Loading...
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS NPDES PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ! PINELLAS COUNTY GOVERNMENT IS COMMITTED TO PROGRESSIVE PUBLIC POLICY, SUPERIOR PUBLIC SERVICE, COURTEOUS PUBLIC CONTACT, JUDICIOUS EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY AND SOUND MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC RESOURCES, TO MEET THE NEEDS AND CONCERNS OF OUR CITIZENS TODA Y AND TOMORROW Pinelldsl~ (ounty'f FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERlOCAl AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINEllAS COUNTY AND ITS NPDES PERMIT FlS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM AGREEMENT PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIVISION JUNE 2008 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS NPDES PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT, is entered into on the day of 2008, between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of Pinellas County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, and the Cities of Pinellas County, including the Town of Belleair, City of Belleair Beach, City of Belleair Bluffs, City of Clearwater, City of Dunedin, Town of Kenneth City, City of Gulfport, City of Indian Rocks Beach, City of Largo, City of Madeira Beach, Town of North Redington Beach, City of Oldsmar, City of Pinellas Park, Town of Redington Beach, Town of Redington Shores, City of St. Pete Beach, City of Safety Harbor, City of Seminole, City of South Pasadena, City of Tarpon Springs, City of Treasure Island, all of which are municipal corporations of the State of Florida and co- permittees to Pinellas County in its National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES) permit, hereinafter referred to as CO-PERMITTEES. WITNESSETH, That: WHEREAS, the COUNTY and CO-PERMITTEES entered into an agreement dated April 1 th, 2003 providing for the design and implementation of a water quality monitoring program that will be consistent with, and in support of, the requirements of NPDES permit #FLS000005. Except as hereby modified, amended or changed, all of the terms and conditions of said original Agreement dated April 1 th, 2003, will remain in full force and effect. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereafter set forth, the parties hereto mutually agree to amend the original Agreement, dated April 1 th, 2003 as follows: Page 2 of 16 SECTION 3, GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES is amended as follows: 2. Monitorina Proaram Implementation. Operation and Maintenance C. The COUNTY will continue to operate and maintain the sampling program outlined in Exhibit A using COUNTY staff and equipment. The program will consist of: . . . . . . . . . . managing staff maintaining equipment and instruments in working order ordering supplies and calibration standards performing necessary field quality assurance protocols in accordance with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) guidelines collection of samples coordinating sample delivery to a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) certified analytical laboratory reviewing and managing analytical data results entering data into the state database as required by FDEP reporting of data results to FDEP in accordance with NPDES permit requirements include a reference to each CO-PERMITTEE listed in this agreement as a contributor to a countywide monitoring program in monitoring results submitted to FDEP as required by NPDES permit FL000005; and · reporting of raw data results to the FDOT and the CO-PERMITEES every calendar year SECTION 4, COST ALLOCATION is amended as follows: 2. Monitorina Proaram Implementation. Operation and Maintenance A. The CO-PERMITTEES and the COUNTY shall share the actual annual cost of the water quality monitoring program. Costs shall be paid by each CO- PERMITTEE and the COUNTY on a pro-rata basis based upon jurisdictional acreage figures provided by the Pinellas County Planning Department. Acreage figures for the COUNTY and each CO-PERMITTEE are set forth in Exhibit "B." The acreage figures presented in Exhibit "B" are the most recent acreage figures available at the time this Amendment is being executed and shall remain in effect for the duration of this agreement term. In addition, costs will be shared in accordance with the terms shown in Exhibit "C." Page 3 of 16 SECTION 6, NOTICES is replaced by the following: All written notices to THE CO-PERMITTEES and the COUNTY under this agreement shall be directed to the following addresses: Pinellas County: Kelli Hammer Levy Pinellas County Dept. of Environmental Management 300 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Belleair: Robin Zimmerman Superintendent 901 Ponce De Leon Blvd. Belleair, FL 33756-1096 Belleair Bluffs: Mr. Robert David City of Belleair Bluffs 2747 Sunset Blvd. Belleair Bluffs, FL 33770 City of Belleair Beach: Peter Cavalli, MPA Director of Community Services and Information Technology City of Belleair Beach 444 Causeway Boulevard, Belleair Beach, Florida 33786 Clearwater: Mr. Brett Gardner Public Works Administration City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dunedin: Mr. Keith Fogarty Director of Maintenance City of Dunedin 750 Milwaukee Avenue Dunedin, FL 34698 Gulport: Mr. Don Sopak City of Gulfport 2401-53rd St. South Gulfport, FL 33707 Indian Rocks Beach: Mr. Dean Scharmen Public Services Director City of Indian Rocks Beach 1507 Bay Palm Blvd. Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785-2899 Larao: Mr. Mike Sepessy Stormwater Program Coordinator City of Largo P.O. Box 296 Largo, FL 33779-0296 Kenneth City: Mr. John Dutton Director of Public Works Town of Kenneth City 6000 54th Ave. N. Kenneth City, FL 33709-1800 N. RedinQton Beach: Ms. Mari Campbell Town Clerk Town of N. Redington Beach 190 173rd Avenue North Redington Beach, FL 33708-1397 Madeira Beach: Mr. Michael Maxemow Public Works Director City of Madeira Beach 300 Municipal Drive Madeira Beach, FL 33708-1996 Page 4 of 16 Pinellas Park: Mr. RandalA. Roberts Streets & Drainage Division City of Pinellas Park 6051 78th Ave. N. Pinellas Park, FL 33781 Town of Redinaton Shores: Ms. Mary Palmer Town Clerk Town of Redington Shores 17425 Gulf Blvd. Redington Shores, FL 33708-1299 Seminole: Mr. Allen Godfrey Public Works Director City of Seminole 7464 Ridge Road Seminole, FL 33772-5226 St. Pete Beach: Mr. Bill Miller City of St. Pete Beach 155 Corey Avenue St. Pete Beach, FL 33706-1839 Oldsmar: Mr. Kevin Shropshire City of Oldsmar 351 Lafayette Blvd. Oldsmar, FL 34677-3756 Redinaton Beach: Mr. Mark Davis Public Works Director Town of Redington Beach 105-164th Ave. Redington Beach, FL 33708-1519 Safety Harbor: Ms. Debbie Drees City of Safety Harbor 750 Main Street Safety Harbor, FL 34695 South Pasadena: Mr. Gary Anderson Public Works Director 7047 Sunset Dr. S. South Pasadena, FL 33707-2895 Treasure Island: Mr. James Newton Water Pollution Control Supervisor City of Treasure Island 120 108th Ave. Treasure Island, FL 33706 Tarpon Sprinas: Mr. Mark Schroeder City of Tarpon Springs 323 E. Pine Street Tarpon Springs, FL 34688 SECTION 8. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT is replaced by the following: Any party may terminate this Agreement by notifying all other parties in writing thirty (30) calendar days prior to work commencing at the beginning of the fiscal year. For all parties, fiscal year begins on October 1 s" so termination notices shall be provided no later than September 1 st. The Agreement will stay in effect for all parties remaining. SECTION 10, AGREEMENT TERM is replaced by the following: This Agreement shall take effect as provided in section 13 and shall remain in effect until September 30th, 2010, unless renewed in writing by mutual agreement of all parties hereto for an additional length of time. Page 5 of 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto affixed their hands and seals as the day and year first above written. PINELLAS COUNTY, by and through its County Administrator: By: _ 4z' A - Robert S. L ala County Administrator ?e Oj Witness: GG? APPROVED AS TO FORM: By:f ce of County Attorney 1. KENNETH P- BURKE, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Clerk Ex-Offklo. Board of County Comrnissivnars, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and coned copy of the on Mal as it appears In the official files of the Board of County Corrnnissipners of Pinetias County. Florida. Witness my hand d seal said County FL this day of A.D. 20 KE erk the Circuit Court Fx-Offloo Clerk of the Board of County. Commissioners, Pinellas County. Florida. BY, lie ri Page 6 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA :t--e' K ~ By Ra'nk V. Hibbard Mayor tfJ~B- ~7L William B. Horne II City Manager Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall- i s Assistant City Atto Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM TOWN OF BELLEAIR TOWN OF BELLEAIR Town Mayor By_ Tow eager Attest: Depu Town Clerk Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF BELLEAIR BEACH CITY OF BE City By: u -6, )? l ? e- &&Z40 City snag Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITYITOWN OF Belleair Bluffs City/Town of Belleair Bluffs By: Ci By: City Manager FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM '. '°-•_:.?? CITY OF DUNEDIN 0320 t ?. 0 City of Dunedin By: if . Mayor, Bob Hackwodh r? By: City Man Robert Dispirito \ Attest: V x.51 City Clerk, Jerie Guedalh FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF GULFPORT City of Gulfport By: Michael Yak yor B !/Jx7 Jim O'Reilly, Acting City Manager Z h City C erk Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY/TOWN OF TOWN OF KENNETH CITY City/Town of Kenneth City By: City Mayor By: N/A City Manager Attest: City Cier Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF INDIAN ROCKS BEACH City of Indian Rocks Beach By: R.B. Johnso , Mayor By: Danny E. Taylo , InteriCi manager A st: City Clerk Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY/TOWN OF LARGO City/T of Larg By M yor IC?- By: 7- City Manager oti 'nk``Jp U '4rr r "a' 1905 ct Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000006 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF Madeira Beach By: City of N?bdqira B h ?atricia J/ayor t Sho By; W.D. i i otham, Jr. City er Attest: nise M. Schlegel City Clerk Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM TOWN OF NORTH REDINGTON BEACH Town of No/th Regington Beach By: M. Aft t: Mari mpbe , M , Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Edwin Peck, Town Attorney Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY of OLDSMAR, FLORIDA By: CITY OF OLDSMAR, FLORIDA ,JinyRonecker, City Mayor T. Haddock, City Manager Approved as to form and content by: Awffias Trask, 0 Attorney Attest:..- Lisa A. Lene, City Clerk Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY. (W PI MLAS PARK City of Pinellas Park 4/11 CI y LMavylare-7 William Mischler By: y Manager, Michael B. Gustafson Diane/M. Corna Ap oved as to form and content: City Attorney, James.W. Denhardt Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY/TOWN OF ### REDINGTON BEACH City/Town of ### REDINGTON BEACH By tSy: Attest: (?:"- 4'? - Jerk Janina Patrus, CMC City Manager FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000006 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITYITOWN OF REDINGTON SHORES City/Town of ..Redingt~on Shores B. . '-tity Way-or By: City Manager Attest: ? ?k &' 4r, y Clerk Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF SAFETY HARBOR By: City of Safe-ty-Harbor Andy Ateingold,-M Mayor Matthew SbobrXiN-lAaaAer Attest: Cath Benson, City Clerk Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM City of Seminole By: _ _ Frank admunds, City anager Attes Clerk to Form: Page 7of16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF ST PETE BEACH City of St Pete Beach By: kCity M yor By: -i} City Manager Atte t: en 0 A If /I an ity C erk Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITYRXWWOF ### SOUTH PASADENA City&AM"f ### SOUTH P ARENA By: C City Mayor By: City Manager st: AA? City Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITYITOWN OF ### City/Town of ### By: ti City Mayor, c ( q If a By: j Manager Attest: a ' F ?VAIJJ - City Cler ?? ` Page 7 of 16 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY AND ITS N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FLS000005 CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM CITY/TOWN OF Treasure Island City/Town of Treasure Island By: By: id Silverboard, City Manager Attest: Dawn Foss, City Clerk Approved as to F rm: r Maura Kiefer, ty Attorney Page 7 EXHIBIT A PINELLAS COUNTY AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM IN COMPLIANCE WITH MS4 NPDES PERMIT FLS000005 The Pinellas County Department of Environmental Management (PCDEM) has conducted surface water quality monitoring since 1991. The 1991-2002 monitoring program was designed to collect monthly surface water quality data at a series of fixed stations in County streams, creeks, lakes and marine waters. Beyond fulfilling the monitoring requirements of NPDES permit FLS000005, this monitoring effort provided important water quality data to support Pinellas County watershed planning initiatives, the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan, and the Tampa Bay Estuary Program (TBEP) Comprehensive and Conservation Management Plan (CCMP). I nearly 2002, county staff recognized the need to assess receiving waterbody water quality with a known level of confidence while minimizing sampling bias. In response to the need to improve the monitoring program and growing NPDES and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program requirements, Pinellas County and its co- permittees entered into an Interlocal Agreement to re-design and share the costs of the Ambient Water Quality Monitoring Program. The new program was designed to provide statistically valid and defensible results and to fill gaps in the geographic coverage sampled by the 1991-2002 monitoring program. A. What is the monitoring program intended to accomplish? The revised monitoring program is a three-tiered monitoring approach aimed to: · Assess status and trends in water quality of fresh and marine open waterbodies; · Determine annual and seasonal pollutant loadings delivered from County sub-basins; and · Determine the effectiveness of water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented in the County. The three program components are summarized below. 1. Probabilistic monitorinq desiqn for open waterbodies The first tier of the monitoring program focuses on Pinellas County coastal waters, Lake Seminole, and Lake Tarpon (Figure 1). The monitoring program is a probabilistic design that employs an EMAP-based design element and a stratified random design element. The probabilistic element allows for the calculation of estimates and confidence limits of the total surface area for various water quality conditions within each geographic reporting unit or stratum. The stratified random element allows for the calculation of mean annual estimates of population means and confidence limits. The strengths of this monitoring program are supported by the data analysis and reporting that can be achieved including: . Water quality status and trends calculations; · Identification and prioritization of receiving waters not meeting designated uses; and · Statistical water quality comparisons among geographical reporting units or strata. Page 8 of 16 PINELLAS COUNTY WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM OPEN WATER SEGMENTS N A Pinellas~) ~~I~O~!~TAl MAtlAGEMENI E5 E6 Figure 1. Pinellas County Water Quality Monitoring Program Open Water Segments Page 9 of 16 Fixed site monitorina proaram The second tier of the Pinellas County Ambient Water Quality Monitoring Program includes a series of fixed stream and creek sites located in each basin within the permit coverage area (Figure 2). Sites where water quality samples and flow measurements are taken are located upstream of tidal influences to better characterize stream and creek water quality resulting exclusively from freshwater runoff and to allow for receiving waterbody pollutant loading estimates. Water quality (not flow) is sampled for a few additional sites that are located in marine portions of streams, creeks, or channels. These data are being used to generate baseline countywide loading estimates from a wide variety of basin sizes and land uses as well as to characterize existing in-stream water quality conditions. Flexibility in the year-to-year site selections and sampling frequencies must be allowed to address refinements to sampling objectives and changing federal and state regulatory priorities. In subsequent years it is anticipated that the fixed site monitoring effort will focus on a subset of county basins that comprise a relatively large proportion of the total pollutant loadings generated countywide by stormwater runoff. Sampling focus and intensity may also shift to basins discharging to "Impaired Waters" as identified in the TMDL process. 2. Basin and land use specific Event Mean Concentration (EMC) development and BMP evaluations. In tier three of the monitoring program, Pinellas County is conducting EMC and BMP evaluations at specific sites throughout the County. Monitoring is conducted manually or by using automated sampling systems comprised of refrigerated auto samplers, multi-probe water quality meters, rain gages, and flow sensors. Examples of ongoing evaluations include EMC development in the Cross Bayou watershed and BMP evaluations in the Lake Seminole watershed. Page 10 of 16 PINELLAS COUNTY WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FIXED"LOCATION STREAM SITES 56 I;';. r N A ~ Pinellas ~ ~o~~~~ MAtlAGEJl~ 61 Basins 1 Anclote River 2. K losterm an Bayou 3 Lake Tarpon 4. Brooker Creek 5. 0 Idsm ar 6. South Creek 7. Sutherland Bayou 8. Smith Bayou 9. Cedar Creek 10 CurlewCreek 11. Possum Branch 12. Bishop Creek 13 Mullet Creek 14. Alligator Creek 15 Spring Branch-Stevensons Creek 16. Coastal Zone 4 17. C o.stal Zone 1 18. Steven sons Creek 19. Aliens Creek 20. Coastal Zone 2 21 . Coastal Zone 3 22. Long Branch 23. Roosevelt 24. Cross Bayou 25. Starkey Road 26. Lake Seminole 27. McKay Creek 26. Coastal Zone 5 29. Plnellas Pork Ditch #1 30. Sawgrass Lake 31 . Tinney Creek 32. N.E. SI. Petersburg 33. 70th Ave North Canol 34. 54th Ave East Canol 35. Joes Creek 36. Long Beyou 37. Pasadena Lake 36. SW. SI. Petersburg 39. Bear Creek 40. Book er Creek 41 North Coffee P at Bayou 42. 45th Ave North East C enel 43. Coffee Pot B.you 44. Albert WMted 45. 34th Street 46. C iem Bayou 47. GUlfport 46. F renchm on's Creek 49. Lake Moggorie/Solt Creek 50. Big Bayou 51 Little Bayou Creek 52. P inellas Point 53. St. Joseph Sound 54. C learwoter Harbor North 55. C learwoter H arbor South 56 The Narrows 57. Boce Ciego Boy North 58. Boca Ciega Boy Central 59. Boca Clega Boy South 60. Boca Clego Bay South 61 Tamp. B.y 62. Tampa Bay (RIviere Bey) 63. Old Tam pa Bay Figure 2. Pinellas County Water Quality Monitoring Program Fixed Site Locations. Page 11 of 16 B. When and how is monitoring conducted? 1. Frequencv of monitorinq Monitoring is conducted at four random sites in each open water segment and at all fixed sites approximately every six weeks in the wet season and every seven weeks in the dry season or eight times per year. 2. Tvpe of samplina (water column. bioloqv or sediment) Surface water sampling as specified in DEP-SOP FS 2100 occurs at each site. Sites in the Tampa Bay strata (E1-E7) were only sampled at water depths less than or equal to the 2-meter mean lower low water isobath through 2007. 3. Parameters monitored at each station Please note: the parameters listed below are currently being monitored; however, the list of specific metrics analyzed may vary to some degree year-to-year as funding levels change and specific programs objectives are revised. For all monitorinq sites: PH Water Temperature Specific Conductance/Salinity Dissolved Oxygen Chlorophyll-a, b, c and phaeophytin Ammonia N itrate-N itrite Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Total Nitrogen (TN) Total Phosphorous (TP) Orthophosphate Turbidity Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Color (Lake Seminole, Lake Tarpon, Alligator Lake, and Lake Chautauqua only) For streams, creeks and lakes onlv: Fecal Coliform Enterococci Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD5) Aluminum (Lake Seminole and bypass canal only) For fixed sites onlv: Flow For open water sites onlv: Secchi disk depth Photosythetically Active Radiation (PAR) Transmissivity Page 12 of 16 Water quality parameters were selected to balance County, TBEP, Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), and state goals and objectives for water quality monitoring. For example, Chlorophyll was selected as an indicator of phytoplankton biomass and to assess achievement of segment specific chlorophyll targets set by the TBEP for Tampa Bay. In addition, the state uses a Chlorophyll reference level in their Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) assessment program. TN, TP, and TSS were selected as indicators for water quality in part because TN and TP are used to determine trophic status of lakes and TSS has a direct impact on water clarity. External loadings of these constituents to Tampa Bay are periodically tracked by TBEP as part of the CCMP. Water column light attenuation or water clarity is measured using a Secchi disc, a light meter to determine PAR, and a transmissometer. The amount of surface light reaching the bay bottom is of critical importance and is directly related to the health of seagrasses and other submerged aquatic vegetation. Bacteriological monitoring serves as indicators of pathogens at freshwater sites and for water quality assessments in the TMDL program. The addition of BOD5 is necessary for meeting TMDL requirements. For EMC evaluations: Specific Conductance/Salinity pH Temperature Dissolved Oxygen Total Dissolved Solids Total Suspended Solids Biochemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand Oil & Grease Nitrate + Nitrite (NOX) Ammonia Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Soluble TKN Total Phosphorous Orthophosphate Fecal Coliform Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Zinc Hardness For BMP evaluations: Specific Conductance/Salinity pH Temperature Dissolved Oxygen Total Dissolved Solids Total Suspended Solids NOX Ammonia TKN Total Phosphorous Orthophosphate Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Zinc Fecal coliforms Note: For EMC and BMP evaluations, parameters selected vary according to land use assessed and specific objectives of each BMP evaluation. c. Where are monitoring stations located? Please refer to figures 1 and 2 for open water monitoring segments and fixed sites. As part of the probabilistic design for monitoring water quality in county open water bodies, current funding levels allow for 32 new random sampling locations to be sampled per segment each year. For stream sites, as stated in section A, baseline loading estimates will be calculated to determine Page 13 of 16 which basins contribute the greatest proportion of pollutant loads to county receiving waters. A reduced number of fixed sites may be monitored in subsequent years to focus efforts on basins delivering the greatest loads or on basins discharging to "Impaired" waters. D. Quality Assurance Pinellas County Environmental Management, Water Resources Management section staff conduct all sampling activities in accordance with the applicable FDEP SOPs found in FAC. Chapter 62-160. The FDEP Bureau of Laboratory staff audited the section's performance and the section has met all FDEP requirements for monitoring and reporting. E. Estimates of Pollutant Loadings In year three of the permit, as required in Part V. A., seasonal pollutant loads and EMCs will be calculated for each major drainage basin using a combination of referenced sources and data collected as specified in tier three of the County's monitoring program. F. Reporting Pinellas County Environmental Management plans to report as follows: Annual ReportinQ: . Data summaries including mean, median, minimum, maximum, and standard error values for open water segments and stream sites in narrative, tabular, and graphical formats; . Cumulative Distribution Frequency (CDF) plots relating a quantitative water quality condition or value (e.g., chlorophyll-a :511 ug/I) with a percentage of area within a segment (e.g., 82% of Boca Ciega Bay); . Estimates of the percent of impaired waters within each open water segment; . Comparisons of water quality in eastern segments versus western segments and lake comparisons; and . Creek and stream loading estimates. Everv other year: In addition to above, wet versus dry season comparisons. Everv Five years: In addition to above, spatial and temporal trends are assessed. Page 14 of 16 . " EXHIBIT B MONITORING FEES BREAKDOWN BASED ON ACREAGE Acreage figures provided by Pinel/as Acreaae as % Acreaae County Planning Dept. (February 2008) of February 2008 1 Pinellas County 61413.001 48.79% 2 Town of Belleair 1149.056 0.91% 3 City of Belleair Beach 250.073 0.20% 4 City of Belleair Bluffs 224.419 0.18% 5 City of Clearwater 13926.821 11.06% 6 City of Dunedin 8845.336 7.03% 7 City of Gulfport 1609.563 1.28% 8 City of Indian Rocks Beach 399.832 0.32% 9 Town of Kenneth City 361.08 0.29% 10 City of Largo 9740.162 7.74% 11 City of Madeira Beach 444.683 0.35% 12 Town of North Redington Beach 127.702 0.10% 13 City of Oldsmar 5094.951 4.05% 14 City of Pinellas Park 8737.248 6.94% 15 Town of Redington Beach 155.924 0.12% 16 Town of Redington Shores 158.094 0.13% 17 City of Safety Harbor 2735.375 2.17% 18 City of St. Pete Beach 1088.094 0.86% 19 City of Seminole 2929.731 2.33% 20 City of South Pasadena 569.73 0.45% 21 City of Tarpon Springs 5164.295 4.10% 22 City of Treasure Island 754.817 0.60% TOTALS 125879.99 100.00% Page 15 of 16 ~ I EXHIBIT C DESCRIPTION OF COSTS 1. OPERATING SUPPLIES Operating expenses will include individual items and services exclusively related to the monitoring program. This includes, but is not limited to, sample bottles, sample preservatives, acids for cleaning bottles and glassware, chemical standards and filtration supplies. With each invoice a detailed list of all items purchased for the monitoring program will be provided along with labor and laboratory analysis costs. 2. ANNUAL PRICE INCREASES Based on program costs over previous years, the COUNTY anticipates that annual program cost may increase an average of 5% from year to year due to cost increases in salaries, supply costs, and laboratory charges. In any given year, due to circumstances beyond the COUNTY's control, some cost increases may exceed 5% (e.g. laboratory costs), and thus the overall program cost increase may exceed 5%. The CO-PERMITTEES and COUNTY shall each pay for the total annual cost of the program for each year of this agreement on a pro-rata basis in accordance with those figures set forth in Exhibit B. Page 16 of 16