07-13-1992
, '
. .
, .. ,
; . ~:
" '-,'
, "
Agenda/C
7-13-92
i
"
,
t
(
I
I
!
i
,
.
,
!
!
I
!
i
~
,
i
i
O,3~/
~\>t.". ' ,
:' ,
AGENDA
Community Redevelopment Agency
July 13, 1992
immediately following Pension Trustees meeting
I. Call to order
II. Approval of Minutes of:
6/1 8/92
III. Authorize purchase of Lots 4-10,
Blk 19 of Gould & Ewing's Second
Addition to Clearwater Harbor,
located at 616-6268 Cleveland
Street from William Kravas for a
total price of $365,000 plus
customary closing costs subject to
contract review by the City
Attorney and Seller's attorney
IV. Direction to pursue expansion of
tt16 eRA area as proposed in the
draft Downtown Development Plan
V. Adjournment
1
";: ~ \: ,{ ,; >'" <. ", {>:," .'" .,' .. ....;;,,: ;. < ':,,\.,:: '''<il'';' ,~. ;,'~,;1
, \~r:,:,,::,':' " ,.', , '. ,'".' ",' '" , ,/ " ,,\ / ,I "
... ....., .'. '.. ,.... ....._ ,'- '.- -;-'. .'\' \.,_~f~:A...~\_"~.: ,'._ / \:.' " ' '., ",., ...... .,',,_ .....\':.;.:.'" /.'
Item#~
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Meeting Date: 07/13/92
SUBJECT:
Purchase of Property located 616 - 626 B Cleveland street.
-
RECOMMENDATION/MOTION:
Authorize the purchase of Lots 4 through 10, Block 19 of Gould and Ewing's
Second Addition to Clearwater Harbor, located at 616 through 626 B Cleveland
Street from William Kravas for a total price of $365,000 plus customary closing
cost, subject to contract review by the city Attorney and Seller's attorney.
~ and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
-
BACKGROUND:
For several months, staff from the Department of Economic Development has been
involved in negotiations with William Kravas for the sale of his property
located at 616 through 626 B Cleveland street.
This .83 acre property encompasses a series of narrow bay buildings fronting
Cleveland street and a metered parking lot in the rear leased to the city. The
property is adjacent to station Square Park, a mini-park recently installed by
the CRA.
Department staff recommends purchase of this property for a variety of reasons.
First, the retailers in downtown have long argued for visible surface parking.
Since this lot is already metered and was recently resurfaced, it would fulfill
this requirement quite nicely. Should the eRA consummate the purchase, staff
would recommend the bui~dings be demolished and expand the parking lot. The
meters which are currently in place are long-term parking meters. These should
be changed to short-term meters to accommodate short-term parkers. Secondly,
aside from the convenience and economics offered by the ready-to-use parking
lot, it is in the eRA's best interest to own the property adjacent to the mini-
park. Should this property be purchased by a private individual or group,
there is no guarantee that the uses would be complimentary or compatible with
the existing mini-park.
The price for the land and improvements is $365,000 - all cash at closing - or
approximately $10.10 per square foot. For comparison purposes, department
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
,~f(.,JJL
N/A
N/A
Nt
N'A
Originating Dept:
Economic
o eve l opment
Costs:
So 365.000
Totat
Commission Action:
o Approved
(J Approved w/cond~tions
o Denied
[J Continued to:
User Dept:
$
CUrrent Fiscal Yr.
Advertised:
Date: N/A
Paper:
~ Not Required
Affected Parties
181 Noti fi ed
o Not Requ ired
Flnding Source:
~ Cap; ta lImp.
o Operat ing
o Other
Attachmet'lts:
181 None
Appr~riation Code:
315-1-4782-601-554
"~
, .
. .~ .
.. ::,'") ',': ';.:, ? ~:i ?~:; : , . . .' :.:':,";,: i'}? ,:i~;.,:"::~;.;; ~~.;< ('~t::..,~:J<'...~ ":t?; ,~' ~: '.~.'.;",\: .'> . ,;';,::: :',"':;.'J,' ~.
~... .,_ \..'" ", ,',' ..' ,11, ',' \" ',' .:'''''h, .lr ,__~,. '/' '~'::'" ,', ,,_...' ,',,' ,..'_L, ,.~,
.- I, ~ .,...... ' ,"- ", .... ....-:..:'t~\1 . \.. ....l~.' ~~.'" -'..". \ \,~ ,:',~ ' .;
- 2 -
corner of Laura street and East street).
frontage on Cleveland street is priced at
occupy 21,000 square feet plus or minus.
foot would be approximately $11.67.
Given the proximity to Cleveland street, and the mini-park and the fact that
the area is presently used as a metered lot, staff feels the Rravas property
should be purchased.
This parcel of land which has no
$245,000. The land and improvements
At this price, the cost per square
Funds are available in eRA code 315-1-4782-601-554 for this purchase.
. / <:\ " , . . '. ' .' I ',\ , / " ~ . 1 / \ , , \"' ' , , "~ 'll ..' 'I' ....,' ' / / I '
, ~ ;' '~ . ./ . I '. , ". I . ' "', ~ I" . ,\ ~ r ~l . '. ,. \) .! ,: I . ." . ~. " I ~ . '.' I, I l' . .', / \. / I
/" . '\. . '\..:... \ . " . I . . \" '., / l' j. - J 1 / <4" ':"'. ~ "..: -.. : I' I / ~. ,\ .
1, ~"":(~'\ J "". I .' "., , " /'\ .', \', ."l/ -'{.:,( /' './' .1 ".. ~'~ ,'~~\,I '(" ,'..-' -..... "I.
I ' " . , ...' , , '" I" . , , ' \ r ,~. \' -' ,\. " " / '", . 1 " ,1/
.. , ' ,'/ , ' . .. ' ' "J I.. ,.", , ' " ' , I
, ,'-", " , '" , ' ',,',.' , ,1' ',' "J' ~ ,,\ " ,.- ..." ..'"., . 'I' <;' "\' ',' fll I ','
I . " '~~""",." ". .\1 /.',';: J j/ . ' _~ .. \ '.' .' ..., .~ \', " ',';' "'.. ,
" . I .\ 't. ..t. '." }, , I ' , "",:.', \ I' . " . \ . " j
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item II _I V.
Meeting Date: 07/13/92
SUBJECT:
Community Redevelopment Agency (eRA) Consideration of Proposed Expansion of Downtown CRA Area
RECOMMENDA nON/MOTION:
Direct staff to pursue expansion of the CRA area as proposed in the draft Downtown Development Plan
[J and that the appropriate officials be authoriz~ to execute same.
-
BACKGROUND:
Intergovernmental coordination/review of the proposed Downtown Development Plan and the associated
expansion of the CRA area requires a number of steps. These steps are summarized in the attached
table (Attachment A) listing implementation actions for the Plan; the specific steps that must be followed
for coordination with Pinellas County are described in detail in the attached review procedure for
redevelopment plans provided to staff by Pinellas County (Attachment B).
Primarily because of the need to coordinate with Pinellas County on this matter, the staff is seeking
direction from the eRA regarding the proposed expansion of the Downtown. The draft Downtown
Development Plan proposes to expand the Downtown in four discrete areas. These areas are described
and mapped in the Plan, and are summarized in Attachment C.
Staff feels that the proposed expansion is necessary due to existing conditions in these areas that
promote redevelopment and support the overall Downtown area. We are requesting direction from the
CRA that we initiate the intergovernmental coordination called for in Step 1 of Attachment B. Providing
this direction at this time does not commit the eRA or the City Commission to ultimately approving the
Downtown Development Plan or any portion thereof.
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
,.
Costs: S If/A
Total
User Dept:
S N/A
Current Fiscal Yr.
C~ission Action:
[] Approved
[] Approved w/conditions
[] Deni ed
[] Continued to:
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
a Not Requi red
Affected Parties
[J Not i f i ed
121 Not Requi red
Fundi~ Source:
o Capital 1l11l.
o Operating
o Other
AA1ropriotion Code:
Attaa.ents:
- Att. A - Implementation
SUlIT\a ry
- Att. B - Review Procedures
- Att. C - Expansion Areas
Taxable Values Table
0"'," l
....I' Pr i nted on recyc ed paper
~ , \ , ' ,.', ' , , , ' " ,', ,'. " , ' . " ' '. ~, , ..,: ,.... ' , " " 'I.. . ',,/, l
" ;-.....I/....~\ ,......~.." '..'...~~... 1/..:....... I ,. " '.,' )............ ,....~.l..O::'\...) ,t.II/, il.\ .......~-I' "\"'\'/" .\. 't
'1 . _ \: ,_4,. \' ': .. ~:: ' :-.,:~.' ~ :' ..'I \'.,' . ". '- ',' '. . L "."". :. ':',. '.:_ . ,'.. .' '. . : . ,./'....' '; , 'I., ....",..., ',.. , "'::",~"" ;'... /"',' '.' ~ -. /'
, :' , ,'., ' ,. -, ,'" '. , ' ' .' , " , . ," ( ',' , . " . ' ' .. " ,., \, " " , , /,,'/ '/ I' , \ : "'.
,'..,:: :::' ,-('"',"",,. ',.':','" ~ ,'.' <I,~.'......< <<,:":, ''>',-:':',:: ,~>:>:. ",':, '<.:..,.,,'j, ';: .':. .......':,......., ;",;: ':', ,\:: :":'!<"~.'.',I..).>,:..:. .".:~;' .'/".".<
,"/ rt!_/. " , "~'" ., "'::J. :' ,\ ,,'~/, ' ,"...,.~'/' " ,,__,'~,_' ",', ,,'..., ',\" \ :,'"'''' ;,-,,'
. . . \" --:. . - \. '. . . ~ ';'" .,': ~,,'. I' . .. ;..", ......... '.. <' _.f' ..... ..... ~ "
ATTACHMENT A
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS AND SCHEDULE
ACTION NECESSARY
CITY COMMISSION AUTHORIZES PUBLIC HEARING FOR
ZONING AND LAND USE PLAN CHANGES AND CODE
AMENDMENTS (RECEIPT AND REFERRAL)
NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF PROPOSED REZONING,
LUP AND LDCA CHANGES
- LETTERS PREPARED BY PLANNING
- LETTERS MAILED BY CLERK
- AD. PREPARED BY PLANNING
- AD. RUN BY CLERK
NOTIFY TAXING AUTHORITIES OF CRA BOUNDARY
CHANGES
- LETTERS MAILED BY PLANNING
REQUEST PINELLAS COUNTY TO:
- DELEGATE REDEV. AUTHORITY
- DESIGNATE CITY COMMISSION AS REDEV. AGENCY
- NOTIFY PROP. APPRAISER OF AFFECTED TIF
PARCELS (PIN'S)
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING
DEADLINE DATE
JUNE 4
- JUNE 5
- JUNE 10
- JUNE 11
- JUNE 16 & 25
JULY 17
JULY 17
JUNE 30
(AD. JUNE 6 & 25)
CRA MEETING
- PRELIM. APPROY AL OF eRA BOUNDARY CHANGES
- PRELIM. APPROVAL OF TIF TRUST FUND
CITY COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING (lST RDG,)
- REZONING
- LUP CHANGES
- LDCA CHANGES
- PRELIM. ADOPTION OF DDP
REQUEST PINELLAS COUNTY TO:
- APPROVE REDEV. PLAN
- APPROVE TRUST FUND
SEND LUP CHANGES TO DCA
REVISE PLAN PER COUNTY, DCA COMMENTS
CITY COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING (2ND RDG.)
- REZONING
- LUP CHANGES
- LDCA CHANGES
- FINAL ADOPTION OF DDP
- STA APPLICATION AUTHORIZATION
CRA
- FINAL APPROVAL OF CRA BOUNDARY CHANGES
- FINAL APPROY AL OF TIF TRUST FUND
JULY 13
AUGUST 13
AUGUST 13
AUGUST, 1992
NOVEMBER, 1992
DECEMBER, 1992
(AD. RUN BY CITY
CLERK 5 DAYS PRIOR
TO MEETING)
- , ,
>,' :>~':, ,":,\ ; ',: ;",':, ',,~~: ;':-' :~'~:," ":~:;"I,":',I;Y,',\~:. ,;,> >:, ,I":'~': .~' ': ,;,' ~ ~~..,;'~~::~,,~;";: '~~~': "~, ~':' : "':,:,,~;: '." ~~' ~:,,' ;,::: :,":;c'!~~;:~'~ ': " ',:':,:' ~ :'" X(~;,'~ ,', :'~":~,~',~':' ,~': ~;:?,,' A,""-":::' ':," ~ :, ',/~;' ',~::, ',":, ,",,-; , -~, :';"'" ,;, '. ,: ..,,'~..~',
',' _'I,,'" ,]0 \ /,..," .",/, '. ',\,." '"I" ,:~'I"~", "/ '," ,- ':' ,,', "",', "'/' ,'I .. /,
," .' ~< .':" ' ' '" " . <' "I ,'~'" ~~'<, .I' <: ",\ ..~~';' " ,,::" -/: ,'",:'" .l~ I ';'" :.,', l,.~ :,'~;~'1-: , .'" , ,,:' ~" ' ":: ':;' ", ,':' ";'::: ',:..,:/",'; .' " :".
ATTACHMENT B
PINELLAS COUNTY
REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR REDEVELOPMENT PLANS/AMENDMENTS
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
TIuoughOlJt the procedure described b~low, it will be the responsibility of the Assistant County
Administrator for Planning and Development to monitor the status of the City's request(s) and keep
city representatives informed about the status of their request(s).
The County Attorney's Office will be responsible for reviewing any legislative changes to Chapter
163, Florida Statutcs and will advise the Director of Community Development if the review procedure
needs to modified as a result of new legislation.
1. City representatives request that the Board of County Commissioners 1) delegate the powers
and authority to conduct redevelopment activities to the City Commission/Council and 2)
authorize the City Commission/Council to act as the redevelopment agency for a certain
geographic area. City representatives forward eight copies to the County for review.
Typically. the City Manager sends this request to the County Administrator. The County
Administrator forwards the request to the Assistant County Administrator fot Planning anG
Development. The Assistant County Administrator coordinates the following review by the
Planning Department and the County Attorney.
County Altorney reviews conceptual plan to determine if consistent with state slHtutes and
with Board policy regarding redevelopment and renewal. and prepares the necessary legal
documents. The Planning Department reviews the redevelopment plan boundaries to
determine if they are reasonable.
The Assistant County Administrator for Planning and Development forwards courtesy copies
of the City's request to the Assistant County Administrator for r..,1anagement and Budget, the
Property Appraiser, the Director of the Community Development Departmenl and the
Executive Director of the Pinellas Planning Council.
If the City intends to utilize tax increment financing, a redevelopment trust fund must be
established (see step 6). To establish a redevelopment trust fund. the City must submit a list
of parcel numbers for the property that will be included in the redevelopment area. A legal
description of the redevelopment area boundaries is not sul'ticienl. The purpose of this
requirement is to clearly identify which property will be subject to tax increment linancing.
The Property Appraiser marks the parcels in a temporary computer tile and can provide the
City with information on property values in the redevelopment area for planning purposes.
If the City intends to utilize lax increment tinancing in the immediate future, the City should
contact the Property Appraiser's office for assistance in idenlilying the appropriate parcels
prior to requesting authority to conduct redevelopment activities.
It is anticipated that step one will take approximately three weeks from the time the City
formally requests redevelopment authority. If clarification regarding the legal description for
lhe redevelopment trust fund is necessary. the request for redevelopment authority will be
postponed until the list of parcel numbers is finalized.
2. The City prepares a proposed community redevelopment plan. pursuant to Chapter 163.
Florida Statutes.
3. City representatives request the Board of County Commissioners, 1) approve the
redevelopment plan and any amendments; and mayor may not request at this time thallhe
Board 2) establish a redevelopment trust fund. Eight sets pf the plan/amendment are
required.
-Continued-
..:':.. ~
~e;x~~, ~..>;.r...}x,:.:.:t~:\:'.y::;".'}~/~~".E~;)'.~~)" ~\/;:'t~:~)>,;'Ft:~~::',;i>[r.{:\::..:/.':"
4. The County Administrator!s Office distributes the plan/amendment to the County Attorney's
Office. the Assistant C.()~nty Administrator for Management and Budget. the Property
Appraiser, the Director of the Planning Department and the Director of the Community
Development Department. requesting comments within three weeks. Two copies are sent to
the Planning Department for review by the Planning Division and the Transportation
Planning Division.
The County Attorney reviews Chapter 163. Rorida Statutes for any recent legislative changes
Hnd prepares the necessary legal documents.
"
The Assistant County Administrator for Management and Budget reviews the redevelopment
plan/amendment for its fiscal implications and sends comments to the Assistant County
Administrator for Planning and Development within three weeks.
The Community Development Department reviews the redevelopment plan/amendment,
including the provisions for an equitable and reasonable relocation policy as required in the
Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan (1.6.8) and forwards comments Lo the Planning
Department within three weeks. TIle Planning Department reviews the redevelopment
plan/amendment for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. including intergovernmental
coordination. The Planning Department compiles its comments. as well as Community
Development's, in repon form and forwards it to the A~sistant County Administrator for
Planning and Development. The nature of the comments dictate whether consultation with,
city representatives is needed.
The Assistant County Administrator for Planning and Development forwards a courtesy copy
to the Pinellas Planning Council so that they have advance notice of redevelopment districts
under consideration.
5. The Assistant County Administrator for Plllnning and Development coordinates any necessary
discussion with city representatives. After departmental comments have been received and
any necessary discussion with city representatives has been held, the County Administrator's
Office requests a Board of County Commissioners puhlic hearing.
6. The Board of County Commissioners approves the redevelopment plan by resolution and
conducts the public hearing to consider approval of the redevelopment trust fund by
ordinance. The approval of the redevelopment plan and establishment of the redevelopment
trust fund can occur at the same time or different times. However. the redevelopment plan
must be npproved by the Board prior to its taking action on the trust fund.
Typically, steps three through six will take six to twelve weeks to complete depending on the,
scope and content of the redevelopment plan. including its land use implications. and if
discussion with city representatives is necessary.
7. After the Board of County Commissioners public hearing. city representatives may forward
the proposed redevelopment plan and amendments to the Pinellas Planning Council if the,
plan/amendment involves consideration of. or changes to. a special land use designation on
the countywide future land use plnn.
8. When the city identifies its base year for tax increment financing. city representatives contact
the Property Appraiser to tinalize the identification of parcels in the redevelopment area.
The Property Appraiser identities these parcels with a new tax code. Each year. the Property
Appraiser provides the County Administrator and the City Finance Director with information
on the taxable value of property in the redevelopment area.
1/24192
'1 .; , ; _I.'. " I ~ . v,' I . . ,1- { , ,I .. ',..,'.1, 't ' . \ : I' I '\ ~,' -.' , (, . \ ~ I' I.;. \' J) , ;':, {' t " ," ".: " ~I ~."",
A TIACIIMENT I
C01\1MUNIn' REDEVELOPMENT AREAS IN PINELLAS COUNlY
City Area' Date, Board of County . Description
Approved Commissioners
Action
Clea:-water Downtown 04/16/86 Ordinance 86-14 Approved project schedule
& created trust fund.
, 10/26/82 Resolution 82-34 Delegated redevelopment
authority to city officials.
Dunedin Downtown 12(20/88 Ordinance 88-67 Approved project schedule
&. created trust fund.
04/12/88 Resolution 88-128 Delegated redevelopment
authority to city officials.
Pinellas Park 09n.5190 Ordinance 90-78 Created trust fund.
09/25190 Resolution 90-370 Approved redevelopment
plan.
11(22/88 Resolution 88-469 Delegated redevelopment
authority to city officials.
St. Petersburg Intown 01/31/91 Ordinance 91-7 Created trust fund for
Intown West.
12/04/90 Resolution 90-446 Approved'Intown West
Redevelopment Plan.
05/15190 Resolution 90-180 Approved amendment
expanding redevelopment
area to include Intown West.
04/30186 Ordinance 86-39 Approved project schedule
& created trust fund.
08/30/82 Resolution 82-24 Delegated redevelopment
authority to city officials.
St. Petersburg Bayboro Harbor 12(25/88 Ordinance 88-45 Approved project schedule
& created tr~~t fund.
05/16/85 Resolution 85-284 Delegated redevelopment
authority to city officials.
S1. Petersburg Central Plaza 05/14/85 Resolution 85-285 Delegated redevelopment
authority to city officials.
St. Petersburg 16th Street South 07/13182 Resolution 82-353 Delegated redevelopment
Commercial authority to city officials.
Revitalization
St. Petersburg Jamestown 1974 Not Applicable Designated redevelopment
area; prior to home rule;
county approval not
required. .
01f23/92~CCR/cn
/:;', '- '-', // "',;:';', ;'J ,", :, ~,~~ ;"~\:};Y':' '.' 'X::' ':<;:/';:', '~""~:{<;:,,,}: ~ "~"'~ ,?:,; .I,::~r,';.,,'} ,',':~ ,j,' >;'/':~; .:";
", _, ' " ' I ", ,. . " ' , >"/"\" " ... ,:> . -, ,\ " --.. _ \\.., ""1' ,,' I" '.
~l , ',,' " ',~'. . ..'" ,. ,'", ~'i'.\ .~,:..~~--:.._:",:,l."'t ~'" I ....';\.'~. ..,~ "'. ~ ,.,.;...." ".j;"'-...."
ATTACHMENT C
EXPANSION AREAS
An analysis of real estate values, lot configurations, street layout, other public service provision,
crime statistics, and the internal land use relationships in and around Downtown Clearwater reveals
the need to expand the Downtown eRA District in four areas. These expansion areas are described
below.
EXPANSION AREA 1 - NORTH BAYFRONT
Expansion Area 1 consists of area generally bounded by Clearwater Harbor on the west, Nicholson
and Maple Streets on the north, the Pine lias Trail and 1\1yrtle Avenue on the east and Jones Street on
the south. This area includes a wide variety of residential, commercial and industrial land uses.
Street layouts and lot widths are substandard across much of this area, and crime rates are above
the City average. Numerous deteriorated and dilapidated structures exist in this area.
E)<pansion Area 1 is an important component of this Downtown Plan because it presents the
opportunity to establish a revitalized mixed use (residential and office) area in the northern part of
Downtown. A rezoning study scheduled for 1992 by the City of Clearwater Planning and
Development Department will address other land use issues on the northern and eastern peripheries
of this expansion area.
EXPANSION AREA 2 - NORTH CORRIDOR
This expansion area consists of a relatively small area bounded by an unnamed alley west of Booth
Avenue on the west, Drew Street on the north, Greenwood Avenue on the east, and Grove Street on
the south. It contains a mixture of small scale land uses (primarily residential). Street layouts and
lot sizes are substandard in much of this area; crime rates are above the City average. There are
several deteriorated and dilapidated structures in this area.
Expansion Area 2 is important to the Downtown Plan because of its location along the north-central
edge of the Downtown. This location, near small offices and single family residential uses, makes
inclusion of this area in the Downtown necessary so that uses in this area can be carefully
controlled. This will help the Downtown to be a "good neighbor" to the surrounding neighborhood.
EXPANSION AREA 3 - SOUTH CORE
Expansion Area 3 consists of area generally bounded by Ft. Harrison Avenue on the west, the
existing eRA Plan southern boundary on the north, East Avenue on the east and Druid Road on the
south. The area contains a mixture of commercial, residential and office land uses. Lot and street
layouts in this area are substandard.
Expansion Area 3 is an important component of this Downtown Plan because it presents the
opportunity to establish a revitalized mixed use (residential and office) area in the southern part of
Downtown Clearwater.
, .
': ~ ~.. :", '~:..', \ ","; ,< .~'~ ,'", --:" ':, ~,', /,', .., "; "~' ':~' ",,:' ~::' ;'.:,' ".'.".~, ,/;, ,~("~,,,,/~,.. ,',,',',", ',- ',/, ': ,'" ~ "", < ,\;, ,~,:;,', ,::, ..'.. ...,'.:.' .,."
I , "l.....)., "''1'"'''' ',- \ "',, , 'I: ~' . , ," I ,( " \ ,,! " I" ',', I \ . , ". \' '<; ,
. ' '~''''';'~''''':> ,I'I'~'"t' y. .'1:. '".' :~/.,r',.~.\:..t~, /'~'\: .... ..-11,'" J.' '" ),...'.:..';~.\.., <l........ 'I" j.,.':,..<.., ',"", '\, : .,..'.. \ ". '~..' ;', ...."\.J'J '/.......'. .....:.
, ,'._ "', ' " " "~ /' -:' /'\'\ ",' ,\,' " ..~",'t>,'"'''' \', '_"'" \', '.. \ " "... ", '\,' ) , . 0-'./.
..' ... ~/11 :.." " ~.- ," J,..'. "\. '~." "~I.: I. . ,/ ,~~ ..' ,". .-. 'y"" .'..,... "l'"
I , . \ ,..' ~,.' r, l ' , . \ " " . ,. ' I
"., .
, ,
. , ' ~ . .. "
.""" '
EXPANSION AREA 4 - SOUTH CORRIDOR
This expansion area consists of an area directly to the south of the 1985 eRA Plan boundaries. It is
an irregular-shaped area generally bounded by Ewing and Washington Avenues on the west, Gould,
Pierce and Cleveland Streets on the north, Missouri Avenue on the east, and the rear property
boundaries of properties generally fronting on the south side of Court Street on the south. This area
includes a wide variety of residential, commercial and industrial land uses. Street layouts and lot
widths are substandard across much of this area, and crime rates are above the City average.
Numerous deteriorated and dilapidated structures exist in this area.
Expansion Area 4 is an important component of this Downtown Plan because it contains property to
be utilized for the East End Project, as well as areas suitable for mixed use (residential/office)
development.
i::'
'f.' ~
If
?';',
.l(;
i?
, ~ , . ~
" , " , , " y \ .' 'I, ';" ,..-"', ',' -:'" "j,," <:'. 1 \., ....,",',
i':.'~,' ", ~ '",' '/ \" ""'1:1:~. ',' ",;'. " \'" ,\' /', ,,", /' ..' ' '-"I "','<'" >, "'-. ,,'
. I ~. ,\ . ,. / . ~. I'.. . "~ \ '. . ' ,I I , I . I', . f \", I I' ,'. .~ '" \ .
' \ ' / - I . \' \ 'I I' ~ " I \ . '. '\ ' I ,
~ .... , ." ( I';... I - . , ( , '. . , ' ...... 'l ",,'.\ . .... .' -, ' \ .' ~ .,' . " "';f... ',~. / \.'/,,:', . ' \ ., \ . . I
'_"."\. '.'. ,/ ',' . ...,,\ ..,':'f.... .'"".
-- ,,/' . , , ,,' I ' I. '. .( ~ / , '".,' '~ . _ .~.' \ ' . '. I . '" .., /" . ' ~ '. I,' 4Q
" " ., . .' ',' ',' ~ 1 -l.', ':l ~ ~'_""'" ,~ ~"'.. .' ',' . " ..... _..
:,,';,
.\'
,~~; .;.
TAXABLE VALUATIONS - 1991
PROPOSED DOWNTOWN EXPANSION AREAS
EXPABSION AREA
EXPANSION AREA 1 - NORTH
BAY FRONT
- UC(B) SUBAREA
- UC(C) SUBAREA
- 'fOTAL
EXPANSION AREA 2 - NORTH
CORRIDOR
EXPANSION AREA 3 - SOUTH CORE
EXPANSION AREA 4 - SOUTH
CORRIDOR
TOTAL FOR ALL EXPANSION AREAS
1991 TAXABLE VALUATION
$10,704,600
6,384,800
$17,099,400
$1,132,500
$6,768,400
$10,779,000
$37,769,300