The URL can be used to link to this page

08/19/1999 ,: :, , ' ", .... '",' ',.' " "';' ",: ",'-,' ' , , '1, 'f' '. -'\'\ ,:." .-' ".' "", ,,'",,,' ,', ... " " ' , , < }. < . <. 1,., '. . ' !. . . .,,' .' Agenda: 8-19-99 0(')0 Co . , .... ,"; . ~.. , < .. ~.,', ,,' . .... " 0" . .....' , ." ,..J!'. ..,' ,'; I,' ,\ ')' , _ .. '.,' j "" . . . , , " . . ;. ~ ,': ~', , ,'~' " ~ ".: .:.' . . " ~,_,::~ " .. " ' ' ....., I "', . City Commission Meeting 8-19-99 note: 8-16-99 Preliminary (Worksession) Agenda and paperwork that was in package initially but then not continued onto Thursday's agenda is at the back of this agenda pack. 0007 , . " ,.~. ~, ~. J'~ I,"Y'. .~. ,'.. .' .... .... ',' ','~' ,',' \ I. ".." '...... , ....', ",'.: ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING Thursday, August 19, 1999 - 6:00 P.M. - Commission Chambers 1. Invocation - Rabbi Arthur Baseman, Temple S"Nai Israel. 2. Pledge of Allegiance - Mayor. 3. Service Awards - 5 awards presented. 4. Introductions and Awards a) Team of the Quarter - Fire - Letter of Appreciation & $15 check for each team member presented to The A-Shift, Fire Station 45. 5. Presentations a) Representative Leslie Waters - Legislative Report - Given. b) Recognize leadership Group - Recognized. 6. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting 8/5/99 - Approved as submitted. 7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda Tom Sehlhorst wished to provide comment when the Community Development Code is reviewed. Robert Aude, Clearwater Housing Authority, presented a check as payment in lieu of taxes. John Tassanari said the City should treat all citizens fairly and not discriminate against the poor. Anne Garris opposed private development on the bluff. Doua Pollard questioned access to the new bridge, opposed the roundabout, and said new beach nightclubs would attract adult tourists. Earlv Sorenson requested staff encourage SR 60 adult businesses to relocate to Code designated areas. O'Neal Jacob opposed development on the bluff and beach. Fred Thomas recommended the East and SPJC libraries merge to form the main library. John Doran spoke in support of the City Manager. PUBLIC HEARINGS Not Before 6:00 P.M. 8. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6429-99, #6430-99 & #6431-99 - Annexation, land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Suburban & LOR Zoning for jj{operty located at 2892 Union St., Sec. 32-28-16, M&B 43.06 (Larry & Marcella Wing (A99-11 )(PLD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 1 st reading. 8/19/99 1 \'~i.. , ,I'..".' ~-~i~~''''''',~. .:,,'1 r~",1 ,..:. ,....., 1,':'.. J ..~t ~,,",.' ~, ":......~_ I.~::~'" ~;..' ....' .:',' _' 1'''.': " ,~.,~, "',', ~ . '~'\" ...,"".'..' .... 9. Public Hearing &. First Reading Ords. #6432-99, #6433-99 & #6434-99 - Annexation, land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban & LMDR Zoning for property located at 2854 Saint John Dr., Virginia Groves Terrace 5th Add., Blk C, Lot 13 (Russell & Sydney Jacobs (A99-12)(PLD) ACTION: Approved. Ordinances passed 18t reading. 10. Public Hearing - proposed amendments to Clearwater Comprehensive Plan; approve sending to appropriate reviewing agencies (PLD) ACTION: Approved. 11. Public Hearing - Res. #99-38 - Relating to Community Revitalization; designating that portion of Clearwater Beach bounded by Mandalay on the East, the Mean High Water Line on the West, Baymont to the North and Papaya to the South, as a City of Clearwater Revital ization / Redevelopment Area (CA) ACTION: Approved. Resolution adopted. Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances 12. Ord. #6411-99 - Amendments to various sections of the Community Development Code ACTION: Ordinance adopted. 13. Ord. #6431-99 - Relating to Public Beaches; amending Sec. 22.21 to amend definition of "safe Bathing Limit" and to include definitions of "Public Beach" and "Sand Key Public Beach"; amending various other sections in Ch. 22 ACTION: Ordinance adopted. 14. Ord. #6438-99 - Relating to fines for illegally parking in a parking space designated for persons who have disabilities; amending Sec. 30.061 (7) to increase the penalty for violation of disabled permit only parking ACTION: Ordinance adopted. CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (Items #15-25) - Approved as submitted (less Items #15 (1 st title) and #21) The following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually. 15. Approval of Purchases per 7/20/99 memorandum: Central Parking Systems, extension, month to month parking system services at Clearwater Beach, ending 9/30/2000, est. $325,000 (PW) - APPROVED. Volt Sciences, Inc., extension, installateon of gas mains & services at various locations throughout gas system, 9/30/99-12/31/99, funding was approved 9/17/98 (GAS) Pinel/as County Solid Waste Management Department, solid waste disposal used by Parks and Recreation, 8/20/99-9/30/2000, est. $ 26,000 (QOL) 8/19/99 2 .., , : . ", " .' .' I '. . -f,' :.' . . ~ Jimmie's Wrecker Service, 2nd & Final extension, towin services, 11/1/99-10/31/2000, est. $55,000 (GSS) Genuine Parts Company, first extension, motor vehicle e uipment parts & services, 8/22/99- 9/21/2000, est. $850,000 (GSS) 16. Interlocal Agreement with Pinellas County for joint mana ement of an Economic Analysis for north central portion of City, commonly referred to as H rcules Industrial Area, $12,500 (EDI 17. Approve recommendations of Technical Review Committ e for allocation of Fiscal Year 1999- 2000 City of Clearwater Social Services Grants Program funds in the amount $65,000; approve proposed funding contract form (HM) 18. Authorize City Manager to renew one-year agreement wi h Pinellas County Sheriff's Department to provide latent fingerprint examination and related serv ces, as well as crime scene services including evidence and property storage, 10/1/99-9/30/2000, for $373,712.30 (POI 19. Addendum to Agreement with School Board of Pinellas ounty, continuation of School Resource Officer program for 1999-2000 school year at Clearwat r High School & Countryside High School (PO) 20. Lease Agreement with RSGN, Inc. as Lessor, for premis s located at 1217A N. Ft. Harrison Ave., (Old Clearwater Bay police substation) 10/1/99-9/30/20 2, at annual rental of $7,260 IPO) 21. Contract for Gulf to Bay Blvd. median landscaping & irri ation (Old Coachman Rd. to Belcher Rd. & westward) to Morelli Landscaping, Inc., $110,087.18 with option to continue with Phase 2 of project for not to exceed $85,877.82, for total of $195, 65 for both phases IPWI - APPROVED 22. Work Order with McKim & Creed for engineering service re Disinfection Facility Design - Northeast APC Facility, $119,000 (PWI 23. First Amendment to Harborview Center Management Ag eement, extending term with Globe Facilities Services, Inc., for 10/1/99-9/30/2002 (CM) 24. Authorize Settlement - Charles and Gloria Johnson v. Ci y of Clearwater (CA) 25. Confirm 9/9/99, 10:30 a.m. to 1 :30 p.m. to begin revie of Policies & Rules of Procedures OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANA ER REPORT 26. Update regarding Beach Entryway (Roundabout) Project eM) ACTION: Update given. 27. Amendment to Waiver Agreement with Charles and Ypa anti Alexiou, property owners at 7 Rockaway Street, and National Water Sports Inc., to ad a tow ride which seats 5 people (MRI ACTION: Approved. 28. Approve selection committee' s ranking of consultants ( Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe Architects, #3 - Tampa Bay McKee, #5 - Bitterli & Associates Architects, and #6 - engineering and financial analyses for two beach parkin scope of services and contract with top ranked firm (P ACTION: Approved; authorized. 1 - Parsons Engineering Science, #2 - ngineering, #4 - Camp, Dresser & cKim and Creed) for more detailed garages; authorize staff to negotiate a I 29. Amend project scope for Drew Street Widening project; approve transfer of $550,000 from S.R.60 Corridor Enhancement capital project to Drew S reet Widening capital project (PW) ACTION: Approved. 8/19/99 3 .' .. to. ~ " . .. I ~ ...'~. I '. \ '. ''1.' ,J ~ ' ". '. 30. Fire Task Force ACTION: Postponed 10 next meetinq. 31. Agreement with Siemon & Larsen, provide consulting services related to Downtown Request for Developer Qualifications (RFOQ) for "Bluff" area of downtown project, amount not to exceed $66,480 ACTION: Approved. 32 Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell and Dunbar, P,A., 3rd of 5 extensions, state lobbyist services, 10/1/99-9/30/2000, est. $55,000 (elK) ACTION: Approved. 33. Other Pending Matters - None. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS 34. City Attorney Items - None. 35. City Manager Verbal Reports - None. 36. Other Comm ission Action Hart said issues before the Commission prompt difficult decisions re long term benefits for the City. Johnson questioned if a response to Glen Johnson's letter was being prepared. Staff indicated it was. Johnson requested impact of new State homestead exemption for seniors. Hooper will provide updates re actions of new US 19 Task Force re intersections and median cuts. Clark reflected on the accusations directed at the Commission tonight. AunQst complimented the City Manager's Office and Legal Department for improved communications. AunQst said it is necessary for staff to follow the chain of comm and. 37. Adjournment - 10:24 p.m. 8/19/99 4 . " ' ,. . . -' ~;, :' . \ ,* -. ", . ~ .," . I' / .", ' ; Clearwater o Interoffic(! Cormspondenn- Sheet From: Mayor and Comm issioners Cyndie Goudeau, City Cler@ Michael J. Roberto, City Manager To: cc: Date: August 18, 1999 8/16/99 Work Session Follow up RE: In response to questions raised at the Work Session the following responses are provided in . agenda order: Item #15 - Purchasing - tne Pennington Law Firm extension for lobbyist services has been pulled from the purchasing memo and is now Item #32. Item #17 - Social Service Grants - the back up material is included in your agenda packet. The contracts incl ude a provision that the grants are subject to City Commission approval of the budget. Item #21 - Gulf to Bay Medians - the estimated future maintenance costs are $100,000 per year. Item #29 - Drew Street - the Corona school crossing will be moved 30 feet west and will have a pedestrian actuated signal. Item #31 - Siemon & Larsen Contract - the item for services re the Bluff RFDQ has been added. Item #32 - Penni ngton Law Firm lobbyist services - a memorandum from Pete Dunbar is attached to the item addressing the concerns raised at the work session. The City Attorney is identifying others to contact to provide services in case of a conflict. . "'. " '.' , .', ~: " :* I~ "', ,," . I . . , ... : ~.' . .~ ,I . -, ~ - " . . , , . , : . ....., ... ' . ..,:.'., - .. . _:........: . :. '.,. . .. " '. .., .' ..',' : .... . . .' .. .'. . . ......: . . .' ,'., '. ,: '.... .'" ': ." ... . '..' . " .:' , " . , .,'. - ,.. ."...., ..,',. ::.. ,.~,' .,.. ~..' .~ . ' . .' :" ,'b .. . " :.. ". '. ,'" " , ,'".." . . , '.. .. . \' , .' ~-~ Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: 8/16/99 SJ1 g/QQ SUBJ ECT IRECOMMENDA liON: SERVICE AWARDS o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The following employees be presented with service awards for their length of service in the employment of the City of Clearwater Public Works DCM/ACM BACKGROUND: 5 Years Walter E. Sarna Derick E. Blunt Thomas L. Wiggins Helen B. Goldschmidt Judith D. Horton Willie Porter Dimas R. Burgos Jerry R. Butler Tracey L. Davis Erick L. Swinton 10 Years Terrence B. Griggley Jeanette L. Paterkiewicz Sally L. Thomas Raymond R. Pelote 15 Years Gregory S. Turman Milza S. Barley III Ronald D. Whalen, Jr. Wadine B. Shawen Thomas A. Mudano R6vlewed by: Legal NA Budget NA Purchasing NA Risk Mgmt NA Info Tech Other Submitted by: City Mana er Printed on recycled paper 2/98 Public Works Public Works Parks & Rec Library Library Solid Waste Solid Waste Solid Waste Solid Waste Solid Waste 20 Years John A. Scacca Nancy J. Miller William L. Sara Donn R. Githens, Jr. Brian B. Baldwin Rowland E. Herald David P. Dopirak Dean Edwards Wallace L Green Jay M. Love Lowell E. Nickerson Lawrence R. B rowett Dennis A. Camara James Fogarty William B. Gillette William C. Watkins Mary C. Youngblood Pollee Pollee Police Police Fire Fire Fire Fire Fire Fire Fire Fire Fire Fire Fire Fire Solid Waste Parks & Ree Public Works City Clerk Public Comm. & Mktg. Public Works Gas Solid Waste Development Svcs. Planning & Dev. 25 Years James M. Lewin, Sr. Gas NA NA Originating Dept: I-lumen Resources User Oept. Funding Source: Coptiol Improvement Operating Current Fiscal Year Costs Total NA Attachments Other Appropriation Code: o None Rev. r . . .....~.'. ...... .......... . '.... ".,~'. ..... .~.:' :..::.......... ..:~:' '.':..., '., .. ~ '1' . \ . ~ ,_ ',' , . . ' " I, / 1 t. I i-l.' ,. , ; I , I I I i I \ i , 5q re Florida House of Representatives Leslie Waters State Representative District 51 11350 66th Street North, Suite 107 Largo, FL 33773.5524 Phone: (727) 545.6421 Fax: (727) 545.6423 l , ! 402 South Monroe Street 1202 The Capitol Tallahassec, Florida 32399-1300 Phone: (850) 488-6197 Representative Leslie Waters ,- 1999 Legislative Rankings . The Florida Chamber of Commerce Selected as one of the Florida Chamber's Top 40 legislators of the 1999 Legislative Session. . Associated Industries of Florida - Tied for 5th most Effective State Representative of the 1999 Legislative Session. . Florida Insurance Council Received a 1999 Freshman Legislator of the Year Award. . Christian Coalition of Florida 100 percent Pro-Family voting record (Based on the voting results of 10 Bills) Committccs: Colleges & Universitics/ Finance & Taxation/Insurance, Vice Chair/ Water & Rcsource Management , ''''.'' '- .. ~..:. ,.',: .... . ',,' . I. . .. ", . , .', /." . r,.. t..:' 1.: 1'"". ,', ~ .',' . \ ~' ,;,~.;I /' ':. .. y ,,' " ~. '. . ~ ., ", . : ' . f Lt :1- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: R Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: August 19, 1999 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDA TION: · Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendments for 2890 &2892 Union Street; Owners: Larry B. Wing & Marcella M. Wing. MOTION: Approve the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Suburban and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Low Density Residential (LOR) for M&B 43/06, and pass Ordinances No. 6429- 99,6430-99 & 6431-99 on first reading. (A99-11) 1&1 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: . The property owners have requested this annexation in order to receive City water and sewer service. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Suburban and the propo.J.ed zoning is Low Density Residential (LDR). Upon annexation, the owners propose to subdivide the "subject site into six low density residential lots per attached subdivision plat map. . Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Clearwater and capacity for the project is available for both utilities. The closest water and sewer lines are immediately adjacent to the property in the Union Street right-of-way. . The proposed annexation and proposed use are consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. . The proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. It The Community Development Board at their regularly scheduled public hearing meeting of July 20, 1999 unanimously recommended approval of the annexation, comprehensive plan category of Residential Suburban, and Low Density Residential (LOR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt Jl~:/*- N/A N/A N/A Info Srvc Originating Dept: /J..Ill1 > Costs PLANNING AND ~ Total DEVELOPMENT SERVICES User Dept. Cu rrent FY Funding Source: CI OP Other Reviewed by: Legal Public Works DCM/ACM Other Attachments STAFF REPORT AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF SITE & VICINITY LAND USE PLAN MAP ZONING MAP UTllITI ES MAP ORDINANCES NO. 6429-99, 6430-99 & 6431-99 SUBDIVISION PLAT MAP Submitted by: City Manager Printed on recycled paper -I..- \1 o None A ro riation Code: Rev. 2/98 . .- . ~... .:::~.) ~:',<. ',~", .:. ... . '.., ...... ,.:. . · .... '. .....:. <,::, ~:'.' ;:~" '},.:.., .'",' .' , .;:,.L':'\ ",.:\. .~. '.. '.. - .:: : "'~ . J I " 1 . . . , . : . ~' " , ...,. , . '. ~. l '. . ,.. ' f t P L-b i ){ COB Meeting Date: July 20, 1999 Case No. A99-11 Agenda Item: ill.A. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNERS: Larry B. Wing & Marcella M. Wing REPRESENTATIVE: Vince CorbittJLand Precision Corporation LOCATION: 2890 & 2892 Union Street, approximately 490 feet east of Soule Road and 90 feet south of Chancery Lane REQUEST: To annex the property into the City of Clearwater at the request of the property owners and approve the appropriate City land use plan category and zoning district. SITE INFORMA nON PROPERTY SIZE: 152,460 square feet or 3.5acres Dimensions of property: Variable lot width, 190 feet on Union Street & 330 ft on the rear of the property by 610 feet deep PROPERTY USE Current Use: Proposed Use: Lots 1,2,5 & 6 are vacant, Lot 3 contains a single family home. Lot 4 contains a one story wood frame garage and a carport Detached dwelling units PLAN CATEGORY Current County Plan Category: Proposed City Plan Category: Residential Suburban Residential Suburban WNING DISTRICT ClUTent County Zoning District: Proposed City Zoning District: Rural Residential (R-R) Low Density Residential (LDR) ANALYSIS The property owners have requested this annexation in order to receive City water and sewer service. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Suburban and it is proposed to be zoned Low Density Residential (LOR). Moreover, this annexation involves three and one ha1f(3.5) acres of land which the applicants want to bring to the City so that the site could be more conveniently developed under the City's Low Density Residential zoning district. Currently, the site contains one single family residence, one story wood frame garage and a carport. Upon annexation, the owners propose to subdivide '''f ". : .~~~ .: .;;. J~: :. ..:~:. ::..~:~ ~.~:..._ ~: .'.~ .:..' ::... . .; .~: :.'~ ~ . " r , ".- . ... . ~', " \w , ' . , ~ . '. . I'.. J ,- ..' , "; , ." ' . , COB A99-11 July 20, 1999 Page 2 the subject site into six residential lots per attached subdivision plat map. The lots will later be sold to potential buyers for low density residential development. I. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES Water and Sewer Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Clearwater and capacity for the project is available for both utilities. The closest water and sewer lines are immediately adjacent to the property in the Union Street right-of-way. Beth tbe sewer and water lines have already been installed by the applicants during the construction of Union Street. Applicants are aware of the applicable sewer impact fees of 5900.00 per property. However, appropriate sewer impact fees will be paid at the time of issuance of building pennits by individual lot owners at the time of development. The City will also require payment of the tap fee and utility deposit for the proposed dwelling units. Solid Waste Collection of S<llid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interloca1 agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's Resource Recovery Plant and available capacity is available to serve the property. Police The property is located within the East Police District and service will be administered through the District 3 Substation located at 2851 McMullen Booth and County Road 580. Community policing service will be provided through the City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect police service and response time. Fire and Emergency Medical SeIVices Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to the property by Station #48 located at 1700 Nurth Belcher Road. The Fire Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time. In summary, the proposed annexation will Dot have an adverse effect on public facilities and their level of service. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan designates the site as Residential Suburban whose intent is to recognize suburban low density residential areas. Residential uses are the primary uses in this plan category up to a maximum of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. Other permissible uses in the Residential Suburban plan category include Public/Semi-Pllbic uses, schools, ancillary non- residential and Recreation! Open Space uses. The annexation does not propose to change the Residential Suburban plan category and the proposed use is consistent with the uses and density of this plan category. Moreover, the annexation covers a site which , ~'~; . I ". . {. I .. , . . ~ ' . ~ : , . ," :. . " . I ~. . l ........-... CDB A99-11 July 20, 1999 Page 3 is proposed to be subdivided into six low density residential lots and will meet the required density. Further, the annexation promotes infill development as stated in Objective 2.4 of the Future Land Use Plan: 2.4 Objective - In considering extension of service and facilities, Clearwater shall actively encourage infill development. In summary, the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan both in the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies of the Plan. m. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS The appropriate zoning district under the new Community Development Code is the Low Density Residential (LOR) District whose dimensional requirements are consistent with the surrounding development on this site. The application for annexation covers a site which is proposed to be subdivided into six lots for low density detached homes. Detached dwelling units are required to have a minimum Jot size of 20,000 square feet. Five of the six lots (Lots 1, 3,4,5 & 6) wiIl comply \\ith LDR development setback requirements including lot area and width. However, lot 2 is non-confonning and is only 19,052 square feet. The applicants have submitted a flexible standard application request for a residential infiIl project, if the request is approved, will permit development to be in compliance with the Community Development Code. There is no minimum lot size or minimum lot width for a residential infiIl project. The request for a residential infill project will be heard simultaneously with this annexation request. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN There is no change requested in the Comprehensive Plan category of the site that will remain Residential Suburban with a maximum density of 2.5 units per acre. According to Special Act 88-464 which established the PineUas Planning Council, annexations of less than 10 acres do not require the review of the Council nor of the Countywide Planning Authority. Therefore, due to the small size of this property, review by the Pinellas Planning Council is not required. There are no other Countywide Plan policies applicable to this application. V. CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA LAW Florida Statutes require that a proposed annexation be both contiguous with the existing municipal boundaries and compact in its concentration (Florida Statutes Chapter 171). This property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the north, east and west of the property and represents a logical extension of the existing boundaries. The compact standard of Florida law requires tha~ the annexation does not create an enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries. The annexation of this property is consistent with this standard and no new enclave will be created by annexation of this property. In sununaty, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed annexation can be served by all City of Clearwater services, including utilities, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service level. The application for annexation covers a site which is proposed to be subdivided into six lots for low density detached homes. ~:~ " , ' '. , ~ , - , .. " '. ... ~ ..' ' . , '{",. CDB A99-11 July 20, 1999 Page 4 The applicants are aware of the applicable sewer impact fee of $900.00 per property aud of the additional cost to extend sewer service to each property at the site. Appropriate impact fees will be paid by individual lot owners at the time of issuance of building permits for development. The proposed annexation and proposed use is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. Moreover, an approved residential infill project will allow the lots in the proposed subdivision to be sold with approval of flexible standards. The property will meet the minimum lot size of the Low Density Residential zoning district. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the request: 1. Recommend approval of the annexation of the property located at 2890 & 2892 Union Street. 2. Recommend approval of the Residential Suburban plan category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Recommend approval of the Low Density Residential (LOR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. Prepared by Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner Assistant Planning Director Approval: ~ (/1f(f . Planning Director Approval: Attachments Application Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Utilities Maps Subdivision Plat Map ~.'i, NORTH - 300" Location J\llap 2890, 2892 UNiON STREET /~~\ CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA ~~ " .s>~J PUBLlC WORKS ADMINISTRATJON ~rE:R ~ 1,1 ENGINEERING ''t,~II,1 ~ NORTH Location Map 2890, 2892 UNION STREET ~ i ~ z w ... ; .. i :a MRO ll'l ~51 JOHCS LA 81 N s 011 011 << vi AR6(L.IA O(J Q ~y D~ IlElMJOA D .. SPfIVCI: VI '0- ;) ~ l lIlAOt8UllN C:l 4 Sf D R08HWOOO ?> ~[ w .. HAAS A~ ~ \) 1[ ~D C II ~7& CII ~,. J .It (Hrr'n 1 ( S, OlCU n~n I 011 ~ s, ClIOIx r"7 Icl__ "'~I 1 ( z ~ :Jl ~..t..p,. ~ ('~ <JM"" '.1. n"" · ,. -=- 6 ~~,-~~ ~~. CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING , ' '; :!:> .~;':~, ~; ~; u · ..... :.... .....: ':":~'u:; \(...:..... .. :.... ':<>" .' ).;. ,,";,~ .": ..' . ';.;.: .>. "'. 'r' ..: ':. ~ ~ ! ~: ~ . ~ ~\ . . ~ _... """ ... .... .... .... ... .... ~ i... . f~~~ ... ... ... ... ... ... . ; .. Rlos . p . ~ ... .... ... . ~ ... ... ... 1. .... I . . ,^-,...,AJ.J-".J.""J~ I ............~...................~J V- ... ..... ... ... ..... ..... ... . .. J L'" . ... ... .... -/ :7 ~ ~L/0 -J>- IloS I~ ill 11IIO ~ ~ :..1 D ~,,~ - ts ~ ildO Il~ ... .-11 ~... !i --.- ... -... .... I .... ... .. .- -... .-.-.. I~ .- --i. ItS ~ Y ~..... [L YSI!.A4 Bl. YO cnAI ClIlD..I. II I -- }- I CHANCERY LA1€: ~,-. I - ~\ ~ i .,ro ~ I~ rf' ~ J f7r-- I m ... - "'- I 1 ~ ..I,I.I.h ....~ : : IlLAa ca...o CJIll:U . ~ CM()[N ~ : : ~ ~ ...... .... -:J.", : : . .. . S tt~ . ~ . ~ "- I RS w-"l ~ ~n.u - : ~ i: ii III = : ~ ~~ ~ --( OAIU fUICI . ..I ~ = : (L TSllAC ... WAY caaII .. -" ~ .. .' I'~ /~I\'- = : " . RS IS ' . I-....~ ' . . ...~ . . . ~ j ~ '.~ COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP NAME: LARRY 8. WING & MARCELLA M. WING 2890 & 2892 UNION STREET PLAN DESIGNATION: RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN MAP NUMBER S32-28S-16E SEe: 32 lWP: 28 S RGE: 16 E . . . . ,. ' . ., '. ,J . . . , . _.' . -', ' '" _' i. "4 PARCEl. -A- SOULE ROAD PARK 9-S /R. /' P ARea. -8- - ?C - Uls-9111 28 27 26 24 23 29 CHEl ~EA WOOl S Pfi!AsE [I 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2J .... i.l ~ \ 2. 27 2' 9 29 24 I 25 I 31 i 30 i = i Iii ______ - CHM4CERJfAHcmY LA .--:- -- 2 i to ~ ;; i 32 il.33 34 Jl 35:1 li1 36 ELl 31UM )IW3E I ~;;:- '"' /lI63 25 , 22 '-- 21 llJl~9la a . .. 5 5 ~ .. i .. i I QtAHC:(RY Q) l.ANE i i ! .. III .. I ~ 51 OBIEI H 37 38 5 6 ! _ i _ II t; ~~ ~ =: ! = ~ 8 9 10 11 96 86 50 atAHCatY .. ! ~ J s i 49 tUU ~ ~65 1161 m 46.. 45:t H: 43 ~ -42 " ~ ~ .. ~!IOi ~y PI. 0 g CII&I /so ~I 511~ I~M D"R~ I 52 53 10 "54 ItSS' IIU ~ 1113 ~ Gf 41 4 7 12 13 ,.."".... OD Cl:I.II'lTY 4-7 18 .. 17 16" t 5 i a ~ ~ )f S~''''NH ( !Iff II i 12 i 13 , C~IEA W)O-'..-- -, .. .. -...- UI.,O il~ 9 ~~ ~(~~PL~ ~ : Ci ; -, "'""- .. 4 :SillS 6 94 43 48 ~ ~~ 43/03 43/~ - .. jj 56 @ 55 i Z 54 9 56 57 :: :.J El YSlUW rt .pP, b ....' :i 4' II o 61 ..:w.. 11t4 .. I .. ~ e....- g W ;; i i i ~ G2 63 64 1 :ntU 7'1 ~ 51. ~ i ~ ~ \1/03 .., ... I 4.3/04 I I 43/05 ... . "93-254l1 43/04-1 59 I Ii ' ~ "~""-"" ::J Co; R. 'M !.r ~ ~(i) 11/07 11/06 11/05 11 /04 - qL.- - lp...f CJ~J o ~ PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: lARRY B. WING and MARCELLA M. WING 2890, 2892 UNION STREET LAND USE PLAN ZONING FROM: RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN R-R TO: RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN LOR ATLAS PAGI:2448 A: 99-11 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: M & B 43/06 PROPERTY SIZE ACRES:2.53acres :Ri.ht-of-"ay: ACRES: SIC: 32 TWP: 285 RANGE: 16E COMMUNITY DIVILOPMENT BOAID: JULY 20, 1999 . CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19. 1999 Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administrati '. '. ... ...."~':...:, _~'. "::.,,'i~ .:..,.,.. .... '.....,:,. .,. ~.:'>'::",'..:'." :.~";:.L';,,: ,,'.. ';,:' , ','", .,. ....,'" :.1"",.~. :.' '. I";~". ,..... .t .' ,~'.l"," PARca - "," e)'!HlIe -; I-"~\ 28 I 27 26 j .. -- - )- ..; ... ... L~: UII.[-2:; - ~ SOULE ROAD PARK "" ~IDT 31 ; \; ; + I- 20' .r-:::::--. ..... PARCEL -e" ;.... ~~ ~ "\ \ ~I -::, -..; 30 /29 2~ 27 20/ -4 ),,{ ~ ~ r'" ~~l'&.1ooML GJ1S-918 1 I ~ ~- . I'oa f\ RllA 1'0'1 C(JlP. EASDlIllT ~; ~ ~ ;' :~ flIIT"l;...--' -F,o'rp e:- ,/ ~. e:- C EA WOO'lla pdart'E l!i Dr. (000 Ill' _~ (J ./'Dr. '" IL [000. I ~ I '. ,~~ .I:~l 11 t.o... .>- 25 ~:; j ~ 25 ~ 22 . 16 i 17; 18 19 II 20 ~ 21 jll Qt,. ~~._ 240 hi.. 1 : 98":186 :~. i.. 22 = ~; :"'iZ':. i . Of .~ . - u-ILA 10 r:lB..o C OfANm- II. 15",.~uu.r.. ~ LANEi 23 ~ UII.>- '1 .... ..J...:t'I.l .,.." ... ..... ... .... ~ ....~. ..,....,. 'u.." .~"11 ./ ~J94 V1 'JIB -'2Cl 1.. I J . 'OIl ....,#, ... ._ ~ - 7.~' ~T 50 1 -;;:r- 1-,~'o....IL ~ - 34 35 ~ 37 ~: '5' SI'c 32 33._ 11... .... 0,.. I EL" lUI( ~'U A ~E 1 36 0 _: 5 ~ 6 I 7 : 8 : 9: 10 I 11 : ...... '~;:=& ,..... -~i_: ~ _. I !:~:. - 12 i ~. 7}1:u':'" f'lW- -l ,~. a.~ruu'.,,::- '.. ... .- - I-::;eo I ,.." -7.s~.U'" _~" "" ~ __~ la. __ _ I _ _ _ .... _ 47 ~ 45 H 4 42 41 . l-; ..:~/ Lso___ ~. ,/ ~ ~ANY ~ 'f.. !lO \.\ dE1.o I ~ 17 16~ 15 ,8 ~ vn.<".. .... ,. _". 13...( .-..,.-\ ~~-"'7 _n. F ~'~77' ~:" ;;: ~"43/O' 43106 /.~:: ': '~ ":'Q ~ 1 11 EA21 O~ ~ -.. ~'~.~. UllL.l-- ... ,... .. ~ 2ll'- . -, ..... 'aao .... 'H "10 38 l s.s,.. ... ~ I J ! 4 :- I,"~... U1 Lv. .....__ ~ / ) 10 9 8 ~ -. PI.. S t.--::--... .., _. ,.... ~_ oJ "(<j 7 2.1' 1~ ~ ) W 7.!f ~ ~;~ ~ ~4~'Jl - t- l!. .:0 1/_ t..5 9 4ar:::J1 43/05 A mJ-2etlJ 56 57 56 55 ~. v~ E YSIUW g ;.,.. 'b. .,.., .u, 10 59 l~.lO9 '2211 "2] -~?C~ L,.Sl'cllo'. ~~. 0 51 62 ~ '~.''''. Ir's''''', l: "'~,~_,,? UNON j .... J .. ... .:I ~ "1Io \:D l~ .... . ~n ~ i~ ,... e, 11/08 .. ; (Wi:] \ .~ ~~ ../ I).J ...... @~ 54 ~:l l/"~~=~ ~ ~ . ~- .. ..., )2:1 ,2.0 "flj '210 UII.r- t(l'- ..... 63 64 - ;... 7!i UL E& 72 s-';'- lI:l a .. ; "3/04 43/041 i ~- .~ ~ CoR-1M sr. ... - .... . . c II 11/03 . .vi i 11/05 ; 11/04 11 /07 i 11/06 ~ ; . t o .... ..... .... ...... -.. PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND SANITARY ATLAS OWNER: LARRY B. WING and ADDIlESS: MARCELLA M. WING 2890, 2892 UNION STREET LAND USE PLAN ZONING FROM: RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN R-R TO: RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN LOR ATLAS PAGE:2448 A: 99-11 PR.OPERTY DESCRIPTION: M & 8 43/06 PROPERTY SIZE ACRES:2.53ocres Riaht-of-way: ACRES: SEC: 32 TWP: 285 RANGI: 16E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOAID: JULY 20, 1999 CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19, 1999 Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administrati I: , J ,t . ~. ~ ~..ll~ " " ~ ,I " .' ...' ,..,', ,., " ,\ :. ' .. 1(' i" -'. :..... ," . ...'.,..,. " K'; ,', : . -', P ARea "B- 29 <.J ! 21 28 :> 25 a. 22 . 29 C'l 0 21 z: 19 20 21 22 23 6- 30 ~ J II 1st 6"PVC atANCERY 6 -l.NiIE PARca ",,' Soule Rood P 16 17 18 6- VC CH y 36 37 38 3 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ 6" CD 43/05 44- 43 L ~ ,.9 50 51 43/06 52 53 EJ yui m 58 57 55 55 54 YSIUN 2"PVC II 61 62 63 64 42 41 Cf 10 43/03 :;) 6" ~ 9 PVC WI 2' ..0 43/04 4.3/041 lNClN C. It. 'M- B" UNION 1\/03 ~ 11/07 . 11/0& tl/05 11/04 S' PVC(9J) 0 ~ I P OPOSED ANNEXATION AND WATER ATLAS OWNE": LARRY 8. WING and MARCELLA M. WING 2890, 2892 UNION STREET LAND USE PLAN ZONING PROM: I ESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN R-R TO: ESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN LOR ATLAS P GE:2448 A:99-11 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: M & 8 43(06 PROPERTY SIZE ACRES:2.53ocres R.ilht-of-wa y: ACRES: SIC: 32 TWP: 285 IANGI: 16E COMMUNI Y DIVILOPMENT BOARD: JULY 20, 1999 CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19. 1999 Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administratil PARCa "A" -- ~.. ( 29 28 27 ~~ ./ "" rn~b~IQ'41E~ .~~ . "')J-.... ~ ..' PARCEl. "B' ]11' ,...- ~"( ~. e. 27 ~~ t~ ~l CClURT 29:1~ u 16 17 \8 19 20 2\ 22 23 mH 25~~' 30 ~~ ;~ '~ .. '''7S'' y-- aiNlCERY J>. ;p - ~ awfCeRY lANE It'i ..&?"" ~ _ ,so"" ... u"" ~~ 32 33 35 ~!;J ij ~: :5 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 1.3 47 "6 45 44 """" --- 24 23 18 17 "I 15 . ~ Pt.~ ,M'... ~ ~~ 12 1.3 ."'" 48 ~y JIG' -.,...... ,.._ ) LIiI (( \ .'.6.- :::::...:-J \\ !i J.~:'; \~_ 26 '\ "Il r\l'l? R IDO.~ ., :rr ~.,. " IS-"~l 20. l II~:I i Q LA ~I.t \If JI"""CIElI ,j~r.. i~~ .3. .37 38 I~ ,.3 !a ~ 4-1 I~:~ I 'Iii ~ PI. ~~ W'~ ~ aELO fifim ID:ii71 L-J ~ 1 ~~ v 49 50 51 43/03 43/06 52 53 ~ 10 9 M7~ ~ 0IEl.SEA~' PI. S .. ''''IS"'Vi13' 'S" 4 5 6 4J~4 a ~;;- II JD~ n'u 58 ~ a 57 56 55 5,. ~ 9 m'"i6 d mas · ~ .J8. l!i.i301 --f~ "'J7 · ~ ..J!..!. I&!!!..LJ ~ 6U5. .,.. El. 'fSIUU .:!! U_:lI ~ ~ ...- 7 ~ :~ r 51 ~ 62 .~[[TI'; ~ ~ E? ~~. &J . I~~ . I J" 1ilJ~ .~. ...... 'DO" l!l',... 10 4.3/05 59 43/0,., ~ ~ I m l:&.... I!l ~ 0 ~//JIl" 7'7; Co R. ,... ':. ~ ~::'p.;J.~ I~~; EE , ~~ itb~ ~07 ~ "/08 ,... ~l./ ~ ~,.s- ~~- UNION 51. \1/03 11/06 \1 /05 11/04 o ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOAR.D: JULY 20, 1999 CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19. 1999 PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND STORM ATLAS OWNER: LARRY B. WING and MARCELLA M. WING 2890, 2892 UNION STREET LAND USE PLAN ZONING FROM: RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN R-R TO: RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN LOR ATLAS PAGE:2448 A: 99-11 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: M & B 43/06 PIlOPERTY SIZE J\CRES:2.53acres Riaht-of-way: ACRES: SEe: 32 TWP: 28S RANGI: 16E Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administrati, ORDINANCE NO. 6429-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 490 FEET EAST OF SOULE ROAD AND 90 FEET SOUTH OF CHANCERY LANE, CONSISTING OF METES AND BOUNDS 43/06 IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2890 AND 2892 UNION STREET, TOGETHER WITH THE ABUlTlNG RIGHT-OF-WAY, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: $ection 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: See Exhibit 8 attached hereto, together with abutting right-of-way. (A 99-11) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Ordinance No. 6429-99 Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pine lias County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau Cit~' Clerk Leslie K. Dougall-Sid Assistant City Attorney ; PARCQ. "A" - P ( " SOULE ROAD PARK .J1t-9t. 28 27 21 24 23 . -n""b -j n A 211 ~~.I ..;) K~ '-.I ..:I / .8l \ PARCfl. -a- U~I' 27 26" ;;' 1-:" 21 :2 9 24 CHEJ SEA PE lAsE [I 29 16 17 18 IV 20 21 22 2J 24 I:J 31 i 30 i I I I ... i i I I i I I i .. I i .. I -- & .. - ~COIT i u a ~ aweaJtY CHN<<:Dff (JIlIHE I , IIlL --. .,,- 32 i 3.3 i 34 i 35 I i JC5 i il 50 I I i . i -.. -.. I 37 38 I i i I i EL"ISIml )HASE t : J 4 !I 6 7 a 9 11 12 13 -~ au 10 I ~u 96- 8& In.rMlWA'rJI 47 ~ 45 i 43 ~ 42 41 i I ~.'y , ~ ~ I i '"j "I I.~ ~ $l\.i ~ ,,- ~y .... 0 51 l8IIIlI ~ ,. 0 ,/ . .,ill IfM liJR ..- Z~"'HH ft . 50 1uI11 i 12 i~ 43/03 43/0lS S2 53 10 CHEL EA. '. .u 1lIU 93- -,. , ~u , lIa .... ~ ", MI ~II I~ , a ~'0 i i 9 " ~ ~ I: I I !II n ~ a.,... . A-\P\.~--i 43/05 s \MY . ~ i I Ii I I i · U.:S;- *3-ai1 43/04 43/041 ~. 61 62 63 fl4 1 2 94 43 I I I ~ ..,. .- n -~ . Co" '14 lNtii ...... -,..., ~ 11. I . I J I 11/03 I ~ 11/07 11/08 t1/~ 11/04 I r - 0 ~ .CJ~ - ~ ~~- PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWNER: LARRY B. WING and MARCELLA M. WING 2890, 2892 UNION STREET LAND US~ PLAN ZONING FROM: RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN R-R TO: RESIDEN TI AL SUBURBAN LDR ATLAS PAGI.:244B A=$9-11 PROPERTY DESCR.IPTION: M & B 43/06 PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 2. 530cres Rllllt-of-wa1: ACKES: SIC: 32 TWP: 28S IANGI: 16E COMK1JNITY DEVELOPM1NT BOAID: JULY 20, 1999 CITY COMNISSION: AUGUST 19. 1999 Prepared by. EA- Public Works Administration EXHIBIT A . '.. . . . , 1':- .. , .' . . . . .. . . . .. ... . '.I ".,' ...;.;.0;.... ~"':'f~,:,: .""';'l"d"~'!,~" .~.'~' .-r'.' .. . EXHIBIT B PARCEL 1: The Easterly 183.31 feet of the South ~ of the East ~ of the Southeast X of the Southwest % of the Southeast X ot Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, less and except the Southerly 33 feet for road right-at-way; AND PARCEL 2: The North 14 of the East % of the Southeast % of the Southwest % of the Southeast % of Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, all lying and being situate in Pinellas County, Florida. Ordinance No. 6429-99 . '. . . .. .' i ' ,'. ~ . , . . -, '. '. .' . . .' , ., . ~. .# . . . . "~ ORDINANCE NO. 6430-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PlAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED. APPROXIMATELY 490 FEET EAST OF SOULE ROAD AND 90 FEET SOUTH OF CHANCERY LANE, CONSISTING OF METES AND BOUNDS 43/06 IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2890 AND 2892 UNION STREET, TOGETHER WITH THE ABUTTING RIGHT-OF-WAY, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS. the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF , CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater Is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of ClealWater, as follows: ProoertY Land Use Category See Exhibit A attached hereto, together with abutting right-of-way. (A 99-11) Residential Suburban Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6429-99. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Com missioner Approved as to form: Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6430-99 ,w '~+ -' , ' ~..' , ',.".,' . ,,.. ..,. ( ~,~. .' . , '. ", , . , ," .', ..,'"" ... '.' '-." ,,_..... ;-"-,..'. ...:'...... ..,:...., ,; '., .,., _,0;<' .", .'.: ~ ..., ..';.', ' . EXHIBIT A PARCEL 1: The Easterly 183.31 feet of the South % of the East % of the Southeast % of the Southwest % of the Southeast % of Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, less and except the Southerly 33 feet for road right-of-way; AND PARCEL 2: The North ~ of the East Xr of the Southeast % of the Southwest % of the Southeast % of Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, all lying and being situate in PineIJas County, Florida. I : I I Ordinance No. 6430-99 <,:,&. , . . . . " .' ,. '. '.' \, :,' ,.. . '," ...' ,,:.::: . .'. .' I. ..;.1 ., ' ORDINANCE NO. 6431-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERlY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 490 FEET EAST OF SOULE ROAD AND 90 FEET SOUTH OF CHANCERY LANE, CONSISTING OF METES AND BOUNDS 43/06 IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2890 AND 2892 UNION STREET, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, TOGETHER WITH THE ABUTTING RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: PropertY Zoning District See Exhibit A attached hereto, low Density Residential (LOR) together with abutting right-of-way. (A 99-11) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subjec,1 to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6429-99. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Leslie K. Douga 1- ides Assistant City Attorney Ordinance No. 6431.99 ;'. . ... . 1 .. .. ... .. -.. ... . . - . . :.. ,:....;:;, . .. , .. '~~-', '.. ~'" ". .', ,..". EXHIBIT A PARCEL 1: The Easterly 183.31 feet of the South ~ of the East % of the Southeast % of the Southwest % of the Southeast ~ of Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, less and except the Southerly 33 feet for road right-of-w,ay; AND PARCEL 2: The North ~ of the East ~ of the Southeast % of the Southwest % of the Southeast % of Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, all lying and being situate in Pinellas County, Florida. Ordinance No. 6431-99 "" , " ',' >. ,:. .~.) . ~ .'". "- .,: > . ,.~ t: ' ";..".. '. ~ .. ".,. " . > See Agenda Drawings . #8 8-19-99 . . +Or s-u.bd\v \ St'Ch f~~+- VhC\.-f' ()O'3~ . ,__, ,. .: . . . ~';-',".' - ~ . . I '_ _ .1', ' . .,.. '~'. ''''/ .,,',.' ~".' '~ ..~, , .".." \.' ~ . ". ,..:. ,,: .;:'.> ....<":.: ' .' . .'.' :'.,:...:....~.:-?'.~~.'h-:_.+., ,.'""rtf":' ...., !.'.""(""')-""':'.',."~" '\ ~ ,....~.~. ," ,.;.' .'. . Item #9 003s-' . (JLb ~ Worksession Item #: Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandwn <3 Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: August 19, 1999 SU BJECT IRECOMMENDA liON: · Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendments for 2854 Saint John Drive; Owners: Russell S. Jacobs & Sydney A. Jacobs. MOTION: Approve the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) for Lot 13, Block C, Virginia Grove Terrace, 5th Addition, and pass Ordinances No. 6432-99,6433-99 & 6434-99 on first reading. (A99-12) (g) and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: · The property owners have requested this annexation in order to receive City water and sewer service. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Urban and the proposed zoning is Low Medium Density Residential (LMOR). The site is currently vacant. Upon annexation, the owners desire to build a single family home at the subject site. · Water and sewer service will be provided by the City ot Clearwater and capacity for the project is available for both utilities. The closest water line is immediately adjacent to the property in Saint John Drive right-ot-way while the sewer line is located at the rear easement of the subject site. · The proposed annexation and proposed use are consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. o The proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. · The Community Development Board at their regularly scheduled public hearing meeting ot July 20, 1999 unanimously recommended approval of the annexation, comprehensive plan category of Residential Urban, and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code Reviewed by: Legal ~)Q A 4L:tJ: N/A N/A N/A Total Originating Dept: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES User Dept. Costs Info Srvc Budget Purchasing Risk Mgmt Public Works DCM/ACM Other Funding Source: CI OP Other Current FY Attachments STAFF REPORT AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF SITE & VICINITY LAND USE PLAN MAP ZONING MAP UTILITIES MAP ORDINANCES NO. 6432-99, 6433-99 & 6434.99 i. Submitted by: City Manager Printed on recycled paper o None - Rev. 2/98 ., t'.~. fLD 'J- CDB Meeting Date: July 20, 1999 Case No. A99-12 Agenda Item: m.B. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT gENERAL INFQRMATION OWNERS: Russell S. Jacobs & Sydney A. Jacobs REPRESENTATWE: Stuart Cohenl American Housing Corporation LOCATION: 2854 Saint John Drive, approximately 360 feet west of Lori Drive REQUEST: To annex the property into the City of Clearwater at the request of the property owners and approve the appropriate City land use plan category and zoning district. SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 8.580 square feet Of 0.20 acres Dimensions of property: 78 feet wide by 110 feet deep PROPERTY USE Current Use: Proposed Use: PLAN CATEGORY Current County Plan Category: Proposed City Plan Category: Vacant lot Detached dwelling unit Residential Urban Residential Urban ZONlNG DISTRlCf Current County Zoning District: Residential, Single Family District (R-3) Proposed City Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) ANALYSIS The property owners have requested this annexation in order to receive City water and sewer service. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Urban and it is proposed to be zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). The site is currently vacant. Upon annexatio~ the owners desire to build a single family home at the subject site. I. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES Water and Sewer Water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Clearwater and capacity for the project is available for both utilities. The closest water line is immediately adjacent to the property in Saint John Drive right-of-way. The closest sewer line is located at the rear easement of the subject site. The sewer q CDS A99-12 July 20, 1999 Page 2 impact fee of $900.00 was paid by the applicants on May 22~ 1999. The applicants are aware of the additional cost to extend sewer service to the property which is estimated to be $1,200.00. They will be responsible for this payment. The City will also require payment of the tap fee and utility deposit for the proposed dwelling unit Satid Waste Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's Resource Recovel)' Plant and available capacity is available to serve the property. Police The property is located within the East Police District and service will be administered through the District 3 Substation located at 2851 McMullen Booth and County Road 580. Community policing service will be provided through !be City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect police seJVice and response time. Fire and Emergencv Medical Setvices Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to the property by Station #48 located at 1700 North Belcher Road. The Fire Department has stated that they will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time. In summary. the proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public facilities and their level of service. n. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The PinelIas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan designates the site as Residential Urban whose intent is to recognize wban low density residential areas. Residential uses are the primary uses in this plan category up to a maximum of 7.5 dwelling units per acre. Other permissible uses in the Residential Urban plan category include Public/Semi-Pubic uses, schools, ancillary non-residential and Recreationl Open Space uses. The annexation does not propose to change the Residential Urban plan category and the proposed use is consistent with the uses and density of this plan category. Further, the annexation promotes infill development as stated in Objective 2.4 of the Future Land Use Plan: 2.4 Objective - In considering extension of service and facilities~ Clearwater shall actively encourage infill development. In summary, the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan both in the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies of the Plan. CDB A99-12 July 20, 1999 Page 3 m. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS The appropriate zoning district under the new Community Development Code is the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District whose dimensional requirements are consistent with the surrounding development on this site. A review of the proposed survey site plan indicates that the site and the proposed new construction can meet the dimensional requirements of the LMDR district as a standard development. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN There is no change requested in the Comprehensive Plan category of the site that will remain Residential Urban with a maximum density of7.S units per acre. According to Special Act 88-464 which established the Pinellas Planning Council, annexations of less than 10 acres do not require the review of the Council nor of the Countywide Planning Authority. Therefore. due to the small size of this property, review by the Pinellas Planning Council is not required. There are no other Countywide Plan policies applicable to this application. V. CONSISTENCY WITH FLORIDA LAW Florida Statutes require dmt a proposed annexation be both contiguous witll the existing municipal boundaries and compact in its concentration (Florida Statutes Chapter 171). This property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the north, east and west of the property and represents a logical . extension of the existing boundaries. The compact standard of Florida law requires that the annexation does not create an enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries. The annexation of this k'roperty is consistent with this standard and no new enclave will be created by annexation of this property. In summary, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed annexation can be served by all City of Clearwater services, including utilities, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service level. The applicants have paid the applicable sewer impact fee of $900.00 and they are aware of the additional cost to connect the property to the City utility systems. The proposed annexation and proposed use is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. The property can meet the dimensional requirements of the LMDR district of the new Community Development Code. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. 1. Recommend approval of the annexation of the property located at 2854 Saint 10hn Drive Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the request: 2. Recommend approval of the Residential Urban plan category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. . ...~, ." .' : .,.. ____h_ l . .. ' . - , , ~ .' ,.,,' . ... ,'. .~. \ COB A99-12 July 20, 1999 Page 4 3. Recommend approval of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. pared by Etim S. Udoll, Senior Planner istant Planning Director App p . g Director Approval: A tachments A plication A rial Photograph of Site and Vicinity d Use Map Ding Atlas U . ities Maps " , " , ,_ ~ ,0 ...1" ~ ,. ~ '. ..... . ~ '," '. ,<'11 ". " j , . " ' '. '" '_. "', .' ~: . .~ ~ NORTH scale 1" - 200' Lac a tio rl 2854 51. JOH~S Map DRIVE ,""-', .1''';., ",EA~ '.... {(J~1\ \\~~ ~ t(Jl . ,,' "~",.,.,,, CIn' OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLlC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING r , ~1.", ',:t.",. ~.:?"" '.,".tt. I~:'" ~.~;\~~-":_"":~~>'j':~;;'t. .,..;,~u~.:-;.;.,..,> !.r".).'.:'." ..""''l';,-.....' ." ,~~;~.~~r~~:'t~:;,!~....i-(t.';~!~.-:;.~~~.~:.:::i;~ ....: ":':~-"''':, ~~. t..,... t-...\.;:' ?,.::. #. - d '. " ~.:r ,'~. ,~,~,.\:"!-.,.:,,..,. ,l;>'f' '. '~':""~'';.o':,.J.;1 ,1.::'/l..,4_~~~,,"'J.'.'i'l ~ NORTH NTS Location Map 2854 ST. JOHNS DRIVE u O1ANC(RY o u WAY ARawA BDlaIUOA ~======--:> o~ o o . PROJECT SITE ~S? ST. NT '" 0 OR z ... l!!i -' 3 3 ! ; u Q ::5 C <II g ~ ~ ~ iE .... ... JC] w SAN SAN "".-, A-{"'EA~;":. cJ' ... ~ n ~"/, ~\ ie' ~ ~~ ....~ ~t ":.~T(R ,~~/ ~I"",.J CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBUC WORKS ADM[NISTRATlON ENGINEERING - If III w --~ .\ I I I I I 1 -- ~~r ~~ ~~ ~ - ~! ~t-- ~ ~ w~ ~-= ~i--p.- ~r- _ _ I- r-- I~:! ~?o~ .... --- $T .JOHN -",- ..1- - W~t- 10 II Jl~ r-- '-- Rf1 I ...~t-- ~ -.. · I I ..r""( - .. JL-- ~ ! ~~ TEMAC... r:- IA. -~ al ~ I " I r- iii I-- II ~ '._ _":: "- . -a ,~~ J - ..n ..I ~ - -l~ ': -.. - ~ 1..... ...- I ~ ..._ i un _ _, ....... ,... "" - .- t . I f~ CAlVE fl , T..jJ INS - . ~ u. ! I ~ .... . , T[1IlAAC[ rJllvt 5T CROIX - II. ...::.::... (U - i-". ~ -. -- . !_.... aliVE - -. -.' - ..' =-~ ~ ......'- - I ~ --- g ~ is ~ --- ...- !_r-- D' SARAH CA Tt-I;RItE ...--~ ~ 5 I.. i- . -.-- 1 w ~ .... - j ~ ... I ~1\fE 5 T .JCHI . I . .-.' g ..I 1:\1 au COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP NAME: RUSSELL S. JACOBS & SYDNEY A. JACOBS 2854 SAINT JOHN DRIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: RESIDENTIAL URBAN MAP NUMBER S5.29S-16E SEe: 5 TWP: 29 S RGE~ 16 E 16 17113 9,- .' . :,,'" ..4~' ",.: ~~~'\~ ,...' .8." 8 "31 1':1 ,.,34 nD. \ . 70.,.:7.'. &4 6 >< 1726 ii S@ R 1122 III VJ 4- ms 3 1'109 2 t'1OS .... " J .. mol a ! 1 2. .. mJ8 . t7t1O 1 50 ., i 21 11113 . 22 . I.tJ UfOgZ3 '7 lR o (Q CJ.) '''"11~ 60 '" 0) ~ 15 ~ ~ ~ 0: a 1M ~ 1768 33 1764 32 60 16 15 !to ~ ~ 1781 (Q ~ C>) <a ~ ~ iE o 2"'" 1713 at) t?6? 3 31 1760 II) l;Q ~ '" 1lI III "l 30 1756 29 1762 1148 28 21 1149 2 3 ~ ~ 4 ~@ Cl:l ~ 2 4 6 8 Cl:l - Cl:l ~ 'lit S 9 7 5 ~ ~ lQ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ 15 17 ~<a Cl:lc:tl Cl:lc:tl ~~ ~ ST JeIINJOHBRIVE 0) ; 14C11 () '" co CI/ o \C SARAH 17" 2 ~ 6~ ...., 11)'" ~~ 2 I'-. fb ~ 12 O? ~ c:tl '" 10 \I) Ql ID (jJ 6 re ~ 8 ~ ~4 ... III ~ 14 4. 60 1701 @ A 1 3:, 5Ja ~ = 13 60 0) fti 2 ~ 7 ~ .. ~ ~ ~ 15 16 17 ~ 1725 ii: 1719 C ~50 34 ~. 60 4 ~ '" 18 ~ II) co '" t\l !to <:::I ~ !to !to t-..l' co co CQCl:l t\l ~ t:\,f'" c:tl ~ 3 ~co c:tlCO "'''' 1 1611 t6t3 2 o 10 o <0 lAJ l&J % ..., II) ~ - II)(C Q)Q:l ~"" 20 ell CD III CIl 24 26 \I) !to ~ 1712 01'0 l'Q) Q)Q) 2 ~Clj4 2n 3 ~ Q) ~ 32 18 28 22 17 ~ II) ~ 25 -I 19 ~ 21 23 25 27 '" !to ItO l/,) ~ ~ 170B C Q:l 60 ~ o l;,; "l S. R. 5 9 0 o III o o <.0 ~ 60 ~ ; Of 12/02 I/) Cl:l ~ 20 19 ~ 0) ~ DRIVE ~ ~ 0) co Cl:l ~ 16 18 19 4 Ol GQ ~ 6 Q:J 5 Q:J Q:J ~ 0) Q:J ~ 6 5 Cl:l Q:l ~ S. R. FEDCBA ~ 104 2 ., ,-. GHIJKLJ/lt 106 PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION RUSSELL S. JACOBS and SYDNEY A, JACOBS 2854 ST. JOHNS DRIVE LAND USE PLAN ZONING RESIDENTIAL URBAN R-3 RESIDENTIAL URBAN LMDR OWNE.: .aOM: TO: ATLAS PAGE: 264B A: 99-12 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOT 13, BLOCK C, VIGINIA GROVE TERRACE, 5th ADDITION PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.20 acres Rlll1t-of-WI J: SEC: 5 'iWP: 29S ACRES: RANGI: 16E COMMUNITY DIVELOPMENT IOAID: JULY 20.1999 CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19. 1999 Prepared by. EA- Public Works Administration .,(~. _<',' / 'I _~, (', . ".~~:..,~. ..... ~<~,. :.'d -q ,"- ,'... -... ~< ,.,1, "t' i '.'.'...' . ", ~ ~ I:' ~__:. ..,<: .. 404.\I":IO":J) .", I:l 16 . .Il N III 110 60 no 10 -4!" 15 .. 1(.") ~33 60 ~ ~ R Ii II ~:!l ~ ItO ~ 2 . a: g32 136 . C 110 ~ 101.7 ~ 10 13 \U.I 0 SARAH DRIVE <0 29 III 10 10 ~ ~ " 10 .. >- . J' ula J' :z E","llI tn. Eo e. on oU I 0 !; 10 .... n ted oth j; 16 18 z 211 136 < 104..11 271 145 t- - 7 19 ., en ... 9 po. !; ~ ~ 21.7 U 8 .. .. eo eo " 20 1011.7 X a 5 a: fI (J 2 ~ IOCL.I .... V) ".01 " IS .4 ~ ., 1$.:1 U -.. 0 DRIVE Ul 0 c.o 3 3 1 ... It _2 :Ii ...~ ..., G' en ~ 2 . 6 ~ 2 2 II! g I: 101I.1 l 1 1 t ~I ~ 5 I ~ .. KXI 60 12 10' Dr. Ea. . ., ..., ...~ 111.1 M-5 .1.5 '7.7 a III 10 S. R. S 9 0 0 0 0 S. R. PlI4I tIlU c.o t40 IJD 50 50 IZU - . .. a a . 60 %17 ~o Ii 21 Ii fI 1 II ... ; 12/02 I_ I'" ,..: !I ;: 1 - Ii 22 9 II 2 == LU 117.J .. laJ Ii 23 Ii LU 3 f! 2 li uo 8 7' 2 Ii ~ g PROPO ANNEXA TION AND SANIT AR Y ATLAS COMMUNITY DEV LOPMENT BOAID: JULY 20.1999 CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19, 1999 RUS ELL S. JACOBS and SYDNEY A. JACOBS 2854 S T, JOHN S DRIVE ZONING R-3 LMDR A: 99-12 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOT 13, BLOCK C, VI GI NI A GROVE TERRACE. 5th ADDITION PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.20 acres OWNEJl: FROM: TO: ATLAS PAGE: Rlah t-of-w a,: SEe: 5 TWP: 29S ACRES: RANGE: 16E Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administration ~::.'\ ',."', ." " ~f '.'~ ., "..' < .~ ~",:..', . ..',' H . ~;, ~": " . ..~~.": ~, -".-, .'. '.,}1~. ".,"_' r. .' ~r/ -0 ". - - 16 Z" ~ - -4 4" 15 16 15 2" 1 33 2 4- 6 8 10 12 14- 16 18 20 15 14 ~ .2 ~1+ ~ 17 32 140: ~ 6" 7 9 ?11 13 ~ 6" It! 1 19 a Q 31 3 5 15 17 VEl .13 18 13 3 SAf AH DR 13 30 ~ 19 12 4- a... 4" 4" !b- 12 >- ~ \ 11 ~I 29 ,11 20 5 4 6 ~ 1 2 8 10 12 14 16 18 ~ 6 28 10 21 10 < - 10 ~ 27 9 7 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 y7 19 9 22 9 ,------ CI _, --- 8 CAn- ERINE I 26 8 8 .. 23 8 4- :----- ~ 9 6" 6" 25 ....... ...... ...... :::::::::--.- 7 24 10 .. . E 7 7 10 24 -.::::::- 23 22 21 20 2 19 06 6 >c 6" 6 11 4 6 ~ 25 12 r14 ~ 6" :::;0; u 13 ~5 15 16 17 5 t- 1 2 3 4- 5 In j 1~ a: C/J 3 5 1 r 4 4- ~$ 2-- ....... ... C&I ~ -.......:...._- "\J 4" ..., - 6"Co. 4" .3 :) '-1.1 . 14 [RIVE 17 ST 10 ~N 12 16 18 2 2 4 8 10 20 22 24 26 28Q: 2 4 6 2 6" 0 13 15 '- 6 o. 3 5 7 9 I 11 17 19 21 23 25 27 1 1 1 .141 3 5 ~ .'3 . R. ) 9 C ,../ 6' ~~ ~ 6 Co. Lel~ 4 \V ~ -..; \V -, 48" St. Pete E j -. 8" 20 21 34- 1 6" 4 3 S. R. 590 - 12/02 .26 2 1 1 ffiffiH 4" 22 33 4- 2 19 J; - w E ~~4 LaJ 23 32 LIJ 5 1R~ ~ 3 ~ 2 . .. 1_. PROPOSED AN'NEXATION AND WATER ATLAS OWNER: RUSSELL S. JACOBS and SYDNEY A. JACOBS 2854 ST. JOHNS DRIVE "80M: TO: LAND USE PLAN RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESIDENTIAL URBAN ZONING R-3 LMDR A:99-12 PROPER. TY DESCRIPTION: LOT 13, BLOCK C, VIGINIA GROVE TERRACE, 5th ADDI TION PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.20 acres ATLAS PAGE: 2648 Rllht-.f-..y: SEC: 5 TWP: 295 ACRES: RA~GE: 16E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOAID: JULY 20,1999 CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19, 1999 Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administration i I l 1.13 l ! \ q !30- 12 i 11 \ 1'1" I .10 ~ 16 15 14 , :9 ~ ~ ii 15 C ,&22 cmp _ 12~ cmp 16 15 17 14 14 18 13 19 12 \ \ 20 21 10 9 22 9 --- 8 I 8 B / / 23 ,7 .,6 . i t .5 I 4 4- 3 2 1 ~ \ I I~ i:j 119 i 1~ : OWNER: FROM: TO: 7 24 6 x i5 5 25 5 .... en 2 ST JOHN .3 .2 . 2 4 1 3 5 2134 22 33 23 32 ~ w :z ~~ ~ ~ Q 2 3.3 32 31 .30 29 28 27 9 10 .3 --- 2 12 14 16 8 4 6 10 18 20 7 9911 13 13 3 SARAH 19 I DRIVE 15 17 4 11 >- 2 o ~ 2 < ..... en 7 ---- 8 3 5 4 6 2 8 10 12 14 16 18 5 6 7 6 3 4 5 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 ~7 19 ---- 26 25 CA THERINE 6 ~ --- 14 12 '10 24 --- 21 20 11 23 22 8 7 9 I 11 19 2 4 6 4 2 ~ ~ 5 o lIIL 12 , 13 14 15 j .... 16 17 18 ~ it: c 3 5 .3 --- 16 I 18 20 24 26 28 4 22 6 2 13 15 it: o -l 5 17 19 21 23 25 27 3 S. R. 5 9 0 S. R. 2 1 12/02 , ~~4: 2 .. /,..,. PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND STORM ATLAS RUSSELL S. JACOBS and SYDNEY A. JACOBS 2854 ST. JOHNS DRIVE LAND USE PLAN RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESIDENTIAL URBAN &TLAS PAGE: 264B ZONING R-3 LMDR A: 99-12 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOT 13, BLOCK C, VIGINIA GROVE TERRACE, 5th ADDITION PROPERTY SIZE ACRES: 0.20 acres IUsht-of""ay: SIC: 5 TWP: 29S ACRES: IANGE: 16E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOAID: JULY 20.1999 CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19, '999 Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administration ,.>.1.[ ~ :' '., ., ~ , ". ~ I '. ~" ." . . I . " .' ,'.. ~' ORDINANCE NO. 6432-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 360 FEET WEST OF LORI DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 13, BLOCK C, VIRGINIA GROVES TERRACE FIFTH ADDITION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2854 SAINT JOHN DRIVE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044. Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: I Section 1. The fol/owing-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly: Lot 13, Block C, Virginia Groves Terrace Fifth Addition, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 51, Pages 43 and 44, of the public records of Pinel/as County, Florida. (A 9e.12) Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission hereby accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Services Administrator are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and records of the City. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pine lias County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6432-99 . ',,: > ',' .... . ~.' '. '. ." ." .'" ': .' (: ,'.' .>d ,'..' ....'..,' , ;' . ".: ','.' . '. ," ,.'. :.... ..' .' ,:' ~:':( :"., .' .. ,,:' . ...... ....' .'. --.............. ..,. '. ,.. . .. ...._. " . "" _. . " . ~&"t-~ ; '~....-A' " ..... . ~ .,'_ ." 16 n/13 15 ms 14 f7'1O 10 ,,,,s I.') 9 na;,:.:~~ "'~8 '.~-: 8- r_' 8 .,oJI..... 1734 nZ7, . I:.. .] U...7- . .. .... ... 6 ~ 1728 m 5 @ ~ 1122 flJ Ul + "'8 3 t1D9 .2. 110S J t7t4 o ! 1 2 I"IOB 1700 1 so 00, = 21 1613 . 22 ~ ..... 180923 '7 o III 20 00 I7n1~ 60 ~ 1 en ~ ~ /787 ~ \I) II:) ~ 1168 33 60 0) 15 ~ 2 4 ~ it: 2 'f'""4 o 1773 l() 1167 .3 T764 32 ~ a= c C) III 3 14) '" ~ re ~ l'- ~ ~ 15 17 ~co ~~ 19 o 0) to 011 31 '760 176 I 30 @4- ~ '756 29 /'152 1148 28 o CD SARAH DRIVE ...10 11)10 ~~ 0) to co "II ~ '" 12 0) l'- ~ CII 10 ~~ CQ CQ 6 ~~ 8 ~ II) ~4 - QI ~ 14 ctl ~ 16 2 18 21 1'749 1149 3 19 60 ~ 2 '" O:l :g C\I 6 4 2 15 16 17 ~ '''25 ii: 1719 o 18 4 ~@ ~ 3 ctl ~ ~ CII c:a <:l~ II) c:a l'-C'o ~ ~ ~~ ~ It) ~ ctl'" C'octl ~~ 3 '05 :g C\I ctl ... ctl ~ .. ot CD Of '" .. llD 14~ o ID o <0 " " co CI/ :g '\) '" - &l)CQ QlQ;) CIj~ 20 It) 0) (D (Q co l:Q ~ CII 22 24 26 1712 0) II) 0) Ii; :g ~ 2 '" C\f 4 '" 6 2n 1711 16 18 28 2 4 1701@ 1 13 15 ~ -' 5 ~ ~ 17 19 ~ ~ 21 23 25 11 27 1 3 i :; 60 ~ re tQ ~ ~ " co N ~ (Q <0 lD ~ ~ ~ Q) ~~ o l'- Q;) ~ 1708 60 S, R. 5 9 0 o II"l o s. R. o o ID 0:: CD CD ~ 12/02 .. 50 ~ 34 ~. 1612 33 .. ,-- 60 ~ 60 ~ 1 161" 1813 2 1 FEDCBA l'- I 32 lAJ ~ 1~OS J GHIJKLJ/lw 104 2 106 I PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OWN I.: "ROM: TO: RUSSELL S. JACOBS and SYDNEY A. JACOBS 2854 ST. JOHNS DRIVE LAND tISE PLAN ZONING RESIDEN TIAL URBAN R-3 RESIDEN TIAL URBAN LMDR A: 99-12 PIlOPER TY DESCRIPTION: LOT 13, BLOCK C, VIGINIA GROVE TERRACE, 5th ADDITION PROPERTY SlZE AC.ES: 0.20 acres 11,1lt-of-WllY: SIC: 5 TWP: 29S ACRES: IANG!: 16E ATLAS PAGE: 2648 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IOAID: JULY 20,1999 CITY COMMISSION: AUGUST 19, 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 6432-99 Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administration " .. " ." \: . , ' .. '-..' .. ORDINANCE NO. 6433-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THI: LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 360 FEET WEST OF LORI DRIVE. CONSISTING OF LOT 13, BLOCK C, VIRGINIA GROVES TERRACE FIFTH ADDITION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2854 SAINT JOHN DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL URBAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's corl1prehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Property Land Use Category Lot 13, Block C, Virginia Groves Terrace Fifth Addition, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 51, Pages 43 and 44, of the public records of Pinel/as County, Florida (A 99-12) Residential Urban Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6432-99. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-Si e Assistant City Attomey Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 6433-99 ;-~--~~~~:~~--~),~._.."~."~': .... ,'; ...., ...... " \ . . . . l" J ',' , . . . ORDINANCE NO. 6434-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 360 FEET WEST OF LORI DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 13, BLOCK C, VIRGINIA GROVES TERRACE FIFTH ADDITION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2854 SAINT JOHN DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pine lias County, FI9rida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Pro~~ ZoninQ District Lot 13, Block C, Virginia Groves Terrace Fifth Addition, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 51, Pages 43 and 43, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. (A 99-12) Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Section 2. The Planning and Development Services Administrator is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6432-99. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk \ Ordinance.N~99.-- .:. . ... .,.- ,.-' ....._~.:. '..-... ........~-..a.~... ... :.~.. .......~ ',:< <<... .-' ...., ';.' ....-., ~< I'~. ....~\.~."': ......., ,-,; . '_'If,!':', :.,'. (.'. '.,' ''', :- '.~", '.}., :: ._'~.....::"_ ....' ".' ..' .;'. ~'_ :': ": ,.',1<." r L-D 3 Clearwater City Commission Agenda. Cover Memorandum Findl Agt'nda Item # J() Mpeting Datt': Aug .19, 1999 SUBJECT /RECOMMEN DATION: Conduct the first public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and transmit to the appropriate reviewing agencies. I!l and that the dppropriClte officials be duthorized to execute same. SUMMARY: EXPLANATION: The Planning Department has completed revisions to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan based on State mandated Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) criteria. The Comprehensive Plan serves as a long range plan for land use, transportation, housing, recreation and open space, potable water, sewer, solid waste, stormwater management, capital improvements, conservation and coastal management. BACKGROUND: The Clearwater Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City in 1989. The City has completed EAR-based amendments as required by State law Chapter 163. F.S. and 9J-5 F.A.C. to evaluate the plan five years after adoption. In January 1998, the City Commission adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal RepOti of the Comprehensive Plan and recommended changes to update the Plan, known as EAR-based amendments. The proposed goals, objectives and policies contain changes recommended in the EAR as well as additional recommended changes since adoption of the EAR. These additional changes more accurately reflect current conditions, operating policies and procedures, revised dates, new projects and other relevant changes which have occurredt~ since the creation of the EAR two years ago. The Community Development Board at the June 15th and July 20th meetings was formally presented the Comprehensive Plan and voted 7-0 to recommend transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs by the City Commission. Following the public hearing at the City Commission, the City will transmit the proposals to state and regional agencies for their comments and recommendations. Upon receipt of the comments, the Community Development Board will hold a second public hearing in the Fall of 1999 and forward comments and recommendations to the City Commission who will hold a final public hearing for adoption. Attached is an executive summary of the proposed amendments and the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments in the proposed Comprehensive Plan are indicated by strike through and additions by underline. Originating Dept: 1) J ~ Planning and Dev. .5'~P' User Dept. Planning and Dev. Services Attachments Executive Summary ~ Proposed Comprehensive Plan Costs NA Reviewed ~ Info Svcs Legdl " -, NA Budget NA Public Works NA Purchdsing NA DCM! ACM Risk Mgmt NA Other NA Total Funding Source: Capilal Improvement CurrE"nt FiSC.l1 Yedr OP(!','llflg ( )tt,,~ Appropriation Code: Submitted by: Cit Manager ~ Printed on recycled Jlaper o None Rev. 2/98 ~ \.~ '~~~":"/:2'~'{:"':.' ..,~t:~;~~,~:\";<:'ili,r~: ..... '~'""<;..:;:\ .'. '.' ::qL ~, .: .... :'," ',: . \~,',' ~ .. .... J .,', . . ~ '_.' ~ " " . .' l . J _. " , \. . " ..' Executive Summary Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT I. Urban Design and Historic Preservation. Revised Goal 2, Objective 2.3, and Policies 2.3.1 -2.3.4 are proposed to address the need for increased focus on historic preservation and urban design as required by the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The new objective and related policies can be found on page 9 of the draft Future Land Use Element. II. Traffic Calming, Bike and Pedestrian Access. Objective 2.5 and Policies 2.5.1 - 2.5.3 are proposed to address transportation and land use issues discussed in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The ncw objective and policies are found on pages 10 and 11 in the draft Future Land Use Element. III. Mixed Use and Planned Development Techniques. Objective 2.2 and Policies 2.2.1 - 2.2.3 are proposed to address the need to focus on innovative development techniques that are compatible with the surrounding environment as indicated in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report and required by Rule 9J-5.006(4)(c ). The new objective and policies are found on page 8 of the draft Future Land Use Element. IV. Community Development Code Objective 3.2 and Policy 3.2.1 arc proposed to reflect the new Community Development Code and the zoning districts found therein. These revisions are found on pages 12 - 16 of the draft Future Land Use Element. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT I. Traffic Circulation Objective 5.5 and related policies on pages 8-16 are proposed to be anlended to reference the level-of-service, backlogged and constraincd road listing compiled by the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization. The listing is proposed to be deleted from the Goals, Objectives and Policies ofthe Comprehensive Plan. Objectives 6.3 and 6.4 on pages 20 & 21 are proposed to be amended to reference the transportation improvement program of the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization. The listing is proposed to be deleted from the Goals, Objectives and Pulicies of the Comprehensive Plan. J >; . , '. " . . ~ . :' .'. ',' I .' " ~ J' .... ' -, ,. . II. Mass Transit Objective 8.2 and related policies on page 25 are proposed to be amended to coordinate the Major Investmcnt Study for Pinellas County with all ofthc appropriate agencies. Objective 8.4 and related policies on page 27 are proposed to promote mass transit through various coordination of plans and agencies. III. Aviation The goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Airpark are proposed to be primarily amended to reference the revised aiport master plan to be adopted(page 27). IV. New Transportation Element Goal 12A on page 3 I is proposed to indicate the City's intention with providing the required multimodal transportation analysis by October I, 2000 in accordance with State Statutes. HOUSING ELEMENT I. Housing Rehabilitation and Neighborhood Preservation Several policics throughout the Housing Element are proposed to include greater focus upon housing rehabilitation and neighborhood preservation. Objective 13.6, policy 13.6.1 and 13.6.8 were revised to address these issues. These revised objectives and policies can be found on pages 8 and 9 of the draft Housing Element. II. Affordable Housing Very Low Income househoJds are included in the analysis of affordablc and available housing throughout the draft Housing Element. Additionally, Objective 13.2 and Policy 13.2.3 are proposed to better address affordable housing needs. These revised objectivcs and policies can be found on pages 3 and 4 of the draft Housing Element. III. Infill Development Policy 13.1.2, on page 2 of the draft Housing Element, are proposcd to bcttcr reflect the ResidentiallnfilI Projects as found in the Community Developmcnt Code. 2 .1 ! .' p....., .\" .~.,..... ;' ,.' I~ '''~""~"",,,''''.:_:,'~.-4' 4 (_h.'.." I '. ~. , ',p. '. I SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT I. Wastewater Facilities Objective 14.2 on page 3 is proposed to be amended to address the continued need to improve the visual appearance and odors associated with wastewater facilities as set out in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. ll. Interceptors (Trunk Lines) Policy 14.3.6. on page 5 of Clean vater's Comprehensive Plan was clarified to focus on the condition of interceptors (tnmk lines) throughout the city as required by the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. m. "Package Treatment Plants" Policy 14.3.2. on page 5 addresses the issue of the encouragement of areas that require sanitary and sewer service as the result of closure of "package plants" to connect to the City's sewer system. IV. Annexation Policy 14.3.2. on page 5 is proposed to be revised to encourage annexation of areas that desire to be connected to the city's sewer system as required in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. V. Force Main Crossings Two major force main crossings were replaced in Clearwater Harbor as indicated in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, however a related policy can be found on page 5 in policy 14.3.5. VI. New Pump Station The Evaluation and Appraisal Report discussed the need for a new pump station and a short force main connection in the area of Lake Chautauqua and McMullen-Booth Road. The City has undertaken major pumping station replacements and upgrades throughout the city as discussed on page I of the Sanitary Sewer Needs Summary. Policy 14.3.5. on page 5 can also illuminate the measures taken to address the requirements. VII Other Changes Agencies that were renamed are explained throughout the sub-element. 3 ~'i.;l '.. ,~". ,.' " . :'. _ "';'" .~ f,,'.'. (, I '_.: _1'-" ~", t "I, ,.~ ,', ~. '. ,', .'. " II _~. :'.'" SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT I. Increased Education for Curbside Separation Objective 15.6 on page 12 is proposed to be modified as per required by the Evaluation and Appraisal Report to increase awareness and education for the city's curbside separation program. D. Citizen Participation and county cooperation for toxic waste disposal Policies 15.6.3. and 15.6.5. both on page 13 are proposed to be amended to reflect the requirements in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. III. Visual Appearance for Dumpsters and Recycling Containers Objective 15.7 and policy 15.7.1. are proposed to be added to the Comprehensive Plan to address the visual appearance objectives of the city. STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT I. Utilization of both Natural and Man-made WetIands for Stormwater Storage Policy 16.3.2. on page 18 is proposed to stress the City's deep commitment to utilizing both natural and man-made wetlands for stom1water storage as required in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. Policy 16.3.6 on page 19 is proposed to be added to emphasize the city's commitment to the preservation of wetlands. n. Treatment of Storm water Run()ff The Evaluation and Appraisal RCpOIi indicated the need for the City of Cleanvater to explore new techniques for the treatment of Stonnwater runoff. Objective 16.5. on page 21 is proposed to address this requirement and all of the policies 0/1 pages 21 and 22 arc linked to this objective in many related aspects. ill. Other Changes As required by 9J-5~ the term Drainage was officially struck from the text and replaced with the term Stonnwater Management. 4 ~~~' ,- . _ '. . .,._.,. '''!.:''.... . ;'::- .". " ,.~."y., ,.:' ~.':' ,,:~:. -, ...,'......-;: ,..... ..~i5,',,-:,,' ,':,-.... ~I...-:.~....... /-~l_~..:"....~" /,....,: 'A', ':. ,':' -:'.1'::',,,:.:..' .. POTABLE WATER AND NA TURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB- ELEMENT I. Reclaimed Water Policy 18.5.7. on page 32 is proposed to be added to the Comprehensive Plan to address the continuance and extension of reclaimed water within the City of Clearwater. D. Potable Water Conservation Policy 18.2.6. on page 28 and policies 18.6.2., 18.6.3. and 18.6.4. on page 32 are proposed to address the requirements set forth in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report regarding the use of reclaimed water and the implementation of potable water conservation. ill. Other Changes Many agencies were re-named as it was commented upon throughout the element. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT I. Coastal High Hazard Area Objectivc 19.2 on pagc 3 modifies the defmition of the Coastal High Hazard Area to reflect the current definition found in the Florida Statutes. This objective's policies are proposed to include disaster mitigation initiatives. II. Public Beach Access Objective 19.3 on page 4 is proposed to be amended to include thc various transportation initiatives that provides improved access to Clearwater Beach. III. Coastal Redevelopment Objective 19.6 on page 6 is proposed to coordinate redevelopment activities in coastal areas with the Comprehensive Plan and other disaster mitigation plans. IV. Coastal Resources Goal 20 and related objectives and policies(pages 7-10) are proposed to be amended to bettcr delineate the need for development review, stormwater management and water quality monitoring along the coast. and beach restoration and renourishmcnt. 5 .;i;.' '~~":"~"~~":'\~::"''l,: ;', ~;,_:'.'~:::.:.-.~~'!~ .~.t..........<;,.,""n",;- I.'. ..~< '~~""",'.I. -') .~ ..:~~t~....y...,~'-:~~.~::'-'.~~..,..,j'..~~~\-',:,,-:....t:".~'~":~";:;'''~'''':~:',~\';.:,,~~~.-,:".:':':"':"...~-:~~~,. "'~,, ;' ;i:'J';'~-I'.; :....(..,.'~I~..l:~lli~.~.~.~T/.t V. Water Dependent Uses Objective 21.2 and related policies on pages 11-13 are proposed to better delineate State requirements for prioritizing water dependent and non-water dependent uses and coordination with appropriate agencies. VI. Hurricane Evacuation Objective 21.5 and related policies on page 14 & 15 are proposed to provide better coordination of improving hurricane evacuation routes and public shelter capacity. CONSERVATION ELEMENT I. Ongoing Conservation Activities The proposed Conservation Element amendments better reflect ongoing programs and coordination with various agencies. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT I. Park Facilities Objectives 24.1 and 24.3 are proposed to be amended to better ensure resident's needs are being served with various park facilities as stated on pages 3 and 6. Policy 24.3.1 is proposed to be amended to review the service guidelines for recreation facilities. II. Open Space Beautification Policies 24.4.2, 24.4.10 and 24.4.11 are proposed to be amended to address beautification efforts in open space areas, gateway corridors and other areas identified in redevelopment plans including "One City, One Future." These modifications can be found on pages 8 and 9 of the proposed Recreation and Open Space Element. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT I. Annexation Objective 27.1 is proposed to be revised to better reflect the City's need for coordination in the etfort to annex the existing enclaves. This revised objective can be found on page 6 of the draft Intergovernmental Coordination Element. II. Tampa Bay Estuary Program Policy 26.1.6 is proposed to be added to reflect the need for coordination regarding this Program. The new policy can be found on page 3 of the draft Intergovernmental Coordination Element. 6 .~!. .'~.. '~,".. .'... t ~. " .~ " .,. ,.'., I "'''''' t~. ...... ~..~.,~ ;...kl.....::. 4." ~.,/_..,- ., -', ",'~", ::, .' "., . ;".:..-.".'~.Y ":.)1:-:'" , .. '.'.. .... ~ " "., ,:....., . ,., .0':" ,,," . '.,:'~'" . < '1 III. Coordination with School Board Policy 25.1.1 is proposed to be added to reflect the City's interlocal agreement with the Pinellas County School Board. The revised policy can be found on page 2 of the draft Intergovernmental Coordination Element. IV. Statutory Requirements/Changes Chapter 163.3177(6)0) F.S. revised the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. Pages 7 and 8 in the draft Intergovernmental Coordination Element reflect new goals, objectives, and policies added in response to the statutory changes. These changes include the following: . Dispute resolution process . Joint processes for collaborative planning on population projections, school siting, concurrency, and problematic uses. · Identification and coordination of special districts in PineIlas County. 7 ";';".~,.. ' ,.'..:~ " ; . '1 . ,'" , ". " ~ . -,~,",' . ~ ~" .,.' .. "", '..., . ~ , If 1 " . l, '~"l . , ' ,...: \' . .. " .. .' . Additional Information was provided with this item (#10) See Official Records Reports/S tudies ,I O()~ 0 . Pv.. \0 \ \~ <:.. \-\-~r, ~ I I RESOLUTION NO. 99-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA RELATING TO COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION; DESIGNATING THAT PORTION OF CLEARWATER BEACH BOUNDED BY MANDALAY ON THE EAST, THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE ON THE WEST, BAYMONT TO THE NORTH AND PAPAYA TO THE SOUTH AS A CITY OF CLEARWATER REVITALIZATION/REDEVELOPMENT AREA; MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on May 20, 1999, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6410-99 providing for the designation of City of Clearwater revitalization and redevelopment areas, and; WHEREAS, studies have been done of the conditions of Clearwater Beach and; WHEREAS, the Commission determines that the area bounded by Baymont on the north, Papaya on the south, Mandalay on the east and the mean high water line on the west, are deteriorated, obsolete and in need of revitalization and are an obstacle to the logical and economically feasible redevelopment of the area, and WHEREAS, market based redevelopment in the area requires assembly of sufficient land to development midrise buildings on site amenities, off street parking in order to carry out the effective revitalization in redevelopment of lands and improvements which are deteriorated, obsolete or in need of revitalization. Resolution No. 99-38 WHEREAS, the results of information and studies have been presented to the City Commission for its consideration and included in the public record and the Commission has considered such other evidence of the conditions in the beach areas which have been presented to it, and; WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that certain actions are appropriate and necessary and should be taken to address the conditions now present and expected to be present in this area; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA THAT: SECTION 1. FINDING OF CONDITIONS. Based on the evidence, data and facts presented, the City Commission does hereby find: (a) Conditions are present in that area of Clearwater Beach described in Exhibit A (such area being referred to as the Beach Revitalization/Redevelopment Area) which are detrimental to the existing quality of life, are an obstacle to the sound growth and redevelopment of the beach and which substantially impair or arrest growth and revitalization within the Beach Revitalization/Redevelopment Area and Clearwater beach area; and present conditions and usage of improvements in the beach area are detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare as shown in "Clearwater Beach: The Need for Redevelopment" (attached hereto as exhibit B). and "Redevelopment Potential" (attached hereto as exhibit C). (b) A predominance of inadequate or defective street layout exists within Clearwater Beach as shown in the Clearwater Beach Traffic Study (attached hereto as Exhibit D) in relation to size, adequacy, and accessibility. (c), Deterioration of site and other improvements occurring within the beach area as described in "Clearwater Beach Needs Analysis (attached hereto as Exhibit E). SECTION 2. The Commission hereby determines that the area is deteriorated, obsolete and in need of revitalization and redevelopment and is appropriate for revitalization and redevelopment. Coml'llission further determines that it is logical and appropriate that individual parcels of land should be assembled into logical and appropriate units of land, which will allow for desired revitalization and lor redevelopment. SECTION 3. This resolution will take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1999. - Brian J. Aungst, Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Pam Akin, City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk 2 Resolution No. " . . f ' - .: ,'."'.. . I ......,~ ' ." ,H,' .~ . 1 :...... .' t... . I'. "1"' ,_. . " . ,,1 That portion of Clearwater Beach bounded by Mandalay on the East, the mean high water line on the West, Baymont on the North, and Papaya.on the South. II III t '0 to.) . u. :g -- I \D en -.I H ... 0 " \D CD M ,,- ... m u. '0 It IQ - II jJ-IJJIOf 1111. I _ I Exhibit A Cleanvater Beach: The Need (or Redevelopment by _ Charles L. Siemon & Wendy U. Larsen I The City of Clearwater has initiated an ambitious citywide community revitalization effort entitled "One City. One Future.'" One of the major areas of attention in One City. One Future. is Clearwater Beach. 1 Beginning in the late 50s, central Clearwater Beach developed rapidly with a mix ofsrnaJl motels and scattered small retail strip centers and individual commercial buildings. During the 60s and 70s, the City developed a vital tourism industry which became the principal element of the City's economy. During this time frame, small and medium size motels were developed throughout the Siemon & Larsen, Boca Raton, Florida 33432. Siemon & Larsen is a planning and planning law consulting firm which specializes in number of areas of land use including community redevelopment. Exhibit B central beach area and larger hotels and condominium structures were constructed at the south end of Clearwater Beach along the Clearwater Pass inlet. Areas to the north ofcentIal Clearwater Beach and to the south on Sand Key developed as high quality residential areas with mostly single family dwellings to the north and high rise condominiums on Sand Key. In the 80s and 90s, notwithstanding the City's world class beaches and the vitalityofthe residential neighborhoods to the north andsouth of the central beach, the City's tourism economy fell prey to intensive competition in Florida, the Caribbean and around the world. Room rates in the smaller hotels, particularly those ~ithout direct access to the beach, stagnated, I il/l iting the ability of owners to maintain and improve their properties. Many of tlte smaller motels have been sold and resold as successive buyers, often from overseas, have tried unsuccessfully to overcome the negative momentum of the central beach area. Many small motel owners feel trapped, with no way out other than to find someone wilJing to overlook current conditions in the belief that they will be able to succeed wllere others have failed. Conditions on Cleanvater Beach are highly variable from block to block. Some properties arc well-maintained, like Heileman's Restaurant on North Mandalay, and arc very successful. Some 2 4f!:.;IftIttO. . --~...: . ..--- properties are less-well maintained and show their age. Other properties are so close to the end of their economic life that even modest investments are out-of-reach, .like the small motel which attached chain-link to second floor balconies in order to comply with new child-proof balcony rail code requirements. The deteriorated condition of central beach is made a1l the more apparent because it fronts on a beach which is literally recognized around the world as one of the great urban beaches, and is bracketed to the north and south by quality residential areas which are vital and valuable. ThedeclineofcentraJ beach reflects an all-too-familiar cycle of decline in beach front communities, primarily along the Atlantic east coast of the United States, from Atlantic City to Miami Beach. Developed when most visitors came by car for extended stays, old fashioned hotels and small "mom and pop" motels are unable to compete with newer, highly-amenitized destination resorts. In response, owners cut r()om rates to attract visitors, further compromising their ability to maintain and improve their properties. All-too-often, the negative momentum of older developed beaches reaches urock bottom" before community resolve and economic reality collaborate to reverse the trend. Miami Beach and Ft. Lauderdale Beach are two Florida beaches which have been in the throes of decline and revitalization during the last twenty-five years. Vacant Store Front ~.. . 3 4 As noted in the Florida Planning Group's 1996 Redevelopment Poteuti~earwater IJeacl)2, "if an area looks like it is declining, it can become a self.fultilling prophecy, as potential investors, and then visitors, shy away from a place that does not appear to have good long-term potential. This is what happened in Miami Beach's South Beach area, as well as in Fort Lauderdale Beach. Both of these resort areas went through a long period of decline and disinvestment before they were redeveloped. Now, after long redevelopment efforts, both are successfully repositioning themselves in the increasingly competitive international resort market." 'The City ofClearwaler has the opportunity to enhance the beach's public perception and create a community which is vibrant, economically successful, and a valuable asset to the City's character. Clearwater Beach Revitalization Strategy As a central element of One City. One Future., the City has committed to the refinement and implementation ofa Strategic Redevelopment Plan/or Clearwater Beach and is in the process of developing a comprehensive implementation strategy for the Strategic Redevelopment Plan. The elements of the strategy are relatively simple and straightforward. .) To create an aJrival and distribution system at the western terminus of SR 60 which is both attractive and functional <. To create a destination quality landmark at the western terminus of SR 60. -:. To provide additional off-street parking for beach patrons. + To remove parking from the dry-sand beach to the west of South Gulfview Drive. .:. To improve the character of North Mandalay. .:. To improve the circulation system to the north and south of the intersection of SR 60 and Coronado and North Mandalay. 2The Florida Planning Group's 1996 Redevelopment Potential for Clearwater Beach closely examined the area's redevelopment potential and future economic viability. s <. To redevelop South Gulfview and the parking lots to the west of Gulfview as a.16greaf' beachfront with facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists and skaters. (e To facilitate redevelopment by removing regulatory obstacles to quality redevelopment. .,. To promote private sector investment on the Beach and to provide redevelopment assistance in the fonn of off-street parking, "holdout extinguishment" in support of the assembly of logical redevelopment units and to eliminate obsolete or deteriorated conditions and joint public/private partnerships. The City has already taken significant steps towards implementing the Strategic . Redevelopment Plan for Clearwater Beach, including approving a new clear span bridge for the Memorial Causeway and a large roundabout to provide additional arrival and distribution capacity. Tne City Commission recently authorized the Administration to proceed with the development of two additional parking garages on the beach which would include sufficient capacity to allow the City to remove the parking which is located on the beach to the west of South Gulfview. The City is also actively involved in the design of road and streetscape improvements for the major roads on the Beach and in particular North MandaJay and South Gulfview. Obstacles to Revitalization The revitalization of Clearwater Beach is hampered by a variety of factors and conditions. The public realm - public streets, sidewalks and other places -- are, with a few notable exceptions like the Clearwater Marina, relatively unattractive. Sidewalks are narrow, uneven and discontinuous and in some cases used for storage of trash containers. Land within the central beach area has been subdivided into relatively small parcels which are practically unuseable for modem development. Small lots are difficult, if not impossible, to redevelop because of limitation to ground level buildings, off-street parking requirements and contemporary building fonns. In fact, mast of the lots on Clearwater Beach were originally developed in small assemblies on more than one lot. The small lots simply do not allow for contemporary development practices with on.site parking, outdoor cafe seating and arcades. In many cases~ a single lot., usually improved with a small single family unit which has been convened into some sort of commercial use is sandwiched in between two or more lots which have been improved with larger structures. There is very little off-street parking and most of the parking that does exist requires a user to back out into a travel lane to exit the spaces. Moreover, in some areas, the size of the lots are made even more problematic by the pattern of public rights of way. It is relatively easy to illustrate the economic obstacles to redevelopment of small parcels on the beach based on data available from the public records. There are number of factors that govern potential redevelopment of small lots including the impracticality of developing second floor uses and providing off-street parking. Although most of the lots are platted with a 50 foot or less width~ most historical development took place or assemblages of two lots. Consider for example, a 10,000 square foot lot which is currently improved with 8,860 square feet of conunercial floor area. The property has no off-site parking and adjacent properties are currently " 6 -- '... ----- ~.._-- ---.. - _. '-_.,- - - .. .... - -- .. - -~._- ,----- ,-. t " ,..". ---....' . . . .' ,I _.___ -.----1 . ' " f ' I ' ~ I,' ~ -.. -.......f . . 1 . # , .. ,.' ' , ,/,' " ! :' :!.-~'!'~'li > = :~l ,. --. ':: " '.... ~ -.......- f.-_ _ ' . :' I -1 .-.- ( .--4 I '. f_. ! '1' " /- .,:: ' .:,. ~- ~l-If t'{7 fG'- I lit J#g ~E.~ _I/~-:~ 8e l~ On-s'r<<t Leading A. used as a T-shirt shop and a vacant store front. The current assessed value of the property is .. $525.600, which according to conventional wisdom is about 85% of the fair market value of the property. The property is not listed, but the owner indicates a willingness to sell for $1.1 million. Assuming that a qualified developer/investor can acquire the property for only $620,000 and rehabilitates the property at a cost of $25 per square foot for revitalization and tenant improvements, the developer/investor would need to rent the property for more than S 16 per square foot plus taxes and assessments. Given the lack of ofT-street parking, the condition of the general area, existing rents in the area and the character of adjacent uses, the likelihood of commanding a gross rent in the vicinity of $18 per square foot is very low. The demolition and replacement of the existing improvement is even less feasible because of the practical and regulatory requirement for off-street parking. At a minimum, I commercial retail should be served by 3 off-street parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area. Assuming that a developer/investor was to acquire the property for $620,000, demolish the existing structure and rebuild the maximum square footage with required off-street parking, the maximum square footage would be approximately 4,500 square feet with 14 off-street parking spaces. Assuming further that it cost $25,000 to demolish the existing structuret $1,000 per off-street parking spaces and $85,000 per square foot of new construction and tenant improvements, the developerrmvestor would have to lease the new space for in excess of$40 . triple net in order for the project to be feasible. Even if it is assumed that no off-street parking should be provided on-site, the economics of the redevelopment are problematic. That is so because the net rent required for new space with no parking in a declining area where rents are low would have to be in excess of $29 per square feet. Although there is no hard and fast rule as to a minimum size parcel for a contemporary redevelopment, most observers believe that a parcel of at least 2 acres is needed in order to support mid-rise development with off-street parking, desired amenities (e.g. pools) and COSTS Acquisition Demolition Construction Parking Total $620,000 25,000 382,500 14.00Q ~1.04J..500 Rent Required/SF $40.13 7 reasonable open space. In most parts of central beach in need of redevelopment, it would require - the assembly of approximately 8 parcels of land to create a 2 acre redevelopment parcel. The size of the existing lots on the Beach are particularly problematic because they have created a "crazy patchwork quilt of ownership" which makes assembly by arms length transactions very difficult, if not impossible. History and experience from around the nation is clear that sooner'or later, at least one property owner is going to assume the role of a "holdout" and demand a substantial premium. The redevelopment literature is full of examples where dcvelopcr~ carrying out a private assembly end up spending 50% of their land cost for the last 20% of the land, often destroying the economics of the proposed redevelopment. Many of the structures within the central beach area are substandard in tenns of Back Out Parking compliance with building codes, and few if any of the uses have adequate off-street parking. For all practical purposes, there are no off-street loading facilities on central beach and deliveries are made over the curb from public rights of way. Many small motels have parking spaces where the driver must back out into the travel lane to exit the property. Structures in the central beach area are not particularly well-maintained and many are in dire need of revitalization. Economic conditions on Clearwater Beach are relatively weak on an overall basis, particularly when compared to other beachfront destinations in Florida; and this is particularly so for the smaUer motel properties on Clearwater Beach which do not have direct dry sand access to the beach. The occupancy rate for properties on Clearwater Beach with less than 50 units average is approximately 15% less than the average occupancy rate in all of Pinellas County with an average room rate that is slightly less than the countywide average. There arc significant vacancies in commercial properties and those properties which are occupied, experience frequent tenant turn over. Even Pelican Walk, a relatively new and modem retail center has recently experienced declining tenancies in tcrms of rents and occupancy and 8 many older properties have significant vacancies. There are very few quality establishments on , the beach with cheap tee-shirts and swim wear the most readily available commodities. Priority Redevelopment Areas The Slralegic Redevelopment Plan/or Clearwater Beach identifies the two blocks west of North Mandalay between the Clearwater Beach Hotel and the Hilton Hotel as priority redevelopment areas. There are several reasons why these areas have been given priority. First, North Mandalay is the traditional retail street on the Beach, but it is in serious jeopardy at this time with declining rents and high vacancy rates. As a result, private I investment at the Hilton, the relatively new Pelican Walk and Heileman's restaurant are at risk. The two blocks are currently developed T-shirt Shop with small motels and strip retail centers. The existing improvements have no practical value for revitalization, except for the possibility that the advantage of not having to elevate to meet flood elevation requirements may justify rehabilitation along the west side of North '! J Mandalay. An analysis of tax assessment data ;.:1 indicates that land value within the two blocks --/ , , represents approximately 700/0 of the total .: i! assessed value for land and improvements, as compared to a range of 33 to 50% for comparable properties on large parcels with beach front access on Clearwater Beach and Sand Key. Indeed, the two blocks are bracketed by parcels of land where the improvements constitute 1/3rd of the assessed value for the 9 2:= . . . total property. .. While two entities control slightly more than 50% of the land within the two blocks, any realistic, market-based redevelopment in the area requires the assembly of sufficient land to develop mid-rise buildings, on-site amenities and off-street parking. In addition, market data from Clearwater Beach shows that dry-sand beach access is a major factor of economic success on Clearwater Beach; Only 9 out of 22 parcels in the priority redevelopment areas front on the Gulf of Mexico, most of the properties are separated from Gulf Beach by a public right of way. The north south right of way of Gulfview could be vacated, but only if adjacent properties are assembled so that direct access to the right of way is no longer required. Notwithstanding the negative factors just described, there is significant developer interest in Clearwater Beach, particularly in the area between the Clearwater Beach Hotel and the Hilton, I , to the west of North Mandalay. Quality residential, hotel and time share developers have expressed interest in redevelopment, however, available properties are not of sufficient size to actually permit the development to happen. . .. . . \ \ . . ,.. '... ...' . ,: Exhibits C, D, & E are filed with the original Resolution '~,,', " """:,,,::.:~:,/.> ,:~.,..~:',;:~ 0071 . . t . \.' \I ... . ........ ~) .. \'. '" , ",-' j.. ., ,. .. H') J'Io -Jl", . i. J- " ., -,. ~' .1 r.~. . ., I"J( . , ~ . ., . . . ~\ . ill! .. . I j.. ,I f ,\ ._\ I " I ,/ ( : /'~\." ,.f. \ . ' "" · . t ......, ,i\..... -- /:" '--' . - '-' ':://:, ~ 00// "> / .'. (. r -' //' . - . ." ~ .., ... . - ' "" ' .-, . '" ", " . .' ',' ,:,' ':', ' ' . ,'.. " ' " , . ,'. ..:,,' . , -------- .. " . ~. .. ." .: ...... . .,. .,.' . ..' --- :-,..., . .\,' . .:.:. ......~.~ . ....... . .: .. ._.. I..... ~ ~ I I ,...... ,'~) ~ . "-' " ....v:, .'.... '/1" ,... ."" .. 'l ,..I. f0 / ~ ~./ ...... . 6~ '" "':"'.,), ~,/ -' ,/;, (~ ;;"" ~ !.lI '" M I I I I I I I ; I / ! ! I j I / I J , i , i ! I I ! I I ! I , ! i f I / j l 0i0I / i t i ~~~:'.,.. ~ '1' , I-< ... . - , "', - ,. , , ~ ..,', :.'. . . .~: . ~:!. ;' . I:. f. ," ,.1. ;',: ,."...t t ..1 ',,\! ":i", .6 " , ; < t '" i: .,; '.... :~~t~:\ ... 'Y.'.'. "...-'1" ~ ..~~:if~~!~:\, .' . ) ~ . \. '. "'::-....~:~.;::~~.'II;<~:O;~~'~.I"e.J,,:~...~,~. "t. .... '....".,.;.~~~J;~.......,~>,.. ,~l'<d'.".~...~;~~'~.7 ~ ~ . J~~i~1."''':T'"..i~,!I~~~''~:7~':',~_, --..,.. ~. '.....' ~"'"~~tlI&C1"t>,4.-.J,.........~..:r.."'~~.-<' ~.""'~~~~;.-::;,:r... .,."', ;"';:ff;W~~'Ff'~W~~'-. .....,.~........,:LL....:.~-,f~E,L.....; .''1", ~. f:::;(~f J . ..~"',~""~,,,,,.:t :: ~~';'~:.:::::a~(.i~t<41Z-~~ .... "~' t~'1 ;.:, ...:;...:.::;;,"--~,",,-,,! . . ...~.---;';"._.._~. . ..,. "'" ""....--.---. .' " ~~~;~~~~~w;j;:~ .. _... ...... ....! .i .., '~,-' n .......,':: .. .~~~4 t I.. i' f t f: t:.., ]'1 - ~.~~., '-'J!'~ ~.... . .... -::~ J. .~ ,..' ~.. ~:ti;\'~ f~fi,Y!~J . )>.,..1.."", ' '\ .:'~.I' ","(,~ "J)I ~r~,'~ r ~ ~~!m~"r: ~~~\,t. .' , . ':; r. , .~ :;~;;'Jl ;' ~ ~: . \ ~i'~~~'\~;i.:" ' ~.~~ I~ f ;;:),. ,\ ~ " :.. ~ .'1: \,'i , . .r, ) It ~~~t ~~; ~ .r'o ..' .1 . ~ ", ~( II I ,. if \tr.. ..,;' : H.'T ..... ~.. r' I / .~ '. .......i-M. .. \0...,.,..-- ,,~~ " , '. .'; . . .- - . ~. '., . ~}!II! r> . :1 "\. '.. I:~ , l,':',f , ~ .. /> )-., . . \ \ / I \ )1 I' , / j l '\ .._{",..-: - -. ..- "f. ), .. \ I l /\ I :1. . . ."i .. " '~ .'> ;~~ ,.: , l .. . ~ . l' .... ,~ .. . .: :!;~ ;:~ ....Lj /, '-:- u " '/ / :>.,.'\ '-~' '-)~I :"1 , , .:' -;---;: -. ,/ "I' - (~) iI , j '. . ........., :. "~ '.:", ..r. , '. .~-;\ - "-,"-~~ ~ -. 'hl. f ::;'. ,h'~.: _ .~. .... ;..~-... ,:..~. .: ',,' -',/' ',,'n' . ~,' - . " , , " ' .' ':' ..~ ," \ , - " ';'>':, . , ' . , Item #12 60 f}/ 0 - ~.i ORDINANCE NO. 6417-99 I~ ~ Y\d f<.. . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 1, GENERAL PROVISIONS, SECTION 1-106, TRANSITIONAL RULES; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 2, ZONING DISTRICTS. TABLE 2-202, "lMDR" DISTRICT MINIMUM STANDARD DEVELOPMENT BY REVISING THE REAR YARD SETBACK; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 2, ZONING DISTRICTS, SECTION 2- 703, FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT FOR THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT BY ADDING FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR OFFICE USE; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 2, ZONING DISTRICTS. TABLE 2- 1004,110" DISTRICT FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY ADDING COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 2, TABLE 2-1104, IIMU" DISTRICT FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY ADDING COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 2, TABLE 2-1204, 11111 INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY ADDING COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 2, TABLE 2-1304, "IRTlI DiSTRICT FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS BY ADDING COMPREHENSIVE IN FILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 3, SECTION 3-1205 BY REVISING THE REGULATIONS FOR CREDIT FOR REQUIRED LANDSCAPING; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 18, SIGNS MAKING SEVERAL REVISIONS ON CORNER LOTS, SETBACKS, ALLOWANCES FOR SIGN FACE SIZE, LOCATION, HEIGHT AND LIGHTING OF SIGNS; AND AMENDING SECTION 4-204, OCCUPANCY PERMIT, REGARDING THE REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY TO RECEIVE AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 6. NONCONFORMITY PROVISIONS, BY ADDING PROVISIONS REGARDING NONCONFORMITIES CREATED AS A RESULT OF EMINENT DOMAIN; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 3. SECTION 3-1503, NUISANCES, TO ESTABLISH TWO ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS DECLARED TO BE PUBLIC NUISANCES; AND AMENDING ARTICLE 3. SECTION 3-1505, PROHIBITED ACCUMULATIONS BY DELETING THE SECTION IN ITS ENTIRETY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1 Ordinance No. 6417-99 WHEREAS. the City of Clearwater adopted a new land Development Code on January 21, 1999 which was effective on March 8, 1999, and WHEREAS, since the effective date of the new Land Development Code, the City of Clearwater has reviewed numerous development proposals in all of the new zoning districts in all parts of the City and which utilize the Minimum Standard. Flexible Standard and Flexible levels of review, and WHEREAS, the review of these development proposals has identified recurring important concerns in the Land Development Code, and WHEREAS, the Land Development Code did not establ!sh provisions for the treatment of properties that are affected by eminent domain and the City has determined it necessary to establish such provisions; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires for the Land Development Code to function effectively and equitably throughout the City, now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Article 1, General Provisions, Section 1-106. Transitional Rules, is hereby amended by adding a new sub-section I entitled "Properties Affected by Eminent Domain" to read as follows: 2 Ordinance No. 6417-99 Ill. Properties Affected by Eminent Domain. When an eminent domain proiect has beQun and has achieved a substantial amount of progress as evidenced bv the condemninQ authority's adoption of a resolution and/or the approval of final construction plans with qreater than 60% completion and/or other actions that demonstrate substantial proQress prior to the adoption of this Code, the condemnino authority or property owner may request that the City review the property under this section. If requested bv either the condemninQ authority or property owner. the City will evaluate the property's compliance with the previous land Dev.f3lopment Code and related reQulations and this Community Development Code and develop a post-acquisition site plan which applies this Code where phvsically and financially feasible and adequately improves the public safety issues of the site. The Community Development Coordinator may require mitigation and/or improvements to the site that are related to the specific conditions of the site and implement the purposes of this Code. Based on the above criteria. the Community Development Coordinato~ shall review and approve a site plan which shall govern the re- development of the site after the acquisition by the condemning aQency." Section 2. Article 2. Zoning Districts, Table 2-202, IIlMDR" District Minimum Standard Development is hereby amended by adding a Minimum Rear Yard setback for accessory pools and screen enclosures of 10 feet and revising the drawing depicting Minimum Standard Development in the "lMDR" district by revising the Minimum Rear Yard setback for Detached Dwellings from 15 feet to 1 0 feet for accessory pools and screen enclosures. Section 3. Article 2, Zoning Districts, Section 2-703, Flexible Standard Development for the Commercial District is hereby amended by adding the following flexibility criteria for Offices and renumbering the subsequent sub- sections as appropriate: "I. Offices: 1 . HeiQht: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan. landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required or improved desion appearance; b. The increased heioht will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential property. 2. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any buildino by emeraency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan. more efficient parkinq or improved desiqn and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 3. Off-street parkinQ: The phvsical characteristics of a proposed buildino are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parkina spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of sianificant portions of the buildinQ for storaQe or other non-parkino demand Qeneration purposes.. 3 Ordinance No. 6417-99 Section 4. Article 2, Zoning Districts, Table 2-1004, "0" Office District Flexible Development Standards is hereby amended to add "Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project" as a Flexible Use with the following flexibility criteria and renumbering the subsequent sub-sections as appropriate: A. Comprehensive Inti" Redevelopment Proiect: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use. intensity and development standards; ,.>\- ~. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect will not materially reduce the fair market value of abuttino properties: 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect are compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect ar~ not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater: 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect will uPQrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. The desion of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole: 8. Flexibilitv in reQard to lot width, required setbacks. height and off- street parkino are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 4 Ordinance No. 6417-99 9. AdeQuate off-street parkina in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parkinQ in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Section 5. Article 2, Zoning Districts, Table 2-1104, "MU" Mixed Use District Flexible Development Standards is hereby amended to add "Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project" as a Flexible Use with the following flexibility criteria and renumbering the subsequent sub-sections as appropriate: B. Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical withold! deviations from the use, intensity and development standards-.:. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect will not materially reduce the faIr market value of abuttino properties: 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect are compatible with adiacent land uses: S. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater: 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole: 8. Flexibility in reQard to lot width. reQuired setbacks, height and off- street parkino are iustified bv the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 5 Ordinance No. 6417.99 9. Adequate off-street parkina in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parkinQ formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parkinQ in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Section 6. Article 2, Zoning Districts, Table 2-1204, "I" Institutional District Flexible Development Standards is hereby amended to add "Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project" as a Flexible Use with the following flexibility criteria: B. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive infill Redevelopment Proiect will not materially reduce the fair market value of abuttinQ properties; ~~, 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect are otherwise permitted in the C itv of Clearwater: 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect are compatible with adiacent land uses; 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater: 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. The desian of the proposed Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Proiect creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole: 8. Flexibility in reoard to lot width. required setbacks, heiQht and off- street parkina are iustified bv the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole: 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity accordinQ to the shared parkina formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6 Ordinance No. 6417-99 Section 7. Article 2, Zoning Districts. Table 2-1304, "IRT" District Flexible Development Standards is hereby amended to add "Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project" as a Flexible Use with the following flexibility criteria and renumbering the subsequent sub-sections as appropriate: C. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect: 1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use. intensity anq. development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect will not materially reduce the fair market value of abuttinQ properties; 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; .1" 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect are compatible with adiacent land uses; 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Compretlensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater; 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Proiect will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proP9sed for development: 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive fnfill Redevelopment Proiect creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole: 8. Flexibility in reQard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parkinQ are iustified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole~ 9. AdeQuate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parkinQ formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parkinQ in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Section 8. Article 3. Section 3-1205 0.3.e. No Credit for required landscaping. is hereby retitled "Credit for Required Landscaping" and amended to read as follows: e. Ne credit for required landscaping. Any landscaping required to be installed by Section 3-1202 or 3-1203 shall not may be used as credit against tree replacement requirements. 7 Ordinance No. 6417-99 Section 9. Article 3. Section 3-15038. Nuisances, is hereby amended to add two additional conditions declared to constitute public nuisances and to read as follows: 7. Excessive Qrowth or accumulation of weeds, Qrass, underQrowth or other similar plant materials. reachino a height or more than twelve (12) inches, or the accumulation of debris upon property within the City of Clearwater. 8. The lack of maintenance bv a property owner of property abuttinq any dedicated riQht-of-way in the City in a condition such that weeds or trash are found in and on the riQht-of-way or such that the weeds or trash extend over the sidewalk. bicycle path, curbline or edQe of pavement of an improved riQht-of-wav by more than four inches (4nl 7.~. Any other condition or use that constitutes a nuisance to the public, generally, which is continually or repeatedly maintained, the abatement of which would be in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City. Section 10. Article 3, Section 3-1505. Prohibited Accumulations, is hereby deleted in its entirety and the section reserved. Section 11. Article 3, Division 18, Signs is hereby amended as follows: Section 3-1806 8. 1. a is hereby amended to read as follows: CIa. One (1) freestanding sign per parcel proposed for development with no more than two (2) sign faces. A parcel located at a corner may be permitted two {2} siQns, one on each street frontaqe. provided that the maximum area of the siQn faces of the two signs shall not exceed the total maximum allowable area." Section 3-1806 8. 1. b is hereby amended to read as follows: lib. All freestanding signs shall be setback at least ten (10) five (5} feet from the property lines of the parcel proposed for development. tJ Section 3-1806 8.2.a is hereby amended to read as follows: "a. One (1) attached sign per business establishment. The area of an attached sign face shall not exceed: i. one (1) square foot per one hundred (100) square feet of building fa9Cide facing the street frontage; or ii. twenty -four (24) square feet; whichever is less. However. a minimum of ten (10) square feet per business establishment with a principal exterior entrance shall be allowed. n 8 Ordinance No. 6417-99 Section 3-1806 B.2.c is hereby deleted in its entirety and the subsequent sub-section is hereby renumbered as follows: c. Attached signs with a sign face of gre3ter than sixteen (16) square feot shall not bo located within the highest one quarter (1/4) of the fa~de of a buil~ G-c. Business log05 or other symbols shall not exceed twenty-five percent (250/0) of any attached sign face. Section 3-1807 C. 2.. Comprehensive Sign Program. Flexibility Criteria, is hereby amended by revising the maximum height for all signs from twelve (12) feet to fourteen (14) feet as follows: - ,': . ,1: . ,..-., ":",:~..J", 4\'J' . ,", .....'r:...-..... . ,''to' . .)'. ' ,,'. ';.,.:': 'Y' , : ,.:, \ '. ;' . ',', ,... . ~'.."~-t,~. ~\,,,,,... '~\ _,,'_I '. "J'~ 2. Height. The maximum height of all signs proposed in a Comprehensive Sign Program is tv:elvo (12) fourteen (14) feet provided however that a single attached sign with a sign face of no more than twelve (12) square feet may be erected up to the height of the principal building. Section 3-1807 C. 3., Comprehensive Sign Program by revising the sub- section to read as follows: "3. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Sign Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off at 12 midnight or when the business is closed, whichever is later." _ Section 12. Section 4-204.2., Occupancy Permit, is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. No occupancy permit shall be issued unless it has been determined that the building or structure and the site complies with the provisions of the Building Code, this Development Code and all prior approvals upon which the building . permit was based_ Section 13. Article 6, Nonconformity Provisions, is hereby amended by adding a new Section 6-110 entitled "Nonconformities Created as a Result of Eminent Domain" to read as follows: "Section 6-110. Domain. Nonconformities Created as a Result of Eminent A. In the event that an eminent domain action creates a nonconforming structure. such nonconforming structure may remain as a legal nonconforming structure provided that all other regulations of this code regarding nonconforming structures are met. This section shall not be applicable to single family detached and attached dwellings. B. In the event that an eminent domain action renders a site nonconforming with respect to the development standards of this code, the property shall be required to comply with the development standards to the maximum degree physically and financially feasible as determined by the Community Development Coordinator. The Community Development Coordinator may require mitigation and/or improvements to the site that are related to the specific conditions of the site. that adequatelv improve the public safety issues of the site and which implement the purposes of this code. C. All other nonconformities created as a result of eminent domain shall be governed by the provisions of this article. II 9 Ordinance No. 6417-99 .. f'. . .. . _ _ " # .' . .u.. . . ...:' ~.\ , , . . 'Of ' . . ", ",.' ,t" , . I . . . . ' . '...' .,..... --. . .... ... ,.'.~ ~,,;. ; ~ Section 14. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, except that Section 1 shall take effect as of the effective date of Section 1-106 as specified in- Ordinance No. 6348-99. PASSED ON FIRST READING Au~ust 5, 1999 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall- id s Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 10 Ordinance No. 6417-99 J Yld ~ . ORDINANCE NO. 6437-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL.ORIDA, RELATING TO PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.21 TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "SAFE BATHING LIMIT" AND TO INCLUDE DEFINITIONS OF "PUBLIC BEACH" AND "SAND KEY PUBLIC BEACH"; AMENDING SECTION 22.22, RElATING TO RULES AND REGULATIONS ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.28, RELATING TO PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION OF PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.31, RELATiNG TO THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.33 TO PROHIBIT SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.38 TO PROHIBIT CAMPING ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.39, RELATING TO HUNTING AND FIREARMS ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.40 TO PROHIBIT PETS ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.42, RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATION ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING 22.46 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING 22.47 TO PROHIBIT AIRCRAFT ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.49, RELATING TO DANGEROUS GAMES ON PUBLIC BATHING BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.50 TO PROHIBIT GOLF ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.51 TO RESTRICT CERTAIN TYPES OF PHOTOGRAPHY ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.53 TO PROHIBIT MERCHANDISING, VENDING, AND PEDD~ING ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.55 TO REGULATE SPECIAL EVENTS ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.56 TO PROHIBIT FIREWORKS AND EXPLOSIVES ON PUBLIC BEACHES; AMENDING SECTION 22.57 TO PROHIBIT INTOXICATED INDIVIDUALS ON PUBLIC BEACHES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: 13 Ordinance 6437-99 ". Section 1. Section 22.21, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec.22.21. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: ***** Public Beach means the public bathing beaches and the Sand Kev Public Beach. Safe bathing limit means the swimming or bathing area between the shoreline and a point 300 feet offshore, that is which arS3 m3Y be marked by buoys or other similar devices and that is described in section 33.114. **'*** Sand Key Public Beach means that portion of sandy beach within the corporate limits of the City of Clearwater lying landward of the shoreline and seaward of the erosion control line established pursuant to Chapter 161. Florida Statutes (1997). by the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund as part of the Sand Key Phase IV Beach Restoration Proiect. Section 2. Section 22.22, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.22. Necessity for rules and regulations. " It is the responsibility of each person to conduct recreational activities in such a manner so as to prevent injury or loss of life to any person; therefore, it is necessary to prescribe rules and regulations to govern recreational activities in the park areas and on public b:lthing beaches. 2 Ordinance 6437..99 Section 3. Section 22.28, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.28. Protection and preservation of property. ***** (3) No unauthorized person shall transplant or remove from any park area or public beach any be3Gh sand whether submerged or not or any soil, rock, stones, trees, shrubs, plants, seeds, flowers, fruits, nuts, down timber or other wood materials; make any excavation by tool, equipment, blasting or other means or agency; construct or erect any buildings or structures of whatever kind whether permanent or temporary in character; or run or string any public service utility into, upon or across such lands. Exceptions shall be permitted for minor excavations involving the recovery of lost artifacts on the public beaches or public parks, provided such minor excavations are immediately refilled and no safety hazards to the public are created. Section 4. Section 22.31, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.31. Protection and preservation of wildlife. (1) No unauthorized person shall molest, harm, frighten, kill, net, trap, snare, hunt, chase, shoot or throw or propel by any means missiles at any wildlife creature whether it is mammal, aquatic or marine life or a bird or a reptile roaming free about the public beach or park eF-in captivi~' in 3 cage. No unauthorized person shall remove or possess in any public beach or park the young of any wild animal or the nest or eggs of any reptile or bird or collect, remove, or possess, give away, sell or offer to sell, buy or offer to buy or accept as a gift any such specimen, dead or alive. (2) No unauthorized person shall place, dump, abandon Of' leave any fish, mammal, reptile, or bird, either wild or domestic, on a public beach or park property. Section 5. Section 22.33, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.33. Bathing and Swimming Areas. ***** (2) No person shall carry, transport, or cause to be transported any glassware, bottles or any other potentially dangerous or sharp objects onto any public beach, or into any bathing, wading, or swimming pool areas of a public beach or park. (3) No person shall frequent any park waters or public bathing beach for the purpose of swimming or bathing except between such hours of the day as shall be designated and posted by the department for such purposes for each individual area. (4) Persons using public bathing beaches shall obey all rules posed by marine department personnel and other rules affecting beach use and water safety which are implemented as the situation dictates. 3 Ordinance 6437-99 (5) Illegal drugs and all alcoholic beverages are prohibited on any public bathing beach. (6) Hard surf3cod objoots ~uch 3& ckim boards, Ssurfboards, sailboats, motorboats, personal watercraft, or singular hard-surfaced objects are not permitted to be beached on any public bathing beach or to be operated within safe bathing limits associated therewith unless authorized. (7) Open fires, grills or other cooking or heating devices are not pennitted on any public b3thin9 beach. .... . (8) Public bathiAg beaches and swimming areas safa bathing limits associated therewith may be closed to the public and bathing prohibited when, In the opinion of the harbormaster, use of such areas is considered dangerous due to weather, surf or other conditions. Section 6. Section 22.38, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.38. Camping. (1) No person shall set up tents, shacks or any other temporary shelters, or any special vehicle to be used or that could be used for such purpose, such as a house traifer, camp trailer, camp wagon or the like on any public beach or park property for the purpose of overnight camping except within such areas as may have been provided for such use and except as authorized. ***** (3) No person shall sleep on iR any public beach o~ park property that whish has not been designated for the purpose of overnight camping or as authorized between 11 :00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Section 7. Section 22.33, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.39. Hunting and firearms. (1) No unauthorized person shall openly carry, use or possess firearms of any description, air rifles, pistols, rifles, spring guns, bows and arrows, slingshots, boomerangs, or any other form of weapon potentially dangerous to wildlife or human safety on 9f-iR any public beach or park area ~fE)perty except at and in accordance with the rules and regulations as a participant in a program sponsored by the department. 4 Ordinance 6437-99 (2) No unauthorized person shall hunt, trap, or pursue wildlife by any means or method whatsoever on iR any public beach or park area. Section 8. Section 22.40, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.40. Domestic Animals. ***** (3) All pets shall be excluded from all public bathing beaches, public pools, and swimming areas abutting public b3thing beaches and parks. Section 9. Section 22.42, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.42. Traffic regulations. J' .' ., ,... ~ .....,.. ' . . ," . f . " ','t 'j } " , , " " t ,.." Applicable state vehicle traffic laws as contained in F.S. ch. 316 shall apply in and about all park property and public batniRg beaches, and in addition thereto the following rules shall be applicable on roads and driveways within parks: ***** (6) No unauthorized person shall drive, operate, control, or propel any vehicle on any public bathing beach at aOny time. Section 10. Section 22.45, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.46. Parking. ***** (4) No person shall park any vehicle at any time on any public 9atI:liAg- beach proporty. Section 11. Section 22.47, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.47. Aircraft. ***** (3) No person shall take off, land or otherwise operate any aircraft in or over any safe bathing limits associated with any public bathing beach. Section 12. Section 22.33, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.49. Dangerous games. No person or persons shall engage in rough or potentially dangerous games or practice for such games such as football, baseball, softball, horseshoes, tennis, volleyball, badminton, or any other games, practices or exercise involving thrown or otherwise propelled objects such as balls, stones, arrows, javelins, shuttlecocks, frisbees, model aircraft or roller skates on at any public bathing beach or park property oper-atod by the ci~. except in the areas set aside for that purpose cuitablo for such r 'f 30 IVI IOE. Section 13. Section 22.50, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.50. Golf. No person shall play goJf or use golf balls and clubs within the park areas or on the public bathing beaches except in areas set aside for that purpose. . 5 Ordinance 6437-99 .'i..;: Section 14. Section 22.51, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.51. Photography. (1) No person shall without prior authorization from the department make still or moving pictures that involve the use of special settings, structures, lighting or apparatus, or the performance of a cast of persons, either amateur or professional.a-Q.[ the posing of professional models. on any public beach or on any park property. However. the provisions of this section do not in any way restrict the use of cameras by amateur photographers or professionals not using set scenery. casts or models. 6 Ordinance 6437-99 (2) Bona fide newspaper, press association, newsreel and/or television news department personnel, identified by press cards or passes and assigned by their respective editors to make photographs for use of such communications media, will be allowed on public beaches and in parks for such purpose~. Section 15. Section 22.53, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.53. Merchandising, vending, peddling. No person other than the department or regularly licensed concessionaires acting by and under the authority of the city shall expose or offer for sale, rent or trade any article, service or thing or station or place any stand, cart or vehicle for the transportation, sale or display of any article or merchandise within the limits of any public beach or park or r~crootion aroa except by written authorization from the department. Section 16. Section 22.55, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.55. Special events, public assemblies. (1) Sports events, pageants, entertainments, and similar productions characterized ss public spectator attractions are allowed on public beaches and in parks provided authorization is given in compliance with article III of this chapter. ***** (4) No public address system or electrical amplification will be permitted on public beaches or in park areas except by special permit. Section 17. Section 22.56, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.56. Fireworks and explosives. No person shall without prior authorization bring into or have in his possession or set off or otherwise cause to explode on fA any public beach or park area any fireworks ,."~ .", p _ 't ;"":." .' or explosives of inflammable material or any substance, compound, mixture, or article that, in conjunction with any other substance or compound, may-explode, discharge, or burn. Section 18. Section 22.57, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 22.5T.lntoxlcatlng substances. No person under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs will be permitted entry to a public beach or park~ propertioo and any person so doing, if discovered therein, will be subject to immediate expulsion and/or suspension. Section 19. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED August 5. 1999 Brian J. Aungst, Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Q Robert J urette Assistan ity Attorney Cynthia E, Goudeau City Clerk 7 Ordinance 6437-99 ~n~ fZ l~ ORDINANCE NO. 6438-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, RELATING TO FINES FOR ILLEGALLY PARKING IN A PARKING SPACE DESIGNATED FOR PERSONS WHO HAVE DISABILITIES; AMENDING SECTION 30.061 (7) TO INCREASE THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF DISABLED PERMIT ONLY PARKING; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CllY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Subsection (7) of section 30.061, Code of Ordinances. is amended to read as follows: Sec. 30.061. Fines. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this article shall be subject, upon conviction, to a fine as follows: (1) Overtime parking, whether metered or unmetered $ 10.00 (2) Improper parking 15.00 (3) Double parking 15.00 (4) No parking 20ne. including but not limited to parking without permit, near fireplug. in reserved space, in alley, on sidewalk, near railroad. near intersection, in driveway, loading zone, over curb in parkway 15.00 (5) Motor running, no attendant 10.00 (6) Keys in ignition 10.00 (7) Stooping. standing. or parking a vehicle within a parking space designated for persons who have disabilities without displaying a disabled parking permit Hondicap p3rking SP::\G6 250.00 100.00 (8) Any other violation of this article 15.00 Ordinance No. 6438-99 - - ", -,''l,,;;''''l,U: '~Js~.. .~~~.....,.,... n".. """",~,,~,.,,~,:," "'" . IL( /- (9) In addition to the other penalties provided for herein there is hereby imposed a surcharge of $5.00 on all parking fines to be used for funding a school crossing guard program. This surcharge shall be paid by the clerk of the circuit court into the school crossing guard trust fund, a special revenue fund maintained by the city. Funds collected from this surcharge shall be distributed quarterly to fund a school crossing guard program as authorized by Section 316.660(3), Florida Statutes (1992 Supp.). Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING August 5, 1999 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Robert J. rette Assistant ity Attorney 2 Ordinance No. 6438-99 .~: . ,~...... - " \ " . ~ ~ "'{ r. ,- . ~, , ,'.. ".Of I . IS. CITY OF CLEARWATER INTEROFFICE MEMO To: Mayor and City Commissioners From: George E. McKibben, Purchasing Manager Copies: Michael J. Roberto, City Manager Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Subject: Purchases to be approved at the August 19, 1999 City Commission Meeting Date: July 20, 1999 A. The following items are purchases included in the approved 1998/99 budget. All recommended vendors are the lowest most responsive bidders in accordance with the specifications unless a specific exception is noted. 1. Extend the contract with Central Parking Systems, Tampa, Florida, in the estimated amount of $325,000, for month to month parking system services at Clearwater Beach ending September 30, 2000. Exception to bid under Section 2.564 (l)(e), Code of Ordinances - Impractical to bid due to anticipated monthly changes to parking services requirements next fiscal year. Appropriation code: 435-013333- 530300-545-000. (Public Works Administration) 2. Extend the contract period with Volt Sciences, Inc., New Port Richey, Florida, from the current expiration of September 30, 1999 to December 31, 1999, for installation of gas mains and services at various locations throughout the gas system. Adequate funding for the revised contract was approved September 17, 1998. Appropriation codes: 353-96310 (Pasco County) and 353-96314 (Pinellas County) (Clearwater Gas System) 3 . Award a contract to Pinellas County Solid waste Managelnent Department, Saint Petersburg, Florida in the estimated amount of $26,000, for solid waste disposal utilized by Parks and Recreation during the contract period August 20, 1999 through September 30, 2000. Exception to bid under Section 2.564 (1 )(d), Code of Ordinances - Other governmental service. Appropriation code: 010-01691-543500-572-000. (Quality of Life Administration) 4. Extend the contract with Jimmie's Wrecker Service, Clearwater, Florida, in the estimated amount of $55,000, for towing services during the contract period November 1, 1999 through October 31,2000. This is the second and final extension authorized under the terms of the Clearwater bid. Appropriation code: 566-06611-530100-519-000. (General Support Services Administration) 5. Extend the contract with Genuine Parts Company, Tampa, Florida, in the estimated amount of $850,000 for motor vehicle equipment parts and services during the contract period August 22, 1999 through September 21,2000. This is the first extension authorized under the terms of the Clearwater bid. Appropriation code: 566-06611-550600-519-000. (General Support Services Administration) Funding for the above referenced purchases is included in the FY 1998/99 Budget. Additional funding needed for debt service, FY 1999/2000 or other contract periods will be requested in the appropriate departmental budgets as recommended by the City Manager. TWO Tina Wilson, Budget Director t,~~ .... ......' :: ..~;:;/;:, ;':,..:>' .;' <.. .. <;.<~ ::~'; .;..:.;: ; >.:..:, :/,: ; .....L .....'. .:::.~,: .:':' ::'.~. . :' :.)<.:> '. ". .\:,:i . . ':n' '..', " ' , ' ...J . '.. . ", I'."" , \ " I , ' ...,! I ",. ": ' Meeting Date: _lG ~.,9.9\ (8 ED~ Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # SU B JEeT /RECOMMEN DATION: Approve Interlocal Agreement between the City of Clearwater and Pinellas County providing for the joint management of an Economic Analysis for the north central portion of the City commonly referred to as the Hercules industrial area, in the amount of $12,500.00, and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The City and Pinellas County have agreed to combine efforts to create a framework for redevelopment strategies in the Hercules industrial area. The City and Pinellas County have agreed to jointly issue a Request for Proposal including the selection of the consultant who will assist in conducting economic impact studies to determine the impact of the redevelopment of the area on the City and Pi nellas County. The City and Pinellas County have each agreed to provide $12,500.00 towards the payment of the fees and costs of this phase of the project. Agreement available for review in City Clerk Department Submitted by: City Manager Printed on recycled paper Originating Dept: Costs $12,500.00 NA Economic Dev. Total NA User Dept. Funding Source: $12,500.00 Economic Development Capliallmprovement Current Fiscal Year NA Attachments Dperating X ,/ Dther Appropriation Code: 010-0921&-530100-552-000 --..! o None Reviewed by: Legal ~ Budget J Pure has . Risk M Rev. 2/98 ,.... . -/'~ '~:__".":". "''':, :~ir~:, ..~~ "'-,:,'i '-'. ......................... /: .,...-....,.\.::.:'. . ,.::', i, . ~. t't ,'. , .~_._.. >'. .,'.'.. ',.. \,. '~I~.,: \ I' ': .... r' .......... '~" ~t I ,,- ED~ \Cp INTERLOCAlAGREEMENT THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. entered into this day of ,1999, by and between PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, (hereinafter referred as "COUNTY"). and CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, (hereinafter referred to as "CITY). WHEREAS, the COUNTY and CITY desire to jointly issue a Request for Proposal (see Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference) to invite prospective consultants an opportunity to submit proposals to provide economic analysis/strategic planning services related to the redevelopment of the Hercules Industrial Area; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY and CITY agree to jointly administer the Request for Proposal process, up to and including the selection of the consultant which meets the criteria as set forth in same. NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Scope. COUNTY and CITY agree to jointly administer the Request for Proposal pursuant to the terms and conditions as set forth in attached Exhibit uA". 2. Selection. COUNTY and CITY shall select a consultant based on the attached Request for Proposal and consultant's response to same. If COUNTY and CITY cannot agree on consultant, then this Agreement is void without further obligation of either party. If COUNTY and CITY agree on a consultant, then this Agreement authorizes the Administrator for each party to enter into an agreement with consultant under the terms described herein. 3. Term. The term of this Interlocal Agreement shall be for one (1) year commencing September 6. 1999 and ending September 5, 2000. 4. Cost. The total cost will not exceed $25,000, of which $12,500 will come from the COUNTY and $12,500will come from the CITY. 5. Notice. Either party may cancel this Agreement by giving the other party thirty (30) days written notice delivered or mailed as follows: Cou nty: Richard R. David, Chief of Staff Pinellas County Economic Development 14010 Roosevelt Boulevard Suite 704 Clearwater. Florida 33662 C,n ~ ~,":_ . ":':'i .<,~": ;.':\,':'~~> ,:;', <: '<:..L :';:',';".:.<::': , . ,-,", .' w " ..' \' ' '.' I ,. " " . .. . ",~ City: Robert Keller, Assistant City Manager Director of Economic Development City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 6. Entire Agreement This document embodies the whole agreement of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions or allegations other than those contained herein. This agreement shall be binding on the parties, their successors, assigns and legal representatives. 7. Filing Effective Date. As required by Section 163.01 (11), Florida Statutes, this Interloeal Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida, after execution by the parties and shall take effect upon the date of filing. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above. PINELLAS COUN1Y By: Fred Marquis County Administrator Approved as to form: Attest: Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner By: Michael J. Roberto City Manager Approved as to form: Attest: John Carassas Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk .J , . ;i.,.. ............. ..:,..d,:......~...... ...................:.'...:.............> ...~: CITY OF CLEARW A TER& PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ECONOMIC ANAL YSIS/STRA TEGICPLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES 1. INTRODUCTION The Clearwater City Commission has prepared a Vision Statelnent that includes a strong commitment to quality economic development and the continued growth of business. Similarly, the Pine lIas County Commission has articulated that economic development is of the highest priority in Pinellas County. Both governments have intensified their commitment of resources to the creation of wealth and jobs that support families. Economic development within the City of Clearwater concentrates redevelopment because the City is virtually built out. The most recent areas in which the City has concentrated its redevelopment efforts are the Downtown and the Brownfields areas. In addition, another area of Clearwater which is in need of immediate assistance for a redevelopment strategy is in the north central portion of the City commonly referred to as the Hercules Industrial Area. This area (see attached map for general boundaries) contains land which lies in part in the City of Cleanvater and in part in unincorporated Pinellas County. This fact demands special sensitivity to land planning, infrastructure, taxation and political considerations. The economic development staffs from both the City of Clearwater and Pinellas County (hereafter City & County) have agreed to combine their efforts to create a unified framework for redevelopment strategies in the Hercules Industrial Area. Decisions which commit resources to this redevelopment effort in the Hercules Industrial Area have far-reaching impacts on the community's financial position.. tax structur~, and overall economy. As a result, the City & County are welcoming proposals from consultants who can impart knowledgeable advice to decision makers in this endeavor. 2. GENERAL PURPOSE The City & County are seeking responses from qualified professionals for the following: Retaining consulting services for assistance in the creation of economic redevelopment strategies for the Hercules Industrial Area. The consultant firm will be expected to sign a contract with the City & County for a negotiated fee. The consultant firm selected will be used and reimbursed on a case by case basis. The total reimbursement is not to exceed $25,000.00 without amendment and approval by the City & County Commissions. 1 ~I,:';" ' ,". ',' \". ,.," .". '. .': I. ".,~' , ~~- '_'." ~,~~,::.: :'~_, \,"" ';'," -7">-': .', '_, 4 ' ..., . 'r'" 4,' -','"",. I~ ,.-t',""!,..t~ The City & County will select and negotiate with the firm whose proposal is the most responsive to the RFP and in the best interest of the City & County. Qualiticationssubmitted in response to this RFP must provide sufficient detail and information to complete an evaluation of their merit. The instructions contained herein must be followed to be considered responsive to this RFP. The City & County reserve the right to reject any or all responses. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES The qualified and experienced economic development consulting firm will be on retainer to assist in the creation of an economic redevelopment strategy for the Hercules Industrial Area. The Consultant services shall begin upon execution of the Standard Consultant Agreement and extend for one (1) year, with optional one year extensions at the request of the City & County. Potential services include, but are not limited to, the following: Assist in the development of baseline information on the existingcommerciallindustrialbusinesses located in the Hercules Industrial Area. Analysis of the market potential of the area. Initial analysis of planning and regulatory issues and recommendations for a strategic approach to redevelopment of the area. Recommend and assist in the redevelopment strategies that will address the market needs. Assist in conducting economic impact studies to determine the impact of the redevelopment of the area on the City & County. Assist with financial projection s of estimated funding requirements. Assist in identifying alternative funding sources for redevelopment of the area. Provide advice on examining prospective financial information, evaluating alternative funding approaches and strategies and assisting in the coordination of the financing process. Assistance to ensure accurately reported financial information. Assist in developing business, market, and operation plans to detennine how the redevelopment project should be structured and operated. 4. RFP RANKING Proposal ranking results will be announced and all responses shall be a matter of public record. Criteria for evaluation are set forth in Section 22 of this document. These criteria wiil be used by the City & County to determine, in its judgment, the proposals it deems to be in its best interest. Negotiations will proceed, ifat all, with the responsible ranked firm whose proposal is determined 2 . '. ,,'- ,,'._: . '. ." < ".' :'3". ,: '.. ...... ,~,::. . :'~':::: <,~.,-' .'. ' ",:: - . . , . .. .1....=.. .' . .- . ~ - . -. , ", . ." --. " ., 4 ' _ "" "" " . .' . t \.,1~', .~_.'./ ',.:~',.I "'" _ .............\".~.,~. '/:'_'l,.~,.,I,.: _.l._.;.....t..~...,., '" .'.,'\.; ~ '.::;'~"f :....~.......;,.:..\:' by the City & County to be in its best interest. The City & County reserve the right to reject any or all responses with or Vlithoutcause. 5. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION Qualified firms are invited to notify the City of Clearwater of their interest in this project and to submit six (6) copies of the information required in Sections 17-20, showing the qualifications of your firm, and your firms proposal to the address below by the required date. Additional response forms and non-technical information may be obtained from George McKibben, City Purchasing Manager, (727) 562-4634. MAIL OR DELIVER COMPLETED RESPONSES TO: George McKibben City Purchasing Manager Municipal Services Building 100 South Myrtle Avenue (3rd floor) Clearwater, FL 33756 Mailing address: PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 The delivery of the responses to the City of Clearwater Purchasing Office prior to the spedfied date and time is solely and strictly the responsibi lity of the responding firm. The City shall not, under any circumstances, be responsible for delays caused by the United States Postal Service or any private delivery service, or for other delays. All responses must be manually and duly signed by an authorized corporate officer, principal, or partner with the authority to bind said firm. All responses must be marked on the outside: "Request to Provide Professional Consultant Services" for the City of Clearwater, Florida To be opened at 4:00 PM, EDT, August 30, 1999. Each respondent is solely responsible for reading and completely understanding the requirements of this RFP. The opening time shall be and must be scrupulously observed. Under no circumstance will responses delivered after the specified delivery time be considered. Late submissions shall be returned unopened to the finn with the notation "The response Vias received after the delivery time designated for the receipt and opening of the responses." All responses shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the provisions of this RFP. However, the City & County may waive any informalities, irregularitIes, or variances, whether technical or substantial in nature, or reject any and all responses at its discretion. Any responses may be withdrawn prior to the indicated time for opening of the responses or authorized proponent thereof. 3 " ,,~:~:~.;~." .....~,../:.{. ........ .L"";' ........... ......... .... ..' "..:., ..:....<..... ," . ~" .. .... . '. .. '. ::-.'.... Pi" 6. INQUIRIES AND ADDENDA Each firm shall examine all RFP documents and shall judge all matter relating to the adequacy and accuracy of such documents. Any inquiries, suggestions or requests concerning interpretation, clarification, or additional information pertaining to the RFP shaH be made in writing a minimum of five (5) working days prior to due date through the City of Clearwater's Purchasing Manager, George McKibben, at PO Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748; or FAX (727) 562-4635. The City & County shall not be responsible for oral interpretations given by any City and/or County employee, representative, or others. The issuance of a written addendum is the only official method whereby interpretation, clarification, or additional information may be given. If any addenda are issued to this RFP, the City & County will attempt to notify all prospective firms who have secured same. However, it shall be the responsibility of each firm, prior to submitting the proposal, to contact the City of Clearwater's Purchasing Manager (727) 562-4634 to determine if addenda were issued and to make such addenda a part of the proposal. 7. RESPONDER PREPARATION EXPENSES Each responder preparing a response to this request shall bear all expenses associated with their preparation. Firms shall prepare a response with the understanding that no claims for reimbursementshall be submitted to the City & County for the expense of preparation or presentation. 8. OPENNESS OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS Written responses, other submissions, correspondence, and all records made thereof, as well as, negotiations conducted pursuant to this request, shall be handled in compliance with Chapters 119 and 286, Florida Statutes. The City & County give no assurance as to the confidentiality of any portion of the response once submitted. 9. ERRORS AND OMMISSIONS Once a competitive response is submitted, the City & County shall not accept any request by any proposer to correct errors or omissions in any calculations or competitive price submitted. 10. INFORMALITY W AIVERlREJECTION OF BIDS The City & County reserve the right to reject any or all responses and to waive any irregularity, variance or informality whether technical or substantial in nature, in keeping wi th the best interest of the City & County. 11. TIME SCHEDULE The City & County will utilize the following time table with the goal of selection. This schedule may be altered solely at the discretion of the City & County. 4 ',' :.. < , ' ...' .: -' .:. ;: <'. . .. .......:. . .... ...., _::., ,,: ;p,> ,.' ....~........... ..................:......:...'... ,. - -..... ...... . . ,.,.' ~. ..,. '1$.... " ,"," .....',-', _.f' ' '\, ' ,','~~, ~./'. ,~"',' .'.,'.."" I,',' ... " 'fr'. ........ July 30, 1999: Release Date August 30, 1999: RFP Openings - 4:00 PM, 100 So. Myrtle Avenue, Purchasing Room #342, Clearwater, FL Week of August 30, 1999: Selection of Firms for Oral Presentation/Interviews (IF NECESSARY) September 6-1 0, 1999: Oral Presentations to Evaluation Committee (IF NECESSARY) September 10, 1999: Rank firms (Evaluation committee) Week of September 15, 1999: Negotiate Contract September 20, 1999: A ward of contract 12. PRESENTATION After the initial submittals have been reviewed, the top three firms may be asked to appear for a presentation before City & County personnel to answer additional questions. 13. RIGHT TO PROTEST Any actual bidder who is aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or award of a contract may seek resolution ofhislher complaints by contacting the Purchasing Manager, and ifnot satisfied, with the City Manager. A protest with respect to the specifications of an invitation for bid or request for proposals shall be submitted in writing a minimum of five (5) work days of the notice of intent to award. Exceptions may be granted if the aggrieved person could not have been reasonably expected to have knowledge of the facts giving rise to such protest prior to the bid opening or the closing date for proposals. 14. NO COLLUSION By offering a submission to the RFP, the respondent certifies that the respondent has not divulged to, discussed or compared hislher competitive response with other responders and has not colluded with any other responders or parties to this competitive response whatsoever. 15. APPROPRIATIONS CLAUSE The City & County, as entities of government, are subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract for each and every fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the contact is executed and entered into and for which the contract shall remain in etfect. The City & County shall, upon recei pt of notice that sufficient funds are not available to continue its full 5 and faithful perfonnance of the contract provide prompt written notice to the Contractor of such event and effective thirty (30) days after giving such notice or upon the expiration of the period of time for which funds were appropriated, whichever comes first, be thereafter released of all further obligations in any way related to the contract. 16. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF PROPOSALS All proposers submitting responses shall provide sufficient information and data to fully allow a complete evaluation of the competitive proposal to be made. Infonnationand data submitted by each proposer may become a part of the proposal. Six (6) copies of the proposal must be submitted. If, through any cause, the firm fails to fulfill in timely and proper manner the obligations it has assumed, the City & County reserve the right to terminate the contract by specifying the date of termination in writing to the firm at least thirty (30) working days before the termination date. Any agreement or contract that results from acceptance of a proposal must be on forms either supplied by or approved by the City & County and must contain, as a minimum, applicable provisions contained in the RFP. The firms shall not assign or transfer any interest in the contract without the prior written consent of the City & County. No reports, information or data given to or prepared by the firm under the contract shall be made available to any indi vidual or organization by the firm without the prior written approval of the City & County. 17. INSURANCE REQUIRMENTS See Exhibit A. 18. QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM Indicate size of firm, organizational structure, location of management and charter authorization and licenses to do business in the State of Florida. Describe in general your firm's national, statewide and local service capabilities. Describe resources available to your firm such as computer capability, access to market information, personnel with specialized knowledge and legal expertise in the applicable fields. Describe your firm's experience in serving as an economic analysis and strategic planning consultant to local government units. Indicate your firm's experience in dealing with economic development projects during the past two years, including the extent to which governmental clients were involved. Describe any innovations that your firms has developed or has been involved with in the area of the 6 ~;.r ',''''''.' '. ."..... I r.., ': J~' , :,t, j'."" ~."'" t., t . .,\ , .' ...'. " " '.:. .,'..I~.:'~. .~...,.. i"'; ''',., .~.,',l,~:,;" economic redevelopment. Indicate the capability of your firm to hold harmless, indemnify and defend the City & County for losses, costs and expenses arising from liability claims resulting from alleged negligence of your firm, its officers, employees and subcontractors; describe liability insurance coverage carried by your firm. 19. FIRM PERSONNEL List personnel to be assigned to the City & County engagement, both primary and backup personnel. Please include resumes. 20. CONTRACT AND COMPENSATION Please furnish a proposed contract inc I uding fee proposals. Describe the firm's proposed fee schedule for the proposed services and for various alternative financing methods. Indicate your firm" s po Hcy regarding out-of-po~ket and or indirect cost expenses; if your fiml proposes reimbursement from the City & County, please itemize the types of expenses and basis filling for each. 21. COMPLETENESS OF COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS Following the receipt of competitive proposals, the City & County shall review all proposals with respect to completeness and conformance with the instructions and requirements specifically indicated in this RFP. Proposals which are deemed incomplete and/or non-conforming with instructions and requirements of this RFP may not be given further evaluation. The City & County reserve the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive any irregulari ty, variance, or informality whether technical or substantial in nature, in keeping with the best interest of the City & County. 22. SELECTION CRITERIA This evaluation and ranking of all competitive proposals received shall be accomplished utilizing the criteria described in this Section. Information and data included in the Consultant" s proposal shall be considered in the evaluation and ranking process. All proposals shall be evaluated with respect to the completeness of the data provided, support for all claims made, and the overall approach taken. The following criteria shall be utilized in the evaluation 0 f the proposals: Organization, size, structure and technical resources of the firm, and the qualifications and availability of key personnel to be assigned to the City & County. 300/0 Knowledge of the general character and environment of the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County and other Florida municipalities, including successful experience servicing local govemments in 7 t- - . '.- . " . ~ ... ~ .. ~'. '~ I.', '. .". :. . : .., ',~', .,,", L I"'. ", ..,. , y'-- ",J.. . .. t: , ' " . ~ :- ;'"'"' - Florida. 1 00/0 Experience in dealing with investors, financial institutions, private businesses and municipal bond credi t enhancel~~. 10% Experience in the areas of economic analysis, data collection, redevelopment projects and strategic planning. 30% Experience in dealing with multiple jurisdictions, collaborative land planning and infrastructure. 10% Innovative features and use of these features by current and past clients. 10% 23. FEES AND CONTRACT LANGUAGE .An evaluation will be made of the cost and fees, as well as contract language proposed, to meet the terms and conditions of this RFP. 24. REFERENCES References may be called regarding the level of satisfaction with services rendered by the proposing finn, technical abil i ty, cost, education of and presentation to governing bodies. 25. NEGOTIATIONS Following the ranking of the proposals reviewed, the Selection Committee shall designate the top ranked firm and enter into negotiations. The Committee shall notify the firm in writing. Negotiations shall begin based on the schedule in Section 11, or within five (5) calendar days of notification by the City & County, whichever is later. Ifnegotiationsare successful, the Committee shall recommend the favorable firm to the City & County Commissions. Thereafter, the City &. County may issue a notice of intent to enter into an agreement with the firm by certified mail. If the negotiations are unsuccessful, the committee shall begin negotiations with the second ranked firm. The committee reserves the right to negotiate whatever schedule is convenient to it and which is in the best interest of the City &. County. 8 .{",. 'C CALUME T S T CAlUt.4ET 51 I(') N . 0:: o 0:: cj ~ ~ LOGAN ST o I(') ~ ~ 0::: cJ SHERWOOD (I) ::l 0:: Z (J CARROlL a:: 4( ST GENTRY ST ST RANGE RO (I) W -J ;:) U 0:: W :r 0:: o GRANO AVE OiD~ PALUElTO o <::) ST C.R. 550 :0 ~ ..... ~ AJRPORT Q: !r tr.. c aD~ .... Or e: Q: ..... ~ <I( ~ \) UlJ OR ~ CJ~ GILBERT ~ ST Sf ~ ~@~LFo={] . CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS AOt.tINISTRATION ENGINEERING SCALE: 1... 800' -., SIiIC -- ... fIO -... H/A INDUSTRiAl AREA CENERAL vtONITY MAP - 07/07/91 -- N'A ... t (6 1 ., . I ......' ',:'. .~.: ~ "~ 0 '. _' ,,' . -; ( .., _' . \ " , . -, , : , . ~ OJ, ' , ~ " _ ~ . .~' . . "_ . '<, ,I . .. _ ~~: I ," . ,"~. .:-., "0'. EXHIBIT .A- to CITY OF CLEARWATER RFP # INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Liabilitv Insurance. The vendor shall furnish, pay for, and maintain during the life of the contract with the city the follo~ing liability coverages: a. Comprehensive General Liability insurance on an "occurrence" basis in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. b. Business Automobile Liability insurance in the amount of at least $500,000, providing Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. c. Worker's Compensation Insurance applicable to its employees, if any, for statutory coverage limits in compliance with Florida laws, including Employers' Liability which meets all state and federal laws. d. Professional Liability/Malpractice/Errors or Omdssions insurance, as appropriate for the type of business engaged in by the Vendor, shall be purchased and maintained by the Vendor with minimum limits of $500,000 per occurrence. 2. ~it~onal Insure~. The city is to be specifically included as an additional insured on all liability coverage described above, except the insurance coverage identified in paragraph 1 (d) . 3. Notice of Cancellation or Restriction. All policies of insurance must be endorsed to provide the city with thirty (30) day's notice of cancellation or restriction. 4. Certificates of Insurance/Certified Conies of Policies. The vendor shall provide the city with a certificate or certificates of insurance showing the existence of the coverages required by this RFP. The vendor will maintain these coverages with a current certificate or certificates of insurance throughout the term of the contract with the 1 'it 2 city. When specifically requested by city in writing, the vendor will provide city with certified copies of all policies of insurance as required above. New certificates and new certified copies of policies, if certified copies of policies have been requested, shall be provided city whenever any policy is renewed, revised, or obtained from other insurers. 5. The address where such certificates and certified polices shall be sent or delivered is as follows: City of Clearwater Attention: City Clerk P.o. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 o. The vendor shall defend, indemnify, save and hold the city harmless from any and all claims, suits, judgments and liability for death, personal injury, bodily injury, or property damage arising directly or indirectly from any performance under this RFP, or a subsequent purchase order or contract eDtered into by city and vendor, its employees, subcontractors, or assigns, including legal fees, court costs, or other legal eJrPenses. Vendor acknowledges that it is solely responsible for complying with the terms of this RFP or a purchase order or contract arising out of this REP. In addition, the vendor shall, at its expense, secure and provide to City, prior to beginning performance under this RFP, or a subsequent purchase order, or contract, all insurance coverages as required in this RFP. 7. Any party providing 8ftrvices or products to the ci~ will be expected to enter into a written agre~ut, contract, or purchase order with the city that iDcorporates, either in writing or by referance, all of the perttaent provisions relating to insurance and insurance re~ir~ent8 &S contained herein. A failure to do so may, at the sole option of tbe city, disqualify any vendor, bidder or proposer of services and/or products to the city. CITY OF CLEARWATER "Professional Consultant Services" RA liNG SHEET Date: Name of Firm: Criteria Maximum Score Comments Points Organization, Size Structure and 10 Technical Resources of Firm Knowledge and Experience with 15 Florida Municipalities Recent experience in dealing with economic development where 20 governmental clients were involved Innovative Features/Current Use 15 Completeness of Response to this 5 RFP Ability to Communicate Effectively 10 aualifications/Availability of Key 5 Personnel to be Assigned to the City Reports From References 5 Evaluation of Agreement/Contract 5 Principal consultant is located in 10 Tampa Bay region 100 9 <'; .'..',.,,,. :!<'" ECONOMIC CONSULTANTS Arthur Andersen & Co. 1 01 E. Kennedy Blvd., #2204 Tampa, FL 33602 Basile Baumann Prost Associates, Inc. Nichols Center, Suite 10 177 Defense Highway Annapolis, MD 21401 Bay Area Economics 8630 Fenton Street, #420 Silver Springs, MD 20910 (301) 589-6660 Fax: (301) 589-6661 Deloitte & Touche 201 E. Kennedy Blvd., #1200 Tampa. FL 33602-4990 (813) 213-8300 Fax: (813) 229-7698 Fluor Daniel Consulting P.O. Box 920280 Norcross, GA 30010-0280 (770) 840-0635 (770) 840-7965 Economic Research Associates 10990 Wilshire Blvd., #1600 Los Angeles, CA 90024 (31) 477-9585 Fax: (310) 478-1950 , - ',~' ' .' ~, " " .. ,t.:',., , j..1" .' , ' . j. Hammer Siler George Associates 8601 Georgia Ave., #1010 Silver Springs, MD 20910 (301) 565-5200 Fax: (301) 565-4184 Hunter Interests, Inc. 121 Main St. Annapolis, MD 21401 (410) 269-0033 Fax: (410) 280-9163 KMPG Peat Marwick 100 N. Tampa St., #2400 Tampa. FL 33602 (813) 223-1466 LDR International 9175 Guilford Rd. Columbia, MD 21046 (410) 192-4360 Fax: (301) 498-5070 Mumphrey Group, Inc. 5301 Elysian Fields Avenue New Orleans, LA 70122-4219 PricewaterhouseCoopers 101 E. Kennedy Blvd., #1500 Tampa, FL 33602 S R II nternationa i 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, CA 94025 SunRegion Associates, Inc. 5734 N. 10th Place Phoenix, J.2. 85014-2208 , ,.', ~ :. . ...,. . : ~ . ' . ~ '.'. ' , . /I ": ~'l ", .;. ';,;,-';" ...,.... t '".'~," ,,";i,:":,.:. t~,>;e>:~ Dames & Moore One North Dale Mabry Tampa, FL 33609 Wade-Trim Associates 4919 Memorial Highway, #200 Tampa, FL 33634 (888) 499-9624 Fax: (813) 884-5990 . ",. I . .- .(. '. , ' ,f . .." .... . '.. ;" I ,~ " I'.. " "" , I ;" , ,., , ,~ tI" " . . ~, .'. , ",. CITY OF CLEARWATER "Professional Consultant Services" RATING SHEET Date: Name of Firm: Criteria Maximum Score Comments Poi nts Organization, Size Structure and 10 Technical Resources of Firm Knowledge and Experience with 15 Florida Municipalities Recent experience in dealing with economic development where 20 governmental clients were involved Innovative FeatlJres/Current Use 15 Completeness of Response to this 5 RFP Ability to Communicate Effectively 10 Qualifications/Availability of Key 5 Personnel to be Assigned to the City Reports From References 5 Evaluation of AgreemenVContract 5 Principal consultant is located in 10 Tampa Bay region 100 9 .!~.~ . ' ", ........ . .. - .". ':. . ~ " I' . l' .' \' " ~ '. : . ," ." , ' , Item #1 7 ()!~o '" I fl, '.I' ,./ -~ -( .... .".. ": '..l~~" .~.., .... ..,. .<fl ..'...' "-f ~..";'-. f..",. ,,"', . \1 f\/\ 1- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # ('] 8'. \Q.99 Meeting Date: SUBJECT/RECOMMEN DAT!ON: Approve the recommendations of the Technical Review Committee for allocation of the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 City of Clearwater Social Services Grants Program funds in the amount of $65,000.00 and approve the proposed funding contract form. ~ and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: · Grant applications and instructions were mailed to area social services agencies that had expressed an interest in or that had participated in the program in previous years. . Requests are limited to a maximum c{ $1 0,000.00. Agencies can submit only one application per project. . Seventy-two (72) applications were mailed. Thirty-two (32) were received. . The applications contained requests of $250,574.00 collectively. . A Technical Review Committee met on June 21, 1999 to review applications and make recommendations. See summary report for committee members. . Criteria for recommendations are included in the summary report. . Additional Technical Review Committee recommendations are included in the summary report. . Funding for social services grants in the amount of $65,000.00 is included in the City Manager's recomme.nded budget for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. . Disbursements will be made to agencies after October 1, 1999. . Summary report and proposed funding contract are available for review in City Clerk Department. Reviewed by: legal ~e-- "'A..~ .....NA -- NA Info Srvc NA Originating Dept: Human Relations Costs Total 65,000 $ Budget Pu rchasi ng Risk Mgmt Public Works OeM! ACM Other NA ~ Current FY -0- Funding Source: CI OP XX Other NA Attachments ) Suhmitted by: City Manager l)l None A ro riation Code: 010-09231-582000-569-000 Rev. 2/98 Printed on recycled paper , '.", " ~. ..~ ,__ . ~~j .,. " .''',~,', ,.' ~ '.~ ,~,., , . f ,.," : .....1- ., '~. . :; '. ': 6, ' ..' '~', . . 17 AGREEMENT This Funds Agreement is made and entered into between the City of Clearwater, hereinafter referred to as the City, and * hereinafter referred to as the Agency. WHEREAS, it has been determined to be highly desirable and socially responsible to provide lie to those who would not otherwise have a means to fill this need; and WHEREAS, the City desires to help those in need by providing funding for the above services; and WHEREAS, the Agency provides such services and operates in the City; NOW, THERFORE, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I. TERM The term of this agreement shall be for a period of 12 months commencing on the 1 sl day of October, 1999 and continuing through the 30lh day of September, 2000 (the Termination Date) unless earlier terminated under the terms of this agreement. ARTICLE II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AGENCY 1. Services to be Provided: The Agency shall provide the above stated service in accordance with the proposal submitted by the Agency and approved by the City, which is incorporated herein by reference. 2. Area to be Served: Services rendered through this agreement shall be provided within the corporate limits of the City as it now exists and as its boundaries may be changed during he term of this agreement. ,3. Scheduled Reports of Agency Activities: The Agency shall furnish the City Human Relations Department, Grants Coordinator, with an annual report of activities conducted under the provisions of this agreement within sixty days of the end of the Agency's fiscal year. Each report is to identify the number of clients served, the costs of such service, and commentary on the viability, effectiveness, and trends affecting the program. 4. Use and Disposition of Funds Received: Funds received by the Agency from the City shall be used to pay for the above services as further described in the grant proposal submitted by the Agency to the City. Funds existing and not used for this purpose at the end of this agreement tenn shall be deemed excess to the intended purpose and shall be returned to the City. 5. Creation, Use, and Maintenance of Financial Records: ~-, ",_....:.~/......., ~ -~~ .... ~ :','~~'\""'",,< :,,-:-,'!':" ': -":...,'. ,,<( '/.~' ',:. ";:". t 1',,': " ....~. ,,;'.':.!'t".':~,"~,".':t"-, ......:..{'~.~'.-".~ a) Creation of Records: Agency shall create and maintain financial and accounting records, books, documents, policies, practices, procedures and any infonnation necessary to reflect fully the financial activities of the Agency. Such records shall be available and accessible at all times for inspection, review, or audit by authorized City representatives. b) Use of Records: Agency shall produce such reports and analyses that may be required by the City and other duly authorized agencies to document the proper and pnldent stewardship and use of the monies received through this agreement. c) Maintenance of Records: All records created hereby are to be retained and maintained for a period not less than five (5) years from the temlination of this agreement. 6. Non-discrimination: Notwithstanding any other provisions of this agreement during the term of this agreement, the Agency for itself, agents and representatives, as part of the consideration for this agreement, does covenant and agree that: a) No Exclusion from Use: No person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination in the operation of this program on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or disability. b) No Exclusion from Hire: In the management, operation, or provision of the program activities authorized and enabled by this agreement, no person shall be excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of or otherwise be subject to discrimination on the grounds of or otherwise be subjected to discrimination on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or disabi lity. c) Inclusion in Subcontracts: The Agency agrees to include the requirement to adhere to Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in all approved sub-contracts. d) Breach of Nondiscrimination Covenants: In the event of conclusive evidenced ofa breach of any of the above non-discrimination covenants, the City shall have the right to tetminate this agreement. 7. Liability and Indemnification: The Agency shall act as an independent contractor and agrees to assume all risks of providing the program activities and services herein agreed and all liability therefore, and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims ofloss, liability, and damages ofwhatever nature, to persons and property, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, death of any person and loss of the use of any properly, except claims arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or City's agents or employees. This includes, but is not limited to matters arising out of or claimed to have been caused by or in any manner related to the Agency's activities or those of any approved or unapproved invitee, contractor, subcontractor, or other person approved, authorized, or pcnni tted by the Agency in or about its premises whether or not based on negligence ARTICLE III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY 1. Grant of Funds: The City agrees to provide a total grant of$ * to fund the progrmn in accordance with this agreement and subject to City Commission budget approval. 2. Payments: The total amount requested will be paid by the City to the Agency within 30 days after execution of this agreement by the City and the Agency but no earlier than October 1 of the budget year for which the funds are authorized. ARTICLE IV. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties on the subject hereof and may not be changed, modified, or discharged except by written Amendment duly executed by both parties. No representations or warranties by either party shall be binding unless expressed herein or in a duly executed Amendment hereof. ARTICLE V. TERMINATION 1. For Cause: Failure to adhere to any of the provisions of this agreement as detennined by the City shall constitute cause for termination. This agreement may by temlinated with 5 days notice without any further obligation by City. 2. Disposition of Fund Monies: In the event of termination for any reason, monies made available to the Agency but not expended in accordance with this agreement shall be returned to the City. ARTICLE VI. NOTICE Any notice required or permitted to be given by the provisions of this agreement shall be conclusively deemed to have been received by a party hereto on the date it is hand-delivered to such party at the address indicated below (or at such other address as such party shall specify to the other party in writing), or if sent by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), on the fifth (5th) business day after the day on which such notice is mailed and properly addressed. 1. If to City, addressed to Grants Coordinator, Human Relations Department, P.O Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 2. If to Agency, addressed to ARTICLE VII. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this agreement shall be as of the first day of October, 1999. .IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this '" '. . .... ..' . ~ l . ,.';' . ";':. ~ " ..... ' . ,,' .' .'" ~. , . . day of , 1999. City of Clearwater, Florida Countersigned: Attest: Brian J. Aungst, Mayor-Commissioner Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Approved as to form: By: President John Carassas. Assistant City Attorney Attest: Witnesses as to Agency: CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA By: Michael Roberto, City Manager .. 4 ". "'" ...-v .",..- -\. ..t-,.....,... 't......... ...,t t j9 .., .... ,f ",,&." 1_ "'t,...... _, ~... .... .", .,/.. .. ~., .1, f. ',_ '.. \"....l~'.. .~. ..., . ,t"" ."lI'",\'j". ',-, .. ....... .~. :.# ,.. ....... ......... I' ....,".~ .;",......4 '.'" .'. i._ ......." \. .1.....\' .....~.:.~,. .,.': .", ....... #' "." '"'.l Ill"'. ~ ~ C ~ Co4r- VJ~ E-O ~~ c~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~v.1 V'J= ~= <= _N UCi:i 0'" fI)~ === ~< ~~ <:>- ~--J ==< <U ~OO ~- U~ "'" o ~ - U LJ '. .:' : ' . , . . " . ~', . \ . , G ~ ~ II II ~.~ .......6 38 >- ~ - II <OS ,~ ~ ~ ii:~ iii (J ] ~ ~ ~ <::) E: d ~ c i;,,) ~ c ~ Q ~ tI. C Z ~ ~ r.l o.l = ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ C2 u o z ~ o oJ oJ ~ ~ :z:: !- '" u 't: ~ ";; U'l c;; 't: u I:lIl ~ s:: ~ Euu ~ Co) U 0'-'''''' U c: e >~Co ,- Co "iQU::1 :J -5 . .~ ~ t: filS::~S -g 'E"Q :: .a"'O~0 0Il~C5 c:: crs >..- :c -= 02 ~ ~ ... ::S'- OIl! E lii :::E-el:lll e 0 a '" Co) III U "Q ... .~ U 8 c: ~ t;; ~-", ... 5 e ~::2a '" "Q C .a '- o ~ U ~ ?J ri.i z o - ~ @ ~ ~ ~ o u ~ C) z - ~ z ;:J "" ~ z :;a < ~ z - ~ ..:l == ~ o > :: z ;:J ~ 4( < ;: ~ ~ ;: U e" Z - ~ o ..:l ..:l o '- ~ == ~ e ~ o. .. P- o ~ o oS ,S ... c '" .~ II> "a. ~g. 'E>- u.D ",ell .... C 0:0 r:: C .2.E BO ;.::~ g.~ QG U .... o ?;- U t1 -5 o .... o - Co 'u u u ~ .. ~ ~ o c '!:j ::l ] 's 8"Q 's e ~; If 8'S1ici5_ ,- c:: - ] ~ ~ii: u ~ Cll<osr:9o.....s~ "fl.uo~ou&i ~.aEu~~~= =:=~::l~~o~ :;o-=~"C:;:"" ~ ..... ,!! ~ .!. II 5,~ O v .- c ... >.... :; 0 Q.., Ol 'S :.I ~ ~6~bii:~:.u ~ E 0 E C III ,~ z (-ot::co~6-;~ (-0 <0 U t;:; 5'J:; .~ t.:) ~8~~~~l< :;~g~fi<5~ Uo '15 ~] ~] e ~ G: ..- u .., III ~ ~ :> .5...p-co- ~"'-OUco ~ 0 0 Q'~ > ~ _~u~",~.s;.J >5i~u8~~0' ~ 'S = U '-l; Q.., .- ~ c:: '- U..c: .. 3 c.:: E .5.... c.2 e r.. ..;:l'OQ..,'QI'J)... '>J ~<vi..-;c::EZ_ U eo ,- tJ 0 E >.g:EuQ z~.g~I'J)_~~~ =o~..~O;og,- U 0:.- ~ U 8 ::.:: ,.J ~ ...; ~ t: Q .~ ~ < f-c ~ ~ c.2 ~ >.~!-O ::l .'-"C >. 0 g ~~fi2oS!-o co Q<e >. ..!. 0 -5 U <0 ~ U ; 'C ~ ~ CI) c;, , . .,J" " o = c:i = o iii Iol:) l.I'l ',' .. ... ....'~ .~.: '. . :',! . ....',-' J ~ ~ ,.J ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ !-o ~ ... U ~ ~ , ..' ,:- ..... . " :. . ':...".. " .... ,... ., '. .'. . . , .. ,.:..' .:...~' . - ,. ,......... . '--, . . It'" . . " ~"',. . , .'. . ' . ... . t.... .'... '" , l....~ . . '\-. .,... off '. "\',Ii'o 't-'. . t'..., r ;.. ...' ,." ....1 <.. ~ . ........6 11oo H" ~. '\l~.. "... . .." ..,' . ,I' . t> .;. f.. ,,'~ ''''~1'' .lI,' ",....'" " '~','" ..t ... "fl. I..... .. ..',.... "','" t \.1 ,... :.... ;...~. i. '.. ~....... . 'I .. ;.. ,4 .' "'4'i.. ..t( t, '\).' .... I. ~ ...... .~. \ ',; ,'.'..4' Ill."', }f'..,.,. . ,":'. .." ........ .' .. ~..-. 1'...( ,.,... ~ U = Eo- ,..J -< Z o - E--o - Q Q g 00 s:: :0 & '- o ~ .!! u -5 M g .5 '0 :; o ~ In ~ g C> o C> - IA ..... o U > .!:! e.o c :0 c a '3 o - eo .... a 8 q Irl "" IA ..... o ~ o e '" 2 .2 - :a "0 '" GJ oS .5 "0 G) "0 .E. /:lO .8 .5 _"0 .~.E e .... ~a ,~ "0 -B~ - c::: .ss ~E c 0 u u E ~ E '" 0.2 ~u ~t:= ::: u 's oS E"fi 8:.2 ~ ~ u E ,- ~ ~ & ~ e -;~ u>, ,- u ..2 c u ~ ~ ~ vol: ~ ~ ..... .'. v ~ t: ~ ~ ~ co e e :3 (/) "B .c ~ ~ co u .c ... I:: o >. u I:: U c:.o co .c u co u ... .E I Z o ~ o Z tzJ ~ ~ o U tzJ CJ::: o ! ~ ~ ~ ;...J ~ '" ~ ~ o .t:: '" .:!! ell c::: :a I:: .z c;j I:: .g :.0 "0 '" "0 G) '" o ~ e 0. '" ~ u c:: - c:: .2 ~ 3 r2 8 l o '~ E ~ .c =0 :3 ~ ] II> '2 's "1:1 co ..8 g ... o g ... ..! 's 'in .... : 'I\"~ '. .) ~ . 'in e g.~ '" e ~a.. ;:~ ~ ~ .EC '" III C ~ ::J .- ~ ~ c u t<Jen .Eo;; t<J,- .t::g .:!! en :0 .!!! 5-5 "'.... u 0 ~t: t<J cC ~ t:l. t<J cC u.... _0 uc ..... I o e .~~ Uo u ... .,st:l. U ~~ ",0.. "Ou 5 : e u e.o o.!!! u.c: u.... .... .... ul! r= .;; u C .t::o .... .- ~c; - '" -I:: eo u S e .:;; E :00 "Ou <~ . ,"" . . . . '. .. ~ . . , r..'..... ..... ~ , "" .'" . . .. ... ..'V ..\.~. . .... '... ..... ""~'. ....,.... "'''II '.' .. '... .. .....'~. ,'<.' ,'\ ...' ..f \_ .,... ~ .' oJ. ,. "\ J. "''''..",.,. t ........ .' , . J' , .....'. .. . . . \. J ..... : " 1'... 'j.... ".-.,.,. I . ~ ... '. ".' \ J', ." .'t. . ". .. '.. :.. ....~ ,t ,. '" ,*,'41\' .. .i. ,.,.. .... ..' ,,. ...... . .. " , ........ Z O<ll Cii~ ~lIl ~~ 00 UU Cz ~O Q- Z~ ~~ tWlIJ ~~ ~~ tW8 ~~ < z 0 - Q~ ZQ G:~ u~ ~~ f-o U ~ I'-)Q Q~ ZE- ~(I) '--~ g~ ~~ (I) QQ Z~ ~E- ~~ ~ ~o . ' , , " , ,', , '. .~ ., ~~ . c:l}Z O;:J ~~ OE-< ~~ c:l}e,:, o~' ~o ;:JZ ~o ~5 0- 0::: ~E-o c..::> > u z ~ '" < \I') o "'" '" ~ .". - o ...-i ~ V"l o ..". ~ ..". - <0. <"'l lI"I o 0\ .n .,., o 0\ N .,., o 0\ ..0 '~ .". - o .n M N "1. - .". - o ..0 <0 <0 8 0 <0 <0 0 0 <0 0 <0 0 0 0 ci 0 o. 0 - - - lI"I - ~ ,"'0 E . "g ~ of: - ~." ~ ~ ~ @ ..c: E c c;f .~ 0 U.- V-EO c~Cl.g "'0 () 0 . , ~, g .~ u ~ . ~ ~ v ~ ::l '~ r '" ~.:.,,-; Z'-lVO-cu rn ~ ~ ~ -t ~ 1.~ c.J. . ~ .S :. '" "iil :9 ~' v t) 0 0 U ..."t)::lt;:; 0'- c '" "'~>'ilJ- Z 0 ~ 5 ~ .:: eo ~ r_" r, ~ ~ ell 5 ,s .g ~'W,",",,_cE"'C':l ~ ~ 2 .~ ~ g'~ ~ ~~...t.:..OCJo..... o I Co. C @ C .- - CJ \oj.c . 'C u ~::: <.;:; 'C: 0 CJ -<' 0 "'::l C .... E ~ ::l ...:<j8 M lI"I M 0\ t-- t-- M 0\ .- o .,., r' V) >. -;:: ~ ~ co", :g ..e ~ ~ ~ .....'~ -a E CI) u "0 iA ~ '-~ :6 to.. en ..c :> OJ) "0 V . V OOIl)~ ...c.9 ...c....~ E c :-: U.o c.9 .~ 0 c.9 0 ... v OJ) . O~lI)c lI"I ..co.cl:;<Il l:. ::s .- >>~. v... <.;:. E ._ 0 :s! .... ~ ~ U "0 :: ..:. :0':; OJ) U [:'';;: .- 1-<00 C... ,..... ~ ,- ;;> c ~ v- ..c "0 '0.... U o~'"O II) v'- r::; 11)'- u '0 ij l':! ~ <.;:. 'o'U; :g ~ .:: ~ () ::; "0 ..c U .coO 0. u ~:::.- . COin.... c;j () 0 ::s ... .- .= ~ c...c . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.- ~.- ~ ~.- ~ ~ ::So ~ ~ C ~E ~ v 0 ::s ~.... tj ~ ~o C Ul':!.o l<l~E~..,..c'- l':I .:: E '0 C () c;j l':! ul':!E E ::s c'::: 0 ~ ~ o,g:s! ~ ~ () ~ :s! 0 ~'fa ~ c r; .: "0 c:.a:-::: >>~o \'l:.E -5 u ~ v ..c v c o ~.- u..c: c B u '..c- .9 c -7 "0 8.9 <.;:. ..c I:ll)~ <.J ::l .... - ... :> '" 01)<0.:. I!! >,.... ~ c u V 0 l':I 0 U ;;> c.- 0 ~ l':! l':! a ~ .- 'r;; Vl U u"O e II) v III I .:g po. g u 0.0::2 0 "0 v.- uNO"E II) ~ "0 "0 .S: ~ .0 oS ~:-::: -;;; ~ .~:f: E ;g h ~ U - 11)....- ...-..c":; 0:" () 0- - l':I-o .- OJ) 0 - () "I... I.. .c... v -5 EU 5 c<.,;::. ~ ~ -0 "Oa"O ~ gf r: ,0 E -g a .... .- .- cD U 'C -::s 0 ~o'O'O o...N 1Il~C1j:Sco:l~;..vi '0 ():-::: c U 1Il'- - ::s "0 v IlJ V 0 ~ U ._ C.c:: 2 ;. U -0 l':! ._ ..c .c "0 ;. c:.=: ;. ,- (.) 0:.. "U; ... 1lJ;. -.c v v 0. o ~....-o ~ '-.o~.o 0'0 0... ve c.. ct ,g ~ a 0:: ~ Bl ~ .9 ct a ~.~ U: 0 5l a.i >.l<l ....u '2 '0 ::s_ E'- E.c:: oU U.g . 'C u No.."::: "E to..o . - U l':I V C .S a- "Eu~ 8"0= u:-:::~ . ..c '_ MUo... U -5 ...... o 8 " 1Il'- U -o[:C 50-.. 'C en ~ tJ..';c U IlJ ..tou V "0 ~ o ::s 9c.~ ~.- IlJ 5 3 ~ eE-5~ OE<;c o U U "';u:cu . . l' .' ...... .. ~. ',4:.., .. .-, ......,..".'.,.......,...1........'.'..4......' .~. ..~.....:...:.. ,.., ....../., ".....'.,.. ,. .".....',...~.................~...,......:.....',.,.......;. ......I".~I........'.~.,...(.........,.........1..'\'.~...,'~.4.A...,..,.....;............,...;0.....& ,I'" z 9~ ~~ ~~ 00 UU r.,:,z 250 QE: Z< ;JQ ~Z ~~ E-:E < :Eo ~o ~U'" ~~~ <:> CO ~ vi M V'\ o M 0\ M VI o 0'1 r-: - ~ z o - Eo- Q< ZQ ::>Z '-~ u:E ~~ E-O u:! ~~ V'\ o 0\ .a " "'t I~ "'t 0\ '<T - I'- N - on "'t~ - 0 ~ M N \0. .' C'-lQ Q"-J ZEo- ;Jen ~~ Q~8 Q~e ~~~ o o o o - 8 on r: \0 \0 I'- .n o '" o r: en QQ Z~ ;JEo- ~~~ ~r.,:,~ o ~ 00 00 \0 ..f I'- I'- M 0' 00 00 \0 ..f t::. ta ~ 'l.l .S 'l.l 0 'l.l . E 1.2 . '0 C;; ~ E-~~'l.lM~ e~~ '0 Ol) O~:s!c::EO ~ ~ 1:. ~ en.S - c: u Vi .- s:; ~ t.) c: . ~ -- ~ Q ~ IU ~ I: t:: .c.c: vi' In "@ >- 0 0.... 5 _ ~ ~ ~ .- 'l.l U (,) U 'l.l C/) ~._ 0 0 0 .... en Z ~ U III ~ Q., '0 (,) U.~ -cii'O C;; '0 ....: 0 .... o ::J .- c:: .:: 0 >< 0._ 'S: > U _ ~ 00 V> Q. 0 ""' ~ J:;;::s - U ~ E ~ t .- '3 0 I: 4) to=. ~ 0 '0 0 '0 .0 0 U Vl:::: "0 c.. 'S: 9 .c 0 OE-'l.ltagllS -~~c:Vl~B ~@~~O~aU ~ ~ .32 '~ .- '0 CJ) ctl ~ 0 c; u iil ... 0 en 'l.l.... I) ~.- 'l.l (,) .- .c co.;; ~ '0' .- _ ~ _~~_ ~t,)UUU_~ _ O'I~en ....~ _ _0 .g ~ 0 I: ~ 0 0 .- .c ~....O ~ CIS'Vi . ...~ CJ) U 0 <i) '0 'l.l U OOto=..... III en en r.,:, \;: I-< VI E ~ "0 _ d' I: oS ~ .5 .c 0 9 CIS ,~ o r~ .,; '0 ..e:a ::: '0 .- c: 0 (\S '0"': ~ I: U 0 1Il - U ~ - ... c:: >- ;> t:: ;> ~ .- - t:: 4) 1n:O C;;'- 4).~ 5 Q:: 0 :g ~ 8 :::: 'u (\S.g.~ 'C fi (oj '5 fi Q. E ~ .~ g 00 ::J Z lIS"@.- 13 I: C ~.:: :5 E 5 a3 .~ ::s _ ~ ~ ~ ii ""' 0 ~ E 1: :.2 ';;.::! E 0 I: ~ .a - .0;:: &bo ~ .... V) c:= E ~ - .. ., .~" U C':l ~ - - u U .3 \'0 . 4) ~ E- : - ~.... I: on 0 Vl -:S 0 .- .... >- ~ ~ '0 >. .... ~~'O_~~ug (\S>-'OE-;>.c~-V) (4) .... - _ .. .....- ~ .... (,).0;:: !;-: - Q) t) c: .c N :.a ~ ~!!l en -E 0 u U.::: '0 ~ .0 ~ .... := /';lI) 0 - r.,:, - (,).- I=;:i 'Vi tn .- .c .... - .J:l _ ~ CIS 0 @ Oil 0 O.JI-<~ue .~gE;>-"'fio::s4) UOO...ii'O ..... ~ c.E ~ E..... .... _ - .- ~ ~ .... la <i) 0 ~ ~ CIS E I: ~ c: ~ .... u ~ <: - i: I: ~ 4) ~ - 1:.-.... U..l (\S -.... ~~ 0 ~ ~ OJ)tn'~.g.g p..>-,5 ~ 0 s.g ~- vi (,)t,)~ ~4)C:: -\'O.c~I-Uen~4)"O>,d) '::-' .- ~ - d) - 4) u _ "f' (oj ,- - ~ to=. .- "i: .;:: ~ on 'l.l U N ~ ::s - 0 > CIS ~ > u.- 1-0 >- U '0 4) 4).-'", '0 00 CIS '0 c;::: ~ d) ~ '0 0 "0 - ~~g~G~~~~U..l~~~~~8~~~~ o o o o ...... .-. l""- e ..0 ,5 4) ~o o :>, .!!l.c:-5! c: ~ V) t)......g ~ 0 <Il Q,""'" 1= d) V) iil E ~ 1-0 0~0Il U (ij e ,5:..J Co ~.....::: o d) U ~~3 '-~- o ~ .... vi ~ ClJ ~,9 -Bu::;.ii ::::u"8B ..t::-.oo uo...c..r:: .9 C/l Ci ~ 4) c;J..o 'l.l ~ ~ ~ ~ CJ .!! . Q) U ~oc:9 ..t:: ~ ClJ:c u CJ -S u >- U Z ~ t,;l < 4) l:a -u ~ >- o _ U '2 .... ::s :; E o E .0 \ou _vi' ~.~ o C Uu :::(/') co; ~ -;; ::J) . u 0 c'...J.5 >- gg - 0 cnU ~ ~ 4) - ::Co I: 000:: vi >-4) - U .... ,- o C ..04) ~cn .- .... U 0 Z '2 cJ , 4) I: 01 (/') _ "1:l - U ..r:: c u- 1Il>,:J :>,.... ~.-t:>.':J _OJ -;:; '2 -: ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ c:3::::.... ::l~ .- ... U OIl;'" 1-0 U c:... 0 I: !;-: <Il ~. 0 .. 0. ~ .....-... ~ oo.oS~E.-:la -OUU.l<(o..-U f . , . .... ~ .' .... .I'.. ,":,,' .'.' ,.' ~"." ,.'r. I.)' '\'\~,. ": ~.'.~' ": i",'; \.It'.~. ,~; '-"':"_':~":_ ~_1 ... f.', r......,~..... .". .......~.'\.,f'.........f "',.~. .,'..' ,.........,~...,f."'~..' z ~8 ~~ 00 UU Cz ~O Q.... z~ ~Q ~Z ~~ ~8 !:3~~ <Cl:..o 'i' '" C""\ oq <<:i z o .... Q~ ZQ ;:JZ '-~ U:a! t(~ 1-00 u:! ~~ oq C""\ r-- M Cl)Q Q~ ZI-o :::JCI) II.~ = ~;:J g Q 0 ~~~ 8 N v:) CI) QQ Z~ ::Jf-o ;~~ r:(.?~ c.. >. "il U ..c: ..c:S::-a . t;; UOEs:: Q en Ul"O C,) :.2 ell ~Q~~.': ~U>UU CI) '"7 - . C,) '"" o :5 ';; a C"c;j .~ ~ ; ~ II. 5'':.8 & ; 5 o f-o'- 5 c.. '"" ~ U - ;1 ~ Z~ ~ ~ -~~ ] ~ lIl'~ ~5 _ _ ~ ..U__ E ~ - s:: C,) Q) CIl e" ~.~ c U "'ij F= ~ o 0._ ~ ~ E ~ 0 c.. ~ '- ~ 1Il._ C '0 'C Cll o 4.l'5.<;:: ~ a ..c: ~ (\I ~ Co () c.-... >._ ::J Z oa": ~'(;l ~ 0 ~ OIl f: ~~ sa.5 ~5 ~ E 0 ~ ~.5 ~ f-o-:3 4.l ....i1Ugj... -<.Q 0 gJ:! Ci 9J~O~ N U-..c:.D ~ 0 u.t: <IJ e,,- . c.. ellt::'" eo.... U o == !! 5 s ~ -a :.~ 5 5 Cl::f-o"il eo ~ Oil ; u:.:: ~ c.. ~ ::J ~ .5 .;; a -: ~ = E ~ ."'0 Oil u 0 ... Cll U ... ;i!.5 c;::O 1:: .c CI) c..'; O-::S 0 ceo>.... c.. u..5 8 <!2 8 U3 So. ~ ~ ". .... .J 'F' ........._~ ,. .' ...... ...... ...'_...............__.~ ...... ,.', .. t, ... oJ. t. .'.. 'h . ,to,. .,.'1t . ..~ ....... . -,' ~ If,,"". .,. << .\.': a"'~',. ,....~. .....a ~. 'J ..:... .'''''f~'''''.(' .t. .. t,_ ...... .' ,."'..~....' "'.'.".,.. ,,':.~'''.<.J .'<1;0. ....'-.. #"'l '" o "<t 00 ~ "<t ..... VI r-: ". : ....- o o o <0 r-- r-- ~ oi .~ u ~ gj (:: ~ ~ ~ "tl Cll -a ~ eo 00 o c ,5 rr> ~ ,_ Cll ~ tj..!!"tl '> a 5 oct:'" ... Cll .t: o <IJ U I,) .:; ~ ~ s:: E ~ 'tn 0 _...... aii) e c..s:.E ~ ~ g ':;; N-::S tio~~ .:;....otB o 0...11'\ ~ ,,:13ca fat9~=E ooo.c"O c U <n _ 'in c 0 e :2 ..!! <n 0 ~ ,g ..5 :is ....>~... " ,,-.... .. . ~ " >- u z ~ e" -< ~ s:: -. ~ ::l o <"i g ..... -- I I <IJ , <n . c.-. 5>.gIA 5>-.go :~ '2 ~] ~:~ '2 :- ~ -:2u.... -:2o~ ~ e,~ 0 ~ E ,~ :r: ,g1:~o ,gt:,g~ ~u~oO:!U~r-~ . . ,.', ,t~~...:./" .' ~-. ..,..." '-'. 'I-~"""".: ,. '.. ,J.:., .:,.::".... .....' ~ '., -"'.' "')""';':Il';~~""'" '. '='. .... .;~~ .. ' , :.1,--.;. it....,' '.. . ~"... I' t... " '~'~'.'I~ ,,"',1 ,'. ~:.', .~ .a ..... .....~I,..,.. ......... """'..~~,' ..... .',..._........'/k'-. .,..~.'... H ..... I. .'" ,,'~t ..'I....I....t_~. .t,......'~.. tf ,......:....:...,'....". .~.....'.,..'.,....,'.."'.(...... ....:..........'\"....."'........ .,.t.. ."f;",'~.".. Ill'''''''.'.''' z g~ l:jZ _'-I ~~ ~~ 00 UU Cz ~O ~~ IIoQ ~z I-~ <(~ ~~ ~O I-U ,.J~ <( Z o .... Q~ ZQ ;::;Z ~t&J U~ gc:~ 1-0 U ~ CI'lQ Q~ Z!;; ~t.J g~ ~~ en QQ S~ ~Z ~~ t:~ >- U Z W;J U < lI'l o "<t ~ VI o "<t ..; C'l ,., ~. V'\ Cl Cl ~ on Cl ~ ~. :.0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 lI'l <::> ci - - C'f 0; --- . :.~: ).'.{~ ;. : . '- o ~Vico ;:jG.J"O o ;:: 'C ~..2 >,COtJ.._ o U-.- ~'5 g g . E 5 6 ~<uu ... ~ ~.5 0 "'~V') E f:i _ "" vi !'Io~ g~u So~o u>>~ o 3,- u '" c 5."':a .aCloo ... ~ ~ .l!l .. Clo'::; E ~ <II C .~ u 13 . E"8 ~ .~ '" ..c: :.a. g ..c: .- ~ g Clo'- .u ". ~.~ ~ '" '" .; C;>\..t:...u-.. ccu~uc;o~ uo"'....-o;jO ~~.9~u-o"l3a ~".l!lU-o~VlU ~..c '" g ~ So~ la ct:oo"'c~u .- 0 u ... )! U -0 .5 Z E ..... 0.. E ~:: g 0 <II .~' 0 ._ ..c "0 -5 to:E ,g ~ .~ ~ UCe<ll"'o"'l;2~ .... .- p.... "0 Tn c..:;. B .!!! III C 'Vi '" rl' ~ g 'So"8 ~ ~ ~ :.a. ~ V) E..c u g (/.) Q. '': '" u 0"0 "'- 5l VI ~~.oc~~-ui .- u..c '" .- .- 8 c ~ "0 .::> ~ , , ..c ~ Q:: -g ~ '6j ~ ~ ~ g u a .-..... . 'Iii 0 u c t c - - u ..: ,c ... u t-~g. \0 ... ~ -~~ VI :I .0 .00 . c ~ ~ g '2 g .~ ;: ~ GE .- ... u Q., 8.c.!!! ,....:p.~]e -0(;(/)0.. - <::> V') r-: >. ~ u u c >. :G~ ..... u o c u .9 ~ c E 0 ~ .::; ",.5 ~'1; '- '" ~:.a '" ... 0..9 i~ o 0 ~~ u..c: c u ~ 3 'Vi p.. ~ ~ ri '" '- .- ] 'E 'E u:.~.r: I '" . ::l U > .S! o..s b .:?!J'2 vr C u E ~ ~ ex: E 'S "00 cci8bo -",,(/)t.I. ~ ~ ,,5 ~ fa _ u ... u.:.: 0 '" ~ - 15~ ..r:: E Ul ... 0.5 ..8..r:: 01) ..r:: ~.5 . :!l [;j t:: u _ ~ eo.... "'.~ ~ .5 ~ 'Ul . VI "O.!!..!!! ~u'-=~ .~ ~ E '5 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ :;.= E _._ u_ UU)-5~ .~ .B"O g "0 u c'';:: u"O '" .., .~.~ ~ g ;gou~ ]C"'eJ u ;j C1 C ... 0 0.... 0. U U ... E <II"OoU o c'" u S'1ii g .r .'.' . '" u u '0 ~ t: j .. t' . A':~ ~ = g g e ~ :.~';~:.f,~<{ ~', ,~', -;; a ~ u CI] Z . . " .' u...... u o ::;J , .' ~ 'u .g .5 c.. ~ ~ ~;:':';i' , U -5 ~ E o po.. " ~ uuo~ Cl::: :z '. '. (.. ~ ~ > g;..... e-.< -;':i' CD~ E:2 5;"g ~ = '~y '. '_~' IS E g"O '" ~ C,;) ::':'i":~~~i ;s <::> .s E a g ~ ~ . ...., "', ~ G.J ... o ;. ~ ....;.:..: ....~ o...c c ~ . ""~'(, ~ ~~ _ ..... u c:: ::;J"'" '~",'.'. r..... ' G.J 0. E u c.. 0 i:;' .;.;. :..... ..s:: - 0. U ~ -' ",~. ~ -5 ~ '5 0 po.. ':i'.'.;."i ..w ~ ~ 9 if u <..., ~"-,~ ..c N .,',';;:'! . = -. '" E @ -;; ~ ::3 ";~':.~::';<u 1. ~ >..;:: 50'- vi ~ E= ,~. "S .s ~ ,g ~ e .~ -g c.. ::;J .- 's ""'j <::> .9:: ~ 3 ~ ~, _ ~ ..... ""u C; ~ 0 .., ~ ., fill!) ~ -5 .;:: .5 .0 .., "'" ... t..'- C - ..c ~<U Q ~ t:b~6~ <~~~~i;8.~~ c: u E U 0 ~ ~ ;j ... 5l~ u ... ex: u .c ~(j . . ....-. 0( p.~.....' . .' - ,,'. ,..:....": ......: , . . ......, , I'" . '. I'. . ,,'* '., ~..., ",~. " . . ~ .\"."" . ',f _ . .\. . , ". fl' ....~., ..: . ~ .. '. , .... " " ......, .... . .,...... ,'~,.....t.-.. - _" '. . .... .. ....'J..., . ." _" ... .J \. ,.........'. __. ,f. ...... ."r *.., _~.. f . _.'.. '....1...' . .I,': ..... ....,. ".,... -. ..,.,-.,.,.. ,.. "'1', .~.O( .... .. t,. .'." ".",. q'--" ...-1_ >,.r ..'''11; ..,.... ,.';,' <#' ..i"'".......,..,. Z Ooo ~~ :t:t :t:t 00 uu t.:)z ~O =- z~ SQ ~Z ~~ <~ ~~ ~O ~U ..J~ < z o - Q~ ZO ;:;)Z '-~ (.)~ ~~ ~O U ~ ;-:.~;:, CI.lQ Q~ Z~ :::>oo '-~ g~ ,~ oo QQ z~ ;:;)~ ~~ ,c QOO ~Q , cnZ O;J ~ l:l.o~ ~ o ~ r,;..'l ~Z ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ :::>Z ~ l:l.oO ~[:ooO ~~f:9U~~ 0- U r.,... ~~ Z ~ l:l.o;J~~~ (JOO <Z~ >- U Z ~ t.:) < o o o o - o o o vi o o ora r--.'" - 00 M \IS ora N N ..,; 00 00 '<t N o ora r--~ - ,I.. ~ ; ., >. o o o vi ... ... ~ ~ S c:: ..E::I- V C ~'<=3 c:: 0"0 :.c ..cc:: Cl.l = ..c ~ ~ OU en::l V'- ... > ... 0... OJ) 0 ~ E e ~ ~'S ..E 1: .2 .5 U t:: 0 ~,.g.- en 0... ~~~..c ]~...- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ::s t c:.t c ~ 0 ~ OJ .u ~ Cl.lc::en~ ].2 Cl.l~Cl.l 1a~ c::~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ] 5 [;g .s ~ . "000 ~ vi "E 0 0 1: ... .- 5 0 ~ ::I a 1= ::. ~ "5 o ..c - OJ) ~ 1= '€ 00 a. ~ en ~ ~ ... o OJ) CI:l '- .- ~ w Cl.l ;:;-, Cl.l (OJ U ::I ~ c:: :;:: 0 '?- vi l5 C'- 0- u Of) 0.. ~e~~ 1= ...~<.;:; Cl.l~~"'e... ..c - 0 ,(ij;; ::10 ~ bO ~ ~ - 0 0...2 .~ ... 0 U - c:: ~ c:: ....::1 h' oed ~CI:l :::enc...c>.en ~ en en vi ... 0 c:: a ~ ...c 4-. .- :l:::: ~ = E 5 c: ~ ,....l ed ._ c:: g ~ 0 1= 0 g "0 ~ ~" N .S! VI..c >< tE.- 0 Cl.l (ij CI) E v, _' -... 1a Cl.l U 0 c:;j <.;:; <II Cl.l c:: c:: ~ o.-=: CI:l ~ E ~ a.~ t:: en..c~ = .- E.!2 ~ ... U ti v, Cl.l - Cl.l ~... 0 ... Cl.l ~ tIl'" 'iij .,g .!::: go 1;j ~ .:! l:.;:; S U 5 ...t::en~ ~_Cl.l 5o~~>0..::IC::C::0f)> ~o~~ ...~5~ UCl.lcu U ~ E c ~,D vi ~ '" >. l:: ~"VI'C U._ "- co.. ::I~"O~~"OCl.l="'_Cl.l~>.t::o.. ~ ::I 0 E c:J.- ~ en ._ U CI:l - CI:l:= ~:::: 0 U ~ ~ ..c:: E c: ~ 5 ~ ~'E ::I~ 5 'u .~- ~ E 2: ~ ~ c:: ,':0 0 ::I ...:::: Qj ... Cl.l :.:: 0 ed :l .c 'oJ ed _ U '" 0.. ~ "0 0.. '" U en ..... .:: Lt. en <':l ... .2 C cctic: o en ::I .;:; ~ 0 :=Cl.lU ~ E :q Uo- :tv 0] .5 N_o.. . ... c ~ <2 'S .::: ",.s ::I ~ c::- E g.S! ~ E .;:; U :t O~~e~ U U ~.- .:; c Cl = . , ~::I . Cl.l U M~~~:::E.5 u oS 2:>cti .;: OJ a l: Lt. 5 l"i ~ N~ ... ~ .2~c: Cl.l .c: CI:l ~ ~.~ U,D"O 2:>c:~ ti ~ ..... c..~~ o u := 5.>~ o 0 ~ ... '" ? '" c.. Cl.l ~:.c~ '- en C ~a::l a .- 0 ::I"gU bOC';l_ '" ::S'- Vi tl.O 13 ...: '- ...... ... ~ ~.guE CI:l c: ~ "O::s~... c:: .- >< ~ ~ .:! 0 "'....-0.0 Cl.l C';l ::I c:J t<i~-.Ol u....~C';l ::s.- >< Vi "0 .,g ._ ~ UJ_en.... . ,'.' 1a c:: :a..... 0 .S! '8 ti a 0 c:: (:3 oE::sc:::S "0 ..cCl.lt:)o(3 g (; U Q,)';:: o Cl.l .c .......c:.::: :q r. CIl.r= ::.: L... u- - <':l :I).-r- o'U ~ ::: 'u ~ .n ~.5 N>ZLt.N"<o.. . .. ~ ".~." .;'. ,t' . .... I ", .~-:..." "'.. . " : ", '. '. .. , ' . .. :.'. ~ ,'~ J ...' " .. . . . " , . ".' ~ ... ...~~ ..... ' :'''. ,R . .......,.\...........' ..~'.............. ....... ......l.~.' .t. .......J.. ......... .,..'.........,...,...:.,..,I....._.c....f......,....l........r....... ...."'.I,~... .,.'I'..."'.....~;........,.,",.,J,,....,... ,.,......:...,.....,.#.........l.r- Z O(/) -~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 00 UU ~Z ~o Q- Z~ :::lQ ~Z ~~ f-o:; <:; ~o ~U ~~ Z 0 . - Q~ ZQ :::lZ ~~ U:; 0::; f-oO U ~ Cl)Q Q~ Z~ ::J(/) '-~ Q~8 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 N f::~~ r- q 0 -- 00 0 0\ M ..0 CI) QQ Z~ ::;)~ '-"'Z ~~ f::t.:l 00 ~ 0/) C en ::3~ui' .9,..:"8 c 'E C .g 3 E 0 "i;i ~ Q (/) IlJ .2 cu >< ~ .~ .;:: ~cj "0 :-::: ~ Q ~ e ~ t.:: .;; >. ~ ~ a .E ~z- ~ _"='c ~~oo..~ uo 9 ::;) '3 ___ 0 1l @.~ ~ 4j <Il ~ ~ ~o O-t."i;i 0''-::3..... ~ ~5_ <( c..... I,) C 0 en s:: >. ... ~ l::: "-' ~ .~ ~ z '- <'l.... I,) 1,) .s:: ~....... @ ;:J w g.. ~ '3 51.9 'c [-a o.tB..E .... ~ . - "=' 4) I,) 0._ 5 Il,) 'U5 en vi <2 c"O ~ ~ .... ~ .2 g, en ,";:"".... cu .~ M ~4) ~ CI) ,.. I,) 0... - "-' ~ .^ -.. co _ w, _ o....,C....o Ut.L.lll,)oS::Il,)"i;i:.=: -0 .... '- 1lJ:;.... -:S...... Po.:'=:' u; >. ::3 .;:: !3 4)..2 ~ 0 00 I,) 0 .- ~ vi C. Il,) V"l -0::3 ....- lJl - <'l e <0=0 .:t Il,) Il,) E E s:: ~. lJl 1,)._ ;: OZ ~:a ~ ~ 5 s:: ~ ~ 0';:: .~ .~ ~ ~ i::. E'- 0. Il,) U s:: ~ ~ <'l <'l ~ ~ ~ ~ .S -a ~ 0 0:; ::3 J:l .5 .~ IlJ ... ,c; r- IlJ en... ~ en t;.:.o U .... .s:: >.:-::: <<~~-a~:tS::S::o~lEocu u~> ~ N -0 4)'- Il,) -0 Il,) GJ .f!::3.... E :c C cu Co?:3 la B ~ @ @ ~'E].9': 6"~ :t e-= O-~'O%iUco:.;2"Ocuo~. 2:!S> ~~~@s::Ecu~"O-u<Ill,)e~.98.s:: g......llJcoe<lEs::s::o@1l,)5cocut/l U ~ Q) .;:: 'E en ~ (oj ~ Vi E .:3 U la c:: 1$ :.c ::3 E co - 0...0"0 VI._ 0 <Il -0 ~ 'C - ::.. o 0 ::3 ... c:; 0 0 ::3 ~ U'Vi:::: .....J: ~ ;> u ~ '"5i ..9 :I: a..9 ..2 < ~ ~ -5 ~ r- ~.5 > u Z tI.l Co? < -0 . ~ s:: co.~ Uic::; ::3-0 ::;Ec: ::3 cu 0 ~t.1.. . "2 U r-cus:: NCI)_ ~"8 CI) 0.] Vi u 3.... (\I ~0..4) 0 <(-~'Vlg o...~ OJ) 5 ::I CI) g.5 N CIl , 0. -0 .;:: 0\ CI) .- .- 0 N"",,<:UM ~ .5 g ~.~ cu U clE 1:: ::3 O:CI) '- . oCog C"lU)_ >. i: IlJ . .0 U EoS ~J E ..0 0 N:I: " o o 0 o 0 o 0 - ~ co 0\ o r-: .... c ~ 4) s:: '5 ~ t: .- ~ _ >.0. o_Q)~cu @ ~g~~~~bh~~'E 4) u. 0 u c ~ 2,.g .;; s; u t: .c e .;:: > 0.. ~ ~ ~ ~~fr ;g~Po.IlJ....E .... ...._~:.=: ::3'Cl dO (\I~ 4) .- t/l -e.c Po.- tIlO'" l,)::Ica_-oo.. c:: t: J LL. ~ .0 _ =' c:a O~3Jc~"'ed-. ~ E .... U .- > ... or _ 0 '" ~ >..'s 'E -0 "t:l ..9 -g @ ~ E o g,..2 ~ ~@ ~;oj 6b~.g ~ ~ co '" IlJ ::3 ~-5 J.:?; ~~5 E ~~~ u'r:; l:a -5 4)'2 o..'C Po.._ '0 .- ;>:t S::::I >< U 0 .c u t 4) It: g 0 E cu IlJ ';;; 01)= ~ g 0 E ';:: E ~:::: Q).5 g (\1m 13 S::S::U~c: ~ u; "t:l -g .- 8 .~ ~ .:;: ~ Il,) 'ijj'Vi c:: ell @ I,) \..:0 ::3 r; '" ... c:: "l <'l C 00'- C1J.~ '" ",..9 .co ~ t: 0 0.... a 00.'0 oS:: E u >. ~ .- 0.. cu ... ~ m E Cii IlJ en en co .;:: U ~ 0. 0. - U,- U cu co '" U E 4) .9- -; .- :I: .;:: @ U ~ "0 0:= ::I Vi ~ IlJ .;:: cu .g 0:::: U fr 8".S ~ oS 5 -:S UJ -g '5 u c:: ..... '- '0 >,u< c .-=: oS U ~ os::. "" 0._ ::3 VI > ..... C'" cu?co ::J ~ ~.~ >- c. ...:'30~N~ MLL.UCI)r"lr- d' o >.'::; tIl l':I fr 'u _ 0 ._ m o.m UJ<: . A W fD ~ Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Meeting Date: ~B <6,\q,q~ Final Agpnda Item # SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Authorize City Manager to renew a one-year Agreement with the Pinellas County Sheriff to provide latent fingerprint examination, and related services, as well as crime scene services including evidence and property storage to the Clearwater Pol ice Department for a period of one year, from October 1, 1999 through September 30, 2000 for a total cost of $373,712.30, which is the minimum sum due for all services to be rendered during the term of this Agreement, IS and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: . The Pinellas County Sheriff's Office and the Clearwater Pol ice Department have had this contractual arrangement since January 1, 1994. This contract covers latent print examination, evidence storage and crime scene processi ng, . The total cost of the contract is $373,712.30, which is a -0- percent increase over last year's contract. Of this total cost, $70,006.49 is for latent fingerprint services and the balance, $303,705.81, is for evidence storage and a base workload of 2000 crime scene processing calls for the contract period based on a rate of $136.83 per call. The 2000 crime scene call base was provided by the Clearwater Police Department for the Sheriff's use in establishing his manpower and equipment allocations. Billing for requests for service in excess of 2000 calls during the period of this agreement will be invoiced at the rate of $136.83 per call. . At the request of the Pinellas County Sheriff's Department, this 2000 call figure is based on a 1 year period to coincide with their fiscal year. During this period, the Police Department estimates that this call figure will be met. . Funding for this Agreement is available in the Police Department's operating budget code: 010-01121- 53030-521-000. NA Info Srvc Public Works DCMlACM Other NA NA Originating De t: Polic Ie ~ Costs Total 373712.30 Risk Mgmt Polic Attachments Current FY ..()- Funding Source: CI OP X Other , ,I}- Submitted by: City Manager Printed on recycled paper o None A ro riation Code: 010-01121-530300-521-000 Rev. 2/98 I, . ' ';' ;' ~ ~. , ,,4.;' " " : ' t' '...; . '.: . ~. ,/~., Y " '"7 ~l".d.l ~ ~i,,', : ,'./',~tf,,~;-. ',~:'t',J' "\,' ,.,J ~"~_ ~':.',\' }-.".., .f.. .J.':~.t ,:...:J",.k '~,' J~':,: . '" '~j,". ,~.~ e PD d- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Meeting Date: ~ ?("ICf,91 Final Agenda Item # SUBJECT/RECOMMENDA liON: Approve an addendum to the agreement between the City of Clearwater and the School Board of Pinellas County, Florida providing for the continuation of the School Resource Officer program, for the 1999/00 school year at Clearwater High School and Countryside High School, (g] and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same, SUMMARY: · Under the terms of the three-year agreement between the School Board of Pinellas County and the City of Clearwater, the City will provide law enforcement and related services to Clearwater and Countryside High Schools during the regular school year. The assigned officers will provide instruction in law education, service as resource persons, conduct investigations, provide security and maintain the peace, make arrests and provide support services as necessary. · The School Board will reimburse the City, for the 1999/00 contractual terms, the sum of $33,612.06 base salary, per school resource officer, or a total of $67,224.12. This is a 4% increase in the rate reimbursed to the City for the 98/99 school year. Payments are to be made in quarterly installments. · Additionally, overtime costs related to school functions will be reimbursed to the City by the School Board. The actual costs to the City for providing the School Resource Officers at Clearwater and Countryside Hi gh Schools is a total of $100,489.81. 1 he difference between the actual costs and amount reimbursed is offset by the benefit of the program to the community and the Police Department. · The Police Department has maintained a good working relationship with the School Board. School Resource Officers have been assigned to Clearwater High School since January 1, 1985 and to Countryside High School since January 1, 1986. ~:;~~wed bl2~: Budget . Purchasing A Risk Mgmt NA Info SNC Public Works DCM/ACM Other NA NA Originating ~Pt: POLICE".. i~/~-. User Dept. (~ POLICE "-. J /~""- 'It Attachments Costs Total -0- Funding Source: Current FY 33,265.69 CI OP Other Submitted by: City Manager lI' -0 Printed on rec~c1ed paper o None Appropriation Code:Ol0-01138-510100-521-00() Rev. 2/98 ~ I'~: "f",':: '',,~ ~..~" ,..~ '. ~.'.. po'" .':._, ' 't;."'_",'~.~ "I '.'". t :, ',', "\":: '" 't'>,', :' "',";" " '''~' I .:;;:l'.~"'~ . ~ \) ~ Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Meeting Date: ;(0 ~~ Final Agenda Item # SUB IECT IRECOMME N DA liON: Approve a lease agreement between RSGN, Inc., a Florida Corporation, as Lessor, and the City of Clearwater, as the Lessee, for the premises located at 1217 A N. Ft. Harrison Ave., Clearwater, FL for a period of three years commencing on October 1, 1999 and terminating on September 30, 2002, at an annual rental of $7,260.00. 1&1 and tnat the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: · The Clearwater Police Department's goal of providing community based police services often requires the establishment of temporary or longer term police substations in various neighborhoods. A substation has been maintained in the Old Clearwater Bay area since 1994. · The Clearwater Police Department wishes to renew a lease with RSGN, Inc. for office space at a highly visible location for the administration and operation of police related activities. The terms of the lease provide for an increase of $55 monthly over the current lease, otherwise the terms of the renewal are consistent with the current lease. The lease is for a three year period. · Utility expenses are the responsibility of the police department and are estimated at $1,100.00 annually. Reviewed bY~ Legal :.J Budget Purchasing A Risk Mgmt NA Info Srvc Public Works DCMlACM Other NA NA Costs Total 7,260. l(h~ Funding Source: Current FY -0- CI OP X Other ft- Attachments Submitted by: City Manager Printed on recycled paper o None A ro riation Code: 010-01132-544200-521-000 Rev. 2/98 :,J!, I.' "',I} . '. " "'J , I:;.:,;"~l~j ~f':-~}l/I.; >"1' ...... .lr~~i'l, ,\ J~/:::''-;''~ ':'7:i",,~~..~ ":IJ ,,' '.t,,',. .."''''',\!,: 'l ~ ,.:'. ,: :.(\, \'\'t"~.<"" Il<~ll't.l ...... PW1- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Work session Item II: Final Agenda Item # ~\ Meeting Date: 08/05/99 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for the Gulf to Bay Blvd. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Old Coachman Rd. to Belcher Rd. and Westward) (9B-0152-EN) to MORELLI LANDSCAPING, INC. of CLEARWATER, FLORIDA for the sum of $110,087.18 which is the lowest responsible bid received in accordance with the plans and specifications, with an option to continue with Phase 2 of the project for the not to exceed sum of $ 85,877 .B2 for a cumulative total of $195,965.00 for both phases. l!J and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: · The scope of work is to provide all labor, materials, equipment, supervIsion, maintenance of traffic (MOT); transportation, and other services necessary to remove existing sod and 12" of existing soil from proposed median planting areas, backfill with clean fill and to install landscaping and irrigation according to plans and specifications, which includes a one year warranty period for all palms, and a six month warranty period for all other plant materials. · EXTENT OF WORK: The first phase consists of seven (7) medians located from Old Coachman Rd. to Belcher Road. The quantities shown on the bid sheet are actual quantities based on the FOOT approved plans, Phase 2 will consist of seven (7) medians located from Belcher Road to Highland Avenue. · The quantities shown are based on staff's best estimate of what will be approved by FOOT. Payment will be based on the unit prices of the bid. lit TIMING OF WORK: Work on Phase 1 will commence upon execution of the contract and will be completed in 60 days. Phase 2 is estimated to begin about October, 1999, but not later than early November, 1999 and also will be completed in 60 days. Reviewed b~ Originating Dept: Costs $195,965,00 Legal , . Info Srvc =i Public Works Ad . istration. Total Budget ~ Public Works User Dept, Funding Source: Purchasing OeMI ACM Public Works A nistration Current FY X CI X Risk Mgmt NJA Other Attachments OP (~ Othe r Submitted by: ~ City Manager Y' [g] None Appropriation Code: 315-92262-563500-541-000 - Printed on recycled pllper Rev.2/98 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Median Landscaping lInd Irrig"tlon ,.,.. ." t '" ~ .' ,:.:".. i, ' ',.",',~:t':.~ "'*' 'J,'l .:!'~ ,)," '.; ~i>~,...: ".,t 'h.'... ')til', ~. ;-:,'..;15;' ,~.),\~u.j:,;t~ ',I,!,'.t)"f"" \ 1. .~ ~1":/''!'."ltj;Sr:!:~:},: .~t.~~:~ i 06~ '~fS Q:" ~' 11II I Ii I ...: vi VI Z ;( :2 'O~ HlOOa N311nN:ln LJ t ci 0: >ii!VrcONVl AVM ~ QO. -'cz,7." ~ ~ fJ. ~ ~ ,~~ ~-;. tr,. ~' o ~ ~ ENn:Rq~ Ii vi 4J. fH: is rr' SO z 61 's'n g 31: ~ i3 '~ % ~ '% O~~ OVl IX 5 'O~ ijJ.o138 i!i I~ ~ < Z 13 1l 0: O).'"'J.' 5 '3f\V VI::>iwVd '311'1 33>tnVM111'l ..61 'S'n :n\f o o ~.f;' o ~t' ~ '1,f;' o ~ G Po tii c:i 6 IX 0 Z ~ '" :::> z II) lS Ii ll. 'O~ Tlnos vi ~ ~ z i1: 99 '~rs ~ NV~H:)VO::l 010 'Oij l:I3H::l138 'Ol:l Q c:i [] IX 0: g ~ :2 'Gel '3^V S31IY.>I:GH c:i a: I- z o Q. l- i>: z :::> III ~ 'Ol:l 3N33>l '),\ v NijNVS ...: Ill. 25 z :::> t lJ'l .t ","'oGE.. :<S\ot ~':" . . e~. ...: VI ~ w IS ~ o co ~ rti , NO.LdIWH, 61 's'n ~ ~ 0)' $ ~ ) ,#0 >- < CIl 'OM M3HJI3H t\l g Q) rn ~ .J:: ,Po. ...: III 00 ::lE-< ..l ~t>:.. ~...:I u::J o >- IX W VI g IX c:i ::l 0: z 'Ol:l J: 3N33>1 ~' w ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ci 'l:IO 3>lVl IX 0 "3AV GNV1H DIH ~p 5 ~....: 0: '?, VI 0 I- 0: a 3NVl A.L138 u '),\ V Il:InoSSl1'l '),\'1 nUIA" IX x a u u '3.\'1 NOSll:Il:IVH 'U '3;\ v ONV1H DIH SDNI>ld- j' ~ fr- ~ g 04 t;j ~ ~if~P ~30Q3 m '. 6/ 's', . ~nJ.71o' ~ J · <c.ol'/' ~.7/ 1 AVMHDIH o j ~ ~ :t .... j )1f ('Qj I 'j 9.!l '1 ~ {J o __I .J ~ ~. \',(' jr;'... ". ;, ~. ' I' ..!" Jt ~~f! ~ I.', i' ,! . I~I .... ".. .' ~ . <" n; I:~, t:,'f \;;*, '~I". "f". ~~..'~ ::' " ': " t.' I~.j , I' ",4 ,)t(JJ~ ~ ~)r\f.J..f~J,l,;",;, "' /:"'", :', 'tf~'t;:,; 'J, -,,^lri~ f ~. f: :' '</;1 . . ;~.\":!. . pw~ Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Work session Item #: Final A~enda Item # ~~ MeetinQ Date: 08/19/99 SUBJECT/RECOM M ENDA TION: Approve the McKim & Creed Work Order for Engineering Services for Disinfection Facility Design - Northeast APe Facility in the amount of $119,000,00. I!I and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: · The City currently houses gaseous chlorine storage and handling systems in the first floor of the main control building at the Northeast Advanced Pollution Control Facility. Moving this existing hazardous chemical to a new, updated and separate building will improve the safety and reliability of the system. This project will consist of the design of two (2) options for new disinfection facilities. · The first design will be a standard gaseous chlorine system, This type of disinfection system uses containers of liquid chlorine to supply a gas for the disinfection of the wastewater. as is currently being used at the Northeast APC Facility and throughout the City, Because of the potential hazards, the gasevus chlorine system requires two (2) additional details, a Process Safety Management program to provide for employee safety and a Risk Management Plan to provide for accidental releases of chlorine gas. · The second design will use on-site generation of a chlorine solution for disinfection, This system uses salt, electricity, and water to produce the chlorine solution, and does not require either a Process Safety Management program or a Risk Management Plan. · With both systems designed, the City will be able to competitively bid the two (2) options and assess the value of each as it relates to capital investment and the risk reduction potential. In addition to improving safety for on-site personnel, the City will also reduce the hazardous material emissions risk to the public. . The available balance in Chlorine Handling Capital Improvement Project Revenues, 315-96658. is adequate to fund this project, and is part of the six year improvement plan included in the utility rate study last year. . McKim & Creed is one of the City's Engineers-of-record, and this work order was negotiated in accordance with the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act. Reviewed by: Legal ~ Info Srvc Budget ~UbIiC Works purchasing../..-, _ .. (DCM/ACM Risk Mgmt NA Other !' Originating Dept: Public Works Administ )It ion User Dept. WPC ) V // t J Total Costs Current FY $119,000.00 Funding Source: CI X OP Other Attachments I Submitted by: City Manager ~ o Printed on recyc: led paper Work OLuer available for review in City Clerk Department o None Appropriation Code: 315-96658-5611 nn 1:'21:: non Rev, 2/98 Dlslnfectlon design kjo f>vJ ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT McKIM & CREED ENGINEERS WORK INITIA liON FORM Jd-- DATE:June1~1999 City Project No: D1 -062599 M/C Project No: 1. PROJECT TITLE: Disinfection Facility Design - Northeast APe Facility 2. SCOPE OF WORK: SUMMARY: The City proposes to construct a new disinfection system at the Northeast Advanced Pollution Control (APC) Facility site. This new facility and new equipment will replace outdated equipment and allow the City to move the chlorine handling function from its current location within the main control building at the Plant. This will improve the safety and reliability of handling chlorine by separating this from the same building that houses personnel and main plant controls. The City is considering two optional types of disinfection systems, The first would utilize chlorine gas much like the current operation. The new facility would include a new building for cylinder storage and a chlorination equipment room constructed identical to the facility the City has at the East APC Facility, The design would include an update to this type of building to current building codes and would also incorporate minor modifications to allow for easier implementation of gas scrubbing systems in the future should the City decide to add these systems to the building. PW99155 The second option would utilize on-site hypo-chlorite generation systems to create 8% sodium hypo-chlorite solution for the disinfection of treated effluent. The facility required for this process would include a building to house the generation equipment, brine storage tank, solution storage tanks with containment systems, shelter from sun and weather, and chemical feed systems and associated electrical, mechanical and control systems. This project will be coordinated with and constructed as part of the Northeast Organics Expansion project and the Northeast Reclaimed Water Storage and Pumping Facility. The City intends to develop design documents for both options and obtain bid pricing on both options as part of the overall project bid package. The services to be provided by McKim & Creed include the following: A. DESIGN OF CHLORINE BUILDING AND FEED SYSTEM (OPTION A) 1) Schematic Design Phase a) Develop preliminary floor plans and sections based on the building designed for the East APC Facility. b) Develop preliminary electrical, plumbing and ventilation plans for the facility. Include the electrical feed and stand-by power requirements in the design of the electrical building for the reclaimed water facilities at the north end of the plant site. c) Confirm chemical feed system requirements and equipment lists for the new building. --:.. CITY OF CLEARWATER - Chlorine Building - Northeast AWT Facility June 14, 1999 Page 2 d) Prepare schedule of interior and exterior building finishes. e) Develop layout of building and associated facilities on the site to include access to the building. f) Submit schematic plans to the City for review and acceptance prior to beginning final design. g) Prepare a preliminary estimate of construction costs for the chlorine handling building. 2) Final Design Phase a) Prepare building plans, elevations, and sections including architectural features, structural design, plumbing, and mechanical systems. b) Prepare exterior finish details. c) Prepare interior finishes for walls, ceiling, floors, hardware, doors, and windows, d) Prepare technical specifications and details for the building and chemical feed systems. We have assumed that the City will not require chlorine gas scrubbers systems at this time. e) Prepare system design for chlorine injection at the new chlorine contact tank and for the various - application points at the Northeast Plant. Provide design of chlorination equipment and control systems. PVv'99155 1) Prepare design of lighting and electrical power systems for the building. g) Prepare design modifications to the site for proposed building to include driveways, sidewalks, and utility services. Coordinate design of site improvements with the reclaimed water facilities project. h) Submit fifty, seventy-five and ninety percent complete drawings and technical specifications to the City for review. i) Incorporate final design documents into the bidding package prepared for the Northeast Organics Expansion and the reclaimed water facilities. j) Provide an updated estimate of construction costs. k) Permitting for this facility will be included with the applications made for the Organics Expansion project and the Reclaimed Water Storage and Pumping Facility projects. J~ CITY OF CLEARWATER - Chlorine Building - Northeast AWT Facility June 14, 1999 Page 3 B. DESIGN OF ON-SITE HYPOCHLORITE SYSTEM (OPTION B) 1) Schematic Design Phase a) Develop preliminary floor plans and sections for the hypochlorite generator building and solution storage areas. - b) Develop preliminary electrical, plumbing and ventilation plans for the facility. Include the electrical feed and stand-by power requirements in the design of the electrical building for the reclaimed water facilities at the north end of the plant site. c) Develop chemical feed system layout. Confirm chemical feed system requirements and equipment lists for the new building. d) Prepare schedule of interior and exterior building finishes, e) Develop layout of building and associated facilities on the site, f) Submit schematic plans to the City for review and acceptance prior to beginning final design. g) Prepare a preliminary estimate of construction costs for the on-site hyp~chlorite system, 2) Final Design Phase PW99155 a) Prepare building plans, elevations, and sections including architectural features, structural design, plumbing, and mechanical systems. b) Prepare exterior finish details. c) Prepare interior finishes for walls, ceiling, floors, hardware. doors, and windows. d) Prepare technical specifications and details for the building including containment systems and chemical feed systems. e) Prepare system design for solution injection for the new chlorine contact tank and the various application points at the Northeast Plant. Provide design of chemical feed systems and control systems. f) Prepare design of lighting and electrical power systems for the building, CITY OF CLEARWATER - Chlorine Building - Northeast AWT Facility June 14, 1999 Page 4 g) Prepare design modifications to the site for proposed building to include driveways, sidewalks, and utility services. Coordinate design of site improvements with the reclaimed water facilities project. h) Submit fifty, seventy-five and ninety percent complete drawings and technical specifications to the City for review. i) Incorporate final design documents into the bidding package prepared for the Northeast Organics Expansion and the reclaimed water facilities. j) Provide an updated estimate of construction costs. k} Permitting for this facility will be included with the applications made for the Organics Expansion project and the Reclaimed Water Storage and Pumping Facility projects. C. CONSTRUCTION PHASE This Work Initiation Form assumes that the construction of one of the two options will occur together with the Organics Expansion project and the Northeast Reclaimed Water Project. The construction services therefore be provided under the Work Order for these projects. 3. PROJECT GOALS - WORK PRODUCTS: a. Design drawings of the proposed building for both optional systems. b. Technical Specifications for the building systems and chemical feed system components of the project for both optional systems, PVV99155 c, Complete contract document for the project utilizing the City standard fonnat and documents and include in the Contract Documents for the Northeast Organics Expansion Project. 4. BUDGET These services shall be performed for the lump sum fee amounts listed below: Option A Design Phase Option B Design Phase $ } 54,000.00 65.000.00 TOTAL: $ 119,000.00 CITY OF CLEARWATER - Chlorine Building - Northeast AM Facility June 14, 1999 Page 5 5. SCHEDULE Complete Schematic Phase Complete Final Design Phase August 2. 1999 November 26, 1999 6. STAFF ASSIGNMENTS: City: Joe Reckenwald and Ken Gilmore McKim & Creed: Street Lee, Dan Cote 7. CORRESPONDENCE/REPORTING PROCEDURES: All McKim & Creed Correspondence shall be directed to Street Lee. All City correspondence shall be directed to Joe Reckenwald. 8. INVOICING/FUNDING PROCEDURES: Please invoice monthly for work performed as detailed in McKim & Creed Continuing Contract. Charge this work to City Code No: 315-96658-561 ]00-535-000 PW99155 9. ENGINEER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify as a licensed Professional Engineer, registered in accordance with Florida Statute 471, that the above project's site and/or construction plans meet or exceed all applicable design criteria specified by City municipal ordinance, State, and Federal established standards, I understand that it is my responsibility as the project's Professional Engineer to perform a quality assurance review and these submitted plans to ensure that such plans are free from errors and/or omissions, Further, I accept that the City's Final Inspection for a Certificate of Occupancy does not relieve me of my own quality assurance review. I hereby certify that all facilities have been built substantially in accordance with the approved permit design plans and that any substantial deviations (described in attachment) will not prevent the system from functioning in compliance with the requirements of applicable regulatory authority. This certification shall apply equally to any further reVISion and/or submittal of plans, computations, or other project documents which I may subsequently tender. . II . .' . ..... \ '. .' . " , , '" . ". . CITY OF CLEARWATER - Chlorine Building - Northeast AWf Facility June 14. 1999 Page 6 10. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None PREPARED BY: CITY: ~~#~,(JJI3 ~Ich . aler. P.E. City Engineer McKim & Creed: . Street Lee. P .E. Project Manager PW99155 . " ". . , '..... , " Item #23 Q/I/G GM ~ Clearwater City Commission . - Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Meeting Date: ~3 ~.19,99 Final Agenda Item # SUBJECT /RECOMMENDA liON: Approve the First Amendment to Harborview Center Management Agreement which extends the term of the City of Clearwater's Agreement with Globe Facilities Services, Inc., for three (3) years beginning October 1, 1999 and expiring on September 30, 2002. J8J and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same, SUMMARY: . The original agreement was for a three-year term, which expired September 3D, 1998, with two (2) one- year options to extend by the City. The first option will expire September 3D, 1999, and the City has a second and final option to September 30,2000, . Background - In January 1995, Globe Facility Services, Inc. was hired by the City of Clearwater to operate the 1 st and 3rd floor of the Harborview Center. This includes the exhibit halls, meeting rooms, common areas, iobby areas, executive offices, storage and utility facilities, and other spaces, excluding the second floor which is occupied by Steinmart, Inc" and Pickles Plus Too, Inc.. . Instead of extending the option for one additional year, the City of Clearwater and Globe Facilities Services, Inc" agree to a three-year Extension Term beginning October 1, 1999, and expiring September 20, 2002, The City would have the right to terminate the agreement for any reason during the three-year extension term with six (6) months notice to Globe Facilities Services, Inc., without any further obligation on the part of the City. . Clearwater Code Sec. 2,564 (1 )(e) allows an exception to the bidding procedures if the purchasing agent determines that the service is impractical to bid. Due to the current status of the Harborview Center, the City Manager's office has determined that it is impractical to bid this agreement and would recommend approval of this amendment. . A copy of the First Amendment to Harborview Center Management Agreement is available for review in the City Clerk Department. Reviewed by: Legal ~ Budget N/A Purchasing N/A Risk Mgmt N/A Info Srvc Public Works DeW ACM Other (QOl) Qual ity of Life N/A N/A ~ ~ Originating Dept.: City Manager's Office User Dept.: Costs Total 0 Current FY FY99/00 Funding Source: CI N/A OP N/A Attachments ~ ~~ Other N/A Submitted by: City Manager Printed on recycled paper x None Appropriation Code: , . , .... ~ J' '.'. ." ~., . " . .' , .' \ ., -.,< ., u. CA 1- o >- ... u ONE CITY. ONE FUTURE. City Attorney's Office Memorandum TO: FROM: Honorable Mayo~ ~~d City Commissioners Pamela K. Akin, ~~ Attorney RE: Authorization for Settlement Charles and Gloria Johnson v. City of Clearwater Circuit Civil Case No. 98-3292-CI-11 DATE: August 2, 1999 Pursuant to discussions at the attorney-client session on August 2, 1999, authorization is hereby requested to accept the settlement offer of $57,500.00 in the above pending litigation case involving an accident between a private vehicle and a city vehicle. PKA:jrnp Copy to: Michael J. Roberto, City Manager d.: :.....~ ,. "'. '. t\ .... '-.' ,,.1>(" ~ J;.....~ ...-1., J-l': ~ . ";~~" '!~',,} ," ~.', L''oJ;>(:',,-,L:',,,,~,. -!i'HJ;;;'; '.\ ~~'i':"'7f':.'t&(~/'::;,~~~"\."iJr~.~f,t4 :',. \..:1 :.'!'~. : ."""'. M. ~ :1- Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Final Agenda Item # ':2. ~ Meeting Date: ~I SU 8 J Eel /RECOMMEN DATION: Approve amendment to the waiver agreement with Charles and Ypapanti Alexiou, property owners at 7 Rockaway Street, Clearvvater, Florida, 33767 and National Water Sports Ine. l&I and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The city entered into a waiver agreement with Charles and Ypapanti Alexiou, owners of Frenchy's Rockaway Grill, Ine. located at 7 Rockaway Street, Clearwater, Florida and National Water Sports, Ine. in October 1991. This waiver agreement allows them a corridor through which watercraft can traverse the restricted swimming area. Charles and Ypapanti Alexiou, through their attorney Mr. Kenneth A. Sunne, Esq., operates their waiver agreement business through National Water Sports, Ine. It is not necessary to have the business operator as an appl ieant on the waiver agreement. The waiver is assigned to Charles and Ypapanti Alexiou on Iy, as property owners. This amendment to the waiver agreement will add a tow ride to their existing activities. This ride seats five people and will be towed behind existing rental craft. The operation of rental watercraft from this location has been satisfactory and insurance requirements, with the city as additionally insured have always been maintained. All other conditions, limitations, restrictions and obligations of the waiver agreement wi 1\ remain in effect with this new amendment. Amendment to waiver agreement available for review in City Clerk Department Reviewed by: Legal ~.,-_ Budget N/A Purchasing -Glt- Risk Mgmt tJ}I- Info Srvc Public Works DCMlACM Other N/A N/A Originating ~: . Marine .l-rtC:>1----L User Dep~ ~ I Marine~~ Costs Total N/A Funding Source: CI OP Other Current FY Attachments 1. Letter from Mr. Kenneth A. Sunne, Esq. Submitted by: City Manager Printed on r'ecycled paper o None Appropriation Code: Rev. 2/98 i. .' . . ,'" ..... ~ ~ I ' , ' .'. " ". " _ \ . :; ,'~,' ~, . SUNNE & LOCKE, P. A. -;).'7 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1151 N.E, CLEVELAND STREET CL.E-'RWATER. FLORIDA 33755 KENNETH A. $UNNE JOHN C, LOCKE TEL.EPHONE (727) 461~3100 FAX 441.9007 EMAIL: sunnlock@gte.net July 26, 1999 Mr. William Morris Harbormaster Clearwater Marina 25 Causeway Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33767 Re: 7 Rockaway Street Owners: Sevasti and Y papanti Alexiou Dear Mr. Morris: At the request of your office. we are providing this letter on behalf of Sevasti Alexiou. surviving spouse of Charles Alexiou, and Ypapanti Alexiou, owners of the above property, agreeing to the addition of the "Big Banana" ride by National Water Sports in the corridor presently used by them for other watercraft rides and covered by the Waiver Agreement of November 7, 1994, and any amendments thereto. ~I dtJ~ Kenneth A. Sunne, Agent Sevasti and Ypapanti Alexiou "\ ....' ." ,:...' .' ~.. . ; .".' , ~ .' " .' ~ . . .' . ...." .....N...: .... ..., "'. ' . 1. :'. .: ,'. . I . . . ..... _ I. .. ' .... ,. MRd-. AMENDMENT TO WAIVER AGREEMENT ;)'] THIS AMENDMENT TO WAIVER AGREEMENT) made and entered into this of 1999) by and between the CITY OF CLEAR WATER) FLORID A) a municipal corporation) hereinafter referred to as "City") and Charles and Y papanti Alexiou) hereinafter referred to as "Owners") 7 Rockaway Street) Clearwater, Florida 33767. WHEREAS) the City and Owners entered into a Waiver Agreement November 7, 1994, for 7 Rockaway Street) Clearwater, Florida 33767; and WHEREAS, the City agrees to this amended waiver agreement with Owners pursuant to Section 33.117 City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, as a condition of said amended waiver, the Owners agree to faithfully observe, keep and perform the conditions described in this agreement: 1. The City grants the Owners request to add a commercial towing devise or "banana" to the existing watercraft types described in the original waiver agreement. 2. All other terms and conditions of the Waiver Agreement shall continue in full force and effect except as amended herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this amendment to the Waiver Agreement this _ day of , 1999. City of Clearwater) Florida By: Michael Roberto City Manager Approved as to form: Attest: John Carassas Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 1;;;1;d~ Kenneth A. Sunne Power of Attorney for Charles and Y papanti Alexiou, Owners Witnesses: ~ __ ~~ Ii, ~~ / '-- By: Alexiou - Rockaway Grill Waiver Page 1 ~.";.. ... . ': _. ,:. ~.. .;, ,. .' ....:..,. .l::':o...._,,'~....:._~.-. ,.;t', .J .: ".' ~,." '..~ ....: '~}"':';: .,'- ~..' ";~y~,',,~.'~,.,' :. \' ,.... ",,', : '. _' . ", pw3 Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Final Agenda Item /I ~?? 0' Meeting Date: C . l.3.:.:] 9 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDA TION: Approve the selection committee's ranking of consultants for more detailed engineering and financial analyses for two beach parking garages, and authorize staff to negotiate a scope of services and contract with the top ranked firm. o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same, SUMMARY: · On June 3 the Commission approved the Pier 60 Lot Plus and Pelican Walk sites for parking garages on the beach, and authorized Public Works Administration to move forward with more detailed engineering and financial analyses, · Staff solicited letters of interest from our seven engineers-of-record and five architects-of-record. e Six letters of interest were received, · The six firms made presentations to a selection committee consisting of members from the City Management team, Financial Administration and Public Works Administration. · The firms were ranked based on past experience in parking garages; creativity; financial expertise; architectural/structural expertise; a nd traffic operations expertise, · The staff ranking is as follows: 1) Parsons Engineering Science 2) Harvard Jolly Clees Tappe Architects 3) Tampa Bay Engineering 41 Camp, Dresser & McKee 5) Bitterli & Associates Architects 6) McKim and Creed. o The contract will be negotiated following procedures prescribed in the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act and City purchasing procedures, Reviewed by: Legal N/A Budget N/A Purchasing N/A -- Risk Mgmt N/A Originating Dept: Info Srvc ~ Public Works A Public Works User Dept, DCM/ACM Public Works Other ........- Attachments Costs $0 Total Funding Source: Current FY CI or Other Submitted by: City Manager o None A ro riation Code: N/A Printed on recycled pap3r 2/98 Rev. ~ .... . ..". ., I '." , , . . ", .' ~, ~ , ..' . # . " ' . " , . DW 3 Re= r ~dl~nrwater To: Interoffice Correspondence Sheet Mayor Brian J. Aungst and Commissioners From: Through Michael Roberto, City Manager Richard Baier, Public Works Administra~~ ~ ~13. Bill Horne, Assistant City Manager; Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk; Mahshid Arasteh, City Engineer cc: Date: August 1 2, 1999 RE: Parsons Engineering Science Team Booklet Please find attached herewith some information which the City Manager asked that I forward to you regarding Parsons Engineering Science Team. As you may know, the approval of the staff ranking for the recommended parking team for the Beach garages, is on Monday's work session. In addition, I was asked to let each of the Commissioners know that the renderings of any Clearwater proposed garages are conceptual only, RJB/nc Attachment r~:FCEIVEr AUG 1. 2 1999 SilV CU:.\-\X DE.~r. , . '. ._ ,;,. -So. ," .,. ~t ~,' l ,.'.' ~ . . ~ ". III [ r . r \ " ,~ ,..ITJTI~ ~ . · ~ Ct 'tJ a ~I:-~# \\~~...,'Jf V'o~~ fl.'" ~\\ . ...~ \/- ~ ~ 1..\. -V" .. ~ ~ . - ~ ~ ~ ' -~- -- ~ '-' ,.;-.;: . .... ~ ~ --.- -'~ . : :... -'~ II: : '. : :: =LU" _~... ",." ,L..... Q _ ...1.- -..../;. :.:: 0 : ~r.. ..~ ~ ~-:.. --_;. I'.::." \"~' .. :Jt)- -- '.. ! . ':: : ~ "" o .... QV''' /", \\ ~ ~ - ......... I ,: ...~ " fr~~;,. -- d //,';~ ..tl" .tt fi.'. ,\ ~;~+' ~...~, rl'J C' c. ~ ~ ~ ~ t'~~: ;~f'. ,:r' ~., cJ L. \. ~.. '\ ' I' I , · .. (I;~'~~ \ IT I to.", ,+ .~ .;,' t. f' '.. '..I..Jlfl~ .' . , t l L [ . .~ ,,~~, . -. - .. . I -1 " '.~., . -. . .... ., \'~ - .,,', . .. . . ~', l,'1 , " , I j L l l . . '. ~ :., , '~ '\ ~ , . . ~,.. \ . t . . . /.. ..... . . \ . B n Ll .~ I . , l_ : n r r.~ ( . r r [~ r'~ I ( r I l [ l L [ . ~ f('~ -:1 ~ ~~J ;17) ~~ ~,~ 'L ~~ ~~ l .-::::-t '~C'1) ~ L) " """"'" ~ ......... - , ',.' ~"'1" .. .~ '" .,.~ ;~~.~ <<i) ~:\l ) '-...:., ~S~ .~ ' " .. -"'- . . I I 'j' I \. . " . . . , . . t. . oJ . " " ........-.t......--.. ., I.' ' . . L1 r r" f " { 1~ ~1) ---., --1 ---, ~ U) "~ ~ :~-. ~ ......-4 ( \U) -----, .~~ [ ~ l~ 1 " 0 .. _ . 0 OM. ~,".... ' I " l~ n , \ l :' ro' ! [" s r~ r~ , , I . I f ~1 l :.'.-- '~~ r' .~ ,'G) -- ~ " .. r- - ~... " -, L) L GJ r ---, ~ (' (~ e,~~ {1~ ',' /'\ '. t,. - ;...~_. ~ .---..:1 1..:0.., L (~ l....~... - [. 'C: ,-- :.-. . '-. 0 _~ _ L l 6 , l : r: r'.. I f . r" r' r- L [ L ~'v1 """"'"' '..' -, ~ ~~.c ) ~"..to\. \'" ~~. .- ~ !f.,.... . ...... ' ~ ..~ , . 1~ L~ ~ L) IJ'~, \.'/:, . . 1"' ~ {:~) ~ ..'~ ~~~~ ~~ ~- ~.~ i...~.._ .-........ . -......-... .... .~.... (] r ''', ~ ' L f~ roo { r c r \ r ( ~ L L I ::~ "-~ ~ ,--..} /;' . ~. t" _:::--, l~ 'L) .,:" ., L) '~~ ~~ 1;) ,Q) ;~ .~ l..1 1 -. ---, \..-1 ---, ~.~ :q ;.:~ :.S >- r=-.,~ {L'1 '.~....... .~ L-- .. ~ ..,:::-"1 . ~. . . . ~ li r- \ ; ,.- t : r- [. ( ~ r- C' r f q [~ l~ L 1 . ~ ... ~<,If"',{j~ i-~ l~ ........., ........... .......~.._".. tI,~ '?a ,,:-, (l.:) s:~ ..., t...\)} ebb, l~ ~') , ..~ ~~ l',~ .~ ~-.. ~ t~} ,~ r~ t.~_~ - ~, (~) :~ ~~ '..U ... 1',~ i~ f~ 1) \.\,- ~. ~Af 1;1--',"'"" ~.... ll....;...;.~ (:~ ~S ~'---- ~ ,;,~ ~ ~\) 0,.....\\. ' ~~. ,,~, ~' ~.'~~ ~.llJ ~ .'. ". .. !~" ~ ... ~ t Ii ir II nj ~ .-~ .. ---., . I l . - ---- --., r : ~...~ '>,t) " .., '~.) h1-, .0) --, . '---, .. .......... 'vi .........-. ~ >~ ~Ll :~ U ~.~ ~ l) "'- {~ :,. - """""..:-I r' [ . [ ~ f- r' r 1 c [ /~~,...... .~ ~S ~=:l (C) ~.. .., r" : ~ ,/',:-' ,. ; i L r i I tJ ~ r ' i I ! i , / ' ( . f . r , I [ r" [' r [ l~ [ L r . ~ .' ,_,.J ." . . ~,.. ~,~. ~.,.:. ,',;' " ..~. r::.;, . t,-........ ~.~_. c.:....",. ~ iii', ~ ~ \~ 1.~ :1'" i~L) loti' :.. .., \.~ } 11-. "'. ~~ .- 1:C)) (~ (~ - .. ..:..-:--' 1.~ '..... .M ~~ ~ ;.~} (2' t.~~ i! fl 1-t ~t t..H . ,-1. ,: =---. -., t, "-- ~ - r:.:..~ (p) '..,.;.. (l.~ -.. Ii' fI~ ~ 6 (c) i1 '. ;\ ,l!)) ........~.;. . .~: . t I . . '~ I ~1 -- i , , l r ~ I I e,~ :'I~""""'" "" ~ ".. '-'. ~ .~ t ;4....." .........., . ""-~ .1) ~L .... '. ~ \L) .1l..., , zn I ---, ~~ [' ,:'1,~ ,'v1 ~-.. r . ~ L) r .0--, r -~ .~~ (~ ~. (1-;:) .> t. "I- I. ;.,.:......~ ~ .- t(._'''-~I_ L i~ IC-) \. t {~1 r \ ... ". -.- L. I . . ~ [ ,...... {j f~ r-: -, ( ~ . r r r~ r~ . I I L. c [ L f . ~ '.~ ~ ;.... ~ ..~ -,.. .~ ..~ ~L"~ ~~ ~~~. .~ - ~~~ .C) LQ ~\l l1,;:~ \,!-d _il Q'......~ ~~~ IL)', ..>~ ~-....:....... ~....~' -.:':~ '~J)~ ..":,,,'~ j:: It:'''-'l;,;-' ') ........ ': to.: <.: .,' . @ ~ :Ul .~..... ..~ _..,~.. .......,. -........ .'., .. _. r' ...... 1\.' ., t . \4 . ~ ~,-~ ,( \) ~~~ ~~ fC\ ~...., " ~~ (m\~ ,~~J e;~-, (Z'.w.'. ' I ~ ~ ...." !...~1 t~.) r;-~.,......~ ,~ ---- E._~,'""~ -"""'-l.... ;:"--- ...~ t.;::-, .~ ~ /"71.0.'.;1'1 }S ,~ ' , :D'''... " " t'p) ~1::"1 , '-.... \~) -- ,,~- , ~ ~~ ~.c....;. ,~ "';'"r ~::. <<i C ~~~ ,', "....' ~, ......:\ . :"-"~1 @t~ .'.~._.~""'#_. .._" .....,.., ....t_ ...4,1-'. .'''''f~.'.''''''. '. ,&.....,.. .,...,. -., '" -.. .. fJ [-~ r ~ I l f.. r- ( ~ I , ~ '. r r L { . L [ . , ' \ .' } \' . ~. .' '. . . . .... '.. ......, _..M. ..' t'''''''1'1 . ,....... '" r-:"W t,,~. "tl4't' ..-a--'''' ....... "" 1# f1 \, r . . r . 1.\ r~ r ... > - 'l ci <tJ Jl .( II 0 ~ .0 r ~ 7 r Q tl It r~ \II -() , .. \l ~ 1 It 4. . , \ I ,J l__ " i. <( 0 w % w L J: U (I) L~ . . -'. " \'. .-: ~.:' . '" . ',' '. . '. . ". fj I . I , I I I I' I l: r? i .. r ell .. r J- .. -4 r' ) eL f ' -4: .. I .J 1 ~ L l l~ f ' ..._, _..."'~. . . . ... ........- ~ ... oJ ". . ... :t: u - c( li o III ,tJ a1 w ]: w J: U C/) L t"l r . I ' L f ~ , . ( I . r . r [' r' f" L l~ . .' . c '~', . '. ., , , ,'" \ " J " " . '" - 'I \ ' ,.' . . . .~., . ". '. . . . '. "~.". .' " . . Item #29 0; 7;< \ . ~\ ~ \\Y Clearwater City Con1n1ission Agenda Cover Menlorandunl Worksession Item #: Meeting Date: ~9 <6. 1<1. Q'1 Final Agenda Item # SUBJECT IRECO M M ENDA TION: Amend the project scope for the Drew Street Widening project and approve the transfer of $550,000 from the S.R, 60 Corridor Enhancement capital project to the Drew Street Widening capital project. o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: · Drew Street is a primary east-west corridor connecting U .S, 19 and Alternate 19. The existing condition between Highland Avenue and Northeast Coachman Road has no center turn lane and narrow 19') travel lanes. The Drew Street Widening project will add a 14' center turn lane and enlarge the travel lanes to 11'. The project is a joint project with FDOT. The City is paying the design costs, FDOT is paying the construction costs, Pinellas County has completed a similar project from Northeast Coachman Road to U.S. 19, · In order to minimize the creation of non-conforming residential lots due to required right-of-way takings, it is now proposed to reduce the project limits to be from Saturn Avenue to Northeast Coachman Road only, · This change in project scope has resulted in a Supplemental Design Work Order for $292,966, which includes: · Revise all roadway, signalization and signage and marking plans to reflect new project limits; · Modify drainage and utility designs and revise drainage and utility plans; and e Modify SWFWMD permit. Public Works DCM/ACM Other Attachments Current FY Funding Source: CI OP Other · There is also a Supplemental Design Work Order which is necessary regardless of the project limits for $286, 140, which includes: · Relocation and enhancement of Corona Avenue school crossing as requested by Pinellas County Schools to improve safety; · Revise traffic signal orientation and add pedestrian crossing at Drew/ Northeast Coachman intersection as requested by the City; · Review of right-of-way taking "cure" plans for compatibility with design plans; Reviewed by: Legal N/A Budget ~ Purchasing ~A Risk Mgmt N/A Info Srvc Originating Dept: Public Works Admi 1; fratiol1 User Dept. Public Works Ad Costs None Additional Total Submitted by: City Manager 00 None A ro riation Code: N/A Rev. 2/98 U Printed on recycled paper .<, """ .. Agenda Memorandum- Drew Street Widening Page Two a9 . Incorporate "as-built" information from Highland Avenue and Drew Street east of Northeast Coachman construction projects; and . Revise utility relocation plans to separate gas from water and sewer, as required by FOOT. . The original City budget for the design phase was $1,300,000, funded by Pennies I in FY 1996/97. $1,213,950 of this is encumbered to date. This leaves a funding shortfall of $493,056. To cover this $493,056 shortfall and future contingencies, it is necessary to transfer $550,000 to the Drew Street project. . The S. R. 60 Corridor Beautification capital project includes local option gas tax revenues exceeding $550,000. Due to FOOT permit constraints, various Gulf to Bay enhancements originally contemplated are no longer planned. These include median nlonuments and coloring, and sidewalk coloring. Estimated costs for these items exceeded $1,000,000. Consequently the $550,000 could be transferred with no adverse impact on the Gulf to Bay project. Cc.~ 08/19/99 10:12 fJ727 596 1116 SHERATON SANDKEY raJ 002/002 re- 30 RUSSBLL A, KIMBALL (RUSS KIMBALL) Residence: . 1546 Exealiber Drive Clearwater, Florida 33764 (727) 536-1609 shera~oD Sand Key Resor~ 1160 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater Beach, rL 34630 (813) 727-1611 Married - Martha Kimball, A'tborney 2 Adu1~ Daugh~ers Ktmber17 K~al1 - A~1aD~a, Georgia Kerry Ximba11 - A~laD~a, Georgia 1966 - BS Degree - Florida S~a~e universi~7 Bootel and Res'taurao't Manageaell~ Business: Personal: BdQca~ioD: 1975 - Present Shera~OD Saud Key Resort 1160 Gulf Boulevard Clearwa~er, Florida 33756 Bxecu~ive Vice President and GeDer~l Manager Commissioner Hart's recommendation for Fire Task Force . ~'." .~'/.. ..:' ,.:..,'.', >.'i "'; :,_'~ ..'....~..".; ....'.J. ."-":"__,.', 'T ': J_~...r;,_~; .I~,.~' ~~:_,~-" t....:" '_, "'''''. ~_~.,... '....~ .'~_! ,: Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Meeting Date: 3\ 8.1'1.91 Final Agenda Item # SUBJECT/RECOMMENDA TION: To approve a contract with Siemon & Larsen not to exceed $66,480.00 in conjunction with the Downtown Request for Developer Qualifications. l&I and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: · The City Commission, has by consensus, directed staff to proceed with a Request for Developer Qualifications (RFDQ) for the "Bluff" area of Downtown, · Staff believes that Siemon & Larsen will provide valuable services in conjunction with this project because the firm's experience in redevelopment projects, relationships with developers nationally and expertise in assessing development proposals. · The scope of work, as outlined in an attachment to the contract, covers specific tasks from finalizing the RFDQ to recommendation to the City Commission on the ranking of the development teams. · The City may at its discretion terminate the contract with ten (10) days written notice. · Funding for this contract will be provided by the transfer of $66,480 of general fund revenue savings in project 315- 94602, Municipal Services Public Safety Complex, to establish a new project, 315-94607, Downtown Bluff Development. Reviewed by: Legal ...~ Budget .)'?z-- Purchasing N/A Risk Mgmt N/A Info Srvc N/A Public Works N/A DCtvVACM N/A Other- Finance vm).. Originating Dept: Economic Developmen User Dept. Economic Development Attachments Costs Total 66,480 Submitted by: 'i). II A J City ManO!ger ~ - Printed on recycled paper o None Funding Source: CI )C OP Other Appropriation Code: 315.94607-530300.519.000 Current FY Y Rev. 2/98 ., 'J' CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT made this day of 1999, by and_between the City of- ClealWater, Florida (City), P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater Florida 33758, and Siemon & Larsen, P.A. (Consultant). WHEREAS, City desires to have Consultant provide consulting services for the proposed request for developer qualifications (RFDQ) for the .Blutr area In downtown , L NOW THEREFORE, the City and Consultant do hereby Incorporate all terms and Clearwater, Florida; and WHEREAS, Consultant agrees to provide the consulting services described in Exhibit A, under the terms and conditions of this Agreement; conditions in Exhibit · A. and mutually agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant shall provide those services generally described in Exhibit -A-1. and as detailed in Tasks 1 through 11 in Exhibit .A.2.. 2. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. One (1) year from the date of this Agreement 3. REPORTS. Consultant agrees to provide to City reports on the Project upon request by the City. 4. COMPENSATION. The City will pay Consultant a sum not to exceed $66,480.00, inclusive of all expenses as further described in the Estimated Budget of Exhibit -A-3-. The City may, from time to time, require changes in the scope of the project of Consultant to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase in the amount of Consultant's compensation and changes in the terms of this Agreement which are mutually agreed upon by and between City and Consultant shall be effective when incorporated in written amendment to this Agreement. 5. METHOD OF PAYMENT. Consultant shall bill City, and City agrees to pay after approval of the City Project Manager under the terms of the Florida Prompt Payment Act F.S. 218.70. " 8. CONTACTS FOR RESPONSIBILITY. Charles L. Siemon will be designated 88 Project Director for this project by Consultant to manage and supervise the performance of this Agreement on behalf of Consultant. Associated with the Project Director will be staff members whose experience and qualifications are appropriate for this Project. The City will be represented by Michael J. Roberto, or his designee for all matters relating to this Agreement. 7. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT. The City at its sole discretion may terminate this contract by giving Consultant ten (10) days written notice of its election to do so and by specifying the effective date of such termination. The Consultant shall be paid for its services through the effective date of such termination. Further, if Consultant shall fail to fulfill any of its I obligations hereunder) this contract shall be in default, the City may terminate the contract, and Consultant shall be paid only for work completed. 8. NON-DISCRIMINA liON.. There shall be no discrimination against any employee who is employed in the work covered by Agreement, or against applicants for such employment, because of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin. This provision shaJJ Include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rate of payor other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 9. INTERESTS OF PARTIES. Consultant covenants that its officers, employees and shareholders have no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be . perfonned under this Agreement. 10. INDEMNIFICA liON AND INSURANCE. Consultant agrees to protect, defend, . indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees and agents free and harmless from and against any and all losses, penalties, damages. settlements, costs, charges, professional fees or 2 other expenses or liabilities of every kind and character arising out of or due to any negligent act or omission of Consultant or its employees in connection with or arising directly or indirectly out of this Agreement and/or the performance hereof. Without limiting Its liability under this Agreement, ~ Consultant shall procure and t1)alntaln during the life of this Agreement professional liability insurance coverage. This provision shall survive the termination of this Agreament. 11. PROPRIETARY MATERIALS. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall transfer, assign and make available to City or its representatives all property and materials in Consultant's possession belonging to or paid by the City. 12. ATTORNEYS FEES. In the event that either party seeks to enforce this Agreement through attorneys at law, then the parties agree that each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs, and that jurisdiction for such an action shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in Pinellas County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant, have executed this Agreement on the date first above written. Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: Brian J. Aungst, Mayor-Commissioner Michael J. Roberto, City Manager Approved as to form: Attest: . John Carassas, Asst. City Attomey Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk ::~~ ~har1eS L. Siemon Its: '/t(l;{rJ tI( I . S:'Agreement\Siemon-esa 3 . I . ">\', wI...'-. C. ~, . :':J::J .. . ...C'" . ::I.t..I\"I" 01 ,-"".;c...' .. .... .~ SIEMON & LARSEN . Mizner Par1c 433 PIIzI Real. Sul\t 331, BOC1I Raton, F\or1dI 33432 TelepholWJ (561) 36&-3801- Flctlmile (5&1) ~a E-MAIl- IlmboeaGga\e.r\eC July 29, 1999 Mr. Rick Hedrick Assistant City Manager City of Clearwater 112 South Osceola Ave Cl~ter. Florida 33756 Dear Rick: Attached pleaso find a proposed Scope of Services in regard to the proposed request for developer qualifications ("RFDQ") for the ''Bluff" in downtown Clearwater. The scope covers the final preparation of the RFDQ including graphics through the final ranJd"1 of the qlU1Jl~ developers by the City CoD\D\ls,sion. In preparing this scope and budget. we have assumed that we will play an active role in all phases of the RFDQ initiative and that developel ranking will be completed in app~nutfe1y one hundred and eighty (180) days or less. In regard to the budget, we have proposed a high and . low budget, depending on the. number of J:CspoDSCS and the amount of work required to make the selection. It should be noted that 1he scope and budget do not include professional fees 83SOCiated with negotiating a public private partnership agreement or land conveyances. ... Ckl~~~ Charles L. Siemon e., CLSIlmr Enclosure ,. . Exhibit A-I , . "<-.0'\:: ~ ". .... ""-T":~ ',""'-:' ;.. , ,... (.t,' '.,. _~..: '. ~'. ',~." ,',' . ~ '. "-~) ""~'.". " .....~. "',~"~(<' .-:.... '_.~<.~ '.' ....:...{ to':.~ '~--:. ~ '':.,\ ~ " Task 1. Task 2. Task 3. Task 4. Task 5. Task 6. 'I'ask 7. Task 8. Task 9. Task 10. Task 11. ....f<' Downtown Clearwater Bluff Request for Developer Qualifications Scope of Services Finalize RFDQ. 8&L will prepare a final RFDQ, including all attachments in "camera ready" form. Production of RFDQ. S&L will assist the City in the production and distribution of the RFDQ to candidate developers. Respond to Inquiries. S&L will be available to respond to candidate developer inquiries in regard to the RFDQ, other One City. One Future projects or other data. Pre-submission Conference. S&L will organize and conduct a pre-submission conference for candidate developers, Supplemental Information. 8&L will assist the City in responding to candidate developer requests for additional information or documentation. Review Statements of Qualifications. S&L shall review all Statements of Qualifications which are received by the City. Confirmation Research. S&L shall conduct research to confirm submission information and references. Prepare Analysis of Statements of Qualifications. S&L shall prepare a written assessment of the relative merits of each of the Statements of Qualifications received by the City. Meet with Selection Committee. S&L shall assist the City's selection committee to review and rank candidate developers. Prepare Written Recommendation. S&L shall prepare a written recommendation reflecting the ranking of candidate developers and the reasons for the rankings. Participate in Commission Decision. S&L shall participate in the City Commission's consideration of the proposed ranking of the candidate developers, .,.......-:;:j:l.::::..,~.,.:,;~...;~~:~,#:;-~;~...,:~ .',\\ :'.~'..';.'.,__I~..':'.'_. ""u.:,.,..~. "~;" "~"""I( '.l':~' _~. . . .~......'. ,:",~_":','.:-::'~'~~'~.l.\'.~ .'\. :,'.': ,:.:~ fill Dowlltown Clearwater Bluff Request for Developer Qualifications Estimated Budget TASK FEES COSTS TOTAL LOW HIGH LOW HIGH 1. Finalize RFDQ $5,680 $5,680 $500 $6,180 $6,180 . 2. Production of RFDQs $3,180 $3,180 $01 $3,188 $3,180 3, Respond to Inquiries $3,840 $3,840 $02 $3,840 $3,840 4. Pre-submission Conference $6,160 $6,160 $500 $6,660 6,660 5. Supplemental Information $4,040 $4,040 $0 $4,040 $4,040 6. Review SOQs $3,000 $6,000 $0 $3,000 $6,000 7. Confirmation Research $3,960 $6,960 $500 $4,460 $7,460 8. Prepare Analysis of SOQs $4,680 $7,680 $0 $4,680 $7,680 9. Participate in Interviews $2,000 $4,000 $1,600 $3,600 $5,600 10. Meet with Selection Committee $3,000 $3,000 $500 $3,000 $3,000 I 1, Prepare Recomnlendation $ 7 , 040 $7,040 $0 $7,040 $ 7 , 040 12, Participate in Final Decision $2,400 $4,800 $500 $2,900 $5,300 TOTAL $4,100 $48,980 $62,380 GRAND TOTAL $53,080 $66,480 Budget assumes that City will assume responsibility of actually printing and mailing RFDQs, 2 Budget assumes that City will assume responsibility for responding to developer requests for any documentation. -, :,..... ;'.. (,~...- "'~'J .. ::.~..".\ "'. . _'" ,.., ," ....t..~.:,:~J ~:~:.;. :"..- '.,~-..). ,,. ':. ":" (",' I....,-.;.::-.."l'.~.....:. :.... .t,~~-..! "'.':",r~';:~^':.'-;:-~ Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Worksession Item #: Meeting Date: 3~ 8.1Cf-9-j Final Agenda Item # SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Extend the contract with Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell and Dunbar, P. A" Tallahassee, Florida, in the estimated amount of $55,000, for state lobbyist services, during the contract period October 1, 1999 through September 30,2000) ~ and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The Pennington Law Firm, was chosen in 1996 to provide state lobbying services. The selection of this firm was based on their response to an RFP. The contract provides for 5 annual renewals at the City's option. The attached letter from Mr.Dunbar addresses the conflict provision in the contract. Essentially, there are two clients of the firm, that pose a potential for conflict. Those clients are the Florida Outdoor Advertising Association and Time Warner. Should a conflict arise the City wi II be notified. The City then has the opportunity to retain someone. else to represent it for that issue and deduct that cost from the fee to be paid to Pennington. As Mr. Dunbar points out in his letter, there is potential conflict in the 2000 session with Time Warner as there is a commission looking at a wide range of cable and telecommunications issues. He is not aware of pending outdoor advertising issues that could cause a conflict. Should an issue arise or legislation be filed that does cause a conflict we will be notified immediately. Should this happen, the Commission will be asked to provide direction regarding whether to retain someone else to represent the City in that matter. User Dept.: Costs Reviewed bY~f t legal rL Budget 11V~% Purchasing @~ (:I) Risk Mgmt 1J/11- Originating Dept.: Info 5rvc Publ ic Works DCM/ACM Other II/A !'I / Ii . Total Current FY Funding Source: CI OP Other Attachments Submitted by: City Manager Printed on recycled paper o None A ro riation Code: 08-[7-'39 IO:23AM FEOM PElHllllGiOtl LAW FIRM TO 271UI2427UI727562408 P002/0G3 3~ PENNlNGTON, MOORE, WILKINSON, BELL & DUNBAR. P ...!\.. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 'AMU~ P. IUill. III tJOUtJlAS S. 81!U KARI!N M. CAMI!CHIS KEVIN X, CROWLEY MARK K. DILIGAL MARC W. DUNBAR PETER M. DUNBAR MARTHA J. I!O~NF1I!LO ROBEllO J. FONTI!LA WILLIAM H, HUGHES. III A. KENNETH ~INE JOHN J, M^TTH.wS EDGAR M. MOORE E. MURRAY MOORE. JR, BRIAN A. NfWMAN JUUUlS t-, f'AAI(II!R III JOHN C, PELHAM CARL R. PENNINGTON, JR.. P,A. C. EDWIN RUDE, JR. GARY A. SHIPMAN CVNTHIA S. TUNN'CL'FF WILLIAM E. WHITNEV BEN H, WILKINSON CATHI C. WILKINSON :216 SOUTH MONROF ~TRfifiT SECOND FlOOR TALLAHASSEe. FLORIDA 32301 (8601 22%.3&33 FAX 10601222.2120 E.MlliI: Ilft.CiJ~tl1nil'lg101lI.wflrm.com REPLY TO: P.O. 80X 10095 "fAUAHASSEE. FL 32302.2095 01" COUN5Cl. JUJ8eAT CINTRON. JR. R. STUART HUFF. P.A, Coral Gablu. Florid. CHRISTOPHER w, KANAGA IAdmlttedl" Ma...chvsatu . elllOt.eo Only 1 BARBARA J. STAROS MEMORANDUM FROM: Ms. Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk City of Clearwater Peter M. Dunbar via Facsimile TO: DATE: August 17, 1999 RE: Conflict Provision -----~----------------~---------------------~--~-~-------~-~-~------ -------------------------------------------------~---------~---~---- As a follow up to our telephone discussion of yesterday, I will briefly summarize the standard conflict provision in the Pennington Firm contract with the City of ClealWater. I would recommend that you review these with the City Attorney before circulating the summary to be sure that our interpretation of the contract provision is consistent with hers. Basically, the Firm has had two clients for several years that have the potential of conflicting with policy positions ofthe City. One is Time Warner <Ind the other is the Florida Outdoor Advertising Association. The contract makes specific disclosure on these two dients and provides that we must notify the City when an apparent conflict arises. The City has the opportunity to retain other professionals to represent it in such circumstances as the Commission deems appropriate. On the two prior occasions where notice has been provided, I believe the City has either felt that it was not appropriate or that The Florida League of Cities provided the necessary presence for the City's purposes. At this time, I am not specifically aware of any pending outdoor issues, although lhE::!Y suriace periodically through the Department of Transportntion's legislative package and through other Initiatives not directly tied to the industry's association. With regard to our second client, Time Warner, I do anticipate significant legislative initiatives during the 2000 Legislative Session and one or more Is likely to be inconsistent with the City's positions in this arena. ;- 08-17-99 lO:23AM FROM PENNINGTON LAW FIRM TO 271~12427~1727562408 P003/003 32- The 1999 Legislature created a special study commission to look a wide range of cable and telecommunications issues prior to next year's session with the intent of recommending specific legislation. As I mentioned to you by phone, Time Warner is one of the private sector interests represented on the study commission. Additionally. both the House and Senate committees having jurisdiction are also preparing legislative initiatives to be considered next year. When the legislation. jf any, is filed in this area, we will notify you immediately as we have In the past. Our primary focos for the City has been in the appropriations process and I assume that this priority will continue as in previous years. Our work in this area has not been affected by our relationship with the other clients and I do not anticipate Gonflicts to arise from either Time Warner or FOAA in the appropriations process at anytime in the future. We have enjoyed our work with the City and we are proud of the successes achieved together. We havo felt that the TimQ Warner and FOAA relationships have not impaired our ability to help the City achieve Its appropriations priorities, but understand if the Commission feels differ~ntly on the matter. PMD/trnz .;,. .~ '.' ~ .. . ..-,. \ ~ . .... A. ' . .. . -". ' AJG-18-:99S 14:54 P.01/1)" \~ 3 . \\~lpY =\- ~tJlf-, Architectural and Construction Engineering Desi~p'E5 TO: Real Estate Developer COMMISSlON ~ AUG 18 1999 " Celebrating His 20th. Year Anniversary us a State of Florida Class A General Contrador" cae 0011468 PRESS CLERK' ATTORNEY -.SHEET o Standard Importance o Moderately Important lZl Extreme Emergency D~: Imrie<! IGfts. bupecto~CommunilY .Respome Tc:lll1l, @ 100 Myrtle e ct~r. Fl. (f~':/)IMG- ~~1..:~~~rtof~~~ 1b~-IKZ c:; ; ,tlPIA1 '7/lM. (4. iI'~ 1 -I Oft1ce &. Fax: 1- (727) - S 17-7070 , ~. To: Jani~c, Faxed you Qn the 11th. and 13th. of Aug., 1999, l'equeiting a lot c:learing re-il\!lpec1iQT1 of my ptoperty at 1350 Gulf Blvd., and ha.ve not receivcd any reply os yet. 1 'Would. still like to have your finalizatjon On rhi$ case in wrili "8- Also, my representative called your office several tirnei, in the past few working days. trying to detcrYnjf1~ who p1a~d th~ signs, on the County R.O. W. in Fro"t of my property stating that my property was ' no public A~ess'. He couldn't SDem to transmit to any of your people that unless rile penon(s) who plac.ed those signs removed them irnmcd.iately~ thc:n he would re1'11()ve them himself. Anyway, the sigm have been Gincc rem()ved and 1.11 future una....thorized eisftS insinuating property owner rol~ and/or reguJatioml will also be removed. PI~a.se make it known to your dept., head that my property is not under she control of anyone but me when it comes to who 1 may allow or not allow to use it. 13S0 Gulf Blvd. has been for many yeans, open to the general public for temporary beach ncces~. The restaurant Iw been using part of my property for overflow porking abo, even though that may be coming to an abrupt end. SOOn albeit not by City interVention 1 can assure you. ,', . . ..::::.:J , f" ,_., " , .,.~' \ . . . . ,.' '!j' .,.. . '. , ' . ' " 1 . ~ - : AUG-18-1993 14:55 r -e- 3 y P.02/07 If and when J c:hfJO.U: to further regulate the property as f8r as trespass is concerned, I'll certainly notifY tbc prop8T authorities on :a case by case basis. In the meantime, you can notify .any person$ tha, wish to place illegal $ipge on or near my property that prosecution will take pJace if/when the perpetrator is found out. Once apin my auoci8\c:, Bob, wu provoked into verbal discord while politely trying tQ communi~"u: with City empJoyees. DunnL1 my OWJ1Cuhip, we ~uld have euily called Of fil~dtcns of thousands of Police and Code ElIforc:ement actions for violation.s for which we were entitled to do as the property owner but instea4 took the f<<Bivins, friendl)' attitude in not doing BO. Site seet's, v~tioners, ( often the handicapped who can't otherwise see the Gulf) the elderly, tile families with children, City visitol'$ pulling water craft or travel trailers through our City and other lest; fottunatc people who have all used the property without my permission were not only left alone just like th= Carte Bl~h Crosenl Beach and Sand Key condominiwn ownC7s., frjen~ renters were never 01l(c run off hut left alone to enjoy the benefits of utilizing my property. Most of the foregoing tens of thousands of people Bob or I could have filed Code Enfarcement Boord "nuisance charges" against or City Police Dept.. Trespassing charges end wor&e yety left these people with negative attitude, 4"d memories much less fond oflhe" One city~ One Fut~" experience. Not only would the above have unnecessarily acated A windfall burden on our Polige and Code 'Enforcement rc50ur~ the toe! alone would have been astronomical. If your thinking fence.t;., si8n&~ or other forma of mea.urcs to (fcny these people ~CC$S would havo created a solution. your grossly mistaken. The City an top of cvcrythins else would be proceuing property damaac claims for the routine distraction of any fonn of blockade that would have beeD installed to prevent most of ihose violators who would boldly do as they please to g~t access to the property. . The foregoing has been addressing the vehieular types of Ktivlly and doesn't ~Tatc;h the s~~ of the daily c<m,tant flow of pedestrian uaffic who for S years when I didn't have a Beach walked North and South non-stop with no right whatsoever to ~ceS$ the steps next to the: (CTesmt Beach) City pedestrian crossover ramp to ~esa the Beach to the North. HrAd I banicaoed my property completely, they would have been fortlcd to jump into the wate-r or walk back to Gulf Blvd. to j~t around my property puttins your bare foot Beach pedestrian on 0. 300 ftlong nip on Dervish Bros- greasy, hot" bunting asphalt and then cross my property along Oulf Blvd. and back 3001 to reacb the partially constnccted. crcstiover referenc;ed above ( the rump rebuilt nom my property by City mmintcnance wOlken without permits nwncrous times who themselves commented they didn't understand why they were DeVer allowed to rebuild it properly 50 it would not keep washing away).. Dispi~ all of the fon=going time. money, and RSpeCt We have contributed to the City and it's propcdy owners and vj3jtors~ It's appanine we continue to be prejudic:ed again$l down to our solicitation of a 'lmple requCS1. Once:: again plca8C r~ond. ~"'e " '...p""'" for the MQYOf'~ e'gnature~ ee; City <:<>rn~III'I~n Due dClte, lq~ Thank You, Glen JohnaonlBob Gorges 13.50 Gulf Blvd. Clearwater, Fl. ...." ... ,.. .~. . , ' , . '. ., , ..' .'. \'" . \ ." < , .... "', "'. ' ;,. ..,' . . Preliminary Agenda (W orksession) o / rg~ " ", ' ..... \' \,~:'.: '>,' '.., ..... . . .... ::-,...., H '.~" " ".. . '0" .... ...... .":..'\ '. ;,' ..~"..,:. '..' . ' .' . ...... .' . -. . '. v . ,. .~ ~_'~ I.' ,~. ' . ~~....~ . PRELIMINARY AGENDA Clearwater City Commission Worksession - 9:00 A.M. - Monday, August 16, 1999 Service Awards Convene as Community Redevelopment Agency ,eRA): 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes: special meeting 6/3/99 3. Direction requested regarding DDB's request to be relieved of remaining $117,723.22 reimbursement contained in the 1983 participation agreement for acquisition of the Atrium property 4. Approve Fiscal Year 1998-99 third quarter amended eRA budget; authorize appropriation of entire balance remaining in eRA Trust Fund as of 9/30/99 to Miscellaneous Redevelopment Project Fund 5. Approve amended Interlocal Agreement for eRA management of DDB in exchange for $39,755 for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 6. Executive Director (Assistant City Manager) Verbal Reports 7. Other Business 8. Adjourn Convene as Pension Trustees: 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes: 7/12/99 3. Request for acceptance into membership: Theresa McNeela, Edward Hartman, Daniel Harrison, Earl Ashley, Elizabeth Lancara, Lori Metzner, George Banores, Antoinette DeLuca, Sylvia Walls, Eric Jenkins, Luther Mack, Robert Mock, Mark Crellin, John Waldman, Lisa Authier, Chance Anderson & Matthew Johnson 4. Regular Pensions to be granted: Duane E. Smith 5. Pensions to be vested: Nancy Yankus 6. Waive Vested Pension: Lori Metzner 7. Approve recommended administrative expenditure budget for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 totaling $127,088 for City of Clearwater Employees' Pension Plan 8. Approve increase in amount authorized to be spent with PriceWaterhouseCooper, LLP for actuary & other related services by $15,000 for total of $120,000 for 3 year period ending 12/31/2001 9. Accept Actuary's Report for Employees' Pension Plan for plan year beginning 1/1/99 10. Approve Legal Services Agreement with Christiansen & Dehner, P.A., for pension attorney services 11. Other Business 'j 2. Adjourn Reconvene Work session PRESENTATIONS 1 . Memorial Causeway Bridge Design - Aesthetic Considerations PUR PURCHASING Central Parking Systems, extension, month to month parking system services at Clearwater Beach, ending 9/30/2000, est. $325,000 (PW) Volt Sciences, Inc" extension, installation of gas mains & services at various locations throughout gas system, 9/30/99-12/31/99, funding was approved 9/17/98 (GAS) 8/16/99 1 ~. ,T'~ ," . ..' ':'~., ,.: ,'~l~' ~ ". ,~~ . ," ,\ .".. "'\' .' ,t,J,~' "',.' ':.. .'.... ,;. '.' . ,'" ~-.'. ',~,.. ',' . ,,:Y:.,' ~. . ".1: ~/.r~,,: ".:." Pinellas County Solid Waste Management Department, solid waste disposal used by Parks and Recreation, 8/20/99-9/30/2000, est. $26,000 (QOL) Jimmie's Wrecker Service, 2nd & Final extension, towing services, 11/1 /99-1 0/31 /2000, est. $55,000 (GSS) Genuine Parts Company, first extension, motor vehicle equipment parts & services, 8/22/99- 9/21/2000, est. $850,000 (GSS) Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell and Dunbar, P.A., 3rd of 5 extensions, state lobbyist services, 10/1/99-9/30/2000, est. $ 55,000 (CLK) ED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 . Bluff RFQ Update 2. Interlocal Agreement with Pinellas County for joint management of an Economic Analysis for north central portion of City, commonly referred to as Hercules Industrial Area, $1 2,500 (Consent) HM HUMAN RELATIONS 1. Approve recommendations of Technical Review Committee for allocation of Fiscal Year 1999- 2000 City of Clearwater Social Services Grants Program funds in the amount $65,000; approve proposed funding contract form MR MARINE 1. Amendment to Waiver Agreement with Charles and Ypapanti Alexiou, property owners at 7 Rockaway Street, and National Water Sports Inc., to add a tow ride which seats 5 people (Consent) PO POLICE 1. Authorize City Manager to ienew one-year agreement with Pinellas County Sheriff's Department to provide latent fingerprint examination and related services, as well as crime scene services including evidence and property storage, 10/1/99-9/30/2000, for $373,712.30 2. Addendum to Agreement with School Board of Pinellas County, continuation of School Resource Officer program for 1999-2000 school year at Clearwater High School & Countryside High School (Consent) 3. Lease Agreement with RSGN, Inc. as Lessor, for premises located at 1217A N. Ft. Harrison Ave., (Old Clearwater Bay police substation) 10/1/99-9/30/2002, at annual rental of $ 7,260 (Consent) PW PUBLIC WORKS 1. Contract for Gulf to Bay Blvd. median landscaping & irrigation (Old Coachman Rd. to Belcher Rd. & westward) to Morelli Landscaping, Inc., $110,087.18 with option to continue with Phase 2 of project for not to exceed $85,877.82, for total of $195,965 for both phases (Consent) 2. Work Order with McKim & Creed for engineering services re Disinfection Facility Design - Northeast APC Facility, $119,000 (Consent) 3. Approve selection committee's ranking of consultants (#1 - Parsons Engineering Science, #2 - Harvard Jlly Clees Toppe Architects, #3 - Tampa Bay Engineering, #4 - Camp, Dresser & Mckee, #5 - Bitterli & Associates Architects, and #6 - McKim and Creed) for more detailed engineering and financial analyses for two beach parking garages; authorize staff to negotiate a scope of services and contract with top ranked firm (Consent) 8/16/99 2 }~ta;)i;f: :;,~~;.;(+ iSF:iii,.t..~p,:;}':::,i:;'~;' 'r:'::. ...... .{.-.{';. i;~;,:..:~;':;i.?);' '~rii'l/;~/i';~~);;;{~~C:;:.;.;.~;t:~~{;;:1i~~'{i '(-~t '. . .."'.I', ~" ".W, " .'-~ ',' ',' .~~". ~~ ,,' . ,',. .',,' ,'. ,. ".,',' ':," " l:~ "', ".,: <':', ..', ,,:,",:~ '~,.,:..':~ ',I 4. Amend project scope for Drew Street Widening project; approve transfer of $550,000 from S.R.60 Corridor Enhancement capital project to Drew Street Widening capital project (Consent) PLD PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6429-99. #6430-99 & #6431-99 - Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Suburban & LOR Zoning for property located at 2892 Union St" Sec. 32-28-16, M&B 43,06 (Larry & Marcella Wing (A99-11) 2. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #6432-99, #6433-99 & #6434-99 - Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban & LMDR Zoning for property located at 2854 Saint John Dr., Virginia Groves Terrace 5th Add., Blk C, Lot 13 (Russell & Sydney Jacobs (A99-1 2) 3. Public Hearing - proposed amendments to Clearwater Comprehensive Plan; approve sending to appropriate reviewing agencies CM ADMINISTRATION 1. First Amendment to Harborview Center Management Agreement, extending term with Globe Facilities Services, Inc., for 10/1/99-9/30/2002 (Consent) CA LEGAL DEPARTMENT Second Reading Ordinances 1. Ord. #6417-99 - Amendments to various sections of the Community Development Code 2. Ord. #6437-99 - Relating to Public Beaches; amending Sec. 22.21 to amend definition of "safe Bathing Limit" and to include definitions of "Public Beach" and "Sand Key Public Beach"; amending various other sections in Ch. 22 3. Ord_ #6438-99 - Relating to fines for illegally parking in a parking space designated for persons who have disabilities; amending Sec. 30.061 (7) to increase the penalty for violation of disabled permit only parking Resolutions 1. Public Hearing - Res. #99-38 - Relating to Community Revitalization; designating that portion of Clearwater Beach bounded by Mandalay on the East, the Mean High Water line on the West, Baymant to the North and Papaya to the South, as a City of Clearwater Revitalization / Redevelopment Area OTHER CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS 1. Authorization for Settlement - Charles and Gloria Johnson v. City of Clearwater City Manager Verbal Reports Commission Discussion Items 1. Fire Task Force Presentation(s) for Thursday Night 1. Representative Leslie Waters - Legislative Report 2. Recognize Leadership Group Other Commission Action 1. Confirm 9/9/99, 10:30 a.m, to 1 :30 p.m. to begin review of policies & Rules of Procedures Adjourn 8/16/99 3 I . '. '." ", . . ...:..., ~ . \ '. . 't ," r:- ......~.;.. . .' ;.. ":,~. ..... note: C & Pension Trustees agenda packs kept separately. 1!J/9cJ '. .' . ... . '#.' :., ..... " < ". ,. . .-. . . i' .' . . I . .... . \ ' " '- , r-.----------. , I i '---I J ~'-I~:~~' t~Q~--ij. 10.5' I 1 ~:J - ~: j ..tit ~ ~ ii !.~ e ~ ~ I :.t'f\ ..:..___ _____ _____._______ __________ __ _____ ._ __ _ ___ _'. _~. _ I} .. _. _ ___.__ ___ __ _ _ __.. _. __ __ _ __ .... __ .. __ _ . __ _.. ' _ .' _ . __ .. 1 , ~ ." '. , .,... : 4. '. ',', ... ," ", ~:\...;.{..;::--;: T Exi$dn-~aridge'.. '" "'::~.~)~: . .j'. .": . ~ "'..~ : .. .\..... ..'1....:.~~.... . " ,;::;,\:,>,,::,:,\;'~/~';.'::\:. '..\' . '. j", '. - I :-,',. . . '. ~ ,. f;' .:,,',;. '1.' ~ ' 1--- i I Pre<:-;. i- ~~\.. ~~R" .~:~!:..:~~.~~~:-;~ . . -', . : 'i. ,. . .' . ..',,, " ~ 'I" ~ . . , ... .' . i .. .', .'. . .' . .'. > ' j...v 1 ...l r J -J .- J r" ..::...;::. ::.J ....J . . . , ; i !')~J.!:J 'J 'J~j Y iJ~J::JJ.c; Ii !J~J!:J ~/j~jY H -1 , OJ i . '~r .. ~. '. ~/ . ',' . , , ',. , . . ~ , . . . ~ .... ' . ,. J '. t ~ .... .. '..... " I , .. . ," (, - ; f' . :..~<.~ ..I'.............~ _..' .J"~-"".- , .: . ~.. . '. ~ ',. . " . .. ~, '-', '. '; : .... . I .',' . ~ t t', ~..~. ' ,. ~ ' " . . I I I I I , I ~. '. , . ...I ~ ~J 1J J J J ::.) .:.,. V.." I ", ~"'. ""J. '1~"',;~,.t... '/ .,..~.t:i~'.J;L'''; "'lJll~'7,('.i'" .. '.:~f~i~1/, "J;.' , ~_. .. ,./ .// /'(' /' ,}~~:t!: ... ~ ' . ' . , . '., I-I ,: \~I.' '''''-' '.! .;. - fJ" . . r )'V~ _!.. ~ - C::;;;' Ideas that may work from the sketch pad of . . . John O'Neil 1/~7-'~''7lYaMa- 'If 2... tt~11 weill*" . . . , " 1 " 1G " " " ,~ 30 " 34 36 . ,--'---!- -}..~ '''-'IJ--- 'II ---~~_.. --r--'- ,'--- --' -..]'~;: L. ....... . - -.. 'I I I. V)~\ 1- y- ~n ill :.- I 9 - 1 -- -- - -:-- -- -- -r - - ~- -lk{;-- - -l-rl1--- -: i u - -1~" - j -- --- -., --- --:- -- r" T'~\l\f . 11111 I I' - I ~ i- -:...~. I .. . I -..-.1,1\\ --e- - ~ - -Tl -'-:-rT:o.:-- . ,-- I .1. , -~- -- -~ -:-'1- --- -. --- _.. -' n, - k,..~'- -II - ~.p--r-r - I .. .-" ~~-- ' i . -:.---. ,----~----. ,.- ~:S~~~I-I--I-L-I-Ia~-- I-~,..' I , , - --1-. ~ : --., -,..t---~- _,J_... . 1 : I ;:;1"1' ,.. ~I ; I ( ~~ 1 '-&)"'/j';7M~--Z;v,;q~'C?~f-- ~~)-r - ',- - --, - _.J,' .- 1"-"'" CJ\ --"... -- -. '-0 T ' .- '1- . i ~ po I - . n: - - .' -[': .._u_. ~ l .--'-' i . I ... I ,. ~ ~ N-- ~ I~ -~IR ~ 1 . -- -~.-~-.-+~Ir?i 1', ,- -1-1-11~- -1.- - -. - -~ --k-t -- i-~I ~ ~ -f--l~~ " llo'1-1-- ~--I-~- . ---....~-~-~[-~-~? -~!--,~~.. ~ 1 - - - - -- ---- -- .1, : t~ \--;~I. - ,. -I. I . - , ~ ~- "'~I~-~'s: :lOl, ~~ -~- - -~,..:.-:.- .:.-' .:- -:--- - -,,' !\~l-f~ - -i: I~- -:l ~-~~-~-~i -~~~ f1' --- . ..--......---- --. '~.'1h " "'--'i-\-"-'~~--- --~-~-ti-!~-~-~~-~i-)a; ~~ . . /~ . .' ~i ~ ~~ ~ I.' ~\.I \ ~ - -~'--I --- -~'~-~-~I" ~- 1.~ -~-~~..~~ 1 -~._.__._----~_._-,_.__.. - -(t,- '~~ 1,1:/:'.' -.. -. . --~.1 -~ .-- s '~'~l - .- ~-\.I C1J(\ Iii . -.. . . ~ . \ JL ., J' N I ) I~ q~, ~ I~ ~ I ~ ~~. \ t1\ I I ~ ~ ~1l) ~ ~ I n 1:-"0 . . ~ -- "-l'~ -- -~ . '~:. .::. \\ -, - _~,__U j-- - ~ - ._.~_.~ -~~-QI- ~<<\ _.~, ~~ ~ ~ __.. -.fj\ ~~ ~\ - __~l i__ ___/<:.;_') ~-~-j~--~--cb.~ -.lt~I,,,-l ~. .' .. u . 1 .,1.. f ' ~ ~ ~ . , ~,.J ~ K' , I. ~ .' I f) I . ~,' C<\,. ) ~ -f_. ~ -- --+----~r-f- i-' "~. -. - . -~I'--i---' r-- I-~t-~t~- .,-~~ _.~ ~~.. .~, , I "I ~I:, t: ~~ \ \: ~ I ~ I~ "] \1\ rt, j ~ -~- "-1,,' --------...,.1 . '~r t. -~ ~-~ -~ ", -{\b ~-~-~~,.~, ,':~, . ~~ . , "~I'! ' ; .. ~ . ' .....1 )1' ~ Otr ~'''''I~ ~ - ","I-f--~- ._~--_.-f- - -.- -=--~--- ~~~ ~i! j \1~ -'<' - i~" \~u"" ~ -~j~---~-~--- ,'-- ~f ~ .. .~ ' .~..... I'\.. , t' f'L I "t- + '. '("'. . l\ ~ '~ ~ h.. _~ , "". ~ \P " ,. I" ., I ~'I~!\ ~ "" -- -, -- - . -, ~ -:.A .. '" . . . ~ t .. .~.. ..j ~ I-::'~ ~ ..:.. -;-').~. '" ,,_.. - I~ - -") ,. 1 ~ . . I"" '"""'-" " . ~ '\. .. ,-,.. .",.-;-. J. I~. ~ . ~ I 11 I ~ : . IT-~':~r-)~ ~ ~,:~.;:: ~ 1'1-- '1~-'- =-~,i-!~~=~'~=~r. r! r -- --~ -.. .1---- ...- ..'~ ~lr~~ ~~ttJ.[;r-~~_ -: II - \1 ~ I;' ~, ~.. .,~~ ,I ~ i ~ , --- . .,1. __ _ _ '- '\ --1- I . 'T-T''-'~ I.. I ~l. 11\ . J~~I Ii ~.: ~ . +~._----.+- .1'. . ~ ~LJ1~ :jl, -+~ \? l'Yi . .,. 1-; ---~L.~I-- -~I i ~ . ~ ' 1-.. - --- . _.. . ~ ; ~ l\- ~ +1 -Ii ", ~ A ~-- ~ " ,I I f\1 ~ ~~! Lh f',. . ! I If t I Ii:' j': ",I'! ~ 11 I l'). I' I i~ :\, ~ . -- c-:- --- .. . .. , .,' f' ~ ~ I' ~ It ~ [ i,' Ii ~;~...~ I ;~ i ~ j ..m -- - --- ---.. I.. .... } ~r'l ~'rT -11'.' . ~L I -~ -.~ . I '~I ~ !. I I~. r ~ ! -- ;. ~ It) ~ . I ~ J . ...:- ":- .-:- -or -:--:-- - " . . . . - I. ..~: ~ 1 . T $' .. .~_. - ~ " .-.. ..~ '1~1 g, ::=j..' ,-----:Ii;..--. -.,.-- ..... -- -..... -l~- {.I.~ .1., :~~.._!LJ ":'l~:=-=~:' .!~) I ~' . . , " I ... I . " I r ~ ,tl t Y\ ~ ....; --2 . 6 ;.-- 10 -12'--'4'- ._,._--:-,8-,1.....20.... 22 ...;; ---"-i6"'-'28-"~-30 ~2""-")'" ~J Date: Page: Ii" .u:;'.o: ,...$.....#.;: ~ J~~# ':1't".: '.;:: ti ,_ ~'~1 \:".!:,{i;.. f->-:~..: ~''':'-:: ..... ~... ; ~f.:~. ,:. _~.J ,..I,.. I jlfJtf.{4~,,~ r ~i:(.~ (;-: ..>>' :";1.;:. ,:~ ~ -J I ~ I - I ' I I . Y i '''''-111-' I I ' '~ ' , i I . . -- ...-. ~- .- -\1' !, r - "1'--, 1-- ,__I -- -~t- -'l~-t--- --:J::;~ -~~tl-- ,I .. ------i-:----...---------.-.-- -.\\!..- p- ,- ,-- '-'- --r---~----- -------.--.- ~ . -.-- --- ~ --.. ._- -.. - --- --. -. , - ~ ~f ~~~--- . L.t~~~-I-T" --I -- L .::.+--:~i.--'-" i · . --:- - .-.- .-:-- --- ..- -~. ..--, , -. l-=~~~ ~r-I- \--1'+ 1-+ --:;... J-.,.,.- II - -~I- - II : 'I ;; '~~7)~-:~~.,- ~ I :,' --.l------.-----..,---~t---l-- .. - <i!") 1'.1: 71'':::- -- W'."1c. ~Af - -::,:V]rl- T - 'I' I - 1-- -- IJ 0\ - I' - ...~ - - ----,,,.. -- -~- : :. .. ~: --. - - - -~ 11. - ... ~. -. I ., I I ~ !<' - :i"- ~-- ~ -~. ~ I. - - -:- --:-- - ,-- --------- ~ -~11'ii \ 1\ r -1-1--1-1 ~u ,- -:- - --I~:;' --- k~- --~ - oJ ~ ~ - - . ~~~~,I '-'l'-l- t--- ~ -- 1-- . -r~-~-~~-~-~- -~-~I~" I .~ --- -- ---,-.- .---..---..- ,1-- -. . . -n,'t- -~:: _ _1- - -- - d_ .. I r::L..~__ ~ _~.__'" _~ i'Ii~ ~~ . , . . . I\T. . ~ ~s . ~ n jlb I~ ~ _ __ _' ,. . . ~ ~i~ ' iT lit. I, ~ ",1'1 LX :> ~ ~~ ~ ! -- : ---- -- ---- .--- -. :ili" ,i ; .~.; fl'1-, I-~='~- :-- --~~-~ -~~~- "~-:~-~-')~' ib~ . ~ '01 ,,' " ':, - 1- -~ --- --- - -- 0 --c::s: -..'~ _I~- - _.:~_u_.~~. .~, ~ --------.~_._~____L-I -----. : _.. "-Ct.- 1ql~~' \I:~ .\ ._---. ~: I _~ .., .~_.~ __f'.. ,~_~ ~~ IG)~ ., . -, . . ~ \.. .\~t,,' ' ' ~ I ) it) C't ~ ~ ~ ------ - ; --- fh --------~~ ,\-,..~'t-~~'-+- -.-.:d--_!_- -~\" -~~-i~:~_,~-e-~-'~I,..~~J ~ o 0 C"r, . ~ ...\.~-\\ I ~ I """ ~_f 'l\ ~. ~I~ <:) _ ., , Io..~ ._ _ . '-.~ '\ ' ", iT ,_.... - - -rll.-T- ..,,- ~-i '~-4 - l~- P!I.- Cb-~ -,:. - ~ '-J -- - ~ , ,- 1 ~l~' I ",', ~ t-.; ~ ~ s ,'" 0,1...1 ~ '-' . \. i ,- : : I ~ 'I" t,~ ~ q, .) , ~ , ~ -- -~ - -~ ..",:, 1:. - - -- ___,Q_.L~_ --' I~-~]-----I-~.Cl-~,,~~. "1b , "\ Cti ~ ,- ~I ~ \ - \ ~ I ~ ~ I ~, , . " ~ ' , --,j i' \ ' , \ " ~ b rr "''' ')' ~ ,~ ;-... , -- -- -- --~ \~... ~I :~ -~ -~--", .. 1\' ~ ~. Cli-~f"\ -~ ~ : ~ " , '......: . ~ 'I~' i\.."; :-1" ):'.. 'J ,~,,' ~.Cb ~ ~~ ~ ,"~ ' '" '-.. -- -- - ; N':'! It :;:: -, . ~ - - ~ -~IQC - ~~ -l---",rr," --~ . '~I -~ ~ ". :- --- ~- ..-~ ~- -:- ~~~ < '~.~; ~,!~~ tfm - - ()- - 1- - -~P" -- e'.~ --..-- b---" ~ 2. . -.- -- --. .~~ '-=- --:.:;. __.:l, .. . -0 ..~ t,".- --- ~.I" ~.. ~ -'- -7 .. 1-- -... ~ - ... r( .. ~;~.. ._- ~~ .." ~ . ,,, ." '''~, i " " <... ~:'? -r- -:'~' ,;l.! ~ ~ ~ ~ .~. ~ N ~ _. " "~~ ~ . ~ I, ~:~J~..:;' (,t~l! l~f ,. -~ ci;~I":)---~2' - , ~ ~J- '-' -I . ~ I . I ~ I ~ . -+-:k-r-1 --~ \ f~)---~~~,--- r'. -;~ ~, -.- --:-'- --- : - -- -.- -~-!II~ ~I- ~1' ~~1[; ~ C-- -:. .. - , ~. - \', I ~ ' ~ ~~~ - ~ ~, ------ --1'-- .----- p,--, --, --r 11~ oj. ~"j ',\~ - ,.-.r= -;"': . - ~-'--I""'-"'~~ ~, ~ J t--- - - ..- -' .. , : -- ~ ~ +~, ~ ~ ..} i :~~-- ~I :. I; I ~ ;~ - ~ I D-.! ~ . ' I I r. t I I; "I r: : '-\" ~ li If);, ': ,~ 1, ~ - ~.~ -;- -....- .. - ;. I ~ '*~i ' ,': ~ ~ it ~: i; ~I!~' "% 1 - ~ ~ __~_.__'_ _~~', ~----- --- -- ;f~t-l-~ -~-r--, '-r~---~--i--~- ~' : , ' : - . -:-" _:- - 1-- -j- -- P~li': -; ;,~" rip -l- · f- f ~~.:-I--I~ ~, , , . .' i. ~-.-T-,,--I--,~~ '-,.__=, i:- C~ .~ l~;:-: ~t-:t,:L!. ,: -'!~-ii-'~~-<t,-:qr-~.. IF A /V~ C.Avf"c~".q'7 /1' PdT dVltl: dt)l'pJ<Z.~W.6~C:- I ~,tI~) lic~ (JNf, t-- .11\ tctlxtl:J 1'j)l,N -r/II/ .A-1/OU?'N1) ~m.,t,.1' .I"~ J"'t:j t) I '/N~c-""R. - I ~ IFA uew ~ vS"C=-tv..AY /S' 6u/C/ t:J& J)/lA-Whlllt/rt:?"- etJ l/td 6crc-cl~GI~ "'i. ~ tvAy ,;IVVb A hrh//VJ I'/c~. Tfit?' S'A,I'J~~ ;t:J12e:-14'f ~(J{)c.tl6G" j?l"lilk.s LAL/ WCJ/<~ CXCc~/ DI2'-:::::>(;./#3 ~A/ BE P::7#c-'r" )cM.r:M Dl2y ~L '!"~ ---, 'J Date: Page: 2 4 II ,. 20 22 24 .-..- ..-- .....-- .--. 32 14 16 28 30 )4 . --rl- - ... I I .. . -.. N -- -- -- .. -.J_ .:.. -i-~n ~-- f . ,.._ _'" ---J---- -__ . - .-j- . .()):___1i._. 0, ~ i . I .. ." I : T:~-- . - Q; I I~ .. .- I ~ ~ . \Jo,J - ! ~._~- I -~ ~.~. \.t\I -'U _ I . - .-- -. --I..... ..- -.. --.. I .. I - .... ...._. _..._ - e. , - '..1 :. I I I I 1 II -.- ...- --. .... --- .- r I" I I I : , I 1-. L. ... _'_'__ ' _ _.1 2& ~2 34 I I . i . I' ! i . ! ,-.. ....- -- . ,.-- . "1-' . , ' . I II I I I ._.' .:--..-'= .--"I-'.j~~~~~=.~':J. ., 26 211 30 32 o 2 .- . - ..- --.. ----- - 4 II 14 -... --- 115 111 21j ... es: I --. 1 ... I 2 24 " ',L ff~ ,. , ~~ ~ . ~., ,.-. .4 ., " .. '\..' :\':.' ..' ..,~.. .... '.:~. '~".."'.,-.'. ': ':~'::J'" ~ Clearwater u ~D1- One City. One Future. City of Clearwater Inter-Office Communication To: Mayor & Commissioners Cc: Mike Roberto Bill Horne From: Bob Keller Date: August 9, 1999 Subject: Bluff RFDQ Attached is a draft of the Request for Developer Qualifications (RFOQ) that will be used to solicit interest in the development in and around the Bluff. We welcome your insights, suggestions and Comments. In addition we want to discuss with you the possibility of utilizing Charles Siemon as a leader/advisor on the RFDQ. Mr. Siemon's expertise and perspective would provide an invaluable addition to the staff work on the project. If you would consider this assistance through an amendment to his contract, we would utilize his services through the ranking of the respondents. As a separate issue, we would ask the Commission to employ Mr. Siemon to lead the negotiations with the selected developer. The following are some of the highlights of the RFDQ document, which was prepared by Charlie Siemon and reviewed by appropriate staff: The geography will be: Between Cleveland and Drew; Ft. Harrison and Clearwater Harbor. Cleveland to Pierce; Osceola to Clearwater Harbor. A two-step process is outlined: 1. The first is a traditional RFQ that requires interested parties to submit appropriate material demonstrating financial and development capability to accomplish the development. At this stage the proposers must indicate land use, intensity and development approach. After analysis and management recommendations, the Commission will make the tinal ranking determination. 2. Management will commence negotiations toward a public/private partnership agreement with the #1 ranked proposer with a deadline of 180 days with one 90-day extension possible. If an impasse ;s reached with the #1 proposer, negotiations will move to the #2 candidate. The partnership agreement will be a very complete document, subject to Commission approval. !, - '.' . . . .... . . '" . I. ", . .tr . .' , ':,.',. . '. '. .. ~.... _' '.... ..., _'. The goals for the development are: · Catalyst for development and redevelopment of Downtown · Creation of a destination for City residents and the region · Design that creates a landmark · Fiscal benefit for the City. The proposers are not limited to any particular uses; but the document outlines management's sense of the community priorities for development in the project area. Integration of the Main Library is suggested for inclusion, Likewise, proposers may submit a development scheme for all or part of the project area, The RFDQ attempts to balance the City's need for adequate information with a concern for potential proposers' reluctance to submit detailed project plans at the early stages of negotiations. This approach is common in developments of this magnitude and most often results in detailed plans that reflect both the expertise and experience and the special insights of the local community. The document makes provision for a pre-bid meeting to provide additional detail on the project and to give potential proposers and opportunity to ask questions. The RFOQ articulates that referendum(s) may be required to accomplish the development. . I; . -, ~',.,". . . . ..._ ~_' . . r ,~..... '. '. ~. , . ',. ' II . , .: " DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Request for Developer Qualifications for the Selection of a "Master Developer" for an area designated as the "Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property" in the City of Clearwater RFDQ Number: 99-99 Release Date: ----------- ----, 1999 Final Submission Date: ---------- ----, 1999 at 4:00 p.rn, "r . ~1..' . '. ~ . ~ ~'. ..' ,.-.- .,: .,,'.:~ . -. --. .~.;:. ~', --'~..\ ,'" . ~ .' _', il~; :~ ~.~ -_t.1;,: ~ ~~.~~l'. ':'~'. \'.~. ,It ".~4"'~ -'"1 :.:- -.;';' ':;'l'-';. '~:...,:. . t':. .; ; ,t \.:.... .::....~: ../~t;~",t(": ':;.~....:::.' .~,~ t.......: /.. ":::. >.,; .... ~'_' t. ...,..'r': .~. ':H~'\. -.:: t.:,,~ ~.I~'.~'~': ."" ;~ DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR DEVELOPER QUALIFICATIONS City of Clearwater, Florida The City of Clearwater, Florida ("City") invites interested, qualified parties to submit Statements of Qualifications to serve as a Master Developer for the redevelopment of all or a portion of approximately 28.52 acres of property generally known as the "Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property", The Redevelopment Property is generally located on the west side of Downtown Clearwater between Pierce Street on the south and Drew Street on the north. Statements of Qualifications must be submitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Request for Developer Qualifications. Requests for additional information in regard to the Request for Qualifications may be submitted in writing to the Purchasing Manager, City of Clearwater, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748, (727) 562-4634 on or before ----, 1999. Written responses to such requests for additional information shall be distributed at the pre-submission conference and by mail to all parties to whom the original Request for Developer Qualifications was distributed as well as to any parties which have requested in writing that the City include their name on the distribution list for the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property Request for Developer Qualifications, The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property Request for Developer Qualifications sets forth relevant information regarding the property being offered for development, the City's goals with respect to the development of this site, and the process for developer selection, The City will hold a pre-submission conference at the City of Clearwater City Commission Chambers at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 on ------, 1999, at 4:00 p,m. Interested parties will be given the opportunity to ask questions of City representatives concerning the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property, the City's goals with respect to the development of the project, submission requirements and the selection procedure. An original and eleven (11) copies of the Statement of Qualifications in an 8-1/2 II x 1111 format must be sealed and delivered to the office of the Purchasing Manager, City of Clearwater, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 on or before -------, --- -, 1999, at 4:00 p.m. Each submittal shall be marked on the outside in bold letters as follows: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS, CITY OF CLEARWATER, RFDQ No. 99- 99, DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY. Immediately after 4:00 p,m., all of the Statements of Qualifications which are received will be publicly opened and forwarded to the Office of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater for review and evaluation. A short list of three (3) or more qualified developers will be selected by the City for interviews. After the interviews, the qualified developers will be ranked and .' '. I, l " . ,',' 'f .., ~'. , ,. '. . " ' - . \' '. " ... .. ,', . ~ . . . ' '.r . , DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT submitted to the City Commission for selection as the Master Developer for the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property. The City reserves the right to accept any Statement of Qualifications deemed to be in the best interest of the City, to waive any irregularities in any Statement, or to reject any and/or all Statement and to re-advertise for new Statements of Qualifications. In evaluating each Statement, the City will consider, but not be limited to, the proposer's experience, qualifications and capabilities, the proposer's financial qualifications and strength, the terms and conditions offered for acquisition of the property, the market and economic viability of the proposed project concept and the appropriateness of the proposed uses and design relative to the immediate area and the City of Clearwater. Michael Roberto City Manager City of Clearwater ~: ~! ~v" ~t::' II':' ,"~ '"' ~.... ......,,~. !~7" ~ I ":':rf'l~~ :.:: ". .\-:::t...~...... '. (.~ t' ,~ . ~,"... ,;' :.:.';~_ t "..~" ... :" ":l~. ,j. I,~. ~~I:,~. '}; t ,:.:. .. ,," \' , I'~' ;. ~,"~ \ : ,...,/., .; t~'~ .~.. *~:~..: :"~. , ...'l t.....~:!. ;-:~'f I ~:. _'. '.. .;~~ '." .~:: ;~. J..: ,':.: ~ ~ . ': . .: : _, '; : ::. . "';}:..-:- .;' '0. 0 .". ;, ~. :'0.' DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DISPOSITION PROGRAM The Project: The City of Clearwater ("City") hereby extends an invitation to qualified developers to submit Statements of Qualifications to serle as Master Developer for the redevelopment of all or a portion of approximately 28.52 acres of land known as the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property in the City of Clearwater (lICity") (see Appendix A to the Request for Qualifications). A significant portion of the property is owned by the City of Clearwater and is proposed to be conveyed to a Master Developer on appropriate terms and conditions. The City is willing to assist in the acq uisition of the privately owned portions of the Redevelopment Property, if necessary, to carry out the redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property. The disposition of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property will be accomplished by way of a two- step selection process involving this Request for Developer Qualifications and ranking of qualified developers and the negotiation of a Public/Private Redevelopment Partnership Agreement providing for the redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property. Approximately --- acres of land within the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property is currently owned by the City of Clearwater ("City") and is being made available for disposition by the City for community redevelopment purposes on terms and conditions to be negotiated. In addition, depending on the nature of "the redevelopment, a public referendum on the disposition of certain lands within the boundaries of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property may be required. The Property: The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property is located at the western edge of Downtown Clearwater along Clearwater Bay to the north and south of Cleveland Street, Clearwater's traditional main street. The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property is comprised of publicly and privately owned lands located between Fort Harrison and Clearwater Bay, between Drew Street on the north and Cleveland Street on the south, publicly and privately owned lands located between Osceola Avenue and Clearwater Bay, between Cleveland Street on the north and Pierce Street on the south, together with all public rights of way within the Redevelopment Property boundaries, The City-owned property is currently used for park, library, conference center, city hall, roads and public parking purposes, Publicly owned lands are designated on Appendix B to the Request for Qualifications. The property is currently designated as commercial-industrial, commercial- retail/institutional in the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater and is currently zoned as Downtown, The City is prepared to amend its land development regulations, if necessary, to promote the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property. City's Redevelopment Goals: The City has not established a specific list of uses for the development of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property. However, the City ''"', ',' 'I..... .~..~:.:~. " .'......: /:.,~,... ...,.,.:.. :}',.,"";'; ::,".::", '.' .',.,.';';';:__., "(,~'",,",,,,,,.,_~,_",':"::~.':.!.,..'~J~'''. ,'-.:,.f'.,;:" .... :.":: ~.... . ;:.i' .'.~. .',':~. DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT has identified a series of goals desired for the redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property. Those goals include: Catalyst for Revitalization of Downtown Clearwater. The redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should be a catalyst for development and redevelopment in Downtown Clearwater. Destination and Community Focal Point. The redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should serve as a cultural, civic and economic focal point for the community and a regional destination as a place of social, cultural, economic and residential character in order to enhance Clearwater's quality of life. Linkages and Connections. The redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should be designed so that the development forms physical and visual linkages and connections with adjacent areas and neighborhoods in and outside of the traditional downtown. Design Quality. The redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should be designed with "landmark" visual qualities befitting the strategic location and character of the Property, Fiscal Benefit to the City, The development of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should be fiscally beneficial to the City of Clearwater. Disposition Terms: The City has no fixed expectations in regard to the terms and conditions of the anticipated disposition of publicly owned property within the Downtown Cleal"Nater Redevelopment Property and is prepared to consider any reasonable proposal from the selected Master Developer. However, the City intends to dispose of the properiy in an lias is condition", with the developer responsible for any environmental remediation and other site preparation costs, Disposition Process: In order to limit the cost and effort on the part of candidate respondents, the disposition process will be conducted in two stages: 1) Request for Developer Qualifications CCRFDQ") and negotiation of a Public/Private Partnership Agreement with a selected Master Developer, and 2) formal disposition proceedings for publicly owned property in accordance with Florida law, Based on the responses to the RFOQ, the City will select a limited number of respondents [(most likely three (3)] and invite the selected respondents to participate in an interviewwith City representatives. After the interviews, the City will rank the respondents. The City will then enter into negotiations for . . .'. . I .' , *' ... .'.' " . . i. " .', . . . ... ..."... J J., . ~.. . . . .' I,'. ~ . , '.: . '.' ~ " DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT a Public/Private Partnership Agreement with the first-ranl,ed qualified Master Developer for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days. If an agreement cannot be reached with the first-ranked qualified Master Developer within one hundred and eighty (180) days and the City does not agree to a further extension of an additional ninety (90) days, due to the City's determination that further negotiations during such extension are unlikely to produce an acceptable agreement, etc., the City will commence negotiations with the next ranked qualified Master Developer, and so on, until an acceptable agreement has been reached with a qualified Master Developer. The Charter of the City of Clearwater requires that the disposition of certain lands owned by the City within the boundaries of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property be approved by a referendum. After the successful negotiation of a Public/Private Partnership Agreement, the City, if a referendum is required, will initiate a referendum and seek approval for the disposition of charter- restricted lands which are to be conveyed pursuant to the terms of the Public/Private Partnership Agreement. The actual disposition of publicly owned property pursuant to the Public/Private Partnership Agreement will require compliance with the disposition requirements of Florida law. The RFDQ requires candidate Master Developers to submit: 1. A detailed description of the developer's qualifications and experience. 2. A description of representative development projects carried out by the respondent. 3. A demonstration of the respondent's ability to secure financing of large-scale development projects. 4. A preliminary development program including proposed land use, intensity and development approach. Schedule: Tile anticipated schedule of the RFDQ process is as follows: Disposition advertised ----------- ----------- -- 1999 I , RFDQ distributed ----------- ----------- -- 1999 , , Deadline for written requests for additional information -----------, ----------- --, 1999 Pre-submission conference -, 1999 at -:- -.m, RFDQ responses due -----------, ----------- --, 1999 at -: -- -. m, RFDQ respondent interviews ---------- ----. 1999 ~.~ , " ,',. ". " : 10.,. ~ . ,'. '. " I , , : " .' ~ '. , ., . '.}' ~ .~ . .'. . DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT · Recommended ranking from City Manager to City Commission --------------- 1999 , Ranking by City Commission -------- ----- -- 1999 , , Commencement of negotiation with preferred developer - ---- -, 1999 Documentation and closing! or negotiation with alternate ranked developer ---- -,1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS PUBLIC NOTICE - REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/DISPOSITION PROGRAM The Project The Property City's Redevelopment Goals Disposition Terms Disposition Process Schedule I, THE CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY ,.........,...1 A, PROJECT BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT .,..........,..,.....,.........,..,....,..,............. 1 City's Redevelopment Goals. .,..,. .,.., ..,. ,........ .,......... .,. .,...,... ....... ... ,..... ,. ...... .,....... 5 General Statements in Regard to Use... .., ..,. ..... ..,... .,.... .,.... ..,.... ,...,...... .,.... ...... ...6 B. LOCATION..... .,.......... .., .,. ....... .,..,. ,.. .,............... ..,... ... .,. ... .,........ ,...,... .,. .,.... .......,.7 C. SITE INFORMATION..... ....".... .,.... ... .,.,................... .,. .,. ... ............ ..,...... ....,. .......,.7 1. Legal Description ... ....... .........., .,.......... .,. ...... ... ... .,. .,. .,.. ...., ..,. ,.... ....,. .......,.7 2, Site Characteristics ....... .,...... ............ ..,....... ,. .,. .,. .,. .,............. .,.....,. .,. .,. .,..,.8 3. Site Uti Iities ....,.....,.........,........,.,...........,.....,...........,.........,.......,...........,..,. 8 4. Environmental Conditions .,... ....,................. ,. .,. .,................ ... .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,.8 5. Comprehensive Plan Designation..... .,. ......... .,. .,. .,. .,. ......... .,. .,. ....,.......... .,.9 6. Zoning ,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,.........., .,.,. .., .,. ." .,. ." ." ." .,. ... ... .,. ... ." ." ... ." .,. .,. ... .,. '.. .,. ...9 0, DESIRED DEVELOPMENT..... ,.... ...... .,.... .,. .,....... .,. .,.... .,. .,. .,. .,. .., .,. .,. ............ .,. .,.9 '..:>;. . "" ' .'. _ . . _ ... ':. l' . "',......'. .' " ~ . . . . ~ _, _ .' . ... , . . . '. ~. .. I .. " '" ' . (' '. DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT E. DISPOSITION TEf1N1S .,.... ,. ...... .,. ....,. .,...... .,..,...... .,. .,......... ... ...... ........... ... ... ..... 10 II. DISPOSITION PROCESS,.... ,....... ....,.... ........ ........... .,..,.....,. ,.... .,. .,.....,....... ,. ... .,... 10 A. SOLICITATION, EVALUATION AND NEGOTIATION PROCEDURES ....,.....,... 10 1. RFQ and Statement of Qualifications..., ... .,. ...... ..... .,. .,.................. .,.... ..... 10 2. Negotiation of a Public Private Partnership...................,.....,....,..,.....,..,... 11 3. Referendum, if Required............... .,. ..... ... ........... .,. .,. .,. ................. .,. ... ..... 12 4. Deposit,. ....,. .,. ..... .,. .,............ .,....... .,. .,... ... .,...... .,.... .,. .,. .,............... ... ... .,.,. 13 5. Contact Person .,.... .,. ..' .,. ......... ............. .,. .......,......... .,. ........... .,. .,. ....,. .,... 13 III. EVALUATION CRITERIA.,.... .,. ........... .,...,. ,..,...... ... .,..,. ,..... ,. .,. .,..,.......... ,...........,. ,. 14 IV. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS .......,..,.........15 1. Deadline for Submittal of Statements of Qualifications.........,..........,..,.............,. 15 2. Form and Number of Copies... ..... .,....... .,. .,..,... .,. .,. ..... ... .,. .,. .,...... ......... .,. .,....., .,. 15 3. Address for Submittal...................,........,..,....,..,.......,.....,................,..,..,..,.........15 4. Minimum Contents of Statement of Qualifications...... .,. ....,...... ... .,....... .,. .,.....,... 15 V. DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS. ...... ....,... .,. .,..,..,...... .,..,....,.... .,. .,. .,..,..,...... .,.18 Appendices Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property. .........,.... .,..........,. ...... .,.Appendix A Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property - Publicly Owned...,.......Appendix B . Community Redevelopment Boundaries ....,...... .,...... .,..,..,. ..... .......,. ....,.., Appendix C Photograph of the Redevelopment Property '. ...... .,... .,. ... .,. ..... ...... .,. ........ Appendix 0 Rating Matrix, ... .,. .,. ... .,. .,.... ........ .,. .,. .,.... .,.., .,. ...... .,... .,. .,.....,... .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. ...Appendix E CITY OF CLEARWATER REQllEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY DRAFT DATED JULY 1999 PAGE vii 'il,;;. , '. .,.,' . '. ':~. Y,.' ........ "., ,., '. '. f ~. '. .' ...., . ,:.." -~.' \,'., . ..r DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT I. THE DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY A. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The City of Clearwater is located on Florida's West Coast in Pinellas County on the Pinel/as Peninsula between the Gulf of Mexico on the west and Tampa Bay on the east. In 1998, Clearwater was ranked the twelfth largest city in the state and is within the fourth fastest growing region in the Southeast. The City's sub-tropical climate, its accessibility by land, air, and water, its beautiful beaches and cultural offerings attract more than 3 n,illion visitors per year. Recently ranked the safest Florida city by Money Magazine's 1996 poll, Clearwater offers both a beach area and a downtown, With new opportunities constantly being made available, it is quite reasonable to recognize Clearwater's viability as one of Florida's economic and social centers, Clearwater covers a land area of 24.88 square miles with a population of 102,874 people and a median age of 44.5. The annual median household income in 1998 is approximately $32,717.00 with a noted steady increase over time,1 Clearwater's convenient location makes it very accessible to other Florida cities. It is just a short drive to St. Petersburg and Tampa, a two hour drive to Orlando, and a five hour drive to Miami. The Tampa International Airport and St. Petersburg/Clearwater Airport are both located within 30 minutes of downtown. The Clearwater Airpark is located within 5 minutes of downtown. Clearwater is the County Seat of Pinellas County, Pinellas County government's primary campus is located in downtown Clearwater and includes the County Courthouse, utilities Florida Planning Group. Inc., 1996; NDS/UDS Data Services 1998, CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED JULY 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PAGE ii -- - IIlI - -Ilo..___ - ........ "'Y..:~-.\I":... ...':: .. ..1 ~"~"'..';'~/~"'.' ~'I:.: _,. ~,.ll~ " '. .::....' . '..','}';: '::''''~''..:'' .". '.'\"'~ .~ .;::,./,r,;..:.:.'.~:.''''' ~~". t', DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT and all other government support agencies employing approximately 1,800 staff. Twenty- one County seNice buildings encompass approximately 20.5 acres within the Community Redevelopment District, and account for approximately 840,000 square feet of building space. An additional office building with 20,000 square feet is planned to be constructed within the next fiscal year. Approximately 4.3 million tourists visit the Sf. Petersburg/Clearwater area annually.2 With over 4800 rooms to choose from, visitors are able to experience a wide range of hotels, motels, and condominiums. Clearwater is ranked UBest City Beach" in the Gulf region by Stephen P. Leatherman, widely known as "Dr. Beach", as well as having fine dining, nightlife, and entertainment. An array of attractions are available to tourists in the ClealWater area. Regional golf courses and sporting events provide social entertainment for tourists. The core downtown of Clearwater is characterized as lying west of Prospect Street between Chestnut and Drew Streets. Downtown's land use is mainly office and commercial which create the primary pattern for downtown, The "main street" of downtown is State Route 60, Cleveland Street, which has a scattering of retailers and industrial/office buildings. This area offers the greatest redevelopment potential and susceptibility, enabling this city center to become more recognizably urban, The lib luff' I the area in downtown to the west of Osceola from Drew Street on the north to Court Street on the south, offers a spectacular view of the Intracoastal Waterway and the Gulf of Mexico. The upper part of this area is improved with the main City library, City Hall, Harborview, and Calvarj Baptist Church, The downtown area has a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and a Downtown Development Board (008). The boundary is the bay front on the west, Fredrica Avenue on the east, Jones/Drew Street on the north and Chestnut Street on the south (See Appendix ). The eRA operates with tax increment financing, The DDS is a special taxing authority of one mil. Both entities provide support to the City's Main Street program activities. Various main street committees recruit retail businesses and office users, promote the downtown and focus on the visual aspect of the downtown, The Economic Development committee is undertaking a market analysis to develop a business retent,on and recruitment strategy. The Promotion Committee is communicating what downtown has to offer through its downtown newspaper called "Right Downtown." In addition, the Promotion Committee has monthly entertainment in its urban park located in Florida Planning Group, Inc., 1996, CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AI!GliST 1999 REQIJEST FOR QlIALlFICA TIO~S - DOWNTOW~ CLEARWATER REDE:\'ELOP~I Et'iT PROPERTY PAGE 2 .i.,~ ,'./. )'::..:-~.1.,~~,t~.-~."", ""',il' \: :_<: I,' ".' .,,";';.., .... i~:'. t. ....1', ,.'n' '/< .;.... ~. ...... .'r~} ~ ,~.!."": .v".J ...l..~, .~".",' DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT the center of the shopping area. The DDS, CRA and corporate sponsors support these events. The entertainment provides a reason for people to come and to spend money. The Design Committee has a facade improvement grant program. The program provides up to $51000 match to upgrade the physical appearance of the storefronts, This program is successful in eliminating the physical deterioration of the buildings and helps to define the character of the area. The DD8 and Main Street worked together to get murals painted in the downtown and to raise funds to support art in public places, The eRA is actively involved with economic development. One of its successful redevelopment projects is the IMRglobal Corporation Headquarters. The headquarters serves as an anchor and gateway to the downtown. It is located on the eastern end of downtown at the southwest corner of Cleveland Street and Missouri Avenue. The project is on a 14.2 acre Brownfield site. The corporate investment is $60,000,000. It consists of six buildings with a total of 310,000 square feet. The first phase of the project opened July 12,1999. Building Two's occupancy date is scheduled for January 3,2000. A total of 900 employees are expected to occupy the complex its upon completion. The University of South Florida Center of Economic Development Research estimates the impact of IMRglobal's new facility to be at $3.1 million dollars, based on IMR's original plans of bringing 700 jobs and three buildings to downtown. The estimated impact the IMRglobai headquarters will have over the next four years on the downtown and surrounding community will be an additional $500,000 in tax payments to the City's tax base, It will increase the CRA tax increment and have over $68,000,000 of economic impact on the community. IMRglobal Corporation's average annual salary is $42,000 (1400/0 above Pinellas County's average wage). The spin-off from this development is estimated to generate 1,539 additional jobs in Pinellas County. Total annual estimated wages earned in the County as a result of this project would rise by $51,000,000. This project also spurred the replacement of a defunct mall a half-mile south of the IMRglobal site (outside the CRA) with a 60S-unit apartment complex. The eRA area had 3,652,845 square feet of building space in 1998. The break down of the building space devoted to each of the following uses was: Retail Professional Offices Government Offices Restau ra nt/Entertainment Housing 8.480/0 26.660/0 18,630,10 1.610/0 17.920,10 CllYO.'CLEt\RWATER DRAFT DATED AUGUST 1999 REQlIES'f .'OR QUALlFIC\TIONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PAGE 3 ~,~,~~. ;,. .: , \ '~ .) , . ;,~ ',' ....r'.I. "j.J' "', ~.,_ ": .,...... I, ...., '.'~, '~',' '.,'. .~', ~...l r',. DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Industry Warehouse Other Vacant 5.81% 1.850/0 20.900/0 4,600/0 These figures do not include any of the new construction: the IMRglobal headquarters, the 12,000 square feet of office space constructed by Intervest Bank, and the 11,200 square foot Eckerd Drug Store. Additionally, over the past year there were at least four buildings demolished within the CRA to make way for new construction. Harborview Center is Clearwater's waterfront, city-owned Civic Center. It was renovated in 1995 at a cost of approximately $20 million. The ground floor (64,000 square feet) houses the 30,000 square foot exhibit hall and 7,000 square foot deli/restaurant, Pickles Plus. The street-level floor houses Stein Mart, a 53,000 square foot department store. The third floor has 50,000 square feet, including a banquet room overlooking the waterfront, full-service kitchen with professional culinary staff, ballroom, gallery, and six meeting rooms. A 3,000 square foot atrium connects all parts of the building. Harborview Center hosted 497 events in 1998 with an attendance of 148,784, The Center is managed by Globe Facility Services under a contract which expires on September 30, 1999. The City has separate leases with Pickles Plus (expires July, 2003), Boston Concessions (expires September, 2000), and Stein Mart (expires July, 2004, with buy-out clause to 2009). Harborview Center loses approximately $250,000 per year. Clearwater's Main Library has been located on the bluff since 1915. The 50,000 foot structure has been pieced together over the years and is scheduled for demolition when a new library can be built. Twelve million dollars for a new Main Library was appropriated froln Penny for Pinellas funds approved by the voters in 1997, The Library Building Program requires 90,000 square feet for library services and programs, An additional 13,000 square feet of community meeting room space is needed near or in the library. A copy of the Library Building Program will be made available to interested respondents. The current Main Library draws 350,000 visitors per year. A new facility is anticipated to double that number. Internationally-renowned architect. Robert A.M. Stern, has been engaged to work with local architects, Harvard Jolly Clees Tappe, to design the new Main Library, which can be a signature part of the Downtown Redevelopment Property, CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AUGUST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALlFICA 1'ION5 - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPJ\lE:'IiT PROPERTY PAGE 4 ;:~ . 1'"':;1 ':" .f:I"IIIL-",..,I~"..;,:,~,.. .~\ _ ~:_"'J''''''...':, :"'.J'.:~~.'.:~' ~.;".~1,:."l~,'" ........,.11" ",' tt~',.'" ", '. :.~ ~', '. ,r~,...' , DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Coachman Park is a 14-acre waterfront park adjacent to Harborview Center and the Main Library, It was a gift to the City from the Coachman family and is restricted to use as a park and bird sanctuary. Coachman Park has booked 36 festivals, concerts, and other public events (some multi-day) with an expected attendance of 160,000 for 1998-1999. An enlarged amphitheater is planned for 2001-2002. Recently, the City of Clearwater has been actively involved in promoting the development and redevelopment of the City's downtown. In 1998, the City initiated an ambitious community revitalization effort known as /lOne City. One Future." The purpose of the "0ne City, One Future" project is to revitalize and redevelop Clearwater, particularly its beach and its downtown. "0ne City.One Future" involves a variety of public improvements in the Downtown, including landscaping streets, improve lighting, beautification of storefronts and the creation of small pocket parks with pedestrian amenities, At the current time, the City's traditional main street -- Cleveland Street - connects to the Memorial Causeway on the west at the bottom of the Clearwater Bluff. As a part of the "One City, One Future" program, a new high span bridge will be constructed across the main boat channel and connecting an existing pair of one way roads - Court and Chestnut Streets. Cleveland Street will be terminated at some point near the intersection of Osceola Street and Cleveland Street. The City considers the termination of Cleveland Street as a mixed blessing for Downtown Cleveland, In the existing condition, Cleveland Street through the Downtown serves primarily as a high volume, through street which conflicts with the function of the street as a traditional downtown retail street. The termination of Cleveland Street near the Clearwater Bluff creates the opportunity to return Cleveland Street to a functional retail street and the City has already committed to an ambitious renovation program for sidewalks and landscaped medians between Myrtle and Osceola Avenues. The termination of Cleveland Street also creates a challenge for the City since through traffic will travel around downtown, rather than through downtown. In response, the City has initiated a series of programs including this solicitation of a master developer for a destination quality, catalytic redevelopment project on the Cle8rwater Bluff that will serve as a destination anchor in the City's downtown. In addition, the City plans to convert Myrtle Street between Chestnut and Drew into a highly landscaped boulevard which will create a physical and psychological link between the CourtlChestnuteast-west corridor and Cleveland Street and the downtown, The City plans to shift north-south through-traffic from Ft. Harrison to the newly improved My/tie Street in order to convert Ft. Harrison into a two-way, two-lane local downtown street (also connecting to the Court/Chestnut pair) with wide, pedestrian-friendly sidewalks, Finally, CITY OF CLEAR\\XrER DRAFT DATE!) AllGliST 1999 REQlIEST FOR QlIALlFIC\TlONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATk:R REDEVElOl';\IENT PROPERTY PAGE 5 I . ' w , ,'. _ ~ ,.'"' . ,:. " .'" . i '. ,:', ,,'. '. I I '\ .. J' J ..',. ',.4 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT the new bridge will have an intersection on the western edge of the downtown, at the southwestern corner of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property along Pierce Street, which will provide a highly visible entranceway to the Downtown. The City regards the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property as an important redevelopment opportunity which can serve as a catalyst and stimulus for the revitalization of Downtown Clearwater, The City is pursuing the redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property to further the City's overall development and redevelopment objectives and to further strengthen the City's overall fiscal integrity. City's Redevelopment Goals: Catalyst for Revitalization of Downtown Clearwater. The redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should be a catalyst for development and redevelopment in the entire Downtown Clearwater. Destination and Community Focal Point. The redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should seNe as a cultural, civic and economic focal point for the community, and the redevelopment should have the critical mass of uses and activities necessary to be a regional destination as a place of social, cultural, economic and residential character in order to enhance Clearwater's quality of life. Linkages and Connections. The redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should be designed so that the development forms physical and visual linkages and connections with adjacent areas and neighborhoods in and outside of the traditional downtown, Design Quality. The redevelopment or the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should be designed with IIlandmark" visual qualities befitting the strategic location and character of the Property, Fiscal Benefit to the City. The development of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property should be fiscally beneficial to the City of Clearwater. General Statements in Regard to Use: Residential: There is strong community support for residential housing on the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property, CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AlJGlJST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALU"ICA TlONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REI)[VELOPMENT PROPERTY PAGE 6 . \ \.' '. ~ ,'" , , \ ~ -,' . ''''1 .'. ~" '," ..' '. . .' "', /. ~ ; DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Commercial: There is a strong desire in the community to transform downtown Clearwater into a distinct retail destination, Ideally, the City would like to see the Downtown redeveloped in a manner that would allow the Downtown to serve as a destination, a virtual "East Beach" where residents and visitors would go for evening entertainment. A cinema has been identified as a very desirable element of a revitalized Downtown Clearwater. There is a consensus that the site has substantial potential for commercial use with a creative mix and design of uses. Office: There is no particular community support for the development of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property with multi-tenant office buildings. Public or Quasi-Public Uses: Much of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property is currently used for public purposes and there is a strong desire among many citizens that the area retain a "public character" particularly along the waterfront on the "bottoms" of the Bluff. That desire, however, is tempered with a very strong desire to use public/private redevelopment of the Bluff as a catalyst for the redevelopment and revitalization of the entire Downtown, The existing Coachman's Park is well-used for municipal events and the City is very interested in replacing the existing stage with a full-production amphitheater and expanding the capacity of the Park for outdoor entertainment. The City would be very interested in a public/private partnership which would allow for the expansion of this function of the Park by integrating the performance venue into a great urban waterfront. In that context, the City would be also willing to consider the possible redevelopment of the Harborview Center, a 160,000 square foot conference center which has not met community expectations, As currently configured, the Harborview Center has a 53,000 square foot retail tenant on the Osceola Street level and the balance of the space is devoted to meeting rooms of various sizes. The City has no particular redevelopment concept in mind for the Harborview Center, although a number of uses including the conversion of the Center to a shopping center and/or a cinema have been discussed over the years. In addition, the City has committed to the construction of a new library and has budgeted at least $12 million for a proposed library, The City would be willing to consider a public/private partnership whereby the library was included in a mixed-use redevelopment project. The City is prepared to participate in providing off-street parking in support of the redevelopment of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property through the provision of land and the use of its borrowing authority . CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATEI> AUGUST 1999 REQl'EST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROIJERTY PAGE 7 . ~. , ~' 0 . . . < . "OJ ~.. . ... '., I' , . , ... .... DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT B. LOCATION The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property is bounded on the west by Clearwater Bay and is located to the south of Drew Street, west of Ft. Harrison and north of Pierce Street. The specific boundaries of the area are shown in Appendix The site is strategically located between Clearwater Beach, Island Estates and the balance of the City of Clearwater. There are 206,512- persons who reside within 10 miles of Downtown Clearwater with an aggregate 1998 household income of $2,242,000,000. Downtown Clearwater is the county seat of Pine lias County (County Administration Building, courthouse etc,), and contains the City Hall of the City of Clearwater and the World Education Center of the Church of Scientology. The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property represents an important opportunity for the City of Clearvvaterto influence the future of the City. The property is unique in Florida because the western edge of the Downtown, just to the west of Osceola, is a bluff with an elevation of 28 plus feet above the waterfront. Views from the Bluff to the west across Clearwater Bay are spectacular. c. SITE INFORMATION 1. Description The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property is comprised of approximately 28.52 acres of land, including the public rights-of-way which lie within the boundaries of the Property. The ownership of the property is mixed, The City of Clearwater owns the majority of the land, The Calvary Baptist Church is a relatively large property owner (the sanctuary is on the Bluff at the southwest corner of Osceola and Cleveland and retail space along Cleveland) which has publicly announced its intention to relocate to another part of Clearwater. The balance of the private holdings is in relatively small parcels. Public ownership of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property is generally depicted in Appendix B. 2. Site Characteristics The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property is composed of two major categories of lands: 1) lands on the top of the bluff: 2) lands between the foot of the bluff (east of Osceola) and the intracoastal waterway waterfront. The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property includes 31 platted parcels of land which comprise approximately CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AlIG\JST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUAUFICA TION5 - DOWNTOWN CLEARW A TER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PAGE 8 . ~'~ '. .., '.. "",., ." /' ,\"', -. ',' 1, .. 1 " ~ .,. "" i .' - . ' " ~ ,r . DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 28,52 acres of land, including the public rights of way. It is anticipated that the rights of way within the general boundaries of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property will be vacated by the City of Clearwater in favor of the Master Developer. The elevation of the property ranges from 5,5' to 33' (Source: City of Clearwater Engineering Topographic Maps). The improvements which are currently located on the property include a library building slated for demolition, a series of privately-owned office and retail buildings with attendant surface parking; the Harborview Center, a municipally owned 160,000 square foot conference center with extensive surface parking; the sanctuary and education buildings of the Calvary Baptist Church, City Hall and the Coachman's Park band shell. A photo of the site as it currently looks is attached as Appendix 0, 3. Site Utilities Water, electricity, sanitary sewer, cable television and gas are available to the site, Water: The City of Clearwater provides potable water service to this site, Electricity: Electric service is available from Florida Power Corporation. Sanitary Sewer: The Sanitation Department of the City pro'Jides sanitary sewer service to this site. Cable: Cable television service is available in the area through Time Warner Cable Company. Gas: Natural gas is available from the Gas System of the City of Clearwater. 4. Environmental Conditions The City makes no warranties, expressed or implied, about the existing or future environmental conditions of the Property, including possible present or future pollution of the air, water or soil from any sources, such as underground migration or seepage (including radon gas). The City expressly disclaims any liability or any type of damages, whether direct, indirect or consequential, which the demised premises or any person may suffer because of any existing or future environmental conditions, The City intends to dispose of the property on an lias is" basis. CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATE!) AllGlJST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALU'ICATlONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PA(iE 9 ,. . . ~. ~ I . _. ..\, . ~. '; :..-., ~"', . '~""'. ~ ", ~,' ,: '. .....: ;'.. ~, " . ',,, ." .. . . 1 '. ~,. # Jr,., I;.. It. '". ,.' 1 ., ~ DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 5. Comprehensive Plan Designation The DO\\fntown Clearvvater Redevelopment Property is designated commercial-industrial, commercial-retail/institutional on the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater. 6. Zoning The property is currently zoned Downtown. The current zoning would allow the property to be developed as mixed use, including Harborview Expansion, Open Space/Recreational, Commercial/Office, Residential, Public/Government, and Religious/Institutional.. The City would be willing to consider any amendment to the Land Development Regulations and the Zoning Atlas which are necessary to achieve the City's Redevelopment Goals. D. DESIRED DEVELOPMENT The City has not established a specific development program for the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property, and the City is willing to consider any responsible development proposal which is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the City's Redevelopment Goals which are set out in this RFDQ. The City is willing to consider a redevelopment proposal for all or any portion of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property, but encourages candidate developers to consider as comprehensive a redevelopment program as possible. To the extent practicable, the City would encourage candidate respondents to consider: public/private mix of uses a mix of uses, including residential retail and restaurant uses which complement, reinforce and serve existing areas which surround the property creative design which reinforces linkages between the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property and the balance of the Downtown uses. intensity of uses and design that would create a destination-quality place high quality design that will enhance the City's image and serve as a landmark pedestrian accessibility to and through the property strong relation to the immediate vicinity's existing street pattern reasonable impact on local traffic conditions for projects that are anticipated to be staged, an initial phase which is functional and self-sufficient inclusion of a new library and a new or existing city hall. CITY OJ" CLEARWATER DRAFT I>ATED AUGllST 1999 REQllEST FOR QllAUHCATlOi'iS - DOW~TOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOI)~IENT PROPERTY PAGE 10 .. .' I 'f . ".' '. .", ~~. . - ~. 'I - . '.', : ". , . f ", i . " ' ~ A '".. 1 \ " .' ,'. , .... : " " DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT E. DISPOSITION TERMS The City will entertain acquisition proposals on any terms and conditions which will ensure that the City's Redevelopment Goals can be realized. Although it is anticipated that a long term lease of the City's ownership (subject to certain charter limitations) is the most likely means of achieving the City's expectations, the City invites respondents to submit whatever proposals are judged to meet the City's Redevelopment Goals. The City intends to dispose of the property on whatever terms are agreed upon in the Public/Private Partnership Agreement on an lias is" basis, and in particular, the City intends that the responsibility for any and all environmental remediation shall be the responsibility of the successful respondent. [describe incentives which could be available] II. DISPOSITION PROCESS A. SOLICITATION, EVALUATION AND NEGOTIATION PROCEDURES In the interest of limiting the initial investment of effort and cost on the part of respondents, the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property disposition process is organized in two stages: 1) Request for Qualifications ("RFOQ"); 2) Negotiation of a Public/Private Partnership with a selected Master Developer. A third stage of public approval may be required, depending on the terms of the Agreement as it affects the bluff. 1. RFDQ and Statement of Qualifications Respondents shall submit the following information in their Statements of Qualifications in response to this RFDQ: 1. A detailed description of the respondent's qualifications and experience. 2. A description of representative development projects carried out by the respondent. 3. A demonstration of the respondent's ability to secure financing of large-scale development projects. 4. A preliminary development program including proposed land use, intensity and development approach. CITY OF Cl.EARW ATER DRAFT 1>:\ TED AUGlJST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALlF1CATI01l'S - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REI)E\'ELOP~IEl"T PROPERTY PAGE 11 , :,~~ ~ '" ,\..."~..~, \ ' .;~ 1':~,.<,;''''''''::7'''.''''':,~,< ....~\,..~,11t.'~..:'"~':,'~:.:,.:':I.:.",....~~:;:"f~.l'j,.t1~-.*:;~....'r ..~..,.:!..t~".. ~/t~~~'''.';'.! " ;":l,.,-:t~t"~'l' .~). '<''''~J':'-;.:''''':'4.:,~t:,t'.'!''~,~J.;'',t.':','''/ I,t.t''''':;f DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT The City emphasizes that it does not require nor expect respondents to submit a specific development plan or design concept based on detailed architectural and engineering work as a part of their Statement of Qualifications. The City expects each respondent to submit a preliminary development program indicating the proposed uses and intensity of uses which the respondent would intend to pursue in the development of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Property. The City will consider any material, including plans or other illustrative graphics, which indicate the character or quality which respondent would intend to pursue on the subject property. The City expects respondents to give special attention to a demonstration of the respondent's ability to secure construction and permanent financing for major real estate projects. In the event that a respondent refers to a specific development project in describing the respondent's qualifications, experience and capability, the respondent should describe the role the respondent played in each such project. The Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in bound form in a 8% x 11 format plus one unbound copy. Respondents may include documents larger than 8% x 11 provided that such documents are folded and/or inserted in a pocket which is bound into the Statement. An unbound original and eleven (11) bound copies of the respondent's Statement of Qualifications are required to be submitted in a sealed envelope received by the Purchasing Manager of the City of Clearwater no later than 4:00 p.m. on ---------, ----- --, 1999. All Statements of Qualifications which are timely received will be opened immediately after -:-- -.m. on ---------, ----- --, 1999 and the Statements will be delivered to the City Manager's office for review and analysis. The City Manager's Office, with the assistance of the City's consultant, Charles L. Siemon, of the firm of Siemon & Larsen of Boca Raton, Florida, will prepare a rating matrix of each of the respondents based on the Statements of Qualification which are received (the matrix will be in substantial compliance with Appendix E), and will recommend the ranking of the respondents in consultation with the City Manager, according to each of the respondent's qualifications, experience and capability. The City Manager will conduct interviews of all of the respondents and, based on the Statement of Qualifications and the inteNiews, will recommend a ranking of the respondents to the City Commission. The City Commission will consider the City Manager's recommended rankings and make final ranking determination. The City Commission mayor may not conduct independent inteNiews with one or more of the ranked respondents. CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATEI) Al;Gl'ST 1999 REQlJEST FOR QlJALlFlCATfOi'iS - DOWNTOWi'i CLEARWATER RE()E\'ELOI}~IE~T PnOPERTY P,\GE 12 '.>t. ~ '"".,... . i....~..,'.,_ ., " " I,' !...-::'" ....,' l.~,.'~. '. IJ.:r':", ,., t ..,' l ,1.", DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 2. Negotiation of a Public Private Partnership Following the ranking of the respondents, the City will commence negotiation of a Public/Private Partnership Agreement with the first ranked Master Developer for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days. If an agreement cannot be reached with the first- ranked qualified Master Developer within one hundred and eighty (180) days and the City does not agree to a further extension of an additional ninety (90) days for the reason that the City determines that further negotiations during such extension are unlikely to produce an acceptable agreement, the City will commence negotiations with the next ranked qualified Master Developer, and so on, until an acceptable agreement has been reached with a qualified Master Developer. After the successful negotiation of a Public/Private Partnership Agreement, the City, if a referendum is required, will initiate a referendum and seek approval for the disposition of charter-restricted lands which are to be conveyed pursuant to the Public/Private Partnership Agreement. The Public/Private Partnership Agreement will address the following: a. A specific development program including: a) uses and intensity of uses; b) land area to be redeveloped; c) off-street parking; d) streets, pedestrian ways, plazas and parks. b. A preliminary site plan. c. A design pallette for public and private places and structures. d. A development schedule. e. The terms and conditions for the disposition of public property. f. The terms and conditions for assembly assistance in regard to privately-owned property. g. The terms and conditions of the provision of off~street parking. h. Capital improvement agreements. i. Joint operating agreements for any public/private uses. 3. Referendum, if Required. CIT\'OFCLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AUCIJST 1999 REQUEST FOR Ql1ALlFlCATlONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWA'rER Rf:DEVEI.O')MENT PRO')ERT\' PAGE 13 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT The City Charter provides that certain lands owned by the City of Clearwater may not be conveyed for private use without approval at a public referendum. While substantial lands which are not subject to those restrictions are included within the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property, the City anticipates the possibility that a referendum will be required to carry out the desired redevelopment. The City is therefore prepared to submit those portions of the negotiated Public/Private Partnership Agreement related to Charter- restricted lands to a referendum and to campaign assiduously within the limits of law in favor of the passage of the referendum. The City understands that the possibility of a referendum introduces an uncertainty into the redevelopment process and has designed the RFDQ and Public/Private Partnership Agreement process to minimize a candidate developer's investment risk prior to the referendum. The City has conducted a survey of public opinion and believes that the redevelopment of the City's downtown is an important objective and that disposition of Charter-restricted lands in support of a quality redevelopment project is broadly supported in the community. The City Commission voted unanimously to solicit a master developer. 4. Deposit. No deposit will be required for the submission of an RFDQ. The City will require a deposit of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) to be made by the first ranked master developer prior to commencement of negotiations in regard to a Public/Private Partnership Agreement, which shall be non-refundable. In the event that a Public/Private Partnership Agreement can not be successfully negotiated with the first ranked respondent, the second ranked respondent shall be required to submit a deposit of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) which shall be non-refundable, and so on until a Public/Private Partnership Agreement has been successfully negotiated. 5. Contact Person Procedural questions related to the disposition process should be directed to: Robert Keller Assistant City Manager City of Clearwater 112 S. Osceola Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 (727) 562-4047 CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AlJGtJST 1999 REQUEST "'OR QlJALlFICATIO~S - DO\VNTOW~ CLEARWATER REt>E\'I-:LOI)~IENT PROPERTY PAGE 14 , ," ~;" .. ". ,.', ,.." ,.,,' ,'~ ~_'<,.' '/'fll" < ',,\~ .I.~'$ , : '. I ....'.. ,." ." ',' .~' '''0 .: .,",'~ ,.1' I DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Requests for substantive clarification or information should be submitted in writing to the same address. Please note that Statements of Qualifications are to be submitted to the Office of the Purchasing Manager, not to the Department of Planning and Development or the City Manager. 6. Schedule: The anticipated scheduling of the RFDa process is as follows: Disposition advertised ----------- ----------- -- 1999 ) , RFDQ distributed ----------- ----------- -- 1999 , , Deadline for written requests for additional information ----------- ----------- -- 1999 , , Pre-submission conference -, 1999 at -:- -.m. RFDQ responses due -----------, ----------- --, 1999 at -:-- -.m. RFDQ respondent interviews ---------- ----, 1999 · Recommendation from City Manager to City Commission of short list 1999 ------...------ , Selection by City Commission --------, ----- --, 1999 Negotiation of Public/Private Partnership Agreement ------, ----- --, 1999 at -:-- -.m. III. EV ALUA TION CRITERIA The following evaluation criteria will be considered by the City in the selection of a Master Developer: Qualificationsand experience of the respondent and key members of the development team). CIT\' OFCLEARw,n'ER DRAFT DATEI) AUGllST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALlFICATIONS- DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROI)ERTY PAGE 15 . ", . . '^. '.' .~. \.' . - ':' .... . .... . . . .-..,.. '. . .~ " DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Financial capacity of the respondent to acquire and develop the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property. The extent to which the preliminary development program is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and the City's Redevelopment Goals. CrrYOF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AUGllST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PAGE 16 :r. ....:.~ .' ' , , I. '.".. . . I .' ..., '",", c '. . . . ~," '! , : . ". : ~ . , '," ". _.. DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT IV. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Deadline for Submittal of Statements of Qualification Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted to the Purchasing Manager before -:-- -.m. on --------, ----- --, 1999. 2. Form and number of copies Each respondent shall submit one (1) unbound original and eleven (11) bound copies of their Statement of Qualifications in 8% x 11 format. The Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in a sealed envelope marked in bold: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS CITY OF CLEARWATER RFDQ NO. 99-99 CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 3. Address foi' submittal Statements of Qualification shall be sent to: Office of the Purchasing Manager City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 (727) 562-4634 4. Minimum Contents of Statements of Qualification Each Statement of Qualification shall include the following information (to the extent that a respondent is comprised of one or more business entity or person, information relative to each member of such team shall be provided): Qualifications CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AUGUST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPJ\IENT PROPERTY PAGE 17 'J\' . , , t, - ~ ,., ':.~,. :~,' '" -'~--:'''''''., ~:';', ,\,:'. ",. ^ ,," ,'. -.;,. .'....?";... ':';."~; ',,',-.'. Ie' ": -t, "',... ,<-;::-- ., .....-~ ' " .' DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Name and address of respondent, including all team members if any, including personnel who will be involved and the business addresses of key individuals. Nature of respondent's business organization including state of incorporation or formation of partnership, if any. Respondent's organizational structure. The respondent's professional qualifications and experience in development, financing and management of comparable projects. The specific role played by the respondent in any project which is referred to in regard to the respondent's experience shall be described in detail. Documentation demonstrating the respondent's financial capacity to acquire and develop the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property and to obtain financing for large scale real estate development projects. List of references including contact names, addresses and telephone and facsimile numbers. Preliminary Development Project Program Description of preliminary development program including proposed uses, intensity of uses and general character of development. Description of types and numbers of structures, including anticipated dimensions and character of buildings Description of anticipated pricing of real estate products and other ind icators of character and quality of the proposed development program Description of special amenities or design features anticipated to be included in the development program In their Statement of Qualifications, the City expects candidates to focus on the respondent's qualifications and experience and to illustrate the character of development proposed with illustrations of other development projects. I n their Statement of CITY OF CLEARWATER DRA FT DATED AUGUST 1999 REQUEST FOR QUALlFlCt\ TIONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PAGE 18 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Qualifications, the City expects respondents to describe their experience with similarly situated properties or projects and to demonstrate their ability to understand and successfully deal with the physical and market environment influencing the project concepts. The City encourages respondents to use whatever materials are available, including graphic images (photographs and/or drawings) of projects in which the respondent was not involved, but which are images which reflect concepts or ideas which the respondent proposes for the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Property. \ i i j " ~ ~ ~ . ~ l , 'A '. " ;; ,i ~ ~1 ~ ~ r , ':~ CIT\' OF CLEARWA'fER DRAFT DATED AUGUST 1999 REQ\IEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PAGE 19 ......_'~'.ttf....:;~~1~~..~ _::!,~.J.:,...~,,~. ':~ ...:-:.':'.::.:......;-.l'.::.'..~~,.....~t..'.._;~......r.;..a:r'. ....... :~.),. _.a;:" ""':- >.:; ~.:, -'_'~~'" :...:.,....~,..,'..:;: )...._."....:;:.;..'.~...,'..~...:.~l.,...,~,.. DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT v. DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS The information contained in this Request for Qualifications ("RFDQ") is provided solely for the convenience of the proposer. The City has assembled the information in a good faith effort to assist in the disposition process; however, the City makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy of the information. It is the responsibility of the proposer to verify that the information presented is accurate and complete and any reliance on the information contained herein or from communications with City representatives or its advisor(s) is and shall be at the respondent's sole and exclusive risk. The City reserves the right to accept any submittal and/or proposals deemed to be in the best interest of the City, to waive any irregularities in any proposals, or to reject any and/or all submittal and/or proposals and to re-advertise for new proposals. The City of Clearwater assumes no financial or other obligation to any respondent. Any Statement of Qualifications submitted in response to this RFDQ is at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement. Neither the City of Clearwater nor any of its advisor(s) will pay a brokerage, finders or referral fee to any party in connection with this RFDQ. In the event of any conflict between this section and the rest of the RFDQ, the provisions of this section shall take precedence. The responsibility for submitting a Statement of Qualifications to the City Clerk on or before the stated time and date will be solely and exclusively the responsibility of the respondent. No extensions of time will be considered and no Statement of Qualifications received after the stated time and date will be considered, except for Statements which were unavoidably delayed at no fault of the respondent by the United States Post Office or a commercial overnight carrier provided that the respondent can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the Statement was timely submitted to such carrier on or before such carrier's published deadline for delivery in the City of Clearwater before 4:00 p.m. CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAFT DATED AUGllST 1999 REQllEST "'OR QUALIFICATIONS - DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PAGE 20