FLD2008-05014 - Staff Report - 1001 Ft Harrison Ave S
FLD2008-05014
1001 S FT HARRISON AVE
H RBOR OAKS PROFESSIONAL C R
PLANNER OF RECORD: R T
ATLAS # 295B
ZONING: C
LAND USE: CG
RECEIVED: 05/02/2008
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Addresses:
July 15, 2008
FLD2008-050 14
E.1.
SNKR I, LLC
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
1001-1009 S. Fort Harrison Avenue and 507-600 Magnolia Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
CURRENT ZONING:
Flexible Development approval for Office and Medical Clinic uses in the
Commercial (C) and Office (0) Districts with a reduction to the front
(north) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to building) and 7.5 feet (to off-
street parking), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 18.8
feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7
feet (to off-street parking) and a reduction to the side (south) setback from
10 feet to 6.5 feet (to off-street parking); and an increase in building height
from 25 feet to 45.16 feet as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project pursuant to Community Development Code Sections 2-704.C and
2-1004.C, and reductions to the perimeter buffers along Magnolia Drive
and the Pinellas Trail from 10 feet to 7.5 and 7 feet, respectively (to
proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
Commercial (C) District: south side of Magnolia Drive; and
Office (0) District: north side of Magnolia Drive
REQUEST:
CURRENT FUTURE LAND Commercial General (CG): south side of Magnolia Drive; and
USE CATEGORY: Residential/Office General (R/OG): north side of Magnolia Drive
PROPERTY USE:
Former Use: Retail Sales and Detached Dwelling
Proposed Use: Medical Clinic and Offices
EXISTING
SURROUNDING ZONING
AND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Commercial (C) and Office (0) Districts
Commercial (C) District
Institutional (1) District
Commercial (C) District
Offices
Medical Clinic
Off-Street Parking
Medical Clinic
Community Development Board - July 15,2008
FLD2008-05014 - Page 1
..
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 1.27 acre subject properties are located at the southeast comer of South Fort Harrison Avenue and
Magnolia Drive ( 1.13 acres), and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 350 east of South Fort
Harrison Avenue and adjacent to the west side of the Pinellas Trail (0.14 acres). The north parcel is zoned
Office (0) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential/Office General
(R/OG), while the south parcel is zoned Commercial (C) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan
designation of Commercial General (CG). The subject properties are presently vacant, but had previously
consisted of a retail sales and services use and a detached dwelling.
Development Proposal:
On May 2, 2008, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application was submitted for the
subject property. Under the development proposal 13,323 square feet of Medical Clinic and 5,100 square
feet of Office (18,423 square feet total) with associated off-street parking will be constructed on the
south portion of the subject property. An associated stormwater retention area with landscaping will be
constructed on the north portion of the subject property. The request had been made as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project as the proposed Medical Clinic use is only specifically authorized within
the Commercial (C) District as a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) use with no flexibility in required
setbacks or height and reduced setbacks to the building and pavement have been requested, as well as
additional building height.
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community
Development Code (CDC) is discussed below.
Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-701.1, within the CG Future Land Use Plan
category, the maximum allowable F.A.R. is 0.55; therefore the 1.13 acres is permitted a maximum of
27,072 square feet of gross floor area. The development proposal is for only 18,423 square feet (0.37
FAR); thus the proposal is in compliance with the above requirement. .
Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.I: Pursuant to CDc Section 2-701.1, within the CG Future Land Use
Plan category, the maximum allowable LS.R. is 0.95. As proposed, the development (south parcel) will
have an LS.R. of 0.71 and therefore meets the above requirement. There are no impervious surfaces on
the north parcel.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-704, within the C District, there is no applicable
maximum building height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. However, as a Flexible
Standard Development (FLS) use, medical clinics are permitted a height of 25 feet; and as a Flexible
Development (FLD) use, offices may be permitted a height of 50 feet.
The development proposes a building height of 45.16 feet from the average existing grade, which is
consistent with the established parameters for an office use, but not for a medical clinic. However, there
will be no difference in the outward appearance of the building based upon the use occupying that
portion of the building. As such, there should be no adverse affects in allowing the proposed building
height of 45 .16 feet for both the office and medical clinic portions of the building.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-704, within the C District, there are no applicable
minimum setbacks for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. However, the medical clinic and
office uses both have a minimum required front setback of 25 feet and side setback of 10 feet. The
development proposal includes the following reduced setback requests:
o Reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to building);
o Reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 7.5 feet (to off-street parking);
Community Development Board - July 15, 2008
FLD2008-05014 - Page 2
o Reduce the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 18.8 feet (to building);
o Reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7 feet (to off-street parking); and
o Reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 6.5 feet (to off-street parking).
The applicant has requested the reduced building setbacks, based upon the location of the ingress/egress
driveway at Magnolia Drive, which is dictated by its proximity to both South Fort Harrison Avenue and
the Pinellas Trail. In order to accommodate a building of sufficient size and provide for an adequate
vehicle stacking distance, the requested building setbacks are necessary. With regard to the reduced off-
street parking setbacks, these setbacks are necessary in order to provide for the construction of an
adequate parking lot. As the parking lot has two frontages, development meeting those minimum
setbacks would reduce the parking lot by approximately 30 spaces. While the reduced setbacks also
impact the required perimeter landscape buffer, sufficient area will still remain for a buffer meeting
minimum planting requirements to be established.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Sections 2-703 and 2-704, within the C District, medical
clinics and offices are required to provide three and four off-street parking spaces per 1,000 square feet
of gross floor area, respectively. Therefore, the proposed 13,323 square feet of medical clinic (40) and
the 5,100 square feet of office floor area (20) requires a total of 60 off-street parking spaces. As
proposed, a total of 63 off-street parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal exceeds
its parking requirement.
Solid Waste Containers and Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDc Section 3-201.D.l, all solid waste
containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely
screened from view from public streets and abutting properties by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or
vegetation.
The proposed architectural elevations denote that all of the mechanical equipment is to be located on the
roof and screened from view. However, no plans have been provided with this submittal that depict the
locations of the mechanical equipment on the roof and the means by which they would be screened from
view. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits,
the plans are revised to clearly depict the locations of and the means by which all mechanical equipment
will be screened from view from public streets and abutting properties.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, shall be
installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is attached as a condition of
approval that prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy all on-site utility facilities, whether they be
existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site.
Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.l, where non-residential uses are adjacent to a local
street right-of-way, a ten-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer is required. The development proposal is
adjacent to Magnolia Drive (north) and the Pinellas Trail (east); however buffer widths of only 7.5 and 7
feet, respectively have been proposed.
Based upon the above, the applicant has requested the approval of a Comprehensive Landscape Program
with the above referenced reductions to the perimeter landscape buffers.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-I202.G, the landscaping requirements
contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive
Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the
development proposal with those criteria:
Community Development Board - July 15, 2008
FLD2008-05014 - Page 3
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed
on the parcel proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X
automatically controlled so that the lighting is tumed off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the X
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is located.
The reduced widths of the northern and eastern perimeter landscape buffers from 10 feet to 7.5 and 7
feet, respectively, will not be to the detriment of the site, nor will it negatively impact the adjacent right-
of-way. The buffer will contain the trees and hedge material required by the Code, as well as additional
groundcovers and shrubs far in excess of minimum requirements; thus resulting in a demonstrably more
attractive landscape plan. Further, the proposed landscape will have a beneficial impact on surrounding
property and will enhance the community character.
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There is no outstanding Code Enforcement Issue associated with the any of the individual subject
properties.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria
as per cDC Section 2-704:
Standard Pro Dosed Consistent Inconsistent
F.A.R. 0.55 0.37 X
Maximum 50 feet 45.16 feet X
Building Height
Minimum Setbacks Front (north): 25 feet 17.5 feet (to building) Xl
7.5 (to pavement)
Front (east): 25 feet 7 feet (to pavement) Xl
Front (west): 25 feet 18.8 feet (to building) Xl
Side (south): 10 feet 6.5 feet (to pavement) Xl
Minimum Medical Clinic (3/1,000 SF GFA): 39.96 63 parking spaces X
Off-Street Parking Office (4/1,000 SF GFA) 20.4 (3.41/1,000 GFA)
Total: 60.36
See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks.
Community Development Board - July 15, 2008
FLD2008-05014 - Page 4
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as
per CDc Section 2-704.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
I. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of
a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
o Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornIces, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
o Variety in materials, colors and textures;
o Distinctive fenestration pattems;
o Building stepbacks; and
o Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Community Development Board - July 15, 2008
FLD2008-05014 - Page 5
X
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per CDc Section 3-913.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meeting of June 5, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward
to the Community Development Board (CDB).
Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and
requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to
support the following findings of fact:
I. That the 1.27 acre subj ect property is located at the southeast comer of South Fort Harrison Avenue and
Magnolia Drive (1.13 acres), and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 350 east of South
Fort Harrison Avenue and adjacent to the west side ofthe Pinellas Trail (0.14 acres);
2. That the north portion of the subject property is located within the Office (0) District and the
Residential/Office General (R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category and will consist only of a
stormwater retention area and landscaping; and
3. That the south portion of the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the
Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category and will consist of 18,423 square feet of
medical clinic and office uses.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Maximum Development
Potential standards as per CDC Sections 2-701.1 and 2-1001.1;
2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and
Criteria as per CDC Sections 2-704 and 2-1004;
3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Sections 2-704.c and 2-1004.c; and
4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for
Level Two Approvals as per CDc Section 3-913.A.
Based upon the above and subject to the attached conditions, the Planning Department recommends
APPROV AL of the Flexible Development approval for Office and Medical Clinic uses in the Commercial
(C) and Office (0) Districts with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to
Community Development Board - July 15, 2008
FLD2008-05014 - Page 6
building) and 7.5 feet (to off-street parking), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 18.8 feet
(to building), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7 feet (to off-street parking) and a
reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 6.5 feet (to off-street parking); and an increase in
building height from 25 feet to 45.16 feet as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to
Community Development Code Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.C, and reductions to the perimeter buffers
along Magnolia Drive and the Pinellas Trail from 10 feet to 7.5 and 7 feet, respectively (to proposed
pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Community Development
Code Section 3-1202.G.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence of filing a Unity of Title with Pinellas
County between all parcels involved in the application must be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Department;
2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding comments of the Engineering
Department shall be addressed;
3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding comments of the Fire Department
shall be addressed;
4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any outstanding Land Resource comments shall be
addressed;
5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans are revised to clearly depict the locations
of and the means by which all mechanical equipment will be screened from view from public streets
and abutting properties;
6. That prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they
be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site;
7. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the
construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the
building to which they are attached, as applicable;
8. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated
with the design of the buiiding with regard to proportion, coior, materiai and finish as part of a final
sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes:
(a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font
style and size; and
(b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the
colors, materials and architectural style of the building; and
9. That the final design and color of the building shall be consistent with the architectural elevations
submitted to (or as modified by) the cDB, and be approved by Staff.
/---- .... .,7! / -: 1
Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ..:J..-:t!f~~If-' /
Robert G. Tefft, Planner ill
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases I Up for the next CDBIFt Harrison Ave S 1001 - Harbor Oaks Professional Or 2008
07-15 RT1Ft Harrison Ave S 1001 - Staff Report 2008 07-15.doc
Community Development Board - July 15, 2008
FLD2008-05014 - Page 7
Robert G. Tefft
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4539
robert.tefft@mvcleanvater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
. Planner III
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present
Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
. Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005
Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
. Senior Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text
amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports.
Make presentations to various City Boards.
. Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its
display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the
Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance.
. Assistant Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications.
Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications,
ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other
professionals and the public.
EDUCATION
. Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999
LICENSES & CERTIFICATES
. American Planning Association
Community Development Board - July 15,2008
FLD2008-05014 - Page 8
,
~
PJNE
D " Crescent
~ g :D
DRUID RD I W
PROJECT
SITE
w
(!)
Z
<(
a:::
o
PINE
ST
DRUID
>-
<(
CD
PATH
(J')
Cl
..J
o
Z
>-
w
0:::
z
I~
<(
I~
JEFFORDS
DD
GRANO CENTRAL
ODD
LOCATION MAP
Owner: SNKR I, LLC
RD
o
LO
ST
Dw
~
Case: FLD2008-050 14
Site: 1001-1009 S. Fort Harrison Avenue
507-600 Magnolia Drive
PIN: 15-29-15-54450-034-0010
15-29-15-54450-034-0030
15-29-15-54450-034-0090
15-29-15-54450-034-0110
15-29-15-54450-032-0240
Property Size: 1.27 acres
Atlas Page: 295B
"
,
AERIAL MAP
Owner: SNKR I, LLC
Case: FLD2008-050 14
Site: 1001-1009 S. Fort Harrison Avenue
507-600 Magnolia Drive
Property Size: 1.27 acres
PIN: 15-29-15-54450-034-0010
15-29-15-54450-034-0030
15-29-15-54450-034-0090
15-29-15-54450-034-0110
15-29-15-54450-032-0240
Atlas Page: 295B
I
.:
~ 5 ~ 41509 <: 1--___ -^.
~~ ...,J 83729 I ~
L ~J 83~ 42513 ~ I
900 54~ '<:( 84130
84j 43517 0 I
54~ It 845 31 I "t ~
36 84~ 44 521 0 ..;.
54'$7 In 84932 I
34 851'\ 24 45 525 It 1 I 2
~ ~ 85333 - --
902 ......-~ 0 I
905 ( 3)~ S3Js l4 85734 I
0)906 3 I I - -
I I ~
--.....- I 24 (
907 6 I 8 2/
I I
69 67 4
I I G) ~
------- Q 23
908 I
- I I ~
~ '"
Ol\ '" '" '"
909 I ill f6 f6
!
~ MAGNOLIA DR
,Mn, ~ '<:( as
<:
I ~O 0 I I
~ I
I It 1 I I I
'" ....
It C 1001 lil I lil I I
I 1000 ~ --------
I I I 507 I I
I 1002 .... 11 I
I It 2 I I
70 I 68 ~ I
I 10 I 9 1 2 I
I I CI) I I I
I 7 I
I
I I 1040 1009 3 I I ---/t---,
I I I I I I
I 10~ I 103 I I I I I
I I 4 I 6 I 7 I 8 22 I 21 I
507
I I W~ Q I I I
------- ~
I I 34 I I I I
'" 1046
I \f I 5 I I I
I I I I I
-------~--------- ----'---
LOTUS ATH
~
I IRT I
ZONING MAP
Owner: SNKR I, LLC
Case: FLD2008-050 14
Site: 1001-1009 S. Fort Harrison Avenue
507-600 Magnolia Drive
Property Size: 1 .27 acres
PIN: 15-29-15-54450-034-0010
15-29-15-54450-034-0030
15-29-15-54450-034-0090
15-29- 15-54450-034-0 110
15-29-15-54450-032-0240
Atlas Page: 295B
\
'l
I <<5 5 ... 4.p09 ~
~ ~ -----
L ffiJ 5~ .,J 83729 I
I 8311 4251~ ::.::
RITAIL 900 ITACHH ~ 84130 I ~
q; ~I\l
a.a 435\') WELLING 0 I
SA~ES & 845 31 ~ .
B4 44 521 ~ It: I 1 ~
36 SERYI~ 0
s.r.n co 84932 I
8511 24 45525 It: 1 I 2
I Sjji ~ 85333 - - -
902 ~ I
J 905 5~ ~4 85734
(~3 )) I
I 8906 3 I I - - -
I I J A
I ---- I (i) 24 ( 2~~
907 I 6 I 8
69 I 67 I I I
I bFFICLE I I ~
-------- 23
I 908 I
I I I I
v '"
909 ;:Ii :5 i ~ '"
I I I on :&
~
tl3 q; 2 MAGNOLIA DR
~
0
I I to. ~ I
I !;1 It: I
I It: 1 I
R FrAIL ~ on I to.
1001 :5 :5 I
I I 1'0'0'0 I
SI ... ------- I
I ~ES &1002 It: I 507
I 70SE ~YI~ ~ 2 11 I I
I 10 9 I
C/) I 1 2
I I
I I I 'O7
I I
I I 104'0 1009 3 I I -O~F =s:r~EET-
I I PARKING
I I
I 10~ A"TIrA~ED I I I I
I 4 I 6 I 7 I 8 22 I 21
1'055 507
I DWELLINGS ----~~~Q I I
I I I I I
C) 1046
!;1 I I
I I I
I I I I I
-------~--------- ----1---
LOTUS PA TH
It)
(0
I I I -. \ 1
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: SNKR I, LLC Case: FLD2008-050 1 4
Site: 1001-1009 S. Fort Harrison Avenue Property Size: 1.27 acres
507 -600 Magnolia Drive
PIN: 15-29-15-54450-034-0010 Atlas Page: 295B
15- 29- 15-54450-034-0030
15-29-15-54450-034-0090
15-29-15-54450-034-0110
15-29-15-54450-032-0240
I-
I
J
Looking south from Magnolia Drive at subject property
(near Ft. Harrison Avenue intersection)
Looking south from Magnolia Drive at subject property
~
._;)~>-,......,c.,
Loo ing sout~east from Magnolia-Drive at adjacent
property (off-street parking) to the east
L ___ .
LooKing nortn across Magnolia Drive at nort
nearby development.
""
1 001 and 1 009 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue I 507 and 600 Magnolia Drive
FLD2008-05014
Northside
<aif'tetYi'ti4!t<::t- SeltQ.tr:(~4i tJr;u",
I' /'
Civil
Land PI,lIllling
Due Diligcmce Reports
Re-Zoning, Llnd Use. Annexation
StOI"llTWau;'!" r1,1tlagellH:;nt
I.)ulit.y lJcsign
lIaffic
Construction Adrnillistration
June 10, 2008
Mr. Robert Tefft
Planner III
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: FLD2008-05014
1001 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
DRC Response
NES #731
Dear Mr. Tefft:
Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on June 5,
2008.
General EDl!ineerine:
(Prior to Issuance of Building Permit)
1. - 13. All items acknowledged; all required revisions will be provided on plans
prior to submitting for building permit.
Fire
1. A yard FDC has been located a minimum of 15' from the building, please see
revised C4.1.
2. Hydrant has been located along Magnolia, just west of the driveway, please see
revised C4.1.
3. Please see revised C4.1; 2 Y:z" Siamese connection provided.
4. After meeting with Inspector James Keller on 6.10.08 it was determined
additional hydrant not required; please see additional existing FHA located
approx. 115' south of site.
5. See revised plans 30' turning radius provided at all entrances and exits.
Land Resources
1. East/West and North/South section provided on revised sheet C4.1 for Tree #30
which is being preserved not Tree #31.
P.O. Box 4948
Cltlarwatel~ Fl 33758.4948
tech(fl)north sideengin eer! ng. c om
727 443 2869 Fax 727 44(; 8036
Landscaoin2
1. Please see revised landscape plan with the bald cypress relocated.
2. Please see revised landscape plan providing Ilex V omitoria within island.
3. Please see revised Comprehensive Landscape Application to include a deviation
to the buffer along the Pinellas Trail.
4. Landscape plan has been revised to provide the correct number of trees; please
see revised plan.
5. Palms will remain where not in conflict with the new 4' wide sidewalk.
6. Please see revised plan for improved spacing of trees and note below.
Note: Per Ron Belko (ISA Certified Arborist) All trees shown are spaced
appropriately for their growth habits, Oaks which have a decurrent growth habit are
spaced at 35' o.c. The Bald Cypress are spaced closer but the growth habits for the
cypress are ex current and more appropriate for the locations selected. The Cassia,
Iles, Crepe Myrtle, and Ligustrum are accent trees and have been located due to their
close proximity to existing trees or pavement. If the remains questions to the growth
habits of the trees selected or the design please contact Ron Belko at 727-409-8532.
Parks and Recreation
1. Site Data Table has been revised to include 6,659 sq ft of building area previously
on site. We also hereby acknowledge, open space impact fees are due prior to
issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first for
sites over an acre of land.
Stormwater
(Prior to Issuance of Building Permit)
1. Approved SWFWMD permit will be provided upon receipt.
2. - 9. All items acknowledged; all required revisions will be provided on plans
prior to submitting for building permit.
Solid Waste
1. Arborist has directed clear trunk to 14' in height; Tree Preservation Plan reflects
this information; please see revised Sheet CS.2 for dumpster detail.
Traffic En2ineerin2
1. Please see revised stacking distance; as per your direction, dimensions changed
from 18' to 19'.
2. Additional sight visibility triangle provided at the Pinellas Trail, in addition to
revisions to the landscape plan to address this triangle.
3. Please see revised drive through lanes, as per your direction, dimensions revised
to 10' from edge of curb to edge of curb.
4. Scaled passenger vehicle revised to 7' as per your direction.
5. The by-pass lane will allow by-pass activity at a certain point; it is not intended to
allow all cars access at all times.
6. Vertical "clear" height of the ceiling over drive thru area provided on civil sheet
C3.1 and architects plan, providing 12'6" clear heights as per discussions at DRC
(no fire access required).
7. Meeting held with Himanshu Patina and Robert Pergolizzi on June 5, 2008; all
items related to this item address in meeting.
8. As per discussion and suggestion at DRC, handicap spaces intended to service the
medical clinic have been relocated to allow improved accessibility, revision
resolved conflict with the loading zone.
General Notes: Items 1. and 2. Acknowledged.
Plannin2:
1. Please see revised narrative.
2. Please see revised narrative and Comprehensive Landscape narrative to address
the deviations along the Pinellas Trail.
3. The irregular shape of the property was actually pointed out by a fellow Planning
Dept. staff member in a previous review of the project; I assumed
acknowledgement of a hardship associated with the shape of the land would not
change based upon the Planner assigned to the project. If the parcel were truly
rectangular, three of the requested setback deviations would not be require; we
believe the irregular shape of the land provides additional justifiable hardship.
4. See revised Architectural sheet A2.2 providing a rated tenant separation.
5. As per your request the tree wells have been deleted from the design, please see
revised civil and landscape plans.
6. Please see revised civil plans which now correctly depict the east property line
abutting the Pinellas Trail as a "front" yard.
7. Please see the revised civil plans providing a reduced sidewalk dimension along
Magnolia and Ft. Harrison as per your request.
8. A/C Units roof mounted and shielded as per Code, please see revised
Architectural plans.
9. Please see revised plans for corrected height of bldg to peak of roof, midpoint and
parapet.
10. Please see lighting plan provided by Architect.
11. Please see revised civil plans which provide the proposed setback of dumpster
from the northeast comer to the east property line as per your request.
12. As per our discussions at DRC the handicap spaces intended to service the
medical clinic have been relocated and the conflict has been resolved, please see
revised plans. Additionally, as per our conversation, the loading zone has been
reduced to 28' in length, creating a zone large enough to allow box truck size
delivery vehicles which are the typical size of delivery vehicles for the proposed
uses on site.
13. The A TM machine location has not yet been determined, the final financial
institution taking occupancy will have specific requirements associated with the
A TM machine, the business plan of the occupying bank will dictate the location
of the A TM machine; it is our intent to meet any code requirements in
association with the A TM location.
14. Acknowledged, prior to issuance of any building permits the required Unity of
Title will be provided to and approved by the Plmming Dept.
15. Acknowledged, all available utilities will be installed underground.
16. Please see revised landscape plan which provides a more intense buffer to better
and more effectively shield dumpster enclosure as per your request, additional
planting proposed to accomplish adequate shielding.
I trust you will find this information sufficient to allow placement on the Community
Development Board Agenda. However, should you require additional information or
clarification, please feel free to contact me and I will respond immediately to any
additional information required.
Thank you for your kind and professional assistance.
Sincerely,
Renee Ruggiero,
Project Planner
NES #731 DRC response 6.11.08 RMR/rmr
cc: NES File 731
"
; Clearwater
u~
~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
o SUBMIT FIRE PREll MARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIOf~
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 04/24/2007)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
_ SN]5R I, LLC, a Florid~~imiteQ..Li~QiIity-~ompan}l
_ 181_~!i~i!Ith Care DriY~L.Trinit}l, FL 33655
FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL:
--~_._-----_._----_._---_.._-------.-_._---------_._.------_._---~_.,----_.,--
~1i~b..1J::1.9, a Florid~l:imit~sl LiabUi!Lg.Q~Q.~I}Y~___
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
---------~_._~------------------------_.__.__.._-
~_~~elch~E__~oa~L_~;t.~i'l:E:"at.€:.1CL~~_~!.?~______._.
727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036
727-235-8475 EMAIL: J~e..;~:t:do.gd~ki~. f;(j~"("~b f)
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: Harbor Oaks Professional Ctr. PROJECT VALUATION: $ 3, 000,000
STREET ADDRESS 1001 S. Ft Harrison, Clearwater, FL
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 15/29/15/54450/032/0240; 15/29/15/54450/034/0010; 0030; 0090
-
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 1. 27 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 55,295
----" -.- -
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See -,
..
PROPOSED USE(S): Medical CliniC/Office and Bank
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See attached
- -
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
[J{ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
See attached
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See attached
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
See attached
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See attached
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See attached
----~-------'-----------_.__.._-~-_....__._-------------------'---.--+----------.--.--....-....----.-.----------.--.-.---..-.-..-...-.-.--.......
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
See attached
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 2 of8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
See attached
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
See attached
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
See attached
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
See attached
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
See attached
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
o Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
o Variety in materials, colors and textures;
o Distinctive fenestration patterns;
o Building stepbacks; and
o Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
See attached
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
[]{ A STORMWA TER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
B
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
QI:
[]{
IZ
ClI:
[]{
rj
At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
[]{
a
o
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
a
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
RMR
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
[][ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
QI: TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
I:2f TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arbor/st", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees;
OC LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
OC GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a tinal plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:\Documents and Settings\derekJergusonIDesktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
QI: SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
X Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
X North arrow;
X Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
X All dimensions;
X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
X Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
X All required setbacks;
--K_ All existing and proposed points of access;
X All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
_~ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
---...ll Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
_X and water lines;
__x.. All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
X Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
X {per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
X Location of all landscape material;
X Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water ,management facilities;
X Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
X Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
X Land area in square feet and acres;
_lL Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
X Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
X Gross floor area devoted to each use;
X Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
X expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
X easement;
X Building and structure heights;
X Impermeable surface ratio (LS.R); and
X Floor area ratio (FAR) for all nonresidential uses.
EXISTING
~eELCl.J__
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
ex REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11);
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additionai information on site plan:
X One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
X
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
X Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
X Streets and drives (dimensioned);
_lL
X
X Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Settings\derekJergusonIDesktop\planningforms_0707IComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-'1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
_.lL
X
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
X Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking .areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
X tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
X schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
X existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
X protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
X percentage covered;
X Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
X Irrigation notes.
X
X
X
Cl: REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11);
[)( COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
[J[ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information;
~ All sides of all buildings;
X Dimensioned;
X Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
X Materials;
X Sight visibility triangles;
rn
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 Y, X 11.
J.
SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT
o
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
o
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
o
Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o
Reduced signage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:IDocuments and SettingslderekJergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_0707lComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manuai.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
o Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
RMR
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Mee\ing.-:-gr,HdLI.t wI f0:.;."u..s
Traffic Impact Study is not required. 6uJ.~:'......
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULA TIONSI WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
o Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
RMR
Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is included.
Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in t is application are true and accurate to the best of my
kn ledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
ph tograph the property described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEl-LAS
rn to and subscribed before me this ( day of
, A.D. 2~ to me and/or by
L , who is personally known has
~ ~/J. .. A. WILLIAMS
~ MY COMMISSION # DO
~ . 010
~ t EXPIRES: October 14, 2
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehe siv~'f1llff Proiect (FW~J(~~iln\1oo:>c. Co
Page 7 of 8 1-800-3-NOTAI'lY
~
produced 4-
~:~fi~~tiO~. t~~~
~NOt~
My commission ex .
Signature of property owner or representative
Apr 1 b U5 U;1:Ubp t:ityllstlG Ueslgn Uevelope
tJ"'f' ......., .(..tHJO JO...J.. t rt..'......o'O\:I..;JO
(L 1 4 (~bZ:l;j
p.L
I "lUf'\ 'f 1.,;JI.&. uc. r.::.."u j;JV,",~
rHOc.. tJLI u.c.
13J
N. AFFIDAvtT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
,. f'rovide names 011111 !lfOPeIW ownel'i on 1Il'ed - PRINT fulll'ltlmetL
smrn:t, LLC
2. TML (\ IIrWwe fJT1!)lhe owner(&) amI ~ title rtcldll1"(s) 0( ltKlloll~ dacri1Hld pru~rty (address llI' general location):
1001 S. Ft. H.~rieont ~e4rwa~er
3. ThIIt this pr01)e r1V aIIl:ltil:4r1R the propeny for wtIich a r&q\Jll!St lor a: (dl!w1be feCl'Jetl)
comp~eben&ive ~n-fill RedevelQpmene ~p~lioation has been submitte~ to redevelop the sits
with Medi~al Clinic, Office and a~nk uses.
ol.il -..,.. + -.' I..... ~...I'J_, J.
~. ~ ". u~ (huIhllvellllPMlIed and (docslllO) SP;lolnt
"o~~nv~de Engineorin9 a~~ice8, Inc.
liS (t1is1thetr) aoent(S) to elCllCUle any petitions Of' ether dOaJmetllt nlC8Sll8ry III alflc;lllUch petition:
S. 111'1 "'Is arridavil ".. bllel1 IIlIll.lCV\l!!d hllnduGe the City of CtHIW:lIIer. FIorlcll to COfl!llder 8/'111 act on the atlcwe de$ct1bed property;
e. That site vNitt to 1M pruperty IIt'I neCl!SS8ry by City ~p~ in OtCler ID pnK;ell' the lJpplicaliO" end lt1e r:wmeT' 8UII1orlleB Cfty
~nlaliwll La utllt 9nd phDloQmph the prClPf111Y tf180ribed In W. 'pj)karlon:
7,
That ~,,!.~8 ~1lI~d ~. ~ oelli!k: thlltle Jore9OiI1Q Is true ,ocI oorred.
JL. V V VV~" f~ \ r;~Arlr
F'ropertyOWl1et' C. fJ . . C SfYKR '/ L L~)
F'ro /l'Fty Owner
F"toptrly OWner
Property OWner
STATE OF FLORIDA.
COUNTY OF PlNELJ.AS
sef<<e 1110 tll(!llEtdentlfil~. en ollicer duly comml69oned by 1I1e !awl> of /tie St_ 01 Flclriilll. on II1ls
ffpr, " / . (.f-.DOk' personaIlyappe8rvd RlltJd,jVJ d. )v<(/)tUl+
OSPOIlfS am sa)', ItIat hllfshe N11y urnftrstarm the COfItelllB Of tile dlllvillhal heIsf1e 3Igned,
~'t~'fit, JEAN MARIE MCINTYRE-HAUSHALTER
l'f . ~;" MY COMMISSION * DO 728840
ii EXPIRES: November 7,2011
" Bonded Thru Notary PubHc UndelWrlter.
/ 7 +-~ dsyol
wIlo h8'fil'lg bel!n first dlAy ewom
~V~ ~?-'tA.-i ?tl:/{!Jc~, >AJl~~jLJk
Nobly Pl,lbl~ Sl~wre
My ConmSSlon EJrf)ires: 11- 7- d- 0 I )
Notary Se81/Slartlfl
C:'DocumenlO and Se.Ing$\dell!".fer9u.onlO9l:lclop\plMr1ingfo<mR_01O~mhenliYe In1ill PAljIet1 (FLD} 04-~4"{)7 .doc
JI.e ore
APR 2 2 2000
I~~.~"~' ;~;;~';;;;:';~~~~;';~I; A~'~ NT~--'~-~"~"""'='-~"-="~""""'~ .~_~""W~.,,_~..,~,."__'~,.,~.,,~~".='~===.,~~
1. l'r')'.,ide n~llIes 01 "II plOpefly owners on deed - Pf:INl filii flam"s
:>i Il(l, [I( r,LC
2. "fhal (I arniwe are) the owner(G} and reeord title holder(s) of the following described propmt\' (JrJdress or flGt18ral location):
1001 S. Ft. Harrison. Clearwater
:l. Thai this property consti[utes tile properly for 'Nllidll a request tor a: (describe request)
.21.,. DOO sqnare foot medir;al office j medioal cli.nic wit'h ".i.'l~e i.nlprovementf3
4, Thai the Ilnd8rsi(lnad (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Nortbsic1e 13n':Jinearing Se:r:-v.ices J Tuc"
as (hls/lhei!") ?(lont($) (0 el((')(:ute any petiilons or olhHr documents necessary to affeGt slid) petillon;
I), Thallllls affidavit has been 6xmmted to induce- the City of Clearwaler, F'loricla to wnsider and ad on t11f1 above <:Jesmibed property;
fj.
Thai ,;ile visits to the propeliy are necassar\' by City fepresenlativ8s in order tf) prOG8sstllis appllcallof) and tile owner autlwrizes Cily
representatives II) visit and pho!ograpl, the properly dHsr:ribed in this application;
-r.
Th<ll (lAve), the iJl'lderSrIJ.l'llld f,tlthorill." hereb)' cerlify thallhe fOl'(l!Joll1g lslwe and 7;;7 / /'
.74vJJ1-t/ MyC,. ~~ ....
PiC,perty Own"r f'rol>orly Owner
Properw Own"..
Properly OWner
STilt 1"1:: OF FL.OmD.A,
COlINr'\' CW PINELUel,S
BMM0 me the undersigned, an oHic<>r duly commissioned by tha laws of th~ St,;;;:?of Florid", olllllls
~ ,2tJ17 pan;rm~lIy ~Wa~j"erl .. ~AtJ'/LUL ~
DBpO&e$ and $ays that hB/shelully understands the c:ontii'nls of tile affidavit that he/sl
lU
day of
who Imvlng been firsl duly sworn
Notar)' Seal/Stamp
I
,
I
I
I
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee
(agent Name)
with Nonhside Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for
SNRKI, Inc.
(Property Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and
approvals for the construction on the property generally located at
1001 S. Ft. Harrison, Clearwater, Florida
(Property Location)
PINELLAS County, State of FLORIDA.
"~~
Signature of Property Owner
-->0 ~~.4 u./(..
Address of Property Owner
~"'" /lA A 5'?/t.lt
City/State/Zip Code
~!M;v' ~fT~
Print Name of Property Owner
Title ~
?3.7'-'8'Pf'IIY?
Telephone ~umber
State of
day
a.
The foregoing Instrument was aCknow~efore me this ~
Ahdtu'20rl,b~ ,as ~
who is personally known to me or who has produced
, ::....\\\\,,\\\~I~~III/~as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
~ ~ \.... ". C""~
~ ~ ..~v.\SSIOty; . ~"A~
:".;: 0 . 0'" "c.r", . :#7' %
~ .. G ",-uer 2[) ~. ~=.:::c::
.:::z: ~. -l QJ\" J _"l (<\ ., ::::::..
.;::: ~~ "OUl.:::::
== . $- o. *=
=*. CfJ _e- ill
~ ~.. ~ #DD454243,l. ~iS:flature)
~ i? .""", ., .,' .~ ="
~? . ~~;, CIolJdedw ~'I;j. <::) ~
~ f1>L. -/~suranc. ~rfJ' . (>v'~ ..
~ r A . . . . . . ~"' ~mmlssl
~ 'lJSL/C Slt\1\. \) -#
'1//1111/ 11I1 \ \ \ "'\\'\
(SEAL ABOVE)
County of
Notary Public
(Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect
FLD2008-050 14
1001 S. Fort Harrison
Harbor Oaks Professional Center
NES Project # 731
June 13,2008
Description of Request: To construct a two story commercial development, containing a
medical clinic and office uses with following the reductions or variances:
. Buildinl!
Front (North)
Front (West)
Reqd: 25'
Reqd: 25'
Reqst: 17.50'
Reqst: 18.80'
Pavement
Front (North)
Side (South)
Side (South)
Side (East)
Reqd: 25' Reqst: 7.5' (to Parking)
Reqd: 10' Reqst: 6.0' (to Sidewalk)
Reqd: 10' Reqst: 6.5' (to Parking)
Reqd: 10' Reqst: 7.0' (to Parking)
Heil!ht
Allowable - Office: 25'-50'
Allowable .. Medical Clinic: 25'
Proposed:
32' 2-1/2" (Top of parapet)
4l' 6-1/2" (Mid-point of roof)
45' 4-1/2" (Roof peak)
Also, reductions to the required landscape buffers through a Comprehensive Landscape
Application to allow the following:
Landscave Buffers
Front (North)
Front (East)
Reqd: 10'
Reqd: 10'
Reqst: 7.5'
Req st: 7'
General Applicable Standards (Section 3-913(A) :
1. The portion of the project which will contain the building and parking is zoned "c"
and allows a F.A.R of 0.55, respectively the project is proposed in general
conformance with these standards. The proposed development will be in harmony
with the character of the adjacent developments and the surrounding area which hosts
a mixture of similar commercial and medical offices. The building setbacks that we
are proposing exceed the neighboring building located to the North on Magnolia
which has a zero front setback along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue and the newly approved
Harbor Oaks townhome project with a front building setback off S. Ft. Harrison of
only 10'.
1
The proposed two story development will be consistent with the adjacent propelties
in scale and bulk; the surrounding and adjacent properties are comprised of one and
two story developments very similar in scale and bulk as the proposed development.
2. The proposed site design, height and building design will be compatible and
consistent with the new developments in the area in addition to blending well with
the older existing built environment.
3. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the values
as redevelopment of this site will promote investment and encourage further
redevelopment of the surrounding land and buildings. The current assessed value of
the vacant land is $ 1,760,000 with a projected value of construction of over
$4,000,000 providing improved land values to the surrounding sites, and increased
assessment to the City of Clearwater.
4. No health or safety issues are anticipated with the proposed development; the
proposed uses are compatible with the commercial corridor, comply with the existing
zoning, are appropriate and similar with adjacent developments, and will not create
any negative effects on the sUlTounding properties. The redevelopment plan includes
responsible site drainage; fully landscaped yards and a new building which meets
current building code and FEMA requirements to further improve the heath and
safety of the surrounding community.
5. The development plan provides single vehicular access to the site and is located
along the secondary street, Magnolia Drive; the primary vehicular egress for the site
is also located along Magnolia Drive. Negative affects are further mitigated by
providing only the bank drive thru egress onto Ft. Harrison; a formal Traffic Impact
Study has been provided and offers further discussion related to vehicular mitigation,
safety and traffic congestion.
6. The immediate vicinity is currently characterized by mixed land use patterns; the
proposed mixture of medical clinic and office uses including a bank will be
consistent with the community character and will provide additional commercial
support to the surrounding area. The proposed development uses and urban design
elements are consistent with the desires for the area; the design will blend beautifully
with the community character and will provide further enhancement and SUPPOlt to
the surrounding environment.
7. No adverse effects associated with visual, acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation
are anticipated as these items are addressed and minimized through appropriate and
responsible design. The design, number and location of driveways; the proposed
mixture of uses and the architectural design of the building together with the
proposed hours of operation (Monday - Friday 8am-5pm) all play a patt in
accomplishing minimalization of any anticipated adverse effect.
2
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. The following items make the site very difficult to develop without deviations:
a. The irregular shape of the parcel, having narrow lot width at points makes
the site more difficult to develop without deviations; with a truly rectangular
parcel three of the requested deviations would not be necessary.
b. Contributing to the difficulty of developing without deviations is the fact that
the site has three yards that are considered "front" requiring a larger setback
for the north, east and west yards.
c. Provide an access point along Magnolia that is appropriately distanced from
the intersection of Magnolia and Ft. Harrison, together with the objective to
maintain appropriate access spacing from the Pinellas Trail, the location of
the access drive and parking layout is somewhat predetermined for this site.
2 The uses proposed, the site and architectural design are in conformance with the
goals and policies of the comprehensive plan, as well as the purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of the code; the proposed uses, design and function are
appropriate for the neighborhood and surrounding community.
3 The project, as proposed will not impede the normal and orderly development of the
improvement of surrounding the properties. The project is expected to improve, not
impair value of the property and the adjacent properties. Further, the location of the
development, uniquely situated adjacent to the Pinellas Trail, will result in the
improvement of approximately l35 linear feet of the Pinellas Trail boundary with
professionally designed landscaping, providing rewards and benefit to the entire
community.
4 Adjoining properties will not suffer detriment as a result of this development; the
development of this vacant property will increase property values for the surrounding
area. The projects location within a "hospital area" with such close proximity the
hospital complex will only offer support the community and provide new additional
employment opportunities. With the proposed mixture of uses, together with the site
and architectural design, no negative impacts are anticipated.
5. The immediate vicinity is currently characterized by mixed land use pattern; the
proposed mixture of office and medical clinic uses will be consistent with the
community character and will provide the desired commercial support to the
surrounding area. The proposed development uses and design elements are consistent
with the desires for the area and will blend beautifully with the community character,
providing further enhancement and support to the surrounding environment. The
proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible
standard and flexible development use.
6. Re-development of the subject property is in close accordance with the goals,
policies, and objectives of the City of Clearwater and will continue to upgrade the
area.
3
a. Practical development of this property requires deviations from development
standards for setbacks and buffers primarily due to the irregular shaped lot.
The proposed setbacks, design and use are consistent and compatible with
the newly approved Harbor Oaks town home project in addition to many of
the other surrounding developments. The proposed development will not
impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of
surrounding properties in anyway. This proposed development will further
promote the positive redevelopment pattern of the area.
b. There are no adopted applicable design guidelines for this area.
c. The proposed development and design supports the established character of
development (commercial, office, medical clinic uses) along this stretch of S.
Ft. Harrison Avenue with many existing developments having reductions to
building setbacks, and landscape buffers.
d. In response to the desired design elements provided within the Development
Code, we offer the following: Harbor Oaks is a mixed-use development
which is architecturally influenced by the designs of old Florida. This style
of architecture provides many opportunities in building form as well as
material selection. Horizontal building plans undulate as the standing seam
metal roofs break up the parapets. Wooden trellises shade the first floor
fayade creating dramatic shadows. Old Florida details and materials, such as
long overhangs, brackets supporting the roof, Bahama style shutters, coral
stone, and a standing seam metal roof tie the building to the past.
Fenestration patterns become tall and narrow in the corner towers adding
elegance while drawing ones eyes up to the long brackets supporting the
roof. Building setbacks fall within the requirements creating a public space
around the building. The design and scale of the project integrates into the
surrounding community and offers a unique influence of the past
incorporating many of the design elements described within the Development
Code.
e. The proposed development plan provides appropriate buffers and distance
between buildings, with professionally designed landscaped yards, featuring
four tiers of plantings along much of Ft. Harrison and three tiers of planting
along Magnolia Drive. Although minimal deviations for the setback to
pavement and the dumpster are being requested along the Pinellas Trail much
of this yard actually meets the requirement; the lot line is angled creating this
additional variance request. Additional landscaping has been included in the
design to provide the desired buffering.
The proposed plan offers trees in excess of the minimum required by code
with all available open space on the larger site being planted with a multitude
of varieties, textures and colors of plantings. The proposed development will
benefit the community character and property values, above and beyond the
required development standards.
NES 731 - 1001- S. Ft. Harrison - RMRlrmrrevised 6.13.08
4
\j'\(/
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
KENT RUNNELLS, P.A.
101 MAIN STREET, SUiTE A
SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695
PH: (727) 726-2728
'KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT
PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA
INST# 200727630508/2012007 at 01:57 PM
OFF REC BK: 15942 PG: 1401-1403
DocType:DEED RECORDING: $27.00
o DOC STAMP: $9275.00
>.
[SPACE ABOVE LINE FOIl RECORDING DATAl
Vi ARR ANT Y . PEED
". ""-'- ,
TI-IIS INDENTURE, made this 1L day of J ul/ ,2007, between Fulvio DiVelIo,
as Trustee of the Ft. Harrison Property Land Trust, dated ][)ecember 30,2005, whose address
is 400 Islal1dway, No. 703, Clearwater, Florida 33767, Grantor (herein called "First Party"), and,
SNKR I, LLC, a Florida limited,Iiability company, whose address is 1815 Health Care Drive,
Trinity, FL 34655, Grantee (herein called "Second Party").
WITNESSETH, that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS and other good and valuable considerations, to it in hand paid, the reoeipt whereof
is hereby aclmowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and transferred, and by these presents does
grant, bargain, sell and transfer unto the said party of the second part and his heirs and assigns
forever, all that certain parcel ofland lying and being in the County of Pin ell as, and State of Florida,
to wit:
Legal Descdption: Exhibit "A" attached
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, with everypdvilege,
right, title, interest and estate, dower and right of dower, reversion, remainder and easement thereto
belonging or in anywise appertaining: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever.
And the said party of the first part covenants with the said party of the second part that it is
lawfully seized of the said premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, save and except for all
covenants and restrictions of record; that celiain mortgage originally filed in Official Records Book
14143, Page 9230, of the Public Records of Pine lIas County, Florida', in favor ofFifih Third Bank,
and subsequently assigned to Synovus Bank lof Tampa Bay in Official Records Book 15828, Page
1305, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, having a currenLprincipal balance of
$780,000.00, which mortgage and balance grantee herein, by acceptance of this deed, hereby
3$SLlrneS and expressly agrees to pay; and taxes for the current year, and that it has good right and
lawful authority to sell the same; and that the said party ofthe first part does hereby fully warrant the
title to the said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
II Wxpwbllll IrtllIllellsplllf'onnsLegllIIClienlsIDiVello, f'ulvio - Fori Harrison SalelDeedWllrranly.SNKR Idoc.doc
Page 1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has hereunto set its hand and seal
the clay and year above written,
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVEHJW
IN OUR PRESENCE:
~:GZ~
Print Name '. " E nUNN~
~//~/
PrinlNam /if;{J'iJJWb}~
Ft. Harrison Property Land Trust,
dateel December 30, 2005
/:fM4rf,tv /~ '~~
By: Fulvio DiV clIo, Trustee
Print Name
Print Name
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
,.-
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this J 7 day of U
2007, by Fltlvio 'DiV clIo, as Trustee of the Ft. Harrison Property Land Trust dated eccmbcr
30, 2005, who is personalIylmown to me or who has produced
identification and who did take' an oath.
(seal)
Notary Public Jtate of Florida
My Commission Expires
O. ' 1Me- ;v7Y1J
~"~"~- '" """""".~~---.,.-"".",,,
,~y fJl~. MARY O. MANEST AR .'
!?r;hY~.:~ MY COMMISSION * 00 508212 I
~~j?i EXPIRES: Fooruary 3,2010
I . "~'~:~~!;::;;:~~i~~~_~=~,~::~~~~.~~~~;~~,~v,
EXHIBIT" A"
Lot 24, Block 32, and Lots 1,2,3,9 and 10 and 50 foot strip of vacated Railroad Right of way
on East, and Lot 11, Block 34j Magnolia Park, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded
in Plat Book 3, Page(s) 43, Public Records of Pin ell as County, Florida.
~
29
SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP
FLORIDA
LOCA TED
PINELLAS
IN
COUNTY,
~
0...
........."
,,-.....
W l.!.-
........."
=>z
20
w
>
<to:::
2
o
if)
=
I-
D:::D:::
0:::0
<:(l.!.-
u.J
0::
-,
>-
co
~
0...
o
N
'::t
o
("")
r--
o
o
N
J'i
ci5
OJ
3:
'D
r--
o
L[')
r-
eo
L(")
o
I
I-
0.::
o
l.!.-
r-
L(")
o
OJ
:5:
"t;l
-c
o
(j)
'C
'-
ro
I
t
o
U.
'D
C
ro
ro
o
c
OJ
ro
::2:
L[')
o
L[')
o
en
o
o
N
(j)
U
iJ)
E
0...
.,...,
c
CD
-I
(:)
(j)
0:::
<(
I
I
I-
::>
o
if)
Is'::;005
):: 3~,.b5
J
.)",35,72
-: 35.87
~"
w
iii:
;;
,3: .)1; 36.01
'.,
~-'
'/3605
"':36.23
Rog@rs $t
r-
~ !.
~: ~
'" '"
'$.!
Q
.(1
0..
'."
,.
:".J.
Turner St
'"
.~
"'"
,., .
o DI\lld R~W
JUt'llirtl/
fl,hgn"jia !)r
LtI!U"!il r>"th
Jeffr.,rds SI
,
<J
"-I
~).
.j;:
'"
."
o
'"
;:-h
..
ct:
Wa1ldn~ Pd
'"
".
\Q
Coe Rd
1200 m
11000ft
a'~\. Q; I,; 'r ,:;
VICINITY
MAP
.<35.91
.'
SANITARY MANHOLE
RIM EL = 35.24
___ W INV. EL =31.86
./' N INV. EL = 31.83
E ItN EL = 31.86
S. INII. EL = 31.83
,34.83
34.55
c:+.w
'NY
l><J
3 . 4 34.88
wv/:M I
c' "" "'%'. . u_.. "H:~ '. ...
\..-Ih,,_..,<- "
j/ 34 7& ~ 35.21 ~
. I A: .. .35.61'
! ./ ' , 35 58
fRC1/2'"
LB 6168
"1 ><35.50
.01
'lel
. ~
<l
35.3:2...
. . '\35.63
)'
"
D.,
...
'"
3539 !
o
o
.
'tN
<.04
~.
V,35 40
~
~
<1
. "
35:43 35:39
354\
35'58
""
-....J
~ 3~543o:: ~
to j;
A
~
. ::
X35.50
3550
6' PALM
35.14
;;:
'<t-
o{)
35.54
, .
<1
35,70
'<36.24
~,q~
\(
nkl/2'"
35.30
ilff
. -
37~:;.<'~_
./ __ 137.59
)<37.04 - 18' OAK
35.73 -
*36,96 .-//
, ~POND-
, V'34,8!
35.55
35.69
I
I
/
il
>::
Z
<(
en
u..
(:-,
u.
o
>-
,3498
36.30
{:i7 02
35.AO
/
FLUME /
Honold C't
Pint S~\
Dtuid Rei E
(SI~E
~(
11)
t
',,",
'!'
:i
...
'"
2
l:"~J
E
.,
:J:
A S.j
4':~ 8
E El
NOT TO SCALE
C\1-I1A1
(JhW
.
-~--------
.
SOUTH,
RANGE
15
EAST,
l'
J
''0
'"
'"
~
t';
,.,
d!
')e,uldSt
BI"'VI'nell St
w
N f'."Ill :it
S Pin&!3'i
~
:;
""
c
.~
W
:;.t
"-
{J
,:1
Gland C!?!lt,~1 31
PiMII~~ SI
Tusi-awillil ~,t
'f ~'lI\il''<i11l ~ (),
J,' _:: ~. .~
LJI,&vi!?'fii F'd
tr-:1"'j,
Nf.:.viTEO
;. 35,08
34,56
Y.34,79
34.50
_._~-_._-
F
nHW ~"S15d
'- <J .d
4
OHW
.
. ,,35,24
I
4
135'(P)
'-< 35.20
BROKEN /
/...- ASPHAL T
"
(
\
~:~_.n____
35.37
BLOCK 34
LOT
135'(P)
--
,35.60
BLOO: 34
LOT
2
).:.: 35.50
13~S'(P)
BLOCK 34
LOT
3
:' 36,]0
135'(P)
37,01
--"( 36, 75
W ....37'!3
\-
3' 01 \
-4$''''-89051 ' 2 1 "
I 36,98
, 14' PALM
!
'<::,,34.90
37.51
-'
-'
<(
3<
<.:>
Z
Z
;;'
I-
W
0::
j...
ci
3708 i
>(37.38
" ]7 :'5
~~7.l3)3' .14
3515~.
<35.16
BLOCh 34
LOT
4
38.J2., ~
,
"
-"/37.77
_- ASPHALT PA.R,IN1~~~
. :,-' 162
:<8.12 ,
(f'
, :1'.. ,- S'~::,g'.!-' I. - ...: ..:;- ~;-, . .: {; ~.._ '" II"l $<~ ~ I'Tl^ 'I ~..' ;'''; I'~~J~~ \
!_ L. ~--;,.. ._....J _,~, ~ H < : ;; ...' ~ ~_ I ~ L, ~I..{ " -:: I a
I I' 0 t-"',., .. ~. \..\ F 1-" - 'j
" ',"'.q 'IZ"... ..r---.'~l. "--,- t"b'} 4 ~';' I"" "I'
i i '''"....,'';-.;:;.,.......,I..C I ~. . ~ ~ ..::!!' C;~)t 1~, : '. I I :.' ,.:' >I' I
", -;;:, '~":--~--"Jl,:g ~ (~i::-~'--:~ ,.ti1- ~J.5t021~ ~ -rt2"Ol"'-"-'8"-~u;-: I
'."", w.,.,""" :;'~.:; '''-~.''.::.-'---.O.l:'. '''. ,~~ "1~ .,J;1:..' R lC~;~.~~ .n. /, '.1
~:...~_.... j ~ t _ ~~_ _ _ _ ".',;: x HAll'OlD c; ~ :: n j _ t N : ., I : : ~; \
. (_:~' ;1 - L, --.~~'h: :1";;-1 ~f~;\"" .... : ; - i : : : : "I
" ;:~ ~'=7. I' let It, "1"'r'.': :::',~-:. I~l; .... .1~', .._:._._,_~:;~,-...J.-l
-. '. t. i l-,-,-!-.J"-"'~~.l._' .'::=.. : "" ,... '0'.' ~ "iIlEET 1. r---;;;C-:--~-'J I
.~;;~,!~:'\~'l. [1/ !:l'~.~~ p._~"'.'~ .,~ ~ :'"': rn":"-; ";"; ~II
--~ _-1; ~: _ ... .". - ~~4.-' : L'./ '.. :ll:5"$1-t,t;1 I ::: 1 I ~ : ~ ::!,~
:.....,.;-.'.'H<;:'.r.<~. .' , "',,,,,,. '.J- "1_"'-1 " I 'l;1'~.'.1' 4 i I., '.)' ,.,.~i--<
~'::F7OO"1 ;.", -, ;: 3 : .:, r, : ,:-; 'I: ~ "I" : : : ,~ Ii: : ~.,: j=i
_. I ~: :: j ~-". l~ ~ :./ ':]' -, ' ~'~~ .. '~i .;"1. ~ l~ :. r-:-} "-7-~-:r~
. I ' : 'I: "'''i- ... :;ft'7.tt~.. '<"." rr.<' ' I' t ]1l.t1 I' b)': j-1
I '".,' -:=: ..' "~~I!l \ ~; 1.8~, I~) ''1 :,J ~ 10 :.~.: !: ': ~;" I
~: :, I ~. 1(, J ::j,--I _ ''\ [l'T!".1 ~' ': .: _ 7' r-"'7'~.. 1 1 .....6.,. ~ ~I '::1 ;.' j < ~ . .~\ f
I .~ .- ," "j:i. :'~I-" ~~~'., 9<5:." "t'. - I .' L "J I
- I; I -1' ;. ['"'"' ~j 1 .....-v~~ .~ L.- -. :._.~ .- - : : - j f ~: ~. : : I
'c..,~_L:'>..~_, _:~_,.!::'~.-"~ '" ~.~ "" ~"" .". C ' n~L.L_!,_,~,".L-l_~~
- (~:.:::>I 2 .. ROAD:p. ~ ~
j e~lrF~~ J~Tz-t\fj; ~\~~:~ "II~ I '~:~.SC IT.T~~ ~ ~}~:11
;,f~li'f-; _: 'j iiill. --.0_" """ 6I...l__,~.___:__,: ~U
:t~r,',~t:~ -= -'1 ~'1.1I ~.< ,...V~ " f'"..S!. 'flU "5,1-:;::): /18
'i'.i"~l- -1~ ~___~.4~n ;'! .....t,~... _ r--~~-l I~ ,~:3:J:):':S,: [I
~L:.L:'.", : '.'_:J ,:' '" ~ r", to:.' 'ii : 1 ~ 1..!=5:Q_J: ~ :{ri,_i.__ :'l'~j,,_: : "of
~ :-_~- -. I ~ ~~ t~ : . ...,......: l; [A~IA~~_<:r~2....~.
-:-T:--;Ol~ i~'-! L '~'4',~" ::' .';-, . i 'k.r ~\, \
~ p,,,,',r. ''';0 ..[ "'J- _,Z. ~ ,i 2.; ", :,', : ,\ I
: ~;~ ~ l~h}}"-; ::: =-__~r,~ ~p-~ ., ~\;:'.' !;1 ".4 - rr;:":"I .. -^ I
: "1,,, 1>- I' 1 ... .T,. 9 ..O' -~ -:,~ I,' ;--" : i2..~=: : t..~,
::> p, J ,(... vI", ..;~-_ ...___->
~~'" ---:._~-~ or-'7,-.J~-'_I' ", 4; :Ii.yi::. ;,,:.,',;.\ :. :.: ;:~I
, , I G' I" "..,:. / ~ '" 0 , 'w'" " I ,.v". , I'~ I '. "'I ' ." " , "I')j
'. "I (~:,';i :i, ,'=1: i,i oq-- -. . : i~ I' . 'Ii :'j :,~ : ,~r 'I'
j l:'~ '''"..~~. 'h "l\ 't'''!!::-:l. "..::..:>., '*1..\ ....! "I ,..~ ! ~"'"',.).'" .
'J -~1~~~ "-"-'--';~IOI';r-_L_-,__J._-----'
.-"~.' ::;"~1 ~'~':.~c~-:':,\ 'rGs~;~~F~-:: Irl::;~-T~r;:'c'~~-"ll
i , ""n " ~~ l ~ 1" . ~ , .."..-"".. """"".. '., 7 ' 0 ' T lor I , ' , ' I [;<'<' j , , ' , \ j
J~,.,;_ IL~ll L.,~; ',::< : : +-f~cL~"~'i~g~:'~'~'I'''~~~f :": ~i:
:'~'C'1:t' '-' l~ "':7.^:C\.",',:,':.:'"....,',",.,,,,<r~!,~..,' -I- ~
~~ '~.-",- ~ ~. ~:C :,:.~,r".~ ~ ~_~~) : .i:\ ,::\:;~~~.~~J~)~~.~_~,~_.~! :;i! . ;;,~~. ". ~ ~ J~ l~ ~ f~:} Ii
, ' . r d ~ \'" . '--" T,..,....l r.-.,.. l ,-.,,,<--1 I
. 1, ~ . I ':; ~ 1":; ~~ 6 r ~ '" ... ), l I . . . ~
I I I , r Jl"tl..'l.!'t ';. \ 1 , ~ "'I I ' I" ;' \ 'I
':Y'l 1 ""-"I ,\ <:---: ~ ry "--1 ~ , ~ 0, \' " ., .' . l . , I - I
, ' I (' ~l : . ...... '1 :: \. I" 1 . J " ,. r" '.. , ',.~. I ' , " 1
- ,r .:~' (~';:i:~'" .' ~b\: : -:' :' r--,'~~' \_L~~~ I:
, '" I, 'I, I r: ", ,~-<\,,--,., \-'> ,. 10)' .,. '7.'.'" i' ,-, '" ". . , I
c:~:J,.~): :"J t :_~::.c.::'~< ..J L,t ~,,;_~__~~~_ ,,!~__~~~_.~.~..t~ 'j
s..
If)
/.0')
f::l
r.
""
c.
"
('3:'
c
):' 35.24
~7,
rn
T A X
MAP
NOT TO SCALE
<3506
-::34,72
>04 "8
2'CURB & GUTTER (ASPHALT COVERS PORTION OF CURB)
., 34.48
34.43' "
L I
A
34.44
o
A
L L
D R
E N
IV
(p)
E
(F)
MAG N
STORM MANHOLE
RIM EL = 34.76
34."6 -(,.Lll'N.rL::: 3M2.
,D.
- to"DIP
~
,.34,63
(22' ASPHALT)
-,>;.}4.74
~
()
2'CURB &: GUTTER
. ~
.:J .
. 4
'34,86
'I.!L
~
~
"
j
/
1-
-1,
334.60'
..
? (3'5.17
~ 4_
8 go 51 ' 21 "
E
N
3'5,32
16' OA~
50'(P)
~:f~\533
UNkl.lOVN
'v 35.0D
50'(P)
><34,7D
/35.60
.;)35.49
I
I
I
CL
~\
I
.~ 36.22
036' OAk
-"\ ~~;810M:
\V~.r
35.13
I 3~, 08 ""'-
35,55'--' .......35.15
PALM CLlIS1EP 4-':' 3552 _-x .' \,
'. '\' ,870 \
,y' .,',3'514
, . 35.41,.. . '. ________ DIRT PILES
_ PLATTED LOT LINE (TYP) _ ~\ ,'39,24 /t~54~547
3560' ') X39'8 ,~_3S...27
3'5.44 \
10,."0 /"'36.10,. '<.37'3,\
"V 36"l I
o 'L' 3"l~' ;,; 39,24 ,,39.40 I ,
3_,50 '., ..:0'.".4 /3~'Ot
35,55:' ~ ,----~;'5.24
, ..." 35.25
I;:;;, 35.62 35.5? 35,22
or,
,.)
BLOCK 34
LOT
10
35,B5
W48'OA~
\,......' ><35-50
(.~\ ~~'.1!fAj{
~~
r-<'35.30
r~560
I~
PLA TTED LOT LINE (TYP)
~\
.".
or,
I
I
I
tC5r4
1 1
J
~
~:~
:::;I~
3 .-
~I
I
I
I
I
VAC~NT
3:,.47
~~ALM CLUSTEP 4-5
"<35,60 I
~"I
"'
FRC 1/2"
L8#f)16B
50'(f")
50'(P)
":35.70
J:,.)
'<35,70
LARGE
TRANSFORMER
'{'....
i '0-
:".37,,;r-0
37.8.5
"
.0 7' PET^INING WIl,LL
8 go 51 '21 "
w
w
s
I
I
. ~h,I'9
FIR5,8"
N=lQ 6'
W=/J 7'
..
~ ..
otO
01'0
."
r---.,OO
NO
o
o
o
if)
3744
~- ..~~.. -
4~
BLOU 34 '04.95
LOT
7
3765
35 08 ~.
3754
PE TEllTION /.
F')I'.:C' -"
':~'3'5Jl
BLOlY 7,4
LOr
6 !
I
3737
"K
"'.--
j 37,88
~37 971 35. 0 ~
-- -
--
-
12"PVC _
--
-
,,~.
-
--
" .
. '
.,
"
iJ72'5
GRATE INLET
GRATE EL = 371'7
IN" EL = yo, 41)
I
\
-~/
38.09 A
/
.'
3".43
PLAN TER
AREA
",,- I '
.~.
.<'....
~'>'....
<>,,-
('
'.-
_1,
1 STORY WOQD FRftME
COMMERCiAL BUILDINC,
FINISHED FLOOR
ELE \iAT1{)N "" 38.2 3
37.91
~(J7 .?~
.
.01
'"
J(
Ji! /'" INVERT s
N /
35.39
34,30 ,,-
r
\
\
'"
Z
~1
())I
~
Cl,
0,
1-1
!
INVERT EL = 32,52-l..
2'CURB
U34.43
~~'-'I' CURB INLET
_ RIM EL = 34.92
N INV EL - 3212
46 4'(P ~
34."0 ...k.
lS'PAU< . 'lIIii
30.46
')(3577
\
~35,20
\
\
\
J:
()
I-
15
t:>
Z
F
III
x
W
S':t
>Cl5.00X35,23
8
N
""
o
>-
a
c
o
n
If.
w
11:
<(
>
z
o
F
<(
>
w
-'
w
i
o
0::
<.:'
~ *-35,90
o
"-
z
<(
I!J
...
o
Cl,
o
>-
:I'
o
t::
o
I!J
i-
i
a.
()
Cr:
~____ END OF PIPE
NOT FOUND
"
.4 "
<l
",,'35.40
\
\ 35,18
9.10' OAI'
\ ':3520
31.r;03~I' 35.J6
~. ,6'OAK
':.-_f.7
-" 35,B6
~ l",PALM
35,75
'l6'OAI'
@
'X,35.40
'"
~\
~
~,\
35 70 ~
\(
BL OCK 34
LOT
9
-" 35.3'
~PALM CLUSTEP "8
:.57'(P)
38,28
10'OAk
\
;;;\
>-
~\
I
\
\
\
> 3S.99
\,'-:36,10
3785 "'f'-- -
'-x:-. _' _,.,__ .-.,... --,' , ~"l1l:~,,_
3820 20 6 . 43
-'J'376':'
BLOC,: 34
LOT
8
;.(,37,62
"..' 37 b5
"<:37.53
',' 3763
:,::~
'. 3729
,...,
'...'-.,
,--
\
IT'~ 3802
, ,~/.b I
\
i
\
37.64:-. \
1/
v:e.29
,:;PA TE INLET
GRATE EL = 371;
.- :371"?
PARCEL 44/012
VACATED
RIGHT -OF -WA Y
>:' 36.03
>::
z
<(
CD
"'-
o
0.
o
I-
-X 35,50
3200
X34.18
X33,%
.
~
4'
><36,38
><34,77
BLOCK .32
LOT
1
><
BLOCK 32
LOT
2
~I
z
o
Q;;
0,
X34,60
N
89.48' 45"
46.05'
E
:':/'.~" \
LB16168 \
\
,
\
\rz
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
\
34.03 >d,
,33
FCM4"x4"
LBJII6707
PRM X35,42
'"'
<.0
N
.
LO
tI')
~
X3S,35
34,B8-
X30"
)(]5,11
<.0
N
.
LO
tI')
~
~
;"
,..,
..--
BLOCK 32
LOT
23
'"'
'"'
N
LO
..
'"
N
o
,.-
><35.4B
BLOCI< 32
LOT
24
.eo
;"
""
w
o
z
FRC1/2'"
LBI2865
E=4.S'
S-03'
VACANT
(NO TREES)
::
to
tI')
..)(
CO
o
o
o
o
3477
)<34 99
(j)
o
o
o
34,80
FRC1/2"
LBf6168
34,37
FIR! /2"
W=O,5'
N=0,3'
3'5,04 ~
mCl/2"
LBIf6168
s
w
FRel/2"
LB#Q168
i I
i'
, ,
: \~
g II
ffi 1\
~ 1\
33,70
)("
"
~
\
I
\
*33.85
\
~
I
\
I
I
\
I
I
"
I
,
,
I
\
I
I
I
\
,
:*33,71
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 20 ft.
<(
0:::
I-
I-
U1ti
:::<
<(!
>-
..J
~1
il.
U)
~<(
w
z
33.75
o
,
iCl,
I"
Iw
\
\
J
I
GRAPHIC
SCALE
40
j
80
~
CL
>1:33.44
o
\
o :0
\
i
BOLLARDS
.<~. (TYPIC Il,L)
~\
wi
!
-+
\
I I 3255
,,___- "_._,,.Ei~_____-- ~:~*._-_.-- -,,-~. --",,-
-~_._-~-_._-~--_.--~_._~.--
'n.21
X32,98
X33,27
-- ..., , ) ~
4
'.01
34.70 X
35,86 ...ift
12' PALM ~
36.31 ...ift
12' PAUl . ~
36.30 -"
l6' PALM;r-
~J6,71
-,... 14' PALM
~ 36,78
.,.. - 12' PALM
, '"'
\~ w i)(
S 'i \
I~ ,
\ . ~ \!
I LO ~ \i
\tI')
1..--
\
\ ....
\ \
\~\\
I"
:\\
I-
Z
w
;:i
~ o:::\~
~ 1\
~ I-\~
\ \ \
\~ U1 ~.
I \ 1\
',.. <( \ 1"'-
I'"' i 10
iN ~\l""
IN 'x
I.. !
iN ~\\
'10 ,',
1. wi'
it/) i x
\0 Zl,\
iZ \'i
I -Ix
I
3671 -" /
11' PALM~ /
,/
..----: VACATED ~
// RIGHT-OF-WAY -" 3660
/ 36.49 ~
( ". ,~"
36,55 *
8' PALM
~ 36,5S
12' PALM
WESTt;RL Y
CL! \
! i
I'
\ \
,
:, x
......-)f 38,07
i
i
60' RAILROADJYW
PLAT
cl
~
.
4
4
.
.
,
-~ -...,....-- --.,0(
~- -r------,~
3 eLF
''''~34.24
',(33.65
BLOCK 35
LOT
1
>/34.59
/.34,00
',-
.....
..... '
~ EAST 10' OF RAILROAD R/W (PLAT)
11
i i
36.90
:<
*3641
i
I
FRC1/2"
L81616B
I 37,7] 3779
''''-~---X--137,65
I
I
'-(3739
" 37.44
!
i
)1::37.73
I
,
\
I
I
~: n86
1. THIS IS A BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVlEY, IT'S PRIMARY PURPOSE IS TO DOCUMENT THE PERIMETER OF THE
DESCRIBED LANDS BY ESTABLISHING OR REESTAIBlISHING CORNERS AND LOCATING IMPROVEMENTS AND TO DOCUMENT
SELECTED NATURAL AND ARTlFICIAL FEATURES IOF THE SITE SURFACE TO DETERMINE HORiZONTAL AND VERTICAL SPATlAL
RELA TIONS.
2,) THIS SURVEY COMPUES WITH THE FLORIDA IMINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS (61G17-6 FLORIDA ADMINlSTRATIVE CODE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUlTES) AND IS NOT INTENDED TO MEET A NATIONAL STANDARD.
3.) SURVEY DONE IN CONJUNCTlON WITH TITLE ICOMMITMENT 1(-2904139, DATED 7-9-2007, ISSUED BY KENT B,
RUNNELLS, P.A, & ATIORNEY'S TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC;
THE SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO THE FOlLOV\1NG:
A,) RESERVATIONS IN FAVOR Of THE STATE OF FLORIDA PER DEED BOOK 894, PAGE 16.
4,) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR IMP'LY OWNERSHIP.
5.) THE BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. THE BEAR:ING REFERENCE LINE IS WEST LINE OF BLOCK 34, BEING NOO'08'36"'W.
NORTH ARROW IS BASED ON THE BEARING STRUCTURE.
6.) SUBSURF>\CE AND ENVIRONMENTAl CONDITI01NS WERE NOT SURVEYED OR EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS
SURVEY. NO EVlDENCE OR STATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONDITlONS,
CONTAINERS OR FACILITIES THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT Of THIS PROPERTY.
7,) IT IS THE OPINION OF THIS SURVEYOR THAT THE SUBJECT PROPER1Y APPEARS TO BE II'J FLOOD ZONE "x'" IN
ACCORDANCE WITH F,I.R.M, MAP H 12103C0108lH, PINELLAS COUNTT, FLORIDP ~ECT!VE' 5-17-05,
8,) ELEVATIONS BASED PINELAS COUNTY BENCHIMARK HSTAMPED HARRIS "X", ,ATIO'. = 0, DATUM BASED ON NORTH
AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM t988,
9,) CERTIFICATION IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
10) COPYRIGHT" LIl.ND PRECISION CORPORATIOIN, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS DRAWING MII.Y BE REPRODUCED
BY PHOTOCOPYING, RECORDING OR BY ANY OTHiER MEANS, OR STORED, PROCESSED OR TPA..NSMITIED IN OR BY ANY
COMPUTER OR OTHER SYSTEMS WITHOUT THE PIRIOR WRITIEN PERMISSION OF THE SUFVE', OP. COPIES OF THIS PLAN
WITHOUT AN ORIGINAL SIGNI'TURE AND IMPRESSION SEAL ARE NOT VALID
11 \ DIMENSION WITH "TiE" DENOTES MEASUREMIENT FROM BUILDING FOUNDATION TO PROPERTY LINE
\x
36.41 '
--l.:.\-
N/F i \
\ I
II \
','34.94
BLOC~ 35
LOT
22
)
/
/
~/
....- A.SPHAL T PARp;IN';:: ...-/
/
SUR V E Y 0 R S
2'CURB
32.21
, 32\6
ic
,
4
, 32S~H~
<)4
4
IR E P 0 R T
LEGEND
~PAINT MARI<ING
(TYP)
BRL BEARING REFERENCE LINE
POL POINT ON UNE
(R) RADIAL
(C) COMPUTED MEASUREMENT
(D) DEED
(M) MEASURED
(P) PLAT
POB POINT OF BEGINNING
PCP PERMANENT CONTROL POINT
POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PC POINT OF CURVATURE
PRM PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT
T8M TEMPORARY BENCHMARK
FiR FOUND REBAR NO CAP SIZE AS NOTED
FOP FOUND OPEN PIPE SIZE AS NOTED
F"PP FOUND PINCHED PIPE SIZE AS NOTED
F '"x" CUT FOUND "x" CUT IN CONCRETE
FRC fOUND REBAR AND CAP
rCM rOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT SIZE AS NOTED
SIR SET IRON ROD
SRC SET 1/2" REBAR AND CAP LB *6168
SN&o SET NAIL AND DISK LB 661 68
N&TT NAIL AND TIN TAB
GAS VAlVE
WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
DRAINAGE MANHOLE
SANITARY MANHOLE
, 3199 . 31.82
~
~ 32~3274
POWER POLE
~LE BOX
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
ELECTRIC 80X C - EXIST1NG ELEVATION
~ .- ~OPOSED ELEVATION
=rz"".., . "
I <'A ...~~ONCRETE . '..
~~ ,~ '. ~ ..' "-. :"~ /:,.
<l
~
, '32.8S
eJ
-u--.
P,! . .POINT OF.INTERSF'(T!0N
F IT FENCE TIE
S/W SlDEWAlK
OHW OVERHEAD WIRE
if. CENTERUNE
WF WOOD ft:NCE
CLF CHAIN LINK fENCE
R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
SPRINKLER CONTROL BOX
E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT
-,,- SIGN
LIGHT POLE
~ WATER MmR
-<) GUY WIRE
(I) METAL POST
CIT CURB TIE
N&D NAIL AND DISK
EL ELEVATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (TITLE COMMITMENT)
LOT 24, BLOCK 32, AND LOTS 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, AND 50 FOOT STRIP OF
VACATED RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY ON THE EAST AND LOT 11, BLOCK 34,
MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
LEGA1_ DESCrfIPTION: (SURVEYED)
LOT 24, BLOCK 32, AND LOTS 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, TOGETHER THE WESTERLY
50 FEET OF V ACA TED RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING EASTERLY AND
EXTENDING THE NORTH & SOUTH LINES OF LOT 9, BLOCK 34, MAGNOLIA
P ARK, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY,
FLORIDA,
CERTIFY TO:
LAND PRECISION CORPORATION
------.~ -,.--..--J''''(
\,
....,.,
"
~
-
2683 SUNSET POINT ROAD
CLE:ARWATER. Fl 33759 LEI '6H~8
i21-796-2137
r,AX 727-796-3326
SURVEYfNG -" M~PPING - PLANNING
STYLISTIC DESIGN
SYNOVUS BANI< OF TAMPA BAY
SNKR I, LLC
A nORNEY'S TITLE INSURANCE
FUND INC.
!<ENT RUNNELLS, P A.
DRAWN BY JREIlI CHECI<ED BY: VEC
JOB NUMBER: 051 05
DAYESURVEYEO: 7/23/07
UPOA TES/HISTORY
--~--~_.- -"') /""'''....-
,,-~./~ ./ ///'.../'//
.L------- /'/ _./-"""., /-
/<' ,::::::}/ / .
,/' /-~/
/'..... "-
'-N<CEI'.IT E ,.;1J<3in, FL/\, LICENSED SiJRVE~'OR AND MApPER 1'0.
.l'fN.D'i VALJD WlTHOI)'i PolE SlSHAiURE AND n-IE ORIGlt'iAL RAISE'
0--// SEAL o-r ft. FtOR1DA LICENSED surVE1'OR AND MAPPER)
4{'j08
SHEET 1 OF 1
PREVIOUS SURVEY - 10/14/05
ADDITIONAL TOPO - 11/4/05
TITLE COMMITMENT - 7/31/07
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - 8/2/07
ADD LOT 24, BLOCI, 32 - 8/15/07
2,\ / y~ I~ '(>
a_..s:
1I. f:~(J( f:..r7 - ~~ u ff l.tf(';;-
"
r-
c::J
N
8
01
,
o
CII
o
-
.
NORTHstDE
Engineerin;!: Service... bte.
Civil
LlI1d Pbnning
Due Diligence Reports
[{e..Z.oning, Land Use, f\.nnexation
'itonnv.,r<Jter tvlanagcmcnt
Utility Design
Traffic
Construction Administration
STORMWATER REPORT
FOR
HARBOR OAKS PROFESSIONAL CENTER
PROJECT
~'- A. ~
RAM A. GaEL, PH.D.~ P.E. #47431
June 12, 2008
PROJECT No. 0731
f~O. Bo, 49,113
FL 3375B..49.H3
toe h i@Il()rthsidcomgineenng.col1l
T2} +D 2869 Fa'; 727 446 B036
DRAINAGE NARRATIVE
The proposed construction activities consist of the following:
. Construction of 35,077 S.F. of open impervious vehicular use,
building and sidewalk area.
. Construction of a stormwater pond to provide attenuation and water
quality treatment for a volllme equal to 12" of runoff over the entire
site.
. Treatment of stormwater will be achieved through an effluent
underdrain system. The overflow will be piped to an existing
stormwater system on Magnolia Drive.
. The more stringent of SWFWMD's 25yr / 24hr post-development
flow not exceeding the 25yr / 24hr pre-development flow vs.
Clearwater's weighted coefficient of runoff of stormwater detention
was used to determine the storage volume requirement. It was found
that the City of Clearwater's stormwater requirement (7,075 cf) was
more strict than SWFWMD's requirement and therefore was used in
the design of the pond.
. The Drainage Calculations have been prepared in accordance with the
City of Clearwater Drainage Manual.
. The project is located in an open basin. Construction of this project
will not increase the existing peak discharge rate or volume.
. No wetlands are located in or adjacent to the project area. No wetland
impacts will result from construction of this project.
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NO. :
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
T.O.C. =
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
C=
T.O.C. =
Harbor Oaks Professional Center
731
55,295 SF =
19,967 SF =
o SF =
35,328 SF =
1.27 ACRES
0.46 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.81 ACRES
55,295 SF
19,967 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
35,328 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.475
1
0.2
0.30
60 MINUTES'
55,295 SF =
35,077 SF =
3,703 SF =
16,515 SF =
1.27ACRES
0.81 ACRES
0.08 ACRES
0.38 ACRES
55,295 SF
35,077 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
3,703 SF OF POND AREA@ C =
16,515 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.95
1
0.2
0.73
60 MINUTES
PROJECT NAME:
Harbor Oaks Professional Center
PROJECT NO. :
731
POND STAGE STORAGE DATA:
n.H.W. 25 EL.=
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
34.50 4,096 0.094 9,517
34.25 3,899 0.090 8,517
34.00 3,103 0.085 7,567
33.50 3,309 0.076 5,814
33.00 2,916 0.067 4,258
32.00 2,129 0.049 1,735
31.00 1,342 0.031 0
T.O.B. EL.=
W.Q. EL.=
BOTTOM EL.=
TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
55,295 SF
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
0.50 IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
2,304 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
33.00 FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
4,258 CF
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
25 YEAR STORM EVENT
PROJECT: Harbor Oaks Professional Center
PROJECT NO. 731
RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS
PRE-CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
C=
0.30
POST -CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
c=
0.73
STORAGE CALCULATION
PRE-CONSTRUCTION
DRAINAGE AREA =
TIME OF CONC. Tc =
I @ T c =60 (25 YEAR EVENT)=
Q(out) = C x I x A =
POST -CONSTRUCTION
55,295 SF 1.27 AC
19,967 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
35,328 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.475
1
0.2
55,295 SF 1.27 AC
35,077 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
3,703 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
16,515 SF OF PERV. AREA@ C =
0.95
1
0.2
1.27 AC
60 MIN
3.60 IN/HR
1.37 CFS
TIME I Q(in) INFLOW OUTFLOW STORAGE
(MIN.) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (CF) (CF)
60.00 3.60 3.33 11,999 4,924 7,075
MAX. STORAGE =
WEIR DESIGN
TOP. OF WEIR HEV.=
BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.=
H=
Q=
L=Q/3.3*H^1.5 =
WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
0.5 in.
TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED = MAX. STORAGE REQUIRED =
TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED = MAX. STORAGE PROVIDED =
7,075 CF
34.00 FT
33.00 FT
1.00 FTor12"
1.37 CFS
0.42 FT or 5"
7,075 CF
7,567 CF
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
Harbor Oaks Professional Center
PROJECT NO.:
731
VOLUME PROVIDED = 4,258 C.F.
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 33.00 POND AREA (SF) =
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 31.00 POND AREA (SF) =
UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 30.00
COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT/MIN
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 36 FT
SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH
2,916 S.F.
1,342 S.F.
ELEV. AVG.HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. 'rlL TER ARE) FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME
FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN.
33.00 2,916
2.50 0.50 2.75 0.91 57 4.62 1,358 294
32.50 2,522
2.00 0.50 2.75 0.73 57 3.70 1,161 314
32.00 2,129
1.50 0.50 2.75 0.55 57 2.77 964 348
31.50 1,735
1.00 0.50 2.75 0.36 57 1.85 767 415
31.00 1,342
TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME =
4,251
C.F.
TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME =
22.8
HOURS
April 22, 2008
SNKR, I, LLC
1815 Health care Drive
Trinity, Florida 33655
Dr. Shodan Patel, Owner
Reference: HARBOR OAKS PROFESSIONAL CENTER
Subject: Maintenance and Operation of the Retention Pond
Dear Dr. Patel:
Per the rules and regulations of the Southwest Florida Water
Management District, we are required to furnish you with a set of
instructions for maintenance and operation of the retention pond.
The retention pond is designed to maintain certain volumes of rainfall
runoff corresponding to specific water elevations.
The control structure regulates the level of the water in the pond. The
volume above the weir should be discharged under a skimmer and
over the weir within a few hours following a storm event. The volume
below the weir should take less than 24 hours to be discharged
through natural soil infiltration. The water level in the pond should drop
approximately 24" below the weir, and the pond should be dry within
24 hours following a storm event, assuming there is no interceding
rainfall.
Here are some suggested procedures to keep the pond system
functional:
. The bottom of the pond should be inspected regularly
to assure that excess siltation or erosion has not
occurred. Siltation and erosion in the pond shall be
controlled to assure that the storage volume is not
affected. Periodic scarification of the pond bottom
and removal of silts may be required to rejuvenate
the percolation rate. It is required that scarification be
done every six (6) months.
. Grass clippings and other vegetative debris
should be removed from the area surrounding the
pond.
. The area immediatElly in front of the control
structure should be cleared of aquatic growth
. Limit fertilizer use around the pond area to
prevent nutrient loading of the facility.
. The control structure should be checked monthly
and all debris cleared.
. Your Management of Surface Water Permit
should contain a number of conditions which must
be met.
If you have any questions or concerns about this project please do not
hesitate to call our office.
Sincerely,
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Case Number:
Project Address:
Project Name:
NES Project:
Date:
FLD2008-05014
1001 S. Ft. Harrison
Harbor Oaks Professional Center
# 731
June 16, 2008
Narrative for StackiD2 LeD2th for Ma2Dolia Dr. Drivewav
The purpose of this narrative is to provide information relating to the traffic pattern
surrounding the proposed development, the proposed site design and the anticipated
effect the proposed stacking length may have on the safe movement of vehicles along the
local street:
· The design offers onsite parking with a single ingress and egress point along
Magnolia Drive and one egress point along S. Ft. Harrison for the bank drive-thru,
improving the previous existing conditions of two curb cuts along S. Ft. Harrison
and one curb cut along Magnolia Drive.
· The site design provides a safe 160' distance between the street intersection and
the driveway access along Magnolia Drive, improving the previous condition
which provided a curb cut within 75' of the intersection.
· Although the proposed stacking length does not meet the letter of the Code by
providing a 40' stacking area from property line, the intent and spirit of the code
is satisfied as the dimension from curb to the first parking space is 36' providing
safe access to and from the site.
· Magnolia Drive is a two lane, 30 MPH local type street which dead ends just east
of the Pinellas Trail, due to the minimal traffic flow along Magnolia it is expected
that the throat reduction from 40' to 17' will not create adverse traffic conditions
along Magnolia Drive.
Based upon the above factors, negative impact relating to function and safety are not
anticipated as a result of the proposed stacking length.
NOTE: Please also see Traffic Impact Study prepared by Robert Pergolizzi,
previously submitted.
Information prepared
By
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
6.16..08 Harbor Oaks NES 731 rmrlRMR
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 9, 10 AND 11, BLOCK 34, MAGNOLIA PARK AS
SHOWN ON A PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS
COUNTY, FLORIDA; TOGETHER WITH A PART OF THE
FORMER RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING EAST OF
SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 34 OF MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION.
~.
~~
~.
TOGETHER WITH LOT 24, BLOCK 32, MAGNOLIA PARK
AS SHOWN ON A PLA T THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLA T
BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.
FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION:
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD
ZONE "X" PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 12103C0108G
MAP REVISED: 9/03/2003
SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY A SIGNED & SEALED SURVEY BY:
LAND PRECISION CORPORATION
2683 SUNSET POINT ROAD
CLEARWATER, FL 33759
FLORIDA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 4608
DATED: 8/15/07
[[J rUT] IT]
[
SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP29S, RANGE 15 E
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.
LEGEND
EXIST. ELEVATION
EXIST. CONTOUR
j C\
NEW ELEVATION
+ 10.00
NEW CONTOUR
-----10----
EXIST. STORM SEWER
NEW STORM SEWER
-------
NEW UNDERDRAIN
,.......................,
EXIST. SAN. SEWER
NEW SAN. SEWER
.,_,_,_,_,_,_,.
EXIST. WATER SERVICE
-,,,.-.---- _-..._~~.. =--_.
NEW WATER SERVICE
-...............-
_UHU__U]
NEW INLET
.
e
NEW SAN. MANHOLE
NEW CLEAN-OUT(C.O.)
C.O.
.'-'-'-fi:p.'-'-'.
I::: ....
I I i.i.: '
.1
NEW BUILDING AREA
I}'.< .... . ...... .', ,.' "j
NEW ASPHALT
NEW CONCRETE
TEMP. SILT BARRIER
~ ~
POINT OF CONNECTION
OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST.
4
M
B.F.P,D.
F,H.A.
F,D.C.
T.B.O.
T.&V.
METER
BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE
FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF
TAP AND VALVE
PROJEC
SITE
[j- [[J ll1
[lilJ]]JJBI
lJ [LPtI::d LS,\
INDEX OF SHEETS
C1.1 CIVil SITE DATA
C1.2 CIVil SITE SPECIFICATIONS
C2.1 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN
C3.1 STAKING SITE PLAN
C4.1 GRADING, DRAINAGE &
UTiliTIES SITE PLAN
C5.1 CIVIL SITE DETAilS
C5.2 CIVIL SITE DETAilS
l1.1 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
l1.2 LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAilS
L1.3 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
SITE DATA
EXISTING (E) PROPOSED (P) REQUIRED
SOUTH PARCEL NORTH PARCEL SOUTH PARCEL NORTH PARCEL SOUTH PARCEL NORTH PARCEL
ZONING: . . .. ....
C 0 C 0 C 0
CG R/oG CG R/oG CG R/OG
LAND USE:
MEDICAL CLINIC STORMWATER
VACANT VACANT OFFICE --- ---
USAGE: BANK(OFFlCE) RETENTION
49,277 S.F. 6,018 S.F. 49,277 S.F. 6,018 S.F.
LOT AREA: 1.13 AC. 0.14 AC. 1.13 AC. 0.14 AC. 10,000 S.F. 3,500 S.F.
........... ,_ .... _....,_"__."...........,.._..'....0""..., ..-.....
TOTAL: 55,295 S.F. 1.27 AC. TOTAL: 55,295 S.F. 1.27 AC.
BUILDING COVERAGE: 6,659 S.F. 7,423 S.F. 15.06% I 0
---
(S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) (PRIOR TO DEMO.) TOTAL: 7,423 S.F. 13.42%
....
GROSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): F.A.R.: 18,604 S.F. 0.377 J 0
0 .. 0.55 0.50
--- TOTAL: 18,604 S.F. 0.336 (F.A.R.)
17.5'(N) TO BLDG.
7.5'(N) TO PAVM'T.
FRONT: --- l8.8'(W) TO BLDG. --- 25' 35'
221.6'(E) TO BLDG.
SETBACKS: . 7'(E) TO PAVM'T.
,.
10'(S) TO BLDG. 10' 20'
SIDE: --- 6'(S) TO S.W, ---
TOP or PARAPET: 32'-2)f' OFFICE:25' -50
BLDG. HEIGHT: --- MID-POINT OF" ROOF": 41'-6~" --- MED. CL.:25' 30'
Roor PEAK: 45' -4W'
PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: .~~&!;9$.f! ".. 0 ......
633 S.F. 0 .... ......
(V.U.A.) --- ---
TOTAL: 25,653 S.F.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 35,077 S.F. ....1 ---
633 S.F. 0 0.711 0.95 0.75
(I.S.R.) -'"""u'.'.'-,'_"__".__';"."_"",;".,,_
TOTAL: 35,077 S.F. 0.634
OPEN SPACE: 14,200 S.F. I 6,018 S.F.
(S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) 48,644 S.F. 0 28.8% 100% 5% 25%
98% TOTAL: 20,218 S.F. 36.5%
PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: --- 2,927 S.F. --- 10%
(S.F. & % OF V.U.A.) 11.4% ---
PARKING: --- 63 SPACES 60 SPACES ---
INCLUDING 3 H.C. ---
USE RATIO SQFT CALCULATION
PARKING CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED
BANK/OFFICE 4/1,000 GFA 3,600 3,600"" 1,000 = 3.6 x 4 - 14.4 or 14 Spaces
OFFICE 4/1,000 GFA 1,500 1,500 .,.. 1,000 = 1.5 x 4 = 6 Spaces
MEDICAL 3,823 (I III FI)
OFFICE 9,500 (2nd FI)
3/1,000 GFA 13,323 Total 13,323"" 1,000 = 13.32 x 3 = 39.96 or 40 Spaces
TOTAL 60 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES I
63 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 1
I
~~
oS
,~
~I
~I
-...
~!
!::z
.....
XIII
.8
...tA
.:1:
~I-
aoce
1"40
~z
... ~
. ~
Ii- _:I:
Z ....."
... 1"4 III
........
~ -..
< ...
Z ;(
o t
&:IC I
- III
>
Z
...
"
J
"
__\Ii
.'
.~
III
.
~
Z 1ft
- ,~;e
Z ,eM
Z OM
. ~.
.. =,A
D. Mce
lit. I: 0
wY ...
Z ~...
. ill Ii
.. 1:11I
.1-
. g;
""ce
> o~
:-:0...
... '^"
II
I NES Comm.: 07~
I Drawn By: N.E-
I Checked By: -
H.te
ii
LJ
o
~
I Issue Date:
Revisions:
N D
II,
03/2:~ :~
D j, n
O. ate escnplt
& 06/05/08 PER DRe
L / I
L / /
L / /
L / /
L / I
L / /
ii
II
I:t::
LLI
I-
Z
LLI
(.)
-I
c:c
Z
0
-
U)
U)
LLI
LI- N
N
0 'l\f"
~ fY')
I:t:: I
U')
[? U')
a.. I"-
~ fY')
fY')
@ U) -, <(
"-.
~ C 0
-
[!!gJ c:c V ~
-.
C~ 0
[? 0 C~ ...J
<( u..
c::J I:t:: :Ie ...
rJ!fi) ~
1-'" w
d 0 C~ ~
~ C~
c:::J u.
~ I:t:: v ~
c:c <(
c:::J c: w
@ ::z: c: ...J
U
II
II
THIS DRAWING IS AN tNSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHAll REMAIN n-lE PROPERiY OF THE
ENGINEER. AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED. PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY Wln-lOUT
THE CONSENT OF n-lE ENGINEER. e COPYRlG HT 200B NOT PUBLISHED
RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P.E. #47431
COPIES OF n-lESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS
EMBOSSED Wln-l THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL
@~D~
"II
S W F W M D I EROSION CONTROL NOTES
OUR NG CONSTRUCT ON SEDIMENT S TO REMA N ON S TE THE CONTRACTOR S
RESPONS BLE FOR THE NSTALLAT ON OF EROS ON AND SED MENT CONTROL DEV CES
PR OR TO NT AT NG AND DUR NG A L PHASES OF LAND CLEAR NG AND CONSTRUCT ON
TO PREVENT SO L EROS ON AND S LTAT ON
2 THE RETENT ON AREAS SHALL BE ROUGH GRADED PR OR TO CONSTRUCT ON WTH ALL
STORM WATER 0 RECTED TO T AFTER COMPLET ON OF ALL WORK REMOVE DEBR S
AND S LTAT ON FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE RETENTION BAS NAND F NE GRADE THE
F NAL S X (6) NCHES AND SOD CONTRACTOR TO MA NTAIN THE S DE SLOPE REQU RED
AND SHOWN ON PLAN AND NOT FY ENG N EER FOR AN NSPECT ON PR OR TO SODD NG
3 THE RETENT ON AREAS AND OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
EARLY N THE CONSTRUCT ON PER 00 TO M T GATE ANY ADVERSE WATER QUANT 1Y
N PARTS OFF S TE
4 AFTER COMPLET ON OF THE PROJECT THE OWNER W LL BE RESPONS BLE FOR THE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE STORMWATER FAC L1TIES ACTIONS INCLUDED
SHALL BE REGULAR MOW NG OF THE BOTTOM AND S DE SLOPES PLUS PER OD C
INSPECTIONS AND REMOVAL OF DEBR S TRASH ETC THAT MAY BLOCK THE
OPEN NGS N THE CONTROL STRUCTURES
5 ALL 0 STURBED COND TIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO NATURAL CONDITIONS OR BETTER
6 ALL S DE SLOPES OF RETENT ON OR SWALE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY VEGETATION
OR OTHER MATER ALS TO M N MIZE EROS ON AND PROTECT THE STORMWATER BAS N
NOTE PLAN CONFLICTS SHOWN OR UNSHOWN W TH OTHER EX STING S TE MPROVEMENTS
SHALL BE THE RESPONSIB L lY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AND PROTECT
OR RE NSTALL ALL DISTURBED EXIST NG UTIL T ES PHONE L NES POWER L NES POWER
SUPPORT CABLES SPR NKLER L NES AND CONTROLS MECHAN CAL P PEL NES OR
UNDERGROUND POWER CABLES AND RETURN EXIST NG CONCRETE WALKS DUMPSTER PADS
FENCE HANDRA L VALVES HYDRANTS GUY W RES ELECTRIC BOXES AND P PEL NES
WH CH SHALL BE REPA RED OR RE NSTALLED AS NC DENTAL TO THE COST OF WORK SHOWN
HEREUNDER T SHALL BE THE RESPONS B L 1Y OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RESOLVE ANY
CONFL CTS PR OR TO AWARD OF THE CONTRACT
NOTE REQU RED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAN NTACT THROUGHOUT
CONSTRUCT ON FA LURE TO NSTALL OR PROPERLY MA NTA N THESE BARR CADES W LL
RESULT N ENFORCEMENT ACT ON WH CH MAY NCLUDE C TAT ONS AS PROV DED BY CHAPTERS
40D 4 & 40D 40 FA C CAN RESULT N A PENALlY NOT TO EXCEED $10000 PER
OFFENSE W TH EACH DATE DUR NG WH CH SUCH V OLAT ON OCCURS CONST TUT NG A
OFFENSE
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS INSPECTIONS FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE FACILITY
1 ALL SODDED AREAS SHALL BE MOWED AND MAINTA NED PROPERLY
2 UNDER NO C RCUMSTANCES SHALL THE RETENT ON AREA BE F LLED WITH ANY OTHER
SUBSTANCE THAN STORMWATER
3 SWALE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF ANY OBSTRUCT ONS
4 F DAMAGE TO THE SYSTEM DOES OCCUR THE SYSTEM SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED
N ACCORDANCE WTH THE APPROVED PLAN
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE OF THE STORMWATER SYSTEM
THE OWNER SHALL PER OD CALLY MON TOR THE STORMWATER SYSTEM (P PE CONVEYANCE
SYSTEM AND RETENT ON POND) FOR S L T AND SED MENTAT ON BU LD UP THE P PE
CONVEYANCE SYSTEM SHALL BE FLUSHED AS DEEMED NECESSARY NO LESS THAN TW CE A
YEAR ALL MATER AL SHALL BE COLLECTED DOWNSTREAM AND REMOVED THE RETENT ON
POND SHALL BE KEPT MOWED AND THE BOTTOM FREE OF DEBR S F WATER STANDS N
THE POND MORE THAN 48 HOURS THE OWNER SHALL RAKE AND/OR SCAR FY THE POND
BOTTOM AS DEEMED NECESSARY AND NO LESS THAN TW CE A YEAR TO RESTORE THE
PERCOLAT ON CHARACTER ST CS OF THE POND THE OWNER W LL BE RESPONS BLE TO MAKE
SURE THAT TO THE BEST OF H S AB L TY NOTH NG ENTERS THE SYSTEM BES DES
STORMWATER THAT COULD DETER ORATE THE FUNCT ON NG CAPAB L TIES OF THE SYSTEM E
GASOL NE 0 L GREASE CHEM CALS ETC
THE POND UNDERDRA N SYSTEM SHALL BE NSPECTED ANNUALLY AND RETROF TTED AND
FLUSHED SEM ANNUALLY CLOGGED OR SPENT F LTER MATERIAL SHALL BE D SPOSED OF N
ALL MANNERS AS WTH THE HANDL NG OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE THE SPENT F LTER
MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF N A PERMITTED FACILITY
EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL NOTES
SED MENT TRAPP NG MEASURES SED MENT BAS NS AND TRAPS PER METER BERMS
F LTER FENCES BERMS SEDIMENT BARR ERS VEGETAT VE BUFFERS AND OTHER
MEASURES NTENDED TO TRAP SED MENT AND/OR PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF
SED MENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERT ES OR NTO EX ST NG WATER BOD ES MUST BE
NSTALLED CONSTRUCTED OR N THE CASE OF VEGETATVE BUFFERS PROTECTED
FROM D STURBANCE AS A F RST STEP N THE LAND ALTERAT ON PROCESS SUCH
SYSTEMS SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIVE AND NSPECTED BY THE ENG NEER BEFORE
ANY OTHER DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE BEG NS
2 PROTECT ON OF EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEMS DURING CONSTRUCTION ALL
STORM SEWER NLETS N THE VIC N TY OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY
SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES SOD STONE ETC WH CH SHALL BE
MA NTAINED AND MOD F ED AS REQU RED BY CONSTRUCT ON PROGRESS AND WH CH
MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENG NEER BEFORE INSTALLAT ON
3 SED MENTAT ON BAS N THE CONTRACTOR W LL BE REQU RED TO PROHIBIT D SCHARGE
OF S L T THROUGH THE OUTFALL STRUCTURE DUR NG CONSTRUCT ON OF ANY RETENT ON
AREA AND W LL BE REQU RED TO CLEAN OUT THE RETENT ON AREA BEFORE NSTALL NG
ANY PERMANENT SUBDRAIN P PE N ADD T ON PERMANENT RETENTION AREAS MUST
BE TOTALLY CLEANED OUT AND OPERATE PROPERLY AT FINAL NSPECT ON AND AT
THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD
4 SWALES D TCHES AND CHANNELS ALL SWALES D TCHES AND CHANNELS LEAD NG
FROM THE S TE SHALL BE SODDED WTH N (3) DAYS OF EXCAVATION ALL OTHER
INTER OR SWALES ETC NCLUD NG DETENT ON AREAS W LL BE SODDED PR OR TO
SSUANCE OF A CERTIF CATE OF OCCUPANCY
5 PROTECTION AND STAB L ZAT ON OF SO L STOCKP LES FLL MATER AL STOCKP LES
SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL T MES BY ON S TE DRA NAGE CONTROLS WHICH
PREVENT EROS ON OF THE STOCKPILED MATER AL CONTROL OF DUST FROM SUCH
STOCKP LED MATER AL MAY BE REQUIRED DEPEND NG UPON THE R LOCATION AND THE
EXPECTED LENGTH OF T ME THE STOCKP LES W LL BE PRESENT N NO CASE SHALL
UNSTAB L ZED STOCKP LE REMAIN AFTER TH RTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS
6 MA NTENANCE ALL EROS ON AND S LTAT ON CONTROL DEV CES SHALL BE CHECKED
REGULARLY ESPEC ALLY AFTER EACH RA NFALL AND WILL BE CLEANED OUT
AND/OR REPA RED AS REQUIRED
FILTER MEDIUM SPECIFICATIONS
THE F LTER SAND SHALL BE WASHED MATER AL MEET NG F DOT ROAD AND BR DGE
SPEC F CAT ONS FOR S L CA SAND AND QUARTZ GRAVELS OR MIXTURES THEREOF (LESS
THAN ONE (1) PERCENT S LT CLAY AND ORGAN C MATTER) UNLESS F LTER CLOTH S
USED WHICH IS SUITABLE TO RETA N THE SILT CLAY AND ORGANIC MATTER W TH N THE
F L TER CALC UM CARBONATE AGGREGATE IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTTUTE AND HAVE
AN EFFECTIVE GRA N S ZE OF 020 TO 055 M LL METERS N D AMETER A UN FORM TY
COEFF CENT OF 1 5 OR GREATER
RATE OF 0 125 CM/SEC OR GREATER F THE PERMEAB L TY RATE OF THE F LTER
SAND S LESS THAN 0 125 CM/SEC A REPLACEMENT OF THE F LTER SYSTEM W LL
BE REQU RED AT THE CONTRACTOR S EXPENSE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE
SAND TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE ENG NEER PR OR TO INSTALLATION T IS
RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAVE THE FLTER SAND TESTED AND APPROVED
2 THE PERFORATED P PE SHALL CONSIST OF POLYV NYL CHLOR DE (PVC) CONFORM NG TO
ASTM D 3033 HAVE M N MUM OF S XTEEN (16) 3/8 INCH D AMElER PERFORAT ONS
PER LINEAR FOOT OF PIPE AND BE ON THE BOTTOM 135 OF THE P PE
3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROV DE DEWATER NG MEASURES AS REQU RED DUR NG
THE INSTALLAT ON OF THE UNDERDRA N AND ALL OF TS COMPONENTS
4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BACKF LL THE ORA N P PE UNT L THE ENG NEER HAS
VERIF ED AND APPROVED THE DRAIN PIPE GRADES AND NSTALLAT ON OF F L TER MED A
5 SWFWMD REQU RES AS BU LT CERTIF CATION BY THE ENG NEER FOR THIS FILTER SYSTEM
TEST REPORTS FROM AN APPROVED LABORATORY ON GRADATION AND PERMEAB L TY
SHALL BE NCLUDED N THE AS BU LT SUBM TTAL
CLEARING AND GRUBBING NOTES
CLEARING AND GRUBBING NOTES (CON 1)
5 ALL CONSTRUCT ON DEBR S AND OTHER WASTE MATER AL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF
OFF S TE N ACCORDANCE W TH APPL CABLE REGULAT ONS ONLY GRAD NG BY
HAND SPERM TTED W TH N THE CANOPY L NE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMA N
6 THE CONTRACTOR S TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERM TS FOR REMOV NG ANY
EX ST NG STRUCTURES
7 T S THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONS B L TY TO NOT FY ALL UT L TY COMPAN ES TO
D SCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACIL T ES PRIOR TO REMOV NG OR DEMOL SH NG
8 THE CONTRACTOR W LL BE RESPONS BLE FOR MAKING A VISUAL INSPECT ON OF THE
S TE AND WILL BE RESPONS BLE FOR THE DEMOL T ON AND REMOVAL OF ALL
UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES THAT W LL NOT BE NCORPORATED
W TH THE NEW FACILITIES SHOULD ANY DISCREPANC ES EX ST W TH THE PLANS
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING THE OWNER AND REQUESTING
A CLAR F CAT ON OF THE PLANS PRIOR TO DEMOL TON
9 DUR NG CONSTRUCT ON ALL STORM SEWER NLETS N THE V C N TY OF THE
PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SED MENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES
SOD STONE ETC WH CH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MOD FlED AS REQUIRED BY
CONSTRUCTON PROGRESS
10 ALL EROSION AND SILTAT ON CONTROL METHODS SHALL BE MPLEMENTED PRIOR TO
THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND MA NTA NED UNTIL CONSTRUCT ON S COMPLETE
11 WHEN CONSTRUCT ON S COMPLETED THE RETENT ON/DETENT ON AREAS W LL BE
RESHAPED CLEANED OF S LT MUD AND DEBR SAND RE SODDED N ACCORDANCE
TO THE PLANS
2 CONTRACTOR S TO PROV DE EROS ON CONTROL/SED MENTAT ON BARR ER (HAY
BALES OR SLTATON CURTAN) TO PREVENT SLTATON OF ADJACENT PROPERlY
STREETS STORM SEWERS WATERWAYS AND EX ST NG WETLANDS
WATER SYSTEM NOTES
ALL WATER MA NS SHALL HAVE A M N MUM or 36 NCHES OF COVER
2 ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORM W TH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND
SPECI FICA TIONS
3 ALL DUCT LE RON P PE SHALL BE CLASS 52 N ACCORDANCE W TH ANSI A 21 50
(AWWA C 15D) AND ANSI A 21 31 (AWWA C 151) AND P PE SHALL RECEVE
EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21 6 A 21 8 OR A
21 51 AND SHALL BE MORTAR LINED STANDARD TH CKNESS AND BITUMINOUS
SEALED N ACCORDANCE W TH ANS A 21 6 (IA.WWA C 104 71)
4 ALL FITT NGS LARGER THAN 2 SHALL BE DUCTILE RON CLASS 53 IN ACCORDANCE
W TH AWWA C 110 W TH A PRESSURE RATING OF 350 PS JOINTS SHALL BE
MECHAN CAL JO NTS N ACCORDANCE WITH AWfWA C 111 F TTINGS SHALL BE
CEMENT MORTAR LNED AND COATED N ACCORDANCE WTH AWWA C 104
5 ALL PVC WATER MA NS 4 THROUGH 12 SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE W TH AWWA
C 900 P PE SHALL BE CLASS 5FO AND MEET THE REQU REMENTS OF SDR 18 N
ACCORDANCE W TH ASTM D 224
6 WATER MA N P P NG OF LESS THAN 4 SHALL BE PER ASTM D2241 89
7 ALL FTTNGS 2 AND SMALLER SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC WTH SOLVENT WELDED
SLEEVE TYPE JO NTS
8 ALL GATE VALVES 2 OR LARGER SHALL BE RES LENT SEAT OR RES LENT WEDGE
MEETING THE REQU REMENTS OF AWWA C509
9 ALL F RE HYDRANTS SHALL MEET THE REQU REMENTS OF AWWA C502 AND SHALL BE
APPROVED BY THE LOCAL UT L TY AND FIRE MARSHALL
10 THE CONTRACTOR S TO NSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW OFFS AT THE END OF WATER
SERV CE LATERALS TO ASSURE ADEQUATE FLUSH NG AND D S NFECT ON
11 THRUST BLOCK NG SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL F TT NGS AND HYDRANTS AS SHOWN
ON DETA LS
12 MATER ALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR WATER D STR BUT ON SYSTEM SHALL
BE N ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY CODES
13 THE RR GATION SYSTEM SHALL HAVE PURPLE COLOR P P NG AND LABEL NG ON THE
PIPE TO NSURE D FFERENTIAT ON FROM POTABLE WATER P P NG
WATER SYSTEM TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM NCLUD NG F TT NGS HYDRANTS
CONNECTION AND VALVES SHALL REMA N UNCOVERED UNT L PROPERLY PRESSURE
TESTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER S ENGINEER PRESSURE TESTS TO BE IN
ACCORDANCE W TH WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS CONTRACTOR TO NOT FY
OWNER S ENG NEER AND WATER DEPARTMENT INSPECTORS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF
PERFORM NG TESTS
2 NEW WATER MAINS
AFTER COMPLET ON OF NSTALLATION OF NEW WATER MAINS PRESSURE TEST NG SHALL
BE PERFORMED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION WATER SYSTEM
STANDARDS AND SPEC F CATIONS CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM CHLORINATION
SAMPL NG OF NEW WATER MA NS SHALL CON FORM W TH COUNlY PUBLIC HEALTH UN T
REQU REMENTS AND RESULTS FORWARDED TO) THE ENG NEER UNDER NO C RCUMSTANCES
SHALL A NEW WATER SYSTEM BE PLACED NTO SERVCE UNTL CERTIFICATON BY THE
ENG NEER HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND A RELEASE FROM COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UN T
HAS BEEN SSUED
SANITARY SEWER NOTES
1 ALL SAN TARY SEWER MA NS & LATERAL SHALL HAVE A MIN MUM OF 36 INCHES OF
COVER
2 ALL SAN TARY SEWER MA NS & SERV CE LATERALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF
POLYVNYL CHLORIDE PIPE SDR 35 OR AS OTHERWISE NDICATED ON THE
CONSTRUCT ON DRAWINGS
3 ALL SAN TARY SEWER WORK SHALL CONFORM WTH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS
AND SPEC F CAT ONS
4 PR OR TO COMMENC NG WORK WHICH REQU RES CONNECT NG NEW WORK TO EX ST NG
LINES OR APPURTENANCES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND
ELEVATION OF EXIST NG CONNECTION POINT AND NOTIFY OWNER S ENGINEER OF
ANY CONFL CTS OR D SCREPANC ES
5 PVC P PE AND F TT NGS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPEC F CAT ONS DES GNAT ON
D 3034 77C MA SDR 35 NSTALLATION OF SDR 35 P PE SHALL BE N STR CT
ACCORDANCE W TH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM SPEC F CAT ON SECT ON D2321
ALL SAN TARY SEWER PIPEL NES SHALL BE SOL D GREEN N COLOR
6 ALL PVC FORCE MA NS SHALL BE CLASS 2000 SDR 21 COLOR GREEN W TH A
GREEN MAGNET C TAPE A M NIMUM OF 2 W DE PLACED 1 FOOT BELOW THE
PROPOSED GRADE THE PRINTING ON THE MAGNET C TAPE SHOULD READ
FORCEMA N
7 ALL DUCT LE RON P PE SHALL BE CLASS 52 N ACCORDANCE W TH ANSI A 21 50
(AWWA C 50) AND ANS A2151 (AWWA C 151) DUCHE IRON PPE SHALL
RECE VE NTER OR AND EXTERIOR B TUMINOUS COATING N ACCORDANCE W TH ANS
A 21 6 A 21 8 OR A 21 51
8 ALL SANITARY SEWER GRAV TY MA NS OR SANITARY SEWER FORCEMA NS THAT
REQUIRE 0 I P ARE TO BE POLYLlNED OR EPOXY L NED
9 ALL SANITARY SEWER COVERS SHALL BE TRAFF C RATED FOR HS 20 LOAD NG
SANITARY SEWER TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
ALL GRAV TY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A TELEV SION NSPECT ON BY
THE OWNER S CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS N
ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE NSPECT ON
2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM AN EXF LTRATION TEST ON ALL GRAVllY SEWERS
NSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE W TH THE REGULATION AGENCY HAV NG JUR SD CT ON
MAX MUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE 100 GPD PER NCH PIPE DIAMETER PER M LE
TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL
COORDINATON AND NOTFICATON OF ALL PARTES IS THE CONTRACTOR S
RESPONS B L1TY
3 ALL FORCE MAINS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST N
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATORY AGENCY HAVING JUR SD CT ON SA D TESTS
ARE TO BE CREATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND SUBMITTED TO THE
REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL COORD NAT ON AND NOT FICAT ON OF ALL
PART ES S THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONS B L1TY
WATER/SEWER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS
62 555314 LOCATION OF PUBL C WATER SYSTEM MA NS
FOR THE PURPOSE OF TH S SECT ON THE PHASE WATER MAINS SHALL MEAN MAINS NCLUD NG
TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS P P NG CONVEYING ETHER RAW PART ALLY TREATED OR FINISHED
DR NK NG WATER F RE HYDRANT LEADS AND SERVICE LINES THAT ARE UNDER THE CONTROL OF
A PUBL C WATER SYSTEM AND THAT HAVE AN NSIDE D AMETER OF THREE NCHES OR GREATER
(1) HOR ZONTAL SEPARAT ON BETWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MA NS AND SAN TARY OR STORM
SEWERS WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MA NS RECLA MED WATER PIPEL NES AND ON SITE
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND D SPOSAL SYSTEMS
(A) NEW OR RELOCATED UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HOR ZONTAL
o STANCE OF AT LEAST THREE FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTS DE
OF ANY EX ST NG OR PROPOSED STORM SEWER STORMWATER FORCE MA N OR PIPEL NE CONVEYING
RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART II OF CHAPTER 62 610 FA C
(B) NEW OR RELOCATED UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE lAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL
DISTANCE OF AT LEAST THREE FEET AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE
WATER MA N AND THE OUTS DE OF ANY EX ST NG OR PROPOSED VACUUM TYPE SAN TARY SEWER
(C) NEW OR RELOCATED UNDERGROUND WATER MANS SHALL BE LAD TO PROVDE A HORIZONTAL
DISTANCE OF AT LEAST SIX FEET AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET BETWEEN THE OUTS DE OF THE
WATER MAIN AND THE OUTS DE OF ANY EX STING OR PROPOSED GRAVTY OR PRESSURE TYPE
SAN TARY SEWER WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN OR PIP NG CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER NOT REGULATED
UNDER PART II OF CHAPTER 62 610 FAC THE MNIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DSTANCE BETWEEN
WATER MAINS AND GRAVITY TYPE SAN TARY SEWERS SHALL BE REDUCED TO THREE FEET WHERE THE
BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS LA 0 AT LEAST SIX INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER
(D) NEW OR RELOCATED UNDERGROUND WATER MA NS SHALL BE LA 0 TO PROV DE A HORIZONTAL
DISTANCE OF AT LEAST TEN FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MA N AND AlL PARTS
OF ANY EX ST NG OR PROPOSED ON SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND 0 SPOSAL SYSTEM AS DEFINED
IN SECT ON 381 0065(2) F S AND RULE 64E 6002 FA C
(2) VERTICAL SEPARAT ON BETWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS
WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MA NS AND RECLAIMED WATER PIPEL NES
(A) NEW OR RELOCATED UNDERGROUND WATER MA NS CROSSING ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED
GRAVITY OR VACUUM TYPE SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER SHALL BE LAID so THE OUTSIDE
OF THE WATER MA N IS AT LEAST SIX INCHES AND PREFERABLY 12 NCHES ABOVE OR AT LEAST
12 INCHES BELOW THE OUTSIDE OF THE OTHER PIPEL NE HOWEVER IT IS PREFERABLE TO LAY
THE WATER MA N ABOVE THE OTHER PIPELINE
(B) NEW OR RELOCATED UNDERGROUND WATER MA NS CROSS NG ANY EXIST NG OR PROPOSED
PRESSURE TYPE SANITARY SEWER WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MA N OR PIPEL NE
CONVEYING RECLAMED WATER SHALL BE LAID SO THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN S AT
LEAST 12 NCHES ABOVE OR BELOW THE OUTS DE OF THE OTHER PIPEL NE HOWEVER T S
PREFERABLE TO LAY THE WATER MAIN ABOVE THE OTHER PIPEL NE
(C) AT THE UT L TY CROSS NG DESCRIBED N PARAGRAPHS (A) AND (B) ABOVE ONE FULL LENGTH
OF WATER MA N PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED ABOVE OR BELOW THE OTHER PIPEL NE SO THE WATER
MAIN JOINTS W LL BE AS FAR AS POSS BLE FROM THE OTHER P PEL NE ALTERNAT VELY AT SUCH
CROSS NGS THE PIPES SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT ALL WATER MAN JO NTS ARE AT LEAST
THREE FEET FROM ALL JOINTS IN VACUUM TYPE SAN TARY SEWERS STORM SEWERS STORMWATER
FORCE MAINS OR PIPELINES CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART OF CHAPTER
62 610 FA C AND AT LEAST S X FEET FROM ALL JO NTS N GRAVITY OR PRESSURE TYPE SANITARY
SEWERS WAStEWATER FORCE MAINS OR P PEL NES CONVEYING RECLA MED WATER NOT REGULATED
UNDER PART I OF CHAPTER 62 610 FA C
(3) SEPARAT ON BETWEEN WATER MA NS AND SAN TARY OR STORM SEWER MANHOLES
(A) NO WATER MAIN SHALL PASS THROUGH OR COME INTO CONTACT WITH ANY PART OF A
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
(B) EFFECTVE AUGUST 28 2003 WATER MANS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED OR ALTERED TO PASS
THROUGH OR COME NTO CONTACT W TH ANY PART OF A STORM SEWER MANHOLE OR INLET
STRUCTURE WHERE T IS NOT TECHNICAlLY FEAS BLE OR ECONOM CALLY SENSIBLE TO COMPLY WTH
TH S REQUIREMENT (I.E WHERE THERE S A CONFLICT N THE ROUT NG OF A WATER MAIN AND A
STORM SEWER AND WHERE ALTERNATVE ROUTNG OF THE WATER MAN OR THE STORM SEWER IS NOT
TECHN CALLY FEAS BLE OR S NOT ECONOM CAllY SENS BLE) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPT ONS
TO THIS REQU REMENT (I,E THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW CONSTRUCT ON OF CONFLICT MANHOLES)
BUT SUPPLIES OF WATER OR PERSONS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT CONFL CT MANHOLES MUST FIRSl
OBTAIN A SPEC FIC PERM T FROM THE DEPARTMENT N ACCORDANCE WTH PART V OF THIS CHAPTER
AND MUST PROVIDE N THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT OR DRAW NGS SPEC FICAT ONS AND DES GN
DATA ACCOMPANYING THE R PERMIT APPLlCAT ON THE FOLLOW NG NFORMATION
(1) TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC JUSTIF CATION FOR EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE
(2) A STATEMENT DENT FY NG THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR MA NTA NING EACH CONFL CT MANHOLE
(3) ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE W TH THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ON REQU REMENTS N SUB
SUBPARAGRAPHS A THROUGH 0 BELOW
(A) EACH WATER MAN PASSING THROUGH A CONFLCT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE A FLEX BLE WATERTIGHT
JOINT ON EACH S DE OF THE MANHOLE TO ACCOMMODATE DIFFERENTIAL SETT NG BETWEEN THE MAIN
AND THE MANHOLE
(B) WTHIN EACH CONFLICT MANHOLEh THE WATER MAIN PASSING THROUGH THE MANHOLE SHALL BE
INSTALLED N A WATERTIGHT CAS NG t-' PE HAV NG H GH MPACT STRENGTH (I E HAVING AN IMPACT
STRENGTH (E HAV NG AN IMPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT OF 025 NCH TH CK DUCTILE
IRON P PEl
(C) EACH CONFL CT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE AN ACCESS OPEN NG AND SHALL BE S ZED TO ALLOW FOR
EASY CLEAN NG OF THE MANHOLE
(D) GRATINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM SEWER INLHS UPSTREAM OF EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE
TO PREVENT LARGE OBJECTS FROM ENTER NG THE MANHOLE
(4) SEPARATON BETWEEN FIRE HYDRANT DRANS AND SANTARY OR STORM SEWERS WASTEWATER OR
STORMWATER FORCE MA NS RECLAIMED WATER P PEUNES AND ON S TE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND D SPOSAL
SYSTEMS NEW OR RELOCATED F RE HYDRANTS W TH UNDERGROUND DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT
THE DRAINS ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED STORM SEWER STORMWATER
FORCE MAIN OR PIPEL NE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART II OF CHAPTER 62 610
FA C AT LEAST THREE FEET AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET FROM AN'( EXISTING OR PROPOSED VACUUM TYPE
SAN TARY SEWER AT LEAST SIX FEET AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET FROM AN'( EX ST NG OR PROPOSED GRAVIlY
OR PRESSURE TYPE SANITARY SEWER WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN OR P PELlNE CONVEY NG RECLAIMED WATER
NOT REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62 610 FA C AND AT LEAST TEN FEET FROM ANY EXISTING
OR PROPOSED 'ON SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM AS DEFNED N SECTION 3810065(2)
F S AND RULE 64E 6 002 FA C
(5) EXCEPTONS WHERE IT IS NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR ECONOMCALlY SENSBLE TO COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS IN SUBSECTION (1) OR (2) ABOVE THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THESE
REQU REMENTS IF SUPPLIES OF WATER OR CONSTRUCTION PERM T APPUCANTS PROVIDE TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC
JUSTFICAT ON FOR EACH EXCEPT ON AND PROV DE AI. TERNAnVE CONSTRUCT ON FEATURES THAT AFFORD A S M lAR
LEVEL OF RELABUTY AND PUBLC HEALTH PROTECTION ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCT ON FEATURES
NCLUDING THE FOLLOW NG
(A) WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN S BENG LAD LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINMUM HORZONTAL DSTANCE
~ROM ANOTHER P PEL NE AND WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS CROSS NG ANOTHER PIPELINE AND JOINTS
IN THE WATER MA N ARE BEING LOCATED LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM D STANCE FROM JOINTS IN THE OTHER
PIPELINE
(1) USE OF PRESSURE RATED PIPE CONFORMNG TO THE AMERCAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARDS
NCORPORATED NTO RULE 62 555 330 FA C FOR THE OTHER PIPELINE IF T S A GRAVITY OR VACUUM
TYPE PIPELINE
(2) USE OF WELDED FUSED OR OTHERWISE RESTRA NED JO NTS FOR EITHER THE WATER MA N OR THE OTHER
PIPELINE
(3) USE OF WATERT GHT CAS NG PIPE OR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR NCHES TH CK FOR ETHER THE
WATER MAIN OR THE OTHER P PElINE
(B) WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS BEING LAID LESS THAN THREE FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANOTHER
PIPELINE AND WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN S CROSSING ANOTHER P PEL NE AND S BE NG LAID LESS THAN
THE REQUIRED M N MUM VERT CAL D STANCE FROM THE OTHER PIPEL NE
(1) USE OF PIPE OR CASING P PE HAVING HIGH IMPACT STRENGTH (E HAVING AN MPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST
taUAL TO THAT OF 0 25 NCH THItK DUCTILE IRON PIPE) OR CONC~ETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR INCHES TH CK
FOR THE WATER MA NAND
(2) USE OF PIPE OR CASING PIPE HAVNG H GH MPACT STRENGTH rl E HAVING AN MPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST
tClUAL TO THAT OF 0 25 NCH TH CK DUCT LE RON PIPE) OR CONC~ETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR INCHES TH CK
FOR THE OTHER PIPEUNE FITS NEW AND S CONVEYING WASTEWATER OR RECLAIMED WATER
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES
1 ALL DELETER OUS SUBSTANCE MATERIAL (E MUCK PEAT BURIED DEBR S) IS
TO BE EXCAVATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE
OWNER S ENGINEER OR OWNER S SOIL TESTING COMPANY DELETERIOUS MATER AL
S TO BE STOCKP LED OR REMOVED FROM THE S TE AS D RECTED BY THE OWNER
EXCAVATED AREAS ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED MATER ALS AND
COMPACTED AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS
2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONS BLE FOR PROTECT NG EXCAVAT NG AGA NST
COLLAPSE AND W LL PROVIDE BRACING SHEETING OR SHOR NG AS NECESSARY
TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE P PE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BE NG
PLACED DEWATER NG SHALL BE USED AS REQU RED
3 ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE CLASS I (ASTM C 76)
UNLESS OTHERW SE NOTED ON PLANS
4 PVC STORM PIPE 12 AND SMALLER SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C 900 CLASS 150
STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERW SE NOTED
5 ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRATES AND COVERS W TH N TRAFF C AREAS SHALL BE
TRAFFIC RATED FOR HS 20 LOADINGS
6 THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SOD THE RETENTION/DETENTION POND AS NDICATED ON
PLANS W THIN ONE WEEK FOLLOW NG CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND
7 MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCT ON METHODS FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE
CONSTRUCT ON SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY
8 ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO THE NVERT
ELEVAT ONeS) OF THE STORM P PES(S)
STORM PIPE SHALL BE SAW CUT EVEN WITH THE STRUCTURE WALL(S)
GROUT AROUND PIPES FOR WATER T GHT AND SMOOTH F NISH
PAVING GRADING & DRAINAGE TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
THE STORM ORA NAGE P P NG AND FILTRAT ON SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A
V SUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER S SOILS ENGINEER PR OR TO THE PLACEMENT OF
BACKF LL
2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MA NTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS UNTIL F NAL
ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT
3 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE APPL CABLE TEST NG
WITH THE SOILS ENG NEER TESTS WILL BE REQU RED PURSUANT W TH THE
TESTING SCHEDULE FOUND IN THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS UPON
COMPLET ON OF THE WORK THE SO LS ENGINEER MUST SUBMIT CERTIF CATIONS TO
THE OWNER S ENG NEER STAT NG THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET
WORK IN FDOT RIGHTS-OF-WAY
1 DR VEWAY TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO FOOT NDEX #515
2 EROSION CONTROL AND SHOULDER SODD NG SHALL CONFORM TO FOOT ND# 104 &
105 ALL D STURBEG AREAS W THIN FOOT R GHT OF WAY SHALL BE SODDED
3 GUARDRA LS SHALL CONFORM TO FOOT IND#400
4 ALL STRIP NG SHALL BE LEAD FREE NON SOLVENT BASED THERMOPLAST C AND MEET
ACCORD NG TO THE FOOT SPECIFCATION SECTON 71
5 REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL MEET THE REQU REMENTS OF FOOT
SPECIF CATIONS SECTION 706
6 ALL S GNS WITHIN FOOT R GHT OF WAY SHALL MEET THE REQU REMENTS OF FOOT
SPECIF CATIONS SECTION 700
7 REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE PLACED N ACCORDANCE W TH FOOT
STANDARD INDEX NO 17352
8 STRIPING WITHIN FOOT RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE W TH
FOOT STANDARD NDEX NO 17346
9 S GNS WITH N FOOT R GHT OF WAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED N ACCORDANCE W TH
FOOT STANDARD NDEX NO 11860 AND SHALL BE PLACED N ACCORDANCE WITH
FOOT STANDARD NDEX NO 17302
10 S GN NG AND STRIPING WITHIN FOOT R GHT OF WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
W TH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFF C CONTROL DEV CES (MUTCD)
11 ALL WORK PERFORMED W TH N THE FLOR DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT ON
RIGHT OF WAY CONFORM TO
A) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICAT ONS
FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDIT ON) (aka STANDARD
SPECS)
B) FLOR DA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT ON ROADWAY AND TRAFF C
DESIGN STANDARDS CONSTRUCTION MA NTENANCE AND UT LIlY OPERAT ONS
FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ON STATE MA NTAINED SYSTEMS (LATEST
EDIT ON) (aka STANDARD NDEX) COMPLIANCE W TH ALL APPL CABLE
NO CES S REQUIRED
C) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATON MANUAL OF UNIFORM M NIMUM
STANDARDS FOR DES GN CONSTRUCT ON AND MA NTENANCE FOR STREETS AIND
HIGHWAYS (LATEST EDITION) (aka GREEN BOOK)
12 TRAFFIC CONTROL & SIDEWALK CLOSURE ARE TO BE PER FOOT ND CES #600 AND
#660
13 APPLICANT MUST NOTIFY THE FLOR DA DEPT OF TRANSPORTAT ON PINELLAS COUNTY
MA NTENANCE OFFICE (48) HOURS N ADVANCE OF START NG PROPOSED WORK
CALL (727) 570 5101
14 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION S TO BEGIN THE APPL CANT SHALL DEL VER TO THE FLOR DA
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION PROOF OF NSURANCE VER FY NG THAT THE APPLICANT OR
THE APPL CANT S CONTRACTOR HAS COVERAGE UNDER THE LAB L TY NSURANCE
POLICY N ACCORDANCE W TH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FA C RULE CHPT
14 96 007(5)(C)6
CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBILITY NOTE
T S THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIB L TY TO PERFORM A SURVEY (ACCOMPAN ED BY
THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER) OF THE ENT RE PROJECT AREA INCLUDING BUILD NG(S)
AND SITE IMMEDIATELY UPON OCCUPYING THE WORK AREA AND BY PHOTOGRAPHIC
AND WR TTEN CORRESPONDENCE DETA LING ANY AREAS THAT ARE NOT N A FIRST
CLASS CONDIT ON (SURFACES THAT ARE UNBROKEN NON CRACKED NON RUSTING
WTHOUT CH PS WTHOUT SPL NTERS OF TEXTURE MATCHING TS SURROUND NG
WTH NEW APPEARING F N SHES AND OPERAT NG AS OR GINALLY DES GNED OR
INTENDED TO OPERATE) WHICH W LL REMAIN IN THEIR PRESENT COND T ON AT THE
CONCLUSION OF THE PROJECT THE CONTRACTOR W LL BE RES PONS BLE FOR PROV D NG
THE OWNER A COMPLETE PROJECT N FIRST CLASS CONDITION MEETING NDUSTRY W DE
STANDARDS IN QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA
BU LD NG(S) AND S TE (REGARDLESS OF WHETHER AN AREA IS SPECIFICALLY DENTIF ED
WTHIN THE DRAWINGS AND SPEC FICATIONS OR NOT) UNLESS A PART CULAR AREA HAS
BEEN DESCR BED N THE AFOREMENT ONED PHOTOGRAPHS AND WR TTEN DETA LS
CONTRACTOR HAS THE RESPONS B L TY TO PROTECT THE EX ST NG BU LD NG(S)
UTILITIES AND S TE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT T ME FRAME SHOULD DUR NG THE
COURSE OF THE WORK ANY AREA OF THE BUILD NG(S) AND/OR UT L TIES AND/OR
THE BUILDING(S) AND/OR UT L TIES AND/OR THE S TE BECOME DAMAGED AND THAT
AREA WAS NOT SPECIF CALLY CALLED OUT TO BE A PART OF THE CONSTRUCT ON THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE DAMAGED AREA TO THE SAT SFACT ON
OF THE ARCH TECT AND OWNER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER
WATER SUPPLY
STORM SEWER
ELECTR CAL POWER
RRIGATION L NES
F BER OPT C CABLES
F RE ALARM SYSTEM CABLES
CONTROL WIR NG
SAN TARY SEWER
NATURAL AND LP GAS LINES
RECLAIMED WATER SUPPLY
T V CABLES
TELEPHONE CABLES
SECUR TY W R NG
S TE UNDERGROUND MECHANICAL
SYSTEMS NCLUD NG NSULAT ON
T W LL BE THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONS BIL TY TO DETERM NE THE SPEC F C LOCAT ON
OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICES BY CAREFUL HAND EXCAVATON ONLY UNLESS
OTHER MEANS ARE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT AND OWNER BEFORE BEG NN NG THE
WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR PER SPEC F CAT ONS ANY
AND ALL DAMAGED UNDERGROUND SERV CES AS LISTED ABOVE AT NO ADD TONAL
COST TO THE OWNER
TRENCH EXCAVAT ON
INCLUDE OSHA STANDARD 29 CFR SECTION 1926 650 SUBPART P WH CH IS
NOW A PART OF LAWS OF FLOR DA CHAPTER 90 96
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WR TTEN ASSURANCE OF COMPL ANCE
WITH THIS LAW
A SEPARATE COST ITEM DENT FY NG THE COST OF COMPL ANCE
A TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEM SHALL BE DES GNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER
2 ALL RETENTION AREAS STORM SEWER P P NG STORM SEWER STRUCTURES ETe
MUST BE N PLACE AS PART OF THE FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCT ON
IT S THE RESPONSIBIL TY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ACCOMMODATE POSTVE
DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO AVO D FLOOD NG OF THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES ANY FLOOD NG THAT MAY OCCUR DUE TO H S WORK W LL BE
THE SOLE RESPONS BIL lY OF THE CONTRACTOR
3 THE USE OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED DATA S INTENDED FOR INFORMAT ONAL
PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR
MUST UTILIZE S GNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCT ON
PAVING NOTES
1 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCT NG CONCRETE PAVEMENT THE CONTRACTOR S TO SUBM T A
PROPOSED JOINTING PATTERN TO THE OWNER S ENG NEER FOR APPROVAL
2 THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A 1/2 B TUMINOUS EXPANS ON JO NT MATER AL
WITH SEALER AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE
3 ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE MADE W TH TRAFFIC PAINT N ACCORDANCE
TO FDOT STANDARD SPECIF CATIONS 971 12 PARK NG STALL STR P NG
TO BE 4 WIDE PA NTED WHITE STR PES
4 THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL EXTRA BASE MATER AL WHEN THE DISTANCE
BETWEEN THE PAVEMENT ELEVAT ON AND THE TOP OF THE P PE OR BELL S LIESS
THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES
5 STANDARD INDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FOOT ROADWAY AND
TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS
6 PAVEMENT IN THE PROPERTY SHALL CONS ST OF 1 1/2 ASPHALT
TYPE MEET NG CURRENT FOOT STANDARDS ON 6 L MEROCK BASE COMPACTED TO
98% OF MAXIMUM DENS TY ON SUB BASE COMPACTED TO 98% OF MAXIMUM
DENS TY PER AASHTO T 180
7 PAVEMENT IN ROW SHALL CONS ST OF 2 ASPHALT lYPE MEET NG CURRENT FOOT
ON 8 L1MEROCK BASE COMPACTED TO 98% OF MAXIMUM DENSllY
STANDARDS ON 10 1/2 SUB BASE STAB L ZED TO 40 LBR AND COMPACTED lTO
98% OF MAX MUM DENS TY PER AASHTO T 180
NOTE TO CONTRACTOR
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFIED RECORD DRAW
INGS S GNED AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
THE RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW F NAL GRADES FOR
RETENTION BASIN(S) CONTROL STRUCTURE(S) NLETS
& PIPES WITH TOP & BOTTOM ELEVATIONS INVERTS &
DIMENSIONING OF SLOT & BAFFLE LOCATIONS OF ALL UT LIT ES
INCLUD NG THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER P P NG THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE CERTIFIED
RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENG NEER
THE AFOREMENTIONED RECORD DRAWING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT
ENOUGH IN DETAIL TO BE ACCEPTABLE BY AGENCIES HAV NG
JURISD CTION
..
J
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
I_Vi
ALL THE WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WTH THE REGULATIONS AND ORD NANCES OF
THE VAR OUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENC ES HAV NG JUR SD CT ON OVER THE WORK
2 ALL ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM NORTH AMER CAN VERT CAL DATUM( 1988)
3 LOCAT ONS ELEVAT ONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIST NG UT L T ES STRUCTURES
AND OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORD NG TO THE BEST NFORMAT ON AVA LABLE
AT THE T ME OF PREPARAT ON OF THESE PLANS THE CONTRACTOR W LL VER FY
THE LOCAT ONS ELEVAT ONS AND D MENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UT L TIES
STRUCTURES AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECT NG TH S WORK PR OR TO CONSTRUCT ON
4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE PLANS FOR CONFL CTS AND D SCREPANC ES
PR OR TO CONSTRUCT ON THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FY THE OWNER S ENGINEER
OF ANY CONFL CTS OR 0 SCREPANC ES BEFORE PERFORM NG ANY WORK N THE
AFFECTED AREA
5 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERC SE EXTREME CAUT ON N AREAS OF BUR ED
UT L T ES AND SHALL PROV DE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOT CE TO THE VARIOUS
UT L TY COMPAN ES N ORDER TO PERMIT MARK NG THE LOCAT ONS OF EX ST NG
UNDERGROUND UT L T ES N ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCT ON BY CALL NG SUNSH NE
AT 1 800 432 4770 M N MUM OF 2 DAYS AND MAX MUM OF 5 DAYS PR OR TO THE
START OF CONSTRUCT ON THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONS BLE FOR CONTACT NG ALL
UT L T ES NOT INCLUDED N THE SUNSH NE PROGRAM
6 CONTRACTOR S SOLELY RESPONS BLE FOR CONSTRUCT ON SAFETY
SPEC AL PRECAUT ONS MAY BE REQU RED N THE VC N TY OF
POWER L NES AND OTHER UTL TIES
7 ALL UNDERGROUND UT LITIES MUST BE N PLACE AND TESTED AND NSPECTED PR OR
TO BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCT ON
.\tJ
..
8 T S THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONS B L TY TO BECOME FAM LAR W TH THE PERM T
AND NSPECT ON REQU REMENTS OF THE VAR OUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENC ES THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTA N ALL NECESSARY PERM TS PR OR TO CONSTRUCT ON AND
SCHEDULE NSPECT ONS ACCORD NG TO AGENCY NSTRUCT ON
9 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBM T FOR APPROVAL TO THE OWNER S ENG NEER SHOP
DRAW NGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED TEMS FOR TH S S TE
FA LURE TO OSTA N APPROVAL BEFORE NSTALLAT ON MAY RESULT N REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR S EXPENSE ALL SHOP DRAW NGS ARE TO BE
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CONTRACTOR PR OR TO SUSM TTAL TO THE
OWNER S ENG NEER
10 AT LEAST THREE (3) WORK NG DAYS PR OR TO CONSTRUCT ON THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL NOT FY THE ENG NEER AND APPROPR ATE AGENC ES AND SUPPLY THEM W TH
ALL REQU RED SHOP DRAW NGS THE CONTRACTOR S NAME START NG DATE
PROJECTED SCHEDULE AND OTHER NFORMAT ON AS REQU RED ANY WORK
PERFORMED PR OR TO NOT FY NG THE ENG NEER OR W THOUT AGENCY NSPECTOR
PRESENT MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR S
EXPENSE
BACKF LL MATER AL SHALL BE SOL DLY TAMPED AROUND P PES N 6 LAYERS UP
TO A LEVEL OF AT LEAST ONE FOOT ABOVE THE TOP OF THE P PE N AREAS TO
BE PAVED BACKF LL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% MAX MUM DENS TY AS
DETERM NED BY AASHTO T 99
12 S TE WORK CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A COMPRESS VE STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 3000
P S IN 28 DAYS UNLESS OTHERW SE NOTED
EB #5936
,
~ t
~ 0
C '-!
~ ~
~ Z
~ -
~ ~
III
.. III
t I
I ~
t Z
III
, III
.. e
III. '^
C :z:
~ I-
~ ~
I 0
.. l/I Z
. :
l-
X
...
t
X
o
~
-
>
X
...
.. :z:
. \I
I III
. I-
...
..
...
-
.
t
I
III
.
"
Z 1ft
- It: ·
Z oC t
Z C M
. ID .
.. lD a
D. I,. ~
~ ~ g
Z ,.....
o.
. l~ Ii
.. :J III
I. I-
0,. .
c ~
......,~
- .
~ ~:
v I' \I
.
NES Comm
Drawn By
Checked By
13 ALL PR VATE AND PUBL C PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THE WORK SHALL BE RESTORED
TO A COND T ON EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EX ST NG COND TONS UNLESS
SPEC F CALLY EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS ADD TONAL COSTS ARE NC DENTAL TO
OTHER CONSTRUCT ON AND NO EXTRA COMPENSAT ON S TO BE ALLOWED
14 ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED ARE TO BE SEEDED AND
MULCHED TO DOT STANDARDS AND MA NTA NED UNT L A SAT SFACTORY STAND OF
GRASS ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENG NEER OF RECORD HAVE
BEEN OBTA NED ANY WASHOUTS REGRAD NG RESEED NG AND GRASSING WORK
AND OTHER EROSION WORK REQU RED WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR
AT H S EXPENSE UNTIL THE SYSTEM S ACCEPTED FOR MA NTENANCE BY THE
REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENG NEER OF RECORD
Issue Date:
ReVISions:
II
03/25/ ~
No Date DescriptiO r
& 06/05/08 PER DRe
D / /
D / /
D / /
D / /
D / /
D / /
15 THE SO LS ENG NEER S TO SUPPLY THE ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL
COMPACT ON TESTS AND ASPHALT RESULTS THE SO LS ENG NEER S TO CERT FY
TO THE ENG NEER OF RECORD N WR T NG THAT ALL TEST NG REQU REMENTS
REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTAT ON (FDOT) FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS AS REQU RED BY THE
ENG NEER NG CONSTRUCT ON DRAW NGS HAVE BEEN SAT SF ED
16 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MA NTA N A COpy OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND PERM TS
AT THE CONSTRUCT ON S TE
17 THESE DRAW NGS DO NOT NCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCT ON
SAFElY THE CONTRACTOR S SOLELY RESPONS BLE FOR MEANS AND METHODS FOR
CONSTRUCT ON S TE SAFETY
18 ALL SODD NG SEED NG AND MULCH NG SHALL NCLUDE WATER NG AND
FERT L ZAT ON THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONS BLE FOR MA NTA N NG THESE
AREAS UNT L THE PROJECT S COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER
~
LU
I-
Z
LU
U
.....
c:c
z
o
-
U)
U)
LLI
LL.
o
~
a-
U)
=-:::
c:c
o
~
o
.:a
~
c:c
::r:
19 ALL P PE LENGTHS ARE PLUS OR M NUS P PE MEASUREMENTS ARE CENTER TO
CENTER OF STRUCTURES OR F TT NGS P PE MEASUREMENTS FOR M TERED END
SECT ONS ARE TO END OF P PE
20 EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAW CUT WHERE NEW PAVEMENT S TO BE ADDED
OR EX ST NG PAVEMENT TO BE ElIM NATED
21 ADJUSTMENTS OF INLETS JUNCT ON BOXES MANHOLE TOPS WATER VALVES WATER
METERS ETC SHALL BE NCLUDED N THE CONTRACTOR S B D AND NO CLA M
SHALL BE MADE AGA NST THE OWNER OR ENG NEER FOR THESE ADJUSTMENTS
F REQU RED
22 ALL BACKF LL OVER ANY P PE (STORM SEWER SAN TARY SEWER OR WATERL NES)
THAT S NSTALLED UNDER ROADWAYS OR W TH N THE EMBANKMENT OF THE ROADWAY
SHALL BE COMPACTED N ACCORDANCE WTH F DOT STANDARD SPEC F CAT ONS
SECT ON 125 8 3 LATEST ED T ON
23 THE CONTRACTOR PERFORM NG TRENCH EXCAVAT ON N EXCESS OF 5 FEET N DEPTH
SHALL COMPLY WTH THE OCCUPATONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADM NISTRATON S
(OSHA) TRENCH EXCAVAT ON SAFETY STANDARDS 29 C FRS 1926 650 SUBPART P
NCLUD NG ALL SUBSEQUENT REVS ONS OR UPDATES TO THE STANDARDS AS
ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (DLES)
24 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE PO NTS OF CONNECTIONS OF THE UT L T ES W TH
o FFERENT SUBS S TE CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT THE UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURES
e SAN TARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER L NES F RE L NES ETC TO 5 OUTS DE
OF THE BLDG(S) THE PLUMB NG CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT AND MEET THE NVERT
ELEVAT ONS OF THE SA D UT L T ES ANY UT L lY WORK PERFORMED W TH N 5 OF THE
BLDG SHALL BE THE RESPONS B L TY OF THE PLUMB NG CONTRACTOR ALL WORK
SHALL COMPLY W TH ALL APPL CABLE FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL CODES
ORD NANCES AND REQU REMENTS
25 ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AND F N SHED N A WORKMANLIKE MANNER TO
COMPLETE SAT SF ACT ON OF THE ARCH TECT /ENGINEER N ACCORDANCE W TH
THE BEST RECOGN ZED TRADE PRACT CES
26 DEV AT ONS TO THESE PLANS AND SPEC FICAT ONS W THOUT CONSENT OF THE ENG NEER
MAY BE CAUSE FOR THE WORK TO BE UNACCEPTABLE DEV AT ONS SHALL RECE VE
WR TTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENG NEER
27 SIGNS BUFFER WALLS & FENCES ARE SUBJECT TO SEPARATE SUBM TTAL(S) AND
PERM TT NG DEV ATIONS SHALL RECE VE WR TTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER
28 T S THE RESPONS B LlY OF THE OWNER TO MA NTA NAND VER FY PERM T APPROVAL(S)
AND EXP RAT ON DATES SHOULD THE PROJECT NOT BE COMPLETED W TH N THE
PERM TTED T ME T S THE OWNER1S RESPONS BILlYTO F LE FOR EXTENS ON REQUESTS
W TH THE AGENC ES HAV NG JUR SD CT ON OVER THE PROJECT AREA
Q!ji)
~
@
c::::=J
P
~
@
c=J
~
c=J
@
~
~
Q!ji)
~
p
c=J
Q!ji)
d
c=J
~
c=J
@
II
II
"'I
"'I
If"
Y')
I
.0
.0
......
Y')
Y')
z(
O~
~~
~3
<(.L.
J:~
I-"u
0:::<(
2~
V):r:::
<(
o"u
O..J
..J
II
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SER.VICE AND SHAll REMA N TIiE PROPER.TY OF THE
ENGINEER. AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT
THE CONSENT OF 1liE ENG NEER. eCOPYRIGHT 2008 NOT PUBL SHED
II
0r::l LV
~UD(::J
RAM A. GOEl Ph.D., P E #47431
COPIES OF 1liESE PlANS ARE NOT VAl D UNLESS
EMBOSSED WI1li THE SIGNING ENGINEERS SEAl
0\
21
I ~l
I i ;=; \
I EXIST. I ~ i
I GROUND \ e: i
II i I
: ::'5 ,"I I I
! ~~; T BARRIER DETAIL ! I I!
. 0.. I I 'k
2! I ~
m , J
R i I
: I ! /35 ',f)
: X,"" x_<;oo ALL E N (P) """"' ,,,,c, '" u I c I '8 -, PCp. {",;;'
l ____c.... ._____________c__. . _ . _ , c... ....... .. ..c.~A.. g lVQ~!~., D~~LyEJ]iL- _' .. ._c___'" ... ,c .' E~~U''ihg);ffY2'''j<~-=g~-~-.=~/ ....-..--:--- c...... - .--- --
n ! I "I I
I I ~~-J ' I
H II"!\' EL " :,18 ':il" fil 5TOI'<'-I MANHOLE : , ~J.L
1 ~. jJ~V. EL :;;;,.~'\.8;~ M RiM EL :;:- 3.176 (22' ASPH'~L r) j J "', ttJD OF PiPE
" :"'J lNV r'_-- J18111.. I r;.-<'E1N\:C:L=.::e8S l . --NOfFI':LI!,.[1 ~ ...
~~~(;I';~~ E~2:i.:,~i~PV~'-"":--- .__--OR- _--B-.-..... Iia-.....' ---.- -----~).... ......~~::':.-.....-_'1iiiB ......-liiiif._ ..... ... r------,Or--- - 3- - --.----,- - ,.--.. -.--..2 ' .,.-.- .- ...-..-.- ___.u -.--..., -.-.-- . ..-- -. ',~11:-~:;:J~~H~E~~9: .--.-- - .,.-- . _w____ . -..--,- - ..---- , u.,__ - --...~ -- .---- - -.--- -- __u_ - --.-- ~--.---
j I vi. ~\:c \N~nk--- t>~JS~H.JI~ (-."__ ,- I N H.J\' EL -- 3/1.2
.. "'" "" ".n" ... "'" 1,~,:,: :'.s: l - ~ u ut ;.f; 'd::; n ::c::-;c.:J!i!',:;~^,:,;;;"':': :c'.t',n ~: =-...::::: :-I cc:: c;: =- _nn c: ;=--= ::t = = = = = .::;::c -;- - _ -, -:::- -:.c ]-== :n- -=:"<.:'::~~': }::::.:-:_ -":::":::'::::n_ ::::: ::: n F"~~::.;. ,~.:c~;~~:;: c:: -n:: m _u _.' .. .' .... _ n .. _n C C - nnm ..' n. C .. . .' p .. II r
-. '" -.- """ .----. "".\--.- 0'" .-~ --,~,1<""--~"""--=_....:=::.--=.J!!"'~~-,-~~.~-~----3".-'..,-- J --._"!!!.'~ ~,~~-_-~-~ __ ...~- ...~ ...,,-~ ~--~ ------......... - ~- ~ ~~ ,__~__L - ---~...~~~--..2!!!' ~~=--= !Lo.;.:;.. - --~- """-,,,,,," -~-~.>F'''''''''''-1!llr'''''-~=-';----=-=-'-;----=-=--;- .=~.::- -- -.' . ---.- - --,-,--. --.-...- -.-----lJ I
\ 1 /</'fl _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _' I I _ --.. :: ,"" '"v 0''''"1' .--- c.,,, --.,-- ,~", .u._ ,",,' .-.- 'm --.- "'" -- -. "j _.-
I // ; I' 2 ---I~ ---------;1--- /L'_,:'~ ------- 334.60-: N -89.57,2;'-;------- --- ";~nr"-~ 1____________ !.
I _ _ - - - - - -, - - - - -
~<34_70 .>::3500 );:"'35.40
II \" / ;l5.t~LM -4 '- .. \ I I
I I Ii \ '--./ ~ ------..- ' II
tl I \./ - /' _____ 1\ il
M .. _ ./ 3S8r, ~ I \ \
M I m ~ ./, \ ./ '""' , / " ]2' PAll" I I
.! : ./ I" \ /./ " (\ "'r-t-- i\1
wnee .. inlt,_; ~ I' / : ' ~''"': / '\ _\,~:::; ii.'"" 1\( 1 1; \ \
B I I,n,~ / \ ~ \.... .. - - ~ ~ I / \ , ,,,I ~ i 'I
I II J I / \ /./,/ \ '-J. 3:,\] / ~\ ~g..,,~/ m;+f'~ !i~~""~ I \ \ \
R ,'1'-" ~ I" I ,'~3"Co.}la'^v I / "5,'''; I " 35'",8, :/3"''i I 1\ \ '
m . ~ I . "' I PALM CWSW? 4-5V 35.".". ,.... . ...U' I I
! ~ \ ' '1" 3870 I \ 1/ ~ ' I
: I N 1>('35,40 '\ :<356,( "/, / ./ ;.;,~<;'>\:3:~2,1 :3]:1~~C,.1' I ~,.;~]JdA\~'Y5D ll;' \ ;\~7~ALM~ , \ ,~~ \ \
'. ~ _ 1././ 3S.GO~' \.><3948 >:...:< /3527 \ ~ 5~:~~,f( _ ~\ ~ \ \
I II ~ \ f - - 7 - - -:\0 ;0 '54~"'.'7 52 \ {/'~' 1\( 0,'.',.'.0' a eN ~J""C i \
I I \ II ~1f5.~2 J59~~ \ :1::,.70 1t"1 ~Y - ,~ .eN ," Cl::: \ I
)( ,. f~.1~AL' ,<
',b,50 )< J~ Ot~ \
55:>.:<",... I ...... 3'525 /-. ~'S.24 \ II
c.,:. 1: . \ /J5.l:'~; )::35.30
j,J.f:,2' .~. '-"'9 . ~c::;.,
,." UcO \ /
~I I ~ 1---:1 2 \ II ", // ':W;' t tr) \\.b
"'Z I I \.... . 14"' P"L1-1 \'
...J / " / / \ ~ ,e.,
I I "/'./ -,' , ' i:
I! " '""'./... \ -J 1\
I II II ~ '_././ -_____--/' I , Ii
I II : ~ -----/' I \ -J \1
. I I il . ' lu \ \
m I I : I'f' 5 "I' 'J~{''; CLUSTCR 4-5 ~. r#/~ALM ,Ii: -., 1\ \1
EXI:)TINC-__,.::_ ~I I 1~. ~I ^"" Xh"",",,";'" )("",; ~~~ .~ ,~ \ ~ 11\ \\\
~ ""I 1 * r~.5~"L1' I --
I
I I r X"" I \ \ I
: II r '>20 Mil II
I t Ii ~ >'.3S11 I'LlD'JTiOf, // I I \ I
I' 3.~../~ /' / -". --'" ". '''i~''-l:;:lj' ""..' ow ,I I .,"".. \ \
~ "1 J? ~"" -~~--""--~1 '2 " 'w- >:':\ ;/;;C':''' "- - '~r~f? H f-----",,, >m' ""~"';' -- n_ \1
ill .j' k,q . ""'~375" 5 89.5 1 \--/-'-1 135.00'_ \2 P\!G.__ -::: :::::-'::'-'1 U ~\ /~ I \
I ! 11'-')\"11:./'" .. 18' U,\j( i 3,,98 \ \ \ ,_- ----' - -- ':',:::: ::::::::: ----.- "37.i?;< ,,} "~'I!-=====:===-":===:----'-'--'-'--:===:---------'>> ..1 \';
." 14 P",\-; [j:::J JC::.:.__J .
"I ...., ><25 is - 1'1 GRA'iE !NLET ,/ 37.24 . ..---.----.-----..-----'1 <1,: I
;.~.3.tj.90 G!~.t.:,lE [~. :-= 37.'1':'. j
'<:,~---- POI\jD " I iN\! EL = 35.45 I \
./ . '-. ._'"'>:'3~_Bl j ] 37 ~:S I,
I! ~~=~='~==~~===:=:':=::f='''''' '\:;;;:' I '0>" nil' "'" .. '" \
~ r ~II' I 1,1 Ii
ml
i '.Ji I I
~ i ~ll Ii! STOP)' Jli/OOD rPAME I
',';"-~.' 'I --"'~"':'III I I',' .1'
'~ (~~'C)i~d/vlj-~/7C'/l\L
1;11 I <;77l I ,I
I L, I I E
,,,, II ' I """",,; ·
"I,.iHt' //11 '. --, Y:';7 i,,,':
!.
DEMOLITION NOTES
DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE REMOVAL/RELOCATION
OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHiN THE PROJECT AREA,
PAVING AND BASE, UTILITIES LINES (SANITARY SEWER, STORM
PIPES, WATER LINES, POWER POLES, OVERHEAD AND UNDER-
GROUND POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS LINES, TREES,
SHRUBS, ETC,) AND is NOT LIMITED TO WHAT'S SHOWN,
OR
DEMOLITION NOTES
DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES
THE REMOVAL/RELOCATION OF
ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN
PROJECT AREA, PAVING AND
BASE, UTILITY LINES (SANITARY
SEWER, STORM PIPES, WATER
LINES, POWER POLES, OVERHEAD
AND UNDERGROUND POWER AND
TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS LINES,
TREES, SHRUBS, ETC.) AND IS
NOT LIMITED TO WHAT'S SHOWN,
LEGEND
REMOVE:
~
ASPH, & BASE
OJ
[I]
REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT & BASE
REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK
o REMOVE EXISTING CURB
~ REMOVE EXISTING TREES
4
ALL CAVITY & EXCAVATION RESULTING FROM REMOVAL OF
TREES, SHRUBS, PIPES, INLETS, GREASE TRAPS, SIGN,
AND POLE BASE SHALL BE FILLED WITH APPROVED
SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED IN 12" LIFTS TO
95% OF MAX DENSITY.
5
OFF-SITE DISPOSAL OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES AND
CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL OCCUR IN SOLID WASTE
DISPOSAL FACILITIES APPROVED BY F.D,E,P" AND
PINELLAS COUNTY.
'<::( 1:=1 "
~ I,
-J e;
~f. \
\
,
\
\
i
I
\
\
\
i
\
c! \ c:;
i
i
NElJ RETENTION POND
,.wI
I
\
I
I
I
I
J... .."----.
;~: ':i:i (,;.'!
)', =~-j !?
NOTE:
SILT FENCES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION AND BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE PROJECT.
.--
-' 24.'1 /t'C'F' --.--."
j-,~ i~1'i-/
N 89048 '45" [
rr462s.:. ~j"~"
,- "'. 34.88""'- .
, .:l..~,4~'
(,.\
~".j
UJ\
,
,
\1 <".! I'.J vtf( T = :;C,4f,
EX i'vti-!-:, ,-/.. E.;: 18' PCP '-'.,
.....// ~'______'l-
34 5(i AC ~ \ -'/3'3 ''"17 -,,, '.1
j '"'\\ ," ' J -='_0,'':'-'",<
I \
I \;:520
I \
I
\
i
\
\
\
!
,
I
I
:i 3~1b I
I I
: I
k
. I
~I
rr" ,
I I
I I
k
~I
~ I x"
U !8' pCP \{: II
I
I I
I I I
: L -4)3D:J
'~I::, ,ilL! II
...,. --!!,.... - -"
/ >:'.:: 'L-P
I 5 89051 '21" W
I 42.94'
\'~;
\
I
I
1....
"1 ACKNOWLEDGE THE PLACEMENT & LOCA TlON OF ALL MEASURES THIS PLAN REQUIRES
TO CONTROL TURBIDITY &- EROSION FOR THIS SITE. THIS PLAN SHALL BE MADE
A VAILABLE TO SITE CONTRACTOR" DATE:
(HOUSH GHOVAEE)
\
i
;\;'''-' ':.;
I
I
\
!
\
,
I
,
,
I
i
,
\
\
\
I
-
I
I
\
,
\
-J
NOTE:
SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE TRENCHED IN WHERE
ADJACENT TO TREES DESIGNA TED TO REMAIN
THE SIL T FENCE MUST BE SECURED THROUGH THE
PLACEMENT OF FILL OVER THE LOWER LIP OF THE
THE LOWER LIP OF THE BARRICADE
\
\,
;"',":;:4 :31":,
I
I~
I~
~
0:::
POST OPTIONS:
2"x4" OR 2.S"DIAM.
WOOD; 1.33LBS./FT.
MIN. STEEL
FILTER FABRIC IN
CONFORMANCE WITH
SEC. 985 F. D. O. T.
SPECS. OR EOUAL
EXIST.
GROUND
i
i
i
i
\
~j \
U) L;',
;"{
lL
\
I
\
.>.:~5 jJ
l--
I.
6' MAX.
,
i
i
\
t:,3~;.U!J> :)523
I
I
,
;
I
I
I
I~,"
I';() J.
.,"
I~
la
Fe
o
(~
\
'\
I.
,.
2
CJ
;
\
i
\
I,
:€!
DI
!l;;!
0::\
~: .1<:j~;,~1J)
-J
"
;:::
If)
X
I..1.J
lu
:<::
/'3t~.rn
-
>-~l,i. '
Q.
[/F'
--
_MiIII!li..P,1\!I'H MI,f'!I(INc;
(Ti'P)
:;;.tiJ\JiTp-.l(,( M!\NH\)LE
F<!r',1 EL ::;: ,-$":\,24
y~. IN\!, t~L ~ .3186
EI<ISTING ij,TER,;L .--
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I.JI"'!'I,]r; fj" C',
'_"j~" I \..:. ~ '.."'"
,
I
~ I
~~I
~ ~!
~ a I
~ V) I
~~
~~
~~
~~
aN
V)
~ ~
~a
~ ~ I
~ ~:
~ N I
I
N ~ I
~ a I
aV)
k.
I
I
I
I c--
Vi
112
~
$
-',
11'::.
,
I
I
(2t A'SPI'!ALT'i
--
><3424
. <~r:J.r~5
35,71)
, ,
36.S5.~,
S' PAL""
.......
./
;:< ~~~Uli)
><-34,:,)9
"..;"J4 '3~1
3':', ~!j}
I
I
II
I
I
g
~
II
I
.
I
m
II
~
~
m
m
m
~
~
~
_.- '[,-:"j'
SCALE: 1 "=20'
l.SPH.^.L r PM',.iI..;C
20
o
10
20
,
J.
I_tii
".
"
.~
..
EB #5936
.
"
~. E
o~
ClCl-
I .J
~,
~ S
...., III
..... t
1"4 ·
..... ,
-, t
.11 'II
)(:11
~a
... "
_ C
V" .
~ ~
~ )
.. ~ t
. ~
...
Z
III
~
Z
o
"
>
Z
III
_ C
..... ,I
I"lII II
..... .
-
..
.
t
..
)-
'11
I J.
.
"
Z 1 \
- 0')
Z ~I,"
Z o:~
. a=.t
.. a= I,.
A. ... I'~
A :r:1;>
.. \1,1
Z ~18
. -1=
.. :r: II
I- I .8
=- .t
· 0;:
.. ~ 1=
~ 0'(
;;. 0 II
I ,I
U Nil l'
I NES Comm.: 0731
I Drawn By: N.E.A
I Checked By: H.G.
Issue Date:
Revisions:
NOt
03/25/~i]
o
O. ae eSCrlptlon
& 06/05/08 PER ORe
D, I /
D "
I /
D / /
D, / I
7\ I I
D, I /
i
!!
40
~
~
d
~
~
(;:::l
c:::::J
rJ!iV
~
@
c:::::J
(;:::l
c:::J
d
@
~
~
@
0:::
u.I
I-
Z
u.I
(.)
...I
c::c
Z
o
-
U)
U)
u.I
LI-
o
0:::
f:L.
U)
~
c::c
o
0:::
o
m
0:::
c::c
:c
~.. .::? L; :
i
><.3/.29
)/:':/29
-"<::,",' j'~
CF:.:..:f: ;N;,.;
r;p l,'~
RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P.E. #47431
COPIES OF TIiESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS
EMBOSSED WITIi THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL
('''I
('" I
'"l~ '
r" I
LII
LI I
r" ,
r" I
r" I
Z 41:'
o ~;!
!!! ,~:
ex:: rl
ex:: .:1
<( L1,
J: ,~:
I- LJI
ex:: In :
O~,
LL Ill:'
..... .
v; ,~;
Ill"
- "
o uil
0..1
-tl
@~D1
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN TIiE PROPERlY OF TIiE
ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANYWAY W1TIiOlJT
THE CONSENT OF TIiE ENGINEER. ~COPYR.IGHT 2008 NOT PUBLISHED
.
N 89"48'45" [
46.05'
rr--
x
I I
I I I
I x
~L:-_:J1
I 5 89051 '21" W
I 42.94 '
u" ;-',1" i?CP/-:"', I
EX MH-~\ '1
iNv~~i<T ~ 5['..-i5
C\ ,I,)'/-!
F/. 18 r' l~IC.[l..- -"'~'_
~ .
~_____'hiR
\
I
I
I I
I I
: Ix
k
. I
~IX
ft
\
\
\
\
\
!
i
!
NORTH
PARCEL=6,018
S.F.
2
C\
~
i=
l0
X
UJ
I I
~IX
~
.r_-,..' '" 0'0 f ~ ~
,'L \ f> ·
\1:
3'
o
c.:
co
n::
~
C'
'7
<
m
III
m
.
II
m
m
I
Ii!
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
II
I
I
~
\'I
II
I
Ii
I ~
1~:~-'-1;I'J~~--6~ V~~-;~F: - +--- FIRE TRUCK- -------- - ------- ------- - -- -------- --------- - ---------
I \l,. (TYP.) ~~~TI~~T~~--- ,I
lilt 1m _ _ w WiIi _ _ .. _ _ _ IB!: e m _ liS n ,. -i~.:j 2431.F. _ _ _ _ _J _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- - -- -~. ---- -----~~~~-:~~~~~~-~~~=:~~::-~::~~~~~~~~~
I /1
, ,.
./,' iii
,../ ~
./ /
t
CL
8
6' HIGH
CHAIN LINK FENCE
c.(
rD
~
<:
ill
L-
o
L
e-
ll.
o
----
!1-
C',
~:.
SOUTH
PARCEL=49,277 S.F.
STORt':1 t\,i.!'.~.jH:,)LE (2?' ,ASPH .';,,1 r)
_______ - [______-{~-~!~~~~~~'j:~~,~- ___-j__ __ ____ __ - ___on
(
CU1~B iNLET i
F;J!\.1 EL ;~ .)5,13 I
.[ .f~:_i!i;1*,2"~~:.~~~~c~/ _.= .....:...___ ..
II ~._ j !
II' 'Lt_
I "\" UJD OF PiPE
l\jOT l-1-:"'Ur.El
ALLEN (P)
MAGNOLIA DRIVE(F)
--,----------- --~-~_._,- -~--,_.~---'--' -,-~.- --"-, ------ ----.-.-- ~---,._--- -- ----_.--
EX" 1/3" PCP"--'-l
<:
2
~
[Q
~ ~
1vJ~
0)2
2]
'::i~
=tl::-t
.;u
"--c::
(")
"
f I
II
II
I I
II
II
I
I
II
I
- -
- -
334.60' N 89051 '21 " '[
~.-
- -
- -
- -
I
I
'-"I"l'll" "u ("
,.,/~ _-' I \ ,_~ 0 '. I.
I
\- P. rEI~~
~ I!
~
~ ~ I
'-2- E;: I
~ ~ I
~ a I
~ rf:l I
~~
~~
~~
~~
a~
rJ)
~~
~ a I
~~
~ ~ I
:J:: N I
I
~ ~ I
~ a I
a rJ) I
~ I
I
I
!
I
~
""-II
r-I
:-t'll
NEW 4' CONC.
WALK
"DO NOT ENTER"
SIGN
I
II: TRUNCATED DOMES
(TYP.)
NEW "STOP"
BAR
20 ')(20 I
SIGHT VIS/~ILTlY
TRIANGLE (TYP.)
I
: I
II
II
I
II "1 F!''-'"
II,
\, I
I~'
I
I .'
I ['/-' ~
\ I
\ :
, III
\~,J II
1=;\ R
~ I
~, B
~ I
. m
;
I
~
I
~
&
I
B
I
e
I
~
r;~~ n F:
'I:)
/
GI"",TE INLET /'
GF~,4T[ EL = .31.17
li\!\' E L e;:- ~'5.4E
---------------1
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
!
i
;
---~--, .l. SP1-PL r P .11,1;:1- iHC -'
PL~.HTER
,o.PE/\
! _~;' (C)r;'y ~1/1_)(){) ;~l~)/-ll !l!/~tt-..
I
I
!
i
I
I
J
i-I
(:~'C)f\divl ["/?('/.l\i_ /3/_// L
-- 5,-:)', ~~'_-
I
"
1:-'.:~,PH.;I.L 'j F L'}:h!!\;(~ -.--./
d";;,:': if:. :t~;,:
!-LIJ[.ir
~
I
I
1
xl
I~
~~
I
I
}~
~
xl C()
CJ
ICJ
xF
[~~~' ,q'3PH.A,L.'f)
~ i.\~ .--~
D
-.J
-
-q:
Ct::
I--
()
\
\
\
I
'I
I
I
\
I
I
I
\
i
c' i '..
I
i
NEW RETENTION POND
!;~~\
\
\
\
i
__..__t-- --.....---..
\
.Q-~\
tJj\
If)
-.::(
-J
-.J
;
\
\
,
D"J I
., \
li1 i
d.': I
(1. I
--- \
;;- !
Q-
,-"
-<::
Lu
:<:.
-
CL
(:0
I iJ
1 Ld
I
I
,.__"_ " ___ ..L------------..
--
,:,'Ii' ,'1-:1",
" I: I "( I~' i~:.' ,II, i_ )
-lllIi-i'-~;:~~ hl"PI(;I'l~,
rJ
. IJ111. - - .-.--- c"'" - .- :!-)~'
PARKING LOT
INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
TOTAL: 2,927 S.F.
--
--
--
SCALE: 1"=20'
, ~ t
J ~ 0
(
to "-
I"
~ I
... .. ~
UI
.. ,UI
~ Z
I -
I~ "
.. 'z
. UI
~ UI
... 8
I~til Iii '"
c :I:
I-
<lI ~
'D
I 0
.. , z
. ..
"lI
.. .. .:1:
Z ' v
I UI
... , I-
~ ....
..
II!!
Z .
0 t
. I
UI
..,\tJ >
z
III
.. .
"
Z 1ft
- ~ ~
Z .--
... ""
Z ( ""
. ~ .
.. <<= a
A. IhI ~
A :~ 0
'\ ."
Z I. ..
IhI
. Ja ..
~
.. :~ ...
~ l-
I. .
. nil
( ~
" ~
c .
c:J
, ,v
I !!!
NES Comm.: 073
I Drawn By: N.E.i
I Checked By: H.G
~
~
;~
o
10
20
Issue Date:
Revisions:
No. Date
03/25~ ~
.. .___" _.__ __ __u__ __ "._____ __ -~L+I-- __ __,_____ __ ------ .. -------- -- --- n___n - .... ._uu .. _n________ ____________u__.._.._ m__.__-.__ "
NEW 4' ~;: I CURB INLET
'-'II RIM [L ~ 5'".92
~,V:IS m),~ c,"__.. CONC. WALK '-, N IN'! EL = -"?12
_______ ---=-=-~~--~~-~--~~-==-!~~ ~~~~~=~i==--=-=-~--=--==-:==-=- --=-=~-g~~==it--==-::-=--.-:-~-=---- ==~--=---=----=--=- ----=-~= =- -- ------ ------- ---
f (J!0._Q~_J., Pr-L"<
0l$Ilt' _-__..-r._ _ __ tIlIJ,/;_-___Otmil ____181__.....-_.... ___-~..______ ~.......-... CIfA1 _____....a.;~.. 3JMr -- ~ liIOVo' l:Mr"iRillr~----~...----:4'1W ----~.iF.l' ml......- ~"IIIIIl::..~-==-ll;j;::-==-:--=--ili;;----:--===-..:--~~1 -=-== ----;~, --=----=--=- -(~I .---
, 20')(20'
i SIGHT VISIBILTlY
, TRIANGLE (lYP.)
L\_______\_<~-==::::::::=:.::=~::::-==--=::.:::.::=:::
, \1 \
\ I
I 1 I
\ \ '
I \ \
\ ' \
,_,1 I \ \
'::'\ I.. i ,
;:'~,\7' ~ \ \
',' ~ 1\1
! + I
"J, I \ \ \
..... .u' I \ \ \
\~-'1 t~ ~ \ II
\ ~ \
\\--t. ~: ;f -q: \ I
\ ;'t: ~tl ~ 0::: \. \
,le' .. n. \
I ~ I ';2 L \ I
'\".::l .~. .-- II
,-.. 1\
\ t' \:
IS' cP \:
,\:; i V) 1\
\~ i: \I\d
-.I \ -q: \ ;_.,
~"~ \ -1 II
I \ I i I
I \ I : I
\ \ \ -1 \ \
~ \1 \ \ \
! \'J I Lu i \
1015, \ :<:. \ i
. \ - II
\ \ \
< \ -i_I .' ';2(p,;;iJI1 I \ CL \ \
;: ~,4$" :., I \ \ i
, ~ .~; ; :: ,< I;: I \ \ II
1[;;7 .. .~... ....~ -=- .--:. .: ., - .~ .,:<= c..:..=:;.: ::iQSIW!,Bil'~~ y:-- - ,< -TREE BA~t~ ~~u '__ <.:.:..J \ \ \
rc== ..~~-- 0' """""-''';s- 89~51;:Z1 ;'w- -1' 1- --\ - ~j2 tDi3TU --+ _u_I\. II \ I
/ I' J
3'!(.~:'" // Ij I ..u__~\__ TREE CANOFYIROOT ZONE i \ \
.- .-.~:=-~=-.::::.::_-::=-)_______________i l_____ \ \
,". ~(r--- -l
I-" ". I I
'...../,
:,) I
r__...____....__c..==-==.~=___=_=_c...=c_=.:C"_=_.c_ ---/ ...:;. I
I '
,j
'f
1
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
;
\
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
I
Descriptio ~
& 06/05/08 PER DRe
6 / /
6 / /
6 I I
6 / /
^ / /
6 / /
ii
II
0::
LLI
I-
Z
LLI
(.)
...I
<C
z
0
-
U)
~ U)
LLI
~ LL. ("'-.I
("'-.I
d 0 ~
t'W')
~ I
0:: LI\
LI\
~ a- t'-..
t'W')
I'V')
~ U) 2'<(
c::::::::J ~ "0
(J!jf) 0_
<C ~a::
a~ 0
@) 0 a~ ...J
<( u.
~ 0:: l: ~
..... W
c::::::::J 0 O~
~
m ll.. ~
~ 0:: V1 a::
P <C C~ ~
(J!jf) ::I: C~ ...J
40 U
II
II
20
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERlY OF THE
ENGINEER. AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT
THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEElt ~COPYRlGHT 2008 NOT PUBLISHED
RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D.. P.E. #47431
COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS
EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL
@~D 1]
_,_._~ ,.,_,_"_,__",~,__"_,,,,,,,;~_,,,"_,,,,,,,,,,,,,",~_',"_'n"""'~~,",,",,'"H,,"'_~~'W;'".._"C'~",<_"""'U~~~~'~'~'."""~~'.._~-, "" ,,"--..~,.~,
>~-:J.' ,6U
'/J.:ci 77
P/L
\
i
I
\
\
i
i
~
\
\
[\:'\'
uJ
i
I
35.0:1: (ME)
6" THICK
CONCRETE
ON GRADE
- - - 34.50 A\
HW 34: c; GROUND
WQ 33.0
SHW 37.0
[",4" f('-P'-. I
\,.:.. ! L,l \t.,J ..- iN,,![PT == j['.46 E>..
cv Mi-;~' III ./'
_ 'J',/.'/~_ _ ~ ~ =':>__
3'-1 ]l' X:'" ..- \ ',/'~::; "'7 ~-t::. W
I \, -' J---.J i .)~,." i
I \\3::5 20
I \
I \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
-J
N 89048 '45" [
rr46.,gr. ~
,",,,.,.,n ^
, x o.cL X I
_5.42
X
VARIES
6' HIGH C.L.F.
10.5'
]4.3\.~
7' MIN.
5'
2'
NOTE: REMOTE Foe BY OTHERS.
TO PROVIDE ONLY
4" x 5" STORZ CONNECTION
AND 4" CHECK VALVE.
I
I
<31D I
I I
~ t
~
.1
~Ix
A fit'
~
~ Ix
~
NEW 36 LF OF-
6" PVC U.D.
@ 0%
D 18" F?CP--\ 'P r<
\l:
34.50
, TOB (ME)
J..!_---
I
I
NEW ASPHAL T
PA VEMENT
35.5 (ME)
I
I
\
\
I"",
>\'" _~:;,':)t
PROPOSED GROUND
r 5" STORZ CONNECTION
, PLACED AT A :sa ANGLE
. APP 36' ABOvr CRADE
, fROM FACE Of FOC.
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
XI
-
SECTION B-B
N.T.S.
\
I
\
4" CHECK VALVE
;
\
~
><~::<1 36
xl
I~
~~ A
~
xl~ ,m
.,
xlQ;:)
C)
I~
xF n "
'c::(
Ct:::
I--
~
SECTION A-A
N.T.S.
W.A.N.E. AERATION SYSTEM
TREE #30
36. OAK PLANT BED
CROSS SECTION D-D
N.T.S,
W.A.N,E. AERATION SYSTEM
TREE #30
36" OAK PLANT BED
CROSS SECTION E-E
N.T.S.
~,
\
I
.,
\
i
i
I
\
\
\
::t3500>~':'i5 23
\
i
~ ,=,
<1:
I if
--.a U'j
<(
GRADE
/351]
. i
r'
i~ I
1:. I,
lI) '>
~ \
\
\
I
I
\
\
P/L
----- 4" DUCTILE IRON PIPE
i
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
I
I
\
\
\
I
\
><34,
Q.
'if>
'"
4' DR-14 PIPE \
o
Z
i=
U}
X
CJ
lJ.J
<:
6.5'
i
(
i
I
i
i
I
~l
ho:l
~J
,:r:t'::35,:lO ;(36.03
0\
~\
<
m:
",I
DI
0:.1
21
I
I I 18" ME.S.
I W~01.~
'" "" CONTROL STRUCTURE
~ I I ~ (SEE DETAIL) I
~) I u...
~ / ~ fg~s,;c/~ Lt67~ _:' ~ ii,,,,,
A L L E N /P) "00 Ii''':, "'J' : I I 5 89.51'2,1" W
lJ J CI.',~B IULEr I I ~" "l _ X31~~" \ I 42.94
F:,"" ~~ = .3:..13 IE' I I (i RL F - l
_ _m:~ ~_ G fl_9~ I_~.__ I?_7R !_Y_~_{F2-------- ____nn_____. __________ __.~_~~~!~ ~ ~~ fi"tr:Q; '~~"~~"i'~'1 ~C=;~:'Rc-::v.::d' ~'l' ,,' u' ,u - ." -- - 'I'.
, ~"I' EX. 18 RCP INV. EL. 29.7 l ,"'"<' ,~ .. ' \
1'1 '-.1+.. 106 L.F."'0"F,Q:""P8",I,I'.LT;
STOfi:M MJi.NHOLE' . r
I RIM EL = 3,0176 (22' /'SPH,;LT) END OF PlloE , ,
_-cD')~~~V Y:_ = -;08~_____L. _ ____ __ ___no . ____no _ __un. _ u___.u_ ._ ______ ______ _ _____ '.. ._..___ ... r.-WI.,'.- _ ___ - _~~~~~T !O.<.:l.~D ._ -_ ._n_ _ ------- --,---- R~P._~~}i~____ u__ un __n__._ ___no .u ___u__ :-::::::"". ---....
- g- ,-, l{/'Q1P ) cld I
's:' CURB INLET --
I ,<:,11 Ril'A EL = 34.92 I 2'CURB
~_ ,._==.. " ,. :-:,':~"~; J1;~) _.::-,:=~==:'-=.:::=..c:W"'_ ,-~;' '''.,,', ,," ~:==:======::=I =::=~==::::::.:::.==,-=::.:=::::::::,:::::::::::.: f=j---=':-==-=':::=-i=-==':::-::
_ _~_____ ------0- _-__-1.. - _,""____ _..............0_ __________.... @n~?t~~._-_ ....,--..... -----~. ___----...---uu.-.n.----..-----..----...--..---.--------........-.__...1-- t
______-~ . Vll -- Ol<~' ---- I.'II~ - !JHW --- o,m -- OIHJ - ouy,; -~-- O<I\~ -- \)',ll''- --- ':.'Hr. ----~ () .-.---
~.~~I -
Bil<E__ _ ~ I
RACK T-\ r==-....=-:---=-..=:-. -:-.::..::..::.:.:.= :=--:-.::..::.-.-.=..::.::::.::..-==- -= -=---==-~=--=-"'::'.:::;=-*. --
. \ \
.), __ \ 1\
'/,~ I { \ \
0\$ 1\
I \ \
I \ ,
36j 't71 ~~~ \\
...! ~ \
..,.... 0.. ~ I
>< " i 5: Ct::: I
~ ItN';21-- \
~,~ --,- ~ \
.., ~ ~ '\
~(' t\t : \\~
4" ;~ ~ \.\
w..+ ~\. \ \
I lJ.J \\
;sf'" \1\ =\\
.,},_ 3(,,55 Q. \\1\\
~ . 12' P~Ll; I
I
_35~+ "~' \ \ \
\ \
\ \
I'
\
4..5'
2'
-J
I
U
':::
o
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
C'.' \ 0 ;::,
c
i
1
i
NE~l RETENTION POND
'_ TOP EL. 34.50
W BOT. EL. 31.00
I
I
\
\
\
!
_...._._ _________....--J..---...... --'"
--
NEW ASPHAL T
PAVEMENT
B
R
III
R
\I
II
I
II
REMOTE FOe DETAIL NTS
36.0 (ME)
-
SECTION C-C
c
><35,24
N.T. S.
\
I"
\-~;
\
NOTE. ROOF RUNOFF SHALL BE
DIRECTED TOWARD POND AREA.
><3~IS'i
120'
->< 35.,08
60'
~-PA!I";T MI:i,~~Klt\iG
(riP)
::'\/\1"11 T ARY MANHOLE -----~-,-----------------~ --.-----~-----------"-.-.----.--~------------.---------
Rlloei EL = :\5,'4 NEW 6")(6" T&V
Vi iN\!. EL = 3'186 Wj6" G.V.
tJ. IN.V ~L ,~ 3.1 ~~'lf' & CHLORINE
I ~': IN,' EL =)I.b~ INJECTION POINT
l'''' IN v, EL -- 31.6) II
.~B_am-l~~~~~:.:~:~~=~~~~
',' .,' _ -.. _''1- '"' ~'+,..--- - '/:-- ~ - --1,.- -- -- -- J-_ --- -;- - - --(t---
/./ II CHLORINE
. I II "
H /,. ifNE'f 6 PVC DR14 W.!!:jhNEW 6" PVC SAN. ·
I . 36 MIN. COVER SEWER @ 1%~/N. 90' BEN
I I _. __ 1-- -~
tTSTING LMH~AL -"-----'1_., <3550~~~ 6'~L: ~~ kFJ/2" .. itr:t;A~fff[/ V... .;.
'If I NEW 2" PVC (36" MIN. COVER) .
I . DaM. WA TER I " "in ·
I . (36" MIN. COVER) NEW 4 PVC DRI4F.... ·
SP (36" MIN. COVER)
I .-"-
I FIRE DEPARTMENT
''''''':--'' I Medical ~:~~~~E
I '---~ 1 st Floor:
R 0 YJ23 S.F 0
I ppE-3Z3
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
B
U
l_ _",..d'-.
I
E11STING 8" CL
I
I JUNCTION MANHOLE
I RIM EL.=35.8
INV.=J2.2
VJ f #:1
mITlJIill
~'-'-'-'-'-1
~
r.;'~"l
f I
334.60' N 89051 '21" [
35.J~}
R.L.
*' ALL WORK INSIDE THE TREE BARRICADES, CANOPY DRIP LINES,
AND/OR TREE CANOPY SHALL BE SUPERVISED/IMPLEMENTED BY AN
ISA CERTIFIED ARBORlST.
- -
':<15.40
- -
98 L.F. OF 18"
RCP @ 0.20%
- -
- -
- -
--.-'
')< U.
3~.3J t
';<35 00
= =
3U
36::;
36 J ~~ i) ~
-
-
-
-
. -95', a-::
:'<3Ll ~4
TR1555PRE5ERV A TION TABLE
TREE ELEVATION TO / II
TREE ELEVATION TO /41
TREE BARRICADES *'
TREE AERATION (WANE 3000)
CONCRETE
ROOT PRUNE
/~90T PROTECTION ZONE
CANOPY REDUCTION
PALM TO BE RELOCATED
CRATE INLET
GE=36.0
SLOT=J5.4
IN~ =32.4 /
/
/'
26 LI. OF 15'~ !
RCP @ 0.26% ~
.J 4 .
a:
I
~ I
~~l
~ ~ I
~ a \
~ ~ I
~ ~ I
~ ~ I
~ ~ I
2:~
a~
~
~ ~
~ a I
~~
~ ~ I
~ N I
I
~ ~ I
~ a I
a V) I
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
~T. ~~
C\J 55
~
-
C::; ~
<:\J :'5~2
36.6
35 I
4J
~
36.8
".. o 35j3 I /
_,~.uB ',,' .
3~,.52 X .^. / ><::35) 5
>< 38,7D
35A\.., >( ;':3514
.-"',
...d35
35.8
A .
"-
"
>< "'-"__;t
"j
:05;;0
)< 35 50
~
A
.<0'4"
3tt.? =
R.L.
~
=
AREA INSIDE
BARRICADES
= =
:<3~:<~
)< ::,,60
>i\. 1::"':)
\3J'~c
d.
".i< 34 59
/
..
I"IIIIIIE
~
~
o
II
I
I
I
II
.
I
I
I
D
\
\
"
..4 '1
35.6'
)
136.6 ..
1:;-
36.6
(
~
4'
I !
I
GRATE INLET~
GE=35.0
INV. =32.4
- -"-'-"-. -
II .~:
rL.
~
:S:
"
1!1S
.4 . 0:1 4
"-.
. -:.. .........35..6 +
)
(
]547
~
35.8
35.~:~
;~'
)(35.':10
.:-:,
**' PROTECTION/PRESERVATION NOTES AND DETAILS ARE ON SHEET L 1.2
35.8
EXISTING---.,t
/
\
\VO 'I!g,
1',-'" . ~
c::== =:::J ~ c::::::=:::I c::==::t ~. ~
~
I I
;
.
B
NEW 6" PVC SAN.
SEWER @ 1% MIN.
TO EX. LA TERAL
Bank
1 st Floor
o 3,600 S.F. 0
FFE-37.3
~2
~
= =
= =
'-<J4_94
- - (' :-V -=i'--.)
r-\~ ~y Z@6, 43" I:J'C'---~ ~1
I
I
1___.~37.7.~
. I
\
I
!
I
I
\
+36.15 /
>< 3~ 70 ,:....3-: 70
, ~~ - __- -___~_-____- - n
-{} .:L. _r---~"RE10INING WALL-------SB9;;S i'.2T"'-w---' ,
C)~ / II
10 I / j
, - c I
. r 34 q , j
"''" '"'' x%i ~: I /;,,, //'" ,'6~;;O~/ ",/~-,-=j. ,._1
/?-:- _~__ -~-~ -, '21" -'w--'~"" / // TR':',S3f(~5<MERO' 0' ""P"'; -. - - ..}. I ~>< ) I ] X3762
~1!-1 // --~Yfi,;i:," -,c;~B 89"5 \\, \+-..1.-.-.::: ===':::=: :::::-.= :::::~i'd === :'::::. -- If-- \ ---==-=:------ --==;'<~J<......... .
\ I I / 14 PI;LM ,---',-.- 'L-.i: ." - 37.l2 >~ " ' "
f\ / . GP ATE iNLET -- 37.24 '. "
Gi;;,".TE EL ~ 37,]7
INV EL =" 35.46
;.7,43
~) I
:~II I
~\I
Ct"I'
t-
sl
,
j I
I )
11'/
..ji ;.},J~ >:.:u I:,::::
/'11.
il."i\k II
3551
';<38,02
I
I
I
I
I
.
X37_t.::.
X31.Si'
~
.
I
,/ I
~; m
r-: II
I \~ ·
'" &
'~ :
\ :
\ H
\ :
I .
\ :
3540 \ :
M
I
I
SCALE: 1 "=20'
I S TOP '( viiOOD FFiAi,dE
COM/v1EPC/AL B(iILDI;\JG
i
I
>cn.29
,
i
I
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
20
[:'OND .-;-----:<:"./
--- ----.;<3!J.Bl
," 37 ~,8.~...,
"~,:'--
37,64 :X.
X:-n,J':j
)<3763
PU\NTER
AREI'
X37.53
o
10
20
_-'- ,',SPI1?L T PARI,II'IG
I
1'"
If) I ~
'""- L~
ICO
)1 t5
I-
I
J
I_Vi
.w
..
EB #5936
"
~.~
11I'0,
o
.'1.
n .",
~I
~.==
~III
_III
---z
1'4-
---~
-z
.. III
)(11I
~9
1dJ.'^
C1'- :z:
~I-
co&C
~O
MZ
.. ~
. "II
... _:z:
Z .....'"
... 1"4 1M
- ........
<tilt -..
~ ..
Z .
o ~
" J.
>
Z
....
.
"
Z 1ft
- ~~
Z ~ t\
Z C) M
. Il~"
... a= a
A. "II.
III ==0
.. "'..
Z ......
1.111
. -Ii
.. ~C'"
"II ...
. :2"
() ~
..I ~~
.. C)"
~ c~
\I 1IP1 \I
I NES Comm.: 073
I Drawn By: N.E.
I Checked By: H.Gi
II
I Issue Date: 03/25~)8 I
Revisions:
No. Date
.& 06/05/08 PER DRe
6. II
6. /1
6. / /
6. /1
I /
6. / /
~
j
@b
~
[?
C=:J
(!(if)
(!(if)
~
C=:J
[?
C=:J
d
C=:J
P
2)
~
~
@3
~
~
C=:J
~
@
~
LLI
I-
Z
UJ
(.)
....I
c:t
z
e
-
U)
U)
UJ
Ll-
e
~
a-
U)
~
c::c
e
~
e
CCI
~
c:t
:c
40
!::hI
@3
~
C=:J
@
~
@3
FINIShED fLOOP
>-<37 I.!.:J
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERlY OF THE
ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT
THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. (QCOPYRIGHT 2008 NOT PUBLISHED
X 37 29
'/J4 '7~j
<~n 77 !
/
?\.~~PH_t._L T F'l\R!'\I I--lG'--"/'-
{LEVA
=: 5/3', ~2,J
i
~x. FHA
)1',_ ~; -;' ]."
GP/.J, iE i ~,iLE'1
RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P.E. #47431
COPIES OF THESE PlANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS
EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAl
(~R;\F- F::-; ,1)7 !
Descri ticl
ii
II
M
M
V
f"W')
I
a.n
a.n
,......
f"W')
f"W')
z<c
00
!!!~
~O
a~ ...J
<(LL
:1: ol
1-. w
a~ ~
Cl ........
u. ~
vi ~
O~
C) d
@~D]
~~d(E2~"X2-1/2'X1/2"
4.x3/B"~
ANCHOR STUD
GRATE FRAME W/STUO. STEEL
FRAME W/2 ANCHOR STUDS
PER SIDE - EQUAL CENTERS.
GALVANIZE AmR FABRICATION
ANCHOR
STANDARD DETAL
CAST IRON RETICULlNE
GRATE, TRAFFIC TYPE
(HS-20 LOADING) W/2 SIDED
GRATE SEAT
a" CONC. WALL
4000 PSI @
26 DAYS
#4 ; @12" O.C.E.W.
.
OCI
NOTE:
,. CUT PI PE FLUSH
w/INSDE FACE OF
WALL.
2. MORTAR BOTTOM TO
MATCH INVERT OF
OUTFALL PIPE.
INLET DETAIL
N.T.S,
TOP ELEV. 34.5
42"
3: 1 SIDE SLOPE
BOTTOM
ELEV. 31.0
NOTE:
SAND BASED SOD
SIDES & BOTTOM
jlE?::lil~jH~
RETENTION BASIN DETAIL
N.T.S.
ASPHALT @ 1/4"
PER FT. MIN.
EXCEPT AS NOTED
~
F.D.O.T. CERTIFIED
COMPACTED TO
98% MAX. DENSI1Y
MSHTO T-180
SUBBASE
STABILIZED
40 L.B.R.
COMPACTED TO
98% MAX. DENSI1Y
MSHTO T-180
IN R.O.W. + DRIVEWAY SECTION
N.T.S.
NEW SURFACE
(SEE NOTES 1 & 2)
EXIST. SURFACE
VARIES I
REPAIR OF PAVEMENT NOTES:
1. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL BE MECHANICALLY
SAWED AND ALL SURFACES TACK COATED
2. SURFACE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING SURFACE AND
THICKNESS; WITH MIN OF 1 1/2" ASP
CURRENT FDOT STANDARDS. - HALT F.D.O.T. MEETING
3. TTB~S1~8~A1ffl~~xT~Ckf J[N~~Cf~ bNET~~M12~bA~~ERA~t6RS
- 80, LAB REPORTS ARE REQUIRED
4. ~~~~kLLTt01RoJ~E~~H M~~L~M B bE~~*,E~~ N DU~R~~~~A~~ED
AASHTO T -99, LAB REPORTS ARE REQUIRED.
REPAIR OF PAVEMENT CUTS
N.T.S.
HANDICAP PARKING STRIPING DETAIL
N.T.S.
18"
NOTE:
ALUMINUM BARS @ 6" O.C.
TOP VIEW
#4 BAR
SIDE VIEW
MITERED END SECTION DETAIL
N.T.S.
P/L
SEE PLAN
PLACE SOD 1/2"
BELOW PAVEMENT
FIN. GRADE PRIOR
TO SODDING
POSITIVE DRAINAGE
MEET EX.
( 4: 1 MAX)
. "." I//!'\\ '{//\\
'W,'Wi/t-"_'!!I:"'" -~
COMPACTED GROUND
P/L
SEE PLAN
PLACE SOD 1/2"
BELOW PAVEMENT
FIN. GRADE PRIOR
TO SODDING
POSITIVE DRAINAGE (4: 1 MAX)
MEET EX.
COMPACTED GROUND
GROUND TRANSITION
AT THE PROPERTY LINE
N.T.S.
MEDIUM BROOM
FINISH CONC. WALK
r FINISH GRADE TO
1" BELOW
2' LEVEL EDGE OF WALK
I.SHOULDER'I . VARIES (SEE PLAN) S~O~WiR
SOD :LO~E 1/4" PER FOOT i', SOD .j
III[-,III! J, . ..... 14"," .'[ -111--,11
--lill=IIII~= illi==IIW'-' ,=
~ COMPACTED FILL OR
UNDISTURBED SOIL
NOTE:
PROVIDE 1/4"
CONTROL JOINTS
@ 4'O.C., 5' O.C.,
8' O.C., OR 12' O.C.
& 1/2" BITUMINOUS
EXPANSION JOINTS
@ 40' O.C. FOR 4'
SIDEW~LKS, 50' O.C.
FOR 5 OR GREATER.
CONCRETE WALK DETAIL
N.T.S.
WHEN SIDEWALK IS
TO BE REMOVED &/OR
NEW SIDEWALK IS TO
BE ADDED, IT IS TO
BE REMOVED TO THE
NEAREST EXPANSION
JOINT,
EACH PARKING
SPACE SHALL BE
CONSPICUOUSLY
STRIPED IN BLUE
AND WHITE PAINT
AND SHALL BE POSTED
AND MAINTAINED WITH A
PERMANENT, ABOVE-
GRADE SIGN BEARING
THE INTERNATIONAL
SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILLlTY
AND THE CAPTION
"PARKING BY DISABLED
PERMIT ONLY".
SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT
BE OBSCURED BY A
VEHICLE PARKED IN THE
SPACE. ALL HANDICAPPED
PARKING SPACES MUST
BE SIGNED & MARKED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE STANDARDS
ADOPTED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
AND A.D.A.
SYMBOL SHALL BE 5 FT.
HIGH & WHITE PAINT COLOR
HANDICAPPED PAVEMENT SYMBOL
N.T.S.
/
BASE
COMPACTED
SUBBASE
NOTE:
LOCATE WHEEL STOP
2-1/2' FROM EDGE
OF PAVEMENT TO
CENTER OF WHEEL STOP.
WHEEL STOP DEl AIL
N.T.S.
GROUT TOP OF HOLE
6' LONG PRECAST
CONCRETE WHEEL
STOP W/HOLE TO
ACCEPT #6 ~ FOR
A SNUG FIT 8"
FROM EACH END
2-#5 ~ DRIVEN
THROUGH WHEEL
STOP TO COMPACTED
SUBBASE
PAVING
EXIST. SURFACE
SAW-CUT EXIST.
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
& BASE
NEW SURFACE
EXIST. BASE
NEW BASE
NEW SUBBASE
PAVEMENT TRANSITION DETAIL
N.T.S.
ASPHALT @ 1/4"
PER FT. MIN.
EXCEPT AS NOTED
L1MEROCK BASE
F.D.O.T. CERTIFIED
COMPACTED TO
98% MAX. DENSI1Y
MSHTO T-180
SUBBASE
COMPACTED TO
98% MAX. DENSI1Y
MSHTO T-180
ON SITE PARKING
+ DRIVEWAY SECTION
N.T.S.
NEW BLDG.
ROOF DRAIN
FIN. GROUND
i UTILITY (i.e. SANITARY
SEWER, WATER SERVICE
FIRE LINE OR STORM '
DRAIN) BY SITE CONTRACTOR
TO 5' FROM BLDG.
"~-:""'~~~' ,.~-;S\1
~'\.~,~,--:"-'~
UTILITY WITHIN 5' OF BLDG.
BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR.
FINAL CONNECTION BY PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE
COORDINATED BY THE G.C.
UTILITY CONNECTION
AT ALL BUILDINGS
N.T.S.
12"
BLUE
BACKGROUND
~
SIGN SPEClFlCA l10NS
1. 18"x12" LOGO SIGN
2. 2 SIGN COMBINATION
REFLECTIVE SHEETING
3. LETTERS TO BE
1" HIGH SERIES "c"
4. SIGN TO BE MADE OF
ALUMINUM
5. POST TO BE MADE OF
GALVANIZED STEEL
(SEE DETAIL)
6. SIGNAGE PER A.DA
REQUIREMENTS
1-1/2"R
1/2" WIDE
WHITE BORDER
AND SYMBOL
"IX)
WHITE
BACKGROUND
PARKt-JG BY
DISABLED
PERMIT
ONLY
1" SERIES "c"
LETTERS
1/2" BLACK
BORDER
1.5"
1"
I"
I"
1.5"
WHITE ,
BACKGROUND lD
HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL
N.T.s.
NEW BLDG.
5" H 2"
I I
I I
I I
1'1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I . I
I I
t:7
-4
12"
N
16"
L_____
4"
10"
J~
GREASE BAFFLE TO BE
1/4" THICK ALUMINUM
w/STAINLESS STEEL ANCHORS
SLOT + GREASE
BAFFLE DETAIL
N.T.S.
FILL GROUND AROUND
BLDG. TO 3" BELOW
FIN. FLOOR ELEVATION
& SOD
MAX. SLOPE 4: 1
MIN. SLOPE 2%
GROUND PREPARATION
AT ALL BUILDINGS
N.T.S.
1'11'/--
I I--
COMPACTED FILL III! =.:-= UJl .
OR UNDISTURBED
SOIL
3' -1"
,
J
NON TRAFFIC GRATE
ELEV.: 34.0
8" MASONRY OR
APPROVED R.C.
PREFAB
GREASE SKIMMER
(SEE DETAIL)
BOTTOM OF SLOT
ELEV.: 33.0
15" RCP
INV. ELEV.: 30.0
I_tii
".
~
)------
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
6" UNDERDRAIN
INV. ELEV.: 30.0
CONTROL STRUCTURE
N.T.S.
.bJ
..
PLACE CONe.
SLAB/WALK
4" BELOW FLOOR
ELEV. EXCEPT AT
DOORS REMAIN FLUSH.
EXPANSION JOINT
SLOPE AT 1/4"
PER FOOT
10: 1 MAX. SLOPE
SOD
TOP ELEV.
.34.5
SAND
SIDES & BOnOM
IIUli=ill=
BonOM
IMPERVIOUS
MEMBRANE
(30 MIL)
FILTER MEDIUM
(SEE SPECS.
SHT C1.2)
6" PVC PERF.
PIPE WL SOCK
INV. ELEV. 30.0
IMPERVIOUS
MEMBRANE
3 SIDES & ENDS
(30 MIL)
EB #5936
NOTES:
1. PROVIDE 5'xS'x4"
THICK CONC. SLAB
@ ALL EMERGENCY EXITS.
2. CONFORM TO ABOVE
DETAIL FOR PLACING
WALKS AT THE BLDGS.
3" MIN. LAYER
3/4" WASHED GRAVEL
FILTER FABRIC
W/PERMEABILlTY COEF.
OF 0.20 CM/SEC
...
nt
· .0
It
O'-!
~
~ '.. 7
. ~ =
q~
, III
. ~III
h7
., =
I. ~
· ~Z
-III
')11I
4;A
"10-
I.'"
:z:
t '. ...
q~
o
.110
nZ
. ~
...
.. . 'i
I-
Z
WI
t
z
o
~
-
>
Z
WI
. .:z:
I . \I
.111I
I. ...
... ;,.
..
...
-
~
t
I
III
.
"
Z 11\
- ~ .
Z -4 .....
M
Z C M
.. jC ~
... II a
A. 111I ~
~ 0
A , ...
Z UI ...
111I
.. ill ...
~
... :~ III
I~ I-
,. ~
. ,.
C ~
III 'liI ~
> ( ~
- ( :I
\J l~ \I
I NES Comm.: 073
I Drawn By: N.E.A
I -
Checked By: H.G.
NOTE:
~~IT~~~sfg~E,R~f~E~OOtK F6~E~T~EE~I~Ai~~~~ ~~R~g~rfISED
AGGREGATE. (SEE SPECIFICATIONS SHEET C1.2) E
PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE
SLAB AT ALL BUILDINGS
N.T.S.
PLACEMENT OF
SOD AT PAVEMENT
N.T.S.
FINISH GRADE TO
1" BELOW
EDGE OF WALK
MEDIUM BROOM
FINISH CONe. WALK
EXPANSION JOINT
1-1/2" RADIUS
VERTICAL CURB
PAVING
BASE
COMPACTED
SUBBASE
3,000 PSI NOTE:
CONCRETE PROVIDE 1/4"
CONTROL JOINTS
@ 4'O.C., 5' O.C
8' O.C., OR 12' 'G.C.
& 1/2" BITUMINOUS
EXPANSION JOINTS
@ 40' O.C. FOR 4'
SIDEWALKS, 50' 0 C
FOR 5' OR GREATER
CURB/WALK DETAIL .
N.T.S.
GALVANIZED METAL
SIGN POST WITH 3/8"
HOLES DRILLED
ON 1" CENTERS
i---
FINISHED
GROUND
3000 PSI CONC.
:
v
N
SIGN POST DETAIL
N.T.S.
GRADE
'io ~ ~~~~~~~'e"~~~~~~~~~
'" ::2' WATER MAIN OR I
STORM DRAIN D.I.P. IS USED IN PLACE OF P V C
FOR A MIN. OF 10' EACH WAY' . .
+ FROM (i OF WATER MAIN WHEN
~ THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN
"I WATER & SEWER MAINS IS 18" OR LESS.
18 OR MORE VERTICAL CL. I
~W}#m~;;;Y#~
NOTE: P.V.C. OR V.C.P.
CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF SAN. SEWER GRAVITY MAIN
SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY
MAIN IS NOT PERMITTED.
GRADE
~~~ ~~~
~~
V WATER MAIN n::2'
~.... 10' MIN.
HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
~
STORM SEWER
OR SAN. SEWER
GRAVI1Y MAIN
HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
I Issue Date: 03/25~ ~
Revisions:
No. Date Descripti In
& 06 05 08 PER DRC
D,
D,
D,
D,
D,
D,
D, / /
D::
w
I-
Z
w
U
.....
CURB (!Iii) <C
d z "I
0 "I
c:::J ~
~ - OW')
(I) I
'- FLUSH CURB (I) .t')
p .n
W .....
[!!!!] LI- V')
OW')
FLUSH CURB @ 0 Z<C
RAMP DETAIL ~ 0:)
D. V)-
CURB N.T.S. [!!!!] -~
(I) ~:>
p ~ ~..J
<(.L
c:::J <C I ..
rJ!/i) 0 .~
J-.u
~ ~
d O(
0 u.>
c:::J CD >
~ .x:
D:: V)(
c:::J <C 0 .u
@ 0 ..J
:I: J
ii
UNDERDRAIN DETAIL
N.T.S.
PLACE SOD 1/2"
BHOW PAVEMENT
FIIN. GRADE PRIOR
TO SODDING
......---- POSITIVE DRAINAGE
TRUNCATED DOMES
PER FOOT INDEX 304
MADE AT INITIAL CONC
POURING .
CURB
CURB
HANDICAP RAMP DETAIL
N.T.S.
18" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
I
------@=----SAN SEWER
VERTICAL CLEARANCE
WATER MAIN + SANITARY
SEWER CLEARANCES
N.T.S.
~..~
~
~
-
II
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF
ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPR SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE
THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER ODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT
. (1;)COPYRIGHT 2008 NOT PUBLISHED
@~Dlu
RAM A. GOEl, Ph.D., P.E. #47431
COPIES OF THESE .PLANS ARE NOT VALID UN
EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S s't.lS
__~_.,."__","".."",.,~..,""'l\'M"","~ijO.];5ili'.d'\1r"!-'f.1i;;;~'",~,,'.c,'i.t..""""',....,,'"'...~.-_.-..~_._~---.--~_.._"
o 0
Top
View
Ford Meter
Approved Backf'low *
Prevention DeviC<Eflanged)
Forol Angle
Valve(Flo.ngeol)
Flow
..
Brass Nipple
Meter
(Flo.ngeol)
~ OJ
-- ()
0__
~V)
!..
OJ
~
o OJ
.pCJ
1fIi/i
:::>
u
12"
~
TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE[ 1/2" end 2/1 MODELS
NOTE:
Device Must be instullecl level.
* APPROVED R.P. DEVICES
Hersey-Beeco Moclel FRP II
'Wo. Hs Model 909 or 009
Conbro.co 40200
* APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES
Hersey- Beeco Moclel FDC
'Wo.Hs Model 709 or 007
Conbro.co 40100
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
REDij,t.J BY TYPICAL METER SETS 'W
CHECKED BY BACKFLO'W PREVENTERS
DESIGNED BY 1 1/2' o.ncl 2' MODELS
DATE
DESCRIPTION
REV.
N'P.
STANDARD CAST IRON MANHOLE
FRAME AND COVER, SEE NOTE 8
5/S"R
GRADE ELEVATION
2 TO 4 COURSES
OF CLAY BRICK
PLASTERED WITH 1 /2"
PORTLAND CEMENT
~ ~
,
:::cO
1-1
0...
'-'-'0
0-
'"
I
~
9 ~ 0 ~
N (f) I I
5 ,=>1-
o ~ 0::
wO}:!
G:i I- L5
0:: Cl.. ~
o ::> <.:l
5 L.Jw
o ~ ~
lIi
c:; :Z:Z
~ ~ ~
0.. 'Q, N
COAL TAR EPOXY
IN AND OUT, SEE NOTE 4
IlYPE I 22-3/4'1
1Yl'E II 34-1/6'
~
SURFACES
COVER DETAIL
~
lYPE I 36'
lYPE II 40-1/2'
PIPE BEDDING TO
" -0" ABOVE TOP
OF LATERAL SEWER
RING DETAIL
COVER AND RING NOTES:
1. TYPE I RING USED WHEN DIAMETER OF
LARGEST PIPE IN STRUCTURE IS 24"
OR LESS. RING AND COVER TO BE U.S.
FOUNDRY CAT. #485-G OR EQUAL.
2, TYPE II RING USED WHEN DIAMETER OF
LARGEST PIPE IN STRUCTURE IS 27"
OR MORE. RING AND COVER TO BE U.S.
FOUNDRY CAT. #655-U OR EQUAL.
3. MANHOLE RING SURFACES IN CONTACT
WITH COVER SHALL BE MACHINED
SMOOTH.
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE
BASE W/#S @ 9" O.C.B.W.
6" COARSE AGGREGATE
F,O.O.T. #56
FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT IN
MANHOLE SLEEVE
"A" 24" DIA. FOR INLET
PIPES 8" TO 27" DIA.
32" DIA. FOR INLET
PIPES 3D" AND LARGER.
SEE NOTE 8.
"B" VARIES, SEE NOTE 7.
"c" 8" OR 12", SEE NOTE 7.
0"
"", ',. -- PREFORMED RAM-NEK
...... .. ... JOINT SEALING COMPOUND
, (OR APPROVED EQUAL).
MANHOLE BARREL
JOINT DETAIL
(SEE NOTE 2)
APPROXIMATE WEIGHTS-LBS.
TYPE I TYPE II
RING 240 230
COVER 130 260
TOTAL 370 490
NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS:
1. ALL PIPE STUBS FROM MANHOLES FOR FUTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PRO-
VIDED WITH WATERTIGHT PLUGS PLACED WITHIN THE MANHOLE.
2. MANHOLE SHALL CONSIST OF A MINIMUM NUMBER OF PRECAST SECTIONS, AS
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
3. SHALLOW TYPE MANHOLES WITH DEPTHS BETWEEN 4'-0" AND 5'-0" MAY BE
CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK WITH A 4'-0" INSIDE DIAMETER AND CONE, OR A FLAT
SLAB TOP. MANHOLES WITH DEPTHS LESS THAN 4'-0" WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
4. A COAL TAR EPOXY PROTECTIVE COATING, EQUAL TO KOPPERS 300 M, SHALL BE
APPLIED TO THE FILLETS AND WALLS OF PRECAST CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER
MANHOLES. 2 COATS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE INSIDE TO YIELD A FINAL DRY
THICKNESS OF 9 MILS, AND 1 COAT SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE OUTSIDE.
5. MANHOLES SHALL CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM SPECIFICATION
C-478, EXCEPT AS NOTED.
6. A DROP MANHOLE SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE INVERT OF ANY INCOMING
PIPE IS MORE THAN 2 FEET ABOVE THE INVERT OF THE MANHOLE.
7. A) 8" TO 24" DIA. PIPE: 4'-0" MIN. INSIDE DIA. MANHOLE, 8" THICK.
CB) 27" TO 36" DIA. PIPE: 5'-0" MIN. INSIDE DIA. MANHOLE, 12" THICK.
) 42" TO 48" DIA. PIPE: 6'-0" MIN. INSIDE DIA. MANHOLE, 12" THICK.
8. A) 8" TO 24" DIA. PIPE: RING SHALL HAVE A 20-3/4" OPENING,
EQUAL TO U.S. FOUNDRY CAT. 485-G.
B) 3D" AND LARGER DIA. PIPE: RING SHALL HAVE A 32" OPENING,
EQUAL TO U.S. FOUNDRY CAT. 655-U.
9. MANHOLE COVER SHALL BE CENTERED IN MANHOLE.
PRECAST SANITARY MANHOLE DETAIL
N.T.S.
Hose
TEMPORARY BLO~OFF
AND SAMPLE TAP
Restro.ined ~
To.pped Plug
END CONNECTION
NOTES:
1.) WALLS
a.) New construction: maximum 6'-0' high and constructed of
concrete block (a"xa"x16"). Moterials used should be consistent
with those used in the canslruction of and architectural style of
the principal building. (Section 3-802 Materials)
DATE
02/94
INDEX NO.
405
2 OF 5
b.) Existing: maximum 6'-0' high replacement materials con be
mode of the some mater'ials os long os they ore mode of
approved opaque material.
2.) FOOTINGS
8"x16" concrete w/2- #5 continuous rebar imbedded.
3.) CONCRETE SLAB
Monolithic, min. 6" thickness w/imbedded 6"x6"/ 10xl0 welded
wire fabric (W.W.F.). 3000 P.S.!. with fiber mesh reinforcing.
4.) CONCRETE FILLED CELLS
With 1- #5 vertical rebar tied to footer steel at each corner and
every 4' O.C.
5.) GATES
Constructed of min. 1-1/2" diameter galvanized tubular steel
w/privacy-type slots inserted in galvanized steel mesh fabric,
hinge-mounted on min. 3" diameter galvanized steel post.
(Gates and post constructed and installed per applicable building
code by licensed fence contractor).
6.) DROP PIN
1/2" dia. 18" long metal rod gate latch. Provide 3/4" dia. hole
6" into concrete for rods. In asphalt provide a 3/4" P.V.C.
sleeve, 6" long. or equal.
7.) SOIL
Soil bearing capacity to be at least 2,500 P.S.F.
3/4'
2' Go.l vo.nize
2' Corporo. ti~
To.pping Saclolle
TOP CONNECTION
CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
TEMP BLO\.lOFF
AND
SAMPLE TAP
REDRAWN BY
B.V.D.
CHECKED BY
DATE
0&/24/9]
INDEX Na.
408
2 OF 2
REV. DATE
Af'P. DES~~t~H~Y
DESCRPTION
CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CONSlRUCTION
Materials. construction and quontity control of masonry sholl be in accordance
with Uniform Building Code (UBC), Chapter 24. General conditions and
construction requirements shall be applied as specified in UBC, Section 2404 (I),
during grouted masonry work.
1. All reinforcing steel sholl be deformed bars conforming to ASTM A-G1S,
Grode 60. Vertical rein farcement shall be placed in the center af the
masonry cell, and sholl be held in pOSition at the top and bottom.
2. If 0 slob dowel daes not line-up with 0 vertical core, it shall not be sloped
more than one horizontal in six verticals (1:6).
3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard truss type DUR-O-WALL (or
equivalent) at 16' Q.C..
4. Hollow Load-bearing Concrete Masonry Units shall be normal weight
conforming to ASTM C-90, with a minimum compressive strength of 1.900
PSi.
5. Martar sholl be type M or S, in accordance with ASTM C-270. Place 011
masonry in running bond with 3/6" mortar joints. Provide complete coverage
face shell mortar bedding, horizontal and vertical.
6. Coarse grout shall conform to ASTM C-476, with 0 maximum aggregate size
of 3/8", 8" to 10" slump, ond a minimum compressive strength of 2,500 PSI at
28 days.
7. Minimum 3" X ,3" clean-out holes (sow-cut) ore required at the bottom course
of 011 cells to verify grout placement. Clean-outs sholl be sealed after
masonry inspection-provided in accordance with ACI 531-4.6, and before
grouting.
6. Prior to grouting. the grout space shall be clean, with no mortar projections
greater the ~", mortar droppings or other foreign material. All cells sholl be in
vertical alignment, and sholl solidly be filled with coarse grout os specified.
9. During placing, grout sholl be consolidated with flexible coble vibrator. First
grout pour sholl be stopped 0 minimum of 1 - 1/2" below the top of the
middle bond beam masonry.
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
1 4/9/02
REV. DATE
DRAWN BY
E.A.
CHECKED BY
D.M.
AP? DESI~~~~ BY
DATE
6/01
INDEX NO.
701
3OF3
Rev. Notes
R.G.
OUMPSTER J:"NCLOSURE
NOTES
DESCRIPTION
SETTING
TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT
Hyolrant Asser'1bly
<T yp,)
n.t.s.
ONL Y APPROVED
18' Min.
24' Max.
I~
Dis to.nce V o.ries
.1
Kenneoly Guo.rolio.n No. K-81A
Muller Centurio.n No. A-423
U.S. Pipe Metropolitan
Connecting Piece w/integrO~lY/
Co.st Mech. Joint Glo.ncl on ~
one Encl- D.l. Rota "to.ble Mech.
Joint Glond on Other End.
Box
Box
~
~
.
\D
I
ru
To.pping Sleeve 8. Valve
By City, Fee by
Owner or Contro.ctor
~ Restro.ining Joint <Typ,)
~ Exist. 'WOo ter Main
NOTES:
1. All Fire Hydro.nts to ho.ve 5 1/4# Vo.lve Seo.t.
2. See Inolex ** 407 for Jo.cl-< 8. Bore Deto.ils.
REV. DATE
CITY or CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
TYPICAL HYDRANT 053t~/93
SETTING INDEX Na.
APPING SLEEVE 8. VAL V 402
APP. DESIGNED BY BY CITY 4 OF 4
REDRA'M>J BY
B.V.D.
CHECKEO BY
DESCRIPTION
&
NOTE:
10'-8'
4'
Min.
o
&
CLEANOUT PLUG
CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry COf'1pa~
Po.rt No. 106 Dr Equal \
Concrete
Thiel-< x
See NOTE For Traffic Beo.ring Cover.
&
FEMALE ADAPTER
CHARLOTTE Pipe Anol Foundry COr'1po.ny
Part No. 101 Dr Equal
6' or gu- 1/8 Ben
TERMINAL
Cleanout Plug Cover To Be
U,S. Founclry 7623 Dr Equo.l.
14'-8"
--------------------1
-l6~-d~n~~~~e~--D-- --I
boUo.rcls I
cone. Filled <typ).q-....; ~ ~
u ~I I
c (J)~ I
o Q.... I
U.Q 0 (J) I
c:S (fjQ. I
~ Vl 12' I
cleo.ro.nce Min.
00
PLAN
N.T.S.
~
SECTION
rPlug
Sewer Lo. tero.l
CLEANDUT
DET AIL
N.T.S.
&
CITY OF CLEAR'WA TER, FLORIDA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RED~VN BY STANDARD llJoj~95
CHECKED BY CLEAN OUT [NDEX NO.
"U.S. (So.nito.ry) 304
APP. APP~OC~J. BY
3/1>>4 Revised Per Utilities
R.S.F.
REV.
DATE DESCRIPTION
] OF ]
Tie beo.l"I wi th
2-#5 rebo.r
continuous
12'
cleo.ro.nce Min.
swing gnte
(typ'>
Gro.cle
1-#5 o.t 4'
center
6'
clrop
pin
(typ.>
Gro.cle
3000 p.s.1. concrete slo.lo
with fiber Mesh reinforcing
- Monolithic, Min 6'
thickness, 6'x6' I lOxlO
'W.\.I.F.
swing go.te
(typ.>
8'x 16' concrete
footing
wi 2- #5 rebnr (typ.)
'-
clrop pin
hole (typ.>
ELEVA TION
N.T.S.
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
4/91/D2
REV. DAl TE
DRAWN BY
LA.
CHECKED BY
D.M.
DESIGNED BY
P.H.
DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
SINGLE
DAlE
6/Dl
INDEX NO.
7al
1 OF 3
Rev. Notes
R.O.
APP.
DESCRIPTION
R/'W
I
-I
,
,//. ~ ;,"{/'1:
"-'1' 'X' :...(, ,,/~
30U-36' or o.s
Directed by
the City
CITY O'WNED
AND
MAINT AINED
HOMEOWNER OWNED
AND MAINTAINED
Service Lateral
Mo.in
ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE
WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY
ENGINEER.
3/04
& 7/a3
REV. DATE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
STREET LATERAL
DETAIL
REDRAWN BY
D.Kin
CHECKED BY
DATE
10/17/02
INDEX NO.
305
1 DF 3
Revised Per Utilities
Move C.O. Into RfW
DESCRIPTION
APP. DESr.~~F ~Y
,
J
I_tii
.~
..
EB #5936
"
~t
"0
c'"
c:c .
I~
~I
~~
~III
..... III
~I
Ill~
tz
., III
~III
~e
u'^
0:1:
~tC ~
ClC~
III 0
~z
~
~
..... :I:
1''' \I
III III
~...
4tdI
...
.
...
Z
WI
t
%
o
K
-
>
%
UI
..
~
-
..
t
I
...
.
~
%
-
Z
Z
.
..
A-
D
Z
.
...
11\
~.
~~
C) IW\
I~ ..
1= 8
... ~
== 0
\I..
a~ II.
Il~ .i
=11 III
..: ...
:) ..
~~
=I ==
> C)"
- o~
\I ,.,,'"
.
I NES Comm.: 073
I Drawn By: N,E,A
I Checked By: H.G,
1~
~~
~
II'
Issue Date: 03/25ll
Revisions:
No. Date Descriptic
& 06/05/08 PER DRe
D / /
D / / -
D / / -
D / /
D / / -
D / /
D / /
-
II
..
r&J
d
c::::J
~
~
~
@
~
p
c::::J
(!!Ji)
d
c::::J
~
c::::J
@
D::
LLI
t-
Z
LLI
(.)
....I
<I:
z
o
-
en
en
LLI
LI-
o
D::
a..
en
~
<:t
o
D::
o
m
D::
<:t
::J:
iMeCh. Jolnt Volve
;~
l
II
4....
1-..1
.,.
II")
I
In
In
,"'-
II")
II")
Z ..(
O!~
!:!2 I':::
~I)
~ ,.J
<( II..
Iii
I- IU
a::: 1-
0:.(
u. >
:>
vi I~
- ,.(
OIU
o ,.j
_I)
'!
Ii
THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE
ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT
THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. @COPYRIGHT 2008 NOT PUBLISHED
~~ Lv
~0DL:J
RAM A. GOEl, Ph.D., P.E. #47431
COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS
EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL
. .__. _..m"_...."._...___.._,,_,___,.,,_.'_,'"__~'__'~n_~'~~.~"~,..__~~.........d___""..,."'''').._-'''''''-''''''...-.'''''_~..=_#...!IIO._'''''''''''"'"''''-..of..'''''''_)_~.....,_..~...........d.,''"____'._'_~_"~..""""',.."...,'..""...""~...,...,'''',.'''',.........".,,,.;,~_.'~.""""""""'.....n'..",~,.,."."""."\l,"""""'"-H.,."...,,.~,',,'~"~,~..~,',',.,._____"b'_""'_,",.."".","""_".~.".".."."".,""',','"
PLANT SCHEDULE
TREES
e
6:;,
. .
: .. ,'..
.
a'
. . ":,;;:)
, . d"'~
~~-4vJ1
tB
@
PALM TREES
("
-.:.)
.
iJ)'" '1.
~ "
~.fl>
CODE QTY BOTANICAL
CF
IF
LM
u
QV
TD
UA
4
Cassia fistula
PM2
RE
Sf2
12 Ilex vomltorla 'Fendula'
PLANT SCHEDULE
COMMON
CONT CAL
--
SIZE
DETAIL REMARKS
SHR.UBS
CB
CQ
Q1Y
54
33
BOTANICAL
Conocarpus erectus serlceus
COMMON
Silver Buttonwood
Golden Shower
45 gal 2"Cal
8'ct
Crlnum augustum 'Queen Emma'
'Queen Emma' Crlnum
DB
5b
Dlanella tasmamca . Blushy'
Varlgated flax lily
Weeping Yaupon Holly
30 gal 2"Cal
8'001
HC
219
Hamelia patens 'Compacta'
Dwarf Scarlet Bush
8'001
J/LI.2
LE
MS
539
lIrlope muscarl 'Emera Id Goddess'
Llrlope
8
Lagerstroemla Indica' Muskogee' Multl-Trunked Muskogee Crape Myrtle 30 gal 2"Cal
Myrclanthes fragrans
Simpson's Stopper
I 2 L\gustrum japonlcum
I 0 Quercus vlrglnlana
I 9 T axodlum dlstlchum
3
Ulmus parvlfoha 'Allee'
CODE Q1Y BOTANICAL
--
SP
WR
I 0 fhoemx roebelenl1
3
Rhapls excelsa
I 3 Sabal palmetto
RELOCATED PALM CODE QTY BOTANICAL
<l"'r""'~
Fe"l
\("'l.~"
,a;l'\i'jt~~
\.,
'It,MW.''
Sabal palmetto
9
Washlngtoma robusta
2G2
28
54
153
Japanese Privet
45 gal 2"Cal
8'oa
I/LI.2
NM
Nephrolepls blserrata 'Macho Fern' Macho Fern
Nenum oleander' Petite Pmk'
Petite Pmk Oleander
Southern Live Oak
G5 gal 4"Cal
14'-IG'
Jill .2
NP
ML
Flectranthus - 'Mona Lavander'
Mona Lavander
Bald Cypress
G5 gal 4"Cal
14'-1 G'
I/LI.2
PM
II
Fodocarpus macrophyllus
Yew Fine
Allee Lacebark Elm
RFG
4"Cal
12-15' H
RA
170
Rhaphlolepls Indica 'Alba'
WhIte Indian Hawthorn
SG
IGI
Scheffiera arboncola "Green"
Dwarf Green Arboncola
COMMON
CO NT CAL
SIZE
DETAIL REMARKS
SN
5
25
Strelitzla reglnae
Bird Of Faradlse
Strelitzla nlcolal
Giant Bird of Faradlse
Pigmy Date Palm Multi-Trunk
B*B
3-stem robust 8' oa
SR
VS
75
Viburnum suspensum
Sandankwa Viburnum
Lady Palm
15 gal 5+ stems
5'oa
GR.OUND COVER5 CODE QTY
BOTANICAL
Palmetto
B*B
10'ct+
0'"
'" ..
.. ..
~
445
T rachelospennum aSlatlcum 'Kenrolwen' Dwarf Mlmma Jasmine I gal@ 18" oc
Robust
fA
7.473 sf
faspalum notatum 'Argentine'
COMMON
CO~T
.
B~~
m
B*~
m
II
I
I
m
E
!
Ii
Robust
relocate eXisting palm
CAL
SIZE
DETAIL REMARKS
TK
Palmetto
Robust
relocate eXistIng palm
Mexican Fan Palm
m
II
I
e
I
I
~
SAI,IlT/'.RY MANHOLE .
RI~1 [L = 35.24 m
W. INV EL =~,1.B6
N. IN'!. EL = 318:"lf' .
1 E IN 1/. EL = 3'1i36 Ii
I S. II\!\!. EL = 3U33 II I ML
IE-:I-~~-I:~-[-f;'~ wtl~~;r.~;~~-~ ~---- --.,-emil-
;-..._~. I. vilJ
B~-_m_-i'~~___~Lm1----r~
I
k'W:o.TI,JG a" SAI',Ie-.--
jl'lO,' --'-~"-- {lrN.'
CONT
3 gal
15 gal
I gal
3 '3al
I '3al
3 '3al
3 '3al
3 '3al
3 gal
3 '3al
3 '3al
3 gal
25 '3al
15 gal
3 '3al
COMMON
Bahia Grass
ALLEN (P)
MAGNOLIA DRIVE(F)
1-
li,j
tv:
I:
'-
IL~:
I
I
M
g
I I
-r 0'111 jl- L! TrR ,..
c. 1_, '. ~ -, '- nL ---. --'I..,
I If
i
I I"
! I I !
~ I
'-2- ~ I
~ ~!
:::Ja
~\J).
~~
~~
~~
~~
aN
\J).
~~
~a
~~
~~
~~
~:::J
~o
O\J).
~
I2l STOP
~
"
UAIf2Tl
~I~
CB
~
20
DB
'---
2'
",,R.n
<:It::,d''
I4l
LfQJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
PM2
IG
ML
I2l
~
/
(
(
I
\
~'-------_._.__._-_._-~.
i--------
.
.
I I :
\ ~/ :
~ :
!; II
'i II
II
1 I
I m
\ :
\ :
I M
\ ~
I
II
~
GRATE INLET-
GRATE fL = 37.17
INV EL = 3=', 4-6
i STORr WCIOD rFi'!-\/v/[
C1()/vf/v/E_-f?C'/,I4L BL)/L {)//VL-;
F~/.iV/::;'~/EC) /:-L ()O,t;;
/
~j8 ~/._~)
i\SPH.,),L T P;:,.r(I(lNC---
FLUME'
i]
~
flELD2
24"oa
48"
14"
24"oa
14"
24"oa
18"
24"001
14"
24"oa
14"
18"
8'oa
3G"
24"oa
CONT
sod
----..------ --"- -----------------1
i
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
!
PLANTER
ARE!'_
DETAIL REMARKS
2/L1 .2
2/L1 .2
2/LI.2
2/L1 .2
2/L1 .2
2/L1 .2
2/LI.2
2/LI.2
DETAIL
2!L1 .2
REMARKS
.......,
/
/
//"
!
/_._~.- n'-ivERT::.; ::)~)..;lE
/
F
.___r::.. _--.L___:':~\"
I
I
\
\
\
(
\
\
"
\
\
\
,
\
\
i
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
\
\
\
I
y
z
co:
m
~-
o
@>
_.-.-----.-- .t.,SPH.!:.1 T P':"RKlhlG
Ct~t., TE- :!'~L.f"l
iF.. [I j' : ~
El ~ yj 6:-'
I
U
t--
o
~
;=
8
w
'\
"
\
\
\
i
i
\
\
I
\
\
I
\
\
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
1
~\
n::
(:J I
8'i\
2;
':oC
Z
;;;1
LL\
01
0..1
01
,-
1
I
I
I~
I ;1
c
1f3
It-
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
'\
'2:\
WI
\
i
i
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
1
~ \
tI) ~ '
,( 'I',
r~
~ \-,
~ \
-.J e; I
<( \
\
\
\
\
-J
-
""(
~
I--
-.J
~
<:
-
0-
Bt.ii_L~\ii[;5,
-......""'.....
.......... ,"" T-Qil!
-
- --- - -- _______]n___ -- - -"1' - ----
___________________L__ , I
- "", --- """ -- -- [". ___n 0"" - - - - ,t ---
I-
I28l
~
._,._.,___.J:
-.r)-':-.
TREE TABULATION TABLE
10 PALMS PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED
47 tREES INVENTORIED ON SITE (NOT INCLUDING 9 WASHINGTOIA PALMS) 3/30/05
TREE INVENTORY NUMBER
1 SABAL(#23) & 9 WASHINTONIA
1-6,9-12,14-17,19-22,24,26-28,31,32,34-36,3840,4347
ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS ARE ON SHEET L 1.2
i
\
i
!
i
I
SCALE: 1 "=20'
20
o
10
20
,
J
I_tii
".
.
..,w
..
EB #5936
'"
~~
~S
m\:JI
~i
~III
~III
...Z
I"'l-
..."
-z
.0 III
~IC ...
~a
...11\
oZ
~...
ClC ~
III 0
.. 'I~ Z
. ~
... ..... z:
Z .... '"
fill III
... .......
~ ~-
Z ~
o ~
. J.
>
Z
...
.
'"
Z 1ft
Z O;!
Z ~M
C) ,M
. D:.
~ ei ~
a :I:!o
\.I.-
Z liP"
. Il~ri
.. ::I' YI
...: ...
:>>.
· C)~
.. '" ~
~ o.
~ c.~
\I 1\l\\J
I NES Comm.: 07311
I Drawn By: N.E.J
I Checked By: H.G
I ss ue Date:
Revisions:
No. Date
II
~
~~
~~
II
II
03/25/~ .;~
Descriptiol1
/1\ 06/05/08 PER ORe
6 / /
6 / /
6 / /
6 / /
6 / /
6 / /
ii
40
~
~
d
~
Q!!!]
[?
c:::J
rJ!iJ
Q!!!]
~
~
@
rJ!iJ
@
~
~
d
0:::
LLI
t-
Z
LLI
(.)
....I
c::c
Z
o
-
U)
U)
LLI
LL.
o
0:::
a-
U)
~
c::c
o
0:::
o
m
0:::
c::c
%:
.....
.....
t'
It')
I
n
n
.....
It')
Y')
z(
O~
~~
0::)
0::....
<(L
Ii:
I-lJ
0::::(
0>
lJ..>
.:.:::
V)~
0....
0;
II
BUTLER DESIGN GROUP,
GOLDEN RAIN NURSERY, INC.
4203 46TH AVE. N, ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33714
H 727-521-1684, FAX: 727-527-7422, E-MAIL:RONSPLANS@TAMPABAY.RR.COM
DRAWN BY: RON BELKO
CHECKED BY: CHUCK BUTLER
Certified Arborist : FL-1235A
INC
II
[b~D(]
AERIAL GUY
CABLES TO
CONNECT
TRUNKS:
9 GA CABLE
W / CLEAR
PLASTIC
COATING THRU
5/8" DIA.
RUBBER HOSE
TIE.
---'-"'-~_.'---_.----.-----1----
"CINCH-TIC, "GRO-STRAIT", r
OR EQUAL FLEXIBLE RUBBER W 61
TREE TIES IN FIGURE EIGHT ll:!::J II
FASHION. ATTACH TO STAKE f- <1:
W/ TWO GALV. ROOFING NAILS. x C) I
OLD
m~.
I
1-1-1
<(<(
2" LODGEPOLE PINE TREATED
TREE STAKES. SET STAKES
APPROXIMATELY 120 DEGREES
APART.
f-I-
LL LL
FINISHED GRADE.
OJ"I
221!
f-f-
LLLL
__ _u_________w LD _u~_
ZI
wOI
W-I
~-II
1-<1:!
C)
X
OLD
m~
ROOTBALL
f-1-
<(<(
QJto
"<1-1")
SEE PLANT PIT
DETAIL.
AVOID PLACING STAKES
THRU ROOTBALL.
STAKING DETAIL
PLANTING AT
TURF AREAS.
KEEP TURF CLEAR FOR A 18"
RADIUS CIRCLE AROUND THE
TREE. MULCH WITH A 3" THICK
LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK.
SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1/2" HIGHER
THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED
GRADE. SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM
ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
PLANTING AT
~ SHRUB AREAS.
8"
RECESS TURF AREA
1" TO ALLOW FOR MULCH.
"I")
+
-I LD."<I-.O ill
-I ~ NI") I")
<(
CD I- I- f- f-
f- <1: <( <( <(
o
o
~
TABLETS AS
OR SPEICIFIED.
... .. ... ..
'ONto a
NNN I")
BACKFILL MIX, SEE
NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2X ROOTBALL
32" AT 15 GALLON
48" AT 24" BOX
60" AT 30" BOX
72" AT 36" BOX
NATIVE SOIL MIX
FIRMLY COMPACTED.
PLANT PIT DETAIL
CD
TREE PLANTING MULTI-STAKE
1" = 1 '-0"
32 9343.23-03
WA TER WELL:
4" HIGH AT SHRUB,
NO WATER WELL
A T LAWN AREA.
SET ROOTBALL CROWN
1 " HIGHER
THAN SURROUNDING
FINISHED GRADE.
SLOPE FINISHED GRADE
AT BACKFILL AWAY FROM
ROOTBALL.
GRADE.
u _ _ _111==1 %
., z5' I III III
N 15 S ::JI II III II
+ j ~ <3 -III III
-I <( C) . , '-I I
~l C)LD~
ml
f-I ~f-f-
o! f-<(<(
01<( .
D::i. ~'O
LCX2~.0L _ ____
PLANT TABLETS AS NOTED
OR SPEICIFIED.
BACKFILL MIX, SEE NOTES
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2 X ROOTBALL
NATIVE SOIL MIX
FIRMLY COMPACTED.
12" AT 1 GALLON
22" AT 5 GALLON
32" AT 15 GALLON
o
SHRUB PLANTING
1" = 1'-0"
32 9333.13-01
TILLED AND LOOSENED
NA T]VE SOIL BACKFILL
EXISTING UNDJSTURBED SOIL
CABBAGE PALMS MAY
BE HURRICANE CUT
ALL lITHERS MUST
HAVE FRONDS TIED
\//BIODEGRADABLE
STRAP OR T\/INE
BASE OF LEAF BUD
BASE OF HEART/NUT
OF PALM
TRUNK SHALL BE STRAIGHT AND
VITHOUT CURVES, FREE OF SCARS,
BURNMARKS AND BOllTS
'"
Z
:J
'"
t-
~g
d~
'"
<C
W
-'
U
NlITE.
STAK]NG ~ GUYING REQUIRED FOR
PALM, ]F NECESSARY, OR AS
DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE
ARCHJTECT.
5 LAYERS OF BURLAP,
5 - 2',,4'x]6' WOODEN BATTENS,
CONNECTED VITH 2-3/4' STEEL BANDS.
OR APPROVED ALTERNATE
REMOVE BURLAP AND ALL TIE
MATERJIIL FROM TYHE TOP 1/3 OF
ROllTBALL
2'X4' VOOD BRACE (3 EA. MIN'>
NAIL TO BATTENS S. STAKES
VATER RING (6' VIDTH & H::IGHTl
PROVIDING A VATER COLLECTION
BASIN
(3) 2'x4',,36' \/OODEN STAKES
l..-'
0-'
<C
"'",
1-1-
i:; g RODTBALL
<=I'"
3' MULCH LAYER
FERTlLlZER TABLETS
AS SPECIFIED. PLACE
UNIFORMLY AROU~ND
ROOT MASS BET\/EEN
MIDDLE AND BOTTOM
OF ROOT MASS.
PALM PLANTING
DET AIL
CLEARI,/ATER INDEX No. 904, SH. lof I
Rev. 8/21/06
N.T.S,
.
TREE RELOCATION: PROJECT MANAGER I CONSTRUCTION
SUPERVISOR TO CONSULT AN ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST FOR
TREE RELOCATING AND PRESERVATION MEASURES.
ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED AND RELOCATED MUST BE PROTECTED AND
OR RELOCATED TO A TEMPORARY HOLDINIG AREA PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION,
DEMO, GRUBBING OR GRADING.
1: TREES RELOCATED AND STORED ON SI'TE MUST HAVE AVAILABLE REGULAR
IRRIGATION AND PROTECTED FROMCONSTRUC1l0N INJURY.
OR
2. TREES RELOCATED AND HELD OFF SITE (I,E... ADJOINING PROPERTY, NURSERY, ETC..)
MUST HAVE REGULAR IRRIGATION AVAILABLE AND PROTECTED FROM INJURY.
IF
TREES THAT ARE HELD ON/OFF SITE DIE OR SUFFER FROM LACK OF IRRIGATION
OR SUFFER SERIOUS INJURY - PENALTIES PAID TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
OR REPLACEMENT TREES WILL BE REQUIRED MEETING THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER.
HARD\JODDS
PINES
DRIP LINE
SPECIFICA TIONS - W'ooD BARRIER
I. MINIMUM RADIUS TO BE PROTECTED:
A. HARD'WDDDS - 2/3 DRIPLINE
B. CONIFERS &. SABAL PALMS - ENTIRE DRIPLINE,
2. UPRIGHTS - NO LESS THAN 2' X 2' LUMBER.
DRIP LINE
3. HORIZONTALS - NO LESS THAN I' X 4' LUMBER.
4. BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED
TREES AND PALMS, AND INSPECTED BY CITY
REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS.
5. UPRIGHT POSTS ARE TO BE AT LEAST 4 FEET IN
LENGTH 'WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ANCHORED IN
GROUND AND 3 FEET ABOVE GROUND,
6. BARRIERS TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL PAVING,
CONSTRUCTION AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF
AREA.
FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE LAND
RESOURCE SPECIALIST AT 562-4741.
2/3 OF DRIP LINE
LlNE
r
z
>--<
~
fry
r
z
>--<
~
fry
HORIZoNT AL
UPRIGHT
I
/'
_U
HORIZONTAL
z
>--<
~
z
>--<
~
:...
:...
TREE
BARRICADES
CLEARW'ATER INDEX No. 909, SH. 1
of 1
Rev. 4/09/03
N.T.S.
HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND
LANDSCAPING PERMITS:
IRRIGATION NOTES
1. SHALLOW WELLS, OPEN SURFACE WATER BODIES, OR RECLAIMED
WATER MUST BE USED AS A SOURCE OF IRRIGATION WATER. THE DIST-
RBuToN SYSTEM FOR IRRIGATION MUST NOT BE CONNECTED TO
COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL WATER SOURCES, UNLESS IT CAN BE DEMON-
STRATED THAT THESE SOURCES ARE NOT AVAILABLE.
1. A HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PERMIT IS REQUIRED
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT. APPLICATION SHOULD NOT
BE MADE UNTIL FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANTED.
a. AN APPLICATION AND AN EXTRA COpy OF THE APPROVED FINAL
APPLICATION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THIS DEPARTMENT IN
ORDER TO PROCESS THE PERMIT.
2. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST UTILIZE LOW VOLUME DESIGNS SUCH AS
LOW TRAJECTORY HEADS OR SOAKER HOSES TO PROVIDE DIRECT AP-
PLICATION AND LOW EVAPORATION. SYSTEMS THAT OVERSPRAY AREAS
THAT DO NOT REQUIRE IRRIGATION, SUCH AS PAVED AREAS WILL NOT
BE ACCEPTABLE. HIGH IRRIGATION NEED AREAS MUST NOT OVERSPRAY
LOW NEED AREAS.
b. ALL EXOTIC SPECIES, I.E., BRAZILIAN PEPPER (SCHINUS TEREBIN-
THIFOLlUS). PUNK TREES (MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA), AND CHINESE
TALLOW (SAPIUM SEBIFERUM) MUST BE REMOVED AS A CONDITION OF
SITE DEVELOPMENT. WHERE NECESSARY DUE TO THEIR PROXIMITY TO
PROTECTED PLANT MATERIAL, HAND REMOVAL WILL BE REQUIRED.
SHOULD THIS REMOVAL BE TO A DEGREE THAT A POTENTIAL FOR
EROSION IS CREATED, THE AREA MUST BE RESTABILlZED WITH SUITABLE
MATERIAL.
3. HIGH WATER DEMAND LANDSCAPE AREAS SUCH AS TURF MUST BE
SERVED BY A SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONE THAN LOW WATER NEED
PLANTER BEDS, OR MULCHED AREAS WITH TREES. IN NO CASE, SHALL
ANY PLANTED VEGETATION AREA BE MORE THAN 50' FROM A WATER
SUPPLY HOSE BIBB.
C. ONCE FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL (FAA) HAS BEEN GRANTED, A
BARRICADE INSPECTION CAN BE SCHEDULED. WHEN THE BARRICADES
HAVE BEEN APPROVED THE PERMIT CAN BE TYPED AND RELEASED.
4. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE OPERATED BY AN IRRI-
GATION SYSTEMS OPERATED BY AN IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
CAPABLE OF DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THE SCHEDULES OF HIGH AND
LOW WATER DEMAND AREAS. CONTROLLERS MUST HAVE MULTIPLE
CYCLE START CAPACITY AND A FLEXIBLE CALENDAR PROGRAM ABLE TO
BE SET TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL OR WATER MANAGEMENT DliSTRICT
IMPOSED RESTRICTIONS.
TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION:
TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE REQUIREMENTS:
1. TREE BARRICADES AND/OR SILT SCREENS OR HAYBALES SHALL BE
REQUIRED ALONG THE EDGES OF VEGETATED AREAS TO BE PROTECTED
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPE
PERMITS. THE LOCATION FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN
ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
5. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH RAIN
SENSOR DEVICE OR SWITCH WHICH WILL OVERRIDE THE IRRIGATION
CYCLE OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHEN ADEQUATE RAINFALL HAS
2. ALL DESIRABLE TREES MUST BE RETAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE.
IT WILL BE REQUIRED THAT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (i.e. BUILDINGS,
WALKWAYS, DRIVEWAYS, POND BANKS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, ETC.) BE
ADJUSTED TO RETAIN DESIRABLE TREES. GRADE CHANGES MUST BE
SENSITIVE TO TREES REMAINING. IN GENERAL, NO GRADE CHANGES
SHOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF PINE TREES AND
2/3 THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF HARDWOOD TREES TO BE SAVED.
THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN UNDERGROUND IRRI-
GATION SYSTEM TO COVER 100% OF ALL ON SITE PLANTING AREA.
THIS SYSTEM SHALL CONTAIN BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
1. UNDERGROUND PIPING, SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR BETTER.
2. SEVEN (7) DAY PROGRAMMABLE TIME CLOCK TO ACTIVATE ZONES.
3. SPRINKLER HEADS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TYPE OF PLANTING.
4. ELECTRIC VALVES.
5. GAUGE 14 UF COPPER WIRE.
6. FIBERGLASS OR PLASTIC ZONE VALVE BOXES.
LANDSCAPING
1. EACH LANDSCAPING AND REPLANT TREE MUST BE PLANTED WITHIN
A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT BY TEN (10) FOOT OPEN SPACE PLANTER
WITH SUITABLE GROUND COVER. LANDSCAPE TREES MUST BE PLANTED
IN SAME VICINITY AS VEHICULAR USE AREAS IN ORDER TO BREAK THE
MONOTONY OF UNBROKEN EXPANSES OF PAVING. TREES MUST NOT
BE PLANTED WITHIN MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS.
WHERE PIPING IS UNDER DRIVEWAY AND CONCRETE WALKS, THE PIPES
SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES 18" BELOW GRADE.
MATERIALS SUPPLIED SHALL BE EQUAL TO THOSE MANUFACTURED BY
RAIN BIRD CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL.
2. THE USE OF XERISCAPE DESIGN MUST BE UTILIZED FOR THE
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE DESIGN. THE DESIGN DEMONSTRATES THE USE
OF A LOW VOLUME IRRIGATION SYSTEM, ORGANIC MULCHES, DROUGHT
AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL, ZONING OF PLANT MATERIAL
BY WATER REQUIREMENTS, SOIL AMENDMENTS (IF NECESSARY) AND THE
PRACTICAL USE OF TURF.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SYSTEM LAY-OUT ALONG WITH
CATALOG SHEETS OF ALL COMPONENTS IN THE SYSTEM TO THE
OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
3. NEW LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR MOVE-
MENT BY WHEEL STOPS OR CURBING
WHERE POSSIBLE, THE AREA BETWEEN THE BARRIER AND LANDSCAPE
MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN AS GREENSPACE.
THE ENTIRE SYSTEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR
ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE ARCHITECT/
ENGINEER.
4. LARGE TREE SPECIES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST BE A
MINIMUM OF 20 FEET AWAY FROM BUILDINGS, SIGNS, FENCES, LIGHT
POLES, UTILITY LINES AND ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT MAY
IMPAIR NATURAL GROWTH.
ANY AND ALL USE OF HOSE BIBBS IN ASSOCIATION WITH
NON-POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES SHALL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE
WITH SBCCI STANDARD PLUMBING CODE, CHAPTER VI CRITERIA
REFERENCE COLOR CODING OF ABOVE GRADE RISER PIPING
AND LABEL/TAGGING OF OUTLETS AS NON-POTABLE WATER SUPPLY.
5. TREES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST NOT BE IN CONFLICT
WITH PROPOSED OR EXISTING UTILITY LINES OR STRUCTURES, EASE-
MENTS OR OTHER AREAS WHICH MAY REQUIRE EXCAVATION IN THE
EVENT OF SYSTEM FAILURE. THESE FEATURES SUCH AS THE WATER
LINES MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE THE 5' X 10' PLANTER AREA.
ANY BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED IS SUBJECT TO NOTIFICATION
TO THE AIR TOXICS SECTION OF THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OF
BUILDINGS.
6. SOILS WITHIN PLANTER BEDS MUST BE SUITABLE FOR PROPOSED
PLANTED MATERIAL WITH REGARDS TO pH, SOIL TEXTURE, SOIL
STRUCTURE, AND SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE.
7. ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MUST BE FLORIDA GRADE # 1 OR BETTER.
8. ALL REQUIRED TREES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10' HIGH, 2-1/2"
CALIPER AT TIME OF PLANTING.
9. ALL HEDGES MUST BE 24" HIGH AT THE TIME OF PLANTING,
PLANTED AT 30" ON CENTER, AND BE MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM OF
3' IN HEIGHT.
1 O. WHERE LANDSCAPE OR REPLANT TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE
PLANTED IN THE PERIMETER BUFFER, THE BUFFER MUST BE A MINIMUM
OF 5' WIDE.
..
J
... tii
.'
.~
..
UPRIGHT
XERISCAPING
1. ORGANIC MULCHES AND/OR DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUNDCOVERS
WITHIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTER BEDS.
,
.
'l~
110
C . \I
C) .
"
:11
'lI." a=
III
41i~ III
If,Z
11-
If, "
"'Z
, III
, "11I
'4 fa
It. ,'"
:z:
c....
'" a=
c "0
Il
.. I.Z
.. 'lI
..
.. .., :z:
Z I, \I
I jlll
III I ,...
~ .-.)
..
..
Z -
..
0 ~
~ I
- III
>
Z
III
.
"
Z 1ft
- ~ 10
Z ....
.,. 1ft
Z C 1ft
.. IC ..
.. iIC a
A. 111I ~
A :~ 0
" ..
z "' Yo
111I
.. iD ..
a=
.. :~ III
I~ ...
,. ..
. ,. ~
C
'1Il ~
..
III
..
\I
INES Comm.: 073
I Drawn By: N.E.
jChecked By: H.C
0, ate escrlptlo
D I /
D I I
D I I
D I I
D I I
D -
I I
D -
I I
2. DROUGHT AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL.
3. GROUPING OR ZONING PLANT MATERIAL BASE ON SIMILAR WATER
REQUIREMENTS AND THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION
WATERING SYSTEMS.
4. THE USE OF SOIL TESTING TO IDENTIFY SOIL CONDITIONS NECES-
SARY FOR THE CONTINUED SURVIVAL OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
ssue Date:
Revisions:
N D
5. ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENTS (SUCH AS TOP SOILS, MANURE'S, PEAT
AND COMPOSTED MATERIALS) MIXED EXISTING SOILS WITHIN LANDS-
CAPING PLANTER BEDS TO DEPTHS CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEPTH
OF PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL (USE ONLY IF EXISTING SOIL
CONDITIONS WARRANT THESE AMENDMENTS).
6. THE PRESERVATION AND INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANT
COMMUNITIES ON SITE INTO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
7. THE MINIMAL USE OF TURF GRASSES WHICH REQUIRE FREQUENT
IRRIGATION.
8. LOW-MAINTENANCE DESIGN.
TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAILS
1. THE ROOT MASS FORM OF EACH TREE PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION
SHALL BE BALLED OR BURLAPPED. BARE ROOT TREES ARE NOT AC-
CEPTABLE. ALL NON BIODEGRADABLE WRAPPINGS WILL BE REMOVED
AND BURLAP WILL BE FOLDED DOWN TO ENHANCE WATER ABSORPTION.
IF WIRE BASKETS ARE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BALLED AND
BURLAPPED TREES. THE FIRST FEW ROWS OF EACH BASKET WILL BE
REMOVED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION.
2. SUPPORTING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE
GROWING SEASON. ALSO THE FLEXIBLE ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE USED
WHERE SUPPORT WIRES ARE WRAPPED AROUND TREE TRUNKS/STEMS
TO PREVENT CAMBIAL DAMAGE.
3. PLANTING HOLES ASSOCIATED WITH PROPOSED TREES MUST SLOPE
(NOT COMPACTED) AND A MINIMUM OF 18-24 INCHES WIDER THAN
THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH
THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOT MASS IS LEVEL WITH THE SURFACE OF
THE PLANTING HOLE. TREES SHOULD BE INSTALLED 3 - 5 INCHES
ABOVE GRADE ON SITES CONTAINING CLAY. A 2 - 3 INCH LAYER OF
ORGANIC MULCH MUST ALSO BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE
OF EACH PLANTING HOLE. TO PREVENT FUNGAL INFECTION MULCH
SHOULD BE PULLED BACK A FEW INCHES FROM THE BASE OF EACH
TREE.
4. IF ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUCH THAT SOIL AMENDMENTS
WILL BE NECESSARY, THE PLANTING MUST INCLUDE SOIL MIXTURE
THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SECTION OF EACH PLANTER AREA TO A
DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED
PLANT MATERIAL.
5. PLANTERS ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREAS MUST
BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH THAT L1MEROCK, ASPHALT, CONCRETE OR ANY
OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS DO NOT EXTEND UNDER THE SURFACE INTO
THE PLANTING AREAS.
6. THE PRACTICE OF TREE TRUNK WRAPPING AND THE APPLICATION OF
PAINTS/TAR ONTO PRUNED TREE BRANCHES IS NOT RECOMMENDED
BY THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURAL.
.
~
j~
~~
.'
.'
03/25/0~ ..~
D
BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, INC
GOLDEN RAIN NURSERY, INC,
4203 46TH AVE. N. ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33714
H 727-521-1684, FAX: 727-527-7422, E-MAIL:RONSPLANSOTAMPABAY.RR.COM
DRAWN BY: RON BELKO
ISA Certified Arborist : FL-5802A
CHECKED BY: CHUCK BUTLER
ISA Certified Arborist : FL-1235A
n (l LV
l:J U 0 L::J
m
I
.
.
m
B
M
W
m
I
I
B
B
I
.
I
B
I
R
.
B
I
g
I
"i'.!\liTARY Mp.NHOLE I
Rltvl EL ~ 3524
W. INiI, EL ~ YI.BG B
1'1. II,\;, EL "' Sl.E,:S/11( . STORM Mi'.I'IHOLE (22' ASPH!-\L T)
I E INV EL ~ .31,515 H i .RIM El. ~ 34,'/10 _.~
Is 11\11' EL :~~8jll!,._,_ _~~__, __ ---oiiiiii~"....- __...... -o!iiii",-iiiio--__-_-_-,--iiiIiiL'-....---iiiiiii""..... __....-__....--._---.- '_...--iiiiiil---....-iiiiiii--..._- ------- -- f-------(Q~E iI'v_EL....~_30,5~::.. ---, - ---- - ------- - ,,------- ----" ---- -- ------ -- ------- -- _____n__ ------- -----~U~8-INLE1--- ------- -------- - ------ ------- -- ------- ------ -- -------- - n --------_~-~~::~~~_=_=,_--_-__--------
---------.-..--. .- -:fD'i4! ~l':>~PV~' ....... ", RIM EL ~ 34,92____ __ _ _.
EXI5T11'!G I'" WATER'] ,~ " EXI:;TING 6"____, I E:<I~TING }'.";-_. / I, IN'J EL = :52,12_________________--------~-_~~~=::.::_=::_=_____~____------------T-----T-----
I L ..,./ . PIJ\, WATER )! PV', WAIER I 0'(1 "'8 " ___,,__------"---. _____________" ,
.--.--:~;;~::~~~~=~.-~~=~~:~:~~~~~~~===~=======~=~~l__{~
/ / : / / - -:: ....-- --1-.-..- ____':-.'-1 14=-\ / "f ./- - .-----334. 60' N 89"51 '21" [ "'" '" e~, ~ \ -
- -- --
- - I- - ____ I '-===-=- .- \ Ii I 1 I I "II II l.. ~ '\<1 \ \ '
1- - ,v --:.-.:c~=-~~L-:::oL,/' - L ~__ -. ---, ,>. ' \. . II I/'I I ! I" J! J ~~~LM I", \ \
! / /' / 1 . ~ 11,.""',..JLi~), \,~,-v ~ / I I I I I ~~)/ (i,. RE, LATE 1+ \ \
/ r ~ . I U \ / ' ~ ~ .. - j /~L~Jli' , . I,
I I 36'1'@K..~7~77>/ TTl I \ <l" ~ 2(.~ LM ~ \ \
' .' / , " / , ,,' /!J \, - ,>1. -rr \
/ \ \ t ,/ ,/ ,/ /' ,/ / / / /1 / " ;, . <. I ,,~/ "-" I : "
\-- . ~~-~/ ", /~LOCA~ I i \
/ \ \ 'I' ""-. / ~ " ,,,--- i 'I
o 11;/ d. ,ril 1,'~~1r~E1H1-)'"I II. ..,~ 4J '- ! " / ~~~2~T~:'T~R~~CTION ~. \~;:-"" "I : \ \ \
e lea I "I .,' ,~~' K . P H CLUST<R i::U--- \. .' . TO BE SET ON EXISTING GRADE.. REL~CA' II \ 1- -.1 \ \
}'1 I / b!.' ~ I J q / \ I h" I 14.... z I I
. I I ~9t i;or:!r:'1 l~" l __ ________ ~ / / ~ \1c7r~\) I I i ~ 8'OAK I I l' P~LM iI ~ ~ ~ - \ \
3,\823 /)~}. If I; I ~ --r-------~, \ /! \ II I II / I \ ELO~lj I, -----l~ ~ \ \
f1?1/=:rl q I - ll-;f; - --- !i \ il \ I 1 j.. ~" ~__1 c:N~ 0:: i I
I L~/ .---+--_._...--.;..':.-.~~ L III =r~:j ~ -~'7: I \ I.~I ~ i ~~ ! ~ ~.I.-1--.: I ':~c ~I t~ : \ \
;"- ..b~':'LL..:L., -\'-=-- '-'.-'/,/,/<'/////, /, I \\ "I I '\'::i
\ ---- - ~"""::_,,,,:~----E"""""'_ \~ '- 0 (,.1
II \ -----:c-""'---='---d.________ J \\~_;j " I I h I PALM ""'( \ "1
: I '" k / / '~'==';" -CANOFY ELEVATION T6 I" y --------------~jl I \ '-.J \ II
: IS" ""-. ---- ,/ /' '- - - WANE~QOG-SYSTEM - ..... ' 11 I \ -.J \
I I C :=-.::::':::-=:=~ - - - - - TREE BARRICADE RELDC~H I I I
" " 'JALH r:LUSTfR 4-5 _--=-.~.-.,--_._~.. j~' PALM
=::.c,::;::::?'; / "', \ /"'" ~AL/I' CLUST<R 4-8 J-- - -JJ _
EXISTIHG-------l,--! tL.I <~~~~.:"o{. f-- -- I _// J') IF~':L"I I' Ii" I I II REL"i ,? ,~. I Q. \ 1
~ II~r 1'1". Bank "_. /' "l' I I I I . I I i_ I il I \ \ \
I F 18,1 Hoor .- ~~o ~ ~=-J: l~ I ~~ I ~c. 1 ~ I ,~ .k-~ ] ~ I ~~ ~=1:::J --1 \ \ II
I l. 0 Q ( 1)1) (' F 0 ----.L--R~C;~-F~UN~~tl;/ ;;-~~~.- TREE BARRICADE \ \
;s: "t};?L, C ~~. . . \ \ \
I I , I "-. ') .. ~ - - - - 8;;~,~c~I-;'-w~-~---1111 (i -r- __ "\\,'~ _ ~:i Ao2-rII, 6--.--4-~3--' _~__:-:x______~I- - \ \
-(11II'1:' _J---==-- 6"YR;:T~INING WALL 5 -- -- v' !
I I I IltF'- 'II 1'\' I~( / II I '~// \ \ I
I I il I II I' '.--- _ I I r---.:... !,m!\JT.lo~_/// ~ I L TREE CANOFY/ROOT ZONE I \ \
-r-- I C'\J ,'/ POM! /-------).-J L \ I
: r /~~--\ ,.. .CANo*,RWUCTrON..,:\:::\;:~;;-.J ~ " n ( (: IJ//'i--~".~...."''''-'.\ I
I -- B / g:,,;,~ -7Jg";Sl'21" W -', /\ i 3S. 00' - - ~J lrl<:_ r-~'C"'=='--_._------=) I \
I I · \ / I} 14' P - TREE BARR.ICADE [J l ' I \,
. f\ '~ I
I ~ ' . '~<Dj! '"cF~~ TREE CANOPY/RWr~ON~d II \
I( : I
~: "'I [1'------------------------1- I /1 \
i.j II ~ i, I // \
\ II (0 col I I /~____--- XSPHAL T PilRKIW _/ I
'i!: :,~ ~II 'I ) / \
i II :tll ! I
i I - II I \
\ : 61i I ~.sFH."L!
I m Iii J
\ B ~//
I ]1
m /'11"_,
: FLUlvl[' I
<< i
I
~ '
~~!
::::; a I
~ V:l I
~ ~ I
~ ~ I
I
~ ~ I
~ ~ i~
a ~ I~"
r:JJ
~~
c< a I
~~
~ ~:
~ ~ I
I
~ ~ I
~ a I
atr:;
~
E-,"CI'I" " 0" C'I'
..I__,.I'il,:> 0 _.,
I
I
I
I
w,.\ TER ---.----..
R
.
I
I
g
a
I
I
I
I
I
B
I
I
'II
\ J.
\ I
\
\ ...
\
1
\
I
i
".,.. ll'.J\iERT :::: .)O.~lE
N 89048'45" [
rF=:::t25~ ::=1
11-;;--- ~i
)( I
I
i
\
,
i
i
,
\
.J::=~=-~
...~---
';".
r
I
i
i
I
\
\
\
\.
\
I
\
\ ::~
V'I
..
~\
w\
i
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
I :
\ \
\, -J i
i
i - \
I \
\ ~ \
\ C::: i
\ i
\ I i
\.-. \
I \
1\ tI) ~ 1,\,
:'.r
Q,
\ : ~ II
\ ~" \
\ l.a.J I
'1:2: \
I I
\ - !
\ Q. \
I
1
\ . \ 8IJUAHU~,
" 0 ~ N:f RE;;:;'ON POND
le,J "0"1
\ \
\
__ L-. __L
--
I
I
I
I
\l~
l-
I
'[
I
\
i
i
1
I
\
\
\
\
i
I
,
i
i
\
II
I
II
~\
~I:i
'" I
'" Ii
C'\JI
o
-- f~
~~
r/J~
[][][[]]
~.-.-._.-.-.-'1
~
r . 4 ~ . .AI
~ I
I TREE PRESERVATION TABLE I
TREE ELEVATION TO I II
TREE ELEVATION TO '41
TREE BARRICADES"*
TREE AERATION (WANE 3000)
CONCRETE
ROOT PRUNE
ROOT PROTECTION ZONE
CANOPY REDUCTION
PALM TO BE RELOCATED
\
. I'
r.c
t".ll
lJ) I"
N)"
-,
,',I
"
l"r.c
xl~
I
I
I
'I~
",I-r)
"I Q:)
.'\ C::>
la
I~
,.:
() 0 :
\
\
\
\
,
\
\
,
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
i
I
\
\
\
\
I
I
"* ALL WORK INSIDE THE TREE BARRICADES, CANOPY DRIP LINES,
AND/OR TREE CANOPY SHALL BE SUPERVISEDIIMPLEMENTED BY AN
ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST.
~ PROTECTION/PRESERVATION NOTES AND DETAILS ARE ON SHEET L 1.2
T
U
f-
o
i
I
(\
o
[t:
15 I
~ '\
'/
~I
CUI
!.t......
at
8\
I
\
I~
l~~
I
<.:)
z
i=
tlj
X
W
AREA INSIDE
BARRICADES
~
o
II
ALLEN (P)
MAGNOLIA DRIVE(F)
. ._----._-~---~----~------- ------------
'"
~I
u_ I
01
eel
0,
""I
1
(
\,..._"-~-:.:::::==--_.._-_.._-,._-,---_.
n.....--nreIi'- ~' Ai!']}' kl,L\,j~;I<!hjC,
(Tl'P)
o
I, ~ --' ~:I
~ .---.....J1
5 89051 '21" W
42.94 '
CL
C;.
1-
CURB iNLF:T
RIM EL := 35.1.)
S I~,j\/ EL = 32.25... -',
" IN" r' = ',713 ',.[ --. \
L . _L ~4' I (D'
n_ __, __ ____ _________________----L::::'.,l
i
i
__!IF-
-- -----.-----------
(22' ASPH.~L T)
~1i:lI -,-
I
P I
.~J I
,J I
-NOlE-PALMS TO BE RELOCAlED AS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE SllE PLAN
ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS ARE ON SHEET L 1.2
SCALE: 1"=20'
20
o
10
20
40
l_tIl
.w
..
~ t
Ii'lO
(
o "-
I"
~ Ii
~ m
... III
II" Z
, -
II" "
.. Z
. III
) III
.. e
IW '"
IC Z
~ I-
ea ~
fiJ 0
... ~ Z
. ..
~
l- ." Z
Z II" '"
~III
III Ii' I-
~ ...
III!
Z .
0 t
. I
III
>
Z
1M
.
"
Z 1ft
- .'l .
Z III ...
~M
Z eM
. .. ..
.. .. Q
.. II ~
~ :1 0
11. -'
Z u"
. .~ ..
~
.. :111I
..I-
1111I .
. ",. ~
c:
.. \III~
~ .~ ..
c:l
\I H\I
INES Comm.: !
0731
I Drawn By: -
N.E.fl
IChecked By: H.G
II
ssue Date:
Revisions:
No. Date
~
~
~
II
03/2510~ ~
Descriptio!
& 06/05/08 PER DRe
Ii -
/ /
Ii / /
Ii -
/ /
Ii / /
Ii / /
6 / /
!
~
~
d
~
~
@
c::J
~
~
@5
[!!g]
rJ!JiJ
~
@5
~
~
~
@5
[?
~
LLI
I-
Z
LLI
(.)
....I
c.(
Z
e
-
U)
U)
UJ
.....
e
Q::
a-
U)
:::.::
c.(
e
Q::
e
~
Q::
c.(
:E:
I TREE TABULATION TABLE I
47 mEES INVENTORIED ON SITE (NOT INCLUDING 9 WASHINGTOIA PALMS) 3/30/05
TREE INVENTORY NUMBER
10 PALMS PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED 1 SABAL(#23) & 9 WASHINTONIA
35 mEES RA lED 2.5 OR LESS ON INVENTORY 1-8,9-12,14-17,19-22,24,26-28,31,32,34-36,38-40,43-47
21 mEES PROTEClED INC. RELOCATED PALMS"
10 PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED 7,8,13,18.25,29,33.37,41.42 (PALMS DEFICIT AT 2.S"DBH EA.)
1 TREE TO BE PRESERVED (10 PALMS RE-LOC) 30
10 PROlECTED REMOVED /21 TOTAL mEES PROTEClED" = 48'l1i REMOVED OR 52%RETAINED
184 TOTAL INCHES REMOVED (DEFICIT INCHES) 192 TOTAL INCHES PROPOSED TREES INSTALLED {nof including any palms proposed or relocated}
PROPOSED INSTALLED PALMS 3/1 CREDIT WITH A HEIGHT OF 10'CT (FOXTAILS PROPOSED ARE 1 O'CT TRIPLES)
14 SABALS + 10 PINDO = 23 24/3 = 8 + 10 FOXTAIL mlPLES = 18 X 2.5 = 4S"CREDIT
192 + 45 = 231 CREDIT - 184 DEFICIT = +53"CREDIT
{INCLUDED IN TABULATION ARE THE PINDO PALMS PROPOSED FOR PLANTING IN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WA Y}
II
J " ----~-----
-----
CR A TE iNLET -"
GRA l[ fL .37,17
!IN EL - .35 4-f.
PLAN TEi<
. -------------- AREI'.
i 570Ft! !/VCJC'D FF..'AM [
C1OA1lvft-,~.IC\/{4L BLJ/L [)//vC'
,.L//I/-! ~:~ H [I} /~L ()Q,R !
I
EL[i/L1 nON = 38 .2,)
BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, INC
GOLDEN RAIN NURSERY, INC.
4203 46TH AVE. N. ST. PETERSBURG, FL. 33714
H 727--521 --1684, FAX: 727--527--7422, E-MAIL:RONSPLANS@TAMPABAY.RR.COM
CRb,T[ it.J;...LT
r'":eIE [i ~ j' .~
// INV D. = ~~~)_e:-'
DRAWN BY: RON BELKO
CHECKED BY: CHUCK BUTLER
Certified Arborist : FL-1235A
~
~
"""
Y')
I
I')
I')
.....
Y')
Y')
Z:;c
O~
~~
~:)
~...J
<(.1-
I~
I-.u
~
oc(
u.. .~
.~
V)~
O..J
OJ
ii
[1 ~ D~)
ii
l3
c::
:i!
~
~
....
II
....
.!O
'"
~
!II
;'1
~
:i!
~
~
....
II
!'>
C)
ii
!II
;'1
!II
;'1
(':'is
'..'..,~,;
;."
'J6.Zf'
~ IJ ..
.. ~2
~ OJ ~~
..
.
~ S_'JI C
,J6.Zf
,
~
l
I "~I
I
~, ,'NCL rlfAIL
~ ------
~rt--~-
~
~
I @1T!A\~OIfD@ @OIT~ ~[!,!A\1fD :J
I ~ I ~:~~~,R':::,~ PROFESSIONAL CENTER
~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755-3422
Z;::a j;j"
. .
_ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~. li
- - - " - ~ rg Ii'
~ !1 ~
~ 1 e
n ~ &
iil
iNonhside
~ S-'<<4.111e.
CIV... LAND .L4MHlHC. IHVaOHMINT AL
)00 'OUTH IUCHiR ROAD
<UARW A. TEll, FLORD'" JJ7.' I-MAIL: (~~~~ 44~~.::HF,~~~~~~~:::CC::~
FOR T HARRISON A VENUE (P)
SOUTH FOR T HARRISON(F)
--------------;,.--..--------------------T----
i
I
i
i
PINELLAS
~
~
~
~
O~
t-<t-<
......t-<
~~
b~
l( >:I~
I ~
~
~
l(
I
'"
I I ~~ I
I
~ .
.
~ B
PINELLAS TRAIL
--
()
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwatl~r, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 7.27-562-4865
CASE NUMBER:
~ Clearwater
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/2007)
~PLEASE TYPE ORPRINT~
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
SNKR LLC
1815 Health Care
809-1146
FL 34655
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
EMAIL:
SNKR,I, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company
"-"'~-'~__mw_"___'~_mm_mm_,~ww'u'u___m_muu_u_~m__m_mmu---~__n_w_w~_m__~_"'W__'__"_'U_U___'___u__n__m_mm_'m____m_u'_~~,_N_u_'__~__'_mmu_,_
List ALL owners on the deed
~~'----'-"~__~_'_____m.'u..m____^__'__~_'_m,.,~____"-'-'_~'_'___"'~___U__U"_____~m.__~_~__,.~
,.,. - ......-......mu...._u....__._..___.__.__.~._._u____.__mu_......___..__"m__.___.___,,_.,,__...._._,_""_._".~m____.~..._ m......_.._~_m."_____._._._'"..._.m_._m_m'"____._.._._.~_.....m"'__.._._,__~____"
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
-CELL NUMBER:
Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner
--____._..___~___.._.._"'____.._'N. ,"m_,___w,_,',,'m...___ -'.W_-~-'-_~_n"'_n'__~''"''_~'_,_'__..'_mn_'^_^______m__~..____mn.__.__
300 S. Belcher Road FL
727 -443-2869
._.727=2J5=rf4.Ts.._.w..........
FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL:
renee@northsideengineering.com
mm..._n___u___...m.m_'_m~____.....___,___.___~__._._,"_____.....,___
- "
. '.' I
_.....-...,-.-
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
--., m'V'^_'_'~~,~"m.m_",__._~",_~~".~__"..___",____,___,__~_~~"",~_~_"_~~w~,___~""",,,,,,",<__~___,~__
V-~'---'~'_~_"__~"^"'_'___'~__'~~_~"~~'~A"__~V___~,_______
_.'....'_m_m.m......____m"'_.__~__'_m'"........___~,.._._.__"'_.~___m_.'_ n'".'",_^W_m.m_____m'_'"m._._.__m_~_m_"'__'"__"'m_____m__"._._..~_ m",___,"_'N_"__'_~__~_.~__.
,.-..._..,..._--_.__.~.._-'---~~-_.,----,._~._-------~-'"-------
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for deveiopment under the minimum landscape
standards
SEE COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE
n.m_'"_~_m_"____'_m.__mm_n_m_'_._,'".._.___...~___..m..._m___.--.~_-n____~_'''~'~.....w____"w'''''''_'''m..mm'~'''"_''''____~~_m_.w~_n__...w."'"_______.__m___.....m_~_'__nw_
...,-...-~_v_._..__^._.~,_O~y___"_n_._'"~_u_.m~'~'~w.,.,~v~.,_^..^.~''"~~_m_~___.-~__,~..__,_..__..____..^_=,~~.,,___.~,~~,.,',~-----^~.--_____._,_'_"_m__
....._""-'y--~-"--'---_.~--~--~~---~...
C:IOocuments and SettingslderekJergusonlOesktoplplanningforms_ 07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
Page 1 of 2
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
SEE COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
SEE COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE
<_"_'~"""~'___"~'_'''_''_'~'_~,_~__.V_;_=_'_H~__~~~~~',,_<<<.._~_;_"'_~_~___~__~_._...........__""___"_~____~.__..._"'>___~_--..,_......__
'~"~.._.~.-'_',_.'_.-.^.._.__.__~~._~...__.>_.____v~_U___~__"""~~____'_~__~,__.__._._~H~___~"__'__..~_____~______.~_
WW" '_"~n'__<_'~^"m'''~''.''m~~._,__''__'___M'_''_''_''_'''''~~_m~._"_____~~,"'~h~'m"'h___~'___~"n_NhN"_""""_____m",,'''~v,",""^"'''N,''~ "_m_'_'_'__'''~'___H______~.~''NN~_~__',__,,_,,~__,~_~~__
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
N/A
'0 _~......_._._.._~ ~_"~'_""_____^____~~________~_~_m__________.____~___~~__v~_<__._~_____..___~~__,...___________
H'^,n'_>_~~~.~__~.~""_._,,.m_#~~_~'~'_'H~~~~_._,__._,_~_~~~~"~.~-~<'--<-'--_.__'__'~_~~___=_~'~~~,,~v~.____,,_,y__~,~~,__<_~=_,.....#_,~
..."u"m.,._'___.h'____.~~__~_"_______~,,,w_'_'_m'__#~'~~,~_m____"_mww~m_."__~_A_~~~~______~A__~~","_,_.._,_____~"v".m_m_____"m'"w'm_y"___~__~,~__~_~y____
^.__~_'m___"_.__.m"_'.~_"~____,_~_,,.__,_~,____~__~____._'Wm.L~"',,,,__,_,_____,~__~^W~,_~_,__,__,~.____,__~_______.~m__'m'__'m__"''',,__~___
. .-. -_..._....~~'~_._..<<-~-_"___._,~____.~"~~H_____~~___.___~~_~_~~~~"'__.._~_____~_~
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I, lh undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this ai=Plication are true and accurate to the best of my
kno le~ge and authorize City representatives to visit and
ph og'raph the property described in this application.
/,
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE7AS
Sw rn to and subscribed before me this day of
, A.D. 20~ to me and/or by
, who is persomilly known has
.' L-.-,--...----.-.--.--.w--.-.,..-.-----.---.-.".-.-.".
~ alure of property owner or representative
produced
as identification. , .'\ '.-
~:?:~l!~~=i1~-------,--
My commission expires:
._-
J;\'IoU~(.
~'WJi
I'tOf\\.1:i
1.aoo.3.NOTARY
OCRl:cN A. WILLIAMS
MY COMMISSION # 00576718
EXPIRES: October 14, 2010
FL Notary Discpu~1 Assoc.Qo.
.._~~
C:\Documents and Seltings\derek.fergllson\Desktop\planningforms_ 0707\Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24.07.doc
Page 2 of 2
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARRATIVE
Case Number:
Project Address:
Project Name:
NES Project:
Date:
FLD2008-05014
1001 S. Ft. Harrison
Harbor Oaks Medical Center
#0731
June 10,2008
Request: A reduction to the landscape buffer along Magnolia Drive and the Pinellas
Trail from 10' to 7'.
1. Architectural Theme:
A. N/ A B: The plan provides plantings beyond the mInImUm code
requirements with four tiers of plantings along the majority of the Ft. Harrison
frontage and three tiers along Magnolia Drive. The plan provides over 85 new
trees, virtually all available green space has been utilized within the landscape
design.
2. Community Character:
The proposed landscape treatment is designed to provide years of benefits without the
disruption of building function, drainage and utilities. The landscape design includes
just over 1,800 new plantings, consisting of 28 different varieties and will offer the
community immediate visual rewards.
The design provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment and is
pedestrian friendly. Once installed, the landscaping will greatly enhance and improve
the streetscape and community character. Further, the location of the development,
uniquely situated adjacent to the Pinellas Trail, will result in the improvement of
approximately 135 linear feet of the Pinellas Trail boundary with professionally
designed landscaping, providing additional rewards and benefit to the entire
community.
3. Property Values:
The quality of the proposed plantings, together with the professional landscape
design will offer upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity.
4. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan:
The development is not located within a Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan
6.13.2008 Revised Harbor Oaks NES 731 rmr/RMR
FCM
FfI)
~
Ow
~~
zS
WJi
~Z
Z
o
.:E
.'
fit
~
wlfi
JIii
~I
~
I'
20.0
I
... -d
.... ~
~t~~i m~
;E~ :::::: I OJ
'::. 0
:.:.:. (.) a
.:: 2r.J
tiis. :::::::::::: .
'::. C"t :::::::::::: q.
. .. ,.............. .....
.... ........"........ ......
... ....... .....
~
--
,;~
~\~)
\,\'
ASPtW-T
NOIr62W E
APPROX3U.G1'
I~I
11.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tlrtp)
II
II
I~I
35.7
I~I
$4\
S 89'OfJ.'OO" W(M)
135.0lr(P} 135.5-1'(M)
,.or 4
)C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
d II-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FQt.
MOr
FCMofW
fflV1
~
Il!
I
II
P,I ;r:
I; ~f
I ;s
64.06 TO FCM
64.47 TO FIR
64.56(D)
S W5%OO'W(BASIS OF BEARINGS. PER DEED)
If
WALK
"18V'J
.IV"
8 89'(;2'00' W(M)
APfROX204.74'
#"
~
~FEEr
tfCP
HCF
LP
I~I
I~I
t4W-18ll9"E
"-(0) -lM)
m6/l'
..
FR
VACAfff
LOT
I~I
Etfl1WtCE
< - ~ DRIVE
W~ ~
BUIlDIiG "
FAtE
Z 18G.OOlP)
0
OVEnIWtG
(f) 8.7 OfF
-
~! LOri
a I~I
~ ~
.::>
t:~ 8UI.OtfQ mS iii
0,1Goo C
:3:.......-. LOr 1 I ::e.... -
t- ::Em UJ
=>> 8 &-!
0
~.. en
WOOD I~I
~
CJVBU-Wf(J
l.iOFF
lOTI
NCF
mROX.
41.28 FEET
i \
J
Ii
ii SQ
. {.btJ ~S
:lCII ~I
". an
'(Iftl; D -w
11"
~
@
I~I
w
if
,I
(I)
37.711(M)
Fft
!
SCALE: 1"= 20'
...
f
!
-\JI"
--
i~
10m...
...
IJf)
LEGAl. DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 1,2, 3,9, 10ANr.l11,BLOCK34,MAGNOLIAPARKAS
SHOWN ON A PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
3, PAGE 43, OF. mEPl.JB~ICR&OORDS OF PINELLAS
COUNTY, FLORlmA;'T(,)(JEJ'HER WITH APART OF THE .
FORMI!RRAlL ROAllJRIGHT OF WAY LYING EAST OF
SAID LOT 9; BLOCK 34 OFMAGNOLIA.PARJ( 8UBDIVISIOti.
TOGETHERWITHI..0T 24.BI..OGK 32, MAGNOLIA PARK
NJ SHOVVNONAPV.TllIBAEOF, RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 3, PAGE48,OFTHEPUBI..IC RECORDS OF
PINEI..LAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.
. 0
~ ,l \1
4 \...
"< l1 .~ ~ ~
15 Jl 5 ~
1~4 J~{
r~ ~ 41{ll/l
~. flwi * l!dl q1i!1
'l- tM 'fj 1~8 III~. J~~j~~ rs
.oC I 51D . · a..... ~~IDQ\O~ J
Li5 t!s I mi~ ; sttb~$ -I=UJ~~~1t ~
.1 i: · ~~~ a-iii~'! i~~3!~ gg
't> Ints I 8-15 · o..1!t :J"'lHiQ~ J
~ ~~ffi ~B~ ig!~J~ :I~~~i ~~ ~
J Sl;:' · ~eL~ ltlf' ttt. ~ia~tlg -i;g ~
~ 00::' t~ a:~ljfa:, "'-<~!J.Ht 9~ >C
il{ I t:!i glt:di.1 i~litm~~ Ii:~=.
~.~LI~ ~~~ m ~lur~f~ ~~~1!5lf~t l!;(iJ....:I '
. ~~....~ I!! m ~fijl r: ~gZ ~~ ~~....:I
. ...I~ :c~i5 iZifi1leila th.all. ~ ~~ ~
0a::J u~z m" ! 5 _:::II'"Q 0. C - .
ZOCll 1i:J ~ . ,.
I IS b ~~~!~ ~ ~..18 ,
I ~il!!~f a~twtl~ ~!~ .
IJ a~ i~bfi ~ z~~.
~~ m~m~IB ~~ ie~
IlJ 1!5f!,f15 · .I~!f BB~
)( ~~ei~iSI..-==1 & ~,I,~
I =fi~n;I~~~jif j~"i.. . ..
B u ~ :1Sl!! . ,$' f!! .I
1.113~S~i~!. ~_I~! d fl
~iSlI:~l5~ ~fi i-rf s:I >::1:
~~i~~~:lml!l: ~ irl8
~~~ ~~'" ~~.... I ~ I Ie ~IO
II ~~Iii! l! ~;~ t ~ "I ~ il
1\71 :.g~!. ~-latRi .1' ~R~ --
~ ~~ei ~~m~ ~..I.;~ ..
~~~~I'i 8111111:: .~ 11 it... z
zziS c:~ 0 Ehtfrf 0 ~' Z
~..q.iii Q 0::
~~~t8:; ~ . ~
.
~
-:;{ II
~ ~
J .. l/l
S Q eJ
rr. if' ~
~r '1'" ~
;t: If' rf)
~-:-
oW.
'-1.
#'
FR
1+ tI h tJ #{JJ #leJ
(.(' WI' \l be R-*'1l1 vJeJ.
,-JD;J ~ h'Jh LljlfteJ
JTh,/J~
f
1m
~I
I!J
"'I .
t
..
I:
l
I
. .
~.
.
U
Z
~
::f
o
u
..
~
~
'0
z
~ llC
. ....
~a i
O. In. ~
~-
Z :=i. ~
t-. rot
OJ. 1
~ ~
U r-.
~..J I
~.~
::f ,..
J--4 -10)(
. to- (7)<
Wl.O'"
~ i1i ....
~,fI)<
fill(')
~:;)g
-< IX)
0::::t..{1
mOl(')
IO~""
100"t
Z -lirt
II ~
:t
~ ~i5w
t...Wu
t...z-
0;:)0
-0>
=- 10 be (Il tn6ved
I I I d
!
Tree Inventory -1001 South Fort Harrison Avenue
Prepared by: Alan Mayberry, Cons,ulting Arborist
I.S.A. Certified Arborist #SO-0305. ."
March 30, 2005
The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry and includes findings that I believe
are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of
Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and this report
is factual and unbiased. This report is the property ofFuluicco Divel10 and will not be
given to other entities unless so directed.
Site Overview and Canopy Analysis
The subject property includes a former commercial building and a single family
residential house. Historically, the property has been cleared of all native vegetation and
even the larger native trees are second growth. The tree canopy is composed primarily of
the native live oak (Quercus virginiana) and laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) trees. Palm
. species including the native sabal palm (SalmI palmetto) are also present. In addition, the
site contains an admixture of exotic trees that were planted by the previous occupants or
invasive species such as the camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora) that grew from seed.
The mid-story vegetation is comprised of planted ornamental shrubs and various grasses
make up the groundcover vegetation.
The overall condition of the trees is below average as the site trees reflect neglect and
improper maintenance. However, a small percentage of the trees warrant preservation and
, they have been identified in the inventory. In addition, several trees are border line for
preservation and will be upgraded if remedial maintenance is perfonned.
Tree Inventory Data
A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a
. valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could
lead to failure and cause personal inj ury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four
codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the inventory
data:
Tree# ~ location -Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that
corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the
field.
'i
Size- Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If
a fork exists in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area
below the fork. Palm species are measured by feet of clear tnmk. Clear trunk (shown as
c.T.) is measured from the grade to the base of the bud. NOTE: lfthe crown spread is
required to be shown on a plan use the following formula: The croWn spread is equal to
l' radius for each inch of trunk diameter. It is better to use this formula than the actual
location of the branch spread as a tree will develop roots in the opposite direction of a
lean or one-sided crown. The crmvn spread for palms is 6' radius from the trunk.
Species - Each tree is listed by itscominon and botanical name the first time it is listed in
the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter.
Condition Ratinv; - The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural
strength and systemic health. EIem ents of structu re include: 1) the presence of cavities,
decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and
attachments, i,e" well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the
trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader tmnk, presence of branch collars VS. included
bark.
Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net
photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health
will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree
as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overalL condition rating
include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount oflive crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2)
crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the
tree is making and storing energy.
The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any
unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen.
Increments of 0;5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as
follows:
o~ A dead tree
l~ A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease
or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1
ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating
of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury
or propertY damage. .
2 -. A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with inc1uded:~
bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown diebackt.'
cracked/split scaffold branches etc: In addition, a tree with health issues such as l~'~y"
energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiertaj~s
or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the prol1I dn>,{s )
can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typicaIIy require a considdt,able
amount of maintenance to qualifY for an upgrade of the condition rating.
3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be
corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal
area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon
have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average
appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible.
4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems
that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive
appearance and be essentially free of any dehilitating disease or insect problem. The tree
should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees
exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can
be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic
amenities relating to their age, A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and
should be preserved.
5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health
and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this
category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in
. this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity
and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value
to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is
worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation.
6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior
qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown
ratio, fonn (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness.
A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures
that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an
undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an
experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (l.S.A.) Certified
Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree.
Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not
covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may
include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It
may also pave recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree.
NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as
drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance lil1d
severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial
maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely
affected have the tree inspected by a qualified Interna tionaI Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist.
******** At the time ofthis inventory several trees were in a total or semi- deciduous
state. It is difficult to assess the live crown ratio and overall systemic health of a tree
when the foliage is not present. However, most of the oaks are now producing catkins
(flowers) consequently the density of flowers and/or leafbuds were llsed to calculate
systemic issues. **************
Ti'e'e Inventory
Tree # Size
Species
Rating
1 10"
laurel oale (Quercus laurifolia)
2.5
Comments: This tree was not identified on the tree survey but has been added. The tree is
growing in a planter and is located 3' from the rear wall of the commercial building
fronting South Fort HaITison Avenue. The root collar and tnmk are free of decay or
cavities. The tree has three codominant stems located approximately 9' above grade that
have severely included bark and that support most of the tree's canopy. The tree has
average live crown ratio and below average fonn. The codominant stems could be
mitigated by subordinate pnming but tms procedure would be costly and take at least
three years before structure was restored, Recommend removal of this tree.
2
7"
deciduous
2.5
*Note: The crown of this tree was totally bare at the time ofthe inventory and the
branches are growing over the roof so an identification of species based on
morphological elements was not possible. The species will be provided as soon as foliage
appears. .
Comments: This tree was not identified on the tree survey. The tree is growing in the
same raised planter as tree #1. It is located 5' south of tree #1 and 3' from the rear
building wall. The trunk is situated against the edge of the planter. This tree has a tight v-
shaped crown that is composed of two scaffold branches. The tree has average form and
structure and good live crown ratio. Recommend removal.
\
3
8"
live oak (Quercus virginiana)
2,0
Comments: This tree is not identified on the survey. The tree is growing 5' iI-om the rear
ofthe commercial building. The crown of this tree is composed of three scaffold
branches that are codominant with included bark present in the crotches. The overall form
and stl1lcture is poor, The tree has above average live crown ratio and is systemically
healthy, Recommend removal.
4
8"
laurel oak
2.5
F
/'
Comments: This tree is situated l' from a shed locatedin;the rear of the commercial
building. This tree has below average form with average(structure a:~d live crown ratio. It
has 6 surface roots which is unusual for a small tree (surface roots grow on top of the
grade and can be at1ributed to site conditions or genetic characteristics). As this tree
grows the surface roots will increase in size and cause problems to structures and create a
trip hazard. Recommend removal.... .'.
5
22"
laurel oak
0.5
Comments: This tree is not shown on the site plan and is actually growing in the right of
way of S, Fort Harrison Avenue where it grows through an awning attached to the old
produce stand. This tree is severally declining, It has basal wounds, tnll1k cankers,
internal decay and a dysfunctional systemic system. It is in imminent danger of falling
and should be removed immediately. Contact the City of Clearwater's Urban Forestry
Division (562-4950) as they are responsible for right of way trees.
NOTE: There is a palm growing in the right of way and also some on the property that
were not inventoried because they had less than 10' of clear trunk and are not considered
protected trees by City of Clearwater code. All palms having clear trunks greater than 10'
will be inventoried, '
6
34"
laurel oak
0.5
Comments: This tree has massive internal decay indicated by the presence of heart rot
sporophores colonized all over the trunk. The root collar and large root flares are .
suffering from decay as a result of previous physical wounds. There is a large area of
decay in the form of decaying stubs 6' above grade. This tree has no upper crown
structure as the only foliage is resulting from vigorous suckers growing from the
decaying scaffold branches. This tree is hazardous and needs to be removed.
l,f"
7
30"
live oak
3.5
Comments: This tree was in fll11 flower (catkins) at the time of inspection and appears to
have above average live crown ratio based on the amount of catkins. The trunk and root
collar are healthy and free of any debilitating problems. This tree has two major scaffold
branches that form the crown. They are codominant but have a wide u-shaped crotch with
connective tissue present. There is an 8" dead stub that needs to be removed if the tree .is
preserved. The tree has good form with interesting serpentine branches. The crown is
somewhat irregular in appearance but still has above average aesthetic qualities. This tree
will benefit from pruning to remove stubs and small deadwood in the crown. If preserved
and maintained properly this tree will evolve into a very good tree. Recommend
preservation,
8
34"
live oak
3.0
Comments: This tree has a 4" diameter girdling root that wraps arouild approximately
30% of the tree's root collar. This root will injure the tree but has not caused damage yet
and could easily be removed. The trunk is sound. The crown is composed of two scaffold
branches that are codominant. The crotch has a tight u-shape that has connective tissue at
this time but could become included in the future. The upper crown has above average
overall structure. Part of the crown grows to the west over the rear parking lot of the
commercial building and has some'damage in the fonn of torn branches and branch
wounds likely caused from large trucks that drove beneath this tree. This portion of the
crown will need to be raised if the tree is preserved. The crown of this tree is barely
average in appearance. The fonn is irregular and there are gaps in the canopy and it has
very little crown to the east. However, the tree is systemically healthy and could evolve
into a good tree if preserved and maintained properly. The main crotch should be cabled
and braced as it is codominant with a tight crotch that will become included. As live oaks
are long-lived trees that adapt well to construction, this tree could be preserved if it falls
into a green area. However, it does not warrant site design modifications for preservation.
9
29"
laurel oak
1.5
Comments: The trunk: has a 12" x 12" area of decay on the lower east side close to the
base. The decay is not causing structural problems at this time but will progress and cause
problems to the root collar area in the future. This tree has an 12" and an 18" diameter
codominant trunk that fonns the base structure for the crown. The codominant is
severally induded and there is a large bulge on the west side of the inclusion indicating
internal cracks/wounding. The upper crown has poor structure with small cavities, decay
sporophores, suckers and large dead wood. The crown has low live crown ratio. This tree
is not salvageable and needs to be removed.
10
9"
Schefflera (Brassaia actinophylla)
1.0
CommJmts: This tree was not shown on the site plan. It is growing 2' from the chimney
located on the west side of the old house. The tree is not recommended for preservation
as the schefflera is very cold sensitive and produces a large surface root system.
11
16"
laurel oak
1.0
Comment: This tree was attached by connective tissue at the root collar to a 24" diameter
laurel oak that is now a 6' dead stump infected with Hypoxylon canker. The decay from
the stwnp will affect this tree's root collar area as tile decay progresses into the basal
area. There is also a queen palm that is growing against the trunk of the laurel oak. The
tree has an old flush cut wound on the northwest side of the trunk that is causing internal
decay. The tree has virtually no upper crown and stmcture is non-existent This tree needs
to be removed.
12
10' C.T.
queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana)
2.0
Comments: This palm has below average crovm and appearancefoca queen palm. The
base is growing against tree iF 11 and this condition will prevent the palm from being able
to be transplanted. Recommend removal.
13
IS"
live oale
3.0
Comments: This tree is growing agalns'dhe concrete wall of the front porch of the old
house. Ip. addition, it has an avocado tree growing against its trunk. The root flare is
healthy but is somewhat asymmetrical where the avocado tree interferes with its growth.
The trunk is sound and forks 8' above grade into three scaffold branches that form the
upper crown. The tree has good upper crown stmcture with average overall form. The
live crown ratio is above average. The appearance is only average but will improve if
maintained properly and given room to grow. It is a borderline tree in regards to
desirability for preservation and should only be preserved if it falls into a green space.
14
6"
avocado (Persea Americana)
1.0
Comments: This tree has poor fonn and structure and is an undesirable species due to its
cold sensitivity. Recommend removal.
15
20"
laurel oale
0.5
Comments: The tnmk of tree #16 grows at an angle into the basal area of this tree. If they
continue to grow in this manner they will wound each other and cause structural
problems at the critical root collar area. This tree has a very poor upper crown structure.
One leader is dead with sporophores growing along the branches. The other two branches
have been previously topped and are dying. Recommend removal of this hazardous tree.
16
12"
live oak
1.0
c'
.,
Comment: This tree grows at angle out from the base oftIce #15. The tree has poor
structure as it has virtually no crown. One branch grows on top of tree #13 causing
damage to a lateral branch. This tree will be damaged when tree # 15 is removed.
Recommend removal.
17
30"
live oak
2.0
Comments: This tree is grO\v1ng east of the old house and abuts the east side of the
driveway. The root collar and lower trunk: are sound. At 4.5' above there is a galvanized
steel cable embedded into the trunk all the way around the trunk and again about a third
of the way around and six inches higher on the trunk. The cable is totally embedded
except for one area where the cable tip protrudes from the tmnk. The girdling has caused
the trunk to grow callus tissue around the wound resulting in a pronounced bulging of the
trunk tissues. I estimate that the girdling occurred approximately 20 years ago. Just above
the girdled area the tree forks into two 15" diameter codominant stems that have an 8"
bark inclusion. The upper crown has good structure and appearance. However, there is
approximately 25% dieback probably due to the girdlii1g activity that destroyed part of
the tree's vascular system. The tree has apparently restored most of its vascular system as
evidenced by its growth. A major concern for this tree however relates to the location of
the decay resulting from the girdling. It is located just beneath the bark inclusion and the
chance of coalescing decay creating a structural hazard is probable. This tree has an
overall attractive appearance but giVingJhe potential for structural failure it is
recommended for removal. The only alternative is to place rods in the crotch and cables
in the upper crown to secure this tree. However, the procedure is expensive and
impractical for a tree with the above described damage.
18
23",29"
live oak
3.5
Comments: This tree was not shown on the site plan. This tree has a galvanized one
quarter inch steel cable going horizontally through the 29" diameter trunk but it is not
girdling the tree and is not causing a structural problem. This tree splits into two trunks 3'
above grade. The trunks fonn a u~shaped crotch with connective tissue present and do not
appear to have a structural weakness. The 23" diameter trunk grows to the north and
develops an average crown in form and above average in regards to live crown ratio and
structure. This side of the tree is somewhat restricted due to competition from an adjacent
. tree to the west. The 29" trunk forks 6.5' above grade and develops a croWn above and to
the east, west and south. The overall crown oft11is trunk has above average form with
good live crown ratio. The fork has a slight inclusion that should be cabled and braced to
ensure stability. The tree needs pruning to remove small deadwood and stubs. This is a
good overall tree but should be cabled and braced in the southern trunk fork and have a
rod installed between the two tnmks for extra protection. If this work is performed the
tree would be upgraded to a 4.0. Recommend preservation.
19
25"
laurel oak
0.5
Comments: This tree has a wound on the south side of the trunk that starts 6" above grade
and goes 3' high up the trunk causing internal decay. The tree forms a codominant 8'
above grade. The trunk on the west side is completely dead with sporophores growing
along the trunk. The trunle on the east side is dead at the top and only has sucker growth.
This tree is hazardous and needs to be removed.
20
12' c.T.
queen palm
2.5
Comments: This palm is not shown on the plan. The palm has a below average crown and
has been affected by competition from adjacent trees. Transplanting on site is not
recommended for this palm as it would be more cost effective to plant a new palm.
Recommend removal.
21
7"
laurel oak
2.0
Comments: This tree has a good tmnle that forks 5' above grade and f01111s a narrow vase
shaped crown. The fork produces a codominant situation that will become included in the
futme, The live crown ratio is good but this tree has very poor form due to overhead
branches and is not recommended for preservation,
22
3",3" 3", 2" 2" schefflera
1.5
Comments: This tree is not shown. on the survey but is a protected tree by definition of
size for a cluster tree in the City at Clehwater code. The cluster has average aesthetic
appeal but is not recommended for preservation as it is an undesirable species,
23
10' C.T.
sabal palm (Sabal palmetto)
5.0
Comment: This is an exceptional palm that would be a specimen if it was taller. This
palm has a near perfect trunk and crown, The boots (frond stubs) remain from top to
botiom but they serve to protect the trunk and can be pruned off to have a clean trunk.
Recommend preservation or transplanting on site..
24
40'
laurel oak
1.0
Comments: This tree is growing l' from the sidewalk along MagnoliaDDve. The
sidewalk has been jogged to save this tree, The tree is also growing just east of a power
pole into an area labeled vacated easement on the site plan. This tree has four codominant
trunks that fonn the crown, The east codominant trunks are severely included. The north
and west side tnmk attachments are not included but have weak attachments. The root
collar on the north side of the trunk has had two flare roots severed and decay is present
in the affected basal area. There is also a large trunk canker (sunken tissue) on the north
side. A large scaffold branch growing to the southwest that is dead is cracked and ready
to fail. The tree has cavities on the scaffold branches on the east side that are affecting the
tree's stability. The upper crovvn structure is very poor as the crown has large deadwood,
old stubs and major dieback. TIlls tree is hazardous and needs to be removed as soon as
possible.
25
10' C.T.
sabal palm
3.5
Comments; This palm is growing 15' due south of tree #24 and is also located in the
vacated easement. This palm is healthy and has a good crown. The condition has been
downgraded slightly because the crown has been impacted by branches from tree #24 that
have affected the symmetry of the crown. 111is palm will evolve into an attractive palm.
Recommend preserva!ion or transplanting on site.
Note: There is a small five stem cluster Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) located
just east of tree #25 that is not large enough to be protected by City code so it is not
inventoried. However, it has value and can be preserved in place or moved on site.
26
5"
Citms
0,5
Comments: This tree is 90% dead. Recommend removal.
27
9"
laurel oak
2.0
Comments: This tree is growing beneath the crown of adjacent trees and has very poor
overall form. The crown is mostly one-sided growing toward the northeast and the live
crown ratio is, average. The structu.re d~~ngrades the overall condition rating as the main
farle is a codominant stem with included bark. The inclusion will worsen over time and
could lead to structural failw'e in the main crotch. If this tree had a balanced crown the
codominant situation could be corrected tllrough subordinate pruning, however, it is not
practical for this tree. Recommend removal.
28
5"
laurel oak
1.5
Comments: This tree was not shown on the survey but is inventoried as it is a 'protected
tree according to City Code, This tree is growing l' from the base oftree#29. This tree
has viliually no crown as it is suppressed by tree#29. The canopy is small and grows to
the east. The tree has poor stmcture ,and essentially no aesthetic value. Recommend
removal.
, 29
14"
laurel oak
3.0
Comments: The trunk and root flare are structurally sound but this tree has a girdling root
on the south side tllat has caused very minor damage to the root flare. The girdling root
can be removed. This tree has good overall structure and above average live crown ratio.
This tree i~ a healthy and structurally sound tree with the only downgrading factor being
the form. The tree has very little crown to the south due to competition from tree #30, a
large live oak tree. This tree could be preserved or removed to reduce the competition to
the more desirable live oak tree (#30).
.f
30
33"
,live oak
4.0
Comments: The trunk of this tree is sOlmd and forks into two large co dominant stems 6'
above grade. The crotch of the fork is slightly pinched on one side and will become
included in the future. The crown spreads to the north and east but is somewhat restricted
due to competition on the north and south. The crown is slightly thinning on the west side
but overall has very good live crown ratio. This tree is a good tree overall and the crown
will develop symmetry if the adjacent trees are removed. Potentially tlus could be the
best tree on the site. In the future the main crotch should be cabled and braced if the bark
, becomes included. This tree is worthy of moderate site plan modifications for
preservation. If this tree is preserved the site design should allow an undisturbed rooting
area equal to three fourths the tree's dripline. Paved surfaces can count towards
llildisturbed rooting area if the paved sl-lrface is built on grade and aerated.
31
25"
live oak
2.5
~
Comments: This tree has a sound tnmk and root flare and the upper crown structure is
average. The south side has a few sucker branches that grow upward fonning a mass of
foliage. These branches should be removed as they will not form a canopy and are not
attached with a branch collar. There is an 8" diameter lateral branch that grows to the
northeast that has a badly decayed area and this branch should be removed. There is a 6"
diameter branch that has suffered stpnn damage and needs to be removed. In addition, the
tree has a large dead stub and minor dea"dwood that needs removal. The overall fonn is
poor as the crown is mostly one-sided and lacks aesthetic appeaL The tree is systemically
healthy with above average structure and could be preserved if it falls into a green area.
32
47"
laurel oak .
0.5
Comments: This tree is vel}' old with large trunk flutes and cankers (sunken tissue areas).
The trunk has sporophores present indicating intemal decay and there are many old stub
cuts on the trunk The tree has two vel}' large codominant trunks about 25" in diameter
t1mt have a pocket cavity in the crotch. The upper canopy has seven scaffold branches
that fonn the crown and each one is broken at the top with major dieback and deadwood
present. The only growth is from suckers. This tree has poor structure, fonn and live
crown ratio and is a hazard. Recommend removal. .
33
>1OC.T.
Senegal date palm (Phoenix redinata)
4.5
Comments: This palm is not shown on the site plan but is a protected palm as it has stems
with over 10' of clear trunk. Tllis palm actually has 5 stems with over 10' of clear trunk
In addition, it has several other stems of various sizes. The palm cluster has not been
pruned for a very long time and presents a wholly appearance. However, the palm cluster
is healthyand once pruned would be extremely valuable. This palm cluster should be
pruned and preserved in place or moved on site. A second alternative would be to contact
. a palm broker about buying this cluster.
l~-
34
22"
laurel oak
2.0
Comments: This tree has minor basal decay on the southeastern side that should not
debilitate the tree's stmctural integri1y. The major downgrading factor of this tree is two
severely included codominant scaffold branches forking 5' above grade. The bark is
deeply included and the.condition will predispose the crotch to fail. The scaffold
branches support a vase shaped crown with below average live crown ratio, structure and
form. The crown is restricted and grows to the north and south. The upper crown is in
decline indicated by tip dieback. Recommend removal.
35
32"
live oale
2.0
Comments: This tree is growing 6' from a retaining wall for a retention pond located just
south of the south property line. The tree suffered root loss when the grade was cut for
the retention pond as reflected by branch dieback in the lipper crown. The trunk and root
flare are sound. The trunk forks into an equal codominant stem 5' above grade and the
..
crotch is u-shaped with connective tissue present. Tbe west codominant has a 4" diameter
cavity from a previous stub cut that is causing minor decay. The form and associated
aesthetic appeal is low and the crown has a heavy vine infestation. The live crown ratio is
above average on the south side but low elsewhere ,in the canopy. This tree is not
recommended for preservation. However, if it falls into a green space buffer it could be
preserved but will require remedial!naintenance to improve the stmcture. In addition, it
should be inspected every two years foy'the presence of included bark and the need for
cabling and bracing.
36
4"
camphor (Cinnamomum camphora)
0.5
Comments: This tree is not shown on the site plan but is protected per City code. This
tree is actually a cluster of sucker stems (one was 4" diameter at 4.5' above grade)
growing from an old stump. The tree has no structure or form. Recommend removal.
37
10 C. T.
Senegal date palm
3.0
Comments: This palm cluster was not shown on the plan but has two stems with over 10'
of clear trunk and several others sterns of various sizes. This cluster has nQt been pnmed
in a very long time and if cleaned up could be preserved in place or transplanted on site.
, 38
10"
citms (calamondin)
2.0
Comments: Thiscitms has a basal decay caused by a fungus that is progressively deadly.
The fungus destroys vascular tissue which is reflected by dieback in this tree's crown.
Recommend removal.
39
8"
citrus (grapefmit)
1.5
Comments: This tree has major dieback in the crown and is declining. Recommend
removal.
40
12"
citms (calamondin)
2.0
Comments: This citmsis in poor condition and is not recommended for preservation.
41
1 0 C.1.
Senegal date palm
4.0
Comments; This palm has four trunks that have at least 10' of clear trunk. This cluster
has not been pnmed in a long time but would be valuable if cleaned up. This palm cluster
is located 3' from the west wall of the house and may not be able to be successfully
transplanted. As this palm cluster is valuable, preservation is recommended in place.
However, if the palm does not fall into a green area, a palm moving company could be
contacted to determine if transplanting is feasible. Recommend preservation.
42
28"
live oak
3.0
..
Comments: The root flare and mmk are sound. The lower and upper crown has good
structure. The live crown ratio is above average. TIle form is below average as the crown
is irregular and branching is minimal with foliage often tufted at the ends. The tree is
systemically healthy and has good structl1re and will improve with remedial pmning.
Preservation is not recommended l!'ple~~)he tree falls into a green area.
43
21"
laurel oak
0.5
Cornments:This tree has a very large caVity on the southeast side or the trunk that is
causing major structural problems. The tree has very poor upper crown structure with
codominant stems with included bark in the crown. The live crown ratio is below average
and the form is very poor. This tree is a hazard tree and should be removed.
44
38"
laurel oale
0.5
Comments: This tree has an open cavity on the south side 6" above grade that reveals a
hollow trunk. This tree is very hazardous and needs to be removed as 8.000 as
possible.
45
15"
camphor
2.0
Comments: This tree has a straight trunk but very poor upper crown fonn and structure.
The crown resembles a stalk of celery. The live crown ratio is average. The camphor tree
is identified as a category one ecological pest plant by the State of Florida Pest Plant
Council. Recommend removal.
46
18"
live oak
2.0
Comments: This tree has a good trunk that divides into three scaffold branches that
support a crown with very poor form. The majority of the tree's crown grows to the
southwest. The tree offers very little aesthetic appeal. The live crown ratio and upper
crown structure is average. The downgrading factor of this tree is its appearance.
Recommend removal.
47
24"
camphor /
0.5
Comments: Thistree is covered top to bottom with vines. The tree has essentially no
crown structure or fonn. The tree consists of a trunk with only a few lateral branches that
have foliage tufted at the ends. The live crovvn ratio, structure and form are extremely
poor. Recommend removal.
[Xl~~[;3@~ @~~~
[MJ~[Q)DCb~[6 ~~~1F f= K
l
01 (.'1 "'"U .""':. t ,-.,,~ 1;"14."" i do
m: tU iIIlOIIfIICIl. (lU'l<<Nl' 10 . ux.um
CIlIlOllF MIl5aUJl(ll rn...
~
~
~
~
. ,..,,, "..,,,. . ,,,..,, ,,,......, . ,..."It.., . ,,",,",,'" . ".,,, ,,"' ".....,,,,,,,, '""",,"<<1. ''',''
(1""""'('H"'I\~' .......7110-' "''''''.171 S'\on~X "'",.llX ~'\:~'~~J~'II" ""\',OXI 1'.,,(1.,.1
I
. SD~
\~ '"'~::':"~, ,.",,""-
;:li.H()!I.IIHi
r
\ \
~
:I;
:1.\C ---
. _.4'"'~ '"". '-
I ... I.:;~~... .-C> -r~r:>.c.:!' H . (;c ."1l c.:!' .- HI
.ULdR'_ n
. ~',\Lb=:::~' '" . i\..'~
" .-:-:-. _~SJIER "". I
- . . ARCHITECTS'
o ..0 "..," \III ._,,_..~\\
_ -'''- _ _ _ Jl Jt_ _ _ ~ \\..,. I..
-
f!f!b~" c I.. ; L.. ~ c ~ ..~ I> 1 n ... .~ ~.. Nt,
~ ___- - I
.\ ,~.. ~..~~ ..\\t~ ~J
~
iii
I,
~
:!I
:D
en
-I
;:n
o
o
:D
;J2
~
I
I
I
I
I
--------~--------
I
I
I
I
I
----+--------
!
I
I
I
I
~
~ J;
~
~
22'6"
22""
12'S"
22"-6"
u~~
16'-0"
IllI
-c
~-
a
t t it
...
1---------
23'-0"
lJO'-."
FRST FLOOR PLAN
HARBOR OAKS MEDICAL CENTER
~
FORT HARRISON AVE. AND MAGNOLIA DRIVE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
22'-6"
24'-6"
I
k:-~~~-~~~-k~!
~ U I U U I I '
I
I
I
i
---------~---------
i
I
I
i
i
---------~---------
i
- -
-------
16""
~
AND ASSOCIATES, NC.
ARCIfIECTB
f'l.AI.t..ERll
NlBIOR llEIlOERB
MOlOD44
ZI5 EJ.EAII JD. CLENlrA1S\ R..... 027) ........
~
~
8
~
~
= I: .t;
1-8"
___.....-m_1llIDI1
H~I'lD'Un'..__-.s._
ISICIl.EaI'D.IID____1lIl
I.-WIIUl~lI""'_IlBIICIa8."
1Ie1Ulll.....__. 'JIll_a
=__..IIalCIiIDIlNJ._
.HIISI'CI',,--'H__
JIUI5_IDDIIDIU...KlM-.E_
....lDB.lfRCI.u1HlSlII:.
~
f<<
o
o
i5
i!I
~
;g
~
~
0:
1J2'-0'
I
i
i
i I I I I
i i i i i
j J L --J-------J---------
-------- i--------- i----------i -- i i
~ '
:: I I J__________L________!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-l----------l---------~ I
.......;....."......<r.......~.r......T...1 ji .1
, , ~ I '~::: i
---i--------i------- i r-----i--- :r-1i -1---------
i i ~ i B
i i ~ i ~ i
i i Ii. '
i i i
~
~
~ ~
22'-6"
23'-10'
24'-'"
~
16'-10.
22'-2"
22'-2"
~
J.t
~
J;
22'-'"
,....
~
~
21-2'
23'-10'
16'-10'
22'-2"
22'-10'
1311"-4"
. !J! IP~ SECON> FLOOR PLAN AND ASSOCIATES. NC. ___Ill. -.
K~_ -:-:
~$~ .11III'..__
HARBOR OAKS MEDICAL CENTER ARCIfIB:lll -- &L~~
~ .--. .....
~~... PLAN\ERB ...--
iiJ N!EIW:JR llBlICJER8 --
q FORT HARRISON AYE. AND MAGNOLIA DRIYE AA COllD44 :':~~~HH-==-'::"
~ CLEARWATER, FLORIIA D511E1J.EA1111D.<lSMl1S\ FLIR4(721}...... ......om.EFfEl:IIil1lS..
CD EAST ELEVATION
1/8'.1'-(1"
~.!l'-.l/2'
ROO'PEIl<
~~6~~
~2!I'-121'"
FIOCf"OEQ((HIGH)
~14'-2112'
""""FlOOl
"""FlOOl
CD NORTH ELEVATION
"""<III<<
1/8'al'-Q'
o WEST ELEVATION
1/8'-1'-0'
~4!l'-41n'
ROO'PEIl<
~41'-6112'
ROO"""""
~J2'-2112'
TCP ~ P.wKT
",28'-21/2'
ROCfOECl<(lOW)
~ 14'-' 1/2'
SECOHOFlOOR
FlHISH FteX.
'-0'
-<III<<
1/8'''1'-0''
.,,35'-5112'
ROO""""""
~~1k~2'(HGH)
q,~:~D2~~
_MOO
"'SH<III<<
tlNlK PMlrT'IPES(II~ CCl.OR
@PMlTT'If'['1~'-9IRIIt*1.Wl/S-!l1l?OD4-
@ PMrl'TTWf:12 "MU.fiI'-SHERMNII.J.lMdi-SW6J7t
@ P1MrTYf'E'l "rJOSTONE'-Sl€NN'/IlLl.WrIS-SW0028
@ PAM TYPE I. "c.AR'rSla"-SHDlWlWl.J..lMlS-SW6178
@ PM<< T'If'[,5 "Rol::lkIooo TEFIt4 COTTAo - HIMN IIl..l.WIIS-smoJ
@ PHNTlYPE'6 "GAOUfUD'-HRlINIllWIS-SIl108f
Ii
It
.u
h'
oi!
i i.6
I :!I
COlOR LEGEN> CD
SEI 'ca.CR CIIItRIA' PAOWl([) Il'i'.lROfJECT PRIM TO TIt: P\mI,I.SE (F PMlT.
-
WI
"'
.,
..
"
.......-
~TERW.T'IPE 1
,,-""
"""'''''J
......."".
.......""
""-'"
srAlCICU.(llllUlIIXf'5UJl'-I\lC-QAJ
caw. srM: - TOSSl flEEr -BY OWENS 00RNtIG
RNSEIl =...
.......... ...-..
"""""<11I<<"'"
t.4A TERIAL LEGENl CD
SEE '\iATeWl am:Rl.I,' PIIMlElIl'i' .w:tmtT PfKWl ro IHr Pl.ROIAS[S,
~45'-41n'
ROO'PEIl<
",41'-611'1'
ROO'''''''''''
~J!)'-51/2'
ROO' .IJ'OHT
1Il::::'1lECX(LDW)
"" 1.' - 21n"
SEalNOFlOOl
"""FlOOl
"""<III<<
I
. ~
~
_ I ft
~ M ~
i I ~i! I
II:
III
....
Z
III
o
~~
<III
iij~
...Jfn
W~
C
15~
~=
~~
III
ii
CI
c
:I
I
=
i
Cc
I&l!il
>'"
CCI
~~
!lei
"'...
"'c
;lit
11:=
fd
REliAS[l)FOR:
OIl
PER'"
ClJ<SI1l.
RE\1~:
110/15/07 CmnI
/1/01
4 SjU/rA DRC-ct\liI
WltllAMJotf!\HIR
A~(Hln(T 00lQ~19
1\4.1
t!ssu Date: 8 15-07
"Pro" No.: 270J6
"
L /
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
=-:t me- r:::jf -wI -lL =tt :::::Jr -lL ~ =ID-=
I III II II II II II II II II II II
-~ --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i i
~l1- __--,1___________--,1__ ---0---
~,....----____Ft_ft- ------- . w
= Irfjl = I ~ ~ ELEV.
= 18\ = I I ZS~::::I
=IUI= I I Q:
\111 t5
=1111= I, II ~U I
=Ittl= (
=IUI=
1111 I I
=1T11= I I/'\ I
=~= I ~
=IUI= II 'I II Q:
1111 1\ ~
=1111= I I '-- 1\ VI
=IRI= I I I TI
"" 'i I I '~J
: i i II
I I I II
!..! i ii
IYIASS LANE I II
~~- --tm---------~ -----------B~---------_fQ~-___)-----
I I :
I I I I
:.. I I :
I I I I
I b I I
! I :
I I I :
i" i i ~:
I I 1:::::::::::::==
II II
--,'" n n
l=~=
=IMI=
=luI=
III1
=Inl= ~
=Itil= ~
=:n:= N
=1*=*1=
ft~ . ~~
90'-4"
26' 8"
26' 8"
24'-4"
12' -8"
I
=-D~}~--~-J Wlt-~L4 ~~= ~=
I
I
II II II II II III II II II
--
(0
I
-:.:t
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I I
.:.r- tA =j'
~
LOBBY
::
(0
I
N
N
... ..
- ~ ...
--^-
cill
(0
I
(0
..-
::
o
I
N
I"')
......
t::
(0
I
-....,
N
(
~
~~
~
J \
l
::
(0
I
N
N
I
I
I
I
i i
i i
I -----$ __---$___________J___
~--- ---------- I --------- I r
Iii
, i i
,......,
i U STAlR2 \ '\
I
I /
K
\
::
(0
I
N
N
1-
1
-
-
-
II )
IL/
I
I
I
I
26' 8"
26'-8"
26'-8"
80'-0"
I
t::
ex:>
I
~
~
/%wn
.',',',',';:',', .',
'" ,(0 ,
:':.::::~:. J~ I rf~
N,~ ~~
(0
I
(0
......
-:.:.-
I
o
I"")
..--
t::
(0
I
-....,
N
t::
(0
I
N
N
(0
I
N
N
o U(f)
(f):ZW~-
-<(~ -~
:z - ~3i
~~!5:szeg?
~~~gOG
Sgj:~sao::
~~~o~~
'Zo3l::Z .
8~~~m~
:zffi ::J:8~
~iJi~~a:::g
~G:S.....:z~
a:::.....(f)O~l1.
~O=>I:;=>a:::
~~l5~sO
::lffio~:Z~
<(l1.woa:::=>
~~~~~~
Cl~W!:W:Z
:Z(f)alg::alw
3i3o~li;Cl .
~(.J""(f)=>a:::S
O~b~:::E~ffi
(f)w:zg:OI-(f)
~~sa~~!i~
.
:::E
=>
0:: :::E
:2 Z
... -
:::E
l'J
~~
1- al
~~
1- :::J
;~ B:
I.. <(
1::1 .
1'J L&J ~
!~ ~~
1- E sa
~~ 3&: i=
1I
~:i ~~
~:::Eti
_o~
:2(.J
:..
~f5W
.~ ffi ~
~::J:ffi
1- iO
~o8
13 ::J:
(f) Cl
I.. :z
'J (f)-
1- :z 9
1= ~~
.
co
,
!
~
(j S
~ ~
- 001 R
CJ) c: ~
W w
I- t5 ~
<( 05 ~
g ~ O)~ ~
CJ) ~~~ il~
~ 0 ~~ ~ ~
o ~~~_~~
z .- ~
<C '~~
a::
11.I
I-
Z
11.I
o
-I
C
o
Z-
<cO
-111.I
a..:Ii
a:CI)
o~
OC
-10
LLD:
1-0
WID
a: a::
_C
LL::I:
III
:= .
... '.
IJ :
t.~
tiC:
....
... '.
c:-
II. ..
i1.
(~ .,
III:
III"
I
III"
~: .
"I i'
tit"
III: C
..i sa
::: i' a:
III' 0
.....
:I': I&.
c:_ ~
C~_ a:
.... w
mil I-
m~: c
III: ~
...,. ~
.... a:
m.. c
mJ.: ILl
c:_ ....
m~. U
RELEASED FOR:
BID
PERMIT
CONSTR.
-
2 10/22/07 Cij 1 Cmnt
4/1/08 m NER
5/13/08 Of C-COM
WI LLlAM JOE FI ~--1 ER
ARCH ITECT 001 )829
~ CD FIRST FLOOR PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"
~ A2.1
f--
I
\}
.
~ Issue Date: 8- f 1-07
~.Pro:ect No.: 270~ 6
"
L /
:.
c.o
I
":q-
N
N
I
'C-.I
N
:.
a
......
I
c.o
......
:.
a
I
'C-.I
t")
......
It
a
......
I
r.-,
N
N
I
N
N
:.
c.o
I
'C-.I
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
-W-------------$--
--------- I I
I 4 J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------1--
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------~--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------4--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----------1--
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
26'-8"
26'-8"
90' -4"
26'-8"
24'-4"
12' -8"
:
a
ELECTRICAL RM. ELEV.
26'-8"
80'-0"
LOBBY
N
I
'C-.I
N
...-.
10:::
~
U')
RATED I TENANT SEPERATION CORRIDOR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---r----------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1-----------
I
I
I
I
26' -8"
......
I
N
N
:
a
......
I
to
......
:
a
......
I
r.-,
N
N
I
'C-.I
N
c.o
I
'C-.I
N
IX)
I
':q.
I
b
t")
......
~ CD SECOND FLOOR PLAN
o U<n
<nzw;;[!!;-
- < i= -~
z - ~3i
~f:Q!5~1!eg?
!:I:!~~<">o:J:
Sg3i~sa~
~~~oi=~
!Zo;l:Z .
8~~;m~
~~z~~~
I=;:<n-C;:~:::J
~C;:S.....z~
~.....<no~a..
.....0=>!Z=>0::
;;[!!;~~~SO
...Jffi zzW
4i!~~8!5~
oo::a.. [jJ~
~a..8ffiO::ffi
Cl~wl:wZ
Z<nCOo::COw
3i3o~ViCl .
al!<..>I-'-<n=>o::S
O~I-f3~e;;;:
00:: t:l
<nwZa..OI-f3
~i=sa~~~o::
~
=>
O~
~~
~
:n
z~
2co
,-<
;)<">
-:::J
:!:a..
~~
0.. .
'~ W w
....i=~
:E:
~~~
~~~
j:~1-
::>0&3
z,><= <..> ~
>-zE:::i
:Ei:i:iz
ffi-
5:J:f3
_;!Zo
',:n~o
.... 0 <..>
~~Cl
.... z
2:~9
::>:55
- a.. co
.
,
~
(j ~
~ ~
- ~r. R
CJ) a ~
W l4 A::"
..... c: ~
<( or. <
g 5(1)~ ~
CJ)~ffi~~d
CJ) :J: Z (if a:
<! ~j~ !
o <C D...~ ~ HI
~ ~
a:
11.I
I-
Z
11.I
o
...
ze
<Co
-J-
a..fiI
a:=t
OU)
O~
-Je
LLO
Ca:
Zo
Om
Ua:
we
(/):1:
u
.
-
I:
~
'C
-
...
:)
2:
~
C
E
~
z
C-c
-0
11-
>a:
CO
....
Ell.
'.....
"" 1ft
~a:
~- w
1:1-
I:
C-c
1:-
a:
--c
J:w
::>....
tLU
RELEASED FOR:
BID
PERMIT
CONSTR.
,WNER
IRC-COM
WI LLlAM JOE I SH ER
ARCH ITECT O( 10829
3/16" = 1'-0"
o A2 "j
~: .~;
rp--='-='-='-='-='-='-='-='-='--r-='-='-='
II I
II
II r=------...L--
Ir------ --
II II
II
II II I
II II I
II II
II II I
-i:--{j-- ---r--
II II I
II II I
II II
II II I
II II I
II II
II II I
II II I
II II
-I 11-_ -m----------
-,--II -
I II
I II
I II
I II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I II
I II
I I
--1--1L--
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
-1---4--
I: II
II II
II II
-.J II
rr- - -=- ~ II
II II
II II
-
I
',]
~ .
~ Issue Date: 8-15-07
~.Pro:ect No.: 2~ 136
"
MARK PAINT lYPES (lei PAINTS)
~~
~A
"
T=
-------- -------~
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I NOTE: ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE LOCATED < ~
) - ON ROOF AND SCREENED FROM VIEW < ~~~
~ ...{"" ^ ...f , -^- .A -^- /A~
> ~\ r
( 38'-2 1 /2" < I,... 32'-2 1/2" < .....
"'I". "'" t ~ TOP OF RIDGE '/ ~ V TOP OF PARAPET <~ l~
""",;~-^- ~ .A -^- .A .A -^- ~ L
1==1 ~..... - - - - fa r=
~ / f--
-<, ~
----11__ __ ___ -r--- __ __ \\-C
- -'III ~ II
~ A n
LvA
--------- 4
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
@
@
@
@
@)
@
PAINT lYPE # 1
PAINT lYPE #2
PAINT lYPE #3
PAINT lYPE #4
PAINT lYPE #5
PAINT lYPE #6
"SNOWBOUND" - SHERWIN WILLIAMS - SW7004
"VANILLIN" - SHERWIN WILLIAMS - SW6371
"CAEN STONE" - SHERWIN WILLIAMS - SW0028
"CLARY SAGE" - SHERWIN WILLIAMS - SW6178
"ROOKWOOD TERRA COTTA" - SHERWIN WILLlAMS-SW2803
"GROUNDED" - SHERWIN WILLIAMS - SW6089
SEE "COLOR CRITERIA" PROVIDED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE PURCHASE OF PAINT.
I~~I [@[@
( (: "" 45' - 4 1 /2" ~
ROOF PEAK ~
~~~~ t 41'-6 1/2" ~
~ ( ~ ROOF MIDPOINT ~
11~~v ~
.. ~11~ ~~ I[@[@ ~1~~> ))
, "-1 I~~ I ~ 32' -2 1/2"
=rI (~ - <)
-r1/J~~; I ( -V TOP OF PARAPET ~
- - ~~~\;II--- - -~. /;:~ ~ ~~l D%{ (LOW) ~
I I) )
J 1 )
) <
1 )
> <
I) '/ " <)
14 - 2 1 2
rr==r () "" SECOND FLOOR <I
~I ~nl ( ·
n n n W~ ~~ :.
~ ( .
> <
( 1
> <
( 1
> <
(
> ,... 0' - 2 1/2" (37.2') i
~ V FINISH FLOOR <I
~ "" ,... 0' - 0" l
( V FINISH GRADE
MA TERIAl lEGEND
~~~~ ~~~~~
~~ .-A
1".1". ~
'.......
/' "
!'~/ ~
"..J!?"
'- 1-- t------ -- -- -- - -'A ------ -
(
t J4
~
6
I~
COLOR lEGEND
II III
11=11 I WI I
II I ~II I
~iI = ..:; ~
= ;Fo
I w~.
Imll
Imll
Imll
MARK MATERIAL lYPES
MATERIAL lYPE
MATERIAL lYPE
MATERIAL lYPE
MATERIAL lYPE
MATERIAL lYPE
T
COLOR
CD
COLOR
STANDING SfAM ALUMINUM ROOF "SILVER" - PAC-CLAD
CORAL STONE -"FOSSIL REEF" -BY OWENS CORNING
RAISED STUCCO BAND
PREFINISHED ALUMINUM
EXTERIOR GRADE WOOD
T
6
~~
X\ l\l'
X\ ^^ ..J.-
I
I
( 7;'-'--
'-. 'f/ I"
.l
1
<
~
<
)
<
)
<
1
1
- --
r
~
>
::
(> to 0:::
1L:5
? ~d
?
~
>
'.A..A.
-
;d11~1=~
~
r=t
I
-
~. /
/:",,\
'>.. M4...J n n
!II-
F\}]
t--
~
SEE "MATERIAL CRITERIA" PROVIDED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY PURCHASES.
=
=
<
~
<
<
<
<
I--
-
II--
I
---I
~
Ti-
f--
--..j ~
=
=
=-
I=j--
1
~
l
H
I W
CD EAST ELEV A TION
-^- -^- -^- .A -^- -^- .A
--......- ~ - -.,.......
1/8" = 1'-0"
45' - 4 1/2"
"" ROOF PEAK
41' -6 1 /2"
"" ROOF MIDPOINT
29'-12 1/2"
.., ROOF DECK (HIGH)
~ 6
Iii II .1
1111111
Ii Iili Iili
II. II
I II
I II
14' - 2 1 /2"
~ SECOND FLOOR
IIIII
[
CD NORTH ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
1/8" = 1'-0"
~~~ ~~~~
~~ ~~ ~~
~/~ ""''''''I''.~~
"
~'JV, II
;:\\
~\
NOTE: ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE LOCATED F
-^. A. A. ~N A.RO~F !,N~ S~R~EN:D !R~M ~IE~ J
---~~~~~~-----:~--:~ 4
r-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r-- "V" "V' "V' ~ "V"
I ,... 32'-2 1/2" I 38'-2 1/2"
~ / V TOP OF PARAPET 4 > "" TOP OF RIDGE A~~
jK. A. A. A. A. A. A. '- A. A. A. A. A. A. ~~
- - - - - - -fSJ - - - - :2P
"
6
----- --~
/ "V "V' "V" "V' "V" ~ ~ "V' ~
)
<
<
<
'1 /
fA1: 29'-12 1/2" ~<
II ~ ROOF DECK (HIGH)
1 <
> <
1
> <
I
~ <
> <
1
> 14' - 2 1 /2" <
~ ~ SECOND FLOOR <
? <
> <
~
~ <
<
~
, <
> ,... 0' - 2 1 /2" (37.2') <
~ V FINISH FLOOR <
~ "" ,... 0' - 0"
I _~_:~~~~:~~:_~_j
~~
""""""~~
Vr
""~ >
""'~~
35' -5 1 /2"
~ ROOF MIDPOINT
-0-
-1a
I~[@ l'
- - I
/1
I
I[wlt
I"........
~M:
;- "\ /'
\- /
( ';
'1\==
~\
~
~
,
"'--
/
( ~I
-
111\
III
III
I ~IIII~II
I IIttiI
--
11111
=1
II!
-~1
=F==
~I~II~IK= ~
'\. r--. 6
/'
( ""\ ~ A?\.
'- ",,/
C~)
CD
r
6
II
-~
M3
./
I
=F==
T
I
'X\A
I
( "'\"2 \ _
,~ '"
'>
I
>
..,--- t ::
) tOO:::
'-...;;/ I I L:5
f'~,," t ~ d
<lii ::
>
'-^-^-
I
I
I
\..
---
I
f I
~
~
(> =
(tOO:::
1L:5
> N....J
( ..-- u
?
>
~
, .A .A
-
,
J
<&
<
<
<
<
<
D
;:::
=
;:::=
=
/.
)
<, .1.\
~
<
)
)
)
<
n n n n n
=flY =
'" % "-
=- ==- ~GI9 =
W I 1-1 ~[iI 1-1 I
I-- - I-J.l..W
I-
I
JJ.,.LL
I
'=
~
-I
-
~
f----q
~1 t-
~
CD WEST ELEV A TION
1/8" = 1'-0"
L /
o <3(1)
(I)Z",~-
- < jE -~
~~~~~~
...~O~oS:
:J:ujE C)
S~~~!aCi2
~~~ojE~
'Zo3:Z .
o~ <r.:;-
u ~e5~~
ze5 :J:5~
~Vi~~li!~
!G:8.....z~
~.....(I)O~a..
u;.0=>t;=>0:::
~~~m8~
~l5~8~~
o 0::: a.. ~
~a..8ffio:::~
~~~I:~ffi
3i3oit:;C) .
~ul"'-(I)=>0:::8
oi:lI-f3~e;c:
00::: If:j
!a...z a.. 0 1-(1)
jEjE!ai:l~~li!
::E
=>
:::I~
~~
~
:J)
z~
~~
5u
-::::I
~a..
~a..
:l..< .
.n......
....jE ~
x: 1=
-C!a
i~~
j~!cc
~~1-
..;:) 0 ~u
zu
..::
z
O-[iJ
:Ee5~
:S:J:f3
.ni8
.... 0 u
:D:J:
(I) C)
.... z
~~9
;:)~5
- a.. lD
CD
~ 45' - 4 1 /2"
ROOF PEAK
41'-6 1/2"
~ ROOF MIDPOINT
35' -5 1 /2"
~ ROOF MIDPOINT
~ VARIES
ROOF DECK (LOW)
14' - 2 1 /2"
~ SECOND FLOOR
,
!
(j S
~ ~
- 00 R
en ffi ~
W 7 R=:"
~ ~~ ~
-00 O~ ~
o 0 CJ)~~
@ ~ ffi~ j .
rn :f ~li: ~ Ii!
<3:~:)~ !
o <( 0... i: ~ HI
~ ~
a:
11.I
I-
Z
11.I
(.)
(/)..J
zC
O~
-0
1-11.I
~::E
WCI)
-I~
Wc
a:O
Qa:
a:O
Wm
I-a:
XC
W%
11.1
:-
..
IC
~~
.e
. .
..1
f)
:!:
4'
.e
:E
I~
:!:
.e c
IU e
.. D:
.
.e 0
..I
~u.
-
) 1ft
OD:
-III
C....
Cc
e_
CD:
-c
CIII
)..1
I.U
RELEASED FOR:
BID
PERMIT
CONSTR.
4/1/08 0 VNER
5/13/08 [~C-COM
WI LLIAM JOE F I .H ER
ARCH ITECT 00 0829
o
o
';J
f--
I
~,
A4.1
~ Issue Date: 8-1 ')-07
~.Pro:ect No.: 27Q~6
J
I
. -
t
i
I
,
l
i
l
I
i
I
I
I
,
I
\
I
J
.....
,
,
\.
I I
. --" ~ -- ~ "::~:':': ::[: !:,:,~ +" I.,') 4" p:tt:~ i :"5:':: ::f f:J *"j:~'1 4: 1:,*":: - ~..:,'.
I -, T __L_~ "r~' 'I <-j:t: I
l ! i".df.. ""rlJ
',.:".,',:,lJ! 1,',:,',',:,'.11" ... .." "'''''il ".... ''''l'I' "''''1"., ~:~~!':':,',,',::;..~ _',.'.I;F~J.",."'...'.I'.'r'.."_,,-.,.:...'.'~:-'."..'.:_'.'.'.......'-l.:......'...[T..,,;.'" LAd, ...,.......1 ." 1 J
,. "r .~. J :.;;:';.:;::~:~:2]
::1::::: I' \ 'j
:::,IC: , . I,,)
..]~:;.l.1J~.jT~:~d:r.~;::~[l:;q;!
. ~. . . D . . . D. . . tJ. . . tJ. . . D. . 'k
BYPA~ lAIU'I. 21,7 22.4 22.& ZU 22,t 22.1 22' 21.1 22 7 nJ 22.8 22.' 21.7 2'~ IU lir
'..' "Fr''"' '". :"",,~ .... ""'~~1. 'n" .... .... ',,", .... ~t' :,,~ .~-"....:~... ",.. C~V "....:.:.:>
',3., '20: 'uo '21.2 '211 '23~ '21. 'n; '23.5 '120 '2~ '13.1 '21.1 'n.: '23.1 ':ll.2 '22.0 '200 -131'
. ~. . . tJ. J' . D. . . D. . t . D. . . tJ. .
'4.1 ~ n.. 22.7 Z1) Z3 1)4 IU 23.' 2U n.' n.. 2.4 2H n.5 nor II... zo.J 1'j1
+i31 "'",7 '21,7 "20.7"n.a'23 "2p '23.1 '23.2 ',11..4 '2).1 'n.! '2 oJ '23.ll '22.1 ~7 '".1 ',1., '1~1
"~'''''''''~''''''''';''''''''';''''''''';H'''_'';'''''''''-;''''. . . . . . t. . . . . . I
~'u21A~~n1~A~~al~~~'~~~~21A'~1~1
.,u~.".a .'1.3 .28.22. ..,.. .n~ .12.3 .21.. +.8 +'22.2 +.~.1 .n~ ..1.1 ..1.J +to~ .,1.0 +
.."'..:"'~~~..,!,!I!"~!'p..'..'.!!'1;~!'"'..'!!r,.,.' ................,. .,.'
I
"
.......!
1",/.I.J"~iJ
""./}'
1:1
/
/
..,'""
I
I
... -,--.-, -~,,-,-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
-,-_.. - ...-_. +----
I
I
....","i:."~l:
. I .
j ; i ._.:~.<:.t=::,..~:::::.~....
I
,
I
-A....J.:~.:.
FtXTURE SCHEDULE
LMQAfl...,......._T\QnlQ U rlll:o.~ MOIUCD IlrlCUW~~~NOMUID
.~~IOMM.IlI..~\MH...,...,..,.lIAn""VtJ.AlTP'IIU,I,lIItPClllDOl'lM.llHl'll.
.,.IIOlItlf."T\.IIIlWIIM~iI\MIClllllf.
::;,'=:;::::=~~Il""'~',.~llI'lLICfIIOIC..T"""I'IAIII........I.
l~~,.'ll.lIII.HOfCClJrlTflClUAOI'IOCO.IN#f)'f_--.L.....-IDJtAHllNlD_~..,ANt.T""'lAI..Wr
WlnI"WoOUl....._NC_lIAL....T~fQlIICIl'....
"'l.CNICafT,.......COlIIl'l'Ilu.14I'rClCCU'~....-oN-....HDIDIOIT-.ulD.....Sl.lCIIIIDICI~.'NlfI.lUJolT
WlfIlA/olIUM.AITIG.lIllloNC_""'''''''''''''ACTOIIllI'.... .
IIl.l. ""~IICIM'~ -"'..CI'I.~I.IIII.."""IoIUIII'01HIIMMICIleO.
PHOTOMETRIC SITE SUMMARY
CCI'IBBlCllf71 +
.- ...... -.. AlItRAOIliIIlI"IM.JM ......,-..
~~~l .... II .... I
-$-. ~.C;:~ PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
~s)'la.meenglnlet1ng.k1c.
""""-'- ~....._"
.....A...... ~~
...... ..... ...
':.....~~~~:.:':'.::::.-....::~=..
iiii!I"
I'{"-I'..
11.1 ~I
'~I'I. Iii
:1& I' :1.
1I:lilllll
II!!.: =d
I
~ ~
~ I!
IIII!I
5m i
Q.~ i
Q:;! ~
~U ·
:II !~
o ~Ii!
2= ~~
Q. ~ !Ie
~g I~
~I i~
.............
110
PEIUT
alMS1R.
""""""
EPt,O
I
'27OlI
0::
~
z
~
-
-
l
N
-
Oi
It)
;,;
CIO
8
~
-
-
;a
~
X
''It
N
-
Q.
W
di
~
-
Q.
W
('I)
-
ai
~
w
.
Ei
C3
.9
~
S
c
~
B
i
:i!
~
<3
~
III
:I:
('I)
-
ai
~
~
:=
~
...
.2!
VI
u::
OJ
~
'8
....,
w
(/)
<
I
N /
"'
~
Illr[
==
~II~
JIIC
=111t=
11 Ii
==
*r
I
I
~~UlU~~
II~II II TnT In T r=r-=
~--,
+ + + + +
I 11.3 16.7 18.5 17.8 19.3
BYP.A~at1.4 +21.7 +22~
. . . . . I
I ~ A A A A A
+ + + + [] + + + [] + + + [] + + + [] + + + [] + + 1 ~ I?
I 13.2 9.0 21.0 21.3 21.9 22. 21.8 22.2 22.3 21.9 22.2 22.2 2 .8 22.1 21.9 21.2 20.9 19.0 I
~l ~
I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~+otl::AI +otnll:: "\
. . ....- f. . . . .~ . .v .v ... . -. . .
l
I I
k
\
I I
- I - - -{~ - - ~ - - - -
I
I I
I c--;
U \ \
STAIR 2
L I / ~
'----' IBl
)
l!.-/
(
I
-fFl
L..FJ
+
19.~
+ + + + + + +
18.3 19.5 19.6 18.4 19,6 19.5 1 ~.3
A A
~*~#~*~ :
~"1
]J~C
=j"j=
-lie
JII
=411t=
JilL
~
I
1
~ -
w
:2
0:::
~
b/\
ELEV.
~ \
+ + + + +
19.4 19.3 17.9 18.5 16.7
A A
+ + + [] + + + [] + + + [] + + + [] +
22.~ 22.3 22.7 22.8 22.4 22.8 22.7 2~.3 22,6 22.4 21.7 21.4 19.3
13.0 19.6 21.5 20.5 22.6
+ + + + +
13.4 20.0 22.0 21.2 23.1 21.9
. A
+ + + + [] + +
14.1 0.2 22.4 22.7 23.5 23. 23.4
13.1 19.7 21.7 20.7 22.8 23.
+
131
+ + + +
197 216 208 227
+22~
+ + + + +
22.~ 23.0 ,21.2 23.0 22.9
1 22.8 22.6 20.5 21.Q... 19.6
+ + + + + + + + + +
23.5 23.5 :22.0 23.5 23.5 2 .9 23.3 23.1 21.2 22.0
A A I A A
+ [] + + + Cl + :t4 + [] + + + []
23.9 23.9 23.5 23.9 23.9 23.7 23.5 22.7 22.4
+ + + + + + + + +
23.1 23.2 21.4 23.1 23.1 2 .3 23.0 22.8 20.7 21.7
+ + + + + +
21.4 23.0 23.1 21.5 23.0 23.0
+r
I
U- A Ar
Id L/ '--
LOBBY
I\J LA_
..-
0:::
~ dD
en
TI
II [)
V
+
11/13
+ +
20.0 13.4
I
+ +
20.2 14J1
+ 19.7 +13]1
+ + + + + + I
22.9 22.7 20.8 21.6 19.7 13.1
"..".... ~~
........ .
........, .
........ .
.. .......
.,....,. .
~
~
FIXTURE SCHEDULE
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER MODEL NUMBER LlOL T AGE LAMPS MOUNTING DESCRIPTION
A PRESCOLITE LFHSQL-H10-175MHFE-9SRFR- TLGTRG U (1) 175WMETAL RECESSED 10" SQUARE HORIZONTAL METAL HALIDE, REGRESSED
HALDE LENSED DOWNLIGHT.
S't'MBOL SUFFIX LEGEND:
E .. PROVDE FIXTURE WITH MNUMUM 1100 LUMEN EMERGENCY BA TfERY BALLAST (700 LUMEN FOR DOWNLIGHTS).
F .. PROVIDE FIXTURE WITH DR'mALL FLANGE KIT.
P .. PROVIDE FIXTURE WITH ELECTRONIC PROGRAM RAPID START BALLAST N LEU OF ELECTRONIC NSTANT START BALLAST.
W .. PROVDE FIXTURE WITH WIRE GUARD.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. FLUORESCENT FIXTURES NOT CONTROLLED BY OCCUPANCY SENSORS SHALL BE PROVDED STANDARD WITH ELECTRONIC NSTANT START BALLAST
WITH A MAXfv1UM THO <10% AND MNfv1UM BALLAST FACTOR OF 0.9.
2. FLUORESCENT FIXTURES CONTROLLED BY OCCUPANCY SENSORS SHALL BE PROVDED STANDARD WITH ELECTRONIC PROGRAMMED START BALLAST
WITH A MAXfv1UM THO <10% AND MNfv1UM BALLAST FACTOR OF 0.9.
3. ALL FLUORESCENT LAMPS SHALL BE 82 CR~ 4100 KELVN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
~
PHOTOMETRIC SITE SUMMARY
COVERED CANOPY +
AVERAGE I MAXIMUM I MINIMUM I AVERAGE / MINIMUM I MAXIMUM / MINIMUM
I 20.2 fc II 23.9 fc II 10.5 fc II 1.9:1 II 2.3:1 I
:::::::::::::::::0mm~~
..", ...../ /
":::::::::'::::: '/
.,....,'. .
........ .
.,. .
..,..... .
..,..,... .
......., .
N
,~
~
CANOPY PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
Advanced Systems Engineering, Inc.
~
Prolect Engineer
Harold A. Scott
PE-54082
Job No. 8049.13
Manager: HAS
CADO: KW
13655 Aut0m0bIIe Boulevard. SuIte 330. ae.w.ter. FL 33762 . 0fIIce: 727.540.9396 . Facalmlle: 727.~.4<415
Copyl1ght 2008 - ell r1ghla -.ved. No pert of lhIa document may be nIpIOduced w\lhaut the perIllIalon 01 ASE.
""-..,
....~.~~_.......-..i. .
;,.
III
lQi*~1Q i i
'Iii.. ~.~
I ~ ~~ ~ i
i:iPJ ~ *~
II-hI · u
t!s;t!sli ~,~
~I!lb: ! llm
l! !I:I ~i~
II;mb~ ~!x
r*lQ~iim ~i;
III
(j
Z
-
uj
~
~
a:
III
zl-
Sifi
c..(.)
0....
-c
a:(.)
1--
wQ
~III
0:1
0:
J:C
a.. 0
>a:
c..o
Om
Za:
~~
III
:III
-.
a:
~~
c
-.
-I
o
Z
C!I
IIIIIC
:Ii
a
z
Cc
IIi sa
:'1. a:
CO
-I
211.
o -
~. a:
-. 1&1
11:1-
II:c
c_
za:
1-11 c
11::1&1
0-1
11... ()
RELEASED FOR:
BID
PERMIT
CONSTR.
REVISIONS:
EP1.0