10/07/1993
AGENDA
DATE
10
-
-t. ."
...,,""'_....~-
"'to", ...~..
.
.
,
.
otnm \ss Ion
.r
"
10
7
-
13
"
,1:
Mee+,
...
. ~:
.f.....'
ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING - October 7, 1993 (6:00 P.M.)
Welcome. We are glad to have you join us. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then.
state your name and address. Persons speaking before the City Commission on other than Public
Hearing items shall be limited to 3 minutes. No person shall speak more than once on the same
subject unless granted permission by the City Commission.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
Service Awards
Introductions and Awards
Presentations
Minutes of Regular Meeting September 16,
1993
1. Mayor.
2. Reverend Thurman Rivers, Skycrest United
Methodist Church.
3. None.
4. Citation of Appreciation to Bruce Littler for
service on Marine Advisory Board.
5. None.
6. Approved as amended.
Not Before 6:00 P.M. - Scheduled Public Hearings
(1) Presentation of issues by City staff.
(2) Statement of case by applicant or
representative (5 minutes).
(3) Statement of case by opposition (5
minutes).
(4) Commission questions.
(5) Comments in support and in opposition: (a)
individual (3 minutes); (b) spokespt~rson for
groups (10 rninutes).
(6) Commission questions.
(7) Rebuttal by opposition (5 minutes).
(8) Final rebuttal by applicant or representative
(5 minutes).
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. Public Hearings continued from previous
meetings
8. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5481-
93 - Vacating 6' drainage & utility
easement lying in Lot 15, Tropic Hills Sub.
Unit 2, Blk E (Freeman V93-1 OHPW)
9. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5472-
93 - Vacating 5' sanitary sewer & utility
easement lying along the westerly side of
Lot 12 and in part of Lot 11, Carlouel Sub.,
Blk 266 (Athanasiou V93-11 )(PW)
10. Alcoholic Beverage Separation Distance
Variance for property (Ruth Eckerd Hall)
located at 1111 McMullen Booth Rd., Sec.
9-29-1 6, M&B 24.04 (PACT, Inc. AB93-
11 HPLD)
10/7/93
7. None.
8. Approved. Ord. #5481-93 passed 1 st
reading.
9. Approved. Ord. #5472-93 passed 1 st
reading.
10. Approved variance of 200' to allow an
alcoholic beverage use 100' from a
residential zone.
1
, ; ...., "..~~,~" i ;
,
'_,'I
11. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords.
#5448-93, #5449-93 & #5450-93 -
Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to
Low Density Residential and RS-6 Zoning
for property located at 2178 Burnice Dr.,
Glen Ellyn Estates, Lot 4, 0.24 acres m.o.1.
(Gary Warner TRE A93-19, LUP93-25)(PLD)
12. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords.
#5467-93, #5468-93 & #5469-93 -
Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to
Industrial Limited and I L Zoning for property
located at 2060-2066 Range Rd., NE 1/4
Sec. 12-29-15, Pinellas Groves Sub., part
of Lot 11,0.70 acres m.o.1. (Kehoe A93-
20, LUP93-27)(PLD)
13. (Cont. from 9/2/93) Public Hearing & First
Reading Ords. #5445-93, #5446-93 &
#5447-93 - Annexation, Land Use Plan
Amendment to Low Density Residential and
RS-6 Zoning for property located at 2345
Nursery Rd., SW 1/4 Sec. 19-29~16,
Pinellas Groves Sub., part of Lot 19,0.31
acres m.o.1. (Wagner A93-18, LUP93-
24)(PLD)
14. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords.
#5461-93 & #5462-93 - Land Use Plan
Amendment & Zoning for property located
at 601, 605 & 607 Orange Ave., Turner's
Third Add., Blk 12, Lot 4, Parcel A, LUP:
Public/Semi-Public & RM-12 Zoning AND
604 & 606 Bay Ave., Turner's Third Add.,
Blk 12, part of Lots 1 & 2, Parcel B, LUP:
Public/Semi-Public, OL Zoning, 0.50 acres
m.o.1. (Episcopal Church of the Ascension &
Ruth Willett LUP93-26, Z93-10)(PLD)
15. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords.
#5465-93 & #5466-93 - Land Use Plan
Amendment & Zoning for property located
at 1260-1266 Bay Parl<way, 300-322
Watkins Rd., 311 & 317 Pinellas St.,
Westover Sub., Blk 8, Lots 3-11, 15 & 16,
Parcel A, LUP: to Institutional & Z: to
Public/Semi-Public Planned Development
District AND 1263 Waters Ave. and 301-
309 Pinellas St., Westover Sub., Blk B, Lots
12-14 and Barnes Sub., Lot 4, Parcel B, Z:
to Public/Semi-Public Planned Development
District, 2.21 acres m.o.1. (Morton Plant
10/7/93
11. Approved. Ords. #5448-93, #5449-93 &
#5450-93 passed 1 st reading.
12. Approved. Ords. #5467-93, #5468-93 &
#5469-93 passed 1 st reading.
13. Approved. Ords. #5445-93, #5446-93 &
#5447-93 passed 1 st reading.
14. Continued to 10/21/93.
.: .
2
15. Continued to 10/21/93.
.. ",' ;., j ~-" I. 'Jf':.:'I~~'" "'<-rl~ ~'" ...to
,i
"
Hospital Association, Inc./Leonard & Gilotte
LUP93-28, Z93-11 )(PLD) - To be Continued
to 10/21/93
16. Approval of Downtown Development Plan 16. Approved. Ords. #5235-92, #5297-92,
& Periphery Area Plan - Second Reading of #5298-92, #5299-92, #5300-92 & #5302
the following Ordinances - Ords. #5297-92, adopted as amended; Ords. #5301-92,
#5298-92, #5299-92 & #5300-92 as #5303-92, #5304-92 & #5305-92
amended, amending future land use map adopted.
from various classifications to Central
Business District; Ord. #5301-92 -
amending zoning atlas from various
classifications to Urban Center (Transition);
Ord. #5302.92 - amending zoning atlas
from various classifications to Urban Center
(Transition); Ord. #5303-92 - amending
zoning atlas from various classifications to
Urban Center (Eastern Corridor); Ord.
#5304-92 - amending zoning atlas from
Public/Semi-Public to Urban Center
(Bayfront); Ord. #5305-92 - amending
zoning atlas from Public/Semi-Public to ,',
Urban Center (Core); & Ord. #5235-92, as '.
'.
amended, amending various sections of the
Land Development Code concerning the ..
Urban Center zoning district (PLD) "
..: .~
17. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5460- 17. Continued to 11/8/93. ..
93 - LDCA amending Secs. 44.08 & 44.54,
to allow temporary signs under certain
circumstances (PLD)
18. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5463- 18. Approved. Ord. #5463-93 passed 1 st .
93 - LDCA amending Sec. 42.21, to revise reading.
the requirements for nonconforming uses
on barrier islands to encourage compliance
with development and building regulations
including flood damage prevention
regulations (PLD)
19. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5464- 19. Approved. Ord. #5464-93 passed 1 st .
93 - LDCA amending Secs. 40.164, reading.
40.184, 40.204, & 40.224, to provide for
nursing homes as a conditional use in the
RM 16, 20, 24 & 28 zoning districts;
amending Sec. 41.053 to provide
supplementary conditional use standards for
such uses (PLD)
10/7/93
3
:,:' ','"
,. :.'
,,',. .....11
. ',,"';;
Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances
20. Public Hearings/Second Reading Ordinances 20. None.
continued from previous meetings
21. Ord. #5389-93 - Land Use Plan
Amendment to Commercial General for 21. Ord. #5389-93 adopted.
property located at 801, 803 & 805 Turner
St., Magnolia Park Sub., Blk 22, N 125' of
Lots 1 & 2 and Lot 3, approx. 0.53 acres
(Newport Oil Corp. LUP9 3-11 )
22. Ord. #5390-93 - CN Zoning for property 22. Ord. #5390-93 adopted. '.
located at 801 , 803 & 805 Turner St.,
Magnolia Park Sub., Blk 22, N 125' of Lots ' ~,
1 & 2 and Lot 3, approx. 0.53 acres
(Newport Oil Corp. 293-06)
23. Ord. #5405-93 - Land Use Plan 23. Ord. #5405-93 adopted as amended.
Amendment to Industrial for property
located along N r-o-w line of Seaboard
Coast Railroad, Sec. 1-29-15, M&B 34.27
and part of M&B 34.35 and Sec. 12-29-15,
part of M&B 21.01 (Instrument
Transformers LUP93-08) .,
24. Ord. #5406-93 - IL Zoning for property 24. Ord. #5406-93 adopted as amended.
located along N r-o-w line of Seaboard
Coast Railroad, Sec. 1-29-15, M&B 34.27
and part of M&B 34.35 and Sec. 12-29-15,
part of M&B 21.01 (Instrument .''"
",',
Transformers A9 3-0 6) ,,;
.' ,
25. Ord. # 540 8-93 - Land Use Plan 25. Ord. #5408-93 adopted as amended. "
Amendment to Commercial/Tourist Facilities
for property located at 2633 Harbor Circle,
Hill-Top Sub., Lots 8 & 9 (McNeill LUP93-
14)
26. Ord. #5409-93 - CG Zoning for property 26. Ord. #5409-93 adopted as amended.
located at 2633 Harbor Circle, Hill-Top
Sub., Lots 8 & 9 (McNeill A93-09)
27. Ord. #5439-93 - Land Use Plan 27. Ord. #5439-93 adopted as amended.
Amendment to Industrial for property
located South of Calumet St. & West of
Hercules Ave., Sec. 1-29-15, M&B 34.311
(Instrument Transformers LUP93-22)
28. Ord. #5440-93 - IL Zoning for property 28. Ord. #5440-93 adopted.
located South of Calumet St. & West of
Hercules Ave., Sec. 1-29-15, M&8 34.311
(Instrument Transformers A93-16)
10/7/93
4
29. Ord. #5459-93 ~ Relating to special 29. Ord. #5459-93 adopted as amended.
assessments; amending Secs. 27.01 thru
27. 13, to provide for special assessments
based upon area, value or other reasonable
bases to fund public works projects
specially benefitting property, defining
terms, revising notice and hearing
requirements
30. Ord. #5477-93 - CG Zoning for property 30. Ord. #5477-93 adotped.
located at 608 & 610 N. Garden Ave., G.L.
Bidwell's Oakwood Addition to Clwr, Lots
25 & 26, 0.32 acres m.o.1. (CNHS, Inc.
Z93-07 )
31. Ord. #5479-93 - 1992/93 Third Quarter 31. Ord. #5479-93 adopted.
operating budget
32. Ord. #5480-93 ~ 1992/93 Third Quarter 32. Ord. #5480-93 adopted.
capital improvement project budget
33.
Special presentations of widespread public interest
a) McMullen Booth &. Marlo Drive
a) Motion made to request the MPO & Pinellas
County to install emergency traffic light during
construction period for widening of McMullen
Booth Road. Motion made to take appropriate
action for "no right turn" on red on east bound
side of McMullen Booth & Enterprise Roads.
34.
Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda
Richard Hayworth requested approval for closure of Ft. Harrison for Church of Scientology event on
Friday, 8 p.m. to 1 a .m. Motion made to approve closure & for Church of Scientology to provide
adequate police coverage at their expense.
William Wallace complained regarding notification process for vacation applications. Requested
posting of sign on property and/or notification of property owners within 200' radius. Will be
agendaed for future discussion.
Bob Wright asked provision be made at Monday Commission meetings for public input on agenda
items. It was pointed out citizens are welcome to speak. Commissioner Thomas asked consideration
be given for "Citizens to be Heard" at Monday meetings.
Bob Clark complained regarding profits made from war. He felt gun owners should be licensed.
Steve Saliaa complained regarding cable rates and asked that "basic" service be defined. Questioned
if cable company can bill for something not approved by Commission. It was pointed out the City has
applied to set own rates.
Robert Harn resented having the name of Plaza Park changed.
Mayor Garvey invited public to Third Annual City Expo at Clearwater Mall, Friday, 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.
10/7/93
5
',\'
.::
, ..,':
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
35. Items continued from previous meetings
36. Marina Slip Rent increases, to be effective
11/1/93, Transient Vessels slip by 5 cents,
Private Pleasure Craft slip to $3.50 per foot
per month for Clearwater residents & to $4
per foot per month for non-residents, and
Commercial Boats slips based on the total
amount of passengers carried by the vessel
assigned to the slip or special purpose (MR)
37. Authorization to proceed with
advertisement of an RFP & begin selection
process re: feasibility study re: new FDOT
bridge at S.R.60 and the inland waterway
(PW)
38. Contract for construction of Solid Waste
Complex to C.A. Oakes Construction Co.,
Inc., Tampa, Fl, for $1 ,649,474.30; to be
financed with a 20-yr loan from city's
central insurance fund with 20 equal
principal payments of $82,473.72, together
with interest at the cash-pool rate, due on
9/30 of each year, beginning 9/30/94 (PW)
39. Receipt/Referral - Proposed lDCA re: minor
variances (LDCA 93-24)(PlD)
ITEM: Scientology Case
ITEM: Sun Bank Building Contract
40. Receipt/Referral - Proposed lDCA re:
prohibiting parking on grass or other
unsurfaced areas in multiple family and
nonresidential developments, unless
specifically permitted (lDCA 93-19 )(PLD)
41. Neighborhood Advisory Committee - 1
appointment (elK)
42. Planning and Zoning Board - 1 appointment
(CLK)
43. Airport Authority - 1 appointment (CLK)
44. Municipal Code Enforcement Board - 3
appointments (eLK)
10/7/93
35. None.
36. Continued to 10/18/93.
37. Approved.
38. Approved.
39. Received & Referred.
ITEM Set attorney/client session for 10/19/93 at
4:00 p.m.
ITEM Set meeting for 10/12/93 at 5:00 p.m.
40. Received & Referred.
41. Appointed Jonny Gammage.
42. Appointed Tony Salmon.
43. Reappointed Theresa Goss.
44. Appointed Tamara Shannon to complete
term to 10/31/95; Appointed Dennis.
Henegar & reappointed D. Wayne Wyatt.
6
.' ;~.\".'~'\^,~":.'l"'u.,...,:j',., j..\
; ;.-
45. Other Pending Matters
a) Rental Agreement with Dr. Paul and
Betty Jean Brown for city-owned property
at 1171-1175 Cleveland Street (PW)
b) Set October Town Meeting date
c) Set October Sign Variance Meeting date
';Y':g~;
. .,
,:,;~
45. a) Motion made to have rent paid in full for
period in advance; if not paid, start eviction
proceedings.
b) Set meeting for 10/28/93, 7:30 p.m.
c) Set meeting for 10/29/93, 11 :00 a.m. to
3:30 p.m.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
First Reading Ordinances
46. Ord. # 5478-93 - Creating Sec. 21 .1 5, to
prohibit practice of requesting payment in
exchange for "watching" a parked motor
vehicle with certain exceptions
47. Ord. #5452-93 - Vacating 10 foot
east/west alley lying south of Slk 12,
Turners Sub. No.3 & lying north of Slk 3,
Starr & Savery Sub. (Episcopal Church of
the Ascension, V93-08)
48. Ord. #5487-93 - amending Ord. #5386-93,
proposing city charter amendment to
establish a department to be known as The
General Accounting Office, providing for a
special election to submit this proposed
charter amendment to the voters, changing
date of special election from 11/2/93 to
1 /1 1 /94
46. Ord. #5478-93 passed 1 st reading.
47. Ord. #5452-93 passed 1 st reading.
48. Ord. #5487-93 passed 1 st reading.
49. Res. #93-60 adotped.
Resoluti ons
49. Res. #93-60 . Lot clearing
ITEM: Res. #93-54 - Authorizing City Manager
to execute subordination of utility interests
document with FOOT re: Parcel 800.02 declared
surplus on 9/14/93
50. Other City Attorney Items
a) 2nd Amendment to easement agreement
with Florida Power re: Stag Run Blvd.
b) 6' drainage and utility easement, Tropic
Hills Unit 2, SI k E, Lot 1 5
(Heitzman/Freeman)
c) (Cont. from 10/4/93) Legal Department
Com puters
10/7/93
ITEM Res. #93-54 adopted.
50. a) Approved.
b) Approved.
c) Motion made to proceed forward in line
with budget.
7
;,. ".<.... ..
:" ,
",',
'.' ,'j
o'
, .
:.',
, '.
',.
',: ~
'-i
.1, .".
'fp
':':;
'-;
I:. ".
51. City Manager Verbal Reports 51. None.
52. Commission Discussion Items 52. Continued less Items e & j.
a) Single, can of cold beer purchase at gas
stations
items b thru r are all Cont. from 10/4/93
., .
b) Commissi on Rules . .
c) N. Greenwood Association request re: "
Plaza Park
d) naming and renaming of parks
e) Seville/Zorn Development e) No action taken.
f) State transfer of roads to local
governments
g) Keene Road
h) Citizen volunteers
i) Removal of art colony signs
j) Rare environmentally sensitive land j) Staff directed to come back with definition.
k) Water Treatment
I) Public Libraries re: # of items checked out
m) Parking around the Pinellas County
Utilities Building
n) Re-Iandscaping of Welcome Center
0) Countryside Day - Spring of 1994 -
Second Annual
p) Fee Agreement with Snell Isle Properties,
Inc.
q) COSG Funding Levels
r) Budget Advisory Committee
recommendations
s) Tracking Items
t) Code Enforcement Certification
53. Other Commission Action 53. None.
54. Adjournment 54. 12:06 a.m. (10/8/93)
8
"I' ',to
. . ..'
. . ',' ".,,~ ',. "1. j.3,
r :'
-
.., ,:' '.
>.,
..,.'>.. '. ,.
., ',.::;" ''':'' '.' '~'. ':': ;' . ,':<'" ':"; Pi ",':~": ,{.j/:"~::I-::=I;:':'~;;: :;;{\r~;lf '.
, .' ..C,l?
"~':~;!}
',,~, h
~'\~
'. -:.
",
.>
~" "
",-"'it
""{
..
."
" 't
..
: "
; t
!;
.
""..! "
l' . .~
h\~~'-:
f
.
;
'.. '.' ,'.'>':'.:
. ,'.~f);:;,',~,;;:f"
;, '. .' .,,' .,;'S '.;'~'L
, .' ~ ; .;,.,': }, .....;
. ":', !r' ':,~~ ','" ,
i '. .' .,~.tL\,.;r;;' '.
',; ! ';';" .:,:;;.;';;:\ ;.\!,:: '
".: ." _'A;' .1.~_l; . .,'-' '...,..... ~ ~,-.r CC>~
~.. "
,',;;
" " '.,'
I .~1,
.,:
<",' ". ......"
:::,,:.' ...,<;~,.:~{, '/.l
:..,::." .:d~~
"
_ ~ J.", ,..~
tl' 1 .' l~ ."
: #~ 1~
..
.. t ~', "'. __.
,:
.'.
,
I'
",
"
~ '.
:/{~
",:;
..., .i
C IT Y OF C LEA R W ATE R
I nterdepartmental Correspondence
'.'
',".,;;
.' .'.;
..',.'
~\<~
,),
.' ';,"
.<~
.. ;,::~~i$1
.' "{! ,.1'
"::';i
,c"
..
":.)-
TO:
Mayor Garvey
FROM:
Sally Thomas, Agenda Clerk
SUBJECT:
Invocation
COPIES:
Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk
',",
,/
i;i
.,' ",:i,'
. . ,.:./,
. " :.;
.,: '.':;
, 'if
':." ::
: :,i . c.'.
.:.: ~;.:(:;ifl
.....,;, ,t.r;_
:'.,""';:1;\.
';:':',:::){{..
, " h''', :)"
, " '. ';';:.:',
~', .::: ~
,,'" ,:':;
, ,,;,: :\:f;.,,':":',;,'~>.5:i:,.,/:': ,;: ",~~ ;~I
" .. ":;.';:; . :,:~;,::':,:;., .;"',.>
, :',<:: _ ':.;~';f.'~' :" ";~'~:;.'
'<'. ';:', ":,,:....r. \':..:"
. .' ,';.:: ..- , ',-.t..!?;""
>,:::::":L '... .:'
. !:,....",:.:....' .: .;.~:~:'~II
'. . - < .' ,.~' c. "" ..... )?'1' ,;
.,.. ....,. ''! ':"',';':":"";
, ,',.:", '",' ",/,>.,.;:::-
. ': '. . . >:,0/:.'\":",;::
. .... " ..' ;: :.'::';;""~::'~;:{:<i'..
':, ,<'i'" ....:'.' '. . i -""~;;;' ':\,:,;,: .. ',.'. :i:,:
," ". .. :"i"": ',.., :":,;.... '. :.' i' . : .;, .
.. ":: . ."oi.':,,' ;' ';';," :.: .::;;
, ':;:\',':':, . :',U~:~\>' .' :\,;';,:" ';;:.:'i' /::-r,';g~.
.:~\:::"::..;i!: ',. ..:';..,!:, .:;,~: ":f,' ',". :'~'
.' , ", .... ...:.: .;.:;i~' ...f ':., ;\', :.' '.' .c ,.:,':'
, , ,',';. 'jJH'< "~;;C' ;i.;<:,';, ,...,':".c; ,.'
" ,..;';'::" '. 1.}:::<:.:,.::>:;, ":i,
;. ", ." .:... '.! ":"""'" :" . ',:;. ,'.;:; ',: ':':'/,:'.,>: :.....,. : ':
. ;,",;",; ..;: ,'; :..... .' ;";i:"" ,:'::"','.::.::' ~
'C:..:~ :.'.,:;':: :;., . ',;;i.;.:; ..'. ::,:.,':'
'.':'/ ';.:' ,\:::r>: :~,;}::::. ,.<,,:,.
" , : ,:.) ",,";:,>n;:~~~,:,: '" ''',ni;:A~\, "'"
. ';...., ,i'.. ;?,:i, ~,:,:-,,::.,!).,:, '^,""""i,"' ."
, ..:' ~ , .' ,'..\ ''';: '~;',';;' ".:'. .. ii,:
.,.: " , '.' .::.,. .\:y ;;( ,;:;1:;!
" '; . 0 '.,; ""1::'H~; '2",:, ;x:,.~.;;{ . ;
, . ,: " ">'C/'" :- '::;;;'S"
, " ' : . '. . , ':':~o:/L?:,
. ^'.. ..,.' " : .:;;:.y
" . ,'''':j.
'. ..../ ",".<.;:; :: ":';'{:'\ ':'..:,' ....
. . .,,...., ':" '; '.:<:, ',;'. ': ,'".
'. .... .'. . , '.. ~:::: ,'.'.,..,', : ';:,,, :0" ':. ...;,.i; ;:
, ".~. ".. .... . ....';::, . ";:,' .:,';::':;:,:\;F:;....;<i',;):."~'. ..::,
, .. ':.:,','" '". r,:;;;':;'~}' >~:-)i:;"i~:",(:" '''::c'::':::';
," "." J:~_:.>;;";.: ' >., -: ~',;
" ., c .' ..:'" ;"q'..,~: c:.,,"i:; .:; '!!:;.~'>: c;.' .,.'>;,
.', " "': ';i:e" . '.:'i'::;' ":. .,.,,'. ,;.:
, .' ..., .. ',';',;' " ';'
. ...:. '::". :;-)'t::"'.;,"; :;;:~ ,~:::,':,.y(;>~':, . ',<;:i(';,:.':;'>i';~
, ':'.',',' .,'.' :...,,.,0:: ' . '"
. .' :'", :.:\:. ,..' ',.{.:/:y~.><'" . . , ".
, :".:., ,':: ,'<,:..:." ,,' ,}:;~
" ',.:,
':/:
,;,
DATE:
October 7, 1993
Tonight's invocation will be given by Reverend Thurman Rivers, Skycrest United
Methodist Church, 2045 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 34625
"
" ".<
,"- "
: : ::,' ,,: .:.>.: ,
."":":/"";~".< ,<,' '. ,
...... ():;:'...,/;,:;:"':; :
":'::'l~";;!: <;~"',:,
,,' ~ :~",~' '.~ '1, '
,,<;,
'" 1 "
" "
-; '.
'.:.' '. ~
....
...'." .",
'.H<:.:x[;~::::'; "'.. .
'.,':':,:', :..;:HN!?,",~", "",'
, .' ,,:,';';",:0; . , , ".., ,.' ,
.....,:0::',,'.': <";,.'c'" ......
.),':,:>.::'/!.';:.;.;,.,.. . '. ,'..
,~i
.' "
J .'
.- )
,.
,. ;
-,'J.'":
'. ""/',ii"\i(.,
'" iL.:;',;.... '"
, . :',' :'~ , )' ';', : ,- ,.. " . c:: '
. .'
,J
t
,1\
'. ":~
" ." '.
.... ..."...;,. ':". ....
".~ . '.
,.'
:
..: l ~'. :,.,. :...:~..;"' ~, ;'.. ~,..\.::~; ,,>~~<;;),:.i~;j~~t::;1~Al;'~:i'}i:'~~':J,t:;,~::.:~'j~~:1 ,:f....:'~.~.~~~::,.";.;;X
'j '-
'.. ~..
"\
TO:
Mayor Rita Garvey
; , :'~
FROM:
Betty J. Blunt, Confidential Clerk Receptionist
','I
COPIES:
City Commissioners, Michael Wright, Cyndie Goudeau
SUBJECT:
Presentations at the October 7, 1993 City Commission Meeting
DATE:
October 7, 1993
The following presentations will be made at the October 7, 1993 City Commission meeting.
CITATION
Bruce Littler, Marine Advisory Board
'.,., ':,
"".."
".... ,'i;'.,
.....j -
~ .'
,
,
.";
.,,J
,
:~1
1
. .
AGENDA
. t'.
DATE
to
1~ 9!J
,
;-\:
...
. :~,
iTEM
#J
+wrl
"1
Item #
CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION
Agenda Cover Memorandum
cg.
Meeting Date
{O/'7/93
SUBJECT: Vacation Request 93-10 ( Freeman )
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the vacation of the 6.0 foot Drainage & utility
Easement lying in Lot 15, Block "E" Tropic Hills Subdivision unit 2 and pass
Ordinance No. 5481-93 on first reading.
BACRGROUND:
The applicant has a pool and deck which encroach 6.0 feet into an existing 6.0
foot Drainage & utility Easement. The City has no existing utilities within this
easement. The house and a screened porch were built in 1963 and were permitted
in the county. Tropic Hills Subdivision units 1 thru 4 were annexed on November
1, 1979.
This petition has been reviewed by various City departments/divisions concerned
with vacations and there are no objections to this vacation. The Engineering
Department has no objection to vacating the 6.0 foot easement provided a new 6.0
foot replacement easement is approved by the city and recorded by Pinellas
County.
Florida Power has no objection provided that the power pole located on the North
side of the lot remains accessible to Florida Power corporation. General
Telephone and Vision Cable have no objections to this vacation.
The Public Works Director has reviewed the comments submitted by the reviewing
Departments and recommends approval of this item. The replacement easement has
been examined by City staff and appears as a separate item of this meeting
( October 7, 1993 ).
I
I Reviewed by: Originating Dept. Costs: N/A Commission Action
I Public Works/Engineering
I Legal N/A &JriY (Current FY) Approved
I
I Budget N/A Funding Source: Approved
User Dept.
I Purchasing w/conditions _____
N/A Capt. Imp.
Denied
I Risk Mgmt. N/A Advertised: Operating
Cont'd to
I DIS N/A Date: 09/23 & 09/30/93 Other
I
I ACM N/A Paper: Tampa Tribune Appropriation cOde(s)-----1
Attachments:
I Other N/A Not required I
N/A I Petition
I
Affected parties I Ordinance
'I notified Yes I Location Sketch
I Sketch of new easement
I I
Not required I
I I
VAC0310.AGN
.> ..'
! .
.
Vacation Number 93-10
"Freeman"
v ~ c ~ T ION R E QUE S T
PRO C E S SIN G SHE E T
PLEASE REVIEW THIS VACA'rION IN rfERNS OF YOUR PRESENT USE AND FUTURE NEED
FOR THE PROPERTY. INDICATE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW:
REFERENCE ATLAS SHEET NO 309D/' 1-14 SECTION 19 TOWNSHI 29S RANGE 16E
1. ENGINEERING D~ISION: /Y'" /'" '
REVIEWED BY: V<\ '(V\C~ APPROVED BY:J#;!?~('( ,'~?:k- DATE: 8/11/13
COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting the ca'o of the
full 6.0 foot Dra inage & ut il i ty Easement ly:t- gang the East
side of Lot 15, Block "E", Tropic Hills l1nit 2. 'rhe pool
encroaches 6.0 feet into the easement. The city has no
existing utilities wi thin the easement. The Engineering
Division has no objection to vacating the 6.0 foot Drainage &
utility Easement provided a new 6.0 foot Drainage & utility
replacement Easement is granted to the city in return.
Florida Power has no objection to this vacation request
provided the pole on the North side of the property remains
accessible. General Telephone, V~sion Cable have 110 objection
to this vacation request.
2 .
~//, / c;.,
PLANNING & DE~ELOPMENT:
REVIEWED BY~.~~~PPROVED BY
COMMENTS:
Zoned RS-8. Assuming the pool was.per " tted with n
~btpr8B~~~V~lth-request. Required setbacks for the subject pool
'are: 25 ft. street;: 5 ft.; and 5 ft. (as per current requirements
which have been in effect since 1985).
DATE:
3 .
, c~~..
~~~~~~~g ~~~P~~~~g~~D BY: _1 ~ L~ '-'
COMMENTS:
No record of a permit. Will'require engineer's certification that
meets requirements of the Pool and Electrical Code.
the pool
DArrE: 08/23/93
AMENDED:
~
September 8, .1993
Records show pool permit was issued September 17, 1980. The only inspection
record was pool deck bonding. The screen enclosure perm.j.t was issued on
August 14, 1980. See no point in requiring any additional inspections at
this time.
No objections to the vacation request.
..
Page 1 of 4
'.~. ::'::";::~
}~
'f. .
,"',;<
,.f
,i
. "
y',',':;
'.,.J .
, .
Vacatipn Number 93-10
"Freeman"
4.
GAS DEPARTMENT :/' /1J . /' # A.-fl-~
REVIEWED BY:,..<. U/~;/ APPROVED BY:~ I D'ATE:~/1.~!'rJ
CONMENTS: I . ~ -c..o..,.. \
1\./ CI Co I'"" ?c " 0.......
5.
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
COMMENTS:
Dr(
;)~~
DATE:
J/~Cr?::J
~------------------------------------------------------------~----
PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
09/23/93
10/07/93
AND
09/30/93
ADVERTISING DATE:
(
COMMISSION ~CTION: ----APPROVED----CONTINUED----TABLED----DENIED---- .' , .
ORDINANCE NO.
DATE OF ADOPTION
RECORDED IN O. R. BOOK:
PAGE:
LETTER TO PROPERTY OWNER ADVISING COMPLETION OF VACATION
VACATION CARD FILE:
SHEET 2 OF 4
REVISED 11/90
VACPROC3.DDM
/.
, j'.
:.. ,Co
, ..;
.f
.
.
-
," .
f'
. .
.....
.
V A CAT ION' R E 0 U EST
F I L IN G
FOR M
1.
f!j'Ti<i~ I it Ie /-~t3c 4111-/\/ PHONE: >f("-J~6t
1J3/ ~1/~r<6-LI1-j),zS /r)t/rZ LLtiIlI<WA'IRt<- FC. iY~:x;/
NAME:
ADDRESS:
,"
'"
HEREBY PETITION THE CI'rY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE
VACATION OF THE FOLLOWING:
I Yl EASEMENT TYPE: ()~/IINI\~~ f tA TIt/1j
RIGHT-OF-WAY
~ .
'1' .
. .!
ff','
" .
. .
ALLEY
OTHER:
. ,
t.....:.
2~
I~ ' .
. :.>!.-:.." "
,it,,""
!, ~:~i .:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED:' ,f'';:/
........ ,
iks c J:. ,i T;"vr-.. . /0}, it.; A
..~.. ~~. r' ;1..'
:.:'~H;/j/.
.~::,\1lV,i ~ :.
.'(~<!1'1....:: :'
. ,~I.~~~:\..;iI.;
....~~'t~tI'v.. .
." ;'::'r1tl~::' J "
. ":;i:';ig~'>;
;,: 'ljll:~' · !:
:11:~~,/:';,':':. .:'
. ,\'1 r:,~,I,..
.:......'.r.r"...',
t : ~I\t ,.t~'t'.;.o, ."
: "'l,I'/.1:i:: '.
" 1.-,,', \ ~ f.'.. \..
. ;:. "{l:";;l;."~ /; '; I
... 'il,1Ji:j'.'{~": ,
. *: : ';~';f:;.'I'.~ ';. ,I
. .\:~,:'~'r~'i.:'
:f t I ,.~~l;.;.. ..,Jl . .
':', ,1,1.~'~~~ ~r~.
:,' ,,;:} r~~~'ll .. .... .
: ':I :~'f . '. ~,
. l'/lt">" ri'ii', :..
; tt~:":~1:, ",' #
.' ;:"~)!;';"i<;"
. ",, "'Ii' I b j' I
I .'"jj :t~l t .'. >,' 1 f
" :,.}lr' .'.~'.O I I ".'
", ..... ,_" n~.'
" . r~~u"f't' .
. It::i""
",_;' . . .' I
s:z ~
f I<t? f {) St21;>
)IJ- T r J;'C Il e b S 1-1/2/./ .(J Y (-
t.. FT fATIL/TY G/l52dJL~
3.
STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION:
1;).91 bt/ lEI<. ;_ LAi) e' 5 () (/ e
CLel1t<.J"uIt-/&C FL -516;;1~
,4.
PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY:
fooL
5~~;(t?eN t3NcLoJuRe
'f
'. , ~ "
,I, : .
. ! ,'1
. , ,
5 .
ZONING ON ADJOINING PROPERTY:
~;; ~
Page 3 0 f 4
t';:
'.'
.' .
, .
.
.
.
~- .
6. ATTACHMENTS:
LAND SURVEY OF PROPERTY IS REQUIRED IF THIS VACATION INVOLVES
EXISTING ENCROACHMENT
---
DRAWING SHOWING PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY
(SURVEY~ PLOT PLAN, ETC.)
X SEE RESOLUTION 82-3 (ATTACHED)
ATTACHED LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION FROM:
X FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
X GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
:it VISION CABLE
~ OTHER
> .
,.
f
" "
7 '.
SIGNA'rURE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING THAT
TO BE VACATED: (APPLICANT)
t, t
,; ,I.'.
PROP ERT1i/~ROPOS ED
.;. I,:,IJ~ ~
rh'/I;' ,
.; \:~:',"~~~." t
. )"1 .
ACQtl!RED
::'W':,;
J. ~..\; II
before me this
and who did
'~""'" J..)
take an oath.
, . ..:/'/::..;>0'
who is personal y JcnoW~:l~J~~.; me ....
." : I ~~!..'. . I, .
Rllh, l:r. as id~H~~riication
~ . ;\,:,j!~~:~::').:;i;.
"l'.4i'::'l"'::;
.' ,. .;.:'.1," lIt q
. ..j;l::! ~,.' >~I
t', t' 'Ii'~!' !~". '
'. ." .,~ t.~t ~.:.
: '!";".i' ,;/.;: "
Notary Public, Commission No. . ~ c.!)S7tf!L(:,
produced
F'(P5'5-.IoJ'R' -. S-/ -S-f9
. r
_ Lf;<J~h~
I
'.,
(Name of Notary typed, printed orstarnped)'
IARBARA K. EVES
Notary Publlc-Stata or Florldo
MyComml~on Expires DEC 14.1995
Comm # CC 159846
SHEET 4 OF 4
ENG. DEPT. 3/82
REVISED 10/92
VJ\CRF:Q.DDH
\-
I, ~
'-' ~
~
~ I 6LoC-\,< "E"
\Ii'F.e,..,:!J 0
ill jiZ..L'~" , g 1,:C.4' 1'/; H
:) 11~9
2, I."'. It . "2
Lu
l\J
> ~
~ a l.l 2};).0
~ '!
~ UI In .J
):
W ~ () .11
0 !
a :: 2. ~
:s ~ f
"- IS' t"'"
~ r 0 t\\
..s-- II 0
~ 010 N
~\I 8 ~ 0
cS \f)
co
4'',<...t''
p.c."".
Pol-? ,M.
"
LIBERTY FINANCIAL MORTGAGE CORP.
STEWART FIDELITY TILTE CO.
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY co.
w.o. , 254zh
..
CER.TlrlCQ TO:
t..
OASIS or BEMINes: A<S PG.~ F'LAT
"1'i30UrJ DAr<'-I Surz.VE.,-/"
ROBIN J. PATTON
THOMAS G. WALDIE
SEC.~ ,TWP. ~9 S..~GE.~E.
T
"
Bre. (;' l-J-rW 00 0 ~I " E
U>' P,AVE/-lE./<TT
(. (,(> . f-{.w)
"BOUNDA.RY SURVEY"
. ;
A SURVEY OF LOT 15 , BLOCK "E" , TROPIC HILLS UNIT 2 ,
TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF TRACT A , WHICH LIES EAST OF
LOT 15 , BLOCK liE" AND LYING BETWEEN THE HORTH /\NO SOUTl-t
BOUNDARIES OF LOT 15 , BLOCK "E" , EX'l'ENDED EASTERLY TO THE
INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT A , .ACCORDING
TO THE 'MAP OR PLAT THEEROF A.S RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 58 ,
PAGE 5 OF TilE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY , Fr..ORIDA.
.
,
I, DENNIS J. EYRE, THE SURVEYOR IN RESPONSIBLE CIlARGE. CERTifY THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON AS
MEETING TIlE I,AINIMUM TEcHNICAL STANDARDS SET rORTH BY THE F'LORIDA BOARD or LAND SURVEYORS. PURSUMH
TO SECTION 472.027, or THE rLORIDA STATUTES (AS PRESCRIBED IN RlJLES 21HH-6, DEPT. or PROfESSIONAL
REGULATION), (NOT V^LIO UNLESS SEALED Y,ITH AN EMBOSSED SliRVEYOR'S SEAL.)
IC;~~~b o~~C71l~=r B~: t~C~:>J ~t~L7.~~) ~~~,y~~..tu:v, OtNtll~AAl(
r.l,R, . rOUllO IRON ROO; 5.IR, . Sf 1 mOil ROO; S,N 0, . SO HAll" DISle: r.C,u. . rOUND CONCRClt U~UU[NT; P.R.LI. . PERU,wC/lI RErERtNC[ UOllUUtNTI
P.C.P, . Ptllll~N[NT COOltno\' POIIII: P,\, . 1'0111 or IIlI[MlClIO>1; 1I/W . ",CHl-or-W~Y; r,H.O, _ rOUND NAIL' DISK: CONC, . CONCRETE: COY. . COI.1:RCO:
AsPlt, . .SPIlI<\ 1: r.l:c. . 'lC"O'I; TIlof'. . 1 OINS' III'; RCt. . R~~Ir.C; IIlV. - nCYAnOll; PVUT. - P~V(II[NI: C.D.S. - CO>ICRCT! BLOCK SIRUCTURC:
r,C.I,R, . rOlmo CApPCD IRO" ROO; ~' . I'IAI; I.l ~ U[ASUnEO; 0 . OW); r,l.p. - rOUND IRON PIPC
;
,
i I
,
....-
DRAWN BY:
lL,cG.
CHECKED 8'1':
o.j". ~,
," 1.
ORDINANCE NO. 5481-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
VACATING THE 6-FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LYING
IN LOT 15, BLOCK E, TROPIC HILLS UNIT 2; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it has been requested by Patricia K. Freeman, the owner of certain
real property located in the City of Clearwater, that the City vacate the
drainage and utility easement described herein; and
WHEREAS, the C; ty Commi 5S ion finds that sa i d easement is not necessary for
municipal use and it ;s deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the
general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
See t ion i. The f 0 11 ow i n 9 :
The 6-foot drainage and utility easement lying .in Lot 15, Block E,
Tropic Hills Unit 2, according to the map or plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 58, Page 5, of the public records of Pinellas
County, Florida,
;s hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater quitclaims and
releases all of its right, title and interest thereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public
records of Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. Th;s ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
.-',j
:.',1
:' ':',~J
"
"';:1'
'":}l
. i,
. 1-.
I ...
o 'J
.
LL1
>.
<(
~,
~o
"
15
en
w
c
<(
...J
(!)
0::
W
>
W
Requested Vocafion
by Applicanf
BRENTWOOD
Note f This is . not 0 SURVEY
~ .
~
VV
~' c
d)E
QI
ClI III
O'C
gw
"0 >. I
..-
0:.::
-\D 5 I
~
~
"::JCO
<0-
q.
N
-
-
-i.f.
..
-
cv
6'
~
,~
~~
j....
o ..
\..1
4:
~
.
-.-
o
SCALE & N .T. S.
DR.
"Freemon"
Vac. No.: 93-/0
Section. /9 - 29 -16
Drawn by: D.D.M,
Date: 8/26/93
. ..
_.__ '_L'
. .' ,:'
, u:I'
,< ':,~;.
" .
, .. t ~.. ..
SEC.2.2.
TWP.~S,RGE:!!-E.
"SKETCH OF LEGAL"
: ~,
\~
\
/0
P'~'~ ~
.:.$' ,g 9 ~ ;. " 1'...;';' ,&'
'\3 / ~_ < I'L'tr'
/00,00' 1-===1- .~I','& ' t'(
~ b0' J~j ~
\ 'I;) '0,1 \~if I " '.
~. ,
() :; I~ ,..; I ) : ..
> ~ ~~\ ~
't tQ r-..
(..) ~ /'/" r .,..., _c(~ tr
~ .
, ~ \ ,
0
'" l '~\ \ ~
\~ ~ ~
C ~ /5 ~ Q
-9 \ - \ ~
t ~ \ \\\ ~ ~.
~
~
, \ ~,\ "
~ i" <:::l
1\ . \
~ \j \ \ \ ~
\\J , ~ ~
II) \ ~ \ .
t;;)
). \ ~.. ~
~ ( .,.0 :.l
\ ).;
."",c. ~o'
I' .J (). 1'1"
L I'G.o'-
.', IY 89"
/ J ' ,/ 1_ " '-"""
,lJ /2. t:' N ;r v-I 0 0 J;>
j)~/VE
DESCRIPTION FOR A PROPOSED 6.0 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT
~ -
BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 , BLOCK "E" ,
TROPIC HILLS UNIT 2 , AS RECORDED IN PLAT nOOK 58 PAGE 5 OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FDORIDA ,:FORNTSBE
POINT OF B~GINNING OF SAID 6.0 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT , RUN
THENCE S 0 51'06" W , ALONG THE CENTER&INE OF SAID 6.0 FT.
EASEMENT, 12.00 FT. , THENCE RUN S 13 59117" E , ALONG
SAID CENTERLINE OF EASEMENT, 70.32 FT. TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
TRACT "A" , OF SAre TROPIC HILLe UNIT 2 , AND END OF SAID
EASEMENT. SAID POINT LIES N 89 13'12" W , 12.96 FT. FROM THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "A".
JULY 7 , 1993.
DYl
~':.:1
ALLIED URVEYING
2124 SUNNYDALE BLVD.
CLEARWATER , FLORIDA
34625
, P. L .5 . t 2865 ;. ;H~Jl-' '~"
I". .:. t.~;,,_........:~1k .
. .:>...... ';,. \~ ...~....
!e~'" c...'.1 ~\. ~..." "
. ". "I". ~iI,. ...'. '.
_",': ~ ...., .#J l. :'..~ .. ..'
" .. &.a '~"I~f .... I'..
~ '....:.- '.:" '-~ ,.,
. "1"'.. ".;:, .. '"4 ";' ~O:t' .... ~,""':"
, ~. ..}~.,';Z."r. , .
':"" )i....'L:~. .~~.:~.
., . .;. .......~i\C .
:J
I
'.';1
' ,
.. ......
....,.. 1~...I'.
NOTEl THIS I~ NOT A BOUND~RY SURVEY
;. ,., ~ ',. .' .;1
<~l
Item #
CLEARWATER C~TY COMMISSION
Agenda Cover Memorandum
'* R<\Jlsed
9
Meeting Date
/D/'7/r3
SUBJECT: Vacation Request 93-11 ( Athanasiou )
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the vacation of the 5.0 foot Sanitary Sewer and
utility Easement lying along the Westerly side of Lot l~nd in part of Lot 11,
Block 266, Carlouel Subdivision and pass Ordinance No. 5472-93 on first reading.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant would like to erect a concrete wall within this easement along the
rear of the property. The City has no existing utilities within this easement
nor any future plans for use of this easement.
This petition has been reviewed by various city departments/divisions concerned
with vacations and there are no objections.
Florida Power, General Telephone and Vision Cable have no objections to this
vacation.
The Public Works Director has reviewed the comments submitted by the reviewing
Departments and recommends this request be approved.
Reviewed by: Originating Dept. Costs: N/A COOIIIi 5S i on Act i on
Public Yorks/Engineeri 9
Legal N/A (Current FY) Approved .<
Budget N/A User Dept. Funding Source: Approved ".
w/conditions _____
Purchasing N/A Capt. Imp.
Denied
Risk Mgmt. N/A Advertised: Operating
Cont1d to
DIS N/A Date: 09/23 & 09/30/93 Other
ACM N/A Paper: Tampa Tribune
Appropriation Code(s) Attachments:
Other N/A Not required
N/A Petition
Affected parties Ordinance
notified Yes Location Sketch
Not required
VAC0311.AON
<. :
';'";.. . ..'
\ .
Vacation Number 93-11
"Athana-siou"
V A CAT ION R E Q J EST
PRO C E S SIN G S lEE T
PLEASE REVIEW 'rHIS VACATION IN TERMS OF YOUR RESENT USE AND FU'rURE NEED
FOR THE PROPERTY. INDICATE YOUR COMMENTS BE' OW:
REFERENCE ATLAS SHEET NO 238~1 B-3 SECTION 3~TOWNSHIP 2SS RANGE lSE
1. ENGINEERING D~ISION: ~ '
REVIEWED BY: U<~ Y'l\o.J-<.....-, APPROVED BY: ../.:. w~'t;> ~ ~~ DATE: b-'!1'1/C;3
COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting the ac on of the .
full 5.0 foot Sanitary Sewer & utility Ea e lying along
the Westerly side of Lot 12, Block 266, aria Subdivision.
The applicant wants to build a 6 foot m sonry wall along his
property. 'rhe city has no ex isting ti 1 i ties within the
easement. The Engineering Division has no objection to
vacating the 5.0 foot easement. Fl r ida Power, General
Telephone, and Vision Cable have no obje tion to this vacation
request.
2.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMEN3:
REVIEWED BY:~ ~~J" -APPROVED BY:
COMMENTS:
~ DATE: V/"ifq~
No problem with request. The property
setbacks are as follows: 25 ft. stree
rear. A 6 ft. high wall is permitted
(max. height of fence/wall within this
is zoned RS-8. Required
; 5 ft. side; and 10 ft.
ithin a rear yard as~'shown..
yard) .
BUILDING INSPECTION:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED
COMMENTS:
3.
DATE: 08/23/93
No problem, however, a permit will be
o build the wall.
Page 1 of 4
:'"N.
,~ ~ ':1: ;., ;:, ~.,
".; :
:-','
','1",'; ,.1
p'
,I '.: ". :
~:' : ..
. .
. ,;
;,.:,'!
, ,"
. ..., '
'. ,', ,{
" ,.".':,: .;
',t
.;.~"." '.~ ~>';".~',
Vacatxon Number 93-11
"Athanasiou"
4 .
GAS DEPARTMENT: BY:%~~! J1~:,:
REVIEWED BY: :.;>~ Q..4 APPROVED 'ttp;tr()-CI'~
COMMENTS:
--- '
DATE: 0 ?/lr, /1 J
. '^-' Q 0 T?:. ".':> t5 elr C).....J .
5.'
~UBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
COMMENTS:
6.1:
U~
DATE:
~ -'c~ ?/z'Y":7G
',;.' '
'.
..
,-'.,
. .
------------------------------------------------------~-~-----.----,
ADVERTISING DATE:
09/23/93
10/07/93
AND
09/30193
PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
COMMISSION ACTION:----APPROVED----CONTINUED----TABLED----DENIED----
ORDINANCE NO.
DATE OF ADOPTION
RECORDED IN o. R. BOOK:
PAGE:
LETTER TO PROPERTY OWNER ADVISING COMPLETION OF VACATION
VACATION CARD FILE:
.'
SHEET 2 OF4
REVISED 11/90
VACPROC3.DDM
.' '.' " ;... ',: ..~ "
,.
,.
,
,
',Ct,_
"
~'
:.;.
':.. ,
! .r
'.
,'.
'.'
, :"'.,'!':~':~', .,.." '
',1
"
,f}.~~-!' ",' ,. '0,':';;'
..,: .
. .
,.
, .
.
Y-~ CAT I 0 ~ 'R E 0 U EST
F I L I N G FOR M
1. NAME: blL.l. A-1-~~.sL~{) PHONE: yVt. /7)/7
ADDRESS: 3-.:l.:L. (7381 C~9A)(3.D~ ;)0; C,/e'A'rlf,..)r:rr6/?.
HEREBY PETITION TIlE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CI'rY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE
VACATION OF 'rHE FOr.../LOWING:
~ EASEMENT ~YPE: ~/?Y. SCiJo<. f lJT;t17Y
I RIGHT-OF-WAY
<
,f.!.'
"
ALLEY
I
I OTHER:
.;;'
2 .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF
77!rt; S ~o'r
310c k. ;ze. (,
.s~,,, \/ ~',Y
J. tE (. At..' 'lrf;1r Ile,l )
. I .
PROPERTY TO BE VACATED:
,:S:~Nlr"~';~y .s:.w..'/'- i 0'; r(\~y
...l'L... ".1.....L... ,
/I tJ D I-h,.~' r c"' ; ,_. ('I"" / / .
l,Ne...
tN,
L.. <, -to I' (_:
C..; ..~\ 'G t" -'1V'..C.N'''-
. (S (= ('
" I .
,
3. STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION:
99 tj 8/i'l CsplJ)A.Jr:)'De / /rV C"7/2L.Ot../(!..LSU(;, ell v I S 10' J-.j
,4. P~OPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY:
~. Crf Co.rJcre7'c,- (,locJc (~II\..hSI(~])) tJAl.:..L
I 5. ZONING ON ADJOINING PROPERTY:
?s- ~
Page 3 of tl
'. '....~.. ;:' > : j:' . :'.' '7 ' '
;',
"
!..,; t .
1<
. ;
. .
6 . ATTACHMENT S :
LAND SURVEY OF PROPERTY IS REQUIRED IF THIS VACATION INVOLVES
EXISTING ENCROAClIIv1i::NT
DRAWING SHOWING PROPOSED USE OF VAC1VrED PROPERTY
( SURVEY I PLOT PIJAN, ETC.)
X SEE RESOLUTION 82-3 (ATTACHED)
ATTACHED LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION FROM:
" "
X FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
X GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
X VI S10l-7 CABLE
OTHER
7~ SIGNATURE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING THA~' PROPERTY PROPOSED
TO BE VA~~ED: 1 (APPLICANT)
NAH~b,JL ;j JIu:uUJ(J lt2.I.(J\Dr(i!,E81LfL:!J. P COD_E DATE PROPERTY ACQUIRED
97V'L~~o/ C~~o?J ;j)..-jd~JI1/CI? / ~~/- 9~
... I ....
STATE OF FLORIDA) \
COUNTY OF P1NELLAS)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~f ~} /91-(
by ..8 (XI' {2.d~cJJ~ A.A--<-..J , who is personally known to 11le or
who has produced lj~ p~~-l44 *J.. 435'J. -oto - ;J.Cf;'tJlf _ II /1'1' lr...c,( as identif ication
I ; It c-/( f'/
..., .,
,:.;'.
"'i'
and who did (did not) take an oath.
.,. ",'
_ ----.------- oQtfO 'SNI WM3N39 nMHl 030NO~r:
~ b t66l.6~. AON "dX3 NOlSSI\'MO:)~W:;
r; /C) \<("' /' d // r N t P bI' Coroml' ssJ.' on No. YOIli()l.::l:JO 31'/15 :H19nd ,l.lIVlOl...,.I:...,.~.'.'
~J ~1/<f~-/~C)' \)fJt1.f:U~(~' 0 ary U le, .
(/J~J}P{)I/Jt),p ~ \)eac. h Ip Y (Name of Notary typed, printed or stamped)
..
SHEET 4 OF 4
ENG. DEPT. 3/82
REVISED 10/92
V1\CRF.Q.DDM
ORDINANCE NO. 5472-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
VACATING THE 5.0 FOOT SANITARY SEWER AND UTILITY
EASEMENT LYING ALONG THE WESTERLY SIDE OF LOT 12 AND IN
PART OF LOT 11, BLOCK 266, CARLOUEL SUBDIVISION;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
HHEREAS, it has been requested by William Athanasiou, owner of certain real
property located in the City of Clearwater, that the City vacate the sanitary
sewer and utility easement described herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that said easement is not necessary for
municipal use and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the
general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following:
The 5.0 Foot Sanitary Sewer and Utility Easement lying along the
Westerly side of Lot 12, Block 266, and within that part of Lot 11
lying Northwesterly of a straight line which is Northwesterly of,
parallel to, and 53 Feet distant at right angles from the
SOlltheasterly boundary of Lot 11, Block 266, Carlouel Subdivision,
according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20,
Pages 60 thru 62, of the publ ic records of Pinellas County, Florida,
is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater quitclaims and
releases all of its right, title and interest thereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public
records of Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. fhis ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Approved as to form and
and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
. :., :':.;,J
~ ~
N -Y,.,L 'I
I
Requested Vocation
by Applicant
. .-.
I "-:
CARLO
~
;..0
<~
~
~<'
(<'
P.8
.
SCALf: I N ,T. S.
e,
seylef
I soo, eo\
') E. 0 ')e f(\
u\\\ .
. I-
I~
",,;:;
~ ~t.
.
I
.
NOTE: This is not a SURVEY
"Athanasiou"
Vac. No.: 93-11
Section: 32-28-15
Drown by: D.O. M.
Date: 8/27/93
_ reM ~.
SOO llI[1tL Y RlGlIl OF WI< Y 7, .
OF BRUCE AVENUE' .
, i
"
H JT&.s'3Q-W
I ; , , .
, '.. "
, -
"
" FGM 2,5-
. 0,6 SW U'
'l>
"V d'.
'q) '-b.
~
OElT^ RADIUS Me orollD TANGENT CllcmJ ERG
2."2.8' 17" ' 27Q,2J 12,00 12.06 8,03 S 271i4'38"E(CAL)
12.12 S 271l.('5tWE(F)
!I'MS'1Oo -J.JJ.21 157.41 117.-40 J3.1W S JI.I1"02W~(CAI)
01.10 S ~Wll'.m.E(F)
7'01'09" ~JJ,21 53,07 5J,O~ 26,07 S J9'IO'09"E
. ),
,..
..
, I:
,../ !!',' '.,
.' ,
I, . l.OT n:.
~ <o_..................>_u~.;..~__.,. ......__" --,,,.- ~ '--'--','" .... ~..
,._,~ -~E{;~.L ,1WP--2!L S" J~GE~~
11',,',
r nOJE CT NUMBEH . Op9...:.~'~-OJ5
: ,
,.'
II
. .
. .. '.
'.
...... "
','
SC~: 111-::::~\
"
l.OT
.., ~
I 'to
~ ,
~
(\ ~ ,\f\i0
A~1v 1'~~~
":J . ~~ " '
~tt.J' .~ lf~
~ ~I-'O~
~ '$
~ v'v
'-\\~
. .~'
.tro(P){r)
(5)
~ "1',L
tb~-y~ ~ '.
O''-d ~
. ~ ('
11 '?y ~ ';"~
45-/0 ~ ~ ~O
9~~"Y~~
~ 1"0 ~:.:;' ,
"1' '
.J-
., . I
'I
F~M
~
.
. ,
.... t
, ,
I . "1:' , i
, "
, '
,i'ii t '.1 ..
,~ ~
'j
. '.
" .
.:..: I
, '
"
iJt({;'!'://WI/tJO:" :'
, ,AMY' 24 /993 'l!!;'
, fJu. '.'
,'CIT'r ;;,.,ll,.~IIVb VI"" "
v/"'CLcA ,0"
. R,/fA rEFi
LEGAL ~~If'T1 ot-..J .. "
LOT 12, BLOCK 266 AND THAT PMH OF LOT 11 WI/ICIl LIES ,'Z<:JNltV G' IJ()P;
NORTHWESTERLY OF A STRAIGHT LINE ~NDING IN TItE NCRTHEASTERLY .rt?~~
AND SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 11 AND SO ORA N AS TO BE
Pf\RALLEL TO Ml) 53 FEET DISTANT AT nlotn ANGL S FROM TilE
SOUTtIEASTERL Y BOUNDARY OF LOT 11, BLOCK 26, 'CARLOUEL
SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP on PLAT'THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 60-02, PUDlo Ie RI!COnDS OF PINE LAS.. COUNTY, ,I, '
, FLOltIDA. "
"
,',I
"fi
"
',:,
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
'0 . 10/'7/73
i
SUBJECT:
Alcoholic Beverage Separation Distance Variance Request; Ruth Eckerd Hall; 1111 McMullen Booth
Road; PACT, Inc. (Owner). (AB 93-11)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION:
Approve separation variance of 200 feet to allow an alcoholic beverage use 100 feet from a residential
zone for M&B 24.04, Sec. 9-29-1 6.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
This is a request for an alcoholic beverage separation distance variance to allow expansion of the service
area for an existing 4-COP-X alcoholic beverage sales facility. The proposal is to allow outdoor
consumption of alcoholic beverages at the Ruth Eckerd Hall performing arts center 100 feet from a
residential zone.
The variance worksheet table on page 3 summarizes staff findings concerning the approval standards
for variances. Staff finds that the request meets the standards for approval of Section 45.24 of the City
Code, if conditions established by the Planning and Zoning Board in granting the conditional use permit
associated with the request are followed.
There were no negative comments received from the Police Department or other City departments
concerning this request.
Alcoholic beverage uses within 300 feet: None.
On September 14, 1993, the Planning and Zoning Board unanimously approved a conditional use permit
to allow this use, subject to the conditions listed below.
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A~
pe_
N/
Originating Dept: ~ f"'{\
PLANNING & D~P~N~ \
Costs:
$ NIA
Total
Commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Denied
o Continued to:
I
I
I
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
Advertised:
Date:
Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE
o Not Requi red
Affected Parties
o Noti fied
o Not Requi red
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Attachments:
VARIANCE APPLICATION
CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION
:1\
.'
l
.
o None
Appropriation Code:
o
,:.:;,i ~"..:..:,,~{~
"~J
"
. ,
",,;~i~
AS 93-11
Page 2
Planning & Zoning Board conditions:
(1) The requisite occupational license shall be obtained within six months from the date of this
public hearing;
(2) The applicant shall obtain the requisite alcoholic beverage separation distance variance from
the City Commission; and
(3) Outdoor speakers shall not be used after 11 :00 p.m. on any night.
.~ ('t)
~Q)
'0)
Mea
ma..
aJ
<(
~
~
,
M
0)
CI:l
c::(
0::
UJ
CI:l
~
::>
2
UJ
en
c::(
u
I-
UJ
UJ
J:
en
~
0::
o
5
UJ
U
2
c::(
-
0::
c::(
>
~
I
Q
~
LI.
~
1'0
CIl
.- In
>-CIl
t ::l
CU..c
Q.u
e ::l
Q.CIl
.....c
U U
cu .-
..... ..c
.g ~
CIl ...
cu 0
.c-
1->-
~
c.o
0l1'O
.--
In....
-oC
cu
! E
.- c
CIl.-
"t'l~
c ...
I'O!
cu c
N CIl
.iij .~
,-
cu.c
CIl ::l
::l Q.
C ...
._ 0
CIl .ar
::l E
.9' ctl
c
::l Ol
CIl.5
.- c
>-.-
t~
CIl C
Q. 0 .
OUi6
... >- U
Q. t .0.
.... CIl >-
~ Q.....
..... 0 1'0
.0.......
::lQ.0
CIl CIl C
CIlOlCll
.c ... ...
1-..!2 <<l
c:
Ol
_ 'iij
c:Q)
Q)'C
E~
C:'-
._ en
~Q)C:
t..c: 0
~.....~
C > ~
Q).c~
(.) 'C 0.
:'::Q)Q)
.c_en
:::l~....
o.Q)c
...C3Q)
o :::
..",.. en ...
~.- c:5
E .80 ..c:
~~.<:::
Ol 'C ;:
c'"
.- ~ Q)
c:t: c.J
'as c:
- . ~
c- .-
o~c.
c.J '0. E
>>0
__c.J
~~Ol
0.- c:
00.-
...c:o:.::
0. Q) E~
Q)...
Ol ~ ..
"'en'C
.sgQ)Q)
~ en..c: .
:::l.!a Q)
en --
.- ..c: .c .c
c.J ~.-
>:::l_fI)
t::enenen
Q) Q)O
0. ..c: 0.
oc.J~E
"':E en.-
o.,:::len
- ::0 .S! c:
~o~Q)
:c'-"'E
:::l>0.Q)
(1).<::: Ol.:
Q)=C:::S
..c: c.J .- C'
....~~e
Q)-
..c:c:
....Q)
-E
00.
fl)0
c-
0Q)
.~ ~
:S'C
Cen
0'-
t.)..c: .
....-
__c:
~o~
:Een:'::
o.c:o.
~.S! ~
"'en
0)._ Q)
O>..c:
0.0_
Ec.c
"'Q)O
O..c: 0.
Q)....:::l
0.- 0.
~0:E
..c:c:en
(l)0'C
cn'~ ~
Ol~..c:
c:.:: __
.- 0. --
'Co.~
5a3en
0.... en
"'c.JQ)
....._ CJ
:::S"'Q)
(l)1;;c:
_Q)C:
a3 :::l
.~ oS C
~'C a3
..c:cc:
0. ~.-
"'C~
a31S):::l
'3>:g
c.J '0 ..
'€>'C
~.S '3
0.>0
Q)t~
~8.Q)
-0"8
~ ts. CJ
...
o
o
'0
...
... ::l
g 0
(/) 'C en
.- ... c
... ::l.-
cot:)
1'0 Q) .-
c.J...l<
=coQ)
0.';: 0
0. 0.....
l'OO'C
Q) ... Q)
..c: 0.....
I- fa'.!:a
...
. Q) t:)
c:..c: Q)
en.... ...
'iij - V)
Q) 0 ._
"CQ)CO
Q) (/) Q)
.-= ::l /5
(/) ~ Q)
'CO(/)
c: = :::l
COCOQ)
Q)O..c:
.!:::! .... ....
(/) '0 Q)
.. Q) c.J
Q) '0 c:
(/) Q)'-
:::l Q) V)
c: c: :g
.- Q)-
Q)c.JCO
:::lC:V)
O".~ Q)
.- '- en
c: co co
::l > '-
V) - Q)
.- co >
>EQ)
....._ .0
~.5 c.J
o.E:g .
eQ)..c:en
o...c: 0 5
.... .... c.J._
c.J CO'-
Q)en >
.~ c: '- co
.c'- 0 0.
:::It:)--
V)Q)V)~
Q) :::l CO._
..c: 0" Q) -
I-Q)'-co
...coo.
Q)
o...c:
.- ....
..c:_
~o
... Q)
CO I/)
..c::::l
~Q)
co-
I/).c
V) co
Q) c:
c.J0
Q)I/)
c: co
c: ~
:::l0l
Q)C:
'5:;:
co
Q)E
E_
80
"'Q)
Q)en
>0
00.
B:i
~~
CO..c:
en_
en,-
Q) 0
c.J_
Q)
c: t
Ef'J
:::l-
E.~
'S c.J
.- Q)
E'-
Q)~
..c: .-
....i
.!a c.J
/U~
c.Jo.
ac:
'f6 .;
>....
~i
I-~-o
M''S16
-'--
is
>
o
...
0.
Q.
to
Q)
c.J
C
to
't:
to
>
...
o
..-
'0
...
to
'0
C
to
...
V)
V)
:E
...
..c:
...
.~
>-
Q.
E
o
t.:l
o
...
V)
...
to
Q)
Q.
Q.
to
...
V)
Q)
::l
0"
Q)
...
Q)
t.:l
C
to
't:
to
>
V)
:E
I-
...
c
co
.!:a
Q.
0.
co
Q)
..c:
...
..-
o
Q)
.:
V)
Q)
'0
Q)
..c:
....
I:
o
Q.
::l
~>-
...t::
COQ)
Eo.
't: e
Q.o.
'OQ)
Q)..c:
~....
.05
.... ....
01:
I: ...
.!!! a
Q)~
c.J_
I: to
CO.-
._ c.J
... I:
COco
> I:
co!;:
... ...
OQ)
-....
....co
V)Q)
Q) ...
:::len
glO
... ~
~g
V)
~o
..'"" ....
CIl
CIl
::l
i6
c
o
.+:;
:s
c
o
u
CIl
.c
...
)0.'
.0 In
"O'f
CIl CIl
.: 0.
::l 0
go.
...
CIl ~
g:s
.+:; g
~ 0
.- ...
.s ~
- CIl
... C
] 0
<<l CIl
CIl....
o.u
CIl <<l
... 0.
g .s
'E CIl
::l .::
010
"O0l
c CIl
<<l C
C CIl
.~ 10
gj .~
"O.~
CIl E
.~ ....
CIl .-
CIl E
.c ~
1-0.
-d
CIl
...
<<l
o u
....E
~ .!!!
.~ >-
~t
..... CIl
.5 0.
.. e
o 0.
- CIl
~.c
c ....
CIl.c
E u
.t: :c
~ ~
"0 c
)0..-
~"O
.t: g
~.c
<<l ...
E.8
CIl.c
.o.~
... CIl
o c
c CIl
-.c
:: ....,
~ .5
CIl CIl
u ....
c C
<<l CIl
't: E
<<l CIl
> >
CIl 0
:co.
: E
0.-
...
0)0
c
.+:; ~
c CIl
l'!! 0.
0)0
Q) ...
.co.
... ~
@~
cu
CIl
::l
(6
I:
o
.+:;
:s
c
o
U
cu
..c
....
)0.'
.c~
"'C..o::
.~ ~
::l 0
g'cs.
..
CIlg'
g:s
.+:; g
~o
-e ::
._ ::l
-CIl
~ I:
,.:.::0
to CIl
cu....
0.c.J
CIl l'O
.. C.
g.s
"'Ccu
:i.~
o~
"'C0l
C cu
1'0 I:
C cu
.~ ~
~.~
"'C.~
cu E
.~ ...
CIl.-
cu E
..c~
1-0.
...cu
>.0';;
....1: d3.!::
OI:Oll'O
....e::ll:c.
..c l'Oe
.~ e "'C .-
-ocu"
...u..co
o ......c
)0. ~ cu.!!l
-....CIlC
0. 1'0'-
c.'" cu e
::l 0 ..._
CIlcug"'C
cu (J._ >-
.... c: ...-
l'Ol'O(/)(6
::l ... .....-
C'l'Ocu....
cu cu cu C
"'Cc.,:=:~
l'oC.CIlCll
cl'O(J.Q
... cu.- ::l
''''..c - CIl
.: .....g ...
<<lec.o
Q. ,
E 0 cu >-
__ .::..c <<l
t)....~~
C ~-- >-
_':=:I:C
==cuo<<l
~ "'C..o:: c
cu ,~.-
U >-Ol~.
ct:l:cu>-
I'OCUO......
.t: C. (J <<l ~
l'o e cu CIl 0.
> Q...c (J 0
CD "":':'"
..c 1: cu.Q Q.
"'CUCll::lOl
"'U<<lQ,C
o <<l cu cu.-
.,.... ... _ "'C
Cl "'C (J -= C
C co I: ::l
.- .-... 0
co>-cu...
... _ Ol ..
l'!! c (6 C ::l
Ol 0.- <<l CIl
.- 1: "'C ...
cu1ii<<lao
......c :;:;... cu
- CIl .::l
_C.Qcu_
,,, cu ::l .. 1'0
:::::. > CIl; >
ro
>
o
...
0.
0.
~
Q)
(,.)
c
~
.;::
~
>
...
o
-
'C
...
~
"C
C
~
.....
fI)
fI)
:E
-
..c:
.....
.~
>-
C.
E
o
(,.)
o
....
fI)
...
~
Q)
0.
0.
~
....
(I)
Q)
:::s
0'
Q)
...
Q)
(,.)
C
a3
.;::
ro
>
fI)
:E
....
,
....
Q)
"C
....
o
..
>
.....
Q)
-
ro
(I)
.c
-
ft5
Q)
.c
.~
::c
:::s
0.
Q)
.c .
->
.....'!::
(,.)c:
Q):::s
:t:E
~E
~o
Q)(,.)
~Q)
Q).c
>-
"C_
roo
Q~
Cro
--
=Cii
;: ;:
~ft5
.!:: CD
~c
"C~
Q)....
CJO
f6 '
'a: B
a3c
>Q)
Q)'-
.cC
....~
_c
~8
'C
C
~
cOl
Ol.S
.- 'C
:gc
'C:::S
Q)e
- ...
.- :::l
(1)1/)
.~ c
..c:o
-
... I/)
c-
0)c.J
.- ~
(1)0.
Q)E
'C ._
Q)Q)
.<::: >
(I)'~
'C~
cOl
~Q)
C
~Q)
'iij 16
0)
ai":e
~E
C(l)
.- c
Q).S!
:::s-
C'~
.--
C'-
:::lE
(1)=
.--
>'E
t::~
:g,o.
OQ)
"'(1)
o.:::l
-
~rocn
'"",, c Q)
.c 0'-
:::l '.;:: t::
fI).- Q)
Q) '0 0.
.cco
....8ts.
.....
c
Q)
.....
.5
"C
c
~
.....
.;:
'0.
(I)
ro
....
Q)
c
Q)
Ol
Q)
.c
-
IS)
....
~
'0
'S;
....
o
c
.~
"C
Q)
...
'r;;
Q)
"C
Q)
(,.)
c
~
.;::
ro .
>~
(1)0
.c(,.)
..........
'eai
OlE
co.
.~ c
c-
~Q)
..>
Ola)
Q)"C
~~
.....
60-
_0
~
c
I
<
~
I
!
LI.
en
;
Iii
.5
>-
t ... CIl CIl
CIl g -E g
Q, -+:;
e '0 C3 l'o
Q. .t: ,,.:.::.a
.... CIl ...-
cu CIl ';:l 0 CIl
-E =t;.+:; ~ cu
OClC....c
.... C.- 0 0
CIl.C ...~ ....
::lO~E-o
O'NCIl...CU
.- (1) ..
c CIl u ~ cu
::l-ECIl :2
CIl -0 Cl CIl
.- 0 CIl C c
.c .... ....- 0
(J CIl 0.:2 U
:C:C .:.~ cu
~I'OCIl-.Q
(J C 1'0 ...
c:':: ~ 0
.~ ~ 0 '0 c
.t:: to )0. c =
1:1>-....01'0
c _ ~._..c
OEo.'5C1l
(J"0(J'"
o .- ai
1'0.... 0. CIl E (J
E.c CIl ~ ~ c
o ::l.c cu Q..!2
.::.........cI'O~
0_... >
In >- 0 c.....
!a:: CIl.- 0 1'0
.... ~ c cu.t::...o
I'OCO-o-
1:1 =t; ..j;l co ~ Cl
ell ... u E CIl C
tjo<<lcu.c.,;:l
cu~C3~cuf6
::l.ccl'O..c...
0' .... ...... Cl
~ .a; .~ .!a :i cu
cucuEo..c
(J III III >-..c ....
c.al C c.'t: t
.~] 1'0 <t: ~ 8-
101'O>-.-oQ.
>c.o""Cll::l
~ .~"i ~ E ~
~ KJ 10 =a ~ .~
-::l~o.cu-;
~C'YI'OQ.;lO
~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ALCOHOUC BI!VERAGE SALES - MINIMUM DISTANCE VARIANCE APPUCATION
(Please Prinl or Type, Black Ink Only)
.PROPERTY OWNERS NAME &:. ADDRESS:
(Attach Proof Per instructions)
PACf , Inc.
1111 McMullen Booth Rd.
-REPRESENTATIVES (If any) NAME AND ADDRESS:
Susan W. Carlson. RC:;()lIirr>
Clearwater, FL 34619
150 2nd Ave.. N.. 17t"h Floor. P.O. 1/J034
St. Petersburg, FL 33733
TELEPHONE #: (813) 791-7060
(813)895-1971
TEI..J!PHONE #:
NAME OP BUSINESS:
PACT. rnc ./Ruth Eckerd lIall
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY (Subject of Request):
1111 Ndlllll I'n Boo th Rrl
Clearwater, FL 34619
I-EGALDESCJtn>TlONOP I'ROPERTY (SubjeaoCRcqucst): M & B 24.03 and 24.04 9-29-16'
Section 9, Township 29 South. Range 16 East Pinellas County, Florida
ZONING DISTRICT: plsp
V A.IUANCE REQUES1' (DescribelBe Specific/Attach Additionn18 ]fl X 11 inch sheet if ncedcc.l):
Variance of 200 fect CrOln rninimtun distance requirement to allow alcoholic beverage soles within..l..Q2. Ccet." from
(check one ormc;rc): _ Church, _ School, _ Hospital. -L Residential Zone, _ Simllarly Licenced
Alcobolic Beverage ESlablishmcnt (COP License). .
State Be~erage Uceosc Designation:
4-COP-X
Holder of Slate License::
PACT. Jne.
A CONDmONAL USE APPUCATION FOR ALCOHOLIC DEVE.RAGB SALES FOR TillS PROPERTY WAS
APPROVED DY TfIE 1'L-ANNlNG & ZONING DOARD ON (DATE).
OTHER. VARIANCES (CHECK. ONE): --L ARE NOT NECBSSARY, OR _ WERE APPROVED DY TIm
DEVELOPMENT COOl! ADJUSTMENT BOARD ON (DATE). .'1
I liAVE READ ORDINANCE 4420-87 AND SECI10N 137.012, CODE OF ORDINANCES OF TIm CITY OP
CI.EARW ATER.
REASON FOR VAlUANCE REQUEST. In order for the City Commission to mnke the determination prescribed by
Ordinnncc 4420-87, tbe foUowing slatements MUST be compleled:
1. There are special conwlioC5 or circumstances applicable to the property involved because: Ru th Eckerd Ha 11
is a regional Performing Arts Center attracting patrons from a large geographic area.
2. Sucb variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of n subslantial property right possessed \>y other property
in tbe snmc dislriCl under the tcnns oC this ordinance IUId denied to the property in question because: The expanded
areas will be an additional amenity providing greater patron experience.
3. The granting of this varionce will not conCer any special privilege denied 10 otber IllDds, structures, or dwelliogs in tbe
same dislricllUld will not be injurious to tbe neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental 10 the public weUare because:
The outdoor areas will be utilized during our normal operating hours and our
patrons would not be perceived as a nuisance to our residential neighbors.
SIGNATURE OF PROPE.ltTY OWNER ("OR REPRESENTATIVE
Before me, tbe undersigned aUlbority. personnlly appeared L \:.0 N A LO'vE who belDg duly sworn,
says under oath thc mlltten IlIld facts set out above are true and correct to the best of~er knowledge Il.Dd beUef. .
Sworn to Bnd subscribed beforc lIle this 572:> dny of A ~ c~ L.>.6 -r A.D.t 19 Cj .?:> . . . ,,'
(!J~uz-(),. C-u<!..--~
Notary PubUc-',;,'Y I u_.::, ~ ,..I. c,. I.w, .-.
-PROPERTY OWNER OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST ATrEND HE.'\JUNG. II~J CC:!lm!::lor. Etrl::~ AUa. :1/:, l'i9S
- J"ndlld'hr"lIGtroi,..'"tl."cnuln~.
it
.. Attach Powcr of Attorney or notarized statement from owner Duthorizing representative - not npplicable if reprc:ientntive
is a practicing attorney acting on bebalf of the property owner(s).
... Allnch proof or nclulII distuncc (See Lund Developmenl Coue Sec. 136.024(cJ)(3) for mctho<.l of mcaswcmcnt).
S/89
. .
. oJ
I
, .: 1< ,~;~.'.<.;
, I A.B,# tf371Tl
ALCOHOUC BEVERAGE SALES
MINIMUM DlS1' ANCR V AlUANCE Al'PUCA'I10N
Page 2
I hereby affirm that I am applying for Ii variancc ror property addressed as roUowa:
, 1111 McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 34619
PAC!', Inc.
rrom tbe distancc requirement to be beard by the Ciry Commission, and have puid the application fee according to the
current schedule of fees, which will be used to offset the costs' to the City of Clearwater for advertizing pubUc bearing notices
and other expenses. This application Is being filed prior to 11 decision being rendered by the Planning and Zoning Boord
on a Conditional Use request for the salDe property. By signing this rorm I aUl acknowledging thaI. shonld the Planning and
ZonIng Board deny the request for Conditional Use, or should the Planning and Zoning Board grant the request and the
decision be appealed to the State Heuring Officer the vurinnce application will be removed from the City Commission
Agenda and the application fee will!!Q!. be refunded. Also, should the Planning and Zoning Board continue Ii decision on
the Conditional Use request necessitating additional advertising. I will bear the additional advertising costs.
Furthermore, should tbe decision or the Planning and Zoning Board be appealed to the State Hearing Officer, I
understand the varinnce Dpplicatioo will be on bold pending tbe Hearing Qrficds decision and, depeoding 00' that decision,
I will either be liable for addirjonnl advertising COSlS or will forfeit my application fee.
~~f/~
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 5""0 day ofGu. jus-t A.D., 19C\~.
~C.~n~~
Notary Public
~u:aj " ~&.:.:iic.. S:Clt d h_.._..1
I.iy Com::l!:::on E::j,ircs f,l:S. 2". 19~5
I... Ilood,d 1il,. 1'"1 r.1n .J...,o"".I...
. '.
.. .
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
. .
.
VARIANCE INSTRUCl10NS
AJmlication and Submission Requirements:
1. The application must be fully completed, signed by the property owner (or a representative of the owner),
and notarized. Ally application signed by II representative oC the owner must be supplemented by a power
of attorney or notarized statement from the owner authorizing representative. Proof oC property ownership
must be attached for an application to be considered complete. Adequllte proof sball consist of one of the
rollowing:
II. A copy or the deed.
b. A copy of title insurance.
c. A letter from II practicing attorney confirming property ownership.
2. The application sball be filed at the office of the Development Code Administrator. At the time of filing,
a fee shall be paid according to the current schedule of rees. '
3. Ally supplementary information, exhibits, plans or maps which are to accompany and constitute part of the
application must be submitted at the time of lilinB of the application. Twelve (12) copies of all such
doeument5 llluger than 8 112 x 14 lnebc5, shall be furnisbed by the applicant for di5tributiODaI purposes.
. .
"
".
:111
l"4; 'j"..
~~ ~r\,..'..';. : i ".
I,. "I"l'II'~" '. .
'.'.,,1'"'..1.., '...;':.....'.
. '.. ,~~ t _., ,. ~
">:' i.. :1...
:,.,
, r ~, ;...-:
"'". .p' ,.... t ..
" '. '-'j -'";'
.'
"': I ~' .'"
: t ~. ;
'.~i.~.':~
,
:1
'..,t', ....;.11. ' .
'.,It:'~l'-" ,';,Io;.r,' ..
. ':.,. ..""
...'
,~r
1~'
';,/
.1'
n,
"
,.
:!l.'" .
, .' <. ,~,...
.
...
..'
~ "
~. \I,.t
''\
l
,
!.
.
t
\.
......r
;1
., i~:' .f.'....;, '. "~~,~, ...." ~ "j;'
. .... . . , , , . , . '. ,. . . . . . j', I . . :~, .
, . ~lsS
11(,0--
.
CITY OF ClEARWAlER q 3 5 +
Conditional Use Application - Alcoholic Beverage Sales ( U I -
(Please Print or Type, Black Ink Only)
.PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME & ADDRESS:
(Attach Proof Per Instructions)
BUSINESS OWNER:
(Holder of State License)
, .t ,', , I
PAcr , Inc.
1111 McMullen Booth Road
Clearwater, Florida 34619
PACT, Inc.
1111 McMullen Booth Road
Clearwater, Florida 34619
TELEPHONE: ( 813 )
791-7060
TELEPHONE:
813
791-7060
REPRESENTATIVE NAME & ADDRESS: Susan VI. Carlson, Esquire
150 2nd Ave. , N., 17th Floor, P. o. Box 14034 Telephone: ( 813
St. Petersburg, FL 33733
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY (Subjoct of Request): 1111 McMullen Booth Road
895-1971
NAME OF ESTABLISHMENT TO BE LICENSED:
PACf, Inc. /Ruth Eckerd Hall.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Subject of Request):. M & B 24.03 and 24.04 9-29-16
Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 16 East Pinellas County, Florida
......
ZONING DISTRICT:
P/SP
LAND USE PLAN CLASSIFICATION: P/SP
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Performing Arts Center
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Performing Arts Center
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North
East
Condominiums and Park
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE DESIGNATION:
4-COP-X
South Single Family Residential
West Hampton Gardens-Multi-
Family Condominiums
~ On Premise Consumption 0 Package Sales
Single Familv Residential
DO YOU PROPOSE TO PROVIDE ENTERTAINMENT ON LICENSED PREMISES? It yes, describe Yes
T~PE OF REQUEST (Check APPlicabl~1f~ or Boxes):
ONew License OAddress Change OBusiness Ownership Change OUcense Designation Change
.'1
~Expansion
SEATS
Exiting: 2523
INDOOR
FLOOR AREA(sq.ft.)
Existing: 128,000
PARKING
OUTDOOR
LAt\lD AREA(sq.ft.) SEATING AREA(sq.ft.)
Existing: 4.24 acre ~ Existing: 16,000
Existing: 935
Proposed: N / A Proposed: N/ A Proposed: N/ A Proposed: N/ A Proposed: N/ A
HOURS OF OPERATION: Weekdays' 8:00'.-a.m.-l:30 a.m. Weekends Saturday: 8:00 a.m.-l:30
Sunday: 1:00 p.m.-12:00 MN
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY (Determined by Fire Marshal): ~ '
. Indoor Outdoor 500 SIGNATURE OF FIRE MARSHA~"""-~ ~. ~
(CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
1NF9RMATIONINSUPPORTOFREOUEST: Thp- purpose of the reQuest is to expand the ah11ity of
the "'applicant, Ruth Eckerd Hall, to better serve patrons by adding pavilions which will
serve refreshments including alcoholic beverages before and during performances and other
PACT, Inc. functions. Ruth Eckerd Hall presently offers refreshments including alcoholic
beverages at various locations within the premises. The expansion would include the
pavilions as shown on the enclosed survey plan.
OR BUSINESS OWNER)
'7 /!J 0
I
day of
A.D., 19 9l..3
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
by _ J-c:io...J A kD Lou E:
_ ' who is personally known to me andlor has produced
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF Pit"..! ~ L.L..A S
as identification.
/1 LA. ~ . ,,.. . - I C Notary Public, Commission No.
~Y~lt.;".SI'"n''''''..I''' ' "'1 .
,..,..,_. .\,:\..: ",.............
My Co:n:-:issiott E~i'irC!; Aug. 26, 191/5 C H ~ 1 Sr-l N'E.. C. . (Name of'Notary typod, printed or stamped)
I-- '...b.d 1,,,,, 1''''1 ,..I:l'JlIOUrclOCC: 11l.C. _ _ CO k.E.-\J\A t-J
.PROPERTY OWNER, BUSINESS OWNER, AND/OR REPRESENTATIV~ MUST ATTEND HEARING. FOR A REQUEST
INVOLVING A TRANSFER OF BUSINESS OWNERSHIP, THE BUSINESS OWNER OR THAT OWNER'S DULY
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL ATTEND THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RECEIVED
VARIANCES REQUIRED
CITY COMMISSION A VClrIQ~Ce r-o 1'Y;;niY1Uh disTtrr.cc Sf!. C{f1T,'UYI (Jf
l.ou tee+- to 1 liD IJ q c.C)~ Q i ((, j. <,_~r'J~' S '1 ~s \IV t+h i V'\ (GO "Go-.
D.C.A.B NO N E.
THIS IS INTENDED TO BE A 2-SIDED LEGAL DOCUMENT. NOTARY INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS PAGE
MUST BE ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF A COMPLETED APPLICATION FOR APPLICATION 'TO BE ACCEPTABLE.
I,
\
. . '. ~.. .' . " .... .
, .
"
"
,t I
"~I:
.. I.
..' . ' ~ .)
~ 1"'''''-- ---...,....... I
,
'__H] N
"-I
Co
.....w
- ~
1
~
~
~~
;1
Ii
:J i /ll.\
I
'(
I,
2 G !~)^
- ....-- 'r..... .----.., - .. ..-. - ..- .-.
7.74 ^ r~!4'~~) 27 ~)^
.-.......- -, ...' ... .' ,....-....... .... ....-- .-.
2F.\JA 283n ?O'1^
,!.. ..
I
.J
)
- ......--..... ....--..-, ...-........,
n....t(n
,...-""-"'.
,.
M,^,TCH SIIEET
~~ m!~~~~~~~~.~~__,_.?jl
1" - 200'
~
~l
'~
-1
6
:J
s:;
...
'} ....
HI
1
\
, ,.; \..,w ('
_'.._ . k-l' ....
,L ' "roo
. 0 flY p.-oCI.
t~"'( 4,...,,4~
, "'1\
, . \ I"'\'
'\ ') ~
. .:.~:'"
. t r"" a..
,I,. '" ~.- "j' , \
... . I .\, \ I
" .,... ~
....... I
~
" .
~
.~. -rrn' , ~.,' . ,.
I,
1..: .", of 14" " I'," I -
..... ,1'.1. t I," I 'f ~.'I ..\ '1 00, ..SCALE
~ I 'I I .1 I' . I' " '
.) ) ,
. ~ . ... .' .....
1 '
/\40.,' III
Nt: 1/'1 OF SECllON
. 9 - 29 S 16 E
'J
t.
'.
11
~
I;
w
;; !~
~ 'r.
~. ~
I
f
Q4/25/89, i
, . , .~I
\)A,Q" , ). '- {1
HOU SE 'l-' ~~!) ,)~AJ~
1 1J!l.h. ,~,tjo. t,.':
. "---' f
- .
OATE
J~ 3
6
~ ~
RS4
~ k
:g
~
ST.
~
~,^,l
!~ ",0-
.l.
~I
..,
'"
! .
I
'.
'~\ ".t:.^-/-:,\
/.jA UJ: ~
n 0 \J Nt', """t 0:.
I
.1
0.,
...
I;
~
l:;
U
.. "
11\ 17
IX '"
l; ~
.". . 1?~t7
..
\1l II)..... 10
~ 'f.4? ~
. .... .-- .......... .-..
Ii
0411 1/11.,1111" 'I., "1"\'
. . . .... . t' I 'r c .
.. . . . . . . . . ,
'. III
r. ru '1'<'.1,. ,. I' .. 111111'
l II t, I 1. ,. .' , . ~. ,. ..,
r "1 C'.I 'I ,., II .,' . I I I I., (
I
I
,
II
.,
'i
Nt)(10 $1. ~
~~-~~J'L-=11.~L
1.\ -;~;;-- ;;1 'J1
.~i."!:,:",,,
. . ~~. . . ., '1.~~1 ;.; ,.
~.S. ,
I .i~~ . . . , . . '..i
.~j "',. - .
.;J}' ,
. ,,)!
(t:~.
"I, 1
/1 } }it
l'i l}i
.; .
/1"/ '.'
II~! f
/1.';~ H'~:
~
r
Jtl
11
I ~
,\
'.'
I, ".
f''l/M;
i..., ",
. '/: \
t. .';;h.~ :' \ ;
'-d. ~\ .
'''''1' \ ,I
11'. ~1; ,
. II!' ;.' I
I r ~. ~ . .
~
Cl..
\Q
~
~
~
~
'l
'.
~
tI.l
~
CIl
~
~
Cl..
~
>
-<
!ii
\
J
.j
t
'l
t
24/03
24/03
PIS PI
t.rP
.~ '\)
. .. . . ~
:w..~. .'
~:~' ," '. ,;./;
01"1
. .",":t.
iJr>'b,...~
~~:~.....
.:..~,~~:..
'=r: ,?I"I:- -.1'. ."
..~t~'4~..i.
._'~'~~~~. ~/:::..:;.....'.....,...
O.R. -4C).4~g81
~40-"7~
6& O.R
4640-" \I.
0$
W
::l
~
1<
I
I
I
!
l(j ~ ~ ~ 0> Qi I l~ !l
Oi ~ 0; 0) . ;; 0; I' ~ I . I ~ I I i~: : g:. II I ~ i II' i""! I l i ~ .
~ 22 2"'( I 1,0) I ! :~: I 10): i :~! I' l~ I .1 ;~ i ,'; I:~
:.............,. . ....., oJ ... 24 2.~. ~.~..... . 27 .....,. ..1 .~:~.~~9 :~.~~~ :bl~:Q;~!;::~ ::2l:!:~ ;~ 1~:~L._.. '. J~l~jEl~
NAME:: rAc.Tllt4t./~lITH EC.KERI) J.I~l~/C~~l_~ON _
C~ U1 ~#< Q3-S4. I I I P&Z SEPl 14 1"3
A Ei #'53...:.lL PUBLIC HEARING DATES: CC Ol.-T. 7.' 1''3
.......ATL~~:..P.AGE.....?74 ~..... SEC' q ..... TWP: 2 9 S' RGE fto E
j:ltlllll\lt"IIII~~):~III:tll.l~1111:111!11!lil"III~\~;Wl'$~~t6!~i;~1~lj;':!'1!i!;;i;i;:~;'
OS/R
~
~
~
~
~
~~
7-
....nnl
.
.~
PACT
c: 25
.. 1106
24
1104
23 1102
22
. 10to
1008
21
60
II' ! III ! ! I 80
...- IN' n v to 'I'-- I to .
l'" I 'P' ~ ",111")'I')!f"1 I
tilJJJillill
.~ ~ 0)
'~ ~
I'" ..,
SAN
CITY
'l'INED
.,
O.R. 4640 1173
24/04
p
O.R. 5J50-1376
Q:l
Q:l
1
2
5
6
7
Q:l
..,
~
.,
l\l
co
Q:l
r..
tOOt
RS4
. Ii5 JOSE
ST.
o
OX)
- Ql
I() lQ
- ~
., 0)
01
Q:l
~
13 0)
PJ
14
..
""
..
0)
Ia
CD
-
.,
t-.
t-.
~
eo,
8,
9
10
11
12
15
18
19 j:J 20 I 21
~ ~ ~ I~
16
17
Q:l ...
lQ CD
.. -
., .,
Q
""
..
..,
90t
. '0
OX)
o
OX)
SAN R S 4
ST.
PEDRO
..
9t;1
I")lv~ U)
w I") I I') I') I'l
:::> -! .... .- .-
~ l~ j" lco Q)
~ F~ I~ ~
.
Wi
I
I=. I
I
8]~
~p
~
I
/
I
.'
I
a I
,
v'
#
i..
~
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
II. /0/7/93
SUBJECT:
Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment, and Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2178
Burnice Drive; Owner: Alice Warner Brown Trust; Representative: Gary Warner, Trustee; 0.24 acres
m.o.1. (A 93-19 & LUP 93-25)
RECOMM ENDA TION/MOTION:
Approve Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendmentto Residential Low, and Zoning Atlas
Amendment to Single Family Residential "Six", for Lot 4, Glen Ellyn Estates and pass Ordinances No.
5448-93, 5449-93 and 5450-93 on first reading.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located on the north side of Burnice Drive, approximately 310 feet west of
Belcher Road and 1,400 feet south of Druid Road. The applicant wishes to annex to obtain City sewer
service. The lots in Glen Ellyn Estates that are in the City have a zoning of Single Family Residential
"Six" (RS-6). The Countywide Future Land Use Category for this subdivision is Residential Low, 5.0
units per acre maximum. It is proposed to assign a Future Land Use Category of Residential Low and
zoning of RS-6 to the applicant's property. Ultimately, however, this property will be placed in one of
the proposed Residential Planned Development zoning districts to be developed as the Pine lias Planning
Council Consistency Program is completed.
Public Works has requested that the right-of-way of Burnice Drive in front of both the applicant's
property and the adjacent lot to the east (Lot 3) also be annexed at this time. This will place the right-
of-way under the City's jurisdiction and enable the City to install a street light in this area.
The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this application on September 14, 1993, after
which they unanimously endorsed the proposed Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment to
Residential Low, and Zoning Atlas Amendment to RS-6 to the City Commission.
Pertinent information concerning the request is summarized in the tables on page 2.
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/^
N/A
N/A
COltl:
$ N/A
Total
Commilsion Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Denied
o Continued to:
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
Advertised:
Date: 8/31/93 & 9/9/93
Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE
o Not Required
Affected Partio.
Il5I Notified
o Not Required
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Attachment.:
ORDINANCES NO. 5448-93, 5449-
93, & 5450-93
LOCA T ION MAP
Appropriation Code:
o None
."fa
~~ Printed on recycled paper
A 93-19 & LUP 93-25
Page 2
EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE OF
APPLICANT'S AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
LOCATION IN CITY FUTURE LAND USE
OR PLAN CATEGORY ZONING ACTUAL USE
COUNTY
Subject County Residential Low R-3 Single family residential
Property (5.0 u .p.a. max.)
North City Low Density RS-8 Single family residential
Residential
South Co unty Residential Low R-3 Single family residential
East Co unty Residential Low R-3 Single family residential
West Co unty Residential Low R-3 Single family residential
ZONING RESTRICTIONS
DESCRIPTION
RS-4
REQUIREMENTS
1l111!lrflll'..11
':i:.:~~.iil;'::j!ij:iil!;':i':!.:!~::~:'~'j;':~.~I!!~.~i~:!:ll~'~:~j:!'j.i!:,::!~!'!ji::'i:!'::ij:i'..l
:;!t:ij::j:ii::l:,i!.;!i"j:jz:~i~~I!j:;I:~:~'!I:!I!~:,!I!iIJ!~.~:j.'!:lji:::~i~!::::::::::.;!
Illit:lilflll'l~iillllillll'l
:j:;':."li!!i:i.;i:::i:"';;!:::.':.i::i!::::'..g:~!.l;;ft~i.:::I:~!fu:jij!li!j:;,i!:i!ji.,!.,:,.ii'::.!.i.l.:~!:'::!:'j!l,
137 ft.
EXISTING
Density
Lot Area
Lot Width at
setback line
3.75 u.p.a. max.
10,000 sq. 11. min.
80 ft. min.
4.24 u.p.a.
10,275 sq. ft.
75 ft.
Depth
90 ft. min.
OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS
AGENCY
YES
NO
X
X
Pinellas Planning Council/Countywide Planning Authority
Florida Department of Community Affairs
ABBREVIATIONS:
R-3
RS-4-
RS-6
RS-8
u.p.a.
Single Family Residential (County)
Single-Family Residential "Four" (City)
Single-Family Residential "Six" (City)
Single-Family residential "Eight" (City)
Residential units per acre
" ,,",. _...n....:..
.
I
t
~
ORDINANCE NO. 5448-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF BURNICE DRIVE, WEST OF BELCHER ROAD, CONSISTING OF
LOT 4, GLEN ELLYN ESTATES, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
2178 BURNICE DRIVE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
BURNICE DRIVE ABUTTING BOTH LOTS 3 AND 4, INTO THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE
BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on
the map attaclled hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to
annex the proper'ty into the City pursuant to Sect ion 171. 044, F 1 or i da Statutes,
and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in
connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the
City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
Lot 4, Glen Ellyn Estates, according to the plat thereof as recorded
in Plat Book 34, Page 32, of the public records of Pine11as County,
Florida, together with the right-of-way of Burnice Drive abutting
both Lots 3 and 4.
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby
accep t 5 the ded i ca t i on of a 11 easements, parks, rights-of-way and other
dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user
within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning
and Development Director are directed to include and show the property described
herein upon the official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map
at tached hereto, with the Clerk of the C i rcu i t Court and wi th the County
Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and
shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days
after adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita G~rvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cl~
.-;1
ORDINANCE NO. 5449-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF BURNICE DRIVE, WEST OF BELCHER ROAD,
CONS ISTING OF LOT 4, GLEN ELLYN ESTATES, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2178 BURNICE DRIVE, TOGETHER WITH THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BURNICE DRIVE ABUTTING BOTH LOTS 3 AND
4, FROM UNCLASSIFIED TO RESIDENTIAL LOW; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future 1 and use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be
reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
Property
Lot 4, Glen Ellyn Estates, according to
the plat thereof as recorded in Plat
Book 34, Page 32 of the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, together with the
right-of-way of Burnice Drive abutting
Lots 3 and 4. (LUP93-25)
Land Use Cateqorv
From: Unclassified
To: Residential Low
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5448-93.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
.". '-:-i
.:j)
.":l:""
ORDINANCE NO. 5450-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SI DE OF BURN ICE
DRIVE, WEST OF BELCHER ROAD, CONSISTING OF LOT 4, GLEN
ELLYN ESTATES, WHOSE POST OFF ICE ADDRESS IS 2178 BURN ICE
DRIVE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BURNICE DRIVE
ABUTTING BOTH LOTS 3 AND 4, AS DESCRIBED MORE
PARTICULARLY HEREIN, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, AS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-6);
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth
in th is ord i nance is found to be reasonab 1 e, proper and appropr i ate, and in
compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County,
Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of
Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
Lot 4, Glen Ellyn Estates, according to
the plat thereof as recorded in Plat
Book 34, Page 32 of the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, together with the
right-of-way of Burnice Drive abutting
Lots 3 and 4. (A93-19)
Zoninq District
RS-6 - Single Family
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5448-93.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City cfterk
J ., City Attorney
'.
,i.
, '.J:}
\. .". ,":',:1.~ ,\,' ,I ,:. ",'
~ I
9 !ltlJ :
. , . . .... J
!/IB
;
1(J 3.:,
:: I .., ,., UI
.. . q, I
oj I oj j Ii r ;j J
.' I .~ I
I ...,,'
COl.LEGE I
. ,.
I .)
{..l 'I'!> ~
l'
oj i .
,~I
rt
1 ~ _
9(10
121
/010
.-,1.
" 1." I ()'1
,
"I .
~I
~.
I 'j J
I r
/9 ~ IliC)
. ~~ I
DHIVE
.,'
;.~.' ~j ! 'l,; \ ~11 ~
/ N IN;; ;j
.. I "", Ii HI I' ;;+ ;~]tl . n(:~. . -;.;~-
" : 1 OJ~: 11 (J6 .~!-f(jT/ ~ll UB :'.l l', ~
I .. ~~ ~!I ___.~ __....!2 __ _i. r.
C5 DHlVE
')
~J I'
DRIVE ~: C>
~;II . ,.. ~l-'-' .~ ~
1.j 5 6 tj ~) 5 ~; oc
. -.\ .... ..-- 5
:g tjl ~'I 82 .. g
r, ;j 'f.
g 124
''4
r.
(
II
r"
~...'.,I ~: ~il ~;I~
Ii ;4 . ~; ;:;
~IJ rl.!)~ ~J.I I ~.U 9..: .
I U tJ :\ ,J C:j ~ ~l ,\. ,T;'191 ,~,~~I'
~f~ : 99 10 ! ,,1 UO I P A (l, ~_ "
<, u, : r, I ., ,101 '"!JO ,IJ. , '
,.. ," I n I oj /' ;' 1-
. , . . '_ ~f;J ,
1> ~~ \) I
'1' 1() 2 ': I! <J -\.~'
I L
1-')
".
If>
II'}.
'I'
...
"9 'II
- ~
./,
{ I
I ",
) c.
j II
,) 1
,
'}
i 2
I '15
~
.~
-i. J
~~ 1/7
01
" 0\
.
I~' /3).
.l.
"
f.
~~~ :)
:;,
':,; ',)j
i\
.1: G
!,~
.~':;; ,07
91
;"'
'10
'}.,
....
" l'
7.'\:
~I
,; !
r L
.. ..
\.
...
100U
~I
V)
n'
\1)
.>
,',
.,
LJlllvU~~" y
l. V1
..,
."
01
;~
OJ
1000
129
12U
/006
...
....
:J
It I v, U) .. - -.
~'~ t: . ~! Pl '\ (~ I U
./ ",.' I ()J
r. '1 ~ 1 ;j; . 1 J:! N :j 1 ~ ~ ("' ~
1jO I IN n' ;~ . "1.\1\ ,~~),
"~~m'n ';'~J":\";';'''I'j~J..-, 1j':" \/l,"
\ ". N ..)1.... )
t:4... .~2 .' _ ~.~ _._..!!I~ "
lJNI\.THSI II'
2
1010
. .. --.-
.- ,- - ..., -~-
I
J
!~
J
rn~~,
.. - -..- ;0'0
.'
..,
Rs
.\
~I
NI
.. ;, I
.... '~r
...),
~I .., I
"-
"j . - 5
r.
..,
~o
&1 ! -.-
'2.
I ~(1 I
;:::; I. "?O
/.
I.?(J 7
J N
~I
r,
.J
.,
-,
~I
.1 r, !
a 5
lO
, .~."
ct: r.
u ""'"
, .'3.1
'!:!
~) I
~
~
1
,
'.
{
"
:i
~d
.>
.:(
}~
tf.
~
ld
...
2:>
n:
<..:>
..-
i.
~i
t
,
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and ZONING
OWHER
APPLICANT
p\ L \ c... E \ 1J 1-\ r.... tJ t3 8,
fQ I~ 0 uJ ~ R. E V CJ C..A\ B L. E
AC\3-ll1
Lup93-2r
',Ru S T
pnOPEnTY DEsCntPTlOH
LAND USE PLAN
ZONING
La T Li}
G Lc. ~J El~L"'r't---J E5TAi E$
FnOM
U t--J C L ,.\ .~.:. ,.', \ \':' \ \.: U
COIJllfY R-3
0.22
AcnES
nlCIIT OF WAY
TO
(.:{. ee;, D ~-.N T I,'} '- L 0 {.U
RS 6
ACRES
PLANNING I'nd ZOHINO BOARD
CITY COMMISSION
SE.CTIOH
'1..L{
TOWNSHIP 'Lq s
RANCE 15'" E
ATLAS PAGE 308 B
. SInol. Family
..
~h
J ~
..
I
I
I
I
.
"
:..
~.
en
>-
'"
m
,
(J
L'
.
'U
.....
::l
I:)
" .
"I "tl
C~
"d
@ "T1
-....
.-1 ='
., ~ 0
~ CI ~ .
'" tl c.- .. -d
.... ~
U
CO . Q^'f 1l~U1 t-
el)
'"
~
g
.
Ll
VI
P
...
::J
0
\..'
--
I
I'
I
G I
P ;'
~#
--------
,I.i::,
'l~,/. " .
I ~/'~1 ~~ .
';"f~,':,: :
.' hP'Il:i.
Ilod~, , I..
.. .1;' ~Y"f'
I~I ij '1,
, l!iflt;.;J,'
~
',' t'. . v ~ '. .
. ,',f<
:~~'" ,
AGENDA
I{)_
1- q~
.3"
iTEM
#-'2
; , .J; . f . .' , , ;,..' . "c '., . ' " ~. . .'
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date: ____
I ~. Je/'7/93
SUBJECT:
Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment, and Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2060-
2066 Range Road; Owner: Bryan P. Kehoe; 0.70 acres m.o.1. (A 93-20 & LUP 93-27)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION:
Approve Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment to Industrial Limited, and Zoning
Atlas Amendment to Limited Industrial for part of Lot 11, Pinellas Groves {Parcel Nos. 12/29/151
70182/100/1100 & 1103 and pass Ordinances No. 5467-93, 5468-93 and 5469-93 on first
reading.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located on the north side of Range Road approximately 820 feet east of
Hercules Avenue. The applicant wishes to annex to obtain City sewer service.
The property is developed with two existing buildings on its eastern portion, and a building and
garage on the western portion.
Pertinent information concerning the request is summarized in the tables on page 2.
The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this application on September 14, 1993,
after which they unanimously endorsed the proposed Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment
to Industrial Limited and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Limited Industrial to the City Commission.
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Originating Dept: ~ t::a
PLANNING ~~L'pMtN'
Costl:
$ NIA
Total
Commillion Action:
D
D
D
o
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
Approved
Approved w/conditions
Denied
Continued to:
i
I
,f:t",~
'\- \E
Advertised:
Date:
Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE
\..j 0 Not Required
Affected Parties
1m NotiHed
o Not Requi red
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
A ttachmentJ:
ORDINANCES NO. 5467-93, 5468-
93, & 5469-93
LOCA T I ON MAP
(2.0--
Appropriation Code:
o None
^
~. Printed on recycled paper
'.' . ,. ,..' ~.A" ; '. ...,'. ,-
A 93-20 & LUP 93-27
Page 2
LOCATION
IN CITY
OR
COUNTY
EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE OF
APPLICANT'S AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY
ZONING
ACTUAL USE
Subject
Property
North
South
County
Industrial Limited
M-1
East
City
Industrial Limited
IL
Industrial supplier (Florida Airgas)
and commercial (Bargain Center)
Outdoor vehicle storage
Mixed commercial (Weaver
Industrial Park)
Vacant Bldg. (formerly Bay
Armature & Supply)
Commercial (Gulf Coast Music)
County
City
Industrial Limited
Industrial Limited
M-1
IL
West
County
Industrial Limited
M-1
DESCRIPTION
ZONING RESTRICTIONS
IL
REQUIREMENTS
20,000 sq. ft. min.
EXISTING
Lot Area
Eastern portion:
Western portion:
TOTAL
17,200 sq. ft.
13.520 sq. ft.
30,720 sq. ft.
86 ft.
67.6 ft.
1 53.6
Lot Width at setback line
100 ft. min.
Eastern portion:
Western portion:
TOTAL
Depth
Building Coverage
100 ft. min.
200 ft.
60 % max.
Eastern portion:
Western portion:
+ 25%
::I: 21 %
OTHER AGENCY REVIEW
AGENCY
YES
I
i
NO I
!
j
i
X J
I
I
X I
Pinellas Planning Council/Countywide Planning Authority
Florida Department of Community Affairs
ABBREVIATIONS
IL
M-1
Limited Industrial (City)
Light Manufacturing and Industry (County)
i
ORDINANCE NO. 5467-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF RANGE ROAD, CONSISTING OF PART OF LOT 11, PINELLAS
GROVES, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2060 THROUGH 2066
RANGE ROAD, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND
REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE
SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WIIEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on
the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to
annex tile property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes,
and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in
connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF TIlE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the
City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
See Exhibit B attached hereto.
Sect ion 2. The City Comllli 5S i on does hereby cert i fy that th i s ord i nance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby
accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other
dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user
within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning
and Development Director are directed to include and show the property described
herein upon the official maps and f'ecords of the City.
Secti.QILJ.. lhis ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
Tile City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map
attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County
Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and
shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days
after adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
~ /J'/J~
M. A. Galb~~
City Attorney
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
'.1
t
i
.1
j
'I
'1
. I
, "" ,.". .'.'
ORDINANCE NO. 5468-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF RANGE ROAD, CONSISTING OF PART OF LOT 11,
PINELLAS GROVES, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2060
THROUGH 2066 RANGE ROAD, FROM UNCLASSIFIED TO INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendmen t to the future 1 and use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be
reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
Property
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
(LUP 93-27)
Land Use Cateqory
From: Unclassified
To: Industrial Limited
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5467-93.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Jkt
M. A. Galbr ith,
City Attorney
... .,',. ;,";. +<,. :,., ". ~.".';'
ORDINANCE NO. 5469-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
At~ENDING TIlE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON HIE NORTH 51 DE OF RANGE ROAD,
CONSISTING OF PART OF LOT II, PINELLAS GROVES, WHOSE
POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2060 THROUGH 2066 RANGE ROAD, AS
DESCRIBED ~10RE PMHICULARLY HEREIN, UPON ANNEXATION INTO
TilE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (IL);
rHOVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
HIlEREAS, lhe assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth
'i n th i S ordi lIance is f ou nd to be reason ab 1 e, proper and appropr i ate, and in
compl lance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The followi.ng described property located in Pinellas County,
Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of
Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property'
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
(Z 93-20)
Zonina District
IL - Limited Industrial
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5467-93.
PASSED ON. FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to forll and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
'I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
;!,
~ '
.. .
<',
.,>\'<'.,,
Part of Section 12, Township .29 South, Range 15 East, and described
more fully as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, run
North 00017102" East 30.00 feet to a point on the Northerly right-
of-way line of Range Road; thence South 89020'02" East 754.01 feet
along said Northerly right-of-way line of Range Road to the POINT OF
BEGINNING; thence continuing South 89020'02" East along the
Northerly right-of-way line of Range Road 152.61 feet; thence North
00005' 54" East 200.00 feet; thence North 89020'02" West 152.61 feet;
thence South 0.0005'54" West 200.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXHIBIT A
. .:t,,'-:' "".., ,': '
of"
~. l ,-
','
t 'L
Part of Section 12, Township 29 outh, Range 15 East, and described
more fully as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest cor er of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 12, Tow ship 29 South, Range 15 East, run
North 00017102" East 30.00 feet 0 a point on the Northerly right-
of-way line of Range Road; thenc South 89020'0211 East 754.01 feet
along said Northerly right-of-wa line of Range Road to the POINT OF
BEGINNING; thence continuing outh 89020'02" East along the
Northerly right-oF-way line of R nge Road 152.61 feet; thence North
00005' 54" East 200.00 feet; thenc North 89020' 0211 West 152.61 feet:
thence South 00005' 5411 West 200.)8 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
'.
, "
EXHIB :T B.
i
'I
!:
i
'j
.;
1
13
.,
\,
~
:(.
ti
f
PINELL~
I'")
,...
"317-70'4
t)
~
13/01
-
c
~
1291
13/09
1 4/06
13/07
1.3/032 13/031
"I \L
....
<::I
"I 1150
13/043
13/082 11-10
13/08
"85
~
~
o
1161
1 J/081
o
co
~
~
'NEAVER
~ ~ Cl:l 0 0
~ ~ .... ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- 59[;0-\)12-----------. .----.-.-------.
PARK
1120
a..
0.-
<t
~~
I'
I
~
r')
13/11
DRIVE
o
co
~
"
OW HER
APPLlCAHT
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMEN1- and 'ZONING
AQ3-20
"
. . If"\."
'.\
~;
l:
~
l:I
~.
"\
~;
~.:
i'
"
..
;'!
V E 14 0 l::. ) B
LUP' 93- '17
LAND USE PLAN
ZONING
PROPERTY DESCRIPTlOH
PART LoT l\ '\
? l tJ ELL Y-\ S Go R. OV E S.
FHOM
U N C L-A S c; (F \ CD
COUNTY IV\-I
0.70
ACRES
ACRES
i
I
,
I
,
nlGIIT OF WAY
TO
\NDLJ(TJQ\t1L
.!... I .tYl I 7' E_ 0
P L A tf U I tl G n n d Z 0 ,.~ I t~ aDO A R 0
IL
SECTION
\'2-
TOWNSHIP
29 s
.
C CITY COMMISSION
nAt-lOE \ 5"' E ATLAS PAGE
27\B
tn -:: ~ us, I-J e S S
EXHlI31'l' A
..~ ..:.-
--,
.~
lIJ
.J
-
~
w
:z
o
I
I'
I
a :;', I
.
~;
"fA"'. .
"2a
.l"
IJ 93- 2.0
~
V'\
......
""'
.. .",<
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
'3
j6!IJ/q3
.
SUBJECT:
Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment, and Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2345
Nursery Road; Owner: James E. and Jeanne B. Wagner; 0.31 acres m.o.1. (A 93-18 & LUP 93-24)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION:
Approve Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Suburban, and
Zoning Atlas Amendment to Single-Family Residential "Six" (RS-6) for a portion of Lot 19, Pinellas
Groves Subdivision in the Southwest % of Section 19-29-16, and pass Ordinances No. 5445-93,
5446-93 and 5447-93 on first reading.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Nursery Road and Excaliber Drive,
approximately 1,770 feet east of Belcher Road. The applicants wish to annex to obtain City sewer
service for an existing single family residence.
The Countywide and City Future Land Use Plans show this parcel as Residential Suburban. The
zoning classification for the adjacent subdivision (Premier Place) to the west and south is Single
Family Residential "Six". It is proposed to assign the property a Future Land Use Category of
Residential Suburban and a zoning of Single Family Residential "Six". Ultimately, however, this
property will be placed in one of the proposed Residential Planned Development zoning districts to be
developed as the Pinellas Planning Council Consistency Program is completed.
It appears that not all of the abutting portion of Nursery Road has been previously annexed. Public
Works recommends that the phrase, "together with the abutting right-of-way of Nursery Road", be
included in the legal description in the annexation, zoning and land use ordinances.
The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this application on August 17, 1993, after
which they unanimously endorsed the proposed Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment to
Low Density Residential, and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Single Family Residential "Six" to the City
Commission.
Pertinent information concerning the request is summarized in the tables on page 2.
Reviewed by:
Legal .-
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt_
CIS
ACM
Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Originating Dept: ~~~
PLANNING & ~YfP,ENI~
Costs:
$ N/A
Total
Commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Deni ed
o Continued to:
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
Advertised:
Date:
.+
.Ir:'~\ Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE
..'1J
[J Not Required
Affected Partias
r8I Notified
[J Not Requi red
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp_
o Operating
o Other
A ttachmentl:
ORDINANCES NO. 5445-93, 5446-
93, & 5447-93
LOCAT ION MAP
Appropriation Code:
o None
."!,.
~~ Printed on recycled paper
A 93-18 & LUP 93-24
Page 2
EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE OF
APPLICANT'S AND SURROUNDING PR PERTI ES
LOCATION I N CITY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
OR CATEGORY ZONING ACTUAL USE
COUNTY
County Residential Suburban R-1 Single family residential
(2.5 u. .a. max.)
North Cit Residential Urban RS-6 Sin residential
South Cit Residential Low RS-6 Sin residential
East County Residential Suburban E-1 Sin Ie family residential
West City Residential Low RS-6 Entrance into Premier Place
Subdivision
DESCRIPTION
ZONING RESTRICTIONS
RS-41[,~!II!'I!'~!"':ii,li:,'!!l!!'I::ljl'l!i.:I::ll!:iilj::~B:~~':11::.::::1!!!i:i:!;jl:!.i:!:'!:11:llill,11.llilll'I.I:I!
RE QUI REM ENTS:::;:;:;:::;::::.::::,:;aSfUJ.1BSJv1:...NmS,:;:::::::::::::::::;:::
EXISTING
90 ft. min.
:::::::::il!:1':::::::1:::'a:~i!~::I![tl:~::):~I~i~:~:i~::::.t:[~~~~:i:::l:::::::i::::::::::::::
.:'::::::::1!::::::::~:~m~~!::I~::~;::::~li:!~t~:lllll~!~::::il:ll:::~:il:l:!:
11111111~~1'111~
::::::::;!l:I::!:::::!l::;:::l:::::!:::I~I!iill~:::!11i:~l~:::!:lll:!:i::l:llil::::lji!l!:::!:illll!i
3.25 u. .a.
13,500 sq. ft.
100 ft.
Densit
Lot Area
Lot Width, corner lot,
at setback line
3.75 u. .a. max.
10,000 sq. ft. min.
100 ft. min.
135 ft.
OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS
AGENCY
Pinellas Plannin Council/Count wide Plannin Authority
Florida De artment of Community Affairs
YES
NO
X
X
ABBREVIATIONS:
E-1
R-1
RS-4
RS-6
u.p.a.
Estate Residential (County)
Single Family Residential (County)
Single Family Residential "Four" (City)
Single-Family Residential "Six" (City)
Residential Units Per Acre
I
<'!
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
ORDINANCE NO. 5445-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NURSERY ROAD AND EXCAlIBER
DRIVE, CONSISTING OF PART OF LOT 19, PINELLAS GROVES
SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2345 NURSERY
ROAD, TOGETHER HITH THE ABUTTING RIGHT -OF -WAY OF NURSERY
ROAD I INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF TIlE CITY, AND
REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE
SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN,EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on
the map att.ached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to
annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes,
and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in
connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the
City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
See Exhibit B attached.
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City.s Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby
accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other
dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user
within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning
and Development Director are directed to include and show the property described
herein upon the official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map
attached hereto, wi th the Clerk of the C i rcu it Court and wi th the County
Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and
shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days
after adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
/
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
,:,"\'
ORDINANCE NO. 5446-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NURSERY ROAD AND
EXCALIBER DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 19, PINELLAS GROVES
SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2345 NURSERY
ROAD, TOGETHER \H TH THE ABUTT ING RIGHT-OF -WAY OF NURSERY
ROAD, FROM UNCLASSIFIED TO RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the. amendment to the future 1 and use plan element of the
comprehens i ve p 1 an- of the City a s set forth in th is ord i nance is found to be
reasonable, proper and appropriatel and in compliance with Florida law; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
See Exhibit A attached. (LUP93-24)
Land Use Cateqory
From: Unclassified
Property
To: Residential Suburban
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoptionl
contingent upon and .subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5445-93.
'PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as
correctness:
Attest:
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
. ,;;j
ORDINANCE NO. 5447-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
INTERSECTION OF NURSERY ROAD AND EXCALIBER DRIVE,
CONSISTING OF PART OF LOT 19, PINELLAS GROVES
SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2345 NURSERY
ROAD, TOGETHER WI TH THE ABUTTI NG RIGHT-OF -WAY OF NURSERY
ROAD, AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, UPON
ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL (RS-6); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth
in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in
compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County,
Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of
Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
Zoninq District
See Exhibit A attached. (A93-18)
RS-6 - Single Family Residential
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City.s comprehensive plan.
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5445-93.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
~
M. A. Galbraith,
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
""~ ' "
. "",'. -" ". ~. " -: .,~.
':",
. ,.\.
. i
. '.,:
j . .,;,',
.',
That portion of Lot 19, Pinellas Groves Subdivision, as recorded ;n
Plat Book I, Page 55, of the publ ic records of Pinellas County,
Florida, in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 19, Township 295, Range
16E, further described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of
the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 19, Township 295,
Range 16E, and run North 89009104" West, along the 40 acre line
606.62 feet; thence South 003715911 West, 33.00 feet to the Point of
Beginning; thence continue South 003715911 West, 135.00 feet; thence
North 89009'04" West, 100.00 feet; thence North 0037'59" East,
135.00 feet; thence South 89009104" East, along a line 33.00 feet
south and parallel to the 40 acre line along Nursery Road, 100.00
feet to the Point of Beginning, together with the abutting right-of-
way of Nursery Road.
. :i
EXHIBIT A
. :$5 ~11fl~.~1~~j~t'~.;
.~a,~
: ;f)'~~ ~o UNTHY/.
)t ({ I \
'~'~~r \\ 4 ,~ /
~~ !l U c 3, -- .~ "\ :)
1:tf;' ~ ('2))
tf:! ~ 1480 (......... 4~I
: a(. ~ .pJ. 1.. - ._-
'r~~ 1 3 14 tJ 7
. rllj...: 2 G
. ~~.,~ ------'.',,- ~ ~ ~!(~-
~ 149J
.~~ /I U )_
':r.~ n:
. .W t-
;~. RS T.
J )1 3
u
. ~ 4 (,0
t.,(_ _..
" I. ..... ,. ..0
.., /" 0
"-. ~ t,"J ~ / --.-..... --'- -------
. " - ~ ~ IIJ2 CY- UNIT 544
.1 ~-)\/ )
5~)n 0 I' jj -/'/ jl
'.. .,.' -l
1468 - '- ~._~____n ~ - -----.-.- 545
- -\{!i ",I~;~ ~ U3lJ I I 39
U --'-'.-..
557 6e 14.16
3 l~ ~Hi
f-=-1 I.~:.cb ..---.--- ----.~_. .....
I i4' /I 15
- ~ --- -.--- ~
01414 556 568 /I 10 ..(
0 9 CO :t 547 8
--- ~.. --_._--- - - - ..._----
rLl 118/ Ii !'O 1451 --. -- -. _._- - Vl
14 41
en ~ 5S:i 569 5 4 ~l
2 0 10 (H)
(}~ 14(17 -----
(f) - I/.'HI --------
~ -------.-.-
o
oD
//91
_~,-. '_5~^',,_
I \'1..--.-
.:_~~~ .._.._. c; ~ 1160
/lU':J / )..J 5'"2
(3t}~24. ..J
1. -L-
N\.)Q.c:.e.~y
RD. ~ R S ~ 6
C\EAJIWA lIR
"/
551
, I .
I i I f I - ]
i I
. I )
II 11 I ~ j
I,
II I
I ! I J I ()
:;
" .1
'.
l
,'" 3.). 'l) I I I
101
49~
IIjS
495
496
" 39
I" 3
497
I' 47
549
II!, ,
550
1'10
o
C)
~'~)O-I.H1' r--r-
- - -:'-,--:- OJ I
~ r-.. lQ
. l'l I ~l I ~ I
I 11 7
A
"
VILI.,\CE
:~ j I h
!; t' II )() '1 11 I
!~ 1
.'~ l 1 (~ . ] I I ~? j
l I
~ ,;iiJ 1';111
:rr1-11 h~~
t!
u
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
LAND LJSE PLAf'J AMENDMENT and ZONING
(] W t~ E n
APPl.ICAHT
l (J 1\ () IJ c. ~ ,) l:~ ';'. .\ 13
)
A <13 -18 LlJP Q3-2.Lf
LAND USE PLAN
ZONING
PflOPEnTY OEscnlPTIOH
PART L D '\ \ q )
P I t.J ELl- A ~ (',. Q D'J C 5 'S W I I Ll
filUM
COlJrlTY (z.1
0.31 Acnes
'-) t,J C. l. ~, ~:; " l I. I l I)
n I (~ II T 0 F 'II ^ Y
TlJ
HE'SJ DE-vTJ,'JJ~
5 ({ d Ll. r< LJ /'f AI
AcnE5
\ ). I:)
r:
'.;
P L A If HIli G "n d Z 0 '4 I till U 0 A 1\ ()
..'" ~..~~-." ~~:._~~'~~. L' .... ''''c i;"~-~o M M 19 S IOU
L. (1 s n A 1/ (] E 1 6 EAT LAS P A a E
:3 17 A
9E.CTIOH
\ ("{
TOWtlSlllP
__..._______ .._______.~_._~ 4_.. .__.____.___..._.__________
. Slngl. r.mlly
",,-
r ,
ah
~ III
~
~
I
I
I
'-----
/
A CC3-( 8
", "
~ .
, .
" : ~"::~ F::
'.' :.
n_..
'/:
MACFARLANE FERGUSON
ATTORNEYS oS. COUNSELORS AT LAW
III MADISON 6TRE:E:T, SUITE: Z300
P.O, BOX 1531 IZIP 336011
TAMPA. Fl.ORIDA 3360Z
18131273-4Z00 FAXe6131 213.4396
210 SOUTH MONROE: STREE.T
P.O, BOX 82 (ZIP 32302'
TAl.l.AHASSEE:. cLORIDA 3230Z
(904) 2i!4-1i!IS FAX (904) 2i!Z.8eZ6
October 7, 1993
.~s. Cynthia Goudeau
. City Clerk
City Hall
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
Re: Church of the Ascension - rezoning
Z 93-10 and LUP 93-26
Dear Ms. Goudeau:
:'-"':"'.'-;:u
, . '. ~ <'".;
)U '. /!f
400 Cl.E:VE:LANO S1'RE.E:T
P. 0, SOX IGag (ZIP 346'7'
CLE:ARWATE:R. Fl.ORIDA 34615
(01:31441-6966 FAX 1813/442.8470
:339i!0 HIGHWAY 19 NORTH
SUITE: ISO
PALM HARBOR. Fl.ORIDA 34684
(813) 185.4402 F'AX 1813/765-0135
IN REPLY RE:FE:R TO:
Clearwater
VIA HAND DELIVERY
I was advised today by City staff that an error existed in the
advertisement for the referenced matters, which will necessitate
continuing tonight's hearing. Accordingly, we will not be present
and I would appreciate your giving me a call tomorrow as to the
rescheduled date.
I would greatly appreciate it if at the beginning of the
meeting an announcement could be made advising those present that
this. item has been continued. I have tried to reach everyone from
the Church who I believe might be attending, but because of the
size of our congregation there could be others there and I would
not want them to sit there unnecessarily.
Thank you for your assistance.
HSC:koh
cc: Church of the Ascension
C:\WP51\DOCS\GOUDEAU.LTR
SincereAY yours,
/ :
~(\~
Ha~ S. Cline
-* /Lf
vn b\J e J -f-o
;~-~'.,
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
15.
I tern #
Meeting Date: ____
/6/'7/93
SUBJECT:
Application for Amendments to the Future Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas for 1260-1266 Bay
Parkway, 300-322 Watkins Road, 1263 Waters Avenue, and 301-317 Pinellas Street; Owner:
Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc.; 2.21 acres m.o.1.
(Z 93-11 & LUP 93-28)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION:
Approve the Future Land Use Plan Amendment to Institutional for Lots 3 through 11 and Lots 15 &
16, Block B, Westover Subdivision, and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Public/Semi-Public Planned
Development for Lots 3 through 16, Block B, Westover Subdivision, and Lot 4, Barnes Subdivision,
and pass Ordinances Nos. 5465-93 & 5466-93 on first reading.
[J and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property takes up all of the block bounded by Waters Avenue, Pinellas Street, Bay
Parkway, and Watkins Road except the three lots at the northeast corner of the block. The applicant
is requesting the rezoning to permit the development of a Cancer Care Center. The proposed clinic
will not have facilities for overnight care of patients.
At present, the City's Land Development Code does not have a Public/Semi-Public Planned
Development District. Upon approval of the Consistency Program, scheduled for September 16,
1993, this district will be added to the City's Land Development Code.
The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this application on September 14, 1993,
after which they unanimously endorsed the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Plan to
Institutional and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Public/Semi-Public Planned Development to the City
Commission.
On August 12, 1993, the Development Review Committee reviewed and approved with conditions
the Site Plan for the Cancer Center. The conditions of approval are listed on page four. The site
plan included utilization of Waters Avenue as a landscaped buffer along the west side of the
proposed development. Morton Plant Hospital intends to request the vacation of Waters Avenue, a
Reviewed by:
legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
K.~~1ty
N/
Originating Dept: -,- rV\ D
PLANNING &~E'O~M~N~
COItI:
$ NIA
Total
Commission Action:
o
o
o
o
Approved
Approved w/conditions
Denied
Continued to:
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
~:w- -J
City Manager
~
tJ; IJI
Advertised:
Date: 8/31/93 & 9/9/93
Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE
o Not Requi red
Affected Partiel
Ill! Notified
o Not Requi red
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
A ttachmentl:
ORDINANCES NO. 5465-93 &
5466-93
L DCA Tl ON MAP
Appropriation Code:
o None
^
,.~ Printed on recycled paper
. . "~' " . '. . w .
. '0 ". I J. .' .' ,', , . .,'. "'.
" ,',1",':,(1...".,,,.,.,.,,:,,.,. ....,.I'~".:-....~ --,_.....
.. '..
, "., .... ,.
Z 93-11 & LUP 93-28
Page 2
City street having a 33 foot right-of-way. Property Appraiser records indicate that 17 feet of the
right-of-way of this street was previously vacated and dedicated to adjacent single family lots within
the jurisdiction of the Town of Belleair. The site plan also utilizes the north ten feet of the right-of-
way of Watkins Road. This ten feet will be utilized together with the required five foot landscape
buffer along the south side of the hospital's property. This will provide a landscape buffer of fifteen
feet. The land to the east and north of the proposed development is owned by the applicant and is
part of the hospital complex. The final site plan will be submitted to the City Commission for
approval at the time of the second reading of the ordinances for Future Land Use Plan and Zoning
Atlas Amendments.
Pertinent information concerning the request is summarized in the tables below and on page three.
,
I
i
'j
I
I
EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE OF
APPLICANT'S AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
LOCATION IN CITY FUTURE LAND USE
OR PLAN CATEGORY ZONING ACTUAL USE
COUNTY
Subject City "A" Public/Semi-Public P/SP Hospital Parking
Property
City "B" Residential/Office OL Single family residential,
vacant, and office
North City Public/Semi-Public P/SP Hospital buildings and parking
South Belleair Medium Density R-1 Single family residential
Residential
East City Public/Semi-Public P/SP Hospital parking
West Belleair Residential Urban R-1 Single family residential
ABBREVIA TION:
OL
P/SP
R-1
Limited Office (City)
Public/Semi-Public (City)
Single Family Residential (Belleair)
:'
Z 93-11 & LUP 93-28
Page 3
ZONING RESTRICTIONS
D ESe RI PTI 0 N 0 L PSI P ill_I
R EQU I REM ENTS R Eau I R E M ENTS
............RsmuIREMENT.....'....,
.:::::::::::~:::::::::: ..' ". '.: . :," :.'. '.;;: ::::::::;:;:;:::::::::::
:;:::;::::::::::::::::::.;::.;.;.;.;.:::.;.:.:.:::.:.;.;::.:.:.:::.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:::.:.:::.::::::;:::::::::;:::::::::
Lot A rea 6 , 000 sq . ft. m i n . 1 a c re mi n . :,:,!!~~::"!~!!:::!:II!!II~:III~!!!II:~!!!ll~!!!lll!1!!I!!11!il:I~!:!!:
Lot Wi d th at 60 ft . m I n . 1 0 0 ft . mi n . tliffll!l.
setb a c k Ii n e
D e pth 8 5 ft . m I n . 1 00 ft . m i n . ':::!~!::,:I~II!I::~.:!:~!!!!I!!:i:!I:!!!:!i~l:gl:'I!11~:!!!:!!!1:~:!:!!~!:~1:1!:!!::~!:!:1!:!!:1~::!~
s etba c ks . Itlllllll
.
Stre et 2 5 ft . m I n . 3 5 ft . m i n .
S i d e p ro p e rty I I n e 1 0 ft . m i n . 1 2 ft. m i n .
Re a r p ro p e rty I I n e 1 5 ft . m I n . 2 5 ft. m i n .
H e i g ht 2 5 ft . m a x . 5 0 ft . m ax . :~:!!~:!::~I~!:!:!.:!:~!I!!!lil:I!:I!!!!:!!:~:!I:llli!~I~!~::i~:i!!!!ll::!~!!!~:~il!!i:!i~!!i!:!!i:i!:li::
FI 0 0 r Area R ati 0 0 . 3 ma x . 0 . 6 5 m a x . :':!ii~:i:!~l:I:!:!!I::!!!!!i!!:~I:!j!!I!!!i!!III~!1111!!:i!!!!!!!!!:iii!I:!!I~I!jll!!:j!!!!!!!I:!!!!!:
0 p e n S p a c e ....
Fro nt ya rd 5 5 0/0 m i n . 5 5 ot'o m i n .
Tota I I ot 3 0 0/0 m I n . 2 5 % m i n .
M ax i m u m 8 u i I d i n g 3 0 0/0 4 5 0/0 1..'1_
Cove ra g e
OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS
AGENCY
YES
X
X
NO
Pinellas Planning Council/Countywide Planning Authority
Florida Department of Community Affairs
1. Prior to certification, the Dumpster Requirement Form must be completed and returned to the City
Sanitation Department.
Z 93-11 & LUP 93-28
Page 4
MOTION: Lou Hilton moved to approve the final site plan subject to the following standard conditions of the ORC,
City Commission, Planning and Zoning Board:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
1. Signs and fencing/walls are subject to separate review and permitting processes.
2. The requisite building permits must be procured within one (1) year from the date of certification of the
final site plan and all requisites certificates of occupancy must be obtained within three (3) years of the
date of certification of the site plan.
3. Prior to certification, the preferred site data table shall be shown on the final site plan indicating
required minimums and maximums.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. If structure requires or has installed an automatic fire sprinkler system, a FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONNECTION shall be installed a minimum of 15 ft. from the structure, adjacent to a paved drive and
within 30 ft. of a fire hydrant assembly.
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
2. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the dumpster/compactor must be visually screened,
and gates must be provided with a minimum 12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Sanitation
trucks.
3. Prior to certification, a copy of the SWFWMD permit application is to be provided to Engineering Site
Plan Review.
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit is to be provided
to Engineering Site Plan Review.
5. Backflow prevention devices must be installed by the City with applicable fees being paid by the owner.
6. Prior to certification, the existing drives that are to be removed shall be shown to be replaced with curb
and gutter and sidewalks.
7. Driveway design shall be revised to accommodate minimum sanitation truck turning radii.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
.'.
1. Sidewalks are required adjacent to all street rights-of-way.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAG EMENT
1.
Prior to certification, a Landscape Plan in compliance with the Land Development Code requirement
shall be submitted for approval by the Environmental Management Group.
I
I
2.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, applicant shall acquire a clearing and grubbing permit and a
tree removal permit (or a no tree verification form) from Environmental Management.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall provide to Environmental Management and
Engineering an approved copy of all necessary local, state and federal permits that may be required.
4. Prior to certification, stormwater calculations and retention area details shall be submitted to
Environmental Management.
5. Prior to certification, the interior landscape islands must be adjusted to provide additional protection
to trees to remain.
The above motion was unanimously approved by DRe.
4
ORe 08/12/93
":,,.:r >.. :'>:.\:,'"
ORDINANCE NO. 5465-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY BOUNDED BY
PINELLAS STREET ON THE NORTH, BAY PARKWAY ON THE EAST,
WATKINS ROAD ON THE SOUTH AND WATERS AVENUE ON THE WEST,
EXCEPTING THREE LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
THE BLOCK, CONSISTING OF LOTS 3 THROUGH 11 AND LOTS 15
AND 16, BLOCK B, WESTOVER SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESSES ARE 1260 THROUGH 1266 BAY PARKWAY, 300 THROUGH
322 WATKINS ROAD, AND 317 PINELLAS STREET, FROM
RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE TO INSTITUTIONAL; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future 1 and use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be
reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
Property
Land Use CateQory
From: Residential/Office
Lots 3 through 11 and Lots 15 and
16, Block B, Westover Subdivision,
according to the map or plat thereof
as recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 25,
of the public records of Pinellas
County, Florida. (LUP 93-28)
Section 2. The tity Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
To: Institutional
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board
of County Commissioners. The Director of Planning and Development is authorized
to transmit to the Pinellas County Planning Council an application to amend the
'.
"
;.',
'. 'I ,'- ~.......,..", "....'p....:.... , '.:'
"
,.
. ':" .'
i. '
,','., ,.\
. ,
1'.
...~ ,~
L
Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan
Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended. by this ordinance.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
. A. Galbraith, J
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
'1. '
Zonina District
ORDINANCE NO. 5466-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING
CERT AI N PROPERTY BOUNDED BY PI NELLAS STREET ON THE
NORTH, BAY PARKWAY ON THE EAST, WATKINS ROAD ON THE
SOUTH AND WATERS AVENUE ON THE WEST, EXCEPTING THREE
LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BLOCK,
CONSISTING OF LOTS 3 THROUGH 11 AND LOTS 15 AND 16,
BLOCK B, WESTOVER SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESSES ARE 1260 THROUGH 1266 BAY PARKWAY, 300 THROUGH
322 WATKINS ROAD, AND 317 PINELLAS STREET, (PARCEL A),
AND LOTS 12 THROUGH 14, BLOCK B, WESTOVER SUBDIVISION,
WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 301 THROUGH 309 PINELLAS
STREET, AND LOT 4, W. N. BARNES SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1263 WATERS AVENUE, (PARCEL B), AS
DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM LIMITED OFFICE
(OL) AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC (P/SP) TO PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (P/SP PD); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance
with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is
hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
Property
Parcel A
Lots 3 through 11 and Lots 15 and
16, Block B, Westover Subdivision,
according to the map or plat thereof
as recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 25,
of the public records of Pinellas
County, Florida.
Parcel B
Lots 12 through 14, Block B, Westover
Subdivision, according to the map or
plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book
18, Page 25, of the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, and
Lot 4, W. N. Barnes Subdivision,
according to the map or plat thereof
as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 76,
of the public records of Pinellas
County, Florida. (Z93-11)
;..........
From: Limited Office (OL)
To: Public/Semi-Public Planned
Development
From: Public/Semi-Public
To: Public/Semi-Public Planned
Development
, '"'
j
I
.\
j
,
.j
. i
c I
1
'.f
'.j
!
I
t
,
. ~
~ '..
i
:1
\
I
,
i
1
i
1
i
I
.1
.....:.
~ d
'j'"
~>: . ~. i > .
'.(,'. \ .. .
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use category set forth in Ordinance No. 5465-
93 by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioner.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Approved as to
d correctness:
..~
M. A. Galbraith,
City Attorney
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
---------.r=.j E ~~O ~ OS
:1
..,
l
,
s~ ~.
"l
~o (; t 12ft
36 35 I 5 ~ -1 3 2 w 2
34 ~ e 6 J 7 110(- ~ 1113
~~ ~ - ~c- _~9 -< 1116
J 2 10 C) 11 1117
.A:.t ,.. l.A
~
."
P/sP 21/15
PIS d
-<
:>
ao
1.S. 7 MOf1 rorl
yJ
-"
PLAtH -<
....
IlOSPI T.".L ~
31
30
29
28
~_ 13
14 15
~ w:, 16 17.ft-
1E171a ~ 12J~
SADLER ST. ~
23 22 2~Bo
." 40
-.-
1 2/03
or-
3~ OL
4 I
L()
5
1117 1 ~
(f) 2_~
~ IZL3 7 0
~ I U6 8 ~
~ 1233 9-~
12/(
l
12/1 .;
ill
12/141
HO'S?
~
~
PINElLAS
r=
~
-<
.
16 1 t;
...
15 2
011 J
- r-
. y. 1'1 10 9 a 7 6 4
_D-_~
1 5
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and REZONING
'---
,ow t~ E R
APPLICANT
tv, 0 R "\ 0 N P L f\ I-J r ~\ 0 S PIT A L
ASS oc, } \ t.J c....
z q"3-\(
L U p' q '3 - z53
LAND USE PLAN
ZONING
pnOPERTY DEScnlPTlOH
I' P I I LoT S 3 - \ I y. I ~ 'C., ) (. , B c... \.{ B
\ . (, I /\~
F n () ""'
II J1 ' IUd L. I.f
~ E"; \ C) ;: u T {II L- ( 0 r F I (. t:
\' 11 II
OL
.( [1 "
I' f) II
LOT\ \:1.. - II{ . OL'" B
wE'>ioVG:a.... O:;uo,
LoT U) B" R. /.J E. (" L> V 8,
I
o . (, 0 tr<i
i
r /':.. p
TO
::r NSil TIA.. TI()N/'tL-
PIS? P 0
10"1 tH. '2. '2 \ A en E S
P LA H N I t~ G n n d_ Z 0 N J N G [lOA ~ 0_______.._____[ C I T Y CO J.( MIS S 10 H
S E. C T 1 0 ~~ 'L ~ TOW N S ~11 P 1 q S RAN 0 E \ S E ^ T LAS P AGE "'3 0 5 1:)
. SlnQI. Fnmlly
? \0: C:; r A Q k \ N G
/
------
"
c.
Ii
\JI
(1)
Ii
~
;0
p.
;u
Po
I
I
I
I
.
01T
~t6
Lak~ Ave.
? '"'C;) U
Q 1:1
'1
t.:
...'
,..
~'J
P.
L'
c:
I~
It,
I
rt
o
I
\JJ
'"
.-:
W
I~
p.
~
U/
'I
<1> I
s: I
VlI
,.. I
,
\
\
Highland AVtl.
n
.....
<11
..-;
IV
,...
~
I.).
u~
"
-...,
'\
,
\
\
I
o I
//
H~rclll'!J
ac::)
"'"
"
d
!\c~r.e Rd.
:N
r~
,\ve.
0
D
Oc:?
o
II. S. 19
C:)
~
2..
~- "
D
VI
:.u
."
o.
<:)
-
C)
;0
~,.
--
n
;,(1
'0'
')
I I -
L93-28
~
c::::;::)
o
.~
-0
-1
rt
~'
VI
....'
1.1,
tV
l.allllinJ rk
n
c::
'"1
>-
.It
:;:
:AI
C.
/
-,'
'.
. ,
,,}',
" ~.
;;.. .. :
'::i~~
;,,-.
It)
AGENDA
DATE
9,"~
ITEM #
~
--!Cf:) ~3
.........-...--..--- ......,. ...
,.
t
.1
SUBJECT:
Approval of Downtown Development Plan, Periphery Area Plan, and associated Ordinances.
-
C1.earwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
(t, ·
Item #
Meeting Date:
10/1/93
:.~
>:
:~
~
~~
,
,
.,
>
~J
<,
RECOMMENDA TION/M OTI ON:
Approve Downtown Development Plan and Periphery Area Plan, adopt on second reading Ordinances
5297-92, 5298-92, 5299-92, and 5300-92, as amended, amending the future land use map from
various classifications to Central Business District, adopt on second reading Ordinance 5301-92
amending the zoning atlas from various classifications to Urban Center (Transition), adopt on second
reading Ordinance 5302-92 amending the zoning atlas from various classifications to Urban Center
(Transition), adopt on second reading Ordinance 5303-92 amending the zoning atlas from various
classifications to Urban Center (Eastern Corridor), adopt on second reading Ordinance 5304-92 amending
the zoning atlas from Public/Semi-Public to Urban Center (Bayfront), adopt on second reading Ordinance
5305-92 amending the zoning atlas from Public/Semi-Public to Urban Center (Core), and adopt on
second reading Ordinance 5235-92, as amended, amending various sections of the Land Development
Code concerning the Urban Center zoning district.
[J and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
On February 4, 1993, the City Commission gave preliminary approval to the Downtown Development
Plan (Community Redevelopment Area Plan) and passed several associated ordinances on first reading.
On August 16, 1993, the Commission confirmed that it desired to proceed with the Downtown
Plan with incremental changes necessitated by changing conditions since first ordinance reading.
Staff has revised the Downtown Developnlent Plan according to this direction. Major substantive
changes are listed below.
~ The measures of success section on page seven has been revised to reflect: specific
retail/entertainment floor area increases anticipated between 1993 and 1998 and; to revise the
references to 1992 to 1993. (Note: The Downtown Development Board downtown space
inventory project was anticipated to provide precise floor area figures for existing Downtown use
categories. Due to lack of accurate data, the inventory did not provide this information.
Consequently, instead of expressing the measures of success for the retail/entertainment category
Revi cwed by:
legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
4r
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Originating Dept=--r--.M 0
PLANNING & D~P'E'I\ \
Costs: S N/A
Total
commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Denied
o Cont i nued to:
User Dcpt:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
L~
Advertised:
Oate:
Pape,":
o Not Requi red
Affected Parties
o Notified
o Not Requi red
f~ing Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Appropriation Code:
Attachments:
ORDINANCES: 5297-92, 5298"92,
5299-92, 5300-92, 5301-92,
5302-92, 5303-92, 5304-92,
5305-92, and 5235-92
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PERIPHERY AREA PLAN
MOTIONS TO AMEND
-tZ-GV
o None
."fa
,w Printed on recycled paper
Downtown Plan
Page 2
in terms of a percent increase above the "base" floor area, the staff simply substituted a specific
floor area amount which would serve as our goal for increases in this category.)
~ Figure 4 (Drew Street realignment options) is deleted since development of this figure is
dependent upon consideration of the entire Drew Street improvement project.
~ The discussion of the Special Transportation Area (ST Al on pages 1 5 & 16, and Figure 6
illustrating the proposed ST A have been deleted. The recent ELMS III legislation effectively did
away with the ST A approach and substituted a relaxation of concurrency requirements in
redevelopment areas. Staff anticipates modifying the Comprehensive Plan in 1994 to revise City
concurrency requirements for transportation consistent with the intent of the ELMS III legislation
which is to provide a relaxation of transportation concurrency requirements in highly urbanized
areas.
~ On page 18, under design issues, the paragraph suggesting that the Maas Brothers building should
be removed has been deleted. Also on this same page, under assembly possibilities, the sentence
referring to public land uses on the bluff which do not take advantage of harbor views has also
been deleted.
~ On page 21 , under both design issues and zoning issues, language has been added to reflect the
possibility of a "Main Street" design approach being included in the Urban Center (Core)
Subdistrict.
~ The entire addendum to the Downtown Development Plan has been deleted and replaced by the
attached Periphery Area Plan. This change allows the land use and zoning changes associated
with the plan to be considered on a separate track from the Community Redevelopment Area
(CRA) Plan (i.e. the Downtown Development Plan).
~ Appendix B, which provides a summary of previous Downtown Development Plans, has been
deleted due to its length. It simply did not make sense to staff to include this lengthy appendix
in a document considerably shortened by other proposed changes.
~ On page 69, Appendix C, implementation schedule, changes have been made to several
implementation activities to reflect the current time table.
~ Appendix D, beginning on page 71 has been modified to provide additional detail regarding
possible use of CRA funds.
~ Appendices E, F and G have been added to illustrate proposed parking garage regulations,
establish a relocation policy and provide a legal description for the Downtown eRA, respectively.
In addition to the Downtown Development Plan and the Periphery Area Plan, there are associated Land
Use Plan, zoning, and Land Development Code amendments. The zoning amendments involve only two
relatively small areas which would receive either Urban Center (Transition) or Urban Center (Eastern
Corridor) zoning classifications. These are the northeast and southeast expansion described in the
Periphery Area Plan, respectively.
The Land Use Plan amendments associated with the project involve the four expansions listed in the
Periphery Area Plan. These areas are proposed to receive a Downtown Development District Land Use
Plan classification, the same Land Use Plan classification that the CRA portion of the downtown is
classified. Ultimately, the proposed Downtown/Mixed Use zoning district would be applied to these
areas. In the interim, Q1lY City zoning district could be included within this Land Use Plan classification.
','n",. ~,' ". ,
,
.', i,F;\,,'\
'~
Downtown Plan
Page 3
A motion to amend the Land Use Plan amendment ordinances is attached. These motions to amend
simply change the name of the Land Use Plan classification from Downtown Development District to
Central Business District, consistent with the Pinellas Planning Council and new City nomenclature.
Finally, there is a Land Development Code amendment associated with the Downtown Development
Plan, this amendment is a substantial revision to the Urban Center zoning district requirements. The
intent of these changes to the Land Development Code is to bring the Urban Center zoning district into
closer compliance with the requirements of the Downtown Development Plan. Major features include
expansion of the conditional use section to reduce the "anything goes" use categories currently in place,
creation of a new Urban Center (Transition) subdistrict, and modification to some dimensional and
numerical requirements for the Downtown (such as setbacks and amenity area requirements).
'1
i
i
1
,
A motion to amend the Land Development Code amendment ordinance is also attached. This motion
addresses the issue of Code section numbering since the City Code has been recodified since the first.'
reading of this ordinance.
I
I
':::~.i.:~ ).:;;:L i: :i~~; :":'~ ;,:d!r.,\,,'.;'.. 'l.{;:'" T ,;,~,'.':"":
".:
o ~'
"
, ':' ,
" :1" I~'
! \,
" "
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5297-92
1. In the title, beginning in the 3d to the last line, ,delete "DOWNTOwN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER II and insert II CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT."
2. In Section I, after IITo:"
.
change: Downtown Development District/Regional Act vity Center
to read: Central Business District
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5312-92 was ad pted amending the name of
the "Downtown Development District/Regional Activity District" to the IICentr.al.
Business District.1I .
.i
. .
ORDINANCE NO. 5297-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTH
OF JONES STREET, WEST OF OSCEOLA AVENUE, AND SOUTH OF A
LINE LOCATED 100 FEET SOUTH OF CEDAR STREET, AS
DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL, RECREATION, COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES,
INDUSTRIAL, AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
, '.!
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth herein is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
Property
See Exhibits A and B attached
hereto. (LUP 92-1)
Land Use CateQory
From: Low Density Residential, Medium
Densfty Residential, High Density
Residential, Recreation,
Commercial/Tourist Facilities,
Industrial, Public/Semi-Public
To: Downtown Development D~strict/
Regional Activity Center
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
".'" :" ,"
~ ' :,;
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board
of County Commissioners.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Approved as to form and correctness:
February 4, 1993
. R ita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
. - '-'..'~,., ",,' ,
; -. .,.'
. "
,':
.
. .'
\.':<
,:, }
.' :"'~:1
,',I
I
- '-, ' ~ , < .' ,,' .~,.:, "...,'", 'JJ'".t\'.l,lr< .
"
:. ~,
'" ' .~
. " ...,. ',~'"
.,:
From a point 20 feet East of the Northeast corner,of Lot 1, Gorra
Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 44, as a POINT OF
BEGINNING; proceed West 950 feet to Point "A;" return to POINT OF
BEGINNING; thence South along centerline of North Osceola Avenue to
intersection of Georgia Avenue; thence West along centerline of
Georgia Avenue 100 feet to intersection of North Osceola Avenue;
thence South along centerline of North Osceola Avenue to
intersection of Jones Street; thence West along centerline of Jones
Street to mean high water line of Clearwater Harbor; thence North
along mean high water line to aforementioned Point "A.II
EXHIBIT A
, :T
0" .~.i
FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
~
Part of Lot 1, Block 2, J. A. Gorra's Subdivision
FROM COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL
ACTIVITY CENTER:
Part of Lot 1, Lots 2 and 3, and land to West, Block 2, J. A. Gorra's Subdivision
Lots 13, 14, 23, part of Lot 22, and land to West, Sue Barco Subdivision
Vacated streets
Lots 15 and 16, Sue Barco Subdivision
FROM RECREATION TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER:
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 42.01 and 42.011
FROM PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 42.02
Lots 17 thru 21 and part of Lot 22, Sue Barco Subdivision
FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL
ACTIVITY CENTER:
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 42.03 and 42.04
Lots 1 thru 9, Eldridge Town House
Lots 2 thru 6, Bidwell IS Oak Wood Addition
Lots 10 and 11, O. Harrington's Subdivision
FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 43.04, 43.05 and 43.06
Lot 12, O. Harrington's Subdivision
Harbor Bluffs Waterfront Condo
Lots 8 thru 11, A. B. & Jennie Cate's Subdivision
Lots A and B, Clovis C. Lutz Subdivision
Block 1,' Jone's Subdivision of Nicholson1s
EXHIBIT B
~
..'
./C
co..,
~~~~,;;:{: .'!i.: :'? (:'-(.~~~~:~' .:,:' ,,'
. H~Rii6ii;'})tUFr~
WATERFRON'l';,.
~!~{!~!~4.~~1{~t~;;'~id:,
4,/U1
UC (8)
I ,~..:::L- "';..J .ir--=-....l--.' '.,1 ...~
-l' 'or.rv I...~ k!!." lit I c~___
00
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,It Jot
!~
'0' ...
.k .r
10. ::
I
2ND
,
,",
e..'
.,.
...
...._tl.
')/.)
@J
"
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT
OWNER
f
I
rY\VL'T\PLE.
Clr'l- of C.LE:AR\.UATEQ.
APPLICANT
LAND
USE PLAN
FROM
L-Ou..'j lVI€:o,u'''' ~ HIC.t.l O€tJ"i,"TY
QG::~ IDGIJ-r'AL- AoJp CGMMI .,.F',
,uvuS,-RIr:ji.- I "f'vl:>L..IC- -;~~.l. "'....VI-Ie...
TO
OO\..tJ~TOLA..JhI
o 8J €'l-O? M ~ lJ\
r L'" 1m 1/1 0 tI n d :z 0 fll PI 0 0 0 A It D
SECTION
TOWNSHIP 1. q 5
RANGE
o~
;;....
.....\1
. I',
LupQ2-1
pnOPER,y DESCRIPTlOH
\00 Fr $01.." H D FeE. tlC\R. ~\
NO~IH of ..lCt"ES ST
\JJ E. c;.,. 0 p ~ 05 c EO L-).., A V
N
b'
In
o
1 17.0G AcnES
'>
l.1J
tX
CITY COMMI:JSIOH
I S" E
ATLAS PAOE 277 8
.;:,......
.\".
..........
;:.
.;
'. ;,:' ". "
. .
''',f.
..,~.
, . "\:",:' >
,,'.; ~':. t':~>:.J '~:..,..- ,"'..'W.
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5298-92
1. In the, title, in the 2d to the last line, delete II DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTERII and insert IICENTRAL BUSIN~SS
DISTRICT.II
. ','
2.
In Section 1, after IITo:1I
Downt~wn Development District/Regional Activity Center
Central Business District
,:1
"'J
. '.:.:.;
. ..<\
change:
to read:
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5312-92 was adopted amending the name of
the IIDowntown Developlnent District" and "Central Business District." .
, , '
'J
.. .', /.~
ORDINANCE NO. 5298-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED SOUTH
OF NICHOLSON STREET, NORTH OF JONES STEET, EAST OF NORTH
OSCEOLA AVENUE, AND WEST OF THE PINELLAS TRAIL, AND
LOCATED SOUTH OF MAPLE STREET, NORTH OF JONES STREET,
EAST OF THE PINELLAS TRAIL, AND WEST OF MYRTLE AVENUE,
AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM
RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES TO
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
i
I
1
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of "'"he
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth herein is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
See Exhibits A and B attached
hereto. (LUP 92-2)
Land Use CateQorv
From: Residential/Office and
Commercial/Tourist Facilities
Property
To: Downtown Development District/
Regional Activity Center
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
, ,
... :~1
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County'Board
of County Commissioners.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
.
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
.I
I
/
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
.... < >~ "'.~ -/\,::><'>f.''':(:i~';;;::~L;'l~.~:I).:~:''
"" " ".
""".""- .
,
Commence at the intersection of Nicholson Street and North Osceola
Avenue; proceed South along centerline of North Osceola Avenue to
intersection of Georgia Avenue; thence West along centerline of
Georgia Avenue 100 feet to intersection of North Osceola Avenue;
thence South along centerline of North Osceola Avenue to
intersect ion of Jones Street; thence East a long Jones Street to
intersection of North Myrtle Avenue; thence North along centerline
of North Myrtle Avenue to intersection of Maple Street; thence West
along centerline of Maple Street to the West boundary of unplatted
property i dent if ied as "Pi ne llas Tra il; II thence Norther ly a long the
West boundary of "Pinellas TraiP to intersection of Nicholson
Street; thence West along centerline of Nicholson Street to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXHIBIT A
:....~J..;__.L_ __~ _':~_.'._" _ _' _..2~,-,,"~~~:'.-.......~\' I,": .'". of ,""\,
I
I
. I
"
I
j
FROM COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL
ACTIVITY CENTER:
. I
,
I
Lots 8 thru 10, F. T. Blish's Subdivision
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 41.05
Lots 1 and 6 thru 8, Sue Barco Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 7, F. T. Blish's Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2, E. P. Merritt Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 3, Little's Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1, J. H. Rouse's Subdivision
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 43.01 and 44.02, and vacated alleys
Lots 13 thru 24, Bidwell's Oak Wood Addition
Lots 1, 4, 5, 7 and 8, O. Harrington's Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 3, A. B. and Jennie Cate's Subdivision
Lots A and B, Bergden's Replat
Lots 1 thru 7 and part of Lot 8, Nicholson & Sloan's Addition
Lots 1 thru 10, Hart's 2nd Addition
Lots 1 thru 3, Fort Harrison Subdivision
Lots.l thru 10, Block 3, and Lots 1 and 5thru 8, Block 4, Jone's Subdivision of
Nicholson's
FROM PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 41.04
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 44.01
Lots 2 thru 4, Block 4, and Blocks 9 and 10, Jone's Subdivision of Nicholson's
Lots 2, 3 and part of Lot 1, Reed's Subdivision, and vacated streets
FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL
ACTIVITY CENTER:
Lots 4 and 5, Little's Subdivision
Lots 7 thru 12, Bidwell's Oak Wood Addition
Lot 9, o. Harrington's Subdivision
FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 43.02 and 43.03
Lots 2, 3 and 6, O. Harrington's Subdivision
Lots 4 thru 6, A. B. & Jennie Cate's Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2, Jane's Subdivision of Nicholson's
EXHIBIT B
;,
" -f
, '1
. v'
'-',~.
1.' .",
'~','~'... .
.' '".
~~
"
FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 41.06
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, and Lots 6 thru 10, Block 2, E. P. Merritt Subdivision
Lots 5 thru 8, Block 1, and Lots 9 thru 18, Block 2, J. H. Rouse's Subdivision
Lots 25 thru 36, Bidwell's Oak Wood Addition
Lot 9 and part of Lot 8, Nicholson's & Sloan's Addition
Lots 1 thru 19, Hart's Addition to Clearwater
>,
-:1
. . i
. '. . I
1
,
. j
:.d
: I
. ""
/
. . . . I
':'1
. I
.
FROM INDUSTRIAL TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER:
Sec. 9-29-15, M&B 41.03
Lots 6 thru 8, Block 1, E. P. Merritt Subdivision
Lots 19 thru 21, Block 3, J. H. Rouse's Subdivision
Lots 37 thru 48, Bidwell IS Oak Wood Addition
J
42/01
)S/R
,--
~ ~ llAHHlNGTON."
1\ 5-77 ...
1
I\AIWOH DLUn~
WATE/lF/lOIlT
carlDa
21-':31
}r.MU..U,
j~... (t ~~~"l~!i:'
}7.l!:#t'\:;i:~'\ OJ
.,.-' :..' .1
[__7~_~"":--<-';] G;l-~r - -----~_..
.", ," ....'_a..'. .--' - -- -' r rml-'hr-...-."
... -. .--]'-- T:i: I~::~~ ::~;:; L "'~ ::~:::l; :::: ;:.::"'
,::'0 · e 1 ,:1:1 · "'R:;: I ej' l II
"';- '16' (Ge< (:- at -::~f - 7' ~~
~ to;- l"l -"5 -. ,'- --;;; -- - -
i _t I 1 .3 4 ~ :::I:l'''' 7 1 I
".ltIi!!;~!s~l~J.. ~;,~b~,,;;:.. L;:;:I:1;: ,.
_ -==C!lCn_ _ _ _ ___
. .---- - - ----
2
--- ,.--
..", 10 .)
;...-;-, ~)-;-.
.,.,--
e ~
loll ) 6
~,; 1/ = ~ I ~
...
1\
-.r 10 (~
~ :
: J
10-
~'9
.11'0
iW"--
. .
7-
~
't-
. 6
'" 11 ii"---
-;1-
~r-~
'., 10 9 J
;;;i-;-I.~' .
;;;;JT:j'~ -
~ t "
,,~ -
_u"""t ,.
@ Qii. ')
~., )1 U
.c
lO
~
_ 25
'e "
21 10
II
1
t
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT
OWHER
"PPlIC"tIT
lur91..- 2
p nop~n TY DES en II' i' 011
SOLJT~~ 0 F N I CI~O \... SoW
l>lOQ...1'1 ol=" jc:;>IJ€';:-:>I
, 0 A -~T 0 F NOS <:;. E. 0 l A A V
\...n:$"T of pi N ELLAS- ""'I~A IL5
A\J1.:> SouTI-1 of /Yl.qPLE. 51
NOP..TII of ~Of.Je.c. >-r-
EA('T orl'l"'EU-A4~RArLS
wE'n of fY\'tRiLF AJ 4'3. ~2. At\\~5
CliY COMMISSION
MULtIPLE
c. \ T Y 0 F c...L EAR W t.. T E: R.
LAND USE PLAN
FROM
RESIDE""\.1TIAl.. lor-FreE.. E\
cotvltv\ERclP.L I IF
TO
00 W t.J Tow t.]
Q"E.V E LOr N E)J1
PLAHtOtlO end ZOtllNO OOAnO
J
TOWHSHIf> 'l. q (l
"AUOE
IS- E
AllAn "....OE 2778
Se.CilOtl
oq
o 8lngl. Fllmlly
11
"\I
0-
(0
-
o
-;:.
w
~
. ',J' ,,,,'.... " "
'::::~(';,;g
':
'; ;'
,
. .'
. .
'.' . e' <-. ,.. . ".'t .~ ,:!~~. . ..,..
, .
. -, .... . ..,.,:"
: ,~. :-'/';"" ."'...;....~..:..: ,-~.\..~'i.... ..,~ ; i.. ,''('
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5299-92
1. In the title, beginning in the 3d to the last line, delete "DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER" and insert IICENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT.II
2.
In Section 1, after IITo:1I
change:
to read:
Downtown Development District/Regional Activity Center
Central Business District
NOTE: On Septelnber 16, 1993, Ordinance 5312-92 was adopted amending the name of
the "Downtown Development Districtll and "Central Business District.1I
, .,,"
;,.
_ .,."'......
':4,
ORDINANCE NO. 5299-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED EAST OF
FORT HARRISON AVENUE, SOUTH OF CHESTNUT STREET, WEST OF
EAST AVENUE, AND NORTH OF DRUID ROAD, AS DESCRIBED MORE
PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES
AND RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future 1 and use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth herein is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
Property
Land Use Cateqorv
From: Commercial/Tourist Facilities
and Residential/Office
See Exhibits A and B attached
hereto. (LUP 92-3)
To: Downtown Development District/
Regional Activity Center
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
1
'1
I
'I
I
i
I
I
,\
I
, '..... ,.! 1'..',-",,,<. (t ,'" '~',
,'.
.; '.
"',
;~ '
. -(
,: >~.:~
..:1
;
I
I
','1
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board
of County Commissioners.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
,
. .~, I .
'l"
f ,..... ,"
. ,~ .
. " ,
:".
" ,'/
-"....' :",;"i,..'.
'1'_ ..::, r.' ,
<,',
",' \ '"';
. .l' >\,,.. ~~. :..1,. ".j-' ",,, .~: .;.:: '
_ ','."
..'
: ~
- '.', .n....'
Commence at the intersection of Druid Road and South Fort Harrison
Avenue, proceed North along the centerline of South Fort Harrison
Avenue to the intersection of Rogers Street, then East along the
centerline of Rogers Street 190 feet, then North to the intersection
of Chestnut Street, East along the centerline of Chestnut Street 240
feet, then Southerly 175 feet to the intersection of Rogers Street,
then East along the centerline of Rogers Street to the West boundary
of Lot 1, Block 19, Magnolia Park Subdivision PB 3-43 & 1-70, then
South along said boundary to the Northwest corner of Lot 10, Block
19, Magnolia Park Subdivision, thence South 65 feet; then East along
the North boundary of Lots 6 through 10, Block 19, Magnolia Park
Subdivision, to the intersection of East Avenue, then South along
East Avenue to the intersection of Druid Road, then West along the
centerline of Druid Road to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
(.
EXHIBIT A
'.' , ".". to,;" j;, ~.,~,. ,.", '. ;. ';i.'"
" .
...J::...
" ~ .
',..>,
"
, '....
, '. . - ~ '; -~
.
FROM COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL
ACTIVITY CENTER:
Sec. 16-29-15, M&B 41.02, 41.03 and part of 41.04
Lots 1 thru 3, Block I, Lots 1 thru 10, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 10, Block 3, Lots
1 thru 9, Block 4, and Lot I, Block 6, Wallace's Addition
Lots 1 thru 12, Marshall & Brandon1s Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 6, Mrs. N. E. McMullen1s Subdivision
Lots 6 thru 10, Block 19, Lots 1 thru 10, Block 20, and Lots 1 thru 4, Block 27,
Magnolia Park
FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
"
:, J
Sec. 16-29-15, part of M&B 41.04
Lots 10 and II, Block 4, and Lot 1, Block 8, Wallace1s Addition
Lots 7 thru 10, Block 27, Magnolia Park
;,'"
EXHIBIT B
.
,
t
). '''''~l
I
":::1
6 : I '0
7 1.-\0 I
~ ~f:.J' ~-~-'l~j
-,}.\-'- -9 i\'-
'(>"U
lifl- S. Nil'
. ., ') .
tR .. -r -.
luzqlJ. i J I
L..
. ~ I .
:~ ,6)
'] I
~!.
,~
'7
;":-g~
GO~ I
, 6nll ~
, · 0:
u:
0(
;I;
IS P
11/01
:'::H)O~
70.
7nl
; 1; I
lIJ Cfl(SCErJ r- 'l
:-~15-;l-:~'1
lJ' "9'
I 10
5-131 ?o....
Igj
.1,-] ...
~ ,~
~ ~.J
~
on
'"
;~ -l~-I --1
I I ,- I
i ; 6 I 41 :;>
]7 ; ~~ I .D
,_!_J
"
~
"- ,no
)8 .If. I J~
r I
'd "'9 6:
,~
t
,,0
u,
~
~
~ ~: ~ ~ ~'O r~ i!) I" I ,I ~ I,,: r
, . '~ C 'I ~ ~ -. - ,~ j I
.' . '~~'-! ~ - (IlJL.---
~ ;J'\ i:i' g I '" :'-1 '[ 7 C r.
s>~;~H:~ ;:~ ~d l_ ~ _E _ ~ ~_ __~,
STREET c.
o.
~
~. ROClRS
'~-'....__.
'l~<<i;:'~" ;
~~, .:....>:.5 ,; ~'
~~~,;:~.7~~~
..-~.~
"[6
..
.'
~,
..
Q'
d
- .-.~...._~
~., ';::i' ~'
"
~
~ ~
~ g P1
,. ... ~
..
" ~
,
~ 60'
"~f,:::{~,~:',<~
~I~ij
Ii~l~~~
:',~ ~:.,. ,....~r-._.. ~':"
.~. :;a. 5t; .:.~. ~ ~
};~ 50\ ,:,:\1;;:; 0:0
,- .
Q
C'
2
3 4
5
~:~f).;;i)i:i~ti:1~:~, ::.j.H~~:j'
.. I . .':'.; ..;.~~'
if~~;iJ.~~ .::;!~'r
10..9 :]!);-:-
~ ~ :: ~ ~
-C N--- :'1:; 10:' ~l
-" -1- ,~ -
-.--.-----..
o .." 'v, ,....
to ~ t;.o Q t,)
to. h. ,... I..
1 2 I) 5? ~,I
,I;' L -~
IjI.2J'~ r-: 6 :'; :'
I ~. ,
c ~. g ~
D D J" l,U tb 07-
. ,.. ,.. ~ ~ ~ 15
- .
'O~
fj
L,07
..
I
;~ ;o~
g II
~
:J
~
:.101
I
~
:tCG
DR V \ D c, HO/,O
fi1l'-'~
~: __;_ ~, _~ ~I:. ; I,'.~..)t..:?'~-~
____~_. ~_ _ PIWFESSJONM.
~,~- ~-Ql L'=-1~~~
~O;--i: 11 '0 9 ~ I 1
S I . j 03:' -1- -_.\- -,~Ii}.- CEt\TI~H CONDO
o ,...... . .
VI (, 'I 18 1:'.11 n
_:i
-:;;
o
~
I rl-r~rQTLT"1 ~l-I
3m" 6cj J - 4_ .~- 'j l.~tj'
~ '-' "J-:;
::... ,~I I to
,~ Il I'~ 9 0 7 6 ~ ;l~
~ I ,,~ 1 r; "}:,; }~ I ; ~: ;; - I
r- ~ '"1
U~ I (3 i i.... iE I :.
::>> ... tI p'
~!):'~. 19M
If 01
DIWIIILL
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT
ow HEn
.APPLICANT
FAO,",
TO
tv! IJ L'\ \ P LE.
e. \ 1'''-1 0 r- c. LEA R llJ ~,. t3 p_
LAND USE PLAN
LUP <17.- :3
N
0"
t<l
rnOPCIITY DE!iCRIPTIOII
SoulH of cH ES'IIJvT ~I
),J ORiH Or D R\JI 0 R..O
GA\;"r of S rr ~A.RR.\<;OU AV
wE'.T Or t;;'AS,' AI..!
R.ES\ D E"tJ\' I A L I 0 \--1""1 C. E ~I
Co co M "", cR. C I A l- IT""
o
ODuJN-rOWt-J 'DE:vr::~OPM€,r-l'"
'>
w
~
let.q I ~CRES
\6
--'r CITY COJ,AMIS~IOH
II ""lU C \ 5" c ~ T l.. ~ G P A 0 E 2. q .5 B
!i cellON
f'L~IlNIUG end 201l1llG IlOAIIO
TOWU:>lIIP
-z..q !i
o SlnOI. fnrnlly
'" .
~ '. t
',,, '
.J,' :
... . :
,., ,'.' ~' "
. , " -.
":.. , :.;' . '~,' ~ ;
,"
'.:"'--' "',.
. ,'" " " "
". ','1
. :,. ,
.~. ~ .".f..
'~
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5300-92
I
1. In the title, beginning in the 3d to the last line, delete "DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER" and insert "CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT."
2.
In Section 1, after "To:"
,
change:
to read:
Downtown Development District/Regional Activity Center
Central Business District
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5312-92 was adopted amending the name of
the "Downtown Development District" and "Central Business District."
, ,
).;. .~";;, "~ .:;,....i;:'.ii~.\j~.~.;;.;"'":, ,~. .~~iJjil..::.:..~>.;.:\;;;
;l
ORDINANCE NO. 5300-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED EAST OF
PROSPECT AVENUE, SOUTH OF DREW STREET, WEST OF GREENWOOD
AVENUE, AND NORTH OF GROVE STREET, AS DESCRIBED MORE
PART ICULARL Y HEREI N, FROM COMMERCI AL/TOURI ST F ACI L ITI ES,
RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth herein is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
Property
See Exhibits A and B attached
hereto. (LUP 92-4)
Land Use CateQory
From: Commercial/Tourist Facilities,
Residential/Office, and
Public/Semi-Public
To: Downtown Development District/
Regional Activity Center
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Sect ion 3. Th i s ord i nance sha 11 take effect imm'ed i ate ly upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board
of County Commissioners.
PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
~
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
" ~ ,T
. ;
.' ,i
LEGAL:
Commence at the intersection of the centerlines of of Drew Street
and North Prospect Avenue, then South a long center 1 i ne of North
Prospect Avenue to intersection of Grove Street, then Easterly along
centerl ine of Grove Street to intersect ion
Avenue, then North along centerline of North
intersect i on of Drew Street, then West a long
Street to POINT OF BEGINNING.
of North
Greenwood Avenue
center 1; ne of
Greenwood
to
Drew
"
EXHIBIT A
,,,t
;" \. ',', .
~' ;
, . j ~ :~;
.':"..'....,
~','. ~i;;
, ;.:;
. ~'. '. .. !' .
"}
~ ,; ..
, '
" ,
.. ;. " .' "
'.,1
, .. . .
, ,. ...
'" >: .~,.~.'-'.t':"..:~(i~, ,..'~..
. . L
. '.!
." ""'.., ". ,. "'. '.^' :~f.
FROM PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, R. J. Booth's Subdivision
',Lot 6, Block 1, Sarah McMullen's Subdivision
FROM RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 6, R. J. Booth's Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, Sarah McMullen's Subdivision
FROM COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL
ACTIVITY CENTER:
Lots 6 thru 13, Block 6, R. J. Booth's Subdivision
Lots 7 thru 10, Block 1, Sarah McMullen's Subdivision
",
. . ~
r f--
~, 22 2
j910 1 2
I ~~
mlj'
...~ -)
or , lo
kTI5 16 ;~
. ~ i
;:;: 0 , ~
1\ ,
,
12
,
g 1:&
~I ~;: I, E 1 ~ d
@--- 1 ~
9 ~O t /1'6\ ~~
.. t 0
:i; t ..
I 1
2
9 If"
I ~
~ I
LAURA
SUB (3)
1-41
-
;;
CLEVELAND
~ I 4 I ~ I 60 I ~ I l' ~ J I:: l~ I I ~ I --..\ .0
dr 4. ,~ 6 ., 8 I I 2 ::! I 4 5 L ~ ., e I ,10 -_, I ~
J>- -- ..P.~ 2' ""to: ~- ~'::
" ~" "tJ W\2d 19: Ie! 111 16Tt5i-.::f;";! ~ 11 1-4-11!.. --. 'I
~ li'''1 I ~Ol : \ il-701 J i 11"1"! i " l ~ ,a
~ i fl. 11 ~ . ~ i 60' i . I ; : :!. . 2: I
~_--L.. _JJj~., .--. T-' ._~ ... ----J
PARK ____.. _~ ..",~... ,:.T W ~.,. :-;>~,._,. : ~..' 1 ...=-
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and RFZONING
OWNER
APPLICAtlT
t <?l-l.{ . LUP'i2.-4
IV\U l-"T\P LE.
C.\i~ of CL6AltWA-i"co...
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
SouT~ oF' t>RE:w ~T
NORT~ of CRovE sr
eA<;T Q'F PlI..o$PS<-T ~v
wGc,T o~ (;R.EetJWool>
'-LAND USE PLAN
pIJ81..lCl S~MI- Pu\3.\.\~ I
RE''ZIPI!V1'IAc.../OP'FIC.&
Co M""'ElI.c:.1 A~ I IF
FRO....
ZONING
P/')9JOL
~ eN
TO DO W I\J "0 uJ N
D~v ~LO~ ""€.f.JT
PL~NIlItlO Dnd'ZOtlIHO DOARO
SECTION '!>
S 81n9" FDmlly
\Jeer')
l.{.o5" AcnE9
CITY COMMISSION
TO WI{ SlllP 2.9 s
n....Hoe 1 S- E
ATLAS PAOE '2..B7 A
';~;
, ,.
"
'",
, "
~
JOJ
JOI
14
loe
"
ZI7
I
I
I
15 '
"J
16
;; ! I
::"'.+o,t' "
1 . 2 ;)
_L.,.<:5
-~~
_\..~ 15'
;'e_. ~<t
~~~,
0; '2
e:: . .
, I
; , ~:I
'I
:
I
,
i
I
,
I>,V
.'
. . ,":: .' . ,".. ~.o.:..:\: "'i".;,.
\....~
~
I
" t'"
;
""
ORDINANCE NO. 5301-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING
CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF PROSPECT AVENUE, SOUTH
OF DREW STREET, WEST OF GREENWOOD AVENUE, AND NORTH OF
GROVE STREET, AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN,
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC AND
LIMITED OFFICE TO URBAN CENTER (TRANSITION); PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance
with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is
hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
Property
Zoninq District
From: Neighborhood Commercial, Publici
Semi-Public and Limited Office
To: Urban Center (Transition)
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
See Exhibits A and B attached
hereto. (Z 92-4)
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use category set forth ;n Ordinance No. 5300-
92 by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioner.
PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
, .,"
, ,
'.
,',
'l. "
" ~ 1
, . .' I.
, ,
"
LEGAL:
Commence at the intersection of the centerlines of Drew Street and
North Prospect Avenue, then South along centerline of North Prospect
Avenue to intersection of Grove Street, then Easterly along
center 1 i ne of Grove Street to intersect; on of North Greenwood
Avenue, then North along centerline of North Greenwood Avenue to
intersection of Drew Street, then West along centerl ine of Drew
Street to POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXHIBIT 1..
~J!- ,",_ ,:,t
!' ,
,:. .
"~ '
. i ,;
/
, ,
1,,:'
" ,
, :." . ~ "
, ,
, , ~:,:i
"
.' ,.;t
FROM PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC (P/Sp) TO URBAN CENTER (TRANSITIONl (UC/T):
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, R. J. Booth's Subdivision
Lot 6, Block 1, Sarah McMullen's Subdivision
FROM LIMITED OFFICE (OL) TO URBAN CENTER (TRANSITION) {UC!T}:
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 6, R. J. Booth's Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, Sarah McMullen's Subdivision
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (eN) TO URBAN CENTER (TRANSITION) (UC/T):
Lots 6 thru 13, Block 6, R. J. Booth's Subdivision
Lots 7 thru 10, Block 1, Sarah McMullen's Subdivision
EXHIBIT B
. :, ~ ':;.,,;".':"'i;..),ii.,~ ", .
"
-\CNr--
-2 $'- __ JONES...
.- ~ ,J.29.. -l.B~ ~ ~ g i
" ~a:> 107
- - t!ll, 6. < 28 19 to. 20 _19
.1 AZOl 1- -,- -
, ~ZOO I l 65 I 27 20 to.
- 14 C z
;) I-- i-'- )01 66 f5 to. 26 21 10' 10S
2 I E. ~ I==- -f~r- 1 2 .3 i
" 67 I 25 tH '3 22
: ~ ;:)0 ~ e ~ g ~ 0.." ~..
... .... ; ~ ..0 II) lID .., 40 .. 01
~ l1iJ~ -L g
; ...~_ ,.-. - r"I --
J)() ~ i i ~~ ~~ ~ ~
S 4 3 2 1 30 22/031
i' l~ 22/04 22/03 22/01'"
~ 1 2 2 2 i~ 22/02 /36
111,~ (~6 ~ LJ~l EYI 2 I
IHB i ~~,~ ~ ~! ~ .,;
..tl ';; _ t 2 ~9 2 ~ l~ 12; iQ
... ).. 8 10 II -3 1J 14
k~ "Ill:~ - - SARG;
<> ~ LAURA
, I: 1
, ~ lz
1
~ r ~
I ~ dt ~l i I 5 6
- . N'"
9 10 t 161 ~5 ~i 13 12 11
.. j ~J . 0 10.. I
<> t ' lID ~ t
_L--_":::..
; t s:
I !
10' ~ t07
~\
1l 17 16 15 Ii 13 12 11 :5" I 15 l'
_ 10. ~ \z~3
--- -_... - "'- '>6 101 ~ I 2 ;$ --
5 ~(,\7 8 9 10 7. I-- .3 ~ ,5 6
J is tOI
to o~~...-.,:oon.~....~~ ~c.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GO ~ ~ g ~ ~ 2 2
_ __ _ ~ I ~. ,', DR
OREW s: 1 "
'.", .. ' " N' ::1"'" ' '1::'" ' ~' .~' . 40 c; ~
~, eN: '" ; ~ '>:,'~ '" ;~. ai~'"'' ~;\' :. ~ 'i"~' "}j:.' ~ Q . 2i. ,J,,;...: I:: ::
"?2, .1~' :;~{\j:. :.if!:' :~::'0j .:..~..:;., ~\~~; li)T"~:~~: ';r.R ~.:~:~~.
'"" '..', 1!'1l ,5 ".,,' , .le",,",':) ...:1,3"" 1,,/1. ," "I." t,,< ".. n ... .. ..
Ir':~~':... ". .~t(";;~~r'H~ it..;.,~...,f.~.., -:;"., .:~;t ;~(~,;:n~~~.: ".~:.:.~' :," w
~6 '1' ",' ,..>,>,~v,~". 'it1..",',"" ;:;.",",,,", 'ib."~;;'1<; ~".".t'.>:.;i<'- :>
" ,., ;)'t'~"'6,n .:,l>'fi"c 'A 'D"..., ,),'<1'9"//' f8,!Ot:-.d1liJ" ..
" '...# 'S'~ 8 ~".*~"4~~i.'~ lU ~~ ~;~:1\.t/'t'): .iJ~: ::l ~;;;'I ~_, I to
,,:I.. '" ... -~. J~'.:~j~"~)JGtj'~'$; :,;,,~""e' ~'-Nl <'~1--~
I ,,":5,. tv. 'i,,M,. "~~'i~ 'iOta,; ,~,,' ," "):: ,( ~ ~
..a...".,f'~'i' \.."J:,'t~~... &~~~u~; ~~h..>.,~~~ '"~,';",, .,'-:." "'.~ IJ.. E-...!.
CROVE , I L- 5
107 I ~ I c; c; I I; I ~ ~Q -;;-----;-
~O.-~ :: I 2 ~ ~ I ~ '00., I 7r:==C
-N 5 I ;) I 1 ~ 8 II. :
r~ ---,-1. " ~ C~~Nli 10~ ~~;:- L{
" ' I::: 2 Lt' f: ~ ~ ~ iDK--7"
6 II ~ 0 Co 8 0 9 Q CI '''J--
zt __. _"----L~_'___=__ -. ~ I 'i:.o ,."'"7
. ~-~ ~ OR <I'D-II6 STREET 5: ~ Sl _u.c..
:-~ ~ f~~O r.: 1 "~T a T I. 1- I ij ~~;'O,~
~ 9 B :~P:21:" F8~~r:;-\2 - ~411 St'24D~: ~.J~ 2 I, ~I 1,j,~}7S::
~ L-- 4 ,rrr~ Jj-; ::... 1';1 .:,:,\.~,\,,\
g: roo ~ l'O mp J -; ~ 7\-;; - 8 i~ ~ ~.,/'~..)~
~,;::; 6 5 4 5 i ~6r.1 I Sll~ \' ti '....::...\
~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I ~ I -ll i ~ "~ ~o /.f)~
'.',H/" ~ 4231-14og ~
..
, ,
.-'-.-
,.
McMUllEN
.,-~ SUB 0
1-41
..
;:
..
0;
:!:r~: I ....
... to... ~
2 ' ,
; 2 1-.
~--' ~ '
..
smEET
.
'i
tOI
10 9
106
---
10'
7 6
100
~ " ~)
" ;;
;;
~
..
o
2
~
$!
12 11
~ r"\.
,;<I,~'H~
':~ [:1ld hl~ITEI
~h{:ii:6'~'''', '''''7,,'JZI
",~l.;","~it;:'-t.:{ 6. .tX';.L~..., W
<r.if:"':-~9k ~.,',i',','3,'P, ~
.b~U"'C-:t~.~::?".. ,B.~..' ~
W1191 rii~~H!J -<
4,.",,,'" T':r7f1~ I
Sl ~
1"10"
~ Q" 107
.. 22/0~" ~~0J2
r:- -,&
o ,<
05
'- 22/06 I!Li..:s
:; u
60
CLEVELAND
!; I 60 I ~ I T~ II ~ T ~ T I ~ I "
~I 1 2\ ~ ! 4 :; L 6 7\ B I 10 ~ I ~
- - -.RA...Illii2'. ~_ @ I ~
10 9 \29 191 16~ ,,\ 16Tt~I-::r;-~! 121 II 1- 41 I ;.. -'
I .1-!701 J . I HI" I I :.,
..... ;' ,...!; ~ I C'\ ID
:; . iQ i 6fll , : I ;. : ; ~ ~ I
~__.L_ _J--LJ~.LLL.(.._ T--'-~'''--J
PARK _ __.... ..' .,.~ :. ," :.T W q.,\::;o~.,._. :;. 1;' I....=-
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and Rf=ZONING
zQ1-4 . LUP'12--4
OWHEft
APPLICANT
MULTIPLE..
Co \i'1' 0 F C La A Q.. W A- T E Q...
FROM
'-LAND USE PLAN
PUBLIU SEMI. Pue,\.\C- I
RE'<; I PI! \IT 11\1.-' 0 FF'\ c. C
C.OM"'IC~C."~(.. J TF
TO\) 0 UJ N ,0 oJ N
D ~v e,l. 01;) r\-\~ tJT
J'LAtINItIO n nd 20111110 OOAno
ZONING
P/.;t>/OL
~ eN
PROPEnTY DESCRIPTIO,.
5 ouT t-I of" l) ~ E:uJ ~,..
NOR'TH of CRove s\
I?A~"- or Ptt.O$Pe:c...1 AV
wGC,T Or C,REElJWoob
UC(T)
L(.o 5"' ACRES
CITY COMMISSIOH
SJ:.CTIOt~
\5'
rOWt4SIlIP 2..'\ 6
"AIlOE IS- E
ATLAG PAOE l.B7 A
o Glnll'. Fnmlly
301 14
'01
.11' 15
tfl
tll 16
1 2
0 .. 0 .
~ ~:: :
-0 c, I
~.+ o~ "
1 ,2\ 3
_L,~<i,
It ~'\?'
--~
~~I:.r..:
I",~-';
~:)'t-"1
c.: 12
c.: ' ,
b"V
';. ~
".r
",
t.> ,.,
',,- ,."
':' ".;::~~~
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5302-92
1. In the title, beginning in the 3d to the last line, delete "DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER II and insert "CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT."
2.
In Section 1, after "To:"
change:
to read:
Downtown Development District/Regional Activity Center
Central Business District
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5312-92 was adopted amending the name of
the "Downtown Development District" and lICentral Business District.1I
.".!
'/:'1
-j
,":.:;:~; .~~;, .:d.:.:1':';0.:,
ORDINANCE NO. 5302-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED EAST OF
EWING, WASHINGTON AND MADISON AVENUES, SOUTH OF GOULD,
PIERCE AND CLEVELAND STREETS, WEST OF MISSOURI AVENUE,
AND NORTH OF COURT STREET, AS DESCRIBED MORE
PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES,
RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE, AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plar. of the City as set forth herein is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
See Exhibits A and B attached
hereto. (LUP 92-5)
Land Use CateQory
From: Commercial/Tourist Facilities,
Residential/Office and
Public/Semi-Public
To: Downtown Development District/
Regional Activity Center
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance
is consistent with the City1s Comprehensive Plan.
Property
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County
Board of County Commissioners.
PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
JML
M. A. Galbraith,
ity Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
t
1
,"\ ,
LEGAL:
From the intersection of the centerlines of Court Street and South Missouri
Avenue, as a POINT OF BEGINNING, proceed West along the centerline of Court
Street to its intersection with the centerline of South Greenwood Avenue, then
continue West along centerline of Court Street 180 feet, then North along West
boundary of Lots 18 through 20, Block 0, Coachman Heights Subdivision, PB 20-26,
then West to intersection of Ewing Avenue, then North 690 feet along centerline
of Ewing Avenue, then East to intersection of South Greenwood Avenue, then South
along centerline of South Greenwood Avenue to intersection of Gould Street, then
East along centerline of Gould Street to intersection of Washington Avenue, then
Northerly along centerline of Washington Avenue to intersection of Pierce Street,
thence East to intersection of South Madison Avenue, then North 425 feet along
centerline of South Madison Avenue, then East to intersection of South Missouri
Avenue, then South along centerline of South Missouri Avenue to the POINT OF
BEGINNING. ·
EXHIBIT A
. :", ~,r:i
"
,
.""
FROM PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Lots 24 thru 39, Gibson's Clearwater Heights
Lots 1, 2, 7 and part of Lot 3, Janie Daniels Subdivision
Lot 4 and part of Lot 1, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision
Part of Lot 14 of original Lot 5, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision of Original Lots
2 & 5
Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, W. F. Hughey's Subdivision
and vacated streets
FROM RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL ACTIVITY
CENTER:
Lots 2 thru 6 and 21 thru 25 of original Lot 5, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision of
Original Lots 2 & 5
Lots 2 thru 4, Block 1, W. F. Hughey's Subdivision
FROM COMMERCIAL/TOURIST FACILITIES TO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT/REGIONAL
ACTIVITY CENTER:
Lots 4 thru 6, 8 thru 21 and part of Lot 3, Janie Daniels Subdivision
Lot 7 thru 13, 15 thru 20 and part of Lot 14 of original Lot 5, R. H. Padgett's
Subdivision of Original Lots 2 & 5
Lots 7 thru 13, Block 1, and Lots 2 thru 8, Block 2, W. F. Hughey's Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 14, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 13, Block 2, Moase & Harrison Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 18, Mac Dixson's Subdivision
Lots 19 thru 28, Mac Dixson's 1st Addition
Lots 8 thru 14 of original Lot 2, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision of Original Lots
2 & 5
Part of Lot 3, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision
Lots 10 thru 15 and Lots 25 thru 30, Block B, and Lots 1 thru 7 and 11 thru 20,
Block D, Coachman Heights Revised
EXHIBIT B
. ,',.'. J '. . ' '4 , . .....,
.
h ~ ~ '"''&' I n;--;-;--
':l[ "'l:L..."l>
r .
SJll((T
'"
UC(E)
5,/1, 60
::1
?
',.. ; I
"
----r: ~
~
..... ,..
,.
.. ?
51 U t ( E )
'" l~*'J'"
;.~ :::;' ~
lr~ .
','
1 : ~..4.:
,. ,-l.) "-
, t ..:.,.;"V'_ ~
,,~~. I~..,
,. .,~V U f()
..'t-'-~- ~
.~ '2 ,:>'
'? ',i' 1)
... I ..~..
~'z, .
,.
5
1-';[
:.\1'
j' ~ , .. 4..
,.
.~ ...
~ ~
~' , 'J"
:..
" .'''.:
~ <
,-
"~I -,
t c::,.... 0-
J 'Q U"'"~. , ..~
.,... - (,)
, ..-..
.1 I. ~
~
~
, f
\6
t. :1
l'i I l~ I'~; 1 ,
;,~--il~~'d,-;;,~, -
~ "- --.-. C:t'\\- ~
9_.~C.?!'-2).~" :;
,,(
:-.--
--' .'i ~1 ~Z
;:.'-\t~~\;~ _::..~
11)1 :6
1\.
,.j f. ~'?-ll
.....
-!-
;- ~;t-i e
_ _h'!~_.
~~~_.~-
, ~
"
, -;
. ,'8. '.
~ 1 ':l
.'.....'.9
1 ~
~ "J -
- f}-- -
, _.___u ~. ..
_ .... '4.. _ .__...._
. . -- .. - -",-.---.,
: .~..::-~?:... ....._:..;:..-
:.... .......l: I '
,,,.. '~"
_~";~ ,":...:_. ~-=- ,,-..:=...;.nA..-.-:'':".
if ;:
~:!
2~
:~
9
'.:::,1; ,...
\I
,;....
IQ ,..
.
. .-
~.......... .
-.
'-
I~
rOS ...
tQY~'~ 'j-
:!!!-;-
..
"
'r~T
e
1~ i"
19 \.,
~'.
~
t
"
II
~
!i
~
~
i
...
(I
&
,
g
'.i
~
t-
"
~
~
"
(
f
;
';, I : I:.' I:! h
1- t" .. ..
j C (E)
: ~ Iii ] 7)8 9 10 II 12
:[fl i"
r~"t} '[r'.. 1) f2 21 ~O 19 6~:::
! ~ II ~hlD
.1, i ,. I. = I g g g l~ L u 21
. ~_I_~.l:::_.L-..I.. :....1-...
lVP/I(R 0 L
I'" '!i 'f' - :"n" I - " ,. T'!i'r-
i;.;.. '2,' 2 :
i ' " .
. I~ -\ :' 10;' I : 1:' ! 1 \ . t.
" 0r.I 14)
E g ;-
l:~ :"
;
.. ~ .z: :-~ :,) '9
,
'."1
;'111
,~ '16
,."
-;;" ~
l~ " Z
.1'" ~
Ii III W
cr
~111
:40: J'. 1~
~n,
,,'7
GREEN'WOOD MEDICAl
AND REHADUJTATION C G
CENTER 2- ."
J ., I,' ~(~5 5PL:9 R> ~
Ml~H~'n A.., 0 C) "I .-1:(
g I I::; ~ =, 7~
R M 2 8 ," S.1. ." C G
-.-..-.-.... f!r~~~i~ -~Ir:::' ~ ~ ~;:: ~ ~:- ~I-:,' I;' ..: -:':t ~~" "I:: ~I,~::::.:r: ~d~:=' 1: U
- - - . - . -. -' - -. - -. ".' - -,- . - : - - - . - -<;; - - - T .
~ ::: ~. -. " - -15';:- 91/ .1 TURNE - :ST - GR- YES i;,',;-
__I.. ;, I II, 'I ,~!~I :::.ll~"9'1'l111!1~'~~ 1< 1~11' ''1--
.."\ I _I .... . I. " I, ,~"
~
...
.)I/()~
}~~~;~
"z
,
q
'/
'l~
I 1iT1,~
-.:;-1 !'
I ".. ii1/
--U;F"
'.. .- :~~.
-'-i~
"
~
. ..2'3~
lJ[' - j;--
. ~~-.>L
lr), -0
;J
~ ~ Q IV " , ~ . I . -.:. ~ It .':
.. ,
UI ~ '- ... : IJ2 ,:, rr
,
,..A,
'. .. ':1<"r
A"
A"
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN f\MENDMENT and REZONING
OWHER
APPLICANT
mULl \ PL'E
CITY 0 F CL. EAW Ai c
iq1-!f
LUP 9'2..-.5'"
FROM
"lAND USE PLAN
PUBL~CI. S'ENI-'PVELlC,
CC)}o.,11 ME RC\ 'A II TF
RESIDENiiAL aFFlc~
DO\VN"ToWN
{) (\1 E.L 0 P Nd~Ni
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
'SOUTI-\ of CLEVELAND ST
..NOR\-{ of TUR \oJ E~ ST
P/~P aCC' ...EA~T DF EWINC AV
C I J": w'ES, of MISSOURI A.V
UC (E), 31/ .oLf ACRES
[ CITY COMMISSIOH
ZONING
TO
PLAN/IINO IInd ZONING DOAnD
SE.CT10 H
IG
TOW H SUI P -z.:q tl
R"HOE
15 E
ATL.a.S PAGE 2Q S 'B
., Sin.,,, F"mlly
. . .. .
, .'.' '. '."",:", " ,
ORDINANCE NO. 5303-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLrARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING
CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF EWING, WASHINGTON AND
MADISON AVENUES, SOUTH OF GOULD, PIERCE AND CLEVELAND
STREETS, WEST OF MISSOURI AVENUE, AND NORTH OF COURT
STREET, AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM
GENERAL COMMERCIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, LIMITED
OFFICE, AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO URBAN CENTER (EASTERN
CORRIDOR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance
with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Sect ion 1. The fo 11 owi ng descr; bed property in Clearwater, F lor i da, ; s
hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
Zoninq District
From: General Commercial, Neighborhood
Commercial, Limited Office, and
Public/Semi-Public
To: Urban Center (Eastern Corridor)
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Property
See Exhibits A and B attached
hereto. (Z 92-5)
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use category set forth in Ordinance No. 5302-
92 by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioner.
PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-C9mmissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
~
M. A. Galbraith,
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
.:'
;
~ ,
t::'
LEGAL:
From the intersection of the centerlines of Court Street and South Missouri
Avenue, as a POINT OF BEGINNING, proceed West along the centerline of Court
Street to its intersection with the centerline of South Greenwood Avenue, then
continue West along centerline of Court Street 180 feet, then North along West
boundary of Lots 18 through 20, Block 0, Coachman Heights Subdivision, PB 20-26,
then West to intersection of Ewing Avenue, then North 690 feet along centerline
of Ewing Avenue, then East to intersection of South Greenwood Avenue, then South
along centerline of South Greenwood Avenue to intersection of Gould Street, then
East along centerline of Gould Street to intersection of Washington Avenue, then
Northerly along centerline of Washington Avenue to intersection of Pierce Street,
thence East to intersection of South Madison Avenue, then North 425 feet along
centerline of South Madison Avenue, then East to intersection of South Missouri
Avenue, then South along centerline of South Missouri Avenue to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXHIBIT A
. I;
. ...
~:'1
i '~r
j "
.,-,'.;"', ,"\",.,
I,
't'
FROM PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC (P/Sp) TO URBAN CENTER (EASTERN CORRIDOR) (UC(E)):
Lots 24 thru 39, Gibson's Clearwater Heights
Lots 1, 2, 7 and part of Lot 3, Janie Daniels Subdivision
Lots 4 and part of Lot I, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision
Part of Lot 14 of original Lot 5, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision of Original Lots
2 & 5
Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, W. F. Hughey's Subdivision
and vacated streets
FROM LIMITED OFFICE (OL) TO URBAN CENTER (EASTERN CORRIDOR) (UC(E)):
Lots 2 thru 6 and 21 thru 25 of original Lot 5, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision of
Original Lots 2 & 5
Lots 2 thru 4, Block 1, W. F. Hughey's Subdivision
FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG) TO URBAN CENTER (EASTERN CORRIDOR (UC(E)):
Lots 4 thru 6, 8 thru 21 and part of Lot 3, Janie Daniels Subdivision
Lots 7 thru 13, 15 thru 20 and part of Lot 14 of original Lot 5, R. H. Padgett's
Subdivision of Original Lots 2 & 5
Lots 7 thru 13, Block 1, and Lots 2 thru 8, Block 2, W. F. Hughey's Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 14, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 13, Block 2, Moase & Harrison Subdivision
Lots 1 thru 18, Mac Dixson's Subdivision
Lots 19 thru 28, Mac Dixson's 1st Addition
Lot 8 thru 14 of original Lot 2, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision of Original Lots 2
& 5
Part of Lot 3, R. H. Padgett's Subdivision
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN) TO URBAN CENTER (EASTERN CORRIDOR) (UC(E)l.L
Lots 10 thru 15 and Lots 25 thru 30, Block B, and Lots 1 thru 7 and 11 thru 20,
Block D, Coachman Heights Revised
EXHIBIT B
, " '"' ~.,i
.. ,".-: ,:.:.,. ~.'!",,J,'
\... ;. ...~ .!\T-:--;;-;-
'.
" ~---~'--1"
.. .. t ~ :",. I
1 : ~ I 4
- ~()~~
Ie .,\'2 ,
I;:. ,~, '.
'I" ..'
~ .. y.:~
, :.,...'1"-" ,-'
D...) . ~
'? '1' 11
I. . '
UC (E)
r .. - ,..
: .
: ,
$.R. 60
'0
. :
,'.
.. ...
JI " (' ~
". ,).
.f:
. 1 L ~
".5IRt:(1
':Ll, \I\,\.1'o"U
;;
J
,~
'i
:j
~
.~
'9 \,,,
....,
~
~
:{ I'
,
': I
." ,
\'
~
;
$1
.
~ ;
.. II
'r
'~. 1 .
l.-.q
e ; ~
.. :: -
de (E)
.' t:"L
t ....~. ~
.~ I f:~ ~ ~
. .
5 ~ g...
.... - .
Q ~o
')" ~
~ .
..:.
~
r ."
1 ~
'"
.. ,'8..
,: T'
'"
...
;:
~
.
1__~.-.,;
, - -~~--i t
.-i:-
" '~-_:....
. f
16
, .
'1)"-
'. ,,-, ',.,
;;
, -.,..-.-- -. -
- ._.._~. .-..-
: ~~:-:-:~ ~::'::l ~
. ;.... ';'.l~ .~I\-'"
I'...."'..
c,...-:. r...=_..~/'u,,:';:._".
= H
22
11/ ')L.:~
\.e.. .
\ .'~Q
t.. ..-
_ t. y
- ,-0.;'
;c\ ~}/ ,
"//
"c
,~ ~
UI'~\
I/I)~
,~ I
'" \1 ~ ,. .
t~'... 'M
-:+. >r
b ---J5"-,
, .-
~ -"', .
.!~
'I ::)
:: :?:~.L~:-::-:
.. '.--.-:;--. %'0"-' .'
.~ (II JI/ j~"
'.. --~-,--z"
, 26::C JI' :~.
\,..----0.;;1-1'..
, ~. ._:~.: 8~g~ '
- '5 - :. I
::.- .:_-_._~
:a:~ I
~o_._m~--J
'~
<
",
,
t
'~
~
1
.~
i~
,Q t..a
.
'-
"
,
'0'
~~ci-= ....--;
1"~_
"
I:
:.
It
, U i'\
'r~TI
:'.
'2i
,r,;
..
~
,~
!T
. >'0 Co, '1'O~ 0$ 'IJ.''''l1~ ~
i Q = 1:- I ':: :.. lIro "lf4 t }}n. )'J
j c. (~) ; ~ ~ ~ l~ ~
, ~ ! 6 11 15 9 10 11 12 iJ I H
:~~~ i 16' I GREENWOOD MEDICAL
ll.:JC -l- -l "( t. .a, AND REHA8IIJl'AT10N
, I .; L ~ E ,,,
:e \21 ti..5 '. ~J 12 21 20 19 ~: )08::< C NTE!!
--\ \.-.', r II~ IJI/iJ
! . 1 I a ~!,D
, i. ' 1.. Ig :; ~l:; L ~- Jl/I.
.~ ..;_1_L~_1.......l2._I~ 'g._ U I
llJPt,(R 0 L
.,
"
: Jl/11
, "r-
)1/01
"
.., "I
1: ,'P,\I ! ,::1
:: I:) Jh ,
: I ~~ . ~tl/
: I .- "J """'0: n
II "'HS~;;
: I ":. :"'31.~ :!
'I ;: j:.l
..
i
I
I
II" .
-,ifl ,!
~1"
~mr
- -no F
';M' "
.__4
._.~~
!:. - '"
,. ;;,
. ''; . r - ''; , 1- . -- '[-."[-
: ::: ! ~ I
i ," ;; -:
'''\ !'1 10 lit :1:- ! 1 -,; ,.
!
,
'&01
Sf
..,. ....~):-
;n'----.- ';-";I~";r-'"7.r.; ~ t;~""....;.... ",-'" ~I.l r.; -,... -~ "'I..~,~...,.... 011_ """"'''''1 I' 0
: J :: .: =: :: ;: a): I ~ = : =~ ; ~ ~.=:! ~.- : ,= : ,= :; p :r~ ::;:! ~ !r: : : t :, TO'
'::, JI ,., ~ I :::. i ~ , 15~91:i:'! TURNE : ST GRdVES I; ,;,
~'~' ;';1;;"" .~I/'? :'2 !:!1 "~,:;.t7~:'9;t!1I".i't,'~~ 14 '}1" P.ot..-
e }-;-.. J
".
--ii,
7
I
CG
...
.'
. -2),
~
~
1\. 'I ' i : . -:> ~ ~ 9 Cf: ..
-, ,
~ : 02 1 ~ rr
. .,,-. ...
bf' j;--
.~:-:~
.", '0
',.
.",
,~ '16
:.) '9
,~',:. ~
" .., :...
M" ~
"III \.o.,l
a
"
~
."
",
"
..-
.. ?"fr'
;.{
'=~ :..
.. ..- ...
- ..... .."
81.... .
< ..
;:. .
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and REZONING
OWHER
"PPLICAHT
rY\\JLI\ PL'E.
CITY of CLEAWATE:
'zQ'2-5""
L UP 'I '2.- S"
'LAND USE PLAN
flu 6L!CI S!."-il- 'PU9\.1 c:\
FIlOM COlVllV'E.RC\'AL/TF
RE:SIDENi\Al OfFICI::
TO DO\!)N'Tc>WN
o ~\T E. LOP Mt=Ni
ZONING
P/SP, CC.
ctJ,OL
PROPERTY DESCRIPTIOH
'SOUTH OF CLEVELANO Sf
.NORH of TuR \-IE\{ ST
. -EA~T a F EW ING AV
\.0\:51 of M1SSOURC AV
UC(EJ
3l/ .at{ ACRES
PlAHNINO and ZONINO BOARD
CITY COMM'SSION
SE.CTIOH
lG
TOWNSH IP 1,:q S
RAHOE
IS ~
ATlAS PAGE 2..QS8
~ 8'"9" FlImlly
, ;, " ' " ::, ,', : ':, '"" ' ' ,- " ',' , " . " ":' :'" . . , " , : ',. ' , ,', ' ,", :' " :: ,,' ,
4
,
, .
ORDINANCE NO. 5304-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING
CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF CLEVELAND STREET,
NORTH OF COURT STREET, AND WEST OF SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE.
AS DESCR IBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREI N, FROM PUBLIC/SEMI-
PUBLIC TO URBAN CENTER (BAYFRONT); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in thi~
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance
with Florida law; now, therefore,
i
j
i
I
I
I
I
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is
hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
Property
1
Zoninq District
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
(Z 92-6)
From: Public/Semi-Public
To: Urban Center (Bayfront)
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
..
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
.
"
, ,
--- "--- - -. --~- --~.
:"'f.
2, 3, Block A,
and an unplatted parcel
follows:
John R. Davey
more particularly
Part of Lots
Subdivision,
described as
1,
,~ - .
Begin at the Southwest corner of the right-of-way of
Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue; thence South 235
thence West 335 feet; thence North 56 feetj thence
10 feet: thence North 180 feet; thence East 320
to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
feet;
East
feet
AND
M&B 13.06, Section 16-29-15.
EXHIBIT A
~j ~ \ II
.\ 0 ,
i I
.. ,
I
",
J, ' ,
1 \ ~ .
'h
i~ II
ROMPON'S' & BASKINS
_.... -"._"_0_..'- ._.. ____ _ .__.._ _""'_._ . _
57-1
I^
~ -\ J
l~;) 1-. 1 I.L<J
n J()
--
(;)
"I
C>)
, U81. ~19~
:ii~I~!!11~r~lj~mi;~;m:~:i~:~!liil!:i],!iii::~:jiii'~ii~f:',:,!10:
1 2/09
/12
66R- 4Ll9
"61~"4H
J.
w
::>
z.
._-'---,- '-..--.-..- ~
<
H1U 474
C IT Y
J OWNED
u
PROPERTY
~
\ ~~_5s, 16
bO
------
o PIERCE
\0
4
HI
87
'__0' ...______..._.... _...._._ __._.._~_._.__....
5
2059- 49J
STREET
;:m~::~~*~~' ~~~:~~~::=:::::::;~:',:;.:.:.:.;:::::~:~:~:; -_.
:::::~::~~{ :::fi:.$-:~~s::~";:)::~'t-=s:~.:-~.~:.::::-.::::-:.:.:-:.:.:.:-:. 200
'ilt~~ 'it~1'fl~~t,ll~tn\1~!;: if)
~~$~~,<~~, >>., :<"*~if~~~~~:::~. {,::~:P<~%xm~::::~~:::~:t: ~
.~".,:,
CITY OWlIEO
,,487-BOB
13/07
13/08
COV E CONDO.
102 - 92
OJ
~
OAK
210
~
r-:>
-.J
'....
\
U>
'"
V'
13/10
UC(B)
20
(.)
""
+
.
.
.
2
w
<.)
(/)
o
t
.
'j5
65
.
.
~l f!:
~ 5
".l(f)
, &1 'I i\ ~'1!.. r \~ I
~ lL C-~_. 9 J~ ~~ ~.~...I ;~'-
7}~' 4~i}'-'--' ~1i1i -.-..---. Ifi
+ 1 2 J",~ 5 6 0
+ 1 2 " ,II ~. 1]9 -
- r.... ""C-J' '....
. 0 0 .. ",11ll l'J', (O~ NC\j
.)~ ~:; t~ ~:; ~c.:: ~ c;,: ~ 0) a.J.
... ~ ..JJ
.
Q'
I
CLEVELAND
55 [ 7[Jlt;j l~~n[;~1, I/O
J:..____ ,....
DAVEY 8 8 23 I~ ~
@_._-~--
10
18
22 20
21
20
.--. -, e.23.
13
.~~.8- ~
18 110 ~
.(
:I:
107
14
-" - ---....._--
/19 15
17
-.- .......-
16
o
~
, 13 /01
u c (C)
22-1
226
228
305
30713/04
13/03
13/02
3/1
soo
PROPOSED .REZONING
OWHffl
A.PPLICANT
C A L. V A ~ V 8 A PT I <;:"T C H () R. c.. H
C \ TY 0 F C.LEARw A, ER
ZONING
. .
.~
FROM
? / S?
Uc (B,
TO .
-. -----_..._~
o
It)
I
70
~ --J
210
\.!)-- ~_.
f!: 21 6
a:
~ 7 ~
<.:> O:J J
_.~-_.- ;
4
~ ~~ ~~~
II) 11)11) 11)11)"'>
T S .'.
7 8
5
h ., 0
3 9~ J:>
(s.R. 60)
17- "I 4
-;'-;1 g
11)
o
10
1/9
4
iZ3 '\.
----L
'~5 2g::ms
0
10
201
203 W
205
<07
<09 2
:1/1
<IS 3
m-
UI 4
iij--
U? 5
PIERCE
H U
6
5
7
o
It>
fRANKUN
l~' ~
40 39s00 96
I- 41 .?'l
~~
REV \.l -\7-91..
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
zC(2-6
VA RT B
PART OF LOTS 1,2 & 3, BLOCK A,
AND ACREAG E NORTH OF THE EAST
320 FEET OF lOT 2 .'
:. . i' I; ,",
PlAHNING and ZONING BOARD
" CITY r;OMMISSION
RANGE \5" E -'TLAS PAoe
2..q
8E.CTIOH
oQ6
TOWNSHIP
s
. Sln~" Family
-----, .
..'
.'
,
'"
277 B 286 'B
I
!
r
.
ORDINANCE NO. 5305-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING
CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF CLEVELAND STREET,
NORTH OF COURT STREET, AND EAST OF SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE,
AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM PUBLIC/SEMI-
PUBLIC TO URBAN CENTER (CORE); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance
with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is
hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
Property
Zoninq District
Part of Lot 11, Lots 12 thru 20,
Block B, John R. Davey Subdivision.
(Z 92-6)
From: Public/Semi-Public
To: Urban Center (Core)
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Comm'i ss i oner
Approved as to form\~nd correctness:
- \Z,
v
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
~ 1M' ~l:.",
\ r
\
I
I
I
Ij&~ ....1'
481' ~'~
. ~ , ,\ 4 7 4
\
~\
~\
~05
/, S 16
b'J
,
\
.
17,09
u
----.
"
.r
PIERCE
----.---.---
C' 1 \' (JWtl[ ()
44/3 7 - ROB
13/08
c:c
~
OAK
,.
l"
.J
v-
I
v'
,,)
V'
\,
n<:\ \ t4) 1
t. ~'-
.,.......
- -1 ( -Dr;--;.;:;jIEO-- .-.. '"
J 2 (';;\5 ~ ?;o,
,,' .~)07"'~'07\.;d) "
.....
) ,I
, I
.118
.
.
.
.
:5
o
l1J
U
Vl
o
.
.
'35 305
65 307 13/04
. ---
.
'2 S :m 13/03
10
- ~(/)
u 2 (2' :; · 2
c ~ ~ +
_._~__. _~~:~ 65 ~
~ 41\67-1H\O COURT f:! . +... +f? .. "4o SlREET ...... g ....
-.-------...-f---.; so ..-.---.~:.~:f:,r,8' ---- --, :
TUR ER ~ ~I ST 3Z~ :
2 1 '- 1 2 .
--.(6)--- ~ --<:! --'-- 8 .
_y ~ .. T .
0;
CO')
J.
R.
2 PIS P
.
. ......-.-.------'.
:'0
en
,
CLEVELAND
o
a1
CITY, OWNED
J
......._._-----~ -...-- ..-..--_.-
r' R 0 r E H 1 Y
4
Hi 07
55 ~T~~;~:;t;-~~-b~~r
t. rl 6 \ ~ 5 114.J J I 2111 ~
;~, - __ :. __..,.:=L~ ..- .:...:.., }.:~:.._~ ~-: ~
DAVEY8/1f 2J 14 ~
..--..-.- I-----,B
'-, 9 ? 2 20
---( 8 }..... ..
'-_/ 1 0 '2 1
-. - -. ..-
:\::\::[:::;:::gB:!~::;:::;:\::::::::::\[:::::
,>::;:::::::~~~:!:,:::;;:i:':;::\~~\::[:: ~
Vl
t![!:::::,:l:~::::::\:::\jl:\:::,!:~~:l ~
-<
;i;~~I;i:~~~~i ,~'j.!II~~ :
w
::::J
Z ...,
~
-<
It!liI4~~
o
.,
~ --I
1/2
5
JOS9- 4;-1J
STREET
(.)
,"
13/01
210
o
P)
~no
u c (C)
22.
226
228
1.3/06
P/SP
ll)
o
',,-
"1
13/02
300
PROPOSED REZONING
COV E CONDO.
102 - 92
:!10
13/10
U C (B)
u
.q:
>
OWH~" PEAcE McMo!<-II\L PAE<BVT6',o,AP c.~vI2CH
,"PPLICAHT C\TY t>t= c.LE:.A~WlC\l E'\2-
FROM
TO
ZONING
p/ S P
UC (c)
PL A H Pi 1 N G and Z 0 H I H 0 BOAR 0
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
-:1;
(S.R. 60)
10
~~~ Ii - P~~*--IT&"-I~--'
.... "'- ' J I
?' 11 10 9
- -- '-3- - J__ .----
:', '~- .- -~ '--~-45 ' -' 6.':
.. .-- 'l 4 6 7 1
/7 I
___ ,_ 8,
C "''D<l:l ~ ~cl
.~___.?u; ~ ;;;ViV) ~~ ~ ~~
~;; PARK
. ,.o~'----~..--.._' 0.'~-
'o.~ ,')
\I')
"J
It)
9
119 " 6 8
/2.1 --- "'). 7
S 57Q7,25
-~ -.-.-
)5:9-:'IB'i~
o PIERCE
to
20/
203
205
1W
HUN
t-
@5
l&...
,~O?
209 2
~H
215 3
.I.
2Z/ 4
'22j-'
2Z7 5
0
to
.'10/
40
41
42
... -- ---
COT
37
36
35
9
__ JS!
6 7
5 -
8
...
FRANK UN
39S00
':1
96
(J
0
....
0
N
I W
0 ::>
IQ ~ 91:
....
."
U '" ~
D
:-
"81; 7 - 1 '" 7B
~
/ 15~~:.-
REV \\-\1-Cl'2.
z q 1- b
PA'R-r A
S OlCl H
f\IO p.. T N
cA-s-r
OF
of
of
C :.. 1.::- ..: CO 1-. A AI D S -r:
COUf<..T S7.
'5. G .s c ~ 0 l A A V E .
CITY r:OMMISSIOH
SE.CTION 0 g 6
TOWNSHIP '2'1 s
RANGE \ S- E
ATLAS PAGE 2.77 e, 2gb IS
.Slnol. Family
,
~"i~
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5235-92
1. In the title, insert "PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATIONj" before "PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE OATE."
2. On page 21, add a new Section 7 to read:
Section 7. This ordinance shall be codified in the Clearwater Code of
Ordinances as adopted on February 4, 1993. The City Commission acknowledges that
the provisions of the Land Development Code amended by this ordinance have been
recodified and renumbered since the first reading of this ordinance on February
4, 1993. The code publisher, Municipal Code Corporation, is authorized and
directed to incorporate the amendments and new provisions adopted herein into the
current text of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances uti 1 izing the following tracing
table:
I
. j
, ,
:1
Old or Added Sections
Current or New Sections
135.138
135.139
135.140
135.141
135.142
135.143
135.144
135.145
135.146
135.1461 [added]
136.022
136.025
137.005
40.481
40.482
40.483
40.484
40.485
40.486
40.487
40.488
40.489
40.490 [new]
42.34
41. 053
35.11
PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT: The City Code was recodified after this ordinance "went
to press ," and a 11 of the sect ions have been renumbered in the current Code. In
the meantime, this ordinance has been given first reading and has been reviewed
by state and loca 1 agencies. Renumbering these sections has no substantive
effect. This motion is the most efficient way to renumber these sections, and
the easiest to understand. A copy of this motion has been on file with the City
Clerk since July 8, 1993, for review by persons interested in examining the
ordinance prior to second reading.
M.A. Galbraith, Jr.
City Attorney
July 8, 1993
I
I
. " " . ,..' ". , ',:: " . ,: . ,". '.' ' . ' .' . '.' .' /"'. ',' : , .
.
f;
ORDINANCE NO. 5235-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTIONS 135.138 THROUGH 135.146,
CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO THE URBAN CENTER DISTRICT, TO ADD A
TRANSITION SUBDISTRICT AND TO REDEFINE THE PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL
USES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT REQU IREMENTS WITH I N THE URBAN CENTER
DISTRICT; CREATING SECTION 135.1461, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO
ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRANSITION SUBDISTRICT;
AMENDING SECTION 136.022, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO PARKING
STANDARDS; AMENDING SECTION 136.025, RELATING TO CONDITIONAL USE
STANDARDS; AND AMENDING SECTION 137.007, CODE OF ORDINANCES,
RELATING TO DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
'"
'.
1~
Section 1. Sections 135.138 through 135.146, as amended by Ordinances
5088-91 and 5190-92, are further amended and Section 135.1461 is created within
Division 22 of Chapter 135, Code of Ordinances, to read:
Division 22. Urban Center District (UC-)
Sec. 135.138. General description.
This district is created to provide for and guide the development and use
of land within the downtown area of the city in a manner that promotes the
implementation of the comprehensive plan, promulgates the downtown area as a
major retail, business, office, government and residential center of the city,
and insures the continued viability and growth of the ad valorem tax base for the
downtown. The spec ifi c deve 1 opment regu 1 at ions are intended to encourage planned
development and revitalization of the downtown area consistent with the IIDowntown
Development Plan" IIRcdeycloprncnt Plan for Downtown Clcan';atcrll and the city's
comprehensive land use plan.
Sec. 135.139. Expansion/contraction.
Appl ications to expand or contract the Urban Center District shall be
rev i ewed for cons i stency wi th the II Downtown Deve lopment Pl an II IIRedeve 1 opment Plan
for Downto't'm Clearwaterll and the city's comprehensive L:lnd use plan and judged
in accord with expressed goals and objectives contained therein.
''';
Sec. 135.140. Subdis~ricts
The Urban Center District shall be comprised of the following three (3)
subdistricts:
,-
(1) Bayfront UC(B): That portion of the Urban Center District lying west
of Osceola Avenue, and west of Fort HJrrison Avenue south of Court Strect.
c,
'"
ri
,
"
.
(2) Core UC(C): That portion of the Urban Center District lying east of
Osccola Avenue, cast of Fort Harrison Avenue south of Court Strcet, Jnd west of
Myrtle Avenue.
~
r.
iA
;1
. : '. . ,t" . " .... , '. .. ...... '. .',. '
(3) Eastern Corridor UC(E): That portion of thc Downtown Development
District lying east of Myrtlc Avenue.
111 Transition UC(T).
Sec. 135.141. Permitted uses.
(a) Within the Bayfront subdistrict, only the following uses (and
structures designed for such uses) shall be permitted:
(1) Indoor retail sales.
(2) Restaurants.
(3) Business/professional/government offices.
(4) Hotels/motels.
(5) Convention centers.
(6) Indoor commercial recreation/entertainment.
(7) Personal services.
(8) Accessory dwellings.
(9) Multiple-family dwellings.
(40) Medical clinics.
(10) ~ Commercia' parking.
( 11) (12) Vendors franch i sed to se 11 on pub 1 i c property (se'l ing from
j3ushcarts).
(12) Churches. svnaqoques. monasteries. and other places of worship.
(13) Accessory uses.
(14) Art galleries/studios.
(15) Townhouses.
(b) Within the Core subdistrict and Eastern Corridor subdistricts, only
the following uses (and structures designed for such uses) shall be permitted:
(1) Indoor retail sales.
(2) Restaurants.
(3) Business/professional offices.
(4) Hotels/motels.
(5) Convention centers.
(6) Indoor commercial recreation/entertainment.
(7) Personal services.
(8) Accessory dwellings.
(9) Multiple-family dwellings.
(10) Medical clinics/laboratories.
(11) Commercial parking.
(12) Government offices and facilities.
(13) Business services.
(11) Veterinary offices.
(15) Gasoline stations.
(14)~ Transportation stations.
(17) Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or storage.
(18) Outdoor commcrcial rccreation/cntertainmcnt.
(19) Vehiclc scrvice.
'. ;:
2
(20) Indoor storage and/or warehousingr
( 21 ) Iv h ole s a 1 i n g I d ~ s t r i bu tin g .
(22) Manufacturing.
(23) Research and development.
(15) (24) Interval ownership and timeshare dwellings.
(16) (25) Funeral homes.
(17) (26) Nursing homes.
(18) (27) Hospitals.
(19) (28) Congregate care.
(20) (29) Churches, synagogues, monasteries and other places of worship.
(21) ~ Social and community services.
(22) ~ Public and private elementary, middle and high schools.
(23) ~ Universities, colleges, academies and similar facilities for
learning.
(24) ~ Townhouses.
(31) Three family dwellings.
(35) Two family dwellings.
(36) Detached singlc family dwcllin~s.
(25) Commercial or trade schools.
(26) Child day care.
(27) Vendors franchised to sellon Qublic property.
(28) fJ7+ Accessory uses.
(29) tJ&t Art galleries/studios.
(c) Within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict, only the followinq uses (and
structures desiqned for such uses) shall be permitted:
ill
.w.
ill
l.tl
ill
iQl
.ill
J1U
111
(10)
(11 )
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
learninq.
Indoor retail sales.
Restaurants.
Business/professional offices.
Hotels/motels.
Convention centers.
Indoor commercial recreation/entertainment.
Personal services.
Accessorv dwellinQs.
Multiple-family dwellinQs.
Medical clinics/laboratories.
Commercial parkinQ.
Government offices and facilities.
Business services.
Veterinary offices.
Transportation stations.
Interval ownership and timeshare dwellinqs.
Funeral homes.
Nurs inQ homes.
Hospitals.
Congregate care.
Churches. svnaqoques, monasteries and other places of worship.
Social and community services.
Public and private elementary! middle and hiah schools.
Universities, colleges, academies and similar facilities for
3
,.,
'.'.
,;
"".
l1.2l Commercial or trade schools.
i1Ql Child day care.
l1Z.l Vendors franchised to sellon public property.
(28) Accessory uses.
if2l Art qalleries/studios.
Cd) Within the Transition subdistrict. only the followinq uses (and
structures desiqned for such uses) shall be permitted:
ill Indoor retail sales.
{gl Restaurants.
lJl Business/professional offices.
i!l Indoor commercial recreation/entertainment.
121 Personal services.
iQl Accessory dwellinqs.
ill Multiple-family dwellinQs.
1al Medical clinics/laboratories.
121 Commercial parkinq.
(10) Government offices and facilities.
illl Business services.
l1kl Transportation stations.
l1dl Funeral homes.
1lil Congreqate care.
~ Churches, synaqoques, monasteries and other places of worship.
ilQl Social and community services.
llZl Townhouses.
~ Three-familv dwellinQs.
i12l Two-family dwellings.
~ Detached sinqle-familv dwellinQs.
ifll Accessory uses.
~ Art qalleries/studios.
Sec. 135.142. Conditional uses.
(a) Within the Bayfront subdistrict, the following uses may be permitted
as conditional uses:
.'~ ,'. ..... \ . ..'
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(b) ^ny use which is not identified within preceding section 135.111 as
J permitted use in the Core and Eastern Corriaor subdistricts may be permitted
J~ a conditional u~e by the planning and zoning board, except that blood plasma
'centers shall be prohibited and not availab1e for sucR consideration. Thc
downtown dcvclopment board may, at its discretion, review, takc a position on and
be heard beforc thc planning Jnd zoning boafd conccrning Jny conditional usc
request. In ordcr for any conditional use to receive approval, the givcn use
Transportation stations.
Alcoholic beverage sales
Alcoholic beverage sales
Helistops.
(consumption on premises).
(package sales).
4
, .. :;~
~q
I
shall be determined to be consistent and compatible with the expressed
description of thi~ district, the "Redevelopment Plan for Downtovm Clearwater,"
and all stJndard~ for approval contained in chapter 136, section 136.025.
121 Bed and breakfast inns.
iQl Marina facilities.
..uu. Hithin the Core and Eastern Corridor subdistricts, the following uses
may be permitted as conditional uses:
ill Alcoholic beveraoe sales (consumption on premises).
111 Alcoholic beveraqe sales (packaqe sales).
ill Bed and breakfast inns.
iil Veterinary offices.
121 Gasoline stations.
iQl Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or storaqe.
ill Outdoor commercial recreation/entertainment.
ial Indoor storaqe and/or warehousinq.
~ Wholesalinq/distributinq.
(10) Manufacturinq.
(11) Vehicle service.
(12) Residential shelters.
ifl Within the Transition subdistrict, the followino uses may be
permitted as conditional uses:
ill
111
ill
iil
121
iQl
ill
ial
.w.
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
learninq.
(15)
Alcoholic beveraqe sales (on premises consumption)
Level I qroup care.
Level II qroup care.
Level III qroup care.
Conqreoate care.
Nursinq homes.
Child day care.
Commercial or trade schools.
Residential shelters.
Hotels/Motels.
Bed and breakfast inns.
Veterinary offices.
Public and private elementary, middle and hiqh schools.
Universities, colleges, academies and similar facilities for
Indoor storaoe and/or warehousinq.
Sec. 135.143. Use limitations.
{a) One vendor scll ing from a pushcart shall be permittcd pcr propcrty
dcvcloped with more than onc hundrcd thousand (100,000) square feet of gross
floor area dcvoted to commcrcial or office usagc (or combination thereof), The
pushcart sha 11 be eas i ly moved and mai nta ined by one person and sha 11 mea~urc not
more than eight (8) feet in lcngth and four (~) feet in width. All vending ~hJ.ll
occur on the qualifying property, not within any public right of way or any other
property.
5
(b) , Gasolinc stJt"ions shall have all pumps and dispensing islands located
at least fifteen (15) fect from all property lines.
J..tl-t-e+ All alcoholic beverage sales shall comply with the applicable
provisions of ~s contained in chaptcr 136, section 136.024 and chapter 72.
(d) Toymhouscs sha 11 bc govcrned by thc d imcns i ana 1 and numeri ca+
dcvelopment rcquircments containcd in chapter 136, scction 136.124,
(e) Thrcc family dwcllings shall be govcrned by thc dimcnsional and
numcrical dcvclopment requircments of the--Multiplc Fam.:i+y Rcsidential "Twel'/clI
District containcd in section 135.011 of this chapter.
(f) Two family dwcllings shall be governcd by the dimcnsionJl and
numeric.:lldcyclopment rcquircmcnts of the Multiplc FaRlily Rcsidcntial IIT'IJcl'lc"
District containcd in scction 135.0~3 of this chapter.
(g) DctJched s i n9 1 e f am-H-y-Gwc 11 i ngs s ha 11 be governed by thc d imcns i ona 1
-and numcric.)' dcvclopllleftt rcquircRlents of the Multiple Family Rcsidcntial "Eightll
District containcd in section 135.029 of this chapter.
lQl Vendors sellinq on public property shall be franchised by the city
and shall operate only in accordance with the terms of the franchise aqreement.
kl. {-fr} Family, group and congregate 'care facil ities shall comply with all
terms contained in chJptcr 136, section 136.020.
iQl {+}Accessory uses shall comply with all terms contained in chapter
136, section 136.008.
19l~ All uses, whether permitted, conditional or
nonconforming, shall be conducted in consonance with the use standards contained
in chapter 136, section 136.005.
Sec. 135.144. Development requirements for the Bayfront subdistrict.
(a) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and
numer i ca' requ i rements sha 11 app ly to deve 1 opment wi th i n the Bayfront subd i stri ct
of the Urban Center District:
(1) Maximum floor area ratio: Two (2.0).
(2) Maximum density: Forty-two (42) dwelling or hotel units per net acre.
(3) Maximum height: Sixty (60) feet.
(4) Minimum setbacks from street riqhts-of-way:
a. For buildinqs havinq a heiqht in excess, of thirty (30) feet: Fifteen
(15) feet.
b. For buildinqs havinq a heiqht of thirty (30) feet or less: Ten (10)
6
-0 ,.' 0., ,
. '
-" "~,' '. ',' '" ,', ,,:' ",' , . ".' , """,
, '" 'F '.,' , , . .
'. . . , '. .
. . ' ..' .. . . . . ~.,.,..
feet.
c. As an alternative to subsections a. and b. above. for buildinqs which
either do not provide surface parking or setback surface parkinq a minimum of
twenty (20) feet from any street riqht-of-way: None.
121 f4+ Minimum setbacks from side and rear property lines: None.
a.
requircd
b.
required
Buildings hJving a height in exccss of thirty (30) feet shall hJve a
setback of fiftcen (15) feet.
Buildings having a hcight of thirty (30) feet or less shall have a
sctbJck of ten (10) feet.
iQl +&t Off-street parking: Off-street parking and loading requirements
within the Bayfront subdistrict shall be the same as within the Core subdistrict.
These requirements are set forth in section 135.145, paragraphs (b) through (f).
(b) View corridor. Forty (40) percent of the width of the property
(measured parallel to Clearwater Harbor) shall be kept free of buildings for the
purpose of providing a view corridor to Clearwater Harbor and Clearwater Beach.
The view corridor may be a single continuous space or divided incrementally. The
area within the corridor(s) may be maintained as open space, be utilized for
amenities, or be surfaced for unenclosed parking. Waterfront propcrties shall
bc exempt from the view corridor described herein, but shall comply with sctback,
clear space and other requirements applicab~e to waterfront properties.
(c) Amenity area. Properties ^ll properties shall be provided with ground
level amenities which positively contribute to the ambience and aesthetics
afforded the Urban Center District, in accordance with the followinQ schedule.:Mle-
area devoted to such amenities to bc in accordance with the following:
Minimum Amenity Area
(Percentage of Lot Area)
Floor Area Ratio
0.5 - less thJn 1.0
1.0 - 2.0
5
10
All amenity areas shall be desiqned to be used by the puhlic and shall be located
adjacent to street riqhts-of-way or shall be directly accessible from street
rights-of-way provided with improvcments which are conducive to establishing a
high standard of urban aesthetics. Such improvements may include pedestrian
plazas, seating areas, fountains, sculptures, and landscaped areas and qardens
trccs, Jnd the like. All outdoor amenity ,areas shall be provided with
illumination devices. I
Sec. 135.145. Development requirements for the Core subdistrict.
(a) Until such time as the IIRedevclopment P1Jn for DmvntowA ClearwJtcr"
is rcevaluated by the city commission, there There shall be no floor area ratio,
density, height or other development requirements in the Core subdistrict, except
for parking as provided in this section which is set forth in following
paragraphs (b) through (f).
7
~:, ",',." ""~,>..""""""":"",,,,,'''.''':'..: ','..,' ",",' .,',' .. ,,",
,
.~
"
,
~~
<<
:;;
f:'
"
r.
~~
i
~
.~
j;~
~
"
.1;
II
fl
'i
(b) Off-street parking and loading requirements shall be as set forth in
undcr chaptcr 136, section 136.022 for any new, altered or expanded use except
as othcrwisc providcd for hcrcin. Spccifically, thesc off street parking and
loading rcquircmcnts apply to any ncw, altered or expandcd use cxcept as follows:
(1) Existing uses nonconforming with respect to parking shall be entitled
to be reestablished if damaged or destroyed, irrespective of the extent of same,
to the extent of the use existing prior to damage or destruction without
pro v i ding any add it i ona 1 park i ng, based on the requ i rements of the sect i on,
beyond that which existed previously.
(2) Existing uses nonconforming with respect to parking which are changed,
altered or expanded in use so as to increase park i ng requ i rements sha 11 be
required to provide only such additional spaces as determined by the positive
difference between that number of spaces required immediately prior to January
22, 1981, for the use and the number of spaces required herein, irrespective of
the fact that parking may still be deficient under the terms of this section.
(3) Parking requirements shall be waived for separate, individual uses
whose parking requirement is ten (10) or fewer spaces.
(c) Required off-street parking shall be provided according to the
following schedule:
'1
:~
>
{
*
~;
'.
~;
~
~
.t.
~
~
"~
~)
~'
(1) Retail sales, offices, services~~ manufacturing, and other similar
uses shall be provided with a minimum of one parking space per four hundred (400)
square feet of gross floor area.
(2) RestaurantT and enterta i nment J nd ins t i tut ion;)' uses s ha 11 be prov i ded
with a minimum of one parking space per each 200 square feet of Qross floor area
fivc (5) occupants based on dcsign capacity.
(3) Hotels~ ~ motels and bed and breakfast inns shall be provided with
a minimum of one parking space per unit or Quest bedroom, plus any required
parkinq for other associated uses.
(4) Residential uses shall be provided with a minimum of one parking space
per unit.
i
,
,
~
{
l
(d) It is hereby declared to be the intent of this section to provide for
sufficient flexibility in the parking requirement formula so as to allow for
consideration of individual situations and more innovative solutions to the
provision of off-street parking. Consistent with this intent, once the number
of spaces required to serve a given use is identified, the city, in conjunction
with the applicant, will review the existing or proposed public parking available
to serve the proposed use, such unusual or special conditions or provisions as
might be unique to the use, and the desire and ability of the city to participate
in any joint undertaking to provide parking space. In determining compliance
with the above off-street parking requirements, the following specific factors
may be taken into account and applied toward the number of required parking
spaces:
~;
}1
!
~~
~
:s
~,
-'
,,'
:4
~
~
,
"
8
,',
'.'
(1) The number of available off-street public parking spaces that
typically record less than a ninety (90) per cent utilization rate, as determined
by the traffic engineer, within six hundred (600) feet for long term (over three
(3) hours) and four hundred (400) feet for short term (three (3) hours or less)
parking.
(2) The number of spaces that can be provided within six hundred (600)
feet for employees and four hundred (400) feet for visitors based upon shared use
of existing parking spaces, public or private, due to variation in typical hours
of operation. In the event shared use of existing parking is proposed, a letter
of no object ion from the owner of the park ing area to be shared sha 11 be
provided.
(3) The number of available off-street parking spaces within six hundred
(600) feet for employee parking and four hundred (400) feet for visitor parking,
owned or leased by the applicant for off-site parking space, provided such site
is under the same ownership or there is provided evidence satisfactory to the
city of a binding commitment of satisfactory duration to the use of such parking
for the principal use in question during its normal hours of operation. Off-site
parking arrangements may include private and/or public parking spaces and shall
provide for the city to be notified sixty (60) days prior to the termination or
cancellation of any such arrangement.
(4) The number of parking spaces that should be added or subtracted based
upon unusual or special conditions unique to a particular use or based upon
specialized programs such as car-pooling or public transit opportunities and
requirements for employees or visitors.
(5) The amount of money offered as payment in lieu of providing required
off-street parking space, such payment to be based upon an estimated initial per
space or annual operating and maintenance cost set by resolution of the city
commission and subject to review at intervals of not more than two (2) years.
In establishing the process for payment in lieu of parking, the city commission
shall designate the responsible department or authority charged with receiving
moneys and establishing a fund to be utilized exclusively for the provision of
capital improvements to and operation and maintenance of parking facilities in
the Urban Center D is tr i ct~ and in accord '",i th the "Rcdc'lc 1 opmcnt P 1.10 for
Dovmtown C 1 c ar\'/.1tcr. 11
(2) Proposed provision for parking on and/or off-site.
(6) The direct the indirect contribution toward and feasibility of
acquisition, construction and/or operation of new or expanded parking facilities
in conjunction with the proposed use.
(e) All new, altered, or expanded uses requiring more than ten (10)
parking spaces shall submit a parking plan to the traffic engineer which shall
document the following:
(1) Location of property, type(s) of use, required number of parking
spaces for each use and composition of required parking (i.e., long and short-
term) .
9
(3) Available public parking and proposed use thereof, by location, if
proposed to be counted.
(4) Alternative financial contribution in lieu of parking, if any, and the
basis therefor.
(5) Other proposed arrangements des i gned to meet or in 1 i eu of park i ng
requirements.
~
'~
(f) All determinations made under the provisions of the section shall be
approved by the city manager, upon thc recommendation of thc traffic cnginccr Jnd
planning director. Appeals of any decision of the city manager relatinq to the
applicat':on of the provisions of this section may be made to Hhcrc dcemcd
appropriatc by the city manager, this detcrmination may bc refcrrcd to and madc
-b-y the city commission. Determination as to the required number of spaces -undcr
paragraph (c) and the number and basis of establishing any addition to or
subtract i on from th is number by the city manager or city commi ss ion undcr
pJragraph (d) shall be noted and made a part of the building permit record of the
city. The city commission or its designee may provide for lease payments to the
public parking system or payments in lieu of parking on such installment or
incremental basis as is deemed financially equitable and sound.
(q) Amen i t y areas. Propert ies sha 11 be prov i ded wi th qrou nd 1 eve 1
amenities which positively contribute to the ambience and aesthetics afforded the
Urban Center District, in accordance with the followinq schedule:
,
,
,j,
...
;~
Floor Area Ratio
Minimum Amenity Area
(Percentaqe of Lot Area)
0.5 - 1.0
Greater than 1.0
.2.
ill
All amenity areas shall be desiqned to be used by the public and shall be located
adiacent to street riqhts-of-way or shall be directly accessible from street
riqhts-of-wav. Such improvements may include pedestrian plazas, seatinq areas,
fountains, sculptures, and landscaped areas and qardens. All outdoor amenity
areas shall be provided with illumination devices.
Sec. 135.146.
subdistrict.
Development requirements for the Eastern Corridor
(a) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and
numerical requirements shall apply to development within the Eastern Corridor
subdistrict of the Urban Center District:
(1) Maximum density: Seventy (70) dwelling units or hotel/motel units per-
net acre.
(2) Maximum floor area ratio: Three (3.0).
(3) Maximum height: Two hundred (200) Onc hundred sixty (160) feet.
10
u
~.
."
(4) Off-street parking: Off-street parking and loading requirements
within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict shall be the same as within the Core
subdistrict. These requirements are set forth in preceding section 135.115,
paragraphs (b) through (f).
(b) Amenity area. Properties shall be provided with qround level
amenities which positively contribute to the ambience and aesthetics afforded the
Urban Center District, in accordance with the followinq schedule:
Floor Area Ratio
Minimum Amenity Are~
(Percentaqe of Lot Area)
0.5 - 1.0
Greater than 1.0
.5.
1Q
All amenity areas shall be desiqned to be used by the public and shall be located
adjacent to street riqhts-of-way or shall be directly accessible from street
riqhts-of-way. Such improvements may include pedestrian plazas, seatinq areas,
fountains, sculptures, and landscaped areas and qardens. All outdoor amenity
areas shall be provided with illumination devices. Reserved.
Sec. 135.1461. Development requirements for the Transition subdistrict.
(a) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The followinq dimensional and
numerical requirements shall apply to development within the Transition
subdistrict of the Urban Center District:
~
(1) Maximum density: Twenty-eiqht (28) dwellinq units or forty-two (4Z}
hotel/motel units per net acre.
(2) Maximum floor area ratio:
a. For residential or hotel/motel uses: None.
b. For other uses: Three-tenths (0.3).
(3) Maximum heiqht:
a. For residential or hotel/motel uses: Sixty (60) feet.
b. For other uses: Thirty-five (35) feet.
(4) Minimum lot area: Six thousand (6,000) square feet.
(5) Minimum lot width at setback line: Sixty (60) feet.
(6) Minimum lot depth: Eiqht-five (85) feet.
(7) Minimum setbacks: Principal and accessory structures shall be afforded
setbacks which measure not less than as follows, nor less than any qreater
requirement which may be applicable to a particular property in accordance with
the uniform development requlations contained in chapter 136:
a. From a street riqht-of-wav: Twentv (20) feet.
11
. ,~
.'
b. From a side property line: Five (5) feet.
c. From a rear property line: Ten (10) feet.
~
~(;
~
~
.,~,~,'
1(
~1
1;:
J
~,
Ii,
(8) Minimum open space:
a. For the lot: Thirtv (30) per cent of the lot area.
b. For the front yard: Fifty-five (55) per cent of the front yard area.
(9) Off-street parkinq: Off-street parkinq and loading requirements
within the Transition subdistrict shall be qoverned by the requirements of
section 136.022.
Section 2. Paragraph (4) of Subsection (f) of Section 136.022, Code of
Ordinances, is amended to read:
1
Sec. 136.022. Parking standards.
(f) Off-street parking spaces.
(4) Schedule. The following shall be the mlnlmum number of off-street
parking spaces required for each land use, activity, bu ilding or structure
permitted by this development code. v/hen the determination of the number of
required off-street parking spaces results in a requirement of a fractional
space, any fraction less than one-half (.5) space shall be rounded down to the
nearest whole number and any fraction of one-half (.5) space or more shall be
rounded up. Parking spaces required on the basis of building floor area shall
apply to gross floor area unless otherwise specified. Parking spaces required for
employees shall be based on the maximum number of employees on duty or residing,
or both, on the premises at anyone time, which would include any overlap of
employees at a change of shift.
a. Residential and lodging uses.
1. Detached single-family dwellings, townhouse units and two-family dwell-
ings: Two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit.
2. Three-family dwellings, multiple-family dwel lings, accessory attached
dwellings and mobile homes: One and one-half (1.5) parking spaces per dwelling
unit.
3. Motels and hotels: One parking space per motel or hotel unit. Any
ancillary retail, restaurant, tavern or personal service uses (including banquet
and meeting room space) located within a hotel/motel building and which occupy
not more than five (5) per cent of the gross floor area of the hotel/motel
building shall be permitted a fifty (50) per cent reduction in parking for such
ancillary uses.
4. Nursing homes: One parking space per two (2) beds occupied at maximum
capacity.
5. Group care facilities: Two (2) parking spaces for the first six (6)
persons, plus one space for each additional six (6) or fraction thereof, plus one
12
space per two (2) nonresident employees or supervisors.
6. Congregate care facilities: One parking space per two (2) dwelling
units, plus one space per two (2) employees.
7. Residential shelters: One (1) parking space per six (6) residents,
based on maximum occupancy approved by the city. A minimum of one (1) space
shall be required for each shelter.
8. Bed and breakfast inns: One parkinq space per each bedroom devoted to
the bed and breakfast use.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 3. Subsection (c) of Section 136.025, Code of Ordinances, as
amended by Ordinances 5034-90 and 5107-91, is further amended to read:
Sec. 136.025. Conditional use standards.
(c) Supplementary standards, by category of use. The following standards
(which apply to the identified category of use) shall supplement the general
standards of use identified above and no conditional use shall be authorized
unless determined to meet all of the standards applicable thereto.
*
*
*
*
*
(3.1) Bed and breakfast inn uses may be permitted in the Urban Center
District, subject to the followinq:
a. The hours of operation are compatible with surroundinq uses;
b. The volume of traffic oenerated by the use is compatible with
surroundinq uses;
c. Such uses shall be permitted only in principal structures containino
not less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet of oross floor area:
d. Not more than fifty (50) percent of the Qross square footage of the
principal structure shall be utilized for the bed and breakfast use. For the
purpose of calculatino the area of the structure devoted to the bed and breakfast
use, only the floor area of the bedroom and bathroom areas utilized by the bed
and breakfast Quests shall be considered in such calculations.
e. The use complies with all of the Qeneral standards, contained in
subsection (b) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Child day care may be permitted within the Limited Office, General
Office, Neighborhood Commercial, Commercial Center, Urban Center (Transition) and
Public/Semipublic Districts, subject to the followinQ upon a dctcrmination that:
13
1
.i.
I
a. Sufficient on-site outdoor play areas shall be provided and so designed
as to ensure user safety.
b. Appropriate on-site loading and unloading areas shall be provided which
are sufficiently distant from other trafficways so as to ensure user safety.
c. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of tllis section preceding paragraph (b).
(9) Commercial parking lots may be permitted within the Beach Commercial,
Re sort Comrnerc i a 1 "Twen ty~four II and II Twenty-e i ght ," and Pub 1 i c/Semi pub 1 i c
Districts, subject to the followinq upon dctcrmination that:
a. The spaces available for rent shall not be spaces required by this
deve lopment code to serve another use operat ing at the same time as the
commercial parking lot.
b. The spaces available for rent shall not be overflow spaces for another
use situated on the same property unless determined by the board that the
commerc i a 1 and noncommerc i a 1 park i ng lots are comp 1 ementary and des i gn to
function consistent with their use and purpose.
c. The spaces shall be designed, surfaced and landscaped in accord with
the minimum requirements of this development code.
d. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section prcceding paragraph (b).
(9.1) Commercial or trade schools may be permitted within the Urban Center
( Trans it i on) I L i mi ted Off ice and Genera 1 Off ice d i stri cts I subject to the
fo'lowinq upon J detcrmination thJt:
a. All instructional areas shall be located within an enclosed building
and all teaching shall be conducted indoors.
b. The use shall comply with all of the general standards for conditional
!;
"
uses.
t
~
1
~
(10) Congregate care facilities may be permitted within the Multiple-
Family Residential IITwelve,1I "Sixteen," "Twenty-fourll and "Twenty-eight"
Districts, the Residential, Office and Commercial Planned Development Districts,
and the Urban Center (Transition), Limited Office and Neighborhood Commercial
Districts~ subject to the followinq upon determination that:
a. The permi tted dens ity sha'l not exceed the max imum permitted net
density of the zoning district in which the facility is to be located, such
density to be determined on the basis that every two (2) beds within the facility
shall be considered to equal one (1) dwelling unit. For those facilities located
within a Planned Development District, density shall be regulated through the
site plan process in accordance with section 135.076, but the density shall not
exceed the maximum allowable density set forth in section 136.082.
14
b. The size and state of repair of the facility shall be appropriate for
the proposed use.
c. Ancillary service and recreation areas appropriate for the use shall
be provided on the site in a manner which is compatible with surrounding
properties.
d. The use shall be located within an area which is not concentrated with
other care facilities.
.
e. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section ~rcccding paragraph (b).
(10.1) Gasoline station uses may be permitted in the Urban Center (Core)
and Urban Center (Eastern Corridor) Districts, sub,;ect to the followinq:
a. The hours of operation and overall site desiqn are compatible with
surroundinq uses.
b. The use complies with all of the qeneral standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(12.2) Hotel/motels may be permitted in the Urban Center (Transition)
District, subject to the followinq:
a. The hours of operation are compatible with surroundinq uses:
b. The use complies with all of the qeneral standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(13.1) Indoor storaqe and/or warehousinq uses may be permitted in the
Urban Center (Core), Urban Center (Eastern Corridor) , and Urban Center
(Transition) Districts, subiect to the followino:
a. The hours of operation are compatible with surroundino uses;
b. The volume of traffic qenerated bv the use is compatible with
surrounding uses;
c. Any noise qenerated by the use is compatible with surroundinQ uses;
d. The use comp 1 ies wi th a 11 of the oenera 1 standards contai ned in
subsection (b) of this section.
(14) Level I group care facilities may be permitted within the Multiple-
Family Residential "Eight," "Twelve," "Sixteen," "Twenty," IlTwenty-four" and
IlTwenty-eight" Districts, the Residential, Office, and Commercial Planned
Development Districts, and the Urban Center (Transition), Limited Office and
Neighborhood Commercial Districts, subject to the followinq upon determination
15
that:
a. The use shall comply with all terms contained in section 136.020,
IIFamily, group and congregate care facilitic~,1I of this chapter.
b. Accessory uses shall be limited to those normal and incidental to
residential dwelling units.
c. The use shall be reasonably compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood as measured by building size, location and state of repair.
d. The site shall be able to accommodate required parking, ancillary
service and outdoor activity areas appropriate to the use and in a manner which
is compatible with surrounding properties.
e. Proper supervision shall be provided to ensure neighborhood
campa t i b il i ty .
f. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section preceding paragraph (b).
(15) Level II group care facilities may be permitted within the Multiple-
Family Residential "Eight," ITwelve,1I "Sixteen," IITwenty," "Twenty-four" and
"Twenty-eight" Districts, the Residential, Office and Commercial Planned
Development Districts, and the Urban Center (Transition), Limited Office and
Neighborhood Commercial Districts, subject to the following upon determination
that:
a. The use shall comply with all regulations contained in section 136.020,
"Family, group and congregate care facilities,1I of this chapter.
b. Accessory uses shall be limited to those normal and incidental to
residential dwelling units.
c. The use shall be reasonably compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood as measured by building size, location and state of repair.
d. The site shall be able to accommodate required parking, ancillary
service and outdoor activity areas appropriate to the use and in a manner which
is compatible with surrounding properties.
e. Proper supervision shall be provided to ensure neighborhood
compatibility.
f. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section preceding paragraph (b).
(16) Level III group care facilities may be permitted within the Urban
Center (Transition), Limited Office and Neighborhood Commercial Districts..!..
subject to the following upon determination that:
16
1
(,
1
a. The use shall comply with all regulations contained in section 136.020,
"Family, group and congregate care facilities, II of this chapter.
~
~
..
b. Accessory uses shall be limited to those normal and incidental to
residential dwelling units.
c. The use shall be reasonably compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood as measured by building size, location and state of repair.
d. The site shall be able to accommodate required parking, ancillary
service and outdoor activity areas appropriate to the use and in a manner which
is compatible with surrounding properties.
e. Proper supervision shall be provided to ensure neighborhood
compatibility.
f. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section preceding paragrJph (b).
*
*
*
*
*
(16.2) Manufacturinq uses may be permitted in the Urban Center (Core) and
Urban Center (Eastern Corridor) Districts, sub.iect to the following:
a. The hours of operation are compatible with surroundinq use~1.
b. The volume of traffic generated by the use is compatible with
surroundinq uses;
c. Any noise qenerated by the use is compatible with surroundinq uses:
d. The use compl ies with all of the oeneral standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section.
(17) Except as provided herein, marina facilities may be permitted in the
Beach Commercial, Resort Commercial "Twenty-Four" and "Twenty-Eight," General
Commercial, Research, Development and Office Park, Urban Center (Bayfront), and
Public/Semi-Public Districts, subject to the following:
*
*
*
*
*
"
~
(20) Nursing homes may be permitted within the Urban Center (Transition) I
Limited Office, General Office, and the Public/Semipublic Districts , subject to
the followino upon determination thJt:
a. The use shall be appropriately located in an area not concentrated with
similar facilities.
I
'f,
Q
Ii
b. The use shall be separated from high activity or noise generating
areas. -
17
c. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section prcccding paragrJph (b).
(21) Outdoor commercial recreation/entertainment may be permitted within
the Beach Commercial, Resort Commercial "Twenty-four" and IITwenty-eight,1I Urban
Center ( Core) I Urban Center ( Eas tern Carr i dor), Genera 1 Commerc i a 1, Highway
Commercia 1 and Commercial Center Districts I sub,;ect to the followinQ upon
detcrmination that:
~
~~
.~
:'1,
lft
X
~
'l
~
a. All facilities and activities shall be self-contained on the premises,
unless otherwise approved by the planning and zoning board.
b. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section prcccding para~rJph (b).
(22) Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or storage may be permitted within
the Urban Center (Core), Urban Center (Eastern Corridor), General Commercial,
Highway Commercial, Commercial Center and Limited Industrial Districts, subject
to the followinq upon dctermination t~:
a. The outdoor use shall not adversely affect the community appearance
objectives of the city. In particular, no temporary buildings, portable
buildings, tents, stands, trailers, vending carts or like buildings or structures
shall be utilized in conjunction with the use.
b. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section prcccding parJgrJph (b).
}
;
~
,l
:~
t~
'i
~
~,
"
"
,
'l)
~
~
\:
J
.~
'.
,
~:
*
*
*
*
*
"
<
(22.2) Public and private elementary, middle and hiqh schools may be
permitted within the Urban Center (Transition) district, subject to the
followinq:
"
~
a. The total amount of land area devoted to the use shall be a minimum of
one (1) acre and a maximum of three (3) acres;
b. The scale of any structures and facilities associated with the use
shall be compatible with surroundinq properties;
c. Any outdoor recreational facilities associated with the use shall be
desiqned and located so as to be compatible with surroundinq properties; and
d. The use shall comply with all of the qeneral standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section.
~
*
*
*
*
*
t~
'I
'f
$
if
l,
'1
r
;;
:~
.'
(24.1) Residential shelters may be permitted within the Multi-Family
Residential Districts, and the Limited Office, Neighborhood Commercial, General
Commerc ia 1, Hi ghway Commerc i a 1, Urban Center ( Core) , Urban Center (Eastern
Corridor), Urban Center (Transition), Limited Industrial, Research, Development
18
.
<
~
.
I
I
~
t
4
J
1~
~
"/
\
~.
1
~
>!
t
,~
ij
~)
'~
f;;
'"
-1
1
'~
~
and Office Park and Public/Semipublic Districts sub.;ect to compliance ~
dctcFmination thJt thc use complies with all' of the general standards contained
in subsection (b) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
I
:~
\
?X
if
,#J
~'
J
~
'"
~
i
.1;
(26.1) Universities, colleqes, academies and similar facilities for
learninq may be permitted within the Urban Center (Transition) district. subject
to the followinq:
a. The total amount of land area devoted to the use shall be a minimum of
one (1) acre and a maximum of three (3) acres;
}.
h
l
i
1
b. The scale of any structures and facilities associated with the use
shall be compatible with surroundinq properties;
c. Any outdoor recreational facilities associated with the use shall be
desiqned and located so as to be compatible with surroundinq properties; and
d. The use shall comply with all of the qeneral standards contained in
~ubsection (b) of this section.
(27) Vehicle service may be permitted within the Beach Commercial, General
Commercial, Highway Commercial, Commercial Center, Urban Center (Core). Urban
Center ( Eastern Carr i dor) and L im i ted I ndu str i a 1 D i str i cts , subject to the
followinq upon determination that:
a. All service bays shall be located within an enclosed building and all
servicing shall be conducted indoors.
b. Entrances to any service bays shall be appropriately oriented with
respect to adjoining uses.
c. A 11 used tires, parts, and similar objects sha 11 be stored in a
building or other enclosed structure.
d. Careful distinction shall be drawn by the board with regard to the type
of service to be performed. Major repairs, including engine or transmission
dismantling, painting, body, fender, muffler, top and upholstery work shall not
be allowed unless specifically permitted by the board.
e. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section prcccding p~rJgraph (b).
(28) Veterinary offices may be permitted with the Limited Office, General
Office, General Commercial, Highway Commercial, Commercial Center, Neighborhood
Commercial, Urban Center, and Beach Commercial Districts. subject to the
fo'lowinq upon determination that:
a. All activities shall be conducted within soundproof, air conditioned
buildings with no outdoor cages, runs or other outdoor- facilities unless
determined by the planning and zoning board that such facilities are located and
19
screened in a manner so as to not adversely affect the use, enjoyment or value
of surrounding properties.
b. There shall be no overnight boarding of animals unless determined by
the board that such boarding facilities are sufficiently soundproofed, air
conditioned and are made available only to animals requiring veterinary
treatment.
c. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section preceding pJragraph (b).
*
*
*
*
*
(30) Wholesaling/distributing facilities may be permitted within the
General Commercial and Highway Commercial Districts. Urban Center (Core). and
Urban Center (Eastern Corridor)., subject to the followinq upon determination
that:
a. The size, mass and scale of any structure used for such activity is
compatible with surrounding structures.
b. The uses shall comply with all of the general standards contained in
subsection (b) of this section preceding paragraph (b).
Section 4. Section 137.005, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 137.005. Definitions.
(a) Words and terms used in this development code shall be given the
meanings identified hereinafter:
*
*
*
*
*
Bed and breakfast inn: A home occupation consistinq of a form of Quest
lodqinq in which bedrooms are rented and breakfast is served. Bed and breakfast
accommodations shall be permitted only in buildinqs principally used as private
residences. The term is intended to describe the offerinQ of temporary lodqina
in a private home havina architectural and historic interest. rather than the
provision of food service or the offerinq of facilities for long term occupancy,
such as provided by hotel/motel uses.
*
*
*
*
*
~
Section 5. The provisions of, this ordinance have been found to be
consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
20
i
I
I
,I
I
I
I
j
i
!
1
~
h ,,-,I
"
, ,(
t ,': '
"
,'" '\ ':.,
"
. '.'.'.'
Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
February 4, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Approved as to form and correctness:
~
M. A. Galbraith,
City Attorney
. \',' c.": " '
":~:~:~~~i~t~~~ '
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
"
'.'
.,~
[t has been over six years since the plan for Downtown Clearwater has been significantly reviewed and
updated. Due to changing market conditions, demograph ic dynamics, and other factors, there is an
obvious need to revisit the Downtown Development Plan. In addition to these conditions, two important
actions will create the impetus for real and positive change in Downtown Clearwater: (1) the City of
Clearwater has acquired the former Maas Brothers property at the corner of Cleveland Street and Osceola
Avenue for possible redevelopment; and (2) the City has acquired land adiacent to its existing City Hall
Annex a-f}owntown mixed lIse development (referred to os the Enst End Project) is proposed to be
developed on 0 large parcel gencffill-y located at the intersection of Cleveland Street and Missouri Avenue
for eventual redevelopment.
:~
.,
,
'f.
l~;
~:.
.:r
INTRODUCTION
"
,',
I;.
Strictly speaking, this Downtown Development Plan is the means by which the City of Clearwater enacts
the provisions of state statutory requirements pertaining to community redevelopment. The Community
Redevelopment Act of 1969, as amended, establishes the primary funding mechanism for req~velopment
of areas by permitting increased taxes generated in a redevelopment area to be "captured" and spent
specifically for redevelopment purposes. To institute a Tax Increment Financing ([IF) district, the local
government must first consider findings of fact and declare a "finding of necessity" in accordance with
specific legal criteria. The City of Clearwater did this for its 1981 downtown development district by
means of Resolution No. 81-67. The governing body must also create a community redevelopment
agency to carry out the powers authorized in the law; this agency may be a separate body or the local
governing body may declare itself to be the CRA. The Community Redevelopment Act specifies that a
redevelopment trust fund must be created for the Community Redevelopment Agency for the duration of
the community redevelopment project. The Clearwater City Commission appointed itself the Community
Redevelopment Agency responsibil ities through Resolution No. 81-68, August 6, 1981.
:&
'.
;,
.'
"
Ii
!;
rt
;~:
.~:.
The Community Redevelopment Act specifies that a redevelopment trust fund must be created for the
Community Redevelopment Agency for the duration of the community redevelopment project. This trust
fund shall be used to finance or refinance each community redevelopment project that the agency
undertakes. The trust fund shall be funded annually in an amount equal to the incremental tax revenue
generated in the redevelopment area. Calculation of this incremental value uses the year in which the
ordinance is passed adopting the redevelopment plan as the base year for purposes of freezing the tax roll.
Increases in taxable property value above the base year value are known as the increment. The city and
county governments continue to receive tax revenues which result from application of the current millage
rate to the base year taxable value. Revenues resulting from the appJication of the current tax rate to the
increment go to the redevelopment agency. The Community Redevelopment Aet specifically exempts
school districts and water management districts; those jurisdictions continue to receive tax revenues as
though no redevelopment trust fund has been created. The operational basis and debt service structure
of the redevelopment trust fund was required to be approved by the Board of County Commissioners
prior to its creation by the City Commission. The Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency trust
ordinance was established by Ordinance 2779 on August 19, 1982. and covers the area more specifically
described in Appendix G. Appendix DE illustrates the funds collected and their uses since 1982.
'~
<,'
I!'
l!
~
:~~
;.!
"
<.
"
"
:~
,
"1
,
;
\
The Act further specifies that the community redevelopment plan must conform to the comprehensive plan
for the municipality, as approved by the local planning agency under the provisions of the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act (LGCPLDRA). In
Clearwater, the local planning agency is the Planning and Zoning Board. The plan must include a
feasible method for the relocation of any families who will be displaced, adequate provisions for park
';\
"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
.-,
",
'....., .
, ,-'.,1
'f'
FIGURE 1 - CLEARWATER'S DOWNTOWN
NO CHANGE TO THIS PAGE
crry OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMBNT PLAN
2
OcrOBER, 1993
~: 1:
"
',.,.'
) ,~. -,'
. '
FIGURE 2 - MAJOR DOWNTOWN FEATURES
NO CHANGE TO THIS PAGE
crrv OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
3
areas and recreation facilities desirable for neighborhood improvement in the district (with special
consideration for the health, safety and welfare of children in the general vicinity of the area covered by
the plan) and must afford maximum opportunity consistent with the needs of the city as a whole, for the
rehabilitation and redevelopment of the district by private enterprise. Condemnation and relocation
policies are found in Appendices* A and F. respectively.
i,
The Act also contains strict conflict of interest provisions, such that no public official or employee, no
member of a Community Redevelopment Agency, no City Commissioner, and no employee of a
Community Redevelopment Agency, shall acquire directly or indirectly, any personal interest in any
community redevelopment project, in any property included in the redevelopment district, or in any
contract let in connection with the community redevelopment project. In the event of involuntary
acquisition, the interest must be immediately disclosed in writing to the City Commission and any such
official, commissioner or employee shall not participate in any action by the City or the Redevelopment
Agency affecting such property.
Summaries of previous "downtown development plans" arc provided in ^ppcndix~
PURPOSE AND CHARTER
In order to focus resources to successfully implement this Downtown Plan, it is extremely important to
establish a clear, definite Purpose. The Purpose must be a statement that summarizes the City's intentions
for the Downtown through the adoption of this Plan. To assist in the implementation of the Purpose, it
is equally important to focus community concepts and goals for Downtown through the adoption of a
specific Charter. The Charter must contain conceptual statements and goals for Downtown that are
simple, real istic, feasible, and interdependent.
For Downtown Clearwater, the following Purpose is established:
PURPOSE
BRING MORE PEOPLE DOWNTOWN FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME WITH
THE GOAL OF INCREASING THE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY OF DOWNTOWN
CLEARWATER AS MEASURED BY INCREASES IN AD VALOREM REAL PROPERTY
TAX VALUATIONS, INCREASES IN RETAIL/ENTERTAI~tENT FLOOR AREAS ON
MAJOR DOWNTOWN THOROUGHFARES, INCREASES IN OFFICE AND
STOREFRONT OCCUPANCY RATES, CONSOLIDATION OF CITY GOVERNMENT
OFFICES IN THE CORE OR BA YFRONT SUBDISTRICTS, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW
MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, AND INCORPORATION OF THE PINELLAS TRAIL
INTO DOWNTOWN PARKS.
The Charter relates to the purpose for Downtown Clearwater by serving as a means to achieve that
purpose. The Charter should be regarded as an expression of community commitments and desires for
the Downtown, as well serving as the basis for any functional analysis of and planning for the Downtown
area.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4
OCTOBER, 1993
t
CHARTER
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER IS ORIENTED TOWARDS THE WATERFRONT
Downtown Clearwater will utilize its striking location on the bluff
above Clearwater Harbor as a focal point for Downtown activities
and this wonderful natural resource will be promoted and preserved.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER IS ACCESSmLE
Downtown Clearwater will be accessible to its citizens and visitors
through a functional mixture of roadway networks, mass transit, ,
pedestrian and bicycle amenities.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER HAS ACTIVE AMENITIES
Downtown Clearwater will have an orientation toward active
amenities, including an increased emphasis on recreation and
entertainment features.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER IS AN ECONO:MIC CENTER
Downtown Clearwater will serve as an economic center and will
contain a broad-based economic emphasis, including office,
government, cultural and retail functions.
Downtown Clearwater will provide unique shopping, recreational and
working environments for its citizens and visitors.
f
!
I
j
,
i
!
,I
I
i
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER OFFERS UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
5
OCTOBER, 1993
\
A
~
I
i
~
f
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER IS A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE
The residential component of Downtown Clearwater will receive a
primary emphasis in any plans or programs for the Downtown;
residential developments will be supported by public amenities such
as parks.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER IS A GOOD NEIGHBOR TO SURROUNDING
NEIGHBORHOODS
:1
.~
~
,
~
~
~
Downtown Clearwater will serve as a good neighbor to the
residential, office and commercial neighborhoods which surround it.
.'t
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER'S FUTURE IS LINKED TO THE FUTURE OF
CLEARWATER BEACH
Downtown Clearwater and Clearwater Beach will be linked; each of
these separate but interdependent areas must be supported by the
overall goals of this plan.
iF.
It
LINKAGES
'~
The success of any downtown development plan is based upon the linkage between the major components
of the plan. That is, it is extremely important that each of the individual components of the plan
complement each other in achieving the objectives established in the Charter for the downtown area. This
plan will describe the specific physical components which make up Downtown Clearwater and provide
for linkages between each of the physical components. Each of the linkages will promote the primary
purpose of this Downtown plan, which is to bring more people Downtown during extended periods of
the day. These linkages can be very direct such as improving transportation systems to route people
Downtown, or they can be indirect, such as changes to zoning regulations on Clearwater Beach which
will promote the establishment of Downtown businesses. In any case, all of the linkages proposed in this
document can be regarded simply as inducements for people to visit or live in Downtown Clearwater.
MEASURES OF SUCCESS
The overall purpose of this Downtown Development Plan is to bring more people Downtown for extended
periods of time in order to achieve stated goals. How is the success of this plan in achieving this goal
to be measured? This information will be of importance in preparing updates and making adjustments
to this plan. Because the plan takes a market driven approach to Downtown development, it is difficult
to precisely quantify specific measures of success. Since the plan assumes the private sector will serve
as the primary actor in the Downtown development, its success can be measured only by the success of
external factors; consequently ~ tlle plan may II succeed II if private development increases or II fail " if
private development does not materialize, Such private development may be more dependent on the state
of the economy and other factors than on the incentives and guidelines offered in this plan.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
6
OCTOBER. 1993
I
i
Still, some measures of success are necessary in order to gauge the overall effectiveness of the plan and
to provide for adjustments/updates to the plan in the future.
1
MEASURES OF SUCCESS
1993 - 1998
RET AIL/ENTERTAINMENT
*
Promote Cleveland Street as the retail/entertainment corridor of Downtown Clearwater by
increasing retail and entertainment floor area by 50,000 20 percent abovo the 1992 "base"
of square feet
*
Add new retail/entertainment floor area by 150,000 square feet
*
Increase retail/entertainment utilization of existing ground floor area along major corridors
by 100.000 7.5 percent above the 1992 "base" of square feet
RESIDENTIAL
*
Add 150 new multifamily dwelling units
OFFICE/COMMERCE
*
Consolidate City Hall offices in the Downtown
*
Increase/maintain occupancy rate for offices in the Core subdistrict at a level that is 5
percent above the Tampa Bay region's office occupancy rate
*
Retain existing government office floor area at 1993 ~ levels
RECREA TION AL
*
Successfully incorporate the Pinellas Trail into Downtown events and activities by linking
it to the Downtown parks
GENERAL
*
Maintain ratio of exempt properties to nonexempt properties at 1993 ~ levels
*
Increase property tax valuations for Downtown properties by five percent above the
Citywide rate of increase
PHYSICAL COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN
This section of this Downtown Plan contains the functional analysis of Downtown Clearwater, along with
the recommendations for implementing the Plan which are based on this functional analysis. The section
consists of the following subsections:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
7
OCTOBER, 1993
. . ',.. ..: "" ':. j, .
1
~
a
.1
},
~
f.t
)\
U
l>.
t
\
~
i
~,
'!
'.
~.
~
~
~
."
'"
,
!~
m
b~
A. EXISTING LAND USES. This subsection describes the existing land
uses of the Downtown, and identifies existing land use patterns within
the Downtown.
B. ACCESS. This subsection describes and evaluates the various ways in
which Downtown Clearwater is accessed by automobile, mass transit,
and pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
C. DISTRICTS. This subsection describes and analyzes the -sHt functional
districts in Downtown Clearwater in terms of the Charter established for
this Plan.
D. SIGNAGE. This sub~ection briefly discusses the signage issue and its
implications for the Downtown.
EXISTING LAND USES
~
Existing land use within the Downtown Clearwater provides a starting point for a functional analysis of
the future development of the Downtown. The existing uses may indicate desirable land use patterns that
should be encouraged or undesirable development patterns that should be discouraged.
i
"
In Downtown Clearwater's case, both desirable and undesirable development patterns have emerged from
a study of the existing land uses. As Figure 3 indicates, land uses in the Downtown are quite varied,
ranging from industrial uses to park sites. This variety, in itself, illustrates a lack of focus for community
purposes in the Downtown. In effect, the Downtown has become a IIcatch-allll area for an extremely
wide variety of land uses, If redevelopment of Downtown Clearwater is to be successful, a more narrow
scope of what land uses are considered desirable needs to be developed and promoted in this plan and
in the zoning regulations through which much of this plan will be implemented.
Figure 3 illustrates the generalized land use patterns that have been allowed to develop in Downtown
Clearwater. Along the western edge of Downtown is the bayfront governmental/cultural/recreation area,
containing two large churches, several government office buildings7 the Clearwater Main Library, two
major Church of Scientology facilities, and Coachman Park. As this plan will demonstrate, this land use
pattern is highly desirable, particularly if linkages between this area and other areas of Downtown (and
Clearwater in general) can be promoted.
~
~
A second area containing a distinct pattern of land uses is the office core area, centered at the intersection
of Cleveland Street and Garden Avenue. As with the bayfront area, this land use pattern is highly
desirable, needing only improved linkages with other functional areas of Downtown to cement its
potential as one of Downtown's major development features.
The third distinct area of land uses is the retail activity center of Downtown Clearwater, generally located
along both sides of Cleveland Street between East and Lincoln A venues. Retail uses in Downtown
Clearwater are extremely desirable, as they serve to attract visitors to the Downtown from other areas
of Clearwater, thus making mutually-beneficial linkages between these retail areas and other sectors of
Downtown possible.
The fourth and final area of distinct land use patterns is centered on Pierce Street east of Myrtle Avenue.
Here, a mixture of heavy commercial, vehicle service and repair, and quasi-industrial uses have been
developed, These uses are generally unattractive in appearance, and involve noisy and potentially noxious
activities. Because of their close proximity to the retail activity center of Downtown, these uses are not
desirable along the major entryways or in the Core subdistrict.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
8
OcrOBER, 1993
" '.~
,"
FIGURE 3 - EXISTING LAND USE MAP
".,':
NO CHANGE TO THIS PAGE
errY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
9
OCTOB~,,1993.
ACCESS
,
"
f
~.
~
~
An extremely important aspect of the way Downtown Clearwater functions and is perceived involves
transportation within and into the Downtown. If the traffic flow into Downtown is efficient and the
entryways are attractive, Downtown Clearwater is more likely to be frequented by citizens and visitors.
If traffic flow is congested and the roadsides are unappealing, the Downtown is less likely to be a place
where people visit, live and shop and where entrepreneurs invest money.
The following sections deal with the specific major roadways in Downtown Clearwater and their function
within the Downtown area. These roadways are evaluated in terms of their function as entryways into
the Downtown and as well as their function as corridors within the Downtown. Specific requirements
and needs associated with these roadways will be noted. Also included will be a discussion of Pinellas
Trail, the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A) terminal, pedestrian travel information and other
future access needs for Clearwater's Downtown. Figure 1.s illustrates these transportation components.
CLEVELAND STREET
,
"
"
Cleveland Street is the single most important roadway in Downtown Clearwater. Due
to its" Business S. R. 60" designation, it carries a substantial amount of the traffic heading
to Clearwater Beach, as well as the bulk of the office and retail traffic headed for
Downtown. It is currently operating at a level of service (LOS) liB".
In the Downtown Core area, Cleveland Street has been attractively landscaped, with
paving block and planters. This treatment has greatly improved the appearance of the
Downtown along Cleveland Street. However, these efforts are, to some extent,
undermined by the poorly landscaped sections of Cleveland Street outside the Downtown
Core area.
~
'l
';l
Land uses outside of the Downtown Core along Cleveland Street are relatively
unattractive and are poorly landscaped. A remedial landscaping program should be
considered as a top priority for improving this important entryway.
MEMORIAL CAUSE\V A Y
Memorial Causeway is one of the most attractively landscaped streets in Pinellas County.
In addition to serving as an excellent entryway into the Downtown from Clearwater
Beach, the roadway serves the major transportation link between downtown and
Clearwater Beach.
Memorial Causeway is operating at LOS "F". Service levels on the Causeway are
complicated by the frequent opening and closing of the drawbridge, as well as by a
substantial amount of weekend and other off peak traffic associated with the tourist
industry.
NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE
North Fort Harrison Avenue (Alternate U.S. 19) is a four lane roadway within the
existing Downtown, and tapers to a three lane roadway north of Drew Street. Outside
the Downtown area, land uses along the roadway are a wide variety of commercial and
residential developments, many of which are in a deteriorating condition.
The level of service on North Fort Harrison A venue is liE". A substantial LOS increaso
~") is anticipated has been increased (to "B/C") now that the lane re-striping project
has been completed. Some additional improvement in traffic conditions for North Fort
Harrison Avenue may be anticipated should when (and if) the Alternate D,S. 19
designation be is moved to a roadway system further east, as is currently under
consideration proposed by the Florida Department of Transportation. It is conceivable
that some linkage with Missouri or Myrtle A venues will occur as part of this
redesignation of the Alternate U.S. 19 roadway status.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
10
OCTOBER, 1993
From an aesthetic standpoint, North Fort Harrison Avenue is in need of remedial
streetscape landscaping. North Fort Harrison Avenue should also be carefully regulated
to ensure that the scale of development remains relatively small. North Fort Harrison
Avenue is, to some extent, a character defining roadway for Clearwater; it contains a
number of architecturally interesting commercial structures (usually converted from
residential structures). The area is being considered in two a separate zoning studies
s-Rffiy which would address land uses and site design characteristics.
SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE
~
:!
~
.;1
,~
-:"
~:.'
.'
';ii,
'.f..
~;
~'i
~!:
!!
.t
~
'f
J
South Fort Harrison A venue, because of its proximity to Morton Plant Hospital, has not
seen the same deterioration of adjoining land uses as North Fort Harrison Avenue, Many
of the residential and smaller commercial properties along South Fort Harrison Avenue
have been converted to medical office uses. Some new development has occurred;
however, much of this has been in scale with the existing development and contributes
positively to the character of South Fort Harrison Avenue. South Fort Harrison Avenue
is operating at a level of service of between "C" and "D". As with North Fort Harrison
Avenue, the level of service for South Fort Harrison A venue is likely to improve
somewhat if and when the Alternate U.S. 19 designation is moved to other roadways.
:~
~
:.r
'"
".
t~
Due to existing vegetation on private property, landscaping along South Fort Harrison
Avenue is relatively attractive. This entryway should be considered for some form of
remedial landscaping within the pub I ic right-of-way to the extent possible, given the
I imits of existing right-of-way,
COURT STREET
Court Street serves as a major entryway into the Downtown due to its "By-Pass S.R. 60"
designation. West of Missouri A venue, Court Street passes some relatively unobtrusive
land llses and leads the traveler past the Pinellas County Court House complex/campus
and down the bluff to Clearwater Harbor. Court Street is operating at LOS "B".
DREW STREET
Drew Street is another important east/west roadway. East of Myrtle A venue, Drew
Streettraverses attractive older neighborhoods containing residences and offices converted
from residences. This scale of development, and the associated mature landscaping,
creates a nice driving environment for travelers entering and leaving downtown
Clearwater.
?i
~'
~i
'i
"
:!
.:-1
?('
Drew Street is currently operating at LOS liB II within the Downtown. Scheduled
improvements to Drew Street are under consideration by the Florida Department of
Transportation and whieh will widen the roadway to fi'/C laRes '.vest of U.S. 19 (Drew
Street is already five lanes between U .8. 19 and ~kMullen Booth Road) will result in
increased use of the roadway as a major east-west arterial. Once these improvements are
made, Drew Street may be will become known as and used as a "relieverll roadway for
Gulf to Bay Boulevard/Cleveland Street, and could will become a principal route into
Downtown Clearwater. The Drew Street widening project also includes funds for
remedial streetscape landscaping and for bicycle access.
Within the Downtown Core area, Drew Street generally does not exhibit attractive
adjoining land use characteristics; the roadway passes through some older industrialized
areas of the Downtown. Although Drew Street does enjoy an excellent view of
Clearwater Harbor fronl its western end, it serves to separate publicly owned properties
to the east and west along Clearwater Harbor. Realignment of Drew Street, discussed
in greater detail in the Districts section below, is important if the publ ic park area
(Coachman Park) and possibly the Maas Brothers site are to be fully integrated with
publicly owned land directly along Clearwater Harbor.
~..,;
,.
f'
~
"
,.
\;
~
~
CITY OF CLEARW ATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
II
OCTOBER, t 993
;,
-,>
",
.: {:
1".
."f:
~ .i :
,'-
FIGURE 4
DREW STREET REALIGNMENT OPTIONS
::1
',{j
3!
TO BE DELETED
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
12
ocrOBER, 1993
MISSOURI AVENUE
Missouri A venue is the most significant north/south roadway along the eastern part of
Downtown Clearwater. M issouri Avenue effectively terminates at Drew Street, where
it changes its function from an arterial roadway to a local street. Along its arterial
portion in the vicinity of Downtown Clearwater, it is currently operating at level of
service "8". Missouri Avenue is a possible roadway under consideration for the new
Alternate U. S. 19 designati on.
Landscaping along Missouri Avenue is virtually nonexistent; existing land uses are
typically devoid of landscaping and contain no architecturally significant structures.
The redevelopment of the City Hall Annex site and adiacent City-owned property may
proposed East End Project wiIl serve as first step in improving the architectural and
landscaped environment of Missouri A venue. A remedial landscaping project for
Missouri Avenue should be scheduled.
MYRTLE AVENUE
Myrtle Avenue is a four/five lane facility running north/south through the appropriate
center of the Downtown. Myrtle Avenue operates at level of service "A" or "8".
Outside of the Downtown it serves a small industrial area to the south and residential
areas to the north.
Landscaping and land uses along Myrtle A venue are generally not significant. In areas
to the north of Cleveland Street, the land uses are typically unattractive 1***, while to
the south of Cleveland Street, the land uses are more attractive. Myrtle Avenue is
another possible roadway under consideration for the new Alternate U .S, 19 designation.
RATING DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER'S MAJOR ENTRYWAYS/ROADWAYS
ROADWA Y LANDSCAPING LOS LAND USE DRIVING
CONDITIONS
CLEVELAND STREET PIG E PIG F/G
MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY E P E G
N. FT. HARRISON F PIG PIF P/F
S. FT. HARRISON F P G F
COURT STREET F G G G
CHESTNUT STREET F G G G
DREW STREET PIG E PIG G
MISSOURI AVENUE P G P P
MYRTLE A VEN UE F E PIG FIG
KEY
E - EXCELLENT
G - GOOD
F . FAIR
P.POOR
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
13
OCTOBER, 1993
. ." . ". " . . , ' '". l J ' ,
, .' !" "';'~.. .,.,;'!. " : ",f '",:< >~,' ,,'
:":- , ,,' ~,' " >.. ';"~ ',:'> " ." ,'. , ; '\ ',:::"
\ .,'
" . ,
- .. ",' ,;'.
l~' ,
\.": -
. :, t
'.;-3.,: ,
"i . ~:
'.
" '
.t t-;.
,
i,
.. ,
'j' ..!
'"\ ., ,"."
..:..... h "{.:" ,;;.,.,.."11-'\.......:.,,,, ,,'
FIGURE ~5 - ENTRYWAVS, MASS TRANSIT, PINELLAS TRAIL,
PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL TIMES
'. '.
NO CHANGE TO THIS PAGE, EXCEPT
FIGURE RENUMBERING
.',
:,,;
1
i
,
"
i
,I
'~"'lli
. "';:'~
, .",'".:1
,. :::1
",:1
'::';:1
" .:.)
, ~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVBLOPMENT PLAN
14
: OCTOBER, i993
PINELLAS TRAIL
Pinellas Trail is a linear park being constructed by Pinellas County to provide a
bikeway/pedestrian accessway from one end of Pinellas County to the other. The trail
will be well landscaped and will provide a new source of visitors for Downtown
Clearwater. Having Pinellas Trail run through Downtown Clearwater is a significant
positive development for the Downtown, as it will enable a wide variety of trail users
to become more familiar with the Downtown. It is a resource to be encouraged and
preserved through careful attention to land uses along the trail, particularly with regard
to landscaping and buffering of high density residential and nonresidential uses from
the trail. Trail "spurs" to Downtown parks should be promoted and incorporated into
road improvement projects.
PSTA TERMINAL
The PST A terminal serves as a major mass transit station within the Downtown. A
large number of persons utilize the terminal for switching buses to reach a variety of
destinations. Some effort should be made to improve the appearance of the terminal
site, as well as to encourage land uses in the vicinity of the terminal which will serve
persons using the terminal.
FUTURE ACCESS NEEDS
Pedestrian and Bicvcle Improvements. Pinellas Trail serves as a excellent north/south
nonvehicular accessway into the Downtown. However, improved east/west accesses
for nonvehicular travel are needed, Obvious possibilities for these east/west
bikeway/pedestrian accessways include Drew Street and Pierce Street. Providing
pedestrian/bicycle access along Pierce Street would interconnect the Downtown Core
with the proposed Citv-owned redevelopment site at Cleveland Street and Missouri
Avenue E=:Ist End Projoct. Providing bicycle access along Drew Street, as planned, has
the potential of linking Downtown Clearwater and Clearwater Beach with the eastern
portion of Clearwater. Improved pedestrian access along Osceola Avenue would serve
to link a large residential area to the north of Downtown with the Downtown.
Mass Transit Opportunities. A creative mass transit option bringing people from nearby
employment areas (such as Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater Community Hospital, the
industrial area along So. Myrtle Avenue and similar areas) should be carefully
considered. Marketing studies, perhaps in concert with PSTA, would need to be
performed to be determined interest of persons working in these areas in a "Lunchtime
Shuttle" or an "After Work Shuttle" to bring people Downtown during the lunch hour
and evening hours for dining and other entertainment opportunities.
,
!
i
I
I
~
~
1
~
~
t.
"
A second major consideration should be more creative mass transit links between the
Downtown and Clearwater Beach. Currently, the harbor ferry provides ferry service
to Clearwater Beach and the PST A provides twice an hour service between Clearwater
Beach and the mainland areas (primarily Clearwater Mall). However a more organized
and heavily promoted effort needs to be made to link the Beach with the Downtown.
Downtown Clearwater has the potential of serving as a significant source of evening
entertainment for people residing in or visiting Clearwater Beach. Some form of mass
transit, such as a tram or an expanded Jolly Trolley (the mass transit option for
destinations on the Beach), could serve as the impetus to create a highly symbiotic
relationship between these two areas. Downtown Clearwater is isolated enough from
surrounding residential neighborhoods that it could serve as an important entertainment
center for Clearwater Beach, thus allowing some of the more heavily concentrated
entertainment uses to be, in effect, relocated from Clearwater Beach to the Downtown.
These mass transit options need to be explored in greater detail to Downtown
Clearwater in concert with any significant efforts to bring entertainment uses.
Spooi=:ll Tr=:lnl;port=:ltion Are=:l. Duo to o><isting high tr=:lffio ',olumel; =:Ind oom:trJints on
\\'idening :md othorwiso improving lovols of Gervico on mJny of the Downto'Nn'l; mJjor
rO=:ld'N=:IYl;, it is reoommended th=:lt =:I Speci=:ll TrJnGportJtion AmJ 1ST.") designation bo
pursued for much of tho Dm"mtown :md its Jssoci=:ltoci--eAtryw=:IYs. Tho ST ^
design=:ltion for Downtown CleJrw::Jtor, inoludod =:IS =:I futuro work priority in
Clo=:lr"...=:Iter's ComprehenGi'/e Pbn, is a pl=:lnning =:Ind growth man=:lgement tool thJt
reoognizes =:Ire=:lG of ooncentr=:ltod urban dovelopmont h=:lving Gignific=:lnt rogion=:ll or
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
15
OCTOBER,1993
'.
,j
{
subregional importanco. Onoo this rooognition is mado, somo rol~)(ation of lovol of
sorvice standards o~n bo adoptod, ~s needod and as justified, by tho local govornmont.
This ~lIo'Ns oontinuod development of thoso significant urban ~re3S to ocour consistent
with ooncurrency requiremonts. Figure 6 iIIustratos tho PfGf*}sod ST A.
~
L
J
~
Coordination of this proposod STA dosignation with tho Florida Dop~rtmont of
Transportation, tho Tampa B~y Rogion~1 Pbnning Council and othor roviow agencies
';vill bo initbted in two phasos ~ftor final ~pproval of this Downtown Plafh-
i
S
~j
~
l(
.;,
1!
DISTRICTS
"
j
J.:I
'.Ii
?;
~~
;;:'i'
'1~
{
"
~
In terms of both how the Downtown functions and how the Charter established for this plan can be
implemented, Downtown Clearwater can be divided into three separate districts.
Each of these districts contain special characteristics relating to six major issues: function; linkages;
assembly possibilities; design issues; zoning issues; and priority land uses.
The Function issue refers to the discrete land use characteristics of each district within the Downtown.
For example one district may be primarily suitable for intensive office and retail development, while
another district may be more suited for less intensive mixed residential and office use development.
linkages involve the specific ways each district relates to the other districts within the Downtown.
Assembly Possibilities refer to the ownership pattern, land use, property value, and property condition
characteristics of the district. These characteristics determine how feasible it might be to assemble
land for redevelopment purposes. The discussion in the assembly possibilities section of each district
will also include the types of redevelopment which should be promoted through public interaction with
the private sector.
Design Issues are concerned with the aesthetic relationship within and between districts.
Zoning Issues deal with specific zoning requirements which must be either established, revised or
reaffirmed for each of the districts. Zoning will be a primary means of implementing the purpose of
this Downtown Plan; consequently, it is important to fully conceptualize zoning issues for each district.
That is, it is necessary to clearly specify what types of development are desired in each district, and
promote such development through zoning regulations. A copy of the proposed revisions to the Urban
Center zoning district (including the various subdistricts) is included in Appendix~. Soecific intensitv
standards for each district are also listed under this section headinQ.
Priority Land Uses are either those uses for which Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) funding
consideration should be given or for which special regulatory allowances should be made. That is,
these are uses for which CRA funds may be utilized, on a case by case basis, to attract development,
or are uses which require special adjustments to City regulations to incorporate into the Downtown.
BA YFRONT DISTRICT
The Bayfront District (see Figure Q+) consists of the existing area covered by Urban Center (Bayfront)
zoning. This is the area containing Coachman Park, the Maas Brothers property, the Calvary Baptist
Church, Clearwater City Hall and much of the Pinellas County Courthouse and administrative buildings.
The Bayfront District is characterized by its natural features, primarily its location along the bluff
leading to Clearwater Harbor. The height restrictions in the existing UC(B) zoning are relatively
restrictive (60 feet); structure height and location in this area is also governed by comprehensive plan
considerations dealing with the maintenance of the natural rise of the Bayfront bluff (at and below the
28 foot contour line above mean sea level).
FUN CTION
The Bayfront District functions as the governmental, cultural, and recreational center of
downtown. The large amount of publicly or nonprofit owned property makes this area suitable
for redevelopment with recreation and office purposes in mind. The Bayfront District, because
of its location on the Bayfront bluff, serves as the most recognizable and visually important
district within Clearwater's Downtown.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
16
OCTOBER, 1993
"
FIGURE 6
PROPOSED ST A
TO' BE DELETED
, "
.'t'
.' ,
,CITY OF CLBARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVBLOPMENT PLAN
''l
LINKAGES
The Bayfront District serves as a major area of employment of the Downtown, and, as
such, needs to be carefully considered in any mass transit, pedestrian or bikeway
plans. Restaurant and other entertainment uses should be encouraged to locate in the
vicinity of the Bayfront District to take advantage of this employment base. Scheduling
of activities at the Coachman Park should be increased to draw more people to the
Downtown. Allowing push-cart vendors on public property through franchise
arrangements (which should be drawn up to specify signage, vendor attire, areas of
operation, insurance requirements, etc.) would also be another means of encouraging
increased public use of the bayfront.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Due to the large amount of public and nonprofit ownership in this district, the assembly
possibilities for redevelopment are quite good. Also, City land holdings, including the
Maas Brothers property, along the west side of Osceola Avenue between Cleveland
and Drew Streets involve contain a significant amount of land above the 28 foot
contour (the" bluff") which could permit redevelopment. Public land USOG in this :Jroa
foil to tako odvantag() of tho harbor view&- offered by this location :Jnd aro usos which
could oosily be located olsewhoro. Property values (although not for tax purposes) are
fairly high.
DESIGN ISSUES
Onco funds can be so allocated, romoval of the Maas 8rothorc building should
commenc(), giviAg a significantly mero expansivo vio\\' of Cloar-.vator Harbor both from
the Downtown and of tho Downto'.vn from Memorial C:lUS8W:J', :Jnd Cloarwater BO:Joh.
This will greatl'l improve tho aesthetios of this major ontrywo', into the Dov'Into'Nn.
Consideration should be given for the removal of surface parking at the Maas Brothers
and Coachman Park sites. Replacing this parking with a parking garage would
represent an enormous visual improvement to the area, as well as maintaining and
improving public parking opportunities in this area. Such a project could be tied into
a redevelopment project or projects along the west side of Osceola A venue east of the
"bluff" and could also serve the parking needs of possible future private development
east of Osceola Avenue.
Coachman Park is currently not interconnected with the harbor waterfront due to the
existence of Drew Street which serves as a physical separation between these two
important recreational amenities. As a consequence, the harborfront property is
significantly underutilized. Closure and vacation of Drew Street south of the parking
for the Clearwater Harbor ferry parking area should be considered and pursued.
Removal of this physical barrier between Coachman Park and the waterfront would
result in a significant combination of two important amenities. The waterfront could
then be developed with boardwalk features which would be interconnected with
Coachman Park. There are State and other nonmunicipal funding sources available to
assist in providing new public waterfront access.
Vacation of this section of Drew Street could be accomplished through two alternative
means:
1. It is possible that eventual replacement of Memorial Causeway drawbridge
will allow a realignment of the causeway to interconnect with Drew
Street instead of Cleveland Street (S.R. 60 - Business). This realignment
would enable the waterview section of Drew Street to be vacated, as well
as providing a quicker route to the beach, given anticipated improvements
to Drew Street. Drawbacks for this proposal include: (a) relocation of the
central focus of Downtown from Cleveland Street to Drew Street; and (b)
substantial environmental permitting requirements for such a realignment.
~
2. A second option would involve realignment of Drew Street and Osceola
Avenue and Cleveland Street through a reverse curve street orientation.
City owned property at the southeast corner of Osceola Avenue and Drew
Street and at the northwest corner of Osceola Avenue and Cleveland
Street could be utilized to ensure proper traffic engineering design for this
road realignment. Rerouting Drew Street in this matter would afford
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
18
OCTOBER,1993
'l" , , "::~~ "", :"2i~ :
"
, '.
FIGURE .6...-+ - BA YFRONT DISTRICT
,
I
~ j
I
. j
t
".1
j
"':!
.1
:'1
.,1
,)1
NO CHANGE TO THIS PAGE, EXCEPT
FIGURE RENUMBERING AND ADDED PRIORITY
USES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
travelers the opportunity to drive in front of the Coachman Park/Maas Brothers/Public Library
properties, thereby providing a very scenic view of major Downtown amenities and of Clearwater
Harbor. Potential drawbacks to the proposal include: (a) loss of public land for transportation features;
and (b) possible interference with the traffic function of Drew Street.
ZONING ISSUES
A major zoning issue which is related to the design issues for the Bayfront District is that of structure
height. The Urban Center (Bayfrontl Zoning District contains a maximum height requirement of 60
feet. This height requirement limits development along the bayfront to an appropriate level with regard
to the structures which exist and will be built to the east. That is, height restrictions allow taller
structures to be constructed which will have a view of Clearwater Harbor. Another benefit of this
height regulation is that the buildings which are constructed on the bluff will not have an overwhelming
appearance of height when viewed from Memorial Causeway while traveling east; the height restriction
ensures that these structures will not "overpower" the visual surroundings.
Other zoning issues affecting the Bayfront District include deletion of the medical clinic permitted use
and allowing push-cart vending only on public property. Specifying the conditional uses that are
allowed in the District is needed, rather than opening this district up to all uses allowed in the Core and
Eastern Corridor Districts. Recommended is the provision of a new conditional use for the Bayfront
and other Urban Center zoning subdistricts - bed and breakfast inns. This use will allow the
commercial use of older residential structures in the Downtown, thereby encouraging the continued
maintenance of these structures as both a link with Clearwater's past and as character-defining
buildings within the Downtown. An added benefit will be the visitors who will be brought Downtown
by these uses.
SPECIFIC USE INTENSITY STANDARDS FOR THE BAYFRONT DISTRICT *
DENSITY
42 DWELLING UNITS OR HOTEL UNITS PER ACRE
UNLESS FURTHER RESTRICTED BY THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DENSITY LIMITS ON
DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL ZONE
FLOOR AREA RATIO
2.0
. FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS, USE INTENSITY SHAll BE GOVERNED BY THE MIXED USE FORMULA PROVIDED IN SECTION 40,007 OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE.
PRIORITY LAND USES
Within the Bayfront district, the following uses should be considered for CRA funding based upon their
overall contribution to the purpose and charter statements.
... Government offices.
... Cultural uses.
... Recreational uses, inCluding expansion of existing parkland.
... Waterfront amenities.
...
Entertainment/retail uses which take advantage of the water views offered by the
Bayfront location.
j
,i
I
I
I
i
!
I
I
, i
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
... Convention/conference facilities.
... Residential uses.
Also within this district, special provision needs to be made to allow vendors to operate on publicly-
owned land. The provision of vendors in this area could draw people to Coachman Park during dining
hours.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
20
OCTOBER. 1993
CORE DISTRICT
The Core District includes most of the existing Urban Center (Core) zoning in Downtown Clearwater.
It is bounded by Ft. Harrison and Osceola Avenues to the west, Jones Street to the north, Myrtle
Avenue to the east and Turner Street to the south. Figure.2 S illustrates the Core District.
I,
\
."~
t~:
f'.;
1-0.
FUNCTION
The function of the Core District is to serve as the most densely developed portion of the Downtown
Clearwater. This district is where the high rise office complexes have recently been constructed and
where they should be continued to be encouraged to be developed. The Core District, because of its
relative isolation from substantial amounts of existing residential uses, should serve as the commercial
entertainment center for Clearwater. That is, restaurants, nightclubs, and similar activities should be
encouraged to locate within the Core District. Because of the large employment base in the Core
District, retail and entertainment uses should be encouraged to locate on the first floor of new
developments.
1
h
~
~
i
.i..
'"
LINKAGES
The Core District is the center of public parking and public transportation for Clearwater's Downtown.
PST A transfer station is located in the Core District, and two large parking garages, owned and
operated by the City of Clearwater, are also located in the Core District. Due to the presence of these
facilities and the concentrated development pattern (with little or no separation between buildings),
surface parking should be generally discouraged in this district.
~"'.l
*:
,-":
"
~:<i,
.-,
t~
;.,
(;
Ii
;.
..~
'/)
"
~
#
An exception to this "rule" would be surface parking which links existing parking facilities in the district
to one another, thereby expanding the function and scope of the existing parking. The purchase of
the Kravas buildingL and its conversion to surface parking, meets this criterion.
}
~.
~
"
'5
~.i~
As the Core District abuts a large concentration of governmental office use to its west, the
employment concentration in this area serves as a natural clientele for restaurants, retail and
entertainment activities to be located in the Core District. The new Station Square Park which has
been developed in the Core District is an important amenity for this area. Another similar park should
be built to encourage entertainment and outdoor activities in the southern portion of the Core District
within the next five to ten years.
It
,~,
."
~
~
;~
~
."
.~:;.
~-i
~;
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
There is a large amount of publicly owned property within the Core District. The City Police and Fire
Departments are located within the Core District, along with a vacant block also owned by the City.
Since these properties will be of less use to the City in the future (once the new City Hall site has been
developed), the assembly possibilities in the area involving publicly owned property are quite good.
There are also other under-utilized and vacant properties within the Core District which could be
assembled into areas suitable for fairly large scale development. Such assembly possibilities within this
district should be encouraged, primarily for large scale office development, entertainment uses, or
residential development.
.'
,\
i
.
~
DESIGN ISSUES
The Core District can be considered from two perspectives from a desion standpoint. First, the should
promoto t311 struotures in tho Downtown Jro:J. Ccurrent development patterns, including the Sun Bank
and Clearwater Towers projects, :ue oXJmples of the type of developmont which should could continue
to be encouraged in this area. Under this approach, t+he Core would should serve as the pinnacle for
Downtown structure height, with structure heights generally decreasing to the east and west. The
second option would be to develop a comprehensive streetscape!urban desiQn proQram. possiblv a
"Main Street" oroQram, for the Core. This program mioht center on promotinQ the predominant small-
scale development pattern alonQ Cleveland Street and adioinino roadwavs throuQh a facade
improvement prooram and associated zoninQ and desiQn reoulations. Additional study of these two
ootions should be a priority proiect.
~
~
~
~
~~
~
\1
,if.
.1:-
,'1'
"
j
.~
d
...
~
"l
'1;
~
;~
J
"
.:-,
,:;
Surface parking other than on-street parkino, temporarv public parkino lots on public property set aside
for eventual redevelopment, and "linked" parkin~ (such as the Kravas property parkino lot. should
Qenerally be discouraged in this district, and new landscaping and design requirements for parking
garages should be developed. All new parking garages, whether public or private, should be required
to utilize ground floor areas for retail, restaurant or entertainment type uses in order to improve the
relationship of these structures with the pedestrian environment of the Core District. A oreliminarv
draft land development code amendment to establish these improved reoulations is provided as
Appendix E.
e'
]1',
....
t~,
'Ii
~j
(
~
~
r
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
21
OCTOBER, 1993
ZONING ISSUES
In order to further develop this portion of Downtown, the Urban Center (Core) zoning district
regulations need to be carefully revised to limit any unnecessary restrictions on desired development
like large scale offices and entertainment uses. However, the higher intensity uses should be deleted
as permitted uses in this zoning district to protect the desired land uses from high intensity or high
traffic generating uses. Street vendors, sidewalk cafes and similar activities should be allowed in the
Core District. Eventual zoninQ code amendments addressina the" Main Street" desiQn approach should
be considered if this approach is adoPted.
SPECIFIC USE INTENSITV STANDARDS FOR THE CORE DISTRICT
DENSITY
UNLI M ITED
FLOOR AREA RATIO
UNLIMITED
PRIORITY LAND USES
Priority land uses within the Core district include:
~ Ground floor retail/entertainment uses.
~ Office uses.
~ Residential development.
These uses should be considered for CRA funding due to their impact on the overall function of the
Core district. The Core district is a strong office district, containing the major private office
development in Downtown Clearwater. Ground floor retail and entertainment uses attract people to
the Core, do not detract from office uses on higher floors, and fit within a variety of potential
development schemes for the Downtown including tho "'N()rld ()f Clearwator" propos31 to bring :l multi
cultural dining :lnd retail salas concept to Downtown CloarwatoF.
Also within the Core district, provision should be made to increase pedestrian interest through the
permitting of vendors and sidewalk cafes. These uses create an active ambiance in the Downtown
which will help draw people to Downtown Clearwater.
EASTERN CORRIDOR DISTRICT
The Eastern Corridor District is centered along Cleveland Street east of Myrtle Avenue. This district
was recently "expanded" by reinterpretation of the legal description establishing the eRA area to
include additional City-owned propertv south of Cleveland Street the proposed E:lst End Projeot sito.
The general district boundaries are Myrtle Avenue to the west, Drew, Grove and NE Cleveland Streets
to the north, Fredrica Drive to the east, and Gould Street to the south. Figure I ~ illustrates the
Eastern Corridor District.
FUNCTION
The primary functions of this district are to: (1) Provide a retail and/or residential anchor to stimulate
development within the entire Downtown (particularly through the development of the City-owned
propertv at Cleveland Street and Missouri Avenue East End Proje&t); and (2) Promote redevelopment
of large areas of vacant and underutilized property. The established development pattern in this district
is retail oriented in nature and is more open than in the Core District, with greater setbacks between
buildings. Surface parking in this District is to be encouraged due to the retail orientation, structure
separation patterns and the District's lineal nature.
LINKAGES
From a transportation aspect, Cleveland Street serves as the major connector between the Eastern
Corridor District and the other districts. The proposed redevelopment proiect at Cleveland Street and
Missouri Avenue East End projoGt should serve as a mechanism to draw people to Downtown;
consequently, it is important to provide some form of public transportation as a link between
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
22
OCTOBER, 1993
. I
I
I
i
j
i
I
,
1
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
.....". 1,",
,~::",'~''':'"
1 .~,
<i'; "';,';
',.:,.":;. j ,
01."
"'r","
'; f~
FIGURE 6 8 - CORE DISTRICT
NO CHANGE TO THIS PAGE, EXCEPT
FIGURE RENUMBERING AND ADDED PRIORITY
USES
,"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
23
.;...',:....
.:,
,.'.
CITY OF CLEARWATER'
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
24
OCTOBER, 1993
. .. l ~
"'.1'
the Eastern Corridor District and the Core and Bayfront Districts. This link can be through public
trolleys or short destination bus service coordinated through PSTA. Also important is the need to
promote improved pedestrian and bicycle activity and access to this area. A bikeway link utilizing
Pierce Street would be an important method of providing the needed transportation accessibility
between the Eastern Corridor District and the other two main Downtown districts.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Due to large area property ownership patterns and large public ownership, assembly
possibilities in this area are quite good. Public encouragement for such assembly
should be directed towards a mixed use development pattern concentrating on retailL
residential and office& uses.
DESIGN ISSUES
Because Cleveland Street serves as the major entryway to Clearwater's Downtown,
it is important that landscaping and structural appearance issues be carefully
considered in this district. A unified landscaping program needs to be developed for
the Eastern Corridor District (principally along Cleveland Street); this landscaping plan
should be extended beyond the Eastern Corridor District in order to increase its
effectiveness. Surface parking should be required to be located behind structures
fronting on Cleveland Street (as has been done with the former Barnett Bank building),
rather than in the front of these buildings.
ZONING ISSUES
In this area, surface ffi.vel parking is an important consideration. Because the district
is fairly large, such parking needs to be carefully sited with regard to anticipated
development patterns. The City-owned redevelopment site in this area E:lst End
Projoct will serve as a good opportunity for the City of Clearwater to define desired
surface parking standards for this area. From a design standpoint, zoning regulations
should be developed to require that surface parking not be located directly adjacent to
Cleveland Street, but should be provided to the rear of the structures. It is also
appropriate to allow the more intense types of development only as conditional uses.
Street vendors, sidewalk cafes and similar activities should be allowed in the Eastern
Corridor District.
SPECIFIC USE INTENSITY STANDARDS FOR THE EASTERN CORRIDOR DISTRICT *
DENSITY
70 DWELLING UNITS OR HOTEL UNITS PER ACRE
FLOOR AREA RATIO
3.0
FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS, USE INTENSITY SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE MixeD USE FORMULA PROVIDED IN SECTION 40,007 OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE.
PRIORITY LAND USES
Priority land uses within the Eastern Corridor district include:
.. Retail/entertainment uses.
.. Residential development.
.. Govornmont oOffices.
.. Sidewalk cafes and vendors.
The Eastern Corridor district, because of its substantial frontage along the major
thoroughfare leading into the Downtown (Cleveland Street), is an excellent area for
retail/entertainment type uses. This street frontage provides the visibility that such
uses need in order to thrive. Residential development or govornment offices would
possibly be alternative uses to support these retail/entertainment uses. As with the
Core district, the provision of vendors and sidewalk cafes in the Eastern Corridor
district will promote interest in the Downtown.
Figure 84-() illustrates each of the three districts within the Downtown area.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
25
OcroBER, 1993
il....'
i:~: '.,. "'.", '
FIGURE 8 .1-Q
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTS
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
26
# ',:".
',.
'., :~ ~. '. . .'
"
. ,~ .
SIGNAGE
','I
Signage is an important issue for any downtown. In Downtown Clearwater, the signage issue is
complicated by the way the various districts function. For example, the Bayfront and the Core Districts
are in a pedestrian-oriented area, while the Eastern Corridor is more oriented to the automobile.
Consequently, recent revisions to the existing City sign regulations have taken into account these
differences in function.
Signage in Downtown Clearwater should be festive and active, in keeping with the outdoor-orientation
of the Downtown. Provisions are made in the sign regulations to promote creative sign design. In
particular, the regulations promote signage having the following characteristics or design:
- Use of classic or historic design or style
- Use of creative images reflecting Clearwater's waterfront heritage
- Use of symbols rather than text
- Use of hand-painted lettering or graphics
- Use of sculpted wood, metal or other materials
The improved sign regulations reflect the design and use of buildings. For example, a large, multistory
office building should be allowed signage identifying the building and freestanding or attached directory
signage identifying the building's tenants. The building identification sign should be oriented to
automobile traffic, while the directory sign should be pedestrian oriented.
Finally, lJublic signage should reflect the Downtown's theme. This sign age should be festive and
should include the use of banners or other "active" signage. Public signage, in particular important
identification signage such as parking garage direction signage, should be designed to be relatively
large and visually striking in order to draw the public's attention to the important message conveyed
by this signage.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
OCTOBER,1993
.1
'. ., ;..\" '. ~ ,''1', ..........' t
27
. ':~~
,','
,.,~<.~
AD9EN9YM
The Downtown Development PlJn oonsists of three distriots 'Nhioh h~ve speoifio funotions v.'ithin the
plan, and speoifio Urb::m Center zoning designations ~ssooiated ,-,vith these distriots. These distriots
~re all intended to be under the purview of the Community Redevelopment Ageno., (CR/\).
Four other oreac ~re proposed to be added to the overall land use plan (Comprehensive Pion)
Downtown planning ol~Gsifio~tion for possible eventu~1 inolusion in the CRA areo. These ~reos ~re
looated aajaoent to tho Bayfront distriot to the north, the Core distriot to the south, ond the Eostern
Corridor dbtriot to both tho north and south. The proposed land use plan designation for these ~reas
is Central BusineGs Distriot, the s~me as the existing Downtown areas. There nre no zoning oh~nges
immediately- planned for the arens adjoining the Bayfront ~nd Core distriots. The proposed zoning for
the north and south are~s adjnoent to the Eastern Corridor distriot is Urban Center (Transition) nnd
Urban Center (Eastern Corridor), recpeoti\lely.
V/hilc the zoning dictriots for the areas nssooiJted \\'ith the Bayfront ~nd Core distriots are not ourrently
proposed for oh~nge, Cle~rwater City staff has reoeived direetion from the City Commission to
investigate the development of ~ "performance zoning" zoning distriot to be established for these
:Jroas. Under this proposed zoning distriet, Gpeoifio, desired land uses 't"t'i11 be provided with substantial
devcMopment inoentives. In the northern ~reo, provision will be mode to estnblish inoentives for
primarily residential uses although some m:lnuf~oturing uses moy also reoeive development inoentive
:Jllo'Nanoes. In the southern ~rea, inoentive uses inolude mixed offioe and residential projeots DS well
:JS manufaoturing/industrial Wpe uses.
While thece ::Ireas arc not ourrently proposed to be within the formal "redovelopment area" for
Downto'A'n Clearw~:er, the areas ~re oonsidered to be important to the suooess of the Downtown
beoause of their location:J1 oh~raoteristios. The northern area adjnoent to both the B~'ffront ~nd Core
distriots, along Cleorw~ter Hmbor, is oonsidered to be a prime mea for residenti::!1 development. The
western portions of this area are oonsidered JC having the potentiJI for residential development due
to th-c existence of the Pinellas Trail in this area.
The southern ~rc~ ~djaoent to the Core distriot, due to its property O'./:nership patterns and loo~tion
J(ijaeent to the Urban Center (Core) zoning, is ::! likely areJ for redevelopment.
The northern area odjaoent to the Eastern Corridor Distriot is important to the Downto'Nn PI~n beeause
of it!; looation :Jlong the north eentral edge of the Do'..,ntown. This looation, near amoll offioeG and
single family residential uses, requires thJt I~nd uses in this area be oarefully oontrolled. This 'NiII help
the Downtown to be a "good neighbor" to the surrounding neighborhood.
The southam arc::! ::!djaoent to the Eastern Corridor distriot is important to the Downto'un PI~n beonuse
it oontains property on the periphery of the EaGt End Projeot, as 'Nell ~s are~s suit::lble for mixed use
(rcsieential/offioe) development. There is signifioant publio ownership of land in this area.
NORTH\'~.'EST EXPANSION AREA
~ce areas :::Ire disoussed in more detail below.
The northwest e)(p~nsion are:::l is ~n :::Irea of mixod residentinl, oommereial, offioe,Dnd quaGi industrial,
uses looated direotl'; to the north of the Ba'/front and Cora distriots. It is bounded by Cleor'^'ater
Harbor to tho wcst, Niohol::::on Street to the north, the Pinellas Trail and Myrtle /\venuc to the east, and
Jones Street to the south (see Figure 1\ 1 ). The largest individual use in this ~rea is the City of
Clearwater Utilities Group and Puroh::Jsing Division Headquarters looated weGt of Myrtle Avenue in the
50uttleJst oorner of this distriot. There nre also two l::Jrge oondominium developments on Clearwater
Harbor in the western p~rt of this arc~. ' ,
crrv OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWt-l DEVELOPMENT PLAt-l
28
OcrOBER, 1993
'~ :~
FUNCTION
Tho northwest oxpansion aroa sorves as a support distriot for both tho Bayfront and
tho Coro districts. It has boon addod to tho land uso planning olassification for
Downtown for sovoral roasonG:
.. To inoludo a prodominatol't' rosidontial :lroa into tho Downtown planning area
in ordor to improvo the functional rolJtionship botwoon the oxisting Coro and
Bayfront distriots and this rosidontiJI orea ::along Cloarw::ator ~Jrbor.
.. To tJko adv:mtago of the linear park offorod by tho Pin 011 as Trail to oncourage
higher donsity rosidential rodovolopment of portions of this ar.ea:-
.. To mako allowancos for supplomontary commercial acti-vity in support of the
Righer donsity recidcntial devolopmont.
.. To provide 0 looation for loss intonsivo, "high tooh" industrial assombly and
manufaoturing typo usos in closo proximity to Downto'.'vn Clo::lrwator.
LINKAGES
Tho northwost expansion ::IreJ is ::In area of widoly varied land uses, Rodovelopment
of this aroo ......ith high intonsity rosidential ~md low intonsity manufaoturing/assembly
type I:JSOS will ore::lto In aroa of strong support for tho Core and B::Iyfront districtG.
Creating a rosidontial/job baso in this area will 3110w for J dynamic intorplay botweon
this areJ and tho two adjJcont Downtown districts.
Improvomont of this aroa's aooess to the oxiGting Cora Jnd Bayfront districts should
bo an important componant of future planning for this area. Sinco tho aroa is boing
targetod for high donsity rosidontbl do':olopment, it is ::appropriate to considor a now
urban parl< in this aroa ovor tho next fivo to 1 0 "OJrs, deponding upon tho oxtont that
now development occurs. Linkago of this urban park with tho Pinellas Trail sooms to
bo a logical connection.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Privato assemblv of land in this aroa appoars likoly, ospociall'/ along Cloarwater Harbor
whore thoro is a strong potontial for highor donsity rosidontiJI USOG. In tho \'\'ostorn
portion of this oxpansion aroa thoro is a largo amount of publioly ownod proporty,
including tho Utilitios/Purchasing proporty oVlnod by tho Cit',' of Cloar'...,ator. Tho
oxisting, variod land USOG in thiG aroa tond to undorvaluo this property from a tax and
m::arkot vClluation stondpoint, croating a potenti31 Jssombly possibility.
DeSIGN ^ND ZONING ISSUES
Under tho "porformanoe zoning" approaoh proposed for this aroa, substantial donsity
and height bonuses will ba providod to rosidontial devolopments whioh moot critoria to
bo ostablishod. It would soom oppropriato to 3110w vor,; tall rosidontial struoturos in
this aroa in ordor to promoto tho Goonio views of Clearw3tor Harbor. \^laterfront
pfOportios, bOGauso of their IOGation, should bo somo'Nhat moro rostriotod in allowable
height than properties furthor to tho 03st. Tho Pinollas Trail, which runs through this
expansion areJ, 'Nill onhanoo tho livability of this ar03 as now dovelopmont ocours.
I
I
I
" ~
Industrial/assembly uses which arc allmllod should bo oontrollod rogarding tho t'(pos
of uses and ovorall site dosign in ordor to minimizo thoir- potential nogativo impaot on
surrounding residentbl developmont.
PRIORITY L^ND USES
As has boen disCUSGod, tho priority 13nd uses for this oxpJnsion aroa will be high
eensitv' rosidontiol and "high toch" mJnufaoturing/aGsombl'l usos. Tho doprossod
proporty values, along with tho gonoral undorutilization of tho proporty in this areo, the
relatbely substantial amount of public ownorship, and tho exceptional waterfront ,..iO'NS
offerod by the bluff looation along Cloan"lJtor Harbor, aro oonsidorod to bo positive
factors whioh will promoto tho privato rodovelopmont of this aroa.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
, DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
29
OcrOBER, 1993
,
"", ~
SOUTHYlEST &XP.I\NSION AREA
The southwest exp~nsion aro::l oonsists ef :3 relatively small area of mixed 13nd USGS dirootly to tho
south of tho Core district. It is boundod bl{ Fort Harrison Avenuo to tho wost, Chm:tnut Stroot to the
north, Myrtle ::Ind E::Ist Avenues to- tAO east, and Druid Re:Jd to tho south (soo Figure ^ 2).
FUNCTION
biko tho northwost expansion ::Iroa, tho southwest oxpansien area is also Gonsidorod
to be ::I support ::IreQ tor tho Core distriot ::Ind Dovmtown Cloarwater 36 :J wholo. Tho
aro~ oonsists of a v3riet., of commoroial 3nd office usos. Within this are3, hO'NOVOf,
a variot'{ of mixod rosidontial/offioo dovolopmont should bo oncouragod, as woll as
possiblo low intensity m:Jnufacturing/:Jssembly typo uses.
!
LINKAGES
As previously montiened, the southwest expansion aro~ oont:Jins Q v:Jrioty of 13nd
usos. Promoting high intonsit., residontial do'.'olopment :Jnd industrial/:lssombly usos
at::l "high toch" naturo in thic :Jrea will ~lIow it to become a streng support ~roa for the
Cora district. An urban p:uk should be doveloped in this ~lrO::l within tho next five to
1 0 't'o~rs in order to suppert antioipated residontbl dovelopment. ^ regional
storm water retention projoot is likely to bo developed in this arO::l, and tho proposed
park oould bo designed into the retontion wojeGt.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
i\ssombly possibilitios are rel~ti'.'el'l good in this are:J due to tho variety of bnd uses,
But such ~ssembly is hampered by tho number of rebtivel'{ sm~lIlots. Thore are sarno
properties of significant size under individual o\\'nemhip; those properties could bo
expected to develop first.
DESIGN AND ZONING ISSUES
Improvod open space in this aroa could bo aohieved through the croation of :J regional
stormwator retention facility :md through the developmont of an urban park. C::Ireful
planning of thoso fe:Jtures could enhanoo tho liv:::Ibility of this area as new residential
dovelopmont ocours. It is important that tho residential development of this :::Iroa be
shielded from thoso industrial/assombly usee that do occur, This can be accomplishod
through specific porform:mco standards tor nonresidontial developmont.
PRIGRITY LAND USES
Priority bnd usos within the southwest expansion district have been discussod at
length abovo. Thoso uses aro:
.. High density residonti:ll.
.. Mixod residenti::lI/office.
NORTHEAST &XP.I\NSION AREA
I
I
1
'I
.. La....' intensity industrial/::Issombly uses.
The nertheast oxpansion aroa is a rol:::ltivel', small ar03 containing :J mixture of small soale land usos.
It serl/OS, to somo oxtontl as ::I buffor botwoon tho mora intonsive development to., the south and the
residontial and small offiGe areas to tho north. Its boundarios :Jre: Myrtlo Avenuo to tho wost, Draw
Stroet to tho north, Groonwood !',vonuo to tho oast, and Grovo Stroet to the south (soo Figure /\ 3).
'I
FUNCTIGN
This :::Iroa will sor'lo :::I mixod uso/support function for tho Eastern Corridor and Core
Qistriot. Tho primary usos in this :::Iroa willlikoly bo smallor offioos and-F&sidonti:::ll uses.
In particular, tho interior portion of this oxpansion :uea (propertios othor than those
fro-nting en Drew Stroot) is well suited for residontial USOG duo to its proximity to both
the Core District ::Ind surrounding rosidontial noighborhood.
LINKAGES
This aroa servos as nn "edgo" area for Downtown Clo:Jrwator. TR:Jt is, it is 3 oritio31
Bo~ndary area which neods c:::lroful dovelopment in order to onsuro that the Dewntown
as a whole is compatiblo with nO:::lrby rosidential ::md small offioe dovelopmeRt.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
30
OcrOBER, 1993
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
ASGombl',' possibilitios in this aroa ~ro good duo to ~ rel~ti\'ol't' I~rgo ~mount of vooant
I~nd. Assombly for rosidontiol/offioo usos should bo a priority, p~rticul3rly whon mixod
uso projeots cont~ining 60% or moro rosidontiol devolopment ~ro proposed.
DESIGN ISSUES
Duo to tho ne:lrby loo~tion of rosidontiol ond sm~1I offico devolopment, it is important
th3t the sC:llo of structures in tho areo, as well os tho t'lpo of usos, bo comp~tiblo-witR
thoso no~rby usos. The dovolopment requiromonts for tho Limited Office zoning distriot
to tho north of this oroa along Drew Stroet '.'vill sorvo, to somo oxtont, ~s a buffor for
moro intonso usos '.<vhich m~'t' bo do',olopod in this aroa. Howevor, this buffor ~roa is
not lorgo, so it is dosirablo that rolotivoly low struotural hoight and rol3tively low floor
~rea ratio t'lpo dovelopment is allowod to bo construotod in this oxpansion aroa.
ZONING ISSUES
Booauso of tho proximity of residentiol dovolopmont, a loss intonsive zoning distriot is
~ppropri~te for this ~rea. Suoh:l zoning district would promoto rolativoly low intom~ity
typo offico dovolopmont, ~s 'Noll as modium high donsity rosidontial dovolopmont (up
to 28 dwelling units par ~cro). In Appondix 0, the proposod modifioations to the Urbon
Centor District rogulations includo 0 new Urban Centor Transition IUC(T)) cubdistrict.
PRIORITY LAND USES
VlJithin the northeost oxp::msion ::Irea, the following con bo oonsidorod priority usos:
~ Medium high density rosidentiol.
.. Mixed offico/residentiJl uses.
Thoso usos provide an ~ppropriote tronsition from the moro intonse Eostern Corridor
zoning to the Gouth and tho offioo and residential usos to tho north.
SOUTHEAST EXPANSION AREA
The southoost oxp~nsion are~ is :lnother rolotively sm:lll ~reo contoining ~ mixturo of sm~1I scalo lond
uses. Tho boundorios of this aro Myrtlo Avonuo to tho '.flost, Pioroo and Gould Stroots to tho north,
Missouri ."-'/onue to tho e~st, and tho northern side of Court Stroot to the south (soo Figuro ^ <I).
FUNCTION
Tho function of this oxp~nsion oro~ is, Iiko tho northo~st oxponsion :lreo, is to sorve 35
:l support distriot for both tho Cora ~nd Eastorn Corridor Distriots. This distriot is
somowh~t larger th~n tho northoast oxp~nsion aro~, and does'not servo ~s ~n"odgo"
distriot to tho somo extent. Duo to oxisting dO'/olopmont pattorns ond the oxistonoo
of a m~jor- artori~1 (Court Stroot) through this District, rot::lil uses havo occurrod ::lnd
should bo onoour~god.
LINKAGES
Tho oxistonoo of Court Stroet and Chestnut Streot \".'ithin this aro~ make it an
import~nt in terms of ~oooss to Downtown Clo~rw:ltor. Boo~uso of this nooo&s
oriont::ltion, it is important th~t dovolopmont olong the so m:ljor ~cooss'.'\'a','s be
controllod in terms of l::lndsoaping and othor appo~r~nce issuos. 8oc~uso tho :lrO::l is
promotod in this pion as a mixed uso :lroa hoying importont residential/offioo/rotail
developmont possibilitios, '.lIJithin ton years publio in'/ostmont noeds to be m~do in
terms of on urban park (porhaps in oonjunotion with a storm\".'i}tor retontion projeot)
which will servo ~s an ~monit..' for antioip:ltocf rosidontial do'/olopmont.
A5SEMBL Y POSSI81L1TIES
In this aro:l, assombly possibilitios ~re quito good given tho rolativoly undorutilizod
devolopmont p~ttorn, with tho oxoeption being tho usos loc~tod along Court Stroot.
Thoro ~ro :l number of underutilizod proportios in this oro~, and somo assembly for
rosidonti~lIoffioo/retail usos is possiblo :lnd should bo oncour~god.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
31
OCTOBER, 1993
"
<,l.
"
., ; ~ "
" :. ~; .. ',\ ~ .. .'~' . " . .".
, , '..';
, ;
., ..~
-:. ::'.:J;
DESIGN ISSUIiS
As mentioned above, this aroa sOP/os as a major entryway into Downtown Cloarwater.
Consequentl..', remedial landscaping along Court and Chostnut Streets is extremely
desiraBlo.
ZONING ISSUES
800ause of tho somowh~t intonso oxisting dovolopment along Court Stroot in this aroa,
Urban Conter (Eastorn Corridor) zoning is rooommendod. This zoning will provide the
floxibility for tho dosired dovelopmont and redovolopmont of this ~roa. Fow
nonconformities will be oroated through this oh:mgo in zoning.
.';
, .,
-:'.1
" -I
:.: .~ I
PRIORITY L^ND USES
Within tho southeast expansion :::Iroa, priority UGOS includo:
~ Rosidontial usos.
~ Offico usos.
. Rotail usos.
As indioatod in tho discussion for priority land uscs for the Eastorn Corrider Distriot,
proporty along tho m~jor thoroughbros through this aroa is most suitablo for rotail
usos. Residential and office uses can be pro'Jidod in locations not diroctl'l fronting on
those thoroughfares.
'.,
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
32
OCTOBER, 1993
; .' ~.~--' _~__ _n_~~ '~'::i~~~_J
"
_'1\
!}.,I.
'...
'.
crry OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN'DEVELOPMENT PLAN
APPENDICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
37
OCTOBER, 1993
:,:",:,','''', c
. ,.' ~. . ,_. .... .
. ,....."
',' 'J~~
.,' ...._, ,~,:":"..:'\.,~~'.i,:; :;':}I,:tkl.{"':L.<"'~ 1:
APPENDIX A
POLICY FOR PUBLIC CONDEMNATION
FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS
In order to facilitate private development of the type promoted within this Downtown Development
Plan, the City of Clearwater recognizes that condemnation oJ private property for these desirable
private uses may be necessary. It is not the objective of the City of Clearwater to interfere with the
functionings of the private real estate market. This Downtown Development Plan, although
appropriately reactive to proposed public development in the Downtown area, is primarily a guide for
the private development and redevelopment of Downtown Clearwater.
However, when a proposed private development that substantially furthers the public goals and
objectives set forth in this plan is unable to proceed due to unrealistic market conditions or unwilling
private sellers, the City Commission may determine that the public interest is served by the utilization
of the public condemnation process to fairly simulate realistic market conditions or to provide a just
means of resolving the conflict between an unwilling seller and the prospective developer.
The process for public condemnation for private developments shall be the same process as for
condemnation for public developments, and shall follow the same relocation procedures for displaced
residents and/or businesses. In addition, the City Commission shall be required to make a formal
finding or determination of public interest in the condemnation, as well as execute a development
agreement with the prospective developer to insure, to the greatest extent possible, that those
components of the proposed development deemed to have a specific public benefit or necessity will
actually be constructed and/or established.
The City of Clearwater considers the use of its condemnation powers, as granted by the State of
Florida, to be a measure of last resort, whether or not the condemnation is for a public or a private
development. However, the City is committed to using these powers in circumstances which have
,been clearly determined to substantially forward the goals and objectives set forth in this Downtown
Development Plan and which meet the criteria for condemnation established herein and in the Florida
Statutes.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
38
OCTOBER, 1993
, i
'.':1
j
,'I
,,',' i
:"1
.....,......"...
"
, ;.',.
. . "
,
','.'r
A-PPE-Nfm{-B
PREVIOUS DOYJNTO'A'N PLI\NS IN SUMMARY PERSPECTIVE
Thoro 'Nero bJGioally threo previous plJns thJt were develeped to Jddress tho issues and oenoerns of
DO'A'ntown CleJPNater. Theso plans includod:
1. The PIJn for Downtown CloJrwJter, Ootobor 1977.
2. Addendum to tho PIJn for Downtown CloarwJtor, Ma', 1, 1986.
3. Clear'.,'ater Community Redevelopment Plan, Novomber 1986.
WH^ T \,\'AS THE PURPOSE OF THE DO'NNTOWN PLAN 7
The Plan for Downtown Clearwator wac first and foremost J statement of City goals, pelicies and
recommendJtions regJrding its futuro phycical gro'Nth. As:m official public document adoptod by the
City Counoil, tho Plan reflocted gonoral oommunity consensus about how, '.vhon, and whero tho oity
&hould oncourage Dmvntown growth and de'.'olopment. Tho Plan for Downtown CleJrwJtor explicitly
communioJted City polioy to tho public and enablod coordination of publio Jnd privJte devolopment
activitios. The Plan provided decision makers 'Nith broad,long rango oontoxt againGt which tho',
can 'Neigh the effects of their decision. ^ vicion of CleJrwater's future Dm!!mtown WJS offerod by the
Plan with various ways that futuro could be approJched.
\'VHY 'J.'AS THE PLAN NEEDED?
Tho Plan for Dmvntewn Clear...vater served as a moans for the CloarwJter community to resolve
uncortainty Jbout tho future Jnd to give the long term perspoctive which would help to determine how
best to propare for :md doal with tho future Downtown issues Jnd problems.
The idoal result ef the Plan was to guide public and private actionG :md investments to produce :m
urban core thJt wOl:lld bo safo, attrJotive :md offioient place in which to livo and work. The city ctrove
to achiovo this by exercising the powerc to tax,
Gpend, and rogulate powers that had boon granted to it by tho Stato. Tho community nooded J frame
of referenco, J written
document of long torm policies for development, against which to meJsure the merits of short term
actions.
I
I
I
I
i
1
j
,'1
,I
" i
WHAT 'NAS THE SCOPE OF THE DO'A.'NTOWN PLAN 7
Two terms oon be usod to describe tho scope of tho Plan for Downtown Clearwater: long range Jnd
comprohonsive. Tho Plan '",as long range in that it doalt with the Downtown's developmont ovor a 8
10 "ear time span. Becauso tho conditions upon which tho Plan was basod wore constJntly chJnging,
tho Plan roquirod periodic monitoring and revision. Howovor, it attempted to look bo\'ond the
immodiate concerns to foreseo and undorstand tho Downtown's future.
Tho Plan 'Nas comprehensivo in that it oncompassod the entire geographio aroa of anticipatod
Downtown jurisdiction and JII typos of physical dovelopment issuoc. Tho goographio oovorago of the
PIJn extended te thoso areas that might be oxpooted to bo served bV oxpansion into Downtown.
Elomonts of physic:lI dovolopmont that tho Downto'Nn Pkm dealt with inoluded tho Community's
natural onvironment, reoreation, transportation, Jnd how the Downtown would expand its services Jnd
facilities to meot futuro noeds.
'1
, 1
'I
,I
,I
;.1
:':\
',1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
39
OcrOBER, 1993
DOl}JNTOWN PLANNING GO.'tLS AND OllJfiCTI'IIiS
The goals :md objeotives of tho Downtown PI:lIl providod tho gonoral fromowork to guide futuro growth
ond dovolopmont of tho Downtown :uea. Their formulation WJS bosod upon diroot input from vorious
st:1koholders includin.g the oommunity, tho DO'Jllntown Pion TJsk Foroo ond tho communit'{ wide
quostionnoiro progFJm. Not only did the goals Jnd objeotives roprosont tho oommunity's consensus,
tho',' also provided the found:1tion upon which tho Pion 'NJS basod.
The planning objoctives contored on three mojor ore;:Js including gonerol devolopment polioy,
tr:msportJtion, and land use.
..
Genoral Development Policy Objectives
1. Rooognizo ;:Jnd build upon tho bosio strengths of the existing Downtown areo.
2. FOClHi -.on improving existing Do'.vntown activity contors :1nd, Gocondorily, on tho
introduction of mJjor ne'N land usos.
3. Establish:1 oompotible relationship between devolopment, natur:11 features ;:Jnd
Glimatologio:ll oonditions.
1. Rooognize significant historic ~md architoctural landm;:Jrks.
*
TronsportatioFl Objectives
6. Make Downtown highly ooccssible from all parts of
the motropoliton aroa.
6. Provido:J &Jfo, officient ond convenient Downtown
vohicular circulation system.
7. Provide podostriJn aocommodotions within Downtown th:lt miniffiire.
pedestrian/vehioular confliGts.
8. Provide convonient Jnd Jttroctivo Downtovvn pJrking fooilities.
9. Previde convenient Jnd sheltered public tronsit stops.
1 O. PrElv-ide for truok deliver't' and servioo thot does not oonflict with pedeetrian ;:Jnd
-vel1iculJr circulJtion.
*
LJnd Use Objectivee
11. Achieve a mix of mutually supportivo lond uses in J compotiblo :lnd funotionJlly
rel;:Jted arr:lIlgomont.
12. Creato a vitol ond attractive. Downtown shopping environment.
13. Premote Downtown as J oanter for govornment, bonking, profossional :md busine&s
sorvioes.
14. ~rE)moto Jddition;:J1 residentbl and hotol\motel occommodJtions.
1 6. Develop reoreation and open spoco opportunitios os 0 cpocial featuro ond ;:Jttraotion
of Do'.'''ntown.
16. Creato a devolopment pJttern which reinforoes oxisting Jctivity oentore and provides
an attractivo interplay of building mossos ond open space.
PAST CHRONOLOGY .~ND MILESTONES OF
CLEARVJATER PREVIOUS DOV'.'NTO\\'N PLANS
* In 1 970:
"Tho Dewntown Developmont Board was formod. The Boord ser'lod os 0 o:1t:Jlyst for
.Qewfitown improvoment by monitoring eoonomic conditions, formulating plan&, ;:Jnd
reoommending Jctions to the City. It& &peoified funotioR& included aotivo partioipation
in the implementation of tho Downtown plans by ostJbli&hing, aoquiring, construoting,
owning, financing, lioensing, oporoting ond mon;:Jging publicly ownod or loosod
fasilitieE) thot wore deomed foosiblo in effeoting implomontation for public purposes.
=T-l:le Board WOE) grJntod ;:J ono mill toxing power to offeot ohango in DowntewR
cond-itkm. Thera "'JS no substantiJI improvoment beoouse of insuffioient ravonue.
* In 1 976:
In s~mmer of this yeor, the City of Cloarwater ond Downtown Dovolopmont Board
took J join dooision to sponsor 0 mJjor down town study. This stud', brought about
the pr-eparation and birth of tho Plan for Downtown Cloorw;:Jter.
* In 1976:
^l3ril 20, of this yoar, RTKL ASSOCIATES, ;:J Boltimore based Jrohitocturol and
planning firm 'NOS oommissioned to prepJro a Plnn for Downtown Cloorwotor.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
40
OCTOBER, 1993
, '
* In 1977:
Tho Plan for Downtown Cl03PA'3tor was adaptod. This PI:m usod 3n oxtonsive publio
input prooedure to plan a multi purpose environmont. It was 3n 3mbitious but
achiovable pl::m closely tied to tho eoonemic realities of tho oommunity. Its ultimato
produGt v.'as to contributo positively to tho ooonomio woll being of tho community,
and to projeot a positive image of Downtown to befit its herit3ge 3S tho ooro of tho
community ,
THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR DOV'JNTO\3JN CUU\R\"JA T&R
Concoptu::1l1y Downtown W3S divided into thFoe 1(0" areas which included:
* In 1981:
* In 1982:
* In 1986:
1.
Doy.'"town Coro .l\r08 west of Myrtle .'\venue 3S a podestrian oriented distriot which
inoludod 3 distinctive retail shopping aroa, J waterfront p~Irk system, a government
conter 3nd new office, residenti31 and hotel/motel faoilities.
The Eastorn Corridor Area (e::1&t of Myrtle Avenuo) was to be improved as an
automobilo orionted commorciJl district. Clevel:md Street 'NaG to Gorvo aG a linear
commerci::lI corridor east of Myrtle ^ '1enuo. 'Nest of Myrtle A venue 'Nas planne6-t&
bypass Cleveland Stroot, 'Nhich would be transformed into a shopping aroa, "'lith a
&ovorel~' limited transport3tion function.
Do\'.'"to\.-,,," Traffio Ciraulation System woe to be improved to minimize pedostrian
vehicul3r cenflicts, increaso accessibility to Dmvntown, and reroute disruptive
through traffio not dostined for downtown.
Clearwater established its Downtown as ::1 redevelopment district, and established a
tax incroment trust fund in 1982.
2.
3.
A Rodevelopment Plan W3S adopted. This Plan oonsisted of the PI::1n for Downtown
Clearw::Iter :md additionJI soctions to cemply with St3te La'.'" thJt required that tax
inore3ses gonerated in redevelopment areas be set aside for implomentation of
redevolopment pl3n. Improvomonts undortJl<on oonsistont with this plan included:
*
stroetscapo improvements on Clovoland Street,
reh::1bilitation of CO::lohman Park and construction of a bandshell;
land 3cquisition and construotion of CloarwJtcr Squ3ro;
construotion of tho P::Irk Stroet transit terminal;
construction of parking garagos on Garden Avonuo ::Ind P~Jrk StfeetT
construction of tho 60 Unit R31ph Richards Apartments.
Rofinement of tho concopts in Tho Plan for Downtown Clo3rv'.'ater necossit3tod tho
commissioning or acceptance of tho Addondum to The Plan fer Downtown
Cloarwater. This study updatod the market and fin3noial anJlysis of tho Plan for
Downtown Clear'.'l/3ter. Appropriato projoots 'Nore recommondod, and zoning,
~ng, strootscapo and tr3ffio issuos were disoussed.
Tho roport oonoludod that Downtown Clear'Nator had tho potontial to rodevolop as 0 rotail
office rosidential hub of modor3to s031e 3nd intonsity. Offico buildings 'A'ore to bo oriontod
to tho Clevoland Stroet frontago. Municipal funotions should be grouped in ::I
civic/recreational complex at tho oastern edgo of tho Downtov:n oore. Promotion of
Downtown and attontion te aosthotic should be encouragod. B3yfrent parks 3nd greon
spaco should bo upgraded. The consultants rooonlmondod additional retail/rostaur3nt uses
to bo dovoleped at the ro3r of Mass 8rothors, and oonvorsion of the Downtown post offioe.
residential usos woro recommendod for the vacant p3rool :1t Groenwood /\'Ionue and L:1urJ
Stroot, and ::It the northwost cornor of Myrtlo Avenue and Piorce Stroot,
*
*
*
*
*
COMMUNITY ATTITUDES ''.NO PERCEPTIONS OF DO\^JNTO\\'N
^ substantial oonsensus of attitudes and opinions about Downtown 1Jl.'3S rovoalod in the t\"I()
community survoy quostionnairo programs conduoted as part of tho pl3nning study. Tho oBsential
conclusions drawn from thoso cemmunity survo',s were:
1. Downtown Clean~:ator has an imago probloml it was perooived as 3 doclining area.
2, OO'.".mtown'G major problems wero ospocially prevalont in the rotail soctor and included a
laok of oonveniont parking, a 130k of patronage, and a laok of invostor confidonce.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
41
I
OCTOBER, 1993
2. Shopping remainod a major Downtown attraction. Tho Downtown retail area's major
strength is Mass Brothors and its majar woakness was in spooialty rotailing. Important
faoters in rovitalizing tho DowntO'.vn rotail sector woro highlightod whioh includod:
a. attracti'/e storos which would havo appoaHRtl
merohandise;
b. improved parking facilities (convenient, amplo,
froo spaoes);
o. a mix of storos which would enablo multiplo purposo shopping within a compaot ::Iroa;
aM-
d. stores offering a high quality of servico.
4. ,he oommunity showed strong concern for tho quality of urban dosign in Downtown.
Improving the extorior appearanoe of buildings was a high priority for Downtown
improvomont. In addition, DO\"mtown's 'Natorfront sotting was soon as tho most important
featuro of Downtown. The rolo of urb~n dosign in properly recognizing tho watorfront as
woll as orasing tho negativo image of Downtown was also soon to bo critical to tho
SUGCOSS of Downto'wn royit~lization.
6. Streng community support existod for cultural o'/onts and activitios in DO't'Vntown as ~
most important 'Nay of improving tho ~ro;].
6. If Downtown's nogativo imago porciGtod, tho community maintained that it oould be
c><pectod that tho curront lovol of Downtown uso and patronago would doteriorate.
+:-. Strong oommunity support oxisted far tho oity to play an aotive rolo in Downto'."m
revitalization including tho provision of inoontivos to ctimul:Jto privato Downtown
redovolopmont.
!
]
'.!
I
'!
REVITALIZATION STR^ TEGY
Tho o'lor~1I revitalization strategy for Downtown Cle:Jr'Nater ovolved in responso to its 1) oxisting
f)rebloms ana opportunitios, 2) planning goals ~nd objectives and 3) markot projoctions of space use.
+ho basic strategy was fourfold:
1 . Artioulation of Two Distinot Dt;n....ntown Distrists
Future developmont dooisions regarding Downtown land use and circulation was to bo basod
upon the rocognition of tho two distinot and funotionallv districts 'Nithin Downtown: tho
Downtown Core Area and tho Eastorn Corridor Aroa. TheBo two :Jroas wore soon to bo
functional and complomontary to one ~nothor.
a. Downtown Core l\rea ~ podestrian oriented, spaco intonsive, mixod uso centr:J1 aroa.
Majer compononts of this ~rea woro tho rotail core aroa, tho govornmont oontor area, major
banking and offico oantors, and tho '.lIatorfront aroa.
b. Eastern Corridor ^rea an ~utomobile orientod, spaoo oxtensivo commerciallJso ::uo. Major
compononts of this ~re:J woro Clovobnd Plaza, the strip oommoroial oorridor areas of
Clovoland Streot and Mvrtlo Avonue, and tho :Jutomobilo servioe centor ~roa.
2. 8-;pass Through Traffio
To facilitato a vital pedestrian oriontod Downtown Core l\roa, it was essential to re route
through tr:Jffic around rather than through the area:
a. State Route 60 RedesignatioR from Clovoland Stroot within the Downtown Core aroa to
Drow Stroot, Court Chostnut Stroets, or any othor moans that would achievo tho objootivo
of a pedostrbn orientod Downtown.
I
I
b. Alternate State Route 19 Redesignation from Fort Harrison to Myrtia A 'Jonuo.
3. FaGu6 on Ko', Prajeet Areas.
AttoRtion was focussod on ko'" projeot Jroas whose impaot :Jnd im:Jge produoing qualitios WOFS
to ha'/o maximum offoot on tho Downto\'vn. Thoso aroas inoludod:
a. The Retail Core Area: Tho rotail oaro aroa :Jlong Cleveland Stroot was identifiod as J
oritical problom are:). Its deolining ooonomic viability and appoaranco roquiro upgrading of
its funotioning and appoarJnco to ~ttraGt moro shoppers.
b. The \"/aterfront 1\rea: The waterfront 'Nas seon to bo the DowntoWfl's major physioal
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
42
OCTOBER, 1993
, i
" ,.'. _\,,;~: " ~"
. "." ~.'.
" I
. ,!',
,"1,. ,"., . . ~ .
-1
"';:;;#
a!)Get. Its potontiol to provido a mojor publio uso attraotion as '....011 as servod os a o:lt:ll'/6t
for Downtown ro\'it:llizatian booou!)o of tho unique opportunities it offorod.
o. Street LandsG8ping and Dewntown Gatewa'/sl ^ Downtewn stroot I:lndscaping and ontr'{
feoture progr:lm would provide a simple, rolatively ine)(ponsive th:lt would not only
be:lutify tho are:l but could olso provido it with :I much neoded Gonse of orrivol and spocial
idontity.
4.
Develop AdElitional Residential, Office Space and Hotel/Motell\ooommodaticns in a Supporti'J9
Manner 88 Market Conditions Impro'.'e.
I
~ i
')
J
:l
,\
'I
,
I
" I
: -' ~
,";;1
:" .~ j
':1
,', ',,:'1
,'./
DiVELOPMENT COSTS AND SCHEDULE
D&VELOPMENT SCHEDULE
Tho Plan for Downtown Cloorwater ont:lilod 36 dO'.vntown dovelopmont projects that were to bo
implemented on a step by step b3Sis over tho poriod of 8 10 ye:.1r period.
In viow of Downtown's doolining im:.1go ond P:lGt failuro!) to est3bli!)h an offectivo on going
rellit:.1liz:ltion program, it 'NOS oSGonti:.11 th:lt tho initial stops of the implement:.1tion schedulo bo gO:lrod
taf '
1 . Basic 3nd aohievable improvements th:lt would serllo to est:.1blish a 'Norkable progr:lm :md
"tr:.1cl< record" of suooess.
2, Domonstration project!) whoso imp30t would serve to 3) symbolize Downtov:n's
re....italization, b) estJblish :.1 positivo im:.1ge that something o)(oiting 'N:.1S happoning to
Downtown ond 0) restore invostors' oonfidence.
::;j
I
,:d
:, ~:"'l
:;,j
The implementation sohodule 03110d for a oomploment:lry progr:lm of public :.1nd priyoto investmonts.
The phosing of tho 36 development projeots wora 3rronged in response to :
CITY OF CLEARWATER ,
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
43
OCTOBER,1993
.. .'
',~ ..;,".:,
.',
,l,...
1. Nocess:lry public systom improvoments te stimubto =:lnd support the long torm DowAtown
development,
2. Forocasted eoonomic market domands for privato developmont and
3. Opportunities to maximizo tho offootivenos& and benofickll impact of improvomonts th-rough
coordinated public and private aotions.
DEVliLOPMIiNT COSTS
Tho total invostmont program in Dm"lntown Cle~rwator over this period was ostimatod to bo
approximatol', $69 million. Approximatoly 14 % of this total invostmont was to come from tho publio
&0ctor, funded by a combination of local, stato, :md fodoral monios.
Summary of tho ostimatod dovelopment oosts is providod as bolow:
1 . Basic improvemont oost ovor the 8 10 yoar period was ostimated at $ 6.9 million.
ApproximJtely 11 % of this amount was to be spont on new Downtown LibraPl, 32 % for
Downtown streots improvemont!> and bOJutification, and 2'1 % for parks and recreation
facilitios.
2. Estimotod total privato investment for tho sarno period WJS $60.'1 million. Appro><imntely 61
% of tho =:lmount was oarmarkod for now Downtown housing, 1 9 % for now DoV'mtown -<Jffiao
spaco, 12 % for now Downtown hotel/motel =:locommodotions, and 8 % for new DowAt{)Wn
retoil spJce.
:3. $4.3 million of the $60.1 million pri'loto investment program 'NOS for additional DowAto'Nn
porl<ing faoilities.
1. In oddition to theGe basic public :md pri'lilto seotor invostments, OO&t estimates w{)re also
provided for a proposed City Count'; govornmont parking structure ond a possiblo publio
marino, both of which vvould be publio sector responsibilities.
FUNDING
Funding to imploment tho Plan for Downtown Clearwater WJS to come from a variety of publj.c and
private seotor sourcos. Thoso sources included:
Federal and State aGsistonoo programs
Locol go'/amment funds
Privoto Capital
Toblo 1.4 attaohod summarizes tho potontial funding sourcos for each of tho 36 projeots for Dowfltown
, revitalization,
*
*
*
D&VIiiLOPM&NT CONTROL GUID&lINliS
Tho City and Downtown Dovelopmont BO:lrd working with pri'Jate onterprise were to pro'Jido tho'
primary moohanism for offectuating tho PI:m. Tho nocoscary devolopment control guidolinos iAvewcd:
PIAN APPROVAL
Tho Plan for Oownto'Nn Cloar'.vater should bo approvod bV the CiW Commission ond Dowrlto'Nfl
Do',olopmont Board to sorlie :IS a publio stJtoment of policy dosign guidolinos for future gro.",th and
development of Downtown.
, "
I
I
I
I
-j
:, 'I
lONING ORDINANCE REVISIONS
Tho Plan providod the basis for the revision of the Downtown zoning. Zoning revisions sho~ld bo
designed to roprosont both the public intorest os well as providing flexibility and inoontivos for privJte
rodevolopment. Guidolines proposed for the rovicion of the zoning ordinance :md mop in regards to
tho Downtown area inoludod:
1 . Land Use the zoning ordinonce =:lnd map revisions should recognize t'NO distinct ar()as, the
Downtown Core Area and tho Eastorn Corridor Area, in regards to their differont 1:l11E:l ~6e
ohoraoter and funotioning.
2. Site Plan Review The prooess of sito plan ravio'l'l to be mandatory for all development within
Downtown, regardless of sizo. Tho sito pl:lA ravie...... process should includo both tho PI3ilning
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
44
OCTOBER, 1993
,,-.$
3.
Commission and tho Dovelopmont BO::lrd. All now proposod dovolopment within tho
Downtown Core :\rea should bo Gubmittod for ::m Urb::ln Design RO'Jio\",.
Densi~' RequiremeRts No specific donsity rostrictions should bo roquirod within tho
Downt~V'm Core Aro:J so ::lS to provido incentivos for dO'leloporG to concontr::lto tho highost
donsitios within this arO::l of Downtown.
~
1.
Parking RequiremeRts P::lrking roquiromonts for cemmorcial dovolopmont within the
Downtown Coro Area should bo rovised downward to moro rO::lGonable st::lndards th::ln
presently roquirod, ospoci::llly for retail usos. ^ rotail SpJCO parking st::lnd::lrd if 1 sp::lce per 200
sq. ft. of gross 10::ls::lblo ::lro::l was p:-oposod. Dovolopors: v/ora to be givon ::In option of
contributing monoy toward ::ldditional public p~lfking f::lcilities in liou of providing their own on
sito or off site p::lrking f::lcilities.
1.
THE PLAN FOR DOWNTOWN CLEARW^ T&R
HO'.'\! 'NAS THE PLAN FOR DO\/vNTO'A'N CLEARWATER ORGANIZED?
The Pbn for Downto'fm Clo::lrw::ltor comprised of four major Socti8fl&.-
SECTION 1:
Providod tho proleguo to tho Pbn ::lnd sot up tho pkmning procoss to guide the
prep::lration of the PI::ln. ^ summar'1 of tho Fin::ll dofinitivo pl::ln W::lS pro,..idod. The
Pbn built upon Downtown's strongths ::lnd at tho &::lmo time tried to remod'; problems
which thro::ltenad its oontinued vit::llity. Tho Final PI::ln envisioned throe m::ljor
dovelopment ::lreas:
.;
i
, ,I
1.
2.
3.
Downtown Core ^re::l
E::lstorn Corridor ^ro::l
DO'.'Vntown Tr::lffic Circul:::Jtion Systom
,
1
I
I
SECTION 2:
In thic Emction discussion W::lG divided into four function::ll c::ltegorios: rogion::ll,
physical, economio ::lnd community ::lttitudos.
Regional Setting
Tho region is m::lrked by ::l number of natur::ll ::lmonitieG ::lnd divorsity of communitios, e::lch with its own
p::lrticul::lr character ::lnd idontity. Tho 10c:)I oconom', h::lG centerod around tourism, rotiroment living,
rot::lil trado and roal ostato dovelopmont :Jnd com~truction. Tourism oentored on CleaflN3tor B03ch is
::l m::ljor faotor in tho 10c::l1 economy. Two m::ljor shopping Gontor&, Cle:)rvo'::lter M::l1I and Countryside
M::III sor'/o tho ::IrO::l. Do....mtown Clo::lrwator tr::lditionally is tho commercial oontor of tho oommunity
but its vit31ity as a commercial centor has sufferod incro::lsingly from ::lgo, fr::lgmented land o'Nnorship
pattorns and competition from modorn rotJil centors 3round tho oity.
Physioal Profile
Tr::ldition::lIl'I, tho intorseotion of Clovol::lnd Stroot and Fort H::IrriGon ^venuo m3rkod tho canter of tho
Downtown 3rO::l. HO'/lovor,::ls tho oommunity h3s grown, the Downtown ::lreJ h::ls Q)(p::lndod, primarily
oaGtw3rd along Clovol:::Jnd Streot. Tho Downto.;.rn stud'l ::lre::! thon oncompnssod Jpproxim::ltely 300
acros of land, oxtonding from tho w::!torfront o::lGtw::!rd some 11 blocks to tho Clevol3nd Plaza 3rO::l.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
45
ocroBER, 1993
tend Use
Downtown Cle~lrwJtor oontJinG J varioty of land usos. In gonoral, commorci::11 ~md rotJiI UGes
prodominJto tho Jroa. Tho gonorJI intensity of IJnd uso is 10'N, with muoh Jroa devotod to trJffio
circulJtion and pJrking. Tho ovorJII land usa p3ttorn of Downtmvn is brokon down into two diGtinct
3rOJS: the Downtown Core Area and the &astern Corridor Area.
Transportation
Vehioular Traffio:
Downtown CleJrwJtor doponds prodomin:mtly on vohicular JOCOSS to move peoplo and goods to 3nd
from the area. MJjor traffio flows on Downtown strcotG arc just pJssing through tho areJ, primarily
to and from the bOJoh.
Tho hOJ'Iiost trJffic in the JrOJ is carried b'l Memorial Causeway. Avorago daily trJffic volumo in 1973
WJS higher thJn 26,000. Tho noxt most hOJvily used trJffic VI.';]',' is Clovoland Street, vlith 3bout
23,000 vohiclos 3 dJ't'. ApproximJtely 80 % of tho vohioles hJve both origin 3nd dostinJtion outsiae
of Downto'Nn. Most of the tr3ffic is boaoh oriented through traffic which haG a disruptive offoot on
podostri:m shopping within tho rot3il 3reJ. Drew Street 31so oporJtes ::!s 3n 0:1st '.'Vost Downtown
b'lPJSS route. North south through traffio movos mJinly on Fort Harrison and Myrtle ^'./enue,
Publio Transportation:
Downtown Cl03rwater is served by the Contral Pin011Js Transit l\uthority. By 1 977, 1 6 routes 03rriod
3n ::!vor3go of 186,000 ridors por month. About 4'1 % of 311 ridors 'Noro 62 yo::m:; of Jgo or oldor. Fow
workors rode buses, pOJk hour tr::!ffio 'Nas nO::1r1y ::111 ::!utomobile orientod. The principJI bus stop was
3t the 1::I'(0'/8r st3tion off Park Street, betwoen Gardan 3nd Fort Harrison ^'Jenues.
I
!
, !
PaFkiAgT
Surfaoe p3rking late wore m::Jjor oonsumor of DO'Nntown 13nd. The Downtown stud'l 3rea contJined
3 tot31 of 3pproxim3toly 6,872 p3rking spaoes of '.vhich 6,318 \".'ore good SUrf3CO qU3lity spaoos not
3110ttod to residonti31 uses. In terms of number, Downtown Cloar'A'3tor JppeJred to have 3n abundanco
of parking. Howo,-'or, tho princip::!1 probloms with Downtovm parking inoluded poor '/isibility :1nd
signing to direct pooplo to thorn 3nd In ineffeoth'e 3nd disorgJnized distribution of fJoilitios.
Building Stoak
Building Condition and I\ge:
Tho mJjority of building& in Dmvnto'lln were those built sinoo 1946 inoluding JII of tho commoroial
dovolopmont along Clovobnd Stroot east of Greenwood ,^, venuo. Tho ooro 3rOJ oontoinod most of both
the oldost bl:Jilding stook JS 'Nell 3& major new buildings within DowntmrJn ar03. The oldost buildings
tondod to bo conoentr3ted around the intorsootion of ClevelJnd Jnd Fort H3rrison, historic311y tho
cross rOJds of Downtown.
Historioal Signifioant ArohiteGtural landmarks:
DO'Nntown Cle3rw3tor contains sevorJI buildings with historioal note......orthy Jrohitocturo, 311 looated
within tho Downtown Core aroa. Most notable is the Post Offico, looated at Clovoland Jnd EJst
/\\'onue. Othor 13ndm3rk buildings includo C3lvar." 8aptist Church, PO:lOO Momori::11 Church, tho old
County Court House and tho M3ry Brown Shop.
I
i
I
I
THE PLANNING PROCESS FOR THE DOWNTO'.!'JN Pl.J\N
This W3S 3 stratogic pl3nning prooess to help idontify the problems 3nd opportunities for dovelopmont
in DO'tmtovm CloJrwator. Tho prim::!ry principle underl."ing the pl3nning proooss W3S to Jssuro tl10
oroJtion of 3 plJn bro3d in porspootives, economioally viablo 3nd sensitivo to its o\'or~1I sotting,
BJsic311y thoso proooptG wero gomod towards tho p3rticipJtion of four mJjor pla\'ors not3bly:
1. Community in'.'olvomont within the procoss.
2. Collaboration botwoon public offioials, business 3nd civio le::1dorship.
d. !\dvioo from indepondont outside expertise.
'1. Open, stop bV &top publio polioy deoision making,
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
46
OCTOBER, 1993
\ 1. .
, ,
, ~
, ,,',\"
'.{.,1
PURPOSE:
Thoro 'NOro two ossential purposos.
1. To oreato long r~ngo developmont plan that 'Nould provide gonoral policios =:Ind guidolinos
for both publio :md pri'l~tCl sootors involvomont in tho impro"Jement of Downtown.
2. To initiato ongoing prOOOSE: of public ::md pri..,=:Ito sootor collaboration within tho oommunity
that would promoto public p=:lrticip=:ltion =:Ind involvoment.
THE PL1\NNING PROGRAM
Tho pbnning program oontored around fivo major stops oach with definitive plan of aotion. Spooifically
, thoy includod:
j) Reoonnaissance by tho Dosign Toam to identify key issues and paramotors affocting tho
futuro of Downtown. Opportunitie& and constraints upon Do"."mtown
revitaliz=:Ition were idontifiod in regards to oommunity attitudes and
loadorship, tho natur:11 setting, bnd use and oiroulation, building
conditione, market trends and utility support capabilitios.
ii) Goals. Objeoti\'es and Strategies:
This section of tho pbnning program provided tho gonor~1
fr:1mO'.'Vork and fundament=:ll planning goals to guido future
growth and devolopmont of tho Downto\",n area. ^ sot of five
gO:1ls and sixtoen objoctives woro adopted to diroct tho
formulation of tho PI:ln. Thoso fund-ament:11 goals focussed on
fivo goneral are~s:
i
1. Funotional Role Gearod towards strengthoning Downtown Cle::uwater as J multi uso contor
that would ~ttract and corvo the peoplo of tho Cloarv..ator aroa.
2.
Regional Context Emphasis Strengthen Downtown as a unique plaoo within tho T:1mpJ Bay
Rogion.
3. Community Role Strongthon Downtown Clearwater's contribution to the general well being
of tho community.
, I
I
4. General En~ironmental Charaoter Improvo tho physioal imago of Downtewn Clearwater.
6. Implementation Strategy Enablo rovitJlization of Downto'Nn Cloary'.'ator to bo a suocossful
and on going rO::llit'{.
SPACE US~ PROGRAM
Tho Plan for Downtown Clearwator V'..~s b::lsod upon ::I o::lroful ::Inalysis of markot fOJsibilit)' study for
attr::lcting and acoommodating v:1rious potontial USO&. \^Jith tho market study it was possiblo to
ostimate tho soalo :::md timing of residential, office, rotail and transiont aGcommodation development
activity v'Ihioh could occur 'tlithin DO'."Jntown Cloarw::Itor by 1986. The&o ostimates 'Noro basod solely
on m::lrket support oapabilitios r:::lthor th::ln physical dovolopment oap::lbilitios within Downtown.
RETAil
Gi".'on tho past ::Ind prosent conditions of Cloarw::Itor' s retail ooonomy, new ret~i1 developmont within
Dov:ntown was Goon to ooour, or oauso to ocour, only undor cortain circumstances with prudonce and
caro in tho procoss. Now rot~i1 ::Icti'Jity could bo promotod by:
~ Tho roplaoomont of oxisting storos, with now morchants offering goods or sorviGoG
difforont from those now furnishod.
2. Tho reloGation of stores both within the CBD ::Ind, mora importantl'" from poriphor:::ll arOJs.
3. Tho identification of ::I spocialt'{ shopping trade not nO'1/ ser'/ad by tho rogion' s oxisting
complemont of stores. For eX::lmplo, this could inolude inoxponsivo merchJndiso keyed to
a limited incomo retiremont customer or specialized serviGos dosirod b't' the gonor~1
population but not no';, :1'1ailablo in tho ::Iroa's existing pl::lnned shopping (lOntors.
4. Inoreasod tourists pJtronage, p::lrticulJrly for spooialty shops and food Jnd bo,,'or::lge
ostablishmonts.
5. Othor typos of stores :1nd shops which offorod spoci::ll morch:::lndiso or sorvioes that ..",ould
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
47
OCTOBER, 1993
", ?' . , ."i.... ; . '.,
{. '
; I~.' \'
bo supportable in a contr::ll location to tho ontiro region as that rogion (e.g. northorn
Pinell3s and 6outhorn Pasoo Counties) experienoes futuro population gro'J'Ith.
PROBLEMS ^ND CONSTRAIN-TS
Problems and oonstr::lint6 upon Downtown Cle:lrwator woro idoRtified in rog::lrds to :
1 . Community !\ttitudes :lnd Leadorchip
2. Tho Natur::ll Sotting
3. Land Uso :lnd Circulation
4. 8uilding Conditions
6. M::lrkot Tronds ,
6. Utility Support C3p3bilities
Collocti'/oly thoso probloms 3nd constr3ints woro viowod 36 liabilities whose nogati'.'o imp:lots \OJora
to bo dO::llt '.\\Jith accordingly. Those constraints includod: '
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1\ Doclining Im::lgo
^ Gonor::ll L30k of Activity
An unattrootive Ovoroll Appear3nco and Idontiw
Disruptive Through Troffio
Competition from No,,'! Suburb:ln Shopping M311s
Inoonveniont Rot3il Parldng
/\ Lack of Pedostrion AA1onitios
Neg::ltive Communit'{ Attitudes
^ Laok of Investor Confidonoo
A Laok of Coordin::ltod Public and Priv::Ito Leadorship
DO\"lNTO\^JN'S STRENGTHS I\ND ASSETS
I
I
,D06pito numorous oonstr3ints assooi:ltod with Downtown Clearwator, 311 was not bad in Downtown.,
It has its strongths and w03knoss06 3S woll as its assots ::lnd li3Dilitios. Its :lSSOt6 aotod as tho pulling
foroes for the revitaliz::Ition offorts. Its major OGsots ::Iro summa...izod bolow:
1. A Strategio Loo::ltion in relationship to area touri6m :md uppor income m3rkot aro::lS.
2. An Attractivo Naturol Sotting pro'.'idod by it6 'oV3torfront loo3tion, tho ba't'front bluff ::Ind tho
pockots of maturo Iivo oak trooe: 3nd donse landsc3ping.
3. A Safo and Cle::ln EnvironmontVYhich is rol3tivoly froo of tho sooial and on'/ironmont31 probloms
whioh ploguo mon'( oitios today.
4. ^ Strong oxisting Boso including oity and county govornmont oontorE, bonking and fin::mokll
institutions, MO::1s Brothors Dopartmont Store and major ohurohes.
5. ^ Numbor of ArohitoGturall)' Notoworthy Buildings both old ::lnd no'J'.'.
6. 1\ St::lble Downtown Fringo Aroa '....ith attraotive rosidential noighborhoods.
7. Existing Downte'lo'n Property Owners and Merchants Organizations.
8, Goner;]1 Modi3 Undorstanding and Support of Do'nnto'.Im rovitaliz3tion.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
48
OCTOBER, 1993
.'. , r,'
.,: I
. ,.' ,", -
, I!.'
, ,
, . ,"
"
. .
'..' ..
~. '.1
, ,
",
APPENDIX B 9
REVISED URBAN CENTER ZONING DISTRICT
I
NO MAJOR CHANGES TO THIS APPENDIX
SEE AGENDA ITEM FOR MOTIONS TO AMEND
URBAN CENTER ORDINANCE ATTACHED SEPARATELY
....'1
..' ..
'"
.. -.{
J
1
I
'I
I
,-I
, I
, !
"j
i
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
, I
69
OCTOBER, 1993
.tt",~ .
}:'.'. .:
IMPLEMENTATION ACTION
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENTS REVISING
ZONING DISTRICTS TO
IMPLEMENT PLAN
ZONING ATLAS AND LAND
USE PLAN AMENDMENTS TO
IMPLEMENT PLAN
SPECI/\L TR.'\NSPORT/\ TION
AREA DESIGNATION
URBAN PARKS
LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR
DOWNTOWN ENTRYWA YS
REZONING STUDY FOR N.
MYRTLE AVENUE AREA
DESIGN AND ZONING STUDY
FOR N. FORT HARRISON
AVENUE
CLOSURE OF DREW STREET
SIGN REGULATION
REVISION/DESIGN AND
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC
SIGNS
USE OF PUBLIC R-O-W FOR
SIDEWALK CAFES, RETAIL
SALES, ETC.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN .
APPENDIX ce
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES AND SCHEDULE
REVISED URBAN CENTER E.I\STERN COR~IDOR DiSTRICTS.
OCTOBER~, 1993.
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE CITY BOARDS. FIRST READING OF
ORDINANCES. FEBRUARY, 1993.
B. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION (PPC, TBRPC, DCA).
SPRING/SUMMER, 1993.
C. PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION. SECOND
READING OF ORDINANCES. OCTOBERJUL Y, 1993.
^. PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE CITY BO^RDS. SUMMER, 1993.
B. COORDIN.^.TION WITH FDOT, TBRPC, DCl\, FALL, 1993.
A. REVISION TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ELEMENT) AND PARK DEVELOPMENT PLAN. PUBLIC HEARINGS
BEFORE CITY BOARDS. FY 94-95 AUGUST, 1993.
B. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION (TBRPC, DCA) AND
FINAL ADOPTION BY DECEMBER, 19941993.
A PRIORITY SCHEDULE WILL BE DEVELOPED, WITH A MULTIYEAR
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM, FOR BUDGETARY CONSIDERATION
IN FY 94/9593/94.
STUDY COMPLETED; SECOND READING BY COMMISSION IN
SEPTEMBERJ~, 1993.
STUDY COORDINATED WITH N. MYRTLE AVENUE REZONING
STUDY.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING GROUP TO COORDINATE ALTERNATIVES
WITH FOOT AND MPO; PROJECT TO BE COMPONENT OF DREW
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT INITIATED IN 1993.
A. REVISION OF CITYWIDE SIGN REGULATIONS OCCURRED IN
1992.
B. A SIGNAGE DESIGN TEAM CONTAINING REPRESENTATIVES
FROM PLANNING, PARKS & RECREATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
SHOULD BE FORMED TO DEVELOP IMPROVED PUBLIC SIGNAGE
PROPOSALS FOR CONSIDERATION WITH AN INITIAL
PRESENTATION IN SPRING, 1994FALL, 1993.
PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING GROUP TO COORDINATE
WITH FDOT; PROJECT TO BE INITIATED IN WINTERS PRING OF
1993.
70
ocrOBER, 1993
APPENDIX DE
GENERALIZED FINANCIAL PLAN
The Downtown Development Plan is intended to be a redevelopment plan driven and primarilv funded
bv the private sector. This is reflected in the Plan's concentration on priority land uses for the three
Downtown districts. It is these projects that will alleviate the depressed economic and structural
conditions that blioht Downtown Clearwater. These proiects cannot be auantified at the present time
since there are no specificproiects under consideration bv the Communitv Redevelooment Aoencv.
However. as the followino tables indicate, there is sufficient revenue from the tax increment fund to
allow public participation in selected private priority proiects, oiven anticioated revenues above existino
bond debt service.
The Plan also contemplates a number of specific landscaping and park development proposals for the
expenditure of Community Redevelopment Agency funds within Downtown Clearwater. These specific
proposals can be quantified in terms of cost and are described below. Two additional tables are
included which indicate the revenues received by the CRA and the major expenditures of the eRA since
its inception.
URBAN PARK DEVELOPMENT
PARK LOCATION
ESTIMATED LAND
ACQUISITION COSTS
$175,000
ESTIMATED PARK
DEVELOPMENT COSTS
$125,000
SOUTHERN CORE
REMEDIAL STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPING
STREET NO. LANDSCAPED COST
ISLANDS REQUIRED
CLEVELAN D STR EET 260 $130,000
COURT STREET 220 110,000
CHESTNUT STREET 180 90,000
FT. HARRISON AVENUE 132 66,000
MYRTLE AVENUE 132 66,000
GREENWOOD A VENUE 112 56,000
MISSOURI A VENUE 110 55,000
TOTAL 1 , 146 $573,000
The total cost associated with these improvements is $1,098,000, which represents only
approximately 127% of the annual income taken in by the CRA during 1991. It is clear that sufficient
funds will be available to accomplish the projects specified in the plan for which cost figures can be
estimated.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
71
OCTOBER, 1993
.
.. ...,,~
As oreviouslv mentioned. t+here are also general expenditure proposals included within the plan which
cannot be so quantified. Such proposals include:
~ CRA participation in the private development of priority land uses for the various
districts established in the plan.
~ Mass transit improvements linking Downtown Clearwater with Clearwater Beach and
with major employment bases.
~ Downtown Clearwater "spurs" from the Pinellas Trail.
~ Removal of the Drew Street pavement linking Coachman Park to Clearwater Harbor.
Because it is not possible to accurately measure or estimate the ultimate cost of these projects, no
specific cost data has been included. Once specific cost figures are developed, each project will be
analyzed on a case-by-case basis in terms of its funding potential and overall contribution to the plan.
Many of the projects also have potential separate funding sources, such as the Drew Street project
(which can be funded through the "Penny for Pinellas" fund as a modification to the Drew Street
widening project already so funded) or the mass transit improvements (which may be able to be
accommodated by simple adjustments to existing PST A routes or partially funded through developer
contributions exacted when trolley stop locations are planned).
The above projects will have to be analyzed in terms of the following criteria prior to funding:
, 'I
~ IS THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE ESTABLISHED PURPOSE AND CHARTER
STATEMENTS OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN?
~ IS THE PROJECT SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS A PROJECT OR A PRIORITY LAND USE?
~ IF THE PROJECT IS A PUBLIC/PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, DOES IT DIRECTLY
INVOLVE OR DIRECTLY CONTRIBUTE TO A SPECIFIC PRIORITY LAND USE
ESTABLISHED FOR THE APPLICABLE DISTRICT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT PLAN?
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
72
OCTOBER,1993
, ....!'
,>
- . '.
'. '. 1 ~ :," ,..., q.... <;: \.~ ,!"..','i
."'<,' - !
.i
EXISTING BOND DEBT SERVICE LEVELS
- CITY OF CLEARWATER eRA FUND - I
YEAR BOND DEBT SERVICE COMMITMENTS I
1993 $318,370
1994 $319,015
1995 $318,390
1996 $317,030
1997 $319,495
1998 $140,405
1999 $255,080
2000 $254,353
2001 $257,450
2002 $254,350
2003 $255, 113
2004 $254,600
2005 $252,813
2006 $249,750
2007 $250,200
.' \
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
73
OCTOBER,1993
"
.' " } \
,
, ,
,',
;
,;.
,I;.
.,
,
",' ,
,--,,', ".
.,
'; :-1
.J;
.)
:' :.'
,I'
,........ ,-
.,.. ..,~.. :.l.
'o::t 0 U) 'It' 0 ,... (\j N
..J (0 CO .- .- C") .... 0 N
c:( '" ('I), CO .- ,... N C") '"
I- c-I . cO oi c-i fII'
('I) en
0 C) v ('I) .- " co fII
I- ~ <7t ('I) .- 0) C") <0
..... .... c.) tIJ'
U) v ('I) en '"
'" I"- ('I) to III
~I CO ll) 00 00 '"
al cD c-I N N"
(0 CD en (") <0
C") ('I) tIJ
ml CO N f'o 00 0 III
..... CD ltl (") C") 0
C) 0) .- 'It' " N
ci .; . .; C")' r-:
('I)
'" ll) 00 .- Ul ,...
C") ('I) ... en
~I 'o::t ('I) 'o::t (") 0 ll) en
C) N CO to 0 ~
00 CD '" 00 0 ':
cO a) en en ui '"
LO ll) '" .- (\j ~
C") ('I)
r.! 0 .... en 0 .... '"
11II ~I ..... ll) ('I) LO .... <0
IP LO l"- e LO ~
>- ,...: N LO 0 III
D ('I) ('I) 'o::t N fII
... C") ('I) ,...
m
u: >
>-"C -a 'o::t N '" 0 0 0) ~
u,a m 'o::t V 00 LO 0 Ul
- ~I ..... l"- e LO 0 co '"'
2 fi co
u cO .; ~ ro 0 ,
LU ._ ~ ... ,...
c."C C") V .- .- co tIJ
<,5 ..5 C"l N ~
.... a.. .c '"'
u
20 co
LU- LU C<l
:E rn - ~I (0 ll) 'o::t v N
IP 0 U) N U) '<t" .q- N
Q,. a.. LO I"- ('"I IX:!. co 0
CJ3 c ci cD 0 ti
... .- M en
LU "C C"l I"- 0 0 . .
itr: ... ..... .... (\j III
m
(liS .,CI c-i N"
E
m
ClC -
ClC"C Co C"l .... ('I) 0 <0
OJ ~I ..... 0) .- 0 '"'
LUr: CI) 'o::t CD, ~ 0 ~
.... 11II CD cO 0
cern c ('I) en '"
~! ~ 'o::t ll) .- 0) '"
c f'o en
ClCr: LU
ceIP ...
&&.I> m
...IP
u ClC ' > ~I fII
- ~ 00 I"- 00
0 '" ll) en fII
'o::t Cl:!. '" '"
... en cO ~ 0
r: u: co
Gl C"l N <0
E
J!l
s ~I
en "- ('I) 0 .... '"
'" ~ '" 0 N
C) .- N tIJ
M u> en'
C"l N ~
1Il
Q)
.(,)
..
:l III
o Q)
(f) :l
Olc
,S ~
(,) Gl
cO:
~ "C
.- Gl
': E
Q) Gl
of (;
01:
~ )(
c III
III I-
1Il
Q)
:l
C
Gl
::-
Gl
cc
", ,'.,
j
/3.4
. .!2
. ~".~
. .J:1<
o
~'.~
~Q
~ ~.
C..lo.
~.~
C..l8
-,*'
CI)
...
c
G)
E
...
CI)
OJ
:>
c
c
o
CI)
Cl
c
'2
"-
co
w
CD
E
o
o
c
to
to
CD
C
"'C
III
.....
..0
III
'"tl
C
f3
;:)
2
w
~
a:
-I
~
o
I-
...
Gl
to
;:
..
(tI
Gl
(3
>
...
C
::J
o
U
CI)
~
a;
c
0::
G)
E
o
t)
c
ii
...
c
G)
0::
'"tl
C
III
...J
...
o
CD
(ij
Ul
....
o
~
o
(/)
Q)
:l
C
Q)
>
Q)
r:r:
...
Q)
.r.
o
...
o
CI)
'"tl
ell
Gl
o
o
..
Q.
...
Q)
.c
<J
o
.\
{
)
.~:
"
.-j,
/;
j
t
>
U~
2co
w CI) en
"Een
c:( ~....
o a-
I- ... as
2 0.:-
w.5-
c:::"Oas
-=c(,)
0. ca.!!l
o >~
..JcaC)
w~~
>='0
wO...
C-.c:
cat-
w.~ c
a: 0. 0
ca._
>0.....
I-'+-g.
-0(,)
2 (1).5
::)"SE
~'Co
c::: CI) a-
-='5LL
OU)
CJ
i
..;
J
t
.
~
C'J " 0 " co 0 0 co
m CD L!) N L!) .-- 0 0 ,..... "
co C") 0 L!) " .-- 0 CD 0 ~ ~ 0 I" 0 0 q
I- co 0 0 .- 0 N 0 ex)
m .. , ('i) 0 0 CD L!) d 0'>
CJ) , C") .- .. 0 0 , 0 en LO
m co ~ .-- ('i) " C'J ,..... 0'>
0 en 0 LO L!) " N 0 LO
0 N co N N .- ~ .- C'? N C"') N ":.
u , , .-- ~
.- .....
.(I)- .(f).
,~
c:
c:
0>
....
+-'
c:
o
...
.....
>
ro
OJ
ro
I
>
,~
U
.....
o
+-'
tJ)
0>
~
ro
0>
...
ro
o
c:
:s2
...
ro
0.
o
c:
"0
:J
U
c:
.
tJ)
.:::L.
...
ro
0.
c:
~
o
+-'
c:
~
o
"0
.....
o
C:.:::L.
o ...
'.j:i ro
roo.
.g lij
'.j:i E
:J.c
ro u
0> ro
.0 0
"OU
c:
ro"C
c: c:
o ro
'.j:i X
ro 0>
>0.
g E
0> 0
a:U
0>
>
<f:
c:
Q)
"C
...
ro
<9
.....
o
...
Q)
c:
...
o
U
w
(/)
X'
Q)
0.
E
o
()
Q)
...
ro
:J
0'
(/)
...
Q)
....
ro
~
...
ro
Q)
U
..;-
u
Q)
'0
...
0.
ro
'0
c:
ro
c:
u:
~
...,
...
o
.....
t....
Q) Q)
0.Q)
e ~
o.(/)
....."0
o c:
c:~
o Q)
'.j:i >
'ii) ~
'5 U
0'''0
() c:
<( ro
en
Q)
(.)
ea
0.
en
0)
c:
~
...
ea
0.
(.)
.0
:J
0.
L!)
en
.--
.c
+-'
'~
Q)
0)
ea
...
ea
0)
0)
c
~
'-
ea
0..
+-'
Q)
Q)
....
......
(/)
.:::L.
....
ea
0..
......
o
c
o
'P
(.)
:J
....
......
en
c
o
U
......
Q)
Q)
....
....
(/)
.:::L.
....
ea
0..
"C
C
C'O
Q)
:J
c:
Q)
>
<(
Q)
1::
>-
2
+--"
Q)
Q)
"-
......
(/)
Q)
(.)
"-
Q)
ii:
Q)
:J
c:
Q)
>
<(
....
CI)
C'O
W
>-
.0
"C
Q)
'C
c:
:J
o
.0
>-
1::
Q)
e.
o
....
e.
Q)
"-
o
C)
iii
......
o
c:
o
:E
,~
:J
C'
U
<(
~
en
>
ro
~
.:::L.
ea
~
.:::L.
U
'\:
.0
,
c
o
'.j:i
ea
u
!E
"0
o
E
c
ea
...
...
0>
+-'
o
C
"0
:J
U
C
C
o
'.j:i
ea
>
o
C.
0>
...
Q)
0)
C'O
"-
ea
C)
0)
c:
~
....
ea
0..
......
Q)
Q)
....
......
(/)
.:::L.
"-
co
0..
.....
o
Cl
c:
'5.
C'O
u
CI)
'0
c:
C'O
....I
0>
>
'Ci)
t:
0>
+-'
X
0>
I
tJ) g
+-' ,-
C+-'
0> ro
E ,SoD
0> t:
> '-
e~
atJ)
Ern
- '\:
.:::L. 0>
... +-'
ro ro
a. E
c 0>
ro 0.
E ro
.c u
U tJ)
ea"O
o c:
U~
o
o
co
~
o
o
LO
....
o
.....
en
"0
...
ro
:J
0)
"0
C
ea
tJ)
0>
......
co
...
Cl
0>
0>
...
......
~
(.)
'\:
.0
0>
>
'+:i
co
"-
o
(.)
0>
"C
,
en
0>
0>
"-
......
.:::L.
co
o
......
(,)
0>
'--'
o
'-
a.
c:
o
'+:i
ro
(,)
'+=
'+:i
:J
co
0>
OJ
......
0> tJ)
O>.:::L.
P (,)
en..2
"0.0
co
~o
0>"
>
~"O
U lij
c:
o
'f
o
0.
<t
a:
U
+-'
()
Q)
'0
...
0.
Q3
.c
tJ)
"C
c:
ro
OJ
.:::L.
...
ro
0.
c:
ro
E
.c
U
ro
o
U
"C
c:
ro
Q)
>
Q)
U
o
co
.-
.-
Q)
....
'ii)
CD
c:
"C
:J
OJ
<f:
....
w
U
.....
o
c:
o
',p
'ii)
:J
tT
()
<f:
tJ)
Q)
...
:J
~
\j::
o
c:
',p
.c
CD
~
o
0.
0.
E
ro
0.,
:J
0'
'.j:i
c:
ro
.....
U
Q)
'0
...
0-
~
ro
~
Q)
"C
U5
c:
~
o
.....
c:
~
o
o
tJ)
~
U
..Q
.0
o
o
"
.c
o
:J
o
'-
.c
.....
o
o
~
tJ)
Q)
Q)
....
.....
,
tJ)
...
Q)
.....
c:
ea
0.
~
(.)
'\:
.0
Q)
>
'P
ea
....
o
(,)
Q)
"C
.....
()
0>
'0'
...
0..
Q)
0.
ea
()
tJ)
+-'
0>
Q)
....
.....
(/)
c:
~
o
.....
c:
~
o
o
.....
Q)
Q)
...
.....
(/)
"C
c:
ro
Q)
>
0>
U
CD
c:
o
co
>
ro
0.
tJ)
"C
tJ)
ro
E
.....
tJ)
'L:
.c
U
Q)
.c
.....
.....
c
0>
E
0)
:J
ro
o
.....
tJ)
.....
c:
Q)
E
Q)
>
o
...
0.
E
ro
()
'\:
.....
()
Q)
jjj
c:
~
o
.....
c:
~
o
o
Q)
....
'en
+-'
u
Q)
'6'
.....
e.
.-
(/)
<(
:2
CI)
.....
Q)
~
o
I-
.....
Q)
+-'
C'O
~
.....
C'O
Q)
U
'+-
o
c:
o
''+:;
'en
:J
C'
U
<(
o
C
"0
:J
OJ
tJ)
...
0>
~
o
I-
...
0>
......
co
~
"-
co
0>
U
~
0>
c:
o
......
......
c:
0>
(,)
co
:0
co
.:::L.
...
ro
0.
c:
E
......
0>
0>
...
......
en
"'0
c:
~
0>
>
0>
U
.....
o
......
c:
0>
E
0.
o
Q)
>
0>
o
C'l
0\
0\
-
ri
\.1.1
!:Q
o
t;
o
....I
<(
~
o
I-
In
t-
>
ro
~
...
0>
"0
c:
:J
c:
o
:-e
tJ)
:J
0'
(.)
co
"'0
c:
co
....I
~
a:
!2
\.1.1
~~
\.1.10
~[ij
~~
~~
u~
1J..0
o!2
b~
uS
z
o
i=
u
<t
~
j
i~
.'
~
:~
;~~
if.
t
.;{
';}
'~
I
j
I
i
I
.~
.!
~
!i
Ii
"
~
"
'\
,
'~
;1.
'"
~
"
'~
'i
fi
~
~
(>
1
~~
.,'
~
:\
~
APPENDIX E
PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE REGULATIONS
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE; CREATING DIVISION 14 OF CHAPTER 41 . CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO
PROVIDE FOR REGULATION OF PARKING GARAGES; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; ESTABLISHING
DIMENSIONAL AND NUMERICAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA:
Section 1. Chapter 41 , Code of Ordinances, is amended bv the creation of Division 14, consistino of
Sections 41.251 throuQh 41.252, inclusive, to read:
DIVISION 14, PARKING GARAGES.
Sec. 41.251. Definitions,
The followino words, terms, and phrases, when used in this division, shall have the meaninos ascribed to
them in this section. except where the context clearly indicates a different meaninQ:
"Automatic ticket dispensino entry" shall mean an entry into a parkinn QaraQe controlled by a machine
dispensinQ tickets for oaraQe use.
"Free flow entrv" shall mean an entry into a parkinQ QaraQe without controls, such as attendants, or
automatic or manual ticket dispensino controls,
"Manual ticket dispensino entry" shall mean an entry into a parkinQ QaraQe controlled bv a person manuallv
dispensinQ tickets for oaraQe use.
"Parkin!:) oaraoe" shall mean an above Qround or below around multi-level parkinQ structure.
"Pedestrian-oriented zonino district" shall mean the Resort Commercial Districts on Clearwater Beach, the
Beach Commercial District and the Bavfront, Core and Eastern Corridor subdistricts of the Urban Center District,
"Piaovbackino" shall mean a parkino stall desian in which one vehicle parks behind another from a sinole
travel aisle access point.
"Valet parkino oaraae" shall mean a parkinQ QaraQe where each vehicle is parked bv an attendant.
Sec. 41.252. Dimensional and numerical development requirements,
The followino dimensional and numerical requirements shall applv to the development of parkino aaraoes:
(1) Minimum setbacks. Parkino aaraoes shall have the followinQ minimum setbacks:
.@l From a street rioht-of-wav:
1:. For parkino oaraQes located in pedestrian-oriented zonino districts. the minimum setback from a street
rioht-of-wav shall be 10 feet if the street is classified as an arterial or collector street on the thorouohfare
plan, and five feet if the street is otherwise classified on the thorouohfare plan,
b
For parkino oaraQes not located in pedestrian-oriented zoninQ districts, the minimum setback from a street
rioht-of-wav shall be the same as for other structures in the zoninQ district in which the parkino oaraoe
is located.
iQl
From side and rear propertv lines: The minimum setback from side and rear propertv lines shall be the
same as for other structures in the zoninQ district in which the parkinQ oaraoe is located.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
76
OcrOBER, 1993
;, (6)
"
'.
'1
.~
i (7)
'1
(8)
li!l
1Ql
1m
191
'i
,
,
'~
"
<I
,{2) Maximum heiaht. The maximum heioht for oarkina garaQes shall be the same as for other structures in the
zonina district in which the parkino Qaraae is located.
(3) Minimum open space: None.
(4) Maximum floor area ratio: None.
(5) Maximum buildina coveraQe: None.
Minimum parkino stall dimensions: As specified in section 42.34(4), pesiQn standards.
Minimum travel aisle width: As specified in section 42,34(4), design standards,
Minimum vehicle storaoe requirements at entry points:
For free flow entries: One space per entry lane,
For automatic ticket dispensinQ entries: Two spaces per entrv lane.
For manual ticket dispensinQ entries: Eight spaces per entry lane.
For valet parkina garages: 10 per cent of that portion of the parkino oaraoe parkina capacity served bv
the entry lane, or as otherwise specified by the traffic engineer,
(9) Minimum landscapino reauirements:
li!l Perimeter landscape standards. The perimeter landscape standards of section 42.27(3) shall be met.
1Ql Interior landscape standards: None.
1m Other landscape standards. All other landscape standards of section 42,27 shall be met.
( 10) Ground floor commercial or office component. For parkino oaraoes located in pedestrian-oriented zoning
districts, not less than 50 per cent of the linear width of the parkina oaraae as measured alono any abuttina street
riaht-of-wav shall be devoted to commercial or office development on the around floor level onlv. Such
commercial development shall not be used in computinQ the total floor area allowed for the property on which the
parkino oaraoe is located.
(11) PiQovbackina. For nonvalet parkino oaraoes constructed to meet the parkino requirements for residential
uses, piOQvbackino shall be permitted when each pair of piQovbacked spaces is reserved for an individual
residential unit. For valet oarkino garages, pioQvbackinQ shall not be permitted to be used for required parkinll for
nonresidential uses unless a separate desiQn is submitted showino how the garage could be converted to meet
the parkin 0 reauirements with a standard (i.e., nonpiQovbacked) parkino space arrangement in the event the valet
parkino is discontinued. This reauirement may be waived for parkinQ aaraQes controlled by perpetual aoreements
between the city and the property owner to provide valet parkina that allow for liens against the properties in the
event the valet parkinll is discontinued: such allreements shall be continQent upon approval of the traffic enllineer
and city attornev.
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance have been found to be consistent with the Citv of Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adOPtion.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
77
OCTOBER, 1993
" : ~
. ,
\,..,.,
Rita Garvev
Mavor-Commissioner
Attest:
. , ~
..,',
. ':~
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Approved as to form and correctness:
M; A. Galbraith. Jr.
City Attornev "',
, . CITY OF GLEARW ATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
78
OcrOBER, 1993
,
"
i
APPENDIX F
RELOCATION POLICY
The City of Clearwater Downtown Development Plan proposes possible redevelopment activities associated with
priority land uses (as defined bv district within the Plan) that mav result in the displacement of low and moderate
income persons. In the event that such displacement occurs, the followino relocation policy is established to assist
these persons in relocation.
Definitions.
"LOW-TO-MODERATE INCOME" is defined as a household income that does not exceed 80% of the
median income for the Tampa/St.Petersbura/Clearwater Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined by the United
States Department of Housino and Urban Development and adiusted for household size.
"REASONABLE RELOCATION EXPENSES" are defined as:
A. Movino expenses of the displaced persons and their property for a distance of 50 miles. Transportation
cost for a distance bevond 50 miles can be iustified. The discretion to determine whether movina costs
beyond 50 miles are re'asonable and necessary is at the sole discretion of the Community Redevelopment
Aoency.
B. First and last month's rent for new accommodations.
C. Security deposit for new accommodations.
th Utilitv deposits and/or reconnection of utilities (not includina line extensions or other capital expenses) for
new accommodations.
.5.:. Anv movino expense not described above that is determined by the Community Redevelopment Aoencv
to be reasonable and necessary.
Minimum Reauired Relocation Plan Provisions,
The City of Clearwater Downtown Development Plan establishes the followino prOVISIons reaardino
residential relocation that occurs within the oeoaraphical boundaries of the Downtown area.
ill The City of Clearwater shall make its best effort to provide written notice to residential tenants who will
be displaced 60 days prior to loss of possession.
ill The City of Clearwater shall provide advisorv services, as appropriate, includinQ counselino, referrals to
suitable, decent, safe and sanitarv replacement housino which is comparable, within the tenant's financial
means, and housino-related advisory services.
ill The City of Clearwater shall provide payment and/or reimbursement of actual reasonable relocation
expenses for displaced low-to-moderate income persons UP to a maximum of $1 ,000.00 per household.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
79
OCTOBER, 1993
:~~
,', ,'/ '1.:
"
i'."',' ..
APPENDIX G
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA
.."..",;,,'
('''-
" ~"I
: .
. . .
~ ' ' ," ,. t
. ,
. .
. .
. ,
.' -
, . .
" '. " ,",
, .'.. f," .
DOWNTOWN
CLEARWATER
. - PERIPHERY PLAN -
CLEARWATER
CITY COMMISSION
C MAYOR RITA GARVEY
COMMISSIONER RICHARD FITZGERALD
. COMMISSIONER SUE BERFIELD
COMMISSIONER ARTHUR X. DEEGAN
COMMISSIONER FRED A. THOMAS
. C~,..
. ".i
.x .
PREPARED BY: ,
CITY OF CLEARWATER
.. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MICHAEL J. WRIGHT, CITY MANAGER'
OCTOBER 7, 1993
r
"
,~
i
~
'T
:~
~
'~
~
~
</.
.~
,!
~
l
!:
,
\. '
'-,
'1
o}
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER
PERIPHERY PLAN
INTRODUCTION
As part of public discussion on the 1993 reVISions to the City of Clearwater Downtown
Development Plan, areas on the periphery of the 1983 Community Redevelopment Area (CRA)
were also examined. As a policy decision, the Clearwater City Commission decided not to
expand the CRA into any periphery areas at the present time. However, the Commission had
specific zoning and redevelopment concepts for the periphery areas. This Periphery Plan
addresses these key areas on the boundary of the existing CRA.
Four periphery areas are proposed to be added to the overall Comprehensive Land Use Plan
classification for possible eventual inclusion in the CRA. These areas are located adjacent to
the Bayfront district to the northwest, the Core district to the southwest, and the Eastern
Corridor district to both the northeast and southeast. The proposed land use plan designation
for these areas is Central Business District, the same as the existing Downtown. There are
no zoning changes immediately planned for the Northwest and Southwest Expansion Areas,
although a draft to performance zoning" new zoning district has been developed for Commission
consideration. (This draft zoning district is provided as Appendix B.) The proposed zoning
for the Northeast and Southeast Expansion Areas is Urban Center (Transition) and Urban
Center (Eastern Corridor), respectively.
Under the proposed "performance zoning" zoning district, specific, desired land uses will be
provided with substantial development incentives. In the Northwest Expansion Area,
incentives for residential uses will be established, although some manufacturing uses may also
receive development incentives. In the Southwest Expansion Area, priority uses include mixed
office and residential uses, as well as manufacturing/industrial type uses.
A "use intensity" comparison of existing zoning districts and the proposed zoning for each
area discussed in this plan is provided in Appendix A.
While these areas are not currently proposed to be within the formal "redevelopment area"
for Downtown Clearwater, the areas are considered to be important to the success of the
Downtown because of their locational characteristics. The Northwest Expansion Area,
adjacent to both the Bayfront and Core districts along Clearwater Harbor, is considered to be
a prime area for residential development.
The Southwest Expansion Area, adjacent to the Core district, is a likely area for
redevelopment due to property ownership patterns and location adjacent to the Urban Center
(Core) zoning. The Northeast Expansion Area adjacent to the Eastern Corridor District is
important to Downtown redevelopment because of its location along the north-central edge
of the Downtown. This location, near small offices and single family residential uses, requires
that land uses in this area be carefully controlled. This will help the Downtown to be a "good
neighbor" to the surrounding neighborhood.
The Southeast Expansion Area, adjacenttothe existing Urban Center (Eastern Corridor) zoning
district, is important to Downtown redevelopment because it contains property adjacent to
a large area of City-owned land proposed for redevelopment, as well as areas suitable for
mixed use (residential/office) development. There is significant public ownership of land in
this area.
Table 1 summarizes zoning and Land Use Plan proposals for these areas.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
1
.' .~ ".. . " ' . '. . ,. _ " ~ w ", _', :. ",
c'
_.
.(
\"
C,'
, > "
, .,
. . d
I!.
. .
. ~ , ..
." "
,
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF EXPANSION AREA
ZONING AND LAND USE PLAN PROPOSALS
. I
i
1
:
I
.1
EXPANSION
AREA
.
PROPOSED PROPOSED LAND USE
20NING PLAN DESIGNATION
CURRENTL Y - VARIOUS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT I
I
I
PROPOSED -
PERFORMANCE
ZONING EMPHASIZING
HIGH DENSITY
MULTIPLE FAMILY AND
"HIGH TECH"
INDUSTRIAL*
CURRENTL Y - VARIOUS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED -
PERFORMANCE
ZONING EMPHASIZING
HIGH DENSITY
MUL TIPLE FAMIL Y AND
"HIGH TECH"
INDUSTRIAL *
CURRENTL Y - VARIOUS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED - URBAN
CENTER (TRANSITION)
CURRENTL Y - VARIOUS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED - URBAN
CENTER (EASTERN
CORRIDOR)
NORTHWEST
SOUTHWEST
NORTHEAST
SOUTHEAST
. * NOTE: PERFORMANCE ZONING DISTRICT IS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
,;
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERI PH ERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
.2
,
.:' '. ~ .... ;q:.,~:..; ..'" ".....::...,. , " '" .....,J
r
~
t)
EXPANSION AREAS
The proposed expansion areas are discussed in more detail below, utilizing the following
format:
The Function issue refers to the discrete land use characteristics of each district.
Linkages involve the specific ways each district relates to surrounding development.
;
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
, I
Assembly Possibilities refer to the ownership pattern, land use, property value, and
property condition characteristics of the district. These characteristics determine how
feasible it might be to assemble land for redevelopment purposes.
Design and Zoning Issues are concerned with the aesthetic relationship within and
between districts, and with specific zoning requirements that must be either
established, revised or reaffirmed for each of the districts.
Priority land Uses are the types of land uses to be encouraged in each district.
NORTHWEST EXPANSION AREA
The northwest expansion area is an area of mixed residential, commercial, office, and quasi-
industrial uses located directly to the north of the Bayfront and Core districts. It is bounded
by Clearwater Harbor to the west, Nicholson Street to the north, the Pinellas Trail and Myrtle
Avenue to the east, and Jones Street to the south (see Figure A-1). The largest individual use
in this area is the City of Clearwater Utilities Group and Purchasing Division Headquarters
located west of Myrtle Avenue in the southeast corner of this district. There are also two
large condominium developments on Clearwater Harbor in the western part of this area.
FUNCTION
The northwest expansion area serves as a support district for both the Bayfront
and the Core districts. It has been added to the land use planning classification
for Downtown Clearwater for several reasons:
~ To include a predominately residential area into the Downtown
planning area in order to improve the functional relationship
between the existing Core and Bayfront zoning districts and this
residential area along Clearwater Harbor.
~ To take advantage of the linear park offered by the Pinellas Trail
to encourage higher density residential redevelopment of portions
of this area.
~ To make allowances for supplementary commercial activity in support of the
higher density residential development.
~ To provide a location for less intensive, "high tech" industrial
assembly and manufacturing type uses in close proximity to
Downtown Clearwater.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
3
C
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
C~-, >-1
<{
~I
....
;/
.
~I
(fJ
8/
<
cr
~/
I
r
I
f
"
: ~: "1
. '.: ". ',.
, "r.:", ~ ""r;' ,..': '
" '
, ,
, t
" c "
'," <" ,
~. " ~. : . ',: >
(' t~' .
"
~ ; ".,
::'1
, ,
, . ,
. .. ,. ...,.... .1 l'""'~" '. J ~.'. ~ ".:" ~.'.:',
, ;^ .' "
11IO
I
1
},
.,:"
I' ,
I i
I
, '
,----------, .~
,
,
,
I
,
SEAWALL
~4~ .
~~
,
J
-----
,- --- ---------{
; "'.l. f..
,
o
.,
NICHOLSON
STREET
__ l .111 ;../ J I
___ -~ / /L__/ /------; ~A7i
-r---- L IJ .. / /J -- ---
.. --j-/ r--l----7~H--j/-- --.
STREET ~
../ -{7 ../I.----/i__
,L-JiI: I J 7~ ',.
. ff-- /~I ..' /I ;___
.. I /-----1-- --lj
!, 14tJl'Ji 7i;
I, IIG 40 J T !Ie
------ ---- ~~~ --1--
w
>
c ----.~
8, '"
$ ---
c
o
,
VAC1
/
~-;.....;; :
~--JJ:.-_~~"-
, "~..' ' '. ':'
..;. ..........-....'.............
,'. ,;'.r:' .', -....~......-...._^~ '.. .
:,fj .... ....... ----
---
, :
,',i...
.': .
--------
.
,
I
"
I,
"
"
,
I
1.,.------:'" '
.. .,; C
":"', '
...-:-
~
','
:/, .
" . .',
51
I
I
I
,
, ';';:"'; \ :
I
-
I
I
f
", I
I
:',': f
I
, I
, I
I I
I I
, I
I I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
--
111"'1- ....
~
~
a
:~\
II! I~ I::)
,..~
:,1 ,"
4'
IN
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPE
I I
I I
~I :w
~
w
>
c(
~.......
/:.
jg
1
W
...J
~
IX:
>-
:::l
STREET i
,fil ~
I Li,\}! ..
~
.f
STR.EE:T s
"
" .
,".. . .
j ,,~ ..' '
. .
. ,
'.
,. ~ .:'. "\
, .
..
l~
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPERTY
L.:'
,f
..
I
. '"" .
Figure A-1
NORTHWEST EXPANSION AREA
CHARTER STATEMENTS
ACCESSIBLE
ECONOMIC CENTER
UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES
GOOD PLACE TO LIVE
GOOD NEIGHBOR
ORIENTED TOWARD THE WATERFRONT
LINKAGES
PINELLAS TRAIL
URBAN PARK
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
WATER VIEWS
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
KEY FEATURES
MIXTURE OF LAND USES
GOOD ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC BOAT LAUNCHING
PRIVATE MARINA
PRIORITY LAND USES
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
"HIGH TECH" MANUFACTURING
AND ASSEMBLY USES
MARINA FACILITIES
MIXED USE (RESIDENTIAUCOMMERCIAL)
.
1
, '
t
~
PREPARED BY:
CLEARW ATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1992
LINKAGES
The northwest expansion area is an area of widely varied land uses.
Redevelopment of this area with high intensity residential and low intensity
p", manufacturing/assembly type uses will create an area of strong support for the
.,~ Core and Bayfront zoning districts. Creating a residential/job base in this area
will allow for a dynamic interplay between this area and the two adjacent
Downtown districts.
Improvement of this area's access to the existing Core and Bayfront districts
should be an important component of future planning for this area. Since the
area is being targeted for high density residential development, it is appropriate
to consider a new urban park in this area over the next five to 10 years,
depending upon the extent that new development occurs. Linkage of this urban
park with the Pinellas Trail would be a logical connection. '
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Private assembly of land in this area appears likely, especially along Clearwater
Harbor where there is a strong potential for higher density residential uses. In
the western portion of this expansion area there is a large amount of publicly
owned property, including the Utilities/Purchasing property owned by the City
of Clearwater. The existing, varied land uses in this area tend to undervalue
this property from a tax and market valuation standpoint, creating a potential
assembly possibility.
DESIGN AND ZON ING ISSUES
Under the" performance zoning" approach proposed for this area, substantial
density and height bonuses will be provided to residential developments which
meet the criteria to be established. It would seem appropriate to allow tall
residential structures in this area in order to promote the scenic views of
Clearwater Harbor. Waterfront properties, because of their location, should be
somewhat more restricted in allowable height than properties further to the
east. The Pinellas Trail, which runs through this expansion area, will enhance
the livability of this area as new development occurs.
Industrial/assembly uses which are allowed should be controlled regarding the
types of uses and overall site design in order to minimize their potential
negative impact on surrounding residential development.
PRIORITY LAND USES
As has been discussed, the priority land uses for this expansion area will be
high density residential and "high tech" manufacturing/assembly uses. The
depressed property values, along with the general underutilization of the
property in this area, the relatively substantial amount of public ownership, and
the exceptional waterfront views offered by the bluff location along Clearwater
Harbor, are considered to be positive factors which will promote the private
redevelopment of this area.
".---'
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTO 8ER, 1 993
5
. .~, " ,"';:'," .:10.',' .-
(
~'
. .;1
',,";
SOUTHWEST EXPANSION AREA
The southwest expansion area consists of an area of mixed land uses directly to the south of
the Core district. It is bounded by Fort Harrison Avenue to the west, Chestnut Street to the
north, Myrtle and East Avenues to the east, and Druid Road to the south (sse Figure A-2).
FUNCTION
Like the northwest expansion area, the southwest expansion area is also
considered to be a support area for the Core district and Downtown Clearwater
as a whole. The area consists of a variety of commercial and office uses.
Within this area, however, a variety of mixed residential/office development
should be encouraged, as well as possible low intensity manufacturing and
assembly type uses.
LINKAGES
As previously mentioned, the southwest expansion area contains a variety of
land uses. Promoting high intensity residential development and industrial and
assem bly uses of a "high tech tl nature in this area will allow it to become a
strong support area for the Core district. An urban park should be developed
in this area within the next five to 10 years in order to support anticipated
residential development. A regional stormwater retention project is likely to be
developed in this area, and the proposed park could be designed into the
retention project.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Assembly possibilities are relatively good in this area due to the variety of land
uses, but such assembly is hampered by the number of relatively small lots.
There are some properties of significant size under individual ownership; these
properties could be expected to develop first.
DESIGN AND ZONING ISSUES
Improved open space in this area could be achieved through the creation of a
regional storm water retention facility and through the development of an urban
park. Careful planning of these features could enhance the livability of this area
as new residential development occurs. It is important that the residential
development of this area be shielded from those industrial and assembly uses
that do occur. This can be accomplished through specific performance
standards for nonresidential development.
PRIORITY LAND USES
Priority land uses within the southwest expansion district have been discussed
at length above. These uses are:
.. High density residential.
.. Mixed residential/office.
.. Low intensity industrial/assembly uses.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
6
" ~. '1 ~ .", . ~ ,
, " '.'. ~ .
~".~" -.
:;.~: ':'"
1"
, ii"
:r~{,~:~~~~,.~, ~;
~
\;n,~.f'
I,
, "
i
~
..'
~i
~~,
'"
~ ;:.
S::..,
:~,
:
i
,.'
\
, ' ' ',::,,',;""I"'" "...~/.' : ,~~,,-,c,-, ,
" , :> ,;::;f~l'~'~, ,;',;; ~:; , ""
,
.. k'~ -~ "t ..1 t ;
f
~l~ "
',to'
.~ i ~
:-~'\';l::~' , . '.. \
,1' ~ ".1-
.J ,t
~. ," :J \<-. > '::~~~l ,~,: >,'
~,:i:""~,c>';,,~.:~,, :..:.
'. : ~~'. 4'
"
_, ;,~l ~~~ ,~~~., I :
,
"
"
, 't~"",:t;~;\
~~ r '::
.'"i"
~ .._, .~.,.v ~ t I_ , ....,..~
,
..
!
<,
-'~ :
,..
~.. ., ;
-- ,<.'
-"
r,......'
" '
^:~
'..>
'1,',.,
,.'
r~:
., :t';
,,'
"
"
'"',,
','_c;, :,,',i;,;':::": "":';7, ,;Ci'-',(."", ", ,.;_.".:;, '...
',' }:':('<:~"::::';':))Y;~":'b
- :', :-..,/.~~
"i :':..~. . :.~~~1
.. <:~i~~
I'" ~, . :....
'"
'I:)
>","
"
-, - ~--,:'-
:: _ ""', :-
i' " ',:.'.'''' ","-,' ~,!.>,;,: '<'
-1-"" '
1 1'.,0 j """ -
,j.;~ ",:;"
( .v ~,' .1 :.'1"
>~'.t;,::~
:':; ,l<;~
:: .: I '':~;
(::r>: ~
'- ~~,'i";";:i'~ill'd"?;i;;';';';,:',j;':1 1:'" STREET ~
'.. 'JJ- ' ,.; I i ;~~1:~"i'&~Pi::II";i!Z' ,"';'I,:::J:',I':;,':'; '" ,~
"""'~"__"'"";:'if'>~,i""!!""~'~'r.'.',l.",':"~:,~';\..~'~:::,::1:,.'~",.,:1,",_.:','~,_',~',~,'~:;:':'~,.',.,i",",~:,':;',::' .)~;~::s.:~' 1._,tJ\tJ- I I~~ ,.';.....: ~ , ,... '
.~' ~ ",',; ,,~_ }j;;~: '(~l:i~ ' ::::':'I'::A:' I~\k;:: r)~ :).
~ :,' :",'" ';:,':"i)' 1';>,W.< ":--.1,,,.-:;', !.';". }"} "t:~'
_ -""-'''J;-?.i~';!;~;':- s '~:'~~"~I::~:~~~' ,~~#'~J' ';l;;"II,:~:<;~'l~}f; /.~~, ;S)~
Q(P,,,,_J> , 'I ~ "'i"'" "~''''' ''''(',\~ ."~'C ,::;Si \ i.' I "i:!, \y"" ;.,{l
}~ft;:~;:~.~~ i ~,'f~':,'t,~;:.:,I';,~,~"I.i1.,~',~.!' ,:,~i:1,~~,::: ,:~,!},(,,;,~,>:,,'~:,~;.};~:1 ~~,,:h.~~.':,; :~1:,I;, ;i~,~~
" . "..' ,;l,.~t1..i?'idt; :tel ;:.:!:~;:;;,lf,':':'f,;:.,,:i,\1 .Y," .:';,' ',,':,~J,c. ',;,:';:~,;' 1,:,'::';"!:;;J,,HI.;:i',i;':...
~i~l"q..r;r-.Y.'I , ,"i,r, '.!j:,' I'>'~;"I "",', ',"'" c,: I,' " · .~ .
, , .;"".,....,J':'~~J:; .:,:~'~;~...l.~'~:"~,:'.:.'~".:'.i" I 02 H " ,0, :-J.y 1;,i~~'I';;;t,:;t;~f
l.. '. '" AROLD CT a ,'>';; 1:;;;r~.::~~;'I~;!~
, I ,.!:'~,~'; (,.'.6,1 luL /:,:~ III '),;" 1,:V;'i;~'t.;I;;!:!'
~<,.;;" 11& t~1 '~ ,<': ~~{ >;;;,~;)~M~~
~!!~I,!j.t41 i ~ 't~ ! "".. !i.!k'li!:!
P1NE .! STREET
1l:'."p.~'\:'.'AtJli{<fi1' I
~------H,:'~d;{iJi~~~~~~ r;~~ E~t !'~~Ir ;:~" ~~l I :
______-'.",.,... ..... ,. {. "j, O:'~"'''' I ~~ ! !
,,~;,,<,Y:"~, :,1;: j.:;;' L~;; I,(t~; I';~~ I '1>",,- I I
~ II' :,":'j .,0",::+,\;; :{if.,'.' 1 r~,;" I iJ; ,J;r;c I \'i~ I I
- ---, ,,- .. .. ;m' I,,,, .M', l~ .. i;i}; "",', :
.~ '..!..ti i.\~l-/I';..-..r:t'.";i:ltI~ 'i.....'i....~ r'.":""i-
"" .;':i :if'~,~ ,,:''''' ;',::H~~:;( ::;;~i'l' sr..;';:I': I
,\ c, '0,11:;\ i'~li\l; .$ <'J~ ,.,"e, I,...;,%; 1,;'1"1) I
_ _ _ :~~~'~~ ~~;:~~1 ' ~~~f!., ~t;l~ :
,':';,\;i~I!<:;: ,''', ,. ",,'''t "~I ,", :+,0,:;.1, I
, H;~" -, ;(;f ~ ;;.:>~Rf~/ .. . ~ .: .:tf:;~', ~J~J~ :
-,. -.:,
....... I, ;
",l-
.\
, " rd'"'''' " ,,:,:.j~)b:
'," ': .'.', .,.,. ~ A~~!.~,!:;::S~::t' :'..,;". ,
," ,c, ,q, ' " ,j{\'t;';, ' '.'
": ~ ~.~~'j,;~~ 't~_~. ~,_~~>j~ ~:~. \':..:,:.:~~ "
. . ,..~. ~'- ,.', ,: -. ",.""-:,,
· - ....51tB;";~i;?:' ::: ·
Y-"': ."
: , ," ,,' ::"" ,.,., " :
~,;, ~:' ',~~~.. :'~ >" . "t> ,"".-; " (, ;.. '
. ",', ,."'"' :...oi' i:' -.'':
-, ,--
HJ--~TNU'r
: r
I
I
,
RS qTRl-1 __:!,_I... I
,:,.:,.', ',.' '::C ' ' --
,:;1 ';;,:,~ ,:t;:ni~f:j~~~t i:vi,'
r$;r,,~7', ~'r:; "", r~ j!i' '~;:;id;:~;W~t;:; :t;:,;!;
I';~i"'h' "., "",,};' "",,,,; ,,,,,'::': ,,";"', " ''',< '. "",,,'" !(:,.':,,"""';:'
. ".':,'" ::::/" ,,'::,:;1 ,;;;:, I r.i;;;;,:, I'::'....:':.) (,':; :,:,' :"", .~;,i ,~',;;/
r:o'''::;' I;:',"" ,';,~ '. <' "'i',,' 1'",,_,' ',,' "', "::4;; I'"
lli/~ ~~Xj'i. ;;'~'~,?I X{{~h::;~i;~\::~}j,I::;it:~';;-:f~ !<!;r~{.
~~: ~ ,~~~~,\
YotB":.;, ,,~~:;;$,""
....!..:!. ,I" t.'.
~a:~))~~f..f;~;~ o'i, ..
'1,~~~1~T.(~<tft
~
z
a
(/)
cr
0::
c(
:x:
51
t-
o::
o
u..
ORUIO
./'
"
""""" .:
.'
"
, "
.'
~,,;"
,'./ '.,
"," ;-,
,,'
"'/""'\ :',.;.:,',
" ,:..D'P,:',':;", ';', ,
<; ',... ";.-':.~;;,...:~'<-~ ','~'
.,\<
; :
/" ~:
,.(-
':1
.,,,: ~
: ~
'i.1 ,;i . ".:c",: "..:' '.:i,'
~,:', \,<~,:\ .e>:;,:,;/,i :</ ",~,c. :>"g~;:t'1~f;~~fr'~ ; " " -'
~i" ._.....".... ~ < ...:.~~ .~~./.~<~i.;\.: ~X~-1"~:;',~
, , .;'" ":'.": ',~ ''''. -" " :. ,. .,
, '";'!:. '$1i','-" z >: ~ '.-
,
1;
....:>.,:,:
':,;" "',,,'
",.;~:},~:;:~
..;>,'i: ~.,,"
~~, ~v
,,'~;~;r
'. >,~ F':;~':;~:('{"
" ,.;.,
,,' .: ,>;:,;': ~\;;;>"
,', " . :';,;{';X:~~,,:,:.. ,
". ~ -,
-
" ~
:,:,:'?~:::: ';, " ,;
. ~..,:,:;:;:,~;,">
'.',,:;; :.(, 'j,;'~
;,!,:,.<; ;::" ",
:r;i ?:' ,":
, , . 'i :
. c"."
. - _~>;,..<:;i
, ;~':';."::'\
, :;,.,/~'i,
': '." ';:!\:;&:"h'
":':,,>~:~,h
: ,',:" <;,~;:<Jf
" ':,,:'<":, , "
,: ,';':\::<t
'::',;; ",
.' r," ,/.:\::;:::.,:;:;;i
I
:' ';, ,.::c.'
, '~::"<';;~' 'i),;
. ",:,"'}:":",',
. ' - ' ,.' ':<:::;:..;;'. ;.:':;"
,~, . :: j~'<;';\:s~;::c'i:)\ ..
,.: :', ,j,;)}f u:" ,
.' ,- ....,;:;:".:.'."..'<: ""~
,'.;',Y/('."" :.:':
./,;'/-/:..) ,;.J'
, "-:~:~:,,.'u :~;~: ,~~:::-<: "
, i :(::\;: "j""',;,;:'"
, " ";ib :;':" ,'r'., "';;;::,)iX
. ::: . :;::;;:',~' ':!.,,~::::>,(it';;'
, v.i.;,::,::> ",
',; ':',-,,/~,":: ,/..;('~~::.):,,:;,
','f:c" .. .' I" ,.:.;,.>
."?: '::';,;'::;:-');J;;',~;' 'J'
, '.:;,: i'j ;J.;;;.;:, "<::: .;'r,'-
l!
nf
> ~ i '
~
',.:;
"'" '..,,}"
:,;~;;,\:::'j ';".'
. /;,/:~;./:' <~' ;:
}'.; ::."" .
'. '~f\":';?' '~";:',c ,"
, , :;"" ",:'"
, '0 ,;';': ':;, 0::: "..\'
:, "'::: :,' ,
,.. ',.( :;'t
::.,J:}; },
. " "',':]':
, :-;'(, '..::;', ':;:' :'.
", <::::'c ;>.\:',;:';); ,
. .:,<i;\ ,!:.
., ' :- ,:" \:,'
':::~?:,:<{~ ~:;<~:.<' "~';
" ' ,".: :;;" ./ :";
': '''''",
.' '.: :,'
.- :;;', '.X:> .:,
:' ,.'.':{,:) '); ... ,
'..' ',,,.;,',i,i,,:':,,,: ' "
"<,
::,
',,"
''::''
,;/
...';,~
"
''C.. '
~;
;':
".
.,'
.'
, "
"
-.J.
"
,Go, l
" '
"
"
.' <~
.-
',_t,.
" "
.....1"
"
. ,:, -..~?;n,.
.',\, ,:,: ,:~;:;{'.";:" ">>
:' ;i', ,; :f'F:':::,,' :"i
.J,' "
; "
.. '
,.
.
UNDER-UTILIZED' PROPEF
,
.,,::iji, :~~',;,:<,;; ';
;:::~::;L,;::i,'~ ;,,:;.: ,<;;"!i),' C
"":,~~~)::;}~,~;:::',~'i;, . '-,;: i:f;/:~(
" .":},'/':(',:;; .y;,: . ;:,r, ,"
, ' , ' . " . '.: " ;,.':';:',
.. ....:y,.~,,: .,::\:,::,:::; .. ,:,-;::::'T\
" . ',~::::X';'I'" '.,:;";:: ,^ :", .,;.;:7<
":;Ur~;.:: .',', '/:':;';.,:;:' ,'\ -
.. .. ,.,' ,':;:, y" ,-. ,
..l' '~'~:.:.~ ~::.:_/~'.<<.: " ~,.
'~'.,,"';.,,:i'/':'::.";,i;.c !';\"':,,::.:
:,: ' ,::.,.':",' ",'..:, ' \:
,','",:".', ,,::,;"';',<.:':" ',' "
, . ,0.',,-,: ':,:!:.<:\::" ,fi'" , '
.. '.. :?~:>:,::.'::;(:,;(. 0",":: .' ,',::''::, '
"",e.' '," .::,'<': ..<\';-:
" ".' '" .,,:.:i" "<:""-;:;':'.:i,i:;;'{ . :,: :....'
'~.. ':' " <,>>F"T1'~'(': ,;' ",,;.':':;:.:~':ri,' ""
':''': \", 'Y'" ""',,:.,'u;' ;~:";""':';":,S'':';>. "'.':,
, .', ;."".;.:<,.'!,,: ',( ,', .f,::':!:;;':;
"";5 !['t':; ':f, \,,:;;~';"',,;,::;;:;: ::;';..,,"" ,,:" ;r;~.
, .,'1) ,,;n';:';,}".~L ..,y, !,:':.::",:.;',
.. ',;, ' ,::;;'::..'::,,;:; ,:i:' ",;,,;,.", ,,!,"
, '" " )i:' -:':'i;~'-'.;.';(' :,'; :::.:,\c ":", : :',
, ,.:."~,; ,', 'r};':;'; -',>;:.; .." ",..' , ' . '
.- ,';:} , '~'\';]~~:.\:'C:;~ . i>:::';< ,.(, "~"l~":; ., :~} .- , .',
;,:,!,: ",',: ' ' ",."':';';,',';'> :': /,,:<' ", ..",
"." .. ,';. ,':;' '::.: . ,: ...:'. ",',':' "
, .:/)~:;.;!' '" ,< ' >"",f?/,.<
' ':, , ' , :;,W.C ":'; " ";, ,,', > ,:' , , .'
: . .,,:;'; ,,'; , , :,.,:;,;;".'., . "',.", .' ' -
:' : .', ,;,; :,:;,/..: ;/':: ;,':,;>,:,
.' ",. " :{,;;;,:::,,.>~~;.,, ,:" ':.><,:;~,:Y'; :,.-,_ "
. ';::;i;<;~J;;';; ;.j;~\),: ,;' .. .'. ... .
. :: ,':':,:'.:':~:. " ' "", ,'," ::~,,":: ""':';""
:,:":,< "'. .
x .. ~ .~
'. ,>::';'\;;'<!,;, .
, '.' -:>: <,',' , ,: ':, ,. ~};.:..., ::;'
, , ,..' '<,,:' ,,'.; "/,,:. ',\,:,.:. "
: " ',' ,',};".:':'/,>,'"
,', :' '~<:/"':/",::\".;" .
" '> ".:,' }'-:.;':,,) c:;"":':::' " '. .
,;" ,'," "';':':'" ,,;.,. ' .' ',:, .' /,"~;
"
" ~ I~
,,' "
,
Figure A-2
SOUTHWEST EXPANSION AREA
CHARTER STATEMENTS
UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES
GOOD PLACE TO LIVE
GOOD NEIGHBOR
l~
LINKAGES
j
URBAN PARK 11,:
REGIONAL STORMWATER FACILITY
FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPERTY
KEY FEATURES
MIXTURE OF LAND,USES
GOOD ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
PRIORITY LAND USES
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MIXED OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL,
"HIGH TECH" MANUFACTURING
AND ASSEMBLY USES
, ,
.' ,
PREPARED BY:
. . ". . '. . CLEARWATER ...,'
. 'PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ....
1992
r'
~
..' '.
(
, '
"--.- .'
NORTHEAST EXPANSION AREA
The northeast expansion area is a relatively small area containing a mixture of small-scale land
uses. It serves, to some extent, as a buffer between the more intensive development to the
south and the residential and small office areas to the north. Its boundaries are: Myrtle
Avenue to the west, Drew Street to the north, Greenwood Avenue to the east, and Grove
Street to the south (see Figure A-3).
FUNCTION
This area will serve a mixed use/support function _ for the Eastern Corridor and
Core District. The primary uses in this area will likely be smaller offices and
residential uses. In particular, the interior portion of this expansion area
(properties other than those fronting on Drew Street) is well suited for
residential uses due to its proximity to both the Core District and surrounding
residential neighborhood.
LINKAGES
This area serves as an "edge" area for Downtown Clearwater. That is, it is a
critical boundary area which needs careful development in order to ensure that
the Downtown as a whole is compatible with nearby residential and small office
development.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Assembly possibilities in this area are good due to a relatively large amount of
vacant land. Assembly for residential/office uses should be a priority,
particularly when mixed use projects containing 50% or more residential
development are proposed.
DESIGN ISSUES
Due to the nearby location of residential and small office development, it is
important that the scale of structures in the area, as well as the type of uses,
be compatible with those nearby uses. The development requirements for the
Limited Office zoning district to the north of this area along Drew Street will
serve, to some extent, as a buffer for more intense uses which may be
developed in this area. However, this buffer area is not large, so it is desirable
that relatively low structural height and relatively low floor area ratio type
development is allowed to be constructed in this expansion area.
ZONING ISSUES
Because of the proximity of residential development, a less intensive zoning
district is appropriate for this area. Such a zoning district would promote
relatively low intensity type office development, as well as medium high density
residential development (up to 28 dwelling units per acre). In Appendix C, the
proposed modifications to the Urban Center District regulations include a new
Urban Center Transition (UC(Tl) subdistrict.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
8
r,
\~~:>
KEY FEATURES
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPERTY
MIXTURE OF LAND USES
GOOD ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Ii,:", I
PRIORITY LAND USES
.
MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MIXED OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL USES
PREPARED BY:
CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1992
c.
~
PRIORITY LAND USES
Within the northeast expansion area, the following can be considered priority
uses:
~
Medium-high density residential.
~ Mixed office/residential uses,
These uses provide an appropriate transition from the more intense Eastern
Corridor zoning to the south and the office and residential uses to the north.
SOUTHEAST EXPANSION AREA
The southeast expansion area is another relatively small area containing a mixture of small-
scale land uses. The boundaries of this are Myrtle Avenue to the west, Pierce and Gould
Str'eets to the north, Missouri A venue to the east, and the northern side of Court Street to the
south (see Figure A-4).
FUNCTION
The function of this expansion area is, like the northeast expansion area, is to
serve as a support district for both the Core and Eastern Corridor Districts. This
district is somewhat larger than the northeast expansion area, and does not
serve as an"edge" district to the same extent. Due to existing development
patterns and the existence of a major arterial (Court Street) through this
District, retail uses have occurred and should be encouraged.
LINKAGES
The existence of Court Street and Chestnut Street within this area make it an
important in terms of access to Downtown Clearwater. Because of this access
orientation, it is important that development along these major accessways be
controlled in terms of landscaping and other appearance issues. Because the
area is promoted in this plan as a mixed use area having important residential,
office, and retail development possibilities, within ten years public investment
needs to be made in terms of an urban park (perhaps in conjunction with a
private redevelopment project or a storm water retention project) which will
serve as an amenity for anticipated reside'ntial development.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
In this area, assembly possibilities are quite good given the relatively
underutilized development pattern, with the exception being the uses located
along Court Street. There are a number of underutilized properties in this area,
and some assembly for residential/office/retail uses is possible and should be
encouraged.
DESIGN ISSUES
As mentioned above, this area serves as a major entryway into Downtown
Clearwater. Consequently, remedial landscaping along Court Street is
extremely desirable and should be pursued to the extent possible.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
10
, . .
.... '. .' . . " .. '.. . ' ,. " .
'f'
c'
C'~'l
";it)
/ ,
'-./
; ~ . . , 'l ,.'".' .
'\"
!~ '.;., :.:'.": ,~.. "
, .: \'\ ~''''';J
"' ."
'; """" '~
. i ."
" . '~.~', ,,~ ." ...1 .;, ..t. '~'~".~ ", u "
~.;:;':"""'';.', ',;,:F
~ Residential uses.
ZONING ISSUES
Because of the somewhat intense existing development along Court Street in
this area, Urban Center (Eastern Corridor) zoning is recommended. This zoning
will provide the flexibility for the desired development and redevelopment of
this area. Few nonconformities will be created through this change in zoning.
PRIORITY LAND USES
Within the southeast expansion area, priority uses include:
~ Office uses.
~ Retail uses.
" As indicated in the discussion for priority land uses for the Eastern Corridor
District, property along the major thoroughfares through this area is most
suitable for retail uses. Residential and office uses can be provided in locations
not directly fronting on these thoroughfares.
~. .
-".'
i
:'1
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993 "
1 1
:,...;, !:':."l'\"', ~_;',:~..;f..~: ;....~~;.."' '
;
",""".'
c'
'!I ""iV,':',
~ . .iV,:;-;"",' ..\i .. " ..
~ ;,~'::+;::',;::;~ ,./,:',':,; ',;,;.
;;D;;:'~~;:C .~
. ,:~;:,,'j/';;;'.r;: '":/':',Y;,;':;
i~'~~~;:,:' ,;,;:':'':':;~;L I
I
P"luou.
!:I':';', .:!...... ',!;:~
i ;;:,,(,. <,:;:
c ~J:-: "
~I';"
\J""""'"
i'.'F'..'!' ri
----
:'"<,,.':,"
IV' .
Pl'..... '
~\.}":.,, . ..
,"'.;".,,;,: :. .'
.'t!}',:."",:::,::::
snu:T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
{
~- -- -- - :;};F,,~;sri7
, {'I
,.i',:':, . : 2l
.;::;,;:;;;::;,,::,t :" t
, .0','>:":::' ,~,;, ".,'
, " ":":','>,' '",:, '.. .....' ,
-~;~'~7\ )r! ~;j!~';
Ii~::' Iy",
"l~ ,f !{X~ "..
1',\ ',:,:1:,,,
<:; :,:"{ ,
IllLJ.Jl
/{: : .,:<;
::''',1<
r)~~; :1:;
',', .i,i: ""
, ' ":".' ',,,~
". -; ~ .
": .~'> :;, t
.' '" 'i: ':":"
I;..,,'....':'.. .
i 77.".:,:L
------- ;>,"1:0,>"
...;.... ,'~,
"'~ "';"r
I · ,'::."
':'. '
2,; ~iJ~'" ~:'~:"'~"::'
:"; ,;';r '; ~"r"',~. :}:
" ~~;; ~~ .. "1' ,,' /j;'
:.: ?,';,'>c.',':'::;' 'c':' 1 ',;':. ,i,:,
~>:~ :..;' _;..; 1."."....'.-:: i;-r~"
"',':': ", !./..," ':f';':'
ITJm;T
.
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
:
a
s
r--------------
vlC YAC
,,,-,,,,,,.,,:,:,;,
:,.,'". ::,'",' -------
l ------
1-------
';;:i;'<:(:~, 7,};i2C: ..
------
" " .. ,
, ,'",
IF
,"!:
"
~'.:i ;{
,',
<:'" I
,,:,.'- '" .' . ,'".,.'
;~: I~' ;:/ F':', i;:,~
'if>!.:; ;, I': .L:~,.
'\-:1,') ;::,:. i;.,:.
,..'''_ '," ,c..;,,':j :" ,'. ,
I I I I
I I I I
I I , I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I !
~~:\:~..
I
I
I
I
I
I
....
I~"<'
----- , ,,"', n:,,' 't.", ,
:,,' t<'~' :.:,,', "," .:';...,;. : ',,',
c:ca.T
,..-.
II
::.' :':,'.;'
. '.~: i :'~
jd,'~';~':
',:'>,':';
;\~::"', "
'~
':; I
,
: ;' ':~ I
,'.'" " I
STllUT
;;~
',:
ITIIlUf
"'J
CMT
I1'lIaT
Figure A..4
SOUTHEAST
EXPANSION AREA
J ,
f .
y, "
;
~ ."~
,
~ .::
,
; ,
CHARTER STATEMENTS
-. '~1 \11'"' .. lIt ..AI'
,~ :;:
{ ~
,
, "
,
I: ':
IN
ACCESSIBLE
ECONOMIC CENTER
UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES
GOOD PLACE TO LIVE
; ,
; ,
LINKAGES
COURT/CHESTNUT STREETS
NEW URBAN PARK
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPERTY
1.>"..,:.::,,:;,"4
, > :'.;<"~'~.<;;,' J
KEY FEATURES
MIXTURE OF LAND USES
SOME ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
PRIORITY LAND USES
,
~ ..
RESIDENTIAUOFFICElRET AIL
, "
~ \
1.,';
PJlEPAAEO BY;
CL..EARWATER
PiANNJNG AND :DEVELOP.MENT DE~ARTNlENT
1992
,
i
r
1 '
.
~
~
i
i
('-
\
2
o
o
a:
<(
0.
<(~
)(0
_0
Q c
m~
0.-
0.0
<(2
w
f-
2
-
(
w
o
:;:)
I:
~
-
CI)
2
w
to-
:2
-
w
CIJ
~
Q W
2 Cl
:3 ~
Q c:c
w (,,)
CI) c::(
o
c..
o
IX
c..
~
-
CI)
2
w
t-
2
-
w
en
~
Q
2
c:t
...J
~
2
i=
en
><
w
~
a:
c:t
2
o
-
en
2
c:t
a.
><
w
>
....
-
en
2:
W
....
2:
-
lie
lie
Cl
2:
-
2:
o
N
~
,I, .
1'000
('i)LO~C\l
.q-I'M~
.................... "'" ...
<(<(N('I')
ll..ll..N('I')
::>::>~:t<(
OOO~~-
NLOOOZ
.... ... ... ... ....
~~~O>O
LOLOo:;f'O>.....
...- ~ ,..... .--
.... ... ... ... ....
CJ) ...JI-
w -(j)
0::: . <( ::> ~
(/')1-00:::
tj~~Z~
.... ... ... ... ....
*
>
!::
en
z
w
....
Z
-
o om
LO('i)OO om
CX)OLOCOLO('I').....!"'-ol'
o "OM..-"- co
,.- , 'MO><(oo-
LO M 00 LO ,0> a.. ~ <{
CX)Mq-..-O'>..-=>a..c.
- - - ....., -" - ....
LOLOLO~.:::i.LOLO=>..J
~~~~~f':c.OU')~
OOOOOONr-1'
... ... ... ... A ... .... ... ...
w
Cl
~
a:
(J
c::(
~
Z
-
2:
o
N
O~q-~OO"-LOoo~~
cv>.-~NM<DI'U')-(O
.- - -(0
... ... .... A A ... .... A ... ...
~COCOCX)~
0.. a: NN~,1-
.......... I. I .--
~CJ)~ZO:2~:20
:::!o..OUUUa:a:a:1-
... ... .... ... ... ... .... ... ... ...
I-
(j)
w
~
:c
I-
a:
o
z
C't)
.
(0
(0
...
~
o
LOO
1'0
'M
m ,
I'CO
N('i)
--
.q-M
00
... ....
r:co~
co . CO
.-Nr-
.... ... ...
-'
~
~...JO
UOI-
A .... ...
I-
CJ)
w
~
J:
l-
=>
o
CJ)
000
(OWC\l
M..;:tcx)
- ' ,
<(N<D
ll..LOLO
....-.-
...J__<(
O~~-
LO-OZ
... ... ... ...
NLONO~
~cv),....._co
....
... A ... ... ...
wI- ..J
U(/)~<(
cnL!5O::J-
~~Z~~
... .4 ... ... ...
000
1'0
- co
<('
0..0'>
::>~
oo~
NO
.... ...
OOLOC't)
.
N....~
.... ... ...
I:::
u
::>
W..J
. ~ ~
fBlto
a:0....
.... ... ...
o
O~LO
..rCON
..r 'CD
..'- ,
LONO
N-N
_ LO_
('i)COM
. . .
000
.... .4 ...
mcoCDC't)
. .
.....O..--~
... ... .... ...
..J
c.. t::
Z~...JO
Uc..Of-
... ... .... ...
I-
CJ)
<(
w
J:
I-
a:
o
z
o
..;:to
COo
--iN
COo
~qo
<O~~
o~~~
I'MOZ
... ... ... ...
('i)('i)<D0~
. .. ('I')
mcoo;;t.....C\l
... ... .4 ... ...
U
w
-
U
=>
W...J ..J
U- A'
'-<(~I-"'"
cnL1..l-a:
W L1..w <(0
a: 00::: 0.. I-
.... .... .4 ... ...
00
O'>COOO
-~LOO
, '1'0)
N N , ,
-I'COI'
-NCON
LO___
W~MM
. . . .
0000
... ... ... .4
~~.-_~
LO . . M
O_LON",
... ... .... .... ...
..J
C. t::
en~Z...JO
a:UUOI-
... ... .... ... ...
I-
en
<(
w
:c
l-
=>
o
en
tn
I-
Z
::I
u.
o
ci
z
>:
I-
(ii
Z
W
o
.
a:
o
~
u.
d
Ul
o
o
o
o'
~
u;
w
en
::I
~I
i
I
-.-
;:::
~
e
w
ll.
o
-l
W
>
W
e
w
cc
o
l-
e
w
~
::J
en
en
<(
en
~
u.
o
<t
u.
<.:l
o
Z
<t
(0)
ci
u.
o
a:
<t
u.
~
(,
o
o
o
~
(;)
?
-l
o
<.:l
~
w
U
u:
LL
o
e
w
I-
~
::::i
('f)
..-
~
a:
<t
a:
o
o
..J
U.
l:)
CI) ,
Ul ~
o e
a:-w
<.:lUll-
ot:u
-Zw
I-::I-l
~-l~
<!<enen
uJl-o<w
a: :>en
<1-:>::1
a:g~LL
OLO::IO
gc~~
~~cc::E
a:wci1o
Wa:oW
:I:ua:l-
!::<ll.~
W _
za:l-U
-:t~i=
o (/)""'z>-
wl-""'<(!::
Ul-w~(/)
Ulz:J:5z
~::JI-w~
o.O,-lz
)(LO~lt-
W(/)(/)a:w
W-::J Ul
S(,offi~
....Ow-I-
Ull:!!x152
~<i-l:)a:
1-00::EWl-
(ii::lClI-!!2
ZOZ()o
~~~wc:l
~ .Oen~
wc:i::1::1Z
Ulu.i<OO
::1_ wN
~~o
Z::EW
ow~
Nenll.
a:wo
O:J:a:
u.1-ll.
I
I
,
I
i
I
,
I
I
,
[
~
[film
15ffi
ZCJ
.
. .
('
\
'-"
00
00
~
<(
Z
<(
c:
>-
00
Z
W
f-
Z
W
00
=>
c:
LO 00
f-CO LO 00
rn~ "d' >-
VOl:::COI-<q, ...J
......::::: 0 Zr-- <(
I-CX)~NWLO Z
m>-...J~~>- ~~
COW O-a) wO:
~1""\>OOI""\ (f)W
O"......WW...J...... <(J:
OWO(/)WW WI-
..Jen...J<(>OO 0:0:
W<(<(WW<( U=>
>W_o:OW zu.
Wa:O:U...Ja:: -W
OUl-w-U W
.ZOOt""\<(Z 1-00
--=>'-'\-- I.U
<( ...J 0 ..J I.U ...J Z -,
r=~Z<(O:<( W~
ZI--r="1- ...J_
WZ"Z~Z~~OO?;
9w~wlJ..wu.enr:Eo
(/) I- - I- . I- - en I- ...J
~~~~g~g~2~
tJ)
-
tJ)
>-
....
<(
2
<(
~
-
tJ)
2
w
I-
2
-
,.....
co
....
....
..J
<(
r=
z
wen
91-
(/)-
wZ
o::=>
w
tJ)
::>
Q
w
tJ)
o
a..
o
a:
a..
A
>-
I-
-
tJ)
2
w
I-
2
-
('f)
,.....
('f)
..J
<(
i=
z
w
000
-I-
en-
wZ
o:=>
w
tJ)
::>
~
2
i=
tJ)
X
w
A
~
IX:
c(
2
o
-
tJ)
Z
c(
a..
><
w
I-
en
w
~
J:
I-
0:
o
Z
Ii:
..Jd
~(/)
0::0
1-0
3~
OLO
ZLO
-v
A
~ tL:
...J 0
<(.00
O:<(LO
I-Zc.o
~-"d'
- 0: '
~~~
_.:::::CO
A
o
V
('I)
...
N
N
('I)
...J .
<(tL:
tud
0:00
A
LO
en
CO
...
V
CO
N
...J"
~tL:
1-'
wO
a: 00
..
o 01-0
CO LOZ""
V ,,:woo
o Nl-m~c.O
COI-L02r--D..U')
I-MZ....WNg....
Z>~>-~~w>
woo..:::mO-r.u>oo
~Q~og@~o
OW...JwwOO...Jw
...Jenwen>~<(oo
w<(><(ww_<(
>wwwOa:O:w
wa::Oa:...JUI-CC
OUwU-w(/)U
...J2UZ~O=>2
<(....Ju:..Jw...J~....J
I-<(u..<(a:~_<(
21-01- ':-1- -:-1- -
~2ci)ZI-2\-2"'"
_wl-wlJ..wlJ..wu.
(/)1--1- -I- -I- -
w02000000
o:a..=>o..OOQ..(/)Q..(f)
o
(0
('t)
...J
<(
I-
2
w
000
-I-
en-
w2
0:::>
A
o
LO
r--
,
m
r--
N
...J -
<(G:
I- .
wd
0: en
A
I-
en
w
?;
:c
l-
=>
o
en
o
(0
v
...
N
LO
G:
...Jd
<(en
0::0
1-""
(/)00
::::> '
oc.o
ZLO
- ....
.....
w .
uti:
u.. .
u..d
Oen
A
..
o
o
('f)
,
CO
('I)
~t
u: -
u..d
Oen
A
en
-
en
>-
....
<(
Z
2<(
-0:
ww
en:!:
~~
cc::>
CJu..
Zw
-w
tuen
21
w~
..J_ .
co en 3:
(j)Zo
Cl)w...J
ol-w
a.~lXl
en
I-...J ~
2~ co
::::> I- .... I- '
co2 - ..-
l-r--wli:mN
Z>b .2~
~mo..dQ..
":::0 (/)00
o..wl-L(')...Jw
gen2N~en
w~~qw~
>~o.......Qa:
~UO>--JU
2 _I co <( OW
...J_W Z
<(...J~fao....J
l-~oCJ)t=~
2.... <( :::> I- _
~2w()WI-21-
......w o::-wlJ..
(j)1-U:U~l-o'
~~~~Z~CJ)
00
r--
...J
<(
....
2
w
oCJ)
-I-
CJ)-
w2
0:::::>
A
o
V
V
,
LO
N
...J "
-I-
~u.
.... .
wO
O:CJ)
A
I-
CJ)
~
w
J:
....
0:
o
.2
.
d
en
o
o
co
en
.....
w
U
u:.
~G:
....
LO
""
co
,
o
N
w'
uti:
U:.
u...d
Oen
....
.
fJ)
-
tJ)
>-
...J
<(
22
-<(
wa:
enw
~:J:
a:~
0::>
Wu.
Co
~2
Z ...
>-
...JI-
<(-
a:tJ)
wZ
Zw
wI-
~~
V
.....
...J
<(....
zLL.
0"
-0
I-CJ)
=>0
I-v
1-00
en '
Z.....
_N
A
t,:;'<
'," :
(
/"~
I '
{
'-~~
:n
a:
<t
2
o
-
tIJ
2
<t
a.
C' ~
.}"',.,{:
tIJ
-
tIJ
>
...
<t
2
<t
-J .....J .
... ~ ...: <( ti:
~ I-~LLi=
LO lL.ZO.Zd
~(O w w
2>- -Jd~CI)"'CI)
wen <((/)0000
~ i= a..0)0..q-
a.O...J20~or-...r-:
OWe:{ 0>., 'Zc.o
-JenZw~--O) LO
W~QbN~~~O
~a:~a.~a.. 0.......
OU::>~>-O>O>-
...JZ!::ZaJujOJirlaJ
<(..J~~O>O>O
i=~ZO:~~~~~
fii!z~g~=~W~
gw~wa:<(D:Uc:
en"'Z>u~(JU-U
~~::>~~~~~~
~
-
tIJ
2
w
I-
2
-
W
tIJ
::)
Q
w
tIJ
o
a.
o
a:
a.
o
.q-
c:o
.
.q-
co
o
.
~
U")
c.o
o
o
C\I
,
o
o
.....
.....
...J
<(
i=
2
wen
0...
en-
wZ
0::::>
~t
tud
D:(/)
~t
u: .
LLO
O(/)
A.
A.
.
>
I-
-
tIJ
2
w
I-
2
-
o
0)
(V)
,
0)
(V)
(V)
o
o
0)
.
......
C\I
...J
~t
O.
-0
t-(/)
::>0
t:o>
t-~
en ..
ZN
-.....
-JI-
<(lL.
I- .
wO
D:(/)
.
~t
i! .
LLO
O(/)
W
tIJ
::)
c:J
2
i=
tIJ
><
W
A.
A.
.
t-
en
<(
w
:r:
t-
.::>
o
en
'i\
.1"
;
; "
I."'
CfJ
Cii
~
Cl:
Z
ZCl:
-a:
ww
tn:J:
<Ct-
wa:
a:;:)
(.)u..
Zw
-w
t:iCfJ
~~
.... - .
~CfJ~
(iiZO
tnUJ..I
O~W
D._tO
':.
,:;.~i .":"'~'"
I;': :::'
r
t!>
;n
a:
<(
z
o
-
t!>
Z
<(
Q.
X
w
l-
t!>
W
3:
::J:
I-
:J
o
t!>
o
Z
<(
l-
t/)
(r:'~
, ',,,.,..: J:
I-
:J
o
t!>
..
l-
t!>
W
3:
::J:
I-
a:
o
z
C.:
, , '" < . f.~
t!>
-
t!>
>-
...
<(
Z
<(
a:
w
::J:
I-
a:
:J
u..
0') ~ N ('f)
l!) <0
:2 l!) N m "
0 ~ c.D , """
or- , <0 0) ~ , LO
- ~ ('f) 0
I- 0 00 CO ....
~ I '" 00 I 0)
I I '"
-oJ , - ...J ..
e::( -oJ 00 ~ <( ..J , 0
0:: ~ <{ N M
0 i= or- N i- N
-
Q. 2 r:x: I I 0 2 0: I I
UJ C} W I- ...J ..J W w i- -oJ ...J
:2 Z 0 (J) <( cd: CJ) 0 en <( ~
~ i= - ~ 1-... 0 ::> 1-1-
eni- 01- 1-1- a.. eni- Oi- 1-1-
I- en Wo 20 Wo 00 0 Wo ZO Wo Oc
>< CC<( -e::( O:e::( 1-<( 0: 0::<( -"<( CCe::( 1-<(
w ... ... ... ... a.. ... j. ... j.
0 (I) 0 CJ)
~ w 4: w
2U) W a: W - a:
0 2 U 0 Z u
Qw 'W <t I W <(
-oJW I ...JW I
1-- -oJ <( ..J e::(
~~ e::(2 It) <(Z 0r"-
e::( - . <{ - .
i=en 2 N I-Cf) Z 00
0:(.) ZW CC I I 0 ZW 0: I I
Q<C C} wO: I- ...J -oJ W wO: ~ -oJ ..J
1JJu. Z OU en ~ Cf) oU en - cd:
0: i= -<( ~ <( 0 -<{ ::> <( I-
en 0 i- a.. en 0 I-
en WLO Z W 0 0 w..- Z UJ 0
>< CC' 0:: I- 0:: . r:x: l-
N - 0: co -
w ... ... j. ... a.. ... j. ... ...
...
o:Z I ,
-oJ I ...JO '0
WW ....10 0 c
I-:E ~O <(a.. ..Ja..
<(0- 0 Q. ~~ 0 D..
cd:'" 1-0. -C) 0- e" I-~ 0- C:J
~~ 2('!) r:x: 'C) I 0 ZC") 0:C") IC) '0
C} W 1-0 :::!O ..Jr W W<o ~C") :::!~ ..J(\')
a: Z 0..... eno cd: " CJ) en",
... i= -0 ~N <(r--- I-C'! 0 OC") ::> <(M .:~
en" o - I-q- en ' O~ I-N
en W ~ Z~ W ~ 0" a.. w<O W ' 00
>< CC('f) 0:c.D I-('t) 0 0::<0 ZC") a:N I-(\')
00 -N N ('t) a:: N -C") M CD
W ... ... ... ... a.. j. ... j. ...
<0
co <0 ('f)
N or- or-
'" q- , "
~ q- ~ 0 0
co , CD ~ ,
... '" oc::t en N or- it)
wZ r--- CD LO or- M
en 0) ..-
e"W I '" , ..
I .. I ..- 0')
cd::E -oJ .. 0 ...J ,
-oJ en ..J 'l::t ....
~... <( " <( M
w~ i= <( ..- .... i- <{ N
2 a: I 0 Z 0: , I
UJa: I- , ~
C} W ...J ..J W W -oJ ...J
... Z 0 en <( cd: Cf) 0 en cd:
- ~ 0 ::> <(
i= CJ'Jo 00 1-0 "'0 a.. enO 00 ""'0 I-Q
en wa. ZO- Wo- OQ. 0 wa.. za.. Wo- OD..
>< a:(.!) -C) O:C) I-e" a: o::~ -~ CCC) I-C:J
w ... ... ... ... a.. j. j. ... ...
2
0
Ci)~ I-
2a: en
w
~<C ~
~ J: r
l-
e:: -
0
Z
;
HI
I
j
I
'I
j
~l
I
I
co'
"""
:,"
,'.
i
z
0
-
to- -I
t:!: I <{
I
..J -I Z
0: t- <! <{t- O t- t-
O 0 -f- f- I- t-t- 0 C
a. I ~ I t- I 0 ~o I 0 a:o ,0 ::::>0 I e::( 'I- I -:t
U) C!) =OWO...lN W We::( We::( I-~ ...1<( C) t-e::( :::!LO Wo ...I'd"
Z 2 <(~Ue::(~~ CJ) 01.0 Uex:> en <((0 Z <{ex:> Ue::( -:ten
~ 0 ::::>M t-eo
I- tu"':.~NO~ 0- eno L1.N Om I-N t- cn.q- t-m ~M t-I.t)
en WI.C) L1.1.C) zq O~ (j) W ' o '
... a:mOo....o 0 0: , o "- ... .. z ~ a:M oeo t-'d"
- -
X r- eo N a: r- N ~ 10 >< I N .q- N
w A A ... a.. J. J. J. ... W J. ... ... J.
0 <(
ZCfJ w - .
0 2 U -I
2w I W -:t <{
W I
...- <( <( ~ ..J <{ Z <{ ~ -:t
~~ <(Z -I 'd"
- - - <( 0 - - -
Z Z 2: ~CJ) Z N Z Z 2:
O:U I I 0 Zw I a: t- I I ,
I l- I ::::>
fd~ C!) ...J W ...I W wa: W ...I C) t- -I W ...I
2 U ~ CJ) OU U en -:t Z U -:t
0: <( 0 -e::( ::> t-<( <{
i= I- u: 0- en L1. Cl t- t- t- L1. t-
en W u.. 0 Wv L1. 0 (j) cn_ W L1. 0
- a: 0 .... 0 0: . 0 2 t- Z2 a: 0 t-
X a: N - >< -
I
W ... ... ... 0- J. J. ... ... W J. ... ... ...
0 Cl
0- 0..
... C) ~
-I
0:2 0 I <{ e
('t') ..J I m
WW eo -I 0 Z "
...~ 0 , C <!O 0 <(0 a.. 00 0 , Q
<(t- o. ('t') CL. 1-0.. 0- -a. 0 -a. a.. N Q.
3:~ I C) I Ie;) 0 Ze" I C) a:C!) '0 5C!) I C) I 'C:J
C!) =LO W ...ILl') W Wv Weo t- C) :::!m W ...10)
a: cne ...Iv t-o
t- 2 <(~ U ~o CJ) o ex:> ~v :::>~ ~~ Z t-O e::(('t') U ~N
I- I-m i! 0 en~ L1.N O~ t- t-m LL
en W .. L1. oct? a.. W ' L1. .. Ov en cnr:. W ' LL OO-l
a:~ 0 t-- 0 0:0 OLO 200 ...1"'- Z~ a:('t') 0 t-"
X -~ >< -
N M a: ex:> ,- ~ I ('t') (V')
W 10, ... ... 0- J. ... ... ... W J. ... 10, ...
0 C 0 C
a. C- O Q.
t- o.. c:J " a. 0
e" "
w2: 0 -I (,0 I.t)
OW LO 'd" I <{ ex> "" CO
<(~ r- U) ..J I ('t') ex> M
~ - <(0 -I 0 Z , 0 ..
3:t- 0 , C") 0 ~O a.. 0 LO , CO
w~ a. N N 1- a.. a. -a. 0 t-O N N N
U)a: , C) I I 0 Ze" I C) O:C!) I ::::>a. I I ,
C!) =I.C) W ...I W wN Wv t- ...I~ C) -I W ...I
t- 2 U ~ CJ) cnLO <(LC') Z I-C!) - U ~
~N QI.C) Uo :::>m ~N <{
I- tuq u: 0 eno L1.v O~ ...q l- I- i!
en L1. 0 0- W ' L1. .. OM (j) cn,- W L1. 0
a:o 0 t- O o:v 0'- 2~ 1-0 Zm a: 0 t-
X N a: "" ,- ,- ~ >< I
W 10, ... ... 0- J. ... ... ... w ... ... ... A
Z
0
Cii~ l- I-
Za: en CJ)
W
~-:t ~ ~
w
>< J: J:
w l- I-
::> ::::>
0 0
en CJ)
r
/"
,
,
"
,
\~
~
~
i
I
I
I
, I
, ' , ,', ,. . , , '. /"", ' ',' ,
e~
.;
/
I
'-..
Z
0
i= .
;:5 -J
a: <t ..... ...
0 -..... I- 0 C
c. 0 ~O '0 '<( .e:(
UJ w W<( =<( W,...., ....0)
Z CJ) 0..... <t..... U.-- e:(or-
e:( 0 CJ)C\I .....00 u..N "'0
a: a. w,...., WO u.. - o -
... 0 a: - a: . OLO ...It)
0: C\I ,...., .-- N
a. A ... ... ...
0
ZU) w .
0 0
Qw · w c:(
...- -JW <( <t: ~
~~ <tZ - -
I-en Z z ~
a:(.) 0 ZW I I I
frl~ w wO: -J W ..J
CJ) OU <( U c:(
a: 0 -<:( ...
a. CJ) I- u..
W~ W u.. 0
0 0: . 0: 0 ....
0: ~
a. ... ... ... .6.
...
a:r5 .
W:2 -JO 0 C
...... <(a. 0 a.. c.
~~ I-(!J a.. ~ C)
0 Z"'f '~ I '0)
W Woo =0 W"'f ..J(O
a: CJ) 90 uc.o ~~
... 0 <t:C\I -~
CJ)' .....0 u.. -
a.. w(O W . u..OO O~
0 a:"'f 0:0 00 ...(0
a: ..... ..... .-- N
a. A ... ... A
0
0 c..
... 0.. ~
wZ (9 .....
OW . LO M
e:(:2 -JO en ..-
<Q- . C
~... <to.. , .- c.
w~ I-(!J ,...., 00 ~
0 Z..... I I I
UJa: w W -J W ..JI"-
... CJ) 0"'" - U <(M
0 -0) <t: ...Ul
CJ)- ..... u.
a. WC"l w u. ON
0 a:(Y) 0: 0 ...N
a: ..... N
a. A 4 ... ...
Z
0
Cii~ ....
Za: CJ)
~c:( <:(
W
X :r:
w ....
::>
0
CJ)
(9 "Z >- t9""CJ) t9 .. "00
zOom ZOZW zOZW
_t9-0 -<90..... -(!JO.....
I-~....W .....~....- I-~....-
~o<(r- 00 -J en -J
-0<(- -0<(-
>< ..... <t: >< ..... u >< ..... u
wooO:C,9 WCOo:<t LiJOOo:<(
>-60- >-oou.. >-oou.
co . c.. .... co"":fuz cor'fuz
r--.en-
o....z~ O....zO Ol-ZO
w<:(<t:en W<(<(..... W<(<t:.....
I- o:w ~<90:<( .....(!JO:<(
<(t9........ ozl-w <(z....UJ
OZZ- o_zO:
- .....I -zO:
0....0- 0.... u 0.... u
2<t:....u ~<(ow 2<(ow
2ffiui:t 20::1-0: 20:1-0:
oa..<t:z O~~u. O~~u.
uoo..o uoo..o uoo..o
u ~- uw~: Uen2:
<((1)-.... <(--CJ) <(--00
-O<t: woo::> woo::>
WOww
cozeno: cozw-J cozw-J
en a.. en a..
z<t:<(u z<(<t:o: z<(<(o:
<(o~~ <(oW::> <(oW::>
Ut9Uz U<9O:CJ) u(!JO:oo
~ U: ~ U:
~~ZO 00 W en W
woOt9 woOt9
u~':'::"" U . "Z U . "Z
-oou -0-- -0--
~ .-- C,9 <t: . >.-01- >.....01-
Wu.~o..LU 0: C)CJ) O:u.C)oo
wu.2- w02X
(J)oo~Q eno >< 00 W
0:>-<ci.:.::5 OW o:>~
0:)- .
WI-.--: >- W .... <0 . Wl-<O .
~u....;ol- $-'-~ $-'-~
u 0: U 0:
~<t:<(,U w<(l-<( w<(l-<(
OOa..<t:a.. 000.. <(a..
o~~~ffi O<(C)Z o<(C)z
zu.........Ii= zu~<( ZUZ<(
<((I)<t:r-::J <(w....co <(enl-co
o:~o:mu 0:<(<(0: 0:<(<(0:
W W <( w:ro:::> w:I:O:::> 00
1-1-0..0: .........~o W
.........0.0 .--
<(zoO:u. <(zow <(zow
~<:(~B~ $<(enoo $<(enoo
.....I - z-.J-o -J-o
zo.owi= 0..00.. zo.oa..
o....z::><( o....zo Of-ZO
(J)Z<t:ZLU ooz<(o: ooZ<(a:
I-Wowo: .....woo.. .....woo..
~~C)~~ u~C)>- u~C)>-
o.~~zO: ~~2CO <(f-2OJ
0..<(
2UJ~0U. 2~~0 2w~o
-0:0)(/)0 ....O)w -Q:O)UJ
...J .... .- - - .....J ..... ~_ .....Jf-.--.....
<(wu.~Cn <(wu.<( <(Wu.<(
i=t9O<t:3 .....<90t9 -(!J0t9
.....<( -
z<:(>-:co. z<(>-I- z >-1-
~s"" .0: <(~I-- <(51--
(J)wut::> I-w-2 .....w-2
oowU OOCJ)~oo
(1)<( en co . <( CJ)
co '0..:I:= OJ.
. . ::>....<(....(!J ::>....o..w ::>f-o..~
en (J)(I)uO:z oow<(i= 00 en <(I-
- '.....1 0- I-.JU::J ,-JU:J
en <(-Jenzf- Lij-.Jen- ~-Jenu
> w<:(<t:z~ <(<(u <:(<(
a::r:c<( a::I::C<(
...J a::::r::cox <((J)....u. CJ) u..
<((I).... W
<t z~zo ' 20::zz <(o:~z
2 <t:w~ 0<(<(0 2<:(<(0
Q~.....I""O: _~...JI- O~.....I-
<t U)-o..<t:<:( CI)-o. --0.1-
Z >-....0 0. 2>-....<( ~>r-~
U. <(....ZOz <(I-Zw <(f-Zo:
Q.-wO:
0 a.uw~<:( ><U2~ Q.(Jwu
~<:(~~al w~....o: ><<:(2UJ
en ....~~8~ wn.....a:
I-<(<(z "'<:(<(z
I- ~U~uo Cl)UW Cl)U~o .
w a: 0 .
....I ~CJ)....<t:~ ~(J) W ~CJ) w
:J ::>.........9 ::>....1-0
~3ffi~0 i=it~~~ 5~~~~
en a..... a.
W a:: 0: <(zo :::llr:<(Q..f-
a: o::>s<to: 0::>~2- o:::>~~-
ZCJ) Uo. CI)(J) _(J Cl)CJ) _u
c'
I".
\. ' ,
~,
'>j "j;
, ," ,
.. ;.i
~.,..
..., ,,>. ~
APPENDIX B
PROPOSED "PERFORMANCE ZONING" DISTRICT
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING
TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING CHAPTER 40
CREATING NEW DIVISION 23A TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN/MIXED
USE DISTRICT; AMENDING SECTION 41.053, CODE OF ORDINANCES,
TO ESTABLISH SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS
FOR CONDITIONAL USES PROVIDED IN THE DOWNTOWN/MIXED USE
DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Chapter 40, Code of Ordinances, is amended by the creation of new Division 23A
as follows:
Division 23A. Downtown/Mixed Use ID/MU)
Sec. 40.471. General description.
This performance-based zoning district is created to promote redevelopment of existing commercial and
mixed use areas proximate to downtown Clearwater.
Sec. 40.472. Establishment/contraction.
It is intended that four acres or more be provided to establish a new downtown/mixed use district and
that no existing downtown/mixed use district be contracted to an area of less than four acres, unless
the city commission by ordinance determines that a reduced area is in the public interest.
Sec. 40.473. Permitted uses.
Within downtown/mixed use districts, only the following uses (and structures designed to serve such
uses) shall be permitted:
(1) Multiple family dwellings.
(2) Indoor retail sales.
(3) Restaurants.
(4) Business/professional offices.
(5) Medical clinics/laboratories.
(6) Nonprofit social or community services.
(7) Commercial or trade schools. .
(8) Accessory dwellings.
(9) Interval ownership and timeshare dwellings.
(10) Remote switching stations.
(11) Art galleries/studios.
(12) Funeral 'homes.
(13) Hotels/motels.
(14) Accessory uses.
Sec. 40.474. Conditional uses.
Within downtown/mixed use districts, the following uses may be permitted as conditional uses:
(1 )
(2)'
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Indoor storage and/or warehousing.
Alcoholic beverage sales (consumption on premises).
Alcoholic beverage sales (packages sales).
Transportation stations.
Veterinary offices.
Wh 01 esa Iin g/ distributi n g.
Marina facilities.
19
. . ,". . ". ',....-
,,',', ..~.~.'. \",
(8)
(9)
(10)
Residential shelters.
Noncommercial parking.
Manufacturing uses (including research facilities and laboratories, photographic processing
facilities, printing and publishing facilities, production of confectionery or baked goods, and
assembly of electronic components and precision instruments).
Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or storage.
Child day care.
Business services.
Personal services.
Gasoline stations.
f"'
1
(11 )
(12)
(13)
(14)
(1 5)
Sec. 40.475. Use limitations.
(1) All alcoholic beverage sales shall comply with the provisions of section 41.071 and chapter 6.
(2) Accessory uses shall comply with section 41 .121 .
(3) Marina facilities shall be located only on waterfront property where conditional use approval for
a commercial marina has been obtained for such property.
(4) No operations or activities associated with any permitted use shall be conducted outside any
enclosed structures unless specifically permitted as a conditional use.
(5) Any emissions into the atmosphere associated with any use shall be odorless and colorless, and
pose no risk to the health and safety of persons in the vicinity of the use.
(6) All uses, whether permitted, conditional or nonconforming, shall be conducted in compliance
with the use standards contained in sections 42.22, 42.31, 41.32, and 42.85.
(7) For properties west of Osceola Avenue, indoor retail sales, restaurants, business/professional
offices, medical clinics/laboratories, nonprofit social or community services, commercial or trade
schools, accessory dwellings, remote switching stations, and art galleries/studios uses shall only
be allowed as accessory uses to multiple family residential. uses containing a minimum of 100
dwelling units.
Sec. 40.476. Dimensional and numerical development requirements.
The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within
(' downtown/mixed use districts:
\-......'
(1) Maximum density:
a. 25 dwelling units or 40 hotel/motel units per gross acre for properties containing less
than two acres.
b. 50 dwelling units or 80 hotel/motel units per gross acre for properties containing two
or more acres.
(2) Minimum lot area:
a. For multiple family, hotel/motel, outdoor storage and manufacturing uses: 30,000
square feet.
b. For other uses: 7,500 square feet.
(3) Minimum lot width at setback line: 75 feet.
(4) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet.
(5) Minimum setbacks: Structures shall be afforded setbacks which measure not less than
hereinafter referenced nor less than any higher standard which may be applicable to a particular
property in accordance with the uniform development regulations contained in chapter 136.
a. Principal and accessory structures:
1 . From a street right-of-way: Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have
a required setback of 10 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet
shall have a required setback equal to 20 feet plus 25 per cent of the height of
the structure above 20 feet, up to a maximum required setback of 35 feet.
{
\
.....-,'
20
. I , " ..' , . " " : ' .' . .
(~.
/"':""
I .
"
..........'
{'
'......"
2.
From a side or rear property line: Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall
have a required setback of 1 0 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20
feet shall have a required setback equal to 1 0 feet plus 25 per cent of the height
of the structure above 20 feet, up to a maximum required setback of 35 feet.
From an adjoining residential zoning district (side and rear property lines only):
Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have a required setback of 20
feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet shall have a required setback
equal to 30 feet.
3.
b. Reserved.
(6) Maximum height:
a. For hotel/motel and residential uses -
1. For properties east of Osceola Avenue. 120 feet, except that such height
limitation shall, where applicable, be increased or reduced in accord with the
height bonus provisions, airport restrictions, and other regulations contained in
section 42.23.
2. For properties west of Osceola Avenue - 80 feet, except that such height
limitation shall, where applicable, be increased or reduced in accord with the
height bonus provisions, airport restrictions, and other regulations contained in
section 42.23.
b. For office uses - 60 feet, except that such height limitation shall, where applicable, be
increased or reduced in accord with the height bonus provisions, airport restrictions, and
other regulations contained in section 42.23.
c. For other uses - 35 feet, except that such height limitation shall, where applicable, be
increased or reduced in accord with the height bonus provisions, airport restrictions, and
other regulations contained in section 42.23.
(7)
Minimum open space:
a. For the lot: 25 per cent of the lot area.
b. For the front yard: 50 per cent of the front yard area.
(8) Maximum floor area ratio: 1.0.
(9) Minimum building separation distance within a development: Each building within a
development shall be separated from each other building within the same development by a
distance equal to 40 per cent of the sum of the heights of such two adjacent buildings, but in
no case shall the separation distance be less than 20 feet.
(10) Maximum building coverage: 50 per cent.
Section 2. Section 41.053, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 41 .053. Supplementary standards by category of use.
, .
..
+
..
+
+
..
+
(6) Child day care centers may be permitted within the limited office, general office, neighborhood
commercial, commercial center, downtown/mixed use, public/semipublic, limited industrial, and
research, development and office park districts subject to the following:
a, Sufficient on-site outdoor play areas shall be provided and so designed as to ensure user
safety.
21
l . ,. , ~. . , . . ' . . . , ' . . . . ~ ." '. ,,' ." . .; , ~ ,.... .
b. Appropriate on-site loading and unloading areas shall be provided which are sufficiently
dista nt from other trafficways so as to ensure user safety.
c. Within the research, development and office park and limited industrial districts, the use
shall be ancillary to another permitted or conditional use or shall provide, as its primary
purpose, service to a property containing another permitted or conditional use in the
applicable district,
d. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41 .052.
i
~
I
~
1
~
I
+
+
..
+
*
+
+
(13)
Indoor storage and/or warehousing may be permitted within the general commercial,
downtown/mixed use, and highway commercial districts upon determination that:
'~
i
fl
:~t
b.
The building size, length and appearance shall be compatible and in scale with other
buildings in the immediate area.
All doors shall be oriented so as to be least visible from public rights-of-way and
surround ing properties.
The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in preceding paragraph
(b) .
a.
c.
+
+
..
*
*
+
oil-
(17) Manufacturing uses may be provided in the downtown/mixed use and, research, development
and office park district~ upon determination that:
a. The hours of operation are compatible with surrounding uses;
b. The volume of traffic generated by the use is compatible with surrounding uses;
c. Any noise generated by the use is compatible with surrounding uses; aM
!L. In downtown/mixed use districts, a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet shall be
provided for the use; and
ga, The use complies with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052,
+
+
..
+
+
+
+
(18) Marina facilities may be permitted, except as provided in this section, in the beach commercial,
resort commercial 24 and 28, general commercial, downtown/mixed use, research, development
and office park, and public/semi-public districts, subject to the following:
a. Marina facilities are prohibited from locating in the following areas, which have been
identified as areas of high or moderate environmental significance: The north end of
Clearwater Beach, Clearwater Harbor grass beds, Cooper's Point, Clearwater Harbor
spoil islands, Sand Key Park, and the southern edge of Alligator Lake.
b. All proposed activities including, but not limited to, fueling, pumping-out, chartering,
living-aboard, launching, dry storage, and the servicing of boats, motors, and related
marine equipment, shall require specific approval by the planning and zoning board in
order to be permitted,
c. A commercial marina facility operated as a primary use shall not be located adjacent to
a residential district unless the owner provides screening or landscape buffering in
accordance with section 42.27. For marina facilities located adjacent to residential
districts, no fueling or launching facilities shall be located within 20 feet of the
residential property line, and no fueling or servicing of boats shall occur at such marinas
atter 9:00 p.m. or before 6:00 a.m.
d. No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump~out station holding tank shall be located over
water.
e. The marina facility shall pose no hazard or obstruction to navigation, as determined by
the city harbormaster. ,
f. View corridors shall be preserved across the property in accordance with the standards
set forth in section 41. 131 .
g. The use shall not adversely affect the environment, including both on-shore and off-
shore natural resources.
~,.
22
"', ..., , (;. " '..: ' '.. .~ . ,', , .,' .' , : , ' ,.'.. .,' .' , ,
h,
I.
J.
k.
t
~ I.
&
~ m.
..
The owner shall provide evidence to the Public Works Department of sufficient and
acceptable wastewater treatment to serve the project.
For coastal areas, the owner shall provide to the City an acceptable Manatee Protection
Plan. Appropriate speed zone signs shall be posted to control boat speed for manatee
protection,
The owner shall provide evidence of adequate spill containment areas on the subject
property.
Landside sanitary facilities or a sanitary pump-out station shall be provided, and shall be
available to marina users 24 hours a day.
The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
In the event of conflict between these standards and federal or state law or rules, the
federal or state law or rules shall apply to the -extent that these standards have been
preempted. Otherwise, the more stringent regulations shall apply.
..
..
..
..
..
+
(20) Noncommercial parking may be permitted within the residential, limited office, general office,
neighborhood commercial, North Greenwood commercial, downtown/mixed use, highway
commercial, and limited industrial districts upon determination that:
a,
..
(,',
<
I'
!
~
l
1i
b.
c,
d,
e.
f.
g.
h.
I
.1
~
;
~
Single-family residential property may be used for noncommercial parking only when
such parking is accessory to a primary use in an adjoining public/semipublic district.
However, such parking on single-family residential property shall not be used for any
portion of the off-street parking required by this code; such parking shall be provided
only for excess or overflow parking; the parking lot shall not be surfaced; access directly
from the street or from adjoining residential property shall not be provided to a parking
lot located on single-family residential property; the area, lot width and lot depth of
single-family residential property used for noncommercial parking shall not be considered
in determining whether the adjoining public/semipublic property meets the applicable
dimensional and numerical development requirements; and a conditional use for parking
on single-family residential property shall not run with the land, but shall expire upon a
change of use of the adjoining public/semipublic property.
The parking lot shall be designed, surfaced and landscaped in accord with all applicable
requirements contained in this development code; however, surfacing shall be prohibited
on single-family residential property.
Access to the parking lot shall not be provided directly from the street or from any
residentially zoned property adjoining the property which is the subject of the conditional
use application, unless specifically authorized by the planning and zoning board;
however, access directly from the street or from adjoining residential property shall not
be provided to a parking lot located on single-family residential property.
The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
Noncommercial parking lots which adjoin residentially zoned property shall be provided
with an opaque fence or wall along all property lines adjoining the residentially zoned
property, and may be used for the parking of motor vehicles other than recreation4J1
vehicles, semi-trailer trucks or cabs, commercial vehicles, buses, or vehicles designed
to transport wastes or hazardous or noxious materials, which are prohibited. Such lots
shall not be used for the parking of trailers, boats or boat trailers. Any lighting of said
parking lot shall not exceed the height of the opaque fence or wall required along all
property lines. However, a parking lot which adjoins single-family residential property
shall be provided with a landscaped strip of land not less than ten feet in width along
all property lines adjoining the single-family residential property, and any lighting shall
not exceed six feet in height and shall be screened at all times from off-premises view
from the single-family residential property by landscape materials.
No portion of any parking space shall be closer than ten feet from the property line of
any adjoining single-family residential property.
All applicable requirements of section 41.221 and section 42.27 shall be satisfied
without the granting of any variance therefrom.
Such parking shall not be required by this code to serve another use.
23
l}
"
l
\-.
f,'
i
~
"
~
'..
"
i. If the parking is provided on property zoned for multiple-family residential or
nonresidential uses, such parking shall be guaranteed to remain available through a long-
term lease or other appropriate instrument running with the land for a term equalling or
exceeding the projected life of the use which the parking is to serve.
*
*
+
+
+
+
+
(23) Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or storage may be permitted within the general commercial,
highway commercial. commercial center downtown/mixed use. and limited industrial districts
upon determination that:
a.
The outdoor use shall not adversely affect the community appearance objectives of the
city. In particular, no temporary buildings, portable buildings, tents, stands, trailers,
vending carts or like buildings or structures shall be utilized in conjunction with the use.
In downtown/mixed use districts, outdoor storaae, sales and displavs of boats and
motor vehicles shall be prohibited.
In downtown/mixed use districts. a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet shall be
provided for this use.
The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in preceding section,
b.
~
db.
*
+
+
+
+
+
+
(27) Residential shelters may be permitted within the multifamily residential districts, and the limited
office, neighborhood commercial, general commercial. downtown/mixed use. highway
commercial, limited industrial, research, development and office park and public/semipublic
districts upon determination that the use complies with all of the general standards contained
in section 41.052.
*
*
+
+
+
+
+
(29)
Transportation stations may be permitted within the general commercial, downtown/mixed use,
highway commercial, and public/semipublic districts and the bayfront subdistrict of the urban
center district upon determination that the use complies with all of the general standards
contained in section 41.052.
(30)
Vehicle service may be permitted within the beach commercial, general commercial,
downtown/mixed use. highway commercial, commercial center and limited industrial districts,
upon determination that:
a. All service bays shall be located within an enclosed building and all servicing shall be
conducted indoors.
b. Entrances to any service bays shall be appropriately oriented with respect to adjoining
uses.
c. All used tires, parts, and similar objects shall be stored in a building or other enclosed
structure.
d. Careful distinction shall be drawn by the board with regard to the type of service to be
performed. Major repairs, including engine or transmission dismantling, painting, body,
fender, muffler, top and upholstery work shall not be allowed unless specifically
permitted by the board.
e. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
(31) Veterinary offices may be permitted with the limited office, general office, general commercial,
downtown/mixed use, highway commercial, neighborhood commercial, and beach commercial
districts upon determination that:
a. All activities shall be conducted within soundproof, air conditioned buildings with no
outdoor cages, runs or other outdoor facilities unless determined by the planning and
zoning board that such facilities are located and screened in a manner so as to not
adversely affect the use, enjoyment or valu~ of surrounding properties.
b. There shall be no overnight boarding of animals unless determined by the board that
such boarding facilities are sufficiently soundproofed, air conditioned and are made
available only to animals requiring veterinary treatment.
24
'.'
" :';:
c
(-"
"
",-,~..
(:'j
~~
," ,.
!',
.-
" '
J, "
,- '."
;::i
I' ......:,.,:
,..' ~ ~ 1 .,..'
c.
The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
')
I
..
+
':!
:,
+
..
+
+
+
(33).. Wholesaling/distributing facilities may be permitted within the general commercial
downtown/mixed use. and highway commercial districts upon determination that:
j
, I
" ,:"!
I
I
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
a. The size, mass and scale of any structure used for such activity is compatible with
surrounding structures.
.!h The proDosed access, site desian. and vehicles used in the operation are compatible
with surroundinQ uses.
Q6. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
Section 3. The provisions of this ordinance have been found to be consistent with the City of '
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
Rita Garvey
. Mayor-Commissioner
Attest: .'
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Approved as to form and correctness:
M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
City Attorney
25
:;',.., ',;' , ",
!:~:' ,1~"~f~~~;
, .j,~,
c..
;c';,
:;,C,
~,/
~~:
\~~. .
~
\;~.:~,i;
'~,
6,""
., ~ " I
" ': >
',f .
"
~,t "
rt-':
(0
";! :,
,
:' ", ,:'J, ", ! '''''':,'',' ,
'. . ., ~ ..'." : - . .
, ,~ . ;,: <<\ : :,;.
,.. ':1'1' .' ~ <t'~
"
'.. , :,),,:,:, .', ":':","'.' i ',i" ':
, ;,,~~
,:', ,~;;' ", ~fq~
' J, .~ ~,~~~;m~
? ~. ,~'~~.
, "
\ ~
",', ." ';
": ":' ,:';:'" '
" '
," .""""
"
"
, fo-. ;
.. ,.
.' ~~i'
, ,;:..:;~f.
; r)
f .,' ~.;:
'.5' ,;~,,>::;.,,:. '
"
,
, ' ~
?,.',...
f!' . -l._ Jik: ".
, ,: :.:r,' .' ';; 'J\, //; >.' :\i:,:;"':;::,~ '.',"~'
.~ . :.'~..'~<:' . ~.. <':,~~;:';:':,':~""""~ .',",~'.: ':", I
. "'; ',' : :~.: ,',(, :. ;:';: . f";);~ ).;',;:{in'; : "
, .' ,',i':, ".1;. ';\~ '," ~
.. " , ,e, ;;,',.. ,,~,
"J:;(~,i:?:',':';i, ',. "'l'/\ ',,'
',..,';,i,"" <,"li "",~\"'..;,,
, :;/,,;," if.:';,,?');:,: "
'" c ,,>> ., ';"t 3E~:; ~: '..,' '. '. ,
, " ',.' J. . ::' ,..~i'. if.::' :"_' i>._";~ " :, .
, ;: :~/ \ ,:.'," . ;;;;:;, ~!;;?: ",:,;'{ f ,: "
: .' ";, ,..",< ,I, . ',' .~:;': .. " 'I' . , ,,'
"',' ,<1 , ,'~" t:~~~:'r~:_t. .~.'~~:',~;~\I~~;F'~. ~.:: :','
" " ..." 7~c ",",:', .., ,,'.
" .:' :: ':: ":,~ ;i,:,;~};<;,~ ~,,';", ",\ .,},:: ' '.:-.'
"',, ,', -:',:.. ,:,.....,'" I ,:"',::" ," ',:,' ,,'
.' ',' . :., .'.;.: F' . ", '. "
,,,.~:,.. ,',,' <<. ',', ;:: ,,;..:,.' " ':~ .';"".., ... ~ .,/.'"
f" ".;
,:,
<,','
'., ,'S,:
(, ~
," ,.
::1 .. (',~:;\U~';t,~',
, :;;' ,: "
"!
'5
::.
:::
..' ."
,_ J ; "
"'"
0\
"...
:'
,',
j
~ J,.' ~, ",
, ..
,
,."",' ',;."",,',,,,;,'
," .. " "" .", ,~, ',',,;.
,\\
,;,'
"-1
'j
:':'A
.,',
';<~
'.J;','
APPENDIX C
URBAN CENTER ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENTS
, "
.. ,
, :';;,:1
.:"j
, : ,.:1
',':;'
:"...:
,+
. ~, ' ~')'
::,
:".
'~,T
, ~,.~:;
>:',<
. ,,';:,
: .
~ ~'
, :.:;
'.
.~ ;:J:
, :,. " ~.~;;
.,
: "
..'::'
,,'
'. ,. : ,';. ~';':ii'
~~
:. :::~
. ;...
': ?7i:
:'?
'-:~':.:'i~~
." .. ,\ >", ~ . >: ..i
. .,' ", ::':,\~i;2
.. >' H "'lrt
, .. ," " ,',,,~)~
'/\:c:~:'" "':','
,', '.:;, ,,\' "'/' ,.. ",.,.'
,7,;'c:::," . ..;',',,;
.: : ,':,;::'::;~. e'" ..' , ";,~
' "::,":"',',:;:, ,'.;' , ' , '~"
: ' .: ")),:;t;:t:I(!;\:..:~:~L::/ ,; : ..;:. >,~\
>: ,,' ,..;",:
:,.::,..' ,:, ' , . .', ,,::,i:,::,. '-:.:; ", :', ' . ,'. ., '<:~',
,{~(;:' ,,''"'' ' " .' :::~::~,:;:x,;:, '''''', ,'!
.. :( ,< . ..'>.d.:!( ";'1
, .. '.~,;>" " ..,." ,; i':'i '.:" ,
'" . ';::,. ", :;'u~\C:, ,i '. . ;"";,',' :'\':'~}..
; . :(;; :<', ' ",." :,"'" '; <:, "'.. '.;';' '; ;'. :.<'.': ;:';:,;:): :',:;:,~<;';~::,D ;~:":":\;/'.,:,::,:.;~"~:
.. . ,:/''', ",: ,," ",,':".',:.,:'\"':':, .,>",' ',C:) ".:1,\:./::;':-:"'.:.: t,~{1
" >>, '/:,:';.; .,' ,'~:i:.:> . " ,;,;' :'.', :"" ",. ;.:,,',, ,,,.y:: ".: ,:;;'
. ",::;::>. "'iC,/.':,,' ";, .,.',:;:,.... ,i,;,:'!,:;,;}; ;',>."'):',,:;:
, . ,,:)\., . ,.,".' :{~.':, >> .. ','. ,'.' ,"";,::::,',:, \"; ,;1:: :,:y:
i,y, ;"', '.;:,; , ':\~{ ., . '; ,', ,'~.;'/: ,'C,.',:."';""''.''-'
, " , " '. .. .'.. ';. ' ,,' .,". .,.; ,'.\;:'n.;,. '.' ,;,. .:'..' ',;"",,:,6j,:;;~:,:.',;.;::;,: ,:,:::",:,::;.:.,~ Ut:/:
,.' ,... ,'. " ..,.. ).';' , . ".",:}X;{';':i',. :}:'::',Nll
" " .. .." "" "";, ,.::,,".",....' ':..",:, i,,"";" ..' , "':",,:, "',i";:':',:',:;,,;';" ..:;" :.{" " ',;,::.';.';:
",j' , ,." ....., ' , "',: ;:;.' "':,.'<.<<' ';"'>L;:J;,-:~;:":~:,;,:,.t'.:, > :'.r,':,;
..::- " ., "." ..'+?>',~,;:;;,:',,')' :,...;' , '.' ';.,,}": '"f:';,::, :,:',~,,:r'U{\:.;,~>;: <:~;;;:~;t:"'~'1
" " ' " . ':';'.";".,.. " .. ,;' ,,",,":' ;;,,:~;.,';':. ,,",, ,: ,:'~i:
~ . ~ '. ! '~. . u ".. , '~'.".';}~ :.;.:.~~.c~'::<;':.~.>',~'i,:"~r.:;" ~<;: :~;:r, ':~ '., ':..:"'. '.;;;
" :: ',' ' ",~"",;..", :,' ":~:';':,,:.,:Y:'/(" ",,':<"',',," "" '::::"':',,'.:'
.' ~"',i::,;'<:",': ", , " ~,'\'~;rT;Si :,:' ":<, ::', ,:"'-:":.: f,;; ~j'i;?{::;, :,':::;'~
... .. ., >; ,.' . ...',;../'U"> ;',X<~ ... ..... ..".~'I
,. ,> ". ,', :t, .. '",' "'" ';,~;~.... '::,:;:~II
; " .. , 1: . .,,' "" :; " ",-'.' , ~. .. '. >>,::~";,,:,;.:::' ;,,/!::':<::: ;: ",:'.::,:
'" " , .' ""';:'1 "'," :"~':\."'''',..;:'';;',: .,',':;';
"""., ,,', i .'.. ..::,;",....'::.,':""/':\'*1.
, , ""., ., 'H" " ~: ':,' ..~ '/~;;t.';':7i~<', ':"~\;
, '", '..' ." >> .' .' ';; "".:': "'" ':" . ',,;
',', .. >>:'. ".';:' ,.;';': ,:,' " ' 'c;;f
, .'" '.. .; i' >)i':;" , !;.>; i :::,:;' '", ".,..,
.. , .,.. . ;.' " ,":';,."" " ::,:':.;~!
,; . ',,' : .", "'. ,:'., :-'\; . :. '" ':"i:
',' , ....',,' ' , ..'" (
v," ' '.:>.:::'.:': ~. _ .~"
, "',,'
" . '\"',
'.)
': :~.' : .,','",: .. J:~~::<' .,..
. ".':;':<'.;;," ",',:
, ';~">i:':::;;;:"'; "':,
.: o::,Y';'.. .:;',' "
"':":::/\jC,',:,<t':.. ..' "
.. :,:';::,',::,.",,),', <'C <"
'",,\':',:.'\.'" :,} .\:/,
':;,;,,':""';.." ~:t. 'i,'"
"....,.,;, ,,':::":i<..:,;,Y, ' , >'. ,
.,,:;, ~"::;'E:; '>:':""~' > ,,:jX'":}~.'< .. .' .' " ":'.i:~;,f<'.:'.' :',' ":,:,
" ." "'/iy/ . 'if',:'; .C' , .'.\ '. ,;,,',',
:," ::. ,i<;',':' ,,:/;n:(~"'<"r; ..",';,' " :,: . :-;e,<',:<.,",;;:'.',".
;,' ,;" :'::.,'S'c':, ,'ie," "':,' ,> "';,' . :L:::,;. :',,'::": ,:;' ,,'
.. ,", "',",~:~:.':";';::" ,':':',.",'" .' :',',. ',' ,.'~::,<:..).:, ":,,
t.. ....>'-:.>" .'.~. " ~,;~:';:('~~':".'''z'~':?'~''':''''~ . :'-'.',: '. '. ::':\,~_:~;..{ ';' ,: <
,,:,,:>;,./;;;:"h;;:,\.>':~!L:},>>~,:;: ' "': .'. t':' :. ",
. . :'. ,'" ',,"', \,',,:!-:':::;:/'\';, '. ," , " . ~
, , .;'; :" :. '<"" ',',
.: .", ,:' > ):i: ,<.... i;:;i;",~>;/t;i~'::"';'.';";?': ': .. '
.' ".' ,!:>:. ':'; ,(,.><\" ': '
, , :":',.:,:,/: ... ;,:':'i '
. ;,,(,",'.' "";""'';';'''',,'. '
.. .' i '....,c' ':"';',, ", ',,' .' ";,' "';,:,',"'::i;"., " '
, ':" ""'.' ,,:" iN~ ,.,," ,; .
:",,., '.,~ ::,. ~,;;,:,:: ,,',
,~ . '; ."1";;'" :;:;", ;<!" ." ,~'
, . ':';:,:,>' ie';" ,
"<,".""\' ;L,,:.:'" '
.. "," "..;, ,'i',' ".,
,... :",' '" "':i'"
'" ';': ,',:,;;f:,"'y .',', ';,';;'.' " :
",,;:, ;:,;,:::; .'.":;' .::';:. ',.': .
," " ; ;'};;'/~":'>:-:':'!ir '" '. , ' , . ,: " , ,
",.}::' ":::"F~~:' .'.;','< ::\~::'::::"
., .", : " : ....~':(,~::'{:.L. " >;:;~t,,: . r' ','
. :,' , '. : ".:",:',' :,.i::':::~ '-:, .
,,< '. ,"" "
.~f " ~.
.' <.
f::' ~
: ~'- .. ..
, '.
,)
,',
:,:t..,,:.: ',:; ~' "
:.<>",;: '
" "P , ,.,
, ,;- . ,,-,.., .'.,
-, ~ l. ;; -'\-..' ~ ., ~
<',::, ,.,
'. '" .':' :.:::\ ',:;\:','
',: ,'\:,:;d' ",""
, .' :<':';,~:.'
.:..' ,,',c;, ,;,.
',':i ~>~:>;",
,,"
"
"", ,:::,.~,,;.,','
" ,};<:",):,:,',,, ','
',;> :.'7::">>~,~,;:.' ,::.' .~.. '; ,
','; ,.\\~:,. ,. ..'..
" ", .~' ".,i: :~~,,'J,,:<'" "::' ;', < '.
" ,<, ,i,'y . '(", ,,';
.... i:,; :'; '.. .. ," ' ,
::":,;:">::: ;;',,:,," :, ..'':,''
:: . ,:,.:: ,;": .. , '
\ 26
: "
(~i:,; '<"
~:?,:'/k " ..:.
;, ,.
~ '"
; "
; ';:
"
., 1>'.\
"
" ,,'
, , .. ;.:
, " "",
' .: ,':', '" ',; . .......,' ;~';! I
",,'... ",' ..: ",: " ';",.'., "'"
. :,':"";" ' ~ ',:. "'.; i.:.y>....:.<i..~"..;,..; ...':::..: t 1. 10';"
" ':::;"
,', ,':'
" ",
.'; >,,:
"
"'. ;,
'-,,~.:':, \'~'~~_:;-"
. , j/ ',' .' . . .. ,.' , . , : ,.
. ,..::.
,;
. 'of
,,1 '
, ,
,. ",
. . ~t " . '.'.
~ ~,'
t..'.. '
f. ~ .
", /";-
, ;.,\
e..:. :.,,~ ,~.J~~~
i
,.' ~ " :;',~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence
)7.Q: I~
TO: Michael Wright, City Manager
VIA: Kathy Rice, Deputy City Manager
Scott Shuford, Central Permitting Director ~
SUBJECT: Downtown Development Plan
FROM:
COPIES: Peter Gozza, Community Redevelopment Agency Executive Director
Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk
DATE: October 7, 1993
Attached please find revised pages of the final draft of the Downtown Development Plan.
These pages have been revised pursuant to Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA)
direction on October 4, 1993.
~ Page 21 - The words "strongly encouraged" have been added in the last paragraph
to revised the Commission's approach to parking garages.
The revisions are as follows:
~, Page 71 - This page has been reworded to reflect the changes requested by the CRA.
Specifically, the six projects approved on September 16, 1993 have been added, and
the landscaping and park development proposals have' been "downplayed."
~ Page 72 - Provided simply because of changes to page 71 .
~ Page 74 - This page was revised to reflect the addition of 1992 and partial 1993
information. Since we do not have all of the 1993 information at this time,therovVs '.
. have not been totaled in this table.
~. Appendix E, the d raft parking garage ordinance, was deleted.
~
Page 76 - Appendix "E" has been renumbered due to deletion of former Appendix E. '
. ,
, "
~Page 77 - Appendix "F" has been renumbered due to deletion of former Appendix E~
SS/db
CRAREV,DTN .
.
,
./
CORE DISTRICT
The Core District includes most of the existing Urban Center (Core) zoning in Downtown Clearwater.
It is bounded by Ft. Harrison and Osceola Avenues to the west, Jones Street to the north, Myrtle
Avenue to the east and Turner Street to the south, Figure 6 g illustrates the Core District.
i
.~
~
~
;\
FUNCTION
The function of the Core District is to serve as the most densely developed portion of the Downtown
Clearwater. This district is where the high rise office complexes have recently been constructed and
where they should be continued to be encouraged to be developed. The Core District, because of its
relative isolation from substantial amounts of existing residential uses, should serve as the commercial
entertainment center for Clearwater. That is, restaurants, nightclubs, and similar activities should be
encouraged to locate within the Core District. Because of the large employment base in the Core
District, retail and entertainment uses should be encouraged to locate on the first floor of new
developments.
~
'i
~~
.~.
'l
~
"
ft
~
~
't".
~
...
Fr,
LINKAGES
The Core District is the center of public parking and public transportation for Clearwater's Downtown.
PSTA transfer station is located in the Core District, and two large parking garages, owned and
operated by the City of Clearwater, are also located in the Core District. Due to the presence of these
facilities and the concentrated development pattern (with little or no separation between buildings),
surface parking should be generally discouraged in this district.
,?,
'~
'"
S
\l
~
,
,1
An exception to this "rule" would be surface parking which links existing parking facilities in the district
to one another, thereby expanding the function and scope of the existing parking, The purchase of
the Kravas buildingL and its conversion to surface parking, meets this criterion.
As the Core District abuts a large concentration of governmental office use to its west, the
employment concentration in this area serves as a natural clientele for restaurants, retail and
entertainment activities to be located in the Core District. The new Station Square Park which has
been developed in the Core District is an important amenity for this area, Another similar park should
be built to encourage entertainment and outdoor activities in the southern portion of the Core District
within the next five to ten years.
ASSEM BL Y POSSIBILlTI ES
There is a large amount of publicly owned property within the Core District. The City Police and Fire
Departments are located within the Core District, along with a vacant block also owned by the City.
Since these properties will be of less use to the City in the future (once the new City Hall site has been
developed), the assembly possibilities in the area involving publicly owned property are quite good.
There are also other under-utilized and vacant properties within the Core District which could be
assembled into areas suitable for fairly large scale development. Such assembly possibilities within this
district should be encouraged, primarily for large scale office development, entertainment uses, or
residential development.
DESIGN ISSUES
The Core District can be considered from two perspectives from a desic:m standpoint. First. the should
promoto t~1I structuros in the Downtown ~lrOJ. Ccurrent development patterns, including the Sun Bank
and Clearwater Towers projects, arc examplos of the type of dovolopmont whioh should could continue
to be encouraged in this area. Under this approach, t+:he Core would should serve as the pinnacle for
Downtown structure height, with structure heights generally decreasing to the east and west. The
second option would be to develop a comprehensive streetscape!urban desion prooram. possiblv a
"Main Street" prooram, for the Core. This prooram mioht center on promotino the predominant small-
scale development pattern alono Cleveland Street and adioinino roadwavs throuoh a facade
improvement prooram and associated zonino and desion reoulations. Additional study of these two
options should be a priority proiect.
Surface parking other than on-street parkino, temporary public parkino lots on public property set aside
for eventual redevelopment. and" linked" parkino (such as the Kravas property parkino lot. should
oenerallv be discouraged in this district, and new landscaping and design requirements for parking
garages should be developed. All new parking garages, whether public or private, should be :~tr.Q6.gJ.y
ij9.99.:~:t#ij~9 to utilize ground floor areas for retail, restaurant or entertainment type uses in order"io
improve the relationship of these structures with the pedestrian environment of the Core District. A
preliminarv draft land development code amendment to establish these improved reoulations is provided
as Appendix E.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNlOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
21
OcroBER, 1993
. ,_I ' .~ .,: . . ~ " : i .} . . . .: t, " ~ "', . '. '
APPENDIX DE
GENERALIZED FINANCIAL PLAN
t
\
~
~,
1
The Downtown Development Plan is intended to be a redevelopment plan driven and primarily funded
by the private sector. This is reflected in the Plan's concentration on prioritv land uses for the three
Downtown districts. It is these proiects that will alleviate the depressed economic and structural
conditions that blioht Downtown Clearwater" These proiects cannot be auantified at the present time
since there are no specific proiects under consideration by the Communitv Redevelopment Aoency
lCFtAL However, as the followinQ tables indicate, there is sufficient revenue from the tax increment
furid'to allow public participation in selected private prioritv proiects, aiven anticipated revenues above
existina bond debt service.
e~QJEB
~IITIN:p.::~:$mR~J;T
.......................
MtW~~$.:::~BQTHeR$
AJ~NQM*mUl)N"""" '"
I~il~~'lf~!~
~!7~:~:B;9:::,Il.~~:~!:~9::::gQm
QQNSTflUGJUQN
~'~IIIr'Q:g~:M~@:T.
m..'s....A'...'.I"N......."S..'m....A;.'..m.."I"O....N....
. , .. . ..
~q~y~:$.~~I:~!N...:::,:::,:
a;;lM;)fION$.H{~tr.dtf!t.AN
~ll~II~1~~~~~I(~1~~~rfmKI.NfM1N:rtftEfyQR:R:]*NR:::,9.A~WsftN
~~~rlr.I:!ilar..'I:ENmlqQ:~Fs5gN~:F.:~::g.$.B::::!:N.:::*H'!;
~1~~!lil:::RR~RE~mIgN,AM::q$.:p:::~N::::ifflF:.:J~&YffiR~Nm
fNyR:~~$B:::l\M~,!pt14~hE:::~~a:iSI.JS!@II.NrtHJ;::::y.Qfflg::$\n~Rr$.*RJgi
a~.1in.II~'I~i~I:~wt;:::t\egffl:Q:~P:H:::*9t::t~R~!rnmg,.A!:N@,
~1~~i!'~r:::~@:::n~te~:.lR.jJ~r.~rmBJ$.m~lBJRt\p:t\NQt~:~$mRRmtq
!
~
i
~
,
......,.,......'....l'...'...,.........'t.b.....'....'."..tlf~";;:;(..i....t..'.'..."......f....'....t...'t"ta;;;..'...'......"....'t.tr......... T dd" , I bl . I d d
PI9Pp~Ht~~:~mnmt,t,..,;~::!:t1H~Jl",..J:~~tJ)\J~:m)~J~,,)~,g~".J~t):",n,~r:94rr.~!l,..:t,:,..m;!:~: wo a Itlona ta es are mc u e
which indicate the rsveilues 'received b\iths"CRAand'the'maJor expenditures of the eRA since its
inception,
As previously mentioned, t+here are also general expenditure proposals included within the plan which
cannot be so quantified. Such proposals include:
.. CRA participation in the private development of priority land uses for the various
districts established in the plan.
.. Mass transit improvements linking Downtown Clearwater with Clearwater Beach and
with major employment bases.
.. Downtown Clearwater "spurs" from the Pinellas Trail.
~
..
Removal of the Drew Street pavement linking Coachman Park to Clearwater Harbor.
Because it is not possible to accurately measure or estimate the ultimate cost of these projects, no
specific cost data has been included. Once specific cost figures are developed, each project will be
analyzed on a case-by-case basis in terms of its funding potential and overall contribution to the plan.
Many of the projects also have potential separate funding sources, such as the Drew Street project
(which can be funded through the "Penny tor Pinellas" fund as a modification to the Drew Street
widening project already so funded) or the mass transit improvements (which may be able to be
accommodated by simple adjustments to existing PST A routes or partially funded through developer
contributions exacted when trolley stop locations are planned).
1
y
f
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
71
OCTOBER,1993
. ," ., . , ~ ~'" . ~ ' _,' .., f,.
., \'\....
,~!:, ': ~.. ','
;\: ~'
, ,
,,'
.....
::O,;,z;u'
The above projects will have to be analyzed in terms of the following criteria prior to funding:
~
IS THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE ESTABLISHED PURPOSE AND CHARTER
STATEMENTS OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN?
.~
IS THE PROJECT SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS A PROJECT OR A PRIORITY LAND USE?
.~
IF THE PROJECT IS A PUBLIC/PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, DOES IT DIRECTLY
INVOLVE OR DIRECTLY CONTRIBUTE TO A SPECIFIC PRIORITY LAND USE
ESTABLISHED FOR THE APPLICABLE DISTRICT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT PLAN?
CITY OF CLEARWATER
. DOWNTOWN DEVBLOPMENT PLAN
72
.',.';
"
-"',1..,
':.' ~:.'."~'
r.!
ell
Gl
>-
1j
en
i.i:
>-"'a
C'.2J!1
2ft
&&I 0_
(.D "'I:l
-<.s
.......
2.2
&&I
':is rn
a.f
c,a
uj:w;
i:.i=
ffi!
cc
cc"'a
&&I;
!a: en
;I:!
ccr:
cc!il
&&III)
~a:
-
,0
-
c:
Gl
E
J!I
J!
CI)
..
co
-::.
"tJ
Q)
...
lJ
:0
.5
.c
u
J3
...
o
<<:)
C")
"-
ell
..a
E
Q)
...
c.
Q)
CI)
Cl)
c
:0
c
LU
"-
co
-::.
1:
~
u:
,
, ;,
"
,
~I
~I
~I
;1
~I
~I
~I
~I
~I
. ,<0:1'. 'I '
'. CXl '.
'Cl) "
, ,..
~I
en
ell
o
..
::3 0;
o CD
Ul::s
Ole
c CD
'0 ~
,c a:
~...
'it ~
..E
Gl CD
.co..
5g
-g~
III I-
to
Ql
:I
C
~
Ql
a:
en 0
N Lll
ex) "
...: 0
,... co
N <'l
~ co
(I') <'l
CD ell
en oi
I"- co
N <'l
ll) -.:t
,... "
ex) Lll
a) cD
CD co
(I') C')
ex) <'l
.... co
0) ell
o ~
,... Lll
(I') C')
~ C')
0) <'l
ex) (!)
cD 0)
ll) Lll
(I') C')
o
....
ID
...:
(I')
(I')
~
~
....
00
(I')
N
<0
ID
ID
o
N
-
N
-
~
00
~
ex)
~
cO
N
,... C')
,... "
0) -.:t
c<) ul
N <'l
~
e
::s
o
U
~
~
"0
e
i:i:
.-
Lll
"
c-i
C')
C')
<'l
-.:t
"
~
<'l
III
<'l
"
cD
"
ell
(!)
C')'
Lll
"
Lll
(Xl
0)
<'l
..
Ql
...
III
::
..
III
Gl
(j
....
o
~
(1
rn
OJ
::s
c
m
>
CD
0::
...
m
.r=
....
o
<'l
~
"
-i
C")
....
....
o
CX!,
-
~
o LO
... N
l":
ex)
(\j
~
...
.-
.-
.-
o
N
G)
E
o
t)
c
"-
G)
.c
... '....
o 0
III
'"tl
ell
CD
o
o
o..
Q.
(1)
C")
at
...
It)
U>>
N
...
It)
...
N
U>>
(1)
It)
o
N
,.:
,...
G)
G)
~
...
,
...
3
...
U>>
at
It)
C")
,...
0)
Lll
<0
,
....
co
....
~
...
,.:
(1)
U!,
...
:.1'. '.,.1.",'
"
,;.',
1~
, "I
' ~'~ I
';':"1
C") en
('I) <0
CXl ex)
c-i N
en (I')
"
La
,..
ex) 0
(I') M
~ l":
..; M
.... Ul
...
...
M
~
<0
o
o
N
c-i
N
N
o
(1)-
o
It)
N
':~'I
,)
,:1
,
.t ;:.~:,
C")
CXl
-.:t (I') 0 LO
(!) <0 0
I' ex) 0
en en tD
I' .... N
en
C")
o
ui
~
o
LO
LO
o
N
I'
00
o
-i
....
o
Ul
LO
00
.-
o
o
o
o
...
~
La
N
~
~
ex)
en
C")
,..
lit.
en
....
o
o
o
o
en
"
00
ell
I'
-i
o
I'
....
1Il
...
C
Q)
E
...
III
Q)
::-
J:
c
o
1Il
Ol
c
'2
..
(lJ
UJ
CD
E
o
(.)
e
'i6
...
e
CD
0::
"C
e
III
..J
...
o
Ql
'i6
(J)
(l)
...
U!,
...
...
G)
~
...
o
(l)
...
N
(1)
0)
~
III
III
ell
e
"C
Gl
...
.0
Gl
'"tl
1:
:a
::>>
15
~
ex::
...
:!
g
z
'. .' '.,
. .......
, "
APPENDIX I
RELOCATION POLICY
The City of Clearwater Downtown Development Plan proposes possible redevelopment activities associated with
orioritv land uses (as defined bv district within the Plan) that may result in the displacement of low and moderate
income persons. In the event that such displacement occurs. the followinQ relocation policy is established to assist
these persons in relocation.
Definitions.
"LOW-TO-MODERATE INCOME" is defined as a household income that does not exceed 80% of the
median income for the Tampa/St.Petersbura/Clearwater Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined by the United
States Department of Housino and Urban Development and adiusted for household size.
"REASONABLE RELOCATION EXPENSES" are defined as:
A. Movino expenses of the displaced persons and their property for a distance of 50 miles. Transportation
cost for a distance beyond 50 miles can be iustified. The discretion to determine whether movinQ costs
beyond 50 miles are reasonable and necessary is at the sole discretion of the Community Redevelopment
Aoency.
B. First and last month's rent for new accommodations.
C. Security deposit for new accommodations.
D. Utility deposits and/or reconnection of utilities (not includino line extensions or other capital expenses) for
new accommodations.
.5..:.
Anv movino expense not described above that is determined by the Community Redevelopment Aaencv
to be reasonable and necessarv.
'j
Minimum Reauired Relocation Plan Provisions.
The City of Clearwater Downtown Development Plan establishes the followino provISions reQardino
residential relocation that occurs within the oeoaraphical boundaries of the Downtown area.
ill The City of Clearwater shall make its best effort to provide written notice to residential tenants who will
be displaced 60 davs prior to loss of possession.
121 The City of Clearwater shall provide advisory services. as appropriate. includino counselino. referrals to
suitable. decent. safe and sanitary replacement housino which is comparable, within the tenant's financial
means. and housina-related advisory services.
Ql The City of Clearwater shall provide payment and/or reimbursement of actual reasonable relocation
expenses for displaced low-to-moderate income persons UP to a maximum of $1 .000.00 per household.
I
. I
!
i
!
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
76
OCTOBER, 1993
APPENDIX 11
.:.:.~:.:.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
" . ~ I .', ^,. ," # '.' " I . }' , '
, ',' 'j ~
.....>, ,
'.';M
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence
FROM:
J7-e:' J 7 -I- I <g'
/6h /13
James M. Polatty, Jr., Director of Planning and Development 1u...~ Ie;)
Development Code Adjustment Board Action on Two Land Development Code
Amendments '
Michael Wright, City Manager
I
i
I
,I
~ i
,
.' ~
:': ~
,:/1
TO:
VIA:
Kathy Rice, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT:
COPIES:
Cyndie Goudeau, City ClerkV
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager
DATE:
September 24, 1993
. .
; ,
I, :fl:; .
, .
',',\
On September 23, 1993, the Developm~ht Code Adjustment Board considered two
proposed Land Development Code amendrTi~hts. This memorandum is to advise you of the
Board's recommendation to the City Comtffts'~ion.
b,\,',
,I~.\'; ~(l.
First, under Ordinance No. 5460-93, relatirg~o temporary signage for new businesses, the
Development Code Adjustment Board rec<5r;r1~ended that the City Commission adopt the
proposed ordinance subject to the followiridiconditions:
'!,j: ";-
Deletion of the allowance for small b~~I'joons under any circumstances (the Board had
no problem with the large balloon alfQ,wance); and
LF\' ::
A provision be added that any bann~fbr balloon erected under the ordinance that is
not well maintained shall be sUbjecf;"o removal by City staff.
\8'
The Board was concerned about the enviibnmental impact of small balloons as they affect
turtles, birds and other sea life. 'r::::;:~,
. , ::~:<;,
Second, the Board also considered Ordin~hce, No. 5463-93, relating to nonconforming
density on barrier islands. The Board enddi~ed this ordinance as written.
~
~.
< i;' t', :
Should you have questions or comments, please contact me.
JMP/SS/db
" ~.:'" ;
. t; i ~, ;"
\ .l'
~: :, i
. \~:' .'
ORDS,SS
.:1
, t.,.. I
: ~, ~ ~ ~!.'
\i'!~':"::' '
',1':.~ : ~i:' :"
f.'loft f
: .~. f:jl..;.~.,\:
'.i'
~~.t::'"
~ ' "
J
"
",
,:,,: ,':', C,.,
,"1.,1
"
'"
AGENDA
ITEM #J '1
DATE
t()- 1. 9'~
tW6J
...I..IIII.....--.I_'..._'....I~.... .
t. ~. '.
".'~ "~'. ,~I.' .'~
, ;., -::-~.~.}-:.x~;7,~{J}r~:;;i~~~0~jlft~~~~:~Aj7},-~
,<.,'.":';' .
,t,i
,.,..',t.
"';' ;~;1~
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
1'1.
101'7/'13
SUBJECT:
Land Development Code Amendment - Temporary Signs.
(LDCA 93-03)
RECO M M EN DATION/MOTION:
Approve Land Development Code amendment concerning temporary signage and pass on first reading
Ordinance No. 5460-93.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
The Commission has requested a revision of the sign regulations to provide for temporary signs for new
businesses and for businesses having their signs damaged in isolated storm events or through acts of
vandalism.
The attached Ordinance No. 5460-93 has been prepared to address the Commission's concerns through
the following added signage allowances:
~ New Businesses would be allowed the following signs for up to 90 days after opening:
. One 32 sq. ft. freestanding banner, or a banner or banners attached to existing sign
face or faces, not exceeding the size of the sign face or faces; OR .
.
Up to 20 small balloons or one large, 20 ft. diameter balloon; OR
. Window signs up to 400/0 of window area or 64 sq. ft., whichever is less.
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
Commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Denied
o Continued to:
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
~
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Originating Dept: -"\" "".0
PLANNING & DE~M8Nl \1l
Costs: S N/A
Total
Il~
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
~ Not Required
Affected Parties
o Notified
~ Not Requi red
FUlding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Attachments:
ORDINANCE NO. 5460-93
1
Appropriation Code:
o None
^
~~ Printed on recycied paper
., ,
, , ,-, . , ' . ". " r . ~ . , ., .
: . ~. ,
,; ,
f~'~.~ '.
';' ,.::. ": ~T ~; ." .,\;.." ,.
, .; ,,>.,',;
,:,'~t.'
Temporary Signs
LDCA 93-03
Page 2
,i
~ Businesses Having Name Changes would be allowed the following signs for up to 30 days after
opening:
. One 32 sq. ft. freestanding banner, or a banner or banners attached to existing
sign face or faces, not exceeding the size of the sign face or faces; OR
,.
,I
:'.'!
,I
".I
:".1
.:~!
.
Up to 20 small balloons or one large, 20 ft. diameter balloon; OR
,'If
1
,:,1
I
. Window signs up to 40o/cl of window area or 64 sq. ft., whichever is less.
~ Businesses Suffering Isolated Storm Damage would be allowed the following signs for up to 30
days:
. One 32 sq. ft. freestanding banner, or a banner or banners attached to existing
sign face or faces, not exceeding the size of the sign face or faces; OR
. Window signs up to 400/0 of window area or 64 sq. ft., whichever is less.
The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of this amendment at its
meeting of September 14, 1993, subject to the deletion of the allowance for balloons as temporary
signage.
The Development Code Adjustment Board will consider this amendment on September 23, 1993,
and its action will be reported to the Commission in a separate memorandum.
'i'
< ',. :,. ','"-
. ~- --_._~-~
I ' " .. " ~. ." .' . ... . < ' . , " "
ORDINANCE NO. 5460-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE; ANENDING SECTIONS 44.08 AND 44.54,
CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ALLOW TEMPORARY
SiGNS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Sections 44.08(19) and 44.54(5), Code of Ordinances, are
amended, and a new Subsection (6) is added to Section 44.54, to read:
Sec. 44.08. Exempt signs.'
The following types of signs are exempt from the permitting requirements
of this chapter, provided that number, area, and other limitations set forth in
this section are satisfied. The area of exempt signs shall not be included in
determining compliance with maximum allowable sign area requirements. Exempt
signs are allowed in addition to signs for which permits are required. An
otherwise exempt sign which exceeds the limitations of this section shall require
a permi t.
(19) Temporary window signs. Signs shall be allowed in nonresidential
zoning districts for a period not longer than 30 days or as may otherwise be
allowed by this code. The maximum area of such signs shall be 20 percent of
window area or 100 square feet, whichever is less. The area to be used for such
signs shall be clearly delineated with paint, tape or other markings to aid in
the enforcement of the area requirements of this section.
Sec. 44.54. Sign bonus provisions; temporary signs.
This section is establ ished to recognize unusual circumstances which create
the need to modify, in a consistent and uniform manner, the requirements of this
chapter for sign area, height, number and type.
(5) Temporary signs--major public works pro.iects or major storm events.
I n the event of a major' pu b 1 i c work s pro ject, such as but not 1 imi ted to a road
widening project, or in the event of a major storm event which results in the
widespread destruction of existing signs, temporary signs may be erected upon
property affected by such project or damaqe eyent as provided in this subsection.
(a) Property location. The property upon which the sign is to be erected
shall be located within an area designated by a resolution of the city commission
as an area adversely affected by a major public works project or damaqed by a
major storm.
(b) Sign types, number, size, height, and location. The following may be
erected on any property located as described in subsection (5)(a) of this
section, in addition to any other sign wh'ich may lawfully be erected on such
property.
1. One freestanding directional sign for each driveway on the affected
roadway, each sign not exceed i ng 20 square feet in area and not
exceeding six feet in height, placed no closer than five feet from
any property line; or
2. One banner per property in districts other than the commercial
center~ district, or one banner per freestanding building in the
COl1llllerC i a 1 center d i s tr i ct. Each banner s ha 11 be attached to the
building and shall not exceed 48 square feet in area.
3. For the purposes of subsection (5)(b)1., freestanding directional
sign mean s any sign supported by structures or supports that is
placed on or anchored in the ground and that is independent of any
bllilding or other structure, and which exclusively contains
information providing direction to or location of any object, place,
or area including but not limited to those signs indicating avenues
of ingress/egress.
(c) Duration. Each sign erected pursuant to this subsection (5) of this
scctiOft shall be removed not later than seven days following completion of the
public works project or portion thereof affecting the visibility of the property
or no t 1 a te\~ tha n 45 days f 011 owi ng the damage storm event, wh i chever is
applicable. As used in this subsection, completion means that active
construction shall have ceased and construction equipment shall have been removed
from the public works project or portion thereof affecting the visibility of the
pro pert y I wile the Y' t he pub 1 i c agency has accepted the cons t ru ct i on work or not.
iQl Temporary siqns--new businesses or business name chanaes. For a new
business or a chanqe of business name, temporary siqns may be erected upon the
premises of the business as provided in this subsection.
ltl Property location. The property upon which the sign is to be erected
shall be located within a nonresidential zoning district appropriate to the
business. The siQn shall be erected upon the premises of the business.
11U Siqn types, number, size, heiqht, and location. The followinq may be
erected on any j)roperty located as described in subsection (6)(a) of this
section, in addition to any other siqn which may lawfully be erected on such
Rroperty, upon the issuance of a temporary sian permit as provided herein.
1. One banner not exceedinq 32 square feet in area and not exceedinq
six feet in heiqht, placed no closer than five feet from any
property line, or one banner securely attached to an existina sian
face and no larger than the existinQ siqn face: or'
2. Not more than 20 balloons havinq a maximum diameter of 18 inches
each. or a sinQle cold air balloon of not more than 20 feet in
diameter: or
3. One O\~ more temporary window siQns havinq a maximum area, in the
i!Slure<]ate. of not more than 40% l1ercent of window area or 64 square
feet, whichever is less.
ifl DUration. Each siqn erected pursuant to this subsection (6) shall
be removed not later than the date upon INhich the temporary siqn permit expires.
.uu. Temporary siqn permit. A temporary siqn permit shall be issued to
2
the owner of a new bu s; nes s or the new owner of an ex; st i nQ bus; ness upon
application by the owner. provided that the application shall be filed within 30
days followinQ issuance of an occupational license for the business bv the city.
A temporary siqn permit shall expire 30 days after issuance in the case of a
chanqe of ownership, or 90 days after issuance ;n the case of a new business.
A temporary siqn permit shall not be issued more than two times in the same
calendar year for the same business premises.
ill Temporary signs--isolated damaqe due to vandalism, accidents, minor
storm events, or other similar incidents.
1i!l SimLiYpes. number, size, heiqht, and location. For properties
ha vi nq 5 i qns damaqed by vanda 1 ism, acc i dents , In i nor 5 torm events. or other
similar incidents, the followinq may be erected, in addition to any other siQn
which may lawfully be erected on such property, upon the issuance of a temporary
siqn permit as provided herein.
1.:.. One banner not exceedinq 32 square feet in area and not exceedinq
six feet in height, placed no closer than five feet from any
property line, or one banner securely attached to an existinq sign
face and no larqer than the existing siQn face: and
2. One or more temporary window siqns havinQ a maximum area, in the
aqqreqate, of not more than 40 percent of window area or 64 square
feet, whichever is less.
ihl Duration. Each siqn erected pursuant to this subsection (7) shall
be removed not latet~ than the date upon which the temporary siqn permit expires.
ifl Temporary sign permit. A temporary sian permit shall be issued to
a property or business owner who has suffered damaqe to an existinq sian due to
vandalism, accidents, minor storm events or other similar incidents, and shall
expire 30 days after issuance of the temporary sign permit.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
~
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
I
3
FROM:
Michael Wright, City Manager
Kathy Rice, Deputy City Manager
Scott Shuford, Central Permitting Director~)
~= 17
, .
> >\. '.,
" ~. .,
.,,' l".
." ."':;, ,).>
, I:
,,' ':'
" ; r
,<.,;, ."," "" '-
C I T Y 0 F C LEA R W ATE R
Interdepartment Correspondence
TO:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
Temporary Sign Code Amendment (Ordinance No.
-5460-93)
COPIES:
M.A. Galbraith, City Attorney
Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk
DATE:
October 7, 1993
The temporary sign ordinance was discussed by the Code Enforcement
Task Force on yesterday afternoon. By a 4-2 vote, the Task Force
recommended approval of the ordinance subject to the following
changes:
~ Reduction of the 90 day allowance for new businesses to
30 days
~ Deletion of the provision for small balloons
'~ Allowance of the cold air balloon for a three day period
only
~ Addition of language that would permit the location of
the temporary signage only in areas where there were no
safety problems created (such as with vehicular or
pedestrian circulation or sight distance)
The members voting against this recommendation were opposed
primarily due to the time limitation on the cold air balloons,
which they felt should be allowed for a lO day period.
You may wish to share this information with the City Commission.
Please advise if there are questions or comments.
pln\signtaslc,cc
,}:
. .;\
.' ;"1
:'1
, i/,
I
I
"
'\
i\1 E:\IORANDUi\1
;'
, .
~=
/1
~. .::- : ~ ~ 1
. 4 t .. ~" . . ~. .
. .,.I.,
..;.~,;) -....."";.:.....~ t(.'..;'.'
.. _ ." ' : '..,; '. ). I ~. ..
TO:
~'fayor and City Commissioners
, 'T'... "1 .
'_' t I L,_::~,.\
FROl\I:
Bruce Cardin~I, Chairman
Code Enforccment Review Task Review
COPI ES:
~tichael \Vright, City iv1anager
SUBJECT:
Land Dc"clopl11cnt Codc Arncndnlcnt - Tcnlporary Signs
Item 1117 on 10/07/93 Agenda - Ordinance No. 5460-93
Task Force Rccommcndation
DATE:
October 7, 1993
At the CER TF meeting held October 6, 1993, the followi ng motion was carried by the Task Force.
Pro Dosed Amendment Ordinance No. 5460-93
iH OTION:
The committee recommends that the City Commission endorse Ordinance 5460-93
excepting that the time period for the display of banners at new businesses be reduced
to thirty (30) days: that there be a prohibition against small balloons; and that the time
period for display of larger, cold air inflatable balloons be reduced to three (3) days,
subject to approval of safety considerations.
."":"~~,
", ". '.~'.;l
",
'. ;.1
" :.':,7.
'. ~~~.
This motion carried five to two. Voting "aye" were Chairman Bruce Cardinal, Bill Jonson,
Brian Morris. Lce Regulski, and Bill Zinzow. Voting "nay" were David Little and Syd Snair.
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meet ing Date:
J i . IOhliJ
SUBJECT:
Land Development Code amendment relating to nonconforming density and intensity on barrier islands.
(LDCA 93-14)
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION:
Approve Land Development Code amendment relating to nonconforming density and intensity on barrier
islands and pass on first reading Ordinance No. 5463-93.
o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
The City Commission, responding to the Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force report, requested
staff to investigate ways in which density or use intensity incentives could be provided to promote
redevelopment in conformity with City code requirements. Staff initially proposed a comprehensive plan
amendment allowing density increases on the barrier island if there was complete compliance with flood
hazard prevention regulations, and contingent upon safe hurricane evacuation times being maintained
and concurrency regulations being met.
The State Department of Community Affairs rejected this amendment, but did advise staff that local
governments were free to deal with issues involving existing densities and intensities of use. That is,
the State allows us to maintain existing densities but we cannot increase them.
Following this suggestion, staff has prepared the attached draft ordinance. This ordinance, if adopted,
would allow property owners who are voluntarily repairing or reconstructing their buildings to retain
existing nonconforming densities or intensities of use so long as they meet all other City development
requirements (such as setbacks, open space, landscaping, flood hazard prevention, and building code
requirements) .
Staff feels the adoption of this ordinance would provide a limited incentive for bringing properties into
compliance with City development regulations (other than density or intensity of use requirements).
There will be no conflicts with Countywide Plan (Pinellas Planning Council) use intensity rules since local
governments are allowed to address nonconformities completely at their own discretion.
The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of this amendment on September
14, 1993.
Roviowod by:
Legal
Budget
purchas i ng
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACN
Other
~
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Originating Dopt: ~ M. P
PLANNING & D~O~~T'
Costs:
$ N/A
T ota l
Commission Action:.
o Approved.
o Approved w/conditions
o Deni ed
o Cont inued to:
User Dupt:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
i5J
Advortisod:
Date:
Paper:
~ Not Requi red
Affected Partiel
D Notified
~ Not Requi red
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Attachments:
ORDINANCE NO. 5463-93
City
~.
o None
Appropriation Code:
....
~~ Printed on recycled paper
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO. 5463-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING
SECTION 42.21, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR NONCONFORMING USES ON BARRIER
ISLANDS TO ENCOURAGE COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT
AND BUILDING REGULATIONS, INCLUDING FLOOD DAMAGE
PREVENTION REGULATIONS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Sectiol}.J.. Section 42,21, Coue of Oruinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 42.21. Noncunfonnities.
(7) Nonconforming d~nsities O[ intensities of use in structures located on a barrier island.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any structure located on a barrier island within the
eeaslHl-hili!arEl-2eH~ whkh is nonconforming due to density or intensity of use, but which was in
compliance with all i1ppl icahle land development regulations at the time of its construction, and which
is damaged or destroyed by a storm, nood, fire or other catastrophic event, or proposed for maior repair
or reconstmction not rdated 10 a storm, tlOlld. tire or other catastrophic event shall be subject to the
followi ng:
(a) If the structure is damaged such that the cost of repair or reconstruction to its pre-damaged
condition is less than 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred,
the structure may he repaired or reconstructed in compliance with subsection (3) of this section,
and shall not he subject to the requirements of chapter 51 relating to flood damage prevention.
(h)
If the structure is damaged stich that the cost of reconstruction to its predamaged condition equals
or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred, the
structure may be reconstructed in cOlllpl iance with subsection (5) of this section. The project
shall be subject to all appl icable development regulations, and building code requirements,
including but not limited to the requirements of chapter 51, relating to flood damage prevention,
with the exception of density or intensity of use requirements.
I
1
j
I
i
i
W If the structure is proposed for rep.lir or recomaruction not related tn damage by a storm. fl()od~
fire or other catastrophic event and the cost of repair or reconstruction equals or exceeds 50
percent of the market value of the st 1'1Ictu re het()re the repair or reconstruction. the proiect shall
he suoiect to all applicahle development regulations and huilding code requirements. incl.llillng
hut not limited to the requirements of chapter 51. relating to flood damage prevention. with the
exception of density or intensity of use requirements: provided. however. that the density anq
floor area shall not exceed the density and floor area that existed prior to such repair or
reconstruction,
..?
"
,
;;
!dl(e) Any owner who proposes repair or reconstruction pursuant to this subsection shal1 demonstrate
that the structure was in compliance with all applicable regulations at the time of construction.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance have been found to be consistent with the City of
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan,
Section 3. This onJ inanec shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Attest: .,
Cynthia E. Goudeml
City Clerk
Approved as to 1'01'111 and COITCetllcss:
M. A. Galbl'ait
City Attorney
pln\nOC1c~r,ord
. 1" "
,';! "
. 'I' . . . '. .' " .,... , .. .:" '. ~ . ,. . .
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
B.
/6)'7/Q3
SUBJECT:
Land Development Code Amendment - Nursing Homes in Multiple Family Zoning Districts.
(LDCA 93-09)
* RECOMMENDATION/MOTION:
Approve Land Development Code amendment to allow nursing homes in multiple family zoning districts
and pass on first reading Ordinance No. 5464-93.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
In working with the Pinellas Planning Council Consistency Program, staff found that many communities
permit nursing homes in their medium and high density land use plan categories. Given the potential
impacts of such uses, they seem to be quite compatible with these zoning districts. Consequently, staff
would recommend that they be included as a conditional use in the RM-16, RM-20, RM-24, and RM-28
zoning districts.
Nursing homes are limited to the "residential equivalent" of 15 dwelling units per acre; this translates
to a maximum of 30 beds per acre at 2 beds per dwelling unit. The following table indicates the allowed
residential density in each of the zoning districts recommended for this additional conditional use. Please
note that the maximum residential equivalent density allowed for nursing homes is equal to or less than
the maximum density in any of the applicable zoning districts.
ZONING DISTRICT
RM-16
RM-20
RM-24
RM-28
ALLOWED DENSITY
15.0 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE
18.5 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE
22.5 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE
26.0 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE
The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of this amendment on
September 14, 1993.
Reviewed by: ~
Legal
Budget N/A
~ Purchasing N/A
Risk Mgmt. N/A User Dept:
CIS N/A
ACM
Other N/A
COltS:
. NIA
Total
Commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Denied
o Continued to:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
~
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
181 Not Rcqui ,'cd
Affected Partie.
o Notified
181 Not Requ; rcd
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Attachments:
ORDINANCE NO. 5463-93
o None
Appropriation Code:
~ Printed on recycled paper
ORDINANCE NO. 5464-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO TH E LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING
SECTIONS 40.164, 40.184, 40.204, 40.224, CODE OF
ORDINANCES, TO PROVIDE FOR NURSING HOMES AS A
CONDITIONALUSEINTHE MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 16,
20, 24, AND 28 ZONING DISTRICTS; AMENDING SECTION
41.053 TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONAL USE
STANDARDS FOR SUCH USES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section 40. 164, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 40.164. Conditional uses,
Within multiple-family residential 16 districts, the following uses may be permitted as .
conditional uses:
( 1 ) Level II group care;
(2) Congregate care;
(3) Noncommercial parking;
(4) Residential shelters;
ill Nursing homes,
Section 2. Section 40.184, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 40.184. Conditional uses.
Within multiple-family residential 20 districts, the following uses may be permitted as
conditional uses:
(1 ) Level II grOlJp care;
(2) Congregate care;
(3) Noncomn lercial parking;
(4) Residential shelters;
@ Nursing Ilomes,
\
1;
,
j
'ii.J
Section 3. Section 40.204, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 40.204. Conditional uses.
Within multiple-family residential 24 districts, the following uses may be permitted as
conditional uses:
(1 ) level II group care;
(2) Congregate care;
(3) Noncommercial parking;
(4) Residential shelters;
@ Nursing homes.
Section 4, Section 40,224, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 40.224. Conditional uses.
Within mulitple-family residential 28 districts, the following uses may be permitted as
conditional uses;
(1 ) level II group care;
(2) Congregate care;
(3) Noncommercial parking;
(4) Residential shelters;
1ID. Nursing homes.
Section 5. Section 41 .053, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 41.053. Supplementary standards by category of use.
The standards in this section which apply to the id,entified category of use shall supplement
the general standards of use identified in section 41 .052. No conditional use shall be
authorized unless determined to meet all of the standards applicable thereto.
* * * * * *
2
"."..
.': ~.. - ~,
"
, "
<' ,..'
(21) Nursing homes may be permitted within the multiole-family 16. 20. 24. and 28
residential districts, and the limited office, general office and the public/semipublic
districts upon determination that:
(a) The use shall be appropriately located in an area not concentrated with similar
facilities. ';
(b) The use shall be separated from high activity or noise generating areas.
(c) The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section
41.052.
* * * * * *
Section 6. The provisions of this ordinance have been found to be consistent with the
City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Section 7, This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
,FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
- ,-,,"
"
, "
Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner
',.. .
:: Attest:
.: ..
, . . ~
. 'Cynthia 'E.. Goudeau
,City Clerk
Approved as to for and correctness:
M. A. Galbrait
City Attorney
'.
3
.'l,',,:' ",' ,
, '.. " , .' ". . '. . IE' ,'. '. " . ' f " .
,. : , ~
10/'7/'13
O?I
ORDINANCE NO. 5389-93
AN ORDINANCE OF TilE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMEND I NG THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
CO~1PREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DES I GNA T I ON FOR CERTA I N REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TIlE INTERSECTION OF TURNER STREET
AND SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CONSISTING OF LOT 3 AND PART OF
LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 22, MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, WHOSE
POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 801, 803 AND 805 TURNER STREET,
FRO~1 RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
'c',
\~HEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be
reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
Property
See Exhibit A attached
hereto. (LUP 93-11)
Land Use Cateqory
From: Residential/Office
To: Commercial General
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City.s Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board
of County Commissioners. The Director of Planning and Development is authorized
to transmit to ttle Pinellas County Planning Council an application to amend the
Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan
Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended by this ordinance.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
June 3, 1993
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
:'
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
, , ..\~~~::~r
: "i,.
,~ .;
,'"
'. ',.,
'/:n.;~;
','
North 125 feet of Lot 1,
map or plat thereof as
records of Pinellas County,
Block 22, Magnolia Park,
recorded in Plat Book 3, Page
Florida, less right-of-way;
according to the
43, public
lot 2, less
according to
Page 43, public
the South 50 feet thereof,
the map or plat thereof as
records of Pinellas County,
Block 22, Magnolia park,
recorded in Plat Book 3,
Florida; and
lot 3, Block 22, Magnolia Park, according to the map or
as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, public
County, Florida.
plat thereof
records of Pinellas
. 'i
" I ~
/;'
. , ,~
EXHIBIT A
(I ,07
'"
Vl"
I" "I ; (J!1
o ~ ~', "
::; r, ~ ~ ~ "', ,6 I , ~
'Cr' N- - ;1i~ iu~i '::_, 't~~G-t; -.
~--,~:_---- :r= :_~~. --~:, ~ 70/ "'--;)"V; -- ~-
o I t (I 0 0
t, ~ C:l Cl ~ I '0 co IQ
h : ,: t... ('1
1'"
hl
2 I j "
.... L,
-.-- ~0' l~' -,"--
In I G <.I. G
9 ~1 .~
I ~ ~
'"
.. ~ I -'.
i I
s inU. f
'. .-
~ ti
C() '"
-
-
.,
'(l
t-.. :: ;; -_.- - '" ,0 I
:::. ~o ~ ~ ~ . I
C) __1
.. i; ~
... t.
!: ~
III Ie>
)
5
2
ILl
::J
~
-" _ .c
I
II 7 G lii
,"5
J ..
2
5
Q 8)
o
7
10 9
10 9
!)
g ;;~:i ~
10 'a '40 I.Q \D
g
t.
<>j
o
'"
tu,t.u~(' SlHU:T
<:1_
'"
-
.....
C>
to.
~ :n~ ::;:; ~ t;~
~ '0'0 '0'4 \0 '0\0
t; ~
'" r,
B
1;
,.
.,
o
...
...
In
7. I
U,l J
2 3 4 5
2
3 ~ 5
,(2 ~)-- B-
7
8
@
III
o
to
o
iO
10 9
8 7 6
6
10
9
;T
D
,"
~j: 9:
l'4
h
\()
~
'"
., I<) "l
- - -
Ii) I<) '0
S InEE T
I:)
\()
\() t ~ tJ
_ :! 10 li1 \0 '0
0, III
C:l ..,
..,
~
2 .J
..j
5
? I
- 2 )
G?
10 19 B
I
.. I llJ ~
~ ~ '0
. .--- ---- - ~- -- ----
7
10
o
o
'"
C\j
~ J~ _.}, [_~
o
_ lD
0_
10 ,
:) ..
o
r-
OWNEn
APPLICANT
1,1 Sw PO Ri
o \L
CDR?
,LAND USE PL^~J
,.'" -.. .- .-- ciiE.s mUf - -. --'-'-"-'" - . ~ r-
g- r'~ -~ lr ~ a eo ~ ~
Cl U;STN lJ'l
COUHT
CONDO
2 J 4 5 G 7 U 02-02
;',
. I II
....
r-
II' 0
''0
If'
I
,
1<.1
::l___
(:1
>
~
-.
,,,
.c-
I
~
10
ci
d
H - lt1-
l'
8
ti ·
'\I
o
III
Ii'
r-4. -.. ....
'j ;,;~;:i '~.'$' ,; i
~ 4ht~'::~~' ,~ ,~
~2,f1; {rfr1~: {ijj;::' ..
f/.':if>'.} \j~. ; 4
I~ ;:~ 1"~:([\ _
:t IJ ~
6 15 ,-\ 13
~I
2
J
70.1
15 11
Ii
I)
l'>l
l)
llJ
;~
~07 /2
i
J
1
~
...
~
a
)
8
lV----
12 1\ !\
-e!"- 1 0 9
~
-<
\2 Jl JO
609
2. 7 26 5
10
<:)
IQ
'"
o
01
10 III 0
~ ~ 0;
lURtlER
~
,
(/
v~ '00
'L.~~_
... ---,-
2
.1
I
5 I
G~' l'
~-- - -
vs-
~
t=-
o
...
;: ::!
... ...
ltJ
-
..
3 " 5 6 7 8
0-
60.f
- 8';0 ti
0:
Vl
o
0:
n.
-r - '2-
--------G
~]._ ~I_ JO 7.9 m 25
f; 07 '(-...
'2J1_ _'- ? I\. 17 26
~ 10 0 "l ...
"I' 0 C:l - " ..
u ~_ ~ 01 ~ 01
RM 8
. ~- -,- ~-" -~- -~- ~.~ ~
__J_':_ ;
...
9
-1
5
~
o. .
W II J AMS~'
-1 ._.L!~
1
03
_ _ _ _ _t)
,\
I
I
29 28 27 26 2~'!
700
05
2_- -- 4
J
6
7
5
"-~5)- Q- 01
J
13
1 j
70B
10- g-
32 31 30
12
60
., 10 II) "l
Cl 0 0 "
01 01 01 01
- :? ORUID R.. \)
OJ /' --, 1-'-1 , I. l7; -..--r-17"l-r I I I ,
ZONING
.
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and REZONING
rnOM RESI DE.pJ-t If\L lof:"FlC-E:,
~
II
i
J
Ij
C
J
~ ---
~
,
CoMME:~CII'\L G€.kJGRI\L-'
TO
p LA H H l H G tI n d Z 0 ,.11 tl G U 0 AnD
~
.]
t
'1
,
I
TO WHS"IP 'Lq
\5"
Sf.CTIOIl
s
'Slnot, Fllmlly
8:= BUSINESS
oL
eN
~-=-~-[=
n ^ t~ a E \ S- E
C T'(::: c. 0 v tJ TV
~ _ r I
I ,
I I rvl VII. I
.....'
zQ3-06
Lupq3-11
pnOPERTY DEsCntPTIOU
L 0 I '3 PAn\' L aTS \ q,( '1- \
~Ll<. 221
1\'\A~NDLt A ?~RK..
0.53 AcnES
C I T Y COM MIS S I 0 ~4
ATL....s PA.OE
'2..'1G A
BLOc:,
.A::OUPLEX.
ORDINANCE NO. 5390-93
~~
16/'7/93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING
CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
INTERSECTION OF TURNER STREET AND SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE,
CONSISTING OF LOT 3 AND PART OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 22,
MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
801, 803 AND 805 TURNER STREET, AS DESCRIBED MORE
PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM lIMITED OFFICE (OL) TO
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
I
I
I
J
WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance
with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is
hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
See Exhibit A attached
hereto. (Z93-06)
Zoning District
From: Limited Office - (OL)
To: Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City1s Comprehensive Plan.
Property
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND'FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
June 3, 1993
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoin9 amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
subject to the approval of the land use category set forth in Ordinance No.
5389-93 by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioner.
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved ~nd
~ '
M. A. Galbrait r.
City Attorney
correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
~ , '
North 125
ma p or
records
feet of Lot 1,
plat thereof as
of Pinellas County,
Block 22, Magnolia
recorded in Plat
Florida, less
Park, according
Book 3, Page 43,
right-of-way;
to the
public
2,
50 feet
plat thereof
of Pi ne llas
thereof,
as
County,
Block 22, Magnolia park,
recorded in Plat Book 3,
Florida; and
Lot
1 ess the South
accord i ng to the map or
Page 43, public records
Lot 3, Block 22,
as recorded in Plat
County, Florida.
Magnolia Park, according to the map or plat thereof
Page 43, public records of Pinellas
Book
'"
",
EXHIBIT A
-'
01
;0
)
~)
1"v(\.\J~ <.
...
~
7.
LL
7
8
'"
Q
'"
l:>
:.;
;T
o
'11
'"
(;)
..,
-
..,
7.
-2
i
j
~
, -.
,
~ ~o ~. ~ --- ~ -: I - ~ ~
'" r-.... t.. 1 ... " I
C ) _ L_ _ _ _i
.. :.'"...
~
..,
sintU
..
., t';
~ ....
, -
..
...
. ...j
-- - '~.. I
2
J 4
5
0_
0{)
6
o
'0 .
;-}
"
I 2
w
4 ,-- ':)
~
-(
(
7 6 In
,'5
@-
109
. I C1
..,
.- - cHEsfNUT - --
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5
10 9
8
Q
Q
t.
f'l
C
r-.
-l/1
l(t ~ g
I:>
..,
10
IQ
..,
IQ
co
.,
00
Q
\t)
10
15
"
- ....... ..
...,
l:>
,.
~
\t}
~
~
..,
'a
.,
C
"'
t; ~
" I-
B
-
~
CHfo;STNU'1
COUnT
CONDO
U2-02
~o
~
smEET
~ ~~::;~ ~ ~~
\0 '0\0 \Qta en 'O\()
J
4
5
2
)
2
J
4
(3
2
.....
0---
10 9
8 7
6
10 9
N
o
t> I_
o
"
..
o
I.
~~
I.) 0
t- "
7
8
~
10
'"
-
to
:! ~ ~
IQ CO to
-0 N-" 5~5ii 704i -
- - l - - -- ---
-- -- -1- -- --
~. ~ I ~ l; ~ -.
,. ,. ""
1 0
2 13 ~ 5
2'\ l_ ---
V--I---'-
9 \8 7 6
I
7
5
13
o
to
-,. !'?
to
s mEET
-.- \'-'- .-.---
~ t ?? ~
<0 '<l '" 10
2 .3 4
o
o
,-
N
~ J~
10 tQ
C C
I'- I'-
w
:::>
;r.
~ -.
-(
~07 /2
fj.7
7
~
co
o
"
o
'0
...
I 7
~
~ \7. 31
609
1\ 9
10
11
16-- H- lJ_ "8 \...
, t'
B
JO 7.9 .8 27
",
'C'
I
"J
<f)
ri
ci
~
-
--,
I
tQ <:) I..
~ 0; OJ
,--
TURNER ST
~
~ .
tQ
10
o
~l
'V
o
a,
10
~
o
'0
II}
! a1'/~;;it:.: ,:;JI.
~ "II~ ~
~ :tti1{i~
I~ :06 - _:..:", -
:1: (3 I 5 ~ ~3 1 ~
t) ,0"1
N
~'
"I ~()P
.- ...
'" Q
, 6ff tQ
~9----
a;-- -, ,-
~ I
I
5 __ J
G~
~
- 10- ~
~ g
:: ;- ~.-
'" cot 0'1
5
7
8
<1
6
e-
J
I - -2-
liO-f
fJl 0 tJ
0:
~
o
a.:
u.
-f;
~]. _ _ 1_.30 7.9 2J3
fi 0 7 'f-..
17 26
.. to C f'l ...
C) (:J..............
R M~8~ ~ a,
11
9
25
.09
- - - "---
~~
,
N
h
'0
61/
-~- -\- ~ -~- -~- ~.~
__.1-:_ :
..
Ot
;j- ~
.. ..
'" ....
~ 70 f ti ~ g:
(1 'tl rtJ q;,
i, O. .
lri WI!. .:.
5 1 2 J 4 5 <\ 2 702
--x _ ___ -h5 _ (3-81 J
70.. ~
708
6 ISH 13 1 2 1 i15 - 9-
h
ru
700
s-
f 05
--1 - 2 - J 4 5 6 7 B
03" ._. __ _ _ _ _, -0
32 31 30
29 28 27 26 25
t]>
~ -4
01 'Cl
.(\ 6
8 ~
m
to
Q
01
"t
I:)
a,
tQ
Q
OJ
N
o
<lJ
~
a,
60
!l:
C)
o
~T' , ,~~R~~~ I
R..t)
I.. I I . I I \ ~ _ r ~
f .
lInt,
Ul I I I
'-I
.
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and REZONING
QWt-lEn
APPLICANT
.
,
.~
\
i
~
.
~
i
~
~i
~
~
N~W'?OR\
alL
C.C,R?
'-LAND USE PLAN
zQ3-o6
Lupq3-11
OL
PROPERTY DEscnlPTION
LOa ~ 1 PA A"T LoTS \ ~ "4-\
~Lk 1-1.....,
T\'\AG.NOL-tA PP.RK
ZONING
FRO M R E: 5 t D E."-l, I A L lot:' F \ c.. E.
TO coMMC:RCIIllL G6.ufi~ AL
PLANNING Ilnd ZONING BOAno
TOWNSHIP '1.<1 s
8 ~ Bu 5 IN E S S
SECTIOH \S
.Slno'. Family
C-N
0.5'3 AcnES
CITY COMMISSION
flANGE \S- E ATLAS PAGE '2..q G f::\
CT'(= C.O\JNTY BlO~ A~DUPLEX.
V'Yf\C^1
,',i.:
'\
'.'
"
"
,...,:~; ,~..
'~ :f ~,
,"
AGENDA
..OATE
L/)
-
'1
9~~
iTEM #
~~~
~a91
......~-..-.:... -_.......~...,. f,t 'f
, ~ ., . .', . tJ
:!',
, - \ '~
.>,'
~ a3
*Revised 9-23-93
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5405-93
1. In the last line of the title, change "INDUSTRIAL" to read
II I NDUSTR I AL Gll'N'm;f~A1L II
:-:-:.,.;.:.;.;.;.;.;.:-:.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.
2. In Section 1, after liTo:" change llIndustrial" to read "Industrial
~~W~~a)~ II I
~:~;!l~~l:j:;:~;ji~t .
3. In Section 3, delete", and subject to the approval of the land use
designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners. The Oirector
of Planning and Development is authorized to transmit to the Pinellas County
Planning Council an appl ication to amend the Countywide Plan in order to achieve
consistency with the Future Land Use Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan as amended by this ordinancell.
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5296-92 re: PPC consistency and Ordinance
5312-92 re: comprehensive plan amendments were adopted changing the name of the
land use category from "Industrialll to "Industrial General" and this land use
plan amendment will not need county approval.
..', ,
ORDINANCE NO. 5405-93
M~ or~DINANCE OF TilE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
Af-1ENDI NG TilE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENS I VE PLAN OF TIlE Cl TY, TO C\lANGE TItE LAND USE
DESI GNAT ION FOR CERT AI N REAL PROPERT'( LOCATED ALONG TilE
NORTII RIGIIT-OF-HAY LINE OF THE SEABOARD COAST RAILROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 1,180 FEET ~JEST OF IIERCULES AVENUE,
CONS I'ST I NG OF A PAHCEL OF PROPElny LOCATED I N SECT IONS 1
AND 12, TOWNSII I r 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, FRor~
UNCLASSIFIED TO INDUSTRIAL; PHOVIDINGAN EFFECTIVE DATE.
HHEREAS, the alllendmen t to the fu lllre 1 and use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be
reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compl iance with Florida law; now,
therefore,
BE IT OHDAINED BY TIlE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Sect i on 1. The future 1 and us e r> 1 il n e 1 eJllent of the Comprehens i ve Plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
Property
See Exhibit A attached.
(LUP93-08)
land Use Cateqorv
From: Unclassified
To: Industrial
Section 2. The City COl1lmission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adopt ion of Ordinance 5404-93, and subject to
the approva 1 of the 1 and use des i gna t i on by tile Pine 11 as County Board of County
Commiss loners. The Director of Planning and Development is authorized to
transmit to the Pinel1as County P'liHlIling Council an application to alllend the
Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan
Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as i1Illencled by this ordinance.
PASSED ON FlI~ST IlEMHNG
PASSED ON SECOND AND FIN^L
READING AND ADOP1EO
July 1, 1993
iH1J1Garvey, Mayor-Commiss ioner
Approved as to form and correctness~
^tu~st:
City Attorney
Cynth i it E. Goudeau, C i.ty Clerk
\,1
.,
',I
1
'..,
I
j
i
"'
, "
, 1...
EXHIBIT A
)
.
'.,
,.
_ ~If~,~~~~~ '
'~"""""'"
r .:. ,.'{ . '~'I ~;;". : .'. .... ';".
.~. "r' :.., 'I :11..'. .. "," '1- to"
'.':; ~'" i...',.".:. -'j
28::':' ~':I' :~~I,~j.~~,i,
, a::::" ... ..,.,. .,.. ".,
.:'.; "'" . :,,~:,:\ ': :.".,t. ~..'~
:., ' . "Il'; :,., , :: .,.,'
:::;.t;.:~, ~~~;'j)r
~"l/J\/
I Cot> V t.J I Y
"'/"1/1
..J./ L I
... .- - - -
l:.,CJ /J I Iv 6
I. .111 .' t ".'1. '?
I .rl~" '"
~ t.( I :z 7
3 If f 35:
'I
I
I - ~ V)
. ~
~ a
ffi .
0:
" :I: 0
. :z. 17(0
"
'2 4/35
0 ,
tJ
. -
I "
).. 'r ;;' '.'
I. . .. .t
.. _,~ ~,:'f.; . ' .
v... ,'. :.~",.,
.c...... I' ~~.. ';'i'
~~:~) .~.~.....
\'\'Ir~
~.: f.." . '0' . :. .
',1;' \A. \.,.4. :....
O'~ I.:'-i-' .....: 4.! " ,
.,.. \:.. I
~-
:'J ,1 I? r?
"
~
,
.~~
.~
~
i
,
J,
,/
"
~
~.
~ ?8
IJ'
~
'.\';
it
\
'<
,i
r---
.......+.~~.+....+..+..++.
..............
~..
60
75
o
C'oI
I
C71
o
<0
IL)
I'~
1'1
II'
;~
1'1
1660
75
,__ -L
60
QWHER
APPLlCAHT
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and ZONING
A Q'3-DG
TR A ~ ~ F'"o A\^:" GlZS I
\ tJ c....
~UP'q3-0B
\ '" ST R v J'V\ E:..,T
FROM
U tv c c.. A 5 ~ (F ( ED
COUNTY
M - 'L <C~
M - I
PROPERTY DESCJlIPTJOU
(h~'t'c;. "34-1..7 PAl!.T "-31(135"" SEe. 1-2.'i" 15'"
pnn.T t'V\~~ :1..1'0\ see..- \2..."2.,.q-l5"
S-.7~AC:~~~
LAND USE PLAN
ZONING
_..,.
~
3
f
~
,
1;
niGHT OF WAY
TO
lNou~TR.\AL.
\t-
ACRES
I
PLANNING nnd ZOHING DOARO CIT,y COMMI9Sl0H
,
SE.CTION \~l'2.. TOWNSHIP 1.'1 S nAHOE LS E (I ~ TlAS PAOE 162A fit 2.71A
..
0 - \:>U5lUC::SS \/= V A c. ^ JJI ~;-r- 0:" ~TD(.2. A G G
I
I
""
'"
...,....:., -'..,.'
~q
, D/'1/13
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 5406-93
In S'ect ion 4 I I de 1 ete II, and subject to approva 1 of the 1 and use category
set forth in Ordinance No. 5405-93, by the Pinellas County Board of County
Commissionersll.
NOTE: On Septembe~ 16, 1993, Ordinance 5296-92 re: ppe consistency and Ordinance
5312-92 re: comprehensive plan amendments were adopted; therefore, the land use
plan amendment does not have to be approved by the county.
. ,.1
';,j
, .,. \... .'..., ... ;~J
ORDINANCE NO. 5406-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA;
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG TilE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF THE SEABOARD COAST RAILROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,180 FEET
WEST OF HERCULES AVENUE, CONSI STI NG OF A PARCEL OF
PROPERTY LOCATED I N SECT IONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHI P 29
SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY
HEREIN, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS
LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (IL); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth
in th is ord i nance is found to be reasonab 1 e, proper and appropri ate, and in
compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County,
Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of
Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
See Exhibit A attached.
(A93-06)
Zoninq District
IL - Limited Industrial
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5404-93, and subject
to approval of the land use category set forth in Ordinance No. 5405-93, by the
Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
July 1, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
M. A. Galbraith,
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
i':
.'
1
. !
,;
"j
i
i
!
I
i
,
,"';
'!. .
, ',',,;
. " ~
. .: ~ ";
" I ':.\ "
-....
"'.
, ..
't>': .
, ,
\ '. ,~,~
c, ..', .
, , . .,
;0':-". i ."....~ > ;..
;:.' '~. ': , '.:' ~
Commence at the South 1/4 corner, the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section I, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida; thence run
N 8902115411 W, 50.01 feet along the South boundary of said Section I, to a point
on the West right-of-way line of Hercules Avenue; thence S 0018113" W, 171.55
feet, along the West right-of-way line of said Hercules Avenue to a point of
intersection with the North right-of-way line of the Seaboard System Railroad;
thence N 72054'3811 W, 355.97 feet along said North right-of-way 1 ine, for a Point
of Beginning; thence from this Point of Beginning continue N 72054138" W, 783.05
feet along said North right-of-way line; thence N 4045132" W, 302.B2 feet; thence
N 0012'5511 W, 60.00 feet to the Southwest corner of Calumet Street; thence S
89018152" E, 20 feet; thence S 0012'5511 E, 58.89 feet; thence S 4045132" E,
121.66 feet; thence S 89018152" E, 572.19 feet; thence N 0041'08" E, 180.00 feet;
thence S 89018'5211 E, 165.90 feet; thence S 0019'3011 E, 582.76 feet to the Point
of Beginning. '
" ,....-.,:-
, : :: ~ ,:--.. ::-
", ' ,. ,',.'
. . <";{~
',.' ,~;
.',.:'rS
',"l-
".,;.
',.'r"
','
,;"'.'
;..,
i .' "j~~
.':}
" :;:7,
"";;-.:/:\t
" ,":: ~t:):
, " ',,;r~
',' u. " :,..,'?:)
, <'.<~;.:~
\.. ".',J:.'
, . .)~
;,_, ",'/.
','. >~::.~
" ....:.'..b
';- '/::i~
':~' . ,:.,~t~!
, ': ~,,~
EXHIBIT A
~, .'.)~f
,",~
,; ,~
.':'.:ft
'"
" '
.:'.;
'. .~
< ,1;
t',f'
. .,..,> ": ~~. ';:',,~ ",;>~,'.{:<,:,;~\..;;:;:,~,~;, :,.;;,;;;/: :,i, i.,;;~:;\;;tt<i;;,t"d~;,,{~:t~~
'660
_L75
l.
l,.~:';:r~'i'.',?1> '!: ~:(
i.~'I~:lj.~.}:'~ :;:;, ~.~,~: y
~,:~~~ 1:~:f.F/~;~~)5
, ",,,,,. ,~,'.' ,.~, .
.t. ...:"'~ . r....'~ ........-....~.~I
- ' . 'I ':"':"r:'; ....;.:.j.~,..J:~'.
~I' t ;~t...~~,. "1' I:'
t~~::: I ~~L':"~ "::':~.~;~
::'~'k': :~2,lo-:'.i~i
28 ..... I " '....' '/' ..
. t..." ,'" ...'1'. .l,' ",~
':~~'}:~) ~t~~~:~.....:~::1.:~~~:
:~:,;::i-tJ ~~.:~:. fl'J' "J
"t,t::"~'1 ':?~, ,JJ'
'..~.t.........1 ~>1 ......, rl~. ,~.
:.:i";':I'~~": t:r:::;::\:' ;'.;.'~~:~~
I.. _ ".' I "'~. ,I' ',"
. . .0...'
.....',... '0' .... .,l . t., 't r.
':~='~'i.'" . \ :~'..,: ~ h:-....':.:
!:.:.:: :::14~~.d~9....
.".....\.. ". ,..c.. ,....... '0
,..,td:~, :,:l,:':"~ii!j ....~..:'
\. ....:.. :~.y.:(t. .r..~ :~~)~::
.'. ..~. . '. ".J '..,... .,1'; :
~,: : : ',::,(, ~.,' :~:;;:~: }l1;;i~;~
1t;'. ':~i,: .,
, . t.'
(I "'. ,I).. '
"f;': ';I,
" ..~" 1\" 'tl"
" . '." '.' #
.' '.....' \ " I
tl/ J\ /
) c.C>I..I/J', Y
I
.J'~~~'l',! I
z.. 0 ~.) I N (J
,'.. ,'" ',', I
.1'1' "
I ,,' t '11 "I
~ t{ I A. 7
:, If ( 3~
'I
~ ,
::>' I
.J
I - ~
I \()
N
~ , a ...
ffi .
D::,
" :I: 0
I =2- 1710
"
:1 4/36
0 . ,
tJ I"-
,
I ot'
)- '~' ',' rn '
I, ,j- I . : I
t- t ,,' '~ .'4...... C> . '"
;) . ;"~":'~",j,. ~~. ,;
\I,.. ...'~...~.~"..' . ."
...~.."jf .':r'(~ '. ,.
) I .' ~. ..',I
~~:~:; '~'~ .~.~ ~~:
0 , "\'If" 'f :J..
\.: f...". . '.. . .... , .. I
','!' \01, .... . .
.~ .,:. . ~, ,
.. ... ..... ..
,." \ ' . .' I
. "
rvl-2
3'1/2T?
LUP
I 17 (0
-.---.-----iff~~l...:J' -
t. .
, I
I
~'
_ G__ ,__.,.__ ______' :.__
(' -
,........+..+...++~++.t.++.
............
..
~.
?B
W
:::l
9
'<
)
60
75
7j
~
~
,j
'i
o
N
I
l1>
rJ
III
Vl
fiO
i
,j
,
"
:~
,
I.
J
~~
,I
OWNER
Ar PLlC~U T
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and ZONING
A, qj-DG
TR A JJ ~ Fa A. ,^:,612. S
I tJ c....
L U p' q =3 - 0 8
\tJ5TRU ME:)JT
pnfl.\'
'3 L{ . '2. 7
tv\~-e,
DEscnlPTIOH
r A ~ T '3 It I '35' s E Co \ - J. ~
see- L2.~'1-q.lo
- I
s-
LAND
USE
PLAN
ZONl NG
pnop r:nTY
(h {{ ~ .~
Ii
l:
~
~
.2..1' 0 \
FROM
u r'-' C (. A 5' ~ I F ( E.D
COlJUTY
M - '2. ~
(1.1-1
S-.7!;' t'\ C Vl es
-~'
~
"
niGHT OF W^,Y
TO
\ N D LJ ~ T R\ A L.
It.-
~CRES
v;=.
-------[
~Lq s nl\NOE l5"
V ^ c. ^ UI" Slo.\
"
I
j
CIT." COMM1SSIOH
I
P L A tH"'1 tt G II n d Z 0 H I U a 0 0 A n 0
SECTION l CC; \'2.
\3-\)U$loESS
TOWNStllP
E
^ TlAS P~OE 261 A 'it
~ T D (J.. A, (; G
2.71 A
. . "
'.
.' r ~ {
,':
as
IDI '7/13
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 5408-93
In the title, in the next to the last line, change "COMMERCIAL/TOURIST
FACILITIES" to read, IIRESIOENTIALfOFFICE/RETAIL.1I
In Section 1, after liTo: II change "Commercial/Tourist Facilities" to read
"Residential/Office/Retail.1I
3. In Section 3, delete II, and subject to the approval of the land use
designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners. The Director
of Planning and Development is authorized to transmit to the Pinel1as County
Planning Council an application to amend the Countywide Plan in order to achieve
consistency with the Future Land Use Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan as amended by this ordinance".
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5296-92 re: ppe consistency and Ordinance
5312-92 re: comprehensive plan amendments were adopted changing the name of the
land use category from "Commercial/Tourist Facilities" to "Residential/Office/
Retailll and this land use plan amendment will not need county approval.
"
".j
,:1
;',-\
!
:.J
, : ,-j
.. . ,~j
\"...:.:'...,:...'-;':,:>;>:.i.:.
ORDINANCE NO. 5408-93
AN ORDINANCE OF TilE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA.
A~1END I NG THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREIIENSIVE PLAN OF TilE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ONE BLOCK
EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY 19, APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET SOUTH OF
SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF LOTS 8 AND 9, HILL-TOP
SU13DIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2633 HARBOR
CIRCLE, FROM UNCLASSIFIED TO COMMERCIAL/TOURIST
FACILITIES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to he
reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law, now,
therefore,
O[ IT orWAINED OY TilE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The flJture land use plan element of the comprehensive planpf
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for t~e
hereinafter described property as follows:
Land Use Cateqor~
From: Unclassified
Property
Lots 8 and 9, Hill-Top Subdivision,
according to the map or plat thereof
as recorded in Plat Book 29, Page 84,
of the public records of Pinellas
County, Florida. (LUP93-14)
Sect i on 2. The City Comllli s s i on does hereby cert i fy that th i s ordinance is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
To: Commercial/Tourist Facilities
Section 3. This ordinance sh~ll take effect immediately upon adoption.
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5407-93, and subject
to the approva 1 of the 1 and use des i gnat ion by the Pine 11 as County Board of
Coun ty COfllm is s i oners . The Director of P 1 ann i ng and Deve lopment is author i zed to
transmi t to the P; ne 11 as County P 1 ann i ng Counc il an app 1 icat ion to amend the
Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan
Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended by this ordinance.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
I.Tuly 1, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
\ 1/
II ('l ~
, 'u '''ll ~
;; -
.~
; I' ' " '" : : ::' I \ I v \ I \ I ';~ '. , '.
"'~'~' ~/\..I~I\:::I-:~~~I \'_._ t,\I\~_I\?1 "r.~l]d^,>~~;", '11\ I~/\,l~
~'. .!.~ () ..ll J.~ ..G .- .! ([ '. .. l ' '
'I 'II ,_. E .- -I ' . '"'- . I ~I . .
~'t;I' ~~\';'iS~~L~~\,~~~~:yi~/\:'i",,1 :'" t:J'~' -::I'~'
:.:~:;tj~::;J;....
Pt ,,, c:-. "" ell fill ..,.. ....
..-.'--.'..;: ';/"'0'/
I 1r; C't: IYCP ( C)
(-I ,j/()~i '~'U ~
"^'WOf{ ~;(JlJ^n[
~IIOI'/'1t It:
CUllrll
/1' 16
I,. 1', C.J l'l
U . - C ,-
I ) ..'......... .......
~/()Ii '. ", .....
,~ " 'J j JI )/1 1'1
/ "I " 1 r'l
"I (' I ( I << I
I I I I
':;' ., Q
'<, It) PI
)'1 )I '1
- - , .. '. - .- -.--.-- _.- --- -- ---- ---
,
"
lOt
/,1
111')
n' #.1 //l
IV"
If] r" ,4
...,.__...,....____ ___.~ '~ q .H l'H
I V , 7
',' . I I ',I I,
- ... ..,- ...
:\
,:1
)W lIEn
, p ,. l. I C ^ , I r
rV, c. t .. J \: \ L l. I C; C I
5 U tI S [1 POI 11 T R
t . ______. _.- -.-._ _. (:') f{ ..
: >}"" ~L=, :-~" ,- r"C"lr~~' ~s :"~"i.~~~
:~II ,r~ II..~~' 'i l' 'I I~,~'~ Ilq (~'II\I \I'm' 11m, ~~l ~ .iii}: ~~/~,~
" ' i.lI I i I I I ,.! 1i~1 J I ~p ~Th I . I I~j I~' ,~. i'
! ~ ).': ,:~ C 0 v ,J T '( '2 0 ~, \ P (,. n . l I L U ( ) ,rv1 ~'il! 1~1'!'I:;'i';::'~I:: ,~.
I ~~. I ""C''''I! \ '1~11.:... .0'
F '~:i~i~ll 111tll'" 'It ~"f!J li' '-Ill'" .:;'1t)'l~r.I.I(..S(; I~i"'~"i! ;'fy)':!1. a'iIX';!" ;;":1' .;, r:':li!::'iQ; .1.
'} AI p" r !11;1K~:II\If.i~:, :u~!if'dll:l Ii li1Iill'I~~M Ki~ii~J;I,!: iJi~'I~jll~lj ;~I,UI,;!I~~ Uli~ ll!~il~i! ~i:llri~J:lJll;:l UI'~i!il': n~'lfifm ifJ.I;~!~!11 i,N;Nli:', n,,:y!
- I j\ ", 'I~I'I' t"I""'" "'h..' "', 'I'~'l .. 'II"" ,,' ',I 'I~" 1"1,,1"'" '(" .'.' ,'J,.I ....1' .,
2 ;:!, ~!:'i! i~'!!~~:;' I :11~11'~i"~~I: 1,1,"1'fl:,I;,' ;jli~~'; !~~' /'11: ~I'11 Ii: '~I'~;'!I" 1~:I;I~i~!i~"! :1~!llil!I";I; ~~i!:~:!.:!i::n: '.!?
". 'I""'" "'." ,'{ """Id'fl'I' :1;\ " I' '~~'lf'~'" !,', "I'''~' 1"'~I'I':"'I.,,.t'l.
ij ~ :~! ;:1:: l!~' !~r ~(.f: fiii ill. :I~ 'iit.~ II;!;': 'Nil :I~: ;)i !!I;l~ 1fi! I ;p ii~ · iJI: : 1,:1: i~H '~!ii: W ;;:~~i!i:i!{W;:!!:j[t
-.u: .4 't""1 '".: .;.:. . ~. ".:L: .;;' ~J' :~ ,...~' ~ .~~ ...d ~.. !.:; .. . "~" ..,1 .' ~lJ.r:1;'~~:
- . - .,-- '"-"" '_h..__ - 'I~I' ;;'j' ;i'~\ "I' ~'i~I:j1" -~,., .~it!;;'~"li: f~~I~ ~"I"II:~: I'lllff' ;Ai:,; 'I'~~'-I\r;' ~~::ft~. ',; :;':I:';~"I~ 'I, ~w:. !6!~~,;:: ~'~' ;I~:('::':' ~t~:
. \' 'I ,.."'.' :,.. 'II' , I' ""1'1 ",':Jill ~ 'I' ,lIj. ./' . 'f" il'I'; ') ':1; ,:. ~ 'I JI'I"n" '"~ ," ~'
': '; j' I";:": ,:r ji'" :"i:l~ : I':i~' :" 1'1;' ....' n !II) : i i l ~,!: .: :1;. ~I'l: 11 'j: ~'i'I,rri' i::~ :i, . ~J I
1~;~17;JICJ,'1./f'~)11 ;~[j~l~;l :j~l!iM i~!l:~ lj!t~;il:l ~ii!.m: '~jtt:MM~:nlli~il ijm1i.i'I" !l~]ir il;".:1 f~I~I.' tl~~]:~)A:
r: ~ M~~' ~ '! llt~, (~~~ 1,ii';' ,:li:~~!~:! '~il;\I! ~;; ii'lg\ ']a:1iil' ~Ilil: [:;;~I~j!!i I;H':i~'j~ ~!~I(~:!;~ ~'~ ~i l;i~'!:l!All i f ~'15T: ';~! l &
4.l:~_~";f' I ~ I, !1.1~1!'~'I: ':\"1~!1 ~!;:, .1\,' '~l' ~M :(I~ ~': !I.,IM~~ 1 H ,.1:/J" 'f,~I::~:'!I; 'I' ,I! ',I,.~ :. nl,l; ..,:; :I'i!. .,'
~.-:""""-';-1"'r'~:J;a:"I'~."~ ., :,'l:l:~:.\r!., 'I . I I I 1 . 0 II" 'j ,.'n ~ "11' 11~1: I ,'I~' I,,\{, t!1 (,W' g.'f. ,.r: ~Jl' , 'li:1"; ," ~'f
'!r!~~1~!fJ.!i~M,li~i!I;::~:i~I'r.~il~l;nlWli:;iii ~i~;~i~~~1 ;ii;~1i!: :l~l!i,ii :.~ ~ikR~: ~if;irt ::t~,ji~ ' :ill~~L i !;I~!~i ,'r&~l lid! ~iJI'~l:Ji ~hii! l: (,[,~, J;~J
11'!~~II~!II';\~Ir.I'II,I'lli'I~:I:il'l~ i~I'~I'(~I~III'I'I;: j~~~til:!4;~ ~l' :11'i!H!!:;I~~I'~~~i!i !i;:i:'~':~!ll\;~::II'I'l :i::I:;I,rll!:il:!~:;:'I'I!~11 !li::I;~I':ll!i !~I!I~ ;,'i:~:I::rl !~'I~i/!':i!I:!':il:;!I':::~;:?1:i: :"i)'::P:":';;! i~':i'::-:!i !:'~i"
""I'.~~I~!H'" "1;/1' 'II~US/l" I: I k.6!)~"" ,I' '1' ,"'1,,""'," '\l1\.J'{ n"l "'I "I':i ":J '1"'1;1"':1" '",', ":l": ...JI!;".'.".,!"',..I"..,," I,.~I':I" I),':j:'"
,1~~t;~IJp!~;~i W't.~I':'! i'.I~IIIIlI~I',Il::l,:~!: ,1:: . ;I\,IIt,~ 'J: /:;/rl;1;:V'.}~;!l:n::!::~~i' :m:;,l! 'i~ll~f/:ll'; ,;';!;:I~::;~'!!I.::iil:i;;;I:,'; 1~!lii~Pl"I' !11'li~:I:hli: !~:m;r ;~::~;~i!!!+i;;i)~!,Gli;~i~: 'l'p; :,; :':. ;:i;:
., ..11 ,~ ij i>."'''. ., \i ".... . 'l ~ ,.......----\_ -~.. 4'.', ...-_....~..."-...T-.. ,,_......,,6.4 \ '~'l t.;J....."....1-"'t.tyt4~- ,I ...1', (......--1
_________ "_ . 0, . ..t., 00 'I' .\
pr10POSEI1. Af'U'lEX^'rION i
LAf\J() US[~ PLAf'J ^Mi~r~LJMEr\rr Clfld ZONING !
-.-.- .------ -- --_..,-------'-------------'.1
^ q'3-oq. L\lp'Q3-\1.\ i
I
I
I
I
';
~
-~~
~;
'/10
(1-
I()eI
(j)
:)
... - ~;:: ::: 1
I
1110
~
'I.
~
Ii
~l
,;
....;
'"
.,
~~
~}.
6
;~
i!
l:) . \ <. 0,
L /\ r.ll) U~) r~ P L ^ t-l
Z LJ t-II f'J l;
I' 110 P f: 111 Y n l: r. C IIII' TI 0 t I
l- D . \"5 ~) ~:, q)
\ ,\ \ l. L TO'') -s \.J \2>
- - _. -, - -p -.- ~- -.- .~_...._.- ..-. .... .,. .-..-..-........--.------ ~-_.- --_.~_._-. .,,--,_..-
F 110M U IJ c. c. 1\ -;.. ,.; IF' 1 C'~ D
GO U II lye: P - '2_
TO "l= $1 ~E'NTI A L / 0 p; f::- J cej
p.., ~-rA I L
-1
C l-y
---. t- -,-----.----.- --,
I1IGIIT Of W^Y
o"'-)?J ^CtlES
ACrlES
~-~.~~~'~;--:_I~-~, ;.l)'t_;,~!~.~1 U () ~'!',-~'~"'~":'" ,:~_~~:-.._~._-'.._~.~~::.-~~~,~ L~~~~.'-'c'~ ~-~ 0 ~~~AJ n f, ;O~=-=~=~_
SECTlOII O~) '1 ()\,{'I~;IIII' ').'l!i "^I(Of: u.,; E I "flAg rAnr: 'L!J S" J\
". ... ~ -..-....- ... . . --.- -. -.. --. - _.-~.._._- ---,-...-
. II j' 11 '1 \,' F.~. tH; I v
I ~.. \ \" 'I , II t ','.
If I . I . 1\ t 1 (\ P \. h f r:- t l'\~;
, ' '. ." . , .. ~ J '-,,' . , '. .
.;,
':".,
~~.~~
a"
) 0 I '7/9'1
,::\
. "it
.-<;'
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5409-93
In Section 4, delete
set forth in Ordinance No.
Commissionersll. '
II, and subject to
5408-93, by the
approval of the land use category
P 1 ne 11 as County Board of County
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5296-92 re: ppe consistency and Ordinance
5312-92 re: cOlnprehensive plan amendments were adopted; therefore, the land use
plan amendment does not have to be approved by the county.
.,'
...':
..~. .
ORDINANCE NO. 5409-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARHATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ONE BLOCK EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY 19,
APPROX H1A TEL Y 250 FEET SOUTH OF SUNSET PO I NT ROAD,
CONSISTING OF LOTS 8 AND 9, HILL-TOP SUBDIVISION, WHOSE
POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2633 HARBOR CIRCLE, AS DESCRIBED
MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, AS GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth
in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in
compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CO~1MISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County,
Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of
Clearwater, and tile zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Propert'[
Lots 8 and 9, Hill-Top Subdivision,
according to the map or plat thereof
as recorded in Plat Book 29, Page 84,
of the public records of Pinellas County,
Florida. (A93-09)
Zonina District
CG - General Commercial
Sect ion 2. The City Camilli s s i on does hereby cert ify that th i s ord i nance is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
Sect i on 3. The P 1 ann i ng and Deve 1 opment Director is directed to rev i se the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5407-93, and subject
to approval of the land use category set forth in Ordinance No. 5408-93, by the
Pin ell a s Co U n t y Boa r' d 0 f COli n t y Co III III i S 5 ion e r s .
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
July 1, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
1(10
· I hli,~I__,LijLi'I_!~)H' ::,'.' It \\v\(-\ II~:111~.l"I~ -'.r 1\.11'1~ j:~~~ )'1.:.
).(,?Z~l i:~I-~ ~l-' \""t~\ ~.~\ -~~ l- \}~\--.: \ ;'1\ iij'( AP::!o,- 'I ~ ij y ~ g' ~ -:; ~1T~ ~1:;~~)
1 r< .." [) . It ..!~ - ~~ . -- ! ~ (E. !, - . ," ':' .'.' ~r.J'~"" .j'
- -- -- '..:. . v ._ -.. -- ...... ..-..- ---.- ----. --- ---. ,- .- ~ :.......r';1'1\:.
- ~) ;1 '- 11' ~ r) I, ,h . I I ,__., ._.. ___ ___ .. ,..",. '," .' ..
l> 0 ( (>"'- .:.- It r, - - -'E'- '--- 111" "'1:,::'1:.1,:
.::. :.:. '=-. >>,- _ _:::. .:.::. .._:-~~. ~-- ~\' -'::'-1:' \ ' '\: y" '\7 \.0 2lHlJ .00 1 UO 110 111 1\ I 11n 1\ n 00 ~; h~\;1:'J C
~" -;. :~- \~ \~~ \~'\~ ~~) ~ ~~ 'l. \','.. '(. ~;.~ .. _ _ _ ' .' ,~ ;';/V!}hri:
- ~ I ~ ~ :; ~j tj ~: :; J~ ......-- _\ - L__ -- - , i ': n~;i~.\i,Hl~
"" tlilo " (lilI " "" t'l .... ~'\oI~,,:~.'1 ,:.,.
I I --_.....-.,~ "It. .:.,..~,"',.t.,':
\ r" (, / . i ''''~''', ".
, " I (1- C '(4~.... 19 F 11 t.11 ::!I~l,S~',~1
I ~' ~~\ C G FI",~\di\'I:i
, . j ..J .: '-I, <\,.!' ':
, .,' 2" I()'- ,~:.!, ":~,""~,:"fj'!
J: (,I ,) I .) ,~:l ," :! ',l,!: :'
t 1/ c.t- .," 0"
~, . IlAIlIIOf{ ~jUlJA/l( I. O. ~ ~ tl!5;:~,j~b ,
~~IIO('J'''IC IIIf6 / ~~_ ~,'- "'" ".:.',:~n,:!":. ~
eLlllf" 2_~ (lll "1 2,~/()B ~-~ n n ~ (:~ ';
1111,' ('I ('.J ... 0
, p ( 7 I P f " A '" '<) '"
___2 '1/ (/ tz..._____.____________,__.:._'!_!2.I~ L__ __ _,___,._ ____ .,_,~ ____, XI 71
II
,~) ]
)0'
')
; ,
CJ
- ~
o
.'
S LJ t~ S E l
8
...
0-
--
. ~
(f) .,
:) B
-- .........
f~ M
IOU IUO 2f:\, p'r
lO
-,
!~!
l.
"
,\
",
..;
'.;!
I::
,
" !
,\
,I
, I
, ;
,
pr10POSEI~, ANNEX^l"JON
. . ...:
LANl) lJSE Pl_AN ^MEr'-JDMEr~-r and ZONING
IWHEn
,fl P L Ie ^ III
("ll c.... hJ E \ L L, G El f~. \<. "
^ q'3- oq
L UP' q ~ - \ L\
L^r'~D USE PLAN
ZCJNING
I'IIOP[lITY DJ.;SCIlIP1IOlf
l-. D -T 5 e C, (~'l
\ \ \ L 1_ TOP S u F..>
-------"""---_._._---_._~-----,
U tJ C- C f\ S <; I r:- I E 0
COli r I 1 Y C. P - 2_
H E SID CS ,...> T , A L-- I
OFF\c.e I R ETA ( L
cG
-----t------
IIIGlll or- w^y
0.:3-:\ ^CnES
,,'., :."
, *,:\
,e" ...'
','
l' 0,:"
.':..
~ ;;(7
Revised 9-24-93
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5439-93
1. In the title, in the next to the last line, change "INDUSTRIAL" to
read "INDUSTRIAL GENERAL FOR PARCEL All AND "INDUSTRIAL LIMITED FOR PARCEL B".
2. In Section I, after liTo:"
,
change "Industrial"
to read: "Industrial General - Parcel A
Industrial Limited - Parcel 8"
3. Substitute Exhibit A with the revised Exhibit A attached hereto.
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5296-92 (PPC consistency) and Ordinance
5312.92 (comprehensive plan amendments) were adopted changing the name of the
land use category from "Industrial" to "Industrial General" or "Industrial
Limited." The land use classification for this parcel is being split to be
consister)t with the countywide future land use plan categories.
- . '.,. '.} ," c~ " ' . " ;'
. ,..;. .,,~ : .';, ,.,'! '
",' .
". 'j ,
~, , '
, ~. . '
~~:', 1', 'i"~~ ,
".; ,.
..: .;..;.
Parcel A
Commence at the Southeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 1, Township 29 South, Range 15 East,
Pinellas County, Florida, and go N 00017'48" W, 561.56 feet, along
the North-South centerline of said Section 1 - the centerline of
Hercules Avenue and its northerly projection - the East boundary of
the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 1; thence N
89017'17" W, 428.00 feet; thence N 00017'48" W, 108.00 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N 00017148" W, 147.21 feet; thence S
89011122" E, 100.00 feet; thence S 00017148" E, 147.04 feet; thence
N 89017117" W, 100.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, except the
Easterly 22.00 feet thereof.
Parcel B
The Easterly 22.00 feet of the parcel described as follows:
. Commence at the Southeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 1, Township 29 South, Range 15 East,
Pinellas County, Florida, and go N 00017'48" W, 561.56 feet, along
the North-South centerline of said Section 1 - the centerline of
Hercules Avenue and its northerly projection - the East boundary of
the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 1; thence N
89017117" W, 428.00 feet; thence N 00017148" W, 108.00 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N 00017148" W, 147.21 feet; thence S
89011122" E, 100.00 feet; thence S 00017148" E, 147.04 feet; thence.
N 89017'17" W, 100.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, except the
Easterly 22.00 feet thereof.
. EXHIBIT A
I
'I
i
"
,-, ,. i."
.. ':::.,
ORDINANCE NO. 5439-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF
THE SEABOARD COAST RAILROAD, SOUTH OF CALUMET STREET,
AND WEST OF HERCULES AVENUE, IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 29
SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, FROM UNCLASSIFIED TO INDUSTRIAL;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
",'
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future 1 and use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be
reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Property
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
(LUP 93-22)
Land Use Cateaory
From: Unclassified
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of
the City of Clearwater is amended by changing the land use category for the
hereinafter described property as follows:
To: Industrial
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance 'shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5438-93.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
August 19, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Cyntfiia E.-Goudeau
City Clerk
.., . . ~ ", . "
>",:' ';"
, ,
" ''','''. .'.. ,,'
.'. ...I, ~ ~.
. '~: \
. t ';'.,; 'f, .... 1
" ..
.." >>\:
..
" ',1.,' '
';',
;...;'..: :.:~ '~, " ,:' ::'
" . ,
,'. ~ ,'., ... , .
;',,: ->;:..
':' ',,'" ".,~
,..." .:' ~
0>. ~ .." ...:;\' ''''', '
Commence at the Southeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 1, Township 29 South, Range 15 East,
Pinellas County, Florida, and go N 00017148" W, 561.56 feet, along
the North-South centerline of said Section 1 - the centerline of
Hercules Avenue and its northerly projection - the East boundary of
the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 1; thence N
89017117" W, 428.00 feet; thence N 00017148" W, 108.00 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N 00017148" W, 147.21 feet; thence S
89011122" E, 100.00 feet; thence S 00017148" E, 147.04 feet; thence
N 89017117" W, 100.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
>>'EXHIBIT A
" , .' .;: ,~' , I "
i',," .;1' .,~. ~, "
i
\
;
~
(~
~~
)'
, ,~' .
: ,'i:',,:' i
\.,. II', . I
I. .,,1' .1,
. '1' ,:,.' .\
'~I' . .: '~l :~:
ti . :: . ,. . ~ "I.~'
" I .
'1'" ;', I'"
;;".:i: );:~; :',;
~-.-.... .
',.. ..."~ II" ;,v )
:i:i:ij '.:1;: r:,:,'"
.; .' .. '. ~ . '. . ~
.t:: i~i ;,';:' ~f ;
.' I, .' ,I,
," f. .~r J:~ .
--.. .---'-"-"
1780
.5 '1 /15
31/11
!.
,: : :J,
"
3'1/101
191~
lL
'~~9-;~:1 gJ~ 1-------
o
10
}!'{ { :ii;J.
" II ~",'~:,i.
",:,; ;:, t..:...}~;;"
:;. ., '/ r ;. "; ,I
. "',:. .,'
34/10
1912
1901i
1903
34/22
34/21
34/29
B
,:,H/2'1
1908
]'1 /2:~
.. . ,', .&' , ---_.---- _._--
", " ,01 ", :,. I/JO~
; ; ':".: '. ~. 11:,
I, ,I .'
, ....~ "',
3'1/3'1
3'1/26
34/25
1771
,~
~~
'J
,
i
~.
1710
~ I() '43
N
a ~
ffi ~
:x: cJ
I
I
,.... q
~
'1'1
I
.0
N
0
..
1701
3'1/212
"
.11;:
.~.
.i\
\'
"
,l~
~~
JL
34/36
OWNEn
/l. P f1 Lie A t~ T
PROPOSED ".ANNEXATION
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT arid ZONING
.. t
I ^, 9 '3 - I G .
\ '" S T \7- U f\') e tJ r TR {\ t~ S (0 ~f.Y1EQ'{
LUP' g 3- 22-
pnOPEnTY OEscnlPTlorc
LAND US E PLAN
ZONING
M If:( B '3 tl I '3 \ \
FROM
\J tJ C L A 5 ! 'F I ~ D
C 0 u rn Y
I M'~ tv\~
0.31.. AcnES
nlGIIT OF WAY
TO
\ lJ 0 V S -r R \ A L
\L
AcnES
PLAffUIUO Ilnd ZOtflUO BOAno
i I
CITY COMMISSIOH
SE.CTIOH 0\ TOWUSltlP 2.9 S RANGE I~ E ATLAS PAGE '2. G 2 A
,..,.._...____..__.________. _..____.____.._A.. ..,_-_..______,______.___
~ I' .'. .,. .~
... .,-"
; t "
". r
..... _..,~..~-~'. .....,.., ~ ,,'"
" .
..,... '.;. f.'.'
...'-........--.-..-......... ...
, ,
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5440-93
. 0 .;"'-'.,
. , .t. '.:,. ..
, "
, .
.., t
. ' .,'
.,"
'1 ',',"
" '
, ,", '
, ,r,
..;1 " ,P C,~ ,~'~'>
-4f ~8
Revised 9-24-93
THIS ORDINANCE DOES NOT REQUIRE AMENDMENT. DO NOT PROCESS THIS MOTION.
In Section 4, delete II, and subject to approval of the land use category
set forth in Orcl i nance No. 5439-93, b) the Pine 11 as County Board of County
Commissionersll.
NOTE: On September 16, 1993, Ordinance 5296-92 re: ppe consistency andOrdihance
5312-92 re: comprehensive plan amendments were adopted; therefore, the land use
plan amendment does not have to be approved by the county.
;
,:..
,: .\", .'.'
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
(A93-16)
Zonina District
IL - Limited Industrial
I'
ORDINANCE NO. 5440-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF THE SEABOARD COAST
RAILROAD, SOUTH OF CALUMET STREET, AND WEST OF HERCULES
AVENUE, IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST,
AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, UPON ANNEXATION
INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (IL) i
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
HHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set 'forth
in th i s ord i nance is found to be reasonab 1 e, proper and appropr i ate, and in
compliance with Florida law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County,
Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of
Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is
consistent with the City1s comprehensive plan.
Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption,
contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 5438-93.
,
I
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
August 19, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to forn and correctness:
Attest:
~,
~1. A. Ga 1 rai
Ci ty Attoy'ney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
I
,:
C'ommence
Southwes t 1/4 of
Pinellas County,
the North-South
Hercules Avenue and its
the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest
89017'17" W, 428.00 feet; thence N
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N 00017'48"
89011 22" E, 100.00 feet; thence S 00017'48"
N 89017'17" W, 100.00 feet to the POINT OF
at
the
corner of
Town s hip 29
go N 00017'48"
centerline of said Section
northerly
Southeast
Section 1,
Florida, and
the
the
East,
Southeast 1/4 of
South, Range 15
561.56 feet, along
the centerline of
projection the East boundary of
1/4 of said Section 1; thence N
00017'48" W, 108.00 feet to the
W, 147.21 feet; thence S
E, 147.04 feet; thence
BEGINNING.
W,
1
,', I
;:;t!_ j ,~;\l'
,.' ,I ),1;, l'~I,.
I ~~'~Ii r~~ ~~'~ !~;~' i-
I.: ., ~'.! l .
I ,.,..
),.;!.'
, ! 1:1,: :
;:~ !:'" j.
't,,:,.' .:
':~r:: ': >1 ::~
:~I:; i: 'J. j!::'
";;: ; { :\1 L '~;
---
. Ir.! ~':'i! !I:: :~\I )
:;h:j ;jl,:t[:.,.
. . .1 ...,.
.~ ,: ~;~ :.!;. :~. :
.~: Li l:..ir I 3 1/16
.:,~(:;':~: '
- . '.
-~;z+-' -"~
~:' , ')' \< - -..---.. ---,._-- -.~"../
~. I i
) :f;: ~ >:: J'I/17
_~. ii: ---- ---.--.- !.!.~~
, I.. !....:
o
~
~
~
.1<1/15
J ,1 / 14
.3 '1 / 1fj 1
1914
1L
.. '-...,-.----\-1-'-.----------'
1909 0
34/19 ~
- _.--- -----.'-- -~,
o
10
34/16
191.2
1906
Is03
34/22
34/21
34/29
B
34/2'1
1908
3'1/2J
" ":';,:: ~',':' ;';' .~!~ ------.-..- ;904
;~ I ,I, 3'1/25
. ?"> "-- - --.--.. - --.--
~:.
'i
);
3'1 i 3'1
34/2G
,-
,
lnl
.~
,-
"
:-:-
~ Il1
34/2'2 N
a ...
JL ffi ~
:I: U
1710 I
34/36 I
"'"
~
'I')
I
10
N
0
...
, 43/1
i
I
"
,
.,
i~
','
43
..::
" ~
',>
1701
'.'
:,
OWHER
APPLlCAtlT
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT arid ZONING
^, 9 '3 - '6 ,
I
TR 1\ t~ S' (-' 0 (.U~1EI2.{
LU p' q 3- 22...
';
,\;
"
~',
,oJ
,;\
\ t-.J s'r RU rn eN\
, LAND USE PLAN
ZONING
rnOPEnTY DESCRIPTION
M l(:l B 3 l.j ( '3 \ \
FnOM
:(
.:
-'
;'J
.(:
~~
I'
\JlJCLA$.{ IF(El)
COlJUTY
M ,~, 1"V\ 1..
0.32 ACAES
nlGIIT OF WAY
TO
\N DVSTR\ r\L-
\L
ACRES
!'<;
"
,,;':
,
P L A tf tll tl G end Z 0 tll tI aDo AnD
CITY COMMISS IOH
9 E C 11 0 tl
0\
TOWtlS'tIP
19 s
RAUGE
15"' E
ATLAS PAGE
'1.62/\
.---..-- --.-- .___.........._ u_____..._ ...._ _ ...____.
a1 lo/'7h3
ORDINANCE NO. 5459-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLtARWATER, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS; AMENDING SECTIONS 27.01
THROUGH 27.13, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO PROVIDE FOR
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS BASED UPON AREA, VALUE, OR OTHER
REASONABLE BASES TO FUND PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS SPECIALLY
BENEFITTING PROPERTY; DEFINING TERMS; REVISING THE
NOTICE AND HEARING REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the construction of public works projects including but not
limited to streets, sidewalks, bridges, water and sewer facilities, drainage
facilities, and other local public improvements, and the maintenance and
rep lacement thereof, promotes and protects the pub 1 i c hea lth, safety, and we lfare
and are a valid exercise of the governmental, corporate and proprietary powers
of a municipality; and
WHEREAS, public works projects generally benefit the public at large and
specially benefit real property adjoining or adjacent to the projects or within
a definable area in which the special benefits may be determined; and
WHEREAS, the fundi ng of pub 1 ic works projects in who le or in part by
special assessments levied upon properties deriving a special benefit from the
improvements is valid if the assessment is fairly and reasonably apportioned
among the properties that receive the special benefit; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted as an exercise of the Home Rule'
authority of the City of Clearwater pursuant to Article VIII, Section 2(b), of
the Florida Constitution, and Chapter 166, Florida Statutes; now, therefore,..
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Sections 27.01 through and including 27.13, Code of Ordinances,
are amended to read:
CHAPTER 27
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL
Sec. 27.01. Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article chapter,
shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this, section, except where the
context clearly indicates a different meaning:
CODING: Underlining indicates new text;
deletions are indicated by ttrblck t~g4 type.
~
1
, "
, ,:j
':,' 1
, :j
, ; ::'1
,,',j
, . '"i
:,',:
':',.'\
"'I
':'
--
"Assessable areall means the area of propertv that will receive a special
benefit from a special assessment improvement.
"Assessable front footage" means the length of .:E-fre. property abutting .2.
special assessment -t-he- improvement that will receive a special .tOO benefit from
~ that improvement.
IIAssessable value" means the value of real property that will receive a
special benefit from a special assessment improvement. For the purposes of this
chapter , the va 1 ue sha 11 be determi ned bv reference to the assessed value
accordinq to the latest final assessment roll prepared by the propertv appraiser
for Pinellas County, includinq improvements but without regard to exemptions.
IIBas i s for assessment II means the assessab le area , assessable front footaae ,
or assessable value of real property derivinq a special benefit from a special
assessment improvement, as determined bv the citv commission in accordance with
the provisions of this chal>ter. When appropriate, the city commission may use
a basis other than area, front footaqe, or value in allocatina project costs
amonq properties specially benefitted bv a special assessment improvement.
"Cost per assessable unit front--f.oo-t." means the total project cost divided
by the total basis for assessment of all specially benefitted properties
assessable front footage.
"Improvement" shall mean a valuable addition made to real propertv or an
amelioration in its condition. For the purposes of this chapter, the term shall
include but not be limited to repairs and replacement.
"Sanitary sC\\'er extension" means the continu~tion of existing sewer
~~lity from J sewer main to serve a single property or multiple properties.
"Special assessment improvement" means a public works project which adds
to or extends the capability of a municipal service and which specially benefits
abutting properties adjoininq or adjacent to the project, or located within an
area in which the special benefits may be determined1 by increasing the safety,
utility-,- e-r- accessibility or aM value of the properties involved...:.., and shall
inclu~e The term includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the construction,
reconstruction, y'epair, paving, repaving, hard surfacing, re hard ~urfacing,
widening, guttering and draining of streets and sidewalks, boulevard~, and alleys
and the grading, regrading, leveling, laying, relaying, pJving, repaving, hard
~urfJcing, and rc hard surfacing of ~idewalksj the construction or reconstruction
of sanitary sewers, storm sewers and drains, including the necessary
~urtcnance~ theretoj the construction or reconstt~ction of water mains, water
laterals and other water distribution facilities, including the necessary
appurtenances theretoj ~ provisions for drainage and reclamation of wet, low
or overflowed lands; and bridqes and culverts. The term includes any improvement
of qeneral benefit to the public which the city commission determines to serve
a proper public purpose, and may include improvements conducted jointly with any
other public aqency or publiclv reQulated utility.
2
"Standard city street" means a paved thoroughfare with a minimum width of
30 feet from the back of one curb to the back of the other curb and complete with
standard curbs and storm drainage. -
"Streetll includes but is not limited to a road, hiqhway, boulevard~ alley.
street or other public thorouqhfare.
"Tota 1 project costll means the sum of a 11 expenses chargeab le to an
improvement, including all costs incurred from project inception to final
acceptance. Costs to be included are engineering field, design and overhead
costs; contractual costs; direct city labor and material construction costs; -aflG
general city administrative costs as a fixed percentage of the other total costS1.
and other necessary or incidental expenses.
"\o!J ter serv ice e)(:E-ens i on II mean s the cont-tnuat i on of exist i ng water
~bi 1 ity from a water ma-i'fl to serve a single property or multiple prsperties.
Sec. 27.02. Scope of article €napter.
The provisions of this article chapter shall apply to special assessment
improvements i*tb1 ic im~-eRlent as defined in seetion 27.01. Such public
improvements may shall be made or undertaken whenever the city commission
determi nes -i-R JccOl~dance wi th the procedure set out in th i s chapter that such
project should be undertaken and completed and the costs collected, in whole or
in part, as a special as an assessment.
Sec. 27.03. Declaration of intent; notice.'
(1) Whenever the city commission or city manaqer administration shall
decide within the terms of this ehapter that a special assessment improvement
needs to be accomplished, the commission shall by resolution declare the city1s
intention to have such work performed, desiqnating the nature of the work: the
location of the work; streets improved. ~anitarY sewers, storm sewers or water
lines extended; and sidewalks constructed or repaired, designating the streets
or sidewalks to be so improved; the location of such sanitary sewers, storm
sewers and drains; the location of such water Rlains, water laterals, and other
water distribution facilities, or the location of the drainage project; the part
or portion of the cost to be paid by special assessment; the manner in which
special assessments shall be made; when such assessments are to be paid1. and what
part, if any, shall be apportioned to be paid from other municipal funds of the
city. Such resolution shall also describe the lands on which the special
assessment is to be levied and it shall be sufficient to describe such lands as
all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon such
improvements or specially benefitted thereby. Such resolution shall also state
the estimated total amount of the project cost as defined iR section 27.01.
(2) Upon adoption of the resolution, the city clerk engineer shall
advertise for bids for construction of the project in a newspaper of general
circulation in the municipality and include in such advertisement the resolution
number and title. except in cases where the work will be performed pursuant to
an agreement wi th another pu b 1 i c 8aenc y or a pub 1 i c 1 v requ 1 ated ut i 1 i ty agency.
3
,';
. p'
, 'f,
-
Sec. 27.04. Setting assessments for special assessment projects.
(1) Determining basis for assessment a~sc~sable front footage. The publ ic
works director shall determine the total assessable front footage . area. value.
or other assessab 1 e un it for each -a++ spec i a 1 assessment improvement projects and
shall prepare a preliminary ~ assessment roll in accordance with the method of
assessment set out in the resolution of intent. Such roll shall show the lots and
1 and 5 to be a sse ssed and, after tak i ng into cons i derat ion the 1 imi tat ions
contained in subsection (2) of this section, the amount of assessment against
each lot or parcel.
(2) Determining assessable cost per lot or parcel. The estimated total
cost of the project as determined by the director of the public works department
s ha 11 be use d to deve lop a cost per as sessab 1 e un i t .f.r.ent foot as def i ned for the
total project. The assessable unit front footage of each lot or parcel shall be
multiplied by the cost per assessable unit front foot to arrive at the total
assessment for that lot or parcel~ within the followinq limits when the basis for
assessment is front footaqe 1-imit defined as follovJs:
(a) For corner lots or parcels, a 50-foot credit will be given for street
paving, street resurfacing and sidewalk improvements where the short side of the
property is adjacent to an existing improvement of the same type for which the
current property owner has already been assessed and the assessment paid.
(b) For corner lots or parcels benefitting from a sanitary sewer
extensiqn assessment project, the short property side shall be used for
determining the front footage basis.
(c) For irregular four-sided lots or parcels benefitting from a sanitary
sewer extension asseSSlnent project, the average of the two shortest sides will
be used as the basis for determining assessable front footage.
(d) Irregular lots or parcels having more or less than four sides will
be considered on a case-by-case basis for sanitary sewer extension assessment
projects. Assessable footage will be developed for these properties so that
assessments on these properties will be proportional to other properties in the
project.
(3) Credits. Project costs not assessed to ~ individual lots or parcels
because of the credits described in this section will be included in the city's
share of the prqject.
Sec. 27.05. levying special assessment.
(1) Upon completion of the preliminary assessment roll as provided in
section 27.04, the city commission shall by resolution fix a time and place at
which the owners of property to be assessed, or any other persons interested
therein, may appear before the city commission and be heard with respect to the
Qroprietv and advisability of makinq the improvements and fundina them with
special assessments. the cost of the project. such public improvement and the
amount to be assessed against each property so improved. The city clerk shall
, "
, . iJ
:'..,:.j
'?~~
,,' .' ~ ,
'.j
, /. 1
, I
,
, ; I
, . :~
'I
I
, I
"
'j
,.,1
:)
I
j
,I
i
,\
1
4
::1
-\
,j
I
provide written notice of such hearing to each of the property owners whose
property is subject to being assessed. Such notice shall be provided by mail not
1 e s s t h ant end a y sin a d van ceo f the he a r i n g. I n ad d i t ion, not ice 0 f the time and
place of such hearing shall be given by two publications approximately one a week
apart in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality; the last
publication shall appear not less than one week prior to the hearing date. The
resolution notice shall contain the date, time and place of the hearing, describe
the area to be improved~ and advise persons interested that the description of
i nd i vi dua 1 propert i es the prGpcrty to be assessed and the amount of the
assessment can be ascertained at the office of the city engineer.
(2) At such meeting, the city commission shall consider all objections
relating to the assessments and shall make a final decision on whether to levy
the special assessments. Thereafter. if the decision is to levy the special
assessments, the city commission shall equalize or adjust such assessments where
justice and right so dictate~ and shall approve and confirm such assessment roll
by resolution. When so equalized and approved, a final assessment roll shall be
filed in the office of the city clerk of the city, and such assessments shall
stand confirmed and remain leqal , valid and bindinq first liens upon the property
aqainst which such assessments are made until paid.
(3) A statement of the confirmed assessment shall be provided to each
property owner listed on the Donfirmed asscssmcnt roll. The property owner shall
have 30 days or such other time as may be provided in the resolution adoptinq the
confirmed final assessment roll within which to pay the total assessment.
1!l Upon completion of the improvement, the city commission shall credit
to each of the assessments the difference in the assessment as oriqinallY made,
approved, and confirmed, and the proportionate part of the actual cost of the
improvement to be paid by special assessments as finally determined upon
completion of the improvement; provided, however, that the final assessments
shall not exceed the amount oriqinallv assessed.
I
,
, I
Sec. 27.06. Certificate of indebtedness.
(1) Issued for failure to pay assessment. Where assessments are not paid
within the time provided, a certificate of indebtedness shall be issued for each
assessed lot or parcel. The certificate shall contain a description of the lot
or parcel, the amount of the assessment, a description of the improvement~ and
shall identify the confirming resolution under which the assessment was made.
Such certificate shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County 4fl&
county clerl(ls office and shall constitute a lien coequal with the lien of all
state, county, district and other municipal taxes, superior in dignity to all
other liens, titles and claims, until paid, and shall bear interest at a rate to
be set forth in the confirminq resolution, such rate not to exceed the maximum
permitted by section 170.09, Florida Statutes. ten perccnt per annum from the
date of completion and acceptance of such improvement.
(2) Installment payments. The certificate, subject to the interest
provided in this section, may be satisfied through weekly, monthly or annual
installments with such installment payment period to run not more than ten years
from the date of issuance. Such certificate, together with interest, may be paid
5
..
in full at any time and the property owner shall not incur any penalty for
prepayment.
(3) E nf orcement of payment. Upon fail ure of the property owner to pay any
installment due, any part thereof, or any interest, then the city commission may
sha 11 cause the necessary proceed i ngs by a bill in equ ity to be brought to
enforce payment of such certificate, together with all accrued interest. As a
part of such proceeding, the city shall be entitled to recover all costs and a
reasonable attorney's fee. Default in the payment of any installment of the
assessment or accrued interest shall result in the entire assessment plus
interest becoming in~ediately due. Such foreclosure proceeding shall be
in st i tuted and prosecuted under F,--S-. cll. 173 I F lor ida Statutes.
(4) Validity. In no event shall the amount or validity of the lien or
certificate of indebtedness as provided for by this chapter be questioned in any
direct or collateral proceeding instituted more than six months after the
issuance of such certificate of indebtedness by the city.
Sec. 27.07. Issuance of bonds.
The city commission may at any time without an election being held therefor
borrow money and issue bonds therefor in anticipation of the collection of unpaid
special assessments levied or to be levied for the purpose of paying the cost of
special assessment improvements constructing or repairing sidewalks, curbing,
gutters, dr~ins or thc paving of streets, and construction of sewcrs which are
to be or have been construeted by the city.
"!
Sec. 27.08. Concurrency of improvements.
Before paving or otherwise surfacing or resurfacing any street or alley of
the city, the city manager shall determine the time within which sewer, water,
gas or other underQround utility connection shall be constructed, and shall give
notice thereof to the person required to make the connection. If any person fails
to make connection when so required, no permission to make such connection shall
thereafter be granted after the completion of any street improvement for a period
of five years, unless for special reasons approved by the director of public
works. During that period of time, no permits to open or cut the street or alley
shall be issued without such special approval. Required connections during this
period shall be accomplished so as to leave the street improvement unaffected,
using such construction methods as jack and bore. Connections made shall be
subject to the general provisions of this chapter if they otherwise meet the
definitions and intent of the policy on special assessment improvements.
Sec. 27.09. Street improvements.
(1) Power to improve streets. The city sha 11 have the power to construct,
reconstruct, pave, repair, resurface, widen, provide drainage and gutters and
otherwise upgrade all paved and unpaved streets and alleys within its corporate
boundaries. Properties benefitting from any such ~ improvement shall be
assessed by the city com~ission for the total cost of such improvement of such
city streets and a lleys to standard or for any port ion of the cost of such
improvement, as determined by the city commission.
!
"
":
,I
:\
,I
6
I
, '.,)
..I
, "l
,-:,
')
1
I
1
_ I
'I
(2) Conditions for improving streets; street paving. All unpaved or
substandard streets that are paved or rebuilt or otherwise improved as providea
in subsection (1) of this section must be con~tructed to city standards and
specifications to include curbs and drainage. The cost of paving unpaved streets
will be assessed to and shared between abutting property owners. If an existing
paved street does not have curbs and drainage, the cost of bringing that street
up to standard will be equitably €qually shared between the city and abutting
property owners on either side of the street, as determined by the city
commission. If an existing paved street requires widening, whether it has curbs
and drainage or not, the cost of standardizing the street +t will be shared
equitably equally between the city and abutting property owners, as determined
by the city commission. Where a short cul-de-sac or where tfle existing right-of-
way is too narrow for street widening purposes, the city manager is authorized
to waive the assessment.
(3) Conditions for improving streets; maintenance. Existing paved ~
streets, whether standard or substandard, which have curbs and drainage shall be .
maintained at the city's expense.
Sec. 27.10. Sidewalk improvements.
(1) Power to install and improve sidewalks. The city shall have the power
to install, repair, modify and otherwise upgrade sidewalks within rights-of-way
owned by the city within its corporate boundaries. Properties benefitting from
the sidewalk improvements shall be assessed by the city commission for the total
cost of the improvement.
(2) Conditions for installing or improving sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be
constructed or improved whenever:
(a) The city commission shall decide that it is necessary in the best
interests of the city that sidewalks be constructed or repaired upon any of the
streets, avenues or alleys of the city; or
(b) Reques ted by at 1 eas t 50 percent of the property owners in a
geographic area.
(3) Exception to improvement procedure. Where an existing sidewalk is
broken, raised or othen"i se damaged by means other than as a resu lt of a
construction project, then the abutting property shall be assessed only the cost
of materials to repair the sidewalk. The city shall supply the labor to effect
such repair. The cost of repairs for damaQe caused bv construction projects
shall be charqed to the person caus;nQ such damaQe.
Sec. 27.11. Storm system improvements.
(1) Power to install and improve storm drainage. The city shall have the
power to install, repair, modify or otherwise upgrade all storm drainage systems
within its corporate boundaries. Properties benefitting primarily from such storm
system improvements shall be assessed by the city commission for the total cost
of the improvements.
, :
..;
. ~.
7
J
(2) Conditions for installing or improving storm drainage. Storm drainage
systems may be installed or improved whenever: ~
(a) The city commission shall decide unilaterally for reasons of public
health, safety and welfare that it is in the best interests of the city that
storm drainage systems be installed or improved at any location within the city;
(b) The city receives a petition signed by the property owners to be
affected by such storm drainage improvements.
Sec. 27.12. Sanitary sewer extension.
':','1
;',j
: ';'1
',,':{
".:,:]
, 1
;'::1
;;~l
: ::~
, :,i)1
(1) Power to extend service. The city shall have the power to install,
improve and maintain sanitary sewer lines and facilities, storm sewers and drains
within the corporate limits of the city, and without the corporate limits where
provided by general law or special act. Benefitting properties shall be assessed
by the city commission for the cost of the project to extend the service to their
property from the nearest main or sanitary sewer connection.
(2) Conditions for extending service. Sanitary sewer service shall be
extended when:
(a) Property owners in contiguous unincorporated areas agree, in writing,
to annex their property into the city;
(b) The city receives a petition requesting sanitary sewer service signed
by at least 50 percent of the property owners within a given unincorporated
geographic area, and when property owners in such areas agree to annex into the
city;
(c) The state department of health and rehabilitative services division
of health shall officially notify the city that a health hazard exists within a
given unincorporated or incorporated area; such health hazard shall be determined
by a field survey with appropriate tests or inspections by the state department
of health and rehabilitative services divisian of health;
(d) A property owner requests such extension of available sanitary sewer
service to property within the city or in a contiguous unincorporated area
agreeing to annex into the city and such extension is determined to be in the
best interest of the city by the city administration; or
(e) The city decides unilaterally for reasons of public health, safety
and welfare that certain properties within the city must be put on sewer service.
Sec. 27.13. Water line extensions.
, (1) Power to extend water service. The city shall have the power to
install, improve and maintain water lines and facilities within the corporate
limits of the city, and without the corporate limits where provided by general
law or special act. Benefitting properties shall be assessed by the city
commission for the cost of the project to extend the service to their property
from the nearest water main.
8
, ,!
'\
-I
1
I
I,.
. .
. '.,'
~ t
, .
. .
(2) Conditions for extending service. Water service shall be extended
when:
.
(a) Property owners in contiguous unincorporated areas agree, in writing,
to annex their property into the city;
(b) The city receives a petition requesting water service signed by at
least 50 percent of the property owners within a given unincorporated geographic
area, and when property owners in such areas agree to annex into the city;
(c) The state department of health and rehabilitative services division
of health shall officially notify the city that a health hazard exists within a
given unincorporated area; such health hazard shall be determined by a field
survey with appropriate tests or inspections by the state department of health
and rehabilitative services division of health;
(d) A property owner requests such extension of available water service
to property within the city or in a contiguous unincorporated area agreeing to
annex into the city and such ext.ension is determined to be in the best interest
of the city by the city administration; or
(e) The city decides unilaterally for reasons of public health, safety
and welfare that certain properties within the city must be put on water service.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING
AND ADOPTED
September 16, 1993
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
9
'j'
;...
..i
::
... t
~~
. ~
J
.,. )
.~~
30 /6hk3
ORDINANCE NO. 5477-93
AN OHDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF CLEAH~/ATER, FLORIDA,
A~1ENO I NG TIlE ZON I NG ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZON I NG
CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT TilE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
NORTII GAIWEN AVENUE AND ELDRIDGE STREET, CONSISTING OF
LOTS 25 AND 26, G. L. BID~JELL'S OAKWOOD ADDITION TO
ClE^'H~ATER, HIIOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESSES ARE 608 AND 610
NORTH GAIWEN AVENUE, AS DESCR I BED MORE PART ICULARL Y
/lFREIN, FRm~ MUL.TIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 8 DISTRICT (RM-
B) 10 GENERAL Cm1MEHCIAL (CG)i PI~OVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
/lAI/:.
HIII-.IU:AS, L/w illllclHJIIlCllt to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this
onl i lldllce is f Olllld La be rea sana!> 1 e, proper and a ppropr i a te, and in cornp 1 i ance
wi tll F I or~ i cia 1 i1\'I'; 11m"" there fore,
B[ 1 T OnDA I NED BY TilE CITY COMM I 5S ION OF TilE CITY OF
CI EAIHJATER, FLORIDA:
~ec.LiQ!Ll. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is
hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
1: r012gr.L.Y.
Zoning District
From: Multiple-Family Residential 8
(RM-B)
Lots 25 and 26, G. L. Bidwell's
Oakwood Addition to Clearwater,
accot~d'ing to the lIIap or plat thereof
as rcconlcd in Plitl Book 1, Paue 46,
of the public records of Pinellas
COllnty, Flol'idd. (l93-07)
~gf...Li OiL?. rtw City COIIII\I is sian doe s hereby cert ify that th is ord i nance is
consistent wilh tile City's Comprehensive Plan.
To: General COlllmercial (CG)
Seciimu. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the
ZOIl i no aLl a S 0 f l. he City ill aCCOrddrlCe wit h t he forego i ng amendment.
Sgtlion 4. Hl'is ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
September 16, 1993
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READI NG AND ADOPTED .
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to fOr'll! and carTee tnes s:
~:(]
~1. A. Ga~t
City Att.orney
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
.1
.,
i
;'\
I
I
'I
I
"i' ~/
"--
-..:----
1.1 () -,,_, . '
-,<f}', " {i ..:~ ~
\~."'" ' .
o'~ t" .
"\). ":.! () .
,\ / /1l1
\
l~I" "i 1 ~ '
..) ~ ~
.'_____":l , : \
'i -----__ ' ~?
-.'"'-......
~ ~ . -.. ..
c, .' '.
'loj '. '
, ",
. ~
42/111
) S/ Ii
-......~ - ...~- -"'--,-
. "1.'/IU
i .
\ ".
I I
, .
" : .
~'" { \ ,\ :!./O ~ . ~",
f ,0 l! '
I. \ I,' Z" ~" . ~ .., Ill' <.,
')" ~ ~ ~1 ~ g ~) 711U ~'
~' - ~~~ 'I' -'~~l~'l~l~ 'l'~I~ 'I ~'l;r \I
____, nIL _ _ . _ ,_ _ __
~" 2' ';, 0/>11
Ii' . J 'RM-;~'~' ~~! , ,
j1 H. 16:;~~.1
1,1
~
i}
,I
. - ... .~. ... - ... .-
" I
,
\ '
()
1
B 6/i!
\
" 7 jtu
t.i 5
bOil
,~tl5 SOd
J '~()I I '.
,';II" SCq ~
~ 1 14.
" t .'. ~!
6f$ :': ) 9 "
. t, . .
I .
',5Q9 110
- F.-=C' -
607 in I 7
-:;-M'~
Gi ~~~-~
o 60S
~ '=.---j 5:
I 60/ ~ 14
i :~~~ '
.'
,- II^HHIN<;TONj/l
I I f) .,. ?? 6/0
___,_J7 .,'_____~~__~Q~ _ \
I . I I I ~ ,'I I .
~~~~~NIGIH LSON
:" ,. i; ~ '. .. \ ,. .
607 ; '12, & B"I.' , '6/0
6(j~ ~;...- sic)" N i~-:~
.. J L. \,
~~I'-;~7" -....-. ~>~i; t 6606-
".'.:. '. 1.' <)[] ~ ','160R
:.: ~~^H'l'S f:~ ~~?: .
601 '.; .2, ~ -lJl,l '. 60
109 " :. , LD . ..,1_' ~'\. ,
;~;;',~-; 3---- ~'l .'/'V~;o~
. " ~.'~ ., . ~ f":'" , ,.
. >..' . '.
, " I ~ . :
J1^HHOH llI.tJli'}t'~)
W ^ '1' It; H li'HO N'I'o':;:::/',
CO N DO ',',;; I" .
:~ 1 -- : 11 .
r_ ,: r. ',1'lll,
I
I I .'.~=~.'~~=-~:~~<~~^-_~ ,~~-~.~~~;~~~~_ .~~ . 2.
1~~lOI:lOSED REZONING
OWUfR
1.PPllCAtl'T
C 1- E f\ R \.d 1\ \ L L.!. HE' (;, I' i3 0 Q. \-loo D
H 0 U 5l !~~_. '.:) E ~ v \ C, E s' .L_~!.::: c. ____
'J 604
....t
()') 4"' 6l> I
-I~;::-
_.~--
. ,
.." 6 -108
~~
":"'_1_
z Q3-o7
ZONING
pnOPEnTY DESCRIPTIO"
LOIS 25 ~ "LCD,
B \. 0 LV e L~':) o A.. K.W 00 0 I~ PO
FIlOM
R Iv\
f~
TO
c ( :1'
0.'31.. ~CnE8
.- ~-;.'-~';~';~~~-(;~'~-r~,~~__~'~j~'i ;~',;~'.'!~'~!~-~~~~.-' -~~~~~~==~=.~~~~-'~T:.~~_~~~.t: 0 M MIS S 10.4
~ .:. ~~ T'j ~;'t~ --' _ _ 9 _~l_..._.. 1 () ~.!.l..~ ~l,~~ '. --~ ~_.~ ..._._.~~.~"~~.~:..__ "~~_.=--____~ T L A ~ Of!
...._. ...... ......__..0.___ _ ~
~77 8
'" 'I I, ,I /." \ II I
.
n
() I , " , , \ F r' ~
\ I '. \ I ^ (' ('\ l ,',..
OIUllNANCE NO. 5479-93
3'
lo/rr/r3
AN ORDINANCE OF 1'1 IE CITY OF CLBARW ATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING TilE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1993; TO REFLECT INCREASES AND
DECREASES IN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE GENERAL
FUND. SI)ECrAL DEVELOPMENT FUND, SPECIAL PROGRAM FUND,
UTILITY FUNDS. BRIDGE FUND, MARINA FUND, PARKING FUND,
PIER 60 FUND, ATRIUM BUILDING FUND, ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES FUND, GENERAL SERVICES FUND, GARAGE FUND, AND
INSURANCE FUND, AS PROVIDED HEREIN; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATil
WHEREAS, the hudget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, for operating purposes,
incluuing lh:hl service. wus uuoptcd by Ordinance No. 5281-92; and
WHEREAS, ut the Thiru Quarter Review it was found that an increase in expenditures of$300,664
is ne<:essary in Ihe General Fund; II dccr~se of $1,582,939 is necessary in the Special Development Fund; an
incr~se of $4 J 6,389 is necessary in the Speciul Program Fund; a decrease of $94,760 is necessary in the Utility
Funds; an increase of $20,657 is necessary in the Marina Fund, a decrease of $90,000 is necessary in the Parking
Fund, a decrease of $29 ,()(){) is necessary in the Administrative Services Fund; a decrease of $38,250 is necessary
in the General Services Fund; a decrcnse of $24,000 is necessary in the Garage Fund; a decrease of $32,000 is
necessary ill the Insurance Fund; and thut sufficient revenues are availahle to cover these additional expenses; . and
WHEREAS, a summllry o,f Ihe 1I1llcnded revenues and expenditures is attached hereto and marked
Exhibit A; nlld
WHEREAS, St:Ction 2.519 of the CI~rwuter Coue authorizes the City Commission to provide for
the expcl1lJilure of money for proper purposes not containetJ in the hudget as originally adopted due to unforeseen .J
dn':UlllstmH:es or cmergcndes urising during the fiscHI year;
Section l. Section I of Ordinance No. 5281-92 is amended to read:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TilE CITY COMMISSION OF
TIlE CITY or CLEARWATER, FLORIDA;
Pursuant 10 the Amended City Manager's Annual R.eport and Estimate for the
fisclII yeur beginning October I, 1992, and ending September 30, 1993, a copy
of whkh is on tile with the City Clerk, the City Commission hereby auopts !ill
amended hudget fur the operation of the City, a copy of which is attached hereto
us Exhihit A.
Sl\clion 1. This onJinnllcc shall tuke effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
September 16, 1993
(
I)ASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING
Rill\ Gllrvey, Mlly()r-Colllmis!liun~r
i
I
!
" '!
AII~lit:
Approved as to form and c erectness:
..
.'
. '
-.
Cyn!hill E. Gouc.l~uu, City Clerk
~~
M. A. Galbraith, It.. C. Y ttomey
"
i.
,i
.':',' r
,- .. .
,....-<".....-.,.
EX/lIBIT A 9-10-93
1992-93 BUDGET REVENUE
first Third
Quarter Hid Year Quarter
Original An\ended Amended Amended
Budget Budget Budget Budget
1992/93 1992/93 1992/93 199Z193 Difference
General Fund:
Property raxes 18,992,340 18,992,340 19,092.340 18,992,600 -99,740
Franchise Fees 5,147,520 5,147,520 4,942,680 4,971,000 28,320
Ut i l i ty Taxes 10,090,080 10,090,080 10,353,550 10,543,550 190,000
licenses & Permits 2,007,000 2,007,000 1,958,700 2,008,700 50,000
Fines, Forfeitures or
Penalties 1,450,100 1,450,100 1,450,100 1,450,100
Intergovernmental Revenue 10,395,160 10,395,160 10,306,700 10,338,800 32,100
Charges for Services 949,940 949,940 955,260 950,250 -5,010
Us e and Sill e 0 f C i t y P rope r t y
and Honey 1,113,750 1,113,750 1,266,590 1,266,590
Miscellaneous Revenues 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000
Interfuod AdninistrBtion
Service Charge 2,703,620 2,703,820 2,709,850 2,709, 850
Interfund Other Service Charge 1,919,610 1,919,810 1,933,790 1 ,959,710 25,920
Interfund Tranllfer 2,752,910 2,752,910 2,752,910 2,752,910
Transfer tram Surpluli 2,941,330 3,534,365 3,446,102 3,525,176 79,074
Total, General fund
60,593,760 61,186,795 61,298,572 61,599,236
Special Revenue Funds:
Sped al Development
Sped al ProgrnmFund
, 11,727,680
901,000
15,207,712
1,252,005
15.687,712
1.786,079
14,104,773
2,202,.468
Ut fl itV Fund 60.223,655 60,223,655 61,706,810 61,706,810
Bridge fund 1,630,100 1,630,100 1.730,100 1,730,100
Hari no fund 1 ,591 ,640 1 ,661 , 135 1.749,935 1,770,592
Parking fund 2,750,850 2,750,850 2.720,850 2,600,850
pier 60 72 , 880 127,072 172,120 191,982
AtriulI BulldinlJ 0 0 807,270 807,270
Ad"inlstrotlv~ Scrvicc~ 4,161,740 4,168,682 4,138,130 4,138,130
GCllerul Scrvice~ 2,~04,O:SO 2,610,860 2,718,430 2,711,930
Garage Fund 7.092,910 7,098,136 7,221,496 7,221,496
I nSUI'ance 6,655,150 6,655,150 6,973,300 6.973,300
Toto l, All. funds
160,005,395 164,572,152 168,710,804 167,758,937
300, 664
20,657
-120,000
19, 862
-6,500
-.951,867
.;,;'\
.. ,,'j
':1
"', ,".!
-':'1
I
,/
I
i
,.
'.
1
"
EX/IIBIT A (Contintled)
1992-93 Bl~get Expcnditures
First Third
Original Amended AlOOnded Amended
Budget Budget Budgct Budget
1992/93 1992/93 1992/93 1992/93 DI fference
General Fund:
City COlllni:is ion 135,110 135,110 135,110 175,110 40,000
Adninistrat ion 1,358,930 1,358,930 1,338,360 1,326,060 -12,300
Public Inforn~tion Office 163,870 163,870 175,790 176,490 700
Economi c Deve' oplllcnt/CRA 104,530 104,530 104,530 104,530
legal 667,310 687,310 852,370 852,370
City Clerk 524,220 524,220 531,600 531,600
Hanagement OM Uuugct 372,910 372,910 335,550 343,050 7,500
finance 1,503,010 1,503,010 1,512,175 1,524,759 12,584
Itunan Resources 823,960 823,960 815,360 815,360
Non-Departn~ntul 5,561,140 6,154,175 6,283,304 6,811,584 528,280
Emergency Hanogclllent 7,200 7,200 54,740 54,740
Police 18,768,990 18,768,990 18,808,490 18,738,190 -70,300
fire 9,506,750 9,506,750 9,360,380 9,320,980 -39,400
Public \Jorks - Eng i neeri ng 2,158,300 2,158,300 2,158,300 2,158,300
PlJbl i c \JorKs . Airpark 64,380 64,380 63,150 57, 750 -5,400
Publ ic \Jorks - Envi,'onmcnlul 224,230 224,230 221,610 221,610
Public \Jorks . T"unspol'tat ion 2,450,870 2,450,870 2,363,170 2,328,170 -35,000
Publ i c \Jorks - Inf,'ustructu,'c 1,452,620 1,452,620 1,449,757 1,429,757 -20,000
Harine - Sailing Center 75 , 040 75,040 75 , 040 75, 040
Planning and Development 2,420,150 2,420,150 2,420,150 2,389,150 - 31 , 000
Parks and Recreation 9, 101 , 800 9,101,800 9,111,196 9,061,196 -50,000
library 3,128,440 3,128,440 3,128,440 3,103,~40 -25,000
Total, General fund 60,593,760 61,186,795 61,298,572 61,599,236 300,664
OltDINANCE NO, 5480-93
S~/q3
AN ORDINANCE OF TilE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA,
AMENDING TilE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT AND
,BUDGET FOR TilE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 3D, 1993, TO
REFLECT AN INCREASE IN BUDGET EXPENDITURES TO EXPAND
TIlE SCdPE OF PROJECTS IN THE FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES OF
POUCH PROTECTION, PARKING, PARK DEVELOPMENT, MARINE
FACIl.ITlES, GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS MISCELLANEOUS,
STORMWATER UTIL.1TY, AND SOLID WASTE; AND TO REFLECT A
DECREASE IN BUDGET EXPENDITURES TO REDUCE THE SCOPE OF
PROJECTS IN TilE FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES OF SIDEWALKS AND
BIKE TRAILS, STORM DRAINAGE, PARKLAND ACQUISITION,
BEAUTIFICATION, CITY HALL ANNEX, AND CITY HALL, FOR A NET
DECREASE OF $659,540; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Cupital Improvement Program Report and Budget for the fiscal year ending
Septclllh~r 30, 1993, was adopted by Ordinilnce No. 5282-92; and
WHEREAS, ununticipated nceds necessitate an increase in expenditures for the following: Police
Proteclion $511,830; Purking $14,982; Park Development $55,000; Marine Facilities $364,657; General Public
Building Mis~dlancous $110,690; Stormwatcr Utility $22,345; and Solid Waste $175,240, and
WII EREAS. funds of $1.254,744 are available to finance these projects through use of General
Fund Rev~nllcs, Rdmh\lrscm~nt from F.E.~.A., Marina Fund Revenues, Water and Sewer Fund Revenues, Solid
Waste Fund Rev~nues, uud Stormwntcr Utility Fund Revenues, ami
WlIE1~EAS, Section 2.519 of the Clenrwater Code authorizes the City Commission to provide for
the expenJitur~ of IllOIlCY for proper purposes not contained in the budget as originally adopted due 10 unforeseen
circulIlst.mces or emergencies arising during the fiscal year;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
TilE CITY OF CLEARW ATER. FLORIDA;
Section i. S~ti()n 1 of Ordinance No. 5282-92 is amended to read:
Pursuant to the ThirJ Quurtcr Amended Capital ImproVement Prograrn Report
und EstinmtcJ Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1. 1992 and ending
Septemher 30, 1993. a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk. the City
COllllllissioll herehy udopts a Third Quarter Amended budget for .the capital
improvement fund for the City of Clearwater. a copy of which is attached hereto
us Exhihit A.
Sl:ctioll 2. This oJ'dil1lmcc shull take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST HEADING
September 16, 1993
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL I~EADINO
Rita Gurvcy, Mayor-CoJ1unissioner
Allest:
Approved us to form and corrcctnel:i6:
Cynthiu E. G()uLl~ml. City Clerk
~
i
. '. ~
,
. ~. l
." ~
; \J
. ,;"!
',\
",
'I
. .)
'i
i
i
~ .'
1. "
. i' '.. ~, "
,;
" .'
, I ~'"
1.,"'.'
"
"
: ....~' "," -';.. t
.
EXHIBIT A
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR fiSCAL YEAR 1992/93
9-10-93
Fi rst Qtr Hid Year Thi rd Qtr
ad 9 i no l Amended Amended Amended
II Budge t Budget Budget Budget
1992/93 1992193 1992/93 1992/93 Amendnents
.-.........- .-.-...--.. --------- -.-.------. -...------...
Police Protection 760,000 760,000 760,000 1,271,830 511,830
Fire Protection 83,680 83,680 83,680 83,680
New Street Construction 1,323,000 2,523,000 2,523,000 2,523,000
Major Street Maintenance 1,440,000 1,340,000 1,340,000 1,340,000
Sidewalks & Bike Trai Is 300,000 395,289 395,289 275,289 -120,000
Storm Drainage 34,000 -693,981 -693,981 -716,326 -22,345
Intersections n5,000 -842,489 -842,489 -842,489
Parking 150,000 150,000 150,000 164,982 14,982
Miscellaneous Public ~orks 0 -39,040 -39,040 -39,040
Parkland Acquisition 500,000 2,005,655 2,005,655 1,980,972 -24,683
Park Develo~nt 960,000 1 , 9n, 706 1,994,648 2,049,648 55,000
Beautification 0 86,969 86,969 36,969 -50,000
Marine Facilities 295,000 340,249 643,530 1,008,187 364,657
libr'ories 487,000 487,000 487,000 467,000
, ,.
Garage 1,882,400 1,403,483 1,403,483 1,403,483
Ci ty Ifall Annex 0 - 1,444 -1,444 -914,090 -912,646
Maintenance of Blli I ding:; 466.525 466,525 466,525 466,525
Cityltall 7,509.320 7,510,764 7,510,764 6,726,154 .784,610
General Public Building Mise 260.680 860,016 904,996 1 , 015 , 686 110,690
Storn~ater Util ity 2,577,920 3,344,941 3,344,941 3,367,286 22,345
\Jater System 960,000 960,000 960,000 960,000
Sewer System 3,750,000 3,750,000 3,753,700 3,753,700
.Gas System 1.405,000 1,405,000 1,705,000 .1,705,000
Solid \.Iaste 2,330,000 2,330,000 2,330,000 2,505,240 175,240
TOTAL 28,209,525 30,599,323 31,272,226 30,612,686
,"',
'. 'j',',.
c.:.," ',....
~'. ..; : ~. ~'..,.,J' ....; j ,. .
, '
~ ..' ',' .
EXHIBIT A (Continued)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM fOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
gf,tlf.RAl SOURCES:
Gcnl!ral Operating RcvcnllC
General Revenue/County EHS
Generol Fund/lJnucs.i gnalcd
Sped ol DovelopCllcnt rund
Road Mill aue
Road Millage/Prior Year
Open Space In~uct Fees
Recreat ion lund '''Vlaet Fees
Recreation facility '"poet Fees
T ranspol't al i on I mpLlc l Fees
Infrastructure Tux
Drainage 11I~llct
local Option Gos Tax
Camlluni ty Redcvcl ol~lIent Agency
Bond Interest FllllU
lease Purcha:ic
Grant Revenue
Proceeds hom la,K.t Sol e
Rcinoorsement frolll F.E.H.A.
SELF SUPPORT!~G FUNDS:
Bri dge Revenue
Bridge Revenue/Prior Year
B ri dg e R & R
Harina Operating Revenuc
Marina Revenue/Prior Year
Parking Revenue
Utility Systcm:
~~tcr & Se~er Revenue
~dter R & R
Sewer Impact
Sewer R & R
Gas Revenue
Gus R & H
Sol id \JOSle Revenue
Stonnwlltcr Uti li ly
INTERNAL SERV!~_LllHQ~~
General SCI'Vicc Fund
Garaue Fund
Adninistrotive Service funu
I nsurancc Fund
BORRO\.JING.:..
L case Purchase
lliF- SUPPORT !NG BlJNOSi.
Solid Uaste Bond
Gas Bond Issue
INTERNAL SERVICE FUHDS~
Garage lease/Purchase
TOTALS:
Original
Budget
1992/93
789,005
T3 , 680
2,941 ,330
1,278,760
1,535,000
o
o
o
o
813,000
6,176,920
34,000
1,200,000
o
227,310
o
o
o
o
o
o
100,000
95,000
o
150,000
2,480,000
605,000
1,050,000
650,000
819,000
210,000
330.000
, , 127,920
250,000
65,900
4,000
1,007,200
2,000,000
380.000
1,816,500
28,209,525
------------
----..-------
First Qtr
Amended
Budget
1992/93
1,263,140
73,680
2,941,330
1,278,760
1,535,000
20,289
1,640,298
709,638
32,491
813/000
8,01'/725
34,000
372/511
-1,300/239
227,310
-1,621
88;543
o
o
55,815
o
100,000
191,895
o
182,378
2,480,000
605,000
1,050,000
650!000
819,000
210,000
330,000
1 ,127,920
256,830
71 ,126
4,000
721
528,283
2,000,000
380,000
1,816,500
30,599,323
Hid Year
Amended
Budget
1992/93
1,306,120
73 , 680
2,941,330
1,278,760
1,535,000
20,289
1,640,298
709,638
53,433
813,000
8,203,920
34,000
372,511
-1,300,239
227,310
- 1 , 621
86,543
3,700
o
55,815
111,086
100,000
191,895
o
182,378
2,480,000
605,000
1,050,000
650,000
1,119,000
210,000
330,000
1,127,920
256,830
71 ,126
4,000
721
528,283
2,000,000
380,000
1 , 816 , 500
158,490
Third Qtr
Amended
Budget
1992/93 An~ndmcnt8
1,466,610
73 , 680
3,189,010
620,114
1,535,000
20,289
1,624,860
709,638
49,188
813 , 000
7,299,310
34,000
372,511
-1,300,239
227,310
-1,621
88,543
3,700
188,812
55,815
111,086
100,000
285,695
16,857
162,378
2,506,000
605,000
1,050,000
650,000
1,119,000
210,000
518,240
1,131,440
256,830
71 , 126
4,000
721
528,263
2,000,000
380,000
1,816,500
=====;:;==:= ============
31,272,226 30,612,686
=======c::::::=
247,680
-658,646
'15,438
-4,245
-904,610
188,812
93,800
16,857
26,000
188,240
3,520
-659,540
============
, , .'
. . ~ . . .., .. .
,': '~
>,\'
,:.,'
,',
"..'
LlJ-
1
q~
AGENDA
',iTEM
#~3A
-103/3
.......-..--.---..-......,.,.... ,
.J ,':.
. :'. ,'~,~~!J
, ,~
I'" .
" '.'
;
, . .1
; ',;~'~;.1
\o('1lf3 3 3
FROM:
Michael J. Wright, City Manager
~c~ ~C~. ~ -
William C. Baker, Director of Public Works
TO:
COPIES:
Peter J. Yauch, Asst. Director PWrrraffic Engineer
Terry Jennings, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT:
Highland Avenue Widening Project
McMullen Booth Road and Marlo Drive
DATE:
August 31 , 1993
Please refer to Peter Yauch's attached memo dated August 23rd relative to the Highland
Avenue Widening project. Our most recent conversations and observations of the Pinellas
County work program leads us to believe that their Keene Road widening project now has
. more validity than ever and one can believe that it will go forward. With that in mind, we
believe that because of the numerous right-of-way parcels involved in our Highland Avenue
project, some of which will require condemnation, that we should proceed with a redesign
of Highland Avenue incorporating a three-lane section involving a continuous left turn lane.
< !
. .)
Referring also to a Peter Yauch memo dated August 31, 1993, relative to his traffic
observations at McMullen Booth Road and Marlo Drive, it is clear that the problems there
might not be as traumatic as some have expressed. Mr. Yauch points out various
addresses to the situation and they need to be discussed. This is to request that you
allow a presentation by Mr. Yauch concerning these two items of concern to be
deliberated at the same meeting. We are prepared to do this at any time. We would hope
that you would simply schedule this as a presentation for information and not require a
formal agenda item to be entered into the normal process.
WCB:jl
. Attachments - 2
:
:1
I
:
,. ,
,'.,t.,
C I T YOii' C L E ^ It 'V ^ T E R
IlIfenlepal'hncnfnl Correspondence Sheet
1'0: \Villiarn C. Baker, Director of Public Works
FROM: Pete Yauch, City Traffic Engineer fl~
COPIES: Doug Mullis, Pinellas County Traffic Engineer
Michael Wright, City Manager
-
SUBJECT: Marlo Drive at f\.1cMullcn-l3ooth Road
DA TE:
August 31, 1993
With the opening of the Dayside Bridge, traffic Oil Mcf\.tullcn--Booth Road has increased
signilicantly. Unfortunately, the added volul11cs have ovcrloaded the two lane scction of
McMullen-Booth, to the north of Sunset Point I~oad. \Ve have received several compl('lints and
inquiries from the residents of the Country Villas South subdivision, which is accessible only
by the Marlo Drive / McMullen-Dooth Road intcrscction, about delays and accidents when
entering and leaving their subdivision. ^ recent ncwspaper article and editorial also described
the concerns of residents and suggested several options.
Jurisdiction over the intersection is shared -- Marlo Drive is in the City of Clearwater,
lvlcMulIen-Booth Road is a Pinellas County road, and Weatherstone Drive, which forms the east
leg of the intersection, is in S;l fC"ty Harhor. Both the COllnty and the City of Clearwater have
observed the intersection over the past few months, with detailed studies being conducted during
the past couple of days.
The newspaper article described delays of "up to 15 minutes" when turning left out of the
subdivision. The City Traffic Engineering Division, on Thursday and Priday of last week,
conducted delay studies for the morning, midday, and evcning pcak periods. The time of arrival
(first stop at the intersection, possibly bchind other waiting vehicles) and time of departure
(entering the traffic stream on McMullen-Booth) of each vehicle arriving on the I\1arlo Drive
approach was noted; the difference in these times shows that vehicle's delay in entering the
intersection.
A summary table for these delay studies is attached; note that during the five hours that the
intersection was monitored, the longest that a left turning vehicle leaving 1',,1arlo Drive waited
was 4 minutes 12 seconds (the second longest wait was 3 minutes 24 seconds); during the
morning, the average delay was 53 seconds. Right turning vehicles waited an average of 23
seconds during the morning peak; the longest delay during the entire five hours was 1 minute.
43 seconds. While these times can seem long to drivers waiting to enter the road, they do not
approach the 15 minute figure mentioned in the newspaper article.
, '., "I . , . . . , . , . ~ . ' . ,...... -. -, ,. - .i. .
Mr. William Baker
August 31,1993
Page Two
There is a significant difference between the numbers of right turning and left turning vehicles
leaving Marlo during peak periods. Several passerby noted to data collection staff that, because
of concerns about making left turns, many people tllrn right and then make a U-turn farther
south. With the unusual split between left and right tllrns, this is undoubtedly true.
Several options have been discussed:
Signnlize fhe intersection - National standards for signal installation warrants call for a
combination of minimum main street and mitIor strect traffic volumcs, with additional
considerations for approach speeds, pedestrian activity, and accident histories. Pinellas County
Traffic Engineering has studied the intersection and determined that the side street traffic does
not come close to satisfying these minimum volume requirements. In addition, their study shows
that there is not a significant accident history i 11 regard to right-angle accidents, which would be
the type normally corrected by signal installation.
Why not make an exception and put up the signal anyway -- to "prevent (111 (1ccidcl1t"? Contrary
to popular belief, traffic signals do not prevcnt accidents. Fort y-nine of the top fi fly accident
locations in the City of Clearwater are at signalized interscction~. Thc typical installation of a
signal may reduce right-angle accidents, but with an increase ill rear-cnd and side-swipe
accidents. Right angle accidents have not been a problem at this intersection, hut there have
been several rf-<'1r-end accidents in the vicinity already -- a functioll of the current congestion
levels. The installation of a signal would further disrupt the traffic now on f\'1clvlullcn-I3ooth
and potentially increase the rear-end accidents.
Build 11 back entrance to the subdh'isioll - ^s sllown ill the auached aerial photogrllph, the
western edge of the Country Villas subdivisioll is forllled by the City-owned right-of-\vay for
a future extension of L1.ndmark Drive. The Land mark project's priority was greatly reduced
when the Pinellas County School Board decided not to build a proposed middle school on
property that faces the Landmark right-or-way. However, plans for a three lane roadway, from
Enterprise Road south to Union Street, are complete and are now undergoing the environmental
permi tling process.
At the present time, the County is further along in the construction process for widening
McMullen-Booth than we would be if Land rnark Drive extension became a top priority. ^s the
completion of McMullen-Booth Road would resolve the congestion problem being faced by the
residents, starting on a full-blown Landmark project at this ti me would not be an appropriate
solution. In addition, the residents of the subdivision have been .divided 011 whether the
subdivision should ever be connected to Landmark, in f~1r of a potential "cut-through" route
being formed. A petition against a future connection, signed by many of the residents, was
received by our office a few months ago.
. ~ ,'. .. ~ . . " '. .'. .' .' , '. . :.. ~ I ' .' r. ." ;., .~ I .
Mr. William Baker
August 31, 1993
Page Three
A temporary road along this alignment has been s\lggc~ted, as Marlo Drive dead ends into the
Landmark corridor. Unfortunately, the Landmark right-or-way to the north of !\tInrlo, and
particularly just south of Enterprise Road, is considered jurisdictional wetlands, triggering
special environmental concerns that would delay any proposed "quick and dirty" construction
projects.
There are two alternatives to constructing a temporary road all th.e way to Enterprise Road --
both involve connections to existing street ends in the adjacent subdivision - Countrypark. The
easiest to construct route would be the extension of Marlo Drive westerly along an existing hard-
surfaced access road on undeveloped City Park property, to meet with the southern end of
Parkstream ^ venue (shown as Alignment A in the photograph). However, this alignment would
be immediately adjacent to the rear property lines of eleven houses on Hillcreek Circle South,
in the Countrypark subdivision, the residents of which have already been vocal about future park
plans. In addition, the use of lhis corridor may not be compatible with the terms of the Federal
grant used to purchase the park land over twenty years ago.
The second alternative route is shorter, but with greater environmental impacts. It would run
along the Landmark corridor to Saber Drive (^Iignment B in the aerial), and retention ponds
may have to be constructed. However, the route docs fun behi nd undeveloped lots in the
Countrypark subdivision, thus minimizing residential impacts..
In considering either route, several questions would need to be addressed. What design
standards should be used? Should street lighti ng be provided'! Would the temporary road attract
traffic as a cut-through route, as motorists try to bypa~s tbe delays at the Enterprise / lv1cMullen-
Booth signal? One solution to minimizing concerns migh t be to provide only a single lane, one-
way roadway, allowing Counlry Villas traffic to ex it to En tcrprise Road, but with all traffic
destined for the subdivision required to use the l\ldv1ullen-1300th entrance.
Dropping the Speed Limit onl\'lcl\lullcn-fl()()fh :It the J\JllrlO Ddve intersection - Speed limits
are set in accordance with State laws and procedures, to ensure their enforceability. As speed
limits are set based on free-now speeds, I don't see any provisions for reducing the limit in this
area. An artificially low speed limit, without heavy police presence, will be ignored.
Instnlling big signs with n~shing lights - The County did install DO NOT BLOCK
INTERSECTION signs northbound and southbound at Marlo Drive. From my observations,
most drivers on McMullen-Booth are aware of the Marlo Drive intersection and, when in a
stopped queue, will provide a gap for side street l1lotori~ts. However, pcrhnps from a concern
of being rear-ended by following traffic, Illost motorists tm veil ing at speed along I\.fcM ulJen-
Booth will not slow or stop to allow side street traffic to elltcr. I doubt that any signing would
be effective in changing this behavior, and may calise a false sense of security for side street
traffic.
Mr. William Baker
August 31, 1993
Page Four
I have seen non-standard actuated signs, reading TR^prIC ENTERING ROl\OWA Y WHEN
FLASHING, with detectors on the side street approaches, lIsed in other slates where sight
distance was a concern. I di~cw:sed these with the County's Traffic Engineer, who noted that
the beginning of roadway construction would alrllost immediately destroy the detectors, thus
negating the value of the signs (if any).
Adding a Left Turn Lane 011 J\1cl\Jullcn-nooth - By tapering arollnd the intersection with
added pavement, it might be possible to provide a refuge for cars exiting T\1arlo and
Weatherstone (as well as provide a left turn lane illln these streets). This soltlliol1 w~s fO\lnd to
be impractical due to the almost immediate construction work on T\tdv1ullen-I3ooth, which would
eliminate the extra width from the pavement.
Pr'ohihltiug Left TunIs Out of the Subdivision - 1 f snfety is the primary COflccrn, the potelltint
for right angle accidents involving left turning vehicles could be eliminating by prohibiting the
turn -- certainly a loss of convenience for the sllbdiyision's residents. f\1any motorists leaving
the subdivision during peak hours are already imposing this upon themselves. I do not consider
a prohibition to be the resolution to the problem.
In summary, the only real option to resolving the Country Villas access problem is the
construction of a temporary access road, most Ii kely to olle of the street ends in the Cotln trypark
subdivision. This would most likely result in significant opposition from the Cotll1trypark
residents, due to possible additional traffic, noise, dust, and lighting spillover. And, there would
be a delay in completion if environmental factors need 10 be resolved.
The immediate question is whether the problem wClrrarJl~ this type of Clctiol1. ^ vernge side street
delays are not that high -- in fact, with the cycle lengths required to move tile tv1cl'vtullcn-Booth
traffic, average side street delays at all of the signalized intersections along ~1cMlIl len-Baotlt are
longer than the average wait at Marlo. If delays sllch as these became the standard for
constructing a signal, then virtually every fast food restmlfnnt on US 19 would qualify for a
si gnal install ati on.
In addition, it should be noted that there are sever~1 other connections to Mcf\,ful1en-I3ooth (most
on the east side of the road, oulside Clearwater) with similar delays.
If there is further interest in developing a teniporary roadway, please let me know.
Attachments
~
~
o
~
~
<
~
<
o
~
=
E-c
o
o
~
I
~
~
CJ
~
~
@
~
CZJ
~
<
~
~
Q
E-c ~ ~ en en ~
"0 "'C "'0 ~
~ s: c:: C "'C c: -0
~ 0 0 c 0 c::
~ ~ ~ 0 en ~ 0
~ ~ "0 ~
~ en en c CI)
~ ~ en 0 CI)
~ ~ t- O ~ ~ -o::t
~ 'V ~ -o::t
~ CI) ~
Co:) z ~ ~ ~
0 00
z c:: c c ("t') c:: c::
~ .- .....
s ~ ~ ~ N .-, ~
11 ~
~ --' ..-4 ..-4 --'
::: ,.. ..-4
N ,.. M' - ...... N
- -
N
~ t:
~ -<
s: en CI2 en
"0 "'C "0
~ c:: c: c:::::
0 0 0
0 ~ ~ ~ U
dJ
~ ~ en CI) en
~ tr) ~
~ N - ("4
>
~ -<
~
~ t- ..-4 t-
o tr) - ("4
u
~ t= ~ CI2 en r.n en
< "0 "0 "0 "0 "0
~ c:: c: c:: c: c:
0 0 0 0 0
:: ~ ~ ~ CI) ~ ~
~ "0
~ en C/) U) c: C/) CI')
~ C'l 00 0 0 ""'" \0
~ ~ ~ .... ..-4 C'4 ~ ("4 N
Z 0;3 ~ ~ CI) ~ ~
~ \0
Z 0 c::::: c::: c::: -.::t c::: c:
0 ~ ..... .- ..... .- .-
~ ~ ~ N ~ ~
~ "gl
..... -.::t' ("4 ..-4 g' N
9 ... N ...... N' ...... M
- -
N'
E-c
.....c
~ <
~ ~ CI) en
"0 "0 "0
c:: c:: r::
~ 0 0 0
0 ~ ~ u ~
llJ
~ ~ CI) CI) CI')
~ ~ ..-4
tr) C'l tr)
~ >
~ <
~. C'l 0\ t-
o ~ ..-4
U
~ ~
~. ~ ("t') 0\
~ ~ 0\'V:j' <: ~ 0"1.-- ~ ~ - ,--.
~ r::: ~ ~ - ~ \0 rn
0 -<( ~ t- =' ~ N ~
UJ C"l . ::s ~ N 0 - ='
~ ~ 0\ _ 0 ...... oa~ ~ \0 00 0
oop::: Z I ~ CI)=r::
~ , ~t!, 0 C2c I ~N
~ ~ t- o N t:tc """ =........
Uo4 ...... ~ E5
z
....
If'
~
i
',. I ~.
'f~' .
:.. I
. ;.j
1 :. .~"(
. f' "1;-
'.."~ I
(;.'tr.:f.i.
, -
....
~
1
t'
l~
1\
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO:
William Baker, Director of Public Works
FROM:
Pete Yauch, City Traffic Engineer
PUB~IC WOR. ~EPARTMENT
(~6B
INFRA Ui/l 5T'lG m;\NS EN'!
o GS Q f:?,1l3 0 CMl-I C.l I"i t:l TM
C3 0 a CJ 0
f.:""\ !,,:.; C.' !HI. 0 ~;H 0 CfJ
COPIES:
i'-;LI:: __ .,______
- ....- --
l~ ~ ([J ~ ~ W ~ f~
~ll AUG 3__~ 1~3J!lj
elF 0; C.L~.', ....: ~ (
PL'~"" ", "\......1:. '''\IT
: __._I::~.~...:.~.....--~.. ._.. ,.
SUBJECT: Highland Avenue Traffic Analysis
DATE:
August 23, 1993
r.....~/::~~~ .~(:. ...__....-.._._...............___
At the City Commission budget session on Capital Improvement Projects, the current ,necessity
for the widening of Highland Avenue was questioned. Highland Avenue was the Department's
highest priority widening project, with plans for a four lane cross-section between Gulf-To-Bay
and Palmetto, a five lane / four lane divided cross section between Palmetto and Sunset Point,
and a four lane section between Sunset Point and Union. However, Pinel1as County has moved
the extension of Keene Road, between Gulf-To-Bay and Sunset Point Road, into its work
program for FY 95/96. Keene could conceivably handle the traffic that Highland was projected
to receive.
Highland can be divided into a number of different sections based on its existing conditions:
At Union Street: A 1988 intersection improvement funded through the Florida Department of
Transportation as an off-system project provided for long northbound and
southbound left and right turn lanes. We have received no complaints about
congestion at the intersection since the project was completed.
South of Union Street to north of Sunset Point Road: The road is two lanes wide, with
several intersections with minor residential streets. The City's latest traffic counts
show approximately 15,800 vehicles per day travel this section, which would
represent a Level of Service liD" for a suburban collector'.
At Sunset Point Road: The southbound approach provides a short taper to a short left turn lane
and a shorter right turn "notch". Northbound, a short left turn lane is provided.
The alignment of movements across the intersection is poor, particularly in the
southbound direction. An intersection analysis of existing peak hour volumes show
an intersection Level of Service of liB" for the morning and "C" for the evening.
South of Sunset Point Road to North of Greenlea Drive / Otten Street: This is a narrow
three lane section (short left turn bays down the center) with numerous commercial
driveways. Our counts show approximately 18,900 vehicles per day travel this
section, which would represent a Level of Service "F" for a suburban collector.
I Level of Service analyses for sections of roadway are based on a planning process; analyses for intersections
are based on a detailed simulation and are much more microscopic in nature. There are often discrepancies between
the two values for the same piece of roadway; we believe the intersection analyses to be the best representations
of actual field conditions.
Mr. William Baker
August 23, 1993
Page Two
At Greenlea Drive I Otten Street: The southbound left turn lane is adequate; the northbound
left turn lane is very short. This is a school crossing. Peak hour analyses show
an existing morning Level of Service of "C" but an evening Level of Service of
lip" .
South of Greenlea I Otten to North of Palmetto Street: This is a two lane section; our link
counts are the same as the adjacent northern section, showing 18,900 vehicles per
day and a Level of Service "F". This section includes a railroad crossing and poor
intersection geometries at Flagler Street.
At Palmetto Street: The northbound and southbound left turn lanes are short and the roadway
is narrow. Intersection analyses show a Level of Service of "B" during the
morning and II D II during the evening peak.
South of Palmetto Street to North of Drew Street: This is a two lane section which IS In
transition to the five lanes of the Drew Street intersection south of Jacaranda
Circle. The Drew Street PD&E study shows an average daily traffic of 16,400
vehicles per day, which represents a collector Level of Service of "DII .
At Drew Street: This intersection was improved by the State in 1987; the Drew Street PD&E
study shows that it is currently operating with a Level of Service flB" during the
morning peak and "C" during the evening peak.
South of Drew Street to North of Cleveland Street: This two block section consists of a taper
back to a two lane section. Counts from the Drew Street PD&E study show a
daily volume of 14,900, which would be a Level of Service "C".
At Cleveland Street: This intersection is constrained with inadequate comer radius, making
right turn maneuvers difficult. However, left turn bays for the northbound and
southbound approaches and relatively light traffic on the east and west approaches
result in an intersection Level of Service of "B" for both the morning and evening
peak periods.
South of Cleveland Street to North of Gulf-To-Bay: This is a two lane section which
transitions to four lanes, for the Gulf-To-Bay intersection, south of De Leon Street.
Based on the link data from the Drew Street PD&E study, the daily volume would
be approximately 14,900 and the collector Level of Service "C".
At Gulf- To-Bay: This intersection was determined during the Cleveland Street Parking Study
to be operating at a Level of Service "D".
~
When the Highland Avenue widening project was formulated, there was little action on
alternative north-south routes. The Alternate US 19 PD&E study had just been initiated
'>
Mr. William Baker
August 23, 1993
Page Three
!
.
~
(meaning construction was at least seven to ten years off) and Keene Road (County Route 1) had
been shelved for years.
Assuming a north-south traffic growth rate of 1.4 percent per year (as determined in the Drew
Street PD&E study) and no improvements to Highland, the intersection Levels of Service would
be "e" in the morning and liD" in the evening at Sunset Point; "E" and "F" at Greenlea / Otten;
"D" and "F" at Palmetto Street; and liD" and "c" at Cleveland Street. Similarly, all roadway
sections would be at Level of Service "E" or "F". Therefore, the planned widening to four or
five lane cross sections was valid and justified.
However, earlier this year Pinellas County moved the construction of Keene Road, from Gulf-
To-Bay to Sunset Point, into its Transportation Improvement Program. If we assume that this
construction will in fact take place, then we can reevaluate the need to widen Highland Avenue.
The travel pattern model referenced in the Drew Street PD&E study has assumed that Keene
Road would be built as planned; that Missouri Avenue, between Drew and Cleveland Streets,
would be widened, and extended north of Drew to Douglas Avenue (as Alternate US 19), and
that Highland would be widened to a four lane divided section. The following table compares
1992 volumes to the model's projected 2005 volumes for all major corridors to the north of
Drew Street, west of Northeast Coachman Road:
Corridor 1992 Volumes 2005 Volumes % Difference
Fort Harrison Avenue 23,080 18,390 .20.3
Garden Avenue 2,070 780 .62.3
!vI yrtle A ven ue 11 , 190 6,710 -40.0
Greenwood A venue 4,550 1,710 -62.4
Missouri A venue 0 13,740 100.0
Betty Lane 9, 140 400 -95.6
Highland A venue 16,410 20,150 22.8
Saturn Avenue 4,650 1 ,760 -62.2
Keene Road 0 20,190 100.0
Hercules A venue 24,940 15,570 -37.6
AREA TOTAL 11 96,030 99,400 3.5
Highland Avenue attracts trips in the model solely because of the planned widening. Without
the widening, the other north-south arterials (such as Myrtle and North Fort Harrison A venues
; and Betty Lane) would not have lost the trips in the model. As the model is showing a total of
only 3.5 percent increase over all the corridors, the added capacity of a new Keene Road (even
. . ...', ~", . . . ,. -"
< < 1::';<
,~~ .;.;.;' 1.
"I. .
;..~
." ...'..."'" :\'
~ ".. . ~.;
,.. :j'. <, .-~.
Mr, William Baker
August 23, 1993
Page Four
without the Missouri extension) should relieve the demands on Highland Avenue.
Therefore, it should be possible to scale back an improvement project to a three lane cross
section, with intersection improvements (including left and right turn bays) and improved corner
radiuses. This should considerably downscale the right-of-way acquisition requirements and
storm drainage retention and treatment requirements.
However, I believe an improvement project is still necessary -- that we should not just cancel
or postpone the project. Because of lane constrictions and tight turn radiuses, we are not getting
the full capacity and smooth flow that we could. The three lane section would allow left turning
vehicles to get out of the flow of traffic, reducing delays and the probability of rear end
collisions. Radius improvements would help traffic flow within the intersections. Pedestrian
and bicycle safety would also be enhanced.
If I can provide any additional information, please let me know.
:,. J
< I
I
I
i
I
Highland Avenue at Sunset Point Road
H01 Su,,"ar~ Resu 1 ts f or Cas e : H -SP- AI1
Existing AM P~ak
Sunset Polnt.MlghJand
l}en:lon z.a
X Delay 19'9
Sl t (J?
LanE! y,IB vIe (secr'
~ Gr-ou~ !!!:!l!! Rat 10 veh) LOS J l.
ED L .~ .23 11.1 B ~ 18
T1l .Z9 .76 1B.8 C -- 379
~11 17.3 C .,-- 114
WB L
-rR
All
NB L.
TIl
f.t1I
SB L
....r
R
All
Illtersect
.28
.38
.53 1'1.4 B
.78 IB.8 C -I?~ :1
17.8 C. 356- I
sa -,.
.19 &.6 B i r
.ElZ IB.B Il ,
9.6 B 46 B8
354
.'Z7 7.8 B 1
.71 11.6 B .-. .:::
=-==--
.88 6.2 B z..- "
1B.6 B
.74 13.7 B
.16
.33
.1-1
.38
.64
.6.8
HCrl Su,*uy Re~:ul u for Case: H-Sp-pn Sunset PolntAllghland
Ex b: t. i 09 PH Peak lJers: Ion :l.B
X D~ lal:l ""Be
26 ~ sa
Lane VIS vIe (see,.. J ~
~ Gl"OU~ Ratio Rat 10 veh) LOS
ES L . .12 .31 11.1' B 'L- 77
40TH .35 .91 28.3 D 32-1
All Z&.2 D ..- B3
US L .Z8 .51 11."'1 B
I'll .20 .7'" 17.-4 C ?e--'"
All 15. '9 C "'l13--
8"'-"
~B L .15 .28 ?1 D '1 r
*TR .58 .9'1 Z&.7 D t
All 24.2 C 92 187
551
sa L .17 .3Z ?"'i B 1
. .:::
T .38 .57 9.2 D - -.
~ -
R .82 .84 6.e B 24 04
All B.a B
Intersect ,85 .93 19.~ C
Highland Avenue at Greenlea Drive / Otten Street
HCI1 SunMa.ry Results for Case: H-G-AM Ot."ten /'Highland
Ex Ls:Ung AM Pea.k Uer~lon z.a
X Delay 669
j J 1E
Lane VIS Y/e (sec I
~ Croup Rat.io Rat. i 0 veh) LOS
EB LTR .18 .25 11.2 B 'L- 24
All 11.2 B - 74
.- 177
WB *LTR .25 .&i 15.4 C
All 15.4 C 43 ~
74 --.
14 ---.
HB L .B1 .132 a.e B 1 r
TH .-i3 .B1 15.1 C t
All 15.8 Il 4 74
493
SB L .83 .85 (; .1 n 1
. .:: :
~rH .53 1.00 37 .1 D - --
~
All 36.6 D 24 04
(ntar-sact .78 .as 23.9 C
',I
H01 SuJ\Mary Resu Its for Case: H-G-PM Ot.ten /HIghland I
Exhting Pt1 Pea.k Ven. Ion 2.8
X Deb.y S7B
J4J ~
Lane V.lS Y,IC ($OCI
flee Group Ratio Ratio veh) LOS
IB LIR .12 .41 15.8 C 'L- 29
All 15.8 C - 53
.- 133
\JB -r.m .20 .71 21.9 C
All 21.9 C ..8 -:f
116-
5~
NO L .92 .83 3.8 A , t r
*TR .75 1.28 119.5 F
All 118.3 F 18 177
813
SB L .22 .35 5.6 B 1
TR .4& .74 9.1 B . -- .:: :
=-==- .
All B.9 B 17 04
Intarsect .96 1.85 &4.5 F
. . ^
, .: ':-
Highland Avenue at Palmetto Street
Hen SuNtary Resu Its for Case: U-P-AM Pall'etto
Ex h:ting At1 Peak - 4.1'41'91 Tt1C
AUghland
I.Jen:lon 2.13
X Delat)
Lane VIS ....1'0 (secl
~ Group Ratio Rat I 0 veh) LOS
EB L .00 .13 16.6 C
TH .as .38 17.5 C
All 17.3 C
UB *[.TR .99 .33 17.8 C
All 17.8 C 39-3'
S9 ---
504 ~
725
&4 J 13
J ~
'=--
41
51
28
I
! :
-
.-
HB L .18
Tn .29
All
SB [. .BZ
...rn .66
All
.15 ".2 A I r
.45 5.5 B t
504 B 38 '"
387
.83 3.8 A 1 2 :!:
. ,. , - -,
.92 19.1 C ::: ' ~ 58 :ff' 04
.
18.9 C 28 .. 1
.74 H.8 B
Intersect .69
HCI1 SulN4ary Results For Case: H-P-PN Pal~ti.o /HIghland
Ex l1;U ng Pt1 Peak - 11/12,.67 tHe Ven; ion 2.8
X Delay 515
34 ! 28
Lane VIS vIe (see" J t.
8.E.e Grou~ Rd.io Ratio veh) LOS
EB I. .13 .49 19.9 C ~ 93
TR .13 .49 19.1 C - 171
All 19.-4 C ....- 19
~B ...LTH .22 .82 29.6 D
All 29.6 D 93--"
126-
68 -,.
HB [. .19 .38 1.8 A 1 r
*TR .69 1.86 5B.5 E t
All 45.9 E 183 7
995
SD L .15 .23 4.5 A 1 2 J!L.
.-- --.
Tn .42 .~ 7.4 B ==- --=-=-= 58 if:'..
.
All 7.3 B ze " 1
Intersect .91 .99 39.8 D
Highland Avenue at Cleveland Street
HCI1 SuJ'\Mary Results for Case: H-C-A11 ClevelollOO
Ex1~ting AM Peak
AHghland
Version 2.13
X Delay
Lane ViS y/o (sec/
fl2P. Group Ratio Ra"tto veh) ~
EB LTR .B9 .22 7.1 B
All 7.1 B
-194
j11
't..-
44
4<17
S1
-
r-
...-
\/B *LTFI
All
.ZZ
.52 8.S B
8.S B
22~
289-
7--:t-
HB L
TR
All
.62
.31
.EH: 5.7 B
.&7 9.'3 B
9.f1 B
.Z~ 6.3 B
.95 26.5 D
24.2 C.
.75 l4.e B
I t r
9 3e
376
.
:::r
19
- 2 J!L
.:: :
04 1 2:1 :fr' 04
SB L
....rH
All
.11
.44
1.
Int.arsect .66
Ha1 SuJ'\Mar~ Results for Ca~e: H-C-PM C le~ I.aY\od Mlghla.'Ild
Ex 1st.! ng PM Pea.)( Ve..slon Z.B
X DeJl...y "'::JEI
32 J 66
Lane v/:s Vie (see I J ~
~ Group R~tiD Ratio ~ LOS "t-
IB *L1il .27 .~4 9.8 II 116
- zaG
All 9.a B
.-- sa
-
---------- ----------
-
WB L!H .23 .54: 8.7 1) ---------- ----------
All B.7 II B7...J I
I.
446 --- I
HB L .83 .86 5.7 B 6~
....TH .41 .98 ZB.a c 1 , r
All 19.6 C 15 36
513
SB L .14 .39 G.7 E 1 2 J!l.
--- .- .
TR .35 .71 12.3 II ~ ~ Zl lif' 4
.
All 11.6 E 19 " 1
Intersect .68 .7B 12.6 B
.4
.,'
.'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdcpartrncnt:1J Correspondence Shl'Ct
TO:
Ivtichael Wright, City ~lanager 33 ;""\.
fl-e -:... '- '-".....
Pete Yauch, City Traffic Engineer I?J~
COPIES: William Baker, Director of Public \Vorks
Re4m Wilson, Director of Parks and Recreation
FROl\I:
SUBJECT: McMullen-Booth Road at Marlo Blvd. -- Traffic Conditions
DATE:
October 7, 1993
This memo is to update you on the situation at Marlo Blvd. and McMullen-Booth Road. This
will be discussed at tonight's City Commission meeting. A number of safety features have been
implemented or are in the works:
o
Large warning signs, reading "WATCH FOR SIDE STREET TRAFFIC I NEXT
21,4 MILES" have been instaJled by the County at each end of the two lane section
of McMullen-Booth Road. Construction flashing lights will be added to the signs
by the contractor when construction work begins.
o
Intersection warning signs for the major side streets along McMullen-Booth were
installed by the County this week. These signs have an advisory speed plate
reading "25 MPHtf. These signs will be topped by orange flags, to be installed by
the City by early next week.
o
The construction speed limit (once construction activities begin) will be set at 35
mph, down from the e:dsting speed limit of 45 mph. The feasibility of reducing
the speed limit even more, to 30 miles per hour, is being evaluated by the County.
o
An additional street light will be placed at the intersection of Marlo Blvd. and
McMullen-Booth; an elementary school bus stops at the Marlo Blvd. intersection
during the early morning hours and the lighting will help improve the safety of the
stop.
o
I have requested additional police enforcement in the area, cltmg the citizens'
concerns about speeding, blocking the intersection and passing stopped school.
buses.
I have researched further the feasibility of developing a temporary roadway which would connect
Marlo Blvd. with Parkstream Avenue in the adjacent Countrypark subdivision. This route would
following an existing service road along the northern boundary of the City's undeveloped Lake
Chautauqua Park.
Michael \Vright, City rvfanagcr
October 7, 1993
Page Two
The land for ChaUL'luqua Park was purchased in 1972 with a matching grant from the Fcderal
Land and Water Conservation Fund program. The original scope of the project was to
" .. .develop a multi-purpose recrc..'ltion area that will provide overnight camping, picnicking,
water-oriented activitics and nature trails. If
In 1986, Florida's Department of Natural Resources (DNR) notcd that the park was one of two
grant-funded projects statewide that had not yet been developed per the grant application. The
primary barrier to park development was the lack of public access to the site -- all plans had
been for the primary access to be off the future extension of Landmark Drive.
To construct a roadway on parkland funded by this grant would require a "conversion request"
from the City to the State, with ultimate approval from the National Park Service. The
conversion request would require that It. ..All practical alternatives to the conversion have been
evaluated and rejected on a sound basis" and that substitute recreational property, of equal,
current market value to the land being taken by the conversion be provided. In addition, the
request would require an opportunity for public input.
The existing service roadway is an 8 - 10 foot wide asphalt and dirt path allowing access to
water wells within the park. Access at the connection to Marlo Blvd. is by a locked chain link
fence, allowing pedestrian entry but not vehicle entry (except for service vehicles). This gate
and fence was installed by Parks and Recreation in early 1989. A chain link fence was also
placed at the south end ofParkstream Avenue, prohibiting all access to the parkland, in response
to complaints from residents in the Countrypark subdivision about undesirable nighttime activity
in the park.
Several of the residents of the Countrypark subdivision have been in frequent contact with the
Parks and Recreation Department during the past few years, expressing concerns about the future
of the parkland. Over the course of several letters, the Parks and Recreation Department has
promised that the existing access road would remain solely as a non-public service road for the
park, with the proposed main entrance road to the park coming not closer than 100 to 150 feet
from the Countrypark subdivision.
Therefore, while this corridor might be easiest to construct, the conditions of the parkland
acquisition grant and previous commitments to the residents of the Countrypark subdivision
could make this a difficult to implement solution.
The other two alternatives follow the Landmark Drive corridor -- one would provide for
construction along half the corridor, from tvfarlo Blvd. to Saber Drive in the Countrypark
Subdivision; the other would continue past Saber Drive to Enterprise Road, tying in at the
existing signal.
Environmental permits have been issued for the construction of Landmark Drive extension (from
Enterprise to Union Street), and the construction plans were about 70 percent complete when
funding for the project was removed from the Capital Improvements Program. Priority for
Landmark extension was reduced when the Pinellas County School Board decided not to develop
I:" .
. ,
~ ~',
,.....
",i
.."1' " . '." ~
Michael Wright, City Manager
October 7, 1993
Page Three
their parcel (to the south of the park land) for a proposed middle school.
Drainage along the corridor is a concern, and any addition of impervious surface would require
adequate storrnwater retention. Construction of a temporary facility not in confonnance with
the permitted plans would require a modification to the permit process. The Public Works I
Engineering Group has indicated that any route along this section should conform with the
existing plans.
A connection to Saber Drive would require an approximately 1,200 foot section of Landmark
to be built, to a dead end point about 300 feet north of Saber, so that the roadway's low point
for drainage could be accessed. The estimated construction cost is approximately $ 200,000,
and, under ideal conditions, would take at least a year from Commission approval to complete
the plans, go through reviews, bid, and construct.
However, the residents of the Countrypark subdivision had previously petitioned the City to not
connect Saber Drive to Landmark Drive when it was extended to the south of Enterprise; the
City agreed and the connection was not included in the roadway construction plans. This
previous commitment also makes this a difficult project to implement.
A longer section of Landmark, from Marlo Blvd. to Enterprise Road, would cross some
jurisdictional wetlands area; requiring construction of a bridge over the wetlands, retaining
walls, and full mitigation of the wetlands area. Estimated construction time, from Commission
approval to completion, would be approximately 15 months and would cost in the vicinity of $
400,000 to $ 500,000.
It would not be feasible to build a temporary roadway along this section, because of the wetlands
mitigation requirements.
In summary, the three potential "back routes" all have serious obstacles -- significant expense,
time to con~truct, environmental concerns, previous agreements with the adjacent subdivision,
and contractual agreements for a Federal grant.
,"I
'j
:,j
I
J
,I
1
i
I
Oftice Df Public Affairs
11 g N. Ft Harrison St.
Clearwater, FL. 34615
(813) 443-3748
(813) 4~2-0375 fax
J7.-e.
-3~
~Ielarwa\er. rlolloa
Churcn ot Scientology. Flag Sef\lice Or
'OnJ93 '2:35:56 Page 2 of 3
The Church of Scientology@
VIA FAX
#. . ' , ~. ~~~t\..
... I .~.;
October 7, 1993
~ ;I\"'\:':~'-":',i 1"'\
....U". II} ..H...i.:'. \\,:
Clearwater City Commission
City Hall
Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL. 34616
, ~'."':" .,
I ,~_;':'."
.. 01' 0 t'1 19L)"'J
l :'Jte ll~ \. f . IJ~>
I 'l'V e"f t' , '"
Ll ..... i\n
Dear Mavor Garvey m1d Conunissioners,
. .
The Church of Scientology is plumung on holding u large intemational religious event in the Ft.
Harrison Religious Retreat this Friday. 111is is one of our alumal events and,we anticipate about
3,000 people will be attending the event in Clearwater as it is traditionally popular with our
parishioners and this year is turning out to be more popular than ever. The vast majority ofthe
attendees will be parking in the downtown and crossing S. Ft. Harrison 81. to enter the Ft. Harrison
Retreat.
Unfortunately, we have had less than a week's notice of the specific date for this Event ourselves
and did not knO\'l' until recently the volume of people planning to attend. It is turning out to be a
very popular event.
I
I
I
'.,
The event itself will nll1 from 8 pm on Friday night until! am Saturday morning. It is starting late
here because the main event will be in Los Angeles (at 6 pm their time) and will be transmitted, via
satellite, live around the country to our Churches and to Clearwater as well.
Due to the number of people we anticipate attending t1le event, we asked the Department of
Transportation (DOT) for permission to close South Ft. Harrison to facilitate the volume of
pedestrian traftic we al1ticipate to increase their safety. DOT is willing to approve a permit to do
this but need a Resolution from the City Commission OK'ing the "event". \Ve have been told by
DOT that they will waive their usual time requirements and approve t1le closure of 81. Ft. Harrison
ifwe can get Ulem a completed application by Friday at noon.
We are also working with Lt. Hardman of the Clearwater Police Department to provide off-duty
officers to facilitate traffic routing for the time of the closure. We are working also with Bob's
Barricades to provide the proper planning and signage for the anticipated closure. The traffic
rerouting can apparently can be done as vehicular traffic will be at a low enough level that no traffic
problems will be caused by the closure.
On the day \~rhen we can fully trust each other, there will be peace on earth.
L. Ron Hubbard
-- from Scientology: a New
Slant on Life OCopyri!:# \9($. \97a, \9G3 by
L }(on Hulibll"d All n!#lls
C Copyri2J!t1993 by dIe Churdt of Scientology. Flag Service Organlzatlon.lnc. Scientology III :l tndemar\.; and service m\l.fl: o\\'llcd
by ReliSioU5 Technology Center and is ulied with itS' pennission.
..........'"...-
:-. .~', '
, .',
.'f' .
. ':" '~ . <':; ';', ' ." ,- ~. <... ~ " i..,
......:~;.~W:..:~:..,.,~ .~.. ~.. '. .: +: .:. ~_'~ .. . :.H:~~).~: :,,: '* :~}. " ;';"
~ ~'" .': .~ ..
.' ,
,", ".,'. >d~
, ... ,,.:..., ".. :... . ..:. ...:'
"t
.
".
~.!I ,.'
o .
...
III
a.
-lJ
,
~t:Et~~:t:JaJ.b.V'i=-.
pEiTa\J~ .
J.; I ~
~
u\
\l
rI.
Ul
-
~
.; .
, .
.,
...
Po LIc.;.6' oFflC6i:..
p \e..G"'c... T' I t--1 Co
" '-~FF ~ <..
tz,.CAO ~U>$e:D
A~eAt:>
~"2.DOI .
'2. --r{?e: J[t. wi
~AO c:::.LO$eD
k-\ P ve:, ~\J p...
<
\. .'
~. O?a::.~
2> 'Ft-1 - \l PM , f~\?AY
~.-r.~.
"1
"
,.,{
. ',. ~
, .;,.
: ~
. ."1
":.;,
',',' '.
\ . .:'"
J ,. ,:~' '. . " ~.: l ~,
" .": " ~ i'~, S,", - .
", c"
,. .
,"~: . . t / I
. ) ~..
'",.... .f. " i "
,"}
.~!. '
.l :., :
: ~"'~~~ .:-;'" ,
,", ,".,.',
.... ,
.. .
.. ,.,..
. ~.
, ,\ ,"
., '\
"
"
f'lR- -:. 3l{;
I I
. ~ \?~"t"t>"'~
...(.
, .
. .
I '
Ro,AD ~\(:,14c:, t-tE~De'P ~
-+ - 1'l?e. :nt::~ a~ "- ~A~~
''5 - NO. "7 ~(:,Nc;,
8 - U(':)~,..S fOfl.-I1'f'E. JIt'~
~. G1b.~.:PE:.~ ~.
. f'o )..,1c..cr' 0 rF\C.G'JC.. ./ /
"P 1R.Ec..TI)~ t.
'T'ItAFFlC-
~ PE:TOIJF- 1 ?-oK> Cl-O l-E t>
A \\t:.AJ:' . AA~O
1.00' 100' zoo' ~ -(
. FOsz..( H.Afl-f2-\~N f:>..V~.
2. - 'T'{f'r: -m: aM I .h
sz.oA" c..t.OSe P 11-
t'srou~
').
. ",'
E'JENT
N€j
!l;
et::rz... e,) I~~~
. '.
"
",. "',
. -,I
",'.
",,'
'.!
f~~YL0o(k -t6r
-{ fc Vv\ =it: 3 G
\rY1 Ci \J e:. J
~
I ()/J ~/7 3
..'
. ~r..~,'..
<' i;:;~",,;
....
J,,,
...........---.. --- .... ....
",..,.,..,..;.:......j.r-
:..,,,~ .; ,
Item #
CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION
Agenda Cover Memorandum
3'7.
Meeting Date
/C/'7(Cf3
SUBJECT: Feasibility study - New Bridge at state Road 60 and Intercoastal
Waterway
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Authorize staff to proceed with the advertisement of an
RFP and begin the selection process for the provision of Professional Services
to perform a feasibility study relative to a new FDOT bridge at state Road 60
(Memorial Causeway) and the intercoastal waterway.
BACKGROUND:
In March of 1993 the city of Clearwater applied, through the Local Governnent
Cooperative Assistance Program, for a joint City-state bridge feasibility study.
The study was estimated to cost approximately $100,000, which was to be shared
$50,000 City and $50,000 state.
We were informed in June, 1993 that, while our proposed project had been ranked
No. 5 among all applications, the funds available for such projects were to be
completely consumed by the first and second ranked proposals.
We have learned through conferences with District 7 FDOT officials that should
the city desire to pay 100% of the cost of the feasibility study (still estimated
at $100,000) the study could go forward under the City's auspices and maintain
the full validity that would have been associated with the Cooperative Assistance
Program scenario. This simply means that we will have our scope of services,
proposed contract, and fee schedule examined and approved by FOOT in the same
manner as if they are co-sponsors. We anticipate having the consultant hired
approximately 120 days from Commission approval.
.
I
I Revi ewed by: Originating Dept. Costs: N/A
Public Works
Legal N/A 041- (Current FY)
Budget N/A User Dept. Funding Source:
Purchas i ng N/A Capt. [~.
Risk Mgmt. N/A Advertised: Operating
CIS N/A Date: Other
ACM N/A Paper:
Appropriation Code(s)
Other N/A Not required X
Affected parties
notified
Not required X
Commission Action
Approved
Approved
w/condltlons _____
Denied
Cont'd to
Attachments:
letter from FOOT dated 6/14/93
letter to FOOT from W.e.Baker
dated 2126/93
sr60bg-1.agn
"
-- ..
, '
District Seven
Planning/Mail station 7340
11201 N. McKinley Drive
Tampa, Florida 33612
8EN G. WATTS
S~CRn ARl'
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOKTATIO~
LAWfON CJlILf.S
GOvr..RrI0R
June 14, 1993
. ,". .. ,. ..... ....... ... ~" . .. _....- ~ . n,
i i. I'; Ir: !': 1I.1";.1I,! I~ 'I
, ,r.!:1211993 tLI}
.. L..,
"... ..___.__-.-___J
, ' ,...."(
I': ' ;." .;...;';!.:;..:.;..:;..~:;."':.~IJ._ ~.'
Mr. William C. Baker, Director of Public Works
city of Clearwater
P..O, Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748
RE: 1993/94 Local Government Cooperative Assistance Program (50}50)
Dear Mr, Baker:
Enclosed is the rank-order listing of eligible 50/50 projects and
the notice of announcement of funds for the 50/50 program. The
projects were ranked by criteria set in accordance with Section
335.20,F.S. and Rule Chapter 14-89, F.A.C. The criteria considers
factors such as level of service, safety, production "readiness",
and consistency with the local comprehensive plan and the TIP.
District Seven was allocated $749,280, 'Which would provide $111,000
for project #1 and $638,280 for project #2 as shown.
Beginning July 1, 1993, Joint Participation Agreements (JPA's) may
be signed for projects #1 and #2. The District intends to sign
JPA's for these projects by July 30, 1993. If adequate funds are
not available, the District will make the funds available to the
next highest ranking project for which adequate funds are
available.
If I can be of further assistance, please call me at 813{975-6427.
Sincerely,
PUCH.jC'{(:." ,-";\";--'.~;;:~H
U '.
If~!"~fl. 111'11. ;:::; rtj'NS ENV
I~ ~!3 r.i n:'.~u 1.', '~.i;,~l \:1 r-y CI TM
9 0 II :J U
o PH 0 JRI. II MH Cl DB
COPIES TO: _
FILE, ~
Ed~ ~ t>J~
Eddie Jean Satchel
Transportation Planning Coordinator
-------.............
EJS{ejs
(93Igcap)
"
,
. ~
.;.. '.1
,
~
.' .
, .',
}.
~,'.
.
~
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT SEVEN
. I
FY 93/94 50/50 PROGRAM RANKING ORDER
RANK APPLICANT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1 Hillsborough County
Intersection Improvement; At
56th Street & Sligh Avenue
2 Hernando County
Reconstruction/multilaningi
CR 574/Springhill Drive from
Waterfall Drive to CR 587/Mainer Blvd.
3 Pasco County
New construction/multilaning;
Zephyrhills By Pass West from CR 54 to
SR 54/CR 579
4 Hillsborough County
Intersection Improvement; At CR 574
& Lakewood Drive.
5 city of Clearwater
Feasibility studYi Clearwater Draw
Bridge
6
Pasco County
Reconstruction/rnultilaning; CR 77/Rowan
from SR 54 to Plathe Road
. I
7 Pasco County Reconstruction/rnultilaning; CR 77/Rowan
from Plathe Road to Massachusetts Ave
8 City of Dade City Paving; West Main street from 17th
street to 21st street
9 City of pinellas Park Reconstruction/widen; 43rd Street.
70th Avenue to 78th Avenue
10 City of Pinellas Park Reconstruction/widen; 60th Street
98th Avenue to L02 Avenue
11 city of Pinellas Park Reconstruction/widen; 102 Avenue
from G6th street to US 19
12 City of Largo Upgrade/Add continious left turns;
SR G8G/West Bay Drive from Missouri
Avenue to Clearwater/Largo Road.
94admwkl
~
\. ;.
',~ r
'; L
";, .1
?' ':
, 1',
.' .~. ,
" I'
....:,..:
.;':;,,1,
-'
.,
.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NOTICE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF FUNDS FOR THE
:f
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COOPERATIVE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The Secretary of the Florida Department of Transportation, in
the appropriation of $5 million in state matching funds for the
forthcoming fiscal year (~993/94) under the Local Government
accordance 'with Section 335.20(5) I FloriQa Statutes, announces
;,
Cooperative Assistance Program. These funds shall be available
for the program beginning July 1, 1993. The following amounts
in accordance with Chapter 14-89, F.A.C. and Section 335.20, F.S.
have been allocated to each of the seven Transportation Districts
District 1 $661,854
District 2 $586,401
District 3 $409,690
District 4 $920,700
District 5 $960,274
...
District 6 $711,801,
District 7 $749,280
5,000,000
'.' ,'.
1.
',', '
',..~~.
. ,
.;
,
,','
, '-. ,~. t',
. ' " .' t'
U,' ,
'.' '
,.
, >
. ~r ~:'i, '. '
,".I '
..~ .
CI'rY
o F
CI.JEARWA'rER
POST OFFICE BOX 4740
C L E ^ n W ATE RI F LOA lOA 3 ~ 6 1 B . 4 7 ~ 8
February 26, 1993
Mr. David A. Twiddy, Jr., P.E.
District Director of Planning and Programs
Planning/Mail Station 7340
11201 North McKinley Drive
Tampa, Florida 33612
Dear Mr. Twiddy:
The C,ity of Clearwater, Florida respectfully submits the enclosed applicat10n for
participation in the Departnlcnt's "Local Government Cooperative Assistance
(50/50) Programming" for fiscal year 1993/1994.
The project as proposed by the city is to perform a Feasibility/Planning Study at a
cost of approximately $100,000 to replace the functionally obsolete "Clearwater
Draw" bridge with a more efficient structure. Given the present life expectancy of
the existing structure it seems prudent to now begin the necessary planning to
determine the feasibility of replacing the existing structure.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should additional information be required by
you or your staff.
Very truly yours,
V~C~_
William C . Baker, .
Director of PUblic Works
WCB:jl
Enclosu res
o
, "
. .,' , ",
. , ' \',." ".' ~.
. , . . .' ,\ . .' .. . . . ,~ ,
CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
3~ Meeting oat/D/7lcf3
SUBJECT: NEW SOLID WASTE COMPLEX (93-24) 1701 N. HERCULES AVENUE.
.,
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract for the construction of the SOLID WASTE
COMPLEX (93-24) to C,A. Oakes Construction Company, Inc., of Tampa, Florida, for
the sum of $1,649,474.30 which is the lowest responsible bid received in
accordance with the plans and specifications, to be financed with a twenty-year
loan from the City's central insurance fund with twenty equal principal payments
of $82,473.72, together with interest at the cash-pool rate, due on September 30
of each year, beginning September 30, 1994,
00 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND: The City of Clearwater has needed a new Solid Waste Complex for some
time. The present complex, located at 1180 Russell Street, is old and inadequate.
The buildings are not economically repairable and the yard is not large enough
to support the needs of the Solid Waste Division. This has been compounded by
the encroachment of the Wastewater Treatment Plant which was necessitated by the
Federally mandated advanced waste-water treatment requirements.
A new Solid Waste Complex has been designed for 1701 N. Hercules Avenue. The
site plan has been approved by the Development Review Committee and the city
Commission. Bids have been solicited for the new complex. The bid tabulation
and summary is attached. C.A. Oakes Construction Company, Inc., was the low bid
at $1,649,474.30. Our engineers' estimate of the project was $1,826,726.50 which
includes an administrative building, a container maintenance building with a
detached storage building, a washrack and a paved yard for vehicle and equipment
storage.
The project does not include construction of the special facilities associated
with recycling, but does include the underground sewer and water services for
such future operations.
The available cash balance of $11,302,335 as of June 30, 1993, in the city's
central insurance fund, of which $6,226,817 is represented by unreserved retained
earnings, is sufficient to fund this contract and the related loan. Interest on
the loan has been included in the FY 1993/94 Solid Waste operating budget. A
first quarter amendment will include $82,474 to cover the first principal
payment.
I I I
I Revi ewed by: I Originating Dept. I Costs: $1 .649.474.30 Commission Action
I Public Uorks/Enginee~ I
I Legal I I
N/A I (Current FY) $1.649.474.30 Approved
I ~t I
I Budget ~. I I. Funding Source: Approved
I User Dept. I
I Purchasing I Public Yorks/Utilities I w/conditions _____
N/A I /ft ".., .?J . Capt. Imp. X
I Denied
I Risk Mgmt. N/A I Advertised: Operating
I CIS I Continued to
I N/A IDate: 07/29/93 & 08/06/93 Other
I ACM N/A Ipaper:st. Petersburg Times
I Appropriation Code(s) Attachments:
lather .^'. ;- I Not requi red
V..~-- ) 315-96436-563600-534-000 1 Bid Tabulation & Summary
I I ,/.;.-1 Affected parti es
I: S~bmi~te~, by:,' I
i' I
I ", ! , . , . . j J - I notified
t I \ ,. . ; I r -. I
V\ '.-
". '.... .;""'" ~'~
I Ci ty Manager I' Not required I
L I
Iwcomplx.lI\ln I
M
Cl'I
Cl'I
..-l
'"
0
P:
r.l
!Xl
0
Eo<
rJ
0
fi<
0
Jo:
r.l
r.l
II
..
r.l
~
Q
l'
"l Q
I ~
"l
11 ~
'<
"oJ M
..:l Cl'I
~ Cl'I
1: ..-l
0
:J
\D
'l N
;.0
11 Eo<
~ III
~ tJ
t!l
~ tJ
'-i o<C
..:!
':)
'n ><
o<C
Q
III
.. 15
~
0 =:
c., Eo<
':Il
Cl ..
1-1 fil
CIl Eo<
o<C
r.. Q
0
t!l
~. Z :z;
~~: 0 H
ti.' 1-1 :z;
,. r.l
". j Po
'*1. 0
l! ::J
'it ~ Q
~ H
~~ ~ !Xl
l'~
.;.,
?
.~
~.
'j
j
i
"
~
~ ~ ~ 8 51 8 8 8 8 8 8 g 8 8 8 g 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8
... 0 oj .. .. ... .. g ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ .. ,,; ~ ~ ~ :!l ~ ~ ::: <S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~
u r: ., ~
!~i ... ..; ..' ! ~ ~ .. ~ wi ~
.. ...
2
t
~ 8 8 ~ .. ... ~ ~ ., 0 ~ 8 8 II 8 0 g 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 ~ 8 8 ~ 8 ~ 0
.. ... .., .. .. ..
~ ... .; .. ,.; .; - e .; : .. ~ 0 .; .. 0 ~ ~ ;:; ? ~ ~ ~ ~ d ... :!i l!i ~ ~ ~ ,,; "i-
f ~ ~ ~ ~ N
0 .., '" ~ ... '! ... ~ ..
u ~ ,.; ... .. ;;; ,.; ;;; Ii ;;; ,,;
~ E .. ~
.. ..
:::5cr
~~...
'~ ~
~u:!
8 8 on 11 lG 0 ~ 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 g
. ~
C ~ oj 0 .; .. ,.; ... 2 .. ~ ~ 8 ~ .. 2 ~ 8 ~ 0 8 on 8 ~ ~ d g 0 ..; " ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~
... .. :l ... Ol ~
" ~ ~ " .. ..
j!:'" 0 ... ,. ,.; ..: ..; ~ 0 .; Ii ... ;(
:! '" ~ .. ...
~~ :: . ~
U -
B
~ 8 8 ~ 8 ~ g 2 ~ 8 8 8 g 8 g :'! 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 ;;; g
on
L ~ on 0 ,,; .. N .; ... :: .. ~ ~ ~ 8 .. ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~, :il R ~ 8 ~ 0 ;:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.: 0
on ~
"! .. ....
.. .. on N ~ ~. ~ ,.; ,.; ~ .;
g'" .. .. 2
u~
15~
~~
go;
~8
.. ..: ..: ..: is 0 0 5 ..; ..: z :r ... ... 0 0 0 :r :J Ii :r ... .; .; ...; .; ...; j
.J .... .J .J .J .J 0 u ... .J u u :! .J .J .J .J .J
- ~ ~ ~ .5 :5 :5 :5 * ~ .... :5 ~ * :5 ~ :5 ~ :I :I 0 r - - r - ?
~ -
t .. " - r - - - '" - on N ., :i; 0
0 g ~ ..'
:i ~ ~
..,
~ ~ ~ ~
5 l5 ~
VI ~ 5 ~ ~
g ~ :s S
~ ~ ~
~ i5 f 6 Oil ~ ~
" ~ "
~ ~ " ~ t
a i!l ;l
2 ~ i5 :l ~
~ " a:
;;; ~ z
3 ~ ~ I ~ ~
0: ., i5 ... f
~ 0 ~ ~ ;!:;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l!l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. C! u h
~ ~ tl i5
~ i: \I; ~ ~
... ~ ~~
~ t ~ l;(
~ ~ ~ ~"'
'" ;; ~!l!
0 c .. Ili!:
.... z e~ l!l.... q ~ ...
~ ~ ~"' .
~... ...
i h .. jI; i~ ~
~ .... S~ di ...
~ ~ ~ g h ! ~
5 .., " i!l.. L
;:: t .. r;j r;j .... 0 ...... ::(0
" ~ ... z :r ~ ;i C>
g Z '" "'0 ~~ i!l ..
> ~ i !~ "'.. i
~ i ~ )( ~ :i lj"
5" r;j ~ .. g~ ~~ .. U
~ .. z i!: ~ .. ci i i~ .,
It c r;j z i~
c i z ~ z 2 )( ~ .. " ~ ., i!l~ r
~ ., 0 ... ~ t ~ ~~
~ c ~ ....
,. .. i cj "' !; (} 51 .. ~~ ..~
~ .: .., ... .... ~ ... ~ ... ~u J~ ~5!
~. ~ z :!l ~ ... .... ~ (}~ ~:
~ ~ iii ~ '" a .... '" i !Z '" ~ IS~ ~~ 2"
~ ... ~ .J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ i t;;lj
.... ~ ll; is ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 11~ ~I
~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 0 i!l!
.., .. ,; .,'"
" .., ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ !!! f5 ... u s;.... ~~ ~~
~ ~ Il :l ... ~ Z r;j ci .... o~ o~ io
... ~ ~ ! .... .... .... Z ~ ci 0; ~ 0 ~~ ~E ~o
...; c ~ ~ ~ " :1 ~~ ~~ 2~
" ~ 13 ~ ~ 1< ~ '" ~ ., ..: " Ii lj ... "'
" ~ ~ ~ 25 2 ~ ., 0: 0: ~ i!i ., ~ j ~ 'i 0 IS ...... :;;!l! .,.... i~
z ., 0 .... i .... ~ ~ t: ~ ~~ ~~ ~i
ill ., ~ ~ ~ u Z , Z il: ~ i .... Il .. ~ .... ~~
'" a! ~ c u ~ i ~ ~ 4 .... ~ .... .. .. ~ ~ i ;l:Z S~ ii U
!It ~ so ::l Z ! ~ ~~ gi
!:: lj u u ,. .. ,. 0 cL ..: ~ ... Q ....
'" " i .. Ii: J U 0: ~ '" 0: U t !Ii U cJ ~ ~ ~ u tl :Ii
... u ~ ... .... ,; ::> ., z " ,; ~ ~ I it ~ "':1
z .. t;' .... j ~ .... is ':J a: .: ;:: ~ ~~
::> '" 0: 0: 2 3 0: .. !!! ~... "':E
\1 ~ ; . ~ .. , e e ~ ~2 ~~ ~~
2 N :, . :. :. :l 1j . :.. ~ .. :!l . z~ h
- '" ... !Z "
~ .. ~ c ti ~ ~ ~ t .... ~ t 0 ti ~ t; i ti ti ~ 0 ~ ~; ~ ~ 2~ ~~ Ii" ~i ~i
! ;., u ~ 8~
Ii: U i :1 ~ i i i i ~ i i ti ~ i l; ~ i!i H
~ .... t; .... .... ~ " .... .... .... ., .. ... .... " i ....~ ~~ ....~ ~ "
lZ~ .. ~ g <II ~ .... g i !I? ~ '" ~ :r '" .... .... oil i U g g n
... t; ~ ~ ~ ~ z ll! z z 5 ~ g.. ~~ ~~
~ ~ It 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 So
~u ;; u u u u u u u u u u il: u u u u u u u u:S u~ u...
3 ' ..: ,.; ,.; . on oj ,..: ci ,,; d ,.; ,.; . on oj ,.: .; .,; ~ ::i ;:j . :d ~ ,.; ~ ~ d ,.; .; ~
~~ - ... .. " ... .. ... ...
~
u ~
~s
o c
u 0
.. u
"3..!.
] ~ ..
.. u1l
..... ~~-:-
~'
.. .
u
..
~ L!~o
1! 2 ",U
~ ~ ~.5 c:
.. ii5 ~ '0 0
~o ~J'g
lL- u..S
~.~ E j g
0'2 J!'Ou
to c; 0 !::.......
> M:g~M:t~~
a: ';iC~~~&1
~ ,~~ ~ ~ ci ~ u
~ ~~~~
~ ~~~~
~ ~c3c3~
, .
,
.
, 1
\...'
\...
'-
'-.
'-
l-
'--
'--,
'-
\..
'-'
. ,~
.....
......
'--
'-'
\.....
-
.'.1'
'!. .
"."
;'.
BIDS SOLICITED
- 36
1"1,,)' Ander'son I Inc.
113n2 F'r.osper'it.y Far'ms ncJ., 13(1
Palm Beach Gardens, FL. 33410
.......
.......
.Barton-Malow Company
2055 Wood st. Suite ~10~
~ t F"L ~4~~- -9~E~
.3 a r. a so' a , . .:....:~ '.. ,. -,' .:~.:>
,,-.
Bt'.adley Const:r'l.Ic.:tion Co., Inc.
F'. O. Bo:: 6875
Clearwater, FL. 34618-6875
Pet ar. R. Bt"oV/rl Con s t:., I nc: .
P.O. 130:: 4100
Clearwater, Florida 34618
1'1i \::e C.':\r.ter' Constr'ur.:ti on, Inc:.
1227 9th Avenue, West
Er".aden \:on, Fl or. i cia ~3420~)...j"3,''1
Cnnsolidated Bldg. Concepts, Inc.
211 Belcher Road
Clearwater, FL. 34625
Ct"'eative Contr'ac'tor.s, Inc.
620 Dr'e\-J St.r'eet
Clearwater, FL. 34615
Danis Industries CorpDration
P.O. Bo:: 598021\-
Orlando, FL 32859-8024
Eveland' Brothers, Inc.
12790 A~tomobile Blvd.
Clearwater, FL. 34622-~719
. I..'
G~ealer Bay Construction
6875 Ulmerton Road
Largo, FL~ 34b~1
Hennessy Constr'uc t: i an Sc~r'v i. c es
P . (1. B lon: ,. 3 1 (I j'"
st. F'p.b~r' sb tlt"'g, r--1.. . 3~~7~3:J".-:.:t 107 .
'\'/
""i.i
,',
"F,
'. .
., ;, ~'.;
',1'. '
. .'
!,,"'.' :
I..:<~t'.:,
.... "
,.....
r,i.i~. ..
". ,....J:
.; .
. .
I. .
Bandes Construction Company
:3~5l)76 tJ. s. H~."y M 19 l\lot".t h
Palm I'lar'bor., FL. 34683
1'1. Bone, Inc.
P.O. Etm: 1502E30
Cape Coral, FL. 33915
Brasfield ~ Gorrie Gen. Cont.
851 Trafalgar Court, Suite 209
Maitland, Florida 32751
Cal ad('1si Cons t.r'uct i on Co.
8720 115th Avenue, North
largo, Florida 3~643
(~c)le [~r'g.. ~~ Carls.tr'Ltctor's (~or'p.
1201 Cedar street, Unit ~D
Sa f e I: y H a ,... b CJ r', F lor' i d a 3., 6 9~)
Cw: Cons t.r'Llc t i C.lr\ Company
5225 Central Avenue
st. Petersburg, FL. 33710
Damon Constr'uction, Inc.
F'. o. Bo:.: 15
Tarpon Springs, Florida 346E38
Elkins Constructors, Inc.
~501 Beverly Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32210
Gr' ea t: 1~I()nLlment Cons'l:r'uct i on Co.
1 ~:520 loJ. L i. n ebiHI(]11 Avenue
Tampa, FL. 33624
P.J. Hayes, Inc.cJba Tandem Const....:..
4.'101 Ash ton Road, Sui te G
Sarasota, FLA. 34233
G.H. ,Johnson Const:'t"uction Co.
5300 W. Cypress St., Suite 261
Tampa, Florida 33607
",
I;; t.';'
I. k.
:j.,.
.,' .
" .
. t{.
\:.....
'";,1'''
. 'U
. '.tf
, ';
:~~
. ';:
......,
-'
.....
. --'
.J
......
......
.-./
'..-'
....
.....
~
: ."
'.-1
1 '
........
.......
I
.-,
......
j
.......
~
. t.
~
'"
'-
,-.
\....
\...,
'-
..... .
"--.'
......
,-.
'.," >
",
, .
, '. ~ <
"
(:
"" .
, ;.1 ,r
, '
, ,",
. '
",-t..
Kalemeris Canst., Inc.
P. O. DOl: 15422
Tampa, Florida 33684
.
.
r
Kobl a,' Cons'tr'ucl:or's ~~ Eng.
2009 NW 67th Place
Gainesville, Plorida 32606
Lincoln Construction,
6727 1st Avenue South
Sl.Iite 101
St. Petersburg, FL.
Inc.
3::3'('0;:"
W.G. Mills, Inc.
3301 Whitfield Avenue
Sarasota, FL. 34243
':-!
';,
'r",
. .. .
,. ----- .----.. -. ,. ..-..... . ..
. , , ",', , h"
l<immin~3 Contr'act.ing Car'p.
P.O. Be):.: 50'78
Tampa, FL. 33675-5098
'-'
I
-....)
I
Metric Constructors. Inc.
5404 Cypress Center Drive
Tampa, Florida 33631-1141
-.....I
1
,
"
I'f'
...J
,I:
'"
\.3
.....I
David Nelson Construction Co.
3483 Alternate 19
Palm Harbor, FL. 34683
'-.../
....i
C. A. Oakes Constr'l.lction Co., Inc:.
14409 Not-.th Nebr.asl::a AYenL.tr~
Tampa, FL. 33613~2226
Hensel Phelps Canst. Company
f~' . o. B 0 ),( I)
Greeley, Colorado 80632-0710
,.......
Vogel Brothers Building Company
2720 Drane Field Road
Lakeland, Florida 33811
Walbridge Contracting, Inc.
4.1 c) l'Jiu-'e Blvd" Su i te ,9C:>i)
Tampa, FL. 33619
F.J. Ward & .Associates, Inc.
P.o. BON 1,106
1arpon Springs, Fla. 34688-1106
Wharton-Smith, Incorporated
P.O. BON 471028
Lake Monroe, Florida 32747-1028
R.M. Williams Contractors, Inc.
P.O. 80N 1(3284
, ,
Tampa, Florida 33679
. e:.
, ,...,;.
',^' < '0',1,.; q,',_
.... ,. . .'. . -'. ..' . .', , . . :. ., .' . I '" '." I" ' '. " ,
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
16/'7/13
3~.
SUBJECT:
land Development Code Amendment - Minor Variances
(lDCA 93-24)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION:
Receive proposed Land Development Code amendment concerning minor variances and refer it to the
City Clerk for advertising for public hearing.
[] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
For the past three and one-half years, the City staff has worked to eliminate the code requirements
which resulted in frequently granted variances. With this code amendment, the staff will establish an
administrative, small scale variance approval process. This process will result in a less expensive,
substantially shortened review for minor variances as specified in the ordinance.
The ordinance would allow the Development Code Administrator to grant minor variances as part of an
administrative determination. The Development Code Administrator must consider whether the variance
meets all of the eight standards for variance approval before granting a minor variance. The applicant
has the ability to appeal the decision of the Development Code Administrator to the Development Code
Adjustment Board as a regular variance.
As with the Development Code Adjustment Board and the City Commission, the Development Code
Administrator can establish reasonable conditions which will govern any variance approval.
The minor variances include small variances to side, rear and street setbacks, open space, landscaping,
dock and fence regulations.
An administrative variance process was suggested as part of the "Healey Report", prepared some time
ago to recommend techniques to streamline the land Development Code procedures.
This code amendment will require review by the Planning and Zoning Board and the Development Code
Adjustment Board.
The Commission may wish to also receive input from the Code Enforcement Task Force on this proposed
amendment.
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
, Risk Hgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
COltS:
$ N/A
Total
Commilsion Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Deni ed
o Continued to:
User Dept:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
j/~
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
1m Not Requi red
Affected Parties
D Notified
1m Not Requi red
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Attachments:
DRAFT ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. -90
N/A
o None
Appropriation Codo:
~ Printed on recycled paper
11-
*"
*
*
*
*
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;
AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS WITHIN CHAPTER 45,
CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ESTABLISH MINOR
VARIANCES, AND PROVIDE FOR MINOR VARIANCE
APPROVAL BY THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
ADMINISTRATOR; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Sections 45.02,45.21,45.23, and 45.25, Codeof Ordinances, are
amended to read:
CHAPTER 45 VARIANCES
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL
Sec. 45.02. Authorization for chapter.
The development code administrator may authorize, under prescribed
conditions. the granting of minor variances to the zoning district regulations and
uniform development regulations upon a determination that the application
complies with the standards set forth in this section. The development code
adjustment board may authorize, under t-Ae prescribed conditions, the granting of
variances to the zoning district regulations and uniform development regulations
when the board determines that the application complies with the standards set
forth in this section. The city commission may authorize, under prescribed
conditions, the granting of variances from the sign regulations as provided in
sections 44.55 and 44.09, and from the alcoholic beverage establishment
minimum separation requirements as provided in section 41 .082. The
administrator, the board or the city commission may impose conditions on the
granting of any variance as determined necessary to carry out the intent and
purpose of this development code. The city reserves the full authority to revoke a
variance if any conditions so imposed are not strictly and continuously adhered to.
Under no circumstances shall the development code administrator or development
code adjustment board grant a variance to permit a use not permitted or
conditionally allowed in the zoning district involved, permit any use expressly or by
implication prohibited by the terms of this development code, permit an increase to
the nlaXilnUrn density allowed in a particular zoning district, permit the expansion,
addition to or enlargement of a nonconforming use, or authorize a variance to any
like provision of legislative prerogative.
-It
*
"*
*
*
*
ARTICLE II. APPLICATION AND REVIEW
See. 45.21. Per nlit req uired.
Prior to the construction of any improvement or the placement of any sign to
effectuate an approved variance, a building permit or, if applicable, a sign permit
shall first be procured from tIle city. In approving any variance, the development
code administrator. the development code adjustment board or the city commission
shall specify the period of time for which such permit may be procured. The
development code administrator. the board or the city commission may, upon
written request, grant extensions to such time allotments not exceeding six
nlonths each without notice or hearing.
Sec. 45.23. Procedures.
(1) The development code administrator shall, upon determination that the
application for variance complies with all applicable submission requirements,
receive the application and. excent for minor variance applications. instruct the city
clerk to schedule it for public hearing by the development code adjustment board
or, for a request for a variance from the sign regulations or the alcoholic beverage
establishment minimum separation requirements, by the city commission, and give
notice of such hearing in accord with the requirements contained in article IV of
chapter 36. For minor variance applications. the development code administrator
shall. upon determination that the aIlD1ication for variance complies with all
applicable submission requirements. consider the application and render a decision
unless he or she determines ttlat action must be deferred to allow for additional
information to )le submitted for review.
(21 Exce pt tor mi nor variance~ the =Ffle development code adjustment board
or the city commission shall consider the application and render a decision at the
conclusion of the pUblic hearing unless the board or the city commission
determines that action must be deferred to allow for additional input and review.
(3) A nlinor variance may be approved by the development code
administrator without public hearing or auttlorization by the development code
adjustment board or the city commission. An application for minor variance shall
comply with the submission reCluirements of Sec. 45.22; however. a minor
variance shall not be subject to the notice and hearing requirements of article IV of
chapter 36. An ClQlllicant nlay request to go through the full variance procedures
of this chap-ter iLttle decision made b~ the developrl1ent code administrator is not
accent{!ble.1Q._l!1eill1nli~QnL-AJJ1inQL.~ilJiCl!1f!LIlli!Y.. consist of one or more of the
f n!l 0 vyi!lfE
2
1~ interior parking lot. Variation of the required interior
landscaping for a Q.arking lot of no more than one percent.
@) Side setback. Variation of a side setback of no more than ten percent or
two feet, whichever is less.
lb} Rear setback. Variation of a rear setback of no more than ten percent or
five feet, whichever is less.
(c) Street setback. Variation of a street setback of no more than ten percefll
or five feet, whichever is less:.
(d) Open space. Variation of an open sQace requirement of no more than
five perceo.L.
(e) Fro!lLY8rd open space. Variation of a front yard open space requirement
of no more than five percent.
( f) Land sea nl.D..g..:-
L Abutting streets. Variation of the required width of perimeter
landscaping abuttl.n.g a street of no more than two feet.
;;L. AbuttinU-iliilacent lli.QQerty. Variation of the required width of
perinleter landsc8Qing abutting an adjacent property of no more
than one foot.
igLDock wigll1. Variation of 8 dock width of no more than ten percent.
(hI Dock setback. Variation of a dock setback of no more than ten percent.
ill Fence height. Variation of fence height of no more than six inches.
Jj} Fence setback. Variation of a fence setback of no more than six inches
for the entire fence on anyone side of a lot, or up to three feet for no more than
ten percent of the length of the fence on anyone side of a lot.
l.kJ Fence landscaping. Variation of required landscaping as~ociated with a
fence of no [Tlore than ten Qercent of the length of the fence on anyone side of a
lot.
~gns. Variation of freestanding sign height of no more than two feet, of
freestanding sign setback of no more than two feet on anyone side of a lot, and of
freestanding or attached sign area of no more than ten percent.
3
*
*
*
*
*
*
, ,.'~.
~ ~ ';.
. .;;
.;".
,V".. ._
Sec. 45,25. Conditions and restrictions on approval.
I n granting a variance, the development code administrator. the development
code adjustment board or the city commission may impose such conditions and
restrictions upon the property benefitted by the variance as may be necessary to
comply with the standards set out above, to reduce or minimize any potentially
injurious effect of such variance upon other property in the neighborhood, and to
carry out the general purpose and intent of this development code, Failure to
comply with any sLlch condition or restriction shall constitute a violation of this
development code.
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance have been found to be
consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayo r- Commiss io ner
. Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
. City Clerk
Approved as to form and correctness:
M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
City Attorney
pln\minrvlIri.onl
4
.. :;':'^;"'.,
"
,
I f,:'
\',
(;""':. " ,
, . .d'..
..}' p.", ';",' ',.
. r."\;~
L ..,.',:;....: ,", ..~.,.."?-:..,;l...';
4<.
. . ~
~
~". I( i-k.""," t~ it- 3~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk@
SUBJECT: Closed Session re Charitable Solicitation Case
. COPIES: Michael J. Wright, City Manager
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney
DATE: October 6, 1993
. Mr. . Zimrnet is available for the closed seSSion regarding the Charitable Solicitation
Ordinance case on the following dates:
Wednesday, October 13 - 4:00 p.m. or later
Friday, October 15 - all day
Tuesday, October 19 - 4:00 p. m. or later
. ' . ". , . ~ .
. Please bring your calendars Thursday night in order for us to schedule thisI11eydng'.'
, . .
. I
" :'1
I'. ...., . 'v.
: . , . . '. ..' . ,'" . . .' ,. .1
J',' ,
~ ~..,..f. '. '
"'r"
. ",1
.'
-'I'
.~~~ ~ '." '; . .
"
" ';', '.'
,..
. .,~' ."
.. ,,\' ;'
, <. "',,~ < i
,
" , ~
" (i
',..
, .
.' ,.....::. \" ~
...
,.
....J'cR..:. 1\ \ -kVll\ 1\ (q fur -=IF 34)
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cle~
SUBJECT: Closed Session re Solicitation Ordinance Case
COPIES :
Michael J. Wright, City Manager
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney
DA TE:
October 5, 1993
The Legal Department has
regarding the above reference
October 20, 1993. Therefore,
have set for the 21st.
informed
case, they
we need
me, if any
must get
to reschedule
action is to be taken
back to the Court by
the closed session you
',;
, , ~:. ~
I have asked the Legal Department to obtain several dates on which Mr. Zimmet would be
available. I should have that information Thursday night so we can set a new date.
Please bring your calendars so we can set this and the October sign variance and town'
meetings.
"j-'
I
. :1
'.."" ,.'1,.
,
, , ~
! '
., ~ :
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
40 . 16/'71'73
SUBJECT:
Land Development Code amendment prohibiting parking on grass or other unsurfaced areas in multiple 1
family and nonresidential developments, unless specifically permitted. (LDCA 93-19)
RECOMMEN DA TION/M OTI ON:
Receive proposed Code amendment and refer to City Clerk for advertisement for public hearing.
[J and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
The Code Enforcenlent Division has requested that a Code amendment be prepared to preclude vehicles
and other objects from being parked, displayed or stored on required open space and landscaped areas.
The Code Enforcement Division is finding it difficult to keep displays, storage and parking from occurring
on these areas, given current code language.
The proposed amendment should provide the specificity needed by the Code Enforcement Division to
ensure adequate enforcement.
The Code Enforcement Task Force reviewed the item on September 15, 1993, and recommended its
adoption by a vote of 6 to 1 subject to its application to single family residential properties. Staff would
suggest that, should the Commission desire to pursue this recommendation, a separate ordinance be
prepared for single family properties.
".t.\."...~~~.."..,,,,.,.>.....
Revi ewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACH
Other
~
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
~~ Costl:
~riginating Dept: -
PLANNING & DEVE
-'
. NIA
Total
Commission Action:
o Approved
o Approved w/conditions
o Denied
o Continued to:
$
Current Fiscal Yr.
User Dept:
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
8 Not Requi red
Affected Parties
o Notified
8 Not Requi red
Funding Source:
o Capital Imp.
o Operating
o Other
Attachments:
DRAFT ORDINANCE
o None
Appropri~tion Code:
^
,.tr Printed on recycled paper
,,:
:.' :.<
,',
.: '" ~ ~,
~ .. .\ '
,
~ I",:' ..: (J.",
< ~..,
~...
'....1 '
't<"."
.,I/J"
.p
,!.:
'~
40
MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 5488-93
1. In
"RESIDENTIAL."
1;he
title,
in
the
5th
line,
change
FAMILY"
IlMULTIPLE
to
2. On
"residential."
(5)(a),
1 ,
in
Section
change
""multiple
fami ly"
page
to
,'.}l' I, .',,;t:.:' '..
:';. ~.' ~ ,
,to " .
, .: >.'
y'.'."-'"
; " '- ,'.'::..;-.;,,;.
ORDINANCE NO. 5488 - 9 3
AN ORDINANCE OFTHECITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING
TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION 42.34,
CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO PROHIBIT PARKING, DISPLAYING, OR
STORING OF MOTOR VEHICLES ON GRASS OR UNPAVED AREAS
ZONED FOR I ANY MULTIPLE FAMILY OR NONRESIDENTIAL USE
UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED AS A GRASS PARKING lOT;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARW A "fER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section 42.34, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read:
Sec. 42.34. Parking.
.
.
.
.
.
(5) Surfacing.
(a) Permanent surface. Except as otherwise permitted in subsection (5)(b) of this section, all
unenclosed parking lots, vehicular accessways and driveways shall be improved with a permanent all-
weather paving material which is graded to drain stormwater and which shall be subject to the
approval of the city engineer. No oarkino. displavino, or storino of motor vehicles shall be nermitted
onanv orass or other unoaved area zonl}d fpr anv multiole familv or nonresidential use unless
specificallv approved under subsection (SHbl of this section.
i
'j
I
I
',1
HI
.:'1
. .,"!
.
.
.
.
.
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance have been found to be consistent with the City of
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. .
. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
'PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
'j
:
'..J
.!
!
!
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Approved as to form and correctness:
, .. ~
, "j
i
.1
",:'1
'I
, '~I
";1
,'J
"f
.,
,",1
"j
I
"
I
I
i
I
I
j
. M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
City Attorney
;~ 'i;::.
"
."
<~
, :l
:,.t.
?;:~,
!.'.c:.".:-tJ"-' J. ....::'L....t..l:'....':'
\-:.
'"r ..' >
'.
>;~ .!
",.> ?
" :". ,:.
'. .
. .
, '-: ~:. ~< ,.' ~... ,..: ;."
',,';~
APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET
Agenda #9-1
FOR COMMISSION MEETING October 1993 APPOI NTMENTS
BOARD:Neighborhood Advisory Committee
TERM: Ad Hoc
APPOINTED BY: City Commission
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Not Required
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater
(2 Pinellas County Residents)
MEMBERS: 12
CHAIRPERSON(S): Darrell Collins
MEETING DATES: 2nd Tuesday
PLACE: Annex
APPTS. NEEDED: 1
DATE APPTS: TO BE MADE: 10/4/93
SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: (3) North Greenwood Area, (3) South Greenwood Area,
(3) East Clearwater, (3) At-Large
THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW
REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OF REPLACEMENT BY A NEW
APPOINTEE.
Name-Address-Phone
Date of Original
A ppointment
Attendance
Record
Willingness
To Serve
1. Vacant seat/At-Large - Winfred Infinger resigned
THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE
VACANCIES:
Name-Address-Phone
Comments-Related Experience, Etc.
1
J
1. Stephen Thomas Alosa
2771 Sand Hollow Ct., 34621
H:724-9834 0:442-4111 At-Large
Commercial Real Estate
2. Annie Battle
1109 Fairmont St., 34615
H:447-8644 North Greenwood
Homemaker
3. Bernard Ferrell
2717 Foxfire Ct., 34621
H:796-4146 0:886-0705 At-Large
Pharmacist
4. Jonny Gammage
311-3 S. Arcturas Ave., 34625
442-0527 0:441-3813 At-Large
Real Estate Sales Associate
past work youth center coordinator
5. William C. Graham
1564 Scott Street, 34615
H:446-5030 At-Large
Assistant Pastor, on focus committee
for City's infill housing program
6. Mayme Hodges
1162 laSalle St.,3461 5
H:446-7285 North Greenwood
past Commissioner
Continued
..
"" ., ., j,
,',:;;,....::,'-;-;":./.t.:.:,
.< .":'..,'
.', .' ~.:o
,.: .
NAC volunteer list continued
7. Florence Hosch
1840 Venetian Point Dr., 3461 5
H: 446-2139 At-Large
past member Heath Facilities
8. Ruth Hunter
1024 Applewood Dr., 34619
H:797-9025 0:796-8971 East Clwr
employed w/Great Western Bank
9. Daniel Kensak
1861 Overbrook Ave., 34615
H:447-8151 At-Large
Self employed/general maintenance
volunteers at BayPines VA Hospital
10. Curlee Rivers
1341 Fairmont St., 34615
461-1793 0:449-0455 At-Large
Teacher
". ~"
',. "
. '. ~ "
..'F ...., '
. 1 ",
. ".~), ,\: ,';.
;f,'
\; ';' "
~'. '.; .; , ,J,~ . : '
. . .' ,
<: " ,; :". .:. .....; r-.. -J.. ~.
JU- '. ~ (
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Cler~
SUBJECT: Neighborhood Advisory Committee
COPIES: Michael J. Wright, City Manager
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney
Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager
James Polatty, Economic Development Director
DATE: October 6, 1993
When the Neighborhood Advisory Committee was first established it was required by CDBG
regulations. Since that time the CDBG regulations have been changed to require a Citizen
Participation Plan. The City of Clearwater's Citizen Participation Plan, as approved by the City
commission, calls for the Neighborhood Advisory Committee.
As far as I can determine there is nothing in the current CDBO regulations that would
prohibit the Commission from setting a term length and term limitations for NAC members. This
would require an amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan and the NAC by-laws.
Please let me know it additional information is needed.
..
, " .
.. , . '. , '. , . . '. ...' .
'., , . '.. J "-.,.
" t~
APPOINTMENT WORI<SHEEl'
.. received since pack went out ~ J
FOR COMMISSION MEETING October 7, 1993 APPOINTMENTS Agenda #
BOARD: Planning and Zoninq Board
TERM: 3 years
APPOINTED BY: City Commission
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater
SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: None
MEMBERS: 7
CHAIRPERSO N(S): Ed Mazur
MEETING DATES: 1 st and 3rd Tuesdays
at 1 :30 p.m.
APPTS. NEEDED: 1
DATE APPTS. TO BE MADE: 10/4/93
i
I
THE FOllOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW
REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW
APPOINTEE.
Name-Address-Phone
Date of Original
Appointment
Attendance
Record
Willingness
To Serve
1. Kenneth Hamilton 1987
10 Bay Esplanade, 34630
H: 447-3548 0: 446-2642 (term expires 10/31/93)
NA
NA
THE FOllOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE
VACANCIES:
Name-Address
Comments-Related Experience, Etc.
I
'I
1 . Stephen Thomas Alosa
2771 Sand Hollow Ct., 34621
Commercial Real Estate
*2. Dale Anderson
923 Bruce Ave.,34630
Commercial Real Estate Broker
3. George Athens
1018 Bay Esplanade Dr., 34630
Restaurant Manager
4. Ernie Cline
2074 Sunset Pt.Rd., 34625
Self-employed/building contractor
5. Mark Hatoun
303 Cedar St., 34615
Engineer w/ Pinellas County
6. Dennis Henegar
314 Venetian Dr.,34615
Residential & Aluminum Contractor
7. Bill Johnson
479 E. Shore Dr., 111,34616
Real Estate Broker
8. Jay Keyes
100 Devon Dr. ,34630
Real Esstate Sales
9. William Kirbas
34 Bohenia Circle N, 34630
Financial Planner
Continued
.....'.
~
. "
, . ". . ',' I .' .' ' ." , , . \
, '
:,<' ,:,
'\ ":\:;""","
. 'j' \ :
<,.,
'. 'I
.'
;'; "
; .
.': ~ ." "'.~ : , '
." -,
.',." , .', ,{
t . ' ~.
'..
" " ",.
'.
\.,.: ~,
..:' "j',
:>~ '\".~ - _,; ,...." :i:, ,;. .
Planning & Zoning Board Volunteer List Cant.
10. Nicholas Kudlicka
200 Starcrest 11153, 34625
Self-employed - Potter
11 . James Madden
51 Island Way, 34630
Retired Deputy City Clerk
1 2. Robert Metz
1478 Maple Forest Dr.,34624
President of Public Corp.
13. Shirley Moran self-employed, consultant
240 Windward Passage,#805,34630
,~ l.
'J
;.'~ ..t,,~'H.:t
I
'j
I
. ,
" ':l
\::\'
, .
14. Brenda Harris Nixon Past member Planning & Zoning Board
902 Pinellas St., 34616
15. Bernard Panush Past member Li brary Board
19029 US19N, #1-' 8, 34624
16. Curlee Rivers
1341 Fairmont St., 34615
Teacher
* 1 7 Anthony Salmon
2430 Hazelwood Lane,34623
I
.... ..1
:1
Retired - management consultant
. 'f:
18. Robert Theroux
55 Rogers St.,#206, 34616
Retired civil engineer
19. William Weller
223 S~Venus Ave. ,34615
Administration representative w/Morton Plant
1 ,
"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
I\pplic~1tion for Advisory Rn~rriR
(must be Clearwater resident)
Name. DALE R. ANDERSON, SRA, R.E. BROKER, APPRAISEB
Home Address:
Office Address:
.
923 BRUCE AVE.
:SAME
CLEARWATER, FL.
ZIP:34630
ZIP:
Telephone 446-3745
Telephone
FAX 443-5738
How Long a residen! of 'the City of Cl~cHwater?
Occupation "R.. R_ P}]O{{F.'R r.OMMERCTA5m:~~Xm- TNVF.STME!\JT PROPERTIE5
Field of Education:
Other 'Nork Experience:
SEE ATTACHED RESUME & QUALIFICATIONS
.'
It retired, former occupation AGE; 8-18-46
Community Acti~ites: SEE ATTACHED
Other Inte~ests:
~oard Service (current and past)
Board Preference:
PLANNING & ZONING ADVISORX BOARD
Addilional Comments:
MARRIED 24 YEARS, WIFE ELEANOR-TEACHER PINELLAS
-
COUNTY~ARD' ~ H~VE 4 CHILDREN, '13-23
Signed;. 1<- ~~Date: . 9-22-93
DALE R. ANDERSON, SRA
Please see attached list for 80ards that require Financial Disclosure, PLEASE RETURN THIS
fOnrv1 TO: City Clark's Department P.O. Box 4748 ClearwAterJ Fl. 34618
FlECEIVED
SEP 2 4 199~
CITY CLERK DEPT.
..""",. :"'
I .", .~
~ ~ .
,..
" \
,.' .
.,'
RESUME & QUALIFICATIONS OF
DALE R. ANDERSON, SRA, BROKER, SALES, APPRAISER
FOR~ffiL EDUCATION:
Duluth Area Institute of Technology-Graduate Certificate 1971-72
Architectual Drafting and Design
University of Minnesota - Industrial Education 1966-1969 (Major)
Western State University, Doniphan, MI - Masters Degree in Busi-
ness Administration with a Real Estate Major - 1984 - 1986
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Architectual Draftman - Morgenstern, Stanius & Thorsen 1968-1969
Draftsman, Ruble & Associates, Architect & Engineers, 1970-71
Over the last 22 years, Real Estate Appraiser, Broker and Sales
in residential and commercial properties in Minnesota and Flori-
da. Appraiser for First Federal Savings and Loan, Duluth, l1N.
1971-76.
Anderson Real Estate Appraisal Service, President 1976-82
Anderson and Associates, President 1982 to 1987
Anderson, Golschrnidt & Roberts, partnership, 1987-1991
Marie Powell and Associates, Better Homes and Garden, 1988
pinellas County Property Appraiser's Offic~, CFE 1988-89
ViewPoint Realty International, Inc,,-1991-92.
1993 (Current Dale R. Anderson, SRA, Broker, Sales, Appraiser, Fl., Mn.) .
Designed and built residential homes and apartments. Owned and
managed apartment complexes and commercial property. Court
Appointed Commissioner for Housing" Redevelopment Authority, and
state of Minnesota.
TECHNICAL EDUCATION:
The Appraisal Institute 875 N. Mich. Ave, Chicago Ill. 60611
University of Wisconsin, An Introduction to Appraising.
Appraising Apartments, Augsburg College,
Narrative Reporting Writing, Income Producing Property, Mpls. Mn
R-2 Exam, Case,Study - Single Family, 201, Principles of Income
Property, University. of Madison WI
Marshall & Swift Valuation Servo - Construction cost estimating,
Tax Consideration in Real ~state Transaction, Springfield, MI
The Valuati~n of Leases and Leasehold Interest, Duluth, MI 1980
Application of Market Extractions, Minneapolis,:MN,
Real Estate Project Feasibility Analysis, Duluth MN.
Course VIII, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, Single
Family, Indiana University
Recreational R.E., radison Hotel" Duluth, MN,
Computers as an Appraisal and Financial Analysis Tool,
University of MN - H.P. Financial Calculators, Basic and Advanced
'.',
, "
. ... \
"'J
.'....
,I;'
!~ ~ . ..f:,
, , I
OTHER
Minnesota Mechanics Lien Law, Duluth, MN
Hamline University - Eminent Domain, Bloomington, MN
R-41B and C, FNM, FHLMC Underwriting Procedures Bert Rodgers
school of Real Estate, Orlando, Fl. 1987
Minnesota School of Real Estate Financing
PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS:
The Appraisal Institute R.M. - Certificate #875, 1975
S .R.A. - ,Senior Residential Appraiser - Certificate, 1981
President Duluth - Superior Chapter, 1984 - MN & WI
C.F.E. Certified Florida Evaluator, pinellas County Property
Appraisers Office, Clearwater, Fl. 1988-89
American Savings and Loan Institute, 1971-1976
Home Builders Association, 1971-1977
Minnesota Apartment Association (General Membership) 1979-1981
State of Minnesota Real Estate Brokers License, #0494975' (Current)
Member of Minnesota Board of Realtors, 1983 - Current -
State of Florida Real Estate License - #Bl-OS09828 (Current)
Member of The '~reater Clea~wat~r Association of Realtors (curren~)
Memb~r of The Apprais~l Institute-West Coast Florid~ Chapter (Current)
CLIENTS; & OTHER GENERAL INFORMATION:
FinaI~cial Lending Institutions, Mortgage Companies, Savings and
Loan" Association, Commercial Banks, Credit Unions, At torneys'"
employees Relocation Companies', Merrill Lynch, Executrans r Trans-
america City, County, state and other governmental agencis and
Life Insurance companies
Approved" Appraiser-FNMA & FHLMC #755-016
Approved Appraiser - Banco Mortgage Company, BMC-113 Review for
State of MN.
Church Board Member CHAPEL-BY-THE-SEA Clearwater, Beach,Fl.(Current)
Member of. The Clearwater Beach As~ociation (Current)
- \
. "
,
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Application for Advisory Boards
(must be Clearwater resident)
\.p " , ~.A L,.......... ~ .-J
Name A ,..j.-r-rl?'.-<'J
Home Addr,e9s:
-"+7dH?t~~~ ~~~ D l~
CL ~""-- z'P:?f'-y?
Telephone ?'I ~ ... --rq 6 .... c~<9 (
Oifice Address:
,.",.*~..' ..
~-"'-
,/'
ZIP:
Telephone
How Long a resident of the City of Clearwater? I ''::;' 'i ~CS;
Occupation (} e.... --r/ n.:e:.. ~ Employer
Field of Education:
f;J:;: - fJ U c7 ( ~ S<S
" :"
11 ~ .., E" .. ,." ~', "r
1 " ,,_ ., , \ . I . ')
II .Jj ~ "J. V ...1:"':
SEP 2 8 1993
CITY C1i:nx: D~i'T.
Other Work Experience: . ~
(),)QrfA~~~~ ~rl S~,---'-;,-
SALL-S M~p-
!
"
If retired, former occupation
Community Activites: I~/ C> )>."5c.?oc.... - Woo D ~..,..~ ':;(1 J-
C6/'lW-rl6~ :Vr- CL~.....L.-(.....--r~ r1/G':>
Other Interests: 6-7; 0.00 .----r r 7iZP~"'5fbA:T:.t:J-n~
,Board Service (current and past)
Board Preference:
-!L ~ ,..... r! J ,..{<:;;; '<::. c.....::> ;,.....(."
~~'~;~.pP\- ~J:re.
. \
Additional Comments:
Signed:
~:o
Date:
<1/-rS!~3
Please see attached list for Boards that require Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS
FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618
. .'
"'~d
APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET
* rec'v since pack went out - * * Revised
L/3
FOR COMMISSION MEETING October 7, 1993 APPOINTMENTS Agenda #
BOARD Airport Authority
TERM: 3 Years
APPOINTED BY: City Commission
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater
Special Qualifications: None (5097-91)
MEMBERS: 5
CHAIRPERSON:
MEETING DATES: 2nd Tues., 3:00 p.m.
PLACE: Airpark
APPTS. NEEDED: 1
DATE APPTS TO BE MADE: 10/4/93
THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) SEAT(S) NOW REQUIRE EITHER
REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE.
Name-Address-Phone
Date of Original
Appointment
Attendance
Record
Willingness
To Serve
1. Dr. Theresa Goss 1990
1201 Macrae Ave., 34615
H: 461-1568 (term expires 10/31/93)
past 1 2 meetings YES
present 9/* *excused 3
THE FOllOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FilL THE ABOVE
VACANCIES:
Name-Address
Comments-Related Experience, Etc.
1. William Harry Boudreau
1444 Stewart Blvd., 34624
Retired - Research Manager/Avionics
J
, i
2. George D. Davis III
1962 Harding 34625
President - Swim Dewey (Retail Operation)
Member Environ.Advisory Committee
4. Robert lunt
833-C Keene Rd. N., 34615
prior work (15 yrs) w/Cessna Aircraft
Co.,current work w/aircraft sales & mgmt
3. Daniel Kensak
1861 Overbrook Ave., 34615
self employed/general maintenance
volunteers at BayPines VA Hospital
5. Mike Palouian
1320 Summerlin Dr., 34624
past member Parks & Ree Board
6. Carl Rayborn H:442-0372
1161 Marine St., 34615
retired merchant marine
Pres. Edgewater Dr. Assoc.
7. Vito Resta H:791-8232
1923 Albany Dr., 34623
Retired/28 years Maintenance
LaGuardia Airport
8. H. Virginia Robinson
1005 Amble In., 3461 5
Nurse, Red Cross Volunter
* 9 Dennis Roper
995 lake Forest Rd.,34625
past member this board
Continued
,hi
" r\','
i .~. . , _~ ,~
.\"
. t'/
.. :;:~;}j
Airport Authority Volunteer List Continued
10. Francis J. Werner
1845 Seton Dr or 34623
Past President & Treasurer of a homeowner's
assn., presently BlockChairman, involved in
School Young Astronaut chapter leader
* 11 Winston Wordsworth Retail Store Owner
3035 Countryside Blvd.,Unit 27B,34621
.i.'
I
I
. ,
i
!
I
~
, ,
- - --------.- ~ - ~ -.
, 7, '.: C
I.. I:: :,'; . ::. .. ~ .,", ';,.' , _';
.l._ .:...: \,;,,' L..:. \i ~ ...J'
SEP Z7 '93 09:50
SEP 2 9 1993
CITY CLER;( Dt!r-T.
CITY OF ClEARWATiR
Application for AdvisOl'Y Boards
(mult be Cl.arwatlr resident)
~m. Dennis G, Roper
Home Addresa:
995 Lake Forest Rd.
.
Office Address: 18930 US 19 North
Suite # 600
Clear-..vater J FL.
ClearW"ater.J Fl.
~'P: 34625
ZIP: 84626
Telephone 796-1031 Telephone 536-9696
How Long a r.esldent of the Ci~ of Clearwater? Eleven years
Occupetion Pilot & Reporter Empjoyer Metro Traffic Control
Field of Education:
Other Work Experienco:
25 years as a reporter Ii ournalist
,2 years Mass Commication
2 years Practical Engineering
radio, television & newspaper -
It retirad. tormer oc:cup..ulon
Community Activites:Member & Public Relations advisor, Sk?Crest UnitecL
Methodist Church, advisor; Cub Scouts Peck # 77 - Clearwater
ather Interests: Enviroment & Plannin~:c (I'm a fisherman)
Board Service (current .nd past)
1.- 3 yr, term.. Vice Chair,
~ort Advisory Board
Board PnferCiOCe:
I \VOuld like to return (after a year
of ~ettin~ mY' business in order) to
complete 'WOrk on the Airport Board
Additional Communts: The Airpark is a great asset end needs ~aod man~e-
~'--.. me~ order to remain so.
Signed: . 1_)e,IL-I.'~ (-;. (Ct'-lit D~te: _ 9/27/93
/
Please $~e .tlached U$t for Boards that r8quire FilUlnclal Disclosure. PlEASE RETURN THIS
FORM TO: City ClerkJI Department P.O. Box 4748 Cla.rwltar, FL 3461S
~SEP 24 '93 11:40
P.2
" ':
.
,:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Application for Advisory Boards
(must be Clearwater resident)
Name
Winston R. Wordsworth
Home Address:
.
Office Address:
1000 S. ~yrtle Ave.
3035 Countryside Blv. Unit 27B
Clearwater
ZIP: 34E2l
Clearwater
21P: 34616
How Long a resident of the City of Clearwater?
Retail Store Owner
Occupation
443-f402
Telephone
28 years
Telephone 791-0900
E I The Rain Thatch, Inc.
mp oyer
Field of Education:
Accounting, Sales Training
Other Work Experience:
D.S.Air Force pilot InstructGr
Personnel Evaluation
Sales ~anaaement, Bankin~
. .
If retired, former occupation
Community Activites~
Other Interests:
,Soard Service (current and past)
None
Soard Preference:
Airnort Authority
Additional Comments:
Signed:
Date:
9-24-93
Please see attached list for Boards that (eQuire Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS
FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P,O. Sox 4748 Clearwater, FL. ~461S
RECEIVED
SEP 2 7 1993
CITY CLERK DEIIT.
APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET
* rec'v since pack went out
Agenda #_4 4
FOR COMMISSION MEETING October 7, 1993 APPOINTMENTS
BOARD: Municipal Code Enforcement Board MEMBERS: 7
TERM: 3 years CHAIRMAN: William Murray
APPOINTED BY: City Commission MEETING DATES: 2nd & 4th
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required Wednesdays, 3:00 p.m.
RESIDENCY REOUIREMENT: City of Clearwater APPTS. NEEDED: 3
SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: "Whenever possible DATE APPTS. TO BE MADE: 10/4/93
this Board shall include an architect, engineer, businessman,
general contractor, sub-contractor and a realtor."
THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW
REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW
APPOINTEE.
Name-Address-Phone
Date of Original
Appointment
Attendance
Record
Willingness
To Serve
1 . Vacant seat to finish term to 10/31/95 of Louise Bolton (Real Estate Agent) who was
removed
2. William S. Murray
1451 Stewart Blvd, 34624
0: 441-9961 H: 531-0667
(term expires 10/31/93) Realtor
1988
NA
NA
3. D. Wayne Wyatt
615 College Hill Dr., 34625
0: 538-7277 H: 797-6210
(term expires 10/31/93) Engineer
1989
past 1 2 meetings
present 10/excused 2
YES
Note: Mr. Wyatt is eligible for reappointment as he carne on the board to finish a term and
this is a board in which a member may serve two terms of their own also.
THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE
ABOVE VACANCIES:
Name-Address
Comments-Related Experience, Etc.
1. Ernie Cline
2074 Sunset Pt.Rd., 34625
Self-employed/building contractor
2. Dennis Henegar
314 Venetian Dr .,3461 5
Residential & Aluminum Contractor
:;\
3. Helen Kerwin
1173A Grnnada St.,34615
Retired Dept.Mgr. - Singer Co.
4. William Kirbas
34 Bohenia Circle N, 34630
Financial Planner
Continued
~
:''1-.' \;-,
. , '
. '.~
> , " . ~ ~~ '
- \ " ~
".
. 1 ' ':;: \
:, \'.; :'
"", '
,.,:1,
. ' :;"';N
Municipal Code Enforcement Board Volunteer List Cant.
5. James Madden
51 Island Way, 34630
Retired Deputy City Clerk
!
6. Robert Metz
1478 Maple Forest Dr .,34624
President of Public Corp.
7. Carl Rayborn
1161 Marine St., 34615
retired merchant marine
Pres. Edgewater Dr. Assoc.
8. H. Virginia Robinson
1005 Amble Ln., 34615
Nurse, Red Cross Volunteer
*9. Anthony Salmon
2430 Hazelwood Lane,34623
Retired - management consultant
10. Tamara Shannon
2826 Landover Dr. ,34621
Real Estate Agent
11 . Robert Theroux
55 Rogers St. ,f/206, 34616
Retired civil engineer
12. William Weller
223 S.Venus Ave.,34615
Administration representative w/Morton Plant
,';J
',I
:"'11
:",
::';11
-::
i
" ",J
I
,
I
I
I
"",.
...i:.\
11 ~ '~I "'I .. ...., ..... ....
J: " II '-"~ ; \. !:. . ~
.. ...a ~, .....ir. 11 ....1:...,
SEP 2 8 1933
Name .n.. ...5-r'rI.o,....tj
Home Addr,eis:
~~?76 H;t~~l~GGD l~
CL ~/L.. ZIP:3t-'-r?
Telephone ?I? ... --rq b .- 039 t
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Application for Advisory Boards
(must be Clearwater resident)
t. " , ~ A LI"<'"' <. ,.J
CITY CLER;( DI::.,T.
,:
Office Address:
--"~'-
.,-
~....,.
/
ZIP:
Telephone
How Long a resident of the City of Clearwater? I '~ ~ ~c;:;;
Occupation (l <f:... II {L~~ Employer
If retired, former occupation
I'!./"', 9.-. ~ . , r -...,-, ~ ./ ... ___...c:::._ .] (J
Community Activites: ''-1 C-/ r-:.7?c<- - l;-A.. ~ U E:::>-"'t I . 1-
L 0::) .A L-l-rl 6 ~ :v F- <:.. L-'~..."Vl L...-{---. -r-;:;... H / CJ ' ::s
Other Interests: 611 ~J ..-r:;r ~2..P~5f6417-ne:.rl
Other Work Experience: . ~I .
~ ~.A,.(AG~~'-'-- ~rl S 0<.::;:r: r I
~ - I
'-.. A ~I
..::::::>. A ~ S / "V ~ ~f2-:1
? II
Field of Education:
(0:; - (? U ~ I ~SS-
,Board Service (current and past)
Board Preference:
L' ~ ,...s.. rf' / ~ ~ --c:.. 'C-J loc-L ~
~ ....{ ~ } GA .fp l- ~ ))-e.
. \
,)
Additional Comments:
Signed:
~::o
Date:
~ !".s.( C73
Please see attached list for Boards that require Financial Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS
FORM TO: City Clerk's Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618
. ,
,
. ~
.
.
,
, J
. "
C I T Y 0 F
Interdepartment
Rt=::45Q..
lo/7/Cf3
CLEARWATER
correspondence Sheet
SUBJECT: Rental Agreement: 1171-1175 Cleveland street
TO: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., city Attorney
FROM: Earl Barrett, Real Estate Services Manager~
COPIES: Michael J. Wright, City Manager
William C. Baker, Director of Public Works
Brown rental file
DATE: October 6, 1993
Attached. is a re-write of the Rental Agreelllent for 1171-1175
Cleveland street. The "To Have And To Hold" clause has been
rewritten as requested (copy of your fax attached). section 2 has
been corrected: The reference to section 10 has been amended to
read section 11. The sentence Dr. and Mrs. Brown added and
initialed in section 11 has been incorporated into the body of the
section.
The only area where agreement is lacking is in the term of the
agreement. There was a verbal understanding between the Browns and
staff that the rental term was to be three months: August,
September and October, 1993, with the Browns having the option to
extend the term on a month-to-month basis for November and December
if they paid the monthly rental due by the first of each month,
subject, of course, to Commission approval.
Please advise on how you wish to proceed with this agreement.
noted, it does not fully reflect the understandings the Browns
regarding the term, and I expect they would want to amend
agreement in that regard.
As
had
.the
I spoke with Dr. Brown yesterday in Montana. He told llle that the
remodeling work is expected to be completed on their new location
in Dunedin by mid-November, and that he would like to retain
occupancy of the Cleveland building through that month. He also.
said that he has sent the rent due for October. It has not come to
me; and in a check with Barbara Weston this morning, she has not
received it either. Dr. Brown also said that he and Mrs. Brown
will be back in Clearwater within the next week or so.
. .'
i
..
RENTAL AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, ~ade this day of
and between the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a
hereinafter called "Lessor", and PAUL CHARLES
hereinafter called "Lessee";
, 1993, by
Florida Municipal corporation,
BROWN and BETTY JEAN BROWN,
WIT N E SSE T H:
That in consideration of the covenants herein contained on the part of the
Lessee to be kept and performed, the said Lessor does hereby rent to said Lessee
the following described property, including all improvements thereon, located in
Pinellas County, Florida, to wit:
Lot 19, GIBSON'S CLEARWATER HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, according to
the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 99,
of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which
Pinellas County was formerly a part,
a/k/a 1171-1175 Cleveland street, Clearwater, Florida
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same for the months of August through and including
December, 1993, with said Lessee paying rental at the rate of $1,000.00 per month,
of which $3,000.00 has been paid and received for August, September, and October,
1993; $1,000.00 shall be due and payable November 1, 1993; and $1,000.00 shall be
due and payable on December 1, 1993. The term of this Rental Agreement shall
expire on December 31, 1993, unless extended. This agreement may be extended from
month to month commencing January 1, 1994, by mutual agreement of the parties,
upon payment of the monthly rental of $1,000.00 to Lessor on or before the first
day of January, 1994, and on or before the first day of each month thereafter.
Either the Lessor or the Lessee shall give written notice of intent not to renew
this agreement on or before the fifteenth day of any month, and upon the giving
of such notice, this agreement shall be terminated as of the last day of the month
and Lessee shall remove all items of property which Lessee is entitled to remove
and shall peaceably surrender possession of the premises not later than the last
day of the nonth in which such notice was given. In the absence of such notice,
the Lessee shall pay to the Lessor the rental for the next month on or before the
first day of the month and shall be entitled to occupy the premises for that month
in accordance with the terms of this agreement.
In consideration of the premises the parties mutually covenant and agree as
follows:
1. This property shall be used as an art gallery and chiropractic office
for the Lessee and for meeting and work space and living quarters.
2. The Lessee shall have the right to enter upon said property and
maintain, use and occupy said building, and said property as may be necessary for
said purpose provided, however, that said Lessee shall, when exercising the
privileges herein granted, leave the premises in as clean and good a condition as
when entered upon with the exception of the items to be removed by Lessee and
outlined in Section 11 of this Agreement.
3. The Lessee agrees that it will, subject to Lessor's approval,' at its
sole expense make any interior repairs to the premises it deems necessary. The
Lessee shall be responsible for structural and exterior repairs to the premises.
Lessor's approval will not unreasonably be withheld.
4. The Lessee shall not use said premises for any purposes'other than as
outlined herein and will quit and deliver up said premises at the end of said term
in good condition and all improvements to the premises shall be the property of
the Lessor. Further, if the Lessee shall violate any of the covenants o~ terms
of this agreement, then said Lessor shall be entitled to immediately re-enter and
retake possession of the premises upon 15 days written notice to the Lessee, and
all rights of the Lessee shall immediately terminate.
5. The Lessee agrees that it will, prior to using the facilities, obtain
and keep in force during the term of this Agreement, a liability and property
damage insurance policy covering said facilities in the minimum limits of
$100,000/$300,000 and $10,000, which said policy shall name the city of Clearwater
as an additional insured. A certificate of said insurance shall be furnished to
the city Clerk of the city of Clearwater. In the event that the leased premises
are so extensively damaged by some casualty that it shall be determined by the
Lessor as being impractical or inequitable to repair and restore such leased
premises, then this lease shall thereupon terminate, unless the Lessee notifies
Lessor that it will restore such premises at its own expense.
6. The Lessee agrees and covenants to properly maintain the property in a
clean and satisfactory condition; and agrees to pay before becoming delinquent all
bills for electrical service and utility services and any real property taxes that
may be assessed and levied on the property or on the leasehold on a pro rata basis
through final day of occupancy under the terms of this agreement.
7. Any improvement which has been erected on the premises herein described
by the Lessee shall become the property of the city of Clearwater at the
expiration or termination of this Agreement or any extension hereof.
8. At the conclusion of the rental period, the Lessee may remove, at Lessee
expense, the following items from the property: light fixtures, wood trim from the
art gallery, interior doors, appliances, counter and cabinets.
9. This agreement shall not be assigned to another party.
10. Upon eKecution by Lessee and timely submittal of aforesaid rental
payments, this agreement shall be held unconditionally open for approval and
acceptance by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida.
11. There are no other representations or understandings, either written or
oral, between the parties other than those as expressed in writing herein, with
the exception of the terms and conditions as contained in the September, 1990 sale
contract between the parties; and there shall be no modifications of any terms and
conditions as contained herein prior to execution by Lessee and receipt by Lessor
of all rent timely paid as aforesaid. Thereafter, any modifications to this
agreement shall be only by mutual agreement of the parties and only as expressed
in writing and as properly executed by the parties hereto.
12. If each and every covenant and condition as contained herein that
requires compliance by September 10, 1993 is not fully complied with by midnight
of said date, this agreement shall expire and be void in all respects thereafter,
whereupon the premises are to be vacated and the Lessor shall have full authority
in law and in equity to take possession of the premises.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be executed the
day and year first above written.
Executed by Lessee (date):
WITNESSES:
By:
'Paul Charles Brown
Betty Jean Brown
Countersigned:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLO~IDA
Rita Garvey, Mayor-commissioner
By:
Michael J. Wright, City Manager
Approved as to form and correctness:
ATTEST:
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., city Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau, city Clerk
LEASE ^GREEt1ENT
TillS LEASE d th' 1~1",'A",-- d f C-t- 11 AD 1990 b tt
f , ma e . 1 s..:.:.1- ay 0 -'~)1J1...(~.t.lt) .~_ , .. ,e tween Ie
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORID^, () municipal cot"poration, hereinaft.er called "Lessor",
and PAUL CIIAHLES UIWWI~ ANU l3ETTY JEAN UIW\-IN, hereinafter called "Lessee";
WIT N E SSE T II:
That in consideration of the covenants herein contained on the part of the
Les see to be kept and performed, the sa idLes sor does hereby 1 ease to the sai d
Lessee the following described property, including all improvements thereon, located
in Pinellas County, Florida, to wit:
I
Lot Nineteen (19), Gibson's Clearwater Heights Subdivision,
according to ~lap or Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book Four
(4) Page Ninety-nine (99) Publ ic Records of Hillsborough ..~p.unty,
Florida of which Pinellas County was formerly a ~p'~~
TO IIAVE ANO TO HOLD the same for the '2.8 (lt$ from ~ 1-. 1990. sai d
Lessee paying therefore the rental of one dollar per year.
In consideration of the premises the parties mutually covenant and agree as
f 011 ow s :
1. This property shall be used as an art gallery and chiropractic office
for the Lessee and for meeting and work space and living quarters.
2. The Lessee s hall have the ri ght to enter upon sa i d property and
maintain, use and occupy said building, and s~id property as may be necessary for
said purpose provided, however, that said Lessee shall, when exercising the
privileges herein granted, leave the premises in as clean and good a condition as
\'/hen en tered upon wi th the excep t ion 0 f the items to be removed by 1 e s see and
outlined in Section 10 of this Agreement.
.
3. The Lessee agrees that it will, subject to Lessor's approval, at its
sole expense make any interior repairs to the premises it deems necessary. The
Lessee shall be responsibl e for structural and exterior repairs to the premi sese
Lessor's approval will not unreasonably be withheld.
4. The Lessee shall not use said premises for any purposes other than as
outlined herein and will quit and deliver up said premises at the end of said term in
a good condi tion and all improvements to the premi ses shall be the property of the
Lessor. Further, if the Lessee shall violate any of the covenants or terms of this
Lease, then said Lessor shall be entitled to immediately re-enter and retake
possession of the premises upon fifteen (15) days written notice to the Lessee, and
all rights of the Lessee shall immediately terminate.
..
5. The Lessee agrees that 1 t will, prior to using the facilities. obtain
and keep 1 n force durfng the term of thi s Agreement, a 1 iabil i ty and property damage
insurance policy covering said facilities in tile minimum limits of $100,000/$300,OUO
and $10,00U, which said policy shall nalOe the City of Clearwater as an additional
insured. ^ certificate of said insurance shall be furnisherl to the City Clerk of the
City of Clearwater. In the event that the leased premises are so extensively damaged
by some casualty that it shall be determi ned by the Lessor as being impractical or
inequitable to repair and restore such leased premises then this lease shall
thereupon terminate. unless the Lessee notifies Lessor that it will restore such
premises at its own expense.
6. The Lessee agrees and covenants to properly maintain the property in a
clean and satisfactory condition; and agrees to pay before becoming delinquent all
bills for electrical service and utility servic,es and any real property taxes that
may be assessed and levied on the property or on the leasehold interest.
7. Any improvement which has been erected on the premises herein
described by the Lessee shall become the property of the City of Clearwater at the
expiration or termination of this Agreement or any extension hereof.
8. At the conclusion of the lease period, the Seller may remove, at his
expense, from the property the following items: light fixtures, wood trim from the
art gallery, interior doors, appliances, counters and cabinets.
9. This Lease shall not be assigned to another party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOFt the parties have caused these presents to be executed the
day and year first above written.
Seal:
.
Ui t4~~ j )t4.j,Jif
By:
/JlZ!t~,
Paul Charles Brow
I&A,L'U~'1 ~ J{tr>--rL+rYL/'
. ~~'" ~,).tv--- ~~)!\,~-",,;-.r--
Be-t.~~ ~Brown
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
Ul -J/ 1iL
Ci ty Manager'
l3y:
Lt4A
correctness:
At tes t:
Approved as
O~\~:.^_ [' LLu-rSl...
Ci ty Cl erk
ten (10) days prior to closing shall notify the Seller in writing of any objections
fbtV
().l./1~M"i(:;:1
?J'
IV I-I.,p.. n-u!.
I} .... .."- l
, ",',' (/ ".:"""t,(.-
AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND S^LE OF REAL PROPERTY
L f q "--
THIS AGREE~lENT, made and entered into this 'J. day of ~Jo.;n.~!. 1990,
by and between PAUL CIIARLES I3ROWN ANU BETTY JEA~J 13ROWN, hereinafter referred to as
"Seller," and the CITY OF CLEAIH"^TER, FLURID^~ a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "Purchaser; II
WIT N E SSE T If :
That in consideration of the payments and covenants herein provided, and other
good and valuable considerations, Seller agrees to sell and Purchaser agrees to buy
the real property ("Property"), situate in Pinellas County, Florida, described as
fol10\'ls, to wit:
Lot nineteen (19), Gibson's Clean-later Heights Subdivision, according
to map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat l300k Four (4), page ninety-
nine (99), public records of Hillsborough County, Florida of which
Pinellas County was formerly a part.
Subject to any easements and restrictions of record.
1. Purchase Price. The total purchase price of the Property shall be in the
sum of three hundred fifty thousand ($350,000) which is payable in full at closing,
subject to adjustments and prorations.
2. Closing Date. The closing shall be \<lithin thirty (30) days following the
date of the full execution of this Agreement, unless extended by other provisions of
thi s Agreement or by the mutual consent of the parti eSt
3. Conveyance. Seller agrees to convey fee simple title to the Property to
Purchaser by statutory Warranty Deed, free and clear of all 1 iens and encumbrances,
except those set forth in th i s Agreemen t, if any, a nd those otherwi se accepted by
Purchaser. The Property shall be conveyed subject to applicable zoning requirements
.
of the City of Clearwater.
4. Title Insurance.
Pur'chaser agrees to purchase at its expense a title
insural'Jce pol icy from a Florida 1 icensed title insurer and to obtain with reasonable
diligence, but not less than twenty (20) days prior to closing, a commitment for
title insurance in the amount of the purchase price, which commitment shall show a
marketable, unencumbered, fee simple title to the Property in the Seller, subject
only to zoning, restrictions of record, taxes for 1990 and subsequent years, and
public utility easements; and to liens, encumbrances, exceptions or qualifications
set forth in this Agreement, and those which shall be dischat'ged by Seller at or
before closing. The Purchaser shall have a reasonable time after the delivery of
sa i d cOnlmi tment for the exami na ti on' thereof and wi thi n sa i d peri od but not 1 es s than
--
Il.tJ1 $ - 01.
~..,
"
'\
) t
I
to said title. If suCh notification is not given within the time specified herein,
then the title shall be conclusively deemed to be acceptable to the Purchaser. In
the event that the ti tle of the Seller is not good and marketabl e, the Seller shall
have a reasonable time thereafter, but not more than one hundred twenty (120) days
froln receipt of notice from the Purchaser, to make a diligent effort to perfect the
title; and if the defects are not cured within such time, the Purchaser may either
cancel this Agreement or waive the defects and accept the Property without deduction
on account of said defects.
5. No Brokers. Each party affirmatively represents to the other party that no
brokers have been involved in this transaction and that no broker is entitled to
payment of a real estate cOl1lnission because of this transaction.
6. Documents for Closing.
Seller shall furnish deed, mechanic's lien
a ffi davi t, and a ny correct i ve ins trumen ts tha t may be requ ired i n connection wi th
perfecting title, together with the closing statement.
7. Survey. Purchaser may obtain at its expense a survey. If the survey shows
any encroachment on the Property 0 r tha t i mprovemen ts intended to be located on the
Property encroach upon setback 1 i nes, ea sCl\1e n ts , 1 a nds 0 f others, or vi 01 a te any
restrictions, covenants or appl icable governmental regulations, the same shall be
treated as a title defect if brought to the attention of the Seller not less than
ten (10) days prior to closing.
8. Expenses. The Purchaser shall pay for the documentary stamps to be placed
on the Warranty Deed and the cost for recording same and shall pay the cost of
recording any instruments that may be required in connection with perfecting the
title.
9. Lease of Property.
The Purchaser agrees to lease sai d property to the
Seller for one dollar per year for a period of time not to extend beyond December
31, 1992, unless mutually extended by both parties.
10. Removal of Items. At the conclusion of the lease period, the Seller may
remove, at his expense, from the property the following items: light fixtures, wood
trim from the art gallery, interior doors, appliances, counters, cabinets and air
conditioning units.
11. Radon Gas Notification.
As required by Section 404.056(8),
F lor i d a S tat ute s, the Pur c has e r s h a 11 t a k e no tic e 0 f the f 0 11 O\y i n g :
RADON GAS: Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that, when
it has accumulated in a building in sufficient quantities, may present
heal th ri sks to persons \~ho are exposed to it over time. Level s of
radon that exceed federal and state guidelines have been found in
buildings in Florida. Additional information regarding radon and
radon testing may be obtained from your County public hea"lth unit.
, . .' '. " ' . . . '., .' {~ . .. .' .
,
~
,
12. Persons Dound; Agreement Not Assignable. This Agreement shall be binding
on the parties hereto and their respective personal representatives, heirs,
executors, admi ni strators, and successors. Nei the r thi s Agreement nor any ri ghts
hereunder shall be assignable. The City agrees not to lease said property to any
party other than Seller for the puq~ose of operating a chi ropractic office or art
~ 1<& ~)
gallery until December 31, 19~.~b ~
13. Agreement Not Recordable. I~either this Agreement nor any notice thereof
shall be recorded in public records of Pinellas County, but this Agreement shall be
deemed a record available for public inspection in the offices of the Seller
pursuant to the Public Records Law of Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day
and year first above written.
Countersigned:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
By:
-iZr-~
1, 7l -CJf{~-
Ron H. Rabun
City ~1anager
R,ta Garvey
Mayor-Comnissioner
Approved as to form
and correctness:
A ttes t:
afL;_~ -1~~-
( Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
WITNESSES:
SELLER
. 4~~ / ~JJi(
,
/) ~ ~ k /J
~';;'U4~rc.,
aul Charles Brown
.
dJ~~~ df~~
~~~'v--~~'~
Be-tt. {l Brown
I
i:
....
.'t' ;.:<
.p "... -
. ~' .~.. .',
, '
.(
~ i
.'. "
" J'
"
l' ,
I....
..; 'I' ;
" .!
- '.,
. P.'
....-." . :~. \;' . \ . ~.
.;....1.
> . ;". ,j'-:;'l~ 4; .:-::~:. ".i: ,
;..'.'j
Item#~S b.
!
i
I
Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Meeting Date: 10/07/93
!
SUBJECT:
,
I
.,
Town Meeting at Martin Luther King Center
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION:
Set Town Meeting date for Martin Luther King Center
o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
BACKGROUND:
The Town Meetings schedule for 1993/94 was presented to the
Commission on October 4 and approved with the exception of the meeting
held at the Martin Luther King Center.
Following are the remaining options for scheduling that meeting in
the last two weeks of October at 7:30 p.m.:
Monday
Thursday
25th
28th
Friday
Friday
22nd
29th
In speaking with Muhammad Abdur-Rahim, representing the N. Greenwood
As'sociation, Monday or Thursday is preferred, if possible.
Revi ewed by: Origina'ing Dep" ~ Costs: $ NA Commission Action:
Legal N/A City Clerk Total 0 Approved
Budget N/A 0 Approved w/conditions
Purchasing N/A $
Risk Mgmt. ---!!LA Current Fiscal Yr. 0 Denied
CIS N/A User Dept: 0 Continued to:
ACM N/A FW'lding Source:
Other 0 Capital Imp.
Advertised: 0 Operating Attachments:
Date: 0 Other
Paper:
~ Not Required X None
~~'J ~' . 4-- Affected Parties
0 Notified Appropriation Code:
'/l{Q NA
, ~ Not Requi red
Ci ty Manager
10/"'/93
lfC,
ORDINANCE NO. 5478-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, PROHIBITING THE
PRACTICE OF REQUESTING PAYMENT IN EXCHANGE FOR "WATCHING" A PARKED
MOTOR VEHICLE: WITH CERTAIN EXCEPtIONS; CREATING SECTION 21.15, CODE
OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds it necessary to protect the public
health and safety to prohibit the practice of requesting payment for the
"service" of "watc.hing" or "guardingll parked motor vehicles where no such service
is actually provided; and
WHEREAS, such requests are intimidation tactics intended to extort money
from persons wishing to avoid the implied threat of damage to their motor
vehicles if payment is not made, and such tactics serve no legitimate purpose;
now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section 21.15, Code of Ordinances, is created to read:
Sec. 21.15. Requesting Payment in Exchange for "Watchingll Parked Motor
Vehicle Prohibited; Exceptions.
It is un 1 awfu 1 for any person to reques t payment in exchange for the
service of providing security for, guarding, or otherwise watching any motor
vehicle owned by, or in the lawful possession of, another person unless:
(1) The requesting person is a properly licensed security officer who is
in compliance with all applicable requirements of Chapter 493, Florida Statutes,
relating to private security services; or
(2) The requesting person is the owner or employee of a parking facility
at which the vehicle is parked or to be parked when the request is made, and the 'I"
service is incidental to an agreement to permit the motor vehicle to be parked
upon or within such parking facility.
.' Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING
AND ADOPTED
Attest:
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and correctness:
"
i
,
Cynthia E, Goudeau
City Clerk
.'~
',t. ~y~.w!i.t~'~"~':t\. .; .l< .tOj'll" . ~';"""':l\ '"
.: .\-
; l~ ,~: '. ,,' I"
" .
" "
,..'
" "
"
,. -..., ". . "
. :,~".' "
., f' - ,I.
" h\ ... ~;"....\< :>
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet
TO:
M. A. Galbraith, Ir., City Attorney
Sid Klein, Chief of Police ~L
FROl"l:
COPIES: Deputy' Chief Eastridge
SUBJECT: Watching Parked Vehicles Ordinance
DATE: September 15, 1993
Members of my staff and I have reviewed your proposed Watching Parked Vehicles Ordinance.
At the present timc, we do not have a signilicant problem with these activities, however, it is
our opinion that the ordinance might bc effective in helping us deal with occasional problems
of tllis nature in the area or Jack Russell Stadium during spring training.
Accordingly. it would be our position that this ordinance would be helpful on an occasional
basis. Additionally, there are no changes or improvements to the ordinance that we would
recommend.
Please contact me direct if YOll have any other questions or concerns regarding this matter.
SRK/nc
CLI~ARW ATER It(U.ICE f)1~I.ARTMl~N"I"7S MISSION ~'TA'1'EM(~NT
COllsistently prol'ide impartial, profcssiOlwl, CO/II III Il1Iity-oriCllte(1 police services delivered by courteous,
competent, dediclltetl employees reslIlting ill (III elllwllcell qlllllity of life for ollr citizells am/tile euric//lllellt of
ollr Milled elJ/ploYI!es.
1
;j
'!.)
~ '\
'ft
','
'.'.,
. oj"
, "
',I
. ,
,"I
:',:"f
'I
-,j
,'"j
. ,i
,'I
, ,,'!
,:;1
, ~"l
',j
, ,
..,,"1
',I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 5452-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
VACATING THE la-FOOT EAST/WEST ALLEY LYING BETWEEN
ORANGE AVENUE AND BAY AVENUE, SOUTH OF BLOCK 12, TURNERS
SUBDIVLSION NO.3, AND NORTH OF BLOCK 3, STARR &
SAVERY'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, SUBJECT TO A UTILITY
EASEMENT WHICH IS RETAINED OVER THE FULL WIDTH THEREOF;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
1/'7
IO/?/?3
WHEREAS, the Episcopal Church of the Ascension, owner of real property
adjoining the al ley described herein, has requested that the City vacate the
alley; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the alley is not necessary for
municipal use and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the
general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore,
BE IT OHDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
...
Section 1. The following:
The IO-foot alley lying South of Block 12, Turners Subdivision No,
3, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page
53, of the public records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which
Pine II a s was once a part, and lyi ng North of Block 3, Starr &
Savery's Addition to Clearwater, according to the plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 97, of the public records of
Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas was once a part,
is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater quitclaims and
releases all of its right, title and interest thereto, except that the City of
Clearwater hereby retains a utility easement over the described property for the
installation and maintenance of any and all public utilities thereon.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public ..
records of Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
. i
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Approved as to form and
~~
M. A. Ga braJ'Lh,/Jr.
City AttorneY---'"
Attest:
cynthia E, Goudeau
City Clerk
.
N
-:dJ:!I
SCALE' N.T.S.
PEACH
ST.
J l
.
W
>
<X
--
w
(!)
z
<r
n:
o
MAP
OF I
TURNER
ST.
TU NER
4
SU BOI IS I N
3
2
No.
. . . . "'r,Tnt=;,IT.....n-r.-nJ.............................................
~ ;li ~ ~~11 ~ ;1;; ;~~ ~ ~;;~ ~ ~li; ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ !!~ ~ ;!; ~ ~;; ~ ~;; ~;~; ~;;~;; ;~!~ ~ ;!;;; ~~~~;;i;; ~~~ ~; ;i~~ ~~! ;:i;; ~H; E ig; !;~; ~g; E;;
5T AR R
HI - 53
>-
CI)
4.
o
3
a
2 I
R8qtJflsf d Vt1ca lion
by 'PI/cant
4 :3
AOOI TION
Vacated 8024 - 2165
Retained as Dr. a Ufil. Esm't.
.
LLJ
>
<t
--
AV RY'S
>-
<X
([)
TO
CLEARWAT R
NOTE: This Is not a SURVEY
I
i
I
I
I
PINE
ST,
Vac. ReQuest 93-08
Section 16.29-15
"Episcopal ChurCh of
the Ascension II
Date: 7/ I 9/93
Drown by; O. D. M.
Revised 9/02/93
Revised 9/23/93
ORDINANCE NO. 5487-93
L-f'b
1()1'7/93
,. c
. t,
" ,,','
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE 5386-93, WHICH PROPOSES A CITY
CHARTER AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH A DEPARTMENT TO BE KNOWN
AS THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE, AND WHICH PROVIDES FOR
A SPECIAL ELECTION TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSED CITY CHARTER
AMENDMENT TO THE VOTERS; CHANG I NG THE DATE OF THE
SPEC1AL ELECTION FROM NOVEMBER 2, 1993, TO JANUARY 11,
1994; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section 2 of Ordinance 5386-93 ;s amended to read:
Sect ion 2. The amendment proposed by th; S ordi nance sha II
take effect upon the approval thereof by the voters of the City. A
special election for such purpose shall be conducted on Januarv II.
1994, ~Gvembcr 2, 1993, and the proposed amendment shall be deemed,
approved upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the voters of
the City voting at that time upon the following ballot question:
, I
I
;'1
*
*
*
*
*
Section 2.
This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING
AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
;!
;
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Approved as to form and correctness:
I
i
'Ii
"
CODING: Words &trlckGR are deletions; words underlined are additions. Asterisks (* * *)
denote the location of text omitted from this ordinance but not affected by this ordinance.
i
, I
. # '. . " I. "',' ~, . " '. . ,
RESOLUTION NO. 93-60
LI'1
/o/'7/cr3
A RESOLUTION OF TilE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ASSESSING THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY THE COSTS OF HAVING
MOWED OR CLEARED THE OWNERS' LOTS.
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City Commission of the City of
Clearwater that, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens and residents of the City, real property within the City
should be cleared of weeds, rubbish, debris and other noxious material; and
WHEREAS, notice pursuant to former Section 20,38, Code of Ordinances, now
Section 20.38, Code of Ordinances, was provided to the owner of each of the lots
listed in Exhibit A, and the notice required each property owner to cause the
violation to be remedied or to file a notice of appeal within 10 days after the
date the property was posted; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have fa i 1 ed to take remed i a 1 act i on wi th i n the
time provided and have failed to file a notice of appeal within the time allowed,
or appealed the notice of violation but failed to take remedial action within the!
time provided by the Code Enforcement Board, and it became necessary for the City
to take remedial action; and
WliEREAS, the owner of each lot listed on Exhibit A has been provided with
a notice and opportunity within which to pay the costs and administrative charges
set forth on Exhibit A, but no payments have been received;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
TlfE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Commission finds the preamble hereof to be true and
correct.
Section 2. The City Commission hereby assesses a lien upon each parcel of
real property listed on Exhibit A for the actual costs of mowing or clearing,
plus administrative costs, as shown on Exhibit A.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to prepare a notice of lien
against each property listed on Exllibit A and to record the same in the public
records of Pinellas County, Florida,
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
, 1993.
Attest:
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
.~""."-'~
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
'j
'!t.)-.'",.
; ".
'r ~ <::. J :' '". ~:t: ~',i "" ,. ,
EXHIBIT A (SEPTEMBER)
PROPERTY OWNER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
COST
ADMIN.
CHARGE
TOTAL
Bidwell's Oakwood Lt 32
$
85.67 $ 200.00 $ 285.67
R & B Partners
Robert/Ruth smith
Boulevard Hts Blk H Lt 2
253.35
Brookhill unit 8 Blk J
Lot 21
Eleanor R. Stouffer
116.61
Parkwood Assoc pinellas Homestead Oaks, Lot 14
50.00
Parkwood Assoc pinellas Homestead Oaks, Lot 35
104.27
Parkwood Assoc Pinellas
Homestead Oaks, Lot 37
50.00
Lakeview Hts Blk H Lot 1
steeley/Oran Moore
60.89
Larry/Cynthia Downs
Palm Terrace Unit 2 Lt 33
82.81
Richard L. Garnish
pine Brook U-2 Blk C Lt 13 389.64
James/Nancy Erskine
Plaza Park Blk D Lot 6 109.56
Howard E. Fest
Plaza Park Blk H N45'Lts 5-6 66.22
John C. Garner
J.H.Rouse Blk 2 S33'MOL Lt 13 93.0B
George/Jane O'Neill
See 08/29/16 M&B 22{04 648.70
See 19-29-16 M&B 44{05 738.36
Charles/No~l LeCher
Ruby L. Clayton
See 22-29-15 M&B 32/13 745.39
Michael/Joan Pasko
Skycrest U-9 Blk f Lt 6 & 131.69
1/2 alley on West
Gordon/Jani~e
VanValkenburg
Sunset Point 1st Addition
Blk E, Lot 34
432.08
.(
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
453.35
316.61
304.27
250.00
260.89
."1
. J
I
I
'.i
./
,1
.,
282.81
589.64
309.56
266.22
293.08
848.70
938.36 .
945.39
331.69
. ',',
632.08
";, ~. . " i '. . '
.;", :. ::'.' "".
...\' ',"
"
~1" '
/;;
. ..
.,
" ';"!'~i.
v
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet
50~.
FROM:
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney
Robert J. Maran, Civil Engineer III U<~ W\
William C. Baker, Director of Public Works
TO:
COPIES:
SUBJECT:
Stag Run Boulevard and Florida Power R.O.W.
DATE:
August 26, 1993
Please prepare an agenda memo for City Commission to approve the 2nd amendment to the
easement agreement with Florida Power. This amendment will allow the City of Clearwater to own
and maintain a 15" R.C.P. storm line in the Florida Power r.o.w.
Should you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 6030.
RJM:jlp
Itagrun.rJm
RECEI'~'EO
I\UG 27 1993
CITY ATTor~NEY
, ','.,
"', \:' ~" . .
, ,)J
CL-63 7/12/93
SECOND AMENDMENT OF
EASEMENT A<JREEMENr
ORIGlf{i\.L
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT, Made and entered into on this 6th day offtLgust , 1993, by and
between FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION ("GRANTOR"), and CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, and
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ("GRANTEES");
WIIN.B~~EIH:
WHEREAS, by instrument dated April 28, 1981, recorded May 1, 1981, in O.R. Book 5184 at P~ge 867 as
Clerk's Instrument No. 81067684, Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida, said GRANTOR and GRANTEES did enter
into an Easement Agreement permitting GRANTEES to occupy and utilize a portion of GRANTOR's electric transmission
corridor for a roadway crossing (Stag Run Boulevard) with an 8-inch underground water main and a IO-inch underground
sanitary sewer main beneath the roadway within n 60-foot wille Easement Area as more particularly described in said
Instrument No. 81067684, and by First Amendment of Easement Agreement dated May 25, 1993, recorded June 18, 1993,
in O. R. Book 8310, Page 3, as Clerk's Instrument No. 93-174933, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; permitting
GRANTEES to widen the Easement Area into two dead-end cul-de-sacs; and
WHEREAS, said GRANTEES now desire that said Instrument No. 81067684 and Instrument No. 93-174933
be amended to install n IS" reinforced concrete underground pipe, and GRANTOR is willing for said Instrument so to be
amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, For and in further consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and
valuable considerations in hand paid by GRANTEES to GRANTOR, the r~eipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
GRANTOR and GRANTEES do hereby mutually agree to amend said Instrument No. 81067684 and Instrument No. 93-
174933, as follows:
That the legal description of the Easement Area as recited in said Instrument No. 81067684 and Instrument No.
93-174933 an~ amended by deleting paragraph three and inserting in lieu thereof the following new language, to-wit:
The location of a 15M reinforced concrete undc:rground pipe is
generally as uepicted on the print attached to this Second
Amenument of Easement Agreement documen~ as EXHIBIT .. A "
and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
Except as hereinabove amended, the aforesaid Easement Agreement dated April 28, 1981, Clerk's
Instrument No. 81067684 and First Amendment of Easement Agreement dated May 25, 1993, Clerk's Instrument No. 93-
174933, shall, in all other respects, remain in full force and effect upon the original terms and conditions therein expressed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the aforesaill GRANTOR and GRANTEES have caused this Second
Amendment to be signed in their respective names by their proper executive ofticers or officials thereunto duly authorized
and their respective officjal seals to' be hereunto affixed and attested all as of the day, month and year first above written.
I
. ,
!
i
i
:j
I
: . \J
I
i
I
'.I
,I
.,
1
-----~.
r _ ~.
VO'.'! l; ;,. .
,4 ~.. I I l ~ "\
. ': ~.' t .
(,)" ., 1 ' .: ')"
~ ,l ;./.',. t ,. ," .
,', ~ ~ it J I,/~' .)
. l.,;...~~~}.-
\ '
, ~.! '.1 _ ._., ..
, ,.) . ." ._-
'......-.. ./
.",- ._.._."r
FLORIDA. POWER CORPORATION
(as GRANTOR)
"
WITNESSES:
Attest:
rf.ij'i'WJ:
.... .61......,.,.. .~. J
"
, I
-.l
."
,
, '
"
, . ,~ - :. ,: '",
\ (..'.'
'f" .,.>
.
WITNESSES:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
(as GRANTEE)
By
City Manager
ArrEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to fonn
and correctness:
Countersigned:
City Attorney
Mayor-Commissioner
WITNESSES:
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
(as GRANTEE)
Chairman
A TIEST:
. '. ' :",: d:'.~~\:~
''',':';"fij'
-'. .: ," :~~r}\
;:':,':,',:,:\
- .', ~.?
"'1
Deputy Clerk
'" '" "'... ate '" ... '"
"....,
STATE OF FLORIDA
)
)ss.
)
" ',"I
'.' ,"'..,
'.J,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
l!L
The foregoin~ Second AnlendlOent was acknowledged before me this t day of fh.z<a l4\Lf , 1993, by ,
,,I}),,'I.,',o e. )JelVi.y as Senior Vice President and as Assistant
Secretary,' respectively, of FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation as
GRANTOR, who are personally knowl} to me and who did not take an oath.
olh~j(. ~.a,t'~
Name:
Notary Public
Serial Number:
My Commission Expires: .
.. :....:~ ..-..
~~ V,1N ::t: aoBART
M~ "";'IIlMIs:.~~~ , c:c ~"4S55
El<PtFlES: D'e~nber &, 1.1)&
80ndId TIIIU NDIluy PublIc ~
r.~~~~J
tl~
Page 2 of 3 Pages
. .?::.
"I.,
'_ i ~
',; '. 1
,
" f' ,
, ,'~ . ~t , ':
,. ~ ,- "....
. '
1:.
" f
.. ~', .'
'."' , I.
.
,....':..".-i,."
>>Ie >fc '" '" + ate ate ate
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
)
)S5.
)
The foregoing Second Amendment was acknowledged before me this day of , 1993, by
as City Manager and by as City Clerk,
respectively, of CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a Florida municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation as
GRANTEE, who are personally known to me and who did not take an oath.
(SEAL)
Name:
Notary Public
Serial Number:
My Commission Expires:
* ++ * tic ate >>Ie '"
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
)
)S5.
)
The foregoing Second Amendment was acknowledged before me this day of , 1993, by
as Chairman and by as Clerk,
respectively, of BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Florida political
subdivision, on behalf of the COUNTY as GRANTEE, who are personally known to me and who did not take an oath.
(SEAL)
INITIAL
[1~:TfAJ
Name:
Notary Public
Serial Number:
My Commission Expires:
Page 3 of 3 Pages
'j'
- ..: ,"';X:'~ '-':(.f;'
CNi'flAL]
\~
~~ .J
r- . l
ui .1
~8i
.) If \
j:J:' "~'
['4 ~ l
~ .1.~ ~
.1 ~t ~
'9-~~ "
, J..'\J
~I )
~~~Q
1 .~ r- &l
~\......
J
11
\
..L ~r- Q.;. lJ
-
-
~""'
~~
... W <(;:
~~ t- t- O.
2 ex: - 1'1"
~; (/) '- C\J
< ~'-
:E t-
I U I
..J W J
, c2: ..,
...
t. ~ 3: 0
~~ ex: -.;
a..
JJ~
)
J\.\.~
.- -,- _.- - - --. -'- -""-- --- ~~
j ~
~ ~~
~? ~~
.,./ uJ<:lO 2:1
,It-lit ~f-
r~~ ..!II~,
~ hI.!) ~~
~ F<uJ Il~ ~
~~F l!,:lj.
1~l~ ~~
~-i,~~a~ ..
~itlc{ .J~.
> l\I~~~i{
j Z~ ,.f:t.l
<1~q~~-.r ""
_ J ~"'~13 ~
~ ^-I!! Jl
.'I .' ~,
~ 4 <{ ~9 ~
t-~I."l"' Q
l'ijt.l:!:ii~ '
-:0,,,]4- ~
~rrk}l/~~ I
,.-
r; c. , "
.~ t
~1l1 .11;;
~~ ~b
' .
y .. ...
~d .' ~', ,~
,~ n. r~' iit
J.J~~ j' :l~
~~., , r J
~~ . ...
;," : ~ ~~ ~ -
~li . ;(~ ~
."l: t~, u:
J '.
/// 'f ~
'.
uJ ~,~
:~n ''; ~.
~~u N
..... ..
'9 ~
; :-- ~
"r II-
\':i ._
...;> ~ /"
..~. ti
':~L;Z.
,~.. " u.
> > -;, - r
1 ~ ,~
t t )- . '. \"
, :.~. J
'N : .. j
., ~ :il0
- .} I) tj
;,-...
-....
1\
II
-""-
>
t
~:.
dtJ
t-
~
a:
w
a.
t!) (/)
z
C5 u
:5 <t
0) t1
t!) W
z c
:> .
m ...I
o :::J
w U
a:
u.. C
o CI: 7:
en ~
~ >~.
o w.
o' ...I ::
M ::>:3
~ o~'
~ CO
~ Z
o :::J
w CI:
!-'
o ~
::> <t
g: t-
el> (/)
Z
o
U
w
0)
I-
en
:::>
~
. ';
~l?J
"
I
,
-4
..'V\I:lI
Exhibit "A"
.. .;-
, ;
50 ~.
'. ~ i. '
EASEMENT
FOR AND rN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) cash in hand
paid to them the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the
benefits to be devised therefrom,
"
.*, .~.
'.l.~
Jaok Heitzman and patricia K. Freeman, his daughter
1291 Everglades Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 34624
does hereby grant and convey to the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, an easement
over, under and across the following described land, lying and being situate
in the County of Pinellas, state of Florida, to-wit:
A 6.0 foot Drainage & utility Easement lying 3.0 feet either side of the
following described centerline:
Begin at the Northeast corner of Lot 15, Block "E", Tropic Hills unit 2, as
recorded in Plat Book 58, Page 5 of the publio reoords of Pinellas County,
Florida, for the point of beginning of said 6.0 Drainage & utility Easement;
run thence S 00051'06" W, along the centerline of said 6.0 easement, 12.0
feet; thence run S 13059'17" E along said centerline of easement, 70.32 feet
to the South line of tract "A" of said Tropic Hills Unit 2, and end of said
easement. said point lies N 89013'1211 W, 12.96 feet from the Southeast
corner of said tract "A".
This easement is for drainage, utility installation and maintenance.
j
The CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, shall have the right to enter upon
the above described premises and to construct, install and maintain thereon
any drainage and utility facilities and to inspect and alter such drainage
and utility from time to tine.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set
seal this ,5 C'J day of j1~~f; ~A-~ , 19
~igned, sealed and. delive5~~'D A. SAMS, NOTAFlY fJVeLle
l.n the presence of. SlA TE OF FLORIDA
\tY COMMISSION EXPIRES 7/10 95
~.
their
93.
hand(s) and
1It- -
-'i
34624
t.\\~(.k 't~fVl P
witness. Printed Signature
~~o~~
Patricia K. rr..~an, hi. daugbter
1291 Everglade. Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 34624
!
~ \1
STATE OF -tlur-Idr.t
COUNTY OF 'PI J.}(i.-llqs
TheJL)foregping instrument was acknowledged before me this 30 day.
of r'(;tcz.c-<-s-r , 19 93 by Jack Heitzman and Pa~ricia K. Freema.D..r-bi1!
daughter findi vidual's name), who is personally known to me or who has
produced 1<,.....N.7'-^-"rV (name type of identi cation shown*) as.
identification and who (check one) ( )did (~did not e an oath.
DAVID A. SAMS, NOTARY PUBLIC
STA TE OF FLORIDA
~AY COMMISSION EXPIRES 7/7()195
t 1ng acknowledgment
\"::Jf\U\'\::) A. SAYV\s
Type/print/stamp name of acknowledger
Title or rank, and Serial No., if any
N:\PW\DATA\WORD\EASMT.DPM
.-
'\l" -,.
~
\t, ~
~ ~
\l: ~
~
\-ij 4,
f:j t~
t ~
~ \
~ I~
~
\\J '~
).
\1<
v
<>;' ,
. '1 ~
" ,:;'P'
',:','; ,:"
'SEC.~ , TWP.~S,RGE.!!-E.
J
J
I
;j
'I
. : :.1
.SKETC~ OF LEGAL"
,
..~
..
/"
;; 8P. I)'
~po,OO' ,
~
/5 ~
U,
I
(:;)
\l I
. I . ',. ~
'I
" -,
> :;,'
-\
. "
r, v/ t!) 0 )>
/1 .:
/.;'/, ~, '
~
~
~
;~,~,
"
o
)
.
t\.
~" ,Iv' Of r"'" ,-If' ~~I: ~
..
Q
~
't
,
"
..
~
~
,~
.
q
~
!
,,{
1'4, 0/
N' &9(}
/'J~ /Z." ..,.",.
.
./) ~ IV iF
DESCRIPTION FOR A PROPOSED 6~O 'FT.
..., .
OR1'ilNAOg,' ~: Ul'ILITY- EASEMENT'
BEGIN'AT -rHE NORTHEAST'CORNER'OF LOT, IS ~ BLOCK '.B- ,
''1'ROPIC,''UILLS' UNIT' 2 , AS RECORDEO:-IN PLAT BOOK' 58 PAGE S OF
,\ THZ"PUBJiIC"RBCOROS"OV"PINELtAS' COU~TY , FOORIDA , .J'OR'. "l~E
POINT OF B~GINNING or SAID 6.0 F'1'~'~~INJtG~: ~::utrtrr,ny-'gJl.-SEMENT', J RUN
THENCE '~"O 51'06.' 'W , ALONG 'THE' CEliTER&INE:'or: SAID 6.0 Frr..
BASBMEN'! , 12~OO 1"'1'.' , ,'fRENCZ' RUN:S 13 59'17."! , ALONG
, SAID"C~N'l'!RLINB; 0I""EASBMBNT',," 70'~32 FT. ''1'O''''1'HB' SOUTH' ~INE OP
TRACT""A" ' " OF 'SAXP''rROI'IC'' H:tLL~rONIT' 2', AND ENO"OF SAtt)
EASEMENT. 'SAID POIl~'l', LIES' N 89 13t12"W , '12.96' FT.. FROM THE
SOUTHEAS'l' " CORNER OF SAID ~RACT "A".
. '.;
Bll
,
JULY"" 1993.
~; .,..".~ I~.
, . ", '
.. ..f . Ii ,
f .. ,.. "
P . L . S .12865:'
., : ~ . '
p' ... '-.
I.'., .....
,/",.. ...
.,' J . >
,';)
ALLIED URVEYING
2124 SUNtl'lDALE' BLVD.
'~LEARWATER , FLORIDA
'34625
,. ,.. , .
. " .
, ,
NOTEI THIS"I, NOT 'A BOUNDARY 'SURVEY
;1
"A
" '~. , ,... .
AFFIDAVIT OF NO LIENS
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority,
Heitzman and Patricia K. Freeman, his dauqhter
depose and say:
personally appeared Jack
who, being first duly sworn,
1. That they are the owner(s) of legal and equitable title to the
fOllowing described property in Pinellas county, Florida, to ~it:
A 6.0 foot Drainage & utility Easement lying 3.0 feet either si~e of the
following described centerline:
Begin at the Northeast corner of Lot 15, Block "E", Tropio Hills unit 2, as
reoorded in Plat Book 58, Page 5 of the public records of pinellas County,
Florida, for the point of beginning of said 6.0 Drainage & utility Easement;
run thence S 00051'06" W, along the centerline of said 6.0 easement, 12.0
feet; thence run S 13059'17" E along said centerline of easement, 70.32 feet
to the South line of tract "A" of said Tropic Hills Unit 2, and end of said
easement. Said point lies N 89013 '12" W, 12.96 feet from the Southeast
corner of said tract "A".
2. That said property is now in the possession of the record owner.
3. That there has been no labor performed or materials furnished on
said property for which there are unpaid bills for labor or materials against
said property, except (if none insert "none"):
4. That there are no liens or encumbrances of any nature affecting the
title of the property hereinabove described, except (if none insert "none"):
James L. Peterson and Sharon A. Peterson in favor of First Federal Savings
and Loan Association dated May 3, 1973, filed May 7, 1973, in O.R. Book 4026,
Page 876, public records of Pinellas county, Florida.
5. That it is hereby warranted that no notice has been received for
any public hearing regarding assessments for improvements by any government,
and it is hereby warranted that there are no unpaid assessments against the
above property for improvements thereto by any government, whether or not
said assessments appear of record.
j
1
'\
I
,I
6. That there is no outstanding sewer service charges or assessments
payable to any government.
I
I
j
" - ~,
,. '"
7. That the representations embraced herein are for the purpose of
inducing CITY OF CLEARWATER, its agents, successors and assigns to rely
thereon.
~
. . ~
iiFIliE S
66.,/,/ t(~ /f. ell /IJA",v ~/}
Witn ss Printed Signature
~{v. K'/I.l,A~
Witness Printed Sig ature
34624
~~~.\t 00 )aQA. I
I -
Patricia K. Freeman, his daugh~er
1291 Everglades Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 34624
Sworn to and subscribed to before me this
A.D., 1993 .
'3G> day of ;4u~~~ J-
. ,
DAVID A. SAMS. NOTARY PUBLIC
. STA TE OF FLORIDA
liY COMMISSION EXPIRES V70/95
-....,__ I
Signature of person ta ng acknowledgment
-"'~L\Lll D fi. S tjMS
~~int/stamp name of acknowledger
N:\PW\OATA\WORO\EASMT.DDM
Title or rank, and. Serial No., if any
,,' .., ....
"
.:' :"'.
.;
I
I
I
'J
'(
!
I
!
j
\ '\1'---
l~
~ 'Q
~ a
~ cS
't ~
V\
\-tJ 'll
C .
~
't ~
~ ...
~ "
1\
~
\\J ,
c,)
}.
\1'<
-.-..
j. .
"
. ;
<', 1
'.j'
,.:' ,-
-: '...
~SKETC~ OF LEGAL"
!~
;.? ~,'
I)'
'SEC.-!! , TWP.!!-S,RGE.!!-E.
,
...~
...
.\
/5
I.
'... . ,~_... .
I..;'/, " ·
~
l(
~
,'IfI'd ~.. dO '
.J.""~'
~
u
)
.
~
"" .J'V- T,"'" ..If'#'~,~t:
"-
()
1'4
tt:
~
,
"
\l,
<:)
'-,)
~.
~
~
~
.
~
~
'I
,14,0,'
, I
If Q'
I.,J/). , "',
" ./.
. P /Z e' N T'VI' C) tJ .P
/Y' 8~'
". .J' / Z. H ..,."
.
P /Z IV F
DESCRIPTION FOR A PROPOSED 6~O 'FT.
J:)R1\:LNAOg,' :&: U1'ILITY- EASEMENT'
BEGIN"AT THE NORTHEAST' CORNER 'OF LOT, lS , BLOCK '''B'' ,
, 'TROPIC:'HILLS'UNIT' 2 , AS RECORDEO"IN PLAT BOOK' 58 PAGE 5 OF
" 'l'HE"PUBLIC"RBCORDS"OP" PINELUS"COUNTY , "FOORIDA , .roOR'. "I'HE
POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID 6.0 F'1'. 'IDAA'lN'~~:E: ~" :mrn.n~"~A'S'EMENT' , ,
THENCS'S'OoSl'06-"W , ALONG '1'HB' CENTERbINB:'OF: SAID 6.0 p~~
EASEMENT , 12~OO FT.', ,THENCE' RUN'S 13 S9 .17....E " ALONG
, SAID" C~N'1'ERLINB' or" EASEMENT' ,.. 70'.32 FT.' TO"'TUB' SOUTH' I,;INE or
. TRACT"-A.' ,'or'SAle"'1'ROPIC"HILL~"UNIT' 2', AND' END"OF sA1'O
'EASEMENT. '8AIOPOXNT~'LIES' N 89 13'12" W ,12.96' FT., FROH TilE
SOUTHUST"CORNER 'OF SAID ~RACT MAN.
~.
I
, I
I.
1 ~
. ,
,. '..>.
. ,
. ,
JULY "7", '1993.
, ,.
..
". "
it.
I, t,....
.,'
r'.'
i
I
I, '\ ..
RUN I. I';
;
.. ",
;
I
B~I
..: t#....f~ ~I.
I.' ',.
. " ", I
f .~..,.,.,. #
P.L.S. f ~~,~S/ ~ ~ '.
... . - ."'., i,
, L '., roj 'f ,
· "1.:-" '" J :,. ;,'
.~ I' '. . . .,t'
'~r ;. ....
. ALLIED URVEVING
2124 SUNNYDALE' BLVD.
'CLEARWATER , FLORIDA
'34625
I ....., '.' ."
NOTE. .THIS "I~ N,OT 'A' BOUNDARY' SURVEY ,
""':""-..
'.".'
, "\
50C~
10/'1 h3
M E M 0 RAN 0 U M
TO:
FROM:
The Ilonorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
~1. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney k
Computers
RE:
DATE:
August 26, 1993
As a follow-up to lilY August 20 memorandum, let me share with you some information
regarding legal research resources available on compact discs.
1. He can obtain the Florida Statutes (only) for $89.00 from a
C 1 earwa tel" vendor, In terac t i on co- nOM and Opt i ca 1 D; sc Storage. The current
producl includes the 1991 statutes and the 1992 supplement for $49.00, with a
$20.00 credit towards a new disc with the 1993 statutes, which will sell for
$89.00. Advantages: It is relatively inexpensive, and it can be used on a Local
Area Network with no additional licensing fees. Disadvantage: All it contains
is the Florida Statutes (no cases).
2. Lawyers Cooperative Publishing makes a product called LawOesk, a
single compact disc which contains the Florida Statutes (1991, 1992 supplement,
and several earlier editions), Florida state court decisions (from 1939), and the
court rules of procedure. Not having the published cases before 1939 does not
concern lHe because we se 1 darn go back to the older ca ses I and the newer cases have
citations to those which are relevant (which means we can find them with no
difficulty). A second disc, sold separately for $225, contains the Florida
Administrative Code, which we use .so infrequently that r would not want to buy
it. The initial cost for the disc containing the cases, statutes, and rules at
their IIgovernment ratell is $1,500.00 plus $15.00 shipping. The price includes
a CO-ROM reader, a Toshiba 3401-E, which they claim has a price of $657.00 but
which is included in the package as part of the total price, (Or, think of the
deal as being $657.00 for the reader and $843.00 for the disc.) The disc without
the CD-ROM reader is not an option. Quarterly, they send you a new, updated disc
and you return tile old disc. The fee for the updates is $145.00 quarterly (or
$580.00 per year). These prices are for a single work station; placing the
systelo on a network entails a license fee. Advantage: The single-disk format
is very convenient, and saves having to change discs manually or buying a CD-ROM
reader with a carousel-type disc changer. Disadvantage: Having to buy their CD-
ROM reader eliminates our ability to find the same model for less cost, or a
better mode 1 for the same cost.
3. vlest Puul ishing produces Florida cases on three compact discs, Their
initial cost is $900.00, with $600.00 per year for updates (government rate).
The discs do not include the Florida Statutes, which will be an extra disc at an
extra cost when it becomes available in about two weeks, The cases go back to
1939. Advantage: You get the West Publishing "bells and whistles," including
the Ilkey numberll digest system and other nice features which are proprietary to
the publishing company. Disadvantages: \laving to change back and forth among
three disks is a time-consuming pain, and the discs do not include the statutes.
West Publishing also has the U.S. Code Annotated on two compact discs. The discs
\
I
,I
include the statutes, notes summarizing decisions, historical notes, and a
general index. The initial cost is $995.00, updated quarterly at a cost of $65
per month or $780 per year after the first year (the first year of updates is
free) . .
Dodd Mead, the company behind Lexis, WestLaw's on-line competitor, is not yet in
the business of providing cases or statutes on compact discs.
The rel,at ive economy of buying a CD-ROM reader with these research resources is
ill us tr a ted by compar i ng the cos ts aga i ns t the costs of WestLaw on- 1 i ne research
and the annllal costs of buying upgrades or "pocket parts" for law books.
Our WestLaw costs are a total of database usage charges, communications charges,
and 0 ff - 1 i ne t ranslIli s sian charges, bill ed month 1 y. The database usage charges
a re made up 0 f s tanda rd time, II all 5 tates" or II a 11 fed II charges, and extra charges
for using features such as EZ-Access. The rates vary according to the number of
hours per Il\onth; as time increases, the rate per minute decreases. We pay no
minimulIl monthly charge, so if a month went by without our using WestLaw we would
not be bi lled for that month. That has never happened. The rate structure is
complex and cannot be easily summarized, but here 1S our actual billing history:
Total for year Monthlv averaQe
1990 $3,696 $308
1991 4,239 353
1992 2,121 177 ,!
1993 3,265* 544
*first half of year
~lotlth ly average for 42 months: $317
1 assume that at least half the tinle' we spend on WestLaw is spent searching for
F lor i da s ta te court cases. I f we keep Wes tLaw and use it on 1y to search for
federal cases and out-of-state cases, and if the monthly- average billing drops
by only $150 per month, the initial cost of acquiring a CO,-ROM reader and either
the Lawyers Cooperative or West Publishing discs containing the state court cases
will pay for itself by the end of the first year. After the first year, the
quarterly updates will pay for themselves every four months or so. This does not
take into account the greatly enhanced ability to use the products: Because we
will not be paying by the minute, the incentive to get off-line as quickly as
possible will be replaced by an incentive to look a little longer fbr the right
case or statute.
Another source of sav ings wi 11 be the annua 1 costs of buying upgrades or lIpocket
parts" for law books. For example, if we buy the West Publishing disc containing
u.s. Code Annotated, we could discontinue our subscription to the pocket parts
and the revised volumes of our u.s. Code Service, a Lawyers Cooperative
plll>liciltioll. OUl' actual billing history for this publication, per year, is:
1991
1992
1993
Po~~eL.nn[la.
$330.00
345.00
365.00
I
I
j
;1
date)
I
I
i
.';
" \t ~ <. ,',
, .'
.;. '.
disc is $995.00. The cost of the
year. or about half the total
By contrast, the initial cost for the compact
quarterly updates is $780 per year after the first
cost to maintain this set of books in 1992.
We could save more money by discontinuing certain books that we maintain in our
law library. The law office of the future may have very few books--although I
personally would not want to place all my eggs in a basket that is not available
when the power shuts downl
HAG:a
Copies:
~1 i c h a e 1 W rig II t I
Laura Chase,
City Manager
CIS Manager
c '.'
<.'" '.""
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
FROM:
The ljonorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorne~
Computers
RE:
DATE:
Augu st 20, 1993
Let me give you a little background about the Legal Department's computer system
and explain our recommendations for upgrading the system, to give us a starting
point whe'n the time comes to discuss this department's budget.
In 1985, this department had exactly one word processor, not a computer, to be
shared by three secretaries. You can imagine how well that worked. I scrounged
enough word processors from other departments to have one for each secretary, at
no additional cost to the city, and that worked well for several years.
In 1989, we were given an opportunity I could not refuse: A computer at every
de sk, i nc lud i ng the 1 awyer I s desk s, 1 inked to a loca 1 area network, wi th Word
Perfect 5.0 as the word processing program. The system uses the 286 chip, which
was the thing to buy at that tirne, and black-and-white monitors, which were
cheaper than color monitors. We run a word processing program and a calendaring
program using DOS, not Windows.
I did not lobby for this system. Being typical of lawyers my age and older, I
avoided computers for most of my.life. Now that we have them, I have learned a
lot in a hurry and have a hard time remembering how we got along without them.
One interesting thing I have learned is this: By waiting, we got more computer
for our money than if we had bought the computers a few years sooner. But, if
you wait for the optimum computer, you will never buy one. Quality and features
have escalated almost monthly but the prices have held steady or declined. This
is a phenomenon peculiar to the computer industry.
Hhat does the L.egal Department do with computers? Word processing constitutes
almost all of the work we do with them. We have a modem and the ability to
access Wes tLaw, all on- 1 i ne 1 ega 1 research database. He can a 1 so d ia 1 into
F lor i da 's corpora te records and the county I s pub 1 ic access system for i nformat i on
regarding case dockets and other publ ic records. We ,do not crunch numbers,
prepare spreadsheets, make graphs, or prepare news letters. We do not need
multitasking or multimedia and we do not need Windows.
I saw illY first WestLaw demonstration in 1982 or thereabouts and thought it would
never replace traditional research methods by a trained human being. Six or
seven years lilter, after camping out in the county law library for several days
looking up state and federal cases on noise ordinances, I became convinced that
there had to be a better way. We bought -into WestLaw. It is not cheap, but I
can find a list of cases and get off-'Iine in the time it takes to walk to the
county law library and back, saving hours spent flipping through books the old-
fashioned way.
I
I
I
i
,I
'I
I
'1
:j
'j
:1
,
I
I
We are using the same basic computer system that was installed in 1989, except
we upgraded to Word Perfect 5.1. Current state of the art? Not by a long shot.
Better than what we had before, and still functional? Yes. I do not subscribe
to the idea of bl~ying every new upgrade that comes down the pike. I do not need
a Lear jet to go to St. Petersburg. I believe in buying the right tool for the
job. The system we have still works. Nevertheless, it should be improve~.
My specific recommendations for the Legal Department's computer system are as
follows:
1. Upgrade the monitors from black-and-white to color.
This will a llow the typist to see things such as struck-
through type, which we use a lot, but which does not
show up on a black-and-white screen without taking the
extra time to go to "Print, View Document. II It is also
easier on the eyes.
2. Upgrade the CPUls from 286 to 486 machines to speed up
the system, and to allow a CD-ROM reader tQ be added.
3. Add a CD-ROM reader, connected to the computer in our
law library. For starters, I would buy the Florida
Statutes on a disk, available from several sources for
less than $100.00. That capability alone will make the
cost of the upgrade worthwhile. I am collecting cost
data for cases on disks from several sources and I would
add that capabil ity if it wi 11 save money compared with
WestLaw on-line research.
4. I do not view an upg~ade to Word Perfect 6.0 as a real
neces s i ty for th is depa rtmen t. The new program has
bells and whistles we will never use because we do not
use graphics, scalable fonts, or spreadsheets, for
example. WP61s printing speed is 25 percent slower than
WP5.1, but its text manipulation speed is a nominal 3
percent faster. WP6ls program hogs a lot of space. The
program does ha ve E-ma i 1 and fax capab i1 it ies lntegrated
with the word processor, a plus.
If our CIS people have other recommendations designed to allow our system to work
more efficiently, such as upgrades to the network, I am all for them. We have
several very knowledgeable IIgurus" in CIS and I respect their recommendations
very much.
MAG:a
Copies:
Nichael Hright, City Manager
Laura Chase, CIS Manager
1\
'i
i
~ :
. ' '
. J.\
,\. ~. ~
.
;. ,": ~ ", ..','
'. . ~ '
.. fo...p.(~fWC(k: +;.
5~ <x--d
5d
-
d
S:d- k-+-
d
.\~\
--ro
l 6( \~ I q]
'. ~ . t. ,,_
.<:':'i'.;":.'.:'l"':':,d...",.",...
\ c.,
,. J
..'l.
''i,,,
.
5EP 0:1.'93 16:22
P.2
..
5 a e..
~.~::WATEK J~
'CLEARWA.TER, FLORIDA 34518-4148
~!
City Commi~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Nanaacr
:Fred A. Thomas, Coml11ii-~foner
F.ROM:
DATE;
COPIES:
SUBJ'BCT:
September 3, 1993
Mayor. Commissioners
Se.viJ.1eIZOm Development
-------
y ~ _ _ _ . _ _..............___... ... _ _ -4.J,... _----'lJ::>. .............--.............
..dl..............vr
Ono of the things that wu not btouaht up at the meeting was _ \1I1der oUt current City
Ortl1nana=a, Developers of large tracts orland owe the City land and money for park rocreation~
With this dcvdopmcmt, wh.a.mver the maximum amount ofland is a.vailable 10 the City, I wou1c1
like to see a park-like settinS developed for the residents of Seville. I would like it to be a
pathway leading to the Bay as the land. That pathway can be lined with Gas IJi~ and the
area at the Bay could havo a ~uple of pionic benches. This area shoWd bo large enoup so that
people can como from tho Seville comp~ and enjoy th~lWIClvc:.1 at the &:yside.
Also, the danger of the dder1y people crossina the street to their lecreatkm' Center was brOulht
up. I WQu1cl suggest that we reqaire a ,top sip aoins both dinctions, and a crosswalk path, so
that :residents automatically can sct across tho street that 'Will be. greatly .incteased in trame, so
tba:t tho)' can safely urlvo at tho recreation center.
-,
""I
.~I
I
;j
.','
.
::;;
:: ~ ~
'11
~,
Purthet, it has been discussed widely about the potenUal. damaae to trc= thaJ: are supposed to
, be saved. I wou14 Eke to see to it that the City Fomter clearly identify eacb and every tree that
!s suppoaed 10 bo savedt and whether or not tho constnlctf.on m~ la aoina to destroy b futuro
ll:lo ot that ~ If it is- dotermined that those trees ate in. jcopu<ly. then there should be major
sct--oft a,aWt tbat ;potentiAl damaae. We sbould not allow any buildin& to be buUt into the drip
line area of a tree~ Clt even close to the dflp line area. That.is 1be Forester's job to identify, and
I want to make sure that this project bas the closest en~ SCNWl)' dtu:inS tho buildlna'
proj=t, and 'durini tho &a1 planning process beforo pemUta mo issued to auaran= m~~JI'1\lm.
survlv3bmty of tho en.vlronmeataUy seluhive trees that axe plWled to ;oma1R.
I wculd also suuest lettina a copy of the Tree 0rdJnance in the City of Tampa and its adjolniJlg
County. I understand moro trees ate eapable of being saved by theit Ordinance thu our
Ord;~artee, and I would like to see a comparison between the two Orclin.anees. Thatlk you.
PAT/sr
...?~'
'}~:
.
t ~ . ~
~ ..~~.
..: '.:r
,'f~
. .,:1i
:....'l~
. <f:1
'. ".
.'.j
. ,'~
SEP 08 '93 18:32
City Commission
CITY OF CLEARWATER
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-
5~J
MEMORANDUM
"TO:
:FROM:
DATE:
copms:
SUBJECI:
City Manager
Fred A. Thomas, Commissione .
September 7, 1993
Mayor, Commissioners
-_-.--------------------~~_.--..--.--~-------_-.-------------.---------.-------~----._-..----------_._~--..
W ouki you please conduct a study on all land in the City of Clearwater that is considered to be
environmentally sensitive, that has yet to be developed. List that land in ordet of priority of
sensitivity to the environment, as well as potential pending future developments.
Look at land that is necessary fot ~ storm water runoff treatment program that is underway,
as well as land that is critical to the cleaning of' our waters through mangrove growth
opportunUy. Look at land tbat is loaded with rare species of trees.
Also, bring forward a list of all funds available for the acquisition of this land that has been set
aside by various non-profit agencies throughout the country, like that brought forward in the
debate on the ZOM development. Also, any agencies that the Federal and State government that
provide funds for purchases of the same type of land.
I would suggest that you use county, state and federal agencies and non-profit agencies
throughout the land to help cool'erate in this project. so as to be able to accomplish it in the
shortest amount of time. with the least amount of tf.e.-up of City staff time. 1 would assume that
this would take more than 8 hours to accomplish and therefore, the 8 hour rule must be invoked,
and therefore must be put before the City Commission for approval.
This Commissioner does not want to face another ZOM development, without fU"St having all
of the knowledge and all of the facts well in ad vance of what properties are endangexed
throughout our City, and then be put into a corner where he has no choice but to vote for the
, development. If this property had been cited prior to the developer bringing it forward, and it
had been designated as such, tlle City could have had better and stronger ordinances on
environmentally sensitive land. We should look at having ordinances on environmentally
sensitive land. as well as general ordinances. Thank you.
PAT/sr
.. " " ',"
':':),
":. .~.J...'.
.:.
"
M E M 0 RAN DUM
3~~.
\ 0/ '-I / 1 3
TO:
FROM:
The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney~
Computers
RE:
DA TE :
August 26, 1993
As a follow-up to my August 20 memorandum, let me share with you some information
regarding legal research resources available on compact discs.
1. We can obtain the Florida Statutes (only) for $89.00 from a
C 1 earwa ter vendor, Interact i on CD-ROM and Opt i ca 1 Disc Storage. The current
product includes the 1991 statutes and the 1992 supplement for $49.00, with a
$20.00 credit towards a new disc with the 1993 statutes, which will sell for
$89.00. Advantages: It is relatively inexpensive, and it can be used on a local
Area Network with no additional licensing fees. Disadvantage: All it contains
is the Florida Statutes (no cases).
2. Lawyers Cooperative Publishing makes a product called lawDesk, a
single compact disc which contains the Florida Statutes (1991, 1992 supplement,
and several earlier editions), Florida state court decisions (from 1939), and the
court rules of procedure. Not having the published cases before 1939 does not
concern me because we seldom go back to the older cases, and the newer cases have
citations to those which are relevant (which means we can find them with no
difficulty). A second disc, sold separately for $225, contains the Florida
Administrative Code, which we use .so infrequently that I would not want to buy
it. The initial cost for the disc containing the cases, statutes, and rules at
their "government rate" is $1,500.00 plus $15.00 shipping. The price includes
a CD-ROM reader, a Toshiba 3401-E, which they claim has a price of $657.00 but
which is included in the package as part of the total price. (Or, think of the
deal as being $657.00 for the reader and $843.00 for the disc.) The disc without
the CD-ROM reader is not an option. Quarterly, they send you a new, updated disc
and you return the old disc. The fee for the updates is $145.00 quarterly (or
$580.00 per year). These prices are for a single work station; placing the
system on a network entails a license fee. Advantage: The single-disk format
is very convenient, and saves having to change discs manually or buying a CD-ROM
reader with a carousel-type disc changer. Disadvantage: Having to buy their CO-
RaM reader eliminates our ability to find the same model for less cost, or a
better model for the same cost.
3. West Publishing produces Florida cases on three compact discs. Their
initial cost is $900.00, with $600.00 per year for updates (government rate).
The discs do not include the Florida Statutes, which will be an extra disc at an
extra cost when it becomes available in about two weeks. The cases go back to
1939. Advantage: You get the West Publishing "bells and whistles," including
the "key number" digest system and other nice features which are proprietary to
the publishing company. Disadvantages: Having to change ,back and forth among
three disks is a time-consuming pain, and the discs do not lnclude the statutes.
West Publishing also has the U.S. Code Annotated on two compact discs. The discs
~
\
include the statutes, notes summanzwg decisions, historical notes, and a
general index. The initial cost is $995.00, updated quarterly at a cost of $65
per month or $780 per year after the first,year (the first year of updates is
free) .
Dodd Mead, the company behind Lexis, WestLaw's on-line competitor, is not yet in
the business of providing cases or statutes on compact discs.
The relative economy of buying a CD-ROM reader with these research resources is
illustrated by comparing the costs against the costs of WestLaw on-line research
and the annllal costs of buying upgrades or "pocket parts" for law books.
Our WestLaw costs are a total of database usage charges, communications charges,
and off-line transmission charges, billed monthly. The database usage charges
are made up of standard time, "allstates" or "allfed" charges, and extra charges
for using features such as EZ-Access. The rates vary according to the number of
hours per month; as time increases, the rate per minute decreases. We pay no
minimum monthly charge, so if a month went by without our using WestLaw we would
not be billed for that month. That has never happened. The rate structure is
complex and cannot be easily summarized, but here is our actual billing history:
Total for year Monthly averaqe
1990 $3,696 $308
1991 4,239 353
1992 2,121 177
1993 3,265* 544
*first half of year
Monthly average for 42 months: $317
I assume that at least half the time we spend on WestLaw is spent searching for
Florida state court cases. If we keep WestLaw and use it only to search for
federal cases and out-of-state cases, and if the monthly average billing drops
by only $150 ~er month, the initial cost of acquiring a CD~ROM reader and either
the Lawyers Cooperative or West Publishing discs containing the state court cases
will pay for itself by the end of the first year. After the first year, the
quarterly updates will pay for themselves every four months or so. This does not
take into account the greatly enhanced ability to use the products: Because we
will not be paying by the minute, the incentive to get off-line as quickly as
possible will be replaced by an incentive to look a little longer for the right
case or statute.
Another source of savings will be the annual costs of buying upgrades or "pocket
parts" for law books. For example, if we buy the West Publishing disc containing
U.S. Code Annotated, we could discontinue our subscription to the pocket parts
and the revised volumes of our U.S. Code Service, a Lawyers Cooperative
puhlication. Our actual billing history for this publication, per year, is:
1991
1992
1993
Pocket parts
$330.00
345.00
365.00
Revised volumes
$ 933.80
1,164.60
640.35*
*(to date)
..
"
By contrast, the initial cost for the compact disc is $995.00. The cost of the
quarterly updates is $780 per year after the first year, or about half the total
cost to maintain this set of books in 1992.
We could save more money by discontinuing certain books that we maintain in our
law library. The law office of the future may have very few books--although I
personally would not want to place all my eggs in a basket that is not available
when the power shuts downl
MAG:a
Copies:
Michael Wright, City Manager
Laura Chase, CIS Manager
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorne~
Computers
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
August 20, 1993
Let me give you a little background about the Legal Department's computer system
and explain our recommendations for upgrading the system, to give us a starting
point when the time comes to discuss this department's budget.
In 1985, this department had exactly one word processor, not a computer, to be
shared by three secretaries. You can imagine how well that worked. I scrounged
enough word processors from other departments to have one for each secretary, at
no additional cost to the city, and that worked well for several years.
In 1989, we were given an opportunity I could not refuse: A computer at every
desk, including the lawyer's desks, linked to a local area network, with Word
Perfect 5.0 as the word processing program. The system uses the 286 chip, which
was the thing to buy at that time, and black-and-white monitors, which were
cheaper than color monitors. We run a word processing program and a calendaring
program using DOS, not Windows.
I did not lobby for this system. Being typical of lawyers my age and older, I
avoided computers for most of my.life. Now that we have them, I have learned a
lot in a hurry and have a hard time remembering how we got along without them.
One interesting thing I have learned is this: By waiting, we got more computer
for our money than if we had bought the computers a few years sooner. But, if
you wait for the optimum computer, you will never buy one. Quality and features
have escalated al"mst monthly but the prices have held steady or declined. This
is a phenomenon peculiar to the computer industry.
What does the Legal Department do with computers? Word processing constitutes
almost all of the work we do with them. We have a modem and the ability to
access WestLaw, an on-line legal research database. We can also dial into
Florida's corporate records and the county's public access system for information
regard i ng case dockets and other pub 1 i c records. We do not crunch numbers,
prepare spreadsheets, make graphs, or prepare news letters. We do not need
multitasking or multimedia and we do not need Windows.
I saw my first WestLaw demonstration in 1982 or thereabouts and thought it would
never replace traditional research methods by a trained human being. Six or
seven years later, after camping out in the county law library for several days
looking up state and federal cases on noise ordinances, I became convinced that
there had to be a better way. We bought into WestLaw. It is not cheap, but I
can find a list of cases and get off-line in the time it takes to walk to the
county law library and back, saving hours spent flipping through books the old-
fashioned way.
.,
We are using the same basic computer system that was installed in 1989, except
we upgraded to Word Perfect 5.1. Current state of the art? Not by a long shot.
Better than what we had before, and still functional? Yes. I do not subscribe
to the idea of buying every new upgrade that comes down the pike. I do not need
a Lear jet to go to St. Petersburg. I believe in buying the right tool for the
job. The system we have still works. Nevertheless, it should be improved.
My specific recommendations for the Legal Department's computer system are as
follows:
1. Upgrade the monitors from black-and-white to color.
This will allow the typist to see things such as struck-
through type, which we use a lot, but which does not
show up on a black-and-white screen without taking the
extra time to go to "Print, View Document. II It is also
easier on the eyes.
2. Upgrade the CPUls from 286 to 486 machines to speed up
the system, and to allow a CD-ROM reader to be added.
3. Add a CD-ROM reader, connected to the computer in our
law library. For starters, I would buy the Florida
Statutes on a disk, available from several sources for
less than $100.00. That capability alone will make the
cost of the upgrade worthwhile. I am collecting cost
data for cases on disks from several sources and I would
add that capability if it will save money compared with
WestLaw on-line research.
4. I do not view an upgrade to Word Perfect 6.0 as a real
necess ity for th i s department. The new program has
bells and whistles we will never use because we do not
use graphics, scalable fonts, or spreadsheets, for
example. WP61s printing speed is 25 percent slower than
WP5.1, but its text manipulation speed is a nominal 3
percent faster. WP61s program hogs a lot of space. The
program does have E-mail and fax capabil ities integrated
with the word processor, a plus.
If our CIS people have other recommendations designed to allow our system to work
more efficiently, such as upgrades to the network, I am all for them. We have
several very knowledgeable "gurus" in CIS and I respect their recommendations
very much.
MAG:a
Copies:
Michael Wright, City Manager
Laura Chase, CIS Manager
,
COMMISSION RULES
RULE 1
~o ct.
,o!'i!r3
A quorum for the transaction of business by the City Commission shall consist of
three (3) Commissioners. Presiding officer of the City Commission shall be the
Mayor-Commissioner. In case of his absence, the Vice Mayor shall assume those
responsibilities, and if both are absent, the senior Commissioner in years of
service shall preside. The presiding officer shall preserve order. He may call
to order any member of the Commission who shall violate any of the rules; and,
when in the chair, he shall decide all questions of order, subject to a majority
vote on a motion to appeal. The chair shall recognize all Commissioners who seek
the floor under correct procedure. Normally, members of the public shall be
allowed to speak, but they shall be limited to three (3) minutes speaking time
per issue. All questions shall be stated and put by him, and he shall declare
a 11 votes.
RULE 2
(rev. 7-1-93)
The City Clerk shall make correct minutes of the proceedings of each Commission
meet i ng, and sha 11 furn i sh cop i es of the mi nutes of each regu 1 ar 1)' schcdl:ll ed
meeting to the Mayor-Commissioner and to each Commissioner at least twenty fOl:lr
(21) hours prior to the ncxt regular mceting. Copies of the minutes of a reoular
daytime meetinG shall be furnished at least seven days. when possible. prior to
the next reGular daytime meetinG, and copies of the minutes of a reGular nioht
meetinG shall be furnished at least seven days, when possible, in advance of the
next reqular niGht meetino. Such minutes shall stand confirmed at the regular
meeting of the Commission without the reading thereof in open meeting unless some
inaccuracy or error be pointed out by some member of the Commission present, and
in such event, an appropriate correction shall be made. Upon request, the City
Manager will cause the City Clerk to provide any Commissioner with transcribed
excerpts of tapes of City Commission \!ork:hops or regblbr or speciJ.' meetings.
RULE 3
All motions shall be made and seconded before debate. Every ordinance shall be
read at two (2) distinct Commission meetings before it is passed, except when it
is designated an emergency and receiving a 2/3 vote of the Commission. Such
emergency ordinance shall remain effective for ninety days after effective date.
All resolutions, ordinances and contracts require three (3) affirmative votes for
passage.
CCRULES
revised 7/2/93
,
RULE 4
A copy of each ordinance when passed shall be furnished by the City Clerk to the
heads of all City departments concerned.
RULE 5
(rev. 2-20-86; 5-1-86; 1-7-93; 7-1-93)
(1) The City Commission shall meet on the first and third Thursdays of
each month at 6:00 p.m. in its chamber ("reaula~ niaht meetinas"), and on the
Mondays before the first and third Thursdays at 9:00 a.m. or at such other time
as shall be announced not less than 24 hours in advance (IIreaular daytime
meetinasll). Special meetings may be held on call of the Mayor-Commissioner, City
Manager or any two of the members and, \'Ihenc'/cr possiblc, upon no less than 24
t:cnty four (21) hours p~blic notice to the public and to the members of the Citv
Commission.
(2) Aaenda items may be scheduled for a reaular daytime meetina or a
reaular niaht meetina, except that items reauirina a public hearinq shall be
scheduled for reaular niaht meetinas. Except as may be reschcd~lcd from time to
timc ',/hcn necessary due to conflict, a '.Jorl< session shall be held at 9:00 a.m.
on the first \'wrl<ing day of the CommissioA meeting '....eel<. ',.Iork sessions are
primarily designed for information gathering and guidance, and no formal
Commission decision approving or disapproving an agenda item or items scheduled
for public hearing may be made.
(3) Except for items advertised for public hearing, items may be removed
from the agenda and additional items may be added. The agenda may be reordered.
Minutes shall be taken and distributed by the City Clerk. Only staff members
shall be included in the work session discussion unless prior arrangements are
made through the City Manager.
(4) A regular meeting or special meeting shall conclude at approximately
midnight unless the time of adjournment is extended by the unanimous consent of
the members of the Commission in attendance. The Mayor shall adjourn the meeting
upon the conclusion of the item of business which is under discussion at
midnight. Wit the unanimous consent of the members of the Commission in
attendance, the meeting may be extended for such time as is necessary to discuss
and act upon any of the remaining items of business on the agenda as the members
may agree. Uncompleted agenda items shall be automatically postponed to the next
regular meting and included on the appropriate agenda unless such items are
placed upon the agenda of a later regular meeting or a special meeting, as a
majority of the members in attendance may agree. Notwithstanding the.foregoing,
the setting of meeting dates, the scheduling of uncompleted agenda ltems for a
regular or special meeting, and a motion to adjourn shall be in order regardless
of the time of night.
CCRULES
2
revised 7/2/93
,
(5) Four (4) regional meetings shall be scheduled during the year,
excluding June, July, August and December. They will be scheduled at City-owned
facilities throughout the corporate limits when possible.
RULE 6
The City Commission shall appoint all committees and advisory boards in
accordance with the provisions of the administrative code. The City Clerk shall
furnish each committee or advisory board with copies of all resolutions or
ordinances relating to the concerns of said committee or advisory board, which
sha 11 be de 1 i vered by the most economi ca 1 method to the cha i rman of such
committee or advisory board within four (4) days after the passage of the same,
or as soon thereafter as possible.
RULE 7
(rev. 6-20-85)
No Commissioner shall vote in his official capacity on a matter in which that
Commissioner has a direct or indirect personal or financial interest, or which
inures to his special private gain, or to the special gain of any principal by
whom he is employed or otherwise retained. He must also state at the public
meeting the nature of his interest and within fifteen (15) days after the
Commission meeting file with the City Clerk a Form 4 to describe the nature of
his interest in the matter. The Form 4 shall be received by the City Clerk and
incorporated into the minutes of the meeting.
RULE 8
The City officials whose regular attendance shall be required during the sittings
of the Commission shall be the City Clerk, City Manager and City Attorney or
their substitutes; but all or any other officers of the City shall be bound to
attend any meetings upon direction of the City Manager or by special request of
any Commissioner to the City Manager.
RULE 9
No citizen, except those determined to be out of order and subject to removal by
the Chief of Police, shall be excluded from any meeting of the Commission whether
it be regularly scheduled or specially called.
CCR ULES
3
revised 7/2/93
r
RULE 10
(rev. 2-20-86; 12-1-88; 12-17-92; 7-1-93)
ill The order of business for a reoular nioht meetino shall ordinarily
be:
I. Procedure
A. Special recognitions and awards.
B. Minutes of previous meetings.
C. Citizcns to bc Hcard rc itcms Rot on agcnda.
~ ~ Public hearings (not before 6:00 p.m.)
Leqislative and administrative matters:
1. City Clerk announces public hearing duly advertised.
2. Presentation of issues by City staff.
3. Statement of case by applicant or representative (5 minutes).
4. Statement of case by opposition (5 minutes).
5. Commission questions.
6. Comments in support and comments in opposition.
a. Individual (3 minutes).
b. Spokesperson for groups (10 minutes).
7. Commission questions.
8. Rebuttal by opposition (5 minutes).
9. Final rebuttal by applicant or representative (5 minutes).
10. Commission motion to determine disposition.
Variance applications:
1. City Clerk announces public hearing duly advertised.
2. Staff states its recommendation and briefly summarizes its
reasons for the recommendation (2 minutes).
3. Applicant presents case, including its testimony and exhibits.
Witness may be cross-examined (15 minutes).
4. Staff presents further evidence. May be cross-examined (10
minutes).
5. Public comment (3 minutes per speaker).
6. City Commission discussion, and may question any witness.
7. Applicant may call witnesses in rebuttal (5 minutes).
8. Conclusion by applicant (3 minutes).
9. Decision.
All time limits may be extended upon request, and upon approval of
request by majority of City Commission.
CCRULES
4
re~sed 7(.U93
~.
f
RULE 14
Any member of the Commission making a motion or second shall address the Chairman
and await recognition before speaking. The Chair must recognize any person who
seeks the floor while entitled to it. The person making the motion is entitled
to the floor first for debate. No one ;s entitled to the floor a second time on
the same motion as long as any other member who has not spoken on the issue
desires the floor. When a motion is made and seconded, it shall be stated by the
Chairman before any debate shall be in order. Upon presentation of agenda items,
members may ask questions and request additional information prior to making
motions. For a member to discuss a matter while no motion is pending requires
permission from the Commission. Motions and any amendments can be withdrawn or
modified by the maker at any time prior to the Chair stating the question on the
motion; after that time, the permission of the Commission majority must be
obtained. The Chair cannot close debate as long as any member who has not
exhausted his right to debate desires the floor except by an affirmative vote of
four (4) members. A tie vote shall constitute a continuance to the next
regularly scheduled meeting.
RULE 15
The following motions are not debatable:
To adjourn;
To lay on the table;
To take from the table;
For the previous question.
RULE 16
Individuals speaking on non-agenda items shall be limited to not less than three
but not more than five minutes.
RULE 17
The Commission shall, at the direction of the Chair, take a ten minute break
approximately every two hours, and may recess for dinner, if the members of the
City Commi s s i on agree by the i r vote.
RULE 18
(rev. 6-20-85)
All material prepared by the City Manager for the Commission shall be provided
to the press and to the public via a special box in the City Clerk's office.
Reports shall be made available in the Clerk's office for the public to review.
CCR ULES
6
revised 712193
~
~
RULE 19
(rev. 6-20-85; 5-1-86; 4-20-89)
All mail to the Mayor-Commissioner and the Commissioners arrlvlng at City Hall
received pursuant to the law or in connection with the transaction of official
business by the City of Clearwater shall be copied as follows:
A. Each Commission member will receive the original of items addressed
to them and copies of everything will continue to be made for the
City Clerk.s Office and the City Attorney's Office, the citizens.
file, the press file, and the read file.
B. Anonymous letters will not be distributed.
C. Publications and lengthy agenda materials for other boards upon
which the Commissioners serve will not be copied. Only the agendas
will be circulated. Items of considerable length (such as
petitions) will not be copied, but instead a memo will be
distributed announcing the availability of the item in the office.
D. Mail with the words similar to "Personal", "Confidential", or "For
the Addressee Only" will be delivered unopened to the addressee.
E. The Mayor-Commissioner and Commissioners receiving individually
addressed mail will be responsible for replying, asking the City
Manager or City Attorney to rep ly, or p 1 ac i ng the matter on the
agenda for formal Commission consideration.
F. The City Manager will be responsible for seeing that mail addressed
to the Mayor and other City Commissioners is properly answered or
placed on the agenda.
G. The City Manager will answer individual complaint letters.
H. The City Manager will discuss with the Mayor malicious mail.
CCRULES
7
revised. 712193
f (
Resolution No.
77-44
77-129
78-65
80-62
80-101
80-118
81-32
81-92
82-33
82-36
82-115
82 -119
83-42
83-75
85-47
86-18
86-30
88-61
89-21
92-79
93-4
93-44
93-45
CCRULES
COMMISSION RULES
RESOLUTIONS
Date of Resolutions
5-12-77
11-23-77
6-1-78
5-15-80
9-19-80
11-6-80
4-16-81
8-6-81
4-1-82
4-15-82
12-16-82
12-16-82
4-7-83
7-7-83
6-20-85
2-20-86
5-1-86
12-1-88
4-20-89
12-17-92
1-7-93
7-1-93
7-1-93
9
revised 712193
\ \
Add a new Rule 20 to read:
RlrLE 20
No member of the Commission shall furnish, directly or indirectly,
any information to any provider of services or materials to the
City if such information places or could reasonably be expected to
place such provider in an advantageous position with respect to one
or more other providers of services or materials in bidding for
contracts with the City. As used in this rule, "provider" includes
but is not limited to any prospective provider whether a bid is
submitted or not.
.
~
OFFICERS
PIlBSm8NT
1_- .......
VICB PIlBSlD~
BN ..""
'lJUWlrnum
No... E. I'fI7b
SBClUtTAlfJ'
,..., S. IIIIz
mnoMAN
~ ".".,.....,.
PA1UlAJIIlNTAlUAN
nahM,. ...w,.
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
B_ c.u-
1'nceJ om.
0.. P......
baJ 0.1'"
Loll a.ow.y
The North Greenwood ASSociation'c~A~ht.O
P.O. Box 805 COMMISS' \1
Clearwater, FL 34617-0805 PRESS
Date 'I\UG c
CITV CLEh{\
b#
I <J/Lf(r J
; "'S'
11.. '"
.1 \....; ...J
'-
TO Mayor Rita Garvey and The Clearwater City Commissioners;
The North Greenwood Association, Inc. would like to take
this opportuni ty to express its' dissatisfaction with the
decision of the Commission to recant its' resolution to
change the name of Plaza Park to Lamar 0' Byron Ford Memor ial
Park. As you are well aware, The North Greenwood
Association, Inc. followed all of the neces,sary procedures
set forth by the regulator boards to expedite the renaming
of Plaza Park. However, this procedure went unopposed until
your last meeting where two gentlemen, one a resident, and
the other a landlord, spoke out in opposi tion. The problem
that the North Greenwood Association, Inc. has wi th this is
too lengthy to discuss at this time. We would like}> to
request an opportuni ty to be heard at your next meeting. We
al~o feel that the Commission acted too hastily in their
decis ion on that evening. It is seldom that a decision on
an issue that is so vi tal and important as this one, is
allowed to be pushed aside by two men who are clearly not
the voice of The Plaza Park Communi ty. They are certainly
not the voice of the North Greenwood Community, which
includes Plaza Park within its' boundries. Furthermore, the
family of Lamar Ford was 'pr~sent at the meeting where the
Commission unanimously voted for the name change. It was
painful enough to lose a child to senseless violence, let
alone to have our emotions played wi th by Ci ty Government.
The North Greenwood Association, Inc. Respectfully request
that this Commission honors its' original decision of the
renaming of Plaza Park to the Lamar 0' Byron Ford Memorial
Park. We now have 70 Plaza Park area residents signa-
tures on a peti tion to rename the Park. Please respond to
us in writing at your earliest convenience.
~::-y,vU~
~ 'J.
Jonathan Wade, President
cc: Ream Wilson
Tampa Tribune
St. Petersburg Times
North Greenwood Association,In
"STRIVING TOWARD COMMUNITY EXCELLENCE"
~
on1CEIfS
,.USIDENT
JorwdtM """.
WCll nu;smliNT
... -....r
TllEASUltElf
Nomt4., ,.tub
IIiClfU.c1ff
,.", S, Illrc
BlfJfHlL4R
~ Abar-1td/JIl
,.ilIfUAJl1INTAnAN
n.hruuI,. "',ZU,.
.lMlllJ 01'
DIJl1!CTOIfS
~n 0."""
n..,.,. Do",
"- 1'13116
18., OlIn.,
lAb """.,
. - .'.
The North Gre.enwoqd A'~soGiatiorj, Inc.
:::' P.O. Box 805: " '
.. '
Clearwater, FL'34611-080$
. <~. " .~> ~~.; :i
~.
,. .,
.' .~.
f "
" t \
" ','
~.' ..
: ,.,
:~I
TO The Clearwater'~ayor and Cofumiss~on~r~,:
':. ).
). ~ .'
.'
.:'
/
.. ~~ '.;
';i
":' '.,
',;'
~~ " ,',
'f."~ ,'0 .(;
PRoposAL
'. ,', .~.
:t. ,
.,.';
..-.
"
~:.
PARK RENAMING
f,
The North Greenwood Association ,,;Inc ~ Hereby requests', that
our ci ty Commissipners consider a: request to rename Plaza
Park in honor of L~mar O'Byron;,Ford~ :.
This request is to include c{ Mernoricll ';' Plaque which will
include :the names, of Youth who have lost, their lives wi thin
the Plaz~ Park are~ becaus~ 'of0Drug;Tr~ffi~ing.
The North Greenwood Association" ; I~c. wants' to help
eliminate drugtrafficing in a'~viabJe ~eig.hborhood,~ that, once
maintained Communi,ty Streq:gth,:;. The,refore ',':let it be resolved
that The North, Greenwood' Ass'ociat,ion, Inc. firml,)' supports
this renaming: of,::- Plaza 'park;", to :read "Lamar 0 I Byron ,:Ford
Memorial,Park"." " ,; ,<;;, ".
'\',
~!. , '<7, <.
Respec"tfullY ,sUbmi~ted,(
,{
.''';
J::'
Jonathan Wade, pr~sideht
North~ Greenwood A~soci~tion, Inc.
.;.;
..,
~,
:~
~..
"
.( .
C.C.Michael Wright~ ~ityManag~r . .
Ream Wilson~ Directo~ 6f P~rk~ ~nd~ec~
" "
,,'
"
" .
;~
.,' .'.~
,', .~:<.
"
,
;.
, "
" 0' ,
rt ..:.'.
:"; ,.
':,
"
"
, :
'~ .
,', "
.
':'
::
PSR
,
....f
.'.
.
,
1',
~
"
-.
:~
" 0
.'....
:1
'"
,
:
"
';:'
.':
'",
"
",'
. ~.
:.
~
"
'j
1.,.
~
....
',.
',z..
"
"
:'STRIVING TOWARD COMMUNITf EXCELLEN~E" .'~,
^.~ / .;"1. .,. ,~
,....
.,'
"
.:.
.~ .
.~
.,
,() F C L:~E A R W ATE R
. POST OFFice BOX 4748
C lEA A W ATE A. F lOA IDA 3 4 6 1 8 . 4 7 4 8
.~
C I T Y
.,
,;.
~.~
..... 'r.
-;:.7
Office of Parks and Recreation
'.
(813) 462-6531 :~
'~
.
:'>~
July 1, 1993
,.
{'"
'~'t
Mr. Jonathan Wade, President
North Greenwood Associati~~,
P.O. Box 805
Clearwater, FL
Inc~,
.~
'"
"
Dear Mr. Wade:
"
34617-0805,.
J.
."
;
.
.~..
'i'
,~.
if ~
I'm writing in response to the letter you sent to the Mayor and
City commissioners asking that Plaza Park be renamed "Lamar O'Byron
Ford Memorial Park. ,,:': ;
l
\. ..-
In accord with city Resolution 80~82, I discussed your request ~ith
our Parks and Recreation Board on Monday night, ,June 28. The Parks
and Recreation Board has recommended in favor of your request and
I am p'reparing an agenda item to be placed on the city commission
Agenda for their meeting pf August 2, 1993. 'if approved by the
city Commission, our depa~tment will then purchase and install an
identification sign. ~ L; .
"
We look forward to working~with you on this proj~ctand please feel
free to contact me at 462-6531 in~the event'you;have any questions
or desire further information. ,~ j , '
~:.
.,~ --:
(:~.
sincerely, A
/L~D~
Ream Wilson
Director
."
(~-
~
'.'~
.~
cc:
Mike Wright, city
"
Ma~ager
"":
i~
:!:
,;
~
S
}
,
{
:j~
"
.t
RW:LB
<..
'"
(
-J;
:"'. :
r"
~.
\;
i'
,.;
.;
;
, ~.
r
c.
.,
"
.~
.
r~.
.....,.
(~
. ~.
.'
,.,
.
:l'
~
"
'1
.~
r:
~{
o
j'
.. E qua I E m p I 0 Y m e ~. I and A IIi r m a Ii v e A'c I i O~? E '!' P I 0 Y e r ..
.j~ .'--. .:~
t
CITY
o F
C LEA R 'V ATE n.
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ^ T E R. F LOR I 0 ^ 3" 6 1 0 . ., i ., !l
Office of Parks and Recreation
(813) 462-6531
July 14, 1993
Ms. Cherry Harris
1028 North Madison Avenue
Clearwater, FL 34615
Dear Ms. Harris:
I'm writing in response to your letter of July 7, 1993, wherein
you requested that Plaza Park be named "Lamar Ford Park".
As mentioned to you the other day when you visited our office, a
recommendation on this subject has been forwarded to the city
commission and will be placed on the Commission Agenda for the
meeting of August 2, 1993. Specifically, the Parks and
Recreation Board has approved, the change in names and is
recommending to the city commission that Plaza Park be named
"Lamar O'Byron Ford Memorial Park". This is also in accord with
a letter we received from Mr. Jonathan Wade, President of the
North Greenwood Association.
Please contact me if you have any questions or desire further
information.
sincerely,
/-7c--- h/~ "
Ream Wilson,
Director
CC: Muhammad Abdur-Rahi~
Public Service
'INFRAS.I1UCTURE GnOUjl
COPIES TO __..____._ .._. _____
FILE __._____._ - .--- ---
.JUt I ') lQr,~:
(;f~~~ ~~
V Wl:r
CJ rF./J
o
... -,
r.:'.,
[1 ^Oll
[J
'I'I:-
nJ~/.
n
~\
(G. .,
"Equal Employment and ^"irm'llive Aclion Employ,q"
~
C I T Y
o F
CLEARWATER
! "
INFnN) I fll Jr; 'J ~y:/~r~~l If E R.
COPlrS10
;:ILE .__ _ ..__ . _ n_ _ _
,llll 2 0 100;
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
FLORIDA 34618-4748
Office of Parks and Recreation
(813) 462-6531
r,S
t1 1\011
o
r.J rlnt,
Will
Uinl.
lJ
July 16, 1993
Uw
r:J JCM
(J
Mr. Jonathan Wade
North Greenwood Association, Inc.
P.O. Box 805
Clearwater, FL 34617-0805
Dear Mr. Wade:
As you are aware, a recommendation has been forwarded to the city
commission to rename Plaza Park "Lamar O'Byron Ford Memorial Park."
This is in accord with a request from the North Greenwood
Association, Inc.
Please be advised that this item will be scheduled for the city
commission Meeting of Thursday, August 5, 1993. The meeting begins
at 6:00 p.m. but we're not sure yet as to what time the item will
be on the agenda. You might want to call our office on the day of
the meeting at which time we should have an agenda schedule.
originally, this item was to be on the Commission schedule for
August 2 but I wanted you to know that it has been changed to
August 5. Please contact me if you have any questions or if I can.
provide further information.
Sincerely,
~h/-
Ream Wilson
Director
~ammad Abdur-Rahim
1028 North Madison Avenue
Clearwater, FL 34615
~
cc:
Mrs. Cherry Harris
P.O. Box 805
Clearwater, FL 34617-0805
~..
\.~
"Equal Employment and AffIrmative Action Employer
~ TIMES. SATURDAY, AUGUST 7, 1993 CT
c
BRIEFL Y
l
Countryside High plans post-flood party
Countryside High School's Class of '95 wants to help students at
North High School in Des Moines, Iowa, throw an awesome
homecoming party when the water recedes. "We wish to give
(them) a positive event to look forward to," said junior class
secretary Michelle Ralat. To help with the party, she and other
members of Countryside High's Student Government Association
will be collecting formal attire for the students at North High.
Donated items, including dresses, shoes, suits, shirts, ties and
accessories (marked for size) may be dropped off at Countryside
High School from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. today. The students also are
planning a goll tournament Oct. 2 at Westchase Golf Club, 10311
Radcliffe Drive, Tampa. For information about the tournament,
call Bill Gilkes at 799-2397.
Park renamed for victim in drug incident
CLEARWATER ~ A park in the North Greenwood neighborhood
Is being renamed the Lamar O'Byron Ford Memorial Park. The.
park is to serve as a memorial to children who have died in the
area in violence related to drug trafficking. late Thursday night,
the City Commission unanimously approved a resolution to give
the park - known before as Plaza Park - the new name. The
commission also directed staff to place a plaque In the park
listing names of young victims provided by the North Greenwood
Association. Muhammad Abdur-Rahim, the association's
historian, said {he park's renaming is part of an effort to Improve
the area, generally bordered by North Greenwood Avenue,Vine
Avenue, Jones Street and Plaza Street. Lamar Ford was a
3-year-old boy killed in 1991 by a hit-and-run driver in what
authorities called a drug deal gone bad. The boy was playing In
his grandparents' front yard, near the park, when he was killed.
Volunteers are needed for Cleanup Day .
CLEARWATER - Volunteers are needed to help with Cleanup
Day planned from 7 a.m. to 1 :30 p.m. Aug. 14 In the North
Greenwood area. The project will start at the Martin Luther King
Jr. Center, 1201 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave., Clearwater. Bring
rakes, gloves, garbage bags and hand tools. Lawn service
companies are asked to help mow lawns. For information, call
Jonny Gammage at 461-0011, ext. 231.
Fire guts busil
~
,.
A two-alarm fire consumed the
Gulf-to-Bay Blvd., Clearwater,
were exposed to pesticides, bu
Chute from Page 1 and kept it in the doset. 1 never ceased, her father-in-law will walk I
paid much attention to it.... I her down the aisle today.
ago near the copy machine at their. never even thought of preserving "The original soldier will be r
workplace. it." walking the brid~ down the aisle,"
"That's our little joke now," When Ayers tried the dress on, Ayers said. "That means he'll be ,
Ayers said. "We say, 'Let me show it fit perfectly. No alterations were seen with that dress twice in his t
you the copier,' because that's required. The only problems were lifetime. " c
what he said to 'me when 1 frrst that the dress had turned brown The wedding is at 2 p.m, at St. ~
started there." and the headwork had deteriorated Patrick's Catholic Church in Lar- u
lacheUo and Ayers have been after 47 years of sitting in a box. go. The reception will follow at the. r
engaged for 2Yz years. One day the Ayers had the dress profes- Radisson Suite Resort on Sand (
~ ouple were visiting IachelIo's par- sionally cleaned, and Mrs. lachello Key. The lachellos' honeymoon
nts and discussing wedding plans redid the headwork. The total cost will he in Las Vegas. F
when the subject of the wedding for repairs came to a little more About 110 people are expected t:
dress came up. than $100. to attend the wedding, including fl .
"Joseph was so excited," Mrs. "She's a size 8," Mrs. lachello four people from the original bridal a
lachello said. "He kept telling me said. "I can't believe 1 was ever party 47 years ago. And, once
to get the dress out so Liz could try tha t thin!" again, seven bridesmaids will help iI
it on. . . . I had just put it in a box ~cause Ayers' parents are de- carry the 13-foot train. "
. --
~
f
AGENDA _ CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING - August 5, 1993 (6:00 P.M.)
* 8/4 revised
Welcome. We are glad to have you join us. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then
state your llilUll1 and address. Persons speaking before the City Commission on other than Public
Hearing items shall be limited to 3 minutes. No person shall speak more than once on the same
subject unless granted permission by the City Commission.
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Invocation
3. Service Awards
4. Introductions and Awards
5. Presentations:
a) Bombers request for funding - Peter
PorcellifTodd Pressman
*b)Hurricane Awareness 1993 - Val Mahan
6. Minutes of Regular Meeting July 15, 1993
Not Before 6:00 P.M. - Scheduled Public Hearings
(1) Presentation of issues by City staff.
(2) Statement of case by applicant or
representative (5 minutes).
(3) Statement of case by opposition (5
minutes) .
(4) Commission questions.
(5) Comments in support and in opposition: (a)
individual (3 minutes); (b) spokesperson for
groups (10 minutes).
(6) Commission questions.
(7) Rebuttal by opposition (5 minutes).
(8) Final rebuttal by applicant or representative
(5 minutes).
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. (Cont. from 7/15/93) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5387-93 - revisions to Ch. 52 re:
tree protection (PW)
8. (Cont. from 7/15/93) Public Hearing - Declaration Parcel No. 481 along C.R.611 (McMullen
Booth Road) as surplus, approval of deed for r-o-w to Pinellas County & Res. #93-08 authorizing
execution of an agreement for relocation of city utilites (PW)
8a. Public Hearing - Declare surplus & approve sale to FOOT Parcel 103.1 C re: widening S.R.580 for
$55,100 for mitigation purposes & Res. #93-48 - authorizing conveyance by Special Warranty
Deed of said city-owned interests
9. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5414-93, #5415-93 & #5416-93 - Annexation, Land Use
Plan Amendment to Low Density Residential and RS-6 Zoning for property located at 2197 Bell-
Cheer Dr., Bell-Cheer Sub., E 100' of Lots 20 & 21,0.32 acres 01.0.1. (The Word of Faith
Church of God A93-10; LUP93-15)(PLD)
10. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5417-93, #5418-93 & #5419-93 - Annexation, Land Use
Plan Amendment to Low Density Residential and RS-8 Zoning for property located at 3116
Wolfe Rd., Bayview Bluff, Lot N, 0.21 acres 01.0.1. (Nosek A93-11; LUP93-16)(PLD)
8/5/93
1
, ,,''''''.''
l..~ "',r .'....,.....".t\~..,..,..p~~,,'J ~j .'....~I,"-....\~'..l:~:-~.~ .'''~"~~'''':'''''\f'ir.r.;f.:'(<JN~-.~~~~'''\~~~llIIlPl~'r~."7t;rll'r..',"":'fIr"'_~~
t \.
.
11. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5420-93, #5421-93 & #5422-93 - Annexation, Land Use
Plan Amendment to Low Density Residential and RS-8 Zoning for property located at 3201
Drew St., part of Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 12.02,0.54 acres m.o.1. (Winn A93-12; LUP93-17)(PLD)
12. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5423-93, #5424-93 & #5425-93 - Annexation, Land Use
Plan Amendment to Commercialrrourist Facilities and CG Zoning for property located at 2220
Drew St., Temple Terrace, First Addition, Blk 0, Lots 27 & 28, 0.40 acres m.o.1. (JES Properties
Inc. A93-13; LUP93-18)(PLD)
13. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5426-93, #5427-93 & #5428-93 - Annexation, Land Use
Plan Amendment to Low Density Residential and RS-8 Zoning for property located at 1001
Brookside Dr., Oak Lake Estates, Lot 1,0.20 acres m.o.1. (O'Brien (Kelll A93-14; LUP93-
20HPLD)
14. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5435-93, #5436-93 & #5437-93 - Annexation, Land Use
Plan Amendment to Low Density Residential and RS-8 Zoning for property located at 2720
S.R.590, Virginia Grove Terrace, Third Add, Blk 6, Lot 1, 0.25 acre m.o.1. (Higlueros A93-15,
LUP93-21 HPLD)
15. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5441-93 - RPD Zoning for the Moorings of Sand Key (a/k/a
the Estates at Sand Key) located E of Gulf Blvd., S of Marina Del Rey and E of Isle of Sand Key,
Sec. 30-29-15, Parcels A, Band C and Lots 1-36 & approval of preliminary site plan wI final
plan to be returned for approval at time of 2nd reading of rezoning ordinance (Marden
Enterprises Z93-09HPLD)
16. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5411-93 - amending Sec. 42.21, to provide for
reconstruction or replacement of structures occupied by nonconforming single family residential
uses that are damaged or destroyed in excess of 50% of replacement cost (LDCA 93-03)(PLD) -
To be Cont.
17. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5431-93 & #5432-93 - Land Use Plan Amendment to
Commercialrrourist Facilities and CG Zoning for property located at 1201-1215 Drew St.,
Pagett's Estates Sub., Lot 1 less S 65' and less W 15', 0.58 acres m.o.1. (Uhrich LUP93-19;
Z93-08HPLD) - To be Cont.
Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances
18. Ord. #5429-93 - Vacating southerly 1.5' of northerly 15' of westerly 32' of easterly 47' of the
15' utility easement lying along the northerly side of Lot 14, Blk G, Salls' Lake Park 2nd
Addition (Beneficial Savings V93-05)
19. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
.. 20 City Attorney Audit Consultant Selection
.. 20a (Cont. from 8/2/931 Contract for marina building improvements to Anderson & Birchard
Design/Build Group, Inc., for $74,873; transfer of $16,857 from unappropriated retained
earnings of the marina fund into CIP 93483 (MRl
.. 20b Mr. & Mrs. Edward Metallo re: Marina Re9taurant Lease to include sale of packaged beer to go
8/5/93
2
\
....r'l'f-.',:r:::;~~~ ',~ "'j.,-t'~.
It
,i
.
I .
* 20c (Cont. from 8/2/93) Extension of contract for periodical subscriptions and serial standing orders
! with Ebsco Subscription. Services. Birmingham. AL, for the period 10/1/93-9/30/94. for an est.
$65.000 (LIB)
* 20d (Cont. from 8/2/93) FY 1993-94 HOME Funding Agreement with Pinellas County for utilization
of funding to be provided under the HOME federal housing program (PLD)
* 20e Res. #93-46 _ naming city property located on Pennsylvania Ave., between Plaza St. and Jones
St. as "Lamar O'Byron Ford Memorial Park" (PR)
21. Now item 20b
22. Preliminary Site Plan & Plat for Pelican Port located at 305 Island Way Blvd., Island Estates
(SmithHPLD)
23. Informational presentation by City Environmental Management & FL Dept of Environmental
Protection staff describing various elements of Watershed Management Planning in Clearwater
(PW)
24. Vagrancy report
25. Other Pending Matters
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
First Reading Ordinances
26. Ord. #5434-93 - Relating to appointive boards and committees; amending Sees. 2.063, 2.064 &
2.068 to require that members be residents of the City except for the Community Relations
Board; prohibiting city employees from membership
27. Other City Attorney Items
28. City Manager Verbal Reports
a) Environmental Advisory Committee re: Bayside Arbors
b) Clearwater Housing Authority re: SHIP program
29. Other Commission Action
*a) Discussion of court reporter re: minutes
30. Adjournment
8/5/93
3
'iU c. ;
10/1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and Commissioners
Michael 1. Wrig~ty Manager
Naming/Renaming of Parks
SUBJECT:
COPIES:
Parks and Recreation Board Members
Ream Wilson, Parks and Recreation Director
Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk
DATE:
September 2, 1993
The following is being proposed in order to address the immediate questions of renaming
. Plaza Park and Wood Valley, as well as, future requests for naming and/or renaming park facilities.
1. The Parks and Recreation Board and staff will review the current resolution regarding
the naming of park facilities to determine what, if any, changes need to be made.
2. Recommended changes will be forwarded to the Commission.
3. Applications for naming/renaming park facilities will be evaluated based on the criteria
approved by the Commission.
4. Applications for naming/renaming of facilities will be heard at a public hearing before
the Parks and Recreation Board.
5. Notice of the public hearing and the proposed name will be by a display ad in the
newspaper, as well as, a large sign posted at the facility.
6. The Parks and Recreation Board will forward their recommendation to the Commission.
7. The Commission will take final action regarding the proposed name.
The possibility of doing a mail survey was discussed and the Parks and Recreation Board
approved of such a procedure. However, due to questions regarding how to determine to whom the
survey should be sent, such as residents vs. property owners; users vs. non-users, staff felt the
proposed process would be the most equitable.
Please let me know if this procedure meets with your approval. The Plaza Park and Wood
Valley issues are on hold until a new procedure can be established.
r " ! ,-... D
R ....e C JC,.> "
SEP 2 9 1993
CiTY CLERK DEPT.
DREW AND PLAZA PARK
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Dear Homeowner,
IT'S OFFICIALl
Homeowners in Drew Park and Plaza Park Subdivisions have
come together and formed the DREW AND PLAZA PARK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIA'l:10N, INe. All homeo.n.ars who O\lh property in Drew
or Plaza Park Subdivisions are encouraged to join the
association and make your voice heard.
The formation of this association will greatly benefit our
area and help us to present a unified voice to address our
common goals and problems. Many other areas in the city have
adopted such associations, and have greatly improved thier
image and ability to get things done, as well as increase
thier property values.
Our first meeting will be: MONDAY, OCTOBER 11,1993 at 7pm,
and will be held at:The Faith Christian Church, 303 North
Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater. Items on the agenda will include:
1. discussion of Bylaws, 2. discussion of upcoming election
and nomination of officers, 3. discussion of name change of
Plaza Park (see seperate page)
Many members have made a founding donation of $25.00 to help
cover the legal and other costs of setting up this association.
Any donation would be greatly appreciated. Checks should be
made payable to: DREW AND PLAZA PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,INC.
Any questions should be directed t.o:DAVID GRICE (813) 443-0737
or DUDLEY RICHARDSON (813) 447-0962 or MICHAEL QUINTIN 531-4055.
As the saying goes, THERE IS POWER IN NUMBERS". YOU can make
all the differance. Please complete and return your application
today to: DREW AND PLAZA PARK HOA, INC.
P.O. BOX 714
CLEARWATER, FL 34617
Sincerely,
REF it:
APPLICATION FOR MEMDERSHIP
DREW AND PLAZA PARK HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.
I/WE, Owner(s) of
address
in DREW PARK/PLAZA PARK (circle one) SUBDIVISION, desire to
apply for membership in DREW and PLAZA PARI\ IImmOWNEHS
ASSOCIATION, INC., as a founding member.
-
NAME
CO-OWNER
MAILING ADDRESS
lA,
~.
TELEPHONE
DAY
EVENING
signature:
OPTIONAL INFORMATION
OCCUPATION:
LIST ANY SPECIAL TALENTS OR INTERESTS WHICII COULD BE OF
BENEFIT TO THE ASSOCIATION:
DO YOU PLAN TO BE AN ACTIVE OR INACTIVE____MEMDER?
IF ACTIVE WOULD YOU ACCEPT A NOMINl\'l'ION '1'0 TilE BOARD
OR APPOINTMENT TO A COMMITTEE ?
CHECK~TYEE_OF PROPERTY OWNED:OWNER OCC.
COMMERCIAL, BUSINESS ,OTHER
,RENTAL
,Vl\CAN'L'
PLEASE RE'rURN TO:Drew and Plaza Parle II.O.A., IIIc.
P.O. BOX 714
CLEARWATER, FL 34617
OFFICE USE ONLY
Received by:
Legal desc:
Founding Donation:$
date:
# of members
CHANGING THE NAME OF PLAZA PARK
Park renamed for victim in dnlg incident
CLEARWATER - A park In the North Greenwood neighborhood
is being renamed the Lamar O'Byron Ford Memorial Park. The
park is to serve as a memorial to children who have died in the
area in violence related to drug trlJfficking. Late Thursday night, .
I', the City Commission unanimously approved a resolution to give
the park - known before as PlaZa Park - the new name. The
I commission also directed staff to place a plaque in the park
I listing names of young victims provided by the North Greenwood
Association. Muhammad Abdur-Rahim, the association's '. ':. ,'. .
I historian, said the park's renaming is part of an effort to improve' . ,
! the area, generally bordered by North Greenwood Avenue, Vine ....: I
. . j
Avenue, Jones Street and Plaza Street. Lamar Ford was a . .. ,
, ,. I
3-year:(lld boy killed in 1991 by a hlt-ando.run driv,er J{1 what.. ;.; . '
; : authorities called a drug deal gone bad. "The boy was playing In
his grandparents' front yard, near the park, when h~ Vias. killed.
';"4 . .
On August 7, 1993
This is the article that appeared
in the St. Pete Times telling of
the name change.
<
As concerned homeowners we went before the Clearwater City
Commission at thier next meeting, August 19, 1993 and asked
them to reverse thier decision for the foll~wing reasons.
The FIRST ISSUE was one of NOTICE. The name of the park was
changed without notice to property owners of the subdivision
where the park is located. This issue goes far beyond "Plaza
Park" and was brought before the commission in order for the
city to establish a better pOlicy regarding such matters in
the future. If proper notice had been served, ALL parties
involved would have had a chance to speak to the issue before
a decision was made by the commission, a decision that was
based on imput from people who do not own property in the
subdivision around the park. This was clearly a serious flaw
in city policy which needed to be addressed.
The SECOND ISSUE was one of WORDING. Many homeowners of the
PLAZA PARK SUBDIVISION feel the words "PLAZA PARK" should not
be left out of any new name since the entire subdivision is
called ~PLAZA PARK SUBDIVISION" Also using the words "drug
related activity, etc. would only serve to cast a negative
stigma on the area. This is the very image we are trying
to overcome at Plaza Park.
This issue has caused the commission to ask the Parks &
Recreation Department to establish new criteria for the
renaming of parks within the city. The PLAZA PARK issue
will come before the board in the near future for a vote
on the name change.
Your opinion as a member of the homeowners association is a
valuable asset and important to your homeowners association
and community. Please plan to attend and make your voice
heard.
,.
: ~rs~ __3~:_~
' ,'21. !
ISO 14~-
o (') 4-
on . (')
<~ 8~
.-------, ~
Z 9' .
<( ISO I ..
:i S SEABOARD
>-
U') ..?DO I ,
Z · · ·
on . "' .
Z ~fQ IS. 14. 13
W . . .
a.
"3 ')4 QJ ~
I I,.,=,
. ',..; C I ~
11501 ~ ~ ~
~I < l~
o
..
IZDO 1
J ,
i ,
'2, u.
.
I
,
I I/')
JOI9~
o
o 01
o -
3=
- Z S
W
UJ
a:
~
~
0 0_
::
~
0 0
on ..
~
o
0
~
:'O~ 1
. 3
13. 14 99
I '"
. ~
."
. .
100'
0 58
..
. ,lQQ
Q' 1ft
r It'"
WI I '"
~7! .. 911~
8"
I ,'"
I
4
II 12
5 lit
~
6 I 50 sol
140
STREET '"
'"
1~ ,100 ~
I I
I I I ~
13 I I IOI9~ ~
I .
I ,
'.
I
n
I ~~ I
"'"'~
!:l.Q.
I
12' II to
",I
~,
I
'100
o
'"
CI9)
I l$Q'
, 10 II!
. ~~
13 I ~Z , lJ~
1 I:!
I I
. ! 5 i 6 ' "/ ' 8
"I I I :
SOI50~~ I,
STREET
I: 21 J
=:: I
-0 : TOO so
I
9 '10
I..
I :!
I
18
I II)
I ..
, - s.i
'rOO
~
u
'!!
84
',~
~
DREW
5EP 03 '93 16=22
P.2
C1'I'Y OF CT~" 'RW ATER
P.O. BOX 4748
CLliAItWATBR, F.I..OPIDA 34618-4748
L(O d.
City CommiRfOn.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Mana&cr
DAT.B:
COPIES:
SUBl'BCT:
September 3. 1993
RROM:
Sevi1leI2D.m Development
0D0 of the things that wu DOt btoupt up at tile meetina was tbat \lDdor oUt c=ent City
Ord;"lJ'lca. Developers of large tracts orland owe the City land and mouy for park recreaticm~
Wbh this dcwdopment, whatlMr th= maximum amount of land is &va.iIab1e to tho City. I would
like to see a part-like setting developed for the residenw of Seville. I would lib it to be a
pathway leadins to the Bay as the land. '!'bat pathway can be lined wi!h Gas Lights, and tba
area at tbe ky could havo & couple of l)icnic benches. This area should be large eDOUP so that
peoplo can come from tho Scvill~ CXlID.plex and enjoy thcmJClVDS U the &yaidc.
Also. 1be danler of the dderiy people crossinl the Sl:RlIt to their Recreadcn. Ccntar was brollJht
up. I woul.cl sugest that we reqaire .. atop sip acin, bCltb directions, and a crosswalk path, so
tbat residents auto'1latlCBlly can set across tho street that will be Iroatly lncteased in trame, 10
~ U1.oy can safely arrive Ii tho rccrcatioa center.
-.
Furtber, it has been d.iscussed widely about the potent1a1 clamaie to trees thal are supposed to
be saved.. I would lib to .. to it that the City POIeater clearly identify each and svery tree that
is supp0a04 to be sa~ed. ancl whether or no' tho CODStnlction alto IIloinl to destroy the tUtur:e
Me of that tree. If it i& dotermined tha.t thoso trees arc in jeopardy. then 1hete should be major
sctooOff aaainst tbat pOtcD.tial damaae. We should not allow any buildini to b= bunt into the drip
line area of a. tree, or even clo3e to the dr.i.p line 8leL 11lat Js the Porester's job to identify t aud
I want to make sure that this plQject bas the closest cnviroAmeAtallCtUtm)' duri.ni tbe buildinJ"
project, and .clurln& tho final planning proaess before pcrmit$ are issued to ILJUUlee mazimum.
lurvivabDlty of the en.v1n:mmcDtaUy sensitive trees that ate planned to mnaiA.
1 woulcl also suaelt letting a copy of the Tree 0rdJnaJu:e in tho City otTampa aDd its ~o.tnmg
County. I understand ll1OI'C trees ate capable of being saved by their Ordina.nce tbarL our
Ord;t18~ee, and I would like to see a comparison between the two Qrtfinancos. Thank you.
FAT/sr
'-/(J t,~
""
CITY OF CLEARWATER
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4748
City Commission
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
Mayor, Commissioners, City Manager
Fred A. Thomas, co.m. ~~~C?ner;}
August 2, 1993 /4'4 f
Citizen V olunteersi/':/ Z ~i'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I fully understand the intent of the Commission of having Clearwater citizens as their volunteers
on their Boards. I share with you a recent note from an active citizen, who lives in Belleair,
and works in Clearwater and owns property in Clearwater.
In his note he states that he pays $85,000 a year in taxes in the City of Clearwater. He feels
left out that he cannot participate in Clearwater government because he lives in Belleair. I am
sure a lot of people feel that way, because it has been expressed to me by many. I fully
understand this issue has already been resolved by a prior Commission Meeting, but at some
point in the future, I request that it be reopened for additional analysis. There are a lot of great
people in our surrounding area that work in Clearwater and that own property in Clearwater that
would like to have active roles in the Clearwater government, especially in the advisory arena,
and our policy forbids that.
I support the majority rule and will continue to do so. However, I think we should always
review our decisions when we have the ability for change.
Thank you.
/1~
{ /
1ry
~
GEORGE L. l\1ALLOR Y
PrPsidf'111
.
---
(:Iass "'\"(;1'111",,1 ('''1111,It I,,'
1,...t:isll'lI.d \ III't~:,I':" Il, "L"J
Hq~i"II'II'd HI'''' 1".;1.",' 111"\ '"
Hqdst"II.d S"IIII it\ S,d"'I11,'"
Cl'ltilil.d HI';,I Est;ltl' ,\!,!""j"'1
C:l'rlilil'd (:01111111'11 iallll\ I"ll1l1'l1l \1,.,,,1,,,
N"tinnal Associ at iOIl III "~..,, I 'otIC
Cl'rtilil'd Plll!,l'rl\" \1.111.1':"1
.-~-
TIle Edgewater6roup
11i5 S, Fort Harrison Ave.
Po. Ro'( 717. Clearwater, Florida 34617
TrI"phone: (813) 443-0455
Fax: (813) 442-8519
Ed~ew8ter Investments
Erf~"w8ter Century Really, Inc.
ErI~ew8ter Construction, Inc.
Ed~ew8tcr Century Mortgage Corporation
July 2, 1993
Fred A. Thomas
P. o. Box 6025
Clearwater, Florida 34618
Dear Fred:
I wish to acknowledge receipt of your letter, dated June 22, 1993, enclosing a
City Volunteer Sheet. Being a resident of Belleair, I am not qualified for
Clearwater Advisory Boards even though I pay real estate taxes on Clearwater
property of about $85,000 per year.
Thanks for ~ur consideration.
. cordi:
~ge L. H:110ry
GLM/lw
{:"ntr;lftors ;lIld Bllildlns Association of Pinellas COllnty. Florida Mortg"g'~ Brok,~rs Association. Instit"". of f{l'al hl.,tl \1,"":"""''''
":;,tj"I1;t! :\ssm ialion of Rp.illlors. National Association of Real Estate Appraisl!fs,Cprtifil'd COlllllwn:iallrl\'I'''tllH'ilt \\1-111111'1
SEP 08 '93 13:32
City Commission
P.4
L/Q
CITY OF CLEARWATER
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 346184748
:MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
DATE:
September 7, 1993
COPIES:
Mayor, Commissioners
SUBJECT:
Art Colony Signs
---......--------------....-.----------------------.....-----
Please make a point of removing the signs in the downtown Clearwater area directing people to
an Art Colony. I don't think there is an Art Colony there anymore, therefore they should be
removed. Thank you.
FAT/sr
-
-
I
SEP 08 '93 13:32
40-
CITY OF CLEARWATER d
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34618~
City Commission
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
SUBJECI':
September 7 t 1993
FROM:
DATE:
COPIES:
Mayor, Commissioners
Rare Environmentally
-----------------_._---------~--------------------
Would you please conduct a study on all land in the City of Clearwater that is considered to be
environmentally sensitive. that has yet to be developed. List that land in order of priority of
sensitivity to the environment, as well as potential pending future developments.
Look at land that is nece.liL.~ for the storm water runoff treatment program that is underway.
as well as land that is critical to the cleaning of our waters through mangrove growth
opportunity. Look at land that is loaded with rare species of trees.
Also, bring forward a list of all funds available for the acquisition of this land that has been set
aside by various non-profit agencies throughout the country. lilce that brought forward in the
debate on the ZOM development. Also. any agencies that the Federal and State iovemment that
provide funds for purchases of the same type of land.
I would suggest that you use county. state and federal agencies and non-profit agencies
throughout the land to help cooperate in this project, so as to be able to accomplish it in the
shortest amount of time, with the least amount of tie-up of City staff time. I would assume that
this would take mare than 8 hours to accomplish and therefore. the 8 hour rule must be invoked,
and therefore must be put before the City Commission for approval.
lhis Commissioner does not want to face another ZOM development, without first having all
of the knowledge and all of the facts well in advance of what properties are endangered
throughout our City, and then be put into a comer where he has no choice but to vote for the
development. If this property had been cited prior to the developer bringing it forward, and it
had been designated as such, the City could have had better and stronger ordinances on
environmentally sensitive land. We should look: at having ordinances on environmentally
sensitive land, as well as general ordinances. Thank you.
FAT/sr
SEP 01 '93 16:59
P.3
Yo/(.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
P.O. BOX 4.748
CLEARWATER., FLORIDA 346184748
City Commission
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor, Commissioners, City Manager
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Fred A. Thomas, Commissione..v-:~
September 1, 1993
Wamr Treatment
------_.....-------------~------------------------------
During a recent meeting with Bill Baker in attendance, we were discussing how to have fresh
water supplies for the City of Clearwater. During that conversation, it was brought up that the
fresh water effluent that is being put into Tampa Bay, is a possible source of fresh water -
through the conversion, first.of making it blackish water, and then using a revcrse-osmosis plant
to convert it baok into potable drinking water.
I don't know whether this is a valid thing that we should start studying, or whether we should
just be studyina building desalinization plants, etc.
A fresh water supply for the citWms of Clearwater is an issue that requires long-term planning.
It should be done in cooperation with the County and with Swiftmud, but I believe the City of
Clearwater has the responsibility to its citizens to not sit idly by, waiting for the County or
Switfmud to see to it we have plenty of drinking water.
I would like the City Commission to develop an Ad Hoc Committee to study allleve1s ot this
prOblem and bring to the Commission possible solutions. I understand that former
Commissioner Lee Regulski is interested in this issue, and also citizen activist, Roy May. There
are, I am sure, some other citizens who are interested in this issue. I would like this Committee
to be composed of five citizens, one from each of the Commissioners and the Mayor as their
representatives. Please put on the Agenda the creation of such a Committee, and then we can
determine whether or not there is support for this issue.
FAT/sr
,
!fo
L-
CITY OF CLEARWATER
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4748
City Commission
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
DATE:
COPIES :
Fred A. Thomas, Commissioner
SUBJECT:
Public Libraries
September 9, 1993
Mayor, Commissioners
----------------....-------------------..------
Have we ever established a polley where there is a maximum number of items one individual
may check out at a time, and that there is a maximum number of items that they can have totally
checked out at anyone given time?
In reviewing the circulation list, it shows some abuse. That abuse can be easily corrected by
creating a polley for what can be checked out; what period of time it can be chc::cked out for;
how many items can be checked out at a given time, and how many total items can that
individual have at a given time. That would keep them from going every other day to check out
another item until they have 100 items checked out and in their possession.
I believe this should be discussed from a policy point of view by the Commission. Please add
to the Agenda.
FAT/sr
v'd
VV:80 86. 01 d3S
"
C I T Y 0 F C LEA R W ATE R
Interdepartmental Correspondence
To:
Michael J. Wright, City Manager
From:
Arlita Hallam, Library Director
copies:
Date:
September 13, 1993
Subject:
Maximum items circulated on a library card
The Clearwater Public Library System has not had a
limit on the number of library materials which could be
checked out on one library card for, at least, the last
twenty years. Some of the staff seem to remember a limit
of four books on a subject in the early 1970's.
We surveyed the surrounding public libraries and
found the following results:
Dunedin:
Gulf Beaches:
Gulfport:
Hernando County:
Largo:
Manatee County:
New Port Richey:
Oldsmar:
Palm Harbor:
Pasco County:
Pinellas Park:
No limit
No limit
No limit
15
30-35 (nothing in writing)
No limit
No limit
No limit
10
$1,000 worth of materials
24 (based upon number of
lines on computer screen)
7
No limit
No limit
No limit
No limit
Safety Harbor:
st. Petersburg:
st. Petersburg Beach:
Tampa-Hillsborough County:
Tarpon springs:
Clearwater does limit to six the number of videos
checked out on a card and to two the number of art
prints. other libraries have similar policies for
specific items (new books, aUdio-prints, large-print,
items on a juvenile card).
As the attached memo of september 2 shows, there are
only six people who have over fifty materials checked out.
j
"
C I T Y 0 F C LEA R W ATE R
Interdepartmental Correspondence
To:
Michael J. Wright, City Manager
From:
Arlita Hallam, Library Director
Copies:
Date:
September 2, 1993
Subject:
Commissioner Thomas' request for circulation
statistics
At Tuesday's budget session, Commission Thomas again
requested statistics on how frequently individuals check
out library materials. For confidentiality purposes, we
do not keep materials records tied to individual library
customers after the materials are returned; therefore,
statistics representing library usage over time are not
available.
Perhaps his concerns can be addressed, though, with
the attached data, which looked at all materials which
were out on patron cards on a given date. We ran a
statistical analysis on September 1, 1993 (a "slow" time
of year), which showed that, on that date, 54,249 library
materials were checked out on 17,284 library cards (an
average of 3.14 per borrower.
Of that 17,284 library patrons, 151 had more than 25
i terns checked out on their cards. Of that 151 "large
users", 118 were Clearwater residents, 23 were non-
residents, five were city employees, two were temporary
residents, and three were internal library codes.
A further breakdown showed that only one customer
had more than 100 items checked out at this time. This
person was a Clearwater resident, a school teacher, and
the books were children's materials checked out from the
Main Library.
Five customers had 50-99 items checked out at one
time. Four were school teachers who had checked out
children's materials from the Main, Countryside, and East
Branches. The other was a Clearwater nursing home, which
is served by our Red Cross volunteers.
Also included in the 25-49 category are some library
internal use cards (storage, mending, processing) and
some "dead" files which are patrons who had long overdue
books when the computer system was implemented in 1985.
Perhaps a more reliable indicator of potential non-
resident usage if/when Clearwater joins the Pinellas
Public Library Cooperative will be a statistical analysis
of the circulation patterns of those surrounding
libraries which are co-op members. I am now compiling
that report and will have it ready for the Budget
Advisory Committee's meeting on September 30.
ITEMS IN CIRCULATION ON 9/1/93
# of # of Branch Borrower Material
items customers used category type
100 + 1 Main Resident Juvenile
50-99 5 Main-2 Res. 3 Juv. 4
C'side-1 Non-res 1 Lgprnt 1
East-2 Spec. 1
25-49 145 Main- 52 Res. 114 All
Beach- 1 Nonres 22
C'side-27 Temp. 2
East- 57 Emp l. 5
N.G.- 8 Spec. 2
SUMMARY DATA
# of # of Branch Borrower Material
items customers used category type
25+ 151 Main 55 Res. 118 All
Beach 1 Nonres 23
C'side 28 Temp. 2
East 59 Empl. 5
N.G. 8 Spec. 3
,
40
I~ ..
CITY OF CLEARWATER
P. O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34618-4748
Ci ty Commission
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Michael J. Wright, City Manager
FROM:
Fred A. Thomas, Commissioner
/'
Mayor, Commission /~
I
COPIES:
DATE:
September 13, 1993
RE: Parking Around the Pinellas County Utilities Building
************************************************************************
Attached is a letter that I received from Fred E. Marquis, County
Administrator concerning the above referenced topic. Please agenda this
topic for an upcoming Commission Meeting.
/
/
.
PINELLAS
c () UN,]' Y, F LOR I n A
PHONE 18 I 31 462-3485 . 315 COURT STREET. CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34616
"'UD E. M"'"QUI.
COUNTY.4D...I""",,.4.TO"
t:tlfif:i TO:
COMM\SSION
PRSC
DGte SEP 07 1993
CITY CLffil\
August 31. 1993
Co...!saioner Fred A. Thomas oJ, mo.,-\O..- ~rul
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater. Florida 34618-4748
Subject: Parking Around the Pine11as County Utilities Building
Your Letter of August 18. 1993
Dear Fred:
As you know, Pinel1as County has been a long time employer in the downtown
Clearwater area. Parking for the public users of County Government and
Court facilities and employees has always been of primary importance to
the County. The County Water and Sewer Systems (Utilities). as enterprise
activities of County Government, purchased the Fortune Bank Building with
the plan that County parking policies would be extended to this new
property. The Utilities own the building and lease space to other County
departments for necessary County services. The Utilities have sought to
carry out our parking policies for County citizens who need to visit the
building for County services and for our employees. In developing its
parking facilities. the Utilities have worked with their neighbors in the
area to facilitate their use of the parking lots during non-business hours
and worked to produce an attractive improvement to the downtown area. The
bP.Rt eXRmple of this is the Utilities Building parkin~ lot on the east
side of Ft. Harrison Avenue, which is the most attractive parking facility
in Clearwater.
The Utilities have for a long time shared parking facilities with the
large churches in the downtown area. The churches have parking lots that
are vacant during a large part of the work day and the Utilities have
parking lots that are vacant after business hours and on the weekends.
When the Utilities relocated to the new building. they entered formal
agreements with the churches stating the time when each would share the
other parties parking fac 11 ities. In addi tion. Peace Memorial provided
spnce for the Water System to install an after-hours payment drop box on
Church property. The Utilities are now completing construction
improvements to the parking lots for both parking control and
Commissioner Fred A. Thomas
September 1, 1993
Page 2
beautification. Since they moved to the new building in February, 1993,
they have made the parking lots adjacent to the Utilities Building
available to the publ ic durillR those hours when they are not being used by
either the churches or for conduct of County business. The Utilities'
parking facilities adjacent to the Utilities Building will continue to be
available to the public after-hours when not needed by Calvary, Baptist
Church. The lot on the east side of Ft. Harrison Avenue will be used
exclusively by the Utilities and Peace Memorial Presbyterian Church. The
attached parking guide has been prepared for distribution to local
commercial establishments desiring to use the Utilities parking lots.
Fourteen spaces, outside of the gated lots, are available for public
parking during non-working hours all week long.
I would also point out that there are large public parking lots in front
of Clearwater City Hall and north of the old Maas Brothers building that
are within one half block of the commercial area on Cleveland that desires
to use the Utilities' parking lot. While this may not provide all of the
parking desired by the downtown merchants, I believe the County is acting
in a responsible manner to do its part to be a contributing employer in
the downtown area. Certainly the Utili ties are doing their part in the
beautification of the building and parking area, and in sharing parking
with their neighbors, to be responsible citizens of the downtown community.
cc: Mayor Rita Garvey
Pinellas County Board of
County Commissioners
.
rlliELLAS COUNIYJlTILITIES
P ARKlNG LOT POLICY
l'inellas County Utilities has worked with the Calvary Baptist Church and the Peace Memorial
PresbytNian Church to jointly share our respective parking lots for the benefit of our customers,
tenants, and employees, and the churches' parishioners. The Utilities' gated (reserved) parking lots
on the west side of Ft. Harrison A venue will be. open to the public at all other times.
p.m.
to
6:30 3.m.
I1QI110,
1.
Between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (excluding holidays),
the parking lots wiIJ be for use' by Utililies Building customers and employees only. The 14
spaces located on the left from the Ft. Harrison Avenue entrance are available to the public
for parking at all other times.
2.
I
The Utilities' parking lot on lIie cast side of Ft. Harrison Avenue, situated between Park and
Pierce, will be used by Utilities Building employees and Peace Memorial Presbyterian
Church exclusively.
On Tuesdays and Wednesdays, between the hours of 5:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., and on
Sundays, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., the parking lots adjacent to the
Utilities Building will be available for use by the Calvary Baptist ChurCl\.
On the fourth Thursday of each month, between the hours of 5:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., the
north parking lot adjacent to the Utilities Building will be used by the Pinellas County
Planning Department's Citizen Advisory Committee.
In the event that tenants of the Utilities Building, their boards, committees, coundls or the
Calvary Baptist Church have parking requirements outside of the scheduled times above,
these requirements will take precedent Over an open parking lot. If this occurs, proper
notification will be placed at the entrances of the lots.
Other than those times listed above, both parking lots adjacent to the Utilities Building will
be open to the general public.
Overnight parking is discouraged. Any unauthorized vehicles occupying spaces in these
parking lots during the restricted lime periods will be towed at the owners' expense.
Parking will be at the public's risk. The County will not accept responsibility for public use
of these lots. The County reserves the right to change this policy at any time.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
FOR PUBLIC USE
Note: Exception (see 5 above)
ALL
DAY
p.m.
to
6:30 3.m.
PUBLIC
except I.lh
Thurs. of
the Month
Sunday
PARKING
10:00 p.m.
to
6:30 a.m.
10:00 p.m.
to
6:30 8.m.
FOR PUBLIC USE
.
/
1
. ..Y.
OSC.EOLA
A.V E.
z
0 ft\
c )IJ
tJ ~ 4 ~
c - ]: Il
- r
r - 11
0 ~ r (
! PI 0 m-
p J} ~ 0
>
(
, r
tlI
.(
ALL(.Y w^'< i
.,
(") 1..
-0 ?E~C.e: IV\ E. "'-"0 "'t I..... '- C
V)
C"'VRC.~ -t lC?ESE:R.vE.O
rn 0 .
~ { @
rn
() ;IQ .
ITI t/l
, 1r
c
~
(" { RE'SER'lED
~
m
,/I
,. 1 .
K.ARR'~O)....J
AVE
40 n-
GREATER CLEARWATER
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Executive Committee
R Carllm WanI
Chairman. of IN Board
Phil M. HendClSm
Cltainnafl.Elect
Stephen R. Fowler
VC Economic!
BusiMSS Developwuflt
Ann M. Wilkins
VC Govenurufltal AjJairsl
Educatiofl Developwulll
Iulie F. Nichols
VC Tourism
Iohn P. Cmnelly
VC Membership
Charles D. Riggs, III
Treasurer
Kenneth G. Hamilton
/mwudiate Past Chairman
Julius I. Zschau
Legal COUIISel
Pctcr Woodham
Pruitkflt, CEO
Board of Directors
Marie N. Abdo
Daniel M. Andriso
Lee E. Arnold, Jr.
Charles E. Bchr
RobeJtBickcrstaffe
Alan C. Bomstein
David H. Bonk
Frank A. Brock, III
RobeJt A. Burwell
RobeJt W. Byrd
Ianice B. Casc
RobeJt N. "Pete" Crawford DDS
Edward C. Droste
Dennis E. Eckel
Michael W. Fields
RobeJt E. Heilman, Ir.
Roland S. Kennedy
Pctcr W. Krcuziger
Gany R. Lubi
Daniel T. Mann
Edward Mazur, Ir.
Roy I. McCraw, Jr.
J. H. McCurtain, Ir.
Frank V. Murphy, III
David C. Rijos
Madeline M Robinsm
lack E. Russell, Ir.
Talmadge Rutledge
Daryl I. Seatm
Don L. Seatm
Elizabeth Sha w
Ronald W. Swan
David P. Stme
Tammy Teston
James Warner
Helen A. Whc:clis
Julius I. Zschau
TAMPA BAY
~~
128 N. OSCEOLA AVE. P.O. BOX 2457. CLEARWATER. Fl34617. 81~/461.0011 . FAX 81~/449.2889
'"
,: ::.~;
August 26, 1993
{'rl'!'<"ltl,C'S'O
..... UJ;;:~~ i -:, ! i\
f'RES3
D.:te SEP 1 3 193.)
Rita Garvey, Mayor
City of Clearwater
P.o. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618
CITy C '0.
j j Ltlii\
Dear Mayor Garvey:
Your Clearwater/Pinellas Suncoast Welcome Center is
approaching its 6th year anniversary in October. If you
recall, in addition to graciously lending your Chamber
funds to create the facility, the City helped landscape
the Welcome Center grounds.
The location of the Welcome Center essentially makes it
the gateway to Clearwater and it is often the first
contact our visitors and new residents have with our
community. While the high level of service and
hospitality they receive from our staff has improved over
the years, the high traffic and related abuse have taken
their tolls on the Welcome Center's grounds. Generally,
the area is beginning to look run down and doesn't
represent our city as well as it should.
In these days of water concerns, we would like the City to
consider assisting in the re-Iandscaping of the Welcome
Center using its low maintanence xeriscape landscaping.
Clearwater would make a better impression on its visitors
and its residents and both the City and your Chamber would
be making the proper and necessary statement regarding
water usage. If the city is unable to help in a major
way, a donation or trees and other low maintenance plants
would be appreciated.
Thank you for your serious consideration of this request
to continue to beautify our community along the Courtney
Campbell Causeway.
~;t-
~.~~lton Ward, Chairman
RECEIVED
SEP 1 3 1993
LfO
o.
City Manager
KEMORANDUK
DATE: September 10, 1993
TO: Mr. Michael wright, City Manager
ALL CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMISSIONERS
FROM: WINDING WOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
SUBJECT: COUNTRYSIDE DAY - SPRING OF 1994 - SECOND ANNUAL
This is an event to promote communi ty awareness wi th special
emphasis on the new Countryside Community Center. The event is to
be held at Misty Springs Park.
Mayor Garvey, Commissioner Fitzgerald, and Commissioner Berfield
attended our first. The approximate 600 attendees were delighted
with this event and hope to expand this to 3,000. There are 364
families encompassing the countryside area that requested an
interest in the Countryside Day Second Annual Event.
We are requesting $10,000 in order to fund this informative
community event that will promote and inform the entire community.
Your consideration in this matter is highly appreciated. If you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact:
John Wiser
Member
2701 Foxfire Court
Clearwater, Florida 34621
(813) 791-1026
(813) 791-6647
RECEI,TED
SEP 1 ? 1993
40
p,
FOSTER AND DAVIS
~ ~ce~ a/ ~ua>
City Man~gcr
555 FOURTH STREET NORTH
DAVID L. FOSTER
KENT W. DAVIS
D. WILLIAM FOSTER
ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701
813.822.2013
813.894.3261
F ACSIMlLE
813.823-2562
MAIL ADDRESS:
POST OFFICE BOX 2911, ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33731
September 16, 1993
Mr. Michael J. wright
City Manager - City of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748
Re: Fee Agreement between City of Clearwater and Snell
Isle Properties, Inc.
Dear Mr. Wright:
As you are aware, I have been retained by Frank Malowany, as
president of Snell Isle Properties, Inc., for the purpose of
consummating a fee agreement between the City of Clearwater and
Snell Isle Properties, Inc.
I have seen the minutes from the August 2, 1993, meeting of the
City Commission, and I believe that there was some confusion among
the Commission members as to the intent and purpose of said
Agreement. From the comments of Commissioner Thomas and
Commissioner Deegan, I am of the impression that the Commission
believed this Agreement to be some type of "exclusive" broker or
consultant agreement.
Mr. Malowany has no desire to be a consultant to the City of
Clearwater, nor does he expect to have an exclusive agreement with
the City of Clearwater to sell or lease said Haas property. ~k.
Malowany has been approached by certain out-of-state investor
groups / developers, who have expressed desire in developing a
significant parcel of real estate for retail and/or other
commercial uses. Presently, Mr. Malowany is checking sites of
coastal property throughout the State of Florida. However, the
Maas property fits the description and requirements of his "group",
and it happens to be in our own back yard. Quite simply, Mr.
Malowany has the desire and ability to introduce his investors to
the City of Clearwater, which could prove to be valuable to the
City of Clearwater. However, my client desires to be paid a fee
for his services. At the present time, this out-of-state group
Mr. Michael J. Wright
September 16, 1993
Page Two
knows nothing about the City of Clearwater, and they remain unaware
of the potential for development of the Maas property.
Under the "Fee Agreement", as previously proposed, the City remains
open to "talk with anyone having a proposal". So too, the City
could take one look at my client's investor group, and discard the
whole idea. However, should my client be the one to procure the
developer which is ultimately selected by the City of Clearwater to
develop the Maas real property, then my client should be entitled
to compensation. Mr. Malowany will not work for free, and I doubt
that this development group will become aware of the Maas site by
any other means. In any event, it is a "no risk - no lose"
proposition for the City of Clearwater.
The agreement, as previously submitted, was simply a proposal and
remains subject to some negotiation. I request that the City of
Clearwater revisit my client's proposal, and further request an
opportunity for my client to address the City Commission at an open
forum. Kindly advise.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter, and should you have
any questions or desire to discuss this matter further, then please
feel free to call me.
Very truly yours,
FOSTER AND DAVIS
"-
/~
D. William Foster
DWF/wh
Enclosure
cc: Snell Isle Properties, Inc.
SEP-22-1993 15:05 FROM CLW. CITY MANAGER
89/22/93 11: 14: UI
SENT ay;
~.
~-
...................
J. ,...CXICIIUl
TO
M=lYOR P.07
-> 913 4&2 &728 itayai' GtwVtIY
; 8-22-88 ,'1:0CAM ; 20228S2S52~
Pap: 2
VIA SUREFAXU' 2
. 40 Q.
THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS V
llSZom ~ NOmiWIST
~,D.C.20006
1'JU.III!RCN1 et02) 10,.$(1
DX cmz) --2&"
CU f'~~~ m:
GiJl'i!!IJ! i;::)HIUI\I
PRESS
Date SEP 2 2 'I~::iv
CITY CI.fffi\
URGENT! URGENTI URGENT!
TO:
fROM:
DAm:
THBMAYOR "'""~~
J. THOMAS COCHRANI BXBCUTIVB DIRBCI'OR
SBPr.EMBER 22, 1993
CDBG PUNDING LEVBLS
RB:
Senltor Brown pla to off.r 8D amendment thf8 8ftemocnl tel out the fuDdiDa
IMl of the CommuIdty Development Black Grant (CDOO) prosram by $100
mmJon. The U.s. Coaferenee Of Mayea ill utiDs that you mstUatety c.u
your SenalOrS and urp that they oppaIO tbo BrowD Amendmeat ana support
the &ndfn; lenI for CDOO 10 the VA-HUJ) bG1 paaoci by the
ApproprJatfou Committee.
Tho ~ ICWDI for CDHO in the ApproprJalioDl Committee bm 11 $4.4
bDlion. .
If ytl\1 haft my quest!om, pJeaae CIll Babette Penton of the Conference staff
at (202) 293-7330.
,....
j/~ :,
/'jl "
:;.;.--
t .J
/; ,;.. ..;
,-I'C /.
I"../(.c.~ / ~ ( ~. ..2./2L-/l'~
~'
---- ( ~ '-.
. ,
r
./
C CC
, 1
- l'-1. :', ,f~ ;., (
/ ?-" ~
-~.L~j ;: 'I (( ','-- t" ,.:-L""
J )~D )) ',-._A- :.~ r -: ,-,' ~" {-~" "p : c-/..i Ii " cf/.J?
V
YJ}~"
I
I' ,~
BUDGET ADVISORY COM:MITTEE
"'0 r.
September 9, 1993
Recommendations
At its regular meeting on September 9,1993, the Budget Advisory Committee
made the following recommendations to the Commission:
1. The Budget Advisory Committee recognizes that the budget is created
from week to week decisions made at City Commission meetings. The
budget document is merely a compilation of decisions and policy changes
made throughout the year.
The Budget Advisory Committee recommends that as new
programs are added and changes are made by the City Commission
to expend more funds, that these decisions have identified with
them the specific funding mechanism to be used to pay for these
additional costs. Examples are Commissioner salaries, the General
Accounting Office, and funding for the new City Hall.
2. The Budget Advisory Committee recognizes that some salary adjustment
is appropriate for the Commission, but feels that 2 1/2 times the present
salaries is exorbitant.
The Budget Advisory Com~ittee recommends that the subject of
the Commission salaries be assigned to the Charter Review
Committee next year with the recognition that an appropriate
adjustment be made with a provision for annual adjustments based
on the general salary adjustments that are provided to City
employees.
3. The Budget Advisory Committee recommends that before a final decision
is made regarding the construction of a new City Hall, that a report,
including a full analysis of the new City Hall operating costs and savings
to be provided from the existing facilities, be made available to the Budget
Advisory Committee and the public.
"