ENVIRONMENTAL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FIVE YEAR CAPITAL WATER RESOURCE PROJECTS IMPROVEMENTS - SUMMARY FY 2002-2006
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Environmental and Stormwater Management
Five Year Capital
Water Resource Projects Improvements
SUMMARY
FY 2002 - 2006
LL
earwater
o
>
~
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................... ................................ i
Structure Flooding Improvement Projects ....... .................. .......... ............ ................ .......... ....... .................... 3
Myrtle Avenue Drainage and Roadway Improvements Project ........................................................... 4
Kapok Flood Resolution Project ................................... .... ..... ....... ................ ........... .................. ..... ... ... 6
Town Pond ...................... ............... ............... ...... ...... ...... .... ......... ....... .... ....... ................ ................ ... .... 8
Sharkey Road Drainage Improvement Project............................... ..................................................... 10
Alligator Creek Drainage Improvements .................. ................ ............. ....... .................... .......... ........ 12
Stevenson Creek Implementation Phase I.......... .................. ....... ....... ........... ........................ .............. 14
Momingside - Meadows Drainage Improvements............................................................................. 16
Tropic Hills Drainage Improvements................................................................................................. 18
Allen's Creek Neighborhood Flooding.... .............. ...................... ............. ......... .......... ........... ............ 20
Street Flooding Projects....................................................................................................................... ....... 22
N. Greenwood Corridor Stormwater Enhancement Project................................................................ 23
Storm Pipe System Replacement Projects ............................................. .................. ........................... 25
North Beach Drainage Improvements... ..... .... ........ ...... .... ........ ................... ............................ ....... ..... 27
Regulatory Compliance Projects................................................................................................................ 29
FDEP Compliance...................................................................................................................... ........ 30
Bridge Flooding Projects .......... ......... .... ......... ......... ........ .................. ............... ....... .... ........ ....... ................ 32
Maj or Erosion Projects............................................................................................................................... 33
Allen's Creek Gabion Project............................................................................................................. 34
Water Quality and Environmental Projects................................................................................................ 36
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration................................................................................................. 37
Alligator Creek Implementation Projects .... ................... ................ .................. ........... ................. ...... 39
North Greenwood Stormwater Retrofit. ............ .............. ....... ........... ............ ............. ......................... 41
Other Projects...................................................................................................................... ....................... 43
Storm System Expansion Project. ...... ................ .... ...... ............... ......... ......... .... ............. ..................... 44
Appendix A.... .... ......................... .......... .................... .... .... ........... .... ............. ....... ................. ...................... 46
Review and Approval Process
Appendix B ..................................................................................................................................... ............ 48
Strategic Objectives/Measuresffargets
Appendix C .............................................................................................................................. ................... 50
Stormwater Utility Project List
Appendix D.............................................................................................................................. ................... 54
Capital Improvements Program
I
I
Introduction
I
The City of Clearwater implemented a
Stormwater Utility Fee in FY 1991 to pay the
cost of stormwater drainage facilities to be
constructed City-Wide and to pay the cost of
operation, monitoring, enforcement,
administration and maintenance of the
stormwater drainage facilities of the City. (Ord.
No. 5058-90) The summary document is
intended to be an annual review document for
the Clearwater City Commission that describes
studies or projects being considered or developed
by the Engineering Department, in conjunction
with Public Service, Drainage and
Transportation. This summary document will
not describe program funding related to
operational costs, rather it will describe the
planned projects as outlined in the City Capital
Improvement Budget and planned Rate Study
Bond Improvements commencing in FY 2002
through FY 2006, inclusive.
I
I
I
I
I
I
The primary purpose for this document is to
provide the Clearwater City Commission with a
clear understanding of the purpose, justification,
and scope of planned Capital Improvement
Project (CIP) expenditures. It is also intended to
provide the City Commission the opportunity to
review and provide conceptual approval of those
planned watershed studies and water resource
projects being considered for development. City
Staff regard City Commission acceptance of this
document and any subsequent CIP budget and
rate study projects approvals as direction to
proceed to acquire grant funding for project
development as may become available. The
emphasis in describing planning and
improvement projects in this document is on
projects that City Staff are actively pursuing
through the Stormwater Capital Projects Review
and Approval Process (Appendix "A") and that
exceed a total project cost of $100,000.
Operational projects of any amount (GIS Project)
and projects less than $100,000, while listed on
each chapter cover, are not specifically described
in this document.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document is intended to provide only brief
project descriptions. Chapters are organized
based on the Engineering Department's
stormwater project "Problem Classification and
Ranking Priority", depicted in Table 1.
I
I
I
Priorit
I
2
3
4
5
6
Project and problem priorities are presented in
the page header information for each project.
The City Commission priority reflects the City
Commission Strategic Objective "Key Intended
Outcome" (KIO). The higher the KIO priority
score the greater is the Commission priority.
The KIO priority scores were established during
development of the Stormwater Utility
Enterprise Fund Business Plan in March 2001.
The Commission priority score reflects those
"Key Intended Outcome" factors that might be
addressed by implementation of the project being
considered. For example: The Town Pond
project would certainly leverage private
development funding through the City
Commission approved "Regional Retention
District" overlay, thereby satisfying that one City
Commission KIO to meet the "Major
Infrastructure Maintenance and Improvements"
strategic objective. In that instance, the KIO
would be given a score of one. The final KIO
score is the summation of each KIO priority
score for each Commission Strategic Objective
KIO that the project is expected to satisfy. The
maximum score that any project could possibly
receive is twenty-three (23). A summary of the
City Commission Strategic Objectives and
corresponding KIO's is listed in Appendix "B".
In conjunction with City Commission KIO's is
included the problem classification and priority
score, established by the Engineering
Department, Capital Improvement Stormwater
Management Steering Committee (CISM). That
score not only establishes a rank based on the
project classification, but also recommends the
order for completion of projects based on project
technical constraints. For example: using Table
I above, a project to resolve structure flooding
would receive a problem priority score of one
point zero, zero (1.00). Project implementation
would then follow in order with one point zero-
one (1.01) being the first project through one
point nine-nine (1.99) being the last project to be
completed within that problem classification
series. Technical project constraints are critical
to the successful completion of infrastructure
improvements for public safety reasons and
therefore are considered and ranked in every
project priority decision.
General project descriptions and locations, with
pictures or graphics, where appropriate, are
provided. Each description provides a brief
explanation of the project, the proposed project
objectives, current project status, and brief fiscal
information. In order to provide brief, yet
informed descriptions, certain caveats are
necessary:
1. This document reflects both Staff
recommendations for project priority, as
depicted in Table 1, and the Key Intended
Outcome (KIO) ranking score defmed by the
City Commission and interpreted by Staff as
major priority areas for this fiscal year. The
strategic objectives of the Commission
include: (1) Public Safety; (2) Economic
Development; (3) Quality of Life; (4)
Infrastructure Maintenance; (5) Human
Resources. Where differences between the
two ranking priorities are apparent, City
Commission priorities superpose the ranking
of projects depicted in Table 1.
2. Descriptions are designed to be brief and
objective. They are clearly not
comprehensive evaluations.
3. The listing of proposed water resource
projects reflect primarily structural solutions
to address the documented "primary
purpose". It is stressed that structural
solutions currently being considered do not
preclude changing to non-structural
solutions at a later date, as circumstances
and priorities may change.
4. The project status reflects either the actual
project status or the anticipated next step of
the process where that next step is imminent.
5. Fiscal summaries are to be considered
project estimates only and are subject to
change and City Commission approval
through the budget and project review
process.
I
6. A summary of all stormwater problems
throughout Clearwater is listed in
APPENDIX "C". That list is complete as
of FY'OI and includes projects to address
water resource problems documented
through either City watershed management
plans, as required by the City
Comprehensive Plan, or based on citizen
expressed complaints. This doesn't preclude
future changes to the list due to unplanned
circumstances.
7. Secured funding represents a funding
expectation that has been either approved by
the City Commission or has a signed
interagency agreement by the supporting
agency, but not yet approved by City
Commission. Un-secured cost share
information reflects an expectation that
while not specifically approved by City
Commission or through interlocal
agreement, is included for planning purposes
in agency budgets or long range planning
documents. Grants that have only been
applied for and having no agency
commitment have not been included in the
fiscal summary of projects.
8. Where funding has been approved for cost
share by others and the City of Clearwater is
also the lead agency, the City is responsible
for the initial payment of ALL project
related costs, followed by subsequent
participant reimbursement.
9. For each project, the "Needed to Complete"
line item included in each project summary
represents a line item project cost that has
been modeled in the rate study. That table
of all projects planned for and included in
the rate study update is provided as
APPENDIX "D".
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
Commission Project Cost
Priority
13 $11,104,000
11 $16,688,000
11 $13,030,000
10 $900,000
9 $4,424,044
9 $6,090,500
9 $575,000
8 $550,000
8 $600,000
TOTAL: $53.961.544
I
I
I
I
I
STRUCTURE FLOODING
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS
I
I
I
Project
I
I
Myrtle Avenue Drainage and Roadway Improvements
Project
Kapok Flood Resolution Project
I
Town Pond
I
Sharkey Road Drainage Improvement Project
Alligator Creek Drainage Improvements
I
Stevenson Creek Implementation Projects, Phase I
I
Morningside Meadows Drainage Improvement Project
Tropic Hills Drainage Improvement Project
I
I
Allens Creek Neighborhood Flooding Project
I
I
I
3
Myrtle Ave. Drainage and Roadway Improvement
Project
Brian Barker
City of Clearwater
Coastal Zone 1
Commission (KIO) 13 Problem Priority 1.01
CIP - City, Project Development
Structure Flooding, Street Flooding
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Description: The Myrtle Avenue Drainage and
Roadway Improvement Project will consist of
the reconstruction of approximately 2.4 miles of
a major north/south roadway through downtown
Clearwater between Lakeview Rd. to the south
and Ft. Harrison Ave. to the north, including
replacement of the substandard stormwater
conveyance system. Myrtle Avenue is scheduled
to be designated as Alt US 19 after a planned
road exchange occurs with the FDOT. The
Roadway improvement project must be
completed before re-designation takes place.
The proposed improvements will reduce flood
hazard along the corridor, removing 18
properties from flooding in the 100 year storm
event and flooding of 17 street locations during
the 10 year event. Implementation will improve
the viability for re-development. By improving
the stormwater system through the proposed
Myrtle A venue project and in concert with the
planned Town Pond improvements, these vacant
or under performing parcels will become
attractive development/redevelopment sites for
new businesses, bringing an increase in
economic productivity to the Clearwater
community.
Objectives:
1. Reduce flood hazards along the Myrtle
A venue corridor by replacing failing and
undersized stormwater infrastructure.
2. Improve the viability of the Myrtle A venue
corridor by becoming an attractive site for
business re-development.
3. Bring Myrtle Avenue up to current FDOT
specifications in order to exchange Myrtle
Avenue for Fort Harrison Ave.
FY 2001: The drainage plan for Myrtle A venue,
Myrtle Avenue Stormwater Improvement
Project, was completed in August 2001. The
City is currently negotiating with CDM for
design construction plan preparation. The City
has applied for FDOT funding through the
Transportation Outreach Program to fund $5.4
million of road improvements, leveraging
stormwater revenues to obtain road improvement
funding.
STATUS
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design EngineeringlPermits
Land Acquisition
Construction
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Funding from Others
Secured
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
City Share
Roadway Funding
Stormwater Utility
Total City Funding
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Less Roadway Funding
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
$ 49,500
$1,255,000
I
I
$9.100.000
I
$11.1 04.000
I
0%
I
$0
I
100%
$ 1,049,500
$ 9.355.000
I
$11,104,000
,I
$11.1 04.000
$11,104,000
$ 1,049,500
~
$ 9.355.000
I
I
I
I
I
Myrtle Avenue Roadway Improvement Project
I
I
/
.I ,:"
~( "
~.~\!~
Ii \:'(
Y',
I U
S.R. 580
I
t
-,
ii
I>
,',
1[1 "...."
../ ,J:/,~~~
I ,
I 0
~
o
:=>
N.T.S.
I
~
't-uIf
01
, I
'I')
(\
, ,
'y)
8 \
tD \
Z ~)
~ \
S SAFETY HARBOR /
~ l
~ ;/
MAIN T ~)
.-,<1
Iv ,V,;/~
.,"/J
_lJv-"'t
..:J-- (~r>.
.-l,. ('
'I
/
... ~
I
l~i\,
\ ,~~\
\:l!}~..':l
.It(~~I\\l
! '- -~;-,> ,r;MJ
! L~ "'.:-? ,.
~(.,-..'-') '-'.~
,. ~ ,~.
" -- '.
\>~.~.~:..=? '~-;,' "
\ "-.'-
(J~~/
) . !
'( ( , I
~!' }("""- .~/
A (j)
6
&iJ . ti
1?G'? '. / BELLEAIR -J:.
/ ,..,t!) I >-'
.---~)---" l..L
~
I
I
I
!1I"'f
I
".~~
I
I
I
I
I
~..,.:::.~,;-,~-
I
I
I
5
PLAN NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Kapok Flood Resolution Project
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
Alligator Creek
Commission (KIO) 11 Problem Priority 1.05
CIP - Joint, Interlocal Agreement
Flood Control, Water Quality/Environmental
Enhancement
Description: The Friendly Village of Kapok is
located in the Alligator Creek Basin and was
identified and prioritized in the "Comprehensive
Watershed Management Plan for the Alligator
Creek Watershed" (June 1997). The project was
developed cooperatively with the City of
Clearwater, Pinellas County and the Southwest
Florida Water Management District. Flooding of
the Park is recognized for its severity, frequency,
and number of affected residents. Removal of the
Park will eliminate potential flooding for 200
mobile homes, 3 bridges and 497 properties
upstream including, for example, College Hill
Estates. The project would involve the purchase
of the mobile home park and the relocation of the
residents, allowing for floodplain restoration,
wetland creation and habitat improvement, water
quality improvement, and recreation and
education facilities. The conceptual plan
proposes the recreation of approximate I y 2.6
acres of wetland and would restore the area.
Objectives:
1. Resolve property flooding.
2. Remove the existing Cliff Stephens Park
control weir.
3. Reconstruct a longer weir to reduce the 10,
25 and 100 year flood elevations upstream.
4. Excavate the project site for wetland
creation and also provide additional
floodplain storage volume that will serve to
attenuate the peak flow rate in the
downstream channel,
5. Allow for the resolution of upstream
flooding of approximately 497 structures.
6. Enhance the water quality treatment
function of the existing and proposed
stormwater facilities at Cliff Stephens Park
and Moccasin Lake Park, thereby protecting
Tampa Bay, an Estuary of National
Significance, S.W.l.M. Waterbody,
Outstanding Florida Water and Aquatic
Preserve.
STATUS
I
I
I
I
I
I
FY 2001: Funding for the design and
construction of the project has been approved in
the SWFWMD Five Year Plan. Funding for
$3.5 million for property acquisition has been
applied for through Florida Forever; however,
the status of this funding will not be known until
January 2002.
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Plalming
Design Engineering/Permits
Acquisition Relocation & Mgt.
Land Acquisition - Appraised
Relocation
Construction
Reserve
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Funding from Others
Secured
SWFWMD (Contract Pending)
U nseeured
State
Total Other Funding
City Share
Stormwater Utility
Total City Funding
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
6
I
I
I
$ 500,000
$ 2,688,000
$ 4,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 4,000,000
I
I
$16.688.000
I
18%
I
$ 500,000
l,2,500,000
$ 3,000,000
I
82%
$13,688,000
I
$13,688,000
$16,688.000
I
$16,688,000
$ 0
$16,688.000
I
I
I
I
I
Kapok Flood Resolution Project
I
,.
~.
\ IS 1':,r",.'c,'1
If., ~
'( " .
! "-
~
s',
;"-"<i>
>} ~ DUNEDIN
<{
-0:
(3
iE
I-
;:: UNION ST.
S.R. 580
\
\,
I,
I
'J'~
CIJRLEW
RD
N.T.a.
,-
I
:.] r';r-~
ii &-j
(> 7." :::;
. ~ ~~,~
J i.~'
'"
I
f
o
--'
w
<Il
vi
::J
I
'/j"'l
01
L{)
L{)
cr'
<Ii
/?
',.. )
I-
a
o
CD
z
':l
~ SAFElY HARBOR
::!'
<>
::!'
OINT RD.
MAl
-'I
..j
.Jl...w.
I
" ,~
'\
,
I
-r~
) ~=
v'- ,i,_ (~~~~-'
"r':':;,,~~" 'G"
I r'
)/'fj~
,/ ,./ N
;// ~-j'/
j I "'n
i ,I (j \,
/~ ) (i;
,@~/ ; :&.:
I ,e>. / BI:LLEAlR
;' ."~'{9'll) /
'-------.) ./
I~J
I
I
LARGO
{
o -" OU
~t
1r--7
~"]~
'-~y__,LC -tll~~~'.....,......,
3l~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7
PLAN NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Town Pond
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
Coastal Zone 1
Commission (KIO) 11 Problem Priority 1.00
CIP - Joint, Design
Water Quality Improvement, Flooding
Description: The Town Pond project is an
integral part of the plan to invigorate the
downtown area and promote development. The
downtown area was developed with little or no
landscaping, with significant asphalt and
impervious surfaces and no provision for flood
protection or stormwater quality treatment. As a
result the area is subject to frequent flooding and
the exisitng two acre pond, which persists with
nuisance vegetation, is aesthetically unpleasant
and generally poor water quality.
The project is for the constlUction of a 4 acre
stormwater treatment pond and park amenity in
downtown Clearwater to reduce existing
flooding problems and provide stormwater
treatment to protect the water quality of
Clearwater Harbor, an Outstanding Florida
Waterbody. During the development of the
project and other downtown redevelopment it
was determined that significant improvements to
the storm system in Myrtle A venue would also
be required to meet the desired level of service
for flood protection not only in the vicinity of the
Town Pond but also along Myrtle Avenue
ConstlUction of this facility will also promote a
'stormwater buy-in district' within which
development and, or redevelopment projects can
make a payment in-lieu-of for City and State
stormwater treatment requirements.
The improved site will incorporate landscape
architecture amenities to create a pleasant
environmental setting in downtown ClearwateL
Objectives:
1 Provide water quality treatment for the
Downtown Stormwater Service District
prior to discharge to Clearwater Harbor.
2. Reduce localized flooding.
3. Redevelopment incentive.
STATUS
I
I
I
I
I
I
FY 2001: 7/01 - Commission approved
the Agreement with FDEP for funding through
the Water Advisory Panel in the amount of
$400,000.
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
Reserve
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Funding from Others
Secured
FDEP - Surface Water Grant
State - SWFWMD
Federal Appropriation
I
$ 20,000
$ 610,000
$ 2,700,000
$ 7,700,000
$ 2,000,000
I
I
$13.030,000
I
49%
$ 400,000
$ 3,105,000
$ 1,295,000
I
I
Unsecured
Economic Development Land Sale $ 600,000
"Buy-In" Storm $ 1,000,000
Total Other Funding $ 6,400,000
City Share
Pem1Y for Pinellas
Stormwater Utility
Total City Funding
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
8
I
51%
$ 1,500,000
$ 5.130,000
$ 6,630,000
I
I
$13.030.000
$13,030,000
$ 1,376,809
$11.653.191
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1\
I
I
I
Town Pond
t
1
"'..
}
"i;
IU.S.
""4-
1/)1
~I
I, ~~, {,\ I
'ii' \' '.
, i'
i' ,I
\
,~ f
<<
o
'"
f---
<( UNION 51..
~
DUNEDIJI
.At"'*">
LARGO
RD,i
en
U
..J
W
en
ui
:::J
S.R. 580
f-
a
a
en
2
':':i
::i 9Ai'ETY HARBOR
::E
"
:::!'
MAIN ST._
I
/
~L~J
e-----',
r;==;;-/
"r
L, i) "1
,1-.",L
vi
:B"'f
9
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Sharkey Road Drainage Improvement Project
Brian Barker
City of Clearwater
Alligator Creek
Commission (KID) 10 Problem Priority 1.06
CIP - City, Design
Structure Flooding, Bridge Flooding
Description: The Sharkey Road Drainage
Improvement Project will consist of the
replacement of the undersized culvert crossing at
the corner of Sharkey Road and Oberlin Drive
and the reconstruction of the channel to the north
of the culvert. This project is reconm1ended in
the Alligator Creek Watershed Management Plan
(June 1997). While this project will reduce the
frequency of flooding, implementation of
downstream improvements will still be required
to meet drainage level of service in College Hill
and Rolling Heights.
Objectives:
1. To alleviate the flooding of houses
along Oberlin Drive.
2. To eliminate the overtopping of
Sharkey Road due to the existing
undersized culverts.
I
I
I
I
I
STATUS
FY 2001: The Sharkey Road Drainage
Improvement Project is cunently under design.
The next step is Commission approval to fund
project construction..
I
I
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
I
$900,000
I
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$900.000
I
Funding from Others
Secured
(0%)
lJ nsecured
I
Total Other Funding
$0
I
I
City Share
Stormwater Utility
(100%)
$900,000
Total City Funding
$900,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
$900,000
I
I
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Tlu'ough 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$900,000
$ 0
$900,000
I
I
I
10
I
I
I
Sharkey Road Drainage Improvements
I
'&r4
()I
, I
~,~.) /
/." I
~ I" \
\, ~ '.. 'r'.'.._,_ I
r. ;"
I
J
~
I 1i'> s,. --
f >}.'il w
J ~ IJ1Jl!ElllN
<{
(3
iY
t-
~ UNION ST.
S.R. 580
I
RD
t
','\,
I., '
I' .:;\'11:-
i
J
}
"\.
,fl~
'.~ r :::J'
/-.'
-..J
"
w
I
U
-'
w
<0
~
en
::i
N.T.S.
,'l
,
u
I
I
I
ok. -
I'
..~,
I~_:J
~'-~~;>
\- ,.~
'\'" "'.:;.~) 'If
\',
i )
!i ,/Yi~
~
o
o
ro
z
w
-'
5 SAFETY HARBOR
::z
"
::l'
(
I
,1'
/
I
..4t=i<>>
MAIN ST, <
",J
f'
/'j Rf/
,;1'1' !,;.A!
~.J' )
/ '('-.
.-:tt/C
/' (
.,/
I
I
/f
I:
, i
/J
A'=
(20/
, ;0
I ,Jx;o29
I '7--.)
LARGO
(
'/
~ 0/&
~~.
(r-7'
,'r'
-:!/(, '~-----"\~"'-"
$""1
x".,h".
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
PLAN NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Alligator Creek Drainage Improvements
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
Alligator Creek
Commission (KID) 9,4 Priority 1.20, 1.22-1.26, 6.05
CIP - City, Project Development
Structure Flooding
Description: The next phase of
improvements in Alligator Creek following the
implementation of the Kapok project includes,
clearing and snagging Chamlel A between
Belcher Road and N.E. Coachman Road, and
widening the channel between N.E. Coachman
Road and, U.S. 19, the installation four parallel
box culverts under U.S. 19, the installation of
larger box culverts at the entrance road to the
Solid Waste Transfer Station and the
construction of an off-line treatment pond.. The
Alligator Creek Watershed Management Plan
includes the replacement of the Old Coachman
Road and N.E. Coachman Road bridge spans,
and the widening of Channel A between U.S. 19
and Cliff Stephens Park which would require
coordination and participation by Pinellas
County In order to fully implement
improvements in this area.
These improvements would assist in resolving
flooding problems in the reach of Channel A
from Belcher Road to U.S. 19; and in Channel]
and H which are directly related to tail water
conditions in Channel A. The problem is defined
by a set of road crossings that fail to meet the 25-
year flooding level of service, in addition to
isolated instances of structural flooding during
the 100- year design storm event.
Objectives: Reduce flooding in this reach
of Alligator Creek.
I
I
I
I
STATUS
I
FY 2001 :
I
No Activity
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
I
$ 663,607
I
$3,760,437
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$4.424.044
I
Funding from Others
Secured
0%
I
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
$0
I
City Share
Stormwater Utility
100%
$4,424,044
I
Total City Funding
$4,424,044
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
I
$4,424.044
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
I
$4,424,044
$ 0
$4.424.044
I
,I
I
I
12
I
I
I
Alligator Creek Drainage Improvements
S.R, 580
I
t
I
I
,
.a (
'io.1 " '
I ~""
." }~I,;,' J
"~I, I" \:\
;,",
,
u
,J
.}
tli;
~
vi
:::J
I
if.T,S,
~
F!:
o
o
al
Z
':l
-'
:::J SAFETY HARBOR
:::>
<)
~
1<
I
'!fulf
ml
J
I
i
I
I
If
.<<~ I ~
I I
I !
-I "~':""
I c~
~,'(i :"-c,
~~.- ~.
_;;, ,~~_~' b'
I
I
I
/?/
/i~
/tf!
j gYB)
~-_J
I
MAIN S /)
l,~V/'
"'j'tr
j,~~~J
<<..{d.J ]
".Q>
[,/""1~ i
, )
"
I
S,R.
I
)
"J~~I
;I
l(~ /
/~,/)
C./
'.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_i<;i;~" ~ _~~~~~1~-Y-; ~...':l.~ -~~'t':]lM"~.-;jt~ rs: '_ .- --'m:-m~'J
I
I
13
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Stevenson Creek Implementation Phase I
Elliot Shoberg
City of Clearwater
Stevenson Creek
Commission (Kia) 9 Problem Priority 1.02, 1.08, 1.12
CIP - Joint, Project Development
Structure Flooding, Water Quality/Environmental
Description:
The Stevenson Creek Watershed Management
Plan (WMP) identifies causes and sources of
problems such as flooding, water quality
degradation, excessive channel erosion, and loss
of habitat. Once problems are identified,
recommendations are made to alleviate the
problems. The WMP focused on floodplain
Level of Service (FPLOS) deficiencies with
water quality, habitat restoration and erosion
protection incorporated where feasible. The
recommendations include capital improvement
projects, creation and restoration of habitat,
maintenance and operational strategies and
pollution reduction programs. These projects
and programs reflect the goals of the City
Comprehensive Plan.
Full implementation of WMP projects will result
in the removal of 243 of the identified 334
structures from the 100 year flood plain. Many
(28) of the remaining deficiencies are located
within the coastal high hazard area of Lower
Stevenson Creek and will remain susceptible to
flooding from storm surge. In addition the
combined projects would remove FPLOS
deficiencies at 33 locations on residential streets,
16 locations on collector roads, and on one
arterial road.
Objectives:
1. To resolve problems identified in the
watershed management plan and provide flood
protection, water quality improvement,
environmental protection and enhanced
maintenance and operational controls,
I
I
I
I
I
STATUS
I
FY 2001: The City approved interlocal
agreements with SWFWMD and FDEP in June
and July of 2001. The WMP was completed in
August 2001. The City is proceeding to project
implementation with the understanding that
details of the specific projects would retum to
the Commission before implementation begins.
I
I
FISCAL SUMMARY (FY 2002)
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
I
$ 600,000
$ 700,000
$4,790,500
I
TOTAL PROJECT COST $6.090.500
Funding from Others 55%
Secured
SWFWMD $ 970,000
FDEP ~ Water Resource Grant $ 1,500,00
Unsecured
SWFWMD $ 925,000
Total Other Funding $3,395,000
City Share 45%
Stormwater Utility $2,695,500
Total City Funding $2,695,500
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $6,090,500
I
I
I
I
I
Req u i rements
Total Project Cost
Expended Tlu'ough 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
I
$ 6,090500
$ 155,878
$5,934,622
I
I
14
I
I
I
Stevenson Creek Implementation Phase 1
I
,l
of
1
i S,R. :>aD
'\
f'=
o
o
OJ
I
N.I.S,
I
~ :
~,
!,~,!;.
!! <,
. "'1 I
'&4 ) '~II i
'll i I
vr I I
I I
..Jl~ i)
II :~
17
1~.
~1!fi~
'" -
. ...
~
:'
I
J .'
/ ;'
"
~
if)
if)
r:'
()
as
g SDR'I'Y EIARBOR
~
".
I
I
'"
vi
MAIN S
I
J!y/I
..: ~~;' ~,: I~f
./ .t'~-,
.~.
f't Y'
, i
I
Ii
1/
IF'
/[~/
-~-'~D
/ .C-..
:i"'f
i
/
I
~i~ 'I~>
, ' "',..,.........~~-II
~"'I'~" '~ t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
15
Description: The Morningside/Meadows
Drainage Improvement Project will address
home and street flooding in these two
subdivisions. Houses of major concern are
located on Flushing A venue, G lenmore Court,
Charles Drive and Chinaberry Road, Summerlin
Drive and Moreland Drive. The proposed project
will include the extension of the stormwater
collection system, removal and replacement of
the existing stormwater system and the regrading
of swales between homes.
PLAN NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Objectives:
1 . Alleviate house and street flooding.
Morningside - Meadows Drainage Improvements
AI Carrier
City of Clearwater
Aligator Creek
Commission (KIO) 9 Problem Priority 1.04
CIP - City, Project Development
Structure Flooding, Street Flooding
I
I
I
I
I
STATUS
FY 2001:
I
No Action
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
I
$575,000
I
I
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$575,000
Funding from Others
Secured
0%
I
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
I
$0
City Share
Stormwater Utility
100%
$575,000
I
I
I
Total City Funding
$575,000
TOTAL FUNDING BALANCE $575.000
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$575,000
$ 0
$575.000
I
I
I
I
16
I
I
I
N.T.S.
Momingside-Meadows
I'
~~, ,'I.
( 1~\i;\),
I . .
, I"
i \, '.J
I
: I
S.R. 580
I
CURLEW RD.
I
t
""
'" OJ
W
C vi
c;:j :::>
m
I
DUNEDm
J:
f-
a
o
[!)
<;;
'&4
Of
<l:
[)
iE
t-
~ UNION ST.
If)
If)
Ii
vi
z
W
-.J
::l SAFE.TI H.i.RBOR
:2
"
:2
,1
"
UNSET OINT RD.
,
{'
_MAIN~'.,
..~J
I
.Ai_
(J)
1 )~!?/
"",~(~'/f
/' . (7-.........J,.
..-l..... /~..-
~?,/
i
i
-I: ~1,
I
I'
i:
a
<(
o
""
<Ii
::i
DREW STREET
I
,
) .
I' (I
i i
Ii
/ ,I
I '
/ ...J
'=
/g.7/
11''':;:>"
h~~i'-'29
- ~
/) /
i'fJ~i
I
1(~ /
'/7(
Iv) J
I A
,/ :BELLEAIR
i
o
2:
<(
-.J
r
S2
J:
BELL
/
I
,L:::J (/)/.J.
~
-'
1I---7
-.
~ If"': - -'"
l../<-J ~ "".....
".
ii<>r
I
LARGO
-.J
W
IT)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
17
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
I
I
Tropic Hills Drainage Improvements
AI Carrier
City of Clearwater
Coastal Zone #2
Commission (KIO) 8 Problem Priority 1.03
CIP - City, Project Development
Structure Flooding, Street Flooding
Description: The Tropic Hills Drainage
Improvements project is located south of Gulf to
Bay Boulevard and to the west of U.S. 19 in the
Tropic Hills residential neighborhood. The
proposed project will include the extension of the
stormwater collection system, removal and
replacement of the existing stormwater system
and the design of the outfall under U.S. 19.
Objectives:
I. Alleviate house flooding for homes on
the south end of the subdivision.
2.
Reduce street flooding throughout the
subdivision.
I
I
I
STATUS
FY 2001 :
I
I
I
I
No Action
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
$550,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$550.000
Funding from Others
Secured
0%
I
I
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
$0
City Share
Stormwater Utility
100%
$550,000
I
I
I
Total City Funding
$550,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
$550.000
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$550,000
$ 0
$550.000
I
I
I
I
18
I
I
I
Tropic Hills
I
I
S.R. 580
~uIf
(If
.fL'
~\
; !~5:j
Ii '
I,
I
---=r:-o
I
t
~
~
N.T.S.
u
-'
w
<Il
vi
:;)
~
DlJIII:Dlli
I
,'.
." I
<(
U
6"
c-
o<( UNION Sf.
""
""
<>'
vi
9
::j SAP'ETY RiROOR
::>
"
:::>
~J w
j>
,/ -<
NSET OINT RD.
I
"u<<Cie<>
I
l !
--1~
I';:-=-,
~' ;==co. "
'-
..., - -, 'I ~
, .b
',""
':J
o
<(
o
a::
~
vi
::i
DREW STREET
I
, ,
,/'/
.,/ ,/
"~
,J,' ,
(i''5;1I
/ {~it~?i:~:i
'~~
/
j(~
'(I'
','
,J
.'ii<>y'
I
LARGO
,.._3
~ (t ~~._----....
~/' / '1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
19
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
I
I
Allen's Creek Neighborhood Flooding
AI Carrier
City of Clearwater
Allen's Creek
Commission (KIO) 8 Problem Priority 1.19
CIP - City, Project Development
Structure Flooding, Street Flooding
Description: The Allen's Creek
Neighborhood Flooding project is the residential
neighborhood located north of the Allen's Creek
Rehabilitation Project and to the east of Hercules
Avenue and includes Rebecca Drive, Sandra
Drive, Lees Court, Burnice Drive and Canterbury
Road. This project is intended to reduce house,
street and yard flooding due to inadequate
stormwater conveyance. The proposed project
will include the extension of the stormwater
collection system, removal and replacement of the
existing stormwater system and the regrading of
swales between homes.
Objectives:
1. Alleviate house and street flooding.
I
I
I
STATUS
FY 2001 :
I
No Action
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
I
$600,000
I
I
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$600,000
Funding from Others
Secured
0%
I
I
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
$0
City Share
Stormwater Utility
100%
$600,000
I
I
Total City Funding
$600,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
$600,000
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
I
$600,000
$ 0
$600.000
I
I
I
I
20
I
I
I
ABen's Creek Neighborhood
I
RD
I
t
N.T.S.
I
~!,
:c, I ,~,'
\ lf11~':.'",1'1
Ii . c,
)>1 II
I I
I
I
I
I
'&4
01
I
.M...-.
I
~,i~-'-c'"
~&"~
."",
I
I~~/
i
J(~ /
I
/1
//
/' /
,'-:~~~7'
/ ';~~7(/151
J 2:~-:-3-d'
(.r l
,;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'1 ,FJf~:!
:>; . ':, C ::,
~ ,':i'
f I "
<>\. i
st ; '" S'
! "t-i:>1 DUlfEDIN
si
O{
~
~ UNION ST.
~
u
G:I
en
I~
S.R. 580
't,
i'=
o
o
en
z
LU
g SAFETY EiARBOR
::>
u
::!
",
"'1
"'
'"
a::
<Ii
\ .
.. )
NSET OINT RD.
MAIN ST. -\
~
<(
1~,17'
.,~~~:t~</
~
a
""
o
'"
ui
::i
DREW STR EET
~.~;/
, '. ' 1~/
[/iv /
.!
a::
8ELLEAIR RD. LU
(
I
;~ dJU
~,
'j-----::-"
""~"-
~ .1---------...,
'\,
:xl"'f
LARGO
-'
4J
<D
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STREET FLOODING
PROJECTS
I
I
Project
Commission Project Cost
Priority
14 $2,315,001
8 $5,814,000
8 $470,000
TOTAL $8.599.001
'I
I
North Greenwood Corridor Enhancement Project
Stormpipe System Replacement Projects
North Beach Drainage Improvements
I
I
I
I
I
Project
Commission
Priority
Project Cost
City-Wide Aerial Photography*
* No Description Provided for Projects Less Than $100,000
5
$22,000
I
I
I
22
N. Greenwood Corridor Stormwater Enhancement
Project
Bob Maran
City of Clearwater
Stevenson Creek
Commission (KIO) 14 Problem Priority 2.02
CIP - Joint, Design
Street Flooding
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Description: The City of Clearwater will
begin improvements along North Greenwood
A venue corridor from just south of Palmetto
Street north to Fairmont Street. In conjunction
with this project, the City intends to upgrade the
main collector pipes running under North
Greenwood A venue and relocate them from
under the planned roundabout. This corridor
project will be a timely opportunity to replace
older pipes from under the proposed
improvements to a more strategic location for
future repair as may be needed.
Objectives:
1. Improve the City storm system.
2. Protect the new streetscape from pipe
collapse below proposed improvements
3.
Alleviate street flooding with larger
capacity drain pipes.
I
I
STATUS
I
I
I
I
I
FY 2001: The North Greenwood
Corridor Enhancement project is designed and'
on schedule for construction in November. A
change order in the amount of $225,000 for
stormwater drainage improvements will require
Commission approval.
I
I
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction $2.315.001
TOTAL PROJECT COST $2.315.001
Funding from Others (18%)
Secured
SWFWMD $ 425.000
Unsecured
Total Other Funding $ 425,000
City Share (82%)
Road Millage $ 240,000
Water/Sewer $ 425,000
Penny for Pinellas $1,000,001
Stormwater Utility $ 225.000
Total City Funding $1,890,001
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2.315.001
Requirements
Total Project Cost $2,315,001
Less Other City Funding $2,090,001
Expended Through 09/30/00 $ 0
Needed to Complete $ 225.000
23
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North Greenwood Corridor Enhancements
,~
/;1
RD
S_R_ 580
\
I
t
;2:
I
IU.S.
w
[lJ
vi
:::i
I
DUN\lDlII
o
o
<Xl
I
'&ulI
8)1
'"
'"
o!
o
')
)(
u
r5
--'
:5 SAY1m' HARBOR
~
~
RD_
I
I
I
\
!
\
) /
I'
//
//
//
G
II3fJ
::~~)fl
ui
::J
I
\h.J fJU
~:~:;>
-o'
~I../_~ "Tf'''''-...,
:.e~
UROO
I
I
"1~'
.. 4"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
24
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Storm Pipe System Replacement Projects
Bob Maran
City of Clearwater
City-wide
Commission (KID) 8 Problem Priority 2.00
CIP - City, Project Development
Street Flooding
Description: The Public Services
Department compiles a list of temporary repairs
made throughout the City-wide storm pipe
system, providing this information to
Engineering. The locations where temporary
repairs were made are evaluated by Engineering
and, where necessary, permanent upgrade and
replacement locations are placed on the annual
storm pipe replacement contract. All projects are
reviewed by the Capital Improvement
Stormwater Management Committee for
consistency with appropriate watershed
management plans and prioritized by the
Conm1ittee. Emergency projects are given the
highest priority.
Objectives:
1. Either slip-line or replace corrugated
metal pipe with reinforced concrete
pIpe.
")
....
Eliminate road base erosion and
subsequent road subsidence.
3.
Reduce sedimentation load to storm
pipes and ultimate receiving waterbody.
FY 2001: The City Commission
approved the Ammal Stormpipe Replacement
Project for FYOl in March 2001. Three of four
contract areas have been completed. Replaced
132 ft. of 54-inch pipe along Druid Road west of
Missouri Avenue. Also replaced 1900 ft. of up
to 18-inch diameter pipe at Olenwood
A venuelDruid Road and Powderhom
Drive/Huntington Lane. An additional 600 ft. of
18-inch diameter pipe will begin in the fall at
Pinebrook and Admiral Woodson Lane.
STATUS
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Funding from Others
Secured
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
City Share
Stormwater Utility
Payments in-Lieu-of Retention
Total City Funding
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
$5,814,000
$5.814.000
I
0%
I
$0
I
100%
$5,730,000
$ 84,000
I
$5,814,000
I
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $5,814.000
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
25
$5,814,000
$ 0
15-.>SI4,000
I
I
I
I
I
Storm Pipe System Replacement
I
~,:
(',~ .1;\ "
, ,1 "," .
I': . \--
1\ \ 'I
: 'I
I !
I I
Jl...- I'",
i ~'
I )
--/._'
~~5~~)
\', ..i:l
\"
:.. ,I
;i/.)'fj~j
I" /"
ji ~,
'I' ,~))
( I')
~~t
~'~~0
.:::;-.:..:-,
S.R. 580
I
t
-".1"-.
CURLEW RD.
I
Ol
RT.S.
.f
""
0::
W
I
U
--'
W
OJ
vi
=>
I
';!,4
0/
H"l
lD
'"
vi
"
_I(
I;'
iE
o
o
m
z
~
:5 SAFETY HARBOR
":!'
<>
~
I
N
'3)
C" j'
I
I
I
LARGO
!
,I
~ lJU
r;-.lo.{
(,::->,
,r~"'l:- "
\/'~ "',
"
!.B"'j-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
26
PLAN NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
North Beach Drainage Improvements
AI Carrier
City of Clearwater
Clearwater Beach Island
Commission (KIO) 8 Problem Priority 2.10
CIP - City, Design
Street Flooding
Description: The North Beach Drainge
Improvements Project will provide
improvements at various locations in the north
end of the island. The work will include the
installation of storm grate inlets and removal and
repair of the existing collection and outfall
system.
Objectives:
1. Alleviate street flooding standing water
in street.
2. Repair the eXlstmg stormwater
collection system.
3.
Repair street end outfalls.
I
I
I
I
I
STATUS
FY 2001: In-house survey has been
completed and project design has begun.
Estimated construction to commence prior to
January 2002.
I
I
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
I
I
$470,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST
I
I
$470,000
Funding from Others
Secured
0%
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
I
I
I
I
$0
City Share
Stormwater Utility
100%
$470,000
Total City Funding
$470,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
$470,000
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$470,000
$ 0
$470,000
I
I
I
27
I
I
I
North Beach Drainage
S.R. 580
l,
I
t
).
ri'
II ~"
}'.
/i):,:::~
.U
.'.f\~.
I
I
I .
~~. ,\
i-Z~ '.
:) 1""
\ ~~ \) \1."
1(' ,',
1\, '';)
I .
,
JJ=.~
.]-
"i;
:r:
()
-'
W
m
~
vi
:::J
N.T.S.
""
~
I
'&"'1
OJ
31.
()
o
~ "(
~ SAFETY HARBOR
~ ~/'
:;;;
II
c.
o
<(
o
'"
2:
uj
::J
DREW STREET
I
.J
,
,.'-~~j
QJ?/
1 /'" 'I
/;', I
.5 ,.,,-".1
~J \
/"7~,
/I "'\-~7'/"
,{~
I
PROJECT
LOCA TIONS ..
I <:l)
I " ''\
I' vf '\.'1
( ;::"
'i"k
J:>!
MAIN ST
I
I
CI
z
5
SS
:r:
a::
BEUEAIR RD.W
/
,/
1
Ikd fJU
C;-~f
u7
I .,'
':v~lf1FJ'~'-'"",
"'.
~"f
I
I
LARGO
-'
w
!1J
I
I
I
I
I
~r
~
;,--
~
I
I
I
28
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
PROJECTS
Project
Commission
Priority
Project Cost
FDEP Compliance Project
5
$1,008,000
TOTAL:
$1.008.000
Project
Commission
Priority
Project Cost
NPDES*
5
$44,000
* No Description Provided for Projects Less Than $100,000
29
PLAN NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
STATUS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FDEP Compliance
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
Not Specific
Commission (KIO) 5 Problem Priority 3.00
P&S - City, Plan Conception
Regulatory Compliance, Water Quality Improvement
Description: This project provides for the
funding of water quality enhancement projects as
required to satisfy a consent order with the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
The City has currently paid $20,000 to FDEP for
costs and expenses toward satisfying the consent
order.
Several projects have been considered for
implementation and submitted to FDEP for
review in 1999. To date, however, FDEP has not
responded to the submittal.
While the original settlement "projects" required
the expenditure of $900,000, the actual cost of
implementing projects under consideration
would be somewhat higher; therefore, total
funding in the amount of $1,028,000 is being
requested.
Objectives:
1. Satisfy FDEP Consent Order.
2. Provide water quality benefits to
Clearwater Harbor and Tampa Bay.
FY 2001 :
No action has been undertaken
this year.
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning $
Design Engineering/Perrnits $ 151,200
Land Acquisition
Construction $ 856.800
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1.008.000
Funding from Others 0%
Secured
Unsecured
Total Other Funding $0
City Share 100%
Stormwater Utility $ 1.008.000
Total City Funding $1,008,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1.008.000
Requirements
Total Project Cost $1,008,000
Expended Through 09/30/00 $ 0
Needed to Complete $1.008.000
30
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FDEP Compliance
~~...,~ (.~
. .." .-. -.,
O.""'~t"'::"':'U ..~..- .,*,
<~~.,....
~:
~~!r-
31
32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BRIDGE FLOODING
PROJECTS
Project Commission Project Cost
Priority
None
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MAJOR EROSION
PROJECTS
Project
Commission
Priority
Allen's Creek Gabion Project
9
TOTAL:
33
Project Cost
$681,779
$681.779
PRO.lECT NAME:
PRO.lECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASI N:
PRO.lECT PRIORITY:
PRO.lECT STATUS:
PRO.lECT PURPOSE:
STATUS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Allen's Creek Gabion Project
AI Carrier
City of Clearwater
Allen's Creek
Commission (KIO) 9 Problem Priority 5.00
CIP - City, Construction
Major Erosion, Bridge Flooding
Description: The ongoing Allen's Creek
Gabion project is located north of Gulf to Bay
Blvd. and south of Cleveland St. at Rainbow Dr.
This project is necessitated by increased flow
rates in the Allen's Creek channel caused by
expansion of the stormwater system on
Cleveland St. The project consists of channel
realignment and sidebank stabilization utilizing
the construction of gab ion baskets and gabion
mattresses. The project also includes the
replacement of an existing 72 inch corrugated
metal pipe with a 7 foot by 20 foot ConSpan
bridge structure at Rainbow Dr. Due to the
nature of the project x homes will be removed
from the 100 year floodplain.
Objectives:
1.
To eliminate the ongoing erosion that
has caused portions of the creek owned
by the City from encroaching into
private property.
2.
To alleviate roadway overtopping at
Rainbow Dr.
FY 2001 : The Commission approved
award of construction in May 2001.
Construction is presently underway.
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design EngineeringlPerrnits
Land Acquisition
Construction
$ 16,550
$ 665.229
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$ 681.779
Funding from Others
Secured
0%
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
$0
City Share
Stormwater Utility
100%
$ 681.779
Total City Funding
$ 681,779
TOTAL FUNDING BALANCE $ 681.779
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$ 681,779
$ 14.950
$ 666.829
34
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------
AUens Creek Gabion Proj ect
RD
t
j/"'f
~
()
--'
w
!Xl
iii
::J
N. T.S.
~"
'" I '
\ :1"'1 ,:,",
'I ~~ '; """.
S.R. '580
s"
~"'" .
-,I, I'!d DUNEDIN
<(
-<:
l5
g:
;i Ur-.ION ST.
I
f-
o
o
rn
.z
w
-J
:j SME'IT HARl30R
tj
~
~
"'
LI)
ri
vi
'&ulI
OJ
~
NSET OINT RD.
IAAIN .I"
,c.-j
;:'
.l:~~f
d-"' .I
~f-- _.
, ,
i t-,-'
~~',
\;-" ~"----'
" - ...
vi
::i
DREW STREET
Q
<(
o
fr:
/ r~ ~~'"
~/
i/'P',," /
/r
,II
,," /
I .l.~,
1<'--
/~~0~J)
)'1S~j
p'
Xcn-6-
1/1)
{
(J/d.
LARGO
35
Commission Project Cost
Priority
12 $7,000,000
12 $2,216,000
7 $330,779
TOTAL: $9.546.779
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WATER QUALITY &
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROJECTS
Project
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration Project
Alligator Creek Implementation Projects
North Greenwood Stormwater Retrofit Project
Project
Commission
Priority
Coopers Point Restoration & Management Project*
7
* No Description Provided for Projects Less Than $100,000
36
Project Cost
$92,000
PLAN NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
I
I
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration
Elliot Shoberg
United States Army Corp of Engineers
Stevenson Creek
Commission (KIO) 12 Problem Priority 6.00
P&S - Joint, Scope and Participation Criteria
Water Qualityl Estuary Restoration
Description: The Stevenson Creek Estuary
discharges to Clearwater Harbor at the
intersection of Ft. Harrison Street and Sunset
Point Road. The Estuary Restoration Project
was prompted by response to community
concerns to reclaimed water expansion in the
North Greenwood community. Through the
Brownfields Environmental Justice plan, the
community requested this project to have
primary importance. The dredging will focus on
accumulations of material and restoration of the
estuary. Approximately 80,000 cubic yards of
muck deposits, primarily located between the
Fort Harrison Avenue Bridge and the Pinellas
Trail Bridge, will be dredged to help improve
water clarity and improve the habitat. 10,000
cubic yards of material will be dredged to open
up restricted tidal flows at the Fort Harrison
A venue Bridge. Without the project, the
Stevenson Creek designated Outstanding Florida
Waters (Chapter 17-3.041, F.A.C.) and Class III
waters would probably continue to degrade in
environmental quality. Odors from the area
would continue to be baneful and aesthetics
could decrease.
Objectives:
1. Reduce odors associated with the organic
muck, improve area aesthetics, restore
dissolved oxygen levels and help
reestablish the estuary tidal flow
2. Preserve the natural estuary.
3. Sea grass and mangroves will be planted
in the Estuary.
4. The USACOE Environmental Restoration
Report to demonstrate Federal Project
Justification. Without Federal
Justification, this project is underfunded
by $4,550,000.
STATUS
I
I
I
I
I
I
FY 2001: The USACOE completed the
Preliminary Restoration Plan (PRP) in October
2001. The USACOE is conducting a feasability
study for the Stevenson Creek Estuary
Restoration with an expected completion date of
April 2002. The next step will be to bring a
Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) between
the USACOE and the City of Clearwater to the
Commission for approval. The City has applied
for federal funding support to the United States
Congress for $4,550,000 in FFY02.
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Perrnits
Land Acquisition
Construction
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Funding from Others
Secured
Unsecured
USACOE
Total Other Funding
City Share
Stormwater Utility
Total City Funding
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
37
$ 552,118
$ 646,208
$ 1,270,000
$ 4,531.674
I
I
I
$7.000.000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
29%
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
71%
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
$7.000.000
$7,000,000
$ 0
$7.000000
I
I
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration
I
I
/
3(~ /
c~.(
UI
,;
) IJEIJEAIR
(
[,
I.'
/~J
(./
I
t
,1\., 'j
/ ,;~,\II
N,T,B, '~j
I
'&uIf
(JI
~
~I
(~~,.~, "\
11\' ';'.
,II, 'I,)
'[1,
I, '"j
I !
I i
, ~
:1 ~l
-u
~~~.~
) ,
I
I
J
I
~
I
SAl'ETY HARBOR
,
)
I
I
MAIN ST. .(
/J'
f
\,,}~~;
",l~,':i)
... - (J
( '-F"
i .f c'"
i~:i/
If.?)
I
//
/1
I'
! J
IE'
,(2:2/
/,1;{Ciccl
....---.-'
o
::J
RD.
\b.J. Ok/.
~
L~ ,{ ..:;~
~,r-' ~ ""
~"Y
I
I
I
I
~~---:~~~:~-~~~-:.::':;:"--:'~~+-;=- -:~~~ -'
;
- f
I
I
I
I
I
38
PLAN NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Alligator Creek Implementation Projects
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
Alligator Creek
Commission (KIO) 12 Problem Priority 6.04
CIP - Joint, Construction
Water Quality Improvement
Description: This project IS for the
construction of three projects that were
recommended for implementation in the
Alligator Creek Watershed Management Plan
that was developed in cooperation with the
Southwest Florida Water Management District,
Pinellas County, Safety Harbor and the City of
Clearwater.
The projects are:
1 . Stabilization of Channel B between SR 590
and Moccasin Lake Park using gabions;
2. Moccasin Lake Park Sediment Sump and
Rehydration which includes the construction
of a pond and in-line sediment sump to catch
sediment and trash and treat stormwater
before it discharges into the park.
3. Cliff Stephens Park Dredging and Sediment
Sump which includes dredging of the
westernmost pond in Cliff Stephens Park
and the construction of a sediment sump to
catch sediments before they reach the lake
proper.
The projects are cooperatively funded by
Clearwater, Pinellas County, the Southwest
Florida Water Management District, Florida
Department of Environmental Protection and the
Tampa Bay Estuary Program
Objectives: Eliminate erosion in Charmel
B upstream of Moccasin Lake Park; catch
sediments for removal before entering the park
and rehydrate the park by restoring flow to
historic channels; capture sediment from
upstream for removal in an area of Cliff
Stephens Park that is accessible and can be
maintained regularly.
STATUS
I
I
I
I
I
I
FY 2001: In May 2001 the Commission
approved a second amendment with the
SWFWMD and others for implementation of the
watershed management plan for Alligator Creek
Watershed, providing for a time extension to
July 2002 and reallocating funding.
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Plalming
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Funding from Others
Secured
State (SWFWMD)
County
Safety Harbor
FDEP
TBEP
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
City Share
Stormwater Utility
Total City Funding
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
39
I
I
$ 456,500
$ 254,500
I
$1,505,000
I
$2.216.000
52%
I
$ 596,158
$ 255,196
$ 10,675
$ 242,000
$ 37,500
I
$1 141.529
I
I
48%
$1,074,471
$1.074.471
$2.216.000
I
$2,216,000
$ 662,637
$1 553.363
I
I
I
I
AHigator Creek Implementation
~
I
I
I
\~~~ CURLEW
;--- '.
r;f~
I:'~j /Ui
c;:s
'/1--'
// ~'
,I
U) ~s'\.
" ~.;; .
,J 'j; DUNEDlN
:) <{
<{
[j
~
<( UNION ST.
I
t
J
}
""
N.T.S.
I
~
'I
i";",
\iR I. .
'I~
]i '
1\
1'1
I ,
I /
Ii
;
~
I
'&4
ff}!
LARGO
I
.JJ~
'j)
1".(
I
11_-
~'~'-'
\ ,.
'\~I.
,\, '..QULF
i,!
I
/'fJ~
x~ l
. -'i
',' I
( :<>:
/ B&LLEAIR -s-
)
.' .
/1'
.'/
/ l
/ /
/.-$
Ie:;
I ~;~~t~1
Cl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
40
RD~,_
!
m
vi
:J
S.R. 580
\
il:
o
o
OJ
Z
w
-'
:5 SAFE'I"f HARBO R
::;:
()
:2
~
vi
::i
!
'L-j
fB"'f
-'
LU
en
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
North Greenwood Stormwater Retrofit
Elliot Shoberg
City of Clearwater
Stevenson Creek
Commission (KID) 7 Problem Priority 6.02
CIP - Joint, Construction
Water Quality
Description:
The City of Clearwater is installing two
Continuous Deflection Separation (CDS) units
for treatment of stormwater runoff that is
currently discharged to Stevenson Creek. The
smaller unit will be installed at Pennsylvania
A venue between Grant and Marshall Streets and
will not be monitored. The larger of the two
units will be monitored for an eight-month
period and will be installed at Missouri A venue
and Palmetto Street. The monitoring will
include analyzing pollutant removal efficiency of
the unit and characterization of the material
collected in the sump.
CDS devices are designed to function as gross
pollutant traps to capture debris and other
floatables, coarse sediment and sediment-bound
pollutants. The CDS technology is designed to
divert low flows through the unit and let a
portion of the major rainfall events bypass the
unit to avoid flooding problems. Heavier solids
drop into the containment sump and a perforated
separation panel keeps the floatable items from
leaving the unit. The materials that collect in the
sump do not have to be removed after each
storm, only when the sump is full.
Objectives:
I. To monitor the overall ability of the
CDS unit to reduce the stormwater
pollutant loading to Stevenson Creek.
2. To evaluate the ability of the CDS unit
to capture floatables and coarse solids
not typically measured, to ensure cost-
effective management in future usc
budgeting.
3. To collect rainfall, runoff and flow data
from eight (8) statistically significant
storm events within a period of eight (8)
months of sampling.
I
I
I
I
I
4. Memorial Causeway Bridge water
quality mitigation.
I
STATUS
I
FY 2001: This project was approved by
the City Commission in March 2000 as a design-
build contract. The Commission also approved
an amendment to this contract, bringing the total
from $258,472 to $330,779, in January 2001.
The project is cUlTent1y under construction. The
CDS unit at the location of Pennsylvania Ave.
and Grant St. has been completed.
I
I
FISCAL SUMMARY (FY 2002)
Project Cost
Plam1ing
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction $330,779
I
I
TOTAL PROJECT COST
I
$330.779
Funding from Others
Secured
SWFWMD
Unsecured
30%
$100,000
I
Total Other Funding
I
$100,000
City Share
Stormwater Utility
Total City Funding
70%
$230,779
$230,779
I
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
$330,779
I
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$330,779
$ 35,829
$294.950
I
I
41
I
I
I
North Greenwood Stormwater Retrofit Project
I
IX
W
I
u
--'
w
m
~
o
;:)
CURLEW RD.
i
cl
.~
J
,I
,
I,
I
I
N,T,S.
,
;',j~,
'1 "
I
~
I
'&u1{.
01
.Ai"""",
I
I
I
'y;;~
i
/./
/:
, I
I,
i/
/L--.J
/~~I
//{'if;;;~;<!
xrwi- /
,-'I
I,' I
,j "i
/ BEll.urn ~
a:
BELLE R RD. W
LARGO
-'
,-"
a:l
I
I
I
o
o
m
z
1-"
-'
S S~F[TY ELiIlIlOR
2
o
::;;
MAIN ST. 'S
l~,:~/
-'/~i
, --,'
i t'-'
~~
I
}tee
,.
I
I
I
I
!ti<, .
~-
. ---1
..,,/
----
",./
,---
----
c..--""'"
--
~'>". "'~
~i~";;. ",/,.~.,,:.. :_::~~~.
." ,-'- -- '.
.. - --.-.'
1.-
. {
$'. .
I
I
I
42
.--
/~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project
Storm System Expansion Project
OTHER
PROJECTS
Commission
Priority
4
Infrastructure Management System (GIS)
{No Description Provided}
Project
Citywide Aerial Photography*
Air Conditioner Replacement*
5
TOTAL:
Commission
Priority
7.02
N/A
* No Description Provided for Projects Less Than $100,000
I
I
43
Project Cost
$4,000,000
$464,000
$4.464.000
Project Cost
$22,000
$14,000
PRO,JECT NAME:
PRO,JECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PRO,JECT PRIORITY:
PRO,JECT STATUS:
PRO,JECT PURPOSE:
Storm System Expansion Project
Tom Miller
City of Clearwater
City-Wide
Commission (KIO) 4 Problem Priority 7.04
P&S - City, Conduct Study
Flood & Water Quality Protection
Description: The City of Clearwater has
completed watershed management plans in those
drainage basins identified by the City
Comprehensive plan for implementation. Each
watershed plan makes recommendation in the
form of project altematives to resolve flooding,
water quality and environmental problems.
Many of those alternatives include the
acquisition of flood prone properties that cannot
be adequately protected by structural
improvements in a manner that is also cost-
effective. In effect, to acquire the property is
more cost-effective than to design and build an
infrastructure improvement project.
Historically, the City has waited to acquire flood
prone lands until the public need and the
availability of funding to address that need are
simultaneously realized. Typically, that would
occur in reaction to a significant flooding event.
The City has not had the benefit of long range
watershed improvement plans to identify flood-
prone lands for acquisition as a cost-effective
solution to overcome flooding problems. As a
result, delays in project implementation,
combined with the public's frustration over
continuous and unabated flooding has led to
more contentious resolve that has included
escalated property acquisitioin costs and on
occasion, added legal costs to the City and to the
public property owner. For example, in 2000,
the City acquired two duplexes on Spencer
Avenue to overcome a series of serious flooding
problems. Settlement costs were $300,000. Had
that property been acquired in advance of the
recurrent flooding event and subsequent
litigation that included attorney fees and
damages, acquisition at the appraised value of
$158,000 may have been a more realistic
settlement cost.
Objectives:
1. Inform property owners of flood potential.
I
I
I
I
I
2. Create a permanent property acquisition
fund.
I
3. Acquire flood-prone properties where
benefit cost warrants that purchase.
I
STATUS
FY 2001:
I
No activity
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design EngineeringlPerrnits
Land Acquisition
Construction
I
$4.000.000
I
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$4.000.000
I
Funding from Others
Secured
0%
Unsecured
I
Total Other Funding
$0
I
I
City Share
Stormwater Utility
1 00%
$4.000.000
Total City Funding
$4,000,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING
$4.000.000
I
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$4,000,000
$ 0
$4.000.000
I
I
I
44
I
I
I
Stormwater System Expansion
I
'ti4
iDf
~
~,
Ci~,
I : ~ \
I,
1\
,II
I
,I
i
I
!'
'1-
i
)
S.R. 5BO
I
I
t
J.
.f
~
TF":
~ ,,'
. , "
,'.',-.',...o.~
.. .0)
,!,I' -
I,H vi
c :;:,
1--.'
CURLEW
RD
~"'"
'~
~
N. r.s.
::!:
U
-'
W
III
vi
::}
I
I
~
I
I
I
~
~ UNION ST.
to
Ii)
f-
a
a
m
z
w
-'
-'
~ SAFETY HARBOR
2
u
::;;
DUNEDIN
""
vi
vi
::i
, '-../ )71,~;~/ '
~ J' (' ..} \1
/ '1--\,
'.... "
,A;f,,,,'
i~,\jl{ /'
I
I
o
<(
o
Q::
DREW STREET
SR. 6
!-~~ ~-\r_
$'3'f
LARGO
Q::
RD.W
--' L,
~ 'll~/"_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
45
I
I
I
I APPENDIX
I A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 46
-------------------
REVIEW AND ApPROVAL PROCESS - STORMWATER CAPITAL PROJECTS
PLANS & STUDIES (P & S)
City
Concept Plan
Develop Study Scope
City Conducts
Study
Consultant
Study
Joint
Concept Plan
Develop Study Scope &
Participation Criteria
Consultant Study
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
City
Project Development
City Conducts
Designs
C()~i~sion .
... App~()ves..
. Consriitant .
Selecti~n. for ..
Design ...
Joint
Project Development
I
I
I
I APPENDIX
I B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 48
I
I
I
Strate ic Priori
Infrastructure
Maintenance & Improvements
I
Human Resources Issues
I
Economic Development
I
I
Quality of Life
I
I
Public Safety
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Strategic Objectives/Measures/Targets
Ke Intended Outcomes KIO
1. CIP's need to improve LOS.
2. CIP's directly leverage private investment.
3. CIP's need to elevate aesthetics and enhance natural beau
4. Improve Customer Satisfaction
5. Increase Customer trust confidence in city government
6. Develop employees who have the skills and commitment to deliver
uali service to our customers
7. Clearwater will be a regional leader of "industries of the mind"
(financial, insurance, real estate of technology driven businesses)
8. Clearwater's downtown will be redeveloped into a branded destination
9. Clearwater will be a premier, family coastal vacation destination in Fla.
10. Clearwater will have valued position as a preferred community for
families to live.
11. Clearwater will have successful partnerships that result in a well-
educated, well-rounded citize
12. Clearwater has a distinctive presence consistent with its natural beauty.
13. Clearwater offers diverse educational, cultural and recreational
opportunities.
14. Clearwater is reco nized as a referred lace to live, work and la .
15. Clearwater is a city free from blight.
16. Clearwater is proactive in its promotion (or support) of community well-
being.
17. Clearwater strives for overall effective communications.
18. Clearwater is a city that values diversity.
19. Clearwater provides efficient and effective movement of all types of
traffic.
20. Clearwater is proactive in its promotion (or support) of community well-
being.
21. Clearwater strives for overall effective communications.
22. Clearwater is a city that values diversity.
23. Clearwater provides efficient and effective movement of all types of
traffic.
I
I
I
I APPENDIX
I C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I 50
!.
STORMWATER UTILITY
PROJECT LIST
I
Priority KIO Class WS Location PROBLEM TOTAL COST
2.02 14 F-2 STC North Greenwood Conidor Stormwater Coordination replacement with Enhancement $225,000
Enhancement Project
In conjunction with Town Pond, resolve 17
street LOS defICiencies and remove 18
1.01 13 F-1 CZl Myrtia Ave Drainage Improvement Project structures from 100yr fbod. $11,104,000
OveraU water quaity. sedimentation/erosion.
6.00 12 WQ.l STC Stevenson Oeek Estuary Restoration and fbod protection planning project that wiD $7,000.000
also inckJde dredging.
6.04 12 WQ-l AGC Algator Oeek Implementation Projects (elff Mgator Creek Watershed Plan project with $2,216,000
Steven's Park, Mxassin Lake, Olarlnel B) SWFWMD and Pinel1as County.
1.00 11 F-l CZ 1 Town Pond Commercial property fboding and significant $13,030,000
water quaity improvement project.
Significant in-structure fboding and as a resul
1.05 11 F-1 AGC Kapok Fbod ResoUtion Project of previous site devebpment, signifICant $16,688,000
reduction in fbod level of service basin wide.
1.02 Remove 33 structures! 78 dweling units from $2,203,240
10 F-l STC Glen Oaks 100yr fbod
1.06 10 F-l AGC Sharkey Road Drainage Improvement Project Property and Street Fboding, bridge $900,000
overtopping
1.24 10 F-1 AGC Replace Coachman Road Bridge span $354,000
Construct parallel BC from aty Fbod Detention
1.32 10 F-l AGC Faciity to N. Lagoon arola & remove existing $944,000
weir.
Construct parallal BC on west side Becher to
1.33 10 F-1 AGC channel A; regrade channel 0 from Sunnydala $448,000
to BeCher.
1.04 9 F.l ALC Momingside Meadows Drainage Improvements Property & Street Fboding. $575,000
(Fushing/ Olinabeny/ Moreland! Summerin)
1.07 9 F-l STC Expansion of Lake Bel'evuelUpper Lake Remove 8 structures/17 dweling units from $1,337.884
Bel'evue CUNerts 100yr fbod
Spring Branch Fbod Detention Basin/Spring Remove 21 structures! 21 dweling units from
1.08 9 F.l STC Branch Conveyance Enhancements Upper & 100yr fbod $4,157,360
Lower
1.09 9 F-1 STC Jeffords StlBany Rd Detention Pond Remove 12 structures from 100 yr fbod $1.690.634
1.10 9 F-l STC SI. Thomas DrlBellavue Bl.td Creek Restoration Remove 19 structures from 100 yr fbod $1,801,913
1.11 9 F-l STC Crast Lake Expansion & Duncan AvelTumer St Remove 17 structures from 100 yr fbod $2,376,418
Detention Pond
1.12 9 F-l STC Palmetto SI. Sediment Pump Remove 1 structure from lOOyr fbod $544,546
1.13 9 F-l STC Hilcrest Ave Overlbw Bypass CUlvert Remove 42 structures from 100yr fbod $2.299,109
1.20 9 F-l AGC 4-72' RCP Improvements under US Hwy 19 at Fbod Protection $3,080.270
Mgator Oeek
1.21 9 F-l AGC Widen Olannel A from US Hwy 19 to Glff This project is Pinellas County jurisdiction, but $0
Stephens Park must be addressed in this order.
1.22 9 F-1 AGC Soid Waste Transfer Station Entrance CUlvert $208.302
Replacement
Widen Olannel A from Old Coachman to US
1.23 9 F.l AGC Hwy 19 end construct bypass channel to new Fbod and major erosion protection. $247,630
treatment pond.
1.25 9 F-1 AGC Widen, deepen Olannel A from N.E. Coachman $427,614
to Old Coachman
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
, I
I
,
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SWUPLKIO-Priority SORTFinal.xls
9/271011
I
STORMWATER UTILITY
PROJECT LIST
I
Priority KIO Class WS Location PROBLEM TOTAL COST
1.26 9 F-1 AGC Clear/Snag Channel A Erosion Repair BeCher $102,675
to Old Coachman
1.27 9 F-1 AGC Regrade Channel A from Hercules to Sunshine $96,500
Drive and replace road crossings
1.28 9 F-1 AGC Channel A, replace access road culvert $35,000
1.29 9 F-1 AGC Replace Channel B Office Complax access road $21,000
cufJerts
1.30 9 F-1 AGC Replace S. Lagoon Orela cufJerts in Channel C $92,500
1.31 9 F-1 AGC Replace N. Lagoon Orela CUM3rts in Channel C $482,000
1.34 9 F-1 AGC Replace Sunnydale box culverts $59.000
1.35 9 F-1 AGe Replace Private Drive Culvert in Channel F $33,500
1.36 9 F-1 AGC Replace Campbell Rd. CuM3rts $38,500
1.37 9 F-1 AGC Replace Beville Road Culverts $42,200
1.38 9 F-1 AGC berm for Cameron Apt. Complex pond. In $31,400
1.39 9 F-1 AGC Replace Old Coachman Road CuM3rts $206,700
1.40 9 F-1 AGC Restore Connection between Borrow Pit and $48,300
Moccasin lake
5.00 9 E-1 ALC Allen's Creek Gabion Project Major erosion control project. $681,779
5.01 9 E-1 STC Byram Pond Dredging & Expansion - Spring Water Quaity / Maintenance $831,636
Branch Stabilzation Union St to Byram Pond
5.03 9 E-1 AGC Stag Run Boulevard & Wetherington Road $1,500,000
1.03 8 F-1 CZ2 Tropic HiDs Drainage Improvement Project Property & Street Fboding. $550.000
(Burma)
1.14 8 F-1 STC Flagler Dr/CSX Rairoad North Swale Remove 3 structures from 100yr fbod $737,241
Improvements
1.19 8 F-1 ALC AIIans Creek Neighbort1ood Fboding (Rebecca, House Fboding. $600,000
Burnice, Sandra, Canterbury)
lpe !alures Incuoe YVllnawara 'assage, I\lr
2.00 8 F-2 An Pari<, Overlaa, Unwood, Beaumont, Collage HiD $5,814,000
2.01 8 F-2 AGC Pipe faiure $25,000
2.03 8 F-2 STC Overbrook Ave Detention Pond Street Fboding I Water Quaity $1,755,000
2.06 8 F-2 STC Major Street Fboding $400.000
2.07 8 F-2 STC Myrtia AvenuelSeminola Streets NE OullaD Major storm pipe faiure imminent and present $814,000
System system is undersized and under homes.
2.09 8 F-2 ALC 415 North Duncan Undeffiized pipe with major street fboding. $126.000
2.10 8 F-2 BCH North Beach Drainage Improvements Minor Street Fboding $470,000
2.12 8 F-2 BCH 228 Do~hin Point, 286 Windward Passage, 333 $78,000
Island Way
2.13 8 F-2 AGC Mari~ St., off N.E. Coachman InsuffIcient storm sewer system
2.14 8 F-2 STC Frankln Street, Uncoh East to Stevenson Water jumps curbs with undersized pipes. $281,300
Creek & Hilcrest west to Stevenson creek Property fboding.
4.03 8 F-3 CZ 1 1802-1811 Apache Trail $78,000
4.04 8 F-3 CRC 2640 Countryside & Enterprise Road (goW $65,000
course\
7.05 8 0 CRC Curlaw Creek WMP 0
1.15 7 F-1 STC Turner St Box CuM3rtS Remove 5 structures from 100yr fbod $1.554,761
1.16 7 F-1 STC Woodlawn Terrace Storm Sewer Replacement Remove 4 structures from the 100yr fbod $446,783
I
I
I
II
:1
1\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SWUPLKIO-Priority SORTFinal.xls
9/271012
\\.
I
STORMWATER UTILITY
PROJECT LIST
I
2.05
2.08
502
7
Class WS location PROBLEM
F-l STC Palmello SI. Drainage Improvements Remove 2 structres from the 100yr fbod
F-l STC Sma!Moood Cir Drainage Improvements Remove 2 structres from the 100yr fbod
F-2 STC N Missouri AvelPalmello St Drainage Street Fboding I Water Quaity
1m rovements
F-2 STC Saturn Ave Drainage Improvements Street Fboding
F-2 STC Cearview lake Street Fboding / Water Quaity
E-l STC Upper Stevensons Creek Stabiization Erosion
WQ-l STC Betty lane Forested Habitat Preservation Site Water Quaity
TOTAL COST
I
Priority
KIO
1.17
7
$735,643
I
1.18
7
$161,283
2.04
7
$486.615
$303.382
$620,000
$1.415,843
I
6.01
7
$1.100,000
6.03
Improve fbatabe and sediment iller control to
WQ-l STC North Greenwood Stormwater Retrofrt Stevenson Creek; Memorial Cswy. Bridge
Mitigation.
7 WQ-l CZ3 Coopers Point Maintenance
5 C-l STC,AGC FDEP Compiance Permit non-rompiance
5 F-2 All Infrastructure Management System Administration
5 F-2 All aty.Wide Aerial Photography Administration
4 WQ-l STC lake Hobart Outfall Control Structure Water Quaity
4 WQ-l AGC Olannel'A'/Soid Waste Transfer Station Offine water quaity improvements to Olanne
Treatment Pond 'A'
$330,779
6.02
I
7.03
7.01
7.02
$92.000
$1,008,000
$464,000
$22,000
3.00
I
I
$14.300
6.05
$357,553
I
6.06
WQ-l
BSC
Imperial Oak Condominium - drainage ditch at Structure faitJre causing aesthetic probems at
rear of property this time. Staff monitoring for erosion.
$900,000
7.00
0-1
PSC 2997 Eage Estates Circe East
MaJunctioning retention area.
$26,000
$4,000,000
I
7.04
4
o
All
.~-. ,- .._~
iI' ~ ~c".. ,,~ ;'t -;;<:- ~'<' >
~~~",i:2\\l~I.' .;. ,<- ....'_
If, ~ ~~, 1l!, J:..,. ~~,-..;. ...:~
land Acquisition
Priority
Cost
I
F-1/Stucture Flooding
$70,492,906
p
r FY01 Stormwater Bond
0
j FY02 Stormwater Bond
e
FY03 Stormwater Bond
FY04 Stormwater Bond
FY05 Stormwater Bond
R&R Improvements
y
F-21Street Flooding
$11,884,297
I
C-1/Regulatory Compliance
$1,008,000
I
F-3/Bridge Flooding
$143,000
E-1/Major Erosion
$4,429,258
I
WQ-1/ Water Quality & Environmental
$12,010,632
I
0-1/other
$4,026,000
I
Grand Total
$103,994,093
I
I
I
SWUPLKIO-Priority SORTFinal.xls
9/271013
I
I
I
I APPENDIX
I D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I 54
I
I
I
Proiect Descriotion
Global Positioning Survey Eq
Air Conditioner Replacements
Stormwater Quality Impr
Habitat Restoration & Impr
Storm Drainage R&R
Allen's Crk Rehab at Hercules
Alligator Crk Implementation
Cooper's pt Restor & Mgmnt
Storm Pipe System Replacement
Town Pond
N. Greenwood Stmwtr Retrofit
Allen's Crk Gabion
Stevensons Crk Estuary Rest
NPDES
FDEP Compliance
City Wide Aerial Photography
PW Infrastructure Mgmnt Syst
N. Grnwd Corr Enh (Stmpipe)
Aliens Crk Neighbrh Flooding
Alligator Creek Drainage Imprvmnt
Morningside/Meadows Drainage
Improvements
Kapok Mobile Home Park
Myrtle Avenue Drainage
Improvements
N. Beach Neighborhood Drainage
Sharkey Rd Drainage
Improvements
Storm System Expansion
Stevensons Creek Implementation
Projects
Tropic Hills Drainage
Improvements
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
Capital Improvements Program
FY01
FY01 - FY05 Planned Project Funding
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06
Total
4,000 4,000
14,000 14,000
9,000 9,000
2,000 2,000
5,000 5,000
34,000 34,000
655,000 899,000 1,554,000
32,000 30,000 30,000 92,000
730,000 1,084,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,814,000
4,971,000 5,675,000 907,000 100,000 11,653,000
251,000 44,000 295,000
667,000 667,000
1,417,000 1,033,000 2,275,000 2,275,000 7,000,000
44,000 44,000
200,000 768,000 40,000 1,008,000
22,000 22,000
172,000 91,000 67,000 67,000 67,000 464,000
225,000 225,000
600,000 600,000
1,205,000 2,655,000 564,000 4,424,000
575,000 575,000
6,182,000 8,006,000 2,500,000 16,688,000
255,000 9,100,000 9,355,000
470,000 470,000
900,000 900,000
1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000
3,255,000 1,072,000 0 1,108,000 500,000 5,935,000
550,000 550,000
15,375,000 23,299,000 18,566,000 6,269,000 5,830,000 3,064,000 72,403,000
Stormwater Planned Projects.xls/Plnd Pj Revs - HafMget 12l>Sep
9/27/01 5:38 PM