FLD2008-08028, 1640 ARCTURAS AVE N - September 16, 2008
FLD2008-08028
1640 ARCTURAS AVE N
SHERWOOD YARD
PLANNER OF RECORD: S K
ATLAS # 271A
ZONING: I
LAND USE: INS
RECEIVED: 08/27/2008
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Numbers:
Agenda Item:
Owner:
Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
September 16, 2008
FLD2008-08028
E.3.
City of Clearwater
City of Clearwater, Engineering Department
Phuong V 0
1640 North Arcturas Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
CURRENT ZONING:
CURRENT FUTURE
LAND USE CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE:
EXISTING
SURROUNDING
ZONING AND USES:
Flexible Development approval for a public facility use within the
Institutional (1) District with a lot area of 300,564 square feet, a lot width
of 1,075 feet, a maximum building height of 50 feet, front (east) setbacks
of 16 feet (to building) and 20 feet (to pavement), side (north) setback of
1,496 feet (to building), side (south) setbacks of 2,553 feet (to building)
and 2,411 feet (to pavement), and rear (west) setbacks of 2,260 feet (to
building) and 2,060 feet (to pavement), with 37 off-street parking spaces
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community
Development Code Section 2-1204.A; as well as a waiver to the interior
landscaping requirements, and a partial waiver to the perimeter
landscaping requirements where the existing landscape materials would
be determined to be an acceptable perimeter buffer, as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development
Code Section 3-1202.0.
Institutional (I) District
TransportationlUtilities (T/U)
Current Use: Public Facility
Proposed Use: Public Facility
North: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District
Industrial
South: Institutional (I) District
Airport
East: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District
Industrial
West: Open Space/Recreation (OSR) District
Airport
Community Development Board - September 16, 2008
FLD2008-08028 - Page 1 of?
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 6.90 acres is a triangular shaped parcel with approximately 1,075 feet of frontage on the west side of
North Arcturas Avenue. Both Carroll Street and Sherwood Street intersect the parcel on North Arcturas
Avenue. The property is currently developed with a public facility (storage and transfer station). Located
on the site are various pieces of heavy equipment, piles of gravel, shell, asphalt and sand. A dense
landscape buffer of oleander and wax myrtle exists on the Arcturas Avenue frontage. The Clearwater
Airpark is both to the west and south of the subject property. To the east there is a variety of industrial
uses. Just to the north is the City Public Works facility. The 6.90 acres is part of a 62.74-acre site.
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to redevelop the site with Department of Environmental Protection code compliant refuse
bins and site upgrades. The proposal includes three phases. The first phase includes a 35-foot wide
asphalt drive west of the proposed storage and transfer bins. The four bins proposed in phase one include
a sanitary grit bin, a wash down bin, a street sweep and street inlet debris bin and a storm-water grit bin.
Phase two includes seven bins and a concrete silo. Phase two bins will be utilized as a lime-rock bin, a
broken asphalt bin, a broken concrete bin, a shell bin, a concrete sand bin, a concrete aggregate bin and a
concrete pea gravel bin. The final phase includes a scale house, restroom facility and a 12,750 square
foot, open sided, covered structure for small equipment storage. A total of 37 oversized parking spaces
will be constructed for City work vehicles only. While the public facility use is not permitted in the
Industrial (I) category, it is permitted in the underlying future land use plan category of
Transportation/Utilities (TIU); thus the processing of this application as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project.
Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDe) Section 2-1201.1, the
maximum F.A.R. for properties with a future land use designation of Transportation/Utility (TIU) is 0.70.
The site proposes a 12,750 square foot covered structure for small equipment and bins totaling 23,750
square feet, resulting in a floor area ratio of 0.012. Based upon the above, the development proposal is
consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan with regard to the maximum allowable F.A.R.
Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1201.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is
0.90. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.58, which is consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1204, there is no applicable minimum lot
area or lot width for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment projects. Further, the public facility use does
not have specifically authorized development standards within the Industrial (I) district. However, within
the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) district, CDC Section 2-1303, there are development
standards for the public facility use. Those standards set forth a minimum lot area of 10,000 square foot
and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The subject property is 300,564 square feet in area and has a width
of 1,075 feet both of which are far in excess ofthe typical requirements for the use.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1204, there are no applicable front, rear and side
setbacks for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment projects. The proposal includes setbacks to buildings
to include a front (east) setback of 16 feet (to covered bins), a side (north) setback of 1,496 feet (to
building), a side (south) setback of 2,553 feet (to building) and a rear (west) setback of 2,260 feet (to
building). The front setback of 16 feet (to covered bins) currently exists on the site and is consistent with
code provisions.
Additionally, setbacks to pavement include a front (east) setback of20 feet (to pavement), a side (south)
setback 2,411 feet (to pavement) and a rear (west) setback of 2,060 feet (to pavement). The front (east)
Community Development Board - September 16, 2008
FLD2008-08028 - Page 2 of 7
setback of 20 feet (to pavement) also currently exists and is consistent with code provisions. Finally, the
current site with the above setbacks has a heavily landscaped buffer on Arcturas Avenue. Both side and
rear setbacks are clearly not an issue.
The proposed parking for City work vehicles will be located north of the proposed covered structure.
These spaces will be oversized measuring 10 feet by 20 feet. The spaces near the east property line will
be adequately buffered with existing dense vegetation.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1204, there is no applicable maximum building
height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment projects. The proposed bins will be eight feet to the
midpoint of the roof covering and 30 feet to the top of the proposed roof on the open sided building thus
consistent with this code provision. It is noted that while this request was advertised with a height of 50
feet, it is not anticipated that any of the proposed buildings will exceed 30 feet. The advertisement of 50
feet was due to the fact that the proposed small equipment storage building has not been designed as yet
and the maximum height typically allowed for the public facility use is 50 feet. In this way the building
will be able to be designed to meet its needs and further review will not be necessary.
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at driveway
intersections with Arcturas Avenue, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct
views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. The proposed site and landscape design meet this requirement.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all
utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding
is not practicable. The site plan for this proposal indicates that all on-site electric and communication
lines for this project will be placed underground in conformance with this Code requirement.
Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a IS-foot wide landscape buffer
along North Arcturas Avenue. The current heavily landscaped buffer on North Arcturas Avenue meets
this requirement. The applicant is requesting both a waiver to the interior landscaping requirements, and
a waiver to the side and rear perimeter landscaping requirements. Staff supports this request, as it would
be fruitless to require buffers and interior landscaping in the center of a heavily used storage and transfer
yard.
Solid Waste: All solid waste for this site is taken off-site to City Public Works facilities. This has been
found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Signage: No specific signage is proposed at this time.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the
subject property.
Community Development Board - September 16, 2008
FLD2008-08028 - Page 3 on
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency
of the public facility use development proposal with the standards as per CDC Sections 2-1201.1 and 2-
1204:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Floor Area Ratio 0.70 0.012 X
(FAR.)
I.S.R. 0.90 0.58 X
Minimum N/A 300,564 square feet X
Lot Area
Minimum N/A 1,075 feet X
Lot Width
Minimum Front (east): N/A 16 feet (to building) X
Setbacks 20 feet (to pavement)
Side (north): N/A 1,496 feet (to building) X
Side (south): N/A 2,553 feet (to building) X
2,411 feet (to pavement)
Rear: (west): N/A 2,260 feet (to building) X
2,060 feet (to pavement)
Maximum N/A 30 feet X
Buildin!! Hei!!ht
Minimum Off- As determined by the community 37 oversized spaces X
Street Parking development coordinator based on ITE (1/1 ,000 square feet of
standards gross floor area)
Community Development Board - September 16, 2008
FLD2008-08028 - Page 4 of7
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-l204.A (Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
I. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the genera] purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantia] detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of
1 .. _ . ~ "- _ _.r'_._ n" ", __
a WUrKIng wau:rllUIIL u~t:.
X
6. F]exibi]ity with regard to use, Jot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the norma] and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantia] number of the following design
elements:
o Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
o Variety in materials, colors and textures;
o Distinctive fenestration patterns;
o Bui]ding stepbacks; and
o Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Community Development Board - September 16,2008
FLD2008-08028 - Page 5 of7
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity.
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
6.
X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meeting of August 2, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the
Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of
law:
Findings of Fact:
1. The 6.90 acres is located on the west side of North Arcturas Avenue, both Carroll Street and Sherwood
Street intersect the parcel on North Arcturas Avenue;
2. The property is currently developed with a public facility (storage and transfer station);
3. The proposal is to redevelop the site with Department of Environmental Protection code compliant
refuse bins and site upgrades;
4. A total of37 oversized parking spaces will be constructed;
5. The proposal includes a lot area of 300,564 square feet, a lot width of 1,075 feet, a maximum
building height of 50 feet, front (east) setbacks of 16 feet (to building) and 20 feet (to pavement),
side (north) setback of 1,496 feet (to building), side (south) setbacks of 2,553 feet (to building) and
2,411 feet (to pavement), and rear (west) setbacks of 2,260 feet (to building) and 2,060 feet (to
pavement) as well as a waiver to the interior landscaping requirements, and a partial waiver to the
perimeter landscaping requirements where the existing landscape materials would be determined to
be an acceptable perimeter buffer;
6. The front (east) setbacks from Arcturas Avenue of 16 feet (to building) and 20 feet (to pavement)
reflect existing conditions;
7. The proposed transfer bins will be eight feet in height and the proposed open sided structure will be
30 feet in height to the top of the roof; and
8. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Maximum Development Potential Standards as
per CDC Section 2-1201.1;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC
Section 2-1204;
Community Development Board - September 16, 2008
FLD2008-08028 - Page 6 of7
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-
l204.A; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as
per CDC Section 3-913.
Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
application for a public facility use within the Institutional (1) District with a lot area of 300,564 square
feet, a lot width of 1,075 feet, a maximum building height of 50 feet, front (east) setbacks of 16 feet (to
building) and 20 feet (to pavement), side (north) setback of 1,496 feet (to building), side (south) setbacks
of 2,553 feet (to building) and 2,411 feet (to pavement), and rear (west) setbacks of 2,260 feet (to
building) and 2,060 feet (to pavement), with 37 off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2-1204.A; as well as a waiver to
the interior landscaping requirements, and a partial waiver to the perimeter landscaping requirements
where the existing landscape materials would be determined to be an acceptable perimeter buffer, as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-
1202.G. with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design of the proposed transfer/storage bins and covered building be consistent with
the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That the existing landscape buffer on Arcturas Avenue be maintained in perpetuity; and
3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans are revised to indicate underground
utilities and communication lines for the proposal will be relocated underground.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
A. Scott Kurleman, Planner ill
.ft dtJiI~-
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX (FLD)\Pending cases I Up for the next CDBlArcturas 1640 - Sherwood Yard (I) 9-16-2008 CDB -
SKlArcturas 1640 Staff Report. doc
Community Development Board - September 16, 2008
FLD2008-08028 - Page 7 of 7
Resume
A. Scott Kurleman
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4567 x2504
scott.kurlemanla),mvclearwater .com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
. Planner III
City of Clearwater
June 2005 to present
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual,
variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to
determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings.
Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City
officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and
presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings.
. Land Resource Specialist
City of Clearwater
June 1996 to June 2005
Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with
City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to
ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing
condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of
Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to
monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree
permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical
tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on
public and private properties.
. Account Manager
Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc.
Groveland, FL
1993 - 1996
Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan.
Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and
private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers
regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees.
. Licensed Marketing Representative
Allstate Insurance Company
Clearwater, FL
1991 - 1993
Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance.
. Store Manager
William Natorp company, Inc.
Cincinnati, OR
1983 - 1991
Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for
teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment
maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared
for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products.
EDUCATION
MBA- Masters of Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY,
ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing.
BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA.
Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management
AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Graduated 1998. Major: Management.
AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER,
Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Teclmology with emphasis in
Arboriculture.
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414.
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
o SUBMIT FIRE PREll MARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
AU$ 21 M
P~NIW$'~!NT
enveFOf!AJWAwt
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME, Cjj" '"' t c (p /1 mJ "fer I 1 nV'I) an v'O:-De O{l (I'll-<" I j-
MAILING ADDRESS: f 'f . . 'I' .
"~"~"__'_.__'______.____'_'_"__"___._____m__._m__.__...___.___.....___.~_._.___._.._.___._m..._..f.._...__.....____....._._____.__._.....__.___....._..__....__._.._.__.._._
PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL:
CELL NUMBER
..-
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
---C2uf---tL-F----CLt'!aLwa_l1L-------------------______-------~--
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
/-) h I-(.() '\ (; V D,. , --;--0---- --=
1~~{!f~1"k-q;:~~[.gL, ~--!=: ~~~~~==-
EMAIL:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: ~f1-pl1:1/tn1iZ./ v1g to rht.IWCilii ~ui._ PROJECT VA~UA~ION: $ _,?( rt~~7 '\'
STREET ADDRESS I..-bJ'dfl Arc-tllrtt5' //1, L ,.Jj,j~Md.t..L-r--F-L 33..2b~___
PARCEL NUMBER(S): ;:2 _..~ Cj .- /.<;".- 70 I g 2- 2 60 ,- lJ. ()()
PARCEL SIZE (acres): ---,~(~f{.-Ax::.C1'.3L-~-m-mmm----------- PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 22.~~m_L4:Q__:.:.~_E______m
LE GAL DESCRI PTION: __:ie.e.mmt?i.tia....c:hllVz.L_ic..__rl______..___.__m_m__mmmmmmmm__m_m__ mmmm_.m__._______mmm.m___.mm_...____
PROPOSED USE(S):
" : -.' L6; / no ( k^'j'_e ..:Lv iI. f ?' >>'<: /J~-i
~/; ~ O;;;(~ W-J- ~ J:k ~ OJ
-~--I&--~--,-~ ~____m~~--~----m-
-Am-y~/~---(;r/Y.}7-~--~--~-.-.~-'-_---.--
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-~esidential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 1. of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR)../A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
~SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
.---\/-----.----..-..-..-...-;-.--.----;------,----""'-.--.--.-.---.--.------.-.-------..-----------------...-----
,~e..p {;( lfa {/t'T/../Il! 6
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
Q ,
__~SL____..kL~uJ1):Ll.L/~-
J3
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
',' "
___~e_e..________~'i.f..r~lL221..-td..----8----..---
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
,See
afT-a c~ 177.#2'/
B
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Intill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
__________SeJl.___-L2 -Ita .dz-2Ll~/-vf
c
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
'I' . I
mm)el:____tltr.a~I2.W-i.LL-mCmm----
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
C!.€ (?
('J,.fttlr/'nl ~/L:f
c-.'
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
o Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
o Variety in materials, colors and textures;
o Distinctive fenestration patterns;
o Building stepbacks; and
o Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
s,' 1. e
cvllii ch YJ1..eflf
c
C:\Documents and Settings\derekJerguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
/' A STORMWA TER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
o
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
o
o
o
o
o
o
At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
a lla{irnLt~ll
/)
See
o
o
o
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
-flk--
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~/'
Iti
,
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
16
TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees;
~
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
ef/
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o
COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
r/" SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
'e:J SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use; _____J.:~/L________
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular fonm with the
number of required spaces; --LY-uii
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;___fi!/l____.._
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
EXISTING
6',[. acres
-----1:)...tJl1..€:---------
N'/A
REQUIRED
flJ/1l
____J_W./L__
i"-f //-+
PROPOSED
--.6.~ If ?i.C;'tf
_-dLLl.___.
_---.aJQ.J..K._
---------+1L~~,L--
'3 S-",;ptLU&
/1
__":'..t~L1kt:t.:.S
------ti/.t!L--
----./YI-'k1-----
---.-I.T:"-."~-..--.-
"V' ?V' 7 -~ (I
-~--._..-...-m....."::"..;L._......_-
:::=-:~7;t:;t=~
o REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11);
GY FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
/ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Settings\derekJerguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
o REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information:
All sides of all buildings
Dimensioned
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
Materials
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 % X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
/Y //4
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
o Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
#_____ Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
thA ?004 Florin8 FirA PrAvAntion Con A to indLJnA NFPA 1:'l MFPA 14 NFPA ?O NFPA ?q1 8nn MFPA 114? (AnnAl< H\ I,:; rAOIJirAn
_ __ _ _ _ _____ __, _. - _ - ------ -. -.. -.. - - .... -, --. - . . - 'J'" . . . --, ... . . . -- ., -...-. .... . . . . . .- '" .....-..."' -- . --,_... --
o Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
--ff.JL ____ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this~ day of
, A.D. 20~ to me and/or by
, who is personallv known has
k"
--f
---. -
"....
C:\Documents and Settings\derekJerguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 7 of 8
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
c~ lltl
I
or
I
(((Clf (A }rzfer-'
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
16ifD lire Iu. D?5 A,;~. IV -;-((jt{{(Akd~(~ j fL 3.3 7fS-_
-3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
~-1tfJ/l91~~~IL---Ceff!:tiCl1:d!d:IL---_---------------------------------------
4.
That the undersigned (has/have~ointed and (does/do) appoint:
~~L-_______~
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7.
Property Owner
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this
'2-ZAJ D
day of
&1M~-C_
1onfL- personally appeared MLctl::tt~ Q~Qj1LLLEtJ__ who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and sa
(DL
..... NIle . .. fI........
. IIftllrrrltfJ ........27.
el! I btllR . GP ...
..................,
Notary Public Signature
My Commission Expires: 5. 21 ZO I {
Notary Seal/Stamp
C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonIDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8
ATTACHMENT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Commence at the Northeast comer of Sherwood Street and Arcturas Avenue
in Section 12, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Thence go N 00 21' 58" E
along the East right of way line of said Arcturas Avenue a distance of 209.31
feet; thence leaving said right of way go N 890 16' 35" W a distance of
60.00 feet the a point on the West right of way of said Arcturas Avenue for a
Point of Beginning. Thence continue N 890 16' 35" W, a distance of 554.55
feet; thence S 250 01' 58" E, a distance of954.85 feet; thence S 890 16' 35"
E, a distance of 145.05 to a point on the said West right of way line of
Arcturas Avenue; thence N 00 21 ' 43" E along said West right of way line a
distance of 860 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 6.9 acres M.O.L.
A TT ACHMENT B
GENERAL APPLICBILITY CRITERIA
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage.
density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The proposed development is to upgrade the City existing storage facility. The proposed
enhancements include well-defined bins to store construction and waste materials, new
asphalt roadway, motorized gates, and a scale house with a restroom inside. The proposed
improvements to the facility will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density
and character of adjacent properties as the existing use remains unchanged.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development
and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof
The proposed improvement will maintain the same traffic pattern and in no way will
negatively impact the adjacent land and buildings. The renovation to the existing facility
will increase the value of the property and have a positive impact on the surrounding
industrial properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safe(v of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The health and safety of persons working in the neighborhood will be enhanced by this
improvement. Construction materials or waste materials that stored in open air will be
held in designated bins, isolated from weather impact. This will prevent pollutant from
washing into stormwater ponds and/or percolating into ground, which will impair the
water quality.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion
Traffic flow remains the same as existing condition. There will be no additional trip
generations. Therefore, traffic concerns will not be an issue.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the Immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
The proposed improvement maintains its existing use, which is consistent with the
community character of the immediate vicinity. This site is an industrial use, and the
character of immediate vicinity is also industrial.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts.
a) Visual - The proposed storage bins, tmcks washdown area, and parking spaces,
etc. will be screened well by the existing landscape buffer. Also, the esthetics
improvement to the yard will be significant once the proposed storage bins for
different construction materials are in place.
b) Acoustic - Current operation of the yard does not impact the surrounding area.
Proposed improvement does not generate any additional noise; hence 'vvill not
adversely impact adjacent properties.
c) Olfactory - The improvement to the site will include the closed system
Provided by Ecosense Inc. This is an enviromnental friendly system which will
reuse the wastewater using the filter system and chemical injections to kill algae
and bacteria which in turn will prevent associated odor.
d) Hours of Operation - The normal hours of operation will be 8 am to 5 pm,
Monday through Friday. This facility is also designed to accept only emergency
sewage dumping at nighttime. Overall, the opening time will be consistent with
the surrounding area; therefore, will have no negative affect on the adjacent llses.
A TT ACHMENT C
FLEXIBLE CRITERIA
Provide complete responses to the si:" (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPEJ11NT
PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, ill detail:
1. The development of redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use
and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
The existing use is permitted by the underlying future land use designation; therefore,
deviation is necessary to allow continue the existing use in the zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning
objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose ofthis zoning district.
The intent and purpose of the Institution "]" District is to establish areas lvhere public ({IIi!
private organizations can establish and operate institutions with a public interest ill support
of the quality of life of the citizens of the City of Clearwater without adversely impacting the
integrity of adjacent residential neighborhoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the City of
Clearwater or negatively impacting the safe and efficient movement of people and things
within the City of Clearwater.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the nonnal and orderly development and
improvement of surrounding properties.
This is the improvement to the existing use that will not result in any fitrther impact, if {ll1.1',
on adjacent property.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed
development.
This is the improvement to the existing use that will not result in any further impact, if (lll)',
on adjacent property.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category. be
compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use
characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of
the following objectives.
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible
standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic
base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
The intent of the project is to improve the existing storage yard. When the improvements
is completed, the facility will be enhanced significantly as there will be well-defined
storage bins for different construction and waste materials, equipment storage area, ([
scale house with a restroom facility in it, and a friendly enclosed loop car wash system.
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and
rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexible with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking area
justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the
City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
Proposed design, scale, intensity is consistent with surrounding light industrial area.
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed
development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements:
. Changes in horizontal building planes;
. Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.
. Variety in materials, colors, and textures;
. Distinctive fenestration patterns;
. Building stepbacks, and
. Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Proposal retains existing landscape associates with property, which has already been
determined to be appropriate for the use.
85170848
,or ,. J l ~. .
~.9).w u' - - .
___~~~QC...'-;. II
.. \ ~ ~~)'~ s r
__ 40 Rec_ ____::c
-~ '<'G ro~
C :: 2:~...:... 0 VT 01'J: "~~-5~Ob.' f) If
(3 ~~t ~:O:;rJ PERSONAL
-r
o
("
::~~
:'. . r'...'
'-1U
nU
- . [-J
"U
~ -: .:~
I-I l_
l J l~.
::: 0
.''-'1
U
'1'
W
<r:
0.: ~
Lf'l
. t")
<U t")
Ul
1-<0
h~:Z~
U)o..ri'"
I-<
"'-""x 0
I-< OM
<U@/OQIL.
2 M<U .
OOUI-<
/OQ:I:-., <U
4-H--'
~ ~t) ~
lHi to; ~
OOOri
>-)/OQo..u
"-
.r:;
"D
<U
I-<
'"
fr
h
P.
...,
~
~
...,
Ul
~
,.,
Ul
-.,
p;
,.. t",..; .. "
~UG \~, :3 \\1 r~ 'oS
DEED
REPRESENTATIVE'S
O.R. 8054 P~GE :tSi8
THIS DEED, executed the 7~ day of Au~ust , 19~, BETWEEN
JOHN R. BONNER, SR. , as Personal Representative
of the Estate of JANE B. BONNER,
Deceased , party of the first part, AND THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation
whose address is: Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33513
party of the second part,
WITNESSETH, WHEREAS said party of the first part is authorized by
law and the powers of sale contained in de~edent's Last Will and
Testament to sell to party of the second part the real property
hereinafter described without order or confirmation of court;
NOW THEREFORE, by such authority and in consideration of the
premises and the purchase price of sn HUNDRED TIIOlJSAN~ MiD NO/lOo
______________________________ DOLLARS, sald party of the first
part confirms unto the sald party of the second part, and to its
heirs (successors) and assigns forever, said certain land in sara-
County of Pinellas , State of Florida, described as follows,
to wit:
Tract 1: Begin at the Northwest corner of Section 12, Township
29 South, Range IS East, run East along section line 709.76
feet to P.O.B., thence East along section line 643.18 feet,
thence South 474.0 feet, thence West 643.18 feet parallel with
North section line, thence North 474.0 feet to Point of Beginning.
Tract 2: That part of Lots Twenty-Seven (27) and Twenty-Eight
(28), lying South of the Seaboard Airline Railroad right-of-way
in Pinellas Groves, in the Southwest Quarter (SW-l/4) of Section
I, Township 29 South, Range IS East, Plat Book 3, Page IS.
1!; 1'l73Q757 72
'11
TOTAL
LESS public rights-of-way.
Subject to restrictions and easements of record.
TOGETHER with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and
appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said party of the second
part, and to its heirs (successors) and assigns, in fee simple
forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto
executed this deed the day and year first above written.
JO~ P!tc
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
~a>{},..g:;/L
~rh
STATE OF FLORI~A
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
.
eo
.,.
,-
..
cC
1, 15AGBS;:;
.. :"'1
3, 090 ~o~ ~ ,..,
3. 009 ~EfAI1 ...:
Z..;~.,l
UO~
~ ~.
::>' ....
f-<~ciW
U-lu.f::
0:: ....~
~
-<
W
-l
U
(SEAL)
Jane B. Bonner, Deceased.
of the ,OR8GINM.
REef',,!)
Personal Representative
Estate of
1'-,"'" ;, ,,,.31.000.00
5, . . . , " '. . . .. : 1 '. l.~:o: PJ'
, 1.1. ,t I I ' ( I
1, )7'1-17-'ic<I~'-'(')_i-G"::~ "lI'l'\
Before me, an officer authoriz~d" to' tafY ackA~wledgments,
personally appeared John R. Bonner, Sr. as Personal
Representative of the Estate of Jane B. Bonner, Deceased
well known to me and known to me as the individual and the official
personal representative herein named and acknowledged before me that
he executed the foregoing deed in such capacity.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this ~ day of August
19 !l S.
Notary
My commission expires: Nolary Publi,. Stale cf riG"'!"
My Commission Expirel AF,il ~, 1987
(.'C~: '~~'(/)-lc.c.r'!/,/".'~:J bot\d41d Jhtu f,ay "t;n 111"",''''0,1.1<
/~ tJ u./ " I..
/1 (1/<'/7 11,";' .,.) :5'rl~' ) 0:) 5IJ?" 77;~
, ! 1 '.' 'l(U-rJ
"(. \/ C.(JUJ
PLANNING DEfAiiMENT
CllY OF CLEARWATER
,f
7/"/
//
I '
I'ORM 1123
t'LOIlIDA \V...."'lr Ou ,,">lR. C..:o.jO.)
'/(lO~h H;~~
~ ;'~L.. 3Lg~\~~,~"'~:"~Cf
jb
jJnfU~ JrmWI1?rnrfrJlUlltLl\
Made this
24th
day of
E'ebruary
, /1. D. 19 70 ,
iLktturrtt, STANDARD DEVELOPHEN'l' COMPANY,
a corporation e.r;istin~ under the laws of the State of
havin~ its principal place of business in the County of
State of F lor ida, partlj of the j~rst part,
CITY OF CLEARWATER,
P. O. Box 4748
of the County of PINELIAS and State of FLORIDA, (I') .,1\0'"
party of the second part, ,} 'C., t:t' (
lltlIiturlinrtf1. That the said partlj of the first part, for and in consideratiB&AN,NIN -, DEF~TMEM
the sum of Ten Dollars and other valuable considerations, X1illil~O~ -LE'RWr: !,
to it in hand paid, the r~ceipt whereof i~ hereby acknowledged, has gmnted, oar- '" l,; J.\ATEP
f!ained, sold, aliened, remised. released, conveyed and confirmed, and by these
presents doth grant, bargain, sell, alien, rem.ise, release, convey and confirm unto
the said part Y of the second part, and its heirs and assigns
forever, all that certain parcel of land lyint and being in the County of
Pine llas and State of Florida, 1nore particularly described as follows:
MCT 1:
part of Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, PINELLAS GROVES SUBDIVISION of the ~v
1/4 of Section 12, Township 29S, Range 15E, as recorded in Plat Book 3, -
Page 15, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, furthe+
escribed as follows: Start at the l~l corner of Section 12-29-15 and go
S 00025' 21" VI, 972.12' along the west section line to the P.O.B., thence
continue S 00025'21"'''1, 360.00' to the 40 acre cornerithence go -S 890
20'05" E, 1,354.56' along the 40 acre line to 'the 40 acre cornerithence
go N 00021'10" E, 360.00' along the 40 acre lineithence go N 89020'05"
, 1,354.12' to the P.O.B., , .
Florida
Pine Hap
and
,
and
>C
'"
4,,,
C'_I
~u
OC'"JU.'1
uJ ..J'e..:
r~lJ.::=:
c:: :"') '.~
(""'1 t.l \.
~s~ ~.~ ~:?
{:-:. .I~'
.:t.-'
.' ~ J
1.: ~_~~:,
_ ::1
2:
at a point where the W. Section Line of Section 12,Township 29 S,
15 E. intersect the North boundary of Sherwood Street, run E.
along Sherwood Street 709.76 feet to the P.O.B. 'fhence,E. along the
Northern boundary of ShenJood Street 644.29 feet, thence North 438.85
feet, thence w. parallel to N. line of Section 12, 643.75 feet, thence
outh 438.50 feet to P.O.B., less road right-of-way. Containing 6.49
more or less.
ubject to easements of record.
Wngl't11rr with all the tenements, heredita,ments and appurtenances, with
evenJ privilege, right, title, interest and estate, reversion, remainder and easement
thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining:
Wn ]lane ann tn l1uln the same in fee simple forever.
And the said party of the first part doth covenant with the said part y of
the second part that it is lawfully seized of the said prem,:ses; that they are free
of all incumbrances, and that it has good ri!Jht and lawful authority to sell the
same; and the said partI) of the first part does hereby fully warrant the title to said
,}fL~,. and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
./ ,_' ~ . 1Jll l]IitllPmJ Hlh~rl'ur. the said party of the first part has
'" caused these presents to be signed in its name by its President,
and its corporate seal to be afJi.xed7<z,7itIWJ;CiI:Ib'f)G,U
the day and year above written.
( Corporate
',.A,eal)
XXltW!)U
STANDARD ;f~.~VELOP~~/ CO MPA,NY .
By "f~ h'._1. V ( .' It C:..c !
DONALD BLEAKLEY, President(
, J
B>i!.lllCll. ~cuh'll UtlU JIlditll'l'l'l1 ill <Dtll' lJrrHl'lIfl':
~::.;:fl i, t,; ('-( () :,\.f<- ,/ {I
/~~'i/,-/ (,'-T~f---
lit 1).1 (.......,,(
i'JN
5,4,1). ! ;.led!:
/-IT (.. It ~
." prL.) (Ji'Jt t
,
~. - ..~
~ '
I?
t"'
P rn
III F"
)> ~ ;t. "s!:
Jl--tJO
~ !b a J~
~. ~., l1~
~ 8 'Ill. 2
11 c .~~?
r>> '
o->G'>
;JJ)>-fO
g ~ (6
(p ~ ~ 'A>
(.l "
tll ,?(
~ : 0\
Page 1 of 1
}
11
uR3295 1'1:';, 81
.. t: l<l:it sf 3lf1nr,'
atnuntg of
.
> '-I:'" 7" "
3J Ibrtby. (!]:tdify. . . TJUJt on. this . e. I...~ ".1.. day of::::;:.A-. 'a,.., q'",,~ A.. D.1910 .
before me persoll,oJ,ly appeared DONAW1BLEAI<I.EY",..,; ~
'., President <J.7'Jd: '
~~J of STANDARD .DEVELOJ?teNT COMPANY ,a corpora:Uo'f1,
uMer the laws O'f thC(J State of Flor ia a , to me knourn. to be the
person:&. described in. cnw who execu,tedthe loretoint conveyance to
CITY OF CLEARWATER
an~ acknowZedfled the ex~utton thereof to beJJ1:Jw..free aot. an4deetl as
suoh o/!icer:l., for the uses and purposes theTeinmenttoned; and that >t1retlatftJ:ed,
thereto the olftclal seal 01 saldcQrporatlon, and the sald 'imt1"Ume:nt is the aet aM
deed 01 said corporation,
JUtbtrtlS7nllsitnatu,re (J.."IU/. QtJtcial seal at Clearwater t
t,nth6 Oounty 0/. P1nellas and State of Florida, the day' and
yeal'lastalo7eaaid. ..' .' " ":
i:,' W::. .,""........,' .
. oJ.! .. . . ..',.....::J ..' . ~-~~
. , ,"-,; .'.......'..._' . '
~'~, (" L _ {;)(2(;.;;t;i,2/
JVotary PLwltC' ~ .. !', ".' ":,',
'. '"1t .~, f;yl " " ,.;
rtm;;~rt I?_~~'::~l ~:"~",": r~: f7~:':'~~.1 t! !!.~.t:~
MY CO~,~:/,~~":~,"::; ;'.., YLY Z:;, 1~1Z
liC:~S!m W~)J hiD, W. ;;;:i:~,i1i;:::;cr
.lrl y Corn:mi.ft.sion Expi;res
I '
~.. ;.. 1- ~ ~
~ ..~
jJ! ~, .. 'i
~
=
;
-
~
...
..
~
-=
'>IflllII
..
~
~
~
()
~
~
o
"';j
o
~ .~
~ ~ ~..
:e Q S
~ i
~ Ei
00
~
~
,~
JI(IG;!NAL I
j REal~D
~.
~
~ ,
';Q." . .~
~.OM
>. O..~..~.'
~' Ke
p;.~ ~ ~
';:1 ti ~.a
~,to.~,..
.0/>
(A)
t,~
~
~
Q
o
l'lj
'='
tI1
fA
g
~
o
"II
;u
o
E
8
::a
"'II
o
:0
~
(5
z
PlANNING Df1'~nJm\f,
, ciw OF CltARWA1,ER
ttn:/ /weh lin k. mvc learwater,com/wp-hlin k7 ITm:HTP-Di .'ml:lv :I"n1( ?r:lrnp=vp"x,."p""inn l<p,,= WT T m<> CTP n; en 1.,,,
') /1 7./')00"1
ATTACHMENT D
STORMW A TER NARRATIVE
Sherwood yard is a part of the Clearwater Airpark Master Plan, which was designed by
PBS & J in 2004. The approved Stormwater master plan was accounted for the increased
impervious area to this facility. Per sheet C-4A, Pond P5000 is designed to take runoff
from Sherwood Yard via the proposed ditch. Please see the approved Stormwater Master
Plan of Clearwater Airpark sheet C-9 and C-I O.