Loading...
04/14/2008 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER April 14, 2008 Present: Frank Hibbard Chair/CRA Trustee John Doran CRA Trustee George N. Cretekos CRA Trustee Paul Gibson CRA Trustee Absent: Carlen Petersen CRA Trustee Also present: William B. Horne II City Manager Jill S. Silverboard Assistant City Manager Rod Irwin Assistant City Manager/CRA Executive Director Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Brenda Moses Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:38 p.m. at City Hall. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. 2 - Approval of Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of the March 17, 2008 CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. Trustee Doran moved to approve the minutes of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting of March 17, 2008, as recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each Trustee. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 3 - Community Redevelopment Agency Items : 3.1 Approve the East Gateway District Five-Year Action Program and FY 07-09 Implementation Work Plan. The East Gateway District was established as part of the Community Redevelopment Area in 2002. In 2004, the East Gateway Character District was created through amendments to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. In late 2005, the East Gateway Task Force was formed to identify strategies to effect positive change in the neighborhood. The Task Force is comprised of City staff from an array of departments. In 2006, the CRA initiated a neighborhood planning effort for the East Gateway District to create a comprehensive, community-based action program. With the help of a consultant, the Task Force convened focus groups and held neighborhood meetings in 2006 to solicit input from residents, business owners, community leaders and social services organizations on neighborhood needs, values and preferences. Through the process, goal statements and action items were formulated and serve as the basis for the East Gateway District Five-Year Action Program. Community Redevelopment Agency 2008-04-14 1 The overarching goals of the program are to engage the community in its implementation; achieve neighborhood stability; establish a unique and positive identity; and attract reinvestment in private property. The action items focus on five central themes that emerged during public process–Safety and Security; Business Environment; Neighborhood Appearance; Economic Growth and Housing; and Hispanic Community Integration. In 2007, a neighborhood meeting was held to obtain feedback on the draft East Gateway District Five-Year Action Program. The program’s action items were refined based on further public and Task Force input. The final step in the development of the program involved Task Force assessment of the action items relative to implementation (e.g., fiscal/operational impacts and timeframe for completion). The action items were then organized under one of two timeframes over the five- year program period – Years 1 and 2 or Years 3, 4 and 5 – based primarily on neighborhood priorities, staff resources and funding resources. Relative to funding commitments for the East Gateway District Five-Year Action Program, this CRA action addresses resource allocations for FY 07/08 and FY 08/09 action items only. Resource allocations for latter year action items (FY 09/10 and FY 11/12) will be addressed by the CRA on an annual basis in conjunction with the CRA budgeting process (beginning next fiscal year). In most cases, the action items will be accomplished with existing operational resources and department budgets (see details in the Impact Assessment & Tracking report). However, the following action items represent key cost items: Action Item S.1: Supplemental Police patrols (funding not identified) ?? Action Item S.4: Streetlights (funding identified) ?? Action Item N.2: Façade and Building Lot Improvement Program (funding identified) ?? Action Item N.6: “Five Points” Gateway Feature (funding identified) ?? Action Item H.7: Multi-cultural Celebrations (funding identified) ?? Director of Economic Development & Housing Geri Campos-Lopez said a comprehensive approach is needed to chip away at the issues in this area. She said the program can change as circumstances change. She said this neighborhood revitalization effort has no quick fix, as it takes time and commitment from the City and stakeholders. Community Development Coordinator Tammy Vrana reviewed the action items. She said many of the items are under way or have been completed and funding has been identified. However, funding needs to be identified for the additional police patrols requested by the community. Staff will present semi-annual and annual progress reports to the CRA Trustees. She said the area has a lot of potential and can be transformed. Police Chief Sid Klein said existing Police Department staff can not provide the additional patrols needed. He recommended the CRA fund the additional patrols, which would be added to the existing CHIP bicycle team. Officers funded by the CRA could only patrol the CRA district. Discussion ensued and it was felt the only way the additional police patrols could be added is by using CRA funds. It was noted systemic issues such as the locations of the Soup Community Redevelopment Agency 2008-04-14 2 Kitchen and CHIP need to be addressed. It was suggested, because the majority of the additional police presence is to address homeless issues, the County should help support the effort. Concern was expressed regarding $1.5 million being allocated for the "gateway feature." It was suggested a Penny for Pinellas project priority discussion be scheduled. Ms. Campos-Lopez said when the project was previously discussed, it was felt that the gateway feature would enhance the entrance to Downtown and encourage visitors to travel through the downtown area prior to going to the beach. Ms. Campos said the streetscape and gateway feature have not yet been designed. It was felt that additional discussion is needed regarding this item. Trustee Doran moved to continue Item 3.1 to May 13, 2008. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 4 - Other Business - None. 5 - Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 2:25 p.m. -t,.R ~ ~ir Community Redevelopment Agency \\1\1'"1111I11/1/ ~"",~'J ELOPMJ!"I" ~",.Q ~a.RW-" ~)I.:I'".. ~,,^,-vu\.o~r.l"""~$l' ~ ~~'~ /.... .~"'! ~ ~~! CORPORA lQ '\ ~:>~ * 1'1 05~ ~:2-. SE~ ~E ~~.fjQ.. ~ . :l.-" oS: -:.':0 .~~ ~ .L ~-~ ,\Jof" .L ~#' "'~III. ItORJO~ Jof",\\"", "'1111' 1lI111\\\\\\~ Community Redevelopment Agency 2008-04-14 3