FLD2003-10056 (4)
-;--- tolllP[U7 Lf/Gcl H f_
~ Cl' t hY-1 ~ lnL1rzllfl1
J Planning Department . . /
~,' earwa er 100 South Myrtle Avenue
U ~ Clearwater, Florida 33756
~ Telephone 727-562-4567
Fax 727-562-4865
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
CASE
DATE RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY (staff initials)
ATLAS PAGE #
ZONING DISTRICT
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
o SUBMIT 13 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION Including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ , ~"5"
.j: NOTE 14 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Jnlill Redevelopment Project (Revised 06/23/2003)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use additIOnal sheets as necessary
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION
APPLICANT NAME ~A-;I t)..fV 6r;;vtUlt;... L-.l..c-
,
MAILING ADDRESS h5~ L-.J.Evt;.,...A/Vb ~,
E-MAIL ADDRESS ra 'I co..S~"o@.()..()I. looM
I
CELL NUMBER I 72.7. "'-12... ~'&05
C,-fl...A. "fOil/ii..
,
(M~1tL~ owners
(Section 4-202 A)
MAILING ADDRESS
E-MAIL ADDRESS br;-"t\M J~pl-y@ b(L~(-'f' CIM PHONE NUMBER
CELL NUMBER ctJ~. qlct. 7_~~ FAX NUMBER
&.c..,,-
5100
~v,.,. € !:> 1(/ {JLAre. ~{l~ t::"L..
PHONE NUMBER 7'2-7. '('Ie;. 141~
FAX NUMBER -; z., i . '1l.(~. '1/eJO
Lfo l-Tb. ? ~ C'tS<\M' () uAlL ~lirJ
n 'SS
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
AGENT NAME(S)
LJ..L
~~y -gwt>.
~.
SVITE. 2..5' 1
T~P4 FL
~/3 . S~7 . ~33b
~/7,. ut. ~/'&'(,
33botj
B PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION'
STREET ADDRESS of subject site
FL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A1TIJtA.(€- D ~vl!.v~y
(If nOlltsted here please note the location of thiS documenllO the submittal)
~e~ ~1TAU~ b
PARCEL NUMBER
PARCEL SIZE
Q. en /+Ue-S I
(acres square feet)
I Lf {, Lo~, 1\/1 v'M
L(2. J 3b~
.
6F
UN rrs 1~(7l:1t/ ~F'
, ,
(number of dwelhn unlls holel rooms or square footage of nonreSidential use)
Il.. N
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) ~E~If'( 1:.N~f. ~ RESlb&v17.q.L.. fJ~/Tt.. t/6€. ~
/Ut:iAJcc t:- ~.?kz.tt- S ~ (Include> all requested code deVlaiKlnS e g reduction In required number of parking space;, speclhc use, etc )
t-APrv2.€ FoR.. g. ~ 1 L- 6 P,
ee!"T<4~ /I!E.Tr4/
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE
~
Pil(yVl f (W
)//IC
f(
f'
(M; () 77, r!J {'74v1-
- / 'I 4 D D tl!leu~ '-
( r; tf 0 I '2.. fJ.t CP> ~ (~
I
ufl~ f/lrl/() {vf~q-( nt[. ~ mz:::
-.
-
,
- -
x X C/A~ 0 ~
-----
~ ( IT) lJt /i}J S) I 60IL-
~~f ~~~~
~ 1'11 {>~
\, \r
I cf r
&/
-=--
if; DOlt ~~d)
~()
U,Nrf:,
~1~
~fPr1 u
f3TfrlL-; ~ ~ dYl>)
Cf,) If) -::.- ( 3
. . ~-ffA~
f-fE&tU'l ~o pf<g f(J~tt:o
_ ~ . ...-::;7
~l 4 ' 2l OJ
1~7 . ~3-4
--
I ~ if 'z
-' ----- '
~ P(UVVflJ1ffrJ'C. luV- pli~---f~::---~~
--
?,
'Sf L(-lo
J5
~ 'Vo
\(4~
~f tJ
~'/.;
o lJ /iz~
o [1'-0 ~/ Lf f2 'I f ~::: JJ1
(2tQ
jlA~t~~
L1tr ~v->
rz-:.~ 714VYlIJt'-.!F (IJj~
Ib L{ 5) Jib ~ -:=: I s-7
J
q "i-t;
rr tOV -
~
f5cJ-~
I
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRA R OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVI.Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ s, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C .lROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Section 4.202 A)
CI' SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
~~ -
2
r
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (SectIon 3-913 A)
o
-n..t..
-\-
~r" i -l.cJ
PWO~~
"""If] ~U \!A(\IL
UAwVL I ~
)
~
l:
~JbTIf\[c.
::;;
4
3 The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons resldln
use ,
r
5
The proposed development IS consistent with the community character of the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development
tfl
6
v ,1,
tr '^ r ... " i I't ~ . ~ 1)--1 'llf7E..-
!HI /D AI ~ -S~~ fl.C' U~~ ~ i1rl~
The design of the proposed development mlnlm1Zels a~se effects, Includlng'Vlsual, acoustic anaolfactory and hours of operation Impacts,
on adJ~ propertle~ I t1' f. 't,1+,. Ue ,/ W. I
L l'o f..,.~ fl....tA'\ ,(',. t...D+. AJO L- 11\/1 i e-S lal I>t.
Oi~ (~'rl\~t/(,..^f VS(.~ '* JJ.e /)art;., 411- V~fl..,V~ d",v)'C6 IN"; II h L
M,,,\!.~ F!"~ L..v~ ~\-ruA. fflNlTlJ,A/b 41--b~ f!!:t1U//f'r11V)
f~ flf€.- D~ p~
p
o
PrOVide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria IS achieved In detail
L
~ i t-~ t>JU ~v ,~t- .'"O~!,
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application ComprehenSive Inhll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
.
I)
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a rehenslve Infrll redevelopment project resldentlallnflll project Will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties (Include the eXlstln e site an e proposed value of the site with the
Improvements 1,., I ( jl.LL" '" l 1 L ,1),/1 P . ~ ./
-, ~J t\e,vt,..~ Dr ~f-'{I, ~ t\ (t' -g.",. ~i -::tl--'!L , rDJ ~
--W11leJ.~ ~ f~ ./,JJIA '^ #t.. ~V&., ik_ f..JCfS ~"',.; fr*f'J"'1-y VotlVL ;$
C\fe(O~i ~t"l"l> /./ M;lI~ ~ ~ Dn?P'SeJ 11'-.( o/t,. V-f-h. (~P'"'",tI"U^-(.~ ;5 'Vf""" ",It-p.W)'P>(,
Men l(l^. I r
3 The uses wlthlr ~ C~~Ahislve I lmvelopment proJ t are o;pf,rw~se p~rmltted In t~e City of Clearwater
f\"lg~\:'''' ';"1 .... I;r. I"t.
C) f.tv1fV'~J..f';.
I(rLJ~;r~blt.
I'^
.
4
r 0 <-
-,h, lAl'~"tL ~ tAJ-..N\..JAi7' ~re>j t.J ",,;/1 V'~f.',y.,.,-"J-
~ V~t~ Cl,^, fI"Ov;-Jt. Ad4if,,,^ r tstA vrN"\J.. ,..AI (,-t..':;
6
evelopment as a comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project Will upgrade the Immediate VICInity
lhL .ck1:J~~ ~uLJLu.t!L{12r~ &. ~~rrt,.f- ~~~Ik
6Jrr""r4""1-~~~ ;.,.,.., -;:....dt~~ Jv~ 'tk fr-rseJ dt!.<y- ~v"dJ.''V. ~H.. ~
7 The deSign of the proposed comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
~ ~~-"J()ftv'(/\t ",,;ILh!Ac,Jlf. +k t.Vrfvf- r(.J~V( !of~I/.-t/..I-
&P ~ CArlA.
8
9
~ '{ ~
~
10 The deSign of all bUildings compiles WI~To~nst Dlstnct or Downtown Dlstnct deSign gUI~lnes In DIVIsion 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) Pf1l
Use separate sheets as necessary ~ U W ~ l r CGpvt,P Vi '? ~ ~
See. A 1t~f{f:l> l-
f ~ 6D fr;u, I 6~ I)~~
Page 3 of 7 - FleXible Development Application - ComprehenSive Intlll Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
E JUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL RE.REMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A) .
~GNED A~m SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One Original and 12 copies,
~TREE SURVEY (including eXisting trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent Site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed),
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY,
;b} PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to
~I the submittal of thiS application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be In
accordance With accepted traffiC en~ln~/9rr91~s Th,- hrJPl'Jil~f\ t!J.eA~UdYJII be used In determl~lng whether or not deViations to thE!
'\ yrl<l"' ,Ia"da"'..," appro,ed. (fJ1 Wl-/V 11 U L /-H/fVW(/ tJ;, J71=( (1tl7 tv ) pv "(4 C f(4s (IN ~
~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable, {JAJ S~ ~ .
P.RELlMINARY PLAT, as reqUired (Note BUilding permits Will not be Issued until eVidence of recording a final plat IS prOVided), C {N{)(j
f1.1f7 fA.}!
COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable,
F SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202 A)
o.lTE PLAN With the follOWing information (not to exceed 24" X 36")
All dimenSions,
~ North arrow,
~ Englneenng bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared,
_ Location map,
=v Index sheet referenCing indiVidual sheets Included In package,
Footpnnt and size of all EXISTING bUildings and structures,
_ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures,
All reqUired setbacks, ~ ?
All eXlstln and olnts of access, /
All re Ulred Sl ht tnan les ? 7 f) ~ ; .
I entlficatlon of envlronmenta Iy unique areas, suc as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
~trees, Including deSCription and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and Wildlife habitats, etc,
~ Location of all public and pnvate easements,
V / Localion of all street rights-of-way Within and adjacent to the Site,
_yV Location of eXIsting public and private utilities, Including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines,
_ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces,
:; / Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all reqUired parking lot Interior landscaped areas,
7v LocatIOn of all solid waste containers, recycling.or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical equipment and all required screenmg {per
Section 3-201 (0)(1) and Index #701}, L
LocatIon of all landscape matenal, ~ CoOIlA~'v.J CC/f'1
_ Location of all jUrisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands, ,1/2 0-.a.A// I/e"# .
C/~ Location of all onslte and off site storm-water management faCilities, free" '/r....l(~'-f~
=-:l Localion of all outdoor lighting fixtures, and
_ ' Location of all eXisting ancf proposed Sidewalks
o
SITE DATA TABLE for eXisting, required, and proposed development, In written/tabular form
Land area In square feet and acres,
"Number of EXISTING dwelling Units,
Number of PROPOSED dwelling umts, rf1
Gross floor area devoted to each use, ~ ')'fltJ b L>I
Parking spaces total number, presented In tabular form With the number of reqUired spaces,
Total paved area, Including all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed In square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area,
Size and species of all landscape material,
OffiCial records book and page numbers of all eXisting utility easement,
BUilding and structure heights,
Impermeable surface ratio I S R ,and
oor area ra 10 (F A R ) for all nonresidential uses
v
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) and color rendering If pOSSible
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, prOVIde the follOWing addltlonallnformalion on site plan
One-foot contours or spot elevations on Site,
Off site elevations If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel,
All open space areas
Localion of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms,
Lot lines and bUilding lines (dimensioned),
Streets and dnves (dimensioned),
BUilding and structural setbacks (dimensioned),
Structural overhangs,
Tree Inventory prepared by a "certified arborlst" of all trees B" DBH or greater reflecting Size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 _ FleXible Development Application - Comprehensive Inhll Redevelopment prOJect- City of Clearwater
.
G LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-1102 A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN
All eXisting and proposed structures,
Names of abutting streets,
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations,
Delineation and dimenSions of all reqUIred penmeter landscape buffers,
Sight vIsibility tnangles,
Delineation and dimenSions of all parking areas Including landscaping Islands and curbing,
Proposed and reqUired parking spaces,
EXisting trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the Site, by species, size and locations, Including dnpline (as Indicated on
requIred tree survey),
Location, Size, descnptlon, specifications and quantities of all eXisting and proposed landscape matenals, Including botanical and
common names,
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including Instructions, sOil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures,
Intenor landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Intenor landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and
percentage covered,
Conditions of a prevIous development approval (e g conditions Imposed by the Community Development Board),
I rngatlon notes
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendenng If pOSSible)
o IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUired for Level Two and Three applications)
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater Design Cntena Manual and
4-202 A 21)
o STORMW A TER PLAN including the following requirements
EXisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines,
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures,
All adjacent streets and mUnicipal storm systems,
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure,
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality,
Signature of Flonda registered ProfeSSional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval IS reqUired pnor to Issuance of City BUilding Permit), If applicable
o COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS. If applicable
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A 23)
ReqUired In the event the application Includes a development where design standards are In Issue (e g Tounst and Downtown Dlstncts) or as part
of a ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment PrOject or a Resldentlallnflll PrOject
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings including height dimenSions, colors and matenals
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS _ four Sides of bUilding with colors and matenals to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (black and white and color rendenng, If
pOSSible) as required
J SIGNAGE (DIVISion 19 SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached Signs, PrOVide photographs and dimenSions (area, height, etc ), Indicate whether they Will be removed or
to remain
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached Signs, PrOVide details Including location, Size, height, colors, matenals and drawing
o ComprehenSive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and lee reqUired)
o Reduced Slgnage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), If submitting ComprehenSive Sign Program application
Page 5017 _ Flexible Development Application ComprehenSive Inllll Redevelopment proJect- City of Clearwater
.
.
K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. (Section 4-202 A 13 and 4-a01.C)
o Include as reqUired If proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted In the Comprehensive Plan
Tnp generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Tnp General Manual Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this reqUIrement
L SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made In this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authOrize City representatives to VISit and photograph the property
descnbed In this application
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscnbed before me this _ day of
AD 20_ to me and/or by
, who IS personally known has
p~~~ ~
Identification
Notary public,
My commiSSion expires
Signature of property owner or representative
Page 6 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
.
.
M AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT.
(Names of all property owners)
1 That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following desCribed property (address or general location)
2 That thiS property constitutes the property for which a request for a (describe request)
3 That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitIOns or other documents necessary to affect such petitIOn,
3 That thiS affidaVit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, FlOrida to conSider and act on the above desCribed property,
4 That the applicant acknowledges that all Impact fees (parks and recreation, traffiC, etc ) Will be paid PRIOR to the Issuance of a bUilding permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first,
5 That site VISitS to the property are necessary by City representatIves In order to process thiS applicatIOn and the owner authOrizes City
representatives to VISit and photograph the property desCribed In thiS application,
6 That (I/we), the underSigned authOrity, hereby certify that the foregOing IS true and correct
Property Owner
Property Owner
ST A TE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the underSigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of FlOrida, on thiS day of
personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidaVit that he/she Signed
My CommiSSion Expires
Notary Public
S 'Plannmg DepartmentlAppllcatlon Formsldevelopment revlew\2003 FORMSlcomprehenslVe mflll applicatIOn 6-232003 doc
Page 7 of 7 _ FleXible Development Application - ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
~ If( ut I.c;j (l1J~1 '~J f)1/}) 1YlIr/ t-r/ tJ;/ tft1,
.~~
IZ/[6r6 I 8
~
f t1rv1 IS /AIPtJ I w ~ rif;;tte N7N fir-)-
C 4u$) or) { wn
tj
~ 1-, cltiaNo
~
fJ1JJI
~~
t-Copy
AYaHable
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2 37 PM
Simmons, Margie, Akin, Pam
Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina, Gerlock, Frank
RE use of parking payment In lieu funds for downtown
The Stat10n Square parkmg lot site is located ill the old Urban Center-Core 2 subchstnct Therefore, acc01chng to
Pam's review below that the Church of SCientology money can be used for the pubhc spaces ill the Beck project
Thanks
Cyndl T arapam
Planrung D1!ector
(727)562-4547
cynch taraparu@MyClearwater com
'y
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Simmons, Margie
Sent Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9 09 AM
To: Akin, Pam, Tarapanl, Cyndl
SubJect RE use of parking payment In lieu funds for downtown
Thanks Pam
Cyndl - IS Station Square In one of those old dlstncts?
-----Onglnal Message-----
From. Akin, Pam
Sent' Tuesday, December 02, 2003 4 52 PM
To' Simmons, Margie, Arasteh, Mahshld, Brumback, Garry
Ce' QUillen, Michael, Bruch, Tracey, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Stone, Ralph
SUbJect: use of parking payment In lieu funds for downtown
The Church of SCientology made a payment In lieu of parking for the SuperPower bUilding pursuant to the old
code 940 488(e) and Reso 94-57 The reso states as follows In 92 "Any use of the fees collected shall be
limited to parking Improvements In the Urban Center (Bayfront), Urban Center (Core) and Urban Center (Eastern
COrridor) zoning dlstncts, and the timing, type and location of said Improvements shall be at the exclUSive
discretion of the City of Clearwater Fees shall be limited to only those Improvements that add to the supply of
public parking In the applicable zoning dlstncts, not to maintenance costs associated With eXisting or newly
established public parking or to parking Improvements outside the applicable zoning dlstncts "
Assuming that Station Square IS In one of those old dlstncts (planning should have the map) then we can use the
payment for the public spaces In Station Square ProJect The Church paid $4,500 per space(as provided In
Reso 94-57) and "bought out" of 334 spaces
1
-~
-------
--
~ I 'L/ l({O?,
~
----
E. Supplemental SubmIttal Requirements
Parking Demand Study
Parkin Table
ResidentIal
Restaurant
RetaIl
TOTAL
*Providing 100 public
arkin s aces
Re mred
219
149
20
388
Pro osed
221
3*
2*
226*
The proposed development includes 100 publIc parking spaces.
DeviatIons from parking standards are relieved by the internal
capture of the project. The retail and restaurant spaces will have
significant walk-up traffic. The residents of the project wIll also
patronIZe these establishments. In additIOn, the public parking
spaces likely will be used for the retail and restaurant spaces.
'-
~FVO~ wLL~ ~
-- hIL~f6
~~~
~1Z-
\
\
\
\
.,-------
~
WOLA--U
Best C()py
Available
.---------
\'V\~_I~ W(U-~~
II
~f\(7.~ --r_-~lW"\ ~u~LIY\,rl,~ ---to~ ~W f:W-~D .~,~ - - -
"G~ '9 i: VA '''fI ,.... ~ -+v.R~----
~ '" }))U,l -b dE ~~ ,'____ .., , ___,
_ _ _ _ A1N ^ DflrlW'u)rJJ0( " _ .
! ~ 'Jv Gd ~ ~(~ ~I\ fV\ (Jvt---'-:-~ _ - ---
r ()o~ newt ~ tJ-o ~[\J'Z.- \rJt liii/U- v~. ._
,': ~tI- ~ -f0! rnI+ ~ 8f! WJL i) . --- --- --
I:' - tQ~ nia- -b o#(LQ,3 ~t- r:r~ _On _
I: ~~ :oLt7hrYl ~ f/JjC/l ~ ~ ~--
I:. lOW ~ f; dfJ LJcuJ{.f- u~(j(([)/i'1.L ----
II
1~~L:~ ~ -to bi oJdfeg~ {Xi(y~1o- ~~~~~_-_
~: ~~ ~ t--~2}ci ,,- - --,-
- I tM ~ -- -&' ~o___ -----
- . il PO\:)J\G ~ o.~~~~_,~?f~ fWcri ___~___ _ _ -~____
- ~j:p~~ (Vz- "-~ ~~fo ~ ~~~~
~ ~~ _oJJr-d~ u-- QJ A(jr~. ---- G--------
.< ~-Wb & ~ {~--:~tf.J --- ~kM -V/lkJJ
~! -. WYtt.-Jf-- .iI fJ2- ~'ffI 4M.f1.ftfyP!--(eLrrv...- ,
,.. __ I:j~ I ~ . .- -- ----- _ -. 'n'__ '---- _. .
. :_ _-~ . _ -t I . _' ~_ ~: ., .': ~ ~'. _ _', =_ .~8~:= __ :.':_- '.' _~_____
I
I
-- - --.......- -_ ......-..- J ~ _ ~____ - -=-_..,.. 0- - - ~__ ____...... _ ..... _... __..,.__,..- .._LL___._____ .
I
il
-..------ ~--I~1 --=---- . -._~u___.. ~-
\- ~ ~ ---- ~ ~ I:t' - ~~---- - T - - ~ ~-~~-- -- -------.. - -- -.-- - -
-- "-----.~--f" - -_._--~- -~~- - ---- - - - -~-~ -~ - --
\....----~~ ---1fi dT__~ --- ~-- ~-- -~ -- ----- - - ---- -- --
I I
--------
_~~r r;D~~28 Cleveland Street
~wner/Applicant CRA, Tone 40, Ltd /StatIOn Square, LLC
--------~. Representative' Bnan Murphy, Beck Development, LLC (5100 West Kennedy Boulevard, SUlte 251,
'.~
Tampa, FL 33609, phone 813-387-5336, fax 813-288-0188, cell 813-918-2305, emaIl
bnanmurohv@beckgroup com)
Location 0 97 acres located on the north side of Cleveland Street, approxunately 500 feet west of North
Myrtle Avenue
Atlas Page: 286B
Zonmg' D, Downtown Dlstnct
Request: FleXible Development approval to penmt a mixed-use development and a bUlldm'g Wlthm the
requrred sight vlslblhty tnangles, a reduction of the requrred number of parkmg spaces from 388 spaces to
226 spaces, an mcrease of the penmtted height from 30 feet to 158 feet and an mcrease of the penmtted
denSity from 61 dwellmg umts to 146 dwelhng urlIt!l by usmg 85 dwellmg umts from the Clearwater
Downtown Redevelopment Plan area denSity pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under
the provlSlons of Section 2-903 C and a Comprehensive Landscape Program to elunmate the requrrement to
prOVide foundatIOn plantmgs, under the prOVlSlons of Section 3-1202 G
Proposed Use The proposal mcludes a mixed-use development with 146 attached dwellings, 5,096
square feet of retail sales and serVIce and 9,904 square feet of restaurant within a buIld!ng 158 feet m
height
Neighborhood ASSOCiations: None
Presenter Mark T Parry, Planner
Attendees mcluded,
City Staff (tentative): Frank Gerlock (plannmg), Bryan Berry (plannmg), Scott R1ce (engmeenng - traffic,
general engmeenng and stormwater), Tom Glenn (sohd waste), Duanne Anderson (fire), Arden Dittmer
(landscapmg), R1ck Albee (land resources) and Mark Parry (plannmg/presenter) ,
Apphcant/RepresentatIve (tentative) Bnan Murphy
.
.
The DRC reVIewed this apphcatIon With the foUowmg comments,
1. Parks and Recreation'
a) Exempt from Open Space/Recreation Impact Fees smce located m the downtown redevelopment
area
2, Stormwater,
a) Payment m heu must be received pnor to BuIldmg Penmt
b) The followmg Items must be addressed pnor to BUlldmg Penmt
~ Show where water quahty Wlll be provided
~ SWFWMD permit or letter of exemptIOn
~ Water quahty storage must recover Wlthm 24 hours
3. Traffic Enl!ineerml!'
a) Site plan must mclude dunensIOns for dnve aisles Show current City standard regular parkmg
stall, handicapped parkmg stall, handicapped fme sign, and dnve aisles
b) WIll tlus be gated? If so show location of the console Also there must be enough room for
stackmg oftbree cars on the property Velucles must not obstruct Laura Street
c) Show vertical clearance for parkmg garage
d) PrOVide Sidewalk along Laura Street,
e) Handicap parkmg aisles must be free of ObstructIOns Columns are shown m the aisles for spaces
42 and 43 on Level #2 (Sheet#A-l 2)
f) All of the above to be addressed pnor to CDB
g) Traffic Impact Fees to be determmed and paid pnor to C 0
4. General Enl!meerml!
a) Clanfy how Wlllloadmg and offloadmg of dehvenes be addressed?
b) Clanfy how the pubhc parkmg spaces wIll be controlled and reserved for the general pubhc?
How wIll reSidents be kept out of tlus area?
5, Plannml!' The followmg Items to be addressed pnor to CDB review
a) Confirm the number of proposed dwellmg umts The apphcations hsts 146 umts where the site
plan data table hsts 145 umts,
b) PrOVide all math confirmmg that thiS project reqUlres 85 dwellmg umts from the denSity pool,
\
\
Development ReView Committee Action Agenda - Thursday, December 4, 2003 - Page 8
~
~-------
c) ProvIde th JSS floor area of the bUlldmg The data table _iifigure l1L __
that IS the gross floor area label as such,
d) ProvIde the square footage of the footpnnt,
) Adjust your dat<<table to reflect accurate parkmg requrrements as follows
,f) 9,904 square feet of restaurant at 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GF A = 149 requrred spaces
not 157 spaces, .
g) 5,096 square feet of retall sales and sefVlce at four spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA = 20
requrred spaces not 18 spaces,
h) Total = 219 spaces (based on 146 dwellmg uruts) + 149 spaces + 20 spaces = 388 spaces
re urred e;-J
ProvIde the eXIstmg number of parkmg spaces,
Clanfy the SIze of the sIte 0 97 ac~s equals 42,253 square feet n 42,365 s are feet as hsted on
the apphcatIOn and SIte plan, L [412,. ().i)t'fL,)
k) It IS not clear what the parkmg demand study shows - tlus needs to be clanfied In other words
outlme more fully the concept of "mtemal capture",
I) IndIcate all outdoor hghtmg fixtures on the SIte plan,
m) IndIcate the SIdewalk on the north SIde of the SIte along Laura Street,
n) ProvIde eXIstmg FAR,
u) flu v.dc. GAlstmg ISR;-
p) Accurately portray the SIght vlSlbIhty tnangles along the property Ime,
q) Clanfy/confirm that all proposed sIgnage (or at least the space m wluch they WIll be located) has
been accurately portrayed (mdIcate dImenSIOns), and
r) IndIcate bUllt-m planters along the outsIde of the parkmg garage levels to further soften the
extenor of the bulldmg (see landscape comment for full detalls) All velucles need to be screened
from VIew and the cables are not suffiCIent nor do they meet the mtent of the Downtown Plan or
the DeSIgn GUldelmes (currently under development) Ifplanters are not possIble then decorative
gnll may be acceptable,
IndIcate landscapmg along the east SIde of the bUlldmg (see landscape comment for full detalls),
PrOVIde the number of seats to be mcluded m the outdoor seatmg area,
It appears that columns are m the handIcap aIsles - tills IS not pernutted so the handIcap spaces
WIll need to be eIther relocated or redeSIgned,
v) ProvIde the antiCIpated pncmg of the varIOUS types of uruts avallable,
w) Clanfy that the project IS meetmg all bulldmg codes WIth regards to requrred percentage of open
space for the parkmg garage (for ventilation),
x) Clanfy who or what "CRA" IS as hsted on the apphcatIon (Commuruty Redevelopment Agency?),
y) PrOVIde bulldmg matenal samples or at least photos (mclude pamt clups of all colors to be used),
z) How are the restaurant and retall spaces accessed from the Cleveland Street?, and
aa) How many Jobs w1l1 be generated by the proposal?
6. SolId Waste:
a) There WIll not be enough room to servIce compactor - shorten the traffic dIVIder m front to gIve a
straight shot at the compactor
Land Resources.
a) Show all trees on and WIthm 25' of the property on all plans pnor to CDB
8. FIre'
a)
tff.
J f\ ~ s)
\1)U ". t)
u)
7
Ensure that the codes used for tills project reflect adherence WIth the followmg before BCP
permIttmg
- 2001 Flonda BUlldmg Code
- 2001 Flonda BUlldmg Code - Mecharucal
- 2001 Flonda BUlldmg Code - Plumbmg
- 2001 Flonda BUlldmg Code - Fuel Gas Code
- 2001 Flonda Frre Prevention Code
- NatIOnal Electnc Code 1999 (NFPA 70)
-CIty of Clearwater Commuruty Development Code, amended 2000, ordmance # 6526-00
b) Ensure adherence WIth Chapter 11 8 (lugh-nse bUlldmgs) of NFPA 101 LIfe Safety Code 2000
EdItion,
c) Ensure that that the frre alarm system IS mstalled m accordance WIth NFPA 72 1999 edItIOn, and
eqUlpped WIth pre-recorded VOIce evacuatIOn,
Development ReVIew Connmttee ActIOn Agenda - Thursday, December 4, 2003 - Page 9
J ------y
..
.
,
~
".
d) Ensure hood 1S J.llstalled, m accordance W1th NFP A 96, by a Ill. ~d mecharucal contractor under
separate perm1t w1th shop drawmgs,
e) Hood suppresslOn system to be mstalled as per NFPA-17a, by a hcensed hood suppresslOn
contractor Wlth a separate pernut and shop drawmgs,
f) Hood suppresslOn system shall be mterfaced Wlth bUlldmg fire alarm system so that when hood
suppreSSlOn system :lctIvates the bUlldmg's fire alarm system also actIvates,
g) F1re department connectlOn needs to be located at mmUllum of 15 feet away from the bUlldmg
w1thm 40 feet of the fire hydrant,
h) F1re department connectlOns shall be 1dentIfied by a slgn that states "no parkmg, fire department
connectIon" and shall be des1gned m accordance Wlth Flonda Department of TransportatIon
standards for mformatlOn slgnage,
1) Frre protectlOn apphances (frre department connectlOn (fdc) shall mamtam a clearance of7 and 1/2
, feet m front and to the sldes of apphance,
J) Clearances of 71/2' ft m front of and to the sldes of the fire hydrant, Wlth a 4' ft clearance to the
rear of the hydrant are requrred,
k) Temporary fdc connected to dry standp1pe must be mstalled pnor to bUlldmg reachmg 50 ft m
he1ght (for bUlldmgs under constructIon), and
1) Frre spnnkler system 1S to be mstalled m accordance W1th NFPA 13 1999 ed1tIon Frre spnnkler
system to be mstalled by hcensed frre spnnkler contractor under separate pernut Wlth shop
drawmgs Frre spnnkler documents that contam 50 or more spnnkler heads shall be slgned and
sealed by a professlOnal engmeer as per 471 025 Flonda statutes
9. Env1ronmental
a) No Comments
10. Community Response:
a) No comments as of November 17,2003
11. LandscaplDl!:
a) ImgatIon must meet the C1ty Code per SectIon 3-1203 C , adjust plans to show 100% coverage,
ram sensor, automatIc t1mer, etc ,
b) Area to the east of the bUlldmg may have plantmgs mstalled smce there 1S approx1mately the same
area as the one md1cated on the west slde of the bUlldmg, and
c) Recommend puttmg planters mstead of cables at parkmg levels Wlth a cascadmg plant matenal
(1 e Protasparagus dens1florus {asparagus spnngen fern}, Mandev1l1a x amoena 'Allce du Pont', or
Hedera hehx) Sometlung that w1l1 add color and texture to the parkmg areas wlll enhance the curb
appeal of the bUlldmg
NOTES'
1 In order to be placed on the January 20, 2004 CDB agenda (prov1ded that a second DRC meetmg 1S not
requrred, see note #2 below), 15 sets of the rev1sed subIll1ttal package must be subIll1tted to Staff on or before
noon on December 11, 2003 Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropnate SUbIll1SSlOns not
appropnately orgaruzed shall be deemed to be msuffic1ent and returned to the apphcant
2 These comments are bemg sent to the apphcant's representatIve, Bnan Murphy on Monday, November 17,2003
(13 days m advance of the DRC meetmg) at approxunately 1000 a m for the apphcant's convemence
Add1tIonal comments may be generated at the DRC meetmg on Thursday, December 4, 2003 In add1tIon,
should slgmficant changes to the proposal be requrred to be made by the apphcant the apphcatlOn may be
subsequently be reqUlred to be rev1ewed at a second DRC meetmg pnor to bemg rev1ewed by the CDB
DRAFT DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS
1 That all slgnage meet the reqUlrements of Code and be arch1tecturally-mtegrated W1th the des1gn of the bUlldmg
W1th regards to color, matenals and fimsh,
2 That no freestandmg slgns of any kmd be pernutted on the slte,
3 That a final slgn package be submltted to and approved by Staff pnor to the 1ssuance of any pernuts Wh1Ch
shows
a) All slgns fully d1menslOned and coordmated m terms of mcludmg the same color and font style and Slze,
and
b) That all slgns be constructed of the lughest quahty matenals Wh1Ch are coordmated Wlth the colors,
matenals and arch1tectural style of the bUlldmg,
4 That slgnage be lunlted to slgns on the canop1es OR attached d1rectly to the bUlldmg,
Development Rev1ew Comm1ttee ActIon Agenda - Thursday, December 4, 2003 - Page 10
5 That all vehicles be comi Y screened from view from all sides of the su'-. vt site,
6 That the funuture used for the outdoor seatmg component of the restaurant w1l1 be of the highest quahty and that
no slgnage of any kmd w1l1 be mcluded on any portlOn of the furniture mcludmg but not lllTIlted to the charrs,
tables, planters and/or umbrellas,
7 That a TransportatIon Impact Fee be paid pnor to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
8 That all Fire Department reqUlrements be met pnor to the Issuance of any permits,
9 That payment m heu of stormwater fac1l1tIes by paid pnor to the Issuance of any penmts,
10 That a final landscape wluch matches and complements the landscapmg proposed for the StatIon Square Park
redevelopment the Streetscapmg Plan be submttted to and approved by Staff pnor to the Issuance of any
penmts,
11 That retall uses be 11lmted to
a) Retall estabhshments that sell or lease goods directly to the consumer (1 e book store, gift shops, antIque
store, flonst, clothmg store, Video store, etc ),
b) Art Gallenes, .
c) Gourmet grocery stores With accessory sales of alcohohc beverages The gourmet grocery store may also
mclude prepared food for off-Site consumptlOn,
d) Restaurants Wlth accessory sales of alcohohc beverages, and
e) Sidewalk cafes as accessory to the pnnclpal retall uses
12 That the followmg uses be prolublted
a) All uses prohibited by the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan,
b) All other retall uses not speCifically IdentIfied above, pursuant to the Commumty Development Code's
defirutlOn of retall sales and service,
c) NlghtclublBar,
d) Alcohohc Beverage Package Store,
e) Medical or Vetennary offices, and
f) Any other use detenmned by the Commuruty Development Coordmator not to share the charactenstIcs of
"allowable retall uses"
13 That the developer shall actIvely market and use lus/her best efforts to obtam tenants for the frrst floor retall
space as one or more of the allowable retall uses descnbed above,
14 That should the developer be unable to obtam an allowable retall use as descnbed above Wlthm one year of
Issuance of the temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the retall space, the City may allow, upon wntten request
of the developer, one of more of the followmg alternate uses to occupy the first floor retall space of the bUlldmg
a) Tallor/seamstress,
b) Dry cleaners,
c) FmanclalInstItutlOn,
d) Busmess office other than medical or vetermary office, and
e) Personal services
15 That whenever an alternate use tenant vacates the retall space, the developer or deSignee shall use lus/her best
efforts to re-estabhsh the retall space With an allowable use as defmed m conditIon number 10 above, and
16 That constructlOn be commenced wlthm one year of c10smg
LUNCH
Development ReView Committee ActIon Agenda - Thursday, December 4, 2003 - Page 11
...
r
,
)
J
Page 1 of 2
'~
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent.
To.
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Wednesday, November 12, 2003354 PM
Haines, Angel, Fierce, Lisa, Gerlock, Frank
FW Commission Request
Angel-forgot to mclude you so you know lt was sent
Llsa and Cmp-sent to you FYI
Cyndl T arapam
Planrung Dltector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3 53 PM
To: Wilson, Denrse A, Owens, Reginald W.
Cc: Akin, Pam, Clayton, Gina
Subject: RE Commission Request
The Stanon Square Square Project-Beck Development lS proceedmg assurrung that the County will approve
the Downtown Plan m early February, 2004 The Downtown Plan must be approved for Beck to proceed
and the Beck project must be conslstent Wlth the Plan, wmch lt lS Beck has known all along of the
srmultaneous reVlew of the Downtown Plan and thelt project and agreed to take the rlsk, although shght,
that the Plan 1111ght not be approved by the County
Although lt would have been helpful to have the deslgn gw.dehnes 111 place pnor to new proJects, the Clty
has agreed to conslder projects pnor to completlon of the gmdehnes so that potentlal projects are not lost to
other compet:l11g locatlons In revleW111g the Beck proposal, the Clty staff used as gmdance the eXlst:l11g
gmdehnes, reVlewed other cWes' gmdehnes and then evaluated altematlve deslgns wlth the developer to
ach1eve a deslgn solutlon that worh for both the Clty and the developer
The zon111g code amendments related to the Downtown Plan are not reqUlted to be complete prlor
to revlewmg new proJects The proposed use of resldentlal, restaurant and retail uses by the Beck developer
are allowed 111 both the Downtown Plan as well as the current zon111g regulatlons so there lS no amendment
to the zorung regulatlons that lS reqUlted to allow th1s proJect to go forward The Clty has deter1111ned that lt
will not refuse to conslder vlable projects durmg the pendency of the gw.dehnes and code regulatlons The
Clty lS further protected S111ce the Plan supercedes any zorung regulatlons wh1ch are not conslstent wlth lt
and the Clty'S reVlew will ensure that all projects will be conslstent wlth the Downtown Plan
The Beck project will be revlewed as a Comprehenslve Infill Project Wlth the CDB revlewmg the slte plan
and the request for use of the denslty pool The Plan contemplates that reVlew of projects usmg the denslty
pool will be done by the CDB so the process for Beck lS conslstent wlth the Plan The CRA will reVlew and
approve the Development Agreement Wlth the developer, WhlCh revlew will occur after the CDB reVlew
I hope th1s mformatlon lS helpful
12/1/2003
Page 2 of 2
.
~ I
.. '
Cyndl Tarapam
Planrung D1!ector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
-----Ongmal Message---n
From: Wilson, Denise A
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9 39 AM
To: Owens, Reginald W , Tarapanl, Cyndl
Subject: CommisSion Request
Importance: High
Bill received a request from a ComnusslOner regarchng Station Square Project The ComnusslOner's
question was 'How does the Station Square project move forward m the absence of Deslgn
Gwdelmes and Wlthout the updated zorung regulations;>
Please provlde me your response no later than Wednesday afternoon, November 19th
Thanks
Deruse
12/1/2003
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent.
To
Cc
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2 37 PM
Parry, Mark
Gerlock, Frank, Fierce, Lisa
Transportation Impact fee calculation on Beck
In rev1ewmg the transportation rmpact fee calculations prepared by Bennett Elbo, I has some questions I would
apprec1ate 1f you would evaluate 1t wIth hun and check tlus out
1 On the Traffic rmpact fee assessment worksheet prepared by Bennett, he shows the eXisting use as
restaurant for the 1st and 2nd floors There 1S clearly not a restaurant there now nor do I remember a restaurant
smce I have been employed here Question 1S what 1S the source of tlus mformation and 1S tlus restauant use
correct;l Also, what 1S the source generally for rmpact fees, 1t seems 1t should be current occupational hcense, unless
the ordmance states otherw1se
2 Also, on the same worksheet, 1t shows the eXisting bmldmg as 3 stor1es-1 thought 1t was only 2 Please
confirm
3 On the second page of the overall Impact and Perrmt Fees worksheet prepared by ED, the deta1led
estlmates for the transportation fees, show only 4840 plus 4600 as the total non-res1dential square footage Tills
should be a total of 15,000 sf to match the subrmtted s1te plan I thmk tlus 1S only a typo smce the nght amount of
fee 1S shown from the assessment prepared by Bennett
Any questions, please call Thanks
Cynd1 Tarapam
Planrnng Dlrector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
~"-
1
..
j)a-IWb J1Ja'17It:V;
~ani, Cyndi
From:
Sent.
To:
Cc
Subject:
Parry, Mark
Monday, November 17,2003956 AM
'bnanmurphy@beckgroup com'
Gerlock, Frank, Fierce, Lisa, Tarapam, Cyndl
FLD2003-10056 - 628 Cleveland Street - DRC comments
Brian,
Please find the DRC comments as of this morn 109 below. I don't thmk we'll get too many more but that's always a pOSSibility.
Anyway, I figured that these are probably the bulk of the comments and I wanted you to get them as early as pOSSible so you
could adequately prepare for the DRC meeting on the 4th of December as I figured you'd probably be off a couple of days
next week for ThanksgIVIng. Please make sure you don't miss the two notes at the bottom ofthe list which outline the time
frame for resubmittal for CDS and the caveat that the DRC must deem the application sufficient in order to go on to the next
step, that bemg the CDB meetmg of January 20, 2004. While I expect the applicatIOn to move ahead smoothly please be
aware that gomg to the DRC does not automatically mean that an application will go ahead to the next step (the CDB
meetmg).
Any concerns or questions? Just drop me a line or gIVe me a rmg, If I don't see or hear from you in the mean time have a
great ThanksglVmg and I'll see you 10 December.
Smcerely,
Mark T Parry
Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
727 562 4558
mparry@clearwater-fl com
10:10 a m.
Case: FLD2003-10056 - 628 Cleveland Street
Owner/Applicant CRA, Tone 40, Ltd /StatIon Square, LLC
Representative: Bnan Murphy, Beck Development, LLC (5100 West Kennedy Boulevard, SUIte 251, Tampa, FL 33609,
phone 813 387 5336, fax 8132880188, cell 813 9182305, emall bnanmurohv@beckgroup com
<matlto bnanmurphv@beckgroup com>)
LocatIOn: 097 acres located on the north SIde of Cleveland Street, approxunately 500 feet west of North Myrtle Avenue
Atlas Page: 286B
Zonmg: D, Downtown DIStrIct
Request: FleXIble Development approval to permIt a bUIldIng WIthIn the reqUIred SIght VISIbIlIty trIangles, reduce the
reqUIred number of parkIng spaces from 388 spaces to 226 spaces, Increase the permItted heIght from 30 feet to 158 feet and
mcrease the permItted denSity from 61 dwellIng umts to 146 dwellIng umts by usmg 85 dwellmg umts from the Downtown
Plan area denSIty pool, as a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under the prOVISIons of SectIOn 2-903 C
Proposed Use: The proposalmcludes a mixed-use development With 146 attached dwellings, 5,096 square feet of
retail sales and service and 9,904 square feet of restaurant within a buddmg 158 feet in heIght.
Neighborhood AsSOCiations: None
Presenter: Mark T Parry, Planner
Attendees mcluded:
City Staff (tentatlve):...Frank Gerlock (plannmg), Bryan Berry (planmng), Scott RIce (engmeermg - traffic, general
engmeermg and stormwater), Tom Glenn (solId waste), Duanne Anderson (fire), Arden DIttmer (landscapIng), RIck Albee
(land resources) and Mark Parry (planmng/presenter)
Applicant/Representative (tentative):...Bnan Murphy
The DRC reViewed thiS application With the followinl! comments:
1. Parks and RecreatIOn:
a) Exempt from Open Space/RecreatIon Impact Fees SInce located m the downtown redevelopment area
2. Stormwater.
a) The follOWIng Items must be addressed pnor to bUIldIng permIt
1
~w where water ~'IllI1~ WIll he p~ ;
~ Payment 10 lIeu must be receIved prIor to Buddmg Pennlt
~ SWFWMD pennlt or letter of exemptIOn
~ Water qualIty storage must recover Wlthm 24 hours
3. Traffic Enemeerme
a) SIte plan must mclude dimensIOns for drIve aisles Show current CIty standard regular parkmg stall, handIcapped
parkmg stall, handIcapped fine Sign, and drIve aIsles
b) Will thiS be gated? If so show locatIon of the console Also there must be enough room for stackmg of three cars
on the property VehIcles must not obstruct Laura Street
c) Show vertIcal clearance for parkmg garage
d) PrOVIde SIdewalk along Laura Street
e) All of the above to be addressed pnor to CDB
f) Traffic Impact Fees to be detennmed and paId prIor to CO
4. General EnelDeerine:
a) ClarIfy how Wlllloadmg and offloadmg of dehverles be addressed?
b) Clarify how the pubhc parkmg spaces WIll be controlled and reserved for the general pubhc? How WIll reSidents be
kept out ofthls area?
5. Planmne: The followmg Items to be addressed prIor to CDB revIew
g) Confirm the number of proposed dwelhng umts The apphcatIons hsts 146 umts where the sIte plan data table
hsts 145 umts,
h) PrOVIde all math confirmmg that thIS project reqUIres 84 dwellmg umts from the denSity pool,
I) PrOVIde the gross floor area of the buddmg The data table has a figure of34,090 square feet If that IS the gross
floor area label as such,
j) PrOVIde the square footage of the footprInt,
k) Adjust your date table to reflect accurate parkmg reqUIrements as follows
~ 9,904 square feet of restaurant at 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet ofGFA = 149 reqUIred spaces not 157
. J ~ ( spaces,
~fl~ lUW'b" l.~ 5,096 square feet of retaIl sales and service at four spaces per 1,000 square feet ofGFA = 20 reqUIred
r . )'J.-f spaces not 18 spaces,
jU/' ~ Total = 219 spaces (based on 146 dwellIng umts) + 149 spaces + 20 spaces = 388 spaces reqUIred
A J"'flY\ I) PrOVIde the eXlstmg number ofparkmg spaces,
lV"' m) Clarify the sIze of the sIte 097 acres equals 42,253 square feet not 42,365 square feet as hsted on the apphcatIon
f4
u11dfd) adAJ,? I~~
1
.
,
n) It IS not clear what the parkmg demand study shows thIS needs to be clarIfied In other words outhne more fully
the concept 0 10 ern ,
0) IndIcate all outdoor hghtmg fixtures on the sIte plan,
p) IndIcate the Sidewalk on the north SIde of the sIte along Laura Street,
q) PrOVIde eXlstmg FAR,
r) PrOVIde eXlstmg ISR,
s) Accurately portray the SIght V1slblhty trIangles along the property lIne,
t) ClarIfy/confirm that all proposed slgnage (or at least the space 10 whIch they WIll be located) has been accurately
n portrayed (mdlcate dImenSIOns), and
~ IndIcate budt-m planters along the outsIde of the parkmg garage levels to further soften the exterIOr of the bUlldmg
(see landscape comment for full detaIls),
A Indicate landscapmg along the east SIde of the bUlldmg (see landscape comment for full detads), and
CfJ PrOVIde bUlldmg matenal samples or at least photos (mclude pamt chIps of all colors to be used)
6. Solid Waste
a) There WIll not be enough room to servIce compactor - shorten the traffic dIVIder m front to gIve a straIght shot at
the compactor
esources:
how all trees on and Wlthm 25' of the property on all plans prIor to CDB
7. Lan
a
8. Fire:
b)
Ensure that the codes used for thIS project reflect adherence WIth the follOWIng before BCP permlttmg
- 200 I Flonda BUlldmg Code
- 2001 Flonda BUlldmg Code - MechanIcal
- 2001 Flonda BUlldmg Code - Plumbmg
- 200 I Flonda Buddmg Code - Fuel Gas Code
- 2001 Flonda FIre PreventIOn Code
- NatIOnal ElectriC Code 1999 (NFP A 70)
-CIty of Clearwater Commumty Development Code, amended 2000, ordmance # 6526-00
c) Ensure adherence WIth Chapter 11 8 (hIgh-rISe buddmgs) ofNFPA 101 LIfe Safety Code 2000 EditIon,
2
t.
d) Ensure that that the fire alarm system IS mstalled m accordance WIth NFh. /2 1999 edItIon, and eqUIpped WIth
I
pre-recorded vOIce evacuatIon, i
e) Ensure hood IS mstalled, m accordance WIth NFPA 96, by a lIcensed mechanIcal contractor under separate ~enmt
WIth shop draWIngs,
f) Hood suppressIon system to be mstalled as per NFP A-17a, by a lIcensed hood suppressIon contractor WIth a
separate permIt and shop draWIngs,
g) Hood suppressIon system shall be mterfaced WIth buIldmg fire alarm system so that when hood suppressIon
system actIvates the bUlldmg's fire alarm system also actIvates, I
h) FIre department connectIon needs to be located at mmlmum of 15 feet away from the buIldIng Wlthm 40 feet of the
~~~ I
I) FIre department connectIons shall be IdentIfied by a SIgn that states "no parkmg, fire department connectIOn"
I
and shall be deSIgned m accordance WIth Flonda Department of TransportatIOn standards for mformatlOn
slgnage, I
J) FIre protectIon applIances (fire department connectIOn (fdc) shall mamtam a clearance 00 and 1/2' feet m front
and to the SIdes of applIance,
k) Clearances of 71/2' ft m front of and to the SIdes of the fire hydrant, WIth a 4' ft clearance to the rear of the
hydrant are requITed, ,
l) Temporary fdc connected to dry standpIpe must be mstalled pnor to buIldIng reachmg 50 ft m heIght (for
buIldmgs under constructIOn), and
m) FIre spnnkler system IS to be mstalled m accordance WIth NFPA 13 1999 edItIon FIre spnnkler system to:be
mstalled by lIcensed fire spnnkler contractor under separate permIt WIth shop draWIngs FIre sprInkler I
documents that contam 50 or more sprmkler heads shall be SIgned and sealed by a profeSSIonal engmeer as per
471 025 Flonda statutes II
9. EnVironmental:
a) No Comments :
10. Community Response:
a) No comments as of November 17,2003
11. LandscaplD2'
b) lITIgatIon must meet the CIty Code per SectIOn 3-1203 C , adjust plans to show 100% coverage, ram sensor, :
automatIc tImer, etc , I
CJ> Area to the east of the bUlldmg may have plantmgs mstalled smce there IS approXImately the same area as the one
mdlcated on the west SIde of the bUlldmg, and
~ Recommend puttmg planters mstead of cables at parkIng levels WIth a cascadmg plant materIal (I e Protasparagus
densIflorus {asparagus sprmgen fern}, MandeVIlla X amoena 'AlIce du Pont', or Hedera helIx) Somethmg that WIll
add color and texture to the parkmg areas WIll enhance the curb appeal of the bUlldmg !
'1
.
'1
NOTES:
I In order to be placed on the January 20, 2004 CDB agenda (proVIded that a second DRC meetmg IS not reqUIred, see note #2
below), 15 sets of the reVIsed submIttal package must be submItted to Staff on or before December 11, 2003 at 4 30 P m Packets
shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropnate SubmISSIOns not appropnately organIzed shall be deemed to be msuffiCIent
and returned to the applIcant
2 These comments are bemg sent to the applIcant's representatIve, Bnan Murphy on Monday, November 17,2003 (13 days m
advance of the DRC meetmg) at approxImately 10 00 a m for the applIcant's convenIence AddItIonal comments may be ,
generated at the DRC meetmg on Thursday, December 4, 2003 In addItIon, should SIgnIficant changes to the proposal be requIred
to be made by the applIcant the applIcatIon may be subsequently be requITed to be reVIewed at a second DRC meetmg pnor to bemg
revIewed by the CDB
3
I ,-~~
~4 i J ~ ~ ~CttrJAl-~i1
_____ mr tel/; ~f&!1 /Jlff;miP!l22/-/?jcPudlht/fl/J1~~
._~T~:L~l~/t6ffi'~at ....-.
_1lh.k. _~/~55dI.-~k#6M717~.__~-......
------ -- ------ ~-----------------------
____/m_ ~___________-- m__
;It} 47/t't ~_~t1~__ ----..~~-
-----/Llf- _ ~a/:hJxe ~~/nl:l~ ----------- --
____~ ~____ _&{j--~~~~ ac:~ ---------------
~,P- /~~~-==-~/~_
------- - Ift'J - -
..~#fJ.==fi~;!3 /1;tfIdEW7?~ ~ IV ~4--r.-.
_ _________ "32:J?RldJtt~;PJ~ -- ~ - -
____ _~ ,_~_?Jpi~M ~V)~____plJ27-~~.{/)~--_
--------- -- ---~ -----
~~_:~~~~~-=
. _.._ ._...11llLl--~ ~~Jz;r /2-~~-d'j).L - .... -
. ..:'i:. i.7t!t1~::-~~~jJ1~..ft;v--f1E..- -'" ..
.. . ___ ,_.IX. tlh~$l~:::'~ ?!}.r:J?. - ')- --- -
. _ . .'.__ __b!z;~Y--------'/-~;W:l}Z/? $-J2--4;!....L/;J .~_.-...
-- -------- .....---- --- -------- ------ ~ - - -------------~~------------ ----------- ------~-- ----- - -
~.=.~ ~b2::.-~f ~fF~~~ - --- .....-
, 111
- - - - - tr . - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - ----
/O!.bO ~1:- /fJlJJ -~ ./~- / "'nc~,
1. 3i:j() -v1 ~ Ava au.
,1
-r~
"
\'
I
id
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent
To
SubJect.
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, November 18, 2003 3 03 PM
Fierce, Lisa, Gerlock, Frank, Parry, Mark
Beck site plan Issues
FYI -and let me know If any rmpacts to sIte plan, thanks
Cyndl Tarapam
Planrung Dltector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
-----Onglnal Messagenm
From' Owens, Reginald W
Sent. Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1 25 PM
To' 'nlCkpavonette@beckgroup com'
Cc. Harnger, Sandy, Campos, Geraldine, Arasteh, Mahshld, Akin, Pam, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Simmons, Margie, Wilson, Denise A , Phillips,
Sue, Matthews, Douglas E
Subject. Post Office
Nlck/Bnan
I had a meeting with the Manager of the downtown Post Office and we reviewed your drawings and site plan
The Manager Thomas Legare (727) 441-3693 (United States Postal Service, 650 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33755)
seems very willing to cooperate In terms of moving some of his marl vans now lYing adjacent to the east boundary line of
the project site when you commence construction It seems he could relocate some of his on-site employee parking off-
site, and use these spaces for the vans (he needs a formal request letter from Beck)
However, he will need some help from Beck to achieve this - namely, my suggestion IS that Beck contact the Bank of
Amenca In downtown, and see IS they would be open to allowing temporary Post Office staff parking on that portion of their
dnve In facility which they do not currently use
Secondly, In light of the fact that It IS your desire to have Post Office traffic, those who use the parking structure, to eXit
through the garage and go by the retail, we are effectively creating a dead space In the adJoining space between the two
bUildings The Post Office IS 0 K with thiS, but agree with our position that Beck should assume the responsibility of
landscaping this future "dead" space This IS gOing to be a very deep dead end alley - our suggestion IS that you make this
alley part of your current site plan, and make provIsions for a combination hardscape/landscape plaza (extension of our
streetscape), which would extend to a decorative wall "half-way down the alley - the balance of the alley (north) could then
Just extend Into the rear parking lot of the PO
Please note, you will also have to contact the newspaper vendors (machines), so they can be relocated dunng
construction - upon completion, they could go back Into the new "plaza" area, perhaps abutting the side wall of your
bUilding out of the way
Please contact Mr Legare, and obtain from him what you need - he should be very cooperative He has your names
am sending him a hard copy of thiS commUnication
Bnan, we are researching the actual ownership of the northern portion of the red bnck wall, et ai, which abuts Station
Square Park I am qUite sure that that portion of the wail/landscaping IS owned by Clearwater Tower If so, you will need
to contact them to coordinate your construction staging, etc
Thanks
1
CJv\ ~ ~/MAf Pk!{;) J ~~sl /)M I Bff 15~/()fI/1 Best CottY
\( . ...,
Available
ll- 10 -() ~ ~17\i7CN SQU~ {tJg~~ era:\ec'~
_~A - CloJ1 ()LSC[ZflrJ:l!J~ [tJ mfn?~Ni!S~ ( ~
fA ~ ru~ rt))\J(h) -GfWr Jlh1 &1~ 11) cthlfo1t
CAN tJo1C fDtL rf)f?r1.[I{ @ N6 {LAtJ
~~ W/o'Jt ~~ dff1ete o~ Cut^J~LAJJO
~s - uS/t0( ISflO fN ~J}J~ ( A(~g
rr1lf' ~)
~~ [)Jl11\l CtIj rrJf!1.&'It~U: tJMr ~ @IDM~
-1mlluN ~ pnl( ~bIA ~) lib ~Apt If'
=.C ~ faAND ~STiLur~&~ ~ f1uJ~l
eM MtP/Os lGY\1tOVl/\t- ~ 17fVlLNb D~ rbrL
~S<'((LuCTI6~ C\~ 100 ~~ fi1 {N ~
QD)J :ru ~r16)0 IJ!I. ~ JC e ~6 211?Or ~
1LD l&C (RJrl kJ1 S/Ifit,~ ~ ( Lf1}t- ~,z -04)
HA- M llr6 f;e.- M~( TD srAut {~ 6 Y (. HNJ&Jr
~ fttJ1311"B ~161'4 -7
PA- WE M ~ ['fELl diJrf (r~ 2/1fpv1)vV(2,J).6;0r
oJ~ C6Wl (1/]1 ( -
~- JJYW\ ~I~ cYf-18)vuc wi Pc oUZ- y&-
-L&'-~D~
P\A J\A&AJ6 t1loN\ ~ fV\JL S11lf2 <<1rtf2 ncfb
~WI(A- j flbST ofi1CP CLfAJUftJQ~ndl0 SQ-)
1 ~
L1,~ .
...,
Best Copy
Available
.....
MA
ornm J~17L
wlll
~
~
P/l- Nit- Jf/L-1 liPJ AJ~ It( UPJ~?
WI l) W l L cfiF~{ 1- ff)(L WILl
'}. -\,
..
Best Copy
Available
.
..
@
b
lufl
2fCA!T
-~/Nb
. 1f;J ft))CfYIJ IV 6
U S1lNo ~ ~ (Y!0~
f~
TIC (L - P U\z,f lD Y0 ftttro fUU ,
fs!tILo~ t C0fU;fZufitJf) G( teff
~
UN~f{l{;c(WAJ ~
MKf 0U~ / f61fL ~CP
~Ji/l+ B # 2(Jly-f -- S~ C ~f1f1fL 17 pJ
1 B MaNfij LJ!N0f,efe TlffA( '1! M~rrzft11Jb
-
,. 'fly -
Best Copy
Available
~ fk6uVYlS
- NlcJL - ND {j;grtPTUf1L,
... (Yl,\.{ I Q- fJ/JrH-1N6 ~6 :1lUf1'f Nb PMJ K S ::
fJDf fUN fC-l\l61A61t ~ lllvllnill ~YVlYYVtl4L! frL d - SJMucD
E ffJl'L ~f~}tfW\Jr !~fVrvG
- tb -/ SI1JJJflJ2 w6 ~01J fiSt- fu fJuL G tJ!iNd;) NeCA 6
- ~lL-G~~ Z ~ Th)i0 fGv~J /ff1~ s:
tS .... Miler? tu/~ ttfrs (NJ1U2(~ IN ~ r:
~ ~ ~ DI0u)) It~~illfffijl ~ TtfLs
UJt~
bJl\ - ~ CJ)J~~17 ~ ~ffVl ~f f1J Pl () fffct0
- 0lUZ((;l}
tvl ~M ~ U4rO
f'\\'?Lf ffllG ~ 151) (~f lib,,) fOcU5 o)j
I2l2.u. ~ENr ~)L~ (J/NIS> ":t
( rr-k6{~'
0
L o'l\#~
~\)~
r ,
~~ ,
LANGUAGE FOR BECK RETAIL
TO BE INSERTED INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(S)
1 Allowable retail uses The developer has cOIrurutted to the development of retaIl
and restaurant uses on the fIrst floor of the project m partIal fulfIllment of the
reqUIrements to obtam addItIOnal reSIdentIal umts pursuant to the PublIc AmemtIes
DensIty Pool of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Therefore, for the
purposes of thIS project, "allowable retaIl uses" are defmed as and lImIted to the
followmg
· RetaIl establIshment that sells or leases goods dlfectly to the consumer, Ie, book
store, gIft shop, antIque store, flonst, clothmg store, VIdeo store
. Art Gallery
· Gourmet grocery store, wIth accessory sales of alcoholIc beverages The gourmet 1/
grocery story may also mclude prepared food for off SIte consumptIon ~ ~u
· ~estaurant WIth accessory sales of alcoholIc beverages 5wDN TWb
· SIdewalk cafe as accessory to the pnnclpal retaIl use
--
2 Prohibited Uses. The followmg uses are prohIbIted from locatIOn wlthm the
project due to theIr mcompatIbIlIty wIth both the reSIdentIal nature of the project and WIth
the goals, objectIves and polICIes of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan
· All uses prohIbIted by the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan
· All other retaIl uses not specIfIcally IdentIfIed above, pursuant to the Communzty
Development Code's defmItIOn of retaIl sales and serVIces
. Nlghtclub/Bar
· AlcoholIc Beverage Package Store
· MedIcal or Vetennary offIces
· Any other use determmed by the Commumty Development Coordmator not to
share the charactenstIcs of "allowable retaIl uses"
3 Timing/Alternate Uses The developer shall actIvely market and use hIS best
efforts to obtam tenants tor the fIrst floor retaIl space as one or more of the allowable
retaIl uses descnbed above However, should the developer be unable to obtam an
allowable retaIl use wIthm one year of Issuance of the temporary CertIfIcate of
Occupancy for the retaIl space, the CIty may allow, upon wntten request of the
developer, one or more of the followmg alternate uses to occupy the fIrst floor retaIl
l
space 'Pe,~ 6:e)\Af~('~.-S
. TaIlor or seamstress
. Dry cleaners
· FmancIal InstItutIon
· Busmess OffIce-but not medIcal or vetennary offIce
-
~ , ,1
r
Whenever an alternate use tenant vacates the retaIl space, the developer shall use hIS best
efforts to re-establIsh the retaIl space WIth an allowable use as defmed m paragraph 1
above
CRT/ November 6,2003
-
<, ~
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent:
To.
Cc
SubJect.
Owens, Reginald W
Thursday, November 06, 2003 4 28 PM
Stone, Ralph, Akin, Pam, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa
Phillips, Sue, Wilson, Denise A
RE Beck Development Agreement
Cyndl . the language IS fine - unless I hear otherwise, I Will forward to Beck tomorrow morning - he has confirmed for
Monday - thanks
-----Ongrnal Message-----
From: Stone, Ralph
Sent. Thursday, November 06,20034 19 PM
To: Akin, Pam, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Owens, Reginald W
Ce: Phillips, Sue, Wilson, Denise A
Subject FW Beck Development Agreement
this works for me, lets see how they respond
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Harriger, Sandy
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4 15 PM
To: Stone, Ralph
Subject: FW Beck Development Agreement
Sandy Harnger
562-4039
Admin Analyst - City Manager's Office
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent. Thursday, November 06, 2003 4 11 PM
To: Phillips, Sue, Harriger, Sandy, Akin, Pam, Owens, Reginald W , Fierce, Lisa
Ce. Clayton, Gina, DeWitt, Gina, Gerlock, Frank
Subject. Beck Development Agreement
Please find attached a draft of the reta1llanguage for the Beck development agreement LIsa will be attenchng
the QRT for Planrung on Monday If you all feel appropnate, please share tlus draft wIth Beck represental1ves
I thmk It captures the cnl1callssues that we have been dtscussmg WIth them Thanks
< < F1le Beck reta1llanguage for DA doc> >
Cyndl T arapam
Planrung Dltector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
1
- otu/4 Lf(Grf (5F?lpft/ft1'~>1 MA I fW (fVl0
II ~ - ~ N-1 P)lLUlN Wl1JtU?1i1 (.lA'1 CAS$AND (fJ I (,f-- fA/l)rJr-, 'to'; ~ CF1~)
O/tB-'D? OrJ SQuAtL6 I(jA L0
~w.
\ (me ftZA7vl ~ l1X- fi 1\J(?5};M 0 It lZ mL@'( rYlt- - t~ J 0
~ . ~ ~~ ~ if eMf t)Lff 7r1r~
[I\j 11NA7Jr ~1I~ ~ YVLWo\ 03~ t5Jt1L
::f:Q Clti C 1lk: JftlS IQ ~ ~/) U I J0r
( (J fVI~r otz~
\))t-tM'~ W tID.ru~~ ~ l 'ft-8 "? e:;Y(DJ ~ to y~ ~
-- 00" ~tJf uJ!\NL-1Q QV(;[Z DE60U1TE-
(1- LuL0C B8m0LlslA e~fI) Lt~ OF uLS~_
0tu 'fA fbrl, ret\J[)I~ ~ Q Q. fu~
(~vvn~'-{ 0~)JtJ;thI6l~
r U0rD-\- tbvtN ~lrrr if1{tf: oN f1i)6
\JJ OC~(ts0S ~~ u~
Best-Copy
Available
- flfJ/4NUf{)b l~<;lJ~
-- D1W~~/0 P~Jh\J N f~u!fG T7 rYlr2 LS~eut1P)
.--r UrYl m~ C0~c;,1lW0fl6!'J ~ oNE '-/rz fWrVI
~(;O Sl N i. (S 1lt~fXb CAA~I N~ 1 j: i 0 o!fie; WrVl
13:~DON Of ~~~}
.--- --- .----.-- -----..-- ..----
C1 -# .u
-
~
:: PJUIW INTO 1) ~~ -r D 01lD1Cr2-)
f
- PaD7) C~6 77+z I\J (3) torL.
)f\fD Me -- Pp~i9'JfrG 5Iaw l C/O C i1t7 l()f- ~ UiftItY f'[6
/
~fVl )
lJ2{)1-n1fJl10D" !r0uL-T u,Sf5 j ~ ~ ~ PLDl5D
[ttt~_) ~
-
1-/&
..
;/
I
~ N
DI1~
Available
- erJLfU) MJ JC6( Crt- (] P t U
(jfJ - ND7 lJlJ U11 LUNb ~ 70 PK1 u /u~
~
",-
~
dJ~
fJlv( - ND f)U/lJ)
fJWb Uf)
u::oft?., Ou.alfrt(V'J (1UVrl
yqo:J :t -#
eldsUsvA
-
"Richard Zingale"
<nchardz@urbanstudlo com>
10/15/2003 04 23 PM
To <bnanmurphy@beckgroup com>
cc
bcc
Subject
f
!
*
FlexIble Development ApplIcatIOn
Page 3 of? ~(\
Item 10 The desIgn of the bUIldmgs complIes wIth the ~ DIStrIct desIgn gUIdelmes m
DIvIsIOn 5 of Article 3 (as applIcable) Use separate sheets as necessary
DoW~(\
Ther~ are several levels on whIch the bUIldmg complIes as well as remforce specIfic aspects of
theTuur.rStDIstnct desIgn gUIdelmes The structure has a dIstmct base element that reflects the
proportIOns and fenestratIOn of the adjacent Post Office The Post Office IS dIstmct m ItS respect
of MedIterranean Arcmtecture as mterpreted by the hIstoncally acclaimed archItect, AddIson
MIsner StonelIke matenals Will be used to clad the base element along WIth colorful canopIes, a
deeply recessed loggia and large wmdows that wIll anImate the pedestrIan expenence whIle
traversmg Cleveland Street The bUIldmg mIddle contmues the proportIOns and detaIl found In
the base mtroducmg another level of detaIl m the decorative gnllwork located m the fenestration
ThIS sectIOn of the bUIldmg IS accentuated WIth canopIes as well and culmmates WIth a
freestandmg timber column and beam detaIl that creates another loggIa at the SIxth level The
remammg floors have a varIety of punched opemngs and tnm details that are pronounced through
several color changes and bUIldmg setbacks The bUIldmg IS dIstmctly capped WIth a crown
mold detaIl bold enough to be apprecIated from grade The scale of the structure IS mItigated by
the scale and frequency of aforementIOned deSIgn details respectmg the pedestnan expenence as
well as remforcmg the deSIgn dIrectIOn descnbed m the gUIdelmes
1
l
1
,
\ilY\a;\- aJoD* ~+ClN'\tR. w[ ~cLitv pvllU~
tQ dJt-- ~~,?_,
-7clJ P Jwt~ ~~ 1!t1~ pad ~
~
l
r-rfjf~?0b--~;;~~ .
. I
o~l -O~ /MF1~
Nell, PJU)
~~lO( ~ t:- ~HtZ fi~6~Av2A11oJ lO~D ~^l)S
Ai f LLcAnoJ - 6W6 ON C
WGL ' {\J
O'frtNCN6S
7711C
811tff
'~6N ~F ItLL
Best Copy
.
....
.
,
"Richard Zingale"
<nchardz@urbanstudlo com>
10/15/2003 04 23 PM
To <bnanmurphy@beckgroup com>
cc
bcc
SubJect
FlexIble Development ApplIcatIOn
Page 3 of 7 i __ ,rI'-
1)wJY'~ .
Item 10 The desIgn of the bUIldmgs complIes wIth the JJMfISt DIstnct desIgn gUIdelmes m
DIvIsIOn 5 of ArtIcle 3 (as applIcable) Use separate sheets as necessary
"
hvM-
There J#~llevels on whIch the bUIldmg complIes as well as remforce speCIfic aspects of
the TJlR1'ist DIstnct desIgn gUIdelmes The structure has a dIstmct base element that reflects the
proportIOns and fenestratIOn ofthe adJacent Post Office The Post Office IS dIstmct m ItS respect
of MedIterranean Arcmtecture as mterpreted by the hIstoncally acclaImed arcmtect, AddIson
MIsner Stone lIke matenals wIll be used to clad the base element along wIth colorful canopIes, a
deeply recessed loggia and large wmdows that wIll anImate the pedestrIan expenence whIle
traversmg Cleveland Street The bUIldmg mIddle contmues the proportIOns and detaIl found In
the base mtroducmg another level of detaIl m the decorative gnllwork located m the fenestratIOn
ThIS sectIOn of the bUIldmg IS accentuated With canopIes as well and culmmates With a
freestandmg timber column and beam detaIl that creates another loggIa at the SIxth level The
remaIrung floors have a variety of punched operungs and tnm details that are pronounced through
several color changes and bUIldmg setbacks The bUIldmg IS dIstmctly capped WIth a crown
mold detaIl bold enough to be appreCiated from grade The scale of the structure IS mItigated by
the scale and frequency of aforementIOned deSIgn details respectmg the pedestnan expenence as
well as remforcmg the deSIgn dIrectIOn descnbed m the gUIdelmes
rlw.e tcm~ ~/o6J-/
~
~
'j
I
~
f
,
,
tL~~ (f 'it> - 9f )
~ (~,91)
lrlCl I ~~ ...
~ M.~) Nta-- PAV~(; DM'W PfJU41ty
~N
f~ TO P;;fU1fN
5
()J 1)4 <: l~ ) b1) ~
{- ~AtG ftlO ~ " (L(t" cAt..s 4 z. ? (i) 0 ~ S ({If-
~~0 ~~D J '1J1, ~O Ct~ C:;1~
-X:. th?-AftZ:.. ~ f7[vJ s{~flbtt- MM
e ~ Q 1\1 ({/[PJ2. \ fbfL
--0(-. - ~ CdJL[) M1J If
Lntlh l~ WI ~ ) - QUI'! ~H ()~) V!UU) ~E LlJJtA)
.
LULCG ~e"ll]~ ~Stf\r
~vb ~ 1l {IN
ftm2- {8L{ 1iti12-
t~~(O?1 . .
,
~ Best Copy
~ W\7i {)l~ ~__ P;US1~'ZsS @2!N/0 Available
~ /@ -/ M&j_~~ (J-J A- VfHJUl
Pl)f k @tlO oN ~~) -- CJjhf~_lD
f211Nr)
1fllt10 ~~ ~ f1U:. 3,1t4tf';/Jf\!Ztf- ~
~~2-tNlJ} [LU~f
- Wid] ~PJtl11&7 fDlz- W?6 ~{r AI !JtJj
LA:[ (Z{<b~1 ..- ~ uJAu( ~ ~AT
C;Nh r&Jjaft{Jr',1--/ ~ 7//()W!+Glt- 1 10
~k~ Ci-fh fU) + N (N} IV! If fYl 1-
CN W~~_eo1ftML/!f:G ~ ~~( fOIL
of~~ (jf
~ Pz!j ~ ~ or:- ~G - tOt_om-4
u)tGL ht Ct1bJ: N f~ CfViJ( frzE -LIhsl )_~ftt
C ~ UA0l ~L~_Qv0~~ ~0fP ~
U)2I( j N1tcfL-- wl~(J'fb tv LfjCJt., ~lUfC IN ~
-~
./" PAuLll{0 5t2- mAlL- L ~/1lJtLtW1 (
- M ~ nf1t, p~ r?~t% -12tri 57fJ1"2ti'lJ
- MA1M~ or fv ~ Pl1:G <sr~? U
- N~) Otm~IJNJMl ~p~ ~
- ~V ~l11IffNE2 ~
CQ C fU) 1 6~,. Pt1fV1 1V Po ~d: ~
-C2 {~UJZ117.- CJLA r-\ Cc, ~?
D-L e ~ b~_1Q t?J1i (!Jrfl/ f&t /0) tss (tg
~O / lJJANl h~!L~ cg {t-( ~ ~
fl2-: --e.t?(aAViA-N13 (A~ ~ ~ Nf~ML_~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ra fk- (c
~_~ tJfJMA!1J S ~TZ- <
J~
)1-
~
1l/YJ{~
VfC1z1 u&4rr
11t./UASG oF5J
~
fOYL7llN
(( 2j. ~7J2) ::
[.? //,^'& .
-~7-
~c5Y
r f4 /2, 9fJJ
~?
/~
AhlG1VJl
PLfM::2-
{tff
'AiJJ(~t;JI/ rn0
~o~
LLlVt
~~
~
to (rotO? . .
-i
(
~J;
- l-hJw u ~ ~lJ/~ ~!tN (h~ tJ)J/t()L 7? YJ1{? ?
C~cr f11W ~) f~9fN ~ '!l-frcM
...- ~~ 10 ~ fN ~ AJJv0 TV
-r (/:J fOfX1Aj
rLA1\/ N /I'ib uJ/;LA- (iJwe WL 6~ W'5 r ())IJ#
6N u~t7 - fJJs: (Jt)o ~f2/JNr). rli4t tTWL-) Pre
t?uNrt', ~ r'rtvur [11tYr ft1Z..
{}Jla IS 6lL if 112-/ yrh6 r f?lf( OJ;lN6 AN our
~ ~ ~ fYllJ1zt:<< w/fN( ~ tJ;.Cr (
QrrJf', fJ~ \/fJuJ!6 )
15- r&l[ (h~ MJI!2:{r-f- ~lt:tr6 * {5~ 10 (LJ[t ~lI.~
~~ ftNT~ j fiN/!!:!:/_1!2 ~ ott2U-t) ~
~n~~t^~~/~fi
cr ~~~ nr-J P1J~t} 6ff7~ -W/U uJP$<1 ~~
Best Copy
Availa5le
II
I
(
~
( 01~~y.O ?
fiOe.M- (~
!!!!pact Fees for Station Square Development
(fA~f) tyJ 140 ()/u) - f)[JJ[ thl ~i~
-~ fO (L#I(U-J WI ~lftN ~orr
1 Water Fee - $115,200
- $480 per umt = $67,200
- $48,000 for 6" pump
2 Sewer Fee - $216,000
- $900 per umt = $126,000
- $90,000 for 6" pump
3 Plans ExammatIOn Fee - $36,390
- $1,890 (greater than $1,000,000 of value) + $1 50 per $1,000 of value ($34,500)
4 BUIldmg Permit Fee - $38,630
- $4,130 (greater than $1,000,000 of value) + $1 50 per $1,000 of value ($34,500)
5 TransportatIOn Fee - $128,160 (WL1 6U::0 \f" ffJfu ~
- $794 per umt = $111,160 {S- G
- $1,700 per 1,000 Sq Ft = $17,000 ~/
6 Development Fee - $36,000
- $250 per umt = $35,000
- $250 per 2,500 Sq Ft = $1,000
1 /vWtZM w~ lfJ w~ ~~
rJ.I~W~~f ~
Impact Fee Total = $570,380
f~tffJ jP'Jut of'~ ~
ArN0 N1Jl ~LJtzefJ )
tPossible Parks and Recreation Fee (I will know by Wednesday)
- ofJriN
-- ('L{?~ (A-N7) ~
~{);6 .' lKlcr(~/ ~
.~ ~s CAfU--! b fA /t;J rII LA.f-f 1Jv{ ( (Llc!fJwD 2w
IO-7-D~ -"fAll
.....-
f; ftis/ /J/VII'S ~
-
~
ON
( MAL f)rf
ON
lu ifl)1- 17m
o I!VI f!:N ~ (j N>
:ItG~
ft0~
~~
tb f2A1 r~ ~f1)
o ro (~ l6~ ~~L0 cF G ll(jl'j -+- f)~16J
t Copy
Available
C';
,
, I - .
J
,
.
-
I
('
( I I j\
-- / I
--- ---
y /1/ ~ , /"
" '\. /' Y
"""?' ."" /
~ --->-- - ~ ~
~ -- ~
---= J ~
) - ./ ~
-
II -r
,
.
,
"Ii"'lln~ t
... .
9~:jsU&VA
",
-
to ~7 .()
Best Copy
~
-=>
Q
..
~ /
~/
(
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent.
To.
Cc
Subject:
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4 43 PM
Wilson, Denise A , Phillips, Sue, Akin, Pam, Harriger, Sandy
Arasteh, Mahshld, QUillen, Michael, Bertels, Paul, Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina, Gerlock, Frank,
Campos, Geraldine
Beck project review
I Just wanted to let you know that we met With Bnan Murphy of Beck and Denrus Karr, Archttect today and here
are some abbreviated notes In attendance from the City were Mahshtd, Mtke, Paul Bertels, usa, Frank, Gtna and
Gerl
We had a detatled dtscusslon about the Items reqwred for site plan subrmttal-I will not hst them all but Just want to
htghhght two Issues The estunated traffic from the project will hkely exceed 1000 tnps per day, therefore, a traffic
analysIs will be reqwred to be subrmtted With the sIte plan Paul explatned that the developer should meet With Ben
Elbo to get CIty approval of the traffic methodology, then do the study and subrmt It With the site plan As of
today, Beck has not htred a CIVU engmeer to do thts analYSIS nor the stormwater calculations
Regardtng tree replacement, It was Identified that all removed trees should be replaced tnch for tnch or payment
should be made tnto the tree bank Stnce the project will take down all trees on the site and replacement IS not
hkely based on the site plan, thts fee could be qwte large The fee IS calculated at $48 per tree tnch removed and not
replaced, fee IS payable upon CO Thelt tree survey will Identify the total number of tree tnches to be removed
We then had a detaued dtscusslon about the design They presented a revised plan that we provided comments on
The major design Issues dtscussed are
. the lack of a front door and substantial entryway on Cleveland
. the need to unprove on the facade design to clearly demark a bwldtng base, rmddle floors and cap and to
tntroduce a deSign or deSign features that break up the extreme vertical orientation of the bwldtng SuggeStions
to resolve thts Issue tnclude creation of a more slgntficant entryway With arched features, add arches on the top
row of parktng level, add deSign to top of bwldtng that slgntfies the end of the bwldtng
. the new feature of a gnU tn the rmddle of the bwldtng over the front area that IS massive and urunvltlng The
new grill replaced a glass wall tn thts area on the prevIous deSign
. Materials were dtscussed also and they understand the need to provide samples of matenals and patnt colors
durtng the deSign reVlew process
We all agreed that we would meet agatn next Tuesday, October 6 at approXllnately 1030 or 11 am or unmedtately
after the QRT on the project Please let me know If you have any queStions Thanks to all for attendtng
Cyndl Tarapam
Planrung Dltector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
1
..
.
~
Clayton, Gina
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4 43 PM
Wilson, Denise A , Phillips, Sue, Akin, Pam, Harriger, Sandy
Arasteh, Mahshld, QUillen, Michael, Bertels, Paul, Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina, Gerlock, Frank,
Campos, Geraldine
Beck proJect review
From
Sent
To
Cc
I Just wanted to let you know that we met With Bnan Murphy of Beck and Denrus Karr, Arclutect today and here
are some abbreVIated notes In attendance from the Gty were Mahslud, MIke, Paul Bertels, LISa, Frank, Gma and
Gen
We had a detailed dISCUSSIon about the Items requrred for SIte plan submIttal-I will not lIst them all but Just want to
lughhght two ISsues The estunated traffIC from the project will hkelyexceed 1000 tnps per day; therefore, a traffIC
analysIS will be requrred to be submItted With the SIte plan Paul explamed that the developer should meet With Ben
Elbo to get Gty approval of the traffIC methodology, then do the study and submIt It With the SIte plan. As of
today, Beck has not lured a CIvil engmeer to do tlus analysis nor the stormwater calculatIons
Regardmg tree replacement, It was IdentifIed that all removed trees should be replaced mch for mch or payment
should be made mto the tree bank. Smce the project will take down all trees on the SIte and replacement IS not
hkely based on the SIte plan, tlus fee could be qUIte large The fee IS calculated at $48 per tree mch removed and not
replaced, fee IS payable upon CO Therr tree sUlVey will identIfy the total number of tree mches to be removed
We then had a detailed dISCUSSIon about the deSIgn They presented a reVISed plan that we prOVIded comments on
The major deSIgn ISsues dIScussed are
. the lack of a front door and substantIal entrywayon Oeveland
. the need to Improve on the facade deSIgn to clearly demark a bmldmg base, mIddle floors and cap and to
mtroduce a deSIgn or deSIgn features that break up the extreme vertIcal onentatIon of the bmldmg. Suggestions
to resolve tlus ISsue mclude creation of a more sIgmficant entryway With arched features, add arches on the top
row of parkIng level, add deSIgn to top of bmldmg that sIgmfies the end of the bmldmg
. the new feature of a gnll m the mIddle of the bmldmg over the front area that IS masSIve and urunVItmg The
new gnll replaced a glass wall m tlus area on the preVIOUS design
. Matenals were dIScussed also and they understand the need to proVIde samples of matenals and pamt colors
dunng the deSIgn reVIew process
We all agreed that we would meet agam next Tuesday, October 6 at apprmamately 1030 or 11 am or unmedIately
after the QRT on the project Please let me know If you have any queStions Thanks to all for attendmg
Cyndi T arapani
Planmng Drrector
(727)562-4547nctarapan@clearwater-fl com
1
I
l~-O3 . atL~fU
-milliWfL
-~, ~\~~~~~ ~~i~~
_f:JliL~, ~(lQU1kriI--W1lt~ ~tmcL~~ ~ - Joud
~Lt ~ lP.~";,_C _ _ _$-- _ _...L -- kf:i- 0,- -- -
-~~
-~ ' ;--fi7-att!(j\)Vtt
_f!.IW1~-_ W~ diEs -Li rYP- 'flup+ - erlOY rf{J Cf) ?
-~ <, .
T~~ lJll~Itm,VI_ -w-dfl tJu;"
_" __.-,- (]){-edl-1. ~mav~~
t---~0J2 Ct(~ -- eM. ~ --- - 6dz-~
&i.C!.2 UthmK aJ-cf!Y~ .
I ~~ UJ_ fA-----
u_ n' T ~ \J b~
._~~~1LOO --fJ ~ Yr1fl;'
~rp-~ L~r~-- C,un ;
Uf11rn;( zmL~vf ~fwdJnL _/::;~
~(tnUJflP3-~ ~ ~df'tJ~ r(:O\ ~_ (S
- civaut~~~~_{IJim _~
60-dYd&E?-~o-%!J!!t G!!!. ..,M"; - rl1 ~-
E't!L"fl! ~
m '
- leA" <L WJ11&I. - -:7J-:;:;:r
~ Wo2g;( tMJi-.lS_~ JJ~~~~
,---rYY\f-rLd:::ftw EB~
.
.
I
~
,
I
I
"
.
I
---2--
'f
Best Copy
.
~~
, ~{<;
wt-
I
f
,
I
~~nlJty-~~(@l ~~ rdiiPt aiJ-
_~_ 'w.@JNM. ~L_fSS!!& 71____ (lOv71rmu
~U ~ ,pwpPJ_O!f.~ a1JL~ruJ1
_~~L ---
----~ - ~~~-~ dO (i} - flrc::7J r/;;t
-4 ~~ ~LG11D ~ (aLJ!)!;. p~
~t5i1LJAJfuf&rtt1 &u1ds-~ ~_15 (jjjjjfj)~
-&([~
-~-~j 'ov ~[
u-~tb~~-~ --='
bJl--rot ~~~ ' ~ rvr3d.il2. 3/tL fIIW~
Best-CoPY
Available
JW -~ ~4JU~~-~v~ -~
G'L~, - ~_ul(1L1tk
W(uf-C1tCWl~llDt--wrr~ ?l1~~L~
lJLdaL& ~ - -lUJJLo-<-- - - ~ :-')
PiJrJlJ{1.JLaJiJJd:-~ ---~; ~ r-
-lJ-r-:-l- I
b~LL _ ____ _ (j,('~ IljQ
101LLl- _ ~ -w-cdJ;A - t~ ~ I
,
.~e. rs~l ~9-;3{LO.rYl.
.~ ~ Qr:LJ~U~\-.Cm~(1(~ ~l~ ~~wrl
--------
_-lcr{~9.-(&~{H It! P B
r7 Ii {f!l-~ iN j ~'iNl ~ a\1z1z.
o
Available
~.
~
-
./
or
?
,
vr C & UA7.A
~~ UIw//fJ1
\
\
\
q cF {lffrjzf{ ~
fP'~
e/L$() I rr
-
--,'"'
7 caAUPI~~
~Ulli ~ rr-J ~LA:;& /
%-1-~-~'1d (f~)
~A) f1~N( ~
IYl 0sM7i:i ~ ~ t'Cl~JrJJ(,j fVvL ~_
~ ~L {~A-J (ZkNi
~~~
lASVYh f~(){j 15 // 1) L5lJU) C~~ ~
Cilfl1A/~~~S
~V\~LLL~~~
~7.
I lA~
N& ~~~O @lt~.~~~\ ~TD
rb(~ t:r~~ \ 1V\ONb1l)N~1 ~ CXt~ ON prZtrJt-gy;
~) ,
"'Nt, ~~LA0 IN (\/L~I'J LJ!s1-J-i;q,.!:,1.
W\Jl l ruJ,Jh rV\ P\l~ 1L> net u (
,
tTl~2j
on 6Y &N.5> - ~ LS ~ C1JJL}fL ?;;;
Best Copy
AvailC': ' '
o SUBMIT 13 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $/ IV ~
f'Q-IJ ')' 7)/fD
* NOTE 14 TOTAL SE~\DNFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
~-r-<XT~~
--"- ,/ ~l:~" (~~( CA:t.tt.
Oite % &.:
t~ > w#.' Planning Department
. ~!%~ ,~arwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue
o ~ Clearwater, Flonda 33756
~ Telephone 727-562-4567
Fax 727-562-4865
o
SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
q-" I) <J3
CASE #
DATE RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY (staff InitIals)
ATLAS PAGE #
ZONING DISTRICT
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (ReVIsed 06/23/2003)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use additIOnal sheets as necessary
A. APPLI~ANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION (Section 4-202 A)
APPLICANT NAME
MAILING ADDRESS
E-MAIL ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
CELL NUMBER
FAX NUMBER
utA \2>/A( f\tl ( L.A[ (f\i:ltNeJ)
(Must IndUd) ALL owners)
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
f ~1VJf4v\1 6'ffi~
Jf cof.f,
AGENT NAME(S)
MAILING ADDRESS
E-MAIL ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
CELL NUMBER
FAX NUMBER
B PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
STREET ADDRESS of subject site
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(If not listed here, please note the location of this document In the submittal)
PARCEL NUMBER
PARCEL SIZE
(acres square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE
(number of dwelling Units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S)
(Include all requested code deviatIOns, e g reductIOn In reqUIred number of parking spaces, specific use etc)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
-------,--------
------
___ ~-=v-I HIS-APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PRc v ,vUSL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
-- DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (If yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Section 4-202 A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 3-913 A)
o Provide complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each cntena IS achieved, In detail
The proposed development of the land will be In harmony With the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In
which It IS located
2 The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropnate development and use of adjacent land and bUildings or significantly
Impair the value thereof
3 The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons reSiding or working In the neighborhood of the proposed
use
4 The proposed development IS deSigned to minimiZe traffiC congestion
5 The proposed development IS consistent With the community character of the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development
6 The deSign of the proposed development minimiZeS adverse effects, Including Visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts,
on adjacent properties
o ProVide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria IS achieved In detail
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development IS otherwise Impractical Without deViations from the use, intensity
and development standards
Page 2 of 7 - FleXible Development Application - ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
.--------
r
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project or residential Inflll project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties (Include the eXisting value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
Improvements)
::\ The uses within the comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project are otherwise permitted In the City of Clearwater
4 The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses
5 SUitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project are not
otherwise available In the City of Clearwater
6 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project will upgrade the Immediate VICInity
of the parcel proposed for development
7 The design of the proposed comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
8 FleXibility In regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are Justified by the benefits to community character and the
Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
9 Adequate off street parking In the Immediate VICInity according to the shared parking formula In DIVIsion 14 of Article 3 will be available to
aVOid on-street parking In the Immediate VICInity of parcel proposed for development
10 The deSign of all bUildings complies with the Tounst Dlstnct or Downtown Dlstnct deSign gUidelines In DIVISion 5 of Article 3 (as applicable)
Use separate sheets as necessary
1tn~ C8W1 fG/,;t2
ull ()~ (Z{AN
---
-
~VUJx c l0vvWJ,vf:r / LfYvt
U
Page a of 7 - FleXible Development Application - ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
'\, .
E SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A)
J
o
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal descnplion of property) - One ongmal and 12 copies, fJD C~
TREE SURVEY (Including eXisting trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by speCies, size (DBH 4" or greate( ~~
Including dnp lines and indicating trees to be removed), -f~ t2-P...f~aY\ 1l1VI~ l.
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, ..;-;- IAr~i1i If'~ P(le{J(L [l) cj ()
o
o
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Pnor to
the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be In
accordance With accepted traffiC englneenng pnnclples The findings of the study Will be used In determining whether or not deViations to the
parking standards are approved, ~f~~ W1~r (fb.~ 1\lDr CAJ J'N0 fw fV.tL ~ G
/~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable,
/1" PRELIMINARY PLAT, as requlFe~UNote BUlld.!J!',9 p.7l;mrfllll f10tybe ISsued until eVld~ce ..w~ordlng a final plat IS prOVided),
, UdJ/'i [)t. tf'L.VJ NOr LANT) fe/'\]
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable,
F SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A)
o SITE PLAN With the follOWing Information (not to exceed 24" X 36")
All dimenSions,
North arrow,
Englneenng bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared,
Location map,
Index sheet referenCing IndiVidual sheets Included In package,
Footpnnt and size of all EXISTING bUildings and structures,
Footpnnt and size of all PROPOSED bUildings and structures,
All reqUired setbacks,
All eXlsling and proposed pOints of access,
All reqUired Sight tnangles,
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, Including descnptlon and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and Wildlife habitats, etc,
Location of all public and pnvate easements,
Location of all street nghts-of-way Within and adjacent to the Site,
Location of eXisting publiC and pnvate utilities, Including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and 11ft stations, gas
and water lines,
All parking spaces, dnveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces,
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all reqUired parking lot Intenor landscaped areas,
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical eqUipment and all reqUired screening {per
Section 3-201 (0)(1) and Index #701 j,
Location of all landscape matenal,
Location of all junsdlctlonalllnes adjacent to wetlands,
Location of all onslte and off site storm-water management faCIlities,
Location of all outdoor lighting lixtures, and
Location of all eXisting and proposed Sidewalks
o SITE DATA TABLE for eXisting, reqUired, and proposed development, In wntten/tabular form
Land area In square feet and acres,
Number of EXISTING dwelling units,
Number of PROPOSED dwelling Units,
Gross floor area devoted to each use,
Parking spaces total number, presented In tabular form With the number of reqUired spaces,
Total paved area, Including all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed In square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area,
Size and species of all landscape matenal,
OffiCial records book and page numbers of all eXisting utility easement,
BUilding and structure heights,
Impermeable surface ratio (I S R ), and
Floor area ratio (F A R ) for all nonreSidential uses
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendenng If pOSSible
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, prOVide the follOWing additional Information on site plan
One-foot contours or spot elevations on Site,
Off site elevations If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel,
All open space areas, ,,/
Location of all earth ~water retaining walls and earth berms,
Lot lines and bUilding lines (dimenSioned),
Streets and drives (dimenSioned),
BUlldlng.ancf structural setbacks (dimenSioned),
St~ctural overhangs,
/' Tree Inventory, prepared by a "certified arbonst", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting Size, canopy (dnp lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - FleXible Development Application. ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
,",
.
'-
G
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-1102 A)
o
~ u~
NbT fYI fl:1tfll~ (V\flflI4t{0
~f~
LANDSCAPE PLAN
All eXisting and proposed structures,
Names of abutting streets,
Drainage and retention areas Including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations,
Delineation and dimensions of all required penmeter landscape buffers,
Sight vIsibility triangles,
Delineation and dimenSions of all parking areas including landscaping Islands and curbing,
Proposed and reqUIred parking spaces,
EXisting trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including dnpline (as Indicated on
required tree survey),
Location, Size, descnptlon, speCIfications and quantities of all eXisting and proposed landscape matenals, Including botanical and
common names,
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including Instructions, SOil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures,
Intenor landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Intenor landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and
percentage covered,
Conditions of a prevIous development approval (e g conditions imposed by the Community Development Board),
Irrigation notes
o
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendenng If pOSSible)
o
IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUired for Level Two and Three applications)
o
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater DeSign Cntena Manual and
4-202 A 21)
STORMWATER PLAN including the follOWing requirements
EXisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines,
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures,
All adjacent streets and mUniCipal storm systems,
~ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area Including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure,
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality,
Signature of Flonda registered ProfeSSional Engineer on all plans and calculations
,'~'
A COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEME
(SWFWMD approval IS reqUIred pnor to Issuance of City BUilding Permit), If applicable
~
"7
--;7"
o
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable
l..A~.r1tU2- fiWWI 5r;411 A5Z ~ is /Q..Uj tL-eO
1\f~ N ~SS
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A 23)
ReqUired In the event the application Includes a development where deSign standards are In Issue (e g Tounst and Downtown Dlstncts) or as part
of a ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment Project or a Resldentlallnflll Project 'jrV ~ Ou~67
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all_~I~lngs In~7B height dimenSions, colors and matenals j\jl...... ~~f'
REDUCED BUILDING ELEV A TIO S - tg,UJ~~~~~ colors and matenals to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (black and white and color rendenng, If
pOSSible) as reqUired ~ ~
o
J SIGNAGE (DIVISion 19 SIGNS I Section 3-1806) fu.\})l ~-__ \1- ,~
i\~ g,\':~r-/~c,v
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached Signs, PrOVide photographs and dimenSions (area, height, etc ), indicate wtiether they,wl" moved'(;'r
to remain Q ,/' (~V /"
All PROPOS standlnQ and attached signs, ProVide details IncludlngjQgatlon, Size, height, colors, matenals and draWing/'
COrTlprehenslve Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee reqUired)
--- -- -- ---------------- .......
Reduced slgnage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting ComprehenSive Sign Program-application
o
o
,}
o
Page 5 of 7 - FleXible Development Application - ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
11
-- fl 10) -~ ne.Arr1 G SrtuT;;,
IS (If~u (jV1vf)
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (Section 4-202 A 13 and 4-801 C) -jfl(!r:cr-W! (~ 17) D/fGuSs,
@ IYI ~i?ff)ODU'XJv1 I)ep/;~ ~l) 1 ftGiZft.e 17/fr
o Include as required If proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for af{y'r\;adway as-adoptee In the Comprehensive Plan ~
Tnp generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportalion Engineer's Tnp General Manual Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Communrty Development Code for exceptions to thiS requirement
I
L SIGNATURE
I, the underSigned, acknowledge that all representations made In thiS
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authonze City representatives to VISit and photograph the property
descnbed In thiS application
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscnbed before me thiS _ day of
A D 20_ to me and/or by
, who IS personally known has
p~oo~ u
Identification
Notary public,
My commission expires
Signature of property owner or representative
Page 6 of 7 - FleXible Development Application - Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
I
~
q
M AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT'
(Names of all property owners)
1 That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following descnbed property (address or general location)
2 That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a (descnbe request)
3 That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition,
3 That thiS affidaVit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Flonda to consider and act on the above descnbed property,
4 That the applicant acknowledges that all Impact fees (parks and recreation, traffiC, etc ) will be paid PRIOR to the Issuance of a bUilding permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first,
S That site VISitS to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process thiS application and the owner authonzes City
representatives to VISit and photograph the property descnbed In thiS application,
6 That (I/we), the undersigned authonty, hereby certify that the foregOing IS true and correct
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Flonda, on thiS day of
personally appeared who haVing been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidaVit that he/she Signed
My CommiSSion Expires
Notary Public
S IPlanmng DepartmentlAppllcatlon Formsldevelopment revlew\2003 FORMSlcomprehenslve mtlll application 6-23-2003 doc
Page 7 of 7 - FleXible Development Application - Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
-i
J
LI
')
I
L
.
r
I
J
L
.
:t
\l
0
r;
-
\l
-
K\
- ~
r;
;:) L/)
--i
f) ~
;:) I
;:)
\l cr---
"-
r;
'I
"-
n
'J
~t
8119103 AMENDED 200312004 APPLICATION SCHEDULE
Level One, Level Two and Level Tbree Applications
To submit lID appltcatlon fur; Flexible Stmdard Developmem, Resid..mat Infi.ll Project, Flexible Developmem or ~ Infill Redevelopment Project approval,
please COIltaa Frank Gerioc:k. Development RevIew Maoa&er (727-5624551), Bryan Beny, Planner (727-562-453~). Wayne Wells. Semor Planoer (727-S62-4S04) or
Mike Reynolds, SenIor Plumer (727-5624&36). The ~roes are Vf!rj IIDJIuIbwtl Level One applicabons will be revtewed by the smfI'-level Developmm ReVJeW
Committee (DRC), both tht: ORe and the CommUlLlty Deve10pmem Board (COB) as put of a pubbc bearm.g wtll1'eVJeW Level Two appficanons. Level Three appl1caboos
(mmexations, land use chznges 8IJd re:zonmp) will be reviewed by !be ORC, COB and dte CIty Com.mWioo for final dJsposrtton (contact Marc Manano, Pbnner, a1 727-
562-4553). All applJeaUeu mot be mmDkte aDd nbmiUed by 11:00 IlOO8 HI deedlme eWe as ..mn belmr. All appl.x:aboDs must be completed m their emirety,
Slgned and 1lObII~ Thirteen copies of the appltca1Jon (one origma] plus 12 COPIeS). and 13 copIe'S of the site plans are reqwred fur the UIituIJ submittal; adtbtrontzJ copz.e3
wz/J be reqtu!ZWJ pnor to review by ~ CDB Plecse oollate and saple all apphcanons and fold all pkms. AppIK:atJoos will be reV1eWed for sufficimcv at the ORC
~ (mformaboa is sufficieDt to make a decermmation about request). If sufficieat by the deadlme as shown below, Level Two cases WlII be scheduled for TeVlew by
the COB. (Noce Request'! for street vacat10n are caosidt:red ~ If leUen of DO obJedIoD. from all unltty pnmders are mcluded m subm1ttaJ) Atteodaocc of the
appl~ve is required 111 DRC and CDB meding$.} Cues c:ontJ.nued atIby the COB need to be TeVL5ed and suffictaIt prior to the dme mfOl'!Dation IS dve to the
CIty Clerk'I office.
~
~ll
~
~
--
~
~du 912!J1OO3 1012312OO3 111'1612003 1UZ6I1t03 tmfZOO4
U by Nooo
~
~ ORe MEETING 10130I1.OO3 12I04I2t83 11fJ3I2OO3 I129fZ004 31t412004
..-
SUJlIlICIENT lllW1083 12Il1/lGl3 IIOSI2OI4 2JW1I04 3/1111104
iDfD. dae for CDB
=
~ COB Ad ill 11/l9118D3 110312OO4 1IJ1J2084 1fZ8I'1OO4 .wJf2OO4
U Nempaper
COB Ml'.ETING 1111611103 11'282004 1117 fZOO4 3/1612004 412012OO4
~J!
ot
U_
-
...'"
I>
me
~ end ~ Sca:!ng$\T~ Js:Iam:t Filcs\OU3\WEB ln1D REVISED FULS-lOOJ.<)4 ~ doc
0../ (f~--o3
f~~ ~ f?J~
'-z:::=.
.
DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
Hazardous tree means a tree that constItutes a
hazard to lIfe or has a sIgmficant potentIal to
cause mJury to persons or damage to property as
the tree IS m Immment danger of fallmg, or IS
otherwIse conSIdered to be or lIkely to create a
hazard A hazardous tree shall mclude but not be
lImIted to dead, dIseased, broken, splIt, cracked,
learung and uprooted trees A hazardous tree
shall also mclude a tree harbonng commurucable
dIseases or msects of a type that could mfest and
cause the declIne of adjacent trees
)
He~ght, bwldmg or structure, means for buIld-
mgs, the vertIcal dIstance from the mean eleva-
tIon of the eXIstmg grade to the hIghest firushed
roof surface m the case of a bUIldmg WIth a flat
roof, or the vertIcal dIstance from the eXIstIng
grade to a pomt representmg the mIdpomt of the
peak and eave heIghts of the mam roof structure
of the roof of a bUIldmg havmg a pItched roof For
other structures, the vertIcal dIstance from eXIst-
mg grade to the hIghest pomt of the structure
above such eXIstmg grade Where mmImum floor
elevatIOns m flood prone areas have been estab-
lIshed by law, the bUIldmg heIght may be mea-
sured as though the reqUIred mImmum floor
elevatIOns constItute eXIstmg grade In addItIon,
(1) lInear radIO and teleVISIOn antennas shall be
permItted to project ten feet hIgher than the
maxImum heIght otherwIse speCIfied for the zon-
mg dIstnct WIthIn whIch the antenna IS located
ParabolIc and other geometncally shaped an-
tenna shall not be permItted thIS heIght mcrease
(2) Flagpoles located on top of bUIldIngs shall be
permItted to project ten feet hIgher than the
maxImum heIght otherwIse speCIfied for the zon-
mg dIstnct assIgned to the property (3) Elevator
eqUIpment rooms and lIke mechamcal eqUIpment
enclosures shall be permItted to project up to 16
feet hIgher than the maXImum heIght otherwIse
speCIfied for the zomng dIstnct assIgned to the
property (4) Parapet walls constructed on buIld-
mgs WIth flat roofs shall be permItted to extend
not hIgher than 30 mches over the maXImum
heIght speCIfied for the zomng dIstnct m whIch
the bUIldIng IS located
Supp No 1
~ 8-102
H~ghest adjacent grade means the hIghest nat-
ural elevatIOn of the ground surface, prIor to
constructIOn, next to the proposed walls of a
structure
FLAT ROOF
~D lrffi
I
PITCHED ROOF
PEAK I
EAVE-,~
CJ
[j
r --,t- HIGHEST FINISH,
I ROOF SURFACE
CJ
W
~ EXISTING GRADE
I
~r MIDPOINT
j: (MAIN ROOF)
CJ
W
I
,-ir- EXISTING GRADE
OTHER STRUCTURES
i HIGHEST POINT
l-
I
CJ
W
I
-.t- EXISTING GRADE
CD8 15
.---
--
.--
fof:6Z 6-N L ~~-
t71?rJD
!ry^rf{g
IN J9/~
Best Copy
-table
~l
,
.
0)
UAJrr 6Dl-- - ~ 0 1/ f?:f~~)
oN
-~ '
~I/- ~ fi87f a'P (fgLc
fA -
U~p -j (Z.e:tJtrL dd\J l<;tr fCI>>f 1 /1;6u u
(j)Jl ($
'-~~
r- 7itfJO PJ'VA1r1-: ~~.V ~ ~.
j fOl2- lJug lFfe-.S.5 r () / 6iJZ? Best CO~y
Available
I dUJ, ~ io {Q () ~f;!~~J!;;j~
, LCO.. ( 1_' I. L [~ '~ .~ <~ $
~ l^A-~ v,~~~ {YLc,{- fIle-~6?~-A
6-h~ ~__(/~ 16' 1- l S ( ~ vu
/ {
I ( . - flA P1NLfD~> - 9U ~
hVlt-
I{)/[ (jJ)1vv 1 ~ ~ '00 ~CiMYt w /Cj.OcL
;~11 - ~p';f\fln!)\j TV ~~ (A:PJ<.,
It {J mr~ fblt ~7 6/J / ~1((fC (~{ 1/~ ~ tlJlUb
I
;0 ~ --. IflM ~
Nl~
c; 5 OUN
GjNrJJ l)/Llv/& /dlCk{ aJ
(~W(\- M/fb
\\,
.
':i
,
o;-2~()3
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
l. _
"
/ q u (J4;u\ {} II'-y,,^/
15,000 SF f!j~tJrrt?lI1I[~;.:Z.ANtfl~,5f~
184,800 SF~ITS 15098 DU/ACRE
37,540 SF t ~'Vl4.J'}I(QU ~A-
fi.~ f~~
OPTION A OPTION B
0* 0*
15 PER UNIT 219 219
219 219
(321) 282
102 63 (39 LESS)
USAGE
RETAIL AT STREET LEVEL
CONDOMINIUMS
COMMON AREA
PARKING
RETAIL
CONDOMINIUMS
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED
PARKING PROVIDED
SURPLUS
PROPERTY AREA 42,124 SF =
PROJECT AREA
FAR
APPROX BUILDING HEIGHT
967 ACRES
215,500 SF
5 12
c~ J~t>1 ILtlf:; I
* PER AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
'~
2r4ftJ
Kf S
~
130
I crfo
L--~
-- . 'v
'1 / ~ 0
Station Square (Iearwater
25 Se!lt~ml1H 2003
, ,
i ",
2
LEVEL I'SUMMARY
RET AI L.
SMALL SHOPS 4.840 SF
RESTAURANT 4.600 SF
MEZZANINE 5.560 SF
TOTAL RETAIL 15,000 SF
S.,.. COMMON AREA 2,180 SF
Ji~
~.,.. PARKING 35 SPACES
--
, ON-GRADE I
, PARKING I
I a..
::J
a..
I:
~
Best Copy
Available
( 1
STATION
SQUARE
PARK
RETAIL
1320 SF
MECHI
ELEC
,
,
RESTAURANT
4600 SF
RETAIL
3520 SF
EXISTING
POST OFFICE
Station Square Clearwater
:Ui SeptemHr 2003
.' -
'"
.
LEVEL 2 SUMMARY
3
COMMON AREA
640 SF
PARKING
71 SPACES
0-
::l
0-
I:
~
z
o
0-
I:
~
1 1
CLEVELAND STREET
Station Square (Iearwater
2.5 Septemher Z003
,J
-
LEVELS 3-5 SUMMARY
COMMON AREA
PARKING LEVEL 3
PARKING LEVEL 4
PARKING LEVEL 5
a..
:J
a..
:L
~
z
o
a..
:L
~
11 ~ {/ sf:.,; 7 if/tit Ill??
CLEVELAND STREET
\ ~~ Il....
4
640 SF/LEVEL I .920 SF
(
72 SPACES
72 SPACES
71 SPACES
POOL SPACE
ON LEVEL 5
~~ '
D-
1)1
Station Square (Iearwater
25 SeptemhH 2003
" - - - -~ ~
- 5
LEVELS 6-11 SUMMARY
-'
UNIT TYPE AREA # TOTAL AREA
A-I BRlI BA STUDIO 800 SF 36 28,800 SF
B-IBRlIBA W/ DEN 1,100 SF 36 39,600 SF
C-2BRl2BA 1,300 SF 54 70,200 SF
TOTALS 126 138,600 SF
COMMON AREA 4, 100 SF/LEVEL 24,600 SF
C
B
B
C
A
B C
JC A
-.
~ A [JY<f< [WiD
~C ~~Dr
~ A
I
I A
Ic
B C
A
C
B
B
C
CLEVELAND STREET
Station Square (Iearwater
25 Septemher Z003
, t _
- 6
PENTHOUSE LEVELS 12 & 14 SUMMARY
~~ UNIT TYPE AREA # TOTAL AREA
PI 1,600 SF 4 6,400 SF
~JV' P2 2,400 SF 8 19,200 SF
P3 2,400 SF 4 9,600 SF
\~~ P4 2,750 SF 4 11,000 SF
TOTALS 20 46,200 SF
COMMON AREA 4, 100 SF/LEVEL 8,200 SF
P2
P2
P4
P3
PI
PI
P4
P3
P2
P2
CLEVELAND STREET
Station Square (Iearwater
25 Septemher 2003
1. "
Ji\' J
.':J I \J{ ~. v;
'( qIY ~ JI..J. vY.. nD
'f.,)4~ T ' (Y'
~\r );~O\) ~;1 j~
'fJ\~ J"
/:Y~
~chan~
c\~ I
tV \ 0..> i.p
'A10';' \ \
\ "r' l "'-
I / \: l..e .1
\...
,
.
dL^-'
, /
Lavell"
131
UV6114
13.
~~elt2
1~~eJ12___
~1
110' -
~;~elll_
~ll0___
level 10
lW--
~-"'t1 "<?,<" ","'-' '4~
"0- \-~~{,:~:J;'
;.....'" >1 I""
-=-~_ ~2,,": 'l
~'4 f"~ '<-0 -.,-
n~ "'" !.........1;,~ ..... -t. --/
!i~"' ~-<< Zl/:~ -,,)%'X~"'7"./ft
;i ltr~~{',r~:
~-l ~:?
~~61~;~.
_ c./ ~ . /\lC" V 0
\.~ flr-"':
lavelS
911
levefS
""
Level 8
-
"""".
-
...,el7
7U
l8'val7
1a
-^
~tl$6__
luvel6
;w-
levelS
..,
~ef5
Parking
levd4
W-
Patktng
Parl<lng
~el4
Level 3
3U
Parkmg
Pal1<1ng
lSllel3
au
L.wol2
W---
ParkUlg
Parking
~el2
",-
Retail
Retail
--:.-
level I
a-
UtYoIl
a---
SECTIO'NAt
(OPTI~N A ::/LEVElAND STREET
~
..,.......
f;t~0
frit/~z..?c:; p
(q 2. I
t 1& 'tWChMt '
15'$ - IC.&It~r-
~ECTlON AT Cl
,OPTION B EVELAND STREET
."."..--:,
iC>d~"" i4'
4 l JA#" (.vl
t lJJ ~
~
......
q.- a0-(J~
rnM ~G
~
.
(
Proposed Term Sheet for Station Square Development Agreement
(p !-~ -' 1\..Ucl, ~ l~ tL ~)
? h.ft4-11A:.l 1/\ lJ.X, ~ a ~ A ;~
Zoning Approval for 140 c ndo units, 15,000 S'F-ofretcm-spaee and a 350 ca{"'-'\..l~,
plJ~I~~ ~ ~ io ~ ~Q; UbI'1& ~f~
land Use Agreement conditioned on the County approving land use consistent 1:3
with the above zoning
Parking The City will buy 100 parking spaces @ $12,500 each f(l,CSVf CYO)
<:-slt?r-d' Iv,~
Simultaneous Close' The City will allow us to close on the land by paYing With a $720,000 ~
subordinated non-Interest beanng note repayable at the time the City ~
pays us for the parking spaces
TIFF The City & County wlllfu;y.~~f~ of t~:-en~al~y
. -1'1 & County's share of th~n.tiaGated property taxes for the next 10
Od^:'~~~_yea:rs based on the tax Increment created by the project This money '^' .-
D will be used for landscaping and Infrastructure Improvements cJ( r-~
~[
Enterpnse Zone The City will help us secure from the State a sales tax credit on
construction matenals used In the project and any other State or
Federal assistance that may be available
Fees
The City will either waive or pay for the following fees
· Transportation Impact fees
· Sewer Impact fees
_~YVill-ruJ !~
Improvements
---SChoohmpact fe-es-
· Water & sewer tap fees
· Fire line connection fees
~-pfan -review fees --'-.
~--- -----'
. BUlld~g permit fees < (:P~(~Yl1V>J:
e~e!Ql?ment fe.es~ ? ~ vt-W -Z..treA (A a. ~
-T ).- f'p~"^ ~ 71 .
City will ~Imburse us for utility and Infrastructure Improvements ( ljtl ()/'~ ~~J
required by any relevant junsdlctlon. ~U
(?J vLr\ <t-uV ~d U~~ ~ hJG
vGf~&d )
Owens, Reginald W.
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
r
Mahony, Thomas
Thursday, September 25,2003947 AM
Barrett, Earl
Owens, Reginald W
RE Station Sq
(uP~
lo/~lo~
The areas calculated from the cad files are ~
6485 SF ff)(lot 11 block 19 C1tS>JnfQ ~f I k:::::
(42,365 for lots 4-11 and tne west 2 feet .. ~ -1D11\t- SCTf2-
If you want this on the sealed survey this will have to come from the surveyor who sign and sealed
them That might require a small fee This should have been conveyed to the person who ordered the
surveys to begin with
Tom Mahony, PSM
PW A/Engineering
City of Clearwater
727-562-4762
-----Onglnal Message-----
From' Barrett, Earl
Sent Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12 33 PM
To Mahony, Thomas
Cc Owens, Reginald W
Subject FW Station Sq
Tom -
Can you provide these calculations for Reg?
-----Onglnal Message-----
From' Owens, Reginald W
Sent. Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12 05 PM
To: Barrett, Earl
Subject. Station Sq
Earl
~
~
K
Ltt..~ ?0 S L()~
_ &; crB5 ~-o
1:;t/} 8 e 0 C(f'1
( C;; 1. tei---
Could you please check with the engineers and see If they can provide us with a total square foot measurement for each
of the two surveys they did - shown on a sealed drawlng{s) would be preferable
Thanks
1
~
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent:
To
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10 45 AM
Fierce, Lisa, Gerlock, Frank, Clayton, Gina
FW Station Square surveys
fy1-survey for Beck
Cyndl TarapaOl
Planrung Dttector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From' Owens, Reginald W
Sent Tuesday, September 23,2003 1031 AM
To. Harriger, Sandy
Ce: Tarapam, Cyndl, Arasteh, Mahshld, Akin, Pam
SubJect: FW Station Square surveys
We have received, and have forwarded to Beck, the surveys of the two properties
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Barrett, Earl
Sent Monday, September 22, 2003 9 51 AM
To Owens, Reginald W
Ce. Mahony, Thomas, Harriger, Sandy
SubJect Station Square surveys
Reg -
Under copy of this message I Will be forwarding three Signed & sealed onglnal survey drawings of each of the follOWing
received today
. Twenty-scale drawing of Parking Lot 18 With adjoining Tone 40 Ltd (Cassano) Lot 11 Included
. Separate twenty-scale drawing of Tone 40 Ltd (Cassano) Lot 11 You Will note the drawing Identifies property
Improvements for this parcel encroaching onto both Cleveland Street R/W and Into City parking lot
I Will prOVide a copy of each survey to Tom Mahony for his reView, along With a digital file on disk I Will send you the Eagle
Consultants inVOice #03-390 In the amount of $1,150 and request that you have Sandy process for payment Give me a
call me at 4754 If you have further questions
1
Fierce, Lisa
From'
Sent.
To.
Cc
Subject
Arasteh, Mahshld
Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9 48 AM
Tarapam, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina
QUillen, Michael
FW Station Square
FYI Thanks Mike
Mahshid D. Arasteh, P.E.
Pubhc Works AdminIstrator
100 S. Myrtle Ave. #220
Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone. (727)562-4757, Fax' (727)562-4755
-----Onglnal Message-----
From QUillen, Michael
Sent Monday, September 15, 2003 4 18 PM
To. Arasteh, Mahshld
Subject: Station Square
Storm water
a Attenuatlon- We are requesting payment In lieu of providing on-site stormwater attenuation per Community
Development Code section 3-914 (A) ThiS IS tYPically used as a development incentive when on-site attenuation would be
Impractical because of the size of the property or other site related conditions The payment amount IS not arbitrary, It IS
calculated by the developer's engineer based on what size pond would have been needed & the appraised property value
ThiS IS a perfect location to use It because the site does not lend Itself to a pond, but discharges to an undersized storm
sewer system We have plans to upgrade the system and these funds will offset some of the cost of the upgrade
b Retentlon- retention requirements can be met by the use of 011/ grease separators on the discharge from the parking
garage
TraffiC Policy IS to require traffic studies on developments exceeding 100 tnps/hr or 1000 tnps/day It IS unknown what
the tnp generation from thiS project will be until the non-residential uses are detailed Recognizing the bndge will be
removing traffiC from Cleveland St , we will work With the developer to determine the level of study needed
I will investigate to determine whether the above Items are reasonable to add to the site plan application form
I
~
Plannmg Depm'__-vnt Comments on StatIon Square InfIh JJect - 9-16-03
Benefits
. Restaurant and retail on fust floor
Objective 1 F of People Goal- Cleveland Street shall be mamtamed as downtown's mam
street WhICh IS valued both for ItS hIstonc character and scale of development and for ItS
functIOn as the maJor retaIl street
· ProvIdes resIdential use
DIstnct VlSlon Use - A key component of the downtown core IS to attract resIdential uses
WIth a vanety of housmg types and pnces
. Access on Laura Street only
PolIcy 7 of Downtown Core - To ensure a pedestnan-fnendly and safe enVIronment,
dnveways shall be dIscouraged on Cleveland Street between Myrtle and Osceola Avenues
· Some pedestnan elements prOVIded mcludmg comer balcomes that read as stepbacks, awnmgs at
human scale (and on thIrd floor), real wmdows and louvers m buffenng the garage opemngs, and
covered fIrst floor walk area
. Some elements of contextual archItectural deSIgn are provIded mcludmg details WIth honzontal
features, symmetncal deSIgn and neutral bUIldmg colors/bnghter accents
· Access to bUIldmg/retaIl/restaurant provIded on the fIrst floor (SImIlar to other bUIldmgs on Cleveland
Street)
. SWImmmg pool for resIdents provIded
PolIcy 19 of overall Downtown Plan - ResIdential development shall provIde appropnate on
SIte recreatIOn facIlIties based on the scale of the proJect
Challenges
· ProvIde Improved relatIOnshIp to the Post OffIce and other hIstonc bUIldmgs m scale, matenals, etc
PolIcy 8 of Downtown Core - Redevelopment and new constructIOn along Cleveland Street
shall be compatible WIth and contnbute to pedestnan vItalIty, human scale and hIstonc fabnc,
Downtown Core DIstnct VlSlon (Development Patterns) - New constructIOn and
redevelopment along Cleveland Street must respect and be mtegrated WIth the eXIstmg
predommant hIstonc bUIldmg, heIght and scale patterns EstablIshed bUIldmg rhythms,
setbacks, and scale along the block should be mamtamed and remforced WIth new
constructIOn Proposed bUIldmgs m excess of the establIshed hIstonc heIght must be stepped
back from Cleveland Street so the addItional heIght mamtams a streetscape that preserves a
human scale
. HeIght should stepback one foot for every two feet over predommant block heIght
See PolIcy 8 and Downtown Core DIstnct VISIOn above
· ArchItecture IS very boxy m deSIgn (too mImmalIstIc for context of Cleveland Street) - needs to
mclude a vanety of deSIgn elements
Amemty Goal. Ob1ectIve 3 D - Redevelopment IS encouraged to create a VIbrant downtown
enVIronment contaImng a vanety of bUIldmg forms and styles that respect downtown's
character and hentage
. DeSIgn needs progreSSIOn of dIstmctIve features WIth clearly noted bUIldmg base, mIddle floors and
bUIldmg cap/roof lIne, need emphasIs of "front door" along Cleveland Street, wmdow pattern should
be dIfferentiated, top center pIece IS out of context WIth overall deSIgn, further honzontal emphasIs IS
needed
Amemty Goal. Ob1ectIve 3 D - Redevelopment IS encouraged to create a VIbrant downtown
enVIronment contammg a vanety of bUIldmg forms and styles that respect downtown's
character and hentage
· Concern regardmg VIabIlIty of retail space to near garage
S \Planmng DepartmentIDOWNTOWN PLAN IMPLEMENTATIOMStatzon Square Infill ProJecfIPlanmng Department Comments on StatIOn Square Infill
Project doc
1
· Relationships between new and existing buildings
shall be evident in the height and design.
· Stepping back the stories of buildings can reduce the
apparent scale of the building and establish a "base"
and a "top".
· At the predominant height of buildings on the block
the proposed building shall be stepped back a
distance equal to that predominant height.
· Additional stepbacks from that predominant height to
the maximum building are still being studied.
I.,.
~ ~I r: .
~,...{ b -V ~ Plannm nt Comments on StatIOn S uare InfI e~ct - 9-16-03 , ~
Benefits ~-
· Restaurant and retail on fIrst floor ~ ~ f2 _It,
Objective 1 F of People Goal- Cleveland Street shall be maIntamed as downtown's mam ~
street WhICh IS valued both for ItS hIstonc character and scale of development and for Its
functIOn as the maJor retail street
. ProVIdes reSIdential use
DIstnct VlSlon Use - A key component of the downtown core IS to attract reSIdential uses
wIth a vanety of housmg types and pnces
. Access on Laura Street only
PolIcy 7 of Downtown Core - To ensure a pedestnan-fnendly and safe envIronment,
dnveways shall be dIscouraged on Cleveland Street between Myrtle and Osceola Avenues
· Some pedestnan elements proVIded mcludmg corner balcomes that read as stepbacks, awnmgs at
human scale (and on thIrd floor), real wmdows and louvers m buffenng the garage openmgs, and
covered fIrst floor walk area
· Some elements of contextual archItectural desIgn are proVIded mcludmg details wIth honzontal
features, symmetncal desIgn and neutral bUIldmg colors/bnghter accents
· Access to bUIldmg/retaIl/restaurant proVIded on the fIrst floor (sImIlar to other bUIldmgs on Cleveland
Street)
. SWImmmg pool for reSIdents proVIded
PolIcy 19 of overall Downtown Plan - ResIdentlal development shall proVIde appropnate on
sIte recreatIOn facIlIties based on the scale of the project
Challenges
. ProVIde Improved relatIOnshIp to the Post OffIce and other hIstonc bUIldmgs m scale, matenals, etc
PolIcy 8 of Downtown Core - Redevelopment and new constructIOn along Cleveland Street
shall be compatible wIth and contnbute to pedestnan VItalIty, human scale and hIstonc fabnc,
-"'Downtown Core DIstnct VIsIon (Development Patterns) - New constructIOn and
redevelopment along Cleveland Street must respect and be mtegrated wIth the eXIstmg
(} t predommant hIstonc bUIldmg, heIght and scale patterns EstablIshed bUIldmg rhythms,
\\ l:Y setbacks, and scale along the block should be mamtaIned and remforced wIth new
)~/iJP' constructIOn Proposed bUIldmgs m excess of the establIshed hIstonc heIght must be stepped
r v"- '~\Y J::;~ back from Cleveland Street so the addItional heIght mamtaIns a streetscape that preserves a
\.; (Y' I'fF human scale
. HeIght should stepback one foot for every two feet over predommant block heIght
See PolIcy 8 and Downtown Core DIstnct VISIOn above
· ArchItecture IS very boxy m deSIgn (too mmImalIstlc for context of Cleveland Street) - needs to
mclude a vanety of deSIgn elements
Amemty GoaL Objective 3 D - Redevelopment IS encouraged to create a VIbrant downtown
enVIronment contaImng a vanety of bUIldmg forms and styles that respect downtown's
character and hentage
· DeSIgn needs progreSSIOn of dIstmctIve features WIth clearly noted bUIldmg base, mIddle floors and
bUIldmg cap/roof lIne, need emphasIs of "front door" along Cleveland Street, wmdow pattern should
be dIfferentiated, top center pIece IS out of context WIth overall deSIgn, further honzontal emphasIs IS
needed
Amemty GoaL Objective 3 D - Redevelopment IS encouraged to create a VIbrant downtown
enVIronment contammg a vanety of bUIldmg forms and styles that respect downtown's
character and hentage
· Concern regardmg VIabIlIty of retail space to near garage
S \Planmng DepartmenNJOWNTOWN PLAN IMPLEMENTATIOMStatlOn Square Infill ProJecf\Plannmg Department Comments on StatIOn Square Infzll
Project doc
~
.
.
· Relationships between new and existing buildings
shall be evident in the height and design.
· Stepping back the stories of buildings can reduce the
apparent scale of the building and establish a "base"
and a "top".
· At the predominant height of buildings on the block
the proposed building shall be stepped back a
distance equal to that predominant height.
· Additional stepbacks from that predominant height to
the maximum building are still being studied.
-- ,
, ,
II Sep 15 03
I, SeD 15
.,
ft-lb /O~
1.l2:42p B~
,003 10 15~~1 E STUDIO ARCHITECTS
~ttll~ fV/~
DE'i'ELOPMENT SUMMARY
81~7 2901
WI' No 1903
USAC E.
RETA'LAT STREET LEVEL
CONDOMINIUMS
COMI1i'N AREA
PARKI~~
RETAIL
CON[)()MINIUMS
TOTAL ~ARKING REQUIRED
PARKI'II.::2 PROVIDED
SURPL US
PROPf RlY AREA
PROJE:T AREA
FAR:
APPRC'X BUILDING HEIGHT-
15.000 SF
171.400 SFJI42 UNITS
29,IOOSF
146 85 OUt t\CRE
I 5 PER UNIT
O.
213
213
337
124
42./24 SF =
967 ACRES
215.500 SF
5.12
lBO'
;Ii PER )\C REEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
.;
arwa
.11
p.2
2/7
\~ c/
Sep ::p ~~ ~'~O:3 4~r 15 \11 Oil STUD I 0 AR CH I TE CTS
,
J
I ~,
t :
I ,
I j
r i-
f ,
j~~.
IlINlN :;
t I
KJ~
.. .
l~.- i~
CLEVELAND STltEET
(AI
lJ~AI
$.,..
II ~ ~ .,..
n
fIJ
ON.GRADE
PARKING
I
I
RETAIL
1840 SF
RESTAURANT
4760 SF
RETAil
t 380 SF
81~r7 2901
... No 1903
LEVEL I SU' 'MARY
RETAIL:
SMALL SHOPS
RESTAURANT
MEZZANINE
TOTAL RETAIL
COMMON AREA
PARKING
=:=J
Q..
:>
c....
L
~
MEeHl
ELEC
RETAil
2200 Sf
LOGGIA ti P
--fi.J1.ft.ft-W__._.! .rt
-
.;
I
j 0 n 'S Qua r e (I
1:1 ,epl~lII!iP,r 200:1
I I
. .11
p.3
3/7
s. ~o SF
4. .0 SF
4, 'OSF
I! '00 SF
2, OSF
16 PACES
-- -
Sep, ~:p ~~ :1~O:3 4~; 16MI B~ STUD I 0 ARCH ITE CTS
PUBliC ACCESS t
-~O F ,\RKING
DEe,
81.'1 2~01
No 1903
m1:L 2 SUMMAI tY
COl'1MON MEA
PARKING
Uill
CLEVELAND STIREET
1.1
earwa
I,IV',F
80 SP.4C
0..
:>
~
z
c
~
.11
p.4
4/7
Sep, 15 03 .12: 43p .
Sep 15 00310.164" BE STUDIO ARCHITECTS
POOl SPACE
ON LI;veLs-.....
PlJBlK' ACCESS
TO P.A'tKJNG
DeCK
, I
I
.
813 38'1 2901
.
L~'ELS 3.5 SUMr-IARY
.
No 1903
CO,..'MON AREA
PARlC1NG LEVElJ
PARI< ING LEVEL 4
PARI<JNG LEVELS
Q..
;:)
Q.
1:
~
~
It.
~
~
ill1J
CLEVELAND STREET
..1
ion ~Quare (I
1,-1 Sr[lll'mDrl .!.uu~
ill'Wat
.11
p.5
5/7
J.12f1~F/ :vel 3.360SF
74 SfA:1
74 SF A :1
73 SF A,':E
Sep 15 03 12: 44p B~
Sep,15 '003 10'IEAI~ - RN STUDIO ARCHITECTS
pOOL AND
ROOF GARDEN
AT LEVEL 6
BELOW
1....
/1'
I
]~j
81~'1 2901
.. No 1903
LEVElS 6.14 SUMMAI tY
p.s
6/7
UNIT TYP s. ~6. 11.. TOTAL~
A-I BRt/ E:A STUDIO 800 SF 3t 28.800 SF
B-IBR;II!A WIDEN I,ICOSF 3t 39,600 SF
C-2BRI2EA 1,3(0 SF 50< 70.200 SF
TOTALS. /26 138,600 SF
COMMON AREA 2.04) SF/LEVEL 18.360 SF
c
c
A
c
A
B
B
B
8
1
eLf. VEL AND STilt E E T
I.~
I
Ion :S qua r e (I
, t"\ \ C D [ t m her ~ 0 () .:
'.11
. Sep 15 03 '12: 44p B~
.)e~ I~ ,UUJ 10 17A1~ IIIIIN STUDIO ARCHITECTS
_ 81.<1 _ 2901
No.1903
p.?
7/7
PENTHC)USE LEVELS 15-16 SUM''L\t ,
UNIT TYP!:" ~~ t!. TOTAlA~
PI 1.60 ) SF 8 /2.800 SF
P2 2,401) Sf 4 9.600 SF
P3 2.601' SF 4 10Aoo SF
TOTALS- 16 12.800 SF
COMMON /\REA 2.04C SF/LEVEL ~ 080 SF
'I
P3
PI
PI
P2
P2
PI
PI
P3
CLEVELAND STRI:ET
o n s: qua r e (I e
I
!I ~ ) t' n I e m !1 C' I ~ (I (I J
"I
arwat
.,1
PIW\ ! W4t I ~ {;(.J f1f ( HMfJr 6IH(Cl~ I /{frJflO(ftp.f' /(ltLfbf
~(cf
C( loolutD frJlL,
Uil't
CN\
fA\rLtS~ b1fr
Uvv\ 1'11') ~
IfJBu~
u.J. ,t( 1l2:cr
I C S A1 D () lC 1- ~A) ffZerM
I ,) (J-;> I ~{ ~1 \CJf, ()y/ ~~ - ~1tLl'J ~T) Oil () f 1 fu)\) L
t1 vL ( , rU~~N ~~ P}W1 G
M 1J\Z-J U ~e~ ~t ~{N u
\
~A L
P,Pw~ (
Iflerl P&i rw /vi f
.,
q --It--o,? ~7[liP(1\j 12v)h21t ~L- nl~JB('C
t$U IW Ill))) 2. {)~i),Al/vTl/vJ0 -, ~~U OTZ1rf7 lA-t0 6V fl-cb
u
cJ I'\J AvoN
+
o
.;J
/0 tZs( 1f1~2-
(:;..
~(-
c~1Jvtsi
Best-eopy
Available
Jv TVWN 1/ PLAN ~
r)~ tJfnrJNS 812-
[00 I 1
t1
oj 7ub i'1 ulL l-t ()l_
,=, tJ ~ I I~ (Z;({f--r?'--17_
u ND - !ZeLA17 () }',Y]1"l
It
~
c (
NE::-
CJfZ:S,t MI
Q
'-.S-l P
- \ I
<J NINl)JW e~z .
~(~ A1~ L"i,) 111J-
CMe: s
~
l'
#l ;J~cY JJ4:
q ~i.tis4isv ~
[07~
.,., -~
.
.....
'17117cN :;~()~ (AJnlC RUJ~
LR ~ '(I {9c- m. f.;l-IlEP I U~ i &b~uJil fVl4 ';(17 of /111ftf6,~ ~~
1\~I)ll
/ 1~~1~
M A L'JftN( 8)YYl P7Hl ~
WI meAl OJ\) Tellm~ ~15 JS
Of;V~, P&f.~ u.L ~ C{ZA (}IJL-Y fuJJr (' c..
\(L!(;lu' ~ 17 r{b (CJJv~t yv) lei D
1\1 AzZel 1+ () ~ )
0)21 E~~~ l1S(~ 10 ~7 -'+ '77TIet~
UJf\1\ ~~ ftND~ {~IZ/yltL 1&111b ~
7
.
.
f' ~
f\-\ '
f1'(lfb I
q -\01J0
)? fr,(l.f z,{ l--
s 8:?D - \ D?JO
<:; ~?1 Z7? (Y1 ~ ?
UJ
-
t Copy
Available
.
.
1.."'''' }.
l~GltfI6S (S{7!t p[A:^l t 1tn1~;J/rrffg
- D 1f.+ ~ :5 C/~6
z/0 C4::t3
}D(lL1-t~ 0 -- rlM rP~
(2Abf1b~o~ Q)"\j S 11S
UI177 u^' a~
~) ~~~ 1~0
r:orJ€ r~c.
I/orur - ~
o Cl/ ~r7 Nb 5lJ 'lli]~j ~ ONr!/ p~_ vV
U PD ~n;f~b ~qq' PK9 L/)) SU /2-0{;?'(
P~kJ0
,..
I ~iDN(<\ lM J'J~rolV\g fttm= ~ TO ~
~ ~~Lw0
~ <n OOf\L ~S?,
ND1 ~s ~~{) '. ~N<I VVl~ ({\/fbJi6F
@;\)~ ~. _~11~~ OON ~~ .
~ QPi~ - fgu~6 -10 <&fllfYlWvl ~\J(J\j
f LNl ~~ flGON' M ~ - ~ Nt)'\ 11tr~'t
Best Copy
AvaiUible
.
AGENDA
STATION SQUARE REDEVELOPMENT
QUICK RESPONSE TEAM MEETING
September 10, 2003
1. Presentation by Beck of proposed Project Site/Building
Design Requirements.
2. Site Plan/Building Design Issues to Address.
3. Public Works/Engineering Issues to Address (including
need for a Traffic Impact Analysis).
4. Development Agreement Issues/Schedule.
5. Project Submittal/Review/Approval Schedule.
~
.
,
.
t
(v --- ~(.e.-
tJUL
~- ~V\Ll ~ ~ ~~
Best Copy
vaffii6le
~'cV
~tL~
~ \Louo-~~
~Il~ I\Q.. ~<> ~ -;-/-;: ~Jc "rL-
~~L\~mMJ~ - ~ "11: 'W~ VlueJ/),J ~~-
-~naf (ly~~tao~~61J1~ ?
J22)(~Cf;, ~\R> ~ t!:k9-tro&O ~ -
+ ,. /J n _ "'_ ()
(!LCal ur-oxUt~
(OQ - - _V::lCll1& ~o.~
11 1-7P OlIO ,S'1JlJt1 of' IDJdo-r~
~ ~
~~do ~ ~ two -eaJ~ - b Coedl(olJ~ f1-\;Jai1ts_
2.:t.'7/> 00 IDtb - LLQ Q l ( \ U\.-J.e, 11_[110 (.lJl1\dW)
V(~.~ ~W~~~OW 7. ;'OO1S/lCJU
nfhLJ~/-D_()}J1-_tl_~1-dv.( 6 Best COJ'Y
~-l-l '0 f Availao1e
- . ~~Q~t{aQ - ~ o.c:cO ((JJD.wod-2I{)f16e--
.CJnJ& (WtJ1~ tJ~~!L
:kuCtcl
.
2
~ (rotaf ~~$ Ar1tl i- 4~ .
Z m~<i~~ ,,- wJt <:J.:~t1-:00 {~ ad
-/)t~.d~ . - fif1'l.L
t, ~~~D ' --' ftL, <L td:~-n
~'1fA~ ~~
.
.
3
z. (Qu.eP.~ ~
.
.
- 4-
u~ ~s. ~JDvO~ ~
- pttmvLli f--{JfJ.ilry2Y- ~
Wa9tskfiltJaf UlLlJ.--~- W_11O-~-
~ ~ ~ /:.. .
QJQ v~ - tf41f- - '=ft1at
t~~iol:. dllliJLLm - - tQCJ (tf'Yt.AL~ -.:.
_v.1l.ULev\0V&k (d~ ~Gtt~_
_ fN\~ rw.J ~av~Jl~~6
l:t: ~
boi~ UdLAJ ~ ~ i M? bJf ~llt
_ _lli. c1C3
~_ _ W~~~ 1r.(~
OYGVIL(L~\l~ -e --'S1~Jt~ 1-;:-, ,
~ rociprliL lWJI1A6 fllliJ1d ~ wll?;i;i
'7 - -cL
-- W_~~ ~jQ ~ttldtfJ/tt~ cp
a.~ fLlacL iLG - - .
-!t ~ u4----rl/ _=P-u~-~~ 1
-i-(:) ~ s, ~ - - a. :!JJ:QY:L a- rfL 7t-~
-1~ - -~~-01.Dc:;rd _:-jlJdk- (~r'W~
Q1l6:tclM1. ~~
~_ ~ em 'L fi-u~ ~-~
.
.
-6-
.
.
-lQ-
~
-7 S'l~~ -\~LW~:t~\ (\ ~ ~f\L&(p6<fu&
- ~ w 00 \1 _
~~\;~,~ ~ _JVY1L ~hJY(
~.t ~ V1\J W~_tlV_~~ \~
~cr ~Jl~
- STId:lCtLSWa r-V
~ ~ tJ::V6. S~~4t~~&--==lJl~ .
~- ~m~->-aI'L -~-~-.D -;/;;,
-'<'F= OOW-. -- - w( ~a~~-$-dL5_W5 ~
...
Ma.~~C!uf-;l-- _6icl1__Lc:~iL~..J:1(tlCL'
:&sw.~~J: - 0iJr/~.sJ.LJ1,Jlgh
-^~J~- ~ -71 ~
eii-;;v.-G ~ Vt1(L{~~ S_U~I_UJQ_- --
~~ ~A_~~~d--i?---- -~
()J1iJLSJ
ees{"copy
Available
~
.
AGENDA
STATION SQUARE REDEVELOPMENT
QUICK RESPONSE TEAM MEETING
September 10, 2003
1. Presentation by Beck of proposed Project Site/Building
Design Requirements.
2. Site Plan/Building Design Issues to Address.
3. Public Works/Engineering Issues to Address (including
need for a Traffic Impact Analysis).
4. Development Agreement Issues/Schedule.
5. Project Submittal/Review/Approval Schedule.
~
Fierce, Lisa
From.
Sent.
To
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Wednesday, September 03,20031027 AM
Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina, Gerlock, Frank
FW Station Square/Seck ProJect
Importance
High
I wanted you all to have thIS but not sure exacdy what It means ill terms of how the SIte plan will be revIewed I will
let you know when I find out Thanks
Cyndl Tarapam
Planrung Dtrector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Horne, Bill
Sent. Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5 02 PM
To: Stone, Ralph, Brumback, Garry, Owens, Reginald W , Tarapam, Cyndl, Arasteh, Mahshld, QUillen, Michael, Akin, Pam, Simmons,
Margie, Matthews, Douglas E
SubJect: Station Square/Beck Project
Importance. High
To QUick Response Team Members
In order to move the Station Square project forward as expeditiously as pOSSible, I want the QRT to schedule bl-monthly
meetings with the developers, I suggest a half hour of staff time pnor to a one hour meeting If the QRT finds that more
time IS necessary with the developer that can be scheduled I am requesting Ralph Stone to "Chair" these meetings and at
the conclUSion of each meeting the QRT and the developer should establish an agenda for the next meeting If either the
developer or a QRT member wants to add Items after the meeting they need to coordinate with Ralph
The first meeting Will be September 10 In the large CM conference room at 8 30 and the developer Will JOin the QRT at am
The agenda for the first meeting Will be as follows
Public works/englneenng Issues
2 Site Pian/DeSign Issues
3 Development Agreement Issues
4 Application Approvals and Schedules
Sill Horne
1
".'
,
.
Fierce, Lisa
Subject
Location
CT, LF, GC, FG, MP & Bnan Murphy re Station Square project
216
Start
End
Thu 8/21/200310 00 AM
Thu 8/21/2003 12 00 PM
Recurrence
(none)
Required Attendees
Accepted
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina, Parry, Mark, Gerlock, Frank
Meetmg Status
Conftrmed 10 30 w / Bnan
ah 081403
I am askmg Angel to coordmate a meet:lng w1th Beck representative Bnan Murphy and ills arcilltect to begm
d1scuss1ons on Station Square project Br1an md1cated that they were available Thursday mormng and all day Fr1day
He 1S not available Wed I see by the schedule that FrIday 1S the mterv1ews So Angel, we have made tlus hard-not
a lot of cholCes I would really apprec1ate 1t you all would rearrange your schedules to accommodate them
Thursday Apparendy, Br1an 1S not available the next week as he 1S gomg on vacation
Angel-please schedule 1/2 hour before they arrlve for mternal d1scuss1on Then we will probably need at least 1
and 1/2 hours for meet:lng Thanks Please get tlus orgaruzed no later than tomorrow and call Bnan to let hun
know If any problems, let me know
Bnan Murphy at Beck 813-282-3900
Cyndl Tarapam
Planmng D1!ector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl c~m ~ I J ( ~ I. ~ ~ / ~ 1/"\ btt~ III
l(0AK C(!Uf(It~lm/ttJ ~ l LMlt--t9 ~) L:lL(r0 "IV --~
~LM ~~ ~!clwtSctCj
w ~ ~ Ie AA.ce.n+Wv> r1-U
CM1 v.iU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~^r
Q~ d\~~\Ak -1 ~<;ltcJ ~ !tflYfff..:..~-::..~v:
Q ~~~ ( . \
~ fVO \'e.{;/~t::-I/- (-IS ~Li""\-J
oBt c(.:::;'" U
~ l'^ ~ c. L 0 c1v.J iJ..<.-
1
..
-'
.
B~ll J6?
r I ---~ - - -. .-- - - - -- -~ - -~ --~-=- - - - -.. --~.~----~ ---=- -- ~,<~. ~
_ ~ ? ~ __ ~ v ~lI:J6 ~ 6}\J~~_~_. ~ ~_ ~~~_~~_'_~~~=,~~~ ~
_ _ .........:;;;;::.. -=_ =_-.=r-=-.___ -...-._ -
.-~~=_-~~_-_-cf _ AA ~_ ~~- ~ _ Vtf0l'(; --~ WjJ~/!) ~
~---~-~~_ '=__ _,__~ OO~@,t2t)tJutJ ~ saW1C-_ ~~ ~ _ I~~lrNl ~
_-::.--x...~_ :;;J~_--=- __::;: _;r--.::>.- _......~ .....;: _...;_-~.: --...- -~ ~
_ .lr'='~- -~-_ ---:---.c -_ .:;:--.:;::;- \ -- -~ -=--:::;: -~ ~
-
,~ ~ _~~ "6WP6A:Ut,,:.,.. '" ') ~~ ~. ., ..' -, ~
'~_= _~_- ___ r .q .~__ flM ~(?1?1 _~.~_, - ~.__ _~____~___
~. ~,~-__ __--- _ _ _;- __-__-.~=~ ~ ___ _ _ _ ~ _~ ~=~~ - ~ ~_ - -.-_ _~T__.~_~_
. .,'u,' .~ JJf f~ l~ 4-N .~~) </t5I)U)T7t .
ro fVtl~==__'il~ - _ _ - --- -- - ,- - --~-~~---- --~ - "
. =L .-_ . _0' ~ ~ .~__ Pl)f1Uv f~. LV -~ ~.=- --~ -= -
.,'0c ~. '..~ ~r/~~~" ""n-~~ ='. ., '
__~=-=_____~~=~~ ~.=____ ~ J~t ~t?1~ \fJ. fngJJosep~__0._.~_ ~~
_:__~____~,'~~ _=-=-~_ ~f~ ~ .~ ~_ _
~"".L--=-~_ ~~~_~ _ _-_~~- -:;.... -_ ~ _ _____ =....:;:;'=\.:pI=~_=~ ..... _~ _ _ ~ -~ - ~.: --~ ---- -iL--=-_ --=-=--"- ..:-_-
"~~~~.-~.' ..," "-'~=-~~~.~~. , - ,.," e::l;c:,:'~-~.'", . .' -
..=-.::::;-:::::::;___.=_--=::.-~_-:- -=::;..-=-r-~- __ ....=__..::;;..::-~-~_~_ -'- - _~ _...z _~-"".=-~~~""'- -__ ",_,_ -. ...J.._
~~=~~~~~~~=- J ~~-~~~~{~-._lU fte c~ _~' fMt_ ~
_,,-"_~_ ~ _-C-~~_~_-. ~_~ -=~~ (~- (- ) : - -=~ ~-- - -- - --
~C.'._" r~ ..('g@...~ ~:-:?2~f.~~_ H:lO(2L.~
,-.==: _~~==~~_ liJjfJz~ ~ ~uY.- _ti1% f7Jl~ ~ ~ -. .J - - .
~~ _~_~ ~ ~ ~ ___~_-.:-~-c- -
. .. " .
'6/ Zl1)? - . ,
~? Cf_ uMY ~6N ~Z~ 1P f!J[;;~--
-f1~ ~ 112
~6&loo r(l-~3L[~tlr?r; ~i O&r~
~ ~ I (p ~ (CfrN ptuw f;Jp~ tw VlllYJf{ ~fJ.g:l__~~
1 <S r t?utVfl1l9!s C C ~ 1 HAftl?J/rl$<~,r){/'fffW4d?
~ U!rV11WA11Y1~\ _ ~_ _
/
---- ---=--
-..... -
/~ ?!tf!/f11Jt~?Zti fl~ , ~ . "
---
1~ -
~~~~7~~ I --
'--
~- .
NfUw 0JV {2Jnv1 ~ - .
~
,
- ~~
-"'J>-
.
-
'.
> .
-
ae.t Copy
Available
".
- -
-
-~
-
- --..
-~--
--- ~--
'-
l
-3-
/"
!Ioforto~ CMlY_lhdim ~ ~(V ~ n01-O Mu:.l1-=:
t~LliJ1 - , C'O A
~'104 BtLl~ ~_~rffi-?'
M ~ ~ · *loa" fN1 r;;-fC
~~M{floo:L ~~ ~ (Jt WL
~2v~ C1>t1~ ~~'IV gu~~
JIl-lU at., ~t:!rkd
l~u\dt0 $(..0 ~
?1J~~LlLa1:t
(2,_p~~~_~_CLL~ 2 f.cJR.dV()~ Ilttel )
&1~ttdf= ;J:i-;til u/v() & ~-;fL
~-LCL::7 ~~~ __~_~, vy\.J!,+ ~ yYJoYV
_ _ - wcint Jo~~ - - - - LL -10- _ tiYl!J . uJ(JI~
&u1Jo-yf~~ [Q1j-l %~~
...
G ---
~-~ -~s-s d_t; &/E!fA-J-
~o .. Quk ~~~ - fLtp-f-~~
~~
.~ S'U2vn'd:- ~. ~ t2Y1.u,oe~.eQ.I(fl\J r
D~ - Oc)-, ~ ~~t\ ~~ 3J\U\Jt
~-O-~ - O&JL-~ut;tC ~~_~ ~0
.
Clayton, Gina
From
Sent
To
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Friday, August 15, 2003 10 48 AM
Clayton. Gina
RE Dates
let's make the letter from Blll
thanks
Cyndl Tarapanl
Plannlng Dlrector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
-----Orlglnal Message-----
From Clayton, Glna
Sent Frlday, August 15, 2003 10 41 AM
To Tarapanl, Cyndl
SubJect FW Dates
-----Orlglnal Message-----
From Davld Walker [mallto dwalker@co plnellas fl us]
Sent Frlday, August 15, 2003 10 39 AM
To gclayton@clearwater-fl com
SubJect RE Dates
I would say from Admlnlstratlon - could be Ralph Stone
>>> "Clayton, Glna" <gclayton@clearwater-fl com> 08/15/03 10 36AM >>>
Who can send you the "formal letter"? Can lt be from the Plannlng
Department or should lt be from the Manager?
Regardlng the TIF request, what type of addltlonal lnformatlon to you
thlnk
we wlll have for that agenda ltem?
-----Orlglnal Message-----
From Davld Walker [mallto dwalker@co plnellas fl us]
Sent Frlday, August 15, 2003 9 18 AM
To gclayton@clearwater-fl com, Gordon Beardslee
SubJect RE Dates
Glna
Ironlcally, I was typlng you an emall addresslng thlS very lssue when
your emall popped up
I have requested that you submlt the Plans, etc on August 21st for
the
Redevelopment Plan to glve us tlme to reVlew and prepare our report to
County Admlnlstratlon (due on Sept 16th for the October 7th BCC
meetlng)
After the Clty has flrst readlng on the Plan on Sept
transmlt a "formal" request letter to Mr Spratt (we
lncorporate any addltlonal changes that may come out
CommlSSlon meetlng)
4th, please
wlll have tlme to
of the Clty
Regardlng the TIF request, please transmlt your TIF stafflng to us on
1
Sept 22nd, w1th
f1rst read1ng on
a "formal"'uest
October 16th
letter after the C1ty Con~~SSlon
Thanks'
Dav1d
>>> "Clayton, G1na" <gclayton@clearwater-fl com> 08/15/03 08 19AM >>>
I've attached a work1ng schedule for the Plan reV1ew Could you
please
flll
1n the dates 1n the two h1ghl1ghted boxes? I know you are really
busy,
but
I need to get th1S out to the Manager as soon as poss1ble Thank1ng
you 1n
advance for your ass1stance'
-----Or1g1nal Message-----
From Gordon Beardslee [ma1lto gbeardsl@co p1nellas fl us]
Sent Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1 00 PM
To gclayton@clearwater-fl com
SubJect RE Dates
G1na, we don't need BCC author1zat1on to take the Plan to them for
approval Slnce the1r act10n lS by resolut1on w1th no publ1c hear1ng
If
the BCC delegates to the C1ty the author1ty to establ1sh TIF for the
expanded area on Oct 7th, staff would request at that meet1ng that
the
BCC author1ze a publ1c hear1ng on Nov 18th for the County to cons1der
approval of a redevelopment trust fund for Downtown Clearwater
>>> "Clayton, G1na" <gclayton@clearwater-fl com> 08/13/03 09 2SAM >>>
At one t1me we thought you told us the Board had to author1ze hear1ng
th1S
1tem at a preced1ng meet1ng When the 1tem was gOlng to be on Sept
23rd we
thought the BCC had to glve you perm1ss1on to advert1se for the
hear1ng
at
the1r Sept 9th meet1ng
Just to clar1fy - no act10n w1II need to be taken by the Board to
schedule
the meet1ng that w1II occur on Oct 7? Thanks'
-----Or1g1nal Message-----
From Gordon Beardslee [ma1lto gbeardsl@co p1nellas fl us]
Sent Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9 22 AM
To gclayton@clearwater-fl com
SubJect RE Dates
I w1II get you the dates you asked for The Oct 7th act10n lS by
resolut1on It lS not a publ1C hear1ng 1tem, so no advert1sement lS
necessary
>>> "Clayton, G1na" <gclayton@clearwater-fl com> 08/13/03 09 13AM >>>
Thanks - at Wh1Ch meet1ng w1II the Board agree to advert1se the Oct
7th
publ1C hear1ng? Also please glve me the dates I need to have
1nformat1on to
you to meet your 1nternal deadl1nes for the BCC meet1ng I have the
2
deadl1ne for the CPA meet1n~Thanks Gordon
-----Or1g1nal Message-----
From Gordon Beardslee [ma1lto gbeardsl@co p1nellas fl us]
Sent Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8 59 AM
To gclayton@clearwater-fl com
Cc Br1an Sm1th, Dav1d Walker, J1m Bennett, Jacob Stowers
SubJect Re Dates
Yes I got w1th Br1an late yesterday and we agreed that the follow1ng
schedule would work The schedule 1S based on our conversat1on last
Fr1day
Sept
Sept
Oct
Oct
Oct
Nov
Nov
Nov
4 - C1ty f1rst hear1ng on Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Plan
18 - C1ty adopts Plan
7 - BCC approves Plan (by Resolut1on)
15 - PPC cons1ders Plan and makes recommendat1on
16 - C1ty f1rst hear1ng on Trust Fund and TIF
4 - CPA approves Plan
6 - C1ty adopts Trust Fund Ord and TIF
18 - BCC takes act10n on Trust Fund and TIF (Ord1nance Act1on)
>>> "Clayton, G1na" <gclayton@clearwater-fl com> 08/13/03 08 17AM >>>
Any luck conf1rm1ng our dates yet? Thanks
G1na L Clayton
Long Range Plann1ng Manager
(727) 562-4587
gclayton@clearwater-fl com
3
.
Clayton, Gina
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Thursday, August 14, 2003 2 00 PM
Owens, Reginald W , Clayton, Gina
Akin, Pam, Phillips, Sue, Fierce, Lisa, Gerlock, Frank
RE Schedule
To be on the November mB meetmg, they would have to apply by September 17 Based on the magrutude of the
project and many polIcy ISsues to be worked out mtemally and then negotIate With them, I would expect that to
make that deadlme we would currendy be m dISCUSSIOnS With them on the sIte plan and denSIty pool, etc (and they
haven't called us to start that dIScusslon-I don't know what the holdup IS) While I and the Planmng staff stand
ready to Jump nght m With the developer to work on the sIte plan, arclutectural deSIgn, denSIty pool Issues and
development agreement, It seems unlIkely that It would be possIble to meet that deadlme due to the compleXity of
the Issues mvolved
For your mfotmatIon, for preVIOUS cases that mcluded a development agreement along With a sIte plan, the Qty and
developer were m negOtiatIons on that agreement for multIple weeks-sometImes months-pnor to the submIttal
deadlme Please keep m mmd that the Development Agreement goes to the mB along With the sIte plan for
revIew and a recommendatIon from the mB to the cc.
Perhaps a solution would be to have another meetmg With Beck and therr archItect to begm senous dIscUSSIons
about the sIte plan along With seemg the schedule for negotiation on the development agreement ISsues Some
more senous dISCUSSIons between us would help me to better Judge therr readmess to submIt-and also gIVe us an
Idea about the pomts of agreement/dIsagreement on the development agreement/sIte plan! desIgn,etc
Fmally, as I mentioned at the Strategy meetmg, If the CC approves a code amendment on Sept 4 and Sept 18, there
will be a new schedule for mB and DRC cases We are m the process of fmahzmg that schedule but generally It
will ADD tune from submIttal t'o bemg reVIewed at the mB As soon as that IS fmalIzed, I will get It to you and
for dISCUSSIon With Beck
I hope tlus helps-as I saId, we are ready to enter mto senous negotIations With them, but I thmk we need to be
realIStIc on the magmtude and compleXity of the ISsues mvolved Thanks
Cyndi T arapani
Planmng Drrector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Owens, Reginald W
Sent' Thursday, August 14, 2003 1041 AM
To' Clayton, Glna, Tarapam, Cyndl
Cc Campos, Geraldine, Akin, Pam, Harriger, Sandy, PhillipS, Sue, Arasteh, Mahshld, Wllson, Denise A
SubJect Schedule
Cyndle/Glna
Would appreciate a time line from planning
Beck IS In agreement With the Idea of bnnglng forth a Development Agreement With the city for approval at the first
CRA/Commlsslon meeting In January 2004 - what date would they have to submit a formal site plan application to
plannIng to appear before the COB at their 11/18 meeting?
We are working With the group to define their Development Agreement process and these dates would be helpful
1
.
-----'
~,r{)
-~ ~ \
')Z
p
.
By the way, Beck will be Initiating their site plan process with Planning by contacting you/cyndle next week - they have
put together an Internal team and seem very excited about starting this project - they will be pursuing 140 Units, but are
totally open to working with planning on design Issues
For you Info - they are also In diScussions with the Development Group on the Superblock, and might end up being
their development management team (talking theatre/condo/retall) - this IS the same group we will most likely meet
with In two weeks
2
,. .,.
- ce wom~~ cu Wb
..;
~j ~L~--63
~_.~ ~ -._~~ f\fPZQ~~~~~_
d/tJJllj tJ ".
- ___ =-... IEl" - ~
~ __~-"""""'~::lf~ - f~"..~~
- t)] l' Mlt eoJ U~ ~-~~-
-fIt - ,~ - ..---.."'"Z7~~
C&l1~ J~:t : ~~~,~--
~~~~
...~~ ~~~_. - -~----,~ =~~-- , =
~ ... - - ~=~==l~
~~ ~~~-~~ ~
--- ~:---=)
-~~ ~"'" ~--~~ ..~:::~
~'l.._........-- ~
,,~tt ""
...~""
~ ~..-- ~ - - ~~~...:::-~.=,~ ,-
~ ~I' ~
C -- ---~ -- ~.....'~-
--=r;;....~ ~ ~~,
~;~
~ -- ""~- ~.."".~
---~~ ~ ~~ 8est-c;o...~
Available
..0(\ .L!YiJ/l' -~ /
- ~""""""" -~-'r----<7
-- ~ -- ~~ ~....,""~ -
......",...--.,...= ~~~~~ --
---~-~ -, ~- _...;;lC.
~~~~_m",~ ~ -".1.&.1 ~':O"""''''''-'... ---< -----~
---~ - . -"'-"'--'-":;loo,.-.o---
- . -- . w ~~-~-~"""---
- ~~ , ~~~~ -
------=== - - - -
~ ~ ..,.-.r:-"'""""-....~~ -
- -
- ~~~~~~.,-"'-...~~~'"
--- ~ _~..J~~"':'C~ -~
" - -~-~~..".,. -~
=--==~
~L2~~=
-~~- --
~ - ~~
/
~_~~~_ I'J
~~~~'""'~"""~......::r-_____ -~"
, -\,
'.--~-~~=~--
~~~~--==~
-~..--..,.,,"~
-~~~ ~~~"---
.\
\
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent
To
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Wednesday, June 25,2003212 PM
Clayton, Gina, Fierce, Lisa, Gerlock, Frank
FW Station Square
f)'l-I will want your particIpation on the desIgn reVIew Reg wlll be converung a meeting every two weeks and we
may all have to pitch m on attendance and keepmg on track WIth tlus project Remember that I will be on vacation
shortly after the July 14 CIty COtnmlSSIOn meeting As soon as the meeting 1S set, I will let you know and we will get
a game plan gomg Thanks
Cyndt Tarapam
Planrung Dttector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Owens, Reginald W
Sent. Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12 47 PM
To' 'nlckpavonettl@beckgroup com'
Ce. Akin, Pam, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Harriger, Sandy, PhillipS, Sue, Campos, Geraldine, Arasteh, Mahshld, QUillen, Michael
Subject. Station Square
Nick
As we discussed yesterday, on June 23rd the RFP Selection Committee selected1-ec~as the Preferred Development
Team for the Station Square CRA site ---.
To get prepared for thiS proJect, I am taking thiS opportunity to define how Beck and the City might move forward
On July 14th, our Department Will be seeking approval from the CRA to commence negotiation of a development
agreement with your company
As qUite a few departments have a vested Interest In thiS proJect, we are proposing that we schedule a short kick-off
meeting with Beck and your architects dUring the week of July 14th - we Will coordinate thiS with your office
After the kick-off meeting, you and your architects should schedule Independent on-going meetings with Cyndl Tarapanl,
Planning Director (562-4547) and commence working towards a design solution on the bUilding Cyndl Will be your lead
contact on all planning and architectural design Issues, and on the application process for site plan review
After the same kick-off meeting we Will also schedule you for ongoing meetings With our Department (ED, Reg Owens
562-4047)), Legal/Pam Akin, City Attorney (562-4010), and Ralph Stone/ASSistant City Manager (562-4058), and
Engineering ( Mahshld Arasteh/Publlc Works Admin 562-4757 & Michael QUillen, Director of Engineering 562-4743) - so
we can move forwad on the Issues surrounding the Development Agreement, Incentives, streetscape, englneenng and the
parking allocation
ThiS array of senior city staff In turn, Intends to meet on a regular basIs Internally, so each department can share were they
are With design Issues, the development agreement and other Items
As we discussed on June 23rd, Dayhoff, L L C , has expressed Interest In becoming a partner In your group's project
They are particularly Interested In Investing In the office and retail/restaurant portion and retaining ownership of these
components
As we Will be dealing With Beck as the preferred developer, It Will be your responSibility to follow up on a possible JOint
venture et al With Dayhoff Like yourself, Mr Dayhoff IS away until the 9th of July, and he suggested that perhaps you and
he could get together on July 10th or 11th - Uday Lele/Dayhoff, Inc 727-443-5544 - his associate AnJanl Abhyankar 727-
480-3775 can also set up a meeting for them Hopefully, something can be worked out between the two parties - good
luck
Please contact me If you ever have any questions or Issues, as our department, In concert With the CRA Director Mr
1
~
~
Rath Stone, will be your lead liaison for rnls project
One last thought, I am not sure If you have actually formed an LLC for this project yet If not, you might wish to consider a
more defined name for the Project, such as Station Square LLC - just a suggestion as It might help all of us In marketing
this project to end users as they would then readily know where the project IS located
Thanks
Congratulations on your selection, and we look forward to an approval on July 14th to move forward Please be In
attendance at that meeting In City Hall at 1 OOpm (third floor), In case any questions are raised
q~f~~J ,
,,' 'II \
I
2
/Id f}J1>>1.
{;. Z~ o?;
~
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
PROPERTY AREA 42 124 SF =
PROJECT AREA (NOT INCL PARKING)
PARKING Sll\UCTURE AREA.
TOTAL PROJECT AREA
FAR
APPROX BUILDING HEIGHT
100 FOR SALE UNITS
RETAIL AT STREET LEVEL
PARKING Sll\UCTURE
112000 SF
9 900 SF
33S SPACES
UNIT BREAKDOWN
TYPEA IBRlIBA WI DEN
TYPE B 2BRl2BA
I 000 SF
I 300 SF
RETAIL BREAKDOWN
SMALL SHOPS
RESTAURANT
S 100 SF
4 800 SF
Best Copy
A vailab'e
E9
AERIAL CONTEXT PHOTOGRAPH
NOT TO SCALf
-~
~,
."
967 ACRES
143900 SF
144 SOO SF
288 400 SF
68S
160
103 4 DUIACRE
60 UNITS
40 UNITS
,
liSt il t ion S q n, ,il,.~, .~,: fj I Il il I' Wilt e " II
, J -
-"'=
~
CID
~~
_____ I I I
EXISTING
PARKING
STRUCTURE
III
;:)
I
I
EXlSllNG
OFFICE
BUILDING
(
~
~
.
"1
BeSt Copy
Avaitab1e
/
III
;:)
I
i
EB
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL I
I _20'.0'"
REf All
SMAll SHOPS
RESTAURANT
TOTAL RETAil
SIOOSF
1 BOO SF
9 900 SF
PARKING
39 SPACES
liSt a t i (I II S q II, ,a '"~' .~ " fj I ear w ate " II
OPEN TO BELOW
"-
:J
"-
~
~
z
o
"-
~
~
"-
:J
~
~
z
o
~
~
SPECULATlVE
OFFICE
BALCONY
TYPICAL
E9
~
I
E9
OFFICE
PARKING
12 500 SF PER LEVEL
37 SPACES PER LEVEL
Best Copy
A yailable
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 4
FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 2-3
I _10'0"
PARKING 7 SPACES
TOTAL OFFICE
TOTAL PARKING
25 000 SF
74 SPACES
(+/ 3 PER 1 000 SF)
II S t it t i (I II S II \I} , "~', ,~o: f; I e it \' Witt e I' II
"t,CoPY
Available
E9
E9
PARKING LEVEL 5
PARKING LEVEL 6
PARKING LEVEL 7
83 SPACES
83 SPACES
49 SPACES
UNIT TYPE
A-1BR/1BA WI DEN
B - 2BR12BA
AREA.
1 000 SF
1 300 SF
!L
60
40
TOTAL AREA
60000 SF
52000 SF
UJ/~
XC;
~
IO()
FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 5-7
FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 6-10
TOTAL LIVING UNIT AREA.
112000SF
II ~; tat ion S q n, ,il, "~', ,~, I lj I c it " Witt c J' II
~
;#
'"
UNITS
OFFICE
l-
UNITS
UNITS
UNITS
UNITS
PARKING
PARKING
PARKING
OFFIC E
RETAIL
CLEVELAND STREET SECTION
1116.1-(1
CLEVELAND STREET ELEVATION
1/16" 1-0
II S tat i (I II S q II} , ,~', !~'" lj I e a " Wilt II I' II
..
r;o'
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent
To
Subject
Haines, Angel
Thursday, June 12, 2003 10 18 AM
Fierce, Lisa
RE comments on your proposal
anJan1abhyankar@hotma11 com 1S the correct spell1ng, when she spelled 1t out for me on my
vm her a's sound 11ke e's from her accent My bad, I sent th1S to her aga1n already & 1t
worked Sorry
-----Or1g1nal Message-----
From F1erce, L1sa
Sent Thursday, June 12, 2003 10 09 AM
To 'anJan1abhyanker@hotma11 com'
Cc Ha1nes, Angel, Tarapan1, Cynd1, Gerlock, Frank, Clayton, G1na
SubJect FW comments on your proposal
L1sa L F1erce
Ass1stant Plann1ng D1rector
C1ty of Clearwater - Plann1ng Department
lf1erce@clearwater-fl com
727 562 4561 phone
727 562 4865 fax
Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan
GO BUC(K)S'
th1S 1S the ema11 1 tr1ed to send to you on tuesday and yesterday (and that angel called
you about)
> Hello AnJan1,
>
> Thank you for your subm1ttal regard1ng the Cleveland Street proJect
adJacent to Stat10n Square Park The Plann1ng Department wanted to prov1de
responses to you and your team on the subm1ttal (sorry you couldn't make 1t
back 1n the off1ce) Below are our 1n1t1al comments
>
> * BU11d1ng relat1onsh1p to street - W1th the covered arcade-l1ke area
w1th w1de columns, the f1rst floor/s1dewalk area appears closed off from the
street The columns appears as bUlldlng walls It lS recommended that the
des1gn be open (or columns be made more narrow) to prov1de a more dynam1c
streetscape and enhance the publ1C feel of the street/s1dewalk Th1S could
1nclude more narrow columns along the arcade
>
> * Uses - The m1xture of uses of non-res1dent1al and res1dent1al along
w1th shared park1ng as shown 1S cr1t1cal All tenant spaces on the f1rst
floor should be reta11 or restaurant uses to contr1bute to Cleveland Street
as the maJor reta11 "Ma1n Street" Off1ce uses (lnc1ud1ng real estate
off1ces) should be located on upper floors The pool, deck and spa w111
prov1de a recommended on-s1te recreat10nal fac111ty
>
> * Mass/scale/arch1tecture - The des1gn appears as three separate
bU11d1ngs located adJacent to each other (the southern-lower bU11d1ng
appears separate from the taller, northern bU11d1ngs) Greater step backs
should be prov1ded that are gradual as you move from south to north Th1S
could mean J01n1ng the two res1dent1al towers and recaptur1ng space between
The colors, mater1als and arch1tecture w111 need further embell1shment The
des1gn should be more 1ntegrated to create a more urban scale Use of more
arch1tectural rel1ef 1S recommended The west and north elevat10ns w111
need to have a f1n1shed appearance w1th slm11ar des1gn features
1
>
> * Clrculatlon - Vehlcular access onto Cleveland Street lS not recommended
as lt could cause a real and/or percelved safety lssue There lS a
potentlal confllct between the deslred retall/restaurant uses along the
street wlth the lngress of automoblles lnto the garage Ingress and egress
along Laura Street lS recommended pedestrlan llnks between thlS slte and
the park to the west as shown lS recommended
>
> * Slgnage - Thls wlll be an lmportant part of the deslgn and should be
shown ln some conceptual way early ln the deslgn process
>
> Agaln, thanks to you and the team for meetlng wlth us to reVlew your
proposal We appreclate all your efforts These comments recognlze that
many detalls are yet to be deslgned/dlscussed Should you be selected for
thlS proJect, further deslgn features wlll be addressed wlth Staff and
revlewed under a publlC hearlng by the Communlty Development Board
>
> Should you have any questlons/concerns, feel free to call me
>
>
> Llsa L Flerce
> Asslstant Plannlng Dlrector
> Clty of Clearwater - Plannlng Department
> lflerce@clearwater-fl com
> 727 562 4561 phone
> 727 562 4865 fax
> Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan
> GO BUC(K)S'
>
2
u'
"
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject:
Fierce, Lisa
Tuesday, June 10, 2003 5 17 PM
'anJanl@waterfront-realtors com'
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, Frank, Clayton, Gina
comments on your proposal
> Hello AnJan1,
>
> Thank you for your subm1ttal regard1ng the Cleveland Street proJect adJacent to Stat10n
Square Park The Plann1ng Department wanted to prov1de responses to you and your team on
the subm1ttal (sorry you couldn't make 1t back 1n the off1ce) Below are our 1n1t1al
comments
>
> * BU1ld1ng relat1onsh1p to street - W1th the covered arcade-I1ke area w1th w1de
columns, the f1rst floor/s1dewalk area appears closed off from the street The columns
appears as bU1ld1ng walls It 1S recommended that the des1gn be open (or columns be made
more narrow) to prov1de a more dynam1c streetscape and enhance the publ1c feel of the
street/s1dewalk Th1S could 1nclude more narrow columns along the arcade
>
> * Uses - The m1xture of uses of non-res1dent1al and res1dent1al along w1th shared
park1ng as shown 1S cr1t1cal All tenant spaces on the f1rst floor should be reta11 or
restaurant uses to contr1bute to Cleveland Street as the maJor reta11 "Ma1n Street"
Off1ce uses (lnclud1ng real estate off1ces) should be located on upper floors The pool,
deck and spa w1ll prov1de a recommended on-s1te recreat10nal fac1l1ty
>
> * Mass/scale/arch1tecture - The des1gn appears as three separate bU1ld1ngs located
adJacent to each other (the southern-lower bU1ld1ng appears separate from the taller,
northern bU1ld1ngs) Greater step backs should be prOV1ded that are gradual as you move
from south to north Th1S could mean J01n1ng the two res1dent1al towers and recaptur1ng
space between The colors, mater1als and arch1tecture w1II need further embell1shment
The des1gn should be more 1ntegrated to create a more urban scale Use of more
arch1tectural rel1ef 1S recommended The west and north elevat10ns w1II need to have a
f1n1shed appearance w1th slm1lar des1gn features
>
> * C1rculat1on - Veh1cular access onto Cleveland Street 1S not recommended as 1t could
cause a real and/or perce1ved safety 1ssue There 1S a potent1al confl1ct between the
des1red reta11/restaurant uses along the street w1th the 1ngress of automob1les 1nto the
garage Ingress and egress along Laura Street 1S recommended Pedestr1an 11nks between
th1S slte and the park to the west as shown 1S recommended
>
> * Slgnage - Th1S w1II be an 1mportant part of the des1gn and should be shown 1n some
conceptual way early 1n the des1gn process
>
> Aga1n, thanks to you and the team for meet1ng w1th us to reV1ew your proposal We
apprec1ate all your efforts These comments recogn1ze that many deta1ls are yet to be
des1gned/d1scussed Should you be selected for th1S proJect, further des1gn features w1II
be addressed w1th Staff and rev1ewed under a publ1c hear1ng by the Commun1ty Development
Board
>
> Should you have any quest1ons/concerns, feel free to call me
>
>
> L1sa L F1erce
> Ass1stant Plann1ng D1rector
> C1ty of Clearwater - Plann1ng Department
> If1erce@clearwater-fl com
> 727 562 4561 phone
> 727 562 4865 fax
> Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan
> GO BUC(K)S'
1
--------------------
~
/
~
lfL~. ~.
OVV~
'?
~R.S .
: ~~~ /t{)c>>mo~s
. H~fI1A
-~
"
, ,
\ ,[F/! Crl GCftI1fOS/er/SC I
, ur:trf LEl..B I
. ftt!6kN~ ~
- ~ l'-15t: ff- I
~ JOI1N fV\ ~Q51r
. TOK WY/VN\/ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
~
.. .. 'j
BUILDING CALCULATIONS (PHASE I)
PARKING =
RESTAURANT =
RETAIL =
OFFICE =
CONDOMINIUMS =
OVERALL SLAB =
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
48 + 3 HANDICAPPED SPACES
65 SPACES
74 SPACES
65 SPACES
TOTAL = 252 + 3 SPACES -:: ~
3,584 sq ft INTERIOR SPACE
1,719 sq ft OUTSIDE COVERED SEATING
(fOTAL_ ~ ~,~_~g_!t~PANERA NEEDS AT LEAST 4,500)
1 ) 1 ,128 sq ft
2) 1,748 s
LEVEL 5
16,885 sq ft INTERIOR
4,759 sq ft TERRACE
LEVEL 6 8,348 sq ft INTERIOR
852 sq ft TERRACE
~- 25,233 INTERIOR ~
5,611 TERRACE
18 TYPICAL UNITS + 1 PENTHOUSE
UNIT SIZES =
~4
LEVELS 8 - 11 =
LEVELS 6 - 7 =
LEVEL 5 =
LEVELS 1 - 4 =
1 ,527 sq ft
1,529 sq ft
1,538 sq ft
2,457 sq ft (Pent)
8,181 sqft (each) = 32,724
18,537 sq ft (each) = 37,074
22,341 sq ft = 22,341
34,228 sq ft (each) = 136,912
TOTAL
= 229,051 sq ft
... i. .. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ \ .,
-. .. 4. , .-
"
,
t .
f
t
~~
~'-~
\~J~
]~~~
~ ~~ \ ~a I
~ ~~~ \r-
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BUILDING CALCULATIONS (PHASE II)
OFFICE =
CONDOMINIUMS =
OVERALL SLAB =
LEVEL 5
18 TYPICAL UNITS + 1 PENTHOUSE
UNIT SIZES =
li
LEVELS 8 - 11 =
LEVELS 6 - 7 =
LEVEL 5 =
1,527 sq ft
1 ,529 sq ft
1,538 sq ft
2,457 sq ft (Pent)
8,181 sq ft (each) =
9,171 sq ft
9,451 sq ft
32,724
= 18,342
9,451
=
TOTAL = 60,517 sq ft
~cl(~f?~
t,~
1>'2,
\ i)o
1-\~~
::;~
~~~1D~1?~ -:::>5 1o~ VNCB
~
~l-
~
;ZcD
p!qUl~
"2.( ~s. U 1J \ 'I f~, ""- (tz.:~
-2-( II 0lf0 d.1 U' L ~ 4:6
( ~(l4Yl> ~~) 81(~
~ f'U:; c, A:i4 ~ rrY
Uf~ ~ ::z-fuvt~(rl
I
: >
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
+ r
bIIDJ
L________
rn::Ild
~
~
'9
\9 RESTAURANT
~ 3,584 sq ft
~
I/) PATIO SEATING
.~ 1,719 sq ft
~1~
RETAIL
1 ,128 sq f
/
~Jl
I + t
~ I
U~ I
~~(
~
t
RETAIL
1 ,748 sq f
~I'I i ~
~
- -
ne
~0 tJJ:~ tI~
()i 1\0V /
II
-. ....
-
~~
iD"O
'l(
E~ GARAGE :\\~
N ~~~
EXISTING
RETAIL
EXISTING
POST OFFICE
.
.
- -
QdA/t~ ~
I
I I
I ~ I
I ON UP I ~~\;\G ~0
I bITJI] .
'0~
I
I
I bITJI]
I bITJI]
I LEVEL 2 - GARAGE
I l'
N
I
I bIT]]
I EXISTING EXISTING
RETAIL POST OFFICE
I
I ~
I
PROPERTY LINE
I
I ..... r-,r- A. IP"'O. "".....r-or-r-.....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
bD:TIJ
bD:TIJ
bD:TIJ
ON
.
~
74 SPACES
bD:TIJ
LEVEL 3 - GARAGE
I'
N
bIT]]
EXISTING
RETAIL
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING
POST OFFICE
I
I
I ~
I blIIIl I DN bIT]]
..
I
I
I
65 SPACES
I bIT]] bIT]]
I
I
I LEVEL 4 - GARAGE
I I
bIT]] N
I
I
I ~ 'f
I
I
I PROPERTY LINE
.-., r- r-I '" r"Oo ,........r""Or-r-.....
I
~ ~ P~PER~L1NE
CLEVELAND STREET I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\c1t1 , ~
1,538 sq ft
PHASE I
OFFICE SPACE
16,885 sq ft
. . .
TERRACE
4,759 sq ft
1,529 sq ft
1,527 sq ft
TERRACE
LEVEL 5 - OFFICE
(CONDO PHASE II)
I'
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I ~ ..-
I
Ct:>
..- ('I)
I
t-..
LO
I
I
I
1,538 sq ft
PHASE I
BLOCK-
OUT
OR POO
ABOVE
EQUIPMENT
FUTURE OFFICE SPACE
OR STORAGE
OFFICE SPACE
8,348 sq ft
285 sq ft
282 sq ft
1,529 sq ft
1,527 sq ft
LEVEL 6 - OFFICE
(CONDO PHASE II)
I'
N
'.
PROPERTY LINE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I ~ .....
I
..... (t)
I C')
t-..
LO
I
I
I
PHASE I
I
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
I
!
I
,
I
I
I
!
i
\
"
"
"
1,529 sq ft
POOL
1,527 sq ft
8
POOL DECK
LEVELS 7
CONDOMINIUMS/
POOL DECK
1 ,527 sq ft
I'
N
1,529 sq ft
1,538 sq ft
1 ,529 sq ft
PROPERTY LINE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
\"
,
,
"
"
PHASE I '-"
,
,
"
"
''-''
,
'"
"
'"
',-
'-',
"
,
"
"
'-,
'-- --------------------------
1 ,538 sq ft
1 ,527 sq ft
LEVELS 8 - 10
CONDOMINIUMS
1 ,527 sq ft
l'
N
1 ,529 sq ft
1 ,538 sq ft
1,529 sq ft
PROPERTY LINE
CLEVELAND STREET
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
\,
"
,
"
PHASE I '-,
,
,
"
"
2,457 sq ft
'-',
,
'-
,
"
''-''- 1 ,527 sq ft
",
"'-, ~~
"
",
'-- -------------------------
LEVEL 11
CONDOMINIUMS
1 ,527 sq ft
l'
N
2,457 sq ft
1,538 sq ft
~ ~ PROPERITLlNE
CLEVElAND STREET I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\,
"-
"
PHASE I ~
"
2,457 sq ft
1 ,527 sq ft
tI
LEVEL 11
CONDOMINIUMS
1,527 sq ft
l'
N
2,457 sq ft
1,538 sq ft
~ ~ PR~ERITUNE
. - Q~lAND STREET -- I
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PENTHOUSE b
N Pam-tOt.l$E
b
CONDOMINIUMS b OONOOMIN1tJMS
b
CONDOMINIUMS b CQNOOMINlt1MS
.
0
CONDOMINIUMS ~ CONOOMIN1UMS
b
CONDOMINIUMS b POOL DECK ~OOMINU.JM$
0
N 33 1'" b
OFFICE b STORAGE I FUTURE OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS
b
OFFICE b OONDOMlN1UMS
V ~ b
GARAGE b GARAGE .rT""ft>..
-...cO~Ol5' 'i!'{O~O}!!l!l'
tI"
~ b
GARAGE b GARAGE ~
~
"""O~O1l'l' 't!l'o~oe;r
~ 0
GARAGE ~ GARAGE .rT""ft>..
COVERE~ """O~Ol5' 'i!'{O~O~
WALK
b
RETAIL I RESTAURANT b GARAGE I""T"'-. I
'i!'{O~O);o5'
ROOF
D PHASE II WORK
ROOF
~L1 I Cr!Nlff Cfierl T~e;<4 T(~ -- -
1;11\ f {I - f?rLt A\J J (ZIc;/fIrlC
I
q>n-o~! uTMllN ~~
I' .
- I cf1lffN_ It '::ci':::'
I -"JI rn I Lily[ 10 LAb'! fJ1SLV0[ pj
I
I
'~B .
fVll[l6~ UJAf6~,~!tr 8fUi) KrtPt/ (~
~ ft)
1ifivD uu0 CUf7
f3i1f)IJL~ S('tllf('fAJ6 A1 01'( LN~ 1iAfle.
!Jto ~15fNA1U(L ~ It1 ~E::. - ft//1t/;{(
(}JYdNr 1DY2- ~ (CIkN-+fC.- 10 (JiJ NIIW
(iSJs'$Ao 6P' ~ nr ~)
, l ~ A 51 Df:vJAut- {Rj Uru?A srr
1ft <):(k-ef (jN n~'(J f1-&)rf-,
- fJ~o ?j I or: k0ess fl'r ~~ ~
-
, MAL fJ'fUp 'P Ui~ :1- pv;Suiz )IM ~
1--- \AW1 ~l"'-- fD ~/Yl6 o~ 'PV~
- (6-Al16 ) f'J~) (LV ilUJ) U~~ j... Po ~
- - ~f~ ~ KlA, b~ lUD 1V/YtL SfltU
t Nltfv[) to felli\! fVlZ- 17Jtlj Now 5. .
~ ll-f0j fJWo tv ~ UW.-"LG ~ !Wi- tAl
lHts t W'f; vul/.1; ~. (,f [)Jf. (~ OC--
I fl@?1 f7v6 )
'l2-~VI ~ 11 DGV~6fr1~f /Jr,6jUA~f4Il~A \r
----r.- -
... _.--
ftLfufmAA +-~ (jJot fwfD
ALfYf; LtJG PA7LL. ~/LAlXt\ J'T
~1ftV..--? ~ ;r O~ 1Wff uv6Lr--r ~
~Nl{ MAW: fry0f ~j" t~ AU'-J S UJrt!CX-
IS-r~~) ~
~16tdf ~ . . .
W LG {lvpt-1~/t:s~ f !A(ll+fff I1t&LC t+r
F/Z-brVL )O{/ /D - >("~ F/3-6(
8eSt Co'"
Available
_~1' LPI H;f' I eft (r~ Po>. PiJzJAN /VI. ~ &-_
<6"/(2--0* 8h1 ~~ Be6tCopy
Available
-If p(rlJilffl. ~ l/1/i1l .
~~ 1rflArvt ~ -1UfJU) 15 ffp 'I
(YtuJtMufVl
~ f[u~;;D&. A-1 if~uYJvf I~
If/ ~ 2 /LW)
_ ~ .~ ~ 0 P :) ~ { < Af)D 1 L -- LrouO PfZ6u1 ~ ~J.ff?J1J)lr
---- - (.(\ /We (h~O)#j fOVl f/dfFYL Lt~ [~
~-~ - S7VY0 lff> · pY ~'t ;2LfI lJJ);~ - /JJ2U)
--q Nft4f). ~ ~ UP\j~ jl19Q')
- .*ff)) ~ ~ -1Z4/AA~ ~
*~M~~-flw~
. -+- C~ - ~7tJ f?r?uC 12c Fl-
--- u 3 /~~ /JPNrc f~k fJptLL <;~ J
- -~ ~-(~ - NfC€D 1- #zJ~ ftJvC
- - . - CV0t~ l~ ~ f(~
t uJL~ frVf5 -' 2>1tmw ~ -~ (rW ~
- - .-- ~ ~ - U47filfVuS ~
f- .-UQ/:m14 1YV.:7 ~ '1/ 0 ./ C~ (I\si) ~aww)
~~ .t~~~ !J?' fk6 ~-fi/$Lk M &/2- .
fY\ tv~..t-< ((~u (') ~ Li. 1\) wt\-I J ( 11fT)(( ~ ~ - Lu?n 1 Sl ~
-"tCopy
Avaifabfe
---- ~ <~~W~.-ftl!2-~~~' ~-~ ~-~~tm:2_iQ~8i----_.
__ _~~AU~€fdtn!0-~_ P _12'1.~?.____ _
~---l MOO ~-_._~~:- --- E1-r__3 :-~.. -~ l~-~~=:
.s~ __~_-:::'. _b1~ IQ_ (},lJ!E-__'tu'f.AJfj(!f~!J{L
___ l____,~ __~--_lli _~-~~_~___<<~~.____~____________
---~--..i -_._-~_..__._-~~--" --~~~~----------~----~- ~-- -~----
- ---- --- t{b .-~~Stti!-dIf:1-_-15f_.&WL _N/_..Q!,!.\-~ --~-
_ _ __ __ _ __~~_~_ _~). __ __- _ __ H____ _ __ _ _~_.___
-: .:=-:1;- :_~=-jT~)~~- -. u.- ~-~~:r-;- ~ &-._ -. ~=
--- ----.-- - r ~- - U'f: - .l ~'f-~ -~) -. - - -----. . -...-
- -. -~~_ ~'1L~i~TU0----__:-P~02~ _~~-~M UiJJ1.~ _--
~------_..._-- - - -~~- - ~ "'''''''-- - -""~ -- --- -- - -- - - - --
------ -~ - - - __.__G~ oP-- U -- --- -- 1/4J1 ...
-------- -_-I - ~- - ~ - - Jj?{~_-tfi_ . .---
- --- ----, ~ - --. ----. - I{ --
._____~__ ..__ kW lJ0W_ ..~ . ~~_ LQ_l_~ _H ~_ _
(8 I (A ~
:~::___- :~-:-~J6).ttf'9 rt - - =::-::_~-=I_ _ - ~----
------ ~ --TV -~ ptcll - ~- IT 191 ~L - - ---
- - --- -- ---MedAitf:tW-~ - ~. ---- . - -- - -- -
~ (AlL. ~. C(fJ)(L OP @(tU
Best COpy
Available
ItuJ fYltptfi/fYI
.
,
)~I7-'-otj
Station Square - Revisions to Original Submission
Building Width
The wIdth of the bUIldmg was decreased by approxImately 23' ThIS reVISIon was made
for several reVISIOns, mcreased parkmg efficIency, pedestnan egress from Laura to
Cleveland, the opportumty for a retaIl face on the east sIde of the bUIldmg, fire ratmgs on
the east sIdc of thc bUIldmg, and mcreased opemngs on the east sIde of the bUIldmg
.
Parking Efficiency ~
The efficIency of the parkmg spaces has mcreased ~ThIS deSIgn provIdes
a more efficIent parkmg layout that has elImmated dpproxlmdtely 20,000 ~f of
mefficlent space
.
Pedestrian Access
The reduced bUIldmg wIdth allows for a contmuous sIdewalk from Laura Street to
Cleveland Street ThIS provIdes the safest method of egress and allows people to
mteract WIth thIS project all SIdes of the project
. Additional Retail Front
The reduced bUIldmg WIdth allows storefront to be placed on the east SIde of the
bUIldmg ThIS creates the opportumty to have addItIOnal outdoor dmmg
opportumtIes on the east SIde of the buIldmg It also maXImIzes the fleXIbIlIty of
the retaIl space and opens up the east SIde of the bUIldmg to becommg a retaIl
front as well as the Cleveland Street facade
. Fire Ratings
The mcreased dIstance to the east face of the buIldmg from the east property lIne
has mcreased the amount of opemngs allowed on the east face The ongmal
desIgn reqUIred that the east face of the bUIldmg mamtam certam fire ratmgs The
garage on the east face had to mamtam a three-hour firewall No openmgs were
permItted ThIS also tnggered the need for mechamcal ventIlatIon for the parkmg
faCIlIty In addItIOn, opemngs m thIS plane were lImIted to 10% Wmdows were
lImIted and had to be fire rated
Increased Stepback from Cleveland Street
The bUIldmg stepback from Cleveland has been mcreased from 30' to approxImately 63'
The first stepback IS 18' at elevatIon 25' above grade The second stepback IS 45' at
elevatIOn 55' above grade The second stepback was mcreased to faCIlItate the pool bemg
moved to the south of the bUIldmg The southern edge of the property IS the most
advantageous locatIon for the pool ThIS locatIon WIll receIve the most sunlIght for the
longest portIOn of the day
')
\
Retail Space
The ongmal desIgn lIke the reVISIOn has approxImately 10,000 sf of retaIl space on the
ground level The 15,000 sfwas a maXImum If the tenants choose to construct
mezzanInes m theIr space The reVISIOn does not allow for the constructIOn of mezzanInes
but was configured to provIde the maXImum flexIbIlIty for the retaIl space The retaIl
space has the opportUnIty for storefronts on all three sIdes and can be configured In a
vanety of ways
cf ~f1~
& v i2:c:.~ -\- 'Br:"..,
L- f --:7
r( {7~~
_ t;. (Cf .() 'f
z of),-.", : k,
- - A.. t C1(~5 f-:/1). ~<JJ- c~ ~S,Q,., t) r"-17
-1 ~"I prtkr~ -~~ - 2 Ai:(.c." fJ':n 4 t?" \, 'f
j . is y~ c/.,,. (f r,J~ ~ee-C7L\ (..( I
. I y.... /laueJ J., .P;t:-J.r ~ ~:"
- 44.... J. ~#O ~~ ,.,re, or; ~~_.!- f) })..4., Q
I'II~ ).!fj /1,,- (? c.,.... ~ ~c, 4~/I. _
f{~~J:A;n -JJA () ~ ~~c.a, k-
o.L~f7 ,.,/.,,j '1'':fJ~)..
-N. ~~f ~~P1
~ N~ 1 ~~ (~~ JU- +~ \J_
_'1' u1~ ~ f- C, /1I~ 1 ~, ~ c,L,~
- tn./ ^eIlr/ lrkr. fr- (or <[J44 fpJ.,4/)
-'S:7 {~(J4t..e/ J:A1" .hf:J. )Ji_
Arc-h:~1w.r(t; _ _ _ ~ _ _
~,L:}W krftA//1:<<c,'r) ~__?Jtq.{'s J,
h~* vof 1-4 '91-"7-
-. "";(l)'~ 7 ;.J..k- b",.r);1 .
I
]
j
I
I
~ 1
J J
1
- 1
J
I
\
... I
'f !f _ I ( r..!!-
'J
1
j
!
"
-~- ,..
...tCOPY r
Available
'j
I
-\
I
J ,
I
1
tJ
~~~, \ ,,1CQ
S- /lq-ot
I
'l
'lW-A t1
Station Square - Revisions to Original Submission
Building Width
The wIdth of the bUIldmg was decreased by approxImately 23' ThIs reVISIOn was made
for several reVISIOns, mcreased parkmg efficIency, pedestnan egress from Laura to
Cleveland, the opportumty for a retaIl face on the east sIde of the bUIldIng, fire ratmgs on
the east sIdc of thc bUIldmg, and mcreased opemngs on the east sIde of the bUIldmg
. Parking Efficiency
The efficIency of the parkmg spaces has mcreased by 20% ThIS desIgn prOVIdes
a more efficIent parkmg layout that has elImInated approxlmdtely 20,000 ~f of
IneffiCIent space
. Pedestrian Access
The reduced bUIldmg wIdth allows for a contmuous sIdewalk from Laura Street to
Cleveland Street ThIS proVIdes the safest method of egress and allows people to
mteract WIth thIS project all SIdes of the project
. Additional Retail Front
The reduced bUIldmg WIdth allows storefront to be placed on the east SIde of the
bUIldmg ThIS creates the opportumty to have addItIonal outdoor dmmg
opportumtIes on the east SIde of the bUIldIng It also maXImIzes the fleXIbIlIty of
the retaIl space and opens up the east SIde of the bUIldmg to becommg a retaIl
front as well as the Cleveland Street facade
. Fire Ratings
The mcreased dIstance to the east face of the bUIldmg from the east property lIne
has Increased the amount of opemngs allowed on the east face The ongmal
deSIgn reqUIred that the east face of the bUIldmg mamtam certaIn fire ratIngs The
garage on the east face had to maIntaIn a three-hour firewall No opemngs were
permItted ThIS also tnggered the need for mechamcal ventIlatIOn for the parkIng
faCIlIty In addItIon, opemngs In thIS plane were lImIted to 10% WIndows were
lImIted and had to be fire rated
Increased Step back from Cleveland Street
The bUIldIng stepback from Cleveland has been Increased from 30' to approxImately 63'
The first stepback IS 18' at elevatIon 25' above grade The second stepback IS 45' at
elevatIon 55' above grade The second stepback was Increased to faCIlItate the pool beIng
moved to the south of the bUIldIng The southern edge ofthe property IS the most
advantageous locatIOn for the pool ThIS locatIOn WIll receIve the most sunlIght for the
longest portIOn of the day
J
;\
Retail Space
The ongInal desIgn lIke the reVISIOn has approxImately 10,000 sf of retaIl space on the
ground level The 15,000 sfwas a maXImum If the tenants choose to construct
mezzanInes In theIr space The reVISIOn does not allow for the constructIOn of mezzamnes
but was configured to prOVIde the maXImum flexIbIlIty for the retaIl space The retaIl
space has the opportumty for storefronts on all three sIdes and can be configured In a
vanety of ways
- .-
'.r
?~...I P>~J../J
-
("~31'-~
[. H~,L.
H~ctu~1r
- ~~_~~LLfd.Pr! ~4......_J_>:t.t~.$L.").~~?!m&:
~-.it.. ~a.,-~ ~ ~ 4~ '~~~ef: ...fL_c...~'J?~L
- f~j,:I_~~L('~Z") S~_~____~~ ___
,( 7'1 "> j!J
fo ( ~'f ~ yI
"/-- -- -~-
- ~"'7'-<k It" ~:...:I..r ~e-) ~f- -<5__/lk,,; J1Lf'Y~ .
-=-~"~:r1t- ; ~ j.~~_&~-.flvc.~~~_Q.___~_
~~y.t f ~ if, t_o-......... 1"7-....- ~_/l ~:~5--
- ~rk T~ ...._~ (/ I;!.rc. ~ (. Qn-~:J __i:!,_~_4! ~r ('..t-",,-,~ c_.rr.L_____
.. L-:/ ( /~~~ /-k-:7_/f..f.c/ d....,.1 __/~LJ_$.S_L~~I
----;~~uJ: - _!:._~b& { (j h.-( - _'!(( fIL ~~_ )
t~, 1 ^ J /l. ':J
--~;;F +r-? "'~5J!'j..z - c-J,:a--U-I>!tJ ___ __ ___ -____
_______ _ ~_ 1,-_ ?4?lrk:~_rz-~Ce.- ".c- t..-. s.::~~ {# P kctf.4 I',,_._,"'J._______ _____
\ ---;::7-.~l?f.JU",~-.::!-:~~k!-5/;_j J._~:.j:~..L.,Lr__t:!~_~~~I/::~~ _ ______
.- ~~~ ~ - ALL.ce;/,-r)_J___/fl ~~.,. (/)
y~_ >-=-~~~.4~____
, ~ - a ~f ,-
- --x.':;---_7 -; / _____L_~~_
.,P- / d
_--::::- _ '_..-::...~ _ - ~~'1_ ~~ ___
.,76 ~, i. _-=- ~...__ __ ___,
vL
~.Il -c? if
~~A- ~_ _____
f."t,.~l
is ,..:..,.,
---~- --- Best-CoPY-
., .......'8
----Ava' a...__ -
"
,...~C) ~'fl. "'f
;.{
{~
Station Square - Revisions to Original Submission
Building Width
The wIdth of the bUIldmg was decreased by approxImately 23' ThIS reVISIon was made
for several reVISIOns, mcreased parkIng effiCIency, pedestnan egress from Laura to
Cleveland, the opportUnIty for a retaIl face on the east sIde of the bUIldIng, fire ratIngs on
the east sIde of the bUIldmg, and Increased openIngs on the east sIde of the bUIldmg
. Parking Efficiency
The efficIency of the parkmg spaces has mcreased by 20% ThIS deSIgn prOVIdes
a more efficIent parkmg layout that has elImInated approxImdtely 20,000 ~[ of
IneffiCIent space
. Pedestrian Access
The reduced bUIldIng wIdth allows for a contInUOUS sIdewalk from Laura Street to
Cleveland Street ThIS proVIdes the safest method of egress and allows people to
Interact WIth thIS project all SIdes of the project
. Additional Retail Front
The reduced bUIldIng WIdth allows storefront to be placed on the east SIde of the
bUIldIng ThIS creates the opportunIty to have addItIonal outdoor dmmg
opportunIties on the east SIde of the bUIldIng It also maxImIzes the fleXIbIlIty of
the retaIl space and opens up the east SIde ofthe bUIldmg to becommg a retml
front as well as the Cleveland Street facade
. Fire Ratmgs
The Increased dIstance to the east face of the bUIldIng from the east property lme
has Increased the amount of openIngs allowed on the east face The ongmal
deSIgn reqUIred that the east face of the bUIldIng maIntaIn certaIn fire ratIngs The
garage on the east face had to maIntaIn a three-hour firewall No openIngs were
permItted ThIS also tnggered the need for mechanIcal ventilatIOn for the parkmg
faCIlIty In addItion, openIngs In thIS plane were lImIted to 10% Wmdows were
lImIted and had to be fire rated
Increased Step back from Cleveland Street
The bUIldIng stepback from Cleveland has been mcreased from 30' to approxImately 63'
The first stepback IS 18' at elevation 25' above grade The second stepback IS 45' at
elevation 55' above grade The second stepback was Increased to faCIlItate the pool beIng
moved to the south of the bUIldmg The southern edge of the property IS the most
advantageous locatIOn for the pool ThIS location WIll receIve the most sunlIght for the
longest portIOn of the day
)
It
Retail Space
The ongmal desIgn lIke the reVI:.lOn has approxImately 10,000 sf of retaIl space on the
ground level The 15,000 sf was a maXImum If the tenants choose to construct
mezzamnes m theIr space The reVISIon does not allow for the constructIon of mezzanmes
but was configured to prOVIde the maXImum flexIbIlIty for the retaIl space The retaIl
space has the opportumty for storefronts on all three sIdes and can be configured m a
vanety of ways
1?Iz~r~ ~/ur.
C)f11df R14AN fI1()/Lflfl1
- ~ - - &frTIAf'-J SQ.-
--
~-~- - - {))fZb _CUT? -- - _ _ - _ -
~ -- ~ .--- - (fret b7f7 -
--~ _ ---K- - rtJ oP ~ - ~U)~ (~~)
_~ __ _ __ _ . ( * ~ iJJPr:) A 05'NDrfUN tN D ,0 v ) _
__~~.C1 ~'fV/ J?151JG !{JfrUw&O ~ ON ~ {jNL~ ~
__ _~.__ . ~_ _ ~Pl~ t~()50* _ _
.
-
...-.....~~............-~- --- ~--- - -- ----- ~ - - -
..~ -.~-~~ ())\)Jl()_ -LA/Ut 1'0 W D ~ 111(2 rD Cb~
_ - qn_ _ -_ uJrf:- M Rr-j . UsN ~ U P UV rn~bS 1l1K ~ /
Un- - vJlsNl jD --b -.
~- ~ ""... ............,.. - - "" ---..."", ~ ...,. - - -
'~h__ o<k _SU~~ Q~ It> ~(N C~l~ +- ~)
- -- l~-~ +-PML it> . Mirv! lz- fJL1/6
- --- ., - -- (f1MD-_._~- (flU 5
eest CopY
Available
~ - "
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
f-'
Wi
W:
0:::1
f-I
U)I
d
:21
<(I
-11
W'
>,
Wi
-1'
0'
.
STATION SQUARE PARK
cr
<r
I
cr
I
I
<r
I
,
cr
,
,
cr
I
I
cp
I
I
cr
I
<r
I
1--3
I
'I I ,
--j----r----
I I , ,
I I , ,
I I , ,
I I I ,
--j-- - --r
I I LEASABLE I
_ _ L__.9.84~SJl-FL_J.- _
'I I
I I I I :: ~"iQ I
II
--- Ejr- - - - - iii- - --- -H---- - - - ---
II ,
I , , ::
II
COVERED I I II
WALK' I , ::
II
, I I :1
II
--- Ejr--- - ----iii- - - - -H
II
I I , :1
I I
,
~ ONEvt
,
,PARKING
I
r-----
1ElfC:---, I
:-
L_____
o
f-
W
W
0:::
f-
U)
<(
0:::
=>
<(
-1
WI:. ,
ROClII
FEPIII'I
~
ooQ'
I
ONE WAY
't
I , , I ,
I I I , I
<b ~ ~ <0 ~ "-
\
1
EXISTING POST OFFICE SITE I
PARKING LEVEL 0 . StatIon Square I
29 _ SI\lCES
0 18' :rz EB I' Clearwater, Florida
I I I tPIIH I III', 5/6/04
Best Copy
Available
IfDJ [H~ It 0 \!} fE m
UU MAY -7 ~2D4 1.0
PLANNING & OEVElOh" ,) j ~~vcr: I
CITIOF ClEAR'It' ,;_, ~ v " ;
_J
~ \(}')ox& 6.
~~;~
lli>J
~(
f)\.oA\u StatIOn Square RevIsIOns:
fuwv((Q 5 ~#-Vi
",
.
I
,
· Reduced wIdth ofbmldmg, allows for addItIonal openmgs on east elevatIon
· Increased parkmg efficIency
· Increased bUlldmg stepb3!ck on Cleveland street from 30' to approxImately 62'
· Located pool on south slde ofbUlldmg, ophmum locatIOn formaxlmum sunl~..e
· Increased heIght ofbmldmg, remams wIthm 158' maXImum heIght l4-i ~ CJ'1.-'
LV~~I~~'~
.'3 in l C::'
(
~(t~,d
.L iY\Q.1"1V'WO--
Devlations from CDB appr~MtL~ IlviR-
· Retml reduced from maXImum of 15,000sf to approxImately 1 0,500s~ q tJ c;i
· SIte plan reVISIOns relocatmg number and locatIOn of dnve aIsles
· RetaIl on three SIdes
· Opportumty to have two outdoor dmmg areas
· Increased extenor detmlmg at Penthouse floors
.
.
~
at11(~ d:rOaJ f - -/Q ~. kv'~ \Y'o-(R ltJuvJ
?fJfJ pRY qxtW ~
7 WJ vra-r~ yftiJ. ~LU . - /
- dJJY\f ~ LOvtD UJ uJ W~ 8ftLL ·
LroloJ: aiUl&i oYlAIL~ SJ1, lDol.~
- lodl iliM~ ~ tl}()o Gut ~ - nf~..w ".
s~
rfcJn(tJ1lLlfi);
U)irt!,,;L ~ t :t;^~ w~ QYI.'~ wlrvlUl0 ,
Ml~~~cfVt~~.
(40 -b btw. th~ ie ~ ~ UmfJr~
~l&ot~ io ~ ~\rJuw~ _ ~ -J)
~M c~~rrls LA Pav(L
~ . ~Jw&. ~ ~ ~ ~vY\...
7' '. '-\0. 10~~:::'
I ~,~)
~l _ t ,
.
J: ' I j
.1 i
, ""'" I
t: ,
J t l ~
, ,
, ,
.
~
, .
" /
"
,
,I.
t I ~ (4: ~ I ..
, .
, ; .
"
I 1- If ~ t r
J ~.. ~ "" "" w
\ :1 . -.} 1; .. 'lI II>
I' '
l II J J :i
.: t.JlV",..", I (t r-- \}J ..
. "
, , '
I
1
. /.
,
,
, / \
(
, v'
'f
, .
..
Station Square Revisions:
. Reduced wIdth ofbUIldmg, allows for addItIonal opemngs on east elevatIon
. Increased parkmg efficIency
4;;: ? l.(,cJV
NY
· Increased bUIldmg stepback on Cleveland street from 30' to approxImately 62'
. Located pool on south sIde ofbUIldmg, optImum locatIon for maXImum sunhght
· Increased heIght ofbUIldmg, remams wIthm 158' maXImum heIght
. RetaIl on three sIdes
. Opportumty to have two outdoor dmmg areas
. Increased extenor detaIhng at Penthouse floors
Deviations from CDB approval:
. RetaIl reduced from maXImum of 15,000sf to approxImately 10,500sf
. SIte plan reVISIOns relocatmg number and locatIon of dnve aIsles
~,
rf
...
3~_1r _______
';.ll,o'l
_______.'__4 _
. J~/~.,.-~~"'-<;~,...fZ- --~G...' r/-------
-_ h I. _ele,y--,:",p.r-d'~ ~____ "____ _____
~1/J~--~:L!i _j~~_~_~5 ~k ~____ .. ___ __
~ IJ..4,_ L.~_A_5-._5.:4 ._
-=-flf ---'_Y-tr -)~'-.!i~__________ ___ Best .copy ____ __ ____
. k'( p J I)k~ -? 1f9J'&ojPf' Available
_ -~ _I _ .- -- ______,1'____ -. -- ------ ~ ----- - - _--_____
______ _'_lY_Jt""t:s -~ (?_~*s__~__________ ____________
___._~. eA-~e..LP!.,,-! ~""_~__ _____ .__ ___ ~____ ______ _ __ ___ __
~-~:!l/~-...i.7- --(;~-....:~-~-~--CL..J-:.-~---~---.----.
--.-1!I'r-'-e--~2(_--J. -_ _/'~~ _~__._LoI(';i-o- _3::._(Z5-5:-- _ .___ _._______
- -~(-~-L--.-~~---J~~-~-S--------. .. - .- -- - _- -__ .. -.__
- ~-- -SkJ:l ~_nl .. --s:.~-- : Ll~..~~.~ -&O~-~.-_._- ____u_ - _ ___ ____
- -- -r1)7J.....k.--:" J. -- }SI;.j ",,~_J-__ ~"L:' - ':.-- ,,-J.-ld..- __ _ u__
,__ . tk,...--:JL~l/ ~/c. -V4.tt'e.>-.~tk. ~CC~)5-~~_.______ _n______________ _____
- _r~Ls~:~CL. ~_ (_ ~:!I 5M-L)4;J.&-~K- _' _____ __~
- ~'1!.-~?2 ~--~_d--"-~~--~,-I.~:.. - ------
'it}- -- ----- - - (;: /15_ fr..t-1k4-- ~ _G<.rL<A~ - -----
-j -- - -- --- -- --- --- -F7kfl, -{f1-:-- - -- -- --.--
---- ~ ~ ~---fLv :-',.k'""? --....€C-c.<;.}-c,,-l?-? ------- -- --- - ---
____ -- ~ t1{'J ~_~_IZ!':~ _~_(~.'_(',~'?__ v_~__cU~ __ _ ____~_
~----~ L,,~: U~;1 r)r~J ~ J.~;::.~:3 ~::--I:2- -----. . -- ----
- ----vt.....-~ ~-.. -- _. _.1 - .._--~---- .
\~ l~" _____~. . _~ _ ~ ___.~~~ -~C.c; n:I..kc2. -= _Q_~ f:,q -.. d I'eo.i~ _____
___~I_:_\- __ _~~____,____<i&(C_-~-y}c-.k:/:~- __._________
~ ' _'_+_' -= _Yz!.1 L).J..J.-J,&...y. -W..,J.-:.~ ._ ____
.dY{b4
, /I' fUM f;f.{~ M Uf.M1
~p
Station Square Revisions.
. Reduced width ofbUlldmg, allows for addlbonal opemngs on east elevalJon ~
· Increased parkmg efficIency f 6tA Ikl~) PJ?,.U tf, ~ ~
. Increased bmldmg stepback on Cleveland street from 30' to approximately 62' ~~
. Located pool on south side ofbUlldmg, opl1mum 10cal1on for maximum sunhf!)l(
. Increased height ofbulldmg, remams wlthm 158' max,mum helf!)lt /<Ie ((IS) -p (f'( (/S- )
Al>>M..r ~)
. Retail on three sIdes ko t-
~l;\I..~
. Opportumty to have two outdoor dmmg areas
. Increased extenor detaIimg at Penthouse floors
DeviatIOns from CDB approval:
ci/; 1J (
. Retail reduced fro~of I ~l\'Sfto approximately 10,500sf (~~ )
. SIte plan reVISIOns relocatmg number and 10catJon of dnve aIsles
i if( Gt-( f/A f I~~
6- '~~ l' ~ t. I f1I1A--J IA.
_ __-' _ ~~_ __ ~ ~ I tJPI ~(; ____ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ -___ - ---..- - .-
---~P\- --W-Il ~- --.----- -.- H_________________________
~- 'f~r _.- - - -- - -- ------- -.- --- ---jes~c?n-y------------- ---
_____ _ __ m..-:__ ~_u ----AvallaD1e------ -- --------
-- - - - - ---- -- - -- ----,,-- ---------.. -- --- - --- ---..- ~---------- - - .-
__u_~ ~-t4.~------.:;f7- -- --~------- ---- u______
______.__ ____~'Z_C!M..b-__~_~___~~--.--. -- -- -- .. -. ----
~ f....6 () - ., ~
==_~-=_~_~ _ . -_WiiJ.~:--- ~~_ .~~.~ ~i. -_I: ~ -:- --
__ _______ _~h ~---!1--~- SM_4_"1:~__2_~3
=:~:-~~:::/Jb_~ _~ ~-~~~~=:k_~ :.,- flSfd~--
-------- u-()t-4-ltu~- ~ i- ~ ~-~~------- . .-
__uu___:..:: -o.~-J:.,_-'~ -----~- Iv- -~-- t ~ - - ..
____ _. _ r~~-~ - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -
__u.. _____ _ . -' __(JLI__~u~/lJ-kL'JJ--ut.du.~- ..
---- ~- . - ... . - --If)-~ r.~. (f1'fl'1i ~ - u_
---~-- --- - -- - .--------------- ------------------------- --- ..- - - ----.
..M:-l _~ ~4~~'1r MlJ/hJ t.f/...L.--tL~ -~ -~-----
___u- ---- , lUi:t:1t -l ~ e~--~ J--- .
__ ___ ___~L----- ~ ~2 ---- ---- --
--- --- _u .. - - _u --- - - H ~ ~tJ~- -~-~yt S-J.;L J -.
__u"-___ . ~--k C~ig - - -- -- --- -- -- ~ -
______u_ :JL~-~~-_-!!---~ - . --
1)1l~ --:-;t;M---~--jJ4ildJ!1- ..--
. u~-~(~~J ~/- -----~
~_.__..._----- - ... - ~- ....- ----'"'-~----- ---~"'---~~ - --
Parry, Mark
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Fierce, Lisa
Tuesday, April 27,20041 23 PM
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Gerlock, Chip, Clayton, Gina, Parry, Mark
update on station sq Inflll
we all met with rlchard zengall and brlan murphy on friday, aprll16th, we raised and discussed many Issues, brlan and
rlchard Will be contacting us with a revised plan based on our meeting, next meetmg IS may 4th at 10 am
Issues discussed
1) design
a) step back IS Increased along cleveland and enhances bUilding
b) pool relocation to cleveland street Will provide more sun to area
c) parking garage screening/view of ramp - very open especially on east Side of bUilding - need to show how bumpers of
cars Will be screened
d) windows - sizes and proportions are not as pleaSing, blankness on northwest corner of bUilding, no heads or Sills
shown (especially along cleveland)
e) less of a "cap" delineated on top of the bUilding
f) materials - appears to be a reduction In % use of quality materials
g) balCOnies - question about If they are recessed
h) details/finishes - overall less details showns
2) access/parkmg
a) no pedestrian access through the bUilding,
b) too many access pOints on laura street (three shown, one approved)
c) Side access on east Side of bUilding IS In conflict with parking spaces In that area
d) public parking spaces now on three floors (not two fully dedicated floors)
e) deliveries?
f) parking for retail managers?
3) use
a) wrap around retail, both east and west Sides of bUilding, IS Improvement
b) reduction In retail square feet from 15,000 to 10,000 IS a concern (thiS was a condition on the development order -
brlan read thiS as a maXimum, not a minimUm, and
thought It could be reduced)
4) process
a) changes shown Will require review/approval by cdb (cannot be conSider minor amendment to level two)
b) reVised plans to be submitted for our reView, also Will prOVide a list of changes from approved plan to new submittal,
dImensioned elevations with floors, list of development
order conditions that cannot be met (e g sq ft of nonresidential use, etc )
Lisa L. Fierce
City of Clearwater ASSistant Planning Director
"sa f,erce@MvClearwater com
7275624561 phone * 7275624865 fax
Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan - GO BUC(K)S!
1
! I
., I
.' I
'<{ ,
I
I ~dL S~~r~ ~~
4- ~ ~t\dp.'l~\s
lrsl mV{tJUJej _'
~'(\L 't: ~~vMb ~(tA.<? Issues 4---)1(e, &.d.L (')SueJ
~v . .
eM Loa ~ -h'vY(} ~ui - ~dNu.J ~ ~~N-
~d1~"~! ~ ISI l~'u~ frCDV jOY'L)
1ln~ .
bxlO..L fed VY1~ -Rom. -att--~ -6 ~ &di
[JY' $~ <:, "3
D cay~~
14 UNb ~Bw-r ·
: \ ~ v1ki1 ~ ~ ftot;(~ ~ fO v(M-~
:' \ ~ ~"\e~ - \'5~ U
I
~(Q%r\ . ~
I ~ wif&ovJS\~d rl)~oY\\ - ~ io ~uJ
I' . uvUJ {(J~
. f'fVJ{p{ r OOVYIc:. 0. (ot. In\. fr ovtf ~
urui-.
GG
CD
rFY~~~trrL
w rrJwJ )
f?-f!-dL
~Q[).~
~ - --b ~ 0.&& ~ fLVtJ1)l\~
Q(cOl at ~(Ar(j/
eest copy
Available
~..
--
~ J. I _ --;;:---/:7, -&-n '
tD.P- -=? kss-~~ =rILM- OYlgl~
-- J1i! - fJ 7Jn:-:lI-~O-~
___ - ~_t'{.w~ -IS sef~_ ~ VVVNJI.. ~~-61~
, / ~
J[lchav~ ~~-~ ~_~cI-- fJ~ 1piL~d___~
--- ---VlJ1-&--IrL_kle-'fXbY\a}J1CL~-
. fai~ f"~ ---
-~~-- .~D
=---~ ~
~--=--=-=~~ r {iihcillCLs-artdlU-=- -=~_ =~=--
--:____ ~\-IA-~v<1~~ 'IS (OVl(Lr.fjLfh:L-U~ _:_-=--=
- -________ -L~-a~l:Y\- __::J~ ~lt~ ~_oo_ ~_
~ , ~
=--~___ neITVtvlfS - wlU-_~_]i ~=- --=~~_:=_=~
-- -- ___'9Cl'(NL w~_ ~--------Best-C-QPY- _ _. ___ _____.
. Available
:~~~~- .. k~~s-l~~~ --=----_ -- .. -:_--
__ _js.\-:_~~QO(~:2-:==-_W__~~\0_~tt~_____ _ _____
------- ~ *. ------------- ~ - -----~-----
_____ ____~__~~~\CL'SW~~--\}I\ I ~~~ ____
J-W"1~a.._- Lst __h@_Q{L{~~_dUL_iiQ___ _ _____
_+-.J: :th1IoDl~_~..m~ mWM ·
"'
,
.
.5
I
-> i ~ {o 'IV-t US 'Ust 'Rfic1JJ
II ~\~-t U~ dJ~~ rtr(\ ~ ftOtH ~~~!. ~ ~
i: JJei~~ t~ &a(t~~
i ~\e- C61I O-~~ mGt~ SRW(fll aJJ)vv-t ~
j W\ f\d rvJ .
i~ \OW sti~ ~ w\\dt wmkwJ--Traws.
I
I
I
II' ~ 2~~"7 ~~6-v d.Q0J:1~
~i AuS' vrR ~b lne.duhO
I]
II'
1
I _
eest coPY
Availab\e
,if
...
_Af' ~? 1-
t~~_
-- -4-5 _ ___ ____ _ ._. _.
(!)f.(
- -- -- -- - ---- -__ __ '0---
(~a.c Ir
~",.... ......---- ...-- -..------~... ---- ~
_J .___L$_~_J?~~~u-
-- __ +t4,.~~ _ ~,.. _~ _;;e __
_?-"--{Z~_-!I:!-- -rbe - CII-f? - - ____ _ _ __ _ __ __ . __ __
--.-- _ ~_{"#.oo ~1__y2~~ i:~~_ ),~_.__??: _ R-/: _ ___ __ ___ _. __
__t_G L -f!. ~__ ~-: _ ~l!:_ ~ ~~~__-_ (.. _~ _'!. ~_ ~~"'_Q. ~....?_J. __
$". c?r- :0.. J r - J I P: ~*PI:.
---- -----__~ __'C' _' _ _ ~ ___ _
___"__/!.."( pn_1=-~.'~__ _ _______.
___ _ 7.__!! p.,~)_--::- _ 1<:''': _ __ _"- ~.,,-- .1;4.-, _ Q1 ~ _ I~_~.
r ~
___6~ _ ~t.2__$ .J'fb.ck _J.J" (_ _-:. .J)> _ .1" r$"
- -- --.. -- ---------- -~~.. ..--
-ftY.-e!....J.:--~...J,.,.-__ / a - 'fZ~17-l,..,.f.j;,~ _ ~ /}~_ ~ ~...;.
...---- -------- -- ~
-- -~ .... - ..... .. .... -- -- --- --...
----- --~-_....--- ---------- ~ ---- - -----... - -- --
---...,~.,- --------..--- ~_. "'-- --- -.. ----... - ..
-----------__...___.. '1f _~__...._
--...~---... - ---....----- ---~~-
--- -- -~ --- ------- -----..
- - -- - -- -- ~_..- -... -- --
- t coPY
ees -,able
"'1a\
--- -.....- - ~-- --......----...------..--... -...--....-
~ --- - ---... -..---~-_....-~---_-~~~ L ___.. _ _
- ---- - -..- ---------- ----- -.. --------------.-.
- ---- ...--- -------------,-'---.._-------- ~ - -- ... -- --~
_..._.............~-~...~-"----- ------
~ _ _ __ 6 ... _'""-_ _________
-- ""'--<.-...--.--- -- '" -------~...- ..
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Fierce, Lisa
Tuesday, Apn127, 20041 23 PM
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Gerlock, Chip, Clayton, Gina, Parry, Mark
update on station sq Inflll
we all met with nchard zengall and bnan murphy on fnday, apnl16th, we raised and discussed many Issues, bnan and
nchard Will be contacting us with a reVised plan based on our meeting, next meetmg IS may 4th at 10 am
Issues discussed
1) design
a) step back IS Increased along cleveland and enhances bUilding
b) pool relocation to cleveland street Will provide more sun to area
c) parking garage screenlng/vlew of ramp - very open espeCially on east Side of bUilding - need to show how bumpers of
cars Will be screened
d) windows - sizes and proportions are not as pleaSing, blankness on northwest corner of bUilding, no heads or Sills
shown (espeCially along cleveland)
e) less of a "cap" delineated on top of the bUilding
f) matenals - appears to be a reduction In % use of quality matenals
g) balconies - question about If they are recessed
h) details/finishes - overall less details showns
2) access/parkmg
a) no pedestnan access through the bUilding,
b) too many access pOints on laura street (three shown, one approved)
c) Side access on east Side of bUilding IS In conflict with parking spaces In that area
d) public parking spaces now on three floors (not two fully dedicated floors)
e) dellvenes?
f) parking for retail managers?
3) use
a) wrap around retail, both east and west Sides of bUilding, IS Improvement
b) reduction In retail square feet from 15,000 to 10,000 IS a concern (thiS was a condition on the development order -
bnan read thiS as a maxlmum..not a minimUm, and
- thought It could be reduced)r-- I
4) process
a) changes shown Will require review/approval by cdb (cannot be consider minor amendment to level two)
b) reVised plans to be submitted for our reView, also Will provide a list of changes from approved plan to new submittal,
dimensioned elevations With floors, list of development
order conditions that cannot be met (e g sq ft of nonreSidential use, etc )
Lisa L Fierce
City of Clearwater ASSistant Planning Director
hsa flerce@MvClearwater com
7275624561 phone * 7275624865 fax
Suc;';;;;;;;:;~ 13 PO, ?:~~d/)~
!(V1~~~~)
~ ~iv ~h~ t<, % Ck M tre ~~
1
a
u~ Lf1c:r1 fA/n~!6bl ~ 4"~~Y
D Pcur~ {)let f; t(clfft<<) ~ Ri1 c.
--4iL~ffL - - _J71b!f1'J~-_~~ /
~_:-- -=11 ~~1iMJ~_-~~:-_-:lI!Qtt!JliQu - .J#~biiu~,uu~-_
~--~~-~~- -- ~- f21?l? _ -~f9 ~~_ _fm_ ~tJ ~~ -_~~ = ~ce____~f!}!Z- ~
~~=~=~- ~_=~I11~u~~_=~~==~~_
~~~ ~- =- ;B - U~~CiM~~~02J=IJ@ii~=~~__~n~~~~.~___-~
PUI:_1!5 7irrJi&iiu~t_~ii1iiiru;;; AJ(gc7~u~-
_~_= === ~_ ~~~___~__~_{[fh!Yl:8~~ _ '1(?_Z: ~-:~_~' ~~r~}- ~ _.=r!:!/2:'j~_ Cj':'rJ~ ~ _
.=-=~ f 6!!1i;Q_J!?~ J~I!:? i('J ~=~ T~fJJ?JIr!tL~-19=~ I?{~/~~_
~~_~ =_~=~__ ~f:~1!D~~QOC5 f t~ ~
~-~--~=~~~-~~- - -~----~~= ~=-~~~~=~--;;!-~--~----=~ ~-~~-- -~~~~=~~-=~==-
- -- ---~ l: =fl!JtH~~ ~fY}Jilif~tl_Zf2~_=!?~ ~.~~_=~ _
.- - u~ ~- .;tt,-
o --= ~ -~f-\'=-
. . --~(-~. ?jLB~Z2(;;jt~ &iJk:Lf!Z:{J~rf1- . -~__: ~:- _. .
~~~-_:JO_~-?fQL-11~__,~_-_=_-_~-=~ =~~=__'
~---=---=<::IC;:r_- - =:;.,.-~----==-----=~=--=- --=::;r--..1:-.~_- _~~~~__~=-_~~_-,,;..""'" --...;>-"- ___~........... ~=~
__~ ~~-=_~-=_ -_---.-- -_ '-...o_~ _~_ x___.................... .:0.... -=- =-~~=_~~ -=-~~=~_...
coP~
=~~~~~===-~--~~=...t.;-~\e--~ __~~~~~.~_~~J_=~~~ ~
,.. '1.\\a
-=-==--~~-"""""",......-".. ~"""""'--=_>lL-""'-"""""'-~ _~~~~~-...:'lO--=--....-----zz.. ~'""'""'~--"""'""_
-~~~..---~-=---=-~ ="=--""'---=--=-= """"=--=:"'" .........=-=~--::- "'""'- -...::..-~--c:--..~....:x_~__-=____~ ____... -;--..:.=r::... -=-
= -=- ---=- - --;::.=-- - - -=--::-=.. - ::---- - - .=:~=- ~~:><...:: - -..--- """-- - :::-
~ G1AA. 'II ~ '" ift~ '
PA- 1~1%o 10 ~M ~ ~s ..... .
I ~ ~1~~ ~ <~ 1t> Pv~tcl ~~
, !
/W 'llw~ _~ 5D fA(lJ( . ft;tZ '~M? -
':, 1110 P~j 6Jo~ /~ ~~ ~~ A-urft
'J LN r~ -; _ -
tw ~\jP~ 1D ~ f71D LN A1A6M~ ..-
:l.\
vVlSl1~ 1D ~ tJU)t ~rY1rYll-rfYI~~(PA- ::0 I4CiJrcw
j\17if- ()e-0'~~:neA1fU- tDrN, CaIi~E:,
: ~! W[A8'nb 1t>(L 171LS ) P *1~,fCN( 1/0 - UptL Jtl f It1/ t1f!-_ -
Jl1 PlL-(5 Cc.qv/ 1D W Ptca u( fJJf Q"A): WlLINlfyyj6
~~1 ~ ~tRP()f{ ~tAfUJtJ.~ I, : .. - ---
,~~]~~ Wl/trl!-t1if'{b ~~-. -- --' - -- -
- 1:iJ,l - .
!~-~ --
\:Id
- ,-~ - y- j~~- - --- - - - east coPY .
_ "~jll. _ __ _ _' ,. ".\\ab\e
III1
- - ~:~1 r - --- ~- ~ -
t1~ - - -
10 III
'~1 --.- -- - - p
~________ tl. - - - -
/~~
~-.~j1~- - --
~
.._--_...-"'~ ~ --
--=-------
'....
.
.
flerc;e; Lisa
-l
\
/
From
Sent
To
Cc
SubJect
Stone, Ralph
Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9 38 AM
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Akin, Pam
Phillips, Sue, Wilson, Denise
RE station square - one condition Issue to be resolved
I think we all generall agree With you, however we also agree that they are the ones dealing With the marketing Issues, If
they have a buyer that wants a door I am sure one Will be Installed, If they have a buyer that wants to sleep In the living
room and use the bedroom as an office that Will happen also, thiS was a level that we need to trust them on, thanks for
your and lisa's help on thiS
---hOnglnal Messagemh
From Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent. Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9 23 AM
To Stone, Ralph, Fierce, Lisa, Akin, Pam
Cc PhillipS, Sue, Wilson, Denise
Subject. RE station square - one condition Issue to be resolved
the rea 'ion that we asked the questlOn 1~ that a "~eparate rusclete bedroom" to us l1llplted by defl1l1tlOn to
lllclude a dOOl-'iO that the room is totally separate Slllce no onc 1ll plannlllg was 1ll on that ruscusslOn, we
\vanted to a~k
For the lecold, I dunk wc are mak1l1g a ml~take lllnot requltlng a dOOl-these Ul11ts are beconung mOlC and
more ltke a hotcllOom fhanks
Cyndl Tarapam
Plannlllg Dltector
(727)562-4547
cynru tarapal11@MyClearwater com
hmOnglnal Message-----
From Stone, Ralph
Sent Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9 10 AM
To Fierce, Lisa, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Akin, Pam
Cc PhilliPS, Sue, Wilson, Denise
Subject FW station square - one condition Issue to be resolved
Bill addressed thiS last week when we were diSCUSSing the room Size, we are not gOing to prescnbe whether they
have doors or not, they do have to have a separate, discrete bedroom, thanks
---hOnglnal Message--m
From Harriger, Sandy
Sent Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9 06 AM
To Stone, Ralph
Subject FW station square - one condition Issue to be resolved
See below
Sandy Harnger
562-4039
Executive ASSistant - City Manager's Office
hh-Onglnal Messagemh
From Fierce, Lisa
Sent. Fnday, January 16, 2004 12 41 PM
To Harriger, Sandy, Phillips, Sue, Akin, Pam, Owens, Reginald
Cc Tarapanl, Cyndl
Subject station square - one condition Issue to be resolved
1
.
.
,bnan murphy wants the condition requlnng separate bedrooms to read separate "sleeping area" (no door shown
on plans that were emalled this week), planning thinks It should have a door
our code does define bedroom, neither does bUilding/housing code according to kevln garnott, webster's definition
of bedroom - a room furnished with a bed and Intended pnmanly for sleeping
need any comments on this by 3 pm so I can send final word to bryan - thanks
Lisa L Fierce
City of Clearwater Assistant Planning Director
Itsa flerce@MvClearwater com
7275624561 phone * 7275624865 fax
Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan - GO BUC(K)SI
2
--------
---~.
---
.
----
Flercej Lisa
From
Sent
To
Subject
Stone, Ralph
Fnday, January 16, 20049 13 AM
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Brumback, Garry
RE Station Sq Unit Size
No we did not require this reduction, this was the number they sent descnbed for those Sizes, they may be confused about
the number they applied for, feel free to contact them to diSCUSS, thanks
-----Original Message-----
From Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent Friday, January 16, 2004 9 09 AM
To Stone, Ralph, Fierce, Lisa, Brumback, Garry
Subject RE Station Sq Unit Size
I thmk what we are trymg to figUle out IS If Beck agreed to a change 01lf you reqwred a change m the tIlL\:-
speCIfically a reduchon of 5 of the 790 square feet umts Please clanfy before we call Beck Thanks
Cynd! T arapam
Planmng Dtrector
(727)562-4547
cyncl1 tarapam@MyClearwater com
-----Original Message-----
From Stone, Ralph 69
Sent Thursday, January 15, 2004 5 05 PM
To Fierce, Lisa I."
Cc Tarapanl, Cyndl, Parry, Mark, Gerlock, Chip ~\l(
Subject RE Station Sq Unit Size r /
/-
Ilsa regardless of what they indicated today go ahead and use what they have formally applled"tor, I would ask that
you give nick or bnan a call to confirm, If they have revised to reduce the number of smaller Units that would be
fine, hDwever please check With them, thanks ty
-----Original Message----- \ ~~ \ f
From' Fierce, Lisa I I y(\ \ ^ I \
Sent Thursday, January 15, 20044 57 Pm.. u \J ry.;'
To, Stone, Ralph / 'j . \~
Cc' Tarapanl, Cyndl, Parry, Mark, Gerlock, Chip V
Subject RE Station Sq Unit SIZe'
I
~IS IS a bit different than what we have on fll~ part of the application
12 Units at 706 sf, .-.~ ~})
24 t 790 sf total 0 6, nits under 800 sf)
90 Units between 1,071 and 1,300 sf,
4 units at 1,466 sf, and
16 Units above 2,100 sf
(total Units 146)
could you please clanfy your unit numberS/Sizes? did beck give you something different today?
working on speCific language (conditions) to achieve limitations on unit Sizes, tlmeframes for rental, and
separate bedrooms, we will also require any change to the number of units that are less than 1,000 sf to go
back to the cdb (this IS consistent With the code and changes to a level two approval - we Just want It to stand
out as a separate condition)
I Will forward tomorrow
Lisa L Fierce
ASSistant Planning Director
1
........,1 ~
CltYOfClearwater-PIi!gDepartment ~~PN/ f~ -' c~{o~ ~
note new ema1l address - !lsa flerce@MyClearwater com ~A ~/./ () _ \c..,......---....>
7275624561 phone * 7275624865 fax ~"'n \ '0 ~ I - A 0 fl~ f -tV . II.,)
Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan '0 dJ~ r /fVlA ('..JY
GO BUC(K)S' G ii~'v
--mOnglnal Messagem-- / " ~ fIluJ
From' Stone, Ralph
Sent Thursday, January 15, 2004 3 58 PM ~ \ (
To' Tarapanl, Cyndl, Akin, Pam, Brumback, Garry, Owens, Reginald (,)A'
Cc Arasteh, Mahshld, Simmons, Margie, Fierce, Lisa, Wilson, Denise, Phillips, Sue
Subject RE Station Sq Unit Size
hared their pricing and units size list with us, summary IS /
the only units priced under 200 k are the ones under 1000 sq ft, they feel strongly that there IS an entry
level market for the smaller Units, In their two current tampa projects they have Units at 900, 800, 700 and
600 sq ft , they indicate these Units are the fastest sellers, given the limited number of the smaller Units
we can support thIs level, conditioned on all units haVing discrete bedrooms, re the potential for rental,
after several calls they have agreed to a minimum rental period of SIX months, thiS will resolve our concern
about the potential of transient use, both ray and nick also felt that the condo association would be
concerned about shorter rental levels
therefore we need to do the following
1 the site plan conditions should limit the number of units under 1000 sq ft as stated above (Ie 12 at 706
and 21 at 790) all other Units should be over 1000 sq ft, we are not plaCing any limitations or direction on
those Units over 1000 sq ft,
2 there should be a site plan and D 0 condition setting a standard for rental of the units to no less than
de../~ 1 SIX months at a time
G) ([f;/ (~re should be a site plan condition and D 0 condition that requires all units to have a
pf I discrete/separate bedroom
11- il A YSIII has been briefed on thiS and he felt these were fair conditions and he also Indicated he supported Unit
~ YSlzes that would provide opportunitIes for lower salary employees to afford,
Thank you all for your comments and concerns,
()-
\,y
m--Onglnal Messagenm
From Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent, Wednesday, January 14, 2004 11 37 AM
To Akin, Pam, Stone, Ralph, Brumback, Garry, Owens, Reginald
Cc Arasteh, Mahshld, Simmons, Margie, Fierce, Lisa
Subject RE Station Sq Unit Size
'7v tY- ,r
c~~
I agree WIth Pam'b conccrnb regardmg the mcentlveb and rema111 concerned as I was when the
Plan wab adopted regaldmg lettlng a me be a )Ubtlficatlon f01 mOle of the same use Pelhaps we
could cap the number of the small and very <;mall urut<; to a <;maller portlon of the total plOJect,
hke 15-20o;() or lebs They are currently propob111g 25% of thelt total uruts (36 of the 146 total)
to be the bmaller urutb
Cyndl Tarapam
Plannmg Duector
(727)562-4547
2
i:... ~ ~~
cyndt taraparu.Clearwater com
.
.}
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Akin, Pam
Sent Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10 29 AM
To Stone, Ralph, Brumback, Garry, Owens, Reginald, Tarapanl, Cyndl
Cc Arasteh, Mahshld, Simmons, Margie
Subject RE Station Sq Unit Size
The concern we had at the outset and the reason we established the 1,000 sq ft minimum was to
make sure that the units encourage long term stays If rental or preferably owner occupancy I
think these units are destined to be Investor owned rental units They are willing to deal with our
regulatory concerns about length of rental The question for us IS whether this IS the type of unit
we want to prOVide cash and density Incentives for
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Stone, Ralph
Sent, Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10 10 AM
To Akin, Pam, Brumback, Garry, Owens, Reginald, Tarapanl, Cyndl
Cc Arasteh, Mahshld, Simmons, Margie
Subject' Station Sq Unit Size
I believe all of you received the emall from Brian showing that the units will have separate
bedrooms and the unit count for each Size, rather than scheduling a separate meeting, would
each of you send me your thoughts on the unit size Issue, fYI from my perspective, given the
design and unit count I do not have a problem with this approach coupled with a limitation on
the length of rental (Ie 3-6 months), these units would prOVide an opportunity for entry level
homeownershlp for people at a lower Income level,
Please send me your responses by the end of today, thanks
3
~ Clearwater
~
.
TO:
Members of the CommunIty Development Bo
\
LIsa L FIerce, AssIstant Plannmg DIre tor
MEMORANDUM
J~/
~1JJ1 0
.'
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
January 20, 2004
Two condItIons have been amended and two condItIOns have been added m the Staff Report
submItted to the Board for the January 20, 2004, meetmg as reflected below The condItIOns
have been renumbered accordmgly and are marked wIth an astensk (*) They have been
revIewed by the applIcant and are acceptable
The Staff recommendatIOn for thIS case contmues to be for APPROVAL of the FlexIble
Development approval to permIt a mIxed-use development and a bUIldmg wIthm the reqUIred
SIght VISIbIlIty tnangles along Laura Street, reductIOn of the reqUIred number of parkmg spaces
from 388 spaces to 226 spaces, an mcrease the permItted heIght from 30 feet to 158 feet and an
mcrease of the permItted denSIty from 61 dwellIng UnIts to 146 dwellIng UnIts by usmg 85
dwellIng UnIts from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan area PublIc AmenItIes
IncentIve Pool, as a ComprehensIve InfIll Redevelopment Project, under the prOVISIOns of
SectIOn 2-903 C, a ComprehensIve Landscape Program to elImmate the reqUIrement to proVIde
foundatIOn plantmgs, under the proVISIons of SectIOn 3-1202 G, WIth the bases contamed m the
Staff Report and the followmg amended condItIons
Amended CondItIOns of Approval
1 That thIS applIcatIOn be effectIve upon approval of the Clearwater Downtown
Redevelopment Plan by the CountywIde PlannIng Authonty,
2 That thIS applIcatIOn be effectIve upon development agreement approval by the
CommunIty Redevelopment Agency,
3 That the permItted uses for the fIrst floor retaIl area mclude retaIl establIshments that sell
or lease goods dIrectly to the consumer such as a book store, gIft shop, antIque store,
flonst, clothmg store, VIdeo store, an art gallery, gourmet grocery store (whIch may
mclude accessory sales of alcoholIc beverages), prepared food for off-sIte consumptIOn, a
restaurant wIth accessory sales of alcoholIc beverages, and a SIdewalk cafe as accessory
to the pnncIpal retaIl use,
4 That the developer shall actIvely market and use hIS best efforts to obtam tenants for the
fust floor retaIl space as one or more of the allowable retaIl uses as descnbed above
Should the developer be unable to obtam an allowable retaIl use wIthm one year of
Issuance of the temporary CertIfIcate of Occupancy for the retaIl space, the CIty may
allow, upon wntten request of the Developer, one or more alternate uses to occupy the
fIrst floor retaIl space,
5 That the followmg uses be prohIbIted
a All uses prohIbIted by the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan,
b All other retaIl uses not speCIfIcally defmed by the Development Agreement as
allowable retaIl uses or alternate retaIl uses, pursuant to the CommunIty Development
Code's defInItIOn of retaIl sales and serVIce,
c NIghtclub/Bar,
/
'f
d AlcoholIc Beve! Package StoM, and ,_ :... o-,,'rf\ll/A~
e Medical or Vetennary O~fl e~'(\>J' !. /" _ r I ~ /l v# ~ f/
6 That a mlmmum of 100 and maximum 0 46 d"lellmgs umts be located on the slte/md,1Y'tfV~
that no umt be umts less th n 1,000.q / ross f)oor area be lImited to 36 Ilmn V ~
total with no more than 12 less t n 750 s' uare fe , ~ ,un/'
7 That the rental of umts be a minIm f:- 0 s<.a I (tC y'
8 That all UnIts be desl ned with as arate,/6edroom:-* ~ {~\Lv1ible,
9 That the project shall contam appro ate y 15,000 ~e wable etml use~).unl12..
(as defmed above) on the first floor, -1- r ,1I/f}. v-t.......r
10 That a mlmmum of 100 parkmg spaces be made avmlable to the pubhc per the l; "
development agreement, tv /~.-'
11 That the fmal deSign and color of the butldmg be consistent with the conceptual
elevatIOns submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff,
12 That a complete permlt applIcatIOn mcludmg site plans be submltted wlthm SlX months of
the purchase date,
13 That constructIOn must commence wlthm 240 days of closmg on the property,
14 That the Certificate of Occupancy be Issued wlthm 18 months of the Issuance of buddmg
permit,
15 That the apphcant submit the fmal detmls of the "gnU work" to Staff for approval pnor to
Issuance of butldmg permit, and It be deSigned to screen vehicles to a height of 3 5 feet,
all 'lehlcles m the bUlldmg be completely screened from Vle'.v from the south and west
Sides of the subject site, *
16 That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, pnor to the Issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy,
17 That all Fire Department reqUIrements be met, pnor to the Issuance of any permits,
18 That all Traffic Department reqUIrements be met, pnor to the Issuance of any permits,
19 That payment m heu of stormwater faCIlIties be pmd, pnor to the Issuance of any permits,
20 That a fmallandscape which matches and complements the landscapmg proposed for the
Statton Square Park redevelopment the Streetscapmg Plan be submitted to and approved
by Staff pnor to the Issuance of any permits,
21 That a fmal landscape plan for the west Side of the Post Office site be submitted to and
approved by Staff pnor to Issuance of any permits, and mcludmg wntten permissIOn by
the Post Office,
22 That all sign age meet the reqUIrements of Code and be hmlted to attached signs on the
canopies or attached dtrectiy to the buddmg and be archltecturally-mtegrated With the
deSIgn of the butldmg WIth regard to proportIOn, color, matenal and flmsh as part of a
fmal sign package submItted to and approved by Staff pnor to the Issuance of any permits
which mcludes
a) All signs fully dimensIOned and coordmated m terms of mcludmg the same color and
font style and Size, and
b) All sIgns be constructed of the highest quahty matenals which are coordmated With
the colors, matenals and architectural style of the butldmg,
23 That the furniture used for the outdoor seatmg component of the restaurant Will be of the
highest quahty and that no slgnage of any kmd Will be mcluded on any portIOn of the
furniture mcludmg but not hmIted to the chmrs, tables, planters and/or umbrellas (and
submitted as part of a separate Sidewalk cafe apphcatlOn), and
24 That all of the above conditIOns are applIcable and fully enforceable for the lIfe of the
butldmg
\\MS5(\PDS\Plalllllllg Departmen^C D B\FLEX\Pelldlllg (alel\Up for the /lext CDIf\J3eh her N 1750 GTE Federal Credu UIllO/l (IRT) (C1RP _
retail lalel)\Memora/ldum re ame/lded (()/ldUIO/I\ #2 + #1 12 16 m doc
1
fII
--
Page 1 of 1
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
bnanmurphy@beckgroup com
Tuesday, January 13, 2004 4 43 PM
Owens, Reginald, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Arasteh, Mahshld, Akin, Pam, Stone, Ralph,
Simmons, Margie, Matthews, Douglas E , Johnson, Gary
nlckpavonettl@beckgroup com
Station Square
Please see the attached pdf It contains preliminary floor plans for the one bedroom units smaller than 1,000 sf
· Unit A 1 on the left IS approximately 706 sf There are 12 of these units proposed In the project
· Unit A2 on the nght IS approximately 790 sf Thesre are 21 of these units proposed In the project
These units were placed In thiS project to meet a specific pncepolnt We designed these units to be affordable to
the people working downtown The pnclng of these Units Will be ~EWJ:!~~OOO The FannleMae definition of
affordable housing IS $322,000
The units have a pnvate bedroom In addition, the minimum rental length can be Increased to three months In the
condo documents In order to help alleViate any concerns that the units Will be rented to transients
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me Thank you
Bnan Murphy
Beck
5100 West Kennedy Boulevard SUite 250
Tampa, FL 33609
813-387 -5336
Better BUlldmgs, Better BUilt'
\
1/13/2004
\
\
.
,.
--.r-
\J.nkl It. t~ 1- "
1 0 tv I!1 L ~l\I\i
- ---~ --
~ r-l't] ~~__ ~
'III~~ r--I
-~j ~I ~
1-='1 I::L
I en:)
I ~~J
II ,
~
i-'\lJ
_ _ \ I, J
I"
--
unit A2 ( 100 tv)
'~I l) r1 J~
I
r II (f. . "'~
} ~).
11- "I'
I
_ i
\
~
--
, ,
r~
I'l-/l
1---lll-1!
u~. - __L j'l-~II
, _ _ I If,~~
~ Irl &j I:;>. 111:"'1, : -: -,
· - 10 I - - - J
\ ___ ~~l-
.....-.... I
'.
~-I~I-"
J!
I
IL _p
I J
~ I I
IlL I~'(
,I ._J1
III ~--=,t
~I ---I --
,L "
~
I '
I '\
~.i--
jU,
,
~/I ....- _........~,.,,=.....:::::-__~"'~...............
_t copy
Avallable
------
------
~oL{
~
-~~~~~~~m1o~ ~
ffttlN J7f/lffPif11 10M/) t'DtATrj (((Nfe(~,e arc)
~tOAt 5QLJ~ IIYf!LC "'J Co~y
Available
fA UlJlr 0/~ I fJl5D[!J (IU f),l?u~flJI!l9Ivr !f{JtJ[/[;J!VJr
av1 ee1J7lV~ (it,uL Loff fIj'% TDOt-i(
e A- CfNtt3tZ&) nt1t7 17JE:f:e f\JD 7 D'Te !JD/2./1I! U;J /1> j
l)JJ1 0J1vr TTZJt1J~ ~ /l/tUe- \ v0,~ l!J !f1/A/J
~A) t /&C ~~ (Pt7Fq) /(j) ,~tnZ/~
, 1
1;vU:C Ul/7\J1 I, hr6 vltwm 4') !rP~rm~ 6r.i)G!
I-;t; II Y {p UN 11'7 (f, L 070) Is t Lro/ Jr )fv1~ U /lJ r1S
~ rnf1Jct ~l fI=- dr 17tP~
i00 11jJS l~ /tN (j!U7f7\f Ci1l1 (Clft~/~ -']lJr;:J'C-
f11Jr1 f'/6L~r3t~ U/&GG /1rf~f3;,
f;t1 lG r0M fw ft~ fL < / !Y/~fC.M' SJU!)v/
I . I
~ G-t~/L- (0 U-~ 11~ fUrL~ 0, (1r5 CUl0f/rl'f GF)
f c 60~ fflo /11 brr5 tf2"Srfl~ L.. <3D!) s Ct/IJfV/ \
t
f-o t?OJ( lJU,ftN( UJ (l put:Are- () AI I
'Dl ~1\.<1) 0 DDa: ~ WlJ flu t:-?o ()AY Uru -rfIL- ~
I Y ~ DJN ~ftJr To ~ 11f.A1\J~11f1\J1- (}u(T 6JrB~~
, 11
f.:M ,(f(~ .)M ftl.eE8 ~L{JDk- 9JVL
120 ()J1t,0 1rZvt t2t---t,,~ 5~ / S7141Z t/IJ S-(~ 0, 'lJ
,
~7'~ l?KJ]
m~ c;Ju, ~) tzv/AJ tJ.Ef2/21 /1- TD tifE- [rlUKA. ~r
C03rJri.eAvO S'T <j~.!1--UL I ~, ) 11/1'7 I S '
tv D I ~rvJ erH7 lVJ6 rr/7fr etJ~ {Nfl; -rrte 0f3;U I ~/f:IV7
_ ~y t1J12- U TLuTl ~ ?
tJri-w R-f/fl2f;90&JiA776J '~/n Ao9S(tJA%-7I-ftJ/Il(/ffS~
Al nits f~ U~
/VlI\- -/i7''rN()) \ 1&~ S{~({ I~ /!;>M TvIL rtz) (31V6'7/"I ~
--
fet? '0!l2 ~(Z-L/" M)J~1/ he ~Ji:r~'r~ rrc--_
iI~
~ JCzflf (G fVl1l; ( ~ tJ}tl/ bI ry) U 51 U Co;JZ L.
Nb f)U7A n. --7 J1..^~ ...U\cl ~Tf+1lwJ YJ I j Irf2ff.- fAfet)
9i~.8HsvA
if JAN 'J '71lf Lftt; I f},(2..:(
[~ 7D OL~USS CO/b f/ZF~ !f77Al w8N
,
,
-
I
-
;' , ,
,
,
-
l
.,
fI'
.
Page 1 of 2
/j
Fierce, Lisa
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Owens, Reginald W on behalf of Owens, Reginald
Monday, January 12, 2004 2 49 PM
Parry, Mark, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, lisa, Clayton, Gina, Akin, Pam
Harriger, Sandy, Phillips, Sue
RE Staff report - Beck Project
Mark
We can address thiS tomorrow at the QRT meeting With Beck - Will that work
I do know that from day one they have shown some smaller units on their submittals
Also, the request for a metal decorative gnll was more for aesthlcs, Instead of having cables I do not think
anyone thought that they would totally screen the cars - difficult to do an stili maintain the air flow necessary for a
structured parking area
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Parry, Mark
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 2 42 PM
To: Owens, Reginald, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, LIsa, Clayton, Gina, Akin, Pam
Subject: FW Staff report - Beck Project
I got a comment back from Bnan Murphy With Beck He cannot agree to two of the conditions of the
Staff report (one of which IS stipulated In the Agreement)
Please adVise - anyone
See below
Mark T Parry
Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
727 562 4558
mark parry@ myclearwater com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: bnanmurphy@beckgroup com [mallto bnanmurphy@beckgroup com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 20049 56 AM
To: Parry, Mark
Subject: Re Staff report - Beck Project
I have reviewed the Staff Report and have the follOWing comments
~
~'
~
'V ~
Currently we have 36 units ~
~
Conditions of Approval
6 We can not commit that all units Will be no less than 1,000 SF
planned for less than 1,000 SF
13 The south and west Sides of the bUilding Will have decorative metal gnllwork to conceal
vehicles I can't say that thiS matenal Will completely screen the vehicles from view
1/1212004
,
fII
tit
Page 2 of 2
/
Please contact me to diSCUSS these Items Thank you
Bnan Murphy
Beck
5100 West Kennedy Boulevard SUite 250
Tampa, FL 33609
813-387 -5336
Better BUlldmgs, Better BUilt I
"Parry, Mark" <Mark Parry@myClearwater com>
To '''bnanmurphy@beckgroup com'" <bnanmurphy@beckgroup com>
cc
Subject Staff report - Beck Project
01/09/200401 23 PM
Brlan,
Here's the Staff report Have a look and make sure that all the condltlons
are groovy
<<Cleveland 628 Staff Report new format doc>>
Mark T Parry
Planner
Clty of Clearwater
Plannlng Department
727 562 4558
mark parry@myclearwater corn
1/ 12/2004
...
I
I
C'
COLONL\L BANK.
_nr
I
I
Jun~ 10, 2003
I
I
Mr NIck hvonetn
Drrector of Capital Solunons
The Beck GroUP'
5100 W Kennedy
Sutte 250
Tampa, .fL 33609
I
I
Re. Stal10n Squa,rl') Park CondOIIlttlJunl Project
Dear Mr PavonetlJ.
I
P)e~ h::llhu 1~1u:r $CrYC all an t:;qm::>slcll of tmcrest jn nnaru::lDg till: ::'UbjC'::L tOO WIll ~W1dlJtIllJJ.lwn
prOJeCl W. bl: located m downtown Clearwattt
I
TIns letter should I.D. no way serve to eOmEl:llt Colomal Bank to any specific fmancmgl>., but should serve
Q11ly as all expressIon of jl)tf!fest The developntent would I?e revla'lJ,-ed by the Bank and subject to normal
u.n.derwntrng guidelines
I
I
Tharik you fur your mtrn:st m Colonlal Bank. We look fOTWard to the possibility ofw01"k:Lng on the
proposed proj act If you ha-ve any oth~r queel10ns regatdmg the above please f~l free to contact me at
(813) 314-5285.
Smcerely.
I
I
~
Joseph E -Tagg3n
Real Estate Lender
Best Copy
Available
I
I
I
I
I
An AfiW.are of The Colmtial &ncOI1:iUp. Ine.
400 North Tampa Sl::reet, Swte 2500 'I'ampa, Florida 33602
Telephone 813122.1-3800
......._____ __l__-_TL__I_ ___
I
I
I
I
I
'II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
Stat on Square Development
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
PROPERlY AREA 42,124 SF =
PROJECT AREA (NOT INCL PARKING)
PARKING STRUCTURE AREA
TOTAL PROJECT AREA
FAR
APPROX BUILDING HEIGHT
100 FOR SALE UNITS
RETAIL AT STREET LEVEL
PARKING STRUCTURE
109,000 SF
9,900 SF
261 SPACES
967 ACRES
-I I t1,""UU SF
123,650 SF
242,550 SF
~
1034 DUIACRE
70 UNITS
30 UNITS
SUMMARY I AERIAL LOCATION MAP
urban
studloarchltects
UNIT BREAKDOWN
lYPE A I BRlI BA WI DEN
lYPE B 2BRl2BA
~
I ,000 SF
I ,300 SF
RETAIL BREAKDOWN
SMALL SHOPS
RESTAURANT
5,100SF
4,800 SF
Best CQPY
Available
E9
-
I
I
I RETAIL
SMALL SHOPS
I RESTAURANT
TOTAL RETAIL
LEVEL I SUMMARY
'I PARKING
I
I
I
-
I
I
w
:)
I z
w
I >
~
I z
w
c
I ~
~
I C)
I
I
I
I'
I
LAURA STREET
w
:)
z
w
>
~
~
en
~
w
urban
studloarchltects
5,100 SF
4,800 SF
9,900 SF
~
EXISTING
PARKING STRucrURE
ON-GRADE
PARKING
a..
::::>
a..
L
~
I
1
\
RETAIL
1900 SF
EXISTING
POST OFFICE
EXISTING
OFFICE BUILDING
ECH/
ELEC
RESTAURANT
4800 SF
RETAIL
3200 SF
.
LOGGIA ·
_..... _...... _... _____ _ _ _. _.... _.JL _... _....
CID
~f:t-p, ~
~
(
Stat on Square Development
SITE / FLOOR PLAN-LEVEL I
I" = 40'~0"
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OPEN
TO BELOW
Ii
a..
::::>
a..
L
~
LEVEL 2 SUMMARY
PARKING
7 SPACES
-- --t
Cl
a..
L
~
CLEVELAND STREET
Station Square Development
urban
studloarchltects
FLOOR PLAN-LEVEL 2
I" = 40'-0"
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LEVELS 3-5 SUMMARY
PARKING LEVEL 3
PARKING LEVEL 4
PARKING LEVEL 5
z
Cl
a..
L
~
z
Cl
a..
L
~
a..
::>
a..
-~ L
~
CLEVELAND STREET
Station Square Development
83 SPACES
83 SPACES
49 SPACES
urban
stud loarchltects
FLOOR PIAN-LEVELS 3-5
'" = 40'-0"
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
LEVELS 6-10 SUMMARY
UNIT TYPE
A-IBRlIBA WI DEN
B - 2BRl2BA
AREA
I ,000 SF
1,300 SF
#
70
30
TOTAL AREA
70,000 SF
39,000 SF
109,000 SF
TOTAL LIVING UNIT AREA
A
A
B
B
A
B
A
A A
A A
A
A
B
B
A
A
CLEVELAND STREET
Station Square Development
urban
studloarchltects
FLOOR PLAN-LEVELS 6-10
I" = 40'-0"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
UNITS
UNITS
UNITS
UNITS
UNITS
PARKING
PARKING
PARKING
RETAIL
CLEVELAND STREET SECTION
CLEVELAND STREET ELEVATION
Station
Square
Development
CLEVELAND STREET SECTION AND ELEVATION
I" = 30'-0"
urban
studloarchltects
I
I
//;\
,/ \
/l/ ;l\;~\
/ ~ ;-~ \
// ., \
l' \~\
,':1' '\\\
~~-~ ' \\
I.N1ROIDU:CTION
'~ ~":.f. ,J \-."
_ ~, ,-" 'It- :J.r ~1'; ~\:::'
-- - r ~ f t4 ~ \ l" \
" "~. //"~ \\"
"~- - ( } ,~~\
S Ar '" \\, to
n~ tudlo chltects IS please 'o;tsubmlt to you, thiS In rmatlon package about
~~~fi~sjp~nal pr,clctlce f9r1ryo,~~'r~~i~w ~e appr~~~late the opportUnity to present
""i I~m,-'lan~!to 'J;Jtroduce>;,94rgplofesslonal staff, 04,~)deslgn capabilities, our work
. ,,< --'f!Cat,ons&' 11>1 I ~ \~ .
. .)1 :lL ,II I . ... '--.~~\ .
on I~to"bl ' onclse anCt lI,(Q) lI,U U ~'~ addressing
e~u'ifJ?r, ... .:"''.~ "'- '" "\'ih I ~1'rriJ?<r~an~ ,'0 s~)~ctlrg ,aIr:! Architecture Ilntenor
chltecturejlr [td~wOr.ltl J our,grojectsjIIThls:ls tHe same philosophy we use m
,>,~es,g'n~g(~a!1Rti~n~~rS!" ifSin~sS P!Jtctlc~s'''Y~IJch ~1I0r.r~ ~s tf) provide our chents
'!P_~ hlgfle~t ,quah!y~~,erYl~elt!!at.~eets thej specific needs\of,l~ach project These
~~/ "-,f.1J ~ kl~~~-1h~ III ~,. ,~..'Pf' h~. "" II" I I II I
U~les~h~e,fofg~~~~~~re C\LlOJi\S lipS w~~,bulld"W1tri our clients, relationships
'il ' !Hilt~~ '~;'(i)!laf9pj1Jjntie-t~fos~lr~the growth oU~ finn, alorg Wlt~l'creatlve 'project solutions,
:::'~I ,!~'-i\ ~~tiat~t;iavet'mneai.us"'our re'putaltlon;aS4 one 10!tthe~lea'dmg deSign and Architecture
I~ P;, i 2; fJr" ~lf"-";'> ,-""';,'!"''''~'ibW r., \/U'I P,'@, J i < \ H~ I ~,I
'y "-';"''I'"4''.['<l=o ;:,.~. ""' ~ - I J.&'I.; I f ~~ \ , n~~
1'4.':'~'';: Y"~J..-'!\~, u~ . r "'~.... K I -. - , "'~"-\"l
~' .~,;!,~. ;r~J.o-'J#~" ~~'*~ P1 f ;~~~ '1.:11\. ." F - \ t --=-~ I ;i!" r'
~~ \'. ~,," -. '1" . f ~1 Jfc:.~''ffr~i . ~, ~~~I~~ t~e rr-~At ~~f~c~v~ l~erv.l,.c~\utlhZJ1~9 ~? bes! p~ople t ..!;' fP~J
I~~<.... =,~~s9<)fur~~..\ }RLQj~CUs,'ml)JY putrV'~ldO It ng)ht tl11e first t..lm~ Q..y _ ",;: ':",~
"~ ~.;~\.. -t!IPj~~~~~r;l1tlll.: r.l~ -1.. fl.l~ns~ 9!,tg!?9,~~,a~s,gn'w'~h fun~t'q~/and budg~t~;p'~r lQ.e~forD ----~-- .J:-
fu~ '", -; ~ erv'ceslls'f'!4[~spCi,)nse'tQtthe tll1'telC!_ntJ creative enern~ we Will provl.de{to-achleve --
It~;~ ' Jr' 'at~~ll:;ff,cht,~fb~i,~~w,ur;~\,te;1ime and mob~Y"1on t~IS pro)~ct as well as l
't:,.~",~ ;... .. ~ r.~\to\,p'rov.lde--more;accurate<'ifnd effective service ~ 'I ~ rC"l 0 #'"",
f';-'i"""",~ '>= -'-"'. Ii' -(1 ~: fj~~r;l;.~:tJ~. I ~'I ' " LJ J' '
,..i- .,.~ 1~~~""1 f't',.~ ~-.:no;..~ JP ro1 ~,.. tJr
~~~&~ ~r;\~'~ .. ~}tJ1:~l~J.rv _--.. "C4~~~ " 'l:l~,' ~~ ,[ .0 [J ~ ' ,
I'~ - .. ~_~~t~dI9 Architects stands prep~r~d to"Pt~vlde our..professlonljil servl~
l~ " any ar:]~ allscheduhng needs an~ to offer the highest standards 9f deslg
~ I "i~ 'p 1;j'. :<"11('tfi~8r\, 1 I I ~ I d --...., = I.......
11- ~J't''' :7' roCtuctlOn' to iCreatella;-project-tlill at Willi ~xGee your goa S
- 'i:.. 1~, : ~ ~ ~ ~-<- -':-..J . F;-,,]''!6.~!ti; \ r I /.. "-~~r __ ~ 0 [J
""'- (-=- I' exp~e:rat-i-9Jl.s:-:w!~gr~atIY a~pr~S:late ~~~_r ,t'm~land_~o~r-efforts I
c~f\~ld~~atJon of U,rban ~y(jlo\Archltects to be selectE;~~asl a rr~Dfi!r~;}'o~r:-
~ ,tea , ~L!d,.,w_e-lo.oJ~"fo~ar; ''A.o,ut!ile p'q~entlal offor!:'1tl1tg~~~p~sl,ne..!j~lel
I~_ ~I ,YOtl pr;ojects';""It'";t,5 ~"' ~~.~' ~ I -"f ~'Il"l, I jT!"~-r
- ~1\'11l-""'~J.{'~ -f, - ~ - I >, L,c f f!..r.
j (J, fI' ~~ to- ., ....JJ ~1 ~rlf.e.rJ ~
I i ~'f-- : " AH:-;:- ~ ~ .'~ ~',""", ,in' J"IF'" l"" ' I. ~J;l':
-----'\~Ij- __ ;t ~ _ - ~ ",,-..-1 t_ L '~~~ ~~ - (~I.T <i *J;J..,,~~-",,"
) I~- -'I<-'",2Cj".' ~"t "'" ~ ~\~~"1 ~..",r'l;---:,' =-c- __
J' ~.,."",!. t'~Jib~ - \t~f""' ',)I- ~ .-=>,"'t Ij.-~... t "-;-t';\tt'~ ~ > =
.-:I~ i - "~~!fr~ T,.:r~-~IT _~'ll1IY It/ ...1'~_~_ ~_~_ L
-Wr ,I ~.......~~ ~..~l,nJ-i:# ~7- ~~l ~ '-SA'I 6~' ~- ~
~ -- - _'i~' ~ ~r ~.<i--(~...f""....... ~_____
= co ."-'~~_____________..
-~ - ~
-
1-
~
I-
I .... ..
L~..
I
-~
o -
-----~
- --------
-
--~~
~- ~~\ ~
I ~
--
- :..:...-
I
I
I
I
II
.i
I
I
~
~
~
~
I
I
~
I
~
I
~
I
1"- 'f"~-
- ~J I
I
I
-,
I
~
I
,l,
I :'
I
-~
'i~
,
I
1 L - ~ _ - -i~~~_ , _
- Urban Stydlo ArChlt@CtS, Inc -)vas formed In 1989 ~s a full~~rvlce Architectural, Spac
--- Planning, InterLqr Design practice to provide Ruallty ~Jnd creativity In design an _
Implementatl _1~rChl!eciural prOjects As a IUI11_~-u-e--and dynamic
corhbll1atJon of exp@nenc~s ~nd talents, our four partneri'billckey Jacob, AlA, Richard
Zingale, AlA, Ana-Ii~belo ~allrapp, AlA, IIDA, and Bq~n ~ammond, AlA, bnng their <
own perspe~t1Yl!P~ Individual style to the firm Each ~rtner has practiced Archltecture-
- In Tampa for.;gv~~~-p years, and our client base IS the r,esult of the time we have spent
~ bUilding stnjl~~OnShIPs that malntiln high s~andards
~ Currently,,_our staffitotals twenty empl9yees (including the partners) dedicated to
provldlng;the nighest quality Architectural service to meet the demands and needs _ - -
J of each cl~nt ~~I-av~-s,ppPlementedlour tale~ted staff by automating our office r~ -.
With AutoyAD Vef5I~~ 2002'to produce all ,projects ~nd enhance our ability to ) 1
,J~ iBl~ -:;:( rlLf I )d~ of our clients Additionally, we have available - -=_~ --
consultant~ to sup-pJeme~t services as ~ project fI,ctates, Includuilg estimating, 3-D ~= __
, ~ computer reJderlln~-and In-slte constrlfctlon serlces :, 1 ] ~~I ~
r Urban Studl? A~chJtects IS unique In that each partner practices, architecture With ----~c-
I dl rect hands-or -gLj.gance to provide quahty servl~e on alii aspec\s of every project' _ ~ _
ThiS "studlo~~ concQpt of practice l1asJt,llowed us to prod~ce over 2,800 projects and~ --: - _ n
.. deSign ovef'11 '1T1!I1~on~_~S1ua~$~tEf=!pace In th,HeenY;~af~l It I~ our dedication ~o-r _~~ ~ a
~, the pursuit 5talllilhlY g~_~!gn ~nq ~~p'IC~ that.!l~~[led to~ tl'!e1n:'any long-~erm ;contInUl,ng c:.. : ---=--l
relationships WI~!LIDaJor qheAls su~~h-a~;/~~1Pan~ of~mj}!'t;~, ~The WLlsonl Company, - - 1 ~L
_-_ _._ Crescent Resource~,e/ns!..,gm~,lS'!rr1JWJfj~/al f;{O_URi P-JlrC!ge'L~roUp, ~obf!ttJ/Y~_"CBatrCt~ _
" ~ & Co , Ban!ce'l ~t Lykes Lm{!s~ ~lJ1-fl1!C~~a $,hIP~, Qpope1(S 8. Lybr~fld., Jqp_e~_L~n9, - - :----_::.t--,
f.~~ LaSa~/e, and]~!tfeb_ifns ~rstaurant o~r~~:o,p~~ ~~~p~~ctl~e !S~Sm~~I'r_-:,'qe~ar~5-=cc~-J _-~-
rt J -=~ dedlcated~tQQ(jr PJ~Slce of archlte~!Mr!!, Wf} (!rl:(j~ldl~,iited to 2U[chents-, and--- -~~
) we are dedj~teirr~~ '-~"'~~!utlons t'la~pr?vl~~al:ae f?r _~oyr s~-rviC~S==~=--~rl'~:=-;-
that never comprom~~ ~ 10- ';"}, ~ ~ "~'S,! ,l~;'1 ~I '- ~ - =-1 t --~ _ ~y "=-~=-_~-' I!~
- ~~J~~~~t~~r~~Q!snnfJ!~i~\~' U~t~~21';;!u~~~~SJei~t,~,iil;~
talents but strengthen_~d our ablllt~ __ _eJlI1tncacles of gethl1g a-prqject =;-~_ ~
constructed These two endeavors"'mu .hand - a job we feel we are well~---~-.i~--"~= .
.. 3-,,"~ ~ ~ - '<"- - ~ ~.,@ ~~ ~ ~ - 27 - ~:..- _
-', sUited for and _fe are~ to accompllst(- "i - -~~ - ~ -
I ~ - ~_:~~-:~<:'1f~ I~ ~~~ ~- - - _ ~~;,-
~- ~,i2~b_-_~_IJj.~~_!-i.i_r~"-- ~ . ..
"'-'5 "'"-~ i:~ _-~ -
~i ~=L_ ~ - ~ \ - -~-
r ~ ~ _=~ ~ -~ j~ 1
L
~-I
.====~~
~-- ~=~ =.,~
~ -
I
I urban
Istudlo-,: ' .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.;:':;t:.. ,.~~:~-l~'
~.' ._~~
'r " ~3~4'1
, I ffl"1r1
.. i Ii (rt~'.'il i \'
~'i~~\\
~---~
Profile
Urban Studio Architects, Inc was established In 1989 as a full selVlce Architectural, Space Plannrng,
and Intenor Design practice The founding partners, Bnan Hammond, AlA, Mickey Jacob, AlA,
Ana Rabelo Wallrapp, AlA, IIDP. and RIChard Zingale, AlA, have all practiced architecture based
In Tampa, Flonda since 1980 Our practice reflects a continuous evolution of project types,
resulting In many long term, repeat client relationships We continue to grow In both people
and projects as a result of a commitment to excellence In design and Implementation that best
serves the needs of our clients
People
The profeSSIOn of Architecture demands that we creatively solve particular problems
Within the reality of economics and time Urban StudiO Architects has developed
ItS practice to accomplish thiS by drawing from the talent and experiences of a
diverse group of IndiViduals who make up ItS staff Our studiO environment fosters
creativity, construction expertise and commitment With Vitality As clients become
part of our process, they share and contribute to the creative solutions that
ultimately produce work that distingUishes us In our Industry Our shared commitment
IS to proVide results that exceed expectations
Aspirations
- Promote a better-bUilt environment
- Strive for creative and technrcal excellence
- ProVide responSive, quality service
- Access IndiVidual commitment to produce mutual success
- Promote continuous development
- Encou rage professlOna I Integ ration
I -~-:> ~,
! ~-~
I '-~ t -.....,.,.'- 1 _
~ ~-.) i~ ~~..,
~'-- '"'-- -, - -'"J[ ~ - - -~ ' ""
--.l. , ~ "'~
I r "~~, "I!~-'_
........' - ~("'-
;:- -~_ ,---=0 _ -~___ - '"I"-~-'~ ,,- --
'-~:- - ~- "-- ~~-:I ~~ ~ ~~ -
~-~-_ '>.'-~-~--~gERSONNEL OVERVIEW
---~ --'-~ ,_ ~j , :jk~_ ~ -- _,
- - _, 'L lJ? :" ~ ,_
- - -, _, 11 _" ~ ;' , .r ,
-',- ~-". - II" - H .:;. i ~1~ 1 ,t ,~f ,1
Urban Studio ArChitects! throughout Its.development has en~eav9{ea fo-~~qUlre the"
!' most profICI~~t, tale~te~land d~dlcated people to become ~~:~!lt,f project team IWe
I operate In a shlld~o eIl1V~IJ"Oll1mellll~ that encourages InteracJlon of staff, bett~r
I i commUnication and a project process that promotes creative solutions.
I 1,1 - The staff at Urban Studl~Archltects IS tJm~d to ~tlllze our st'udlo e1nvlronment to hone
- c their professional skills and expenence, to react and adapt tojany prOject circumstance
[ uSing the technical knowledge that our; vaned staff offers jAs a firm that practices
I; - Architecture, Intenor Ar~hltecture and Intenor DeSign, we staff a v~~lety of people With
: ~ different project strengt~, allOWing us to tackle any proje~t situ~ion effectively
[ Each project IS assigned a project manager workmg day t~Jday on the project needs,
I reporting directly to tfie P~rtner-In-Charge of the project, who ~yerse~s the entire process
I A project team IS then assembled based on the specific peed~ (of the ,project and the statf
will be assigned work tasks that utilize their specific -expertise or expenence It IS a
_ - process thaJ ,t!as worked for our: firm and allo~s us th~JI~#IPlllty to react qUickly and
I effectJ~ely to the fasCpaced de'11C!J;1ds_-of,y'Qur Rroject scl1eCiule Our ~l;Iccess has been
based on our ability to understand the entire process and to provide 'Rersonal service ,
1.-' - With one:person'as thelpomtof contact, -that[helps us to be efflcleii[(!'f,;our-project=;'
I__-OL....-.--productlon, offers better commumca,tlonr~_nd th~t b~llds a trust With oui' cll~nts In oLir-
abilities I 1 ~ __J _ _
'> I ~ \ .---- __ _ _ :...
I [IDQlJOOcQJoITO@ [?~[lQfj@~~,[ lJ~ andl-PIOVI~~fig-th~s-tY;:~f personal service ;5 ~he
I catalyst of tlie growth and success of Urban StudiO Arcl1ltects. We understand the cllenfs
I needs, the bUlICilng's needs, the financial nE~eds; the deSign needs, the technology needs
and the schedule needs and we produce projects theit satisfy these reqUirements and
I that creates aesth~tl~, functlo!n~1 and successful sofutlOns for our clients
I
~/,
I
I
I--
I
I
I
I
II
~
~
I
II
IL
I
I
lj
,
"
~ ,I
"
r~ IJi"-
r
,
At urb,n-Sti.l(il~ Architects, we are committed to proVide the best available
personnel to offer the highest quality service that produces creative solutions to the
~aesthetlc, functlonal,~fln~nclal and scheduling demands of each and every client
.-:
.-
.... -...,.. _4c"" ...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1508 South Howard
Tampa, Flonda
urban
studloarch,tects
~ ;"...
~ ~ r I
: I .,
- - - 11 _ _
[' I
IIII~<~ :. I D, .~!..
]1 LI fSJ~:- t I 'I I, ] 'L-'
--=_I,P=__U --- . I r'
I~).., ~1 I_~J h- IL_ - ; I'
'L: I t=' '--1
l L - - --'-- -I _f ----l.--1 1:- __ _
· Nine town homes with a distinct modem edge
. Tropical architecture with urban flair
. Recalls hlstonc brownstones In design
. Elegant, angular extenor adds a distinct tWiSt
\'
,1
fa:
fil,
655 North Franklin. SUite 150. Tampa FL 33602. Tel 813 228 7301. Fax 8132291981 . LICense No AACOl902 . wwwurbanstudlocom
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
urban
.. -u j I 0 olrc hit lilt: tl
The Madison at SoHo
Tampa, Flonda
. 2001 Golden Aurora Award winner
for "Best In Show"
· 2002 H1l1sborough County Planl11ng CommISsion
Community Design Award wnner for
Outstffldlng Contribution
. Urban nfill multi-family housing complex
. Four crchltectura styes available
. Private courtyard areas
. Attention to pedestnan scale and human nteracnon
~
G'i'i Nor ttl Fr dnkllrl . ~ulte 1 'i0 . Tdrnpd FL 11602 n Tel 813 228 7301" FdX 81 'l 22g 1 g81 ~ LI< pn,p No AA COl g02.. www ur bdn,tud 10 com
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Madison at SoHo
Tampa, Florida
. 2001 Golden Aurora Award Winner
for "Best In Show'
. 2002 HI15borough CountyPlanmng Commission
Community Desl!J1 Award Winner for
Outstanding Contribution
.. Urban Infll mulMamJly housing complex
.. Four architectural styles available
... Pnvate courtyard areas
. Attention to pedestrian scale and human Interoctlon
urban
. -u j I to oLrc hit I3t ts
t
G~~ Norttl Frdnklln' \Ultp l~O 'Tw1r' FL 'l'lG02 .Te1813 228 7301.Fdx 81'l22Q lQ81...Ll<pn,p No AAC 01Q02 "'wwwIJlildn,ludlocom
I
I
I
Tampa Heights Riverfront
Tampa, Flonda
· 300 condominium Units In three towers
· 95 three-story town homes
· Two sWimming pools and Interactive water feature
· Public esplanade along the H Ills borough River
· Architecture responds to the adjacent reSidential
neighborhood by reinterpreting elements of the Arts
and Crafts movement
I
urban
studloarchltects
I
I
I
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
G'i'i Nor th F I H1kllll 0 "Jltp 1 'i0 0 T dlrqld FL 1 %02 . Tel 813 228 7301 . Fox S11 22q 1 QS1 0 L I< emp NoAA ( 01 Q02 0 www u r bdll,tU<JIO { 011I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
urban
.-uJlo.&.rchltmc:tl
..
TOWN CENTER! MIXED USE
119ACRES 140DU
TOWNHOME
101ACRES 126DU
COTTAGES - 35' - 50' LOTS
500 ACRES 450 D U
lND SINGLE FAMILY - 50' - 90'LOTS
830ACRES 390 DU
CONVENTIONAL SF - 100' - 150' LOTS
540 ACRES 140 D U
PARK / OPEN SPACE / ROW'8
231 0 ACRES
FlshHawk Ranch Phase III - Newland Communities
Tampa Flonda
- .
b55 North Franklin ft SUite 150 -Tampa FL JJbO<' .Te1813 2287301. Fax 81J 2<'91981~ L,cense No AA C01902., www urbanstudlo com
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
urban
.-uJIDoLrcnlll:mctJ
FlshHawk Ranch Phase 111- Newland Communities
Tampa, Flonda
~ " ~~~.IJ:"T I
~,..L---~~ - _\ i1 - ~ ~...a...,..s ,.. J.....rt.;-..j( J ;~,t.""
P - '\ ~ ....11 1 J I "-'r ~ ...4--~ ~r;:r=< r _ " f.'
li_(Qlt_ --". r'-rt_...:v~t\. r~i-~Jt l,.l t.;-"'_..-r ~ q I --:
\...lif".'.;.-. oJ I'_I If. ~r-- -!t.. ~ Ji't .J -~_
, li:;:, J 1 ~~, /1 - ~u
~- - --7 -/l~:;;~.~~,,-..
I.- ~ II --
-~:
r .....1...
....
WlflH PER.'JPLt' JlYL
lrFlRA1W
.\MI'ITHPAIIIl_
"'L,'\IINI,
:'WL1l1'L\1IL l
I1WR RCT,\rL
n~tl(.~
1)\ H{ RP I \ II
~
r......-~~ .!!([:'r..........-v-~\.......,.-'T"-"'""A
1--- ~'fC~!rr_~ ~-lo..-<~...-;~~-r--;l-? ~ ~i~..........,..,,...-,"-/'J
-:-0:1 -~ .....jJi 41f'fP. l~t."'" ~i4~..,.V~{" ci- L.--....~'-....'i).
~~~~~.-n'.~~_1 ;.l' ...,;:II'~,J. :lr -~,,~.& -- - ~o.J...I~~J~f
, ~ <<;.J "'t ... (j 4'\. "J: 1...~ - 1 ,., - oJ "",.. , !
,-,'~ 1 '...7 "'{!:~
101 I I , ';~l
I \~~
~~~- -
c.\~T PtRSPEfm"T
'D)W'f JlAJ..L
"I'be IAI l'A\'I\llI
OUTIuJOR
"I III 1.," M \)o.( L
AlII A
OITlce
O\"EJtRETAlL
L~WN \JtL \
INI ~ I<An I~ ~
rrn ""NTAJN
Ml L Tll ,"d.lll or
m,~RIl.~1 'II
.....-
~ Il n J~
~~
[TO\VN"SQUARE
I _ - ,
,CONCEPT
,
II1IIlIl,MI~~~I~ tv Nll~...l 'WI ~tIOOrllr,h.x.i
~urrl:4Jndmg>
F]~.IHtlll
Pcdt~ri l1El fJL(11ldl ~I
~..uV~ ~n~ JlJi~si't'e,~r\IC~~
Si tCllll, rqh:rm::IIC1l1
J", '/.. '-
llii~ro In n~lwlmrllfll1d~
itrcfiM.l1l1'i1l t(lt.'ltpmnH
~ lW'rl~l:
+:flc\ltiltballn50m \pa(C~ (MlI},lmUIld
i.c~tllh" c~~lt\~ ~OIJ;'1]:011i'~)~
;;'"^{ tIl~ ~.,.Y t" ,-. ~t r I ~ 'r
*\~l~"'IJ~ :fuLlCtl~8'i;'i('Il~'m.p
~ nutdfl,Clt C$J11/tyard;,GilJden cerltcr~1 i'J!1'
C) i~l in;;; jl1' dldlllf'lo:r 1.1. ~ Oak ,
~ OutCh.tff ~\IL n~ion 1IfT!.lllfl\Jn; JnJ
~erlllif! 5rll.~~
t I\d~ iiiw- .lti,,~ ~[1Jf~
""OHm rl'R..rl',CTI\ I'
b55 North Franklin. SUite 150 -Tampa FL 33bOL .Te1813 2287301. Fax 813 n91981~ License No AA C0190L~ www urbanstudlo com
I
I
I
The Madison at 5t Petersburg
St Petersburg, Florida
I
urban
. ....J.o:..r.:hlll:r.ctt
I
I
ft First urban Infll multI-family housing complex
In downtown St Petersburg
" 5 story apartments ald 3 story townhou~s
With parking faahtles
ft AmenitY-Intense hlghlyseaJred
Best Copy
Available
I
LJ -,
-'
J
[lj
PCoUR-H 1.I,E SCtlTH
r-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j;
=>
W
ll'l
>-
',"
~"
e::
[J
nr
-1'
t t ~
... .... '''''
, ,
I ,
'-
I-~ ~---- b"../1I ',' }L"t-
\. "I' ~t I r ,-
.,- ~; :\.... 11/ ,,~~~,
~;i "'_"").. ~~ ,:3 ! I "-~9.,
.....~ i -:;
.
I GSS N'ltth Frrlnklln""Jllp lS0...TdrTIpd FL 'BG02 'Te1813 228 7301" Fdx 811 ng 1981.. LIIP'I'P No AA COlg02~ wwwurbdt"tudlo 'Otrl
I
I
II I I l 111 W
1-' 1,-
I '{I !J q - - ..,.. E !:o...111"-
III "
~
- i
I I I ~ ,
"
! 11
- i Fi r- ~ t.-
I II-=- I I':
I
I
I
The Madison at St Petersburg
St Petersburg FlOrida
I
urban
.. uJlo...r...h,Elilct:l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/ ~ ~e;~.,. eoN
~_- ~Il )L..["''.o1~\;f F'tlrJt.....
/~ ~ "".A;J.c.
LIA~I'"-"'t'" ;,-.......... '
tfU........I-"...........-.a-l-"....~ f
~ ..:0 _~I..l .r.n.~ I
I
I
I
I
~ First urban Infll mult~famJly hOUSing romplex
In downtown St Petersburg
.. 5 story apartments Cfld 3 story townhou~s
With parking faahtles
~ Amenity Intense, highly seQJred
I G~~ N(lIttl Frdrlkllrl" '>Ultp lS0"Tdrnpd FL ,%02 .Te1813 2287301. Fdx 81, nq lq81~ LI(prl'p No AA COlq02~ wWWUrlJdrhtudlo (Orn
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
'I
URBAN STUDIO ARCHITECTS
PROJECT TEAM
Brian Hammond, AlA
Princlpal-In-Charge
Richard Zingale, AlA
Design Lead
Dennis Carr, AlA
Project Manager I Production Team Lead
Debbie Hepner
Production Team
Justin Crosby, Assoc AlA
Production Team
I
BRIAN D. HAMMOND, AlA
I
bhammond@urbanstudlO com
I
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
I
I
EDUCATION
I
The Madison at SoHo (Tampa, Florida)
3 -story urban Inflll project located In a historical residential
neighborhood
Bachelor of Architecture
University of Tennessee, College of Architecture 1980
I
Psychological Assessment Resources Offices & Distribution Center
(Hlllsborough County, Florida)
8,000 sq ft of office space and 14,000 sq ft of distribution service
space for a producer and distributor of psychological testing
materials
REGISTRATION
I
Architect Florida (1983)
ProfeSSional License AR 0009919
I
Greenwood Apartments - 200 Units (Clearwater, FlOrida)
Imaging and renovation to a distressed yet historical multi-family
project Project Includes addition of new clubhouse faCility
WORK HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
I
Mobley Park Apartments - 238 Units (Tampa, FlOrida)
3 and 4 story affordable & market rate hOUSing project on a
downtown fringe site
Mr Hammond, AlA, a principal with Urban Studio
Architects, has had a Wide range of project types
dUring hiS 20-year profeSSional career as Prlnclpal-
In-charge of Architecture HIS project experiences
Include extensive Involvement with several multi-
family developments
I
Evo's Restaurants (Tampa & St Petersburg, FlOrida)
Development of new healthy fast food restaurants
I Windermere Apartments - 352 units (Brandon, FlOrida)
3-story market rate garden style apartment complex
I Whispering Pines Apartments - 192 units (St Augustine, FlOrida)
3-story market rate garden style apartment complex
I Westbrook Apartments - 234 units (Orlando, FlOrida)
3-story market rate garden style apartment complex
I Westchase Apartments - 352 units (Ft Myers FlOrida)
3-story market rate garden style apartment complex
MEMBERSHIPS & AWARDS
Member, The American Institute of Architects
(past PreSident of Tampa Section)
ReCipient, Chancellor's Citation for Extraordinary
Academic Achievement, The University
of Tennessee
I The Arbors at Branch Creek (Hlllsborough County, FlOrida)
Clubhouse & amenity structures for upscale garden style apartment
complex
I
Pinnacle Apartments - 300 Units (Hlllsborough County, FlOrida)
3-story market rate garden style apartment complex
I The Preserve Apartments - 300 Units (Tampa, FlOrida)
3-story market rate garden style apartment complex
I Heron POInte Apartments - 276 units (Tampa, FlOrida)
3-story market rate garden style apartment complex
I Osborne Landing Apartments - 44 units (Tampa, FlOrida)
3-story affordable hOUSing project
I
I
I RICHARD ZINGALE, AlA
I
f1chardz@urbanstudlo com
I
I
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
I The Madison at St Petersburg (St Petersburg, Flonda)
Pnnclpal Architect and Project Designer for 277 -unit five story
apartments with three story townhouses above parking facIlity on
two city blocks
I
I The Madison at SoHo (Tampa, Flonda)
Project Designer for 368-unlt three story mult~famlly housing
complex with parking structures
I Corporate Headquarters CP Ships North Amenca (Tampa, Flonda)
Pnnclpal Architect & Project Designer for 160,000 sq foot corporate
headquarters
I
JOint Service Centers, CP Ships Europe (Hamburg, Germany,
Antwerp Belgium, IPSWICh, England)
I Project Designer
Shumaker Loop & Kendnck, PA (Tampa, Flonda)
I Pnnclpal Architect & Project Designer for a 40,000 sq foot law office
IBM Executive Bneflng Center (Tampa, Flonda)
Project Designer for a 10,000 sq foot high-tech Video
teleconferencing faCility
I
Side bern's Restaurant (Tampa, Flonda)
I Pnnclpal Architect & Project Designer for high-end urban
restaurant Continuing services being proVided to thiS client, as
they expand the Sldebern's concept, and In the evolution of other
I restaurant venues
Mia's Restaurant (Tampa, Flonda)
I Pnnclpal Architect & Project DeSigner for 5,000 sq ft bistro style
restaurant located In the Hlstonc Dlstnct of Hyde Park Villages
IHUE (Orlando, Flonda)
Pnnclpal Architect & Project DeSigner for high-end urban
resta urant
IEvo's Restaurants & franchise DeSign Standards (Tampa, Flonda)
Pnnclpal Architect & Project DeSigner for local health food
restaurants and creator of national franchise standards/program
I
Ovo Cafe (Sarasota, FL)
Pnnclpal Architect & Project DeSigner for an expansion of a regional
restaurant Into the Sarasota market
I
I
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture - Architecture & Art
University of CinCinnati, College of DeSign, 1976
REGISTRATION
Architect OhiO, Flonda (1980)
ProfeSSional License AR 0010894
WORK HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
Mr Zingale, AlA, a pnnclpal With Urban StudiO Archltocts,
has been the Director of DeSign for Architecture and
Intenor DeSign since the firm's Inception HIS
Architectural expenences encompass hospitality,
transportation, education, and multi-family projects
located In the northeast and southeast United States
He has deSigned numerous Intenors projects Including
corporate headquarters, law firms, advertiSing agencies,
and faCilities for computer software companies Richard
has worked With several franchise restaurant organizations
developing their brand Intenors, as well as Independent
ownerships, With results that have gained regional
attention
MEMBERSHIPS & AWARDS
Member - AlA, Hlllsborough Literacy CounCil,
Tampa Aids Network Volunteers
St Petersburg Times Restaurant Awards 2001
Best Overall Restaurant - Side bern's
Best New Restaurant - Mia's
Best Fast Food Restaurant - Evos
I
DEBRA K. HEPNER
I dh@urbanstudlo com
I
I
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
I
The Madison at SoHo (Tampa Flonda)
Project Manager for thiS 26 million dollar, 368-unlt three-story multi-family
urban Inflll housing complex and clubhouse with parking structures
I Lykes Lines Ltd Corporate Headquarters (Tampa, Flonda)
Project Manager for over 66,000 sq feet of Initial office relocation In
I Downtown Tampa
I
Pen Power Corporate Headquarters (Ybor City, Flonda)
Project DeSigner & Project Manager for thiS 12,500 sq foot renovation
to a hlstonc cigar factory In Ybor City, Tampa
The Madison at St Petersburg (St Petersburg, Flonda)
I Project Manager for a 25 million dollar, 277-unlt five-story urban Inflll
apartments and clubhouse with th ree-story townhouses above a structured
parking facIlity on two city blocks
I
Ovo Cafe (Sarasota, Flonda)
Project Manager for an expansion of a regional restaurant Into the
Sarasota market
I
PrOJect Experience completed With other Architecture Firms
I Tampa International Airport Transfer Level Renovation (Tampa, Flonda)
Architectural project team member for the re-Imaglng and renovation of the
Transfer Level including new retail and public lounge areas
I
Tampa International Airport Modifications to Landslde Terminal BUilding &
Shuttle Lobbies (Tampa, Flonda)
Architectural project team member for the addition of new shuttle lobbies
between main and adjacent parking terminal bUildings
I Tampa International Airport New Slgnage & GraphiCS (Tampa, Flonda)
Architectural project team member for new Informational and directional
slgnage for the main and parking terminals, as well as all transfer shuttle
I lobbies between the adjacent long-term parking structure
I
I
Addition & Renovations to St Petersburg/Clearwater Airport (Clearwater FL)
Architectural & Intenors Project team member for the addition and
Renovation to the eXisting main terminal, drop-off, ticketing & executive
office areas
I USF/DNR JOlnt- Use Manne SCience FaCIlity (St Petersburg, Flonda)
Architectural & Intenor Project team member for thiS jOint-use research
FaCIlity With audltonum, lounge and public spaces - located In St Petersburg,
Flonda
I
. USF/Blo-Sclence AcademiC FaCIlity (Tampa, Flonda)
~ Architectural & Intenor Project team member for thiS research faCIlity With
audltonum and public spaces - located on the main cam~us at liSt
IlL
EDUCATION
College of Arts and SCiences
University of HawaII
WORK HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
Ms Hepner JOined Urban StudiO Architects In
1997, and brought With her 7 years of expenence
working on a vanety of Architectural and Intenors
projects He r project expenence focuses on the
deSign, project management, production, and
construction administration of Architectural
projects Including multi-family hOUSing, retail.
restaurant/hospitality, Institutional, and commercial
Intenors and space planning
MEMBERSHIPS & AWARDS
Board of Directors - Gaspanlla Festival of the Arts
I
DENNIS M CARR, AlA
I dcarr@urbanstudlo com
I
I
SELECTED PROIECT EXPERIENCE
I Tampa Heights RIverfront Development (Tampa, Flonda)
Project Manager and DeSigner for an urban market rate hOUSing
development consisting of 300 condominium units In three towers
I and 95, three-story town home units Project amenities Include two
outdoor sWimming pools, a fitness center, clubhouse, Interactive
water fountain, and a public esplanade along the Hillsborough nver
I Prolect Expenence with other Architecture Firms
I Centro Ybor (Tampa, Flonda)
Architectural project team member and Tenant Coordinator for a
two-level, 224,000 square foot outdoor urban retail and
entertainment center In the heart of the hlstonc dlstnct of Ybor City
A portion of the project Included the adaptive reuse of the Centro
Espanol building, now occupied by a comedy theatre, home
fUrnishing store, and two restaurants
I
I
Hyatt Regency McCormick Place (Chicago, illinOIS)
Architectural project team member for a 33-story, 800-room hotel
adjacent to the McCormick Place Convention Center The project
Includes 13.400 square feet of meeting space, a 12,000 square foot
ballroom, and two 700 square foot boardrooms Public spaces are
supported by a 300-seat restaurant and 250-seat bar
I
I
Mall of Georgia at Mill Creek (Buford, Georgia)
I Architectural DeSigner for a I 4 million square foot super-regional
mall outSide of Atlanta The project IS a unique blend of a traditional
enclosed mall and extenor village retail With lifestyle tenants
I The Flonda Mall (Orlando, Flonda)
Project Manager and Designer for the renovation and expansion of a
I regional mall located near the Orlando International Airport The
new Identity of the center responds to the area's unique customer
base of both domestiC and International visitors
I Atlantic Steel Mixed Use Development (Atlanta, Georgia)
Architectural planning team member for the redevelopment of the
Atlantic Steel site on the west side of Atlanta's Midtown dlstnct The
I vIsion for the plan IS a Iive/Nork/play community containing retail,
reSidential, office, and hotel space, all centered around a lake
I Kopp Englneenng BUilding, University of South Flonda (Tampa, Flonda)
Architectural project team member for the Intenor and extenor
renovation of an eXisting englneenng laboratory bUilding, Including
the deSign of a new pedestnan canopy/gathenng space link to the
eXisting Englneenng BUilding II
I
I Tomatlna Restaurant (Tampa, Flonda)
Architectural DeSigner for a new prototype of a casual Tuscan-style
Italian restaurant onglnally founded In Napa Valley, California
I
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture
Auburn University, 1992
REGISTRATION
Architect Flonda (1996)
ProfeSSional License AR 00 15756
WORK HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
Mr Carr has recently JOined Urban StudiO Architects after
working at other Architecture firms In both Atlanta and
Tampa He bnngs over ten years of expenence on a wide
range of complex project types Including the master planning
and deSign of several hOSpitality, retail, restaurant, and mixed
use developments While hiS foremost strength lies In
deSign, Mr Carr's responSibilities span all phases of
architectural services from conceptual site planning and
programming through contract administration He IS also
helping to lead the firm In Innovative Visualization techniques,
Including 3D computer modeling, rendenng and animation
MEMBERSHIPS & AWARDS
Member
Amencan I nstltute of Architects (AlA)
Volunteer
Corporation for OlympiC Development In Atlanta (CODA)
Awards
Certificate of Merit, Innovative DeSign and Construction of a
New Project, ICSC Awards, 200 I, Mall of Georgia at
Mill Creek, Buford, GA
Certificate of Ment, Renovation or ExpanSion of an EXisting
ProJect, ICSC Awards, 200 I, Flonda Mall, Orlando, FL
Award of Excellence, Amencan Concrete Institute/Georgia
Chapter, 1999, Mall of Georgia at Mill Creek, Buford,
GA
Sustainable DeSign Award, AINGeorgla Chapter, 1998,
AtlantiC Steel Mixed Use Development, Atlanta, GA
I
I
JUSTIN CROSBY
I
Jcrosby@urbanstudlo com
I
I
I
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
I
Veteran's Plaza at Beaumont Business Center (Tampa, Flonda)
29,000 square foot single-story multi-tenant office bUilding
I
PAR Office (Tampa, Flonda)
8.000 square foot office space with attached 14,000 square foot
warehouse and dlstnbUtlon center
I
The Madison at SoHo (Tampa, Flonda)
Intern Architect for a 368-unlt three-story urban Inflll housing complex
I
The Madison at St Petersburg (St Petersburg, Flonda)
Intern Architect for a 277- Unit five -story urban Inflll housing complex
I
Wilson Company Apartments (Flonda)
Intern Architect for multiple three-story affordable garden style apartment
complexes
I
Bank of Amenca Community Development Apartments (Flonda)
Intern Architect for multiple affordable housing projects
I
laM Site Study "Channelslde" (Tampa, Flonda)
Intern Architect for thiS 300-unlt four -story urban Inflll with attached
retail
I
laM Site Study "Boy Scout Road" (Tampa, Flonda)
Intern Architect for thiS 300-untt three-story urban Inflll with attached
retail
I
I
Evo's Restaurants (Tampa and New Tampa, Flonda)
Intern Architect for two new health food restaurants
I
Iglehart Residence (Tampa, Flonda)
Intern Architect for thiS Single family residence renovation
I
Habitat for Humantty (Tampa and Lakeland, Flonda)
Intern Architect for 2, 3, 4, 5 bedroom houses
I
I
I
EDUCATIION
Bachelor of Architecture
Auburn University 1999
WORK HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
With a six-year background of vanous trades
In the construction Industry, Mr Crosby
began working at Urban StudiO Architects In
1999 Since then, he has gained valuable
expenence In the commercial, retail, religiOUS
and multi-family project areas
I
I
JUSTIN CROSBY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIELDS OF INTEREST
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
P ROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
LANGUAGES
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
ACCRE DIT A TION
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
INTERESTS AND ACTIVITIES
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
HOBBIES
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
COMPUTER SKILLS
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES
Place your text here Delete this text and headmg If you don't need them
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
URBASTU3
A CORDN INSURANCE BINDER I DATE
09/18/02
THIS BINDER IS A TEMPORARY INSURANCE CONTRACT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM
PRODUCER I r1l8Ntfo &11 813 -289 - 52 00 COMPANY I JOINDER "
Ir~ Nol. 8132894561 Lumbermens Mutual Casual BINDER61470
Suncoast Insurance Assoclates EFFE~ EXPIRATION
DATE TIME DATE TIME
P.O. Box 22668 09/21/02 112.01 Pi AM 10/21/02 ~1201AM
Tampa, FL 33622-2668 PM NOON
I SUB CODE I THIS BINDER IS ISSUED TO EXTEND COVERAGE IN THE ABOVE NAMED COMPANY
CODE. PER EXPIRING POLICY"
AGENCY 5031 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATlONSNEHICLESIPROPERTY (Including LocatIon)
CUSTOMER 10
INSURED Urban Studio Architects, Inc Professional Llabillty Insurance
655 North Franklin Street Clalms Made and Reported
SUlte 150
Tampa, FL 33602
I
COVERAGES
LIMITS
TYPE OF INSURANCE COVERAGElFORMS DEDUCTIBLE COINS % AMOUNT
PROPERTY CAUSES OF LOSS
- D BROAD D SPEC
- BASIC
GENERAL UABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $
I-- DAMAGE TO
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY $
I CLAIMS MADE D OCCUR MED EX!' (Any one person) $
1- PERSONAL & ADV INJURY 1$
1- GENERAL AGGREGATE $
RETRO DATE FOR ClAIMS MADE PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $
I--
i- AN'fAUTO BODILY INJURY (per pen:on) $
- ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Por ocadent) $
- SCHEDULED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE $
- HIRED AUTOS MEDlCALPAYMCNTS $
- NON-OWNED AUTOS PERSONAL INJURY PROT $
- UNINSURED MOTORIST $
$
AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE DEDUCTIBLE .-J ALL VEHICLES U SCHEDULED VEHICLES ACTUAL CASH VALUE
~ COWSION STATED AMOUNT $
OlliER THAN COL OlliER
~GE UABILITY AUTO ONLY- EA ACCIDENT $
1- AN'fAUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY
I-- EACH ACCIDENT $
AGGREGATE $
EXCESS UABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $
~ UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE $
OlliER THAN UMBREUA FORM RETRO DATE FOR ClAIMS MADE SELF INSURED RETENTION $
WC STATUTORY LIMITS
WORKER S COMPENSATION E L EACH ACCIDENT $
AND
EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY E L DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
E.L DISEASE POLICY LIMIT $
SPECIAL Llml ts _ $1 r 000,000 ea clalm/$2,OOO,000 aggregate FEES $
8w:groNSI Deductlble $10,000 ea clalm/$30,000 aggregate. TAXES $
COVERAGES F 1 r s t Dollar Included ESTIMATED TOTAL PREMIUM $
NAME & ADDRESS
--j ,MORTGAGEE ,~ ADDITIONAL INSURED
LOSS PAYEE
LOAN "
A~D REPRESENTATIVE
l. ^"~ ~. ~
I
I ACORD 75 (2001/01) 1 of 2 #7109 NOTE IMPORTANT STATE INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE KEB @ACORDCORPORATION1993
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,~'89
I
- - - - - -~- - - - -- - ~ -~ - - -
- -
1 - ..-
~':"' ~: ~;STAT!E bFf~oRIDA' , "
DEPARTMENT ,OF BUSINESS AND PROFE:SS:i:ONAL REGULATION
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND', INTERIOR DESIGN SEQ# O,1{
- ~ "" .- .. '"
: · L I CBNSE NBR "': -: - '. .:
I ... ~ - ,'"' - - - :;~ '-__;;:. ~ .. ~ -:_.,;-
.. "..,.. IJ""" ,
~OOl 00026721 AA ~C001902 _:~- -;' - - \, -"
~ ITECT CORPORATION '~_- ~:~--' ~:.- ,;. ~= ".. _0 -_ _ -"<.: 'I
below IS CERTIFIED ,- -- " _ '- - - ::--. ---.0-
.. - ~ 1 .. r _\ , .. r ~ r'"r"'-
ihe pr,o:visi.~-':l~ of -Chapt'e4f;(~81:0,f:S_:,., _>.. _~~ _:, ,
iRon date: FEB 28-, '2003,-~_II.:::- I ~_ -.:.: r'J - M;-
.. ..... .. ..- .. -~ ;,::!~../..I ~i - r - :.. II I -,. 11..'::: \" ...
.. , .. \~"to 0-( ill I - 'I .. . I ~... ;........ (.. I't
I ""\-:; (:..1\..1,.(....~.. -~ v l~ ~
.. - ...,. -.." ~ ... - ~. ~
.. "_101-' 1" .. [1_ ""-... 'r
~ ~ ~
I .. _::;:-; _~$. - 'J-' -~ .I ,- - .I. ...
.. \j.... j_ 1'1.1_ J .. I" or;....-
....... f ) lo: J ..., I r ~ :- _"
..
-
(
- "
, I
STUDIO ARCHITECTS# INC.'
~lNRLIN ST #; ('150 _ ~.
.--~-- F~, -'33 602,
I
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
.' ,
..."
'.
, '
,
-....
, ,
.. ... (..
- 'DISPlAY AS.BEOlJiRED BY LAW:
K-IM BINKLEY - t;
, . - .....sECRE-T-AR~
Best Copy
Available
I
I
I
The Beck Group II
I
Our History Throughout our histOry, Beck has nurtured a culture that
encourages experimentation and questions the process,
while continuously striving for excellence This
environment has afforded Beck a reputation as a quality
organization that gets the Job done right
I
I
I
Henry C Beck, Sr, with two partners, founded a
construction company In 1912 called the Central
Contracting Company This organization has evolved over
the years, Including moving ItS Texas headquarters from
Houston to Dallas In 1924 Only one year after founding
the organization, Henry C Beck, Sr bought out the other
partners, but maintained the company name until 1946
when It became the Henry C Beck Company In 1981, the
named changed to HCB Contractors, and remained that
until 1998 when the company changed ItS name to The
Beck Group
I
I
I
Beck has completed projects of varying scope and size
such as The GTE Telephone Operations Headquarters In
Irving, Texas, the Museum of Contemporary Art In Los
Angeles, California, the USM Regional Headquarters In
Tampa, FlOrida, the IBM Tower at AtlantiC Center In
Atlanta, Georgia, and the IBM Command Center In
Denver, Colorado
I
I
I
Today
In the past, Beck proVided one segment of the delivery
process - construction Today, Beck proVides one
complete solution to our customer's needs We have
grown hOrizontally through the years to offer many real
estate-related services such as deSign, development,
finance, and construction services to owners, users, and
Investors These Integrated services are proVided
nationwide and In MeXICO With offices In Atlanta, Austin,
Denver, Los Angeles, MeXICO City, Orlando, PhoeniX, San
AntoniO, San FranCISco and Tampa
I
I
I
I
Our primary focus IS to seek long-term relationships With
our customers Our success rate IS high, last year almost
90% of our bUSiness volume came from repeat customers
ThiS Impacts the way we think, the way we are organized,
and the way we work Foremost, It means that we
embrace the customer's perspective, sharing their
concerns and their objectives We strive to overcome
Industry IneffiCiencies In order to develop a faster bUilding
I
I
I
Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
I
I
I
II
I
process, as demanded by our customer's time to market
needs
I
In dOing so, we continue to look at the way we do
business and look for opportunities to provide new
services
I
National Presence
Beck has been In business for 91 years and has offices
located In Atlanta, Austin, Dallas, Denver, Fort Worth,
Houston, Los Angeles, MexIco City, Orlando, Phoenix,
San Antonio, San FrancIsco and Tampa
I
I
I
-
~--"T==~?~
~--~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Resources
The organization IS comprised of quality people and some
of the best In the Industry We have built projects In the
state of Florida for more than 70 years Our FlOrida
Regional Office In Tampa opened over 18 years ago It IS
a full service office, staffed With more than 110 seasoned
construction professionals, and IS fully eqUipped With
state-of-the-art Information systems
I
I
I
Better Buildings, Better Builtm
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
-t~~ ,,,J- _ 'r ~
FLORIDA ~ *J
REGION (
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
II
The pnnclpal-In-charge, Sam Ellison, IS also a Beck
Managing Partner and as such has the authonty to commit
additional personnel resources from within Beck's Flonda
staff, and, If necessary, from the national staff to ensure
the success of thiS project
We have a strong, local estimating staff trained In both
conceptual estimating and on competitive bid projects We
spend considerable time staYing abreast of labor and
matenal costs Our staff conducts a thorough analYSIS of
bUilding matenals and sub-systems on every project to
determine both Initial and life cycle costs We provide the
cost of alternative systems and components so that
practical, cost effective design decIsions can be made We
also maintain a significant volume of comparative data for
similar projects
Beck's resources Include
SKILL GROUP TITLE TOTAL NUMBER
Managing Partner 1
Operations Manaaer 1
Estlmatlna 4
Business Development Manager 1
Capital Solutions Manager 1
Project Managers 16
Architects 3
Engineers 35
Supenntendents 17
Field Enomeers 9
Communications 2
Project Office 11
Manaoer/Accountlno
Secretary 6
Safety 3
TOTAL FLORIDA EMPLOYEES 110
POSITION NUMBER
Accountants & Cost Control 56
Clerical (Includes Clerks, 91
Secretaries, & Administrative
Assistants)
Architects 42
Engineers 176
(Includes Field, Office, & Project
EnQlneers)
Estimators 18
Executives 12
Inspectors 5
Insurance 5
Prolect Manaaers 121
Safety 16
Schedullna 16
Superintendents 132
TOTAL EMPLOYEES 690
The follOWing principles descnbe the foundation of our
culture They are statements that lead and motivate us to
be the best we can be, and thereby ensure our customers
receive the best value In cost, schedule, and quality
I
I
I
I
I
NATIONALLY
I
I
I
I
I
I
Company Commitment
I
MISSion
II
RevolutIOnize our mdustry create the future'
I
I
I
I
I
I
VISion
An environment where extraordinary demand for Beck's
superior products, services, and innovative solutions Will
result In unique and rewarding experiences for our
customers and our people
Managing Directors
Henry C Beck, III
Lawrence A Wilson
C Ronald Capps
Jerry D Cooper
Kip E Daniel
Rick del Monte
Charles S Ellison
James A Gettman
Paul A Johnson
Arthur P PerkinS
Pat P Priest
Charles P Shelby
Frank N Spears
I
I
Better Buildings, Better BuilU
I
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Executive Officer
BUSiness Development
Human Resources
Architecture
Arch Itectu re
FlOrida District Office
Western DIVISion
Western DIVISion
Arizona District office
Chief Financial Officer
Real Estate Services
Eastern DIVISion
I
I
I
I
Construction Management
and Construction Services
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Staff Capabilities
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Better Buildings, Beffer Built~
I
III
Beck's reputation for quality construction projects IS
unsurpassed, as a Construction Manager or General
Contractor We know the construction process can only
be successful If the process IS a well-orchestrated senes
of events DUring the construction phase, we Will direct all
of the construction activities by first planning, and then
executing the plan Since 1912, we have cultivated
relationships and alliances with subcontractors that bnng
true benefits to the projects we complete
Our job does not end after construction We prOVide a
Wide range of post-construction services from faCIlities
training to our unique 11-month walk-through
Beck performs an 11-month walk-through on every
construction project completed The Beck project manager
comes back to your faCIlity 11 months after construction IS
completed He Will walk the site With you to go over
anything you are concerned about or any warranty Items
that need to be addressed before they expire Should any
Items need attention, the project manager Will coordinate
the work before the warranties expire We are dedicated
to exceeding your expectations
The beck staff can proVide technical services required for
the follOWing
. Options AnalYSIS
. Design Review
. Budget Estimating
. Value Englneenng
. Life Cost Cycle AnalYSIS
. Construction Scheduling
. Quality Control- Design and Construction
. Constructablllty AnalYSIS
. Cost Control
. Change Order Negotiation
. Claims Management
. Project Close-out
. Transition Planning
. Security Systems
I
I
I
I
I
Relationships
".....- .0
~~'.~~.~~UJ]~.~rtc
- [I ;n~iil'l -fl:,g'".", --=. -
~r~-~'~~' :~~~'
. :. ;< r r .. - " '.' , _. -
. . r ., ,"" ~~.::-:...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
'/ r ,
;:fl~~~~;i~
,;~;~~',w"nw, """"",""
I.... ,
I
I
I
~:-~~::-:."~~~
I
I
I
I
I
Beffer Buildings, Better Built~
II
A repeat customer IS a testament to a successful
relationship, which the followmg companies represent for
Beck Customers with · indicate five or more projects
Allstate Insurance
. Amencan Airlines
Amentech
Aon Risk Services
. AT&T
Austin Independent School Dlstnct
. Baylor Health System
BELO
Bnstol Hotels
Capitol Chevrolet
Central & Southwest Services
CholceCom
Clgna Healthcare
. Clnemark USA
City of Dallas Parks and Recreation
City of Keller
. Coca Cola
. Computer SCiences Corporation
. Cooper & Stebbms
Corporate Property Investors
. Crate & Barrel
Crescent Resources
Cnswell Development Co
. DFW International Airport
. Dallas County Community College Dlstnct
Dallas County Hospitals
Dallas Zoological Society
Delta Air Lines
EqUlfax Insurance
Farmers Insurance Group
. Federated Department Stores
Fellowship Church
. Fidelity Investments
Fnto-Lay
. FUjitsu
. Georgia Power
. GTE (now Venzon)
. Gulf States Theaters
. Hams Methodist Health System
. Harwood Pacific
. Hlllsborough County Schools
Homart Development
I
I
I
I .
.
I .
.
I .
I .
.
.
I .
.
I
.
I .
I .
I .
.
I .
I .
I .
.
I .
.
I .
I .
I
I Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
II
Honzon Healthcare Corp
Hospital Authonty of Houston
Hughes & Luce
Hyatt Hotel Corp
IBM Corporation
ICG Telecom
Interlocken, Ltd
JCPenney Company
Kaiser Permanente
Lenox Park Development
Lockheed Martin
Macon-Bibb County
Maguire Thomas Partners
Mallbu Entertainment
MBNA
MCI
Merrill Lynch
Mlda Group, The
Mills Corporation, The
Neiman Marcus
Nextel Communications
North Star Mall
Northpark Mall! Nasher Corp
Pacific Design Center
Piedmont Associates
Piano Independent School Dlstnct
Prentiss Properties
Progressive
Ritz Carlton
Rosewood Properties
Rouse Company
Southland Corporation
Southwestern Bell
Tech Data Corporation
T ele Tech T eleservlces
Texas Instruments
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital
Trammell Crow Company
TXU
University Community Hospital
Un Iverslty of Tampa
USAA
USF&G
Vantage Compames
Warner Center Properties
Zale Llpshy Hospital
I
I
I
I
.
I
CHANNELSIDE AT GARRISON SEAPORT
TAMPA, FLORIDA
I
OWNER THE HOGAN GROUP
ARCHITECT COOPER CARRY & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~~~,-
I
I
I
I Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
This project features forty shops, at least SIX restaurants, an
entertainment center, a movie theater with ten stadlum-
seating theaters, and an IMAX theater It IS a 230,000 SF
mixed-use retail complex located just east of downtown
Tampa along the Garnson Channel
Beck not only had construction Issues to address, It also had
to coordinate and schedule activities and dellvenes around
crUise ships' docking times CrUise shIps were docked next
to the site two days a week Dunng this time, no construction
or dellvenes could take place along the dock In addition, the
reVISions to Channelslde Dnve and the installation of the
new trolley car tracks along the north Side of the project
required Beck to closely coordinate and mOnitor the work In
these areas
Cost
$19,206,410
230,000 SF
Square Footage
Completion Date
August 2000
Reference
John Twomey, III
Formerly with The Hogan Group
8133803343
I
I,
I
I
.
VICTORY LOFTS AT CHANNELSIDE
TAMPA, FLORIDA
OWNER THE GIUNTA GROUP, LTD
ARCHITECT BECK
I
I
I
I
------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
Beck will provide a full range of services for 85 lofts and over 6,000
square feet of commercial space to be known as ViCtOry Lofts at
Channelslde Pnces of the lofts will range from $150,000 to $850,000
for lofts between 800 and 3,500 square feet
Available amenities Include open flexible floor plans with ceilings up to
20 feet high, dramatic wall-to-wall views of downtown Tampa, the Port
of Tampa, the Flonda Aquanum and Channelslde, luxury finishes In the
baths and kitchens, and sealed concrete or wood floors
The project calls for two bUildings The first, the Model-T bUilding, will
be a complete renovation of the old County Records bUilding The
structure was onglnally bUilt In 1925 to store automobiles that were
shipped through the Port of Tampa The Model-Twill feature 6,150
square feet of commercial space on the ground floor and 24 loft
residences
The second bUilding, named the ViCtOry BUilding, will be bUilt on vacant
land at 101 South 12th Street It will feature 100,000 square feet of
living space and 120 parking spaces on the two floors The third floor
will contain 23 loft flats with four that can be used as "live and work"
space There will be 23 lofts with mezzanines on the third floor and
eleven lofts with mezzanines on the fourth floor The rODf Will feature a
garden and community room
Cost
$27,000,000
250,000 SF
July 2004
Square Footage
Completion Date
Reference
John Baumann
The Giunta Group, Ltd
813 288 8826
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Resume
C SAMUEL ELLISON
Managmg Director
EDUCATION
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
RESPONSIBILITIES
EXPERIENCE
Better Buildings, Better Built!
II
As Managing Director, Sam IS a pnnclpal In the firm
and provides overall gUidance and support for the
entire project team Sam JOined the Beck organization
In 1974 as field engineer and has steadily progressed
to hiS current position He has a broad knowledge of
local conditions, pracbces and procedures HIS
relabonshlp with subcontractors and matenal
suppliers extends throughout the state of Flonda
BA In BUSiness - 1972
West Georgia College
Carrollton, Georgia
Bachelor of SCience - 1974
CIVil Engmeenng
Southern Technical Institute
Manetta, Georgia
29
Sam Will oversee the project and prOVide Input to such
Items as
. Pre-construction planning
. Scheduling
. Estimating
. Quality Process
. InterfaCing with the Architect and Its consultants
. Project Close-out
. Owner Move-In
ViCtOry Lofts - Tampa, FL
Channelslde at Garnson Seaport - Tampa, FL
University of Tampa Dormitory IV - Tampa, FL
Ritz Carlton Hotel and Condominiums - Cocoanut
Grove, FL
Tampa Museum of Art- Tampa, FL
Hope Lodge - Tampa, FL
University ofTampa Vaughn Center - Tampa, FL
UnIVersity of Tampa Brevard Hall - Tampa, FL
Neiman Marcus - Coral Gables, FL
Burdmes at CitrUS Park Mall- Tampa, FL
Brauho Alonso High School- Tampa, FL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Resume
NICK PAVONETTI
Director - Capital Solutions
EDUCATION
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
RESPONSIBILITIES
EXPERIENCE.
Better Buildings, Better Built!
Nick JOined Beck In 2000 bnnglng with him 30 years of
experience In banking and real estate and has a
complete understanding of both residential and
commercial development With contacts throughout
the real estate finance world, NICk has the ability to
create the optimal debt/eqUity combination for the
project Nick has the experience to take the project
from Initial concept through the feasibility, deSign,
due diligence, marketing and construction phases to
the ultimate successful conclusion
Master of BUSiness Administration - Finance
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL
Bachelor of BUSiness Administration - Finance
Marquette University
Milwaukee, WI
31
Oversee the development process, arrange debt and
eqUity finanCing, market research, rezoning and
entitlements, financial modeling, due diligence, and
marketing
ViCtOry Lofts - Tampa, FL
CNA Tower - Chicago, IL
Greenway Plaza - Houston, TX
Marathon 011 Tower - Houston, TX
Adams & Porter BUilding - Houston, TX
CE Lummls BUilding - Houston, TX
Raytheon BUilding - Houston, TX
EqUlfax BUilding - 8t Petersburg,
II
~ttt',~f;(,~;~~,\~i~i~~~!~~!~~~[~!f~~j~!~~~~i(~;!~~~~*;~*W~?1~)fz~~~?t~;t~~\~~l~;!~g!l@t~1~;W~~!~~1~
~ ~
.,:.:-(- -h'~.
~ ~
.,.(e _/',_
~10 c~i'
...::\~!~ ~~?~
~(~ 1~
-~- ~y
W ~
~ ~
ill~ R~
~"~- ~;;,.
gz~ ~~R
.>_:~ -)-,,-
m ~
.~(. ;;';;e
~ ~
m m
~~ ~~
~ ~
~.~ ~~
~ i@
W ~
;;.>{~ ~~~
~~ ~
e).t;;
~~
g;'l)
_/,0;0;
m!2
-;,,:,.;-
;'\"1'
;;;~~
g])1
~m~
~:,,::<.
Ell)
-1,7;
ill])
!c"~
~m~
-jX.
QJ~
?:..-~~
j!~
7tfl~
~~f~
ill"~
.....:.".
;r:~~
-":Y.
;;~?;-
~.~
::m;
ftz~
~(U~
~;~
I
I
I
License
I
State of Florida
Department of State
Limited Partnership #A26817
I
I
tt of --$ro '
~ta _ 4:-._ ~--"~I t!tba
I
I
I
',partmmt of 6tat,
I
I certify from the records of this office that HCBECK, L TO, a Texas Limited
Partnership, IS authorized to do business In the State of Flonda on
July 28,1988
I
The document number of this Limited Partnership IS A26817
I
I further certify that said Limited Partnership has paid all filing fees due this office
through December 31, 2003, and ItS status IS acbve
I
I
I
I
GIVen under my hand and the
Great Seal of the State of Flonda
at Tallahassee, the Capitol, thiS the
Seventh day of January, 2003
I
I
~~
~n ~~tztrer
J;\ecretarv of~tate
CA2E022 (1-03)
I
I
Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
II
I
I
I
License
II
I
I
State of Florida
Department of Business and ProfeSSional Regulation
Construction Industry Licensing Board
License Number' CGC038570
I
I
AC# 0572542 STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD SEQ#L02090S00701
I
I Oq /0: ~?OO?II:~:::/~I:l:-~~" ~:~::::7~R
I
The GENERAL CONTRACTOR
Named below IS CERTIFIED
Under the prov~s~ons of Chapter 489 FS
Exp~rat~on date AUG 31, 2004 -
I
ELLISON, CHARLES S
HCBECK LTD
5100 W KENNEDY BLVD STE 250
TAMPA FL 33609
I
JEB BUSH
GOVERNOR
DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW
KIM BINKLEY-SEYER
SECRETARY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Beffer Buildings, Better Built!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J2f, v 1Jj &114 '
.
June 13, 2003
Mr George McKibben
Purchasing Manager
City of Clearwater
MUnicipal Services BUilding
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
5100 West Kennedy Boulevard
Su Ite 250
Tampa Florida 336091817
813 282 3900
Fax 813 288 0188
beckgroup com
Re. RFP 29-03
eRA Station Square
Dear Dave
Thank you for the opportUnity to propose a development plan for the Station Square site We are excited
about the pOSSibility of being Involved In such a high profile project WhiCh, we believe Will have a significant
Impact on Downtown Clearwater We have structured a winning team compnsed of Beck, Urban StudiOS
and a group of local Clearwater Investors Additionally, ColOnial Bank has agreed to be the development
lender on the project
We would like to emphaSize that the team, which Will be led by Nick Pavonettl, Director of Capital Solutions,
has many years of expenence In successfully completing residential projects We have a proven track
record utiliZing the systems and processes, we have planned for the Station Square project
Our goal IS to deliver the hOUSing and retail space Clearwater needs to augment the revitalization of ItS
downtown area Our team has the deSign, construction and finanCial resources to develop an economically
feaSible project which Will meet the City's needs
Given the opportUnity, the Beck Team Will successfully develop the Station Square Park Site Into a mixed
use project which Clearwater can be truly proud Squanng off the site through purchase of the bUilding
owned by Mr Ray Cassano, <;IlIows us to create a project which IS pedestnan fnendly offenng a Sidewalk
.... - ,-- ---- ~ -- ----
cafe and other service onented r~rs
We are committed to exceeding our customer's expectations - It shows In everything that we do Please call
me With questions, If we can proVide addltlonalrnformatlon, or be of additional service In any way We look
forward to working With you
Sincerely,
C Samuel Ellison
Managing Director
HCBeck
Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
I
1-
1
Response to Request for Proposals
City of Clearwater for Station Square Park
1
A. Proposer Information
A1
Proposer Identification
I
Legal name and pnnclpal office address
1
The Beck Group
5100 West Kennedy Blvd
SUite 250
Tampa, Flonda 33609
1
Telephone number and facsimile number
1
Office 813/282-3900 FAX 813/288-0188
1
Name of authOrized agent who IS authonzed to contractually bind the Proposer, and
C Samuel Ellison
1
Name of the pnnclpal contact person If different than the authOrized agent
1
Nick PavoneUI emall n1ckpavonetb@beckgroup com, direct 813-387-5339
A.2
Status of the Proposer's Organization
1
The state of incorporation, If a corporation or state of registration, If a partnership
I
I
Beck IS a pnvately held limited partnership With Beck HCB Management GP,
Inc, a Texas corporation, as ItS managing general partner
Identify the Proposer's pnnclpal owners, If a corporation, general partners, If a partnership
and/or co-venturers Involved In the proposal including
1
1
Beck HCB Management GP, Inc, a Texas corporation, IS the managing
general partner
Legal names and addresses,
I
The Beck Group
5100 West Kennedy Blvd
SUite 250
Tampa, FL 33609
1
I
Belter Buildings, Better Built!
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Relationship and share of each participant's Interest In the Proposer's entity and proposal, and
While Beck IS the Proposer, It IS proposing on behalf of the Cassano Group of
Clearwater who will provide the financial resourges J9T th~e J2J.oje.c.t The
-Cassano Group will own l@~L~!1a:13~j;~ wlJI provide development
management and construction seNlces for a_ te~ Architectural seNlc_es_ will be
provided by Urban Studios ofTampa ~ - -- ------------
If the Proposer IS a subsidiary of a parent corporation or partnership, provide the legal name,
pnnclpal office address, and state of incorporation or registration of the parent firm
I
Not applicable
B. Project Team
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.1
PrOject Team Background Profiles
Provide background profiles of the Proposer and each firm on the team including history of the
firm, staff composition and availability, scope of services proVided and technical capabilities
B.2
See Beck's background profile under Tab 3 and Urban StudiO'S background
profile under Tab 4
Project Team Location
Identify the location of the Proposer or pnme firm's field office and locations of all participating
fl rm 0 fflce s
The team Will be headquartered at Beck's Tampa office
B.3
PrOject Team Organization and Project Management
Define overall team organization and project management of the Proposer and firm (s)
retained to do the planning, deSign, finanCing, construction, Implementation and operation of
the project Identify and diSCUSS responsibilities of the Proposer or firm that Will serve In the
lead or "pnme" role
Beck Will take the pnme and function as development manager The deSigner,
Urban StudiOS Will report to the development manager EqUity and debt
fInanCing WIll be proVIded bv the Cassano Group, whlch~ made up of local
Clearwater Investors Beck Will also proVide construction seNlces for the
project Beck Will be responsible for overall Implementation and operation of
the project and Will also manage the advertiSing and marketing firms and all
consultants reqUired for a successful development
Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
8.4 Proposer and Firm Roles, Responsibilities and Services
Descnbe the individual role, responsibilities and scope of services of the Proposer and each
participating firm
The proposer, Beck Will be the development manager and Will be responsible
for all aspects of the project Including due diligence, project concept, planmng
and design, construction, marketing, advertiSing, etc Beck Will perform the
construction In-house and Will contract with Urban Studios to provide deSign
services AdvertiSing, marketing, etc Will be sub-contracted to local Tampa
Bay firms
I
I
I
I
I
8.5 Proposer References
Provide a minimum of (3) three references for projects similar In scope and intensity as the
proposed project PrOVide a current name, address and telephone number for each reference
that was directly Involved and can be contacted by the City
Beck References
Project Gamson Seaport at Channelslde
John Twomey, III
The Hogan Group
8132748000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project VictOry Lofts
John Baumann
RSG 1013, LLC
8132888826
Project The Tampa Museum of Art
David Vaughn
City of Tampa
8132748568
Emily Kass, Director
Tampa Museum of Art
8132748130
Project Hlllsborough County School Projects
J Thomas Blackwell, Director
School Dlstnct of Hillsborough County
813 272 4112
Better Buildings, Better Builtl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
C. Experience
C.1 Qualifications of Key Team Members
Provide detailed resumes of the Proposer and pnnclpal team members, which Include the
following
See Beck resumes under Tab 3 and Urban Studios resumes under Tab 4
C.2 Prior Project DeSign and Construction Experience
Identify projects completed by the Proposer and development team, which are similar In scope
and Intensity to the proposed project For each, prOVide the following
The projects Included by the Beck Team Members were completed by the
office that IS applYing for thiS project The projects are Channelslde at
Gamson Seaport and VictOry Lofts The projects Included by Urban Studios
will be found In Tab 4
D. Financial References
Colonial Bank has agreed to proVide development and constructron finanCing for
the project, subject, of course, to normal underwntrng gUidelines See Tab 5 for a
letter of Interest from the bank
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E. Conceptual Development Plan
In addition to purchaSing the 36,000 sf of land contemplated herein, we plan to
square off the site by incorporating the 13,000 sf bUilding owned by Ray Cassano
Mr Cassano has agreed, subject to approval of thiS proposal, to contnbute hiS
bUilding to the project CJld lead a group of local Investors to capItalize the project
The Cassano building will be demolished to make way for the plann~d
developmenL
-
See Tab 6 for a conceptual site plan In general we propose to develop a mixed
use project including condominiums, retail and parking
Condominiums We plan to offer downtown hOUSing that IS affordable by the
majonty of workers below executrve rank Thus, we propose a 100 Unit bUilding
with the average selling pnce to average $210 per square foot (less than
$250,(00) per Unit Current plans call for two Unit plans seventy 1 bedroom/den
Units Sized at approximately 1,000 sq ft and thirty 2 bedroom Units at 1,300 sq ft
We understand that on a site of approximately 1 acre current zOning entities us to
bUild 70 Units We hope, however, to qualify for 30 addItional Units by vIrtue of the
,-- ~
Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
II
100 public parking spaces we are providing Additionally. we are willing to discuss
providing a piece of public art to help qualify for the 30 additional Units
ParklnQ The project will contain a 261 car garage which provides 1 6 ~
Unit plus 100 spaces to b the CI of ClearwaterWel:inderstand
a current code does not require parking for retail However, e current parking
count allows us to dedicate 1/1000 parking spaces per Unit to the retail If the City
so required Also, the attached site plan shows the only entrance Into the garage
off Laura Street We are Willing to discuss a garage entrance off Cleveland Street,
'as well, If me selection committee so desires
Retail By adding the 52 front feet acqUired In the Cassano tract we are able to
Incorporate approximately 9,900 sf of pedestnan fnendly retail Into the project We
enVISion a Sidewalk cafe that Will spill out Into Station Square Park plus additional
consumer onented retail
Office Since office demand IS particularly weak at the moment, we are not
planning any office space However, should an exceptionally creditworthy office
tenant Willing to sign a 10 year minimum lease appear we would be Willing to
reconsider thiS pOSition We look forward to working With the City Economic
Development Department to locate such a tenant
'(y1 Architecture It IS Imperative that any new architectural project take Into
conSideration the character and scale of the Immediate enVIronment It Will become
part of The City of Clearwater has carefully prepared "Character DiStriCtS and
Street ClaSSifications", January 27, 2003, that comprehensively charactenzes the
visual Image and perceived scale new development efforts In the City should focus
on and respect In detail Toward that end, the beginnings of Station Square's
scale and architectural vocabulary can be found In the adjacent Post Office to the
east The Post Office fa~ade IS created With Indigenous coqUina stone, graceful
arched recesses that shade pedestnans upon entry and a beautiful tile roof
Although the bUilding IS large It has a personal presence on Cleveland Street that
does not Ignore the passer by
Station Square IS proposed as a ten story, mixed use structure located on a tract
of land bounded by Laura Street to the north, an eXisting office bUilding complex to
the west, Cleveland Street to the south and the hlstonc Post Office to the east
From the Cleveland Street Side, two levels of parking Will be located above the
ground floor retail space before the bUilding essentially steps back and continues
upward With seven residential floors The nature of project plinth, created by the
retail space and parking levels IS very Similar to the character of the previously
mentioned Post Office elevation The occupied retail space on the ground floor
Will be set back from the bUilding face leaving a row of columns and creating a
shaded loggia Eve effort Will be made to clad the most perceivable surfaces
With an Indl enous m nal ar 0 co ulna stone e recesses that are
Better Buildings, Better Built!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
created at the ground floor will distinguish the modulation of the openings above In
the parking garage levels The opportUnity for decorative gnlles and tile work will
continue to break down the scale of the plinth for the Interest of the pedestrians at
grade An additional layer of canopies will add energy and color to the retail
environment of Cleveland Street
III
The residential tower will be designed to maXimize the obtainable views and
reinforce the notion of urban liVing It will be set back from the edge of the parking
levels at Cleveland Street, but will take full advantage of Station Square Park
Most likely the structure will have a stucco skin that gives way to windows that
appear to be punched through the extenor and larger openings that are filled With
walls of glass The windows will be broken down with an emphasIs on the
honzontal as In the Jalousies found In the windows of the Flonda vernacular
Stucco detailing will focus on the scale and proportion established In the plinth,
uSing color and shadow to animate and pronounce Mediterranean charactenstlcs
Balcony railings will put a delicate edge on the residential floors and once again
bnng the bUilding back to a human scale
F. Development Schedule
We plan to begin construction Within one year The exact time Will be determined
by the pace of condominium presales Construction Will take an additional year,
therefore, the first residents Will move In 12 -14 months from the construction
~
We understand that the City plans a major Cleveland Street streetscape program
In the Station Square area We request that construction of thp. ~trE'etsCaJ3lng be
timed to COinCide With the projected opening on our projel;t
G. Fmanclal Plan
Our analYSIS shows that the current and future luxury hOUSing market Will be well
served by eXisting and planned condominium projects on Clearwater Beach and
ultimately the Bluff Central City hOUSing IS, as yet, an unproven commodity In
Clearwater Therefore, we feel It IS prudent to offer a hOUSing product which IS
affordable by the Widest pOSSible range of potential buyers, Ie, the sub-luxury
market In order, to accomplish thiS goal we have deSigned a bUilding which IS
economical to construct And, we plan to offer finishes In keeping With projected
selling pnces Our research shows that thiS strategy has worked well In other
downtown markets across the US
In addition, to successfully market condos below $250,000 per Unit and pay the
City'S asking pnce of $720,000 for land we need to seek a vanance that Will allow
us to construct at least 100 condominium Units on slightly less than one acre Also,
Better BuildingsJ' Better Built!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the project becomes more feasible If we can have a simultaneous closmg where
the City would exchange the land for an equivalent value m parking spaces
The project owner, The Cassano Group, will bnng the necessary equity to the
table to develop the project IDe ownership group plans to retam ownership of the
retail and lease It accordmg to the plan above
H. Management Plan
Management of the condo Units will be done by a major condominium
management company and under the control of the home owners' association
The retail will be managed by the project owner
'<;.
Incentives
We understand that the City might consider negotlatmg a development agreement
with the successful proposer that waives Impact and permit fees And that the City
and ~he CountyJNnlllrt r.nn~lder Jomtly provldmg assistance for the prolect throuQh
a site specific TIF Our expenence shows that successful urban residential
requires financial support from the mUnicipal government Many mUnicipalities
have found site specific TIF's to be the most effective mechanism to stimulate
urban housmg We need look no further than the City Place development In West
Palm Beach for a successful example Additionally, the creation of 190+ site
specific TIF's by the City of Chicago was pnnclpally responsible for the creation
more than 19,000 downtown housmg Units We understand that such mcentlves
will require formal approval by the City and m some cases the County, as well
I
I
Better Buildings, Better Built!
II
'"'
, ,
,I ~~i
tl I ~-"
\
I [~--- '
'u \
(~-:",
I
,
I
· r
I
I '
..,
City of Clearwater,
REQUEST FOR DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSAL AND QUALIFICATIONS
I
I
.%
I'
'I
I
FOR
ommunity Redevelopment 'g
CRA) Infill Parcel Adjacent To St
Sqpare Park OR, Cle'f,land Stretp
Down7t8~n CI~irwater
~~
,
,
I
I
-
~ Clearwater
u
FEE SCHEDULE
Community Development Code
Effective Date October 20, 2000
I. ApplicatIons for Level One Development Approval
(a) Standard Development No fee
(b) Flexible Standard Development - Multi-famIly and
commerCial 475 00
(c) Flexible Standard Development - Smgle-famIly and two-famIly 10000
(d) Flexible Standard Development - Accessory uses/structures
for smgle-farruly and two-farruly properties 5000
(e) Contmuances of a Development Review Comrruttee (DRC)
meetmg 75 00
(t) Sidewalk cafe apphcatIon (as accessory to an eXlstmg use) 5000
r-(1)"')Sldewalk cafe perrrut (due on or before October 1 of each year r1~
~ and shall cover the time penod of Oct 1 through Sept 30 of the ~
followmg calendar year Permits Issued after Oct 1 and before
Sept 30 shall have fees prorated on a monthly basIs Any portIOn
of the month shall be conSidered a full month for calculation
purposes)
II.
ApplicatIons for Level Two Development Approval
(a) Flexible Development - Smgle-farruly and two-famIly
<;:(6J'Flexlble Development - MultI-farruly and commerCial
'1~ Prehmmary Plat
(d) Transfer of Development Rights (no additional charge If
Subrrutted with Flexible Development apphcatIOn)
(e) Appeals to the Commumty Development Board - Residential
(t) Appeals to the Commumty Development Board -
Non-reSidential
(g) Appeals to a Hearmg Officer
(g) Contmuances of CDB meetmg/pubhc hearmg
200 00
c::r:wsoD.:)
600lJO
1,205 00
10000
250 00
500 00
7500
No fee
885 00
775 00
7500
doU5O~
300 00
500 00
150 00
2500
5000
r3OQOO)
~
S /planmng/applzcatlOn form~/development reVlew!commumty development code fee schedule doc - edited May 5, 2003
III
ApplicatIons for Level Three Development Approval
(a) AnnexatIOn (mcludes land use map amendment and rezomng to
categones compatible With County deSignations)
(b) Land use map amendment
(c) Zomng amendment (only)
(d) Contmuances of a DRC, CDB or City ComrrussIOn meetmg/
~Pubhc heanng
~Development Agreement (mcludes DRI and NOPC)
(t) Fmal Plat
(g) Vested Rights
IV
Other
(a) AdmmlstratIve lot diVISion (mmor lot adjustment)
(b) Zomng venficatIon letter
(c~ Zonmg mterpretatIOn letter
@Comprehenslve Sign Program
(e) Mmor amendment to a ComprehenSive Sign Program
~ 277A
,
... 2778
"-
:;: 1
2
~
, 1;4 n 6 : Il
J: ~~;
'" ",;--- ~ 0IlEw -
I~ ,: -='::::': '2/06 ~
~~f::ig: 0 Il- '490-5$7 12/07'u I
1522-38 . 12/0S 9205 62' 'II! 12/05 12/01 ~~
1&42_2'1" 1
L.S te' I MAIN LIBRAPY IV 12/04l
"',_ COACHMAN PARK I 100
k /~FORO & SMOYEt< 4-1Ul 0 ;:i-
,I ,;,-- - ~ 1396-575 ffi I "'19-1.513 88
g ., t-l-SUNS'Cr cdrjrn ~;-:3. 10 @ ~
I- 8 qtJ.f.76 ~ 2253-111 ~ i
L_____
5
8 lQ03-49g
9~15
'B57-10J6
9ZJ-.t87
.~ 3
! ~
3 41 f5
~ i I:DO:.o %06
;00 ~101'
55~A
j"j
~
eo
21 011
r-- StREET
55 1 35 8 7 $0
~ 9 e ~
ii '" ~
"' i :" 4 ~ '0 5 '" ~ ~ 11/0' NALL
~ ~ ~ ~~ 2" =! I, MORTONS9Ji,.
'2/03 ~ d~~4 -;... ,J I 21 6 n
'00 ~ ',>~ 0 @
~IT ~l ~'2 0: :; ~ ~ ; ~~~ .J.. ~~ >.,,>.,~~: STRtL~~Tll1
21 20 19 '~ 7 '5'" ~ ~ ...._~~ ,,~I>o of> , 14 '~ '8 17 16
~ ;1 i 14ft ~3 ~L_ ~ if IN ! 2.. ...
: lAURA ~lRU:T: it::,;. !i2 Cl) .
5e:) IS ~ z: Jit:.J,. I.AVRA~
7. 6 \.. '. 1.:.1.. It::'\ ~ r::-. 2 ~ <:>
~ ''If- A E ~ F- :z: ~ '" ,..; . _ 8 5 ·
j 7.44 '4' 9 10 11 :t: ~ ~ >.;;..r jE;jCj ~~JON",7.. :.. fie, :5 'l 1
18 0 .-- -< A 3 6 Cj SCUARE ~ :=.j:::....
7..... ~3 N ~I~ to Z 7 ~ '5:07 ~!It p~./..--..:!:::::...
Hl~( p~ ~I~ 5; 1" ~ fa '" 4 5 Z i 1 e. 11 .03 9 10 " 2 13 14
g ta !~ ........ ~e ~= ~ ~ 2t Ileg .. , Q~ ~n!~ Q , 0
...... ......~......... "~35 IOIOIQ IQlOQ :!SS :U~ -.. .. :::
~ Cll:\lELAND iI (S R 60) ~... '"
, ~1~~t511!:; ; r;~: i ~~ 4i 3
DAVEY ,,=:> ~ ;~~~~'~. j~~
B ~ i:~ ~ 6 7 . ~ 2 B 9
~ r:::... 9 22 ~~. ~~! ~= !\!= ' t"N !
-< 'V to ~ ~ PARI<
~
19
= - ,r,~-:."502 "
... .. --- ~
98714321'
It
f
\ w,_"
926 15'7
.
3
Rts. Q1-3Q
1522-38 4
92&-15
2
. "'
mo ~
q
I-IARBORVlEW CENTER
ROMPON S & BASKINS 7998-608
l' r
-/ ~ 0 57-1
, iI
D 10B1-~g
'A
~ Vf4~
BAYFRONTiTENNI<;
COMPLEX ~
121M ff
," .I
L.&"18 I
J
I ~ r-'
I ~
I 2 ill
I J R
L@___-.!'
3
1 if ~'2 13 14::
!O 11 ~~! ~
1 =
:J;:~ = !i: :
76543
0'1
c:
:s2
'0
I
I
~ ---l_=.
~ o:~,\
<Ill PIERCE ~~
100 I ~ '.,
19':'~ 24/0' ,,~
~
1 ;"'~:: 9
i ~ ~'ri~2;
~t11
C~3
4 6 '1: 8
10 ~.; '\. 5291 2'5
PIERCE "",. 81~
12
13 Z 18 110
f---
17
~
16
!~3
I
1\1 Iii" \;1 ~
, 2 ~/7J.\. 5',JJ' 7
St \ t 315
14 )~,.-~ n
1.:e 13 1121 11 9 ~
~..... i !I
-'
-'
<(
J:
4
H1 - 67
'"
~ 2059-." S 5
~~:~_:~RCtI ~~: ~"i ~
\'" 'fwoo1 lE ~
13/01
~ \ OAK COVE CONDO tw
~ 1~-~ '
o :;os-
~ ~3/1l ~"~
is ~ 13/03 , 3/02
2 ~3ft .t04
',.).~.~~ 2 J" ~~ 1 2 T 1
~ _'f ! al~;: 65 0/ ;
~T 12 198rU,1 ~
~ ~~ I:''"~'
)... ~
3 4 > 4
OAK .. 3DEIi:P
:: i~3/'2
~ "'I''' '2MARKLEY
,fU ~ 2 g 1 ~ 13
.. roo.. "i>.- ..
YO!: ~~ ~J-.71 9-81 ~,
,.
15
,..
D
f O[to 17383 I
I ...._.... ZOZ
----r-----
f 1)((0 17371~ ;~~
-r-- ____---l
/ Q1. 2185
to
~
"
o
M
o
0\
o
N
o
f'a
i'i'
C!.
0\
o
~
'0
IXl
<0
~
Iii
IV
~
'0
13
B
:3
!!J-
c:
6>
c:
~
, W~H~Uf N
9
. ~
~..: --~
r~ 0 c(__
r::::r? ~[;:
1-'-- t!\~
() 8. ~ 1S
, .
"
:
5 . 7
ZIO ~
2
f---
~
~~~iC63
5
g ~17701 f1'ANKUN
..
~ :6 1
~ ~~8
37" ~8 ~ + ~
:1'36 ~ i 9 ~~.-
35 ~ ~ 10-
1'1'8 -< ~1'~ 16
I~T~ __ ~
- !:!
~ ~ r~
~ -b 11211~ ~
iii' '0
I
I
D:-=~t----l 2
,...:-- I -...-=- J. 2
----t--
SOl
~
~ I :~
~ CQU
! 44
...'
! =r.:!:
\! 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 8
s U fl~2~ 10 9:
SlREET
~
'"
~
I G'
:O~~y:: ST". i ~~ 16 8" 1
,I" 48 31 ~ 4
49 30..1'0 ~ 25
50 29 ~
5' 28 27
2
3
COURT
---~ ~
11/ D
j
/
= t . , I 0; ~.[T ~
. 5 . ~3 . .~llIl .
2 3 7 61 9
K- 7~
- - -J;;=
1~ .000
2 ~
'"
..
BLUFFS
CONDO
102-96
11
.
9 ~
.
I.- I I \l;!
18 17 1& 15 14 13 p21'1 10~
! ! Q~! 5 !! !: !
~TRE(T
Hl-97 3
:...-
I
1fT 21' ~
~ 170 (
413~2Tl~~H _ 8
n _li~\' ~~I
~I ~1;lliillarl
~
"9
, 0
.
765432130
7 B 9
6 2~ D ".0
~ ~ ~
:
5~
2 ,
ST~EEt
~ ~ -~ ~e
!. 3 ;"
, 2
- ~11
1""1>0'-02
7 B
'0 9
smt:ET
1]
'0 9
~"'EET
=~ *tf;;;)
, ~\.' 3 4
2
...
IS
D
'0 9 18 7
R i 1!
R
STIlEET
~
2 3
"..,
.,e 'C
10 9 6
~
I I 1I
2 ,
""~.
" ..
Jl) 67 25
~
II
CITY OF CLEARWATER
AND VICINITY
PIIlELIAS COIlNTY FLORIDA
PREPARED BY
PUBLIC !fORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERINC
100 Ci. "')rl\~ l.-..e, Cleorfrotrf f."l mss
Ph. (727)562-4750 rail (727)526-.4.755
'GT:
II
~1
--
II
.,,- -
II
, 2
=-
16 15
3 .
5 ~
z
:1
"1
6 \ 7
I
~
I~
r:-, 5:;1:\ ~
6il I~
I J..M.
: I
5 J
~I ==
7 ; "'l~~
lllffi
~
~
~
i
Mlp /Iwww tltorwa\er-fl com/Clly.-OepQflmenll/puDl1cworu/engtnH1 /
DllIOc mer
Public: lnformatlO(\ dolo Is furnlsr.ed by ln8 City of Cleorwot~r
PublIc Works AdmlnfstrotlOn/Eru;I...eer1nq. and must e.. accepted
and used by the reCIpient With the u(lderslond.,q that the dota
fece Yl!'d wos collected fOf' the purpo~ of develop....g 0 l1"Oi:ll" =
mf(O$lrudure t\vefltory As '!IJch the City of Cleofwater pw..../E
malees no worront~$ ....praned or Impl ed c:oncemlng t".
accurocy com~eteness retloblHty Of suitabilIty of thIs dolo (0(
orlll clner oart culor u't. F'urtl'oermore the C ty of C1ear....ater
PWA/E assumes no llOb111y whatsoever assocloted ..lIh the use
or misuse of svd"t dato
Ullli,
Tn s Atlas peI.;e s SlJb~t to periodIC chQl'Iges
for II'Iformotlon about lotest rev $Ions please coil PW.A.!E or
v~t OlJr Web SIte
'<
EB
.
<I
I)...
-.
-n
~o
.~
o
I
,
400
I
690
, 00 200
, I
SCALE' 400
LEGEND
@ BLOCK NUMBER
1234 LOT ADDRESS
CITY LIMITS LINE
,.--, SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
L__..1 OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS
. AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
. CITY OWNED PROPERTY
M D R ZONING DESIGNATION
- ZONE LINE
REZON,..C
III ,,~ 10/07/93
II! 5305 IO/07/Q3
I1l 596" Oa/15.1'96
'9
REVISED
8/20/2002
ZONING ATLAS
NE 1/4 OF SECTION ') ~ h ~
~f
Nick Pavonettl
Director of Capital Solutions
II
Tel 813 282 3900 Fax 813 288 0188
n1ckpavonettl@beckgroup com
Direct 813 387 5339
Cell 813 376 9522
5100 W Kennedy Blvd SUite 250
Tampa Florida 33609
beckgroup com
.... ",;__-,...l.'::.---,~-*........~~~~....:l.~~
Brian MurphV
Development Manager
II
Tel 813 282 3900 Fax 813 387 2901
brlanmurphY@beckgroup com
Direct 813 387 5336
Cell 813 918 2305
5100 West Kennedy Blvd SUite 250
Tampa Flonda 33609
beckgroup com
<'
Richard Zmgale, AlA
President
urban
studio architects
".-
655 N Franklin Street SUite 150 Tampa FL 33602-4447
Telephone 81 3 228 730 I Fax 8 I 3 229 1981
nchardz@urbanstudlo com License No AA COO 1902
""
~$ ~--r~ ~~~~"W~~..._, _.._..,..., ~~",,~~~o;-'..~""""';<: -
\
'-
COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Final Agenda Item #
Meeting Date
3
May 12, 2003
SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize Issuance of a Request for Proposals and Qualifications (RFP/Q) for the redevelopment of the
Station Square Parkmg Lot Site on Cleveland Street as an office/retail/residential mflll developmentl
[g\ and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same
SUMMARY:
The purpose of the RFP/Q IS to select a qualified developer/development team to redevelop the
Station Square Parking Lot site as a mixed-use Inflll development The CRA IS making the site
available for redevelopment as a catalyst for new urban housing and professional office use In the
Downtown core The site IS 35,968+/- square feet, currently used as a public parking surface lot, and
IS owned by the CRA -
The major components of the RFP/Q are as follows
. The mixed-use development should have four key land use components 1) on-site parking
structure including public parking, 2) 50,000 square feet of office space, 3) 5,000 square feet
of ground floor retail, and 4) condominiums
. The Developer will purchase the Site from the CRA The appraised value IS approximately
$720,000 ($20 square foot)
. As a catalyst for redevelopment, the CRA will consider purchasing parking spaces In the
development for public use
. The proposal deadline IS June 13,2003 With a selection made by June 27,2003
. The selection of the development candidate will be based on four criteria, each haVing equal
weight 1) Development qualifications, 2) Financial capability of the development team, 3)
Economic benefit to the City of Clearwater, and 4) Merits of the conceptual development plan
. The conceptual development program being proposed for the site will need to address height,
scale, square footage of specific land uses, proposed architectural style and material types,
site and bUilding Orientation and pedestrian scale at Cleveland Street, bUilding setback deSign
concept from Cleveland Street, and project relationship to adjOIning Station Square Park
. The selected developer will enter Into a Development Agreement With the CRA outlining the
purchase and diSposition of the Site, the deSign parameters agreed to by the CRA and the
City, any inCentives, and the terms and conditions related to public parking
ReViewed bY.1'11
Legal ~
Budget NA
Purchasing JjiiJ.
Risk Mgmt NA
Info Tech
NA
Originating Dept
Economic Development and
Housln
User Dept
EconomIc Development
Attachments
1) RFP/Q
Costs
-0-
Total
Public Works
DCM/ACM
Other
iJd-o
NA
Funding Source
Capltallmprovemenl
Current Fiscal Year
Operaling
Other
Appropriation Code
Submitted by I)'.. fA ~
Clt Mana er 'OUr ~ -
~ Prmted on recycled paper
2/98
o None
Rev
f
~
-'
I
.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CHECKLIST
YES NO
Statement of General Purpose V
a) Release date
b) Pre-proposal conference date and time V
c ProDosal due date and tIme of openinf! v
d Selection of top candidates if
e) Vendor demonstrations NJA
fl Site VISit dates /lJ1 A
2) Staff recommendation date -V
h) Cltv ComnusslOn action ..- CP- JS;: ttr.A-itlil v
I) Contract lDltIatIonlstart date AlJA-
I) Prolect completion . tJlA
Scope of Prolect V
Vendor OualIficatlOn V
InformatIon to be Submitted V
Instruction for PreparahonlNumber of Copies ReqUired ./
When and How to Direct InQumes if
How Addenda WIll be CommUDlcated .7
General Contract Terms PiA
Soeclal Contract Terms NIA
EvaluatIon Criteria v
Evaluation Team (Names and/or Departments) ThD
DondlO! and/or Insurance ReqUIrements J7
When Proposals Must be returned V
Standard Conditions (see attached) V
a. Aporopriahons Clause v
b. Protest Procedures t/
c. No CorrectIons Clause V
d. Ooenness of Procurement V
e. No CollUSIOn Clause V
f InformaIitvlRelectlOn Clause ,7
2. ProfessIOnal Services Included lD FlOrida Statutes TVI It
EvaluatIon Committee MeetInl! DatelTlme/Place NotIce to CItv Clerk nD
Attachments
Department DIrector 1'/&t1tlJJV
~S\ ,D1V~Y-- I
Risk Manager N J A
I
REQUIRED APPROVAL
PurchasIng Manager/~ Jl~
C~Manager ~tUf4 '~-L
City of Clearwater, Florida
REQUEST FOR DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
AND QUALIFICATIONS
FOR
A Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA)
Infill Parcel Adjacent To Station Square Park On
Cleveland Street in Downtown Clearwater
1
j
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AND QUALIFICATIONS
STATION SQUARE PARKING LOT INFILL
CLEARVVATER,FLORIDA
INTRODUCTION
Project Location, Ownership and Purpose
The Commumty Redevelopment Agency (CRA) ofthe CIty of Clearwater, Flonda mVItes.
quahfied apphcants to submIt proposals for a mIxed-use mfill development on the
35,968+/- square foot StatIOn Square Parkmg Lot (SIte) lymg on the north SIde of
Cleveland Street, and Just west of Myrtle Avenue, wIthm the downtown core of the CIty
The CRA seeks to reVIew only those proposals that address the development, dIsposItion
and sale of the entire SIte, and neIther the CRA nor the CIty mtends to undertake any
mfrastructure demohtIon or sIte work before dIsposItion other than removmg CIty owned
parkmg meters
The SIte IS currently owned by the CRA and IS bemg made avallable for redevelopment
as a catalyst for new urban housmg and profeSSIOnal office use
Downtown Redevelopment Opportunities
AddItional mformatIon regardmg thIS mfill parcel, and the current redevelopment chmate
wIthm the downtown core and on our beaches, may be obtamed by a reVIew ofthe
"Development OpportumtIes - BUIldmg Our Future Together" economIC development
brochure WhICh accompames thIS RFP request
Background Information
Downtown Clearwater offers an enVIronment free of sIgmficant cnme, detenorated
bUIldmgs or crumblmg mfrastructure, WIth a current strong consumer demand for market-
rate urban housmg umts due to ItS strategIc locatIOn to regIOnal employment nodes and
access to Clearwater beaches and boatmg venues These new housmg umts should act as
a catalyst for future support, retall and entertamment venues
As part of the CIty CommISSIOn's long-range VISIOn for the redevelopment and
stabIhzatIOn of the downtown core, major steps have been mItIated to encourage
redevelopment These mclude the 2002 expanSIOn of the CIty'S CRA dIstnct, the
preparatIOn of an update to the Downtown Plan mcludmg a major streetscape and
wayfindmg SIgn program for Cleveland Street, Fort Hamson and Osceola Avenues, the
recent deSIgn for a future major waterfront park and manna west of Osceola Avenue, the
construction of a new mam hbrary on Osceola, an analYSIS for alternative locations for
2
future downtown parkmg structures, and the completIOn of a $12 mIllIon dollar
downtown lake and recreatIonal park All of these documents and graphIcs wIll be
avaIlable for reVIew at the EconomIC Development and Housmg Department, CIty of
Clearwater, 112 S Osceola Ave, Clearwater, FL
Project Parameters
The CRA IS solIcltmg proposals from developers and mvestors mterested m undertakmg
a major mIxed-use development project that would entaIl four key land use components
· A parkmg structure that would provIde all reqUIred parkmg for the mtended land
uses, as well as pubbc parkmg spaces
· A mInImum of 50,000 square feet of office space (a cOIporate headquarters use IS
preferred)
· A mInImum of 5,000 square feet of ground floor retaIl use, mcludmg space for a SIt
down restaurant
· MultIple floors of resIdentIal condommlums
The SIte could be deSIgned and developed under the followmg broad gUIdebnes
A resIdentIal densIty of 70 dwellmg UnIts per acre, a base FAR of 4 0, WIth the potentIal
for mcreasmg the FAR for partlclpatmg m the adjacent streetscape and wayfindmg
program, by provldmg an on-sIte outSIde dmmg area adjacent to StatIon Square Park, and
by provldmg a negotIated number of publIc parkmg spaces
The heIght of the buIldmg IS not bemg prescnbed, however, m the mterest of mamtammg
a "pedestrIan" scale, the buIldmg fayade facmg Cleveland Street cannot exceed 3 stones
or 40 feet, and must then "step" back m a manner acceptable to the CommunIty
Redevelopment Agency, the CIty, and the CommunIty Development Board (note please
contact the Planmng Department for clanficatIOn on how FAR and reSIdentIal denSIty are
calculated for mIxed-use projects)
Site Purchase Price
The CRA commISSIOned two recent appraIsals and has estabbshed a purchase value for
the SIte at $20 00 per square foot or $720,000 00
eRA Participation in the Proposed Parking Structure
In an effort to proVIde a catalyst for the successful redevelopment of thIS downtown mfill
SIte, the CRA WIll conSIder re-purchase of pubbc parkmg spaces from the successful
Proposer
3
~
A Development Agreement between the partIes shall govern the terms and condItIons
assocIated wIth thIS project
PROPOSAL AND SELECTION PROCESS
Overview
Proposals submItted WIll prOVIde Proposers the opportunIty to demonstrate theIr ablhty to
undertake the planmng, desIgn, financmg, constructIOn, and ImplementatIOn of the
project envISIOned
Schedule
Release RFP/Q
Pre-proposal Conference
Proposal SubmIttal DeadlIne
SelectIon COlmmttee RecommendatIon
CRA AuthonzatIon to NegotIate
May 14, 2003
May 21,2003
June 13, 2003 ~
)une 27, 2003
July 14, 2003
Proposal Submittal
Proposals must be submItted on or before June 13, 2003 by 4 00 P m Eastern Standard
TIme Late Proposals will not be accepted. Proposals shall be submItted m a sealed
envelope or box and clearly marked as follows
Request For Proposal- eRA Station Square
Number of Copies
One (1) fully SIgned ongmal transmIttal letter and 10 copIes ofthe proposal shall be
submItted to the CRA The SIgner of the transmIttal letter must be the person WIth
authonty to act on behalf ofthe Proposer
Proposal Delivery Location
Proposals shall be maIled or hand dehvered to the office of
Mr George McKIbben
Purchasmg Manager
CIty of Clearwater
MUnICIpal ServIces BUIldmg
100 S Myrtle Avenue
POBox 4738
Clearwater, Flonda 33756-5520
4
J
Pre-Proposal Conference
The CIty WIll hold a pre-proposal conference on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 at 11 00 a m
at CIty Hall, 3rd Floor Large Conference Room, 112 S Osceola Avenue, Clearwater,
Flonda
Answer and Question Period
All questIOns regardIng tlns RFP must be subrmtted In wntmg and dIrected to the
PurchaSIng Manager no later than 5 days pnor to the submIttal deadlIne Answers to
questions wIll be provIded to all those that have receIved the Request for
Proposal/QualIfications Questions may be 1) sent VIa emaIl to Mr George McKibben at
gmclabbe@clearwater-fl com, 2) faxed to (727) 562-4635, or 3) mailed or hand-
delIvered to
Mr George McKibben
PurchaSIng Manager
CIty of Clearwater
MunIcIpal ServIces BUIldIng
100 S Myrtle Avenue
POBox 4738
Clearwater, Flonda 33756-5520
Communication of Addenda
In the case that there are Addenda to tlus RFP, the addenda wIll be forwarded In wntmg
to those who have receIved a copy oftlus RFP my maIl For those who downloaded the
Information from our web sIte (www c1earwater-fl com), please contact the PurchaSIng
Manager for mformatIOn (see above)
Qualifications
As part of the proposal submIttal, each Proposer must provIde
· A narratIve descnbmg the Proposer's plan of development for thIS mfill project
. A "conceptual" SIte plan for the SIte notmg bulk, heIght, number ofuruts, and square
footage of office and retaIl
· A breakdown of the proposed parkIng spaces to be allocated to the office use, the
cOndOmInIUmS, and avaIlable for publIc use
· A bnef descnptIOn of the VarIOUS land uses beIng proposed, and an Idea on the pnce
pOInts and square footage of the condomlmum unItS bemg proposed
. CreatIve and mnovatIve deSIgn solutIOns
. A financlallustory
. Pnor development expenence
. A statement of the relatIOnshIp between the developer and any parent company or
SUbSIdIarIeS that mIght also take part m the development
5
rj
. A proposed development schedule notIng start date and antICIpated date of
occupancy
Expenses
All Proposers respondIng to thIs RFP do so at theIr sole expense and nsk The CRA and
CIty assume no finanCial or other oblIgatIOn to Proposers who respond to thIS RFP The
eRA and CIty WIll not be lIable to any broker, consultant or other entIty actIng on behalf
of any Proposer for any fee or payment relatIng dIrectly or IndIrectly to the Proposer or
Its proposal
Proposal Compliance
The selected Proposer shall comply WIth all applIcable laws, ordInances and regulatIons
Non-confidentiality
All proposals, correspondence and records made thereof, are publIc record and handled
In complIance WIth applIcable state and local laws
Selection of Development Candidate
A selectIon cormmttee WIll make a recommendatIon of the development candIdate by
June 27, 2003 The evaluatIOn and selectIOn of the development candIdate wIll be based
on the follOWIng cntena
. EconomIC benefit to Clearwater 25%
. Development qualIficatIons 25%
. FmancIal capabIlIty ofthe entIty 25%
. Development proposal 25%
RFP SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Proposer Information
- Legal name and pnncIpal office address
- Telephone number and e-maIl address
- Name of authonzed agent who IS authonzed to negotIate WIth the CRA
B. Project Team
Names and qualIficatIons of all team members, legal counsel, archItect, finanCIal
InstItutIOn, contractor (Iflmown) A statement ofthe relatIOnshIp between the developer
and any parent company or SUbSIdIarIeS that mIght also take part In the development
6
~
c. Experience
Pnor development expenence and relevant proJect(s)
D. Financial References
ProvIde a financIal InstItutIOn reference contact, wInch may be contacted by the CRA
E. Conceptual Development Program
· Proposers need to document In text and sketch form the extent of theIr
redevelopment program beIng proposed for tIns SIte
· Plans may be "conceptual" In format, but should be detaIled enough to reflect the
scope of the proposed development project
· Elements wInch should be addressed Include heIght, scale, square footage of speCIfic
land uses, proposed archItectural style and matenal types, sIte and bUIldIng
onentatIOn and pedestnan scale at Cleveland Street, bUIldIng setback desIgn concept
from Cleveland Street, and project relatIonsInp to the adjOlmng StatIOn Square Park,
and access pOInts and curb cuts beIng conSIdered for the project
F. Development Schedule
Each Proposer shall submIt a proposed deSIgn, CIty reVIew and constructIOn calendar
schedule It IS the deSIre ofthe CRA that thIS redevelopment project IS under
constructIOn wltInn twelve months ofCRA approval of the Development Agreement
G. Financial Plan
Each Proposer shall submIt a prelImInary finanCIal plan, IncludIng a prelImInary
constructIon budget ThIS finanCIal package shall IdentIfy the total project cost, and
proposed source of fundIng
In addItIon, each Proposer shall demonstrate the proposer's financIal capaCIty to develop
the SIte
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
The CRA and CIty are not aware of any SOlI or groundwater contamInatIOn that may
adversely affect development The EconomIC Development Department under ItS
Brownfield's program WIll proVIde funds for a Phase I assessment, and a Phase II If
deemed necessary
DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS
7
"
\
.
I'
~
The selected Proposer shall enter mto a bmdmg Development Agreement WIth the CRA,
wInch shall outlme the purchase and dIsposItion of the subject SIte, the underlymg prOject
development deSIgn parameters agreed to by the CRA and CIty, any mcentIves agreed
upon, and the terms and condItions relatmg to any other terms and condItions for publIc
parkIng
The selected Proposer shall be requested to make a presentatIOn to the CRA pnor to theIr
formal selectIOn by the CRA as the desIgnated development team (time and location to be
announced)
DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES
Due to the Importance of tIns partIcular downtown mfill redevelopment SIte, It IS the
mtentIon of the CRA and the CIty to negotIate certam development "mcentIves" whIch
mIght mclude, but not be 111mted to, the waIvmg of certam Impact fees and the use of tax
mcrement financmg revenues The project would be also elIgIble for Enterpnse Zone
credIts
GENERAL CONDITIONS
The CRA, m ItS sole and absolute dIscretion, WIth or WIthout cause, and WIthout lIabIlIty
of any kInd to any Proposer, reserves the nght to
- Accept or reject any and/or all proposals, eIther m whole or m part, waIve any
mformalIty of any proposals, cancel thIS RFP at any time and/Ol take any actIOn m
the best mterest of the CRA or CIty The eRA's deCISIOn m all matters shall be
fmal,
- Retam all proposals for offiCial record purposes, mcludmg a copy of the selected
Proposer's proposal and supportmg documentatIOn, and/or use them m whatever
manner It deems appropnate,
- Elect not to accept any request by any Proposer to correct errors or omISSIons m any
mformatIOn, calculations or competitive pnce(s) submItted once a proposal IS
receIved,
Investigate the finanCIal capabIlIty, mtegnty, expenence and qualIty of performance
of each Proposer mcludmg all pnncIpals,
Request an oral presentatIOn from any Proposer, and,
- Request any addItional mformatIOn from any Proposer
8
/. /~./)1- W-
-
_1fJt!)tt - - ~
_~ :~ ?ftmm~ - ;n,~ - ?~ -lJIff
-tm(~~o<:;r~- Q7?~~~~~
n' ~
- '11' ~ -rn~ct~lXJ ~
~~-#~~~f7oP~~
~~_--fi~~~~-~>>;- 7~
;~ ?/IWlr~~.n:tJh.1
~i?J7l7?}
'"
?)l- ',r ~ ~ ~~~~~~
!~? tJt>>ld'tJO -/~~/:;4' 7fii, ~
-
{)#~l~ h ~ ~~/Jth-~~//~~-
;~(p {ld / Ib ~ p;;~ 8(,8 qz -J /f!!? ~
I
_1Zm-:~iJ/~~~~~
! --I' tJ.6~~. . .
p;;~ ~! ~ ~ p()~92~/b;?d
_~ ;,,1~d~ftiji/~~4~
I tJo~
-~/~,- ~Z~ - A;);J2,~~IZ!!?I-o~
(I ~~Jt> ~/ - .
HI ~~~~1ir/1JP~.
Best Copy
Availalil.
-
-
f/~~~
13m; , ~~::k/ ~~~~ r!-
I ~ 1/ 1')0-- k /d. ., atUt- t1'77 W77dJZ. - ~ .t7~
,
- MUtI!2?-WItJ~2-~t?~ .___
! /~ g/M/o LY/./H ~
f/lJ- \0 tfC, c/}1 ~. /q.a.
---
i
,
~211 ~-~~
- III
I, -
I
I
, I ~
,I
! I
, I
II'
I
I,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I e.c;t cop'l
B-olab\e
I ".. "a\
I
,
Page 1 of2
Tarapani, Cyndi
From Parry, Mark
Sent Monday, January 12,2004257 PM
To: Owens, Reginald, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina, Akin, Pam
Cc: Harnger, Sandy, Phillips, Sue
Subject: RE Staff report - Beck Project
That'll be Juts groovy
In my mind I didn't think that cars would be 100% screened but more like effectively screened 0 e not seeing
headlights and car gnlls)
Mark T Parry
Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
727 562 4558
mark parry@myclearwater com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Owens, Reginald W
Sent: Monday, January 12, 20042 49 PM
To: Parry, Mark; Tarapam, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina, Akin, Pam
Cc: Harnger, Sandy, Phillips, Sue
Subject: RE Staff report - Beck Project
Mark
We can address thiS tomorrow at the QRT meeting with Beck - will that work
I do know that from day one they have shown some smaller Units on their submittals
Also, the request for a metal decorattve gnll was more for aesthlcs, Instead of haVing cables I do not think
anyone thought that they would totally screen the cars - difficult to do an stili malntam the air flow
necessary for a structured parking area
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Parry, Mark
Sent: Monday, January 12, 20042'42 PM
To: Owens, Reginald, Tarapam, Cyndl, Fierce, LIsa; Clayton, Gina, Akin, Pam
Subject: FW Staff report - Beck Project
I got a comment back from Bnan Murphy With Beck He cannot agree to two ofthe condlttons
of the Staff report (one of which IS stipulated In the Agreement)
Please adVise - anyone
See below
Mark T Parry
Planner
1/12/2004
1/12/2004
Page 2 of2
City of Clearwater
Plannrng Department
727 562 4558
mark parry@myclearwater com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: bnanmurphy@beckgroup com (maJlto bnanmurphy@beckgroup com]
Sent: Monday, January 12,20049.56 AM
To: Parry, Mark
Subject: Re Staff report - Beck Project
I have reviewed the Staff Report and have the following comments
Conditions of Approval
6 We can not commit that all unrts will be no less than 1,000 SF Currently we have 36
unrts planned for less than 1,000 SF
13 The south and west sides of the bUilding will have decorative metal gnllwork to
conceal vehicles I can't say that thiS matenal will completely screen the vehicles from
view
Please contact me to diSCUSS these Items Thank you
Brian Murphy
Beck
5100 West Kennedy Boulevard SUite 250
Tampa, FL 33609
813-387-5336
Better BUlldmgs, Better BUilt I
"Parry, Mark" <Mark Parry@myClearwatercom>
To .'bnanmurphy@beckgroup com'. <bnanmurphy@beckgroup c
cc
Subject Staff report - Beck Project
01/09/2004 01 23 PM
Brlan,
Here's the Staff report
are groovy
Have a look and make sure that all the condltlons
<<Cleveland 628 Staff Report new format doc>>
Mark T Parry
Planner
Clty of Clearwater
Plannlng Department
727 562 4558
mark parry@myclearwater com
~
Tarapani, Cyndi
From.
Sent.
To.
Cc:
Subject:
Owens, Reginald W
Tuesday, December 30, 2003 2 07 PM
Harnger, Sandy, Wilson, Denise, Phillips, Sue, Akin, Pam
Kurtz, Timothy M , Bruch, Tracey, Campos, Geraldme, QUillen, Michael, Tarapanl, Cyndl,
Walbolt, Margo, Arasteh, Mahshld
Beck
We just completed a set of meetings today WIth Beck and the property managers for Clearwater Tower, Bank of Amenca
BUilding and the Post Office
The good news which came out of the meeting IS Beck disclosing that they are now planning on breaking ground In late
May, 2004
With the exception of a few glitches regarding replacement parkmg (taken care of admirably by Tracey Bruch/Garden
Avenue Garage), everyone IS WIlling to work around the construction
Specifically the Post Office WIll give Beck the nght to work WIthin their Side yard, and Beck IS gOing find them off site
space for 12 postal trucks and they WIll pay for extending our streetscape deSign Into about 30 feet of the alley separatmg
their bUlldmgs (as a little sitting areaJlandscape area) Beck and the POlS working out thiS easement between them
Clearwater Tower IS WIlling to allow Beck to Intrude slightly onto their Side yard, and they have no problem WIth the Idea
that Laura Street WIll become one way gOing east, as Beck needs to stage at the rear of their bUilding site
Bank of Amenca BUilding Management IS also WIlling to work WIth us m front of theIr bUlldmg so that our SIdewalk can
Intrude eventually onto their small plaza setback area In front of their front door (thiS bUilding IS about the only bUilding
downtown which actually SitS back from our row) I WIll be looking Into seeing If the CRA might be able to fund thiS
small area's renovation The property management company IS also WIlling to use our deign on some planned
Improvements they are thinking about on Garden Avenue frontage
Beck diSCUssed their construction fenCing concept on Station Square, and It IS ED's intention to bnng m the talent of the
Cultural/Arts office to make thiS a festive area
Tracey WIll be reporting back to us on the preferred method for collecting fees on the new garage
Thanks
1
~
~ani, Cyndi
From.
Sent
To:
Cc.
Subject
Owens, Reginald W
Fnday, December 26, 2003 9 08 AM
Akin, Pam
Harnger, Sandy, Arasteh, Mahshld, Tarapam, Cyndl, Simmons, Margie
RE AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT
Pam
I am sending up a hard copy with some comments noted
Questions
. The language on Infrastructure Improvements IS qUite detailed, but I think we need language indicating that Beck IS
agreeable to match our streetscape deSign on hiS ground level outdoor space In terms of matenals, landscaping,
colors
. P 37 Staging Area - add language "Developers agree to pay for bOXing and transporting to city storage those
eXisting live oak trees which have been tagged by Bellomo-Herbert, Inc, Landscape Architects for streetscape
retention All trees not tagged may be removed and disposed off
. If they default dunng construction, should we note that no Impact fees will be paid by the CRA
. We need language indicating that Developer agrees to landscape and Install hardscape on the Post Office property
With their wntten permission
. I did not see language on their responsibility to have a constructlonf'for sale" project sign With contact telephone
number, faCing Cleveland from inception (Important)
. Nor do I see any language spelling out their obligations to market thiS project from inception via media advertiSing
. Do we need to have them disclose who are the "Investors"
. Do we need a clause making them solely responsible for any damage to adjacent properties (tight constructIOn site)
. If we need to exercise the repurchase clause after 12 months, perhaps we need them to pay a penalty amount - they
would have tied up the site for nearly two years since the RFP
Rest looks fine - great job - thanks
-----Onglnal Message-----
From. Akin, Pam
Sent Thursday, December 18, 2003 2 49 PM
To Stone, Ralph, Tarapanl, Cyndl
Cc. Simmons, Margie, Owens, Reginald W , Arasteh, Mahshld
Subject: AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT
<<File Station Sqare Park Development draft 11-17-03 doc >> Draft for your review ThiS version IS not complete
DaVid owes me language and I have not added the none dlscnmlnatlon language But thiS would be a good time for
your Input
1
It 1~1J~ W- _ ~
~~~d/~~ _ _ "__.' _ ~
~ll//7J1~/~/QUlll/J1/teM ,. _.r -
.~. a1J~OJ:PJr~
1J~-9nu~ ~-att ~.~_
~ I ~/~-i/1J Cd'n~/b;-mm~
I f/U7Y~~dJ1~~~ . .,.. .
~~~, - ~;~..."_. -..
~~r/~'--- - '.~' .~~ ~- - ..' '.
~ - W~/. ~ -~"17*. -/Jt;~ h!/:hrtfY_~
~ --- - --~ .- ~ . -- - - - - - ~--- --- -. - -
if- .fM ~ ~~tJ,_//flP1MiF .,
13toK- .Il2 __(JtPg~ ~'$-_. c7J:!_~JJ~ _ ___
- - -.. ---- --........- ---- -.,..-.. - --- - --- - - - - ,.,....... - - - - - ... -~- --
fltlMJ-~"d ~ ~ _~ /~~h/i7Jql/jz .,
- ~~~PILIP_;W~____~_ _H__ _ ____
~fig ~~11!----tii- ~//i_~-~~ -' . - .. ~-~-
.- -- t - - . .- ------------- ----. -- - - - - .- ----~- -- -- - - -- ---
- - - n'l----- - ------- - - - -- ---
eest COr
J."a\\ab\~ --- -----~- - - -- - - --- ---
- - ---- 1--
~ani, Cyndi
From:
Sent.
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2 37 PM
Parry, Mark
Gerlock, Frank, Fierce, Lisa
Transportation Impact fee calculation on Beck
In reVleWIDg the transportation unpact fee calculations prepared by Bennett Elbo, I has some questions I would
appreciate tf you would evaluate 1t Wlth hun and check thts out
,
1 On the Traffic unpact fee assessment worksheet prepared by Bennett, he shows the eXiSting use as
restaurant for the 1 st and 2nd floors There 1S clearly not a restaurant there now nor do I remember a restaurant
smce I have been employed here Question 1S what 1S the source of thts mformation and 1S tlus restauant use
correct:> Also, what 18 the source generally for unpact fees, 1t seems 1t should be current occupational hcense,
unless the ordmance states othetwlse
2 Also, on the same worksheet, 1t shows the eXiSting bwldmg as 3 stones-I thought 1t was only 2 Please
confirm
3 On the second page of the overall Impact and Petmlt Fees worksheet prepared by ED, the detatled
estlmates for the transportation fees, show only 4840 plus 4600 as the total non-res1denttal square footage Tlus
should be a total of 15,000 sf to match the subrmtted slte plan I thmk tlus 18 only a typo smce the nght amount of
fee 1S shown from the assessment prepared by Bennett
Any questions, please call Thanks
Cyndi Tarapani
Planrung Dttector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fL com
1
I -~~
~4 ~ -~?
~(L6~L~~L/JlJ}mm~I-Il/.6W~#m~~
~~~L~~/t()ffi~~
tlMf~Q~4/~-~Mhl7~
!m~~~
/10 4?1~Jit-:t'O ~~~ti)
~~~a/'hhte ~~h7I:/~ .
&~~._~ait_~5 ~ /hJU ac:,
;V1~~ ~~- ~/~ .
-#2.- ~13 /1)tffi~0kJ7OY ~ ;iV .$~
----- iJ1kj2JdJ?I-.d?n)21 ~ ~ ~ _ . _ _ _
___ __ __~', -.::_ 1J/2i6 ~ /WP' ~~~-I-7.)JJ~ - ~ ~ "-~
___ __ i _ ~
=-f?;1;~~-9~~~~~-ii:~'1-
- .--_.. R-.' --~ - ~ ~f:::: J-@/ .
-- - ~ - j.~~- ~~-, ilPl~~-c1p --
- --- l-/Yy~'~~~-~.~',?-'-Y-
. . ~-- I -~ ~ ;;. .~~ - - t?}}2tJ ~-
_ _ "- __ .......__........_ _... _ __ _'" __~"'_ _ _ ~__ -..-- _1__
J2tJ::. il J!4;rzJJ-<:. ~f.- ~rr-tf!ff!::!?J~~: ". -
, - ------~1"1- '_.~.-::_4.:? ~/z'~~__
"
I
~ ._~ _~_ - _~ ~_~_-_ _ o. __ ___ ~:~-< .-~-~-. ______
fu;O_~1 m~ ~q,!: ~?ltJd _t~ ~?~a,/JaPL _.___
7?~O 111 '()-- L-'
, - I
}oli;()'-~/t;~ -~:- ~--;-_. ------.. .----.--
- - ~---- , -.- - ~~ ~~~-.- -- - - --~--~ - ~----" c - p~ ~~.~ - - ~ . -- - .0-
J 5'?v -z;.#~ Best 0
------ =~- :' - ~ _!~~---- -~-- -7--. =-=: = - ~ -~,~----uAvai'ab'e~~=_==~~--- -c~~ -~ -
I __ t5?YnA4
~ - ~_:o..._ ~ 1""::-- -- ~ ................'" ~f{) ~-~-:: ~~--=-=--_-----=c;.- -- ... ----~...-..",.--~ ... - ';to" ~ >C'-~-~-~~-_ -.- -~--
I
~/J, at!.?
~
...
November 18, 2003
EconoImc Development and Housmg Department
STATION SQUARE DEVELOPMENT
~ ,
DEVELOPMENTSU~Y
Square Footage:
Retail 15,000
Residential 184,800
Common Area 37,540
Total 237,340
Site Area S/F: 42.124
Residential Units 146
Const. Value $27,500,000
!!!!pact and Permit Fees
Total Impact and Permit Fees: $459,896.72 (*Not including miscellaneous fees. See below)
Permit Plan Transportation Sewer Sewer Sewer Water Water Water Radon Storm C.O. C.O.
Review Shops Rest. Condos Shops Rest. Condos State Water Condo Retail/Rest.
Surcharee
$50,095 47,425 114,881.32' 4,500 4,500 131,400 2,400 2,400 70,080 2,373.40 28,080 1,606 156
Miscellaneous Fees
Clearing/Grub $ 10.00 Alarms Based on Project Value
Tree Permit $3 per tree min$ 15.00 Gates/Fences Based on Project Value
Trailer 1 @ $ 155.00 Sign Based on Project Value
Power Pole 1 @ $ 37.00 Fire Sprinkler Based on Project Value
Exhaust Hood Based on Project Value
AFTER PERMITTING: PLANNING:
Plan Amendments Review Time $ 53/Hr min $53 CDB Approval $ 1205.00
Correction Notices $ 32 & $ 80 Comprehensive Sign Program $ 300.00
November 18,2003
1~~
EconOIDlC Development and Housmg Department
,
....
Method of Calculation and Notes
Transportation: " ~ "J
Condos 146@ $768 ~'OI'VV),~ 112,128.00
Retall $1,700 per 1,000sq ft@qft = 8,228.00
Rest. & Mezz 2,491 per 1,000 sq ft x ,6 0 q ft = 25,308.56
Credit from existing use = (30,783.24)
$114,881.32
= $ 2,400
= 2,400
= 70,080
= 70
= (1,200)
= (70)
Permit: $4,600 + $1.65 per $1,000 of value or fraction
Plan Review: $2,050 + $1.65 per $1,000 of value or fraction
*lDcIudes $30.00 trade fee Total: $120.00
= $ 50,095.00*
= 47,425.00
= 2,373.40
= $ 1,606.00
= 156.00
$ 73,680
Sewer:
5 retail spaces @ $ 900
Restaurant w/1.5" meter
Condominiums 146 @ $900
Credits for I" Domestic
State Surcharee: 237,340 sq ft @ 1 cent per sq ft
= $ 4,500
= 4,500
= 131,400
= (2.250)
C.O.'s
@
@
$11.00 each
$26.00 each
Residential 146
Comm'l 5
$ 138,150
. Stormwater payment-lD-lieu of quoted Beck 10/13/03 $28,080 (Brian Barker, Manager x4779)
. Re-inspectIon Fees are the responsibility of the contractor or developer.
. Fees associated with Plan Amendments and Right of Way Pernnts are not lDcluded.
. The fees shown on this document are based on the lDformation prOVIded to us from Economic Development regardlDg the proposed project located at Station Square.
. These fees are subject to change based on the information at hand and are to be used only as an estimate.
. Water and sewer tap and meter deposit fees are not lDcJuded.
. TransportatIon Impact Fee information provided by Bennett Elbo.
. Existmg Water Meter lDformation provided by City of Clearwater UtIlIties Dept.
/]
11/24/?013 17:51
7275624"'~-
ENG
3E . 02/03
,
I
1t~
p
"
I
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE (AS~,E .SMENT)
Datl~: Nov,mber 25, 2003
>/'
ProJec~e. Station Square Park
I
Address/L~tatfon'
I
[
(
628 Cleveland St.
Clearwater, Fl
I
Calculation~
L
Schedule "Bi'rates '> 'A .r<1/1
Exis~lng building area - pt floor: 5,0143 sq.ft. t') . _~ r~
(' 2nd floor' 2,85/ sq.ft. I j?lf/IVV-
" 3rd floor; 5,06~ sq.ft ~
Prevl~3us use: 1st and 2nd floor, Sit dOl/in 'estauran ~.,~ 16
:, 3rd floor.~ral off~ ""_.'?I'V~~_
Prop~sal: Condominiums ~~ ~J~
I, General Commercial
Restaurant
CRE:n [T
~l:~-'I"'-
,kTh . '., ' \, (_,' :"
'_. 'j , H _ " .
:~,<:_,,,':'i,l~i~_ .' ,.<1 -;__'" :'" ___'~_d
SIt lown Restaur.lt
- .~
iener:il Office l
)ij
,
7,940
5.083
$2,491/1000sq.f1.
$2,1SS/1000sq f1
$19,778.54
$11,004 695
~
~~M
~'#l:JI/pJ~
I,
$768 I $112,128.00
1,700/1 ,000sq f $8,228 00
2,491/1000sq fl $25,308.56
Total: $145,664.56
( ondo nimums'
-- ,
Oel eral ( ommeroll~1
-- t/
Reslal ant ,^Ith Me~nl
b
Best Copy
Avail~b'e
~_.... -
~A
.I
11/24/~01 3 17:51 7275624-
-- i~'
ENG
,
Traffic I",act Fee Due ($):
Credlt(s) ($).
I, ..
;1 OTAL Owed($).
Ini~IJls of Evaluator'
I
,
Sl9n~ture of Evaluator.
I
I
Ii
I
I'
f
"
I
,
, ,
I
I
eest coPY
Av.,\ab\.
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
1<
I
I
I'
I
I
(
r
$145,664.56
-$30, 782 ~
$114,881 3
Bf?
~~ -#r-
3E . 03/03
Iv
III
,I
II
I
I
j&,~~~_~~~/JJ8 ~. .. . - .. .. . ... .~..~ .... . .
/AffJ/ fkyyJ ~~ //JAA"~V'-J _ _" _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _
YC_'11~'_,L!/ L<ftIJ! La/t.(f/'~ - - - - --- -
'iJmmc4f//b~/ ~~/~/#-tJJy~/(
_~/~/M~
- -- - -~1~ i - d_ - -- - --
~~~. . 80"/b'~fIA . B:::i~:!
~%*~. :;:~~r;;/~/;~~]~
11i .+~~.? .
/mA~~d --/a?~. ~~~~
~ ;4~~ -tnJn/~Itig~/un~-f{5(~
jivn'-7t.O/f~15 ~::::: /llAX-a//~'ofJ: . ·
.. 11i - ... .. .. ~?~~~~~
III
r;;;;J It Pi/: tJ;j ~~de- ~blq; -~j?r~(;:
{,!::'!JJl" !! ~ie /. ~. a to..... ~ tJY /b1~-
I~ / VI' tJC>>?a'/?7z;;, "'tJ ~ ~~/b /~
jjl /~~
~d $7 - /FOOIl/pJJ i/hl.. ~y
III /) .--.~"" ;;::;(. ... ;'
ill {jQ17fY ~(5h - -
Iii &II~ o/,p/tJJIe. ~ if)-: /V7&iJ. p);};c
~r a~ -
I
)hJui),~ /.?~/7
- ~M/~~~;tg~;ffh--
I:! f'J7/t-1v ~ (3/{Jw~ m~ It) a/~
I II:
, II
III
, II
I I
J i
11'1
'1,1
! '
,
__ Jil/J. -:. ~- I_--~- ~__ - - ____ __ - ___~.______ ___ ___ ____" _. - - _.__ ___ __ ___ __ __ ___ ____ - ___________ -
~
~-~~~~~dO-~;.~.... ~... -.~~ ..~~~~~..~.~-......~
-I~ .u~. _u. .....~ ~..~ ~m
... t~lMt$-.. ... _ - -~ ~~~.- . M~ -_~ ..u . ..._ u ... .
.... .~ ~~-m .._~- . ~ ~~... ~U~ . ....-~_.. ~- ..... .. ...._~- -
~~~4>>.-~-:Mm~a.-?C{. .. ... . ._...u_ .. u__ ...-- -- ..
/ I~;~ ~~_~ ~_~ - ... ...
. . If' ~ lie ~~... ~-- ..~... .. -.- . ~L~ . uu__ dU.. ~
~t-mk/1J~. - --------- _~u
~jt)il~ / h--' --__ _ <f/~~ ?J"' -
_ ~lL- - - ~~ ~ffJfI~?:h! - ?//~~
. 111 --y --
j , I _ n. ___
- ~lt- - - - - - - - - - . --- -- - - - --- --
Pfitij~A ~ ~/iJt_ t1>J _ - __~./kt;; _ --
lJi/~ pi: f?7'>:w.ki. - ... .. -~ /- .
lJI ~~/6 _ . ... u u .. . .
fl;;-~~./~i//~I?J 'fffj/W!~tfiU!.
'1 I
C"L
Iljl
:;11
~jl
'1 I
I I
t 1-
,II!
It ~ I
tJJ
hi'
I~ It
,II
"P
::1:
liil
~1t
il!
,'I
,/1
III
III
~ It
ql
;1]
:H
:'
IiI
11
j1
, ,
eest Copy
Available
J...
City of Clearwater Planning Department Staff Report
Commumty Development Board MeetIng
Date
Case Number
ApplIcant
Address
January 20. 2004
FLD2003-10056
CRA. Tone 40. Ltd
628 Cleveland Street
DRAFT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Request: FleXIble Development approval to permIt a bUIldIng WIthIn the reqUIred SIght VlSlbIlIty
tnangles along the front (north) sIde of the SIte along Laura Street, reduce the reqUIred number of
parkIng spaces from 388 spaces to 226 spaces, Increase the permItted heIght from 30 feet to 158
feet and Increase the permItted denSIty from 61 dwellIng umts to 146 dwellIng umts by USIng 85
dwellIng umts from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan area denSIty pool, as a
ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the prOVlSlons of SectIOn 2-903 C and a
ComprehensIve Landscape Program to elImInate the reqUIrement to proVIde foundatlon plantIngs,
under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Downtown Dlstnct (D)/Central BUSIness Dlstnct ClaSSIficatIOn
(CBD)
Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Character District: Downtown Core
Property Use: Current Use ParkIng lot/retaIl sales and servIce, Proposed Use MIxed Use (146
attached dwellIngs, 5,096 square feet of retaIl sales and servIce and 9,904 square feet of restaurant)
Adjacent Land Use/Zoning: North D - RetaIl sales and servIce, South D - RetaIl sales and
servIce, East D - Governmental use (Post Office), West D - Park (StatIOn Square Park)
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: The SIte IS 0 97 acres located on the north SIde of
Cleveland Street, approxImately 500 feet west of North Myrtle Avenue It IS a through lot WIth
frontage along Cleveland (south) and Laura (north) Streets and has been developed WIth a 13,000
square foot, three-story bUIldIng constructed In 1933 and an . space CIty-owned, publIc parkIng
lot Two dnveways currently proVIde access to the SIte WIth one dnveway along the front (south)
SIde of the SIte along Cleveland Street and a second along the front (north) SIde of the SIte along
Laura Street The eXIstIng bUIldIng and parkIng spaces WIll be demolIshed WIth thIS proposal The
CIty has Identlfied thIS SIte as a pnonty candIdate for redevelopment and reVItalIzatIOn for the
Downtown The SIte IS located WIthIn and governed by the Downtown Core character dlstnct of
the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Rea WIthIn the center of Downtown Uses In the
area Include a vanety of nonresldentlal establIshments such as office, retaIl sales and servIce,
restaurant, governmental uses, etc
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-10056 - Page 1
4
, !
Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The sIte IS located wIthm the Downtown Core
character dIStnCt of the pendmg Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan ThIS area IS
recogmzed as the economIC and geographIc heart of Downtown Clearwater The Clearwater
Downtown Redevelopment Plan recommends that thIS area be fully redeveloped m terms of
stre~ .~g and a mIX of resIdentIal and non-resIdentIal uses SpecIfically, It
recOllm0.t tl1~~evelopment of the Downtown Core as a fmmly-onented entertamment
destmatIOn recogmzmg that a key component reqUIred to dIversIfy the Downtown Core IS to attract
resIdentIal uses WIth a vanety of housmg types and pnces ThIS strategy has been IdentIfied as a
way to stImulate the redevelopment of property m the area and to reposItIon the Downtown as a
VIable economIC entIty m the regIOn
To aSSIst m the transformatIOn of Downtown Clearwater mto a quahty place m whIch to hve, work
and play, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan estabhshes a denSIty pool of IJII
dwelhng umts avatlable for key projects The apphcant IS proposmg the use of 85 dwelhng umts
from the denSIty pool
The CIty CommISSIOn adopted the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan on September 18,
2003 The Pmellas Planmng CounCIl has reVIewed the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment
Plan and has recommended approval pendmg a few mmor changes These changes are expected
to be reVIewed __ by the CIty CommISSIOn on .. (first readmg) and .. (second
readmg)
The development IS otherwIse proceedmg assummg that the County wIll approve the Clearwater
Downtown Redevelopment Plan m early February 2004 The Cleanllater Downtown Redevelop-
ment Plan estabhshes cntena agamst whIch proposals to be located wIthm the Clearwater
Downtown Redevelopment Plan area are measured and are dIscussed further m thIS report The
Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan must be approved for the development to proceed and
the Beck project must be conSIstent WIth the Plan, whIch It IS The apphcant IS aware that the
SImultaneous reVIew of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and theIr project
constItutes a nsk but deSIres to move forward WIth the proposal
In addItIon, whtle the accompanymg DeSIgn GUIdelmes are sttll under development, the CIty has
agreed to consIder projects pnor to completIOn of the gUIdelmes so that potentIal projects are not
lost to other competmg locatIOns In revIewmg thIS proposal, the CIty staff used as gUIdance the
eXIstmg gUIdelmes, reVIewed the gUIdelmes of other CItIes and then evaluated alternatIve deSIgns
WIth the developer to achIeve a deSIgn solutIOn that meets the reqUIrements of the Clearwater
Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the mtent of the eXIstmg DeSIgn GUIdelmes and the DeSIgn
GUIdehnes currently under development
The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan contemplates that the Commumty Development
Board (CDB) wIll reVIew projects whIch seek to make use of the denSIty pool Subsequent to the
CDB reVIew the Commumty Redevelopment Agency (CRA) wIll reVIew and approve the
Development Agreement WIth the developer
DRAFT Staff Report - Commuruty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-1 0056 - Page 2
The proposal IS consIstent wIth the Goals, ObjectIves and PolIcIes of the mcludmg
1 Goal 1 Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for hvmg, employment and
recreatlOn The Czty shall encourage redevelopment that wzll attract reszdents and vzsztors
to Downtown as a recreatlOn, entertamment and shoppmg destmatlOn ThIS project wIll
provIde the densIty reqUIred to begm to create a thnvmg, vIbrant downtown through the
addItIon of 146 dwellIng UnIts and up to 15,000 square feet of retaIl and restaurant space,
2 OblectIve 1 E A varzety of busmesses are encouraged to relocate and expand m Downtown
to provzde a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunztzes for Downtown
Reszdents ThIS development WIll provIde up to 15,000 square feet of hIgh qualIty retaIl and
restaurant space actIvely encouragmg busmesses to locate and expand m the Downtown,
3 OblectIve 1 G Reszdentzal uses m Downtown are encouraged wzth a varzety of densztzes,
housmg types and affordabzhty conszstent wzth the character dzstrzcts The develo ment
mcludes 146 dwellIng UnIts WIth a vanety of floor plans and pnces rangmg from
4 OblectIve 1 H The Czty shall use all exzstmg mcentzves to encourage Downtown housmg
and shall evaluate other mcentzves to encourage reszdentzal uses to located Downtown
The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provIdes a densIty pool from whIch
developments may acqUIre addItIonal dwellIng UnIts ThIS project mcludes usmg 85
dwellmg UnIts from that pool to achIeve the desIred densIty for the SIte mcreasmg the
VIabIlIty of the project,
5 Goal 3 Create Downtown as a memorable place to be enjoyed by reszdents and vzsztors
that capztalzzes on Clearwater's waterfront locatzon, natural resources, bUllt envzronment
and hzstory The project WIll effectIvely mcrease densIty wlthm the Downtown Core whIle
provldmg for an actIve streets cape WIth the provlSlon of retaIl and restaurant spaces on the
first floor along Cleveland Street The proposal mcludes an attractIve bUIldmg and
extenSIve landscapmg whIch WIll enhance, complement and be coordmated WIth the the
proposed Streetscapmg and Wayfindmg Plan and the redevelopment of StatIOn Square
Park,
6 OblectIve 3D Redevelopment zs encouraged to create a vzbrant Downtown envzronment
contaznzng a varzety of buzldmg forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and
herztage The proposal mcludes a bUIldmg that, whIle 158 feet m overall heIght WIll
complement the eXIstmg pattern of development along Cleveland Street by provIdmg two
15-foot stepbacks one each at the thIrd and seventh floors These stepbacks WIll result m
the appearance to a passerby on the street of a bUIldmg m harmony WIth other bUIldmgs m
the area WIth the bulk of the bUIldmg stepped back 30 feet from the fa<;ade of the first 30
feet of the bUIldmg,
7 PolIcy 6 The Czty shall establzsh a Publzc Amenztzes Incentzve Pool that provzdes denszty
and mtenszty mcreases for prOjects located m all character dzstrzcts, except as lzmzted m
Old Bay, m excess of the allowable maxzmum development potentzal based on a prOVZSlOn
of selected amenztzes, ThIS development utIlIzes 85 dwellIng UnIts from the denSIty pool
created by the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan
DRAFT Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-1 0056 - Page 3
The proposal IS also consIstent WIth Downtown Core character dIstnct PolIcIes mcludmg
I PolIcy 4 StatlOn Square Park shall be recreated as an actzve Downtown Park servzng as a
"pocket park" for Downtown employees and speczal events The proposal mcludes
locatmg a restaurant wIth II outdoor seats adjacent to Cleveland Street and StatIOn
Square Park and wIll contnbute posItIvely to StatIon Square Park In addItIon, the
proposed landscapmg for the sIte WIll be coordmated wIth the landscapmg to be part of the
redevelopment of StatIOn Square Park,
2 PolIcy 7 To ensure a pedestrzan-frzendly and safe envzronment, drzveways shall be
dzscouraged on Cleveland Street between Myrtle Avenue and Osceola Avenue The
proposal mcludes removmg an eXIstmg curb cut along Cleveland Street and provIdmg
access exclusIvely along Laura Street VIa a two-way dnveway, and
3 PolIcy 8 Redevelopment and new constructlOn along Cleveland Street shall be compatzble
wzth and contrzbute to pedestrzan vztalzty, human scale and hzstorzc fabrzc The
development mcludes a bUIldmg that wIll contrIbute to pedestnan vItalIty by provIdmg a
restaurant wIth outdoor seatmg at the southwest comer of the sIte adjacent to StatIOn
Square Park and Cleveland Street In addItIon, dIsplay wmdows and actIve retaIl uses wIll
be provIded along and accessIble from Cleveland Street It wIll have a human scale by
steppmg the bulk of the bUIldmg back at 30 feet and 70 feet above grade The development
wIll complement the hIstonc fabnc of Downtown Clearwater by "borrowmg" archItectural
features and detaIls from surroundmg bUIldmg mcludmg the use of stonework, stucco,
arches, extensIve wmdow dIsplays and canopIes and awmngs
Proposal: The proposal mcludes a mIxed-use development wIth 146 attached dwellIngs, 5,096
square feet of retaIl sales and servIce and 9,904 square feet of restaurant wIthm a bUIldmg 158 feet
m heIght The bUIldIng wIll be located approxImately 15 feet from the front (north) property lIne
along Laura Street and wIthm the reqUIred SIght VlSlbIlIty tnangles on eIther sIde of the dnveway
Structured parkmg wIll be provIded wIthm the first three floors of the bUIldmg and wIll mclude a
total of 326 spaces wIth 226 spaces dedIcated for the 146 attached dwellIng umts where 219 are
reqUIred, three dedIcated spaces for the proposed restaurant where 149 spaces are reqUIred and two
dedIcated spaces for the proposed retaIl sales and servIce space where 20 are reqUIred The
proposal also mcludes 100 publIc parkmg spaces The total reqUIred parkmg IS 388 spaces and
226 spaces wIll be provIded wIth an addItIonal 100 publIc spaces for a total of 326 spaces The
eXIstmg dnveway along Cleveland Street wIll be removed wIth thIS proposal and a smgle dnveway
located at the northeast comer of the sIte along Laura Street wIll pIovIde access to the sIte and
bUIldmg
The proposal mcludes the ImplementatIOn of landscapmg on the sIte coordmated WIth the CIty m
order to complement the landscapIng proposed wIth the Streetscape and WayfindIng Master Plan
and the proposed StatIOn Square Park redevelopment to be mstalled between 2004 and 2006 as
outlIned m the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan The landscape plan should enhance
the aesthetIcs of the sIte
DRAFT Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-10056 - Page 4
The maIn entrance to the bUlldIng wIll be along Cleveland Street and Includes a formal, arched
entrance upscale and elegant In character bIfurcatIng the bUlldIng The south elevatIOn also
Incorporates colonnade elements wIth arches and canopIes The proposed matenals WIll be stucco
and _ wIth natural colors The desIgn of the bUlldIng features maSSIng whIch steps
back as elevatIOn Increases, creatIng InterestIng elevatIOns along the skylIne and proVIdes for a
bUlldIng whIch WIll blend In WIth the eXIstIng scale of bUll dIngs along Cleveland Street The
Cleveland (south) and Laura Street (north) elevatIOns WIll feature balcomes, canopIes and
extensIve artIculatIOn of the fenestratIOn proVIdIng addItIonal aesthetIc Interest The multIple
levels of structured arkIn WIll be camouflaged by the bUlldIng deSIgn and hIdden from VIew
through the use of
A 30-foot WIde no-bUlld area IS IdentIfied In the adjacent StatIon Square Park that WIll preclude
any permanent structures ThIS IS due to the BUlldIng Code lImItIng bUlldIngs WIth opemngs
(WIndows, doors, etc) WIthIn IJ feet of a property lIne
The restaurant and retaIl components of the development WIll be accessed from the Cleveland
Street The restaurant WIll Include an outdoor seatIng area wIth. seats at the southwest comer
of the SIte adjacent to StatIOn Square Park and WIll pOSItIVely contnbute to an actIve streetscape
and StatIOn Square Park
SolId waste servIces WIll be proVIded VIa two roll-out dumpsters at the northwest comer of the SIte
along Laura Street All stormwater reqUlrements have been met WIth thIS proposal
The character of the proposed development WIll set the tone for a VIbrant and lIvely Downtown
through addItIon of dwellIng umts, retaIl and restaurant space
ThIS applIcatIOn for FleXIble Development approval Includes speCIfic requests to permIt a bUll dIng
WIthIn the reqUlred SIght VlSlbIlIty tnangles, reduce the reqUlred number of parkIng spaces from
388 spaces to 226 spaces, Increase the permItted heIght from 30 feet to 158 feet and Increase the
permItted denSIty from 61 dwellIng umts to 146 dwellIng umts by USIng 85 dwellIng umts from the
Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan area denSIty pool, as a ComprehensIve Infill
Redevelopment ProJect, under the proVISIOns of SectIon 2-903 C and a ComprehensIve Landscape
Program to elImInate the reqUlrement to prOVIde foundatIOn p1antIngs, under the proVISIOns of
SectIOn 3-1202 G
The Increase In heIght above 30 feet IS conSIstent WIth the VISIOn, Goals, ObjectIves and PolICIes
of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan as outlIned above and IS conSIstent WIth the
cntena for a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project The elImInatIOn of the SIght VISIbIlIty
tnangles on the north SIde of the SIte IS needed to maIntaIn and create the deSIred buIld-to lIne
along Laura Street
Cleveland and Laura Streets currently servIce the eXIstIng bUll dIng and publIc parkIng lot located
on the SIte A curb cut along Cleveland Street WIll be elImInated WIth thIS proposal and a SIngle
two-way dnveway WIll proVIde access to the bUll dIng from Laura Street
DRAFT Staff Report- Commuruty Development Board- January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-10056 - Page 5
Development A2reement
The proposal also mcludes a request of, and recommendatIOn to the CIty CommISSIOn on, a
development agreement that sets forth pubhc/pnvate obhgatIOns The CIty recognIzes the
economIC and aesthetic benefits that wIll result from pnvate development The apphcant also
recognIzes the benefit of pubhc Improvements that dIrectly affect the marketablhty of the project
and the character of the general area surroundmg the project
The development agreement IS attached for the Commumty Development Board pubhc heanng
and recommendatIOn to the CIty CommISSIOn In summary, the development agreement reqmres
the followmg
1 That the property must be closed upon wlthm 90 days of approval of the Development
Agreement by the Commumty Redevelopment Agency (CRA),
2 That construction must commence wlthm one-year of closmg on the property or otherwIse
Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, WhICh reqmres that an apphcatIOn for a bmldmg permIt shall be
made wlthm one year of FleXIble Development approval, whIChever occurs first,
3 That 100 parkmg spaces be desIgnated for pubhc park!ng,
4 That retall uses be hmlted to
a) RetaIl estabhshments that sell or lease goods dIrectly to the consumer (1 e book store,
gtft shops, antique store, flonst, clothmg store, VIdeo store, etc ),
b) Art Gallenes,
c) Gourmet grocery stores wIth accessory sales of alcohohc beverages The gourmet
grocery store may also mclude prepared food for off-SIte consumptIOn,
d) Restaurants wIth accessory sales of alcohohc beverages, and
e) SIdewalk cafes as accessory to the pnnclpal retall uses
5 That the followmg uses be prohIbIted
a) All uses prohIbIted by the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan,
b) All other retaIl uses not specIfically Identified above, pursuant to the Commumty
Development Code's defimtIOn ofretall sales and servIce,
c) NIghtclub/Bar,
d) AlcoholIc Beverage Package Store,
e) MedIcal or Vetennary offices, and
f) Any other use determmed by the Commumty Development Coordmator not to share the
charactenstIcs of "allowable retall uses"
6 That the developer shall actively market and use hls/her best efforts to obtam tenants for
the first floor retall space as one or more of the allowable retall uses descnbed above
Should the developer be unable to obtam an allowable retaIl use as descnbed above wlthm
one year of Issuance of the temporary CertIficate of Occupancy for the retall space, the CIty
may allow, upon wntten request of the developer, one of more of the followmg alternate
uses to occupy the first floor retall space of the bmldmg
a) TaIlor/seamstress,
b) Dry cleaners,
c) Fmanclal InstitutIOn,
d) Busmess office other than medIcal or vetennary office, and
e) Personal servIces
DRAFT Staff Report - Commuruty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-1 0056 - Page 6
7 That whenever an alternate use tenant vacates the retml space, the developer or desIgnee
shall use hIs/her best efforts to re-establIsh the retaIl space wIth an allowable use as defined
In number four above,
8 That the CIty shall be responSIble for normal repmrs and maIntenance of all publIc spaces,
the CIty shall pay a maIntenance fee for common elements (1 e roof, walls, floors, elevator
and stmrwells) and, as the CIty IS the owner of the 100 publIc parkIng spaces, It WIll have
membershIp In condo aSSOCiatIOn
The CIty ComrmssIOn may enter mto development agreements to encourage a stronger
commItment on comprehensIve and capItal faCIlItIes plannIng, ensure the provlSlon of adequate
publIc facIlItIes for development, encourage the efficIent use of resources, and reduce the
economIC cost of development The CDB IS reqUIred to reVIew the proposed development
agreement and make a recommendatIOn to the CIty CommISSIOn
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstandIng enforcement Issues aSSOCiated WIth thIS
SIte
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
Redevelopment Plan and Code Section 2-903):
(Clearwater Downtown
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT I INCONSISTENT
DenSIty 146 X
ImpervIOUS surface
ratIo 093 X
Lot area 42,361 square feet X
Lot WIdth 182 feet X
HeIght 158 feet X
Parkmg spaces Attached DwellIngs 221
spaces
Retml 2 spaces X
Restaurant 3 spaces
Pubhc Parkmg 100 spaces
Total 326 spaces
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Code Section 2-903.C):
Criteria Consistent Inconsistent
[he development or redevelopment of the parcel
1 proposed for development IS otherwIse ImpractIcal [X] [ ]
WIthout deVIatIOns from the use, IntenSIty and
development standards
DRAFT Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-10056 - Page 7
\
Criteria Consistent Inconsistent
T'he development of the parcel proposed for development as a
2 20mprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project wIll not reduce the [X] [ ]
aIr market value of abuttmg propertIes
3 IThe uses wIthm the ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project [X] [ ]
~e otherwIse permItted m the CIty of Clearwater
4 The use or mIX of uses WIthm the ComprehensIve Infill [X] [ ]
Redevelopment Project IS compatIble wIth adjacent land uses
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a
5 ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project wIll upgrade the [X] [ ]
mmedIate vIcImty of the parcel proposed for development
The desIgn of the proposed ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment
6 Project creates a form and functIOn whIch enhances the [ ]
ommumty character of the ImmedIate vIcImty of the parcel [X]
Jroposed for development and the CIty of Clearwater as a whole
FlexIbIhty m regard to lot WIdth, requIred setbacks, heIght and
7 pff-A venue parkmg are JustIfied by the benefits to commumty [X] [ ]
~haracter and the Immediate vIcImty of the parcel proposed for
~evelopment and the CIty of Clearwater as a whole
Adequate off-street parkmg m the ImmedIate vIcImty accordmg to
8 he shared parkmg formula m DIVISIOn 14 of ArtIcle 3 WIll be [X] [ ]
avaIlable to aVOId on-street parkmg m the ImmedIate vIcImty of
he parcel proposed for development
9 The deSIgn of all bmldmgs comphes WIth the Downtown DIstnct [X] [ ]
deSIgn gmdehnes m DIVISIon 5 of ArtIcle 3
DRAFT Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-1 0056 - Page 8
r,
'.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS (Code Section 3-913):
Criteria
Consistent
Inconsistent
1
Development of the land wIll be m hannony wIth the scale, bulk,
coverage, denSIty and character of adjacent
[ ]
[X]
2
Development WIll not hmder or dIscourage development and use of
adjacent land and bmldmgs or sIgmficantly ImpaIr the value thereof
[ ]
[X]
3
Development WIll not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
resIdmg or workmg m the neIghborhood of the proposed use
[ ]
[X]
4
Development IS deSIgned to mmImIze traffic congestIOn
[X]
[ ]
5
Development IS conSIstent WIth the commumty character of the
ImmedIate vIcImty
[ ]
[X]
6
DeSIgn of the proposed development mmImIzes adverse effects,
mcludmg VIsual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operatIOn Impacts
on adjacent propertIes
[ ]
[X]
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development ReVIew CommIttee reVIewed the applIcatIOn and supportmg matenals on
December 4, 2003 The applIcant has worked WIth staff over the past several months to prOVIde an
attractIve, well-deSIgned development that wIll enhance the local area and CIty as a whole The
development WIll further the CIty'S goals of Improvmg the character of area and promotmg pnvate
sector mvestment wIthm the Downtown
The proposal IS m complIance WIth the standards and cntena for FleXIble Development approval
for ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project use, WIth all applIcable standards of the
Commumty Development Code and IS conSIstent WIth the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment
Plan The Board shall make a separate motIon for recommendatIOn to the CIty CommISSIOn for
the SIte plan request and Development Agreement request
DRAFT Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-10056 - Page 9
'\
..
The Planmng Department recommends APPROVAL of the FlexIble Development applIcatIOn to
permIt a bUIldmg wlthm the reqUIred SIght VISIbIlIty tnangles, reduce the reqUIred number of
parkmg spaces from 388 spaces to 226 spaces, mcrease the permItted heIght from 30 feet to 158
feet and mcrease the permItted densIty from 61 dwellIng UnIts to 146 dwellmg UnIts by usmg 85
dwellmg umts from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan area densIty pool, as a
ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provISIOns of SectIOn 2-903 C and a
ComprehensIve Landscape Program to elImmate the reqUIrement to proVIde foundatIOn plantmgs,
under the provISIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G for the sIte at 628 Cleveland Street, wIth the followmg
bases and condItIOns
Bases for Approval
1 The proposal complIes wIth the FlexIble Development cntena as a ComprehensIve Infill
Redevelopment Project per SectIOn 2-903 C
2 The proposal IS m complIance wIth other standards m the Code mcludmg the General
ApplIcabIlIty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913
3 The proposal IS m complIance wIth the VISIOn, Goals, Objects and PolICIes of the Clearwater
Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character dlstnct
4 The development IS compatIble WIth the surroundmg area and wIll enhance other
redevelopment efforts
CondItIOns of Approval
1 That all sIgnage meet the reqUIrements of Code and be archltecturally-mtegrated WIth the
deSIgn of the bUIldmg WIth regards to color, matenals and finIsh,
2 That no freestandmg SIgnS of any kmd be permItted on the sIte,
3 That a final SIgn package be submItted to and approved by Staff pnor to the Issuance of any
permIts whIch shows
a) All sIgnS fully dImenSIOned and coordmated m terms of mcludmg the same color and font
style and SIze, and
b) That all SIgnS be constructed of the hIghest qualIty matenals whIch are coordmated WIth
the colors, matenals and archItectural style of the bUIldmg,
4 That sIgnage be lImIted to SIgnS on the canopIes OR attached dIrectly to the bUIldmg,
5 That all vehIcles be completely screened from VIew from all SIdes of the subject SIte,
6 That the furnIture used for the outdoor seatmg component of the restaurant WIll be of the
hIghest qualIty and that no sIgnage of any kmd wIll be mcluded on any portIOn of the furnIture
mcludmg but not lImIted to the chaIrs, tables, planters and/or umbrellas,
7 That a TransportatIOn Impact Fee be paId pnor to the Issuance of a CertIficate of Occupancy,
8 That all FIre Department reqUIrements be met pnor to the Issuance of any permIts,
9 That payment m lIeu of stormwater faCIlItIes by paId pnor to the Issuance of any permIts,
10 That a final landscape whIch matches and complements the landscapmg proposed for the
StatIOn Square Park redevelopment the Streetscapmg Plan be submItted to and approved by
Staff pnor to the Issuance of any permIts,
11 That retaIl uses be lImIted to
a) RetaIl establIshments that sell or lease goods dIrectly to the consumer (1 e book store, gIft
shops, antIque store, flonst, clothmg store, VIdeo store, etc ),
b) Art Gallenes,
DRAFT Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-l0056 - Page 10
,-
II
-
.
c) Gourmet grocery stores wIth accessory sales of alcoholIc beverages The gourmet grocery
store may also mclude prepared food for off-sIte consumptIOn,
d) Restaurants wIth accessory sales of alcoholIc beverages, and
e) SIdewalk cafes as accessory to the pnnclpal retail uses
12 That the followmg uses be prohIbIted
a) All uses prohIbIted by the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan,
b) All other retail uses not specIfically IdentIfied above, pursuant to the Commumty
Development Code's defimtIOn of retail sales and servIce,
c) NIghtclub/Bar,
d) AlcoholIc Beverage Package Store,
e) MedIcal or Vetennary offices, and
f) Any other use determmed by the Commumty Development Coordmator not to share the
charactenstIcs of "allowable retaIl uses"
13 That the developer shall actIvely market and use lus/her best efforts to obtam tenants for the
first floor retaIl space as one or more of the allowable retail uses descnbed above,
14 That should the developer be unable to obtam an allowable retail use as descnbed above wlthm
one year of Issuance of the temporary CertIficate of Occupancy for the retaIl space, the CIty
may allow, upon wntten request of the developer, one of more of the followmg alternate uses
to occupy the first floor retail space of the bU1ldmg
a) Tailor/seamstress,
b) Dry cleaners,
c) FmanClal InstItutIOn,
d) Busmess office other than medIcal or vetennary office, and
e) Personal servIces
15 That whenever an alternate use tenant vacates the retail space, the developer or deSIgnee shall
use hls/her best efforts to re-establIsh the retail space WIth an allowable use as defined m
condItIon number 10 above, and
16 That constructIOn be commenced wlthm one year of closmg
Prepared by Planmng Department Staff
Mark T Parry, Planner
ATTACHMENTS
Aenal Photograph of SIte and Vlclmty
LocatIOn Map
Future Land Use Map
Zomng Atlas Map
ApplIcatIOn
C \Documents and Settmgs\lfiercelLocal Settmgs\Temporary Internet FzlesI OLK36ISAMPLE-- STAFF REPORT Lady Mary N 100 doc
DRAFT Staff Report- Commumty Development Board - January 20 2004 - Case FLD2003-10056 -- Page II
EconomIc Development and Housmg Department
STATION SQUARE DEVELOPMENT
Determination of Impact Fees
/f,/$.~~.
November 18,2003
Permit Plan Transportation Sewer Sewer Sewer Water Water Water State **C.O. **C.O.
Review Shops Rest. Condos Shops Rest. Condos Surchar2e Condos Comm'l
$49,975 47,425 135,610' 4,500 4,500 131,400 2,400 2,400 70,080 2,373 1,606 156
Total Impact Fees: $452,425 + Storm-water Buy-In: $28,080 = $480,505
$4,600 + $1.65 per $1,000 of value or fraction = $ 45,850
$2,050 + $1.65 per $1,000 of value or fraction =$ 43,300
Condos 146 units @ $794 =$115,924
Retail $1,700 per 1000 sq ft x 4840 sq ft = 8,228
Rest. $2,491 per 1,000 sq ft x 4600 sq ft = 11.458
$135,610
Ellll'h 2) 1:\00 ~q ft Qr fraetiou thereof @ $250 $ 36,000
Water.=. 5 retail spaces wI 5/8" water meters @ $480 = $ 2,400
Restaurant wI 1.5" meter = 2,400
Condominiums 146 @$480 = 70,080
Permit:
Plan Review:
Transportation:
Sewer: 5 retail spaces @ $900
Restaurant wI 1.5" meter
Condominiums 146 @ $900
ne1l'819pmeBt:
= 4,500
= 4,500
=131,400
~
State Surchar2e:
237,340 sq ft @ 1 cent per sq ft
Miscellaneous Fees
~
* including credit of $10,030
** residential CO's = $11.00 each
comm'l CO's = $26.00
DEVELOPMlliNTSUMMARY
Area SIF: 42,124
Square Footage:
Retail 15,000
Residential 184,800
Common Area 37,540
Total 237,340
Residential Units 146
Const. Value $27,500,000
= $ 2,373
Alarms
GateslFences
Sign
Clearing/Grub
Tree Permit
Trailer
Power Pole
Fire Sprinkler
Lawn Meter
CDB Approval
Com rehensive Si n Pro
Based on Project Value
Based on Project Value
Based on Project Value
$ 10.00
$3 per tree min $ 15
1 @ $155.00
@ 37.00
Based on Project Value
----L $ 75.00
$ 1205.00
am $ 300.00
~~ote: Stormwater buy-in quoted Beck 10/13/03
$28,080 (Brian Barker, Manager x4779)
Unitlity ConnectionlTap fees pending
. The fees shown on thiS document are based on the mformatIon provided to us regardmg the proposed project located at StatIon Square.
. These fees are subject to change based on the mformatIon at hand and are to be used only as an estimate.
. Re-mspectIon Fees are the responsibilIty of the contractor or developer.
. Fees associated with Plan Amendments and RIght of Way Permits are not mcluded.
!!!;!pani, Cyndi
From"
Sent:
To"
Cc:
Subject"
Owens, Reginald W
Tuesday, November 18,20031 25 PM
'nlckpavonette@beckgroup com'
Harrrger, Sandy, Campos, Geraldine, Arasteh, Mahshld, Akin, Pam, Tarapanl, Cyndl,
Simmons, Margie, Wilson, Denise A , Phillips, Sue, Matthews, Douglas E
Post Office
Nlck/Bnan
I had a meeting With the Manager of the downtown Post Office and we reviewed your draWings and site plan
The Manager Thomas Legare (727) 441-3693 (United States Postal Service, 650 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL
33755) seems very Willing to cooperate In terms of moving some of hiS mall vans now lYing adjacent to the east
boundary line of the project site when you commence construction It seems he could relocate some of hiS on-site
employee parking off-site, and use these spaces for the vans (he needs a formal request letter from Beck)
However, he Will need some help from Beck to achieve thiS - namely, my suggestion IS that Beck contact the Bank of
Amenca In downtown, and see IS they would be open to allOWing temporary Post Office staff parking on that portion of
their dnve In faCIlity which they do not currently use
Secondly, In light of the fact that It IS your deSire to have Post Office traffiC, those who use the parkmg structure, to eXit
through the garage and go by the retail, we are effectively creating a dead space In the adjOIning space between the two
bUildings The Post Office IS 0 K With thiS, but agree With our pOSition that Beck should assume the responsibility of
landscaping thiS future "dead" space ThiS IS gOing to be a very deep dead end alley - our suggestion IS that you make
thiS alley part of your current site plan, and make prOVIsions for a combination hardscapellandscape plaza (extension of
our streetscape), which would extend to a decorative wall "half-way down the alley - the balance of the alley (north) could
then just extend mto the rear parking lot of the P 0
Please note, you Will also have to contact the newspaper vendors (machines), so they can be relocated dunng
construction - upon completion, they could go back Into the new "plaza" area, perhaps abutting the Side wall of your
bUilding out of the way
Please contact Mr Legare, and obtain from him what you need - he should be very cooperative He has your names
am sending him a hard copy of thiS communication
Bnan, we are researching the actual ownership of the northern portion of the red bnck wall, et ai, which abuts Station
Square Park I am qUite sure that that portion of the wail/landscaping IS owned by Clearwater Tower If so, you Will need
to contact them to coordinate your construction staging, etc
Thanks
1
Tarapani, Cyndi
1'<1 "t;l,:"
From:
Sent.
To:
Cc
Subject:
Tarapam, Cyndl
Thursday, November 06, 20034 11 PM
Phillips, Sue, Hamger, Sandy, Akin, Pam, Owens, Reginald W , Fierce, Lisa
Clayton, Gina, Dewitt, Gina, Gerlock, Frank
Beck Development Agreement
Please find attached a draft of the retalllanguage for the Beck development agreement Lisa Will be attendmg the
QRT for Plannmg on Monday If you all feel appropnate, please share thiS draft With Beck representatives I thmk
it captures the cnticalissues that we have been dtscussmg With them Thanks
~
Beck retail
anguage for DA do
Cyndl Tarapam
Plannmg Director
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
1
LANGUAGE FOR BECK RETAIL
TO BE INSERTED INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(S)
1 Allowable retail uses The developer has committed to the development of retail
and restaurant uses on the first floor of the project m partIal fulfillment of the
requIrements to obtam additional resIdentIal umts pursuant to the PublIc AmemtIes
DensIty Pool of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Therefore, for the
purposes oftlus project, "allowable retaIl uses" are defined as and lumted to the
followmg
· RetaIl establIshment that sells or leases goods dIrectly to the consumer, I.e., book
store, gIft shop, antIque store, flonst, clothmg store, VIdeo store
. Art Gallery
. Gourmet grocery store, WIth accessory sales of alcoholIc beverages The gourmet
grocery story may also mclude prepared food for off SIte consumptIon
· Restaurant WIth accessory sales of alcoholIc beverages
. SIdewalk cafe as accessory to the prmcIpal retaIl use
2 Prohibited Uses. The followmg uses are prohibited from locatIon WIthm the
project due to theIr mcompatIbIlity WIth both the reSIdentIal nature of the project and WIth
the goals, objectIves and polICIes of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan
. All uses prolubIted by the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan
· All other retaIl uses not speCIfically IdentIfied above, pursuant to the Commumty
Development Code's definItIon of retaIl sales and servIces
. N Ightclub/Bar
· AlcoholIc Beverage Package Store
. Medical or Vetermary offices
· Any other use determmed by the Commumty Development Coordmator not to
share the charactenstIcs of "allowable retaIl uses"
3 Timing/Alternate Uses. The developer shall actIvely market and use lus best
efforts to obtam tenants for the fIrst floor retatl space as one or more ofthe allowable
retaIl uses descnbed above. However, should the developer be unable to obtam an
allowable retaIl use WIthm one year of Issuance of the temporary CertIficate of
Occupancy for the retaIl space, the CIty may allow, upon WrItten request ofthe
developer, one or more of the followmg alternate uses to occupy the first floor retail
space
. TaIlor or seamstress
. Dry cleaners
. FmancIaI InstItution
. Busmess Office-but not medIcal or vetermary office
Whenever an alternate use tenant vacates the retall space, the developer shall use his best
efforts to re-estabhsh the retaIl space wIth an allowable use as defined m paragraph 1
above
CHT / November 6, 2003
_ W/;hA ~~O.
~ J1Ja<<
""-~
vailable
~~. Best CORV
Available
t-
:~ - fjh~ ~?J-~
?/!!-p~ h CJijg/T IU#-~
~~
,h' ~/tJa~~J"Y~
.t!t!l2tfo. ~ 1t2 ~k
~~~~ .
-~ ~~
- -
b)LL~r~ ~/?bt/
1:P-;2I~)1J gul>>n;SE~/p~~~
~1;1g t:J7 j'7JZJ)(. t:?c? ~~~ ~
~~ -ftJ!P~
gJ11pj- ~ - 4JU1/~q;
~~~/. .;. ~~(.,;~ dh r~
_ 10 ~ ~-t-I7t2lt2if- ~
. ~~~ - ~t1/tfJlfl;7J~~~
~1:;~ - {A/d-&::J-~
:.Ii> ~ A~-,it& ~/Jtdaa
M1JtdtfW]ll~
~.-O/NI- ?
------'" /
~-
jJJ?j;2~
,
17;:; 10" ~
----
etJ- ,
~A::<
>
>
-1f!!M-~ ~
jl2.-Bt~
~m~
~? ~(Jf WI
17'N- ~ te./7fU4:7 ..~~~
/ -- /7_~d;(~ -/J~~hl?() - 12i2u:h?~~~P;Q~
l/.; ~~-~~-OtfJ?~~'"
-
/ M~I<< ~ // hJ~ ~ ~ c:?~
/ ~;~Ifh~ 7L-
I
&;7771 CJY' >,?O 7 ~
~ A.~:~'/tr~~~,/o~~
~
I1Nd .- ?' ~~/oZ?4tJd~~
- ~If- (J7J- ~rlJ--~~ab7'/h'-0/~
eest C-oP'l
~"a"ab\e
~/{)1&j?
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone 727-562.4567
Fax 727.562-4865
CA ~
DATE: RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY (staff Initials)
ATLAS PAGE #
ZONING DISTRICT
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
~ Clearwater
-~
()~
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 13 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION Including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ , Z-oS"
.f: NOTE 14 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Jnfill Redevelopment Project (ReVised 06/23/2003)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use addlllonal sheets as necessary
APPLICANT NAME
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION' (Section 4-202 A)
~A-i'tJ~ ~vIJrfle L-.l-L-
,
MAILING ADDRESS b5~ (.J..Ev~~ ~..,..
E-MAIL ADDREssfa.lCot.S!4.rlO@.()..O{. (..eHv\
{
77-7. t; '12... . 4,/&05
C,fl.A.. ~~ Lfo l.=rb .
(
(Must Include ALL owners)
6v,r e -S 10 ( J...E:Are. ~P, ~L..
PHONE NUMBER 72.. 7. '('It;. 141~
FAX NUMBER I z.. 7 . '1l(~. CfItf)O
33; :ss
CELL NUMBER
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
'Ba,,- De.~IV\~ L-1--L
I
MAILING ADDRESS 5100 ~. ~'WV'fby 'B&Ai'b. bv,TE. 2.S1 T ~'P4 FL
E-MAIL ADDRESS br"Cltt\M,J~pl-y@ b(~~r~. elM PHONE NUMBER ~/3. s~7' ~33b
CELL NUMBER ctJ~. q/ct. '1-'?::.D~ FAX NUMBER 'l,/~. U~. ~/'tJ~
AGENT NAME(S)
33botj
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
STREET ADDRESS of subject site
FL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A1TN:..fI€ D ~vev~y
(If not listed here please note the location of thiS document In the submittal)
~€~ "l-1T"AU~ b
PARCEL NUMBER
PARCEL SIZE
· tif7 Aut...~ ,
(acres square feet)
1'1'
L(2 I 3~5
.
6F
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE
LD~'I\//i/M 1I1VITS 1~(7VV ~t:"
, ,
B (number of dweJlin~ Units holel rooms or square footage of nonresldenllal use)
__~I2.'LIIVI~ ~ ~~.F-b
&-~T4~ leer..,
A^,~ 32./
DESCRIPTION OF REOUEST(S) ~E~lfY J::.tv~~ HJi.. RESlb&.lf7A-L.. {J^",/~.
(Include all requested code deViations e g reduclion In reqUired number of parking space;, specIfic use elc)
NlJM~f,g. (1F f'.€TPr\L- ~Nb 6P4C-€S
t.APrv~
FoR..
Page 1 of 7 - FleXible Development Applicalion - ComprehenSive Inhll Redevelopment Pro)ect- City of Clearwater
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE rr 'SFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PRI"" '')USL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPF 0 (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ 'yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C PROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Section 4-202 A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 3-913 A)
o Provide complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain ~ each cntena IS achieved, In detail
2
11-l.
4
A....~
Pr"A
3 The proposed development Will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons resldln
use " (
r (.. ...
~" rl.~ rt-~~~""'~/- ~.
- '. \ _ (Y:, .1..\..
wY'1^'''^f"t-. ~'C '~'J~'t""'^
a..l~ (J t.r-~-' ~,,&__fJ:u,eJ .
5 The proposed development IS consistent with the community character of the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development
;tj;:i~~~"~~~;,, t;</tl;/'t~~~;1li- ~;u. ~ ~v~.t,
6 The deSign of the proposed development minimiZeS adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts.
on adJ~t propertle~ -. ,,~ A fI 1 ldJ t - ,{, J , J J~ - .. I ~ It
--=--l--b~ ~f...,v"L_!!f-t'l-t..n.t: f(" U/~AIO L h/lf:b !2X I"e..S ,i:t~~
OI~ ~A)M~t.I.t-,~f v~(.~. tI ~€ IAlbA, IU' V~ft,v'1H d~v~l6 IIVI'1j taL
M.14_!L Fr~ ~vra.. s\-ruA-.
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each cntena IS achieved In detail
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development IS otherwise Impractical without deviations from the use intensity
and development standards
L
~ ltv' ,~ t- ,"-o-l'\~
t/' AC-r(.
:J.p~-"f- ~ ~ ~ ,pA/"~ I
FrHl'- ~,\ ~~.
Page 2 of 7 - FleXible Development Application ComprehenSive Inlill Redevelopment ProJsct- City of Clearwater
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive mflll redevelopment project or residential mflll project will not
reduce the fair market value of abuttmg properties (Include the eXlstmg value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
Improvements 1n 1 I jl J..L.l\. l d I . /l If P .. ~ .1
:J I'{, tU'.llt.- ~ ": ......-..-r~r<!- f'6 1\ 0" i .err,.~ Ul:~1 I r", J :-
~P\t't-t ~ ",,JJIA ,,, tk t:trlA. It:,~ e.v~~ ~",.~ rr~f::t v--.lvt.. 'J
Qff{O~i ~t"lv'l> I., M;U~ ew.J fk. DrdP'5eJ V....( ..It.. v-t-f..- '',...,..ft''''~rob is 'Y"""" ~W)'P' I
iwl\ I~^. ., r
3 The uses within the comprehenSive Inflll redevelopment project are otherwise permitted In the City of Clearwater
,~ VS(,~ k.~;" I-h r~,'l/l..../-'.....I ,rI: II pr"J tJ ClI"t. f)/t,/",.,.'S~ ftr,...il/eJ
,,~~;rQ.bll. ~^. -kk. 6J-y *' c,[ ~~~/'.
4 The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses
----=a\'~ pr O)4f ;Os c'~~t. -,;~ cJj"'-f.-\f 'A,j v4e<, a".J rs 1r'1c,_~
---1-. ~.1 ~ t "'~M..", iry . Tk.-f f. j <J ",,"ilf ('-"fl."",,~ fh Ad~~1-
---kcJ. V'.,d. Ci~ OI"Ov;-d(. Ad4if,c,^ r tStA ....rN\J.. ,..Ai r,j.,.!/ ~e~t.
,... I
5 SUitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses wlthm the comprehensive Inflll redevelopment prOject are not
otherwise available In the CIty of Clearwater
1k &Ut.-~ ~ ~lJlr~f-( w-;[~,,,,-Jt. ~ vf,r,J1 ~ ~:
ih\M.uJ_!~h. \li"ci'I'I;~rt1"':-& ''') h~l~ tIl~ ~L/V1ce.~ c/P ~k. U;N'fMWI:7'"
6 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive mflll redevelopment project will upgrade the Immediate VIcinity
of the parcel proposed for development
?~~~~~~g~;~ ~U~:;':C:~fk ~ p;:/Jt:!;:-,'jJ.-~~ ~
7 The deSign of the proposed comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the Immediate VICinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
~ ~~-"Jof~~t ",,;/L.hlAC.J.rf. fN.. {Vrfvf- r(4~V(/(Jp"'^i~f
(? p ~ DirLA..
8 FleXibility In regard to lot wIdth, required setbacks, height and off.street parking are Juslifled by the benefIts to community character and the
Immediate VIcinity of the parcel propos d for development and the City of Clearwater as, a whole
.. , . e.. \ . v^, e:\ Iv" ~ &'; /, ...r~1-
~~~t.- -toO d(),-,^+--.,,,, LI'--" ~r_ T"! p~p~ J
J~",JdO~~ f\l'-p-'aS ~,~.....:-P,'~_.J.. ~..JzW~~ Yo #. j.tJ~v~,.,..t-l- eJ~
~~(\ CJ(.;~~t,..
9 Adequate off~slreet parking In the Immediate VICinity according to the shared parking formula In DIVISIon 14 of Article 3 will be available to
aVOid on-street parking In the Immediate VICinity of parcel proposed for development
~L. ~rDj{ct ,ttJvJts.
ffJO
P vlol.'e p",.ft,'j ~~S.
10 The deSign of all bUildings complies With the Tounst Dlstnct or Downtown Dlstnct deSign gUidelines In DIVISion 5 of Article 3 (as applicable)
Use separate sheets as necessary
~E. A 1t~l{a
Page 3 of 7 - FleXible Development Application - Comprehensive Intlll Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
E SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL
~UIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (Including legal descnptlon of property) - One onglnal and 12 copies,
o TREE SURVEY (Including eXisting trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including dnp lines and Indicating trees to be removed),
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY,
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request to make deViations to the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Pnor to
the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be In
accordance with accepted traffic englneenng principles The findings of the study will be used In determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved,
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable,
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note BUilding permits will not be Issued until eVidence of recording a final plat IS provided),
o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable,
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A)
o SITE PLAN With the following Information (not to exceed 24" x 36")
All dimenSions,
North arrow,
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared,
Location map,
Index sheet referenCing IndiVidual sheets Included In package,
Footpnnt and size of all EXISTING bUildings and structures,
Footpnnt and size of all PROPOSED bUildings and structures,
All reqUired setbacks,
All eXisting and proposed pomts of access,
All reqUired Sight tnangles,
IdentificatIOn of environmentally umque areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, Including descnptlon and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and Wildlife habitats, etc,
Location of all public and pnvate easements,
Location of all street rights-of-way Within and adjacent to the Site,
Location of eXIsting public and private utilities, Including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines,
All parking spaces, dnveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces,
Depiction by shadmg or crosshatching of all reqUired parking lot Intenor landscaped areas,
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical equipment and all reqUired screening (per
Section 3-201(0)(1) and Index #701},
Location of all landscape matenal.
Location of all Junsdlctlonal lines adjacent to wetlands,
Location of all onslte and off site storm-water management facllilles,
Location of all outdoor lighting fll<tures, and
Location of all eXisting and proposed Sidewalks
o SITE DATA TABLE for eXlstmg, reqUired, and proposed development, In wntten/tabular form
Land area In square feet and acres,
Number of EXISTING dwelling Units,
Number of PROPOSED dwelling Units,
Gross floor area devoted to each use,
Parking spaces total number, presented In tabular form With the number of reqUired spaces,
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed In square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area,
Size and species of all landscape matenal,
OffiCial records book and page numbers of all eXisting utility easement,
BUilding and structure heights,
Impermeable surface ratio (I S R ), and
Floor area ratio (F A R ) for all nonreSidential uses
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendenng If pOSSible
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, prOVide the follOWing additional Information on site plan
One-foot contours or spot elevations on Site,
Offslte elevations If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel,
All open space areas,
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms
Lot lines and bUilding lines (dimensioned),
Streets and dnves (dimensioned),
BUilding and structural setbacks (dimensioned),
Structural overhangs,
Tree Inventory, prepared by a "certified arbonst", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting Size, canopy (dnp lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 _ FleXible Development Application ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment PrOJect- City of Clearwatel
G LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-1102 A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN
All eXisting and proposed structures,
Names of abutting streets,
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations,
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers,
Sight vIsibility triangles,
DelineatIon and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping Islands and curbing,
Proposed and required parking spaces,
EXisting trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the site, by speCies, size and locations, Including drlpllne (as Indicated on
reqUired tree survey),
Location, Size, description, speCifications and quantities of all eXisting and proposed landscape materials, Including botanical and
common names,
TYPical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including Instructions, SOil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures,
Intenor landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Intenor landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and
percentage covered,
Conditions of a prevIous development approval (e g conditions Imposed by the Community Development Board),
Irrigation notes
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendering If pOSSible)
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM applicatIOn, as applicable
H STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (CIty of Clearwater DesIgn Cntena Manual and
4-202 A.21)
o STORMW A TER PLAN including the follOWing requirements
EXisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines,
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures,
All adjacent streets and mUniCipal storm systems,
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure,
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality,
Signature of Flonda registered ProfeSSIonal Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval IS reqUired pnor to Issuance of City BUilding Permit), If applicable
o COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A.23)
Required In the event the application Includes a development where design standards are In Issue (e g Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment Project or a Resldentlallnflll PrOject
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings Including height dimenSions, colors and materials
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of bUilding With colors and matenals to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (black and white and color rendenng, If
pOSSible) as reqUired
J SIGNAGE (DIVISIon 19 SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached Signs, PrOVide photographs and dimenSions (area, height, etc ), Indicate whether they Will be removed or
to remain
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached Signs, PrOVide details including location, Size, height, colors, matenals and drawing
o ComprehenSive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee reqUired)
o Reduced Slgnage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (calor), If submitting ComprehenSive Sign Program application
Page 5 of 7 _ FleXible Development Application. ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. (Section 4-202 A 13 and 4-801 C)
o Include as required If proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted In the Comprehensive Plan
Tnp generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Tnp General Manual Refer to Seclion 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement
L. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made In this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authonze City representatives to VISit and photograph the property
described In this application
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscnbed before me this _ day of
A D 20_ to me and/or by
, who IS personally known has
produced as
Identification
Signature of property owner or representative
Notary public,
My commiSSion expires
Page 6 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT'
(Names of all property owners)
1 That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location)
2 That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a (describe request)
3 That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition,
3 That this affidaVit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above descnbed property,
4 That the applicant acknowledges that all Impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc ) Will be paid PRIOR to the Issuance of a bUilding permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first,
S That site VISitS to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to VISit and photograph the property descnbed In this applicatIOn, .
6 That (lIwe) , the underSigned authonty, hereby certify that the foregOing IS true and correct
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the underSigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Flonda, on thiS day of
, personally appeared who having been fIrst duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidaVit that he/she Signed
My CommiSSion Expires
Notary Public
S IPlannmg OepartmentlAppl1catlon Forms\development revfew12003 FORMSlcomprehens/ve m"" applIcation 6-23-2003 doc
Page 7 of 7 - FleXible Development Appllcallon ComprehenSive Inflll Redevelopment ProJect- City of Clearwater
Tarapani, Cyndi
From:
Sent.
To.
Subject.
Akm,Pam
Tuesday, October 14, 2003 5 05 PM
Dewitt, Gma, Tarapam, Cyndl
RE Phone message
Yes 1 week?
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: DeWItt, Gina
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003334 PM
To: Akm, Pam
Subject: Phone message
Cyndl T. Just wanted to get some clarification regarding the retail language on Beck She
wants to verify that she IS supposed to be writing It and get a time frame from you. Her # IS
4547
Gina DeWitt
Administrative Support Manager
Clearwater City Attorney's Office
727 -562-4011
gdewltt@c1earwater-fl com
1
J/lJ/r~CW,It:J "
'9;mm6W 'IJ1~~
~
7'~
. - Mfi1M~~/;1J-g4ttl/j3.m~-4fd-
~PU?
0#1- ~ lW ~~ /J1U/h~!fJ::- ~ bO/1J1>>~
)0 A/?; ~ 6fl
a lJau /tY c:1;:P/~~~ q;~~
- t%h7 ~~b~~ il ;zr --'r:
~(f; /tJ~~ ~:/
- ~.. 7:0" ~~_~ - .
*iJ~
81~II8AY
~o~ JS88
-
.
U:~4a?
) ~~
~<:..
:::::;;.--
- ~~~~/~~
tfY~~~: -7Vn~~
- ~ ~Z
~:Me~; /J~.I!ta&- ~;t.~~.6
~~~1fl1/~~~_
~ i/.Ih~
, t '
tJJJ1-
Offf:
t cop'l
Ava\\3 \e
'4I:tt5} /ht 1h'~ IZ~.
~ ~//dt1Y~k$-
-
-
--
. t2l1..'57".k,~-- Be8t-C.oP.Y
j,..e~ _ P a @.h!. ~ Available
~ '?liKe ew- a/G
- ~~~h/~
'O-L b~.- htJUe Idt:>)?~ 0' ~l?~ ~
~
STATION SQUARE DEVELOPMENT
Determination of Impact Fees
~. ~.If'!?
Permit Plan Development Transportation Sewer Sewer Sewer Water Water Water State **c.o. **C.O.
Review Shops Rest. Condos Shops Rest. Condos Surcharge Condos Comm'l
$45,850 43,300 36,000 120,816* 4,500 4,500 126,000 2,400 2,400 67,000 2,373 1,540 156
Water.=. 5 retaIl spaces wI 5/8" water meters @ $480 = $ 2,400
Restaurant wI 1.5" meter = 2,400
Condominiums 140 @ $480 = 67,200
Sewer: 5 retail spaces @ $900
Restaurant wI 1.5" meter
Condominiums 140 @ $900
= 4,500
= 4,500
=126,000
* including credit of $10,030
** residential CO's = $11.00 each
comm'l CO's = $26.00
'1!i1/ U/ltU( ~J1?f,
Note -&ormwater buy-m quotea Beck 10/13/03 by Bnan Barker x4779
UtIlIty ConnectIOn/Tap fees pendmg addItIonal mformatIon
I Total Impact Fees: $456,8351
Permit:
Plan Review:
Transportation:
~CQfllm:
~h~ State Surcharl!e:
DEVELOPMENTSU~ARY
Square Footage:
Retail 15,000
Residential 184,800
Common Area 37,450
Total 237,340
Residential Units 140
Value $25,000,000
nevelonmpnt.
$4,600 + $1.65 per $1,000 of value or fraction = $ 45,850
$2,050 + $1.65 per $1,000 of value or fraction =$ 43,300
Condos 40 units @ $794 =$111,160
Retail $1,700 per 1000 sq ft x 4840 sq ft = 8,228
Rest. $2,491 per 1,000 sq ft x 4600 sq ft = 11.458
$ 120,816
Ea~k 2,599 ~q l't or ftaction thereof @ $250 - $ 3(1,099 ~
237,340 sq ft @ 1 cent per sq ft
= $
2,373
Miscellaneous Fees -
Alarms
Gates/Fences
Sign
Clearing/Grub
Tree Permit
Trailer
Power Pole
Fire Sprinkler
Lawn Meter
CDB Approval
Com reh nsive Sl n Pro ram
AJVI/tI !Jj,O I r;4a. '/J~
. The fees shown on this document are based on the information provided to us regarding the~roposed project located at Station Square.
These fees are subject to chan e based on the information at hand and are to be used only as an estimate.
. Reinspection Fees are the responsibility of the contractor or developer.
. Fees associated with Plan Amendments are not included.
.1;1I11:::..aSSOciated with Right of Way Permits are not inclnded.
Based on Project Value
Based on Project Value
Based on Project Value
$ 10.00
$3 per tree min $ 15
1 @ $155.00
_ @ 37.00
Based on Project Value
-L $ 75.00
$ 1205.00
$ 300.00
~'ltJd1-~
,
y
.!!!!.pani, Cyndi
Cc:
Subject:
Stone, Ralph
Thursday, October 09,2003935 AM
Akin, Pam, Owens, Reginald W , Campos, Geraldine, Arasteh, Mahshld, QUillen, Michael,
Tarapam, Cyndl
Wilson, Demse A , Phillips, Sue
Station Sq Development
From:
Sent'
To:
The following Items were discussed yesterday With the Beck Co reps which Included NiCk, Bnan (arch) and DaVid
Polatty (attorn), In attendance for the city were myself, Reg, Cyndl T , Lisa Fierce, the meeting was requested by Beck to
confirm direction on the deSIgn Issues and diSCUSS several dev agree Issues, the folloWing was discussed
1 General consensus re the deSign of front elevation, the west side Will require better treatment of the parking garage
levels and thiS treatment Will be duplicated or better on the north and east sides, we do not want the north side to present
Itself to Laura St as a " service Side" All agreed to thiS
2 DaVid to get With Pam re the alternatives for transfer of the land, hopefully wout haVing to prOVide cash transfer since
thiS Will Circle back In the deal, diSCUSSion re the alternative of uSing a letter of credit
3 Bnef diSCUSSion re scheduling, Beck indicates 6 months for deSign and 15 months for construction They may nsk
developing construction doc preparation dunng the time the development agreemenUslte plan are being approved, we
stressed that thiS would be at their nsk, but we would be Willing to concurrently conduct construction plan reviews If they
want to start as soon after approval as pOSSIble
4 Reg/Gen Will refine the vanous fees for the meeting next Tuesday including storm water payment In lieu, tree
replacement and parks/rec If any
5 We need to decide If we want to cap the parking space cost at $12,500 Nick proposed thiS With the caveat that the
developer would be responsible for any overage, but would also benefit from any saVings, we need to deCide If we want
to go the cap route or agree to the "bid" cost, whatever that might be Pam/Mahsld/Mlke-please adVise whether you think
we need to engage an owners rep for our 100 spaces and any maintenance/operation/liability language we might need In
the 0 A
6 Pam-we need your direction on whether the 0 A Will go to the COB or Just the CRA and whether we Will need an
Interlocal agreement between the city and CRA, DaVid indicated It was hiS understanding from diSCUSSions With you that
you are drafting first cut of the 0 A
7 Some diSCUSSion re limitations on alternative uses of the retail/restaurant spaces should they not be marketable after
a reasonable penod of time
Next meeting next Tues at 8 30
1
t,~~/~t1~~
f(), ~ - _ , _ -~I2Il.
~~ IhpJ~tJO)j~:htf}!/d~tW~-
$bR 1?t!!J-ft' /~ c::rm;ur/2-~ 1//7 ~
'._ _ ilt1l/22Io(;;?J$ /p~~~~~ .
--I ~ }1J (/ 117 >>J2!!17am& /M)1~Idmz.
M' PlV/ ~ ~~~- &/'/ll/,UY&->>f-
aI1JJnl1v~~ ~~ --tt! {lg:.
&-m L?J71o~ ~hUh~ tR/*' -" /tt>>Jf ~/&
i_~:
__ _ ' r/IIm - h~ #hiUJ ~t?!6- - ~~~
~/JUl2f1;y~iit &Jet;. Iq
CV?u?y, t>> 0R4- h6~~
v?~.m~.ft~~
~ flu ~ ~'M'-I'-Y~ ~}/J# t:JJ1
/;JlJ)1J ~ (?2 .ek~,:J)~
tJ111-' ~~/t)phve //}?;?.~-~~. w~~
!Z6- ~~)-)t;~/iJp ~~~
&t ~A:r/2-&/V~;Z f/~
~ /::7c,~ ~~k
;2g h ~ /J1Lt Best Copy
Available
~ Ctflw~J;, -~~ ~4f- ~
M ~dLd ~
-f ./Udtu!e. ~~ ~ It> ~ ~-IIfIt-P4c-
a k M!:;2 ~tf& ~ ,,(J~ ~/;<e~
'\
Ij
.
.
PJ. ~~. ~~~~/F
t1j pr tJt?M lu#7~
~jJ ~~/J1I;?2It) IP~ -- /r~~
fttfL / ~ U-;p ~ Oo/P'//p-
/D#U~ a:r/3
//1 Vt:1t:e ~~ ~~~
t>>J /~~ ~~ /'7tJl/U:;J C7J?
*-
~
Best Copy
A"ailable
.
;go
t?//tJU/1/~
t;-
_L(}.f/- ~
_~~A ~ ~mt!#~~"t~- 11:
_rev-
t- 1o~~4~~t::;
-f6:~ ~~ -~ ~
~ ~/M~~ ~~~-41;jt5)-
IIf ~15 ?11a /~~A~
tJflr #JE&fm)~t~-
---~
j-- -
---
__,,//1.- ~I/~
V
/ r:5- ~1o~#1Iue~ 7/~/t;
~-~~~JF
:,
I '
,
.
~t coPY
A vailatile
I
L
f
I
I
1
~JJrM-
)ktt jOr~ tP;
YflJ#
Vtll 0 rJr (J.O-
pj 1 Water Fee - $115,200
- $480 per umt = $67,200
- $48,000 for 6" pump
!!!!pact Fees for Station Square Development
~d c5h l'jbtpn~
2 Sewer Fee - $216,000
- $900 per umt = $126,000
- $90,000 for 6" pump
f~1
~
Plans ExammatiOn Fee - $36,390
- $1,890 (greater than $1,000,000 of value) + $1 50 per $1,000 of value ($34,500)
4 BUI1dmg PermIt Fee - $38,630
- $4,130 (greater than $1,000,000 of value) + $1 50 per $1,000 of value ($34,500)
5 TransportatiOn Fee - $128,160 ~tfi;Y ~t:I/t(J 6/11' #
- $794 per umt = $111,160
- $1,700 per 1,000 Sq Ft = $17,000
6 Development Fee - $36,000
- $250 per umt = $35,000
- $250 per 2,500 Sq Ft = $1,000
Impact Fee Total = $570,380
"'Possible Parks and Recreation Fee (I will know by Wednesday)
.tUJtt /IJ, 9i~?
Owens, Reginald W.
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Mahony, Thomas
Thursday, September 25, 2003 9 47 AM
Barrett, Earl
Owens, Reginald W
RE Station Sq
/t?~ '5J ~
The areas c ulated from the cad flle~
6485 0 lot 11 block 19 lJH6
,365 riots 4-11 and the west 2 feet ~ !1f;1&tJ 8J CJ;fj jJIJJhPl16tfj-
If you want this on the sealed survey this will have to come from the surveyor who sign and sealed
them That might reqUire a small fee ThiS should have been conveyed to the person who ordered the
surveys to begin with
~// -~hO
....
Tom Mahony, P SM
PW A/Engineering
City of Clearwater
727-562-4762
-----Ongmal Message-----
From Barrett, Earl
Sent. Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12 33 PM
To: Mahony, Thomas
Ce' Owens, Regmald W
Subject FW Station Sq
Tom -
Can you prOVide these calculations for Reg?
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Owens, Reginald W
Sent. Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12 05 PM
To: Barrett, Earl
Subject. Station Sq
Earl
Could you please check with the engineers and see If they can provide us with a total square foot measurement for each
of the two surveys they did - shown on a sealed drawlng(s) would be preferable
Thanks
1
- .
~k~ .
/(J, t()~ V'q~
&J1.
~~/s-- .1'1-1 7F1U~
YU--jfJ~~ R?:r ~
- ~ dU7)11cr /fJa/-~
~ ~dL-du/7t ~
/o/~()~ ~/;~ .
,
-
t-Cop1
A "ai\ab\e
~ani, Cyndi
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, September 30,2003443 PM
Wilson, Denise A , Phillips, Sue, Akin, Pam, Harnger, Sandy
Arasteh, Mahshld, QUillen, Michael, Bertels, Paul, Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina, Gerlock,
Frank, Campos, Geraldine
Beck project review
Subject:
I Just wanted to let you know that we met WIth Bmn Murphy of Beck and Deruus Karr, Arclutect today and here
are some abbreVIated notes In attendance from the City were Mahslud, M1ke, Paul Bertels, usa, Frank, Gma and
Gen
We had a detatled dtscusslon about the items reqUlted for Site plan subnuttal-I will not hst them all but Just want to
lughhght two 18sues The estunated traffic from the project will hkely exceed 1000 tnps per day, therefore, a traffic
analysis will be reqUlted to be subnutted WIth the Site plan Paul explamed that the developer should meet WIth
Ben Elbo to get City approval of the traffic methodology, then do the study and subnut it WIth the Site plan As of
today, Beck has not lured a cwtl engmeer to do tlus analys18 nor the stormwater calculations.
Regardmg tree replacement, it was ldenttfied that all removed trees should be replaced mch for mch or payment
should be made mto the tree bank Smce the project will take down all trees on the Site and replacement 18 not
hkely based on the Site plan, tlus fee could be qillte large The fee is calculated at $48 per tree mch removed and
not replaced, fee 18 payable upon CO Thelt tree survey will identify the total number of tree mches to be
removed
We then had a detatled dtscusslon about the destgn They presented a reVlsed plan that we proVlded comments on
The major destgn issues dtscussed are
. the lack of a front door and substanttal entryway on Cleveland
· the need to ltllprove on the facade destgn to clearly demark a bwldmg base, nuddle floors and cap and to
mtroduce a destgn or destgn features that break up the extreme vertical onentation of the bwldmg Suggestions
to resolve tlus issue mclude creation of a more s.tgn1ficant entryway WIth arched features, add arches on the top
row of parkmg level, add destgn to top of bwldmg that s.tgn1fies the end of the bwldmg
· the new feature of a gnll m the nuddle of the bwldmg over the front area that 18 maSSlVe and UillllVlttng The
new gnll replaced a glass wall m tlus area on the preVlous destgn
· Matenals were dtscussed also and they understand the need to proVlde samples of matenals and pamt colors
dunng the destgn reVlew process
We all agreed that we would meet agam next Tuesday, October 6 at approXltllately 1030 or 11 am or unmedtately
after the QRT on the project Please let me know 1f you have any questions Thanks to all for attendmg
Cyndt Tarapant
Plannmg Dltector
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl com
1
4.1" --
_/1}; 1'ftJ -
1llJ-~
_1If -
~-
/n - ~+- ?j.?tJ~ ~... '
.4 HRl ~ /J. ~ / ~ sesl. vOr~-
(/ 7' #U07 ?:J- ~ Avaitable
In~' ~Wa ~~ !;~~ -~
~
, '
ff
q. t ~ ()::J
#tJd
Proposed Term Sheet for Station Square Development Agreement
Zonmg
Approval for 140 condo units, 15,000 SF of retail space and a 350 car
garage
Land Use.
Agreement conditioned on the County approving land use consistent
with the above zoning
Parkmg
The City wIll buy 100 parking spaces @ $12,500 each
Simultaneous Close. The City will allow us to close on the land by paYing With a $720,000
subordinated non-Interest bearing note repayable at the time the City
pays us for the parking spaces f1l' m~ tfk -
M)1-~;lJhM --~ 0)::..
TIFF The City & County will pay us a portion of the present value of the City
& County's share of the anticipated property taxes for the next 10
years based on the tax Increment created by the project This money
/2. will be used for landscaping and Infrastructure Improvements
(//1 /Iap5 dI /f? ~ ~ U$O/CY I~ -;- /n/M. /f1I~
Enterpnse Zone The City will help us secure from the State a sales tax credit on
construction materials used m the project and any other State or
Federal assistance that may be available
Fees
The City will either waive or pay for the following fees ~ ~
. Transportallon Impaelfees _ ~/H/;~
· Sewer Impact fees .,.- f/'I,a~~
· School Impact fees -)1I)M. $f~k)?CA.
---
. Water & sewer tap fees
. Fire line connection fees
Improvements
Plan review fees
BUilding permit fees
· Development fees. \ ~J' /h.,. ~
.It fJ//In ;tu/I~ ~/C. ~
City will reimburse us for utility and Infrastructure Improvements
required by any relevant JUriSdiction
0J7 or d]g 51'1e
W7t:1r#b~~ ?
t
'.
\ '--...
J1kcL q tti~
OPTION B
0*
219
219
282 _
63 (39 LESS)
II adtl / IJkJ?p
nOW Jiy J?/t
h6 ~ II:J~ 1-1-
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
USAG~
RETAIL AT STREET LEVEL
CONDOMINIUMS
COMMON AREA
15,000 SF
184,800 SF/146 UNITS 15098 DU/ACRE
37,540 SF
PARKING
RETAIL
CONDOMINIUMS I 5 PER UNIT
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED
PARKING PROVIDED
SURPLUS
OPTION A
0*
219
219
321
102
PROPERTY AREA 42,124 SF =
PROJECT AREA
FAR
APPROX BUILDING HEIGHT,
967 ACRES
215,500 SF
5 12
~
* PER AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
-aht:Jtd 1tJ-1Z ~ ;2#/7~
Station Square (Iearwater
2.5 Se!JlemJler 2003
I
.. ' '- L
A
.
2
LEVEL I SUMMARY
RETAIL
SMALL SHOPS
RESTAURANT
MEZZANINE
TOTAL RETAIL
4,840 SF
4,600 SF
5,560 SF
15,000 SF
s.,.
It~
~.,.
COMMON AREA
2, 180 SF
PARKING
35 SPACES
--- ---
ON-GRADE
PARKING
??~at"A:?
I
.
a..
::J
a..
L:
~
t
t
t
,
C J 1
,
RETAIL
STATION I 320 SF
SQUARE MECHI f
ELEC .
PARK 1
f
V f
I I
RESTAURANT RETAIL EXISTING
4600 SF 3520 SF POST OFFICE
I
Station Square Clearwater
t5 SeplecmbH t003
-,
~
..... ~ "r-'"" ~lL -'-_ 1 ___~_ ;.._
LEVEL 2 SUMMARY
3
COMMON AREA
640 SF
PARKING
71 SPACES
0-
::>
0-
L
~
z
o
0-
L
~
=i
1 =1-
CLEVELAND STREET
,
Station Square (Iearwater
2.5 SeplemllH 2003
,
~.. Q~ /~J
LEVELS 3-5 SUMMARY
~ --
,
4
COMMON AREA
PARKING LEVEL 3
PARKING LEVEL 4
PARKING LEVEL 5
a..
::J
a..
L
~
z
Cl
a..
L
~
CLEVELAND STREET
640 SF/LEVEL I ,920 SF
72 SPACES
72 SPACES
71 SPACES
POOL SPACE
ON LEVEL 5
Sf:alion Square (Iearwaler
2.5 September 2003
~> _ 1
::-. 5
LEVELS 6-11 SUMMARY
UNIT TYPE AREA # TOTAL AREA
A-I BR/I BA STUDIO 800 SF 36 28,800 SF
B-IBR/IBA WI DEN I,IOOSF 36 39,600 SF
C-2BR/2BA 1,300 SF 54 70,200 SF
TOTALS ~ 126 138,600 SF
COMMON AREA 4, 100 SF/LEVEL 24,600 SF
A
B C
C
A
A
C
A
A
C
B C
A
C
C
B
C
B
B
C
B
CLEVELAND STREET
Station Square [Iearwater
25 Seplemhu" 2003
P2
P4
"
P4
P2
, ~ -~ ...",\, - lIP 1!WYr?
-
6
PENTHOUSE LEVELS 12 & 14 SUMMARY
UNIT TYPE AREA # TOTAL AREA
PI 1,600 SF 4 6,400 SF
P2 2,400 SF 8 19,200 SF
P3 2,400 SF 4 9,600 SF
P4 2,750 SF 4 1/,000 SF
TOTALS 20 46,200 SF
COMMON AREA 4,100 SF/LEVEL 8,200 SF
P2
P3
PI
PI
P3
P2
CLEVELAND STREET
Station Square [Iearwater
25 septemher 2.003
,
Mecharucal
~---
Pemhouse
Umbo
ltuall2:
12U -
leval11
fia~
levt>>10
100--
living UOIts ,
Laval 9 ,~
90'
living Umts
l$ValB
-
Uvlng Unrts
Levell
7a
livIng Units
Uwl:l16
1i1--
Parking
lavelS
oa
patkll1g
l8\tel4
;m---
Parking
lavel3
3a
Parking
l~!!~___
20'
~etatl
Lwei 1
11--
c:?
la\fB114
13'
utve!l2:
ffiy- -
lOllal11
i1u-~ -
-,
t
\
L8Ifel10
i'ffi1- - -
"
"\
jl
';
level 9
00'
""'".
Iilt-
0_
l~&I7
111
'$-
l.uvel6
- -
Uvel5
511
""'''.
W---- -
'""""'3
30'
10\1&12
2(f-
levofl
lY-----
SECTION AT CLEVELAtill.~!!EET
OPTION A
.-....--
1lo:.Alt ~ ~ .
~
~~~1
j1t0/l/U
"
LlVlngUOIts ~\;
, \
Uvmg Units I ,\,~
V' \ i\
UVUlg Umts 't& \
~ '\
Living Un,ls l;j ,,\ ~
I: -d\
(~ltN : \
Uvmg Uruls \
\
\
\
Parking ,
\
\
Parking ("'.... \
..."",,~ \
Parking '~~J;
\"
\
Parking
?-
>>
4
Retail
I
SECTION AT CLEVELAND ~TREET
OPTIONB-
.-....--
tI..Wo ~.. t lI'
"
'-
.....
-
"'
,
-ft!f21l f1J ~IeL~~~
1, I~ ~3
-~j ~ &W-4z~iJK @!?/-
-~.
It) ttC /UtV d??7~ ~/-
I~n~-
l)IY!!J~ /~ ~, ?>/;~~ .
"--T~ -vlj{~ UU!.. ~- ~L2G.
IA ~~~~/o/tWc
{l;r #lQ/ Id/~ - t2J-~ ~/b~
~ ~ -J:2at4t ·
eest coPY
,..va\\ab\. .
'!!!!pani, Cyndi
From:
Sent:
To:
Ce.
Subject:
Arasteh, Mahshld
Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9 48 AM
Tarapant, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Clayton, Gina
QUillen, Michael
FW Station Square
FYI Thanks Mike
Mahshid D. Arasteh, P.E.
Public Works Administrator
100 S. Myrtle Ave. #220
Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone: (727)562 4757, Fax: (727)562-4755
----Original Message-----
From: QUillen, Michael
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4 18 PM
To: Arasteh, Mahshld
Sub)eCt:: Station Square
Stormwater
a Attenuatlon- We are requesting payment In lieu of providing on-site stormwater attenuation per Communtty
Development Code section 3-914 (A) This IS tYPically used as a development incentive when on-site attenuation would
be Impractical because of the size of the property or other site related conditions The payment amount IS not arbitrary, It
IS calculated by the developer's engineer based on what size pond would have been needed & the appraised property
value ThiS IS a perfect location to use It because the site does not lend Itself to a pond, but discharges to an undersized
storm sewer system We have plans to upgrade the system and these funds Will offset some of the cost of the upgrade
b Retentlon- retention requirements can be met by the use of 011/ grease separators on the discharge from the parking
garage
Traffic Polley IS to reqUire traffic studies on developments exceeding 100 tnps/hr or 1000 tnps/day It IS unknown what
the tnp generation from thiS project Will be until the non-residential uses are detailed Recogntzlng the bndge Will be
removing traffic from Cleveland St , we will work With the developer to determine the level of study needed
I will investigate to determine whether the above Items are reasonable to add to the site plan application form
1
I POJ/m~
. ~.1J'
~~..;n'
Be~t Copy
A val a e
a/
Z".~
~JJ-
a~
-
'l/~-
~- - 18)U; ~/Pi ~~-1PkI~
~~~}!i Iff7 ~ 10' /?~
1~~17
-~)) -
11~
10-
Y/;O'u - j1()1--- /~;t?ct' --
~I'
Best Co
Available
$, etrf
/'1
t
. .
Planmn~ Dep2
~nt Comments on Station Square IntI
. (}J4I..I'( crQh
o1ect - 9-16-03. ~'elJ C/Jdt..
Benefits
.
Restaurant and retall on fIrst floor
Ob1ectIve 1 F of People Goal- Cleveland Street shall be mamtamed as downtown's mam
street whIch IS valued both for ItS hlstonc character and scale of development and for ItS
functIOn as the major retail street
ProvIdes resIdential use
Dlstnct VlSlon Use - A key component of the downtown core IS to attract resIdential uses
vdliCUINWIth a vanety of housmg types and pnces
. Access on Laura Street only
PolIcy 7 of Downtown Core - To ensure a pedestnan-fnendly and safe enVIronment,
dnveways shall be dIscouraged on Cleveland Street between Myrtle and Osceola Avenues
Some pedestnan elements proVIded mcludmg corner balcomes that read as stepbacks, awnmgs at
human scale (and on thIrd floor), real wmdows and louvers m buffenng the garage opemngs, and
covered fIrst floor walk area
Some elements of contextual archItectural deSIgn are proVIded mcludmg details WIth honzontal
features, symmetncal deSIgn and neutral bUIldmg colorslbnghter accents
Access to bUIldmg/retaIl/restaurant proVIded on the fIrst floor (SImIlar to other bUIldmgs on Cleveland
Street) ~'CIr1 111 hJ~~ic..~
SWlmmmg pool for reSIdents proVIded
PolIcy 19 of overall Downtown Plan - ReSIdential development shall proVIde appropnate on
SIte recreatIOn facIlIties based on the scale of the project
.
.
.
.
.
Challenges
. ProVIde Improved relatIOnshIp to the Post OffIce and other hlstonc bUIldmgs m scale, matenals, etc
PolIcy 8 of Downtown Core - Redevelopment and new construction along Cleveland Street
shall be compatible WIth and contnbute to pedestnan VItalIty, human scale and hIstonc fabnc,
Downtown Core Dlstnct VlSlon (Development Patterns) - New constructIOn and
redevelopment along Cleveland Street must respect and be mtegrated wIth the eXIstmg
predommant hlstonc bUIldmg, heIght and scale patterns EstablIshed bUIldmg rhythms,
setbacks, and scale along the block should be mamtamed and remforced WIth new
constructIOn Proposed bUIldmgs m excess of the establIshed hlstonc heIght must be stepped
back from Cleveland Street so the addItional heIght mamtams a streetscape that preserves a
human scale
HeIght should stepback one foot for every two feet over predommant block heIght... ()I ~w.. affad1-ttt.
See PolIcv 8 and Downtown Core Dlstnct VISIOn above
ArchItecture IS very boxy m deSIgn (too mlmmalIstIc for context of Cleveland Street) - needs to
mclude a vanety of deSIgn elements
Amemty Goal. Ob1ectIve 3 D - Redevelopment IS encouraged to create a VIbrant downtown
enVIronment contammg a vanety of bUIldmg forms and styles that respect downtown's
character and hentage
DeSIgn needs progreSSIOn of dlstmctIve features WIth clearly noted bUIldmg base, mIddle floors and
bUIldmg cap/roof lme, need emphaSIS of "front door" along Cleveland Street, wmdow pattern should
be dIfferentiated, top center pIece IS out of context WIth overall deSIgn, further honzontal emphaSIS IS
needed
Amemty Goal. Ob1ectIve 3 D - Redevelopment IS encouraged to create a VIbrant downtown
enVIronment contammg a vanety ofbUIldmg forms and styles that respect downtown's
character and hentage
Concern regardmg VIabIlIty of retall space to near garage
.
.
.
.
S \Plannmg DepartmenfIDOWNTOWN PLAN IMPLEMENTATIOMStatlOn Square lnfill ProJecf\Planmng Department Comments on StatIOn Square lnfill
Project doc
,
I
(
· Relationships between new and existing buildings
shall be evident in the height and design.
· Stepping back the stories of buildings can reduce the
apparent scale of the building and establish a "base"
and a "top".
~)
o At the predominant heigtft of buildings on the block
the proposed building shall be stepped back a
distance equal to that predominant height.
· Additional stepbacks from that predominant height to
the maximum building are still being studied.
Sep 15 03 112: 42p
l' ~
\, > S e P I 5 I 0 0 3 I 0 1 5 4~1
BECK
AN STUDIO ARCHITECTS
813 387 2901
No 1903
D~'ELOPMENT SUMMARY
USACf
RETA 'l AT STREET LEVEL
CONI)C)HIN'UMS
COMI'1t'N AREA
~~~
RETAIL
CON[)()M'NIUHS
TOTAL ;lARKING REQUIRED
PARKI \11:2 PROVIDED
SURPL US
PROPf RTY AREA
PROjE:T AREA
FAR:
APPRC~ BUILDING HEIGHT-
IS.OOOS~
'71.4005 7142U~
29,1005
146 85 DU/6.CRE
I 5 PER UNIT
O.
213
213
337
124
42.124 SF =
967 ACRES
215,500 SF
~
* PER )\C REEMENT WITH THE CtlY OF CLEARWATER
I.~
. a r w a
.11
p.2
2/7
f1IVtJ- .
tj . JUIO?
1l~
\
"^'
~J
\
S~f 15 03 )2: 43p
SSP 15 100310154'1
BfCK
AN STUDIO ARCHITECTS
(~
l.I~-4
$.,.
II~
~.,.
n
flJ
ON-GRADE
PAAKlNG
I
,
J
J
I
RETAIL
1840 SF
I
J
I..
J :
I ,
I j
r ..-
r r
,
l~~R
DINlN :;
, I
X ]~
,
RESTAURANT
4760 SF
813 38'1 2901
No 1903
LEVEL I SU' 'MARY
RETAIL:
SMALL SHOPS
RESTAURANT
MEZZANINE
TOTAL RETAIL
COMMONARE,A
PARKING
=:=J
Q..
:>
d...
E
~
MEeHl
ELEC
RETAIL
1380 SF
RETAIL
2200 Sf
LOGGIA ti '"'
--fi--l1..11u1\-i____.! ..ft r
--"
... I
l~'- #~
CLEVELAND STltEET
I.;
Ion Square (I
I~ ,if)pl~mtlF,r ~oo~
I .
. .11
p.3
3/7
5. ~o SF
4. ,() SF
4, 'OSF
I! '00 SF
2, OSF
16 PACES
-- -
Sef 15 03 '12: 43p BP'K 81::1 38'7 2901 p.4
Sa p 15 003 10 164M JAN STUDIO ARCHITECTS No 1903 4/7
LEVEL 2 SUMMAI ty
CO~1MON AREA (,ID',F
PARKING 80 Sg. C
IJUB(IC ACCESS r
-"0 F/\RKING
DEG(
0-
:;)
~
z
C
a..
I:
~
Uill
C LEV E LAN 0 STilt E E T
1.1
earwa
.11
Sep 15 03 -12: 43p BECK
. Sep 15 003 10:16~H AN STUDIO ARCHITECTS
POOl SPACE
ON L~ELS-....
PUBLIC ACCESS
TO P~RKlNG
DeCK
- I
J
I
,
.
813 38'1 2901
LPf~LS 3.5 SUM" IARY
.
COl"IMON AREA
PARlCJNG LEVElJ
PARI<ING LEVEL 4
PARI<JNG LEVELS
Q..
::>
0-
1:
~
~
Q..
~
~
lLW
CLEVELAND STREET
..1
I
I
Ion Square (I
1) \t'Dll'lfiDCJ 20U~
arwat
I
.11
No 1903
p.5
5/7
J.J2('~FJ ;veL 3.360SF
74 Sf A:I
74 SFA:I
73 SF,6.':1
813 38'1 2901
44 BF"'l(
, Se,'p 15 03 '12: p
Sep.15 '003 IO'lEAM ~AN STUDIO ARCHITECTS
No 1903
LEVELS 6.14 SUHMAI tY
p.s
6/7
UNIT TYPs., t\B!A. Ii. TOTAL AREA:
A-IBR,lIElASTUDIO 800 SF 3{ 28,800 SF
B-IBR,lleA WIDEN I,ICOSF ){ 39,600 SF
C-2BRI2EA 1,3CO SF 5'" 70.200 Sf
TOTALS. 126 138,600 SF
COMMON AREA 2.04 ) SF/LEVEL 18360 SF
B
fOOL AND
ROOF GARDEN
AT LEVEL 6
BELOW
B
A
A
c
c
.....
/1,
]:j
1
C LEV E LAN D S T lit E E T
I.i
a r w a
.11
Se~ 15 03 '.I2:44p
;)ep 1:1 UUJ 10 17A1~
..1
BP'K
AN STUDIO ARCHITECTS
81 ~ 38'1 2901
No,1903
p.?
7/7
PENTHC)USE LEVELS 15-16 SUMtfJ\1 ,
UNIT lYPf::' ~~ t! TOTAL AREA
PI 1.60 ) SF 8 /2.800 SF
P2 2.401) SF- 1- 9,600 SF
P3 2.6011 SF 4 10.400 SF
TOTALS 16 t2.800 SF
COMMON,~ 2.04C SF/LEVEL ~ 080 SF
'I
P3
PI
PI
P2
P2
PI
PI
P3
CLEVELAND STRI:ET
,
o n s! qua r e (I e
I
!J ~ ~ t' n I e m tl "I ..: U 0 J
arwat
.,J
.
'!!!!pani, Cyndi
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Owens, Reginald W
Wednesday, September 10, 20031205 PM
Wilson, Denise A
Harnger, Sandy, Phillips, Sue, Arasteh, Mahshld, Akin, Pam, Tarapanl, Cyndl,
'mckpavonettl@beckgroup com', Simmons, Margie
Station Square
Bill
I wanted to convey to you a calli Just got from Beck ~ after the meeting they met With their Investment group and they
agreed that the west side of the bUilding could appear as a huge wall overlooking Station Square Park
Therefore, they decided to Instruct their architect to reonent the bUIlding by reducing the square footage of each
condominium floor plate and the pool deck, gOing up a couple of more floors which would allow them better "premium"
floors, and place the pool so It overlooked Station Square ThiS would allow them to "sef' back the bUilding also on the
west Side of the bUIlding, and present a retail face on Station Square Park, similar to their Cleveland Street face
Nick Pavonettl also asked me to convey hiS appreciation for your Involvement and Interest In thiS project
I mformed Nick of the Internal meettng next Tuesday, and he appreciated our qUick response as they do Intend to make
the October submittal date
Thanks
1
AGENDA
STATION SQUARE REDEVELOPMENT
QUICK RESPONSE TEAM MEETING
September 10, 2003
1. Presentation by Beck of proposed Project Site/Building
Design Requirements.
2. Site Plan/Building Design Issues to Address.
3. Public Works/Engineering Issues to Address (including
need for a Traffic Impact Analysis).
4. Development Agreement Issues/Schedule.
5. Project Submittal/Review/Approval Schedule.
~
~
-~
-$-
~
/3tJ - /;
1Lli -
1afL-
I \
OM /tU4~- ~m:*-L2i~
e.m;)c ~ -/&--?J:IeyO~7' ~i!!t?/-2aK:
#.1-4- Jo ~ m TP?P
J ~ ~--tlru~~,.LJ#'
:10 W&A .
~ ~
~HJCJOh1/JJ/6"~~~~)
~ ~~ S::~i~':
4t)~- J!:f:-~ ~~~
u<< ~ /D~;(~v; - t:(//1:#-~//W6h7f1Ue
~-4Jcwh) ~ ~t#u~~~
12# ~i:Jw- /~I?'J?y'ih&,- -,I ~~
~~ ~:IOa:o
_ ~frL i/;.~ II -u-<< m~~
IlLUl I?w? ~-(yd~h> ~
Mna~Iv~r~
~Jo
~- · /JtWdcpmlJ!2!- ~MVY~.
/~- ~/-r-~' ~
tl-PJh~ ~. /J3U&
.
~--
Best Copy
A vailabte
-~-
- ~/h:t.&~/~
4/0--
/JlJJ -
//~dJ
/ /W/- -/Jtiy --/Vn U/)PC ?
,
~~
I
- lA, 1 )}~ - M ~
U~
l- ll) l21/UJ1t ~
fir . &L4dlJ Zff!!2
rvta;?Y JrJ i~-If)~ ~~
' jh
l1or-~ -hl~ 70~ L~l MH/~
----I:- Z ad# /ton/'d~ /i;Y P7~
~ if/iii1 - ~~
~ .
.
,
.
\ ,
".. .
, It
Be~t Copy
Available
..
Tarapani, Cyndi
From'
Sent,
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Owens, Regmald W
Wednesday, September 03,2003936 AM
'mckpavonettl@beckgroup com'
Hamger, Sandy, Phillips, Sue, Arasteh, Mahshld, QUillen, Michael, Tarapam, Cyndl,
Simmons, Margie, Akm, Pam, Wilson, Demse A , Matthews, Douglas E
FW Station Square/Beck Project
Importance,
High
Nick
Please be advised that soon after your conversation with Lisa Fierce from the City's Plannmg Department yesterday. the
City Manager, Bill Home, mstructed all staff to coord mate the Beck Station Square project through our QUIck Response
Team format that we previously discussed
NiCk, we will now proceed forward with a bl-monthly meetmg with Beck, addressmg all of the design and development
agreement Issues m a group meetmg with all relevant City Directors and Assistant City Managers present In thiS
fashion, we can all partiCipate rn the diSCUSSion, and Beck can obtam a clear consensus on all key elements from semor
management
In place of your meetmg with Planmng on September 10th, please be at City Hall on September 10th at 9 00 am with
representatives from your architects to discuss your design directIOn As per our conversation last week, please be
prepared also to present your position as It relates to Beck's need for a certam height, your proposed setback distance
from Cleveland Street (pedestnan scale), the rational for your density (# umts) request, and any other aspect of the
development which reqUires city staff concurrence
We would appreciate advance knowledge of any other aspect of the development which you might wish to have
discussed, so we can place It on the Agenda
We feel thiS format will expedite the process for both parties
All the best
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Home, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5 02 PM
To' Stone, Ralph, Brumback, Garry, Owens, Reginald W , Tarapanl, Cyndl, Arasteh, Mahshld, QUillen, Michael, Akin, Pam, Simmons,
Margie, Matthews, Douglas E
Subject: Station Square/Beck. Project
Importance' High
To QUick Response Team Members
In order to move the Station Square project forward as expeditiously as pOSSible, I want the QRT to schedule bl-monthly
meetrngs with the developers, I suggest a half hour of staff time pnor to a one hour meetmg If the QRT finds that more
time IS necessary With the developer that can be scheduled I am requestmg Ralph stone to "Chalf''' these meettngs and
at the conclUSion of each meetrng the QRT and the developer should establish an agenda for the next meetmg If either
the developer or a QRT member wants to add Items after the meetmg they need to coordrnate With Ralph
The first meetmg Will be September 10m the large CM conference room at 8 30 and the developer Will Jom the QRT at
am The agenda for the first meetmg Will be as follows
1 Public works/engmeenng Issues
2 Site Pian/DeSign Issues
3 Development Agreement Issues
4 Application Approvals and Schedules
1
'!'!!!pani, Cyndi
From.
Sent:
To.
Horne, Bill
Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5 02 PM
Stone, Ralph, Brumback, Garry, Owens, Reginald W , Tarapanl, Cyndl, Arasteh, Mahshld,
QUillen, Michael, Akin, Pam, Simmons, Margie, Matthews, Douglas E
Station Square/Beck Project
Subject.
Importance:
High
To QUick Response Team Members
In order to move the Station Square project forward as expeditiously as possible, I want the QRT to schedule bl-monthly
meetings With the developers, I suggest a half hour of staff time prior to a one hour meeting If the QRT finds that more
time IS necessary With the developer that can be scheduled I am requesting Ralph Stone to "Chair" these meetings and
at the conclusion of each meeting the QRT and the developer should establish an agenda for the next meeting If either
the developer or a QRT member wants to add Items after the meeting they need to coordinate With Ralph
The first meeting Will be September 10 In the large CM conference room at 8 30 and the developer Will JOin the QRT at
am The agenda for the first meeting Will be as follows
1 Public works/engineering Issues
2 Site Pian/Design Issues
3 Development Agreement Issues
4 Application Approvals and Schedules
Bill Horne"
1
/ML
8.u.o~ tm.t"~ ~~
6h1/JJ$ ~-/cy-e)trlP
~ WA1~-li1j/~prhmdbbJnk
/Vf1- q1 ~/t)~~ ~~~()t>> ~~~ ~ (/~
-Aid(" / If~~hJ~-~. 7-
IJJ~I~~~~~t7J<- /tJr/
-/(}tJ~P)~72-~ ~~a~ u#11)2...~/t5r4'/1 ~/c
~4M.lJtJ#?J~ --~~.
Zlt~ 10 ~ &!J:::-~~ :IL2~tD
p thh/;1P11h~
~ ~ - ~ 1/l1fhb etl1 ~/J~ UliLMt'4!iJ ?/7~
, 11l#1 ~tf.,_~p~
A)/4A ?tt;~
.~~n ~
I~:'" -: 1Jt!!J;- 112~ tJt;A 30 -4 ~;l1?c. J&
_1I/J1L
Best COJ!~
Available
1~'/J)\6~ ~~.. Gj~H l?f-\'(Gt-'\.~lu>If'M(f
~ , IN ~ (NPllA.".-~
, -
~0U- /~~- 1t17ff& - --_.~~~-- - NvuG ~ =~~-
__ _~.~ ~ . ~._.~_<ft.. -' ___ .'.
~@~~~~ - ~Best-Capy- -- ~-~
~~~=~ ~W~uilill~~~~~~~~~~Available~~~_~_~__~_==
-
rJJ?!unL~1~~-':~-_~ Lv~__i_~~~~
~ - -,,--=--~ "'"
!2 j~ f!!1itJJc~/+nI\S~ ~ q::_~J}fV~ t>L~~
f2-0 ~ t;f~ 10 fX~s~ !NCJE/07J~ -(f\{CuUf:>fAf&
-......~____-=-~ _ -"'~~oc::.....~-~~~~"""
_ __ t;JI41u~ {HP~~~ M1D ~_~=<;J!!?-~~_
__~_~~~==_ ___._~~f101If~~=.~~ = _~=___~_~~_~
~~~ ~~_ Gf2= fJY'f~_~ wi (}f~ ~ -~ ~~=-~~-~ -. u -~_
~~____~eA=_ .~_~~ f~~t%~~ Y~(jj~01&~tJlJC::{)~-<-_
~~=_= _ ~fq~ }~~~/WtWi /fJj[) 17~ 1J t:: ~D[<;L)J~~_
lA)V11t ~U-- (YTItfJL-__J__~__aJG~E.~~ __-_
__ ~11)J}17\r1to~~~I?-P~; t}fa:I:L~
~.~ _~~QLOJ?~ l/'J~()~ (N1V~;~~~
u&_O~W0 OJLf-0t~ ~cL.v uYP~ ~
~ ~ PI<<Jv1A1laJ oN 1 ~~ ."
c1UL uJlW..LA) IX _~ if ~~~ lIP t!!2~~ ~~_-
--?Jr!lJfi&:1-i 1NZ61Jl ~. ~_/)fJ ~ J_frJ:> f7Jq~__.
~!V-11S~~ '1% ~_~
!['Lv ~Wh1 ~=~(f2---~!!}!!b ftJIJJ!::(15~~Jf\J~~__~_r
utll V.IOllln..-- ~~_~~_~ fD ~. /1fw..JtfWI/!L-. _
~~ ~ _~~~~'P;f.JJ\0=~DL 70 /?b1J6f,lh~_,!==~_=~
~~ 111>10 }YJ?!j~~~Q ~__~~ · _W~~~~~~__
~~ flUjt!YJ11ur) J 'Mflk;r~fP~~;~1JL/~-- ~_.-,
_ c~f!i(G(W p ~~ I fcLH4J2 _= 10_ ~ ~j) ___~_~~~~~~__. _--
,~,~~-~ ~ ~~~~~J~fl1b!~~~
J
.-
BeC"~ Copy
_ __ _ _ _ ~ul."
- ~ ~-1Z1ziV:h - ~1 ~- - - it -
6fJ: " ~." " ." - uJ0. .~ l1 j
_ _ _ ~ __ __~ __ ~M7eJN flh<<" 11k1_~___f;C ~MfUJtft1J
_ _ ~ PULP~~~ _ __ _ ~ = = __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ <?;&r ftME, ~V~s(J!J__=_wl~ ~__htuY6 W- to
_ 1AlS ~_'f ~=~!tY ~_1l52" _~_ Q~~~tJl\/
~_ ~ ~~ .JL~ SIfMtI/IIt/l( .Pk- CNyT
DO; M lit%( ~ ~71+ (:ffJffJl.S
fffp;!ic_ ~~ ~~ _Tf)_ C1fe()~ t::fl-IJt1 (()M7e- ~ ~
__ KlAat ~~f5U1NG? ~ __ - -
__ ~5 qg;;Ji.IfffG _ ~[X) _jC{)v~ W2J)f I\JtJUJ ~-JO_~
~ 1ffM Nf~=~~ ~ 6\J (~ ~z;CJE or-=-
" ~_M%'j r::6~ W/()II'{ ~
_ fA vP CU!fzJ-f1- _ WJ1C> IS _17A6 Nf36(ffl~ ~(ctJlt)
.." 115) ~ rwr r:tt_"fU,~/fJ/j-) ~t\nY fI&d[J) to 7W/fI[AJ
_ ___ Nt5lJ)f[ 6N (~ /~ _ t ~_=~___ __
~~)_-~~ J;~PIt __ ___ _~_=___--_-
Bb-L It:_~ f0{ _P;/}f) _ P!Jl:>7JI2/Nj __~_~~ ~
AO ~ ~(J~~_I S1:LLL {)o('/r( ~ (;IMT_~0f IS)
WU)Jtr<b 1r::__-tsl) Itt6 ~b ~Y ~ ((/Jf/tf <A
~ MIrfLt/,!A~<~___(fl!f ~ Sl~r ~~ ~ L
~._ ~r::k ~~u(a~fj?VIf7]~bowJj FAtifIJ
(J ~ ~ #A('r\, r1,r, un __ _ _
__ - - ___ - -J~~J~fY ~'JVI"" J -~-__ _- _ - - -- - -- - -
__ ~ ~~ ~ ?U~ 1D f~ f1j NflLAjj €Ai 4tY 10 feLL
_ __ ~-_f??~ l0 4rr~ _~_60 RUo 10 ff~~ 'f~ VJAY _-
___ ___-_= =_~ __UAND 'ff) ~ ~ f M< U~~ bY fulNr
___ _ __~~_ ~ _~ f[4c6
f ..
,J
~~P!t ~l~ ~_~ ~60V(XlJ113JL
w~1?~ ~~}~G t_
~~g~ -ro __f;:t AQ~~~~=~~
~(h lAAtfCN ~ ~1D::L S qv
-~~ Qf?- ~t~))\Ji ~pruu- CErJf:~)
Lf)I[~:JJ-/)(JtJ'hu:)- -f\JeO)
wLI2~ I\f G Itv ~ TO
~- ~(!~ ~~'I/J!1~~
- - ~_~tJtkr,_~M!tJ. N9j ~~_~ ~-
~ -- L~ U/jj~t /\fee/D J! D/JAU/S)
- ~~~~~ {AU 1+-~6)kr( '_~
- /U) b~MJ1E ~ 10 ~Jdfld!J___'D2
, _fllJ!!li 2/'SG ~ NeflD _TWD:-'~W!H ~~
-~- ~
~~~~ _~e(/Jtm)1i6 +- ej). 'o_~ (()l S
P L/tN}J}r\3 S ttwuD D}!DIs~ uJ
-
I{ [L QQM!r~l{f\[frJ $flU ~
Psffjlff~ /rJ'.f~ - fufQI
- - -
M ~ CitI~ ~
-~
- - __IYlf:1f!)~D2 ~~7)1IJ ~
~ y!- TD PlEIJu NO (j( 2{bf
-
_____~~~~-;,;r
~--'-'----~-----..,.- ~
~ ~ .~__ee
~
~~_....
- ~-.,.....o;;::o:.=
- ~ ----~~-~
- ~-=...--;;:~ - ...-=--~
~,.,...-- ~ - -
~ NWt:fflf!r2!:l_~~
~ flT~ O~~___,
~ ~ _..c ~--. ....___"'==------=-~__=
LL~
~~~ --~-..---..---~"'"'-=-'~~
~ (~ ,_t~~_1i1fft1_~-~_
11- U{AfMJU slfifl
~--.::o,.".,....~ "..~____~
Do- 71fJi~~ ~__~~
) (j~ If?\J ~fZ!:!!:J~-__
~
~_~ --..-~_~...._______ "''''C<._ ___.---=-..:--
_Itr 11- ~___<~__
-- -~...."..~-
~ - wlU--~_ ~ __0([J1-_
~(/jl!j~ rfYt{_??j!~~_
uv(S U<L~_~~_~.
L(j-It1Uby~[6 ~ ~~
~ liLY-M tl IS rJlt/6
TUf
_6VJ vf)~~
~L}' ut/(&~ ~~~ ._~_ ___.
~
c.t cop'l
~a\r~b\e~~~~~--~~-~'---
/~
........--- ---
/1 ~J~??
, IJV cPf)
\)\
AGENDA
STATION SQUARE INFILL DEVELOPMENll
July 22, 2003
...."':I:
Q) - C">
3 g OJ
~ :=:E ~
S~~
::! ^
0.. co
Q) "
to> "
to> co
0> C.
0-<
'" CD
o
c:
CD
<
~
c.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
. Introductions
en
c:
..
co
~
o
110
[~a ~~
;-GJ! s;
w ~ ~ ~ III
~ g {t... c;
m ro n =
lOe .g~
~~~ [-
~ ~ ~ Cf)
c:bc8w ~
~ g ~ 0
~"Co ~
~ g i
~ 3
'"
to>
to>
'"
. Contacts:
0Jrrz0{~~ ~
Legal- hw.AlPn 562-4010
CRA/~'jj:f11ai'SOjl- Reg Owens 562-4047/Ralph Stone 562-4058
Design/Planning - Cyndi Tarapani 562-4547/Lisa Fierce 562-4561
Engineering - Mashid Arasteh 562-4757/Mike Quillen 562-4743
. Commission Action July 17th
. Development Agreement Process
. Land Purchase
. Parking Space(s) Negotiations (cost to construct)
. Impact Fees/Incentives
. Phase I & Phase II Site Assessment
· Infrastructure Assessment f'l
. . . D . P (d. b )/,"prJUOZ €.I; !:::~oo
. Site Pian/Budding eSlgn rocess ensIty onus '""~INfKr-<J
~
~
. Unit Mix/Pricing
. Cleveland Street/Station Square Streetscape
. Schedules
~ 061. P/L gsf tl<J( fA ~ I t1Jt\
1-,L?~? ~~ ~[$ - ---BestCopy= --~
_ _ _ 1U1 1Ni1W - ~ _ _ ~~~it~~I~ ___ ~ =_
_ _ _ PA ~p~~ ~ - _~ ,_ -~_- ~~~ ~ c- _ ___ , _
- t ' ~ DO lAJCDf ~ ~ fVtN: CCl\J -
~~tf --w .~.... _ .... .. .
~t).v~.' .j].b~ f1}N ~.'(~ lOlNf ~
\\l" (J ~ o.W
~;;- Q CAJNlffA .Wlllt. ~ tkhiv( Jm~ n01Y- f21JfJ ...
f(l~ __Of ~U/~_A ~__~-~_ ~fF_~ ~
Q ~l11~ ~~~~~~JC~? h
c ~ 9f3f r ~ -.~ - ] '+ IUJ S t'tK.- AfftlMtZ.- . . o.
~G N/)JUi~ _ _ _ __ _
-~lvfhr~-_~~ ~~ ~-~-!f ~ _
~ ~~ MfbS w!C ilM1. _~7Yfrr f-ffG.. .
_ _ - ~_ -_~- ~ ]J)_ _ ~ _ _ u _ =_-_ _~ _ _ _ _
__ _ - ~ ~D _ ~ -1Jtt8 ~ ~_ _ M[ 1lND~_ l2V .}N GtJt::;
__ _ _ __ _ _ _ ~ _ '/);t}4-~~_Dj\1 11; JjJd/'J -~ wtlllj) 71tlLe ,Ib
~ -- _u__-____- ~"-- ~~--~rnu~~ -----~=~-~ = - - ~tJ/(YJ1
_ _ __~_ __ ~_ ~ _ ~ WD1& ftr ~ta~=t{1f1tz:r0 ~ _~
_ _ __~ __ ~~_-_jlItu _ PD5_~---ND.I~ iN ~L/ftf~ -=L______
- - ~ - - ~ ~- - - - - ~ ~ - =~- -- - ~ (p) ftiJfJ-- t?& A - - -
- MA-- 1K/rfflC ~-- -~ ->~~J=- -- - I (;;PeL
_~ __ _ _ __-jd~ ~f)J_ nc LUIJr6U1) M_f!:}==@V1INcE2_ -
___~ _ __- _ __ ~_ _=~=__~!j~:.- J r ___~ _ -__ - _~~ ~~ J_ _ ~____ _
- = - ~ - --- ~--- - - ,- --~~-- - - / - ~, ~ - -- ~,
Lf JiNJJr~ {(/iN i3v6v:::; . ~: /. ~
- 1> I' ~-I~~'_ ~ /Jt th) -'~ l
Jt1~ ~~ult-
Pk~ F~DA~ ~ --....=-. I;v y_ btJ? -"'-=-=--
LAND - ~
~~~~~-~ f--=~~~~-~" = -- ~~~~)
_22Lm _~~
-~~ ~~ CAN 1H1$ rfb~CMJutff-P4- /ND IJ~ ui1
F<-="~~-~ ~--~~~ 'J- - ~-~~---~
.=~--=--=:: MJt~~A thts ~ ~=t>1r:t-1~o~
C ClTj tI-th_Col~77Tl!~l;>fii_ffLir_l!!fm ,ffi r
=- a:: Irl'/~ ~. ) - J!..111L i1iLLL-___
........ . -C-~._-- 1-~-~ CC ~_:::..-
~-=-- --.,,",-~ ~ =-12~ ~ 112 f!1::j~1JL ~_ L~=~_
~~~~= ~ ~ 1mtN ~~-Cft! &P[S~f!It~Ut(JJ1
~- ~fID2 1M2 ~t ~~!2ta- ~1L~ 1]) ~ -
~~t: I:lli UtJDon1{riUIYi~ ~ ~~-~~-_.-
- Best Copy
- 7";;: Available -~-
tt1E~ T ~ .l
~~~~~ ~-- ---
~~rS? W'Itltft ~~
=-'-=-~~ - - z:; lWfr
-17~~dD ~~ 0lJj~ -
--frl~ ~- GJr~ ~~)J Z -
-- /tuiu~ IlY:::. (}J ITlf' fZ/rLfu- L~ ()~-
~~ - ~ t~_2~_~ cJN~
/' - >-= 7 T!]~~
~~~JJ2 WtJ:J!::f fJJ&_~JJJlJ:>~ f!1JW ~~_
~~ ~~ ~~gwJ__~ fvMD,___
~ ~1UfJ~ 1j) ~~~~_ _ ~
- ~ ~ -_=r- -
..... -Q~~~ ~~~~~'*- [ D'D ~~
~--
~ ~ ~~-=-~~~~ -
~~~~=-
1----
~
o _'" ~L . __. . r._.~.~
_ _ - _ - _ ~ _~ -, o-{I1iHlf2_~~1n ~ ()6l11q ~_ ~lWU2-_ PiE ~6[--
____~ _~ _ ~~_f'{tW~_ 79_- ~-lf- {USJS- 6JC /'QL
~. . .~~ . ...... N'\)'No.J -~ (N ~) ;J~.Nf(3) .~
~_ = _ ~ =~ _ ~ _~-_ _ Id _Qdf;Afl3UNJ _ _
~=~-~- - - -- --~ ---~ ~ -~~=---- -~ --- - --
~~'tcl"~_. ~-~ i5rJ .... - ~... .
- - - - - ---~~~~-~ - ~ - ~ - ~ ----~~-~ --- ~
. _ _ _ _ x =. _ ~r{o x t7e ~
~_ _~_ _ --r{) =~_ _~- _ _ -=_~= _= ~ - ---- - --- = - - -
_ -=:: __ ~......__ _ _ _ __ -=-.:.~_~~_=--_~_~ _ _ _ __ __ - -_- ~ - ~~__::.o--'::---:" --
_ Q _~ _1l2_ ~.__~~_ or_ $JW cSQ fMtL 1-
- - - uJtI^)[ _-rN ~0J: --: - ~ --:--~ - - ~ --~=-- ~ Copy -
Bes~
., ble
_ __ _ _ ______-__~-=>_---_-_- ~x~~x_=- -_ ~--Ava'~ --
<f51~~Chi. ~-- --- - -- -----
10 '-:_~~ td1:!~~.T1Q-.()Nl~.-NtJ ~
~r -- ~~)fill__. ~ --rxd l<( ~u~. tL 7 ~ f!1a1---
~~.l ~~~{rf- H ~uJJ&.__' ~TlI'
.:. .....~ l) 51)6~__L~oDJ!1 'J~'1 ~titit!!t~~
. _~ l7ruW~ -fNt<.:=; 0,D j ~1JI1':::.Lf:J.W~
._.~. _'.I~_~ e~4fX ~ ;::: .4.41) j CAN
_ _ _ = _ __~_- __- ~df~t~ ~1'f6 u"t~JT!'t!~ fdDL_ -
W)~~~ II ..~6ID ~-jKA~f~~ kv([D~
'\J:::::-:~ I t=_._- _n 11..-.- .1M~ VA 'SA1~ CT ~~ I/1tV ~
_ . ...~.'. .~.~ 5'\'1.'> ~ ~ INI'i<-t..- . .~
... .....t ~._~. - . M10 ~ c;JatNl>t--
-~ = -~J.(}o -1tl=Q1N J&)- Q~< ~ 1f4{ ~ ~IVvL
~ ~ l ~ (A.c ~ 1tIv'\A2.. GiN' 't?UVf~
-tf - '~USf ([ C/JJJ ~ ~~ tv ~
- 0l1~ 1J2 ~
nJ~JLDXlet[/~~ MgOl!-f2w~ -=
~ 6Y1lV~
BeSt copy
Avai\ab'e
.
{- ~-~
CM_. rm DJA t U'NT1~ ~ _ ~ j~lV/uJ;f ~ft
~ ~~ Ul1fbt e~_
~
Tarapani, Cyndi
From:
Sent
To.
Cc:
Owens, Reginald W
Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1247 PM
'mckpavonettl@beckgroup com'
Akin, Pam, Tarapanr, Cyndl, Harnger, Sandy, PhillipS, Sue, Campos, Geraldine, Arasteh,
Mahshld, QUillen, Michael
Station Square
Subject.
Nick
As we discussed yesterday, on June 23rd the RFP Selection Committee selected Beck as the Preferred Development
Team for the Statron Square CRA sIte
To get prepared for this project, I am taking this opportunrty to define how Beck and the City might move forward
On July 14th, our Department will be seeking approval from the CRA to commence negotiation of a development
agreement With your company
As qUIte a few departments have a vested Interest In this project, we are proposing that we schedule a short klck-off
meeting With Beck and your architects dunng the week of July 14th - we Will coordinate this With your office
After the same kick-off meeting we Will also schedule you for ongoing meetings With our Department (ED, Reg Owens
562-4047)), Legal/Pam Akin, City Attorney (562-4010), and Ralph Stone/Assistant City Manager (562-4058), and
Englneenng ( Mahshld Arasteh/Publlc Works Admin 562-4757 & Michael QUillen, Director of Englneenng 562-4743) - so
we can move forwad on the Issues surrounding the Development Agreement, inCentives, streetscape, englneerrng and
the parking allocation
This array of senror city staff In turn, Intends to meet on a regular baSIS Internally, so each department can share were
they are With deSign Issues, the development agreement and other Items
As we discussed on June 23rd, Dayhoff, L L C , has expressed Interest In becoming a partner In your group's project
They are particularly Interested In investing In the office and retail/restaurant portion and retaining ownership of these
components
As we Will be dealing With Beck as the preferred developer, It Will be your responsibility to follow up on a pOSSible JOint
venture et al With Dayhoff Like yourself, Mr Dayhoff IS away until the 9th of July, and he suggested that perhaps you
and he could get together on July 10th or 11th - Uday Lele/Dayhoff, Inc 727-443-5544 - hiS associate Anjanr Abhyankar
727-480-3775 can also set up a meeting for them Hopefully, something can be worked out between the two partles-
good luck
Please contact me If you ever have any questrons or Issues, as our department, In concert With the CRA Director Mr
Ralph Stone, Will be your lead liaison for thiS project
One last thought, I am not sure If you have actually formed an LLC for thiS project yet If not, you might Wish to conSider
a more defined name for the Project, such as Station Square LLC - just a suggestion as It might help all of us In
marketing thiS project to end users as they would then readily know where the project IS located
Thanks
Congratulations on your selection, and we look forward to an approval on July 14th to move forward Please be In
attendance at that meeting In City Hall at 1 OOpm (third floor), In case any questrons are raised
1
(ltatbU@
~y
STATION SQUARE
PROJECT TEAM WORK PROGRAM
JULY 10/11 BECK/Dayhoff meetmg to dISCUSS Jomt venture
JULY 14 - CRA approval to negotiate wIth Beck
WEEK JULY 14 - Kickoff meetmg wIth Beck, Dayhoff, Legal Counsel and
Urban StudIO Arclntects
CITY TEAM Alan, Stone, Brumback, Owens, Arasteh, Tarapam,
QUlllen, Campos, plus support staff
DEVELOPMENT TEAM NICk Pavonnettl/Beck, Beck's Legal Counsel, Uday Lele &
& AnJanI Abhyankar/Dayhoff, Dayhoffs Legal Counsel
Roger Larsen, Urban StudIO ArchItectslR1chard Zmgale
PROJECT OWNERSHIP CRA
BUlldmg DesIgn
Planmng
PROJECT LEADS
Streetscape CD's
ED/Engmeenng
PROJECT MEETINGS
The Project Teams wIll meet every two weeks from the
la.ck-offmeetmg through CDB approval to reVIew progress,
revIew desIgn approach, and solve Issues
The Planrung Department wIll meet WIth the Development
Team as needed on deSIgn Issues
BACKGROUND DATA
FOR JULY MEETING
ED/CRA - hnpact fees/sIte specIfic TIP analysIs
Parla.ng space purchase optIOns
Marketmg strategy for Restaurant/Retml
Repubhc Bank
Planrung - Fast track schedule through CDB approval
Legal -
Key development agreement Issues
EngmeennglED - Schedule for Streetscape CD's