Emails & Letters in Support/Opposition
/~ 1>6 ~ OJ fill 10 '?/CtuJt Ftl>J-a1l ~-(J.200 d.
I sfand CEstates Civic .Jlssociation
"Promoti1lfJ unity witfiin our community "
~.'...''''.<~.....'
~.'l ~'p<
Mr. Nicholas C. Fritsch, Chairman
Community Development Board
112 S. Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
September 8, 2008
Re: Legg Mason's Application FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
Dear Mr. Fritsch:
The Board of Directors of the Island Estates Civic Association (IECA), along with the
Clearwater Beach Association, supports the Sand Key Civic Association's opposition to the
requested variances to the Community Development Code for the Cabana Club property.
The Community Development Code in section 1-103, General Purposes says is part: "...
to enhance the city and the preservation of neighborhoods; and to enhance the quality of life of all
residents and property owners." As pointed out in the SKCA letter the granting ofthese variances
certainly does not preserve the neighborhood and enhance the quality of life of all residents and
property owners in the vicinity. The requested variances approved by the City Planning Staff
exceed the Code limits even at Flexibility Standard Level Two for the Height and front set-back.
The requested variance for the side variance goes to the very limit of Flexibility Standard Level
Two at Zero feet. The constmction of permanent structures to support cabanas into the Coastal
Constmction Zone violates the concept of even having a Coastal Construction Zone established by
the City to protect the beach area. The granting of the requested variances will not preserve the
neighborhood or enhance the quality of life for all residents and property owners (the current
resident's and property owners).
The Community Development Code describes three sets of development standards for
Zoning Areas. The first is Minimum Standard Development, Level One. The second is Flexible
Standard Development, Level One. The Third is Flexible Standard Development Level Two.
Each of the Flexible Standards reduces at least some of the requirements from the preceding
standard. Our citizens understand and accept the requirements under the Minimum Standard
Development as no one wants to limit reasonable development or improvement of existing
structures. However, most do not understand that there are the other two development standards
which can significantly increase the footprint of a proposed development, and which the City
grants with such frequency that developers have no reason not to ask for the maximum and
beyond. There are criteria listed in the Code that are expected to be met before a Flexibility
Standard is approved. For Overnight Accommodations it appears at least three of the criteria for
the granting of Flexible Standards are violated. One is: "the use of the parcel proposed for
development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street." The only access to this
parcel is from Gulf Boulevard. A second criteria: "the increased height will not reduce the vertical
component of the view from any adjacent residential property." The higher the building the more
ORIGiNAl
RECEIVED
H'''' Q
~..'.'. .
, ,,'~'
140 IsfantfWay, #239, Cf.earwater, PL 33767
www.iecivicassociation.com
=~:? i) 9 2DC2
PI 111\11\111\'''' ........ __ __. 0_
Isfana P.states Civic fl-ssociation
"Promoting unity witfiin our community ,.
1W4
it restricts the view from the adjacent residential property. The third criteria: "the reduction in side
and rear setbacks does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles."
Zero side set-back limits the space for an emergency vehicle to proceed.
Why is the Island Estates Civic Association concerned about variances on Sand Key? It is
because the routine approval of requests for the maximum flexibility standard appears to be the
norm by the City and there no longer appears to be any reason for the other standards. The
Association and residents must be constantly on the lookout for variances that adversely affect the
neighborhood and bring them to the City's attention. For example, we have the same problem
with height variances as proposed in this case. In the IECA Neighborhood Conservation Overlay
District Code for single family houses the height limit is 30 feet. Then the City applies the flood
level which makes the height no more than 42/43 feet. However, based on traditional practice
according to the Chief of the Planning Department, the maximum height is at the mid-pointof the
roof. Therefore many of our newer structures exceed the height limits the citizens approved or are
in the Community DevelopmentCode. We see no flexibility in the height limit in either the
Community Development Code or the IENCOD for the top of the roof to exceed the height limit
in any situation where the Code is clear. On Island Estates we now have single story houses that
are overshadowed by a house wall over 42 feet high that is closer to the property line than the
minimum standard allows. On a lot such as mine, enforcing the minimum standard would allow a
new house to exceed 7,800 sq feet, but under the current enforcement of the Code the City would
allow the footprint to be expanded for a bigger house. The City Staff recommendation for this
case allows for the height to exceed the maximum of 50 feet, in Flexible Standard Level Two, plus
the flood level. v\'hy is that the case? We also experience l1~e granting of permits that violate the
CDC in other areas and have a case which has been ongoing for over 18 months, where the city
granted variances to the site visibility triangle, by declaring that plants are structures. The City is
in the process of asking the owner if he will remove the plants. Do we have enforceable standards
or not?
We ask that the Community Development Board stop the current practice of encouraging
developers to propose the maximum flexibility to the Community Development Code. We ask
that you set the expected standard at the Minimum Development Standard, Level One. Any
request for variance from that standard would require that the neighborhood be notified and
approve exceeding the minimum standard. This will change the current practice where there are
no building standards the current residents can be confident that the Community Development
Board will enforce. With the change we request, the current residents would be in control of
changes to the character of their neighborhood.
Sincerely,
. [) JiT fJ~-=
~ 0
. on':''::::::.=.:-
'''0
=~'~ 140 IsfantfWay, #239, Cfearwater, PL 33767
www.iecivicassociation.com
.;:-;:p (, '~:1
.J_" ;) c.
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:04 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Legg Mason
-----Original Message-----
From: Nan & Dick Ruben (mailto:dnruben@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:48 AM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Frank Vandyke; Hibbard, Frank; joellen farnham; george cretekos
Subject: Legg Mason
I was very disturbed by the recent approval by Wayne Wells for all the deviations in the proposed hotel that Legg
Mason is planning at the Cabana Club site. The city makes rules and then at the first opportunity "multiple
deviations" come in to play when it suits them and goes against the people of the community. Where is the
protection to the local property owner? Is our investment, our homes, and our neighbor for sale at the whim of the
promise of dollars for the city? We residents of Clearwater pay the salaries of people like Wayne Wells....so why
aren't they working to support us instead of Legg Mason?
Nancy J. Ruben
1430 Gulf Blvd.
#501
Clearwater, FL 33767
727 -595-2736
dnruben@verizon.net
9/912008
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Monday, September 08, 2008 2:06 PM
Wells, Wayne
FW: Legg Mason/Cabana Club
-----Original Message-----
From: Shonnie & Bill Kiser [mailto:SBKiser@webtv.net]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:49 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Legg Mason/Cabana Club
Dear Ms. Watkins; This is to let you know that my wife and I are in
favor of Legg Mason's plans to redevelop the Cabana Club Property. We
are long time residents of Sand Key (our condominium is next to the
Cabana Club condos)and feel that the plans we've seen will enhance the
values and lifestyle of our community. I request that you deliver this
E-mail to the appropriate members of the Community Development Board,
the City Manager and other officials who will act on this matter. Thank
You, William Kiser, 1520 Glf Blvd.
1
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 7:59 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Opposition to Cabana club/Legg Mason
-----Original Message-----
From: Om1480@aol.com [mailto:Om1480@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 12:28 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Re: Opposition to Cabana c1ubjLegg Mason
I am strongly opposed to the redevelopment of the Cabana property.
olga milne 1480 gulf blvd. clearwater 33767
Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog. plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at
StyleList.com.
9/R/?OOR
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Friday, September 05, 2008 7:45 AM
Wells, Wayne
FW: Cabana Club/Legg Mason Proposal
Importance:
High
-----Original Message-----
From: leelin [mailto:leelin@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:09 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry; Hibbard, Frank; Doran, John; Petersen, Carlen;
Cretekos, George; Gibson, Paul
Subject: Cabana Club/Legg.Mason Proposal
Importance: High
Dear Ms Watkins,
We are writing to encourage you to deny Legg Mason's several requests for
variances in order to build their hotel and restaurant. How will our
community provide fire and police protection with this increase in density
and pedestrian traffic? Who will pay for it? The zoning restrictions
currently in place provide safeguards for all of us. And, once Legg Mason's
variances are approved, a precedent will be in place for all the other big
businesses that would like to exploit a piece of our beautiful key. The
variances requested are unbelievable. How would Wayne Wells react if a mere
taxpayer requested such variances? Please respect the key, its residents and
zoning ordinances that were thoughtfully put in place by our community
forefathers.
Please don't be influenced by Legg Mason's big bucks and promises of
increased tax revenues.
Respectfully,
Linda and Leland Walter
1480 Gulf.Blvd #204
Clearwater, FL 33767
1
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 20082:09 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: leggs mason
Importance: High
-----Original Message-----
From: JBIRD400@aol.com [mailto:JBIRD400@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03,20081:28 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: leggs mason
Dear Sherry Watkins,
We are FOR the Leggs Mason proposal for a hotel (Cabana Club) on Sand
Key. Please ensure that this is distributed to CDB, the Mayor & Council
memebers.
thank you.
Jay & Gail Jorgensen
190 Sand Key Estates Drive
"'---w-~e- rrl "':l"'7'~"'7'
\"t:dl dl. I, Jv/fJl
jay jorgensen
190 sand key estates drive
clearwater, f/orida 33767
cell 727-460-5003
residence 727-593-1672
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
OI'l/,)f\f\Q
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 3:29 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Please distribute to COB
-----Original Message----
From: PhyllisZeno@aol.com [mailto:PhyllisZeno@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02,200811:19 AM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Please distribute to COB
To the CDB
After putting five children through college (three of mine, two of his) my huband and I decided we
needed to take life a little easier and we moved to Tampa in 1974. Sad to say, my husband died shortly
after, and I returned to work again and became Creative Director for AAA Auto Club South. As
founding editor of AAA Gong Places, I was happily employed for 29 years, but four years ago at the
age of 78, I was ready to retire and take life a little easier.
I bought a condo at the Cabana Club and thought I would spend the rest of my years in quiet and
serene surroundings. Little did I know what was about to befall me.
Legg Mason announced that they would refurbish the Belleview Biltmore in Belleair and at the same
time, build a new 38-room hotel on Sand Key in the parking lot outside my bedroom windows. At
same time, the Cabaila Club announced that all of our balconies were going to have to be replaced to
the tune of $750,000, and we would be assessed triple our maintenance fee for over a year.
When a few us timid souls suggested that we were ready to join other neighboring condos to seek
protection from this intrusion on our quiet neighborhood, our board president sent a survey to our 85
condo owners, reminding them of our upcoming balcony assessments and pointing out that to seek
legal assistance would cost us upwards of$125,000. If they chose to fight the adjoining hotel, our
president would be forced to resign, he said, because our building improvements would require all his
time, and he was a Canadian~ citizen. Our residents wee terrified at the looming expenses, and many of
them voted in favor of the hotel.
Armed with this ammunition, Legg Mason revised their initial humble plan for a small, boutique hotel
and began seeking additional variances that would allow them to build higher and Wider, encroaching
on our privacy, yet reducing the number of parking places that accommodated the existing restaurant,
guaranteeing that our driveway would be flooded with cars, noise and inconvenience. At the same
time, LM submitted a proposal stating that Cabana Club residents had responded favorably to a survey
and were eagerly awaiting this edifice that would increase our condo value and lower our taxes.
With their new proposal, condo owners suddenly realized the horror that was about to befall them, but
it was too late. Or is it?
On Tuesday, September 16, it will all be in the hands of the City Planning Board. They, and they
Q/?/?()()R
Page 2 of2
alone, can grant the demands of these greedy developers and leave an 82-year-old widow like myself
helpless to defend her right to spend her declining years in peace and quiet.
Won't you please defend our right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness when many of us have
worked a lifetime to achieve this goal?
Wistfully,
Phyllis W. Zeno
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
Q/? /?OOR
To the CDB
After putting five children through college (three of mine, two of his) my hub and and I
decided we needed to take life a little easier and we moved to Tampa in 1974. Sad to say,
my husband died shortly after, and I returned to work again and became Creative
Director for AAA Auto Club South. As founding editor of AAA Gong Places, I was
happily employed for 29 years, but four years ago at the age of78, I was ready to retire
and take life a little easier.
I bought a condo at the Cabana Club and thought I would spend the rest of my years in
quiet and serene surroundings. Little did I know what was about to befall me.
Legg Mason announced that they would refurbish the Belleview Biltmore in Belleair and
at the same time, build a new 38-room hotel on Sand Key in the parking lot outside my
bedroom windows. At same time, the Cabana Club announced that all of our balconies
were going to have to be replaced to the tune of $750,000, and we would be assessed
triple our maintenance fee for over a year.
When a few us timid souls suggested that we were ready to join other neighboring condos
to seek protection from this intrusion on our quiet neighborhood, our board president
sent a survey to our 85 condo owners, reminding them of our upcoming balcony
assessments and pointing out that to seek legal assistance would cost us upwards of
$125,000. If they chose to fight the adjoining hotel, our president would be forced to
resign, he said, because our building improvements would require all his time, and he
was a Canadian citizen. Our residents wee terrified at the looming expenses, and many of
them voted in favor of the hotel.
Armed with this ammunition, Legg Mason revised their initial humble plan for a small,
boutique hotel and began seeking additional varia..'1ces that \vould allow them to build
higher and wider, encroaching on our privacy, yet reducing the number of parking places
that accommodated the existing restaurant, guaranteeing that our driveway would be
flooded with cars, noise and inconvenience. At the same time, LM submitted a proposal
stating that Cabana Club residents had responded favorably to a survey and were eagerly
awaiting this edifice that would increase our condo value and lower our taxes.
With their new proposal, condo owners suddenly realized the horror that was about to
befall them, but it was too late. Or is it?
On Tuesday, September 16, it will all be in the hands of the City Planning Board. They,
and they alone, can grant the demands of these greedy developers and leave an 82-year-
old widow like myself helpless to defend her right to spend her declining years in peace
and quiet.
Won't you please defend our right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness when many
of us have worked a lifetime to achieve this goal?
Wistfully,
Phyllis W. Zeno
Wells, Wayne
Page 1 of 1
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 1 :28 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Opposition to the Legg Mason's application
-----Original Message-----
From: Boshart, Jon [mailto:JBOSHART@spc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02,200812:38 PM
To: Hibbard, Frank; Doran, John; Petersen, Carlen; Cretekos, George; Gibson, Paul; Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Opposition to the Legg Mason's application
Dear Sirs,
As a resident of The Grande on Sand Key (1170 Gulf Blvd, #206) I and my family are very opposed to the Legg
Mason's application.
Please do not allow this to happen to Sand Key.
Thank you,
Jon Boshart
Prof. Jon D. Boshart, Ph.D.
Chair, Department of Fine Arts
Saint Peter's College
2641 Kennedy Blvd.
Jersey City, NJ 07306
qnnOOR
Page 1 of1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11 :46 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Legg Mason/Cabana Club Redevelopment
-----Original Message-----
From: Norm Englert [mailto:nenglert@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02,200811:36 AM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Legg Mason/Cabana Club Redevelopment
Not all Sand Key residents are opposed to a new 38 room boutique hotel and upscale restaurant on the Cabana
Club property. If done within reasonable bounds, this fulltime 23-year Sand Key resident is in favor of the
change and improvement. .
I believe it is a very vocal minority in opposition, lead by a few who have personal issues, such as loss of view.
Please make the decision knowing not all of the immediate area residents are opposed. And at least this one is
fully in support.
Thank you,
Norm Englert
140 Marina del Rey
Clearwater, FL 33767
727.510.7951
Qnn()()~
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Larry Edger [Iarry@dogtech.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 31,20088:59 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club Hotel
Wayne;
Just a note to say many of us support the plans for the proposed hotel on Sand Key. The only exception is the
limited parking. They cannot build a hotel and a 165 seat restaurant with only 50 parking spots. Employees alone
will need most of those.
They must cut back somewhere.
Larry Edger
Backwaters on Sand Kev
Maggie Mae's
Q I'll I') ()() Q
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Jimmy Uimmy@cscproperties.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26,200812:52 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: ~abana Club, Sand Key
-----Original Message-----
From: Jimmy [mailto:jimmy@cscproperties.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26,200812:46 PM
To: Wayne.Wells@myclerwater.com
Cc: msmith@belleviewbiltmore.com
Subject: Cabana Club, Sand Key
Wayne, it appears that this project is meeting all requirements, and that the opposition is
sort of "stretching things" to prevent it. As a citizen of Clearwater, and a patron of the
Cabana Club, I would like to register my support for this project.
Thanks -
Jimmy Walker
311 Druid Road West, Clearwater, FL 33756
(727) 446-3444 0
(727) 446-5014 f
(727) 709-4700 c
~/?()/?OOR
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, August 26,20082:16 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Support for the Cabana Club redevelopment
-----Origina\ Message-----
From: BIKERSCAFE@aol.com [mailto:BIKERSCAFE@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26,2008 12:13 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Support for the Cabana Club redevelopment
As an English Lady who winters close to Sand Key, am I missing something here? I think the protesters of the
SON group appear to be a sad bunch of NIMBYs (No In My Back Yard) who seem to have conveniently
fogotten the history of sandkey. The Biltmore were ferrying guest over to a cabana on a deserted sand
key nearly a century ago. It is they (SON) and others who have been part of the sand key development and that
includes those who bought a property or business there, who have built the urban jungle up around a nice small
little cabana club and turned a deserted beach into the urban environment it is today. Now the Cabana club
want to develop, it seems that what was sauce for the goose cannot be sauce for the gander. I am personally
sad that the cabana is not continuing as it is but I accept their right/need to develop as a business. It is one of
the last few remaining old world charms of the Pinellas coast, where you can have a drink and light meal
watching the sun go down with courteous staff who do not hassle you to finish up so they can get there next lot
of tipper onto your table. You get a real feeling of causal laid back tropical charm and it will be sorely missed.
Barbara
R/?fll?OOR
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Monday, August 25, 2008 8:29 AM
Wells, Wayne
FW:
-----Original Message-----
From: Cheryl Hopler [mailto:chopler@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:41 PM
To: Cretekos, George
Cc: Manni, Diane; Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Re:
George,
Thanks for the informative letter. Who would need to give them permission to
build on 25 feet of the beach?
Hopefully, Environmentalists and the State, as I am quite sure that would
take years and they would not let it
happen. This is my biggest objection as I feel it is ALL of our
responsibilities to protect our precious environment
especially our limited Coastline and Beach. Maybe I should alert them to
this proposed project. I think I will.
Cheryl Hopler
----- Original Message -----
From: <george.cretekos@myclearwater.com>
To: <chopler@tampabay.rr.com>
Cc: <Diane.Manni@myClearwater.com>; <Sherry.Watkins@myClearwater.com>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:19 PM
Ms. Cheryl Hopler
1340 Gulf Boulevard, #15C
Clearwater,. FL 33767
Dear Cheryl:
Thank you for advising me of your concerns over the proposed redevelopment
of the "Cabana Club" property on Sand Key.
As you know, a completed application for a change in the development plan,
as presented by the Legg-Mason developers, will be considered by the City of
Clearwater's Community Development Board. For now, there is no zoning
application pending since the property is currently zoned "C" (commercial),
which allows for hotel development. Because of the type of modification
being requested, I am told that the City Council will review the application
only if the developer requests an increase in density units per acre. In
the meantime, I have expressed your concerns directly to the Community
Development Board and its staff representative, and you may also wish to
attend one of CDB meetings which are held on the third Tuesday of each
month. It is this board that has the authority to approve the site plans,
and its consideration of the Legg Mason proposal is being postponed until
September 16, 2008, at 1:00pm.
Again, thank you for taking time to advise me of your views, and with
warmest, personal regards, I am
Sincerely,
1
--george
george n. cretekos
member, clearwater city council
727-562-4050
george.cretekos@myclearwater.com <mailto:george.cretekos@myclearwater.com>
(please note that under florida's public record laws, written
communications, including e-mails, to and from members of city council
regarding official business are public record and will be made available to
all members of the clearwater ~ity council and the press)
2
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Monday, August 25,20088:29 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Legg Mason trying to build a hotel on Sand Key (File #FLD2008-02002)
-----Original Message-----
From: BARBGOLF@aol.com [mailto:BARBGOLF@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:37 AM
To: Watkins, Sherry; Hibbard, Frank; Doran, John; Petersen, Carlen; Cretekos, George; Gibson, Paul
Subject: Legg Mason trying to build a hotel on Sand Key (File #FLD2008-02002)
Please give my message to COB members.
What on earth is the matter with Wayne Wells? Why would he approve an application from a company that is
trying to circumvent every rule and code in the book?
This company wants to take public beach, supported by public funds, for its own private use.
They want to build a huge building on a lot that's less than half the required size.
They even want to build it higher than code.
They are trying to get away with less parking than required by not mentioning the restaurant will be larger than a
normal hotel restaurant. Where will all the employees park-they're not all going to ride a trolley!
Running a ferry up and down the canal is a terrible idea. We won't have any plant or sea animal life there any
more.
If people on Sand Key wanted to live in an area like Miami Beach, they would have moved there!
Barbara Ferree, owner of two condos at 1591 Gulf Blvd.
**************
I+'e- "nh, ,., deal if I'+'S uvh""e """ '""n+ +,..,..,.. Cin~ "0' ,.. +r....",..r ~,......I h,....,..
IL <> VIIIY Q 'L V Ivl YVU VVOIIL LV ~V, I IIIU Y UJ L QVv' UvQ' IIv'v.
(http://information . travel,aol. com/deals?ncid=aoltrv0005000000004 7)
Q 1'1 t;. 1'1 AA Q
August 14, 2008
i) ,,'~ ,........". ,"
'i'~ 'q J,"" ".
~, .~.. . ~,,,"'i ~~ ~ \8: :t; 'f
TO: City of Clearwater
A TIN: Michael Delk and Cynthia E. Goudeau
,\/1;"' 1 <')
,.,~.J 10 2008
OFJ:u , .' /
If' : ,"'~ ~~CORDS t\Nf)
" GlSLill~E SRVCS DEPi
FROM: Patricia A. Hayes
SUBJECT: City Public Hearing Notice dated August 19,2008
In reference to your notice, no date, pertaining to Belleview Biltmore Owner, LLC.
Consideration for saving the tax payer and the City of Clearwater funds City
Government should take proposed bids by other than one city planner, i.e., Wayne Wells
and proposal of a three limitation for city planners to allow and provide considerable
planning and development. The proposal being made should be billed to the individual
or company making the proposal and not to the taX payer or the City of Clearwater.
Authorization should then go through channels and not just a city council meeting. The
proposal should also be addressed to local and permanent residents of the community
being affected by such action.
Home owners under this particular proposal are very concerned citizens whom most do
not know or are unaware of what the Florida Statute 286.0105 entails and what the
repercussions might be or the technicalities of the Statute and the proposal at hand.
Consideration of the above and amendments to the proposal should there be a delay
should be'addressed. This Community Development which it is not is a mis-
representation of what a democracy stands for and has gone so far as making it as a
proposal should have been stopped some time ago.
I hope that City Government and the concerned citizens of this community are heard and
listened to for what they have to say as that is more important than an Assigned Planner
and the person or business that he/she represents.
Sincerely,
--- - ..,...,
-'- (C ~ r;;\ n r;:::JI' ,-- -'" '
,. . r \' "',if,' \ ~--"" .
;l--, \.-- .\,;. ,;:=:J . \,
,: lS G ~U \!j i~; \, J' ,I'i
, - - ,--- --, 1 I
: r-- ,- i
-\l\, ' d 2 I" '/ ~
\ ' -'
r;2J ...~~
v~~ ,.
Patricia A.- aye,
1621 Gulf Boulevard, # l 004
Clearwater, FL 33767
" :.-"~LOP~,1c~,-
... c' '1
----->'
August 11, 2008
Page 1 of3
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:23 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: SON Response to SK Residents FINAL (08 11 08)
-----Original Message----
From: Jim Strenski (mailto:strenski@jjconsulting.org]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 20083:24 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne
Cc: Hibbard, Frank; Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Petersen, Carlen
Subject: SON Response to SK Residents FINAL (08 11 08) .
Re: Cabana Club Hotel Plans--- Please carefully consider the attached response to the 8/6 Martin Smith
letter re: Legg Mason's hotel plans. This SON response addresses a variety of important points that
deserve the attention of all CDB members, points not addressed by Legg Mason. May I also respectfully
question Legg Mason's last minute postponment of the 8/19 CDB hearing to 9/16/08? It wasn't for lack
of a quorum... A nu mber of concerned citizens built their week around the August date. What's to
prevent Legg Mason from asking for additional postponments to suit their needs? Don't citizen's needs
dererve respect? Thanks for your time. James B. Strenski, #1205, 1200 Gulf Blvd.
August 11, 2008
Dear Concerned Neighbors of Sand Key:
Weare writing to you in response to a letter you may have received from Martin Smith, Managing
Director of the Belleview Biltmore Resort. Legg Mason owns the Cabana Club Restaurant property and the
Belleview Biltmore Resort. Save Our Neighborhood (SON) is assuming Mr. Smith is speaking on behalf of
the owner and his employer, Legg Mason. Mr. Smith's letter is very disconcerting and We will do our best to
address each issue that is raised and bring to light issues that are not addressed.
Use of the Beach: Legg Mason intends to place canvas cabanas, plant grass and install pavers on 25' of
beach property west of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). The purpose of the CCCL is to
protect the beach and property and that is why it is regulated by the state. The cabanas would not be
removed at night and only in case of storms. This part of the beach is habitat for sea turtle nests and sea
oats. Relying on the legalese argument, Legg Mason is technically correct that this is not a "taking", but a
"use" of the beach because it falls within Legg Mason's property lines. However, we fail to see the practical
difference in terms of the effect on the beach. Historically, this is the narrowest part of the beach on the
island. Presently, it measures 110' in comparison to the 900' width at the north end of the island.
Parking: Legg Mason says that 56 parking spaces on the property exceed the City's code requirement of 38
spaces and the actual parking demand for a hotel of this size. . They are correct that the Code requires one
parking space per hotel room. What Legg Mason doesn't tell you is that its proposed restaurant is much
larger than necessary to serve its hotel patrons. It is defining the restaurant as an "accessory" use and linking
it to the Belleview Biltmore Hotel in Belleair to avoid providing parking for restaurant guests. An example
of an accessory use restaurant would be "Rusty's" at the Sheraton on Sand Key where the number of hotel
rooms exceeds the number of restaurant seats. Legg Mason's July 14th plans show restaurants with 165
seats, which is far more seats than necessary for a 38 room hotel. The restaurant will be open to guests from
Q /')" /') ()() Q
August 11, 2008
Page 2 of3
the 425 room Belleview Biltmore and the public. Applying the common sense test - where do 20-25
employees, the Cabana Club Hotel guests, the Belleview Biltmore Hotel guests, and the public who frequent
the restaurant, park their vehicles? Legg Mason's answer is that it will shuttle its employees and the
Belleview Biltmore guests, however, it is disingenuous to claim all employees, managers and hotel guests
with vehicles, will use the shuttle. And where will the shuttle buses park? This is another example of Legg
Mason's failure to act as a good neighbor. Our community will suffer the results of insufficient parking.
Height: According to Legg Mason, the proposed hotel is NOT "100 feet tall" or a "lO-story high
restaurant/hotel complex." Legg Mason says it is a "boutique" hotel that is only 67 feet high, or 6 stories
over one story of parking). Again, Legg Mason is using the Code language to circumvent the answer to the
question that the neighbors have been asking for months - How high will the building be? Practical people
think of building height from the ground to the top of the roof. Simple math says 14 feet (parking) + 67 feet
(building) + 10 feet (to top of roofline) = 91 feet give or take. Using Dan's Island on the south side of the
property as a bench mark, the roofline falls somewhere between the ninth and tenth floor of that neighboring
condominium building (90'-100').
Setbacks and Location of Building: It is impossible to build Legg Mason's proposed hotel/restaurant on
this small site without numerous deviations from the City's Code. What is not mentioned in their letter is that
the City's Code requires them to have a lot 200 feet wide in order to build a structure of the size proposed. In
order to squeeze this oversized building onto this small site, Legg Mason is asking for a reduction of the lot
width requirement to 88 feet. As a result they also have to ask for more deviations to the code in the form of
"setbacks" for three out of four of the property lines:
a. The Code requires that the parking lot pavement be setback 25 feet from Gulf Boulevard. They
want that requirement reduced to 5 feet. .
b. On the north s~de of the building the Code requires them to be set back from their property line,
zero to ten feet. They want that requirement reduced to Zero.
c. On the west/Gulf side, they want to build the hotel building right up to the Coastal Construction
Control Line. The Code requires them to build it back 20 feet.
The bottom line is that there is nothing "boutique" or "modest" about this proposed hotel on this site.
Dock: Legg Mason says it has deleted all references to Lhe use of the dock on Gulf Boulevard from its
pending application "due to the community input and concerns" and after evaluating its options will, once,
again address this issue. What Legg Mason does not tell you is: 1) they made an offer to purchase an
alternative piece of property on the same canal that has not been withdrawn; and 2) that eleven days after
making this statement in their July resubmission of their application to the City, their attorney sent a letter to
the Condominium property to which the dock at issue abuts threatening to move forward with an application
for the permits and to begin using the dock. Thus, their public statements that they are not pursuing use of
the dock at this time is disingenuous. There appears to be no reason to believe that Legg Mason has
abandoned an earlier stated intention of ferrying its guests from its 425 hotel rooms at the Belleview
Biltmore Resort down a canal that is exclusively residential with private marinas and manatees enjoying a
habitat that sustains them.
Adverse Financial Impact on Neighborhood: What we fail to see in Legg Mason's letter is any reference
to the significant financial harm that will be caused to the home value of over 100 families who live in the
residential properties that surround this less than one acre piece of commercial property should this
hotel/restaurant be constructed as planned.
Concerns of the Community: In addition to the contrary positions Legg Mason has taken publicly and
privately regarding its consideration of the "community concerns" on the dock issue, Legg Mason denied a
request by SON for a public meeting in July on Sand Key, or even in Clearwater, to allow Legg Mason's
final building plans to be presented and reviewed with Sand Key residents. Instead, Legg Mason held the
meeting at the Belleview Biltmore Resort where the majority of attendees were not Sand Key residents, and
attendance was small.
Take It Or Leave It: Legg Mason conducted two public presentations on Sand Key in February and March
before the plans were final in July. At both meetings, residents asked if Legg Mason would consider another
redevelopment plan, but that was summarily dismissed with the attitude of "take it or leave it." If Legg
Q f') " I') ()() Q
August 11, 2008
Page 3 of3
Mason had been a good neighbor and engaged the community in a true dialogue, they would have learned
that the community welcomes redevelopment of this site within the City's Code and without deviations.
Ideas such as a 4- 5 star restaurant, private beach club, smaller hotel, spa, or, beach villas have been made.
Legg Mason's letter implies that if you do not accept their proposed hotel, your only option is a gas station,
liquor store, nightclub or a used car lot. Again, this is another disingenuous response as such uses would be
economically unrealistic considering the site is valuable beach front property.
SON supports the redevelopment of this site within the parameters of the City's Code, but, without the need
for deviations and for our community to be engaged in an open and honest dialogue that does not hide the
real intentions of the developer. We hope this response has been informative and helpful.
Sincerely,
Cynthia L. Remley on behalf of SA VB OUR NEIGHBORHOOD
Q /'"), /,")()()Q
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Monday, August 25,20088:22 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Planning Commission approval of Legg Mason application - this is so wrong!
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Artz [mailto:artzs@msn.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 10:26 PM
To: Harry Artz; Hibbard, Frank; Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Watkins, Sherry; Petersen, Carlen
Cc: jofarnham@yahoo.com; RTARSIN@aol.com
Subject: Planning Commission approval of Legg Mason application - this is so wrong!
Mr. Hibbard -
We have just learned that the City's Planning Department has issued
its final report "recommending" approval of Legg Mason's application
for deviations from the code in order to build a 38 room hotel, 165 seat
restaurant and place cabanas, grass and pavers on 25 feet' of the beach
west of the Coastal Construction Control Line at the Cabana Club
restaurant site.
Why would the planning commission do this. It seems that they have
ignored the current code and the community.
We know that the CDB is NOT required to follow the Planning
Department's recommendation to grant the deviations for the Cabana
Club redevelopment. It is to consider and listen to the concerns of the
neighborhood, as well. The CDB did just that when it did NOT follow
the City Planning Department's recommendation to zone the Shoppes
on Sand Key to tourist and, instead, voted to zone them commercial.
It does appear that the Planning Department is not in step with our
desires and w~ hope that each of you help us to work through this.
We really hope that the Community Development Board overrules this
misguided recommendation and sends both the planning commission
and Legg Mason back to the drawing board with a clear message that
this is not what the community wants, nor is this in keeping with the
codes established for the community.
It makes no sense for the planning commission and CDB, the
Q /') <;. /') (1(1 Q
Page 2 of2
community, and each of you to not be able to work to a reasonable
compromise. The variations requested are outrageous and extreme,
and not at all variences within reason.
This is so dissappointing and we do hope that you all share your
outrage and displeasure with the planning commission.
Rarely have we felt so strongly as we have with both the shoppes
at Sank Key and the Cababan club issues.
This is so wrong.
Harry and Debby Artz
Talk to your Yahoo! Friends via Windows Live Messenger. Find Out How
SV?"I?OO~
Page 1 0[2
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:22 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Please Say No To Legg Mason Expansion on Sand Key
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel [mailto:dzmoore@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 5:53 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Please Say No To Legg Mason Expansion on Sand Key
August 15, 2008
Re: Please Say No to the Legg Mason Request for New Hotel on Sand Key
TO: Community Development Board Members
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Director of Planning
My wife and I have been living full time on Sand Key for almost 25 years. The reason we decided on Sand
Key was the simple fact it was a private residential beachfront community. When we moved here we
expected additional residential condominiums to be built in the future. And as you know, the residential
developers eventually completed the total development of Sand Key. Residential yes, commercial no
way.
But now, Sand Key Residents are being hammered and hammered and hammered by a commercial
developer being financed by the huge investment bank Legg Mason. It appears, as the new owner's of
the Belleview Biltmore Hotel located in Belleair, Legg Mason cannot possibly succeed with their Belleair
investment unless they convince the City of Clearwater to provide special considerations for a major
expansion of their existing restaurant property currently attached to the Cabana Club Condominium, a
residential building.
It doesn't surprise me to see an investment banker throw its weight around trying to permanently change
Sand Key's residential nature with a hotel development project. They don't give a darn about their
neighbors; they want to make money for their investors, period.
However, Sand Key Clearwater residents are fortunate to have the City of Clearwater standing in its path.
A true David versus Goliath showdown of the visions for Sand Key. As you already know, Sand Key
Clearwater residents oppose the construction of a new hotel property on the south side of Sand Key.
Please say no to their requests for the following reasons:
The current location is and has always been a small unobtrusive restaurant; it was originally and
purposely built this way because it was located in a residential neighborhood.
Legg Mason's plans are way too big and require the use of Public Property for their expansion. Including
our fragile renourished beachfront.
The blocked vista views will dramatically and adversely affect the value of already de-valued residential
properties.
The minimal potential for increased revenue to the City of Clearwater can't possibly justify the permanent
Q /')" /')()()Q
Page 2 of2
disruption to our residential community. The decreasing values of the residential condominiums around
this new hotel structure must be considered as an eventual loss of tax revenue.
And finally, where does Legg Mason's request end? They want Public Property, they don't really care
about their neighbor's objections and they have plans to further disrupt our privacy by operating a ferry
service from the Belleview Biltmore to their new Sand Key hotel. Imagine how terrible it will be for all the
residents having a new ferry service weaving through the narrow canals of Sand Key.
Obviously, Legg Mason has no concept of the difference between the residential area of Sand Key
Clearwater and the tourist area of Clearwater Beach. And if they do know the difference, they just don't
carel We sure hope all of you care. Please stand up to these developers and just say no to Legg Mason's
hotel project. The City of Clearwater can't be this desperate for revenue. Thank you for your vote in
stopping their request.
Respectfully,
Daniel & Zena Moore
Lighthouse Towers Condominium
1290-305 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater, FL 33767
727 -595-1251
~/?,,/?()()~
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Monday, August 25,20088:21 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Cabana Club Sand Key
-----Original Message-----
From: D&D Hopkins [mailto:dhop166@msn.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 5:29 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Cabana Club Sand Key
For the Community Development Bd Aug 19 meet.
Re: Cabana Club Sand Key Remodel
I have reviewed the proposed redevelopment of the Cabana club. I am not opposed to the
redevelopment of the property by legg Mason, however it must be done within existing
codes and standards.
I am opposed to the granting of any variances from City or State, building or zoning
codes for the redevelopment.
I live across Gulf Blvd in the Marina del Rey townhouses, thus I will be impacted by any
redevelopment.
The City and state codes have been established after due consideration by elected
authorities and should be followed.
In particular I am opposed to the variance of any development seaward of the CCL. This is
a line that is established to reduce impacts on coastal erosion. The Cabana Club location is
at a more vulnerable area were coastal erosion has occurred in the past. When the shore
was nourished a few years ago, the shore line had eroded up to the seawall at the adjacent
Dans Island condo. The erosion was continuing toward the Cabana Club property. Due to
the public monies spent to nourish the beach, the private seawalls were saved.
Construction beyond the CCl increases the risk of shore erosion.
I am also opposed to the encroachment of a tall building onto the right-of-way for the Public
beach access between the CC and Dans Island condo. The code setback must be
maintained on the south side of the property.
I am also opposed to any encroachment into the setback from Gulf Blvd. Any thing closer
than the code allows now would be out of character with the existing neighbors.
Thank you for your interest in serving the City.
David Hopkins
~/?"/?()m~
Page 2 of2
166 Marina del Rey Ct
Clearwater
SV? ,,/? OOR
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Monday, August 25,20088:30 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Legg Mason Proposal File #FLD 2008-02002
-----Original Message-----
From: Ardith Shipley [mailto:wonderchef50@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 20086:51 PM
To: Hibbard, Frank; Doran, John; Petersen, Carlen; Cretekos, George; Gibson, Paul; Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Legg Mason Proposal File #FLD 2008-02002
Dear Mayor, City Council and Community Development Board Members:
Attached is a copy of our letter to the St. Petersburg Editor that was published on Tuesday, August 19, 2008
which expresses a very limited scope of our overall multiple concerns with the proposal of Legg Mason to squeeze
a building on to an 88 foot wide lot thatrequires 200 feet under the City's code. We were shocked to hear that
City Planner, Wayne Wells, "recommended" approval of this and all of the numerous other variances requested by
Legg Mason. We thought that variances are only granted when the applicant can establish a need based on
safety or ecological reasons and are minor in scope. That's the way that it has always worked in other places
that we have lived. We never dreamed that the City would grant variances that sacrifice our neighborhood and
property values so that some out-of-state billion dollar company could flip their property and make a quick profit
at the expense of so many families. Does the City have a policy on granting variances, or is the only guideline to
give developers exactly what they want and ignore the neighborhood and needs of its citizens and residents?
Michael & Ardith Shipley
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with Windows@. Game with Windows
Q /') "j') 00 Q
Letter to the Editor
Clearwater Gazette
August 10, 2008
Cabana Club Redevelopment
We are homesteaded residents of the Isle of Sand Key, directly east from the
Cabana Club which Legg Mason is proposing to redevelop. One of our main
concerns with Legg Mason's plans to build a hotel and restaurant at this site and on
the existing parking lot is the lack of adequate parking that currently exists.
Parking is already a problem with just the restaurant. We have personally
witnessed the cars being double parked and exit lanes being blocked in the parking
lot where the valet has to move one car to get another one out, and also know ~f
cars being parked illegally at the local tennis courts on the island as well as in our
parking lot at the Isle of Sand Key. Legg Mason just snubs its nose at this problem
and seems to have no issue with repeatedly paYing tickets for the illegal parking.
If this is the kind of neighbor Legg Mason is today, then how can they look at us
with a straight face and tell us they are only going to provide eight more parking
spaces than what currently exists? They try to tell us that they are providing more
parking than is needed by a 38 room hotel, but this ignores the fact that their plans
include a 165 seat restaurant that will be open to the public, and that guests from
the 425 room restored Belleview Biltmore Hotel will want to drive here for the
beach or for dinner. To make matters worse, where will the employees and
managers of this hotel/restaurant park their vehicles? Do they think we believe all
these people will be ferried over in some "water taxi" or shuttled over in a bus? If
they can sell the City Planning Department on that one, the City should hire them
to solve the parking problem on Clearwater Beach! Better yet, the Mayor may
want their advice on mass transit solutions for the entire City! !
Michael & Ardith Shipley
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: LikeGERE@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 1 :58 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: (no subject)
Dear Mr. Wells,
I am taking the time to write this letter of support for the Belleview Biltmore
improvement project because I see it as a genuine benefit to the community.
Several months ago a study was conducted to find what would best benefit
Clearwater in generating the eroded tourism income.
It was determined that more mid priced hotel rooms were badly needed, that
past removal of hotels which were replaced by luxury condos had hurt the
economy.
It appears to me that the addition of rooms at the Cabana Club is a direct
positive answer to this dilemma.
I'm really confused as to what the objections TRUL Yare other than people
that have way.' too much time on their hands that oppose any sort of change!
I have visited the web site that is listed on those ugly red protest signs
(which I doubt are actually legal in their placement)
I sent a friendly email to the address on that web site asking how the project
would actually damage or inconvenience them and have received no reply.
I understood their objection to the small strip shopping center south of the
Marriott being removed, i couid understand that some may walk to the
restaurants grocery store etc in that center and that they might be
unconvinced if it were no longer there, that to me is logical.
I live in Indian Rocks Beach and drive by the Cabana Club frequently both
by car and by boat. The Cabana Club property is truly a pleasure to the eyes
as compared to the looming concrete jungle of condos that line the beach.
I look forward to spending a weekend on the beach and relaxing in a cabana
on the sand at the Cabana Club, please do all that is possible to allow this
restoration and improvement project to get under way.
Best personal regards,
Byron Dougherty
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
Q /') 1 /,)()()Q
,fJ: et)IfMIJNfr/ ()EVGJd>hCA.JT .(!oiInD
.fltK7.:J..-' w,~ 72.1 ~
~f 'BfLLY+'B€-77Y
~ t rcHCU
F~ 870 33 'i ~,~ l.
HV G I c;- "'".L-._
...,~~)S"
v~~ 8(MQo 111::-1# &"k(,
(j(J~ R@:JDi3A.Jce I S ()AJI r 'J.. 70 I /5 'i~ GUl!.r Ii. t UD
f '
~J.GAY?w,.. rPe.. Fl-
.
TIlls UAJtr IS 7I-It! CLL!~Er;.T fO ~:; pf(b~sG7)
J,..t:: GG- h'4SON (-Ie 1f:I-.. .
we 'Ft:€L. 1&47 ~ lttJl€'- ,44.iO ~8 T1JrutNT .W L(.
13E A GeE1J.f ./H(.Je.(JvG""c~;- rtJ OlJR. ~f3ANA ~ul3
~ fhVO ~ .AERA.
(J "/frotill rf OF ~ o~p(:;-~ ~ 6JF l'a8tW /.J ~L.l..Jg
Co~ooS Atei:f fA) FIlII~ OF 1l.,r; t!(Ji.P5(1eUC!7rt1~.J,
n, yt1fJR. kt?7l1J t; Au< 19 -p.t, fJLePne w~ If...)
'PAulY< ,lJF 71'-1-1<; ~~{J.r I Hpro\J~ItElJr Tt3 OU f:..
}J,GIJ80t.WOOD#
~~~
. ..,. . .
~I.~ t:;'J"' ;~~~!~ '~J' (~~~>
AUG 1.~) Z008
'C(;p.~~~.~\ :::....;--:. ~,
f'.!;,':' '
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Russ Schoenherr [rschoenherr@wowway.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11 :55 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club Improvements
Just wanted you to know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana Club on
Clearwater Beach. The improvements sound great, and will add very nicely to the area.
Russ & Marilyn Schoenherr
Q/l ,,/')()()Q
Re: Cabana Club Hotel
Page 1 of3
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14,200812:36 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Cabana Club Hotel
----Original Message-----
From: AI Ujewski [mailto:alijewski@medcf.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:24 AM
To: JanBchNews@aol.com; Hibbard, Frank; Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Watkins, Sherry;
Petersen, Carlen
Cc: Cynthia@ProRemLaw.com; Jofamham@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Cabana Club Hotel
TO ALL,
As the founder and first president of the Sand Key Civic Association and a resident of Sand Key for more than
twenty years, I can personally attest to the fact that we have had literally hundreds of Sand Key residents who
have served the best interests of our city in the past and still continue to do so. They have donated thousands of
hours to work on projects to improve our community. Their accomplishments include the beach re-
nourishment, permanent easements on private property to allow all to enjoy our beautiful beach, underground
utilities, public parking, a fire station to reduce the response time, a public park, holiday street lighting paid for
the its citizens, substantial improvement in the beach area just north of the Sailing center, just to name a few. In
addition, the Sand Key Civic Association, in concert with other civic associations took over the responsibility of
operating the Jolly Trolley, substantially improving its service to the community, improving its financial situation
and making it an icon for Clearwater Beach. I mention all of this to re-enforce the fact that our community on
Sand Key is civic minded and has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness and ability to work long and hard for
projects that benefit the community at large. It also demonstrates beyond question that our community is not
opposed to change; we were instrumental in making the changes previously mentioned.
Which brings us to the proposed Cabana Club hotel, which, if allowed, will trample on the rights of its neighbors.
Please compare their proposed changes, that would benefit a select few, to the changes made to date that
continue to benefit the entire city. The requested variances for this project are an insult and a complete
disregard for the rights of those who have complied with the existing rules and regulations. Please do not
trample on the rights of so many who have and still continue to work for the benefit of the entire community.
AI Lijewski
1600 Gulf Boulevard, Suite 1013
Clearwater, FI 323767
727/492-0055
On 8/13/08 7:21 PM, "JanBchNews@aol.com" <JanBchNews@aol.com> wrote:
Counci{ :Mem6ers:
I liave 6een a resident of Sancf7:(ey since 1991 resicfinll in CDan's
Q /1 ,,/")()()Q
Re: Cabana Club Hotel
Page 2 of3
Isfand tliat is tlie neigli60ring 6uifding to tlie proposed new Ca6ana
C{u6 liote[ }Is tlie current structure lias 6een an on-going source of
controversy due to its continued deteriorated condition, it wou14 6e a
wefcome change to liave tlie property improved wit Ii upscafe
renovations.
J{owever, tlie proposed 6uifding does not confonn to tlie 6uifding
envefope in any aspect. (j3uifding codes, regufations, set6ac~, etc. are
an integra{ part of a community's design to maintain continuity and
assure neigli60rs's riglits are not infringed upon or su6jected to
deva{uation. }I governing 60tfy sucli as yourse{ves is efected to oversee
tliat tliese regufations are adliered to and any deviations are in tlie
6est interests of a{[...........not a cliosen few.
In your :Notice to tlie Pu6fic of tlie upcoming liearing appfication, it is
pointed out tliat tlie required 6uifding fot size (6y code) requires a 200
ft. wide rot. granting a variance to construct tliis structure wlien onfy
88ft. is avaifa6fe is preposterous. 71iis is not a variance, tliis is a
tota{ disregard for tlie faws, regufations and what is appropriate for
tne site ana tlie community as a rconot:e, }l 6uifding of tfiis m.agnitude
wouU certainfy 6e intrusive to the neigh60ring fots.
Of course, insu{t is added to injury to further the request to e~eea 3
times the lieight restriction and requesting zero set6ac~ from property
fines. Variances are usua{fy consicferea in liardship cases or where a
few feet are needed to compfete the design. 71iis is not a liaraship case
- it is an ''1 want" scenario so I can ao 'rBig (j3anner" aavertising on
we6 sites, trave{ 6rocliures, etc.
'Yes, as pointed out a6ove, an improveajrenovated, 6eaCh du6 restaurant wouU 6e
wefcomecf. cBut, this fot aoes not accommoaate the proposed pCan. P:ven more so,
appropriate parkinnfor a 125 seat restaurant p{us a 40+ seat outsUfe 6ar and BriCe in
aadition to tlie 38 room hote{ is non-e:{jstent. One of the reasons, the e:{jsting Ca6ana
C{u6 CRgstaurant was never successful was aue to the parRing pr06Cem. Now you1{{ have
residents a{{ afonn qulfcB{v{ (6eyond Sana'lVy) ana hote{ patrons from the 425 room
CBe{CeaircBeffeview cBi{tmore coming to the focation with truCy inaaequate parRing. Pretty
soon, a stop uf/fit wi{{ need to 6e insta{Cea to contro{ the {[ow of traffic.
0/1 1: /,.., 'V\ 0
Re: Cabana Club Hotel
Page 3 of3
}lffowing construction up to and 6eyond tfie seawa{[ can fiave serious impact on tfie
integrity of tfie seawa{[ as we{[ as interfere in any future needed reinforcements and/or
repairs. q'fiis wi{[ affect neigli60ring properties sliouU tlie seawa{[ 6ecome compromised at
any time.
%e insta[fation of ca6anas on tlie 6eacli sfiouU 6e affowed for everyone and every compfe)(
if tliis is to 6e con.sidered. J{owever, tlie request to insta[[ pavers and canvas ca6anas on
25' of 6eacli property west of tlie Coasta[ Construction Contro[ Line not onfy interferes
witli tlie sea turtfe lia6itat and sea oats, it is in opposition to PE:M}lguideCines and tlie
requirements to qua[ify for our 6eacli renourisfiment project.
SliouU tliis app[ication 6e approved, it wi{[ demonstrate tlie City of Cfearwater and its
counci[ mem6ers do not represent its citizens or liave any respect for our codes or
regufations. ~ou are in office to represent tlie 6est interest of tlie taJ(payers and our
neigfi60rlioodS. Por my neigli60rs in (j)an's Isfand and Sand1(ey auRs, I urge you to 6e
rea[istic of wliat is appropriate and in tfie interest of a[[
Jan :M. Newsome
(])an's Isfand #813
1600 qulf (j3[vd.
Cfearwater, PL 33767
727-596-1108
Loo/iJng for a car tliat's sporty, fun and fits in your 6udget? CRgad reviews on}l OL}l utos
<littp:/jautos. aoe com/cars-(WMW-128-2008/expert-remew?
ncia=aofaut000500000000 17> .
Q /1 &:.1'1()()Q
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Thursday, August 14, 200812:37 PM
Wells,Wayne
FW: Cabana Club Restaurant
-----Original Message-----
From: secssp@tampabay.rr.com [mailto:secssp@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:50 AM
To: Hibbard, Frank
Cc: paul.gibson@clearwater.com; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Watkins,
Sherry; Petersen, Carlen
Subject: Cabana Club Restaurant
The proposed changes in zoning are ridiculous We are talking a residential neighborhood
not a downtown commercial location Our beach would be compromised, our lifestyles would
be compromised, our values would be denied and given to the highest bidder Frankly, I
don't believe this is even be considered? Please tell us all that we won't lose our
beachfront to "forced" erosion and/or allow even more autos in a too limited parking area,
we've been here paying our taxes for many years We represent a large percentage of tax
dollars and voting power. Do not dismiss our concerns. Thank you Sharon Pettit; Cabana
Club
1
LANDMARK TOWERS AT SAND KEY
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC
1230 GULF BLVD.
SAND KEY, FLORIDA 33767
August 12,2008
Reference: Case# FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
Honorable Frank Hibbard, Mayor
City Council Members
Sherry Watkins
City Hall
112 S. Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL 33758
Dear Honorable Frank Hibbard, Mayor:
I am writing to you today not to oppose hotels on Sand Key, but to oppose variances that
will eventually damage the island of Sand Key. The CDB should take into serious
consideration, the permeable land which will be lost for the pilings and foundations to
such a large structure proposed by Legg Mason for the size of the property available to be
further developed. The increased blacktop for the parking area also must be factored in.
This area of Sand Key is the narrowest part and is very vulnerable to storm surges
breaching the area and undermining th.e boulevard and possibly dividing Sand Key in
two. Who assumes the responsibility if such consequences occur? Isn't it the city
planners and building department for permitting this over development in such a
geographically sensitive area?
The city forefathers had reasons for the Building and Zoning Codes, not to ignore them,
and effecting a whole new code which may endanger the current residents and property.
Are the tax dollars you are looking to gain really worth this risk?
Taxpayer monies from the federal level were used to pay for beach renourishment on
Sand Key and for Legg Mason to assume they can utilize the beach area of25 feet by an
unknown length is unfair to the residents of Sand Key who access these beaches via the
public walkways which was required because of the use of federal funding. This is a
situation that Legg Mason wants to have private business financial gain at the cost of
the taxpayers.
Respectfully yours,
Arlene Musselwhite
President, Landmark Towers
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 200812:37 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: FLD Case # 2008/02002 1590 Gulf Blvd.
-----Original Message-----
From: ARLENEMUSS [mailto:arlenemuss@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 12:02 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: FLD Case # 2008/ 02002 1590 Gulf Blvd.
Dear Ms. Watkins, Could you please forward the attached letter which I have sent as president of Landmark
Towers on Sand Key. I have serious concerns about the proposed variances Legg Mason has asked for. I
appreciate your assistance in getting my letter to the Mayor, the City Council Members and Nick Fritsch and the
CDB. I am in New York until August 18 so I did not have my Letterhead to use. Thank you very much, Arlene
Musselwhite
It's time to go back to school! Get the latest trends and gadgets that make the grade on AOL Sho2QlDg.
Q 11 .c:;. J')()()Q
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Thursday, August 14, 200812:37 PM
Wells, Wayne
FW: Legg Mason Sand Key Proposal
-----Original Message--
From: Doran, John
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 12:07 PM
To: 'Chris Evans'
Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Manni, Diane
Subject: RE: Legg Mason Sand Key Proposal
Ms. Evans:
Thank you for your comments, but the Legg Mason matter is a matter before the Community Development Board, not the
City Council. To date, there is nothing to suggest that Legg Mason intends to ask for anything that would come before the
City Council.
I have copied your email to Sherry Watkins in the Planning Department; she will makeitavailabletotheCDB,as is lIlost
appropriate.
There will an opportunity for personal public input at the COB meeting on August 19, at which time you can address the
COB on this matter, in person, should you choose.
john doran
Clearwater City Council
Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to and from government officials regarding
government business are public records available to the public and to the media upon request. Your e-mail
communications may be subject to public disclosure.
-----Original Message---
From: Chris Evans [mailto:evans.chris01 @comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 6:22 AM
To: Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Hibbard, Frank
Subject: Legg Mason Sand Key Proposal
This plan is ludicrous and I hope you recognize it as such. The proposed
variances are far beyond reasonable constructing an unsightly edifice which
is inconsistent with the architecture on Sand Key. Yes, the sight is
currently zoned commercial but for a VERY SHORT building within city
ordinances and in fitting with the surronding area.
I live at The Harbour South and can't help but wonder if the proposed
boaUfoot traffic meets safety codes and is wheelchair accessible. The
volume of traffic is inconceivable considering the pathway next to our pool.
PLEASE BE A RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTIVE OF THE CITIZENS AND NEIGHBORS OF SAND
KEY AND VOTE "NO" TO LEGG MASON VARIANCE PROPOSALS.
Thank you,
Maria Evans
1531 Gulf Blvd. #401
Sand Key 33767
1
.....
~
Ultimar Three Condominium Association, Inc.
1560 Gulf Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33767
Phone (727-595-7900 Fax (727-596-1631)
ORIGINAL
RlCEIVED
AU6 14 2008
P6ANNING DiPNm1ENT
CIlY eF a.EAlWA'~
\ugust 14, 2008
:;omrmnty Develq:ment Board
]ty of Clearwater,
112 South Osceola Ave,
]earwater, Ronda
:u.: legg Mason's Plans to Bt.ild a Hotel at 1590 Gulf BNd., Site of the Cabana aub Restaurant
r 0 the Coolmunity Deve\OJIT< Board,
Ne wish to inform you that on August 13, 2008, the Board of Directors of the UI1imar III HomecMners AssociaIion unarimously passed a resolution to
:>PPOSE all of the variances requested in L..egg Mason's application in order to blild a hdeI in 0lI' residential neigtro'hood. Our conOOminill11 property
s located at 1560 Gulf Blvd aqacent to the Cabana CII:b property. We represent 100 resident owners at UItimar III. Please intn:rlJce our objection to
-6Q9 Masm's ~ as a part of the plJD: hearing sche<<lB:I for Tuesday, August 19, 2008 in the City Comci Charrbers.
Specifically, we object to Legg Mason's ~ seeking BR>fovaI for multiple and sigrificant variances to btjd a 38-unit hotel with an awroximate
165 seat ac:cessay restaurant If approved, a trarlsfortnaion cI 0lI' residential neighborhood will be launched brirgng with it increased buildng density,
DItionaI cxmmeroiaI activity, traffic, and beach intrusion.
Ne beIieIIe we have exarTined this issue OOjectively and what we see is an attempt to increase the value of the subject property for resale purposes.
~for a moment, what is ~ted:
~ 8 redIction to the north side se1back;
~ a redIction to the west rear se1back;
~ a redIction to the east front setback;
~ a redIction to the east front perimeter buffer,
~ a redIction to the north side perineter buffer;
~ 8 reWction to the wiclh of the inlerior landscape islands;
~ an unrealistic height increase that will result in a 9 or 10 story buildng; and,
and 25 feet of beach area seaward of the Coastal CoosInJction ConlroI Une for cabana that will not be taken down overnigIt
We stbnit that if you grant such extreme variances, you wi! be setting a slippery slope precedent that wiD invite simiar overreaching deveI~
proposals throughout Sand Key.
That said, we would wek:ane redevelqxnent on this site wittin the City's Code and without deviations. Ideas such as a 4 or 5 star restaurant, a private
beach clt:b, 8 smaller hotel, spa, or beach villas have been suggested.
Please oonsider this action cI our Board of Directors as an i~t representation eX the ac:jacent property owners who seek 00y to preserve our
residential neighborhood, our prqlerty values, our safety, and our environment
v....t>GW'1 ~ Vl~ ~..e/l'.{~
Ultimar Three CondominilJn Association, 100.
Board of Directors
c: City eX aearwater, Director of P1anring
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Cynthia Churchward [cindy@churchward.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:37 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Legg Mason development of the Cabana Grill on Sand Key
Dear Mr Wells,
I am writing to you to express my complete support of the plans by Legg Mason and their proposed development of the Cabana Grill (Beach Club)
on Sand Key. It is a rare opportunity indeed to have a developer who is forward thinking and presenting a well thought out design for the
redevelopment of the existing Beach Club property. The new design plans will significantly improve the beauty, functionality and usability of the
current property. An additional point of great importance to consider as well, is the connection of the developer Legg Mason who is also
redeveloping the Belleview Biltmore Resort and Country Club. These are all important historical properties that Legg Mason is developing and the
significant ties between the properties should not be under estimated or taken for granted. As a citizen of Clearwater for the last 41 years and a
current member of the Belleview Biltmore for many years, my husband and I am in total support of all the current development plans that Legg
Mason has proposed for the above mentioned properties. It has been a sad time indeed to watch the properties deteriorate steadily under the previous
ownership and my husband and I welcome the improvement all around as well as appreciate the restoration plans for the Hotel as proud citizens who
recognize it's historical signifigance.
I would greatly appreciate you support in this matter that is before you as our representative.
Thank You,
Jack & Cynthia S Churchward
1730 Sherwood Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
iackfaichurchward.com or cindy(c4churchward.com
727-458-4664 or 727-455-5340
R/19/200R
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bridget Lopez [Bridget_Lopez@dcf.state.f1.us]
Thursday, August 14, 2008 1 :27 PM
Wells, Wayne
Legg Mason and the Cabana Project
~
pic13290.jpg
"I support Legg Mason and the Cabana project."
Thank you very much,
Bridget Lopez
(Embedded image moved to file: pic13290.jpg)
NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written
communications to or from state officials are public records that will be
disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail communications
may be subject to public disclosure.
1
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: bbandsb306@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:21 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: re: Cabana Club Permits
-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From: bbandsb306@comcast.net
To: W ayne.W ells@myc1earwater.com
Subject: re: Cabana Club Permits
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:19:55 +0000
Just so you know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana Club on
Clearwater Beach. It is owned by our association and the plans we have seen can only
improve the Cabana Club as well as the area.The improvements will also add a couple of
great restaurants which the area needs. Please approve the permits so this project can
move forward. Thank you.
Bill and Shirley Barnhart
8/18/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:28 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Reinhardt [mailto:eagleflying@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 20081:22 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry; Hibbard, Frank; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Gibson, Paul; Petersen, Carlen
Cc: JoEllen Farnham; Cynthia Remley
Subject: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd)
Dear Mayor, Council Members and COB,
Although I am not opposed to Legg Mason's right to construct on the property at 1590 Gulf Blvd, I am totally
opposed to the excessive variances (deviations) that they are requesting in terms of size. heiqht. parkind and
setbacks. Their request to use property 25 feet seaward of the CCCL is totally inexcusable.
According to Dr. Nicole Elko: The Erosion Control Line (ECl) now acts as the property line
between upland private and state/public beach land. The distance from the CCCl to the
MHWl at 1590 Gulf Blvd is presently approximately 110ft. The distance from the CCCl to the
MHWl at the Sheraton Resort is 900 ft.
This shows how narrow the beach is at 1590 Guf Blvd. This area is the most fragile part of Sand Key and would
be the most likely to suffer the worst damage to the island in a severe storm. Past history of beach erosion has
shown that the beach eiOdes in this area and sand shifts to the north.
Legg Mason has stated in a meeting at the Belleview Biltmore on July 8th that the "boutique hotel" and amenities
are IMPORTANT to the success of the historic hotel in Belleview. Why should the government of Clearwater put
itself at risk to further the success of a corporation whose main focus is in Belleview? It appears that any
advantage in tax revenue would go to Belleview rather than to Clearwater.
I strongly urge that the Community Development Board deny the extreme variances requested by Legg Mason.
Sincerely yours,
Mary Reinhardt
8/18/2008
Page 1 of}" Z--
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 20084:23 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Cabana Club Employees' Parking Tickets at Bay Park
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth G. Protonentis [mailto:Ken@ProRemLaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 20084:16 PM
To: Hibbard, Frank; Doran, John; Petersen, Carlen; Cretekos, George; Gibson, Paul
Cc: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Cabana Club Employees' Parking Tickets at Bay Park
Dear Mayor Hibbard, City Commissioners and Community Development Board ("CDB") Members:
As Legg Mason's application for multiple and significant deviations comes before the CDB for a
final decision, I think it is important that you understand how limited and how problematic the current
parking situation is at this less than an acre site. It is also important that you understand how Legg
Mason circumvents the City's parking rules for its employees. On Friday evening May 2, 2008 about
7:30 pm and shortly before sunset, my wife and I walked across the street to the Cabana Club Bar &
Grill where there are 2 restaurants, one formal, and one casual upstairs with the James Peterson Blues
Band playing on Friday night, the same band that has been playing there on Fridays for over a year. We
met the Maitre D', Michel, as we entered the lower level. We have known Michel for many years and
have beep members of the Dining Club that was established in 2002 when the restaurants reopened. We
went upstairs to enjoy the live entertainment and ordered our food and a bottle of wine after securing the
last available table.
About 30 minutes later the general manager, Martin Smith. appeared in shorts and a Belleview
Biltmore golf shirt. He came over and sat down with the people at the table right next to us. After some
conversation, he looked over at us, stood up and stepped over to talk with us. We also stood up, shook
hands and talked, hearing about his enjoyable afternoon on the golf course. My wife relayed to Martin
that she and I had just been talking about the terrific job that Michel has done in bringing in business
through the casual outdoor restaurant with live entertainment, and how great a treat this has been for the
locals. Martin responded that yes it was great, in fact so great that management has its employees park
in the parking lot of Bay Park, which is just north of 1581 Gulf Boulevard on the intercoastal side.
Martin added that lately he has had to write $20 checks every night to cover the parking tickets his
employees have been getting from the City for parking in Bay Park. Martin said that he did not know
what happened or why his employees are getting parking tickets now, because previously it was not a
problem. He speculated that maybe the City changed its rules to no parking after dusk. We concluded
our conversation cordially, and Martin went back to the next table carrying on a conversation with the
people sitting there. The clock said 9:00 pm when we returned home.
Bottom line is that the parking has been inadequate for the existing restaurants which seat
slightly fewer people than the proposed restaurant will, excluding the existing banquet room upstairs
that is seldom used. Adding only 6 more parking spaces will definitely not solve the parking problems
for a 165 seat restaurant, a 38 room hotel, guests arriving at the beach from the 425 unit hotel complex
in Belleair, and the 20 or more employees servicing the hotel and restaurant. An additional
neighborhood concern is that allowing commercial parking use at Bay Park will jeopardize future
8/18/2008
Page 2 off L
funding for beach renourishment projects and may cause Pinellas County to have to refund
monies already received for beach renourishment projects, if such funds are not already in jeopardy due
to the parking restrictions being mocked by Legg Mason. We need to preserve and maintain our public
beach, and we cannot risk losing desperately needed funds by condoning unauthorized commercial
parking on public land.
It is also my understanding that the City Planning Department may recommend approval ofLegg
Mason's plans because of the erroneous belief that there will be no parking problem because Legg
Mason will use a water taxi to ferry guests back and forth from the mainland hotel in Belleair. I am the
Commodore of the Harbour Yacht Club of Sand Key, Inc. and a Director of the Harbour Condominium
Association, Inc., the entities that respectively own the docks and real property across which Legg
Mason now wants a commercial easement. I respectfully submit the attached opinion from our attorney,
which clearly establishes that Legg Mason has absolutely no easement rights to a dock or a right of way
across our private residential property. Legg Mason has not produced any documents in this file as of
July 14,2008 establishing that they own any property or have any ownership rights to a dock or property
from which a commercial water taxi can be operated.
I respectfully request that you deny all of the deviations from the Code that are being requested
by Legg Mason and that you encourage them to redevelop this site within the Code, and without
requests for variances. Thank you.
Kenneth G. Protonentis
PROTONENTIS & REMLEY, P.A.
1591 Gulf Boulevard, Penthouse 2
Clearwater, Florida 33767-2997
Office: (727) 596-3435
Facsimile: (727) 596-2076
Cell: (727) 215-9700
Email: Ken@ProRemLaw.com
www.ProRemLaw.com
Confidentiality Note
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the
recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication,
or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-
send this communication to the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.
8/18/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Bruce Larson [blarson@larsonco.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 8:16 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Sir, please consider this a vote in support for the proposed improvements to the Cabana Club on Sand Key.
Bruce Larson
Q /1 Q /,,)()(\Q
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Walt Poff [waltpoff@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 5:07 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club
Dear Mr. Wayne Wells
Just wanted you to know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana
Club on Clearwater Beach. The improvements sound great, and will add very nicely to
the area.
Thanks and Very Best Regards,
Walt
Walter Poff, P .E.
Q /1'7 /')()()Q
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Friday, August 15, 20088:08 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Case #FLD2008-02002
-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Pappas [mailto:juliepappas@suncoastsurfrider.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:15 PM
To: Frank.Hibard@myclealWater.com; Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Watkins, Sherry; Petersen,
Carlen
SUbject: Case #FLD2008-02002
Dear Clearwater City Council Members,
Good evening. My name is Julie Pappas, I am the chapter secretary of Suncoast Chapter of the Surf rider Foundation. Weare
an international not for profit organization founded in 1984 whose mission is for the protection and enjoyment of the worlds
oceans, waves and beaches for all people through conservation, activism, research, and education.
Recently, other not for profit organizations contacted our chapter and presented Case#:FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.). In
brief, the case is about the reconstruction of the Cabana Club Restaurant site, on Sand Key, and the related ferry boat in the
intercostals waterway.
Our chapter opposes the building proposed plan of going beyond the allowed variances where it comes to infringing on the
public beach immediately west of the site. Encroaching towards the Gulf rnay inhibit wildlife and shorten the beach.
With the buildings being so near to the shoreline the natural beach dynamics may suffer. Closer buildings mean the
possibility of more lighting on the Gulf side of the site. Several sea turtles chose the warm sand of Sand Key to nest their
eggs this year. False moonlight attracts hatchling sea turtles away from the Gulf.
Sand Key, on a regular renourishment schedule, isn't very wide to begin with. But despite this fact, healthy dune habitat can
be seen all up and down the beach. According to the case, the plan calls for twenty-five feet of public beach for semi-
permanent, private cabanas. Twenty-five feet on what would be healthy dunes, thus more natural armoring, if they would
prohibit people trampling it, as they do now. rne encroachment may lead to a narrower beach which would lead to, one couid
suppose, more manmade beach armoring to gain back the protection of the shore.
Clearwater is a [me city because folks like you have the say in what matters. Consider the health of the beach when deciding
to grant the extended variances on this case. We ask you to personally view the area of concern. And decide on the side of
preserving what's natural on the cities proud coastline. Generations of plants, animals and people will benefit far better in the
long run.
Respectfully,
Julie Pappas
Suncoast Chapter
Surfrider Foundation
R/17 !?()()R
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: ETCSB@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 2:20 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club on Sand Key
Dear Mr. Wells,
We are writing to express our support for the proposed new Cabana Club on Sand Key. We are members of the
Belleview Biltmore Resort and have every reason to believe that the proposal would be done tastefully.
We are sorry to see what has become of Sand Key (High rise condos) and think that a small hotel would be a
good thing.
Sincerely,
Sally & Blaine Duggan
2118 Egret Drive
Clearwater, FL
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
R/l 7 !?()()R
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Friday, August 15, 200812:34 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Cabana Club Sand Key
-----Original Message-----
From: D&D Hopkins [mailto:dhop166@msn.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15,200810:57 AM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Cabana Club Sand Key
Re: Cabana Club Sand Key Remodel
I have reviewed the proposed redevelopment of the Cabana club. I am not opposed to the
. redevelopment of the property by legg Mason, however it must be done within existing
codes and standards. I am opposed to the granting of any variances from City or State,
building or zoning codes for the redevelopment.
I live across Gulf Blvd in the Marina del Rey townhouses, thus I will be impacted by any
redevelopment.
The City and state codes have been established after due consideration by elected
authorities and should be followed.
In particular i am opposed to the variance of any development seaward of the eeL I n1S IS
a line that is established to reduce impacts on coastal erosion. The Cabana Club location is
at a more vulnerable area were coastal erosion has occurred in the past. When the shore
was nourished a few years ago, the shore line had eroded up to the seawall at the adjacent
Dans Island condo. The erosion was continuing toward the Cabana Club property. Due to
the public monies spent to nourish the beach, the private seawalls were saved.
Construction beyond the CCl increases the risk of shore erosion.
I am also opposed to the encroachment of a tall building onto the right-of-way for the Public
beach access between the CC and Dans Island condo. The code setback must be
maintained on the south side of the property.
Thank you for your interest in serving the City.
David Hopkins
166 Marina del Rey Ct
Clearwater
SVl 7 I?()()R
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: james sarafolean Uim-arlenesarf@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 200810:47 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
We just wanted to let you know how excited we are about the improvements to the Cabna Club on
Clearwater Beach.
Jim & Arlene Sarafolean
R/17 nOOR
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: JHornb1929@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 7:43 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: (no subject) .
WE CAN NOT IMAGINE ANYONE OBJECTING TO IMPROVING THE CABANA GRILL AND THE HOTEL.
THEY SHOULD BE, AS WE ARE, THRILLED TO HAVE THIS HAPPEN. WHAT CAN THEY BE THINKING TO
NOT BACK THIS NEW CONSTRUCION AND RECONSTRUCION. WE WERE MEMBERS OF BELLEAIR
COUNTRY CLUB FOR MANY YEARS BEFORE MOVING TO THE BELLEVIEW BILTMORE COURSE. WE
JUST CAN'T BELIEVE A MEMBER AT EITHER PLACE WOULD OBJECT. TOOKIE AND JOHN HORNBUCKLE
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
R/17/700R
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Friday, August 15, 2008 2:36 PM
Wells. Wayne
FW: Legg Mason Sand Key Proposal
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Evans [mailto:evans.chrisOl@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, August IS, 2008 2:32 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Fw: Legg Mason Sand Key Proposal
From: Chris Evans [mailto:evans.chrisOl@comcast.net]
Sent: Thu 8/14/2008 6:21 AM
To: Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Hibbard, Frank
Subject: Legg Mason Sand Key Proposal
This plan is ludicrous and I hope you recognize it as such. The proposed
variances are far beyond reasonable constructing an unsightly edifice which
is inconsistent with the architecture on Sand Key. Yes, the sight is
currently zoned commercial but for a VERY SHORT building within city
ordinances and in fitting with the surrounding area NEIGHBORHOOD. .
I live at The Harbour South and can't help but wonder if the proposed
boat/foot traffic meets safety codes and is wheelchair accessible. The
volume of traffic is inconceivable considering the pathway next to our pool.
PLEASE BE A RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTlVE OF THE CITIZENS AND NEIGHBORS OF SAND
KEY AND VOTE "NO" TO LEGG MASON VARIANCE PROPOSALS.
WE LIKE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AS IT IS. IF I WANTED A TOURIST AREA I COULD HAVE
BOUGHT ON CLEARWATER BEACH.
Thank you,
Maria Evans
1531 Gulf Blvd. #401
Sand Key 33767
1
Wells. Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
rhodescollege@aol.com
Friday, August 15, 2008 2:57 PM
Wells, Wayne
I support Legg Mason and their plans for the beach hotel.
Torn Clary
1
August 11, 2008
Page 1 of3
Wells, Wayne
From: Jim Strenski [strenski@jjconsulting.org]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 20083:24 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry; Wells, Wayne
Cc: Hibbard, Frank; Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Petersen, Carlen
Subject: SON Response to SK Residents FINAL (08 11 08)
Re: Cabana Club Hotel Plans--- Please carefully consider the attached response to the 8/6 Martin Smith
letter re: Legg Mason's hotel plans. This SON response addresses a variety of important points that
deserve the attention of all CDB members, points not addressed by Legg Mason. May I also respectfully
question Legg Mason's last minute postponment of the 8/19 CDB hearing to 9/16/08? It wasn't for lack
of a quorum... A nu mber of concerned citizens built their week around the August date. What's to
prevent Legg Mason from asking for additional postponments to suit their needs? Don't citizen's needs
dererve respect? Thanks for your time. James B. Strenski, #1205, 1200 Gulf Blvd.
August 11, 2008
Dear Concerned Neighbors of Sand Key:
Weare writing to you in response to a letter you may have received from Martin Smith, Managing
Director of the Belleview Biltmore Resort. Legg Mason owns the Cabana Club Restaurant property and the
Belleview Biltmore Resort. Save Our Neighborhood (SON) is assuming Mr. Smith is speaking on behalf of
the owner and his employer, Legg Mason. Mr. Smith's letter is very disconcerting and we will do our best to
address each issue that is raised and bring to light issues that are not addressed.
Use of the Beach: Legg Mason intends to place canvas cabanas, plant grass and install pavers on 25' of
beach property west of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). The purpose of the CCCL is to
protect the beach and property and that is why it is regulated by the state. The cabanas would not be
removed at night and only in case of storms. This part of the beach is habitat for sea turtle nests and sea
oats. Relying on the legalese argument, Legg Mason is technically correct that this is not a "taking", but a
"use" of the beach because it falls within Legg Mason's property lines. However, we fail to see the practical
difference in terms of the effect on the beach. Historically, this is the .narrowest part of the beach on the
island. Presently, it measures 110' in comparison to the 900' width at the north end ofthe island.
Parking: Legg Mason says that 56 parking spaces on the property exceed the City's code requirement of 38
spaces and the actual parking demand for a hotel of this size. They are correct that the Code requires one
parking space per hotel room. What Legg Mason doesn't tell you is that its proposed restaurant is much
larger than necessary to serve its hotel patrons. It is defining the restaurant as an "accessory" use and linking
it to the Belleview Biltmore Hotel in Belleair to avoid providing parking for restaurant guests. An example
of an accessory use restaurant would be "Rusty's" at the Sheraton on Sand Key where the number of hotel
rooms exceeds the number of restaurant seats. Legg Mason's July 14th plans show restaurants with 165
seats, which is far more seats than necessary for a 38 room hotel. The restaurant will be open to guests from
the 425 room Belleview Biltmore and the public. Applying the common sense test - where do 20-25
employees, the Cabana Club Hotel guests, the Belleview Biltmore Hotel guests, and the public who frequent
the restaurant, park their vehicles? Legg Mason's answer is that it will shuttle its employees and the
Belleview Biltmore guests, however, it is disingenuous to claim all employees, managers and hotel guests
with vehicles, will use the shuttle. And where will the shuttle buses park? This is another example of Legg
Mason's failure to act as a good neighbor. Our community will suffer the results of insufficient parking.
8/1 7/2008
August 11, :WU~
Page 2 of3
Height: According to Legg Mason, the proposed hotel is NOT "100 feet tall" or a "lO-story high
restaurant/hotel complex." Legg Mason says it is a "boutique" hotel that is only 67 feet high, or 6 stories
over one story of parking). Again, Legg Mason is using the Code language to circumvent the answer to the
question that the neighbors have been asking for months - How high will the building be? Practical people
think of building height from the ground to the top of the roof. Simple math says 14 feet (parking) + 67 feet
(building) + 10 feet (to top ofroofline) = 91 feet give or take. Using Dan's Island on the south side of the
property as a bench mark, the roof line falls somewhere between the ninth and tenth floor of that neighboring
condominium building (90' -1 00 ').
Setbacks and Location of Building: It is impossible to build Legg Mason's proposed hotel/restaurant on
this small site without numerous deviations from the City's Code. What is not mentioned in their letter is that
the City's Code requires them to have a lot 200 feet wide in order to build a structure of the size proposed.
In order to squeeze this oversized building onto this small site, Legg Mason is asking for a reduction of the
lot width requirement to 88 feet. As a result they also have to ask for more deviations to the code in the form
of "setbacks" for three out of four of the property lines:
a. The Code requires that the parking lot pavement be setback 25 feet from Gulf Boulevard. They
want that requirement reduced to 5 feet.
b. On the north side ofthe building the Code requires them to be set back from their property line,
zero to ten feet. They want that requirement reduced to Zero.
c. On the west/Gulf side, they want to build the hotel building right up to the Coastal Construction
Control Line. The Code requires them to build it back 20 feet.
The bottom line is that there is nothing "boutique" or "modest" about this proposed hotel on this site.
Dock: Legg Mason says it has deleted all references to the use of the dock on Gulf Boulevard from its
pending application "due to the community input and concerns" and after evaluating its options will, once,
again address this issue. What Legg Mason does not tell you is: 1) they made an offer to purchase an
alternative piece of property on the same canal that has not been withdrawn; and 2) that eleven days after
making this statement in their Julyresubmission of their application to the City, their attorney sent a letter to
the Condominium property to which the dock at issue abuts threatening to move forward with an application
for the permits and to begin using the dock. Thus, their public statements that they are not pursuing use of
the dock at this time is disingenuous. There appears to be no reason to believe that Legg Mason has
abandoned an earlier stated intention of ferrying its guests from its 425 hotel rooms at the Belleview
Biltmore Resort down a canal that is exclusively residential with private marinas and manatees enjoying a
habitat that sustains them.
Adverse Financial Impact on Neighborhood: What we fail to see in Legg Mason's letter is any reference
to the significant financial harm that will be caused to the home value of over 100 families who live in the
residential properties that surround this less than one acre piece of commercial property should this
hotel/restaurant be constructed as planned.
Concerns of the Community: In addition to the contrary positions Legg Mason has taken publicly and
privately regarding its consideration of the "community concerns" on the dock issue, Legg Mason denied a
request by SON for a public meeting in July on Sand Key, or even in Clearwater, to allow Legg Mason's
final building plans to be presented and reviewed with Sand Key residents. Instead, Legg Mason held the
meeting at the Belleview Biltmore Resort where the majority of attendees were not Sand Key residents, and
attendance was small.
Take It Or Leave It: Legg Mason conducted two public presentations on Sand Key in February and March
before the plans were final in July. At both meetings, residents asked if Legg Mason would consider another
redevelopment plan, but that was summarily dismissed with the attitude of "take it or leave it." If Legg
Mason had been a good neighbor and engaged the community in a true dialogue, they would have learned
that the community welcomes redevelopment of this site within the City's .code and without deviations.
Ideas such as a 4- 5 star restaurant, private beach club, smaller hotel,. spa, or, beach villas have been made.
Legg Mason's letter implies that if you do not accept their proposed hotel, your only option is a gas station,
liquor store, nightclub or a used car lot. Again, this is another disingenuous response as such uses would be
economically unrealistic considering the site is valuable beach front property.
8/17/2008
August 11, 200~
Page 3 of3
SON supports the redevelopment of this site within the parameters of the City's Code, but, without the need
for deviations and for our community to be engaged in an open and honest dialogue that does not hide the
real intentions of the developer. We hope this response has been informative and helpful.
Sincerely,
Cynthia L. Remley on behalf of SA VE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD
8/17/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:59 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Case #: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Wanda Marzouk [mailto:wandamarzouk@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14,20081:10 AM
To: Watkins, Sherry
SUbject: Case #: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
We are home owners in Ultimar 3 (1560 Gulf Blvd.) and our unit overlooks the Cabana Club. We
strongly object to the approval of any variances to change the use ofthe mentioned property. Any
change would have a negative impact on our property values and drastically obstruct our views.
Such use would bring noise and more traffic. Also, increase the parking problem, as it is now, our
guests have to park across the street in the town park. We ask that the City Council reconsider these
variances and zoning changes. Respectfully, Youssef and Wanda Marzouk
8/1412008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:59 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Case #FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
-----Original Message-----
From: lorrainemwasserman@comcast.net [mailto: lorrainemwasserman@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 11:05 PM
To: Hibbard, Frank
Cc: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Case #FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
Dear Mr. Hibbard,
I am writing this letter with hopes some one can do something about our gorgeous view that may me
ruined for pure profit. We have lived at Dan's Island for 17 years, and would love to continue living
there, if we have the view we paid for. We don't want another Miami at Sand Key Beach, we do not
need buildings sky high. We have a perfect little beach, and we all want to keep it that way.
The parking will be a problem, we don't need hundreds of people using it as a public beach, and that's
what will happen.
We are pleading that this ridiculous request/project is stopped immediately. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Lorraine M & Don Wasserman
PH3
8/1412008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:58 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Legg Mason Project: 1590 Gulf Blvd.
----.,.Original Message-----
From: RTARSIN@aol.com [mailto:RTARSIN@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 8:40 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Frank.Hibbard@my.Clearwater.com; Gibson, Paul; Cretekos, George
Subject: Legg Mason Project: 1590 Gulf Blvd.
Mr. Mayor, Members of the City Council and Community Development Board,
I have read the warnings posted by S.O.N., as well as the Letter to the Editor of the Clearwater Gazette written
by Martin Smith of the Belleview Biltmore, and the rebuttal by S.O.N. I have to agree with the latter, because I
have heard Mr. Smith and Legg Mason's attorneys speak on at least three occasions, and the story is never the
same. On one occasion, they described a small, fashionable "Boutique Hotel", and at the next meeting, Mr
Smith stated: "If we are to compete with international tourist destinations like Dubai"..A big stretch from a tiny
little boutique hotel and restaurant. He also promised vast riches from such enterprises which would be of
great benefit to our children and their education. I was reminded of the biblical story about Christ: after fasting
forty days in the desert he was approached by SATAN, who promised Him a huge banquet and unimaginable
riches if only...... .
I don't want my home turned into Dubai, a point I made at that meeting. I don't want my neighborhood turned
into an international tourist designation, nor do I want the gambling, prostitution, conspicuous consumption, and
excesses that go along with it. I don't want palm tree shaped islands in the Gulf. I, as well as all Sand Key
residents, depend on you to enforce the existing code and not let developers turn our homes into whatever can
make them the most money. Minor variances to make an improvement are acceptable, but do not allow them
to rewrite the code to steal our beach, our waterways, and our way of life.
Bob and Anne Tarsin
1200 Gulf Blvd.
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/1412008
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:58 AM
Wells, Wayne
FW: Case #: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd. )
-----Original Message-----
From: Yong Sun [mailto:y_sun@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 8:26 PM
To: Hibbard, Frank; Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George;
Watkins, Sherry; Petersen, Carlen
Subject: re: Case #: FLD2008-02002 ( 1590 Gulf Blvd. )
Hi Everyone,
I appreciat if you can have a look of my concern about the new Legg Mason's hotel.
The size of the proposed building is too big for the lot because they only have
88 feet to build on and the code requires a 200 foot wide lot.
The height of the proposed building is too tall. The code limits them to 25 feet
and building something 100 feet or 10 stories high will hurt surrounding property values.
There is not enough parking now. Adding a 38 room hotel but only 8 parking
spaces makes the problem worse.
Taking 25 feet of public beach restored with taxpayers' dollars should be
stopped.
Operating a ferry boat for guests from over 450 hotel rooms on a canal where all
of the properties are residential.
Thanks,
Yong Sun
1
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14,20087:58 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Cabana Club Hotel
-----Original Message-----
From: JanBchNews@aol.com [mailto:JanBchNews@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:22 PM
To: Hibbard, Frank; Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Watkins, Sherry; Petersen, Carlen
Cc: Cynthia@ProRemLaw.com; Jofarnham@yahoo.com
Subject: Cabana Club Hotel
Counci{ 9f1em6ers:
I Fiave Geen a resident of Sand'1(ey since 1991 residing in (])an's Isfand tfiat is tfie neigfi60ring 6uiUing
to tfie proposed new CaGana C{u6 fiote[ }Is tfie current structure fias Geen an on-going source of
controversy due to its continued deteriorated condition, it wou{d Ge a wefcome cFiange to fiave tfie
property improved witfi ups cafe renovations.
J{owever, tfie proposed 6uiUing does not conform to tfie 6uiUing envefope in any aspect. CJ3uiUing
codes, regufations, set6ac~, etc. are an integra{ part of a community's design to maintain continuity
and assure neigfi60rs's rigfits are not infringed upon or su6jected to deva{uation. )lgoveming 60dy sucfi
as yoursefves is efected to oversee tfiat tfiese regufations are adfiered to and any deviations are in tfie
Gest interests of a{C......... not a cfiosen few.
In your ~otice to tfie CFuG{ic of tfie upcoming tiearing app{ication, it is pointed out tFiat tfie required
GuiUing fat size (6y code) requires a 200ft. wide fat. (]ranting a variance to construct tfiis
structure wfien onEy 88 ft. is avaifaGfe is preposterous. rrfiis is not a variance, tfiis is a tota{ disregard
for tfie faws, regufations and wfiat is appropriate for tfie site and tfie community as a wfiofe. }I
Guifding of tfiis magnitude wou{d certainEy Ge intrusive to tfie neigfi60ring fats.
Of course, insu{t is added to injury to jurttier ttie request to e~eed 3 times tfie fieigfit restriction and
requesting zero set6ac~ from property fines. Variances are usua{Ey consUfered in FiardSfiip cases or
wfiere a few feet are needed to compfete tfie design. rrfiis is not a Fianfsfiip case - it is an "1 want"
scenario so I can do 'mig CJ3anner" advertising on we6 sites, trave{ 6rocfiures, etc.
ryes, as pointed out aGove, an improved/renovated, 6eacfi du6 restaurant wou{d 6e wefcomed. CJ3ut, tfiis
fat does not accommodate tfie proposed pfan. P.ven more so, appropriate parl(jngfor a 125 seat
restaurant p{us a 40+ seat outsUfe Gar and gri{[ in addition to tfie 38 room fiotef is non-ewtent. One of
tfie reasons, tfie ewting Ca6ana C{u6 c.R.#staurant was never successful was due to tfie parl(jng pr06fem.
~ow you 'f{ Fiave resUfents a{[ afang gulf CJ3{vd (6eyond Sand'1(ey) and fiotef patrons from tfie 425 room
(Beffeair (Beffeview CJ3i{tmore coming to tfie facation witfi truEy inadequate parl(jng. {}7etty soon, a stop
8/14/2008
Page 2 of2
{iglit wi{{ neea to 6e insta{fea to contro{ tlie fCow of traffic.
Jl{Cowing construction up to ant{ 6eyona tlie seawa{[ can /iave serious impact on tlie integrity of tlie
seawa{{ as wer{ as interfere in any future neeaea reinforcements ana/or repairs. '11iis wi{{ affect
neigfi60ring properties sliouU tlie seawa{{ 6ecome compromisea at any time.
'11ie insta{[ation of ca6anas on tfie 6eacli sliouU 6e a{fowea for everyone ana every compfeJ( if tfiis is to
6e consUferea. J{owever, tlie request to insta{{ pavers ana canvas ca6anas on 25' of 6eacli property west
of tlie Coasta{Construction Contro{ Line not onEy interferes witli tlie sea turtfe lia6itat ana sea oats, it
is in opposition to PE.:MJlguUfeCines ana tfie requirements to quaCify for our 6eacfi renourisliment
project.
SliouU tliis appCication 6e approved; it wi{[ aemonstrate tlie City of Cfearwater ana its counci{ mem6ers
ao not represent its citizens or liave any respect for our coaes or reguCations. rr'ou are in office to
represent tlie 6est interest of tlie taxpayers ana our neigli60rlioodS. Por my neigli60rs in Van s IsCana
ana Sana 1(ey aCiRg, I urge you to 6e reaEistic of w/iat is appropriate ana in tlie interest of a{[
Jan r:M. :Newsome
Van's IsCana #813
1600 (julf (j3{va.
CCearwater, PL 33767
727-596-1108
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/1412008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:57 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Opposition to Legg Mason Proposal Ref Cabana Club Property Case #:FLD2008-02002
-----Original Message-----
From: g collins [mailto:gfcollins@att.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:06 PM
To: Cretekos, George; Doran, John; Gibson, Paul; Hibbard, Frank; Petersen, Carlen
Cc: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Opposition to Legg Mason Proposal Ref Cabana Club Property Case #:FLD2008-02002
Mr Mayor and Members of the City Council, Members of the Community Development Board, et al -
Once again the residents of the community of Sand Key have been called into action, and once again we stand
united in opposition to what is being proposed by Legg Mason at the current site of the Cabana Club.
While I don't need to regurgitate all the facts in this case, suffice it to say that what Legg Mason is proposing is
akin to trying to force a very large square peg into a rather small, round hole. They can push, and shove, and use
their mighty corporate machine to grease the facts, but it is what it is and it just doesn't fit!
It doesn't fit the character, it doesn't fit the space, and it certainly doesn't fit the code.
Legg Mason cannot be allowed to have it their way to the irreversible detriment - personal and financial - of the
thousands of people who call Sand Key home. You cannot allow them to do that to this community and the
surrounding environment!
Please continue to hear the united voice of the residents of Sand Key and send Legg Mason back to the drawing
board to come up with a more suitable, more community-friendly, code compliant development plan for this
property.
Thank you for your time!
John Collins
1200 Gulf Blvd
8/14/2008
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:00 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Case #:FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Wanda Marzouk [mailto:wandamarzouk@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 1:40 AM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Fw: Case #:FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Wanda Marzouk <wandamarzouk@J1ahoo.com>wrote:
From: Wanda Marzouk <wandamarzouk@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: Case #:FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
To: Carlen.Petersen@myc1earwater.com
Date: Thursday, August 14,2008, 1 :38 AM
--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Wanda Marzouk <wandamarzouk@J1ahoo.com> wrote:
I From: Wa.l1da Ma.rzouk <wa.l1da.1Jlarzouk@ya.l}oo.com>
Subject: Fw: Case #:FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
To: George.Cretekos@myc1e3.lWater.com
Date: Thursday, August 14,2008, 1 :38 AM
--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Wanda Marzouk <wandamarzouk@J1ahoo~com> wrote:
From: Wanda Marzouk <wandamarzouk@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: Case #:FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
To: John.Doran@myc1earwater.com
Date: Thursday, August 14,2008, 1:36 AM
--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Wanda Marzouk <wandamarzouk@J1ahoo.com> wrote:
From: Wanda Marzouk <wandamarzouk@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: Case #:FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
To: Pau1.Gibson@myc1e3.lWater.com
Date: Thursday, August 14,2008, 1 :35 AM
8/1412008
Page 2 of2
--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Wanda Marzouk <wandamarzouk@yahoo.com>
wrote:
From: W~da Marzouk <wandamarzouk@yahoo.com>
Subject: Case #:FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
To: Frank.Hibbard@myclearwater.com
Date: Thursday, August 14,2008, 1:32 AM
We are home owners in Ultimar 3 (1560 Gulf Blvd) and our unit
overlooks the Cabana Club. We strongly object to the approval
of any variances to change the use of the mentioned property.
Any change would have a negative impact on our property
values and drastically obstruct our views. Such use would bring
noise and more traffic, which Gulf Bou1evard is not able to
accommodate. It would also increase our parking problem, as it
is now, our guests have to park across the street in the town
park. We ask the City Council to please reconsider the
requested variances and zoning changes requested by Legg
Mason. Respectfully Youssef and Wanda Marzouk
8/14/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: jrwarmington@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 9:44 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
We look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana Cub on Clearwater Beach. The
improvements sound great. They will add a lot to the area.
John and Roma Warmington
8/1412008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Ruth Durovey [rdurovey@zoomintemet.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13,20089:03 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club Improvements
Just wanted you to know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana
Club on Clearwater Beach. The improvements sound great, and will add very nicely to
the area.
Ruth Durovey
8/14/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Charles Korpal [chasharonatplay@webtv.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 8:13 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: cabana club improvements
Just tom let you know, the proposed iprovements to the Cabana Club on Clearwater Beach
sound great. We look forward to them very much as thy wI! add to the Club and the entire area.
Charlie and Sharon Korpal
8/14/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: LBR101@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:13 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club Improvements
We look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana Club on Sand Key, Clearwater.
The improvements will enhance that existing location.
Elaine Crawford and Larry Robillard
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/14/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Robert Borda [rdborda@att.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13,200810:49 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: CABANA CLUB ON SAND KEY
CHUCK EADE,
MY HUSBAND AND I ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS PROJECT. WE WILL SUPPORT YOU
IN ANY WAY POSSIBLE. WE ARE EAGER TO SEE THE PLANS GO FORWARD.
SINCERELY,
DONNA AND ROBERT BORDA
8/1312008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Veronica Downen [sandkeyveronica@yahoo.com)
Sent: Wednesday, August 13,200810:24 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club on Sand Key
Mr. Wells,
Due to the misinformation being dispersed by some of our local residents, I want you to
know that there are many, many residents who support this construction project.
I live at Dan's Island and overlook the area where the new hotel would be built. The plans
speak for themselves as to the wonderful addition this project would bring to Sand Key and to the
residents next door. WE ARE THRILLED TO HAVE SUCH AN UPGRADE.
Thank you for your careful consideration on the positive impact a five star hotel and restaurant would
bring to Sand Key.
Veronica Downen Emmons
1600 Gulf Blvd., #1014
Sand Key
8/1312008
Page 1 of1
Wells, Wayne
From: Cyndi Storm [CStorm@qfbLnet]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 200810:22 AM
To: Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com.
Subject: Cabana Club on Clearwater Beach
Just wanted you to know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana
Club on Clearwater Beach. The improvements sound great, and will add very nicely to
the area.
Thank you
Cynthia S. Storm
Vice President Manufacturing and Operations
cstorm@qfbLnet
317 West Front Street
Monroe, MI 48161
734-240-0812 ext 406
734-240-2594
8/1312008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Momor004@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 200810:16 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club
The Cabana is a nice place, and sounds like it will be even nicer, we like going there, and
enjoying the food, great view and beach.
Seems hard to believe you are having trouble getting permits for such great improvements.
M. Moorman
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/1312008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Downtowndanny1 @aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 13,200810:10 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Re: Cabana
The Cabana is a nice place, and sounds like it will be even nicer, we like dining there, and
enjoying the great view. Hope you can start the changes soon.
D. D'Amour
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/13/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: NISK104@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 10:03 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club
I think the improvements to the Cabana Club sound great. Hope you can start working on the project soon.
N. Swanson
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/13/2008
Salvatore and Estela Valenziano
1581 Gulf Boulevard, # 401
Clearwater, FL 33767
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
AU6 13 2008
August 11,2008
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
crrv OF CLEARWATER
Wayne Wells
Planning Department
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Re: Case # FLD2008-02002
Dear Mr. Wells:
As home owners in the Harbour Condominiums on Sand Key, we are opposed to the
Legg Mason hotel proposal at 1590 Gulf Blvd. This is our neighborhood, not a
tourist area like Clearwater Beach. I am sure you would not want a hotel built in
your neighborhood just as we do not want a hotel in our neighborhood.
It is the responsibility of Clearwater government to represent the best interests of
the majority of property owners in this matter, rather than the special interest of a
developer.
~1/~
Salvatore and Estela Valenziano
~~~u~O-O
ORIGINAl
RECEIVED
AUG 13 2008
Wayne Wells
Planning Dept.
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
.'IANNING DEPARTMENT
CIlY OF CLEARWATER
8/12/08
RE: FLD2008-02002
1590 Gulf Blvd.
Cabana Tower
As Sand Key property owners and residents we adamantly oppose any variances,
conveyances or concessions to the written building codes being given to Legg Mason
in the development of their property on Sand Key. It would appear that the current plan
ignores many restrictions and code requirements (disregard for the CCCL, height
limitations, parking requirements and setbacks). It is your responsibility to recognize that
codes exist for a reason, which is the protection and benefit of all. Our community has
it's own quiet culture and it would seem this development would be more in character
with Clearwater Beach not Sand Key. The project as designed is simply too large for the
parcel of property as governed by codes.
We as citizens and property owners are owed the rights and respect to live in and enjoy
our neighborhood and residence under the conditions in which we became property
owners. We also recognize the rights Legg Mason has as property owners and encourage
them to move forward with their development so long as the plans meet the current codes
and building limitations as written.
Please just do the right thing and insist that any development meet the codes and
requirements as written.
Sincerely,
Linda, Tom, Andy and Sarah Holt
1560 Gulf Blvd. #1707
Clearwater, FL 33767
Giuseppe Schittino
1581 Gulf Boulevard, # 403
Clearwater, FL 33767
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
AUG 13 2008
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
August 11, 2008
Wayne Wells
Planning Department
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Re: Case # FLD2008-02002
Dear Mr. Wells:
As a home owner in the Harbour Condominiums on Sand Key, I am opposed to the
Legg Mason hotel proposal at 1590 Gulf Blvd. This is my neighborhood, not a
tourist area like Clearwater Beach. I am sure you would not want a hotel built in
your neighborhood just as I do not want a hotel in my neighborhood.
It is the responsibility of Clearwater government to represent the best interests of
the majority of property owners in this matter, rather than the special interest of a
developer.
Sincerely,
??ittIDO
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: phyllis neidhardt [paneidhardto34@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 11 :41 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Cabana Club Improvements
Just wanted you to know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the
Cabana Club on Clearwater Beach. The improvements sound great, and will add
very nicely to the area.
Phyllis Neidhardt
8/13/2008
Page 1 of1
Wells, Wayne
From: Nazjac@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 11 :36 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: msmith@belleviewbiltmore.com; GRAlmar@Verizon.net
Subject: Cabana Grill Improvements
Dear Mr. Wells,
I am a resident of Belleair Bluffs and I frequently use the facilities of the present Cabana Grill on Sand Key. I
was somewhat concerned when I heard that the Grill was to be torn down and rebuilt as a hotel and restaurant
because I felt that it was in danger of losing the character and charm it had attained as a quaint, old Clearwater
Beach gathering place. I enjoyed taking my visitors there on special occasions, and to a one, they always sang
the praises of the restaurant as "a great place to go, on the beach".
After reading the letter of August 6th, sent to residents of Sand Key from Martin Smith of the Belleview Biltmore
Resort, I am relieved to know that the plans for the renovation will, in many ways, retain the charm of the "old"
grill and in other ways, add to the attractiveness and allure of the restaurant and boutique hotel planned for the
site.
My family and I are looking forward to the completion of the project and plan to visit the restaurant as soon as it
is open.
Sincerely,
John H. Nazario
100 Bluff View Drive, Unit C 210
Belleair Bluffs, FL 33770-1353
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/13/2008
Legg Mason Case # FLD2008-02002(1590 Gulf Blvd) -
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:35 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Legg Mason Case # FLD2008-02002(1590 Gulf Blvd) -
-----Original Message-----
From: Lillian Johnson [mailto:lillian.johnson@ravensun.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:11 PM
To: Hibbard, Frank; Petersen, Carlen; Doran, John; Gibson, Paul; Cretekos, George; Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Cynthia@ProRemLaw.com
Subject: Legg Mason Case # FLD2008-02002(1590 Gulf Blvd) -
Dear Council Members,
Before you is an opportunity to set a new trend in governing. Turn away from environmentally destructive building
practices of the past, to the future - protecting what few resources we have left - those that have made Clearwater
a truly unique place by the sea.... unlike other "Cement Jungles" most people try to escape from.
More high rise structures that waste precious water and energy is not what we need.
More boats that pollute the air we breath, the sea that sustains us, and maim and kill sea life is not what we need.
It was a staple of elegant affluence at one time, but now is a staple of opulent waste.
As I look at the empty condos and hotel rooms (with constant running air conditioning), I just wonder what kind of
profit Legg Mason thinks they will get. Without ample parking, not much repeat business I'd guess.
Modifying the building restrictions is no answer either. It sets a dangerous precedence for the future. We may not
be as lucky to have a council that actually listens to the people, in the years to come, and this appears to be
opening the door for unbridled development.
I have the greatest respect and admiration for what Mason did with the Biltmore. Saving a National Historic
Treasure is no small task. We, as a community, owe them a debt of gratitude. In so doing, might we suggest to
Legg Mason that they modify their building plans to something more in line with the natural landscape - like a "real
Florida" theme - even junglish in nature. Small, quaint, lots of lush Florida (low maintenance) vegetation
everywhere. Something unique that people will want to visit - and pay more for. Is it better they have 150 half
empty rooms, or 50 always full ones?
Given Mason's noble and creative track record, I'm sure they can come up with something truly different, within
planning guidelines, and that will make them more money then the current proposal.
More and more architectural plans are now taking the environment into consideration. And since this environment
is the primary reason for Clearwater's success, shouldn't we?
Thank you for listening,
It is really appreciated.
Lillian Johnson,
Clearwater Beach resident
8/13/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Nulmage727@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 20081:09 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: (no subject)
Just wanted you to know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the
Cabana Club on Clearwater Beach. The improvements sound great, and will add very
nicely to the area.
Have been going to the Cabana Club for 10 years.
Vicki & Glenn Hanson
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/1312008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: bbandsb306@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:20 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: re: Cabana Club Permits
Just so you know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana Club on
Clearwater Beach. It is owned by our association and the plans we have seen can only improve
the Cabana Club as well as the area.The improvements will also add a couple of great restaurants
which the area needs. Please approve the permits so this project can move forward. Thank you.
Bill and Shirley Barnhart
8/13/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: bbandsb306@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday,,:\ugust 13, 20084:49 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club Improvements
Just wanted you to know, we look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana
Club on Clearwater Beach. The improvements sound great, and will add very nicely to the
area.
Shirley and Bill Barnhart
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/13/2008
Page 1 of1
Wells, Wayne
From: Sandy Auge [sandyauge@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13,20083:48 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club
Just wanted you to know; we look forward to the planned improvements to the Cabana Club on
Clearwater Beach. The improvements sound great, and will add very nicely to the area.
Sandy and Larry Auge
8/13/2008
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:46 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Subject: Legg Mason's Proposed Cabana Club Hotel (re: Case #: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf
Blvd.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Doran, John
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:42 PM
To: 'kaip1621'
Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Manni, Diane
Subject: RE: Subject: Legg Mason's Proposed Cabana Club Hotel (re: Case #: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
Mr. Kaip:
Thank you for your comments, but the Legg Mason matter is a matter before the Community Development Board,
not the City Council. To date, there is nothing to suggest that Legg Mason intends to ask for anything that would
come before the City Council.
I have copied your email toSherryWatkinsinthePlanningDepartment;shewillmakeitavailabletotheCDB.as
is most appropriate.
There will an opportunity for personal public input at the CDB meeting on August 19, at which time you can
address the CDB on this matter, in person, should you choose.
john doran
Clearwater City Council
Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to and from government officials
regarding government business are public records available to the public and to the media upon request. Your e-
mail communications may be subject to public disclosure.
-----Original Message-----
From: kaip1621 [mailto:kaip1621@netzero.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 20083:38 PM
To: Doran, John
Subject:Fw: Subject: Legg Mason's Proposed Cabana Club Hotel (re: Case #: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.)
My Concems are listed below.
Subject: Legg Mason's Proposed Cabana Club Hotel
Legg Mason's application to build the 10-story high hotel at the
Cabana Club Restaurant site. .
The size of the proposed building is too big for the lot because they only
have 88 feet to build on and the code requires a 200 foot wide lot.
8/13/2008
Page 2 of2
. The height of the proposed building is too tall. The code limits them
to 25 feet and building something 100 feet or 10 stories high will hurt
surrounding property values.
. There is not enough parking now. Adding a 38 room hotel but only 8
parking spaces makes the problem worse.
. Taking 25 feet of public beach restored with taxpayers' dollars
should be stopped.
. Operating a ferry boat for guests from over 450 hotel rooms on a
canal ~here all of the properties are residential.
re: Case #: FLD2008-02002 (1590 Gulf Blvd.) to:
Respectfully Submitted, Peter Kaip
1621 Gluf Blvd. Apt 601
Clearwater, Florida 33767
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by A VG.
Version: 7.5.524/ Virus Database: 270.5.12/1595 - Release Date: 8/6/2008 8:23 AM
Click here to find Medical Transcription Training programs.
8/13/2008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 20083:46 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Legg Mason's application to build a 10-story high hotel at the Cabana Club Restaurant site
-----Orig i na I Message-----
From: grczeis@aol.com [mailto:grczeis@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13,20083:14 PM
To: Hibbard, Frank; Gibson, Paul; Doran, John; Cretekos, George; Watkins, Sherry; Petersen, Carlen
Subject: Legg Mason's application to build a 10-story high hotel at the Cabana Club Restaurant site
Dear Clearwater Mayor, City Council and Clearwater Community Development Board,
We are writing to you because we are Clearwater Sand Key property owners and want to express our
concerns about the Legg MasonlBelleview Biltmore Hotel plans for the Cabana Club Restaurant
property .
Our first concern is about the parking situation. There currently is not enough parking for the Cabana
Club residents. During the months when all of the owners are in residence we have a difficult
time finding a parking place for own use, or our guests. The addition of the proposed hotel with only 8
new parking spaces will compound the problem, and even make it worse.
Our second concern is about the use ofthe beach for cabanas. What about the sea turtle habitat? Did all
ofthe taxpayers pay to have this beach restored for Legg Mason and the Belleview Biltmore? They may
say that the beach is only being used, but in all practicality it is being taken away. The cabanas will at
the very least, damage the turtle habitat, and will be for the use of the hotel guests.
And lastly, the proposed building is too big for the lot.
Thank you for your consideration of our concerns.
Sincerely,
George and Madonna Czeiszperger
Owners1582 Cabana Club, Unit #1408
It's time to go back to school! Get the latest trends and gadgets that make the grade on AOL Shopping.
8/1312008
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Sandy [dbarnes6@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:45 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Cabana Club on Sand Key
Importance: High
Mr. Wells,
My husband and I have been Sand Key residents since 1997 - full time residents I might add
and we would like to voice our opinion on the Cabana Club redevelopment project.
We are not alone in saying that this redevelopment project is a good thing for Sand Key. The
project is only going to beautify that section of Sand Key. We were very happy when the
current Cabana Club opened to have a place very close to go to and have dinner, listen to
music in a beautiful atmosphere and meet our friends and neighbors. We have been going to
the Cabana Club since it has opened at we would miss is terribly if it were gone. We live 6
buildings down from Cabana however even if we lived next door we would feel the same way.
Everyone is crying about taxes well I cannot see the redevelopment of the Cabana Club
helping the tax base on Sand Key. The plans look beautiful and should not be stopped.
We receive mail from one organization asking for money for attorney fees to fight this
redevelopment and the mail goes directly in the garbage and I will tell you if we receive one
more letter they will definitely receive a response from us and it will not be nice!
In addition we have seen an aerial view of Sand Key in 1965 and guess who was the first
here? Cabana Clubl I think you should think very hard about your decision regarding this
redevelopment and allow this to proceed!
Sandra & Donald Barnes
1460 Gulf Blvd
Unit 202
Clearwater, FL 33767
(727) 596-9786
8/13/2008
Page 1 of1
Wells, Wayne
From: HawnWahine@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:08 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Legg Mason's application for variances
Dear Mr. Wells:
I will be unable to attend the meeting on August 19th as I will be at work. However, I do want you to know that I
am against Legg Mason's application for variances.
As an owner in the Cabana Club, I bought here because it was a residential community, quiet and relatively
private. I was not informed, at any time, of the plans with the current Cabana Club restaurant. Had I known
what was to come, I would never have moved here.
I am not against developing the current site to code standards; I am against all of the variances that Legg
Mason is seeking. What is the point of having a building code if it is not followed? I can already anticipate the
crowds that will be coming, the traffic and parking problems as well as the litter on the beach. As it is, the
beach is crowded on holidays, the parking is bad and there is a lot of trash left on the beach. J will attach
pictures showing you the current situation, never mind a 10-story hotel as well.
If they are allowed to take part of the public beach, that would set a precedent that would be hard to stop. In
building a sea wall, the adjacent buildings would be affected during any surge of water. In protecting the hotel,
the water would all go to the sides of the sea wall, eroding the beach in front of the Cabana Club and Dan's
Island.
As I mentioned before, parking is already a problem. By reducing the number of parking spaces to support the
proposed complex, there will be chaos. The driveway and street traffic will also be affected.
! am also against eliminating or reducing the set backs. \^Jhy \AJou!d ! want a hotel to be even closer to my
condo when I don't even want one?
Please consider the current owners' dilemma and support us by not approving the variances that Legg Mason
is asking for.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Ellen F. Walton
1586 Gulf Blvd., #2403
Clearwater, FL 33767
(949) 378-4509
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
8/1312008
."jj1Li;.
~----...........
Ub?uC 9/ AC'e8
d ~
Lt'vnuHuC//uz:/ /t..e-. L /c' ~
I;/' . 0 ,?<C ~-:17ze/.h~ #<7-,?0!2 t::
L-b2d:.ka:.7 ~c:.. J/!....,/ k/ /. . . ~ z. .
Q-4:;;t- ;/ Vtzd "Z r:
iZ:,-- /c' {/ ." l!: m il 0
.c.... -1-{. _' ~. . 7" <-;::::'//a~ . r"l (i) ~ 0 a2
._' ?C-0""1 ~ m ~
,( , '" iili
vitjit/ .~_U'. ~~J'/.' . .' . i~. 0 ~
. . , ~
I . /../ ;;J
(-;)/2+L,i '. ~~ -A# a./ u-d'L ~
'--jL~ .?'-Lk' ~_/./ .'../. (j . _:-. /."./.. ~., '--ff/ ~p /
~ , . .' ~ ,,:~.f'<L~~LL/. /l q r-
--LA..... .~/n;J~ ~f tZc~c'vZ;-'C4'ZCL .~.,.. .:zA-;~
/.d~. ~/~;Y / 1/-
cJ'-cu!/. .:: 4~ ~7' -/<'V <A1~/:d:
L//</ 0/ .. /
/'t!/"/'C-c /,"'7 . P:. >- / .' "
. .' ,Y /J. "-.~~d;? ~/..(;.L....' fJl ~." it2.>.c~/
uc..'/fd.-eL /l~ .../.<::j'C'':'-~~CL. -~~ sA~?cdI
.' . ._' ./<:;7
UC ,-/2Z ,,<22 (!/L,(
~, Ajr1)f~~d.- ;/dtj J~'-t'f(:
, .' / . ... / . //. _./~ ....-r".J/
/<2-L'.'e.4i:C~;'-:~ {~'(.c:Ld@''t:~ J.?<z:-'~~/. 0./~/t>~. .??~
. (j /,~' 1'" / -. ./. .Li' ~'. .'
---4..<:--r'1"""" J / /2#C~' ...<<e"..<Z-- /. ~7~ d~'.t-/L~i-C.-L/'
h'~'//~'~ ~~.
,--;;/;, dj' . '. ~I
;.a2~l.t:t.j /\~t e c-?;Yi4'n.~/{:/,rV'~j ,
Y~'.'~"~;tU;Z.'.. ' r-<</'.c~'... . UJl.L2/~c//.C.. /. _h'.~:.b .7'&.... -" .
/ I, fA U ,,,' j'/ j "
7/.2/ //~c<', :I~ fl~/ ~<. ~
c/(~--c--V Jpc/ ~~ .~~~.
,/'/
,/'fI1CLif ddLld~~ 4 -L4;1
';JHc.zed ",,!:v t'Fh'U;n<5<A'~- ..
/_~-;?t t.eAs..e-4.f I
;J ~r..,'-"
Y.d[0~lh 7t~4:#'(:
. /
Art' 4- 07
, If- 1) 0 () v \f:- 0\ J d..
CI~w'l-\-tJ R- 337~1
j
~.....
Lawrence E. Hite
2700 6ulf Boulevard, # 1 E
8elleair Beach, Fl 33786-3531
Voice (727) 596-0058
E-mail: larrvhite@Verizon.net
':J:1
~i l>
C~ c:
~~ ~ ~~
,.., m'~
j i ~~
ffI~
-t
August 11,2008
Mr. Wayne Wells
Planning Coordinator
City Hall, 3rd Floor
112 South Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: Cabana Grill on Sand Key
Dear Mr. Wells:
My residence is but a short walk from Cabana Grill where friends and
family gather for dinner. The food is excellent and the view of a sunset
over the gulf from the dining room adds to the atmosphere.
T find it disconcerting that the proposed replacement of the eXIstmg
building that meets the requirements of the city code is facing opposition.
Might those in opposition consider the replacement structure will enhance
the area. The new structure should increase tax income to include real
property, personal property and tourism. The merchants in the area should
benefit with additional sales.
I do not envision any additional traffic on Gulf Boulevard caused by a hotel
located at Cabana Grill.
We are asked from time to time if there is a hotel near by. To be fair the
Belleair Resort Motel is to our south and Marriott and Sheraton hotels at
the upper end of Sand Key. These do not satisfy the need for
accommodations in between.
Please allow the developers to proceed with improvements to Sand Key.
Very truly yours,
cI} ~ f1JJ-
Lawrence E. Hite
,'~:
ORiGINAl
RECEIVED
4UG 14 2008
~L 4 ',', , '. Pi.ANNING ~EN
I, r€~,.~. CULe A.l?-QJ.&rtA7/ L<j~ff(J!Jf~AT~
~.rh~ ~ ~ ry:7j""Y)->J?L4en.
/1VG. JJ- a~?"~.J JJ-J!.,(...fL"i/
.. )
/
~r~
;JJ~?~~.
;c..~/o {~..
{, ~~" ~~-cb~-L:7J. .. '
dl_ ~ eP-n ~.a.e.J, a..-J,,~...e-, ~~L./ ..-rY4~~-?"tr- ~~'-LJUZ/
~ /J. 1/ ,..-. j}~ .1/'
,;/, ~~ ..~-~ (9-rJ ~-h, ~~ .k~-~
4.1:;..~ ../ ~~t L~~..L <1er~ ~r7l -<l~J; ~Q f?- ~.<:~----t ~
t/~ ifrJl<>..r- r' ~~ r~ k:''''r~ ~(/ ~"-~Y>..
.s. ~ct~/-~~~,.dc-e 4/~~..T<.~
~ ; (J/LL......(J--{J. -O.....{..{.J _uvi ...('':'../LR.(jL4...J( -'" -t"", "L /U-a---J' uC.. ~.&.....j/rY)
'7. /~. . . ..,;' U~~ cf '4fluuL; r .4 ~~-"-) . ~-~....., tU-o-L-f-'
-rL, .u" r-f~ fJ - .J . /l /l , () .JL" {j
'"' ~-{' ~~.z, .~ . <AL-<U ~<=~, <:-~ c~"-r' < ...
v /no L-C_( I);:t. A fOJ i-L<i;7. J/ (!n... 1,>-'0 .r t.n. \.:: ~....( j,,_ 1"lt.--k.""1/...t:- {3 ~.;~ -Uf'-<.~X.i.c/ it..(J>~..o1...C~JL;
:l' . -~_.V-v' --"-'-" (/-- 'U&'V U'-'V I..~ . ~ _.i_ -. - '-,........ - V'
<2~~";1 ~ ~'~'..I t l~ r"c..:/'v~ (~<-J,L#./
~...u'B.fy ;f CR/)__~v~l.- .aLe./ &!/}<.-'iJ.~il-<-I(J. .~~&<.-Iu-/v:1" /Le/~(;:le/::;Lv
1- I ,n'" ~f d.R-,r"l ~ ~VZ<:.JU -UL-O ;c.4U .f,.......'.LLt.7
'1'. kGcA..e~.L k.J.j ~,;o..~. .. . .
10, ~L.k~.Q4_l?P' ~~, ~~_d..c-r'~-9-r'\ ~ I~.
II, )l....h'..J-.AAJ. K~ ~. .u<.:-;,,'~I CtA--fJ.~./6l41 ~L~. ~~-- "4--;:. (..~..-~..JlA-' &-^....Q.
1 , ~ . LJ. ' I!- ;L_ , t. J JJ !J
,/}-CJL/ ~ /1.-0 ~~u ~ 4~'<-.e..R.j f~ _L-,.~ f!::...~CY',x~;z. ~.~~.~..e-c ~-'" :..... "',
f/ . /) . ~ -,c.. . c:? . 1....- _<""Yu._(.;-~.t.!l.J-..uz.:vk...'.../
rC!L--7-<.r;~ 6---,,"I.d<"'''I~LIeJ!./r';J; a.'U?~'-" . ~ -~_.~. .'
:~ (~)~'-o./,,'{'~-'L.- c1!..(-0-t~/LQ~r'~'-- ,~. /rtd-/{.. &.<:.-c..e...~~6&_r
'2. ;..1A..L~' "-'-~~/ Zuvrv~0, J""';/ ~ ~rn.{/<-e;
f1~~.w~.z..v llui-1A~r..<',ce_:t<) I A'~9 CJ ,Ltf" I,~~'.. l/
'. i/
J::;. ~.-" L ~~J .~1J1-{~-fl~..u ;i::It.AYuc.. .AA.'~cJi:..e; .)....--<... (.f2-CUlrV~~r/ -t;.
()- ~V ,
J:il.i!. ..fI1!/(1.c-{~.-<'Y.d.,.fL9-; /v>--!'!I.L. .Z.JjJ-o-tJ..j. .-"\., 6'"1..i'l~"> .
I ~
~
, if. JhC.(YLiLCL<L.v..~C /YL-~l-YV~/'.u t:)tfL<- 7/-l;<"./ ~...k..v'-<-l.4-(/;'Z.9'- h4-< "y= /j.e",/a>t.
() \ {J ". (j_ iJ,.
JJ>~~ ~~~ o--vt.L .vv~ ~,,~ b r<-"~ ~
.... HcZ.,;741ff i~A~~~~rl<" OJ>..9t.:L.LJ t:V.'( <--e_ ~A--l.,-C...e4-<-f
I ( ^,;., "",..A.V........." 2 :J, . , ,.... ,'A _,.J..h.~ ~I _'.A' {.'" J<' .} ,~~.
~ . ~~~~.~ r~"' ~. '"V' ~~ '-:-/.-~- ..,W cf .~. , <.^/., ~-?~/ / Ul;t /\-Q4< -c.U/~i
.Jl!~ L"-dLeA- / .jL~1-- ...Lv-e.j2j(~ ~-U(-' /~~ '!~~~r ...f...A,'~~..
c&:.v~ .~.Jn~ ~~..-\...-<.Y~, . ~A--C- ~..cL
. . +. ,. .' rid _ 7{-' r- ...{. " L
,J....u--~J ....(.,!JtJ:{~A/ _,(.j.....)...bi.--Z(-iL~_. &-7"1 .z--^e..(.,A.~ /JC'I--<. CLLfl--&;ri ~~-T') ~ .e
'1.J...e~if.-, ~77C-(~.--rt/. /?'U:~/' ~li.lvA-e~J.-1,.u~~;:t~(,~~ ~". rr1rG-<!t...s::Z -i(j
19"'7 ~tL-y1-<5-L/' I~ ~.d-A'"-?t-~ .
/ f.,... (;",""V~_~/--- /lP-~ .4.~e... )!,,~, ,1~._.vrtArt..X.,2, ,,-~:2.LA._~
;t;, ?~"...t ...iA.G-k. '{j ./b~~, ",..> .Lt2.i3l..u""y x-:IL.. uf...:v.~~.
/ '7. ;J~.jA..-(.,'-1.AL.0 ..h-R-o-ch.. z:L..-, /l"J---L€..-<..u-' 8 4J,.-"J-'l-1-t!J..X ~RTYLcf2.&-LA
fl ~l ~..z.<j!',uL' ~.\.... (P.16(_~~~ .L:l:rY~,' AX-<1.-<.k4L'4.-' ~-j
,0.. " U .
c-.f~o./r'1.-ZR,_'p -.r)-a~\.... 4'----<-.J:.?,A,X,......V..
If. t'" .J-- /' ~1
U~~",-<>-c~ ~--R_) ~-v /~-.J,- CA-i ,.A..J1 ~ A ~/ (JLd..-,:lAE~:'n ,ld /J.o-.-c:i," l:.e.,<..r
n ' ~~ r
1'(" 1<')6--;.,/. j. /" " ~~'J A_~" -I, ,'> ,~J1 ..". II , ' ~ :: ;'7, ,_iJ "" ., ':". ., - {
............. \)'-/~ ll''7 -' !r-"-'~"'v --u....:._~......... .~'"C..~j ,~-..e:/...~~,,--<:-,,~L.-'
/ (j""
.z.lJ&L~Cl,( fe'l/ ~ /L12-4-c,;i......L:t;.~ - ~.~ c~{-:Ol..o..lM'"7t .
~ L ,b-vvdt j(.t..<-~ ~~/, o~-!'~J-~j-Yv,;;tJ4 ~ .~..{):; J j yr., 9-- t<.....'.'/:tJ..-U> .;., ~ -,I
. . . 7? 1. t" '-', ~ f7 ~-~,. ~ t7' ,:'r ........,.. VI-,
~liL{!j,-u C9-~, A, Jw:> "",,--.~~.y'J Zt:-. Ol.U.C0. . I ~~' /fCLt...t- /;~-~-Y~1
(E.. O...c_.(....l-..~J2..- .11-O~~iJ-.,; I..:f..-.VV -~-u./l~ ..L-vLr .t;.;L\L /YlA",,-C.lfl.-LUl-I>.d t.Tf-
A.. _ .,.,........ . ~t:., ~ --7" tf- II, /J -.;~'~'
/~I''1-U. ,...._......\...0........... 'J~J?--;r~ "..~.AJ~1..-t~ M ~.~~j ()L. ;.)
iZr......."x-t-_ Q~_ ~l-'l._~ ;t:.fr..A../:i/ ...Ln.1...f1.--I--,L. CV'u2a.;
.:u. ./) ""17' ?n<.L4-C7-" .UJ-o.-,z..1.v ;&., r-t- 7 CL ~rJ4...:L.x.-'<"n
~~I ~vn....K..e.,'J..f'O-<.~V Jl.n rJ A-o _<t.->.~<; ~(/ JA}'Ch-V(
t,.j ~ ,7-
u ~-LJJ ;c."jj ....J~'-L"-<j-l ~'-d,
,{. 3.. Jl -<-~,-.j 'iIr'--d~r'V"'r;~{;"rn --7Li..I--Yr~L;:--r-j ~ ,~<'-L.i:..'c/ a-vi... .?::/c.<....
f) /; (I. /- /---
~/A . - .,Ld-<:"--e-~~., a..e.€.___ (Le.r-r~"-_' &rl ;:t::~ ."L-e-f'i.<t-J .A.''-K__
q'y-r..?JY'i"""(Xj{t, ;t" .YJ---<".J..^-.e/l)
u
I, " f' ')
r '.. ' ,J
.a.::i---_'<..., )!,.t...j),"~h 0~A...3,{tJ '>
" ~,,! ~ .1- ". J c--- ~.P ./
(:1..-1,1...... GL.~if.--<./6.-'(.;-yl.(..c.C ...'y\. ~ l} - ~-',...
~~'Z
~''',~L H'
~ i ~
~ 1-/ J., - ./ / /...---- . -II" ./J -J. .+ 'i<' /2 --r""
-, . / f~/ '-" , LiLt/" /,-,",-<LL--!'/,~e-?-'t_~/ _LU()~I'L-~ ~/_-rl -./(:..JL~-tf .0/1....R..~(j.'- ifi--'z...f..2--<:.._L~)
~.:,~_.-I- urvt..c:l-..J4d:-~- /) ~..... O---L;2.CL-..
!) J/ O' 0 .
~ -' ~ (!~'d.~;'Aj .--.y ~ 'Ii._"'-e~ .-,-,-~-'-'-k..r:.~~
CJ.- ~.. '~,' J,L-i-- d)-,o--. ii~L..~;, ,.,uj-tZ~t<- ~'f,!/7 1/>~~'-J,,' 'j
/) /) (), . ~ ;/t/
~L"<"'~ ,v o-c~~; ;tA.-?~ j ~.uo~. &-f-c..~(,~""'~.Jy).;r ..b.-J.(_::"--l'~{/P
.J (7,..!
L .. ~ i/
...-(...<-. ~L.i(J:. .....- ~<.;---o.<-<..JJ.-pC -Y--V~/j ._LV.tJ..,rL/ - ~~-/... r
/) L,,~r 11
I t H"~'E -- /v-~ZU
'-t-,' ,j) _ '.'), I),
~")~.
,
~--OA.fY'~I../I--A..
---u
;7'.7 ,- I
VI -.9..1'J '"7r1 i:Z.4-<)-rZ/V ,/).SJrLS&.~L
A '
~t<.1j\ll..iA:.._:/
{J
/J/"7 ~ r
i _ '/ ./ ,,~_,~_. /l J JJ
y )' /1/ U t.LIl:.--t:/~-~--._-...,
{/,..-,.:;,....-
I~-&-b ~-f tY..~,
df'
~;:z. 3 C,; 3
''',IV