11/15/1993
'i:
"
'J~, .
V,';' f
~
,
,
!/,
.' ~
AGENDA
, .~
"~'
.f
DATE
II
15.. q..~
-
119~3
---~-,tt....t.. .'.''-''.'1,
t...____.__...,.. . II... ..
. . ...f"! ..,,,;, "
..... 'to... ~ 1 ''"":. " .~"
c,
.:',' t t.'.'" .I; ..,,;,11' "tr',
.,;
,,'
,.
,',
;
;:.
d
, .
. .;
",
." ',~.1.',> _".
.,';..,... '..
. '.<~
:':,
:..,;.~
,
.
.
.
Ornm\SSlon
, I
15
'13
':i
Meet\ "
..
-
.~ \
" '
"
. -:":', t~. :,
"
"t", .
~
, -:-~. :..~~ '~',
',tj
"
t ',,"
i
, ....
~ ~,:: ~~."
."" .~~. /" '."~
Yo.. .
,
,~
f: I.i... , .~' .~-.~ , . ,"
,:.;;1
ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING - November 15, 1993 - 9:00 A.M.
Welcome. We are glad to have you join us. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then
state your name and address. Persons speaking before the City Commission shall be limited to 3
minutes. No person shall speak more than once on the same subject unless granted permission by
the City Commission.
Service Awards - 5 awards presented.
Employee of the Month 11/93 - Bobby Gross, Parks & Recreation Department.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
1. (Cont. from 11/1/93) Presentation re:
recycling program (CM)
1 . Received.
2. (Cont. from 11/1/93) Contract for recycling
to the City of Clearwater for 5 years,
beginning 1/3/94 (CM)
2. Awarded.
3. City Manager Verbal Reports
3. staff gave the TDC presentation re:
converting Maas Brothers to a convention
center.
4. Commission Discussion Items
a) Holiday On The Islands
b) Rare Environmentally Sensitive Land
c) Walgreens rezoning at Morritt Center -
Hercules & Gulf-to-Bay
4. a) Waived insurance liability.
b) Continued.
c) Continued.
5. Other Commission Action
5. Consensus to agenda discussion re: New
City Hall for 11/18/93.
Thomas questioned the status of Jolley
Trolley agreement, Betty Deptula reported
funding agreement would be on the 11/18
agenda; lease agreement within 60 days.
6. Adjournment
6. 1 :55 p.m.
. ,1
"
,:
11 /1 5/93
1
COPIES :
City Commissioners, Michael Wright, Cyndie Goudeau
. ; .~ . t"'
> t ,. ~ f'. .,
.......'
(.. '
:,',
,.
TO:
Mayor Rita Garvey
FROM:
Betty J. Blunt, Confidential Clerk Receptionist
SUBJECT;
Presentations at the November 15) 1993 City Commission Meeting
DATE:
November 15, 1993
The following presentations will be made at the November 15, 1993 City Commission
meeting. ..
SERVICE PINS
5 years
Jose Reid, Police Departlnent (letter of appreciation and pin with city seal)
John Smith, Police Department (letter of appreciation and pin with city seal)
Gerald Peer, Jr'" Police Department (letter of appreciation and pin with city seal)
20 years
James Pyatt, General Services/Building & Maintenance (letter of appreciation and
watch)
30 years
Forrest Saylor, Jr., Public Works/Solid Waste (let.ter of appreciation and vacation
package)
"EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH II for November, 1993 is Bobbie Gross, Nursery
Division, Parks & Recreation Depa11ment.
t.
>:; ';-:i\~'" / "
.,' ,.i
Commissioner Thomas asked me to prepare a spread sheet comparing the Kimmons
Recycling Bid and the City of Clearwater Bid.
'City of Clearwater
COST COMPARISON
RESIDENTIAL YEAR 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Multifamily
(five 90 Gal Carts)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
1.99/mo
2.05/mo
2. 12/mo
2.05/mo
1. 99/mo
61.48/mo
63.00/mo
63.00/mo
63.00/mo
64.52/mo
Kimmons
1. 695/mo
1. 75/mo
1.80/mo
1. 86/mo
1.92/mo
78.05/mo
79.80/mo
8l.OD/mo
81.50/mo
82.80/mo
'.Additional rate per Residents for other than curbside collection per container
None for up to 5 containers $l.oo/mo
, 'Cost of 2nd container
Replacement of damaged
or missing container
Wheeled bin toters
Provision of Multi
material drop off
(average 5 years)
References
Approx. $5.00
o
Approx $8.00
o
Clearwater customer
survey shows excellent ratings
Approx $5.00
Approx$5 ~ 00
Approx. $65~00
$2,960/mo.
Some concerns about
Kimmons' managers
and start up in
. -~
~ < ';~' :'; ';L~'d
Tarpon, In Treasure
Island
$2.25/customer Imo,
County concerned
about
management.
References checked
by documented
phone calls.
..
Committee Ranking
(initial)
3 Members (of 5) ranked
City Top bidder.
2 members ranked
Kimmons Top
Bidder.
Committee Ranking
(after presentations)
5 members (of 5) of committee
ranked City Top Bidder.
Concerns in awarding to City addressed by the Committee in the proposed agreement:
That the City would not be held to the bid Le. that the City could go over the
expenditure projections or under the revenue projections and loose money and nothing would
be done. See page 6 article 2. The Committee required a pro-forma and a business plan.
This would be reviewed yearly with the Budget Advisory Committee and the City
Commission.
That there be one individual completely responsible for the success of this program.
Bob Brumback, Assistant Director Public Works has this task. The monies for this operation
will be set up into an enterprise account so that it will operate independently.
That Commercial recycling be open to anyone because of the change in state law.
This should start January 1, 1993.
Submitted by,
Kathy S. Rice
Deputy City Manager
October 30, 1993
(:
,/ :
, ,~ . -
','
, ....'
,t ,.'
"
" /' .
,.1 _',-
t ....
" ,
~ . ,
~t .
~ y: ' ;.
,.' .
..:. ....,.,. 1".' .;:.,'.~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING 810
SUMMARY OF BID AMOUNTS
KI MMINS CITY
TYPE OF SERVICE BID BID VARIANCE
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
YEAR 1 $539,010 $632,820 ($93,810)
YEAR 2 $556,500 $651,900 ($95,400)
YEAR 3 $572,400 $674,160 ($101,760)
YEAR 4 $591,480 $651,900 ($60,420)
YEAR 5 $610,560 $632,820 ($22,260) "
"
SUBTOTAL $2.869,950 $3,243,600 ($373,650)
AVE PRICE PER HOME $1.81 $2.04
D130P OFF CENTER
YEAR 1 $32,400 $0 $32.400
YEAR 2 $33,600 $0 $33,600
YEAR 3 $34,800 $0 $34,800
YEAR 4 $37,200 $0 $37,200
YEAR 5 $39,600 $0 $39,600
SUBTOTAL $1 77,600 $0 $177,600
A VE COST PER MONTH $2,960 0
MUL TI-FAMIL Y
YEAR 1 $124,353 $119,130 $5,223
YEAR 2 $247,722 $237,533 $10,189
YEAR 3 $376,974 $355,964 $21,010
YEAR 4 $423,222 $397,580 $25,642
YEAR 5 $430,128 $405,434 $24,694
SUBTOTAL $1,602,399 $1,515,641 $86,758 ' ,.
AVE PRICE PER UNIT $1.73 $1.65
TOT AL 5 YEAR BID AMOUNT $4,649,949 $4,759,241 $137,094
NOTE: KIMMINS WAS SUBST ANTIALL Y LOWER ON THE COMMERCIAL RECYCLING
. . r ~
6 C.Y, FEL
289
6 $50.00 $300
~ ' ;.
.t - ~ . . ',i.,. :.~
"<,
.' >
, .
,. '. :
ESTIMATE OF TOTAL BILLINGS FOR
MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING
KIMMINS RECYCLING CORP
1994
TYPE OF SERVICE
UNITS
SERVICE
OTY PRICE! TOTAL
MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS
5439
611 $15.61 $9.538
4 C.Y. FEL
452
15 $35.00 $525
RIO CONTAINER
o
o $540.00 $0
TOTAL PER MONTH
TOTAL PER YEAR
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO
6180
$10.363
$124.353
$1.68
1995
TYPE OF SERVICE
UNITS
SERVICE
aTY PRICEI TOTAL
MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS
1 0560
1188 $15.96 $18.960
4 C.Y. FEL
880
30 $35.70 $1,071
TOTAL PER MONTH
TOTAL PER YEAR
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO
12000
$20,643
$247,722
$1.72
6 C.Y. FEL
560
12 $51.00 $612
AIO CONTAINER
o
o $540.00 $0
~ , " '. ,'" . . . .' ~ >
.t...
'., .',' ~:" , . ; ,
"
, ,
,:, .
"i ~
. '..f, ~ 'c;o "
, r,' "
.'
1996
TYPE OF SERVICE UNITS OTY PRICEI TOTAL
SERVICE MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS 15998 1780 $16.20 $28,836
4 C.Y. FEL 1333 45 $36,50 $1,643
6 C.Y. FEL 849 18 $52.00 $936
RIO CONTAINER 0 0 $550.00 $0
TOTAL PER MONTH 18180 $31 A 15
TOTAL PER YEAR $376,974
A VERAGE PER UNIT PER MO $1.73
1997 "
"
TYPE OF SERVICE UNITS OTY PRICE! TOTAL
SERVICE MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS 17334 1950 $16.30 $31,785
4 C.Y. FEL 1466 50 $37.25 $1,863
6 C.Y. FEL 934 20 $53.00 $1,060
RIO CONTAINER 266 1 $561,00 $561
TOTAL PER MONTH 20000 $35,269
TOTAL PER YEAR $423,222
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO $1,76
,',
"
'. '
" "
.. '
,\ i-. .: "I;.;'
, ." >
'" ',"
.... ", ~ t t .' '
1998
TYPE OF SERVICE UNITS aTY PRICEI TOTAL
SERVIC E MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS 17334 1950 $16.56 $32.292
4 C.Y. FEL 1466 50 $38.00 $1.900
6 C.Y. FEL 934 20 $54.00 $1,080
RIO CONTAINER 266 1 $572.00 $572
TOTAL PER MONTH 20000 $35,844
TOTAL PER YEAR $430,128
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO $1.79
GRAND TOTAL COST OVER 5 YEARS $1.602.398
ASSUMPTIONS:
1. UTILIZING 90 GAL. CARTS ASSUME THE FOLLOWING:
A. EACH CLUSTER OF CARTS WILL SERVICE 40 DWELLING UNITS
B. EACH CLUSTER WilL CONSIST OF AN AVERAGE OF 4.5 CARTS
2. NOT ALL MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WANT TO USE 90 GAL CARTS:
A. NOT ENOUGH SPACE FOR CARTS
B. USE OF CARTS IS NOT ADEQUATE SUCH AS IS THE CASE WITH A
HIGH RISE BUILDING.
, j:
'\ :';
3.WE HAVE ASSUMED THAT ABOUT 13% OF THE UNITS SERVICED WILL UTILIZE
FRONT-END OR ROLL-OFF CONTAINERS. THIS ASSUMPTION IS BASED
ON EXPERIENCE AND IS CONFIRMED BY EXAMINING THE CITY'S
EXISTING PILOT PROGRAM.
!, ,..
.
.
ESTIMATE OF TOTAL BILLINGS FOR
MUL TIFAMIL Y RECYCLING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
1994
TYPE OF SERVICE UNITS OTY PAIC EI TOTAL
SERVICE MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS 5439 611 $13.66 $8,346
4 C.Y. FEL 452 15 $68.41 $1,026
6 C.Y. FEL 289 6 $92.51 $555
RIO CONTAINER 0 0 $540.00 $0
TOTAL PER MONTH 6180 $9,927
TOTAL PEA YEAR $119,130
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO $1.61
1995
TYPE OF SERVICE UNITS Ory PRICE! TOTAL
SERVICE MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS 10560 1188 $14,00 $16,632
4 C.Y. FEL 880 30 $68.41 $2,052
6 C.Y. FEL 560 12 $92.51 $1,110
RIO CONTAINER 0 0 $540.00 $0
TOTAL PER MONTH 12000 $19,794
TOTAL PER YEAR $237,533
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO $1.65
" ;,,:'.\:;:!
, " ~,
, ',,'
} "
. .>
" .,... ~
:-r. '. ',' .
1996
TYPE OF SERVICE UNITS aTY PRICEI TOTAL
SERVICE MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS 15998 1780 $14.00 $24,920
4 C.Y. FEL 1333 45 $68.41 $3,078
. ;'
6 C.Y. FEL 849 18 $92.51 $1,665
RIO CONTAINER 0 0 $550.00 $0
TOTAL PER MONTH 18180 $29,664
TOTAL PER YEAR $355,964
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO $1.63
1997
TYPE OF SERVICE UNITS aTY PRICEI TOTAL
SERVICE MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS 17334 1950 $14.00 $27,300
4 C.Y. FEL 1466 50 $68.41 $3.421
d.
6 C.Y. FEL 934 20 $92.51 $1,850
RIO CONTAINER 266 1 $561.00 $561
TOTAL PER MONTH 20000 $33,132 ..
TOTAL PER YEAR $39~,580
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO $1.66
., '!.,
",
.'
.
.
1998
TYPE OF SERVICE UNITS aTY PRICE! TOTAL
SERVICE MONTH PRICE
90 GAL CARTS 1 7334 1950 $14.33 $27,944
4 C.Y. FEL 1466 50 $68.41 $3,421
6 C.Y. FEL 934 20 $92.51 $1,850
RIO CONTAINER 266 $572.00 $572
TOTAL PER MONTH 20000 $33,786
TOTAL PER YEAR $405,434
AVERAGE PER UNIT PER MO $1,69
GRAND TOTAL COST OVER 5 YEARS $1,515,641
ASSUMPTIONS:
1. UTILIZING 90 GAL.CARTS ASSUME THE FOLLOWING:
A. EACH CLUSTER OF CARTS WILL SERVICE 40 DWELLING UNITS
B. EACH CLUSTER WILL CONSIST OF AN AVERAGE OF 4.5 CARTS
2. NOT ALL MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WANT TO USE 90 GAL CARTS:
A.NOTENOUGHSPACEFORCARTS
B. USE OF CARTS IS NOT ADEQUATE SUCH AS IS THE CASE WITH A
HIGH RISE BUILDING.
3. WE HAVE ASSUMED THAT ABOUT 13% OF THE UNITS SERVICED WILL UTILIZE
FRONT-END OR ROLL-OFF CONTAINERS. THIS ASSUMPTION IS BASED
ON EXPERIENCE AND IS CONFIRMED BY EXAMINING THE CITY'S
EXISTING PILOT PROGRAM.
-,'
\
!
,. .
C!ALc.utAI10fJS prebS6VTW 7C!.
!EVrtt..UATlOtJ COMHf Tn€- 0,0 vUL'( :26, /7'13,
ESTIMATE OF TOTAL BILLINGS FOR
COMMERCIAL & MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING
I.
I
I
MULTIFAMILY:
UNITS TOTAL
TYPE OF SERVICE SERVICED QTY PRICE COST
90 GAL CARTS 13000 1350 $15.61 $21,074
4 C.Y. FEL 1100 25 $35.00 $875
6 C.Y. FEL 700 15 $50.00 $750
RIO CONTAINER 200 1 $540.00 $540
TOTAL PER MONTH 15000 $23,239
TOTAL PER YEAR $278,862
AVE COST PER UNIT PER MO $1.55
COMMERCIAL:
BUSINESSES TOTAL
TYPE OF SERVICE SERVICED QTY PRICE COST
4 C.'l. PEL 25 25 I $35.00 $875
6 C.Y. PEL 75 75 $50.00 $3,750
90 GAL CARTS 300 500 $15.61 $7,805
COMPACTORS 2 2 $550.00 $1,100
TOTAL PER MONTH 402 $13,530
TOTAL PER YEAR $162,360
~.VERAGE COST PER BUSINESS $33.66
TOTAL PER YEAR MULTIFAMILY & COMMERCIAL
$441,222
~
n . '\,\ ~~
.~: .! ~,,~.~.. . .1
. I \i4.. ~~
....~ -- ...... - .-..... .~....... ". . ",'
( <<:)'0 ijlil
, .-
:l ._....1'~.((
~ t"~~~t ;."'~.:'<(.''''
, "~.".., 1'.' ", ' ;'...
..". .( ~~" ..~I-----"', .. . ..' . . ...
'!~~ .'_ '. i "j' ,
:.,..,,~ ' ,1 j .. :~ ,'.
,;' ~ .' ..'
t-.., .
'. k ': :
, .
'I ...
/.:..... ;;: ~'(
'. '
.'.~ '; r
. .
I . '.' l ~ ~ ~ . '~., ,'. ,
: . ~. . ',':' . .
'., (" ,... . / .
.: .. t.', ~ I .'~I. " . '.
.. ~ :.: .
A'IYI'l\ClIt.11W1' 13
Streets Basc Rccycling- - Pinellas
Park
(Sce Public \Vorhs - 'l'flllu:/lorICltieJll)
Utility Trailc.' Dcsig-ncu to
Transport Specialized Firc
Equipment Bud Material - 'I'lllllarnc
"-
The city Fire Department
needed lo lransport specialized
equipment and materials to large-
senie fire scenes, hnzunlous mate-
rial incidcncc, or any incident.
requiring additional support [lnd
resources. A utility trailer W[lS
desibTJwd to curry a power p\;lIlt
with lil~hts, foam, Scolt air boUle!:>,
a Hurst tool, chainsaws, nil' COIll-
pressor and DI-i's-all niJsorbenl.
The fully equipped trailer will
enable frontline eqllipment. to be
put back in service sooner, allow-
ing for quicl<er responSCf; to addi-
tional nlarms~ Contact: Mark
Smith, Fire COlllmander, City of'
'I'amnrac Fire Departmcnt, 7501
Northwest 88th AVPTlue, Tamarac.
FL ~l3321 ; (~305) '72'1- 2.{ ~3G.
Vehicle Maintcnance - 'l'alllarac
The city's Fire Department
initiated a Preventive Mainle-
nance and Repair Program where
firefighters are llsed to perform
routine maintenance as schedllled
by the commander in charge of
maintenance. UncleI' the Ilrogram,
firelighters receive specialized
training in how to repair the vari-
ous fire truck apparat.us, including
brakes, pumps, the cll[{ine nnd the
elcctrical system. li'ircli!{hters gain
from knowing and trusting the
apparatus they maintain, nnel can
recognize nnel cOl~rcct potent.ial
problems, This provicl,cs for
shorter down-timm; and lower
repair costs for the city. Contact:
Mark Smith, Fire Commandm',
City or Tarnarac Fire nf~partinent,
7501 Northwest 88lh Avenue,
'l'a1l1araC, FL a:l:121; (;J05) '72'1-
2436,
FOHm-Filled Tires - Temple Terrace
'l'he city's recycling vehicles
cxpCI'i(mced a high frequency or
nut. tires caused by bmltcn glnss at
the local recycling facility. This
CITY INNOVATIONS SHOWCASE'93 <2>
The hi,.i III] of Huy Wol SOil as WI ill-holl se mQch inist {or the Cocoa Beach Water
UedUlIlCllioll Del'U,.Ll/wlIl has savcd the city LhOIlSQllcls of dol/ars.
resulted ill lost prouuctivity for the
recycling crews. as well as for t.he
city's mechanics who had to he
called olll to make repairs. Sturf
began using foalll-lilled tires that
are ollen used with construction
equipment. Since implcmentation,
there have been no HaL tires, thus
increasing pl'odlldivity nnt! maxi-
mizing available manpower and
funding. Con lad: Woody Garcia.
Deputy Diredor. Public Wodu;
Department, City of Tem})le Ter-
race, GOOD Whiteway Drive,
'I'(~mple 'l'crrnce. FL 3~lG 17; un:o
08D-7170 or Sunl:Olll DG7-7170.
time and makes belter use of em-
ployees skills. Contact: Hal Bruce,
Administrative Assistant to City
Manager, Causeway Department,
Ci ty of Treasure Island, 120 I08th
Avenue, Treasure Island, FL
33706; (813) 360-0811.
Hehabilitation of Sewer System
Infrastructure - Winter Park
(See Public Worhs - Walcr and
Was/cwa leI' AI 011 agemellt)
Solid Waste
Mallagenlent
Using Vehiclc Mcchanics for
llddg'c Maintenancc - Treasure
Island
City Emphasizes Rccycling-
Clcarwater
The city owns and operates a
[).l-ycar-old basculc bridge. In
1 DH2, the bridge's old gea.' drive
system was replaced with a hy-
dJ'ilulic ::;ystem lIwt has proven to
be very reliable. However, weekly
maintenance is very imJlortant.
Until recently, genl)ral Illainte-
llilllCC personnel from the Public
\Vorl<s Department were used on
iln llvertillle h;)si~;, Now ci ty ve-
hicle mechllllics are lIsed during
n~gtll(\I' honrl:i, which l:iavcs over-
"Buying Recycled" - A 1990
ordinance addressed the procure-
mcnt of recycled paper. The city
spent an estimated $200,000 on
recycled nwterinls in fiscal ycar
IH91-92. Products made from re-
cycled plastic, metal and yard
waste have also been Jlurchased,
These products include picnic
tables. benches, lrash containers,
dumpsters. landscape timbers,
Illulch, car Hl.llpS and speed bumps,
When large clIstomers like the city
ATrACIIr>1ENT B
o PUBLIC WOnIm
delllnnd more recycled products,
manufacturers have the economic
incentive to afTer more of these
products to the public, thus com-
pleting the recycling loop.
"Pilot Curbside Recycling
Pl'ogrnm" - 'fhe cit.y's Solid Wasle
Division introduced a six-mon th
pilot curbside/curbsort volunlary
recycling program in May 1992 in
four test neighborhoods. HesidenLs
were provided with recycling bins
and eight recyclables were col-
lected weekly with II compartmen-
talized recycling truck. The pro-
gram involved an intensive educa-
tion campaign, n participation
study and two surveys. Also tested
were the separntion of yard waste
for recycling and once-a-week gar-
bage collection. The progrnm rc-
ceived strong citizen support, with
83 percent of those surveyed ex-
pressing their approval and re-
corded participation rates of lip 1.0
86 percent.
Contact: Julia Jablonsld, Public
lnformation rteprescntative, Solid
Waste Division, City of Clear-
water, 1180 Russell Street, Clear-
water, FL 34615; (813) 462-6654.
i
~i
~
!
,
City Employees Hccycle Paper
nnd Support Local Charity - Cocoa
Bench
I
City employees are reducing the
now of trash to the county landfill
by recycling newspaper, office
paper and computer paper. By
allowing members of the Associa-
tion of Retarded Citizens (ARC) to
collect the recyclables from the
rear of city hall, the city is saving
the costs associated with labor and
transportation to deliver the mate-
rials to the recyclers. At the same
time, the city is supporting the
AHC's fundraising efforts. ContncL:
Vince Patete, Sanitation InspecLor,
City of Cocoa Beach, Post Office
Box 320280, Cocoa Dench, Il'L
32932-0280; (407) 868-3222.
Group Cities Hecyclinlt Program -
Coconut Cree\t
The ciLies or Coconut Creek,
Lnuclcrhill, North Lauderdale,
Mnrgnto nnd Tn Illarac operate a
joint.-venture I'(~sidcnt.inl recyclilll{
progrnm under nn int.edocal ngree-
ment. The progrnm provides recy-
cling fiervice to /lIore Uwn 90,000
resiclenLinl units in the five eities.
Cont.ad: Sleven Magee, Program
Administralor, City Mannger':=;
Office, Ci ty of Coconut Creelt, It800
WC!iL Copnns Road, Coconut
Creelt, FL 33066; (305) 973.6720.
Andrew Mulch - I"ort Lauderdale
(See Camllll/llity lJcul'lo}llllel/t .
Beau tifica lioll alld CO/lservatio/l)
Hecycling of "Stonn Damage"
Dehris in Pnrlts - Fort Mende
(See COlIllllll/lity !)c/lclOjJIIlCllf.
Beautificatio/l a/ld COl/serll(/tio/l)
Corrugated Cardboard Hecycling
Incentive Program - Lakcland
The city began collecting COITU-
gated cardboard from commercial
nccounts os of April] 991 in re-
sponse to thc 1988 Solid Wastc
Manngement Act mandat.es. Using
slale grant money, the collection
system was expanded in December
1992 with the addition or more
collection containers, purchased by
the Refuse/Recycling Omce. Par-
ticipating customers were given
t.he containers and provided with
ome.a-week pick up of the sepa-
raled cardboard. Commercial cli-
enls were urged to pal.Ucipate in
the program but, as a voluntary
effort, many clients fell the system
was too much trouble or did not
feel that they would benefit. In
January 1993, t.he city commission
approved a special incentive rate
for the corrugated container. The
cubic ynrd rate was ell'opped (on
the sepnrnte cardbonrd conta.iner)
from $2.60 to $2.25 pCI' cubic yard.
This offered a "savings" to busi-
nesses that generated corrugated
cardboard, thus rewarding them
for their recycling efforts. Revenue
gai ned from the sale of the corru-
gated cnrdhonrd is PIUiscd along to
the cOlnmcrcial accounts in the
form or lowcr monthly refuse fees.
The new incentive program has
stimulated other businesses to
participate in the separaLion pro-
gram, with Lhe number of pnrLici-
pants inel'cnsi ng fl'0111 42 in Sep-
temher 1!192 Lo a current 77 husi-
nc:=;ses. The colleeled tonnage for
conugatcd cUl"Clboard has also
increased IlS n result, of the added
incentive. Contnet: Nancy Bennett,
Hccycling Coordinator, Refuse!
Hecycling Office, City or Lakelnnd,
501 Evelyn AVCllllC, Ln\telnml, FL.
3:mOl; (813) 499-8774.
Awards Pl'ogrnm for Solid Wasle
Division Employees - Largo
(See Adl1lillislmtio1l' PerS01l1lel)
Commercial Drivers License
(CDL) Program - Largo
(SeeAdmillislmfioll- Persollllel)
Hecycling Thnnk-you Campaign -
Largo
....
As n follow-up to the city's ex-
panded residentinl curbside recy-
cling collection service, the Solid
Waste Division implemented a
thank-you campaign designed to
thank residents for their participa-
tion in the ci ty's Recycling Pro-
gram. (See 1992 City In1!ovations
Showcase, Curbside Collection of
Rccyclables, page 72.) Door hanger
bags were filled with holiday wrap-
ping paper made of recycled news-
print, information on the recycling
program, a postcard with infOl'ma-
Lion on the household hazardous
waste site location in the county
and nn update on the tons of mate-
rial collected through the Recy-
cling Program, The thank-you
campaign generated 300 phone
calls for more information and
mOI'e than 500 requests for curb-
side containers to be delivered to
homes. Contact: Chris A. l<ubaln,
Director, Public Works Depart-
ment, City of Largo, 225 FirsL
Avenue Southwest, Largo, FL
3tJ640; (813) 587-6741.
Solid Wuste Vehicle Repair und
Maintenance - Largo
(See Public War/iS - Comtrllctioll Qnd
Mai Illella lice)
A'ITACI IHENT C
,;.
.
'.
,
OJ
~
cO
~
~
Q)
>
.~
4-~
ro
~ ..,
CJ)
o r ~
CO
OJ
.~
;'.
I ,~":. .
, '
-
Florida's Advance Disposal Fee
A Fact Sheet
.....
Q: What is ADF?
A:, The Advance Disposal Fee i~ a one-cent fee which is charged at'Ule whole
sale level on certain containers sold in Florida.
On July 1, 1995, the ADF will increase to two-cents per c~nlainer.
Q: WIlY is it being imposed?
A: Florida's Advance ,Disposal Fee was created by the Legislature to meet two goals:
Q:
A:
Q:
A:
· To help develop markets for recyclable materials.
· To increase Ule rate of recycling in Florida.
What containers are illcluded in the
Advance Disposal Fee?
Cans · Bottles · Jars--- Beverage Containers
,Capacity: 5 ounces to 1 gallon.
Wl1.at Containers are exempt?
;-
· Containers used for medicine, medical devices, drugs or other medical items.
· Containers made of materials which are recycled at a rate of 50 percent or more.
Aluminuul and Steel containers have met that goal and are not subject to the
Advance Disposal 'Fee: ..,'
In the future, olher containers may meet the 50 percent recycling goal or ollier market
based incentives and will become exempt from Ule fee.
Exalnples of containers upon which the one-cent fee will be paid:
· Soft drink and alcoholic beverages sold in bottles.
· Food items such as mayonnaise or fruit juices sold in glass containers.
· PJc:lstic: bottles of 111otor oil.
. ',' " .;'
\\'1..,
, ,
'.'" . ,
:,
. ....., .
I.:: /'
'; ',' .. ".. ~
, ,
. ..'
. < ' '.
..
'.' .
'C;
4-.J
"cO
.....1(j
,..~
,', .
"
(1)
>
· ,..-1
"~
cO
1 ~
rJ)
.~
~,'.'~r\
..~
\'..~ \
..\JJ
~.
, "
":~)' :;."'"
:.; ;',
"
'> ,{ ..;" 1
,,';t>>>'
"
~ ,.
/....
,'. .'.~'..' ','
"J,' ;"
1)
· Various household cleaning liquids-like soaps,'chlorine bleach, ammonia-sold ia~',,~
plastic or glass containers. · '
""'
....i
.
· Vegetables and fruils in glass jars,
Q:
A.e.
, .
Q:
A:
~,' . .. ...'
. ,
.
'Will I.,as a. c.Ol1s~m~r of the.~e materials
.. ", ,
pay tllis ~~~?
Not directly. Wholesalers pay the fee.
, I-Iowevel', Ule cost may be passed on to you, the consumer.
How mucll nlolley will be collected.througll
tll.e Advance Disposal Fee and what will
it be used for?
About $23 million are expected in the first full year of the fee. Amounts
from subsequent years will depend upon several factors, including'
whether other types of packaging malerials have exempted themselves
from the fee. '
~. .
Uses: : I ' ,
· Envirorunental and Nalural Resources Programs, such as the Surface Water
Improvenlent and Management Program, or loans for local goverrunent waste
treatment facilities.
· Supplemental grants to counties for recycling and el1virorunent education.
· Improving markets for recycled matedals.
· Administrative costs of administering the Advance Disposal fee itself.
For Further Information, contact the Flo~ida Department of Revenue '
1-800~~LA-DOR1 (1-800-352-3671), then enter 1-2-2 for assistance in English'
or press 2 for assistance in Spanish. ., ....
. .. .......
, ., "
., ,.'.- :. ~ .' i
:1 ~ I ,,'
....1.Ja ~
. ,1t .-. Q
~_ J~~~
<t~- r_ ~...
4If#Today ~
""
~
.':"'1"''' "'>> ~~,~~<o"'''_...'_ .:~, ..
';,
"
"
, ."'! ~ : I
."
;, ~"l-::
':.,.,....
.'f, '.',,1.;.
.
,"i
,I
,
"
,
.' < ,;,: r' y . .';" . ,: << :' '. " ,1 -:'~~ ~:-:;"
.,~~." ,'..' >. ~,:<-',:f". "':',. "f ;
. ".',
>,.
'- . -. '" j;,';~
. "
. .' ',11
: .'
..',1
:~.I
--
SCOPE
. FULL SERVICE CITYWIDE
RESIDENTIAL & MULTI-FAMILY
RECYCLING WITH AGGRESSIVE
EDUCATION AND MARKETING
PROGRAMS
. .
. . .
. . .
c.
. CURBSIDE/SORT FOR
.
APPROXIMATELY 26,500 RESIDENCE,S .... .'
... MULTI-FAMILY FOR 230 COMPLEXES....
. PROCESSING & MARKETING
RECYCLABLES .
. .
, , . .
. '. , .
. '"
. . . .
. . MULTI-MATERIAL. DROPOFF CENTER. >.'
. COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS '
~ .' .
. ~ ' . .
; _t ., !
,; ;'
. ";' . }
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
RESIDENTIAL
- ONCE WEEKLY COLLECTION
4>> CURBSIDE/SORT - NEWSPAPER, ALUMINUM &
STEEL CANS, 3 COLORS OF GLASS, PLASTIC
MILK/WA TER JUGS & PLASTIC SODA BOTTLES
.... ,
- PROVIDE ONE 18 GAL. PLASTIC BIN
TAKE ALL ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL
. LEAVE WITH NOTE IF UNACCEPTABLE
l
c'
- EXTRA BIN - COST + $1.00 HANDLING
BIN TOTER - COST + $1.00 HANDLING
e "BACK DOOR" SERVICE TO QUALIFIED
RESIDENTS AT NO EXTRA CHARGE
, ,
, -- 7 ROUTES PER DAY (5 DA Y WEEK)
757 HOMES PER ROUTE/PER DAY
2 VEHICLE BACK UP
, _ MONTHLY FEE:
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
-
$1.99 $2.05 $2.12 $2.05 $1.99
., ";
. :~ . .
. ,<....
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
MULTI-FAMILY
. 230 COMPLEXES (APPROX. 20,000
LIVING UNITS)
. SERVICE TAILORED TO EACH
COMPLEX
. RECOMMEND NEWSPAPER,
ALUMINUM/STEEL CANS AND 3
COLORS OF GLASS
-,
. 90 GAL. SEMI-AUTOMATED CART
. SERVED BY ONE OR MORE CLUSTERS
OF SEMI-AUTOMATED CARTS
. RATE VARIES BY SIZE AND NUMBER
OF CARTS. IN EVE'RY CASE,
RECYCLING WILL BE A SAVINGS OVER
GARBAGE RATES.
, ~
~.
, .
. -
. .
'. . . .
.', .
, ' "
, '.' .-, ::. . ~
. " , t
", '.',' . - ~ ,< ,;. ,
"
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
MULTI-MATERIAL DROPOFF
CENTER
. ONE CENTRAL LOCATION
CONSOLIDATED AT THE SOLID WASTE
COMPLEX
. SEVEN DAY PER WEEK SERVICE
. COLLECT NEWSPAPER, ALUMINUM
AND STEEL CANS, CORRUGATED
CARDBOARD, PLASTIC MI,LKIWATER
JUGS, PLASTIC SODA BOTTLES,
SEPARATED 3 COLORS OF GLASS
AND OFFICE PAPER
. CLEARLY MARKED CONTAINERS
. EXPLANATORY SIGNAGE
. NO CHARGE TO THE CITY FOR
SERVICING-
--
" - ""
. .; '! ....,
',' : . '" '- ,-, ~. ~ \,.,.'.', :' ;"<;. ' ,
. ,..',' .,
~ f ~: '~....; .#;' ,~., .' ^ 1
. '. ..' ( . " ~ . ~
; ;,."
. . .
- ;' i' ., #
. .
~. '; ~ .
,', ., '0':' .
. .: ,'" '.:: '. .>. " :,.'~., ~'. :~. , .~., .'
, .',
,.... . " ,
. . .
, '.. .
'., ?-.' " .", ..., . " ,,' ";. r,
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
......
COMMUNITY SERVICE
PROGRAMS
. FREE MULCH FOR RESIDENTS AT
DROPOFF CENTER
. FREE COLLECTION. OF OFFICE &..
COMPUTER PAPER AT CLEARWATER' ..'
SCHOOLS
. FREE COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES
, AT COASTAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD
CLEANUPS
. .'. PROVIDE RECYCLING CONTAINERS
FOR SPECIAL EVENTS SPONSORED.
BY CITY
.. MAINTAIN & SERVICE CITYMARINAe:' .... '
MINI-DROPOFF CENTER
'.'1- .
~ <'. ,.I,'r, ',' .,
," . .
. " ...... ,
.' .,......'. .,' "". ': "
. .
, ' ..' .
. ,', . .
. '. .
, :' ~ 'i ~',.,I ',~;'
.'.:......, . . :..
.' . .
" 1'" ',.; 'r ""
,.. , ~ I f.
. ,
~ . , '
'. . . ,",:' ~ ~ " ' \' 1
,..: '"," ~ :; .
~ . . .
. . " . ~," ,
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
. .:!
..'
.' .. '.~;!
PROCESSING & MARKETING
. PROCESSING CENTER AT SOLID WASTE
COMPLEX
. SCREEN MATERIALS AND SHIP TO
MARKET
. THROUGHPUT PROCESSING SYSTEM
. 'DUMPING RAMP
. OPTIMIZE PROFITS
USE ESTABLISHED MARKETS
USE SPOT MARKET
PROCESS & MARKET FOR OTHER
CITIES
USE RAIL SPUR FOR MARKET
FLEXIBILITY
. ,.
.' , ',",
.' 1 .
.. .'.
, . .' .
~#.< '.' , '\~~"'~.'.'"
,. .'-.
~'li '.'
,';,i' ",,:/Y,t,i'
> ' ,,'j I'-;,~ ,,';.' . ,
, :, :\',~ > -::/i
0.....1
Z::f
wffi
a:~
I-~
I-~
~~
a:~
<(~
~a:
CJ)
-
a:ffi
<(~
w~
>-~
><~
roO
z
o
l-
ce
UJ
D..
UJ
()
-
cc:
D..
v
0>
0>
,.-
C')
0>
Q)
,.-
C\I
Q)
0>
,.-
,.-
0>
m
,.-
o
0>
0>
,.-
0>
CX)
0>
,.-
o
o
,-
~
o
<0
~
o
(0
o
V
o
C\J
~
,'''~' . .'
. - ,:. ..'
LOLOOO
(t)Ct)(Y)0)
.y:;r Yit YT Y)-
OLOOO
(\J(\J(Y)lC)
.y:;r Y?J- YT tit
OLOLOO
,.- .,- ,.-
.y:;rY?J-flttlt
LO~O
LO 1"-"-
.y:;rY?J-flttlt
0000
,.-,.-~,.-
.y:;r Y?J- fit tit
0000
,....,.-~lC)
.y} Y?J- fit tit
f + * +
0:0
UJa:
0..<(
~a.: 0 0
coC/)-
WOC/)r-
~a:<(CI)
UJ<(...J::)
Z()(!}a..
o
f-
CI}
:5
0-
~
0::
ill
0-
<(
0-
CI)
;:
ill
Z
o
ill
....J
<(
CO
(/)0::
0::0
Ou..
....J
OCl)
00
wZ
will
0::0::
If-
f-ill
0::0
00::
u..0-
wO
(!Jill
<(f-
0::0
Will
>J
<(0
0::
(/)0-
(/)q-
:50>
(!J~
fa
fa
fa
'" ,
".:1' ....-.\,:
0
q- CD
m CO
0>
T"'"' {It
0
('I) C\J
m f'.
m
T"'"' U7
0
m 0
<X) CD
m
T"'"' U7 0 . ...~.
Z
w
t (1)0:
0)1-
I
~ ~v
O)~
~ ::::> or-.,..
~ Z CI:o
Ow
- lJ..1-
~ ...J()
::::> <(W
-I ::J"J
1-0
<( Uo::
<(0-
O-J
z~
wffi
o::~
I-~
I-~
wm
~d
0::>-
<(@
~~
-
'0:
O::w
<(~
w~
>-~
><~
o
en
"
o
m
m
T"'"'
C\J
m
0>
T"'"'
, '"
, .
. '
, .
"
T"'"'
m
m
,....
, .
~. I
, .
,0, '
.< '
: .
"
- "
, .
z
o
......
a:
w
a..
w
U
-
a::
0...
o
o
o
...
or-
~
~
~
o
o
'"
Y7
o
CO
LO
Y7
o
CO
f'.
Y)
~
~
~
z
o
~
~tf")
""
~~
~""
zE:
I
o
""
~O\
=00
~E:
z
~
~
~
u
~
=
00
~
z
<
00
~
o
==
~
~
~
~
o
N
'P-f
~
o
'P-f
o
ClO
o
\0
o
~
o
~
~
Q\
M'
Q\
r=
~
Q\
--
,...c
Q\
~
~
0\
e
Q\
~
o
0'\
--
Q\
QO
r=
o
II)
ltI\C
C\ C\
"C\
C\ ....
NlI)
~
~
~
C\
....
~
I:'-
~
=>
I:"-
....
II)
II)
\C
II)
II)
"
~
~
C\
~
C\
....
\C
~
lI)
~
....
t'
t'
lI)
~
....
lI)
..
fA-
~
p
Z
~~
~O
=~
1':-
:~
, ",!
.',ct
.
r.n
~
!:Q
~
Q
~
E::
I-t
~
o
-~
'I)~
~Q
~~
~~
~B
"":;J
~~
~r.n
f-4Z
-0
r.nU
f-4~
So
~~
~~
~~
~~
Q~
~~
ZEJ
Oz
~1ooI
~f-4
~~
r.nQ
~r.n
Q~
dS
~~
~tS~
Z<OI
~~~
~OQ
~f-4....
"'" .
, ., t
, t, /
'. '
l' .
'1'" .,-.
,.
. ':"";"" <~\\,'. ''';'.. '..,.... ".' .'
RECYCLING PROGRAM
ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING
Residential and multi-family recycling programs will be staffed initially as
follows:
One (1) Recycling Coordinator (Range G)
One (1) Recycling Representative (Range G)
One (1) Supervisor (R-60)
Nine (9) Sanitation Equipment Operators (R-48)
One (1) Equipment Operator (R-39)
Two ell Maintenance Workers 1 (R-36)
TOTAL 15 positions
In order to accomplish the in itial staffing as indicated above, seven (7) new
positions will be required and eight (8) existing positions applied or
converted to conform to the recycling staffing table above.
. One (1) Assistant Superintendent of Solid Waste/Special Services
(Range I) converted to Recycling Representative (recommended Range
G).
. One (1) Public Information Representative (R-46) converted to
Recycling Coordinator (recommended Range G and funded in Solid
Waste).
.
One (1) Solid Waste Supervisor (R-60) remains the same.
",,',
. One (1) Sanitation Equipment Operator (R-48) remains the same.
. Two (2) Heavy Equipment Operators (R-50) converted to Sanitation
Equipment Operators (R-48).
.
Two (2) Solid Waste Workers (R-41) converted to Maintenance Workers
1 (R-36).
~ Six (6) new Sanitation Equipment Operator positions (R-48) will be
required (recycling veh icle operators).
~ One (1) new Equipment Operator position (R-39) will be required.
July 1, 1995, one additional Sanitation Equipment Operator (R-48) will be
required for the multi-family program.
. .
c
o
.-
tn
.-
>
.-
c
Q)
......
tn
cu
~
"'C
--
-
o
(f)
'-
Q)
......
cu
~
ns
Q)
-
o
'I-
o
~
--
<
~
a:
>-0
-ILL
-0
:2 a:
~c..
...!..~
1-<(
Sa: co
~(!)O')
clS~~
....Jc....t:
~(!)~
I-ZO
Z-.c
W..J+J
OO~
->-0')
(/)00')
WW~
D:::tt:
..Jtt:
...Ie:(
<(W
3]>-
>~
O~
w
>
-
u.
o
~I
ml
CD
(1)
(1)
T-
I.()
(1)
(1)
T-
~I
o::CJ)
<(..J
w<(
>1-
.0
LC)I-
0<0
o -r-
O)L{)
~
("')v
o -r-
("').......
or-
Y7
o ('i')
0) ('i')
or- ('i')
o <0
N.......
("')<0
"
or-
Y7
Ov
<.D 0
CO L{)
or- ('i')
o L{)
("')(0
...
Y7
l{) ('i')
0<0
0) .......
CO.......
C") (J)
... L{)
r-
fF)-
0') CO
('f) ('i')
V.......
r- CO
CO ('i')
0') l()
fF)-
--
or' N
--
U)~
Q) U)
:J 0
eU
CUC)
~ e
ct:+i
ns
- ...
ns CJ)
+Ie.
~O
v
CX)
('f)
-
0>
CX)
1O
.......
1O
CX)
('f)
V
<0
<0
l()
('I')
CO
V
<0
N
V
r-
or-
V
1O
-r-
o
.......
N
V
V
o
V
V
l{)
<.D
CO
N
en
Q)
:J
e
Q)
>
CJ)
0::
C)
e
I-
e
l-
etS
E
Q)
0::
co N~
o 0>
NO
r- -r-
0') N
N r-
CON
vO>
NO
l() <0
f'-..CO
N r-
(0 N
('t") (j)
ON
CO r-
c.o 0
NN
0<0
O-q-
f'-..l()
Nor-
LO<.D
N or-
CO 0
o l()
('t") CO
LO or-
-q-N
Nor-
ON
OI"-
L{) CO
Nr-
('4')0)
MI"-
-r-
--
M'lIl:t
....... -
en
U)+I
+J en
o 0
00
0-;
"tJ~
Q)c.
I~ etS
LLO
. I
o
en
CJ)
...J
tJ)
Q)
'u
c::
Q)
C'>
c::
:;:;
c:
o
U
L-
.E
Q)
2:
Q)
tJ)
Q)
L-
'"
f'-..
-r-
I.[')
N
CO
or-
"C
c:
ro
en
Q)
tJ)
c:
Q)
a.
x
Q)
0>
c:
:;:;
ro
L-
0>
a.
o
CO
N
o
Q')
f'-..
or-
c.o
Q')
CO
c.o
N
,-
en
L-
0>
c::
. 'm
(/)+-1
~C:O>
.oO(/)
ro Q ~
oena.
>. L- .
00> X.....
Q)+-IO>(/)
en Q)
L-. a. "C L-
If- E c:: Q)
o 0 .....
Q) :J .0 .s:
-0 "'0
co If- 0> c::
tJ) 0 g ttJ
Eenro-
OO>EttJ
L-en a.
..... co L-. .-
(/) .c: 0 U
~ u 'to> .s:
.,.." L- L-
Q):Ja.a.
L- c."O .....
o "c:: 0
a>~roc
c:: C.) c:: Q)
tJ)'C:.Q E
::J Q) +oJ >.
0. en g [
tJ) Q) .~ Q)
0l0>c::\-
c:: co . - "'0
:'=L-Ec:
:=CO"OttJ
.0 0> ro
E" (/)
0"0......
e Q) c: ~
..... .~ ro E
"0"0 Ol >.
2 I .c: ttJ
co en := a.
L-Q).QQ)
Q) C.)
C:.- Q)" (J)
Q)C:>co
Ol Q) .- .c:
+oJ 0
tJ) en ro \-
Q) _ L- ::J
co en a.
:J c: .-
~ 0 .5 ~
> ~ E ttJ
Q)Q)"OQ)
o::o..<(-.J
('t")
V
LO
LO
f'-..
E79 .
CO
c.o
o
-r-
-q-
f'-..
fA
Q)
:J
C
Q)
>
Q)
~
....,
Q)
z
g
.g
e
0-
M
m
---- ~
r- ('IJ C"') ~ 0
........... --.....,.. '-' '-" ....
....
,~' 0 .
" ,'1.'.
, .f ,V ~~.,. ~'{ '::
.' ;'
'.
,~
'.
. '.~
LEASE PURCHASE
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
RESIDENTIAL & MULTI-FAMILY
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
CAPITAL PURCHASES
. I
$75,000
75,000
25,000
$175,000
RECYCLING BUILDING
PROCESSING RAMP
BAR CODE SYSTEM
. .'
'$'548 000
" "
8 RECYCLING TRUCKS
, 50,000
$598,000
~,773~OOO
MULTI-FAMILY 'COLLECTION,
VEHICLE
NOTE:
BALER FOR COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY PROCESSING
WILL BE. PRESENTED WITH COMMERCIAL PROGRAM.
ESTIMATED COST $125,000.
I
i
, i
, . i
I
I
I
I
, ,
.,' "
~ " ~, '
. '" ,
, .
.' . ~ 1, .." :
< " J .' ~1
,.
" . '
, ~ '.' ;
. .~ .""
, ' .
"
,: . ~ '.
. ~. :
-. ".
1 '. ..
I ;,
-," .' '. ; ~
f; ,
..
, .'
. . . -
; , ~. ",. , . ,':
Yo .~ ""<.ie. .:y,)..,", ::.. '.',.~; .:-j.', ...'::.. '.J ,~. .'). ;: ~"-, ;" ..
SOLID WASTE
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
MONTHLY RATES
UTILITY BILL APPLICABLE
TO SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING
BEFORE
AFTER
e S.W. COLLECTION
$11.77
$11.02
_ DISPOSAL
5.28
5.28
e RECYCLING
1.99
_ TOTAL CHARGE
TO HOMEOWNER
$17.05
$18.29
NOTE: ACTUAL INCREASE FOR RECYCLING IS $1.24
, PER MONTH
,
','
,
, .
".I
.'
- .' .,' ,
d....
"~1
'~
,\
. <
MEMORA1\rnUM
'1U'.
;. I " . l'o .'
.... \ ~... 4 '7 .,'
l" (\\'/I\\tII~qtO\\j
.....,.t~ l1.. i :....,u...
PRESS
Date AU6 -1 9 \993
CITY CLERK
COPIES:
Commissioner Fred Thomas
Michael J~ht, City Manager
City Commission
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Recycling Bids
DATE:
August 19, 1993
The recycling bids take into consideration a significant number of factors of which price ~s
but one component. The bidding process was complicated in that many variables were taken
into consideration as well as the unknown impacts of a new state law that opens the door to
competition for commercial recycling efforts.
The city bidding against the private sector to provide services is a new concept to the City of
Clearwater, but not to other governments. It is a trend I hope is continued in the future.
In preparing the bid, the Solid Waste Department had to abide by certain rules. Among
these were it could not use contributed capital, it could not lose money, it had to pay all
costs that a private company would pay and it had to conform to existing city personnel
rules.
When the bids were received, they were reviewed by a committee consisting of city
employees Bill Baker, Kathy Rice, Bill Baird, John Scott and James McCurtain, the
Countryside Sears Manager. The city employees on the committee were prohibited from
assisting in the preparation of the bid. After significant review and discussion, the
Committee unanimously recommended the city as the first choice and Kimmins as the second
choice.
I did not bring the city bid before the Commission prior to submission because that would
have exposed our proposal and placed us in an extreme competitive disadvantage.
The Commission has the right to reject the city bid and instruct the staff to negotiate with the
second bidder if it is uncomfortable with any aspect of the city bid.
Unless instructed otherwise, the bids are scheduled for discussion at the September 16
Commission meeting where I expect the matter to take up several hours of meeting time.
Please advise if you need additional information.
"
" .
.'
. ..
CITY OF CLEARWATER
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4748
City Commission .
- I\ffiMORANDUM:
.' '. ... . I ,... . -, ..:~ ,.=:-. '- r..! .. ~ ......
TO:
Mike Wright, City Manager
August 18, 1993
FROM:
DATE;
COPIES :
SUBJECT: .
Fred A. Thomas, Commissioner
Mayor, Commissioners,
Recycling
________~_______A_________.___________________________________..___.________________________________________________
In looking over the numbers and the layout on the bids for recycling, I am confused at the
conclusions of Kimmins and the City of Clearwater as low bidders. The areas that create the
greatest confusion are not in the basic RFP Residential Curbside Commercial Recycling Program
overall residential service amounts, but in the subsidiary additional amounts.
I don't know how many residence, in total, are part of the program. I, can assume all must be
part of the program. I don't know what that number is. However, under" Additional Rate Per
Residence", waste management has no charge; Kimmins charges $1.00 per residence and the
City of Clearwater charges $2.00 and up. When you look at the multi-family issue, waste
management is, on average (}Ver five years, $1.97; Kimmins is on average $16.20 per month,
and the City of Clearwater shows no charge, although it certainly has a cost relationShip to it.
When r look at other costs, meaning the wheel-tote container, waste management supplies this
at no charge on a monthly and yearly basis. Kimmins charges $65 a year, per residence, and
the City of Clearwater charges $8.20 on the average per year, per residence.
That total alone, if 1 am interpreting it correctly, means that Kimmins would be charging
millions of dollars to supply the wheeled tote to each residencet whereas waste management has
no charge, and the City's cost over the anticipated life of the program of four years, is about
one million dollars. Those figures are not included in anything of your spreadsheet analysis.
Lastly, J look at the commercial collection service, where waste management has an average
charge of approximately $2.35 a yard during the five year period; the Kimmins Company has
an average $10.50 per yard over the five year period, and the City of Clearwater has a charge
of approximately $22.00 per yard. 1 don't know what the amount is anticipated to collect, but
those are also significant contributors to the overall cost.
Just looking at the basic residential service line, showing waste management at $3.3 Million,
Kimmins at $2.87 Million, and the City 'of Clearwater at $3.24 Million, is not the sole issue
involved. The spreadsheet analysis does not give clear and concise data for me to truly
understand,
pOd
82:t7t 86, 8'\: ~nCJ
. " ,. " ..",,J. ..' ',:,
., .
,'''', ,';
,. :' '.;, , -'
":' .
..
. ~,
Mike Wright, City Manager
August 18, 1993 - Recycling
Page Two
I need to know how many single family residences exist in the City of Cleam'ater. That number
is a multiplier against each unit. I have to know what is the exact number of multi..family
collection areas in the City, - That is a multiplier base number. Those numbers have to be
applied against all of the above listed data, and then avera.ged out over the cost of this contract.
I cannot believe, based on the size of the number, that I am guessing correctly, but I don't have
anything to go on, other than what is on this sheet of paper. Is it possible that Kimmins is going
to charge each resident under the contract $65 a year for the use of that wheel-tote barrel. If
so, and there are 30,000 residences in the City of Clearwater, that is almost $10 Million over
the course of this contract. Something has to be wrong in my math, or their proposal.
Regardless, the data is not clear on how to troly analyze this contract.
I further find it impossible for the City to negotiate with itself, without first being before the
City Commission with all of the facts of this issue. Before recycling is going to be approved,
it has' to be totally and opetlly debated and discussed.
I await answers to these questions, and then agenda the item with all available information.
, FAT/sr
S'd
, E2:t7t E6.. 8~ e>nl:l
. .,'" . . ' " \ . .' '. ' . . ' " '.
. .".t"
i,
"':' ~ .
- b
SEP-0B-1993 16:39 FROM CLW. CITY MANAGER
TO
MAYOR P.10/31
~
.. J ~ [~.J 1:" .,JU'
J..." ~ l~t.1 .4 .
"TO:
COlvnVUOStO\\
PRESS
IBte SEP 0 8 \993
CITY Cl..t:Hi\
FROM:
COPIES:
The City Commission
Michael 1. ~ City Manager
Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager; Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Recycling Contract
September 7. 1993
~ere has been some confusion regarding the recycling bids and perhaps this memotandum
will help c1arlfy matters.
After the results of the recycling pilot program were accepted, the decision was made to
expand recycling efforts on a city-wide basis to include single family, multi-family and
commercial accounts. Each of the three types of accounts rerelves a different type of
service.
It was further decided the Solid Waste Department, under the direction of Assistant Public
,Works Director Bob Bmmback, would be allowed to bid against the private sector. To be .
, oompetitive~ 'I placed certain restrictions on the city bid, which included: no contributed
, capital, the operation must be self-contained and operate at least at a break evert point; it
, must'adhere to city employment rules; and there must be a reasonable contribution to the
General Fund as well as the pay,nent of all costs. I also allowed the bid to not Include cash
depreciation of lease-purchased vehicles, a point I will discuss furt~er in this memorandum.
, The city bid was submitted along with the private sector bids. The review committee, which
consisted partially of city employees Kathy Rice, Bill Baker, Bill Baird and John Scott, were
riot allowed to review the city bid prior to its submission. Sear's Countryside Manager Jim
, McCurtain also served on the committee.
, None of ~ bids were identical. Mandatory service for single family homes is straight
. forward and simple. Multi-family service, of which there are some 20,000 customers vs.
26,000 single family accounts, is mOre complicated because it is an optional service.
, Collection must be by some type of container service and will vary greatly between high rise
., cOndominiums and mobile home parks. It is in this area that the greatest degree of variation
exists in the various bids.
, Commercial collection was .removed from consideration because of state law that allows
competition regardless of whether or not a franchise has been awarded.
.('":"\
'. .:/
, to:, ,,'
. ,
4., . ~ .'
., . ' .' ,
"
:-;-.",,'
SEP-OO-1993 16: 40 FROM CLW. CITY M~GER
TO
~YOR
P.11/31
.. ,
It
After a great deal of consideration, the Committee selected the city as the best qualified
bidder. However, there appeared to be some confusion on the Committee's part .regarding
the cash depreciation of recycling equipment in that there was the belief expressed by some
members that the city could payoff its debt and get out of the business if it proved to be a
bad business deal.
I have asked tbe Committee to reconvene on September 8 to reconsider its position in light of
tile clarification of the policy.
If the Committee stays with the current recommendation, I will be askin& you to review two
proposals: the city bid from a Board of Directors view point in light of risk-reward factors;
and, then if approved, as the City Commission to award the contract to the Solid Waste
Department for the service.
If the Committee changes its mind or if you choose not to go forward with the initiative, then
it would be appropriate to negotiate with the nex.t most qualified bidder.
I've moved the Commission agenda date to the first week in October to allow you a,
minimum of two weeks to review the information prior to making a decision.
Please advise if I can provide additional information.
.. , '"
:~:':..:. .'
,TO:
~'{I r ;';' ~,;' }~~'t",
\. .' \ ~ ..' . U.a
(;O~V!lV!lSScOI\1
fJf)~("t.~
ra:.\), )
Date OCT 15 1993
City Commission ~ IJ .. crrv CLthK
~ ;' ,)oc.-L~
Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager 1<[(,-K; .
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
COPIES:
Michael Wright, City Manager
SUBJECT: '
Recycling Contract
DATE:
October 13, 1993
I understand that Attorney Ed Armstrong is making appointments with each of you to discuss recycling.
He has asked for and received copies of the attached evaluations initially completed by members of the
Selection Committee for Kimmins Recycling Corporation and the City of Clearwater. These evaluations
were done individually. The Selection Committee then met on three separate occasions to discuss and
to rank how each individual rated. The final decision was a consensus of the total committee.
The committee had a meeting where we asked both Kimmins and the City to come in and explain their
policy on multi-family pricing, customer service, and commercial pricing. The committee then decided
to take commercial out of the bid process. The presentations on the pricing for the multi-family changed
several of the members perceptions. With this and the other information presented, the City was ranked
over Kimmins.
Also attached is the initial individual independent rankings by each member of the committee. Full
proposals and minutes of meetings are available in my office.
Attachments '
t.:. \"
,. '.' ~ ,"',
-' , :'.>: ~; .:, ".;.,};'l"; .. .". , .
.' ,
, ..
.:. ;~. '',;.'~.~, '"
~ ': '
'., {.
. ,
. ',' .\
,.',., .
. 'f
,," ','
,! ""
. . > '.' ,::'"i:.,' L.'. ,
,'I.
EVALUATION AND COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION COMMITTEE
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE AND COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
PRESENT: William Baird, General Services
William C. Baker, Public Works Director
Daniel J. Deignan, Assistant Director/DOAS
James H. McCurtain, 2829 Meadow Hill Drive North (34621)
Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager
John Scott, Utility Customer Service Manager
DATE: July 19, 1993
Individual, Independent Rankines:
RANK
1ST
2ND
BILL BAIRD
~
~~
\(~
~
BILL BAKER JIM McCURTAIN . KATHY RICE 'JOlIN SCOTT
WASTE WASTE AID
MANAGEMENT
BFI WASTE
MANAGEMENT
WASTE AID BFI
KIMMINS
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
BFI
3RD
KIMMINS
4TH
BFI
WASTE AID
5TH
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
WASTE
COLLECTION
SERVICES
INS
'"
\
KIMMINS
Jim McCurtain did not rate the City in his top selections because he had trouble understanding the City's p'roposal.
Dan Deignan: Based on a review of the financial information submitted, eliminate:
1. Boone Waste Industries
2. Disposall (Metro Recycling, Inc.)
3. Waste Collection Services, Inc.
All members agreed.
.
t".,,".,,", 'or':..""..
, ~. . .... .' . ' . .. ~. .
~
CITY OF CLEARVVATER'S BID
CiTY OF'CLEAR\\' A TER
REQUEST FOR CO~H)ETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDEl\:TIAL CURBSIDE and CO~1j\IERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA~1
,r"",
, ,
,
\
"
"~I
,
EVALUATIO!': CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
~/7,~
,
I 4.3 TECIINICAL and FINANCIAL EV ALUA TION TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERI A COhlMENTS \VORTH RA TING
r/ct,';Jr""r:;./ ( /);,:'r..-".' J f, .. /!F r ~'r (( ~{. ,~/" ,'oj, : t::,/.
Ad~uacy of the proposed overdll I~:. l/"/~ :. 1-' .., . )0
' "". .". . ~ '. .~ .. -
operational plan. );1-;..1:/ J7/-Th'" (~'.t:.I~ I.,' 1/,':. (, ':" I, ,!.:~ //l/~:'1 ,)';'f;
7 1;t!.IlJ :/-'::~ 7 I?/~'//.' .'~ ' . . I k/rf-," !..,- ~tl (t7De .,:l", ~I~r,.,' rr.:' J
. l "'11'/: ,I" , / ,.",-;:. r ~"""1(4.!-
1''';:'/( 7S7 I.',."....,."..,..., .,. . /It!#.,: ~'~b. . ~. I,'; leT u,;~.
\ ,.
Feasibili ty, operational reliability I M;:- - ,,\ 1 /". '. ~ ';', ...Utl. Oly/wpt ((.'S~ t,;J C '.,; 1 /f
y.:.'U!;-y . /o'/P, .? 6-).-a.' ,/ hJ,J. . 5 .,..
. ,n'..,"","
and sufficiency of the collection 9P d- eRror:; c-,; h",.. -r-,;..,r.:;- )
system proposal. /194 I Jlt ..."...:.:. t )# 1,),.".,'- r\'.! J ~ 'r ( /.
".'/'," ,">>-5 .,~' ri':'/.:,'" ~IJ :").'pl-,~ i '"
,..:.> Y{,~/ut:; 1;"/7': /. (i) . If}
Contingency capabilities of the 1
proposed collection system. ~~,:, J:-.':"n;; ,..../ " ",.(.., d.c )
I.., :-...., .' ,-; rt
/l'~};-)),'#:./'I... :," ....;.:'.;,' ~..:".". /c'"" 1 }. />' ? j-,,/II'(,.,,'M""
(P/.;/'('7?,'.I'V :51?Si7:"..rI r:/:"./(t:; ..~, " ~'-~:~ /,:.'~-.,~/..'
Demonstration of ability to 1 )0
comply and maintain compliance J
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability ~,l/1,.f( I Y):7 .
n'L:; /y.,.-:-r .:: i~'I:',. .:.(' P,IC'-d:r,,'.i: . 1 ..""
of experience to proposed .
~, '), -,.... I'" ._~ 51' r ::;.'.:t.,.', .'-" . ,~...i'" ;,-:'
conditions. : .'..~. : .:~ I' I.. I.. , " " I .. ..tJ
) 7'"P~.:: .',p':''"'l-~,p''''r.....'''...:"''~' t ~\'" '~".,' ' .
. . ,'. (.~ P2': ) ..,
Qualifications of key personnel. /, I )
. I ....' 'I. .f' 1 J ;./
;' " .' ...
I . r " ..
. "",
Repons from references. n .:~.~ ":~'" \0- 1 J-tsr r:;u; I r ;-i /r. ~ :') 1 ' I I
. ...... '. I ,
I
I Jf (,
, ...
Financial.strength based upon ,- '7: '-..- ,', ~.'.: ?. ~
.~ ...... ,r" 'J: /,.'.. :... ~ '''''_ 1
' , .., /
.... .. .
financial reports and other ~7
supporting data submitted.
Demonstrated environmental 1 ..' !
,
.
awareness, including the latest ,1
technology, cleanliness and ..
resources devoted to keeping
cu rren t wi th technology.
.
, -"rD'rAL W 0 R 1-1: 10 POiN l' s
. . , ,
,'''. I ~ ./ ,~..-. . ,- ;). I'>'l .
//,//Y/'.)'-'/""'- v /l "". t: .' ~. /'
~,.r . ...J, '" ~ ~. ,'~' ", ,....
'-~'-'I" ' ,~ ,J" ,':-- -:;:. -. ., '.~' /z/ ..) ,-":" . ,..
, ,.. ~,...,pl .. , i
.~,' .' I' , .. ."~ ," .~.
~'::-;ll'" ....-...', ." -'
.- .~. _' 1 /. /. .'
/1 ",:./ ," /, -,t" ..
/;..'} ........ __ C.!'..J'~M"};"~:'/l~";~" r:;'.'~:"_',.:.",'J.' ).-
~......-""'... .. '/~""''''I ...;. ,.. .:'i,
/' .~....-"'--,-.... , I',":~ -.....,."" - ./~.
6' ;"-:'''~''''/~'\' .,it" J-".,...,,
. ....' .
,fI# . ",'- '; . .:
./".. --.. .
.- ..
.. ,', ..,.
-
-.,. . .
"" ...-"1,.: ".";;. ~
, .
l~.j - .:....,7'.-", ,....~J .
.or',.' .', ..,,: i: / "
/)..~... r,',." "".
UJj.,..~l
J..'r'1 '/, - ,# ~,.. '.
f
,. t' .,''':,.!-.:- '7- r' ",- -';
"....1..,....'."... I.....';
.,.... .'
r
..,'
/,
,,. I
/1'\'
t~ . ~.
~"I. ..':, t.' ..
I
.-
, ,'.
.:) ,
"",!,'
CITY OF CLEARYt'ATER
REQUEST FOR CO~1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO;\1l\f ERCIAL REC\'CLI~G PROGRAl\1
.?
.r
.'
';
EV ALVA TJON CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.5 RATE EVALUATION
CRITERIA
a) Rates for provision of
residential curbside/curbsort
collection serv ice.
,.'-J
,.-
b) Rates for multi-family
collection service.
c) Additional rate per residence
for other than curbside (back
door, side door, etc.) collection
per container.
d) Rates for provision of
commercial collection service
(taking into account HB 461).
e) Other:
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
containers.
ii) Replacement of damaged or
missing containers,
Hi) \Vheeled bin toters
f) Provision of multi-material
drop-off center at solid waste
complex 7 days/week . _, . n~.,,, .
~"'~~f' ~,'/Vr /'..I~.i~" 5 'i r./;or:I..:J1~" f.
)},JS.~-:/.; 'Z.~:.,j""':i:: ..:///'71: / I r-.i'.r,
TOTAL 10 POINTS
CO f\1l\ tENTS
\\'EIGHING
FACTOR
RA TING
.-1
I. (, )
JllJ~ 1/';; .~.:: .
. p ,..t:' JJ
'I" It.. ,
t" . I ·
45%
"
-
tt:
J'....:::.-~,.. - I' ''''T:--:.'' ,';":- TOTAL WORTH: 10 POINTS ((15-
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided)
support for all claims made) and the overall approach taken.
,. . # f :" .~~
I 6;'''''':1...~~''
.. 1','"
-'0' .
I.'t"~, ') ...... . ,,: .~..
... t "
"
_=' ....f..r,.,. ':
')....:--....../ , ".'
J-j,o()
,
i
\
I
I
I
!
,
,
;1,['5 ~
1,;1
.J""\ ~ .,*. ,
,. '" . ~
.., '.' ' 7 I
. ' I r . I ., '<-..'
10%
Jo
I
,. ') I
,
,.
.' .
. .,
.. .......
,'~ ://01(';l
;:J>IC-,. /
.
?,92 ~~II'-
.,Jl r;tfl ~
,.}~.
LfV/i'~/.c/lV
13.) (J Ie. j..t 1/:: '
Il~~..' ,111)(;.111'"'/1 \',..:.-
:..'~' ,;''-:'';'(
5%
"tf5 9-1
/'~/lJ ..-1.(.'/.)' ,~,J " ?''''1''''''''' /'~.'--'
, #'VI '...,J ~ ._, .. ~- ..... .
30%
1
c7/ J
P, k77,t&')
'I .""'
, I " (."'> ..~, I . I
...,. "';1 ;/
4'P.IJcL,\1. .', r- 5 %
t "," ..,. r ,
~ I" i j 1 /;~( :.::~ r:n'f)/~,- "L .0,
/
~ )
/1/ ~
,. J)" 'J'" ''''';'-''''
",.:.;.:: ...,:.... ; .* ":;- .', r "'.. /...... ~ ','\;, ,.
11)(...,
/liP Co: ) r
.- .. ..i', ",. ",G..'
, . ;,""lOf'r tC:; . ...._..(.1,)/ "
, '. I/~'?
I "
('. (..~.: ~
( t'.. - ( , ,
/W ?"/"lri/rt6e
5%
.-
~ I
'J
111.::?/l",."'7?74(."-:';" J':-H.O '::;"'1: !,. './;'
~,. .
-; 1),(' _' ..~l . ;.:-c'! "
. c.. .".
r:'~.t),/' /"','/',/'Jf
,,-/ I c.. " ". --.,-...",'"'\
~/../...... ,..~ ....,:. ;~. ".' .,',
.. _ -". --', ~ '",t':".;"
/.....1 ,I': ~..". ,., -"- \
- .'
/.... , . .
,.c:;(~':'~,_.
-.. , .
, ~ .__ I
. .:. '" I
:;:..':>/1::/ )!,/ .;....:, -" ~.
.... ',:' /. I.. '..:'1 .~: ,_ ,7:..... ','
!':':~ J ./_,' l r.
.: ,.;,-:;...".: or" ~. ,. .'
, ~ ..
~:-J ,// ",',
, .
J
:..-t
.1
/""A - /~ '-'I /,'''',,1 c' ';.1.1 ,: . I
~........ "'1"'" ,. . r. _ . I
lO
I
"1..
CITY OF CLEAR \\' A TER
REQUEST FOR C~IPETITIVE I)ROPOSALS
RESIDE1\TIAL CURBSIDE and CO:\1J\tERCIAL RECYCLlr\C PROGRAt\1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RA~KI~G I)ROCESS
4.4 AGREE~1E1'.T EVALUATION
10 POlf\'TS
\, e l\
\ -....., '.'
I -..",
. .
14.6 COMMERCI~L SERVICES .' 10 POINTS I (J
) fJ (Mil ~., -'l~.r.'. J 7/ ,~:.. ,)7:L.<'.://'A::> - r /oWi'" "r / pj:;-/r rJ,'1:) /:C -:;?", -'-~., prr4",,-, r ^, ",:; . I
) I-/" Ll ....-:> ') ~..-..- ( ,- ':..'. ., . . ') 1'/
,hiJ/( ~dC.,I{ t1('~a./'I'./r 'dJ/2I)I.::f.~rf(.../"'T'~'/~'(-;:'rf":-' I /'V J._~I/.' :::'':''~I/)',,::' /.//
D!hV1fDl/I;' 5
.!.lIV.)/Ooh
rJO .~r
491tT':;
/ .') .) ..-.,..' .:/" \ I.', ",~'c r r;.
:.~ '_ '--" "r... ~ '. I.>; .' f.., I' '~I .
;?9lf6l' -",1.,)
./ J -'(.-t/ '.)' (,) ~.~ >;., ) t" :,'. /11 ' /
I
~A!L/':='/) /:7_) ~? rlC'(!;)/',,//-- :-,,,,:,,,,)
Jd..:; "..;:.:. ~ 51 "~'/:'" /./ ?"? li't'
(:'/9=/(-( / :,y.... 1 I/.) ~ ...:,;; r-
~o/;:j()6( ~7 /'1;,D /;;-~ t..'::'~'l"f. ,-:-.;~:7i!;') !At:?// /e
, I .,,,~JI,- '/~ .") .,." 5.... /)F; ...... ..;C,l I, /(
y.:'.' ~'>' _.'N, .'. .' '" \, ...' ,
... t I' '.,.- ...'
I ~.l { :" -!-::: ;-.....T2-. /..1" r' .'
.'-'-'1_'
~........' ~ I'
~')~ 'J r'lll 11..'1"
l (!ik'/i'
u:..'/ ,/'-;'.', > "" ..' ,-,',' ,
- '" '. .'1' f ..,
,:}/.:: '>':;(',-,) ..~V-;- /i'/'''/ .~f7i '" 1./ il"/'::; (f. ./;;/1....:.:.:
4.7 COl\1~1UNln' SERVICE EV ALUA TION
10 POINTS
'I,
11- ,,).....,) ,. .....),..:,?./.....'"
~v" ."V _' ~~"F....~~ I
, - /'" '7".- . . --,. .
_)) ;.'/~' . t. /0, fl'.. -', ..- 1',1 J,t-;..' . J: /1."
'.. .,.... . .
, ,.-'- /(. -.
\ 'I ..'~' . . - ~.. - ( . J I .
. """', "" ,.... . ,. ~
/1"" ).- ~ N . ~.........., "...r:::~....;.'::';,-:-::$ ~l- ..... ~. /- I -/ ',-- ') i' J:'; .'.. -L, ",' f
(;........-...... (,... ...."..-- -.',' " "..., />1. ~ /". n.,....; ~. /I /,'"/''''' ,. ..... ...
,/) - ~' ,.-. ..... - ...... '" " ". ) ,-r
p/"- .."..f." ~..-"(,..-,,- .;_'........":I.!. t:.',.'.*:"',...)/(/~>,,- .-.
~~.,..Jf/,..,.,..."I.., .." ",,/,':: /."'/1', ':'..- . ...-:.,;....-"'=. .-.... /....../.,#.,,-,- .,",","'J ".,.,'
rl.L, ..).....-'..- , _ ." /, I ~.' '/,/1 ., . ""I,.' ",} .":,,,',., ,/ . '.-" ... ~,.'. '.. . .
/..,)1'.....,/... ,." .
\..... - I.... ..' "....... " ....,/.~..J.~~~.I'.""', .,..,....!~/.., .,.....~".,/')~..~)..'.;:.., ...-;~~. ..-.,.
, l""" .. -. ~ -". . ~ -' I
",,8
~ ""').' '."" '.
I J( -..' ,..... '/~':' -~' ~ .....
-
.. ~/-
.,,__...... ...,.-: I, ,.' ..'r'" ......-: . _.-:: 1." ,...,.,.. I ,'-/#~...,,*, .
t..... '.";'/ ......... .r-'..::,~. ,,""~' ..: /,. .~. / ..'.: 1'..
--
.~//.. /.:.";~',.-.--,.~~ ..........
.
I,}T
~
.... ,......, <
:'-: p..{ -~.'_...... .....,: ,"..
-:~l':'l. '~:,' ~
, ..-=, . .I-~'
,
.,#)" '. t.;' oil.>,..';";
,/, I, .' -'
.. .. ..... ' I I' \
. I.. .. .'"
~,'~'...' i 1,' ,/'
. '.
"
o ,d~))
.,.-,- ," ;'"""1, _ . ..../'_ .;....;. ,I
.:r ;/. ,:'. ". .' . "/
" .
./ ..' .. .'.'. ..
. . ~
CITY OF CLEAR\\'ATER
REQUEST FOR C().\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDEf\:TIAL CURBSIDE and CO~IJ\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROCRAJ\1
EVALUA TrON CRITERIA and RANKING I)ROCESS
4.8 RANKING PROCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE) ,
. .
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
d.) Commercial Services
"e.) Communit)' Service Evaluation (CSE)
TOTAL SCORE:
4(fFE) + 4(AE) + G(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + 1 (CSE)
"
"
7/-1
CITY OF CLEARWATER'S BID
CITY OF'CLEARWATER
REQ(!EST FOR CO~1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDEl\TIAL CURBSIDE and COM~tERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA1\1
EV ALUA TI01\' CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.3 TECHNICAL and FINANCIAL EVALUATION TOTAL ]0 POINTS
CRITERIA COI\fI\1ENTS \VORTH RA TlNG
Adequacy of the proposed overall ., I
...
operational plan.
0 ,-
Feasibili ty, operational reliability, 1 \
and sufficiency of the collection
system proposal.
Contingency capabilities of the 1
proposed collection system.
Demonstration of ability to 1 \
comply and maintain compliance
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability 1
of experience to proposed
conditions.
Qualifications of key personnel. 1
Reports from references. 1 \
-.'
Financial strength based upon 1 )
fi nancial reports and other I
supporting data submitted.
Demonstrated environmental 1 I
awareness, including the latest
technology I cleanliness and
resources devoted to keeping
current \yith technology.
, TOTAL \\'ORIH: 10 POiNTS
,"
.1
" .
c.
(p
.. ':
" <~. . ~':. ;. \. . .'. ~." .'" :. . , , . ~ ' .' ~. I D ,". ' ' . .
CITY OF CLEAR\\'ATER
REQUEST FOR CO~lPETITIVE PROI>OSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COl\t~1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA1\t
EVALUATION CHfTERIA and RANKING PHOCESS
4.5 RATE EVALUATION TOTAL ] 0 POl~TS
CRITERIA COI\1l\1ENTS \VEIGIIING RATING
FACTOR
a) Rates for provision of 45%
residential curbside/curbson
collection service. - . ~{(
-/
..J'
b) Rates for multi-family 10%
collection service.
. -J ,1
c) Additional rate per residence 5%
for other than curbside (back L\
door, side door, etc.) collection ~
per container. .
d) Rates for provision of 30%
commercial collection service /
(taking into account HB 461), ~ \ .~
e) Other: 5%
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent I
containers. l~
ji) Replacement of damaged or )D
missing containers.
iii) \\'heeled bin tOters .. ~ ",.
f) Provision of multi-material 5%
drop-off center at solid waste I
complex 7 days/week J'.' 1 ,)')
TOTAL WORTH: 10 POINTS
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided,
suppon for all claims made, and the overall approach taken.
: .
./
.J
. :' . ,'r. '~: '. ' .; ':'~
, '\" '."
.' \ "
. <
~ "
, ; ',:
. . . "
, . 1 .",
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
REQUEST FOR C(),\lI>ETITIVE PROI:'OSALS
RESIDEr\TIAL CURBSIDE cUld COt\1J\tERCIAL RECYCLlSG PROGRAf\1
EVALUA TJON CRITERIA and RANKING PHOCESS
4.4 AGREEJ\lEl\'T EV ALUA TJON
]0 POINTS
. "
I 4.6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
4.7 COt\1l\IUNITY SERVICE EVALUATION
I \ , (~ \ .... r C' (' "') ?
vV \'"{o" ..., ..l..( '" ,-., J C ~l' ~\_"_ . ,
rt-
10 POINTS I
'6
10 POINTS
~
; / ..' ~.
. . ,. ;"
. .
.,,r,', ."
. . \'
. ~ r.
'" ,
. ~: t
, ;,
" , ~.
,:',
. " ".,.., \
. .
. .l
:--..' .
,,':
.. ~
. .... \
-,.......'0-.,. .', ','
,: ,",
, ~,:,',,~,,"..,_.:.::'. ..,:~:...~,)>, ~.",::(;.., .-r ,,',,' ,.....
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
REQUEST FOR Cc>.\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO~1~1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAJ\f
EVALl1ATJON CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.8 RANKING PROCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE)
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
d.) Commercial Services
e.)
Community Service Evaluation (CSE)
TOTAL SCORE:
~ 4(TFE) + 4(AE) + 6(RE). + 2 (Commercial Services) + 1 (CSE)
'Jill ~ )
1~ +3'1
+-Lf [Z) t ~((.,f..) t 2- l~ ') 1- 8 ::
1-- 3'1. (" ~ I f:, 4
........-... '..,...,---.---....
'/' ..... ......
~ ~( \ \ q L... '.\
\. II ..".." .
'- ------.,
,
6~~ ,~f..T\
, ,
"
i
'i
"
'J'
CITY OF CLEAR\\'ATER'S BID
CITY OF'CLEAR\VATER
REQUEST FOR COi\1PETITIVE PROrOSALS
R.ESIDE!\'TIAL CURBSIDE and COMMERCIAL REC)'CLI!,\'G PROGRAJ\1
)~ ; ~
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
I 4.3 TECliNlCAL and FINANCIAL EV ALUA TI01\
i CRITERIA I COl\IJ\1ENTS
TOTAL 10 POINTS
\VORTH
RA TrNG
Adequacy of the proposed overall
operational plan.
")
N
---.
\..../
Feasibility, operational reliability \ ( 1-:.. 1 I
and sufficiency of the collection \"....\
system proposal. \
Contingency capabilities of the L) l L--' ~ ~) I..~' \( ~.I.....I') 1 J
l. " 1- ~
proposed collection system.
Demonstration of ability to
comply and maintain compliance
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability
of experience to proposeD
conditions.
qoocJ:
1
(i
~~CC..
1
Financial strength based upon
financial reports and other
supporting data submitted,
~-.~, I- ~ 1 \
. .'
---- ,--'
- ( ./ 1
UL- ,
, , ....
(;.1 I 1
. r. ,,", . ,
. '.0....... .
....:;,_. -' -. -
l
Qualifications of key personnel.
Repons from references.
.' .
Demonstrated environmental
awareness, including the latest
technology) cleanliness and
resources devoted to keeping
current with technology.
\. . ........
(v -'
..
1 '..,~
, I
\
. .
1
"
u
'fO'lAL \VURfH: 10 P01NT~
.' J
\.. . {
,
CITY OF CLEAR\\'ATER
REQUEST FOR CO~1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COJ\1l\IERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAJ\1
EVALVA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.5 RATE EVALUATION
CRITERIA
a) Rates for provision of
residential curbside/curbsort
collection service.
b) Rates for multi-family
collection service.
c) Additional rate per residence
" for other than curbside (back
door, side door, etc.) collection
per container,
d} Rates for provision of
commercial collection service
(taking into account HE 461).
e) Other:
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
containers,
.
ii) Replac~ment of dam~ged or
missing containers.
iii) Wheeled bin toters
f) Provision of multi-material
drop-off center at solid waste
complex 7 days/week
TOTAL 10 P01~'TS
CO" 1 "1 E~'TS
. (
, 17~, \~\
~ t l,'~(.> 'I \
C'':'', \. .- , I I ~- ' 1")
,'''' i ..\ . ~ ~
i-, (-. - .... I.j' l\ : \, '7\
\ I,' -' / 'J' "; J
.../ \ .../" /7 '
y\'~ lP' /'
\\'EIGHING
FAcrOR
RATING
~"
45%
- (\
,,-( ~,-'
I \ I '
i .\-\"., '.
""~ ....
"
10%
,-,,~
-'
"
.'
1"---"
~
",,-
. :.-. ",' .
"
. '
I, '
"< t'1.f.\ ,__,
..J 't-~ -
I ,.,. ~ \.,
~~,-..:,\....
--
;..... .
\
5%
~
'\,'\'", '- \ .o,
! . '.-
'\ ,-
. " I
\ .
30%
z~
......'1
.....
.../
:
^ ,'", - I
I '. ''"- . t"
I . ,
\ ~,
, I ~ \,-. --
\", ".-'
'.....il
{t
".
.. ....
I
........
....I
5%
5%
. \-'\ :. ~
r
..
-~
-j
!
, I.
\ : ," I
. l:'-'
TOTAL \\'ORTH: 10 POINTS
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided,
support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken.
<t
l-
\
\
\
I
\
\
I
j
'. . . r . . . ,..' ... ~, '" I,. .' " '. . ". ." t' .
. " ", "
.'
"
~ '.. ' " .
"
" ,
'\' .
". ,. ~' , .
J .",
. <;.
"
',,-, ,.
r_.:' :}"" ...,.t',' .':;",,', .,,:,', " ".' '.
CITY OF CLEAR\\'ATER
REQUEST FOR CO:'\lPETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COt\1l\lERCIAL RECYCLI!':G PROGRAJ\1
EVALUATIOS CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.4 AGREEJ\{ENT EVALUATION
0"
,
, .
I j L ~ '
:\.. l. ,
~; \
I.
\
j
.1.. ,-
, '\
lc 1\'
<1,)yO, :
G)~
-
.14.6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
. r ,/
-.... \. ;~.
. '. f
," j ; .c.-.--.
'. t./ .
4.7 COl\1J\1UNITY SERVICE EVALUATION
,-{J, () ~t.- I~ uJ~ e:)r-- r I. ,
~ J: I' "f''';
T'2. '.{ 1\ (, -\ '_..1.': ,I. \.. ... '" I
(: 0 t '\.~ ' -- i \ I
f\) -C.I. ': (\. h (.' I' \,.~' ('. t..
10 POINTS
. .
I (
....
I, I
V ...
. '
10 POINTS I
10
o
10 POINTS
/.....! I. "
. ,-
j 't
I I
,~ I /,:
I I. I.. . ...
\ -----
'.;' .
" ,
''"'", .~! ..
, ,\.-'... L.._
"
i \,. :-
" I
..,I ....
. \_f, ~ I ,
l' ,
-
.f ....
, ,
,
; ,,,.~: ".I
" .
.t"
J
.~.;
"
!, ',:
~r. <"
- -." ~
:'.':
~'. - .. .'
"~!I
i
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
REQUEST FOR C().\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and C01\I1\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA1\f
EVALVA TIO~T CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.8' . RANKING PROCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE) . ,
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE)
.
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
d.) Commercial Services '.'
". .'
e.) Community Service Evaluation (CSE)
TOTAL SCORE:
4rrFE) + 4(AE) + 6(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + 1 (CSE)
oPb -t 3b t 48 J- 20
-1-
! :')
. '''''.
..-
-
'.' ". .,.....~.,t\ .
u ~. {..;t, .
\ . ._,,1' ,
.. ...
~ .' " ,
.' . I'. .
4.3 TECmHCAL and FINANCIAL EVALUATION TOTAL 10 POlNTS
CRITERIA COM1\1ENTS \\'ORTH RA TING
Adequacy of the proposed overall 2
operational plan. - z..
. .
Feasibility, operational reliability, 1
and sufficiency of the collection I
system proposal.
.
Contingency capabiIHies of the 1
. ...
proposed collection system. - ,., I
, .
.,.
Demonstration of ability to 1
comply and maintain compliance /
with al~ applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicabiIi ty 1
of experience to proposed I
conditions.
Qualifications of key personnel. 1 (
Reports from references. 1 I
., ...
Financial ~trength based upon 1
financial reports and other I
supporting data submitted.
Demonstrated environmental 1
awareness, including the latest !
technology, cleanliness and
resources devoted to keeping
current ~'ith technology.
I TOTAL WOR ~H: 10 POINT 5
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
..
,...
CITY OF CLEARWATER'S BID ~. ,,1 { 1SD4.~
CITY OF~CLEAR\VATER c;
REQUEST FOR CO~1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COf\1l\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAl\1
c.
(/<?::J
.f () /
I '
\.
\",-",-
;, " . '. '/ ' -I .. . : . " , : " '. . ,,'....' , ,'.' . '. - . ' !. ~ " .. .: " " \
...
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR CO~1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO~II\IERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA~1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.5 RATE EV ALVA TION TOTAL ]0 POI~"'TS
COMMENTS \VEIGHING ,
CRITERIA RA TING
FACfOR
a) Rates for provision of 45% if
residential curbside/curbsort
collection service. . .
b) Rates for multi-family 10% )
, collection service.
. . .
...
c) Additional rate per residence 5% ~
. for other than curbside (back
door, side door, etc.) collection ~
per container.
",
d) Rates for provision of 30% I
commercial colJection service
(taking into account HB 461).
e) Other: 5% y
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
'. - L...-
containers. .
ii) Replacement of damaged or
missing, containers,
iii) Wheeled bin tOters . ~, ..,
f) Provision of multi-material 5% j,
drop-off center at solid waste ~
complex 7 days/week
TOTAL WORTH: 10 POINT
S
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provid_ed,
support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken. /.- ~
". ., .'
I '0 ..
~
,
l
. . .' ~. " J."~,. - I" I' . .
" . t ' . .',. '. ~ ~. " . .. . . ..
, ..~ ."
1._,. '
~~
; , ~ ~
, . .-
< t'. ~ .
...
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR C0\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COl\1l\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAl\1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
14.4 AGREEMEf\"'T EVALUATION
10 POI~lS I
. .
.1,"
. I
, J
, .
. 14.6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
10 POINTS I
14.7 COMl\ru;NITY SERVI~E EVALUATION
10 POINTS I '
,
- }
"'.
'" '
.',- :~.. .~,; " !
, ;_ " : 1,' ,".' .~, .~
, -
'i
; ~ .' '"
. . 'c' 'j'
.d ~,
,- " .., '.
'.' J>
'," 1..1
. j ~ '., I
. . .!
., ...
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR C01\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COMT\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA1\i
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.8 RANKING PROCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (A~)
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
. .
d.) Commercial Services
e.) Community Service Evaluation (CSE)
.
TOTAL SCORE:
........
~(TFE) + 4(AE) + 6(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + l(CSE) .
. (1) (;0)'; Y0-) {c,)(?t ) f-("G)(sJ +(j/~D) ~
, .~,
120,
~ . " '
./D
"7 U
t/
...;./
I .)
/:j
" /0/
~.S '
" . ....,
-
, . .', " ~ . . ,. ,
'. ,-, ..
I
I
.
~
9
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER'S BID
CITY OF~CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR COl\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO~fftlERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAl\f
EV ALVA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.3 TECHNICAL and FINANCIAL EV ALVA TION \0 TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERIA CO!\1MENTS WORTH RA TING
Adequacy of the proposed overall 2
operational plan. 2
- ..
Feasibility, operational reliability, 1 J
and sufficiency of the collection
system proposal.
. .
Contingency capabilities of the 1 I
.proposed collection system.
Demonstration of ability to 1 .. f
comply and maintain compliance .
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability 1 J
of experience to proposed
conditions.
Qualifications of key personnel. 1 I
Reports from references. c;:l"r01 e.Ii....I.:I~ 1 ,}
... .
'"
Financial strength based upon 1 I
financial reports and other
supporting data submitted.
Demonstrated environmental 1 f
awareness, including the latest
technology, cleanliness and
resources devoted to keeping
current with technology.
, TU.l AL WUR Ii: 10.POiNT,'
~
., ." I " . - \. . ,.'.
~ . , . " .' .' ~ ' ...', .
, ,
, -'
..
t6
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR CO~PETITIVE PROPUSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO~1~fERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAJ\1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.5 RATE EVALUATION
CRITERIA
CO l\I1\1ENTS
{..p TOTAL]O POINTS
\\'EIGHING RATING
FACfOR
45%
~'11 1. ~
a) Rates for provision of
residential curbside/curbsort
collection service.
. .
b) Rates for multi-family
collection service.
10%
7,2-%
. ..
c) Additional rate per residence
for other than curbside (back
door, side door, etc.) collection
per container.
5%
5~
d) Rates for provision of
commercial collection service
(taking into account HB 461).
30%
J,8%
5%
'~./~~
e) Other:
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
containers.
ii) Replacement of damaged or
missing containers.
iii) Wheeled hin toters
f) Provision of multi-material
drop-off center at solid waste
complex 7 days/week
5%
~%
TOTAL WORTH: 10 POINTS
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided,
support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken.
,
.. i. ":" ,to. .' ." . ., : ~ " r:: . ,', ..,' '. . ~.: .' ...:' ,"\ I' n " ,-'~\ . ......' _:.", ' \'.. . .'
"'? - <
. 1::. '
'. '" . ,I
. '.'
. .'~,: .p;'.., _. i;; '.
I ' " ~
;,
: '. ~.. ~.; ':'i.' '. .." . ';.'.. :f ~'.: .; f
~ #t
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR C0!\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COl\1l\IERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAl\1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
14.4 AGREEl\{El\T EVALUATION 9
]0 POINTS I
. .
'.
. I
I
.
14.6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
Y'.~ &~.,.~~ v.... ~.~ ~ ~ -
9'
10 POINTS I
, .
, ,14.7 COMl\1UNI1Y SERVICE EVALUATION
1~1rV~~ ~ CJ:l~~
e~ ~~~.l,J.) ~
?..rfJ PH - ~ ~..oo Q...?
Qt7~ C)'...l ( rr,t-lA6~- Go-J'\.O"~ ",Q 1~'6 '-..c\,,.,.. ..,:.; ! . tu-
'\ ~ ~ c.3.J.:) ~"l.:..,(~r....tt'-,.e..c:'Y -l..........--.o--..-'.
\ I {, I( f-
i (:t.-\ I ~~, Ol..)~(!..,) (\,.... A-v''-
I {/ 10 POINTS I
, ',:
I
I
I
I
!
,
\
.
l~;::' ') KI!\Il\lI~S REC\'CLI~G CORPORATION
l \ CITY Of:. CLEAR''r'ATER
. . REQUEST fOR CO.\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RE.SIDE~";TIAL CURBSIDE and CO:\I!\IERCIAL RECYCLISC I'ROGRAl\l
\. .
.., H'
.)
r'
I /}
! r-
EVALUA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
13,;2
4.3 TECHNICAL and FINAI\CIA L EVALUATION TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERIA CO~1~1ENTS \VORTII RA TING
t;:t.pl.""! , ....-:- .... ,-
Ad~uacy of the proposed overall {). ., A" r."
/1> ~<') I././.. .~ ~_..' .." , .., 9
...
operational plan. 7P ..h{0,..,. t' :; ~/'W Lr/ /~...-"J1
/)70/)..7'/ JV;.y,'.:... I, ~
-- ;'7.'.:.)',<,; JC:i /y",~ /-./.JI.;...~1
7 -1:' I ' . / .::'; /1) /"-;-:',;/ C/( ~I'tIJ;'""cJ .....1,.. I.. ~
""
to, .- -
7.',1'0 "l.')1 - ~ P,,1 I efl ,. .'..; (".
Feasibility I operational reI iabilit y, ./ft'$,''(/( ~tr; / "I--p.' .... "/
1:>0 'h 7 _l.O:> , 1 9
/;;-p h'LY .; r...i<O- <5 ./.~ ..J ..':.:.' ........:.....~ 'J
and sufficiency of the collection 1"",:- 9
Cy:./;/fe''-:'~ (~) 'I r frh7rl I:;,,'~ ,. ,
system proposal. /\ lrJ!...l: l-r
/::/',N..~,J... J (#'.'c.^ .,':'-~' .. ~);J"? ,'-. ";. I
tY..r,.t.,.,...IE ". ''-il ~ ~. /., t- )- .. :-1. ' -' 6w.5 ? 1t1.:.:: 1//C,t,;n.J,.' :
:....:> ,,- . - f7l:'~~.",."I;/
.
Contingency capabilities of the .5';:' rj') ': ~ Fe,.:, 'Iue ;.... i/ h'1/..J::~:': ~ 1 (~/
proposed collection system. (,:::"/J,'M -r;r(,c I'::' /,1:' .I.~/.'.',..., 'f. ,~ 0
/l/,tcr') )
...i:~1":'::; n.:'~~':... . ;',: I.....,': :'(/..:
('.J5 /".0 ,-' .', I {)L- ""/;;.'1' 1/> ('1.'"',' ,
Demonstration of ability to /~ ;,':":,.<!t cr - ':J.I n'::~ 7"/-; /,;;/1 '.-:' r'{"( 1 t
'l.' ? J.'~"r"" .,'
comply and maintain compliance.. .'/ .I- I......, ......' ',.,.- - ~;t:.."..^ ~ (" };. "" ,..- U t
. . '" ... "')~/..
"]j"J,,,'r- ~.'.r fl . ...
with all applicable ordinances, :/ /./-I ,"'.'I( "~'''5'" .... ~,'('// ':,""/!'. .
,...- , 1. I. '." "1' ., -....... . f,- ::' ,. 1': .
rules, and regulations. I'-.L 9 ." ,. ,.... ,c...,~.., ".,... ....,.;...... C
JI #,~~;I~ ./ '\, , ell,.. 1('
J'l( .'-
Past experience and applicability /,'::r,~...."',.:""J. . 1 ....J
r;:' //~: 9 ~.." .,oJ ...::'7/ -:"!~ :.:I /
of experience to proposed . . l '" ,7
~/ ,"it.: ...:.:....... ~''''I -:J ....;;:.. i:~
conditions. :) . . /.;;~.!. ''',. ,-;.
. ' -
f/~';.$ th't .h " . / ,~:, ,;JhI'". (! /l
Qualifications of key personnel. =,,,'.~ 1 7 I
,
!~ ' .~l".',/) ,," ..' . .r '.,1. t . " I
, ':~i '" f . .' . \.
~~'JH'. I ~ -
Reports from references. r:?-' ..-::. ," ~. : :r - f" - : 'J" . I 1 7
--. . . . I
.-- ~ ,1
' .
, ... .'." . .-
,-=' .....'. ..... -' , ....,
Financial strength based . . . . ,"'/" ..'.'. ,0' J
upon - 1
If
financial reports and other r :' . /1 - .' /
- ; ,..". ."
supporting data submitted. " /' - "r ..... l' ...J
.
, -:..7,? I' . ;,." j
,-'" ,.. '1- " .' -
,i t. . ! . ' .-r I ~.
i 1
Demonstrated en vi ran men tal .: .) ., ./ I . . .- 1.1 . /' ... , 1 !
,'- I,,' . t, . , ,
awareness, including the latest /, -".: ..... , - I (r ;', (
technology, cleanliness and J :..-
devoted to keeping :~/-' .. -. . o'
resources
",
current with technology. -' l'ft .
. '.
. . , ~ - ..,' . , ~ .... TOTAL \VOR rH: 10 POINTs
/""" I . l ' . . .),
,.:' - /('rI/.
. ,
, 'r . .'/ )
.... ,.-
jcE, .',
'.. .....,1.. ~ 7'.;'.~.'
~ _ ~,.; t' /,'
,/.'
.: ~';l' '. ":: ..' I .
// '.-,:'::'.
.-'''' I: ..
.'
)' ."... " ;-. "
r;'. ,
'. '.:.. -. . - ", - " .
,
.
,,--.
(
'1
, ...
I
)
.
i .
V
TOTAL 10 POINTS
CITY OF CLEAR\\'ATER II1WtV',,.,7.
REQUEST FOR COM PETITIVE I'ROPOSALS F
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COi\1l\1ERCIAL RECYCLI~G PROGRAt\I
EVALUATION CRITERrA and RANKING PROCESS
4.5 RATE EVALUATION
CRITERIA
a) Rates for provision of
residential curbside/curbsort
collection service.
Cu
b) Rates for multi-family
collection service.
,
c) Additional rate per residence
for other than curbside (back
door, side door, etc.) collection
per container.
d) Rates for provision of
commercial collection service
(taking into account HB 461).
e) Other:
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
containers.
ii) R~placement of damaged or
missing containers.
iii) Wheeled bin toters
f) Provision of multi-material
drop-off center at solid waste
complex. 7 days/week
CO~tj\IE.NTS
\\'EI CHING
FACTOR
RATING
/tJw
,f. ~SS
Il_ 15
11~r)
/, X~
"1'1
/,7c-
45%
, .
."
1.5
:;J~tJ/~50
J{,!,I .,
)l /....,...,-r:. J ,/,
15. U..11 I .,,>' /.,..'-
Ii I/!J I'" (. "t., i! : ( (.
J ,..,!)
I>'~
,.... ". )
/6,51 i:' - ; .--; he
7
-
c
10%
,7
5%
It:>
I 1'1 "'U. ,'. 1
II Pv J~ r~ (L_o.
-; "'" , " L-l r. /;/l
'tl'~.~ /~.,
;-
, J
/5,J,L':Irr' /,;J.,.J .
....:0,.. ~. /.;.,-:-r;.,.
IS jb . - .~ / I .
Jb~'I'Ce pc.. /t/(f'C
Itj,Sb .-_
',-.'.7 ;r:':>./ r':'_.
30%
)
~7
5%
J
:5.N
,
....1 .,'. of'''
<:../~,;.... ,"
,f
/ ",,0)
') ,..........
I ,. '1.....
:;:~:;...~. -~
.
. . e.'
',.; '.
i
"
o.
".' .......,.
.."~ f'" ..'.
/) . rt) /:
F'! ~;..
." .....,..
'..,
j
5%
'" ,. 'l" .
,_. I
I
41
- ,
,
"
.".,1 ;:~ .-,' ;t . .
"'), .' ~
TOTAL \"ORTH: 10 l'OlNTS r "1
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided t ,..,. 0
support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken.
\
", I.,.
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
REQUEST fOR CO~1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RE.SI DE!\'TIAL CURBSIDE and CO:\t!\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA!\1
EVALUA TIO~ CRITEHIA and RA!\:KING PROCESS
4.4 AGREET\1ENT EVALUATION
I 0 PO 11\T"fS
-- / ",' /r>' /' I'-;-~' 7
I f I( I I .. .) I { { r: .~.
L} ,
rg;C:?/)T~'" ..
, I ;:. ; /"" '/v--
, l .'
"..l. 1 .., , - ......
~.)/.. ,.".-,.' .- '-
....
i1> ,..;,.! '.
t:('J (I' "
I
"',''=J''. ,
,., , .1 ,'" ,-
/, ~'
,,, ,. J ..
- ,...' -;
/,-,. J
'";. , i 1'-'1
/:''-_Y''''( /f f
...- r 0"
:./-71-/11./
/,:?- /.::. " . . :../' ,of" .,..
" #.' -... .-- .... " .
) . '/' ;7..'( (
'...J I.. .. .......... I' (
, "---"J
<;. /::;''l V~ :'
1
L
..
\4.6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
10 POINTS I
5t1e. /3,9.::)< or /~ I
4
.......,~_-,-.J/II r'::"\~/'r....J.l') -1' - './':' .... I" '
:,-F' -r-.' _ l I " /(... ~'.,., tv1 ,.~.,!.... .. ,.;.: .;-r I:
./_. "
. '::;:h,,':..c C ~ ~ l!eJ;- n'Lc,'l//'i';S /Jd.:,:Y:::: Ih""/3~,'C ... I'. ' : ,:,-., .:....
, .... ", -/,_ '-:',." J; _, .~"'lr''';' .. I ::
/y.~t. .,- "J~- Ll', ...~") " ~ ,'I" ~. {.."'." .' ..'.. - ,;1".,-. C-}:. . ,--
- ,,;.',/ -:.'" f: : ~ ./ }j,-Jc.. ',' /n.>. oJ ' r II ~ -
.::> ,!.,,,\/ o::>.!.. ;;
/I~ :C.'o' -:- . ~ ',.; f
,,-,.. .."...,-:" . ~ ."
~.: .~.",,,,,,\.'.. ".
,/"1.)./ ,', ., '\ , . .
'"-' r. '-.'... ,.,.::... ....
'. ". ..
;f't..'j'Y. //\/ /'!~',1..~";/,IL:.. /- T~-";: .
.... .. ...... ;'.:",-. ", I - ,t:::j"-), ,,. . .,-
.. oJ... I.. ...;-l , I) \.,.. J _.' .
.. -, ....f
4.7 C01\11\1UNITY SERVICE EVALUATION
10 POINTS
f?f.J I.~.:' i
. -,
, ! I' #," ...<.~..~ .. i
-.' ',', ....., .,
_ < 0'\" .'t,f. ~"".f
""I"" n ~(.' \
. . .,-
, " ......
.' ."
. ' ~ ,-
I . . /' T/ '''l', ".
.. -
.' ...- ....... .,. -':.
, , '
.... ..'1"
, .
) .' .
,I. "..1."
, ,
. ,'.
-
....
. .. .
/,\ '/",' ',.
',<,"'~
~ -
\ ., '" J
I "
,
, "
-1'.' I . ,f ...:,,' .'
./~.. .
-
J ."
./'-'/.. (.'. 1" J' I
I J.I . 'L-,"f' I
") _' .. -7 . .'
'. ,
..';'- t --.
. .; ~ ,.-
..,' .
.~'
. .
.' .,. .. i'""":."") I,,,'., .....
.'~ I ." ,....
/
, ..
,'.,./~/
,....,
/".
I
.1 '. .... ",'
.. '../,:'
......
.'-" .,..' .
. ... to
)" . ."
. .--:. J''',
./,.' ,
.. , ,....,'
" o.
" I- ' .": 'I. :'" '
L .
t ........_ :.i)..1 .. ,....
/ .:... .4.' ." < .
..
:"jI'''' ,:. '
,
.~
. .
<
. ',~ ; '.-
.. .. ..."t.
,-
9
~
l:
L/
....
.J
i
.
- . > I,.~ '. ;. . #
.f :,Io......~ ~ .It.' ,
'.;j >
< ,,:
. - "
,
... .
., ,
.' , ,.,:' :.'..' . i,
. I' ." ~ .
(". .
:'.J .
':', 'j
. "':: j~. ;','" . ~.
: ~, p
,.:.... ;...,
, "
" .
I:'
,':. :.{'
:._'" ~ '"......~.!,' ,... "'. it ;i.. ..
,
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR COj,\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COJ\11\1ERCIAL REC\'CLJ~G PROGRAl\f
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PUOCESS
, 4.8 RANKING PROCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE)
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
d.)
Commercial Services
e,) , Community Service Evaluation (CSE)
TOTAL SCORE:
~
4(TFE) + 4(AE) + 6(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + 1 (CSE)
. t ,'. :
"'.. '
,. . I.,.
. -" "
, ,
, .
'. .
.;' ,-' .~~: /.., .,\' ,:...-... <~
KI~t~tINS RECYCLI~G CORPORATIO~ J rVl
CITY OF- CLEAR\VA TER
REQUEST FOR CO;\1 PETITI VE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL ClJRBSIDE and COI\li\IERCIAL RECYCLI~G PROGRA1\1
EV ALVA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.3 TECIIl\1CAL and FINANCIAL EV ALUA TION TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERIA COi\1f\1ENTS 'VORTIl RA TING
Adequacy of the proposed overall 2 lr.
operational plan.
.
Feasibility, operational reliability, 1 \
and sufficiency of the collection
system proposal.
Contingency capabili~ies of the ~' .1 r
'. proposed collection sy~tem." =_
. . ,- -.. " . " .- " .'. .' . 4
Demonstration of ability to 1 I
comply and maintain compliance
,
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability 1 \
of experience to proposed
conditions.
Qualifications of key personnel. 1 \
Reports from references. 1
-, "
Financial strength based upon 1 \
financial reports and other
supporting data submitted.
Demonstrated environmental 1 \
awareness, including the latest I
technology, cleanliness and
resources devoted to keeping
current wi th technology.
; fOTAL \VOR rH: 10 PUINTS
r)
CITY OF CLEAR\\'ATER
REQUEST FOR CO:\1 PETITI VE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COl\1!\tERCIAL RECYCLIi\G PROGRA1\1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
'"'.
4.5 RATE EVALUATION TOTAL 10 POIl\'1'S
CRITERIA COt\I1\IENTS \\'EICIIING RA TIl':G
FACTOR
a) Rates for provision of 45%
residential curbside/curbsort - L\ I
collection service. "
. \0 .~
b) Rates for multi-family 10%
collection service. ~
/
::> .
c) Additional rate per residence 5%
for other than curbside (back ~S
door, side door, etc.) collection q
per container. .
d) Rates for provision of 30%
commercial collection service
(taking into account HB 461). 1 \0
'),.
e) Other: 5%
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
containers. ~ .,
ii) Replacement of damaged or ~
, \
missing containers.
Hi) Wheeled bin toters ..
f) Provision of multi-material 5%
drop-off center at solid waste ~ I
complex 7 days/week ( ~\ )')
.
TOTAL \\'ORTH: 10 POINT
S
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided,
support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken.
'l 't ';
v';;
" .. "..,
: ."' . ,
';' " .
,\ " .
" . /.. "'~ \
'I . ~., '
, ,
,,' ,~ ",
,,'.",. ",
O'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR COl\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDEl\'TIAL CURBSIDE and CO~1!\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA!\1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
i 4.4 AGREEI\1ENT EVALUATION
10 POI~'TS I
\3r\~
10
. .
'14~6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
10 POINTS I
\0
4.7 C01\1MUNITY SERVICE EVALUATION
10 POINTS
\0
'I
\
I
i
,
i
I
I
\
,
, "
",.' .'.
:.,'.j ..
, ." , '". '.
. > .' ,
" , ;:~,~ .'~.<-:" ~L. \:'
"1,:'...
':1, .>:.., ,.... ~ -' i,
. ..'. ~ ~:' jl~';~:';;~~ 1"
"
~' '. I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
'REQUEST FOR CO~tPETITI\'E PROPOSALS
. :RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO,'\I!\IERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA^1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS.
4~8 RANKING PROCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE)
.
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
d.) Commercial Services
e.) Community Service Evaluation (CSE)
TOTAL SCORE:
....
4(.(fE) + 4(AE) + 6(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + 1 (CSE)
t-~ 0 ;- t.(l(:~)+ ?,p {- Iv
4t1.~
-
.....
. .' w...... .___ ..
, ,
- . . '.
. . "'. ~ .. ~
- .......~...I_..............
,.,.
KIl\1J\fISS RECYCLII"G CORPORATION
CITY OF- CLEAR \V A TER
REQUEST FOR C01\1 PETITI VE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO!\tl\tERCIAL RECYCLI~G PROCRAJ\1
JC 5 /l.
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.3 TECHNICAL and FINANCIAL EV ALUA TION TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERIA C01\IJ\.lENTS \\'ORTII RA TING
Adequacy of the proposed overall l%~ 2
operational plan. -Z.
Feasibility, operational reliability, l'cf S 1 l
and sufficiency of the collection
system proposal.
Contingency capabili\ies of the ~~~~ pJu-~ 1
proposed collection system. LvJ 4t\ -- ,
~,pevtL Lf..e~<L
. Demonstration of ability to V{~ 1
comply and maintain compliance \
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability ~S 1
of experience to proposed
conditions. \
Qualifications of key personnel. L~./) ~cP 1 \
.
Reports from references. DL 1
\
Financial strength based upon f)CG ~ . ~ ,
1
financial reports and other \
supporting data submitted.
^ I
Demonstrated environmental NcLt,..k1.L-v-LU.. I 1
awareness, including the latest S (n.. f-t..J \
technology, cleanliness and
<-
resources devoted to keeping
current wi th technology.
, TOrf AL \VOR Ill: 10 POINTS
(0
.
:.
.,
.-
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR CO:\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDESTIAL CURBSIDE and COl\tr\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA!\l
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.5 RATE EVALUATION TOTAL 10 POI1'\TS
CRITERIA COl\tl\lENTS '\'EIGIII~G RATING
./ FACTOR
a) Rates for provision of fytS'\ 45% 16
residential curbside/curbsort L/
~y~\, lo0 , ( /
c.,-
collection service. ~ It'"
\ ~ \ ',-,
fS v~ ()J
b) Rates for multi-family ~\o-tJ 10%
collection service. '-/-'
,"\,'~ .
W-'
c) Additional rate per residence . R~U:-~ 5% i
for other than curbside (back
door) side door, etc.) collection
\ ~
per container.
"
d) Rates for provision of SO/vJ----' _. 30% 20
commercial collection service
(taking into account HB 461).
V'^,- \~..
().,<)
e) Other: 9- 0>>- \LLrfl 5%
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent \ I
containers.
ii) Replacement of damaged or I
missing containers.
iii) Wheeled bin toters
..'
A " \,
f) Prov.ision of multi-material /: \:.(2) 5%
' It. , ,
drop-off center at solid waste f-_C.t/V'-...\L_'.... . \
complex 7 days/week '/ -
,
TOTAL \VORTH: 10 POINT
S
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided.
support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken.
C(IV
. , .
,,'r ", ,.l.
.: .,:
, , ,
'/0" .
, '
~ : '.. ~. ,
""1 '.'
"
, .~,
, .-
".:~...;,.,....I.- ...',J~,~~~.;.J::/~ L";""~",<" ."
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
. REQUEST FOR CO!\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO,'\t!\tERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAJ'\f
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.4 AGREE"'1E~'T EVALUATION
10 POINTS
\)Jl~ n'0
cflvCV~
.10'
I 4.6 C01\1MERCIAL SERVICES
a sf&. J J-u,LLJu-I 16
C.~~ \PCCh-d . ,~
G\/ I j" c:~ f' CL L \ ~ S,;t-';2-Q.'>~.'"
, l...,..J....... J . .....'
. y\~u ~ ~ C:L.L'~ c::Lv{-
O~\l0 0Jp c~p..a-.(
IJ
10 POINTS I
"
-'
~ (2J._t~J~.\:.'S -
I..,)
q
4.7 C01\11\1UNITY SERVICE EVALUATION
10 POINTS
F \oLvv ~ cY-\....c...e.c.J-t-<.,"Y-' cJ S d.~ 1- () (..u\? l.~
hUL- )'Vv~\"'\JcL~ - ~V~\.. L-~ \ {~~~
b. k..-(YV---" ~ C;2I,A.);'eVvJ'{ ~ , 0
U2.- (L~c vt. \-0 CJ~ - I
~CQ..,t.-vr~w,.J {~.c~'V+ (0u.-11
"<'~ '
, .. .
.}.: :'." -..!:::._. L -:-.~.' ..
. ..
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR COJ\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COM~1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROCRA~I
EV ALVA TION CRITErHA and RANKING PROCE~S
" 4.8 RANKING PROCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE)
. .
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
d.) Commercial Services
e.) Community Service Evaluation (CSE)
TOTAL SCORE:
J'
4(fFE) + 4(AE) + 6(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + l(CSE)
40 t ~10 t65,1. -r- \ ~ -r 9
----
.,..,.
I \0 Z, 2;0
0'
" 1}1.
.
.
KI1\11\1lI'\S RECYCLING CORPORA TIO~ 71 r! J
,."
CITY O~CLEAR\VATER
REQUEST FOR COf\IPETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDEl"TlAL CURBSIDE and COMl\lERCIAL RECYCLI~G PROGRAT\l
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
'"
4.3 TECHNICAL and FINANCIAL EVALUATION TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERIA COt\.1J\l ENTS \\'ORTII RA TING
Adequacy of the proposed overall 2
operational plan. C
.
Feasibility, operational reliabili ty t 1
and sufficiency of the collection {
system proposal.
.
Contingency capabilities of the 1
proposed collection system. (
Demonstration of ability to 1
comply and maintain compliance (
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability 1
of experience to proposed t
conditions.
Qualifications of key personnel. 1 (
Reports from references. 1 (
.....
Financial strength based upon 1 {
financial reports and other .-
supporting data submitted.
Demonstrated en vi ran men tal 1
awareness, including the latest 1
technology, cleanliness and
resources devoted to keeping
current with technology,
, fOTAL \\'ORIH: 10 POINTS .........
(
{ :"~ 'j
, '\ .
./
..--,
. ,
, ~' '~
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
REQUEST FOR COl\IPETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO~tMERCIAL RECYCLING PROCRA~t
EV ALVA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
..
4.5 RATE EVALUATION TOTAL 10 POII\7S
CRITERIA COl\Il\1ENTS \\'EIGIlING RATING
FACTOR
a) Rates for provision of 45%
residential curbside/curbsort ~ -('
collection service.
. I '.
I ~:--'
b) Rates for multi-family 10%
collection service. I
.
~
c) Additional rate per residence 5% )
for other than curbside (back .-/
door, side door, etc.) collection -L-
per container.
d) Rates for provision of 30%
commercial collection service 6
(taking into account HB 461).
e) Other: 5% J-
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
containers. 7-
ii) Replacement of damaged or
missing containers. "
iii) Wheeled bin toters .. . ...
f) Provision of multi-material 5% .D
drop-off center at solid waste
complex 7 days/week \0
TOTAL WORTH: 10 POINT
S
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided,
support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken. (
. Y
0:y
,
i
\
\
I
\
I
\
I
\
,
, ....;
~'
. . ~ r
I! ; , ,
"":i .
- ""
;.. '
. " " " "
','\ ,: '. '/' ,"
, ._.' *,"..'!. ,"..r ..
CITY OF CLEAR\\'ATER
REQUEST FOR CO~1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO~t!\IERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA1\1
EV ALVA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
14.4 AGREE~1ENT EVALUATION
10 POINTS I
. .
14.6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
10 POINTS I
14.7 COM~1UN1TY SERVICE EVALUATION
10 POINTS I
t,
; , ., : .. . .' ,~ .
. -J .... _' "'.-'l., _:~; '.'. ...: . ~" '~'~'- ., t. ,,', ,
.
-
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FeR COl\lPETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COf\I1\tERCIAL REC\'CLIl\'G PROGRA1\1
EV ALVA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.8 RANKING PROCESS
,
a. ) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE)
.
c,) Rate Evaluation (RE)
d.) Commercial Services
e.) Community Service Evaluation (CSE) ,
TOTAL SCORE::
4(fFE) + 4(AE)' + 6(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + l(CSE)
CYJtJ6) +(<lJ!S) f(Co) l&q f{l-)L~) -r Ct)(/D! J !(f
L), 0
!
, ~ ::>
/'1., ~
i'. 7
. ;//
. ~
" oJ /"'
'\I.l
-:.
:;
KIJ\1J\1I~S RECYCLI~G CORPORA TIO~ A / ~
CITY OF- CLEAR\VATER 'lV' IJ
REQUEST FOR COi\IPETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and CO:\tI\IERCIAL RECYCLI:\G PROGRAJ\1
EV ALVA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PHOCESS
4.3 TECIl1'.TJCAL and FINANCIAL EV ALUA TION ?) TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERIA COl\lJ\1ENTS \VORTH RA TING
Adequacy of the proposed overall ")
-
operational plan.
;::2-..
Feasibili ty, operational reliability, 1
and sufficiency of the collection /
system proposal.
.
Contingency capabilities of the 1
proposed collection system. /
Demonstration of ability to 1
comply and maintain compliance /
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability 1
of experience to proposed I
conditions.
Qualifications of key personnel. 1 /
Reports from references. 1
f!;J
.. ..
Financial strength based upon 1 0
financial reports and other
supporting data submitted.
Demonstrated environmental 1
awareness, including the latest (
technology, cleanl iness and
resources devoted to keeping
curren t with technology.
, rO'lAL \VORIH: 1U POINT'
,< '
{ J ,,:'
:.' .. '
,'..I
~ ' '"
.
.
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
REQUEST FOR C01\1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COl\tMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRA!\1
EV ALVA TION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.5 RATE EVALUATION 7 TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERI A COl\t~1ENTS \VEIGHING itA TING
FACTOR
a) Rates for provision of 45% 45%
residential curbside/curbsol1
collection service. -
.
b) Rates for multi-family 10% g,cr%
collection service.
.
c) Additional rate per residence 5% ~3%
for other than curbside (back ' p
door, side door, etc.) collection
per container.
d) Rates for provision of 30% \G%
commercial collection ser.vice
(ta.l(ing into account HB 461).
e) Other: 5% , ~,3%
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
containers.
ii) Replacement of damaged or
missing containers.
iii) \\'heeled bin toters .. .'
f) Provision of multi-material 5% \ /0
drop-off center at solid waste
complex 7 days/week
TOTAL WORTH: 10 POINT
S
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided,
support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken.
(.
\
\
\
I
.~ > <
;' Ii,
. ',:. I' . ~ ' .\
'"
, t;:. k f. I - . ~, ..
"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR CO:\lPETITIVE PROr>OSALS
RESIDEr\TIAL CURBSIDE and CO~1:\1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROCRA!\1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.4 AGREET\1ENT EVALUATION
~~ ?~-J~
~ 10 POI~'TS
. .
, /4.6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
)(tr-IIM~~ MM~~ ' " , I
lIpt~. ~Pd.f(AR - r:u4rj ~~
ad ~~(: ~ "'
cr
10 POINTS I
4.7 COM1\1UNITY SERVICE EVALUATION
, rt.t"A ~ 5
-:;~ ~ b C;;7 hJk;ft;;~
i2#~U-'1'! ~ C/~~ {/
#dt:nf !ftrtu //('11 CJkT-
6
10- POINTS
,
,"., ",,'
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR C~~1PETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDE~TIAL CURBSIDE and COl\1~1ERCIAL RECYCLING PROCRAi\1
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCES~
4.8 . RANKING rnOCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE)
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
. .
d.) Commercial Services
e.) Community Service Evaluation (CSE)
, TOTAL SCORE: \ 0 ~
4(TFE) + 4(AJ::) + 6(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + I(CSE}
~. 5 1 ~ ,~
.3 ~ -\ ~t> + 4':)... ~ ~ + ~
\D~
":;'
"" " '
~;: ,
, ',"
, '\
'I
. I
I
I
"\
"\
,
, I
I
I
, I
I
t
I
I
I
',. ~',
}
.~
.>... r;!
-; '.,
....
RECEIVED
OCT22 1993
City ~At4nogtH'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet
. TO:
Mayor Rita Garvey
7f)?1. ~?J
FROM:
Robert M. Brumback, Assistant Director of PW/Utilities
COPIES:
Commissioners Sue Barfield, Arthur Deegan, Richard Fitzgerald, Fred
Thomas; City Manager Michael Wright; Deputy ,City Manager Kathy
Rice; Assistant City Manager Elizabeth Deptula; Public Works Director
William C. Baker
, "
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY RECYCLING REPORT, JULY 1 - SEPTEMBER 30, 1993
DATE: October 21, 1993
Attached is the recycling report for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 1992/93.
Please contact me at 462-6795 if you have any questions regarding this report.. . .
:..
" .. ...., ,'; ..... ,,;;~.; : 1:.'1,;"'1" -,,; ;.
.', ~". ,:; . \.(:' 1 '
;" .I
. ,~.
,
..
. "
., '
)'.
. .; ~ ,.:, ~;
. . ~ .
,
., ,
t '
, - .
:,1
'" ", >\ .;.i""y"
<.
SOLID WASTE DIVISION
QUARTERLY RECYCLING REPORT
JULY 1 - SEPTEMBER 30, 1993
TOTAL RECYCLED (see Attachment A)
This quarter:
Last quarter:
2,918.04 tons
2,901.87 tons
*Gross revenue: $32,912.45
*Gross revenue: $38,927.65
FY 92/93 through 4th quarter:
FY 91/92 through 4th quarter:
11.114.58 tons
12,994.05 tons
*Gross revenue$129,833.45
*Gross revenue: $48,139.27
(*Excludes revenue from aluminum cans distributed to non-profit agencies. This quarter,
donated revenue totaled $3,237.70.)
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT & NEWS
RESIDENTIAL SERVICES
Curbside Collection
Newspaper Routes
This program continues with the participation rate being maintained at around 35-40%
with no additional public education.
Present In-House Program
The 1,600 home pilot curbside program, introduced In April 1990, remains unchanged.
Full-Service Pilot Curbside Recycling Program'
Set out rates in the four test neighborhoods remain high, with approximately 50'% of
residents setting out recyclables each week in the Skycrest subdivision, and around 75%
setting out in the other three areas.
Dropoff Centers - Contamination Levels Low
Contamination levels remain low at the dropoff centers. No loads of recyclable materials
collected from dropoffs were rejected this quarter. Contamination by the T. G. Lee yellow plastic
milk jugs (see Markets) is sufficiently low at the dropoff centers not to pose a problem at this
time However, illegal dumping of non-recyclable material at dropoff sites, particularly at the
Cultural Arts Center and Countryside High School, is increasing. We are addressing this
problem on a case-by-case basis.
Page 1 of 5
.. ~ .
. '. '. ." ':' - r ~." L . ..' .-
. ,
" ;'
.'1' ,I
',:'- ,.
.';,
'. """
." ::'
"
~.. .
. .', '
! . '
':' '\'
, ',.:~, .:.. :~ ~l >;~;~ ,I' ;
. ,
~.
Multi-family Recycling Program
Thirty-two accounts are now participating in this program. Four new accounts joined this quarter
(Ultimar condominium, Hillcrest mobile home park, Beach Club apartments and Town Place
apartments), adding an additional 750 units (households) to the program.
Yard Waste Recycling Program
1,601.30 tons of yard waste were recycled into free mulch this quarter.
The results of the Pinellas County Grass Clipping Recycling Program (the only detailed research
of its kind conducted thus far in the United States) were released this quarter. It was found,
during the 2Y2 year project, that each single-family household produces just under % of a ton of
grass clippings per year, which represents a significant amount of yard waste that can be
recycled on site. It was further determined through the 1993 Pinellas County Telephone
Recycling Awareness Survey that 61 % of single-family homeowners In the county leave their
clippings on the lawn. This may, in part, account for the fact that the yard waste collected by
the Solid Waste Division in July and August this year was 108.19 tons less than that collected
during the same months in 1992.
Scrap MetaUWhite Goods Recycling
115.12 gross tons (excluding steel cans) were recycled this quarter.
COMMERCIAL SERVICES
Commercial Cardboard Collection .
Eighteen new accounts joined the program this quarter, bringing the total serviced to 131
customers. 249.59 tons of cardboard were collected.
Commercial Office Paper Collection
Eighty-two accounts are serviced at present. 8.18 tons of office and computer paper wE)re
recycled.
Hotel/Motel Recycling Program
Nine hotels and motels currently participate in this program.
MARKETS
Market prices are holding steady for all materials, with aluminum dropping slightly. However,
the price for plastic milk jugs and soda bottles rose from $50/ton to $55/ton this quarter. Our
market for plastics, Recycle America, has stated that the material corning from Clearwater is the
Page 2 of 5
'i
.)
.!
" . .' .,... '
\ 'f:,.; ';>' '~
,', . ','
. , <'."
. .
;' ';\
, ' ~ , {' -~ '
. "
" ,
. 0 ' ~.
t' <
, '..;
.. _,', .I.....:. ,>,., _:. ._ '~'" !'.' (.
, ~
. ~:
.,
'.
"cleanest" (least contaminated) currently received at the plant.
, T.G. Lee's new yellow milk jugs are regarded by our market (and all other local buyers) as mixed
color HOPE, and are therefore technically not acceptable in our program. However, as they
represent such a small percentage of the bottles being collected, Recycle America will accept
them without any pricing downgrades at this time. In the unlikely event that we begin receiving
too high a percentage of the bottles at the dropoff centers, a public education campaign will be
developed to correct the problem. Our policy at present is to leave any yellow bottles appearing
in bins on our pilot curbside program with a note explaining that they are not acceptable.
Due to aggressive research and negotiation of markets in FY 92/93, we have seen an increase
in revenue received (without a concurrent increase in volume of materials) of 590~ over the
previous fiscal year.
PUBLIC INFORMATION & EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Public InfonnatJonJEducation Figures
Presentations and speeches
Displays
Attendees
401
2,900
9
3
TOTAL # OF RESIDENTS REACHED THIS QUARTER
3,301
.:
TOTAL REACHED FISCAL YEAR TO DATE
75,430
Information packets sent out
Phone enquiries about recycling
65
2,157
Educational & Promotional Materials
A new brochure on the theme of SMART shopping (Saving Money and Reducing Trash), was
prepared by our recycling staff and printed in August by the Graphic Communications division.
It highlights waste reduction, and is distributed with our many other educational materials to
Clearwater residents at presentations, displays and on request by mail or telephone.
Colorful, eye~catching posters in English and Spanish were produced in-house this quarter to
educate our commercial customers on the correct way to recycle corrugated cardboard. Similar
posters and bulletin board flyers were also designed for our multi-family customers, addressing
the materials in their programs. The posters are being distributed to existing and new accounts.
In September, the recycling office donated around 1.600 sheets of recycled wrapping paper to
81. Jerome's Catholic Church. They were used to wrap children's gifts as part of the "Toys for
Tots" campaign.
;
Page 3 of 5
,'\, "
..,....'1;
'!"
"
. . ,
,:1 ..
.. ,
,,'
',.
"I, ,
,. . '. < n. .'~
.1"
Coastal Clean Up
On September 18. the Solid Waste Division participated once again in the Coastal Clean Up,
now an international event. Trucks collected bags of trash and larger items (around 1 ~ tons in
all) which had been picked up by 250 volunteers and left curbside on Sand Key, Clearwater
Beach and the Memorial Causeway.
The materials were brought back to the Clearwater Marine Science Center and sorted.
Approximately 520 Ibs.of aluminum, glass, plastic and steel cans were separated from the trash
for recycling. As usual, our recycling display and staff were on hand to answer questions and
provide information on our programs.
Recycling Education at the Martin Luther King Center
The recycling office participated in the Martin Luther King Center's summer program in July. A
series of presentations on recycling were given to 200 children at the center, which included
speeches, demonstrations of recycling and solid waste vehicles, and appearances by our
mascots "Billy Barrel" and "Daisy Dumpster."
Recycling Education at the Clearwater Marine Science Center
In September, a recycling display was set up at the center, which includes brochures, flyers and
examples of recyclable and recycled materials. We plan to rotate this display every few months
between this center, the Martin Luther King Center, libraries, and other facilities visited by a
large number of Clearwater residents.
Other Community Events
Recycling staff participated in a number of other events this quarter. including the City's
community contact meeting at the Clearwater East Library, the Fourth of July Family Fun Fair
& Co~munity Awareness Expo at Coachman Park, and presentations at the Mornlngslde World
Awareness Camp, Suncoast Christian School and Calvin Hunsinger School.
City Innovations
Two items submitted by the recycling office appeared in the Florida League of Cities' 1993 City
Innovations Showcase this quarter (see Attachment B). These highlighted Clearwater's ,"Buying
Recycled" efforts. and the successful pilot curbside recycling program which ran from May .
through October 1992.
We have also submitted an entry to the League's publication Youth ... The Key to Quality Cities,
due out next summer. It describes the "tree-saving" campaign jointly organized in May by
recycling staff and Curtis Fundamental School, which was covered in the last quarterly report.
Page 4 of 5
~j~
,f . "
l.'" '
..
" t, '
;~'
"' .
~ ~ '!. '
....
j
Holiday Task Force
Planning on various projects is under way by the Pinellas County Recycling Committee's Holiday
Task Force. The annual recycling tabloid is being prepared, and will appear in the St.
Petersburg Times on November 18.
The recycled holiday gift wrap produced each year by the task force for free distribution to the
public is being redesigned. This year it will feature "Boris Earth-a-Saurus," the County's new
environmental mascot.
In previous years, one method of promoting Christmas tree recycling was with the use of
Christmas tree hangers distributed to vendors. This year, the task force has developed a
recycled plastic car litter bag to be attached to the trees, which can be used year round.
As usual, the holiday hotline will be set up to provide information on Christmas tree recycling
and other holiday recycling tips.
ADF .. Florida's Advance Disposal Fee
There has been little advance publicity and much confusion about the new advance disposal (not
deposit) fee introduced by the Legislature effective October 1, 1993. A fact sheet and Florida
Specifier article are attached (Attachments C & D) which may help clarify the issue.
The fee is levied on any glass, plastic and plastic-coated paper container which is a can, bottle,
jar or beverage container with a capacity of 5 fluid ounces to one gallon. In order to be exempt
from the fee, a container must be used for medicine, medical devices, drugs or other medical
items or meet one of several market-based incentives. For instance, steel and aluminum cans
are being recycled at a rate exceeding 500/0, and are therefore exempt. In addition to recycling
rate, recycled content is one of the criteria for exemption. .If plastic bottles contain at least 250/0
recycled content, manufacturers - as in the case of Coca Cola and Pepsi Cola - may apply for
exemption from the ADF. If glass containers meet or exceed 350/0 recycled content rates (paper
containers, 30%) by July 1994, they will become exempt.
Of the $23 million expected to be collected in the first year of the program, approximately 30%
will be used for supplemental grants to counties' (and, in turn, cities) for recycling and
environmental education and for improving markets for recycled materials.
Page 5 of 5
'. ' ."'''. -~~. --- -- - ~." --' -~--' -- ---~'---~---:: --:~. -' -~-' -- ----~ -~" -- .'" .--:-------~ _~. - _____~ ~~_ :.h~.: __"~~~.~__. ". ' . "' "', ,". . " '.
. .
.
.'
. '.
L .1, .......... ...,; ....J l\l.. ......., J \....IvI\ltt wJU/\I\Il." !l4.JJ \JULI . ~L:.IJI.)
, hr:~r~Jl6B~WIi.~~!!.~~~6~;~~.~!!~".;i;L7t~r,~-"'~'~'J~,1"fci~.~"i:,~ir.....~l'iN~~.~~'-' ....
~ [l...,..... . . ',", . '. OISPOSALPERTON..
l!. . " ., .~:::...t__.~___ ---.-.--------.--.-.--.-
I. MATERIAL
l.. [j ~~U.MINUM.~N~r;n~
L~ MARKED .1.78_
H..',:,. '..\ ~.~~~~
U..:-_.__~mnOB()~~Dnr.11'm'3_..___..__.. "'___'_ .----...--
I~' MARKET 1
~l MNIKET 11
III
~]!"" ' ..~~~.!ra-llimY;l
\. "j.. ., '" IMRKET 5 CLEAR
II .'. '" ." :...'..;,~ I'. ",,'. ~ anOW11
~! GREEN
III
!ii _lll;l;'cE:p.AAltif~___---------_. ______.___..:.._____._ __..
~"I ,.i " ..' ,,,,. '{, .... , MARKET 1
:.1 .' ,.::' COMPUTER PRINT
\!.!~.:~:_.. ,,;' "" WI/ITE LEDGER
': MIXED PflPER
" COLOR LEDGER
.
.3560__.._.$G6.15- $120.00_ $1.28160.__.
3391 $63.56 $680.00 $1,152.94
9205 $172.59 $0.00 $0.00
249.59
o
499180
$000
$6.239.76
$000
$9.359.63
$10.00
$25.00
71.58 143160 $2.GO~.25 $5000' $3.579.00
16.41 _ __.36940 -__ - $692.63-- $2S.oo-_~.$461.75 ...
21.39 54160 $1.027.13 $15.00 $410.65
006
...__.... 4.45 ... .___
2.61
o
1120 $32.25
6900. . ..... $166.60
5740 $101.63
o $0.00
$80.00
$20.00
$0.00
$0,00
$68.80
$69.00
$0.00
$0.00
~
'1.:.;,;'''' :', HEWpp.At!~lnn..'i:;:nq, . , '. .
I .. ' .:' :. ., .:". ~., :,' .';' MAAKET 3, '. 0 $0.00 $20.00 . $0.00 .
'~ ~.:.:~_~":"'~MARKno._.____550.9 _____.1101600.____$20.656.75.._. $20.00__.__ $11.018.00....._
I ONP 0 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00
l' MARKET 11
~:' _ .__.ONl?
~h. ..;...;. DUNEDIN PAPER REVEl' . .
l!1')""'}I;t''''''-:>''}~'''' ~ \~~:.' :", .... " .
)L_~J!~~1JJtX~m~'-:'_._..._________o__._______.__ __oom." ..
~l MARKET 1 I 0 $0.00 $500 $0.00'
lJl' MARKET 13 23.45 46900 $619,38 $50.00 $1.172.50
'14
11- '.. . t1CI'III'l''lIEi'',,/irr:o:t!'Zr.1 '''t .'.
,'< ,t't ,: f') .t..R...: l~..rrJ . ,II.. ~,.,u.n".1!.J..,ia < .... ,,' .,' J .. ~I'" .
... ).':. .;. :';::~1~.1.~ ~:: ,::.: MARKET 7 i. 1'..
~, ;..:'_~..":'::::':':'..:.:':: WHITE GOODS.... .:.:.:._ 79.905. . 116907.2 ..
OUMPSTERS 14.09 31561.6
SCRAP 21.012 47066.88
STEELCAIIS U.8 25984
.., : '.I r;"'. L <~'.~:-l.','- .'.. t.. ,.':..; I,:
.' <-::~:: ,::J~~~n.trnJ~~~Q . 1 ' . .
.~ :,:":"--":::":":..;;.;,SCMP.AlUMINUM ..__::.._______~_..____...:_.._.__ _.._ ______......___.... '.'0' _...._
... MARKET 12 0.01 20 $0.38 $500 00 $5.00
I.: 0.058 110 $2.16 $GOO.OO $34.00
t 0.016 3Z $O.60_$2OQ.O:Q $3.20 __._.._.....
".' I ;'l" 'IIlS.COPPER WIRE 0.021 42 $0.79 $300.00 $G.30
I,... ....!:.,,'::.;;.:,.. .,.c.;~;.;BRASS,~.,'. .0.005 :.' . 10 $0.19 $700.00 '.,' $3.50
)\ _..:......:._~.:...:.:~2-_ ...:.:..:.:__:_....:....___0.0035.._ .--.:...:..___ _ ..L_ ........ $0.13__ $800,00._. . ,_.__ $2.60......
.....
194.19
OG.8
:l09580___ $1,:104.63_$16.00 _.____ $2,921.65_ .... .
173200: $11,.~: $952.0C! .
. .
. ;~.\. t . ! .
. ,
..,
~, , .
"
$3.35(;.01 . $30.00
$591.70 $30.00
$862.50 $30.00
$~07,20_$5.00
$2.397.15 ::..
$422.10
$630.36
$58.00__. __ ..._.. _ ._ . ....__..
'.
" tf~!t15W,A.~t.~::';r:;u;,"
I.
~s,,: .,' TO' -DE 0 ::~ '...<
~\ "':""";";'1;. MARKET <4 CiiY' ... 21.18 <42360
'j .. _CLt:r:~.P!!m..~C.T.EDI_'__'._'P...._.______.Q..__.
t:hHtlrMAil:RI;J.~~Jfl
LOGS
1GOl.3
3202600
$36,029.25
$201.2i
.._$Q,OO_____.~ ..
11.33
226GO
$424.68
It
<
It
f-i
Z
~
::it
0::
U
<
I::
<
--.
"",
Db CRUSII 5.08 10\60 $190.50
PAllETS' 0 $0.00
"~"." ..t'rMARKET9DATTERIES. 0---$0.00-$0,03 < $O.OO"_'_"~h"_"" .,.-...-- ..- .....
I j-' . ' ~.MARKET 10 BARRELS " . 0 $0.00. .... . .
. ~('; '.. !~".:;..' , .', .' '. ,
r.'I- -'--' :r.;u:uw :r~!S:: t:=t:= 1:1:==a=:l cs=zeer,=,:.:t:rtUI == ~~=::lIS =:::= %::: 1::::::.,,:: 'r e !!:r:::t ~:~e: fU: e:Sfl: C'==~ c===2:reJl:u:zJ:I -_. .
( 'ul TOTAL IN 1I0USE 2916.0385 5608402.06 $65,383.64 $32,012.<45
l! I ----..-.-......-..:::::==.........-.-.-...................-.......:..::::::::::=:::::.:::::::::=:::.:::::::':::::.::::':':_. ""_ .
." Hi" ....,(I..:.1UMMARY: tOHNMiEIREVENUE . TONS REVENUE" "
l!~" ... "MATERIAL. . . ..
, AlUMII-IUM---.-------.----._-----1I.018 -.--- $2:~3U~ --.-----... - ..----.
i, CARDBOARD (oec) 249.59 $6.239.75
ii! GLASS 111.44 $4.~51.60
II! .,OFFICEP1-.PEn....,. '0:18"'-$1S7.80..' >. ~:-~-;-.._.. .- . ....-.... ..-...
il,'. .' ; :". NEWSPAPER (ONP) ;.' .';':'. '.' 745.69 $13.939.05 ~. '.
lit:..:.>, "PLASTIC'I.'I~;I' .... . ,,,' " 23045 $1,172.50 . "
ti.----SCRAPJ,lI:f;\l-..:...--.-.....-.. ---.......---..- ------.. 'i15.00r' ...- S~.~M.21"-' .-.......-.-
(, Ii STEEL CANS 11.6 $5R.00
1ft OTHER NON.FERROUS 0.1135 55.G
"[01......: .:Y^RDW^ST~~-~-:-:---'---:--IGOI:3 -.- $0.00
<. in \..',' :;. CONSTRL!CTIOI-l& DEMO; '.:' . 21.18 $0.00
;. ;' '. . . ;. j' OTHER MATERIAL:' 16.41 $0.00
tjj ;:---'-DUNEDIN PAPER"-'-' ..-.---------- -..--.-...... - .-.--.. .... $952.60.------.... .
] TOTAL 2918.0385 $32,912.45
.'\
".
': ',>:'
.~---'- ..._----<...... <..
~.,.1:I~i~~~..j.~:NcirE!f':~>I:.~\:~;!;\'~:~:;.:;:>:..,; ':,~i/\,..:i' ".j:,.!:, . ',:.: . ::.: ~......~.:.:.I.. :.<.;~'i>:~:...~'
. iii" J..'~I.':li.; 1) hON ~ 2,000 It:lS; i TON SCRAP METAL. 2.240 lEis . . '. '.~. .:!y. . . {. '
Eil" .:..J..:~2) ^VC>lDED DISPOSAL' S~VINOS ;. $31.50 (YARD WASTE $22.50 PER TON) (C&O ArlO OTHER $9.50)- ..' --..
! rj; 3) MARKETS (1) BFI (2) REYNOLDS (3) PAPER STOCK (4) KIMMINS
in (5) OWENS.BRDCKWAY (6) SUN COAST INSULATION (7) CLEARWATER SCRAP
5.--:--:- ,.... .. (6) PINEttAS RECYClINO (0) SAFE START BATTERY (10) BROOKS PRODUCTS-;-----~.._..-.
roo ~.;.\ ,.' ;;'. _\ \' (Kll)SRMURLFIT (12) JAMES METALS (13) RECYCL~ AMERICA . '., . " . . .
iiI ,., . '.., 4) DLAe SA RE S SHIPPED TO BROOKS PRODUCTS rOR CREDIT @ $GO PEn TON .,'. ' '.
" ---5) $3.231:70 OISTRIOUTED BETWEW NON PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FROM SALE OF ^lUMINUM CANS.. .
....
(,
Mayor Rita Garvey .\- '_.C\\,\.
City Of Clearwater Florida
112 South Osceola Drive
Clearwater Florida 34615
. .
t.. ',-'
:....i... I
.. '"
.: t. !
f.
.... .
...; ','
,'J >.:
, '
, '"',,; ,
. .,
,; ';", ' .~-
. ~.." - ~ ::,
,
,.;',~"':-' :'
rJ
. .
.........,. ,
mR'RRTHOrl
. 'V:.:
. . .
, .
Marathon Equipment Company
Fireman's Industnal Parkl PO BOt 290/ Clearflelej PennsylvarllCJ 16830/ (814) 765D200
A ~ DOVER) INDUSTRIES COMPANY
October 5, 1993
, " ~ ., t
" \"',' ~ t...
.." .
l '~'\' I',; ~.
~ ., I I ~..~,_.I.,
Honorable Mayor Garvey,
Marathon Equipment Co. is sending the attached information in
reference to the Cities recent request to privatize the collection
of recyclables and the purchase of recycling trucks.
Marathon Equipment Co. manufactures recycling truck bodies for the
collection of recyclables. Unfortunately, we were not able to bid
as our local distributor felt the bid specifications were slanted
toward the one manufacturer. It is our opinion that the City has
made a grave error in specifying this type of equipment due to the
inefficiencies of this type of design and is probably the main
reason that the City was substantially under bid by a private
company to provide the collection of recyclables.
Please find attached some analysis between the two systems please
keep in mind that these numbers are based on the operations portion
only and if you would add in all the other cost that are applicable
the situation would be much worse. These numbers are based on
factual data that we have collected by conducting route analysis of
routes around the country of private and municipal recyclers in all
types of programs.
As you can clearly see the method of collection that the City is
recommending is going to cost the residents of Clearwater
substantially more for the service than if they were to utilize
more eff i c i ent co 11 ect; on methods or award the contract to a
private Hauler. Should you like to discuss this information further
please call me.
S i ncere.ly- ,
r / .
C29k5.~~~r
Earl Brocklehurst
Marathon Equipment Co.
Greenline Regional Sales Manager
"".... ......--... ................11 ..........
~.<,'~"~C. ,
~ ~
1: ~
,f ENV\~~'f.
[!1]~[D]D
R()cyclod pilpW t\
....
1h.
(,~
t
. '," " ,
.' .
.. 0
. . . ~' .. '..~. <
0,
, /' 1
" '
: ;~ ", <. (
,:' . ..
.: ;, ~I :,. ,
o .
o' .
A .. . . , A,
C '.
< - , . t
, ... .: j
. . . .
"< '" :t"; ~<!:;'. """'.'.~~'~'';:''".''~. ,.,. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LOW BIDDERS EQUIPMENT
fDlSCRIPTION QUANTITY
F700 CHASSIS 7
NATIONAL 25 YO RECYCLING BODY
RECYCLING BINS 25000
UNf'fPRICl
53,944.00
TOTAL I
3n,608.00
$99,750.00
$4n,358.00
$3.99
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
MARATHON
IDESCRIPTION QUA~TITY
NTERNATIONAL 4700 6
MARATHON DUAL SIDE 34 CU YD
FULLY AUTOMATED
TOP LOADING
WITH PLASTIC COMPACTOR
RECYCLING BINS 25000
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
UNIT PAICl
79,706.00
TOTAL I
478,236.00
.:
$3.99
$99,750.00
$5n,986.00
PRICE DIFFERENCE $100,628.00
INTEREST AND DEPRECIATION
MARATHON
LOW BIDDER
If
I LOW BID SYSTEM
LABOR COST/DRIVERS $16,355.28
OVERTIME/DRIVERS $5,141.88
LABOR COST/HELPER $0.00
OVERTIME/HELPER $0.00
FUEL COST $7,000.00
'INSURANCE $2,450.00
TIRES $3,500.00
REPAIRS/MAINT. $14,000.00
PROPERTY DAMAGE $250.00
SUPERVISOR $3,550.00
INT. & DEPRE. TRUCKS $5,532.03
RECYCLING BINS $1,662.50
DETAILCOST"OF OPERATIONS
$7,006.25
$5.532.03
II
MARATHON SYSTEM
COST PER HOME
CITY MARATHON
$0.65 $0.50
$0.21 $0.03
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.28 $0.22
$0.10 $0.08
$0.14 $0.11
$0.56 $0.46
$0.01 $0.01
$0.14 $0.14
$0.22 $0.28
$0.07 $0.07
$12,481.66
$848.41
$0.00
$0.00
$5,400.00
$211 00.00
$2,700.00
$11.400.00
$250.00
$3,550.00
$7,006.25
$1,662.50
TOTAL PER MONTH $59,441.68 $47,398.82
DIFFERENCE $12,042.86
$2.38
$1.90
.I ..;,'
, :'.! .,:.~,
" ?!
,,:.: t,
. .", ".",
,
. . ,;,
, ; '. . i " ~ _ '
"
L .
'" ~
,.., ,t
,~ i
. ,'. <'
, ~:
I. .,". . ,." '''.
. :..
, -:,' ,~'
...-.;.....1..'
ASSUMPTIONS
CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA
I CLEARWATER BID SYSTEM
PROPOSED NUMBER OF TRUCKS
NUMBER OF LOOSE CUBIC YARDS
NUMBER OF DRIVE BYS PER DAY
TIME IN MIN, PER STOP
WEIGHT PER STOP IN LBS
TOTAL LOAD WEIGHT IN TONS
WEIGHT PER YARD IN LBS
NUMBER OF RECYCLABLES
NUMBER OF DRIVE BY PEA TRUCK
PARTICPATION LEVEL @ %
TIME SPENT AT M.R.F.lN HOURS
ESTIMATED # OF TRIPS TO M.R.F.
TIME ON BREAKS IN HOURS
TIME ON LUNCH IN HOURS
ACTUAL HOMES COLLECTED
DRIVER HOURLY RATE
HELPER HOURLY RATE
LABOR BURDEN @ 0/0
MARA THON SYSTEM
PROPOSED NUMBER OF TRUCKS
NUMBER OF LOOSE CUBIC YAROS
NUMBER OF DRIVE BYS PER DAY
TIME IN MIN, PER STOP
WEIGHT PER STOP IN LBS
TOTAL LOAD WEIGHT IN TONS
WEIGHT PER YARD IN LBS
NUMBER OF RECYCLABLES
NUMBER OF DRIVE BY PER TRUCK
PARTICPATION LEVEL@ %
TIME SPENT AT M.R.F.IN HOURS
ESTIMATED # OF TRIPS TO M.R.F.
TIME ON BREAKS IN HOURS
TIME ON LUNCH IN HOURS
ACTUAL HOMES COLLECTED
DRIVER HOURLY RATE
HELPER HOURLY RATE
LABOR BURDEN @ 0/0
7
25
5000
1
12
2.66
212.57
6
714
62.00%
1
2
0.5
0.5
443
$9.50
$7.50
42.00%
TOTAL HOURS ON ROUTE
10.38
6
33
5000
0.75
12
3.1
187.88
6
833
62.00%
1
1
0.5
0.5
517
$9.50
$7.50
42.00%
TOTAL HOURS ON ROUTE
8.46
- . I
I
I
I
'1
-...:,'
.\
\
t .~.',:
~^
As you can see the Marathon System would save the City of Clearwater much more than
the savings realized by purchasing what appears to be initially less expensive
equipment. The savings are even more dramatic when taken over a 5 year period
TOTAL SAVINGS
$722,571.78
'J',.
/....:)
.......-...__.._........ .~..? ~It~'
.; ,
":.1.
"
~ ~ :tt(lI'~/~3
#- f ----...
c:!J)
<Ml
''':.''/.
~!
SCOPE
. FULL SERVICE CITYWIDE
RESIDENTIAL & MULTI-FAMILY
RECYCLING WITH AGGRESSIVE
EDUCATION AND MARKETING
PROGRAMS
, . CURBSIDE/SORT FOR
,. APPROXIMATELY 26,500 RESIDENCES
... " .,. MULTI-FAMILY FOR 230 COMP'LEXES
. . PROCESSING & MARKETING
RECYCLABLES
eMUL TI-MATERIAL DROPOFF CENTER
, . . ',' : :
.. COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS.
" ;'
"'. ,,'..,.'
"
,
. ,
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
,
i '
! "
,
i '
1
,
!. "
RESIDENTIAL
__ ONCE WEEKLY COLLECTION
,'. .'
"::,', ' _ CURBSIDE/SORT - NEWSPAPER, ALUMINUI\.~ &
STEEL CANS, 3 COLORS OF GLASS, PLASTIC
MILK/WA TER JUGS & PLASTIC SODA BOTTLES
e PROVIDE ONE 18 GAL. PLASTIC BIN
TAKE ALL ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL
. LEAVE WITH NOTE IF UNACCEPTABLE
e EXTRA BIN.. COST + $1.00 HANDLING
BIN TOTER.. COST + $1.00 HANDLING
__ "BACK DOOR" SERVICE TO QUALIFIED
RESIDENTS AT NO EXTRA CHARGE
_ 7 ROUTES PER DAY (5 DAY WEEK)
757 HOMES PER ROUTE/PER DAY
2 VEHICLE BACK UP
MONTHLY FEE:
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
- ~
$1.99 $2.05 $2.12 $2.05 $1.99
,; ": ,;'" l .
:*. :'..~, :,', t ~ ' ."<
,
'. . '..
.,
I
,
"
; ,
/
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
""'
MULTI-FAMILY
. SERVICE TAILORED TO EACH
, COMPLEX
. RECOMMEND NEWSPAPER,
ALUMINUM/STEEL CANS AND 3
COLORS OF GLASS
.. 90 GAL. SEMI-AUTOMATED CART
..
I
"
.'
,
~:,
, .
. SERVED BY ONE OR MORE CLUSTERS
OF SEMI-AUTOMATED CARTS
.... .'
. RATE VARIES BY SIZE AND NUMBER
OF CARTS. IN EVERY CASE,
RECYCLING WILL BE A SAVINGS'OVER
GARBAGE RATES.
. i
. t.~ ,
',' ..
': ,',. '/.
, . -', ,
" ) ," ..'
,~ '.. ~
.' " " I, ~ , :;' ... '
'" >< .... -,...." ".
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
MULTI-MATERIAL DROPOFF
CENTER
. ONE CENTRAL LOCATION
CONSOLIDATED AT THE SOLID WASTE
COMPLEX
. SEVEN DAY PER WEEK SERVICE
. COLLECT NEWSPAPER, ALUMINUM
AND STEEL CANS, CORRUGATED
CARDBOARD, PLASTIC MI.LK/WATER
JUGS, PLASTIC SODA BOTTLES,
SEPARATED 3 COLORS OF GLASS
AND OFFICE PAPER
. CLEARLY MARKED CONTAINERS
. EXPLANATORY SIGNAGE
., '
. NO CHARGE TO THE CITY FOR
SERVICING
. . . ~ t ' , " <, " ., - .
" > .' " A .
"
Y.
.
"
. '~
: ,...:.', .
. , ., ,
- -
., . .
; : ,.".~ . ' "
", '<'. ': \
. ' ,
, .
~ ,,' ~
, " .
. '.! .'
. '. ..... ~' '.; . .
. ' ,'<: -; i', ';
,
, '.
.. i: ,,: . ,:..'...~ ':>:.. ..,.:.~:, >.-, '... '.. ','
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
COMMUNITY SERVICE
PROGRAMS
. FREE MULCH FOR RESIDENTS AT
DROPOFF CENTER
. FREE COLLECTION OF OFFICE &
COMPUTER PAPER AT CLEARWATER
SCHOOLS
. FREE COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES
AT COASTAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD
CLEANUPS
. PROVIDE RECYCLING CONTAINERS
FOR SPECIAL EVENTS SPONSORED
BY CITY
. MAINTAIN & SERVICE CITY MARINA
MINI-DROPOFF CENTER
, "f_~
, :',.
:i
;,
~,":
.i. ',. d .
. .1
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
PROCESSING & MARKETING
"'.:
. .
... PROCESSING CENTER AT SOLID WASTE
COMPLEX
; .'
:". .. SCREEN MATERIALS AND SHIP TO .
" MARKET
.1. '
t';... '.',
. THROUGHPUT PROCESSING SYSTEM'
..DUMPING RAMP
.';..OPTIMIZE PROFITS
, USE ESTABLISHED MARKETS ..':.,....: ..' '.
" . USE SPOT MARKET
PROCESS & MARKET FOR OTHER,'....
CITIES
USE RAIL SPUR FOR MARKET
FLEXIBILITY
. ~. .' '. '. ~
. <, . . J .
." " <' ,~, " '.. ' , . ,. ' ,
~ ' '
"
,,'1
, ,
, ,
\ " '-:,.", -;'.;._:.:r. ':,1 ,t -': ~:' .. "
"', ~}
, tt
" .: ~,:1.
/~
; :~!~f:.."i~~
~ to LO 0 0
0) Ct) Ct) ~ 0)
0)
.,- th- Y} ~ fit
0 --I
Z <( (Y) 0 LO 0 0
C\I C\I ~ LO
- m
W a: 0)
w .,- th- Y} ~ fit
0: ~ "
I- ~ N 0 LO to 0
0) .,- ,.- .,-
I- w 0) fit
--I .,- th- Y} ~
W a:l
<(
~ LO 0
--I .,- to LO . 0
0 0) I'- .,- I-
0: 0) 00
>- th- tit ~'
.,- ~ fit
<( 0 0...
Cll?S ,..' ./
W '0:
~ a: 0 0 0 W . . :<:'~~
0 0 0... ' ..~
0) .,- ,.- ~ ,... <C
en 0...
0) 00
- ~
0: a: z .,- th- Y7 ~ tit
W 0 Z
<( ~ I- 0
a: W
0 0 0 0 ..J
W 0) <C
W ~ 0... CD ~ ,.- ~ LO tD
W 0) Cf)a:
>- a: 0:0
() .,- th- fJ7 ~ fit Ou.
<( - .....J
a: 000
>< W 0... + ao
0 0 0 0 0 f + * wZ
--I 0 <X) <0 ~ C\J wW
0: a:
0 T- 0 II-
::. (/) Y} Y} Y} Y} a: 0 t-W
Y} a: 0:0
W 00:
a.. <( u.o...
~ 0 0 wO
(!JW
aJ (f) - <I-
J- 0:0
C/) 0 en en W
~ w-,
a: <( :=5 >0
<co:
W <( --I cno...
Z () ~ a.. Cf)...,.
~C>
(!J ~.
0
V <Xl
m CO
m
I, ~ ~
0
' .': (V) (\J
0
m I'-
-I m
<( .
z ~ ~
-
CI:
UJ
w 0
L a.: ~ , ' C\J 0
" m I'-
, m
J-- ~ I, ,I
,.... ~
I"
" w
l- I'
-I . 0
UJ m . ~ <Xl
:3 m LO
~ ':, m
,.
() ~ ~
a.: >- "
I.
<( () 0
W I, 0 CO
m I'-
~ a:: . :. m
en ~ ~
. ,.1
- '.,.
a.: a: I
W I, 0
Z 1 .
<( ~ 0 I m 0
t- , . " CO <Xl
a: m
UJ ~ W I ~ ~
0..
>- a: w
<( 0 f
w -
>< a:
-I 0.. ~
() 0
0 ~ ::J
(J) q ~ ~ z
,- ff?)
-
ff?) ~
:::>
--I
<C
~;.:,-... '
.. ,
~. , ,
~.. .
o
z
w
('t)a:
0>.....
.
~v
O)~
.,....,...
0:0
Ow
lJ.......
...10
<(w
::>-,
.....0
ua:
<0..
~
'-'
<
z
z
o
~
~~
0\
~N
~O\
zt
o
0\
~Q\
=00
~t
z
~
~
~
U
~
=
, .". '.
I
. , .,~
, '
, < \ .
00
~
Z
-<
rJj
~
o
==
~
, "
o
~
~
Q
("l
,-..l
o
o
~
o
rJ:)
Q
\C
o
~
o
M
~
Q\
--
N
Q\
~
N
Q\
--
,..-4
Q\
~
,..-4
Q\
e
Q\
t
<:>
0\
--
Q\
ce
t
<::>
l()
l()
c=\
~
Q\
N
~
~
~
C\
~
~
I:'-
~
<=
l'-
~
l()
l()
\C
l()
an
~
~
~
\C
~
~
~
lI)
~
C\
="
~
\C>
~
II}
~
~
l"-
I:'-
II}
~
~
II}
..
fI3-
~
;J
Z
~~
~O
....~
f.+
-:,1.
,
",'
,
,!
~
S!
l%l
r:s
Z
o
e::
-
~
o
-~
W)c:z-:l
~~
~~
~~
~B
~~
Sri}
~Z
-0
rl}c..>
~~
;':0
~~
~~
~~
~~
Qc:z-:l
~@
Z~
c..>
825
rl}f-l
~~
rl}Q
~rI}
Q~
i:Ji:J
00
!:&:
~t5~
z~__
~z~
~00'
"f-l1"'4
'I,'
'.1,...,
;1-'
;~.' ..'
,
,..
. ),' , }: ....
~ ....<c.l :"...c:~", "" . J,' ,(. : ~:.,
c
o
I-
f/)
1-
>
"-
e
(1)
.....
U)
cu
~
"C
1-
-
o
en
L..
(1)
.....
cu
~
cu
(1)
-
()
'I-
o
~
1-
<(
:E
0:::
>-0
-Iu..
io
<(~
u..a.
.J..:E
J-<(
SO:::co
:EC)C')
06~~
...Ja...c:
~ C) ~
J-zo
z-l::
w...J+J
9~~
(/)00')
ww~
~~
...J~
...J<(
<(w
ffi>-
>.-.
o~
w
>
-
u.
o
00
Q')
Q')
T""
......
Q')
Q')
T""
CD
Q')
Q')
T""
Lt)
Q')
Q')
~
"Ilt
Q')
Q')
~
0:: U)I
<(-I
W <(I
>-....
.0
I.C)....
0(0
o r-
0> l{)
-
('t')v
o r-
('t')r-
-
~
(f)-
o (W')
0> (W')
~ (W')
0(0
Nf'..
('t')(O
~
(fl-
Ov
IDO
co 1O
-
~ (W')
o 1O
('t') <D
~
(fl-
l()(W')
o <D
o>r-
COf'..
('t')()')
~ 1O
~
(fl-
0> co
('t') (W')
vr-
-
~ co
CO(W')
0> LO
(fl-
v~
o>LO
NCO
-
(00
VCO
Or-
<OM
(:f7
--
~N
--
tn~
(1) 0
::::J 0
cU
(1)C')
~ c
o:::~
~
- ...
ct1 (1)
+-'c.
~o
v
co
(W')
()')
co
1O
r-
LO
co
~
M
~
<D
<0
1O
M
~
co
~
<0
N
~
r-
r-
~
l()
r-
o
r-
~
N
~
~
o
oq-
oq-
-
LO
<.0
co
-
C\I
0.
Q)
::::J
C
Q)
>
Q)
0::
en
e
.-
e
.-
~
E
Q)
0::
co N~
om
C\l0
-
~ r-
O>N
('\Ir-
CON
~m
('\10
LO<.o
r-oo
Nr-
<DN
('t') m
ON
CO r-
<DO
N('\I
0<.0
Ov
r-LO
Nr-
LO <.0
('\Ir-
CO 0
o LO
('t') co
l.() T"'"
vN
NT"'"
ON
Of'..
l.() CO
-
NT"'"
~O>
('t')r-
~
--
M"Ilt
--
U'I
tJ)~
....,C/)
tJ) 0
00
0-
C\1
"t:S~
(1)0.
.~ C\1
u.O
. .
tJ)
tn
(1)
..J
, '> ;f'l
,,~ .' ,~~,
,1
.
1
"
v
CO
o
r-
r-
T"'"
en
Q)
'0
c
Q)
0>
C
:.;::J
c
8
,I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
.E
Q)
2:
Q)
(/)
Q)
'-
-0
C
ro
(/)
Q)
(/)
c
Q)
0-
X
Q)
0>
C
:.;::J
~
Q)
0-
o
CO
N
o
()')
r-
T"'"
<D
()')
co
<0
C\I
T-
(/)
'-
Q)
c
. Oco
(/)......
~cQ)
.cO(/)
~~~
u (/)
>.'-0...
oQ)x.....
Q) ...... Q) (/)
(/) Q)
'- 0- U L..
'+-ECQ)
o 0.....
Q) ::l .c .~
-0 U
m\f-Q)c
(/) 0 g m
E(/)m-
o Q) E co
L.. en c.
'+- co L.. .-
(/) ..c 0 0
~ 0 'CO) .~
"P"< '- '-
Q)::lo..c.
L.. 0- U 'to-
o _ c 0
.....en".......
Q) Q) '"~ c
c: 0 C Q)
(/)0e:.2 E
:JQ)->'
o.enjg ~
C/) Q)o~ Q)
O>O>c'-
C co .- -0
=~Ec
.- \U U co
.c 0> co
E - (/)
1:)u.....
o Q) C c:
~'-mQ)
, .- E
'U -0 0> >.
2 I .C co
co en == c.
'-Q)..oQ)
Q) 0
c: .- Q)- C/)
Q)e:>co
0> Q) .- ..c
.....0
C/) en m '-
Q)-~::l
:J ~ .~ 0-
~ 0 .~ m
> ~ E tU
Q)Q)UQ)
rxo...<(--,
M
..q
LO
l()
r-
co
<0
o
T-
V
to-
C/)
(1)
::::J
C
(1)
>
(1)
0::
.....
(1)
Z
g
,g
e
a.
C")
e?
U)
~..-.....~.....-.-. N
.,- N ('t') -q- C3
.......... '-' ............. '-"'" ,..
i, , .. ."
"': '1'" ,,',:' '
.., , .I" '" ~ ' \ ,i '.:' <' ,
.. .
< L'<
, \'" ".'
. i ;\~ '\! ',~ I ' .
" .
.. ,
. ,...;
,j
1.
".' ';;
, ,~}.
. ".- . . ", .
. '
,
"
, '~. ";:".< ':' ~-k'."
, "\
",0: ,', " : ,~..:~:$~
.. ' ,
,.~ < .,.-.
,
,
,
'!
"
RECYCLING
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
RESIDENTIAL & MULTI-FAMILY
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
.. .
",
CAPITAL PURCHASES
$75,000
75,000
25.000
$175,000
RECYCLING BUILDING .
PROCESSING RAMP
BAR CODE SYSTEM
LEASE PURCHASE
$548,000
8 RECYCLING TRUCKS
. 50.000"
, , "$598,000
Sl~73~OOO
MULTI-FAMILY COLLECTION
VEHICLE
NOTE: BALER FOR COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY PROCESSING
WILL BE PRESENTED WITH COMMERCIAL PROGRAM.
ESTIMATED COST $125,000.
~..
, . . '. ~ ~ , < ',:. ,'. A . ,. -
'/..1:
'.:;,.
, ,
. ~;"." \<-' ",:
RECYCLING PROGRAM
ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING
Residential and multi-family recycling programs will be staffed initially as
follows:
...
One (1) Recycling Coordinator (Range G)
One (1) Recycling Representative (Range G)
One (1) Supervisor (R...60)
Nine (9) San itation Equipment Operators (R-48)
One (1) Equipment Operator (R-39)
Two ~ Maintenance Workers 1 (R-36)
TOTAL 15 positions
In order to accomplish the initial staffing as indicated above, seven (7) new
positions will be required and eight (8) existing positions applied or
converted to conform to the recycling staffing table above.
~ One (1) Assistant Superintendent of Solid Waste/Special Services
(Range I) converted to Recycling Representative (recommended Range
G).
~ One (1) Public Information Representative (R-46) converted to
Recycling Coordinator (recommended Range G and funded in Solid
Waste ).
.. One (1) Solid Waste Supervisor (R-60) remains the same..
~ One (1) Sanitation Equipment Operator (R-48) remains the same.
~ Two (2) Heavy Equipment Operators (R...SO) converted to Sanitation
Equipment Operators (R-48).
~ Two (2) Solid Waste Workers (R-41) converted to Maintenance Workers
1 (R-36).
~ Six (6) new Sanitation Equipment Operator positions (R-48) will be
required (recycling vehicle operators).
~ One (1) new Equipment Operator position (R-39) will be required.
July 1, 1995, one additional Sanitation Equipment Operator (R-48) will be
required for the multi-family program.
,'. .
. '.. I
.. ~ < ,
, ",'.' :" "
~ . 0;
.,.. " I
- '. . _, . I
, ,. . - .
SOLID WASTE
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
MONTHLY RATES
UTILITY BILL APPLICABLE
TO SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING
'e S.W. COLLECTION
BEFORE
$11.77
AFTER.
$11.02
'_ DISPOSAL
5.28
5.28
e RECYCLING 1.99
-- TOTAL CHARGE $17.05 . $18.29
TO HOMEOWNER
....
, ... . ,
, , , , .....i
i' 'NOTE: ACTUAL INCREASE FOR RECYCLING IS $1.24
PER MONTH
AGENDA
LJ
I-Jj
q$
-
..""
ITEM #
2
j;t)G9
"
.,'~
i.
" ~ :.
, :. ,< ~
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
j\;~
I tern #
Meet i n9 Date:
\1\ IS(C?)
SUBJECT:
RECYCLING CONTRACT
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION:
Award recycling contract to the City of Clearwater for five (5) years beginning
January 3, 1994.
R and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
On June 1, 1993, the City Commission approved the Request for Competitive Proposal for recycling. This was sent
to 19 companies on June 4, 1993. A pre-bid conference was held on June 16, 1993. As a result of this pre-bid
conference, several changes were made to the Request for Competitive Proposal.
Eight proposals were submitted to the City. A review team appointed by Michael Wright included Bill Baird, General
Services Director, Bill Baker, Public Works Director, and John Scott, Utilities Customer Service Manager. Kathy
Rice, Deputy City Manager, was asked to head the team and to request the Clearwater Chamber of Commerce to
suggest a citizen to be on the team. James McCurtain, Manager of Sears in Countryside, was selected.
Proposals were received from the following companies:
1. Boone Waste Industries
2. Browning-Ferris Industries of FL., Inc.
3. City of Clearwater
4. Disposall (Metro Recycling, Inc.)
5. Kimmins Recycling Corporation
6. Waste Aid Systems
7. Waste Collection Services, Inc.
8. Waste Management of Tampa
The team read and individually reviewed each of the eight proposals. The evaluation criteria is attached. Each sheet
as filled out by each member of the committee is on file in the City Manager's office as well as the full competitive
Revi ewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
Originating Dept:
City Manager
et(.U
Costs:
Total
C~ission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Deni ed
o Continued to:
-12~~
N/A
~ fLl-~
User Dept:
Current Fiscal Yr.
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
at Not Requi red
Affected Parties
o Notified
o Not Requi red
Flndi ng Source:
[] Capital Imp.
[] Operati ng
[] Other
Appropriation Code:
Attachl8ents:
Agreement
Strategic Plan
Evaluation Criteria
9/08/93 Minutes
o None
\ ; . , ' l,t!, '
':.
, .
. .' ~
,_,J
- 2 -
bid of each bidder. The team met on July 19, 1993, and after much discussion, listed the top two firms as Kimmins
and City of Clearwater. Daniel Deignan, Finance Director, was asked to review the financial information and to call
references for Kimmins. ,Kathy Rice and Bill Baird also called references.
The team met again on Thursday, July 22, 1993, and focused on the price proposals, particularly for multi-family and
commercial to rank the top two firms. After much discussion, it was decided to ask the top two firms to explain to
the team their proposal and to provide more information about customer service. The multi-family bids were explained
and re-reviewed.
Mr. McCurtain's view was invaluable to the team. He was concerned both from a resident's and a business person's
perspective that the City's bid did not include any guarantees. If a private company bids badly, they must make up
the loss some other way but the same is not true of the City. Ms. Rice also expressed the perspective that it was easier
to get into the recycling business than to get out of it because of the initial investment in capital.
Monday, July 26, 1993, the team met with each of the top bidders. After review of the presentations, reference
checks, financial information and a synopsis of the multi-family and single family rates, a vote was taken. There was
a unanimous opinion that the City of Clearwater should be awarded the contract if a contract could be negotiated
addressing two concerns.
1. That someone in the City have full responsibility for making the program work and that language be
added to the contract to require an audit every year. If the independent audit showed a negative
variance to the projections the City had made in the bid, i.e., more expenditures or less revenues, then
the whole program would be rebid.
2. That Commercial not be part of the contract since the law was so new and the City could not issue an
exclusive contract as they could for single family and multi-family residences.
The new contract is attached and changes negotiated are in italics. Some sections were deleted since they did not apply
and the dates for implementation were changed since trucks could not be ordered until the City Commission approved
the contract.
Several negotiating meetings were held with Bob Brumback and Paul Nystrom. The committee asked that a business
plan be submitted for the Commission's review.
Kimmins, represented by Ed Armstrong, sent letters to all City Commissioners and met with Deputy City Manager
Rice. They stated that they were not filing a bid protest but wanted to understand the City's perspective.
"
. 1 ..
~, ;, ~ ',"
AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 1993, by and between the CITY
OF CLEARWATER, a Florida municipality, with its principal place of business located at City Hall,
112 S. Osceola Avenue, P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748, hereinafter referred to as the
"City," and the CITY OF CLEARWATER SOLID WASTE DIVISION (CSW), with its principal place
of business located at 1180 Russell Street, Clearwater, Florida 34615, hereinafter referred to as the
"Collector. II
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, the City is duly authorized to enter into an agreement for the collection of recyclable
materials within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Collector has presented satisfactory evidence to the City that it is in an adequate physical
and financial position to produce such service in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City has found that entering into a residential and multi-family recycling agreement with
the Collector is in the best interest of the public;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants herein contained, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1 - SCOPE OF WORK
The Collector shall provide recycling services as described in this Agreement from and within the City
of Clearwater, Florida.
The Collector shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, skills, tools, machinery, supervision, facilities
and other services to provide the recycling services required herein. The Collector shall pay, at its
expense, all costs, expenses, license fees, and charges required to perform the recycling services.
The Collector shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal rules and regulations.
"
The relationship between the parties shall be limited to performance of this Agreement solely in
accordance with its terms. No party shall have any responsibility whatsoever with respect to services
provided or contractual obligations assumed by the other party and nothing in this Agreement shall be
deemed to constitute either party as a partner, agent, or legal representative of the other party or to create
any fiduciary relationship. The Collector's status shall be that of an independent contractor. '
..f
-1-
,'j
~.'
, '
General Scope of Work
The Collector will provide a comprehensive recycling program to the residential and multi-family sectors
of the City. The single-family residential curbside program will commence citywide January 3, 1994.
The multi-family program will be phased in over three (3) years (January 1994 through 1997). This will
include the collection, processing and marketing of specified recyclable materials from single-family
homes, multi-family units, and one multi-material drop-off center. Administration and coordination of
the program, public education, billing, and the collection of yard waste and scrap metal (excluding
aluminum and steel cans) for recycling will also remain the responsibility of the City's Solid Waste
Division.
General Responsibility For All Recycling Programs
1. The Collector will process, remove contaminants and market all materials through brokers
or directly to end users or other companies that will use the materials in the manufacture
of new products. No recyclable materials collected in this program will be disposed of
as solid waste at landfills or waste-to-energy plants.
2. The Collector will furnish monthly, quarterly, annual or more frequent reports to the City
on recycling program performance. All reports will include participation and set out data,
volume of materials collected by type and other such information that may be requested.
3. All collection vehicles will display the Collector's recycling logo and telephone number.
1.1 Residential Curbside/Curbsort Recycling Program
A. To serve all active residential accounts with once-a-week collection.
To be implemented on or before April 5, 1994.
Collector's responsibilities:
1.
Two (2) weeks prior to start date or no later than two (2) weeks prior to April 5,
1994, the Collector will provide each household with one yellow IS-gallon plastic
recycling container made with a minimum of 30% recycled material. These
containers will be purchased and thereafter owned by the Collector, and will be
stamped with the Collector's recycling logo and telephone number.
2. The Collector will provide with the containers full explanatory literature as
attached, including notification of first and subsequent collection days, what
materials are acceptable and how to prepare them, and any other pertinent
information. Included with the literature will be one complimentary magnet as
attached per household stating that household's collection day.
-2-
f 'i
, .
'; i
"'.,4 "
. ...: ," ,
,n
"
3. The Collector will provide extra containers and wheeled bin toters on request as
follows:
a. Second and subsequent containers, not stamped with the Collector's
recycling logo, at cost plus a handling charge of $1.00. These will become
the property of the resident.
b. Replacement of damaged or missing containers, not the result of negligence
(assume 10% replacement/year), at no charge. These will be stamped with
the Collector's recycling logo and will remain the property of the Collector.
c. Wheeled bin toters at cost plus a handling charge of $1.00. These will
become the property of the resident.
4. The Collector will provide once weekl y curbside/ curbsort collection of the
following recyclables:
a. Newspapers and their inserts;
b. Clear, green and brown glass bottles and jars, no lids (labels acceptable);
c. Aluminum cans;
d. Steel (tin) cans, labels acceptable;
e. Plastic soda bottles and milk/water jugs, no lids.
5. To record participation and other data at each household by electronic devices such
as bar-coders on minimum of two (2) collection vehicles, bar-coding labels, or
equivalent, to be provided on all 18-gallon containers.
6.
The Collector will provide "back door" collection of recyc1ables for qualified
handicapped and elderly customers at no extra charge above the standard recycling
fee. Qualified customers are those with a doctor's note requesting this service for
their patients. This service will also be provided on request to customers without
a doctor's note; however, in these cases, double the standard recycling fee will be
charged .
:1
. 'I
7. If unacceptable materials are found in a container, the Collector will leave an
explanatory note, see Attachment (3), in the container with those materials. Any
acceptable recyclables placed at the curb or next to the recycling container on the
scheduled recycling collection day will be picke.d up at no extra charge.
B.
Multi-Family Recycling Program
I
The Collector will serve not less than 20,000 multi-family units (230 apartment complexes,
condominiums and mobile home parks) with once weekly collection. I
I
, ,
-3-
j'J~,
"
,:~
1.
Current multi-family complexes served:
Calendar 1994: additional
Calendar 1995: additional
Calendar 1996: additional
35 (March 1993)
65
65
.M
~
Collector's Responsibilities:
1. The Collector's representatives will visit each targeted complex to establish, on a
case-by-case basis, what materials can feasibly be collected and what configuration
and number of containers are required, given space limitations.
2. The Collector will provide each complex with sufficient containers (wherever
possible constructed of recycled or recyclable materials), varying from standard
dumpsters to 90-gallon semi-automated carts to I8-gallon curbside collection bins
according to the service level required, to collect up to all of the following
separated materials:
a.
b.
c.
Newspapers and their inserts;
Commingled aluminum and steel cans, labels acceptable;
Clear, green and brown glass bottles and jars, no lids (labels acceptable).
'i
These containers will be provided by the Collector. They will be labeled with a
Collector's recycling logo and telephone number and a set of easily readable
recycling instructions.
3. The Collector will maintain in a clean condition and repair and replace containers
as needed.
4. The Collector will maintain a regularly updated list of contact persons, phone
numbers, collection days and container configurations for each mul~-family
account.
1.2 Multi-Material Recycling Drop-off Center
Collector's responsibilities:
1. The Collector will establish and service a multi-material recycling
drop-off center located at. the City Solid Waste Complex, 1701
North Hercules A venue, on landscaped City of Clearwater property,
to be open to the public seven (7) days a week. In the event that the
Solid Waste Complex is not completed by January 3, 1994, this
drop-off center will be temporarily located at the Cultural Arts
-4-
"'"
. .' , ,. . l.~ '- _
, ' ,'. ~
'.t
~ "
Center, 1776 Drew Street. This is the site of an existing drop-off
center and is centrally located for the residents of the City.
2. The Collector will ensure that the site will be adequately equipped to accommodate
separated recycling containers for the following materials:
a. Newspapers and their inserts;
b. Clear glass bottles and jars, no lids (labels acceptable);
c. Green glass bottles and jars, no lids (labels acceptable);
d. Brown glass bottles and jars, no lids (labels acceptable);
e. Aluminum cans;
f. Steel (tin) cans, labels acceptable;
g. PETE plastic soda bottles, no lids;
h. HDPE plastic milk/water jugs, no lids;
i. Corrugated cardboard, flattened;
j. White office paper and computer paper (effective with the opening of the
North Hercules site).
3. These containers will be provided by the Collector. They will be labeled with the
Collector's recycling logo, telephone number and signage to clearly indicate the
materials to be collected in each container. Signage giving complete instructions
for the use of the entire drop-off center will also be posted.
4. In addition to recycling containers, the Collector will provide and service at no
charge one or more clearly labeled receptacles for unrecyclable trash and garbage.
5. The Collector will service daily (either empty or exchange) all recycling and trash
containers which are over three-quarters full, seven (7) days a week.
6. The Collector will monitor, maintain in a clean condition, and remove litter from
the drop-off center site.
7~
The Collector will maintain in a clean condition, repair and replace all recycling.
and trash containers and container labels as needed (assuming 10%
replacement/year) .
, 8. Free mulch will be available at the drop-off site for citizens' use as required. A
containment area will be constructed. The Collector will haul the mulch necessary
to replenish the supply at no additional cost.
1.3' Community Service Programs
The following community selVice programs will be provided at no additional cost to the City:
-5-
".} ,
i1'
I "';' "
','" - <.'\
i, '.' .'
",,";, :'\,
1" _ ,1.'
'. I' ., .
',t' ",..:__
~., , ,;
I, '
,.~ >; :'.,;. n ,..: 'j._:..1 ;.; '.. '.....: '... .
, I
1. See 1.2.8 above.
2. The Collector will provide for the collection of office and computer paper from the
nineteen (19) public schools in the City at no charge. Each school requesting this
service will be provided with two 90-gallon semi-automated carts, one each for
office and computer paper, and collection will be weekly.
3. On request and at no charge, the Collector will provide equipment and employees
to collect recyclables during coastal and neighborhood cleanups in the City.
4. On request and at no charge, the Collector will provide containers for the
collection of recyc1ables at City-sponsored special events such as fairs and festivals.
5. At no charge, the Collector will maintain and service weekly the public
drop-off' center located at the City marina.
"mini
1.4 Rates
Rates to be charged are in Attachment "A. H
ARTICLE 2 -- TERM
The term of the Agreement shall befor a 5-year period beginning JanuIJ1)' 3, 1994 with residential service
to begin on or before April 5, 1994. An annual peiformance andfinancial review oJthe 5-year plan will
be completed within three months of the end of each fiscal year by the Budget Advisory Committee,
except, however, the first period of review will be from January 1994 through September 30, 1995.
Thereafter, the review will be October through September annually. The financial 5-year pro fonntl is
included and made a pan of the contract in Attachment "B. H The performance sections of the contract
include Article 1, all sections; Article 3, all sections,. and Article 4, all sections. The report from the
Budget Advisory Committee will be submitted to the City Commissioners by February 1 oj each year.
This repon will be used to determine substantial compliance with the terms oj the contract. If the
Collector is found to be materially in non-compliance, the contract will be rebid to private haulers.
ARTICLE 3 -- RFSPONSmILITIES OF COLLECTOR
3.1 . Compliance with Ordinance
The Collector shall comply with all applicable provisions of the City's Solid Waste Ordinance.
-6-
..
.~.
.
, ,
.
"
.;<~;!
, ,. ~."
...,.
'.':51
, .:;.-;
. .:;'~:J
j
;:1
"
"
.'
:.:~
, ,
'." < ',t-
< ,
"
... -
"
",
.~ .~J
3.2 Laws and Regulations
The Collector shall submit Public Entity Crimes. The Collector shall comply with all laws of the state
of Florida regarding labor and compensation and with all other statutes, ordinances, and regulations
applicable or having the force of law.
3.3 Subcontractors
The Collector shall not use subcontractors without the express written permission of the City.
3.4 Free Services
The Collector shall not provide any free services to anyone for the collection of recyclables,
transportation or disposal of recycled goods; provided, however, the community service programs stated
herein are to be provided.
3.5 Restrictions on Collection of Recyc1ables
The Collector shall not:
1.
collect any recyclables not in proper containers, refuse bins, or bundled, except as
otherwise provided herein;
2. allow its employees to expose themselves to any risks or dangers, including the
danger of being bitten by dogs, in order to perform their duties;
3.
permit any of its employees to scavenge;
4. collect any hazardous waste.
3.6 Preservation of Property
The Collector shall preserve from damage all property along the route of the collection of recyclables,
or which is in the vicinity of or is in any way affected by the performance of the collection of
recyclables.
This applies, but is not limited, to the public utilities, trees, lawn areas, building monuments or markers,
fences, pipe and underground structures, public streets (except natural wear and tear of streets resulting
from legitimate use thereof by the Collector), and wherever such property is damaged due to the activities
of the Collector, it shall be immediately restored to its original condition by the Collector at its own
expense.
-7-
.. ".
.',..,. ... .'.
" .'1
, '~,
. . , ,,l
'i,
..;
r' :
.... ., ~
:.' :'\}..
:;!
In case of failure on the part of the Collector to restore such property, or make good such damage or
injury, the City may, upon 48 hours written notice to the Collector, proceed to repair, rebuild, or
otherwise restore such property as may be deemed necessary, and to bill the cost thereof to the Collector.
In the event that the Collector damages a container, so as to render the container useless to store
recyclables, the Collector shall provide a new container to replace the damaged container. In the event
that a damaged container has not been replaced within 48 hours of receipt by the City of a complaint,
the City may provide the container and bill the Collector for such cost.
3.7 Spillage and Litter
The Collector shall be responsible for picking up and removing all spillage and litter resulting from the
performance of services by the Collector under this Agreement.
3.8 Identi fication
All recycling collection vehicles and equipment operated by the Collector shall be clearly marked with
the name of the Collector and its telephone number and the Collector's recycling logo.
All employees of the Collector shall display identification showing them to be employees of the Collector
when on duty.
3.9 Office
The Collector shall maintain an office with regular business hours, five days per week, Monday through
Friday, and shall have adequate personnel and facilities in said office to receive and duly respond to
complaints and questions made or raised by customers of the Collector. Twenty-four hour, seven day
telephone contact capability with the Collector will be provided. Upon receipt of complaints or
notification of problems, the Collector shall address and resolve any problems or complaints the same
day or no later than the following regular workday. Such problems may include:
1. missed pickups;
2. littering;
3. damaged or missing containers;
4. contamination with unacceptable materials.
3.10 Records
The Collector shall make all of its books, files, records, and other documents in connection with its
operations under this Agreement available and open for inspection in the Collector's office by the City
at reasonable times upon reasonable notice. The City shall have the right to perform audits of the
Collector's records at its own expense.
. ':
~
-8-
,\
..'J
,'.,
, :::{
ARTICLE 4 -- SPECIAL CONDITIONS
4.1 Representatives
The authorized representative of the City for purposes of this Agreement shall be the City Manager. The
authorized representative of the Collector for purposes of this Agreement shall be Robert M. Brumback,
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities. Either party may change its representative upon five (5)
days written notice to the other party.
4.2 Recycling Fund
The City will set up a separate independent fund called "Recycling. II All revenues and costs will be
accounted for in this fund.
4.3 Bond and Insurance
Appropriate coverages will be provided by the City's self-insurance fund, Risk Management
Division, and paid by the inteifund charges to the recycling program. The following coverages
are a minimum:
A. Collector's Liability Insurance
The Collector will purchase and maintain such insurance as well as protect it from claims under
workmen's compensation laws, disability benefit laws, or other similar employee benefit laws;
from claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of
its employees, including claims insured by usual personal injury liability coverage; from claims
for damages because of bodily inj ury, sickness or disease, or death of any person other than its
employees, including claims insured by usual personal injury liability coverage; and from claims
for injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom -- any
or all of which may arise out of or result from the Collector's operations under the Agreement,
whether such operations be by itself or by any subcontractor or anyone directly or indirectly
employed by any of them or for whose acts any of them may be legally liable. This insurance
shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law, whichever
is greater, and shall include contractual liability insurance. Before starting the work, the Collector
will file with the City certificates of such insurance, acceptable to the City. These certificates
shall contain a provision that the coverage afforded under the policies will not be canceled or
materially changed until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City.
-9-
"
B. Insurance Required
1. General
Before starting and until completion of the term of the Agreement, the Collector
shall procure and maintain insurance of the types and to the limits specified in
paragraphs (1) through (5) inclusive below.
The Collector shall require each of its subcontractors to procure and maintain, until
the completion of the subcontractor's work, insurance of the types and to the limits
specified in paragraphs (1) through (5) inclusive below. it shall be the
responsibility of the Collector to insure that all its subcontractors comply with all
of the insurance requirements contained herein relating to such subcontractors.
2. Coverage
The amounts and types of insurance shall conform to the following minimum
requirements:
a. Worker's Compensation - Coverage to apply for all employees for statutory
limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. In addition,
the policy must include the following:
(i) Employer's liability with a limit of $100,000 each accident.
(ii) Notice of Cancellation and Restriction - The policy must be
endorsed to provide the owner with thirty (30) days written notice,
of cancellation and/or restriction.
b.
Comprehensive General Liability - Coverage must be afforded on a form
no more restrictive than the latest edition of the comprehensive general
liability policy filed by the Insurance Services Office and must include:
(i) Minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000
aggregate combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and
Property Damage Liability.
(ii) Premises and/or Operations.
(iii) Independent Contractors.
(iv) Products and/or Completed Operations.
(v) seu Coverages.
-10-
, /'10
, ',,;J
".1
"i
':',1
'I
"
" ,'J
",
~ ,-'" '
"
:.""
, , i <
,"
,'. ' '.:
, ~,.,
(vi) Board Form Property Damage including Completed Operations.
(vii) Contractual coverage applicable to this specific contract including
any hold harmless and/or indemnification agreement.
(viii) Additional Insured - The owner is to be specifically included as an
additional insured.
(ix) Notice of Cancellation and Restriction - The policy must be
endorsed to provide the owner with thirty (30) days written notice
of cancellation and restriction.
c. Comprehensive Automobile Liability - Coverage must be afforded on a
form no more restrictive than the latest edition of the Comprehensive
Automobile Liability Policy filed by the Insurance Services Office and must
include:
(i)
Minimum limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit
for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability.
(ii) Owned Vehicles.
(iii) Hired and Non-owned Vehicles.
(iv) Employee Non-ownership.
(v) Notice of Cancellation and/or Restriction - The policy must be'
endorsed to provide the owner with thirty (30) days written notice
of cancellation and/or restriction.
d.
Certificates of Insurance and Copies of Policies - Certificates of insurance
in triplicate evidencing the insurance coverage specified in the previous
paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive, and certified copies of the policy required
by paragraph (4) shall be filed with the owner before operations are begun.
The required certificates of insurance not only shall name the types of
policies provided, but also shall refer specifically to this contract and
section and the above paragraphs in accordance with which insurance is
being furnished, and shall state that such insurance is as required by such
paragraphs of this contract.
If the initial insurance expires prior to the completion of the work, renewal
certificates of insurance and required copies of policies shall be furnished
thirty (30) days prior to the date of their expiration.
-11-
I
,:i
"
'J
,il
" :~i:
.i
i
, I
'I
j
,I
.., ..\~~
~, .. ~
'~
. i
.'\
". ~ , :. '."
The following cancellation clause must appear on the certificate of
insurance. The present cancellation clause appearing on the certificate must
be X'd out and initialled by the agent of the insurer.
Cancellation - Should any of the above described policies be
canceled before the stated expiration date thereof, insurer will not
cancel same until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice (by
certified mail) has been given to the below named certificate holder.
This prior notice provision is a part of the above described policies.
Job Location:
4.4 Compliance Equal Opportunity Act
During the performance under the terms of this Agreement, the Collector must be in compliance with
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 in that the Collector shall
not, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, discriminate in any form or manner against
the Collector's employees. The Collector in accepting this Agreement shall by acceptance be deemed
to have given assurance to the City that this said ABre.ement as granted by City is conditioned upon the ::
veracity of such assurance.
4.5 Notice of Default and Default of Contract
Should the Collector abandon or delay unnecessarily the performance of, or in any manner refuse or fail
to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement or neglect or refuse to comply with the instructions
of the City relative thereto, the City shall notify the Collector, in writing, of such abandonment, delay,
refusal, failure, or neglect and direct the Collector to comply with all provisions of the Agreement.
Copies of such written notice shall be mailed to the surety that issued the performance and payment
bonds. the notice shall be presented to the City Commission for action. The City Commission shall hear
the matter at an open session within fourteen (14) days after receipt of such written notice from the City
and shall make a determination within seven (7) days after hearing by the City Commission whether or
not the action in question is a breach of the terms of this Agreement. The Collector agrees to be present
at such hearing and show cause why it has abandoned, delayed, refused, failed or neglected to comply
with the terms of the Agreement.
Should the Collector fail to appear at the hearing or fail to show cause why it had abandoned, delayed,
refused, failed or neglected to comply with the terms of the Agreement satisfactory to the City
Commission, the City Commission may declare a default of the Agreement and notify the Collector and
the surety that issued the performance and payment bond of such declaration of default, and the City
Commission may take such other action as it may deem advisable.
Upon receipt by the City of such declaration of default, the Collector agrees upon request of the City that
it will discontinue the work.
-12-
': l.~
(,
!
..'
".\..
4.6 Changes by City
The City in its sole discretion, may increase or decrease the level of service, add or delete required
services, or otherwise change the work required to be performed by the Collector. Under SUCR
conditions, the parties shall negotiate changes, if any, in the applicable rates brought about by SUCR
change in service. Such changes shall be incorporated by written amendment to this Agreement.
ARTICLE 5 -- BILLING AND ADMINISTRATION
The City will perform all billing for recycling. Each active residential utility account excluding multi-
family utility accounts will be billed a monthly recycling fee based upon the number of living units
available to be served in accordance with the Collector's bid figure. Multi-family utility accounts will
be billed based upon the level of service provided in accordance with the fee schedules for such recycling
service bid by the Collector. Billing is for services rendered subject to adjustments and prorations for
"ons" and "offs, " changes in level of service, errors, etc.
A utility fund will be established to account for recycling revenue and expenditures. The City will, on
or before the 15th of each month, pay the Collector an amount equal to the recycling amoUfU billedfor
the previous month subject to adjustments and prorations for "ons" and "offs," changes in level of
service, errors, write-offs, etc. The City will subtractfrom each monthly total due the Collector the base
billing and administration fee according to the following schedule:
"
,
,
!
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
$15,359
$15,800
$16,903
$17,329
$18,459
Additional charges for unique situations may be negotiated.
I
ARTICLE 6 -- STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE
The Collector, for the term of this Agreement, assures the City that said Collector will not on the
grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, handicap or marital status, discriminate in any
form or manner against said Collector's employees'or applicants for employment (as provided in Title VI
of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Florida Human Rights Act of 1977) and understands and agrees that
this Agreement is conditioned upon the veracity of this Statement of Assurance. Furthermore, the
Collector herein assures the City that said Collector will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 when federal grant(s) is/are involved. Other applicable federal and state laws, executive orders,
and regulations prohibiting discrimination as hereinabove referenced are included by this reference
thereto. This Statement of Assurance shall be interpreted to include Vietnam-era Veterans and Disabled
Veterans within its protective range of applicability.
-13-
'1 .. " ,..'!' < .;... ,>~
',. ,t"
" ;,;' ~.
, :,'
, . ~'. ,
'. .::...' , \ ~
'i '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed, in
duplicate, on the day first above written.
Countersigned :
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
By:
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Michael J. Wright
City Manager
M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
By:
Collector
City of Clearwater
Solid Waste Division
Attest:
-14-
Authorized Signature
. '. . ~ ,-
~' ~
.' '.
, t'. ",
.".; . ;.:' l~'
, .~.
, . i
\ I;,
.t\.TTACHMENT "AIf
CITY OF CLEARWATER
SOLID WASTE
",
,
f.
RECYCLING RATE SCHEDULE
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE COLLECTION SERVICE - MONTHLY
Service with 18-Gallon Bin
Once Weekly:
1994
1995
Rate per household per month
$1.99
$2.05
$3.98
Rate per household for back-door
pick up, non-medical
$4.10
Cost to Purchase 2nd &
subsequent containers including
loss due to negligence (cost plus
$1 handling)
Approx.
$4.00
Approx.
$4.10
Replacement Cost damaged or
missing container not due to
negligence
No
Charge
No
Charge
Cost to Purchase wheeled bin
toters (cost plus $1)
Approx.
$ 8.00
Approx.
$8.16
rateseh 1 .sem
\r...
.:
.
'. . -. ...' 1 ~" t \ . ~ '" \. ',. ..
, <-, .
1996
$2.12
$4.24
Approx.
$4.17
No
Charge
Approx.
$8.33
1997
$2.05
$4.10
Approx.
$4.22
No
Charge
Approx.
$8.50
1998
$1.99 '
$3.98
Approx.
$4.28
No',
Charge
Approx.
$8'.67
..
.,
.J'
(,
-"
~~~;
l r .!' .,. ,.'
"
"',,;; ,
"'.:.(' <
.c r ,'.,'.,."'-'
J,l' '
I', <:'
... '. ~ .. '.'::i
, : , .. .
":7:',. .
,
, 'JI, ~
,
I
)
CITY OF CLEARWATER SOLID WASTE
RECYCLING RATE SCHEDULE
MULTI-FAMILY COLLECTION SERVICE - MONTHLY
.
, ,
Service with '. ,
Semi-Automated . \~.., . '. ,I;
. . .... . .,.
Carts 1994 1995 1996 ,1997 1998
Cluster of
~ or 3
1 X Per Week $ 54.48 $ 56.00 $ 56.00 $ 56.00 $ 57.52
2 X 98.31 101.09 101.09 101.09 103.86
3 X 142.14 146.17 146. 17 146.17 150.20
4 X 196.64 202.18 202.18 202.18 207.73
5 X 264.04 271.42 271.42 271.42 278.80
6 X 397.88 408.74 408.74 408.74 419.60
Each Additional
Container ,over 5
1 X Per Week $ 7.00 $ 7.25 $ 7.25 $ 7.25 $ 7.50
2 X 14.00 14.50 14.50 14.50 15.00
3 X 21.00 21.75 21.75 21.75 22.50
'4 X 28.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 30.00
5 X 35.00 36.25 36.25 36.25 37.50
6 X ,42.00 43.50 43.50 43.50 45.00
Cluster of 4 or 5
1 X Per Week $ 61.48 $ 63.00 $ 63.00 $ 63.00 $ 64.52
2 X 112.31 115.09 115.09 115.09 117.86
3 X 163.14 167.17 167.17 167.17 171.20
4 X 224.64 230.18 230.18 230.18 235.73
5 X 299.04 306.42 306.42 306.42 313.80
6 X 439.88 450.74 450.74 450.74 461.60
NOTE:
Most large complexes will be served with two or more
clusters of five carts.
:1
".
rateschb.scm
" ','. " ','
~_ - ._"___,__ ~. _u.___ ______ a_
CITY OF CLEARWATER
SOLID WASTE
RECYCLING RATE SCHEDULE
MULTI-FAMILY COLLECTION SERVICE - MONTHLY
Service with
RECYCLING
Dumpster 19~ 1995 1996 1997 1998
2 Cubic Yard
1 X Per Week $ 44.02 $ 44.02 $ 44.02 $ 44.02 $ 44.02
2 X 80.42 80.42 80.42 80.42 80.42
3 X 118.82 118.82 118.82 118.82 118.82
4 X 160.85 160.85 160.85 160.85 160.85
5 X 214.12 214.12 214.12 214.12 214.12
6 X 314.97 314.97 314.97 314.97 314.97
3 Cubic Yard
1 X Per Week $ 56.95 $ 56.95 $ 56.95 $ 56.95 $ 56.95
2 X 104.05 104.05 104.05 104.05 104.05
3 X 151.15 151.15 151.15 151 . 15 ", 151.15
4 X 207.84 207.84 207.84 2 0 7. 8 ,~ 207.84
5 X 277.07 277.07 277.07 277.07 277.07
6 X 407.58 407.58 407.58 407.58 407.58
4 Cubic Yard
1 X Per Week $ 68.41 $68.41 $ 68.41 $ 68.41 $ 68.41
2 X 126.21 126.21 126.21 126.21 126.21
3 X 184.01 184.01 184.01 184.01 184.01
4 X 253.94 253.94 253.94 253.94 253.94
5 X 338.55 338.55 338.55 338.55 338.55
6 X 498.71 498.71 498.71 498.71 498.71
6 Cubic Yard
1 X Per Week $ 92.51 $ 92.51 $ 92.51 $ 92.51 $ 92.51
2 X 171.72 171.72 171.72 171.72 171.72
3 X 250.93 250.93 250.93 250.93 250.93
4 X 346.76 346.76 346.76 346.76 346.76
5 X 462.70 462.70 462.70 462.70 462.70
6 X 682.18 682.18 682.18 682.18 682.18
8 Cubic Yard
1 X Per Week 116.80 116.80 116.80 116.80 116.80
2 X 217.45 217.45 217.45 217.45 217.45
3 X 318.10 318.10 318.10 318.10 318.10
4 X 439.86 439.86 439.86 439.86 439.86
5 X 587.17 587.17 587.17 587.17 587.17
6 X 706.23 706.23 706.23 706.23 706.23
NOTE: If mUlti-family complexes are serviced with a dumpster,
the above rates will be the basis for billing. One "V-Bin"
cluster of four equates to one three cubic yard dumpster.
flltcschb.scm
'I
"
",1.
',t.
M
01
-
CO
-
01
co
E
...
o
'+-
o
...
0.
E
CO
...
en
o
...
0.
c
.2 en
CI) .5
'> u
.- >-
o CJ
Q) Q)
1;)0:00
co '-en
~13en
)or
:-2-.c
-U')c:n
0_::1
CJ)cbo
.. > '-
'- .- .c
!u.....
CO >-~
~=en
coEen
Q)cor
-'tj
().~
'+-"5
O:E
~
._ o?J
()'CO
.~
c
Q)
"'C
"(i)
Q)
0:
-
-
CO
,'-
Q)
>
o
00
0')
0')
~
"
0')
0')
~
<.0
0')
0')
~
10
0')
(1)
~
V
0')
0')
~
'- rn
co_
Q) CO
>-.....
o
101-
ATTACHMENT liB"
o
o
0')
..
(V)
o
(V)
..
r-
~
o
0')
r-
..
o
N
(V)
..
r-
~
o
<.0
00
..
r-
o
(V)
r-
~
LO
o
0')
..
00
(V)
r-
..
r-
~
0')
(V)
...s-
..
r-
OO
0')
~
...s-
O')
N
..
(0
...s-
O
..
c.o
~
-
r-
-
(I)
Q)
:J
C
Q)
>
Q)
a:
CO
....
o
I-
<.0
.....
10
'l;j-
~
"
M
M
M
(0
"
(0
'l;j-
o
10
(Y)
10
<.0
M
<.0
"
"
0')
10
00
(Y)
"
00
M
10
M
-
C\I
-
CI)
.....
CI)
o
U
0)
c:
',p
CO
'-
Q)
C-
O
q-
00
M
~
0')
00
10
OON
00')
NO
..
- -
O')N
N-
"
10
00
..
M
q-
<.0
ooN
q-O')
NO
..
10 to
"00
N_
<.0
10
M
..
00
q-
<.0
<.oN
MO')
qN
00.-
<.00
NN
C\I
V
-
~
OtO
Oq-
"10
..
C\I-
10 to
N.....
.-
q-
10
-
o
"
~
C\I
q-
q-
000
010
MOO
..
10.-
q-N
N.....
o
q-
q-
~
10
<.0
00
~
C\I
ON
0"
1000
..
N.-
Mo)
M"
.-
CI)
Q)
:J
C
Q)
>
Q)
a:
0)
c
'2
CO
E
Q)
a:
-~
M_
-CI)
CI).....
..... CI)
CI) 0
ou
u_
"OS
Q)'-
X C-
._ CO
u.u
rn
CI)
0)
..J
',\
" ,1
.'.:/ili:
, . ~ ;;
'It
to
o
,.....
,.....
r
"0
C
CO
(I)
Q)
(I)
C
Q)
C-
X
w
en
c
',p
CO
'-
Q)
C-
O
0-
"
r
Lt)
N
to
r
0-
to
N
o
en
,.....
....
..
(f)
\0-
Q)
..5:
(f) CO
~1: cD
..co (f)
~u c
0- Q)
>- (f) c.
0'" X
Q)~ w
a:~ "0"";
oE a~
JB:J CO ~
CO 0 Q) C
(f)'+- 0
o c~
g~ E~
~ ~ Q.e.
en .c 't: g
,~u Q) ._
"0'" 0..'-
Q):J a..
...0.. "O'+-
U.. C 0
(/) CO.....
~ Q) C e:
Z 'S 0 0)
(I)'" ',p E
2 (f)Q) ~ >-
c. 1;) :g,
(I) Q) '2 0)
0) 0) .- a:
e:~ E"O
CO "0 C
:::(9 <(CO
.c .
E ...; (/)0) "0 (/)
U e:.....
o Q)'- CO C
'- '- U 0)
'+- .- C en E
"'COQ)e:
Q) I 0):.= >-
~ . e: ::: CO
...... (/).- CO a..
COQ).....
Q5ue: ..0)
c'- 0 Q) (/)
Q)2:U>co
0) Q) ... ',p .c
(f) 0 CO U
(f) ,+-'" '-
Q) CO Q) 1;) a..:J
:J C > '2
c 0 ...._ 0)
~~~.5~
Q) Q) Q)<( .... 0)
a: 0.. a: ..J
E
u
'!
po
$
,as
>
o
';:.".\~j
":'1
.'.1
',. :1
j
j
J
, ',J,
0-
(0
en
to
U)
N
r
0-
('t)
'It
Lt)
Lt)
,.....
0-
to
U)
o
'j
:1
r
'It
,.....
0-
rn
Q)
:J
C
Q)
>
Q)
a:
....
Q)
Z
--
r-C\I
--
M~
--
, "
': .
,', I
",
. ,
, J
,i
('W) "
0) .J
- I
co !
- ,
0) "
<.1
,I
"
co
E
...
o
'too
c e
o a..
:!a E
.~ CO
ct;,
Q) 0
1nctco
C'O en en
~.= ~
-013
= >o.c
o CJ en
en Q) :::s
- a: e
~....c
~CO'"
C'OQ)~
~>-en
C'OiDen
Q)_r-
- I
o Q)
.... .2:
ou.
.~:g
o c
Q)
"'0
'in
Q)
a:
00
C)
C)
.-
I"-
C)
C)
.-
to
C)
C)
.-
L!)
C)
0')
.-
.q-
C)
0')
.-
'- CI)
co_
O) CO
>-....
o
101-
o
o
r-
,
r-
0')
I"-
.(J).
o
0')
(Y)
,
r-
o
ex)
.(J).
o
c.o
0')
,
o
N
CO
.(J).
o
o
c.o
r-
0')
I"-
.(J).
o
N
N
r-
I.!)
I"-
.(J).
o
l"-
N
,
c.o
I.!)
0')
,
(Y)
.(J).
v
(V)
V
V
LO
LO
t"-
(V)
o
LO
N
LO
N
(V)
~
LO
en
V
(X)
en
N
t"-
(0
V
(X)
t"-
LO
(V)
V
V
en
t"-
V
LO
(X)
V
N
to
to
to
-
to
(Y')
~
<.00
000
<.Ow
..
000')
00
r- yo-
o
CO
('t')
CO
<r-
-0
....
CO
....
('t')
...,.
-0
...,.
o
CO
LD
...,.
-0
C\I
LD
<r-
<0
C\I
(Y')
LO
(Y')
,
to
J".
~
<.00
<.00
mw
..
NO')
ON
r- yo-
-0
LD
...,.
LD
CO
('t')
-0
CO
<0
<0
N
....
<r-
-0
"
,
.'
..
CI)
Q) CI)
::::J CI) +oJ , "~"""'"
CI)
c: ..... 0 ""I
rJ) Q) CI) , ~ :,
CI) ..... > 0 U ,;,,;
Q) rJ) Q) U rJ) ,','W
::::l 0 a: CO Q)
C () "'C +oJ ::J ' "I
Q) '0. .,r,
C) 0) c: "I
:> C) c: X CO Q) " :;"J
Q) c: "2 u: u > l
cr: 'p Q)
cc CO . . 0:: ~ '1
CO \0- E CI)
+oJ Q) CI) .....
0 c. Q) 0) Q) "
I- 0 a: ..J Z ~
co
~
CO
..
L!)
""'
(Y')
oq-O
NO
00""'
..
"'''I
<.0 yo-
..- yo-
~
o
(Y)
..
.q-
~
(Y')
00
100
m,,",
..
"'0
LOoq-
r- yo-
~
.q-
to
..
l"-
e
(Y')
NLO
"'''"'
('1)1"-
..
('I)L!)
10 yo-
..- yo-
.....
CJ)
J".
,
e
J".
.q-
..
OOLO
m,,",
"'(Y')
..
01"-
mo
<.Ow
.-
LO 0 0 ~ COr-- 0 0\0 0\0 g6g~ ~ 0 ~ LO 0 ro-
CO 0 0 ~ O~ to COM 0\0 0 0'1 " 0 0 CO
l"- t' 0 0 I' lOO ~ ~~ lOO\ O'\c\O \0 ~ " 0'1 ro-
0\ .. ... .. ... ... ... ... ... -. ... N ...
0\ CO M M M \Din M 0'10 N o 0'10\ r0- m n
~ " 0 N M N lON M MM 0 N ON an ~ lO
0\ M M in rot ~" ?"- M \0
...... Vi' I Vi' >(/)-
ee
......
0\
'-tS ~ ooQ' 0 0 lO MN 0 O~ 0.., 1000 \D 0 \D N 0 ~
\0 0 0 1.0 O~ 0 ~CO ON 0000 an 0 an M \0 0
~ N 0 0 \0 Nrt r-l O~ lOtO I\.OI.ON " CO M M CO
0\ >4\0 .. .. ... ... ... ... .. -. N ...
~...... 0\ LO M M M Nin N COt' r-- NO'IN an \0 oq<
00 ~~ CO N M N 100\ M Mm \0 0" I"- oq< t'
.,-i N N r-l .., rot r-l" ?"- M \0
W...... ra {J} I >(/)- >(/)-
.,-i r--
>0 r.:l
.,-i ~
O'tJ
Q) t>
Q) U) .qt 0 0 lO mco 0 \Ooq< 00 0000 eo 0 to lO 0 N
+J .... CO 0 0 co NO'\ lO M\O OLO 0000 .., 0 .., 0 0 an
W ~ LO rl 0 0 lO lON 0 moq< lOO\ O\OI.ON ~ t' to- ~ rot
ro Q) 0\ .. ... .. ... ... ... ... ... -. ... N ...
3:~ 0\ 1O t' M M cor-- ..... \Om to- IOlOO\O an 0'1 .....
rot \0 M M N ~\D M MCO LO N 0'11II' \0 M lO
"CSI N M .., " ri.... r-- M \0
.,-i Vi' 1 >(/)- >(/)-
.-t>t
O~
enrd
~; N 0 0 tn riCO 0 \0\0 ON ILOOIn LO 0 LO 0'1 0 an
t' 0 0 10 lOr-- 0 tnM or-- ONON to- O to- m N ~
Q)C/) .., N 0 0 0 NIIl 0 COO tnM 'M\Dto- \0 oq< N 0 CO an
,+J 0\ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... -. ... rl ...
ro+J 0\ t' tn M M 1O('t) 0 tnI' M \.00\ In N CO N
~ ~ rt ooQ' M ..... N ~.., M MCO LO 0.... " M M
N M .., .... ri.... to- M \0
roC/) "CJ)o 1 >(/)- >(/)-
Q)......
.-tQ)
U"CS
.,-i
~Ul
0..0 ""
~ ~ I&l
>t::; 0\0 ~
4JU M Otll
.,-i :El1i1
U.-t co 4J (.) I&l~
rd Ul .....l'Il ~ ~ 0 tIl U) Ii1
.,-i ~ o~ 0 00 0 0 ~ ~ ~ Ul ~Eot
+J Q) ~ ~ 0 C'I H
~ ~ Oe.. 0\0 0 ~ ... E-4 E-4 0 ~ ~ra
Q) .,-i +JO 0 ~ ::; M 0 0 E-4 .,-i
'tS (tj ... Q) e.. ..... en ID- E-4 E-4 M ~
.,-i +J +J 0 ...~ ~~ p:a ~ ~ tIl 0 .-t fa~
Ul 0 lJl ~ -,-i 'dOO ~ . b 0 Ii1 0 .,-i
Q) Q) Q) 0 'tSlJll'll Q).......... Q) Q) tIl &<:I U) ~ ~ 0 ..0 E-t1i1
~ tIl ~ .,-i U ro ~ +J+J+J J:l Ul U) lJl ~ Ul ... C)
E-t . r-i 0 ......... ~ .,-i ro (tj I'd 0 ~N E-tr-l +> tIl Q) E-4 CO ~ aa
S=tIlO ~ Ul ro l'JJ~~~ +J Q)...... Ulctl l:: E-t +J.-t H n 0
00. Q) ~ I ~ E-tO+J+J Ul ~M o ~N Q) tIl ..... ..0 ~ MUlJ..l
.... tJ I 0'\ Q) Q) l'JJ~UlUl ::; tJ ..... ...... ~ 0 'Oro C'I~ 1ilE-t
+J ~ +J WP:: o t:4 ......r-! ~ U rx.1'O On (.) Q)r-l Ii1 ~~
~ t!J W .r-i Ul Q) C) ~~O Q) ~ ~ ro J..It) ~ o .,-i '0 tIl-
.... :zt Q) +J ~ m ... I .r-!.r-!.r-! ~ 'tS+J ..... ~ At ~ U~ MQ) Iill
""'HO Ul ~ 9 ~ m Q ~,a+J+J ~ rd E-t~ro U r4 mM+J ~-
o E-t .r-i Q) 0 Q) Q) ra:I Q) rd.r-! o ~ HPlOQ) 'OQ) Q).,-i ro
U) ~ :> 0 U Q ~~ ~>~~t).-t ~o P. ..:l lJl 0 Q)P:4 E-t C'I.o J..I t~
CD ~ .,-i H .,-i ::s .,-i J..I ~~ ro E-t +J li1 ~ Q)
QIilQ) > ~ ~ 1J::l~ Ji4+JQ)'O'O+J Q)AI oOS::.d I'd~ :zt ro-~
Pot en ~ 0 0 ~ ro+J~~P t) o 0 ~o ,dNQ) ~..:a
0 Q) ~ 0'\::$ J..IUlI'd ~ ~ +J ~ 0 UnC'l
.-t 00 Q) s::C/) 4Jro ctl ::; s:: +J ::; J..I Q) ><
ro Q) U) -,-i Ul~C'I. · e~ Q)lJl~ Alr-l >to Q)
~ Q) ~ ctl +J ... .,-i ~ M N O~ ~~Q) cd .-to::s ~
0 C'I .d roC/) ~ '0 .,-i 0000 ,dtO~
lJl ct:J Q) 0 ~H .,-i .r-! .-t ~ C'd Q) l/l Ul +J ...Q) 1
~ J..I lJl ~ Q)U .a r-l r-l ~ J..I CI +J ro Ul Q) ~\O>
Q) C'd Q) ::s ~ o.,-i Q) Q) <ll s:: Q) Q),d ONQ)
~ l!) p:: Pl 0 ~oo~ ~~ ~HH H+J ~ ....... p::
0'1 0 0 0 1O.., 0 \00 0\0 I I 00 0 0 0 0'1 0
0 0 0 lO r--~ 1O lOCO oeo 0000 N co .., 0'1 N
eo 0 0 0 co 1O.., M Moq< to \0 I 1\0\0 ro- N .., . co
0\ .. ... .. ... ... ... ... -. ... rl ...
0\ M \0 M M o. oq< OM eo 0'10\ N CO N
" M N M N \Din M oq<M 0 00 I"- III M
M M in " ~" ?"- M \0
<l)- I <l)- >(/)-
::. ~j
" """
, " . ~ . .." .' . -.. ' ,
,., ,"
rJ)
Q) rJ)
:J rJ) +-'
C:. +-' rJ)
rJ) Q) rJ) 0
rJ) +-' > 0 u
Q) rJ) u_ rJ)
:J 0 Q)
a: -ca Q)
c: U :J
Q) C) Q)'- c:
> C) c: x c. Q)
Q) c: ._ CO
'2 u.u >
a: ',p Q)
co co . - a:
co '- E rJ)
+-' Q) rJ) +-'
0 C. Q) Q) Q)
l- 0 a: ...J Z
'''. ,'...
" ~, ~ >
;.,'
M
en
-
co
-
en
to
0)
0)
T-
o
o
co
..
N
""""
LO
N
co
o
o
<.D
""""
-0
......
0)
0)
T-
o
o
co
..
co
-
LO
""""
LO
.....
<.D
0)
N
C'O
E
'-
o
....
o
c '-
oQ.
'iii E
-:; ctl
-- ...
CO)
Q) e
'ti)Q.co
ctl C) en
~:5~
"0 u
-- >-.c
-uc::n
o CD :s
UJa:o
.. ...
.......c
SC'O'tJ
ctlCD~
!>en
ctlLOcn
Q)-~
,I
- CD
(.) >
~:.-
'0 U.
-0
o
o
0)
..
o
co
~
N
......
(V)
to
LO
.-
<.D
0)
0)
T-
-0
LO
o
(V)
..
......
~
(V)
LO
<.D
~
o
(V)
.-
LO
0)
0)
.....
-0
o
<.D
""""
0)
""""
N
..
o
('t)
N
-0
~
0)
m
.....
LO
0)
~
N
q
o
0)
q
N
-0
LO
......
('t)
LO
m
<.D
'- rJ)
co_
Q) ctl
>-+oJ
,. ,,0
LOl-
co
.....
......
..
N
LO
(V)
NN
Nm
LO~
..
N .....
co""""
.....
;',
l'.i.
"
:,
~
o
LO
..
......
<.D
(V)
NN
com
N~
..
N<.o
,....LO
.....
'.
)
).:~
co
N
LO
..
N
N
(V)
NN
-m
NO
..
om
oco
-
~
o
,.....
co
LO
....
o
~
co
..
<.D
.....
N
0<.0
LO~
,....(V)
..
~.....
mN
-0
o
('t)
......
co
M
....
-0
lit
N
N
M
M
....
-0
~
......
o
o
....
-0
co
en
en
to
M
-0
o
o
lI:t
co
to
LO
-0
:"~!.):;:
" ,L
. !~i;:':'
m
LO
o
..
LO
('t)
.....
<0 LOI
('t)N
m-
..
-<0
m
m
V
<.D
~
m
('t)
..
N,....
O~
,....LO
..
-~
~co
<0-
..-
" ,,;,.
~
~
a
0\ 0 0 ~ E'N 0 IN ON I INN \.D 0 \D 0 0
qt M 0 co MCO LO 01' ON 000'\0\ 0\ 0 0'1 LO 0
co E' ~ 0 QI qto M 1\0 LOin I Iqt'llll' 0 0 0 U') co
0\ " .. .. ... .. " , " ..
0\ 0 co \D ~ COO qo E' N r-i.... ~ I' Ln
.... 0 N MID M qt eo r-i.... In '" M
.-t .-t .-t ... C'I'l I QI
{J}
{I)-
0\ 0 0 I' OlD 0 IN ON OINN 0 0 0 0 0 0
co 0 0 r-l O'ICJ\ LO OM oeo 000'\0\ l' 0 l' U') 0 (l')
l' M ~ 0 QI ON rl 1\0 LON Olqo'llll' 0 0 0 U') co l'
0\ " .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. ...
0\ M co \D ~ E'.-t M co N 1.0 r-i\D 0 M Ln
.-t 0\ N Mill M n I"- qt rllll co 0 .-I
.... r-I ... C'I'l rl QI
{l)- I {J)o
M
~~ 0\ 0 0 ("'\J r-iN 0 IN ON OONN ID 0 \D 0 0 ..,
0 0 0 M nr- 0 Or-l 0'" 00"'0\ " 0 " 0 0 N
S::~~\D to ~ 0 \.0 COM rl 1\0 LON o\Oqoo \D '" " U') 0 N
00'1>40\ .. .. ... .. .... .. ... ... .. ...
-,..j 0\ \0 r--- \D ("'\J LOCO N I' 0 lONrlO'l l' N co
oo~~'" CO C'\l ("'\J r-illl M \0 0 E' .-I co ~ 0 I'
-,..j .... ... (t) rl M
_~ M ~ {l)- I {J)o
o ~~
Q)O~
+JNO \0 0 0 l.C) ..rill 0 10 00 001.O\D .... Ln \D 0 0 'lit
00........ In 0'1 ~ 0 ("'. OlD LO 00 o III Ooqo'llll' ID N M M co 'lit
res" CJ\ to C"'l 0 '<;j< O.q. 0 IN 1.01"- O\OI'M III co " M ....r "
~'tS 0\ .. .. .... ... .. ... " ... ... .. ...
t'('jQ) ... to \D \0 0 NO rl M ~ OtOLn...t \D I' (J)
m \0 N ("'\J r-iM M 1.0 CJ\ r-I ('I "" 0'\ ....r
-,..j rot .... N I C'\l
......' <J)- {.J)-
o >
U)GJ
~
... I
~
Q) , oq< 0 0 0 \00 0 11.0 OlD ItOlUl .... 0 .... 0 (J) co
+J:>" "" \0 co 0 M COlD 0 OM Ottl ONO('l N 0 ('II ?""- M CJ\
res ~ CJ\ oq< M 0 \D \0.... 0 Ioq< I.OCJ\ Ir-il...t N co ~ r-i ....r CJ\
~ ea CJ\ .. " .. .. .. .. ... ... ..
res ; .... I' -q< \0 co Will 0 r-l ... \D \D ('tl ~ ltl
oq< .-l rl Q\ M \D 0\ CJ\ 0 N
Q)U) .... M M
r-I V>- I <A-
CJ:>.. ,.
r-I
4-1 -M ........
o a rQ
>tea ~ ~
+J4-l 0\0 ~
.,..j I M ~ :f::
CJ -M . UJ
-iJ co ~ C) rQ~
r-I m r-iUl 4-1 J..l 0 Ul tIl ~ m ~g;
~ ).j .~ 0 t. 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 00 t)l
~ Cll J...l ~ 0 ~ ~ OE-4
~ UE-t 0\0 0 ~ .. 0 Q) 'M E-4H
'M ~o 0 ~ ~ .-l 0 0 E-4 +J r-I alia
ea ... (1) E-t ri CJ) iJ)- E-I EoI S tI.l ......
~ +J 0 ~ ~ s:: ~ ~ 0 Ul P. .,-4 rQ~
0 lJl s:: -M ...l:J "el 0 0 J..l P P J..4 fJ) ~ S ..Q E-4~
(1) Q) 0 "dUltT.l Q)-M -,..j (1) Q) tI1 ~ tIl ~Cll ~ ::s OH
UlJ..4 'M c::J cdJ..l ~+J +l a {/) rJl 00 rl re a rQ ~.
E-t'M U ......... ~-,.-i I'J1ltlltl ltl 0 S::N E-Ir-I +J +J.Q E-4 0 a!
=1110 ~ {/) cO E-4J...lJ...l ~ +J Q)....... rJlCfS s:: Ul .,...j ea H ~ ~
00 Q) $..l I ~ 1'J10+J +l Ul ~M o o..N Q) E-4 "el""" ~ 0 4-l
.... U I b'I Cll (1) O~fJ) Ul ~ o .M ....... ~ Ul Q) 0
4.J ~ +J U)p:i CJ o..-M . r-t s:: CJ ~ro Or-l 0 ~:>.. ~ 00 '0 UlE-4
~ t!J Ul 'M {/) Q) J:: S::O Q) ~~ ro 0 CJO P. ~ Cll 1&1-
.... ~ Q) ~ ~ U) ... Q I -M .,..j'M >t '04J '.,...j ~ Pol Cll M Q) -iJ ~!,
J.4HO (/J ~ 3 J::Ul =Q)'s S~+J s:: ItS E-I~cO ~ "el~ ~ +l ro
o E-t 'M OJ 0 Q) Q) re CfS.r-i o J...l H~OQ) Q) Ul ~ E~
m;> 0 u 0 ~~ H>IC( IC(Ur-I ~ 0 ~ HOO E-t +J ~' E-4 ::s Q)
Q) ~ -,..j ~.M ::s.,.-i J...l ~Ij...f ro 0 ro 0 ~ r-IQ) s::
a Q) > ~ ~ ~~ +JQ) re'O+J Q)P-4 oo,::.c: E-t ~ :z; 00 Cll ~~
p..CJ) ~ 0 0 ~ ea+J S::~::> 0 00 o Cll .M tJ"l
0 OJ ~ ~~ J...l fJ} ItS s:: S +J ~ ~.-I 4-1>
r-l Ul Q) S::CI.l 4J1tS ro ::s ~~::s ~ro O~ l/)
Cd Q) l/) .,..j tI.l~ trI. t ~~ Q)UlPol CIl Q) Cll
,:: OJ :> ro 4J ... -,-4 S::.-IN ~~Q) ~Ul ::s
0 t1' ~ .d ItSCI.l S::"d .,..j .. Cll Q) ~
Ul ro (1) 0 J...lH -M -,-4 r-I C4-f rotJJoo fJ).d ~-~ Q)
~ ~ Ul )..j Q)CJ ar-l r-I $..l J...l ~+J res fJ)+J >
Q) ro '(1) ~ ~ reo .,..j Q) Q) Q)~Q) Q) 8!
~ ~ p:i tll 0 IC(CIl r:o p.P-4 p:iHH H Z
,,\ '
, ....
0 I' CO 1O 0 0 00 000 00 OlOtO 0 0 0
COLn N In .qo I' CO COO 000 00 Lnl'-N Ln to III
In 1.0 1.0 M 1O M N NO 100Ln lOCO I'COCO 1.0 I' \D
In .. .. ... ... ... .. .. .. .. ... ... ..
MN M 'I:;ft 0\ I' COr-- 1'01' MI.O MMN qt In
N to I I 1.0 III 0\ CO tOM CO LnMM
M I I ... r-i
ih (I}- <(f)-
, :::i
" ", .,' ",
-_._--~--~
. ,....
""'<.
~ :-
, ~'~L'_~:...c~
,>
;'\:
"
~. .~
" ,
N
- 00 0 0 0 It)
0 g;l 00 0 0 It) I'
.... L.'10 ltl CO I' CO
-0) ,,0' M to M M
Qj 0.-
CI COlt) CO It)
III ClJ <It
Q. iii
(J) 00 0 0
ClJ 1" 0 It)
00 0 0 It) I'
':::0) It)0 It) "t M
"'0) 1'. O' M to N
E'- .-
0 CO It) CO It)
'- <It
...
III ~I 00 0 0 0 It)
ClJ
::l 00 0 0 0 I'
c It)0 It) o;!' It) CO
ClJ ,,0' M It) 1'. 0
>
ClJ COlt) CO o;!'
a: <It
III
III It)1 It)0 0 0 0 It)
eO) NO 0 0 It) I'
l?~ Wlt) It) I' "t CO
'0 tOm M o;!" ... cD
ClJ COo;!' CO o:t
-
c.; <It
ClJ o:tl
)(0) ltlO 0 0 0 0
w~ 1'0 0 0 0 0
COlt) It) It) 0 0
-iro M o' U'i U'i
COo;!' CO M
<It
CO
III 0)
Q) I
u(O
.- 0)
!to)
-.-
Q)
~ It)1
roo)
:2:0)
'0'"
Q)
...
.~ o:tl
00)
'-0)
0.....
M
~
!:e
en
-a
ClJ
-
ro
-a
!z ~
W III
~ :E
Ii: ro
ct U
Q. ~
~ c: ClJ
oa:
tI) 'iij >
~ ':; :::
a: .- E
OOl'll
>GI:!
:>...-
u::l"3
;:j?;:E
co"tl~
::) .-
o.ojij
ci~-':
wC.c
I-:J~
ct 0,-
?;t'5~
a:1Ila:
ct .!!! '0
W .t:
~~!:'!
....::)-=
LI. ro
o (/)
III
~ 8
- ..
u 0
"'a
ClJ
...
U
ClJ
Q.
)(
W
;1
'0 (01
III 0)
ClJO)
...
ro
c
c
~ Lnl
'00)
QlO)
... ...
U
Ql
e o:tl
0..0)
0)
...
II
..
l'lI
ClJ
>
ClJ
>
u:
-
:c
o
E
E
o
u
00010
Olt)l.OO
CONO)O
M U'i
00010
Olt)l.OO
CONO)O
M U'i
00010
Olt)l.OO
CONO)O
M U'i
00010
OltlOlt)
CONmO)
M -i
00010
It)lt)l.Oll)
I'NCOCO
M o:t-
,.. ~
.- ClJ E
c "C .... l'lI
Ql 'w '0 '";" III
:E ..0 Q.',j iij
l/l'-O"3-
~8Ci:E~
"C
ClJ
is
co
-
o
Z
~
"C
ClJ
is
co
.
..
Ql
00
00
u-lO
MN
o
o
o
It)
o It) Olll)
o:t...Oll)
.... o:tll)
0lt)~1l'),
M...lt)en
... o:t
o It) olll')
N...OM
... Mo:t
~~gl~
... ;'1 N
o It) It)1 0
o...coo
... N
~
~ ClJ 'E
c-a:t:1ll
Ql 'w 0 "i l/l
:E ..0 Q.'~ jij
l/l:SO-S-
~uo:E~
c
~
o
..
Oil
III
III
III
(3
':t
':f
, -...~
o
q
Il')
N
<1)0
o
q
It)
M
o
o
o
o
I'
o
q
It)
N
<1)0
o
q
Il')
N
<1)0
00
00
u-lO
MN
o
o
u-l
M
o
o
o
It)
o
o
o
o
I'
00
00
u-lO
MN
o
o
o
o
I'
o
o
o
It)
o
q
It)
M
00
00
It) ll)
NN
o 0 """I o:t
O......N
.... ...
o 0 ltllln
OIl')NI'
ll) It)q
...
o
o
...
00
00
It) ll)
NN
o
o
OOMIM
O........N
.... .-
1t)00lll')
""'ll)ON
""" ltlq
....
00
00
It)ll)
NN
o
o
...
OONIN
O.......N
.... ...
00010
It)ll)lt)lt)
o:t o:ten
It)LO
1'1'
o:to:t
NN
o
o
...
o 0 "'1'"
O......N
..... ...
It) 0 Ollt)
NLOltlN
o:t MCO
LOLO
NN
o:to:t
NN
o
o
...
LO 0 Olll)
en............
...
00010
OLOltlO
o:t NI'
....
-
o
Q.
o
"-
o
~
~ Ql 'E
c"O....1ll
Ql 'w '0 '";" III
:E ..0 c.',j iij
l/l'-O"3'"
~8o~~
~
~ ClJ 'E
c "0 :t: III
ClJ'jjj 0 "i III
:E..o Q.'~ is
1Il'-0"3'"
~8o:E~
'C
ClJ
iij
'Cco
~ 0
ti3z
*<ft
00
ltllt)
"'a
ClJ
is
co
-c
"-
III
o
..0
"'a
"-
III
U
III
C
l'lI
U
E
::I
c
'E
::I
ct
..
III
ClJ
U
en
III
III
(3
~
..
I
t
.
';" ,
'j, ,,(-,'
. '
N
:;I
N
41
Cl
ell
0..
('I)
en
CO
-
en
"0
Q)
...
<<:I
"0
C.
I- ::>
Z \I)
W Q)
:1E j5
t: ~
c( >-
0.. u
W C a:1I)
C 0
lI)'iij ~
:W::'- .-
a:'~ E
oc~
:= ~.:-
ult)'S
::;~~
~;g0/S
o..'Oni
. VJ ''::
a:-C
W a. IS)
I-g:g
c(,-\I)
~~~
a:1t)...
~ .~ 0
-,E:~
u5ni
u. (f)
o \I)
~ e
- ~
u "0
II)
...
u
II)
c.
)(
UJ
'-
co
II)
~
'Q)
>
u:
~!
-,~l
01
41
n;
~ ,....,
.cen
_en
E-
e
-
I/)
~ ~I
>
Q.l
a:
I/)
e ~I
(:icn
"0....
Q.l
l)
Jml
co
~q1
U!D
.t: en
0.. en
... ....
41
i ~I
'C
41
-
U
. '<1'1
Oen
0:: en
-
ml
I/)
~I
~I
i ~I
U
ll.l
o
...
0.. ~I
JI
:c
o
E
E
o
u
o ll) Olll)
"<t-Oll)
~ (OCO
o ll) Olll)
M-IOO')
~ 10"
o ll) 101 0
~-NIO
~ lO"
o U') lOl 0
...-....NLO
~ Mll)
o ll) lOl 0
O-N'l:t
~ N'l:t
~
] -
... C1)'E
~:E:::: ~ III
:'2 ~ &..; iij
lIl'-O'S'"
~8o::iE~
c
CIl
CIl
~
I
III
III
III
6
10
N
::0
N
Lt'l
N
0')
.-
... ,
o
U')
N
-
-
o
10
N
cO
o
o
(0
cO
o
~
U')
-
o
~
ll)
o
~
U')
-
o ,.... COIIl)
C"l Mil)
... -
o ,.... COIIl)
... Mil)
... -
o LO U'll 0
o M'<t
... -
LO LO ""'I '<t
,.... M-
-
o LO NI""
LO MOO
i6 ~
'f;: CIl 'E
C "tJ ... 111
Q) .Ui '0 ... en
:E .D c.';:;-
III ... O:i ~
~8c::iE~
.
"tJ
OJ
i6
a:l
,
III
C
III
(.)
'ii
OJ
en
o
U')
to
<::T
o
en
en
M
~I
~1
~j
~j
~j ;~
~ ;1
01
101
(OJ
Ni
NJ
(")1
01
01
~
o
C
1..0
to
'<:t
o
o
N
'<t'
;
~I
o
CO
'<t
M
o
o
ci
M
o
o
o
Ln
o
~
Il)
M
o
o
d
Ln
o
o
ci
'<t
o
o
d
Ln
~ Ln1el ~~
~ U'll ~I ~~
~ lOl ~I ~~
~ lOl ~I ~~
~ lOl ~I ~~
Iii
'::; Q)
~:g:t::
'C \I) 0 CIl
.- .0 C. CO
en ... 0 ...,
Q.l ;:, ... 0
a:UOI-
\I)
ni
-
o
I-
~
Q.l
>
o
~I
"
;.>
,;
'~..,{..('
,"
:'\i
>~
;.:?:
" :':';"/~~
:,i:T'
" ;;~::~J
, -::)
" ~
, ,'.Ii
:..~.',',;
-,'<
.
. ,: ~'.
',' >:\
,~'J
ui
:9
o
'<t
N
N
.c
01
'ii)
~
.c
U
:c
~
\I)
c:
o
-
.
\I)
\I)
e
01
.
-
c:
Q)
\I)
Q)
...
c.
Q)
...
\I)
-
c:
;:,
o
E
111
II)
01
111
c:
c:
~
.
4
'i
!
. ;'.".;(..-"': >
CLEARWATER RECYCLING PROGRAM
STRATEGIC PLAN
Mission
To provide a cost-effective full-service citywide recycling program for
Clearwater which includes residential curbside/curbsort collection, multi-family
collection tailored to each complex and the processing and marketing of recyclables
to optimize profits and return maximum revenue to the program to offset operating
costs.
Executive Summary
The City of Clearwater Solid Waste Division herein referred to as CSW plans to
provide the citizens of Clearwater with a full-service recycling program which includes
residential, curbside/curbsort recycling to approximately 26,500 homes all of which
will be billed the monthly fee, multi-family collection service to a minimum of 230
complexes (approximately 20,000 living units) and the processing and marketing of
recyclables.
Processing and marketing of recyclables will be accomplished by CSW at the
new complex at 1701 N. Hercules Avenue. There recyclables will be sorted and
prepared for market. Marketing will be a dynamic process to optimize profits. Spot
marketing of recyclables will be used to take advantage of opportunities to increase
profit. Neighboring municipalities will be invited to let us market their recyclables to
increase volume for better prices. Revenue from the marketing of recyclables will be
returned to the recycling program to offset operating costs and keep prices down for
the citizens in the long term.
A multi-material drop-off center will be operateq at the Solid Waste Complex
free of charge. The drop-off center will serve citizens not yet participating in existing
programs. It will also provide a means to recycle cardboard and office paper which
.'\ ~ <
;"
<,
1
I
I
'"
"
.'.'.
"
".
will not be included in residential collection.
CLEARWATER RECYCLING PROGRAM
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND GOALS
CONCEPT
The City of Clearwater Solid Waste Division hereinafter referred to as CSW
plans to provide a full-service citywide recycling program for Clearwater. The program
will consist of residential, curbside/curbsort recycling collection for all single-family
residences all of which will be billed the monthly fee, multi-farnily recycling service for
a minimum of 230 complexes (approximately 20,000 homes) phased in over a three-
year period, the operation of a multi-material drop-off center and the processing and
marketing of recyclables for the purpose of returning the income therefrom to the
recycling program. This revenue will be used to offset operating costs and provide
recycling service to Clearwater citizens at the lowest possible rate in the long term.
'1
RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING
PROGRAM
Description
CSW will serve all of the single family residences in Clearwater with once-a-
week curbside collection of newspaper, aluminum and steel cans, three colors of glass
food and beverage containers, plastic milk/water jugs, and plastic soda bottles. If
unacceptable materials are found in the container, CSW will leave an explanatory note
and the material with the container. Any acceptable material left at the curb on the
scheduled collection day or alongside the container will also be picked up. CSW will
provide "back door" recycling collection service to qualified residents (qualified being
a letter from the resident's doctor indicating a medical need for this service on the
part of their patients) at no additional charge. This service will also be provided on
request to non-medically qualified residents at a cost of double the standard recycling
rate. Replacement of damaged or missing containers, not due to abuse, will be
,
, ~
I
.1
j
1
j
""I
"
I
:1
i
,::'1
;
,
2
, . $ " . ....... .' '. , . .
. ,. ." ~
"
"
t."""",
provided at no cost to the resident. Commencing March 21, 1994, CSW will provide
one 18-gallon yellow recycling container, stamped with the recycling logo to each
household with full explanatory information. Included in this information will be
notification of first and subsequent collection days, what materials are accepted, and
a magnet stating the household's collection day. Additional containers as well as
wheeled bin toters may be purchased from CSW at cost plus a $1.00 handling charge.
Bar code scanner systems or other electronic devices will be used to collect necessary
data to effectively monitor the program. Data will also be used for reporting to City
Management, the City Commission and the state, and to target areas that will need
more intense educational and/or promotional effort to bolster program participation.
Collection of recyclables will be accomplished by using seven (7) customized recycling
vehicles on seven (7) routes (to be established by CSW staff), five days per week,
with an average of 757 passbys per route/per day. Two (2) additional recycling
vehicles will be used as backup.
Goals
To provide curbside recycling collection to 26,500 customers in Clearwater.
Measure: 26,500 residential customers billed
To operate the residential recycling program within five percent (5%) of the
approved proforma.
Measure: Recycling Proforma
To achieve an average participation rate of 50 percent citywide.
Measure: Annual recycling report. Participation is defined in the
State Recycling Manual as one customer placing their bin
out for collection once each month. The industry standard
for a successful program is a 50 percent (50%)
participation rate.
'!
;.f
j
.,.'1
:1
'"/
,,'
;. ,
3
I
I
I
,
, 'i'~
MULTI-FAMILY RECYCLING
PROGRAM
Description
The Multi-Family Recycling Program will be designed to serve a minimum of
230 complexes (20,000 living units) phased in over a three-year period. CSW plans
to provide individual programs tailored to meet the needs of each complex based upon
the physical layout of the complex and the desires of the residents. Initially, an
analysis of the distribution of complexes, their location and respective number of units
will be conducted. When this is completed, representatives of CSW will meet with
each complex manager, superintendent or contact person to determine, on a case-by-
case basis, the needs of each complex. A customized program will be developed for
each complex. Every complex will be offered the opportunity to recycle newspaper,
three colors of glass food and beverage containers, aluminum and steel cans. These
materials will be collected using SO-gallon semi-automated carts and/or dumpsters
according to the needs of the complex. It has been determined that in 1994, one
semi-automated collection vehicle would be used on one route five days per week.
By mid 1995, through the remainder of the contract, two semi-automated collection
vehicles will be employed on two routes, with 23 stops per day per route. This would
allow expansion of the multi-family program if it is determined that more than 230
complexes could be served.
Goals
To provide customized recycling collection to 230 complexes by the end of
calendar year 1996.
Measure:
100 Complexes served by December 31, 1994
165 Complexes served by December 31, 1995
230 Complexes served by December 31, 1996
;,
4
.., ;";
.......
MULTI-MATERIAL DROP-OFF CENTER
Description
CSW will provide and service one (1) multi-material drop-off center located at
1701 N. Hercules Avenue. Separate containers will be supplied for the collection of
newspaper, aluminum cans, steel cans, corrugated cardboard, plastic milk/water jugs,
plastic soda bottles, separated three colors of glass food and beverage containers and
office paper (white and computer). All containers will be labeled with CSW's
recycling logo, telephone number and appropriate signage to clearly indicate the
material to be collected. An explanatory sign will be placed at the center giving
complete instructions for use of the center. CSW will provide, and service at no
charge, clearly labeled containers for non-recyclable trash. This center will be
monitored and serviced seven (7) days a week. The multi-material drop-off center will
also provide free mulch to citizens. Mulch provided will be from the Pinellas County
mulch site. Resupply of mulch will be back-hauled by CSW vehicles returning from
County mulch site. In the event that the drop-off center site at 1701 N. Hercules
Avenue, which is being constructed as part of the new Solid Waste Complex, is not
ready, an interim drop-off center will be established at the City Players site 1776
Drew Street. All other drop-off centers will be deactivated when the curbside
recycling program is initiated.
Goals
To provide a recycling alternative to those citizens of Clearwater not yet
provided recycling service or not participating in available programs.
Measure: User surveys.
To provide a means of recycling materials not included in available residential
and multi-family programs.
Measure: Tons collected by type material.
1,1.',
:'{
. (.
, ',.
5
\,'
..
, .
,~. " \ ..'
. ~,' '*'
- ," " , ,.
.,,""'>' "
" ,~'
, ;,..,;j
PROCESSING AND MARKETING RECYCLABLES
Description
CSW will construct and operate a Processing Center for recyclable materials at
the Solid Waste Complex located at 1701 N. Hercules Avenue. There contaminants,
if any, will be removed and recyclables processed for shipment to market. Three
processing employees will be used initially; one equipment operator and two
maintenance workers. A dumping ramp and a processing building will be constructed.
A baling system will be installed capable of baling newspaper, corrugated cardboard,
plastic and steel cans. Other processing equipment used will be an aluminum can
crusher/blower, a skid loader and a forklift. Glass, separated by color, will be placed
into roll-off containers for shipment to end users. The most stable and lucrative
markets will be pursued by the CSW recycling staff on a continuing basis.
To optimize revenues contracts will be negotiated, when in the best interest of the
City, to market materials at the best prices. Options will include marketing materials
on the "spot market", utilizing the rail spur at the Solid Waste Complex to ship
materials to more distant markets and entering into agreements with neighboring
municipalities to purchase and market their recyclables. Revenue received from the
sale of the recycled material will be used to help defray operating costs, which in turn
will minimize the cost to citizens in the long term.
Goals
To provide optimum revenue through aggressive processing and marketing of
recyclables.
Measures: Process and market approximate annual tonnages of recyclables
as follows:
,l':",:
",
:,
6,600 tons in 1994
7,100 tons in 1995
7,600 tons in 1996
7,800 tons in 1997
8,000 tons in 1998
~ :
'. 6
i,
" - ~~
1. \/
, ,
'.' ~~
RECYCLING PROGRAM
ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING
1
,:1
Residential and Multi-Family Programs will be staffed initially as follows:
One
One
One
Nine
One
Two
TOTAL
(1) Recycling Coordinator (Range G)
(1) Recycling Representative (Range G)
(1) Supervisor (R-60)
(9) Sanitation Equipment Operators (R-48)
(1) Equipment Operator (R-39)
(2) Maintenance Worker I (R-36)
15 positions
In order to accomplish the initial staffing as indicated above, seven (7) new
positions will be required and eight (8) existing positions applied or converted to
conform to the recycling staffing table above.
One (1) Assistant Superintendent of Solid Waste/Special Services (Range I)
converted to Recycling Representative (recommended Range G).
One (1) Public Information Representative (R-46) converted to Recycling
Coordinator (recommended Range G) and funded in Solid Waste.
One (1) Solid Waste Supervisor (R-60) remains the same.
One (1) Sanitation Equipment Operator (R-48) remains the same.
Two (2) Heavy Equipment Operators (R-50) converted to Sanitation Equipment
Operator (R-48).
Two (2) Solid Waste Workers (R-41) converted to Maintenance Worker I (R-36).
Six (6) New Sanitation Equipment Operator positions (R-48) will be required.
One (1) New Equipment Operator position (R-39) will be required.
July 1, 1995, one additional Sanitation Equipment Operator (R-48) will be
required for the Multi-Family Program.
A Revised Organization Chart for The Recycling Section of the Solid Waste
Division, reflecting the initial staffing level is attached.
rocycpro.8cm
I
, i
7
" '
"
,
, '
~ '., .' t.... ,;, >
." ,
~
ZZ
~o
~~
~~
,~ ~
~~
00 ~ ~
~O~
oc..?
~~
u~
~~
~u
~~
,.-......
. ,...c
"-",.-......-
. ,...c ~
~ -: ;>:
o~~
o~;:J
U0VJ
aza
z~z
~~~
~U~
u>cU
i>lU>C
U~U
~~~
8
\0
O\('f')
('f")1
a · ~
z~-
--.. - ~
~,...c"-"
VJ "-" ·
oo~~
~o
O~
~~~
~;:Jz
0'<
~~
~
~
~-
<,...c
~"-"
.0
~~
~oo
;:J
~
~
Q-
~oo
00"-"
~o
~~
;:JOO
U
CI.)'t)
~po(
~~
~~
00
~~
~~
z~
::3~
u~
()~
~S
~~
~
o~
=~
~:S
CI.)~
e9z
~~
::3Q
~~
~rJ'.)
~~
i,
"
, ' I
<".;.4
"1
\
I
l:l:
g
~
~
o
~
z
~
~
..
~
CI
f,J;:l
Z
o
~
C
~
II
o
~
CI)
, .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.3 TECHNICAL and FINANCIAL EVALUATION
TOTAL 10 POINTS
WORTH RA TING
2
CRITERIA
COMMENTS
Adequacy of the proposed overall
operational plan.
Feasibility, operational reliability,
and sufficiency of the collection
system proposal.
1
Contingency capabilities of the
proposed collection system.
1
Demonstration of ability to
comply and maintain compliance
with all applicable ordinances,
rules, and regulations.
Past experience and applicability
of experience to proposed
condi tions.
1
1
Qualifications of key personnel.
1
Reports from references.
1
Financial strength based upon
financial reports and other
supporting data submitted.
1
Demonstrated environmental
awareness, including the latest
technology, cleanliness and
resources devoted to keeping
current with technology.
1
TOTAL WORTH: 10 POINT~
~. , . . <. . <' ~ . . ' " . , ., . . ~., ., < .,
. "'" ',' . . '.
, ,I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.5 RATE EVALUATION TOTAL 10 POINTS
CRITERIA COMMENTS WEIGHING RATING
FACTOR
a) Rates for provision of 45%
residential curbside/curbsort
collection service.
b) Rates for multi-family 10%
collection service.
c) Additional rate per residence 5%
for other than curbside (back
door, side door, etc.) collection
per container.
d) Rates for provision of 30%
commercial collection service
(taking into account HB 461).
e) Other: 5%
i) Cost of 2nd and subsequent
containers.
ii) Replacement of damaged or
missing containers.
iii) Wheeled bin toters
f) Provision of multi-material 5%
drop-off center at solid waste
complex 7 days/week
TU'lAL WUKl rt: 10 POIN~I
All competitive proposals shall be equally evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided,
support for all claims, made, and the overall approach taken.
I
s
" . -, #"'" .' . ' J' ' '. . # . . . .' . '. ~
"
. . . ~' " ' :. ' r;.
" '
, . ' ~ . -
, , ':'" ':!' "'""<'" ~~, ;',' ;
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
\4.4 AGREEMENT EVALUATION
10 POINTS I
/4.6 COMMERCIAL SERVICES
10 POINTS I
',,/<4.7 COMMUNITY SERVICE EVALUATION
10 POINTS I
:,: <
',~t ';. .
.~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REQUEST FOR COMPETITIVE I'ROPOSALS
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE and COl\1MERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
EVALUATION CRITERIA and RANKING PROCESS
4.8 RANKING PROCESS
a.) Technical and Financial Evaluation (TFE)
b.) Agreement Evaluation (AE)
c.) Rate Evaluation (RE)
d.) Commercial Services
e.) Community Service Evaluation (CSE)
TOTAL SCORE:
4(TFE) + 4(AE) + 6(RE) + 2 (Commercial Services) + 1 (CSE)
. \.".. ~.~,J" .' . " '. '.
," ,
:). ,
., . ~l
" .
.c
" . . ~
,. t'
j,.
EVALUATION AND COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION COMMITTEE
RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE AND COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
PRESENT: William Baird, General Services
William C. Baker, Public Works Director
Daniel J. Deignan, Assistant Director/DOAS
James H. McCurtain, 2829 Meadow Hill Drive North (34621)
Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager
John Scott, Utility Customer Service Manager
Joined the Meeting at 2:20 p.m.
Michael Wright, City Manager
Betty Deptula, Assistant City Manager
Bob Brumback, Assistant Public Works Director/Utilities
Paul Nystrom, Public Works Finance f\1anager
DATE:
September 8, 1993 at 2:00 p.m.
Kathy Ric~ began the meeting by explaining to the committee that the reason she wanted to meet
was to review what the committee had previously decided, what wasn't clear, etc. She further
explained that the committee had ranked the City as the top ranked firm and the committee needs
to try and negotiate a contract. Some of the issues that need to resolved are:
1) Page 3: Data gathering - stay with contract language.
2)
Page 4: Dumpsters.
3) Page 5 G): add effective with the opening of the North Hercules
site.
4) Page 6 (1.4 Rates)
5)
6)
Page 9 (4.3 Bond and Insurance)
Page 12: took out clause that would allow a person the right to go
to the City Manager, then the City Commission if they were not in
agreement.
7)
8)
Page 13 (Bill and Administration): clearer language.
Asked the City to submit a Business Plan and a Proforma for five
years.
, . ,>;~
"..{
: 1
"
. .~.
, '~I
' ,,;\,
,
:}.
dl
'd
, ';:'1
,
, i
"'" .-
i
1
I
I
I
I
I
,. , ....
.; 'I."
, ",'
. -
Page -2-
Recycling Committee
September 8, 1993
Sinkine Fund~
Mrs. Rice stated that the City Manager had met with Mr. Brumback and Mr. Nystrom and there
seems to be some confusion about what was in the Proforma, specifically the sinking fund. Mr.
Baird replied that he was under the impression that there was concern if something were to
happen, then it would not be a burden to the taxpayers and money that was accumulated could be
used for personnel issues. Mr. McCurtain questioned that if two years into the project they have
not met projections and sever their relationship, what happens to the equipment? The ideas was
to set aside this sinking fund so money could be used to purchase new equipment. Mr. Baker
recalled there was some fear of what if this fails? There was a need to satisfy resources. The
numbers are responsive and he never heard that the sinking fund was to be used to purchase
equipment. Mrs. Rice asked if the standard garage funds are included? Mr. Baird responded that
the money in the garage fund is for purchases. Mr. McCurtain stated that he did not remember
a figure of $300,000 - 400,000 city-wide. Mr. Baker responded that there is a sinking fund built
up and Mr. McCurtain asked what would happen to that money if Kimmins got the bid? Mr.
Baker responded that it would reimburse solid waste to buy equipment. Mr. Deignan stated he
remembered a CIP project and this money would be reappropriated at City Commission discretion
should the City not get the bid. Mr. Baird remembered the money would be used in case the
operation did not succeed to help take care of employees. Mr. Baker disagreed.
Accountability:
Mrs. Rice noted that they had asked for one person to be accountable, but only 10% of the top
pers~n's salary was listed. Mr. Baker responded that of the entire administrative cost for the solid
waste function, 10% is being funded by recycling. Mrs. Ric~ felt a specific person should be in
charge and spend 100% of their time for the project. Mr. Baker, replied that Bob Brumback
would and is responsible for this operation, but would not devote 100% of his time to the project.
Mr. McCurtain felt that one specific person would not have to spend 100% of his time on this
project. He further stated that someone should be in charge and this should be 100% of his or
her responsibility. Mr. Baker stated that Jim Maglio does nothing but solid waste and there is a
recycling coordinator and employees who do nothing but recycling.
Mrs. Rice asked Mr. Bmmback to present his Business Plan and Proforma and to explain where
the money was coming from concerning the garage charges. She also asked Mr. Brumback to take
out commercial rates because each fund is supposed to stand alone. Mr. Brumback agreed and
distributed the following: Overall Five Year Recycling Program Profonna,' Residential Five Year
"\
I
j
:A
J
\1
1
I
I
. 1
.\
.1
I
\
'I
...':1
Business Plan and Prgforma:
At this time, the following people joined the meeting: Michael Wright, Betty' Deptula, Bob.
Brumback, Paul Nystrom.
'.;.' :
Page -3-
Recycling Committee
September 8, 1993
Recycling Program Proforma; Multi-Family Five Year Recycling Program Proforma,' Commercial
Five Year Recycling Program Proforma; Combined Residential, Multi-Family and Commercial
Recycling Proforma,' Residential Curbside/Sort Summary,' Multi-Family Summary; Commercial
Cardboard and Business Summary,' and a Processing and Marketing Summary.
Mrs. Rice asked if the Business Plan had a number for personnel and what was included in garage
charges. Mr. Brumback explained that what he had distributed is his Business Plan and Proforma.
Mr. McCurtain questioned if the commercial section used the same assumptions? Mr. Nystrom
explained that he changed the assumptions on the commercial section to 40% over the five years
and it goes down to 32%. He did not adjust anything on the bid (anything negotiable). Mrl
Brumback stated he did not realize he was expected to present a Business Plan at this meeting.
I
Mr. Brumback stated the staff is 16 positions in Recycling. Eight of them are currently filled and
he would ask to hire ten more and would hire seven recycling truck drivers and three for
processing and marketing, one equipment operator and two maintenance worker 1's, the public
information rep would be upgraded to a recycling representative, solid waste equipment operator
and heavy equipment operator stays the same, two heavy equipment operators will be downgraded
to equipment operators. Mr. McCurtain asked if all eight new positions would be for recycling
only and Mr. Nystrom responded that they would.
'~!
, 'I
!
:\
,I
Mr. McCurtain questioned the 20% City of Clearwater impact fees.
Mrs. Rice stated she wanted some type of acknowledgement that would state they would use only
Solid Waste people in a emergency. Mr. Brumback explained that they would start out with
sixteen people, add two in mid-1995 and one January 1, 1997. Mrs. Rice confirmed that there
would be eighteen people over 1997, with eight currently filled.
Mr. McCurtain asked if a $300,000 investment would be set up for start off and Mr. Brumback
explained that $1 million to start-- $300,000 for processing, $524,000 for trucks. Mr. Deignan
stated that the trucks would be lease purchased. Mr. Scott asked if $300,00 would be used to
reduce rates and Mr. Nystrom explained that the rates would go down, $300,000 to pay a note
and to also make an investment in dumpsters. Mr. Nystrom further explained the residential
revenues.
Mr. Brumback explained that they would be paying back a $150,000 grant so it would not give
them an unfair advantage over the competition. Mr. Brumback explained the money would be
paid into a retained earnings fund.
Mr. Scott questioned that the personnel only indicated 8.5 employees, multi-family and
commercial and the supervisor is split up over the three functions. Mr. McCurtain noted that the
same people are being expensed to commercial. Mr. Nystrom stated that only one supervisor and
one front-end loader with an operator would be affected. Mr. Brumback added that multi-family
,I
\
I
",I
J
'~'~~,!
,~
" ,
Page -4-
Recycling Committee
September 8, 1993
"
.0:,1
'" ~
.~Sl
and residential stand alone. Mr. Nystrom explained that 10% of the solid waste administrative
charges are charged. Mr. McCurtain asked if there is one person solely responsible and Mr.
Brumback stated that there is a first line supervisor and that person is 100 % responsible and Jim
Maglio is also 100% responsible.
Mrs. Rice addressed the garage charges. Mr. Nystrom stated that the vehicles that are assigned
to recycling are lease purchased, as well as eighteen they already have, replacement costs are not
included, operation, maintenance, and insurance are included.
Mr. Wright and Mrs. Deptula left the meeting (3: 15 p.m.).
There was discussion concerning the inclusion of commercial and Mr. Brumback reiterated that
each program stood alone and approximately $27,000 would be charged against multi-family and
residential if commercial wasn't included.
.Mr. McCurtain asked why there was a 40% profit. Mrs. Rice asked if they would be reallocating
$27,000 to half in residential or more in multi-family. Mr. McCurtain expressed several times
that he thought they were making too much money in the multi-family program and felt that the
commercial portion of the bid needed to be taken out. Mr. Baker agreed and directed Mr.
Brumback to back out the commercial program all together from the bid.
,'"
.1,
~
'oj
'I
Mrs. Rice asked Mr. Brumback when he would be ready to get into the recycling business.
Mr. Brumback said that it would be two to three months following City Commission approval.
Mr. Deignan reminded the committee that there would be a two or three year review. Mrs. Rice
corrected him by saying that it would be an annual review within three months of the end of the
year. Mr. Brumback felt the agreement was satisfactory. Mr. Brumback and Mr. Nystrom left
the meeting at 3:30 p.m.
Mrs. Rice explained to the committee that she had met with Kimmins' attorney and told him that
the City is trying to negotiate a contract. They indicated they were not filing a formal bid protest,
but were just information gathering. She informed the committee she would finalize the
agreement, prepare the agenda item and copy the committee.
The meeting adjourned at 3:35 p.m.
I
'<'I
,.,
I
;!
!
t
J
u
15,.. q~
\.'
AGENDA
'WI
ITEM #
:3
+.;2IIt/
..,;.
.-......---.,...-.. ....., ...t....'~
','..
~~( (.J 11/1-1-($ 3
[1-3 /):Vy')
'~'-v
C..
I
!
i
I
, i
(t I
i
g
Ii I
~ I
,
"
j
~ ,
I
" !
" !
'i
~t 1
\\ i
{..
,~ 1
.:i! I
~ I
~
~ I
~
!
t
I
~ f
is
~ I
I i
I
~ I
:;j
..
ti-~
'.
Ji
~
?
~
~
j
"1
'"
d
f'
~
.
;;
t
j
"".m,.
:j:t~:!:i:i:
:I:~:~:~:i:r
,<.. ... ",.
,<.,. ... .,.
". '" '" .."
< ....,. _t.. ".
., <. <. .... ,...
.<. <., 0" '...
: ~ : : : : : : ; : : : ~ ~ < .. : <
: : ~ ~! ~ t : \ \ ~ l' ~ : \ j . : [ : : : ~ [:
.,.
[:1
\
.... <, <.,.:::::.;:::,:>>.
"::.: ::::, ::: ;';::
, " '. '<'
... . ..<,
, . : : : : : : : : : : .. :::;:::::::::::::::::::::
..... < <., .,. <.
""" '.. .... <
..", "'., "._,
. ..... .,.,.<
,. .,..,.,
. .,....,
,. '" ,.. ."
. -" .
,. ..,...... ,.."...
.,..,.." "
".. .<,'., .
....,.... .,..'
. ....,. <.. ." <:
.< '...,..
., ,<. ,...
. ".,: .::'::::: ::::::.:
, <<. ,.. ......
" "',
. . . . ~ : ; : : : : : : : : : ..
.,. <.....::: ,...,..
,., .. "'<"
"...- ., <
,., '. ,.< ,..,
" .......::::,.".,
, .. ".
, . . : : : : : ~ ; ; ~ ~ : : : ' :
, . . .. . . : : : : : . . .
" <<."..
...'... "
.... .....
. " ...., <...,.....
.<.......,. .
.<.....< '..
.. ... .,"..
.,....... .
'.. ... <. <
......tIII:::.::::
.. to .,. 0
.. .....'..
::~"'" ::::::::
.. , ...,...<
,. ......"
: : iiiI-;.:II" . ' .. . .. .. ,
.,. '<'"
.. ' ".,. ....',-.
. . . . , , . ' , -
..r:..... '
,< '" ......
.. ....,...
:~i,;::.:::~::::
:: _:::',:::
. .....,.., ....
" . ..,..
.. . ,...
.. ...
: :- : ::....:.:::::::::
. ........,..,...
., "< - ..",'.,
" .<. ,','
~~~.~::::;.:
::~.:':::':
::1:::::::::::
::-=---::::::.:
." ,. 0..
,. .. ..,.. <
.. .
I
I
I
!
I
t
I
i
i
\
!
!
!
;
i
I
I
i
I
'.' ,.. '"
"..,,"::::
" ... ...
., < .,. ..,
"" ", '.'
., ,. .., ..,
...' .,< ':: :... .. ,. '"
.. ,.<.. .,. ..' ".
...,..,.... -.,.,.
~.~~ i~. .'j:: ))': !.j)~:
.. .::::::::..........
. .. . , , : : : : : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0- ... .t. '.,
. " . . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
'0' <'. ... ...
. . ". ..-
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :- . ..
". .... ." -"
'..', ..
:::>::;~::::
......~.. '
......1.............;
, . '.' .... '0..'
, ~ : : : : : : : : :: : : : : ; :
., . <" < ".. ,. ......'
....,<..:' :::::::::.
. .
, <,. " .... ... to'
'... ." t..
,., < .., ..,
.: :: ::: : :: : ~: ~ < ~ \:
0.<' ....0.
'.: 0:::'::;: :::::::
'" .... ..,
. .~
There's Gold On That Hill
a presentation
by the City of Clearwater
to
The St. Petersburg/Clearwater Tourist Development Bureau
Like the Conference and Visitors Bureau, the City of Clearwater is prospecting for tourists
and business visitors' dollars. From 1990 through this year, we have conducted feasibility
studies to determine what development activities would bring the most favorable return on
investment. Our review and discussion of these studies has been thorough and our
conclusion brings us here today.
Clearwater's City Commission has a prospecting plan which wi" bring a significant and
previously unmined source of revenue to Pinellas County. The same plan generates new
business opportunities and validates Clearwater's commitment to revitalizing its downtown.
The plan gives the citizens of Clearwater a downtown assembly area that can accommodate
seminars, meetings, conventions and trade shows, and transforms vacant City Property into
a Clearwater landmark.
The plan is to convert the three story structure formerly occupied by Maas Brother's
Department Store into a convention/conference and entertainment center. Because of its
size and location, this multipurpose center has no competition on the West Coast of Florida.
Instead, it compliments existing facilities in our County, namely the Bayfront Center and the
Thunderdome.
Due to its size, interior layout and structural condition, the Maas Brother's Building' is
particularly well suited for this conversion. Its strategic hillside location on the bluff
adjacent to Clearwater Bay is one of the most beautiful sites in Florida available for
development. Its proximity to State Road 60 and the Beach Causeway make it highly visible
and easily accessible. The existing parking lots are adequate for full capacity use. Add to
this the financial projections for a proposed third floor entertainment complex - and you will
see why there is definitely "Gold On that Hilll"
(1)
'"
~,
,
There's Gold on That HiIIl
A Presentation by The City of Clearwater
WHY BUILD A MAJOR AUDIENCE-SUPPORT FACILITY?
A 1993 study conducted by Research Data Services, Inc, for this organization, shows that
the volume of tourism in Pinellas County is slipping. Other areas, such as Jacksonville,
Daytona, Tallahassee and Tampa are the ones "striking it richll. By offering a national-class
entertainment and conference center in the heart of Clearwater - an area still rich in un-
mined treasures - we keep a greater percentage of visitor revenue here at home.
To be competitive, we need to keep pace with what other areas are doing in terms of
providing convention-exhibit hall facilities. At present, Clearwater has no public facility to
attract larger, out-of-town groups. When trade or consumer show organizers consider sites,
we want to be at the top of the i r list.
I
Clearwater's downtown business district will gain much from a combination
conference/convention and entertainment center. Nationally, the convention-meeting
industry continues to grow rapidly and is a lucrative business'. Convention and trade show
attendees pump IInew moneyll2 into a variety of secondary businesses such as hotels,
restaurants and retailing. Many of these secondary businesses will owe their existence to
the center; others will expand because of it.
Clearwater Harbor has always been a gold mine. The natural beauty of the site inspired the
settlement of Clearwater and the downtown grew around this bluff. When Maas Brothers
was looking for a place to put one of their flagship retail stores, they chose this site - and
for many years it was a gold mine for them.
Times have changed and the building is now vacant - but the mine is not empty. We are
convinced that the site still possesses the ability to attract visitors. It's a mine filled with
gold ore- and this plan will get it.
I
IHammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 2
2Hammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 3
(2)
,"'
. "',")
There's Gold on That Hill!
A Presentation by The City of Clearwater
The City owns the Maas Brothers site, thus the land for this multi-purpose complex is now
available for development. According to a July, 1990 study conducted by Hammer, Siler,
George and Associates, a facility totalling 152,000 square feee would serve the needs of
the groups and organizations interested in holding events in Clearwater. The Maas Brothers
building, with a net area of 153,500 square feet4, meets these requirements.
The number of conventions and trade shows with exhibits has grown steadily in recent
years5. Continuing stability of this market indicates that this facility would blaze a trail of
financial opportun ity for the St Petersburg/Clearwater area.
PROOF OF NEED
The Hammer study concluded that existing meeting space in Clearwater does not serve the
convention/conference market, except for some smaller local events. Under 20/0 of major
convention business in Florida is held in Clearwater6. This low share clearly reflects the
lack of adequate exhibit hall space to accommodate anything but the smallest events. No
facility in Clearwater provides more than 13,000 square feet for trade or consumer shows.
Only two facilities can handle banquets of 200 people or sea.t 1,200 people in one
location7. Given this picture, the prospects look good that a Clearwater Convention Center
would attract exhibits requiring more than 13,000 square feet of space.
3Hammer" Siler, George & Associates, page 74
-fHeery, page 17
SHammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 30
6Hammer, Sil~r, George & Associates, page 31
7Hammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 25
(3)
There's Gold on That Hill!
A Presentation by The City of Clearwater
SITE SUITABiliTY
Clearwater is an optimal location for Pinellas County to "stake its claim" for a share of the
Convention business riches. There are only five or six small centers serving the Florida
Market in the 40 to 104 thousand square foot size range. Of these, Jacksonville and
Daytona currently offer the most attractive environments8. Our area can compete with
these sites and there will be little competition for the gold in the "New West Coast" of
Florida - the Pinellas County/Clearwater area. The three major facilities operating in the
Tampa Bay Region - the Tampa Convention Center, Bayfront Center and the Thunder Dome
- all serve widely differing functions9. The proposed Clearwater Center fills this market,
yet does not duplicate any existing facility. It compliments, rather than competes with these
facilities. The top selection criteria for a facility of this type is availability of hotels,
restaurants, shopping and entertainment. - services that Clearwater can offer in
abundance 10.
In a 1990 survey of 55 events, 36 groups responded favorably to a question as to whether
members of their groups would like' to meet in Clearwater. The average attendance of
groups responding favorably to the survey was 1,576 persons with an average length of stay
of 3.6 days. Survey data shows that the groups need approximately half as many hotel
rooms as attendeesl1. All but two groups indicated a need for exhibit space, with an
average requirement of 36,500 square feet12. This survey supports the conclusion that
there is a market for a fad lity such as the one proposed.
"
. .
SHammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 39
9Hammer, Siler, George &; Associates, page 48
10Hammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 81
1tHammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 55
""t'
, >~
12Hammer, Siler, George & Associates, page S6
(4)
There's Gold on That Hi1//
A Presentation by The City of Clearwater
FUN DI NG/COSTS
What will it take to actively mine this gold in Clearwater? A 1993 study of the Maas
Brothers Building, conducted by Heery, concludes that approximately $5.8 million dollars
would allow the City to convert the building into a furnished Convention and entertainment
facility. This cost includes structural requirements as well as finishes, equipment,
furnishings, mechanical and electrical systems1.J. We are asking the Convention and
Visitors Bureau Council for $5 million in support of this project. The City will furnish the
site, purchased for $1.9 million; invest the $.8 million required to complete the project and
commit $300,000 to landscape the area, as well as provide ongoing operating and
marketing services. As mentioned, an entertainment center is proposed for the third floor.
This PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP will help defer the costs of operating the facility.
RETURN ON THIS INVESTMENT?
With aggressive management and promotion, the proposed Convention Center should be
able to attract 58 events per year upon stabilization. This will produce 145 event days,
with a total attendance draw of 85,000 people yearly14.
The Entertainment Complex, proposed for the third floor of the Center would include food,
beverage and a hi-tech "Million Dollar Midway". The Midway would offer billiards,
electronic baseball and virtual reality entertainment. A high degree of synergy is likely
between this project and the Conference/Convention center. Entertainment Complexes of
this sort are operating successfully in Dallas, Houston and Atlanta1S. They utilize a "free
form/unstructured" seating plan that encourages customers to roam freely throughout the
complex. .he complex may include a: main dining room overlooking Clearwater Bay,
13Heery, Scheme C, page 17
HHammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 72
15William L. Haralson & Associates, page 5
(5)
" :','''''
.',
There's Gold on That HiIIl
A PreseTltation by The City of Clearwater
lounge facilities, a Comedy Club, Dinner Theatre and the Million Dollar Midway. Such
complexes have broad market appeal and generate substantial repeat visits due to the
multitude of activities offered and their participatory nature'6. The Maas
Brothers/Clearwater location is ideal for this type of establishment, according to an August
1993 study conducted by William L. Haralson and Associates17. The site is visible from
the Causeway, capitalizing on traffic patterns to and from the Beach 18. Clearwater, through
its association with PST A, will triple the Clearwater Trolley Service to six cars. These cars
will run on flexible schedules, providing quick and convenient transportation from area
hotels to the Convention Center. For those visitors who prefer to drive, substantial parking
is available. Adding windows to the third floor would provide a spectacular view of
Cfearwater Harbor and the Gulf.
Within 30 miles of the site there is a population of some 1.9 million residents and the St.
Petersburg/Clearwater Area tourist market of approximately 3.7 million people19. It is'
estimated that Clearwater alone is host to approximately three quarters of a million tourists
each year20. Attendance at the proposed Entertainment Complex is projected at 242,000
during the first year of operation21. There is no facility of this type in the Tampa Bay
area.
The average tourist spends 8.5 days in the 5t Petersburg/Clearwater Area22 - ample time
to enjoy the beaches, theme parks and attractions and still have time to enjoy other
16William L. Haralson & Associates, page 28
17William L. Haralson & Associates, page 3
18William L. Haralson & Associates, pages 7 & 10
19William L. Haralson & Associates, page 4
20William L. Haralson & Associates, page 22
21William L. Haralson & Associates, page 4
22William L. Haralson & Associates, page 24
'.J,.
(6)
;,~ ,
, .'
. '. .
There's Gold on That Hill!
A Presentation by The City of Clearwater
/
pursuits. For many locals, the beaches are not as significant an attraction. This Complex
would offer residents alternative entertainment.
ECONOMIC IMPACT
The convention/meeting industry is growing rapidly. The S1. Petersburg/Clearwater Area can
stake a claim now for a larger share of this business. Conventions and other meetings bring
thousands of visitors and millions of dollars into a community3. Conventions and trade
show business is especially lucrative for hotels, restaurants and retail establishments.
Convention delegate spending is entirely "new money" to be brought into the lINew West
Coast "- the St Petersburg/Clearwater Area. This spending will support restaurants,
entertainment districts and quality retailing, which in turn enhances the quality of life,
creating employment and business opportunities for local residents.
Tourists are "worth their weight in gold..." - based on 1992/93 statistics provided by the
S1. Petersburg/Clearwater Area Conference and Visitor's Bureau, each visitor brings an
average of $504 into the Community - that's a total of $43 million in direct revenue yearly,
based on an attendance figure of 85,000 people per year.
Financial projections for the third floor entertainment complex alone are estimated at
$3.39 million during the first year of operation24. Deducting for operating expenses and
cost of sales, gross operating income (before occupancy costs and capital costs) is estimated
at $1.09 million the first year25.
23Hammer, Siler, George & Associates, page 2
2"William L. l:'faralson & Associates, page 34
25William L. Haralson & Associates, page 37
(7)
;"
, i ~'. ,.: "..,:l..-~,
There's Gold on That Hill!
A Presentation by The City of Clearwater
I
~ <
, ,
" .
;...
. .,.'.
< f.;
" ','
n
:';}.;I'i,,'f'
OVERALL IMPACT/SUMMARY
Publ ic assembly facilities, such as the convention/conference/entertainment facility that we
are proposing, contribute to the quality of life in a community and stimulate and support
economic activity. Location of such a facility at the Maas Brothers site will also contribute
to downtown revitalization, with all its subsequent benefits.
A facility such as this one, is truly a gold mine. It will serve as a catalyst for new private
investment, starting with the third floor Entertainment Complex. It will provide
employment. It supports, not only the hotel/motel and entertainment interests in our
commun ity but all of the support markets for these interests.
It provides an opportunity to transform a City owned property into a IDeal landmark and
gives all of Pinellas County increased visibility and marketabil ity.
We ask you to join with us as we mine the gold on that hilll
(8)
, .;, < ',: ;.; ','l< ".h, .
s
tIj
.~
~
E<2
~
c::
:::s
(3
tI1
res
--......
~
())
s:::
· !--t .
.Ct.;.
"
,-
. "
~
t::.
:::1
8
8
~
. ......
V;}
..-..
~
~
""'-I
(tf
::J
c:
~
'j
,
l
/
~
'<
.
!
\
/~
i
i
,
/
/
./
\, <
<'.\.
\.
\
"\
'\
\
....
\..
\.
\
! '\
, ..\
} .
\
...
.' '.00'
':'0
.~
.-
.....,
.,. u:l
::s
,0
...c::
f-1
<::'
o
C'\
t.
~
o
o
co
yo
("f")
c-
o
(-.
...
{'t')
'I
I
".:1'.
. .
T
:J..,~
*"'''';.
o
c::~
\0
...
f'1
'.
"""""".
.,~....~ .
....fI.....::...
'..
......
o
.0
tri
,,-
M
, ~
"'.
......
~.,
"',,-,
........... ..
o
o
-.::::t"
yo
tf'")
<='
o
~
t.
t")
c:--l
C'\
r;;;r-.,
'"'4
..-.!
0',
c\
,-1..'
o
c,
0,
..-.!
'-
'-oJ ,
C()
0\
,-1
co
eX)
0,
~
r.--:--
co
0\
-.I
'-0
J 00
'.' 0\
c~
o
("-1
.,.
(")
'~
, .' ~
. ..
U
C
~
)
4~'
#'
V"J
8
--
e:
<1)
(/).
-
"y
....
'..~
o
~
,. 'I.
.~
.
......
~.
IV
, (/')
..u
~
,:1)
o
~
~
o
en
,,,,,,:',>,:.,'....:::,..}!{.
, .," . . ;, \?
. ,'~
., ; .'
,,' ':' <'
'".,It
. j,
.'
"
i
,
,
i
!
i .
I
I
I
I
I
!
;
I
I
~~
~~ \.D "-
(1)
t,~ tr) l.~ +-J
as
N '-;)'
\Q ~
* N
"-
6 0 ctS
~ CD
-
()
. .....
~
'c:: rJJ
.~ Q)
~ .....
--------- cd
00 ~ . ..-I
ill C,)
'C:: N 0
VJ
0 VJ
<
,',
<s~ C1)
~~ 00 b.O
t- ~
0
<::) <U
0) '-'
0)
~
........ ;... .
(1)
.~ ~~ ......
.~
CI)
..-. co
~ N --- I
M I
.(1.) Q)
S I
~ ~ I
;...., . ..... (\) 1-1 S I' '
U - rJJ I
('\:$ .- I
';(1) ~ "0 > i3 ~ I
M ro I-l = i
'~ CtS B <1) cd It) <U I
~ ""0 tU ~ ~ ~ - I
~ ~ ~ - aJ 0 . .
.......
I-t...i . .... ::s .- Os '\j ~ ~ <1),
.. po ....
:j' L: ~ ~ ~ s a P-c C1) (.)
::ctS 't3 C'd
',' clj ro '1: S <U ...c= ....
~ 0 0 ~ .- 0- ~ =
~ Cd ~ ~ ~ ...-c
....~ ~ ~ M ~ 0 u 0 0
tL; II 11 II II II C/J
, , ',,", , .... " ,'/. '
"',':,1
',tn
't1
(J)
,(J)
~
5~
o ~
Ct:::L.
qj
.......... Q.)
JYG
o .~
~~
Rt:S
::s (U
o~
. l-::e Lt
(j~
. '.'
. "
,'.' ,..,
i'
'" \;
~ .:~'.'
~': ','i' ,.'
~~~
('f") f.'f'") ~
('t)
,.
~
o
~
CI'J.
Q)
+-
t-d
. .....
t)
.0
VJ.
VJ.
<
(1)
bl}
M
o
(1)
d
~
0'\
~
CJ\
~
~
('f')
o
\.()
N
II
V
.
o
o
o
~
I
~
l()
t'-
o
o
Vi
,..-.4
I
~
o
o
,..-.4
,.-..1
o
o
tr)
II
^
o
o
o
N
I
~
o
t()
~
o
o
lI')
I
,.-.1
V)
N
o
\f)
..........
I
~
o
\f)
.
.
~
~
<U
....-.4
. .....
(/)
...
~
<U
S
S
cd
=r::
. .
(1)
C)
M
=
o
CI)
" ''''n
,'. ""'~'
" ~ ::~'~;
'"
'.
'~
;'.!
:",
)' ';
"
00 lI1
OJ
. .--I ' """ ~
""""
00 '""" .-0
~ 0
.~ u 0 0)
~ 0 tI.2
~ 0
cU ~ ~
~ . .;::j lL ~ 0
~ :Jtt#J. 0 ;.....
(f) (f) I 0 ~
ra ~ ~ Iri
~ ~ ~ 0 (X)
-+-' 0 Oi r- ~ (V)
. ......... (3 LO "" C\J
U r- ~
'..... ('1
(.--I l ....._~ 0 0\
I I 0\
Q) u.
C/) ~
Q ~ ~ .
0
.-
co ,~ ......
Ul lr;. -
.....
I ;U
s:: ~
..... 0\
:::1 ~ c...
0 0\
0 -
I 0 Cj ~
Cl. 0 >-
U)
-~ C4
I
~ ~
:::1 . ....
~ ,.... 0
-
.....
(/) 0 0 0\
0 ,....
....
~ r;:. \d ~ ~ \r) 0 0'\
~ -c-I
Q 0.. .... f,..) c:: '''I I U ~
f.1) 0 l' '. ,. '
+-' ,;..j S c v ~
- j;.>-~ ~
.'... .~
Q) ~ -' ~ o:d >- ...s ~ .
,..." .... <:'I:I~ ...... (,\)
~ ~ C"J =--- ......
Z - +-l 0 ~ ~
."" r.f;;
0 ~ - ~
C r '
.--4 v' s::
l' '
V r.;I... ~ -
......
;...) ~
,-' ..-.
- ,.. '\
- V
.'<1
~ . ~
~
U
M
::J .'
C ' ,
(/J
, '
I
i
i
I
i..
U1 L..t
\U
~ ~
t::
(JJ
~ ()
(1) ~
I J ~
wi-' co
~ E
h:
. iloooot
Q3
'1oW
~
(1) (l)
~
,....
~
U tq
~ ~
Q)
cO 1Il
()
r-cj ~
~ ~
~
Q)
~I .
I J
~
'D
(1)
wi-'
0
(])
· · 1
0
~
P-.
'..'~ ,", I"'., ,.:<,' ',' <' ~ ,< <' \', :'. .:' :'.':':~';-
:. ..:'. ',~ ,... :' ~ ,.,. .... ....: ':' ,... .~' -: '..~'\'~~~
0 .-" - .-. -.. .- .-
- '-' "-' '- '- "'-"
-. .-" - ....... -.. .- .-
-- -- '-' -' '- '-' '-"
0 ~ - .-. .:::> .- -
- '-' '-" '-' '-"
"'. ro ~. ...., " '" "'.
-- -. -.. ..- - -... --
-- -- '-- - -- '-..; --
0 }rJ ......... 'V" J .- lr~
'- '-'
r"'~ ("-\I f".l ~ '""""'"
...
......
,.......,
- .""'"
~ .....,.
,"""'f\
C. ....... .
0\
~ ~
~ II
"!)
~}
~ ''.)0
...
~ ::;:1'.
~ 0..
> Y"""'<
~
'"'1
.... "~
.....,
U
oI-l
,...,
-
''-'
~
.....
.....
a...;
'l-"
.,....
<
..-l
~
;::i
~
'H
~
...
f'.....
0-.
0-..
~
II
'C .
0' u
0' ;:::;
~ i-i
,,",
r.I:l
~
~
lI'~ ~
'\'"'4
0' U
.0\ 0
~ ~
II t:/.l
<C
J(j
......
-
0
tZ;
~
~
a...
~
~
~
. .
~
U
-
:::.;
0
V,:)
U1 ~
OJ
<1) .~
~
~ OJ
U
~ ~
~
<1) OJ
s
:> ~
""''i
<1) m
'~
~ ~
<l.~
,~~
~ t::
U1 r.q
~
<1) <1J
t':j
U1 0
~ &
~
<1) ~
~
~
--0
Q)
Cd
S "-
. ........
+-'
r.J)
r:.Ll
Q"\
0\
0\
~
'. r
(
}
~
:,
v}
~
(,I)
.....
.....
."
w
p..
,.....
I ~r)
-
II
, ,
. f.:> ':' '~ ...':.:':;
. ,'. " .
, I"~ \' < '"
~
i:i\
~;\
"<"4
Ic:::'i ~. '0::;' ~ "M
,21 ~ ,.e., ,2~ ,2~
\[i ~ ('f; (''\) .....,
':/'.i sri r/.. l,..'1 v"1
r-
,.....,
0;
l-!
II
~, ,1'-'. , L
:5\ ' .,
'-/
(-.
0\ .....
~ ~
"
.j) "J;
,- W
_J +-l
- l.['i cj
-
^, '0
w 0-.
..
...,.. 0, r.
tv '-/
"<"4 ;Z;
N .f
II ~
- .<f"
'':
~
Q
.....
"""I
C
"Ji
-...
C)
Jo..<
~ -
~ ...,
~
.-. ;.i..;
'-'
Vi
<U
~.)
Jo..<
~
C
CI:l
.
.Lf~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4748
, City Commission
CO:N.lfIDENTIAL MEl.\.J:ORANDUM
TO:
Michael Wright, City Manager
FROM:
DATE:
Fred A. Thomas, Commissioner
SUBJECT:
Holiday On The Islands
November 5, 1993
COPIES TO:
:Mayor, Commissioners
____.___.__________....__.._.______..._____...______._.__~~..__.___.~...___u._~~........_A_._~__.___~_______
Attached Is a letter I bave recently received fr.om Shirley Moran, Chairperson for Holiday On
'!he Islands. You mayor may not be aware that there is a special promotion going on during
the Christmas season on Island Estates, Sand Key and Clearwater Beach.
Part of the promotion is special Christmas decorations by all of the merchants. There is a
special buy being made for several thousand dollars to decorate the light poles and the outside
areas of the beach for beautifying the tourist areas this Christmas. The problem is tbat the
" , merchants cannot decorate their stores because of our Sign Ordinance which limi.ts their signage
if they put Christmas decorations and lighting in their store windows and storefronts.
Please have someone review whether or not the Sign Ordinance of the City of Clearwater is that
restrictive that the merchants cannot use Christmas decorations in their store and special
Christmas lighting in their store windows, and have that adversely impact the Sign Code and the
signs they have for their business. Either the merchants misunderstand our Sign' Ordinance, or
our Sign Ordinance misunderstands the Christmas spirit. I would like some help here. Please
let. me know what is going on so I can relay to all of the merchants who ask me what they can
do for Christmas. Thank you.
, 'FAT/sr
RECEIVED
NOV 08 1993
CITY CLER K DEPT.
I
!
G/S'd
l0:61 86, sa ^ON
';',"}. P:
. ,:,
, ""\:,~,:;
, ..~'
'. :'.'.,/;;);t
." ';,';'.,',.,.
'.
,
\ '~,
"
I
~., , ,
f' '..t.
~ji 1
, .,
.," '. \., '... " "<~-,, ," ,
yC\
Honorable Rita Garvey
Mayor
City of Clearwater
1~2 South Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL 34616
8 November 1993
Dear Mayor Garvey:
We the Holidays on the Islands Committee respectfully
request consideration for the City to Co-Sponsor our
event which will take place on Sunday December 5, 1993
from 4:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. on Clearwater Beach in the
area of Kruz Gardens behind the civic Center TO THE
EXTENT OF WAIVING THE LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENT.
As well as the entertainment, the Clearwater Beach
Association will be providing Holiday Lights and or
Decorations in the Barnett Bank Triangle, the Kruz
Gardens and the Welcome to Clearwater Sign. As time is
of the essence we hope this will receive your
immediate attention.
. '.'
Very truly yours,'", ,
~?L' 1I.;d9f~
Shi;~~ill Moran . .
Chairperson
324 Leeward Island
Clearwater, FL 34630
(813)442-1660
Thanking you in advance, I remain,
, i,
. iJ>/~,
;:
,,'
P~~(VJO(k-r;;f
lib
Lie.
'rIlo v eeL -1-0
I/~ 8/7 3
.'i