (LDCA96-1 6) 8/12/96 1 ;."".1 ClK CITY CLERK 1. Commission Policies 2, Development Code Adjustment Board ~ 1 appointment CA lEGAL DEPARTMENT Second Reading Ordinances 1. Ord. #5962~96 - lDCA amending Div. 26 of Ch. 40, to provide for revised development standards in the Urban Center District (lDCA95-20) 2, Ord. #5964-96 - 20ning Amendments for Downtown Urban Core districts (296-01) 3. Ord. #6069~96 - Relating to Building and Development Regulations; amending Sec. 47.051, to adopt the 1996 edition of The National Electrical Code & 1995 edition of The Standard for the Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases First Reading Ordinances 1. Ord. #6074-96 - Amending Art, 1 of Ch. 28, to create Sec. 28.11 to prohibit a person from using skateboa'rds, roller skates, inwfine skates, coasters and other similar devices in specified locations Resolutions 1. Res. #9647 - Abatement Lien - 630 Drew St., Jones' Sub, of Nicholson's, Blk 7, Lots ~ -3 and part of vacant alley (Schoeller I Daniel) I I Res, #96-\\ - Rules - P"f erwodL r"\ov~d +0 q .il(, q,lg Agreements, Deeds and Easements " 2. 1. Water main & ingress and egress easement - Baskin's Replat, Lot 2 (Morton Plant Life Services, Inc,) 2. Sidewalk easement - SE~ Sec. 12-29-15, Pinellas Groves Sub" lot 1 (O'Malley & Mills) OTHER CITY A TIORNEY ITEMS City Manager Verbal Reports Commission Discussion Items 1. Parking on West end of Memorial Causeway 2, Consider sign variance requests going before the DCAB 3. Police Substation on the beach 4, placement of water meters 5, PST A request for additional bus stops with advertising 6, Ervin Babalola House request Other Commission Action Adjourn .' 8/12/96 2 I: ;"';ij~I~...,~~'.~;i;:;'1,i. -,,;~i(~;':'~!,j ~:f<i.>:;.........i'i ..,.hi,..!.l.Ji Iyo. ,>~, ,;,'''''" . ~~... ".. .,..' . - . ,. , ~" .' . . . i. ~j . ..: '. .: t > ' t">' TO: Mayor Rita Garvey mOM: Betty 1. Blunt. Confidential Clerk Receptionist COPIES: ' City Commissioners, Betty Deptula, Cyndie Goudeau SUBJECT: Presentation at the August 12, 1996 Work Session " DATE: August 12, 1996 The fOlloWing presentations will be made at the August 12, 1996 Work Session: ", 5 years CharlIe Sims, Publ1c Works (letter of appreciation, pin wIth city seal) i I I J I , ! j t i I ,~I . '{;:', ' . '10 years ' L' . l} ~ : ";," ,Rex Whltte.nbel"ler, General Services (letter of appreciation, waD clock) ,', , Wllllllm Dauber" FInance (letter of appreciation, desk dock) , t" . Ii ,. ,I'. './ . , " , 15 years M8rllnda Neal, Flnaoce (letter of appreclatlon, plaque) , , ..-! , , " 30yean ~ Havens, library (letter of appreclatIoD, $400.00 vacation packae:e) 'I'" , ' ", i .' " I ~." . '~'l 1:.....;,... ~;t:' " , {l . .~. . " ~ i I ~! . ~~F .. <I., - C 1J-:L d- RECEIVED AUG ,'07 1996 t~tiE~:t~ Interoffice Correspondence Sheet CITY CLERK DEPT. To: Betty Deptula, City Manager Scott Shuford, Central Pennitting Directort?S , From: I I . I Subject: Reassignment of sign variance review to the Development Code Adjustment Board CC: Pam Akin, City Attorney ;(;yndie Goudeau, City Clerk Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager Date: August 6, 1996 At last Thursday's City Commission meeting, there was discussion whether sign variance review should be reassigned to the Development Code Adjustment Board (DCAB). Per your request, I'm listing reasons in support ot: and in opposition to, this shift in responsibility. In Support: . Consideration of sign variances is a logical extension of consideration of zoning variances. <. Upon adoption of the sign code by the City Commission in 1985, the DCAB was assigned responsibility for hearing sign variance requests, and performed this work extremely well. . The DCAB members have expressed an interest in hearing sign variances. . The planning and legal staff members which currently advise the DCAB have extensive knowledge and expertise in issues pertaining to sign regulation. . The'City Commission could free some time. In Opposition: . The City Commission currently performs this responsibility extremely welt . Hearing sign variances helps keep the Commission current on issues pertaining to sign control. . . The sign amortization program is not yet complete, and some continuity may be lost if this work is reassigned prior to completion, jmbdsvl I' ~ re C br Lf MORNINGSIDE-MEADOW5 HOMEOWNERSt ASSOCIATION, INC. July 25, 1996 P.O. Box 5182 Clearwater. FL 34618.5182 Betty Deptula, City Manager City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618-4748 Subject: Water Meters Dear Ms, Deptula: Please be advised that we have been informed that the City is currently undergoing replaCement .'of water, meters .,within our area. The City has arbitrarily moved the meters onto our privat~ property without any legal rights thereto. COPIES TO: COMMISSION JUL 3 1 1996 PRt:.SS , CLERK I ATTORNEY At Morningside-Meadows weare strong supporters of our local government and do not wish to enter into any legal disputes with the City. However, the taking of property without compensation is prohibited by the United States Constitution. We would greatly appreciate a full and adequate explanation of why this is being done. It is understood that the liability may change to the' homeowner, when the meter is placed on the homeowners property. That becomes a problem for many homeowners, Likewise, if the maintenance of the meter is forced on the homeowner, that also becomes a problem for many homeowners, Although a local ordinance was explained when the inquiry was made, that does not overcome the United States Constitution. In addition to an explanation of why the meters are being placed on our private property, we would like the meters moved back to their original locations into the City's ,right of way. Your immediate attention is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, . d::~ _/~2L . ~~L, G;fffi7- President, Morningside-Meadows Homeowner's Association, Ine. cc Oearwater City Commissioners , . ',. " {ljjI' (p MtJ\.'fOR A tjDUM FROM: The City Commission / Betty Deptula, City Manager 1f>\ TO: SUBJECT: Ervin Babalola House Relocation DATE: ' August 9, 1996 At lvJonday's Work Session, the City Commission will discuss Ervin Babalola's request to relocate a donated, single-family masonry house structure. As you are aware staff reviewed his request to place the: house near his current Youth club location, It was the stafrs detennination that the 1250 Holt Avenue location had insufficient space for it to be located immediately behind his club. However, as an alternative, staff reviewed the possibility of the house being located on Russell 'Street at Harbor Drive, currently city-owned property at the Marshall Street Wastewater Treatment Plant. In addition to studying the site, staff was to develop a cost estimate to move it to that site. . . '. . ~ , Attached is a memorandum from Rich Baier identifying a preliminary cost estimate to relocate the house to the Harbor Drive site. As you can see, it is estimated to cost ' $87,700.50 to relocate this house. Additional expenses that will also occur, but have not been estimated, are paving for parking places, striping and signage, sidewalk, water treatment pond construction and additional operating expenses of the new building. While Mr. Babalola's project is worthwhile, I am recommending that the City Commission deny his request. : I' " ,. attachment , ., I'," , ,( ~,) , . " ' " '.. ... :/....'.... ',." ,~,~.;...#..~.......,.........-.,. -uul-31-9S lO:02P P602 en~ ~ )A C4....~ ~ ~ City of Clearwater r=' 'eJu.. ' IiU~rdepartmcntal Correspondence Sheet .u. ~ tl: ~ ~ /J> ~.1:...- L . · TO: f y;:'j.~. City E~gin~j 1:J::!::: ~ .r~. fROM: Glen Bahnick, Civil EllI\ineer II ~ ~ ~ COPIES: GalY Johnson. Eogineering Project Coordinator It... ~f' ~ ~ Terry Jennings, ChiefEnglnecr · ..... I 1-1 Y-a .tc SUBJECf: E. Babalola House ReIOCAU~n - Cost Estima;:-~"'" ~ ~ ~ L.- DATE: Ju[y29. 1996 ~~ ~1JI..1::C( . . . ~';(N~i- 0 As requested, 1 have prepared a preliminAry cost estimate to relocate a donat~i;g1~. 7/jD fhmily, masonry house structure from 1746 Santa Barbara Drive, Dunedin, to ilie fanner Solid Waste Complex on Russell Street in Clearwater. Please' be aware the following has been detennincd relative to the subject matter. .'.~ 1) The aubject house located at 1746 Santa Barbara Drive, Dunedin, is an approximate 4,500 square foot structure. This structure would have to be cut in half to be relocated and new foundations constructed to accommodate the structure at the new site. After several conversations with Mr. Mark Roesch of Roesch House Movers, Inc. and after his visIt to the subject site, 'it was determined that moving costs including new concrete foundations will be $16,00 per square foot which equates to 572,000.00. This figure does not include stucco, plaster or paint repairs that will be required. 2) Additional costs related to permitting arc listed as follows: a) House Moving Permit Fee = $ 90.00 b) Development Impact Fee ;;: $ 250.00 c) Sewer Impact Fee = $ 900.00 d) Water Impact Fee = $ 480.00 e) General Services Fee = $ 275.00 f) Transportation Impll~ Fcc = $11,470.50 3) Additional costs related to utility accommodation are listed'as follows: a) Install 4" gravity PVC sewer to exlstinsllft station #68 '= $250.00 b) Install 5/8" water service and connect to existing main = $525,00 c) Install S/8u water meter = 5210,00 d) Install now GTE service line (phone not included) = $ 55.00 , c) Install new FJorida Power Service line .. $195.00 1 " - ./ . ~., ...,.....' .'~"""'" ".~ ~ .~- .....~ .~ c' h c.'. " '" 'r.. , , . .,J" , , ',' '., ,1- .. .,.' /;;. -: j )(': I" ':':;'j , ' . ~:~:.. . " ',~.:',~~~ .,. ,c1 t.~:; . ~~:> " 'h ': ~. ~r '. .::" '< , :,::~(\: ", ....,.,. '.,\', '1;i:' )~:' .' . :' :-," ".. - " . " :1.: . '''i.l. '- .;. j'.l,f" . : if ,. > ~ . ' , .. ., t'~ t '1:... . ,~::.. :' :,};'.' " A":,' ~;~.: .. '. ~;!;::~. I '..i:',\ . ~.~~,~ . ': .!{~: : " . ' . !;:i ::> ," t\~:'::. ..... .' ;,~: .. 'I '. :'.,1 ~ \ \:c~ > . ~}' ,~ I '. ~ " . :. .'.' . , " , ' '..... .:~ ~ . c ,~ :1..',: .~t~ ::". ,. }:':...' .-:." r IIJ?:', " 'j~~~I:I::'_~~;'."'iI;~~~~:~CI' _ .. .....< .l,.A ,~,~~.,.,~".' . . . ,.. " _, '. C. , P.03 In summary, the associated costs to move this structuro amount to approximately 586,700.50. Again. this figure does not Include any cosmetic work to the structure'nor docs it include landscaping or fencing costs.' The cost to construct the proposed parking faclllty is also not included inasmuch as this facility will be constructed to serve the new reservoir and pump tadlity. T trust this information will be of service to you, " " " ,', .' , " ~. " " , . ~ ; , ,;1\ , . I ". . '\ 2 '" . ..,..."......" ._ wi.. ......~~....__~...........~' ...;.~... .......T<"_.......,_.,.~...~,._................u......: ,"",'J. , " 1 \ . 1 I , 1:1 1 ; j I ! 1 i i , I 1 \ j ~ , i 1 l I l ~ I ~ .1 1 , ~ CD J: ~ ",-l- "~oP. / \ * * ).0,,1'11 aU" ~ P.O. Box 815. Clearwater, FL 34617 1250 Holt Ave.. Clearwater, FL 34615. (813) 443-2061 Fax 449.2582 E. AJAMU BABALOLA, President/CEO & Founder July 31, 1996 Betty Deputy, City Manager '. P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 34618 Dear MS..~~~ I I This letter is to request the city's support in obtaining, moving and setup of a house that is being donated to our organization. In addition to donating the house the owner has also agreed to donate $]5,000.00 toward the Ujamaa Village Project. There are other non-profit organizations including the city of Dunedin interested in this house. The owner chose our organization because of the recent article in the St. Pete Times (see attached) and our plan for promoting self-sufficiency and youth empowennent in, the ,North Greenwood community. However the owner is eager to move forward with this project. If we can not give them a firm deadline our Organization, city of Clearwater and the North Greenwood community will lose this opportunity, Time is of the essence we need this project completed like yesterday. To have this opportunity for this project taken away at this time can and will only add to the frustration and feeling of helplessness and hopelessness that continues to exist in this community. You mayor may not know that assistance with project was requested over a month ago. We are ever grateful to you, your statT, the Mayor and Commissioners for your continuous support of our organization. We are detennine to turn the odds around for the North Greenwood community youth and their families so they can build a better tomorrow and a stronger community. I I I ' I' Sincerely, .L~ Enclosure: 2 , ':' ", I-j' I :': r} .J UL a 1 '1996 ('1"1" Y ""; " ,', [' , \,.' 1,l/iP;, \'~l 'Jl "KEEPING OUR YOUTH'S FEET OFF THE STREET" v r ~l . (, 'I ,~ " . I' ,! Vj , . -, . ~ . 'r'~ .~ .~,., . ...,." .1> . ...... .'~. .~ . 'L'" .~.... H ~~~. 4l. .~. ~.'~ . --;,"H'J'rf ~.'. .:: ~.. ,. )......;..,"':-~r.~ ~~I..v.:...:~:fr..:t.;~~t.~.'lft.(/,~.~ c . ,"'; " "". ",. ~,J.i';""", " , . "I. '.. .:~ ," ;,-" '-01obyJENNIFERCORBETT H. , . . . -t i1 . .. .. . , rll I Ciub"fo'under' E. AJaiTi~, Bab~i6la, who recently changed his name from Ervin Harris,' stands In the recreation area I . C?f ttie,~lub. The busln~'9S Ye~tures will be part of an existing pr~r8;m for youths. I . : 1 ':Building.. a business base . The founder of Ervin's All-American Youth Club enVisions cookie sales and a catering company to teach about business. By CURTIS KRUEGER TlmH SbtI W... F ' CLEARWATER or more than a decade, young people in Clearwater have been stopping by Ervin's All-American Youth , Club for friendship, help with their studies and a powerful dose of self-esteem. But soon, boys and girls can come to the club to leam something new: how to succeed in business. Club founder E. Ajamu Babalola, who recently changed his name from Ervin Harris, said that by June 1 he intends for the youths to start making cookies that they can sell door to door. Later, he wants the children to develop a catering business. The goal is for young people in the club to learn how to create their own business opportunities and reap their own profits, Babalola said. "Most of the money will go directly to them," he said. And, he said, it can provide a good foundation for people who want to become businessmen and businesswomen. The Clearwater club has worked to promote business skills by sponsoring a Junior Achievement club. But this represents an expansion. Babalola said he can envision building an "enterprise plaza" on the club site at 1250 Holt Ave., a place for the students to base the catering and baking businesses. The club already has beRun a culinary arts program taught by Theopolis Whitter, a retired cbef. Youths learn kitchen safety and cooking skills. Whitter has a cookie recipe that the youths can use, and also will help train them for the catering business. Other details - when the first batch of cookies will be available. what wiU make it onto the catering menu and so on - are yet to be worked out. The business ventures will be part of a larger program at t.he club, called Youth Empowerment, or YEP. In YEP, boys and girls from 8 to 18 work on computers, study reading and math, watch educational videos and enjoy other activities. The youth dub recently was honored by the W, K. Kellog Foundation, which has named it as one of 32 model Ploase see BUSINESS Paoe :? . ~. . ~ . . '.....~ .~..... .-"it "~, "'1.: >, \". "'i.. . .'< . ~ . . ~::: .~: ,-;.;:: ;'.;, :'.;' :.: . ..,::,.:,':'l~:.:"::':)'~',~...' ",:'- ,,' . , .: :' .:~'.: '.',:. ;~l.. . l ~~:., ." ,. .. .+ 1\' . , . :.1, . , I:; '. ;............. .. .......~ .:t., I.... J':" . \:' . . ,~ :", ) <! '~. ::.'.: .' (', ,~. i . (f:;' :,,' . . '," 1'::1'" , I':: ,. " , ,~". '. , .,. ~' . --.....','.. " . ,. ) I / .. " , .. .~. /" . , : .: .:... . J-~ ~ .. ':'... .'4 ~; ',' .. , !' ' . /'. I... ........~~:.i., ":: ",' ~; i. ..,.....: ,'.. .r . .' ,...':..:\:.:: ~.: ," 4 ,. ~ I. . ~I . . .'1,.. .' ~- . .:. .-; .. ... . . .'. .. . . , . . . ,. ,. 1 J .. ~ : '~ ok'" I .~:/... . . . .'"" " ',J ~', iF t. .. ... I ,I 1 "0'. . ~. ~<;~: lI"';~L~' ~.r: t;J, n )~ .1;:'>.U~J;' ~l1'~, tBusiness'~'~'fr~:~:~ t '" . " . ,. .,..... ,.- --- ...... . . .' ~ I, i " :\ ,. " !, ,i " " . ":, c" '1 i .. " . .; " " I "fo .1 , .~ ....__...... z'....~_.. -.1_..................,. ..., ........ "'_....~...h._ ..~~. .~...... . l, ,'. ,.,)'., .' The UJAMAA VILLAGE PROJECT (UVP) "Not only are we our brothers and sisters keepers, we are our brothers and sisters." July 31, 1996 .J..c, fl.\.L - -4...,~<p' $- \ * ,.. ~Oil1'H ClU" ~ P.O. Box 815. Clearwater. FL 34617 1250 Holt Ave.. Clearwater, FL34615. (813) 443-2061 Fax 449-2582 E. AJAMU BABALOLA, PresldenVCEO & Founder UJAMAA VILLAGE PROJECT (UVP) .Ujamaa is a Kiswahili word which means Cooperative Economics (To build and maintain our own stores shops and other businesses and 10 profit from them together) Ujamaa Village Project (UVP) will be a self supporting community project managed by a Board of Directors consisting of community youth under the directions of Ervin's All American Youth Club, Inc. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Ujamaa Village Project (UVP) is to bring about positive change in the North Greenwood community by affording young African-American men, women and their families to realize that they are not part of the problem, but part of the solution. By developing and running their own legitimate businesses they will understand they have the power within themselves to build a brighter future. GOALS The goal of this project is to afford the youth and familes living in the North Greenwood community of Clearwater, Florida a chance to learn job skills, develop their own businesses, strengthen their self esteem and contribute to their community. This project will also show that if young people are just given an opportunity to work, and and a feeling of ownership they will do innovative things to help their communities, PROGRAMS: UVP will provide youth and adult entrepreneurial programs that enhance self-esteem, foster education and marketable job skills, as well as to provide counseling and other programs (designed to affect the whole family) to inner city residents who are lacking proper education, job skills, and life skills necessary to obtain and maintain a lifestyle free of crime, drugs, and violence. UVP selVices and programs will be free of charge to all qualifYing inner city families. UKEEPING OUR YOUTH'S FEET OFF THE STREET" ~~]}.'?:,..!:&\~:~Jl~'..':;\:!"'~';' ..J.'~ -" .. . .... ........... ." -, ~.,......-I.... ..,............ ~ ,," '... ,..!.,.., . .. '. .. ~..,." " Ujamaa Village will house the Youth Empowerment Project (YEP) and the Dream Builders Academy (DBA). I The Youth Empowerment Project (YEP) is a youth leadership program which takes unmotivated. atwrisk youth and young adults ages 8w 25 and help develop their vocational and entrepreneul;al skills and helps get them into honcstwtowgoodness business ventures that are studentwrun and communityworiented. YEP is a member of the National African American Male Collaboration (NAAMC) which consist of more than 30 organizations from across the country. The Collaboration's mission is to improve the quality oflife for AfricanwAmerican Males, develop healthy minds and bodies and build leadership skills in youth. , ' Dream Builders Academy (DBA) is committed to helping youths ages 8w 18 strive for a good self-'image, family bonding, educational excellence, tolerance of others, and the understanding that anything is possible if you BELIEVE IN YOURSELF. BUSINESS VENTURES .... Present Business Ventures include: ; ~. Sewing Project: The North Greenwood Community Youth participating in the Youth Empowerment Project (YEP) will have on.site business ventures to concentrate on such as: Sewing project which was started this summer and received great revues. The present product line includes Afiicentric dining room place mat settings, and Mricentric T-shirt appliques. }c ':. Our Market As a member aHhe National Mrican American Male Collaboration (NAAMC) our , present and future products market will not only include the local area they will also be marketed nationwide through the other 32 member organizations of the NAAMC., ' FUTURE BUSINESS PLANS: Future business plans include a cookie company and silk screening company. Silk-screening Services Silkwscrecning services will include custom designed T-shirts, Hats, embroidering. silk' screening along with a full line of products including greeting cards, posters. etc. to choose from at highly competitive prices, I; , Ujamaa Village Projcct (UVP) 7/31/96 z - ----~---~----~---~_._~-~._---' -- _ o~. I ... . ,.. >,. 11 r' OTHER SERVICES: UVP will assist youth and their families to find employment. As wen as finding jobs for cHents, UVP will assist the unemployed to identifY their capabilities and become productive members of society. The UVP will offer individual assistance with: . vocational/career counseling and planning . resume preparation job search and interview skills , , , The UVP will provide referrals to: . jobs . training and apprenticeship programs . education' . other community programs 'uvp will help break the cycle of dependency for hundreds ofunemployed and out-of- schoo~ youth. '\': I" ' . ~.' ,; .,.. , \:' \', .. , j You can not put a dollar figure on the self-respect these young people will gain from these new roles. But we can calculate the immense cost to society if we continue to lose these young people. J. , At Ervin's All American Youth Club we are detennined to turn the odds around for the " North Greenwood community youth and their families so they can build a better tomorrow and a stronger community. ., ;i; I ~r. . -...' ;, " " \" 1':. , . . , ' I, ~i ' . , I '.;;.c:' .; . ,~ '.' Ujamaa Village Projcct (UVP) 7/31/96 3 ,', .' l :...~' . , , .~~,~~~A~~--'.: .... . . ................ .. ~~ ' ......... ....~ . . ~...l. \. , . -- . ~... . 1.,,::., tl .' - P.Q, Box 815. Clearwater, FL 34617 1250 Holt Ave.. Clearwater, FL34615. (813) 443-2061 Fax 449-2582 E. AJAMU BABALOLA, PresIdent/CEO & Founder UJAMAA VILLAGE PROJECT (UVP) "'Ujamaa is a Kiswahili word which means Coopcmlivc Economics (To build and mainlnin our own slores shops and other busiucsscs lInd to profit from them together) Ujamaa ViHage Project (UVP) wjJJ be a self supporting community project managed by a Board of Directors consisting of community youth under the directions of Ervin's All American Youth Club, Inc. MISSION STATEMENT The mission ofthe Ujamaa Village Project (UVP) is to bring about positive change in the North Greenwood community by helping young African-American men, women and their families to realize that they are not part of the problem, but part of the solution. By developing and running their own legitimate businesses they will understand they have the power within themselves to build a brighter future. GOALS The goal ofthi8 project is to afford the youth and families living in the North Greenwood community of Clearwater, Florida a chance to learn job skills, develop their own businesses, strengthen their self esteem and contribute to their community. This project will also show that if young people are just given an opportunity to work, and a feeling of ownership they will do innovative things to help their communities. PROGRAMS: UVP will provide youth and adult entrepreneurial programs that enhance self-esteem, foster education and marketable job skills, as well as to provide counseling and other programs (designed to affect the whole family) to inner city residents who are lacking proper education, job skills, and life skills necessary to obtain and maintain a lifestyle free of crime, drugs, and violence. UVP services and programs will be free of charge to all qualifying inner city families. "KEEPING OUR YOUTH'S FEET OFF THE STREET" - Ujamaa Village will house the Youth Empowerment Project (YEP) and the Dream Builders Academy (DBA), The Youth Empowerment Proiect (YEP) is a youth leadership program which takes unmotivated, at-risk youth and young adults ages 8- 25 and help develop their vocational and entrepreneurial skills and helps get them into honest-to-goodness business ventures that arc student-run and community-oriented. YEP is 8 member of the National African American Male Collaboration (NAAMC) which consist ormore than 30 organizations from across the country. The Collaboration's mission is to improve the quality of life for African-American Males. develop healthy minds and bodies and build leadership skills in youth. Dream Builders Academy (DBA) is committed to helping youths ages 8-18 strive for a good self- image, family bonding, educational excellence, tolerance of others, and the understanding that anything is possible if you BELIEVE IN YOURSELF, ~! BUSINESS VENTURES Present Business Ventures include: Sewing Project: The North Greenwood Community Youth participating in the Youth Empowerment Project (YEP) will have on-site business ventures to concentrate on such as: Sewing project which was started this summer and received great rewes. The present product line includes Afri-centric dining room place mat settings, and Afti-centric T-shirt appliques, Our Market As a member of the National African American Male Collaboration (NAAMC) our present and future products market will not only include the local area they will also be marketed nationwide through the other 32 member organizations of the NAAMC. FUTURE BUSINESS PLANS: Future business plans include a cookie company; Catering business and silk screening company. enterlne Ruslnen A Catering business to be ran by area youth and young adults is already in the developmental stage. UjamDa Villogo projlXl (UVP) , 818/96 2 .1) 1....,,~J.-M. "l"l. """""'....- ..~~ . c.' . . . ~ ... ~ .., ~ I ,'. ". \.... ~ . . . ",."' . , ..t .. Presently there are 15 youth being trained by a certified chef, ChefTheophlis Whitter has over 20 years experience in culinary arts. Mr. \V11itter has served as a volunteer for the past six month and has developed a curriculum which teaches these young people all phases of culinary arts, Customers will be able to choose from our brochures or design their own menu. We will provide quality food for any budget - Elegant or Casual Parties for all occasions and themes, weddings, banquets, sit~downs or buffets. Whether planning an outdoor party for 30, a formal wedding reception for 500 or company picnic for 1000. our staffwill be capable of meeting and exceeding their customers expectations for a well. planned event. In addition to delicious food items, Ujamaa Catering will offer, tables, chairs, china, flatware), bartenders, beverage attendants, service personnel, picnic and paper supplies, and customized menus. , Sillf.-screenine Services Silk-screening services will include custom designed T ~sWrts, Hats, embroidering, silk screening along with a full line of products including greeting cards, posters, etc. to choose from at Wghly competitive prices. OTHER SERVICES: UVP will assist youth and their families to find employment. As well as finding jobs for clients, UVP will assist the unemployed to identify their capabilities and become productive, members of society. The UVP will offer individual assistance with: . vocationaVcareer counseling and planning . resume preparation job search and interview skills The UVP will provide referrals to: . jobs .' training and apprenticeship programs . education . other community programs UVP will help break the cycle of dependency for hundreds of unemployed and out-of- , school youth. You can not put a dollar figure on the self-respect these young people will gain from tllese Dew roles. But we can calculate the immense cost to society if we continue to lose these young people. Ujamaa Village Projcct (UVP) 8/8/96 3 , ! ~. .~'~."~k.."..t..o~..............r.~.r .~. . .' '-__1_..~,_..~...., ."'~. ~~~'..... ....,..... ~.~>.~. .,.....,.....j '.' ~) , At Ervin's All American Youth Club we are determined to turn the odds around for the North Greenwood community youth and their families so they can build a better tomorrow and a stronger community. >." ,\ We may not do all that we wish but in the words of Mahatma Gandhi, "It is better to light a candle titan to curse the darkness. II ':'. ", Ujamaa Village Project .. ' , ' .., " '..". ;. :.' , . .... "." /.. '.. .' . , . . . . . <:. :" ,: '. ',I. < ' :, :." :"'.' .:.' I ../'. I. :o" . . i'j, ! ..1 ,i; '': ' For more information contact: E. Ajamu Babalola Ervin's Community Enrichment Center 1250 Holt Avenue Clearwater, Florida 34615 Ph: (813)'443-2061 Fax: (813) 449-2582 ';1 :, L.' I:" Ujamna Village Project (UVP) 8/9/96 ' 4 ~ ~ l . . ~ fHhhat i 1Al !'st~l~'5~~ .I~ ~~~~~%~~ 'Hf~IHHI c~ ~~1Ali~~~. ~]iS~~s~~c Ii ~~~~~~~~ fiiiil!!i! ~ )/~\{~'\~"~11~.1).~(1~)) , I . I:l j 11.g a ~ ' ~ 1 '! ' ~ t ] u ~J5 ~ 1i,...,@uE n r 11~1~~~ji1!~~!~]~ ~~I~tJ~cs~~~.lilif oS ''i! :ll" c "B"I:: g OJ II E 5 0 '" .!a o~ ..g-!'i.Eil"S';:IS7."C-g- ~:j1' !i~ t!-.s!.~'~~'Q B~~e~ , "~ fb' c"B""" .. c.s-e. ~ . i] ~I~ ~ J;' g ~ 1 ~ "g ~ on 1 Bg~l "'1i-<'CcZc~_l! '" e ii I:; oS =8" 11 ..8 '5 :a ,eo ~ ~ go - _ & OJ ~ c ~ l!:l ." ;:; :!l 1j fl::! ' .2 .,g 1 '~ ~ ~ .3 ~ ~ :9, '8 ~.g ] '0: WI 1I~\l*II*II-)I\lI'~Il'~(l~d~' , . . '. .~ . 0 :........ 'Il.~@:l ~ Ig;.~~ie .. . lU ~ I \;l, ~ I' .. . .. 4. ... I ~....,. f ~'.. I _. -- -.., ----, ~ ! ~ ~ ~ A e~ ~ R ~ ~~~lijtliJllil~il ~IJI:I~ t. j . mIfHIUhfiH! Ii iH ~! o~ J J ~ l! fJ ~ ! ! ~ s lr ' .~ . Jll i ~ ~ I ! 1 i). 1J ht)'dHlhili~ illi!i. i~ U$ " i! a!~ _ J.1 ~':d>~l ~~ gj~ lS~ Jl If!... ., ,,' l! ~ Jl !.I' l.1; < - lI: f. 1-. '" '~'Illw. )11' ,,~ t 1l'.Jl.<(..... J! lJ.... sf li!'~.l~l; ~~ .s! a~ . E J.!'I~I ~ :@ - , ~ t 111 h~' -I !lJ ~I il[ '11 Il'~' At j111!1 ~IHJ ~~, Ui UU'I W fi f H _' ] 1 1- i r. i J i j l I [ il a I f ~ ~ i Ii j r ~ f ~'-::-;-:::~-::--. j-a[ .. " < fa:31 ~~' ,[ ljr~ if f i ' III ~1 lit, ,If "ill III III if l. ijii Iff bH !d'l Hi itl;1 lilt it! iJi~ I~ll ~f.t iti Ii 11'1 !~! i) t ~'ll ~Ijl .~~ II !lfjUi{ JUt ilh ,Ifff in 11 iJjJ )!j~ JjJf )111 ll~t .fi1,11 , . . . ! 1t to; f~] 1~~ it 'f . , , ft.. 'IJ1 ~i ~ii fl'!ljfH P ~ " . du pJ it Hi j.h )fl1 hi ,'.'~~.}: , ' HH Ih !t1 '~1i lif!. jjil I~! It-d JJ' ~ ; HI} 1,1 i lIlt w Wi ~if fiJUj 'H ,~ , }.,1 !~I )1:1 Ii! nn- Ij~l.l!1 'jdjJ ~~ ~' dn iH in 'iUt Jill hid UtI diU! Iff ~ - ~ f ., ~. ...:- . - . . . . . 'J 1!l!iH l~l. Uti fit ~! ~t 11 Ij, I' (~lF ,11111'11 ,Ii, illl ';11 III1 ~i 111!1'.llllj ..:'....>.............~r......~. <J... n 1.;Lt..... <~.... ,'. ... ~~.. '"... . ,.~. '.