02-26-1990
. :'h
., , "
, .,
..: '.' ,.r
. -:'./
Agenda/C
2-26-90
000 (p
..,'::' ....
./. . ;;, ,
.'U,:<: ."
.
--...
..
.
.!,j....,.:,..... ....,
.. .: ....;.....'.:. ...
:.:\.",>.,,":'.i..,\'
, . .
CXHIJNITY REDE.VEIDFMFNr AGEX:Y
~
Regular Meeting
Monday, February 26, 1990, 9:00 AM.
Commission Conference Room
I. Approval of the Minutes of March 23, 1989 Meeting
II. Approval of the Minutes of OCtober 10, 1989 Meeting
CRA and DDS Joint Meeting
III. Approval of the Minutes of November 2, 1989 Meeting
IV. Approval of the Minutes of November 6, 1989 Meeting
v. RFP for l1arket Assessment.......................... .Michael Wright
Asst. City ManagerjComnunity Services
Jerry D. sternstein
~conomic Development Director
VT. Enterprise Zone Boundary Change Approval... ....Jerry D. sternstein
Economic Development Director
"~"'~~'" MR" ," ;_...._.;. .".I._'.~ T. . .~. ..... .;,' 11"~' ,:... "" ..-'_" ".':~~- ~ '. .,', '.'1
,'III 1111111111111111111'111111111111111111111111111111111~1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111!11111111111111111111111111 III
e M' EMORANDUM 0.' Agenda No. ~
:: T . Me e tin 0 ate: 2/26/90 ~
- -
- -
- -
.- -
.5 THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ~
i_ -
.- -
.- -
~s SUB J E C T : RFP - Market Assessman t 5
- -
- -
- -
.- -
SE ' RECOMMENDATION: 5
- -
.- -
- -
- -
:: Approve the issuance of a Request for Proposal to conduct a Market Assessment for ::
== DJwntONn Clearwater. =
- -
- -
- -
.- -
.- -
- -
E G And. that th. appropriate offlclale be authorized to execute .ame. ::
;- -
:- -
= BACKGROUND: ::
'- -
- -
,- -
.- -
.- -
= An up to date market assessment dealing with supply, demand and related problems is =
E: a key component in Clearwater's dONntown revitalization effort. ::
- -
-' -
- -
:: A well-designed and competently executed assessment can help define downtown ::
:: development potential and foc~s on other real or perceived problems such as parking, ::
:: traffic circulation and policy restrictions which might impede the progress of' ::
= revitalization. =
- -
- -
- -
- -
:: An impartial, professionally done assessment can make the revitalization process ::
:= Irore rational by either affirming, rejecting or modifying potential City initiatives ::
= thereby focl,lsing efforts toward the more viable development alternatives. =
= -
- -,
~- -
== The assessment will also serve as a policy framework to justify' the input of City ::
.= inducements necessary to foster development. In this sense, the City can define the ::
:: role it is prepared to play in pursuit of development while at the same time gain an ::
:: understanding of what the development coomunity expects or needs to make a pr;oject ::
:: work. 'When the City deals with a developer, the interaction will take place within ::
:: an ordered framework. We can be assured that our data and the data generated by the ::
:: developer will be consistent. Development scenarios can be exchanged efficiently ::
= and the negotiation process will be expedited. =
- -
- -
- -
- -
= The modest costs required to conduct the market appraisal will be more than offset =
- -
= by the logical ordering of the City's priorities and financial resources. =
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
= RodeY.lopment Agency Dhpoaltlona Follow-up Actloew: =
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
:: Submitted by: Adyertla.d: Cl AUected Coate: ~ Attachment.: E
:: Parties Funding Source: :
_ Date: -
= 'l'1/A Notified t::I Capital Improy.- IlFP :
- -
= aper: of Me.tlng mont Budget :
- -
= Executlye Director :
_ Cl Operetlng Budget -
= CJ Hot Requlr~d tJilHot Requlro :
= CJ Other :
- .-
= Originating Department: :
- -
- D t . S tl I ~ Appropriation Code -
:: a a equan e EconoJ1~ic Development CJ'AP i~lA :
= Rat.rance CJ None :
III1I1II1I11I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111!!11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111lll1lllll1llj
02/13/90
Request for Proposal
RFPI
Consulting Services for Ibwntcxm Market Assessnent
Scope of Services
The City of Clearwater, Florida requires the services of a professional
consulting firm proficient in market analysis and development to study and
make recommendations relevant to supply, demand and market potentials for
retail, o~fice/cornmercial, residential and entertainment/rostaurant
facilities.
The assessment should clearly and quantifiably document the current market
supply and detail the types and sizes of commercial/office, retail, food and
entertainment establishments and residential accommodations that can be
attracted to and supported by the downtown Clearwater market.
The market assessment should not only analyze past trends, future projections
and supply-demand ratios, it should also identify development opportunities
and suggest a market strategy that outlines what the City can do to stimulate
development and the costs/benefits of such actions. A desired goal is the
creative translation of identified market potentials into viable project
concepts with strong investor-developer appeal. (See Attachment C)
While the emphasis of the market assessment is focused upon the downtown, it
is important that an area-wide perspective be considered. The potential
growth limits of the area and the inter-relationships between the downtown and
broader, secondary market must be recognized.
The assessment should specify and analyze problem areas such as access tu and
through the downtown, parking availability and regulatory and public policy
constraints including concurrency and other Florida growth management
requirements that impact upon development.
The consultant will be expected to gather and assimilate background mater.ials
relevant to the downtown market. The consultant will be given information
generated from a recently completed pinellas County commute zone/labor draw
study done under the auspices of the pinellas Economic Development Council.
Other relevant data are expected to be generated fram a Conference/Convention
Center study which will be underway and from the January 1990 Greater
Clearwater Area strategic Transportation Plan prepared for the Florida
Deparbment of Transportation, District 7.
Attachments A through F of this Request for Proposal are included for
informational purposes only. They are not meant to restrict or constrain tho
consultant's response, approach or methodology.
Attachment A - Typical Elements: Demographics For Market Analysis of
Office/Commercial, Retail, Residential, Food and
Entertainment
Attachment B - Typical Elements of Retail Component for Downtown Market
Study
Attachment C - Typical Elements: Downtown Development Strategies
Attachment D - Typical Elements of Traffic/Parking Analysis
Attachment E - Map
Attachment F - Newspaper Articles for Background Reference
(1 )
. ' ,~ ,'.. .. : J " '. '" P, '.. .: '. .....'.., . ., ". , . " ...... . .
..
i
~
~
...
1
I
i
1
i
1.
,
~
Instructions for _~~ tt:i~ Rasponso
Each respondent will be responsible for the approach and methodology of their
proposals. At a minimum, each proposal must contain the following
infonnation:
1. Qualifications
a.
Name of responding firm or firms, business street address,
business mailing address, telephone number.
b. The legal organizational establishment of the responding finn or
firms (Co~ration, Partnership, etc.)
c. Name of principals of the responding organization(s) (Corporate
Officer, Partners).
d. Previously completed studies and reports done by the finn with
emphasis on work done in Florida during the past 3-5 years with
cities of comparable size to Clearwater. Indicate the number of
assignments currently underway. The fion should demonstrate
extensive private sector experience.
e. A list of client references for wham similar studies have been
conducted. The list should include a name, address and telephone
number.
2. Technical Proposal
a. When the work can commence and the length of time required to
complete the entire market analysis?
b. Methodology to be used in undertaking the analysis.
c. Identification and qualifications of staff to be assigned to the
project.
d. Whether any information and/or statistical data will be required
from the City and, if so, the nature of the material?
e. Other relevant information supporting the proposal - brochures,
photographs, etc.
3. Fee Proposal
a. A time and cost breakdown by Scope of Services work element(s) and
designation of staff to be responsible for specific elements. It
is essential that the City understand the specific costs, expected
products and time frame for each of the groups of tasks as well as
for the project as a whole.
b. Provisions for briefings and/or public presentations during the
course of the work and at its conclusion.
c. An explanation of any special conditions or tet1llS that might apply
to the work should be detailed.
( 2)
I
I
I
TIMETABIE
The RFP will be distributed on
.
I
L
!
Respondents will be given an opportunity to consult with City of Clearwater
staff. Questions should be directed to:
George McKibben
Purchasing Manager
City of Clearwater
P.o. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618
(813) 462-6860
Questions may be asked up to two weeks prior to the submission of the
proposals ( ) .
~
SUBMISSlOO OF PROPCEALS
TWelve (12) copies of each respondent's proposal must be submitted to the
Purchasing Division in either the enclosed envelope or sent to the address on
the envelope by , at 11:00 a.m.
date
Any proposals received after the submission deadline will not be considered.
It is the sole responsibility of the respondent to have his proposal delivered
to the above address for receipt on or before the required date.
The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and/or all proposals, to
waive irregularities and technicalities, and to negotiate modifications that
may be in the City's best interest.
Proposals will be opened at time and date shown above at
Address
Sl.Mo1ARY CF mTES AND TIMES
RFP Distributed
Questions/Clarifications
RFP Submission Deadline
Prop03als Opened
(3)
. .
>."", " ", ' ',::' ,', ;::, <' ,':: : ',',:, ,,:, " ,::~'::: ::, ,:.:: , '~,<' '''<'':::.'. :: ;-' ,,' ,,", '/" :: '::
.. " ," , ~ '. '.' -. . , . '. . .. ., , .'.
.:.~ ':
Attacl1roont. A
'lYPical EleuEnts: DemJgraphics For IlJwntown Market Assessaent
of Office/CaJmercial, *Retail, Residential, Food and Entertainnent
Demographic/economic overview - all demographics based on most recent data
with computer simulation to approxLnate current and projected populations and
demographic trends.
- Population City & SMSA
- Ethnic
- Household
- Incane/Net Worth/Disposable Income
- Employment (labor statistics and labor trends)
Downtown Office Market Analysis and Potentials
Estimated downtown daytime population
Estbnated downtown evening population
Office census - Class A**, B*** & C*** space
- DcJNntown
- Secondary or outlying areas
Vacancy/Absorption/Capture rates by category
Competitive supply and demand
Future Projections
Food/Entertainment/Hotel:
- existing supply
- supportable demand type (capture rates by category)
Residential Market Analysis
Competitive supply
Supportable demand by category type housing:
- Single Family
- Town Houses
- Apartments
High-rise
Low-rise
- Moderate Income Housing
Impact of expanded office market on residential housing
Executi ve Sumnary for:
- Retail - entertainment - restaurant - hotel
- Office/Commercial
- Housing availability within 6 mile radius (type, price range) to house
downtown workers
- Recanmendations as to housing to be developed in downtONn core
~velopment Pol icy, Growth Management Problems and other relevant issues
* Retail (see Attachment B)
** Class A Definition - Functionally modern, usually less than 20 years old,
high quality construction and finish, good condition.
***Class B/C Definition - Often more than 20 years old, design or condition
could cause functional problems.
(4 )
:'.,' · ,;;' ' :':i ,:.:: .' .: L" ':', ' ,0: >, .,'~..,:i::': i :. :" :'L. ."', ::.',': .' 'q;:..... ",' . ',.: .,;".,..,
.. "'_. ,. ." . . ' .. . . j """ . , . . '. '.. ., ,. o. _', ,0' ~
Attacl1nent B
TYPICAL EI>>fENI'S OF RETAIL CCJnlCMNr FOR
~ MARKET ASSESSMENr
The proposed market assessment will contain a retail canponent. This element
will assess the existing mix of stores and merchandise (supply) found in the
dCMntown (eRA) area and detennine consumer (demand) preferences.
The most praninent factors to be researched are:
1 ) The trade area
-Geographic extent of the prunary and secondary trade areas
2) Buy ing p::>wer of relevant conswners
3) The nature of the canpetition
4) Market--econanic conditions, retailing trends and their expected
impact on the area
5) Downtown accessibility, traffic flaw, parking, visibility
The retail canponent of the study will examine the current status of retail
activity in the downtown CRA. area. Fran this point of departure, the trade
area, or the geographic area fran which the major [X>rtion of the probable
clientele group will be drawn, will be defined and analyzed.
It can be assumed that an area of approximately one (1) to six (6) miles will
consti tute the prima!"'.! trade area. The secondary and/or fringe trade area
will be defined by the market assessment.
Demographic research and analysis will be required in order to rationally
profile both the trade areas and the potential clientele groups. For example,
buying power is contingent upon demographic information on income levels and
disposable income for various retail categories. Basically, new retail can be
expected to draw clientele fran new population gravth (seasonal or other),
from existing stores and fran unique specialty operations not currently
represented in the prevailing retail mix.
The last factor- destination specialty retail- is critical to the success of
a new retail venture. Festival marketplaces have been skillful in developing
and exploiting this synergy mix which draws clientele to a shopping area.
Sane retail developments achieve this dynamic mix from small to mid-sized
specialty operations, while others use major anchor operations in tandem with
the specialty operations.
In analyzing the existing competition which is within the primary and fringe
trade area radii, some of the following elements should be considered:
1) :ypes of stores at nearby malls and strip centers
(5)
." .;~.. .:. ;,~."., ... ;....,::"..,..:.. ;;.,:..:..: .:;:'.,.~.~. .,:'~. ..,'.; :;;,:::.";;':; ....,.... ::.:~.: : :' '.. .........:. :./~:. ..--0,. . ,: .'J...i. .~.,. ,.' .:'.. :'; ',. '.\ <'
2) Shopper characteristics of those who frequent the centers:
a) male/female
b) age range
c) maan age
d) incane range:
disposable income
grCMth in disposable income
e) mean household income
f) children under age 18 at heme
g) race
h) employed male
i) employed female
3) Frequency of shopping visits
a) purpose of visit
b) which demographic incane groups are most frequent
shoppers
and which are least frequent
c) which retail categories consume the most dollars and in
what specific stores
d) what is the percent of shared traffic among anchor and
other stores
e) how much time is spent at the various centers and for
what
purpose: general shopping, brCMsing, special events,
etc.
4) Sales contribution data compares the percentage of shoppers
with the percentage of center sales estimated to come from
that particular group of shoppers. For example:
Shopper Group
Females
Persons 22-54
Persons 65+
Incane $25-34K
Incane 50K+
Persons in Household with
No Children
Whites
Managerial White-Collar
Male Blue-Collar
Female Blue-Collar
Female Homemaker
Retired Males
Retired Females
Mean Expenditure
$26.50
27.48
31.89
24.55
53.68
Sales Contribution
81%
78%
9%
24%
21%
25.50
24.93
38.55
26.67
36.32
26.07
25.00
24.00
50%
94%
32%
1%
15%
17%
16%
15%
( 6)
. ...... '.' .,~'. ;..... <,: :..,: ,C. /.':.~: ,'.';:': ~;,,;":~1;.. u:. .. '" ..... " ':.:. ..:,:'. )}..: ~ .. , . .;~'. . ,:: . ..' - .'.: ';'-
To recap, a well developed retail component of a downtown market study will
include an analysis of:
1) The trade and market area(s)
2) A market profile of the trade areas with growth projections based
upon current demographic information
3) Relative draw indices
4) Shopper characteristics for the various centers
male/female
age
incanc
race
employment
5) Shopper purposes
general shopping
brONsing
special events/prom0tions/etc.
6) Shopper frequency
which demo;;Jraphic groups shop most frequently and which less
frequently
For example:
Most frequent shoppers might be persons under 22 years of age,
white, with incomes of $15K to 35K.
7) Time spent at the centers
8) Stores patronized by category
9) Cross traffic
Comparisons can be made among the competing centers and these cornparisons can
be further analyzed by using "Benchmark" Reports which give a composite
profile of similar regional and national centers.
NOl'E: It should be emphasized that the market assessment will encanpass more
than a retail component. It will also evaluate and analyze developnent
opportunities for office, commercial, housing, entertainment, and restaurant
operations. It should identify and review problem areas such as major access
routes to and through the downtown, parking problems and regulatory and public
policy constraints that impact upon development.
(7)
. .
. .,
~ ~ r- .
".",, ~; >:'<,<: '~,>, ....:.,:.2.,).;"(,,,~Si(~' ,{"",,:q:i '. .:....,;::. Y..'. .:":.; ....
" . -. - ,: :. ~', ".
: :.".' ,:.~' ". ',: ," ..., ':,.. .~.
Attac1'l.lent C
TYPICAL El..F)!ENl"S: J:Xl'Hlati mvEIDPMENT S'J.'RA1'a;IES
Based upon demand, canpetitive market forecasts and the desirability and
availability of specific downtown. parcels, the consultant should suggest a
viable retail and/or mixed use development program.
After identifying potential areas of opportunity, the consultant should devise
various development scenarios. These should describe the overall development
concept and the specific elements for which rnarket support exists or could be
stimulated.
To test the practicality and viability of the proposed development a
preliminary financial analysis should be done. It should include estilnated
public and private development costs, pro forma income and expense
projections/analyses and public and private financing requirements and
sources. The financial analysis should be sufficient to permit the city and
potential developers/investors to evaluate the feasibility of the development
proposal. The analysis should be verified through review and comment from
major lenders and from national, regional and local participants.
Finally, the consultant should identify and evaluate potential developers,
investors, tenants and operators who would be well suited to the types of
projects recarunended.
No urban design input will be required.
I
I
~
!
!
( 8)
:' · '. .' ,.' .'. .' , '.' " ....;, ~': ;,:',i',".::' \<.....,.:' '. ';.,' ..' .:; " "':-""'" <.:' ,'.
'" .'~' ".v.'. . . . . . . ' ... " . '. ~ . . . .
-, .".......-
. .
Attaclloont D
~pical Eleroonts of lbwnt:.ct.m Traffictparki.rvJ Analysis
I. Inventory and Analysis
Park ng supply:
On-street spaces
Off-street lots, garages and spaces with map designating
locations
II. Parking U:;e Patterns
Occupancy rates
Turnl)ver
Dura-ion
III. Current S.lpply and Demand Relationships
Acce5S
Natu_e of parking to demand generators
Dete_ ine current net surplus or deficiency of spaces
IV. Managemen Pol ic ies
Rate structure overview
Time Limi ts
Rest ictions
V. Future Pa king Demand(s)
Shor term/long term
On-s reetjoff-street/garage
VI. OVerview f Major Circulation Arteries That Traverse Downtown
Func ional Class
Widt /number of lanes
Traf ic count
Traf ic control(s)
Acce-s to parking
prox' ity of parking generating uses.
VII. Recommend tions
Parking
Adequacy of downtown supply vs demand
Nature of downtown parking
Access as it correlates to perceived and/or real parking
shortages
Traffic Circulation
Evaluate major downtown traffic carriers
Cleveland Street
Drew Street
Fort Harrlson
Chestnut
Gulf-to-Bay*
*Information from the Florida Dept. of Transportation's Greater Clearwater
Area Strategi Transportation Plan - January, 1990 will be available as
reference.
(9)
. .
", ; ,,' ", ",. ",' ',' "., ." " , " . ~ '.'. ~ ,'::, .' .', .. .'.. ~':" , " ,," "H" " " .: '," "'. ',:" .'.
...~..:..."~.<."..:, ...., -, .'- \. ..'......, ..... '.,' ,.. ..- ,'- ,-. .".
_:0.' I..... " , ~J.'-" " ~'.'.,"
>-
t:
z
o
>
o
z
<
<
w
~
~<
w'"
...z
<w
~~
~4.
<9
ww
..J>
ow
c
UJ
~
>-
...
z
~
~
~
o
o
l-
V
i
l-
llS
Q
l-
X
III
:I
Go
o
...
III
> l/J
III C
Q III
III a:
II: C
~ Z
.. 0
z in
;:) z
:I c
:I Go
o ...
U III
o III
lI: ...
;: CD
III in
;c :g.
III A.
l ~
ATT ACHMENT E
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
.
..
~
..
~
..
..
..
..
..
co
,.
i
,.
..
. ...
. ..
, ..
o.
..
, 0
.. ..
..c
....
....
.. ..
of
.'
.
..
0:
;;
.
..
~
:1111111111111111111111111 fll' 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111' III
.5 M' EMORANDUM TO Agenda No. a
:3 :' M e e tin q 0 ate: 2/26/90 E
- -
- -
- -
- -
E THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ~
.- -
.- -
- -
.- -
!e SUB J E C T: Approved Enterprise Zone Boundary. Change 5
- -
- -
,- -
5 ' RECOMMENDATION: 5
- -
.- -
,- -
- -
- -
'= INFORNATION ITEt-t ONLY. =
- -
- . -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- - -
.- -
= CJ And. t hat I h e a p pro p r I ate 0 f f I c I. Ie be. u tho r I zed to. I e cut e .. me. ::
i_ -
j- -
= BACKGROUND: ::
- -
- -
.- -
- -
- -
= The Clean'later City Commission by Resolution 89-54 (10/19/89) approved boundary =
- -
= changes for the existing Enterprise Zone in order to make the boundaries more =
- -
= . consistent with the CRA boundaries. The Comnission directed City Staff pursue =
-= these changes with the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs. ::
- -
- -
- -
- ' -
= After making the appropriate submissions and application revisions, the State =
E granted final approval on February 5, 1990. (Letter attached) ==
- -
.- -
- -
= : =
.= =
-
- -
- -
- -
= -
- _.
.- -
- -
'- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
= Redevelopment Agency DI.po.ltlon: Follow.up Action: =
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
:: Submitted by: Advertl.ed: Cl Affocted COltl: None fSji Attachment.: E
- ~ -
E . 4:1( Date:. ::~~:::d Funding Source: Letter of Approval E
= .:-v -/Y" H / A Cl Cap It a I Imp r 0 v e - Map =
= Paper: of M..tlng ment Budget :
- -
= Executive Director ';/A'" :
_ j, . CJ Operating Budget .
2 0 Not Required DHot Required C] Othor ~
- ."
= Orlgln.llng Department: :
- ..
__- Date' Sequential Economic Devclopr.leJlt Appropriation Cod. ......
Il/A
= Ref.rence - 0 None :
- .
1I11111111111111111I1111111111111111111111111111111111!!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIJlllllllllllllllllllllllj
- '.. ' .' . ~ .', . " . - '. .. , ,.. , . ~ .: ~ . ~, t' l " ..'.
. ,.., ~ ~', r ',' f..
";".-<..\' '. ~"Ii.!-"'.!
.~. ;.... ,'-.
MEMORANDUM
..
i.
TO:
FROM:
COPIES:
Mayor & City Commission
Ron H. Rabun, Ci ty Ma nager.fJ 11-
Downtown Development Board; Michael Wright, Assistant City
Manager/Community Servi ces; Jerry Sternstei n, Economi c Development
Director
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Approval of Expandeu Enterprise Zone
February 21, 1990
The State of Florida has approved the City's application to expand the
enterpri se zone. Although on the surface it appears somewhat simple, there
was a great deal of staff work involved in meeting the State1s requirements.
Expansion of the enterprise zone is another brick in the foundation of
economic development efforts in the downtown and Greenwood area.
The attached map outlines the enterprise zone area.
att.
.' ,
::,: ,', c' .", . .'. . . ....~'. . .,. ': ',.'..'.. /. ~:' .. '.<'~> ',;..; ,,;. s: ):i,.~,. '.o. y _ .<~>\ ,,~', " ; ,_
. ~-" . '.' ,..,' ., /-. ,. '-. /.-.- :\~''':''/'. ., . -., . . .. .
~_ .-'-"-:.._~~ ~. \~. ,.' ,'," . ....-J ~\,... ' ,'......' . ", ;..~_.J .1, 4. ')
, ,
. sf. I. ~\ '- \'-
. J \;\...; ..... \ \ __,"--
...... , '- \ ~'. .. r-
: rr C:'. \:: '. '~~t \~_...j ,~14 ~,
\.... . v "
.~.... .
\ '.
.~
~,,\~<Lf~ ~::. -:
'u ,. 1'1~ ~~
~~, ~ ~ .#>
_ ..;~, "."Iill.-:.
, e ,~:>4~..,.~:.:
;; ~::- ,"If-.-;;z.;::.. .' ::
~ t.:,,,~.:.~. .ft'!/. ::
...... .;"--., -,:. ~. -
. .~ -#........... ~ .
.' ....:-. .Jtl,';'.
~:"') ~ ~", ,...
. ..
tD~~iES TO:
CG~I;IMISSION
PRESS
Ollte FEB 1 2 1990
C.ri CLERK
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2740 CENTERVIEW DRIVE. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399
BOB MARTINEZ
C~or
February 5, 1990
THOMAS G. PelHAM
Secretary
The Honorable Rita Garvey
Mayor, city of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 346~8-4748
Dear Mayor Garvey:
The Department of Community Affairs has concluded its review
of the applications submitted for changes in existing boundaries
under the state of Florida's Enterprise Zone Program, pursuant to
Section 290.0055, F.S. It gives me great pleasure to inform you
that the boundary changes designated by your local government
have been approved. The City of Clearwater's new enterprise zone
number is 530S-1C90.
Beginning January 1, 1990, qualified businesses located in
areas added to your enterprise zone will be eligible for the
state incentives listed in Section 290.007, F.S., and local
incentives listed in your local government resolution.
Businesses located in areas deleted from your enterprise zone
will only be eligible to claim the enterprise zone state
incentives for which all eligibility requirements have been met
prior to January 1, 1990. Information regarding businesses no
longer eligible to claim benefits should be obtained from the
Florida Department of Revenue.
Should you have any other questions or require additional
information, please call Ms. Rosa M. Morgan, Administrator, at
(904) 488-3581.
j~ (jJ~
Sincerely yours,
Thomas G. Pelham
Secretary
TGP/bbc
cc: Mr. Jerry D. sternstein
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
'~~JTIl"l
[ ~
C~Q~~-l5 (
] [LO~IO(jE ST
,--- ---==::J .-.--.:::::.---'"
~ 'j;[Ji()O l
a:
~ ~D~OID~
D mo l]!U
1 D(j~O"EDsT ;
I
I '0 D,;:D[]~ u,L ] 5J~[s
w ~ -3 ;:j ;.. PARK a::
DUJD> 2 0 '1"--'~D ...
> <t '--::-;----.. J.. yo t.n
... ~ PIE R C EST = - pi f. R C. [ ....?.2..~ ~ ~ PIE I
g Dgnill~D~ 7.>r~;J~.[~~uG
J.,l ~ D ;2l'~ 9 ,:=J "l ~LtkJ~ " j ~~~~~ir~r.~
r/ ~ ~u 1 . I O. UJ~UJ ~I J I Ja: SJI'JTJI RD r.
~ <1 0"'..' Y :; l:> -!iROWrI e: L L 5 T --.:..:..:; 5
~ <r . _ Co I I r I ~V> _
RDG[DR,~ ro~ D~DCH[:~~~~RS' 5,5T 0;: ,IJIiT"-..s,r._" , , ,_....- '....',1 S.R 6511 cE.'
_ ~ 0 0: v p~~ns 5 T
( .~ . T\Jnr,[r:~ 51 ; ~ T.)"R-;;(. r,T LJ -- C:=J C~
Ii ~O"D!O~~~D i~' DID~C--~ lJ ~:J [1TU~~'J:,: ST
SrrlTTl5~ ,- r(ll-::; r",r ST r - ~[r-' ~[___.] ["!...'.J~--~J' I'\. <-;-, o~_ ~o L-:";" 'J..
,,0,oTo:.)0- \ - ':-'J ~D ~O'. (11!::CIM[e'..'}~.!.-/I I '\. .
''.j /"'~ :~_~ ~ ;:,~, ~CJ ___.-J ::h ____ ._, r;-" _, l _ '=-'::J ~ _______ _ ~\_ of>
'~OITI~ II... - . . 1- Q,<lJIQ no^o r
."r.nnrJ 1 ~r-'u_--, "., '.,rr,- , ,---, "----, ,-, r --, '----1 ,-, f'- ..'1 ...,-\'-'-(. -."1 r.~r I
rz 5305- I C90
OLD 130UN()M~ I ES "..".
NEW 130UNO^R I ES ~h":
N
~
~
~
~
~
t
/;
SJlN OY
r AIR MON
PA R K W (
W00081
SPRltjliO
E NGIJIl"
I- \
.J
0
:r
T 0
...
,.
...
w
:-
-,
o
..
'"
z
z
o
V>
a
...
:l!
Ie
VI
..
~
z