Loading...
TA2008-07003, ORD 7997-08, August 19, 2008 ~ Clearwater To: Community Development Board Members Date: Robert Tef~Kanager August 07,2008 From: RE: Case: TA2008-07003 - Amendments to the Community Development Code The Staffreport will be emailed to you on Thursday, August 14,2007 before 5:00 P.M. Case: T A2008-07003 - Amendments to the Community Development Code Level Three Application Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department. Request: Amendments to the Community Development Code to adopt criteria by which sandwich board signs may be permitted in certain areas, provide a fee for such signage, and to add a definition for traditional urban corridor. Presenter: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. CDB Meeting Date: August 19, 2008 Case Number: TA2008-07003 Ordinance No.: 7997-08 Agenda Item: E. 1. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: Amendments to the Community Development Code to adopt criteria, by which sandwich board signs may be permitted in certain areas, provide a fee for such signage, and to add a definition for traditional urban corridor. INITIATED BY: City of Clearwater Planning Department BACKGROUND: The proposed amendments to the Community Development Code (CDC) have resulted from code compliance issues with sandwich board signs and the like in the Downtown (D) District. As a result of these issues, and the completion of the Cleveland Street Streetscape Project, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance that would allow such signage to be present on a temporary basis (not to exceed one-year) in order to promote economic development in this developing area. ANALYSIS: The proposed ordinance would accomplish three things. First, the ordinance establishes several criteria by which sandwich board or other “A” frame type signs may be permitted. Among these criteria are the following: Sandwich board signs may be displayed on the sidewalk only during hours of operation of the ?? business and within the linear frontage of the specific business location being advertised. Under no circumstance shall the sandwich board sign be stored exterior to the business location; The size of any sandwich board sign shall not exceed 42 inches in height, 20 inches in width; ?? No sandwich board sign shall be placed so as to block any public way, or within the visibility triangle ?? of intersections or driveways. Placement may not reduce sidewalk width to less than four feet clear area. Placement may not impede ingress or egress from a business entrance nor block access or visibility of a fire hydrant; The sandwich board sign shall be of a non-illuminated, freestanding, two-sided design comprised of ?? metal, wood or synthetic materials such as chalkboard. The sign shall not be made from plastic or use plastic lettering, and shall not include a whiteboard; The sandwich board sign shall be professionally designed and may use shapes and forms indicative of ?? the type of business and the services being advertised; however such signs may not include sponsorships or advertisements for products; Design must be reviewed and approved before placement. Placement prior to approval will not ?? necessitate approval of the application as submitted; and The sandwich board sign may not be attached to any structure or pole, and may not include any ?? moving parts or attachments, including but not limited to: balloons, pennants and streamers. However, attachable items such as a removable chalkboard, that is intended to be an integral part of the sign and is not precluded by any other of these criteria, may be permitted. Community Development Board – August 19, 2008 TA2008-07003 – Page 1 Second, the ordinance adopts a definition for the term “traditional urban corridor,” which is used in the aforementioned criteria for determining where sandwich board signs may be located. And third, the ordinance amends the Schedule of Fees, Rates, and Charges to establish a fee in the permitting of sandwich board signs. The proposed Ordinance No. 7997-08 is attached and includes each of the amendments. Within the ordinance document, text that is underlined indicates proposed language and text containing strikethroughs indicate deletions. CRITERIA FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS: CDC Section 4-601 sets forth the procedures and criteria for reviewing text amendments. All text amendments must comply with the following: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Below is a selected list of goals, objectives and policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan that are furthered by the proposed amendments to the CDC: Objective 4.1 All signage within the City of Clearwater shall be consistent with the Clearwater sign code, as found within the Community Development Code, and all proposed signs shall be evaluated to determine their effectiveness in reducing visual clutter and in enhancing the safety and attractiveness of the streetscape. Policy 4.1.1 Commercial signs in Clearwater shall be restricted to discourage the proliferation of visual clutter, promote community aesthetics, provide for highway safety, and to allow the identification of business locations. 2. The proposed amendment furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan. The proposed text amendment will further the purposes of the CDC in that it will be consistent with the following purposes set forth in CDC Section 1-103: It is further the purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the City a matter ?? of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the City are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law (CDC Section 1-103.D). Provide the most beneficial relationship between the uses of land and buildings and the ?? circulation of traffic throughout the City, with particular regard for safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian traffic movement (CDC Section 1-103.E.4). REVIEW BY OTHERS: Downtown Development Board (DDB): At its meeting of August 6, 2008, the DDB reviewed the proposed ordinance and recommended a few changes to the approval criteria for sandwich board signs. These comments, which dealt with allowable materials, attachments and sponsorships/advertisements, have been incorporated into the current ordinance language. Clearwater Chamber of Commerce: The Clearwater Chamber of Commerce has been provided with a copy of the proposed text amendment to receive their input; however, to date no comments have been received. Community Development Board – August 19, 2008 TA2008-07003 – Page 2 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The proposed amendments to the Community Development Code are consistent with and will further the goals of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the Community Development Code. APPROVAL Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends of Ordinance No. 7997-08 that amends the Community Development Code. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: __________________________________________ Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager ATTACHMENT: ??Ordinance No. 7997-08 S:\Planning Department\Community Development Code\2008 Code Amendments\TA2008-07003 - Sandwich Board Signs\Ordinance No 7997-08 CDB Staff Report 2008 08-19.doc Community Development Board – August 19, 2008 TA2008-07003 – Page 3