FLD2008-06016 - 1996 Gulf to Bay Blvd
FLD2008-06016
1996 GULF TO BAY BLVD
ZY LLC
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
ATLAS # 289A
ZONING: C
LAND USE: CG
RECEIVED: 06/02/2008
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CL WCoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
August 19.2008
FLD2008-060 16
Dl
YZ, LLC
Joseph Perlman
1996 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PL~GDEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to permit the re-establishment of an
automobile service station in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction
to the front (south) setback from 25 to five feet (to existing pavement), a
reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 to five feet (to existing
pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 to 7.33 feet (to
existing building), to four feet (to existing pavement) and to one-foot (to
existing covered concrete slab), reductions to the side (west) setback from
10 to seven feet (to existing pavement) and to 6.5 feet (to existing
dumpster enclosure), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and reductions to the perimeter
buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and S. Hercules Avenue from 15 to
five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer
along the north property line from five to four feet (to existing pavement)
and to one-foot (to existing covered concrete slab), as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.
CURRENT ZONING:
Commercial (C) District
CURRENT FUTURE LAND Commercial General (CG)
USE CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use: Automobile Service Station
Proposed Use: Automobile Service Station
EXISTING
SURROUNDING ZONING
AND USES:
North: Commercial (C) District
South: Institutional (I) District
East: Commercial (C) District
West: Commercial (C) District
Parking lot for offices
Clearwater High School
Retail sales
Offices
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.497 acres is located at the northwest comer of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and S. Hercules Avenue. The
site contains an existing 643 square foot building, automated car wash, gas pumps and canopy completed
in 1988. Planning staff determined that an "automobile service station" land use was established on this
site in 1988 and successively occupied by Gulf Oil, Mobil Oil and BP. Metro Petro LLC applied for an
occupational license for a gas station/convenience store/carwash January 31, 2005, but failed to complete
the application process and the application was voided. On February 28,2008, in response to a request
for zoning approval for a Business Tax Receipt (occupational license) to operate a gas
Community Development Board - August 19,2008
FLD2008-060 16 - Page 1 of 8
station/convenience store/carwash on the site, that such re-establishment requires a Flexible
Development application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project use, due to the site not
meeting certain development and landscape criteria. On March 1, 2008, the owner filed an appeal of this
decision (Case No. APP2008-00003). On May 20, 2008, the Community Development Board (CDB)
denied the appeal request. This application was filed in order to re-establish the automobile service
station at this location.
Office uses are located adjacent to the north and west, with attached dwellings located farther north. The
area along Gulf to Bay Boulevard can be characterized as commercially developed within the
Commercial (C) District, with office and retail sales and services uses and another automobile service
station within close proximity of the. subj ect property. Clearwater High School is located across Gulf to
Bay Boulevard to the south within the Institutional (n District.
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to permit the re-establishment of an automobile service station on this property. The
existing retail building, car wash building and gas pumps will be used in their present location. Vehicle
fueling stations require vehicles to be parked in a north/south orientation at the pump islands. The existing
underground gas tanks are located on the north side of the property. The existing site is accessed by a
driveway on the north side of the site on S. Hercules Avenue and by two driveways on Gulf to Bay
Boulevard. In order to re-establish the automobile service station, staff requires the removal of the eastern
driveway on Gulf to Bay Boulevard, as this driveway is too close to S. Hercules Avenue. The applicant is
proposing to close this eastern driveway and replace it with a landscape buffer equal in depth as the existing
landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The closing of this existing eastern driveway will not
compromise tanker truck access to this site, as the tanker truck will continue to use the western driveway on
Gulf to Bay Boulevard to enter the site to fill the underground gas tanks on the northern portion of the site
before exiting to S. Hercules Avenue. Three parallel parking spaces will be re-established on the west side
of the site through re-striping of the pavement. The existing handicap parking space on the south side of the
convenience store will be retained and an accessible path will be established to Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The
site will be re-landscaped and dilapidated fencing replaced. An existing shed-type roof over a concrete slab
on the north side of the car wash building will be removed. The existing freestanding sign at the southeast
corner will be retained in its present location. Colors of and the locations of the buildings, canopy and
signage will remain in their present conditions.
Floor Area Ratio: Pursuant to the Section 2-701.1, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for properties
with a designation of Commercial General (CG) land use is 0.55. Based on the proposed floor area of
643 square feet, the proposed FAR is 0.029 and is, therefore, consistent with the Countywide Future
Land Use Plan with regard to the maximum allowable FAR.
Impervious Surface Ratio (LS.R.): Pursuant to Section 2-701.1 of the Community Development Code,
the maximum allowable LS.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed LS.R. is 0.82, which is consistent with the
Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to Table 2-703 of the Community Development Code, the
minimum lot width and area for an automobile service station use is 10,000 square feet and 100 feet
respectively. The subject property is 21,644 square feet in area and has 144 feet of frontage along Gulf
to Bay Boulevard and 150 feet of frontage along S. Hercules Avenue. The proposal is consistent with
these Code provisions.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-703 of the Community Development Code, the minimum front
setback for an automobile service station use is 25 feet (parking lots can be at a minimum of 15 feet) and
Connnunity Development Board - August 19,2008
FLD2008-06016 - Page 2 of8
the minimum side setback is 10 feet. Since the subject property is a comer lot, the south and east
portions of the property must meet a front setback, while the north and west sides must meet a side
setback. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 to five feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 to five feet (to existing pavement), reductions to
the side (north) setback from 10 to 7.33 feet (to existing building), to four feet (to existing pavement) and to
one-foot (to existing covered concrete slab) and reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 to seven feet
(to existing pavement) and to 6.5 feet (to existing dumpster enclosure). This application must be processed
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project due to the proposed setback reductions being less than the
minimums set forth in the Code.
The applicant desires to re-establish the automobile service station basically as it presently exists.
Important to staff is the elimination of the eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay Boulevard that does not meet
current spacing requirements from intersections. The applicant has agreed to remove this driveway and
install a landscape buffer at the same depth as the existing buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard, which is
approximately five feet in depth. While the site does not meet current setback requirements to structures
(pavement), any widening of the perimeter buffers would create functionality issues for the operation of
the service station as it is presently developed. Upgrading the landscaping within these perimeter buffers
would significantly improve the visual appearance of this site. The existing dumpster enclosure in the
northwest portion of the site is located 6.5 feet to the west property line. Its location is acceptable, so
long as the enclosure is repaired or replaced. There presently exists a covered slab on the north side of
the car wash building that is used for mechanical equipment and supplies for the car wash. Staff cannot
find any record for the shed roof over the concrete slab. The applicant proposes to remove this existing
shed roof. The deteriorated fencing around this slab encroaches onto the property to the north and the
applicant will relocate and repair or replace this fence.
The adjacent office building to the west and its associated parking lot to the north of the subject site is
developed with pavement at similar setbacks to that existing at this automobile service station.
Commercial property to the east and southeast are presently developed with pavement at less than five
leet in depth from the property line, with many at a zero feet front setback. The existing church parking
lot to the northeast across S. Hercules Avenue is located approximately at a similar setback as the subject
property. The parking lot pavement at Clearwater High School across Gulf to Bay Boulevard is at a zero-
foot front setback. Based on this existing character of the surrounding area, the existing pavement
setbacks at this site are compatible and consistent with this character. The upgrading of the landscaping
within these existing buffers will enhance this site and assist in the improvement of the visual aspect at
this intersection.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Tables 2-703 of the Community Development Code, the
maximum allowable height as a minimum standard for an automobile service station use is 25 feet. The
existing gas canopy over the convenience store and gas pumps is approximately 16.7 feet to the top of the
canopy, well below the minimum standard height.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Table 2-703 of the Community Development Code, the
minimum required parking for an automobile service station is five spaces per 1,000 square feet of GF A.
As such, the minimum number of required parking spaces is three parking spaces. The proposal includes
four parking spaces, three parallel spaces on the west side and one handicap space on the south side of the
convenience store, which exceeds the minimum required amount of parking spaces.
The proposal includes the removal of the eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay Boulevard. This existing
driveway does not meet current driveway spacing requirements from intersections and its removal will
Cormnunity Development Board - August 19, 2008
FLD2008-06016 - Page 3 of 8
reduce turning movements and increase safety along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. A FDOT permit is required to
remove this driveway.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.l of the Community Development Code, all outside
mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting
properties. Mechanical equipment for the convenience store is located on its roof, while mechanical
equipment for the car wash is located on a concrete slab on the north side of the car wash building. The
car wash mechanical equipment is screened with opaque fencing. This fencing has deteriorated and will
be repaired or replaced. Based upon the fencing being repaired or replaced, the development proposal
would be consistent with the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment.
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to
minimize hazards at driveway intersections with Gulf to Bay Boulevard and S. Hercules Avenue, no
structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above
grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. The proposed site and
landscape design meet this requirement.
Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not
involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground
unless such undergrounding is not practicable. All on-site electric and communication lines presently are
located underground in conformance with this Code requirement.
Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.l of the Community Development Code, this site is required
a IS-foot wide landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and along S. Hercules Avenue, while a
five-foot landscape buffer is required along the west and north property lines. The proposal includes
reductions to the perimeter buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and S. Hercules Avenue from 15 to five
feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from five to
four feet (to existing pavement) and to one-foot (to existing covered concrete slab).
Some of the previously approved landscaping has died and not been replaced. This proposal will replace
missing landscaping and be otherwise enhanced with additional landscaping to improve the visual
appearance of this site. The ligustrum hedge in all of the perimeter buffers will be filled in and
groundcover plants added to the buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Hercules Avenue. Missing
required trees within the south, east and north buffers will be replanted palms and crape myrtles. Similar
landscaping to that existing will be planted in the area where the eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay
Boulevard is to be removed. In conjunction with the discussion regarding required setbacks, while the
width of the landscape buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and S. Hercules Avenue will not be met, the
re-landscaping of this site will enhance this site and serve to upgrade the appearance of the surrounding
area.
Solid Waste: There exists a dumpster enclosure to the west of the car wash building in the northwest
portion of the site. The fencing for this enclosure is deteriorated and needs to be repaired or replaced.
The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Signage: This proposal does not include any change to the existing freestanding or attached signage.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There is an active Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject
property to replace landscaping that has died (CDC2008-02010). Approval of this request will require
re-Iandscaping of the property.
Community Development Board - August 19, 2008
FLD2008-060 16 - Page 4 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency
of the automobile service station use proposal with the standards as per Section 2-701.1 and Table 2-703
of the Community Development Code:
Standard Pro Dosed Consistent Inconsistent
Floor Area Ratio 0.55 0.029 X
(FAR)
I.S.R. 0.95 0.82 X
Lot Area 10,000 sf 21,644 sf X
Lot Width 100 feet Gulfto Bav Blvd - 144 feet; X
Hercules Ave - 150 feet
Setbacks Front.: 25 feet (15 feet to parking lot South (Gulfto Bav Blvd) - Xl
pavement) five feet (to existing
pavement);
East (Hercules Ave) five
feet (to existing pavement)
Side 10 feet North - 7.33 feet (to existing Xl
building); four feet (to
existing pavement); one-foot
(to existing covered concrete
slab)
West - seven feet (to
existing pavement); 6.5 feet
(to existing dumpster
enclosure )~
Height 25 feet 16.7 feet (top of canopy) X
Off-Street Five spaces per 1,000 square feet GF A Four spaces X
Parkin!! (three spacesreauired)
See analysis in Staff Report
Community Development Board - August 19,2008
. FLD2008-060 16 - Page 5 of 8
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.C of the Community
Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent
X
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of
a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
o Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
o Variety in materials, colors and textures;
o Distinctive fenestration patterns;
o Building stepbacks; and
o Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and aoorooriate distances between buildinl!:s.
X
Community Development Board - August 19,2008
FLD2008-060 16 - Page 6 of 8
Inconsistent
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfacto and hours of 0 eration im acts on ad' acent ro rties.
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meeting of July 3, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the
Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of
law:
Findings of Fact:
1. The 0.497 acres is located at the northwest comer of Gulfto Bay Boulevard and S. Hercules Avenue;
2. The site presently is developed with an automobile service station, including an existing 630 square
foot building, automated car wash, gas pumps and canopy completed in 1988;
3. The proposal is to permit the re-establishment of an automobile service station on this property;
4. The proposal includes closing the eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and replacing it with a
landscape buffer equal in depth as the existing landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard;
5. The existing eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay Boulevard does not meet current driveway spacing
requirements from intersections and its removal will reduce turning movements and increase safety
along Gulf to Bay Boulevard;
6. The proposal includes setback and landscape buffer reductions to the existing pavement, dumpster
enclosure and concrete slab north of the car wash building;
7. Based on the existing character of the surrounding area, the existing pavement setbacks at this site
are compatible and consistent with this character;
8. Parking spaces will be re-established on-site, meeting Code requirements;
9. An existing shed-type roof over a concrete slab on the north side of the car wash building will be
removed;
10. Deteriorated fencing will be repaired or replaced and be relocated to be on-site;
11. The dumpster enclosure will be improved to the satisfaction of the Solid Waste Department,
including the repair or replacement of the enclosure;
12. The proposal includes re-Iandscaping the site and enhancing the buffers along Gulfto Bay Boulevard
and S. Hercules Avenue, which will improve the visual appearance of this site;
13. There is an active Code Enforcement case relating to the landscaping on the subject property, which
will be resolved by re-landscaping the site under this proposal.
Community Development Board - August 19, 2008
FLD2008-060 16 - Page 7 of 8
Conclusions of Law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-701.1 and Table 2-
703 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.C of the
Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as
per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and
4. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses.
Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
application to permit the re-establishment of an automobile service station in the Commercial (C) District
with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the
front (east) setback from 25 to five feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from
10 to 7.33 feet (to existing building), to four feet (to existing pavement) and to one-foot (to existing covered
concrete slab), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 to seven feet (to existing pavement) and to 6.5
feet (to existing dumpster enclosure), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-704.C, and reductions to the perimeter buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and S.
Hercules Avenue from 15 to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along
the north property line from five to four feet (to existing pavement) and to one-foot (to existing covered
concrete slab), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, with the
following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That application for a building permit to construct the site improvements be submitted by September
2, 2008;
2. That, prior to the issuance of the site improvement building permit, the applicant obtain a permit
from the Florida Department of Transportation to remove the eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay
Boulevard;
3. That all site improvements be constructed within 60 days of the issuance of the site improvements
building permit;
4. That the shed roof over the concrete pad north of the car wash building be removed;
5. That the dumpster enclosure be improved to the satisfaction of the Solid Waste Department,
including the repair or replacement of the enclosure; and
6. That existing deteriorated fencing screening the mechanical equipment concrete slab on the north
side of the car wash building be relocated to be on the subject site and be repaired or replaced.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Wayne
A IT ACHMENTS:
o Location Map
o Aerial Map
o Zoning Map
o Existing Surrounding Uses Map
o Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD}IPending cases\Up for the next CDBIGulf to Bay /996 ZY LLC (C) - 8./9.08 CDB - WW\Gulf to
Bay 1996 Staff Report.doc
Community Development Board - August 19, 2008
FLD2008-060 16 - Page 8 of 8
Resume
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4504
wayne. wellsCiDmvclearwater .com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
. Planner III
Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL
November 2001 to Present
As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible
Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats
before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and
Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code
conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public
information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings).
. Zoning Coordinator
Zoning Division, City of Pin ell as Park, FL
March 1989 to November 2001
Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City
Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of
Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan
amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans;
Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted
preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning
counter or predevelopment meetings).
. Program Manager, Zoning Branch
Manatee County Department of Planning and Development
Bradenton, FL
June 1984 to March 1989
Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the
Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building perrriit review for Code
conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via
telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement
Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases
before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of
land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented
staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to
Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and
building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided
public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings).
. Planner I
Alachua County Department of Planning and Development
Gainesville, FL
June 1980 to June 1984
Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and
Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted
in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning
counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County
Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research.
. Graduate Assistant
University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning
Gainesville, FL
1979 to 1981
Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan.
. Planning Technician
Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL
1977 to 1979
Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 Y:z
years; Worked on historic survey and report.
EDUCATION
Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed,
thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981
Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976
LICENSES & CERTIFICATES
American Institute of Certified Planners
American Planning Association, Suncoast Section
(J) en en
~ .~. ill ::::>
---l m
0 J ~. ~ ::::> en :::e >-
0:: ~ ~ w 0 if z S
~ cr
0 le 0 0 0 w ()
() w ~ T 0 a:::
~ tu () ::> w
~ ~ ~.
Z
OR z
::::>
(9
GULF-TO-BAY
0::
0
ill
~
~
.((
~ u.J Cf)
c 0 ~ PROJECT
~ ~ SITE
::l
~ I-
>. ()
'0 0::
a:J <(
.c. (Q
fI)
DRUID RD
w a::: w
~. ill 0 ~
~
.~
"
Owner:
ROGERS
w
~
&
::l
m
a:::
UJ
I-
Z
()
~D
(ROYDCN
LOCATION MAP
ZY, LLC
Case:
Site:
1996 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Property
Size(Acres):
I~
Cl
a:::
~
FLD2008-060 1 6
0.497
PIN: 13/29/15/00000/240/0800
A tlas Page: 289 A
AERIAL MAP
Owner:
lY, LLC
Case:
FLD2008-060 1 6
Site:
1996 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Property
Size(Acres):
0.497
PIN: 13/29/15/00000/240/0800
Atlas Page: 289A
I I "1~n1 I l<ill<i I I l<;lil' ~.
1'\0 L1.' [JJ~\..
~~~ !;Jillf;;11l " ~:f'
~ ~~~~ ~ ~I ~l1t\~
...
~ ~~~ ~~~~ lia
1 301 1 10 301 1 I 6 ~ (;
30 1 1 1
"". on' 303 ..il? ___L__ ~,r-
0304 - - -
2 8 306 305 2 q~ni ~2 2 (;]4 I - ~ ID~ 399 ",), ~'.
307 2 ~ 9
- .lIB
308 309 308 311 - -
1.1.1 308 I
3 310 3 3 4 ~
8 > 3 3 I- 3 8 '0:(
311 310 I
'0:( ~ CI)
400 ~ 401 400 400 ::)
400 401 I 401 (Q
4 ~ 4 4 4 2001
402 7 402 2 403 4 7 ~
402 403 4/)' ~
404 to- G ~ 405 405 404 U)
406 LU 405 LU CI)
:e CI) 407 1988 ..,J
5 6 408 5 ::) 407 406
408 0 AM 6
5 0 5
410 0 409 410 411 .A ffi 409 408
CI) (;0 411 410
)c 1/ :t:
CI)
CV 0~ r-..... 8 8 8
~ 8 ~ ~
'" ~ ~ '" lia lia
'" III III
GULF- TO-BA Y BL VD
GULF- TO-BA Y BL VD
I 0 8l~I~~1 ~ t(l ~ ~ ~
100 I lia lillil,lialil lil 1;; lil lia lil lil
'il l!l I lil
~ '" llil I ~
r~ ~~12 3,415 - 8
I I I ,
12 111 , 9 1.16
10 8 7
Llh I I 8 ~
~
I I 10 lil lil
,
8
--
t(l
525 535 545 "MHffS
540 0 r- - -,
L-13~ ---1 2.9 Ac(
555
44.63 Ac
ZONING MAP
Owner:
ZY, LLC
Case:
FLD2008-060 1 6
Site:
1996 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Property
Size (Acres) :
0.497
PIN:
13/29/15/00000/240/0800
Atlas Page:
289A
I I
Attaeli ~
dwielli;l S
20~
308
.. 3 ,310
dwelli.ftl ~,
4 402 ~
oq;
404",
Retail406 ~
4080
410 0
<I)
~tail
8
44.63 Ac
Owner:
Site:
I
RAINBOW DR
~~.. ii=i
301 ... '4& died"'" 30
. ..n.. ,~.. ~^
:: 2 ~r;)) 9 3/
309
311 1
30E
,a. ~
oq;
4OOoq;
402 ~
a:
::::>>
oq;
<I)
401 dwe lings
4 7
~
Otpce1os
409 5 410
60
R. staurants
CV Q~
... ...
I I
~
II ~~ ~
301 ... "'1ti ae~d
3111 . "0 .,n,
~2 2 ~v
~
308 oq;
3.. ,3 '31~ ~
401 dw ~lIings400 :::
4 4 0
403 402 ffi
:z:
<I)
311
406
PffiCfs OffWlfl
AIIII
411 A
60
y
)ffice~
~
I~
...
8
...
'" r '" I
!I
1 1 6
___L__
_ ~ ID~ _
t' !.I.a~e_~f
\ ,.,. UI ,....p
~ 2001
'"
Retail 8
8 Retail
13/'"
o
! ~
{\uto~
60 rrvic~ion 60
GULF- TO-BA Y BL VD
GULF- TO-BA Y BL VD
Clearwater
High School
408
41/
I 80...1......10 ~;;;... ~
'" o~ 00 '" ... 0 0 0 0
100 ClI '" I"'''' '" '" '" '" '"
~ ~ ,iR taiJ : R etii Rf ail r
r l ~~ 3 14 5 8 ~
I ~ I 12: 11 10 II 9 B 7 1.16
LIO I R~tllil 1 8 ~
j. I '" I '"
Iii
ROGERS ST
525
535 545
Offices
r-----,
L-13159 ---1
555
540
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
ZY, LLC
1996 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
'"
~ Attached
dwell~
~
2.9 Ac(
Case:
FLD2008-060 1 6
Property
Size(Acres):
PIN:
0.497
13/29/15/00000/240/0800
Atlas Page:
289A
View looking northeast from Gulf to Bay Blvd of
subject ro ert
View looking west along Gulf to Bay Blvd at
subject property
View looking northeast at car wash building on
north side of subject property
1996 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
FLD2008-060 16
View looking east along Gulf to Bay Blvd at
subject property's freestanding signage
View looking north along west side of subject
property
View looking west along north side of subject
property from Hercules Ave
Sheet 1 of 2
View looking north along Hercules Ave at an
office parking lot north of subject pro erty
~ ,~ ,
View looking east at commercial development on
NE corner of Gulf to Bay Blvd and Hercules Ave
1996 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
FLD2008-060 16
View looking NE from east side of subject
property across Hercules Ave at existing church
"
View looking south at Clearwater High School
across Gulf to Bay Blvd from subject property
Sheet 2 of 2
~~-=-=-.......---.~
RECEIVED 07/01/2008 11:57 7275362714
JUL-01-2008 11:56 AM
JOSEPH PERLMAN ESQ
P.02
~ Clearwater
u~
~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727.'62-4567
Fax: 127.562.4865
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
IJ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED ANI,;l NOTARIZED APPLICATION
1:1 SUBMIT 14 CO~IES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION. Plans and
application are required to be collated. stapled, and foldlld Into sell
1:1 SUBMIT FIRE PRELlMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
1:1 SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
" NOTE: 15 TOfAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
JRevised 04/24/2007)
""PLEASE TVPE OR PRINT~
~~
::~::::"~,oc=~/!ti!/!~~~~==_".~~:~~e~~t;t~~~~~
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBeR:
CELL NUMBER:
.--.-.-...... . ...........--:;~r.-........~......... ; }.....-.-.........-...-.-..........-.--......................-.-......-.........""... ...-.........-........... .... ...............--...............-.-.....-.... .." ..................... ..................
.~~;~~~~~u~X~~!ii...-'.~.~q;:=~z~?,...~..~.:
-_.~...... ............._.__..z..__...__~_.._...._ "..__L.._..__.____ .- .--:;?-~.-.L--..-.....-.~--.-.-
.--~2.f.Lf-~-9_Q-.-..-.- EMAIL: __:zg_J:_..~.. _.f:..':'~~L_?k~!.~'!:!'::..?. .~
8. PROPOSED DEVELO~~ INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
:~:~:;:~$ LTZ.J uj ;~~!ut;:~~ .. PROJcr;4;~~\I'?P~~..
:~~~~~:~:::' -~ZL~~~W?:~!!t~;~.iO:~:~. 7~-::=~:~::=:=~:::: ,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:7bem.. ''/2'-:;li--'IJ.:--t4'o~-:07~~~-- e;::/6iJi-{ 10 I~c:tl -'~t( 07..77=--.---..- m....
(/Z~.t..,~. -1J",1!;.--i:::~ -~-----.. -.--. .~;,~~; '.-.6--:)lf~?-e Iz.---..-~.(f[:j't/7 ...<.. .,/fft'7
"_' -. fA)_~. ._y.____~----..- ---.- --:..-------TO..-r..u.ld-----/f--1..-------...-I:r-.i1---- ,
PROPOSED USE(S): ._____ _. .---6-~{9---._1-IJ.LJ~ _ 'Q..2-::'....w ..___m_m ____. .__. ~..._.._[[___________...__._...:-- ..
=~~'~:";;: ::~~:; . ~!r'lf!l:~~~~.!f1;,i}Jt;~"-~V.~~1t(j;~7et:{.-
(include number of units or square'e~rff dJrVii.:e-...t'JJf../I:-.........q:7;!-..t0J.a;;;,.q'6 ".-;7{.-a.rIf..'.;~! ~..'''''... ...-..........-.
footage of noll-reeidentlal use and all ..----;t(.............. q.-.....--.~.~......~_...._.J;f!..t!!. ....nT.......~-.-.._J6-.---7l~..... .-.--.-
~:d~~ftb~dl;c:~~U~~~a~~~~e~.~f ~.l....--.-t~_~/~}~t.~-.;7j~~. -r f~I-~.-::~Lp'~~..LI.~.-.~~f.;.~.~.~'~...~. [v::r..J;;.-,-;~.:.(.'...' ....-~..........,..,
parking apaces, speolfiC use, ate.) It? l ......I'-r-( ... l: l J '-L 'Ct. T ch '(.; ...-J ~ , '" (<
S:IPlallning DeparbnenMppllcalioll Forms\Oevelopment Review\2001 FormslComprehensive In1l11 Project (FL.D) 04-24-01 c
Page 1 of B I
RECEIVED 07/01/2008 11:57 7275362714
JUL-01-2008 11:57 AM
JOSEPH PERLMAN ESQ
P.03
Does THIS APPLICATION INVOLve THE TRANSFER OF DeveLoPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), PREVIOUSLY APPRoveD PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO yes, attach a copy of !I1e applicable documents)
~. . ROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code S.~tion 4-202.A.5)
.. SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTeSTING OWNERSHIP (see
page i")
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o ProvIde complete responses to lI1e six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain .!lm! each criteria Is ac:nleved, In detail:
1. The proposed development of!l1e land will be In t1armony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which il
Islcealed. '. /~ j ( I . /, /A/
. ~~ ~'!~;:g~1-t--fl-fl(~~77r$?-1-;:f5-t/%~*.t(~~
2. ?~~~{;~~;~fli~~~~~t#f~~~;
~~'~~f~~.. '1
At.-:!J~i..L~~-&A _t._ --e::Yr::"f---'0-;'-:;;~~-~c:';-:~--~'m'1:.e.
, ~~:~t~~:;~~~-:E:~~~'~~-~~f~;8 ~~~~Z;:;~;:~::.:::l
~:t~';{fA;ri(-'. ...... ......f;j6..ICj-....._~z~T:-f:(---.....tf..'...7J;t;i~.-;;c-~e.~...........K~. '!:r'fiR'~
Pn~f:,G---R;lfr-1 fVc- -:--:-:-f~C<..~~;~~,;;,:~7~;;,- TC~
.. ~.r,:!!l.ff~1;~~~~~~~~-;;;~~-:;:~--.-,ye
----;?i/jif1s7i;;.?gE!Eff!i"7ffp-k._-%!-J!cifZ=:-=_~~~~_:=~.=:
...--.......... '.. ...-........-..-..-----...... .,. .............-...---...,-.....-..--.............,...............-................-- .-.._......._.-......_...__.._._."'.....~...._-.............--.........-.......-...... .." , . .... ............-...-...................----....--.
5. Th. '"""",'" -Iopmont ~ton'''d ""M"";~ _, at~. ''1'"'''''''' .""'~,,~. """" '~;' ""''''''''''1. .
..._.e.~t:; :z--7j~.t~tf;Jfj!/],j}~7f;f-;1!~-,~~~-'.~"?:C'~-.-_.
-.--?IF1Dlrflt!f~f+I"A~r----;9/(;.;ir-I'i!&. C'!r;;e-;'ZiT/Li;j'-u, ~
6. ~~~~~~~-r{.~~~Zi~~f.~~~on~~~:;;C';iX:;.~~;~~,~" ><C'u
..:~~r;~j(>t_(~~zr17~~!(1~.'Ct!-~c( V ~~-~~i:~~----CLlf i
:~~[j~~~~~~r:~?L~%~._:!~4fJ.~~~~J?!9~~;t:
)U (.dle "If' fLf'')t;'V--/ va '" A--Sjec'fr./ ,rYfr
S:IPlanning DepartmentlAppllcatlon FormslDevelopment RevieW\2007 FormslComprehensive InflU Project (FLD) 04.24.07,doc
Page 2 of a
RECEIVED 07/01/2008 11:57
JUL-01-2008 11:58 AM
7275362714
JOSEPH PERLMAN ESQ
P.04
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project Criteria)
a proVide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFIL.L. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain bm1! each erlterla 1$
achieved, In detail:
1. The development or redevelopment 1$ otherwise Impractical wtthol.lt deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth In this
~t2:?&.!1!T~jJ~f!:ititJ/jgtttfjjJt~~
2. ~:::~~~ffjq:~-rTZ:~'fj?,~~~:r:ii>~!f!~6~1 ~
___ ..~ _---1J:7r-f--y ~_u__~ - -- ----,,---~ IP:- -t"-~u-,
. ~t5:!1_T'\L_1/J"--P, ::~-rc}':I'-.jfre-~P(~~;~-7'iJr;;:o-- ~'?
3. ;.-~~~~~tI(< .,1f~~~~~~~~~~:---~
----:em/{ ~ .;;;'-~--~-i~e/--~~ce--~-:-
..-..~;.. .-...-..~'1-..V--.----'-' ZCTj---...':!t "~-~I,,,,uTd ... -":~:"rt~Lim........ cd:"";;:R;/'
4. ~;", t::t.11t:K#e:,,~~~:~lr~~J.('7~:;~rr-fw~:i-..-t:f
-. -t'!^1:t.!"Y-f!~4~-~~~"!1!/EdC-~--- ---75(,:': ii: ~
5. ~=~:!~~~~~~~!~!::i~~~::~~~~;et
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
obJectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted In this zoning district as minimum standard exlble standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic con n u Or e I s economic base by diversifying the loeal economy or by creating
JobS;
c. The development proposal accommodCltes the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing:
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment In an area that is characteri~ by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and reZoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
'__ ~cwj;?~~~~~i~~4:Ca24~------
... ._L~_; 2::f)~lLttdi;;lfH;~~-~~~-e?.;({-1fi;.-;7-e4<cf~------
.______..,...,... "...I;)J_______..,~-----........-......-.----.----,-.....T/[-'" -. .----.-...-.......-..-r-.-..--..-...,..--..---..-.....-.-.--.......-.--.......--..".---.-..-.-
a. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off.street parl<lng are JusUfled based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectlvea:
~The proposed development will not Impede the normal and orderly development and Improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
. permitted In this ZOl'llng dlstr1ct;
b. The proposed development compileS with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design. scale and Intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
l:J Changes In horizontal building planes;
CJ Use of architectural details such as columns, comices, string courses. pilasters, porticos, balconies. railings, awnings, etc.;
CJ Variety In materials, colQrs and textures;
CJ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
o Building stepbacks: and
CJ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The propo~elopment provides for. propriflte b:S, enhanced landscape deSlgnl/d app~prlate distan between bUlidlng)L
~-l iZJ.-~' qC '( _ -d~~ff~ ~ ,~-f-r".~<L : ~-~
t[,.?.fL "~fr' ~t- r @",e~(,_" c~_V ~.JYl ;a ~i..!Q ~~ . Tft7ff-re... ~
I,. ~Ji"':/] ,.
s;\F'lannlng epartrnent\A lication FormslDevelopment Revlew\2007 FOm'1slComprehensive Inflll Prole (Fl.D) 0A-24-01.% '~ '
0.:- (lofJ€t1.. t"l ( q~J .rfa rccy, ~~p81~ f'{~l7e-J.~fi1? ~S4~;)' c{4;40~/:4ef1!!.-L
B 11, eA . .!J. <P,. S! (5 '? €d F ....."'-<4'1 '-'- ()lJ( J;? ~:~<O~ 1(~.:/1 A ~
a..! ;fife 0 ~ r'I-J fYr., ~ '? f' , ?e"-'c v.>H J: J rl '-' ..,6/ LL /(
~Il b~y 7f-/#kc -f?6 Ci.) ..
RECEIVED 07/01/2008 11:57
JUL-01-2008 11:58 AM
7275352714
JOSEPH PERLMAN ESQ
P.05
E. STORMWATcR PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City Of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design CriterIa
Manual and 4~202.A.21)
!:J
!:J A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that Involvs addition
or modification of Impervious surface, inCluding buildings. must Include a stonnwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clea.rwater Storm Drainage Design Crltfllrla manual. A reduotion in impervious surfaca aras doas not ql,JOlllfy as an exemption to th\s requirement.
If a plan Is not r~d. the nW1~e :Jail prOV!d~n ~XPlanatlO~ Wh~ite i~ exemp~.- ld?v jJ ro v ~
Atam~I~~thedoR~k~~pL.Ar&a~kl~~ef~~ng: -rCcJ ~ t" ~. e vv 'f-t'gve.l,
existing toPOgraPh! extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading Including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and munlelpal storm systems:
Proposed stonnwater detentionlretentlOfl area Including top of bank. loe of slope and outlet control struoture;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan Induding all calCUlations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
proposed stormwaterdetentlonlretentJon area Including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control struoture;
SigMtura and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
lJ
Q
o
Q
!:J
!:J
!:J
Ll
COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prlQrto Issuance of City Building permit), if applicable
!:J
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above Is Included
Slormwater plan Is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and flnlshed floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APpLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FqR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding the$9 requirements, contactlhe City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code SectIon 4-202.A)
~ s,GNED AND SEALsO SURVEV 0'''''''", ...' ,_,lion" ,",,,rty) - 0.. ....,.., ." 14 'D';'"
!:J TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (D6H 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and Indicating trees to De removed)- please design around the existing trees;
!:J TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborlst', of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees; .
\:l LOCATION MAP OF tHE PROPERTY:
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request 10 make deviations to the parking standards (Ie, Reduce number of spaces)-
Prior to the submittal of this application. the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be In accordance with accepted trafflc engineering principles, The findings of the study will be used in determining wllether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
1;;1 GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
Q PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be Issued until evidence of recording a final plat Is provided);
o COpy OF RECORDED PI.AT. as appllGllble;
S:\Planning DeparlmentlApplioatlon Forms\Development Review\2007 Forrns\Comprehenslv8 Inflll Project (FI.D) 04-24-07,doc
Page" of 8
RECEIVED 07/01/2008 11:57
JUL-01-2008 11:59 AM
7275352714
JOSEPH PERLMAN ESQ
P.06
G, SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
I:J SITe PLAN With the following Information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet rBferenclng Individual sheets Ineluded in package:
North arrow;
Engineering bar SCllls (minimum scale one im~h equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions:
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and etructvres:
All required setbacks:
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles:
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, Including
description and locatlon of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, ate: Location of all pUblic and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site:
Location of existing public and private utilllles. Including fire hydrants. storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and 11ft stations. gas
and water lines;
All parlc:lng spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use Breas;
Depiction by shading or crosShatching of all required parlc:lng lot Interior landscaped areas:
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
(per Sec1lon 3-201(0)(1) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
L.oeallon of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities:
location of all outdoor lighting !lxtvres: and
location of all existIng and proposed sidewalks,
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, reQuired, and proposed development,ln written/tabular form:
EXISTING
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
Land area In square feet and aertl8:
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number or PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use:
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tsbular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, Indudlng all paved parking spaces & drtveways,
expressed In square feet & peroenlage of the paved vehicular 8rE1S;
Offlclal records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
CJ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (6 ~ X 11);
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVeR ONE ACRe. provide the following addltlonallnformatlon on site plan:
One-foot eontours or spot elevations on site;
Offslte elevations If raqulred to evaluate the proposed storrnwater management for the parcel:
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms:
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned):
Streets and drives (dimensioned):
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
S:\Planning DepartrnenMppllcatlon Forms\Oevelopment Review\2001 Forms\Comprehensive 11'11111 PrcJect (FL.D) 04-24-Q1.doc
Page 5 of 8
RECEIVED 07/01/2008 11:57
JUL-01-2008 12:00 PM
7275352714
JOSEPH PERLMAN ESQ
P.07
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4.1102.A)
Cl LANDSCA~E PLAN with the following Information (notto exCMd 24" x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and relentlon areas Ineludlng llwsles, side slopes and bottom elevatlons;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landScape buffer$;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas Including landscaping Islands and curbing:
Existing trees on-8lte and Immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including drip lines (as Indicated on required
tree &UIV8Y);
Location, size, and quantltles of all existing and proposed landscape matenals, Indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule:
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) Indicating the size, deserlp~on, specifications, quantllles, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, Including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including instructions, &011 mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protee~ve mellSures:
Interior landscaping areaS hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet <Ind
percentage covered:
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrlgatlon notes.
o ReOUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN 10 scale (8 Yz X 11)i
0" COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprenenelve Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Section 4-202.A.23)
o BUILOING ELEVATION OMWINGS - with the following information;
All aides of all buildings;
Dimensioned;
ColOrs (provide one full sized set of colored elevatlons);
Materials:
Sight visibility triangles;
CJ REDUCED BUILDING E:L~ATIONS - same as above to seale on 8 X. X 11,
J.' SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1808)
~.
.~ . All EXISTING freestandinll..flW attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensIons (area, height, etc,), Indicate whether they will bEl
( ...... removed or to remalrr{v diJ! ;e '''f.A.{,t/
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details Including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street addrEle& (numarals)
CJ Comprehensive Sign Program appllcatlon, as applicable (separate appllca~on and fee required),
o Reduced slgnage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
S;\Planning Department\ApplicaUon Fcrms\Development Review\2007 Fonns\Comprehensive Inflll Project (FI.D) 04-:;!4-01.doc
PlIge 6 of 8
RECEIVED 07/01/2008 11:57
JUL-01-2008 12:01 PM
7275352714
JOSEPH PERLMAN ESO
P.08
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-a01.C)
CJ Inelude if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway liS adopted In the Comprehensive Plan,
Will generate 100 Of more new vehicle directional trlps per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehlele trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or Intersection with flve (5) reportable accldents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that Is on the City's annual list of moet hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most reesnt edition of the Institute of TranspoQation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual,
The Traffic Impacl Study must be prepared In accordance with a "Seeping Melltlng" held with the Traffic Operallons Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562.4750)
Refer to SectiOn 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
Q Acknowledgement of traffic Impact study requirements (Applicant must Inllial one of thfil following);
Tr.offic Impact Study is Included. The study must include a summary !able of pre. and post-developmenllevels of service lor all
"~.'''"/'';' "....'--r-'. ....", roadway legs and each tuming movement at all Intersections identified in the Scoplng Meeting.
t?~..._,. Traffic Impect Study is not required.
CAUTION _ IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the CIty Public Wor1<.s Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562.
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY;
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a F1REO PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adeQuate water supply Is available and to determine If
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler. standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity, Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20. NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
CJ Acknowledgement of lire lIow calculations/water study requirements (Aj:lpllcant must initial one of the following);
,- Fire Flow Caleulatlons/Wster Study is ineluded.
itiZ.~=:'. Fire Flow CalculatlonslWater Study Is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements. contact the City Fire Preven~on Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, thll undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to vlsit and
photograph the property described in this application.
Q
~-'=--- . --------------
Signature of property owner or representative
>:,\.':'.;;;3~~t=~:-,-: }: :_"::- :~~:~,i3:}J
:-!;:: '_:-;,-:>:~;'.':,t,;'..s
S:\Planning DepartmenMppllcatlon Forms\Development Revlew\2007 Form&\Compret't~';~lv~.iniili ..~r()j8a{F-L.D)04~2:4-Ofd~~'
Page 7 of a
RECEIVED 07/01/2008 11:57
JUL-01-2008 12:01 PM
7275352714
JOSEPH PERLMAN ESQ
P.09
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1, provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT fl.l1I names:
2V (CC
...........'--...-................-.t7-...-....-.....-........._.._..._._.."....-........--..--.........-..,...".--n............
.....__.~._._._........ ...--...-....-............-........,....... -......-...... ..........-........ ,--...-...-........-- - - ....-...---.......-....,... .., . '.-"
..........__...__...__.~..,.........."",.,,..____.._...._....~....,..........M_____..........,.........--.----:................-.....-....,..-.--
......._...........____..._...__..._.........,..........,.....-...._.__....__._...__._...OM'.._....._.__._._...._.~-_......____....__.._.'..M
'''',....._.._.._._._~_.~_..,.."...............'_._.._.___Wl..-,' ..._...~-_............._._-_._--...-.._...~...,.,'....-.
---.........-.-.....----.--.-.... '''_...,..,---...~,.~._--_....__........_.._...__._._-_...._...,...
4,
T_h:{IJ~;~?~(i'~;;~.~~;~~;:~7e"'~:~')------- ___________
Th.'~~7';(;::r~.-r;.;:';~'C;$.'"..C~~ t€ u4 r-<tt':t ~
~--L~)(~f-;Jji~=Ze~~~Z.?~~~F====~=-======
That the undersigned (has/have) aplointe~d (does/dO) ,~POln~ .' '
._____._... ..._._...___....._.... ':16J_.~t1:~.-_f~... fe~.._.~.f..~,..-....-.._....-----..-.....".....-......-..-..-..---..".,...----.-... .....n_.
2,
3.
......._..._..______...... .. .._.___....._.,.....-~._---....................--_..--.._.....,..........___....._. ..._..._........_.......__....._____..._.h._'''.......-..---.-.-..........-.-~.............-.....-....--..--.
as (his/thelr) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition:
5. That this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property:
6. TMt site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application Jnd the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photogl'2ph the property described In this application;
7. That (1/we), the undersIgned authority, hereby certify that the foregOing 1& true and correct,
...._......_._..~__._~_fC:_.....-...... . .............-...........-...........-..... .",..-.-... ,.- ....
. .__~!' -~Pro::pe:~rty";:;er" . ...... . __.........__........._.......___.. .__..._..__.._..............._......~.......:.....-......:~~::rt~.~~nei...,.._~_...:._...-............_.....
-..:..-/-.. ~ Property own'fii .'- ..-. .--.-........-.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
.- ~ ~'i"""~.''''' " offt~","ly """"Iu",'" by~. "'" 1.~' SIBil-- 'to'!:ftkfi/(--- dOy '"
~!:~ ~:::-~:;, =:~::~~~~;::~.;:0f ......j"';' .", "" ,"Iy '~m
- /lit
My :mZ~",::.~!%.u~'~~-" . ._____u___
L/ --_............. -. - - .---.-----. .---..-......"..........---
Notary Seal/Stamp
$:\Planning DepartrnenllApplicatlon Fonns\Development Review\2007 Forms\Cornprehens1ve Inflll ~roJect (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Pageaof8 .
~~ -- - '~~-~-
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE NUMBER:
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 03/29/2006)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
:i:;:.:~: =ttm~~CE~~:BE~~~'frt -ff~
'c!! (LC
PROPERTY QWNER(S):
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
7~-J(~f, g~f~t:!::- ~~~~Z
7 2- ~ 11't (6 00 E-MAIL ADDRESS: -To e t"' r <>"'I-1"""l "'9~t7y.4.
o
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a.
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
.m.._..v_..___._.___._.....________.__._.___....__.___...__-.-----.--.---..----.---..~---.-.--.-----~.~...-.---_..--.-----.--....--.-------.---.--.-..--.-.--.-...-..--..
S:\Planning DepartmentlApplication Formsldeve/opment reviewl2006 FormslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc
Page 1 of 2
::::::::>-_ A
~"--~----- --
2. LIGHTING:
Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the
business is closed.
3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
o
~tc~ (rrl
~Ca tJ ~ (4;;, t/e
4. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
-r=- S fl-f,; c c, e
_.._~
5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS I ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
--.~_ i ./
{;';.2:Fi:~."","c'~3~'~':7'~:c~..':~;:,:," _..
;
i
/'
'-;en-- ------.-----
, representative /
!
~~~J_.<..
Signature ot'PloP
1,.1\#;'
.....> :o};,:~~:=~ ..~ :.: c.': ~....' .
S:\Planning Department\Appll(jati6"'~orr:rt$.\iiii~~t reView\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Landscape Program 2006. doc
. ". ""C~"'Pal1e"Zof2
I#: 2008015461 BK: 16120 PG: 1232, 01/16/2008 at 09:59 AM, RECORDING 2 PAGES
$18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDU20
./'0
\ This document prepared by and return to:
Joseph N. Perlman, Esq.
itO! Belcher Road South, Suite B
La~go. FL 33771
.~~ ,:
\, .....". .
..A..._....,_.~
\ ',./
ParcelIDNumber: 13 J 1. '11 1S;(tJ'Pfclo /2Jlo 10,&00
~~~d:;~s: f!7fo .'....'.::' ,/
.<.~,:",::~ QUIT CLAIM DEED
THIS IND~~;'made this Y day of JANUARY, 2008, between XEENA 0 INC the County of
PINELLAS, Stateo~ F~~rida, Grantor, anikLLC, whose address is 1420 COURT ST., CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
33756, Grantee. /' ,,',
"
.....\ ...... '"
..' -', .~
, J: " ._....
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum ofTen and No/lOO Dollars ($10.00), and
other good/aijd,.~~luable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged/hlili granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the
following~ribed land, situate, lying and being in the County of PINELLAS, State of Florida, to wit:
... ,,,",~. ..... "';'
/~.. ~,
, ,...,<.~ ",.:..,.-
SEE ATIACHED
. -. -.
:.. .....,.).0 have and to hold the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in
/ilnnv~e appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien and claim whatsoever of Grantor, either in law or
'e(l~Jty, for the use, benefit and profit of the said Grantee forever.
The property herein conveyed is NOT homestead property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has signed and sealed the day and year first above written.
:;62
OSAMA KHAZENDAR, PRES
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this r day of JANUARY, 2008 by OSAMA
KHAZENDAR, a married person, who is personally known to me or who produced identification in the form of
~p~
My commission expires:
11.111)
~-;-
JOSEPH N. PERLMAN
~w COMMISSION # DD 363635
EXPIRES: October 18, 2008
a~ded Tl:ro NC1;UY Public U,"\derwrifers
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16120 PG 1233
,:,"'" .....~ ;.
/..
~
.........,.,
'.
~. ,.
,..,............:..,
PINELLAS COUNTY FLR.
OFF.REC.BK 12002 PG 242S
~. \.. > ,;
.....,.., .f
/ "f ..."~~""""
""
'''--.,..",
...
,I '4,
{ "\.
/......:~:~. "\.
"
02-CXC
Clearwater. FL
.~ :~,.
\.. \..:'
:., \\ \
.,..,~.,~:.....~'... -.;-" .;.....+ ............~... )
That pa~ :o~ the Southeast 1/4 of ihti"~r\hwe.t 1/4 of Section
13, Townabip 29 South., Range 15 Bas<t~',...:U;C"ted according to the
plat,/c:i'f~.,PROPERn- OF A & H GLADS,..~IN~,,-! r,corded. in Plat Book
25 'i/ ~t;.p~ges 53 and 54, of ehe ,PUPti~'R8Cords of Pinellas
~~~r', "'.Plorida, and described ~a." f~i.~ow8 c
.' . 0,., ",_ ~ .... ;
~eg.i~ng in the North boundarY"'Qf'Gu1f-to-Bay Boulevard, at a
p,~l~twhich is 50.02 feet:. west aion~f said boundary from its
bitersection with the East boundary of said Southeast '1/4 of
/:NQt:thwest 1/4, and. runni~ 'tJ1enc;re, North 00 39' 47" West,
;..\ \pa,rallel to said EaBt bouh4ai'Y,/ 280 feet 1 thence west parallel
'-. "<:.to GUlf-to-Bay Boulevard..! 1'li.66/feet; thence South paraJ.lel to
the first: course 280 f~t....'t.Q,:U~1f-to-Bay BoulevardJ cheriee East
dong the North bounda2!?( .~~ s~a Boulevard, 144.66 feet to the
," Point of Beginning ....... '\ ,>' ,r','
.' .. " \
LESS AND BXCEPT thae""J?art<\pf the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest
1/" of said Sectiop'~:L,;3'~" lQ9ated according to the plat of
property of A & W/G:J.a:d4J'/'~Jno., as recorded in Plat Book :l5', at
pages 53 and 5~ I pf~ 't1i,e -)PUblic Records of Pinellas County,
Florida, and mo~\pil~loUlarly described as follows:
/ ......:~..., ;0'/
Beginning at ~ Nortlierly boundaxy of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at
a point whiclti ~,~s..o :~2 feet West along said boundary from its
intersection: \d.~' tb.li Basterly boundary of said Sou.theast: 1/4
of the Nort,~eat/1/4 and running thence North OD 39' 47" West,
para~lel t,O 'A~d'-'~asterly boundary, 150 feet to a point for a
Point of ~e,9~nn~lif1 thence continuing North OD 39' 47" West, on
said par~11...1/11ne, a distance of 130 feet to a point; thenee
North a90>",~2'\,53" West, a distance of 144.66 feet to a point;
thence ,.SO'l:itll O"!- 39' 47" Bast, a distance of 130 feet to a
pointi~.n.en"b.e...South S9D 22' 53" East, a distance of 144.66 feet
to t~ ~~irtJ: of Beginning.
....... :t '".,1 l
ALSO 't:Bss AND SXCEPT that part: conveyed to the State of Florida
byaee~;dated December 20, 1960, recorded December 22, 1960, in
Q!I'1'Clal"".Recorda Book 1063 page 439, of the Public Records of
,P'1,nel:~as"'County, Florida.
( "'<::~:~:''->'
<",~'"'' ,~);
"
......,.."'....'
....'" ".
FL USPSWD.DOC
~
os.