05/02/1996
"" ,,' ", "';'>..'"
Agenda: 5-2-96
!
t
f
~
,
I
f
i
i
r
I
I
!
I
I
I
,
"
I
i
\
I
f
~
!
~
I
,1
~
J
11
~
t
.s
.~.
I
il
.
5
;
i
I
R-5~
F~ oS
,
,
,
~
';
ti
r
;,}.
:~~:'
;l,
ft
. ,'.'
:.
',.;'
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
5 ~ CflP
.., - ----- - - - - ~ .-- - - --
. . J.
\
I
I
i
l
!
i
I
,
I
I
,
j
t
I
!
,
,
;
Note: L/.J1.9f Preliminary (Worksession) agenda and papenJork that was
in package initially but then not continued onto Thursday's agenda
is at the back of this agenda pack.
F 07
ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING
Thursday, May 2, 1996 - 6:00 P.M. - Chambers
1. Invocation
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Service Awards
4. Introductions and Awards
5. Presentations:
a) Community Relations Board - Annual
Report
b) Youth Builders
6. Appro\lal of Minutes - Regular Meeting
4/18/96
7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda
1. Rev. Dennis MacAleer Trinity Presbyterian
Church.
2. Mayor.
3. None.
4. Proclamatior.s:
Drinking Water Week - 5/5-11/96
Municipal Clerk's Week - 5/5-11 /96
Tourism Week - 5/5-11/96
5. a) Report received.
b) Report given. Participants introduced.
6. Approved as submitted.
Howard Groth, representative Clearwater Housing Authority, requested something be done regarding
the retention pond next to the Levison Center.
Ed Lewis requested some time to fix up his property.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
B. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6022-
96 - Vacating North/South alley lying
between the N % of Lot 14 & the N }'2 of Lot
1, E.A. Marshall's Sub., subject to alley being
retained full width as a drainage & utility
easement IMulti-Media Video Corp., V96-05)
9. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #'6018-
96 & #6019-96 - Annexation & RS-8 Zoning
for property located at 1612 N. Betty Lane,
Stevenson's Heights Sub., Blk 8, Lot 14
(Herbert, A96-1 3)
10. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #'6020-
96 & #6021.96 - Annexation & RS-8 Zoning
for property located at 2077 Douglas Ave.,
Cleardun Sub., Blk A, part of Lots 5-8
(Clement, A96-14)
11. (Cont. from 3/21 & 4/18/96) Public Hearing
& First Reading Ords. 115989-96 & 115990-96
- Land Use Plan Amendment to Commercial
General & CG Zoning for property located at
401 S. Belcher Rd., Sec. 18-29-16, M &8
23.11 IGerry Staring / Natalie Moyles,
Trustee, LUP96-01, Z96-02)
5/2/96
B. Approved. Ord. #6022-96 passed 1 st
reading.
9. Approved. Ords. /f6018-96 & #6019-96
passed 1 st reading.
10. Appro\led. Ords. /f6020-96 & #6021-96
passed 1 st reading.
11. Continued to 6/6/96.
1
13. Ord. #6014-96 adopted.
Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances
12. Ord. #5992-96 - LDCA revising density
conversions for nursing homes & residential
shelters, and revising parking regulations for
nursing homes, residential shelters & group
care facilities (LDCA96-05)
13. Ord. #6014-96 - Annexation for property
located at 3014 Carolina Ave., Bayview City
Sub., Slk 5, Lot 9 (John J. & Dorothy A.
Kach, TRE, A96-1 2)
14. Ord. #6015-96 - RS-8 Zoning for property
located at 3014 Carolina Ave., Bayview City
Sub., Blk 5, Lot 9 (John J. & Dorothy A.
Kach, TRE, A96-1 2)
12. Ord. #5992-96 adopted.
14. Ord. #601 5-96 adopted.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
CONSENT AGENDA (Items #15-20) - Approved as submitted.
The following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single
motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent
Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually.
15. Authorize work order to Post, Buckley I Shuh & Jernigan (PBS&J) for shop drawing review for
architectural services components associated with Pier 60 Park; approve transfer of $16,820 to
the project code from the unappropriated retained earnings of the General Fund (EN)
16. Purchase of Permit*Plan CS, Permit*Plan Cashier software, 1st year maintenance & related
services from Tidemark Computer Systems, Seattle, WA, at an est. $105,000; approve est.
expenditure of $42,000 for Digital Equipment Corporation AXP computer with financing of this to
be provided under City's master lease-purchase agreement (CP)
17. Receipt/Referral - LDCA defining "public safety facility", identifying zones where public safety
facilities may be allowed & providing standards for approval (LDCA96-11) (CP)
18. Receipt/Referral - allowing bed and breakfast inns as a conditional use within the Multiple Family
Residential 10 District, Neighborhood Commercial District, Beach Commercial District & Resort
Commercial 24 & 28 Districts (LDCA96-09) (CP)
19. Sidewalk easement - portion of Sec. 13-29-15 located according to plat of A & W Glads, Inc.,
1200 Hermitage Avenue (Falone) (CA)
20. Sanitary Sewer Lien Agreement - 1836 Diane Dr., Carlton Terrace First Addition, Blk I, Lot 16
(Izzo) (CA)
OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT
21. Memorial Causeway Discussion & Update
(EN)
21. Approved upgrade to NEPA PD&E Study.
5/2/96
2
a) Res. #96-38 - determining necessity to
replace existing Memorial Causeway
Bridge and establishing its replacement as
a high priority project and authorizing
appropriate city officials to proceed with
getting the project qualified to receive
state funding from moneys allocated in
Senate Bill 4-38 and House Bill 539
b) Res. #96-39 - requesting United States
Senators Robert Graham and Connie Mack
and United States Representatives Michael
Bilirakis and C. W. /lBW" Young to assist
the City in obtaining federal assistance to
replace the existing S.R.60 Memorial
Causeway Bridge which crosses the
intracoastal waterway with a high level
four lane divided bridge
22. Approve Downtown Clearwater Design
Guidelines; Res. #96-35 - making findings &
adopting design guidelines for the Urban
Center Zoning District; provide direction with
regard to other design review issues (CP)
23. Res. #96-33 - dedicating westerly 40' of a
portion of city owned property in Sec. 33-28-
16 as Landmark Drive Right-of-Way (EN)
24. Airport Authority - 1 appointment (elK)
25. Beautification Committee - 2 appointments
(CLK)
26. Design Review Board - 1 appointment (elK)
27. Historic Preservation Board - 2 appointments
(ClK)
28. Reappoint Dick Evans to St.
Petersburg/Clearwater Economic
Development Council (eLK)
29. Other Pending Matters
a) Res. #96-38 adopted.
b) Res. #96-39 adopted.
22. Approved. Res. #96-35 adopted. Directed
to include Harbor Oaks to areas to be
covered by design guidelines and to assign
sign bonus provisions to the Design Review
Boa rd.
23. Approved. Res. #96-33 adopted.
,
i
i
\
\
l
i
f.
1
,
24. Appointed Francis Werner.
25. Continued.
26. Appointed Howard Hamilton.
27. Appointed Clorinda Gilreath & Ric Ortega.
28. Approved.
29. None.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
30. First Reading Ordinances
a) Ord. #6016-96 - Vacating following alleys
in Pinecrest Subdivision: all of
North/South alleys in Blks 1, 6 & 9; all of
East/West alleys in Blks 1, 2, 5, 6 & 11 ;
that portion of North/South alley lying
West of Lots 1 -3 and East of Lot 8 and
that portion of the North/South alley lying
5/2/96
30. First Reading Ordinances
a) Ord. #6016-96 passed 1 st reading.
3
i'
"
~:
"
West of Lot 14 and East of Lots 1 5-17, all
being in Blk 2; that portion of NorthlSouth
alley lying West of Lots 3 & 4 and East of
Lot 5 in Blk 11; and the following alleys in
Plaza Park Addition Subdivision:
East/West alley and that portion of the
North/South alley lying East of Lots 3-6
and West of the South 45' of Lot 7 and
West of Lot 11, all being in Blk D, subject
to all of the vacated alleys being retained
full width as drainage and utility
easements (City, V96-03A)
31. Other City Attorney Items 31. None.
32. City Manager Verbal Reports
a) Legislative Update - City 'Clerk reported Pension bill has passed in the House, uncertain of its
status in the Senate. Mangrove bill passed, uncertain of final language. Mayor Garvey
expressed concern re legislature not listening to the Cities re the pension bill.
City Manager reported the Downtown Development Board will not be able to meet with the
Community Redevelopment Agency 5/1 3/96. Calendars to be brought to Special Worksession
5/6/96 in order to schedule another date.
City Manager announced educational meeting re landmark Drive extension set for 7:00 p.m. on
5/9/96. Commission invited. Neighborhoods being posted.
l
1
~~
>-
.ii
33. Other Commission Action
."
;J
~.
Hooper said thoughts and prayers are with Commissioner Johnson on the loss of his brother-in-
law; with Commissioner Seel as she attempts to get home from Arizona. He stated in light of
Proclamation for Municipal Clerk's Week; thanks to the City Clerk and City Attorney for IIkeeping
us out of trouble".
Clark reported he received phone calls re C-View schedule not being in the paper. Suggested
when paper unable to accommodate, a copy of the schedule be in the information booth.
Garvey announced Downtown Marketplace. Commissioner Hooper reminded the public of the
Fun-N-Sun parade. Mayor Garvey announced the parade would be at 7:30 p.m., Saturday
5/4/96.
1
J
i
34. Adjournment - 7:52 p.m.
5/2/96
4
. ~ . t ", . .... ,.. ~ . ,-
.. 'I.' .
AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING
Thursday, May 2, 1996 - 6:00 P.M. - Chambers
Welcome. We are glad to have you join us. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then
state your name and address. Persons speaking before the City Commission on other than Public
Hearing items shall be limited to 3 minutes. No person shall speak more than once on the same
subject unless granted permission by the City Commission. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY
REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING,
SHOULD CALL 813/462-6684.
1 . Invocation
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Service Awards
4. Introductions and Awards
5. Presentations:
a) Community Relations Board - Annual
Report
b) Youth Builders
6. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting
4/18/96
7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda
PUBLIC HEARINGS
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn-in.
Not Before 6:00 P.M.
Administrative public hearings:
Presentation of issues by City staff.
Statement of case by applicant or representative (5 minutes).
Commission questions.
Comments in support and in opposition (3 minutes per speaker).
Commission questions.
Final rebuttal by applicant or representative (5 minutes).
Commission disposition
8. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6022-96 - Vacating North/South alley lying between the N
Y.2 of Lot 14 & the N Y2 of Lot 1, E.A. Marshall's Sub., subject to alley being retained full width
as a drainage & utility easement (Multi-Media Video Corp., V96-05)
9. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6018-96 & #6019-96 - Annexation & RS-8 Zoning for
property located at 1612 N~ Betty Lane, Stevenson's Heights Sub., Blk B, Lot 14 (Herbert, A96-
13)
10. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6020-96 & #6021-96 - Annexation & RS-8 Zoning for
property located at 2077 Douglas Ave., Cleardun Sub., Blk A, part of Lots 5-8 (Clement, A96-14)
5/2/96
1
..,: j' ,': :;"".',', ""~ ;',:'",.'"'.' ..,,',', "/'.' '.',,>:.": .";-,," ',' ,. ""<", 'J"""""'" ',',:':"',".,:, ",:;.',',,<'::, '....:,:J....-.,.,:.:'.:,..
, '. ," . I ',' ~~:"., 1" . , , 1', . ., . .' . '
Variance & Rezoning public hearings:
Staff states and summarizes reasons for recommendation (2 minutes).
Applicant presents case. Witness may be cross-examined (15 minutes).
Staff presents further evidence. May be cross-examined (10 minutesl.
Public comment (3 minutes per speaker).
City Commission discussion, and may question any witness.
Applicant may call witnesses in rebuttal (5 minutes).
Conclusion by applicant (3 minutes).
Decision.
11. (Cont. from 3/21 & 4/18/96) Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5989-96 & #5990-96 - Land
Use Plan Amendment to Commercial General & CG Zoning for property located at 401 S. Belcher
Rd., Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 23.11 (Gerry Staring I Natalie Moyles, Trustee, LUP96-01, Z96-02)
Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances
12. Ord. #5992-96 - LDCA revising density conversions for nursing homes & residential shelters, and
revising parking regulations for nursing homes, residential shelters & group care facilities
(LDCA96-05)
13. Ord. #6014-96 - Annexation for property located at 3014 Carolina Ave., Bayview City Sub., Blk
5, Lot 9 (John J. & Dorothy A. Kach, TRE, A96-121
14. Ord. #6015-96 - RS-8 Zoning for property located at 3014 Carolina Ave., Bayview City Sub., Blk
5, Lot 9 (John J. & Dorothy A. Kach, TRE, A96-121
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
CONSENT AGENDA (Items #15-20)
The following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single
motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent
Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually.
15. Authorize work order to Post, Buckley, Shuh & Jernigan IPBS&J) for shop drawing review for
architectural services components associated with Pier 60 Park; approve transfer of $16,820 to
the project code from the unappropriated retained earnings of the General Fund (EN)
16. Purchase of Permit*Plan CS, Permit* Plan Cashier software, 1 st year maintenance & related
services from Tidemark Computer Systems, Seattle, WA, at an est. $105,000; approve est.
expenditure of $42,000 for Digital Equir>ment Corporation AXP computer with financing of this to
be provided under City's master lease-purchase agreement (CP)
17. Receipt/Referral - LDCA defining "public safety facility", identifying zones where public safety
facilities may be allowed & providing standards for approval ILDCA96-11) (CP)
18. Receipt/Referral - allowing bed and breakfast inns as a conditional use within the Multiple Family
Residential 10 District, Neighborhood Commercial District, Beach Commercial District & Resort
Commercial 24 & 28 Districts (LDCA96-09) (CP)
5/2/96
2
\:: ", - : ::: /::~:,: 'Y':':~:.:'-:"~:'-, '.::: ,~':..', '::".' ,; ;~::; ,.'., ~',:':~.:. ;':.',.",:': ':;> :,._,< .,', ", :."', . '.':";"~::~_;;." :;,:':~,... :,>',""-:":'.:':,: '::';,:,<: ;'.'< '~>,:'::. .','__.':~. :'.':;:<.J" ~-:;,' ,."',' ':. :..~ :,,~.-,: . '< ,< ':,,. ,::,:,: ">':':':~\,,Y; ,:\\::'::,:\ ,,",:'.:"',;:': . ~:' " :',::: ~~:~.~..' ;:. ./:>::
19. Sidewalk easement - portion of Sec. 13-29-15 located according to plat of A & W Glads, Inc.,
1200 Hermitage Avenue (Falone) (CA)
20. Sanitary Sewer Lien Agreement - 1836 Diane Dr., Carlton Terrace First Addition, Blk I, Lot 16
(Izzo) (CA)
OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT
21. Memorial Causeway Discussion & Update (EN)
a) Res. #96-38 - determining necessity to replace existing Memorial Causeway West Bridge and
establishing its replacement as a high priority project and authorizing appropriate city officials to
proceed with getting the project qualified to receive state funding from moneys allocated in
Senate Bill 438 and House Bill 539
b) Res. #96-39 - requesting federal funds for replacement of Memorial Causeway Bridge
22. Approve Downtown Clearwater Design Guidelines; Res. #96-35 - making findings & adopting
,design guidelines for the Urban Center Zoning District; provide direction with regard to other
design review issues (er)
23. Res. #96-33 - dedicating westerly 40' of a portion of city owned property in Sec. 33-28-16 as
Landmark Drive Right-of-Way (EN)
24. Airport Authority - 1 appointment (ClK)
25. Beautification Committee - 2 appointments (ClK)
26. Design Review Board - 1 appointment (ClK)
27. Historic Preservation Board - 2 appointments (ClK)
28. Reappoint Dick Evans to St. Petersburg/Clearwater Economic Development Council (CLK)
29. Other Pending Matters
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
30. First Reading Ordinances
a) Ord. #6016-96 - Vacating following alleys in Pinecrest Subdivision: all of North/South alleys
in Blks 1, 6 & 9; all of East/West alleys in Blks 1, 2, 5, 6 & 11; that portion of North/South alley
lying West of Lots 1-3 and East of Lot 8 and that portion of the North/South alley lying West of
Lot 14 and East of Lots 1 5-17, all being in Blk 2; that portion of North/South alley lying West of
Lots 3 & 4 and East of Lot 5 in Blk 11; and the following alleys in Plaza Park Addition
Subdivision: East/West alley and that portion of the North/South alley lying East of Lots 3-6 and
West of the South 45' of Lot 7 and West of Lot 11, all being in Blk D, subject to all of the
vacated alleys being retained full width as drainage and utility easements (City, V96-03A)
31. Other City Attorney Items
32. City Manager Verbal Reports
a) legislative Update
33. Other Commission Action
34. Adjournment
5/2/96
3
" :.:: : ,:,: , ", ,,' ": '. .. ,:' ,';~".' .:~ ':,..>"''-: ,,', -;'~:"'. '.:'\~~~ .<<,;";':':,,, .;:,' ,,' .:: .~.. ,,',,:/., :; "., ",:,- ',.:. ::, ..~';:: ',\,:,:;~:':~, ';',: ::':r,.~.:'..:-::' ',.- ~~,:...:, "':,:' ".>~';' ',.:""': ".' '. ,: " ...-.,":, ' -'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cler@
SUBJECT: Follow up from April 29, 1996 Work Session
COPIES: Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager
DATE: April 30, 1996
In response to questions raised at the April 29, 1996, Work Session the following answers
are provided in final agenda order.
Item # 15 - Shop Drawings for Pier 60 park: The multiplier to be used for the work by
Post, Buckley, Shuh and Jernigan is 2.96.
Item #21 - Memorial Causeway Bridge: The cost of the SEIR Study is $743,668 plus a
$115,521 (20 %) contingency. The level of contingency is standard for this type of study. Thus
far; none of the contingency has been spent. To upgrade to a full NEPA PD&E study will cost
$39,400. Subtracting this amount from the existing contingency leaves a contingency of
approximately $76,000. The Resolution regarding State Funding is in the agenda pack. County
and State Funding will be added to the investigation of funding listing.
Item #25 - Beautification Committee: Information regarding whether the Committee
believes 7 members are sufficient will be provided after the Committee meets on Wednesday
morning.
Item #28 - Economic Development Council: Mr. Evans has served one two year term on
this council (5/94 to 5/96).
Miscellaneous(not on this or an upcoming agenda):
DOT Signs - Rich Baier will request the sign at 510 Cleveland Street be moved out of the
trees. He will ask Clearwater be added to the northbound sign coming out of S1. Petersburg.
.,
,.I
'.
~
\;
1
'j
1-'
4/29 Work Session Follow up
Page 2
City Street Signs - Clearwater does indicate block numbers on its street signs. Rich Baier
will work with the State and County regarding placing advance notification signs prior to major
intersections.
Traffic Engineering is investigating Mr. Meaney's concern regarding N. Jefferson between
Cleveland and Grove Streets. Response by 5/2/96.
No one attended the last meeting regarding Red Tide. However, Tom Miller, Assistant
Director Engineering/Environmental has been in contact with Mayor Patterson and has been
appointed to the committee. Mr. Miller is involved and will remain up to date on this issue
Clearwater Golf Park, Inc. leases the golf park, therefore Mr. Frank's death will have no
impact on the lease. If an assignment of the lease is requested that will come to the Commission.
We will not know until Thursday morning whether the DDB will be able to meet with the
CRA at the May 13 eRA meeting.
<" 'i
..
..
j
C I T Y OF C LEA R W ATE R
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO:
Mayor Garvey
FROM:
Sally Thomas, Agenda Clerk
SUBJECT:
Invocation
COPIES:
Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk
DATE:
May 2, 1996
Tonight's invocation will be offered by Reverend Dennis MacAleer
Trinity Presbyterian Church, 2001 Rainbow Drive, 34625
....:r~t... ~ .. ~.., "
TO: Mayor Rita Garvey
FROM:
Betty J. Blunt, Confidential Clerk Receptionist
i
i
,
i
I
1
I
COPIES:
City Commissioners, Betty Deptula, Cyndie Goudeau
SUBJECT: Presentation at the May 2, 1996 City Commission meeting
i."
DATE:
May 2, 1996-
The following presentation will be made at the May 2, 1996 City Commission meeting.
PROCLAMA TIONS
Tom Hackett - Drinkine Water Week
Cyndie Goudeau - Municipal Clerks Week
Jean Sherry - J"ourism Week
R~ 7-51.
Clearwater Center, 611 Druid Road, Suite 408, Clearwater, Florida 34616
Phone: (813) 298-1718 Suncom: (813) 558-1718 Fax: (813) 298-1717
Aprill?, 1996
COPIES TO:
COMMISSION
APR 1 7 1996
The Honorable Rita Garvey
City Hall
Clearwater, Florida
PRESS
CLERK I ATTORNEY
Dear Honorable Garvey and City Commissioners:
The Youth Builders Board of Directors would like to present the Youth Builders
participants to you and the City Commissioners at the May 2, 1996 City
Commissioners meeting.
The Pinellas Private Industry Council, the agency that administers the Youth
Builders Progr~ feels that it is important that our city officials have an
opportunity to meet and hear of some of the positive results that our young people
have gained as a result of this year-round Youth Builders Program.
Please place us on your agenda. Please let me know at 298-1722 of the scheduled
time.
Yours truly,
2~g~~
Program Coordinator
DR:bk
NWinllcr of tile.' r/fSl Presidential Award for O()ISlandin~ Private Industry Cuuncil"
David T. Welch, E. O.
Chait
Welch Accounting Services
Barbara Koyulis
Vice Ch.lir
Barbara Koyutis Imuran((~
OFfiCERS:
Or. Willie B Felton, Jr.
Sccrclary
51. Pell'r~b\l'g Junior College
Ronald M. Ricardo
Tn'ilsurcr
llOWis. Birch and Ricardo
leslle D. Reagin, III
Imml'dialt.' Pa"l Chall
l.D.R. Group, Inr.
~ I c9-. 0..../ -z,,/9 (,
5b
YOUTH
BUILDERS
OF
CLEARWATER, INC.
CLASS OF 1995-1996
Pinellas Private Industry Council, Inc./Workforce
Cleanvater Senrice Center
611 Druid Road, Suite 408
Cleanvater, Florida 34616
(813) 298-1718
YOUTH BUILDERS OF CLEARWATER. INC.
WHAT IS YOU'TH BUILDERS OF CLEARWAtER. INC.?
Youth Builders of Clearwater, Inc. (YBe) is a non-profit corporation dedicated to training and
developing youth to become responsible, productive citizens. The YBC program is a year-round
program that provides assessment, comprehensive training work experience and counseling for its
participants. YBC is managed by the Youth Builders of Clearwater Board of Directors. The
program is administered by the Pinellas Private Industry Council (Workforce). YBC works in
partnership with the City of Clearwater Economic Development Department, Juvenile Welfare
Board (JWB), Pinellas County School System, the Clearwater Business Community and otner
community organizations.
WHO CAN PARTICIPATE?
The YBC program targets economically disadvantaged youth who are 16 to 21 years of age, and
who reside in the targeted areas of Clearwater, as identified by the City of Clearwater. Priority is
placed on students who are at risk of dropping out of school or who have dropped out of school.
The program is also designed for those who are currently in school, but have a grade point
average of 1.5 or better, or whose academic skills will permit them to benefit from the program's
classroom instruction without special assistance.
TRAINING AND ASSESSl\'lENT
Students are paid while attending the training component of the program which includes
workshops in the following areas: pre-employment skills, work maturity skills, leadership
development, career explorations, development of a successful career plan, life skills, higher
educational opportu:1ities, career planning, learning lab/GED preparation. Students will
participate in the following types of assessments: basic skills (Englis~ math, spelling and reading),
career explorations, personality and interests. Also included is transportation to and from the
classroom, vocational and educational training and other supportive services as needed.
OTHER OPPORTUNITIES
YBC can assist students in getting tutoring for school assignments, financial assistance for college
or technical school, and in locating employment after training.
WORK EXPERIENCE
Each participant will be placed at a worksite to gain valuable work experience and training. The
youth will be paid for the work experience training. Work experience positions will be developed
in demand occupations and with businesses that are located in areas that are accessible to the
youth. Positions will be developed to correspond with youth's individual career interests.
COUNSELING
The Youth Builders Trainer will provide personal and career counseling to each participant. The
Trainer will assist the youth in developing a success plan. This success plan will be evaluated and
updated every 30 days while the participant is in the program.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Contact the Clearwater Workforce Service Center and ask for the Youth Builders Trainer. We
are located at 611 Druid Road, Suite 408, Clearwater, FL 34616, 813/298-1718 or F f\"X
813/298-1717.
.... __.--._____ ~_~_-..__ _. w__.__.. , ., . '. ,
. ' . . ' . .
. . . I w
YOUTH BUILDERS OF CLEARWATER~ INC.
CLASS OF 1995-1996
Cerise Bovd - Condon Meek Century 21 Insurance Company
My name is Cerise L. Boyd and I'm 17 years old. I live at 2057 Kings Highway, Apartment #11,
Cieaxwater, FL 34615. 1'm in the 11 th grade at Dunedin High and will be graduating January
1998. I am the type of person whose determined to achieve something I say I'm going to do.
I'm most of all a survivor, intelligent, respectable, easy going, just a tad bit shy.
The Youth Builders Program taught me important things such as how to fill out job applications
cor.rectIy, to follow the correct dress code for the business world, and job interviewing skills.
Basically, the program helped all of us to become better citizens, students, and to be a good
example for other youth to follow.
I am employed at Condon-Meek, Century 21 Insurance Company. My is John Meek, Jr. who
taught me a lot of things. Now I know the ropes and you can't tell me anything.
My job duties are filing, typing, faxing documents across the country, refilling soda machines and
copy machines when low, operating a mail machine. I thought I would never be able to perform
these types of duties but I now realize that I only needed to have confidence in myself
Phuon2 (Rose) Bui - Thorou2hbred Music Company
My name is Phuong (Rose) BuL I am 17 years old and in the 11 th grade at Countryside High
School. I work for Thoroughbred Music Company as a Girl Friday. My duties are to type on the
computer, do filing and copying documents.
Youth Builders has a given me an opportunity for employment which I may never not have had
othexwise. I am learning responsibility and teamwork.
My plans after high school include attending St. Petersburg Junior College to study computer
programmmg.
Kristina M. Fair - Rainbow Recovery - Morton PlantIMease Hospital
My name is Kristina M. Fair. I am 17 years old, and I am in the 9th grade at Clearwater High
School. I work at Rainbow Recovery in Morton Plant/Mease Hospital. My job title is Health
Care Technician. My duties are to take care of sick children, changing diapers, cleaning and
straightening up at the end of the day, keeping records, and keeping children entertained.
Selina Glisson - Visualedge Studios
Hello, my name is Selina Glisson. I am 19 years old and a junior at Largo High School. I work at
Visualedge Studios where I am a Photo Studio Assistant. As an Assistant, I do all the little things
that are needed to be done like answering the phones, sending faxes, working with the computers,
archiving the negatives, helping out with photo shoots, handling the equipment, and keep the
studio clean and organized.
"
'~-:': I:" -' '\-, ,:',"',' :!,~" ',:"'." '.:".' "':~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~,~~~~_~~~~.~~_~~~~----~-~_:_~~~~~_:
, -, '. ~, , . I." - " ' I. .. :' . , , . .... '.-'- .. - - ~ -'";.
Youth Builders to me is giving young people a chance to develop skills that can be used in the
professional business world. I am not yet sure what my plans for the future are, but I do know
that whatever I choose to do, I will have a better chance at succeeding because of what I learned
in the Youth Builders Program.
Annissa L. G()ins - Checker's Drive In Restaurants
My name is Annissa L. Goins. I am 16 years of age and in my junior year of high school at
Clearwater High. I'm currently empluyed at Checker's Drive In Restaurants, Inc. as an
Accounting Clerk. Some of my duties include making journal entries, deleting vendors that no
longer exist, helping a co-worker with a weekly check run and typing and mailing out important
papers. I feel that I would not have this opportunity ifit had not been for the Youth Builders
Program.
I always knew what I wanted to do, but I wasn't sure how I was going to make it, and Youth
Builders has made my dreams come true. I feel that Youth Builders is a very good program, that
in a sense helps you find yourself. You learn a lot about yourself and other people in the
program, what you want to do in life, and about the world of occupations. Youth Builders has
and continues to help me and my friends and I think that the program should continue.
Dan Halikas - Builder's Square
My name is Dan Halikas. 1'm 17 years old, a junior at Clearwater High School and an Assistant
Helper at Builde(s Square II which is three streets from my school and is near Clearwater Mall.
On my first day, I met a lot of people and they enjoyed having me there, saying that my work
there was excellent. My injury report has been low, but when you work, anything can happen. I
help at Builder's Square from 3:00-6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. It is great to work on
community service projects such as "Paint Your Heart Out Clearwater". Can't wait to see the
city officials on May 2nd!
Cuone: H()n2 - Elite Solution
My name is Cuong Hong. I am 19 years old and a senior at Countryside High School. June 6,
1996 will be my graduation day. Because of the Youth Builders Program, I am now working for
Elite Solution. My job is very simple. I report to work from three o'clock to six o'clock five
days a week. On my job, I'm learning many things such as building new computers, changing and
repairing parts of old computers, and prepping cases for other computers. After being employed
there for several weeks, I have developed a strong interest for this occupation. There are times
that I don't know certain things about repairing computers, so I just sit down and read the manual
when I get to a hard part to come up with answers. I also assist in delivering computers to other
job sites.
My plans are to study for this occupation at PTEC.North beginning in the fall session. I feel
greatful for the help that Youth Builders and Workforce have given me. Youth Builders is a good
program for training our generation. I'm happy to be in the Youth Builders Program as one of
the participants. The Y outr. Builders Program helped me to plan for my future, and assist me in
selecting an occupation that will bring success for me in the future. I have had pleasant
experiences with being involved in the Youth Builders Program at Workforce and for that I thank
you.
.::,<:~\ ;:' '.:-:',:', ',:::' ',:~,t:,<: ,':', ::\;.< :'. :';, .::,: ':.::'~:;:.:'? ':,:;< :,' ',,' ~'<'. :. .: :,,1, :>..:, :::" :,'.,\,::>>;" ' , ,',,:':,>> '::' .>,,' >::,'~':'.:':' .::::'f\:;::~,\:r\,;",}::.::~:,:':, ,":<, '.". ,~':" ,.;: '.:' .' ". '. I> ,': >,: ,)',' ":"" " ':'.:''', ":",' ,~. ::,..:
. .'. f . . ., .... . .' . "" . .' '. .. ~ ~... " . .
Phuon2 Huynh - Perenich & Carroll
Hi! My name is Phuong Huynh and I'm 18 years old. I am frorn Vietnam and have been in the
United States for four years. I'm ajunior at Countryside High School. I found out about the
Youth Builders Program from the Guidance Department in my school. A staffmernber from the
Youth Builders Program came to our school and talked to us about it. I felt interested in it and
applied, and luckily I was able to join the program. Some of my friends and I went there and
learned a lot about jobs and careers. We met friendly staff people and made new friends. Now
we are working at different job sites, depending on what occupation we were interested in. I'm
working at Perenich & Carroll as an Accounting Assistant. I really enjoy working there and plan
to work as an accountant in the future.
Jermaine Jackson - Fowler's & Associates
Hi, my name is Jermaine Jackson and I'm currently working at Fowler's & Associates, Architects.
On my job, I'm learning a lot of interesting things and how to apply myself. Tins is a great
learning experience for me and I am very grateful I received this opportunity to learn more about
the work place. From my perspective, rye learned how to present myself and how to get along
with others, but most of all I'rn having fun.
Mvcah Mitchell - Morton PlantIMease Hosvital
My name is Mycah Mitchell and I am Vice President of the Youth Builders class. I'm employed
at Morton Plant/Mease Hospital in the Medical Records Department. My job duties are to
assemble the charts of patients and put them in order to be filed or taken to the warehouse. I
really enjoy my job. Youth Builders has helped me to decide my career and now I want to
complete my education. I'm really happy I had this cx:perience because now I know how to write
resumes, and practice job courtesy. I thank everyone very much!
Jason Reardon - Tharou1!hbred Music
My name is Jason Reardon. I am 16 years old and a junior at East Lake High School. I work at
Thoroughbred Music and I'm a Professional Audio Consultant. I work with D.J. mixers,
turntables, consort speakers, mix cables, move large heavy boxes, and help people with any
questions. In my spare time, I mix records on the turn tables, and make my own tapes. The joy
about this job is you learn a lot about D.l styles, and how to make your own records.
Youth Builders is an excellent program. You learn a lot and you meet new people. They hook
you up with good jobs, jobs of your choice. It may not seem like much at the beginning, but stick
through it, you'll learn a lot and make out like a bandit at the end~ It's all worth it.
Tn Truon2 - Morton Plant/Mease Hospital
My name is Tu Truong. I am 17 years old and in the 11 th grade at Countryside High School. I
have been in the Youth Builders Program since October. I am now employed in the Pharmacy
Department at Morton PlanUMease Hospital.
Youth Builders was the best program I've attended, it provides many opportunities and benefits
to students who wish to discover more about their career choices. This program helps me
understand more about my goal and how to achieve it. The Youth Builders staff were very nice
:;i'~."': ,~:'" -:;:::'~'~>::,F, "> .<:"".) ':,' i,": " ::.,:';!;~':';"Y;f:~)'i:.~:};':::,;::";,~:.~)L\i:r~ t::',<:;:.:~~:::-_.':.::"'.-.~:;'::'~,:\~\~~~t~~(::.":,.~>~>_:.::".:.':":<"~:,' '. :'.:,~:,~:,,:.~':- . ',',' ;< :./':~: ;',) >.,: ,'>' ~.". . .: ' .,...'"':" ."" .'.,
and they did a great job. Besides teaching me about how to get a job and how to perform well on
the job, they went out and searched for the best job for me. I appreciate all of the things they did
for me very much. Because of attending Youth Builders, I now have the great job that fits me the
best. I would like to be a Pharmacist, and I got the opportunity to be employed as a Pharmacy
Technician at the hospital. My job duties are to pick up the medicine, mix IV solutions and
whatever else is needed to be done. I think Youth Builders is the best program for students who
would like to experience, and to discover more about their future careers.
Loan Vo - Thorouehbred Music
Hi everybody, my name is Loan Vo. I'm 16 years old and a junior at Countryside High School.
I'll be graduating next year. I'm employed at Thoroughbred Music in the Accounting
Department. My job duties include typing on the computer and faxing letters, and calculating the
amount of insurance money for health and dental care. My supervisor, Nan Owens is very patient
with me. If there is something that I don't understand, she takes the time to explain it.
I believe that the Youth Builders Program gives the opportunity for youth to get on track with
their goals, to build good academic skills and to give youth good work experience to help them
decide their future occupations. My future plans are to attend a University to major in
accounting.
Shekilah Wood - Staack & Klemm Law Offices
My name is Shekilah Wood. I am 17 years old and in the 10th grade at East Lake High School.
I'm now working at Staack & Klemm Law Offices as a Legal Assistant. My duties are to go to
the courthouse, type and I do massive mailouts.
Youth Builders to me means a better chance in the future of getting a job you desire. It gives you
a chance to really know how it is to work in the business of your interest.
In the future, I plan to either be a family law lawyer or an actress.
Corey M. Wooten - Parkview Retirement Home
My name is Corey M. Wooten. I'm 17 years old and a junior at East Lake High School. I work
at Parkveiw Retirement Home and I'm an Assistant Activities Director there. What I do there is
spend time with every resident conversing, playing games, and basically take them to the dining
room when it's time for them to eat. I also help clean the dining room.
As a participant in the Youth Builders Program, I have learned about taking on responsibility,
how to control my attitude with people and also in my job. But most of all they taught me how to
achieve my goals. So Youth Builders has done a lot for me.
YOUTH BUILDERS PARTICIP NTS AND THEIR EMPLOYERS
Cerise Boyd
Condon eek Century 21 Insurance Company
1211 Co t Street, Clearwater FL 34616
Phuong Bui
Thorough red Music
925 McM lIen Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 34619
Kristina Fair
Morton PI t1Mease Hospital- Rainbow Recovery
323 Jeffor s Street, Clearwater, FL 34616
Selina Glisson
Visualedg Photography
519 Cleve and Street, Suite 207, Clearwater, FL 34615
Dan Halikas
Builder's quare
Gulf-to-B y Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 34616
Cuong Hong
Elite Solution
13191 56th Court, Suite 102, Clearwater, FL 34620
Phuong Huynh
Perenick Carroll, Attorneys
1875 N. B lcher Road, Clearwater, FL 34625
J ermaine Jackson
Fowler's Associates, Architects
1421 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 34615
Mycah Mitchell
Job site not assigned at this time
Morton PILtlMease Hospital-Medical Records Dept
323 Jeffor s Street, Clearwater, FL 34616
Merline Mazard
Loan Phuong
Thorough red Music
923 McM len Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 34619
Jason Reardon
Thorough red Music
923 McM len Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 34619
Tu Truong
Morton PI tlMease Hospital - Phannacy Department
323 Jeffor s Street, Clearwater, FL 34616
Shekilah Wood
Staack & emm
121 N. Os eola, Clearwater 34615
Corey Wooten
Parkview etirement Home
2750 Dre Street, Clearwater 34619
LINKAGES IN THE COMMUNITY
The Youth Builders of Clearwater, Inc. Program has linkages with the following:
Business Sector
Pinellas County School System
Sergeant Allen Moore Safehouse
African-American Leadership Council, Inc.
Clearwater Police Department
Juvenile Welfare Board
Junior League of Clearwater/Dunedin, Inc.
City of Clearwater Economic Development Department
Clearwater Neighborhood Housing
Clearwater Housing Authority
!)
c
Co.
'.\
Item #
~N~
CLEARWATER CITY CO~~ISSION
Agenda Cover Memorandum
8
Meet i ng Date
5.~.Cf(f.
SUBJECT: Vacation Request 96-05 (Multi-Media video corporation)
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the applicant's request to vacate the North/South
alley lying between the North 1/2 of Lot 14 and the North 1/2 of Lot 1, E.A.
Marshall' s Subdivision subj ect to the alley being retained full width as a
drainage & utility easement and pass Ordinance 6022-96 on the first reading.
SUMMARY:
The applicant is requesting to vacate the North/South alley lying between the
North 1/2 of Lot 14 and the North 1/2 of Lot 1, E.A. Marshall's Subdivision.
. The applicant owns the adjacent property to the East, West and North and
would like to install a fence across the alley.
. The remaining alley to the South is being vacated to accommodate the
construction of a new Discount Auto Parts Store.
. The city has no existing utilities within the alley.
. The subject alley is not paved or being used for vehicular traffic.
o Engineering Services has reviewed this request and has no objections to the
vacation provided a drainage & utility easement is retained full width over
the vacated alley.
. All other City departments/divisions concerned with this request have
reviewed the petition and have no objections.
. Florida Power has an existing pole line wi thin this alley and has no
objection provided an easement is retained full width of the vacated alley.
. GTE and Time Warner Cable have no objections.
The city Engineer has reviewed the comments submitted by the
departments and recommends the applicant's request be approved
retaining the alley full width as a drainage & utility easement.
reviewing
subj ect to
Reviewed by:
Lega l N/A
Budget N/A
Costs:
N/A
COfIIlIi ss i on Act i on
(Current FY)
Approved
User Dept.
Funding Source:
Approved
w/conditions
Purchasing N/A
Capt. Imp_
Risk Mgmt. N/A
Denied
Advertised:
Operating
IS :6
ACM t.Jc. (\ Jy
ENG.
OTHER Nil
Cont'd to
Date: ~ & 4/25/96 Other
Paper: Tampa Tribune
Appropriation Code(s)
Attachments:
Not required
N/A
Application
Location Sketch
Ordinance
Submi tted by:
I City MOnage~~~
I
1-
Affected parties
notified X
Not required
VACOlJOlJAGN
.
Vacation Number 96-05
"Mul ti-Mec1ia ViCleo Corp. II
V A CAT ION R E 0 U EST
PRO C E S 8 I N G 8 H E E T
PLEASE REVIEW THIS VACATION IN TERMS OF YOUR PRESENT USE AND FUTURE
NEED FOR THE PROPERTY. INDICATE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW:
REFERENCE ATLAS SHEET NO 268B/E-7 SECTION~TOWNSHIP 298 RANGE lSE
1.
2.
3.
4.
ENGINEERING S~V!CES: ~ I
REVIEWED BY: ~ APPROVED BY: /: DATE:]'/~-7~
COMMENTS: The applicant is requesti the vacation of the
North/South Alley lying between the rth 1/2 of Lot 14 and the
North 1/2 of Lot 1, E.A. Marshall's Subdivision. This portion
of the Alley is not paved or being used for vehicular traffic.
The remaining Alley to the South is being vacated to accommodate
the development of a new Discount Auto Parts Store. The
applicant owns the property to the North and would like to fence
across the Alley. The City has no existing utilities within
this Alley. The Engineering Division has no objection to the
vacation provided the Alley is retained full width as a drainage
and utility easement. Florida Power has an existing pole line
within the Alley and has no objection provided an easement is
provided over their existing facilities. GTE and Time Warner
have no objections.
..
TRANSPORTATION GROU~ i-.. 1 \\ I _ _. . _
REVIEWED BY:~~~~
COMMENT S : -. ... c:- \
~'.2R-W""~ ~v.e.Q..~\ c.~~,..o
D~;< o/Jb
BY: /JdA9 /lIt..
DATE: 1-1.c.1 -~6
CENTRAL PERMITTING
REVIEWED BY:
COMMENTS:
The Central Permitting Department has no objections ~o vacation request.
SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT:
REVIEWED BY~ _....d.o<"...../ APPROVED BY: ~~
COMMENTS: fJ lY~ fJ
)j DO\)6 -f die ~ ~
DATE: 3/;s/f;k
Vacation Number 96-05
"Multi-Media Video Corp."
5.
GAS DEPARTMENT: '(4 J1 ----.
REVI EWED BY:;::c:;;,..~ APPROVED BY: ,. ~ ----)
COMMENTS :fJCj{C:r Wtflt f5lJ'f1e~it;J's ~t:::-/;t$
DATE: 3/;Jf5/tf'
6.
FIRE DEPARTMENT:
REVIEWED BY:
COMMENTS: .'8 ~
..
APPROVED B~~~
DATE:~~6
7.
POLICE DEPARTMENT: /1,)~
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: LE7~' v
COMMENTS: ./) .
I I <P &J6r~~
DATE: :>/r:I/ hA;
~;.
~ (4~ Y
DATE: (/
t/., ,~
.
8.
CITY ENGINEER:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
COMMENTS:
OI'L- ~ .
~
~~
PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
04/18/96
05/02/96
AND
04/25196
ADVERTISING DATE:
COMMISSION ACTION:----APPROVED----CONTINUED----TABLED----DENIED----
ORDINANCE NO.
DATE OF ADOPTION
RECORDED IN O. R. BOOK:
PAGE:
LETTER TO PROPERTY OWNER ADVISING COMPLETION OF VACATION
VACATION CARD FILE:
REVISED 02/95
VACPROC.DDM
. . ~ - - .
, I" .--. , . .
CITY OF CLEARWATER - ENGINEERING SERVICES
P.o. BOI 4748, CLEARWATER PL. 34618-4748 PH. 813 462-6970
PORM IfUMBU
1326-0104
V1\CA'l'IOII
:r I L ~ H G
"BOUB8'!'
:rORK
ADDRESS:
OR
ED REPRESENTATIVE:
PHONE: ~~~-44l-4147
\S-
1.
NAME :
HEREBY PETITION THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE
VACATION OF THE FOLLOWING:
D EASEMENT TYPE:
~ ALLEY
D RIGHT-OF-WAY
DOTHER
'-'2 --. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED, IE: IF IT IS A PORTION OF
AN EASEMENT, DESClUBE WHICH PORTION, IF IT IS AN ~r.I,EY, DESCRIBE FROM
WHERE TO WHERE OR WHAT LOT/S IT ABUTS, IF IT IS A RIGHT-OF-WAY
DESCRIBE HOW MUCH TO BE VACATED.
Alley between the north % of Lot I and the north % of Lot 14, E.A. Marshall's
Subdivision.
3 STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION:
1613 No. Ft. Harrison Avenue
4 PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY:
Install fence across alley.
5 ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY:
Residential
ILE ..
ACFORM. WJX
FORM REVISED
08/22/95
......... - ~ .....
PAGE 1 OR 2
:....~,
6.ATTACHKENTS: .
LAND SURVEY OF PROPERTY IS REQUIRED IF THIS VACATION INVOLVES AN
EXISTING ENCROACHMENT.
DRAWING SHOWING PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY
(SURVEY, PLOT PLAN, ETC.)
X SEE RESOLUTION 82-3 (ATTACHED) FOR FEE SCHEDULE
-
THE FOLLOWING LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION ARE REQUIRED:
(LIST OF CONTACT PERSONS POR THE UTILITIES IS ATTACHED)
..A- FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
X GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
-
~ TIME- WARNER CABLE
OTHER
7.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER (PLEASE ,PRINT)
NAME: //tJIr/lbk fl>t.'li~ C,rf PHONE: erCZr '-IILI 7-
ADDRESS: IlIau; .~ ~<< ~Y",qr .
OWNERS SIGNATURE ~ ~--A
8.
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF PINELLAS)
:e ~7tJ9 i7lt!jt~aS
who has produced
acknowledged before me this
;23 fib /19 ~
, who i~~~l:~-~~ me or
as identification
e a~/~~th.
rf:/ftJ Notary PUblic, Commission No. Cl)/&'-I/P /9
OFHCiAL i'\OTA;{ ( ~r.:-\L
1:' r ~ ~
(Name of Notary typed, printed or stamped)
NOTARY PUBLIC ST AT1:. CF FLOF.!D.\
COM~HSSI0N NO. CC:.&;{.lS
MYCmii~ISSION EXP, MAY 16.19QY
o ,...... en ~ ,..
PAGE 2 OF 2
~
.....
~
~
>-:
r....
~
Q
C-)
~
::s
~
~
~
"
II
II
~!:I
.
~
e-..
I
}, ;!
I
I
I I::?
L. _"'-_~
1)01
,iI
..,
I
'I I
i'lh J'lt'.'1
Ullilll. I!~~'
~. II II I'.:.a... r I
. .... .--.
.
~NCE NQ. 6022-96
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
VACATING THE NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY LYING BETWEEN THE
NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 14 AND THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 1, E. A.
MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO A DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY EASEMENT WHICH IS RETAINED OVER THE FULL
WIDTH THEREOF; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Multi-Media Distribution Corporation, owner of real property adjoining the alley
described herein, has requested that the City vacate the alley described in Exhibit A attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that said alley is not necessary for municipal use
and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the general public that the same be
vacated; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following:
The North/South alley lying between the North 1/2 of Lot 14 and the North 1/2 of
Lot 1, E. A. Marshall's Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 17, of the
public records of Pinellas County, Florida, of which Pinellas was formerly a part,
is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater quitclaims and releases all of
its right, title and interest thereto, except that the City of Clearwater hereby retains a drainage and
utility easement over the described property for the installation and maintenance of any and all
public utilities thereon.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of Pinellas
County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
and legal sufficiency:
J~. ::istant City Attomey
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 6022-96
L I
,
I
1
l
}{!' LESLEY'S I
j
'f
j
2 "'( SUB.
k-471
:c
0
15 V)
-- 10'
Q: 14
------- 0:: 1
~
16
-su-b-j. c t Pr
~. /--. / 12 ~~
~ 4.. w
0 --l
f-
:C" 1~~ 0:::
>-
2
MARSHALL STREET
7
-\0 5
,
. t a survey'
MQIE: This IS no
9- T29S-R15E
Sec. 5 d "
VAC96- . W7
RUS
1/10/96
6022 96
Ordinance
:1
,. .: '
-." :...
e!.."...
:"~\i
\\~.~.:
-.:.... .'J'
.....
b.0\- \(
Florida
Power
co",aAATION
April 16, 1996
Mr. Bob Perkins
City of Clearwater
P. o. Box 4748
CleMWatef, FL
Re: Petition to Vacate - Request 96...{)5
The 10' alley between the North 112 of Lot 1 and the North 1/2 of Lot 14
B.A. Marshall's Subdivision
Dear Bob:
Florida Power COlpOration bas no objection to the petition to vacate for the above mentioned
Ploperty .
If you bave need of any further assistance, please contact me at 562-5660.
Sincerely, -;
h{~iP
(ftrry COmad
Distribution Engineering
JC/lq>
CLEARWATER ENGINEERING OFFICE: 21 e6 Palmetto Street CI(tWVJatftl'. florlda (813) 6e2-5668
A Rodda Progress Company
bo\A'
~
ffiE
GTE Telephone
Operations
March 25, ~996
Me: FLCW5060
621 Tarpon Avenue East
Tarpon Springs, FL 34689
813942.5900
813942.5905
Mr. Bob Perkins
City of Clearwater
Civil Engineer II
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida
.
33416-4748
RE: PETITION TO VACATE - 10 FOOT ALLEY BETWEEN NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 1
AND THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 14, E.A. MARSHALL'S SUBDIVISION
Dear Mr. Perkins:
GTE Telephone Operations has no objections to the proposed
vacation of the alley described above.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you need further assistance,
please call Joe Vacca at 942-5903 in Tarpon Springs.
Very truly yours,
~~?~
Engineering Supervisor
GRJ : pay
A part of GTE Corporation
.. - -..... .- -~_.~,.... --- - - - - . - . , . .
, .
. .
Pi",/Ia. Coun,y Rf'gWn
11500 Nimh 51TH' North
SL fle'mburg. FWridiJ JJ 716
813.576.4123
BJJ.S79.49BI FOx
b.~. ~
..
~ ~~t:1~ .~~~~
Date:
3-26-96
Re:
Vacate alley lying between Nl/2 Lot 1 & N 1/2 Lot 14, E.A. Marshall Sub.
Dear:
Bob Perkins
Thank you for advising us of subject proposed project/vacation/adjustment.
xxx Time Warner has no conflict please see notes. (1)
Time Warner has no objections provided easements for our facilities are (2)
granted or retained as shown on the attached drawing.
Time Warner has no objections provided applicant bears the expense for (3)
relocation of any Time Warner facilities to maintain s\~rvice to customers
affected by the proposed vacation.
In order to properly evaluate this request, Time Warner will need detailed (4)
plans of facilities proposed for subject areas.
Time Warner has facilities within this area which may conflict with subject (5)
project. Please call One Call.
Time Warner requires 30 days written notice prior to construction start date (6)
date to relocate their f.acilities.
Please refer any further correspondence and pre-construction meetings to:
Denise ~1. Vita at 5 76-ld 23 Ext. 344 .
North County Field~ngineer
Notes:
Time Warner Communciations has no conflict with your vacation of Alley - Vacation
Request 96-05.
~. L2sB
cf~
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
9
Item #
Meeting Date:
5.;).q~
L1...4
SUBJECT:
Petition for Annexation and Zoning Atlas Amendment for 1612 North Betty Lane; Owner: Robin T.
Herbert (A 96-13)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION:
Approve the Petition for Annexation and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Single-Family Residential "Eight"
(RS-B) for Lot 14, Block B, Stevenson's Heights Subdivision and pass Ordinances No. 6018-96 and
6019-96 on first reading.
[J and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT
PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT
PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE
CLASSIFICA TION
Single-Familv Residential "Eight" (RS-B)
Not Applicable
REASON FOR REQUEST
~ Garbage pick up
ASSESSED VALUE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
II
$ 30,100.00
II
Revi ewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Total
Camaission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Denied
o Continued to:
N/A
N/A
N/A.
N/A
~A L-
.>!::,{
Originati~ Dept:
CENTRA ~HITTING
Costs: $ MIA
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
/~
!\)
Advert i sed:
Date: 4/6/96
Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE
o Not Requi red
Affected Parties
181 Notified
o Not Requi red
Flnding Source:
o Capi ta lImp.
o Operat ;n9
o Other
Att:~ts:
ORDINANCES NO. 6018-96 &
6019-96
LOCATION MAP
APPLl CA TI ON
SW-itted by: ~
City Manager ~~_
Appropriation Code:
o None
o
Printed on recycled paper
A 96-13
Page 2
EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE OF APPLICANT'S AND
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
IN CITY
LOCATION OR FUTURE LAND USE ZONING ACTUAL USE
COUNTY PLAN CATEGORY
Subject Co u nty Residential Low R-3 single family residential
Property
North Co u nty Residential Low R-3 single family residential
South Co u nty Residential Low R-3 single family residential
East City Residential Low RS-8 single family residential
'Nest Co unty Residential Low R-3 single family residential
~ The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this application on April 16, 1996 after
which they unanimously endorsed the proposed Annexation and Zoning Atlas Amendment to
Single-Family Residential "Eight" (RS-B) to the City Commission.
ZONING RESTRICTIONS
RS-6 ::!!:.iii'i!lli,'j!I'::l:I~',.:l!::iil:lll:B~~~':!::i!l::!i:'i,-~ll..::I:.:~I'ii!::.l:'.: EXI STI NG
DEseRI PTI 0 N REQUIRE MENTS .::~j:::r!E~g]ffl:rfJY[~Nm~:':~j::'
Dens ity 5. 5 u. p. a. il:ljll~:~l:..'~~:~:~:~:~ii;I'I!:':::I'I:':::'I:::j':.::\11:::::1\.:::1::: 6.2 u. p . a .
maxi m um :::i:mmHng.m:I::'j::::tii::::::::i:::::':::ii~::':::::::::
Lot Area
7,000 sq. ft.
minimum
."IIIII~llilfl;il~ 7,000 sq. ft. m.o.1
Illjlll~;illlllill;~i.170 ft.
~ill~II"t'lllliII111 00 ft.
Lot Width at
setback line
Depth
70 ft. minimum
85 ft. minimum
OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS
AGENCY
YES
NO
X
X
Pinellas Planning Council/Countywide Planning Authority
Florida Department of Community Affairs
ABBREVIATIONS:
RS-8 Single-Family Residential "Eight" (City)
R-3 Single-Family Residential (County)
u.p.a.residential units per acre
a9613.cc
PETITION ~OR ANNEXATION
t
city commission
city of Clearwater
P.o. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida
commissioners:
We, the undersigned, being all owners of the described real
-property, contiguous to the pre8en~ boundaries of the city of Clearwater,
and situated in an unincorporated area of Pinellas County, Florida, do
hereb! request that said property be annexed into the corporate limits of
the c ty of Clearwater, Florida.
We hereby further request that said property be zoned and classified
uhder the Zoning Ordinance of the city of Clearwater, as set forth on the
fOllowing page.
Attached hereto is 8 current survey of the described property, (if
it is unplatted), together with a certificate of title from a title
company, 8 copy of the deed or a letter from a licensed attorney setting
forth the names of all persons, firms or corporations owning any interest
in the described property. .
The undersigned have been advised of, understand and in
consideration of annexation, utility services, and other good and
valuable consideration, do hereby agree and covenant as follows:
1. all structures and improvements which are erected upon said
property subsequent to the date of this petition for annexation
shall comply wlt:h all applicable city of Clearwater regulations
and ordinances a8 Bet forth in the city Code of Ordinances;
2. to convey such recreation land, recreation facilities and open
space land dedication. and/or fees in the amount and manner
prescribed by Division 2 and 3, Chapter 116, Article IV of the
Clearwater Code of Ordinances, and
3. when any substandard 8bu~ting street or utilities are
subsequently upgraded by the city to meet City StandardS, said
improvement will be done on an assessment basis, consistent
with city procedures therefore.
We, the undersigned hereby certify that we have read and examined
all of the statements and allegations in the foregoing Petition including
attachments and after being duly sworn, deposed and say that such
statements are correct, complete and true and VOluntarily made with full
knowledge thereof.
l-Kot Co- 13 R'o .. L{Ca~<-I- () 7
W' DL
~~~Jj
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF PINELLAS )
subfJcribed and sworn to before me this J.!j!!day of '-rn (1)..cA-
199LD .
My Commission Expires:
~&ML ~ I-!i/~ au-)
Notary
~MR8ARA R. P.l0HNMANN
NotlIY Public. Slele of Rorkia
. My Cotm\. Expires Doc. 10. 1998
, No. CC 417925
~ndCd lhrv (1)111'''' If.l.... ~"Jlrt
1-(1](10) m-Ol:11
BARBARA E. ElGcNMANN
"
ORDINANCE NO. 6018-96
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF
CLAIRE DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 14, BLOCK B,
STEVENSON'S HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 1612 NORTH BETTY LANE, INTO THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE
BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the
City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
Lot 14, Block B, Stevenson's Heights, according to the map or
plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 34, Page 13, public records
of Pinellas County, FL. (A96-13)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the
dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have
heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the
City Clerk and the Central Permitting Director are directed to include and show the property
described herein upon the official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk
shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after
adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after
adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
legal, sufficiency: _
j. /.:.L/ . :
,. /', I
Leslie K. Dougall-Sid s
Assistant City Attor" y
Attest:
.( 1-
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No 6018-96.
..
ORDINANCE NO. 6019-96
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERlY LOCATED SOUTH OF CLAIRE
DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 14, BLOCK B, STEVENSON'S
HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
1612 NORTH BETIY LANE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
"EIGHT' (RS-8); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance
is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive
plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby
zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is
amended, as follows:
Property
Zoning OistriQt
Lot 14, Block B, Stevenson's Heights
Subdivision, according to the map or plat
thereof on record in Plat Book 34, Page 13,
public records of Pinel/as County, FL. (A96-13)
Single Family Residential "Eight" (RS-8)
Section 2. The Central Permitting Director is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City
in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6018-96.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency: ~
y. l/l y.',
- ,', ,1' '..~ ~ " . "
Leslie K. Dougall-Si es
City Attorney
Attest:
(,
\
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 6019-96
- ~ - ~---~-,.~~.-~--~--..~-~--_.-".-. -"..' .
0
~
- t-. -
(:) - C'\I
.., ., C')
... - ...
18 14 13 10 ~
t7tO
0:
31t>> 9
1 a .. ~ ..
~ (:) ~ II') 6
., ., II')
... ... ... -
~ FAlRMON
'S:6 \Q t-. 1530
a ~
~ ...
1 9 8 7 6
)of 10 ~
E-t <
""
0
eo
~ ,
1 c
c
~
0,
....
a
a
.,
~
...
~
Q
OS/R
D.8.1203-.$%
(t9.-&)
D.8.1229-43O
(1~)
.....
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
AND ZONING
OWNEfI:
ADDRESS:
Herbert, R T
1612 N. Betty Ln
A:aft:la
p
COUNTY:
CITY :
~
R-3
RS 8
Lot 14, Blk e, Stevenson's Heights
ATlAS PAGE: 2698
ACRES:
RIGHT-of-WAY: ACRES:
SEe: 16 TWP: 29 S RGE: 1 6 E
0.16
. .
rt-5b tI
I
I
I
I
t
91
t
.
,
...
a=
S
a
J
..
I
~
I
..
i
.
II
III
~
Q
........ .trI,,___
"
f
I 1
) Q() -f-nDl~
S I
~
i
,.
i
,_--'1
cr..\t
!
~
fOOl__
---
__I
:I
" 'S...
cno
..~
.., .-....
Q
~...
I
j
':Io\....~
'b
.
..
..
i
II
~
~
i
... JImII 1- -
, ~
JICIJII
IIoJ
c 2:
I g
-
~
... ,.."
~ o/{'
i .,'" tJ I
..
..
I
t
=
i
~'1-
--
'..
.. "I", :n~ "3'''
~l
t'
.
Q
a 0
~-W 'Y\~"'.-f
1.<'
....., AU>>
':Io\y lInKS.. -
':10\9
~
~
t?'.f.,~.<
I- '..,':'."1._, "
" , -- ~. . '
': "'. ....., ~:;~.:~~
Item # 10
I
{
t
I
t
c
f
I
I
f
I
,
I
!
t,',
(;:
:~~
I
;~ ';'
)
';~i
;.:~
U
~;<
;:!
;:~.
F tt?
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
1 tern #I
Meeting Dote:
Cf3
o
5~.q0
SUBJECT:
Petition for Annexation and Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2077 Douglas Avenue; Owner: Loretta C.
Clement (A 96-14)
RECOMMEN DA TION/MOTI ON:
Approve the Petition for Annexation and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Single-Family Residential "Eight"
(RS-B) for West 67 feet of Lots 5, 6, 7 & 8, Block A, Cleardun Subdivision and pass Ordinances No.
6020-96 and 6021-96 on first reading.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT
PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT
PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE
CLASSI FI CATION
Single-Family Residential "Eight" (RS-B)
Not Applicable
REASON FOR REQUEST
.. Sewer Service
ASSESSED VALUE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
~ :
$ 38,400.00
II
Revi wed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
R isle Mgmt.
CIS
ACH
N{A
N{A
N/A
NlA
~~(L..
Originating Dept:
CENTRAL MITTING
Costs: S MIA
Total
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
C~ission Action:
[J Approved
[] Approved w/conditions
[] Deni ed
[] Continued to:
rP)
Advertised:
Date: 4/6/96
Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE
[J Not Required
Affected Parties
liD Notified
[J Not Requi red
Fla'lding Source:
o Capi tal I~.
o Operat i n9
o Other
AttacMents:
~DINANCES NO. 6020-96 &
6021-96
LOCATION MAP
APPLICATION
~
Awropriation Code:
o None
~ Printed on recycled paper
A 96-14
Page 2
EXISTING ZONIN J AND FUTURE LAND USE OF APPLICANT'S AND
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
IN CITY
LOCATIO OR FUT RE LAND USE ZONING ACTUAL USE
N COUNTY PL N CATEGORY
Subject County ntial Urban R-3 single family residential
Property
North County ntial Urban R-3 single family residential
South County ntial Urban R-3 single family residential
East City ntial Urban RS-8 single family residential
West County ntial Urban R-3 single family residential
~ The Engineering Depart lent recommends that the City annex the abutting right-of-way of
Douglas Avenue along w th this application.
~ The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this application on April 16, 1996 after
which they unanimously endorsed the proposed Annexation and Zoning Atlas Amendment to
Single-Family Residential "Eight" (RS-B) to the City Commission.
ZONING RESTRICTIONS
DESCRIPTION
RS-6
REQUIRE ENTS
5.5 u.p.a.
maximum
:m:::::::~r:::@:::::::::t::!!::::A:SI~~::m::}:::mt::::::m::m::::::!: E X I STI N G
1II111mlltll
111\1111~!!II:llll~.I:I~II~I'I!llli!:.i'111111111111.11.."'111.1.1!:.11111:11 6.4 u. p. a.
:::::m~:V.U'~"T~m'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
~:~:~::.~::.~::.~~~:;~:~~~,:::.::~.::~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~{:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:
Density
Lot Width at
setback line
70 ft. mini urn
1I1111il111i 6,834 sq. ft. m.o.1
li\llllfl"li 67 ft.
:::ij~m!~::fl:J:f:':ffii:fi:iffiGI::::!::'.::':::\:: 1 02 ft.
~:i:~:!:~:!;~:~:~:~:::j:~:~:::!:::~:~:;:~:~:~:!:i:!;~;~:~:!:::~;~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:!:~:~:~:!:i:~:~:~:::~;~:~:~:~:~:~:
:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:::::::::;:::;:;:;:::;:;:::;:;:::;:;.;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:::::;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:i::
:::::::::::::::;::;::::;:;:::;::.:;:::::;:;::::::::::;::::::::::;::::;:::;;:;:;:::::;:;:;:;:::::::::::::::::;:;::::
Lot Area
7,000 sq. t.
minimum
Depth
85 ft. mini um
OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS
YES
NO
X
X
Pinellas Planning Council/Cou tywide Planning Authority
Florida Department of Commu ity Affairs
ABBREVIATIONS:
RS-8 Single-Family Residential 'Eight" (City)
R-3 Single-Family Residential County)
u.p.a. residential units pe acre
a9614.cc
0'155"" 5"J3#31-foOl-O-f7\LfJdOO(
. 3P-1/87
~;~~ibed etld Bworn to before DB this O{! day of fihy/.f.UU-
~ ()~ tclx,
l--'
PBTXrXOH FOR AHN~TXON
r
~~~~!~ID
city commission
city at Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
Clear~ater, Florida
commissioners:
We, the undersigned, being all owners of the described real
-property, contiguous to the presen~ boundaries of the city of Clearwa~er,
and situated in an unincorporated area of pinellas County, Florida, do
hereby request that said property be annexed into the corporate limits of
the city of Clearwater, Florida.
CENTRAL PERMllTlNG
CITY OF CLEi\RW.~ TEA
We hereby further request that said property be zoned and classified
uhder the Zoning Ordinance of the city of Clearwater, as set forth on the
fallowing page.
Attached hereto is a current su~ey of the described property, (if
it is unpl.atted), together wU:h a certificate of title from a title
company, a copy of the deed or a letter from 8 licensed attorney setting
forth the names of all persons, firms or corporations owning any interest
in the described property.
The undersigned bave been advised of, understand and in
consideration of annexation, utility services, and other good and
valuable consideration, do hereby agree and covenant as follows:
1. all structures and iDp~ovementB which are erected upon said
property subsequent to the date of this petition for annexation
shall comply 'W,ith all applicable city of Clearwater regulations
and ordinance~ as set forth in the City Code of Ordinances;
2. to convey such recreation land, recreation facilities and open
space land dedication. and/or fees in the amount and manner
prescribed by Division 2 and 3, Chapter 116, Article IV of the
Clearwater Code of Ordinances, and
3. when any substandard abutting str.eet or utilities ara
subsequently upgraded by the City to meet City standards, said
improvement vill be done on an assessment basis, consistent
with city procedures therefore.
We, the undersigned hereby certify that we have read and examined
all of the statements and allegations in the foregoing Petition including
attachments and after being duly sworn, deposed and say that such
statements are correct, complete and true and voluntarily made with full
knowledge thereof.
~ rL t1~~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
)
)
Hy Commission Expires:
A
~ Publlo. 81111 0 ~
Myeomm,"~"AP,.10.10QV
No. CCUlt2I
BaNed nvv ocn.1aI Jl*",tMlca
H 72).0t71
"
ORDINANCE NO. 6020-96
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF
PALM STREET, CONSISTING OF WEST 67 FEET OF LOTS 5, 6,
7, & 8, BLOCK A, CLEARDUN SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING
ABUTTING RIGHT-OF-WAY OF DOUGLAS AVENUE, WHOSE
POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2077 DOUGLAS AVENUE, INTO
THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING
THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID
ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the
City pursuant to Section 171.044. Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
The West 67 feet of Lots 5, 6. 7. and 8. Block "An, Cleardun Subdivision,
according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13. Page 47,
public records of Pinellas County, FL together with abutting right-of-way
of Douglas Avenue. (A96-14)
Section 2. Tt.e provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the
dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have
heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the
City Clerk and the Central Permitting Director are directed to include and show the property
described herein upon the official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk
shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pine lias County, Florida, within 7 days after
adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after
adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
Ordinance No . 6020.96
ORDINANCE NO. 6021-96
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PALM
STREET, CONSISTING OF WEST 67 FEET OF LOTS 5, 6, 7, & 8,
BLOCK A, CLEARDUN SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING ABUlTlNG
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF DOUGLAS AVENUE, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2077 DOUGLAS AVENUE, UPON
ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL "EIGHT" (RS-8); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance
is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive
plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby
zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is
amended, as follows:
Property
The West 67 feet of Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8,
Block "An, Cleardun Subdivision, according
to the map or plat thereof as recorded in
Plat Book 13, Page 47, public records of
Pinellas County, FL together with the abutting
right-of-way of Douglas Avenue. (A96-14)
Zoning District
Single-Family Residential "Eight" (RS-8)
Section 2. The Central Permitting Director is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City
in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6020-96.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and legal
sufi! ... n9Y: " /"
".t :
Leslie K. Dougall- ide
Assistant City Attorney
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 6021.96
. .. < ~ . . , . . ~ ., , , ~J. '. . ., " ~._. - -~-.,. . -.-
:J<"
--.__.~ l~fiMII nllf"~l1 .. ~'_.....~.~~M ~ ~~
1 ~IA_ T----~--~
.-.
.. .
- ~ .,.
.I. I . - J J ... .l'" ~.- I ,.".. I ,.0 .. r .... 1.. I..... t. _
:I 'S
I. .. It ..
S 4 ...
. ;S 5 . 7
. I 22 21 20
'110' iii
.. &I U
~: .\ \~.:, /~ a ,._~ 8 'IEI~ 1 3 ~15 t 6! T e~9 ~ II rlF-~ {--;'5 6 7
... /.(a. a / ~ · !;,LOI:I ~ ..J
'r--. CIRC1..E.---4 I" ; 01 f~ a 5 Cl ~ Z ~ 2J r 2D II 18 IT'~ _~_! ~:I t 22 I q eo
~ . g.1 .. C 31 ., 46 · e j i a
~ : :: : 8 3 30 .. / ~ lOa. - ... ~ ll& sa.... sa && .. &I .. ~ s::t :.' .J ~.
2S 2S P:7 21 211 ~..,;;;:;..- 1._.... f--...:t..~ ~. y
- ~ - e J ~ '-...HV" ViIoon \
... .. ~ -- J.....
I .' fI1 113 ~ TI&O ~uo ... ~ IIlli _.. M.
31 1Ia. 31' 311 3ll:;.... ";!i ."..,43 I l! :j If e ~ if 4 8 16 E I II 10 (: II I ..' 4 S Ii
J :: II I :.;;! ~ 1...-. ~-----tii I I ..... .v ~
..... : 60 1 I 10< T ; I II "
. ...: DUNEDIN' · · · .. ~!:!!....-.. 14 l2<U 1-.' _ 107 ;- III iuo '_.'. ... III J ... M ..
;~::;::T-::-!;!.-; i ~ ~~;; ~T'"::':.: :-...~:- ~ 51; ;-q~.ill;~iiiril:'
- - - - ..;. 1-- - .~ (U .:: = ;:1: ii~:ii; ~t':::i: illila i!ii~i!:lii ira,r.'1111fj ~r~' ~1j; ~~1 f:.
I Cl 11 12 13 t 4 1 S ... ., 1 2 n J.i., 9 :;:::........: :::::::'.':'." ::::::,." :.<, ::.:.:.:.:...... ::::::::::;,:. ::::::::!:: :<~:::.: : ::::w.:. !Jt,.:.. :.:.:.:',>:. .,n",: :;~k: <~~.:..
r '--?3 ~x 5 ~ 1!m4 ,:" :::;:;;;;~~;:;;; ~~ I 3~11 34 '!j,:.':. ..: ,:.' '. :.: ::~:;~; tl:i~ I ;'Ij~: ~7 I?'~ :I~ 2:3
~ h. ~ -wi . =: r.,-:: I'f :.i: :.: .:::.:-:;~ 11~' '.: !t.:.: *::~:~;:. ::rl-r:I"::;~~ ~ ':;:~@j 1:~ly:t11~~ ~
24 2.3 22 21 20 1 i 1 a" . emftl': :r::::::::;::;: 1 it I il .::;' t::: ::1:)1:~:::1:~1,:. :::1t;: l& .~{ :;: !l '1,~,1f!! .: ~1;1:~ ~
1\ 11 10 i.......... ':: .. '. ......... .
~ I ~ i ~ I I~ a5 = 7 .. :I PN..W ~~ ... I
I u ~!I/~/S /~~m~:.:I;=:: ,:!!L~J.!ll~;:!z:~~
'a ~ 12 IJ " "r/ '/- . ~ I 2, ...3J ~ I -. .,. =I; 51 , ).Id i I : I I I !
.-u Ir~ I. / " ,y~ 1 1tN. f. - . s edNJoA /"
22 21 20 Ii 7 / E 131'12. 10 ~ :: t It l!.-II I I. I~ _ ~ :: I..
1:It :.!! '! 11 · l! -; .. -:: ! :! ..::= ,. to:! 11 ~ c!:! Ii:: I !
E i Ii!! L-1_ ~ -~1II t ~..r 7 Ie r I 3- 4-7 12 toS 1. 15 US 17,
lET I J.,. 4 ; ,. IV( .., I 11M 1 I. T I I
~1~"~1 Is.. 3 141~.:rbll'Y8AZn., 1Q rt 1~ 13 '~ 151,'8 11 181'
I fi: ~ [g,!li / /= 3 rg I ,~ ~ Z 1 Z ! Llll I r ) I I I"!! ~I ,;,_
9 10~' '2 :iz,!' I ,2 _.... 4' a - I - - ~ F' C~~lio
:r J --0'''' t1 ~ 2.oM ,. I /~ ~ 1 i ~ Ii '''i If"
.... "j ,..... _ _. r, /,~.....::>..... t;;;Je\. I 3 . - · /I~. ..
S 24 25 2S 27 28
-- .. ...
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
AND ZONING
COUNTY:
CITY :
~ONING
R-3
RS 8
A: ~6.'4
PROPERTY DESCflIPTJON:
Part Lots 5-8, BJk AI Cleardun
OWNER: Clement, L C
ADDRESS: 2077 Douglas Av
RIGHT -()f.WA Y:
ACRES: O. '6
ACRES:
ATLAS PAGE: 251 B
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
SEe; 03 TWP: 29 SAGE: 1 5 E
CITY COMMISSION
, . . -. , .
. ...:'.. . . : . , . . . '
. , . . .
. "', ~',' ,(/':;1"' ~.~ I:...' . ~ . ',1._ ""'..-.. ,'''.,~
hI -'jD V
\
t
Vl
.
.
"
o
:::.
PO
~
J
l
t
I
...
i
.
~
~
Q
WI
---
lit
,
I
I ..
j ~ -t--~
e i
~
i
,.
~
'.....~ I'l
.
...
='
100'-
~
II .....
__0:) ra
...1
... ....,.;
- .....
Q
;;II.
">>I" ,rftM)oP
...
..
"
,
i
i
-~t-
i
o
u
g:
:5
....
I
---'-"
I
a.I
~z
Ii
-
i
I
'III ,.."
t:
..
<//'
..'" w
.
j
i
"11''' --r ......,..
t
I
~.
.,." .ou... -
.
:
~.
:~
.
D
III
o
~{.(.
1j""".~
"Is
~
..
'"
II.
~~~
,
. . . \' ',' . " . . '''. .
. . .. '
" .
. .
J
...1.
>-
-
~D
~ .....
J~
....
Q
.,b
Q'\
~
;J
~
~
N
Q
.,b
~
o
z
~
(/.)>
<r--
U_
Z~
0-
~~
~~
U<
~>
;:<
~~
<u
~<
Z~
~ "'J
Z~
O~
~O
~=
<~
~=
~~
~O
O~
::r:
~
.J
~
=
o
~
(/.)
~
~
<
~
Z
~
~
~
!
u
CIS
Q,~
00-
.....c
O~
100 '(;
ClI ;..
.c-<
EI
='
z
~
.=-
- =
= ~
o=:
~
~
t)l)
-< b
.~
~
:l
....
-
..
=
]
~
"0
3
.!:
"0
~
~
'~
~
~
c=
::I
.!:
co
.c:
c=
o
'z:l
~
~
..
tJ
~
~
r--
o
Q\
-
~
.:.c
100
~
Cl..
ClI
EI 0
o ell
=~
~.....:l
:C.J
0-
~~
WI ~
;.-.0
Q~
~!G
.J1I"l
..
~
"0
"0
V')
V')
~
::l
o
.c:
.0
::I
U
6
"0
3
~
"O~
::a
..8
~
E
::l
.c:
CI')
\0
II"l
0-
-
fA
..
~
~I
~u
EI ~
o '
::r:~
~CiS
.- >>
.0 ~
Oal
~ 0
;.-....
CIS.....
~:;
00
-
::00
=t"l
~N
b
'~
~
~
c=
o
Z
-
-
r-l
~
.:.c ..
100 ~
~I
s_
ou
::r: ~
~-g
.- 0
.go::
~ ~
..c:
ctl tJ
S4)
';al
Cl.. '
r./)
C
'[i <:;
p.o.'Q'
(\ec\/
...
1)
"0
'0
V')
V')
~
3
~
...J
<:
-
z
V')
-
C"~
~
..
1
~
o
-d
~
CiS
>>
~
a:l
o
oC-
u.....
c"'3
~o
-
it 2':
~ "
ZN
b
'~
~
t"l
(;l
..c:
c=
.9
-
~
II)
..
tJ
~
..
vi
II)
o
.c
VI
~
...
o -
.c 5
-0"
::a ~
.8<t=
e-S
::I c=
.c 0
r./) E
M
V')
-
N
~
...:
.:z:r./)
.. ~
III '
=--"0
~
..-
~a:l
.- >>
f"O
p.o. ~
ClIO
"6hV')
Cr--
CIS 0
'C 0
p.o.-
...
~
"0
'0
V')
V')
"0
::a
.8
~
lE
::l
.c:
CI')
o
-
V')
-
N
(A
~
.0
~
II)
-
II)
0..
....
ll)
"i
~
ll)
U
II>
= :'
~"O
'E~
ClSr:x:l
t.:li;'
~al
.... 0
f-
p.o.~
~o
-r;; c;
~'"
~N
(C"
....
ll)
"0
'0
V')
V')
~
3
.!:
"0
~
"'C
::a
o
.0
ll)
lE
::l
.c
VI
~
o
.c:
.0
::I
[3
00
.-
N
(A
o
OIl
.:z: ::a
.....J
CIS ..
Cl..od
ClI ~
s0:5
o II)
:I:-
o
~ c=
:= 's
.0 II)
or./)
~\O
.~ \0
;~
0-
M
o
N
N
(A
2:'
'~
~
t:-
"0
]
~
::I
o
.c::
.0
::l
U
-0
~
.8
II)
E
::l
.c::
r./)
...:
CI')
J
::l
c=
Il)
~
<
"l:l'::;
=\0
O'Q'
.00
ClSr--
\)IIV')
';r--
1 (
...
Il)
"0
'0
In
V')
:E'
'u
~
c=
,9
-
~
Il)
...
tJ
Il)
...
"cf
~
..8
Il)
8
::l
.c:
CI')
o
'Q'
o
N
N
fA
OIl
!3
.0
~
Il)
-
Il)
c:l.o
t:~
o ::a
~c:l.o
~ ~
--
:Ed)
o c=
;:Ei:i:
:l.J
,:&:CI')
CIS.::;
.JQ\
Cii'Q'
- -
"'0
t'M
uQ\
...
~
"0
'0
V')
V')
>>
:.::
'u
~
c=
o
.;:::
~
~
...
tJ
~
..
-d
~
..8
II)
lE
::I
.c:
r./)
'Q'
o
'Q'
N
fA
..
II)
li
;>0
~ ~
Bod
o ~
::r:@
~~
.- II)
.0 ~
o ~
~ 0
ClI 0
.~~
:=0
~V')
-N
~\O
..
~
"0
'0
V')
V')
]
.8
II)
e
::I ~
..c: 0
VI.c
~ VI
- ~
8.]
"0 .
~ ~
~"O
~ c=
..c: ::I
E'~
g e
... 0
g 8
.=~
~ ~
u:"::
~:E
V')
\0
';;
..c:
c=
.9
(;j
II)
..
tJ
Il)
..
-0
~
.8
II)
lE
::I
.c
r./)
CIl
e
~
~
-<
~
~
EI
CIS
Z
..
II)
-
~
~
~
U
-d
~o::
._ 0
UOIl
.. ~
~...J
.- ..
f ~
~ ~
~ ~
CIS-
~u
5~
_\0
u-
'Q'
V')
N
~
V')
\0
N
fA
..
II)
c;;
.:z: ~
.. Il)
CII-
Cl..u
ClI ~
S~
0-
::r:a:l
~ >>
- ~
:cr:x:l
Q 0
~.::
ell:;
:20
IIIV')
].1\0
CIS-
...IN
j
u '" '" '"
CD
< () ~ 0 0 ~
~ '0 '0
"0 ~ "0 "0 .~
on 11"I 11"I
on 11"I 11"I ~
:l
u
GI
Q,u
CI.)-
....J:l
o \11II
==
a. \11II
u ~
J:l<
B
:s
:z
b
oC-
... =
g~
~
II
'.C
'a
41
a
<
~
s
~
'0
a
"0
8.
e
e
s:::
o
".,
e
(J
~
E
g
'"
s:::
.sa
-
co
e
~
'0
~
~
.8
o
E
::s
.c:
II)
g
Cl..
N
\0
E
o
e
s:::
,sa
-
co
~
(,)
~
'0
a
]
.8
o
E
::s
.c:
en
\0
H
0\':::
~.s
~s:::
o
E-=-
\0 5
'-' '"
~
100
\11II
=-
u
8
=
:=
~ t
:s~
~ ~
stO
IJ ~
... C<2
:!a:l
~g
'E~
~o
~~
::IN
c:8N
"1';j
a
]
.8
o
E
::s
.c:
<II
~
"0
8-
'0
o
~
o
.c:
~~ ~ 1
:a '0 bh
::s S ~
o~ is:
~ '"
H
8-
=u
:= ~
u'g
== 0
J:l~
='0
~ .-
... 2
IJO
~~
....M
a:N
E
e
s:::
o
'~
~
'"
~
~
....
. .', -', ...',... I '"
P\~.<: V
I I
e
"
~
~
u
8
II
:z
~
\11II
~
41 '"
8 ~
~ I
==-
~u
:s ~
~~
cSZ
80\
=-
CJv.i
E::)
410\
..el.....
=~
~N
o
.....
N
CiI')
o
o
\0':::
~.s
~s:::
o
E-=-
\0 5
'-' '"
~
0\
N
~
....
s:::
~
o
o ,....
g~ .S
MO/)O
~s:::;>
'C 0
~ E
e-~
reo
, " _ '.tI. ., ' .
, . " ,..... . . -' " . ~
~
100
\11II
~
u
8
=
:::
u '"
i!
- ()
~u
r: ~
... III
~a:l
~g
'E~
!:o
~~
::IN
c8N
~
100 0
\11II 0/)
=- !a
u~
8 ~
=og
::c: 0
~cx:
:E '"
Q 0
~~
~~
e~
~-:!
other paperwork for
Item #11 moved to
6-6-96
;.
1
I
I
1
I
~
~
t
I
!
I
!
"
'.
.'
F56
, . ... . - _. ...
, , , . , '.
ORDIN~NCE NO. 5992-96
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING
SECTION 35.11, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE
DEFINITIONS FOR NURSING HOME AND RESIDENTIAL
SHELTER BY INCREASING THE DENSITY CONVERSION FROM
TWO BEDS TO THREE BEDS PER UNIT; AMENDING SEC. 42.34
(6), CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO CHANGE THE PARKING
REQUIREMENT FOR NURSING HOMES FROM THE
EQUIVALENT OF ONE PARKING SPACE PER TWO BEDS TO
ONE PARKING SPACE PER THREE BEDS, TO CHANGE THE
PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL SHELTERS
FROM ONE PARKING SPACE PER SIX RESIDENTS TO ONE
PARKING SPACE PER SEVEN RESIDENTS, AND TO CHANGE
THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR GROUP CARE FACILITIES
TO ONE PARKING SPACE PER ;THREE OCCUPANTS,
INCLUDING RESIDENT EMPLOYEES AND SUPERVISORS;
AMENDING SEC. 40.545 (3), CODE OF ORDINANCES,
RELATING TO THE USE LIMITATIONS FOR THE
PUBLIC/SEMIPUBLIC ZONING DISTRICT, TO DECREASE
DENSITY FOR NURSING HOMES AND RESIDENTIAL
SHELTERS FROM 15 TO 12.5 UNITS PER GROSS ACRE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S LAND USE PLAN AND IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL'S
COUNTYWIDE RULES FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL
CLASSIFICATION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section 35.11, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 35.11. Definitions.
(~
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this development code, shall have
the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a
different meaning:
*
*
*
..
*
Nursing home means a health facility where persons are housed and furnished with meals
and continuing nursing care for compensation. For the purpose of computing density of a nursing
home, every ~ tw9 beds within the facinty shall be considered to equal one dwelling unit.
*
*
*
*
*
Residential shelter means a building, dwelling or portion thereof, the use of which is for a
nonprofit service providing a place of temporary residence to homeless persons or families. For
the purposes of density, one dwelling unit shall equal ~ two persons housed on the premises.
Ordinance No. 5992-96
", \, ., , " .' ." ,,' J,'
. . ,
c ' " ...
. ~. ; .. ..,.. , , ',-' , ,
*
*
.
*
*
\~
Section 2. Sec. 42.34 (6) (d) 1. d., Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 42.34. Parking.
(1) Purpose. It is the purpose of this section to establish standards which promote the
orderly, efficient and safe layout of parking areas designed to complement the use they serve.
*
*
.
*
*
(6) Off street parking spaces.
.
*
*
*
*
(d) Schedule. The following shall be the minimum number of offstreet parking spaces
required for each land use, activity, building or structure permitted by this
development code. 'Nhen the determination of the number of required offstreet
parking spaces results in a requirement of a fractional space, any fraction less than
one-half space or more shall be rounded up. Parking spaces required on the basis
of building floor area shall apply to gross floor area unless otherwise specified.
Parking spaces required for employees shall be based on the maximum number of
employees on duty or residing, or both, on the premises at anyone time, which
would include any overlap of employees at a change of shift.
1. Residential and lodging uses.
*
.
*
*
*
d. Nursing homes: One parking space per ~ two beds occupied at
maximum capacity.
e. Group care facilities: One parking space per three occupants at
maximum capacity. including resident employees and supervisors
for the first six persons, plus one space for each additional six or
ffaGtion thereof, plus one space per two nonresident employees or
supervisors.
*
.
*
.
.
g. Residential shelters: One parking space per seven ~ residents,
based on maximum occupancy approved by the city. A minimum of
one space shall be required for each shelter.
*
.
*
.
.
Section 3. Sec. 40.545 (3), Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
ORDINANCE NO. 5992.96
2
The following use limitations shall apply to publicJsemipublic districts:
l;t
Sec. 40.545. Use limitations.
.
.
.
*
*
(3) Nursing homes and residential shelters shall have a maximum density of ~ 49
units per gross acre.
.
..
..
*
*
Section 4. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
April 18, 1996
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
t fO"
\ r ,- /'
i .J../~(" ,,7-. i1{ ( - J:."'t L..
Leslie Dougall-Sfde ~I Asst. City Attorney
"'....
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
3
ORDINANCE NO. 5992-96
..
13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF
BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WEST OF MEADOW LAtRK LANE,
CONSISTING OF LOT 9, BLOCK 5, BAYVIEW CITY
SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 3014
CAROLINA AVENUE, TOGETHER WITH THE ABUTTING ALLEY
TO THE NORTH AND THE ABUTTING RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
CAROLINA AVENUE ON THE SOUTH, INTO TAE-CORPORATE
LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY
LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the
City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
Lot 9, Block 5, Bayview City Subdivision, according to the map or plat
thereof as recorded in the Plat Book 9, Page 43, of the public records of
Pinellas County, FL, together with the abutting alley to the North and the
abutting right-of-way of Carolina Avenue on the South. (A96-12)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the
dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have
heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the
City Clerk and the Central Permitting Director are directed to include and show the property
described herein upon the official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk
shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Ronda, within 7 days after
adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after
adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
April 18, 1996
Rita GaNey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to fonn and
Ie a ufficiency: ".- -,
,
Attest:
. "
. . C '
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides,'
\
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 6014-96
... ~~ I ._..4-h..: ..,- ."" '~, . ,: , , .. " .' " '.~ .....__.__"_
~, .
~011
~
112
113
".
"
~~~.+~ ~- J ~ 2 ~cb: &~,
~\....l-o ~ " A S ~ l~
) ~ 12,1 10 9 7
(2 \\'44 4e '1~1 ~ ~ U BA Y aDJ~:tA~ iJ1'
~\ 147 1~ s.:s 0 Q~ ..~,
IoCIlI:IJ<<I)fT \ () ~ 1 ~ ~" __ ~ . ..J:
........" \ 46 1 $4 ~ lOt I
4 ~ 144 1505_ ~e.
1"-' ~ ~7 1 I 2 ,.1'
1- '42 ~ ~ ~
~"'1i)'" t47 lsa ~..~' ...;.~ "
m 131 7..0 1~ ~
121 1>> I 138 IISO Ala '.. , 110
~ ~I'
1~ 133/ 138 181 :.
124 1)j 137 162 ~
123 1~- 134 18.1 ~ ~~~NN' . , ~~ S
".lentlon ~ i It 1;1 I~I ~ . <D ~ ,..
i'6a87M~,e48.162al60~g Ano '~'i::sI~i~ ":~Ja '=>. ~ 7 8 g ,
~ I "11~(~)~1 6 ~. . ~, .: .,~, ",. J:~-:-h~ ~ i
12) a; 6 Voc. 617t-290-
po 12 11 10 . @ 7 , R " )- 23 22 :21' 20' 1 g , B KAJOR'S
a ~ .. - . ,~ ~ - - 1 MANOR
a ~ i i . . . 8 7:~ .. ~ ~..(.; K.... .. 37-84
...... 'f. ..............
"
>>OQ '~"'I<I'll.!"'A""""" AVENUE .. v.c. 2640-686
: ~." iiin ii r'~ <<11 / TRAVEL co. C-"
I ~ 1 2 ~H)3 4 5 6 ~<t)t 2 3 4 5 TRAILER ~
9 "T IJ ...... S J tot ~ 23/02
\ 8 l 7 .E :!5 23/03
.,p \'2 11 ~ 0 9 e 7 ~ 1 10 9 ~ ~ ~ , j P A~K
nJ~ Iii &0 iml il K ~ J1 a
s I .,-.- ,g' ~,-
13
to,- . ~
1 2 4
6~ ~ 13
.. .
~ 10 9 8 7 S
.. IS
..
a R
...... A,.
~
'OL.,
'cat ~7
~ ".
.!...05 '"~
104 120
103 lZ'1
102 122
r--.....
m~,
1 2 3' 5
'3' -
aM - "
~ 10 9_ 8 7 6 ~
U46-f1"lI
..
1 2 3 4 5
BA',! ru.iL~
-
6 7 8 9
.. .~~
- , ~~
23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 ~
J,A 'E
U1
'M r '-A IJt
-
u:IWOCT
~7
, 4/01
40
-- ....
14/053
i Io<CItEIWDlf
~
leG
1/06
14/07
5
. I
"-.
s.'R. eo "
~ ~ ,-~
~ ,C)' ~ ~,~ Z04
~~ ~~4 10t'l;ii 20lS
~ ~ I . / 10 20G
'2 (d3 ~) ~~ lOt., 210
~ ~~ ~~ 111- 212
~ ~ 10? ~1~P: 21.
." ..z"o ,,'~ I/.'~;;';- 1"7- ""
---
- -
51 ' ~~. ~
ri\~ ~~ ~
~~ ~~~
1 1\ ~ ~nn
1 · 'R\~F
g; ~~ ~t1n~v~~ ~
Soft. eo ,
./'
~
GUlF
2 TO
GUlF
TO
B
BAY
a,'
1-
~ ., ,DR~
~ \ ~ .~
" ..~ 9 ~O ..., ~ ~1~~ TRA A !J
~ \\ ~\\ ~~ ~o A'JDrz \~ 1 ~ AREA
~~~~~r~~,~\ '~
(
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
AND ZONING
OWNER: Kach, J J & D A
ADDRESS: 30'4 Carolina A v
A: 96-' 2
COUNTY:
CITY :
ZONING
R-3
AS 8
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 9, Blk 5, Bayview City Sub
RIGHT -of-WA Y:
ACRES: O. '5
ACRES:
ATLAS PAGE: 292B SEC: '6 TWP: 29 S RGE: '6 E
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY COMMISSION
EXHIRIT A Ordinance No. 6014-96
QBDINAN~ NO. 6015-96
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERlY LOCATED EAST OF BAYVIEW
AVENUE AND WEST OF MEADOW lARK LANE, CONSISTING
OF lOT 9, BLOCK 5. BAYVIEW CITY SUBDIVISION, WHOSE
POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 3014 CAROLINA AVENUE.
TOGETHER WITH THE ABUTTING ALLEY TO THE NORTH AND
THE ABUTTING RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CAROLINA AVENUE ON
THE SOUTH, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, AS SINGLE-FAMilY RESIDENTIAL 8 (RS-B);
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I Lf
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance
is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive
plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pine'las County, Florida, is hereby
zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is
amended, as follows:
Property Zoning Qistrict
Lot 9, Block 5, Bayview City Subdivision,
according to the map or plat thereof as Single-Family Residential 8 - RS8
recorded in Book 9, Page 43, of the public records
of Pine lias County, FL, together with the abutting
alley to the North and the abutting right-of-way of
Carolina Avenue on the South. (A96-12)
Section 2. The Central Permitting Director is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City
in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section ~. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6014-96.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
April 18" lC)qh
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
Ie ai, ufficlency:
~ /
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 6015-96
~J..-'
,.'" ...
~~4J.' U t4...... ~
'\~ .. "\30
)
\\'48 .. 11~I
~ '\ 147 I ~
~ \t)~1!S
........" \ '46 1 $4
~ 1... 1505
II 1 'U ~
, U --.--; 142 t!i!
'"i'ia 130_ W" ,"
IV 131 L740 158
U. 132 ) 1311 'SO
125 ,337 1311 ,.,
IU ,iI 137 '.2
....
, 23 , j5" ,3G 143 \.---
~011
~
'\2
113
1'4
t1
~
iOH~7
~ II.
.!CllS ".
* 12:0
t<<J 111
t()2 122
C
:
i i
I ~
"
SI "
~D
loJo
~04
~
/e.e
~1
,.
E
II~
II
;el~ 57 &4 G.S I $4 63 &2 81 &0 !of
lIt,tentk1n
~
lEIWO(t
14-tJI07
14/01
- --
.
14/~ 1 106
i MlRfIlA)lT
ieG
~aq
14/07
I
"'-0
"
]
Is.oft,.
~
~ I($'
.;I:. ... :\.
~~
Cf! ..
~ ~~
~~O
~
." .....~
~ zg4
I~ 2lDI
to'lQ 2lDI
K>> ':' 21 0
111- 212
'"~ 214
"7-'" ,,,,
eo
I~I
~~
~l2
~
~ ,f:Ij
"fI' k
~~~
~~
,.... ~
~121~1: ~ G
~(1)~ 0>""
" F ~a _ i ~ =
12 11 10 9 7
"E~!Y' ...:: ~1
10'-. J1
1 2
~~
~ .
4
3
~ 10 9 a 7
j ~ II
Jl R
&
.
. "
'!'
.
--. "IV
I
.,i
~-
1011 I'
'k>> ~
111 . ,. "
-110
. ~N
~ .
4 i fl .~ Ilf I
~ UI~~~!5).i'~ i
:3G~2 11 10 @ 7 l. ~ . ~ ~ 2~ 22 2" 201- lG 18 V~~f
Iii I 8 7 S~ CZJ _ ~J?_aK.. _ _ _ 37-84
ry: ...."........
S3 -.. ~ AVDU _ Ytc;.. 2'e40-",
: ~ 4"ii il i ii I~~ #()1 V TRAVEL" ,
I B I 2 3 4 56.$"0.: '-J. 2 ;) 4 5 TRAILERC Ct.:l
s 9-43 ~ (~UB -. 2:5/02
\ ~ e ... 7l:~ PARK 23(03
;/ \ 12 "~O 9 8 Z3~~ g i:!."-; & LJ 2
.. ~~ \ Iii &0 tilQ II" ~~" a
I I .s41-~ tIT o~ So It. eo' R GOLF 2 lO
"__- - ---
- -
GUlf' TO 8 SAY
~ r ,,~1-~ ~\.~ ~~._ .DR~
I ~ ~ ~,,~ ~.. ~ -:1\~]m4 4 ~
'n~\3 s,,3 1 ()Pf~ ~."",~~)~..,~~ ~~--t.~K '
1 ~ ' " "i. ~~\~;r~~~I\)\-. f\ ~ ~
~ '" CAY .., ~ ",\_x...&.\\~~. \ ~ iI.
1""'-0__ a&4II ..10
an "
'23""5
'3'-
1M -- "
I 10 g 8 7 6
3 ----
lD'-
1 a i
~ .
1~ .~ ,~l~
U1
1 2 3 " 5 6
~ iJ' 'JJ!; l.. .I="
-oI~ ~
2,3 22 21 20 I ,g
AD
~
.
c
..
,,~-~~
. w:NtStJ
.~j';-~
a
. ,
-
. .,
<D~'"
7 8 g I
~
.' - t~~7 ~~ I ~
. '"
40
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
AND ZONING
OWNER: Kach, J J & D A A: 96-12
ADDRESS: 301 4 Carolina A v
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
N,NING Lot 9, Blk 5, Bayview Cit)l Sub
COUNTY: R.3 ACRES: 0.15
CITY: RS 8
RIGHT -of-WAY: ACRES:
ATLAS PAGE: 2928 SEe: 16 lWP: 29 S RGE: 16 E
fLANNI NO AND ZONING BOARD CITY COMMISSION
Ordjn~nre No. 6015-96
Item #
15
E rJ .1-
CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Meeting Date
5~.Ct~
SUBJECT: Shop Drawing Review - pier 60 Park
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Authorize a work order (attached) to Post, Buckley, Schuh
& Jernigan (PBS&J), Engineer of Record, for shop drawing review for the
architectural services components associated with the above project and approve
a transfer of $16,820 to the proj ect code from the unappropriated retained
earnings of the General Fund.
~ And that the appropriate official be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
o This is a project which could be done in-house by the Engineering services
Department if sufficient personnel and time allowed.
o These shop drawings are supplied by the contractor for conformance with
design concept of the project and information given in the contract
documents.
o PBS&J designed this project and would, therefore, be the logical choice to
review the shop drawings.
o Funding in the amount of $16,820 will be provided with the appropriation of
unappropriated retained earnings of the General Fund. Revenues from the
concession lease at an estimated $150,000 per year will be captured in the
General Fund as a General Fund revenue.
I
I
I Revi ewed by:
I
I LegaL ~~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! IS
I
I ACH
I
! Other
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N/A !
Jc..~ I
I
,',L -----.. I
\, J > .'(f~l :
Submi tted' b~: ,,'/ I I
'Ay~~ I
c;~ /<..:. i
I
Budget ;1
purChaSing', ~
Risk Mgmt. N/A
Originating Dept_
.
Engineering /7,\
(. .---
,:', ,.' ,f?
User Dept.1
Parks & Recreati
Costs:$ 16,820
Commission Action
Advertised:
(Current FY) 1996
Approved
Funding Source:
Approved
w/conditions _____
Denied
Capt. Imp.
Date:
Operating
Other
Cont1cJ to
Paper:
Not required
Affected parties
notified
Appropriation Code(s)
Attachments:
\Jark Order
Site PLan
315-93288-561300-572-000
Not required
IJJopdr.lIQn
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
P8S&J WORK ORDER INITIATION FORM
15
Date: March 4, 1996
PBS&J Project No.
City Project No. ~nR-010Rqfi
1. PROJECT TITLE:
Pier 60 Park Archi tectural S hop Drawing Review
2. SCOPE OF WORK:
PBS&J shall provide shop drawing review and comment for the architectural services
components associated with the subject project. These elements include architectural
structural, mechanical and electrical components.
PBS&J shall review shop drawings supplied by Contractor(s) for conformance with design
concept of the project and infonnation given in the contract documents. Review of any shop
drawing is limited to general design concepts and general compliance with the information in
the project plans and specifications only, and is not intended to be a verification of total
material required or that all items required are shown. Review shall not relieve the Contractor
from the responsibility of details of design, dimensions, job conditions, construction means
and methods, coordination with other trades, or any other requirements of the plans,
specifications or contract. Any notations on the shop drawings made by PBS&J shall not be
construed to authorize work or cost.
Review of design calculations and drawings prepared by specialty engineers is limited to
design intent and does not constitute a detailed check of calculations nor does it relieve the
specialty engineers from the responsibility of the detailing of the specialty component or
system.
3. PROJECT GOALS:
To review shop drawings for the architectural features of the planned Pier 60 Park, in
accordance with previously completed construction plans.
4. BUDGET:
A maximum fee of $16,820 has been established for this work order.
S. SCHEDULE:
The PBS&J schedule shall be determined by submittals made by the contractor.
hn:Y:\COMMON\CLRW ATgR\WORKORI)\SI-l(W!)WOARC - 1 .
'/-.,.
6.
PBS&J STAFF ASSIGNMENTS:
Jim Kennedy 877 -72 7 5
Avinash Gupta (800) 597-7275, ext 355
IS
7. CORRESPONDENCE/ REPORTING PROCEDURES:
Correspondence will be sent to Richard Baier, City Engineer.
8. INVOICING/FUNDING PROCEDURES:
The budget for this work order is $16,820. Invoicing Method A, Cost Times Multiplier Basis
shall be used for project invoicing.
315-93288-561300-572-000
9. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The City will provide shop drawings for PBS&J review as submitted to the City by the
Contractor.
10. PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT:
To be determined.
PREPARED BY:
CITY
S-I/-?l,
Date
3 "'I.C;~
Date
,
,
!
I
4
t
~
!
8
:i
~
i
~
!'f,
~
...
"
f;
J
i
,
\'.
tm:Y:\COMMON\CLRWATER\\VORKORD\SHOPDWG.ARC - 2 -
(.l , ..,. ',,,,,'" , .. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cler@
SUBJECT: Follow up from April 29, 1996 Work Session
COPIES: Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager
DATE: April 30, 1996
In response to questions raised at the April 29, 1996, Work Session the following answers
are provided in fmal agenda order.
CItem ~- Shop Drawings for Pier 60 park: The multiplier to be used for the work by
Post, Buckley, Shoo and Jernigan is 2.96.
Item # 1 - Memorial Causeway Bridge: The cost of the SEI Study is $743,668 plus a
$115,521 (20% contingency. The level of contingency is stand for this type of study. Thus
far, none of the c tingency has been spent. To upgrade to 11 NEPA PD&E study will cost
$39,400. Subtrac' g this amount from the existing ntingency leaves a contingency of
approximately $76, The Resolution regarding Sta unding is in the agenda pack. County
and State Funding will e added to the investigation funding listing.
Item #25 - Beautl cation Committee' Information regarding whether the Committee
believes 7 members are su rovided after the Committee meets on Wednesday
morning.
Miscellaneous(no n this or a
pment Council: Mr. Evans has served one two year term on
Item #28 - EconomiC De
this council (5/94 to 5/96),.
DOT Signs ich Baier will req st the sign at 510 Cleveland Street be moved out of the
trees. Clearwater be added to he northbound sign coming out of St. Petersburg.
e-^,~ Jy\0
~.
\0-
Cl"A. ~x,-cJ, '-'f
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet
TO: Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager
FROM: Richard J. Baier, City Engineer;f
COPIES: Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Man ,ger
William C. Baker, Assistant Cit~anager
SUBJECT: Pier 60 Park Costs
DATE: April 19, 1996
Per your request, the following are the costs paid to date to Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan,
Engineer of Record, for the Pier 60 Park:
Architectural Services
Site Design
Concept Drawings
$71,040
73,529
S,400
i
i
I
,
i
\
i
I
I
...
~
~
!
I
.
I
i
I
I
I
1
Total
$150,969
The construction contract for the park awarded to Caladesi Construction is for a total of
$1,210,425.00, of which $161,274.17 has been paid to date.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 6042.
RJ 81m p
, . . .
" .', .,
,-.' . .
See Agenda Drawings
#15 5-2-96
F fo~ .
C:':
~t '.'
:. .<,,<' ,;'
1" '"
, It-:.
Item # 16
""
, .
,.
,
F 10
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #:
10
Meeting Date:
~:;~ ~7G
SUBJECT:
Central Permitting and Code Enforcement Computer Software
RECOMMEN DATI aNI MOTION:
Award a contract to Tidemark Computer Systems of Seattle, WA being the most responsive bid submitted
in accordance with the specifications, for the purchase of Permit*Plan CS, Permit*Plan Cashier software,
first year maintenance and related services at an esti mated cost of $105,000.00; approve the esti mated
expenditure of $42,000.00 for Digital Equipment Corporation AXP computer, in accordance with City
Code 2.564(d), other governmental bids; financing of the computer equipment in the amount of
$42,000.00 to be provided under the City's master lease-purchase agreement
lEI and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
· This proposed purchase will provide an integrated software package to produce occupational licenses
and building permits; and track building inspections and code enforcement activities
· The new software will replace the obsolete occupational licenses system developed in the late 1970'5
and running on a Unisys mainframe; the building permit/inspection program (Cornerstone) installed
in August, 1987 and the code enforcement tracking program (Comply) installed in August 1987, both
of which run on a personal computer network
· All three of the current programs have surpassed the industry standard three to five year average life
expectancy for computer software appl ications
· The current PC based software systems experience frequent system errors, causing us to reduce our
customer service level and sometimes lose information
· The vendor for the Cornerstone and Comply systems is unable to provide adequate support for the
products, hence maintaining the current systems is not feasible. In addition, the current systems
cannot run under Windows 95, the new City standard PC operating system
o The Cornerstone and Comply systems operate completely independent of each other, forcing the
input and maintenance of redundant data. The information in these systems cannot be accessed on a
City wide basis.
Reviewed by:
legal ~
Budget. /
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
IS
ACM '/ .-
Central
Permitting
Comm.
Response
Originating Department:
Central Permitting
Community Response
User Department:
Central Permitting
Communi! Res onse
Costs:
Commission Action:
$147,000 0 Approved
Total 0 Approved with Conditions
$58,700 0 Denied
Current Fiscal Year 0 Continued to:
Advertised:
Funding Source:
~ Capitallmprovernenl:
~ Operaling:
315-94707
010-01410-5916-
5 1 8-000
Date: June 9 & 16, 1995
o Olher:
Attachments:
Submitt~, y: ,7 . ,,).
:'~'ccft~~ \ /eL C .(j
~~aJager rr
: Paper: Pinellas Cnty Revlfmpa
('t Trib, Wall Street Journal
D Not Required
Affected Parties
o Notified
D Not Required
Contract
Appropriation Code:
Bid Tabulation
315-94707
o None
o Printed on recycled paper
· The proposed Permit *' Plan software from Tidemark combines all data into one database, el iminating
redundancy and increasing accuracy. The Permit *Plan system will reside on the City's Enterprise
Network, allowing access to the data (with proper security controls) to all departments on the
network, including Engineering, Finance, and the City Manager's Office.
· Central Permitting, Community Response and Information Services were involved in the selection
process.
· The selection team attended system demonstrations, conducted 12 telephone reference checks and
took two site visits to see the Tidemark system operating in a live environment.
· A request for qual ification (RFQ) was done in June 1995, following an unsuccessful request for
proposal (RFP) in May, 1995.
· The RFP results were considered unsuccessful due to the I imited number of vendors responding and
the cost of the applications. However, the RFQ results were much the same as the RFP, indicating
that we were seei ng an accurate representation of the products avai lable.
· Tidemark was the only vendor responding to both the RFP and RFQ that offered a state of the art,
cI ient/server based computer system.
. This agenda request also includes one Digital Equipment Corporation AXP database server.
. The AXP server is a state of the art, RISC based system, capable of pro\liding data and processing
seNices to 25 + Permit*Plan system users. It is used to store large database fj les and handles
resource intensi\le inquiries and reporting functions.
. The AXP computer comes with an one-site 3 year warranty for all CPU components. It is "open
systems compatible", meaning it can run a variety of operating systems and can be seamlessly
integrated onto the City's Enterprise computer network.
. 1he details of the costs of the Tidemark Permit*Plan system follow:
fm.e~c~i"'liQ'O~()~~:!\;?J;~i!S'( ;,': ' :.X205(,' '. . Esti mated "FY' ,95j9.6;0QsV:,::,if;;.L~<:\::~:i:}
Permit *Plan CS $ 25,000. $25,000.
Permit Plan Cashier $ 3,250. $ 3,250.
Installation (estimate) $ 38,000. $ 19,050.
1rainin (estimate) $ 4,000. $ 0
Travel/Lad in (estimate) $ 12,000. - $ 20,000. $ 6,000.
First Year Maintenance Contract $ 8,200. $ 0
Conversion of Existin Data (est) $ 6,000. $ 3,000.
TOTAL $9&,550 - $104,550 $ 56,300.
. The following other associated costs of the project do not require an agenda item, but are provided
for informational purposes:
Oracle database license (25 concurrent users)
PowerBuilder 4lh Generation programming language
Three 24 pin dot matrix printers
(to print multi part forms)
Two 9 pin dot matrix printers (for forms)
28.8 MPS Modem (for vendor dial up support)
Frame Relay (communications link) to Vine St. Office
Windows NT File Server license
Windows NT client licenses
$10,000.
5,000.
2,000.
500.
200.
5,000. plus $100 monthly cost
1,200.
760.
Upgrade memory to 20 PCs (4 Mb each)
Crystal Report Writer (for ad hoc reporting) - 5 users
Crystal Report Training (2 peopleJ2 classes each)
TOTAL ASSOCIATED COSTS
4,000.
1 ,500.
3,200. pi us travel expenses
33,360.
· An additional component of this system is an Interactive Voice Response System, which will be
suppl ied by a different \lendor. This will be hrought to the Commission as a separate agenda item.
The estimated price for the voice response system is $30,000.
· Estimated project start date is July 31, 1996, to allow City staff ti me to get office appl ication training
on the new Municipal Services Building network. Contracting with Tidemark at this time also allows
the City to avoid a sign incant system pricing structure increase scheduled for May 8, 1996. The FY
95/96 costs are prorated to reflect thi s start date.
· The mid year budget amendments will provide for a budget increase in the lease purchase financing
in the amount of $42,000 to project 315-94707, Central Permitting Upgrade, for the lease purchase of
the AXP computer.
· Funding for the debt service payments of approximately $2400 for FY 1995/96 are available in the
Central Permitting department operating line item 010-01410-591600-591-000. Funding for the debt
service for future years will be included in the City Manager's proposed budget in those years.
· Cash funding for the Tidemark Permit*Plan system and associated cost totals approximately
$138,500. Capital project 315-94707, Central Permitting Upgrade, has funding available in the
amount of $115,000. For these costs.
· The balance of $23,500 will be provided by a mid year budget amendment transferring the $23,500
from the Central Permitting operating budget (010-01410-591600-518-000) representing savings in
debt service costs to Capital Project 315-94707, Central Permitting upgrade.
· In addition, a mid year budget amendment will also appropriate $30,000 from the unappropriated
retained earnings of the General Fund to provide funding for the voice response system.
AXP Com puter
Tidemark Permit*Plan
System
Associated Costs
Voice Response System
Total
: C' '.,'.. ":;"""""t"i B"', 'd' ~.., ';'t':' '~:!,...>'... '. '; . <:':':."" :~' '::M"/ "'.:;,r~~"'"'''''' A;';':';"~';'<:"d" ,;",:~,""'>t" ';.>.i;;':'T" '."t">irl'~tfi';!':".i~;<;:;.t.:rb'''f;'t';~'; ".:.".".;',;. '!,,-~
"urren, U e ~""",;':";<';.":: ':: 1U";:'l~ear.>f;'\men meoo,.,t:. 0 a ARro Co.l"eQ ,,'" :;/
~~"';'/'~'~:~:~~~::~~'::;:f-::,~~ .:.~~;..;./..:" ~.,:~.P'l ;~~<:.~.: '7~::~':;:,r?/j \,,';'-,~~. ""/:::'~'\Y-5::-:~\'5'~~~\':',,'!:"~/;:/":': ",<I('~: ,.:(\~,;~\..:.\~t:W;.~:<:1,.,,~~~? ~:i)Y' ~~~..^':.(:.( ,t':"'~'~:~' ~':'i~:t:r!: v~~~;r~';:~~~'A.~ir;,~{ " _. .,~~
$ 42,000. $ 42,000.
$ 105,000.
$ 10,000.
$ 23,500.
$ 30,000.
$ 93,500.
$105,000.
$ 33,500.
$ 30,000.
$ 210,500.
$ 115,000.
CONTRACTFORSOF~AREPROGRAM
AND CONSULTANT SERVICES
TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
This Contract for Software Program and Consultant Services (hereinafter referred to as "this
agreementj Is entered Into by and between the City of Clearwater, a political subdivision of the
State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "L1censeej and Tidemark Computer Systems, Inc.,
a Washington corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Tldemarkj.
REPRESENTATIONS:
A. Tidemark has developed and is the owner of a proprietary computerized permit
management system called PERMIT*PLAN and has the capability to install and Implement this
system for Licensee.
B. Licensee desires to retain Tidemark to implement and Install the PERMIT*PLAN system
for Licensee.
C. Licensee and Tidemark wish to memorialize their agreements and are executing this
agreement to provide the complete terms and conditions of their mutual understandings.
AGREEMENTS:
Based upon the above representations and in consideration of the mutual promises, payments,
covenants and agreements herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Scope of Services and Products. The services and products governed by this
agreement are described on Exhibit A, Scope of Work, Products, and Implementation Plan.
2. Tidemark's Responsibilities. Tidemark agrees to provide the products and services
described on Exhibit A in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement.
3. Licensee's Responsibilities. Licensee agrees to cooperate with Tidemark In
Tidemark's performance of this agreement. Specifically, Licensee will furnish and supply those
items described on Exhibit C. Exhibit A contains a number of completion milestones relating to
the performance of various phases of the services to be provided under this agreement.
Tidemark's obligation to proceed under this agreement is subject to the Licensee's written
authority to proceed executed at the completion of Milestones 14 and 24 of the Implementation
Plan in Exhibit A. Licensee agrees to not unreasonably withhold its authority to proceed and to
promptly proVide the authority to proceed at each phase so as to permit Tidemark to complete its
performance in a timely manner.
If Licensee causes a delay in the implementation of this agreement exceeding 90 days, then
Tidemark reserves the right to increase its hourly rates under this agreement to the standard
rates charged its new PERMIT*PLAN customers.
4. Payment for Services and Products. In consideration of the services and products
provided by Tidemark pursuant to this agreement, Licensee will compensate Tidemark in
accordance with the Estimated Cost Summary and Payment Terms attached hereto as Exhibit
1
B. Except as otherwise provided on Exhibit 8, Tidemark's compensation Is on an hourly basis
for services perfonned.
A. Timing of Payments. Tidemark shall submit invoices for payment In
accordance with the payment schedule provided In Exhibit 8, and within thirty (30) days of
billing date Licensee will make payment of the billed amounts (less the retalnage described
below) to Tidemart. Payment shall be by check delivered to Tidemark at the address herein for
notices, or by wire transfer to Tidemark's bank account.
B. Retalnage. Licensee shall be entitled to withhold retainage of ten percent (10%)
from each payment paid to Tidemark (except travel reimbursements) except the final payment
under this agreement. All retalnage amounts shall be paid within thirty (30) days of final
completion of this agreement by Tidemark, and system acceptance by the Licensee.
C. Late Payment. Any payment due Tidemark not paid to Tidemark within thirty
(30) days of billing shall accrue a late payment fee as governed by F .5. #218.70.
5. Changes to Scope of Work and Payment. Licensee and Tidemark agree that no
changes to the scope of services and products described on Exhibit A are effective unless and
until a written change order has been executed by both Licensee and Tidemark, which change
order states the deletion. addition or other modification to the scope of work, the adjustment to
the Estimated Total for Products and Services. and the adjustment, if any, to the schedule for
completion of the work. In the event that Licensee requests modifications or additions to the work.
perfonned in a particular phase after Licensee has authorized Tidemark to proceed to a
subsequent phase, such modifications or additions shall be deemed a change in the scope of
work. The party desiring a change to the scope of work shall submit a written request to the other
party containing the description of the item or items to be changed and the proposed adjustment
in the compensation therefore. The parties acknowledge that presently unanticipated custom
modifications to the products or services being provided under this agreement may be requested
by licensee. In such event. Licensee shall submit a change order request for Tidemark's
consideration pursuant to this paragraph.
6. Time of Perfonnance. Tidemark shall substantially complete its perfonnance under this
Agreement by 365 calendar days from the date of this Agreement. Attached as Exhibit A is a
schedule of anticipated dates for completion of each of the phases of the services to be provided
under this Agreement. Such schedule is provided for the sole purpose of allowing the parties to
detennine from time to time whether work is progressing at a rate which is adequate to meet the
scheduled completion date. In the event that Tidemark's performance is delayed or hindered for
any reason by Licensee. a reasonable extension of the substantial completion date shall be
granted by Licensee.
T. Proprietary Inronnation; License Agreement. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that
the PERMIT*PLAN software and all manuals, documents and other supporting materials are the
proprietary copyrighted property of Tidemark, and that Tidemark shall at all times retain
ownership in and all rights to the software and related documentation.
The Licensee agrees not to permit the PERMIT*PLAN software manuals or supporting materials
to be copied, in whole or in part, except as explicitly permitted in this agreement. Tidemark
agrees to allow licensee to copy manuals and supporting materials for Licensee's own use,
provided said copies contain Tidemark's copyright notice. If Licensee makes changes to manuals
or supporting materials before copying and distribution, copies must stili contain Tidemark's
copyright notice. licensee agrees not to release. disclose, sell. give or otherwise make available
the software or any proprietary infonnatlon contained in the software or materials supplied by
2
Tidemark to any third person, entity or municipality. In the event of any unauthorized
reproouctlon of the PERMIT*PLAN software or related materials which occurs while the software
or materials subject to this agreement are In the possession of Licensee, Tidemark may
terminate this agreement and/or the license granted hereunder. and Tidemark shall have all
reme<lles available at law or In equity for Injunctive relief and/or the recovery of damages.
In the event this agreement Is tennlnated according to the tenns in paragraph 13 of this
agreement. and Licensee Is the defaulting party, all software installed pursuant to this agreement
and all supporting materials delivered shall be Immediately returned to Tidemark. If Tidemark is
the defaulting party, Licensee shall retain the right to possess. use. and modify the software
delivered before the date of termination, under the terms of this license agreement.
Tidemark grants to Licensee, as part of this agreement and subject to Its terms, a non-exclusive
license to utilize the PERMIT*PLAN CS software Installed pursuant to this agreement on one
host, file server, or database server at Licensee's principal office for production use and to Install
one copy of the PERMIT*PLAN CS software on one or more separate hosts. file servers, or
database selVers for system development and testing.
Tidemark also grants to Licensee, as part of this agreement and subject to its terms, the right to
possess source code for PERMIT*PLAN CS and to modify said software for Licensee's own use.
8. Authorized Contact and Decision Making Persons. Licensee and Tidemark agree to
designate individuals within their respective organizations who have the primary responsibility
and authority for: a) contacts with the other party (project coordinator); and b} the supervision
and administration of this agreement and to execute changes to this agreement.
Until substitute Individuals are designated in writing by licensee or Tidemark, the following
individuals are designated in writing by licensee or Tidemark, the following individuals are
designated and the parties may rely upon these persons for all matters pertaining to this
agreement.
TIDEMARK:
a. Jane M. Glass is designated the primary contact person.
b. Andrew A. Ruotsala and Jane M. Glass have authority to change this agreement.
LICENSEE:
Victor C. Chodora, Assistant DiTector
CenEral Perm1tt1n~ designated the project coordinator.
a.
b. City Manager has limited authority to change this agreement, otherwise City Commission
must approve of all other modifications.
9. Notices. All notices required or authorized by this agreement shall be in writing and
hand-delivered or mailed to the addresses shown below:
TIDEMARK:
Suite 290
2815 Second Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98121
LICENSEE:
City Attomey's Office
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
3
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
10. Limited Warranty; Limitation of Liability.
A. Limitation of Warranty \ Tidemark's products and services are provided on an
"as-is" basis, and except as provided expressly In this paragraph, Tidemark makes no warranty
of any kind, express or Implied, including without limitation any warranty of merchantability or
fitness for particular purpose.
B. Third-Party Products. Tidemark shall not In any manner be responsible for
software or programs manufactured by vendors other than Tidemark.
C. Limitation of L1abilitv. Licensee agrees that Tidemark's liability for any breach of
this agreement, regardless of the form of action, claim or procedure, shall be limited to a claim
for money damages not exceeding the total amount actually paid by Licensee to Tidemark for
the products and services Tidemark is obligated to provide under this agreement. In no event
shall Tidemark be liable for any consequential. indirect or special damages, resulting from or
related to any failure of the products or services provided by Tidemark, Including without
limitation. loss of data or delay in the delivery of permits.
D. Limited Warranty. The PERMIT*PLAN software programs, the instruction
manuals, and reference materials delivered to the Licensee are warranted against defect in
materials and workmanship for a period of six (6) months from the date of completion of this
agreement by Tidemark. During this six (6) month period. Tidemark will remedy defects in the
software. manuals and reference materials without charge within a reasonable length of time
following Tidemark's receipt of a problem report sheet.
To obtain warranty service. Licensee must submit a written problem report sheet to Tidemark on
forms provided by Tidemark.
This warranty shall be null and void if any changes are made by the Licensee or its agents to any
of the standard tables or system utilities not accessible from the PERMIT*PLAN utilities menu.
This warranty shall not apply to any materials which have been altered or repaired by anyone
other than Tidemark. This warranty shall not apply to any materials subject to misuse no to any
materials which are not operated in accordance with the printed Instructions of Tidemark.
E. Bevond Warranty Period Maintenance Ootion. Following the six month warranty
period. updates of the programs and maintenance of the PERMIT*PLAN system will be available
from Tidemark only pursuant to the PERMIT*PLAN Software Maintenance Policy. Licensee shall
have the option of subscribing to the PERMIT''PLAN Software Maintenance Policy by paying the
maintenance fee as specified In Exhibit B. The version of the PERMIT*PLAN Software
Maintenance Policy current as of the time of this agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit D and
incorporated herein by this reference. Tidemark agrees not to increase the percentage of Total
Installed Price, upon which the maintenance fee is based, for a period of two years after
completion of this agreement.
11. Subcontracts. Licensee acknowledges that Tidemark may provide some of the products
or services required by this agreement by hiring subcontractors.
12. Completion of Contract; Acceptance Procedures. When Tidemark has completed its
perfonnance under this agreement. it shall submit a Notice of Completion to Licensee. Licensee
shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of the Notice of Completion to Inspect the Installed
software system, and if not in compliance with this agreement, reject the system In writing.
licensee shall not unreasonably reject the system. During the 30.day Inspection period,
4
TidemarK shall assist Licensee in reviewing and testing the software system to verify its
compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. At the end of the 30-day Inspedion
period, if Licensee has not delivered In writing to Tidemark a Notice of Rejection outlining the
specific deficiencies in the system, the system shall be deemed complete and accepted by the
Licensee. After acceptance, the licensee shall make the flnal payment due under this
agreement, Including the payment of all retainage.
13. Temlnation. This agreement may only be terminated upon the material breach of the
provisions of this agreement by either party in accordance with this paragraph. In the event of
material breach by one party, the non-defaulting party desiring to terminate the agreement shall
give ten (10) days written notice of tennination to the defauttlng party and provide the defaulting
party with the opportunity to consutt with the non-defaulting party and cure the default. prior to
termination. If the non-defaultlng party does not withdraw its notice of termination, this
agreement shall be deemed terminated ten days after the notice of termination. If the Licensee
terminates Tidemar1< for Tidemark's breach, Tidemark shall be entitled to the compensation
eamed through the date of tennination.
14. Non-Waiver. The failure of either party to object to a breach of this agreement shall not
prevent that party from thereafter objecting to that breach or any other breach of this agreement.
15. Attorney-s Fees_ In the event of litigation to resolve a dispute arising under this
agreement, the substantially prevailing party In such arbitration or litigation shall be entitled to all
litigation expenses, actual attorneys' fees and costs, and all such expenses Incurred in any
appellate action.
16. Venue; Governing Law. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Florida. The venue of any action under this agreement shall be Pinellas County, Florida.
17. Entire Agreement. This agreement. together with the exhibits incorporated herein,
represents the entire understanding between Licensee and Tidemark and supersedes all prior
agreements whether written or oral. This agreement may only be amended, supplemented, or
modified by a writing executed by both Licerlsee and Tidemark.
18. Sale or Acquisition. If Tidemark is sold or otherwise acquired by another entity, then
all rights and obligations under this agreement shall survive such sale or acquisition unless
licensee consents to any changes In writing.
TIDEMARK:
Dale Slgned:#
5
f-,';l ..
LICENSEE:
Countersigned:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
By:
Elizabeth M. Deptula
City Manager
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Attest:
~~ ---
John Carassas
Assistant City Attorney
,
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
,
,
!
i
I
i
!
l
j
i
I
i
i
!
!
,'.
6
Exhibit A
Scope of Work and Products:
Tidemark Computer Systems, Inc. has been chosen to provide PERMIT*PLAN CS permit
management software, along with maintenance, training and other services specified below.
Tidemark will provide a software license agreement and install the PERMIT*PLAN CSt
configured to use ORACLE's relational database management system, on Licensee's
cllenVserver hardware archltedure.
The City will run PERMIT*PLAN CS under Windows95. As of the date of this agreement,
PowerBuilder version 4, the latest release of PowerBuilder, Is stated by PowerSoft to be
.compatible- with Windows95 but not -compllane. PowerBuilder version 5 Is stated by PowerSoft
to be .compliant- with Wlndows95. PERMI,..PLAN es' compatibility and compliance with
Windows95 Is dependent on that of PowerBullder. TidemarK will Implement PERMIT*PLAN CS
at the City with PowerBuilder version 5, unless It Is not available, In which case Tidemark will
implement PERMIT.PLAN CS with PowerBuilder version 4. Should an Incompatibility problem
arise between PowerBuilder version 4 and Windows95 which affects PERMIT*PLAN CSt
Tidemark will work with the City to resolve the incompatibility or will provide a work around.
Should the incompatibility problem be so severe that it can only be resolved by Installing version
5 of PowerBuilder, and version 5 has not been released by PowerSoft, Tidemark will agree to a
slide In the schedule until such time as version 5 of PowerBuilder is available, at no penalty to
the City.
Upon receiving a copy of the fully executed contract, Tidemark will deliver to the City, on
diskette, a copy of the source code for the customer-specific part of the software, including: all
PowerBuilder dynamic libraries (PERMIT*PLAN .PBD files), and customer specific .PBL files
(TPC*.PBL files), and a copy of the source code for the core PERMIT*PLAN es.
Tidemark will provide installation and configuration assistance to produce the case types, and
f()nns specified in Exhibit 8, Estimated Cost Summary and Payment Terms. Tidemark estimates
this work will require 400 hours. This number of hours is expected to be sufficient to produce the
number of custom case types, and fonns as listed. However, in the event more customizatlon
time is required. Tidemark and the City will execute a change order per Paragraph 5 of the
Contract.
Tidemark will deliver and install the PERMIT*PLAN CS 8ase System on the City's hardware.
Tidemark will perform a systems analysis of the City's needs to determine exactly which permit
types are required and what data will be collected and stored by the system. Tidemark will use
the information from a series of structured interviews in determining how PERMIT*PLAN is to be
customized for the City. Up to four (4) drafts and one (1) final copy of a design document,
e<>nsisting of entity-relationship diagrams, data dictionary, case screens designs will be
produced. Tidemark will also determine the structure of the fees related to each permit type.
Tidemark will produce up to two (2) drafts and one (1) final copy of the designs for the custom
forms. These forms will be produced using PowerBuilder Report Writer software.
Tidemark will Install the configured system produced from the design document, set up the Initial
ac::tions library which defines the process to be followed In managing each permit type, and set
up the fee and valuation tables. City staff will be Instructed how to enter conditions into the
PERMIT*PLAN database so that they may be attached to appropriate cases.
7
Tidemark will review the parcel data file format and develop a prO{Jram to convert and import
those data to the PERMIT*PLAN database. Tidemark will develop a program to convert and
Import historical license data, supplied as one ASCII file, to the PERMIT*PLAN database.
Tidemark will provide basic user training for a maximum of thirty (30) users. Basic user training
will consist of one all-day session (6 hours) in a class of no more than 10 students.
Tidemark will provide two (2) additional days (6 hours each) of System Utility training to a
maximum of six (6) City staff.
The following system documentation shall be provided by Tidemark:
1) 30 copies of the PERMIT*PlAN Basic User Guide and class workbook.
2) 30 copies of PERMIT*PLAN Quick Reference Guide
3)' 6 copies of the PERMIT*PLAN System Utilities Manual
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND SCHEDULE
The customizing and installation of PERMIT*PLAN will take place according to the estimated
schedule shown below. Since this project Involves the Interaction of a number of individuals on
the staff at the City and at Tidemark, the dates given below may change as the project proceeds.
The column titled "Responsible Party" shows those tasks in which City staff will either be
involved or for which they will be entirely responsible. Most tasks assigned to the City are
reviews, data gathering, and testing. Your staff will, of course, be expected to attend training
classes. We have tried to explain each task so that the extent of City staff involvement can be
determined.
Task
1
Descri tion
5i n contract
Tidemark delivers copy of Base System with
Source Code on disk upon receipt of fully
executed contract.(as described in Scope of
Work
Mobilization time
Responsible
Pa
TCS & C'
Working Days
From Start of
Work
Da 0
2
TCS & City
Until July 31,
1996.
Schedule appointments for user Interviews.
Cit moves to new buildin .
3 Install Base S stem
Tidemark Installs the Base on the City's
hardware. Cil staff assists as neooed.
CONFIGURATION BEGINS:
4
Initial User Interviews
Begin systems analysis and screen design.
Tidemark systems analyst meets with small
groups of City staff to define what data should
go on input screens. Each group will meet for
1-3 hours.
TCS & Ci
8
. Working Days
Responsible From Start of
Task Description Partv Contract
5 Draft #1, Design Document TeS Davs !-25
Develop draft design document (entity
relationship diagrams, data dictionary, screen
designs) based on the Initial user Interviews.
Tidemark delivers document to City.
6 Review Draft #1. Deslan Document City Days 26-45,
Tidemark instructs City staff how to review the Site visit #2
design document. City reviews, corrects and
changes the draft design dowment as
needed. Retum marked up copy to Tidemark.
7 Draft #2, Deslan Document TeS Davs 46-65
Tidemark modifies design document per City's
reQuests and delivers document to City.
8 Review Draft #2, Desian Document City Davs 56-65
Review, correct and change the draft design
document as needed. Return marked up copy
to Tidemark.
9 Draft #3, Design Document res Days 66-75
Tidemark modifies design document per City's Site visit #3
reouests and delivers document to City.
10 Review Draft #3, Desian Document Citv Davs 76-85
Review, correct and change the draft design
document as needed. Retum marked up copy
to Tidemark.
11 Draft #4, Design Document TCS Davs 86-95
Tidemark modifies design document per City's
reauests and delivers document to City.
12 Review Draft #4, Design Document City Days 86-105
Review, correct and change the draft design
document as needed. Retum marked up copy
to Tidemark.
13 Final Design Document TCS Days 106-110
Make final changes to design document and
deliver to City.
14 Sign-off for Design Document City Day 111
City signs acceptance form and returns it to
Tidemark.
15 Configuration of database TCS Days 111-120
Tidemart sets up City's unique tables and
InDut screens.
16 Installation of Configured System TCS Day 121
Tidemark delivers the configured database Site visit #4,
and inDut screens. 2 TCS staff
17 Actions Library rcs & City Day 121-125
Tidemark sets up Initial actions library and Site visit #4,
shows City staff (team leaders) how to add, 2 rcs staff
update, and delete actions 10 PERMIT*PLAN.
9
Working Days
Responsible From Start of
Task Description Party Contract
18 Develop and Load Conditions TCS & CitY Day 126+
Tldemar1t Instructs one or two City staff how to Site visit #4
develop and load conditions into
PERMIT*PLAN. Instruction takes about an
hour. Actually developing the conditions on a
word processor so that they can be loaded into
the database may take a staff member several
days. The loading Itself requires an hour or
more, depending on how many conditions
there are.
19 Fee and Valuation Tables TeS & City Day 126-142
Tidemar1t sets up fee tables at City, based on Begin during site
fee schedules obtained during analysis visit #4
meetings. Advice of some 51aff members will
be needed from time to time during these two
days.
20 Convert Parcel Data TeS Days 143-164
Tldemar1t develops program to convert and
load Assessor's parcel data into
PERMIT*PLAN database. Tidemark delivers
the program to City.
21 Draft Forms Templates Tes Days 111-130
Tidemar1t uses information gathered during
analysis te develop first copies of fonns.
Delivers fonns to Citv.
22 ReviewlModifv Fonns Tes & eity Days 131-150
City reviews drafts forms and requests Site vis" #5
corrections and changes. Tidemark makes
changes and sends to City. There is time
allowed here for two iterations of
review/moditv .
23 Final Forms TeS Days 151-164
Tidemark makes final changes to fonns and
delivers to Citv.
24 Signoff on Forms City Day 164
Cil\, siems acceptance for forms.
25 Install CASHIER Module Tes & City Day 165
Tidemar1t installs CASHIER module on City's Site visit #6
hardware
26 CASHIER Module Training TeS & City Day 165
Tidemark trains cashier(s) in how to use the Site visit #6
CASHIER module.lone half day needed)
27 Training and Documentation Tes & City Days 168-174
Tidemark perfonns training as specified in the Site visit #7
Scope of Wor1t.
28 System Startup Tes & City Days 175-179
PERMIT*PLAN goes on-line at City. Tidemar1t Site visit #8
software engineer on-site. System
administrators and team leaders will be
involved. 8S will new users of PERMIT*PLAN.
10
Task
29
30
31
~;.
1'.
f
~J:
.~:. '
~~
.,.
"
".
.r;.,
',' :'
11
Ci
, ,p.' 't
Working Days
From Start of
Contract
Da s 180-199
Da 200
Da 200
Exhibit B
Tenns of payment:
Payment of the license fee (less 10% retainage) shall be due upon signing the Contract for
Software Program and Consultant Services. Thereafter, at the beginning of each month,
Tidemark will invoice the City for the number of hours worked the previous month (less 10%
retainage), for any items delivered the previous month and charged by flat fee (less 10%), and
for actual travel expenses (no retalnage), If any, Incurred the previous month. Upon final system
acceptance from the City, Tldemati( will Invoice the City for the retalnage. The City is
responsible for all federal, state and local sales, excise, and use taxes.
Estimated Cost Summary:
t Item
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Cost Component
PERMIT*PLAN CS software license for one server.
Source code
Number of workstations (unlimited)
Amount I
$25,000.00
Included
Included
Maint.
*
PERMIT*PLAN CASHIER module, 1 copy
*
$3,250.00
Cost Component:
NOTE: The following costs are estimates.
Estimated
Amount
Installation and configuration assistance, including the
following deliverables:
. Development of design document (4 drafts & 1 final),
and Initial loading of PERMIT*PLAN library files for up
to 15 case types.
. Design and installation of your choice of up to 15 pages
of custom fooos.
. 6 site visits of up to 25 person-cJays total to perfonn
systems ar.dlysls and installation, and to provide on-site
. startup assistance when your system goes on line.
Estimated at:
40 hours of consulting @ $125.00
192 hours of analysis & design @ $95.00
128 hours of programming @ $75.00
40 hours of project management @ $75.00
*
$5,000.00
$18,240.00
$9,600.00
$3,000.00
$2,250.00
*
*
Program to convert and import Assesso~s property data,
supplied as one ASCII or RDSMS file, est. 30 hrs @ $75.00
*
Training:
Five (5) totar days of on-site training @ $aDO/day, Including
. Three days of Basic User training (up to 10 people per
class, 30 users total)
. Two days of System Utilities training (up to 6 students)
. Each Basic User attending training will receive a Basic
User Guide, Training Workbook, and Quick Reference
Guide. Each student attending System Utilities training
will receive 8 System Utilities Manual and set of Tech
Notes In addition.
$4,000.00
12
8.
Six-month e>dended warranty.
$3,800.40
Estimated travel costs. (2)
$74,140.40
$12,073 -
$20.218
$7.600.80
ESTIMATED TOTAL FOR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Software Maintenance for 1 year after warranty period.
Assumes Total Installed Software Cost of $63,340. (1)
Optional products and services:
Conversion modules and Interfaces will be developed at
Tidemark's current hourly rates.
Hourly rates for Tidemark services:
Consulting
Systems analysis and design
Programming
$125
$95
$75
NOTES:
(1)
Maintenance after the warranty period shall be governed by the Software Maintenance
Polley attached as Exhibit o.
(2) The travel cost estimates above are based on the following assumptions:
9 round-trip airfares from Seattle to
Tampa @ $1.352 for full coach. fully
refundable, fare. (Tidemark
endeavors to obtain cheaper fares
where possible. Current lowest fare is
$447)
$4,023 -
$12,168
46 days lodging, rental car. and
meals for technical staff @ $17S/day
$8,050
Total estimated travel costs
$12.073 -
$20,218
13
Exhibit C
LIST OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY
The City shall be responsible for the purchase, maintenance, and support of all PC and networK
hardware and software. PC and network hardware and software will conform to the following
minimum requirements:
HARDWARE and SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
CLIENT EN\{IRONMENT. Each client shall be running Microsoft Windows 95 as the client
(front-end) operating environment. Machines must be 100% IBM compatible PC's with 60 MHz
Pentium, P6 or faster processor and 16 Mb of RAM and SVGA graphics. Machines must have a
hard disk with 20 meg of space available for PERMIT*PLAN CS software), a 3.5- floppy diskette
drive, a network Interface card, DOS 6.00 or higher. Sufficient RAM is probably the single most
Important factor affecting performance.
Note: As a minimum, a 33 MHz 4860X with 12 meg of RAM and VGA graphics may be used for
occasional lookups and light data entry, but not for production data entry of permit cases, forms
printing, or reporting. SX processors are not recommended.
DATABASE SERVER. City shall maintain, on its premises, a computer dedicated for use as a
database server. Server will be a Digital Equipment Corporation AXP 2000 4/233 single
processor, 128 Mb of memory; and 10GB RAID 5 disk, or better. This server will run the AXP
NT operating system, on a TCPIIP network, using the Oracle database. This server configuration
has been reviewed by Tidemark prior to purchase, and is stated, by Tidemark, to be able to
provided services for a 25 concurrent user network. The City shall acquire copies of
PowerBuilder and the ROBMS for its own hardware and network. The City shall be responsible
for providing hardware and database updates as the installed user base grows.
NETWORK. City shall install a TCPIIPIWindows NT network, with Windows95 on the client
workstations.
ROBMS. The City shall acquire Its own licenses for Oracle for the appropriate number of
concurrent users. Note that ORACLE's RAM requirements are in addition to those of
PERMIT*PLAN CS.
MODEM, REMOTE COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE, AND DIAL-UP LINE.
One PC on the network shall be equipped with a minimum 14.4 MBPS, Hayes-compatible
modem, PC Anywhere for Windows remote communications software (current release when
purchased), and a voice-grade telephone line for remote support and service.
PRINTERS.
Laser Printers. HP LaserJet Series II, liP, liD, III, IIIP, 11I0, IV, HP DeskJet, and other laser
printers that are 100% HP compatible.
Dot Matrix Printers. Most 9-pin -and 24-pin dot matrix impact printers equipped with a tractor
feeder, including dot matrix printers from IBM, Epson, Okidata, Panasonic, Citizen,
Mannesmann Tally, and others. The tractor feeder should be a "push" tractor that feeds the
paper before the roller.
HARD DISK BACKUP. A cartridge tape backup unit Is strongly recommended to make daily
backups of all files In the PERMIT*PLAN home directory and its sub-directories.
14
. , , '. "
, ? -' " , I "~
UN INTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS). A UPS large enough to run the file server is
strongly recommended to help protect your programs from power failures, black-outs, and brown-
outs.
HARDWARE FOR INSPECTOR MODULE. The City shall provide one MS-DOS based
computer suitable for use in the field for each Inspector, and one connectivity pack for each four
Inspector machines.
HARDWARE FOR CASHIER MODULE. The City shall provide one dedicated PC conforming to
the specifications above for each user of the CASHIER module.
~
!:,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
15
Exhibit 0
Tidemark Software
Maintenance Policy
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Effective March l~ 1996, Tidemark will offer the following support options for Tidemark products. These
options will become available to customers on their next support anniversary after March 1, 1996. Table
I below shows the options available for the various Tidemark families of products.
Table 1
Available Support Options
PERMIT.PLAN DOS LAN version. includin ST
PERMIT.PLAN CS version
PERMIT.PLAN Oracle Forms version
Not available
Not available
Table 2 below lists the items included in the Eoonomy and Standard Support options.
Table 2
Items Included in Support Options
Telephone support for the Tidemark software" during normal
business hours (8 am - S pm Pacific Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays). Includes dial-up seIVice to customer's system
tluough modem and phone line, which must be made available by
the customer.
After-hours emergency telephone support (evenings, weekends and
holidays) for tIte Tidemark software
On.site support as deemed necessary by Tidemark
Corrections to the Tidemark software or documentation when the
software does not perform as documented.
Periodic enhancements to the customer's current Tidemark software
Updated documentation to reflect periodic software enhancements.
Maintainin a test version of our stem in our office
Available source code escrow agreement
16
$195.00 per incident
(up to 3 total hours)
See Tenus and
Conditions # 1.
Included
$390.00 per incident
(up to 3 total hours)
See Tenus and
Conditions # 1
See Tenus and
Conditions # 2
$195.00 per incident
(up to 3 total hours)
See Terms and
Conditions # 1.
See Terms and
Conditions # 2
See Terms and
Conditions # 2
Not included
Not available
Included
Included
Included
Included
Included
Included
Available by
executing
Tidemark's standard
escrow a reement
.' 'I ~ .....:, ,'J.'. I '. / , ~.... - .--
~ ::: :~~~ ~~~~t~1?~}\~:~; ~ :::;:;~ .~;;~~;~i~;~:;:Wi :~: ;~: ~ ~~;;:~;~~:~~:}j~: ~}:: ;~~~:/ :;~ ;(~~: DeaCri . ,... '..::
Subscription to Tidemark Exchange for sharing templates for case
screens. forms re Its and batches.
.... S ';.;.;.i"'d' 's" ..........rt:....:....
":(: tall\lar ., u""" . ":=:{
Included
Services which are outside the scope of this support policy include. but are not limited to, the items listed
in Table 3 below:
Table 3
Excluded Sernces
1.
[~mt~l~~~m@~
2.
3.
4.
Changes to software requested by the customer (But such services may be provided at Tidemark's normal
rates .
Trainin of customer's rsonnel ut such services ma be rovided at Tidemark's nonnal rates.
Assistance in restorin dama ed software or data.
Assistance with hardware or with software not licensed b Tidemark.
In order to provide effective support in a timely manner. the customer must be responsible for the items
listed in Table 4.
Table 4
Responsibilities of Customers
1.
;..,..:.....;....:.:.:.;.....;,.
..... .........
:::.:::~:~:::~::::::::::::::::
........................'......
:::~*lli1::~:~~~~~1
2.
~mml]f~ffi~Ii~
3.
~~~t~~~~ti}~j
4.
t~~~t~~~~!~~~~~~t:
II
5.
~J~~@1~;~mf~~1
,.... .,.., .",
6.
~m~~1111~ltf~~
The customer shall provide a dial-up modem port to the system, for maintenance access by Tidemark
personnel. Such port shall be equipped with a minimum 9,600 BPS modem, and be available 24 hours a
da , seven da s a week.
The customer shall subscribe to maintenance for the RDBMS and any front end tools required to run
PERMIT. PLAN.
The customer shall be rb1X>nsible for making corrections to any program modules added or modified by
customer when the software does not rfonn as documented.
The customer shall be responsible for installing and integrating enhancements provided by TIDEMARK,
where such enhancements affect modules that have been added or modified by the customer. TIDEMARK
can not guarantee compatibility between enhancements provided by TIDEMARK and program additions
and modifications done the customer.
The customer shall be responsible for performing daily backups of all PERMIT*PLAN and RDBMS
stem and data files.
The customer shall be responsible for operating and maintaining a suitable Uninterruptible Power Supply
S on an host or server containin the PERMIT*PLAN ro ram and data files.
Terms and Conditions:
1. Payment for Economy Support on a per incident basis must be made by either Mastercard or Visa.
Credit card charges must receive bank authorization by phone prior to beginning work. In the event
the requested support will take more than three hours, Tidemark will prepare an estimate of the
required scope of work and cost. Work over and above the three hour limit per incident will require a
change order authorized in advance by the customer.
2. Under Economy Support, all requests for on-site service, product changes, enhancements, training,
and other services .must be authorized by the customer in advance by a written change order detailing
the scope of work, costs, and payment involved for the requested work.
3. Standard Su port provided under this policy shall be provided to the customer for a period of one year
upon receipt f the annual maintenance fee by Tidemark. Tidemark will invoice the customer each
year, on or ore the customer's anniversary date, for the following year's maintenance, The cost of
Standard Su port is twelve percent (12%) of the Total Installed Price of Tidemark's software, plus
any applicab e sales taxes, excise taxes, and duties.
4.
at either party brings a lawsuit to enforce this policy, the prevailing party shall be
costs and attorney's fees. The laws of the State of Florida shall govern in such a case.
Copyright C> 19 by Tidemark Computer Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Tidemark Computer
Systems, Inc. 28 5 Second Avenue, Suite 290 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 728.8744 FAX (206) 728-
1179. SUPPO . DOC.
...
~'
'i,
. ..., .~ . --.-- ~..~-.---_. It"-. --_...-# ~ - ~~.'-~ . . ! :
an
~
r---
=
,....
o
~
==
o
~
~
u
z
o
fl)
~
o
u
r-I >., .c .c
~r-I r-fLCl.u.u U
r-I . r-I ~ N 0 -.-I .r-! .
rn OJ 3 o d ~~ .c Q)
~ .w Ul . rn $...l 0 ~rn rn
So-l Q) .. . ~ (lJ ~'O 0 en tn :>.. ~ Id
~ r-f "d Q) 0 r-l O~lJ-lHQ'd.u ..0 ,Q
~(lJN "d ..Q 'Om '.-1 Q on Ul"d
(lJ S ~-M d 'r-! ~ Q) ~illCJ ~-~ rn
p:: o 0 e -n . X 'r-! -t1l .Q)~ . ~
U r-! 0 . ~'d<lJ . ~'OQOlQ)W~ ~~"d . 0
Q).lJ (!) Q)r-l Q) Q)Q)~~ OJ tn OJ Q) '0
.u :> Ul Q .uUl~ d WUltJ(lJ Q),..q o (lJ en d d
o Q) ::s 0 OroS::: 0 o m -M rn Q.c:.u H $...l rn 0 -r-f
Z'd U Z Z,QH Z Z .0 r-l ~ -r-f W 0 ~rd.o Z ~
<V
OJtJ Ul m rn Ul
'd~ 0 0 0
o 0 Q) Z (lJ Z Q) Z Q)
u~ >t ~ ~ ~
s:::
~
tn
Q01
-M ~ Ul rn rn rn
Q'r-! OJ 0 <lJ 0 Q) 0 (lJ
Q~ ~ Z ~ Z ~ Z ~
IdO
r-flSl
~
Q)
Ul
Q 01 rn 01 01 Ul 0 Ol
Q) (lJ OJ OJ Q) Q) Z ill
U ~ ~ ~ ~ >t ~
-.1
..:I ;
. ,
. -.
.
.m .
.u
-.1 rn Ol Ul 0 en m m
e (lJ ill Q) Z <1.1 Q) QJ
>t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
<1.1
01
JJ
tJ
(lJ 01 0 Ul 0 01 en en
~ aJ Z Q) Z (lJ Q) Q)
rn ~ >t ~ ~ ~
s:::
H
Q) Q) 0 0 o ~ O$...l.JJ Or-l$.!
.us::: .us::: 0 om 0<1.1 0Q)r-l OQ)<1.I
..JJ 00) O(lJ om m:> \!):>~ o :> ~
wm &.~ &.~ ...~ \O~ .. d
Ol 0 Or-! -r-! .. Q d ..roo
rxlU U)~ M~ coO 0'\00 .qc $...l U
001 001 rl ["- LClU NUtJ row
Z Z .{/}- .(J)- {I}+ .(J)- + + {/}- + ~
Q) U
S 0
ro Ul u
Z Ul d .u
~ H tJ Q
>. ".1 Q)
Q ~ ... 'r-! r-! S ..!(
ItS .u .w .0 0l0-4 $.!
~ d H s:l ~ 14 ItS S 0 ~
0 I 0 PI 0 ~ 0),.,
0 .u 04 u u ~ J..J Q) OJ
U $.! e So-! 8 u Q) 01 :> 'tj
::s 0 (lJ U Q) 'r-! >,Q) 'r-!
CO CJ Pol UlCll U) UlQ E-i
~
u
e
ffi
e
t-
o
oJ
lQ
~
-(
9
.:.i
\ . .,
. I . oJ .
> " " , . " . ' , : . ':. ,: ',,'
. . ,...' . ~---'-~~----------
. ------~~_..._~_......----.-----~~
c.- (J 5
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
/7
c::::""
J. ~.q0
SUBJECT:
Land Development Code amendment defining "public safety facility," identifying zones where public
safety facilities may be allowed, and providing standards for aflproval. (LDCA 96-11)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION:
Receive proposed code amendment and refer to City Clerk for advertisement for public hearing.
[J and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
This ordinance was prepared to address issues identified by the Pinellas Planning Council staff upon
review of recently adopted City Ordinance No. 5971-96 revising the definition of "utility facility" to
include police substations.
The attached ordinance:
~ Provides a definition of "public safety facilityll which broadly includes police substations and other
similar uses.
~ Identifies public safety facilities as a permitted use in the Urban Center Core, Urban Center Eastern
Corridor, and Public/Semipublic districts. It further identifies public safety facilities as a conditional use
in residential, office, commercial and industrial districts, and provides standards for approval.
~ Specifies the applicability of area thresholds set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as Amended.
BOARD ACTION DATE
CITY COMMISSION RECEIPT & REFERRAL MAY 2, 1996
PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDA TION JUNE 4, 1996
CITY COMMISSION FIRST READING JUNE 20, 1 996
CITY COMMISSION SECOND READING JULY 18, 1996
Total
Commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Denied
o Continued to:
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
LD-S
N/A
N/A
N/A
~tr':""
Originating Dept:
CENTRAL P TTING
Costs: $ N/A
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
/--'~
I J,(;-
\
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
t8) Not Required
Affect~ Parties
o Not; fied
l5i1 Not Rcqui red
f~in9 Source:
o Capi tal Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Attachments:
DRAFT ORD I NANCE
subni ttcd by:
City Manuger
o None
Appropriation Code:
.".
,. Printed on recycled pnper
ORQI~ANCE NO..-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE; AMENDING SECTIONS 35.11, 40.034,40.035,40.043,
40.044, 40.064, 40.065, 40.084, 40.085, 40.104, 40.105, 40.124,
40.125,40.134,40.135,40.144,40.145,40.164, 40.165, 40.184,
40.185, 40.204, 40.205, 40.224, 40.225, 40.243.1, 40.244,
40.266, 40.284, 40.285, 40.304, 40.305, 40.324, 40.325, 40.344,
40.345, 40.365, 40.366, 40.384, 40.385, 40.404, 40.405, 40.424,
40.425, 40.434, 40.435, 40.444, 40.445, 40.464, 40.465, 40.474,
40.475, 40.484, 40.485, 40.504, 40.505, 40.524, 40.525, 40.543,
40.545, and 41.053, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO DEFINE
"PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY," TO DELETE POLICE
SUBSTATIONS FROM THE DEFINITION OF "UTILITY
FACILITY" AND TO DELETE LANGUAGE CONCERNING
POLICE SUESTATIONS FROM THE SUPPLEMENTARY
STANDARDS FOR UTILITY FACILITY CONDITIONAL
USES, TO ALLOW PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES AS A
PERMITTED USE IN THE CORE AND EASTERN CORRIDOR
SUBDISTRICTS OF THE URBAN CENTER DISTRICT AND
IN THE PUBLIC/SEMIPUBLIC DISTRICT, TO ALLOW
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN
ALL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, THE LIMITED OFFICE
DISTRICT, GENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT, NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, NORTH GREENWOOD
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, BEACH COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, RESORT COMMERCIAL 24 AND 28 DISTRICTS,
GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, INFILL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICT,
DOWNTOWN/MIXED USE DISTRICT, BAYFRONT AND
TRANSITIONAL SUBDISTRICTS OF THE URBAN CENTER
DISTRICT, LIMITED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND OFFICE PARK
DISTRICT, AND TO IDENTIFY STANDARDS FOR
APPROVAL FOR PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES IN THE
AFOREMENTIONED DISTRICTS WHERE ALLOWED AS A
CONDITIONAL USE, TO SPECIFY THE APPLICABILITY OF
THE AREA THRESHOLDS SET FORTH IN THE RULES
CONCERNING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE
COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AS AMENDED;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF HE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Sections 35.11, 40.034, 40.035, 40.043, 40.044, 4O.~, 40.065, 40.084,
40.085, 40.104, 40.105, 40.124, 40.125, 40.134, 40.135, 40.144, 40.145,' 40.164,
40.165, 40.184, 40.185, 40.204, 40.205, 40.224, 40.225, 40.243. , 40.244, 40.266,
40.284, 40.285, 40.304, 40.305, 40.324, 40.325, 40.344, 40.34 , 40.365, 40.366,
40.384, 40.385, 40.404, 40.405, 40.424, 40.425, 40.434, 40.43 , 40.444, 40.445,
40.464, 40.465, 40.474, 40.475, 40.484, 40.485, 40.504, 40.50 , 40.524, 40.525,
40.543,40.545, and 41.053, Code of Ordinances, are amended to rea:
Sec. 35.11. Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this developm nt code, shall have
the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context cl€:arly indicates a
different meaning:
*
*
*
*
*
medical services. and ancilIaty community outreach activities.
*
*
*
*
*
Utility facility means the use of land, improvements or facilities the n by a public or
private utility, including but not limited to potable water facilities and p~ stations, remote
switching stations, wastewater treatment plants and lift stations, police estatioas, electric
substations, and power generation facilities. This definition does not include transmission and
distribution lines, water or sewer mains, backflow preventers, transformers, t affic signal control
cabinets, and similar equipment not generally considered to be structures.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.034. Conditional uses.
Within Single-Family Residential "One" Districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ORDNANCE NO,
2
a1
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.035. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to single-family residential "one" districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permitted..and conditional uses allowed in this...district shalLbe subject to t~
area _e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywid.eYuture Land Use Plan as Amend~
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.043. Conditional uses.
Within single-family residential 2 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ill
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.044. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to single-family residential 2 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permitted and conditional uses allowed in this district shall be subject to the.
area t~e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
1b.e Countywiduuture Land Use eJan as Amend<<l.
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
3
_____.:_ ._______._____~_._______.~~~-l--~~-:~-.-~~--,-.~---.~
Sec. 40.064. Conditional uses.
Within single-family residential 4 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ill
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.065. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to single-family residential 4 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permitted.Jmd conditional uses allowed in this..1listrict shalLbe subject to ~
area ~d applicable to such uses as set forth in the...RuJes Concerning the Administration of
the Countywide Future Land Use elan as Amended..
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.084. Conditional uses.
Within single-family residential 6 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ill Mlic safety facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.085. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to single-family residential 6 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
4
ill The permitte<Land conditional uses allowed in this district shalLbe subject to the
area _e to such uses as set fQrth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywid~Future Land Use plan as Amend~~
*
*
*
*
*
Sec.40.104. Conditional uses.
Within single-family residential 8 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
(4).
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.105. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to single-family residential 8 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
(4). The permitted and conditional uses allowed...iIUb.is district shalLbtuubject to ~
area _e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
1h.e Countywid~Future Land Use I?lan as Amend~
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.124. Conditional uses.
II.'
Within multiple-family residential 8 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!6l
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.125. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to multiple-family residential 8 districts:
ORDINANCE NO.
5
*
*
*
*
*
!6), The permitte~onditional uses allowed in thi.s....district shalLbe subject to ~
area _e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the CountywiQe...Future Land Use Plan as Amended...
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.134. Conditional uses.
Within Multiple-Family Residential "Ten" Districts, the following uses may be allowed
as conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!61
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.135. Use limitations.
Ih.e...ful.lowing use limitationsJlPl2ly to multiple-family residential 10 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
L6l The permitted.....and conditional uses allowed in tbiulistrict shalL be subject to the
area threshQ~e to such uses as set fm1h in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywiduuture Land Use J>lan as Amenckd.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.144. Conditional uses.
Within multiple-family residential 12 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ill fuhlic safety facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
Sec. 40.145. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to multiple-family residential 12 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
(6), The permitted and conditional uses allowed in this district shalLbe subject to ~
area t~ applicable to such uses as set forth in the Rl.des Concerning the Administration of
the Countywid~ Future Land Use pjan as Amended.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.164. Conditional uses.
Within multiple-family residential 16 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ill
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.165. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to multiple-family residential 16 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permitte<land conditional uses allowed in this district sbalLbe suQject to t~
area ~d app~e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywi~Future Land Use :elan as Amende1L.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.184. Conditional uses.
Within multiple-family residential 20 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
7
ill
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.185. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to multiple-family residential 20 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permittecLand conditional uses allowed in this...district shall...be..mbject to ~
area _e to such uses as set forthJnJhe Rules Concernin~ the Administration of
me Countywiduuture Land Use elan as Amend~
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.204. Conditional uses.
Within multiple-family residential 24 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ill ~1ic safety facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.205. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to multiple-family residential 24 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permitted and conditional uses allowed in this district shall be subject to the
area ~ applicable to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
tll~ Countywide Future Land Use Plan as Amended....
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
8
~._ . _ _ _, _H__-;-_ __ __ . _ - - . , ,
. ,
lie
*
*
lie
*
\"'''''': ' "., ',"
,., .",'
Sec. 4().224. Conditional uses.
Within multiple-family residential 28 districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
ill
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.225. Use limitatiODS.
Tne following use limitations apply to multiple-family residential 28 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permittecl.and conditional uses alloY&l in this district sbalLbe subject to the
area _e to such uses as set fo~es Concerning the Administration of
IDe Countywick.Future Land Use Elan as Amenckd..
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 4{).243.1. Conditional uses.
Within mobile home park districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
*
lie
*
*
*
(2)
Resenled.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.244. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to mobile home park districts:
*
*
*
*
*
'~.
ORDINANCE! NO.
;i,
9
." _', w..' .',."
~~ -,---.-- ~-- -- \. .". I .J
*
*
*
*
*
!41 Ihe permitted and conditional uses a~istrict shalLbe subject to the
area ~ applicable to such uses as set forth in ~es Concerning the Administration of
the Countywid~ Future Land Use Plan as Amended.
Sec. 40.266. Use limitations.
The foIIowin~ use limitations apply to planned development districts:
ill All uses within planned development districts, whether permitted, conditional or
nonconforming, shall be conducted in consonance with the use standards contained in sections
42.22, 42.31, 42.32 and 42.35.
!2l The permitted and conditional uses allowed in this district shall be subject to ~
area _e to suc~ uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
.the Countywide Future Land Use :plan as Amended.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.284. Conditional uses.
Within limited office districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
au
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.285. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to limited office districts:
*
*
*
*
*
U2l The permitted and conditional uses al~is district shalLbe subject to t~
area ~ applicable to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Aclministration of
the Countywide Future Land JJ se Elan as Amend~
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
10
':It'~, '
Sec. 40.304. Conditional uses.
Within general office districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!Q}
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.305. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to general office districts:
*
*
*
*
*
m The permitte<land conditional uses aUowedJn..1b.i.uJistrict shalLbe subject to ~
area _e to such uses as set forth in the...&.ules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywide Future Land Use plan as Amende1l
,"
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.324. Conditional uses.
Within neighborhood commercial districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!l.4l Eublic safety faciljties.
*
*
*
III
*
Sec. 40.325. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to neighborhood commercial districts:
III
*
*
*
*
!lll The permitted and conoitioIllU uses al~istrict shalLbe su~ect to t~
area _e to such uses as set fOtth in tb.e....Ru.les Concerning.,the Administration of
.the Countywide f~ture LamLUse plan as Arnend.ma.
ORDINANCE NO.
11
l,' .
;:,1:".',">""
,. .,..-) ,
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.344. Conditional uses.
Within the North Greenwood commercial district, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!2J
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.345. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to the North Greenwood commercial district:
*
*
*
*
*
!6l The perrnitte<1 and conditional uses allowed in this district shalLbe suQject to ~
area _e to such uses as set fortl1 in the Ryles Concerning the Administration of
the Countywide..Future Land Use elan as Amended..
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.365. Conditiollal uses.
Within beach commercial districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!lID
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.366. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to beach commercial districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
12
, ,,: ' .'. \ , .' ,I, ' "" . " ", '
. ,
, '
ill The permitted and conditional uses a~istrict shalLbe subject to ~
area _e to such uses as set fort1Lin...the..Res Concerning the Administration of
the Countywiduuture Land Use ~an as Amended..
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.384. Conditional uses.
Within resort commercial 24 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
* * * * *
.am or.. ~ ~. I' . ~ ..... .
r UUII\.
* * * * *
Sec. 40.385. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to resort commercial 24 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
!ID The permittecland conditional uses aUowed in this district shalLbe subject to t~
area thresbo~e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywiduuture Land Use Elan as Amend.ed..
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.404. Conditional uses.
Within resort commercial 28 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
*
*
*
*
*
am
T"I. . ...
..
- ....
't~(,111tlP!::
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANce NO.
13
III
Sec. 40.405. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to resort commercial 28 districts:
*
*
*
*
*
!8l The permitted-1U1d conditional uses al~ in this district shalLbe subject to the.
area ~d applkable to such uses as set forth in the Rules ConcerniUI: the AdlJlinistration of
the Countywide..Future Land Use Elan as Amendm..,
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.424. Conditional uses.
Within general commercial districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!l81 Eublic safety facilities.
* * *
*
*
Sec. 40.425. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to general commercial districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permittecland conditional uses allowed in this district s~ect to ~
area _e to such uses as set forth in tbe...Ru.Jes Concerning ~ministration of
the Countywiduuture Land Use eJan as Arnend~
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.434. Conditional uses.
Within Infill Commercial Districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!22l
ORDINANCE NO.
14
. .
. . ,
~ . , . '. ' .
. ' .' , . ~ 1 ~..-. '
~ :",';"'
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.435. Use limitations.
IfuUQllowin~ use limitations apply to infill comrnerciaLdistricts:
*
*
*
*
*
!Bl The pennitted...aml conditional uses allowed in tl)is district sba.ll..J>e subject to t~
area t~e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywid~ Future Land Use Elan as Amenckd..
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.444. Conditional uses.
Within highway commercial districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
*
*
*
*
*
un Bltlic safety facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.445. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to highway commercial districts:
*
*
*
*
*
.(6) The permitted and conditional uses allowed in this district shalLbe su:bject to ~
area tJms1wld app~e to such. uses as set forth in t~es Concemin~ !be Administration of
the Countywiduuture Land Use Plan as Amended....
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.464. Conditional uses.
Within commercial center districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
ORDINANCE NO.
15
*
*
*
*
*
!l21 Public safety faci~
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.465. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to commercial center districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ill The permitted...and conditional uses allowed.Jn.Jhis....district sbalLbe subject to tlu:
area ~e to such u&es as set forth in the...Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywi<1uuture Land Use Elan as Amended..
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.474. Conditional uses.
Within downtown/mixed use districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ill)
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.475. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to downtown/mixed use districts:
*
*
*
*
*
(2)
area t~e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concernin~ the Administration of
the Countywide Future Land Use ~an as Amenc)M..
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
16
"". .
Sec. 40.484. Permitted uses.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Within the Core subdistrict, only the following uses and structures designed for
such uses shall be permitted:
*
*
*
*
*
~ Eu.blic safety facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict, only the following uses (and structures
designed for such uses) shall be permitted:
*
*
*
*
*
~
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.485. Conditional uses.
*
*
*
*
*
(1) Within the Bayfront subdistrict, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
*
*
*
*
*
;
i
,
i
I
au &bJic safety facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Within the Transition subdistrict, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
!W
ORDINANCE NO.
17
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.504. Conditional uses.
Within limited industrial districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
.u.u
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.505. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to limited industrial districts:
*
*
*
*
*
02l The permitted....and conditional uses aUowedJnJhis district s~ect to t~
area _e to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywi~ .future Land Use ~lan as Amended.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.524. Conditional uses.
Within research, development and office park districts, the following uses Inay be
allowed as conditional uses:
*
*
*
*
*
ill
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.525. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to research, development and office park districts:
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
18
.... . .. _ __~___...___ ...---~ - - --'-~' I ,.
, . . . ' ':.t
*
*
*
*
*
!l2l The permitte<1 and conditional uses a~is district shalLbe subject to t~
area thresl1Qkl applicable to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
!he Count.Ywi~uture Land Use ~an as Amend~
Sec. 40.543. Permitted uses.
Within public/semipublic districts, only the following uses and structures designed for
such uses shall be permitted:
*
*
*
*
*
(l5). Public safety facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.545. Use limitations.
The following use limitations apply to public/semipublic districts:
*
*
*
*
*
Ull The permittecland conditional uses allowed in this district s~bject to t~
area t~ applica.hJe to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywiduuture Land Use Ban. as Amend~
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 41.053. Supplementary standards by category of use.
The standards in this section which apply to the identified category of use shall
supplement the general standards of use identified in section 41.052. No conditional use shall be
authorized unless determined to meet all of the standards applicable thereto.
*
*
*
*
*
(25.1) fuWic safety facilities may be allowed within all residential districts. the limited
Q/fice district, general office district. neighborhood commercial district, North
Greenwood commercial district. beach commercial district, resort commercial.24
and 28 dj~tricts. I:eneral commercial district, infill commercial district. hil:~
commercial district. commercial center district. downtown/mixed use di~trict,
ORDINANCE NO.
19
- ';. . ---------- _._-._~-~. ~..-. .:. .,
*
*
*
*
*
bayfront and transitional...s.uhdistricts of the urban center district. limited industrial
district, and research. development and office parUistrict upon determination
that the use complies with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
(29.2) Utility facilities may be allowed as a conditional use in all zoning districts except
the limited industrial and public/semi-public districts, where they are allowed as a
permitted use, subject to all of the following:
(a) The size, scale, mass, noise generation, emissions generation, traffic
generation, and appearance of any buildings, structures, and facilities shall be
reasonably compatible with surrounding land uses.
(b) The use shall be buffered from adjoining properties in a manner consistent
with its size, scale, mass, noise generation, emissions generation, traffic
generation, and appearance to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. At a
minimum, the use shall meet the perimeter landscaping requirements of section
42.27(3) for non residential properties, unless located in an area where the
environmental characteristics made such buffering impractical. Police substations
may be exempted from these requirements if, in the opinion of the planning and
zoning board, compliance with the requirements is unnecessary for compatibility
with the surrounding uses.
(c) The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section
41.052.
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
ORDINANCE NO.
20
'<'.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Attest:
Leslie Dougall-Sides, Asst. City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
I
I
I
I
!
:!~
"
ORDINANCE NO.
21
- . . , " . ~... - -,... ~ ...... .
. . ~ .
~ ..' ,. - ,~~, T. _ ~. , ~, _. . ':;
c-f1
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
I V I tern #
o Meeting Date:
~~~1 C;
SUBJECT:
Land Development Code amendment allowing bed and breakfast inns as a conditional use within the
Multiple Family Residential 10 District, Neighborhood Commercial District, Beach Commercial District,
and Resort Commercial 24 and 28 Districts. (LDCA 96-09)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTIOI\I:
Receive proposed code amendment and refer to City Clerk for advertising for public hearing.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
City staff received a request from Mr. John Doran to include bed and breakfast inns as a conditional use
in the Beach Commercial District. Staff concurs. Furthermore, staff proposes to allow bed and breakfast
inns as a conditional use in four other zones where there is presently no accommodation for this use:
the Multiple Family Residential 10 District, Neighborhood Commercial District, and Resort Commercial
24 and 28 Districts. The use will be compatible with other uses in these districts and may create some
additional development opportunities consistent with the City's economic development goals.
This ordinance will need to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board. The following public hearing
schedule is proposed:
BOARD ACTION DATE
CITY COMMISSION RECEIPT & REFERRAL MAY 2, 1996
PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDA TION JUNE 4, 1996
CITY COMMISSION FIRST READING JUNE 20, 1996
CITY COMMISSION SECOND READING JUL Y 18, 1996
User Dcpt:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
Commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Deni ed
[] Continued to:
Revi ewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
I r-... '
LI/-,J
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-j."'.JiL
Origi~ting D~t:
CENTRAL PERMITTING
55
Costs: $ N/A
Total
SWAitted by: diz;;t-
City Manager ~ ~
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
, I
181 Not Requ ired
Affcct~ Parties
o Noti fi cd
181 Not Required
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
A ttachmcnts:
DRAFT ORDINANCE
o None
A~ropriation Code:
~ Printed on recycled pJpp.r
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE; AMENDING SECTIONS 40.134, 40.324, 40.365,
40.384, 40.404 AND 41.053, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO
ALLOW BED AND BREAKFAST INNS AS A CONDITIONAL
USE IN THE MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL "TEN"
DISTRICT, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
BEACH COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND RESORT
COMMERCIAL 24 AND 28 DISTRICTS; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Sections 40.134, 40.324, 40.365, 40.384, 40.404 and 41.053, Code of
Ordinances, are amended to read:
Sec. 40.134. Conditional uses.
Within Multiple-Family Residential "Ten" Districts, the following uses may be allowed
as conditional uses:
(1) Level II group care.
(2) Congregate care.
(3) Noncommercial parking.
(4) Residential shelters.
(5) Utility facilities.
@ Bed and breakfast inns.
* * * * *
Sec. 40.324. Conditional uses.
Within neighborhood commercial districts, the following uses may be allowed as
conditional uses:
(1) Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages located within 200 feet of a church or a
school or with outdoor seating where the service area is located within 200 feet
of a residential zone;
(2) Package alcoholic beverage sales (package sales);
(3) Level I group care;
(4) Level II grollp care;
(5) Level ill group care;
(6) Congregate care;
(7) Child day care;
(8) Veterinary offices;
(9) Residential shelters;
"
(10) Noncommercial parking;
(11) Utility facilities;
(12) Adult day care;
(13) Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or storage;.-;-
.c.HJ Bed and breakfast inns.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.365. Conditional uses.
Within beach commercial districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
(1) Outdoor commercial recreation/entertainment;
(2) Nightclubs, taverns and bars;
(3) Package alcoholic beverage sales (package sales);
(4) Marina facilities;
(5) Vehicle service;
(6) Video electronic game rooms;
2
ORDINANCE. NO.
(7) Veterinary offices;
(8) Utility facilities;
(9) Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages located within 200 feet of a church or a
school or with outdoor seating where the service area is located within 200 feet
of a residential zone~-;
!..liD. Bed and breakfast inns.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 40.384. Conditional uses.
With resort commercial 24 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Business/professional offices which serve the tourist;
Nightclubs, taverns and bars;
Package alcoholic beverage sales (package sales);
Outdoor commercial recreation/entertainment;
Recreational vehicle parks;
Marina facilities;
Video/ electronic game rooms;
Utility facilities;
Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages located within 200 feet of a church or a
school or with outdoor seating where the seIVice area is located within 200 feet
of a residential zone;-;-
QQl Bed and breakfast inns.
*
*
*
*
*
Se(. 40.404. Conditional uses.
Within resort commercial 28 districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional
3
ORDINANCE. NO.
uses:
(1) Business/professional offices which serve the tourist;
(2) Nightclubs, taverns and bars;
(3) Package alcoholic beverage sales (package sales);
(4) Outdoor commercial recreation/entertainment;
(5) Recreational vehicle parks;
(6) Marina facilities;
(7) Video/electronic game rooms;
(8) Utility facilities;
(9) Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages located within 200 feet of a church or a
school or with outdoor seating where the service area is located within 200 feet
of a residential zone.;.-;-
!.lQ). Bed and breakfast inns.
*
*
*
*
*
Sec. 41.053. Supplementary standards by category of use.
The standards in this section which apply to the identified category of use shall
supplement the general standards of use identified in section 41.052. No conditional use shall
be authorized unless detennined to meet all of the standards applicable thereto.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Bed and breakfast inn uses may be allowed in the neighborhood commercial
district. beach commercial district. resort commercial 24 and 28 districts. infill
commercial district, downtown/mixed use district, urban center district, and all
residential districts, subject to all of the following:
(a) The hours of operation are compatible with surrounding uses;
(b) The volume of traffic generated by the use is compatible with surrounding
uses;
4
ORDINANCE NO.
/,'
(c) Such uses shall only be provided in principal structures containing not less
than 1,500 square feet of gross floor area;
(d) Not more than 50 percent of the gross square footage of the principal
stnlcture shall be utilized for the bed and breakfast use. For the purpose
of calculating the area of the structure devoted to the bed and breakfast
use, only the floor area of the bedroom and bathroom areas utilized by the
bed and breakfast guests shall be considered in such calculations;
(e) The use shaH contribute significantly to the promotion of the city's
historical, cultural or natural heritage.
(t) The structure containing the use shall meet all applicable life safety codes
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
(g) The llse complies with all of the general standards contained in section
41.052 subscction (b) of this scction.
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING MID ADOPTED
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and Attest:
legal sufficiency:
Leslie Dougall-Sides, Asst. City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
5 ORDINANCE NO.
I~
Prepared by & return to:
Earl Barrett
Engineering Administration
City of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Fl. 34618-4748
SI:DEWALK
E A S E MEN T
FOR AND I~ CO~SI:DERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) cash in hand
paid to them the receipt of ~hich is hereby acknowledged, and the benefits to
be derived therefrom,
~om Fa1one, III, a married man
~200 Hermitage Avenue
C1earwater, Fl. 335(6
does hereby grant and convey to the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, an easement
over, under and across the following described land, lying and being situate
in the County of Pinellas, state of Florida, to-wit:
A portion of the SE~ of the NW~ of section 13, Township 29 South,
Range 15 East located according to the plat of property of A & W
GLADS, INC., recorded in Plat Book 25, on Pages 53 and 54, of the
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, as more particularly
described in attached EXHIBIT A.
This easement is for sidewalk purposes.
The CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, shall have the right to enter the
above described prenises and inspect the placenent and dimensions of said
sidewalks to insure conformance with city specifications and thereafter
maintain same from time to time; and that,
The GENERAL PUBLIC shall have full and free use of said sidewalk at any
time and all times for traveling purposes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party hereto has caused these presents to be
duly executed this .-;)t) day of I1?rllfclf ' 1996.
siqned, sea1ed and delivered
in the presence of:
~~;:I1L~
'--tUA/YU 0~~.
~ss '
j u n€'" \)o:;{C I ~ ",)
witness' Printed s~9nature
~.-;K t!P
Wf'i~-ti IJ. C Ict.r /L
witnes.' Printed signature
Page 1 of J
Acknowledgement:
RE: Sidewalk Easement
Grantor: Tom Falone, III
Grantee: City of Clearwater
STATE OP PLORIDA
.
.
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
.
.
The for~gping instrument was acknowledged before me thiS'~ day of
m ~tR Lt:t--, 1996 by Tom F'alone, III.
~~b0' ~~~rida
Print name J5'LGA,VO 12. L. Sc..AIl.Fo,uiE
~J'lUAL-~C'E\;r~~".\!.
El:cA.i~CR L ~i:;'.._r.O::'.iE
N01'J.-,'\Y 1=';.nI~C ~l'/t.i~ 0~ -;.ifYJ:r....:.~
COl'tfi~L~;t\}'~ ~.. c.:i:~~;(l:
NY ,iSSON p M~R. 11,1~;7
~ Personally known
[ ] Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Page 2 of 3
MORTGAGEE CONSENT TO EASEMENT
CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST, f/k/a citizens Bank of Clearwater, 1150~~~laoo
Street, Clearwater, Florida 34615, a Florida Banking Corporation, on this
~ day of n10rC/' , 1996, in consideration of receipt of One
Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, which is hereby
acknowledged, and execution of the grant of easement or right-of-way by the
fee owner of the premises described herein, the terms of which are
incorporated herein and, by reference, made a part hereof, being the owner
and holder of all the indebtedness secured by that certain mortgage dated
March 28, 1988 and recorded in O.R. Book 6710, Page 1801, said mortgage
having been subsequently modified by that certain Mortgage Modification
Agreement dated March 28, 1991, recorded in O.R. Book 7528, Page 1549,
further modified by that certain Mortgage Modification Agreement dated August
28, 1992, recorded in G.R. Book 8046, Page 2178, and further modified by that
certain Mortgage Modification Agreement dated August 31, 1995, recorded in
O.R. Book 9095, Page 502, all being in the Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida; hereby consents and agrees to the grant of easement as described
herein, and grants to the City of Clearwater, Florida, a Florida Municipal
corporation, Grantee, its successors and assigns, the same right-of-way, and
agrees that such right-of-way shall be prior and paramount to all rights
under such mortgage, and any future modifications thereof; and that any sale
under foreclosure of said mortgage shall be subject to such right-of-way.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
CITIZENS BANK & TRUST, f/kja
citizens Bank of Clearwater
(' c-~
~.._- ,
By. :
DaV-d~:~- ~tone, President
-~-( ~ '1b1A, ~i:'/ t' f(tJ I/?!'; (Ii::.
WI ESS
Print name K./'/S!;//€- ;9-~ rJ7d~Y/J1lc):..
~lJ!~
WITN
Prin name % b I.( j(, /l,.{ ()~.s
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
.
.
.
.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~D~ day of
r~d(Ch , 1996 by David P. Stone, as President, Citizens
Bank and Trust, fjk/a citizens Bank of Clearwater, on behalf of said
corporation and for the purposes described therein.
~/f ',)~1u. it l,j)-[
Not ry Public - state of F~orida
Pr int name 1<-1//511,10'- If. I}Jc1~'ri )l/C!t...
KRISnNE It. McCORMI
NOTARY PUBUC. STATE Of FI.DRIDA
tit CQUU. EXP. DEC. I, 1_
COMM. , CC 424903
[)q Personally Known
[ ] Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Page 3 of 3
;.,.' -.'
-'
c(
~
I.&.J
-'
,.,
o
. , 0
,::.:.'. '..' N
10
I
v
N
o
N
,.,
o
o
ci
o
I
v
N
o
N
,.,
o
<:
~
\
\
. .
. . ,
....
w
~
<:
z
w
J
G:
o
...
W
J
<
()
(/)
-:
~
rij
....
w
~
F
CD
01
.........
CD
('oj
.........
('oj
o
~
<(
Q
~
<
CJ)
<
a:
:)
t-
O
a:
<
,
/ FALONE
COMMERCIAL
CENTER
I~X]IIBll' A
.
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
.
I
I I
\ ,
, I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I . :
I . , I
I I CO .
.- .
\ \ ' '~ i
\\ "...-..
'0 :
\ \ ~ ,
\ \ ,~
N01"2~'tA"W \J~6'
5.Ur' ~..
, \ .~..~
\ " ~
~ IT 1-",' I ~. -.. "'-N89~ ~2'5'3-';-W r
"l.J :d~1l0!K ' L. I ~.
..... I _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _, _ _ I
" -=-j,- ~ 1 -
~ _ - :__~~9J.~i3~WJ= = j
PROPOsro EASEMENT
TO en'f Of ClEARWA TER
SW ~(R or S( 1/4 Of' ~w 1/4 f' ~
or SECTION 1.3, TOV.~SHIP zg. RANG( 15: ~ SS
,,~---.J ~ GULF..TO-BAY (SR 60)
S89'22'53"E
30.00'
0' 10' 20'
~..rtf..rij~<tJ:~
SCALE: ,. = 10'
-
'. .. ., .'
LEGAL DESCRIPnON:
THAT PART or lHE SE 1/4 or lliE NW 1/-i or SECllON 13, 10\l,NSHIP 29 5, RANGE 15 E,
LOCA no ACCORDING TO THE PLAT or PROPERll' or A&W GLADS, INC., RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 25. ON PAGES 53 AND 54, or THE PU8UC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, flORIDA,
AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGIN AT 1HE SW CORNER OF SAID SE 1/4 Of NW 1/4, AND RUN THENCE S 89"22'5.3- E,
ALONG THE CENTERLINE (E GULf 10 BAY BOULEVARD 30,0 FT.; THENCE RUN N 01"27'18- W,
50.03 fT, TO A POINT IN mE NORlll RIGH1-0f -WAY BOU~DARY Of CULF TO BAY BOULEVARD
WHICH IS 30.0 FT EAST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY fROM I1S INTERSECTION Willi THE v.rST
BOUNDARY Of' SAID SE 1/4 or NW 1/4 FOR THE POB. FROM TI-iE POB rnus ESTABLISHED,
CONTINUE N 0\'27'18- W ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY or ARClURAS AVENUE RIGHT-Or-WAY
5.81 FT.; THENCE S 46'02'13" E' 7.46 fT.; THENCE N 8922'53- W ALONG lHE NORTli
BOUNDARY Of GULF TO BAY 80ULEVARD 5.18 fl., TO lliE POB.
CONTAINING 13 SQUARE fEET, MORE OR LESS.
~lf.S:
1. THIS SI([ re:., DO!:S NOT '1(Pili: SENT
A BOUNDARY SURvty.
2. BEARINGS m BASED UPON THE PLAT
Of' . A. I: W. CUDS, !He: AS REFERRED
TO IN LEC.-.L DES(:RIPllOH.
TOM f ALONE COMMERCIAL CEN lER
GULF - 10- 8A Y AND ARCnJRAS A VENUE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
T:'E
.:.;)
PR(),{CT 1fO~
2024-52.00
ORA\lrN BY:
CJt.A
CHE CJ([.D BY:
TJa
OAT! PR(PAAtO
02/26/96
SIDEWALK EASEMENT
TAMPA BAY
ENGINEERING, inc.
102 w. ~1T1NG STREET
SUI TE <400
TAMPA. fl 33602
PH (813) 221-000\8
A G R E E MEN T
~o
THIS AGREEHENT, made and entered into
this day of , 19 ,
by and between Nicola Izzo of 1836 Diane Drive, Clear~ater, Florida
346:1.9, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORI:DA, a municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City;"
WIT N E SSE T H :
WHEREAS, the Owner presently owns the real property described
herein, and has requested that the city install a sanitary sewer line
and facility to make sanitary sewer service available to serve the
property and that the Owner be permitted to tap into the sanitary sewer
line upon installation; and
WHEREAS, the Owner is agreeable to have the city of Clearwater
complete said special improvement and upon completion thereof to have
the City immediately file a lien against the property in the amount of
their pro rata share of the cost of installation of the sanitary sewer
line and facility; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to install the sanitary sewer line
and facility to serve the property under certain conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and
other good and valuable considerations, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. The Owner agrees that the City may immediately commence and
complete the installation of a sanitary sewer line and facility to
serve the real property owned by them, legally described as follows:
Lot 16 , Dlock "I", Carlton Terrace
First Addition. according to the map or plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 43, page
39 , Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida.
Known as: 1836 Diane Drive
Clearwater, Florida 34619
and that upon completion of said work that the city may immediately
file a lien against the real property in the amount of $1,016.12
which is the Owner's pro rata share of the installation of the sanitary
sewer line and facility. Said lien shall provide that it may be paid
in ten equal annual payments in the office of the city Clerk with
interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of the lien until
paid and in case of default in the payment of said minimum annual
payments, together with the interest thereon, that the City may take
immediate steps to enforce said lien by foreclosure or other
proceedings. Said lien shall also provide that if the City is required
to enforce the collection thereof by foreclosure or other proceedings,
that the Owner shall be responsible for the payment of legal fees and'
all costs of said proceedings.
'dO
2. The Owner by this Agreement specifically grants unto the City
of Clearwater a lien in the amount set forth in Paragraph 1 above,
which is the Owner I s pro rata share for the installation of the
sanitary sewer line and facility against the above described real
property and waives all requirements for and entitlement to the conduct
of and notice of any public hearing by the city of Clearwater for a
special improvement assessment against their property for the
installation of said sanitary sewer line and facility. The Owner
further agrees upon the request of the city to execute all additional
instruments, if any, which may be required to formally grant unto the
City a lien against their described real property.
3. The City agrees to permit the Owner upon the completion of
said installation to connect to the sanitary sewer line under the same
conditions as other owners are permitted to do so.
4. This agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, administra-
tors, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto and a copy thereof may be immediately recorded in the Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida, by the City so as to serve as
notice thereof to all other persons.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents
to be executed on the date first above written.
QL~.1 ~. Yv\C'-'-<"-1
WITNESS
R 0 {~ ~ r(T :r \ /'-1 A " ,q h.
Witness Printed Signature
fi~ ~.;4~"
Nicola IZZ~ ~
1836 Diane Drive
Clearwater, Florida 34619
;fi2r ? ~
WITNESS
&c:-~/ R h-A?K/~$
Witness Printed Signature
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
fqe foregoin9 instrument was acknowledged before me this ~day
of Mf\1l.LH , 19q~ by Nicola Izzo, who is personally known to me or
who has produced LbLA 1'Z.-z.O as identification and who ( ) did
~did not take an oath. ft,OL-~' to2D,k)t2g0 ~ 4I8(30
~
Signature person taking acknowledgment
Type/prin / ledger
Title or rank, and Serial No., if any
, . . .. ... ~ .."..
, '
. , .., . I . .
Countersigned:
20
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
By:
Elizabeth M. Deptula
City Manager
ATTEST:
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
J:i?~a~ -
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Page 3 of Agreement between the CITY
Nicola rZ20 bearing the date of
sanitary sewer for Lot 16 , Block
Addition (subdivision).
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, and
, 1996 regarding
Carlton Terrace First
"I"
,
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF prNELLAS )
BEFORE ME, the undersigned, personally appeared Rita Garvey, the
Mayor-Commissioner of the city of Clearwater, Florida, to me well known
to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged
the execution thereof to be her free act and deed for the use and
purposes herein set forth.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
day of
,
19
Notary Public
Pr int IType Name:
My commission Expires:
(include Commission No.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF P~NELLAS
BEFORE ME, the undersigned, personally appeared Elizabeth M.
Deptula, the city Manager of the city of Clearwater, Florida, to me
well known to be the person ~ho executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged the execution thereof to be his free act and deed for the
use and purposes herein set forth.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
day of
,
19
Notary Public
Print/type name:
My Commission Expires:
(include commission No.
~N 5
d\
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet
, ~ t;. ~ ~ < '\'.
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
II; t, " .< ,;:. .!99b
,;
THROUGH:
Elizabeth M. Deptula, City Manager
Richard J. Baier, City Engineer!~.
Kathy s. Rice, Deputy City Mana~~r
William C. Baker, Assistant city Manager
cynthia Goudeau, city Clerk
',,: I ! '( iVI rii\JAG C R
FROM:
COPIES:
SUBJECT: Memorial Causeway Bridge
DATE: April 24, 1996
As discussed last year, the State Environmental Impact Report is at
a stage where it must be decided whether or not to upgrade the
document to a formal NEPA proj eet Development and Environment
study.
In addition, it is time to update the general public as to the
staff and consultant progress as well as brief all concerned
parties on the funding al ternati ves. I have attached a brief
overview of the topics I suggest we discuss on May 2. Please feel
free to address other bridge issues and we will be more than
willing to provide the necessary information.
If you have any questions, please contact me at ext. 6042.
RJB/mp
Attachment
Dlel1lupdl. rjb
.... _ _~~_.. .__ _-.-_~ .___ __OM _ _ _ . ,.
_ '. 6 .
Memorial Causeway Bridge Project Development
and Environment (PD&E) Study
4/23/96
~\
ITEMS TO BE COVERED IN MAY 2 1996
UPDATE TO THE CITY COMMISSION
1. Upgrade of Study to a Federal PD&E Process
. Present study is a State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR)
· Coast Guard wants to be a lead agency if no federal funds are proposed
. Coast Guard permit will be required which will trigger the Federal process
. Implications to the Study:
· Study Cost -- Present contract includes a 20 percent contingency for
"unexpected" work. We believe that the additional work can be done
within this contingency. (The additional work consists primarily of
activities related to cultural resources evaluation, documentation, and
coordination. )
, . Study Schedule -- An additional 2 to 3 months is expected due to the
additional review time, coordination meetings, and responses to
additional comments. This would result in an approximate 21 month
schedule, with a new projected completion in July or August '97.
2. Study Update & Status
. Engineering Activities
. Traffic analysis and report preparation underway.
. Design alternatives under study and refinement.
. Evaluating potential economic impacts to downtown.
. Public Involvement
. First Local Interest Group (LIG) meeting held on 3/28/96
. Second LIG meeting scheduled for 5/23/96
3. Investigation of Funding Alternatives for a New Bridge
. Penny for Pinellas sales tax (if extended by the voters next year)
. Local ad valorem taxes
. State gas tax revenues
. Local funding with eventual reimbursement by FDOT
. Local "tourist tax" revenues
. Other local sources
w:\rnemorial.pde\memos\me042396.doc
HDR Engineering, Inc.
-, .'~ . . .:' -~~. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cler~
SUBJECT: Follow up from April 29, 1996 Work Session
COPIES: Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager
DATE: April 30, 1996
In response to questions raised at the April 29, 1996, Work Session the following answers
are provided in fmal agenda order.
Item 1115 - Shop Drawings
Post, Buckley, Shuh and Jerni
~em ~- Memorial Causeway Bridge: The cost of the SEIR Study is $743,668 plus a
$115,521 (20%) contingency. The level of contingency is standard for this type of study. Thus
far, none of the contingency has been spent. To upgrade to a full NEP A PD&E study will cost
$39.,400. Subtracting this amount from the existing contingency leaves a contingency of
approximately $76,000. The Resolution regarding State Funding is in the agenda pack. County
and State Funding will be added to the investigation of funding listing.
The multiplier to be used for the work by
Item #25 - Be utification Committee:
believes 7 members ar suffic.ient will be pr
morning.
I at ion regarding whether the Committee
oed after the Committee meets on Wednesday
DOT Sig - Rich Baier will re uest the sign at 510 Cleveland Street be moved out of the
trees. sk Clearwater be added t the northbound sign coming out of St. Petersburg.
ment Council: Mr. Evans has served one two year term on
Item #28 - Economic
this council (5/94 to 5/96).
an upcoming- agenda):
d\C\
RESOLUTION NO. 96-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO REPLACE
THE EXISTING MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY WEST BRIDGE AND
ESTABLISHING ITS REPLACEMENT AS A HIGH
PRIORITY PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE
APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO PROCEED WITH
GETTING THE PROJECT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE STATE
FUNDING FROM MONEYS ALLOCATED IN SENATE BILL
438 AND HOUSE BILL 539; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission has evaluated the impact that the
existing Memorial Causeway West Bridge has on both pedestrian,
bicycle and vehicular traffic using Memorial Causeway to access and
leave Clearwater Beach, Island Estates and Sand Key; and
WHEREAS, the Memorial Causeway West Bridge is the primary and
sole evacuation route for the North end of Sand Key, all of
Clear ater Beach and Island Estates; and
WHEREAS, the number of vehicles per day using the causeway,
which ranges from a low of approximately 31,400 vehicles per day to
a hi h of 50,400 vehicles per day, with an average of 38,000
vehicles per day in 1994; and
Memorial Causeway Bridge is one of the top 10
within the City of Clearwater; and
HEREAS, the bridge is deficient under current design
rdsi and
HEREAS, the level of service 1n 1991} \^Jas estimated to be a
"D", this excludes the opening schedule and bridge malfunctions
which would lower the level of service to "E";
HEREAS, the number of openings exhibits the highest average
annua daily traffic of any four-lane drawspan bridge along the
entir~ West coast of Florida; and
HEREAS, a new 4 lane divided, high level fixed bridge, built
rent state standards wi th safety shoulders, raised separator
n pedestrian and vehicular traffic as well as adequate
lk width for pedestrian and bicycle traffic will eliminate
:most f the problems now associated with the existing bridge; now,
there-ore,
~\~
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the replacement of the Memorial Causeway West
Bridge is of the highest priority to the City of Clearwater.
Section 2. That the City Officials are authorized to take the
necessary steps to obtain funding from the State for a replacement
bridge.
Section 3. This Resolution shall be forwarded to the State to
show the City's intent to request the funding from moneys allocated
in State Senate Bill 438 and state House Bill 539.
Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
adoption.
I
I
{
l
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
, 1996.
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
BRIDGRES.WJS
4/26/96
Q I b.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, REQUESTING THE HONORABLE UNITED
STATES SENATORS ROBERT GRAHAM AND CONNIE
MACK AND HONORABLE UNITED STATES
REPRESENTATIVES MICHAEL BILlRAKIS AND C.W. "BILL"
YOUNG TO ASSIST THE CITY OF CLEARWATER IN
OBTAINING FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO REPLACE THE
EXISTING STATE ROAD 60 MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY
WEST BRIDGE WHICH CROSSES THE INTRACOASTAL
WATERWAY WITH A HIGH LEVEL FOUR LANE DIVIDED
BRIDGE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission has evaluated the impact that the existing
Memorial Causeway West Bridge has on both pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular traffic
using Memorial Causeway to access and leave Clearwater Beach, Island Estates and
Sand Key; and
WHEREAS, the Memorial Causeway West Bridge is the primary and sole
evacuation route for the North end of Sand Key, all of Clearwater Beach and Island
Estates; and
WHEREAS, the number of vehicles per day using the causeway, which ranges
from a low of approximately 31,400 vehicles per day to a high of 50.400 vehicles per day,
with an average of 38,000 vehicles per day in 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Memorial Causeway Bridge is one of the top,1 0 accident locations
within the City of Clearwater; and
WHEREAS, the bridge is deficient under current design standards; and
WHEREAS, a new 4 lane divided, high level fixed bridge, built to current State
standards with safety shoulders, raised separator between pedestrian and vehicular traffic
as well as adequate sidewalk width for pedestrian and bicycle traffic will eliminate most of
the safety problems now associated with the existing bridge; and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has funded a feasibility study and the
preliminary design; and
Resolution 96-39
~\ b.
WHEREAS, Federal funding could be made available through the Federal
Highway Administration or other Federal funding sources as may be determined
appropriate by the United States Congress; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
~ That the replacement of the Memorial Causeway West Bridge is of the
highest priority to the City of Clearwater.
~ That Federal funding available through the Federal Highway
Administration or other Federal funding sources, be requested through our Congressional
Repre _~ntatives.
~ Copies of this Resolution shall be forwarded to each of the Honorable
United States Senators, Robert Graham and Connie Mack and Honorable United States
Representatives, Michael Bilirakis and C.W. 118i11" Young requesting their assistance in
obtaining Federal funding to replace the Memorial Causeway West Bridge.
~ This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
, 1996.
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form:
Attest:
1t~
Pamela K. Akin
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Resolution 96-39
... . - - ~ --~-- -~-_.- -
. '
'".', ..
-?:--:':: ~:'.:;:' . .'
Item # 22
1
I
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
i
F J3S-
CfG
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
I tern II
:~ ~ He.tlng Dot.:
c: . ') /"'..
~:::>. 0(, q \lJ
SUBJECT:
Design Review Board - Design Guidelines - Downtown Clearwater
RECOMM EN DA TIO N/MOTION:
Approve Downtown Clearwater Design Guidelines and pass Resolution No. 96-35 ; provide direction
to staff with regard to other design review issues.
[] and that the appropriate officiaLs be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
The City Commission has established a design review program and created a Design Review Board. The
intention behind these actions is to create an architectural review process for projects in Downtown
Clearwater and in the commercial areas of Clearwater Beach and North Greenwood.
The Design Review Board has developed, in accordance with the City Code and the Downtown
Redevelopment Plan, a set of design guidelines for Downtown Clearwater. The Board will begin
formulating design guidelines for Clearwater Beach and North Greenwood as part of its assigned duties.
Attached please find the design guidelines for Downtown Clearwater. These guidelines will govern the
exterior features of new construction, additions, renovations, signage, and site development. The
program is intended to be expeditious, user-friendly, and educational in nature, as well as provide the
regulatory commitment to coordinate appropriate and compatible architectural design.
Resolution No. ~(P-35 is attached for Commission adoption of the design guidelines. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution.
Staff also seeks Commission direction in the following areas:
Ii> Whether additional areas should be covered by design guidelines - Staff has received requests for
protection of historic resources in the Harbor Oaks, Old Clearwater Bay and Bavview
neighborhoods. We believe that application of design guidelines is the most effective and straight-
forward method available to protect these resources and to provide neighborhood continuity.
Revi ewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
--1.h - S
N/A
N/A
N/A
~A
'U:::> 17-
Originating Dept:
CENTRAL PERMITTING
Costs: $ MIA
TotaL
User Dept:
$
Current FiscaL Yr.
ea.ission Action:
a Approved
a Approved w/conditions
a Denied
a Continued to:
~
/1....' ~,
Advertised:
Date:
Peper:
IllI Not Requi red
fected Parties
o Notified
IllI Not Requi red
Fuding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operati ng
o Other
Attact.ents:
DESIGN mJlDELINES
RESOLUTION No.96-35
sut.itted by:
City Manager'r?
AJpropr i at i on code:
o None
~ Printed on recycLed paper
Design Guidelines - Downtown
Page 2
It> Assignment of CRA and City architectural grant programs to the Design Review Board - Both the
City and the CRA have some limited grant programs for architectural design assistance. Staff
feels it appropriate to assign these grant programs to the Design Review Board to administer.
It> Assignment of sign bonus provisions to the Design Review Board - The sign code provides for
some sign bonus provisions for certain types of signage in Downtown Clearwater. The bonus
program is administered by a City staff committee. Instead of using the staff committee to
administer the bonus program, we recommend assigning this task to the Design Review Board.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, MAKING FINDINGS AND ADOPTING
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE URBAN CENTER
ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater established a Design Review Board by
adoption of Code of Ordinances Section 36.038, and the Design Review Board
has the jurisdiction and authority to review, evaluate, and determine certain
applications for development review in the Urban Center (Downtown), North
Greenwood Commercial, and Clearwater Beach commercial and resort
commercial zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, Section 36.038(10) provides that design guidelines for each
area shall be established by resolution of the City Commission, and that such
guidelines shall specify the nature of the review, the specific categories of
architectural features subject to design review, the design requirements for these
categories of architectural features, and other information pertinent to the area's
design review program; and
WHEREAS, in order to carry out its prescribed duties, the Design Review
Board has developed Design Guidelines for the Urban Center District in
accordance with the City Code and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, and has
obtained input from numerous individuals and organizations, including: the
Clearwater Downtown Partnership; the Design Committee and Design Group of
the Downtown Partnership; the Clearwater Historical Society; the National Trust
for Historic Preservation; Design Review Board members; and staff of the City of
Clearwater; and
WH EREAS, the Design Guidelines for the Urban Center District will
govern the exterior features of new construction, additions, renovations, signage,
and site development, and will provide an expeditious, user-friendly, and
educational procedure for obtaining development approval while safeguarding
the City's regulatory commitment to coordinate appropriate and compatible
architectural design within the Urban Center District; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board has developed and approved a
Design Review Process and Project Evaluation Analysis to be used in the
approval process, and these are incorporated into the Design Guidelines; and
Resolution No. 96-35
WHEREAS, adoption of the Design Guidelines for the Urban Center
District is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the City of Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
~ The above recitals are hereby adopted as Findings.
~ The attached Design Guidelines for the Urban Center District
are hereby approved. The Design Review Board is hereby directed to use the
Guidelines in reviewing, evaluating, and determining those applications for
development review regarding development within the Urban Center zoning
district falling within the Board's jurisdiction.
~ This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
, 1996.
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
)
\. ~
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall- Id s
Assistant City Atto y
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Resolution No. 96-35
DESIGN
GUIDELINES
A GUIDE TO NEW CONSTRUCTION,
BUILDING ADDITIONS,
FACADE ALTERATIONS, AND
SIGNAGE FOR
THE URBAN CENTER DISTRICT
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
HEEPIIIG UP
ApPIAUICES
~ ~ y ,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Background and Use of Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Design Review Statement ........................................ 4
Parking & Access to Property . .
..... ............. ......
..........5
Guidelines for Existing Buildings
...... ....... ...... .....
..........6
Street Front Facades and Storefronts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Store Windows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Doors and Frnmes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Colors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Signage and Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Awnings and Canopies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
.::
Off-Street Facades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
,
,
Guidelines for New Construction-Inrill ............................... 19
New Buildings and Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Landscape & Streetscape Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Streetscape Design
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Street Furnishings & Equipment .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Project Evaluation Analysis ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Process & Procedures
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Acknow ledgements
....................
. . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
INTRODUCTION
These Downtown Design Guidelines shall serve as a guide and tool for both new
development as well as renovation and rehabilitation of existing properties in the Urban Center
District of Clearwater, Florida. These guidelines are developed from the previous Central
Business District guidelines prepared in July, 1994 by the Design Group for the Clearwater
Downtown Partnership. Appreciation is hereby given to all the individuals and organizations
who contributed to the preparation of both those guidelines and to these updated expanded
guidelines.
These Design Guidelines recognize the diversity which exists downtown and therefore
do not dictate a specific solution or style. These Guidelines further enhance the previous
guidelines in order to accomplish five major purposes:
TO ENSURE AN ORDERLY. mGH QUAUTY REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS. As
Downtown Clearwater continues to experience renewal, each renovation and new construction
should contribute to the overall image and character of the area. These guidelines promote
quality standards for owners and businesses to follow.
TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE MAJOR PUBUC INVESTMENTS IN THE AREA.
The City's Community Redevelopment Agency has made a substantial commitment to the
revitalization of Downtown Clearwater through investments in sidewalks, Station Square Park,
parking garages and Harborview Center. The City is also constructing a new Municipal Services
Complex, a parking garage facility, and improvements to Coachman Park.
TO ENCOURAGE BOTH SMALL AND LARGE SCALE PUBliC AND PRIVATE
INVESTMENT IN DOWNTOWN CLEARW A TPR. Major private investment in the area has
already occurred and is expected to continue. Private enterprise projects as well as the
governmental buildings, such as the old Post Office and the County Courthouse, represent
substantial commitments to Downtown revitalization. These guidelines assure that future
development does not compromise the quality. of the surrounding properties.
TO MINIMIZE RENOV A nON COSTS AND MAXIMIZE NEW DEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL BY ELIMINATING GUESSWORK AND REDUCING POTENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT PROBLEM:S. Any major rehabilitation or new construction project requires
investments of time and money before receiving approval. The City wishes to assist in these
efforts by offering clear planning, design guidelines and illustrations.
TO PROTECT AND MAINTAIN HISTORIC FEA~. O~der buildings possess
character, tradition, workmanship and a pedestrian scale that is not easily duplicated. The City
intends to preserve the historic integrity of Downtown CIeaIWater.
2
" ". ' '. _~_____ ",., ~~, ~_ ~~_~~~'_~~'____h_"" '_h~_~_~_' "_'-_~"h'~'_'-~~~----'~-~- .. ~:~:_~~.__..~~-, ~-" h'_ ~,:. d.' - .. .";'u~:._,~__
BACKGROUND
The City of Clearwater has been actively pursuing Downtown development since the mid-
1970's. Through both public and private commitment and investments, Downtown ClealWater
has continued to serve as the center for City and County Govenlments and has encouraged
commercial, business and office expansion.
In 1995, the City of Clearwater has taken significant action toward the preservation,
restoration, redevelopment and future vitality of the Downtown. In May, the City Commission
passed and adopted Ordinance 581 7-95 creating the Design Review Board to review, evaluate
and render decisions on building plans and signage plans to promote a cohesive, attractive,
revitalized pedestrian-oriented environment. In accordance with Code of Ordinances Section
36.038(10), these Guidelines are designated as regulatory.
The City, through the Community Redevelopment Agency, has also adopted an updated
Downtown Redevelopment Plan that supports the traditional town center concept.
HOW TO USE TlIESE GUIDELINES
All plans for exterior constnlction and signage projects, whether remodeling, additions,
color changes or new construction, must first be presented to the Design Review Board for
review and approval prior to the issuance of any building pennits. Applicants should review
these guidelines and utilize suggested recommendations in their design plans. City staff will
provide assistance in interpretation of the guidelines and requests for review of preliminary
plans.
Older Buildings
If the building is in its original condition, remodeling should emphasize features
hannonious with facades and storefronts along the street. Try to think about the proportion,
scale, materials and color. Rescue and reuse architectural elements from buildings which are
about to be demolished. Give special consideration to the reuse or possible restoration of
existing buildings that may have a relationship to Clearwater's history.
Newer Buildings
Newer buildings should be integrated with the existing Downtown design when they are
located in the same or adjacent block areas. They need to be sensitive and responsive to the
scale and proportions of neighboring buildings. They do not need to replicate old buildings.
New Developments
New buildings and developments in unrelated blocks, though independent, should still
be cognizant of the important features, elements and materials prevalent in the District and
integrate some of them if they are consistent with a new design. All new buildings and
development proposals should apply and incorporate good architectural design principles and
pedestrian friendly (people oriented) features.
3
DESIGN REVIEW STATEMENT
~ ~~ VERSUS AFSUIETlC CONTROL
Design review is not synonymous with aesthetic control. The latter dwells upon the
superficial aspects of the visual setting. Aesthetic control is narrowly focused and prescriptive.
DESIGN REVIEW SHOULD BE BROADLY ORIENTED AND ENCOUBAOE TIlE
CREATIVE APPUCATION OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES TO A SPECIFIC SITE.
Aesthetic control seeks to severely limit choices, whUe design review attempts to
expand choices. Aesthetic control is concerned with product, while design review is concerned
with performance. Aesthetic oontrol is exclusionary; design review embraces different
solutions to general criteria. Aesthetic control uses rigid roles, while design review deals in
principles. Moreover, aesthetic control involves unilateral mandates; design review involves
collaboration and accommodation throughout the design process. Finally, aesthetic control
values conformity, while design review values creativity. Fortunately, the shallow and often
rigid technique of aesthetic control is giving way to design review, which is more comprehensive
and effective.
Reprinted from:
Design Review
Mark L. Hinshaw, AICP
Planning Advisory Service, Report #454
ARCHIIEClURAL IARlm
4
PARKING AND ACCESS TO PROPERTY
Adequate and convenient parking is an essential element toward the success of Downtown
Clearwater and the Urban Center District. The City of Cleaxwater's Land Development Code
governs the number of parking spaces required for each use and will detennine the parking
needs for individual businesses. (See also, 'Location of off-street parking' under the section on
New Construction - Infill.)
Creative parking solutions are a necessary fact of life in downtowns, since parking lots
consume valuable space and are a major development oost.
Consider the following:
Multiple uses of parking. It is possible that two or more businesses could use the same
parking spaces if they attract people at different times of the day and night. For example, night
clubs or theaters might share parking with retail stores or offices.
Remote all-day employee parking. For certain businesses, purchasing stickers for
employees in a city garage would allow nearby parking to be used by customers. Also, remote
site parking with a shuttle service to the Downtown would alleviate traffic congestion and
parking demands.
Access to properties. Drive entrances should be clearly dermed to avoid confusion and
minimi7.e oonflict with pedestrian movements. Attractive entrance and exit signage and changes
in pavement materials or textures are also recommended.
~
JAr1r
5
GUIDELINES FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS
Recommended:
Think about the look, character and history of each building and read this section to get
ideas for an overall approach. The least expensive ways to start are with paint, color, awnings
and signage. The Design Review Board places special emphasis on the proper use and
coordination of colors in painting buildings, signs and other project elements.
Retain, whenever possible, all elements, materials, and features that are original to the
building. Do careful, sensitive remodelings and repairs as necessary.
Remove any materials from the facade which have been added overtime and which cover
the whole facade or parts of it. Conduct pictorial research to determine the design of the
original building. Conduct exploratory demolition to determine what remains and its condition.
Return the facade to its original configuration, restoring as many original elements as possible
particularly the materials, windows, cornices, and decorative details.
Remove all inappropriate signs and 'add-on' canopies including those that cover
architectural elements such as windows, cornices, or decorative features, or whicb are too large
for the front of the building.
Remodel storefronts in a way that respects the configuration and materials of traditional
storefront design. Reconstnlct the original storefront if missing or design a new storefront that
respects the character, materials, and design of the building.
HEIPIII UP
APPEARAIICES
--
6
STREET FRONT FACADES AND STOREFRONiS
Downtown commercial buildings have a similar composition even tllough the number of
stories, style, materials, or details may differ. Typically, the fIrSt floor has a transparent
storefront framed by vertical structural piers and a horizontal supporting beam. The storefront
area has an entrance (usually recessed), display windows, display window support panelst a
transom area over the storefront, and a cornice which covers the horizontal beam. It may also
have an entrance to the upper floors. The facade of the upper floors is generally characterized
by evenly spaced window openings that repeat on each floor. The windows may vary in size,
type and decoration. Finally t the building is capped by a cornice which may be made of metalt
masonry coIbeling or wood. All of these elements were designed to work together to create an
overall unified appearance.
The look of storefronts and windows along the street gives the strongest impression.
Together with signs, they have the greatest potential for affecting the character of an entire
building or block. Hannony is the key in creating an attractive image.
TYPICAL PROBLEMS
Most commercial facades have been heavily altered over the years, giving the buildings
either a poorly maintained or a disjointed appearance.
Complete cover up.
Many downtown commercial buildings have been covered by materials that obliterate
windows, cornices, and original building materials. These changes were made to "modernize",
attract the attention of motorists, and compete with the shopping malls.
Thls b m. bask: buIIcIrw block lqipl
01 Man Stnec-ihe cndldoClal !l
IU'Hdronc CCl"IIIMtcw....
AIthouah bulk In many lias.
Ihapes and ~lI:was..
eaentfaIJy the same facade.
Facades of tNs tnJe IIntcI
Haln Street on both .Id...
Ona nuc to a.nocher. they formed ItrOnIe aoIId
bIodca. marked by the ~ 01 repeadna pans.
Because It was composed of aImIIar fac:adts. the
block had I conslstent. orp1Ized and coonInated
appearance. Faada were related to ach other
throtJ&h compadbIIIty In ~ wtchh..etbadc. pr0-
portions of ~ composIdan and ~
'HE PlAIII SIIIEEr
ARClIllEDURAl
IUIIIIOI
c::a:::I
7
Removal of architectural elements.
Elements such as cornices, windows, and decorative features were not maintained
properly and were often removed instead of being repaired and retained.
Storefront remodeling.
The part of commercial buildings that changed the most to keep pace with the latest styles
was the storefront. New designs were frequently incompatible with the design of the building
or were constructed of inexpensive materials that did not have the quality of original storefronts.
However, some remodelings were considered good design in their own right, were executed with
high quality materials and are appropriate for the building.
llUlppropriate signs.
Many times, in a effort to get the attention of the shopper, merchants installed large and
obtrusive signs that neither fit the design of the building nor conveyed a quality image to the
shopper.
I. The Orf&lnal Facad..
The orftlnalltuource
2. Minor Facade 0..,..
:I. More MInor Facade Chance
~I'lo
~III'
~~,.--
~~-
J"rQfl' ~.
~1C6 ~~
~1D~Df"
~-
~~
~.-----
~ SlGtl
~
't'lIO)H ~.--
=r.'!- ~
--
Df'loQuQ ~""
~~ 0#
P"~ ....tOlIIW:''''
5. More Storefront than..
6. Another Storefront
RemodeJln.
7. Drastic Facade Chan,e . The
Orf&lnal Facade Is Gone.
~~
~~cw
'TO ~ Of
~............
4oOUO ,MQSt.~
~~~
WI~............
...
· f1o.VR f1'Q(t" f
~Il"~
r~
r~ ~6'"
,,~~....""
New~
HN4doCHCo ')l6fi;--
HeW
.llPi~ ~
n:o ~f\.V
~r:O!-...-
8
<t. Storefront aemodeDft. -
hade Looks Cut In Half.
teN '~-0I'l'
.~ClHT'
r~
~.""HH...
~f'Nltfr ...
*'f'~
f1'( ". .."....
~.----
~~,....
~~..""
~'fII~
~.
8. The Future . What Direction
Will Future Chan,. Taleel
......t
....-- I
-r'" I
I I
I I
I I
I ? I
I . I
I I
I r----' I
II II
II II
.oW I I
,-"- -- -- - - -1J.
~.::or:::::........... _....
-~-
"-. ~ -. - ------...- .-. .- ., -~.~ - -- -..... - .
STORE WINDOWS
B~kground.
Storefront windows are the largest single element of the traditional storefront design.
Guidelines.
The emphasis should be on transparency. :Being able to see into the building makes it
WanD and inviting to the public and enables the interior to be attractively lit at night.
Office conversions should still retain the traditional storefront design. Eliminating
window space appears as if the building has turned its back on the public.
At ground floor (street) level avoid the use of darkly tinted windows, opaque glass or
mirrored and reflective glass in all storefront designs. These materials and methods are more
appropriate on upper levels of buildings. If sun screening/protection is a factor, the use of
awnings, sun screens or canopies are a more compatible solution.
Unaltered dlspla, window. and transom
lIWmItilliEmdr ,~
IIII
IIII
ClCO
Appropriate
Doors and
Windows
Flush door In,
shop fande
Partially
obscured display
windows
9
DOORS AND FRAMES
When possible, maintain original doors in storefronts Maintain original size and shape
of door openings. If replacement of a door or window is necessary, select a duplicate of the
original and, as a last resort, use one as close to the style of the original as possible. You
should not use flush doors or windows in storefront remodelings or restorations.
In existing buildings' rehabilitation or restorations, the use of wood frames and profiles
better match the original designs. If the use of these materials are not available or are
impractical, other fInishes and metals may be considered if they replicate in profIle, style and
colors the intent of the original design.
DOORS 8
!!11
Appropriate
000 rs
.....:lI
Ibe FroM ',.r
Hlstorfcally. the storefront entry was more than just
a door.la design and appearance reflected Its com-
merdaJ ImportanCe. Tall and stately In proportion.
and built of wood with a large glass panel. the tradI-
tional stOrefront door looked substmtJaJ yet Invit.
In, to the customer.
Original storefront doors along Maln Street have
become scarce.They have been replaced by the stan-
cbrd aluminum and &lass commerdal doon, or by
doon more appropriate to residential buildlngs.AI-
though modern aluminum
doors lack. historic character.
this type of door cannot always
be considered Inappropriate. Its
simple appearance makes It un-
obtrusive. However, If you want
to enhance the personality of
your store. you should consider
other opdons.
I. Your fronc door should be compatible with the
rest of your storefront. Ie should be slp1lRant but
not outspoken.
1. If your storefront retains Its original chanaer. a
tndldonal wood door with a gIus panel (as tall u
possible) will reinforce the bull4fn(it cfestgn.
.
.
lIl.lIIIIlJ
~'~
~ I \\' I
\.U
10
COLORS
BlUkground. Painting can be one of the most dramatic and inexpensive improvements
to a building. Three colors are nonnally sufficient to highlight any facade.
1. The use of one color on every surface should be avoided.
2. Two colors, base and accent, on some buildings may be sufficient.
3. Three colors (tri-color scheme), provides better visual appeal.
In general, select light, cool colors for the main body of the building. White, off-white
and pastels are appropriate. Light colors reflect the heat and are the traditional colors most
frequently used in Florida.
If trim is desired to be highlighted, use a light pastel accent color. Dark or overtly
contrasting colors should be used very selectively. In general, the trim may also be painted
llsing a slightly lighter or darker color tone of the main color.
In some situations, nonnally on smaller, or residential and "Victorian" style buildings,
darker base colors and accent trim colors may be considered for approval.
Bright colors may be used on awnings, as an accent to the light, cool colors of the
building itself. However, garish "electric" or "day-glo" colors should be avoided.
;r01'~:!!toJ'~ - "","oop
II
on
00
11
Minor Trim
Window sash, doors, storefront frames, small details on cornices, window hoods and bulkheads.
Major Trim
Cornice, window caps, window frames, storefront cornices, storefront columns and bulkheads.
Base Color
Wall surfaces and storefront piers.
ORIGINAL FACADES
A .... If Impbisal
Compare these drawings. Nodce how the
remodeling of old facades has destroyed their
continuity. They are no longer visually ded to-
gether because d1elr rhythms and proportions
have been altered. Each facade Is now unre-
lated to the next. and the character of the build-
Ing group suffen. .
REMODElED FACADES
12
SIGNAGE AND IDENTll'lCATION
SIGNS
Commercial signs are a necessary part of the downtown district. However, a balance
must be strock between the need to identify and call attention to individual businesses and the
need for a positive identity and quality image of the entire downtown. Signs should not detract
from the Downtown appearance, they should enhance it. Excessive competition for visibility
from a car has too often resulted in a shopping environment characterized by visual clutter with
oversized, poorly placed and badly designed signs.
Sign Types
Recommended.
The types of signs used should be compatible with the building and storefront as well as
fit the overall character of the Downtown area. Flat wall signs, maIl projecting signs, window
signs, penn anent banners, and awning signs all are appropriate types of signs for Downtown
use. Sign bands above the storefront are another natural location for identifying businesses and
can be found on many older buildings.
Graphics on signs shall be legible and concise. Avoid complex and visually 'busy' signs.
The use of 'logos', corporate or business symbols and identification letters may better
identify the use of a building than complex signage.
Not Recommended.
Freestanding ground signs, roof signs, large projecting signs, internally illuminated
plastic signs, standardized trademark signs (such as national soft drink signs that do not represent
the primary business name), and flashing illuminated signs are generally inappropriate.
Sign Location
Recommended.
Sign placement should be based upon visibility and compatibility with the building and
storefront. Signs should be located logically in relation to the building, not obscuring openings
or building details.
Not Recommended.
Avoid signs which to not fit the building properly, or are placed too high. Signs should
not be placed above the sill of second story windows or 15 feet above the sidewalk line.
13
."- ~.- _ *.. -~-.._._-~- - . .
, '
The number of signs used should be limited to encourage clarity and compatibility with
the building and storefront and discourage visual clutter. Each building should have no more
than three signs witll no more than two different types of signs.
Number of Signs
Recommerukd.
Not Recommended.
Avoid an excessive number and too many varieties of signs, including temporary signs
in display windows.
~ar~~;,~!; '1//-)
ODD
~
I
· DecJde how much )'0'1
wane )'OUr' Ran to ..
It b impolU1lt
to keep 1M
rnasap simple
end to the point.
Ilemember. JOUr
sizn wiD be viO'W'Id
as pan of I .,.,..,
complex emtron-
merit fiIkld wId\
wna.n and
visual messapL .
e Now sup back and taIca
I look tt the color of )'OUI'
buIdq and the colon )"OU
see on the ~ suuciuru. Tab hIna from
these -..hen sMainJ colen for ~.
You will usuaIy lit the bat results If rou ope fer
I simple color scheme . nnae of three c:oIon.
Iwdd prbh. 0Iy-(iI0 colon.
. Qua/Ity of woricrnanship and construcdon is
also a 'f\QJ consideration. A simple. welHnade Ii&n
speaks more hlJhly cI rour
establishment dWl .,
'. '. ~but sloppy
. .. ,
SIGIIS
Sign Types
Sign Location
RECOMMENDED
.mrnttBH
[ffiJrng
timB
. a
. . ... ... ..
" WI I
slp\.
.. ";" Choosu ...
. .' .' . rnaket- c:areful1y: ask to see
sa.rrlpIes of previous WOl'tt.
. Sipu provlded by national dIsa1buun
.... ~ appropriate.They don't reflect the IndMdu-
laky of ~ business and usually appear as acl6-ons
to )"OUt" stOrefront advenlsin:. The sIaN )'OU displq
should adYertist )'OUr pettonoI business rne:ssqe.
.. ... ... ..
000
EEfj
--
NOT RECOMMENDED
Your best ~u.c
. Now conslder this Idea. Your end" bul\dirw
COll\I'IyS 111 Imap mat actS as a sIJn. Your bulIdir1's
appearance Is more subdt dIan I word. ~ or
nc.mbtr IIp\ but k can be man effectMl.
14
AWNINGS AND CANOPIES
Awnings can add to or detract from the character of Downtown depending on the care
and attention given to their design and use. They can highlight a building and cover
unattractively remodeled transom areas above the storefront. Awnings also provide weather
protection for pedestrians and energy conservation for the building. Within the larger
framework of the street they can provide visual continuity for an entire block front. The goal
is to insure that signs and awnings not only enhance the buildings and storefronts of which they
are a part, but also contribute to the overall image of Downtown.
Awning Types and Locations
Recommended.
Awning types, materials, and placement should be carefully coordinated and should be
compatible with the characteristics of the building and other existing conditions along the street.
Standard slanted fabric awnings, whether fixed or retractable, are appropriate for most buildings.
Other shapes, such as boxed or curved awnings, and canopies and marquees may be used if
appropriate. Awnings should be placed within or above storefront openings.
Not Recommended.
Avoid using metal or overly ornate awnings and awnings that are not compatible with the
building and storefront. Size, type and placement of awnings should not interfere with existing
signs, distinctive architectural elements of the building, trees, or elements along the street.
Appropriate Simple Canvas Awnln"
Inappropriate Metal Awnl",. and
Jaloulle Windows
Awning Colors
Recommended.
Awning colors shall be coordinated and compatible with the building and the character
of surrounding buildings. The colors should be part of an overall color scheme; and solid
colors, wide stripes, and narrow stripes are appropriate choices.
Not Recommended.
Avoid using overly bright or 'fluorescent' awning colors and complex patterns that are
not carefully coordinated with the building and storefront.
15
Signs on Awnings
Recommended.
The front panel of an awning may be used as a sign where appropriate. Letters may be
sewn on or silk screened on to the front drop (valance) of an awning when it is a part of an
overa.ll and coordinated scheme.
Not Recommended.
Avoid hand painted or individually made fabric letters that are not professionally applied
to the awning.
· As a visual element. an awning or canopy an add
c:hancter and Intel est to your storefront. You should
think about how it wItl appear In reladon to the scale
of your bulldlnc. How win It affect existing archJtec.
wral (eatureslWUI It owrpoYIef' the proportions of
your windows and facadel Look at nelghborinl build-
Inp an<llrna&fne what Impact the addltJon of an M-
nln& or c:anop)' will have on the dlaracter of the
streetSc:apt.
· Awnings an be
constrUCted from a
variety of materi-
als. Canvas Is tra- ~~
ditlonally popular.
It Is fleK.ble. but
must be weather- '.
treated before In-
staltatJon.Ald1ough
Initial insullatlon
costs are lower
than for other ~-
ning materials. can-
vas may require _
greater mainte-
nance.
. A vinyl awning an be very handsome. If deslzned
with consldendon for the rest of the bullding.Vinyf
Is flexible and aenenlly requires less maintenance
than canvas. On the other hand. vfnylls often very
shiny and thus Inappropriate for many storefronts.
. Awnings and canopies have long been used to dis-
play the names of businesses.
\
If you
choose to
Include a sian
on your
awnlna or
canopy.
keep
the
message
simple and
direct. Signs
an best located on the
rewms (sides) and ~ (flaps) of
awnings and should be atr:ad1ed to the facia of
canopies.
· Make sure the materi:aJ you choose Is guann-.
teed to be weather res1sant. Most awning fabric b
chemically treated to retard deterioration by rain
or snow. With the exception of ahmlnum. most of
the woods and metals used In canoples should be
painted to resist weatherinJ. Sun bleaching Is an-
other problem to conslder.pardcularly when ch0os-
Ing a color for the awnina. '
. Awnings or anopIes :are not appropriate so-
lutions for f!Vef'Y storefront design. However. when
well-deslgned and properly pbced. they an save you
money. spruce up yotJr storefront. and create a pleas-
JIlt sidewalk space for shoppers.
16
OFF-STREET FACADES
Backs of Buildings and Exposed Sides
BlUkground.
Service alleys are important for deliveries, off street access, utility services and other city
functions. The existence of alleys and OC<'.asional vacant property combine to make many
building backs, some sides and rear entrances visible. Some buildings are accessed from alleys.
Guidelines
Rear facades should be clean and well maintained.
A small sign at the rear door should identify the store or building usage.
An awning may be added for visual identification and convenience.
Refuse containers shQuld be hidden with a fence or simple enclosure.
REAR llIlRAICES
~'. , .
Spaces behind bIllIdlc1p, are hquec\tIy bf~
People tend to a'tOkI chem because dIey .,.. usually
unbmpt and ~ Too abn, IhtH Ipac.s
hnw been ccns.Idend stricd1 aenIce IRU, when
deiverIes IN rna~ or prbtat pkIc.ed up.
~. mort and more parIdna ueu In cncI-
donaI business dIstrka .... belnJ cl.vtloped behind
buiIdlnp. In <<he mkIcIe 01 ttM block. 'The badcJ of
!be buI1dInp IN conq Inco Y and open ..
Vleti '10 I!IlQ(
Of'~
This lugests cwo dlIncs:
. The appearance 01 dl' bade aIUI II Imponant
to dle cornrMrdaI district.
. Rear tntranc:a can poundaIIy benefit all busi-
nesses by aIlowlnIlIrect entry from chi partcinI
lot Into lceres. Cusumers don't nMd to ...
around the bIcxk to rudla ~
If )'OU don't have an auncdYe rtar ~ ca
)"DUI' business but an c:cnskIertn& rnakInc Ir~
menu. tfIInk ~ dIeM Issua.
.. YYouId acldltlonaJ waJk-throuaf1 tnIfk htIp or
hkldtr )'OW' business I VVouId a fa/' encnnce be an
added cOf1Wllllence to )'OUI'
C1lSUll1WS'
2. What c:hancts ~ )IOU need to rnaIca to atve
'f04II'lcae an IlInCtf\oe rear ~I How would
lOll handle dlI circulation. displays. and ..curiq
cflrou&hout the bu~
--P~- ,"-
r----,.-'
l'nnr I
l t I
I ~
~~~
~ 4CA~
Q..l..I,N t.r
~~
17
3. AIdlouIh the two ara aIrnlIar, ttM ru,. encranc.
shcluJd not compete with dMt
ltorefront In Imporunc.. In
mon casu. the rear tntrance
sbcdd occupy . reladvely smaI
part 0( cht bade facade and .-
~ more of a udIkatian ct...
awr. SdlI, It should II. maln-
tained and cMveIoped CO fUJlPOl"t
!be JWraI ~ and con-
~ cI <<he cbtric:t.
I'E.M !lft'PNiCe
4. Uat lht aoreftont. the raar eI\try requirss kMn-
lIfkadon. It should be invttlrc and
attnctfyoe. /It. PSi panel In th.
back door b one WIl1 co open
row' Iton to potendaI CJJStOm-
....." smaI Jl&n I)ft or IMIr' the
door Is anodler w., 1X) Idendr)'
row' business. e. sure to keep It
smaI. and don't ck.u.r cht area
wtdt too many lips. An au:nc-
ttte metal &rlh can pnMde 1e-
cur1ty and add to the visual Ip-
pal 0(. nar WllrJ.
If 'fOOl' bulldln& has nar wtndow's on lht vound
lIoor. UIe them lor dispbys: they wi
abo attract people to your door.
An I'Nl'oIn& or lINn canopy can be a
pleasant aodltlon and a conw.
nltnce to shoppers durina in-
dement weather. " there b
;;;
fI"lM1"
Inoulh lun,
planter boxat mlcht abe be
added. but only If you attend to them propIrly.
... - - - .-.
. . ..' . . './
LIGHTING
Background.
In general, lighting on buildings is low in intensity and is used for accenting features,
detailing, ornamentation, and entrances. The other main purposes of building and site lighting
are for building identification, displays, signage and security. Lighting is an important element
in building design. Night appearance of a building needs to be carefully considered.
Guidelines.
Use lighting efficiently and sparingly to highlight display windows, entrances, signs and
architectural detail.
External light sources should be shielded (indirect) and should produce colors which are
as close to daylight colors as possible. Consider lighting that matches the display windows.
Avoid high intensity floodlights or light sources directed at the viewer. Neon is often
inappropriate or overused, but may be used in moderation to accentuate architectural details.
Building storefronts should be lit internally at night for both appearance and security.
\~ ' ./
\ /
\ \:k
([{J{
DETAILS
LIGHTING
GUIDELINES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. INFILL WCATIONS
1. Height.
New infill buildings located in block faces with existing buildings should strive for a
range between 70% and 130% of the average height of strur.tures in the block face to which the
building is oriented. Buildings in excess of 130% of the prevailing height should be stepped
back so the additional height is not visible from the street to which the buildings are oriented.
000
o 0 0 0 0 0 .301'
0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l---~rt(..~~.~~rclll~ .
.-.
BulldlfllS In nditJonaI commercial cHstrlca shan .
similar helaht.lnft1l consD'UCdon should rupect this.
" new faadt that b toO hI&h or law can In~t
this consIsteM quality.
Averap he1cht
11416
~
~~1
I I
qc. 'Mw, I :
." till
2. Building detailing.
+3~
Set back upper noon chat art
createl'than 130" of aoerap
hel&flt
~,
New buildings should contain facade treatments which are varied through the use of
changes in facade plane, scaling, location of windows, doors and other openings, or other
architectural treabnents which modulate the building's appearance. In particular, new buildings
should reinforce horizontal lines established in the surrounding block face. If surrounding
structures do not offer conslStent horizontal elements, the new structure should contain design
elements intended to seIVe as a "transition" between disparate horizontal elements. Horizontal
elements should also distillguisl1 between upper and lower floors of a building in order to
demarcate "public" and "private" space.
CI..poslCMI
The composition of the inflll facade (that is, the or-
ganization of Its parts) should be similar to that of
surrounding facades.
1111111 .1.1 11111111
1111 1111 III III I1l1Jltlll
U I D I
~
tIOT 1ltfi6t!.
Hal WIl.DItO f"'IU'06b
...........ns ., tpea'.
The size and proportion of window and door open-
Ings should be similar to those on surrounding fa.
cades.The same applies to the .-ado of window area
to solid wall for the facade as a whole.
III R"II ~ III
I' . · )0 i::ii
I~~?, R~g ~r n
WALt. "0 'MNQ?l\I FA1to ~
oreNINC:t
"nenlls
An Inflll facade should be composed of materials
that complement adjacent facades. The new build-
ing should not stand out against others.
19
3. Rhythm.
Rhythm is regular or symmetric repetition of building lines, shapes, forms, color,
openings, which relate to overall building proportion and pattern. It also refers to a building's
balance, visual interest and scale in the context of the block face in which it is located.
New construction should replicate the rhythm throughout the block in which the building
is to be oriented in teoos of spacing, facade details, scale, setback, and other appropriate
features. Building materials should be selected to provide a sense of rhythm and human scale;
to generate a pedestrian oriented environment.
...,..
Rhythms that carry throUJhout the block (such as
window spadn&) shoold be incorporated Into the
new facade.
ODD []DD ODD [JOE]
r---'r--~1r---,r---'
II II II I
L--_~,L __ I --_lL___J
'MiOOW 1Uf(TtW\
~~~
4. Setbacks.
III
IIII11
- , 0
New infIll commercial buildings should have a setback relationship to the street consistent
with neighboring buildings and the block face to which the new building is oriented. Generally,
the building line should be maintained at the sidewalk edge to promote both pedestrian interest
and access.
............, .. I....
The new facade's relationship to the street (called
the "setbackj should be consistent with that of Its
neighboring buildings.
~ ~ 1HIf,
..........,;;1
~;... J
.....,.~.
"," ~ NOr. <6e:f'
/~
.... 111I1 ........ fII_
The form of the rocf and bulldlRl cornice should
be similar to those on adjacent structures. On Main
Street. thIs usually means a flat roof hidden behInd
a comics.
20
5. Roof fonns.
Flat roofs shall be surrounded by a parapet of distinctive architectural style. Pitched
roofs may be allowed under certain circumstances, if appropriate within the context of the
streetscape in which the structure is to be located.
6. FaauJe orientation.
The orientation of all new structures shall follow the dominant orientation of structures
along the block face on which the new building is located. For structures on comers or double
frontage lots, multiple facade emphasis shall be given. All new construction projects should give
careful consideration to all exposed building facades.
COMMERCIAL BUILDING ORIENfATlON
-
Qm:: ) (~ ~) (:::::0
noPPI'\OPIUAT!:: !JII: CCIlICDCLU. sn:tlCTUU IS LOCln:n TO T1lE IIACIt or
THE SIn: TO ~ .AIUtIJIG. nus IS "-lIlVITIIIG TO TIlE
,EIlJ:STJUA)l AJlD DJ:TPI0u.n5 TIlE STUET IDCZ
~~EJEt~
Not Recommended
.".,.
APPII0,1\lAn: : THE CXH<<IICLU STNlCTD!\I IS LOCATt::l TO THE f'IUlIIT or
nu: STI\EET cu:ATlIIG A STJIONG ,~ OIUEIlTAt:ON, PAJlXllIC KAt U
LOCATED TO THE SlOE Oil TO nu: IU:AA or TIlE 1I0ILDIIIG
7. LoClltion of off-street parking.
All new construction shall locate the required off-street parking in the interior side yard
or rear yard of the site. No off-street parking shall be located in the front or comer side yards
of the site where the parking is highly viewable from adjoining street rights-of-way.
Parking garages shall be required to provide pedestrian level shops and office spaces not
less than 50 % of the street level facade of the garage structure in order to promote street level
vitality and pedestrian interest. Visual screening or landscape screening shall be incorporated
in the remaining facade areas other than ingress and egress points to screen vehicles from view.
See also parking garage design criteria and requirements contained in Chapter 41, Code of
Ordinances, Division 14. Parking Garages.
21
8. Street kvel vitality.
The street level of new oonstnlction should be designed and oriented to provide for access
by pedestrians and to provide continuity of visual interest in the context of the block face. At
least 50 % of the street level facade of a new building should be transparent (i. e. , glassed doors
or windows). Street level facades may not have blm1k walls which provide very limited visual
interest. Also, opaque, dark-tinted or mirrored glass shall not be used at street level. See also
windows and fenestration.
.... -..w......
.
+
APPROPRIATE: NEW STRUCTURE UTILIZES THE CONTEXTUAL SETBACK AND
HEIGHT OF THE ADJACENT STROCTURE:S AS WELL AS SIMILAR DESIGN
DETAILING AND ORNAMEN~ATION.
9. Additions.
Additions to existing structures should reflect the style, scale, proportion, articulation,
materials and other key features utilized in the existing structure.
Inappropriate: The addition ignores the
style, scale, proportion, and fenestration of
the existing building.
Appropriate: The addition utilizes a
simplified fonn of style and fenestration, as
well as being a sympathetic scale to the
existing building.
.ddItion
9
.
.. tJ
. . .
.,'
. '.
.' . '. J
~o$-.~'
, , . I .. . . '. 'n' :.. . e. .
. ~. '"I . <:>.e <>: '.' " e,
.' . . . . . , .
, ..
+
addlttcn
. :.::]t
1
, .
o
il
.......
COMMERCIAL ADDITIONS
22
NEW BUILDINGS AND DEVEWPMENT
Character-dejining structures.
Downtown Clearwater does not have a dominant architectural theme or style.
Consequently, the design guidelines for Downtown Clearwater should recognize and reflect the
possibility of structures which are not necessarily consistent with existing buildings, but which
establish a new or revised "character" for Downtown. Examples of character-defining buildings
which have been constructed include the Sup'R(.ln1c building, the Clearwater Towers buildings,
the Peace Memorial Presbyterian Church, the East Avenue Post Office, and the Fort Harrison
Hotel. The intent of this section of the design guidelines is to recognize that new, character-
defming structures may be C()nsidered and approved for design compatibility despite the
structure's apparent "incompatibility" with surrounding development. This is intended to be
applied to those structures which may change the character of the surrounding area in a manner
generally consistent with the design guidelines.
Building Categories.
In general, new buildings fall into one of two categories. Those that integrate and blend
into the surrounding environment and those that counteIpOint and become distinctive, stand-alone
expressions of design. Each approach has valid solutions to offer and the City encourages the
explontion of both.
Building designs that blend with other similar styles should emphasize hannony,
continuity, compatible materials and ornamentation.
The buildings that are proposed to be new exprer c;ions of design should still reflect on
the City's past history and values as well as visions for the future. Modem technology buildings
should still incorporate certain design elements, building features and some characteristic
building materials that have been utilized in Clearwater's Urban Center District.
IEW
COlftlUOIOI
23
LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES
LANDSCAPING FOR:MINIMUM LOT LINE BUILDINGS
Most building facades in the downtown district are set on, or only a few feet back from
the public right-of-way. As a result, the space available for landscape improvements is limited.
Space limitations should not discourage owners and tenants from improving their building
environment with plants and foliage. The advantages far out-weigh the challenges imposed by
the limitations. Plants add a human element and soften structural components of a building
through color, texture, sight, and smell.
Space limitations for both new buildings and buildings being remodeled can be enhanced
by recessing entries or offsetting facades in imaginative ways that comply with the architectural
guidelines.
Also, public right-of-way landscaping, where pennitted, that accentuates the building
features, and adds to the pedestrian and human scale is encouraged. It should carry out the
overall theme of the street and surrounding areas into a unified design. The application of
accepted principles of landscape architecture are encouraged.
PLANTERS
1. lnground - On Grade Pltmters.
On grade planters require removal of paving materials, addition of soil amendments, and
. insta1lation or irrigation. Installation of a concrete curb is necessary to keep soil and mulch in
the planter.
2. lnground - Reltded Planters.
Raised planters do not require complete excavation of paving materials but some method
of drainage is required. Planters in general should be 18 to 24 inches high along the building
facade and constructed in a style and of materials which complement the architectural style of
the building. Acceptable materials are concrete blocks with stucco fInish, brick, and wood.
3. Portable Planters.
Movable planters shall be "Mediterranean" style or heavy duty pre-cast concrete or
traditional, decorative metal designs because clay and fiberglass planters tend to crack. The
colors of the planters should be either neutral in color or be present in the surrounding
architecture. All pre-cast planters should be connected to an automatic, timed irrigation system.
The City of Clearwater has adopted certain styles to promote and maintain streetscape continuity.
24
PLANT MATERIALS AND CARE
The choice of plant materials is varied and depends on the amount of sun or shade
available and personal preference. Plants should be drought tolerant and non-toxic. They should
not have thorns or shaIp points and should not be overly aggressive in terms of growth habit.
Xeri-scaping design proposals are also encouraged.
The kinds of plants and planters chosen must complement the architecture of the building.
Utilize the materials, colors, tones and textures of the building when choosing planters.
The location of plants and planters should be carefully planned. They should not hide
windows or special architectural elements, nor should they crowd entrances or pedestrian traffic.
Do not create hazards to pedestrians or restrict visibility of motor vehicles.
Maintenance of plants and planters is required. Planters should be cleaned and painted
as required. Damaged planters should be repaired or replaced. Plants should be well watered,
fertili7-OO, pruned, and sprayed for pests.
~
. , .
25
-. ~ <- ,-' ~---- .---- - - - ~ - - -~,~ .
, ,
STREETSCAPE DESIGN
Street Corners. Whenever feasible, the development of pedestrian spaces at street
corners is encouraged. Where possible, the use of a curb 'neck-out' which creates larger
pedestrian areas that incorporate benches, specialized pavers, lighted bollards and trash
receptacles are recommended. Landscaping, including shade trees, should be used to provide
separation betw~n people and vehicles.
Mid-Block. Large developments have the opportunity to incorporate landscaping, special
paving materials and other pedestrian accents at their mid-block. These needn't be as extensive
unless they are to serve as an official pedestrian crossing area.
Entrances. An integral part of the streetscape program is to encourage the introduction
of streetscape elements such as brick and block pavers, planters and landscape materials into the
entryways of buildings and by using building facade materials in the construction of streetscape
improvements.
SEATING AREA
. BENCHES
. TRASH RECEPTACLE
LIGHTED BOUARDS
CONCRETE
BAND WI ROO<
SALT FINISH
,,~
SPECW..1ZED
PAVING
(I
....
/.: t-'
. ~
,... i'
LANDSCAPING
. SHADE TREES
. lOW-GROWlNG SHRUBS
. FLOWERING GROUND COVER
Typical Street Corner Design
.-,.1Mf ............ - "'q ___ '"'1'.
--.._....-r...."-.,
...,.... -...... .-......-.
., ...... .....
Entrances $ Mid-Block
26
Open Spaces. Designers of site improvement areas are encouraged to explore
opportunities to incorporate usable open space within the project (development) area. A variety
of both active and passive spaces such as courtyards and plazas are desirable. These may be
either part of the general, visual pedestrian movement areas or also private, people oriented,
quiet spaces. When designing these spaces careful consideration should be given to site
conditions such as sun, wind, rain and the effect of adjacent buildings, where applicable.
Attention should also be given to opportunities afforded by building roof-tops. Open
spaces located on roof gardens for employees and building users may provide a unique
atmosphere and desirable views of Clearwater Harbor, Clearwater beach areas and other scenic
views.
Artwork. Sculptures, murals, banners, water features and other artwork are encouraged
to be integrated within the streetscape design to provide focal points, aesthetic interest and
pedestrian interaction.
-~
~
Open Spaf;e Utilizatio"
27
STREET FURNISHINGS & EQUIPMENT
Street furnishings are a very important element to a successful streetscape environment.
Furnishings need to be attractive, pedestrian-friendly, durable and in character (in hannony) with
the overall theme of the Urban Center District.
The incorporation of benches, trash receptacles, planters, telephone kiosks, bollards,
bicycle racks and other street furnishings are encouraged. However, the use of these equipment
items must be carefully planned so not to congest space limitations, be coordinated to harmonize
with other City street furnishings and be maintained on a continuing basis so that they do not
become deteriorated. All street furnishings must be permanently anchored.
Benches. The preferred style of benches are traditional metal with full backs and either
durable wood or metal slats. It is recommended that benches have both end and intermediate
(mid-point) armrests.
Seating Walls. The construction of seating walls through-out the district are encouraged.
These features increase seating and landscape opportunities and also provide for incorporating
building elements and materials such as brick, pre-cast concrete, ceramic tile and other finishes
into the streetscape.
Trash Receptacles. Trash receptacles should blend with other street furnishings, be
constructed of metal with traditional exterior design, equipped with a removable trash liner
(container) and be sufficient in size not to require constant servicing. The design should be
compatible with those in Coachman Park and other Urban Center District locations.
Metal Planters. Matching metal planters that blend with trash receptacles may be used
to add flowers and foliage to the streetscape if space limitations won't permit built-in planters.
U\d 1::'
~ Mot'r)
,. f,ilIUi ~
Benches
'Q
~
~.,...""" j
I' Trash Receptacles
l _4
.~
28
Bollards. The use of lighted bollards, at approved locations, add a distinctive, pedestrian
oriented feature to site developments. They also provide pedestrian protection, street defInition
and attractive night lighting. Metal or pre-cast concrete finishes are the most durable.
Bicycle Racks. The use of bicycle racks in larger scale developments is encouraged.
They must be well constructed and permanently anchored, blend with other street furnishings
and located so not to create a pedestrian hIl7.atd.
Newspaper & Other Sidewalk Enclosures. All new sidewalk enclosures and newspaper
dispensing machines shall be consistent with other development materials. Publication names
may be applied; however, no extraneous advertising will be permitted. All enclosures and
dispensing machines must be located as not to impede pedestrian traffic and must be pennanently
anchored to the ground. Chains and other strapping devices will not be pennitted. Additionally,
any street comer must be limited to three enclosures.
Urban Center District Plaques. It is the intent of the Downtown Partnership to utilize
cast bronze plaques to identify and symbolize the redevelopment efforts of the District. These
plaques will be installed at strategic locations in sidewalks and on approved building facades to
help promote overall District continuity.
J
. I
ffiw\IIi:fI
W rod
ItZl' tU ... UI'-
IIl'U ~
..... ~ 11m
Bicycle Racks
~~
!
'..
';'
1-.__ ________-J
tI. DCA.
UCIIfT .ouIlCII
~
,
~IOHB""'"
IIfJRlIUAtW:a DCCI!P1'
'..... NOftD COt.Ilft....
IMOOTH ......H '0"
INCUAUD "IPUCltVlTY
nnATlON INORm
I
niVAT10ff ,wOn
I 1
I \1
1 I
'-_ _ .J
~CT IUft fOOT'Nl
".'T ...
lUlL
P,destrimt-u:Dlcd 14hl Fixtun
NOIITH v.w
Lighted Bollards
29
PROJECT EVALUATION ANALYSIS
Applications ftled for review by the City of Clearwater Design Review Board will
undergo a project evaluation analysis as part of the overall review process. The purpose of the
analysis will be to help detennine the overall consistency of each application with respect to the
City's adopted Design Guidelines.
A range of points have been established for numerous elements of the guidelines. These
sets of points give an indication of the relative value of the elements and their importance to the
overa.1l guidelines. There is no mandated or required minimum point total. The analysis is an
indication of how each application compares to the overall intent of the Design Guidelines.
The total maximum point count for New Building and Development Proposals is 300
points. The total maximum point count for In-fill Construction, Building Additions and Facade
Alterations is 200 points. The total maximum point count for Signs and Signage is 100 points.
The Central Pennitting Department, Design Review Section, will perfonn an evaluation
on submitted final applications for City design review. This will be part of the staff review and
report to the Board. All reviews and evaluations are intended for Board infonnation and
assistance and may be modified or revised by the Board as part of the applicant presentation
process conducted during the Design Review Board meetings.
Board approvals or denials will be based on confonnity with the Design Guidelines and
not by a numerical score. See the breakdowns of the evaluation analysis for each of the three
categories on the following pages.
NEW BUILDINGS & DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ............. TOTAL 300
- mSTORY OF PROJECT SITE .................................. 25
Perform Historical Analysis of Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Incorporate Historically Significant Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
-SI"fB DE'VaOP~"T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Thorough SitelProject Analysis ....................... 10
Preservation of Important Site Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IS
IncotpOration of Open Spaces ........................ 10
Pedestrian Related/Oriented Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Continuity with Existing City Elements .................. 10
Introduction of New Site Amenities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
-LANDSCAPE AND STREBTSCAPE DESIGN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Tree Preservation and Planting ....................... 15
Landscape Plan & Materials .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Streetscape Design & Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Streetscape FumishingslEquipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
- PARKING AND PROPERTY ACCESS ............................. 20
Site Access & Identification/Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
I..ocation of Parking Areas .......................... 10
Any Proposed Shared Parking Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
eBUDUDINGOIDrnNTATION ......t..t....................t..... 20
Relationship to Site & Views . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Relationship to Neighboring Developments ................ 10
-BUDUDING(S) DESIGN ELEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 100
Massing, Scale & Proportion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Relationship to Nearby Buildings ...................... 10
Open Spaces & Fenestration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Building Materials & Finishes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Character Deftning Structures ........................ 15
Colors ...................................... 15
Lighting, General, Accent & Site ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Signage & Building Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
-OVERAlL DESIGN COMMUNITY IMPACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Q
300
31
;l"'~ '.. "
lNFILL CONSTRUCTION, BUILDING ADDmONS
& FACADE ALTERATIONS ....................,....... TOTAL 200
. mSTORY OF PROmCT SITE ,.,...."....,............,....... 25
Perfonn Historical Analysis of Location . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . 10
Retain or Restore Historically Significant Elements .. . . . . , . . . . 15
-SITE DEVaOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Preservation of Site Amenities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . , . . . 5
Incorporation of Open Spaces ..,."...."....,..."... 5
Pedestrian Related/Oriented Elements ......,..".....,.. 10
. LANDSCAPE AND STREBTSCAPE DESIGN . . . , , . . . . , . . . . . , . . , . . . . . , 30
Tree Preservation & Planting .........,.....,......... 5
Landscape Plan & Materials ...., . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . , , . . 10
Streetscape Design &. Features . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . 10
Streetscape Furnishings/Equipment , , . . . . . , . . . , , . . . . . . . . . 5
. PROPERTY ACCESS AND PARKING .,......,....,......, , . . . . . , . 15
Site Access & Identification .....,.........."........ 5
Improvements to Existing Parking . , . . . . . , , . . . , , . . . . . . . . 10
. PROJECTIBUILDING DESIGN . . . . . . . , , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , 100
Massing, Scale &. Rhythm .....,.....,.....,..."... 10
Adjacent Buildings Relationship . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , , . . . 10
Removal of Inconsistent Existing Elements ............,... 10
Storefronts, Doors & Windows Treatment, . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 15
Colors & Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Lighting, General & Accent ...".....,....,....,.... 1 0
Signage & Identification , . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . , . . . 10
Awnings & Canopies ........,....,......,....,... 10
Off-Street Facades .... . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
-OVERALL DESIGN COMMUNITY IMPACT. . . , . . . , , . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . 1Q
200
32
..,.J~.. '., '> .
SIGNS AND SIGNAGE ................................. TOTAL 100
-HISTORY OF PROJECT SITE .................................. 10
Investigate Past History of Proposed Site .................. 5
Incorporate Historically Significant Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
-SIGNAGB COORDINATION ................................... 20
Removal of Inconsistent & Non-Confonning Signs ........... 10
Coordination of All Project/Site Signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
-SIGNAGB DESIGN ......................................... 50
Proper Size, Proportion & Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Continuity with Building's Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Simplicity, Clarity & Concise Message .................. 10
Lighting Methods & Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Colors & General Appearance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
-SIGNAGB LOCATION ....................................... 15
Sign Placement on Building & Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Restrict Quantity of Signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Good Building Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
,
;>;
- OVERALL DESIGN COMMUNITY IMPACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
100
33
"
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING - AGENDA
Tuesday, DATE -, 1996
The City of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA).
Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special accommodations.
CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, ANY INTRODUCTIONS
A. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS - DATE-
FOR EXTERIOR BUilDING PlANS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, BUILDING ADDITIONS, FACADE
ALTERATIONS, SIGN PlANS AND SIGNAGE, THE BOARD FOLLOWS THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED
BelOW.
1. The Chairperson reads the title of the submitted application as it is presented.
2. The staff report and pertinent background information are presented concerning the application.
3. Staff presents any supporting or cpposing written documents/correspondence.
4. The applicant or his representative makes their presentation to the Board..
6. Public Input - in support or opposition, is presented.
6. The applicant has an opportunJty for final summary or comment.
7. Discussion by the Board.
8. The Board makes a decision.
*Please file a written request at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you wish to request more than 10
minutes to make your presentation.
B. REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION, DEFERRED AND CONTINUED ITEMS:
C. REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND REVISED PROPOSALS:
D. NEW PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN REVIEW:
E. CHAIRMAN'S ITEMS
F. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS
G. BOARD AND STAFF COMMENTS
H. ADJOURNMENT
DAB AGENDA
CLEARWATER
DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS
The Clearwater Design Guidelines are an illustrated version of the Clearwater Land
Development Code, Section for Design Review (Code of Ordinances, Section 36.038). TheSt
guidelines provide text and illustrations depicting examples of the key design review criteria
contained in the ordinance and some examples of appropriate and inappropriate designs,
alterations, building additions, and streetscape improvements. The primary objective of the
Design Review ordinance is to ensure that new development, building additions, facade
alterations, rehabilitations and signage are compatible with the neighborhood thereby reinforcing
and upgrading the quality of the area and preserving property values.
DESIGN REVlE\V PROCESS
The design review process is intended to be applicant friendly, solution oriented and expedient.
Most staff reviews will nonnally take seven to ten days. Larger scale projects may take up to
forty-five days to allow coordination with other City design review procedures. Design review
applications are to be submitted to the Central Pennitting Department's Design Review Section.
Pre-application meetings with the staff are strongly recommended prior to submitting a flOal
application. Once a completed application is received, the staff will review the project for
compliance with the review criteria and prepare a staff report for the Design Review Board. It
is recommended that applications be submined prior to the time the project is submitted for
building penn it review. No building or signage pennits, in the designated districts, will be
issued until a proposal has been reviewed and approved by the Board.
The flow chart depicted on page 38 outlines the steps in the design review process.
Only the property owner (applicant) or the owner's designated representative may rue an appeal.
The applicant must submit a written request for an appeal within 10 calendar days of the Design
Review Board decision. The appeal is to the City Commission which then will conduct a public
hearing. See under" Appeals."
DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURES
Basic design review procedures are as follows:
1. Design review hearings will be conducted by the Design Review Board.
2. Developments that are inconsistent with the ordinance and the design review
criteria identified in these guidelines will be denied.
3. The Central Pennitting Director or his designee will collect any fees, review
meeting dates and times, review submittal requirements, and prepare as
appropriate illustrations and/or a design manual to facilitate understanding of the
intent of the design guidelines.
35
4. Approval:
a). Design review approval is valid for a period of twelve (12) months from the
date of approval. The Design Review Board may grant up to a one (1) year
extension, provided the project meets the design guidelines current at that
time.
5. Modifications:
a). Any request for modification to a design review application previously
approved by the City shall be subject to fees, review and approval in the
same manner as a new application.
SUBMITI'AL REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN REVIEW
All submitted applications must include ten (10) complete sets of all drawings and photographs
for review and evaluation. Artist's renderings may also be utilized and are encouraged for large
projects and new development proposals.
1. For new developments and building additions:
a). A scaled site plan or survey of the project site showing building layouts and
orientation. Also provide a landscape plan with paved areas, walks, parking, any
buffer walls, streetscape improvements and other pertinent information. The site
plan shall also show the properties on both sides of the project with the location
of all the buildings on those adjacent properties. Photographs of the adjoining
buildings/properties are recommended to be submitted.
b). Scaled elevations depicting architectural details, building materials, and colors of
all building facades that may be seen (exposed). For building additions also
include color photograph of the principal building or buildings.
2. For building rehabilitations. walls and fences. awnings and canopies:
Scaled elevations depicting architectural details, building materials, and colors of
the building facades that face streets, alleys and courtyards with a detailed written
description of the proposed work.
3. For building signage and identification. freestanding signs and banners:
a). Scaled elevations and/or photographs depicting architectural and signage details,
materials, colors, sizes and dimensions, location and quantity of signs and/or
identification letters, symbols and banners.
b). Provide visual and written material indicating in detail the type and method of
lighting or illumination.
c). A written statement regarding the intent of the installation of the signage or
identification; indicate whether it is pennanent, temporary, seasonal or other use.
36
~I~
APPEALS
The appeal process shall be as outlined in Section 36.065, Code of Ordinances:
I. The City Manager or their designee shall withhold issuance of any building or
signage permits until the appeal is resolved.
2. Appeal of the Design Review Board decision is to the City Commission. An
appeal must be flIed by the property owner (applicant) or the owner's designated
representative in writing to the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of the
decision date along with the appropriate fee as determined by the City Clerk.
The appeal shall outline the basis of the appeal and shall provide justification for
the proposed relief. The City Commission shall set a date and conduct 'a public
hearing as set forth in Section 36.065.
For further infonnation and assistance, please contact the Design Review Section of the Central
Permitting Department located on the second floor of the City Municipal Services Building.
37
CLEARWATER
.
DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS
SUBMIT APPLICATION
CENTRAL PERMITTING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW
APPLICANT MEETING(lF REQUESTED)
10 DAYS
PROJECT PRESENTATION
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
15 DAYS
to
30 DAYS
APPROV AL
DENIAL
OBTAIN PERMITS
CENTRAL PERMITTING
DEPARTMENT
REVISE/REHEAR
I
.
,
t
I
I
~ 10 DAYS
I.TJ TO FILE
PROJECT COMPLETION
CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE
r-----------------J---------------,
I .
l APPEAL :
I .
! CITY COMMISSION :
L_________________________________~
60 DAYS
.- . ~ -'-- - -- --- - -. .
. .' ,
~ The Design Review Board
.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
.
The fonnulation and preparation of these Urban Center District Design Guidelines were
made possible with the assistance and cooperation of the many individuals, committees and
organizations who have provided both text and graphics.
The following is a list of the organizations whose members were major contributors to
this effective document for the City of Clearwater:
~ The Clea.IWater Downtown Partnership
The Cttamber of Commerce
The City of Clearwater
The Community Redevelopment Agency
The Downtown Clearwater Association
The Downtown Development Board
~ The Design Committee & Design Group of the Downtown Development Board
~ The Clearwater Historical Society
~ The Plaza Parkway & Neighborhood Design Review Programs
City of St. Petersburg, Florida
~ The National Main Street Center, Washington, D.C.
. The National Trust for Historic PreselVation, Washington, D.C.
The fmal printing and graphics were provided by the Graphics Communications Division,
Infonnation Management Department, City of Clearwater.
""- . . - .-------._.~ ~ # .~.... p-,.._~ ~- - .-
, ' .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
.
CITY COMMISSION - 1995
Rita Ganrey, Mayor
Sue Berfield, Vice Mayor
Bob Clark:
J. B. Johnson
Fred Thomas
CITY COMMISSION - 1996
Rita Garvey, Mayor
Bob Clark
Ed Hooper
J. B. Johnson
Karen Seel
CITY MANAGER
Eli711beth M. Deptula
"':;'
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1995
Art Shand, Chaitperson
William McCann, Vice Chairperson
MacArthur Boykins
Robert Herberich
Mary Mavronicolas
Kate McCullough
Kathy Milam
"
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1996
William McCann, Chairperson
Kathy Milam, Vice Chairperson
MacArthur Boykins
Mark Cagni
Robert Herberich
Alex Plisko
CENTRAL PERMITfING DEPARTMENT
Scott Shuford, Director
Don McCarty, Design Review
40
. ,
~ '
, .,
, '
, , 01' ' ,',
, , '~... .
_,__,____.______,~_J_",~, ____.__,_ ..".",.___.:,__,..." . _,_,___, _~,,__ ___~_.._~_._.. ,_,,___~__.._.,,___- ",--- -." -- ...,
Item #
r;tl3
CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION ').r;
Agenda Cover Memorandum J '\ Meeting Date
( --.-J
6. ~. 9 ~
SUBJECT: Landmark Drive Right-or-Way dedication
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION: Adopt Resolution Number 96-33 officially dedicating the Westerly 40 feet of a
portion of City owned property, in Section 33, Township 28 South, R"mge 16 East, as Lalldm~lrk Drive Right-of-
Way,
I X I and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
· The proposed Right-of-Way is needed for the Southerly extension of Landmark Drive, South of Enterprise Drive East.
. The City obtained the property in 1991 for the Landmark Drive extension project.
. The Westerly 40 feet will be used as Right-of-Way, while the balance of the land will be used for water quality
treatment.
Reviewed by:
legal --rS-
,/
Budget N/A
Purchasing N/A
Risk Mgmt. N/A
IS N/A
ACM tJC,~
ENG. //l
OTHER 'r N/A
Originating Copt,
Costs:
N/A
Commission Action
Engineering Department
(Current FY)
Approved
User Copt.
Funding Source:
Approved
w/conditions
Copt, Imp,
Denied
Subl11ttod By:
City Manllgur Y"~
LANDMRK1.AGN
Advortlsed:
Date:
Paper:
Not required: X
:,(\, Afflicted porties
notifiud
Not Required X
Operating
Co nt' d to
Other
Appropriation Code Is)
Attachments:
ROBolution No, 96-33
loclltion Map
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
DEDICATING CERTAIN PROPERlY lOCATED IN SECTION 33,
TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE 15E, AS PUBLIC RIGIiT-OF-WA Y AND
AS A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT; DESIGNATING THE
PROPERTY AS LANDMARK DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY:
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater is the owner of the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to dedicate a portion thereof as a public right-of-way or as a
public utility easement; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLQRIDA:
Section 1.. The property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, is hereby dedicated as
right-of-way and as a utility easement for use by the general public and the City of Clearwater as
their interests may appear. The property shall be designated as Landmark Drive Right-of-Way.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution in the public records
of Pine lias County, Florida.
Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
.1996.
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and legal
sufficiency:
c-y:::::::' ~ ~ -
Jonfi Ca;;;s
Assistant City Attomey
Attest:
-
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
, );
E}(HIBIT "A"
l
LANDMARK DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY DESCRIPTION FOR M&B 22-0111 IN SEe
33-29-15
The West 40 feet of the North 160 feet of the West 330 feet of
the following described tract:
BEGIN at the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 of section 33, Township 28 South, Range 16 East,
the same being the Northwest corner of Shady Oak Farms, as shown
on the Plat Recorded in Plat Book 80, Pages 95 and 96 of the
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence run North
00001'46" East, 669.19 feet along the West boundary line of said
Northwest 1/4; thence run South 89030'48" East, 625.02 feet;
thence run South 00001'46" West 665.47 feet; thence run North
89051'15" West, 625.00 feet along the South boundary line of said
Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, the same being the North
boundary line of said Shady Oak Farms, to the POB. Less and
except the North 10 feet of the East 10 feet thereof.
LEQALS.WJS
w
>
0:::
o
NOTE: This IS not 0 survey!
40'
N 89030'48" W
625.02'
w 3:
to to
v -.;t
~
0 ..-
. 0
0 0
0 0
0
z If)
~
0:::
<(
~
(:)
Z
<(
.-J
160'
M&B
22-0111
\O~.J~
I"
-.;t
If'i
to
to
330'
0)
~
0)
co
co
N 89'51'15" W
625.00'
SW cor of NW 1/4 of NW 1/4
of See 33- 28-16, also
NW cor of Shady Oak Forms
P.B. 80, Pages 95 & 96
P.D.B.
Novo
6/95
EER
RUN
N
"
... ,.,
I
l~,'O: I
I
i
I
I
I
l__
J~
..h. t,
":"..- '-----~~--.-.. ';-~---..- - .~-_..~ "
/ /1', Y II /' ')..~/_" / lJ,~""\. "
", "..') / ':~' '-, /1 '.
~ (/' ".~ 0 "'" /' ",>" -.I, II
'6 (~O~~: ,,/ 'P,'tr- '""',,,/ I~ /'" '(9
I~ :'~ '-? / J ",,,,,/,t /
>- I ~ ^ " // \..., II>
,. >- J 14 ~ J ..
<
. \3 ~ 4 1J · Il ~ V . 0.... / "\
& " '2 ~ ~ .2 ;:;-- V 1 \
Hc).-- g f--<D>-- ~ !--<n-- ~ · o?-O -l. ~ \....('v,,~
. I, Q . ">- 6 11 0
~ 0 11 I 19
1 \0 12 1 '0:::: 7 'a ~ - 1 r) 6 '11
V1 0 0 12 / \
~ ~ - I. I~ I. 11 I 16
. a II a 11,.1 '6
S I 17 \
SWEETGUM WA Y
"
"
r--
III
-
,~
'5
\..--
1 AS TLAN[j
BLVD
-,-
J1/01
1~/06 ,~
~
Z >-__,...
j I
a J'/nll I
~ i
JJ(02
d
t
,,1 \) \ \, 2 J ,I ~ I 6 7
1& \ 14 \ \,~ 1:0 2) 121 I 21 120
m \O~ER ,
~
al~
'''le
11
16
I~
i I
l'~ ~
/ " ILl -11
,i..'''-o JJ/03
" I 12\'~"
'J I
I
I
,. I
j
l !
.1J/OO
-,
J:-1
I
10
11
1:\
I~
-
,~
\
'-
o
--'-'-'-
)"/O~
I
RUN
S.
J I · I ~
II
7 .
10
EN1[RPRISE
ROA:;
EAST
~
.Jl
-
2
-
J
-
~ '/. ~
P:ARKC::K O~:~ :- ~~ ~'/I~ - :
29 12 1j @ <(
J ! J I'~ . _ II / 6
~~ '{' " ~
. 2e HILLCREEK CIR N '\ :;:
-'
Z=IC4
11/0.1
22/04J
= If~~'
"' J
0:
v ~l
;'1;01
---
t L.. _---'
l----,
:: ':"
.1,
-
5
-
-0-
7
-
. ~
-<
II
-
10
,---
1\
'6
~
27
o
z
o
CD
20
111
...
l/l
0{
w
1~
/
,
iDedication
Site
-
IX
.....
U
2:
'<
o
2:
;::)
VI
.
1.1
~
<(
a
~I
r--
~~ ) 22 --;-;- w
2' U Ie d
0;
,~ I~ ru
"1 I~
'e
16
12/012
~" LJ
~ 30
29
I~
6
2e
Z2/01\\
:!II
(a '0
"
22 IOl~
2' :c:
1e
z;::;)!
o
61
Q:\
TT':)-;:-.
L--L. ~_" ~,
[I001t-1
r--;-;-:--
i r.o ; ~91 ~ ; ~..
I
:7
:!11
12
'0
"
9
--
10
Ig
12
----
"
SABER
20
~-
:::01\
21
2~
\
~
2
>--
..
~
)J
~I
v
23 I
I
2' I
" I I
";04
~
Q:
01::
~
o
Z
01::
-'
I
I
\
8 \ 1 \ 61 ~ I '~., II~ _~u-;n-.--l r~-r),; '): ):
~, OA, HilL R0Au ~ ,/~ .:: I 1,-. --,-.. "
..... --..--~-------- -- ~ 0
~r' 2 J i' l~ i 6 .: . '71, ~ g L/;' ,,/ ~.T.:
<{ C}... - ==" -[ 1 " >--- I/~ '
-J 12 II ri 10 II II ,: :: ~J-;- ~ 1 ' I..: .
f--- 10 J ~ 0::
'2 Wi; , e Qr---Jj
~ ~ D,AK I COV~~) I DRIVE -, --:'r~p]>-- ~!_..J~, i ~,
: ':, ~:=',~ ,;. : ',' '7'!~ , iF:;-- -
'----,~ ':\"~'\-=-o~ .,,~W ~~:q ~ -;\\ ~~T~:
) <{ ~ J llJ -' l....l_,.
-- -' 1. 1 w1t.lr-1';"c
/~~[j/:':~l,D'.{-:C 'l'll
1
L.____. ___.__..__
! !
.1
~
~l
.1~
\2
2'
~!
w'
0;'
~I
:x:
,J
>-
~
:r
>-
z
<(
~O
J
~ .
SUNsmEJ~
~
S
I ~ ~I---
~w 6
~i 1 I a
~!l.
.
W
.---t U
36 J. I ~ 2S
.17 J ~
\ JlJ I \ 26
~M~ "j:\"
gl,O l"t'2 'J I.
.. I
Ii
.
KI-
~
~
t
~ 10
is f--
II
.2
I.
t--
,1
1~ 1,6
f---
7
~
HILLCREEK CIRCLE S
"I,e 11 I 16 t,~
"
1.1
':
11 1'0
./., 8
""-..
~ "',,-
2J/Ol
o 0 0.\15 PAAt(
I
\ I
I,
Ii
32/01
l= I ~~
~:; ',..,' ," , , : . " "", , '" ", ' ~' , / " . , " ,'. 1
.' , '.',." ,"', '''''''''-l,,'., . , .~._~----~
. ---=---~-~------------:-_~~
C\k:i-
FOR COMMISSION MEETING
May 2. 1996 APPOINTMENTS
Agenda # ;;) ~
APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET
BOARD Airport Authority
TERM: 4 Years
APPOI NTED BY: City Commission
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Not required
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater
Special Qualifications: None (5097-91)
MEMBERS: 5
CHAIRPERSON: Charles Silcox
MEETING DATES: 1st Wed., 3:00 p.m.
PLACE: Chambers
APPTS. NEEDED: 1
DATE APPTS TO BE MADE: 5/2/96
Name
Date of Original
Appointment
Attendance
Record
Interest in
reappointment
1
,
,
~
;
i
,l
\
i
\
"
i:
~
(
THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) SEA T(S) NOW REQUIRE EITHER
REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE.
1. Vacant Seat - Theresa Goss resigned
THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE
VACANCIES:
Name-Address
Comments-Related Experience. Etc.
1. William Andres
1304 S. Evergreen Ave., 34616
Retired Lab Director
2. Robert Lunt
833-C Keene Rd. N., 34615
prior work (15 yrs) w/Cessna Aircraft
Co.,current work w/aircraft sales & mgmt
3. Mike Palouian
1320 Summerlin Dr., 34624
past member Parks & Rec Board
4. H. Virginia Robinson
1005 Amble Ln., 34615
Nurse, Red Cross Volunter
5. Dennis Roper
995 Lake Forest Rd.,34625
past member this board
6. Francis J. Werner
1845 Seton Dr., 34623
Past President & Treasurer of a homeowner's
association
Zipcodes of current members on board:
1 at 34615
1 at 34624
2 at 34625
1 vacant
'{ ,
cJ k d...
APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET
;)5
FOR COMMISSION MEETING May 2.1996 APPOINTMENTS Agenda #_
BOARD: Beautification Committee
TERM: 4 years
APPOINTED B'Y: City Commission
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Not Required
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater
SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: None
MEMBERS: 9
CHAIRPERSON: William Baldwin
MEETING DATES: 1 st Wed., 9:00 a.m.
PLACE: Annex
APPTS. NEEDED: 2
DATE APPTS TO BE MADE: 5/2/96
Name
Date of Original
Appointment
Attendance
Record
Interest in
reappointment
::!
"
i
~
-~
\\
!~
.(
~
~
--
~
.,
[;.
.-
~
THE FOllOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND
NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A
NEW APPOINTEE.
1. Vacant Seat (Pam Fleming resigned 9/95 - moved)
,
,i
t
~
,
!
I
I
!
I
I
.
I
i
i
2. Vacant Seat (Barbara Bickerstaffe resigned 4/1/96)
THE FOllOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE
ABOVE VACANCIES:
Name-Address
Comments-Related Experience,Etc.
1. Robert Sudalnik
2021 Oakdale Way, 34615
Computer Executive
Zipcodes of current members:
2 at 34621
1 at 34624
4 at 34630
2 vacant
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau. City Cler@
SUBJECT: Follow up from April 29, 1996 Work Session
COPIES: Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager
DATE: April 30, 1996
In response to questions raised at the April 29, 1996, Work Session the following answers
are provided in final agenda order.
Item #15 - Sho Drawings for Pier 60 park: T ~Iier to be used for the work by
Post, Buckley, Shuh and rnigan is 2.96.
Item #21 - Memorial seway loge: The cost of the SEIR Study is $743,668 plus a
$115,521 (20%) contingency. vel of contingency is standard for this type of study. Thus
falj none of the contingency ha een ent. To upgrade to a full NEP A PD&E study will cost
$39,400. Subtracting thi amount fr the existing contingency leaves a contingency of
approximately $76,000 The Resolution reg qting State Funding is in the agenda pack. County
and State Funding wi be added to the investigatiOn,pf funding listing.
-..
cJte~> Beautification Committee: Information regarding whether the Committee
believes 7 members are sufficient will be provided after the Committee meets on Wednesday
morning.
Miscellaneous(nol on this 0
ans has served one two year term on
Item 1128 - Economic evelopment Council:
this council (5/94 to 5/96).
DOT Signs - Rich Baier w' quest the sign at 510 Cleveland Street be moved out of the
trees. He will ask Clearwater adde to the northbound sign coming out of 51. Petersburg.
,/
#.. - - -. ~ --- ,--- ---
. .
FOR COMMISSION MEETING May 2. 1996
Agenda #_
;<0
CJ~
APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET
BOARD: Design Review Board
TERM: 4 years
APPOINTED BY: City Commission
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater
STAFF LIAISON: Central Permitting
MEMBERS: 7
CHAIRPERSON: William McCann
MEETING DATE: 2nd & 4th Tuesdays
PLACE: Chambers - 3 p.m.
APPTS. NEEDED: 1
DA TE APPTS TO BE MADE: 5/2/96
SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: Three members lone per area) shall be property owners or merchants
within the affected areas IClearwater Beach, Downtown Clearwater, and the North Greenwood
commercial district); two shall be design professionals O.e., architects, landscape architects,
engineers, or urban planners); and two shall be "At-Large".
THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERIS) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW
REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW
APPOINTEE.
Name
Date of Original
AppointlJ1ent
Attendance
Record
Interest in
reappointment
1. Vacant Seat - - Mary Mavronicolas resigned
Area Property Owner or Merchant - Clearwater Beach
Of the names listed below, Central Permitting verified that 1f10 is eligible for this category
THE FOllOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE
VACANCIES:
Name-Address
Comments-Related Experience. Etc.
1. David Allbritton
305 Hillcrest Dr., N., 34615
General Contractor
2. Edward Batsford, Jr.
1018 Sedeeva St., 3461 5
General Contractor
3. Thomas Coates
300 N. Osceola #4A, 34615
Graphic Artist
4. Sheila Cole
252 Dolphin Pt., 34630
Hospice Volunteer Director
current member Beautification Committee
would resign off that
5. Mary DeWitt
1358 Pinebrook Dr., 34615
Interior Design
6. Richard Fleming
2545 NE Coachman Rd., #80, 34625
Interior Design Student
Continued
ORB volunteers COllt.
<<~
7. Humberto Fontana
16432 US 19N, #228, 34624
Social Reform Director wi Church Scientology
8. Herbert Freitag
829 Narcissus Ave., 34630
Minister
current member Community Relations Board
would resign off that
9. Stephen Hackley
1424 S. Highland AVe., 34616
Employed w/Kids Resource (downtown)
10. Howard Hamilton
909 Bay Esplanade, 34630
Businessman, owner Palm Pavilion &
South Beach Pavilion
I
;
1
';
i
t
:i
11. Glenn Hough
1862 Castle Woods Dr., 34619
Contractor
-'
"
"
t
~
12. Sam Lampson
1447 Springdale St., 34615
Self-employed - Quality Neon
13. Susan Orneck
644 Island Way, #206, 34630
Sales/Marketing Design
14. Janet Ott
1717 Starlight Dr., 34615
Interior Designer
15. Ric Ortega
18 S. Corona Ave., 34625
Architect
16. Tal Rutledge
1109 N. Greenwood Ave., 34615
past member
North Greenwood Design Review Committee
17. Arthur Walsh
2066 Madrid Ct., N., 34623
Retired New York City Fire Dept. &
restaurant owner
18. Robert Waterston CPA
2545 NE Coachman Rd., #87,34625
19. Geoffrey Weber Consultant
100 Windward Island, 34630
20. Gary Young Architect
3063 Homestead Ct., 34619
Zipcodes of current members on board:
3 at 3461 5
2 at 3461 6
1 at 34630
1 vacant
elKS
APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET
d'7
Agenda # r
FOR COMMISSION MEETING May 2. 1996 APPOINTMENTS
BOARD: Historic Preservation Board
TERM: 4 years (effective 11/18/93)
APPOINTED BY: City Commission
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater
SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: None
MEMBERS: 5
CHAIRPERSON: Stephen Alosa
MEETING DATES: 3rd Tues., 1 p.m.
PLACE: Conference Room
APPTS. NEEDED: 2
DATE APPTS TO BE MADE: 5/2/96
Name
Date of Original
Appointment
Attendance
Record
I nterest in
reappointment
j
,
I
l
f.
~
f
:i
~
'"
~
Ii
~
!~
'"
*
'1
s
~.
;,
"
"
1
i
!
THE FOllOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(SI HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW
REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW
APPOINTEE.
1. Vacant Seat (Bernard Ferrell resigned 1/96)
2. Vacant Seat (Stephen Alosa resigned 3/96)
THE FOllOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FilL THE ABOVE
VACANCIES:
Name-Address
Comments-Related Experience. Etc.
1. Clorinda Gilreath (Cookie)
1709 Sunset Dr., 34615
Retired, antique sales
2. Ric Ortega
1 8 S. Corona Ave., 34625
Architect
I
i..
Zipcodes of current members:
i:
"
,
5".
1 at 3461 5
1 at 3461 9
1 at 34621
2 vacant
C\K
y
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #:
::z~
Meeting Date: 5/2/96
SUBJECT: Clearwater's representation on the St. Petersburg/Clearwater Economic Development Council
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Reappoint Mr. R. (Dick) Evan Evans for the two year term, May 6, 1996
to May 5, 1998
o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
SUMMARY:
The City appoints two members to this Council.
Mr. Evans' term expires 5/5/96. He is interested in reappointment.
In 1995 the Council held 7 meetings. Mr. Evans was present 6 times and absent once. The first
scheduled meeting in 1996 is May 17th.
Mayor Garvey is Clearwater's other representative on the Council.
1
a
""
j
i
'"
~
:~
t~
)
'~
Ij
~
I~
~~
,:,1
:;:.!
~~
'i
:l
:1~
:~.:
~ :";
,;.
',.'
't
"
,
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
IS
ACM
Other
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Originating Department. .:'\
City Clerk I}
Costs:
NA
Total
Commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved with Conditions
o Denied
o Continued to:
User Department:
Current Fiscal Year
NA
Advertised:
Date:
,7\ Paper:
18 Not Required
Funding Source:
o Capital Improvement
o Operating
o Other:
Attachments:
Submitted by:
Appropriation Code
City Manager
o Printed on recycled paper
A ffeeted Parties
o Notified
181 Not Required
fiil None
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cler@
SUBJECT: Follow up from April 29, 1996 Work Session
COPIES: Elizabeth Deptula, City Manager
DATE: April 30, 1996
In response to questions raised at the April 29, 1996, Work Session the following answers
are provided in fmal agenda order.
Item #15 - S Drawings for Pier 60 park: The multi . r to be used for the work by
Post, Buckley, Shuh an Jernigan is 2.96.
Item #21 - Memoria Causeway Bridge: e cost of the SEIR Study is $743,668 plus a
$115,521 (20%) contingency. The level of tingency is standard for this type of study. Thus
far, none of the contingency has een spe . To upgrade to a full NEP A PD&E study will cost
$39,400. Subtracting this amou om the existing contingency leaves a contingency of
approximately $76,000. The Re u. n regarding State Funding is in the agenda pack. County
and State Funding will be add to the in estigation of funding listing.
Item 1125 - B~ tification Committee~ Infonnation regarding whether the Committee
belie~es 7 member:Yire sufficient will be provi~d after the Committee meets on Wednesday
monung. .
~- Economic Development Council: Mr. Evans has served one two year term on
this council (5/94 to 5/96).
trees.
Miscellan ous(not on this or an ,oIDfng agenda):
He will ask Cle aler be added to the northbound sign conling out of St. Petersburg.
'\.-.
""-
/ "
/'
ORDJNANCE NO. 601i::9i
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
VACATING THE FOLLOWING ALLEYS IN PINECREST
SUBDIVISION; ALL OF THE NORTH/SOUTH ALLEYS IN
BLOCKS 1, 6 & 9; ALL OF THE EAST^NEST ALLEYS IN BLOCKS
1, 2, 5, 6 & 11 ; THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY
LYING WEST OF LOTS 1, 2 & 3 AND EAST OF LOT 8 AND THAT
PORTION OF THE NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY LYING WEST OF LOT
14, AND EAST OF LOTS 15, 16 & 17, ALL BEING IN BLOCK 2;
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY LYING WEST
OF LOTS 3 & 4, AND EAST OF LOT 5, IN BLOCK 11; AND THE
FOLLOWING ALLEYS IN PlAZA PARK ADDITION SUBDIVISION,
THE EASTIWEST ALLEY AND THAT PORTION OF THE
NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY LYING EAST OF LOTS 3. 4, 5 & 6 AND
WEST OF THE SOUTH 45 FEET OF LOT 7 AND WEST OF LOT
11, ALL BEING IN BLOCK 0, SUBJECT TO ALL OF THE
VACATED ALLEYS BEING RETAINED FULL WIDTH AS
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
30 ~.
,1
<
~
WHEREAS, Richard J. Baier, City Engineer, has requested that the City vacate the alleys
described in Exhibit A and as depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that said alleys are not necessary for municipal
use and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the general public that the same be
vacated; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The alleys listed on Exhibit A attached are hereby vacated, closed and
released, and the City of Clearwater quitclaims and releases all of its right, title and interest
thereto except that the City of Clearwater hereby retains drainage and utility easements over the
described property for the installation and maintenance of any and all public utilities thereon.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of Pine lias
County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
and legal sufficiency:
~->~ -
n Caras;;s, Asst. City Attorney
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
Ordinance 6016-96
'., , ' ,',', ,',:.', '.".' , " . :,,::','.', ,,',,',,',,' "': ':,' : ",: : ' , ".' ',:
... . _ . i \ .' ,d . ' . .-:--.
~l:-:' .'
. . ...
30 C\. .
EXHIBIT "A"
ORDINANCE 6016-96
CITY OF CLEARWATER VACATION REQUEST 96-03A
ALLEY VACATIONS IN PINE CREST AND PLAZA PARK ADDITION
SUBDIVISIONS
The following alleys in Pine Crest Subdivision, as recorded in
Plat Book 1, Page 66 of the Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida, described as follows:
~
~
.,
.
n
r
1
{
~
I
.
I
,
I
,
The East/West and North/South alleys in Block 1;
All of the East/West alley and that portion of the North/South
alley lying West of Lots 1, 2 & 3 and East of Lot 8, and that
portion of the North/South alley lying West of Lot 14, and East
of Lots 15 through 17, all being in Block 2;
The East/West alley in Block 5;
The East/West and North/South alleys in Block 6;
The North/South alley in Block 9;
All of the East/West alley and that portion of the North/South
alley lying West of Lots 3 and 4, and East of Lot 5, all being in
Block 11.
The following alleys in Plaza Park Addition Subdivision, as
recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 53 of the Public Records of
Hillsborough County, Florida of which Pinellas County was once a
part, described as follows:
The East/West alley and that portion of the North/South alley
lying East of Lots 3 through 6 and West of the South 45 feet of
Lot 7 and West of Lot 11, all being in Block D.
LEGALS. WJS
V9603A - REVISED 04/10/96
Ordinance 6016-96
J
1 :
: 2
\oj
@ J ~ 14
of, : : 13
YAPLE ST, ~ ~
"6-~y4 _-
~ ~ '% \6 17
.....! 2!
!>
ill
'-
12
w
:)
z
~
~
11
.
10~
9~[
8 3JS
;;'<i
7 ;a-II.
11..
"?I 0 .
9
:8
:7
~
~
~
~
~
V
9~~-r-l~1 : fl1El:,';~~-1 Grm
P~U..(TT:_ --- --1l' r SrRE~1 E 'J---r=:=-:::.:::- --'- ,.---.--
-------- --:..-
\ 12 9 e .: 7 ~ ~ J 2 1 I~
(3) 3----- ---~ 1 0 .. 0 0 N
I f-'~~iO ,u..-.:a. -?3; ~ ~~ < !
4 .9/ 0 ~ & ...
~ 10 12 \3 ,. ,~ <16 W ~~....e
6 11 \ " '
.J.._ 8
vAC Rl~ 11-e-22
r-----r--
I
C I Y C W N I [ 0 ~rw.m... PflOPOSED
5 4 3 2 I 1 PJ~...~ ALLEY VACAllON
IdoL
12 13 ~ 15 16/ ~
I~
Ie.:>
..l~
t8
12
11
2
3
9 (d) 4
e ~
6
10
7
NICHOlSON
2
03
..
5
6
12
h.
~2
9)3
'"
5 :
6 :
:s
: 7
6
J
..
_ .. .
~.- I
_'"i~:h
'oJ 1f' .
:r:: 8~ ~
,~ 9'"'!.::.(
... 0 M.
e. 1".
-I-
..
12
13
~14 .
(J15 .
w
J) 16 . ~
C '~ .
1 fl." ·
19 .
20 .
21
I 23 \~~
~
!
..,-~ 1
-10
'0 ~ 1" ,: ,;
z
tj. t 1 10 S?I
~ ,.. ~ -..,..,---- -_.~
--_ 11 12 13 14 , 12 9 ~' (0)
5 __'_.h___~
--6- ___,,'-~~-\.l -~,---:x~
JONES STREET __n.._ , 14 'J at
~:.. IJ '2 " i ;~;" T IJ0~1 ~,;~~:~- =-~~==: 0'
'VIm ~ 1-1- .. ~II, ,'.=, 1" I J],
.. 5 6 7 8 9 10 Z 2 3 5 II 7 81
~ J" ~ · e)
_ 0 ~-' - --'---
- DREW f,=-.;"n:;;-~;;.~~:::~ "'!__T.......~
.-z--;:;;--j.-;;;.....HI. ..... -'11& '-P;-;; "IJ.
PLAZA PARK ADDITION : ~-- _.-~!."~ :.:'__..~'l...1.;..- '...!..
ALLEY~Hilti~ING____" ~=_-=:..-=-;.;~:,:::::::===.:..-.::.-:.:.-.::.E~..=--=:=:- Ordinanc e
20
19
113
17
16
14 II
10 7
1~
STREE 1
20:
19:
w
::>
z
~
0(
, 3 '3-: 9 8
l.5k
17 ~ ... 10 7
16 C ~4 11
15
18
SEMINOLE
20
19
18
13 12 9 B
VAC lED ,R,lpet
P(l, lllCl '-
17
16
-~
14 " 10 7
1'5
ELDRIDGE
16
15
"@ 7 6
1 9
B 5
1 --
.} ..
~
16 15
w, ( 0
~
5 6
..,
I.
PL~ZA
16 ~
13 14 15 <1 18
\~17
~ 'E'
t--v";;c 900, J
t22~
1. 11 10 9 8 7
HARl
1~ 14
15 16 17
18
\f
12 11
~
'? ~
9 8
7
10
o
20 19
-
17 16
If 9
2
3
S,R, ~90
CITY or CLEARWATER. fLDlUDA
EIolGINEERING DEPAR1'lolENT
ENCINEEIUllC SERVlCt::S
1 :
2:
.3
4
5
6
:' :
; 2
3
4
:5 :
:6 :
'r
2 :
J
4
t--i
f---f I
14 13 12 11
7
8
,
3
..
:.
6
! 1
F=-'
2
I--
3
~4-
5
7C\
,~
~.
,.--
.
6
LEGEND
:
7
w
:::>
z
~
<{
8
9
10
11
STREEl
6
7
c
c
8
5 4 ,; 2 1
f---
v CAlC O.F 71 2~
P , 10 '-\
=$KD
1 13 14 15 16
9
10
/11
I-'
S TREE T
0{
z
0{
>
~
VI
Z
Z
w
a.
T
I
1
I
6
7
:x::
~
0::
o
~
< 4 ~ 2 1
12
l\ v CAli D 0,1 :;.ell-/
I" p el
10 \I 12 13 14
MAPLE
B
9
9 10
I j I I I I I I I I l-t--i
r~~ 1__ I'
If '(fv,~ 13 12 11 rw~ ~
LEE S T.
1 2 3 ": r-; -~H, 7 8 ~
I- -- ---
,
S TREEr
:,
h<!~
3 ~
<\ ':; ,/
V 11 12 13 14
l" 5
6
~ t-+-t--f--j- I
elT>
O"*'f:O
o
12
1\
t E~
13
10
I
.
14.11";\ 9 ,
....8...1
15 ~ ~ is
\.l '\ ; ~.
l.U
.<,
94
8 (~ ~~ _
\ ---
9 10
16
f"\
i~ ~
I 17
'..
6
...
(0)
~
3
~
0::
<(
Q.
~
..
~l 0-
:"1 ~
-2-----
S TREE T
,."-"
00
~2
..is
IX
94 0 ~
<( ~ ~
N OJ 0.
4. '0 ;;/
ii' U5
2 2
~...
-'2
~
~ '-
> 7 B 9
-;
2
.3
4
6
6016-96
. .... . ~~ ---~--"---' -~-~.-~.. ._.'-'-'~
MAY el, '96 18:46 (ET) Ma~or Rita Garve8
rw-AY 01 '96 10: 29 FLA LEAGLE OF CITIES ge4 22238e6
PAGE 1 of 1
, , P.1/1 .
R~ 3~
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUESTED!
-
REVISED LEGISLATIVE ALERT!!!!!
ONLY TWO MORE DAYS REMAINING
May 1, 1996 \'\\0\.\0 v
TO: FLC Board ofDlrecton
Key Officials
FROM: Kelvin J. Robinso~ Legislative Director
. COPIES TO:
CO'MMlss/n",.
, MAY Q ~ 1996
PRESS. .
CLERK / ATTORNEY
Your phone caD TODAY CaD make the difference!!!!!
1. Pension bills HB 1951 (Crady) and SB 2484 (Dudley)
By a 95-22 vote, the House passed DB 1951 yesterday and sent it to the senate. . despite the
effons of several representatives to amend' the bill. and those who spoke against' it. caU, the (.,
League if you want a copy of the vote record. Please call your Senators and strongly urge them
to vote NO on SB 2484 or DB 1951. whichever is taken up. In addition. Jfyou know the senate :
.
Republican and Democratic leaders. please 'call them and urge them to work to keep tbe80 bills :
· from being heard. The loss of Home Rule ,authority ~ these bills is virtually complete. and ,tho "
fiscal impact is HUGE. THIS IS THE LAST Cl:lANCE TO DEFEAT THIS BILL '
2. Presumption of Correctness HB:557 and SB 740
"
M you know from previous faxes and Bul/~1ins, this is the Jarpst unfunded mandate facing the '
Legislature this year-but it has moved rapidly. thanks to the investor-owned,utiUties and 'big
buslnCSSC3. Senator McKay bas agreed to offer an amendment ~equesting a study of'the appraisal '
problem; we agree that a study is better than the bill itself. ,P1~ call your Senators IJUlJu:II "
th · meDdment is d .' can and t~ QI ,
feedback-McKay needs a count on who 'is committed to Jtanding with blDa. Wi~t the
McKay amendment, cities, counties and school districtI snay lose $480 million in property tax,
revenue in the first year. We expect this bill to be heard by the House and Senate TODAY.,
.. ,
LastlY. we have heard from the Speakerts office that the "gavel to gaver' coveraaeofthe House
and Senate will be extended all week for the Legislature. You may want to COntaCt your cable
operator regarding your local access channel. if you have one, about this extended coverage.
Please call me. Lynn Tipton or Sharon Berrian at the Lugue office shou!~ 3"OU have any
questioru. Thank you for your help!
-
PRELIMINARY AGENDA
Clearwater City Commission Worksession - 9:00 A.M. - Monday, April 29, 1996
Clearwater City Commission Meeting - 6:00 P.M. - Thursday, May 2, 1996
Service Awards
@
5.
1 .
2.
C)
EN ENGINEERING
1 .
Authorize work order to Post, Buckley, Shuh & Jernigan (PBS&J) for shop drawing review for
architectural services components associated with Pier 60 Park; approve transfer of $16,820 to
the project code from the unappropriated retained earnings of the General Fund
Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #6022-96 - Vacating North/South alley lying between the N
Y2 of Lot 14 & the N ~ of Lot 1, E.A. Marshall's Sub., subject to alley being retained full width
as a drainage & utility easement (Multi-Media Video Corp., V96-05)
Res. #96-33 - dedicating westerly 40' of a portion of city owned property in Sec. 33-28-16 as
landmark Drive Right-of-Way
Reclaimed Water - Discussion re boundaries, parameters & proposed process and timelines ~
Memorial Causeway Discussion & Update L?
NC+' G (\ .S',;t , .s-e, e. 5-1 cP #: ~
CP CENTRAL PERMITTING .J
2.
3.
1 .
(Cont. from 3/21 & 4/18/96) Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5989-96 & #5990-96 - Land
Use Plan Amendment to Commercial General & CG Zoning for property located at 401 S. Belcher
Rd., Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 23.11 (Gerry Staring / Natalie Moyles, Trustee, LUP96-01, Z96-02)
Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6018-96 & #6019-96 - Annexation & RS-8 Zoning for
property located at 1612 N. Betty Lane, Stevenson's Heights Sub., Blk B, Lot 14 (Herbert, A96-
13)
Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6020-96 & #6021-96 - Annexation & RS-8 Zoning for
property located at 2077 Douglas Ave., Cleardun Sub., Blk A, part of Lots 5-8 (Clement, A96-14)
Purchase of Permit*Plan CS, Permit*Plan Cashier software, 1 st year maintenance & related
services from Tidemark Computer Systems, Seattle, W A, at an est. $105,000; approve est.
expenditure of $42,000 for Digital Equipment Corporation AXP computer with financing of this to
be provided under City's master lease-purchase agreement
Receipt/Referral - LDCA defining "public safety facility", identifying zones where public safety
facilities may be allowed & providing standards for approval (LDCA96-11)
Approve Downtown Clearwater Design Guidelines; Res. #96-35 - making findings & adopting
design guidelines for the Urban Center Zoning District; provide direction with regard to other
design review issues
Receipt/Referral - allowing bed and breakfast inns as a conditional use within the Multiple Family
Residential 10 District, Neighborhood Commercial District, Beach Commercial District & Resort
Commercial 24 & 28 Districts (LDCA96-09)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
CLK CITY CLERK
4.
5.
6.
7.
Airport Authority - 1 appointment
Beautification Committee - 2 appointments / I /0/"\
~ '-'<.:e.. c:::;., Ip ~~ ',~ ~
Parks & Recreation Board _ NcA- (j n ~~ rex..) ..) ~-
a) Direction re Board's recommendation to reduce number of members to 7
b) 2 appointments
Design Review Board - 1 appointment
Historic Preservation Board - 2 appointments
Reappoint Dick Evans to 51. Petersburg/Clearwater Economic Development Council
Legislative Update
4/29/96
1
CA LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Second Reading Ordinances
1 . Ord. #5992-96 - LDCA revising density conversions for nursing homes & residential shelters, and
revising parking regulations for nursing homes, residential shelters & group care facilities
(LDCA9 6-0 5)
2. Ord. #6014-96 - Annexation for property located at 3014 Carolina Ave., Bayview City Sub., Blk
5, Lot 9 (John J. & Dorothy A. Kach, TRE, A96-12)
3. Ord. #6015-96 - RS-8 Zoning for property located at 3014 Carolina Ave., Bayview City Sub., Blk
5, Lot 9 (John J. & Dorothy A. Kach, TRE, A96-12)
First Reading Ordinances
1. Ord. 116016-96 - Vacating following alleys in Pinecrest Subdivision: all of North/South alleys in
Blks 1, 6 & 9; all of East/West alleys in Blks 1, 2, 5, 6 & 11 ; that portion of North/South alley
lying West of Lots 1-3 and East of Lot 8 and that portion of the North/South alley lying West of
Lot 14 and East of Lots 15-17, all being in Blk 2; that portion of North/South alley lying West of
Lots 3 & 4 and East of Lot 5 in Blk 11; and the following alleys in Plaza Park Addition
Subdivision: East/West alley and that portion of the North/South alley lying East of Lots 3-6 and
West of the South 45' of Lot 7 and West of Lot 11, all being in Blk D, subject to all of the
vacated alleys being retained full width as drainage and utility easements (City, V96-03A)
,.
"
'"
"
'.
J
.
Agreements, Deeds and Easements
1. Sidewalk easement - portion of Sec. 13-29-15 located according to plat of A & W Glads, Inc.,
1200 Hermitage Avenue (Falone)
2. Sanitary Sewer Lien Agreement - 1836 Diane Dr., Carlton Terrace First Addition, Blk I, Lot 16
(Izzo)
OTHER CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
City Manager Verbal Reports
J.~..J qqc;-Cf 7 B \-ldj e-t 3() cds
Commission Discussion Items
Other Commission Action
Adjourn
4/29/96
2
J1!I.' ~ ',,' '
04/23/1996 09:48
8134626528
CLW PARKS AND REC
PAGE 02
eCJk3C\..
City of Clearwater
Interdepartmental Correspondence ,.
TO:
FROM:
COPIES:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk
Ream Wilson, Director, Parks and Recreation Dep
Betty Deptula, City Manager J
Parks and Recreation Board Recommendation l
April 23, 1996
1
i
t
,
.
A
i
il:
2
.,
:}
i
\~
~
C
..
J\
r.
J
~
I
f
,
I
I
\
i
Section 2.232 of the City Code of Ordinances states: "The Parks and Recreation Board
shall consist of nine members". However, at the Parks and Recreation Board meeting of
Monday, April 22, 1996, the Board asked that we forward their recommendation to the
City Commission that the composition of the Parks and Recreation Board be seven
members instead of nine.
As you are aware, the Board has been operating with seven members for the last several
months because of vacancies. Current members feel that the size of the existing Board
(seven members) is sufficient and that nine members may be too many. I told the Board
that I would forward this information to your office for consideration and that I would
advise them of the response at their May meeting.
Please contact me if you have any questions or desire further information.
RW:mg
\ \PllI'b"-YI'\DAT.A. \. WPFlJ.E~QOHEEN\RWMEMOS\GOUDEAU4.doc
'ld30 >n:l31~ AltQ
966L E 6 Hd\f
aaAlae>aR
!
~
;~
~n'nU 0 ~....
, ' ,
. \' . . .., \.
" '
, '
, '
, - ~ ~ .....
.,. . - - --------.--.-. ~.-...~~ - ... ._~_.~... -. . . . .
Name
Date of Original
Appointment
Attendance
Record
Interest in
reappointment
c\ K 3 h APPOINTMENT WORKSHEEI
*recv since notification
FOR COMMISSION MEETING May 2. 1996 APPOINTMENTS Agenda 11_
BOARD: Parks and Recreation Board
TERM: 4 years (effective 1 1118/93)
APPOINTED BY: City Commission
RESIDENCY REQUIREMEN,.: City of Clearwater
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Not Required
MEMBERS: 9
CHAIRPERSON: Charles Weaver
MEETING DATES: 4th Monday, 6:30 p.m.
APPTS.NEEDED:2
DATE APPTS. TO BE MADE: 5/2/96
THE FOllOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW
REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW
APPOINTEE.
1. Vacant Seat
2. Vacant Seat
Deborah Hobbs & Doyce Haggard resigned in 9/95
Bernard Panush - appointed 11/2/95, resigned 1196 due to evening meeting time, not wanting to
leave his wife, who has poor health, alone at that time.
David Berry - appointed 12/7/95, before the January meeting, notified us he was not accepting
the appointment afteralI as he realized the evening time would be a problem (driving) for him.
THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FilL THE ABOVE
VACANCIES:
Name-Address
.G.Qmments-Related Experience. Etc.
1. Kirk L. Burness
1206 N. Osceola Ave., 34615
Management Consultant
2. Kim Cashman
1462 Excalibur Dr., 34624
Business Owner, Advantage Yours Tennis
*3. Geraldine Shriver
101 S. Old Coachman, 34625
Teacher
4. Robert Sudalnik
2021 Oakdale Way, 34615
Computer Executive
Zipcodes of current members on board:
2 at 3461 5
1 at 3461 6
1 at 34623
2 at 34624
1 at 34630
2 vacant