Clearwater Comprehensive Plan - Issues of Concern Regarding the Legg Mason Proposal
,
(bfO mf~ /lAASh'LiJfJ:l00T2JdcL ~ 1J'ltJLr-. '7/1&/(J5
[fp) l)
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan
Issues of Concern Regarding the Legg Mason Proposal
FLD2008-02002 - 1590 Gulf Blvd.
J CONSERVATION ELEMENT
25.6 Objective - jfhe City shall continue to protect beaches, sand dunes, and dune
vegetation for their natural function and for their recreational oQen sQac~
t --
uses!
---
Policies
25.6.1 Motor vehicles shall be prohibited from parking on all City beaches.
25.6.2 Unauthorized motor vehicles shall be prohibited from operating on the City's
beaches and dunes.
25.6.3 Development and/or construction of any structures shall not be built seaward
bf the Coastal Construction Control line, unless approved by the Florida'
bepartment of Environmental Protection and the City of Clearwater}
I .
'25.6.4 Beach and beach dunes shall not be disturbed or destroyed by an'l form ot
bonstruction or development with the exception of wooden boardwallf
hructures which Qrovide access to and from beach areasJ
25.6.5 All beaches, dunes, and associated vegetation shall be protected by local
ordinance.
Je5.6.6 Shoreline development shall be prohibited from obstructing views of the
'Gulf of Mexico, Clearwater Harbor and Old TamQa Ba'[ where public access ir
~esignated.! -
COMMENT: It is critical to note that a formal City public sidewalk access lies
abutting along this entire project site on the South.
vi j Conservation Needs Summary
. irhe Qrotection, maintenance, and continued management of Clearwater's shorelines,
especially its barrier island beach shorelines, is critical. These areas provide an important social
and economic function as these natural resources for Clearwater's tourism industry. Clearwater
Beach~ Sand Key', and the geographic proximity to Caladesi Island State Park are some of the
JiiOSt'imQortant and unigue resources the City. Qossesses~
.
'Xl Scenic vistas shall remain designated as "scenic non-commercial corrido,;;." ~~
are specifically: Memorial Causewa~; Edgewater Drive; Courtney CamQbell
I ~ '----"
parkwa'i; Gulf ~oulevardJ Bayshore Boulevard; and Belleair Road between U.s.
Highway 19 and Belcher Road.
COMMENT: I believe this ties into again the desire to further intensify - by many fold - a
Commercial operation on what is designated a non-commercial corridor. Some scenic non-
commercial corridors on the main land in the County and City have not remained in this
directed character. However, this area of Gulf Blvd. is solely residential.
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES; FUTURE LAND USE
1.1.1 ~ny permanent and temporary alteration of DeQartment of Environmental
~ction (D.E.p.Uurisdictiona~non-jurisdictional wetlands, peach duner
sensitive soils, or other natural systems ~all be prohibited unless such alter~
is fully consistent with all local, state, and federal regulations, mitigation and
h,anagement Qlans, and QermittingJ~rocedures that may' be ap-Qlicable', including
the wetland vegetative buffer requirement of the City's Community
Development Code.
COMMENT: I find it personally objectionable that it appears that the applicant may be seeking
to not include improvements past approximately 49' from the CCCL Line in all plans submitted
to the City. It appears to me that the City has a right to review, comment and make a
recommendation of those plans. Further, it is believed that the requested 0' set back appears
to not be in line with this element.
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
~ 3.2.3 tommercialland uses shall be located at the intersection of arterial or COI~
streets and should be sited in such a way' as to minimize the intrusion of off-site
!!nQacts into residential neighborhoodsJ New plats and site plans shall
discourage the creation of "strip commercial" zones by insuring that adequate
lot depths are maintained and by zoning for commercial development at major
intersections.
COMMENT: The project is not located as indicated above. It is not located at any intersection.
The obvious purpose of this element, in my mind, is that more impacting uses are located at
points that can support the use and not be harmed by their activities. Further, the concern of
commercial impacts is a serious liveable issue to this residential neighborhood, as supported by
the recent City Commission vote not allowing higher hotel density specifically on Commercially
.
zoned parcels. These concerns are further raised by the applicant seeking significantly more
impacts to the site, including an approximate 137 seat restaurant, 38 room hotel, bus and boat
shuttles, the approximate 260% increase in height (and use...) and strong attractions for the
general public above and beyond hotel guests. What is planned for the site far exceeds any
ability whatsoever, in my opinion, to minimize any intrusions.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
23.1.2 pevelopment applications shall be reviewed to ensure that proposed,nevJ.
~evelopment or redevelopment will not encroach on or remove wetlands Q.!i .
I . .-
beaches. New development and redevelopment shall be gUided away from
bnvironmentally- sensitive areas and into those most able to withstand imp-~cts'
COMMENT: I have been informed by Nicole Elko, in the Pine lias County's Coastal Management
Department, that the CCCL line is located 20' Gulfward of the Ultimar project (to the North of
the project site and Cabana Condo's) and 10' Gulfward of the Dan's Island project (to the South
of the project site). She communicated that before the last beach renourishment, waves were
hitting against the Dan's island CCCL line. It appears that the proposal by Legg Mason would
obviously have problems with that circumstance. The proposed zero foot setback, and the
approximate 49' Gulfward proposal, and as I understand, a then proposed elevated structure,
would literally be, in my opinion, so out of character, so far beyond what is present on Sand Key
and that it could literally be termed a monstrosity.
J
23.2.2 The sp-ecific and cumulative imp-acts of develo~ment and redevelopment u~ori
wetlands, water quality, water quantity, wildlife habitat, and beach and dun~
systems shall be limited by: strict maintenance of existing setbac~
~equirementsl adherence to storm water detention requirements, retaining all
~ublicl'l owned natural habitats in their undevelop-ed state and transfer of -
development rights.