The URL can be used to link to this page

VOLUME 5 . " .-'" Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 22, 2005 9:40 AM Ferguson, Derek Ready, cky Old Florida Derek, Cky will be talking to you about putting some information on the web about the Old Florida District. Attached is the bulk of the announcement if you need it. Thanks! ~L "= ~ City Council Old Florida DISCU,.. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 City Council Old Florida Discussion - 8/29/05 The Old Florida District will be discussed at the August 29,2005 City Council Work Session in Council Chambers at 9:00 AM. Conclusions and recommendations based on the four public meetings will be presented to the Council by the Planning Department for the Council's guidance and direction. Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 22,20058'34 AM Delk, Michael RE: Old Florida Thanks! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 8:30 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Flonda I've got a senior management meeting at 9 but I can meet when I return. michael -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 8:08 AM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Importance: High Could I meet with both of you as soon as possible this morning, Thanks! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Friday, August 19, 20052:17 PM Ready, cky Revised Drawings Cky, I put the folder in the S drive under Beach Issues\Old Florida Study\Final Materials, Thanks again! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Hope it works OK! Thanks, ~ Third meeting presentation. ppt.., Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Jarzen, Sharen Friday, August 19, 2005 11 :44 AM Ready, cky Power Point 1 ;,' t;cv '" ,A r, . ;, ~ V, " 'OldFlorida District.;, ' ;<, ? : ~ v'~ A, "~~2-o .;: ~ ,~" A/" ~ "'.0, ' "'~ ~.::; ::: " } ,{ , J i.~: ~, ~:, ,. ? . Third N eighborhoo4 Planning M~eting ~. p<- 'p, "" AO" ~:*, tJ" ~?l '%'':::( # ,. "zt>> A ~ 1m':;. /w,' , y 0. ~,' c:: ~, ~, "r '5' . '4f!*"', ,v" ). .; ".... .,.Ph~ 'May 11, 2005 7:00.P~.M. .. .". . A., . Clearwater, FloricHl ',' ~, v'> , " , ' '> ' ,,* "" : j;1.' , : {>, "^~ f' ~ F .+ - - - - '""Old Florida Basemaps'"" · Eight groups created 14 maps · Participants applied dots to 12 maps · Total dots- 184 24 from within Old Florida Second Old Florida Public Planning Meeting April ~O, ~005 Residence Location of Attendees ...lQ.'I'.t-~'-'lSl ~:;\ \, IV , \-; ','.of" f'{~,~^ [;i'~~/', '; I~"'- ....l":t:~~_~/'\~ J~*i~~~*!: 'J' -ii' ; :l:J<lj'f"::,. ,~ '<~:l:)... >-t< .. --l tftt;;r ~"'_, p. '~I~'"::t1.1~ 't i , "\'~~-.:12:-~-J;1J ~(,-::::":~k~~~,! 1 ':. ), '!.k:~"*l~':' , 'I ~~~F ,,!:ii,:.h,:_,,((~,;,~,'1, ' L1 ~",", ;.i", lJ , . , ' "" !,' > , -',:: ,ti ,~! > J d: ;i;,~ '" I, "." _'" T~ ," < ,:. ':i \e> '-.( iJ~ '''~.: "~' "'~\!" i:""'1 \._"~;\\\\\~ ~ Yd*4~ ~.. '\ " ~l .-,~-' ~_ ,..... "":~~I:: "- \..'.~. :,",":;;'''q Ih4l./ :f:~, 1 \~'; ~\')y"~ :~~~!\ t~f~~{\ (2 ":-Tflt'i \ > ;~;;'iIS\, ....~,;, ~t\ S~t:' :-~\ ~ ,t'~~,;,,:_~JA\ / ,,:!'t....:--\,..~:-< '<~::: l\lj \f1 " t'-"~ ~ I ....... " {~" .1<1~.r -.~ ~ tr> _ r1'-t .~~ " .... - ...............k>..", 1 T "";:t .~~. '-'>-1 t-~>-l ...f jl -:'! '~r,,'" I I tl! \~ fl- "~I :~,,-~ :,I,.t;,I~~_t~_~7",' ~ ((,,~:L.;, -'~i >'~ ,:{ .~ ~ " ) </',; < 7'~>r\'L.1' :!~l 'i ~i.." /./; I~l~: r;J~ ;J:~ .:.. --I~r"\ --- "-" ........,..1 :,0..; ;:<:.. n~ J I~;V;;' "~, ,,/";...-" ~7 ...~:.f i-'1Jr j''?'''-;" " ......... -< '--t:;' ,""I j~t~"~~'?h,;~; "",, g" fr"o" m<.z> :,la~ r' e S of 'iJ,' f -- --. , " I 50' .-~-5 --"-- .. __ ..', ""'- )'~!!i~~;~~!~"':;jio~~ rlld"'" FI' :'d', , I d" g ,;_-,~{li:[:::~c:~':~~~;{i;!{~b;~ ~ . ' , ~rI a,,} C U In \:." '? ~i~:(]~. ~, "'<" > >, : I C\", d K" "<, r'''-.:;''~,':'/f4~~,,~':s:, __ ':, \ ;: k) all Y " - <":1\':.,;1: ;~, ~,1;,_ :~~') " ~"-. ''''I~l'''' -.,<,-....-./ :',~l >/ (--- '", I ''''', / Clearwater Beach \ '" \,.'\ "... 23,.from are N of Old Flor'da Old Florida district III " !! - ," -~11'l lC~&.~ ~ I .~-=-I _ ~. I.. '..., : , ~.sI-l~i ), _ .,,1 i _'" ."1 ' ~~~.st- I ,,11 I ... ...... I l I I ., f :,:, ..;..... ;~~::J : .'-1 _ B.l~L >~~'~ __ Sand Key . I: , I, ~IIl.l!';';' :~~,~::.;" ~~;lcURL~RO outside of Clearwa~er;~~~~::)~>~7":i ~:'~ /j . - 1>/ -- /' ",I y. f -- -- :~: / ,;/ /;/.,: (-'~f'/'>:>~ " / ":y~' xi j-<-r...........!'"-- i..f' 'l :'; <'1 '-'1 ,,,' ~"', r i! ,'-"" .,:" -.. I' 'I" , . "j m :rrty-", OJ'.,, _ t '::~_~~ " ~., \:;/. ':('_:lV'l x :1'''':- "'\ ,~-', .- /' I !jJ fl ' ,,1. '( _ ~ 1 v, ~ I " 'I y,~r':r,,"~> v'll o I ''\J{(~'~''~j-'I;:';, \~ .,_~,,;-l~''';' '. i SR"'. ., I \\ 'd'"".. \. ,,'f ' I"'>.\\. .y(nyf...-.. .... .v~ r' ~ ~ ,~ '-,.,,, K---;5 it'f>~~ ~\". -;'~~'\,-j z ,~ <~~ ~"" <' -.. ,( ~ ~-'~ ,~-c" ~~ ~ " 1 + .. t t . ~ k ;;. "~"' i.,~- "I I C ~{:~j.::'?~';.:""\'~A'_ ;J~_' ...._>r1;;- x '->. ,l A ;~.' \~'1 :'. f-"J" i J'Y I' ~ .! -Ll~'~~- r ("''''-'. ,- ~ ~" !:l? '.:,.:.:-,: ."~ "r,l,:'k '=~ 1 i" _i; --\..':::-::." : ," f -, :=-r'!JL" ",' 't>>:, j~- I "'~ '~'~-;l?~t:~; ~,;q-Sl'->'~ j~; :\tt l, ~~~.. "' i~.::' ,~.', " ,} ~..~"o:_ \.~::;~)t~-=t'~~:l __'_M , ' I I ,7:> i'iA'~t" ,_I ~~~~</0,~\,;; t _ ,~-,~",~ ,)'.1{~:\', .' r': ", :~;' I ~, .-, .12:: :' : I ' " t~;j, / "U -, I ;:,\ ,'J '~ , j , "<~EW:.~:.~,~,~L -'~~~t~!.~'::r\-, .\F>;"', '--1(:'~ f..J ',i.,~: ,">,o:-~-- -. :;~'D~EWST ....,..; , I,'" ,l.1'. .." ; L ", ,[II' ,'.. . .-11, '.""", '.{I "'.' ,~T:. '~: l: ,,:' ,':'-' ;..:-:; il r, ; ,; " :c"' " L.. '1-, f:':{ '~7,>cf;!: ',. P,'? '-" ,. "-"', ,~'" 'rr~:j ~".." fj, -', 'f;;-,/'1. 111", , , ~J:;':.:l' >~.. ,t,., ~.: :-::::Ft;1{~;~'J ':;"1~' ., ,,:\,~.~-ttf-:~,~;~'lr:;;':::~' L.....-~-- SR60 " .., '- ~",...--. . -I) ,.. ... 'J~'" '.__...",,_,L ", I,~ "0~'/' ,~ ' .;;!.. t --J;;; (.. , I '1 ~ I' T' " ~ 1.. I:; r >....' > !, ~ ,1' ~ J .... > "',' ,'". :I[ I" ',' j'-::'''-i-';'->'''1~,{,1f.,,, ,~ , ,1 ,::-:'.d.[ \ '?.=t ' 'i lc ;.,i-.j' , ;'=-;. ' t" ,.! 'Or: '[ .. ',;,)' , J'" . 1 ,,~, I r .. [ , ,1-".. ':---:---1 ' I ' , ' c>,'. , ~ ' t L~,' ~n ^~' --;- ':-:,~ IHv~ Y,,, _ -:~ ,1 ~I &~ " ' , ,F itr' " -- ~ :~L;' d--1,'; ~~:i1 \:' :;~ ,) -;', ,.. , ;--;-'\, I i"rll .. .-;--- " 1- <f'"'.r4 ,~1,. '-:i-J:.., ,-'-". '\ ~"t J ~r1:-' 1 ,""->--< .~~ \ f 1~7 il..'" ,';<" tiff' .: ';?~ ,d l' i . . ' L , --' 1 L \ ' .,<, '8ELLEAIR RD , ~ 'j'! ~i' -, lii ~.:-_~~ ID ... ... CANADA U.S., OUTSIDE OF FLA l/ / OUTSIDE OF U.S. AND CANADA "'. ~~.{ FLORIDA- COUNTIES TO NORTH FLORIDA- COUNTIES TO EAST FLORIDA- COUNTIES TO SOUTH Basemap Findings Percentage of Dots (184 total) Boat slips along south edge of Rec. Center 6.00/0 Keep small motels/ provide incentives for small motels 6.00/0 Multi-family, overnight accoml.s along Clearwater Harbor 6.00/0 Stop excessive height/ no more setback variances along beach 6.00/0 All others 31.00/0 Neighborhood commerical along Mandalay Avenue 5.4 0/0 Table 1 -Most popular plan -28 dots for "entire plan" -51 dots overall -Opposed to the granting of setback . varIances Table 6 -8 dots for "entire ,I plan" Table 2 dos& J-condos , ots) Table 4 t slips dots) Table 3 · Received zero dots .Up to 100' height along East side of Mandalay Ave. · Desires tourists, not condominiums · 1- Presentation of two sets of varying plans of Old Florida, based on last meeting's dots: - 3 plans showing different distribution of uses - 3 plans showing diverse max. building heights · 2- Post plans on wall · 3- Place one RED dot on favorite "heights" plan; place one BL DE dot on favorite "uses" plan - May leave additional comments on sheet by each plan · June 8, 2005 - Presentation of refined maps, showing streetscape, setbacks, and building mass, based on tonight's voting - Review results of entire public process r ~ ___,0.... , ~ ---........ - . OO'~1Jxrm l1~lN! .:OOO>>d 'I':s:.:N'td~SNYt'J ~ik~01M, t<1fCNV'k! ~~.1n .t#.m:)-.,a:W~~j~~lO... ~ - '11 NOUdO JJf!)'lH . Hnd 1115 ~ ~ o i w = , ~ g & ~ g ~ ~ ~ ! Q ~ '" ~ ~ \J: e ~ i ~ ~ ~. ~ i i I I t I I t I I t , .... , " I~ "" "'" z f o ~ = I g ii ~ 'i! ~ ~ ~ '" 3 ~ :;r ~ ~ :; l " & ~ ~ <: ~ !!; ~ ~ ~ ~. " .1 I I 'I I u il~ ~ II dl sIt I In i b i II ,. .. , A Ie - ~ z f o i , ~ Ii ~ il ~ . 8 " ,; , l' i- f ! " r ~ , i I I. It n III i II I Ie ~ ~ o i I Z ~ Ii d i c f ~ $ I I I i I t ~I e! U ~I ~~ Ig~ h H in i Ie r------ I i I I ); " ~ I > ! ? ' ~ z f o :0 !S ~ ~ ~ foil 1;; " " , " '< '7 '} ~ i "I S I " l~ f ',I , j j I I 1 , _J Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: POINSETTIA GO'-SO'.pdf BAY ESPLANADE 3S'-SO'.pdf Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Jarzen, Sharen Friday, August 19, 2005 11 :24 AM Ready, cky Drawings ,fJ 1 (:) I LO N o I o ~b I LO (I') - - 6'-OB FEMA 1- POINSETTIA AVENUE PL 601 RIGHT-OF-WAY PL 151.011 i I I 151 bl SETBACK WEST 141.011 21 131.611 131-611 21 [ n 1 n j 151 j SETBACK EAST LOOKING NORTH ON POINSEITiA AVE o I o L{) - - , ()" FEMA +1- BAY ESPLANADE - 6'-fJ FEMA +/- b I Lo .- o I o 9 L{) ~ WEST PL 15'-0' . r I 1 15' 1 SETBACK LOOKING NORTH ON BAY ESPlANADE II dlP(" ", 'l ~ L ,tl l '"' 'l< o I L{) ('f) , ' <~ ~< , .-, -r 6'-fJ FEMA +/- EAST Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Thanks, Cky! MANDALAY 60'.pdf Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Jarzen, Sharen Friday, August 19, 2005 9:27 AM Ready, cky Drawing 1 o I o ~ 6'-0' FEMA +1- MANDALAY Pl Pl 801 RIGHT-OF-WAY EAST WEST MANDALAY LOOKING NORTH o I o ~ Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jim Graham [jimgda@tampabay,rr,com] Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:06 PM Jarzen, Sharen Re: Old Florida Ok we will do it. Jim Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com wrote: >Jim, Even though the City Council meeting is not until September 1, the Clerk's office will need to preview the Power Point presentation on August 24. Consequently, we'll need to have the electronic versions of the drawings ASAP after next Monday. There shouldn't be a lot of drawings to change, and there should be very minimal changes on each drawing. I'll get the paper copies to you ASAP, hopefully by the end of this week. Thanks. > >Sharen Jarzen, AICP >Planning Department >City of Clearwater >727-562-4626 > > > > 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:52 AM Goudeau, cyndie Vaughan, Karen; Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida Cyndie - this will be a memo from Michael to Bill. How should we enter this into FYI? There will be no Council Cover Memo -----Onglnal Message----- From: Goudeau, Cyndle Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 5:17 PM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Vaughan, Karen Subject: RE: Old Flonda Assuming you still want this on the August 29 work session, I will need to preview the power point on Wednesday, August 24 at 1 :30. Re the item - of course you will have to put It in with a date of 9/15, Do you think it will be in by Wednesday? I will be at a conference Thursday and Friday and the packets go out on Monday, -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 5:10 PM To: Goudeau, Cyndle Subject: Old Flonda Cyndie - we have not completed our Old Florida work so I wanted to let you know it has not been entered into FYI yet. We will probably have a PowerPoint as well. Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina,c layton@myclecirwater,com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, August 16,200510:52 AM Goudeau, cyndie Vaughan, Karen; Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida cyndie - this will be a memo from Michael to Bill. How should we enter this into FYI? There will be no Council Cover Memo, -----anginal Message----- From: Goudeau, Cyndle Sent: Monday, August is, 2005 5:17 PM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Vaughan, Karen Subject: RE: Old Flonda Assuming you still want this on the August 29 work session, I will need to preview the power point on Wednesday, August 24 at 1 :30, Re the item - of course you will have to put it in with a date of 9/15, Do you think it will be in by Wednesday? I will be at a conference Thursday and Frid~y and the packets go out on Monday, -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, August is, 2005 5:10 PM To: Goudeau, Cyndle Subject: Old Flonda cyndie - we have not completed our Old Florida work so I wanted to let you know it has not been entered into FYI yet. We will probably have a PowerPoint as well. Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina,clayton@myclearwater,com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: . Clayton, Gina Monday, August 15, 2005 5:52 PM Jarzen, Sharen FW: Old Florida Argh !! I just realized the Old Florida stuff needed to get finalized and into FYI. Please see the Clerk's comments below, I told her I don't know if we can make Wed, but we Will try, I also told her we could have the PowerPoint ready by August 24th, Sorry - time just slipped away from me on this project. Next time I don't respond in a timely manner to you - please hound me!! I will get my notes to you on the memo on Tuesday, I also sent you an Invitation to meet on this Tuesday morning. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Goudeau, Cyndle Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 5:17 PM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Vaughan, Karen Subject: RE: Old Flonda Assuming you still want this on the August 29 work session, I will need to preview the power point on Wednesday, August 24 at 1 :30, Re the item - of course you will have to put it in with a date of 9/15, Do you think it will be in by Wednesday? I will be at a conference Thursday and Friday and the packets go out on Monday, ----.Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 5:10 PM To: Goudeau, Cyndle Subject: Old Flonda cyndie - we have not completed our Old Florida work so I wanted to let you know it has not been entered into FYI yet. We will probably have a PowerPoint as well. Gina L, Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina,clayton@myclearwater,com 727-562 -458 7 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:54 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Flonda This Will just require a memo - there will be no agenda cover memo, I'm not sure exactly how we will put in FYI. - we will need to coordinate with the Clerk. We Will just be asking for direction. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, August 04,20053:56 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Gina, Attached are the original bullets placed into a memo form. Is this what you're looking for, or do you want another approach? Also, what format does this need to be In for City Council as far as an agenda cover memorandum for FYI; will the Planning Department actually be asking them to approve something? Does this require a staff report, or just a memo? Thanks, << File: Memo to B. Horne - Old Florida,doc >> Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:56 PM Clayton, Gina Old Florida Gina, Attached are the onglnal bullets placed into a memo form, Is this what you're looking for, or do you want another approach? Also, what format does this need to be in for City Council as far as an agenda cover memorandum for FYI; will the Planning Department actually be asking them to approve something? Does this require a staff report, or just a memo? Thanks, ~ "lemo to B. Horne - Old Florida... Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 LL 'U+~I"'; ^'h" ~,i:i ~.arwater >- .,,<< ~,~" - '"*- ~~~ u To: Bill Home From: Michael Delk, Planning Director Date: August 4, 2005 RE: Old Florida District Beach by Design (BBD), the 2001 special area plan governing development on Clearwater Beach, established eight distinct districts within Clearwater Beach to govern land use. The Old Florida District is the northern boundary of the area governed by BBD. It is comprised of 36.4 acres of land and is bounded by the Gulf of Mexico on the west, Clearwater Harbor on the east, properties fronting the north side of Somerset Street on the north and Rockaway Street on the south. The Old Florida District is neither a residential neighborhood like the one to the north, nor a tourist district like the one to the south; it is a blend of both. The BBD plan states that single- family homes and townhouses, with low to mid-rise building heights, should be the preferred type of structures in a redeveloped Old Florida District. However, the City's land development code generally does not support these options. For example, BBD does not mention overnight accommodations for the area, but the development code regulations allow this use. Because of the discrepancies between the area's zoning and land use patterns; as well as inconsistencies between the BBD provisions and the underlying zoning, the Planning Department prepared an in-depth review of a portion of the Old Florida District in September 2004. The review indicated that these inconsistencies made the administration of land development provisions difficult in the Old Florida District and resulted in unrealistic or uncertain property owner and developer expectations. Consequently, the Planning Department requested a nine-month building moratorium between February and November of 2005 in order to eliminate the discrepancies between BBD and the underlying land use and zoning; however, the moratorium was rejected by both the Community Development Board and the City Council. Consequently, four public meetings were scheduled for citizens who were interested in sharing their vision as to how they would like to see the area developed. The meetings were very well attended. The first meeting had approximately 100 attendees, while the second had about 70 in attendance, with the last two having about 60 persons, During the first meeting on April 6, the participants were divided into small groups, each with a facilitator, Each group was asked to identify the strengths/weaknesses and opportunities/ threats to the District. Subsequently, each group's lists were displayed on the wall and participants were invited to rank those they perceived to be the most important. At the second public meeting on April 20, participants were asked to sketch their vision for Old Florida on blank parcel maps of the district. They were asked to identify desired transition buffers, densities, heights, setbacks and land uses. At the end of the exercise, those attending assigned dots to the map features with which they most agreed. The highest ranked features from the maps developed at the previous meeting were distilled into six maps - three containing land uses and three containing height preferences. These were discussed and ranked by the attendees at the third public meeting on May 11. Three of the maps were ultimately selected, one receiving the most votes for the uses option and two depicting height options. Two maps were selected for the height options as they both received about the same number of votes. The uses option selected featured mixed use along Mandalay Avenue south of Somerset Street with the first floor devoted to retail/office uses with residential above, exclusive of the City- owned facilities adjacent to Mandalay. The portion of Mandalay Avenue north of Somerset Street, as well as the rest ofthe district not devoted to public use, was shown as multi-family and overnight accommodations, (See Exhibit #1.) The two height options were somewhat of a mirror image of each other, The first option, except for the public uses, showed a height of 50 feet for the lots fronting the Gulf of Mexico and those on the north side of Somerset, while the remainder depicted a height of75 feet. (See Exhibit #2.) The second option, except for the public uses, showed a height of 35 feet along the east side of Bay Esplanade and the north side of Somerset Street, a height of 50 feet between Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Avenue, with a height of 60 feet in the remainder of the district. (See Exhibit #3.) The fourth meeting on June 8 presented the summary results of the first three meetings, as well as suggestions and discussions related to setbacks and heights. One ofthe major concerns of the public comments was that a canyon effect be avoided. The attached sketches depict solutions to that situation, Exhibit #4 shows buildings at a height of35 feet and 50 feet along Bay Esplanade with two different size setbacks, Exhibit #5 depicts two buildings at a height of75 feet. A building stepback is shown with a front setback of 15 feet with a sidewalk (with the stepbacks totaling 20 feet), while a straight-line building height is shown with a front setback of 15 feet with a sidewalk, plus an additional setback of20 feet to offset the straight-line building. The street has a right-of-way of 60 feet. Mandalay with a right-of-way of 80 feet is shown on Exhibits #6 and #7, Exhibit #6 depicts a sidewalk setback of 10 feet with a building stepback of 20 feet and a height of 60 feet, while the opposite side of the drawing depicts a sidewalk setback of 10 feet with an additional 20 feet setback for a straight-line building of 60 feet. Exhibit #7 shows the same size setbacks and - stepbacks with building heights of75 feet. (Note that stepbacks are shown in either one or two increments on different sketches,) Exhibit #8 shows a proposed site layout and a building isometric that depicts a building of 35 feet with a setback of 15 feet on all sides, other than for Bay Esplanade that has a setback of 20 feet. Exhibit #9 shows a building height of75 feet with the same setbacks on all sides, except for a front setback of35 feet on Bay Esplanade. The property within the Old Florida District where development would take place is zoned as either Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) or Tourist. MHDR allows attached and detached dwellings and community residential homes. Under the flexible standard development process, a number of other uses are permitted, including overnight accommodations. The Tourist District zone allows a large number of options under the flexible standard development process. These include residential dwellings, offices, overnight accommodations, retail sales, nightclubs and restaurants. As a result of this planning process, the Planning Department is recommending that a specific height requirement of 50 feet be provided for the Old Florida District. Additionally, the Department recommends that performance standards be increased, particularly in the areas of setbacks and landscaping.‹ cc: Gary Brumback Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, August 04,20051 :10 PM Ready, Cky Pictures ~ ~ ~ ~ MVC-020SJPG MVC-021SJPG MVC-022SJPG MVC-025SJPG ~ MVC-023SJPG MVC-024SJPG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MVC-027SJPG MVC-028SJPG MVC-029SJPG MVC-030SJPG MVC-032SJPG MVC-033S.JPG MVC-031S.JPG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MVC -035SJ PG MVC-026SJPG MVC-037SJPG MVC-038SJPG MVC-039SJPG MVC-040SJPG MVC-041S.JPG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MVC-034SJPG MVC-043SJPG MVC-044S.JPG MVC-036SJPG MVC-045SJPG MVC-042SJPG Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, August 04, 2005 8:56 AM Clayton, Gina Old Florida I talked with Cky. He'll be gOing out to the Beach this afternoon to take some pictures. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina . Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:09 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida He has two research projects that shouldn't require a tremendous amount of time. I need him to try to resolve by the end of the week. He should have time to also work on Old Florida. due to the pending deadline - he needs to start working on Old FlOrida. I can talk to him about that if you want. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:59 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Gina, I know that Cky has some other responsibilities. What priority do you want him to put on getting the photographs for Old Florida? Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 01, 2005 9:59 AM Ready, Cky FW: Photos Cky, Attached are some photos of the beach that are already available. Sharen Jarzen, AICP . Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----anginal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:32 PM To: 'Jlmgda@tampabay.rr.com' Subject: Photos Jim, attached are the photos that were in the file. I assume some of them are the ones you want. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GrandBellagloBayw CommodoresRet.jp condocomplex1.jpg GrandBellagloBayw GrandBellagloBayw GrandBellagloBayw GrandBellagloBayw atch4.jpg 9 atch.jpg atchO.jpg atch1.jpg atch2.jpg ~ ~ ~ GrandBellagloBayw GrandBellagioBayw Gulfside_townhome Ocean_ReeC060 1. Regatta_0601.jpg Bnghtwater Sanibel condo.jpg atch3.jpg atch5.jpg s_beach.jpg jpg 116.JPG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Tropic_Isle_0601.jp Brightwater GulfvlewS_514,JPG Bnghtwater Brightwater . Mandalay Brightwater 145.jpg 9 125,JPG 130.JPG 140,JPG 501.BelleHarbor,JPC: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Bnghtwater Bnghtwater 181.Jpg Somerset 14.jpg Bnghtwater 200.jpgMandalay 501c,JPG GulfviewS_700.JPG Mandalay 447,JPG 200b.jpg ~ ~ ~ Mandalay 501b.JPG Mandalay 483,JPG Mandalay SOla,JPG ~ ~ ~ Bayway 620,JPG BaywaL656,JPG BaywaL674,JPG BaywaL692,JPG BaywaL850,JPG Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Wednesday, July 27,20055:10 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida Thanks Sharen - you are always kind and forgiving!! -----anginal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, July 27,20058:26 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Gina, You didn't have to apologize that you didn't get the Old Florida material back to me earlier. I can only imagine how many things you have going, and I'm amazed at how much you do accomplish in a short amount of time - and always With a sense of humor! Besides I'm used to having a heavy workload (I think I must be an adrenalin junky - scary thought, isn't it!). Anyway, have a good day! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Friday, July 22, 2005 10:57 AM Clayton, Gina Accepted: EAR and Beach By Design 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:54 AM 'Jim Graham' RE: Height options #1 & 2 Terry & Jim, Just a note to let you know that I received the boards OK yesterday after you dropped them off while I was at a meeting. Thanks so much! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Graham [mailto:graham81@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:33 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Height options #1 & 2 Sharen, I sent an old e-mail with what I believe are the PDF files you are looking for. I am also sending them under this e-mail. Please call me when you have opened the drawings and let me know if these are the drawings you are looking for. Thanks, Terry 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, July 11, 2005 8:30 AM 'Jim Graham' RE' [Fwd: Beach by Design] Thanks. before. These are the right maps, but for whatever reason, I had not received them Anyway, we're all set now! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Graham [mailto:graham81@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:28 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: [Fwd: Beach by Design] 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, July 11, 2005 8:29 AM 'Jim Graham' RE: Height options #1 & 2 Thanks, Terry. This is it! I appreciate it. Sharen Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Graham [mailto:grahamB1@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, July DB, 2005 2:33 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Height options #1 & 2 Sharen, I sent an old e-mail with what I believe are the PDF files you are looking for. I am also sending them under this e-mail. Please call me when you have opened the drawings and let me know if these are the drawings you are looking for. Thanks, Terry 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jim Graham [graham81@tampabay.rr.com] Friday, July 08,20052:33 PM Jarzen, Sharen Height options #1 & 2 ~ H13.pdf ~ H21.pdf Sharen, I sent an old e-mail with what I believe are the PDF files you are looking for. I am also sending them under this e-mail. Please call me when you have opened the drawings and let me know if these are the drawings you are looking for. Thanks, Terry 1 I 0 0"1 I 'l'I,,:t: , : ~ ~ L'~ 8~~ om ~5~ " I BOAT SUPS SIn: PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION #1 I SITE PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION #1 OLD flORIDA DISTRICT CU:ARWATER DUCH. FLORIDA GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIA TES, P A ARCHITECTS-PLANNER5 I1Jll '~)-'iOO sa; NOIn Street S"te 1201 o-drn. Fk>r"j.. 3~"8 FAX '33-~555 NORTH ~ PUBlJC JO'-O. BUILDING HEIGHT II 75 -0' BUILDING HEIGHT REVISIONS I 0 \'J f 'I!! p:t: I 'cO gi~ 0" ~5~ " I '~ 'i., BOAT SUPS SITE PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION #1 NORTH ~ PUBUC ~ 3S '0' BUILDING HEIGHT U 60"0' BUILDING HEIGHT 50'-0" OUILDING HEIGHT GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIA TES P A I SITE PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION #2 OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT CLEARWATER DfACH. FLORIDA !U!IIi1II'f l'llffj I 1Ii'1!1! I I l:i . ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS /121J 1:n-'~OO 585 M~n Slr~el 5~1. I~OI D"".d1~ FlorIda :H"B FAX 133-'555 REVISIONS BY CK Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jim Graham [graham81 @tampabay.rr.com] Friday, July 08, 2005 2:28 PM Jarzen, Sharen [Fwd: Beach by Design] Bl Beach by Design 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Friday, June 10, 2005 1 :33 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida sorry I did not get to read this until now. Thanks. for the update. -----Ongmal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:08 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Importance: High Gina, the deliverables for the Old Florida project are to be design concepts and potential development scenarios that are in both graphic and compatible electronic formats. These may include photographs, sketches, drawings, computer graphics and/or any other agreed upon documentation determined to be necessary through the planning and public input process. Oelrverables shall be accessible by the parties (Word is the preferred format for written materials and JPEG/POF for graphics). The contract also states that the consultant shall transfer, assIgn and make available to the CIty all property and materials, written and/or electronic, authorized for preparation and/or paid for by the City. How do you want to handle this? Do you want to them to come to the meetrng tomorrow so it can be discussed, or do you want me to telephone them and ask them to bring by later all the materials that were developed? It does say in an e-mail between Karl and Jim written after the date of the contract in order to clarify it, that they will attend a meeting after the last Old Florida meeting for a synopsis review of the information presented to the public. Thanks. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:27 PM Brumback, Garry RE: Old Florida Project Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate it! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:20 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Florida Project OK...thanks a million! Nice job last night. Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Onglnal Message---n From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09,20054:14 PM To: Brumback, Garry Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Flonda Project I've already talked with her. She said that she had talked to her editor and, at least for now, their decision was to do the story after Council acts on the matter. I'm mailing her a CD copy of Jim Graham's presentation so they'll have it for future reference. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:28 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Flonda Project Thanks Sharen, Please don't forget we owe a copy of Graham's slides to Angela at the Tribune. Garry Brumback 1 Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:08 PM To: Brumback, Garry Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Project FYI, Attached is the Planning Department's PowerPoint presentation that was shown at the Old Florida meeting last night. I also have a copy of Jim Graham's presentation. However, the files for his presentation are too large to send via e-mail. I'm going to check with IT and see if his presentation can be posted on the web, along with our other material. However, in the meantime, in case you need it for reference, I could burn Jim's presentation on CD and send it over to you. << File: Old Florida Presentation - 4th Meeting.ppt >> Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727 -562-4626 2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Brumback, Garry Thursday, June 09, 20054:20 PM Jarzen, Sharen Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina RE: Old Florida Project OK...thanks a million! Nice job last night. Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----anginal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20054:14 PM To: Brumback, Garry Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Flonda Project I've already talked With her. She said that she had talked to her editor and, at least for now, their decision was to do the story after Council acts on the matter. I'm mailing her a CD copy of Jim Graham's presentation so they'll have It for future reference. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Thursday, June 09,20053:28 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Flonda Project Thanks Sharen, Please don't forget we owe a copy of Graham's slides to Angela at the Tribune. Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:08 PM To: Brumback, Garry Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Project FYI, Attached IS the Plannrng Department's PowerPoint presentation that was shown at the Old Florida meeting last night. I also have a copy of Jim Graham's presentation. However, the files for hiS presentation are too large to send via e-mail. 1 I'm gOing to check with 11 and see if his presentation can be posted on me web, along with our other material. However, in the meantime, in case you need It for reference, I could burn Jim's presentation on CD and send it over to you << File: Old Florida Presentation - 4th Meetlng.ppt >> Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, June 09,20054:14 PM Brumback, Garry Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina RE: Old Florida Project I've already talked with her. She said that she had talked to her editor and, at least for now, their decision was to do the story after Council acts on the matter. I'm mailing her a CD copy of Jim Graham's presentation so they'll have it for future reference. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Ongrnal Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Thursday, June 09,20053:28 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Flonda Project Thanks Sharen, Please don't forget we owe a copy of Graham's slides to Angela at the Tribune. Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Ongrnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09,20053:08 PM To: Brumback, Garry Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Project FYI, Attached IS the Planning Department's PowerPoint presentation that was shown at the Old Florida meeting last night. I also have a copy of Jim Graham's presentation. However, the files for his presentation are too large to send via e-mail. I'm going to check with IT and see if his presentation can be posted on the web, along with our other material. However, in the meantime, in case you need it for reference, I could burn Jim's presentation on CD and send it over to you. << File: Old Florida Presentation - 4th Meeting.ppt >> Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:08 PM Clayton, Gina Old Florida Importance: High Gina, the deliverables for the Old Florida project are to be design concepts and potential development scenarios that are in both graphic and compatible electronic formats. These may include photographs, sketches, drawings, computer graphics and/or any other agreed upon documentation determined to be necessary through the planning and public input process. Oelrverables shall be accessible by the parties . (Word is the preferred format for written materials and JPEG/PDF for graphics). The contract also states that the consultant shall transfer, assign and make available to the City all property and materials, written and/or electronic, authorized for preparation and/or paid for by the City. How do you want to handle this? Do you want to them to come to the meeting tomorrow so it can be discussed, or do you want me to telephone them and ask them to bring by later all the materials that were developed? It does say in an e-mail between Karl and Jim written after the date of the contract in order to clarify it, that they will attend a meeting after the last Old Florida meeting for a synopsis review of the information presented to the public. Thanks. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Plannrng Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Brumback, Garry Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:28 PM Jarzen, Sharen Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina RE: Old Florida Project Thanks Sharen, Please don't forget we owe a copy of Graham's slides to Angela at the Tribune. Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Origrnal Message---n From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:08 PM To: Brumback, Garry Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Project FYI, Attached is the Planning Department's PowerPoint presentation that was shown at the Old Florida meeting last night. I also have a copy of Jim Graham's presentation. However, the files for his presentation are too large to send via e-mail. I'm going to check with IT and see if his presentation can be posted on the web, along with our other material. However, In the meantime, in case you need it for reference, I could burn Jim's presentation on CD and send it over to you. << File: Old Florida Presentation - 4th Meeting ppt >> Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:08 PM Brumback, Garry Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Old Florida Project FYI, Attached is the Planning Department's PowerPolnt presentation that was shown at the Old Florida meeting last night. I also have a copy of Jim Graham's presentation. However, the files for his presentation are too large to send via e-mail. I'm going to check with IT and see if his presentation can be posted on the web, along with our other material. However, in the meantime, in case you need it for reference, I could burn Jim's presentation on CD and send it over to you. ~ Old Florida Presentation - 4th... Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 ,.' ", '" ,. p , > '$ > ,1 ~>' ~ 1 ~ -'~ " 0 :',.::"'Old' FlbridaJDistrict .... .'. : '," ',,' , , " ' "'" " ',' ~ ," .' ,,'" ,~, 4' ' <-. ," ,," " 'v', ~ ,~ ./ -,'"<- ^ ^, ~ ^~ '; :;,.. - ~ ,......<<: ~.... ~,,, ~' /- ... " Fourth " .Neighborhood Planning"Meeting " , ~ v ^ 'h~ X~, ~, '7,w">^ , ~, \ '. , '*, , ~~ 01 A, / ", ",&c , , " ,. , , = 9June 8, 2005 7 :00 P.M. ' " , ' ," ,., ': " ' ,Clearwater, Florid~" f"; -' ^ :{< h, :' o~., , <' ~> ' _ , ,eft ~, ~ l.. , , ,~<~/ , , ,;'>;<..-.41 <<~ ,~ ; , ~ , ,~ ~Old Florida Basemaps~ · On April 6, 14 maps of growth management possibilities were created based on group partici- pation of 8 groups. · Participants applied dots to the 14 maps to select the options they desired on April 20. These selections resulted in the 6 highest-ranked maps. · On May 11, participants applied dots to the 6 maps relating to land uses (3 maps) and heights (3 maps) as to the option they most desired. ' '""Old Florida Basemaps'"" The May 11 meeting resulted in the selection of three plans: Use Plans #1 15 dots #2 41 dots* #3 0 dots Height Plans #1 26 dots* #2 22 dots * #3 8 dots *Selected Options · Residential over commercial on Mandalay · Parking · Do not want to see a canyon effect on streets, particularly Mandalay · Large number of comments about upgrading the development in the area · Large number of comments about height in general · Heights expressed should be FEMA heights · Complete comments on myclearwater.com Addressing of Comments · Residential over commercial on Mandalay · Changed the configuration of parking north of the City park · New streetscape designs will address the canyon effect on streets, particularly Mandalay · Upgrade of the development in the area will occur as new projects are approved · Large number of comments about height in general so two options were selected, not one · Heights expressed are FEMA heights I i ! t ~I U n III I III I ,.. " " .I I~ ~ z ~ o fO ! , z ~ i " , ~ " "' :~ ,^' < ;: !; }; " " " " ! l" , :; ;. Ie ; z ~ 5 i:i :I: ~ ~ "" I I i t I I \> i! ~ ~ g ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J; ~ ~ ~ F 5 ~ e b ~ ~ '" ~ 2 I I I ~ I I ~ Ii I I t r ~ ~ ... I~ ~ z ~ o 5 Q :I: , ~ i IS g ~ ~ '!; B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t. ~ t ~ i. Residences of Meeting Participants May 11, 2005 Old Florida District 13 Area North of Old Florida 26 Island Estates 7 Area South of Old Florida 2 Remainder of Clearwater 5 Pinellas County Outside Clearwater 3 Comparison of Residences for Last Three Meetings AREA 4/6 4/20 SIll Old Florida District 34 24 13 Area North of Old Florida 41 23 26 Island Estates 9 5 7 Area South of Old Florida 9 8 2 Remainder of Clearwater 9 4 5 Pinellas Co.Outside Clearwater 3 6 3 U.S. Outside of Florida 2 Outside U.S. 1 TOTAL 108 70 56 Based on the voting and comments of the last meeting, the next presentation will show refined maps and drawings that illustrate features such as: · streetscapes, · heights, and · building mass. Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: ~ u 7 JUNE 2005 OLD FLORIDA DISlRI... Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, June 09, 2005 10.16 AM 'adelgado@tampatrib.com' Per Previous E-Mail 1 AERIAL VIEW LOOKING NORTH INFORMATION DEVELOPED DURING THE PUBLIC MEETING PROCESS INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND IS INCLUDED IN THIS PRESENTATION: · ALL MULTI-FAMILY BASED ON 30 UNITS PER ACRE. · ALL OVERNIGHT ACCOMODA TIONS BASED ON 40 UNITS PER ACRE. · MULTI-FAMILY AND OVERNIGHT ACCOMODATIONS ARE PERMITTED IN ALL AREAS. · NO BUILDING STEPBACKS OCCUR UNTIL 35' ABOVE FEMA HEIGHT. · COMMERCIAL IS ONLY PERMITTED ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND IS ILLUSTRATED UP TO 20 FEET IN HEIGHT. ZONING USE OPTIONS sm 1WI . l1SU OP7lOll It ~ ~'1"__ - e........ -.....~- --. -- rJ- _.=.~ I~:.l I <<tilfNl'ltI"..... ....li'WIo...... A HEIGH1, O~TION #~ (6Q'-50,'-35') ~, ~ ' ~, , ~>;.~' 'I' j, , " '~l ~< , ~ ~ '> " ~ ,- " , ' ~,,< "..:< ~ ,"" ~ x.:...'" "/"7 \\-/~ .i 'sm:'UHl,~~t:01"ttl).. ?:~ ,<~ ~ " ' " ~,:~':I ':Cf~_ao.f , .12J 'xr M"~J' '_ ,'v v i:piJ~:~~}7"#JW OPTION # 1 A y:;;", N <J~><I ; < ,< < .<< " '" ~ ? ~ ~:, ~ y t r:: ' .1 ^, , ~" )< ,: I f, 1 , v- X lh ~: ~ ~" i , l' ~ ,r ',,~ '''''~ -~ hi / '5'; ~ , ;l,j-, ~< s:m: PUIt - IIPGfIT O!'l'1ON ~ ' ' : a, , , f1NQ~lCiW \t1 ; w 1 " e:1:~ 'y ."""'~"llI1lolff , <' "Y ,,~ HEIGHT (50'-75') ) - J ,- OPTION #2 v' ~/ y"" ~< ~~' ~^0;'v" . " J: - , ' " , m'UN-ti~:~n'_~, r i.... M."tnW U ,<' ;,; , ,_ I, ':" -' ,-< ,.' A '^ v ? b:d Mff JtlW JtCQ:~'(IlU74f1.i" Ga.P q~....r " '" ~ -< ~,,- l '" I> .... A II HEIGHT (60'-50'-35') <.., ,,<<>>n-"',>': > <'M...z.J#:- k y-' , > ~'f !W,t ~"" I' ~ l;'3 > ':~y ~ '9 ",.." I, c, '" " " ~L th 1 t / i , , I '" 4' ': , {, fc,~' ,'d"' > ) ..:J '~ ~ C ':,Z ~ i~' " ,(!) Z ,,0, ,<( ':1: " ..... W o Jon (!) Z ,;- '~, o '0 , .....;;.J " ~ t li r' / ^ , 7, w-, .../ I,' " " '/ ' <0 <~ '" \. ~ 1,J' ,,' " ,( ": , ' ~ , '( " I " ,^' ... /,,1::"1' "l l' I' 4" .) 3 DIMENSIONAL MASSING PLAN ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ w^ ~ t t , ' 'Y'r \0< , ' f," j~ ,,^ <), < ~pf, " 't f'';. v {"" ^' ~, " \ ^,./ " ~ ' ,1 , {, ), , s." " ' ,4,' , , " ' ,"'"" >>~ , ' " , ' , , " ,,' '1\....." ~}'d : ,,'~" , \,-'1"/ 'j " .hi ) " J)y " j, ~ " , , 'j " " j Y '\ 0, ;" " 'J, 'j 'j "Wi I Jo ""1< Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, June 09,200510:12 AM 'adelgado@tampatrib.com' Old Florida Meeting - 6/8/05 Angela, Gina Clayton said that you requested copies of the PowerPoint presentations given at the meeting last night by Graham Design Associates. I tried sending them both to you earlier this morning, but the system couldn't handle it and they never made it to you. I'm going to send each of them to you separately and hope that works. If they are returned to me again, I'll give you a call and see what else we can work out. Thank you for your interest in the Old Florida project. Let me know if you need anything else besides the presentations. sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 ;'r~ 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:53 AM 'adelgado@tampatrib.com' Old Florida District Meeting - 6/8/05 Angela, Gina Clayton said that you requested the two PowerPoint presentations that were given by Graham Design Associates last night at the meeting. Attached are the two presentations. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks for your interest in the project. ~ ~ left 7 JUNE 2005 7 JUNE 2005 OLD OLD FLORIDA D... FLORIDA DISTRI... sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 #\ OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH HEIGHT OPTION #1 (50' & 75') 'I w . , . " ' ~ "" "I> ~ ~ I " " ~ l , , "1 ' , i },y, , f ,'A'" , I' ~, 1 , - , , j , ,', sm: 'L~" ,- JWGHT ~~~ 'fI;:,;;;W~~, ~ ' - v 1 ", - " 11]" < ^\ NIllt:lC " ,'" " '[Ij: - i - _ _ _ ",,'<c.c'-"""'~teJt.W , '::tilt "" ~"'-<" d ~ ~ y~,~~:,,\, _" " . W.~t4Ut >'''~ v~, -" -;<<"' ,~ ......~y'V.iV,,!('" ::.t " ( " ~~~_ ~~=~~ N ~~~~~H~w,.~_V'<_"~ _.....'" SAY ESPLANADE OPTIONS IUiJl.ft t I , i ! I I I I i -l!!!L ltIID'OHlnQiPf'_ ~ ,.-... !lAYE~ 0!l00N 11 ......, ......t -l!!!L lOCtJl,'Gf\CM!Iiml<<,fttNCf -- ~ !lAY ESl\ANADE (P1l(lN #2 SIDEYARD SETBACKS @ 75' o ih ,... o I it) ,... ~ -0 15'..(1' SIDEYARD SETBACK 75' HEIGHT o . it) r-- o I ib ,... 9 -0 10'.0' S1DEYARD SETBACK 75' HEIGHT SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 35' 15'.0' SIDEYARD SETBACK ~ i o ~ , ! .. . I - . . I , , f~+l. b i 'Q IS.(}' IlS.(}' .Yl',o' o , U') C") C:;> it> Cf:> 35' HEIGHT b , to C") 1(y.(}' SIDEYAAD SETPACK ! I I i i C:;> it> C") Q :0 'Q 35' HEIGHT PLANS & ISOMETRICS 60' SITE LAYOUT b ..... ..... <<1 60 !a g ..... BAY ESPlANADE BUilDING ISOMETRIC srrE lOCftJlON: EAST Of BAY ESPl.ANAOE SJTE MEA: +/.13,200 SflO.30 AcnE UNITS: MtlI1IFAMlV 12 ONfTS +/- 1350 SF TO 3000 SF <:MRNlGHT (HOTEl) 9 tlNJTS +1- 2000 Sf TO 3000 SF SET BACK 15' PWS l' fOR EVERY 2' VERT. EAST OF BAY ESPLANADE - 751 SI1E lOCAT EAST OF BAY ESf>l.AN.AOlE SI1E MEA +/-13,200 Sf /0.30 ACRE UNITS: MUlJIFAMlV 9 UNlTS +/. 1350 SF OvmNlGHT{HOTEl) 12UNlTS =/.900SF SET BACK 15' EAST OF BAY ESPlANADE - 351 POINSETTIA AVENUE o ;;, ,... 2 2 I ! lOO~ NORTH ON POINSE1!rA AVE 115' BUllDINGSETBACKj 10.c- I I I I I b . Lo " ~ J6I. Nm1li POlNSElTIAAVENUE OPTION II 1 lOOKING NORlH ON POINSETTA AVE 115' BUILDING SETBACKt I I , I b . , ~ I ic.vA +i< +1- ~ J6I. ~ POINSETI1AAVENUE OPTION #2 SIDEYARD SETBACKS @ 75' o . ib ,.... o . ib ...... o . it> ,.... o rn ,.... 9 '" CO) ~ 10'-cr SlDEYARD SElBACK 7fi HEIGHT SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 60' i:? ~ o ~ (;> b ..0 15'.()" SIDEYARD SElBACK 60' HEIGHI' q :0 o is ..0 9 b ..0 10'.0" SIDEYAAD SETPACK 60' HEIGHT SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 50' g. o . o 10 15'.0" SIDEYAAD SETBACK 50' HEIGHT o , o 10 ~ ::0 10-0" SIDEYAAD SETMCK 50 HEIGHT PLANS & ISOMETRICS ~III &IIoY01l' IIA.CfiG I':D.EIRC ....TMf ~:U) _1_ r._ lIiIlNS+i_1iU._ f~1fJ.F''Dzm- fIII_IfIll_mv IIIllti1l'laINlWl1\111l. MANDALAYTO POINSEmA>> 751 fl. ur;_.. _n<_loW,ua.s!l\1o IItlU.1U .....USIlsIi14uCln -, ~u COIII_ -- w_ JU:t.mlJimll 4lBll.1O $It __"...a_Clllt. 11I_"'__1'_ MANDAlAY TO POINSETrIA>> 601 MANDALAY AVENUE MJlNOAIAY 1OO&N; 00ID':1 VRlH 10' SO&'IIt.~ 9 it) ... raM +1- m. ~ ~~#l ~ SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 75' b -cO " b . to " ~ b , to " b . ib " 9 ~ 10'.0' SDEYARD SETB.ACK 75' HEIGHT SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 60' o ~ 9 oQ o 6 ..0 10'.0' SIDEYAAD SETBACK 6(J HEIGHT GLENDALE GLENDAlE OPTION #3 o -' o -0 GlENDAl.E OPTION #2 PLANS & ISOMETRICS S'llE lAYOUT ! w u. &UWNG lSOMEmlC SITE lDCAllON: 1ANO AREA UNITS: MlJl1lFAMlY OValNlGHr(HOlEl) COMMERCIAl. SET 8A.CK ~ WEST OF MANDAl.AY +1-19.694 SQ. FTJO.45Aa<ES 12 \1NlTS +1- 2100 SF 16tJNJTS +1-l500SF 1.970 Sf 15' PUJS l' FOR EVERV 2' VERt SITE lDCAllON: weST OF M.ANOALAY lAND AREA +/-19.694 SFIO.45 ACRES lN1TS: MJlllfAMn.v 12 UNt1S + I. 2000 SF TO 3800 SF OVERNlGHT{H01B..) 16 UNJTS +1- 1500 SF TO 2400 Sf COMMEROAl l,970SFTO 20' SET 8A.CK 15' PWS l' fOR evmv 2' VERT. WEST OF MANDAtAY 50' WEST OF MANDALAY 60' ~:~ " ,.~,.~';~. ' ~'"'''''' .~.,~ <~ LOOKING SOUTH DOWN MANDALAY OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH AERIAL VIEW LOOKING NORTH INFORMATION DEVELOPED DURING THE PUBLIC MEETING PROCESS INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND IS INCLUDED IN THIS PRESENTATION: · ALL MULTI-FAMILY BASED ON 30 UNITS PER ACRE. · ALL OVERNIGHT ACCOMODATIONS BASED ON 40 UNITS PER ACRE. · MULTI-FAMILY AND OVERNIGHT ACCOMODATIONS ARE PERMIlTED IN ALL AREAS. · NO BUILDING STEPBACKS OCCUR UNTIL 35' ABOVE FEMA HEIGHT. · COMMERCIAL IS ONLY PERMIlTED ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND IS ILLUSTRATED UP TO 20 FEET IN HEIGHT. , , ZONING USE OPTIONS S1tl fUN . ilKS OmoN It ~ b9 .................... El!J -- a........ '*'ftoCIMat'!tt:ltmll_ --. , --~ - ~n _.~.._._.. I~~ ~ ' eBl:EI ~~=- ~=:~..... HEIGHT OPTION #2 (60'-50'-35') " ;. (11 ~; ~ , , j , < /.' -, ; <~ , l ~ < \ ' ; " < ' I j " ' n ,I ~ ' <~ , >- -, $tI'l:PlAM -tWGI:'1,01't1O,1.I ~ eb , , "'r: ""-'0_ , " , , ' ~L",,,-':"-_ : . !tS':?J '>', , : II WN"~~ ~~~ "~I ~ ~ ~b:) ,."rl'l....,"tlG>..~~ H2 QU''l_lllPJIKT "'FflI" ~.~ ,^<>>=:>=<:o"""".-w=<<-, V"_'~M~~~ y'-~ '" ""__'N~ ~~_~^""w.,.,-,-, { ~ ~ ~ , >..,~ A ^ ", ;f< "', '" V ,~"., _< ~-",>>>,"_,.p OPTION # 1 :i;,: , ' I t. . If' , . f AA" L > 'I . " 'i ~ ~ -( ", - ': " . '; A' i, >' 1 ;~~) '~ ~ r : . i 'i :! \.d -, r $Ill' 'PUll - HlIGflTOl'TlON It ~ -' ..,......1Otd' , ~ ~ . ,- . "..~~ 'S:~... 'TI.-llol..\lf~UV1'i:lH#1 ....... .................. h <U'fA..~r::::rt<<- ~ ", , . . ~~~~ ~~<<~~"'= ,,~ " HEIGHT (50'-75') -~1- !':, , ' , , i", it ' 1r. r' r' "I ; , E: ~'j iL " - , ' l 1 \ ; t "! - '" - , , " ~J . , - i ' l , , .- i, t ;~ J,~ ; OPTION #2 ". " " -. - $f11!1'~" # HIiOlfTOf't'lON "l . ,eb- is"' .........*""w i2J ,,- ~ _>4I'~.'W"tCI.... 11 --~,~-- , HEIGHT (60'-50'-35') '" ~,'" -',"" ;;, ;..., ~ " ;." , 1( , , ,h lOOKING SOUTH AlONG MANDALAY ;"! '" " " ,<, 3 DIMENSIONAL MASSING PLAN ~ - - %' ~'" ~ :< - ""~ ~ ^ > h^ 7 t t <., "'" , .,.' ,. -^ ~ , " y , /, ~ , ~ , , , ' , , ARCHITECTS. PLAN RS SINCE 1981 AA C000752 iI' " , , " . ~ ~ ~ Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2.06 PM 'Jim Graham' RE: uses option #2.pdf Importance: High Jim, FYI, this one didn't work either. It didn't even come through as a pdf file. Like, is this map jinxed or not! I'm just going to go ahead and use the use option #2 from the last meeting and state that you'll be introducing another one with a few embellishments. Could you bring along a second copy of a CD tonight with your presentation on it, including this elusive map, so I can have it in our files. Thanks. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Graham [mailto:jimgda@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, June DB, 2005 1:56 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: uses option #2.pdf 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Wednesday, June 08,200512:32 PM 'jlmgda@tampabay.rr com' Photos Jim, attached are the photos that were in the file. I assume some of them are the ones you want. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GrandBellagioBayw CommodoresRet.jp condocomplex1.jpg GrandBellagloBayw GrandBellagioBayw GrandBellagloBayw GrandBellagioBayw atch4.jpg 9 atch.jpg atchO.jpg atch1.jpg atch2.jpg ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GrandBellagioBayw GrandBellagioBayw Gulfside_townhome Ocean_ReeC060 1. Regatta_0601.jpg Brightwater Sanibel condo.jpg atch3.jpg atch5.jpg s_beach.jpg jpg 116,JPG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Tropic_Isle_0601.jp Brightwater GulfvlewS_514,JPG Brightwater Bnghtwater Mandalay Brightwater 145.jpg 9 125,JPG 130.JPG 140,JPG 501.BelleHarbor,JPC: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Brightwater Brightwater 181.jpg Somerset 14.jpg Bnghtwater 200.jpgMandalay 501c,JPG GulfvlewS_700.JPG Mandalay 447.JPG 200b.jpg ~ ~ ~ Mandalay 501b,JPG Mandalay 483,JPG Mandalay 501a,JPG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Bayway 620,JPG Bayway-656,JPG Bayway _674,JPG Bayway-692.JPG Bayway_850,JPG sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:06 PM L1auget, John RE: Old Florida Meeting Tonight Thanks, John. No, it will be like the same setup as the Old Florida meeting on May 11 with the chairs laid out in rows facing the front of the room. We'll need the round table in the room near the door, with one oblong table at the front (for our PowerPoint equipment) and four oblong tables along the side for displays. We'll also need two oblong tables outside in the hall so that people can sign in. I'll bring a cordless mike and I'll be there around 5:00. The meeting itself will start at 7:00. Let me know if you need anything else from me. Thanks again for your help! sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: L1auget, John Sent: Wednesday, June OS, 2005 11:23 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Flonda Meeting TOnight We'll do It just like last time, but not to be confused with the meeting we had here with all of the council members present and I believe leading discussion, right? Will you bring the cordless mic and what time will you be arriving? John L1auget -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, June OS, 2005 9:45 AM To: L1auget, John Subject: Old Flonda Meeting TOnight Hi John, There will be another Old Florida meeting tonight - the last one. Anyway, I'd appreciate it if you could set up for the meeting tonight as you did it for the last meeting in May. Thanks so much. If you have any questions, please don't heSitate to let me know. sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:30 AM To: L1auget, John Cc: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Yes, all went well. Taking over will be Sharen Jarzen (copied on this emall).I.lIlet her know about the room layout sketch. Thanks KW -----Original Message----- From: L1auget, John Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:18 AM To: Wleleckl, Karl 1 Subject: RE: Old Floflua meeting tomorrow Hope all went well last night. With you leaving soon, if that IS before our next or last meeting, who will be taking your place In regards to communicating with us, set up and table and chair layout, etc etc? john -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wteleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:26 PM To: L1auget, John Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow That is meant to Illustrate a row of chairs (with the lines behind it signifying the other rows). Sorry, should've been clearer. So 5 rows of 20 chairs each, with the first row maybe 30' from the West wall. KW -----anginal Message----- From: L1auget, John Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:20 PM To: Wleleckl, Karl Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Okay, chairs for the audience facing the west wall, which has 3 tables up against it. What is the diagram showing in between the audience and the wall. Looks like head tables totaling 1471? Please clarrfy. john -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wieleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:49 AM To: L1auget, John Subject: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow John, We are having our third meeting tomorrow night. We'll be using the microphone again, so pis have the equipment turned on. I will fax a room layout showing chairs/tables. Thanks Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727 -562-4553 kar/. wielecki@myclearwater.com 2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11 :59 AM 'Jim Graham' RE: Old Fla Importance: High Jim, hey, it worked, and I now have a map. Unfortunately, it arrived upside down! I can rotate it, but the rotated map won't save, so I can't put it in the PowerPoint. Can you send me a copy as soon as possible that's right-side up. Thanks!!!!! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Graham [mailto:jimgda@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, June DB, 2005 11:39 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Fla Sharen This .pdf file should work for you. Jim 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jim Graham Uimgda@tampabay.rr.com] Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11 :39 AM Jarzen, Sharen Old Fla m Flle0042.pdf Sharen This .pdf file should work for you. Jim 1 ~~ SITE PLAN .. USB OPTION #2 - ~ _n4-.rAlfD__ _~JlIlHJ ~ _Ol.lll lIST 'lOOlIllIfAII./ 0flI1(l _ ADlDIlflW _. _..._ _~JlIlHJl l'WIJ( SITE PLAN - USES 0f'l10N ff2 OLD FLORIDA f)1S1'JlJCT cr.URWATER 8(A(H - """1iii':'F't.Oill&- I. I GRAHAM DE GN ASSOCIATES, P.A. ARCHlTl!:~EA" ----... -~~~ ~l-.,!"~~>l.... Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: L1auget, John Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11'23 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida Meeting Tonrght We'll do it Just like last time, but not to be confused with the meeting we had here with all of the council members present and I believe leading discussion, rrght? Will you bring the cordless mlc and what time will you be arrrving? John L1auget -----Onginal Messagenm From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:45 AM To: L1auget, John Subject: Old Flonda Meeting Tonight HI John, There Will be another Old Florida meeting tonight - the last one Anyway, I'd appreciate it If you could set up for the meetrng tonrght as you did it for the last meeting in May. Thanks so much' If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to let me know sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----anginal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:30 AM To: L1auget, John Cc: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Yes, all went well Takrng over will be Sharen Jarzen (copied on this email).l.lIlet her know about the room layout sketch Thanks KW -----anginal Message----- From: L1auget, John Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:18 AM To: Wleleckl, Karl Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Hope all went well last night. With you leavrng soon, If that IS before our next or last meeting, who Will be taking your place in regards to communrcating with us, set up and table and chair layout, etc etc? John -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:26 PM To: L1auget, John Subject: RE: Old Florida meeting tomorrow That is meant to illustrate a row of chairs (with the lines behind It signifying the other rows). Sorry, should've been clearer So 5 rows of 20 chairs each, with the first row maybe 30' from the West wall KW -----anginal Message----- From: L1auget, John 1 Sent: To: Subject: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:20 PM Wleleckl, Karl RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Okay, chairs for the audience facing the west wall, which has 3 tables up against it. What IS the diagram showing in between the audience and the wall Looks like head tables totaling 14??? Please clarify. John nmOnglnal Messagenm From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:49 AM To: L1auget, John Subject: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow John, We are having our third meeting tomorrow night We'll be uSing the microphone again, so pis have the equipment turned on. I will fax a room layout showing chairs/tables. Thanks Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727 -562-4553 karl. wieleck/@myclearwater.com 2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Wednesday, June 08,200510:05 AM 'Jim Graham' RE Old Florida Jim, the file that is attached does not appear to be a pdf file. Would you please check on it and resend as soon as possible. Thanks! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Graham [mailto:jimgda@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, June DB, 2005 9:29 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Florida Sharen Attached is the pdf file for the Option #2 Uses. Latter this AM we will be sending our Power Point Presentation to be added to yours. We plan on having two viewers set up one that will attached to to tail end of your presentation and a second that will show items side by side. Thanks again Jim G. 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9.45 AM L1auget, John Old Florida Meeting TOnight Hi John, There will be another Old Florida meeting tOnight - the last one. Anyway, I'd appreciate it if you could set up for the meeting tOnight as you did It for the last meeting in May. Thanks so much. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to let me know. sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Ongrnal Messagenm From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:30 AM To: L1auget, John Cc: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Yes, all went well. Taking over will be Sharen Jarzen (copied on this email).I.lIlet her know about the room layout sketch Thanks KW --mOnglnal Messagemu From: L1auget, John Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:18 AM To: Wleleckl, Karl Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Hope all went well last night With you leaving soon, if that is before our next or last meeting, who will be taking your place In regards to communicating with us, set up and table and chair layout, etc etc? john -----Ongrnal Message----- From: Wielecki, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:26 PM To: L1auget, John Subject: RE: Old Florida meeting tomorrow That IS meant to illustrate a row of chairs (with the lines behind it signifying the other rows) Sorry, should've been clearer. So 5 rows of 20 chairs each, with the first row maybe 30' from the West wall KW , -----Original Messagemn From: L1auget, John Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:20 PM To: Wieleckl, Karl Subject: RE: Old Florida meeting tomorrow Okay, chairs for the audience facing the west wall, which has 3 tables up against it. What is the diagram showing In between the audience and the wall. Looks like head tables totaling 14?71 Please clarify. john m--Onglnal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl 1 Sent: To: Subject: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:49 AM Uauget, John Old Flonda meeting tomorrow John, We are having our third meeting tomorrow nrght. We'll be using the microphone again, so pis have the equipment turned on. I will fax a room layout showing chairs/tables Thanks Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727-562-4553 karl. wieleck/@myclearwater.com 2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, June 07, 20054:37 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE. Old Flonda I would be good if you use the correct version of the map. I'm sure you'll be able to insert tomorrow. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 4:33 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Importance: High Gina, I have finished the Old Flonda presentation Jim is still out and I stili do not have the newer land use map. However, I can go with what I have and he can present the newer version in hiS presentation If need be Sharon has set it up with you for 10 AM to see the presentation in 213 tomorrow. In the event you want to see the presentation beforehand, a copy IS In your mailbox by Sharon's office I'll go ahead and burn the CD now. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, June 07, 20054:16 PM Clayton, Gina Accepted: Meeting with Sharen J for Old FL presentation 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, June 07, 20052'51 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Flonda Meeting okay - let me know if you need assistance of any kind. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, June 07,20051:45 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Flonda Meeting I've got most of the PowerPolnt done I was hoping to have It done by this afternoon so I could show it to you However, if I can't, Will have it in the morning. Hopefully It Will be this afternoon, as I hate to have things go until the last minute. I stili have not received the reVised land use map from Jim (Option #2). I've requested It by today, and he's out of the office now, so will keep on it. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:09 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Flonda Meeting Hey Sharen - how goes the agenda and Power Point for tomorrow's meeting? Let me know If you need any help. Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 , , 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1 50 PM 'jimgda@tampabay.rr.com' 'graham81@tampabay rr com' FW Old Florida Project Importance: High Jim, In relation to the message below, If height options #1 and #2 were changed (although I don't think they were), I'll also need them Thanks By the way Terry, I see why you didn't receive the first message, I typed an "h" Instead of an "r" in the e-mail address Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, June 07,200511:50 AM To: 'Jlmgda@tampabay.rr.com' Cc: 'ghaham81@tampabay.rr.com' Subject: Old Flonda Project Jim, I was getting my PowerPolnt presentation ready for tomorrow and am checking to see If the map is ready, as I would like to put It In my presentation. I'm only talking about the map you have updated with the red/blue stnpes, Ie, Use Option #2. If you could get it over to me today, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks for your helpl , As to the Computer Cord Caper (is thiS a mystery story or what, as In what happened to the laptop connector?), I wanted to let you know that we didn't completely neglect It, as I did return your call the same day, only you were out. In case you didn't get the message, guess it confused things even more. ph well, all's well that ends well - glad you found it. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 I :1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:45 PM Clayton, Gina RE' Old Florida Meeting I've got most of the PowerPoint done I was hoping to have It done by this afternoon so I could show it to you However, If I can't, will have It In the morning Hopefully It will be this afternoon, as I hate to have things go until the last minute I stili have not received the reVised land use map from Jim (Option #2) I've requested It by today, and he's out of the office now, so Will keep on It. . Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, June 07,2005 1:09 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Flonda Meeting Hey Sharen - how goes the agenda and Power POint for tqmorrow's meeting? Let me know if you need any help. Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina. c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 :1 " Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, June 07,2005 12:25 PM Jarzen, Sharen FW Old Flonda Dlstnct Public Me~tlngs FYI - sorry I forgot to copy you on this -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, June 07,200512:24 PM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Old Flonda Dlstnct Public Meetings the last meeting is tomorrow evening and the meetings have been listed on the City'S webslte and we have Issued press releases with those dates -----Onglnal Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:23 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Old Flonda Dlstnct Public Meetings Do you have a list? Are these being advertised? -----Original Message----- From: Diana, Sue Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:15 PM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Old Flonda Dlstnct Public Meetings No list has been provided to me. Check w Gina -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:05 AM To: Diana, Sue Subject: Old Flonda Distnct Public Meetings Importance: High Could I get the schedule and location for the remainin.g public meetings being held by Planning on the Old Flonda Distnct changes? Thanks. . I :1 I Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11 :50 AM 'Jimgda@tampabay.rr.com' 'ghaham81@tampabay.rr.com' Old Florida Project Jim, I was getting my PowerPoint presentation ready for tomorrow and am checking to see if the map is ready, as I would like to put It in my presentation. I'm only talking about the map.you have updated with the red/blue stripes, ie, Use Option #2. If you could get it over to me today, I'd really appreciate It Thanks for your help' I As to the Computer Cord Caper (is this a mystery story or what, as in what happened to the laptop connector?), I wanted to let you know that we didn't completely neglect it, as I did return your call the same day, only you were out. In case you didn't get the message, guess it confused things even more. Oh well, all's well that ends well - glad you found It Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 ~ Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, May 31,2005250 PM Clayton, Gina Old Florida and EAR Importance: High Gina, just to let you know that I talked to Jim Graham and it's a "go" for tomorrow at 1 :30 for Old Florida Also, I have a list of contacts for the EAR citizens' group whenever you want to go over It. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Wednesday, May 18, 2005 5 15 PM Jarzen, Sharen Wleleckl, Karl , RE: Update on Old Flonda ProJec~ , Please make sure your name appears as the contact instead of Karl's please. Thanks. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 12:04 PM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Wleleckl, Karl Subject: Update on Old Flonda ProJect Gina, Karl and I met yesterday and developed a final height map based on the two that were so close in votes. We also discussed scenarios for the setback Illustrations. Karl sent the information to Jim Graham and later talked with him. Jim said he would have the materials prepared for our 1 :30 meeting this Friday, i.e , final draft use and height maps and setback illustrations. Karl also submitted the Information to IT regarding the third meeting for posting on the Web. Sharen 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wielecki, Karl Monday, May 16, 2005 2 24 PM 'jlmgda@tampabay rr.com' , Jarzen, Sharen; 'graham81@tampabay.rr.com' 4th meeting maps Jim, . Sharen and I again reviewed and discussed the 3rd meeting results I am faxing over a plan showing the heights we'd like to see on a 'consensus' plan for the 4th meeting. We went through several versions of this, trying to reconcile the top two vote-getters and adding some planning sense to get at one good height scenario that can match up with the uses plan that won the majonty of the dots (The height along the beach is 75', in case that didn't come through clearly on the fax). We'd like to see a few (3 or so) vanations on bUilding setbacks and stepbacks, along Mandalay and along Bay Esplanade. We want to somehow merge thiS heights plan with the Uses #2 plan, but to also show how, for example, residential over commercial would look along Mandalay with several different ~etback options, and how thiS would allow/disallow space for street plants and furniture, wide sidewalks (like on Mandalay S of Old Florida), etc. And then to show similar scenanos along the narrower Bay Espalanade, with overnight accom. & r;nultl-famlly uses What exact form these map(s) are to take IS up to you. show some 3D flyovers, or a section of an intersection, or a face- on view of some of these bUildings reaching the max. heights, .or a corridor view, etc. etc., as long as the graphics allow the public to see the various outcomes associated with different building setbacks/building mass. Let me know if any of thiS is unclear. Do you think some draft plans can be ready for Friday's meeting? Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727 -562-4553 karl. wielecki@myclearwater com , 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Brumback, Garry Friday, May 13, 20054:17 PM Wlelecki, Karl Jarzen, Sharen; Delk, Michael , RE: Old Florida 2nd meeting pres~ntatlon , Karl, again, thanks and good luck! Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Fnday, May 13, 2005 3:07 PM To: Brumback, Garry Cc: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Flonda 2nd meeting presentation Garry, I will be leaving the City on 5/20, and Sharen Jarzen Will be taking over this project Thus, all future Old Flonda correspondence/documents Will be coming from her KarlW. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Thursday, Apnl 21, 2005 10:23 AM To: Wleleckl, Karl Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Old Flonda 2nd meeting presentation Karl, Additionally, when we have the slides prepared with last night's info, please send me that and the future sessions too. I am suggesting that Bill send this on to the Council so they have documentation on where we have been and where we are going. Thanks again, Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wlelecki, Karl Sent: Thursday, Apnl 21, 2005 10:19 AM To: Brumback, Garry Subject: Old Florida 2nd meeting presentation Mr. Brumback, As requested, I'm attaching the Powerpoint file of:yesterday's slideshow. << File' Second meeting presentatlon.ppt >> I Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II 1 Page 1 of 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Wielecki, Karl Sent: Friday, May 13,20058:05 AM To: 'Sheila @BeachChamber' Cc: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE Old Florida Mtg Sheila, There will be an analysis of the findings of the meeting, but likely not for a few weeks (though before the 4th meeting on June 8) I Will be leaving the City next week, so you may contact Sharen Jarzen (copied) for this Information. KarlW. -----Original Message----- From: Sheila @BeachChamber [mailto:BeachChamber@knology.net] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:38 PM To: Wielecki, Karl Subject: Old Florida Mtg. Karl, Sorry to have missed the meeting. We were moving our offices that day ( stili are) and just couldn't make It! Is there a summary or report available? Sheila Cole Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce 447-7600 5/2/2006 \. Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wielecki, Karl Thursday, May 12, 2005 11.30 AM L1auget, John Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida meeting tomorrow Yes, all went well Taking over Will be Sharen Jarzen (copied on thiS emall) I'll let her know about the room layout sketch. Thanks KW --mOnglnal Message----- From: L1auget, John Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:18 AM To: Wleleckl, Karl Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Hope all went well last night. With you leaving soon, if that is before our next or last meeting, who Will be taking your place In regards to communicating with us, set up and table and chair layout, etc etc? john -----Original Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:26 PM To: L1auget, John Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow That IS meant to illustrate a row of chairs (with the lines behind It slgnlfymg the other rows). Sorry, should've been clearer So 5 rows of 20 chairs each, With the first row maybe 30' from the West wall. KW -----Onglnal Messagem-- From: L1auget, John Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:20 PM To: Wleleckl, Karl Subject: RE: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow Okay, chairs for the audience facing the west wall, which has 3 tables up against it What is the diagram ' showing in between the audience and the wall Looks like head tables totaling 14??? Please clarify. john -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:49 AM To: L1auget, John Subject: Old Flonda meeting tomorrow John, We are having our third meeting tomorrow night. We'll be using the microphone again, so pis have the equipment turned on. I Will fax a room layout shOWing chairs/tables Thanks Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Plannmg Department 727 -562-4553 karl. wielecki@myclearwater.com 1 .... Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wielecki, Karl Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:47 PM Clayton, Gina Delk, Michael; Jarzen, Sharen RE. 3rd OF meeting presentatlon- draft OK thanks. I used the white background before, but probably not a bad idea to add some color/darker background to make It stand out I will change, and add the comment about comment sheets. I'll leave the last slide as is, and can change tomorrow once we decide about a possible 5th mtg. KW -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:36 PM To: Wleleckl, Karl Cc: Delk, Michael; Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: 3rd OF meeting presentatlon- draft any idea how all of the white will appear on the wall? You might want to do dry run in conference room to make sure everything is readable. Also - need to tell folks about comments that can be written at tables I also think we may need one additional meeting Michael - if we are not going to discuss setbacks until next meeting - would it make sense to do a final wrap up meeting? If so - we shquld pick a date and announce at the meeting. Other than that - It looks good -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wieleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:01 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: 3rd OF meeting presentation- draft << File' Third meeting presentation ppt >> Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727 -562-4553 karl. wieleck/@myclearwater.com 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, May 10, 200512:38 PM Wielecki, Karl Jarzen, Sharen RE: fyi- agenda for OF mtg Need to decide about another meeting before including info at bottom of agenda. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:31 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: fyi- agenda for OF mtg << File: agenda #3.doc >> Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727 -562 -4553 karl. wleleckl@myclearwater.com 1 -- Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1236 PM Wielecki, Karl Delk, Michael, Jarzen, Sharen RE' 3rd OF meeting presentation- draft any idea how all of the white Will appear on the wall? You might want to do dry run in conference room to make sure everything IS readable. Also - need to tell folks about comments that can be written at tables. I also thmk we may need one additional meeting. Michael - if we are not gomg to discuss setbacks until next meeting - would it make sense to do a final wrap up meeting? If so - we should pick a date and announce at the meeting Other than that - it looks good. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:01 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: 3rd OF meeting presentatlon- draft << File: Third meeting presentation ppt >> Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727 -562-4553 karl. wieleck/@myclearwater.com 1 '" :... Page 1 of2 \1 \ .. Jarzen, Sharen From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, September 22,200510:12 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: FW: Old Florida District I can't remember if I sent this to you or not. For your Old Florida file. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Friday, August 26,2005 10:50 AM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Old Florida District Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Original Message----- From: Brink, Carolyn Sent: Friday, August 26,20059:21 AM To: City Council Cc: Akin, Pam; Blunt, Betty; Brumback, Garry; Goudeau, Cyndie; Harriger, Sandy; Horne, William; Irwin, Rod; Reporter Subject: FW: Old Florida District -----Original Message----- From: Jonson, William Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:03 PM To: 'ROBERT PENNOCK' Cc: Brink, Carolyn Subject: RE: Old Florida District Dear Ms. Ziola, Thank you for your thoughtful comments. I don't know what information you might have received from the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's office. If you wish to contact them they might be able to share information on the property valuation. It is my understanding that there are several factors that go into the appraisal process. Their number is 464-3207. The Planning Department's recommendation on the Old Florida District will be presented to the City Council in September. I invite you to look at their recommendation and let me know of your reaction. Bill Jonson 5/2/2006 Page 2 of2 Vice Mayor - Clearwater -----Original Message----- From: ROBERT PENNOCK [mailto:rmpennock@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 4:48 PM To: Jonson, William Subject: Old Florida District Dear City Council Member Bill Jonson, I would like to state that as an owner of property in the "Old Florida District" I was completely surprised by the enormous leap that my property taxes have just taken. Considering that the "preferred use" of my property is for single family and townhome use I would say I am being appraised at a level consistent with something completely different. Might I suggest I am being taxed at a new rate consistent with commercial or multifamily property values! I have no problem with this sort of taxation so long as my property rights are not taken away! My property is worth what is stated on my tax bill so long as I am not limited to single family or townhome use. I think that is only fair. I would like to make a couple of more comments about the use of my property in the "Old Florida District" I bought my property (685-687 Bay Esplanade) as an investment property based on the fact that when I went to the planning department and asked how many units I could put on this property I was told 4. There is no way I can put 4 units on this property without going up. The planning department knew this when they told me this. They did not tell me I could only put a single family home or townhome on this property. They knew I was looking at this property as a developable piece of property. Lastly, I attended the meetings regarding the "Old Florida District". I also attend many CDB meetings. I think if height is changed in our neighborhood we need to take a look at what is on both sides of this neighborhood - high rises to the south and residential to the north. Weare the transition area. We have 150 ft high rise towers to the south. To the north there are some residential homes that are being added onto and built that look to be around 40 feet tall or more. If this is the residential height, what should our neighborhood be at? Is 40 feet low-rise? We need to be the transition from 150 feet to 40 feet. I feel that the 75 foot scenario discussed at the meetings is an appropriate height for a transition area. Thank you for your time, Kathy Ziola 139 Bayside Dr. 727-444-4400 51212006 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Shell, Heather C. Wednesday, September 07,200510:59 AM Jarzen, Sharen; Stafford, Shawn RE: Council Meeting Tape I'm glad we could help. Heather -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, September 07,2005 10:58 AM To: Stafford, Shawn; Shell, Heather C. Subject: Council Meeting Tape Thanks so much for providing the tape for the 9/1/05 Council meeting so quickly. I really appreciate it! Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Message Page 1 of2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, August 31,200511 :18 AM To: Web Content Subject: RE: Powerpoint for Old Florida Thanks so much, Derek! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 ---nOriginal Message----- From: Web Content Sent: Wednesday, August 31,20059:14 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Web Content Subject: RE: Powerpoint for Old Florida r Hi, This is now online: http://wwwmvclearwater.com/qov/depts/plann ing/divlslons/LRplan/plans/old f1orida/ind ex.asp Thanks! Derek Ferguson Systems AnalysUWebmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL http://www.MvClearwater.com (727) 562-4667 -----Original Message---n From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:51 AM To: Ferguson, Derek Subject: RE: Powerpoint for Old Florida Derek, attached is the file. Thanks for your help! Let me know if you need anything else. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 ---nOriginal Messagenn- From: Ferguson, Derek 5/2/2006 Message 5/2/2006 Page 2 of2 Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:58 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Web Content Subject: Powerpoint for Old Florida Hi, A request you made on Friday was passed along to me about posting an Old Florida PowerPoint presentation to the Web site. It indicated that the file you wanted posted is located in the S: drive under Planning. I am unable to reach this location to retrieve the file, as I'm not part of the Planning department. Could you please e-mail me the file you want posted, or place it at F:\lnformatlon_Technology\DFerguson instead? I'll post this once I have it from you. Thanks! Derek Ferguson Systems Analyst/Webmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL http://www.MyClearwater.com (727) 562-4667 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, August 30, 2005 4.41 PM Delk, MIchael Jarzen, Sharen Old Florida Importance: High Attached please find some questions regarding the Old Florida District for City Council's consideration, as well as two referenced maps. If you need any additional information, please let me know. ~ ~ Questions to NorthsouthtransJP eastwesttranJPEG Consider for Old ... EG Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Questions to Consider for Old Florida . Do you agree that overnight accommodations and residential uses should be allowed throughout the District with mixed uses along Mandalay Avenue. . Should there be a uniform height across the Old Florida District? If not, should the following options be considered? o Should lower building heights be required along the north side of Somerset Street e.g. 35 or 40 feet in height? o Should transition areas occur in a north/south manner along lot lines or along rights-of-ways? If along rights-of-way, should there be three transitional areas: south of Royal Way/Glendale Street; between Royal Way/Glendale Street and Somerset St./; and north of Somerset Street or some other configuration (see Map 1); or o Should transitions areas occur in an east/west manner along lot lines or along rights-of-ways? If along rights-of-way, should there be four transitional areas: the area between the Gulf and Mandalay Avenue; between Poinsettia and Mandalay Avenues; between Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade; and east of Bay Esplanade or some other configuration (see Map 2)? . Given recent development trends, are you comfortable with a maximum height of 60 feet above FEMA notwithstanding architectural features and mechanical equipment. . Do you except the premise of increased setbacks or building stepbacks for structures above 35 feet in height? L_f -T ! I I !-"--; I 'j I I ILl I 1___"" _ - i r atf11?n~~'1 --=---.-- Possible North I South Transitions Map 1 o 125 250 - ..... 500 1.000 ~ Feet 'f(I 750 -1 J ) ) / L-.~,._ .,.....-, ~y.mpn~ St,i .., I 1 I J ~ul.. Possible East I West Transitions Map 2 0 125 250 .. .. 500 1,000 ~ Feet ~ 750 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Kaushal, Mona Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11.51 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida District Thanks. I have attached the slide to item #1583. Mona -----anginal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, August 30,200511:21 AM To: Kaushal, Mona Subject: Old Flonda Dlstnct Per our conversation, attached is the PowerPoint. The diagram is on slide #17. Let me know if you need anything else! << File: left 7 JUNE 2005 OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT.ppt >> Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11'21 AM Kaushal, Mona Old Florida District Per our conversation, attached IS the PowerPoint. The diagram is on slide #17. Let me know if you need anything else! ~ ~ left 7 JUNE 2005 OLD FLORIDA D... Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 <Y -: "", . ~ '\,~, '. ",.' \ ' ~' <' ~, ,', ~_> v ~ V h, : 7';" J<:~ ~ ? k, ,,#~ , , , " A ~ ~~ <<'-' 0. 4> ~>> '/i<t> , %' '0 ^<''', ,~ ~.., , "'"' {"(, .&. , ,> '~--.' ^, \;. " ~ <' ':; /-AC, ~ , A }- f ~ 'GiHiIT": 'G'TS: e+ P ,N:IN RS, . ,~ 'SINC:E,,}981 ' ',M'COOO,75,2 -< 1: > -;?' ,.# ", ' ',,^, ij~ ' , ' ~l'v; {/'- ~,,~'-{v ~ ':j~ ,,,< j ~ , ~>. :;:,. '"," ~ , ~" ",' ~ ^.} : "::: < ,,-'-'<, ^ , " '~~ y >;::. ~ :; "'" OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH HEIGHT OPTION #1 (50' & 75') \:_ t, * " , I l '< ~ ^ i ,1 ,~ (, '1 . ~ ; x ~"'l ~ x _~ ~ sin: pUN - "tWGHT Ovnf1N'At' ^:' ,,'e. .~.I;'.... x~x ~ . , ~" - v ~ lIliI""Vmmw:tmW ~ ,~~" 'X~ >. ':.'?'~..;> ~ y x,. - ~ ": ~'" ~ ,.; t ,~,. .' < ,. . ....~~"!:',~~>~ > <<: ',....,. ~ ~", 'y~ ' p t~~ SAY ESPLANADE OPTIONS Dl.\ E a>1!OO #2 SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 75' 5' ~ o . it) ,.... ,. o . it) " 15'.0" SIDEYAAD SETBACK 7& HEIGHT f S> ~ o I 10 ,.... o . it) ,.... o ~ Cj> <> 10'.(r SJDEYARD SETBACK 75'HEIGHT SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 35' 15'.0" SIDEYARD SETBACK l i ~ '0 . . i " : -- ! . . i . FEM' +/. I;.. '0 IS.()' IS~ ~Nl' o . t,() C") C;> 10 (t) 35' HEIGHT o , ro (\') 10'-<r SIDEYAAD SETBACK 1 I i . i ! b -' t,() C") ~ '<) '0 35' HEIGHT PLANS & ISOMETRICS ~ 60' SITE LAYOUT !:lJ 60 (:) .... .... BAY ESPLANADe BUilDING ISOMETRIC sITe lOC.AJ'ION: fAST or BAY ESPl..ANAOE SlTE AREA: +/.13,200 SflD.SO AcnE UNITS: MUI1IfAMllY 12 UNITS +1- 1350 SF TO 3000 SF CMRNlGHT (HOTQ.) 9 UNllS +/- 2000 Sf TO 3000 SF seT BACK 15' PWS l' FOR EVERY 2' VERT. EAST OF BAY ESPlANADE - 751 SITE lOCAl EAST Of BAY ESPlANADE SlJE ARfA +/.13,200 SF /0.30 AcnE UNlfS: MUlJlfAMllY 9 Ul\IjTS +1. 1350 Sf OVERNIGHT{liOTa.) 12 UNlTS "'" /.900 SF SET BACK 15' EAST OF BAY ESPLANADE - 351 POINSETTIA AVENUE b r;, ,... t I , LOOKiNG NORTH ON POINSEfA AVE j 15' BUILDING SETPACKI , I lOq I i ! I I I o r(, ,.... ~ ~ tKml.i POlNSBTIAAVENUE OPTION #1 LOOKING NORTH ON POINSETTA AVE t 15' BUILDING SETPACKt I I I I I .. I 0 I -' 0 I 10 I ffMA +J.. +1- m.!A'lm J.ML tKml.i POINSETTIA AVENUE OPTION #2 SIDEYARD SETBACKS @ 75' t o rO " o ~ ~ IS.(f lSoq 15'.0" SIDEYAAD SETBACK 75' HEIGHT 9 0() o ~ " o . it> " 10'..()' S1DEYARD SETBACK 75' HEIGHT SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 60' Q ' b -0 q <) " , b -0 (;> ~ 10'.0' SIDEYAAD SETPACK 60' HEIGHT SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 50' , ' O. to " " 6 to 15'.0' SIDEYAAD SETBACK 5O'HEIGHT " I o to 9 <> 10'-0" SIDEYAAD SETMCK 50' HEIGHT PLANS & ISOMETRICS 1IIlIt me lAVQIl' ew:fiG I\lCIIrElI\C ~'1M.t_ ~Il} _lIeiC SP,," llIIIlN1Hf_nUmlJ f&t~~Uf-1u'a.. __lOh"I<<CflPl ItlllllU'IaIN11fl1_ MANDALAYTO POINSEmA - 751 .10 m_.. UNUI. lUll "'111_ -fllIClCN <<MIlIIiIClI& 1W:M1_ m_ 1':u::=:nn= <UllIllJ:IU(t __ff/oaIl_IUII. IfIlU11t'C,*NlIUI_ MANDALAY TO POINSETfIA .. 60. MANDALAY AVENUE ~'fJNfit IOOKm tmrl! VIi11f 10' SOeWIiKS 9 it) .... i'eMA +1- m.. .Wi.. ~0tIf;CH#1 SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 75' o ib " o , it) " 15'..0' SIDEYAAD SETBACK 75' HEIGHT ~ '0 o . to " o . it) " ~ $1 '0 10'-0' SDEYARD SETBACK 75' HEIGHT , SIDEY ARD SETBACKS @ 60' l? :0 b . o -0 C;> ~ 15'.()' SIDEYARD SETBACK 60' HEIGH\' l? ih CO< = = 0 9 , 0 0 -0 ~ -0 .... ~ 10'.0' SIDEYAADSETBACK 6fJ HEIGHT GLENDALE <<:" o rb ,..., Wli GLENDALE OPTION #3 fiQllJ:l GLENDAlE OPTION #2 GLENDAlE OPTION # 1 PLANS & ISOMETRICS SITE 1.A~UT OOWNG iSOMElRlC SITE IDCATlON: !AND AREA UNITS: MUtTfAMll.V OVmNlGHr(HOTEl.) COMMEROAl. SET MCl< WEST Of MANOAlAY +/.19.694 SQ. fTJO.45ACRES 12 UNrrS +1. 2100 Sf 16 UNITS +1. 1600 Sf 1,970 SF 15' PlUS l' FOR EVmy 2' van SITE lOCATION: WEST OF lI.4ANDAlAV lAND AREA +1-19.694 SfIO.45 ACRES ~ITS: MUlTIFAMiLY 12 UNITS +1- 2000 SF TO 3800 SF ~NlGHT(HOTEl.J 16 UNHS +1. 1500 SF TO 2400 SF COMMEOCW. 1,970SHO 20' SET BACK 15' PWS l' fOi( EVSW 2' VERT. WEST OF MANDALAY 50' WEST OF MANDALAY 601 ,'hr:F ~ ,\ '^ $:!"",,~,:,~<:,> \< ",~lL ^' , , r ", ., ,ll"'l, " I' Srl^ (l" , j l'll) 04$">4 , t h~ .u f, "' ~~ ""<.,,: ::....., ,. ~A >~*-:~,:~ ""'.... '., '4 , lS '.{_~ LOOKING SOUTH DOWN MANDALAV OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Goudeau, Cyndie Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:01 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Flonda District Thanks a bunch! -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:56 AM To: Goudeau, Cyndre Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Old Florida Dlstnct Cyndie, Just a note to let you know that I dropped off the 10 color copies (of the diagram shown on ELMO yesterday) at your office earlier this morning. Have a good day! Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:04 AM Clayton, Gina FW: Old Flonda District Gina, FYI. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:56 AM To: Goudeau, Cyndle Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Old Flonda District Cyndie, Just a note to let you know that I dropped off the 10 color copies (of the diagram shown on ELMO yesterday) at your office earlier this morning. Have a good day! Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:48 AM Delk, Michael Clayton, Gina RE: 08/29/2005 Work Session Follow up Michael, I checked with Gina. She agreed that it was the plan that showed the 60' height. She also said that Jim Graham had done it according to the density calculations. I'll go ahead and print out ten color copies and take them to City Hall. Sharen J arzen, AICP Plannmg Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:37 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: 08/29/2005 Work Session Follow up Sharon - This is more Immediate need than questions at this point. michael -----Onglnal Message----- From: Goudeau, Cyndle Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:35 AM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Cc: Keenan, Stacy; ZltOUnl, Tnsh; Vaughan, Karen Subject: 08/29/2005 Work Session Follow up Michael - reminder - need to provide the council a copy of the diagrams you showed on the ELMO at yesterday's work session during the Old Florida discussion. As color copies will be needed, please provide 10 copies. Please provide by noon today. Cyndze 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:37 AM Kaushal, Mona RE: Old Florida district Thanks, 'Mona. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Kaushal, Mona Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:36 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Flonda district Thanks, Sharen. I have attached the PowerPoint presentation in FYI with item #1583. :Jvfona -----Original Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 29,20051:09 PM To: Kaushal, Mona Subject: RE: Old Flonda dlstnct Mona, Attached is the PowerPoint presentation. Please let me know if you need anything else. Have a good afternoon! << File: City Council Presentation - Final.ppt >> Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----anginal Message----- From: Kaushal, Mona Sent: Monday, August 29,200510:05 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Flonda dlstnct Sharen, Could you please send me an electronic copy of the Old Florida District PowerPoint presentation to be attached in FYI? I scanned the hard copy you provided us last week but it didn't turn out very clear. Thanks, Mona Kaushal 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Delk, Michael Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:37 AM Jarzen, Sharen Clayton, Gina FW: 08/29/2005 Work Session Follow up Sharon - This is more immediate need than questions at this point. michael -----Onglnal Message----- From: Goudeau, Cyndle Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:35 AM To: Delk, MIchael; Clayton, Gina Cc: Keenan, Stacy; ZltOUnl, Tnsh; Vaughan, Karen Subject: 08/29/2005 Work Session Follow up Michael - reminder - need to provide the council a copy of the diagrams you showed on the ELMO at yesterday's work session during the Old Florida discussion. As color copies will be needed, please provide 10 copies. Please provide by noon today. Cyndze 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Kaushal, Mona Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:36 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida district Thanks, Sharen. I have attached the Power Point presentation in FYI with item #1583. :M.ona -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 1:09 PM To: Kaushal, Mona Subject: RE: Old Flonda dlstnct Mona, Attached is the PowerPoint presentation. Please let me know if you need anything else. Have a good afternoon! << File: City Council Presentation - Final.ppt>> Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 - -----Onglnal Message---n From: Kaushal, Mona Sent: Monday, August 29,200510:05 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Flonda dlstnct Sharen, Could you please send me an electronic copy of the Old Florida District PowerPoint presentation to be attached in FYI? I scanned the hard copy you provided us last week but it didn't turn out very clear. Thanks, Mona Kaushal Systems Analyst Official Records and Legislative Services 562-4095 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Delk, Michael Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8'36 AM Jarzen, Sharen; Clayton, Gina RE: Old Florida That would be helpful Sharon. A couple of questions we might consider: 1. Do they want a specific formula for how setbacks/step backs work for structures over 35' in height? 2. Would they want to consider 40 feet on north side of summerset rather than 35'? (according to Garry, this is what John Doran was trying to get at) mid -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:29 AM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda I assumed from the Council Work Session yesterday that we were to generate a list of questions that the Council could use as a springboard to aid them in coming to a consensus on how they envision the further development of Old Florida. Will these be discussed at the next Council work session on September 12, or the one on October 3, or at some other time? Anyway, in order to stay ahead of the curve, do you want me to develop a list' of questions, e-mail them to you for perusal, and then arrange a time with Sharon when the three of us could meet to further discuss and begin to finalize them? Thanks. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Page 1 of 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 29,20053:11 PM To: 'Karl. Wielecki@CityofOrlando.net' Subject: RE: maps Thanks so much, Karl! If we can't find the originals, at least we have the photographs of all of them. Jim Graham is also going to look around to see if they are over there. Glad things are going well for you there. And, take heart. One can only assume that someday these high housing prices will go down! Thanks again. Have a good afternoon! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Karl. Wielecki@CityofOrlando.net [mailto: Karl. Wielecki@CityofOrlando.net] Sent: Monday, August 29,20053:02 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: maps Sharen, I don't have a strong recollection of what I did with those maps. My best memory is that I rolled them up left them somewhere near my cubicle. Jim was the one that took the photos, and I think he took photos of only 5 or 6 of the maps. I did sketch each of the group maps on 8.5x11 maps, showing the Items that were dotted with the dot counts, and those sheets should have been in the OF file I left you. Sorry, though, if if this does not totally help you. I miss that project, and wish I had seen it through to the end. And I certainly miss being that close to the beach. I do however like it here much. There is a lot of work and a lot to learn. The land dev't code is very extensive but there are many co-workers here that are qUite helpful and pleasant to work with. I'm looking for a house closer to downtown but the prices for anything decent are ridiculous. Take care and tell others I said hello. Thank you, Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner III, City of Orlando - City Planning Division 400 S. Orange Avenue Orlando, Florida 32802 ph.: 407-246-2726, fax: 407-246-2895 5/2/2006 Page 1 of 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:17 PM To: 'KarI.Wielecki@CityofOrlando.net' Subject: RE: maps Karl, Tried to call you this afternoon, but you were away from the phone - I didn't leave a message Hope all goes well for you and you're enjoying your new situation! Anyway, the reason I called is we were wondenng if you knew where the original paper maps were of the 14 scenarios that were laid out by the different groups at the beginning of the Old Florida exercise. We have the photos you took in an electronic format, but have not found the originals. Just to update you, Michael Delk presented the consensus Ideas and recommendations at the City Council work session this morning. Recommendations were: a mixed use of retail/office and residential along Mandalay; multi- family and overnight accommodations in most of the rest of the district; a maximum height of 60 feet; and increased site design performance for projects exceeding 35 feet. There was no consensus from the Council today on guidance for further development, so we'll be going back again for another session. A new Planner II was hired, Cky Ready He's very adept with GIS, so it's nice to have someone else with that skill again. We've also started our EAR process and our first Citizen Advisory Committee will be next week. Well, let us know if you know where the maps might be and how you're doing! Best Wishes, Sharen Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Karl. Wielecki@CityofOrlando.net [mailto: Karl. Wielecki@CityofOrlando.net] Sent: Monday, August 29,20059:11 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: maps Sharen- I tried leaving you a voice mail re your question about the maps, but got cut off. What are you looking for? Hopefully I can help. And how is Old FlOrida coming?? Thank you, Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner III, City of Orlando - City Planning Division 400 S. Orange Avenue Orlando, Florida 32802 ph.: 407-246-2726, fax: 407-246-2895 5/212006 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 29, 2005 1 :09 PM Kaushal, Mona RE: Old Flonda district Mona, Attached is the PowerPoint presentation. Please let me know if you need anything else. Have a good afternoon! ~ City Council Presentation - FI... Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Kaushal, Mona Sent: Monday, August 29,200510:05 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Flonda dlstnct Sharen, Could you please send me an electronic copy of the Old Florida District PowerPoint presentation to be attached in FYI? I scanned the hard copy you provided us last week but it didn't turn out very clear. Thanks, Mona Kaushal Systems Analyst Official Records and Legislative Services 562-4095 1 :10 ^11~ -Strengths -Weaknesses -Opportunities -Threats - -An effective buffer and height transition area . between the districts to the north and south - 46 -Inconsistency of City regulations -35 · Excessive mass of new buildings - 34 -Administrative/policy decisions - 31 APRIL 20 -6 highest-ranked maps selected out of initial 14 maps created MAY 11 -3 most desired options selected for land uses and heights Use Plan Options #1 15 votes #241 votes #3 0 votes Somerset St. Bay Esplanade Mandalay Ave. Public ~ Mixed Use Multi-Family & Overnight Use Option 2 Height Plan Options #1 26 votes #2 22 votes #3 8 votes Somerset St. Bay Esplanade Mandalay Ave. '$1::\ ,. Public /, ,': ': 50' building height 75' building height Height Option 1 Somerset St. ay Esplanade Mandalay Ave. lftdWIic D 35' building height 50' building height 60' building height Height Option 2 -Summary results of the first three meetings presented -Public expressed concerns related to future development -Agreement on uses -Disagreement on scale and size of development ,-- · Continue the effective buffer and height transition area in the district · Allow a wider range of uses · Mitigate the appearance of parcels being overdeveloped · Enhance site design performance, while allowing flexibility · Bring a consistency and predictability to further development · A mixed use of retail/office and residential along Mandalay Avenue · Multi-family and overnight accommodations in most of district · A maximum height of 60 feet · Increased site design performance for projects exceeding 35 feet Somerset St. Bay Esplanade Mandalay Ave. Public ~ Mixed Use Multi-Family & Overnight Use Option 2 Somerset St. Bay Esplanade Mandalay Ave. " 35' Building height " yyA> , W . 60' Building Height · 60 feet in height comparable to 1 0 projects recently approved in the district · Average height of approved projects was 56 feet I- U) ~, -.. - .. .............,.. -- :ao.... .. --0 >>: h \, '~~< ....... .,... . ........ . .. '~ s! ."\ -,-.......,...... -~_....... I- U) I-- 0::: z ~ --I z 2C 2C < ~~ /' ;,I,b ...... '* '...... .. ....... . ~ .. '...... -- -- .. -- ., " t.} ~$ J ~, , f Y ..t .........., -- - '*' ~$: <.;<<:$) <<-' '" . ~:?;:~, . . "" < I en z - 0- Z 0 :r:: l- ll::: '~ Z C) Z - ,~ 0 -I """"""" ' " ~-< """ ~. ~.~,..... .....~;.~ ....._~. ...'. w :::) z W <:( - w (/) z - o D- ~',. '''l'! _, " ~ ...!-';.;- ......~....... -..... - .~. ~., I- en I- en .W Requesting policy direction for future development in Old Florida District :10 ^ll~ Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Kaushal, Mona Monday, August 29, 2005 10:05 AM Jarzen, Sharen Old Flonda district Sharen, Could you please send me an electronic copy of the Old Florida District PowerPoint presentation to be attached in FYI? I scanned the hard copy you provided us last week but it didn't turn out very clear. Thanks, Mona Kaushal Systems Analyst Official Records and Legislative Services 562-4095 1 Page 1 of 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Karl.Wielecki@CityofOrlando.net Sent: Monday, August 29,20059:11 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: maps Sharen- I tried leaving you a voice mall re your question about the maps, but got cut off. What are you looking for? Hopefully I can help. And how is Old Florida coming?? Thank you, Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner III, City of Orlando - City Planning Division 400 S. Orange Avenue Orlando, Florida 32802 ph.: 407-246-2726, fax: 407-246-2895 5/2/2006 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Friday, August 26, 20053:17 PM 'ed@intownhomes.us' Old Florida Memo Attached is a copy of the memo that was submitted to the City Clerk's office today on the electronic system. Thanks again for your interest. Memo to Bill Horne.doc Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 u To: Bill Home From: Michael Delk, Planning Director Date: August 25, 2005 RE: Old Florida District The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a summary of the Old Florida District issues and the public input provided during a series of meetings in the area. It concludes with recommendations based on the public comments. Back2round Beach by Design (BBD), the 2001 special area plan governing development on Clearwater Beach, established eight distinct districts within Clearwater Beach to govern land use. The Old Florida District is the northern boundary of the area governed by BBD. It is comprised of 36.4 acres of land and is bounded by the Gulf of Mexico on the west, Clearwater Harbor on the east, properties fronting the north side of Somerset Street on the north and Rockaway Street on the south. The property within the Old Florida District where any future development would take place is zoned as either Medium High Density Residential or Tourist. There is currently a discrepancy between the area's zoning and land use patterns and that which was recommended for the "preferred form" development in BBD, i.e., single-family homes and townhouses with low to mid-rise buildings. Public Input Process To better understand issues in the Old Florida District, the Planning Department began a study of the character of the entire district. Four public meetings were scheduled for citizens who were interested in sharing their vision as to how they would like to see the area developed. The meetings were very well attended. The first meeting had approximately 100 attendees, while the second had about 70 in attendance, with the last two having about 60 persons. During the first meeting on April 6th, the participants were divided into small groups, each wjth a facilitator. Each group was asked to identify the strengths/weaknesses and opportunities/threats to the district. Subsequently, each group's lists were displayed on the wall and participants were invited to rank those they perceived to be the most important. Page 1 of4 The major strengths and opportunities were: Development Issues Number of Comments . Effective buffer/height transition from core beach to single-family 46 . Strong current redevelopment activity 17 Quality of Life/Social . Existing public recreational facilities 10 . Proximity and access to the beach and beach core 9 . Beautification (e.g., street trees) 6 . Affordable tourist accommodations 6 The major weaknesses and threats were: Development Issues . Inconsistency of City regulations . Excessive mass of new buildings . Administrative/policy decisions . Dilapidated buildings Number of Comments 35 34 31 10 Infrastructure/Parking/Traffic . Poor and insufficient utilities 13 . Poor roads, traffic congestion and insufficient parking 12 Tourism/Economy . . Current pace of redevelopment is escalating property taxes 11 . Loss of tourism 7 At the second public meeting on April 20th, participants were asked to determine their vision for Old Florida based on the strengths and weaknesses identified at the previous meeting. They sketched their visions on 14 blank parcel maps of the district and identified desired land uses, transition buffers, densities, heights and setbacks. At the end of the exercise, those attending assigned dots to the map features with which they most agreed. Suggestions for heights ranged from 35 feet to 120 feet, but this higher height received no support during the voting process. The highest ranked features from the maps developed were distilled into six maps - three containing land uses and three containing height preferences. These were discussed and ranked by the attendees at the third public meeting on May 11 tho Three of the maps were ultimately selected, one receiving the most votes for the uses option and two depicting height options. Two maps were selected for the height options as they both received about the same number of votes. The Uses Option #2 (attached) that was selected featured mixed use along the major portion of Mandalay Avenue with the first floor devoted to retail/office uses with residential above. All of the rest of the district not devoted to public uses or garages was shown as multi-family and overnight accommodations. This option was highly favored as it received 41 votes versus 15 Page 2 of 4 votes and zero votes for the other two options. The two options not selected both showed more of a mix of uses on particular parcels, rather than the ultimate map selected that showed these various uses collapsed into the multi-family and overnight accommodations category. The two height options selected were somewhat of a mirror image of each other. Option #1 (attached) received 26 votes and Option #2 (attached) received 22 votes, while the third option received only 8 votes. The option not selected basically showed heights of 75 feet fronting the Gulf, with the remainder of the district depicting a height of 50 feet, except along the north side of Somerset Street where the height was 35 feet. Option #1, except for the public uses, showed a height of 50 feet for the lots fronting the Gulf of Mexico and those on the north side of Somerset Street. The remainder of the area depicted a height of 75 feet, except for the public uses. The second option, except for the public uses, showed a height of 35 feet on the lots fronting Clearwater Harbor and the north side of Somerset Street, and a height of 50 feet between Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Avenue. A height of 60 feet was shown in the remainder of the district. The fourth meeting on June 8th presented the summary results of the first three meetings, as well as suggestions and discussions related to setbacks and heights. There were a number of divergent concerns expressed related to the future development of the district. There was generally no disagreement on uses, but on the scale and size of development. Plannine: Department Conclusions The Old Florida District study, which included significant public input, evaluated the purpose, use and character of development that should be allowed to occur in the District. Based on the information obtained and analysis conducted, the following conclusions have been made: . The Old Florida District should serve as an effective transitional area between the tourist area to the south and the single-family residential neighborhood to the north; . A wider range of uses should be allowed within the District; . The appearance and impacts of development should be mitigated to prevent the overdevelopment of parcels; . Site design performance should be enhanced while preserving flexibility in order to obtain quality redevelopment; and . Consistency and predictability of development should be brought to the District. \, Page 3 of 4 Plannine: Department Recommendations In order to implement the conclusions of the Old Florida District study, the Planning Department recommends the following development parameters for the Old Florida District: ' . Allowable uses should include overnight accommodations and attached dwellings throughout the district with mixed uses allowed along Mandalay Avenue; . A maximum building height of 60 feet should be allowed within the majority of the District; . A maximum building height of 35 feet should be imposed for the parcels located on the north side of Somerset Street; and . Increased site design performance should be required for projects exceeding 35 feet in height such as: - Greater building setbacks; - Building stepbacks; and - Enhanced landscaping. The proposed uses outlined above reflect the historical development patterns in the Old Florida District and recognize that the current use limitations established in BBD are not consistent with that pattern or the current zoning within the District. The proposed height provisions will ensure that an effective height transition will occur between the more intensive tourist area of Clearwater Beach to the south and the residential neighborhood to the north. Furthermore, the proposed height is generally consistent with projects already approved in the District by the Community Development Board. A total of 10 projects have been approved. Of those projects, six would be consistent with the recommended height provisions. Three projects exceed 60 feet in height and one project, while less than 60 feet in height, is located on the north side of Somerset Street and exceeds the proposed limitation of 35 feet. To ensure that the character of development in Old Florida also provides a transition between the adjacent tourist and residential areas, enhanced site design performance should be required. Attached please find a series of drawings that illustrate development concepts to achieve this increased performance. These drawings show a variety of scenarios of increased building setbacks, building setbacks and landscaping along different streets within the District that have varying rights-of-way widths. It should be noted that these concepts can be implemented and property owners can still achieve the densities allowed within the Old Florida District. The Planning Department is requesting policy direction from the City Council on these recommendations prior to developing the revisions required to BBD, the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code to implement them. cc: Gary Brumback Attachments Page 4 of4 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Kaushal, Mona Friday, August 26,200511 :34 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Item #1583 You are very welcome, Sharen. I am just doing my job. Have a good weekend! Mona -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Fnday, August 26, 2005 10:50 AM To: Goudeau, Cyndle Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Kaushal, Mona Subject: Item #1583 Cyndie, We tried both yesterday and earlier today to forward the item regarding the Old Florida District through FYI. It didn't go through for some reason. However, with Mona's help, she moved it directly from my outbox to your inbox. Let me know if you need anything further. Thanks! Also, a big thank-you again, Mona, for your help! Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:27 PM Clayton, Gina RE: Old Florida Importance: High Thanks! I have all the text done on the power point. Cky will be finishing the maps up after lunch. I'll be back about 2:30 and it should be ready for review soon after. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, August 25,200511:52 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Flonda Importance: High Attached are my revisions for the Old Florida memo. I'm sure you will need to fix bullets and bold headings, etc. Thanks for all of your hard work on this! << File: Old Florida Ideas.doc >> Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.clayton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Thursday, August 25, 2005 11 :52 AM Jarzen, Sharen Old Florida Importance: High Attached are my revIsions for the Old Florida memo. I'm sure you will need to fix bullets and bold headings, etc. Thanks for all of your hard work on this! ~ ~ Old FlOrida Ideas.doc Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.clayton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Planning Department Conclusions The Old Florida District study, which included significant public input, evaluated the purpose, use and character of development that should be allowed to occur in the District. Based on the information obtained and analysis conducted, the following conclusions have been made: . The Old Florida District should serve as an effective transitional area between the tourist area to the south and the single-family residential neighborhood to the north; . A wider ranges of uses should be allowed within the District; . The appearance and impacts of development should be mitigated to prevent the overdevelopment of parcels; . Site design performance should be enhanced while preserving flexibility in order to obtain quality redevelopment; and . Consistency and predictability of development should be brought to the District. Planning Department Recommendations: In order to implement the conclusions of the Old Florida District study, the Planning Department recommends the following development parameters for the Old Florida District: . Allowable uses should include overnight accommodations and attached dwellings through the district with mixed uses allowed along Mandalay Avenue; . A maximum building height of 60 feet should be allowed within the majority of the District; . A maximum building height of 35 feet should be imposed for the parcels located on the north side of Somerset Street; and . Increased site design performance should be required for projects exceeding 35 feet in height such as: .:. Greater building setbacks; .:. Building stepbacks; and .:. Enhanced landscaping. The proposed uses outlined above reflect the historical development patterns in the Old Florida District and recognize that the current use limitations established in Beach By Design are not consistent with that pattern or the current zoning within the District. The proposed height provisions will ensure that an effective height transition will occur between the more intensive tourist area of Clearwater Beach to the south and the District and the residential neighborhood to the north. Furthermore, the proposed height is generally consistent with projects already approved in the District by the Community Development Board. A total of 10 projects have been approved in Old Florida. Of those projects, six would be consistent with the recommended height provisions. Three projects exceed 60 feet in height and one project, while less than 60 feet in height, is located on the north side of Somerset Street and exceeds the proposed limitation of35 feet. To ensure that the character of development in Old Florida also provides a transition between the adjacent tourist and residential area, enhanced site design performance should be required. Attached please find a series of drawings that illustrate development concepts to achieve this increased performance. These drawings show a variety of scenarios of increased building setbacks, building setbacks and landscaping along different streets within the District that have varying rights-of-way widths. It should be noted that these concepts can be implemented and property owners still achieve the densities allowed within the Old Florida District. . The Planning Department is requesting policy direction from the City Council on these recommendations prior to developing the revisions required to Beach by Design, the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code to implement them. Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:27 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida I will provide edits to you. Michael will need to review everything before we get to Clerk today. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:39 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Importance: High Gina, do you have the memo to Bill Horne with the necessary changes so I can re-edit that for delivery to the City Clerk today? Thanks! Ckyand I are working on the Power Point changes. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, August 23,200510:56 AM Ready, Cky Maps Thanks! ! ~^C{^^' ^ , ob~ hi, Height Option #1 - Height Option #2 - Uses Option #2 - Final.pdf Flnal.pdf Final.pdf Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 BOAT SUPS SITE PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION #1 J \11, O_"\C.n,,, J""~."QO",OHi ,.; fl... 0.""", C.........., "'o<'\O~~u~\COlO"'H:!'lc.HT... GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIA TES P A I () <J1 I : i ~ I ~ ~-.!>. [lc~ g~~ om g5~ " . liHiII! (i 'i!ilil, I Wi:I', I!:! . ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS (121) 'n-~~oo 585 N"," 5tr~~l SUll~ 1201 Dilled", FlorId. :I~'~S FAX 1:n-~555 I SITE PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION #1 OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT CLEARWATER BEACH. FLORIDA NORTH ~ 75 -0' BUILDING HEIGHT PUBUC so -0" BUILDING HEIGHT NO DATE REVISIONS BY CK ~ ~1 " ,,~~ , ,~ ,~ "i '" ",;;~ " ,:%' ~ BOAT SUPS SITE PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION #1 NORTH ~ PUBUC Fl n'-o. BUILDING HEIGHT L:::J 50'-0' BUILDING HEIGHT 60 -lY BUIlDING HEIGHT I SITE PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION #2 OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT CLEARWATER BEACH. FLORIDA REVISIONS J \M, o..-t.\C........ J...\.Ioo"""'ws Ii ... ....... ""t.., c,.. ....... !l..."OE"C.~\COLO~'H.'UHT... GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIA TES P A I 0 10 f '! n n}; , , ~~~ O' g6~ " , 1F111"/'i 1,' 'lilt! 1.H"fib "I' I!' I ih'll! I I hi - NO DATE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS n2111:;:H~OO sss n,"" Slr~"t s~\" ~201 D""".i~ F1DMd:l :H'~S FAX 133-~5;5 C] SITE 'LAN - USES 01'J1ON n _T SI.P$ - ~ HIIll'l"'_'AIIJ)OVOI_ _lMttOHS ~ ~fIl USE (IST,&OOII UfAlV__ --..-. ___llAflOll$l PII8UC sITe PLAN. USES OPTION If2 otD nOd.. DJSl'RJCT CUARWAlVlllUCH - , '~4\ffiCffii<llQo\ -- Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: BAY ESPLANADE 35'-50'.pdf Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 22,20052'39 PM Ready, Cky Bay Esplanade 1 o I o L{) - 6'-0" FEMA +1- b I iO .- b I iO (\') WEST BAY ESPLANADE 13'-6' 13'-6' 2' 1 n PL 151-0" . li!t" f I I 1 15' 1 SETBACK LOOKING NORTH ON BAY ESPlANADE 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY fl@IC , <<" ,~~w..< ,ll~'l' ~}, ~ ',/ lA' : " 'ldh )/ ?l,;~" 'l/ ~, ,l " ql "~H~!.<~/ o I . L{) Ct') - - - - ~ r- 6'-0" FEMA +1- ll_ ,1@1 '~:[: EAST Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Delk, Michael Monday, August 22, 2005 1 :24 PM Jarzen, Sharen; Clayton, Gina FW. Old Florida FYI. mid -----Onglnal Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Monday, August 22,20051:23 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Horne, Wilham; Akin, Pam; Irwin, Rod; City Council Subject: RE: Old Flonda OK... thanks. City Council and CM - FYI Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -m-Onglnal Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, August 22,200512:58 PM To: Brumback, Garry Subject: FW: Old Flonda FYI. mid -m-Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 22,200512:11 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda FYI, All of the persons who wanted to be contacted about another public meeting on Old Florida have been notified about next week's Council Work Session. The information was also posted on the City's website this morning, Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Monday, August 22, 2005 12:23 PM Jarzen, Sharen; Delk, Michael RE: Old Florida thanks Sharen -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12: 11 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda FYI, All of the persons who wanted to be contacted about another public meeting on Old Flonda have been notified about next week's Council Work Session. The information was also posted on the City's website this morning. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 22, 2005 12:00 PM 'Ed Turanchik' RE: Old Florida District Yes, as soon as that is finalized and submitted to the City Clerk's office, I'll e-mail you a copy. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Ed Turanchik [mailto:ed@intownhomes.us] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 11:08 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Florida District Thank you. Will there be backup that is available to the public prior to that meeting? -----Original Message----- From: Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com [mailto:Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 9:49 AM To: ed@intownhomes.us Subject: Old Florida District As you expressed an interest in receiving more information about the Old Florida District, I wanted to let you know that it will be discussed at the August 29, 2005 City Council Work Session in Council Chambers at 9:00 AM. Conclusions and recommendations based on the four public meetings will be presented to the Council by the Planning Department for the Council's guidance and direction. If you desire any more information, please don't hesitate to call me at the number below, or return your inquiry via e-mail. Thank you for your interest in the Old Florida District. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 22, 2005 10:35 AM Web Content RE: Old Florida Thanks so much! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Web Content Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:25 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Ready, Cky; Web Content Subject: RE: Old Flonda Hi, This is posted: <http://www.mvclearwater.com > <http://www.mvclearwater.com/qov/depts/planninq/divisions/LRplan/plans/old florida/index.asp> Thanks! .Derek Ferguson Systems Analyst/Webmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL <http://www.MvClearwater.com > (727) 562-4667 --mOnglnal Messagem-- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 9:40 AM To: Ferguson, Derek Cc: Ready, Cky Subject: Old Flonda Derek, Cky will be talking to you about putting some information on the web about the Old Florida District. Attached is the bulk of the announcement If you need It. Thanks! << File. City Council Old Flonda Discussion,doc >> Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Web Content Monday, August 22, 2005 10:25 AM Jarzen, Sharen Ready, Cky, Web Content RE: Old Flonda Hi, This is posted: <http.//www.mvclearwater.com> . <http://www.mvclearwater.com/Qov/depts/planninQ/divisions/LRplan/plans/old florida/index. asp> Thanks! Derek Ferguson Systems Analyst/Webmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL <http.//www MvClearwater.com> (727) 562-4667 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 9:40 AM To: Ferguson, Derek Cc: Ready,Cky Subject: Old Flonda Derek, Cky will be talking to you about putting some Information on the web about the Old Florida District. Attached IS the bulk of the announcement if you need It. Thanks! << File: City Council Old Florida Dlscussion.doc >> Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 22, 2005 9:51 AM 'rmpennock@msn.com' Old Florida District As you expressed an interest in receiving more information about the Old Florida District, I wanted to let you know that it will be discussed at the August 29, 2005 City Council Work Session in Council Chambers at 9:00 AM. Conclusions and recommendations based on the four public meetings will be presented to the Council by the Planning Department for the Council's guidance and direction. If you desire any more information, please don't hesitate to call me at the number below, or return your inquiry via e-mail. Thank you for your interest in the Old Florida District. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Plannmg Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 22, 2005 9:49 AM 'ed@lntownhomes.us' Old Florida District As you expressed an interest in receiving more information about the Old Florida District, I wanted to let you know that it will be discussed at the August 29,2005 City Council Work Session in Council Chambers at 9:00 AM. Conclusions and recommendations based on the four public meetings will be presented to the Council by the Planning Department for the Council's guidance and direction. If you desire any more information, please don't hesitate to call me at the number below, or return your inquiry via e-mail. Thank you for your interest in the Old Florida District. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, August 22, 2005 9:48 AM 'fsimmons1968@msn.com' Old Florida District As you expressed an interest in receiving more information about the Old Florida District, I wanted to let you know that it will be discussed at the August 29, 2005 City Council Work Session in Council Chambers at 9:00 AM. Conclusions and recommendations based on the four public meetings will be presented to the Council by the Planning Department for the Council's guidance and direction. If you desire any more information, please don't hesitate to call me at the number below, or return your inquiry via e-mail. Thank: you for your interest in the Old Florida District. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 "", .( Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: I Brol^'n, Steven Tuesday, November 22, 2005 2,02 PM Clayton, Gina Ja en, Sharen Old Florida Latest re-write rd. #7546-06 BBD Changes by S... 1 a ORDINANCE NO. 7546-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKIrf.JG AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIC'rN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION A. THE "OLD FLORIDA" DISTRICT BY RltVISING THE USES, BUILDING HEIGHTS, STEPBACKS, SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING AND PARKING ACCESS ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION II. I FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION C. MARINA RESIDENTIAL DIST~ICT BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO A L1VE/WORK PRODUCT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . WHEREAs,lhe economic vitality of Clearwater Beach is a major contributor to the I economic health of the City overall; and I ' . WHEREAS, the public infrastructure and private improvements of Clearwater Beach are a critical part cohtributing to the economic vitality of the Beach; and WHEREAS, lUbstantial improvements and upgrades to both the public infrastructure and private impro~ements are necessary to improve the tourist appeal and citizen enjoyment of the B1ach; and WHEREAS, Ithe City of Clearwater has invested significant time and resources in studying the Old Florida District of Clearwater Beach; and WHEREAS, IBeaCh by Design, the special area plan governing Clearwater Beach, contains specific d~velopment standards and design guidelines for areas of Clearwater I . Beach that need to be Improved and/or redeveloped; and WHEREAs.6eaCh bv Desian was not clear with reQard to the "preferred uses" and was not reflective bf the existinq uses located in the Old Florida District of Clearwater Beach, and I WHEREAS, ,he City of Clearwater has the authority pursuant to Rules Governing the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended, Section 2.3.3.8.4, to adopt and enforce a specific plan for redevelopment in accordance with the Community Redev~lopment District plan category, and said Section requires that a special area plan therefore be approved by the local government; and WHEREAS, ~he proposed amendment to Beach by Design has been submitted to the Community Development Board acting as the Local Planning Authority (LPA) for the City of Clearwater; knd Ordinance No. 7546-06 f1 WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for the City of Clearwater held a duly noticed public hearihg and found that amendments to Beach by Design are consistent with the Clearwater Corrlprehensive Plan; and : WHEREAS, In (Date) and (Date) the City Council of the City of Clearwater reviewed and approved Beacrl by Design; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEArWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines,1 Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection A. The "Old Florida" District, is amended as follows: A. The "Old Florida" District The area between tcacia Street and Rockaway Street is an area of transition between resort uses in Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia. Existi~g uses are generally the same as the balance of the Beach. However, the scal'O and intensity of the area, 'Nith relativoly f-ew exceptions, is substantially less tHan comparable areas to the south. The mix of uses in this area I known as the Old Florida District primarily includes residential. overniqht accommodations and institutional uses. Given the area's location and historical development pattenns, this area should continue to be a transitional district. To that end Beach b Desil n su orts the develo ment of new overni ht accommodations and attached dwellinqs throu hout the District with limited retail/commercial develo ment frontinq Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street. It also supports the continbed use and expansion of the various institutional and public uses found throuqhout the District. To ensure that the! scale and character of development in Old Florida provides the desired transition ~etween the adiacent tourist and residential areas, enhanced site desiqn performance~ is a priority. Beach by Desiqn contemplates site desiqn for the Old Florida District thait incorporates qreater buildinq heiqhts, buildinq setbacks and/or buildinq stepbacks!, as well as enhanced landscapinq, and that supercedes any conflictinq statements in Section VII. Desiqn Guidelines. as follows: Buildinq Heiqhtsl . The tOllowinJ heiqht provisions shall apply: a. BUildir~qS located on the north side of the Somerset Street shall be permitted a maximum buildin hei ht of 35 feet. Ordinance No. 7546-06 A b. Buildimos located on the south side of Somerset Street and within 60 feet of the Isoutherly rioht-of-way line, shall be permitted a maximum buildino heioht: of 50 feet; and c. prope~y throuohout the remainder of the Old Florida District shall be . permird a maximum buildino height of 65 feet. Buildino Stepbacks:, . No stePbaCkl are reouired for buildinos UP to 35 feet in heiqht . A stepback ! n all four sides of the buildin uired for an over 35 feet In heioht. . The stepback ratio for buildinqs over 35 feet in heioht is as follows: a. For Ibts frontino streets that have a 0-45.9 feet riqht-of-way, the stepbacklheioht ratio is 1 :3 b. For IO~S frontino streets that have a 46-65.9 feet rioht-of-way, the stepbackl heioht ratio is 1 :2.5 c. For IO~S frontino streets that have a 66+ feet rioht-of-way, the stePbt.Cklheioht ratio is 1 :2 . . Decreased sitepbacklheioht ratio may be possible if the followino can be demonstrateti . a. The d1ecreased step back results in an improved site plan, landscapino areasl in excess of the minimum required and/or improved desion and I appearance. b. Additi~ stepbacks can be decreased at a rate of one half foot in stepback per one foot in additional setback on all four sides of the buildin . Buildino Setbacks . The required setbacks for buildinos of any heioht are as follows: a. Exce It for the front lot lines of ro ert alon Mandala Avenue a fifteen- foot front buildinq setback is required on all properties. Ordinance No. 7546-06 b. A side, and rear buildin setback of 10 feet is re uired on all 1'0 erties. c. A zerq-foot buildinq setback may be permitted where the buildinq heiqht does r~ot exceed 35 feet if it results in an im roved site Ian landsca in areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved desiqn and I appealrance. d. A dec~ease of 5 feet from the required buildinq setbacks is possible for buildinqs over 35 feet in heiqht, if the decreased buildinq setback results in an imrrroved site plan, landscapinq areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved desiqn and appearance and in all cases, a minim:um 5 foot unobstructed access is provided alonq the side and rear of buildinqs. c. AdditibnallY, buildinq setbacks can be decreased at a rate of one foot in setbatk er half foot in additional ste back on all four sides of the buildin Landscape Setoacks I . The required landscape setbacks are as follows: a. Exee~t for the front lot lines of property alonq Mandalay Avenue. a ten-foot landscape buffer is required alonq the street frontaqe of all properties. b. Any ule may have a zero-feet buildinq setback alonq Mandalay Avenue for 80:% of the feet alonq the buildable frontaqe line of the property. The other gO% is required to have a minimum landscaped setback of 15 feet. The 20% setback may be located in several different locations on the buildable frontaqe line of the property, rather than be placed in only one locati~n on the buildable frontaqe line of the property. ParkingNehieular ieeess I . If the lot fronts on Mandalav Avenue, parkinq access is required from a side street off Mandalay Avenue. No vehicular access is to occur from Manllay Avenue. The mix of uses in the District bvors residential more than other parts of Clearwater Beach ~md retail Lses are primarily neighborhood serving uses. Given the area's ~~~~~~a~~~ ;x~~t~~:~i~~~:~~t~~~t:g~:,~o=~~:: ~~e~~~~~~~~~i~ni~ not practical. Ne\A!' single family dwellings and tmvnhouses are the preferred f-orm of Ordinance No, 7546-06 development. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and i building height should be 1m'.. to mid rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. Lack of parking in this area may hinder revitalization of existing improveh1ents, particularly on Bay Esplanade. A shared parking strategy should be pursued i1n order to assist revitalizations efforts. *********** Section 2. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection C. "Marina Residential" District, is amende as follows: ****** In the event that lot consolidation under one owner does not occur, Beach by Design contem~~lates the City working with the District property owners to issue a request for proposal to redevelop the District in the consolidated manner identified above. If thi~ approach does not generate the desired consolidation and redevelopment, I Beach by Design calls for the City to initiate a City Marina DRI in order to facilitate development of a marina based neighborhood subject to property owner support. I If lot consolidation does not occur within the District, the maximum permitted heigHt of development east of East Shore will be restricted to two (2) stories above p1arking and between Poinsettia and East Shore could extend to four (4) stories abm~e parking. An additional story could be gained in this area if the property was ddveloped as a live/work product. ****** Section 3. Beach by Design, as amended, contains specific development standards and des1ign guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that are in addition to and supplement the Community Development Code; and I Section 4. The City Manager or designee shall forward said plan to any agency required by law or tUle to review or approve same; and I Section 5. It is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance and plan and every provision th~reof, shall be considered separable; and the invalidity of any section or provision of thi~ ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other provision of this ordinance and plar\; and I Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED OJ FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL Ordinance No. 7546-06 READING A D ADOPTED Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Approved as to forl1il: Attest: Leslie DOUgall-Side~ Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7546-06 Jarzen, Sharen From: EVE~rittl Steven Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 20058:13 AM To: Plahning Are these abbreviations acceplle to be added for the Future land Uses in Beach by Design? The abbreviations can go in the Special ZOning box. Old Flonda District- OFD Destination Resort District- DR[D Marina Residential District - MRiD Retail and Restaurant District - RD Pier 60 Distnct - P60D Small Motel District - SMD Beach Walk District - BWD Clearwater Pass District - CPD Steven 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Jarfen, Sharen Sent: Mor~day, November 21, 2005 9.01 AM To: Bro:wn, Steven Subject: Ord #7546-06 Steven, attached IS the revised Linance. The originai IS on the "s" drive. Based on the discusSIon, I had to make some other changes that were not nedessarily addressed during the meeting, as to leave It as it was did not make sense, Let me know when you want to discUss, ~ Ord. #7546-06, BBD Changes.doc... Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 ORDINANCE NO. 7546-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKlt~G AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PREL~INARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIC'rN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION A. THE "OLD FLORIDA" DISTRICT BY R~VISING THE USES, BUILDING HEIGHTS, STEPBACKS, SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING AND PARKING ACCESS ALLO'fYED IN THE DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION C. MARINA RESIDENTIAL I DIST~ICT BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO A L1VE/WORK PRODUCT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, ~he economic vitality of Clearwater Beach is a major contributor to the economic health of ,he City overall; and WHEREAS, the public infrastructure and private improvements of Clearwater Beach are a critical part c1ntributing to the economic vitality of the Beach; and WHEREAS, substantial improvements and upgrades to both the public infrastructure and private impro~ements are necessary to improve the tourist appeal and citizen enjoyment of the B~ach; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has invested significant time and resources in studying the Old FI]rida District of Clearwater Beach; and WHEREAS, Beach by Design, the special area plan governing Clearwater Beach, contains specific development standards and design guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that need to be improved and/or redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has the authority pursuant to Rules Governing the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended, Section 2.3.3.8.4, to adopt and enforce a specific plan for redevelopment in accordance with the Community Redev lopment District plan category, and said Section requires that a special area plan therefore be approved by the local government; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to Beach by Design has been submitted to the Community Del elopment Board acting as the Local Planning Authority (LPA) for the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for the City of Clearwater held a duly noticed public hearing and found that amendments to Beach by Design are consistent with the Clearwater Coni prehensive Plan; and Ordinance No. 7546-06 WHEREAS, en (Date) and (Date) the City Council of the City of Clearwater reviewed and approved Beaoh by Design; now therefore, I BE ITI ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: I Section 1. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines,1 Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection A. The "Old Florida" I District, is amende1 as follows: A. The "Old Florida" District The area between Acacia Street and Rockaway Street is an area of transition between resort uses in Cent!ral Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north ~o::~~~' thoEX:; ~:G i~:':A~OI~o t~rO:~t~G r:~iV~~O:; ~:ti:G~C~ subst3ntially less tt~3n comp3r3ble 3reas to tho south. The mix of uses in this area known as the Old Florida District primarilv includes residential. overniQht accommodations and institutional uses. Given the area's location and historical development patte~ns. this area should continue to be a transitional district. To that end. Beach bv Desi n su orts the develo ment of new overni ht accommodations and attached dwellinQs throuQhout the District with limited retail/commercial development frontinq Mandalav I Avenue between Bav Esplanade and Somerset Street. It also supports the conti~ued use and expansion of the various institutional and public uses found throu hout t e District. . A ste back iis re uired on a buildin be innin at the bottom of the fourth sto and/or at 35 feet. whichever is less. Structures with three stories or less do not require a stebback. I . The stepback or setback ratio above 35 feet and/or at the bottom of the fourth stOry. whichever is less. is as follows: a. For tts frontinQ streets that have a 0-45.9 feet riqht-of-wav. the stepback!heiQht ratio is 1 :3 b. For IO~S trontino streets that have a 46-65.9 teet right-at-way, the ste back! hei ht ratio is 1 :2.5 Ordinance No. 7546-06 c. For lo1is frontinq streets that have a 66+ feet riqht-of-way. the stepbckklheiqht ratio is 1 :2 . A decreasedlstePbaCklheiqht ratio may be possible if it can be demonstrated that the decrease!d stepback results in an improved site plan. landscapinq areas in excess of the minimum re uired and/or im roved desi n and a earance. . The minimum setbacks are as follows: a. Exce~t for the front lot lines of propertv facinQ Mandalav Avenue. a fifteerl-foot buildinq setback is required on the front and rear sides of the I prope~ b. A ten-~oot buildin setback is re uired on both sides of the ro ert . c. A decrease of five feet from the required setbacks is possible if the decrecased setback results in an improved site plan. landscapinq areas in excesl of the minimum re uired and/or im roved desi n and a earance. d. A zer(~-foot setback may be permitted where the buildinq heiqht does not exceed 35 feet It the decreased setback results in an improved site plan. lands~apinq areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved desiqr~ and appearance. e. Exce t for the front lot lines of ro ert facin Mandala Avenue or a zero-foot setback lot line. a landscape buffer width equal in feet to two- thirdslof the setback is required on all sides of the property for the lenoth of thellot except for inqress/eqress areas. . An use mal have a zero-feet setback alon Mandala Avenue for 80% of the feet alonq the buildable frontaqe line of the property. The other 20% is required to have a minimum landscaped setback of 15 feet. The 20% setback- may be located in I everal different locations on the buildable fronta e line of the property. rat er than be placed in only one location on the buildable frontaqe line of the p.rope~ . . If the lot froints on Mandalay Avenue. parkinq access is required from a side street off Mandala Avenue. No vehicular access is to occur from Mandala Avenue. . Additionally. the followinq heiqht provisions shall apply: a. BUildihqs located on the north side of the Somerset Street shall be permi:tted a maximum buildin hei ht of 35 feet. Ordinance No. 7546-06 b. Buildimos located on the south side of Somerset Street and within 60 feet of the Isoutherlv rioht-of-wav line. shall be permitted a maximum buildino heioht: of 50 feet: and c. prope~y throuQhout the remainder of the Old Florida District shall be permi11ted a maximum buildinq heioht of 65 feet. . Increased b lildin hei ht above three 3 stories can be a roved exce t on the north side of Somerset Street. if the increased heioht results in an improved site plan, landscapino areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved desion and abpearance. Tho mix of usos inl the District favors rosidonti3~~: l~~~ ~~e' P3:;~ ~ :~:a~o~ Be3ch and ret3i1 l~ses 3re prim3rily neighborhood serving us~~. Given the are3's location 3nd eXisti~9 conditions, Be3ch by Design contempl3tes the renov3tion 3nd revit31iz3tion of existing improvements 'Nith limited new construction where renov3tion is t ~QctiG3I:. t-4 rg,O ~~miIY dwt~s in~ townl~~us: :;0 ::0 J'of:rro~ for:. 01 i~~~O~~~:~ts 3~~r ~~:~ ~~:: ~~ ~ I~:e~~ :;.: ~ ~~~ ~~ ,~;~ :~~ ~o=~i~~y i~~~~:h:~,~~i~ul;r~~~f ~~k~pil~~~~e~re~ :lr:~n~~~~~t~~~~~~~ , . . *********** Section 2. each by Design: A Preliminary Design for CleatWater Beach and Design Guidelines,1 Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection C. "Marina Residential" District, is amended as follows: ****** In the event that lot consolidation under one owner does not occur, Beach by Design contem~~lates the City working with the District property owners to issue a request for proposal to redevelop the District in the consolidated manner identified above. If thit approach does not generate the desired consolidation and redevelopment, I Beach by Design calls for the City to initiate a City Marina DRI in order to facilitate development of a marina based neighborhood subject to property owner support.llf lot consolidation does not occur within the District, the maximum permitted height of development east of East Shore will be restricted to two (2) stories above pbrking and between Poinsettia and East Shore could extend to four (4) stories aboJe parking. An additional story could be gained in this 3re3 if the property 'Nas d~veloped as 3 li'lel'.vork product. ' ****** Ordinance No. 7546-06 Section 3. Beach by Design, as amended, contains specific development standards and design guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that are in addition to and supplement thei Community Development,Code; and Section 4. Tlhe City Manager or designee shall forward said plan to any agency required by law or rle to review or approve same; and Section 5. It, is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance and plan and every provision ther[leOf' shall be considered separable; and the invalidity of any section or provision of this ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other provision of this ordinance and plan;~ and I Section 6. 1 his ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING I PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL I READING AND ADOPTED Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Approved as to tOl: Leslie DOUgall-Sid~S Assistant City Attorney Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7546-06 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Importance: I Jar;ren, Sharen Fri{ay, November 18, 200512'06 PM Clayton, Gina Bro~n, Steven Ordinances #2!! Hig ORDINANCE NO. 7576-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING I AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING I ARTICLE 2, ,zONING DISTRICTS, TABLES 2-802 AND 2-803, TO AMEND USE, MAXlrII,UM HEIGHT AND MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS; AND BY AMENDI~G ARTICLE 3, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 3- 1202.D, TO f-MEND PERIMETER BUFFERS FOR THE OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT I~ BEACH BY DESIGN, WHICH ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS IN BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR I CLEARWAT R BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES, WHICH; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 7546-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING I AMENDMEt\jTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II.!FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION A. THE "OLD FLORIDA" DISTRICT Br REVISING THE USES, BUILDING HEIGHTS, STEPBACKS, SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING AND PARKING ACCESS ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION I C. MARINA ESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO A L1VEIWORK PRODUCT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: I Jar?en, Sharen FrlC,ay, November 18, 200511'55 AM Clayton, Gina Bro1wn, Steven Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 7576-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING I AMENDMEr\'TS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 2, iZONING DISTRICTS, SECTION 2-802, TO AMEND USE, MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS; AND BY AMENDING~RTICLE 3, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 3-1202.0, I TO AMEND PERIMETER BUFFERS FOR THE OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT IN I BEACH BY [PESIGN, WHICH ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS IN BEACH BY [[)ESIGN: A PRE~IMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES, WHICH; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 7546-06 AN ORDINAI'JCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING ,AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR I CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II.!FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION A. THE "OLD FLORIDA" DISTRICT B'r REVISING THE USES, BUILDING HEIGHTS, STEPBACKS, SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING AND PARKING ACCESS ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT; ~Y AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION C. MARINA ESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO A L1VE/WORK PRODUCT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen I From: Jar;~en, Sharen Sent: ThJrsday, November 17, 2005 3:57 PM To: Bro~n, Steven Subject: orrance No. 7546-06 Steven, attached IS the revised (~rdmance, Please note that I did not change the order of the building heights, as It appeared awkward to be written differently, However, please feel free to change anythmg. The original of this is on the "s" dnve, Thanks, ~iJ .,. - Ord. #7546-06, BBD Changes.doc... Sharen J arzen, AICP Plannmg Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 ORDINANCE NO. 7546-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKIf[JG AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND I DESICSN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LANDI USE, SUBSECTION A. THE "OLD FLORIDA" DISTRICT BY REVISING THE USES, BUILDING HEIGHTS, STEPBACKS, SETB~CKS, LANDSCAPING AND PARKING ACCESS ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTUIRE LAND USE, SUBSECTION C. MARINA RESIDENTIAL DIST~ICT BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO A L1VE/WORK PRODUCT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, [the economic vitality of Clearwater Beach is a major contributor to the economic health of ,he City overall; and WHEREAS, the public infrastructure and private improvements of Clearwater Beach are a critical part 1ntributing to the economic vitality of the Beach; and WHEREAS, substantial improvements and upgrades to both the public infrastructure and private impro~ements are necessary to improve the tourist appeal and citizen enjoyment of the B~ach; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has invested significant time and resources in studying the Old Florida District of Clearwater Beach; and WHEREAS, Beach by Design, the special area plan governing Clearwater Beach, contains specific d~velopment standards and design guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that need to be improved and/or redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has the authority pursuant to Rules Governing the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended, Section 2.3.3.8.4, to adopt and enforce a specific plan for redevelopment in accordance with the Community Redevelopment District plan category, and said Section requires that a special area plan therefore be approved by the local government; and WHEREAS, Ithe proposed amendment to Beach by Design has been submitted to the Community Development Board acting as the Local Planning Authority (LPA) for the City of Clearwater; tnd WHEREAS, ~he Local Planning Agency (LPA) for the City of Clearwater held a duly noticed public hearing and found that amendments to Beach by Design are consistent with the Clearwater Co~prehensive Plan; and Ordinance No, 7546-06 WHEREAS, pn (Date) and (Date) the City Council of the City of Clearwater reviewed and approved Beaoh by Design; now therefore, [ BE ITI ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: I Section 1. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines,! Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection A. The "Old Florida" District, is amended as follows: A. The "Old Florida" District The area between Acacia Street and Rockaway Street is an area of transition between resort uses in Cent~al Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia. Existi~g uses are generally tho sarno as the bal3nce of the Boach. Hmvever, the sca~e and intonsity of tho area, 't.'ith relatively fe'A' oxcoptions, is substantially loss than comparable areas to tho south. The mix of uses in this area known as the bid Florida District primarily includes residential, overnioht accommodations and institutional uses. Given the area's location and historical development patterrns, this area should continue to be a transitional district. To that end, Beach by Desi'qn supports the development of new overnioht accommodations and attached dwellinos throu hout the District with limited retail/commercial develo ment frontino Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street. It also supports the contidued use and expansion of the various institutional and public uses found throuohout thle District. To ensure that thJ scale and character of development in Old Florida provides the desired transition ~etween the adiacent tourist and residential areas, enhanced site desiqn performanc ~ is a riorit. Beach b Desi n contem lates site desi n for the Old Florida District that incor orates reater buildin setbacks and/or build in ste backs as well as enhanced landscapino, and that supercedes any conflictino statements in Section VII. DesionlGuidelines, as follows: . A ste back ib re uired on a buildin be innin at the bottom of the fourth sto Structures w th three stories or less do not re uire a ste back. I . A stOry is defined as beino 11 feet or less in heioht, and would include a stOry that may contain lParkino facilities. . Stepbacks mlay be used for amenities, such as pools, lawn furniture and exercise equipment. as Ion as these amenities are in com Iiance with the Buildin Code. However, 'in no instance may any structure encroach into a required buildino stepback. Ordinance No. 7546-06 . The stepbac ratio is as follows: a. For Ibts frontinq streets that have a 0-45.9 feet riqht-of-way, the stepback/heiqht ratio is 1 :3 I b. For lots frontinq streets that have a 46-65.9 feet riqht-of-way, the stepback/ heiqht ratio is 1 :2.5 I c. For lots frontinq streets that have a 66+ feet riqht-of-way, the stepback/heiqht ratio is 1 :2 . Decreased s~ePbaCk/heiqht ratio may be possible if the followinq can be demonstrate8. a. The dkcreased stepback results in an improved site plan, landscapinq areaslin excess of the minimum required and/or improved desiqn and I apperance. b. The decreased stepback will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land, which is desiqnated as residential. I . The required setbacks are as follows: a. Excedt for the front lot lines of property facinq Mandalay Avenue, a fifteen- foot buildinq setback is required on all sides of the property. b. Excedt for the front lot lines of property facinq Mandalay Avenue, a ten- foot landscape buffer is required on all sides of the property. c. A resi6ential use is required to have a minimum 15-foot landscaped setback alon fronta e on Mandala Avenue. d. A dec ease of 5 feet from the required setbacks is possible if the decreased setback results in an improved site plan, landscapinq areas in excess of the minimum re uired and/or im roved desi n and a earance. . A commercial use may have a zero-feet setback alonq Mandalay Avenue for 80% of the feet alonq the buildable frontaqe line of the property. The other 20% is required to have a minimum landsca ed setback of 15 feet. The 20% setback may be loca ed in several different locations on the buildable fronta e line of the property, rat I er than be placed in only one location on the buildable frontaqe line of the proper~ . If the lot frohts on Mandalay Avenue, parkinq access is required from a side street off M ndala Avenue. No vehicular access is to occur from Mandala Avenue. Ordinance No, 7546-06 . Additionally, Ithe followino heioht provisions shall apply: a. BUildh~ s located on the north side of the Somerset Street shall be permi ted a maximum buildin hei ht of 35 feet. b. Buildinos located on the south side of Somerset Street and within 60 feet of thelsoutherly rioht-of-way line, shall be permitted a maximum buildino heighl of 50 feet; and c. Propefty throuohout the remainder of the Old Florida District shall be permitted a maximum buildino heioht of 65 feet. e Increased bJilding heiQht above three (3) stories can be approved if the following can be demonstrated: a. The irlcreased heioht results in an improved site plan, landscapinq areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved desion and I appearance, or b. The i~creased heioht will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land, which is desionated as residential. The 'mix of uses in! the District favors residential more than other parts of Clearv/ater Beach and retail \~ses are primarily neighborhood serving use!:;. Given the area's location and existirrg conditions, Beach by Design contemplates the renovation and revitalization of exierting improvements with limited nev.' construction where renovation is not practic3\. Newr single f3mily dwellings ~:md townhouses are the preferred f-orm of development. DenlSities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and I building height should be 10'.\' to mid rise in accordance '1.'ith the Community Develobment Code. Lack of parking in this are3 m3Y hinder revit31ization of existing improvements, particularly on Bay Esplanade. /\ shared parking strategy should be pursued In order to assist revit31iz3tions efforts. *********** Section 2. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines,1 Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection C. "Marina Residential" District, is amendec as follows: ****** In the event that lot consolidation under one owner does not occur, Beach by Design contemrrlates the City working with the District property owners to issue a request for proposal to redevelop the District in the consolidated manner identified above. If thi~ approach does not generate the desired consolidation and Ordinance No. 7546-06 redevelopment, Beach by Design calls for the City to initiate a City Marina DRI in order to facilitate development of a marina based neighborhood subject to property owner support. Ilf lot consolidation does not occur within the District, the maximum permitted heigh~ of development east of East Shore will be restricted to two (2) stories above prrking and between Poinsettia and East Shore could extend to four (4) stories abo\lie parking. An 3ddition31 story could be gained in this area if the proporty 'A'3S do . ****** Section 3. Beach by Design, as amended, contains specific development standards and desi~gn guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that are in addition to and supplement thi Community Development Code; and Section 4. l[he City Manager or designee shall forward said plan to any agency required by law or rule to review or approve same; and Section 5. 111 is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance and plan and every provision the}eof, shall be considered separable; and the invalidity of any section or provision of this lordinance shall not affect the validity of any other provision of this ordinance and Plant and Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING I PASSED Of\' SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie DOUgall-Sidel Assistant City Attorrhey Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7546-06 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: I Brolwn, Steven Thl/rsday, November 17, 20051:55 PM Jarzen, Sharen old Florida Notes on Old lorida code amen... What do you think of the attached. 1 . The stepb. ck ratio is as follows: -For lots fronting streets that have a 0-45.9 feet right-of-way, the stepbacklheight ratio is 1:3 -For lots fronting streets that have a 46-65.9 feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1:2.5 -For lots fronting streets that have a 66+ feet right-of-way, the stepbacklheight ratio is 1 :2 - Decreased stePblcklhei t ratio ma be ossible if the followin can be demonstrated. a. The decreased stepback results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in bxcess of the minimum required and/or improved design and I @]~earance. b. Th~ decreased stepback will not reduce the vertical component of the view frdm a parcel of land, which is designated as residential. . The requJed setbacks are as follows: Except for the frobt lot lines of property facing Mandalay Avenue, a fifteen-foot building setback is requirel~ on all sides of the property. Except for the frobt lot lines of property facing Mandalay Avenue, a ten-foot landscape buffer is required Ion all sides of the property. I A residential use iis required to have a minimum 15-foot landscaped setback along frontage on Mand1alay Avenue. - A decrease of 5 ~eet from the required setbacks may be possible if the following can be demonstrated. a. The decreased setback results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in hcess ofthe minimum required and/or improved design and I mn~earance. A commercial usel may have a zero-feet setback along Mandalay Avenue for 80% ofthe feet along the builidable frontage line of the property. The other 20% is required to have a minimum landscaped setback of 15- feet. The 20% setback may be located in several different locatiom: on the buildable frontage line of the property, rather than be placed in only one location bn the buildable frontage line of the property. If the lot fronts oj Mandalay Avenue, parking access is required from a side street off Mandalay Avenmk No vehicular access is to occur from Mandalay Avenue. Page 1 of3 Jarzen, Sharen From: Jarzen, Sharen I Sent: Wednesday, November 16,200510:48 AM To: 'Suzanne Bosct\en' Subject: RE: Old FloridalDistrlct Suzanne, the only images t~at I have available are the electronic ones, We don't have the large paper ones available anymore Howevler, If you would like to discuss anything further at our office, I'd be glad to do so Please let me know If you hbve any more questions Thanks. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message~----- From: Suzanne Bos~hen [mailto:f1suzanne@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:35 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen I Subject: RE: Old Florida District ' Thanks Sharen fnr ~e materials you emailed me. They came tbm heautifully and download quickly. I am havirg trouble with seeing which streets are which as the maps are small, so I would like to come to see them closer at your convenience. Can you tell me when it would be best to come? Thanks again so ve!ry much, Suzanne Boschen I I From: <5haren.Jarzen@myClearwater.com> To: <f1suzanne@hotm~i/.com> CC: <5teven.Brown@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE' Old Floriqa District Date: Mon 14 Nov 2005 16:10:15 -0500 I Suzanne, attached are the 14 map scenarios that were originally developed Please note that all of these maps were c1onsolidated over the time period of the four meetings, and resulted In three final maps that were selected by the participants at the last meeting, Please don't heSitate to contact me If you have any questions Sharen Jarzen, A[CP Planning Departmknt City of Clearwate 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Suz9nne Boschen [mailto:flsuzanne@hotmail.com] Sent: ThurTday, November 10, 2005 10:34 PM To: Jarzen, ISharen Subject: RE: Old Florida District 5/4/2006 5/4/2006 Page 2 of3 HI Sharen, Thanks so mu(~h for your'qUlck reply. I would love J get the info in email form if possible. If it is not too much trouble to do so. Sincly, Suzanne Boscrn r From: <5haren.Jarzen@myClearwater.com> To: <flsuza'rne@hotmaiI.Com> Subject: RE;I Old Florida District Date: Wed, I Nov 200514:53:00 -0500 Yes, they are still available in an electronic format I could try to e-mail them to you If you'd like Or I could Irun paper copies and have those available, Let me know how you would like to view them, or if you need anything else Thanks. Sharen J Grzen, AICP I Planning l)epartment I City of ClEarwater 727-562r626 . -----Original Message----- FrCl!m: Suzanne Boschen [mailto:flsuzanne@hotmail.com] Sel~t: Tuesday, November 08,20059:17 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen I sur1ect: RE: Old Florida District Dea Sharen, , ' Thank you very much for the info on the meeting, though I am concerned that so close to Christmas many I peore Will be out of town. ' I haye been told that the height restriction numbers that the Mayor threw out came from the series of four meetings at the Rec Center. I was at several of those meetmgs and while I did hear numbers discussed, I do ~ot remember the numbers the City IS now considering being mentioned at all. Are the newsprint worl~sheets from those meetings still available for viewing? I am referring to the large plain newsprint I she1ts that each table drew on. If so, when and where can I or my attorney see them? Thanks again, I Suzanne Boschen ~m: <SharenJaaen@myCJealWarer.com>. . T(~: <5teven.Brown@myClearwater.com>, <ed@intownhomes.us>,<fsimmons1968@msn.com>, <david.s SllbJect: Old Florida District Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:37:07 -0500 >rhe Old FlOrida District diSCUSSion Originally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City CounCil m1eeting to discuss the Old Florida District Will be held at a later date after the CDB meeting. Please don't ~tsitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 If you have any questions. >Sharen Jarzen, AICP >Plannlng Department 5/4/2006 Page 3 of3 >pty of Clearwater > n7-562-4626 > BR> << MVC-002S- 1.JPG>> - I << MVC-008S- 2,JPG>> - I << MVC-0045- 3,JPG >> - I << MVC-013S- 4,JPG >> - I << MVC-007S- 5,JPG >> - I << MVC-012S-_6,JPG >> << MVC-0065-_7,JPG >> << MVC-003S-_8,JPGI>> << MVC-XXXX- 9,JPGi >> - I << MVC-010S- 10,JPG>> - I << MVC-006S- l1.JPG>> - I <<MVC-XXXX- 12,JPG>> - I << MVC-009S- 13,JPG>> - I << MVC-014S-_14,JPG >> Page 1 of3 Jarzen, Sharen From: Suzanne Boschbn [flsuzanne@hotmail com] Sent: Tuesday, Nove~ber 15, 20054:35 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Florida District Thanks Sharen for the materials you emailed me. They came thru beautifully and download quickly. I am having trouble with st~eing which streets are which as the maps are small, so I would like to come to see them closer at your ctnvenience. Can you tell me when it would be best to come? Thanks again so very much, Suzanne Boschen I I From: <Sharen.Jarzen@myClefrwater.com> To: <flsuzanne@hotmail.com> CC: <Steven.8roWn@mYCle~*ater.com> Subject: RE: Old Florida District Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:1t15 -0500 Suzanne, attached are thle 14 map scenarios that were onglnally developed. Please note that all of these maps were consolidated over th:e time period of the four meetings, and resulted In three final maps that were selected by the participants at the Ilast meeting. Please don't heSitate to contact me if you have any questions, Sharen Jarzen, AICP Plannmg Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Suzanne Bdschen [mailto:flsuzanne@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, Npvember 10, 2005 10:34 PM To: Jarzen, Sharenl ' Subject: RE: Old Florida District Hi Sharen, Thanks !io much for your qUick reply. I would love to get the1lnfo in email form if possible. If It IS not too much trouble to do so. Slncly, Suzanne Boschen From: <Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com> To: <flsuzanne@hOfmail.com> Subject: RE' Old Florida District Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2f05 14:53:00 -0500 Yes, they are stili available in an electronic format. I could try to e-mail them to you if you'd like Or I could run paper topies and have those available. Let me know how you would like to view them, or If , I you need anything else, Thanks. 5/4/2006 Page 20f3 Sharen Jarzen, :AICP Planning DepartTent City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: su~anne Boschen [mailto:flsuzanne@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08,20059:17 PM I To: Jarzen, Sharen I Subject: RE: Old Florida District Dear Sharen.! Thank you jry much for the Info on the meeting, though I am concerned that so close to Christmas many people will be out d town. I I have been told that the height restriction numbers that the Mayor threw out came from the series of four meetings at the Rec dnter. I was at several of those meetings and while I did hear numbers discussed, I do not remember the numbers[the City is now conSidering being mentioned at all. Are the newsprint worksheets from those meetings stili available for viewing? I am referring to the large plain newsprint sheets that each table drew on. If so, when and where can I or my attorney see them? Thanks agaJ I su:.:rhen From: <Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com> To: <5te~en.8rown@myClearwater.com>, <ed@intownhomes.us>, <fsimmons1968@msn.com>,<david.shear@ru Subject: bId Florida District Date: Moh, 7 Nov 2005 14:37:07 -0500 > The Old Florida District discussion originally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (CDS) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old I Florida District will be held at a later date after the CDS meeting. Please don't hesitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 if you have any questions. ~Sharen Jlrzen, AICP >Planning I Department >C1t)' of Clearwater > 727-562-4626 > ><< MVC-002S-_1.JPG >> ><< MVC-008S-_2,JPG >> ><< MVC-0045-_3,JPG >,> ><< MVC-013S-_ 4,JPG >'> ><< MVC-007S-_5,JPG >> ><< MVC-012S-_6,JPG >> ><< MVC-0065-_7,JPG >> 5/4/2006 Page 3 of3 ><< MVC-003S-_8JPG >> ><< MVC-XXXX-_9JPG >> ><< MVC-010S-_10JPG >> ><< MVC-006S-_11.JPG >> ><< MVC-XXXX-_12JPG >> ><< MVC-009S-_13JPG >> ><< MVC-014S-_14JPG >> 5/4/2006 Page 1 of2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, Nove91ber 14,20054:10 PM To: 'Suzanne Boschen' Cc: Brown, Steven Subject: RE: Old Florida Distnct Suzanne, attached are the 14 map scenarios that were originally developed, Please note that all of these maps were consolidated over the' time period of the four meetings, and resulted in three final maps that were selected by the participants at the la~t meeting Please don't hesitate to contact me If you have any questions, Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message--_n From: Suzanne Boschen [mailto:flsuzanne@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, Noyember 10, 2005 10:34 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old FI0rida District Hi Sharen, Thanks so muc.h for your quick reply. I would love to get"the info in email form if possible. If it is not too much trouble to do so. Sincly, Suzanne Boschen From: <5haren.Jarzen@myC/earwater.com> To: <flsuzanne@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: Old Florida District Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:53:00 -0500 Yes, they are stili available in an electrOnic format. I could try to e-mail them to you if you'd like, Or I could run paper copies and have those available Let me know how you would like to view them, or if you need anything else Thanks, Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Departme;nt City of Clearwater: 727-562-4626 -nnOriginal Message----- , From: Suzanne Boschen [mailto:flsuzanne@hotmail.com] 5/4/2006 5/4/2006 Page 2 of2 Sent: Tuesday, November 08,20059:17 PM ,I To: Jarzen, Sharen Subjec.t: RE: Old Florida District 'I Dear Sharen, Thank you very much for the Info on the meeting, though I am concerned that so close to Christmas many people will be out of town. ' II , I have been told that the height restriction numbers that the Mayor threw out came from the series of four meetings at the Rec Center, I was at several of those meetings and while I did hear numbers discussed, I do not remember the numbers the ('Ity IS now considering being mentioned at all. Are the newsprint worksheets from those meetings still available for viewing? I am referring to the large plain newsprint sheets that each table drew on. If so, when and where can I 0~1 my attorney see them? Thanks again, Suzanne Boschen From: <5haren.Jarzen@myClearwater.com> To: <Steven.Brown@myClearwater.com>, <ed@intownhomes.us>, <fsimmons1968@msn.com>,<davld.shear@rude Subject: Old Florida DIstrict Date: Mon,? Nov 2005 14:37:07 -0500 > The Old Florida District diSCUSSion originally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old Flonda District will be held at a later date after the CDB meeting. Please don't hesitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562- 4626 If you have any questions. > >Sharen Jarzen, AICP >Planning D~partment >City of Clearwater > 727-562-4626 II > Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, November 14, 2005 11 :28 AM Clayton, Gina, Brown, Steven Old Flonda Attached are the recommendations for the stepbacks, setbacks/landscaping and parking that were developed last month Please note that we used 35 feet as a gUide when stepbacks would be required, however, it is defined In term of stones of the building The changes are qUite comprehensive and also, I believe, well thought out Old Florida tepbacks, Setback.. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 DRAFT #3 October 2005 OLD FLORIDA RECOMMENDATIONS STEPBACK A stepback is required on a building beginning at the bottom of the fourth story. Structures with three stories or less do not require a stepback. A story is defined as being 11 feet or less in height, and would include a story that may contain parking facilities. Stepbacks may be used for amenities, such as pools, lawn furniture and exercise equipment, as long as these amenities are in compliance with the Building Code. However, in no instance may any structure encroach into a required building stepback. The stepback ratio is as follows: For lots fronting streets that have a 0-45.9 feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1:2. For lots fronting streets that have a 46-65.9 feet right-of-way, the stepbacklheight ratio is 1:2.5. For lots fronting streets that have a 66+ feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1 :3. SETBACKS/ LANDSCAPING Except for the front lot lines of property facing Mandalay Avenue, a IS-foot building setback is required on all sides of the property. Except for the iront lot lines of property facing Mandalay Avenue, a ten-foot landscape buffer is required on all sides of the property. A residential use is required to have a minimum IS-foot landscaped setback along frontage on Mandalay Avenue. A commercial use may have a zero-feet setback along Mandalay Avenue for 80% of the feet along the frontage line of the property. The other 20% is required to have a minimum landscaped setback of 15 feet. The 20% setback may be located in several different locations on the frontage line ofthe property, rather than be placed in only one location on the frontage line of the property. PARKING lfthe lot fronts on Mandalay Avenue, parking access is required from a side street offMandalay. No vehicular access is to occur from Mandalay Avenue. .. Page 1 of2 l~ Jarzen, Sharen From: Suzanne Boschen [flsuzanne@hotmail com] ---- Sent: Thursday, November 10,200510'34 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Florida District Hi Sharen, Thanks so much for your quick reply. I would love to get the info in email form if possible. If it is not too much trouble to do so. Sincly, Suzanne Boschen From: <5haren.Jarzen@myC/earwater.com> To: <f1suzanne@hotmaJ7.com> Subject: RE: Old Florida District Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:53:00 -0500 Yes, they are stili available in an electronic format. I could try to e-mail them to you If you'd like, Or I could run paper copies and have those available, Let me know how you would like to view them, or if you need anything else, Thanks, Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Suzanne Boschen [mailto:flsuzanne@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08,20059:17 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Florida District Dear Sharen, Thank you very much for the Info on the meeting, though I am concerned that so close to Christmas many people will be out of town. I have been told that the height restriction numbers that the Mayor threw out came from the series of four meetings at the Rec Center. I was at several of those meetings and while I did hear numbers discussed, I do not remember the numbers the City is now considering being mentioned at all. Are the newsprint worksheets from those meetings still available for viewing? I am referring to the large plain newsprint sheets that each table drew on. If so, when and where can I or my attorney see them? Thanks again, Suzanne Boschen 5/4/2006 Page 2 of2 From: <5haren.Jarzen@myC/earwater.com> To: <5teven.Blown@myC/earwater.com>, <ed@mtownhomes.us>, <fsimmons1968@msn.com>,<david.shear@ruden.com>, Subject: Old Florida District Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:37:07 -0500 > The Old Florida District discussion originally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (CD B) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the CDB meeting. Please don't hesitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 If you have any questions. > >Sharen Jarzen, AICP >Planning Department >Clty of Clearwater > 727 -562-4626 > 5/4/2006 Page 1 of2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 20052:53 PM To: 'Suzanne Boschen' Subject: RE. Old Florida District Yes, they are still available in an electronic format. I could try to e-mail them to you if you'd like, Or I could run paper copies and have those available, Let me know how you would like to view them, or if you need anything else, Thanks. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Suzanne Boschen [mailto:flsuzanne@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08,20059:17 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Florida District Dear Sharen, Thank you very much for the info on the meeting, though I am concerned that so close to Christmas many people will be out of town. I have been told that the height restriction numbers that the Mayor threw out came from the series of four meetings at the Rec Center. I was at several of those meetings and while I did hear numbers discussed, I do not remember the numbers the City is now considering being mentioned at all. Are the newsprint worksheets from those meetings still available for viewing? I am referring to the large plain newsprint sheets that each table drew on. If so, when and where can I or my attorney see them? Thanks again, Suzanne Boschen From: <5haren.Jarzen@myClearwater.com> To: <5teven.8rown@myClearwater.com>, <ed@intownhomes.us>, <fsimmons1968@msn.com>,<david.shear@ruden.com>,< Subject: Old Florida District Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:37:07 -0500 > The Old Florida Distnct discussion onginally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City CounCil meeting to diSCUSS the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the CDB meeting. Please don't hesitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 if you have any questions. > >Sharen Jarzen, AICP >Plannlng Department >City of Clearwater > 727-562-4626 5/4/2006 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Ed Turanchik [ed@intownhomes us] Wednesday, November 09,200512:43 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida District Please forward to me whatever you develop whenever you develop it. thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com [mailto:Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1:11 PM To: ed@intownhomes.us Subject: RE: Old Florida District Sure, I'll be glad to e-mail them to you as soon as they become available. Currently, we're still in the process of developing the written material. However, it will be built around the City Council directions, i.e., 35 feet in height above Somerset, 50 feet on the south side of Somerset, with 65 feet in height for the rest of the District. Uses will be basically commercial along Mandalay, with multi-family and overnight accommodations in the rest of the District. If you need any more information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Ed Turanchik [mailto:ed@intownhomes.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:11 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Florida District Can you email to me the proposed written changes for the district? Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com [mailto:Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:37 PM To: Steven.Brown@myClearwater.com; ed@intownhomes.us; fsimmonsI968@msn.com; david.shear@ruden.com; rmpennock@msn.com; flsuzanne@hotmail.com Subject: Old Florida District The Old Florida District discussion originally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (COB) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the COB meeting. Please don't hesitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 if you have any questions. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Page 1 of 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Suzanne Boschen [flsuzanne@hotmall com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08,20059:17 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE' Old Florida District Dear Sharen, Thank you very much for the info on the meeting, though I am concerned that so close to Christmas many people will be out of town. I have been told that the height restriction numbers that the Mayor threw out came from the series of four meetings at the Rec Center. I was at several of those meetings and while I did hear numbers discussed, I do not remember the numbers the City is now considering being mentioned at all. Are the newsprint worksheets from those meetings still available for viewing? I am referring to the large plain newsprint sheets that each table drew on. If so, when and where can I or my attorney see them? Thanks again, Suzanne Boschen From: <5haren.Jarzen@myClearwater.com> To: <5teven.Brown@myClearwater.com>, <ed@intownhomes.us>, <fsimmons1968@msn.com>, <david.shear@ruden.com>, <rmpenn Subject: Old Florida District Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:37:07 -0500 > The Old Florida Distnct discussion originally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meetmg has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City Council meetmg to discuss the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the CDS meeting. Please don't heSitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 if you have any questions. > >Sharen Jarzen, AICP >Plannlng Department >C1ty of Clearwater > 727-562-4626 > 5/4/2006 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1'11 PM 'Ed Turanchik' REo Old Florida Dlstnct Sure, I'll be glad to e-mail them to you as soon as they become available. Currently, we're still in the process of developing the written material. However, it will be built around the City Council directions, i.e., 35 feet in height above Somerset, 50 feet on the south side of Somerset, with 65 feet in height for the rest of the District. Uses will be basically commercial along Mandalay, with multi-family and overnight accommodations in the rest of the District. If you need any more information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Ed Turanchik [mailto:ed@intownhomes.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:11 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Old Florida District Can you email to me the proposed written changes for the district? Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com [mailto:Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:37 PM To: Steven.Brown@myClearwater.comi ed@intownhomes.usi fsimmonsI968@msn.comi david.shear@ruden.comi rmpennock@msn.comi flsuzanne@hotmail.com Subject: Old Florida District The Old Florida District discussion originally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the COB meeting. Please don't hesitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 if you have any questions. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Ed Turanchik [ed@intownhomes,us] Tuesday, November 08,2005 11'11 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE, Old Florida District Can you email to me the proposed written changes for the district? Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com [mailto:Sharen.Jarzen@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:37 PM To: Steven.Brown@myClearwater.com; ed@intownhomes.us; fsimmons1968@msn.com; david.shear@ruden.com; rmpennock@msn.com; flsuzanne@hotmail.com Subject: Old Florida District The Old Florida District discussion originally scheduled for the November 15, 2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20, 2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the CDB meeting. Please don't hesitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 if you have any questions. . Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Web Content Monday, November 07,20052'44 PM Jarzen, Sharen Web Content RE' Web Posting HI, This IS done' <http //www mvclearwater com/oov/depts/plannino/dlvlsions/LRplan/plans/old florida/Index asp> Thanks' Derek Ferguson Systems AnalysUWebmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL <http //www MvClearwater.com> (727) 562-4667 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:01 PM To: Ferguson, Derek Subject: Web Posting Derek, could you please post the announcement below on both the Intranet and Internet sites INTRANET The location path IS Planning\Long Range Planning\Old Florida District Neighborhood Meetings and Related Documents, Please place the Information about the CDB meeting above the current 8/29/05 entry Community Development Board (CDB) Old Florida District Discussion - Fall 2005 The Old Florida District discussion originally scheduled for the November 15,2005 CDB meeting has been rescheduled for December 20,2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the CDB meeting. City Council Old Florida Discussion - 8/29/05 The Old Florida District will be discussed at the August 29, 2005, etc INTERNET The location path IS, Planning\Old Florida District Neighborhood Meetings and Related Documents, Please place the information about the CDS meeting above the current 8/29/05 entry, Community Development Board (CDB) Old Florida District Discussion - Fall 2005 The Old Florida discussion originally scheduled for the November 15,2005 CDB meeting has been rescheduled for December 20,2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the CDB meeting. City Council Old Florida Discussion - 8/29/05 1 The Old Florida District will be discussed at the August 29, 2005, etc. Thanks so much for your help!! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 2 Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, November 07, 20052'37 PM Brown, Steven; Ed Turanchik (E-mail); Frank Simmons (E-mail); L. David Shear (E-mail), Robert Pennock (E-mail), Suzanne Boschen (E-mail) Old Florida District From: Sent: To: The Old Florida District discussion originally scheduled for the November 15,2005 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting has been rescheduled for December 20,2005. The City Council meeting to discuss the Old Florida District will be held at a later date after the CDB meeting. Please don't hesitate to e-mail me, or call me at 727-562-4626 if you have any questions. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Brown, Steven Monday, November 07, 2005 11'36 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Florida LUZ Thanks, that's great! Steven m--Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, November 07,2005 11:32 AM To: Brown, Steven Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Flonda LUZ I'll send the postlngs to the appropriate folks today, and contact the listing of those who wanted to be notified today also, I'll send you copies of those e-malls as I send them out, Steven, Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Brown, Steven Sent: Monday, November 07,2005 11:28 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: FW: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Flonda LUZ Please confirm with me that thiS has been handled, Thanks Steven 'W --mOnglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, November 07,200511:12 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Brown, Steven Subject: RE: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Flonda LUZ We probably should also posted that delay on our Website. Thanks --mOnginal Message-m- From: / Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, November 07,200511:11 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Brown, Steven Subject: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Flonda LUZ Sharen - if you still have the e-mail contact list for Old FlOrida - you might want to send an e-mail letting folks know that these cases will be continued and not heard at the Nov. 15th COB meeting Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, November 07,200511 32 AM Brown, Steven Clayton, Gina RE: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Florida LUZ I'll send the postings to the appropriate folks today, and contact the listing of those who wanted to be notified today also, I'll send you copies of those e-malls as I send them out, Steven Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----anginal Message----- From: Brown, Steven Sent: Monday, November 07,200511:28 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: FW:' Beach by Design Amendments/Old Florida LUZ Please confirm with me that this has been handled. Thanks Steven : {() -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, November 07,2005 11:12 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Brown, Steven Subject: RE: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Flonda LUZ We probably should also posted that delay on our Website. Thanks. ---uOnglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, November 07,200511:11 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Brown, Steven Subject: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Flonda LUZ Sharen - If you still have the e-mail contact list for Old Florida - you might want to send an e-mail letting folks know that these cases will be continued and not heard at the Nov, 15th CDB meeting. Gina L. Clayton ASSistant Planning Director City of Clearwater glna.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Monday, November 07, 2005 11,12 AM Jarzen, Sharen Brown, Steven RE: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Florida LUZ We probably should also posted that delay on our Webslte Thanks -----Onginal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, November 07,2005 11:11 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Brown, Steven Subject: Beach by Design Amendments/Old Flonda LUZ Sharen - If you still have the e-mail contact list for Old Florida - you might want to send an e-mail letting folks know that these cases will be continued and not heard at the Nov 15th COB meeting. Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Monday, November 07, 2005 11'11 AM Jarzen, Sharen Brown, Steven Beach by Design Amendments/Old Florida LUZ Sharen - if you stili have the e-mail contact list for Old FlOrida - you might want to send an e-mail letting folks know that these cases will be continued and not heard at the Nov, 15th COB meeting Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater glna.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Wednesday, November 02,20059'18 AM Clayton, Gina Brown, Steven Old Florida I talked with Robert, John and Wayne yesterday about Old Florida All agreed that the best way to proceed now was to footnote the Code and put the specifics In BBD, The second best optIon was to make Old Florida Its own district like the downtown district. However, that was considered too cumbersome and lengthy a process to tackle right now If we want to get this process expedited Another option was to put the Old Florida information in the current Code under the T district However, Robert, In particular, said that that would create more confusion rather than help matters, How do you want me to proceed? Thanks, Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Pullin, Sharon Thursday, October 27, -20053:11 PM Jarzen, Sharen Old Florida Ed Turanchlk 813/253-0050 proposed setbacks and heights Thanks, Sharon Pullin Senior Staff Assistant 727 -562-4579 Planning Department 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Thursday, October 27,200510'45 AM Jarzen, Sharen Beach by Design Amendments Sharen ~ I made some revIsions to the Old Florida ordinance while you were out I also added the amendment we discussed regarding the removing the live/work product from the Marina Residential District. It is saved on the shared drive and I've attached. I think we need to work on the Whereas clauses in the ordinance as well. I also further clarified in the LUZ ordinance titles that the property was located in the Old Florida District. Cky got all of the maps done for the clerk's office and Sherry got all of the affected owners' names and addresses. Michael has reviewed the revised text but we stili need to discuss a few aspects of It Specifically - how do we treat property that historically has been used for commercial purposes that does not have frontage on Mandalay. He and I were discussing yesterday but he had to go answer a call from the CM and we never finished, I have printed out the legal notices for your file and I will send you the electronic version from the Clerk, Lets schedule some time to discuss the actual community development code amendments These are gOing to be difficult. As we discussed before you were out, I would like to think and discuss how we make the amendments before you spend a lot of time drafting amendments, It may be useful to discuss with the development review staff to see where in the Code they think the amendments should be located e g asterisk In the use tables; uses with specific criteria only for Old Florida etc Lets discuss after you've gotten some Impact from development review (John, Wayne, Robert, etc), Thanks! ~ Revised Ord. 546-05 - BBD Cha.. Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 ORDINANCE NO. 7546-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION A. THE "OLD FLORIDA" DISTRICT BY REVISING THE USES AND BUILDING HEIGHTS ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION C. MARINA RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO A L1VE/WORK PRODUCT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the economic vitality of Clearwater Beach is a major contributor to the economic health of the City overall; and WHEREAS, the public infrastructure and private improvements of Clearwater Beach are a critical part contributing to the economic vitality of the Beach; and WHEREAS, substantial improvements and upgrades to both the public infrastructure and private improvements are necessary to improve the tourist appeal and citizen enjoyment of the Beach; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has invested significant time and resources in studying the Old Florida District of Clearwater Beach; and WHEREAS, Beach by Design, the special area plan governing Clearwater Beach, contains specific development standards and design guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that need to be improved and/or redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has the authority pursuant to Rules Governing the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended, Section 2.3.3.8.4, to adopt and enforce a specific plan for redevelopment in accordance with the Community Redevelopment District plan category, and said Section requires that a special area plan therefore be approved by the local government; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to Beach by Design has been submitted to the Community Development Board acting as the Local Planning Authority (LPA) for the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for the City of Clearwater held a duly ,noticed public hearing and found that amendments to Beach by Design are consistent with ,the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on (Date) and (Date) the City Council of the City of Clearwater reviewed I and approved Beach by Design; now therefore, Ordinance No. 7546-06 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection A. The "Old Florida" District, is amended as follows: A. The "Old Florida" District The area between Acacia Street and Rockaway Street is an area of transition between resort uses in Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia. Existing uses are generally the same as the balance of the Beach. However, the scale and intensity of the area, with relatively f-ew exceptions, is substantially less than comparable areas to the south. The mix of uses in this area known as the Old Florida District primarily includes residential. overniqht accommodations and institutional uses. Given the area's location and historical development patterns. this area should continue to be a transitional district. To that end. Beach by Desiqn supports the development of new overniqht accommodations and attached dwellinqs throuqhout the District with limited retail/commercial development alonq Mandalay Avenue (MAY NEED BROADER LANGUAGE). It also supports the continued use and expansion of the various institutional and public uses found throuqhout the District. To ensure that the scale and character of development in Old Florida provides the desired transition between the adiacent tourist and residential areas. enhanced site desiqn performance is a priority. Beach by Desiqn contemplates site desiqn that incorporates qreater buildinq setbacks and/or buildinq stepbacks. as well as enhanced landscapinq. Additionally. the followinq heiqht provisions shall apply: . Buildinqs located on the north side of the Somerset Street shall be permitted a maximum buildinQ heiqht of 35 feet. . Buildinqs located on the south side of Somerset Street and within 60 feet of the southerly riqht-of-way line. shall be permitted a maximum buildinq heiqht of 50 feet; and . Property throuqhout the remainder of the Old Florida District shall be permitted a maximum buildinq heiqht of 65 feet. The mix of uses in the District favors residenti31 more than other parts of Clear\vater Beach and retail uses are primarily neighborhood serving uses. Given the area's location and existing conditions, Beach by Design contemplates the renovation and revitalization of existing improvements with limited ne'N construction where renovation is not practical. New single family dwellings and to'.vnhouses are the preferred form of development. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and building height should be low to mid rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. Lack of parking in this area may hinder revitalization Ordinance No. 7546-06 of existing improvements, particul3rly on Bay Esplanade. /\ shared parking strategy should be pursued in order to assist revitalizations efforts. *********** Section 2. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection C. "Marina Residential" District, is amended as follows: ****** In the event that lot consolidation under one owner does not occur, Beach by Design contemplates the City working with the District property owners to issue a request for proposal to redevelop the District in the consolidated manner identified above. If this approach does not generate the desired consolidation and redevelopment, Beach by Design calls for the City to initiate a City Marina DRI in order to facilitate development of a marina based neighborhood subject to property owner support. If lot consolidation does not occur within the District, the maximum permitted height of development east of East Shore will be restricted to two (2) stories above parking and between Poinsettia and East Shore could extend to four (4) stories above parking. ,^.n additional story could be gained in this area if the property was developed as a live/work product. ****** Section 3. Beach by Design, as amended, contains specific development standards and design guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that are in addition to and supplement the Community Development Code; and Section 4. The City Manager or designee shall forward said plan to any agency required by law or rule to review or approve same; and Section 5. It is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance and plan and every provision thereof, shall be considered separable; and the invalidity of any section or provision of this ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other provision of this ordinance and plan; and Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Ordinance No. 7546-06 Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7546-06 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1 :26 PM Jarzen, Sharen FW: Old Florida We will proceed with the two agenda Items based on the regular schedule outlined below. We need to move on the actual code amendments and try to get on the Dec, CDB If possible, Thanks. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 19,20051:24 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Old Flonda Normal process should be ok here, Would be nice to be done this year but we can probably wait if that is less onerous from a timing standpoint. mid -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 12:02 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Old Flonda Did you want to fast track the amendments to beach by design and the land use plan amendment and rezoning or can we take the normal timeframe? Fast Track Schedule - Nov. CDB; 1 st reading; Dec. 1 st; 2nd reading Dec. 15th Regular Schedule; - Nov. CDB; 1 st reading Dec. 15th; 2nd reading Jan. 17th Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater g ina.c1ayton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 " Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Friday, October 14,20055:38 PM Clayton, Gina Delk, Michael; Ready, Cky Ordinances for Old Florida Gina, attached are the three revised ordinances for Old Florida. They can also be found on the S drive at CDB/BEACH ISSUES/OLD FLORIDA STUDY/Final Materials/Old Florida Changes/Ordinance Changes. I also put some new Information on the CDB agenda, Enjoy! ~ ~ BBD Changes. doc Zomng Changes. doc Land Use Changes. doc Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 ORDINANCE NO. XXXX-OS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION A. THE "OLD FLORIDA" DISTRICT; BY REVISING THE USES AND HEIGHTS ALLOWABLE IN THE DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the economic vitality of Clearwater Beach is a major contributor to the economic health of the City overall; and WHEREAS, the public infrastructure and private improvements of Clearwater Beach are a critical part contributing to the economic vitality of the Beach; and WHEREAS, substantial improvements and upgrades to both the public infrastructure and private improvements are necessary to improve the tourist appeal and citizen enjoyment of the Beach; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has invested significant time and resources in studying the Old Florida District of Clearwater Beach; and WHEREAS, Beach by Design, the special area plan governing Clearwater Beach, contains specific development standards and design guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that need to be improved and/or redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has the authority pursuant to Rules Governing the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended, Section 2.3.3.8.4, to adopt and enforce a specific plan for redevelopment in accordance with the Community Redevelopment District plan category, and said Section requires that a special area plan therefore be approved by the local government; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to Beach by Design has been submitted to the Community Development Board acting as the Local Planning Authority (LPA) for the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for the City of Clearwater held a duly noticed public hearing and found that amendments to Beach by Design are consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on (Date) and (Date) the City Council of the City of Clearwater reviewed and approved Beach by Design; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Ordinance No. XXXX-05 Section 1. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection A. The "Old Florida" District, is amended by revising the 1 st and 2nd paragraphs on page 7 as follows: A. The "Old Florida" District The area between Acacia and Rockaway is an area of transition between resort uses in Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia. Existing uses are generally the same as the balance of the Beach. However, the scale and intensity of the area, with relatively few exceptions, is substantially less than comparable areas to the south and the intention is that the area remain at this lesser intensity. The mix of uses in the District favors residential more than other parts of Clearwater Beach tourist and overniqht accommodations as well as aM retail uses that are primarily neighborhood-serving uses. Given the area's location and existing conditions, Beach by Design contemplates the renovation and revitalization of existing improvements with limitod new construction where renovation is not practical. New single family dwellings and townhouses OverniQht accommodations and multi-family dwellinQs are allowed throuqhout the district. with retail/commercial permitted alonQ Mandalay Avenue. are the preferred form of development. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and building height should be low to mid rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. Special heiQht restrictions apply to three areas located in the District. The area located north of the centerline of Somerset Street shall not exceed 35 feet in heiQht. The area located south of the centerline of Somerset Street. measured for a distance of 60 feet south from the north property boundary. shall not exceed 50 feet in heiqht. The area measured from the southern boundary of the 60 feet demarcation line to the southernmost portion of the Old Florida District shall not exceed 65 feet in heiQht. Lack of parking in this area may hinder revitalization of existing improvements, particularly on Bay Esplanade. A shared parking strategy should be pursued in order to assist revitalizations efforts. * * * * Section 2. Beach by Design, as amended, contains specific development standards and design guidelines for areas of Clearwater Beach that are in addition to and supplement the Community Development Code; and Section 3. The City Manager or designee shall forward said plan to any agency required by law or rule to review or approve same; and Section 4. It is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance and plan and every provision thereof, shall be considered separable; and the invalidity of any section Ordinance No. XXXX-05 or provision of this ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other provision of this ordinance and plan; and Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. XXXX-05 ORDINANCE NO. XXXX-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY CONSISTING OF THE MHDR DISTRICT OF THE OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT OF THE BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES PLAN AND IS BOUNDED BY (NEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION), FROM MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO TOURIST; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows: Property See attached Exhibit A legal description (LUZ2005-XXXXX) Zoninq District From: Medium High Density Residential To: Tourist Zoninq Map See attached Exhibit B Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the approval of the land use designation set forth in Ordinance XXXX-05 by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to 9163.3189, Florida Statutes. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Ordinance No. XXXX-05 EXHIBIT A Add Legal Description of the Proposed Zoning Amendment Area of the Old Florida District (Legal description for LUZ2005-XXXXX) Ordinance No. XXXX-05 ORDINANCE NO. XXXX-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED (NEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION), FROM RESIDENTIAL HIGH TO RESORT FACILITIES HIGH; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property as follows: Property See attached Exhibit A legal description (LUZ2005-XXXXX) Future Land Use Plan Cateaorv From: Residential High To: Resort Facilities High Future Land Use Plan Map See attached Exhibit B Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to 9163.3189, Florida Statutes. The Community Development Coordinator is authorized to transmit to the Pinellas County Planning Council an application to amend the Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan Element of the City's comprehensive plan as amended by this ordinance. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Ordinance No, XXXX-05 Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. XXXX-05 EXHIBIT A Add Legal Description of the Proposed Future Land Use Plan Amendment Area of the Old Florida District (Legal description for LUZ2005-XXXXX) " Ordinance No. XXXX-05 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, October 13, 2005 1'56 PM Clayton, Gina RE: Old Florida It may be possible, but I won't have the information to you until tomorrow afternoon for review. If she can give you a few days into next week, you could assess the material and see if it's ready to go, or else if it only needs a few minor changes, you could do them. Hope this helps! Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:26 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Florida Based on yesterday's meeting, do you think it is pOSSible to have ordinance titles for the amendments to the code, the land use plan amendment and rezoning and amendments to beach by design for the Nov. COB. The agenda is due to the Clerk tomorrow. I could probably gain a little time to fine tune next week if needed. Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Thursday, October 13, 2005 1 :26 PM Jarzen, Sharen Old Flonda Based on yesterday's meeting, do you think It is possible to have ordinance titles for the amendments to the code, the land use plan amendment and rezoning and amendments to beach by desIgn for the Nov. CDB. The agenda IS due to the Clerk tomorrow. I could probably gain a little time to fine tune next week If needed Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater glna.c layton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:36 PM Tefft, Robert RE. Old Florida Thanks for your comments, Robert I really appreciate it! Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 --mOriglnal Message----- From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:32 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: Old Flonda <<File Old Florida Suggested Ideas, doc >> 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Tefft, Robert Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:32 PM Jarzen, Sharen Wells, Wayne Old Florida Old Florida uggested Ideas.do.. 1 DRAFT 10/11/05 STElPBACK A stepback is required on a building beginning at the bottom of the fourth story. Structures with three stories or less do not require a stepback. A story is defined as being 11 feet or less in height, and would include a story that may contain parking facilities. Stepbacks may be used for amenities, such as pools, lawn furniture and exercise equipment, as long as these amenities are in compliance with the Building Code. However, in no instance may any structure encroach into a required building stepback. The stepback ratio is as follows: For lots fronting streets that have a 0-45 feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1 :2. For lots fronting streets that have a 46-65 feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1 :2'i'2. For lots fronting streets that have a 66+ feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1 :3. Maybe this is being a little too lJrotective, but what if there is a prolJerty out there that abuts a right-of-way that is only 45.5 feet or 65.7 feet in width or something similar. How would the above apply to those properties... assuming that any exists or might exist. SETBACKS/ LANDSCAPING Except for the front lot lines of property facing Mandalay Avenue, a 15-foot building setback is required on all sides of the property. Except for the front lot lines of property facing Mandalay Avenue, a ten-foot landscape buffer is required on all sides of the property. A residential use is required to have a minimum 15-footfeet landscaped setback along frontage on Mandalay Avenue. A commercial use may have a zero-feet setback along Mandalay Avenue for 80% of the feet along the frontage line of the property. The other 20% is required to have a minimum landscaped setback of 15 feet. ** I think we may have missed something with regard to defining frontage. We may need to calculate frontage (at least for these purposes) as the width of the property less the required building setbacks. Otherwise the 20% setbacks will always be located at the comers of the properties, especially when the property is at an intersection. ** DRAFT 10/11/05 PARKING If the lot fronts on Mandalay Avenue, parking access is required from a side street off Mandalay. No vehicular access is to occur [rom Mandalay Avenue. Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1 :22 PM Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert Old Florida Suggested Ideas Attached is the first version of the ideas suggested for Old Florida in our meeting yesterday. Please note that a few Items are underlined. These are Items that were not really discussed at the meeting, but seemed a good idea to add to fill in some gaps. Also, I changed the r/w footage to take in the possibility that some of the r/w width is not always nght on the mark, but vanes to a certain extent. These changes attempted to take in cases where r/w is generally considered to be within the 40, 60 and 80-feet range. Well, let me know your views. Is this basically what was decided, or does something need to be changed? If you could get back to me by cob tomorrow, I'd appreciate it. Thanks again so much for your time yesterday! ~~: ~~~ -~ Old Florida ;uggested Ideas.do.. Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 DRAFT 10/11/05 STEPBACK A stepback is required on a building beginning at the bottom of the fourth story. Structures with three stories or less do not require a stepback. A story is defined as being 11 feet or less in height, and would include a story that may contain parking facilities. Stepbacks may be used for amenities, such as pools, lawn furniture and exercise equipment, as long as these amenities are in compliance with the Building Code. The stepback ratio is as follows: For lots fronting streets that have a 0-45 feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1 :2. For lots fronting streets that have a 46-65 feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1:2 Y2. For lots fronting streets that have a 66+ feet right-of-way, the stepback/height ratio is 1:3. SETBACKS/LANDSCAPING Except for the front lot lines of property facing Mandalay Avenue, a IS-foot setback is required on all sides of the property. Except for the front lot lines of property facing Mandalay Avenue, a ten-foot landscape buffer is required on all sides of the property. A residential use is required to have a minimum IS-feet landscaped setback along frontage on Mandalay A venue. A commercial use may have a zero-feet setback along Mandalay Avenue for 80% ofthe feet along the frontage line of the property. The other 20% is required to have a minimum landscaped setback of 15 feet. PARKING If the lot fronts on Mandalay Avenue, parking access is required from a side street off Mandalay. Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Monday, October 10, 2005 5:16 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:03 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater FYI, the response from DCA regarding traffic analysis. I also met with Wayne and Robert today regarding the setbacks/stepbacks. When would you like to meet again so we can proceed further on Old Florida. Thanks. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:50 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, When we review mixed-use land use designations, we look at the proportions that are laid out in the Land Development Regulations - i.e. 30% office, 30% retail, 40% residential and the maximum development potential under each type of use. This can get complicated when there are a range of percentages for each land use type. In that case, I think that as long as you have a reasonable, professionally acceptable way of figuring your maximum development potential you should be fine. If you're still unsure, you can submit your methodology to DCA before you submit your amendments, and we will do a courtesy review and let you know if we see any major problems. I've got copies of the North Redington Beach CHHA stuff for you, although I have not yeat made it to the mail room. I should make it down there sometime today or tomorrow. Erin <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 10/07/2005 04:02 PM <Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater 1 Erin, I had just a quick question about a mixed-use land use category (Resort Facilities High) that would allow a range of uses including residential, overnight accommodations and retail/commercial. Does DCA have expectations about how we determine the maximum development potential in an area like this in order to determine traffic impacts? As an example, should we base our analysis on the highest traffic generating use, or would DCA support assumptions about the likely mix of uses as a basis of analysis? Thanks for your help. Have a good weekend. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 4:59 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, We would need the same data and analysis that would be supplied when any land use change is proposed: public facilities (available potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water capacity to meet demand at maximum development potential), maintenance of the LOS for transportation, etc. Since the overlay would most likely be applied to areas that are already developed, I don't think that we would need a detailed Natural Resources assessment, and since the amendment doesn't increase residential densities, schools would not need to be addressed. Although not required and generally not an issue for tourist accomodations, it would be good for the City to indicate how they plan to coordinate with the County on hurricane evacuation times if the overlay were to be applied in the CHHA. I have an excellent example from North Redington Beach if you are interested. Let me know if you have any more questions. Erin <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 10/04/2005 04:21 PM <Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater 2 Erin, As a follow-up, my supervisor requested that I check to see what type of data and analysis you would need when the Resort Facilities Overlay was applied to a specific parcel in the future. Would this be the same type of information that we currently send you for an amendment, or would you need additional data and analysis? This is in reference to the "Recommendation" section in your "OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,AND COMMENTS REPORT" dated August 26, 2005 for CPA2004-12001. As always, thanks for your help. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us' Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Thanks for your help, Erin. I really appreciate it! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 2:08 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Re: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, The addition looks good - it's much more clear now. Let me know if you need anything else. Erin L. Dorn, Senior Planner Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Phone: (850) 922-1798 Fax: (850) 488-3309 <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 09/27/2005 11: 05 AM <erin.dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject 3 DCA 05-1 for the City vf Clearwater Erin, I just faxed you the page in the Ordinance that we will change in order to make it more clear that the Resort Facilities Overlay would be applied through a land use plan amendment. As such, we did not submit a map, as the plan classification will not be applied as an overlay to one specific area, but instead will be-applied on a case-by-case basis in eligible zoning district categories. Let me know what you think after you've had a chance to review it. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at the number shown below. Thanks for your help! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. 4 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Friday, October 07, 2005 4:09 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 4:04 PM To: Clayton~ Gina Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Thanks, Gina~ That explains it. I've already sent Erin an e-mail. Have a good weekend! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:17 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater The question is if we propose a mixed use land use category (Resort Facilities High) that allows a range of uses including residential, overnight accommodations and retail/commercial, does DCA have expectations about how we determine maximum development potential for the purposes of determining impacts e.g. should we base our analysis on the highest traffic generating use or will DCA support our assumptions about the likely mix of uses which would be more realistic. [I agree that Erin already answered the question for the RFO. You don't need to ask about HDR and Tourist because RFO is an overlay land use category that we will apply over the existing Residential High land use category (HDR would be the consistent zoning) and the Resort Facilities High is the other possible land use category (Tourist is the corresponding zoning district) addressed above. According to the information you provided below, the current RH area is only 7 acres. This is great news!! I think we will be able to process this as a small scale plan amendment! ! ! Let me know if this makes sense - I can come by and talk if you think that would be better. -----Original Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 2:09 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Importance: High Gina, the message below is for DCA. Before I send this up, I wanted to make sure this is what you want to find out. I've written it so it would apply to both HDR and Tourist. I think the response Erin gave us before answers how they would respond to a RFO request. I want to do this in writing, rather than a phone call, so we have something more concrete. Let me know what you think. Thanks. 1 Erin, another quick question on how DCA would view the change of land use of an area 7.94 acres in size. The area is composed of about 45 small parcels and every parcel has been developed. The area is on the beach and is currently characterized with overnight accommodation or multi-family uses. It abuts an area of 31.5 acres that is tourist with mixed uses, such as retail and commercial, as well as overnight accommodations, multi- family and governmental uses. Any amendment would recognize an existing land use in the area. What would you require from a traffic standpoint, if this area were to be changed to a higher density residential or to tourist. Would you still only require, for traffic purposes, the same information you mentioned below, i.e. maintenance of the LOS for transportation. Thanks for your help. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:48 AM To: 'Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us' Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Erin, thank you so much for your quick response. I appreciate it. I am interested in seeing the example from North Redingon Beach. If it's not in a format to be e-mailed, I'd appreciate it if you could send it to me at: Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Thanks! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 4:59 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, We would need the same data and analysis that would be supplied when any land use change is proposed: public facilities (available potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water capacity to meet demand at maximum development potential), maintenance of the LOS for transportation, etc. Since the overlay would most likely be applied to areas that are already developed, I don't think that we would need a detailed Natural Resources assessment, and since the amendment doesn't increase residential densities, schools would not need to be addressed. Although not required and generally not an issue for tourist accommodations, it would be good for the City to indicate how they plan to coordinate with the County on hurricane evacuation times if the overlay were to be applied in the CHHA. I have an excellent example from North Redington Beach if you are interested. Let me 2 know if you have any more questions. Erin <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 10/04/2005 04:21 PM <Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Erin, As a follow-up, my supervisor requested that I check to see what type of data and analysis you would need when the Reso~t Facilities Overlay was applied to a specific parcel in the future. Would this be the same type of information that we currently send you for an amendment, or would you need additional data and analysis? This is in reference to the "Recommendation" section in your "OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,AND COMMENTS REPORT" dated August 26, 2005 for CPA2004-12001. As always, thanks for your help. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us' Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Thanks for your help, Erin. I really appreciate it! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 2:08 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Re: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, 3 The addition looks good - i l. S much more clear now. Let me k,.Al if you need anything else. Erin L. Dorn, Senior Planner Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Phone: (850) 922-1798 Fax: (850) 488-3309 <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 09/27/2005 11: 05 AM <erin.dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Erin, I just faxed you the page in the Ordinance that we will change in order to make it more clear that the Resort Facilities Overlay would be applied through a land use plan amendment. As such, we did not submit a map, as the plan classification will not be applied as an overlay to one specific area, but instead will be applied on a case-by-case basis in eligible zoning district categories. Let me know what you think after you've had a chance to review it. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at the number shown below. Thanks for your help! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. 4 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Friday, October 07,20054:03 PM 'Erin. Dorn@dca.state.f1.us' RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Erin, I had just a quick question about a mixed-use land use category (Resort Facilities High) that would allow a range of uses including residential, overnight accommodations and retail/commercial. Does DCA have expectations about how we determine the maximum development potential in an area like this in order to determine traffic impacts? As an example, should we base our analysis on the highest traffic generating use, or would DCA support assumptions about the likely mix of uses as a basis of analysis? Thanks for your help. Have a good weekend. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 4:59 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, We would need the same data and analysis that would be supplied when any land use change is proposed: public'facilities (available potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water capacity to meet demand at maximum development potential), maintenance of the LOS for transportation, etc. Since the overlay would most likely be applied to areas that are already developed, I don't think that we would need a detailed Natural Resources assessment, and since the amendment doesn't increase residential densities, schools would not need to be addressed. Although not required and generally not an issue for tourist accomodations, it would be good for the City to indicate how they plan to coordinate with the County on hurricane evacuation times if the overlay were to be applied in the CHHA. I 'have an excellent example from North Redington Beach if you are interested. Let me know if you have any more questions. Erin <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 10/04/2005 04:21 PM <Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater 1 Erin, As a follow-up, my supervisor requested that I check to see what type of data and analysis you would need when the Resort Facilities Overlay was applied to a specific parcel in the future. Would this be the same type of information that we currently send you for an amendment, or would you need additional data and analysis? This is in reference to the "Recommendation" section in your "OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,AND COMMENTS REPORT" dated August 26, 2005 for CPA2004-12001. As always, thanks for your help. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us' Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Thanks for your help, Erin. I really appreciate it! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 2:08 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Re: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, The addition looks good - it's much more clear now. Let me know if you need anything else. Erin L. Dorn, Senior Planner Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Phone: (850)922-1798 Fax: (850) 488-3309 <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 09/27/2005 11:05 AM <erin.dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject 2 DCA 05-1 for the City ur Clearwater Erin, I just faxed you the page in the Ordinance that we will change in order to make it more clear that the Resort Facilities Overlay would be applied through a land use plan amendment. As such, we did not submit a map, as the plan classification will not be applied as an overlay to one specific area, but instead will be applied on a case-by-case basis in eligible zoning district categories. Let me know what you think after you've had a chance to review it. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at the number shown below. Thanks for your help! Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. 3 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Friday, October 07, 20052:58 PM Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert Beach Stepbacks How about 1 :30 PM for our meeting on Monday. We'll plan to meet in Wayne's office. Thanks Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clayton, Gina Friday, October 07,2005822 AM Jarzen, Sharen Delk, Michael RE: Old Florida Thanks Sharen. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Fnday, October 07,20058:20 AM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Old Flonda Attached are the proposed changes for the Old Florida District, Le., changes to BBD, the CD Code and the necessary ordinances. When you and I meet thiS morning, Gina, I'll explain why I recommended these changes as opposed to others. However, if you want to go another way, we can go ahead and revamp this material. Since the framework is in place, any other changes should go fairly quickly. By the way, this material is on the S drive. << File: Old Florida Changes - Draft.doc >> Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Erin Dorn@dca.stateJl.us Tuesday, October 04, 2005 4:59 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE. DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, We would need the same data and analysis that would be supplied when any land use change is proposed: public facilities (available potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water capacity to meet demand at maximum development potential), maintenance of the LOS for transportation, etc. Since the overlay would most likely be applied to areas that are already developed, I don't think that we would need a detailed Natural Resources assessment, and since the amendment doesn't increase residential densities, schools would not need to be addressed. Although not required and generally not an issue for tourist accomodations, it would be good for the City to indicate how they plan to coordinate with the County on hurricane evacuation times if the overlay were to be applied in the CHHA. I have an excellent example from North Redington Beach if you are interested. Let me know if you have any more questions. Erin <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 10/04/2005 04:21 PM <Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Erin, As a follow-up, my supervisor requested that I check to see what type of data and analysis you would need when the Resort Facilities Overlay was applied to a specific parcel in the future. Would this be the same type of information that we currently send you for an amendment, or would you need additional data and analysis? This is in reference to the "Recommendation" section in your "OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,AND COMMENTS REPORT" dated August 26, 2005 for CPA2004-12001. As always, thanks for your help. Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Orlglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us' 1 Subject: RE: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Thanks for your help, Erin. I really appreciate it' Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Erin.Dorn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 2:08 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Re: DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Sharen, The addition looks good - it's much more clear now. Let me know if you need anything else. Erin L. Dorn, Senior Planner Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Phone: (850)922-1798 Fax: (850) 488-3309 <Sharen.Jarzen@my Clearwater. com> To 09/27/2005 11:05 AM <erin.dorn@dca.state.fl.us> cc Subject DCA 05-1 for the City of Clearwater Erin, I just faxed you the page in the Ordinance that we will change in order to make it more clear that the Resort Facilities Overlay would be applied through a land use plan amendment. As such, we did not submit a map, as the plan classification will not be applied as an overlay to one specific area, but instead will be applied on a case-by-case basis in eligible zoning district categories. Let me know what you think after you've had a chance to review it. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at the number shown below. Thanks for your help! 2 Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. 3 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: . Clayton, Gina Friday, September 30,20053:47 PM Jarzen, Sharen Old Florida Sharen - can we touch basIs early next week to talk about Old Florida and any headway you have made. We also need to develop a schedule for completeness. Thanks! Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.clayton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Page 1 of3 Jarzen, Sharen From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, September 22,200510-12 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: FW: Old Florida District Another one. . . . -----Original Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 10:48 AM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Old Florida District Heads-up.... Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Original Message----- From: Brink, Carolyn Sent: Friday, August 26,20059:54 AM To: City Council . Cc: Akin, Pam; Blunt, Betty; Brumback, Garry; Goudeau, Cyndie; Harriger, Sandy; Horne, William; Irwin, Rod; Reporter Subject: FW: Old Florida District -----Original Message----- From: Doran, John Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 9:39 AM To: 'ROBERT PENNOCK' Cc: Brink, Carolyn Subject: RE: Old Florida District Bob: Thank you for the information, for your comments, and for continuing to participate in the process. I believe the staff report on Old Florida will be coming very soon, and the Council will then evaluate the information and recommendations from staff and from the public. I hope to hear from you again when we address Old Florida at our public meeting(s). john doran -----Original Message----- From: ROBERT PENNOCK [mailto:rmpennock@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:39 PM To: Doran, John 5/2/2006 Page 2 of3 Subject: Old Florida District Clearwater City Council Member John Doran, Please find the following documents and information regarding the Tourist zoned "Old Florida District". Hopefully you will find this information and these documents useful during your work session and in Council meetings regarding the "Old Florida District". 1. Please find in the Fire Life Safety Code (definitions) 3.3.25.5 which was adopted by the Clearwater City Council the definition of a high-rise building. This definition would assume that anything less than high-rise (as defined and adopted) would be labeled mid- rise or low-rise. 2. There does not appear to be any other codes or definitions that have been adopted, confirmed, or approved by Clearwater City regarding definitions of height as to high-rise, mid-rise or low-rise. 3. In tourist zoning areas NO single family homes are permitted. In Beach by Design regarding the "Old Florida District" it states "New single family dwellings and townhomes are the preferred form of development". This one sentence shows the erroneousness of this written portion of Beach by Design. No single family homes are permitted in the Tourist zoning. Out of the couple hundred properties in the "Old Florida District" there are few if any single family homes. 4. Regarding the four "Old Florida District" meetings that took place, for what they were, and how the information that was received was used, the findings still had a "recommended by the community" height of75 feet (again in line with the Fire Life Safety Code). 5. In regards to Beach by Design's erroneous wording within the "Old Florida District" I would like to suggest that a possible solution to "the problem we all have to live with" might be an amendment to Beach by Design's wording in regards to the "Old Florida District". That amendment might delete the words "New single family dwellings and townhomes are the preferred form of development". I think that if you decide to "deal with height" and agree upon the 75 foot figure, a definition of a high-rise as has already been adopted might be included in your addendum to reference what is a mid-rise, (anything lees than high-rise). I don't know what low-rise height is but would think it might be up to that 3 5 foot height I have heard discussed. I think my suggestions represent something the "entire community" can live with. I would further like to point out that to my knowledge there has been no development in the "Old Florida District" that has been requested or approved over 75 feet in height. This would also make all existing and already approved projects "legal". Thank you for your time in this matter. I hope that the documents, input and suggestions 5/2/2006 5/2l2006 Page 3 of3 help you in your work session and decision making process. Respectfully submitted, Robert M. Pennock 665 Bay Esplanade # 3 Clearwater, Florida 33767 (727) 441-1475 rmpennock@msn.com Page 1 of3 Jarzen, Sharen From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, September 22,200510'12 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: FW: Proposed changes "Old Florida Dltrict" Another one for your file. -----Original Message----- From: Brumback, Garry Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 10:50 AM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Proposed changes "Old Florida Ditrict" Garry Brumback Assistant City Manager (727) 562-4053 -----Original Message----- From: Brink, Carolyn Sent: Friday, August 26, 20059:55 AM To: Horne, William; Brumback, Garry; Irwin, Rod; Akin, Pam; Goudeau, Cyndie; Blunt, Betty; Reporter Subject: FW: Proposed changes "Old Florida Ditrict" -----Original Message----- From: Doran, John Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 9:34 AM To: 'Paul Kelley' Cc: Brink, Carolyn Subject: RE: Proposed changes "Old Florida Ditrict" Paul: Thank you for your comments and for continuing to partiCipate in the process. I believe the staff report on Old Florida will be coming in the near future, at which time the Council will evaluate the information and recommendations received, from staff and from the public I hope to hear from you again when we address Old Florida at our public meeting(s). john doran -----Original Message----- From: Paul Kelley [mailto:paul@showqueen.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:47 AM To: Hibbard, Frank; Petersen, Carlen; Doran, John; Jonson, William; Hamilton, Hoyt Subject: Proposed changes "Old Florida Ditrict" Date: 24 August 2005 To: Clearwater City Council 5/2/2006 Page 2 of3 From: Paul Kelley Re: "Old Floridau District Dear City Council, I am writing to voice my opinion in reference to the proposed changes in the "Old Florida DistrictU that will be introduced by the Planning Department. I attend most CDB meetings and have witnessed staff's growing concern about the types of projects being brought to the City over the last year. There has been little or no opposition from the public on most of these projects. City staff seems determined to limit and change the criteria set forth in Beach By Design and the Land Development Code in my district. My address is 667 Bay Esplanade. I have owned and resided at this address since 1994 and have waited with great anticipation the revitalization of my neighborhood. I am now working with a neighboring property owner and have submitted an application to redevelop our properties jointly. There have been 5 projects submitted within 50 yards of my property, 4 approved, 1 denied. Height ranging from 54 to 69 feet (all acceptable). All outstanding projects. I have no concerns with height or mass and believe the guidelines and limits of height in the Land Development Code are appropriate for this neighborhood. It has become apparent to me after a long and diligent process to approve Beach by Design and the Land Development Code that the current staff has a different vision for our neighborhood. I would like to highlight three major topics for your consideration as I would like to share as much information about the important decision in the upcoming weeks. Property Taxes In 2004 my property taxes were increased by over 50%. In 2005 my property taxes increased another 75%!! These taxes are for commercial property and this area has historically been zoned commercially, not residential. A discussion with the County Appraiser informed me that this was not an assessment of improvements I had made to the property, but the entire neighborhood had been reassessed because of many recent sales, some to developers. The comparable sales had increased dramatically in two years, many speculative sales were based on a 30 unit per acre density for redevelopment. If the guidelines or criteria are changed in the future to decrease density or realistically prohibit construction that could maximize density than all property values will be greatly decreased, possibly cut in half. I am sure it would take years, possibly never to see my property taxes recede to the level they were prior to 2001. No homestead exemption can help these inflated taxes, redevelopment (as desired by the city at inception of beach by design) is the prudent choice. Condo "Hotel/ Motel Conversionsu This is the most disturbing of all topics that is currently occurring in my neighborhood. This is the worst possible scenario for the "Old Florida Districtu. Property values will be seriously decreased, and the City realizes no benefits which are created by redevelopment. All parking will be back out or City owned spaces, no building upgrades, no landscaping, no sidewalks and remodel construction which is aesthetically horrific. This type of redevelopment does not require CDB or Council approval and is extremely dangerous because no matter what you or I want this neighborhood to look like this is what it will look like. This is the path of least resistance taken by property owners because of the high improbability to submit a development proposal that could meet staff's "expectationsu. There are four under construction, at least that many in the planning process and within months I predict all 1950's motels may go this route as a matter of economics. 5/2/2006 j\ Page 3 of3 "Old Florida" Neighborhood My observations of the Planning Department over the last two years leads me to believe staff wants to reduce the intensity of the "Old Florida District". Clearwater Beach has probably seen more redevelopment in the last three years than in the last thirty combined, this would tax any planning department. The CDB has several times over ruled staff's recommendation of denial on beach projects especial19 in the "Old Florida District". The "Old Florida District" meetings held in the spring revealed that heights of 75 feet were acceptable to the majority. I participated, spoke in favor of and still support Beach By Design and our Land Development Code. I believe the majority in our neighborhood support all proposed projects to date, there has been virtually no opposition to any project brought forward. No objections to height, to mass or other issues that staff consistently cites as not "the preferred form of development". There have been repeated references that these projects are "out of scale with the surrounding neighborhood", I have a 58', 69', 54' buildings completely surrounding my property, if anything myoId non conforming(to parking ,flood, and numerous other codes) is the property that is out of scale. The residents of this neighborhood helped pass Beach By Design, helped draft it and now when the time has come to implement it, we do not want others who do not live, work or own property here to decide how this area should be developed. A few years ago the City adopted Beach By Design, a new Land Development Code with the hopes the private sector would respond. We are ready to go, we've been ready, redevelopment of the "Old Florida District" can happen simultaneously with the Gulfview construction, and the resort construction on north and south beach. Please give a clear mandate to City staff and the Planning Department to allow the property owners of the "Old Florida District" to proceed under guidelines and codes which incorporate the following: . Density developed at current 30 units per acre . Parking ratios should drive height to unit ratio . Restrictions should not be placed on height . Eliminate the phrase "Single family dwellings and town homes are the preferred form of development" If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further please call me at 727-423-7565. Thank you. Sincerely, Paul J. Kelley 667 Bay Esplanade Clearwater Beach, FL No virus found ill this outgoing message. Checked by Ava Anti-VlfUs. Version: 7.0.344/ Virus Database: 267.10.15/81 - Release Date: 8/24/2005 5/212006 Message Page 1 of2 Jarzen, Sharen From: Web Content Sent: Wednesday, August 31,2005914 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Web Content Subject: RE: Powerpoint for Old Florida Hi, This IS now online' http://www myclearwater com/gov/depts/plan ning/dlvi~lons/LRplan/plans/old_f1onda/lndex, asp Thanks' e Derek Ferguson Systems AnalystlWebmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL httgJ /www_My-C 1~~..DIY.aJe.r, com (727) 562-4667 -----Orig i na I Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Tuesday, August 30,2005 11:51 AM To: Ferguson, Derek Subject: RE: Powerpoint for Old Florida Derek, attached is the file: Thanks for your help! Let me know if you need anything else Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Original Message----- From: Ferguson, Derek Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:58 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Web Content Subject: Powerpoint for Old Florida Hi, A request you made on Fnday was passed along to me about posting an Old FlOrida PowerPoint presentation to the Web site. It indicated that the file you wanted posted IS located In the S drive under Planning. I am unable to reach thiS location to retneve the file, as I'm not part of the Planning department. Could you please e-mail me the file you want posted, or place it at F,\lnformatlon_Technology\DFerguson Instead? I'll post this once I have it from you 5/4/2006 Message 5/4/2006 Page 2 of2 Thanks! Derek Ferguson Systems AnalystlWebmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL l1J1Q.j(www)\i1y_Clearwater com (727) 562-4667 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Web Content Monday, August 22, 2005 10'39 AM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida You are welcome Let me know If there's anything else you need, Derek Ferguson Systems Analyst/Webmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL <http'/Iwww MvClearwater,com> (727) 562-4667 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:35 AM To: Web Content Subject: RE: Old Florida Thanks so much' Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727 -562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: . Web Content Sent: Monday, August 22,2005 10:25 AM To: Jarzen, Sharen Cc: Ready, Cky; Web Content Subject: RE: Old Flonda HI, This IS posted <<http.l/www mvclearwater com>> <<http //www mvclearwater com/qov/depts/plannlnq/dlvlslons/LRplan/plans/old florida/index asp>> Thanks! Derek Ferguson Systems Analyst/Webmaster Information Technology Department City of Clearwater, FL <<http'//www MvClearwater com>> (727) 562-4667 -----Onglnal Message---n From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 9:40 AM To: Ferguson, Derek Cc: Ready, Cky Subject: Old Flonda Derek, Cky will be talking to you about putting some information on the web about the Old Florida Distnct. Attached is the bulk of the announcement If you need it. Thanks! ' 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Friday, June 10, 2005 3:39 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Old Florida Website Information that looks fine, Thanks. -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Friday, June 10, 20053:36 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Old Flonda Webslte Information Gina, below IS the website information to post for the fourth public meeting Is this OK with you, or should some changes be made. Thanks' Fourth Public Meeting - 6/8/05 The first presentation to the audience consisted of a summary of the results of the past three meetings. This included the drawings of the land uses and height plans that had received the most votes from participants at the previous meeting. Uses Plan #2 received the most votes; and, as both Height Plans #1 and #2 had received a very similar number of votes, they were both selected. See the "Old Florida District" presentation below. Subsequently, the architectural firm, Graham Design Associates, presented design concepts based on the uses and height plans selected. Their presentation was a dual presentation, and both presentations are shown below in "Old Florida Project #1" and "Old Florida Project #2." A discussion was held to receive feedback from the participants regarding the design concepts. . Old Florida District . Old Florida Proiect #1 . Old Florida Proiect #2 . Agenda for Fourth Public Meeting Sharen Jarzen, AICP Plannmg Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Friday, June 10, 2005 3,36 PM Clayton, Gina Old Florida Website Information Gina, below IS the website information to post for the fourth public meeting. Is this OK with you, or should some changes be made, Thanks' Fourth Public Meeting - 6/8/05 The first presentation to the audience consisted of a summary of the results of the past three meetings. This included the drawings of the land uses and height plans that had received the most votes from participants at the previous meeting. Uses Plan #2 received the most votes; and, as both Height Plans #1 and #2 had received a very similar number of votes, they were both selected. See the "Old Florida District" presentation below. Subsequently, the architectural firm, Graham Design Associates, presented design concepts based on the uses and height plans selected. Their presentation was a dual presentation, and both presentations are shown below in "Old Florida Project #1" and "Old Florida Project #2." A discussion was held to receive feedback from the participants regarding the design concepts. . Old Florida District . Old Florida Proiect #1 . Old Florida Proiect #2 . Agenda for Fourth Public Meeting Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Thursday, June 09, 2005 2'50 PM Clayton, Gina FW' Angela Delgado Update on Angela. She called and said she had talked with her editor after she and I spoke, Their present plans are now that they won't be dOing a story until Council acts on the matter I'm going to mail her the CDs, Instead of her picking them up, Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 mnOnglnal Messagem-- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, June 09,. 2005 2:29 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Angela Delgado tks -----Onglnal Message--m From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 1:54 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Angela Delgado I burned it on CD and she is commg over to pick it up, Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 --mOnglnal Messagemn From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 12:06 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen SUbject: RE: Angela Delgado I think If we burn her a copy of the presentation - she should be able to come here to pick them up thanks -----Onglnal Message--m From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:49 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Angela Delgado Gma, Just to let you know that I tned sending Jim's two PowerPoint presentations to Angela Delgado this morning via e-mail The files were too large to make It through the system, even when I tned to send them separately, I've sent Angela an e-mail and also left a message on her vOice mall to check with her how she wants to receive the Information, Since the e-mail with the PowerPOInts didn't work, If necessary, I can take the original CDs down to her office on Gulf-to-Bay later today, but IS thiS necessary? I'm not sure how important it is from the City's viewpoint that the information get to her today Thanks, Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department 1 Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Thursday, June 09, 2005 2'29 PM Jarzen, Sharen RE: Angela Delgado tks -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 1:54 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Angela Delgado I burned It on CD and she is coming over to pick it up, Sharen J arzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 12:06 PM To: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: RE: Angela Delgado I think if we burn her a copy of the presentation - she should be able to come here to pick them up. thanks -----Onglnal Message----- From: Jarzen, Sharen Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:49 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Angela Delgado Gina, Just to let you know that I tried sending Jim's two Powerpolnt presentations to Angela Delgado this morning via e-mail The files were too large to make it through the system, even when I tned to send them separately, I've sent Angela an e-mail and also left a message on her voice mail to check with her how she wants to receive the information, since the e-mail with the PowerPolnts didn't work If necessary, I can take the anginal CDs down to her office on Gulf-to-Bay later today, but IS this necessary? I'm not sure how Important it is from the City'S viewpoint that the Information get to her today Thanks, Sharen Jarzen, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 727-562-4626 1 " Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Subject: Jarzen, Sharen Monday, May 16, 2005 1,03 PM Web Content RE: Old Florida docs to web Thanks' Sharen -----Onglnal Message----- From: Web Content Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 12:51 PM To: Wlelecki, Karl Cc: Jarzen, Sharen; Web Content Subject: RE: Old Florida docs to web HI, ThiS IS completed' http://www, myclearwater com/gov/depts/planning/d ivisions/LRplan/plans/old _florida/index, asp Thanks! Derek Ferguson Systems AnalysUWebmaster Department of Information Technology City of Clearwater, FL http://www.MyClearwater.com (727) 562-4667 -----Onglnal Message----- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:22 AM To: Ferguson, Derek Cc: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old FlOrida docs to web Derek, Pis post the following docs under the 3rd meeting headmg, You may label the Word document as "Results of Voting on SIX Old Florida Plans", The Jpg files should be labeled as Heights Plan 1, Heights Plan 2, Uses Plan 1, etc, Also, mclude this descnptlon under the heading "Attendees were presented with six versions of the Old FlOrida dlstnct. three plans of vanous dlstnbutions of uses and three plans of various building heights/transition zones. Architectural firm Graham Design Associates based the maps on the voting that occurred at the second meeting, At the end of the presentation, members of the public were asked to Identify [by plaCing a dot on] their one preferred Uses plan and one favorite Heights plan, and were encouraged to proVide comments For the dot tally and complete comment listing, click on Results of Votlnq on SIX Old Florida Plans," <<File uses-2 jpg>> <<File' height-2 jpg>> <<File: height-3,jpg>> <<File: uses-1.jpg>> <<File, helght- 1 jpg>> <<File, uses-3,jpg>> <<File, 3rd mtg results,doc >> Also, I will be passing thiS project on to Planner Sharen Jarzen (copied), All future correspondence will be coming from her, Thanks Karl Wielecki, AICP 1 Jarzen. Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Web Content Monday, May 16, 2005 12,51 PM Wlelecki, Karl Jarzen, Sharen; Web Content RE Old Florida docs to web Hi, This is completed' http //www myclearwater, com/gov/depts/planni ng/divlsions/LRplan/plans/old _flonda/lndex asp Thanks! Derek Ferguson Systems AnalystlWebmaster Department of Information Technology City of Clearwater, FL http IIwww,MyClearwatercom (727) 562-4667 -----Onglnal Messagem-- From: Wleleckl, Karl Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:22 AM To: Ferguson, Derek Cc: Jarzen, Sharen Subject: Old Flonda docs to web Derek, Pis post the follOWing docs under the 3rd meeting heading. You may label the Word document as "Results of Voting on SIX Old Flonda Plans" The Jpg files should be labeled as Heights Plan 1, Heights Plan 2, Uses Plan 1, etc, Also, Include this descnptlon under the heading, "Attendees were presented with SIX versions of the Old Florida district three plans of vanous dlstnbutlons of uses and three plans of vanous bUilding heights/transition zones, Architectural firm Graham Design Associates based the maps on the voting that occurred at the'second meeting, At the end of the presentation, members of the public were asked to identify [by placing a dot on] their one preferred Uses plan and one favorite Heights plan, and were encouraged to provide comments, For the dot tally and complete comment listing, click on Results of Votinq on SIX Old Flonda Plans." << File' uses-2,jpg>> <<File' helght-2.jpg>> <<File height-3,jpg>> <<File: uses-1 Jpg>> <<File: helght-1 jpg >> <<File: uses-3,jpg>> <<File' 3rd mtg results, doc >> Also, I will be passing this project on to Planner Sharen Jarzen (copied), All future correspondence Will be coming from her, Thanks Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727-562-4553 karl, wielecki@myclearwater.com 1 ~ Jarzen, Sharen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wielecki, Karl Monday, May 16, 20059'22 AM Ferguson, Derek Jarzen, Sharen Old Florida docs to web Derek, Pis post the following docs under the 3rd meeting heading You may label the Word document as "Results of Voting on SIX Old Florida Plans". The Jpg files should be labeled as Heights Plan 1, Heights Plan 2, Uses Plan 1, etc, Also, include this description under the heading: "Attendees were presented with SIX versions of the Old Florida district' three plans of various distributions of uses and three plans of various building heights/transition zones, Architectural firm Graham Design Associates based the maps on the voting that occurred at the second meeting. At the end of the presentation, members of the public were asked to identify [by placing a dot on] their one preferred Uses plan and one favorite Heights plan, and were encouraged to provide comments, For the dot tally and complete comment listing, click on Results of Votina on Six Old Flonda Plans" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ uses-2.]pg height-2.jpg helght-3.]pg uses-l.] pg height-l.jpg uses-3.jpg 3rd mtg results. doc Also, I will be passing this project on to Planner Sharen Jarzen (copied), All future correspondence will be coming from her Thanks Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727 -562-4553 karl, wielecki@myclearwater,com 1 ~ ,,"" <::{~).rft" f b:J SITE PUH - USES OPTION #1 ""Yt (% h..:;''''' A1,,"~ < ....'XJr + ~ -';\"<( sITe PLAN. USES OPTION #2 OLD I'LORII)4 Dtm'UCT CUARWATE'R ItAOf ~~rilfFr~' _1'_ - ~ _"'-'_1'___ _Al_ . ..unD _ OS'WlOOllIll1'NV_J(Jl_ ___l 'ClfUC 0_ I ...t..~'**''''' SITE PI.AH ... HEIGHT OPllOH #2 - ~ PlllII.le "tQ $H;)t':AtJ' (~~ ~~ Of fHaS 0J010tU~ tr4'" 0thf# H.,A,""4$, PtAC( ~~) 001 ~N llQ oox. C$t{..W l:l D'-o' __illIGHI' W-o' __1IIIClHI' 60'00' __11I_ SITE PLAN. HEIGHT 0PTl0N #2 OLD nORmA DlS1RJ(T CUARWATESl SUCH ~~f€R:'F'l'bAIOA SITE PlAN .. HEIGHT OPTION #3 - ~ 'lllWC "-0 W-t~(A If 1(:.t:Tt PRt-f"m~Ja OJ: r~ ~.~.N mOl r~ ~t:~14ti( t tM...$ ~ hA<$; A Rev C0t <...,: ~*'t: 0f";, mhtk",/ (;J D'00'___ 10'00'011-'-_ ""00' __1lI_ srre PLAN. HEIGHT OPTION.:t OLD "LORID. DI$1'JUCT CLEARWATER lEACH ~cW1Wj\+r~~ I I J lOtS" b:] SITE PLAN '" USES OPTJON II ~ P<tP.4""~"v,", {1.fv~ S. ;~ t~h~ SITe PLAN . uses OPTION #1 OLD nomDA 01S'l'Rl(1' a.fMlWAft:R SUCH ~fl!l\~FlOill~ GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P.A. AACHlttCTS-Pl..llNHlINI .___.... ---'II _1'_ - ~ _'11"_ 1'"__ '.-0 0llI_____ HCmV_ I_-~l l4lllCtJllSI (lfl"_.n.....,OI'f'lCI_ W__AfOItIl\ - -- I: I ~{;Th~ SnE PLAN - HEIGHT OPTION II 1<.)l1-",ttCI\:lf f{A,:; h~'f~FRft~-t t;jJ 1l1~:$PWt{\ttt\ r~ Q-1htfl rw.m~ PtM'.;tAtttnOOl' l~~ r~% ft1..( t?f{t)-h ".... .oAl'_ ... ~ ,- W4'~_ "'-0'___ SITE PlAN. HEIGHT OPTION #1 0&.1'1 '&'OM'M l'IlSTRlCT CUARWAltR BEACH ....~TER<Fl~- I I ' "' ....ht.~ .OAT .... SITE PJAN - USES OP11OH #3 - ~ _"4_yANltOWlll~ ~- ~ ~ :;;j~/A."..t< "0l A :..J .... htq)-W,A,*1}'~"''!';::'' ~, " ~:i'~~~'ir" ~'>9'< ~r 110'1'1.1'_ '_1l1llG1If ~IIS) . _.om IlS'I'fl.OOIlIlUAIV__ llt$lI.lJJIlIM MtJl4, - USES OPTION #3 OLI) 'LORI.O,\ I).c.mucr CUARWA1!R lEACH - 'm~Ui: FWlll1lA~ ~:~--,~L= I Old Florida District 3rd Public Planning Meeting- Plans Prepared by Graham Design I Uses Plans #2*- 41 dots (73% of "uses" dots) #1- 15 (27%)- #3- 0 (0%) TOT AL- 56 Heights Plans #1 **- 26 dots (46% of "heights" dots) #2- 22 (39%)--- #3- 8 (14%) TOTAL- 56 *U ses Plan #2 Multi-family and overnight accommodations everywhere except along Manda1ay Residential over commercial along Mandalay Public spaces as existing Parking garage south of Royal Way between Mandalay and Poinsettia **Heights Plan #1 50' along beach and lots along north side of Somerset 75' everywhere else Meetine: Attendees' Comments Uses Plan #1 . From Royal to Bay Esplanade between Mandalay and Poinsettia Ave should be joined with City and Verizon land to fulfill parking needs. . Green land from Rec Center to Gulf should remain as is but improved. . We need nice condos and motels to upgrade area and draw a high grade of people. . · Doesn't allow overnight accommodations along beach which I feel is [a negative] of current zoning. · (A negative): overnight accommodations in backyards of single-family residences. . (A positive): garage, but needs to be behind businesses on Mandalay. . Do not like garage near city park. . Parking should not be on sand view. Autos do not need views. . Make sure we have water, sewer, and electric. . When bridge opens the roundabout has to be changed. . We need affordable accommodations. . Will there be underground power lines? · I cannot believe anyone has a choice if we cannot provide roads, plumbing, evacuation, etc., I would prefer a choice or choices made after we look at the flooding problem. . Maybe we cannot have any more high residences? . It would be nice if the City could/would enforce "illegal" rentals-too much transience, and in large groups. · Someone should go on the internet to sites like www.myfloridavacation.com (and others like it) and see all the illegal rentals advertised (i. e., 1 night where zoning is 1 month, etc.) What good is zoning, if no enforcement? Uses Plan #2 · It would be nice to get rid of old and rundown motels and replace them. New condos and motels look better. · Please don't pave Mandalay Park for a parking garage; put it between the Rec Center and tennis courts. · Parking garage at Rockaway. · We need nice condos and motels on bays ide to update the area and draw nice people. ~-.-Maximize the parking space between swimming pool~andRec Center. · Do not expand Frenchy 's and Palm Pavilion parking lot at taxpayer expense. · (A positive): agree with multi-family but Ifeel we should accommodate a larger development (hotel) along beach if opportunity presents itself. · (A negative): There should not be overnight accommodations in backyards of single-family residences. · (A positive): Lower density= less strain on infrastructure (i.e., traffic congestion). · The old hotels are horrible and need to be mixed with condos and big motels on gulf side. · The old hotels are an eye-sore and need to be replaced with new condos to increase curb appeal in this area. · I agree with both of the above comments. · Fire station area-make park closest to beach area, and parking garage on Mandalay side along with firehouse. Uses Plan #3 · Make developers responsible waterfront builders by building some transient dockage for visitors of residents or public, if feasible. · Have requirements for new businesses or restaurants to provide dockage for patr.ons. · Developers can work with City to create a much more boat-friendly community. This adds a lot of value to the area and creates a much broader range of public usage of the waterways. · Get rid of old run-down motels and replace them with new up to date buildings (condos and motels). · (A negative): overnight accommodations in backyards of single-family residences. · "All hotels on gulf side" is a real bad idea-that is already a crappy area to be in because of the rundown motels. No pride in ownership. · We need nice condos and motels on bay side to up-grade area. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Heights Plan #1 · No choice for current zoning provided! · Make whole district 75'. It is an appropriate transition from 150'. · Lets get rid of the old rundown motels and replace them with new condos and motels. · Stay with what we have now. · Height definitions infirst two meetings misleading. For future meetings, please be complete with definitions. FEMA plus elevator, etc. 28 feet. · Many areas in Florida-Punta Gorda, St. Augustine Beach, Dunedin-have height restrictions of 35-50 feet... Clearwater should adopt the same for this transitional 40 acres. · Next meeting-please discuss the merge of Beach By Design, current zoning, future zoning. Share some time lines for arriving at decisions/code that will be enforced. · Heights should be kept to minimum. Lets keep the breeze. · No setback variances to allow more structures and heights. · Too much height bays ide. Not enough for resort-type accommodations beachside. Tunnel effect along Mandalay. . Add City parking in the retail area to ease parking burdens. . Agree with the needfor city parkingfor retail. Suggest it be behind businesses on east side ofMandalay. . We need nice condos and motels on gulf side the upgrade the area. . Need 35' buffer height along Acacia. As shown, there are only two heights-50' and 75 '. . Need the height on gulf side to better the area. Nobody will buy and make better area at present prices unless incentive is there. Need at least 60 feet to do anything good for area. . Don't have beachside 75' (which-becomes realistically closer to 100') or the island will be -"walled in" on the gulf side-our biggest asset. . Heights should include all additions and FEMA rules. 75' should be 75', not 100 '. Heights Plan #2 . Infrastructure (sewer, drainage, electricity, parking, street access, egress and ingress) . The lesser of 3 evils. Need more transition of height north-especially just north of Rec Center-to encourage development, and south side of Somerset to ramp up from residential area. I can live with/support height of 60' along beach if setbacks from Mandalay approximately 30 '-properties would need to be consolidated. I like current look of properties between Glendale and Heilwood, where grass and hedge are along Mandalay (4 stories over parking). This gets rid of the tunnel effect. . I think the heights are too high! The heights presented should be from ground level, not the FEMA 6-8' start point. . No more condos! . Property between Royal and Bay Esplanade and Mandalay and Poinsettia should be joined with City and Verizon land for a parking garage, multi-use with a height allowance necessary to allow it to happen, leaving the municipal boulevard between the gulf and the Rec Center as is but even improved as is. . Get rid of the old motels and riffraff; get new motels and condos. Make it nicer. . Most people at meeting could not decide between options 1 and 2 because the height on gulf side is too low, but this option is a problem. . This is the best of all bad plans because the height on all is too great for a transitional area. Streets will become tunnels and building walls between public spaces and beaches and water. · Very bad rundown motels have incentive to stay rundown and unkempt while higher. Impossible if gulf is not at least 60 feet. . 2-story limit on any building on the gulfs ide is absurd. There are plenty of properties owned by prestigious companies with lots of money who have built massive condos. The ability to build taller buildings would only draw more of a class of people to the beach which would overall enhance property values and the overall society that is needed on Clearwater beach. . Building height should be total including FEMA, etc. . There should be a step-down in height towards Mandalay to avoid a canyon effect. . Why have Beach By Design if you don't let it get used. . There should not be a height limit. That is what Beach By Design is for. Heights Plan #3 · Lowest heights should start at Cambria Street, using that as a line of demarcation across the island. Use [35'} on all 3 maps. · To encourage more hotel development, I would like to see the height raised to 135 '. . Ditto. . South side of Somerset should be no more than 50'. Plan does not transition north to south. · I would like to see height raised and we need nice condos and motels on bay side to upgrade area.