REVENUE SUFFICIENCY ANALYSIS AND FINANCIAL FORECAST - STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM - FY 2001-2006Citv of Clearwater
Stormwater Utilitv Svstem
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis and Financial Forecast
F�' 2001 through FY 2046
Prepared by
Burton & r��soeiaires, Inc.
Ociober, 2001
,
'
1
�
'
'
'
r
�
1
�
'
,
'
'
'
,
l__ 1
'
Citv of Clearwater
Water & Sewer° Utilitv Svstem
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis and Financial Forecast
FY 2001 through FY 24t16
Table of Contents
Introduction & System Overview ................................................................................ 1
Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 3
Base year Data and Baseline Forecast Assumptions .......................................................... 4
TheRate-setting Process .................................................................................................... 6
Current Rates and Rate Revenues ...................................................................................... 7
Other Revenues and Sources of Funds ............................................................................... 8
MajorSystem Costs ........................................................................................................... 9
Financial Mana.gement Plan Scenarios .............................................................................. 10
Appendix I- Full Sei of Schedules for Adopted Plan .......................... .. .... following page 12
Appendix II - Rate flrdinance ............................................................. .. ......following page 13
Append� III - Detailed Descriptions of Capital Improvements Projects.. ..following page 14
'
,
'
1
LJ
'
'
�III
J
�I
'
'
,
'
'
�
'
'
'
'
Cityo uf Clearwater
Stormwater Utilitv Svstem
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis and Financial Fo�ecast
FY 2001 through FY 2006
Introduction
This report presents the results of the rate study conducted for the City of Clearwater Stormwater
Utility System (the System) by Burton & Associates, Inc. The study was conducted during Fiscal
Year 2001 and consisted of a revenue suf�iciency analysis for the period FY 2001 through FY
2006 (the "forecast period") to determine the adequacy of current rates to fund the System's
projected costs during the forecast period and to provide alternative financial management plans
for consideration by the City. During the course of the study, the following process was followed
(all dates are in 2001):
• An initial analysis was completed in July, reviewed by staff, and revised based on staff
comments in August.
• An interactive session with staff was held on August 24.
• A presentation was made to City mana.gement on September 6, followed by an interactive
�ession. - -
• On September 25, an interactive session was held with staffto determine final
recommendations.
• A presentation of sta�s final recommendations and the final revenue sufficiency analysis was
made to City Management on October 2.
• Presentations were made to individual commissioners on October 3.
• On October 17, the study was presented to the City's Environmental Advisory Board (EAB).
• On October 24, a public presentation and worksho� was held.
• On October 29, the Ciiy Commission reviewed final recommendations and staf�s presentation
in workshop session.
• The ordinance increasing the stormwater rate in accordance with City management's
recommendation was adopted on first reading on November 1 and on final reading on
November 15.
This report documents the methodology and findings of the revenue suffciency analysis, reviews
the alternative financial management plans considered, and discusses the adopted plan in detail.
Svstem OuerUiew
The City oiClearwater implemented a stormwater utility fee in 1991 based upon a study
conducted by a consulting engineer. The study recommended a plan, subsequently adopted by the
, City of Clearwater Stormwater Utility Page 2
Revenue Sufficieney Analysis FY 2001- 2006 Final Report — October 2001
'
City, whereby fees are levied on the basis of equivalent residential units (ERU's). An ERU is
' defined as tlze amount of average impervious surface per single-family resideniial parcel in the
City. Ignoring slight dif�erences a,mong single-family parcels, the fee for a single-family residential
customer and for each individual unit in a multi-family complex is set at 1 ERU. The number of
' ERU's for a commercial customer is determined by dividing the amount af impervious surface on
the parcel by the amount of impervious surface defined to be in 1 ERU. Where drainage facilities
' that reduce stormwater runoffha.ve been constructed on a site, the number of billable ERU's for
that site are reduced in accordance with the mitigation provided. In FY 1997, the average number
of ERU's billed each month was approximately 96,000.
, Since implementation in 1991, the City has accounted for �ts stormwater utility operations in the
Starmwater Utility Enterprise Fund. The origina.l study that established the utility set rates at $3
' per ERU. Stormwater fees at the rate of $3 per ERU produced $3.45 million in fees during FIr
1997, with another $20,000 generated from miscellaneous sources of income. Operating
expenses requiring current resources (excluding depreciation} were $2.54 rivllion and transfers
' out to other funds were $4.58 million, resulting in a recurring net increase in working capital of
approximately $400,000. Historica�lys the System had funded its major capital requirements with
current resources, limpted to the amount of net cash flo�v available in each year. Debt financing
' has nat been used except for five-year lease purchase agreements for vehicles, and the System had
no significant long-term debt.i
' The need for substantia4 capi�ai imgrovem�nts prompted the 1998 rate st�.dy. For some tune, City�
management had been concerne� that the capital projects expendifures made possible by annual
net cash flow under the original rates was insufficient ta address significant and worsening
' fiooding and water quality problerns attributable to ina.dequacies in the stormwater rnanagement
inirastruciure. In r�spoa�se to thai c�ncern, Systern staff prepared a comprehensive survey af
' needed capital improvements. The total cost of �rojects in the survey exceeded $100 million.
After an intensive review and prioritization of this masier capital improvements program (CIF),
and m consideration �f the degree of mcrease ua rates that would be considered accep�able by the
' System's customers, the five-ye� CIP (F� 1999 through FY 2003) was reduced to $30 million.
The CIP became the most significant finar�cial fa�tor influencing the outcome of the 1998 reveriue
sufficienay analysis.
' The 1998 study (Burton & Associates, Inc., 1998) recarnmended adoption of a rate ir�crease of
33.3% on October 1, 1998 (FY 1999) and of 4.3°fo in each subsequent October 1 through
' October 1, 2002 (FY 2003). This increased the Starmwater rate to $4 per ERU in FY 1999, and
would have resulted in an increase to $4.73 per ERU in FIT 2003. These rate increases were
adopted by the City Commission in Ordinance N�. 63Q9-98 on August 6, 1998. They were
' expected to provide funding a$30 million capital improvements pragram over the next S years,
using debt financing through the issuance of 30-year Stormwater Utility revenue bonds, as well as
meeting the operations and m�intenanc� needs of the System.
'
, 1 From City of Clearwater Comprehenszve Annual Financial Report far Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1997.
' Burton & Associates
,
1
'
l. 1
'
'
�I
�I
'
�I
'
���
,
�
�''�
1
,
'
'
City of Clearwater Stormwater Utidity Page 3
Revenue Sujficiency Analysis FY 2t101 - 2006 Final Report — October 2001
During Fiscal Years 1999 and 2000, the Stormwater Utility staff, with the assistance of consulting
engineers, completed basin drainage studies for the entire City. In addition, current levels of
operational service were evaluated for adequacy. These efforts resulted in the identification of
additional needs for both operational and capital eapenditures. The capitai requirements during
Fiscal Years 2001-2006 were expected to total $72.4 million, an average of about $12 million per
year. This doubled the assumed $6 million per year assumed in the Past rate study. In addition,
the need for additional operating costs (in excess of normal inflationary increases to current
expenditures) was expected to reach $200,000 per year in FY 2002, and this increase was
expected to double to more than $400,040 per year by FY 2004. For this reason, a new rate
study was initiated in FY 2001.
The 2001 study, documented in this report, recommended adoption af a rate increase of 40.8% on
January l, 2002 (FY 2002) and of 16.8% on October 1, 2002 (FY 2003), followed by a 12%
increase October l, 2003 (FY 2004) and 8% increases on October 1, 2004 and 2005 (Fiscal Yeat�s
2005 and 2006). These recommended increases, which would result in an increase in the
Stormwater rate from $4.35 per ERU in FY 2001to $9.35 per ERU in FY, were adopted by the
City Commission in Ordinance No. 6855-01 on November 15, 2Q01. They are expected to
provide funding a$72.4 million capital improvements program over the 6 years inclusive of FY
2001 through FY 2006, using debt financing through the issuance of 30-year Stormwater Utility
revenue bonds, as well as meeting the operations and maintenance needs of the System during
that period.
Methodologv
The analysis was performed using an interaetive computer model that simulates the
financial dynamics of a stormwater utility, customized for the specif'ic financaal policies,
objectives, and economic environment of the City of Clearwater.
The model uses assumptions regarding such variables as expected customer growth;
automatic price index adjustments to rates; the effects of grovJth and economic inflation on
operating and maintenance costs; the timing of any rate increases and bond issues; average
earnings rate on invested cash balances in each year; debt issuance parameters such as costs of
issuance, term, and interest rate; desired levels of working capital reserves; and desired debt
service coverage ratios.
A five-year financial forecast is developed by applying these assumptions to beginning
fund balances, revenues, and expenses; other uses of fund such as transfers and capital
expenditures; and other sources af funds such as impact fees. in the caurse of the analysis, the
model tests for the su.�iciency of revenue to meet the following tests:
Burton & Associates
' City of Clearwater Stormwater Utility Page 4
Revenue Suffcciency Analysis FY 2001- 2006 Fina[ Report — October 2001
'
• Coverag� Net revenues (revenues less expenses} must be sufficient to meet the debt service
' coverage requirements defined in the bond coeenants (plus any discretionary buffer set by City
policy). _
� Totat fundin� Total sources of funds must be adequate to cover total uses of funds.
' • Reserve� Total sources of funds must be su�'icient to maintain required reserves and any
working capital reserve established by City policy.
'
�l
'
LJ
�
'-
l __J
f _1
If revenues axe insufficient to satisfy any of these criteria, the model solves for the
increase in rate revenue required to cure the insuff'iciency of funds. In addition, if after
meeting all of the above requirements funds are inadequate to fully fund the City's capital
improvements program, the model calculates the amount of debt %nancing needed and solves
for the related annual debt service requirements and any resulting rate increase. Through a
series of computational iterations, the optimal solution is found and the model balances.
To develap a iinancial management plan, the results of an initial analysis, designated
the "baseiine", are examined for consistency with the utility's objeetives. Aliernative analyses
("scenarios") are then developed using variations in assumptians that are within the control of
management, such as the timin� of capital projects, scheduled rate increases, and the timi.ng
and natwre of debt financing. From these aiternatives the most desirable fin.ancial management
pian is selected, determinu2g the revenue requirements for the forecast period.
d3ase Year Data and .Baseline Forecast Assr�a�zp�ions
Data for the FY 2001 base year was primarily drawn from the City's budget. However,
budget data was updated to the extent possibie based on actual experience and any revisions
made during the year.
' The sehedul.e below provides the baseline forecast assumptions used to initialize the
model. Assurnptions were developed based on the City's specific needs a.rid circumstances, our
experience with other utilities, and general economic conditions. All were discussed with staff.
,
'
'
,
'
'
Genergl economac assum�tions. In general, the assumptions are eonservative.
We assume no growth during the forecast period, assume rrioderate interest earnings raties, and
calculate debt service on new revenue bonds based upon a 6% interest rate, which is slightly
higher than the current market rate.
Debt raaaaacing assumptions. We have assumed thai the City will issue 30-year
revenue bonds to financed portians of the CLP that cannot be funded irom current cash flow.
Debt service requirements an this debt are assuaned to commence immediately upon issue (no
capitalized interest) and consist of level total annual payments of principal and interest. We
Burton & Associates
City of Clearwater Stormwater Utility
Revenue Sufficiency Analysrs FY 200I - 2006
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
S/G�IFI�ANT FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS
1
2
3 ADOPiED INCREASES IN RATES
4 CUST4NER GROWTH
7 %GROWTH RECOGNIZED IN E�ENSES
8 ANNUAL GROW7H COMPONENT
9 ANNUAL INFLATION COA�ONEN7
10 TOTAL APPLi� TO 0(PBiSES
11 OVE I
12qLL PAT b PAY-RELA7ED 7'D RlFLEGT MBtIT SYSTEM
13qDD FOR XEALTN lNSURANC! �
14ApD FOR PBiS10N CONTRtdtJT10N RATE INCREASE
15ADD FOR IN7�lNAi SERVICE CHAR6�
16 pp[C6NTA6E OF YEAI! ItkTE tIVCItRASE i5 �fBCT VE
17 p�C�{R(.� pp TPAR BilND Ft1NDS RVA1 LABLE
181N71�REST EARNINOS RATCS� �
19 REt�ENUE kCCOUNT
20 t998� BOND� PROCEEDS
21 NOTUSED
22 NOT USED
23 BOND FUNDS (NEW ISSUES)
24 DE6T ISSUANCE
25 DEBTSERVICERESERV@SURETY (%OFDEBTSERVICE)
26 DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND (YEARS OF DEBT SERVICE)
27 CAPITALIZED INT. TO BOND SINKINO FUND (YEARS OP IN7ERES'n
28 UNDERWRITERSDISCOUNT(%PAR)
29 OTHER COSTS OF ISSUANCE (X PAR)
30 COST OF BOND INSl1RANCE (°k PAR)
31 TERM OF ISSUE (YEJUtS)
32 ANNUAL 4N7ERESTRATE
33
39 CAPITAt 4MPROVETAERTS� FtlND�
3.00%
1.0�%
1. �%
4.5fl°k
30
6.OD%
Page 5
Final Report - Qcto6eF 2001
C[\1231DATA�CLWSTDI\11010'f. WK4 t1/01/20d1"
2001� 2002 2003 2004 2005 2008
FSTtMATE PRQ.tEC7'� PROJ�ECT@1� PRW�TID PROdECI'� PRWEGI'@D
4�.30% 4.30% 4.30 k - - -
N!A - - - -- -
N/A " - - - -
N/A - - -
N/A - - - -
N/A 3.00% 3.00°i6 3.00 % 3.00%
N/A 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
N!A 2_50% 2.50°� 2.50% 2.50%
N/A 19.50% 14.50% 9.50% 9.50%
N/A - - - -
NIA- 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50%
. . �.6 1 : -k� . . .
3.00°.6
2.50°.6
9.50%
1.50%
50.00% 100.00% 100.00%� 100:00% 100. W% 100.00 �
5.5Q% 5.50 % 5.00°h 4.5�0°% 4.00°6 4.00%
5.5Q°k 5.50°.6 5.00°.G 4.50% 4.0C1% 4.00%
5.50% b.5Q% 5.00% 4.50% 4.0095 4.0096
5.5Q % 5.50 % 5.OQ°fo 4.50% 4.06 k 4.00%
5.50°k 5.50% 5.00% 4.50°h 4.00 % 4.00%
IER SIGNIFiCANT ASSUMPTIONS:
2KING CAPITAL ABOVE RE�UIRED RESERVES (PERCENT OF O&M FJ�ENSE) 25.00%
�ue fw coverage indudes opeiating 2venue antl all irrterest eamings indutling 2sMCtea accounts.
oses for coverage includes aN curraM operating expenses, exciudes t2nsfers and capital outfay.
service for rate co�enant is cunent year actuaf debt service payrrents, excluding caprtaH�d rMerest.
service for pariEy test is rrsxirrumfuture annual debt service.
1fRED �VER4GE. Panty Test: 720 Rate Covenant: 1.15
=D DlSCi7ETI0NARY BUFFB7: .
4D.00% 40.00% 40.00% 4D.OD% 40�00%
assume that the debt service reserve fund requirement is grovided by a surety costing 3% of
annual debt service and that total issuance costs will equal about 2% of par.
�uidity assumptions. We dete�mined through discussions with staff that
unrestricted fund balances (working capital reserves) should be maintained at a level
equivalent to three months' operations and maintenance expense. This v�ould provide working
capital to operate the system if as much as three month's revenue were to be lost. This working
capital reserve also provides resources to mitigate or avoid rate increases resulting from
unanticipated increases in system costs (for example, unscheduled replacement of critical
components due to an operational failure}.
I�ebt service cot�erage reauirements. Debt service coverage requirements have
been set at the level required by the City's bond covenants. "Debt service coverage" refers to
the ratio between Net Revenues {NR} generated through system operations and the required
Debt Service Requirement (DSR) on revenue bonds (calculated as NR/DSR, and expressed as a
Burton & Associates
tl
�J
'
CI
C�
'
�
,
'
City of Clearwater Stormwater Utility I'age �
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis FY 20l/1- 2006 Final Report — October 2001
decimal fraction, e. g. 1.15). The debt service coverage requirements are part of the City's
contract with purchasers of its stormwater revenue bonds, and are included in the ordinances
adopted by the City Council when revenue bonds are issued. The ordinance governing a
particular bond issue is included in the Official Statement given to prospective purchasers of
the bonds; they therefore are construed to purchase the bonds based on their reliance on the
City's maintenance of sufficient revenue to meet the coverage tests. We emphasize that debt
service coverage is measured according to defnitions included in ttae City's contractual agreement
with its bandholders. It is an ariifact af the measurement process, and its Ualue as an objective
economic indicator depends upon the perspectiae of the user. There may be other measures
evaluated by the rating agencies and municipal bond insurance companies that will haue
importance}'or purposes of obtaining debt fnancing. There are two coverage tests required by
the City's band covenants, as follows.
O Rate couenant �applies in eaer� vear)
Net Revenue = 1.15 x[Debt 5ervice Requirement]
where Net �evenue = Gross Revenue -�perations and Maintenance Expense and
Qnerations and Maintenance Exbense exclud�ss any aperating transfers-out and
Gross ReUenue = GAAP revenue ? including interesi earnings on all.�'unds
' O Paratv Test jabblieabde in years when revenue bonds are issu�rl)
- Net Revenue = 1.20 x[Maximum Annual Future Debt Service Requirement]
where Net R�Uenue = PRIOR FISCA.L YEAR �Gross Revenue - Operations and
� Maintenanee Expense], adjusted far any planned rate increases and expeeted growth in the eurrent
Fiscal Year
and Gros�., euenue = GAAP revenue, including interesi earnirags on all funds
�
, The Rate-Setting Process
' Rates for government-owned starmwater util.ity utilities are set based upon the
requirement of the utility for funds to pay the costs of the system. �"hese costs fall into four
major categaries of expenditure:
'
'
'
,
i
• Operations and maintenance exnenses - the annually recurring cost of Iabor,
supplies, and minor capital items necessary for the day-to-day operation of the system and its
maintenance in goad working order
2 Revenue determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
BUI'tOil tQt ASSOCIatCS
City of Clearwater Stormwatet Utility Page 7
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis FY 2001- 2006 Final Report — October 2001
• Transfer pavments to other funds - annually recurring payments made to other funds
for services rendered, as a payment in lieu of taxes that would be required if the utility were
investor-owned, or as compensation for the citizens' risk of ownership
• Major capital exnenciitures - expenditures that (a) renew, replace or improve the
existing facilities of the system or (b) add new facilities that expand the capacity of the system.
These costs may be incurred either through current funding in cash or in payment of debt
service on loans used to iinance the expenditures. In the latter case, the system must also
generate suff'icient revenue to meet the debt service coverage requirements in its bond
covenants (see discussion above)
• Reserves - maintenance of reserves funds established by the bond covenants at the
required levels, and the establishment and maintenance of suff'icient unrestricted and
unreserved fund balances to meet working capital requirements and to reasonably provide for
unforeseen costs
To pay these costs, the utility has three major resources:
services
Rate revenue - receipts from charges to users for the provision of stormwater Utility
Miscellaneous reaenue - receipts from special charges for specif'ic services rendered,
other ongoing services such, late payment charges, and interest on investments
• Impact}'ees (system development charges) - fees charged to new customers to offset the
cost of their impact on the system. Impact fees are restricted to the payment of capital costs
incurred for the funding of facilities that increase the capacity of the system.
In its simplest form, rates for any given forecast year are set as follows:
Total annual cost requirements
Less: Miseellaneous revenue
Less: Impact fees used to gay canital costs
Equals: Total revenue requirements from rates
Diaided bv: Current revenuegenerated}'r-om rates
Equals: Proportionate (%) increase reauired
Current Rates and Rate Rer�enues
Stormwater Rates. During FY 2001, the System's stormwater utility fee of $4.35 per
ERU produced approximately $5 million per year, as reflected in the FY 2001 budget. Fees are
levied on the basis of equivalent residential units (ERU's). An ERU is defined as the amount of
average impervious surface per single-family residential parcel in the City. Ignoring slight
differences among single-family parcels, the fee for a single-family residential customer and for
each individual unit in a multi-family complex is set at 1 ERU. The number of ERU's for a
Barton & Associates
, City of Clearwater Stormwater Utiliry
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis FY 2001- 2006
�I
�
�
�J
Page 8
Fina[ Report — October Z001
commercial customer is determined by dividing the amount of impervious surface on the parcel by
the amount of impervious surface defined to be in 1 ERU. Where drainage facilities that reduce
stormwater runoff have been constructed on a site, the number of billable ERU's for that site are
reduced in accordance with the mitigation provided. In FY 2000, the average number of ERU's
billed each month was approximately 95,000.
Other Revenues and Sources of Funds
era Other operating revenue sources for the System are not signif'icant,
totaling $20,000 per year.
Interest Income. The System generates signiiicant annual intexest income,
, primarily from construction funds accumulated in the Capital Improvements Fund of the City.
FY 2001 interest is estimated at about $349,000, and the forecast indicates that this will increase
'
,
,
'
�
'
t
'
City of Clearwater, Florida
Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund
Revenue Account Ba/ance Available forAppropriation
September30, 2000 (a)
Recommended Rates
UNRES7RICTED CURRENT/LSSETS:
CASH ON HAND AND IN BANKS
EQUITY IN POOLED CASH / INVEST.
TOTAL RECEIVABLES, NET
DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS
DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS
INVENTORIES
PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES PAYABLE FROM UNRESTRICTED CURRENTASSETS:
ACCOUNTS/CONTRACTS PAYABLE
ACCRUED PAYROLL
ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES
DUE TO OTHER FUNDS
UNRES7RICTED WORKING CAPITAL
ADJU3TMENTS:
DEDUCT UNBILLED ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
OTHER DEDUCTIONS
ADD: WORKING CAPITAL CLASSIFIED AS RESTRICTED, BUTAVAILABLE FOR CtP
ADD: ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES
AVAILABLE FOR APPROPRIA710N
563,000
703,000
1,604,000
$2,870,000
232,000
24, 000
71, 000
000
322,000
71,000
000
(a) Account balances from balance sheet at September 30, 2000, and supplemental information from Public Works.
SOU�C@: BUf�Otl B.I�SSOC18t2S C:1123\DATA\CLWST0111 1 01 0 1.WK4 11/01f2001
Burton & Associates
�
III
J
�
�I
'
'
'
'
'
' -
'
'
,
'
,
'
City of Clearwater Stormwater Utility Page 9
Revenue Sufficieney Analysis FY 2D01 - 2006 Final Report — October 2001
to almost $900,000 in FY 2003, thereafter declining to $100,000 in FY 2006 as the capital
improvements program in eompleted and construction funds are expended.
Fund Balances at the Be�inning oJ' the Period. Fund balances available for
appropriation at the beginning of the period were $2.5 million, defined as the System's current
assets, less current liabilities, on September 30, 2000 (beginning of FY 2001), adjusted as shown
below.
Of this $2.5 million, $750,000 was held in reserve for potential liabilities regarding to court
cases. There was an additional $5.4 million available from the i999 revenue bond issue, use of
which is restricted to funding of capital projects.
Maior Svstetra Costs During tlae Forecast Period
Dberations and Maintenance (O<l,� Expenses. �&M expenses represent the
annually recurring cost of labor, materials and supplies, and minor capital items required to
operate the system and maintain the level of service demandeci. O&M expenses are expected to
total approximately $3.7 million in FY 2001.
During the forecast period after F'i' 2000, it was assumed that in general O&M expenses
will grow at an inflation rate of 3°!o annually. In addition, it was�ssumed that pay and pa�-
related benefits would increase by an additional 2.5 %(total of 5.5 %) annually to reflect the
City's merit pay system. Health insurance costs were estimated to increase by an additional
19.5% in 2002, 14.5°!o in 2003, and 9.5°fo each year fa� 2004, 2005 and 2006, based on the City's past
experience as reflected in current risk management estimates. Internal Service Fund cha�ges
are expected to increase 1.5% per year above inflation (total of 4.5%). In total, application of
these rates of increase to the appropriate expenditure items results in an average annual
ccmpound rate inerease in total O&M expenses of 4.9% during the forecast period.
Debt Service. Debt service on existing revenue bonds in FY 2001 was $517,000 and
remains appraximately level throughout the forecast period. In subsequent years, new debt
iinancing is amortized thraugh level payments over thirty years as described in the section
above describing the economic assumptions used in the forecast. Assuming the issuance of
bonds in FY 2002 , 2004, and 2006, annual debt seruice on new issues increases from $1.7 million
in FY 20Q2 to $4 million in FY 2006, thus increasing total debt service from $517,000 to $4.5
million during the forecast period.
Traxcs ers. Operaiing transfers to the General Fund are calculated, in accordance
' with City policy, as 4.5°l0 of total revenue from two years prior. The transfer increases from
$156,000 annually at the beginning of the �eriod to $369,000 in FY 2006.
'
' Burtan & Associates
'
u
'
�
City of Clearwater Stormwater Utility Page 10
Revenue Su, jficieney Analysis FY 2Q01- 2006 Final Report — October 2041
Capital Exnenditures The system's c,�.pital improvements program (CIP) for the
period FY 2001-2006, totaling $72.4 million, is shown on the following page.
Financiat Management Plan Scenarios
In consultation with City management and staff during the interactive sessions and through
' subsequent discussions with staff, a large number oi%riancial management plan scenarios were
discussed. These were eventually narrowed to three alternatives, as shown in the graphic
below.
'
'
'
'
�
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
L. J
All scenarios provide sufficient revenue to meet all projected System cost requirements during
the forecast period, including the capital improvements program.
01 4.3%
02 36.4%
03 4.3%
04 29.1%
05 3.1 °�
Q6 13.1°k
Total 923.49�0
o� a,a°vo
Q2 40.8%
03 16.8%
04 72.U% '' E
05 8.0°k
O6 8.0%
Totai 124.1°k
�
3ASEl.INE
atural Rate
3
•
Stronger
2
�
EVELtZEi
r e�VOltl �f81
spikes"
01
az
03
04
05
0&
Total
4.3°k
36.6°k
17.9%
13.0°k
8.0%
8.0%
121.4%
Scenario 1— Increase ra,�es on when cznd � needed, maantain minimum debi service
�overage. Often referred to as a natural rate plan, this scenario allows the rate model to
calcuiate "just in time" rate increases based on minirraum financial requirements. It has the
disadvantage of large "rate spikes" in sor�2e years, with rela�ively low increases in athers. In
addition, relatively minor unfavorable variances from assumed financial parameters could
result in a need for higher rate increases than those proj�eted.
Burton & Associates
' City of Clearwater Stormwater Utility Page 11
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis FY 2001- 2006 Final Report — October 2001
'
Scenario 2— Levelized rate increases This scenaria eliminates, as much as possible, wide
' swings in the magnitude of rate increases from year to year. It still achieves only minimum
debt service coverage levels.
' Srpnn.rio 3— Recom�nended rate increases resulting in hi�her coveru�e This scenario
minimizes rate swings from year to year, but slightly increases the total rate change during the
, period in order to provide a"margin of safety" above minimum debt service coverage levels.
Conclusion
' After careful review by staff and City management, presentation to the City
' Commission, and public discussion in a large number of forums, the recommended Scenario 3
was determined to be in the best interests of the City and its Stormwater Utility.
' Accordingly, annual increases for the entire forecast period were adopted by the City
Council in November, 2001.
' A full set of schedules for the analysis supporting ihe adopted %nanciai management
plan is ulcluded in the report as Appendix I.
' -
'
J
ll
'
�
C
'
'
' Burton & Associates
City of Cdearwater Stormwater Utility
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis FY 200I - 2006
•. r � • �
Page 12
Final Report — October 2001
' � / ' � / t / _ ' / / / � f / /
'/ / • �' �, � /
Burton & Associates
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Annual Rate fncrease
15,00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
- -------- �Adopted
------ --- ❑Additional
�001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Fiscal Year
Unrestricted Balances I
� — 3.0 Mos. O&M
$1,5Q0-
H
'�
� $�I,000
N
3
� $500
H
�O
2001 200� 2003 2004 2005 2006
End of Fiscal Year
City of Clearwater, Florida
FINAL PLAN
�ao
$35
��o
_ �25
� $20
��
.�
' � S15
$10
$5
$0
�
Net Bond Proceeds
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Fiscal Year
Stormwater Utility
Burton 8� �
03/06/2002
Page 1 of 1
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SCHEDULE 1
S"I�ORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
Forecast of Finan�cial Results of Operations
with Computafion of Debt Service Coverage
lN ACCORDANCE WlTH BOND COVEfVANTS SHE SCHEDULE 2, "FORECAST OF SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS", FOR MORE DETAIL
FINAL PLAN 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2008
1
2
3
4
5
s
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
I'IC RATE INCREASES
IAL RATE INCREASES REQUIRED
AGE OF YEAR RATE ADDITIONAL INCREASE IS EFFECTIVE
> RATE REVENUE INCREASE DUE TO CUSTOMER GROWTH
t......� . .. iu �.uv ro °-' '-' "..
---- 35.00°% 12.00% 12.00% 8.00% 8.00°/a
700.00% 75.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.OA%
N/A .._ ---- ---- ----
F��V�N_Sl_� AVAILABLE FOR DE$_T 5��2V1C�
RATE REVENUES $4,980,000 $6,557,000 $8,191,000 $9,174,000 $9,908,000 $10,701,000
OTHER OPERATING REVENUES $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
__ INTEREST INCOME, OPERATING FUND _ _ _ $349,OQ0 $477,000 $869,000 $388,000 $248,000 $104,000
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES $5,349,000 $7,054,000 $9,080,000 $9,582,000 $10,176,000 $10,825,000
OPERATING EXPENSES ____ _ _ _____ $3,723,000 $4,191,000 �4,426,000 $4,734,000 $4,945,000 $5,183,000
NET REVENUES, OPERATING FUND $1,626,000 $2,863,000 $4,654,000 $4,848,000 $5,231,000 $5,642,000
�I�T ��RV�E REQUIREMPNTS
CURRENT DEBT SERVICE FOR RATE COVENANT $517,000 $2,223,000 $2,223,000 $3,892,000 $3,891,000 $4,490,000
MAXIMUM FUTURE DEBT SERVICE FOR PARITY TEST $521,000 $2,226,000 $2,226,000 $3,896,000 $3,896,000 $4,495,000
QEBT SERVlC� �VERAGE MINIMUM ? —
Required in each ye�r �
RATE COVENANT 1.15 3.15 1.29 2.09 1.25 1.34 1.26
F?equired only in ysars when additiona/ senior lien revenue bonds are issued.
PARITYTEST------ — ------- --,— 1.20 ----=_. _-----N/A -- --1,29 ___ N/A 1.24 ___ N!A ---- 1.26
RECONCiUATION TO_TOTAL SOURCES AND USES OFFUNDS
NET REVENUES IN THE OPERATING FUND, RESTATED $1,626,000 $2,863,000 $4,654,000 $4,848,000 $5,231,000 $5,642,000
SOURCES OF FUNDS NOT INCLUDED IN COVERAGE 1,350,000 7,307,000 862,000 55,000 55,000 55,000
USES OF FUNDS.NOT INCLUDED IN COVERAGE ___ __ _ �__ (4 684 OOOZ_�10,035,000)_ (5,845,000) (4 817,000) �5,341,000) t5,637,000)
SOURCES OVER (UNDER) USES, REVENUE ACCOUNT (1,708,000) 135,000
(329,000) 86,000 (55,000) 60,000
SOURCES OVER �UNDER) USES, OTHER ACCOUNTS 3,942,000 _ 7,829,000 {856,000) _ 8,325,00�� (2,618,000) (1,747,000)
------ --- -- ------ -- -
TOTAL SOURCES OVER (UNDER) USES 2,234,000 7,964,000 (1,185,000) (8,239,000) (2,673,000) (1,687,000)
r----
TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES_ ____ _ _ _ __ _ FY 1999 i $7,92?,000 __$10,156,000 _ $18,120,000 $16,935,000 $8,696,000 $6,023,000
TOTAL ENDING BALANCES " __�_$7,922, 00 0 i $10,156,000 $18,120,000 $16,935,000 $8,696,000 $6,023,000 $4,336,000
' SEE SCHEDULE 2 FOR COMPOSITION OF ENDING BALANCES �— — — -- --
SOURCE: BURTQN � ASSOCIATES 03/06/2002
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SCFiEDULE 2
STORMWATBR UTILITY SYSTEM
Forecast of Sources and (Ises of Funds
QNA WORK/NG CAP/TAL BAS/S NOTES REFER TO SCHEDULE 3, "NOTES TO FORECAST OF SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS"
SEE SCHE�ULE 4 FOR SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT FORECAST ASSUMATIONS
FINAL PLAN 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
_ NQTE$ ESTIMATE PRO,lECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJfCTED
SOURCES OF FUNDS:
_-
REV�NUE ACCOUNT
RATE REVENUES
OTHER OPERATING REVENUES
INTEREST INCOME
TRANSFERFROM GENERALFUND
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
17
�z
13
i4
15
16
17
18
19
zo
21
az
as
2k
26
26
27
28
29
ao
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
1998 BOND PROCEEDS
BOND PROCEEDS
IPITEREST EARNWGS _
rorac
NEW DEBT FINANCING
INTERIM FINANCING PROCEEDS
BQND PROCEEDS
INTEREST EARNINGS ON BOND PROCEEDS
� $4,980,000 $6,557,000 $8,191,000
$20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Sched.10 $349,000 $477,000 $869,000
B $5b,000 $55,000 $55,000
$14,361,000 $9,942,000
$9,174,0(30
$20,000
$388,000
$55,000
$9,637,000
148,000 -
148.000 ------- -__ ---- ---
$7,029,000 ----
---- $22,687,000
$9,908,000 $10,701,000
$20,000 $20,000
$248,000' $104,000
$55,000 $55,OOQ
1Q,231,000 $10,880,000
$t6,354,000 --- $5,332,040 ----
---- $22,226,000 ---- $7,978,000
_ _ __ _ I w.Hau. �v 1_ ••" +➢Y1.7,VVV �"' YILb,UUV --- .�5Z,0{10
TOTAL $7,029,000 $23,106,000 $16,354,000 $22,355,000 $5,332,000 $8,030,000
CAPITAL IMPFtOVEMEN7S FUND (CIF) TRANSFERS-IN $15,375 000 $23,299 000 $18 566 000 $6 269 000 $5 830 000 $3 064 000
TOTAL. SOURCES OF FUNQS $29,251,000 $60,766,000 $44,862,000 $38,281,000 $21,393,000 $21,974,000
USES OF FUNDS:
REVENUE ACCOUNT �
�PERATING EXPENSES E $3,723,000 $4,191,000 $4,426,000 $4,734,000 $4,945,000 $5,183,000
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND F $156,000 $225,000 $225,000 $235,000 $330,UOp $389,000
PAYMENT OF PCSB IWBtLfTY G $750,OQ0 --- --- __- ___ ____
CAPffAL DUTIAY H $76,000 $89,000 $89,000 $89,000 $89,000 $89,000
TRANSFER TO GARAGE FUND $32,000 $25,000 --- ___ ___ ___
LEASE PAYMENTS - EQUIPMENT i $143,000 $251,0�0 $298,000 $333,000 $323,000 $323,000
SENIOR LIEN DEBT SERVICE J $517,000 $2,223,000 $2,223,000 $3,892,000 $3,88'l,000 $4,490,000
TRANSFER TO CIF K $2,915,000 $7,222,000 $2,611,OD0 $268,000 $603,000 $366,000
INTEREST ON INTERIM FINANCING Scbed.l0 $95.000 -- $399.000 --- $105 004 ---
TRANSFER TA CIF FROM 1998 BOND PROCEEDS/INTERE5T
TRANSFER TO CIF FROM NEVY BOND PROCEEDSlINTEREST
LIQUIDATION OF INTERIM FINANCING FROM NEW BONDS
$S,A07,000 $14,226,OOQ $10,271,000
$5,526,000 ---- ---
$6,H34,Q00 $16,077,000 $15,955,000
--- � $7,029,000 ---
$9,551,000 $10,286,000 $10,82Q,000
$6,001,000 $5,227,OOQ $2,698,000
$16,354,000 --- $5,332,000
$14,594,000 $8,553,000 $4.911.000
$Qt�RCE� pV��UNDERI USES OF FU� '
REVENUE ACCOUNT ($1,708,000) $135,000 ($329,000) $86,000
1999 BOND PRQCEEDS ($5,378,000) ___ ___ �^ ($55,000) $60,000
NEW DEBT FINANCING $95,000 ---- $399,000 ---- $105,000 -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND $9.225.000 $7.829 D00 ($7 255 000) ($8 325 000) ($2 723 000) ($1 747 000)
TOTAL SOURCES OVER (UNDER) USES OF FUNDS $2,234,000 $7,964,000 ($1,185,000) ($8,239,000) ($2,673,000) ($1,687,000)
TOTALBEGlNN/NGBAI�INCES NOTE 2000 $7,922,000 $10,156,000 __$18,120,000 $16,935,000 $8,696,000 $8,023,000
----,
- ----- ---- ---- - -
----- -
TOTAL ENDING BALANCES L $7,922,000 $10.156.000 $18.120.000 �16.935.000 �s_ass o00 �R n�s nnn �e aaR nnn
1999 BOND PROCEEDS
FUNDS IN CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENTS FUND
NEW BOND FUNDS (NEGATNE INDICATES INTERIM FINANCING)
RESERVE FOR PCSB LIABILITY *
UNRESERVED, UNRES7RICTED, AND UNDESIGNATED '
* See Schedule 9 for beginning Revenue Account
SOURCE: BURTqN BASSOCIATES
$5,378,000
; $750,OOa
_� �sos,aoo
$$9t,000
of $2,544,000
$9,225,000 $17,054,000 $15,799,000 $7,474,000 $4,751,000 $3,004,000
_ _$931,000 __$1,066,000__ $1,136,000 $1,222,000 $1,272,000 $1,332,000
--- --- ---- --- ---- ----
--- ---- - ---.__-- - -- ---- _----
avaitable for appropriation.
03/O6/2002
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEA,RWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTBM
AQ _ RA7E REVENUES
RATE REVENUES FROM PRIOR YEAR
ESTIMATED GRQWTH
REVENUE FRQM GROW�}i -----
SUBTOTAL ` -
PRIOR YERR AODffIONAL RATE INCREASE
REVENUE PROVIDED 8Y PRIOR YEAR RATE INCREA
SUB70TAl -
AD P IN EA�€IJi—�UR E fiFEA�---
REVENUE PROVIDED BYADOPTED RATE INCREASE
�
0
_�
SCHEDULE3
a,ysu oou i6,557,000 _S8L91,000 $9,174,000 39,9a8,000
$4,775,000 54,980,000 y5,194,000 $7,314,000 $8,192,000
N/A -- _.. __ �
34,775,000 $4,980,000 55,194,000 57,314,000 $8,182,000
-- 0.00% 35.00% 12.00% 12.00%
- $1,818,000 $878,000 $983,000
$4,775,000 $4,980,000 $7,012,000 $8,192,000 $9,175,000
4. 0% 3a°o� 4.30° _- — __—
5205,000 $214,000 $302,000 -- ___
$a,980;�6�--$b,73d;bti�--�7,31a;adtl—=_ -$8;��2;piS�—$g;175�p�b
$R,980,000 $5,194,000 $7,314,000 $8,192,000 $9,175,000
_0.00°r6 35.00°/ 12.0096 12.00% 8.00%
$0 $1,817,900 $677,680 $983,040 y73A,000
_ 100.00% ___ 75.00% 100.00% 10�.00 % 100.00%
— R1 3R3 M)f1 4a7R nnn c000 nnn --� w��. ......
CARRIED FORWARD FRQM ORIGINAL UTILlTY RATE STUDY,' TRANSFER IS FOR UNDERGROUND TANK REMOVAUREPLACEMENT.
1999 BOND PRQCEEOS, NET OF lSSUANCE CQSTS, DEPOSITED TO CONSTRUCTION FUNQ PER OFFICIAL STATEMENT.
5EE NOTE J BELOW, WNICH COVERS ALL SENIOR LlEN DEBT SERVICE ITEh9S.
$9,175,000
$9,175,000
8.00%
$734,000
$9,909,000
$�b�,6d6
100.
Page 1 of 4
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLE.ARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
SCHEDULE3
COST
�E OPERATING EXPENSES ___ ceret�R ____ 53,723,000 • ad,191,000 54,426,000 54,734,000 54,945,000 55,183,000
DIVISION R4�QGETS
ENGINEERING / WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 13B5 $547,000 $506,000 $533,000 $560,000 $589,000 $675,000
ENGINEERING ( ENVIRONMEN7AL REGULATORY 1366 --- --- ___ � ___ � ___
PUBLIC WORKS/S70RMWATER UTI�ITY 2080 $3,176,000 $3,554,000 $3,724,000 $3,904,000 $4,093,000 $4,292,000
SUBTOTAL $3,723,000 $4,060,000 $4,257,000 $4,464,OQ0 $4,882,000 $4,911,000
�
�
0
0
OTH�
LEASE/PURCHASE
Grade-All Excavator & Well PUHeadars
Lap Top Computers
Pawer Screener
N Truck and Camera
Power Screener upgrade _ J
Research Envlronmentalist (Pos Upgrade)
Researc� Environmantalist (New)
Senior Accountant
Major Medical (3,800 per empl in FY02)
Pubiic Svc Tech III (pos upgrade)
Public Svc Tech 111(pos upgrade)
Public Svc Tech III (pos upgrade)
Public Svcs Trainer {pos upgrade)
Public Svc Tech III (pos upgrade)
Public Svc Tech III (pos upgrede)
Equfpment Related Maintenance Costs (� 15°h of equipment cost per year)
Revised Administrative Service Charges
$54,000
$97,000
$2,000
$30,000
$41,000
$8,000
$2,000
$2,000
$2,000
$2,000
$42,OOD
$54,000
$17,000
$47,000
$2,000
$32,000
$43,000
$9,000
$2,000
$2,000
sa,000
$2,000
$75,000
$54,000
a��,000
$47,000
535,000
$2,000
$33,000
$46,000
$10,000
$2,000
$2,000
sz,000
$2,000
$z,ono
$2,000
$98,040
$54,000
$47,000
$35,000
$7,000
$3,000
535,000
$48,000
$11,000
$2,000
$2.000
s2,oao
$2,000
$z,000
$2,000
$102,D00
$54,000
$47,000
$35,000
$7,000
$3,000
$37,000
$51,000
$12,000
$2,000
$2,000
sz,000
$2,000
sz,000
$2,000
$102,000
PRIOR YEAR TRANSFER $150,000
CURRENT YEAR RATE INCREASE 4.30%
IMPLIED ADORIONAL TRANSFER REQUIRED �6.000
TRANSFER PERCENTAGE _ 4.50%
CURRENT YEAR TRANSFER � $225 000
Y U Y A , 00,0 , 14,000 , 3, 0 8, 1,Q
TRANSFERPERCENTAGE_ __ 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50%
PAYMENT OF PlNELLAS COUNTY SCHOOI BOARD LIABIUTY FOR FEES COLtECTED !N ERROR IS ASSUMED TO NAVE OCCURRED !N FY 2000.
CAPITAL OUTLAY fS PER FY 2001 BUDGET, AND IS ASSUMED TO BE THE SAME IN ALL OTNER YEARS, INCLUDlNG THE PRJOR YEAR (FY2000).
LEASE PAYMENTS ON EQUIPMENT IS PER FY 2001 BUDGET, AND !S ASSUAAED TO BE THE SAME IN ALL OTHER YEARS, INCLUDING THE PRIOR YEAR (FY2000).
Page 2 of 4
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SCHEDULE 3
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
�_ SENIOR LIfN DEBT SERVICE _ �_ SCHED. 2___ a517,000 52,223,000 52,223,000 53,892 000 S3 $81000 54 490 000
EXISTING DEBT $ERVICE' ___ __ .__ __. , __
FY 1999 REVENUE BONDS $517,000 $518,000 $518,000 $517,0�0 $516,000 $516,000
DEBT SERVICE FOR NEW tSS� '_ __ � � � . ._
REDUCTION FOR PARTIAL YEAR � ___ �_ ,__ _ .�
REDUCTION FOR CAPITRLIZED INTEREST _-- .__ �_ .___ __ M_
__ GROSS DEBT SERViCE REQUIREMENT FOR NEW ISSUES ___�� __ – 1,705,000 1,705,000 3,375,000 3,375,000 3,974,OOD
..
SENIOR LIEN DEBT SERVICE
— ---
____ _ _ __. ____5517,000 $2,223,000 ;2,223,000 53,892,000 53,897,000 __ 54,490,000
�QVERAG,�l��Ji4 41�li[A��
DEBT SERVICE FOR RATE COVENANT {CURRENT REQUIREMENTS)
MAXIMUM FUTURE DEBT SERVICE ON EXISTING ISSUES
(a) CALCULATION OF ANNUA�ZED qEBT SERVBCE FOR NEW I$SllE� � — — -
PERCENTAGE OF YEAR @OND FUNIIS AVAILABLE: 50.00°% 100.0036 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100,00 %
sounc€s_�uNDS;
7ERM OF ISSUE (YEARS) 30 ,
ESTIMATED PRItdCiPAI AMOUNT -- 23 464 000 - $22 987 000 $8 252 000
PROJECTS FUNDEDlINTERIM FINANCING REFUNDED (b) --- $22,687,000 -- $22,228,000 --- $7,978,000
DEBTSERVICE RESERYE SURETY (�, OF DEBTSERVICE) r 3.00% -- � 61,000 ---- 50,000 -- 1B4O00
DEBT 5ERVICE RESERVE FUND jYEARS OF DEBT SERVICE) -- -_- � ._. __ �_
GRPITALIZED INT. TO BOND SINKING FUND (YEARS OF �NTERES� .� __ � �_ �. _ .
UNDERWRITERS DISCOUNT (°r6 PAR) 1.00°1 I -- 235,000 --- 230,000 — 83,000
OTHER COSTS OF ISSUANCE (% PAR) 1.00% � --- 235,000 -- 230,000 — 83,000
COST OF BOtdD iNSURANCE % PAR 0.3096 — 256 000 251 000 9p OOp
�ryVw- uC�� �CRV,yG 1�"R",y�� _ ( 8.00% --- 51.705.OD0 -- 27•670.000 .� ROOMM
UIVFUNDED CAPfTAL PROJECTS FROM ClP" REPRESENTS THE REQU/RED DEPOS/T TO CONSTRUCTION FUNDS AFTER CASH-FUNDING
THE ClP TO THE EXTENT POS518LE AND AFTER DEDUCTlNG fNTEREST EARNlNGS ON CONSTRUCTION FUMDS.
MULTlPLE ANNUAL FUND/NG REQU/REMENTS MAYBE "BUNDLED" /NTO SAYGLE HOND ISSUE3 TO M/NIM/ZE ISSUANCE COSTS.
(b) SUMMARY OF CAAITAL FUNDING SOURCES
'fOTAL TRANSFERS TO CAPITAI IMPROVEMENTS FUND
FUNDED FROM NET REVENUES AFTER PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE
FUNDED FROM 1999 BOND FUNDS AND INTEREST
MAY 8E SLIGNT DlFFERENCES DUE TO ROUNDlNG.
E15,375,000
(2,915,000)
(5,528,000)
$23,299,000 $18,566,000 $6,269,000 $5,830,000 $3,064,000
(7,222,000) (2,611,000) (268,000) (603,000) (366,000)
i
Page 3 of 4
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � r �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
L�J
(a)
(b)
(t}
(d)
(e)
�
G4i4LCULATIQN�?�F��1(D$ �VA 8L� �D�E�OR CAPITAL ��$
SCHEDULE 3
EUNOS WITN ZH�lLISHEST LF�/F,�F RESTF3t�LIQ�AR� USED FIR�T
CAPITAL 7RANSFERS TD BE FUNDED DURING THE YEAR __ $15,375,000 _$23,299,000 $18,566,000 _ $6,269,000 $5,830,000 $3,D64,000
1$88 BOND PROCEEDS •
BEGINNING BALANCES $5,378,�00 --- -� � .__
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS 148,000 --- __ __ � �
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS BEFORE CAPITAL TRANSFERS (DEBT SERVICE) — ___ _� � __
AVAILABLE P R RESERVES AND CAPITAL TRANSF�RS $5,@26,000 -- —� __ --
tESS: RESERVES flTHER THAN CAPITAL __ __ __ � _ �
BEGINNING BAIANCES
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUNpS
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS BEFORE
$5,526,000
$9,849,000 $23,299,00� $18,568,000
$2,544,000 $838,000 $871,000
6,699,OOD 14,361,OQ0 9,942,000
�6,289,000 $5,830,000
$642,000 $728,000
9,637,000 10,231,D00
�
$6�3,000
10,880,000
BEGINNING BALANCES �lfA $95,000 $7,124,000 $7,523,000 $23,877,000 $23,952,000
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS 7,029,000 23,106,000 18,354,000 22,355,000 5,332,000 8,030,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS BEFORE CAPITAL TRANSFERS
AVAILABLE FOR RESERVES AND CAPITAL TRANSFERS $7,029,000 $23,201,000 $23,478,000 $29,878,000 $29,209,000 $32,012,000
LESS: RESERVES OTHER THAN CAPITAL ___ �__ __ �_ � .�
BEGINNING BAI.ANCES $7,922,000 $931,000 $8,095,000 $8,165,000 $24,605,000 $24,655,000
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS $13,876,000 $37,467,000 $26,296,400 $31,992,000 $15,563,OQ0 $18,910,U00
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS BEFORE CAPITAL TRANSFERS __�$5,492,000) ($�,004,000) ($7 680 000) y9,( 283 000) ($9 883,000) ($10,454,000)
AVAILABLE FOR RESERVES AND CAPITAL TRANSFERS $16,306,000 $31,394,000 $26,731,000 $30,874,000 $3Q485,000 533,t11,000
USED FOR CAPiTAI TRANSFERS ($15,375 000) ($23 299 000) (a18 568 000) ($6 289 D001 ($5 830 000) {$3 064,000)
NDI td�E$ P P APITAL � P VEM��S FU�D $ 3,0 8,09 ,000 , 65,0 24, 0,000 $2-4�, �5,�40— �3b,64�,660
LESS: RESERVES OTHER THAN CAPITAL `($931,000) ) ($1,222,000) ($1,272,000) ($1,332,000)
{$1,068,000) ($1,136,000
SURPLU (DEFICIT) CAR IED FOR ARD --- $7,029,000 $7,029,000 E23,383,000 $23,383,000 $28,715,000
COMP03_II_f_�N9F�N.DJ�LANCE� E�C�EpT C�F
1999 BOND PROCEEDS _.._ _._ __ �
NEW BOND FUNDS (NEGATIVE INDICATES INTERIM FINANCING) --- __. .� � � �
RESERVE FOR PCSB LIABILITY' __ __ ____ _ ~
DESIGNA"FED FOR WORKING CAPITAL __ i $931,000 $1,066,000 $1,136,000 $1,222,000 $1,272,000 $1,332,000
UNRESERVED, UNRESTRICTED, AND UNDESIGNATED — --- --
ENDING REVENUE ACCOUNTBALANCES c+d+e $931,000 $1,066,000 $1,136,000 57,222,000 $1,272,000 $1,332,UQ0
ENDINGTOTALBALANCES,EXCEPTCIF a+b+c+d+e $931,000 $1,088,000 $1,136,000 $1,222,000 $1,272,000 �1,332,000
ADD: ENDING CIF BALANCES _______ __ _ 9,225,�00 17,054,000 15,799,000 7,474.000 4.751.00o a nne nnn
PER SCHEDUI.E 2
Page 4 of 4
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEAR.WATER, FLO�ZIDA
STORMWA"IER U7TLITY SYSTEM
SIGN/FICANT F4RECAST ASSUMPT/O1VS
FINAL PLAN
SOURCE: BUF
C:1123�DATA\CLW ST011REPORT1110101 EX.W K4
SCHEDULE 4
03106I2002
ESTiMATE _ PROJECTED _ PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
1
2 - - •
3 ADOPTED INGREASES IN RATE3 q.30% 4.30% 4.30% - .- _
4 CUSTOMER GROWTH N/A __ _
5 ANHUAL INCREA ES APP�IEQ TO Mf$CELLANEOUS REVENUE$ N!A
6_A_NNUAL INCREAgES APPI.IED TO GPERATIN6 EXPlNSE8:
7 °hGROWTH RECOGNIZED W EXPENSES N!A -- - __ _ ..
8 ANNUAL GROWTH COMPONENT �/q r ------- _ _ __ -- '
9 AfdNUAL INFLATION COMPONENT N/A 3.00% 3.009'0 3.00% 3.00% 3.00°k
10 TOTA�. APPLIL'D TO EXPENSES NlA 3.00% 3.0096 3.00°/a 3.00% 3.00%
11 ADDITfONA_L_lNCR�_q,�^ES ABOVE INFLAT! N:
12 ALL PAY 8 PAY-R�L.AT@� TO REFLBCT MlRIT 8Y3TBM N1A 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50°k
13 ADD FOR HEALTH INSU�tANCE ' N!A 19.50% 14.50°k 9.50°k 9.50% 9.59%
14 ADD FOR PBNSION CONTRIQUTION RATE INCRRASE N!A - - _ _ _
1S ADD FOR INTERN�IL 8EIiVICE CHAR6E3 N!A 1 50°k 1 5p% 1 50°.0 1 50% 1 50%
16 PERCENTA�E OF Y�AR ItATE INCREA8E f8 EFF@CTIVE 1DOA0°!o 75A�9'o 100.00°� 100.00% 100.00°h 100.OD%
17 PERC�NTAGE OF YEAR BOND FUNDS AVAILABLE: ' S0.00°/a 100.Q0°h 100.00% 900.00% 100.00% 100.00°h
f8 INTEREST �.'ARNIWGS RATEg:
19 REVEI�UE ACCOUNT 5.5U% 5.5Q°k 5.0095 4.50°fo 4.00% 4.00%
2D 1998 BOND PROCEEDS 5.50% 5.50% 5.0�°fo 4.50% 4.00% 4.00%
21 NOT USED 5.50% 5,50% 5.00°l0 4.50% 4.00% 4.00%
22 NOT USED 5.5Q9'o 5.50% 5.00% 4.50°h 4.00% 4.00%
23 �OND �UNDS NEW ISSUES 5.50% 5.50% 5.00°k 4.50°h 4.00°!0 4.00%
24 DEBT ISSUANCE: OTHER S16NIFICANT A$SUMPTIONB:
25 �EBT SERYICE RESERVE SURETY (% OF DEBT SERVICE) 3.00% W4RKING CAPITAL ABOVE REQUIRED RESERVES (PERCENT OF O&M EXPENSE) 25.00%
26 DEBT SE#tVIGE RESERYE FUND (YEARS OF DEBt SERVICE) --
27 CAPITALIZED INT. TO BOND SINKlNG PUND (YEARS OF INTEREST) -
------- ----- - - ---- --- ------
28 UNDERWRITER$ DISCOUNT (% PAR� 1.00% Revenue for coverege incfudes operaGng revenue and all inte�est eamings inCluding restnated accounts.
29 OTHER GOSTS OF iSSUANCE (% PAR) 1.00% Expenses for coverage indudes a�f current operafing expenses, excludes transfers and capital outlay.
30 COST OP BONU INSURANCE (°� PAR) 0.50�o De6t servlce for rate cove�ant is current year acfual debt service payments, excluding capitatized interest.
31 YERM OP ISSUE (YEARS) 30 Debt senrres for parity test is maximum future annua/ debt servlce.
32 ANNUAI INTEREST RATE 6.00�o REQUIRED COVERAGE: Parity Tesl: 1.20 Rate Covenant: f 1.15
3� DDED DISCRETIONARY 8 UFFER: II-- --�
34 FINANC/NG PARAMETER3 5!/BJECT TO ClTY POLlCYAT TIME OF /SSUE TOTAL COVBRAGE TARGET 1.20 __� I 1.15 ' i
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
SCHEDULE 5
CALCULATION OF REC�U/RED RATE REIIENUE� INCREASES
2001 20Q2 2003 2004 2005 2006
__ ESTIMATE _ PROJECTED PRWECTED _ PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
, RATE /NCREASE REQU/RED TO MEEi COVE'RAGE REl�U/ EMEKTS; '
2 RAT�OVENANT DEBT SERVICL' REQUIREMENT�CURitEMT D/81 $517,000 $2,223,000 $2,223,000 $3,892,000 $3,891,000 $4,490,000
3 REVEL1fUE REQUIREME�VT� REQUIRED
4 NET REVENUES REQUIRED 1.15 $595,000 $2,556,000 $2,556,000 $4,476,OD0 $4,475,000 $5,164,000
5 NET REVENUES AVAILABLE __ __ 1,626,000 1,500,000 3,776,000 3,865,000 4,497,000 4,849,000
6 ADDITlONAL REVENUES REQUIRED _ _= __ $�,p56,000_ -- $611,000 $315,000
7 NET REVENUES PLUS NON-CURRENT ADJUSTMENT REQ'D .. _ _ _ _ _ Y
8 NET REVENUES PLUS NON-CURRENT ADJUSTMENT AVAlL. 1,626,000 1,500,000 3,776,OQ0 3,865,000 4,497,000 4,849,000
---- - - -------------------
— -- --- -
9 ADDITIONAL REVENUES REQUIRED __ _ _ _ --v- - _-----
10 - ---_- -- -- --` - _ — -----_
11 PARITY T�BT DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENT_(MAX. FUTUQtE PllS� $521,000� $2,226,000 $2,226,000 $3,896,000 $3,896,000 $4,495,000
12 REVENUE REQ.�,qREMENTS:
13 NET REVENUES REQUIREO 1.20 � $625,Od0 $2,671,000 $2,671,000 $4,675,000 $4,675,000 $5,394,000
14 NET REVENUES AVAILABLE _ _1,626,000 1,500,000 3,776,OQ0 3,865,000 4,497,000 4,849,000
15 ADDlTIONAL REVENUES REQUIRED ___- __ _ _ $1,171,000 -- $810,000 -- $545,000
16 NET REVENUES PLUS NON-CURRENT ADJUSTMENT REQ'D _ _ _ _ _ � ^^ --
17 NET REVENUES PLUS NON-CURRENTADJUSTMENTAVAIL. 1,626,000 1,500,�00 3,776,000 3,8B5,000 4,497,000 4,849,000
-- ---- -- - -- - -- -- ---
----- — - -- -
18 ADDlTIONAL REVENUES REQUIRED _ _ _ _ - _ "--- -
19 ----�-- - --_ --- -- --__------__
2D
21 TOTAL ADDITIONAL REVENUES REQUIREU (MAXIMUM OF ALL REQUIREMENTS) -- $1,171,000 -- $810,000 - $545,000
22 PERCENTAGE OF YEAR RATE INCREASE IS EFFECTIVE __ 100.00% 75.00% 100,00% 100.00% 100.00°h 100.00%
23 ANNUALIZED AMOUNT OF REVLNUE8 TO BE PRODUCED - $1,861,333 - $810�000 - 5546,000
24 DlVfDED BY: TOTAL REVENUES SUBJECT TO RA7E INCREASE 54,880,000 aS,194,000 57,873,000 58,181,000 �8,174,000 Sg,808,000
25 PERCENTAGE INCREASE iN RATES R@QUIRED TO
26 PROVIDE DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE — 30.06% — 9.89% — 5.50%
27
Page 1 of 3
� � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
� � � � � � � � � �
SCHEDUL�5
CAL C ULA T10N 4F REQ U/RED RA TE REVEI UUE INCREA SES
2001 Z002 2005 2004 2008 2006
t ESTIMAT�_ PROJECTED _ PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
za R.4 TE /NCREASE TO MEET TOTAL SYSTEM FUND/NG REQU/REMENTS: �
29 OTHER SOURCES�USES) OF FUNDS•
30 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT� . First year transter (FY 2000) calculated as FY 1999 transfer increased by FY 2000 rate increase.
31 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND (% REYENUES TWO YEARS AGO) 4 L ($155,000) ($225,000) ($225,000) ($235,000) _ ($330,000) ($389,000)
33 TOTAL OPBRATIN4i TRANSFERS OUT � (156,000) {225,000) (225,000) (235,000) (330,OOU) (369,000)
3d
35 CAPfTAL OUTLAY/TRANSFERS TO CAPLAL FUNDS'
36 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT
37 PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON LEASED EQUIPMENT (76,000) (89,000) (89,000) (89,000) (89,000} (89,000)
(143,000) (180,000) (180,000) (180,000) {180,000) (180,000)
38 TRANSFER TO GARAGE FUND (32,000) (25,000)
39 PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON ADDITIONAL LEASED EQUIPMENT - (71,OOQ) (118,000) (153,000) (143,000) (i43,000)
40 ALL PROGRAMS / COST GENTERS
4t REIMBURSEMENT FROM BOND FUNDS
43 TOTAL CAPIiAL EXPENDITURES - --- - - - - --- ---
� (251,000} (365,000) (387,000) (422,000) (412,000) (412,000
)
48 REFUND OF PCSB FEES (750,000)
49 CAPITALIZED PORTION OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
52 TOTi1L OTHERSYSTEMREQU/REMENTS (S1,iS7,00o) (SS80,000) (s612,000) (5657,000) (s742,000) (s781,00u)
53 LESS: FUND BALRNCES USED TO FUND "BELOW-THE LINE" REQUIREMENTS 251,000 385,000 38T,000 _
54 NET REQU/RE/NENT$ TO BE F�/NDED BY C[ORI�ENT FLOW OF FUNDS (5806,000► ($225,000) (5225,d00) (s657,000) (5742,000) (5781,000)
55 NET REVENUES IN CURRENT YEAR $1,626,000 $1,500,000 $3,7i6,000 $3,865,000 $4,497,000 $4,SA9,OdQ
56 ADD: AMOUNT PROVIDED BY RATE INCREA$E FOR COVERAGE -- 1,581,333 -- 810,000 -- 545,000
-- ------- -- - -- ----------- -- - - -- - ---- --...- -
57 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOFt DEBT SERVICE $1,626,000 $3,061,333 $3,776,000 $4,675,000 $4,497,000 $5,394,000
58 LESS: DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT _ (517,000) (2,223,000) {2,223,000) (3,892,000) {3,891,000) (4,490,Q00)
59 AVAILABLE INCOME AFTER PAYMENT OF DEBT 3ERVICE 57,709,000 5838,000 S1,S53,000 E783,000 5606,000 =904,000
SO NET "BELOW THE LINE" FUNDING REQUIREMENTS � •- -- -- •- (136,000) -
61 PERCENTAGE OF YEAR RATE INCREASE IS EFFECTIVE __ __ ___ _100.00°k __ 75.00°k 100.00% 100.00°k 100.00% 100.C�0°i6
62 ANNUALI2ED AMOUNT OF REVENUES TO BE PRODUCED - - - - 5136,OQ0 -
63 DIVIDED BY: TOTAL REYENUES SUBJECT 40 RATE INCREASE 4,880,000 5,184,000 7,373,000 8,181,000 9,174,000 9,908,Op0
64 PERCEN7A�3E lNCREASE IN RATES REQUIRED TO FUND
65 OTHER REQUIREMENTS _ - - - 7.48% -
68
g7 3UM OF REQUIRED RATE INCREASES FOR COVERAGE AND OTHER NET USES -- 30.06% -- 9.89% 1.48% 5.50%
68
73
Page 2 of 3
� � � � � � � � � � �� � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SCHEDULE 5
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
CALCULATION OF REQUIRED RATE REVENUE INCREASES
2007 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
_ESTINtATE PROJECTED PROJECYED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
�a RATE /NCREASE RE�f U/RED TO MA/NTA/N WORK/NG CAP/TAL RESERVES '
7s
76 OPERATING ACCOUNT BALANCE, BEGINNINGOF YEAR $2,544,000 $931,000 $1,066,000 $1,136,000 $1,222,000 $1,272,000
77 NET REVENUES FUND TRANSACTIONS, BEFORE RATE {NCREASES 1,302,000 5,994,000 1,803,000 (629,000) (81,000) (367,000)
78 RATE INCREASES FOR COVERAGE AND BELOW-THE-LINE REQUIREMENTS - 1,171,000 - 810,000 138,000 545,000
- -- ------- — — ----------- _ _--------- - ---- --------
79 INDICAYEO BALANCE BEFORE REQUIRED RE$ERVE$ $3,846,000 $8,096,000 $2,869,000 $i,317,000 $1,277,000 $1,450,000
80 LESS: REQUIRED RESERVES __ _ __ _ __ _
81 INOICATED BALANCE BEFORE ADJUSTMENT TO MEET TAR6ET � 53,846,000 $8,096,000 $2,869,000 57,317,000 $1,277,000 51,450,000
82 LESS:WORKING CAPITAL TARGET 931,000 1,066,000 1,136,000 __1,222,000_ 1,272,000 1,332,000
83 SURPW8 (DEFICIT) BALANCE 52,915,000 57,030,000 $1,733,000 $96,000 55,000 $118,000
84 PERCENTAGE OF YEAR RATE INCREASE IS EFFECTIVE 100.00°l0 75.00% 100.00% 100.00°/a 100.00% 100.00%
------ — ----- --- ---------_..._-- --- — - -
85 ADDITIONAL RATE REVENUES REQUIRED TO MEET TARGET _ _ _ _ _ _
86 DIVIDED BY: TOTAL REVENUES SUBJECT TO RATE INCREASE 54,980,000 Sg,194,000 $7,313,000 s8,191,000 $9,174,000 58,908,000
87 PERCBNTAGE INCREASE IN RATES TO � ' �
SS MEET DISCRETIONARY WORKING CAPITAL TARGET .. _ _
89
90 TOTAL PERCENTAGE INCREASE IN RATES TO FUND
91 REQUIREMENTS AND MEET DISCRETIONARY TARGET -- 30.06% - 9.89% 1.48% 5.50%
92
93
sa PLANNED RATE INCREASES 0.00°l0 35.00% 12.00% 12.00% 8.00% 8.00%
95
96
Page 3 of 3
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
SCHEDULE6
CITY OF CLEA�WATER, FLORIDA
STORMWA7ER UTILITY SYSTENi
CAP/ TAL IIVIPRO VEMEIV TS Pf��GRAM
(SCHEDULED TRANSFERS TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND)
FINAL PLAN
FISCAL YEARS
PRQJECT PROJECT FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, �
TOTAL cooE wuMSEa PROJECT NAME zoo� 2ooz zooa -aooa zoos zooe ----
L+PCATffO C/Pt
_------ ---- S4,o0o--- Pt---.3�5.�Z827._ Global Positioning SurveY E9 -- - $4,D0o
14,000 P2 . 31s9q5�o Air Conditioner Replacements
- - - ---._ .._._.. - -- -
-- - --- - - --- -- -- -
- -- - - -- _ -
- _ .. . - - . _ 14,000
9 00o P3 a�5seta3 Stormwater Qualit Im r
- - _ _ - --- -- - - - - --- ---- - - -- - - ---_ - - -- _ _---- - ....
- - - - - .-..-'-.--..._--- - -- - -- --- --- -- Y.. p --- -- - --..._...--- _....._ -- -�-- - - - - S9,000
- - -------- _ -...___ -__ - ---- - ---_._...
2 a10 Pa 315-98105 Habitat Restoration & Im r _-._----- ------------...___----_.-------.---..
__... - - . .... � -- -- ....__-- - - - - - - -- -- - p - - _ -_ . __ - - ___ _ - --- - - -- $a,oao
-- --- --- ---- - - -..._-
S 000 P5 315-96118 Storm Drain B R&R �'-----_.--------�---------------------__.........----------------.-__.
-
- - - ---- - ' -- -- - -- -- �--- - -- -- '- �- -- - - ___...-- --- -- _... --- ---...--'-._... ___ __ - �5,000
_ _ __ _-- -.�.t,000._ P6_.._3tsas1ls_ _Allen's Crk Rehab at Hercules - - -- - - - ---- --- -- - -- -- - --- - - - ---- -- -- --- - -__..__ - - --- --
- _.___ --- -- $3A,fl00
_ --- _ __ . ._._.. . . -- _. .
-- i S 000 P7 315-9612p Alh atorCrklm 18f11C11f2ltOf1 ---- --- ---�-- ----.... ..__-_._._.
'. �' . _ - 9 P --. _ -- - - _ - $655,000 $899,000
--
_. . . 92,000 _ P8. 3�5-se�2i CoopePs Pi Restor 8 Mgmnt _ - - g32,000 --- -- -_ _--- . - ---_.. . -----. . _.---------.
-
� -
_ .... _- - --. _ . $30,000 $30,000
__
s,S14,o00. .P10 315-96124 Storm Pipe Sxstem impr __ _ _ _ , _ $730,004 $i,084,OQ0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,0OO,OQO
- - - -
11,65S,omo P1t 37&96125 Town Pond _-_.. _ __ _ $4,971.000 $5,675,000 $907,000 $100,000,
- - _ - __
__ �9s,000 P72 375-96127 N. Greenwood Stmwtr Retrofit _ - - _ - --- - - - -
__ --
-- -
- - --
- - - � - - - -- $251,000 $44,000
- --- - - - -_ - ..
- - ----- ---- - - - - -- ...- -- - - - - -- -- --� - - - °--_....__......_
667,000 Pt3 37s96128 Alien's Crk Gabion $667,040
- - -- ---- - - - - --- - -- - - - -- - -- --- - - - -- -- -- _ - ---- - -._.... --- -- - - ----.._.._ - ..._.. --- - - --.
7 00 00o P14 375-ss12s 5tevensons Crk Estua Rest bond --- ----------.....-- ----------._.._..._----__._.--.--.-
- - - '� ' -- -- - -- � --� - - ... - - - - - -- -- -ry - _ � - -.)._.._..... ---- - -- -- - --- - - - -$1,417,000-- - $1,033,000 $2,275,000 $2,275,000 _ _
--- --- -- _ -- - - - ------... -- ----- --__._.._------ - - _ -
22s,o00 Pt5_ .,. s61pc North Greenwood Corridor Enhancement $225,000
- - - _-- - ----
-- -- - -- ----
_- - - -- -__- -
- ---- 44,00o P16- -315-9613o NPDES - - - $� � -- - -- - - . . . .- - -- - - ---- - - -- - -- --
- --- - -- --- - -- -- - -- ---- _..._ - - - ---- ---- -- --- -- - --'
_.....- ---- ---- -- - ..__.._.. - --- ---- -------- - -- -- -- -- -- -
�,008,Q00 P19 31538137 FDEP Compliance
_ - -- - -
200,000 $758,000 $40,000
- - -- --
_- .
s2,00o---P20 315-9851s City W�de Aenal PhotaJr�PhY .... . _-. _.-- . _---- - 522,000 - - - � - -° -
_ _._. __.
_ _. -
-
464,000 P2t 315-96521 PW Infrastructure Management Syst _ _ $172,000 „ _ $91 000 $67,000_.. -' $67,000 $67,000
- _ _ _ -
_----_ eoo,000 P22 ssvoc Aliens Creek Neighbothood Flooding _--- --- _---- - - - ---- ---- -- --,- ----... --.----------- --5600,000 __ --- - - -
. _ ..
^1,370,000 P23 setXX AIli�ator Creek Chnl A Wdng/Xfr Stn Clvrt $655,000 $655,000
- --
- -
�,1�4,000 . P24 ssvoc Alligator Creek Drainage imprnnnt @ US19 _ _ _ _ $550,000 $2,000,000 $564,000
-, sas,o0o P25 961Xx MorningsidelMeadows Drainage Improvements ------ _.__--- ---__._,-------- __. _ _..._._. __..... . _ _....-- - ----5575,000- - - .. - - . - -
- - ._ __ -- . .. . -. .. .
fie,8�E,00o_-P26__._ ss1Xx--- Kapok Mobile Home Park._---- --- ------- ----_-._.-_--.--- $6,182,000 $8,006,000 $2,50Q000
-- - - -
--9,sss,000 P2i 9rvoc._ MyrtieAvenue Drain e Im rovements _ - - - - ---_ __.-- ----... . -.---.------.
-� P. ..
_. _ - - - -- $255,000 - -
__ - - $9,100,000
-- - -- _- - -
- a7o,000 P28 ----96hXX ----' e - - ei�hborhood Dreinage - - _-- -- ---- $470,000 - --- --- -- - - _- ___
-- -...
- - _.. ------
900 00o P29 ss1�c Sharkey Rd Drainage Improvements -""
- - - - $900,000 -
- - - --.
a,000 000 P30 __-9svoc--__ Storm System E�ansion _._. __ _ _ . $1,000,000 $1,OOQ,000 $1,000,000 $1,d00,000
-- -
_-- �,ess,04o P31 -_,--961XX Stevensons Creek Implementation Projects _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . $3,255,000 $1,072,000 - $1,108,000 $500,000
- - -
. ._. . _- -- - - - --
y3o,000 P32 ssvoC ro ic Hills Draina e im rouements ` -
- --- - --- -. . .-- ._._ - P.. 9 P - _ -- � $55Q0�0
_ - - - -- - __ - ---- -- -.... - - - ---� - - - - -�- - - ----- ---- - - - - - ------ �- -- - - - - --- --
�72�403�000 TOTAL STORMWATIpR SrSTEM .575�87S��OQ $23�288�OQ0 'j18�868�000 'jBe268�000 ;5�880�000 �3�064�U00
$OURCE:BURTON &ASSOCIATE9 FILE:G:11231DATA1CLW5TO11REPORT110101EJ(.NM4 p3jpgjyp�y
Page 1 ot 1
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTTLITY SYSTEM
ANN(!AL PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY
Ftaw�_v_u►r�
SCHEDULE 7
- - -- - --- -- --- ----
APPLICATION OF FUNDS .
- ---- -------� -- - ------
2001 ' �
PROJECT 1999 BOND PROCEEDS I NOT USED NOT USED REVENUE ACCOUNT
COST FUN�Ep BY
THIS i FUND FUNDS FUND � FUN�S FUND FUNDS FUND FUNDS REVENUE
�___ _YEAR _� BALANCE APPLIED _ BALANCE � APPL�ED BALANCE APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED BONDS
��GIi�1�VIN�HALAT�T�E���i��OC�A) ------ - — 5�376,000 -- i — — � - ,544,000 -- - -
ADDITiONAL FUNDS (SCHEDULE B) 148,000 ! - 51,302,000
SUBTOTAL 5,5 � �-- -�-----� � . 3,848. 0
I LESS: DEDICATED BALANCE (SCHEDULE A) N!A � � W/A � NIA $931,000
�TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS I—�,526,000 � �- i - 2,915,000
ROJECTS (SCHEDULE C): i i _ � - -
1 Global Positioning Survey Eq $4,000 I I i
2 Air Conditioner Replacements � � $4,000
� 3 Stormwater Qualky Impr 9,040 - � � , 9,000
4 Habitat Restoration & Impr 2,000 � � - i _
- - 2,000
5 Storm Drainage R&R � 5,000 � i 5,000 I - _ _ _
6 Alien's��k F�e�6 af�ercu ea ! --j -�� ------ � ---- 34,000 i - ----I---- ----- ---- -
i- - -- _- - ----
, 7 Alligator Crk Impiementation � 655,000 � I 655,000 ; I. - _ . _
� 8 Cooper's Pt Restor � Mgmnt 32,000 i - i � i 32,000
9 - - . _ _ -
1Q Storm PipeSystem Impr 730,D0�� �_- - 730,000 -
�------- --- - ------ --- ----
I 11 �own�ncT----- 4,971, 0---- ---- I - _ I 2, �00 2,�33,000
12 N. Greenwood Stmvulr Retrofit 251,000 251,000 �
13 Allen's Crk Gabion 667,000 667,000 �
14 Steve�sons Crk Estuary Rest (bond) 1,417,000; i - - _; - � - I 1,417,000
__.- ----�-------�- I --_ --- - - - ----
16 �1P�71 E$-------- --- - 44, 00 i - � - - 44 0
19 FDEP Com liance I 200,000 � �����I ������ ������-___ � I - � - 200 0
21 FV�Tn�structure�na ement _ � , _ �2,000 --- - --�- -- — 00
- - ---
, 00
- - ----
g yst---- 1�2�00 _ _ .
26 Rap�o ile ome ark , �07 --- ,742,000 - --� -- - - --- ' 2�40,000
- - — --- r-----�- -�----- - --- - ---- - --- - —
OTAL $15,375,000 � $5,526,000 I - I -
_._____,___ ______ _ _ $2,915,000 $6,934,000
- �-_-------- -- -
ENDING BALANCE ! _
5931 000
SOURCE: BURTON 8 ASSOCIATES
Fl�E: C:11231DATAVCLWST011REPORT1110101EX.WK4
03l0812002
Page 1 of 6
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTTLITY SYSTEM
ANNUAL PROJECT FUND/NC SUMMARY
FINAL PL�1N
SCHEDULE 7
I APPLICATION OF FUNDS ----
� � O 2 , ----� �------
� I
PROJECT 1999 BOND PROCEEDS PIOT USED I NOT USED REVENUE ACCOUNT
I COST I
I FUNDED BY
THIS FUND FUNDS '– FUND i FUNDS � FUtJD NFU DS FUND FUNDS REVENUE
YEAR BALANGE APPLIED BALANCE I APPLIED � 6ALANCE � APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED BONDS
BE INNINGBALANCE( C� D �EA) -_----- --i---_ —(-----. ---�— — _— y�s�,000
ADD�TIONRL FUNDS (SCHEDULE B) I �_ ' __ I =___I _ :_ i a�
UBT ESS: DEDICATED BALANCE {SCHEDULE A) I ! �tp _ 4 � N/A wp ;�'�g 0�
TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL PROJEC7S � � � 57,222,000
ROJECTS (SCHEDULE C): I I
1 Giobal Positioning Survey Eq _ ' _
2 Air Conditioner Replacements 14,000 � _ I I ' " '
3 Stormwater Quality impr i _ ,, _ i i , : i $14,000 -
b Habitat Restotation 8 Impr I _ . i ; - "
i 5 Storm Drainage R&R _ _ i _ I i__ _ ' -
i6 Alien's Crk Rehab at Hercules . - � _ - t --- � _ —+ — -- - -- _ -- _ --
7 Ailigator Crk Implementation � 899,Q00 - - $899,000
9 Coops�'s Pt Restor & Mgmnt � I - - - $30,000 -
10 Storm PipeSystem Impr__ 1,084,OOOI � � "
----- -- — -1--- --- ' - -- -- — - � $1,084,000 -
11 Town Pond 5.675,000 � -- I - �-- --- - - _ --- ---- — -- y48D,000
12 N. Greenwood Stmwtr Retrofit 44 ppp � � ' $5,195,000
14 Stevensons Crk Estuary Rest (band) 1,D33,0001 I �
i - 344,000
15 North Greeriwood Corridor Enhancement � 225,000; - I ' - - $$225,000
19 FDEP Compliance 768 000 � I
21 PW Infrastructure Man�ement SYSt ---- -- - g�--- _ � - i- - --- -- - -- - 768 000
28 Ke ------ 8,006,000 --i-- - — - $91 000
� pok Mobile Home Park �-- - -; ------- - _ _ - -- $8,006,000
�------I i
27 Myrtle Awenue Drafnage Improvements 255,000 i I i � $255,000
28 N. Beach Neighborfiood Drainage 470,000' � - $470,000
29 Sharkey Rd Drainage Improvements 470,000' i _ i i : _ I - ggpp,000
30 Storm System Expansion gpp,ppp
32 Tropic Hills Drainage Improvements 3,355,000 i - � - � - $3,255,000
33 - 550,000 �
------------------ ------ " -
------- ------
i i---- ---r --- ---- - - = 5550,000
OTAL I$23,769,000 I - � i �
- - $7,222,000 $16,547,Od0
— --- ---
EN�ING BALANCE ---�-------'----- -- - � ---�--- -
51 066 000
$OURCE: BURTON $ ASSOCIATfS FI{.E: C:\1231DATAtCLWST011REPORT1110101EX.WK4 03l08/2002
Page 2 of 6
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTTLITY SYSTEM ,
ANNUAL PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY
FINAL PLAN
SCHEDULE7
---------- ------ -- - - ---- — APPLICATION OF FUNDS — _— ----
♦__' -___-____'__.._ _ -__-_ j _-.___' '-_._'_. ___--__-
I �
Z�O� I PRWECT I 1998 BOND PROCEEDS I I
I �
NOT t�SED � NOT USED I REVENUE ACCOUNT
COST i i PUNDED BY
THIS i FUNO FUNDS ,� FUND FUNDS FUND FUNDS FUND FWNDS REVENUE
YEAR i BALANCE� APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED BAIANCE APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED BONDS
BEGINNING BALANCE (SCHEDULE A) ' - • � 51,066,000
ADDITIONAL FUNDS (SCHEDULE B) I � _-__T I � j2,681 000
UBTOiAL . - --�j -
� LESS: DEDICATED BALANCE (SCHEDULE A) � N/A I N1A NtA ;1,13g,ppp
�TOTAI AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS � ---; I - i , - ;2,611,000
�ROJECTS (SCHEDULE C): _ , _ -
1 Gbbal Positioning Survey Eq I I
2 Air Conditioner Replacements I _
i3 Stormwater Quality Impr - ; � - � ! - I _ _ _
4 Habitat Restoration & impr - I _ i i _ i
� i � ' - -
I7 AliigatorCrkAl9mplementation I� -- ----- '-- —�---- --�— " - -
5 _Storm Drain e R&R
6 Allen's Crk Rehab al Hercules ---- -- --; i - i _ --- I _ --- — -- _-- --- _ --
� - - - -
8 Cooper's Pt Restor & Mgmnt 30,000 I - I - - $30,000 -
9 _ j ' - -
10 Storm PiPe System Impr ___ I 1,000,000 - - i � $1,000,000
----+-- - -
91 Town Pond ------ ; 907,000 � ------ - ---�---- I— --- $907,000 -
, i -- --- --j---
14 Stevensons Crk Estuary Rest (bond) 2,275,0001 � I ! - - I $674,000 $1,fi01,000
19 FDEP Campliance �_ 40,000 i - I _ _ i
21 PW Infrastructure Management Syst — -- - --- � 67,000 i - f - ------i I - _ — - ---- --- ---- -- -� --- — $67,000
25 MominQside/Meadows Dreinasae Improvements._._ ___l__ 575,000 � __�___ _� _
26 Kapok Mobile Home Park 2,500,OOOt I . ------"-�— _ -- — - -- -- _ _ $575,000
I I i r - i - $2,500,OOD
27 MyrtleAvenueOrainagelmprovements 9,100,000� - - I - - $9,100,000
30 Storm System Expansion 1,000,000 � - - - - $1,000,000
31 Stevensons Creek Implementation projects 1,072,000 � � - � - ___T - __ - $1,072,000
- ----- � -�- - _----- i - — ..- -- --- --
r ------- --= � -- ----�-- - - - T- - --- --I��----
OTAL � $18,586,OQ0; $2,611,000 $15,955,000
END�NG BALANCE ' � � $1,136 004 --- ----
SOURCE: BURTONd�AS30C1ATES FILE:C:t1231DATAlCLWST011REPORT\170101EX.WK4 p3�pg/qppy
Page 3 of 6
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
ANNUAL PROJECT FUND/NC� SUMMARY
FINA�. PLAN
SCHEDULE7
� - �___-_T ____- __ _ -___ - ___
APPLICA7'ION OF FUNDS
---- - -�- --- — - -- ---- ----
� Zoo4 -�______ ; .
PROJECT I 1999 BOND PROCEEDS I NOT USED NOT USED REVENUE ACCOUNT
COST FUNDED BY
THIS FUND FUNDS FUIVD FUNDS FUND FUNDS. FUND FUNDS REVENUE
� YEAR BALANCE APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED � BALANCE � APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED j BONDS
BEGINNING BALANCE (SCHEDULE A) • � �� . $1,136,000 �t-
f ADDITIONAL FUNDS (SCHEDULE B) I � --_ �--- -- . f—S1,490,000 i
SUBTOTAL I i �
� LESS: DEDICATED BALANCE (SCHEDULE A) I - N!A � � N1A
! � ,_---- NIA 51,222,000
ITOTAL AVAILABIE FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS � . • • E2B8,000
ROJECTS (SCHEDULE Cj: � I I
1 Global Positioning Survey Eq - � - I _ I " - -
2 Air Conditioner Repiacements - ! _ _ _
3 Stormwater Quality Impr - i - � _ _ I . _
4 Habitat Restoretion & Impr _ �
5 Storm Dreinage R8R _ , I -
6 Allen's Crk Rehab at Hercules — -------
�- _ -t- - --- _---�- --- — _ -- ---- — - ---- --
' 7 Alligator Crk Impiementation _ � I _ ' �
8 Coopers Pt Restor & Mgmnt - I _ j � _ _ _ �
9 ' _ j i �
10 Storm Pipe System Impr 1,000,000 {�— __� - �_ __ __ I $268,000 $732,000
11 Town Pond ---- --- 100,0001 -- -- � ------- _ - �— $100,000
14 Stevensons Crk Estuary Rest (bond) 2,275,000 - - - $2,275,000
20 City Wide Aeriaf Photostraphv 22 �00_I - �
21 PW infrastructure Management Syst � 67,000 - " -- - _ $22 000
--� --- _ ---- ---- _ - ------ - $67,000
22 ABens Creek Neighborhood Flooding 500,000 � - � - I - - $600,000
23 Ailigator Creek Chnl A Wdng/Xfr Stn Clvrt 655,000 - � - - $655,000
24 Alligator Creek Drainage Imprvmnt � US19— 550,000 i ' i ' � ^ $550,000
30 Storm System E�ansion 1,000,000 I I - - $1,000,000
--- ---�-- i --- --I----7— -- - -----
OTAL $6,269,OOQ; - � I � $268,000 $8,001,000
--- ---- -�-- -- --- -
ENDING BALANCE � S7,222 000
30URCE: BURTON & ASSOCIATES FILE: C:h23\DATA\CLWST01\REPORT1110101EX.WK4 03106I2002
Page 4 of 6
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � r � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTTLITY SYSTEM
ANNUAL PROJECT FUND/NG SUMMARY
��Nw_�uN �
SCHEDULE7
- ---- - -- -- - - - ---- -�--- - � APPUCATION OF FUNDS
�
2005 -� - -----� -- ,- ---1---- --
PROJECT 1989 BOND PROCEEDS NOT USED NOT USED REVENUE ACCOUNT
COST ' i FUNDED BY
THIS FUND FUNpS ' FUND FUNDS FUND FUNDS FUND FUNDS REVENUE
_ _YEAR _ BALANCE __APPUED BALANCE APPLIED BALANCE APPIIED BALANCE APPLIED BONDS
BEGINNING BALANCE (SCHEDULE A) -- . . _� Zyq � --- -- -
ADDITIONAL FUNDS (SCHEDUIE B) � � ;663,000
UBTOTAL - - - S 81 76,000
LESS: DEDICATED BALANCE (SCNEDULE A) NU4 N!A NIA 51 272,000
TO7AL AVAILABLE FOR CAP�TAL PROJECTS I - � I - 5�3,000
IROJECTS (SCHEDULE C): _ _ I
1 Global Positioning Survey Eq
2 Air Conditioner Replacements � _ _ _ .
3 Stormwater Quality Impr - � - _ _ _ _
4 Habitat Restoration & Impr - � - � _ _ _ _
5 Storm DrainageR&R____ i - ���I�_� - j _ _ _ _
6 Ailen's Crk Rehab al Hercules - I �--_ ----� _ � _ --` - _ -
7 Alligator Crk Implementation - - � � _ _ _ _
8 Cooper's Pt Restor 8� Mgmnt - - I � _ _ . _
9 - - I i _
10 Storm P�e System Impr 1,000,000 �_ - _
�__.� _ _�_____ $603,000 $397,000
21 PW InfrastruCture Management Syst 67,0001 - i - - . i $67,000
23 Alligator Creek Chnl A Wdng/Xfr Stn Civrt 655,000 ; - - - - $655,000
24 Alligator Creek Drainage Imprvmnt � US19 2,000,000 � - � - - - $2,000,000
30 Storm System E�ansion 1,000,000 - � - - - $1,000,000
I 31 Stevensons Cteek Implementation Projects 1,108,000 - �
---- --- - -- -- --"_._�_----- - - -- - $1.108,000
jTOTAL $5,830,000 I -
� _,� -_ - $603,000 $5,227,000
i
__- --- � ---- �
ENDING BAI.ANCE I
_ E1,272 000
SOURCE; BURTQN & ASSOCIATES
FILE: C:\123\DATA\CLWST011REPORT1110101EX.WK4
03/0612002
Page5of6
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEAR WATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTTLITY SYSTEM
ANNUAL PROJECT FUND/NG SUMMARY ,
�-� P� SCHEDULE 7
� ----- -- APPLICATION OF FUNDS
� O�� PROJECT 1999 BOND PROCEEDS �NOT USED NOT USED REVENUE ACCOUNT
COST FUNDED BY
THIS FUND FUNDS FUND FUNDS FUND FUNDS FUND FUNDS REVENUE
_ YEAR BALANCE I APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED BALANCE APPLIED BONDS
BEGINNING BALAHCE (SCHEDULE A) - � . — — . 51,272,000
ADDITIONAL FUNDS (SCHEDULE B) yt26 000
UBTOTAL - 57,698,000
LESS: DEDICATED BALANCE (SCHEDULE A) N/A N!A NIA 51,332,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS - I . . 5366,000
ROJECTS (SCHEDULE C): i
1 Globa� Positioning Survey Eq _ . i . _ _ _
2 Air Conditioner Replacements _ _ _ _ _ _
3 Stamwater Quality Impr . _ � _ _ _ _
4 Habitat Restoration & Impr _ . I _ _ _ _
5 Storm Drainaae R&R _ � __. I_
6 Anen's Crk Rehab at Hercules _ i —1- _ ---- --- -- _—
7 Alligator Crk implementffiion _ _ i i _ _ _
8 Cooper's Pt Restor & Mgmnt - _ . _ . _
9 ' - - - � - - -
10 Storm Pipe System Impr 1,000,000 - - - 366,000 634,000
24 Alligator Creek Drairta$e Impn�mnl (c� US19 564,000 - - - - 564,000
30 Stortn System Expansion 1,Op0,000 - - - - 1,000,000
31 Stevensons Creek implementation Projecls 500,000 - _ _ _
— —�- - — — --- - -- _ 500,OOC1
OTAL $3,064,000 _ _
_ ___ _ _ $366,000 $2,698,000
—_.-�------- ;7 332,000 ---- -
ENDING BALANCE
SOURCE: BURTON 8 ASSOCIATES
FILE: C:11231DATAICLWST011REPORT�170101EX.WK4 03I08/2�2
Page B M 6
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
OPERA TIONS AND MA/NTENANCE EXPENSES
DETAILED COST CENTER PROJECTION�
SCHEDULE8
SOURCE: BURTON &ASSOCIATES_______ __ __ _ C:11231DATAICLWST01U2EPOR11110101EX.WK4 _ 03f0612002
FISCAL YEAR ENDpVG SEPTEMBER 30,
COST 06JCCT 2001 2002 2003 2004 ZOOS 2006 ��
FUMD ClNTER COD! ACCOUNT DlSCRIPTION ESTIMAT! PRO.1lCTlO PROJCCTCD PROJCGTlD PRWCCTlD PROJlCTCD
ANNUAL INCR�A,R�$ APPLICD TO OPERATIN(;_ �XPlNSEB:
%GROWTH RECOGN¢ED pV EXPElJSES N!A
ANNUAL GROYYTH COMPONENT N/A -- - __ --- __ __ _---
ANNUALdYFLATpNCOMPONENT N/A 3.00% 3.OQ% 3,00% 3.00% 3.00q
!!
AlL PAY 6 PAtl-RELATlD TO RlFIlCT MlRIT $YST!'M N!A 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50q 2.50%
ADD FOR HlALTH INSURANC! N/A 19.SQ% 14.50% 9.50% 9.50% 9.50%
ADD FOR PCNSION CONTRISYTION RAT! INCRlASC N/A
19B5 ENG/NEERlNG /WATERSNED MANAGEMENT �
��- 419 1385 510100 FULL TIME SALARIES & WAGES � 209,88� 308,320 325,2i8 � 343,168 382,042 � 381,954
419 1365 510200 PARTTIMESALARIESBWAGES -- __ __ __ __ _.
419 1385 570400 SPECIAL PAY ._ __ __ __ __ __
419 1385 510500 OVERTIME 1,94Q 1,000 1,055 1,113 1,174 1,239
419 1365 510800 VACATION LEAVE -- __ _ __ __ _.
419 1365 510700 SICKLEAVE -- ._ _ _. _. __
419 1365 510800 OTHER PAID LEAVE -- __ __ __ __ __
419 1365 512700 HOLIDAYTIME -- __ ._ __ __ .,
419 1385 520100 LIF'e INSURANCE-EMP/PENS 60 BO 83 67 70 74
419 1385 520200 1%LIFEINSURANCE-EMPLOYEE 1,190 1,280 9,329 1,4Q2 1,480 1,581
419 1365 520300 SAMP LIPE INSURANCE � 400 430 454 479 505 533
419 1365 520400 MAJOR MEDICAL INSEMP 20,340 22,600 28,106 28,588 31,302 34,275
d19 1365 520800 SOCIAL SECURITY-EMPLOYEE 1,950 2,130 2,247 2,371 2,501 2,839
419 1365 520700 EMP PENSION PLAN 20,430 21,570 22,758 24,008 25,328 26,721
419 1385 520900 WORKMANSCOMPENSATION 2,910 2,950 3,112 3,283 3,464 3,855
419 1365 521000 DISA8ILITYINSURANCE - .. _ __ __ __
419 1365 530100 PROFESSIONAI SERVICES i 20,000 23,500 24,205 24,931 25,879 26,449
41H 1365 530300 OTHERCONTRACTUALSERV 31,000 42,000 43,280 44,558 45,895 47,271
419 1365 540100 GARAGESERVICES 930 -- -- __ __ __
419 1365 540200 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION 300 350 388 382 399 417
419 1385 540300 TELEPHONE SERVICEGS -- 2,300 2,404 2,512 2,625 2,743
419 1385 540500 RAD�O SVC-FIXED 400 -- - -- __ __
Page 1 of 5
� �
� � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
� � � � � � �
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
OPERAT/ONS AND MA/NTENANCE EXPEIVSES
DETAILED COST �ENTER PROJECTIONS
SCHEDULE8
SOURCE: BUR70N 6 ASSOCIATES C:\123�DATAICLWST01�FtEPORT110101EX.WK4 03/08f2002
FlSCALYEAR ENDWO SEPTEMBER 30,
C08T 06JlCT 2001 Y002 2003 2004 2pp3 2ppg
FUND GCN7CR GODE AGCOUNT DlSCRIPTION ESTIMAT! PROJlCTED �RO.1lC7CD PROJlCTlD PROJlCTCD PROJlCTlD
419 1365 540600 TELEPHONE SVC FIXED 2,980 1,720 1,797 1,878 1,983 2,051
419 1385 540700 POSTAL SERVICE 850 250 281 273 283 298
419 1385 540900 RISKMGMTSERVICE 1,210 1,220 1,275 1,332 7,392 1,455
4t9 1385 541000 CISCHARGE 32,200 33,490 34,997 36,572 38,218 39,937
419 1385 541300 PRINTSHOPSVCS -- 1,000 1,045 1,082 1,141 1,193
419 1385 541400 PURCHASINCa SVC -- _ _. ._ .. __
419 1385 541500 GARAGEVARIABLE -- .. .. __ _ __
419 �386 541800 BLDG&MAINT-VARIABLE , - ._ ._ _. _ ._
419 1385 542000 EMPRELATIONSSVC 600 970 1,014 1,059 1,107 1,157
419 1385 542400 OTHERUTILCHARGES -- -- _ _ __ _
419 1365 542500 POSTAGE 1p0 100 103 106 109 113
419 1365 542800 INTERFD OTHER SERV CHGS -• -- _• _ .. ..
419 7385 543400 PRINTING & BiNDING -- -- _ _. .. ..
419 1385 544l00 EQUIPT RENTAL , -• 10Q 103 108 108 113
419 1385 548200 OTHER EQUIP SVC & REPAIR -- _ ._ . .. _ __
419 1385 547100 UNIFORMSEMPLOYEE 980 180 185 191 197 203
419 1385 547200 TRAVELEXPENSE-EMP 3,800 5,000 5,150 5,305 5,464 5,828
419 1365 547300 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 500 250 258 285 273 281
419 1385 547400 MEALS-EMPLOYEE 300 100 103 108 109 113
419 1385 547900 STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS 570 -- - ._ ._ _.
419 1365 548W0 07HER SERVICES OR CHARGES 100,000 -- -- -- __ __
419 7385 550100 OFFICESUPPLIES -- -- _ _ __ _.
419 1365 550400 OPERATING SUPPLIES & MATLS 2,380 2,500 2,575 2,652 2,732 2,814
419 1365 552000 COMPUTER SOFTWARE -• __ _. ._ _ _.
419 1365 557100 MEMBERSHIPBU@S-EMP 2,500 1,500 7,545 1,591 1,839 1,888
419 1385 557200 OFFICL RECOGNITION-EMP 60 80 82 84 88 - 68
419 1365 557300 TRAING 8 REFERENCE-EMP 3,800 19,000 19,570 20,167 20,762 21,385
419 1385 559400 PRIOR YR ENC-PURCHASES - -- _ _. _ _.
419 1385 564000 MACHINERY$EQUIPpAENT CALCULATEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
419 1385 564300 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 4,000 tO,OW 10,300 10,609 10,927 11,255
419 1385 585800 COST MATL & SERVICES CALCULATED AT AC�iGRfGATE LEVEL
419 7365 569400 PRIORENGPURCHASES CALCULATEDATAC,GREGATELEVEL
419 1365 569800 CONTRA ACCT-CAP COST CALCULATED ATA�GREGATE LEVEL
419 1385 590200 INTERFUNDTRANSFER CALCULATEDATAGGREGATELEt/EL
419 1365 59a700 CONTR TO GEN FIXED ASSETS �
419 1385 590800 CONTR TO 181 &NR C�P FND CALCULATED ATAG�RE�ATE LEVEL
419 1385 592800 RESIDUALE�UITYTRANSFER
419 7385 591000 CONTRIBTOGARAGEFUND CALCULA7EDATAGGREGATELEVEL
TOTAL EN6/NEEA/ /WATFRSNFDMANAOEMENT SO,OrBO SOB,ffO lF,A?978 1BqZ>9 SBB,,9� Bf$1B2
DEDUCTIOiUS FOR NON-0&M ITEMS
CAPIT9L
564000 MACHWERY&E�UIPMENT CALCULATEDATAGGREOATELEVEL
585800 COST MATI & SERVICES CALCULATED AT AGGRE�ATE LEVEL
589400 PRIOR ENGPURCHASES CALCULATEDATAGGREGATECEVEL
589800 CONTRAACCT-CAPCOST CALCULATEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
590800 CONTRT01818dORCIPFND CALCULATEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
591000 CONTRIB TO GARAGE FUND CALCULATED AT AGGREGATE LEVEL
TOTAL CAPITAL � -- -. _ ._ ._ __ --
590200 INTERFUND TR4NSFER CRLCULATED AT AGGREGATE LEVEL
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS
�
� �
Page 2 of 5
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SCHEDULE 8
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
OPERATIONS AND MA/NTENANCE EXPENSES
DETA/LED COST CENTER PROJECT/ONS
SOURCE: BUR70N 3 ASSOCIATES _____ __ C:\1231DATAlCLWST01�itEPORT111Q101EX.WK4 03/OBl2002
FISCAL. YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,
COST 06JCCT 20pi 20p2 2003 2004 2005 2008
RUND CCNTlR COD! ACCOUNT DlSCRIPTION lSTIMAT[ PROJCCTlD PROJlCTlD PROJlCTCD PROJlCTCD PROJCCTED
1986 ENG/NEER7N6/ENVIRONMENT.9L REG[KATORY
419 1366 510100 FllLLTIMESALARIES&WAGES � __ ---- _ �---� __ --- _. _
419 t368 570400 SPECIAIPAY �- -- _ -- -- --
419 4386 510800 VACATION IEAVE -- __ _. _. .. .,
419 1386 510700 SICK LEAVE -. _. _. ._ __ __
419 1388 510800 OTHER PAID LEAVE -- _. .. __ _ __
419 1388 512700 HOLIDAYTIME ._ _. __ ._ __ ._
419 7368 520100 LIFE INSURANCE-EMPoPENS -- _. _ __ __ __
419 1368 520200 1%LIFEINSURANCE-EMPLOYEE i -- __ __ ._ _. __
419 1366 520300 SAMP LIFE INSURANCE -- __ __ __ ._ ._
4�9 1368 520400 MAJOR MEDfCAL INSEMP -- _. _. __ .. _.
4'19 1388 520800 SOCIAL SECURITY-EMPLOYEE -- __ _. .. ._ __
419 1368 520700 EMP PENStON PLAN -e __ __ _ __ __
419 1368 520900 WORkQ�AANSCOMPENSATION -- _ .. ._ __ __
419 1368 521000 DISABILITYINSURANCE -- __ __ __ __ __
419 1388 530100 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -- __ __ __ __ __
419 1388 530300�OTHERCONTRACTUALSERVICES •- -- __ __ _ _
419 1366 SA01W GARAOESERVICES -- __ __ __ __ __ �
418 1368 54Q200 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION _ __ __ _. .. __
419 1368 540300 TELEPHONESERVICE-GS -- _. _. __ _. __
419 1366 540500 RADIO SVC-FIXED _ __ __ _ __ __
419 1368 540800 SWITCHBOARD BILUNG -- __ _ _ ._ .
419 1368 540800 BLDG SVGS-FIXED -- ._ __ __ ._ ._ �
419 1366 540900 RISK MGMT SERVICE -- ._ __ __ .. __
419 1366 541000 CIS CHARGE -- __ __ _ .. ,_ �
419 1368 5-01100 BLDG & MAINT pEPT SVC FX -- _- _ __ _ ._
419 1388 541300 PRINTSHOPSVCS __ _ __ __ _ __
419 1368 541400 PURCHASING SVC -- ._ __ __ ._ __
419 1368 541700 RADIO SERVICE-VARIABIE -- .- ._ ._ __ __
419 1368 542000 EMP RELATtONS SVC � -. __ _. __ _. __
419 t388 542500 POSTAGE __ __ __ ._ .. _
419 t388 547100 UNIFORMS-EMPLOYEE -- _. . _ _. _ ..
419 1368 547200 TRAVEL EXPENSE-EPAP -- .. __ __ _ __
419 1388 547300 MILEAGEREIMBURSEMENT -- __ .. __ ._ __
419 1388 550100 OFFICE SUPPLIES -- -. _ __ __ __
419 1388 550400 OPERATING SUPPLIES & Iv1ATLS -- -- __ .. _. ..
419 1366 557100 MEMBERSHIP/SUBS-EMP -- __ _ _. ._ __
419 1368 557200 OFFICL RECOGNITfON-EMP .. _. __ __ __ __
419 13�8 557300 TRAINING 8 REF • EMPIOYEE -- _. __ __ _ ._
419 1388 584000 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT -- __ ._ _. ._ __
__ 419 1388 585800 COSTMATlBSERVICES CALCl/LATEDAiAGGREGATELEVEL
-- TAL E /MEER / N R NTAL�lE(`sULAT�Y—�------- ------.- ---- -- ---_ _ _
DEDUCTIONS FOR NON-0&M ITEMS:
�PITA�
569800 COST MATL & SERVICES CALCULATED AT AGGREGATE LEVEL
TOTAL CAPITAL __ -- __ ��------�-�- ._ - __ _. --
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS �� - ---� —��------- -- '
Page 3 of 5
� � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
� � � � � � �
OPERAT/ONS AND 1VlAINTENANCE EXPENSES
DEiA/LED COST CENTER PROJECTIONS
SCHEDULE8
SOURCE: BURTON 8 ASSOCIATES __ ____ C:\12310ATA1CLWST011REPORT110101EX.WK4 09/08/2002
_ FISCAL YEAR ENDMC, SEPTEMBER 30,
COST OOJlCT 20p9 2002 Z003 2004 Y005 ]008
FUND ClNTlR COD[ ACCOUNT plSCRIpT10N lSTIMATC PROJECTCD PROJECtED VROJlCTCQ PROJlCTED PROJCCTlD
..-_- 1090 P(!$L/C W�ORK3 / STORMWATER (/T/LlTY
419 2090 570100 FULLTIMESALARIES&WAGES � 890,43Q � 1,043,400 1,100,787 1,191,330 1,225,203 1,292,590
419 2090 510400 SPECIAL PAY -- __ _. __ __ ._
419 2090 570500 OVERTIME 11,950 14,4d0 15,234 18,072 78,958 17,889
419 2090 510800 VACATION LEAVE -- •_ ._ ._ ._ _.
419 2090 510700 SICKLEAVE -. _ _ __ _ ._
419 2090 510800 OTHER PAID LEAVE -- .-
419 2690 S116Q0 FSIAOVERTIME - •. _ ._ _ _.
. 419 2090 512200 INJURYTIME -- ._ _� ._ _. ..
419 2090 512300 FUNERAL TIME -- .- __ __ __ __
419 2090 512500 JURYHOIIDAY -- ._ ._ ._ __ _.
419 2090 512700 NOLIDAYTIME -- •. ._ ._ __ __
418 2D90 520100 LIFE INSURANCE-EMP/PENS 290 310 327 345 384 3&i
419 2090 520200 1%LIFEINSURANCE-EMPLOYEE 4,570 4,620 4,874 5,142 5,425 5,723
419 2090 520300 SAMP IIFE 1NSURANCE 90 90 95 100 106 11t
419 2090 52�400 MAJOR MEpiCALINS-EMP 101,700 121,800 139,232 152,459 188,943 182,802
419 2090 520600 SOCIALSECURITY-EMPLOYEE 14,D7Q 15,380 16,228 17,118 18,080 19,053
419 2090 520700 EMP PENSION PLAN 62,150 88,900 71,848 75,797 79,968 84,384
419 2090 520900 WORIWIAN&COMPENSATION 15,600 18,710 19,739 20,825 21,970 23,178
419 2090 521000 DISABILITYINSURANCE 380 380 401 423 448 471
4'18 2090 521500 MEDICALEXAMINATIONS -- -• .. .. .. ..
419 2090 530100 PROFESSIONALSERVICES 5,900 8,000
419 2090 530300 OTHER COtdTRACTUAL SERV 914,500 152,800 157,178 181,893 188,750 971,753
419 2090 540100 GARAGESERVICES 485,220 480,270 480,982 502,828 525,245 548,881
419 2090 540200 DOCUMENT REPRODUCT�ON 200 ZQO 2(J9 218 228 � 239
419 2090 540300 TEl..EPHONE SERVICE VARIABLE 650 6,100 8,375 8,661 8,961 7,27q
419 2090 5A0400 MESSEPIGER SERVICE -- -- __ __ _ ..
419 2090 540500 RADIO SVC-FIXED 7,230 -- -- _ __ ..
419 2090 540800 TELEPHONE SVC FIXED �470 1280 1,338 1,398 1,461 1,528
419 209i0 540900 RISKMGMTSERVICE 6,itp 8,510 6,803 7,108 7,429 7,783
419 2090 541000 CISCHARGE 2$,7t0 29,680 31,204 32,608 34,075 35,809
419 2090 5d1100 BLDG 8 MAINT DEPT SVC FX -- -- _ __ ._ _.
419 2090 54130Q PRINT SHOP SVCS 200 200 209 218 228 239
419 2090 541400 PURCHASING SVC -- -- __ _ .. __
419 2090 541500 GARAGE VARtABLE 4,000 22,880 23,761 24,787 25,882 27,048
419 2090 5417� RADIOSERVICE-VARIABLE 560 - -- - ._ _.
419 2090 541800 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE 254,860 328,610 341,516 356,885 372,945 389,727
419 2090 541900 MESSENGER SVC-VARIABLE -- -- _ __ ._ _.
419 2090 542000 EMP RELATIONS SWC 3,010 5,16p 5,392 5,835 5,888 8,153
419 2090 5423Q0 GAS,WATER � SANITATION UTl 100 100 103 10& 109 N3
419 2090 542500 POSTAGE -- .. ._ __ __ __
419 2090 542700 INTERPD SVC CHG-OTHER FUND � -- -- .. __ .. _
419 2090 542800 INTERFD OTHER SERV CHGS 675,700 889,410 720,433 752,853 786,731 822,134
419 209Q 542900 �NTERFD ADMIN SERVICE CHG 1'18,730 257,240 288,816 280,813 293,554 � 308,783
419 2090 543200 OTHER PROMOTION ACTIVITY 100 �00 103 106 109 113
419 2080 543400 PRiNTING & BlNDING 100 100 103 108 109 113
�
� �
Page 4 of 5
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWA'T�R, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
OPERAT/ONS AND MA/NTENAIVCE EXPENSES
DETAILED COST CENTEF2 PROJECTIONS
SCHEDULEB
SOURCE_BURTON 8. ASSOCIATES _____ __ __ C:\123�DATAICLWST01U2EPOR11110101FJC.WK4 03/08/2002
FISCAL YEAR ENDMG SEPTEMBER 30,
COST 06.f[GT 2001 2002 200J 2004 2005 Z006
FUND ClNTlR. COD! ACCOUNT D6ECRIPTION �STIMATC PROJlCTlD PROJlCTlD PROJlCTlD VROJlCTlD PROJECTlD
419 2090 543500 COUNTYDUMPFEE 15,000 20,000 20,800 21,278 21,855 22,510
419 2090 543800 FINESANDPENALTIES •- __ _.
419 2090 544100 EQUIPT RENTAL 12,000 12,400 92,772 13,155 13,550 13,958
419 2090 545100 SUNDRY INSURANCE 26,440 d8,400 49,852 51,348 52,888 54,475
419 2090 548200 OTNEREQUIPSVC&REPAIR 3,000 3,000 3,090 3,183 3,278 3,377
419 2080 546800 R& R INGROUND FACIL -_ __ _
419 2090 547100 UNIFORMS-EMPLOYEE 5,600 8,800 9,084 9,338 9,618 9,904
419 2090 547200 TRAVEL EXPENSE-EMP 2,500 2,800 2,878 2,758 2,841 2,928
419 2090 547300 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 10D 100 103 108 108 113
419 2090 547400 MEALS-EMPLQYEE 100 100 t03 108 1Q8 113
419 2090 547900 STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS 3,820 -- -- _
419 2090 548100 BAD DEBT EXPEPISE __ __ ..
419 2090 548200 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE ' __ _ ._ __ __ __
419 2090 5488Q0 LOSS OF DISPOSAL OF FIXED ASSETS -- __ .. __ ._ __
419 2090 550400 OPERATING SUPPLIES & MATLS 184,300 200,p00 20B4O00 212,180 218,545 225,102
419 2090 550500 FUEL __ _. _. __ __ ..
419 2090 557100 MEMBERSHIPiSUBS-EMP 1,110 1,450 1,185 1,220 1,257 1,294
419 2080 557200 OFFICL RECOGNITION-EMP 190 320 330 339 350 380
419 2090 557300 TRAWGBREFERENCE-EMP � 4,400 5,290 5,449 5,812 5,781 5,954
419 2090 559400 PRIOR 1R ENGPURCHASES � -- _ _
418 2090 584000 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT CALCULATEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
419 2090 564200 FURNITURE&OFCEQUIPMENT CALCULATEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
419 2090 569600 CONTRA ACCT-CAP COST CALCULATED AT AGGREGATE CEVEL
419 2090 571300 PRINCIPAL-LEASEDEQUIPMENT CALCULATEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
419 2090 572300 INTEREST-LEASEDEQUIPT CALCUtATEDArAGGREGATElEVEL
419 2090 590800 CONTR TO 181 &/OR CIP FNp CACCULArEOATAG�REGATELEVEL
419 2090 591000 CONTRIBTOGARAGEFUND CALCULATEDATAGGRECaA7ELEVEL
-- To� u wvoR�rs r w ieRUriurr -__ �s�s,rzo ��3�eio -�;r���-�srrqz� ���3- a���o�
DEDUCTIONS FOR NON-08M ITEMS:
A AL
584000 MACHtNERYBEQUiPMENT CALCULATEDATAGGRE6ATELEVEL
584200 FURNITURE80FCEQUIPMENT CALCULA7EDAiAGGREGATELEVEL
569800 CONTRAACCT-CRPCOST CAlCULATEDATAGGRE�ATELEVEC
571300 PRINCIPAL-�EASEDEQUIPMENT CALCULAiEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
572300 INTEREST-IEASED EQUIPT CALCULATEDATAGGREGAiELEVEL
590800 CONTRT01818JORCIPFND CALCULAiEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
591000 CONTRIBTOGARAGEFUNCS CALCilLATEDATAGGREGATELEVEL
TOTAL CAPITAL � - --- - -
-- -- - ----------------------------- --
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS __ _ __ __ ._ __ �
IlEMS NOT /NCLUDED /N 08M EXpEN8E3
479 1385 5840pp MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT
419 1385 590200 INTERFUND TRANSFER
419 1385 5921Q0 PRINC-TSFTOSKGFUND
419 1385 592200 INT-TSF TO SKG FUND
A19 2090 584000 MACHINERY&EQUTAMENT
419 2090 571300 PRINCIPAL-LEASED EQUIPMENT
419 2090 5723p0 INTEREST-LEASED EQUIPT
419 2090 591000 CONTRIB TO GARAGE FUND
'dDf
35,000
209,240
118,75D
397,&40
41,200
120,870
22,400
31,500
asa,00�
70% QLs�1��n
42,800 OUrer Sources (Uses) of Funds
218,240 CakWated by rtmtlel
124,580 Used Official Statement fw 1999 Bonds
393,090 Used Official Shatemerrt for 1999 Bonds
A6,100 Otl�r Sources (Uses) of F�ds
151,640 Other Sou�ces (Uses) of Ftmds
27,980 Other Sources (Uses) ot Furids
24,900 Other Sources (Uses} of Funds
93,000 TOTAL TO OTHER SOURCES (U9ESJ
BS,dBDO FROM/bODEL
(72,000) VAR
Page 5 of 5
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
City of Clearwater, Florida
Stotmwater Utility Enterprise Fund
Revenue Account Balance Available for Appropriation
September 30, 2000 (a)
FINAL PLAN
UNRESTRICTED CURRENT ASSETS: '
CASH ON HAND AND IN BANKS
EQUITY IN POOLED CASH 1 INVEST.
T07AL RECEIVABLES, NET
DUE FROM 07HER FUNDS
DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS
INVENTORIES
PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER
- —
----------- --
------ -- -_----
TOTAL
SCHEDULE 9
563, 000
703,000
1,604,000
�z9o7o,000
��RH�L�1T_Ll_9�1�.LTIE�PA_Y_A��FF�Q�IJ_�_lV�TRI�T���! REN�S,�_T�;.
ACCOUNTS/CONTRACTS PAYABLE 232,000
ACCRUED PAYROLL 24,000
ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES 71,000
DUE TO OTHER FUIVDS
TOTAL-- -- ------------ _ _ ----------- -- -- - —
$327 000
UNRESTRtCTED WORKING CAPITAL _ 2 543 000
ADJUSTMENTS: --
DEDUCT UNBILLED ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (392,000)
OTHER DEDUCTIONS
ADD: WORKING CAPITAL CLASSIFIED RS RESTRICTED, BUT AVAILABLE FOR CIP 322,000
ADD: ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES 71,000
UNRESTRICTED WORKING CAPITAL AVAILABLE FOR APPROPRIATION �2� 4 ppp
(a) Account balances from balance sheet at September 30, 200Q, and supplemental information from Public Works.
Source: Burton & Associates C:1123\DATAICLWST01\REPORT1110101EX.WK4
o3iosiaooa
Page 1 of 1
� � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTTLITY SYSTEM
� � � � �
INVESTIVIENT EARN/NGS CALCULAT/ONS
8F1/ENUE ACCOUNT IN�LUD/NG ClF LES�QND FUNOS •
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
FUNDS USED (GENERATED) DURING YEAR:
CURRENT FLOW
APPLIED TO CIP
2,544,000 10,156,000
16,677,000 30,656,000
� �
18,120,000
21,247,000
�
��
16,935,000
6,623,000
� � � �
SCHEDULE 10
8,696,000 6,023,OOQ
6,483,000 3,490,000
(11,468,000) (7,726,000
AVERAGE TOTAL EARNINGS RATE 5.50% 5.50% 5.00% 4.50°k 4.00% 4.00%
INDICATED INVESTMENT EARNINGS 349,000 477,000 869,000 388,000 248,000 104,000
BONQ�l1ND_ �
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR N/A (7,029,000} (16,354,000) -- (5,332,000)
PROCEEDS DURING YEAR 22,687,000 22,226,000 - 7,978,000
PERGENTAGE OF YEAR PROCEEDS ARE AVAILABLE 50.00% t00.Q0°k 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
TIME-WEIGHTED PROCEEDS — - -- -------- _ 22,687,000 -- -- -- -- 22,226,000 - -------- - - — — 7,978,000
NOMIPJAL AMOUNT APPLIED TO CIP (6,934,000) (16,077,000) (15,955,000) (6,001,000) (5,227,000} (2,698,OOQ}
CfP EXPENDITURES APPLIED FIRST TO AVAILABLE BALANCE - 7,029,000 - 16,354,000 - 5,332,000
CIP EXPENDITURES APPLIED NEXT TO PROCEEDS (6,934,000) (23,106,000) (15,955,000) (22,355,000) (5,227,000} (8,030,000)
WEIGHTED EXPENDITURES APPLIED TO PROCEEDS (3,467,000) f23.106_000� r�F a�� nnm /99 9r.�C !1l1/11 �c ��> �„�� .m „�.. ,,,....
�� on�.nrv�.w (1,734,000) 7,619,000 (7,978,000) 2,871,000 (2,614,Ofl0) 1,297,000
AVERAGE TOTAL EARNINGS RATE 5.50% 5.50% 5.00°h 4.50% 4.00% 4.00%
INDICATED INVESTMENT EARNINGS - --- —"-- -
($95,000) i $419,000 ($399,000) $129,000 ($105,000) $52,000
It�YE�INl€LtLE9RdLM�_.B CA
REVENUE ACCOUNT INCLUDING CIF LESS BOND FUNDS: 349,000 , 477,000 869,000 388,000 248,000 104,000
TOTAL NON-80ND FUNDS -- -----
497,000 477,000 - 869,000 388,000 248,000 104,000
BOND FUNDS __ (95,000) ___ 419,000 (399,000) 129,000 ____(105,000) ____ _ 52,000
TOTAL INVESTMENT EARNINGS – -- - --
402,000 896,000 470,000 517,000 143,000 156,000
Page 1 of 1
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM
ESTIMATED EXPENDI TURES FROM CAPITAL �UNDS
SCHEDULE 11
FINAL PLAN
SOURCE: BURTON &ASSOCIATES C:\1231DATAICLWST011REPORT1110101EX.WK4 03/06/2002
_ ____ FISCAL YEAR ENDING 3EPTEMBER 30
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
ESTIMATE PROJECtED PROJECTED PROJHCTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
CAP/TAL /MIQRO �NTS FUND:
BEGINNING BALANCE -- 9,225,000 17,054,000 15,799,000 7,474,000 4,751,000
TRANSFERS-IN DURING YEAR _ 15,375,000 23,299,000 18,566,000 6,269,000 5,830,000 3,064,000
TOTAL 50URCES 15,375,000 32,524,000 35,620,000 22,068,000 13,304,000 7,815,000
ESTIMATED ANNUAL RATE OF EXPENDITURE OF NEW FUNDS _ 40.00% _ 40.00% 40.Q0°h 40.00°% 40.00% 40.00%
USED DURING YEAR __ _ 6,150,000 15,470,000 19,821,000 14,594,000 8,553,000 ^ 4,811,000
ENDING BALANCE _ 9,225,000 17,054,000 15,799,000 7,474,000 4,751,000 3,004,000
_ --- --- - - - - --- -
FY p�TA�p CALCyI,�JIONS:.
- -- ---- -- -- -- -=_---- - _..._ --- ---- -
2001 BEGINNING BALANCE _ __ _ _ _ _
ESTIMATED RATE OF EXPENDITURE 40.00%
USED DURING YEAR -- --
-- - - -- - -
TRANSFERS-IN DURING YEAR 15,375,000 9,225,000 3,075,000 - - _
ESTIMATED RA7E OF EXPENDITURE 40.00% •
USED DURING YEAR 6,150,000 6,150,000 3,075,000 -- -
2002 TRANSFERS-fN DURING YEAR , 23,299,000 13,979,400 M 4,659,800 - _
ESTIMATED RATE OF EXPENDITURE 40.00°k
USED DURING YEAR 9,319,500 9,319,600 4,659,800 - _
20D3 TRANSFER -IN DURING YEAR 18,566,000 11,739,600 3,713,200 -
ESTIMATED R,4TE OF EXPENDITURE 40.00%
USED DURING YEAR 7,426,400 7,426,400 3,713,200 --
200A TRANSFERS-�N DURING YEAR 6,269,000 3,761,400 1,253,840
ESTIMATED RATE OF fXPENDITURE 40.00%
USED DURING YEAR -- --- --
2,507,600 2,507,600 1,253,800
2005 TRANSFERS-IN DURING YEAR 5,830,000 3,498,000
ESTIMATED RATE OF EXPENDITURE 40.00°r6
USED DURING YEAR 2,332,ODU 2,332,000
2006 TRANSFERS-IN DURING YEAR 3,064,000
ESTIMATED RATE OF EXPENDITURE 40.00%
USED DURING YEAR 1,225,600
TOTAL USED IN EACH YEAR 6,150,000 15,469,600 19,821,000 14,593,800 8,552,800 4,811,400
Ciry of Clearwater Stormwater Utiliry
Revenue Sufficiency Analysis FY 2001- 2006
A��endix II
Page 13
Final Report — October 2001
Ordinance no. 6855-01 Adoptang increases in the
Stormtt�ater Rates
Burton & Associates
'
�
'
ll
'
ORDINANCE NO. 6855-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE FOR
STORMWATER UTILITY RATES; AMENDING APPENDIX
A, ARTICLE XXV PUBLIC WORKS--FEES, RATES AND
CHARGES; SECTION (3)(e) STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT UTILITY RATES, CLEARWATER CODE
OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
' WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater's Stormwater Utility was established effective
1991 and on August 6, 1998 Ordinance 6309-98 was passed increasing Stormwater
Utility rates to $4.00 per ERU beginning 10/1/98 and establishing a series of four
' subsequent 4.3 per cent increases to be effective 10/1/1999 ($4.17), 10/1/2000 ($4.35),
10/1/2001 ($4.54) and 10/1/2Q02 ($4.73); and
� WHEREAS, the revenue su�ciency and financial forecast analysis in 1998
captioned that funding a$30 Million capital improvements program every 5 years after
FY 2003 would require a perpetual annual rate increase of from 11 % to 11.5%, and
' Burton and Associates has completed a five year revenue sufficiency update and
financial forecast analysis which recommends early consideration of a rate increase
' due to higher than anticipated infrastructure, operating and maintenance costs, and
additional capital improvemenfiLOSts beyond what had originally been projected and
approved; and
'
'
C
'
'
'
'
�l
'
WHEREAS, the increases are necessary to provide funding for $72.4 million of
capital improvement projects to abate severe street and in structure flooding, improve
water quality, add, restore or upgrade stormwater infrastructure and comply with
mandated changes in operating, maintenance and reporting requirements; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE GITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. Appendix A, Article XXV, PUBLIC WORKS--FEES, RATES AND
CHARGES, Section (3)(e) Stormwater Management Utility Rates, Clearwater Code of
Ordinances, is amended as follows:
(3} Rates:
(e} Stormwater management utility rates. The stormwater management utility rates
shall be based upon the revenue requirements for the construction,
administration, management, engineering, operation and maintenance of the
stormwater management system, and the adopted capital improvement program
Ordinance No. 6855-01
', n 12— 4-01 ; 9: 07Ai��; C I TY CLERK DEPT. ; 72 i 552 40�6 *F 2/ %
'
funding needs o� fihe system. For the purposes of these rates, the t�rms shall
' have #he meanings set forth in section 32.242 or, if not d�fined in section 32.242,
in sections 32.002 dr � .02.
'
'
,
2.
'
'
'
1. Basic rate. The rate per month for dne equival�nt residential unit or ERU
shal[ be established as specified below:
� �- �
'
'
Residential property fees. The monthly fee far each residential property shall be:
3. Nonresidenfial property fees. Nonresidenfiial praperty shall be charged on the
basis a€ the impenrious area of the property in accordanc� with the �Follvwing
formula:
' 4.
'
,
t
'
��
t
lmpervious a�ea (sq. ft.) divided by 1,830 sq. ft. = Number of ERU's. A
minimum value af 1.0 ERU sha11 b� assigned fiv each nonresidential
property. The impenrious area of each nonresidential properky sh2�ll be as
determined by the city engineer. ERU's shall be round�d to the nearest
one-tenth of a unit.
Undeveldped pr�perty. Stormwafier management utility fees sh�ll not be I�vi�d
�gainst undev�loped praperty pursuant io this ar�icle.
Section 2. This ardinance shal! take effect immediateEq upon adoptian.
PASSED ON FIRST READENG �aVember 1, 2Q071
2 Ordi��nce No. 6855-01
'
1
'
'
�
'
'
'
,
,
'
'
,
'
'
'
�
,
�
1
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
1�i.ereby c;,rtify that tE�is i;? tcaa ard
eorrect copy cf the o�ieinal �:s it a.pnears
in ths: files of thc Ciiv o; Ciearwzter.
'i,�Vitness my har.d aad official seal af
Khe. t of Clea.w ter.
'T �j.�day of � , r(,
- �
epaty ,ry c�� ^ � `-�..��--'
Approved as to form:
November 15, 2001
Brian J Aun
Mayor-Go issioner
Attest:
%i _ ,
ane C. Hayman ynt ia E. Goudeau
Assistant City Attorney � "ity Clerk
3
Ordinance No. 6855-01
'
'
,
�
'
'
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
City of Clearwater Stormwater dltilfty
Revenue SuJficiency Analysis FY 20�1- 2006
� 1 1' '• 1
Page 14
F'inal Repart — October 2001
Detailed Descriptions �f Stormwater Capital
Im�ravernents Pr°ojects
Bu�ton & ass�C��tes
;'
'
�
�
'1
;1
`''
1
1
�
'
'
'
.;'
1
1
1
1
1
�IT� aF �LE.�R�ATE�.
ENGINEERING DEI'Al�TMENT
Environgnental and Sto�mtivater 1Vlanagement
Five Year Capital
Water Resource Projects Improvements
�
0
SUIVIMARY
FY 2002 — 2006
� �J��i�l 1' 1'
U
'
'
�
,
'
�
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... i
Structure Floodit�g Improvement Projects .................................................................................................... 3
Myrtle Avenue Drainage and Roadway Improvements Project ........................................................... 4
Kapok Flood Resolution Project ........................................................................................................... 6
TownPond ............................................................................................................................................ 8
Sharkey Road Drainage Improvement Project .................................................................................... 10
Alligator Creek Drainage Improvements ............................................................................................ 12
Stevenson Creek Implementation Phase I ........................................................................................... 14
Morningside — Meadows Drainage Improvements ............................................................................. 16
Tropic Hills Drainage Improvements ................................................................................................. 18
Allen's Creek Neighborhood Flooding ............................................................................................... 20
StreetFlooding Projects .............................................................................................................................. 22
N. Greenwood Corridor Stormwater Enhancement Project ................................................................ 23
Storm Pipe System Replacement Projects .......................................................................................... 25
North Beach Drainage Improvements ...............................
.................................................................. 27
Regulatory Compliance Projects ................................................................................................................ 29
FDEPCompliance .............................................................................................................................. 30
BridgeFlooding Projects ............................................................................................................................ 32
MajorErosion Projects ............................................................................................................................... 33
Allen's Creek Gabion Project ............................................................................................................. 34
Water Quality and Environmental Projects ................................................................................................ 36
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration ................................................................................................. 37
Alligator Creek Implementation Projects ........................................................................................... 39
North Greenwood Stormwater Retrofit ............................................................................................... 41
OtherProjects ............................................................................................................................................. 43
Storm System Expansion Project ........................................................................................................ 44
AppendixA ................................................................................................................................................. 46
Review and Approval Process
AppendixB ................................................................................................................................................. 48
Strategic Objectives/Measures/Targets
AppendixC ................................................................................................................................................. 50
Stormwater Utility Project List
AppendixD ................................................................................................................................................. 54
Capital Improvements Program
Introduction
The City of Clearwater implemented a
Stormwater Utility Fee in FY 1991 to pay the
cost of stormwater drainage facilities to be
constructed City-Wide and to pay the cost of
operation, monitoring, enforcement,
administration and maintenance of the
stormwater drainage facilities of the City. (Ord.
No. 5058-90) The surrunary document is
intended to be an annual review document for
the Clearwater City Comrriission that describes
studies or projects being considered or developed
by the Engineering Deparhnent, in conjunction
with Public Service, Drainage and
Transportation. This summary document will
not describe program funding related to
operational costs, rather it will describe the
planned projects as outlined in the City Capital
Improvement Budget and planned Rate Study
Bond Improvements commencing in FY 2002
through FY 2006, inclusive.
The primary purpose for this document is to
provide the Clearwater City Commission with a
clear understanding of the purpose, justification,
and scope of planned Capital Improvement
Project (CIP) expenditures. It is also intended to
provide the City Commission the opportunity to
review and provide conceptual approval of those
planned watershed studies and water resource
projects being considered for development. City
Staff regard City Commission acceptance of this
document and any subsequent CIP budget and
rate study projects approvals as direction to
proceed to acquire grant funding for project
development as may become available. The
emphasis in describing planning and
improvement projects in this document is on
projects that City Staff are actively pursuing
through the Stormwater Capital Projects Review
and Approval Process (Appendix "A") and that
exceed a total project cost of $100,000.
Operational projects of any amount (GIS Project)
and projects less than $100,000, while listed on
each chapter cover, are not specifically described
in this document.
This document is intended to provide only brief
project descriptions. Chapters are organized
based on the Engineering Department's
stormwater project "Problem Classification and
Ranking Priority", depicted in Table l.
Priorit Problem Classi�cation
1 Structure Flooding
2 Street Floodine
Major Erosion
Water Quality & Environmental
Other
Table 1. Ranking Priority
Project and problem priorities are presented in
the page header information for each project.
The City Comrriission priority reflects the City
Commission Strategic Objective "Key Intended
Outcome" (KIO}. The higher the KIO priority
score the greater is the Commission prionty.
The KIO priority scores were established during
development of the Stormwater Utility
Entetprise Fund Business Plan in March 2001.
The Cortunission priority score reflects those
"Key Intended Outcome" factors that might be
addressed by implementation of the project being
considered. For example: The Town Pond
project would certainly leverage private
development funding through the City
Commission approved "Regional Retention
District" overlay, thereby satisfying that one City
Commissron KIO to meet the "Major
Infrastructure Maintenance and Improvements"
strategic objective. In that instance, the KIO
would be given a score of one. The fmal KIO
score is the summation of each KIO priority
score for each Commission Strategic Objective
KIO that the project is expected to satisfy. The
maximum score that any project could possibly
receive is twenty-three (23). A summary of the
City Commission Strategic Objectives and
corresponding KIO's is listed in Appendix "B".
In conjuncrion with City Commission KIO's is
included the problem classification and priority
score, established by the Engineering
Deparhnent, Capital Improvement Stormwater
Management Steering Committee (CISM). That
score not only establishes a rank based on the
project classification, but also recommends the
order for completion of projects based on project
technical constraints. For example: using Table
1 above, a project to resolve structure flooding
would receive a problem priority score of one
point zero, zero (1.00). Project implementation
would then follow in order with one point zero-
one (1.01) being the first project through one
point nine-nine (1.99) being the last project to be
completed within that problem classification
series. Technical project constraints are critical
to the successful completion of infrastructure
improvements for public safety reasons and
therefore are considered and ranked in every
project priority decision.
General project descriprions and locations, with
pictures or graphics, where appropriate, are
provided. Each description provides a brief
explanation of the project, the proposed project
objectives, current project status, and brief fiscal
information. In order to provide brief, yet
informed descriptions, certain caveats are
necessary:
1. This document reflects both Staff
recommendations for project priority, as
depicted in Table 1, and the Key Intended
Outcome (KIO) ranking score defined by the
City Comrnission and interpreted by Staff as
major priority areas for this fiscal year. 'Fhe
strategic objectives of the Commission
include: (1) Public Safety; (2) Economic
Development; (3) Quality of Life; (4)
Infrastructure Maintenance; (5) Human
Resources. VUhere differences between the
two ranking priorities are apparent, City
Commission priorities superpose the ranking
of projects depicted in Table 1.
2. Descriptions are designed to be brief and
objective. They are clearly not
comprehensive evaluations.
3. The listing of proposed water resource
projects reflect primarily structural solutions
to address the documented "primary
purpose". It is stressed that structural
solutions currently being considered do not
preclude changing to non-structural
solutions at a later date, as circumstances
and priorities may change.
4. The project status reflects either the actual
project status or the anticipated next step of
the process where that next step is imminent.
5. Fiscal summaries are to be considered
project estimates only and are subject to
change and City Commission approval
through the budget and project review
process.
li
6. A summary of all stormwater problems
throughout Clearwater is listed in
APPENDIX "C". That list is complete as
of FY'O1 and includes projects to address
water resource problems documented
through either City watershed management
plans, as required by the City
Comprehensive Plan, or based on citizen
expressed complaints, This doesn't preclude
future changes to the list due to unplanned
circumstances.
Q
Secured funding represents a funding
expectation that has been either approved by
the City Commission or has a signed
interagency agreement by the supporting
agency, but not yet approved by City
Commission. Un-secured cost share
information reflects an expectation that
while not specifically approved by City
Commission or through interlocal
agreement, is included for planning putposes
in agency budgets or long range planning
documents. Grants that have only been
applied for and having no agency
commitment have not been included in the
fiscal summary of projects.
Where funding has been approved for cost
share by others and the City of Clearwater is
also the lead agency, the City is resporisible
for the initial payment of ALL project
related costs, followed by subsequent
participant reimbursement.
For each project, the "Needed to Complete"
line item included in each project summary
represents a line item project cost that has
been modeled in the rate study. That table
of all projects planned for and included in
the rate study update is provided as
APPENDIX "D".
S�T'R�.JGTURE FL,C�ODII�IC
I M PRO�IE lVI �l�i'T'
PR�JEGTS
Project
Myrtle Avenue Drainage and Roadway Improvements
Proj ect
Kapok Flood Resolution Project
Town Pond
Sharkey Road Drainage Improvement Project
Alligator Creek Drainage Improvements
Stevenson Creek Implementation Projects, Phase I
Morningside Meadows Drainage Improvement Project
Tropic Hills Drainage Improvement Project
Allens Creek Neighborhood Flooding Project
3
Commission
Priority
13
11
11
10
9
9
9
8
8
TOTAL:
Project Cost
$11,104,000
$16,688,000
$13,030,000
$900,000
$4,424,044
$6,090,500
$575,000
$550,000
$600,000
��� � , . .
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Myrtle Ave. Drainage and Roadway Improvement
Project
Brian Barker
City of Clearwater
Coastal Zone 1
Commission (KIO) 13 Problem Priority 1.01
CIP — City, Project Development
Structure Flooding, Street Flooding
Description: The Myrtle Avenue Drainage and
Roadway Improvement Project will consist of
the reconstruction of approximately 2.4 miles of
a major north/south roadway through downtown
Clearwater between Lakeview Rd. to the south
and Ft. Harrison Ave. to the north, including
replacement of the substandard stormwater
conveyance system. Myrtle Avenue is scheduled
to be designated as Alt US 19 after a planned
road exchange occurs with the FDOT. The
Roadway improvement project must be
completed before re-designation takes place.
The proposed improvements will reduce flood
hazard along the corridor, removing 18
properties from flooding in the 100 year storm
event and flooding of 17 street locations during
the 10 year event. Implementation will improve
the viability for re-development. By improving
the stormwater system through the proposed
Myrtle Avenue project and in concert with the
planned Town Pond improvements, these vacant
or under perfornung parcels will become
attractive developmenUredevelopment sites for
new businesses, bringing an increase in
economic productivity to the Clearwater
community.
Objectives:
1. Reduce flood hazards along the Myrtle
Avenue corridor by replacing failing and
undersized stormwater infrastructure.
2. Improve the viability of the Myrtle Avenue
corridor by becoming an amactive site for
business re-development.
3. Bring Myrtle Avenue up to current FDOT
specifications in order to exchange Myrtle
Avenue for Fort Harrison Ave.
�
STATUS
FY 2001: The drainage plan for Myrtle Avenue,
Myrtle Avenue Stormwater Improvement
Project, was completed in August 2001. The
City is currently negotiating with CDM for
design construcrion plan preparation. The City
has applied for FDOT funding through the
Transportation Outreach Program to fund $5.4
million of road improvements, leveiaging
stormwater revenues to obtain road improvement
funding.
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost _
Planning $ 49 500
Design Engineering/Pernuts $1,255,000
Land Acquisition
Construction $9,100,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $11,104.000
Funding from Others 0%
Secured
Unsecured
Total Other Funding $0
City Share 100%
Roadway Funding $ 1,049,500
Stormwater Utility $ 9,355,000
Total Ciry Funding $11,104,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUND/NG �11,104�000
Requirements
Total Project Cost $11,104,000
Less Roadway Funding $ 1,049,500
Expended Through 09/30/00 $
Needed to Complete 9.355,000
1
,
'
,
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
,
'
,
'
'
�_l
'
,
,
,
1
1
1
1
1
�
�
1
1
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
�[���� A����� ���.���.� �r���°��v����� ��°���c�
� ��
�
� � ,- :�
�� � � •'�
:� �`
�
� .. ' � �.
-�� i �.
, �.
A,
ti � b _
$ ,y N
Y" Y
� h��� � Y'i �.
t �� j
g n �
'� ,,.r, � 4 , .�`� � ■-
� >rx Pe i�- rt ':� ;i*
4t
i � �,... . .�fa t . _ .._ �
: .�k��a�'" v'� : "-,. r� t ir ' � � ra � s�"�'� �r"P��iw�= T .
����� �
� x �,* s t � x . . -
� ��'.� `� _ ,z x��` ,'a � :
s.i� � a
-� ,...b
„
, . _ "__... ....,..,,:a � �:�,--'
5
. �: �_;..
�� � ��= -r ,
� s� :�, ;
:,
• r
'•� �- a,
. :y .
�Cas���c �lom� Re��lution Prmjec�
�erry �=€r��h
vety af �iearvvater
�,i!ig�tar �reek
�ommission (K60) 11 Probie►n �'ri�rit� '6,05
CIP � Joir�tY Ir�terioca! Agreement
Flooc� Gontrol, Water Quality/Environmenta!
�nhan�ement
Description: The Friendly Viliage of I�apok is
located in the Alligat��r Creek Basin and was
identified and prioritizF,d in the "Compz•ehensive
Watershed Manageme.nt Plan for the Alligatoz
Ci�eek Watershed" (June 1997). The pr-oject was
developed cooperativ�ely witli the City of
Clearwater, Puiellas County and the Soutl�west
Florida Water Management District. Flr�oding of'
flie Park is recoguized :ror its severity, frequency,
and uuznber of affecte,d residents. Removal of the
Park will eliininate potential floodiilg for 20Q
n�obile l�omes, 3�ridges and 497 properties
upsh-eani including, for exarnple, College FIill
Estates. The project w�ouId involve the purchase
of tl�e i�lobile l7oine par'k and the relocation of the
l�esidents, allowing for fToodplain restoi°atiou;
wetland creation and habitat iin�rovement, water
quality unprovenlent, aild recreation and
education facilities. The conceptual plan
proposes tlle recreation of a�proximately 25
acres of wetland and would restore tlle area.
Cibaectives:
1, Resolve pr�perty flooding.
2. I'�emc�ve the existing Clif:f` Ste�,hei�s �ark�_
control weir.
3. Reconshuct a lone�,er weir to reduce the 10,
25 and 100 year flaod elevatioils upstream.
4. Excavate the project site for wettand.
c�eution and also provide additional
floodplaui storage voluzne triat ���ill serve tc
attenuate tha pEak fl.ow raY.e in tl�e
downst�eam chann�el.
5, Allow for flle resolution of upsh�arr,
flooding of approx:imately 497 structures.
6, E��llance the water quality treatment
function of the existing and proposed
stormwater faciliYies at Cliff Stephens Park
and Moccasiil Lake Park, thereby protecting
Tampa Bay, an Estuary of National
Significailce, ,3.W.LM. Waterbody,
Outstai�ding Florida Water and Aquatic
Preserve.
G
�
FY 20Q1: I'unding for the design and
coilstr•uction of the project has been. approved iiz
the SWFWMD Five Year Plai�. Funding %i
$3.5 million for properry acquisition has been
applied for through Florida Forever; however,
the status of this fui�ding will not be ?niow�7 until
Jazluary 2002.
���CAL Sl�lV�I�A��`
�r�ject �as�
Plainling
�esign Engiizeering/Permits � 500,�(�0
Acquisition Relocation & Mgt. � 2,688,000
I,and Acquisition - Ap��-aised $ 4,�00,000
Relocation $ 2,500,000
Consh-uction $ 2,500,000
Reserve $ 4,000,000
� � ..� � �� ', �.a2: �J�1�
��r�slen� ��-orn ��h�y � 1 �%
Secured
SWFWMD (Connact Pen�ing) � 500,000
iJnsecured
State $ 2,500,000
Total �tlaei� Fu�zding $ 3,000,000
Citj( �hai� �2°�a
Stormwater Utility $13,688,OQ0
s ot�el C'iry Fu�zdiiag $13,688,QC?�
• + •-1 i' r �:: 11
�2eq�irernenfis
Total Project Cost �16,688,OU0
Ex��ended Tlu-augh C19/30/�C) $ 0
Needed to Complete. _ I6 688 0�0
'�J
1
�
,�
�
'
'I�
'
'
�I
I�
�
C'�
�
'
�
ll
,
'
�
1 I
1
1
1
1
1
�
1
1
1
'
'
�
'
�
'
1
��.��� ����� ���������� ��°�����
��
� r�
� �
h
� �"Y�����
�
�; o �
r M ���
`, � <.a:��"
� � � � sa a �
� �Y � ���� �-
�' `_
,;
� F�r :.�
� �,f �, �
�. #: � � �., y„,:.
� � „t;
1 ���,, F.f �:'
v
� v
� •
N � .;�'� � ��. _1
,
�}i"" h.,•, . /.� . ,. ��' ..
�,�.;.,'�''
%�F .. �" ^� a. � - x''�''n �p' �. `
� �- � ' � 7 � .r� _ , � r+ � $Cp �, } / t ^ � 3
'� �: �q ,t x � '�����# �,�.� �;:.
�+: t �,f. �``��' � � i:4' �# u� i''" ' � -� .. ;
RY "� f . ' q� � e q . `. ._
�.. � - i -� � x"' �'�''� \:.
� t � � � ��� ,t� � tl � � �`�
:�u �, ec.�. (�
_ *�.si,.,� 1. „���,,;,,��."
,y�- �r ;. . Pi� j
E' § J,,,•r'u A`.1
� � �.,� �;
A ti
;
� � �
� . � � �
�.. �. ;�, ,� :,_ � _
f
, � �. j
.s
, ,� 1• _�
,�: .
�� � ���- �
���.. � ���,� �
���ry �irscF�
�ity of �E�ar°vua�er
�c�askal �c�ne 1
��mms��i�n (FC60) �� l�roble� F�rior6ty 1.00
CIP � Jc�ir�k, t?esign
V1later C�ualiiy @mprovement, F9oodinc�
Description: The Town Pond project is an
integral part of the plan to invigorate the
dovv�ltown area and prc�n�ote developizlent. The
do�nitown area was de�veloped wi.th little o?- no
landscapiug, with significant asphalt and.
impervious surfaces and no provision fol- flood
proCection or stormwate:r quality treahnent, As a
result the area is subject to frequent flooding and
the erisitng two acre pond, which persists with
nuisanee veffetation, is �esthetic�lly uzlpl€:asani�
arid genei-al1y poor wate:r quality.
T1�e project is for the canstzuction af a 4 acre
storn�water treatment pond and pa��lc an�ei�iry i��
downtown Cleaa�w:�ter to reduce existi.i�g
flooding problems ar,ld provide stonnwatei
treahne�it to protect t1�e tivater quallty of�
Clearwater I�arbor, an Outstanding �lorida
Waferbody. During the developmei�t of tlie
project and other downiown redeve.lopme,nt i1.
�=vas deteniuned that si�nificant inlprovements ta
the storm systein in Myrtle Avei�ue would also
be re�quired to m�et the desired level of seivice
for flood protecCion zlot �nly in the vicinity c�ftl�.�
Town Pond but also aloua 1vlyrtle Avenue
Const�uction of fllis facility will also �roir�ote a
`stot-u�water buy-in district' wiCliiia which
development and, or redevelopment �rojects can
make a payinent in-lieu-oi for City �u1d State�
stoz•mw<.ter heafnlent i-equireinents.
The u1�pi°oved site will incoipor�te laridsca�e
architecture amenities to creat� a pleasant
enviromuental setting ui downtown C�`Jeazwatea-.
Objectives;
1. Provide wa�er qu.ality t�eaYme�lt for the
Downtown Storir�water Service L�isr•ict
prior te discharge t�� Clearwater Harbor.
2. Reduce 1QCalized fJoodir�g.
3. Rede�-elopn�ei�t incenrive.
8
�
FY 2Q01: 7/Ol - Conunission approved
flie Agreement with FDEP for funding tluough
the Water Advisory Panel in tlie amount of
�400,000.
������ �������
�rojeck �ost
Plainung �r 20,OOU
Design Engilleering/P���n�its � 610,O�J0
Land Acquisition $ 2,700,000
Construction $ 7,700,OOU
Resei�ve� $ 2,OOO,Q00
� � �, � � .�, �
�e��d�r�g ff�°�� ���a��� 4��%
Secured
FDEP �- Sui-fa�e Water GraPst $ 40�J,OOQ
State - SWFWMI� 9� 3,105,000
I�ederal AppropriatioiZ � 1,295,000
�1►ts��uz ed
Econonuc Develaprnent Land Sale � 600,OOCi
`Buy-In" Storm �1.000,000
7'otal Otlaer I'uaxc�irig $ 6,400,OG0
Co�y �har� �1 %
Penny for Pinellas $ 1,500,000
jtormwater Utility $ 5,130,000,
�'��tal City �ie�iding $ 6,630,000
� i . . �, �, � ;� , �;
R�q�irerner���
Total Project Cost �13,030,000
Ex�ended Tluougl� 09/30/00 � 1,376,8�J9
Needed to Complete l I 653.191
,
�
'
L
'
�
'
',�J
'
�
'�J
�
'
'
�
,
�
'
�
�
'
�
�J
1
1
u
1
1
1
�
0
1
�J
�
'
1
1
1
7['�+�� ����
' a1r ' ' „� � ,i `+t.
� � :
, :�• ...
..
'� : ,�k �
�, �.
�.. �
�har°ke�r �oa� �x�i?�a�� impr��er�aee�� �roj�ct
�rza€� �3arker
Gi�y c�fi �learv�rater
,�ilagafi�r� �reek
Can?�i�s��� (!C!�) 1Q f�robierr� Priarat� 3.06
GI� - �'st�, �esign
�tr�a�t�are Floodirsg, �ridge Flc�odin�
Description: `I'he Sharkey Road Drainag�
Inzprovement Project will consist of the
replacement of the undersized culvert crossing at
the coiner of Sharkey Road aud Oberlin Drive
and the reconstruction of tlie chaiulel to the i�orth
of tlze ct�lvei�t. This project is recommended in.
the Alligator Creelc Watershed Manageznent Plan
(June 1997). Wlule this project will reduce the
frequency of floodi;ng, imp3ementation of�
dovv��sheam iinprovem�ei�ts wilt �till '�e requirea
t�o meet drainage Jeve1 of sezti�ice irz C;ollege �Iila
az�d Rolling Heigl�ts.
�bj�cfibv�s:
I. To alleviate the �Ioodine oi l2�uses
along Oberlin Drive.
2. To cliininate tl�ie c7vertoppi��g of
Sharkey I'�oad due to the :�:istin�
understzed cul���rts,
�
�
Fl� 2001: The Sharkey Road Drainage
improvement Project is currently under design.
The next step is Coinmissioia approval to fund
�1'O��Ci C0115h11Ct1017_.
F��C�L S199�!°�,A��
�r�ject G�s�
Piamiing
Design Enginee�ring/Persnits
Land Acquisition �
Conshllciion �900.000
" * . �. '
����i�a� �r�r� ��h�r�
J€'S'i&�°i'Ci
�T�isec��a°ed
�'�ata1, Othe� �'�u�diezg
���� �h��°E�
Storn.water Utility
► � � , !.
,
r•�; �,
$0
�°� 0�%�
��oo.000
�'c�ircF. �'ity �'ccnding �900,000
if�TAL PR0,9�C�` �S.1nfD!/�i� �900.000
��C�l�99"iB��B�$�
Total Project Cost
Expended Tlu-ough 09/30/04
Needed to Coinplete
�900,000
$ 0
900 000
'
'
�
0
u
�
1
1
1
1
�
C��
��
1
�
��
0
1
����°��� I����i D�°�.���.�� ���������nt�
, �z
�� ,
c. . �� � � f:: ,.
�� ;�. ��.
,
�_ .� _
, �, ,
f ° a� ; .�. _ _
�lii�ator �r��k �rainage im¢aravernen±�
3�rry �ir�c4�
�ity o� �fear�nrater
Allig�tor �reek
�ommissi9r� (Kk0) 9,4 �'riority 1.20, 1.22�1,26, �.05
�iP — �ity, �roject Developrner�t
S�ructure Floading
�escription: The next phase of
improveinents in Allig;ator Creek following tl�e
inlplementation of the Kapok project includes,
clearing and snaggin.g Chamiel A between
Belcher Road and N.E. Coaclmian Road, and
widening the cl�ailnel between N.E. Coachman
Road and, U.S. 19, the installation four parallel
box culverts t�nder U.S. 19, the installation of
larger box culverts at the e.ntrance road Co the
Solid Waste Transfer Station and die
cc�nsnuction oi an off inle ireatmenC pond, 'T'lie
Alligator Creek Watershed Managemeni Flan
includes tlie rep'.ace�ne�nt of t�l�e C}ld �'oaclunan
Road and N.E. Coacl�man Road bridgP spans,
a�ld the widening of Channel A bet�aeeu �r.S, iS
and Cliff Stephens Park which v✓euld require
cooidination and participation by Pinellas
Coullty in orde3- to fi�lly in�piezne�lt
improvezzients in this area.
These impi-oveinerits would assist in resolvuig
flooding problems in the reach of Channel �
from Belcher Road to 1J.S. 19; and in Chaiuisl J
aiad H which are directly related to tailwater
conditions in Cl�aimel A. The problem is defined
oy a set of road crossings that fail to meet the 25-
year flooding level oF service, in addition to
isolated instances of stYUCtural floodii�g durin�
tlae 1.00-year desi�n sto:rn� event.
ObjeCtsves: Redure flc�oding in this reacl�
of Alligator Creek.
12
�
FY 2001: No Activity
F{S��4L Sl1MMARY
Pro�ect Cc��t
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
�� ,: . ..• � ,
��s�dd�g �'r�� ��h���
�eeured
�Jnsseured
2'oiaC Otlaer �'�anriiri�
�atj! �h��'�
Stoimwater Utility
� 663,507
�3.750,437
�� ��4.�4�
� °��
$Q
� oa�l�
�4,424,044
7'otad �`iiy Fe�►2ding $4,424,Q44
��i/-EL f'R�,�E�7° �LIIVDlfVC's �4,424.044
��qi,lli"E'971011�S
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09%30!00
Needed to Complete
$4,424,044
$ 0
_4 424 044
�
�
�
1
1
�
�
�
0
�,�
�J
1
�J
l_J
1
�
1
1
1
l��fl���,���° C�°��� �� �,����� ������ �����s
' 13
,�. �,
� �. . .G�
. ;�, .,•.
,:.
� :��
r -.. ;�, �
�. i�
��evpnsar� Creek 0rrmplementa�i�n P��se [
�Bid�t ShoEaerg
�ity of �lear�rater
Stevenson �reek
�or�rrai�sian (KIJ) 9 Problem Pr�i�ri�y 'l,Q2, 1.08, �,�2
�i� �- J�int, P'rojeet Devalopmen�
Structur� Floociing, Water C�uality/Enviror�ra�enfiaR
Description:
The Stevenson Creek Watershed Management
Plan (WMP) identifies causes and sources of
problenls such as Elooding, water quality
degradation, excessive chamlel exosion, and los�
of habitat. Once problenvs are ideniifiedo
recoi�unendations are made to alleviate tile
problenls. The WMP focused on floodplain
Level of Service (I'I'LOS) deficiencies with
water quality, h�tbitat restoration anci ea-osion
protection il�cor�orated where feasible. Th�
reconunendations in.clude capital iinproveznent
projects, creation and restorarion of l�abitat,
inaintenance and o�erational shategies and
pollution reduction programs. These projects
and programs refleet the goals of il�e City
Compreherlsive Plan.
Full iillplementation of WMF projects wil� z�esuii
in the reinoval of 24� 3 of the ideiztified 334
stnictures fi•om tl�e 100 year flood plain, Many
(28) of the remanung deficiencies are located
witl�in the coastal high hazard area of Lowez�
Stevensoi� Creek and will remain suscentible to
ilooding from storii� surge. In adaitiou the
coinbined �i-ojects would remove FPI_,QS
deficieilcies at 33 locations on residential streets,
16 locations oii collecto�� �oads. aud on �ne�
arterial road.
Objec#6ves:
1. To resalve pz�oblen�.5 identified i�1 the
waterslied management plai� and provid� flood
protectioi., water quality iinprovement,
envir�iunental prote�ction and eniaaizced
maintenance and onerational controls.
14
S�'���5
F'Y 2001: The City approved interlocal
agreeinents with SWFWMD and FDEP in June
and July of 2001. The WMP was cornpleted in
August 200L Tl1e City is proceeding to project
in�plementation with th.e understanding that
details of the specific projects would return to
the Conunission. bef�r� implementatior� begins.
��5��� �UN1M�&��' ��� �Q�2�
Projec� Cesst
Planning
Design �ngineering/Per�nits $ 60G,04C?
Land Acquisition � 700,000
Construction � $4.790,500
� : .;;� �.. -- " �.1 `I t
�uncii�g �r�� �t���� �5alp
Secured
SWFWMI} $ 97�,000
I'D�P -- Water Resour� e C��z-a?1t � 1,500,00
�Jeisee�red
SWFVJ�MD $ 925,000
?'otrrl Otli�f• Fcroidieig $3,395,000
�itj/ Share 45%
Storinwater Utility $2.695,500
�'otal �'ity �"undi�rzg $2,695,500
�O�°R� Pi�OJcCT F&Jde�t�t(VG �f�,q.2Q�Q4t
�:�CIi.EiC@i01e�B�S
Total Froject Cost $ G,0905CJ0
Expei�ded Tln-ough 09/�3�J/OQ $ 155.8 i 8
Needed to Colnplete $5,934,622
'
'
�
�
�
1
�
1
1
1
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
,
'
� �����s�g� ����� �����������.���� ���.�� �
"iS.� ~i
' � �
15
5 `i'
PLWIV n1A6VIE:
PIa�.JEC�' SViAhIAC's�R�
L,EAD �lGE�IC�o
BAS61V:
PRO.I�CT P6�1�R'ITY:
��t�.3.�ECT S�'6A,T[1S:
P��tO.IECI" PUR►I�OSE:
IViorningside - IVdeadows Drainage Improve�-►ents
AI Carrier
Gity of Clearwa�er
Aiigator Creek
Gomrnissior� (KIO) 9 Problem Priority 1.04
C19� - City, Rroject Development
Structure Floocfing, Street Flooding
DesCription: The Morningside/Meadows
Drainage Improveme�nt Project will address
honle and street flooding in these two
subdivisions. Houses of major concern are
located on Flushing f�venue, Glelnnore Court,
Charles Drive and Chinaberry Road, Summerlin
Drive and Moreland Drive. The proposed project
will incltiide the extensioil of the stonnwatez-
collection system, removal and replacement of
the existing stori�lwater syst:em and tl��e r��rading
of swales betweei: hon�.es,
Ob�ectives:
1. Alleviate house and st�eet flooding
16
.�G�'�
�V 2001: No Action
FlSCAL SUMM�4RY
Project Cost
P I am7ing
Design Engineering/Permits
Land 1�cquisition
Consh-uction
� ��,4L PROJECT COSi
Funding ��°s�rr� Other�
Secured
�Tnsecured
7'ota� �'tlier Fundirig
$575.000
��75.000
fl °!�
$0
�i#y Share 100°/m
Storinwater Utility $575.000
7'otal City F'undilig $575,000
TOTAL FUMD/NG BaALANG� �
Ftequirements
Total Project Cost $575,000
Expended Tlu�ough 09/30/00 $ 0
Needed to Coinplete 575 000
'
,
1
1
1
1
�
�
�
1
1
1
1
1
�
1
1
1
'
���°�u�� ����1���������
I7
Y s,:: ;�.' ' ;�. J
.; �. . : ,
� .� ;, -
: �,
� ��
• ,
• ;�
Tropic Hiils Drainage Improvernent�
AI Carrier
City of Clearwater
Coastal Zone #2
Corramission (KIO) 8 F�roblem Priority 1.03
CIP - City, Project �evelopment
Stru�ture Fiooding, Street Flooding
DesCription: The Tropic Hills Drainage
Iinprovements project is located south of Gulf to
Bay Boulevard and to the west of li.S. 19 in the
Tropic Hills residential neighborhood. The
proposed project will i�nclude the exteusion of the
stonnwater collectiori system, reinoval and
replacement of the e,�isting storinwater systen7
and the� design of the outfall under U.S, 19.
�bjectives:
l. Alleviate ho�ise flooding for homes on
the sotitll end of the subdivision.
?. Reduce sh�eet flooding throughou1� ihe
subdivision.
18
5�����
F� 2001: No Action
FISCAL SUMMaARY
Project Cost
Plaiming
I�esi�n Engineeriug/Pex�nuts
Land Acqlusition
Consnuction
T�T,4L P9�QJECi COS�°
Fun�ling frorn �th�rs
Se�ured
�iazsecazred
T'otal Ot/ier �'uviding
$550,000
��
0 °/a
�0
�it f �iTaC(� '� 00%
Stormwater Utility $550,000
�"otal City Furcding $550,000
a-ora� PRO�Eer �unrDrrv� �Q_qQQQ
R�quirements
Total Project Cost $550,000
Expended Tluough 09/30/00 $ 0
Needed to Coinplete $550,000
'
'
1
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
,
'
'
'
� ����� �����
���
� ' .� - �.�
�
f,
� � �'J �
e - g� �
� /
N.T.S. - � i� �'
(
r at
a �
�
� s� �r� �
� �/ �� 4
I
j � . `'. ,'_3 ' a
i'i
I �.
��� ��� a
i :
��
�,� � � , a
_, ,
�� !; I�,�,�'�; �t�,�
,J A � 1
✓WY4cil.�� � ( t. ,�QT� I .`—
�� II��II ��,��
� e,,�ry'li -� �,
� ���� ��; �
� � w R �i
cuR�E � ��_—
�
� �
i�
J� vi
J) W
mi
II S.R.
OUNICQIN � \
r � � `'
��oN sr. �, , �
_ �
r�sE � oir�r i
�
o �
, ^ j
,''� '° �;�7 , i �`��l LF TO
i � °''
`' �i,aaA,.,°��� j zi IA9�Ci.eECT
% ��,. TI LCDC�,TEOP�
� -"'� { �
�
� = BELLEA(�' R�.
�� � � ,
r _ i'��.t.�tz y u.�rco'
' f �I �
� or�
oLUSMUt `�
/��
/�-�'�
,�
l
5ATE77� FId1�OR
MAIN ST. -
_�
��
.,m,.�,a ,�Qy,
�9
• �
�s � •r•;
. �. ,.
�.
a •
• f .,
;. � •
Allen's ;;ree� PVeighborhood Fiood°snc�
,41 Carrier
City of Ciearwater
Allen°s Creek
�ommissior� (NCEO) 8 F'roblem �'riority 1.19
CIP - �ity, 6'roject Development
Structure Flooding, Street �looding
Description: The Allen's Creek
Neighborhood Flooding project is the residential
neighborhood located ziorth of the A11en's Creel<
Rehabilitation Project and to the east of Hercules
Avenue and includes Rebecca Drive, Sandra
Drive, Lees Court, Bunvice Drive and Canterbury
Road. This project is i�itended to redtzce house,
sh�eet and yard flooding due to inadequate
stormwater coirveyance. The proposed project
will include the extension oi t�he stormwat�e���
collection system, removal and replacement of tli�
existinb storn�watei- system and the i-egrading of
swales hetween llou�es.
C3bjectives:
1. Alleviate hause ai�d street tlooc�i�i�,
�p
STAT�9S
FY 2001: No Action
FiS�AL Sl1MMARY
Prmject Cost
Planning
Desi�n Enginearing/Permits
Land Acquisition
Ccnstruction
�"C�iAL P6�C}JE�i C���
F�anc6i�g �rom Ofih���
Ses�a�red
�iJnsecu�-eci
�'otal �tlacr F'unding
$60U,000
�600.000
�%
`� 0
���a/ s�a�� 7 00°%
Stozmwater Utility $600.000
�"otczl �':ty� �'uszdieag $60�,000
�'OTAL 9�RC3JECT FUNDIIVG �600.000
Req u i rer�tent�
Total Project Cost $600,000
Expended Tluough 09/30/00 $ 0
Needed to Complete $600,000
'
I_J
�
u
�
�
�
�
�
C'
�
�
�
�
C
u
�
0
�
����� 9 s ��°��� i�e�gl��b��°�h���
�1
S`TR�ET Fi�00Di1`IG
PROJ�Gi"S
Project
North Greenwood Corridor Enhancement Project
Stormpipe System Replacement Projects
North Beach Drainage Improvements
Project
City-Wide Aerial Photography*
* No Description Provided for Projects Less Than $100,000
22
Commission
Priority
14
8
8 -
TOTAL
Commission
Priority
G
Project Cost
$2,315,001
$5,814,000
_ $470,000
��
Project Cost
$22,000
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN: �
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
N. Greenwood Corridor Stormwater Enhancement
Project
Bob Maran
City of Clearwater
Stevenson Creek
Commission (KIO) 14 Problem Priority 2.02
CIP — Joint, Design
Street Flooding
Description: The City of Clearwater will
begin improvements along North Greenwood
Avenue corridor from just south of Palmetto
Street north to Fairmont Street. In conjunction
with this project, the City intends to upgrade the
main collector pipes running under North
Greenwood Avenue and relocate them from
under the planned roundabout. This coizidor
project will be a timely oppoitunity to replace
older pipes from under the proposed
improvements to a more strategic location for
future repair as may be needed.
Objectives:
l. - Improve the City storm system.
2. Protect the new st�eetscape from pipe
collapse below proposed improvements
3. Alleviate street flooding with larger
capacity drain pipes.
23
STATUS
FY 2001: The North Greenwood
Corridor Enhancement project is designed and '
on schedule for construction in November. A
change order in the amount of $225,000 for
stormwater drainage improvements will require
Commission approval.
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Conshuction $2,315,Of�1
TOTAL PROJECT COST �2 15�4,4
Funding from Others (18%)
Secured
SWFWMD $ 425,000
Unsecured
Total Otlzer Furzdiilg $ 425,000
City Share (82%)
Road Millage $ 240,000
Water/Sewer $ 425,000
Penny for Pinellas $1,000,001
Stormwater Utility $ 225,000
Tatal City Fuizding $1,890,001
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING �2 �1 !41
Requirements
Total Project Cost $2,315,001
Less Other City Funding $2,090,001
Expended Through 09/30/00 $ 0
Needed to Complete 22 000
'
�
��
' ,
i
'
�
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
�
�
�
�
�
�
1
1
N��I� ��°��m����� ���°�°����° ���.�c�����s
' 24
P i��.) � C'T 11B/41�i E:
PRO.JECT` 11IIAN�►�EFS:
LEAD /�GEIVCI(:
B�ASIN:
PFt0.9EC1' PiZi�EtIT1(e
PFZO.IL��' �TA,Tl1S:
PROJECT PIJRPOSE:
�iorr� 6�ipe Syst�m Reg�lacement �roj�ct�
Bab Maran
City �f Glearwater
City�wid�
Commission (KIO) 8 Problem Priority 2.00
CIP — City, Project Development
Street Flooding
Description: The Public Services
Department compiles a list of temporary repairs
made throughout tlie; City-wide storm pipe
systein, providing this information to
Engineering. The locations where temporary
repairs were made are evaluated by Engineering
and, where necessary, permanent upgrade and
replacement locations are placed on the annual
stormpipe replaceinenl: couh�act. All projects are
reviewed by the Capital Improveznent
Stormwater Managen�ent Corrnnittee for
consistency with appropriate watershed
management plans and prioritized by the
Committee. Emergeiz�,y projects are given the
llighest priority.
Objectives:
1. Either slip-lii�ie or replace corrugated
metal pipe witl� reinforc�c� concrete
pipe.
2. Eliininate road base erosion and
subsequeut road subsidence.
S. Reduce sediinentation load to storn�
pipes and ultimate receiving watez-body.
25
' ,+�
FY 2001: The City Cornrnission
approved the Annual Stormpipe Replacement
Project for FYOl in March 2001. Tlu-ee of four
contract areas have been completed. Replaced
132 ft. of �4-inch pipe along Druid Road west of
Missouri Avenue. Also replaced 1900 ft. of up
to 18-inch diameter pipe at Glenwood
Avenue/Diuid Road and Po�vderhoni
Drive/Huntiugton Lane. An additional 600 ft. of
18-inch diameter pipe will begin in the �fall at
Pinebrook and Adlniral Woodson L,ane.
������ �������
Project Cost
Plamiing
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Construction
T�TAL PROJEC7° COST
Fua�dir�g �rora� Othe�°s
Secured
lJnsecured
Total Ot/aer Fundirig
�!$y $hat'E
Starmwater Utility
Payments in-Lieu-of Retention
$5.814,000
�5.814,000
oov�
�0
� oo°%
�55730,000
$ 84,000
Total City Funatiiig $5,814,000
T�TAL. AROJEGT FUNDiNG �
Req�airern�nts
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$5,814,000
$ 0
�5 814,000
'
�
�
�
�
�
�
u
�
�
�
�
�
0
u
ll
�
l�'
����°� ���� ������ �����.���e��
' 26
PL.,��1 �A[VQ�:
PRO.)EC`�' MA�VAG�R:
i.EAD AG�I�ICY :
BASI IV:
PFt�JECI' PRIOi�ITY:
PRO.�EC� STATUS:
PRQ.DECT PURPOSE:
�arth �ea�h �rainage Improvemer�ts
Ai �arrier
City of Clearwater
Ciearwater Beach Island
Cornmission (KIO) 8 Problem Priority 2.10
CI� � �ity, 6�esign
Street Flooding
Description: The North Beach Drainge
Improvements Froject will provide
improvements at various Iocations in the north
end of the island. The work will include the
installation of stonn grate inlets and removal and
repair of` the existing collection anci outFall
system.
abjectives:
1. Alleviate street tlooding stanciing wlter
in street.
2, Itepair the existing storin�r�ter
collection system.
3. Repair st�eet ei7d outfalls.
2l
STAT�S
FY 2001: In-house survey has been
completed and project design lias begun.
Estimated construction to commence prior to
Januar.y 2002.
FIS�AL SUMMARY
�rojecf Cc�st
Planning
Design Engineering/Permits
Land Acquisition
Constructioi�
iC�TAL PROJECT COS�
�undi�g frorn Oth���
Secured
iJazsecured
�47Q,000
_ 00
0 �/o
7'otal Otlaer Fu�2ding �C�
Ci�y Share 100°/p
Stormwater Utility $470.00�
Total City Funcdiizg $470,000
T'QTAL PRQJEC7° FUNDING �470,000
f�equirements
`Total Project Cost
Expended Tluough 09/30/00
Needed to Com�lete
���o,000
$ �
�470.000
1
��'
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
�
1
1
1���� ����� ��°����.�e
' 2s
'
'
,
�
�
�
�
1
'
'
1
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
R�C ULATO►I�Y �pNIpL,IANGE
PRO1EGiS
��o�e��
FDEP Conzpliance Project
�roject
NFDES*
* No Description Provided for Projects Less Than $100,000
24
cn�m;ss�o�
�riority
S
;'�'i'AL
CQm�issio�a
�'t��ot-it�,
5
Fro���t cQS�
$1,008,000
6_1 . II
�rojeci �'ost
$44,OOQ
PLAN NAIVIE:
PROJECT MANAC�ER:
LEAD AGENGY:
BASINc �
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STAYUS:
Pf\oYGi.r f Q'4sRPOa7G:
F�EP Compliance
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
Not Specific
Commission (KiOj 5 Problem Priority 3.00
P8�S — City, Pian Concsption
R@gUIBtOP�/ COIII�JIB8f1G�, Water Quality fmprovement
Description: This project provides for the
funding of water quality enhancement projects as
required to satisfy a c;onsent order �vith the
Florida Deparnnent of Environmental Protecr�on.
The Cit_y has currently paid $20,000 to FDEP for
costs and expenses towar�d satisfyin� the consent
order.
Several projects have been considered %r
implementation and submitted to FDEF for
review in 1999. To date, however, FDEP has not
responded to the submi�tal.
While the originai settlezneiat "projeces'° requir�d
the expenditure of $900,000, the actual cost of
zmplementing projects under consideraticn
would be somewhat hiaher; therefore, tatai
funding in ±he amount af $I,C28,00� is being
requested.
O�a�efiiv��:
1. Sarisfy �'D�P C�onsent Order.
2_ �'rovide wat�r quality ��nefi�is �o
Clearwater Harbor and 'Ta�npa Bay.
ST�TUS
FY 2001: No action has been undertaken
this year.
FISC�lL SUfVIIVI�RY
�roj�ct Cost
Planning �
Design Engineering/F'ermits $ 151,200
I�and Acquisition
Construction � $56,800
���"iAL. Fl��,1��'�` �E,���' �1.008,Q00
Fur�c�w�g ��°�r� C�th��°� Q�l�
See�red
�Jnsectsr�d
�"otal (lther I't�rt�irs� $Q
����' ����'� � �Qgia�
Starm��a.ter Utility $ i .008.00�
Tcrrt�l �'at�� Ftsn�frreg $?,008,Q00
T�T�L PRQJ�Ci FL/IV�!l1fG
Requirerner�i�
Total Project Cost $ I,00�,000
Expended Through 04/30/00 � 0
Needed to Complete 1 008 000
'
'
'
'
'
�
'
�
'
_ '
'
'
;I�
'
�'�
,
'
'
30 '
,
'
1
1
1
1
'
.:-:.�,;'''
' �.
,�,�
��
�°i
'�
' .
'
' _
z �
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
���� ����������
� ` .�� ,.�.� . C '�'�-X�".C���� � �"i� �, . .
� ^� .��-'�' "` � '�' � `a� ,�' _ �- } w �»,�„�..�.._
� -. , _ . , � . � . . . '� �����- - g�
31
�i `
� + - � „' ,�" '� �
�m. �, i
_ xi `„� �' � � � �
�� � y �,.m ,�,�;� � � � _
� ����,���
�
� �`��z� ,zd �
��� � � ���n ` r
.
��
,e�;: ��� � � � ��, � ;
�,���.` � � -���� .�,
, �, ��;=
� ;
�f � � � '� ,
� s •
�r�ject
None
�'o�mission
Pr�ori�y
3?
�r�jeci �t�st
iVIAJOR EROSIOItii
PF�OJE��'"S
pro�eCt
Allen's Creek Gabion Project
33
comm�ss�an
Priority
�
'�'OTAL:
����e�� eost
$681,779
,,�: '
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENGY:
BASIN: �
PROJECT PRIORITY�
P�tOJECT STATtJS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Alien's Creek Gabion �roject
AI Carrier
City of Clearwater
Alien's Creek
Commission (Kla) 9 Problem Priority 5.00
CIP — City, Construction
Major Erosion, Bridge Flaoding
Description: The ongoing Allen's Creek
Gabion project is located north of Gulf to Bay
Blvd. and south of Cleveland St. at Rainbow Dr.
This project is necessitated by increased flow
rates in the Allen's C;reek channel caused by
expansion of the stormwater system on
Cleveland St. The project consists of channel
realignment and sidebank stabilization utilizing
the construction of gabion baskets and gabion
mattresses. The project also includes the
replacement of an exi:;ting 72 inch com:gated
metal pipe with a 7 foot by 20 foot ConSpan
bridge structure at Rainbow Dr. Due to the
nature of the project x homes wi11 be removed
from the 100 year floo�iplain.
Objective�:
l. To eliminate� 1;he onaoing erosion that
has caused portions of the creek owned
by the City from encroaching into
pnvate property.
2. To alleviate :roadway avertopping at
Rainbow Br.
34
STATUS
FY 2001: The Commission approved
award of conshuction in May 2001.
Construction is presently underway.
FISCAL SUMMAI�Y
Rroject Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Perniits $ 1�6,550
Land Acquisition
Construction $ 665,229
i�TA� PRf�JEC►' ����" ���
Funding fror� �th�rs 0%
Secured
iJnsecured
Total �ther Fundtng $0
�It� ���t'� '� OQ°�Q
Stormwater Utility $ 681,779
Total City Funding $ 681,779
TOTAL FUNDiN€3 �AL/-iAl�E �_G�1.774
Requirements
Total Project Cost $ 681,7'9
Expended Through 09/30/00 $ 14,950
Needed to Complete 666 829
,
C�',
�
0
1
0
lJ
1
II
1
1
�
�
�
�
�
�_�
1
������ ��°��� ������ ���� ���
� 35
�
'
,
'
'
'
'
�
�
�
'
'
'
�
S
i
1
1
�
♦ � � ` ♦ '
• �
� ;� ,
•; � �.
�Y'(?JeC�
Stevenson �Creek Estuary Restaratfon Project
Alligator Creek Iinplementation Projects �
North Greenwoo�' Siormwater Retrofit Praject
�rojeci
Coopers Point Restoration & 1Vlana�ement Project*
* No Description Provided for Projects Less Than �100,000
36
�OIIlYT11SS10HY
�'r��rity
12
12
7
'�'�i�iL:
��mmission
Pr►ority
ry
N � •- �, . :
$7,000,oC�o
$2,216,Q00
$33Q,779
�4.54b¢774
�roj�et C�s�
$92,OOQ
PLAN HiWNiE:
PROJECT MAh1AGER:
L.EAD AGENCl(:
BASBN: -
PROJECT PRIORIT`1(:
PRAJECT S'�ATUS:
PROJECT PU�POSE:
Stevenson Creek �swuary Restoration
Eiliot Shoberg
United States Army Cor� af Engineers
Stevenson Creek
Commission (KIO} 12 Problem Priority 6.00
P&S — Joint, Scope and Participation Criteria
Water Quality/ Estuary Restoration
Description: The Stevenson Creek Estuary
discharges to Clearwater Harbor at the
intersection of Ft. Harrison Street and Sunset
Point Road. The Esluary Restoration Project
was prompted by response to community
concerns to reclaimed water expansion in the
North Green«�ood cornmunity. Thraugh the
Srownfields Environrsiental Justice plan, Yhe
community requested this project #o have
primary imponance. The dredging will focus on
accumulations of material and restoration of the
estuary . Approximately �0,000 cubic yards of
muck deposits, primazily located betv✓een the
Fort Harrison Avenue Bridge and the Pinellas
Trail Bridge, will be dredged to help improve
water clarity and improve the habitat. 10,000
cubic yards of material will be dzedged to open
up restricted tidal flo��s at the Fort Harrison
Avenue Bridge. Without the project, the
Stevenson Creek designated t?utstanding Flarida
Waters (Chapter 17-3.041, F.A.C.) and Class III
waters would probably continue to degrade in
environrnental quality. Odors from Che area
would cor.tinue ta be baneful and aesthetics
cauid decrease.
•.;• .
2. Reduce odors associated with the organic
muc�, improve area aesthetics, restore
dissolved oxygen levels and help
reestablish the estuary tid�l flow
2. Preserve the natural estuary.
3. Sea grass and mangroves �vil1 be planted
in the Estuary.
4. The USACOE E�nvironme�atal Restoration
Report to demcrostrate Federal Froject
3ustification. Without Federal
Justification, this proje�t is underfuxided
by $4,550,000.
37
STATUS
FY 2001: The USACOE completed the
Preliminary Restoration Plan (PRP) in October
2001. The USACOE is conducting a feasability
study for the Stevenson Creek Estuary
Restaration v�ith an expected completion date of
April 2002. The next step will be to bring a
1'rajec: Cooperative Agreement (PCA) between
the USACOE and the City of Clearwater to the
Commission for approval. The City has applied
for federal funding support to the United States
Congress for $4,SSO,QOQ in I'rY02.
�E$��� �������
�rcaject ��st
Planning $ 552,11 �
�esign Engineering/�ernuts $ 646,208
Land Acquisition $ 1,270,000
Consin�ction $ 4.�31,674
� :. -.� � I1k 111
F�r�e�in� fr�m ��F�ers
Secc�red
Unsecured
USACOE
Total Other Fu�iddng
City Sh�re
Stormwater Utility
Total City Furzding
T�7'.4� PRC3,I�CT ,�4JN�lOV�'i
��C,l.l16'�111@P'i��s
To�al Project Cost
Expended Through Q4/30�QQ
Needed to Complete
_: ,
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
�' 1 %
�S,OQ0,000
$S,OOQ,000
�7.aoo.000
�7,OOQ,000
$ 0
7 000 000
�
C
'
IJ�
�
,
a
�
,
�
��
�
�'
�
i
,
��
�
1
1
�
�
l�
�'�
�
�
�
�
1
�
�
Il
�
u
�
1
�����n��� ����� ��t��.� I��s�o�°�.����
' 38
, � ..
� �. . .; r
.:� �
:,
• �
� .
� •
Aiiigator G�eek 6mplementation Pro�ects
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
All�gator �reek
Commissiar� (KIO) 12 �roblem �'riority 6.04
CIP � J�int, Construction
Water Quality Imprvvement
Description: This project is for the
conshlzction of three projects that were
reconunended for implementation in the
Alligator Creek Watershed Management Plan
that was developed in cooperaiion with the
Southwest Florida Wa�ter Management District,
Pinellas County, Safety Harbor and the City of
Clearwater.
The projects are:
1. Stabilization of Cl�annel B betweei� SR 590
and Moccasin Lake Park using gabions;
2. Moccasin Lake Park Sedimer�t Sump and
Rehvdration which includes the construction
of a pond and in-line sediznent sump to catcll
sediment and h�ash and heat storinwate�°
before it discharges into the park.
3. Cliif Stephens Parlc Dredging and Sediment
Sump which includes dredging of the
westermliost pond in Cliff Stephens Parl<
and the consnlictic�i� of a sediment suiup to
catch sediments before they reach the lake
proper.
The projects ar� cc�operatively funded by
Clearwater, Pinellas County, the Southwest
Florida Water Management Dist�ict, Florida
Deparnneilt of Enviromnental Protection aild the
Tampa Bay Estuary Prc�gram
Objectives: Elinu�uate erosion in Channel
B upst�-eam of Moccasin I,ake Park; catch
sediments for removal before entering the park
and rehydrate the park by restoring flow to
historic chamiels; capture sediment from
upsheam for rei:zoval in an area of Cliff
Stephens Park that is accessible and can be
maintained xegularly.
39
��O�T� �
F'Y 2001: In May 2001 the Commission
approved a second amendment with the
SWFWMD and others for implementation oi the
watershed management plan for Alligator Creek.
Wztershed, providing for a tiine extension to
Jnly 2002 and reallocating funding.
F�SCAL S�3NBMAR�'
Project Cost
Plam�ing
�esign Engineering/Pennits
Land Acquisition
Consh-uction
I � '1. •
Fu�dirag fror� �#he�s
Se�ured
State (SWFWIVID)
Cotulty
Safety Harbo�-
FDEP
TI3EP
�Jusecured
Total Ot/ie�° Fauidirzg
�@�`�/ Sh�t'@
Stormwater Utility
Total City Funding
TOTAL PROJECT FUIVDING
�@Cjl.11C�it'E@II�S
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
$ 456,�00
$ 254,500
$1,SOS,OOQ
��.Zl�.00a
52 °/a
w 596,1�8
� 255,196
� 10,675
� 242,000
� 37.500
1 141 529
�$%
$1,074,471
$1 074,471
'�►�►�[�[IDII�
�2,216,000
$ 662,637
1 553,363
�
'
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
A��������° ��°��k ����e�e��a����
1
1
' �o
6�i�O.IECT BVAME:
PROJECT tVIAHVAGI�R:
�.E�� AG�illcli:
�ASiN:
PROJECT PRIORITIP:
8'6a0.1E�T S1'I4TUS:
PRO.��CT PURPOSE:
North Greenwood Stormwater Retrcfit
Elliot Shoberg
City c�f Clearwater
Stevenson Creek
Commission (KIOj 7 Problem Priority 6.02
CIP — Joint, Construciion
►Nater Quality
Description:
The City of Clearv✓ater is installing two
Continuous Deflection Separation (CDS) units
for treahnent of stormwater runoff that is
currently discharged t�o Stevenson Creek. The
smaller unit will be installed at Pennsylvania
Avenue between Grant and Marshall Streeis and
will not be monitored. The larger of �he two
units will be monitaced far an eight-month
pe�r-iod and wiil be inst�lled at Missouri Avenue
and Pah7letto Street. The monitaring will
izlclude analyzing pollutaut reinoval effi�iency of
fl1e unit and cl�aractez-ization of the material
collected iu the sump.
CDS devices are designed to function as gross
pollutant h�aps to capture debris and other
floatables, coarse sedirment and sediinent-bound
poliutants. Tile CDS technology is designed to
divert low flows through the unit and le� a
portion. of the major r,zinfall events bypass the
unit to avoid flooding problen�. Heavier solids
drop into the contaimnent sump and a perforated
separation panel keeps the floatable items from
leaving the unit. The materials that collect in the
suanp do not have to be removed aftea- each
storm, only when the sump is full.
Objectives: .
1. To monitor tl�ie overall ability of the
CDS unit to reduce the storniwatei
pollutant loadit�g to Stevenson Creek.
2. To evaluate the ability of the CDS unit
to capture floatables and coarse solzds
not typically nneasured, to ei7sure cost-
effective manageinent in future us�
budgeting.
3= To collect rainfall, runoff aiid flow data
from eight (8) statistically signi�cant
storm events within a period of eight (&)
montl�s of sam}�ling.
41
4. Memorial Causeway Bridge water
quality mitigation.
ST�►�f l! $
FY 2001: This project was approved by
the City Corrunission in March 2000 as a design-
build conh-act. The Commission also approved
an amendment to this contract, bringing tl�e total
fiom $258,472 to �330,779, in January 20Q1.
The project is cui-rently under construcrion. The
CDS uiut at the location of Pennsylvania A.ve.
and Graiit St. has been completed.
��sc�� s�n�nn��� ��� 2002}
P'roject Cosi
Planning
Design Engineering/Pernuts
Land Acquisitioz�
Const�-uction $330,779
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Faanding from E)ihers
Secured
SWFWMD
Unsecured
Total Ot/zer I'undirig
City Share
Stormwater Utility
Tota[ City Furiding
TOTAL PRQJECT �UND/NG
��Cf l�fi'�Pl'@�91fS
Total Project Cost
Expended Tlu-ough 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
��
30%
$100,000
$1009000
70%
$230,779
$230,779
�330.779
�330,779
$ 35,829
�294950
'
'
1
'
'
'
'
,
1
1
'
'
'
,
'
,
'
'
,
�T��� ��°����%����1 �����r�.���° 1����°��� 1��oj�c�
�. y
..��� ��� � ��� ��
�i��� �m��aY�S�, wi
� � � � � ..; .,.
� ��;�>
zr �
... . . ,, ,es . . , . ,,;r,..
P
. .. . .. .��.._ :. �`,. . 1. `. ..;.. �.�.. .. .
� �.__ � .. ,����
,+- �
� ,... ��
���� , �
�.,. - T� �� �.:.,:; �
„� - -
f� t ° �
� �. .`. ..,
_ �
, �;: �
� .�<.�_. � ��`�
42
'
'
�J
,
u
'
'
I1
'
�J
'
�,I
'
'
'
C
,
'
'
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT MANAGER:
LEAD AGENCY:
BASIN:
PROJECT PRIORITY:
PROJECT STATUS:
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Storm System Expansion Project
Tom Miiler
City of Clearwater
City-Wide
Commission (KIO) 4 Problem Priority 7.04
P&S — City, Conduct Study
Flood & Water Quality Protection
Description: The City of Clearwater has
completed watershed management plans in those
drainage basins identified by the City
Comprehensive plan for implementation. Each
watershed plan makes recommendation in the
form of project alternatives to resolve flooding,
water qualiry and environmental problems.
Many of those alternatives include the
acquisition of flood prone properties that cannot
be adequately protected by structural
improvements in a manner that is also cost-
effective. In effect, to acquire the property is
more cost-effective than to design and build an
infrastructure improvement project.
Historically, the City has waited to acquire flood
prone lands until the public need and the
availability of funding to address that need are
simultaneously realized. Typically, that would
occur in reaction to a significant flooding event.
The City has not had the benefit of long range
watershed improvement plans to identify flood-
prone lands for acquisition as a cost-effective
solution to overcome flooding problems. As a
result, delays in project implementation,
combined with the public's frustration over
continuous and unabated flooding has led to
more contentious resolve that has included
escalated property acquisitioin costs and on
occasion, added legal costs to the City and to the
public property owner. For example, in 2000,
the City acquired two duplexes on Spencer
Avenue to overcome a series of serious flooding
problems. Settlement costs were $300,000. Had
that property been acquired in advance of the
recurrent flooding event and subsequent
litigation that included attorney fees and
damages, acquisition at the appraised value of
$158,000 may have been a more realistic
settlement cost.
Objectives:
1. Inform property owners of flood potential.
44
2. Create a permanent property acquisition
fund.
3. Acquire flood-prone properties where
benefit cost warrants that purchase.
STATUS
FY 2001: No activity
FISCAL SUMMARY
Project Cost
Planning
Design Engineering/Pernuts
Land Acquisition
Construction
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Funding from Others
Secured
Unsecured
Total Other Funding
City Share
Stormwater Utility
$4,000,000
��
0%
$0
100%
$4,000,000
Total City Funding $4,000,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUND/NG �
Requirements
Total Project Cost
Expended Through 09/30/00
Needed to Complete
,• 111 111
1
', � 111 111
OTH�R
P1�4JEG`TS
Project
Storm System Expansion Project
Infrastructure Management System (GIS)
{No Description Provided} _ _
Project
Citywide Aerial Photography*
Air Conditioner Replacement*
Commission
Priority
4
5
TOTAL:
Commission
Priority
7.02
N/A
* No Description Provided for Projects Less Than $100,000
43
Project Cost
$4,000,000
$464,000
'�� i�i
Project Cost
$22,000
$14,000
'
�
1
1
1
1
�J
0
1
1
IJ
CI'
J
C
0
!�
�
1
'
����°��r���� ��s����-� ����.�����
4�
�
�
'
'
,
:'
,
'
'
'
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
♦ � � �
�
�_
�
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
�i� � � - � % ��' �= ;:�, ��,�'� � � N ��, � � - � fr s ���. ; �t � � �� ��� F�� �
� : �, ::. 1 � ° � '�'T .:` � '
�lt�'
�'oncept Plan
��v�lop �tudy �cope
City Conducts
�tudy
�onsulta�rt
�tudy
����Y�
Concept Plan
Y�evelop Sttady Scope �
�articipation Criteria
Consultant Study
� ' � y�' q 4 - ; ; � � . j " � �. t ' '+.; � ! f i�3 �
',' �/'
�9��'
�roj�ct ��v�lopment
:i
C;ity C'oriducts I'
�esi�ns
�
Gommission 1�
+ ,AW�rc� a��Cc
JO���
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
L_J
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
� � � 1 �
�
�
., .
'
C,
,
'
,
'
�
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
LJ
�trat��ie �b,�e�ti��es/l�easuresi'�'�t°�e�s
Strate zc Priority Kev Intended Outcomes(ILIO
Infrastrueture 1. CIP's need to improve LOS. �
Maintenance & Improvements 2. CIP's directiy leverage private investment.
3. CIP's need to elevate aesthetics and enhance natural beau .
Human Resourees Issues 4. Improve Customer Satisfaction
5. Increase Customer trust confidence in city government
6. Develop employees who have the� skills and commitment to deliver
Auali service to our customers
Economic Development 7. Clearwater will be a regional leader of "industries of the mind"
(fmancial, insurance, real estate of technology driven businesses)
8. Clearwater's downtown wiil be redeveloped into a branded destination
9. Clearwater will be a premier, family coastal vacation destination in Fla.
10. Clearwater will have valued position as a preferred communiry for
families to live.
11. Clearwater will have successful parmerships that result in a well-
educated, well-rounded citize
(�i�ai6ty �i �.ife 12. Clearwaier has a distinctive presence consisient with its natural beaury.
I3. Clearwater offers diverse educationa4, cultura� and recreational
�pportunitiAs.
I ; T4. Clearwater is r�eco nized as a referred lace �o live, warl.c and 1a �_
�ubli� ,�a�ety 15. Ci�arwater is a city free from h�ight. �
15. Clearvaater is proactive in. its proznotion (or support) of communiry well- I
being. I
I] 7. Clear�vater st�ives for overall eifective cominunicatians. I
� 18. Clearwater is a city that values diversity. ,
I 19. Clearwater provid.es efficient and eife^tiv� rn�vement of alI types af
trafirc.
2G. Ctear-,�ater is proact�ive in its pa-omo�ion (or support} of community well- �
being. �
21. Clearwater strives for overali effective cam�n�nications.
22. �learwater is a city that vaiues divArsitv.
23. Cleaxwater provides efficient and effective movement of all types of
traffic. _ _
,
'
'
'
,
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
1
'
'
,
,
� `� � ,
�
50
,
S i VKIbIN\(!i f CK U f ILI I 7
PROJECT LIST
Priority KIO Class WS Location PR�:�LEPJ6 T07A� COST
hJorth Greenwood Corridor Stormwater Ca�rdination repla.;ement with Enhancement
2.92 14 F-2 STC Enhancement Project 5225,000
In conjunction with Tewn Pond, resoAre 17
street LOS deficiencies and remove 18
1.01 13 F-1 CZ1 MyrlbAveDrainagelmprovemenEPro�ect ���ures#rom100vrfbod, $11,104,0�0
Overall water quafity, sedimentationlerosion,
6.00 12 WQ-i STC Stevenson Creak Estuary Restoration and ibod pmtecticn p�nning proiect that will $7.000,000 �
also include dredginn.
6.04 12 WQ-1 NGC AlBgatorCreek Imp�mentation Projects {Ciff Al6gator Geek Watershed Pk�n project wiih $2 2�6,000
Steveds Park, Mocassin Lake, Channel B) SWFWMD and Pinellas County.
1.00 11 F-1 CZ t Town Pond Commercial prope*ty iboding and signifcant $�3,D30,000
water quaEty impmvement project.
Significant in-strucfure f�ding and as a resuft
1.05 11 F-1 AGC Kapok Fbod Resokdion Pmject of previous site devebpment, signifcant $16,688,000
reduction in fbod level of service basin wide.
° Remove 33 strucfuresl 78 dwel6ng units from
1.02 10 F-1 STC GI�n.Oaks �, - �� 100yrfbod $2,203,240
1.06 10 F-1 AGC Shaikey Road drainaga Improvemeni Project Properfy and Siree', Fb�oding, bndge $900,000
overtopping
1.24 10 F-1 AGC Repk�ce Coa,hman Road Bndge span �354,000 �!
_ I
Construct peral�l BC from Gty Fbod Detention �
i.32 10 F-1 AGC FaciEty to N Lagoon Grc� F remove existing £944,006
weir.
Construct paral�l BC on west side Bebher to
1 33 10 F-1 AGG channel A; regrade channel D from Sunnyda� $448,OOQ
to Be�her.
1.04 9 F-1 ALC �mingside Nieadows Drainage impmvements Pro�rtsr �, Street Fboding $575,000
f�lushing( Chinaberryl More�nd/ Summerbn)
1.Q7 9 F-1 STC �Pansion of Lake Bel�we/Upper Lake Remove B structu�sl 17 dweling uni�s from $1,337,884
Bellewe CuNerts 100yr fbod
Spnng Branch Fbod Detention BasiNSpnng Remove 21 str�ctures! 21 dwel&ng units from
1.08 9 F-1 STC Branch Conveyance Enhancements Upper & 100yr fk�od $4,157,360
Lower � °
1.09 9 F-1 STC Jeffords St/Barry Rd �etention Pond Remove 12 structures from 100 yr fbod �1,690,634
1.10 9 F-1 STC St. Thomas DdBellewe BNd Creek Restoration Remove 19 structu!es from 100 yr fbod 51,801,913
1.11 9 F-1 STC �� Lake Expansion & Du�can AvelTumer St Remove 17 structu�es from 100 yr flood $2,376,418
Detention Pond
1.12 9 F-1 STC Palmetto St. Sediment Pump Remove 1 structure from 100yr fbod $544,546
1.13 9 F-1 STC Hilbrest Nve Overfbw Bypass Cuhiert Remove 42 stractures from 100yr flood $2,7_99,109
4-72' RCP improvements under US Nwy 19 at
L20 9 F-1 AGC Al6gafor Creek Fbod Protection $3,080,270
121 9 F-1 AGC W�den Channel A from US Hwy 19 to Ciff This project is Pinellas County junsdiction, but $�
Stephens Park must be addressed in this order.
� 22 9 F � ��� Sofid Waste Transfer Station Entrance CuMert �208,302
Replacement
Widen Chennel A fmm Old Coachman to US '
123 9 F-1 AGC Hwy 19 and construcf bypass chan�el to new Fbod and major emsion protection. $247,63D
ireffiment pond.
125 9 r-1 AGC Wden, deepen ChannelA from N.E. Coechman �427 6�4
to Oid Coachman
' SWUPLKIO-Priority S(�RTFinal.xls gI27/Q11
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
STCJFZIViWATER UTIL�TY
PROJECT LaSi
Priority KIO Cfass WS Location PRO�LEN4 TOTAL COST
126 9 F-1 AGC ��zrl5nag ChannelA Emsion Repair Be�her $102,675
to akl Coachman
1.27 9 F-1 AGC Regrade Channel A from Hercu�s to Sunshine �9E,500
Dnve and repk�e road crossings
128 9 F-1 AGC Channel A, repiace access rnad cuMert $35,Q00
129 9 F-1 AGC Repiace Channel B Office Comp�x access road $21,000
cuNerts
1.30 9 F-1 AGC Replace S. Lagoon Gro� cuNerts in Channel C $92,500
1.31 9 F-1 AGC Replace N. Lagoon G�� cuNerts in Channel C �482,000
1.34 9 F-1 AGC Replace Sunnydale box cuNerts $59,000
1.35 9 F-1 AGC Replace Pnvate Dnve CuNert in Channel F $33,500
1.36 9 F-1 AGC Replace Campbell Rd. CuNerts �38,500
1.37 9 F-1 AGC Reph�ce Beville Road CuNerts $42,200
1.38 9 F-1 AGC berm %r Gameron Apt Compbx pond. In $31,400
1.39 9 F-1 AGC Replace Okl Coachman Road CutJerts $206,700
1.40 ° F-1 AGC Restore Connection between Borrow Pit and $48,300
Moccasin lake
5.00 9 E-1 ALC Af�n's CrAPk Ganion Proj�� ' Major erosion control project. $681,779
5.01 9 E-1 STC B1Ram Pond Dredging � Expansion - Spnng W�er Quafty! Maintenance $831,63G
Branch Stabi6zation Union St to 8yram Pond
�
5.03 9 E-1 A�C Stag Run Bouleverd � Wethenngton Road $1,500,000 �
Tropic Hilis Drainage Impra�ment Project �
1.�3 8 F-1 CZ 2 �gurma) - Properiy Y Street F6nding. �$550,OD0
1.14 8 F-1 STC Flag�r DdCSX RaiUoad North Swa� Remove 3 structures from t00yr fbod $737,2G1
improvemen(s
1.19 B F-1 ALG ���'ns Gecak Neighbnrfux�d F�diny (Rebecc;a, House Floodina. $600,000
E3umice, Sandra.Canierbury)
-'� -� ipe ai res rncd e un war assage, ir
2.00 $ F-2 All Park, Over�a, Linwood, Beaumont, College Hifl $5:814,000
2.01 8 F-2 AGC Pipe faik�re $25,000
2.03 8 F-2 STC Overbrook Ave Detention Pond Street Fk�oding 1 Water Qua§ty $1,755,000
� ;�� � ;.»--> m,.; -,� 1
2.06 8 F-2 STC " Major Street Fk�oding $40Q000
43s:
2.07 8 F-2 STC �� Avenue/Semino� Streets NE Outfall Major storm pipe feik�re imminent and present $814,000
System system is undersized end under homes.
2.09 6 F-2 ALC 415 North Duncan Undersized pipe with major street fboding. � i 26,000
2.10 8 F-2 BCH North Beach Drainage imprnvements Minor Street Fboding $47C,000
2.12 8 F-2 BCH zz8 Do¢hin Point, 286 Windward Passage, 333 $78,000
Island Wa
2.13 8 F-2 AGC Marilyn St., off N.E. Coachman Insufftcient storm sewer system
2.14 8 F-2 STG Frankin Street, Lincoh East to Stevenson Water jumps cur6s with undersized pipes. gZg�,300
Creek & Hil��est wost to Stevenson creek Property fboding.
4.03 8 F-3 CZ 1 1802-1811 Apache Traii $78,000
4.04 8 F-3 CRC 2640 Courtryside & Enterpnse Road (gotf $65,000
caurse
7.05 8 0 CRC Cur�w Creek N1MP 0
1.15 7 F-1 STC ?umer St Box CuNerts Remove 5 structures from 100yr fbod $1,554,761
1.16 7 F-1 STC Woodlawn Terrace Storm Sewer Replacement Remove 4 structures from the 100yr fbod $4d6,783
SVI(UPL6CI0-Priority SORTFinal.xis
9l27/Q12
,
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
J i VI'CIVIVVN I tK U I ILI 1 T
PRC%.lECT LIST
Prlority KIO Class WS .Location ��O�LE�ri TQTAL COST
;, ;7 7 F-1 STC Palmetto St. Dreinage improvements Remove 2 structres ;rom the t00yr fb�od 3735,643
1.18 7 F-1 STC SmalMrood Gr Drainage Improvements Remove 2 strucires from the t00yr fbod $16i,293
204 7 F-Z STC N Missoun AvelPalmetto St Drainage Street Fboding I Water Qua6ty $486,615
Im rovements
2.05 7 F-2 STC Satum Ave �reirege Improvements Sireet Fboding �303,?82
2.08 ? F-2 STC Clearview Lake Street Fboding ! Water Qua6ty $529,000
5.02 7 E-1 STC Upper Stevensons Creef< Stabi6zation Erosion $1,415,843
6.01 7 WQ-1 STC Betty Lane Forested Habitat Preservation Site Water �ua6ty �1,1D0,000
Improve (batab� and sediment 6fler control to
6,02 7 WQ-1 STC Plorth Greenwood Stormwater Retrofit Stevensron Creek; Memorial Cswy. Bndge i330,779
Mitigation.
7.03 7 WQ-1 CZ3 Coopers Point Maintenance a92,00�
3.00 5 G1 STC,AGC FDEP Comp6ance Permit non-comp6ance $1,008,000
7.01 5 F-2 All Infrasiniciure Management Syslem Administration $464,000
7.02 5 F-2 All Gfy-Wide Aenal Photagraphy Administration $22,000
6.03 4 WQ-1 STC Lake Hobart Outfall Control Structu� Water Quafity �14,300
G.05 4 WQ-1 AGC �1°��nel °A°fSo4d Waste "iransfar Slation Offbne water que6ty improvements to Channel $357.553
Treatmenl Pand 'A°
Imperiai Oak C�ndominium - drainage ditcn at Structure tailura causing aesthetic problems at
6.06 4 tNQ- i BSC �ar of property this time. Staff monftonng for ernsian. �900,000
7.00 4 0-1 PSC 2997 Eag� Estates Grc� East Malfunctioning reiention area. � �w26,000
�
7.04 4 G All �#c�tttt� etts�cx�' �and Acquisition 54,000,000
ys�a!? �p . __ _.
r.. , �. _
�
i�� V�bt'i�� ��J6�
--�-- --- IW -- — ------------- -
� F-1 /Stucture Flooding
i P FY01 Stormwater Bond $70,492,906
-----' � --------- ---- ---- - ----�-------- i
� �— j F-2/Sfreet Flooding i
( FY02 Stormwater 8ond � � $11,884,297 I
, e
---- -- -- ----- -- — -__� — —
I � ;� � C-1/Regulatory Gompliance I
� � I `� �Y03 Stormwater Bond i $1,00�,OOQ i
�
:
�_J �����,�_----- ------- --- F-3BridgeFlooding -- — -- I
FY04 Starmwater Bond $'143,000 I
---- ---- _ g - -- — ---- ---- ---- ---
' � E-1/Major Erosion j
r
FY05 Stormwater eond � $4,429,258
—a--- - — --- — � �-- ---
� e WQ-1l Water Quality & Environmental �
Yr R&R Improvemenis � $12,Q10,632
�� � � � 0-1lOther � $4 026 000
,
,
---r-- I —
�— �-------- -------
� Grarrd Tod�l $103,994,093
1
' SWUPLKIO-Priority SORTFinai.xis
9/27/013
♦ � � �
�
54
'
�
'
'
'
�
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Proiect Descriotion
Global Positioning Survey Eq
Air Conditioner Replacements
Stormwater Quality Impr
Habitat Restoratior, & Impr
Storm Drainage R&R
Ailen's Crk Rehab at Hercules
Alligator Crk Implementation
Cooper's Pt Restor & Mgmnt
Storm Pipe System Repiacement
Town Pond
N. Greenwood Stmwtr Retrofit
Allen's Crk Gabion
Stevensons Crk Estuary Rest
NPDES
FDEP Compliance
City Wide Aerial Photography
PW infrastructure Mgmnt Syst
N. Grnwd Corr Enh (Stmpipe}
Allens Crk Neighbrh Flooding
AIligator Creek Drainage imprvmnt
Morningside/Meadows Drainage
Improvements
Kapok Mobile Home Park
Myrtle Avenue Drainage
Improvements
N. Beach Neighborhood Drainage
Sharkey Rd Drainage
Improvements
Storm System Expansion
Stevensons Creek Implementation
Projects
Tropic Hills Drainage
Improvements
Capital improvement� Program
FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06
4,000 4,000
14,000 14,000
9, 000 9, 000
2,000 2,000
5,000 5,000
34,000 34,000
655,000 899,000 1,554,000
32,000 30,000 30,�OQ 92,000
730,000 1,084,400 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,814,000
4,971,000 5,675,000 907,000 100,000 11,653,000
251,000 44,000 295,000
667,000 667,000
1,417,000 1,033,000 2,275,000 2,275,000 7,000,000
44,000 44,000
240,000 768,000 40,OOQ 1,008,000
22,000 22,000
172,000 �1,000 67;000 67,000 67,000 464,000
225,000 225,000
60Q,000 600,000
1,2Q5,000 2,655,000 564,000 4,424,000
575,000 575,000
6,182,000 8,006,000 2,500,Q00 16,688,000
255,000 9,100,�J00 9,355,000
47Q,000 470,000
9Q0,000 900,000
1,OQ0,000 1,000,000 1,00O,OOQ 1,OOQ,000 4,000,000
3,255,OOQ 1,072,000 0 1,108,000 500,000 5,935,000
550,000 550,000
15,375,000 23,299,000 18,566,000 6,269,000 5,830,000 3,064,000 72,403 000
Stormwater Planned Projects.xls/Plnd Pj Revs - NaR '���p
9/27/01 5:38 PM