04/14/2008
WORK SESSION AGENDA
Council Chambers - City Hall
4/14/2008 - 1:30 PM
1. Presentations
1.1 Service Awards
~ Attachments
1.2 Presentation of the City's Annual Financial Report
@ Attachments
1.3 Presentation of GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting - 2006 Annual
Financial Report
~ Attachments
2. Financial Services
2.1 Declare the list of vehicles and equipment surplus to the needs of the City and authorize disposal through
sale at the Tampa Machinery Auction, Tampa, Florida, and authorize the appropriate officals to execute
same. (consent)
~ Attachments
3. Gas System
3.1 Terminate the PGP Gas Supply Agreement and its obligations previously adopted under Resolution 04-34
and adopt Resolution 08-05.
@ Attachments
4. Parks and Recreation
4.1 Accept funding and approve the corresponding agreement from the Juvenile Welfare Board totaling
$116,098 for funding of two middle-school aged summer camp programs and authorize the appropriate
officials to execute same. (consent)
@ Attachments
5. Solid Waste/General Support Services
5.1 Approve a Contract (Blanket Purchase Order) for $3,930,000 to McMullen Oil Company, Inc, of
Clearwater, FL for the purchase of unleaded and diesel fuel for City Motorized equipment as per
Transport award of City of Clearwater RFP 12-05 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same.
(consent)
@ Attachments
6. Engineering
6.1 Award Design Build Contract for the Downtown Boatslips project to Misener Marine Construction, Inc.
in the amount of $10,522,765.05 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same, and authorize
staff to initiate financing of the project, and authorize funding from Central Insurance Fund reserves in the
amount of $2,736,097 to advance the $1.5 million to be paid by the CRA over 3 years and the $1,236,097
of grant funds anticipated once the permitting is complete.
~ Attachments
7. Planning
7.1 Approve the Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment from the Residential Suburban (RS) (City and
County) category to the Residential Low (RL) and Institutional (I) category, Zoning Atlas Amendment
from the A-E Agricultural Estate District (County) and Low Density Residential (LDR) District (City) to
the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Institutional (I) Districts (City) for property located at
3280/3290 McMullen Booth Road (consisting of two parcels of land including Lot 1 Geiger Tract and the
east 308.25 feet of the Northwest 114 of the Northwest 114 of Section 21, Township 28 South, Range 16 East
less the south 208.75 feet and less the west 84 feet and less the east 100 feet thereof for road right-of-way
and Pass Ordinances 7942-08, 7943-08 and 7944-08 on first reading. (ANX2005-02003 and LUZ2005-
02002)
~ Attachments
7.2 Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Suburban (RS) and Initial
Zoning Atlas Designation of Low Density Residential (LDR) District for 2327 Nursery Road (a portion of
Lot 19, Pinellas Groves, Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East); and Pass Ordinances 7937-08,
7938-08 and 7939-08 on first reading. (ANX2008-02002)
~ Attachments
7.3 Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential/Office General (RIO G) and
Initial Zoning Atlas Designation of Office (0) District for 2235 Nursery Road (a portion of Section 19,
Township 29 South, Range 16 East in Metes and Bounds 33/08); and Pass Ordinances 7931-08, 7932-08
and 7933-08 on first reading. (ANX2008-02003)
~ Attachments
7.4 Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Low (RL) and Initial Zoning
Atlas Designation of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1662 Bellrose Drive North
(Lot 56, Bellrose Park, Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East); and Pass Ordinances 7934-08,
7935-08 and 7936-08 on first reading. (ANX2008-02004)
~ Attachments
7.5 Approve Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan related to the Coastal High Hazard Area
provisions of the Coastal Management Element and Pass Ordinance 7917 -08 on first reading.
~ Attachments
7.6 Approve amendments to the Future Land Use Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan related to
the adoption of alternative density and intensity standards for overnight accommodations, and the addition
of an objective and policies pertaining to tourism, and Pass Ordinance 7924-08 on first reading.
~ Attachments
7.7 Approve the Petition for Future Land Use Plan Amendment from County Residential Urban (RU) to City
Residential/Office General (RIO G) and Zoning Atlas Amendment from the County R-3, Single-Family
Residential District, to the City Office (0) District for 2723 S.R. 580 (Lot 5 Block 1 Acker's Subdivision
in Section 28, Township 28 South, Range 16 East); By Ordinance 7941-08, Resind Ordinances 7405-05
and 7406-05 and Pass Ordinances 7922-08 and 7923-08 on first reading. (LUZ2004-11 007)
~ Attachments
7.8 Approve a Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the Residential Urban (RU) and Institutional (I)
Classifications to the Residential Medium (RM) Classification and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from the
Institutional (I) District to the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District for property located at 802,
826, and 830 Woodlawn Street and an unaddressed parcel designated as 22/29/15/00000/320/0200
(consisting of a portion of property located in metes and bounds 32/02, 32/03 and 32/07, in Section 22,
Township 29 South, Range 15 East); and Pass Ordinances 7945-08 and 7946-08 on first reading.
(LUZ2006-08006)
~ Attachments
7.9 Approve a Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the Industrial Limited (IL) Classification to the
Commercial General (CG) Classification and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from the Industrial, Research
and Technology (IRT) District to the Commercial (C) District for property located at 1500, 1510, 1520,
1530, 1540, 1550, 1560, 1570, 1580, 1590, 1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth Road (Lot 1, South
Oaks Fashion Square, Section 09, Township 29 South, Range 16 East); and Pass Ordinances 7920-08 and
7921-08 on first reading. (LUZ2007-07005)
~ Attachments
7.10 Approve amendments to the Community Development Code to adopt alternative densities and intensities
for overnight accommodations, to improve the criteria by which overnight accommodations are permitted,
to adopt criteria for indoor recreation/entertainment uses where none previously existed, to further the
consistency between the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and to
make other minor editorial changes, and Pass Ordinance 7926-08 on first reading.
~ Attachments
7.11 Approve amendments to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design
Guidelines that establish the Hotel Density Reserve and associated criteria for allocation, and Pass
Ordinance 7925-08 on first reading.
@ Attachments
7.12 Approve amendment to the Community Development Code to further the consistency between the
Community Development Code and the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and to make other minor
editorial changes, and Pass Ordinance 7949-08 on first reading.
@ Attachments
8. Official Records and Legislative Services
8.1 Appoint councilmembers as representatives on Regional and Miscellaneous Boards.
~ Attachments
9. Legal
9.1 Adopt Ordinance No. 7927-08 on second reading, amending Section 33.059(3), Code of Ordinances,
relating to waterways and vessels at City owned public docs.
~ Attachments
9.2 Adopt Ordinance No. 7947-08 on second reading, amending Ordinance No. 7372-05, which vacated a
portion of the easterly one-half of the 70-foot right-of-way of Gulfview Boulevard (AKA South Gulfview
Boulevard), subject to special conditions; amending the conditions by extending the date for vertical
constrnction to March 31, 2010 and requiring demolition and removal of existing strnctures on the project
site by October 31,2008.
~ Attachments
9.3 Adopt Ordinance No. 7948-08 on second reading, amending Ordinance No. 7371-05, as amended by
Ordinance No. 7598-06, which vacated a portion of the 60-foot right-of-way of First Avenue (AKA First
Street per field) subject to special conditions; amending the conditions by extending the date for vertical
constrnction to March 31, 2010 and requiring demolition and removal of existing strnctures on the project
site by October 31,2008.
~ Attachments
9.4 Continue Second reading of Ordinance 7949-08 to May 1,2008.
~ Attachments
9.5 Authorize instituting a civil action on behalf of the City against Florida Power Corporation, and Florida
Power Corporation d/b/a Progress Energy Florida, Inc., to seek to recover costs and expenses incurred
during the constrnction of improvements on Myrtle Avenue. (consent)
~ Attachments
10. City Manager Verbal Reports
10.1 Crest Lake Park
~ Attachments
11. Council Discussion Items
11.1 Marine Advisory Board
@ Attachments
11.2 Work Net Pinellas' Summer Career Institute - Counci1member Cretekos
~ Attachments
12. Other Council Action
12.1 Other Council Action
@ Attachments
13. Adjourn
14. Presentationes) for Council Meeting
14.1 Civitan Awareness Proclamation - Frank Kelly
@ Attachments
14.2 Clearwater Housing Authority Update - Robert Aude, Chairperson
@ Attachments
14.3 Distinguished Budget Presentation
~ Attachments
14.4 Proclamation: April19 is Clearwater Poetry Day.
@ Attachments
14.5 Salvation Army Non-Profit Presentation - Major Hinson
~ Attachments
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Service Awards
SUMMARY:
5 Years of Service
Joshua R. Baxter
Felicia K. Leonard
Sharon E. McAuley
Kelly T. Hollinger
Eddie L. Marry
Michael R. Olsa
10 Years of Service
Elizabeth T. Linstruth
Earl J. Uchiyama
Lynn E. Donagan
15 Years of Service
James K. Charon
Ramon J. Cosme
Ethridge J. Hall
Joyce M. Kirchoffer
20 Years of Service
Larry k. Roberts
Deborah S. Lutz
William J. Phillips
William J. New
Charles E. Porthouse
25 Years of Service
Richard A. Niemiller
Glen L. Bahnick, Jr.
Kevin E. Tucker
35 Years of Service
Jennie A. Keegan
Solid Waste
Parks & Recreation
Police
Finance
Solid Waste
Public Utilities
Library
Economic Dev & Housing
Police
Public Utilities
Police
Police
Library
Public Services
Marine
Dev. & Neighborhood Svcs.
Public Utilities
Parks & Recreation
Public Utilities
Engineering
Dev. & Neighborhood Svcs.
Finance
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 1
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Presentation of the City's Annual Financial Report
SUMMARY:
The City's External Auditors, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P., will present the results of the audit of the City's 2007 Annual
Financial Report to the Council.
Type:
Current Year Budget?:
Other
None
Budget Adjustment:
None
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:
Not to Exceed:
For Fiscal Year:
Annual Operating Cost:
Total Cost:
to
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 2
cu
-0
'C
o
LL
1-- U
2 0)
cu ..c
~ ~
cu 0
0) en
- I-
U 0)
'+- ..0
o E
>. 0)
u~
'0
C
:J
o
U
>.
~
en-
I-
0)
..0
E
0)
E
'0
C
:J
o
U
O->'c 0)
('I) cu . Q ..0
I-IDco.....
0) c..... 0
..oO)cc
E 0)0)-0
0) en -
..... en 0) :J
Q.. -0 I- 0
0) I- Q....c
U) cu en en
-0 .-
-oc..c-o
O)cu.....c
-o.....ccu
en .-
c .....
O)O)cc
C :> 0)
I-:.;::::;6E
cu .-
O)-o..cO)
>.:J en 0)
0) cu c cu
o c
..c >..- cu
::..ocoE
o-oE'+-
'+- 0) I- 0
cu .= 0
-o:J'+-O)
._ .......c en
I- '-' - :J
o ~ 0)
LL ..cO)
en.....:5
1-- <( ..c I-
0) ~ 0
co .3:'+-
:c:::co:J-o
c::: 0 0)
cuoo-o
O)N >'c
U _0)0)
-.;tc.....
N.- C
'+- -0 .-
o .- en
>. -5 0> .-
~ I- I- C
ucuQ..o
O)~~~
..c-ocuE
..... 0) I-
'+-.....0)0
OCU:>'+-
-0 > C
en .-
C 6 cu- ..c en
0) 0) .g CJ ~
EIDO)~o
2..cE 2-
cu.....<(......:J
..... t .- Q..
en oo-g I-
cuQ..encuo
'0 ~ 0) I- C
C I- co :J .Q
cu:J.....Oco
~oU)oE
-0-0 I-
0) 0) 0)t5.E
:5:J~:JC
en c -0 .-
-0 .en :J c I-
0) - 0)
~0)0)8..c
-0 > ..c 0) .....0
:Jcu.....
cu ..c c :5 >.
._ c
O)-O.....ocu
>c'-'.....
cucu20)o
..c I'- Q.. > '+-
0)00):';::::;-0
s08cuO)
NCU~~
I-
cu
0)
o
a..
-.J
-.J
o
z
<(
.....J
.....J
o
I
06
I-
0:::
w
;2nw
(Q
~-
0:::
w
I
U
III
-
c
Qj
E
E
o
u
c
o
...
III
.!:!
c
:::l
E
E
o
u
Cll-o
-C
C :J
Q),+-
E "-
C 0
Q;'m .
> E C
o .Q
0> -
..eCll
Q) U E
..eCll"-
-Q).f!
C _C
O~:;
-o:.;::;C
Q)'- :J
III .=:: '+-
III - 0>
Q) U C
"- Cll._
0.. C
>< Q)'-
Q) 0.. Cll
>-E
III .... Q)
C III "-
o III Q)
.- Q) -
.!: C Cll
0..'- 0>
o III Q)
:J "-
-0 ..c 0>
Q) 0>
l;::: lIl- Cll
=Q)Q)
Cll:.;::;..e
:J -::;: -
0":.;::; -0
C U C
:JCllCll
M
M
....
c:i:
r:n
2:
o
"C
C
III
UJ
<C
<C
C)
...
Qj
"C
C
::::I
>-
:!::
.c
III
C
o
Co
III
Qj
0::
...
o
:!::
"C
:::l
<C
-o--'+- C >- . Q) Q)=Cij >-
C O.~ 0.- = ~ -0 III Cll ._ ..c
Cll C U -0 ~'C 'S;: :J '+- Q;
_ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 Cll O_-oQ)
c:JwQ)-cE"-u Cll
Cll ..c .!: ~ ~ Q) 0.. Q) C E u
Q. _ '+- III 0><( ..c .Q 2
Q) ~Q) o-o(ii_Q)
o :c.~ Cll 5. III '+- - C C Cll -0
- Cll III ~ 0 Cll .- ..e Q)
III C ~ "- ~.9- -0 Q) E - ..c
o Q)"-UlIlQ)UCll
III -'m C Q) C C >< ~ -
CJ) ~ Q) ~ '+- 'C (ii 0> ~ Q) .!Q g
<( "-:5 c:: Q) 0.. - 'iij :J -0 "-
<( Cll"- CJ)Q)lIlQ) -0
C) .!: _ ~ Cll g> -0 III = Cll C
$CllO-o:.;::;-o Cll$ Cll
"-..c..e CCQ)lIlQ)Q) III
Q) 0 - '+- Cll :J:'!::: .- - -0 III ._
-0 0 _ 0 C :J .- ><
cOQ) cU:J_oCll Q)
:J-uZ'Q)~ 'OlIlE~>-
- ~ .- E Q):J ..c "- Q) Cll
:E''O,,-OQ)..e..eCllCllO..eE
:J:J (ii:'!:::- -'t:-
..cClllll'+-_:> OQ) III
III lIlOlll> CCo.. -
C "- Cll III .!: Cll _ lIl- C
o:J lIl'E- Q) Q) - C Q)
0..0 - U -ooE
III Q)- C C -0 Q) ..c C .- Q)
Q)E_Q)CijCllQ)lIlCll u-
"- "- ~ E'c "E c..:J 5:Q Cll $
OOQ)Q)OQ)Clllll-ollllll
"-'t:lIl--UUU ClIl
:J Q)..c Cll Cll U U Q) Cll Q) Cll'- III
o o..Clllii E Cll Cllm ~ 5~ E:J
M
_lIl Q)-
Z'.!Q
00.
"-
Q) Q)
~c
Q)
'+-
o "-
..e.Q,
U Cll
~ ~
C 5 .
oc~
-0 C
~-g2
lIlCllc-
~ Cll
~ Cij'o
Q)c-5
Q).-
lIlE'+-
5c-g
'c Q; Cll
.- > Q)
o..Ou
o O>.~
-g"-Q)
l;::: .Q, III
=Cll-
CllECll
:J I E
O"CQ)
co-
:J c.!:
'0 -g -g c--g
lIlCllCll$:J
- c'+-
CCij Q)_
Q)E-Q)ECll
C U :J
Q) Q) .- ~ -0
- E C: 0..'S;:
Cll Q) 0..'-
liiElIl:J-g
Q) lIl._
Cll> -0
'0 g, Cij III C
~,,-ECllCll
coQ) 0>
l;::: 'm C -0 C
E'- Q)'-
~ I c,!:
-c _Q)..c
-0 OQ) lIlE
2 C .~ ~ 8
'OlIle-o.. 2
:J~Q) ~~
CllOc~-E
~ Q) 5'!: 2
Q) '+- Cll
c..e,,- c_
0-0 .Q III
:E '0 'm C-(ii Cij
-0 E .~ E '0
~..eIU"-C
w U C :J 0 Cll
E:~g;g~~
III
-
r:::
CLl
E
E
o
u
r:::
o
:;::;
III
.!:!
r:::
::::J
E
E
o
u
C
o
"0
0)
00
CIl
.0
C
Ol
'00
0)
"0
-t561
CIl C
e'6
o.C
o.CIl
CIl~
- 0)
.- "0
-g C
CIl ::J
0)
- '-
C ::J
.~ t)
~E
0) 00
"0 0
c.l:;
CIl 25
0) t)
>-
:.;:::::; ~
t) '-
~2
w .!:
M
M
.....
.d:
OJ
2:
o
"'C
r:::
III
(/)
~
C)
'+- ~ '+- +-' -
o 0) 0 0 CIl
>-"E 0) C '(3
:t:Ooo"OC
()COC~
"0 .- 2- CIl (j::
~~::J2'-
0) .- 0. C 0)
"Ot: 0)>
'00 8. ~ E 0
cO)-O)"O
o~~ro~
t)-0_"E
0) .~ ..... 00 0
s~OO(iit)
_- CIl ~ '(3 -
.- C ::J C CIl
-g<+="OCIlE
CIl(j)~~2
::; > e O)'!:
o 0 o...c 0)
"0 -..c
~.l:; OlC-
.- C.!: 0 C
Eo:t:co
ot)"ooO)
't: (ii ~ 'c t)
~ E '- '15.. ~
0) ::J 0 '-
o"O"E 0 '-1)l
... C .- ::J 00
1: CIl _00 ~ 0 CIl
o OlC (j) '-E Ol 0)
U ._ _ C"O 0,
- C CIl (j)'OO.- C
III C ~ _ 00 5 .-
ECIlCllO)O),-t:
$ c.. 0) "0 C. 0. 8.
-=EO.8~.8~
...
CLl
"'C
r:::
::::J"'C
;>,CLl
_ ::::J
= r:::
:.0:;::;
._ r:::
III 0
r::: 0
o
a.
III
~
C
Ol
'00
0)
"0
..c
t)
CIl 0,
e C
8::'6
CIl ~
-
~ ~
::J 0)
CIl-g
0) ::J
t) 0)
C '-
CIl ::J
=-=1:5
o.::J
E.l:;
o 00
t)"O
- '-
aic
._ 0
t) t)
tE-
0) ~
'-
"0 0)
c-
CIl.!:
0) C
> 0
:';:::::;"0
t) 0)
~ 00
wE
..cCOlC(j)
:t: O.!: 0 >
st):t:co
"0
0) ~ ::J .2 "0
~ a; CIl .!:.l:; .
CIl_ '- o.cC""l
=CIl::JOOC""l
o.'c 0 t) ..-
EO)O)::;-.d:
orocOCll
t) E'- C '-
E Ol'-..s!l
'- '- C 0) ::J
0) "0 0) .- "E t)
> C _ 00._ '-
o~~~cG
"Ot)Oc.om
.l:;~-xt:<::::
C.- '- 0) 0":::
0"00)..... 0.0
t)CIl"OOO)..c
(ii0)00)'-:t:
c>coo"Os
'- CIl._ 0 C 0)
2..cE2-CIlt)
C32C1l::Jooc
::J'-o.O)CIl
"OOOl -"E
~ t) e 0) 0 0
O)ro o.~- 8
"O..c- "O~
'00 - CIl '- C w
Coo(j).ECIlc
8 "E ~ 00 0) '0)
O).....~~~
5l E '- ::J CIl CIl
_ 0) 0 "0 .- .-
CIl .:: '(if 0) c.. c..
O)5-EgEE
s~CIlc.88
11)
-
l::
Qj
E
E
o
u
c:
o
:;::;
l'Cl
U
c:
::::l
E
E
o
u
-0
0)
o
C
0)
o
C
CIl
0..
E
o
o
C
o
C
(ii
.>::
0)
ro
E
o
z
M
M
....
<i:
a:l
2:
o
"C
c:
l'Cl
en
~
C)
lo..
a>
"C
c:
::::l"C
>-a>
:!::::::l
=c:
:e:;::;
C/) c:
c: 0
o u
c..
C/)
~
~ - c w-1:5 -+-'
o .~ '(ii +" 0) <v g
~2t~tt::iVen
OCllO)'-0)5C1l
'- E 0 Ol(ii 0 5
0) :5 .>:: I en
..c:: S-oO) C
+"->cro .0
~ 0 0) CIl E 1!l '00
5 g -0 3 .~
+"O)CIlenco,-
6~=t5C1lEo..
..0 E~t5C1l3l
CIl 01::0)+"0
0) 0) 0 0 .= C ..c::
o m 0 -0 0) +"
C 1!l CIlE..c::
CIl.- 0) +"
:s en - - 0) ro .~
en +" 0 en > +"
enCenCCIlenO)
CIlO)1il2..c::(iig
0) E 0) CIl :Q .- CIl
:o2+""S::Jg'3.
CIl2-o0l0CllE
cenO)O)Oc
5l E'-{3""'8
~(ii.2 _:.c'o c:t:!
'-'t5<v~5 o-g
Olco..CIl..c::6cCIl
ern -~:.+:::iQl....
'c .~ ~ 5 CIl 'c ::J
'(ii - > _ 0) .~ '0.. 0
a>:Q +,,-ooEo'O
U 0 en C C 0) C 0)
c: -'- 0) CIl +" CIl >
l'Cl'02 E ~'3.~ Ol:;::;
=+"CIlO)OE cO
c.. '- ;:> ro .- 0) .- 0)
E ~ C +" .~ 8 ..c:: :g B
CIlen>c+,,>o
o en~'~ e 0 C e C
U<coEo..coo..CIl
~
0)
-0
0)
LL
'-
o
'(ii'
E
o
-
0)
o
c
CIl
0..
E
o
o
c
o
c en
o E
'c ~
. 0.. Ol
o 0
-00..
.~ 0)
- +"
= CIl
~U5
0"-0
C C
:J CIl
CIl a a ~ 0 :5 .~ _en
c c - .~ en ~
o ~ 0) .~ en 2l 0
-0..0- E 0)
-0 >>"'" 0.. CIl 0 ~ C
~+"o E OJ~..o 0
.- 0) 0 0 .- CIl c
E..c:: 0'-0..60
CIl +" u:i 0.. E en :;::;
X..c:: .C')-OCllCll
0) ~ :J C') ~ 0 0) .~
0)5 "';"O)en'-E
5 0) <c -g ->> CIl 0)
- Q) ..c '+- +-' Cf) +-'
C')O+",- (0)0)
C')~ ~o -0-0
~ :.= C :J .~ C "S;: -
<c 0..'- ~ CIlE 0 0 ~
E'- 0.. 0)
mo-oO C -
-:::; 0 0) ~ .Q ~ CIl .
~ ..o~ c-o en
~ Cf) "C co '+- "0.. :J Q) +-'
o ->> Vl ~ 0 0 CIl :g ~
~O)O..c:: '->E
mO OC::Jo
"'" -o~CIlCllOo..~
~ +-' Q) .-
o 61!lQ) 0 ~~o 6-
..c:: ..0 C Ol +" .- ..c:: C 0)
~CIlO)-gO)~Sen'-
50)Em:o~ 0)3l
O)O~ CIlo..uioo
o C .- -0 0 X +,,-0 ..c::
cO)::Jc=O)c~+"
CIl:ggCll8::_0) -:5
~ > '- CIl 0 E C .-
o 0) 1:: +" 0) ~ .Q 5
8 - 0) 0) C en 'S .~ 0)
CIl .~ 0 E 0) 0 0" 0.. 0
.~ Xl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_..0 0.. CIl 0.. 0.. 0) ::J 0..
o+"Eco.. enoE
en en 0 CIl ::J 0) 0 '- 0
<(2o~(/):5:5.2o
III
-
c
Qj
E
E
o
u
c
o
...
III
.!:!
c
:::l
E
E
o
u
"C
Qj
:::l
C
...
C
o
U
I
UJ
<C
<C
C)
...
Qj
"C
C
:::l
>-
:!::
:.c
III
c
o
Co
III
Qj
0::
...- ~
Qj .-
_ C
III :::l
~ E
III E
Qj 0
00
- ...
o Qj
~eo
O~
Qj~
~O
o Qj
-..c:
-
-
~~
0. C .
~ :::l <(
"'cO::
..c:QjO
:!:::::C'-'
$0>
c.u
-Ec
c 0 Q)
Q)uO)
-g <c
Q)en-
c.:t= c
Q) Q)
-o-oE
ccc.
.- III 0
Q) Q3
ro{l~
.C "'C
Q)OQ)
Si:i:O::
Qj
U
C
Qj
"C
C
Qj
Co
Qj
"C
C
--0
o C
Q) III
-0
o en
Oc
en.2
<ceo
Q..Q:)
0'"
_0.
<CQ3
-
Q) c .
..c:'- Q)
_ u
-enC
0_ Q)
.- -0
O-oa3
"-Cc.
Q) III Q)
- -0
:::l - C
0:: 15 .-
~~.8
.~ 5 ~
... 0 eo
III -
.- Q)
:': _ lo...
E~:t=
~oen
.- III
~ ~ en
lllQ)O)
-c
Q) 0 .-
Sa:2
~~eo-5
+-' +-' .c .-
o-..c:
C C ... $
.- Q) III ...
en ". Q) 0
Q) > >-
O)c-Q)~en
c o..c: 0 :::l
~E+-'~C/)
U:gg'llla3
... lll'C ~ ~
oE~~O
en - u
.~ ~ ~ c 0
,g~or5Q)
8..>Q)~ g
Q)..c: c III
O)..c: - 0)-0
.!: -;~'OO '5
cc >0)
:::l 'C 0 C Q)
o :::l C ~.=::
8 -0.- 0 eo
lll~~ro'E
$ III ... :::l 0
Q)E2~~
C en a3 C ~
Q) :::l _
o 'u en - 0
c"65ffi~
Q) 0.'- U U
l.... t5Lj:~
Q) - lll'-
$ ffien a,lll
Q) .~ ffi '00 .!!1
Ci3 ~ ~ ~ ~
..c:0)0Q)~
I- '00 C $ ~
III
Qj
:!;!
"0
Il.
Cl
C
...
C
:::l
o
U
u
<c
-
C
III
U
~
C
.21
UJ
.!: {l en-.!: III
enoC en
Q) ..c: .2 ~.-
0) Q:) 15 'u Q)
ffiE~"6Q3
-5 Q) C c.~
..c:lll
"'C+""..t::;C'>"cw
C N .!:.~:::l
lll......roc..c:en
-0 _:::l:::l$c
C en 0 Q)
cO:::luoen
0:;::;cu_5
:;::;r5:::l111enu
C,) .- +-' +-' co l....
~"'C..ccQ)o
Q)c.llllll...
enlll.g.glll~
ro .:: 'c 'c 0) C
:;::;Q)O)O)clll
'c ~ '00 '00 'c,:'2
.- l.... l.... ~
Q)O...'OQ) 0)
~en.E EQ)
.-. Q) +"" 1:5 Q) .;:::
0;g5~o]i
Q) 0 0 Q) 'C
eoc.u roO
u 0) u Q).- ..c:
.- c co ;; ~ ~
5:;::;0.--..~1ll
E C-C""l 0-
E ~-o"""~ 0
UQ)-oc~
8~~ffi8~
C/)
-
c:
G>
E
E
o
u
c:
o
:;::;
l'l:l
U
c:
::::l
E
E
o
u
C)
c:
:;::;
c:
::::l
o
U
u
<(
"C
c:
l'l:l
C/)
-
c:
G>
E
G>
C)
"C
::::l
...,
-
c:
G> C/)
E G>
G>-
C)l'l:l
l'l:l E
l;:;::;
2:~
Ol
C
.~
o
o
LL
2
c
Q)
E
Q)
2
en
ro
'u
c
ro
c
;;:::
Q)
:5
c
en
Q)
co
E
:;::::;
en
Q)
c
ro
1:
Q) Q)
u-o
ro
~ E
ro Q)
Eco
.8~
-0 en
~~
'S .~
0-'-
Q) Q)
'-co
.~ E
.... Q)
C..c
Q)....
E en
Q) Q)
0l,Q
ro '-
C u
ro en
~~
....
C
Q)
E
Q)
Ol
ro
C
ro
E
~
en
.>::
-0
~
::l
en
C
~
Q)
en
en
::l~
o en
.~ .~
> ro
~u
en Q)
.~ ~
~~
0:::
-0 0
'co -0
0..Q)
c....
=: .~
~(j)
>,Q)
.... ~
..c ::l
ro 0- .
:::i ~ 5
"'Coo:'+::;
Q) E .~
COroU
E,-Q)
Olo..
:.+::i 0 Q)
LG 0.. 0
. .
>'Q)Q)en
..a:6:5~
""C (j) lo.... C
Q)co~
U'JQ)'+-..c
::l en .~ ~
~.?-~5l
~ Jij ..c ~
o :::J Q) lo....
'-U..c
o..:e .... ~
mOO+-,+-,
..c 0.. ::l
.... 00l
..c c
~ g> co :.c
0:';:;-0 Co
..c.!llcOl
ro ::l ro Q)
E E en '-
o 0 Q) ~
If- If- 10 0 .
.~ c E '(jj :(l
.- .- :::J +-'
::Q u>(3CO
::l.... Q) c E
OC Q:.+:::i
..cQ)OlUen
en E c Q)
Q):.+::iY" Q)
lo....O)Clo....(j)
,g~~,g.,g
-Orou-O....
~Eg~o
~
..c
ro
c
o
en
ro
~
Q)
..c
.8
-0
C
::l
.2
-0
C
ro
en
::l
>,
..c
-0
Q)
5:
Q)
'S;:
~
~
Q)
5:
en
Q)
co
E
:;::::;
en
Q)
Q)
en
Q)
..c
I-
Q)
:5
c
'-
o
.?-
ro
::l
-0
:~
-0 en
c en
Q)
Qj u
E~
Q)0l
....- c
c:e
Q) 0
Eo..
0lQ)
-0 '-
.~ ro
l.... .u
::l C
o ro
c .~
.- -
-0- _en
::i~
80
.... Q)
ro..c
..c ....
.... c
~~
>,u
..c~
~Q)
~c
o..ro
e~
o..c
Q) .Ql
'- en
~ ro
2 ~
c ro
Q)..c
E Q)
~ro
.~ Ol
-0 Q)
ro '-
08l
z ro
C/)
-
c:
G>
E
-
C/)
::::l
......
"C
<(
:!::
"C
::::l
<(
-
c:
l'l:l
U
!E
c:
C)
en
.~ 2
c
c Q)
.Q E
t5 Q)
210
.... ....
en en
c _
o ro
u 'u
.8 ~
-0 .~
Q)-
~~
Q)....
'- 0
en ....
Coo
Q) "C
E Q)
210
2 E
en ....
en 0
'E c
Q)
c ill
Q) 5:
E..c
2 u
2i:
en 5:
ro~
'u -g
~ ro
c '-
~~
-0 C
Q) ::l
t5-o
~ 0
o .~
g 0..
::l Q)
..c
0....
5: Ol
.... c
Q) "C
ill::J .
5:-o~
en 0
en..c
Q) ~ 5:
Qj Ol ro
..c e (j)
I- 0.. ro
2
c
Q)
E
en
::l
'0
ro
-0
Q)
en
o
0..
e
0..
>,
C
ro
-
o
Ec5
o c
- '-
c 0
-0 Q)
::i-g
.,g E
en '-
'- Q)
.8..c
:.em
::l..c
<( 5:
II)
-
r:::
CI.l
E
E
o
u
r:::
o
:;::;
III
.!:!
r:::
::::J
E
E
o
u
....
r:::
CI.l
E
CI.l
OJ
ro
r:::
ro
E
:5
.~
2
r:::
CI.l
E
CI.l
CI.l
OJ
ro
(/)
'6
o
r:::
~
CI.l
5:
~
CI.l
..r:::
I-
-
r:::
CI.l
E
CI.l
OJ
III
r:::
III
2:
..r:::
-
.~
II)
-
r:::
CI.l
E
CI.l
CI.l
...
OJ
III
II)
is
:5
.~
2
r:::
CI.l
E
CI.l
CI.l
OJ
ro
(/)
'6
>-
r:::
ro
-
o
E
o
-
r:::
:Q+-i
::::J r:::
o CI.l
..r::: E
(/) CI.l
Eg>
'6 r:::
::::J ro
<( E
~
o
....
r:::
CI.l
E
CI.l
OJ
ro
r:::
ro E
E2
..r::: (/)
~ >-
5: (/)
(/) OJ
.~ E
.... ~
"S 0
U 0..
ij::: Q)
- ~
'6m
o .-
r::: u
r:::
"0 ro
CI.l r:::
Qiij:::
.... CI.l
r:::..r:::
::::J ....
o r:::
u .-
r::: (/)
CI.l ~
CI.l CI.l
5=5
:::
"0
::::J
<(
CI.l
..r:::
-
>-
CI.l
..r:::
-;;; (/)
ro 5
(/):.+:::;
.~ '6 CJi
~C(j)
::::J 0 CI.l
U U g
~oo.
"0_....
E'~'6
ro r::: ::::J
o ro
CI.l (/) CI.l
~Q):5
uo..OJ
~ -(/) .!::
"O~:S
:!20"O
::::JCI.l"O
O..r::: CI.l
-'=+-'Q:5
(/)0....
~.... r:::
,g2~
"Orou
~~~
OJ
r:::
E
.E
...
CI.l
a.
"0
CI.l
...
CI.l
-
r:::
::::J
o
o
r:::
CI.l
II)
CI.l
E
::::J
o
E
is
II)
-
r:::
CLl
E
E
o
u
r:::
o
:;::;
III
.!:!
r:::
::::J
E
E
o
u
"'5l
:::
"'C
::::J
<(
Cl
r:::
r:::
'(ij
-
r:::
o
U
II)
-
r:::
CLl
E
::::J
o
o
c
r:::.J!!
.- r:::
r::: CLl
o E
:;::; CLl
lll-
ES
"'(J)
,E-
r::: .!!!
- 0
... r:::
CLl III
..r::: r:::
au:
-(/J -g -g ~
Q) l..... .- +-'
CLl .- 0..
6' ~ o..:t=
0.. ~ ell -g
E....CLlell
wg~....
CLl..r::: g
CLl ~
..r:::eIlCLl-o
...._5$'6
.~ U Q)
(/J CLl en 5:
~(/)e
r:::(iiCLlQj-
<(,g~>
(/J.... CLl
-0:;::; ell 5:
52000
W(/)_..r:::
r::: CLl .!!! 00-
.Q :5 g ~
~-g~il
::::J ell <;::: CLl
.~ (/J- u g
o CLl'w ~
"SeIlo..
(/J-o..Q-o
+--~Q)2
r::: ..r:::'- C
~ ~.... ~.Q
~60cro
~ 'w (/J 'm E
eIl~~"53.2
2: 0... 0.. u .!::
:>,-
..Q .!!!
u
r:::
-0 ell
CLl r:::
ro~
0..
CLl u
0.. "00
ell
..Q
r:::
.Q CLl
10:5
E
o (/J
1: .~
r:::
elll~ 0..
.2 E
o
u
~g
15
.~ 10
0:5
0..
(/J
~ c .
CLl (/J
(/JEe
-l..... Q) Q)
.sOlE
'6~2
::::J ell ell
<(E1iJ
s:::
o
'-
"-'
(,)
~
e
Q
s::: -
o ~
~ s::: CJ)
{g Q) ~
o ~ C
~ e ())
s::: ' s: en
~ s::: 0>
j-.: lU ~ e
'05'0 g u
"-' :+:i "-'
e s::: () s::: ()) 0
o Q) ::J Q) 0> a..
O:;:;E:..;:.E: <("0
W~t:::~t:::Eec"O
~ 0 ~uo ~ ~ .0 ~ 2
V,I Q. Q) Q) 0> 1:5 c e
W CJ) Q "0 Q e ()) co .~ 2
I- e co ffi co a.. +-'0 .3 0 ffi
", co "0 "0 Cf) !....
V,I I.... ',... 0> ',... - I.... 0> c.9
~ I- a c a 'co a.. c ~
~ '+- it 'c it !.... - 'S; . e >.
o c I-COO::Jg>
+-,...s:::co...s:::coc>E-
c:> e g> a.. g> c ()) ()) g
o ()) 0 >. e ,Q E 0::: E ..c
0::: E.C: co ...s::: 10 e "0 f~ ~
a..~~~~~e~'-"I-
0::: Q. ~ ,Q> ~ ~ .> s: 15 if)
o o()) C/) I C/) 0::: we 6 ()) ~
...., co co !.... u
<(enQ.Q.enco~u
~:J. . :J.O.
. .
.
.
if)
w
if)
if)
w
z
~
<(
w
S
.....J
<(
0:::
W
I-
<(
~
o
z
.
if)
w
U
z
w
U
LL
W
o
I-
Z
<(
U
LL
Z
c.9
if)
o
z
if)
I-
if)
o
u
o
w
z
o
I-
if)
W
:J
a
o
z
<(
if)
c.9
z
o
Z
LL
I-
o
:J
<(
0:::
o
0:::
a..
o
z
.
.
s::::
.0
~ --
~o...
OI
&U)
0-""-
o E
(1) co
C,,) I....
s:::: 0>
co e
en . S a...
I.... u... 0.. +-'
co Q):.c ~
~.S ~ C I....
CI) 1'1\ .0 <.9
~:::J"'+-'
+-' 0 CO ==
'c :r: .e t u
:J CO 0 c
o E coo... g-~
WE~~cU
1-00+:i~C
U)UU:COI-O
w'+-(1)+-''+-+-'
I-o..t::co~
U)+-'-' +-'i..j::
~ C.c: O>~+-'
<( ~ ~ .~ E ~
~+-'O:JtQ)
I.... I.;;;. Ococ:c
<.90 ~:S I 0.. ~
Q)"'OQ)Q)co
0:::0(1)+-'0$
a... CO Cl)jg co..c
0::: "0 CI) U) "0 0>
o '0 8:. . '0 J:::
...., -
<( Ll... Ll...
~ . .
.
CJ)
UJ
CJ)
CJ)
UJ
Z
~
<(
UJ
S
.....J
<(
0:::
UJ
I-
<(
~
o
z
.
CJ)
UJ
U
Z
UJ
U
LL
UJ
o
I-
Z
<(
U
LL
Z
c:>
CJ)
o
z
CJ)
I-
CJ)
o
u
o
UJ
Z
o
I-
CJ)
UJ
:::>
a
o
z
<(
CJ)
c:>
z
o
Z
LL
I-
o
:::>
<(
0:::
o
0:::
a..
o
z
.
.
en
0)
u
C
0)
(f)
co
u
C
co
C
LL
'+-
o
+-' "'0
C 0)
I.... 0) +-'
0) E 0 en
~"'O Cen "'0
1'1 \ t:: en +-' en
",0) Cc C
....J 15 ~ 0) 0) 1'1\ 2
C C"'O 0) ~ E E o>+-'
~~~~ ~8Eo ~~
0) :J C"'O Z U " C 0>
0> en en .C ~:J
coenO)o I CD I.... 8~
Co:J- +-'~2enu:>
cozenLL ~O)+-'oco::>
~Ien~ E::.3~en"2
lenO+-, en C+-'C en en
....J"'Oz..c enO)~8~co
C I+-'O) E '" 0> ..c
<(:Jen$ en E~o~
~ LL 0) <(en 0) 0) 0> I.... :J
W U .u "'0 g> 0> 0 a. a.
z==cO) cccoocen
w..co)'+-"'Oococc +-'
f n a..:J 0> t:: 0) :.;::::; 0::::::::: co ..c C 0)
~ 1....0+-'",oO:::::::~uOen
0:: O)a.OcI....I....O):.;::::;en
OCEO)cococo+-'gco
I-cwO::~U~O)~~jg
oO)coco:JCOI....~l....ca.
:J E u u ~ .u .0 C 2 0 co
+-' C C C I.... 0) C " "
<(~cocoocoa..t: ~~
W>CCZCO:J
I- CLLu... I u...ZU...
~
(f)... ...
.
c
~ -gC/) ~ -g -- ,~
'I.J 00 CO CO -.
:S :J C 0 ,CO
0::: O)E ~~-o
0) __ :::J >- Q)
Cl)C/) 1......00cos:::: E:
S~ ~ 0.0 Q)u. Q)
'v EO::::' -0 0::
a: ~a. ~ _ N & 0) s::::
~ 0) ~ -0 >- .= 0
Q)E oO)u.~~~
s::::oo _C/)~::::""':::J
Q)C/) 0..00....,....,0):::::::
rn !:::'..c~~o::o
"-I.,J c I~ a.. .- u.. -....- Q --
-. 0 '-L.J -....- :J CI) I...... CO
a3-o ~CI) g-g Q) ~ 8
~~ 6,~o::co~Ol N
-'"' 00 a: -....- CI) Q) s:::: >-
Q .0 .S: ~ Q) ::::. 1:: u.
g.c ~ a",,:Q& 0 -0
l;;:;: 0 t""\ '_ +-' ~ 0.. ~\
.- """'" CI) c.- Q) ~
~ 10 Q) s:::: 0) '- ~ rY .....
CI) +-' 0:: Q) E 9-2 :::J ....... ~
o C Q ....,-.- ....,
Q 0) __ co 0) Q) :::J .~ 0)
E CO . - s:::: +-' 0:: u.. (,) 0::
I...... 0 (,) CO 00 '+- __ s:::: -....-
~O)oS::::..t::U5o'-'co C/)
a.N CO -. s:::: s:::: 0)
OlE s::::, I.... CI) co._ I....
s:::: >-.- - 0 Q) u.. --
'_ - u.. Q) '+- Ol CI) o>:J
t::-ou."'O:S-o"tJQ)"'OO~
8.~-g s::::0 ~.92 ~ ~~ u
Q) 00.= CO ~ :J Q q: Ol >- C/)
0:: ..c :J Ol 4:::::: "'0 '+- s:::: U. 0
- a.. O".S: Q) 0) s:::: 0 ~ C
.~ -....- 0) 1: s:::: C/) CO ~ s:::: -0 0
(,)CI)O:::::JQ)OOCl)I....:.:::J~
~ ~::::~co~.92~CI) g':J ~
s::::--v ....,-.~ CO (,) 0"0)
'- Q "" (,) s:::: 0) C/) s:::: q: 0) a..
u.. q:Q)E ~ 0::
I ac IE 00 I j-.:: I -....- I
"" . Ci5 0) U') ~ C/) CO ~ 0> CI) 0
vs::::EvQcv~vs::::U')
c:c QQ) $ c:c g. 0 c:c 1: c:c :2 c:c
C/) OOC/)l;;:;:-oC/)LlJC/)coC/)
<( ~ U5 <( ~ 0) <( ro <( .Ql <(
(9~I....(9o~(9~(9:Q(9
.j-.::J2 .Q.o..s.O.
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Presentation of GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting - 2006 Annual Financial Report
SUMMARY:
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) has a certificate program (established in 1945),
which is designed to recognize and encourage excellence in financial reporting by state and local governments. The City of Clearwater
has earned the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for its 2006 annual Financial Report. This is the 28th
year that the City has received this prestigious award.
In order to earn the Certificate of Achievement, the City of Clearwater's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report had to meet the high
standards of the certificate program. By meeting the standards of the program, the Financial Report is a more useful and understandable
tool for Clearwater's citizens, the media, and others who have a vital interest in the government. The governing body and taxpayers of
Clearwater should take special pride in the fact that their annual financial reporting document has been judged to be one of the best in its
class. The award gives bond insurers and rating agency comfort and thus insures that the City receives low interest rates on it's
borrowing.
This award reflects the commitment by many individuals to the highest standards of financial reporting. It reflects the endorsement and
support of elected and appointed officials, and is a tribute to their foresight and leadership. This award also reflects the expertise, high
degree of professionalism, and many hours of hard work by the staff involved in preparing this annual financial report. Achievement of
this award is a tribute to all of them.
The City's "CAFR" team works diligently each year to complete our financial report. This team is composed of members of the City's
Finance and Budget departments as well as financial staff from other City departments. The City takes financial responsibility and
accountability very seriously, and therefore, we have placed individuals with financial expertise in various departments around the City.
Many of these individuals are licensed CPA's. Jay Ravins, Assistant Finance Director for the City of Clearwater has the overall
responsibility for financial reporting for the City.
Our external auditors, Cherry Bekeart and Holland provided assistance in obtaining this award.
CAFR Team: Carol Barden, Andrea Beane, Fred Belzel, Bob Bublitz, Keith Bush, Judi Crawford, Laura Damico, Karen Dombrowski,
Janet Dorrough, Judith Grantham, Joyce Hunt, Linda McPherson, Karen Miles, Steve Moskun, Paul Nystrom, David Powers, Stephanie
Sansom, Barbara Schill, Mark Tedder, Earl Uchiyama, Clem Vericker, Tina Wilson, Miljana, Zdjelar.
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 3
~ c::s i: ~
'" bo '"
~ ~.5 EO ~
;:. ~ '"
a.~ '" ~
Z '" ii ~ <::s .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~
~ l:: ._~~...
e k:~C"'5
'i! ...~~&
~ ~ '" ~ 8.~ a.;.
EO ~~~]
QJ E ~ ~ <::s ~
~ ~ ~ ;:. u ~ ~
c ~"<: 5 <;::,
> \:)
~ ~.~ . &'i!
... ~ ~... ~
~ ~;"-t]E
~ ~:.:: c ~ ~
~ ~ <::s & <::s C
= -< l:: ~ c:l::: ~ bo
~ ~...... ~
U ~ EO .~ ~ ~
U ~~ ~ E 5
'-" .~ ~ ~ l:: ;:
< ..... "_ "_ c::s ~
e ~ ~ ~ '" ...
EO l::"''''
'" ~.- ~ ~
= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;: .~
~ ~ l:: .., ~
0 QJ ~ b()~ "-= ~
,,<:._.... l::
.- Z ~ I:ooJ ~ ;:s .....
...... ~~~... ~
~ ~ "::: ~ ~ ~
~ ... ~... EO'"
.- eJ)~ c~~ l:: ~
~ ~ &;:s...... ~
0 = ~ c:l:::11~~~
~ ~ .- - ~ .c EO bo ~
~ ~ ~ '_ ~ '" l::
~ .5 ~ ~ <::s
< 0 ~ 1-4'" .~ ~ il .s ~
~ .~ Q CI) ~~"<:c~
;. ~ ~ c.~ "c> ... "c> ~ 6
Cl) ~ .::; ~ .s QJ ~ ~5~~~
~ "'C :::: <::s .~ 8 ~ EO
~ ~ ~ ~ 6'- ~.., <::s
~ ~ g"-=~~
c.t-j CI) '" .., ~ ~ c
= ... ~ - E::: ~u.~ a
0 &::l.,
~ ~ ~ U
Cl) U .- ~
~ < u 0
= "'C = .0
~ = ~ ~ .-
= ~ U = u
.- ~
~ Z .-
Cl) ~
...... ......
= ~ < ~
......
Cl) 00 Z ~
e "'C =
= Cl) ~ =
;. ...... ~ =
Cl) .-
~ = ~ -<
0 ~
C-' Cl) 0 QJ
Cl) ..= ~
...... ~ .-
..= ~ ~
~ 0
< ~
.-
~ U
@ <
~
~
r---
0
0
N
00-
... N
0 ...
.... II)
u "S
II)
. !:I
Q ~
c..
~ II)
tf.l
.~
u II)
II) t;j
~
w Q
~
ilfu,jWiiidui1ti
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 3
Item # 3
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 3
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Clearwater
Florida
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2006
A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial
Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers
Association of the United States and Canada to
government units and public employee retirement
systems whose comprehensive annual fmancial
reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest
standards in government accounting
and financial reporting.
~ ~- <::3rx
President
~~~
Executive Director
Item # 3
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 3
G
Government Finance Officers Association
203 N. LaSalle Street - Suite 2700
Chicago, IL 60601
Phone (312) 977-9700 Fax (312) 977-4806
,.,
09/28/2007
NEWS RELEASE
For Information contact:
Stephen Gauthier (312) 977-9700
(Chicago )-- The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting has been
awarded to City of Clearwater by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United
States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR). The Certificate
of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and
financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government
and its management.
An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to the individual(s),
department or agency designated by the government as primarily responsible for preparing the
award-winning CAFR. This has been presented to:
Citywide Annual Financial Reporting Team (CAFR Team), City of Clearwater
The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program
including demonstrating a constructive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its
financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the CAFR.
The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving approximately 16,000 government
finance professionals with offices in Chicago, IL, and Washington, D.C.
Item # 3
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Declare the list of vehicles and equipment surplus to the needs of the City and authorize disposal through sale at the Tampa Machinery
Auction, Tampa, Florida, and authorize the appropriate officals to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
Vehicles and equipment listed have been replaced as necessary or are no longer required.
Tampa Machinery Auction is the Pinellas County Purchasing Cooperative Auctioneer of Record.
Type:
Current Year Budget?:
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:
Not to Exceed:
For Fiscal Year:
Appropriation Code
0566-00000- 364413-000-
000-0000
Other
No
Budget Adjustment:
No
Revenue
N/A
N/A
Annual Operating Cost:
Total Cost:
to
Amount
To be
determined
Appropriation Comment
Sale proceeds
Bid Required?:
Other Bid / Contract:
No
Bid Number:
Bid Exceptions:
None
Review
Approval:
1) Financial Services 2) Office of Management and Budget 3) Legal 4) Clerk 5) Assistant City Manager 6) Clerk 7) City
Manager 8) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 4
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 1
Surplus for April 17, 2008
REASON FOR
ITEM# Asset# YEAR DESCRIPTION SERIAL NUMBER MILEAGE SURPLUS I DISPOSAL
1 G0657 1987 Ford E350 Step Van 1 FCJE39H8HHB95875 29,418 Age/Numerous Mech Issues
2 G0704 1994 Ford F350 Dump Truck 1 FDJF37HXRNB62861 70,547 Age/Condition
3 G1595 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier 4 Dr. Sedan 1 G1 JC5245T7247446 87,893 Age/Condition
4 G1811 1997 Myers Seth 6" Trash Pump SPMJGH501164 N/A Age/Condition
5 G2064 1999 Chevrolet Step Van 1 GBKP32YXX3307570 101 ,553 Age/Condition
6 G2095 1999 Ford Taurus 4 Dr. Sedan 1 FAFP52UOXA220851 82,904 Age/Condition
7 G2131 1999 Kubota B7100 Loader/Backhoe 78811 N/A Age/Condition
8 G2141 1999 GMC Sonoma 4x4 Ext Cab Pickup 1 GTDT19XXX8527697 100,533 Age/Condition
9 G2150 1999 Chevrolet Lumina 4 Dr. Sedan 2G1WL52M9X9276314 77,610 Age/Condition
10 G2178 2000 Chevrolet Lumina 4 Dr. Sedan 2G1WL52J5Y1108790 72,791 Age/Condition
11 G2217 2000 Ford F350 Dump Truck 1 FDWF36S4YEB58712 111,038 Age/Condition
12 G2360 2001 GMC Sonoma Pickup 1 GTCS14W818221 022 89,845 Bad Transmission
13 G2364 2001 Chevrolet 3500HD w/Utility Body 3GBKC34G21 M111810 124,418 Condition
14 G2722 2003 Toro Workman 2110 Utility Veh. 230000290 N/A Bad Transmission
15 N/A 19707 Kohler 3000 watt port. Generator 319556 N/A Age/Condition
Item # 4
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Terminate the PGP Gas Supply Agreement and its obligations previously adopted under Resolution 04-34 and adopt Resolution 08-05.
SUMMARY:
On February 15,2008, the Florida Gas Utility (FGU) Executive Committee authorized the reassignment of FGU' s share in the Public
Gas Partner (PGP) Pool 1 , termination of FGU' s PGP Project, and subsequent withdrawal by FGU from PGP.
The City of Clearwater originally approved the FGU's PGP Gas Supply Agreement 1 by Resolution 04-34 on December 2, 2004, to
include the proposed form of the Natural Gas Production Sharing Agreement for Gas Supply Pool 1.
Several factors led to FGU's decision to terminate the PGP project, but the primary factor was that the level of effort and workload
associated with the PGP gas, especially once permanent financing is required and physical delivery of the gas begins, will make the
project uneconomical for the volumes available to FGU, when compared to other potential alternatives for discounted gas supplies. The
other non-FGU partners in PGP are still desirous of amending the Production Sharing Agreement to re-open the acquisition period and
to change reserve criteria from Proved Developed Producing (PDP) to Proved. This may increase the likelihood of success in acquiring
additional properties but increases the reserve risk factor, which Clearwater Gas and the other FGU partners do not recommend..
FGU will receive a lump sum payment from PGP on behalf of the other non-FGU PGP members that will take assignment of FGU' s
share for $270,000. This will be the full and complete payment from PGP for FGU' s interests in the assets of Pool 1. FGU has deferred
development costs of just over $200,000 which will be paid from the payment. Any additional legal fees associated with documents
related to the assignment and termination of the project will be paid from the $270,000 payment. Any remaining funds after the
payment of all of the obligations will be distributed to the FGU project participants in proportion to entitlement shares as reflected in
FGU's PGP Gas Supply Agreement 1. The lump sum payment is in addition to the $0.20/MMBtu distribution that the FGU project
participants have received since June 2006.
Type:
Current Year Budget?:
Other
Yes
Budget Adjustment:
None
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:
Not to Exceed:
For Fiscal Year:
Annual Operating Cost:
Total Cost:
to
Review
Approval:
1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Gas System 4) Office of Management and
Budget 5) Legal 6) Clerk 7) Assistant City Manager ED 8) Clerk 9) City Manager 10) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 5
I\. I ,"L..\J\....IL.\J I 1\....11"41 \....II I I IL.. VI I I \....II VL.L..I\.I ,"V VI\. IL..l '",
FLORIDA, TERMINATING THE PGP GAS SUPPLY
AGREEMENT AND ALL OBLIGATIONS RELATED
THERETO AS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED UNDER
RESOLUTION 04-34 ON DECEMBER 2, 2004; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater, in its capacity as a Member of Florida Gas
Utility ("FGU"), approved and adopted Resolution No. 04-34 on December 2, 200t4:~rttl6l: number 1
"Resolution") approving the form of the PGP Gas Supply Agreement, with the pr~os&d
form of the Natural Gas Production Sharing Agreement for Gas Supply Pool No. 1 (the
"Production Agreement") by and between Public Gas Partners, Inc. ("PGP") and Florida
Gas Utility, as amended, attached thereto; and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater, in its capacity as a Member of FGU, hereby
approves the termination of the PGP Gas Supply Agreement and its obligations under
Resolution 04-34 and the PGP Gas Supply Agreement, and releases FGU from all
obligations thereunder, to be effective subject to all necessary actions of the PGP
Board and Operating Committee in approving the express assumption by other
members of PGP, of all duties, responsibilities and obligations that FGU may have
presently, in the future, or which may have accrued or otherwise, through an
assignment; and
WHEREAS, upon the effective date of the assignment of FGU's interest in the
Production Agreement to other members of PGP, the City of Clearwater shall be
consequently released of all obligations under Resolution No. 04-34, the PGP Gas
Supply Agreement, and the Natural Gas Production Sharing Agreement for Gas Supply
Pool No.1; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the termination of the PGP Gas
Supply Agreement and its obligations thereunder to be effective upon the effective date
of the assignment of FGU's interest in the Production Agreement to other members of
PGP or as otherwise provided by the terms of such assignment.
Section 2. The officer or officers authorized in Resolution 04-34 are hereby
authorized to execute and deliver a formal termination and release of the PGP Gas
Supply Agreement, if requested by FGU.
Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
,2008.
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Laura Lipowski
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Accept funding and approve the corresponding agreement from the Juvenile Welfare Board totaling $116,098 for funding of two
middle-school aged summer camp programs and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
The City of Clearwater Parks and Recreation Department has been awarded funding totaling $116,098 for FY 07-08 from the Juvenile
Welfare Board. Council approval is required for each subsequent year of the agreement.
The City programs a summer camp for economic all y disadvantaged children aged 10-14 years at the N. Greenwood Recreation
Complex and Ross Norton Recreation Complex, serving 140 children aged 10-14 years, camp activities will include: math and reading
practice, drama, visual art, poetry, pottery, fitness, swimming, field trips, games and sports. This program is compatible with JWB's
Strategic Plan in the following areas: providing a substance abuse program, skill development activities, children aged 10-14 years,
community-based activities, structured activities, support from 3 or more adults, quality services and activities while preventing
problem behaviors.
The City will provide in-kind support to the Middle School Aged Summer Scholarship Program by providing supervisory oversight and
some staff and operating fund assistance. 0.76 FTEs have been transferred into this program from existing summer camp staff. $3,120 in
operating funds were transferred from an existing summer camp program.
There is no requirement to continue the program when the grant ends.
The following special project numbers have been established for accounting purposes: 181-99886 - Juvenile Welfare Board! Ross
Norton Recreation Center
181-99887 - Juvenile Welfare Board! N. Greenwood Recreation Complex
Last FY, the Juvenile Welfare Board combined the summer camp and year round teen programs into one agreement. They were
separated this year into two different agreements. The teen program was approved in November 2007.
Type:
Current Year Budget?:
Budget Adjustment Comments:
JWB Grant Funding
Current Year Cost:
Not to Exceed:
For Fiscal Year:
Other
Yes
Budget Adjustment:
No
$116,098.00
$116,098.00
2007 to 2008
Annual Operating Cost:
Total Cost:
$116,098.00
$116,098.00
Appropriation Code
181-99886
181-99887
Amount
$82,430.00
$33,668.00
Appropriation Comment
Review Approval: 1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) Clerk 6) City Manager 7) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 6
g
.
DL
L
L:
1mJ.
L
I
-
lC5
.BIJ
I
- - ~- - --
_I.~~
~
~~ .-=
- -- ~tachment number 1
Page 1 of 31
I,~ 1;~.: ~~;~I:.::-:::~ .\.-:)
::.~:I ~~~~~.-~~:.~ f;{ ~ ~.~r<';. :?~:... )!.0~:'/ ..~A' (:;~~.::.
~~ ~~'t\~t~ :~tt.....:.?-'":
...
~
.~~<r.. \:~ ~f'~~;:{~i~'i:~~~.).(
lip ~
-
___w:_
Item # 6
~
-= ~.
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 31
.
.
II
Ii
m
.
.
.
.
lID
f\II?~
--
~
:.:~U/~.i . ~i~~;~~i7i~i .~~~:I
Item # 6
~
;;
~
~
-
- =- g
~chment number 1
Page 3 of 31
~ ~./~~; ~ :~~~ .~.- ~~~ ~ ~/!~) ~-.t~'>.>A .~.i
-b
~
~1fIlIL
~f
..I~
~
_____1___
~.~~
-
~~
~ Jl!ldli~l!:li~-= f]i
:it!
'tS~0..;~.:.t;;~ ,.,,>/,-..;,.
.
~,~
~~
fir
~~
dIlL
.~
::0i)(~ ~.:..{4 . ~;_~.;~~~~r~~~~:~~~~):..\ ~~S {i::.~~ ~..-::~f.~~~~j="=. f~\ G!~~~.
.
III
~I~.L
ma
l.",
.
~
;>\i=:;7\:. ~~'i;~7f~~~!=~~:~<~~;;'~~....:. "'~.
-
Item # 6
!Ii
~-~
"'_____ i.l ~~_
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 31
';$':.',-~::t;~:dltt;r~}J~J!
L
" J.~ ~8r1~t~~1~i<> ~~~}:L}S~~\.~.:t.r.
..
L
~~.~~. :;:.; ~: .:!{~1:~~.~~/;. L ~f\:: ~~~~~~~~~;f.i\\~~~-=~.~. ~~_~~t~
!Wfi
.1:~ {.~}~./"i~_~:~{ ~::~.:X;~~ ~~~\:!_7):~~ ~
L
L
.IIlB
~ ~r~~ :::~:~;i/J;.~~~./~: ff:":
It~ ~;f~~~J~/:0 .r::);:,~r~i$;.;j~/:~-~
Item # 6
...
~
.
~.
-"'" -"~~~ ~ ~
- - Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 31
II
1m
II
.
L
L
Iii
-
.
.
ii
~~~...: .:~}r~-\).~.:I~f.~/.~~.;,~~.~
m
:.~~~.~~..:~: ":.' ~:rm;-~~{?
Item # 6
00
.
~l
--~~
~..-
-
~ - ~
- .. Attachment number 1
Page 6 of 31
IL
~
II.
Ita
lib
I&:t
R.:
IlL
II
III
"
DJ
--
~
~~~.." t:':.:\~~0 .~~~~\ f'~~.f.:~:~?-
11.~
-
;\~(\:;~~~?~~~~-!,}~/fi:.;~t;~:r:.~~.~ ~I;.~
Item # 6
.
w
..-
~:
=-~~~,.
-..
-----
~~ .
Attachment number 1
Page 7 of 31
JRllllll1jlllJllJlll]
:,V~ \ .~. .i~.-":. ~d5~. \...:;.:~~ j. ~:S;:\':'~T.
~:~ ~~~:!:J~ ; ~ ~j';~:.~-:: ":..:"(i ~ (~~.~~ ~t~}~=:6~;1 ~.~ C~.l.<~~.~. ..\j~::.:.^:~._~ ~ 'p; t~~ :~~. ~.""ii ..y~.
I
(i-~i~~~~tj/X;~l~~;;'~:;;'~ \~ <)~ \'~~;~
-
-
;Jl
t 0 ) ~ ~~:X~~l ~~:~;~?;s. .~L!-~;~ ~lf,\.:. ~~ ~
~!A~
..
.
~
'~;~;;' ::(<<j~~~l{.t;!/{j~!./.:.t:~:
:V:!({l;./;0.~f~::~ );.~~;;/~~??\~f:.)~
~~q...~~s?~ ~<y~/ ;~\~ifj
Item # 6
BI
----
fi>~: ~t.:~~ =) \.~~. ~) : ~ ~J~.~Ty/z~. ~.Lri~~~ ~~~~~f.\; ":~/~~:U);.:,~) ~~~t; ~~: ~ :.~t-: 'J~(~~\~~~g:4?"f ~.~~
.r..
II:
;,
~.~
II
.
~~V~
Attachment number 1
Page 8 of 31
II
I
.
.
:: ~:~\::~ ~~?~>r1.ri.:{;~t ~ :.~ f!:.,'
~lI!IIf'
Item # 6
;r;
~, iiiIi
..
~aChm~ number 1
Page 9 of 31
": t;~ ~S~;~~~.:f~~tt:\~:;..~---= ~~.~~~::F.~V:~-~:-1.~~ ;S1j ~~~. ;~~,~f~::j. .~.f~;(" .:~
~x~/~=...!~.~ -- ~
=t~~
-
......
~
~~
.
rd
I
_ 1lEllWJ1tmr
r.~. :}:.).. . <~"X~!;;.:~ ;/;.....~/F.?f
,
Item # 6
.
it!
-
-~
--a.-
-
. .:.~ ~
~tachment number 1
Page 10 of 31
--
II
II
.
I~ ~f0;{\~0~~~t.:~:.:W~:;I~Q~;" \?~",~:~,~V~. *i;)f.~~f~...:X:;",~:;~:~~. :" )~~r~~; ~;:i~.~ \: ~~.~ii~~~:~~)~.~.~~~~::~~.:~ -~;Jr~tS: ~ ~~ :~J>~\~.i~ ~ ~.(4~:-\:':i ;~~i~:i.~."l~ ~;.~_.~~~
6l
!i
r~T
~.~
~$~ ~ ~\:~.j.~ ~:<}:~~;:C~~~;f~~(
Item # 6
j!i;!
-
-
~~_ ..dJl. ___
._fl
~ ....
Attachment number 1
Page 11 of 31
--
,.,~~~~~~~~t~k~1~+tj*1fJi~~:;i1*r?~W4~~~E.~~~~~i*}1~r.:;
I.V~~i!;/~~V-:'~5~~ ~:.~ ~;.~~{:~~ .;~+'~~t' ~<:~~~}'~\~~~~?'~~:~i~~. ~#~~~j~~~;nJ:~ -~ ~\i ~
00
.
I nA..
~
~~
"
IiijJlil II IW.J imW/,
i\
-
:~_:.
-
-
~~-
Attachment number 1
Page 12 of 31
-
2:
.
~
I BIfS_
~~~-}r~l:i:j~ ,;"~: "{..;-.;!::J ~~~~:
i\\
~
...
. --= .....-\!;; ~.-
..
~ ~-~,,- -=
tachment number 1
Page 13 of 31
~---
~A!';i-~
.
----'~
...
_.i\~?:~~;;..;.:JJ .<<~:~S~.;.(;~
.11I
~
.
~
~.i:R -1;1_ ~
~
:c:
I
llUlU_!
~f}.~~} ~~~~~.{o~,;-\~,~\;:;:~~)r-
=--- --" - --=--=-- -
.
Attachment number 1
Page 14 of 31
=
:E
- ----
...-
~:..=-. .
Attachment number 1
Page 15 of 31
-,.
r-;~l ..
dr~ ~r
.
Item # 6
.
j!/;l
--
.
-..=~
-- -~
~- ~ -
~ttachment numbe~ 1 -
age 16 of 31
~~
.
rl
iQ
Item # 6
~
.
~-~
~.:"...::iL..-----=-
-
~lluel
Page 17 of 31
--
.
111II1I
'?~ :'". './~ _~ ~:Xt~;; .:.I/P. ~~~~~~i\~"'t~~!f.'1:~ 12":" Z./)/~~t~j'~'-s~if\":~(~.~--;' ~~~~~"~<=:~~ t7.~~':::,~:
i. : ~:~~~<~f~I:;:'~fi~__~^~~~r;(:~
.
~~~~v~
~-----1'12!
-~---..
----=--~------
~
lIIIJI
IlL:
.
.
~
IWlg
IC-~
=~
-
=-6fI-
S0.h?j.;-;di::~;~--. -
=.!:...~~.M~:-:....) ..::..-.,;". ...... ';'.ay:--: ~ 1 ".r:"
.: . .,:.~::---~. :--"--::.-- ~ ::. -:....}.: .'.. .: I:~' .
.
-. ...~~
a~
..:-..__~~~~ ~_~~~ .!II 'J -.JI E .~
~.JIII ~!'3 ~ ::-: miil:i tr
JI~
1~ ~::~':,?;~'~i~. ~::~~~~~f~.~/:'-;;
II
. .
~
',\,
-~
.
(""
. .
- __ - ---..: .-.". J -- ~-.._.- ""':'...
:.W...<~~~~i;~.;~:f~ d-. ~ ~~:'0:
i~.~f~~~.~ ~.~.;j~~j.:h\:.~~I'~^:l~;~:~~;~.; ~~r} ~;~:~~; X (Z r:.~ ~~ ~.).~
-
~
LIr-
...
~~
~-~
-"'""""
-
.~
...
~ 11~lS'"!li!liill=- II~
- :....:
,-:-
-
_.ilIII~I~
~
^t~tb~,~;;~}-~<:4;;:*~f:;~l.l~~~~~
91
III
~~~:l"::m ;:
-
-
_A
_ill
~jl1~
~
.
~"[ - -.-'----;,J
~.
---
-
~~
-
"",_~.E'
L :if V 1l'='
-
..
.~ :?:s~~~~?~.~~<<~0:.:~:~;.~~~~~~~
11m
IL
~
..
f.-T
-.....
_----eo. ---,-
-
.,.~
I
!:Ii
.
-
.
b:
~;=v
..
.
~
-
_.-':":ii
--
""~~~I;;~lC ~ i!E ~ .iiiL
-
~~:t: ~V~~J~/:.::~.}(~:~~\: ~~I~~
l!!I!'! ---.--elIm.iIi 'J>>-
.
--
.
tr'~ ~ _ ~1~ ._
~
~l~~S{.;..~fi.~~\~:~.I:: r: ~: '.
.
. .
~
-
-
Jit,~l!O~~~~
~- -
.
IlL
-~~
-
~ ~ sa~"'.=-;iii;i'Jt..iii" .llJirI' '2:~1~~:-: ~ ~:r--~ L~ ~
--- ~1iJ.-.m.
,.
III
~
~
~~ !!!ii ~= ~ ~
- rii'.Ja'i L"~ii-Oll
III
III
~~tf!iifI';. __ ""'_
~~I
~1M'v-
-.-
E
III
J~ --':.h:~~~ -::.:
-1tl1lmi'iU~
:t'i!!==.
!i
.
~--
.... -A~.umber 1
a 1
-
=
1-
~D'lil.~"~j ..1. ~~~_1I_~ -~ -=
~
.
Ii!i:I
.
-
_ ~ ~li:!;'wm
IIiiIIi1lm
=--a _ '\'R_
1If-_aF~
-
-.--
-=- e!!i@lr - ~
..
II Ull
,~ ~~l:.~ _~
~ l't,iSl rJijL
~iI
~
.
--
.
-
-- _I~I
-
.
..:~~W~tGl~';f(j1_~'::f.~!:
=Ri:~
-:"-~I~.;; .1~ I~':~. ~};r.. ~~.:)'.f~J.:~\f~..~-
.
~
1>....1.-
~
'~ :_~.: ~~~ ~;~~~: .1f0~.;,~~i:t~\~; ~~..~ ~i~~~.:
..
M!~~.i. - - ,..
-
~.,.;;;
~
~~--s&'..
-
-~~
..
~~iF'~:II ~.:.::.~ ......
. -
II III
.
.
~
II ill
~
.
o;<Z'~~_.
:....u~
--
-
...
~ - ~~1.~-,!1/'11 A Ell!ii...
-
M7'~~~ ...
'I!=tr
.:
-
.,
.
~
....-=
-
-
Attachment number 1
Page 21 of 31
.
.
~~3"'~~~
~
"_~--P
w
II
dI
.
;~:~__~h_ -1Iii ~I;!" rt~ T!..
~....-
_ddII~
<>>Dm
-.. ..~~'W- m-=~5----
~ __"!T~ ~V..
...
.
~
.....
~
iiL
'miig~;A
II
.,
~
t1i~~~~~
-
-
.
.
..
",....-~~~~
~-_.~.~~ - -
e
.
.F~~ ~ = ..- -.-
~
.iii
III
.
:;;.4; 5ill:!. :-1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ :.:1...
~ o:i~ :1lD~
.
!ill
-
~
~~!:i
1...
~- ~Chment numbe~
Page 22 of 31
~
~-r;;~l:E. T
..-
~~t:~!<~1- I.~~. S;.~~~~~f Y~..;~.t
..
-_.-
-
~i!!!i'
~,.!i ::r ~ lii1i
F.~~
---
~
-
-
_,,~ _ ~ JI!!I!::-. ~
-
II
-
..~.I
L__
l' ~ ~.Wliil
= -:.:: ---- -=-
~~~1a~~ .
zlI
..
II
~
~~ ~~~I
~-
:.liii_~_ ~
~"""""'~~..
;;ill
[litis
~
II
.
.
!7 ~:~~~~ I! r~ ~ - T!!!!i ~ iIi/~
-=siiI!ii
~~~ ~~?lC
..
III
112
~-II.1E
il
.,~
--
~~- -
-
~.-
.-
_'JISif --~ ~ --:- ~
'II!i -=- ....
&11
!Ni'lBii 11II
III!
lie
~~
- -.-F,K!'~ r.
.
~
,~;ll:~=- .i! . . ~J~ ~~~Ij;I~I~ _ ~~~
"fill" '~tIVfltI
II
Ii
..............._--~I:'.. ............. .- -:_I........F. -:r--'_~::....- ..___
-
-------~
A chment number 1
Page 23 of 31
-
.
-
i~:
8!1~:~ -~
T
II
~ir~
},j~'."'"
=...... -
..-.-:: -~_. ~- -~.........-
--
__~~~ . E.i~{: ~~
-
..
&-'1111.I
d.
IJI
-~~
~
.
.-'~~~ ~
_~~.~~ L
--~-
. ~:>:I
~
~~~~__J.!
..
~
dI
-
~~,::.
-
_ ~iiii ~~= ~=-~
-
--
- ~ 'i -=- ~~.~i~...iiiiiU_~""'.- ~........,~
~
-
~
~
:~ \i!6:t~~:.!71~~~~}i~ ~}.~.ttJ.:~.
III
III
.
. r (~~: .;>. ~~~~\~fr~{/. ~~. ~<:"::.~~. ~.P':~~~\. :.~.~
-
[~L!ilfI ~EmK ~:Jl iii~~l
~1I11il1l-li!tiJl
~ ii!Iil!::- --
1
':.
II!:: :.WI>",Y-ii ...:::.
~ ~
111
.
~~~~
--
~
---- -';:.
~~a
--
-=__~ "j~"Ml :r~
~
~
.y
.
j!ii!II ,/~.. iE.. -
.. -.lij Zi ...
~Jj~
~ ~
~~~~
~,--- ~
- -----
.rI1II1'''_
~
r.!!
· 1.\1
~~
j,g! liw ~
-
-
~
~~J......~
--...
:. -
Attachment number 1
Page 24 of 31
-
_ !:!lW".'
1~)<>:.2t>b;,~i;~0:..~'~~ .~
~
III
.
.
~f.rJi~:~:-~.1~.~~. :~.~~~~.':1i?\%;!
~f~:;~~ :../~.; :). ~~~:~.-::;:~\::~~~~~:.;~::
.
;::.'.~~':~"l./;.;\~.~ ~~:~:y~,-;:.~:.\" . .tt
II
-:a.
71.1
~
!IS
~-~.-
~..N;;L._..
~
~g...:
~
'j:~ ~.
-~!I
R~:h. ._~. _ ______
-
..
J1_~_
!;>!;,. _."....i_
-
_ .~JlIlliiI [II ~
-
.:.:. - g,---..~
..
.... ~ _ L~ "T_
Attachment number 1
Page 25 of 31
11-
n
:JD~
IF
.. _ !:l\imll~ .i'i.!ill~~
..
dAm
.
~..lIIt..
-
.
I'll
~~--- ,- -~
~~~
II
.
...
.~~ p:: ~~ ~a;a. _
~!2!fJ[ !a'~
~.e!
1i\'i
.
.
-
...
.-.-
-
.
m
~~
!!II _ I~ -=-
~. .~ ~ :.~~ 0.t.:.lf~i:;: .\:tJ~.
.
- -Z",!,~
.II
.
--
---
~='i~iI.t!!I!li:r ~BO~ _
~:~~---==- . ~
.
IIIfI
lLaiw!lJ~
.
ill
~...-~
- ::I -=--=
i:>.~
_ _ [I ~1!&..P,l~::-
..
..~1~
.
HI
-.
~
~
.
~~
11
-
~
-- :,~
-:-.
--=-=-~- - - -- - .__.~........,.."..
_ ~Iii.
Attachment number 1
Page 26 of 31
..
III
~~~I:r .t=!iiiiliIl
111
...
III
~
III
=-- ___~UL~.....,~.~~ _
....
~
r~;;XL~ff: ~y~ ~~.~~,~\.~~~~;0~?~.'
.
..=~~j-"""-'
,-
~~!3!:! l!5Z~ [=~
)o~~iWf .. ~~~~
u:::~ -
HII_
111
~....~
""
.,-- l{ i ~.tJ
~
~
~
-
.,
~ = ~i!Al!l!~-=~ ..~i~
IL
.
.
IF.~ .__--
~ ~.Eii.f ~ilNilf" _.,
A-~~.
.
...
A7 ~,\~r~r)~.:~}~~~t:{t;~J~? ~~:2~
II
.
go
.. -
~~~
~ -----
tachment number 1
Page 27 of 31
~
~
II
.II
-
T-----
~
~
!!!!III~~!! ~~aryar ~ ~!'ii = ~~-:;:!iL"fl'~__ ~.
la'S!
~-
~e~
1m
III
-
-
--~
-
.
~ ~e: :-= _~I.j"ii~~.3I :J!Ii!!::i-~:=-.
"<ii!
-
--~
II
..
IIii!l j~I!>i~.ii'~
...~
.~~~-~.. .
_______..~~I......~.!!:!;~i:L-- ~
_ s.
-= 1."111
~
r
,.
.
~1il:.WUR~
_L~-
-
~iiiiE
.~~~1..I,lg] ~
... .:i
_ __ _nm_ _J;!!( ~~
~~
~
'-t(~i:I";-=.D-:f:~~~~~0~~;:.:}.(~.
a
WIill
~r Jl
.
ll@t~ ~
~.....
~~
~ ~~.,...---
~._-~~
.
.
.
.
.
Ii~
::/,rj .~~~~~G.:i!:\~~~"'"}.j~:' ~':;~/l:~~~~
II
.
.
rJl
.
. _ _ ______i'i"ir!.~-
-
--~
-
_ L~~~"iIJ! !ii
Attachment number 1
Page 28 of 31
m
II..
.
~lil.ftll ~~~
~ ..-
-_._-~~-~.
~
-"'!
--
~
~~!11~_
-
.
IIIC
.
_~rm;rL
.
I~
Item # 6
.
II;
iU
.
__ ~.."",...u
~
-
~
~ =
ment number 1
Page 29 of 31
~
11IIII
~!~~~~~~~2--
~-
I)
I
....
..
.
.
~
~
. .
. .
i:!ll
..,~ ,~__ _._..----_ .__n..
~ ~.i_~
~
.
Attachment nu
Page 30 of 31
-aliBI
Item # 6
~
"'IIIi:~
~:::':l.~,
-
~
D
.
.
-~
.
~;;.~}~^~r7. ~.t _ ;:" ~ /~1Y\~j~ >;{~'~
!iii!
~nt numbe1'7
Page 31 of 31
Item # 6
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Contract (Blanket Purchase Order) for $3,930,000 to McMullen Oil Company, Inc, of Clearwater, FL for the purchase of
unleaded and diesel fuel for City Motorized equipment as per Transport award of City of Clearwater RFP 12-05 and authorize the
appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
This blanket purchase order covers the purchase of unleaded and diesel fuel delivered to the City fuel facility located at the Solid Waste
compound on Hercules Ave. This fuel is used for all City equipment.
This is the 4th year of a 5 year contract.
Type:
Current Year Budget?:
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:
Not to Exceed:
For Fiscal Year:
Purchase
Yes
Budget Adjustment:
None
$3,930,000
Annual Operating Cost:
Total Cost:
$3,930,000
5/1/08 to 4/30/09
Appropriation Code
566-06611-550500-519-000
Amount
$3,930,000
Appropriation Comment
BPO
Review
Approval:
1) Financial Services 2) Office of Management and Budget 3) Legal 4) Clerk 5) Assistant City Manager 6) Clerk 7) City
Manager 8) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 7
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Award Design Build Contract for the Downtown Boatslips project to Misener Marine Construction, Inc. in the amount of
$10,522,765.05 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same, and authorize staff to initiate financing of the project, and
authorize funding from Central Insurance Fund reserves in the amount of $2,736,097 to advance the $1.5 million to be paid by the CRA
over 3 years and the $1,236,097 of grant funds anticipated once the permitting is complete.
SUMMARY:
As a result of the March 2007 referendum which approved the downtown boat slips project, work began on the "Design Build" phase of
this waterfront project. A request for proposal (31-07) produced three bidders (two qualified). The two qualified bidders were
interviewed, then rated and ranked based on the criteria outlined in the RFP. Misener Marine was ranked highest of the respondents, for
which subsequent negotiations with the design/build team proved successful.
The proposed design contains 132 wet slips in addtion to approximately 1800' of side tie mooring and 630' of free transient mooring.
Design and permitting is expected to be completed by December 31, 2008. The construction phase is to begin the first of the year (2009)
and expected to be complete by June 30, 2009.
The estimated $12,972,350 cost of the project consists of the following:
Boat Slips:
Construction Contract $10,522,765
5% contingency $ 526,138
$11,048,903
Upland Improvements:
Sidewalks, curbs, lighting, etc.
Restrooms/Dock masters office
Electric
Water, Sewer, etc.
Fumiture/Equipment
Misc.
10% contingency
Public Art
Total Costs
$128,439
$12,972,350
The funding for this project:
Financing Proceeds $10,250,000
Central Insurance Fund Reserves
Advance for CRA$I,500,000
Advance for Grant 1,236,097
2,736,097
DDB
FY07
FY08
50,000
50,000
100,000
Less: Spent to Date (113,747)
Totol Funding $12,972,350
$808,114
$246,154
$321,260
$149,755
$75,000
$31,542
$163,183
$1,795,008
A budget amendment to reflect the above budget and funding will be made as part of the mid-year budget amendments.
OV€f.M€ffiG...
Type:
Current Year Budget?:
Debt-Bond
Yes
Item # 8
Budget Adjustment:
Yes
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:
Not to Exceed:
For Fiscal Year:
10,522,765.00
Annual Operating Cost:
Total Cost:
to
Appropriation Code
0362-93405- 563800- 57 5-
000-0000
0315-93405-563800-575-
000-0000
Amount
10,151,653.00
Appropriation Comment
371,112.00
Bid Required?:
Other Bid / Contract:
Yes
Bid Number:
Bid Exceptions:
None
Review
Approval:
1) Engineering 2) Financial Services 3) Office of Management and Budget 4) Legal 5) Clerk 6) Assistant City
Manager 7) Clerk 8) City Manager 9) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 8
Prepared by: MS
Downtown Boat Slips Final Budget
2008 Estimated 2009 Proposed
Cost Category Construction Cost Budget
Boat Slip Improvements
Dock System Installation $4,348,330
Piling and Pile Driving $2,175,310
Subtotal $6,523,640 7,479,723
Plumbing System $494,208 477,819
Electrical System $945,067 1,867,232
Security System $68,694 87,939
Rip Rap Existing Seawall $326,297 167,920
Bonding (from below 1) 111,481
Engineering and Permitting (Included in above) 612,866
Less Sales Tax Savings (Min) (282,215)
Contract Total 10,522,765
5% contingency (from below 2) 526,138
Upland Improvements
Parking Lot Improvements $76,708 moved to parking
Other Upland Improvements (upland enhancements) 808,114
Demolition of existing - $139,036
Sidewalks - $204,197
Curbs - $96,800
Landscaping - $128,486
Drainage/Erosion Control - $71,665
Furniture (beaches/trash) - $10,100
Bollard lighting - $97,400
Other lighting - $37,030
Traffic (veh. bollards, striping)- $23,400
Restrooms/Showers/Dock $246,154 246,154
Master Office
Utilities
Electrical $460,250 321,260
Water, Sewer, Fire $170,590 149,755
Cable/Telephone
Furniture/Equipment - office/docks 75,000
Miscellaneous 31,542
Uplands Total 1,631,825
10% contingency (from below 2) 163,183
Other Related Costs
Performance Bond
$190,740
(to above 1)
Preparation of Design Criteria Package &
$34,347 (already included
SUB TOTAL
$225,087
$9,536,695
$1,430,504
(to above 2)
Contingency (15%)
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 2
Item # 8
4/10/20084:21 PM
Bayfront Project Summaries
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 2
Downtown Boat Slips - 93405
Fund 315
Budget
Special Development Fund 436,796
Downtown Development Board #1 50,000
486,796
Expenditures
Financial Feasibility/Market Study 48,000
Professional Services (Eng/Arch) 305,044
Misc. Public Communications 19,036
Other 5,226
(377,306)
Open Commitments
Professional Services (Eng/Arch) 74,890 (74,890)
Available Balance 34,600
Additional Budget
CRA (FY09-FY11) 1,500,000
Less CRA to public art (78,439)
1,421,561
Total Available for Construction 1,456,161
Fund 362 (Bond Funded)
Budget
Bonds - construction proceeds 10,250,000
Expenditures
Professional Fees 92,408
Misc. 500
(92,908)
Open Commitments
Professional Fees 5,439 (5,439)
Total Available for Construction 10,151,653
Fund 325 (Public Art)
Budget
DDB #2 (FY08) 50,000
CRA (FY09) 78,439
Total Available for Public Art 128,439
Summary
Currently Available in 315 1,456,161
Currently Available in 362 10,151,653
Total Currently Available 11,607,814
Grant Awarded 1,236,097
Potentional Pump Out Grant ?
Total Available for Construction 12,843,911 (0)
Available for Public Art 128,439
Total 12,972,350
Prepared by: MS
Item # 8
4/10/20084:21 PM
I
-....
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment from the Residential Suburban (RS) (City and County) category to the Residential
Low (RL) and Institutional (I) category, Zoning Atlas Amendment from the A-E Agricultural Estate District (County) and Low Density
Residential (LDR) District (City) to the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Institutional (I) Districts (City) for property
located at 3280/3290 McMullen Booth Road (consisting of two parcels of land including Lot 1 Geiger Tract and the east 308.25 feet of
the Northwest 1;.4 of the Northwest 1;.4 of Section 21, Township 28 South, Range 16 East less the south 208.75 feet and less the west 84
feet and less the east 100 feet thereof for road right-of-way and Pass Ordinances 7942-08, 7943-08 and 7944-08 on first reading.
(ANX2005-02003 and LUZ2005-02002)
SUMMARY:
The subject site is comprised of two parcels of land totaling 4.50 acres in area. The site is located on the west side of McMullen Booth
Road approximately 500 feet north of Mease Drive. Approximately 0.358 acres located at the northeastern corner of the property is
located within unincorporated Pinellas County and is generally undeveloped. The remainder of the site is located in the City of
Clearwater and is occupied by 14 attached dwellings within several one-story buildings.
The annexation, future land use plan amendment and rezoning are requested by the applicant, Spinecare Properties, LLC who intends to
construct a 45,000 square foot two story medical office building. The Community Development Board reviewed cases ANX2005-
02003, LUZ2005-02002, and DV A2005-0000l at its public hearing on May 17,2005 and unanimously recommended approvaL The
Community Development Board also approved site plan (FLD2005-0l0l4) with 16 conditions at that meeting.
These requests were removed from consideration at the June 16, 2005 Council Meeting pending completion of an appeal of the
Community Development Board's approval of the applicant's flexible development site plan application for the property. The applicant
prevailed in the appeal and has requested that the City Council review the pending annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning
applications.
In August 2007, due to the delays caused by litigation, the Planning Director approved a time extension to September 6, 2008. Provided
the pending applications are approved by City Council, an application for building permit needs to be initiated to construct
improvements by September 6, 2008.
The applicant is requesting the annexation in order to consolidate the entire property within the City of Clearwater boundaries and to
receive sewer and solid waste service. The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the
following standards specified in the Community Development Code:
. The proposed annexation will not have an adverse impact on public facilities and their level of service.
. The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide Plan, the Community Development
Code and Pinellas County Law.
. The proposed annexation is contiguous to existing municipal boundaries and represents a logical extension of the boundaries.
Please refer to the annexation staff report (ANX2005-02003) for the complete analysis. The Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) staff
reviewed this annexation and no objections were raised.
The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Plan Map designation from Residential Suburban (RS) (County) to
Residential Low (RL) and Institutional (I) City) and to rezone it from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District (County) and Low Density
Residential (LDR) (City) District to the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Institutional (I) zoning districts. The Planning
Department determined that the proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning applications are consistent with the following
standards specified in the Community Development Code:
. The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning applications are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area.
. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property.
. The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment.
Cover Memo
Item # 9
It should be noted, an updated traffic impact analysis was submitted to the City in February 2008. The updated traffic study was
required in order to confirm that Level of Service issues had not changed. City staff determined the Level of Service of the applicable
McMullen Booth Road segment will still be acceptable after the Spinecare site is developed.
The development agreement reviewed by the Community Development Board will be scheduled for Council action when the land use
plan amendment and rezoning are heard on second reading. The development agreement proposes to restrict the use of the site, the
floor area of the medical office, the location of parking and retention, specifies buffering, etc. and will be presented for discussion only
at the March 17,2008 City Council Work Session and the March 20, 2008 City Council meetings.
Please refer to the land use plan amendment and rezoning staff report (LUZ2005-02002) for the complete analysis. In accordance with
the Countywide Plan Rules, the future land use plan amendment is subject to the approval of the Pinellas Planning Council and the
Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Review and approval by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs is required.
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 9
CDB Date:
Case Number:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
Agenda Item:
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 5
May 17,2005
ANX2005-02003 (Related to DV A2005-0000l,
LUZ2005-02002 and FLD2005-0l0l4)
Spinecare Properties, LLC
Todd Pressman and Steve Seibert
3290 McMullen Booth Road
G-4 (Related to F-5, G-5 and G-6)
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
REQUEST:
SITE INFORMATION
PROPERTY SIZE:
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Annexation of 0.358-acres to the City of Clearwater to be
included as part of a pending land use and zoning case
(LUZ2005-02002).
0.358 acres
(124 feet wide by 124 feet deep)
Detached dwelling and accessory uses
Medical Office
PLAN CATEGORY:
Current Category:
Proposed Category:
ZONING DISTRICT:
Current District:
Proposed District:
ADJACENT USES:
Residential Suburban (RS) Classification (County)
Institutional (I) (City) (pending LUZ2005-02002)
A-E, Agricultural Estate (County)
Institutional (I) (City) (pending LUZ2005-02002)
North: Detached dwellings
South: Nursing home
East: Medical clinic
West: Detached dwellings
Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 17, 2005 - Case ANX2005-02003
Item # 9
Page 1
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 5
ANAL YSIS:
This annexation involves 0.358 acres property, located on the west side of McMullen Booth
Road approximately 500 feet north of Mease Road. The property is contiguous with the existing
City boundaries to the north, south and west; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent
with Pinellas County requirements with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is
requesting this annexation so the property can be included as part of a medical office
redevelopment project that includes the adjacent parcel to the west.
A companion application to amend the Future Land Use Plan category of the site from
Residential Suburban (RS) to Institutional (I), and to rezone it from Agricultural Estate (A-E)
(County) to the Institutional (I) District is being processed concurrently with this annexation
request in LUZ2005-02002 (see agenda item G-5).
I. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES:
Recommended Findings of Fact
Water and Sewer
The applicant receives water service from Pinellas County. Sanitary sewer service will be
provided by the City of Clearwater and the City has adequate capacity to serve this property.
The closest sanitary sewer line is located in the adjacent parcel to the west. The applicant is
aware of the costs to extend service to this site, as well as the applicable impact fees and utility
deposits that must be paid at the time building permits are issued
Solid Waste
Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal
agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's
Resource Recovery Plant and capacity is available to serve the property.
Police
The property is located within the East Police District and service will be administered through
the District 3 Substation located at 2851 McMullen Booth Road and County Road 580. There
are currently 56 patrol officers and seven patrol sergeants assigned to this district. Community
policing service will be provided through the City's zone system and officers in the field. The
Police Department has stated that it will be able to serve this property and the annexation will not
adversely affect police service and response time.
Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to this property by Station #50 located at
2681 Countryside Boulevard. The Fire Department will be able to serve this property and the
annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time.
Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 17, 2005 - Case ANX2005-02003
Item # 9
Page 2
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 5
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The City has adequate capacity to serve this property with sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire
and EMS service. The proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public facilities
and their levels of service.
II. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: [Section 4-604.F.2]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The proposed annexation is consistent with promoting the following goal and objective of the
City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan:
2.4 Objective - Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted
through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code.
3.0 Goal - A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to
accommodate public demand and promote infill development.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The property proposed for annexation is located within an enclave within the City's urban service
area. The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
III. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS: [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-604.F.5.]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The site is currently zoned A-E, Agricultural Estate District in the County. The applicant
proposes to rezone the property to the Institutional District. The proposed rezoning is being
processed concurrently with the annexation and is thoroughly analyzed and discussed in the staff
report for LUZ2005-02002 (see agenda item G-5).
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The appropriate zoning of the subject property is to be determined as part of LUZ2005-02002.
IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN:
Recommended Findings of Fact
A change is requested to the Countywide Comprehensive Plan category of this site from the
Residential Suburban (RS) category to the Institutional (I) category in LUZ2005-02002 (see
agenda item G-5). The proposed land use plan amendment is being processed concurrently with
the annexation and is more thoroughly analyzed and discussed in the staff report for LUZ2005-
02002 (see agenda item G-5).
Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 17, 2005 - Case ANX2005-02003
Item # 9
Page 3
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 5
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the future land use plan amendment is subject to
the approval of the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) and the Board of County Commissioners
acting as the Countywide Planning Authority.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The appropriate plan category of the property is to be determined as part of LUZ2005-02002.
V. CONSISTENCY WITH PINELLAS COUNTY LAW:
Recommended Findings of Fact
Pursuant to Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63, the Pinellas Planning Council staff has
reviewed this annexation and determined it complies with all applicable ordinance criteria.
Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63(1)(a) requires that a proposed annexation be both
contiguous to the existing municipal boundaries and compact. This site is contiguous with the
existing City boundaries to the north, south and east and represents a logical and appropriate
extension of the existing boundaries. The compactness standard requires that the annexation not
create an enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The property proposed for annexation is contiguous to city boundaries and is compact in its
concentration; therefore the annexation of this property is consistent with Pinellas County
Ordinance No. 00-63.
VI. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no current code enforcement violations or any code enforcement history on this site.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including sanitary sewer,
solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service
level. The property already receives City water service. The proposed annexation is consistent
with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Pinellas County Ordinance No.
00-63 regarding municipal annexation.
Based on the recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Planning Department
recommends APPROVAL of the annexation of 0.358-acres to the City of Clearwater.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner
Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 17, 2005 - Case ANX2005-02003
Item # 9
Page 4
Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 5
Attachments:
Application
Location Map
Aerial Photograph
Proposed Annexation
Surrounding Uses Map
Site Photographs
S:\Planning Department\C D /J\Annexations\ANX - 2005\ANX2005-02003 3280 McMullen Booth SpineL'are
Properties\4NX2005-02003 staff report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 17, 2005 - Case ANX2005-02003
Item # 9
Page 5
CDB Date:
Case Number:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
Agenda Item:
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 11
May 17,2005
LUZ2005-02002 (Related to ANX2005-02003, DV A2005-0000l,
and FLD2005-01014)
Spinecare Properties, LLC
Todd Pressman and Steve Seibert
3280/3290 McMullen Booth Road
G-5 (Related to F-5, G-4 and G-6)
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
REQUEST:
SITE INFORMATION
PROPERTY SIZE:
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
(a) Future Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential
Suburban (RS) Classification (County and City) to the
Residential Low (RL) Classification (City) (pending
ANX2005-02003);
(b) Future Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential
Suburban (RS) Classification (County) to the
Institutional (INS) Classification (City) (pending
ANX2005-02003);
(c) Rezoning from the Low Density Residential (LDR)
District (City of Clearwater) to the Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) District (City of
Clearwater); and
(d) Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate (County) to
the Institutional (I) District (City of Clearwater)
(pending ANX2005-02003).
196,272 square feet or 4.50 acres
(220 feet wide by 8500 feet deep m.o.l.)
14 attached dwellings and one vacant detached dwelling
and accessory strnctures
Medical Clinic
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
p~#9
Attachment number 2
Page 2 of 11
PLAN CATEGORY:
Current Category:
Proposed Category:
Residential Suburban (RS) Classification (City and County)
Residential Low (RL) and Institutional (INS) (City)
ZONING DISTRICT:
Current District:
Proposed District:
Low Density Residential (LDR) District (City) and A-E,
Agricultural Estate (County)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) (City) and
Institutional (I) (City)
EXISTING
SURROUNDING USES:
North: Detached dwellings
South: Assisted living facility and detached dwellings
East: Medical clinic
West: Detached dwellings
ANAL YSIS:
This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves two parcels of
land, approximately 4.50 acres in area located on the west side of McMullen Booth Road
approximately 500 feet north of Mease Road. A vacant detached dwelling and accessory
strnctures and 14 attached dwellings within two, one-story buildings currently occupy the site.
Both parcels have a FLUP designation of Residential Suburban (RS). The northeast corner of the
site, consisting of 0.358 acres, is included in a companion application to annex into the City of
Clearwater (see ANX2005-02003) and is zoned A-E, Agricultural Estate District (Pinellas
County). The remainder of the site consists of 4.142 acres and is located within the City and has
a zoning designation of Low Density Residential (LDR).
The applicant is requesting to amend the FLUP designation of the western 2.06 acres of this 4.5
acre site to the Residential Low (RL) classification and to rezone it to the Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District. The applicant is also requesting to amend the FLUP designation of
the eastern 2.44 acres of the site to the Institutional (INS) classification and to rezone it to the
Institutional (I) District. The applicant plans to construct a medical clinic with paved, surfaced
parking areas, landscaping and stormwater facilities (see FLD2005-0l0l4). A development
agreement is being proposed between the applicant and the City for a period of 10 years that
limits the use of the site to a 45,000 square foot medical clinic, while the land use plan
amendment and rezoning could possibly result in a maximum building size of 69,086 square feet.
Furthermore, the proposed agreement would limit the use of the residentially zoned portion of the
site to non-residential off-street parking (see DV A2005-0000l).
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the FLUP amendment is subject to approval by
the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide
Planning Authority. Based on the acreage and density involved in this plan amendment, review
and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is not required.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
lte~ if. 9
Attachment number 2
Page 3 of 11
I. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN [Section 4-603.F.l]
Recommended Findings of Fact
Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan in support
of the proposed land use plan amendment are as indicated below:
2.1 Objective -The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned
development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill
development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment.
2.2.1 Policy - On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan
approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned
developments that are compatible.
3.0 Goal - A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to
accommodate public demand and promote infill development.
5.1.1 Policy - No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level
of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment,
garbage collection, and drainage) to fall below minimum acceptable levels. However,
development orders may be phased or otherwise modified consistent with provisions of
the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with
the impacts of development.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The proposed plan amendment will result in land designated for institutional use along
McMullen Booth Road in close proximity to Mease Hospital. Additionally it will enable infill
development to occur without degrading the level of service of any public facility. The future
land use plan amendment and rezoning, along with the proposed Development Agreement (see
DV A 2005-00001) will limit the maximum development potential of the site to ensure that
development is compatible with the surrounding residential and institutional uses. The proposed
future land use plan amendment is not in conflict with any Clearwater Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN
Recommended Findings of Fact
The purpose of the proposed Institutional (INS) Future Land Use Plan category, as specified by
Section 2.3.3.7.3 of the Countywide Rules, is to depict those areas of the County that are now
used, or appropriate to be used, for public/semi-public institutional purposes; and to recognize
such areas consistent with the need, character and scale of the institutional use relative to
surrounding uses, transportation facilities, and natural resource features. The primary uses
permitted within the INS category are Public Educational Facilities; Private Schools; Colleges;
Hospital, Medical Clinic; Church, Religious Institution, Cemetery; Funeral Home/Mortuary;
Social/Public Service Agency; Child Day Care; Fraternal, Civic Organization; Municipal Office
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
lte~ 1f. 9
Attachment number 2
Page 4 of 11
Building, Courthouse; Library; Public Safety Facility, Emergency Medical Service Building; and
Convention Center. The secondary uses permitted with in this category are Residential Uses of
up to a maximum of 12.5 dwelling units per acre; Residential Equivalent uses at a ratio of 3 beds
per 1 permitted dwelling unit; Recreation/Open Space; Transportation/ Utility; and Ancillary
Non - Residential.
The purpose of the proposed Residential Low (RL) category, as specified in Section 2.3.3.1.4 of
the Countywide Rules, is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or
appropriate to be developed, in a low density residential manner; and to recognize such areas as
primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the low density, non-intensive
qualities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The Residential Low (RL) category is
generally appropriate to locations outside urban activity centers; in areas where use and
development characteristics are low density residential in nature; and in areas serving as a
transition between more suburban and more urban residential areas. Residential uses are the
primary uses in this plan category up to a maximum of five (5) dwelling units per acre.
Secondary uses permitted in the RL classification include Residential Equivalent uses permitted
at a ratio of three beds to one permitted units, Institutional, Transportation/Utility, Public
Educational Facility, Ancillary Non-Residential, and Recreation/Open Space uses.
As stated earlier, the 2.44-acre portion of the site fronting McMullen Booth Road is proposed to
be designated INS and the remaining 2.06 acres is proposed as RL. The FLUP Map pattern along
the west side of McMullen Booth Road in the vicinity of the subject site is institutional to the
south of the site and residential to the north and west. There is a consistent pattern of INS
designated land use fronting on McMullen Booth Road with residential land uses (Residential
Suburban and Residential Urban) abutting to the west. Furthermore, the general land pattern is
that larger tracts (mostly un-platted parcels that front on McMullen Booth Road) have access on
McMullen Booth Road. The land designated for residential purposes has generally been platted
and does not have access onto McMullen Booth Road. The compatibility of institutional and
residential land uses is evidenced by existing land use patterns and by the fact that the
Countywide Rules allow residential uses in the INS classification and institutional uses in all
residential land use classifications.
McMullen Booth Road in the vicinity of the subject site is designated as a Primary Corridor of
the Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor (SNCC). It also has a Residential classification on the
SNCC Map. Section 4.2.7.1.4 of the Countywide Rules indicate that public/semi-public future
land use plan classifications (which includes the INS category) may be appropriate within the
Residential Corridor based on the character, intensity and scale of the uses permitted in relation
to the existing delineation of plan categories, adjoining existing uses, and the need for such uses.
Based on the existing development patterns in the vicinity of the subject site and the site's close
proximity to Mease Hospital, the proposed INS and RL designations are consistent with the
SNNC Residential designation.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
lte~;# 9
Attachment number 2
Page 5 of 11
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The proposed locations of the INS and RL future land use plan categories are consistent with the
purpose and locational characteristics of the Countywide Plan. Additionally the proposed
categories are consistent with the Residential Classification of the Primary Corridor of the
Scenic/Non -Commercial Corridor.
III. COMPA TIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY/CHARACTER OF THE
CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD [Sections 4-602.F.2 & 4-603.F.3]
Recommended Findings of Fact
In the vicinity of the subject site, McMullen Booth Road is a six-lane divided arterial roadway
that is controlled by traffic signals at SR 580, Mease Drive and Curlew Road. McMullen Booth
Road is characterized by a variety of institutional uses including an assisted living facility, a
hospital, medical clinics, a nursing home, and educational facilities, as well as offices, single-
family and multi-family residential, open space and utility uses. Primarily single-family
dwellings characterize the immediate area to the southwest, northwest and west of the subject
site and an assisted living facility is located adjacent to the south of the site.
Land located on the west side of McMullen Booth Road between the subject site south to SR 580
is designated Institutional (INS) on the FLUP Map with the exception of some Preservation (P)
designated land at the Chi Chi Rodriguez Golf Course and one small parcel designated
Residential/Office Limited. The area to the north and west is developed with single-family
platted subdivisions designated Residential Suburban (RS) and Residential Urban (RU).
The remainder of FLUP designations on the east and west side of McMullen Booth Road are
Residential/Office Limited, Residential/Office/Retail, Residential/Office General, Preservation,
Recreation/Open Space, and Residential Estate.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The proposed FLUP amendment and rezoning is compatible with surrounding uses and
designations due to the similarity of land use patterns of institutional property adjacent to
residential property, the general institutional character of this area along McMullen Booth Road
and the site's close proximity to Mease Hospital. The proposed FLUP and zoning atlas
amendments are compatible with surrounding properties and the character of the City and
neighborhood.
IV. SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
Recommended Findings of Fact
As stated earlier, the overall subject site is approximately 4.50 acres in area and is presently
occupied by 14 attached dwellings within two buildings and a vacant detached dwelling. The
applicant is requesting to amend the FLUP designation of the western 2.06 acres of the site to the
Residential Low (RL) classification and to rezone it to the Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR) District. The applicant is also requesting to amend the FLUP designation of the eastern
2.44 acres of the site to the Institutional (INS) classification and to rezone it to the Institutional
(I) District. Based on a maximum permitted density of 2.5 units per acre in the Residential
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
lte~ 11- 9
Attachment number 2
Page 6 of 11
Suburban (RS) category, 5 dwelling units could be constructed on this portion of the site. The
allowable development potential in the Residential Low (RL) category is five units per acre,
which would allow 10 dwelling units to be constructed on the western 2.06 acres of this site. The
allowable development potential in the Institutional (INS) category is 12.5 dwelling units per
acre or a floor area ratio of 0.65, which would allow 30 dwellings units or 69,086 square feet of
gross floor area to be constructed on the eastern 2.44 acres of the site.
Roadways
The accepted methodology for reviewing the transportation impacts of proposed plan
amendments is based on the Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation guidelines.
The PPC's traffic generation rates have been calculated for the subject site based on the existing
and proposed FLUP categories and are included in the next tables. The first table examines the
maximum potential traffic of the FLUP amendment from the Residential Suburban (RS) to the
Residential Low (RL) classification. The second table examines the maximum potential traffic
of the FLUP amendment from the Residential Suburban (RS) to the Institutional (INS)
classification.
Maximum Daily Added Potential Trips N/A 58 105 47
Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Trips 3 N/A 5 10 5
Volume of McMullen Booth Road from Curlew Road to 55,697 55,755 55,802 47
S.R.580
LOS of McMullen Booth Road from Curlew Road to S.R. A A A A
580
N/A = Not Applicable LOS = Level-of-Service
I = Based on PPC calculations of trips per acre per day for the Residential Suburban Future Land Use Category.
on
per acre per
3 = Based on MPO K-factor of 0.095
Source: "The Rules" of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
lte~ ff. 9
Attachment number 2
Page 7 of 11
Maximum Daily Added Potential Trips N/A 68 407 339
Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Trips 3 N/A 6 39 33
Volume of McMullen Booth Road from Curlew Road to 55,697 55,765 56,104 339
S.R.580
LOS of McMullen Booth Road from Curlew Road to S.R. A A A A
580
N/A = Not Applicable LOS = Level-of-Service
I = Based on PPC calculations of trips per acre per day for the Residential Suburban Future Land Use Category.
2 = Based on PPC calculations of trips per acre per day for the Institutional Future Land Use Category.
3 = Based on MPO 0.095
Source: "The Rules" of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan
Based on the 2003 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service
Report, the segment of McMullen Booth Road from Curlew Road to S.R. 580 has a LOS of A.
Although the proposed FLUP categories of Residential Low (RL) and Institutional (INS) could
generate an increase in PM Peak Hour traffic on this segment of McMullen Booth Road by a
total of 38 trips; however, this increase in trips would be an increase of less than one percent and
will not result in the degradation of the existing LOS to the surrounding road network. An
accompanying development agreement (see DV A2004-00003) will limit the use of the site so it
is likely that the projected traffic volumes will be even less than indicated above.
Specific uses in the current and proposed zoning districts have also been analyzed for the level of
vehicle trips that could be generated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Manual.
Existing Zoning(LMDR/A-E)/Future Land Use Plan (RS)
Single- family residential
5
48
N/A
5
N/A
dwelling units
Proposed Zoning(LMDR) /Future Land Use Plan (RL)
Single- family residential
10
96
48
10
5
dwelling units
Apartments (6.63
10
66
18
7
2
dwelling units
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
lte~ '# 9
Attachment number 2
Page 8 of 11
Existing Zoning(LMDR/A-E)/Future Land Use Plan (RS)
S ingle- family residential 5
48 N/A 5 N/A
dwelling units
Proposed Zoning(I) /Future Land Use Plan (INS)
Nursing Home (2.61 91
238 190 33 28
dwelling units
Place of Worship (9.11 69,086
629 582 97 92
dwelling units
Medical Clinic (31.45 69,086
2,173 2,125 368 363
dwelling units
The City of Clearwater Engineering Department has concluded that the transportation impacts
associated with this land use plan amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing
LOS to the surrounding road network, as the traffic generation associated with the proposed
amendment will not exceed one percent of the existing PM Peak hour trips of McMullen Booth
Road. In addition, no impact to the operational efficiency of the signalized intersections within
the subject area is anticipated by the proposed amendment.
Mass Transit
The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The
total miles of fixed route service will not change; the subject site is located along an existing
transit route and headways are less than or equal to one hour. Pinellas Suncoast Transit
Authority (PSTA) bus service is available along North McMullen Booth Road.
Water
The current FLUP category could use up to 2,750 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP
categories, water demand could approach approximately 9,409 gallons per day. As a portion of
the property will be limited to parking, it is likely that the increase will be less than projected.
The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for water
Wastewater
The current FLUP category could produce up to 2,200 gallons per day. Under the proposed
FLUP categories, sewer demand could approach approximately 7,530 gallons per day. As a
portion of the property will be limited to parking, it is likely that the increase will be less than
projected. The proposed land use amendment will not negatively affect the City's current LOS
for wastewater.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
lte~ if. 9
Attachment number 2
Page 9 of 11
Solid Waste
The current Residential Suburban FLUP category would result in the production of 28 tons of
solid waste per year. Under the proposed FLUP categories, the maximum development of 10
dwelling units could generate 25 tons of solid waste per year. The proposed medical office with
ancillary non-residential off-street parking lot could generate 160 tons of solid waste per year.
The proposed land use and plan amendment will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for
solid waste disposal.
Recreation and Open Space
The proposed future land use plan and zoning designations will permit the development of up to
11 dwelling units and 69,086 square feet of gross floor area; however, as the use of the site is
proposed to be limited to a medical office with ancillary non-residential off-street parking for the
next ten years via a development agreement (case# DV A2005-00001), payment of an Open
Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fee will not be required at this time.
Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees will be required if the property
is ever developed with residential uses. The amount and timing of this fee is dependent on the
number of developed units and will be addressed and paid during the site plan review process.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
Based on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant and reviewed by the
Clearwater Engineering Department, the proposed FLUP amendment and rezoning will result in
an increase in traffic volumes, however, the level of service of this segment of McMullen Booth
Road will not be degraded. It has also been determined that the amendment and rezoning will
not negatively affect the City's current level of service for water, wastewater, solid waste
disposal or mass transit. Based on the findings above, the proposed FLUP and rezoning does not
require nor affect the provision of public services in a negative manner.
V. IMPACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT [Section 4-603.F.5.]
Recommended Findings of Fact
No jurisdictional wetlands are located on the subject site; however, the site has significant
vegetation. A provision of the proposed development agreement (see DV A2005-00001) will
require that 70% of existing trees with a diameter greater than 12 inches be preserved. Prior to
development of the subject property, site plan approval will be required. A site plan has been
submitted concurrent with this application (case FLD2005-01014) which includes a stormwater
management system that meets all City and Southwest Florida Water Management District
(SWFWMD) stormwater management criteria. Water quantity and quality will be controlled in
compliance with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The site has significant trees on the site but no wetlands. The natural environment of the site will
be protected through the City's tree preservation and stormwater management requirements, as
well as provisions of a proposed Development Agreement (see DV A2005-00001). The proposed
FLUP amendment and rezoning will not result in adverse impacts on the natural environment.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
lte~cjf. 9
Attachment number 2
Page 10 of 11
VI. LOCATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES [Section 4-602 .F.6.]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
The location of the proposed Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and
Institutional (I) boundaries are logical based on surrounding FLUP patterns along the west side of
the McMullen Booth Road corridor. It will blend into the existing Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District to the north and the Low Density Residential (LDR) District to the
south and west. The location of the I District boundaries is also consistent with the HF, Hospital
Facility District (City of Safety Harbor) to the immediate south.
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
The proposed zoning district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and
classifications of streets, ownership lines, development patterns and the natural environment.
VII. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-602.F.1. and .2.]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
The existing FLUP category and zoning districts permit a density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre
and an impervious surface ratio (ISR) of 0.60. The proposed RL future land use category and
LMDR District and INS land use and I District are more intensive. The LMDR District permits a
density of five dwelling units and an ISR of .60. The I District permits 12.5 dwelling units per
acre and an ISR of 0.65. Under the current LMDR zoning district provisions, a minimum lot
width of 50 feet and a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet are required. Under the current I
zoning district provisions, a minimum lot width of 100 feet and a minimum lot area of 20,000
square feet are required. The subject site is approximately 196,272 square feet in lot area and
220 feet in lot width.
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
The proposed use of this property as a medical clinic with ancillary non-residential off-street
parking is consistent with the uses allowed as part of a Level Two Flexible Development use in
the Institutional (I) and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning districts, respectively.
Non-residential off-street parking facilities do not have a minimum lot area or width requirement
in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District. The subject property exceeds the
City's minimum LMDR and I District's dimensional requirements and is therefore consistent
with the Community Development Code.
Approval of this land use plan amendment and zoning district designation does not
guarantee the right to develop on the subject property. Transportation concurrency must be
met, and the property owner will have to comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the
time development permits are requested.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
ltQlll# 9
Attachment number 2
Page 11 of 11
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An amendment of the FLUP Map from the Residential Suburban (RS) category to the Residential
Low (RL) and Institutional (INS) categories and a rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate
District (County) and the Low Density Residential (LDR) District (City) to the Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) and Institutional (I) Districts is requested. The proposed
designations meet the purpose and locational requirements of the Countywide Plan; the use of the
property is consistent with the proposed designations; the property exceeds the minimum
dimensional requirements of the Community Development Code and is consistent with the
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Based on the recommended findings of fact and recommended
conclusions of law, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the request:
a) Recommend APPROVAL of the Future Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential
Suburban (RS) Classification (County and City) to the Residential Low (RL) Classification
(City) (pending ANX2005-02003);
b) Recommend APPROVAL of the Future Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential
Suburban (RS) Classification (County) to the Institutional (INS) Classification (City)
(pending ANX2005-02003);
c) Recommend APPROVAL of the Rezoning from the Low Density Residential (LDR) District
(City of Clearwater) to the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District (City of
Clearwater); and
d) Recommend APPROVAL of the Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate (County) to the
Institutional (I) District (City of Clearwater) (pending ANX2005-02003).
Prepared by Planning Department staff:
Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner
Attachments:
Application
Location Map
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Land Use Plan Map
Zoning Map
Existing Surrounding Uses
Site Photographs
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\LUZ 2005\LUZ2005-02002 3280-3290 McMullen Booth Rd
Spinecare Properties\Final LUZ2005-02002 Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005 - Case LUZ2005-02002
ltQlll# 9
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 6
Location Map
Owners: Spinecare Properties. LLC Case: LUZ2005-02002
Site: 3280 & 3290 McMullen Booth Road Property Size(Acres): 4.51
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 21/28/16/00000/220/0100
From: RS (County) AE (County) & 21/28/16/30462/000/0010
LDR (City)
To: RL & INS LMDR & I Atlas Page: 190A
Item # 9
Attachment number 3
Page 2 of 6
Aerial Photograph
Owners: Spinecare Properties. LLC Case: LUZ2005-02002
Site: 3280 & 3290 McMullen Booth Road Property Size(Acres): 4.51
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 21/28/16/00000/220/0100
From: RS (County) AE (County) & 21/28/16/30462/000/0010
LDR (City)
To: RL & INS LMDR & I Atlas Page: 190A
Item # 9
Attachment number 3
Page 3 of 6
'"
a
'"
'"
22
'"
'"
'"
CO)
a
'"
"-
CO)
a
'"
CO)
co
a
'"
R
a
'"
HAMPTON CT
RS
a
CO)
a
'"
(;j
a
'"
12
a
'"
DOXBERRY CT
:0
a
'"
'"
co
a
'"
"-
"-
a
'"
RL
INS
Future Land Use Plan Map
Owners: Spinecare Properties. LLC Case: L UZ2005-02002
Site: 3280 & 3290 McMullen Booth Road Property Size(Acres): 4.51
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 21/28/16/00000/220/0100
From: RS (County) AE (County) & 21/28/16/30462/000/0010
LDR (City)
To: RL & INS LMDR & I Atlas Page: 190A
Item # 9
Attachment number 3
Page 4 of 6
r--,
I L_~
I I
I I
I I
I__r~-"
a
'"
--,
1 Ij--L
I I
I I
I_J-~--I
a
'"
I-l
I I
r--- I
I I
I I
L.r-",-~_I
a
'"
(--'1
_J I
I
I
- I
U ~I.,.I
'8-J
'"
II
I L__-.
I I
I I
I I
I rJ"-
,-"
"-
I~r--I
I '" I
I I
-, I
" I
'L.._J
CO)
_~_r--I
I '" I
I I
1- I
" I
'L_J
R
~--,_r~-l ...-__-, ....,
I II ~
I I I '"I
L" I 1 J
" I I I
'1__1 I .....--
L_I
HAMPTON CT
1--1---,
I I
I I
S5 II s--frl
g L_J g
r--1 r--'
/J I // I
.....J' 11./ I
: a I I f?1
L---'_gJ L,-_._~
DOXBERRY CT
CO)
g .-_-, 0\ :;
I-~"" I -'r-r-l1l-~.....r-iB
I I r I I
L" I I I :
, I -- I ---, I
l__i I__J I_J
"-
;;
-:-'J-j
I
I"
I I
L__I
- ~ "-
--~~ I__J-~ r-.--.....-t5-1 Lr) 01
I [\') I I [\')11 [\')1 r--1.-,B I-CQl--,r-,
I II rll r- I C'<7o I a I
L_, : 1_ Iii Ii '" 1
'1_ I '--, I I I 1 ....._...J 1 r-...J
- - I--~ l__J I J L./
LMDR
rr-----------------I
I I
~ I
1--1 L-!!1!!!._I-l_...J-~_r-L_J--...J
I I m I
I "
I I
I -
I_J
------l
I
r--...J
I
I -~
I I
L____...J
I-I
l__J
---,
-c.lDR
I-~
I
I
I
L
I
rl
r-"
I
Cj268
r I
I I
li .........................J
3t6J1_J
1---1
I \
I r
3261... J~
325,----'__~
I.J.... r-L_J
I I
Ll___1
---,
L,
I
I-
I
___J
(-"'-----""3~62
-I r--~
I I
L___J
--I
I
I
I
__J
C-=--=--=-~---_-=-~56
I I
----~ I
L.. I
I-~
I
I
I
.....
1 0..
:J-- ~
I 3250 0
-
:c:
1..:-------1
321tp r J
I I................
L .J
GEIGER CT
I-I
L J
! L---Tll
I I
I '
I I
L-l______J
Zoning Map
Owners:
Spinecare Properties. LLC
Case:
LUZ2005-02002
Site: 3280 & 3290 McMullen Booth Road
Land Use Zoning
From: RS (County) AE (County) &
LDR (City)
To: RL & INS LMDR & I
Property Size(Acres):
4.51
PIN:
21/28/16/00000/220/0100
21/28/16/30462/000/0010
Atlas Page:
190A
Item # 9
Attachment number 3
Page 5 of 6
HAMPTON CT
"-
I~r--I
I '" I
I I
-, I
" I
'L.._J
CO)
_~_r--I
I '" I
I I
1- I
" I
'L_J
R
~--,_r~-l ...-__-, ....,
I II ~
I I I '"I
L" I 1 J
" I I I
'1__1 I .....--
,-_I
1--1___,
I I
I I
S5 II s-fri
g L_J g
r--1 r--'
/J I /1 I
.....J' 11./ I
: a I I f?1
L_--._gJ L,-_._~
I_l-~I
, '"I
I
I
" I
'I__J
'"
-LJ~
'"I
.:-
I
--l_J
------l
I
r---'
I
I -~
I I
'------'
I-I
l__J
rr-----------------I
I I
~ I
1--1 L--'-_I-l_...J-~_r-L_J--....I
I I
I L,
I I
I -
I :
l__-,
---,
I
-""",--_J
I-~
I
I
I
L
(-"'-----""3~62
-I ,---
I I
L___J
---,
L,
I
I-
I
___J
r--,
I L_~
I I
I I
I I
:__r~-'
a
'"
--,
: Ij--L
I I
I I
I_J-~--I
a
'"
I-l
I I
r--- I
I I
I I
L.r-",-~_I
a
'"
I ~
I
r;-- ~
I' ....
I 3250 (.)
(-~l SE
_J I
I
I
- I
U -1",1
'8-J
'"
1..:-------1
321tp r J
I (/'
L .J
GEIGER CT
Medical
I c______~
offices III
I '
I I
c-l______J
Existing Surrounding Uses
Owners: Spinecare Properties. LLC Case: LUZ2005-02002
Site: 3280 & 3290 McMullen Booth Road Property Size(Acres): 4.51
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 21/28/16/00000/220/0100
From: RS (County) AE (County) & 21/28/16/30462/000/0010
LDR (City)
To: RL & INS LMDR & I Atlas Page: 190A
Item # 9
Existing structure on 3290 McMullen Booth Rd
Property to the south
Property to the east
Attachment number 3
Page 6 of 6
Existing structures on 3280McMullen Booth Rd
Property to the north
Spinecare Properties, LLC
LUZ2005-02002
3280 & 3290 McMullen Booth Road
Item # 9
Attachment number 4
Page 1 of 7
Location Map
Owner:
Spinecare Properties. LLC
Case:
ANX2005-02003
Site:
3290 McMullen Booth Road
Property Size (Acres):
0.35
Land Use
Zoning
From:
RS (County)
AE (County)
To:
INS
Atlas Page:
PIN:
21/28/16/00000/220/0100
190A
Item # 9
Attachment number 4
Page 2 of 7
Aerial Photograph
Owner:
Spinecare Properties. LLC
Case:
ANX2005-02003
Site:
3290 McMullen Booth Road
Property Size (Acres):
0.35
Land Use
Zoning
PIN:
21/28/16/00000/220/0100
From:
RS (County)
AE (County)
To:
INS
Atlas Page:
190A
Item # 9
-~
I
I
I
I
_J
I
I
I
I
I
3263
321L---,__~
.J-' r-"" I
I I L_"
I I
Ll___1
11251-----1
L I
I c"
'I (,,-
L .J
II
I L~__
I I
I I
I rigJ
l_...J ~
Owner:
Site:
From:
To:
r-------I
L, .......J
I //
l32tillJ
Attachment number 4
Page 3 of 7
HAMPTON CT
"-
,--r-'i5
I 9"
I I
-, I
, I
'-L_J
L() r-- ~
I-~- I r-~_r~-l .--__.., q;
I"" II II -~
l_, I L..... I 1 I
, I , I I i
l_J 'l_-.J l__I--
1--1__-1
I I
:ill i;J
~ L_...!s~~
r--1 r--1
/J I /1 1
./ I r./ I
I ",I I ~I
I r::;1 ~ gl
L_-...,_.~:d '--l.__J
DOXBERRY CT
,...r-----------------I
I I
~ I
1--1 L--'-_I-l_...J-~_r-L_J--....I
I I
I "
I I
I -
I I
l__-,
1
1-
\
{
I
r~
~,
/, ...-/ "-
/ ~ /
> /
( /
, /
" /
'~,,/ //'\
~~ / "-
") ( >
J (
/ "
, ,
3"([4'11',./
I-I
L r
I L_______
, I
I '"
I "J
I I
L-l______J
Proposed Annexation Map
Spinecare Properties. LLC
Case:
ANX2005-02003
3290 McMullen Booth Road
Property Size (Acres):
0.35
Land Use
Zoning
PIN:
21/28/16/00000/220/0100
RS (County)
AE (County)
INS
Atlas Page:
190A
Item # 9
I
I
_J
I
J
1-" I
I ~I
I r-.J
L ~268
----Jf'62
,---
I
__J
------,
_, ~_~56
I I
" I
I
_S----I
: ,--I
I J
: : 3250
l (--"1
I _J I
I I
I I
I U--I;;::
-.J Lo..J
<'l
Owners:
Site:
From:
To:
Attachment number 4
Page 4 of 7
-u--i __--=--~ ,__J--ill ,-----~ '" "'-
,T I'l'l ~ I ~ r--1.-,2 IOj ~-""r'"
,J I II r I ..... I "" I~ I
I l_ II I I I -, 1-,
--I 1 " I -'--, I -I : I .-_J 1
__J L_J I__J 1__J : J :
-- L
,...r-----------------I
I I
~ I
1--1 L--L_J-l_--'-~_r-L_.J----'
: I, GEIGER
I I
: I
L__J
r I
I I
L, "
~2Bil~S
I
I
I
I
I
3263
32iL---1
J--' r-""--i
I I L__
I I
LL___I
,
(
I
r
,g251-----1
, I
I r"
'I (..-
, ..J
II
I L~__
I I
I I
: r~-1
L_-, ~
~,
/,--...-1 ">
, I
I I
" I
" I
'1:"/ //'",-
';)t>c / "
") ( ,
I-I
L J
I L______~
, I
: '"
Future Land Use Map
McMullen Booth Developers. LLC
Case:
ANX2005-02003
3290 McMullen Booth Road
Property Size (Acres):
0.35
Land Use
Zoning
PIN:
21/28/16/00000/220/0100
RS (County)
AE (County)
INS
Atlas Page:
190A
Item # 9
I
I
_J
I
J
"
!;:: iIJ-I-1
~ - __~ I I
,;;1 -'J I L-., I
,,,,, I" I
I L__ I-J 'L_J
I I I
I 1__'
J
,-" I
I ~I
I r-.J
L ~268
----Jf'62
,---
1
__J
------,
_, ~_~56
I I
" I
1
_S----,
: ,--I
I J
: : 3250
l (--"1
I _J I
1 I
I I
I U--';;::
-.J Lo..J
'"
Attachment number 4
Page 5 of 7
_ L()_r-_ r~- .....
I 8 I __- '" I _--, '"
I'" :1 :: ~
l_, I L..... I I I
" I "" I I !
l_J 1__1 1__1--
r--l r--'
D J I I I
/ 1.// I
tJ all ~l
s'-"o I 8;: L gl
1 C'? L_-c-~.J "'--""I.__.J
DOXBERRY CT
-u--i __--=--~ ,__J--ill ,-----~ '" "'-
,T I'l'l ~ I ~ r--1.-,2 IOj ~-""r'"
,J I II r I ..... I "" I~ I
I l_ II I I I -, 1-,
--I 1 " I -'--, I -I : I .-_J 1
__J L_J I__J 1__J : J :
-- L
,...r-----------------I
I I
~ I
1--1 L--L_J-l_--'-~_r-L_.J----'
: I, GEIGER
1 I
: I
I__J
r I
I 1
II ........................1
32tillJ
32iL---,
J--' r-""--i
I I L__
I I
LL___I
,g251-----,
, I
I r"
'I (.......
, ..J
II
I L~__
I I
I I
: r~-'
L_-, ~
~,
/,--...-1 ">
, I
/ /
" /
" /
'1:"/ //'",-
';)t>c / "
") ( ,
I-'
L J
I L______~
, I
: ",
Zoning Map
Owners: McMullen Booth Developers, LLC Case: ANX2005-02003
Site: 3290 McMullen Booth Road Property Size (Acres): 0.35
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 21/28/00000/220/0100
From: RS (County) AE (County)
To: INS Atlas Page: 190A
Item # 9
Attachment number 4
Page 6 of 7
HAMPTON CT
L() r-- ~
1-i:S- I r-~_r~-l .--__.., &;
1 0) : : : : -i'!
l_, I L"",\ I 1 I
, 1 " 1 1 I
1-_J 'L_-.J l__I--
-~
1
1
1
1
_J
~r-----------------I
1 1
~ 1
1--1 L--,-_I-l_...J-~_r-L_J--....I
: l,
1
1 -
l_J residential
r-------:
l, .......J
1 //
32tillJ
1---1
: -)
1 1
326 J~
321z----'__~
1.]--' i-L_J
1 1
LL___I
II
I L~__
I I
1 1
: ri!:.J
l_-, g
--I
L J
I c_______
, 1
: \
1 _J
1 1
c_ 1
l_______
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner:
Spinecare Properties, LLC
Case:
ANX2005-02003
Site:
3290 McMullen Booth Road
Property Size (Acres):
0.35
Land Use
Zoning
PIN:
21/28/16/00000/220/0100
From:
RS (County)
AE (County)
To:
INS
Atlas Page:
190A
Item # 9
Existing structure on 3290 McMullen Booth Rd
Property to the south
Property to the east
Attachment number 4
Page 7 of 7
Existing structures on 3280McMullen Booth Rd
Property to the north
Spinecare Properties, LLC
ANX2005-02003
3280 & 3290 McMullen Booth Road
Item # 9
Attachment number 5
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7942-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 0.358-
ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF MEASE DRIVE,
CONSISTING OF METES AND BOUNDS 22/01, A PORTION OF
SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE
POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 3290 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD,
INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND
REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO
INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WH EREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the
City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
See legal description attached hereto
(ANX2005-02003)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby accepts the dedication
of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public, which have heretofore
been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk
and the Planning Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the
official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk
shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after
adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after
adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 9
Ordinance No. 7942-08
Attachment number 5
Page 2 of 2
Legal Description for ANX2005-02003
The East 308.25 feet of the North 'V4 of the Northwest 'V4 of the Northwest 'V4 of Section 21,
Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida. Less the South 208.75 feet and
less the West 84 feet, and Less the East 100 feet thereof for road right-of-way.
Item # 9
Ordinance No. 7942-08
Attachment number 6
Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 7943-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE
LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY
500 FEET NORTH OF MEASE DRIVE, CONSISTING OF METES
AND BOUNDS 22/01 IN A PORTION OF SECTION 21,
TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 3290 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, UPON
ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS
INSTITUTIONAL; AND CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 500
FEET NORTH OF MEASE DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 1,
GEIGER TRACT, A PORTION OF SECTON 21, TOWNSHIP 28
SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST; WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
3280 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, FROM RESIDENTIAL
SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL LOW AND INSTITUTIONAL;
PROVI 01 NG AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive
plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate,
and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of
Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described
property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
See legal description "A" attached hereto.
(LUZ2005-02002)
Land Use CateQorv
To: Institutional
Section 2. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of
Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described
property as follows:
Property
See legal description "B" attached hereto.
Land Use CateQorv
From: Residential Suburban
To: Residential Low and
Institutional
Section 3. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with
the City's comprehensive plan.
Ordinance No. 7943-08
Item # 9
Attachment number 6
Page 2 of 3
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7942-08.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7943-08
Item # 9
Attachment number 6
Page 3 of 3
Legal Description "A" for LUZ2005-02002
The East 308.25 feet of the North 'V4 of the Northwest 'V4 of the
Northwest 'V4 of Section 21, Township 28 South, Range 16 East,
Pinellas County, Florida. Less the South 208.75 feet and less the
West 84 feet, and Less the East 100 feet thereof for road right-of-
way.
Legal Description "B" for LUZ2005-02002
Lot 1, Geiger Tract, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book
102, Page 18, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Ordinance No. 7943-08
Item # 9
Attachment number 7
Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 7944-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH
OF MEASE DRIVE, CONSISTING OF METES AND BOUNDS
22/01, A PORTION OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH,
RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 3290
MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS INSTITUTIONAL (I); AND BY
REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD APPROXIMATELY 500
FEET NORTH OF MEASE DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 1,
GEIGER TRACT, A PORTION OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 28
SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
3280 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (LOR) TO LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(LMDR) AND INSTITUTIONAL(I); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is
found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive
plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby
zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is
amended, as follows:
Property
See legal description "A" attached hereto.
(LUZ2005-02002)
ZoninQ District
I nstitutional (I)
Section 2. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is hereby rezoned, and
the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
Property
See legal description "B" attached hereto.
(LUZ2005-02002)
ZoninQ District
From: Low Density Residential (LOR)
To: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
and I nstitutional (I)
Section 3. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance
with the foregoing amendment.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7942-08.
Ordinance No.l~#la3
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Approved as to form:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Attachment number 7
Page 2 of 3
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Ordinance No.ltem4#J19
Attachment number 7
Page 3 of 3
Legal Description "A" for Legal Description for ANX2005-02003
The East 308.25 feet of the North 'V4 of the Northwest 'V4 of the Northwest 'V4 of Section 21,
Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida. Less the South 208.75 feet and less
the West 84 feet, and Less the East 100 feet thereof for road right-of-way.
Legal Description "B" for LUZ2005-02002
Lot 1, Geiger Tract, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 102,
Page 18, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
3
Ordinance No.ltem4#J19
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Suburban (RS) and Initial Zoning Atlas Designation of Low
Density Residential (LDR) District for 2327 Nursery Road (a portion of Lot 19, Pinellas Groves, Section 19, Township 29 South, Range
16 East); and Pass Ordinances 7937-08, 7938-08 and 7939-08 on first reading. (ANX2008-02002)
SUMMARY:
This voluntary annexation petition involves a 0.446-acre property consisting of one vacant parcel of land. It is located on the south side
of Nursery Road approximately 250 feet east of Winchester Road. The applicant is requesting this annexation in order to receive solid
waste and sanitary sewer service from the City. The property is contiguous to existing City boundaries to the north, south and east. It is
proposed that the property be assigned a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Suburban (RS) and a zoning category of Low
Density Residential (LDR).
The need for sanitary sewer service was prompted by the applicant's proposal to construct a 3,057 square foot single-family home. Due
to timing issues, the applicant would like to construct the single-family home while located in the County; therefore the Planning
Department has worked with the applicant and Pinellas County to ensure that the site plan approved by the County complies with the
provisions of the Clearwater Community Development Code. Due to the nature of the construction, Pinellas County will require the
applicant to connect into the City's sanitary sewer system prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO). To ensure
consistency in the application of Building Code inspections and to prevent any construction liability issues, the project will be built in
its entirety under Pinellas County jurisdiction. For that reason, second reading of the annexation cannot occur until after the County
issues a CO, which is anticipated to be near the end of the year. The Planning Department will schedule second and final reading after
the applicant obtains the CO.
The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the provisions of Community Development Code
Section 4-604.E as follows:
. The closest sanitary sewer line is located in the adjacent Nursery Road right-of-way and the applicant is aware of the
requirement to pay the City's sewer impact and assessment fee and is aware of the additional costs to extend City sewer service
to the property. Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The property is located within Police
District III and service will be administered through the district headquarters located at 2851 North McMullen Booth Road. Fire
and emergency medical services will be provided to this property by Station 47 located at 1460 Lakeview Road. The City has
adequate capacity to serve this property with solid waste, police, fire and EMS service. The proposed annexation will not have an
adverse effect on public facilities and their levels of service;
. The proposed annexation is consistent with and promotes the following objective of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan:
Cover Memo
Objective 2.4: Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of thel@h'YWam
Community Development Code;
. The proposed Residential Suburban (RS) Future Land Use Plan category is consistent with the current Countywide Plan
designation of this property. This designation primarily permits single-family homes with a density of 2.5 dwelling units per
acre. The proposed zoning district to be assigned to the property is the Low Density Residential (LDR) District. The use of the
subject property is consistent with the uses allowed in the District and the property exceeds the District's minimum dimensional
requirements. The proposed annexation is therefore consistent with the Countywide Plan, City's Comprehensive Plan and
Community Development Code; and
. The property proposed for annexation is contiguous to existing City boundaries to the north, south and east; therefore the
annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes Chapter 171.044.
Review Approval: 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 10
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 7
.1 [1 f l ~-~.~~
.', ~'.-.'.:o:-~:~ t._:::.;
. .~~~:: .:.:.:.Y.~~.t ;:.:: ::".;
: ~.:~ ~~ ~.~ ;..:::.~:.~ ::.."::. :; ~.;.::~: i. ~t: ;..~ :~ :.~ I
.:::.........:................::::.1
:':::.::.:./::.~:~PR{.(PL!
::: :',:.:::-:::::::',.::'.:::;.:.::'i
:'.". "..:.:::.:::";":" :::'.
. . . . - . -. .
1111 I II 1111 I II 1111 I
r::r;,.:::~:.)::{::? :~.:,:.:-:;:,:..'::'::~:iii,\:::.::~:::? ),~,~'}..'::-:::i:~:i,::/.:::\::~ ::':':':;'1
:'..:.:.:.:.:.':....:-:::.:::..:'..:.:.:.:.i:!'-:...:-:::.::::-:''':':':':'''~:-:::'I
t::::':::~~&~+-:~:i~::i::::;~::::::'::::.::i~.~':;:~.::'~~:::::;::::::~.::i~.:::;:;~:'::'::::::i
1:::;:::..:.....:.::..-..:...:::::::;:::..:.....:.::.....:...:::::: :;:::..:...-':.::.'...:'.:
..;~ ...~:~...~~.~.:.....~. ~io.t (.:~..~.;.::.;.;= ;:,".;.~.;. ;:~: ~.-:::;::. /"(( (.:~..~.;.::.;.;: ;:.'t
..... '..-." ....-......... ......J
i;::':::':'j::'::~::"':l':::':'::i "'
r-.'.:::":-;..':.:.:::...:..:..::::..::::'=;.':::::',\::":-;,.':.:.:::,:J ~
!:::!:i::::;i!'!f2.~:~~~[j'f:;;!~
LD~:'~ PRf/r~CT
l.....
~~::.1J
~c b....
" "
'-'1 ;::
c '-'1
~ ~
DR
. .. .
....... .......
~.~~..~:2~.~
~...:. :-:.... ....
.........:...
n,~. ~~.'..~....~.i.:~;.:).:.:.::.::..:
k;'::::::-:-:'::! 1(,
.: ........ ~
i~'..i:--:'::'::':J
i::\':'.:":-.:::..::i
:~.~~:~::.~.J:~-/~.:.';.:.~ ~ :.~
i:':.:::..::.'.:.'::..:::.:::.::,.......::i
>.....................'!or-...... . i ': ::::.::::: ::.':: \:i..... ::..::-'::':.::.:<.:1
...::::~ ~':';;';"~;,:';;';'.;'.':'..i..i.;.":.;.:";';'i
:~::::::.::.::.:.:i:..(:.~?;7~.~j
::::ii.:; ;'.:':::: ~;,:: :';:} :'.i\::.(:::::::ii.!
.:: ::.}.:': :'::"i::':;: :::';';: ii;::.\. :~: ::.;A WI S T F UL I
i::i:ii:;"',':'i'h7.;~T;~~;FT*~S~'~~;~"i~~WJ~~i;~i%~~i~;l~W',:'::'~];,'i:::4':!b::
.......~.
.: :.:",-::..
L '.' ...."J
i:\:i.::;:'::::j
~i:'::;'.;:::::J
l. .....1
... ..
.....:...-..
(.:.:.::.,:.:.~
tL.l~:,
8pn
WlJR. (~'f''''''lV
N ..~c..r; .
t ~:::':.:::.::::l
".""
t""fl
;:;:..:f!
~;~
~:c~I!
~
~::.;?~
J:i;?':i:;::.:::!
. ... ..... ......... ......... ... .... . -. .... . . - .. . . ... ..... . . .......
.. ........... :.-".. ........... ." .. ..........- :...... .... .................. .. ..:.......... .......:... ........ .......:... .................-... .."..... ".:"" ............ ..:.....
.. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
...... .... .. .... ...... ...... .. .. .. ...... ..
... .. .....-......... .. .... ~ ..... .. . .. .... ~ ..... .. . .. .'. . ~ .... .... .'...- .... .. .. ... ~ .. .. ..... .... ~ .... ..... .... ~ ..... .... .. .... ~ ..... . . .. .. . .. . ~ .. ... . ..
. .. . . . . . . . . .
. ... ..... . . ... .... .. ... .... .. ... .... .... .... .... ..... . .. ..... . ...... . ....... . ....... ..
. . ..,.. .
.. ... .. . .. ... .. . . ... .. . . ... .. . . ... .. . . ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . ..
. . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .
... .. .. . .. .. .. ..... .. ... .. .. . .. .. ..
II I I II I II I I II I II I I II . II I I II I II I I I I I II I I II I II I I II I II I I II I II I I I. I II I I II I II
. . . . . . . . . .
.. ..... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ..... .. ..... .. ..... ..
.. . ..... ... ..... ... ..... ... ..... ... ..... .. ..... .. .....
.. . .. . .. . ... .... .. .... .. .. . .. . .. . ... .... .. .... .. .. . .. . .. . ...
. .. . .
. . ... ... ... . ..... ......... .... ..... .... ..... ....... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... . . . ... ... . . . ... ... . . .
.. ... .......... . .. ... ...... .. .. . ........ ... ......,.. ... ......... ... ...... . . . ..... . . . . ..... . . . . .......
. ..
. ..... . .. ....... .. ........ .. ........ .. ....... . .. ....... . .. ....... .
... .. ... .. ... ..
. ..
..... . .... ..... . ....
.. .
.. ... .. . .. ... . .
. .. ...... .
. . ... .
. ... . ....
. .. ... . .
... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ...... .
. ..... .
. ... . .... .... . .... ..... . .... ..... . ...
.. .. .. .
. .. ... .. . .. ... .. ...... .. ... ... . .
... . ..... .... ..... . '.
. . ... . ... . . ... . ... . .
.. .. .
. .. ... .. . .. ... . .
Location Map
Owner James R. & Cheryl J. Mulich Case: ANX2008-02002
Site: 2327 Nursery Road Property 0.446
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 19-29-16-70272-300-1902
From: RS (County) R-3 (County)
To: RS (City) LDR (City) Atlas Page: 317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02002 - 2327 Nursery Road - Mulich\Maps\Location Ma~teEll # 10
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 7
Aerial Photograph
Owner James R. & Cheryl J. Mulich
Site: 2327 Nursery Road
Land Use Zoning
From: RS (County) R-3 (County)
To: RS (City) LDR (City)
Case:
Property
Size (Acres):
ANX2008-02002
0.446
PIN:
19-29-16-70272-300-1902
Atlas Page:
317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02002 - 2327 Nursery Road - Mulich\Maps\Aerial PhotogrJ~eJ!tib # 10
Owner James R. & Cheryl J. Mulich
Site: 2327 Nursery Road
Land Use Zoning
From: RS (County) R-3 (County)
To: RS (City) LDR (City)
.... .
. ..
:-::~:i:':::
.:..};O:"::,
,:IZ:-::i.
.:.Q:::.:..
,.:0"::"
....:4;"::....:.
.:.:u:c:':.
;:::i,:;r\:.
...
..
:~q~..:...
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 7
566
a:: 1433
143 Cl 1437
1475 557 0 567
...,J
a::
1481 1444 <::( 1445
U
556 566 ...,J
~ 547 III
:z: 1451 I-
1450 0 144 a::
1487 555 ::iE 569 ~
10 548
~
11 1493 CI)
g
co co 1450
~ ~
1499
12 552 551
80
l' g iil l' iil @ @ iil
'" '" .... ... 00
:::l ~r l ... '"
:::l '" '"
19 '"
(2) I NI CD
t:::; 17
LRJ
60
1487
.. ..... .. .
.. .. ....
.,:::.:-:-:. .....::.:::::...'",:,:,:::.:-:-:.........::.:::::..:",:,:,:::.:
.:.'..... :..':. "G':"~"'h':"':""
1::':::'//':: :/:.i:;:'i:jjd?#fi::=:.iS{:::i.;::':::'.;
.....:.:::: ..:::.....::,.:.::..::>:..:.:::::..: ::.....::::.......::>....:.,
..:::.:. ':::.." .;.: ;;: :::.:....: ::.." .;.: ;;:::
1..[:1:, r:::~:;';~:':':::I';::::":,:,::::'.
.:.:.: :.: ::.:~ ":" ~ ".:.: ::".:'::. ::::::.: i:": :.:-:.: :.: ::. :~ i . ~ ".:.: ::".:'::. ::::::.: i:"::; ".::
..:."::: .:.-:.::.". :;:.; :': :."::::. -:.::.".:;:.; :': "."
0:;:.;:;: :....::.:..;.;'.-;.:..:;:.;:;:;. '''::':..;.;".';-:..; '.;
I' ~\::>: ':'::::.:':::: ':": :'" ::" ~\::>:'.:''> .:' ,::'::.:: :'.: ,:' ~':.
.:..... :.:....:...........:......:.-.........-......:..
:::i: i::;' ;iii::''=: :\'::::: ::.::' ;::.::: i::; ':.\:::ii::''=: i:.'::~::: ::.::' i:::
I.:':::.:::';: .;.:.:.;:....:.::.:,>::.:;:":-.:':::.:::.;:;.;: .:.;:....:.::.::::::.:;:":-.:.:::
.:."::: .:.-:.::.". :;:.; :': :."::::.:.-:.::.".:;:.; :'::."
.:::,,;: :.....:.>>::'.::-::. :,:::,,; :.: :",...:.>>::...::-::. :':::'
!i:':;'::,:,:' :':::~::,:~:::: '. :':,l,;::::\'::,:,":::::~?:,::,:'i,:::i~. :':,l,;::~
1.:"=.::.:::.. .::'.:::...:'::.':::.::>.::::.:'.:.::.:::'.:.:'.::'.:::".:'::.':::.::>.::.:.:.,=::
:z:
...,J
CI)
::(
<::(
r l 0
1492 >-
I ~ I ~
L;2J 5
u
60
1493
iil NURSERY RD
....... .... . ..
III I IIIII II II .,1 ,.,11111 II II
1':'.":':::':.:':":'::'::-'::':"":':": ,...:.:::.:.:.:..:.::,::-.::.:.:',':,:.':':.-
g O:-:::~:::~:';'-'~'i'::.>::.'::.: :.:':':. ::'~.:::i::~;:';.:i:~:'::.>::.'::.: :.:':':. ::'::=:-:::.J
". ill .. . . . .
50
1528
1
1527
T3l
2
18
...
... .... .
.. . . .
.. ... . ... .. ...
:1~'::i.:..~ \.':':::": :'.::::-:..~:::--~:.::.::'::i::..~ :\"'. ":. ::;" ::.:: .:.: ::.::.":
. .. '. "'1531' ....
i )i '.~::i!:;' ;::W.::::'i:;4u:' "\': !/i:i:i :::':::::i:l:;'::'::U:';,.
;:: ::. iii ,i:,:'i/: t:.;:.;. ::il ::::: . iii (=::,:'i:'.:: i: .;.~.;. ::i. i::.
;,: ::::.i~::.:~:,:~:: ::t:~:::~ili: ::.i~::'=:::,::}:~:i::::\{::.i::,:i:
i: ;;:'/.:::::::::::::?='::[781\ t/':::::::::::~:.::i::.:::::';i~.:.i:::\.;'
153
1540
... .
..... . ...
...... ...... ...
.::;:.;.:. :~/.;.:.~.~ .~~. r.t ~~::~..:'.~'::;:.;.
..::::::...:.:.:.:.:.::.:.::-:~:::..:.::::
.. .. ... .
. ... . .... .
.. .
... .. . .
:::.:::,.;':::::,;G\';(,::,::,:,:::.::
::::'=;::.:::':-:-3~:,:::::,-:-:'.:'::i
Proposed Annexation Map
Case:
Property
Size(Acres):
ANX2008-02002
0.446
PIN:
19-29-16-70272-300-1902
Atlas Page:
317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02002 - 2327 Nursery Road - Mulich\Maps\Proposed Annexation
Map.doc Item # 10
Owner James R & Cheryl J Mulich
Site 2327 Nursery Road
Land Use Zoning
From RS (County) R-3 (County)
To RS (City) LDR (City)
h
w
. - ~
,x
~
~
3 5
1480 1481
1486 60
1487
2 :z: 6
...,J
RS CI)
::(
1 r l <::(
0
>-
1492 a::
I ~ I 7
I-
<i) :z:
L~J ::> 1493
0
U
60
g NURSERY RD
.'
:0,..:.
':J!~f:'':''
'..]S::'::.
':{~f:::i.
:.Q::':.:..
':~::"::::
'..-\;!.I.:'.:.
.:.-....:.:.:
{i::::\.:
: sa .
.".iiIi"
RM
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 7
I: ':.:'"::. :.-:::: <-:.:-:':":: :.:: ':.:'":::.:<..:::: <':.:'?:: :.:: ':.:'
.:'.....:.:.:...~::'~.:.:,:.....:,.;-:..:::'::
!i::. :;."(: i.:.::::';:?'::':' :16:;;"7~' i:-::.:.::::':: ,:. .:.~.:. ::i .i::.:
- .. .'.L;:::.' .... ..:.:2:]'
II' :'i[::i:!!i;;~::flt;[::i!!ii!:ii':ir : 'j"
i'.-;;: .::::..:..::.....::...-:;::..' :::.':'-::-...::':; R~ I
i:i':'-:, :.:.::.). .:.:,:;:::: i':::';::::':,::"'::::'::::i' ~
. ..':.:'::'_'..: >::".:-:: ::.....: ":'. :::..: >::".:':: 2 0
:'::':'.'.'. :":-,':':::':-':.:'::':"::':'.'.'.:.;:'-:-.':':::':'.:':::':"::':' Ll:::J
f::::':::::.: :..i:-:':':'::'>\.:'::.::::::.:\: ::.: :..i:.:':':-::'>\.:'::.:::
r',:';,: '.:::.:.-::.":,:....::.:.:.:.:.:.::::.::.:.;,:::::.:::.:.-::.":,:....:=.:.~.:.:.:.::::.::.:
::.:.....:.:. :.:.::.:.:::.-:.::.....::::-:.....:.::...:.=.::.:.:::::.::.....::::.:...
.:..;..... ,"'::'.:. ".;:;::;: ..;....::...-::..:....::;::;:..;.
i:;}' ii?~::;'~::'::':' ;:/;.??- ii(i:::::::-i;':: i':'~':' ;:/;'::;~
;.':...'.' ::.:' :.'.'-.:.....'.::..:.:.'.'::::.:' :.'.'::. ':.'.::.':..
I....,.:::: :.:':'::.:':.:-:':';':":::"-"::.:'::::.':.:.:.::.:':.:':':.'-':'.:::','.,:
:..:.::..:=:::
:;;":"::::":',:.:\:.
566
a:: 1433
Cl 1437
0 567
...,J
a::
<::( 1445
U 566
~
:z: 1451
0 569
::iE
1444 Cl
548 :::.
...,J
III
I-
a::
~
~
CI)
1468 (<<J-~-
, \ 8 1475 557
I 9 1481 556
0=
1438
1444
547
J /
f I
1450
555
1487
10
1492
~
1
11 1493 Iil
554
<0 '"
;t <0 1450
1499 ;t
12 553 552 551
80
1498
g i\i~':'-':'-:::.:.:.::-:
:", .:.:;:
as ~
l'
g
as ~
~ as
50
....: ::: .::....:.
'"
~ ~r l
I ~ I
Lf7:J
17
&5
~
'"'
~
i':
I fl
I
I
I
I
19
(2)
:::':' :::
CD
~~. 1505
m:\::: ::::::':jY~;:::\\::::,,::' ~ii:~ ~:~; 1
~:'.::-: :::;:::..>.:'.p:.:..::.:;.:': .,:-:.....:'-:':.-:::. 9 1528 1527 ~, \
:::.': :::.:.:.":::::::':;;:u.'::::.:.:. :..:.:.-':":':.::::::::.'~ S 1F l 18 10
0;:::.: :;":.:;':::.:-.\:;:::::::;:.:::;: .:.:..:;.:.:;':::.:..\:;:::::.:~ 2 .> ~
",",.. .. .._ . ...... ..... _ .... 9 <5' >
~;):, /?~i.i::t;,,;::',r-:,::::::: :':::::::~:,r::'~qi:r';::',i:::,: 8 : ~! '.:.';. :":':' "; .. ..~.::.......;;.; 7$~ 'b 0
.i::.....(,~'1t':t:.:.:.:::.::::...:.~.:.::;:..i:: 1534 LI'-J3 ..:.' '.:..:. ..:.~.....:--:; RL K0N
:i<.:..::\;::;::...-::::..~:::.'::'::'::::.)::.:.:";~:-:.:..':-,::<':'.: 1540 1539 :':::":'-':_'::<'<:;::'.':=:':'.:.:'.:-:: 8 1540 ~
.:'~':m<::~:.,.~'mil','. ' ~ k:':?;~"';;::~': ~~
: li5~i;~'i~i!':::i:?iii~! ~ \ :s~:":!ii;::':':'::',: , :< j ~4~
:{::"::P:.::::.I~F.~:.:.:.:.::.:-::.: :' . . ::.... ..:. L- _
~'::.::-:,,,,,,,.:.:.:::..:~.......~." ...:.:.L........::: :: ......:.:... ... .. ..
::-:~ ~:~:.:...: :...... ....... .....::..:::..::.-.:......:.:.:...::....::..::...:-.....:.:.: .:::......::...:....RU.. :....If\...::...:......:-:. ...::....::..:...:......:.:.:..::
:. :'ii,:-.": :::: ;.l!1: - .;,: :. :'.: ... ..: .: ";:". . : ::': ':'. -.':" .: .'. . '.' ';'C:.:': .::::. ::..; :',:'.:-: :::: ;:';~": ';:='C:.:':: .::::. ::"i -: :::: ;\": '::'.' ::'.:'::.:::., ';.: ....:: \J:; ':.'; :: ':.t:=-:'-'i ,.:" :::: i;\ ';::. : ':-:-::.::::. ::i;:. .:...':
..R$....,i,;,.,i.,.,_~..-.,:.:.:,~,:,i,i...-:,.:,:,,:,::..~}~~~~.......,~:"~"1i",.~,~
:.:-,'i[ i:-:::-:-i:.:Ji:~.:.::;:.:::~:.:..0~~\.:[.:.t1a.~~:.i.. ::i'.:.~.:.::;:~':i::.:-.'( .i:-:-?-~\..~~'.':.'.:.:U?:7::;.'.::.:.:..:.':.:.',..:::::.:-:.:.::':.:::;:,.:.'::;..:':.':.,:'::::.:
\
Future Land Use Map
Case
Property
Size (Acres)
ANX2008-02002
0.446
PIN
19-29-16-70272-300-1902
Atlas Page
317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02002 - 2327 Nursery Road - Mulich\Maps\Future Land Use
Map.doc Item # 10
. . : : ~
.'
:-::_~:i:}
....]S::.::
;':{~f::::'
.:.Q:::.:..
:.:~}.:'::
...-\;!.I':'.
.::....:.:.:
(u,;::
.;:~..::::.:.
::60..
--.oIIII
h
w
,){~
~
3 5
1480 1481
1486 60
2 :z:
...,J
CI)
::(
<::(
1 r l ~
1 ~T ~
L~J 5
u
60
[DR
1493
~ ~D 1:/::; ::.:~::.:,: CI: ~ ~r l
~i,:'~~\: .i.... .... ,..i ... ~ ~ J
m::.::::::::;:!i\.:':L'i.:i: ;:':::\::.:: 1528 15271 LD R
;((.U(.....(.it..:" 'F l, 18 ~'" \%
~.:.;.~I:::~}ll,,~ii::.:i:; · ::; ~: ~ j'i-:::;'::::%\ . ,,)~Jq
..;';',:'.-.":':':::::" :.:,.:::..s.....;..,:...i~":ti.:.:::,:::.:.:.:.::: 7 l k ,:':,::::',:-::,:=,::'GY';:((::':::.:':.: ----,--- , \
:.:. '.::.:::::::'::::~.'.-;.:.'.:.::'.:.:.:::.::.'.:[.:.:..::::.:.::....!....1.:..:.:.'.:.:.,:.::.:.:;_.. :::::::':::::'.:.:::...'.:.~:'.:.:.:::.::.'.:::.:.:.'::::.:.::.:.!_'.':.:.':.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.::...:. ~ I 4 :':.::::.':::'::,.:.:: ",:'::.>:i..:-:.: 'if) 7
,co; 7$~75 5 i::"::'::;::":-::::::H::::.:;i:1i.,:,::::::::~::: 7 '" j
;: ?i/:~:::~.:::r::::~/r:' ::.i::~.\L:.;;i::::i{:':.\i:"J .'. . . ._ H,. 6 ~
': -i/.!::::::::::::.i.IDB:'::: i/.!::::::::}.i.::'.:::'::';:::rr!\':':::.: 6 5 'i.:: .:" ;::.:'" ,:\_~:::.>:. ::::_:. I
i-:':\:"~',~__":;.:.i;~:i'i::;:'..i.::..:.~;~::;~~\t~~;,;,,:,~:,~,:'i'~;
':i::.i,'i[ ii:-:-i;';Ji:!':':u::(~~:':::W~::::.:Z:~~.'({ii:-:-i" ;:i'.:.~.:.::::~':i::.i,'(: :'.:::.:::.~.rr}~~:.?t:::::':::':::..;.',.:.,(:::,:.;.-:.;:;':':'.':::::'.i::..:'(:.':/:':
.... .. ..... .. .
. ,. .11. ....11
. ... ..... .......
.. .. . ... ... ..... .. ... .
.. ..... .
.'.... "i':.:::'::'F:':::~:':: :.::.::-:.:}ti.:.::':':':::~:'
.. :i:,;':'::':::As~:~-:';':;0:ii.::.::::";:':
1468 (<<J-~- 0=
1438
,\ 1475 557
8
3
I 1481 1444
1474 556
9
566
a:: 1433
Cl 1437
0 567
...,J
a::
<::( 1445
U 566
~
:z: 1451
0 569
::iE
Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 7
~
Ml1\.~ ~
- "
~ 1440 ~
...,J
547 CIJ
I-
1444 a::
548 ~
~
Iil CI)
'"
<0
;!
1450
MDR
.. ..
. ..
..... ......
1487
...
. . . ...
. .... .. .. .
. . .. .
..... .. .. ..... .. .
:~;~~~ '>;:,::::::.:':-:_':::::.:.'}:\~i::.:::::::m~;:'
::';' 'i:j;i;::i,~~::;:':':.i!
---
1456
554
<0
;!
553
552
551
80
~ as
CD
:::2
I fl
I
I
I
I
........--
&5
~
I I
2 1 81
Ll::J
J /
f I
1487
1450
555
17
Zoning Map
Owner James R & Cheryl J Mulich Case ANX2008-02002
Site 2327 Nursery Road Property 0.446
Size (Acres)
Land Use Zoning
PIN 19-29-16-70272-300-1902
From RS (County) R-3 (County)
To RS (City) LDR (City) Atlas Page 317A
10
. . .... ..
. . .
. . ... . . . ... .
..
. ..
.. ...... . . .
. . . .
11 1493
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02002 - 2327 Nursery Road - Mulich\Maps\Zoning Maplltern # 10
. . .
... . ... .
.. . . ..
1492
1498
.... ....
.. .. ..
...
..
.. . .. .. .
.. ..... .
,. ...... ....
~ ... . ... . . .... ~ ..... . ... .. .... ~
. :.. /i~:::'~:"::,:, (: .":::::::. iii i::=::,:'i;:':: i'.:.~.:. (: .":::~
. ... . .
..
. ..
.. ...... . . .
. . . .
. .. .
. .
.. ..
1499
12
"-l.!I.iTll n
.,.,....,_. .....,:; .."
.. .... ... .......
. .. ... .. ..
. .. ....... . .......
~.:""'...' ..;.. .. . ....:.. ~.:.:.... .;.. .. . ....:.. ~
::: .~:: {/.:- :::..;.. ..:,:.". .:~.:.::: f;~:: {(:- :::..;.. ..:.:.". .::: :.:.:::
g l'
'"
"
19 fl
(2)
~ as
g
'"'
fl
....
"
.'
.'
.i.~:i:::':
....]S::.::.
;':{~f::::'.
.:.Q:::.:..
:.:~}.:':::
......;1.1-:".:.
.:.-....:.:.:
(u,;::..
';:~"::::':"
....
...
.'
,a
.....-
h
w
2{
~
....
3 5
c4~80( 1481
e
.,- 60
Earn.~ 14:7
Resi :tir tial
<::(
1 r l ~
1492 a:: 7
I ~ I ~
L~J ::> 1493
0
U
60
g NURSERY RD g
Multi
Family
Residential
I ;: :.<:'::': :.-:::.:: ::-.':.:-:':",: ,,:: :.<:': :.:.:...:::.: : ::-.':.:'~':",: ,,:: :.<:
.:.'..... :..':. ..e.:.'~...h.:...:.'..
!:i.:'i:::;::::/:i(::i:F.4~;~::i:~i'::::'::i.:':~
..:::.:. ':::.." .;.: ;;: :::.:....: ::.." .;.: ;;:::
':.':11 r'p'i;l;;~i':':iil';'::f'i;,,::':
.:.:;:.:::.:~ .:.~.:.: .'.: .:aee: '() :';:.::::::.::.:.:.; .;:
......::: .:..:.::...:;:.;:':...:::... .:.::...:;:.;:': ...
ii;i:i::?:i:s.v6..p$.':',,:::';:':":::::~;:"-:"::.,::ii;
:::.:::. i::;: ;/ii:;'i:\'::::: ::.::' ;::.:::. i::; ::.\:::ii:;'ii:.'::~::: ::.::' i:::'
I.:.:::.:::.,' .;.:.:.;:....:.::.:;:.::.:;:.:..:.:::.:::.,';.;: .:.;:....:.::.::::::.:;:.:..:.:::
.:..::: .:.-:.::... :;:.; :': :..::::.:.-:.::...:;:.; :'::..
.:::':;: ,.....:.>>:;:'-::-::. :::-':':; :.: ::':<.>>:::'.::-::. :::::'
.,::,:':-'. ....:::::::....:,::::, ::.:.:-..:....:::::::..::,::::,::..
I.,':.: '.c:;.",' ....:..,.:.:.....:..... '...:.10
.::::::.:-/. /::~::,:~:..;:.;.(:..:::::::.:-/ii:::::.:i:i.::(.;.~.;.(:..::~
I'.:::':. .:;-:....:.-:-:-:-:.::.:..:::.:.::.::.:....:::-:.:-:.::.:-.'::
I::.. ::. .:.. ........:.....;.. ::...:.. ...............;..
mr.:..:.::.:::',:;:;'::.::i,:,;,,::;':ir/::::\:.':.:::';:;';'::i:.:'~':',::;,:,;'::,::,~
."':M'.. ..:.... . ....:.. ,.:........:.... . ....:..,.) M g g l' g g g g
::':,'.':"':""'."';1".""" ',,~ ' G qit::i "0: !; ~
Q;..;i'::::/!~:::::\\)": '" ~ ti:~l Lf7:J II
'1.:!iJi~i~!:ii,i:,i:I:;:j::'i:;. : ',~8 :;; ; ~:,.::;:~; R~U~
~,,"i:''Ti,':'':~.1ttf'' "" ~~,J:">":,'. "40 ~
::.\:ti-i::.::..::::'.::....:'..:.:...~,o;!:a.g~~:.:.;.: 7 I k 'i-i:.::..:~gl,~~~ \
:'. ;::.:.:.:.~::\i:.:t;'>1:\ E..... .:'a':::::m::: ':":1":1' .y:::.:: I --+-1 1545 i':::.:. ::':F'::::a:" m::":':-":'Jfl. tT <.0
...... 0'~' .. ~ ~ . ... .~f ~
ti,'i:::~::~;~i,I~~~~~i'tial" ,~' \ ~~,:)~~~~ ntl " I ~~ '
.":i,;:ii!i,~,j':f;~,,.:::,i:~:i':i';ii,,:,.:.::,~:~.:~1~~,,;"i,~:,~,:'i~~
;':i::.:-,'i[ ii:-:-i;.;Ji:!.:.:u:'(~~:.::t-1i.?:.:Z:~~.'({ii:-:-i.. ;:i'.:.~.:.::;:~':i::.:-.'(: :..:::.:::.~.rr}~~:.?t:::;:':::.:::..;.',.,.'(:::.:.;..:.;:;':':'.':::;:'.i::..:'(:.':/:':
Attachment number 1
Page 6 of 7
1468 ( <<J-~-
, \ 8 1475 557
566
~
MJ.KT I.'.~.
~ ~
144G~
547 CIJ
I-
144 a::
~
~
Iil CI)
0=
a:: 1433
143~ Cl 1437
o
...,J
a::
I 1481 1444 <::( 1445
U~ B U _
9 ~
I I J / 1450:Z: 1451
I N I f I 1487 555 ~ 569 548
2 ~ "II ~le Fa~1 ~e~lident al
L r-- J 11 1493 }:56
1492 554
1498 ~
1 1499
12 553
567
co
~
1450
552
551
80
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Case
Property
Size (Acres)
ANX2008-02002
0.446
Owner James R & Cheryl J Mulich
Site 2327 Nursery Road
Land Use Zoning
From RS (County) R-3 (County)
To RS (City) LDR (City)
PIN
19-29-16-70272-300-1902
Atlas Page
317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02002 - 2327 Nursery Road - Mulich\Maps\Existing Surrounding
Uses Map.doc Item # 10
View looking south at the subject property, 2327 Nursery Road
View looking west of 2327 Nursery Road along Nursery Road
View looking northwest of 2327 Nursery Road
Attachment number 1
Page 7 of 7
View looking west at the subject property, 2327 Nursery Road
View looking east of 2327 Nursery Road along Nursery Road
View looking south of 2327 Nursery Road
ANX2008-02002
Mulich, James & Cheryl
2327 Nursery Road
Item # 10
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO, 7937-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF NURSERY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET
EAST OF WINCHESTER ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION
OF LOT 19 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16
EAST, PINELLAS GROVES, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS
IS 2327 NURSERY ROAD, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE
CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WH EREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the
City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
See attached legal description
(ANX2008-02002)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby accepts the dedication
of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public, which have heretofore
been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk
and the Planning Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the
official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk
shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after
adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after
adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 10
Ordinance No. 7937-08
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 7938-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE
CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
NURSERY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET EAST OF
WINCHESTER ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF
LOT 19 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE
16 EAST, PINELLAS GROVES, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 2327 NURSERY ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION
INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL
SUBURBAN (RS) PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City
of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter
described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
See attached legal description
(ANX2008-02002)
Land Use Cateqory
Residential Suburban (RS)
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent
with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7937-08.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 10
Ordinance No. 7938-08
Attachment number 4
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 7939-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF NURSERY ROAD
APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET EAST OF WINCHESTER
ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF LOT 19 IN
SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST,
PINELLAS GROVES, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS
IS 2327 NURSERY ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(LDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
See attached legal description
(ANX2008-02002)
Zoninq District
Low Density Residential
(LDR)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7937-08.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 10
Ordinance No. 7939-08
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential/Office General (R/OG) and Initial Zoning Atlas Designation
of Office (0) District for 2235 Nursery Road (a portion of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East in Metes and Bounds 33/08);
and Pass Ordinances 7931-08, 7932-08 and 7933-08 on first reading. (ANX2008-02003)
SUMMARY:
This voluntary annexation petition involves two adjacent parcels totaling 0.59 acres ofland. The northern parcel (19-29-16-00000-330-
0810) is a strip ofland that provides access to the southern parcel (19-29-16-00000-330-0800), which is occupied by an office use. Both
parcels are approximately 450 feet east of South Belcher Road along Nursery Road. The applicants are requesting this annexation in
order to receive solid waste and sanitary sewer service from the City. The property is contiguous to existing City boundaries to the
north and east. It is proposed that the property be assigned a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential/Office General (R/OG)
and a zoning category of Office (0).
The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the provisions of Community Development Code
Section 4-604.E:
. The closest sanitary sewer line is located in the Nursery Road right-of-way and the applicant is aware of the requirement to pay
the City's sewer impact and assessment fee and is aware of the additional costs to extend City sewer service to the
property. Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The property is located within Police District III
and service will be administered through Police Headquarters located at 2851 North McMullen Booth Road. Fire and emergency
medical services will be provided to this property by Station 49 located at 565 Sky Harbor Drive. The City has adequate capacity
to serve this property with sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and EMS service. The proposed annexation will not have an
adverse effect on public facilities and their levels of service;
. The proposed annexation is consistent with and promotes the following objective of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan:
Objective 2.4: Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater
Community Development Code.
. The proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category is consistent with the current Countywide Plan
designation of this property. This designation primarily permits office uses with a Floor Area Ratio of 0.50. The proposed
zoning district to be assigned to the property is the Office (0) District. The use of the subject property is consistent with the uses
allowed in the District and the property exceeds the District's minimum dimensional requirements. The proposed annexation is
therefore consistent with the Countywide Plan, City's Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code; and
Cover Memo
Th d .. ... .. C' b d' h th d h f Item # 11. .
. e property propose lor annexation IS contiguous to eXIstmg Ity oun anes to tenor an east; t ere ore die annexation IS
consistent with Florida Statutes Chapter 171.044.
Review Approval: 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 11
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 7
DR
~/)...
< ~ 9.....
....,;;;'" ~ .~.
<(' c ~
~ ~
EElY::TL.K?:T~.SP FL q F.?:'!
~",... ."....... ',,\) )",\'jyqN' J{'\;..t J.... .rJR. .... .,1
r:!;!'li:~;~~~~~~~:I:~:!;:i~'t~;1
. . "". ruxiA.lltM;2 . . ~
. .. .... .. . ..
.....'...............~. ...... ............-..{"""..
~--. . -........._..IiI.
I:. : :", ",:" -: : :. : : : :-: :~.:- '.:.:.:. : :", ",:" -: : :.:
::;>':' :.::.:.:.:...-.:..:.;:::.... :;>':' :'::'.'1
!i::;::.,:'::1'.':::":'~.:,::.:::i.};::.,:'::::.C:~
. ..... . ......... . ..... - I ~2
i>..;: :':: :. '<.:..:..:.., :":< :.i:: :.': >..;: :':: :. .<.:~ 4'
r....; ...;..... :.:.... .;::....; "';'1..
i,:!:!!l:::,:~::~:t~1,'J~'_~~
:;;.;:.:.......;..:;..1 r;'" :.:'.:":;';.1
L:.;.;; "i:\rt~~ i:r!",:it:.;;:::;:..:::..::;:tl
1',.-1 i..... ....f
.....:::.~.. =::'::':..\"~ :'::::::':::.:.:\~:.~';
N U RSERY"RO k:",: .;.:;:::..-..:!
1CJ:i:::.:::'i:;:.L.:n (L
~.: i::'i:\..:'::tJ 1i5
~(::.:: ;:;.,\.::/:::::j f,::.:..:::.::l
r'" ..... . "1 r,'i::::;:,]
::.:. :.::'::,:,::::;.~,: '::'::'.;"::~ .. ";',: .:'.:.- : ..1
I::::::.':<'.:.:.:.'.:'J !.:..'.:'::::
:.:. :.:,":.: :.::.:", :.::":. :~~.~: ~:~~.~:.::':. :~.:: '~~."'.~.
I.......;..;.; ;;"':;", ...:.......;..;.; ;;"';:", ',,:", ....;
r.,::',;,: .:::': t:'~~~::f\;::: :'::"~:::'i:;"" ,i:::;\.:: :,::"::" (;;:':i:': :;''',
I ..... . ...~
: ;S-:.: ...:. ::.. ...:- ::. .::..: ...:. ::.. ...: ::. .::... ...:. :. ...: ::.-.::..: ...:. ::. ...: .: .::..: ...:. ::. ... 'I I ~r.:eserve. ....."
r::.'.:::.'.:.:~.::.'.::.~:..:.:~.::"':::"::,:":"::',,',':~".:::.'::.:'.~:~.:.~.'.,:.:..:::_;.'.'::.:~::...::....:.-::.::...::::~.:.:~.::...::;'.;:.;..~::...-:.':::..:: :.:::.;'.:::.:.:.:..,:....:::..,:.'::.::::.:.::'::.:;:~.:....~:.._~,...:::::.-:.::.::-..::;..~:.;..~:;...-:.':::",:::,:::,;::;::,':,:,:,',:".::::.:.:.'::.::::.:.::::.:.;.":'.::~.'.:::::.~..,y..::~.~:~.::.-.;::...:.':::".
..~..:.".;i::.':"(.:',.,..;::i.':":.,)'::::i ::;':"}/:":":i::::',:,::,./::,,i:',::iV<STF~~T A 0 R ' " ·
~ +~'~'.':'.':~:~::'4:4>'::"'~::: ;,;::::~J;22f''>,: .:. :.::.:.::','::, ::: ;::;.::::'.:'.>.: .:.,.:=::,:,: ,': ,: ,'':: ;<:::.:'.:'.:':: .:.:.::1 t:::;~:: =::'::i:t:;';'(::;.ii!.-\);:i,::': :::i~'::;'i')::;{i:",U::;:,:::::i~:::':::":'i:(~~:i;:'.:::/ (i:'::: .i'~':':
:.:'::: /:.::.';..(:: (::.::::.:::.: .:.:.:':-.;:'::.::.';..(::(::..:.:.:::.:-:. :.:.::.:;.::.~:.-;..(::(::.::::.:::.: .:-:.:';:.;/:.::.';..(:(::.:.::.: ::.: .:.:.:'::.;:'::'::.';..(::(~:.::_.:.:::~~.'~ ~.:~~~r;_7~~ 77.~~.":~':.-:.. :.:..:.~*:+.~:s:~~'~~:~)~~~-.:: :~:~.~~::..:..>~: :..;
"":,':',,:";';'."'i,:";":,:,';':,:".,,,:;,,',';:::,,:,..'i,...:',',;;::,.:;'....,(;,i,;";,;)'::.,,.,'i,;,:,;':\,:,:'.",;,:.,::;:,:"".'.,:,.::r../:.:".\,',;"::'(",.',;:..'i
"._, "",.,. .:,..... .... .. .. .... .:..: ..':':.':."'.'..::'.. .:.-..':':.':."'.'..::'.. .:....:': ':...' '.::'.' .:...,:,:.,:...". :.'... ........ .... .. ........ .:.
DR
RD
CR-474
o
0::: ,.'
~ I:::::;i"il:]
~ ,.,............,r:.::.:.;.:::'~
PROJECT
SITE
{~:l:,L~ijS(iJ
Location Map
Owner Seshaiah & Mamata Ponnaganti & Lee Reed Case: ANX2008-02003
Site: 2235 Nursery Road Property Size 0.59
(Acres):
Land Use Zoning 19-29-16-00000-330-0800
PIN: and
From: R/OG (County) P-1 (County) 19-29-16-00000-330-0810
To: R/OG (City) o (City) Atlas Page: 317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02003 - 2235 Nursery Road - Ponnaganti\Maps\Location Ml~ # 11
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 7
Aerial Photograph
Owner Seshaiah & Mamata Ponnaganti & Reed Lee Case: ANX2008-02003
Site: 2235 Nursery Road Property 0.59
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning 19-29-16-00000-330-0800
PIN: and
From: R/OG (County) P-1 (County) 19-29-16-00000-330-0810
To: R/OG (City) o (City) Atlas Page: 317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02003 - 2235 Nursery Road - Ponnaganti\Maps\Aerial
Photograph.doc Item # 11
[)
1453
1455
1463
1465
1467
1469
1471
1475
1477
1481
;.-'.::::::': .-:.:'.';':.....;:<;....::,:::.:.-:.:.... :'.' .,.,
.. .... ~ ."... . ... .. .... ~ .".. .... .
....,...,..;...~....,....,...,.............
i:::.ii.Ld~~.~::i:::/:Uji::.t';, i:-::.:': ".
. ... . . . ....
'-" ........ ....... .......0
. ... .. . .. ... . .
.. .. - . . . . . .. ... ... . .
. .
.. . ... .. .. ... - ..... . ..
..-:.::........'-:......-.:.....:-::........'-:....;0::....
.. .. - . .. ..
. .': -:: . I .. I.: . : . ~ -: : .- : .. ". .'. -: .- . I .. I.: .: . ~. :.' .:... .
,': -',,-: ,',: ::" '::.:::'::....:..:::.:: ::-..:.:~ ,',: ::" '::.:::':. ......:r,;.;.:, :.,
':'. :: : >.";':,:':;: :.: ::'.: :',':-::>':::'.:: : >.";':,:':;: :.: ::' :'.:'ur .:.:.
'. ". " ....-. ". ". .. '. ".u '.
.:.:: : : : ::.'. : ':'.:: :' :1 ~:" '.:.14i.iJ : : : ::.'. : ':'.: :' :: : ::: ,.:..!~,...: .:.::
::::::;i:'::\:'::: i;'::ii;:i:);'.:: ::';i::::ii:\:'::: i;':::-:i;:: :)~;:::i::
. .. ..... ...... .. ......-..,..,':..:: :,:: ....:lI.v::.
:::'.::.:.;:::."::>.;;;,(:'.:
::::r:::::.~:/, (i~:ii..'
.Q)........~...
.' ..~. ... '.: '::'.
Ac
9
10
r- - ---,
L202~ ---1
8
1496
iil
~
'" 1500 Q
8 ct:
ct:
III
:t:
1502 t)
..,J
III
III
CI)
o
11
'"
'"
'"
'"
.. .
..
:::::.:g::.-:';
:::':';::'~:/:i:.:.:Qll,""',,:
....
1499
I
'"
'"
'"
'"
8
" g
"
g
"
"
'"
~ 575 Bel
'"
E)
r- - ---,
I 06~---1
1505
~
.~
..::::,. <:..':
'"
'"
'"
'"
.:.'
.:,:.:: ,: "':.:. ,. )ii::~:~~i
:::~::::::::,:::::~),:::::::::
.. .
. . .. . .". .. .
I I I I
1545 ~
~
. .
. .
. ... ... ... .
....... ..
:-:,'.....~.:.:-
::;~::'i::i+tHt~:i::;:f:-'
I - ---,
l.-62 ~ ---1
..
::_: :..;., ~. ::. 0".'
':-': .:.:
1550 ::;: i ~::
'.'.
.:.:..<.:.::.': :..:' "'" :::,::
'-::.:.:.:. ....::.:.> '.. :::.:... ....
[:':/::7 ,." ......:'
::. .'.'. :-) :"".:.
:::'.~ :::. :"".':::::., :". :::
~
Proposed Annexation Map
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 7
\ .:A. /
3 ~'" ,,5
( ~ :
c '-'1
- "
1480.'2 c '4
~ ~ I"':'
148l 60 -
148
g
2 :z: 6
..,J
CI)
::( -
11l <::(
0
>-
I ;4r ct: 7
I-
<i) :z:
L~J ::> 1493
0
t)
60 '-------
NURSERY RD
Owner Seshaiah & Mamata Ponnaganti & Lee Reed Case: ANX2008-02003
Site: 2235 Nursery Road Property 0.59
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning 19-29-16-00000-330-0800
PIN: and
From: R/OG (County) P-1 (County) 19-29-16-00000-330-0810
To: R/OG (City) o (City) Atlas Page: 317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02003 - 2235 Nursery Road - Ponnaganti\Maps\Proposed
Annexation Map.doc Item # 11
." ."
. .. .. ...
':': :.<.M:::-:.ft::>~~:1:'.::::::::-:.
........:..S503(J':. ........:....... ....
:::'-..::-':.:L2;.:..:~::::::~:'::::::.:..:';::':::'::::::-,
..:......-:..;-:::...::. .....:......-:..;.::: .:et"..:.
:::::.:.~.:'.i ;:n.-t:.::'.i':::::~i:: ;':::'::':'~':"i ;:n.t;.::'. :::'::'::'::/'.
::\:::..:' ::.::.;'i:::'.H:::'i:;~1':'~\i~:.:' ::.::.;'i::..;:'/ :i~::'::\:
................R...S................. '0'
':::;'::'.:.: :::.':: ;:'';:::':':. i. .-..... ,:::'::'L.::'.::~,:::,;,:::' ::': :::::~i:::\
':::i::i:t~::..:: :)at:.;:;::
::':crt:: :':~:"" 1 I l
:....... '<.'::'::;'.:'. I:T
..... :i..::.<::.': L~J
55 .:::.:.~/::.:....,
~
:.6tl....
. . iif
D
1453
1455
1463
1465
1467
1469
1471
;:;~ 9
1481
10
RH
Ac
CG
CG
r- - ---,
L202~ ---1
8
o
11
1499
a
'"
~
1496
I
g
8
lj~!~ ~
10
'"
'"
~
~ as
l'
iil
l'
l'
Iii
~ ~ 1500
~
CG~
E)
575 Bel
Q
ct:
ct:
III
:t:
t)
..,J
III
III
CI)
R/O/R
CG
r- - ---,
L-06~ ---1
1505
::.
1502
'l'::':.:"
. ... ... ... .
.: :.':;.~ ::"::':::':<~;$:~~<:';.:::'-
(;.:: ~-:::::.:..::.:~::.:~~.:<-
. -. .. . ~ ." -.. ....
I II 11111 I I
..
1545 ~
~
-. ...
.:-.: :: :.:::"':~i:j;;(: :.,
..:.;~::.i:::\>~0~<::.i\
... .. .
.. . ~ ." -.. ....
.. ..... ..
r- - ---,
L-62~ ---1
RM
RH
II II
'.
... ....
". . ..
... ..
.. ... -.. ..
.... ....
1550
... ... ...
.... .. .... ....
. .
. . - .
. . .
. .
. ... .. . . . ... .. . . . ..... .
.... .. ... - ... ....
III I 111111111111 I ,.1111,,111, I 111.111111
.... ............... ................ ............
.. ............ ....::....... .8t.Q(#'" ...... ...... ....::......
':,:;:':::::::II':;:i:::::t:'::::~:::::::::;~:':::.::.:.:;:':::~:::i'::~,::':,:;:':::::::I.,.:;::::t:t:'::::;:::::::::;::,:::r:.
'::::::-.~f\:: :::::':: (i:i'):"i7:~:~':"::::::: i:':: ~::~\u~::'::::::i::i:'::::::: i:':: ii;:i\::::i::-::
~s
.. ..
..... .
. ... .. . ~ ..... .... . .... ~ ..... ....
. ..... . .. ..... .. ... ..... ..
...
. .. . .. ..
Future Land Use Map
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 7
\ ..:&. /
3 Me ,,5
~ !f\~ ~
1480 ~ ~.~.. 4
~ >;: 1-
R~6 60 I--
~ 1487
:z:
..,J
CI)
::( '--
<::(
o
>-
ct:
I-
:z:
::> 1493
o
t)
60_
iil NURSERY RD
Owner Seshaiah & Mamata Ponnaganti & Lee Reed Case: ANX2008-02003
Site: 2235 Nursery Road Property 0.59
Size (Acres)
Land Use Zoning 19-29-16-00000-330-0800
PIN: and
From R/OG (County) P-1 (County) 19-29-16-00000-330-0810
To: R/OG (City) o (City) Atlas Page: 317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02003 - 2235 Nursery Road - Ponnaganti\Maps\Future Land Use
Map.doc Item # 11
1453
1455
D 1463
1465
1467
1469
Ac 1471
1475
1477 9
1481
8
1496
C g
ili
'" 1500 Q
8 ct:
ct:
III
:t:
1502 t)
..,J
o
1499
l'
r- - ---,
L-06~ ---1
1505
1545 ~
~
MHDR
Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 7
l'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I r--
I . ~0272
HDK -
I
I
I
I
I
~
,,~
..
:'::.<.M>::+:"'>~~:8:'.::::::::-::: .....:<: : \ ~ /
.'.....:..S503(J':.........:........ ". M
::.-..::.::.:L2;-:..:~::::::~:'::::::.:..:;. 3 c ,,5
..-. ......:..:-::.....: :. '. '.':' "....:.':.::... . Ii:) .. "~
;,:'::.:.:,.::.:;'..-.:-:: ;:..:\:0:::.:.:;'.:::.:.:,.::.:;....:-: ::: '::.:0::.::':'. ( ~ ~
.":'::::::': i.:'.>.:,:',i':,:,:,::,'.:.,::::<:.;'.>.: ......f".::... 1481:86 ~60 ....i/..
:\:::..:' ::.:;.;'i:::'.H:::'i:;~1':'~\i~:.:' ::.:;.;'i::..;:'/: ii~::.;:\ 1487
;'.......;.;........;;...: .;..:;........;.;...,....;; "0" 2 <: 6
::=..:..:.::::.'::::,,::':':'::::::::.:':::;:':':i.:..~.::::.'::i:':':':::: :'::::~i;:::: ~
:::':::::i::::~::-::; i::5:t:.i:: ~ -
:')1<::.:; .::.~.:..::. 1 I l ~
..\1).... .... .. 1492 ct:
::'-::':::;';:')'.:;:::::::::'::::': 1.;- I I-
\i.:';':',"::' ':i..:;.<:..: L~J ~ 1493
:,':iJ{.,:: 0
....:.&'j.:;.:.:.' '. t)
":.:-::': ::: : 6tl". ". 60
TllVo.........-..
10
---,
---1
11
a
'"
gj
LDR
"'
gj
Dn
iil
l'
~
~ 575 Bel
gj
E)
'"
'"
gj
i:.>.:'.
;.:.:'
. ... ... ... .
":":'>'~''':''
...:...:::::.}::r::~{::::::.:
.. . ... ~ ." -.. ....
I I I I
. . ..
. .
-. ......
. .
....... .
-... .. . ..
....~.......
.. .... ...
. .
. ... .
- . . . .... .
. ":.:~:\:':i\:.:~~:~;:~~r': .:::::.:::;':
II I I .,1
MDR
r- - ---,
L-62~ ---1
..
. .
. ......
. . ... ~ ." -.. ....
. . ..... ..
1550
.. ..
. .
. .
.. ...
. . . - .
. .
.. .. .... ... .
. .. . . . .
. . .
.. .. . . .... . . ..... . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . ... .
... . ... .
II I II I II I I
. . .
.. .. . .. . .
. .
.. -. .. -
. .
II II . .. .
.. - ... -.. ... ... ...
-. ". .." .
. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
. ..,. .. ... .. . ..., . ..... .. . ... . . ..... .. .
. . ... ..... . ........ . .......
:::":"::::/':>';':::':/'::-:':::"~':':':::':.:::.':'':;::/.:;':';':::':/':::-:.:
:.;:::.:.:::,:::::::::::./.:'/i:;::,:'/:':';:,:~i:;::::';::':';:':':.:.:,::::::::::./.::/i:;::-:./:':
::::::-.~f\:: ;::::':: (i:i'):,i~:~:~':"::::::: i:':: ~::~\u~::';:::::i::i:'::::::: i:':: ii;:i::i:i::';
~
I
... .. .
. . ..... .
. . ,.. ,
Zoning Map
Owner Seshaiah & Mamata Ponnaganti & Lee Reed Case ANX2008-02003
Site 2235 Nursery Road Property 0.59
Size (Acres)
Land Use Zoning 19-29-16-00000-330-0800
PIN and
From R/OG (County) P-1 (County) 19-29-16-00000-330-0810
To R/OG (City) o (City) Atlas Page 317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02003 - 2235 Nursery Road - Ponnaganti\Maps\Zoning Mltem # 11
D
1453
1455
1463
1465
1467
1469
1471
1475 9
1477
1481
Multi
Family
Resid~ntial
.. ..
. ..... ...
';': :.<.M:::-:.ft::>~~:1:'.::::::::-:':
..'.....:..S503(J':. ........:........
':::'-..::-':.:L2;.:..:~::::::~:'::::::.:..:;
...:......-:..;-:::...::......:......-:..;.:::. "Q..
:;,:'::.:.:,.::.:;'..".:-:;::.':\:0:::.:.:;,.:::.:.:,.::.:;....:-:;:: '::.:0::.::':'.
:.',:., :', ::": i.:'.>.:,:',.-:.:.:.:.::.'.:.: :', ::":i';'.>.: ......f".::....
i\\:::' :};':::::~:. ;~{:: t:~~X::~::' :};'::::~:. ;;'/' ii~:'.;:\'
r':;.i:'::\:\ i;'::i~I:: ::';::::\:;::':'-:'l::;':::,:i~:: .:i2::i::.:
'-I ::::::'.:,...: .....'tLi:::..
Fan '~IY:'.',:, t::~:.:).:.
::&"":~l
1Res ....::.:..: .::: r4,
Ac
Retail
r- - ---,
L202~ ---1
Rpt~i1
8
o
..
. -. .
. .. . ~ .". . . ... . .
..... ....
:;::,':f';'; i:.::..:::':..:.:...
:::"::.~:/:..:''':;::::'.':::':''
":.:-::': ::: ::6tl". .....
.... ..lIiiil"..
'"
'"
'"
'"
1499
1496
I
'"
'"
'"
'"
g
8
"
~ as
"
iil
"
;;;
J\utomolJ il~
S~e ffi
StatioIls02 ~
III
III
CI)
'"
~
'"
E)
~,
575 Bel
'"
'"
'"
'"
. "CO
r- - ---,
I 06~---1
1505
t&.::.
~L;:
:,:...'....
Multi
Family
Residential
Retail
i:.::':.:'.
Multi
Family
Residentj al
. ... ... ... .
:::~::::':::\::~,i:::::i:
.. ..
. . .." . .."
. -. .. .... ~ ." -.. ....
. . ..
I 11111111 I I
. . .....
':;':::':Of.fi~:e':::
'.:~::':::i::i~ii::::'::,
r- - ---,
L-62~ ---1
1545 ~
~
...
. .... . .
....... .. .
. . . .". .". .."
. -. .. .... ~ ." -.. ....
. . ..
. ... ..... ..
- . ... .. . ..
1550
::. ::.::':.': "';':':':'i;';' ::.:.:,
.:i":' :::
:. .:..: :":,
::::.
.',
.::':.
::.::.
:.: ',:.
st.:',
.'.
',',
Open
Space
h.
.:..;-." :-:
:.i'C:.
.j;
:.::i{
:,.<::::,
~'.:'.:: ::.-....
is-:-:: :::. :.:. ":..
:.:.
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Attachment number 1
Page 6 of 7
\ ..:&. /
3 Me ,,5
( ~ ~
c '-'1
- "
1480,'2 '2 '4
~ ~ 1-
148l 60 --
148
...:
:z:
...,J
CI)
::( -
<::(
o
>-
a::
I-
:z:
::> 1493
o
U
60 0.........-..
iil NURSERY RD
11l
1492
I ~ I
L ;2J
Owner Seshaiah & Mamata Ponnaganti & Lee Reed Case: ANX2008-02003
Site: 2235 Nursery Road Property 0.59
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning 19-29-16-00000-330-0800
PIN: and
From R/OG (County) P-1 (County) 19-29-16-00000-330-0810
To: R/OG (City) o (City) Atlas Page: 317A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02003 - 2235 Nursery Road - Ponnaganti\Maps\ExistinlS
Surrounding Uses Map.doc Item # 11
View looking southeast at the subject property, 2235 Nursery
Road
View looking north from the subject property, 2235 Nursery
Road
View looking east from the subject property, 2235 Nursery
Road
Attachment number 1
View looking north at the subject property, 2235 Nursery Road
View looking west from the subject property, 2235 Nursery
Road
View looking west along Nursery Road
ANX2008-02003
Ponnaganti, Seshaiah & Mamata
2235 Nursery Road
Item # 11
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO, 7931-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET EAST OF SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
AND APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTH OF NURSERY ROAD,
CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF SECTION 19-29-16 IN METES
AND BOUNDS 33/08, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2235
NURSERY ROAD, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE
CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY
TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WH EREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the
City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
See attached legal description.
(ANX2008-02003)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby accepts the dedication
of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public, which have heretofore
been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk
and the Planning Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the
official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk
shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after
adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after
adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 11
Ordinance No. 7931-08
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 7932-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE
CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET
EAST OF SOUTH BELCHER ROAD AND
APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTH OF NURSERY
ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF SECTION 19-29-
16 IN METES AND BOUNDS 33/08, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2235 NURSERY ROAD, UPON
ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS
RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE GENERAL (RlOG); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City
of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter
described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
See attached legal description
(ANX2008-02003)
Land Use Cateqorv
Residential/Office General
(RlOG)
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent
with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7831-08.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 11
Ordinance No. 7932-08
Attachment number 4
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 7933-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET EAST OF SOUTH BELCHER
ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTH OF
NURSERY ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF
SECTION 19-29-16 IN METES AND BOUNDS 33/08,
WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2235 NURSERY
ROAD, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, AS OFFICE (0); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
See attached legal description.
(ANX2008-02003)
Zoninq District
Office (0)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7931-08.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 11
Ordinance No. 7933-08
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Low (RL) and Initial Zoning Atlas Designation of Low
Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1662 Bellrose Drive North (Lot 56, Bellrose Park, Section 23, Township 29 South,
Range 15 East); and Pass Ordinances 7934-08, 7935-08 and 7936-08 on first reading. (ANX2008-02004)
SUMMARY:
This voluntary annexation petition involves a 0.19-acre property consisting of one parcel of land occupied by a single-family
dwelling. It is located on the north side of Bellrose Drive North approximately no feet east of Lake Road. The applicant is requesting
this annexation in order to receive solid waste service from the City. The Planning Department is requesting that the O.I-acre of abutting
Bellrose Drive North right-of-way not currently within the City limits also be annexed. The property is contiguous to existing City
boundaries to the north and east. It is proposed that the property be assigned a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low
(RL) and a zoning category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the provisions of Community Development Code
Section 4-604.E:
. The applicant has paid all of the City's sewer impact and assessment fees and the City is currently providing service. Collection
of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The property is located within Police District III and service will be
administered through Police Headquarters located at 2851 North McMullen Booth Road. Fire and emergency medical services
will be provided to this property by Station 47 located at 1460 Lakeview Road. The City has adequate capacity to serve this
property with sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and EMS service. The proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect
on public facilities and their levels of service;
. The proposed annexation is consistent with and promotes the following objective of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan:
Objective 2.4: Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater
Community Development Code;
. The proposed RL Future Land Use Plan category is consistent with the current Countywide Plan designation of this
property. This designation primarily permits residential uses at a density of 5 units per acre. The proposed zoning district to be
assigned to the property is the LMDR District. The use of the subject property is consistent with the uses allowed in the District
and the property exceeds the District's minimum dimensional requirements. The proposed annexation is therefore consistent
with the Countywide Plan, City's Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code; and
Cover Memo
. The property proposed for annexation is contiguous to existing City boundaries to the north and east; therefore ~rfP~~~ion is
consistent with Florida Statutes Chapter 171.044.
Review Approval: 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 12
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 7
Location Map
Owner
James luppa
Case:
ANX2008-02004
Property Size (Acres).
0.19
Site:
1662 Bellrose Drive North
Size R-Q-W (Acres).
10
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 23-29-15-07848-000-0560
From:
RL (County)
R-2 (County)
To:
RL (City)
LMDR (City)
Atlas Page:
315B
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02004 - 1662 Bellrose Drive North - Iuppa\Maps\Location
Map.doc Item # 12
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 7
Aerial Photograph
Owner James luppa Case: ANX2008-02004
Property Size (Acres): 0.19
Site: 1662 Bellrose Drive North Size R-Q-W (Acres):
.10
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 23-29-15-07848-000-0560
From: RL (County) R-2 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) Atlas Page: 315B
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02004 - 1662 Bellrose Drive North - Iuppa\Maps\Aerial
Photograph.doc Item # 12
.. .....
:.' '.:':.'.i
:....! 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27
.. :... 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19
:: )..11 ,.. : '. . ...:: ..
iti::,i ~ @:'::]~,',:~~:,,:0~,~~ ):':1'~ i::'0:~)!@~~~:'" · ~ · ~:'~:::i~i~:i:::,:~':::ii::i,"~~:i::;::'~'",::::
::{: ',:'i~ "_. . I':'::::.";;';'~:;:;"i::.:.'(:{:'::',:,:,:::, ;:::.:W;fhft:.e:~~g~:'.'N:,:::,:'i:';:;::";';-;'::;:'i:::,;;,,"((;:::::":'i::';:;::'.;.;.;.B::;:': t-';';';':';:':i:::';:"'.',.:{?-:'i";';'.";" ;.:.;:,:i:::.;:-.'.,..;.::....:..~~'<>~:.;:;i::.;::...-.::..::.'.
:: ::.~ ':.': '.,-,:..::.::..:' :....::-..:..:1. '.">.:..:':. :.."......:.. ......: .....::.. .._.... : .'. ..... ... ......... '. .... : .-........-... ...-............;:....:.::.:._ :~:
..... ..' ..G......... '0'" ...... ."'...... .",' '.-.' .....'<1... "'- .' .:'!' .... .en., .... -\I)........ .'" ...... ...."".... ."" ...... ..,;...... ..... .... ."t<:.. -' .... ..':';..... .... ....... ... .
','::;1": :~:'~)',::t':]':::~ 'M\::i:!il~,:i:':'~~ii:i;il:,~:,;' ::i~il:i'ii~i,i',': :1~i:i:;:I:~:::,:~;,i:;:i:,~I')I::rJ;:i:i' :i~',::;:':~i:i:::,';l',::::l':(f~:',j'i:
':.:: ': :..... :''-::: ::::'.::::'-:.::':.::::: :,::,:':::::-\::'.: ::,:..-:,:.::::::.. :.:.:::::-\.::'-:=:. :'::':}::: .....::.:. ::::::::"::::':'. ':.:':: '.:;:':' :-:::::.:=::-:.::: :':: '.:;:':-::' ':::':=::-:':: :.: :: :.:;:.::'::::::. ".:::':.: :."-:-: :..:;: :";":::":" ::':.: ....:.:.. .:;::;.-'.:.:..:'::.': :':.":lL! :':.: :.:. '-.:<'.<.'.: ::.::.
':.' .... "-" .';" :1&:" ......~.j'..; :.. "ii(" ..........-;.. ....:.. ...... .......;..:.. ":-' ....... .....:i3 .-.... :..24...... '.;" ;..-.. .' ...-.......... ;" ;....-:. ...... .........;. ;.....:... ......--....;..;.. ..Q::-.... ......-..;.. ;." ":.
~::'::';:i ;t,;,:'i~,,: ,':;:~;:;t:;i[:'~:':::;::~;:':~':;i::::~;;i'::::~;:'::m;~ #;4i,ii~: ,:'::'G~:::;;::,m~: :1'mi~:;.2,:~::;:i:1:,t,~ l',~l':!?:':",:,
.:-: '.: .. ..-......:.-:.;..:.:.:.::.::::::.. :-::....... -'.:-':';'.:.:.:. ::'::::::'. :-::..........:.-:.;..:.:.:.::.. ':::::'. :-:-..........:..:.;.-:.:.:.::.wii};!iw,6iiii fiij.... -.:.:..<:.... ::.::.: '.. :.:....... ":" ;.<:....:. -.::., . .:.:-.... .: .;;-.:....:. ...:: . :...... ...: ..;..... :..:.:g -.:: .........-:..:I5J..:.:.: :.::::
'.:r" -
i;:o,-':':'.
... .....
~)::{I
:i:~::=-i'l
.. -....
;': ':'<:1
;. :~~/:~
-.:.::.
-";'!
::.::.!
:>O=!
..~
::.:.:.:.
-:..';,;
-.... !
-.:.:
::....
.:.:..:'!
-........
-..;::.
-:::..
;::::o:.i
.~
.j
'ii.j
; :.:::1
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 7
.... .... \~ ~1\6
~ NURSERY RD ~
. .. " ....... .. I" . ... ~. .. .." .. ,,~. . ... .L.:~. .. .1m::~_::;n. .... .... [~f;:~ ... ... +!,.~ 'J'
co
.... 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
I ---, 11 12 14 15 16
~8 co '" 00 '" 0 00 ~ 42910 co '" 00
0 .... .... '" '" '" '" '" ~ co co 130' 0 '" 00
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ... 00 00 00
.... .... ~ ~ ~ ~
g EDEN CT
17
'" 00
'" '"
~ ~
18
,~
~~
o
~
...
~
~
'"
'"
~
'"
~
...
'"
~
'"
~
~
...
~
'"
~
'"
~
....
~
....
~
'"
~
~
~
00
~
Proposed Annexation Map
Owner
Case:
ANX2008-02004
James luppa
Property Size (Acres):
0.19
Site:
1662 Bellrose Drive North
Size R-Q-W (Acres):
.10
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 23-29-15-07848-000-0560
From:
RL (County)
R-2 (County)
To:
RL (City)
315B
LMDR (City)
Atlas Page:
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02004 - 1662 Bellrose Drive North - Iuppa\Maps\Proposed
Annexation Map.doc Item # 12
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 7
~.:...
:,":iJI '
;. .:.<:.
: (ij
::.::.
. .::;.'j
:::,:!
..~
:.:.:.:.
};'::':!
....
.::..:'!
. :-::::'j
:.:::: f'":\
. .-'>:.1 80
'III ~
..j
: 'ii.j g
: :.:::1 a
.' ":':.: RlJ
~ ..:.1
".
. -:.i;
.: ::':::1
.:~.I.:.i I) ." I. . . . _. . .. ...
~ :::('J.: 46 8 :'.A~:. :. ':48;:-:.:: '::.:~,Q:.:..:.: 50 .:...~\ "::': '. ,.'si::: 53 <&i', .:. . :.'J:~ 57 -.: It ::,~q:::!i:~:: .:u~::::~:::}::: ::';::i?::!i::::'{.:-r',;'i::::::::':{~?:';:::i.~:;::.:::i::'.:::.:::;'\::'::.
. . ~ ttS :' :i:~:.':;.~:::::;.::i:':~: ~ ;\:;.:::::'.':~::::'.@ ~ R'B.: !' "\1>'" ';a'" '" ';,1(:::'" . .......
:.:.::.:.:.:. :;.:::.j,,:,'::.i~ U... .g.. .. . .!. '::.i:.:'.:.': :...:...~:':.:;.:i.};.\..::.:..:.,.:.::::..:.:::..:::..i::'.:8. :..:..~.....:,_:~..y.:...~:.;~.. ,.':~".:.,..:S.'..'..!3.:. :..:..p,':'::":~...:',.::.'.'N.:..",.':.:::..::.'::'':.:.':.::.:.::..:..:..:.:~::':..::.:..:;.::.;:.':.':.'.'.:,.:.:.i.'.::.:::.;:.':. :.:.:.:::::'::'::':.:.':::.10, t.: ~ ~ ..:?:":';::::.;:'i. :?'::::~i::':. ::i:~':';::::i';.':::i\Q~':.:":::"::':'~::::'::#:.!.:~:i:::::
....-= ~.'... ............. ........... ....... .... .'. ........ .... . '. ... .'." ........ ~illl!~~i~~~ii :i::':':\:/:::~:-:;):(:::::';'::.::i:.:::::::.:\:::}//:.:'.,::.:.:H&P2S:
1:Jl,.J:I~:J:!~',!~ ",~::i:!:1~.!:;'.:li::!:;[:.~:f:f~i::!::[~:.i'.:.[~!::;:J~~:i.,. .., .:~:;:::!l;J::... i~!.j:'~:):~';!'::(' ':1:::";;'
.,:: ':.: ''-: '':':.::::''::':.: ::.:::...:-.:'.:'::.,:.':.... ::::...:-:..:..,...':...:....:....:...:. '..'.:..:.............::...... .....:.::...::.... ..... .. ... .~:,;: . . '..
~;::i:.::.::;:.:.!~.;;:.!:::~:!;;.:"[:@:;;:::;;~;!.:.:~~;.;.;;;:~:.:.:;i[~;.;;I~I..i;!~:~.!::!.~~:..!::.~~; :!.!::rr:~.;!~.:~:!::[;~...:.~ .~j~ry:';':.::
.. .... .... -.... ..... .'.' ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ......... . ...6."(....
:.:ii:,1<~.i:i~.:J~::;i:]i.:i~.i~:.;J;~::i:~.i!!:~.f~;::~:;!i.~;:?~;~';j~;;~~~!i\~::l~':i~l::!~:::,,:.i~i;:rir;~:!'i!~:..~:::::i,,::I~.::.I[:!~~:;,:::
~I\
M
:~~s:~~.!j~J,::i~!~i .:"; ~~~~';'~::i; i.~~;.;~:~::i..i:.:;.~~~,:;;.:,~~li;.i;i: ':?~i,;: ,I ~:j
:'. '.-',k:..:.;::::;.::.:::: .///jp'~( ::;~~:':'::":: ....21l'::. :h:':'::,'. .ii~:L~:.:' ::::.Rl1.,~f::\...:.:::::.::.::...I...;.>::..;/.::::.::;.::::. ::.;::::.::....:.t.~.~?:~.. ....:....:......~~:~m$O'~:: ;D:::"::'~~"~' 1513
: :,' . . . ,:.::. .: :1:..:.: :".: '.: :.:0-.::,:: :' ''',.::'.:., "::'~'::" ." '.' ....;J :-'.',:: :":..,:.::., ..: '%:"':'. :,.:..,..:~.t':.::: :",:, ::. :,':..,..::., : i6: ::'-:". ':.:~'.:.:.-ii; ~.:.,~~:... ,.:.:' .:'.~. ::. 3
. '.' :,:., .. .' .. ... fil54 .". . . 'l~" '. . ~. .' . . ... '. ... .' '~2:"" "'.......... ...... . .' ...... '. '" . .'
:::.. . :' .' : . ,:.: .:' :'.. :' ;..,:" :'. "'.: .:....:.. :':' ..': . . . .:~13.:::i;..-::::...: :.:.:.:. ;::;:::.::-/(-::.;: :::'):'::.:.)~.:.:.:.:. ;::;::'.:; :~::::";:.?i:::'::,:,::" :'i:':':':' ;:i;u-i(::: (::ff-:.:~t'::::.:.:.:. ::i'.::..(<~i::::::.:..:ii:.:. .s. ;::;::;':::.~::':::':;';::':::::::f::':\:::'::: \:..
~ 1
,
NURSERY RD
I
<0
a
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
a
'"
~
'"
'"
~
8 9 10
I ---,
I ~ 4~ 18
~~~
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
4
&'j
~
~
~
1~
~
@
~
cii
~
'"
'"
~
~ g;;
~ ~
~
~
~
'"
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
"-
~
~
,y
~ ~
EDEN CT
RU
~
~
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
Future Land Use Map
Owner James luppa
Case
ANX2008-02004
Property Size (Acres):
0.19
Site
1662 Bellrose Drive North
Size R-Q-W (Acres):
10
Land Use
Zoning
PIN 23-29-15-07848-000-0560
From
RL (County)
R-2 (County)
To
RL (City)
LMDR (City)
Atlas Page
315B
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02004 - 1662 Bellrose Drive North - Iuppa\Maps\Future Land Use
Map.doc Item # 12
Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 7
I..r'
~-::
I~
\~~I\
M
':':':':.:"~i:'::' :~,;H?: ':::.:~'/:/rt~:: :::.~~:,\.':::. :":':'f524" :T:!:,\.'::: ......;:: :'. :..'~ i: (:\i:::':'::/::::'::::~~:::':::::::'.: ':-'::::.:,:.':::;:::.::-::::. ::::i:(i~~'i::.:,./::::' ,:,~::',;"::':::,:'::{~g~?:i ~;::~:.~~ 1513
:~: :.... '. :.: .::.: . ....:. :.':',:.:: :':.':.' ':.: :'.':: :." .....:: . :'" ,:.: ....:.:. ;.: ':': .,: .:~13.:::i;',-::::.'.:' :.:.:':. ;::;":.::-i(-:'.;' ii:::.::.:.)~\.:.:. ;::;::'.:; :~::::";:':::',:\'::::i. :'::\.:.:. ;:/;-.::-i:'::: (::,;:f.:.:~1:'::\.:.:. ::'::, ::'.~(::)~\?'~:::' ./::\. ,\:;:'/:-:'(::"i::::f":\:;:':'\'
b . . . ........ .. ... ... ...... ..-...... .0.".
~ 1
I
NURSERY RD
,..
..
.'
:
.'
'.
80
~
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
I ---, 11 12 14 15 16
<0 ~ ~ ~ 0 '" ~ 42910 ~ &'j ~ 1~
0 '" '" '" @ cii '"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"
~ ~ <0 <0
~ '.;............:-
17 18
~ g;;
~ ~
: 0'
f""
~
'"'
~
'"
~
'J
~ ~
::
g
.. ."...... ,T1l
LMDR
EDEN CT
~
~
~
'"
~
'"
~
~ ~
~
~
<0
~
'"
~
'"
~
36
35 34
33
32
31
30 29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20 19
II .....:..........-............
.:.A~:. ": .:' :48.':-:.:: . ,:.:~,Q:.:..:.: 50 .-:,.p.f:..... .: :'52;. ':. 53 : :'54." .:. .:~:-:.::: [j~ 58 :,:.;~{i::: \:~\/.:.":":..: ::.:. .~{i:/::" :...'..:-:.:::.~/.:. .:.::,:.:i:::':: :':..'.: :.:
~ :... o. <0 ",.. '" C'" .. . .~.:..:. .'.:.':::.,.- .:.'.: ::'" ',::'-":::..:.' :::.: :: ..:'.:::.':::.: :.-:'::
a ;'.~:.:."':::':.:'\'.~:':" ::..:..:~:.:: .;..;:.:....:::.:.:.\.~:_ ~ ~. r') ~ ;::t ~... ~ ~ . . .
.. :'.H ~ ,- .... ,- ~ ':>,::).':,..,i ::'/::/.}.; ~ ":'::'ii:'~: ~ ~ ::~..\.\:::,:'.:~.:::..~..:::..: .::i.~\.\:::.:::/:.i:::..~..:.:..::::.::.:.::...::.::::':r;:'i:::.':
. .::::.:~ g:.:'.i::.:. ::':':'.:,::; ..: ::i:.:. '. : :), : . ::. ~: ' H : :~ :~:: :.i;:: :::. :,::'::':. ':. ::.::::....::::.:. .. H ::':::.1111111:' :;;;::.:. :::i:::,::~;. :::'i:':::'::,::::;,:u::::;'u :. :::i:::,::;,. i:r::'::!": ':' ::~~~:. :::;:::::::r',:::~:::::?::
. . - . .. . . .. . - . . .. . . .. . . .. . .
... . . .... . .-. ..... . ... ... . .. .. .... .. ...... . . ....
.. .. . . .. . - .
':.':: ':: :'..:. :::'::':. ::.: :'::=::': :.: ::.'::::: .:.: :.:.:::'::':.-\.: :':: ::'::..- ::.':::: : :'.. :.:.:::'::':.-\.: :'::=:. :.: ::/:: : :'..:.::':' :'::':.:::: :':::::'::'. '='::':: :'..:,- :.:. :<.::.':::>: :.::: ,':: :'..:,- :.:-:-:: ':.':::>::':::.: :.: '.-' ::.:::'::':.: ::. /:::.: :.>: : ':::: :.:'.:',,: ::"::' ::::.: ....: ': .: .::: :.:'.:'.:' ':'..'..':.'.: ::.'#1 :',:.: ':':":":"':::'<.':': :::::.
1;!:i:"::,!::.:!~.!:! ';:,~!,.::;r:~!.::'::~'i':.!:~.:i"::.i~;.r:!:i!~i'!:t~ 1~,}:~ii!::!'~~!i::!!.8.~: :!.i:~::~!;:.~.:j:i:.mi!"i :..i(.i:~r!:'..:,
.....:..::.:: :.:.:....:.::::.::::......:.:.::.::.:..:.:.:.-..:.::::.::::......:.:.::.::.:..:.:.:....:.::::.::::....-.:.:.::.::.:-.:.:.:....:.::.:-::::...:.-.:..:.:.......:....:..::........:.............-.:.:...:........:.........:.:.:...:..:..:.......-..:...:...._:........:.:.-::.......:::.::.........::..:.:.:.......Q-::..:.:.:...-:.::~:::-.....:.:.
:,i, !!j!:,'!:'~,:::i,::i::::~!::!~',::~:,::!~i.;:j::,~,i::!~!:j~'!.'::~::;~:~l~f~~~]~r~:'\~i:ii~.!!:~:!I:~j;:[,:i::~:::::tl:~!?:,t:,:~::::::!j,!i~~::,~!::~~~!:!::.
46
Zoning Map
Owner
James luppa
Case
ANX2008-02004
Property Size (Acres):
0.19
Site
1662 Bellrose Drive North
Size R-Q-W (Acres):
10
Land Use
Zoning
PIN 23-29-15-07848-000-0560
From
RL (County)
R-2 (County)
To
RL (City)
LMDR (City)
Atlas Page
315B
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02004 - 1662 Bellrose Drive North - Iuppa\Maps\Zoning Mt~ # 12
p:.;:...
'::'/~:ri ~
:i:~:::-:.j
". .....
;': ':'<:1
: :~(::j
'.:.::.
:.;:,'.'j
.>:!
..~
::.:.:.:.
:::::.:,;!
.":.:
::....
.::.O:'!
-........
':':::.
-:::..
;::::o:.i
.~
.j
'ii.j
: :.:::.
:/" -:<::.:
~. .....1
.' :"..
.: -:.i;
:. :':",]
:::.<'i .:. : ,.." ,'. : '. '. .':m:i~ i': ....... .
.: ~ gOO" ..~.. m .."...... ..... ..' >....._..k.i..~~
: Iil!!.... .:......:I::~~:.;;;!~~:;:-:~~~~~~zi:~::.~:g~:f.~i!:,. ....~. .~~i~::ii,i~;!i::i:i!~::ii~8
.;:In!: .~:-~;.::::i-&~-.:~ '-r~::ii!:~~,:::-;-~ii:i;l:.~~-'- ::[~i:i;;:~~i-j';- ;i*i;;:::;i:~:',~~';:Ji)~iii:~j::i;,: ~i".;:~:-l~i;'::;-':i.;:::ii-l;=:!~i:;
':':: ,: :'..:. :': :<. ::::':>'::'::':'::',: ,:::,:,'::<:'::::':: ::'::',-:':,::',::,.. :.:..::<.:::::':> :'::':.:\:~. ngJ~:'_J:~'':' [.un:.. ,:: : '. ':.:. .. . '.(.: 1'1:::.::. ',': :..:':. '.:.:.: :.-.::. ::::.: .:: :.: :::.:.:.: .:..'.....'.: :'JL!:'..:: '::::',:':':::.':':.'.::--
1:::i::'::-l::-:!;-:::-;i~;--:;:r:i:-:i'::~:';':~-:i-::_:~:-r:;:i;;i-:;t~ 1~,}:~i;::::-~~;i::;:-8~: ::-;i~:i-':-~.:~:;i-mil'i ;-.i(-;;[~i;'-.:,
.....:..::.:: :.:.:....:.::::.::::......:.:.::.::.:..:.:.:.-..:.::::.::::......:.:.::.::.:..:.:.:....:.::::.::::....-.:.:.::.::.:-.:.:.:....:.::.:.::::...:...:..:.:.......:....:..::........:...............:.:...:........:.........:.:.:...:.:...:..........:...:.....:........::...::.......:::.::.........::..:.:.:.......Q.::..:.:.:....:.::~:::......:.:.
:.:: iijl:f-'::.~:::'i.:::i;::~:!::~iii'~:.:::~ii;!j:l,I::~ii.'~:~:I~lri~~:~~;:~.~;:~j;i,:i::~:::::,';::~i!:i:,~:.:~:::::::j,:;~~::.~i::~~t;:i"i:,
.' . .:6f:- ..... u . '. '.' ...... u . . . . '.' '.-. ."1 . - . .'.' '.. .' u ..... -' '.. .' u ...... ..... u .. .'. u' . ..' u .' .'. u' .... .' u . . .'. .. . .... .' . . . . .' . u' ...... - . .
+- i :O:ff:::~\:..': :::...:. ;:i~':.:;:::::i : /::.::.':::\:::.': :::.:' ;'/~ ,:.:;.i::::: :;: .::.::.::::\:::.':~ :::':':'::'. :.::.i::::: :;::-:: ::. .:::: ::::.': :::.:.:' :'/, :::.:.:::::: ::::": ::::. :: ::':': ;:::.:. (i,,:-,; ::,..::: ~::;": ::::.:::. .:': ;:::.:. ::",=:-';.:. ,..::: ::';":.::::': \:.: . ;:::.:. {"";-':.:.:; :: :;':-::.::.::" ::":::.'::;: :. {";';-':':::.:::::-::.::.\ ::.':::.'::{::. :':' ':-';-'W:;'i: :.\ i":::.'::{::' :':';,;.:;-'::;'
Attachment number 1
Page 6 of 7
\~~I\
7'17
--.~~ ~ ~'1~
~~:..~:_:~:!::j;lir-:~j~l~i,:r~~~lrl;~]lt-]~1.;f ~jl ;;;~~:-'i-;: -;-:::,~ - i ~:j
<'::::'::~~':':'>~'.:: " ;.:;':: ::.:. ''-:':: .':.:.': ;-:.... :.'.'. :;::::: :. .'. .' ':: ::'~WAl'i::"'~~:'" .. .".l'~ :.:.. :~1lll' U":.:-'-:::.::i';;'::::'::.:.,. f:.:.:-,-::.: : :':i5::~:;' 1507
'.'- .... ........,:. .... .......... ...., .il....... '.' ..........;:iJI;. ....... .. ....:l:.. .. ...... ~1lI
:'::ir~:T.:::i::i:'::: '~.\):A~~:~ :j~::i:::') i:~1:;',i:t:. ::h::ii:.: t.%~:L\::;-~;i ':::ii:.\imt.::.:::::.:.:.'::i:':.:;::::::i::::::::;'i:\:;:.:::::: i:':::i:::':i:::t".:.~r;.::.::::..:::::::i':.:.::;:.~~~~~:: i:i'::'~.:1~J~.. 151.3
.' ...... ...1.... .u.!".... "'!'J"u ...... ... ..0.... ...... ....;J..u ...... ..~... ..... .... '. 'u' ..... 'Il>' .'. .u.~ ... .... .~_.. . ..
~ 1
NURSERY RD
2 3 4
~0 co '" 00
'" .... ....
~ ~ ~
g
... ~
'" ~ .... ....
~ ~ ~
36 35 34 33
5 ~ ing e FM 1~'1 0 Y 9~ es;- enHal
'" '" 00 '" 4291'" co '" 00
'" '" ~ ,... '" '" co co
co co - ~~~ co co
.,... .,... .,... .,... .,... .,... .,... .,...
00
00
~
14
15
16
17
'" 00
'" '"
~ ~
18
130-
...
~
'"
00
~
'"
00
~
,y
coco
.... ....
EDEN CT
.... '" '" .... ... ~ '" '^ '" ~
'" ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00
~ ~ ~
SOnll Famil Rt sid nti III
32 1? 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21
20
19
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner James luppa
Case
ANX2008-02004
Property Size (Acres):
0.19
Site
1662 Bellrose Drive North
Size R-Q-W (Acres):
10
Land Use
Zoning
PIN 23-29-15-07848-000-0560
From
RL (County)
R-2 (County)
To
RL (City)
315B
LMDR (City)
Atlas Page
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2008\ANX2008-02004 - 1662 Bellrose Drive North - Iuppa\Maps\Existing
Surrounding Uses Map.doc Item # 12
View looking north at the subject property, 1662 Bellrose Drive
North
View looking west of 1662 Bellrose Drive North along
Bellrose Drive North
Attachment number 1
Page 7 of 7
View looking south of the subject property, 1662 Bellrose Drive
North
View looking east of 1662 Bellrose Drive North along Bellrose
Drive North
View looking northwest at the property to the west of the
subject property, 1662 Bellrose Drive North
View looking northeast at the property to the east of the subject
property, 1662 Bellrose Drive North
ANX2008-02004
James Iuppa
1662 Bellrose Drive North
Item # 12
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO, 7934-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF BELLROSE DRIVE NORTH APPROXIMATELY
720 FEET EAST OF LAKE AVENUE CONSISTING OF LOT 56,
BELLROSE PARK, TOGETHER WITH THE ABUTTING RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF BELLROSE DRIVE NORTH, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 1662 BELLROSE DRIVE NORTH, INTO THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE
BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION;
PROVI 01 NG AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WH EREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the
City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
Lot 56, Bellrose Park, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 59, Page
63, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with the abutting right-of-
way of Bellrose Drive North
(ANX2008-02004)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent
with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby accepts the dedication
of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public, which have heretofore
been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk
and the Planning Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the
official maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk
shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after
adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after
adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 12
Ordinance No. 7934-08
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO, 7935-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE
LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF BELLROSE DRIVE NORTH APPROXIMATELY
720 FEET EAST OF LAKE AVENUE CONSISTING OF LOT 56,
BELLROSE PARK, TOGETHER WITH THE ABUTTING RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF BELLROSE DRIVE NORTH, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1662 BELLROSE DRIVE NORTH, UPON
ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS
RESIDENTIAL LOW (RL) PROVI 01 NG AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive
plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate,
and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of
Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described
property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
Lot 56, Bellrose Park, according to the plat
thereof recorded in Plat Book 59, Page 63, Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with
the abutting right-of- way of Bellrose Drive North
(ANX2008-02004)
Land Use CateQorv
Residential Low (RL)
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with
the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7934-08.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 12
Ordinance No. 7935-08
Attachment number 4
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 7936-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF BELLROSE DRIVE NORTH APPROXIMATELY
720 FEET EAST OF LAKE AVENUE CONSISTING OF LOT
56, BELLROSE PARK, TOGETHER WITH THE ABUTTING
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BELLROSE DRIVE NORTH, WHOSE
POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1662 BELLROSE DRIVE
NORTH, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(LMDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
Lot 56, Bellrose Park, according to the plat
thereof recorded in Plat Book 59, Page 63, Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with
the abutting right-of- way of Bellrose Drive North
(ANX2008-02004 )
Zoninq District
Low Medium Density
Residential
(LMDR)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7934-08.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 12
Ordinance No. 7936-08
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan related to the Coastal High Hazard Area provisions of the Coastal
Management Element and Pass Ordinance 7917-08 on first reading.
SUMMARY:
The proposed text amendments to the Coastal Management Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan are necessitated by the
passage ofHB1359 (Chapter 2006 -68, Laws of Florida), which made a number of changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and to 9J-
5.012 F.A.C. This law requires a change in the definition of Coastal High Hazard Area as well as adoption of a Level of Service (LOS)
for evacuation clearance times for a Category 5 storm event. In addition to these requirements, the Planning Department is also
recommending the adoption of a Coastal Storm Area (CSA). The CSA includes, in addition to the CHHA, those areas that are not in the
CHHA, but can be reached or evacuated only by going through a CHHA, as well as areas where high concentrations of development
and population are not appropriate due to safety concerns. The CSA recognizes the unique circumstances existing in the coastal areas of
Pinellas County, and ensures proper evacuation. The CSA is a larger area than the CHHA, but to be concurrent with the County
Comprehensive Plan, consistent with the Countywide Rules and for safety concerns, the Coastal Storm Area terminology is
recommended.
The Planning Department and Emergency Management staff are recommending language that would prohibit the siting of hospitals,
nursing homes and assisted living facilities in the CSA. Since the City must follow County Emergency Management directives, these
text amendments are intended to be consistent with language in the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. The recommended
amendments were developed in consultation with the Clearwater Citizen's Advisory Committee, Tampa Bay Regional Planning
Commission, Pinellas County and Pinellas Planning Council.
The Planning Department has determined that the proposed text amendments are consistent with other provisions of the Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan, will not adversely impact the use of property, will adversely affect neither the natural environment nor public
facilities. Please refer to the report (CP A2007 -06004) for the complete staff analysis.
The Community Development Board reviewed these amendments at its public hearing on February 19,2008, and unanimously
recommended approval, with the following condition: that a specific time to implement the 36 hour LOS is identified prior to
implementation of this amendment. Since the time of that public hearing, Planning Staff has been in contact with Pinellas County
Planning Staff. Pinellas County Planning Staff has now been informed by the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA) that
DCA is going to raise objections on every community across the state that does not adopt, at a minimum, a 16 hour Evacuation LOS,
and have, in fact, already objected to St. Petersburg's adoption of an LOS of 36 hours. County Planning Staff indicated that in view of
their conversation with DCA, the County is in the process of amending their Evacuation LOS to 16 hours. City Planning staff has not
recommended a specific time to implement an Evacuation LOS due to the fact that numerical estimates for achieving an Evacuation
LOS of 16 hours have not yet been developed, although discussions with staff from various agencies have an estimated range from 50-
100 years.
Because this is a text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is
required.
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 13
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 7917-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, MAKING
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY AS
ADOPTED ON MAY 18, 2000 AND AMENDED ON JULY 12, 2001,
OCTOBER 7, 2004, OCTOBER 20, 2005, DECEMBER 15, 2005, AND
AUGUST 14, 2007, BY AMENDING THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ELEMENT; AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF COASTAL HIGH
HAZARD AREA; PROVIDING A METHOD FOR HANDLING PARCELS
WHERE A PORTION OF THE PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
COASTAL STORM AREA; DELETING CURRENT POLICY 22.2.2;
PROHIBITING THE LOCATION OF NEW, OR EXPANSION OF
EXISTING HOSPITALS, NURSING HOMES, AND ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITIES WITHIN THE COASTAL STORM AREA AND THE AREA
INUNDATED BY A CATEGORY 3 HURRICANE AS DEPICTED BY THE
SLOSH MODEL; PROVIDING FOR COOPERATION WITH PINELLAS
COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TOWARD REDUCING THE
OUT-OF-COUNTY HURRICANE EVACUATION CLEARANCE TIME;
ADOPTING A LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD FOR OUT-OF-
COUNTY HURRICANE EVACUATION CLEARANCE TIME FOR A
CATEGORY 5 STORM EVENT; RENUMBERING SOME OBJECTIVES
AND POLICIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the City
of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City, and to adopt and
periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and portions thereof; and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater adopted a Comprehensive Plan on May 18, 2000
by Ordinance Number 6522-00; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance Number 6794-01, which amended
the Comprehensive Plan of the City on July 12, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance Number 7295-04, which amended
the Comprehensive Plan of the City on October 7,2004; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance Number 7388-05, which
amended the Comprehensive Plan of the City on October 20, 2005 and December 15,
2005; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance Number 7782-07, which amended
the Comprehensive Plan of the City on August 14, 2007; and
Ordinance No.ltatv#l8l3
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, certain amendments are statutorily required, and others are advisable
in order to harmonize the Comprehensive Plan with state law and good planning practice;
and
WHEREAS, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City have been
prepared in accordance with the applicable requirements of law, after conducting the
appropriate planning analysis, and public participation through public hearings, opportunity
for written comments, open discussion and the consideration of public and official
comments; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Board, serving as the designated Local
Planning Agency for the City, has held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and
has recommended adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been transmitted to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs for review and comments, and the objections,
recommendations and comments received from the Florida Department of Community
Affairs have been considered by the City Council, together with all comments from local
regional agencies and other persons, in preparing the final draft of the amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt the
amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to reflect
changing conditions; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Amendments 1 - 5 to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby adopted.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, provision, clause, phrase, or application
of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason by a court
of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall be deemed severable
therefrom and shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of
Community Affairs (DCA) issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to
be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining
the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3177,
163.3178,163.3184,163.3187 or 163.3189, F.S., as amended.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
2
Ordinance No.ltatv#l8l3
Approved as to form:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 3
Frank Hibbard
Mayor-Councilmember
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
3
Ordinance No.ltatv#l8l3
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 4
CDB Meeting Date:
Case #
Ordinance #:
Agenda Item:
February 19,2008
CP Al007 -06004
7917-08
E-2
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
REQUEST:
Cleanvater Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments to the
Coastal Management Element
INITIATED BY:
City of Clearwater Planning Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
HB1359 (Chapter 2006 -68, Laws of Florida) made a number of changes to Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes and to 9J-5.012 F.A.C. regarding the required Coastal Management
Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The law requires a change in the definition of
Coastal High Hazard Area as well as adoption of a Level of Service (LOS) for evacuation
clearance times for a Category 5 storm event. These changes must be adopted by
July I, 2008. In addition to these requirements, the Planning Department is also
recommending the adoption of a "Coastal Storm Area"(CSA). This recommendation is
based upon obj ectives and policies developed in consultation with the Citizen's Advisory
Committee, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Commission, Pinellas County and Pinellas
Planning Council. The Planning Department is also recommending language
recommended by Emergency Management regarding siting of hospitals, nursing homes
and assisted living facilities. The proposed amendments were presented to the Citizen's
Advisory Committee (CAC) on February 6,2008. CAC meeting notes are attached.
ANALYSIS:
A total of five amendments are proposed to the text of the Clearwater Comprehensive
Plan in Ordinance No. 7917-08. This text amendment is considered a large scale plan
amendment and requires review and approval by the Florida Department of Community
Affairs.
Please find a summary of each amendment below.
1. Amendment I - Amend Obiective 22.2 of Goal 22 (see page I of Exhibit A):
This amendment ensures compliance with HB 1359 by amending the definition of
C:\Program Files\Neevia. Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert. 5849 .1. Staff
ReportForCDBCP A2007 -06004.doc
Page - I
Item # 13
Attachment number 2
Page 2 of 4
Coastal High Hazard Area to "the Sea,Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes
(SLOSH) model to be inundated from a category one hurricane, as reflected in the
most recent Regional Evacuation Study, Storm Tide Atlas." In addition, the Planning
Department is also recommending the adoption of a "Coastal Storm Area"(CSA).
This recommendation is based upon consultation with Tampa Bay Regional Planning
Commission (TBRPC), Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) and Pinellas County
Planning Department. Due to the unique circumstances existing in the coastal areas of
Pinellas County, the term "Coastal Storm Area" is important because it makes
evacuation from the Coastal High Hazard Area possible. The Coastal Storm Area
includes, in addition to the CHHA, those areas that are not in the CHHA, but can only
be reached or evacuated by going through a CHHA, as well as areas where high
concentrations of development and population are not appropriate due to safety
concerns. The Coastal Storm Area is a larger area than the CHHA, but to be
concurrent with the County Comprehensive Plan, consistent with the Countywide
Rules and for safety concerns the "Coastal Storm Area" terminology is
recommended.
2. Amendment 2 - Add new Policy 22.2.1 of Goal 22 (see page I of Exhibit A):
This addition provides guidance as to how land development would be handled on
parcels of land that are split by the coastal storm area boundary. This policy is
comparable to the approach taken by Pinellas County Emergency Management in
identifying hurricane evacuation levels and is concurrent with language found in the
Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. It also takes into consideration the unique
bluff area. Along the bluffs there are a number of parcels, that although more than
20% of a parcel may be in the coastal storm area, the property quickly rises so that the
remainder of the parcel is not impacted by storm surge from any hurricane regardless
of its magnitude. While only a few parcels are affected, it makes sense to not include
the portion of a parcel on the top of the bluff in the coastal storm area if it would not
be inundated by storm surge under any storm scenario.
3. Amendment 3 - Amend Policy 22.2.1 and remove Policy 22.2.2 (see page 2 of
Exhibit A):
This amendment renumbers former 22.2.1 to 22.2.2 due to the addition of a new
policy 22.2.1 above. It also changes FEMA to the correct acronym. Former 22.2.2 is
deleted because it is no longer necessary because of the new definition included in
Objective 22.2 above.
4. Amendment 4 - Add Policy 22.2.6 (see page 2 of Exhibit A):
This amendment prohibits the location of new, or expansion of existing hospitals,
nursing homes, and assisted living facilities within the coastal storm area and the area
inundated by a category 3 hurricane as depicted by the S'LOSH model, as reflected in
the most recent Regional Evacuation Study, Storm Tide Atlas The policy direction of
this amendment is consistent with the evacuation and emergency management
C:\Program Files\Neevia. Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert. 5849 .1. Staff
ReportForCDBCP A2007 -06004.doc
Page - 2
Item # 13
Attachment number 2
Page 3 of 4
planning direction of Pinellas County, is concurrent with language in the County
Comprehensive Plan, and is recommended by Clearwater Emergency Management
Director, Robert Dube.
5. Amendment 5 - Add Policies 24.3.8 and 24.3.9 (see page 3 of Exhibit A):
Policy 24.3.8 states that the City shall cooperate with Pinellas County Emergency
Management toward reducing the out-of-county hurricane evacuation clearance time
of 55 hours, recognizes the best available data regarding evacuation clearance times,
and notes that evacuation times as provided in the Regional Study findings are not an
acceptable level of service.
Policy 24.3.9 adopts a Level of Service (LOS) for evacuation in order to implement
HB 1359. It is felt by emergency management staff that 36 hours represents a point
at which a confident warning could be issued by the National Hurricane Center and a
reasonable public response could be expected. It is not anticipated that any evacuation
orders would be issued earlier than 36 hours due to the uncertainty of predicting
accurate tracks of hurricanes at timeframes exceeding 36 hours. This policy
recognizes the City and County commitment to improving the standard of service.
This LOS standard has been recommended by emergency management officials at the
Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Pinellas County, and the City of Clearwater.
It is critical that an LOS be established because HB 1359 has a "default" clause
that stipulates clearance time of 12 hours unless another LOS is adopted. A 12 hour
LOS is impossible in Pinellas County, so emergency management officials have
recommended 36 hours.
STANDARDS FOR REVIEW
Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603(F) no amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:
I. The amendment will further implementation of the Comprehensive Plan
consistent with the goals, policies and obiectives contained in the plan.
The proposed amendments to the Coastal Management Element of the Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan further refine the City's existing policies and obj ectives. The
proposed amendments are consistent with the existing goals, policies and objectives
contained in the plan and actually expand the city's long range planning policies
related to the maintenance and preservation of coastal areas in the City in general.
2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan and expand the City's ability to maintain and protect coastal areas.
C:\Program Files\Neevia. Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert. 5849 .1. Staff
ReportForCDBCP A2007 -06004.doc
Page - 3
Item # 13
Attachment number 2
Page 4 of 4
3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate
to the property in questions and compatible with existing and planned uses in the
area.
The proposed amendments are text amendments that are not directly related to a
specific property.
4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property.
The proposed amendments are text amendments that are not directly related to a
specific property.
5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment.
The proposed amendments seek to preserve, maintain and enhance the natural
environment by providing good coastal management policies.
6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate
area.
The proposed amendments are text amendments that are not directly related to a
specific property.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan make the plan
compliant with state statutes. These amendments also consider safety issues and make
Clearwater Emergency Management policies more consistent with the direction taken by
Pinellas County Emergency Management.
The Planning Department Staff recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 7917-08
that amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Catherine W. Porter, AICP
Long Range Planning Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance No. 7917-08
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 7917-08
CAC Meeting Notes
C:\Program Files\Neevia. Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert. 5849 .1. Staff
ReportForCDBCP A2007 -06004.doc
Page - 4
Item # 13
Attachment numb r 3
Page 1 of 1
II
~ ~
<= ,.
2m'"
zm~
C",lf-:t> (")
Of;;ril=:O
~;!::]J ~~
~]JCJlz~
~~~cg~
ch;~~o
~~~~~
m~::tICJl>
~~~~~
,,~~
~{ ~
"i 0
-< -
>
ill
i~
"
w
~
~
o
w
S
~
~
Attachment number 4
Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT A -1
ATTACHMENT TO ORDINANCE 7917-08
AMENDMENT 1 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS,
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Amendfollowing Objective 22.2 of Goal 22 of the Plan on page E-2 asfollows:
* * * * *
22.2 Objective - The coastal high hazard storm area includes areas that have
experienced severe damage or are scientifically predicted to experience damage
from storm surge, '.'laves and erosion. shall be the area delineated in
Map 13-8 of the Coastal Management Element, which encompasses all of the
following:
(I) the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), which shall be defined by the
Sea,Lake and Overland Surszes from Hurricanes (SLOSH) model to be
inundated from a category one hurricane, as reflected in the most recent
Reszional Evacuation Stud v, Storm Tide Atlas,
(2) all land connected to the mainland of Clearwater by bridges or
causeways,
(3) those isolated areas that are defined by the SLOSH model to be
inundated by a category two hurricane or above and that are surrounded by
the CHHA or by the CHHA and a body of water, and
(4) all land located within the Velocity Zone as designated by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
The City shall direct permanent population concentrations away from known or
predicted coastal high hazard areas consistent with the goals, objectives and policies
of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
* * * * *
AMENDMENT 2 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS,
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Add new following Policy 22.2.1 of Goal 22 of the Plan on page E-2 as follows:
* * * * *
Policies
22.2.1 If 20% or more of a parcel of land is located within the coastal storm area,
then the entire parcel shall be considered within the coastal storm area,
with the exception of specific parcels located on the bluffs of Clearwater
Harbor that the City has identified in Map 13-8 of the Comprehensive Plan.
I Exhibit A Ordinance No. 7911Mffi # 13
Attachment number 4
Page 2 of 3
However, if either a parcel of land or a group of parcels that are part of a
master development plan is equal to or greater than 5 acres and less than
50% of the parcel or group of parcels is within the coastal storm area, the
property owner may elect to provide a survey of the parcel or parcels to
determine the exact location of the coastal storm area.
* * * * *
AMENDMENT 3 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS,
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Amend Policy 22.2.1 and remove Policy 22.2.2 of Goal 22 of the Plan on page E-2 as
follows:
* * * * *
Policies
~
22.2.2 Clearwater shall continue hazard mitigation by participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) Community Rating
System, Pinellas County's Local Mitigation Strategy, administration
of building and rebuilding regulations consistent with City and
FEMA F.E.JVL^1. regulations, prohibition of beach sand dune
alteration, and restriction of development in flood plains.
22.2.2
The City shall designate the coastal high hazard area as the
€'/acuation level "N' zone for a Catel,::;orv I hurricane as delineated
by Pinellas County.
* * * * *
AMENDMENT 4 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS,
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Add Policy 22.2.5 of Goal 22 on page E-6 as follows:
* * * * *
Policies
22.2.5
The City shall prohibit the location of new, or expansion of
area and the area inundated by a category 3 hurricane as depicted
by the SLOSH model, as reflected in the most recent Regional
Evacuation Study, Storm Tide Atlas.
* * * * *
2 Exhibit A Ordinance No. 7911Mffi # 13
Attachment number 4
Page 3 of 3
AMENDMENT 5 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS,
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Add Policies 24.3.4 and 24.3.5 of Goal 24 on page E-8 as follows:
Policies
24.3.4
The City shall cooperate with Pinellas County Emergency
Management toward reducing the out-of-county hurricane
evacuation clearance time of 55 hours in 2006, as determined in
the Tampa Bay Reszion Hurricane Evacuation Study 2006, for a
category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale.
24.3.5
The adopted level of service standard for out-of-county hurricane
evacuation clearance time for a category 5 storm event as
measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale shall be 36 hours.
* * * *
3 Exhibit A Ordinance No. 7911Mffi # 13
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve amendments to the Future Land Use Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan related to the adoption of alternative
density and intensity standards for overnight accommodations, and the addition of an objective and policies pertaining to tourism, and
Pass Ordinance 7924-0S on first reading.
SUMMARY:
The Planning Department is recommending amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan that would adopt alternative density
and intensity standards for overnight accommodations consistent with the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide
Future Land Use Plan (AKA Countywide Plan Rules) as recently amended by the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA).
In addition to the adoption of these alternative standards, the proposed amendment would also establish Objective 2.6 and supporting
Policies 2.6.1, 2.6.2 and 2.6.3. The objective and policies identify tourism as a substantial element of the City's economic base and
states the need to support, maintain and enhance this economic sector, as well as encouraging the development and redevelopment of
overnight accommodations and the adoption of higher densities and intensities that would support such development.
The staff report is provided and Ordinance 7924-0S, which contains further analysis and information on the proposed amendment.
The Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed the proposed amendments at its public hearing of March IS, 200S, and
recommended approval. At the City Council meeting of March 20, 200S, the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments were
continued to the meeting of April 17 , 200S, in conjunction with associated amendments to Beach by Design and the Community
Development Code (TA200S-0l001).
As this is a text amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community
Affairs is required.
Review Approval: 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 14
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7924-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, MAKING
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY AS
ADOPTED ON MAY 18, 2000, AND AS SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED,
BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY ADDING AN
OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES PERTAINING TO TOURISM; ADOPTING
ALTERNATIVE DENSITIES AND INTENSITIES FOR OVERNIGHT
ACCOMMODATIONS IN THE RESORT FACILITIES HIGH (RFH),
RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE/RETAIL (R/O/R), COMMERCIAL LIMITED (CL),
AND COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG) LAND USE MAP CATEGORIES
CONSISTENT WITH THE "RULES CONCERNING THE
ADMINISTRATION OF THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN";
BY ADDING OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS AS A PRIMARY USE IN
THE INDUSTRIAL LIMITED (IL) LAND USE MAP CATEGORY AND
ESTABLISHING BASE AND ALTERNATIVE DENSITIES FOR SUCH
USE CONSISTENT WITH THE "RULES CONCERNING THE
ADMINISTRATION OF THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN";
DELETING THE RESORT FACILITIES OVERLAY (RFO) FUTURE LAND
USE AS A FUTURE LAND USE MAP CATEGORY; TO MODIFY THE
ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO IN THE COMMERCIAL
GENERAL FUTURE LAND USE MAP CATEGORY CONSISTENT WITH
THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED BY THE "RULES CONCERNING THE
ADMINISTRATION OF THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN";
AND MAKING MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE;
WHEREAS the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the
City of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City, and to
adopt and periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and
portions thereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance Numbers 6794-01, 7295-04,
7388-05, and 7782-07 which amended the Comprehensive Plan of the City on July 12,
2001, October 7,2004, October 20,2005, and August 14, 2007, respectively; and
WHEREAS, tourism is a major contributor to the economic health of the City
overall and the City desires to support the tourism industry; and
WHEREAS, increases in overnight accommodation density do not result in
permanent population increases; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, has
amended the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use
Plan", via Pinellas County Ordinance No. 07-50, to provide for alternative density and
intensity standards for the overnight accommodation use; and
Ordinance No.l~#l8l4
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 2
WHEREAS, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City have been
prepared in accordance with the applicable requirements of law, after conducting the
appropriate planning analysis, and public participation through public hearings,
opportunity for written comments, open discussion and the consideration of public and
official comments; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Board, serving as the designated
Local Planning Agency for the City, has held a public hearing on the proposed
amendments and has recommended adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendments; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been transmitted to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs for review and comments, and the objections,
recommendations and comments received from the Florida Department of Community
Affairs have been considered by the City Council, together with all comments from local
regional agencies and other persons, in preparing the final draft of the amendments;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt
the amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to
reflect changing conditions; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Amendments 1 - 2 to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby adopted.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of
Community Affairs (DCA) issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to
be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining
the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3184,
163.3187, or 163.3189, F.S., as amended.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank Hibbard
Mayor-Councilmember
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Ordinance No. 7924-08
Item # 14
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 5
EXHIBIT A
ATTACHMENT TO ORDINANCE 7924-08
AMENDMENT 1 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES
Add Objective 2.6 and Policies 2.6.1 through 2.6.3 of Goal 2 of the Plan starting from page A-
7 asfollows:
* * * * *
2.6 Objective - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as
such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of
this important economic sector.
Policies
2.6.1 The City supports and encourages the continued development and
redevelopment of overnight accommodation uses.
2.6.2 The City supports the adoption of higher density/intensity standards for
overnight accommodation uses such that a sufficient supply shall be
available within the City provided that concurrency standards are met.
2.6.3 The City shall continue to work with the Clearwater Beach Chamber of
Commerce, Clearwater Regional Chamber of Commerce, and the Tourist
Development Council to promote Clearwater as a tourist destination.
* * * * *
AMENDMENT 2 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES
Amend Policy 3.2.1 on pages A-9, A-10 and A-11 as follows:
* * * * *
Ord. No. 7924-08, EHam 'fA'14
Attachment number 2
Page 2 of 5
~ ~
p:: p::
rfJ ~ ~
Eo-< :t:::
U ~
~ .....:l 82 p::
Eo-< .0 ~ ]~ ~ ~ ~
~ 2 2'B p::
rfJ p:: 000
.... .::'-' CI
~ CI CI CI v ~~ 0
.....:l .....:l .....:l:'S! :::r:: I
~ .~ .~ '-' "'1'
'-' '-' '-' CJ) ~ ~ C'l
Z ~ ~ ...... v ~ 0\
. ;s p:: p:: v
.... oE oE "d 'B r--
z ~ o'(jj 0
S v v v ..... ..... v v
:'S! :'S! "d CJ) ~p:: :'S! Z
..... .:: CJ)
CJ) CJ) CJ) V vo v~ "E
Eo-< ~ ~ ~CI CI ..... P::u
Z oS .ooi 0
~ 0 0
Eo-< .~ .~ ..... ;::l ~.....
~~ E-< CJ).....
rfJ '-'58
.... v v v v '(jjCl~
rfJ CI CI CI::8
z ~ ~ ~ ~ 'S ~
0 0 0 0 0 o ..... 0
U .....:l .....:l .....:l.....:l E-<:::r::u
z
-<
~
~
~
~
~
~
Eo-<
....
rfJ
Z
~
Eo-<
Z
....
--
~
U
<c
.....
v
p.,
'S
~
N
v
~
CI
~
Eo-<
....
rfJ~
z~
~o
~~
~~
~~
......
~
~~
rfJ ~ '^
~ 0......
~~~
..... ~ v
~Eo-<CI~
~ ~ ~'B
~Z.....:l~
':':l -< O'(jj
r;l:i ~ v v
~dl.. > p::
z
o
....
Eo-<
-<
U
....
~
....
rfJ
rfJ
-<
~
u
z
j
~
~
~
.....
v
p.,
CJ)
'S
~
N
v
~
CI
If)
C'l
~
'B
v
:'S!
CJ)
v
p::
o
.~
v
CI
~
o
.....:l
~
CJ)
~
~
'B
v
"d
'0 ~
p::
~
U
<c
.....
v
p.,
CJ)
'S
~
N
v
~
CI
If)
~
'B
v
:'S!
CJ)
v
p::
o
.~
v
CI
~
o
.....:l
~
~
.....
v
p.,
CJ)
'S
~
N
v
~
CI
If)
r--
~
U
<c
.....
v
p.,
CJ)
'S
~
N
v
~
CI
o
......
.q
CJ)
.::
v
CI
~~
j 'B
8~
.e ~
~p::
o
.~
v
CI
~ ~
v i:E
'8~.8~
::8';:j ~'B
o 5 ..... v
....... "d v "d
~ '(jj "d '(jj
o2.g2
.....:l.....~.....
.::
ro
.e
~
~
'B
v
"d~
'(jj ~
vp::
p::,-,
@
~
v S
::8 ;::l
~ ~
o v
.....:l ::8
~ ~
'B 'B
~::8~
~ ~ ~
p:: p::
~
U
<c
.....
v
p.,
CJ)
's
~
N
v
~
CI
If)
......
If)
0\
p::
rfJ
......
C'l
......
~
~
~ ~
U U
<c <c
..... .....
v v
p., p.,
CJ) CJ)
's 's
~ ~
N ]
Q) Q)
~ ~
CI CI
o 0
M M
~
oE
v
:'S!
CJ)
~
o
.~
v
CI
~
i:E
~
01)
's CJ)
v .::
o6'~
..... ~ "d
~ ';:j o~
v .::
CI v
..c:::'S!o
OI)CJ)U
.~ CJ u
:::r::P::<c
..c::
01)
i:E
CJ)
v
~
'0
ro
~
~~
~~
P::,-,
C'l
Item # 14
Attachment number 2
Page 3 of 5
~
:t:::
P:: 2' ~
~ ~ ~
'.-' 000
c; c; 0
I
oE oE "'1'
C'l
v V 0\
:'Sl :'Sl t-
oo 00 0
..... ~ ~
00 Z
.::
v ;"::c ~ ~ "E
CI .~ ~ u..... u u
S CI '.-'~ '.-' '.-' 0
. 0 ;::l ;..::8 '.-' .0 c; 8 ~ c;
.::
o~ 0 ~ o'g @ 8 0 'go
'.-'v'.-'@ 0 '.-' V ~ V '.-'
v::S v ~ 8 ~ ..... v ~~
u u .~ ~ u
!.,::i~!.,::i"d !.,::i "d !.,::i
030:2 0 o 0 v 0 0 80
CI u::S u
P:: P::
If) rJl rJl
If) .:: ...... 0 ......
r-: r-: ro 0 ~ If)
P:: p:; "'1': "'1':
P:: ~ P::
rJl rJl ~ rJl ~
...... ...... a ......
0
"'1': 0 0.. ~ 0 ~
'r: 0 "'1':
v
~ ~ ~ ~
"d
~ ~ ~ ~
~o ~ "d ~ ~
~ v
u :> u u
<C 8 <C <C
..... ..... ..... .....
v v 0.. v v
p., p., g. p., p.,
00
'2 00 00 00 M
...... .s ...... ......
'S 'S 'S
~ ~ .S ~ ~
] ] ..c:: ] ]
~
v v c.S v v
~ ~ ...... ~ ~
CI CI v CI CI
00
If) If) 00 00 0
t- ...... <C ...... ......
v
u
!.,::i
4-i
cQ
..... c;
~ '.0
v .::
CI v
"d
~ '(jj
o v
.....:lP::
00
'8 ~
t) ~
~0~~3
8 .~ ...... 8 p.,
C!.,::i~.go........
..... 4-i " .::
~OOP;< ~v
8 ~ ~O's.S S
'.0 '.0 v "d 0
S .:: .:: ~ v v
;::l v v u '(;j :>
..... "d "d ..... u v
~ oc;j oc;j :0 .~ ~
v v v ;::l "d v
::s P:: P:: p., . S P::
v
v u
u .....
..... ~
~ V
OrJl
~
o
00
.....
v
p.,
......~
..c:: 0
01)00
's ~
vp.,
6 ~o
. ~.9
;;:::~
-S"d
~ 0
Vo ~ 8
.~ 80E
~ u v
O<CrJl
. 0 00
.:...," .:: v
...... '8 .9 .~
.;S 'V '(;j ~
~p::"dv
v.oOrJl
"d v S 00
.~ U S rJJ
C'ns 0 ~
P:: 0 8'(jj
~o.oro;::l
'.0 ~ ~ Q3
.:: ~ 01)......
v ro ..:: ~
"d:> I:: 0
'(jj'S v 00
v O"? .....
p::~o&
......
'B
~
......
u
'S
00
i5
00
00
.13
00
;::l
o:l
......
EO'
'::o:l
a2,
"d
o
,g
.....
o
::@
01)
'v
z
"d
v
.~
;.:3
~
8
~~
o.....:l
u2,
'8
......
v
~
v
u
is
Q
c;
'eg
]~
P::'.-'
~
8
v
~z
8u
Item # 14
P
P::
......
'-'
G
'-'
~
UQ
~8
S!.,::i
80
~
o
]
U
v
E-<
"8
ro
..c::
8
ro
v
00
~
~"
.!::
tij
;::l
"8
......
~ M
o g
~ 1: ."..c::
& .01) ~ ~
." a.9 ~
;;:::::Q)~~
-S?"dv
200,,=
..... ." ~ w
. ~ CJ rJJ.
CJ U ~
.~ .~ 8 ,g
~vu:>
o(/)<C~
1:f M
a g
o....c::
o ~
...... ro
v:>
~~
~~
~]
v 0
oo~
~~
gjl
.!::
.s
U
~
8
::s
1:
01)
;.:3
~
~
v
o
"d
v
.~
;.:3
~
.!::
......
00
;::l
"8d
...... '-'
~
8
v
~o
ou
u'-'
P
P::
......
'-'
~
o
]
U
v
E-<
"8
ro
..c::
8
ro
v
00
~
~"
.!::
tij
;::l
"8
......
If)
0\
P::
(/)
......
~
~
v"
~
C'j 1:f
:8 a
~~ g. v
v v ro
:: .gfs ~ ~
'"0 (/)
~t)~~~
8~,g~g
1: ;::l ~ v .'"
OI)roCllOO,.!:<
;J::S~~>
~
~
v
o
~
.!::
......
00
~9
...... '-'
g
(/)
o
'-'
;::l
o
'.0
ro
~
U
v
~
v
U
ro
0..
(/)
;::l
v
8'
P::
(/)
......
~
~
v ."
~ .q
~;;:::::
(/) U
..... ro 00
Ii) ~ 00
0.. ;::l 8
o.g ~
v ro
~ ~ ~
,6 ~ ro
~P::~
U ..... ~
.~ 0 u
:g;o~
p,,~o:l
v
U
ro
0..
(/)
;::l
v
0..
o
'i:;
o
'.0
ro~
~(/)
~~
P::,-,
o
~
.....
~
~"d
13 8
0..00
o v
v..c::
~ ~
"d v
;::lo:l
2 00
~ ~ 00
~ ~ g
z~o
;::l
o
'.0
ro
~
v
00
v~
.....p"
p",-,
~
p"
'-'
;::l
.9
~
~
v
00
~
p"
o
C"j
00
@
o
o:l
.8
......
U
v
:g
~~
~......
~" ~
~~~
~ .9 Q)
p" .~ o:l
.~ 813
::J~~
gf@8
...... 0 p"
~o:l~
~ ~.9
o 'a'~
If) 00 :>
('l08
......::r:P"
P::
(/)
......
o
......
~
~
~
......
'-'
~
o
.~
:t:::
'@
......
Attachment number 2
Page 4 of 5
~
......
'-'
~
p"
'-'
;::l
.9
~
~
v
00
~
p"
~
o
.~
:t:::
'@
......
o
0\
P::
(/)
......
~
~
<C
Z
00" rJJ
"," 13.q ~
'OS ~ ~
,go ::J 13 v
~ .~ ~" 0.. ~
:0 'C ..9 oS v
~;::l ro ~.~ ~
,6 ~" 00 ::s 00 .g ~ '!3
~ ~ ~ tJ .v ::J ~ e
U u.t= o.E ~.~ ~
:g ~ rJJ e:n CJ ~ ~
~o~~&8'8~
~
o
'.0
.~
'@Q
...... '-'
@
~
.9
~
~
o
0..
~2
~E-<
~
>:::
v
6
~
~
'8
.....
f2
v
~
~
Item # 14
~
......
~
~
00"
o
I
"'1'
('l
0\
t-
o
z
"E
o
"'1'
v v
il il
<..., ~
o 0
v "d
en V
;j en
~ "d 2
en 8 t'
[1 E P..
o u 0
bb; ~ a
.s ~ "5 ~
~..2 v .a
- u il .0
:B~ ~ ~
V.~ ..... 00
il.e., .~ lj
~ .......... '+:l
o bD'-"~ <...,
~ .s ~ E 0
~.s 5.~ ~
v.o 8 ~ ;j
..Q"'[ S 8 "d
~OJ~o.f ~
~-B5bB E
Ud_U sa
v.", 00 8 w
~ ~ g..... 8
!-. :::: ........ rn ~
~....... on !-. CJ
~"dSO .d
.en c;::1 .~ 00 ':;::l
8 2 .0 ~ il
~ "d ~ ~ ..~
~ ~ ~.~ 3 ~
00 >oil e;~E
1l "5 s :Jl v~ .~o
t;j 0... t-. .....
u:::gfo
..8 o...~ v" v U
"d bD~ gflS ~
8 .s ';j .... bD V
"d .S .D .8 c;j 8
ruO""'drflu!-.
.~ ~ 8 :Jl" ~ ~ .~
[l ~ 13 ;j .S .D ~ ]
"d c: ~ Jg .S ~ ~ ry
Si <.8 1] ;j .:2.,..p ~ .~
v v ;;cJ .~ "g .s v 00
~ ~ .~ ~ Jj t ~ .g"
~;;cJctJ6'S<"":>-o
8 00. 0 0 "
3~o.. ro>>bI)ru
......... ......... OJ a ~.t:: ca .~o ~
:::: rn~C'drnu::::rn
1jJ.s~"rn[)5~ ~
80..i:l~:::=:SbD.8v
~ :E .:e.~ ~ ::::......... S
> en v.~ .D 11 :8 ~ s
~ o~en:>-~oOOo..v
~ bD.9 a 8 g OJ ~ dj >
~ c;j ctJ <,::< 0.. en.!:::l 00 .... ~
? ucJrfl!-.!-.rn
~ 0 ...."8~<.8 "~:B~c;j
......-. ........:::: CO ~ OJ......... u
.D bD.~"d;j~o..~ 0
en .S V ~.D 8 c..;: v ~
[l ..S ~ 1;; :J< "d v !i'1 ~ d
U >0 o.p 8' ~ il ~ Ej .'"
o ......... """"7"'l U OJ U Cd ...s rn ::::
a iJ "g E il ~ tF: gf 00 .8 .0
OJ ~ rn :::: :::: OJ....... OJ ..... ~
J:!il;:.... o..::;lil"g.)::J 00 00
.u >0 v 0 1l"d ~ U [ v Jj
v .D ~ gf ~ 8 O.S ~ ;:l
~ 13 0 ~.D 13 +-I" rn .E .S
!-.If)........ CJrn::::""'drnrn
""'d OJ ,......,....... u u cd OJ E@ :::: ""'d
."8]]2 11~.DB~ 8~
c c ~ ..... 6'.s.~ € a3 U - ~
iJ .S 8 .~ 00 c;j"d [.)::J 5l] 1]
V;j>Ov<...,;j8:::v....env
>:S "C ~ ~ 0 .~".o 0.. ~ ~ OJ u
o~ .........>C'doournrn:::1
E 8; bD 1l ~ ~ 8 .S ~ "d ;j ~
~ o.~ :g.v ..p fr.s 8 ~ 8 c:
.8voOo..~oOeno-~ {!
t)~~:::v~v~v.sctJv
00 E-< '" o..~ ~~ oo~ en~ 0..
~~
v
~
E-<
;>.
P..
g-
v
il
o
.....
en
.~
P..
g-
-
c;j
~
[J
"d
@ .8"
~ ~
v v
~ xil
-€ ~~
<.8 '5 S
1l ~"8
en v S
~ S 00
.~ bD >.
"> ~ ~
::: 0....
0.. -0
rn" bD "
~ .5.s ~
~ v" . ~ P..
~ ~ ~E
rn" ca rfJ ~ "u=J
.~ .~.~ 0 a
~ -~?>
.u :g .~ ~ 8
<.S ~:::"8P..
en" il~5[J
~ t-. 4-.~,..D~
T; 0 ;: .u c;j ~
~ ilr v v 0..
~ rfJ ~ o.."G OJ
.g.s 0 ~.S il
~;g ~ .S S ~
:;.D ~ ~ 0 .8"
"d 0...... iJ..8~~ ~
8::: ~" .~ ;:s ;: S bD Jj
~ 0.. U ~ v v 8.S .....
00 bD.> ::: il ~ 0 ~ [1
]"~ ~ .8.8~~:8 8
"Uj ~o '"'~ rn t) .-- ~ ~ ]
~ ;jv~ vv
::::;.~ g ;E' iJ ~ il ~
~~,,"'5 .if ~ .~ .~ ~
P..5:>- 8.8"1l~~~
~ * 51 ~ ~ ~ ~ .s.s a
..... cd ".g ::::" ....... .;3 ~ >. ~ ~
.9 S 0.9 ~ ......... rn ""2 ~ ........
~ ]~" ~ "d ~ ~ ~ B .~ ;
rn ~ IjJ 8 ~ <JJ ~ IjJ 8. t5 .u=J
~1li:l ~ iiS[1ils.:::
S~ 0 ;jbD~c8~~~
~ a~ ..g a3~ >'V1 ro~~
8 g-c;j .g i:r~..8 8"3 [1 @ :-
:~ 8] :8 ~ 0 bD ::: ~ .~.8 *
tF: 0 8 ~ ~.S ~ 0 - 00
~ ..... 8' "9 ~ ~ .S ..::;l ~ ~ 11 8
~ ~ a ~V~ C.j +-J ~ ~ ~ ~ :9 ~
IjJ .'=' ~ 0: :::: ~ .;3 ro .",:::: ro ro :::: +-J
il 5l .8 ;E ..2 .s .~ >0 en "d ~ S '0
.s ~ ~ ~ a :::: ~ a ~ ~ IjJ 00
00 ~. t=1 0.. 00 .9 ~ !-. U ~,..q .~
~ t'd tn ~ o.~ ~ 0 "* ~ 5 ~ S
;j ~ s O<"".~;j ;>000..... 8'; U
c;j 0 ~ ~'G.Ef.rg 8 8 s ~ ~
.~]~ ~..::;l<.S 8 @]c;j ~~ e
8.D;;8 o..~~ Ot;:i~ o~'o
"'"' v ..... 0 ~.'" .~.D v en bD_
::: .D .r;: U ~ 8 ~ c;j il :Jl c;j ~ fl
~ ~ ::: .8 8 ~ ~.d' ~ ~ g iJ d
........... IjJ 0 ~.:::; >, ..... ..... .s ~ .~ .~
o 8 8;:D U ~ 8.@ :::.0.. bD ~ ~
.r;: [l P.. fl 00 8 ~ d 8; en .S ;>:. 8
~ "" <..., ..... .~ '" "" 0 ~ ~ L.,
.s ;g [J P 0 @ "d v ::: ~ .0 v "
aca ~ B ~ 0 ~ -5 ~ ~ ~ s
~.a8~p..,>~ ~~E-<~ a~
.8~~oj.Du"Ci~aoj.D
~
10:.,
.~
en
00
~
~
U
~
r-.i
,.,..;
"d
v
:g
v
~
U
en
.8
....
o
.~
0..
en
~
"d
o
M
8
il
en
en
~
.....
o
~
,-..
~
'5
~
v
:>-
o
bD
c;j
U
..8
bD
.S
~
.0
~
00
v
il
.8
Attachment number 2
Page 5 of 5
"d
8
~
.s
~
.s
......
~
~
00"
o
I
"'1'
('.l
0\
t-
o
z
"E
o
v
il
~
o
"d
v
en
00
.D
v
U
[1
....
~
[J
.s
~
..Q
.~
.....
v
.D
.8
en
00
o
en
,-..
~
'5
~
v
:>-
o
bD
.~
'V
~
gp
8
E
U
v
v
....
o
~
.8
~
.D
.>
c;j
U
..8
bD
~
:8
o
~
]"
~
~
v
.::;
en
o
]-
....
o
v
J:l
v
il
>0
.D
en
~
.8
ctJ
"d
~
~
o
U
~
"d
8
If)
en
'5
~
o
U
v
"d
.>
o
....
0..
.8
~
~
,-..
M
~
u
Item # 14
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 3
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Ordinance No.:
Agenda Item:
March 18, 2008
CP A2008-0 1 00 1
7924-08
H. 1.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Related to the Adoption of Alternative
Density and Intensity Standards for Overnight Accommodations, and the
addition of an Objective and Policies Pertaining to Tourism
INITIA TED BY:
City of Clearwater Planning Department
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting of October 24,2007, the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA) adopted Pinellas County
Ordinance No. 07-50. This ordinance amended the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the
Countywide Future Land Use Plan" (AKA Countywide Plan Rules), by establishing alternative density
and intensity standards for overnight accommodations within several Future Land Use categories.
The adoption of these alternative standards came about in the interest of supporting a viable tourist
industry and establishing economic parity for overnight accommodation uses. Further, the standards
themselves were formulated through an economic analysis on the relationship between land costs for
hotels and the land costs for condominiums, and the disparity between the two.
The amendment requires the adoption of these alternative density and intensity standards by local
government, and that they would be subject to the establishment of additional applicable requirements,
including design guidelines, a coordinated approach to transportation concurrency management, and
additional use restrictions.
Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and the continued support, maintenance and
enhancement of this important economic sector should be of primary concern to the City. While
overnight accommodations within the City are primarily situated on Clearwater Beach, the tourism
industry is found throughout the City. These proposed amendments would affect those properties not
located on Clearwater Beach that are governed by the provisions of Beach by Design.
ANAL YSIS:
Goal 2 of the Future Land Use Element states, in part, that the City shall utilize innovative and flexible
planning practices in order to redevelop blighted areas and encourage infill development. This
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan establishes Objective 2.6, which identifies tourism as a substantial
element of the City's economic base and states the need to support, maintain and enhance this economic
sector. The supporting Policies 2.6.1, 2.6.2, and 2.6.3 encourage the development and redevelopment of
overnight accommodation uses as well as the adoption of higher densities and intensities that would
support their development. Through this objective and policies the City will be better positioned to
further this goal of the Comprehensive Plan.
This amendment also proposes the adoption of the alternative density and intensity standards for
overnight accommodations that have been established by the CPA through amendment to the Countywide
Community Development Board - March 18, 2008
CP A2008-0 100 1 - Page 1
Item # 14
Attachment number 3
Page 2 of 3
Plan Rules. These alternatives affect the Resort Facilities High (RFH), Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R),
Commercial Limited (CL), Commercial General (CG) and Industrial Limited (IL) Future Land Use
categories, and would affect approximately 1,900 acres citywide. The alternatives in the RFH category
are the most intense, allowing between 75 and 125 units per acre and a floor area ratio between 2.0 and
4.0 depending upon property size. The other category alternatives allow a maximum density of 45,60 or
75 units per acre and a floor area ratio of 1.0, 1.2 or 1.5. Through the adoption of these alternatives the
City will be in compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.6.2.
The amendment also incorporates a few other relatively minor changes, including the deletion of the
Resort Facilities Overlay (RFO) Future Land Use Map classification, which was incorporated into the
Comprehensive Plan in 2005. The RFO classification has never been implemented and would no longer
be required within the Comprehensive Plan. The other minor changes incorporated into this amendment
include the addition of the overnight accommodations use a primary use within the IL Future Land Use
category; and correction of a few grammatical and punctuation errors.
STANDARDS FOR REVIEW:
Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603.F., no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:
1. The amendment will further implementation of the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals,
policies and objectives contained in the Plan.
The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with existing goals in that the
amendments will further those flexible planning practices in redeveloping blighted areas and
encouraging infill development.
2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed amendment will add a new objective and three supporting policies to the Future Land
Use Element that promotes the continued support of the tourism industry in the City. The amendment
also adopts alternative density and intensity standards consistent with the "Rules Concerning the
Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan," which are supported by the
aforementioned objective and policies being added. As such, the amendment would not be
inconsistent with other provisions of the Plan.
3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in
question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area.
The proposed amendments will affect properties citywide; however the amendments will not alter the
uses to which those properties may be put. Therefore, the uses available to the properties are
compatible with existing and planned uses in the area.
4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property.
The proposed amendments will affect properties citywide; therefore the adequacy of available public
facilities will need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis as development proposals seek to make use
of those alternative density and intensity standards. It is noted that adequate public facilities exist to
serve development at the existing density and intensity standards, and it is anticipated that adequate
public facilities will exist to accommodate development at the alternative density and intensity
standards. It is further noted that no capacity issues are anticipated with either wastewater or potable
water service. The City has a wastewater capacity of approximately 28.5 MGD (million gallons per
Community Development Board - March 18, 2008
CP A2008-0 100 1 - Page 2
Item # 14
Attachment number 3
Page 3 of 3
day) compared to a recent peak historic flow (past five years) of 20.04 MGD. The City's average
consumption of potable water is 13 MGD, and the City has facilities that can produce 4 MGD. The
balance of the potable water service comes from Tampa Bay Water via interconnects with Pine lIas
County, and there is no cap on the agreement for purchased water.
5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment.
Any redevelopment that should occur as a result of the proposed amendments must still comply with
impervious surface ratio standards, as well as drainage and water quality standards. Further, the
proposed amendments do not permit increases in the permanent population in any coastal high hazard
area. Therefore, the proposed amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment.
6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area.
The proposed amendments will affect properties citywide; however, as noted previously, the
amendments will not alter the uses to which those properties may be put. Therefore, the amendment
will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate areas of those properties that may
choose to utilize the provisions of the proposed amendments.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDA nON:
The proposed amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan identifies tourism as a substantial
element of the City's economic base and states the need to support, maintain and enhance this economic
sector through the addition of a new objective and supporting policies within the Future Land Use
Element. The amendment also adopts alternative density and intensity standards for overnight
accommodations consistent with the Countywide Plan Land Rules. The proposed amendment will further
the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, is consistent with other
provisions of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, will not result in inappropriate or incompatible uses,
will not adversely affect the natural environment or impact the use of property in the immediate area, and
sufficient public facilities exist to implement the proposed amendment. Based upon the above, the
Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 7924-08 that amends the Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
ATTACHMENT:
o Ordinance No. 7924-08
o Pinellas County Ordinance No. 07-50
o PPC StatfReport ofJanuary 17, 2007
o Map of Affected Land Use Categories
o Potable Water and Wastewater Utility Capacity Analysis
S:\Planning DepartmentlCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN\2008 Comprehensive PlanICPA2008-0IOOI - OV AC Unit ReservelCDB StajjReport 2008
03-I8.doc
Community Development Board - March 18, 2008
CP A2008-0 100 1 - Page 3
Item # 14
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Petition for Future Land Use Plan Amendment from County Residential Urban (RU) to City Residential/Office General
(R/OG) and Zoning Atlas Amendment from the County R-3, Single-Family Residential District, to the City Office (0) District for 2723
S.R. 580 (Lot 5 Block 1 Acker's Subdivision in Section 28, Township 28 South, Range 16 East); By Ordinance 7941-08, Resind
Ordinances 7405-05 and 7406-05 and Pass Ordinances 7922-08 and 7923-08 on first reading. (LUZ2004-11007)
SUMMARY:
The subject property is located at 2723 S.R. 580, on the south side of S.R. 580 approximately 1,300 feet west of McMullen Booth
Road. On May 5, 2005 the City Council approved on second reading the annexation (ANX2004-110l9) of this property, as well as a
land use plan amendment from the Residential Urban category to the Residential/Office General category and rezoning from the
property's County designation to the City's Office District (LUZ2004-11007). The applicant has since constructed a two-story office
building, 2,428 square feet in area.
Due to a staff change, the Planning Department audited some files in 2007 and discovered that this case had not been forwarded to the
Department of Community Affairs (DCA). This case was processed as an adopted small-scale amendment and forwarded to DCA
consistent with past practices. Upon review, DCA indicated that the land use plan amendment should have been a large-scale
amendment because the Residential/Office General land use category allows residential density exceeding 10 units per acre. Clearwater,
as well as all Pinellas County communities, has historically processed land use plan amendments involving a mixed-use land use
classification as small-scale because the categories are not exclusively residential classifications. The DCA has indicated that any land
use category allowing residential density exceeding 10 units per acre is considered a large-scale amendment and must be processed
accordingly. City legal staff has advised the Planning Department that the ordinances concerning the future land use and rezoning must
be rescinded and replaced by new ordinances. For this reason this case is being returned to the City Council for consideration. The
annexation ordinance will remain as adopted.
The Planning Department has determined that the proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning applications are consistent with the
following standards specified in the Community Development Code:
. The proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning application are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area.
. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property.
. The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment.
Please refer to the land use plan and rezoning (LUZ2004-11007) report for the complete staff analysis.
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 15
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 6
o
~
$EDSTATE:DCIR,,~N i
.::: ..Q I-.!ll Cb ~-I'I
o ~ ~ 0
Eagle Estates Cir S (1"\
A
~
o
PROJECT
SITE
Location Map
Owner Mr. Richard T. Heiden Case: LUZ2004-11007
Site: 2723 S.R. 580 Property 0.164
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 28-28-16-00036-001-0050
From RU (County) R-3 (County)
To: R/OG (City) o (City) Atlas Page: 212A
Item # 15
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 6
Aerial Photograph
Owner Mr. Richard T. Heiden Case: LUZ2004-11007
Site: 2723 S.R. 580 Property 0.164
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 28-28-16-00036-001-0050
From: RU (County) R-3 (County)
To: R/OG (City) o (City) Atlas Page: 212A
Item # 15
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 6
I 1
L__J
flU
L'-_31 1
1__1
~3'L,
rl ''If
l____1
I I
I '
,J U1
129.B9._J
r--1
I I
L__}
I--k~
I I 1
9' I __J
~ 1__1
'--I i--L_
-, I "I
8 1 1 9~.!
---~ 1__,
_!l---
a
'"
i'l
I
I 1_,
L_ I
26i'5-9... "
1--1
I I
-113 I
-I 1
~666
1-32-1
) ~I
L J
1 2679 1
L1 33i
L__r
1 2673l_
~--, 34 I
I r"
I I
2667
:-. -~-L-l J--- -lJ------l
I " I
L'L___rJ1,__ _-,-1~,-__-,J
I---al---~I_.lr-"\.I
I ~ I
L...,_~r~L_.r-.:-L_,__-J
,"-'_ _r-~, __-~,
I ~ IJ LI I
I <0 I
1_'-_;JL...,_.....-IL~_rJ
^
/ ,
/ ,
/ ,
,
v'
~,
'./
-II
,JI
-"
'"
~ O'l --I a
I-J-ijl R I L__I~
l_1ll 1 L_1[" Ii 12 1
L_...J -----
I I
1 r
~J ~
, <0'
I "-I
~J ~
[__J
R,.r-,-~Lr----~l
I 1
r---llt~__~J~__J
~, L,I L- _ ---1
r ,
I I
~I ~"
I""' ~'-I
I I
r----
, I
I 1
, I
I '
L I
S c-;
I' ,
I I
I "I
IL ~-1"
.....' ('\J...,
I '
2660
1--'
L..__J
1--
,
I
L
:'
,
I
L
!..-
1....l-~J--~ll..J-~:-'L1
I I
I 2fj14 I
l___fi-_.rJ L....._--'"-L_....._I
1--:....;....-""'--......-.-
Proposed Future Land Use Map
Owner
Mr. Richard T. Heiden
Case:
LUZ2004-11007
Site:
2723 S.R. 580
Property
Size (Acres):
0.164
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 28-28-16-00036-001-0050
From
RU (County)
R-3 (County)
To:
R/OG (City)
o (City)
Atlas Page:
212A
Item # 15
I 1
L__J
'"
I'-. r-~
~~ I
I I
L"_31 1
1__1
~3'L,
,I ''If
l____1
I I
I '
IJ U1
129.89._J
I 1--;k-~1
~ : __J ~
~ 1__1 O'l
1--1 ~-L_
,-I 1'1'
I I I ,
I 8 I I 9~~
----~ 1__1
_9---
r--w_
I I_
I I
I ~ I
L_J';f-J --~-,
~ \ 11
~ ,
, J
'.g.lliW'--
L-L_
1---1
-II 26 ""
rJ1 ~
_J -l1
1--' 1--1.
27 Lf.'2 I 28 ~
~ I _--I;")
-L!' I_J
~686
1-32-1
) -I
L J
1 2679 1
L1 33i
L__r
1 2673l_
L, 34 I
I ,J
I I
2667
0f-~
~
-,_J
'"
,-_ ~ r~ r--I a
I III -- '1 I L___~
1-- I I I I'"
l_w 1 ,_J.f" II 12 1
L_...J -----
1--1
I I
-113 I
_I 1
Owner
Mr. Richard T. Heiden
Site:
2723 S.R. 580
Land Use
From
RU (County)
To:
R/OG (City)
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 6
r--1
I I
L__}
a
'"
1'l
I---a-l---~Irr--""I
I ~ I
L...,_;J~L_.r-':-L-,___J
:-. -~-L-L J--- -lJ------l
I " I
L.L___rJI____~.J>--~rJ MHD R
1 ,
~J ~
, <n\
I "-I
~J ~
[__J
,0-__ _r-'_ __-__
I ~ IJ LI I
I <n I
1_,-_;JL...,_-,-IL~_rJ
^
/ '-
/ ,
/ '-
,
V'
~,
'./
r----
, I
I 1
, I
I 1
, I
S c-;
II 1
I I
I "I
IL ~-I
.....1 C\JL,
I 1
2660
1--'
L__J
1--
,
,
,
:'
,
\
L
!..-
l....l-~J--~Il...l-~:-'LI
I I
I 20:74 I
l___fi-_.rJ L....._J-L_~_I
1.r--r-'-lJ-----~l
I I
I
r---llt~__~J~_rJ
~, '11 L- _ -----1
r ,
I I
LI ~"
I""' ~I
I I
1--.......:....-........,....._.-
Zoning Map
Case:
LUZ2004-11007
Property
Size (Acres):
0.164
Zoning
PIN: 28-28-16-00036-001-0050
R-3 (County)
o (City)
Atlas Page:
212A
Item # 15
Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 6
I 1
L__J
'"
I'-. r-~
~~ I
I I
L"_31 1
1__1
~3'L,
,I ''If
l____1
I I
I '
IJ U1
I29B!LJ
r--1
I I
L__}
I 1--;k-~1
~ : __J ~
~ 1__1 O'l
School
1--1 ~-L_
,-I 1'1'
I I I ,
I 8 I I 9~~
----~ 1__1
L-L_
<:II
-
"_ 10 eJ)
I --_=
/ 115
I ~ I
L_J';f-J --~-,
~ \ 11
~ ,
, J
'.g.lliW'--
_9---
a
'"
1'l
3106
1---1
-II 26 ""
rJ1 ~
_J -l1
1--' 1--1.
27 Lf.'2 I 28 ~
~ I _--I;")
-L!' I_J
0f-~
~
-,_J
I
~686
1-32-1
"' -I
L J
1 2679 1
L1 33i
L__r
1 2673l_
L, 34 I
I ,J
I I
2667
:-. -~-L-L J--- -lJ------l
I " I
L'L___rJ1,__ _-,-1~,-___rJ
I---a-l---~Irr--....I
I ~ I
L...,_;J~L_.r-.:-L_,__-J
,0-__ _r-'_ __-__
I ~ IJ LI I
I <0 I
1_,-_;JL...,_-,-IL~_rJ
^
/ ,
/ ,
/ ,
,
v'
~,
'J
I I
1 ,
~J ~
, <0'
I "-I
~J ~
[__J
MiiIfi.l.J------,
I I
I
r---l rtamnY'~__J
~, '11 ~sklentiRI
r ,
I I
LI ~"
I""' ~I
I I
r----
, I
I 1
, I
I 1
, I
S c-;
II ,
I I
I "I
IL ~-I
.....1 C\JL,
I '
2660
1--'
L__J
1--
,
,
,
:'
,
\
L
L_
1--1
I I
-113 I
-I 1
l....l-~J--~Il...l-~:-'LI
I I
I 20:74 I
l___fi-_.rJ L....._J-L_~_I
1--.......:....-........,....._.-
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner
Mr. Richard T. Heiden
Case:
LUZ2004-11007
Site:
2723 S.R. 580
Property
Size (Acres):
0.164
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 28-28-16-00036-001-0050
From
RU (County)
R-3 (County)
To:
R/OG (City)
o (City)
Atlas Page:
212A
Item # 15
View looking southeast from S.R. 580
View looking southwest from S.R. 580
View looking at property adjacent to the west
View looking south from S.R. 580
View looking at property adjacent to the east
View looking east from neighborhood to the south of the site
L UZ2004-11 007
2723 S.R. 580
Item #'
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 7
CDB Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
March 15,2005
LUZ2004-11007
D-2
Updated for City Council Meeting on March 20,2008.
Update. Both the annexation and land use/rezoning cases ANX2004-11019 and LUZ2004-11007
were passed on second reading by City Council on May 5, 2005. While auditing files within the
Planning Department in 2007, Planning staff determined that a change in department personnel
had resulted in a delay of submission of this case to the State of Florida Department of
Community Affairs (DCA). The land use case was then submitted as an adopted small-scale
development amendment to DCA. The City was subsequently informed by DCA that the
submittal did not qualify as a small-scale amendment due to a change in the procedures used by
DCA in processing land use amendments, and that the case must be resubmitted as a large scale
amendment under the new policy. City legal staff has advised the Planning Department that the
ordinances concerning the future land use and rezoning must be rescinded and replaced by new
ordinances. For this reason this case is being returned to the City Council for consideration. The
annexation ordinance will remain as adopted.
The subject property is located at 2723 S.R. 580, on the south side of S.R. 580 approximately
1,300 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. The future land use plan amendment and rezoning are
requested by the applicant who, upon approval of the annexation and land use cases, constructed
a two-story office building 2,428 square feet in area on this 0.16 acre vacant lot.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
OWNER! APPLICANT:
Richard T. Heiden
LOCATION:
2723 S.R. 580
REQUEST:
(a) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Urban
(RU) Classification (County) to Residential/Office
General (R/OG) Classification (City) (pending
ANX2004-11019); and
(b) Rezoning from the R-3, Single Family Residential
District (County) to the Office (0) District (City of
Clearwater) (pending ANX2004-11019).
SITE INFORMATION
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 15, 2005 - Case LUZ2004-11007
~ml# 15
Attachment number 2
Page 2 of 7
PROPERTY SIZE:
7, 152 square feet or 0.164 acres
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
60 feet wide by 119 feet deep
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Offi ce
Offi ce
PLAN CATEGORY:
Current Category:
Proposed Category:
Residential Urban (RU) (County)
Residential/Office General (R/OG) (City)
ZONING DISTRICT:
Current District:
Proposed District:
R-3, Single-Family Residential (County)
Office (0) (City)
EXISTING
SURROUNDING USES:
North: School
South: Single-family residential
East: Offi ce
West: Office
ANALYSIS:
This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves one parcel of
land, approximately 0.164-acre property located on the south side of S.R. 580 approximately
1,300 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. This property was also the subject of a companion
application to annex the property into the City of Clearwater (Case# ANX2004-11019). The site
is currently vacant and has a FLUP designation of Residential Urban (RU) and a zoning
classification of R-3, Single Family Residential (County). In 2004, the applicant requested to
amend the FLUP designation of the site to the Residential/Office General (R/OG) classification
and to rezone it to the Office (0) District (City). The annexation and land use cases were
approved and the site was permitted for the construction of the office building.
The analysis for the land use case is restated here.
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subj ect to
approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the
Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the size of the property and the proposed FLUP map
category, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is required.
I. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN [Section 4-603.F.l]
Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan in support
of the proposed land use plan amendment are as indicated below:
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 15, 2005 - Case LUZ2004-l1007
Itemg#215
Attachment number 2
Page 3 of 7
2.1 Objective -The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned
development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill
development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment.
2.2.1 Policy - On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan
approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned
developments that are compatible.
3.0 Goal - A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to
accommodate public demand and promote infill development.
5.1.1 Policy - No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level
of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment,
garbage collection, and drainage) to fall below minimum acceptable levels. However,
development orders may be phased or otherwise modified consistent with provisions of
the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with
the impacts of development.
The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals,
Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN
The purpose of the proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) category, as specified in Section
2.3.3.4.2 of the Countywide Rules, is to designate areas in the County that are now used, or
appropriate to be used for office and/or medium density residential uses and to recognize such
areas as primarily well-suited for mixed use of an office/residential character consistent with the
surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The
Residential/Office General (R/OG) category is generally appropriate to locations where it would
serve as a transition from an urban activity center or more intensive non-residential use to low
density residential or public/semi-public use; and in areas where the size and scale of office and
residential use is appropriate to free standing office, medium density residential or a combination
thereof. These areas are typically in close proximity to and served by the arterial and major
thoroughfare highway network, as well as by mass transit.
The proposed use of the property for an office development is consistent with the purposes of the
Residential/Office General (R/OG) category. The site is located along a major arterial, S.R. 580
and is in close proximity to McMullen Booth Road, another major arterial. The property is
adjacent to other office uses and is immediately north of residential property. The proposed
designation will provide an appropriate transition between this arterial and the abutting
residential area to the south and east.
The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the purpose and locational characteristics of the
Countywide Plan.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 15, 2005 - Case LUZ2004-l1007
Itemg#315
Attachment number 2
Page 4 of 7
III. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY/CHARACTER OF THE
CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD [Section 4-602.F.2 & 4-603.F.3]
Primarily commercial and office uses characterize S.R. 580 between McMullen Booth Road and
Allen Avenue. Residential uses exist further to the west along S.R. 580. The Countryside High
School is located on the north side of S.R. 580 across from the subject site. Residential/Office
General (R/OG) future land use is located to the east and west of the site, while Residential
Urban (RU) future land use is located to the south of the site. Residential/Office General (R/OG)
dominates the land use to the east of the property along McMullen Booth Road while Residential
Urban (RU) land use is located farther to the west and south.
The existing surrounding uses include single-family dwellings to the south and offices to the east
and west. Office buildings are located farther to the south and east of the site. The proposed
FLUP designation and rezoning is in character with the overall FLUP designation along this
block and is compatible with surrounding uses.
IV. SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
As stated earlier, the subject site is approximately 0.164 acres in area and is presently vacant.
Based on a maximum permitted density of 7.5 units per acre in the Residential Urban (RU)
category, one dwelling unit could be constructed on this site. The allowable development
potential in the Residential/Office General (R/OG) category is 15 units per acre, which would
allow two dwelling units to be constructed on this site although the Office (0) zoning district
does not allow for the construction of residential uses.
Roadways
The accepted methodology for reviewing the transportation impacts of proposed plan
amendments is based on the Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation guidelines.
The PPC's traffic generation rates have been calculated for the subject site based on the existing
and proposed FLUP categories and are included in the next table.
Maximum Dail Added Potential Tri s
Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Trips3
Volume of S.R. 580 from McMullen Booth Road to
Landmark Drive
LOS of S.R. 580 from McMullen Booth Road to Landmark
Drive
N/ A ~ Not Applicable LOS ~ Level-of-Service
1 = Based on PPC calculations of 70 trips per acre per day for the
Residential Urban Future Land Use Category.
2 = Based on PPC calculations of 170 trips per acre per day for the
Residential/Office General Future Land Use Category.
3 = Based on MPO K-factor of 0.095
Source: "The Rules" of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan
33,721
33,732
33,748
16
C
C
C
C
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 15, 2005 - Case LUZ2004-11007
Itemg#415
Attachment number 2
Page 5 of 7
Based on the 2003 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service
Report, the segment of S.R. 580 from McMullen Booth Road and Landmark Drive has a LOS of
C. The proposed Future Land Use Plan category could generate an increase in PM Peak Hour
traffic on this segment of S.R. 580 by two trips. This increase is de minimus and the LOS of the
surrounding road network will not be negatively impacted.
Specific uses in the current and proposed zoning districts have also been analyzed for the level of
vehicle trips that could be generated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Manual.
Existing Zoning/Future Land Use Plan
Single-family residential
(9.57 trips/dwelling unit)
1
10
N/A
1
N/A
dwelling unit
Proposed Zoning/Future Land Use Plan
Medical Office Building
(36.13 trips/1,000 square teet)
3,484
126
116
5
4
square feet
General Office Building
(11.01 trips/1,000 square feet)
3,484
38
29
15
14
square feet
The transportation impacts associated with this land use plan amendment are minimal and will
not degrade the LOS of S.R. 580. It is anticipated that the small number of increased trips will
have no impact on the operational efficiency of the signalized intersections within this segment
of S.R. 580.
Mass Transit
The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The
total miles of fixed route service will not change; the subject site is located along an existing
transit route and headways are less than or equal to one hour. Pinellas Suncoast Transit
Authority (PSTA) bus service is available along S.R. 580.
Water
The current FLUP category could use up to 250 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP
category, water demand could approach approximately 348 gallons per day. The proposed land
use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for water.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 15, 2005 - Case LUZ2004-l1007
Itemg#515
Attachment number 2
Page 6 of 7
Wastewater
The current FLUP category could produce up to 200 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP
category, sewer demand could approach approximately 279 gallons per day. The proposed land
use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for wastewater.
Solid Waste
The current Residential Low FLUP category would result in the production of 2.53 tons of solid
waste per year. Under the proposed FLUP category an office could generate 9.4 tons of solid
waste per year. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for solid
waste disposal.
Recreation and Open Space
The proposed FLUP amendment and rezoning will not impact the LOS of recreational acreage or
facilities due to the non-residential land use classification.
V. IMPACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT [Section 4-603.F.5.]
Prior to development of the subject property, site plan approval will be required. At that time, the
stormwater management system will be required to meet all City and Southwest Florida Water
Management District (SWFWMD) stormwater management criteria. Water quantity and quality
will be controlled in compliance with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. As there are no
wetlands on the subject site that could be impacted by future development, the natural
environment will not be affected.
VI. LOCATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES [Section 4-602 .F.6.]
The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of streets
and ownership lines. The location of the proposed Office (0) District boundaries are logical and
consolidates this site into the appropriate zoning district. It will blend into the existing Office
(0) District to the east and west.
VII. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-602.F.1. and .2.]
The existing land use plan category and zoning district permits a density of7.5 dwelling units per
acre and an impervious surface ratio (ISR) of 0.40. The proposed Residential/Office General
(R/OG) land use category and Office (0) District is more intensive and permits a density of 15
dwelling units per acre, Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.50 and an ISR of 0.75. The size of the
subject site is 7,152 square feet in area. It does not meet the minimum lot area requirement of
10,000 square feet and minimum lot width requirement of 100 feet for an office in the Office (0)
District. A companion Level Two Flexible Development application (case FLD2004-11 082 and
agenda item D-l) fully addresses these issues.
The proposed use of this property is consistent with the uses allowed in the Office (0) zoning
district.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 15, 2005 - Case LUZ2004-l1007
Itemg#615
Attachment number 2
Page 7 of 7
Approval of this land use plan amendment and zoning district designation does not
guarantee the right to develop on the subject property. Transportation concurrency must be
met, and the property owner will have to comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the
time development permits are requested.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An amendment of the FLUP from the Residential Urban (RU) category to the Residential/Office
General (R/OG) category and a rezoning from the R-3, Single Family Residential District to the
Office (0) District for the subject site is requested. This 0.164-acre site does not exceed the
minimum lot area and lot width requirements for the proposed use of the property as an office
however, a companion Level Two Flexible Development application (see case FLD2004-11082
and agenda item D-l) fully addresses these issues. The neighborhood is surrounded by offices to
the east and west and farther to the east and south, a school to the north and single-family
residential dwellings to the south. The proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning is
compatible with the existing neighborhood.
The proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) Future Land Use classification and Office (0)
zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is
compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services,
is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of
the City.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the
request:
ACTIONS:
1. Recommend APPROVAL of the Land Use Plan amendment to the Residential/Office
General (R/OG) Classification (City); and
2. Recommend APPROVAL of the Rezoning to the Office (0) District (City).
Prepared by Planning Department staff:
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
Attachments:
Application
Location Map
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Land Use Plan Map
Zoning Map
Existing Surrounding Uses
Site Photographs
S: \Planning DepartmentlC D EILand Use AmendmentslLUZ 2004ILUZ2004-11 0072723 SR. 580 Heiden OjficeILUZ2004-11 007 Stajf
Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 15, 2005 - Case LUZ2004-11007
Itemg#715
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7941-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
RESCINDING ORDINANCES NOS. 7405-05 AND 7406-05;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater previously adopted Ordinance Nos. 7405-05 and
7406-05, effective May 5, 2005, which designated a Comprehensive Plan land use
category of Residential/Office General and a Zoning District of Office upon annexation of
certain property located at 2723 State Road 580; and
WHEREAS, the City received correspondence dated May 9, 2007 from the Florida
Department of Community Affairs indicating that the comprehensive plan amendment
package failed to qualify as a small-scale amendment and that the amendment was
ineffective, and requiring that the amendment be rescinded, readopted and resubmitted
with the next proposed large-scale amendment cycle, the next feasible such cycle being in
March 2008; and
WHEREAS, it is thus necessary to rescind the comprehensive plan
amendment/designation and its accompanying zoning designation in order that they be
readopted by means of the proposed Ordinances Nos. 7922-08 and 7923-08; now
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance Nos. 7405-05 and 7406-05 are hereby rescinded, and
shall be of no further force and effect.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. I~ #1815
Attachment number 3
Page 2 of 2
2
Ordinance No. ~-#815
Attachment number 4
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 7922-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE
LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF S.R. 580 APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET WEST OF
MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, CONSISTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1,
ACKER'S SUBDIVISION, LESS THAT PORTION TAKEN FOR
ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 2723 S.R. 580, AS RESIDENTIAUOFFICE
GENERAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive
plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate,
and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of
Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described
property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
Lot 5, Block 1, Acker's Subdivision, (less that portion
taken for additional right-of-way, recorded in O.R. 7967,
Page 165) as recorded in Plat Book 30, Page 91, Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida. (LUZ2004-11007)
Land Use CateQorv
Residential/Office General
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with
the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 15
Ordinance No. 7922-08
Attachment number 5
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 7923-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF S.R. 580 APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET WEST OF
MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, CONSISTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1,
ACKER'S SUBDIVISION, LESS THAT PORTION TAKEN FOR
ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 2723 S.R. 580, AS OFFICE (0); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance
is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive
plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby
zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is
amended, as follows:
Property
Lot 5, Block 1, Acker's Subdivision, (less that portion
taken for additional right-of-way, recorded in O.R. 7967,
Page 165) as recorded in Plat Book 30, Page 91, Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida. (LUZ2004-11007)
ZoninQ District
Office (0)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 15
Ordinance No. 7923-08
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the Residential Urban (RU) and Institutional (I) Classifications to the Residential
Medium (RM) Classification and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from the Institutional (I) District to the Medium Density Residential
(MDR) District for property located at 802, 826, and 830 Woodlawn Street and an unaddressed parcel designated as
22/29/15/00000/320/0200 (consisting of a portion of property located in metes and bounds 32/02, 32/03 and 32/07, in Section 22,
Township 29 South, Range 15 East); and Pass Ordinances 7945-08 and 7946-08 on first reading. (LUZ2006-08006)
SUMMARY:
This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involve property comprising approximately 8.10 acres in area
located northeast of the CSX Railroad Right -of-Way and Woodlawn Street. This property has FL UP classifications of Residential
Urban (RU) and Institutional (I) and zoning designations of Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Institutional (I). The applicant is
requesting to amend the FLUP designations of the site to the Residential Medium (RM) classification and to rezone the property to the
Medium Density Residential (MDR) District in order to re-establish the use of the property for multi-family residential purposes. There
is an existing single family dwelling and eight attached residential dwelling units on the site.
In 2001, the applicant was seeking to redevelop the site for institutional use. To accommodate that use, this property went through a
land use plan amendment from the Residential Medium FLUP classification to the Institutional FLUP classification and a rezoning from
the Medium Density Residential to the Institutional Zoning District (Case LUZ 01-08-06). Today, for the property as described above,
the applicant is proposing workforce housing, with 112 attached residential units. To accommodate the residential use, a portion of the
prior site is now proposed to be Residential Medium FLUP classification and Medium Density Residential Zoning District.
The Planning Department determined that the proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning amendment, as recommended, are
consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code:
The proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning application are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area.
Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property.
The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment.
Please refer to the land use plan amendment and rezoning (LUZ2006-08006) staff report for the complete analysis.
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to the approval of the Pinellas Planning Council
and the Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. The application is a large-scale amendment and
review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is required.
The Community Development Board reviewed these applications at its public hearing on September 18,2007 and unanimously
recommended approval of the Future Land Use Plan amendment.
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 16
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Owner/ Appli cant:
Address:
Agenda Item:
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 8
September 18, 2007
LUZ2006-08006
Woodlawn Church of God Board of Trustees
802, 826, 830 Woodlawn Street
& unaddressed parcel designated as
22/29/15/00000/320/0200
Fl
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
REQUEST:
SITE INFORMATION
PROPERTY SIZE:
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
(a) Future Land Use Plan amendment from the
Residential Urban (RU) Classification to the
Residential Medium (RM) Classification (802
Woodlawn Street), and from the Institutional (I)
Classification to the Residential Medium (RM)
Classification (826 and 830 Woodlawn Street
and an unaddressed parcel designated as
22/29/15/00000/320/0200); and
(b) Rezoning from the Institutional (I) District to
the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
(826 and 830 Woodlawn Street and an
unaddressed parcel designated as
22/29/15/00000/320/0200).
353,037 square feet or 8.10 acres
Single-family residential and attached dwellings
112 attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
Current Category:
Proposed Category:
Residential Urban (RU) and Institutional (I)
Residential Medium (RM)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September l8, 2007 - Case LUZ2006-08006
Page 1
Item # 16
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 8
ZONING DISTRICT:
Current District:
Proposed District:
Medium Density Residential (MDR) and
Institutional (I)
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
EXISTING
SURROUNDING USES:
North: Recreational park
South: Single family residential
East: Single family residential and multi-family
residential
West: Single family residential
ANALYSIS:
This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves
property comprising approximately 8.10 acres in area located northeast of the CSX
Railroad Right-of-Way and Woodlawn Street. This property has a FLUP classifications
of Residential Urban (RU) and Institutional (I) and zoning designations of Medium
Density Residential (MDR) and Institutional (I). The applicant is requesting to amend
the FLUP designations of the site to the Residential Medium (RM) classification and to
rezone the property to the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District in order to
develop 112 new attached residential units. An existing single family residential
structure and an eight attached residential units are proposed to be demolished in order
for the new units to be constructed. Two ponds are located at the approximate center of
the site.
In 2001, the applicant was seeking to redevelop the site for institutional use. To
accommodate that use, this property went through a land use plan amendment from the
Residential Medium FLUP classification to the Institutional FLUP classification and a
rezoning from the Medium Density Residential to the Institutional Zoning District (Case
# LUZ 01-08-06). Today, for the property as described above, the applicant is proposing
workforce housing, with 112 attached residential units. To accommodate the residential
use, a portion of the prior site is now proposed to be Residential Medium FLUP
classification and Medium Density Residential Zoning District.
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the FLUP amendment is subject to
approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as
the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the size of the parcel, review and approval
by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is not required.
I. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN [Section 4-
603.F.l]
Recommended Findings of Fact
Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan in
support of the proposed land use plan amendment are as indicated below:
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September l8, 2007 - Case LUZ2006-08006
Page 2
Item # 16
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 8
3.0 Goal - A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be
provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development.
3.2.2 Policy - Residential land uses shall be appropriately located on local and minor
collector streets; if appropriately buffered; they may be located on major collector
and arterial streets. Residential land uses shall be sited on well-drained soils, in
proximity to parks, schools, mass transit and other neighborhood-serving land
uses.
16.1.1 Policy - Maintain sufficient residentially zoned acreage, of varying densities and
locations, to accommodate the existing and future housing needs of the City of
Clearwater.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The re-establishment of a Residential Medium Future Land Use Classification at this
location will be compatible with the surrounding environment and will not negatively
impact levels of City services. The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN
Recommended Findings of Fact
The purpose of the proposed Residential Medium (RM) category, as specified in Section
2.3.3.2.2 of the Countywide Rules, is to depict those areas of the County that are now
developed, or appropriate to be developed, in moderately intensive residential manner;
and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are
consistent with the urban qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource
characteristics of such areas.
The site is located on Woodlawn Street, in close proximity to the intersections of S.
Myrtle Avenue, Scranton Avenue, and Tyler Avenue. Significant vegetation frames these
streets. Although the predominant surrounding land use is single family residential, both
detached and attached residential dwellings occupy the north side of Woodlawn Street.
The proposed use of the property, attached dwellings, is consistent with the purposes of
the Residential Medium (RM) category.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the purpose and locational
characteristics of the Countywide Plan; therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent
with the Countywide Plan.
III. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY/CHARACTER
OF THE CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD [Section 4-602.F.2 & 4-603.F.3]
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September l8, 2007 - Case LUZ2006-08006
Page 3
Item # 16
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 8
Recommended Findings of Fact
This area of Clearwater, South Prospect Avenue, between Woodlawn Street and Howard
Street, is developed with residential land use, a small church office, and a church. To the
north south, east, and west are single-family detached dwellings. Multi-family residential
development is located along part of Woodlawn Street, to the east.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The proposed FLUP designation and rezoning are in character with the overall FLUP and
zoning designations in the area. They are compatible with surrounding uses and
consistent with the character of the immediate surrounding area and neighborhood.
IV. SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
Recommended Findings of Fact
As stated earli er, the overall subj ect site is approximately 8.10 acres in area and is
occupied by both a single-family residential structure and attached units. The purpose of
the proposed application is to develop new 112 attached dwelling units.
Roadways
The accepted methodology for reviewing the transportation impacts of proposed plan
amendments is based on the Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation
guidelines. The PPC's traffic generation rates have been calculated for the subject site
based on the existing and proposed FLUP categories and are included in the next table.
Maximum Dail Added Potential Tri s
Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Trips3
Volume of MLK Jr. Between Belleair Road and Lakeview
Road
LOS of Drew Street: Between Belleair Road and Lakeview
Road
7,203
8,441
7,980
-491
D
D
D
D
N/ A ~ Not Applicable
LOS ~ Level-of-Service
1 ~ Based on PPC calculations oftrips per acre per day for the Residential Urban and Institutional Land Use Categories.
2 ~ Based on PPC calculations oftrips per acre per day for the Residential Medium Future Land Use Category.
3 ~ Based on MPO K-factor of 0.095
Source: "The Rules" of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September l8, 2007 - Case LUZ2006-08006
Page 4
Item # 16
Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 8
Based on the 2005 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of
Service Report, the segment of Martin Luther King, Jr. (MLK Jr.) Avenue, Belleair Road
to Lakeview Road has a LOS ofD.
The proposed FLUP category could generate 491 less PM Peak Hour trips onto MLK Jr.
Avenue than the current FLUP category. The net decrease in trips is de minimis and the
LOS of the surrounding road network will not be impacted.
Specific uses in the current and proposed zoning districts have also been analyzed for the
level of vehicle trips that could be generated based on the Institute of Transportation
Engineer's Manual.
Existing Zoning (I) /Future Land Use Plan (I)
npsx
1,000 sq. ft.)
195,992
1,785
N/A
275
N/A
square feet
Proposed Zoning (MDR) /Future Land Use Plan (RM)
Res! entIa
Condominium/T ownhouse
103
604
-1,181
32
-243
dwelling units
The property, addressed as 802 Woodlawn Street, has an existing MDR Zoning District
designation and has a Residential Urban Future Land Use classification, with a maximum
density of nine units. The land use change to Residential Medium would allow for a
maximum density of 18 units. The total maximum density for this project (the entire site)
is 121 dwelling units.
The adjusted net decrease of average daily trips for the entire site is -1,129 trips. The
adjusted net decrease of PM Peak Trips is -240 trips.
The property has an existing single-family residential detached dwelling and eight
attached residential units which are proposed to be demolished and replaced with 112
attached workforce housing residential units. As such, the proposed plan amendment and
rezoning will not result in a degradation of the existing LOS to the surrounding road
network.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September l8, 2007 - Case LUZ2006-08006
Page 5
Item # 16
Attachment number 1
Page 6 of 8
Mass Transit
The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment.
The total miles of fixed route service will not change. The subject site is not located
directly on any mass transit route. Neighboring mass transit routes are located on South
Fort Harrison Avenue and on South Myrtle Avenue.
Water
The current FLUP category could use up to 21,850 gallons per day. Under the proposed
FLUP category, water demand could approach approximately 30,250 gallons per day.
The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for water.
Wastewater
The current FLUP category could produce up to 19,280 gallons per day. Under the
proposed FLUP category, sewer demand could approach approximately 24,200 gallons
per day. The proposed land use amendment will not negatively affect the City's current
LOS for wastewater
Solid Waste
The current FLUP category would result in the production of 532 tons of solid waste per
year. Under the proposed FLUP category, 121 residential dwellings could generate 307
tons of solid waste per year. The proposed land use and plan amendment will not
negatively affect the City's current LOS for solid waste disposal.
Recreation and Open Space
The proposed future land use plan and zoning designations will allow for the
development of up to 121 attached dwelling units. Open Space, Recreation Land and
Recreation Facility impact fees will be required when the property is developed with
residential uses. The amount and timing of this fee is dependent on the number of
developed units and will be addressed and paid during the site plan review process.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
Based upon the findings of fact, it has been determined that the traffic generated by this
plan amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing LOS to the surrounding
road network. Further, there is no impact to water, wastewater, and solid waste service.
Mass transit will not be affected by the proposed future land use plan and zoning
designations. Any impact to open space and recreation facilities will be determined at
time of site plan submittal.
V. IMPACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT [Section 4-603.F.5.]
Recommended of Findings of Fact
There are two ponds located on this property. This property has existing single-family
residential and multi-family residential structures. The proposal, if approved, will enable
the development of 121 attached dwelling units. Development upon the site will require
site plan approval. At that time, the stormwater management system will be required to
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September l8, 2007 - Case LUZ2006-08006
Page 6
Item # 16
Attachment number 1
Page 7 of 8
meet all City and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD)
stormwater management criteria.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
Based on current information, there are two ponds located on the subject site. Water
quantity and quality will be controlled in compliance with the Clearwater Comprehensive
Plan. There is an existing single-family residential structure and multi-family units on
this property. There is minimal impact to the City of Clearwater by the proposed
attached dwelling land use.
VI. LOCATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES [Section 4-602 .F.6.]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The location of the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District boundaries is
consistent with the boundaries of the subject site, which is generally rectangular. The
proposed Medium Density Residential District is compatible with the surrounding land
uses. Woodlawn Street is an east west roadway largely framed by single-family
residential land use. There are some attached dwellings located on the north side of
Woodlawn Street.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications
of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment.
VII. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS [Sections 2-302 & 4-
602.F.1. and .2.]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The proposed land use is multi family residential. While the entire site consists of 8.10
acres, the portion of the site proposed for rezoning has a lot width of approximately 620
feet and a lot area of 6.92 acres (301,527 square feet). The Medium Density Residential
zoning district minimum lot width requirement is 100 feet and the minimum lot area
requirement is 10,000 square feet for attached dwellings.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The proposed use of the subject site is consistent with the uses allowed in the Medium
Density Residential zoning district and the site meets the minimum lot width and area
requirements of the District. Approval of this land use plan amendment and zoning
district designation does not guarantee the right to develop on the subject property.
Transportation concurrency must be met, and the property owner will have to comply
with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September l8, 2007 - Case LUZ2006-08006
Page 7
Item # 16
Attachment number 1
Page 8 of 8
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An amendment of the FLUP from the Institutional (I) and Residential Urban categories to
the Residential Medium (RM) category and a rezoning from Institutional (I) District to
the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District for the subject site is requested. The site
consists of 8.10 acres (353,037 square feet) total and exceeds the minimum lot size
requirement for multi-family residential use within the Medium Density Residential
Zoning District. A predominance of single-family residential detached dwellings, some
multi-family residential units, a church, and a church office characterize the
neighborhood. The proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning is compatible
with the existing neighborhood.
The proposed Residential Medium (RM) Future Land Use Plan classification and
Medium Density Residential (MDR) zoning district are consistent with both the City and
the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not
require nor affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the natural
environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions
on the request:
ACTIONS:
a) Recommend APPROVAL of the Future Land Use Plan amendments from the
Residential Urban and Institutional (I) Classifications to the Residential Medium
(RM) Classification; and
b) Recommend APPROVAL of the rezoning from the Institutional (I) District to the
Medium Density Residential (MDR) District.
Prepared by Planning Department staff:
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III
Attachments:
Application
Location Map
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Land Use Plan Map
Zoning Map
Existing Surrounding Uses
Site Photographs
S: \Planning DepartmentlC D EILand Use AmendmentslLUZ 2006ILUZ2006-08006; 802, 826, and 830 Woodlawn Street - Woodlawn
Church of God Ed. ofTrusteeslStaffReport, LUZ2006-08006R.doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September l8, 2007 - Case LUZ2006-08006
Page 8
Item # 16
r2
Location Map
Owners:
Woodlawn Church of God
Case:
LUZ2006-08006
Site:
802,826, and 830 Woodlawn Street and an unaddressed
parcel designated os 22129/15/00000/320/0200
Property
Size(Acres):
8.10 acres
PIN:
22/29/15/00000/320/0300
22/29/15/98941/000/0001
22/29/15/00000/320/0700
22/29/15/00000/320/0200
Land Use
Zoning
From:
RU (802)
I (remainder)
MDR (802) I (remainder)
To:
RM
RM
MDR
MDR
Atlas Page:
314A
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BILand Use AmendmentsILUZ 2006ILUZ2006-08006; 802 Woodlawn Street - Woodlawn Church of God
Bd. ofTrusteeslMapslLUZ2006-08006 Map Request 2. doc
Item # 16
Attachment number 2
Page 2 of 6
-.--:.. ..,
- .. -.- .. .~.~.. .~
.~
R
"oJ. .,-:: . ..-....
!
.":: i.,
~."
, .
:,
.. .i
... ~
I. . ..:.....~.
.~.: . --:;,
: ~' ... .........-:'"
. .. .
I................................~
. .
, =
. .
I = ,. :~.",--
. .
. . .~
. .
I = ~
. .
, I
\ ~", i
. . ~: ~ .
, I.~
tlI .......... .
. . . .
.. . = .
~.. .
.;~. , =.~ : = ~-'
. . . . .
, . . . .
. . . . .
,............. .............. -.
WOODLA WH- ST
,
~:L~..,::;;. ?
.1 .~. . .
"',~'~
..y
...._~.
r .\'~
WILDWOOD WA Y
~.l"l:= ...-. ...~:~~I..
.. ~~ ~ .
.r:': "", ~:"'-...-.~
..... . '-
(f) (f) ~ II
~ ~
-<. -<. <:( ~ ,'. ' I'
';I:) ';I:) :c: "" ~ I ~. f'!
'""" '""" e <:(
r- r- >-
m m ,.
:c: I.U
')> ')> <:( .....
<. <. a:: .....
m m U j::
. . CI)
. . .,
:',
Aerial Map
Owners:
Woodlawn Church of God
Case:
LUZ2006-08006
Site:
802,826, and 830 Woodlawn Street and an unaddressed
parcel designated os 22129/15/00000/320/0200
Property
Size(Acres):
8.10 acres
PIN:
22/29/15/00000/320/0300
22/29/15/98941/000/0001
22/29/15/00000/320/0700
22/29/15/00000/320/0200
Land Use
Zoning
From:
RU (802) I (remainder)
MDR (802) I (remainder)
To:
RM
RM
MDR
MDR
Atlas Page:
314A
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BILand Use AmendmentsILUZ 2006ILUZ2006-08006; 802 Woodlawn Street - Woodlawn Church of God
Bd. ofTrusteeslMapslLUZ2006-08006 Map Request 2. doc
Item # 16
Attachment number 2
P"nA "\ nf f;
11 w~
<0 a
~ ~ ~ I
25(8)
iii
RlOS
RlOS
~~ "
5l r
~ ;;;
~ ~
\\0
,
Iii; I~ I~ I~S
1 1 I I
I~ 11 112 13 1'4 15 116
V~ 1 I
~ ~ Idlj(~,~
~ I '3 I 21 1 191 117'~
I I I I liSo
~ 1 ~ 1 I~ I~ \ 10
RM
8
8
3.96 Ac
5.29 Ac(C)
RM
"
~ I ~ I ~ I ~ \;J 13
1 I 1 1 I I I 1
I I I I 1
9 10 111 2113 114 15 11 ~7 118 119
I~IIII II
I/X '" '1"")1" I , I
I~ "i"" '
32 <o;D 1 ~ I~ ~ I" ~ 1 122
~ 1 F <0 ~ 110 ~ 6 I
1 I 1 I I <0 I", 1
I I I I 1 ~ I~ I
WOODLA WN ST fR
E
\:~~\ \~ BNl r;f ~ ~
211' ~ \VW0
'" Idl \ O:l a O:l C\J
'" '" ~"
<0 I ,.90 '" '"
(2)
c;,o
8
,j.L,j f
~.
\" U_-(
'" a
g:s cil;
- -
<0
~
"
"
fi1
"
~ ~ :if :if
, . ~j , 10;1 '"' 0;1 0; 111 40 _~_52_ 1 ...22~1_ 1-
~" 3\(5) '" 11tl04 40
<0 <0 1 \ I 1 g:s 5L 2 1504 - - 0
I '" \ r- - 5L _ .2
10 '" ',154 I :1 \121 14 - - ...20-~ ilf- -- -
1 10 I 11 13 4 15 I ~tJ 9 110:3 113 - 22 I 3
-=-~T~ - -
61 1 2 10514\ 12 I 49 4 ~
I 2 I I I 1~08 151148 - - -
1 (J) ...5:_ 48 .2.
~\1~1_ 151 ~ 6 1508 - t- -
I 1516 \ - 22 _ __ lli. - - 47 .1? 6 I!ilC
- -
(2) 55 16 .... ...!..51~6_ 7 ~ 46 I 7
;O~~" . - -
4 RU 14 _17 1516 ~ 45 8 151 45
1518 \ -\------ - - ":'51:""44 ~ 1L -
, ___5;L_ 18 9 151744 151
m 1t?.!..9 _ 22 _ _ 19 1518 ~ - - - - >- --:;:; - -!L
43 10 1516 i.u 10
5 1528.' 90 ')> 51 20 152342 11 H
42 1520
5 ~, _ _ 2Q _ _ _21_ ~22 It --- --..,J - - - 1-.11
1528A _ .3.1 _ _ 12_ ~2 i=: _41 12
9~ 6"\(S) 1f!l.5 _ 49 22 (.)
1534 40 ~3 40 ~~~~
- \ 48 ~ 23 '" _ 3@.... B 141526
- - 47 A r) 24 - 1530 1~23a_ ...14 _153!.
7 ....!52~38_ 'l9.. _ 15
\ () - - -
6 46 25 37 16 152
1540 ~ 37 16
0 ...~"" - -
Future Land Use Map
Owners:
Woodlawn Church of God
Case:
LUZ2006-08006
Site:
802,826, and 830 Woodlawn Street and an unaddressed
parcel designated os 22129/15/00000/320/0200
Property
Size(Acres):
8.10 acres
PIN:
22/29/15/00000/320/0300
22/29/15/98941/000/0001
22/29/15/00000/320/0700
22/29/15/00000/320/0200
Land Use
Zoning
From:
RU (802) I (remainder)
MDR (802) I (remainder)
To:
RM
RM
MDR
MDR
Atlas Page:
314A
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BILand Use AmendmentsILUZ 2006ILUZ2006-08006; 802 Woodlawn Street - Woodlawn Church of God
Bd. ofTrusteeslMapslLUZ2006-08006 Map Request 2. doc
Item # 16
,
OS/R
~I
l
1
<,0
'~"\
" "
o 1<0
15 : 16
!'~"\ \ l~
~ I~ I \
MDR
8
5.29 Ac (C)
"
li;Jl ~ I~ ~\\
I I 1 I
115 r :17 ra 119
I 1 I I
I I 1 I 1 \
~ Ia;. I" ~ I 122 I \
<0 ~ ~
I F pi 211 \
I I ~ I~ I ~ \dl \
I
8
3.96 Ac
MDR
A~ .m
Po.
-- ~
~ "
~ s
~ ~
r2
-
( 8
G 3.23 Ac(C)
l MDR G) GY' cp
8 ;g l!l ~ G?o 8
~ ~ I~ \ -18
" <0 <0
as as '" " ~ ~ I '" a a
'90 10 ~ g:s cil; 0;
-
iri
,. WOODLA WN ST ,.
AO \~'\ I 1101 ~\ :::\~ 1 \ 40
'" I I '" I '" '" 11 115fJ4
1 I I 1121 14
11 13 4 \ 5 16 7 1 9 1 . 1 ~ 13
12 1 18 10 -...../ \ I
I I 1508
(Jl~\!!!..II_ _ 2.6 _ 15 1512 !JJ
~ - - --:s
-< 55 16
?J~~1515_ _ !B.. _ _ _17 _ 1~6 ~
~ _ _ 23 _ _ 18 0
gO m 1~9 _ ....9,2 _ _ _ 1@.... ~18_!;;:
)> 51 20 'C(
~'\_ _ ~ _ _ _21_ ~22 0:::
1525 49 22 (.)
--- CI,)
48 If:'., 23
47 ~. 'I 24 1530
46~ 25
~~ II
<0<0
'" 1
10
1 2 I
I
3 \~(S)
10514 \
154
~
-<i
1516 \ ~
\""
1518 \ ~
1528 \6'(~
1534
1540 \ \ %
A<;
1528A
1533
Zoning Map
Owners:
Woodlawn Church of God
Site:
802,826, and 830 Woodlawn Street and an unaddressed
parcel designated os 22129/15/00000/320/0200
Land Use
Zoning
From:
RU (802)
I (remainder)
MDR (802) I (remainder)
To:
RM
MDR
RM
MDR
,.
4 I- _ 5:s... ~ _1 _ _ 4
_ 21_1_2__
- _50_ t- ;L _
49 4
- _ - ..!8- _ l-=, 5-=, -=-
_ _47_ L .2... ....!.51O
46 7
45
1~744.... _
.0
~ 52 1
~~5L- .L ~04
_ JiO _ _3 _ _
49 4
1511 48 Ji _ _
47 6 1508
..!..51~_ _ 7_ _
45 8 1512
-.!.51~_ I- 9_ _
43 10 1516
-.!5?:!, 42_ I- :11. - ..,J
_ ~1 _ 12_ !!!..20 j::
40 ~13
_]iJ \ [BJ}14i526
--.!52~38_ ~1.2. _
37 16 152
_8_ _
_9 _15~
10
_ 42_ -l 11 1520
41 --:;-? - -
~5: _~ ~~ ~24
_ou_ _ 15_ _
37 16
"
-1;-.92_
'"
51
50
- - ~
_ _48_
1511 47
- ~ -
1i?.!.5.=!.5 _
44
...!..51~_A3_
42
CI,) -~~~
--.!522. 3~
37
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BILand Use AmendmentsILUZ 2006ILUZ2006-08006; 802 Woodlawn Street - Woodlawn Church of God
Bd. ofTrusteeslMapslLUZ2006-08006 Map Request 2. doc
1/::;?O....1""
Case:
LUZ2006-08006
Property
Size(Acres):
8.10 acres
PIN:
22/29/15/00000/320/0300
22/29/15/98941/000/0001
22/29/15/00000/320/0700
22/29/15/00000/320/0200
Atlas Page:
314A
Item # 16
...
" '"
<0 "
<0
~7 8 9
13 12 11 w~
" <0 Q
"
<0 " ..,
<0 <0 <0 I
25(8)
iii
\
I~ \~ \~ \~ ~ \~\'
I I I I I I
16 '18 ~ 11112'3114 15116
~
lB ~ ~ ~ :18; \ \
ZT I 5 23 ~ 19 17
I I I I I
~I 01 ~I 1<0101
fOl I "'I I~ 1:61
WILDWOOD WA Y "
I ~ipgl ~~~ n~~,\
I IT . I . I
16 'I I' ~e-slf( tfutra1 \7 118 119
I \,F I \ I \ I \ I
I I I~ II I I' 1\
~ ~32I~OO ~I~~I~ ~I Iz2 1\
b J; ICllPI bl ZTI F 1'31 21 \
I I I I I
I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I ~ Idl \
I I.
WOODLA WN ST
~
\
iri
60 ..." I 3 ~'\B(S) \54
I.., ;,,1; <0 <0 :
...
<0
I 61 1 2 I
I- 3 I 2 10514 \
CI) 1
,
-J I Q 1516 \
UJ
:l!: 1511 4 4 1518 \
Q;:
q:
l) 1517 5 1528..\
5 1528A
~6 1J;~"I4 6\(S)
Recreational
Ballfields
8
5.29
Ac(C)
8
"
Q
co
I
G) G)0-
;g l!l ~
~ ~ 0
<0
Q
co
co "
... "
co co
,.
,.
AD ~~I I I~\:;; :;;1:;; 111 40
I I \ I 11~4
(J) I I I I I 112 I 14
1 3 5 7 91 r1i\ UJ
s:. 12 I 4 I 16 18 10 ~ 1131. :::.;
-<. ' . \ I In 150 q:
~ \ 15t: lDg!~_J LI "<I.Y5~~
~ \ !is il6 0
m~!J't.eSI 17 15161-
')> 53 18 <:
~ -1ii9~ .; ~ ~ _ 1~ 1?1~Q!2
51 20 l)
\. 50 _21_ 152 CI)
l 1525 49 - - 22 -
Existing Land Use Map
Owners:
Woodlawn Church of God
Case:
Site:
802.826. and 830 Woodlawn Street and an unaddressed
parcel designated os 22129/15/00000/320/0200
Property
Size(Acres):
Land Use
From:
RU (802) I (remainder)
To:
RM
RM
Zoning
PIN:
MDR (802) I (remainder)
MDR
MDR
Atlas Page:
Attachment number 2
Page 5 of 6
20.53
Ac
~~ &
;l r
~ S
~ ~
- ~
- -
~ ~
Mnu~ .. IlIliiv
T-.. . 11 ''';-1)
~
3.96 Ac
~w,
(2)
3
Single t 010'
~ell t~
\
co
..,
co
1'\
<0
"
co
(J)o
I--
"
,.
~ :1S :if
_1 _ _ 40 _ 2,2 ~I_ 1-
L tesQ] a milt co~ 2
~ ~ - ti fl~ ~ -:=1 =~=
:::.; I- _48_ 1 2..
47 6 150 q: -.1Z _I _ 6_
1~ ~6.... .l >- 46_r-L-
45 8 151 lu 45 8
1:!..11*!. _ 9 -J 15114 ;;-
-J---f--
43 10 1511 i=: 43 10
1~2~ _ _11 _ _ _ 42 :!l
_ 41... _ ~2 _15~ 41 12
~'\. -rr
.;;g-
~Jl.~.
5
49T".
15114
LUZ2006-08006
8.10 acres
22/29/15/00000/320/0300
22/29/15/98941/000/0001
22/29/15/00000/320/0700
22/29/15/00000/320/0200
314A
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BILand Use AmendmentsILUZ 2006ILUZ2006-08006; 802 Woodlawn Street - Woodlawn Church of God
Bd. ofTrusteeslMapslLUZ2006-08006 Map Request 2. doc
Item # 16
View looking west at Woodlawn Street, near site
View looking northwest at site at attached dwellings
View looking northeast at site from CSX Right-of-Way
Attachment number 2
Page 6 of 6
View looking north onto site
View looking south from within site
View looking north, from Woodlawn Street at existing house
LUZ2007-08006
Woodlawn Church of God
802, 826, 830 W oodla~erfif#e'~
and unaddressed parcel
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7945-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE
LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE CSX RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY AND WOODLAWN STREET, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 802 WOODLAWN STREET, 826 WOODLAWN
STREET (826 WOODLAWN STREET IS THE ENTIRE
SUBDIVISION OF WOODLAWN TERRACE I, A CONDOMINIUM
AS RECORDED IN CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK 92, PAGE 32
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY,
FLORIDA), 830 WOODLAWN STREET AND AN
UNADDRESSED PARCEL DESIGNATED AS
22/29/15/00000/320/0200, CONSISTING OF PROPERTY
LOCATED IN METES AND BOUNDS 32/02, 32/03 AND 32/07,
IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST,
FROM RESIDENTIAL URBAN (RU) AND INSTITUTIONAL (I) TO
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive
plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate,
and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of
Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described
property as follows:
Property
Land Use CateQorv
Legal Description attached
From: Residential Urban (RU) and
I nstitutional (I)
To: Residential Medium (RM)
LUZ2006-08006
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with
the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the
approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners,
and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the
applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act, pursuant to S 163.3189, Florida Statutes. The Community
Development Coordinator is authorized to transmit to the Pinellas County Planning Council an
application to amend the Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land
Use Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended by this ordinance.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
Item # 16
Ordinance No. 7945-08
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Approved as to form:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Attachment number 3
Page 2 of 2
Ordinance No7945-08
Item # 16
Attachment number 4
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7946-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED
NORTHEAST OF THE CSX RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
AND WOODLAWN STREET, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 826 WOODLAWN STREET (826
WOODLAWN STREET IS THE ENTIRE SUBDIVISION OF
WOODLAWN TERRACE I, A CONDOMINIUM AS
RECORDED IN CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK 92, PAGE 32
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY,
FLORIDA), 830 WOODLAWN STREET AND AN
UNADDRESSED PARCEL DESIGNATED AS
22/29/15/00000/320/0200, CONSISTING OF PROPERTY
LOCATED IN METES AND BOUNDS 32/02, 32/07, IN
SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST,
FROM INSTITUTIONAL (I) TO MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (MDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's Comprehensive Plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is hereby
rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
Property
Zoninq District
Legal Description attached
LUZ2006-08006
From: Institutional (I)
To: Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to
the approval of the land use designation set forth in Ordinance 7945-08 by the Pinellas
County Board of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of
Florida, as appropriate, of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant
to S163.3189, Florida Statutes.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
Item # 16
Ordinance No. 7946-08
Attachment number 4
Page 2 of 2
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 16
2
Ordinance No. 7946-08
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the Industrial Limited (IL) Classification to the Commercial General (CG)
Classification and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District to the Commercial (C)
District for property located at 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560, 1570, 1580, 1590, 1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth
Road (Lot 1, South Oaks Fashion Square, Section 09, Township 29 South, Range 16 East); and Pass Ordinances 7920-08 and 7921-08
on first reading. (LUZ2007-07005)
SUMMARY:
This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment application involves property comprising approximately 19.05 acres in area and located
at the southwest corner of the intersection of State Road 590 and McMullen Booth Road. This property, known as Bayside Bridge
Plaza, has a FLUP classification of Industrial Limited (IL) and a zoning designation of Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT). The
applicant is requesting to amend the FLUP classification of the site to the Commercial General (CG) classification and to rezone the
property to the Commercial (C) District in order to establish a FLUP classification and zoning district that are compatible with the
current uses of the property. The Planning Department determined that the proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning
amendment, as recommended, are consistent with the following standards specified in the Community Development Code: . The
proposed land use plan amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. . The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding
area. . Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property.. The applications will not have an adverse impact on the natural
environment.Please refer to the land use plan amendment and rezoning (LUZ2007 -07005) staff report for the complete analysis. The
Planning Department determined that the amendments are also consistent with the Countywide Rules concerning Mixed Use
Classifications on the Countywide Plan Map on Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridors since the Commercial General Classification is less
intense than the Industrial Limited Classification. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is
subject to the approval of the Pinellas Planning Council and the Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning
Authority. The application is a large-scale amendment and review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is
required. The Community Development Board reviewed this application at its public hearing on February 19,2008 and unanimously
recommended approval of the Future Land Use Plan amendment.
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 13
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Owner/ Appli cant:
Address:
February 19,2008
LUZ2007-07005
Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD.
1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560, 1570, 1580, 1590, 1600, 1610
and 1620 McMullen Booth Road
E-l
Agenda Item:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
REQUEST:
(a) Future Land Use Plan amendment from the Industrial
Limited (IL) Classification to the Commercial General
(CG) Classification.
(b) Rezoning from the Industrial, Research, and
Technology (IRT) District to the Commercial (C)
Di stri ct
SITE INFORMATION
PROPERTY SIZE:
829,818 square feet or 19.05 acres
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Retail Sales and Services, Restaurants, Offices, Alcoholic
Beverage Sales, Indoor RecreationlEntertainment and
Vehicle Service
Proposed Use:
Retail Sales and Services, Restaurants, Offices, Alcoholic
Beverage Sales, Indoor RecreationlEntertainment and
Vehicle Service
PLAN CATEGORY:
Current Category:
Proposed Category:
Industrial Limited (IL)
Commercial General (CG)
ZONING DISTRICT:
Current District:
Proposed District:
Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT)
Commercial (C)
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 -Page 1 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 13
EXISTING
SURROUNDING USES:
North: Office, Medical Clinic, Veterinary Office, Animal
Boarding and Retail Sales and Services
West: Attached Dwellings
South: Self Storage
East: Retail Sales and Services and Restaurants
ANALYSIS:
This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves property
comprising approximately 19.05 acres in area located at the southwest corner of McMullen
Booth Road and State Road 590 (Northeast Coachman Road). This property has a FLUP
classification of Industrial Limited (IL) and a zoning designation of Industrial, Research and
Technology (IRT). The applicant is requesting to amend the FLUP classification of the site to
the Commercial General (CG) classification and to rezone the property to the Commercial (C)
District. The amendments will make the FLUP and Zoning Atlas consistent with the historical
use of the property. The property consists of a 164,995 square foot shopping center, a 3,390
square foot office (Bank of America), a 710 square foot restaurant (Checkers), and a 6,105
square foot vehicle service use (Tires Plus).
The initial development of the shopping center occurred in 1989 at which time the property was
zoned Industrial Planned Development (IPD) and had a future land use classification of
Industrial. Pursuant to the zoning code in effect at the time of the development [ref.: Section
13 1. 104(d)(3)], "commercial, office, and industrial planned districts would permit such uses in a
manner so as to allow for improved arrangement of retail, professional and business office or
industrial use, or combination thereof'; therefore, the mix of uses that currently exist on the
subj ect property were permissible. Subsequent to the development of the shopping center, the
zoning on the property was changed to Limited Industrial (IL), which allowed "indoor retail
sales" as a permitted use [ref.: Section 40.503]. The office, restaurant and vehicle service uses
also in existence were also permitted uses at this time.
Upon the adoption of the Community Development Code (CDC) in 1999, all property that had
been zoned IL was reclassified as IRT. This reclassification occurred regardless of what the
actual existing use of the property was, or what the prior zoning district allowed as permitted
uses. As a result of this rezoning, the existing retail sales and services use became a
nonconforming use, and the provisions of CDC Section 6-103 governing nonconforming uses
became applicable.
At the January 15, 2008 Community Development Board meeting, the Board reviewed a request
for Flexible Development approval for termination of status as a nonconformity for a retail sales
and service use (shopping center) within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District
pursuant to CDC Section 6-109 along with a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to
CDC Section 3-1202.G. The Board approved this application on consent with two conditions,
relating to landscaping and general engineering approval.
The IL future land use designation permits a floor area ratio of 0.65 but no residential or
overnight accommodation density. The proposed CG classification permits a floor area ratio of
0.55. It also permits 24 dwelling units and 40 overnight accommodations per acre. The current
IRT zoning designation primarily permits industrial, office and manufacturing uses. The
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 2 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 13
proposed C zoning designation primarily permits retail sales and services, offices, restaurants
and overnight accommodations.
The property is larger than the minimum required lot area and lot width for the existing uses in
the C District. All existing uses are permitted in the C District except for Vehicle Service. The
property currently has an Impervious Surface Ratio of 0.53, which is lower that the CG
maximum of 0.90. The CG permits a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.55. The property has an
existing FAR of 0.21.
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the FLUP amendment is subject to approval by
the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide
Planning Authority. Based on the size of the parcel, review and approval by the Florida
Department of Community Affairs is required.
I. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN [Section 4-
602.F.l and Section 4-603.F.l and 2]
Recommended Findings of Fact
Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan in support
of the proposed land use plan amendment are as indicated below:
2.2 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned
development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill
development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment.
2.2.1 Policy - On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan
approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned
developments that are compatible.
3.2.3 Policy - Commercial land uses shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector
streets and should be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts
into residential neighborhoods. New plats and site plans shall discourage the creation of
"strip commercial" zones by insuring that adequate lot depths are maintained and by
zoning for commercial development at major intersections.
7.4 Objective - The City shall specifically consider the existing and planned Level-of-
Service on the road network affected by a proposed development, when considering an
amendment to the land use map, rezoning, subdivision plat, or site plan approval.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The existing uses developed on the site are compatible with the surrounding area. Land uses
within the surrounding area include attached dwellings, offices, restaurants, retail sales and
services, animal boarding, and self storage. This property is located at the intersection of an
arterial street and is 770 feet deep. The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 3 of!3
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 13
II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN
Recommended Findings of Fact
The purpose of the proposed Commercial General classification category, as specified in Section
2.3.3.5.4 of the Countywide Rules, is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed,
or appropriate to be developed, in a manner designed to provide community and countywide
commercial goods and services; and to recognize such areas as primarily consistent with the
need, relationship to adjoining uses and with the objective of encouraging a consolidated,
concentrated commercial center providing for the full spectrum of commercial uses.
The property is located at the southwest comer of the McMullen Booth Road and State Road 590
intersection. The Countywide Plan Map lists McMullen Booth as a Primary ScenicINon-
Commercial Corridor and this intersection is listed as on the Countywide Plan Map as a Mixed
Use Classification.
Section 4.2.7.1.2 of the Countywide Rules states: The intent and purpose of the
ScenicINon-Commercial Corridor designation is to guide the preservation and
enhancement of scenic qualities, to ensure the integrity of the Countywide Plan Map and
to maintain and enhance the traffic operation of these especially significant roadway
corridors in Pinellas County.
The principal objectives of ScenicINon-Commercial Corridor designations are:
A. To preserve and enhance scenic qualities found along these corridors and to foster
community awareness of the scenic nature of these corridors.
B. To encourage superior community design and enhanced landscape treatment, both
outside of and within the public right-of-way.
C. To encourage land uses along these corridors which contribute to an integrated, well
planned and visually pleasing development pattern, while discouraging the
proliferation of commercial, office, industrial or intense residential development
beyond areas specifically designated for such uses on the Countywide Plan Map.
D. To assist in maintaining the traffic operation of roadways within these corridors
through land use type and density/intensity controls, and by conformance to access
management regulations, by selective transit route location, and by the development
of integrated and safe pedestrian and bicycle access systems.
E. To encourage design standards identified within the "Pinellas County Countywide
ScenicINon-Commercial Corridor Master Plan" through the adoption of local
ordinances and regulations consistent with those standards set forth within the Master
Plan.
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 4 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.I.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 13
Section 4.2.7.1A.B.2 of the Countywide Rules states:
Mixed Use, Commercial, or Industrial Countywide Plan Map Classifications - With
regard to Mixed Use, Commercial or Industrial Countywide Plan Map classifications:
a. The extent to which the local government request discourages non-residential uses on
a ScenicINon-Commercial Corridor. In particular, amendment to the Countywide
Plan Map to allow a new or expanded Mixed Use, Commercial or Industrial category
shall be discouraged, except where such amendment is:
1. the logical in-fill, extension or terminus of an existing non-residential
classification; and
11. the logical in-fill, extension or terminus of an adjoining existing non-
residential use; and
111. considered in relationship to the existing delineation of surrounding categories
on the Countywide Plan Map and Corridor Subclassification(s); and
IV. consistent with the purpose and intent of the ScenicINon-Commercial
Corridor Plan Element as applied through these Countywide Rules and the
otherwise applicable amendment process.
This criterion is not applicable since the FLUP amendment will not expand the area of the Mixed
Use category.
b. The extent to which the local government request mInImIZeS any increase in
density/intensity on a ScenicINon-Commercial Corridor. Specifically, in reviewing
any application for non-residential use on a ScenicINon-Commercial Corridor, the
proposed density/intensity of use as measured by dwelling units per acre, floor area
ratio and impervious surface ratio, as is applicable, shall be considered with the
objective of not exceeding the density/intensity of either the adjoining non-residential
uses or the mid-point of the range for the density/intensity standards of the applicable
category, whichever is less.
This request will decrease the permitted FAR from 0.65 to 0.55. This request is consistent with
the Countywide Rules in that it will decrease allowable intensities on a ScenicINon-Commercial
Corridor. The FLUP classification to the west is Residential High (RR), which permits 30
dwelling units per acre. This classification's residential density exceeds the CG residential
density or 24 units per acre.
The site is located at the intersection of McMullen Booth Road (County Road 611) and State
Road 590 (Northeast Coachman Road). McMullen Booth Road is a six lane major arterial with
turn lanes. The City shares jurisdiction of the road with Safety Harbor. State Road 590 is a two-
lane road that extends west from Safety Harbor to the Intracoastal Waterway. Due to the site's
proximity to a major arterial and an east/west route, this area is well suited for the existing
development, which serves a countywide market. The subject property is also located along a
PSTA route, which encourages the use of mass transit.
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 5 on3
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.586I.I.LUZ2007-07005 Stall' Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 6 of 13
It should be noted that the Updated Countywide Plan for Pinellas County states in Position
Statement 13.1: "Limit the conversion of parcels designated for manufacturing and high-tech
businesses, e.g., Industrial General or Industrial Limited, to other designations." In 1989, the
property had a future land use classification of Industrial. The property was developed
consistent with the permitted uses within the IPD zoning district and Industrial future land use
classification. The IPD district permitted retail and commercial uses. The City is of the opinion
that this parcel was never intended for industrial or manufacturing use.
Except for two small properties (limited vehicle services) located on the east side of McMullen
Booth approximately 200 feet north of the subj ect property and the property located to the south
of the subject property, no other properties in Pinellas County along McMullen Booth Road have
an industrial future land use classification.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the purpose and locational characteristics of the
Countywide Plan; therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with the Countywide Plan.
Also, the plan amendment is consistent with the mixed use designation of the scenic non-
commercial corridor and is not a prime area for industrial development. It is consistent with
development patterns in this vicinity and along the McMullen Booth Corridor.
III. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY/CHARACTER OF THE
CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD [Section 4-602.F.2 and 3 and Section 4-603.F.3]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The subject property is located on the southwest comer of the intersection of McMullen Booth
Road and State Road 590. This area is characterized by a variety of land uses. To the north
across State Road 590, is a medical clinic complex with a FLUP classification of
Residential/Office Limited (RlOL) and an Office (0) zoning designation. This classification
permits 7.5 dwelling units per acre and an FAR of 0.40. The 0 designation primarily permits
office and medical clinic uses. Also to the north is an animal boarding use. This property has a
FLUP classification of Institutional (I) and a zoning designation of Institutional (I). The I FLUP
classification permits 12.5 dwelling units per acre and a FAR of 0.65. The I zoning designation
primarily permits places of worship, schools, and residential equivalents (assisted living
facilities, congregate care, etc.). Residential equivalents permit 3.0 beds per dwelling unit. A
dry cleaner exists to the north of the property. Its property has a FLUP classification of
Commercial Neighborhood (CN) and a zoning designation of C.
To the west is an attached dwelling use, Bayridge Apartments. In 2002, a FLUP amendment was
approved from the IL to Residential High (RR). The property has a zoning designation of
Medium High Density Residential (MHDR). The RR classification permits 30 dwelling units
per acre. The MHDR designation primarily permits attached dwelling uses.
To the south are railroad tracks. South of the railroad tracks is a self storage use. The property
has a FLUP classification ofIL and a zoning designation ofIRT.
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 6 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 7 of 13
To the east, across McMullen Booth Road, is Safety Harbor. The property has a Safety Harbor
FLUP classification of CG and a zoning designation of C-IA. The C-IA zoning designation
primarily permits retail sales and services, offices and restaurants. The lots adjacent to
McMullen Booth Road are developed as restaurants, retail sales and services and an automotive
service station.
The CG and C boundaries are appropriately located along McMullen Booth Road and State Road
590. This request will eliminate the nonconforming uses on the site except the vehicle service
use. This request is compatible with the surrounding area and does not conflict with the needs
and character of the area. Also, this request will not adversely or unreasonable affect the use of
the property in the area.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The proposed FLUP classification and zoning designation are in character with the overall FLUP
categories in the area. The amendments are compatible with the CN, CG, RlOL and I FLUPs to
the north and consistent with the CG classification to the east across McMullen Booth Road.
The corridor does have three other properties with IL classification but the uses, limited vehicle
service and self storage, are commercial uses. These properties are not significant in size either.
The proposed amendments are compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the
character of the immediate surrounding area and neighborhood.
IV. SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES [Section 4-602.F.6 and Section 4-
603.F.4]
Recommended Findings of Fact
As stated earlier, the overall subject site is approximately 19.05 acres in area and is developed as
a shopping center. Under the current FLUP category of IL, 539, 381 square feet of industrial
uses are permitted. Based on a maximum permitted development potential in the proposed CG
category, 456,399 square feet of shopping center could be potentially constructed on this site.
The PPC Rules would also allow up to 457 dwelling units. However the proposed C zoning
would only allow residential development as part of a mixed use development. Please note that
by Countywide Rules, a mixed use development "Shall not exceed, in combination, the
respective number of units per acre and floor area ratio permitted, when allocated in their
respective proportion to the gross land area of the property." This Countywide Rule will not
allow a site to be developed to the maximum of each density and intensity. Only a proportionate
share, based on land area devoted to each use, of each density and intensity can be developed.
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 7 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 8 of 13
Roadways
The accepted methodology for reviewing the transportation impacts of the proposed plan
amendment is based on the Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation guidelines. The
PPC's traffic generation rates have been calculated for the subject site based on the existing and
proposed Future Land Use Plan categories and are included in the following table.
Maximum Daily Added Potential Trips
Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Trips
Volume of McMullen Booth Road - Between Gulf
to Bay and Main Street
LOS of McMullen Booth Road - Between Gulf to
Bay and Main Street
N/ A ~ Not Applicable LOS ~ Level-of-Service
1 ~ Based on PPC calculations of 170 trips per acre per day for the Industrial Limited Future Land Use Category.
2 ~ Based on PPC calculations of 465 trips per acre per day tor the Commercial General Future Land Use Category.
3 ~ Based on MPO K-factor of 0.095.
4 ~ Based on the Florida Department of Transportation's Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas Table 4-1
Source: The Countywide Plan Rules
N/A
N/A
66,350
3,239
308
69,589
8,858
842
75,208
5,619
534
5,619
D
E
E
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 8 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Statf Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 9 of 13
Specific uses in the current and proposed zoning districts have been analyzed for the number of
vehicle trips that could be generated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip
Generation ih Edition.
Existing IRT
District / IL FLUP
Existing Shopping
Center1
(42.94 trips/l,OOO sf gfa)
Manufacturing
(3.82 tri s/l,OOO sf a)
Maximum
Development
Potential
175,200 sf
N/A
657
N/A
7,523
3.75
Proposed C District/
CG FLUP
Hotel Rooms
(8.17 trips/unit)
Shopping Center
(42.94 trips/l,OOO sf gfa)
Residential Units
(5.86 trips/unit)
Office Park
(1.64 trips/l,OOO sf gfa)5 456,399 748 -6,775
1 = Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 7 Edition Land Use 820
2 = Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 7th Edition Land Use 140
3 = Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 7th Edition Land Use 310
4 = Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 7th Edition Land Use 230
5 = Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 7th Edition Land Use 750
6 = Total number of hotel rooms permitted by the underlying CG FLUP category is 40 units per acre.
7 = Total gross floor area ratio permitted by the underlying CG FLUP category is 0.55.
8 = Total dwelling units per acre permitted by the underlying CG FLUP category is 24 units per acre.
Maximum
Development
Potential
457 rooms6
3,733
-3,790
0.59
270
-387
456,399 sf7
19,597
12,074
3.75
1,711
1,054
762 units8
4,465
-3,058
0.52
396
-261
1.50
685
28
The 2007 Transportation Level of Service (LOS) manual from the Pinellas County Metropolitan
Planning Organization assigned the McMullen Booth Road facility from Gulf to Bay Boulevard
to Main Street an LOS of D and the State Road 590 (NE Coachman Road) facility from US 19
North to McMullen Booth Road an LOS of A. The traffic analysis above compares the expected
traffic generated by the existing uses of the subject property, maximum manufacturing use and
the maximum development potential allowed by the proposed C District and CG FLUP. Based
on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a shopping center
developed at the absolute maximum intensity, 456,399 square feet, in the C District would result
in an increase in the PM Peak trips to McMullen Booth Road and State Road 590 by 1,054
vehicle trips. The Engineering Department has concluded that the traffic generation associated
with the most intense use (456,399 square foot shopping center) may increase the existing PM
peak hour trips on McMullen Booth Road and State Road 590. In such a case, the Engineering
Department would require the applicant to submit to the City a Traffic Impact Analysis because
the expected trip volumes from the shopping center exceeds the City's threshold of 100 vehicles
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 9 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 10 of 13
per hour and/or 1,000 vehicles per day. At this time, staff cannot determine the specific impacts
to the LOS of both facility segments if the site were to be redeveloped to the maximum. A
Traffic Impact Analysis would be required to determine the impacts to each facility segment.
Should the Traffic Impact Analysis indicate that mitigation measures are necessary, appropriate
action would be taken by the City to ensure implementation of the mitigation measures. The
City's Comprehensive Plan does not permit roadways to operate below an LOS of D at the PM
peak hour. In the event that the site is ever redeveloped, transportation concurrency must be met
and the LOS ofD must be maintained.
The City's Engineering Department has concluded that if the property was to be redeveloped as
overnight accommodations only, the PM Peak trips could decrease 6.14% from the existing
6,303 vehicle trips per hour to 5,916 vehicle trips per hour. Should this redevelopment happen,
the LOS for both McMullen Booth Road and State Road 590 are unlikely to change.
The City's Engineering Department has concluded that if the property was to be redeveloped as
office park only, the PM Peak trips could increase 0.44% from the existing 6,303 vehicle trips
per hour to 6,331 vehicle trips per hour. Should this redevelopment happen, the LOS for both
McMullen Booth Road and State Road 590 are unlikely to change.
Mass Transit
The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The
total miles of fixed route service will not change. The subject site is located directly on the mass
transit route along McMullen Booth Road.
Water
The City has sufficient permitted volume to provide potable water to the property. This
verification, completed by the City's Engineering Department, is based upon review of permitted
capacities and current usage of water. Any required infrastructure modifications in the vicinity
of the subject property to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements shall be
completed at the property owner's expense. Review will be completed during the site plan
approval process. These amendments will not negatively impact the City's current LOS for
water since there is excess capacity.
Wastewater
The City has sufficient permitted volume to provide wastewater service to the property. This
verification, completed by the City's Engineering Department, is based upon review of permitted
capacities and current treatment of water. Any required infrastructure modifications in the
vicinity of the subject property to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements
shall be completed at the property owner's expense. Review will be completed during the site
plan approval process. These amendments will not negatively impact the City's current LOS for
wastewater since there is excess capacity.
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 10 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 11 of 13
Solid Waste
The proposed FLUP amendment will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for solid waste
disposal.
Recreation and Open Space
Due to the fact that the site is developed, the payment of Open Space, Recreation Land and
Recreation Facility impact fees will not be required at this time. Should the site be redeveloped,
the fees will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
Based upon the findings of fact, it has been determined that the traffic generated by this plan
amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing LOS to the adjacent roads beyond
the requirements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Further, there will be no impact to water,
wastewater, and solid waste service since the maximum FAR permitted under CG is less than the
maximum FAR under the IL designation. Open space and recreation facilities and mass transit
will not be affected by the proposed future land use plan category.
V. IMPACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT [Section 4-603.F.5.]
Recommended of Findings of Fact
No wetlands appear to be located on the subject site. This property is developed as a shopping
center and has trees located in landscape islands and perimeter buffers.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
Based on current information, no wetlands appear to be located on the subj ect site. The intent of
the new buyer is to legalize a non-conforming use primarily for financing purposes. The site is
currently developed. Any redevelopment would require compliance with the City's tree
preservation and storm water management requirements.
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page II of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.I.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 12 of 13
VI. LOCATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES [Section 4-602.F.6.]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The location of the proposed Commercial District boundaries is consistent with the boundaries of
the subject property, which is generally rectangular. The proposed Commercial District is
compatible with the surrounding mixture of uses.
The location of the proposed C District boundaries is logical and consolidates this property into
the appropriate zoning district. The C zoning district is a compatible district with the adjacent 0,
C, I, MHDR, IRT and C-IA (Safety Harbor) zoning districts located to the immediate north,
south, east and west.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of
streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An amendment of the FLUP from the IL classification to the CG classification for the subject
site and rezoning from the IRT to the C District is requested. The proposed site is developed as a
175,200 square foot shopping center. The request permits the existing uses, except vehicle
service, to be conforming. The property exceeds the minimum lot area and width requirements
for retail sales and services, restaurants, offices, alcoholic beverage sales and indoor
recreation/entertainment. A mix of nonresidential and residential uses characterizes the
surrounding area. The proposed future land use plan amendment is compatible with the existing
area.
While recognizing that the Updated Countywide Plan for Pinellas County calls for limiting the
conversion of parcels designated for manufacturing and high-tech businesses, the proposed CG
FLUP more closely represents the actual and historical use of the parcel, and therefore, meets the
intent of the policy. Additionally, there is no pattern of IL along the Scenic Commercial
Corridor. In all other ways, the proposed CG FLUP classification is consistent with both the
City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, Countywide Rules pertaining to
ScenicINonCommercial Corridors, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not degrade
public services below acceptable levels, is compatible with the natural environment and is
consistent with the development regulations of the City.
Approval of this land use plan amendment does not guarantee the right to develop on the
subject property. Transportation concurrency must be met, and the property owner will have to
comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested.
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 12 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 1
Page 13 of 13
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the
request:
ACTION:
Recommend APPROVAL of the Future Land Use Plan amendment from the Industrial Limited
Classification to Commercial General Classification and rezoning request from the Industrial,
Research and Technology designation to the Commercial designation
Prepared by Planning Department staff:
Steven Everitt, Planner II
Attachments:
Resume
Application
Location Map
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Future Land Use Plan Map
Zoning Map
Existing Surrounding Land Use Map
Site Photographs
Community Development Board - February 19, 2008 - Case LUZ2007-07005 - Page 13 of 13
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\PDFConvert.5861.1.LUZ2007-07005 Staff Report.doc
Item # 17
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 6
.._..~
J IlR ---J.J -0
=;;J~ 0 n ~0
=J~ w ~~H
::l 0-
- CI) z
w
1----- I ~ IIR )~
Sf ~ JO....
I I~~
.;::.:~
'J
.::.::j
:.1
.,
s:::
m
m
o
Z
s: FUNf m N ;
~~"":
01 FUNT UR "
...p
:::j~
:. w.
.tl:
:.,S:
"'0
.:I~
.:i~
.....
)
Rd E d.eId Hal D.-
Location Map
Owners: Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD. Case: LUZ2007 -07005
1520 McMullen Booth Road 1500, 1510, 1520, Property
Site: 1530,1540,1550,1560,1570,1580,1590,1600, Size(Acres): 19.05
1 f, 10 onrl 1 f,?O Mr:MI Jllp.n P,()()th R()orl
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 09/29/16/84343/000/0010
From: IL IRT
To: CG C Atlas Page: 274A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\LUZ 2007\LUZ2007-07005 - 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560,1570,
1580,1590,1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth - Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD\Maps\Location Map.doc tem # 17
Attachment number 2
Page 2 of 6
Aerial Photograph
Owners:
Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD.
1500,1510,1520,1530,1540,1550,1560,1570,
1580, 1590, 1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen
P,()()th R()orl
Case:
LUZ2007 -07005
Site:
Property
Size(Acres):
19.05
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 09/29/16/84343/000/0010
From:
IL
IRT
To:
CG
C
Atlas Page:
274A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\LUZ 2007\LUZ2007-07005 - 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560,1570,
1580,1590,1600,1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth - Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD\Maps\Aerial Photograph.doc tem # 17
I
\
\. 0 \
..... \ \
R/O( \A \
\ \
; C \ ~ \
\ ~..... \\
\. /..> B ,..>.-'"
<" /~-
\.. C619 ~
a
"
a
'"
SR 590
;:;
a
'"
~~~D 2978 ~~~~
2991 2976 2997 1590 1580
2974 1620
2972
2962 2970 2980 1570
~~gg 2968 ~~~
SF~
1560
tdt8t8 ~~~~~~ SEE PLATF~bf~~~IONS
~e5g; 23ffi~~~~ 1550
NNN td td td d!i~@ 301-342 CG
""''','
<0 <0<0 ~~~ " ""
~~
tdtdtd~~ ~ 1540
tdtdtdtd ,- - --,
&~~~ &3C5;:j~O'l()) ~3~ --.J
tdtd~~~~ RHZ 1530
~~ $:iwOl-.J<O
~2l 1j~1 Ij(.!l ~b5
"" "
~~~ 5012536
1485
<.9<~.9::ifoS?s>
<\'9 {?
1520 1500
<.9~p$'G> 601-642
1510
1ft€6 R~
1463 ~~~
1ft~1 1461
1610
1600
,-,
~8~ --1 0
. ,1'1:....
.... -L;....
G)::@::..::
~ .. ... ..
8 ....-:.....;". ...:
'" .:...."
" ......"".
Future Land Use Map
Owners:
Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD.
1500,1510,1520,1530,1540,1550,1560,1570,
1580, 1590, 1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen
Case:
Property
Size(Acres):
Site:
Land Use
Zoning
Attachment number 2
Page 3 of 6
. . ..... - .... .... .~l." - . ..... .......
"..:":>;".:"::::-:"0:::.:"..::.:.:. .:~..". 'M!.~.,,:.; ::;......... :-:. ....::.:..:
.'.""""1" .,., '"
.. . ..
... .. ... -.. . . .
.......:....... ........ .. :".
. - . .
.... .. .
. . .. .... .
.. .. . - .... .... .... .
. .. -. .
... ..... .
"."." ........ ." ."." "..
.... . ....
. ... ..... . ..
. ... . . - .
- ... . . .. ... .
........-.:.... .... ..........
.". .". .." . .". .". ,
.,"i,...,.,.. . ., "i,... 1>
...... ...... ...... -
.::_':::::::::.i//i:::::.:.;:::li:.:.:. ::.\::/.i/' ~ ~ .:. i
:.: -~:.: :.:..:.::.: ::..: .:..:~'.:::. ::..: ::.:: : .~:.: :.:..:.::.: ::..:. ~ ~ :..: :..
-. . .... ...... , ...
. ...-.... .. . ....
.. . ..
. .... ........... .... .... - ...
- .. ... .. ....... ....... ...
. -.... ... - . ..
..;~. )::;.:;:.:: ::;..:..:i:i ':1.:<.:::' i )::;<:.:: :::..:..:i:i ': ::::<-:::':"-;:. )::~.:;:.:: :::..:..
..... .... . ..... -. ......
..... ... .. ...
. .. . .. . . .. .. .....
......................~.......
:;;ji~:~),i,,'i":',',:'::!i~,',,:~
... ... ......
..... ..... ..... .....
..... .-.... ..-...,......-.... ...... ............
. .. ..... -.."'.... .. -.... .......
f.1-.;:.::.::..:..:....:::: t.; :<;:.:::.:.:.:::.;:.::.::..:..:....:::: ;.:.t::~;::~.:.:.:
..... :..:::'i:.:-::..::.:.......:.:..-.:::......::::
. ... .............
. .....
211(i~::;: ;:.:.: ::':..::..;:::..;.; ...: .:.~::; :'.'.:;:.:.:.:::'~..::..; ::..;.; ...:.
......_....~................
.. .. ... ... ... .... ... -....... .....
o"jI'i:: H:::,': .:.:':::::::r:::.:::'J:'::::t:~:tr:.:.:.:;.::::':::..:::':::i,: ;:".:r:,:
,.., .0... .. .
1.1. !~.:.;.r .:.:.i: .:: ~:.;i:;~~~:~\\:\ :. :./: :.:. ..... ~.i::':: \:.
:I:!.. . ..... .. ... . ... ..
b li':::'::,:[:),;I'::[:,:,:: [:'i':
O . . .'"'7< ... . ... ... ..
i::;:: ::.:. ,,,,.~::./::...':.:.':..:,::,,.,.,,,'.:-,:.: :.:.:.::.,'
CD . I .... . . ... .
;: :.:. ::.: .:.::--:..: :::::: : :.: .:..::-:.:.:.::-.:.. . ::::::
~ ~:l:':::::;:',l,::::,:::: ::'[j
~ .. .'465.. .... ... .
I.; :.'. :;:;..-".';:.::.:;.:.;",::.'-:;:;:,<.-.:;. ::;:..:
=>00 .... ..... ......:........:.:.:..:-:: :.:...:
t:: ..:.. >::..'.=-:..::,.:::::::<:. :.:.::..>::..:.:. .:::.::.
-=:::: - ...~ .... ....
~ ... ~..... .
o i:::':: \: :.:.}1~.:.\..:.-:.:;:::::.:::::...:::.':-::.:.::::i::::>i:::.:<::,:
~ !. .. ..
.. .. . . .... ..
. .. . .
" , '" '"
. - .
... .... ..
.. .: ::..... ...::...::.:.... . ...::::.:::.
. .
.... .. . ..-: ........ ..:.. ...:. ..... ....
.. . ....... . . - .. - ....
....... . ... .. ..
:z..::, .: :,:.:"-.. .,;....-..-:.::,:...::::.,:..,;-.;;;:-:.:
~;::.: ..:':., ,.:: :.:::~..::.:.:.:-.:.:::::i,.:::.:..:-:-:ii)::~.i:::::-.:..
. . .J... .. -. ........
:. .': :'.... : 1\.:1:::' i':: ::{: ;:i:.i:::;.::i/::i,::::i :::.::ii ::{: i:; :..i:"::":::'::
I:.: ..: .:.:...::.:~:.::::/.:.:.:..::::.:..:.:.:-:.:.:...::.:::..-:2.?r:..:.:
. ..... .........-... .
.. .. ..... ........ ...
. -. . . .
I... ........_....,.. :...... ........ . .0.,7..'..
I:: :: ;.:.;::..;:'..:.,";:-::.-..:-:::;:.:::.;.:.;:-,.~~..:.,";:-::.
. .... .- ......- .
190 ::-: .: :.:..:::.~::..:::._..:.:-:..:.: :.:..:::..-::..:::.
..::: .: :':.::.>::.::::.;;i:.::::::.:.:.:-:-:':.::>::.:>:.;;i
.. .".", ",., .", .", "
. .. .. . .
... .... ... -.. ........ ...... ...... ....
. . .. . . .
..1.. .. ...-:... ....-.... ..:.... ....:...::..
. .... . -.. .-.... .
.. .
. . . ....
. ... . -.. . .... . ....
.. . . ... .... -... .. .....
-. . .... . ... . . -.. ...
i::;: 'i... ...':.:._:......... .,:. - .;.:,:.
200~ ~.... _.::.:......-..::..........
"-
1393 "
LUZ2007 -07005
19.05
From:
IRT
PIN: 09/29/16/84343/000/0010
IL
To:
CG
Atlas Page:
C
274A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\LUZ 2007\LUZ2007-07005 - 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560,1570,
1580,1590,1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth - Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD\Maps\Future Land Use Map.doc tem # 17
Attachment number 2
Page 4 of 6
:T.JOHNDR
/" \ \
I \\./ \
"\ A \
\ c \ \ \
h ~ /\\ J
'-{..>.... B .,.>V
(" ......
/r--*
\.0 ~619 --1
c
08)
I
a
"
a
'"'
;:;
a
'"'
SR 590
2987 2978 ~33~
2989 1622
2991 2976 2997 1620
2974 1618
2972 1616
2962 2970 2980 1614
2982
~fjgg 2968 2984 1612
1590 1580
1620
101
1570
1560
1610
t8 t8 t8
~ e58;
~~ ~~ ~ ~
23ffi~~~~
SEE PLATF2rJP-.~3!fIO NS
1550
NN~ ~~~ ~~~
<g<g0'l ~153~ C'\JC'\JC'\J
~~D ~~~~~
tdrJ~~\5-..l-..l-..l-..l-..l
&~~~ O'laN.{:::..O'lQ)
301-342
c
1600
1540
,--,
~3~ --1
N
<0
2j
1j~1
1485
tdtdtdtd~~
$:i(j(]-..l<.o
MlfDR
1530
1487 ~:;J
)~~l ~~~
<~1ttf::::f/a
501'536
~~~
~;~~
1500
1520
<~~t'G>
601-642
1510
1463 R~1B
3 1466 ~~~
1fi66 1467
1467
,--,
~8~ --.J
o
~
1371
Zoning Map
Owners:
Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD.
1500,1510,1520,1530,1540,1550,1560,1570,
1580, 1590, 1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen
P,()()th R()orl
Case:
Property
Size(Acres):
Site:
Land Use
Zoning
Cl
ll::
~
o
o
IXl
:;!:
UJ
-.l
S
~
'"
~
... .. .. -. .....
. ... ..
:::: ::":::-:-:".: :":: :~j..--:..-:...:.::: ::":::-:-:".: :":: :":.:-:.::.":
':.:"::: ::::::;:::::.::.;..".: :::::~:;::::_..:.
" ':ji!!~:':i,'i,!!:::;f,;i,':
:::..:.... ...;.:::.-.........::: ...:......._;.: 21,0:1,.;"..
~'l .::":1:..;:; :;:..::..:.:...,: '....:..:..:..:..:.::.......;:;:..::..: :.:':. ::.:.:
::~:rl:::.H :;~::lf:~:.:~:::::::::.: ::.~~::.:::.;: .(:.:::;:::H:
:~i :I~ ::\:::. :..;.:: ){~i.:*ii0f\:::.:::..;.~:){ i.).:~:i:::
:::: : ~ .:. :..:.:;.::.:~. .:~.~:.::::(i..~ ~ .:.:. :..: .:;.:: ~. .:.:':' i:.
.. ... ..M75.... . .-. ............-.
!'!i::: ii:::!;,i'i:;:ii.':::i:::':::
T. .....~.,...-...... ....,-,.
il::: i'~~~'\::':::':;i:'is
il:.::::; ::":l;~.~~ i-u.:: ::i.,\:' .;': .:.i:.;::.:/.:::.'.,;::;'.:.:' :i:.:.H,
1377
/
/
I
I
"-
139I'-711f
PHA~ fIg~ \~-'
~n\
1.1Rfi
LUZ2007 -07005
19.05
From:
IRT
PIN: 09/29/16/84343/000/0010
IL
To:
CG
Atlas Page:
C
274A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\LUZ 2007\LUZ2007-07005 - 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560,1570,
1580,1590,1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth - Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD\Maps\Zoning Map.doc tem # 17
Animal
...." \\ \
I \\./ \
"\ A \
\ \ \ \
herter~ .... \\ J
\...>.... B .,.>V
(" r-rn
./ *
\.0 ~619 --1
08)
"
..,
'"
..,
'"
....
'"
..,
~~n 2978 ~~~~ 1622
2976 1620
2974 1618
2972 1616
~~u ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~
1620
Ol
...
"
'"
..,
SR 590
1590 1580
101
1570
1560
1610
1'o)NNNN ~
NNN c,oc.oc,oc.oc.oc,o
~~~ ~~~~~-...
....WU1 .....NO
N~ t6t6t6 ~~~
~~ ~~~ NNN
NN 1'o)N N~~ ~~~
~~ ~~ ~.......... ...............
000 N-I:lro.
, SEE PLATF20'~.'f6"NS
1550 Shopping Center
1540
,--,
~3~ --1
1600
N Nt6t6t6t6t6
~ ~:1~~~~
Wun '1\~ ~
~ <- <.ll<.ll
<.ll<- ~;9.9 3'6'3'0>
0>(7< .,.
401 -44 2
1530
501-536
1520
1500
<d$9}t~~
1~it, ..,..0>
\~~\ \461 ~
Multi Family
Residential
601-642
1510
,--,
C"'- ~ 0
1371
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Attachment number 2
Page 5 of 6
~
:t
...
o
o
'\l
Iii
..,J
5
lO
"
lO
1377 /
/
/
/
I
I
Owners: Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD. Case: LUZ2007 -07005
1500,1510,1520,1530,1540,1550,1560,1570, Property
Site: 1580, 1590, 1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Size(Acres): 19.05
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 09/29/16/84343/000/0010
From: IL IRT
To: CG C Atlas Page: 274A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\LUZ 2007\LUZ2007-07005 - 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560j 1570,
1580,1590,1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth - Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD\Maps\Existing Surrounding Uses.d<ltem # 17
View looking southeast at the subject property from SR 590
View looking west at the property south of the subject property
View looking north of subject property across SR 590
Attachment number 2
View looking west at the subject property from McMullen Booth
Road
View looking east from subject property across McMullen
Booth Road
View looking south at property west of subject property
LUZ2007-07005
Goral Tov ADA Compliant, L TD
1500,1510,1520,1530,1540,1550,1560,1570,1580,
1590,1600,1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth Road
Item # 17
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 3
ORDI NANCE NO. 7920-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE
CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF
STATE ROAD 590 AND MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD,
CONSISTING OF LOT 1, SOUTH OAKS FASHION
SQUARE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1500,
1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560, 1570, 1580, 1590,
1600, 1610, AND 1620 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, FROM
INDUSTRIAL LIMITED (IL) TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL
(CG); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the
City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter
described property as follows:
Property
Land Use Cateqorv
See attached legal description
From: Industrial Limited (IL)
(LUZ2007 -07005)
To: Commercial General (CG)
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent
with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject
to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County
Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate,
of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to
S 163.3189, Florida Statutes. The Community Development Coordinator is authorized
to transmit to the Pinellas County Planning Council an application to amend the
Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan
Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended by this ordinance.
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 7920-08
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Approved as to form:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Attachment number 3
Page 2 of 3
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Attest: :
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 7920-08
Attachment number 3
Page 3 of 3
Lot 1, South Oaks Fashion Square, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat
Book 101, Pages 57 and 58, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Item # 17
3
Ordinance No. 7920-08
Attachment number 4
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7921-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING
CERTAIN PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 590 AND MCMULLEN
BOOTH ROAD, CONSISTING OF LOT 1, SOUTH OAKS
FASHION SQUARE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560, 1570, 1580, 1590,
1600, 1610, AND 1620 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD, FROM
INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY (IRT) TO
COMMERCIAL (C); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this ordinance is
found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA:
Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is hereby rezoned, and
the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows:
Property
ZoninQ District
See attached legal description
(LUZ2007 -07005)
From: Industrial, Research and
Technology (IRT)
To: Commercial (C)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the
approval of the land use designation set forth in Ordinance 7920-08 by the Pinellas County Board
of County Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate,
of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to s163.3189, Florida Statutes.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 7921-08
Attachment number 4
Page 2 of 2
Lot 1, South Oaks Fashion Square, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in
Plat Book 101, Pages 57 and 58, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 7921-08
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve amendments to the Community Development Code to adopt alternative densities and intensities for overnight
accommodations, to improve the criteria by which overnight accommodations are permitted, to adopt criteria for indoor
recreation/entertainment uses where none previously existed, to further the consistency between the Community Development Code and
the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and to make other minor editorial changes, and Pass Ordinance 7926-08 on first reading.
SUMMARY:
The Planning Department is recommending several amendments to the Community Development Code (CDC) that are associated with
a companion amendment being proposed to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan that would adopt alternative density and intensity
standards for overnight accommodations consistent with the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use
Plan (AKA Countywide Plan Rules). As such, several of the proposed amendments are being brought about to ensure consistency
between the CDC and the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. In addition, however, are a few amendments that are editorial in nature or
are refinements to existing CDC sections.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
Amends the maximum development potential tables associated with the Commercial (C), Tourist (T) and Industrial, Research and
Technology (IRT) Districts so that they are compatible with the alternative density and intensity standards for overnight
accommodations proposed in Ordinance 7924-08.
Overnight Accommodation Flexibility Criteria.
Revises flexibility criteria for the overnight accommodation use in the Commercial (C), Tourist (T) and Industrial, Research and
Technology (IRT) Districts.
Definitions for Overnight Accommodations and Overnight Accommodation Unit.
Establishes a definition for the term "overnight accommodation unit" and a revised definition for the term "overnight accommodation,"
so as to be consistent with those definitions set forth in the Countywide Plan Rules.
Indoor Recreation/Entertainment.
Adds flexibility criteria for lot area, lot width, setbacks, height and off-street parking for the use in the Commercial (C) District where
none previously existed, but deviations were permissible.
Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District.
Removes the overnight accommodations use from the OSR District due to incompatibilities with the District and corrects an
inconsistency with the Countywide Plan Rules.
The staff report provided and Ordinance 7926-08 contain further analysis and information on the proposed amendments.
The Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed and approved the proposed text amendments at its public hearing of March 18,
2008. It is noted that at the Council meeting of March 20, 2008, the proposed text amendments were continued to the meeting of
April 17, 2008, in conjunction with associated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (CPA2008-01001) and the amendments to
Beach by Design so that staff could work with the Pinellas Planning Council to address their concerns.
Cover Memo
Review Approval: 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Item # 18
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 14
ORDI NANCE NO. 7926-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, MAKING
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO
ADOPT ALTERNATIVE DENSITIES AND INTENSITIES FOR
OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS, TO IMPROVE THE CRITERIA BY
WHICH OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS ARE PERMITTED, TO
ADOPT CRITERIA FOR INDOOR RECREATION/ENTERTAINMENT
USES WHERE NONE PREVIOUSLY EXISTED, TO FURTHER THE
CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND TO MAKE OTHER MINOR
EDITORIAL CHANGES BY AMENDING SECTION 2-701.1, "MAXIMUM
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL", TO MODIFY THE ACCOMPANYING
TABLE; AMENDING SECTION 2-703, "FLEXIBLE STANDARD
DEVELOPMENT', SUBSECTION 2-703.G, "INDOOR
RECREATION/ENTERTAINMENT', TO MODIFY THE FLEXIBILITY
CRITERIA FOR SAME; AMENDING SECTION 2-703, "FLEXIBLE
STANDARD DEVELOPMENT', SUBSECTION 2-703.M, "OVERNIGHT
ACCOMMODATIONS", TO MODIFY THE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR
SAME; AMENDING SECTION 2-704, "FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT',
SUBSECTION 2-704.K, "OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS", TO
MODIFY THE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SAME; AMENDING
SECTION 2-704, "FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT', BY ENACTING A NEW
SUBSECTION 2-704.D, "INDOOR RECREATION/ENTERTAINMENT',
AND ESTABLISHING FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SAME; AMENDING
SECTION 2-801.1, "MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL", TO
MODIFY THE ACCOMPANYING TABLE; AMENDING SECTION 2-802,
"FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT', SUBSECTION 2-802.J,
"OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS", TO MODIFY THE FLEXIBILITY
CRITERIA FOR SAME; AMENDING SECTION 2-803, "FLEXIBLE
DEVELOPMENT', SUBSECTION 2-803.1, "OVERNIGHT
ACCOMMODATIONS", TO MODIFY THE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR
SAME; AMENDING SECTION 2-1301.1, "MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL", TO MODIFY THE ACCOMPANYING TABLE; AMENDING
SECTION 2-1304, "FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT', "TABLE 2-1304", TO
ELIMINATE LANGUAGE IN FOOTNOTE (3) PERTAINING TO THE
INDUSTRIAL GENERAL LAND USE PLAN MAP CATEGORY, AND
MAKING MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES; AMENDING SECTION 2-1304,
"FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT', SUBSECTION 2-1304.E, "OVERNIGHT
ACCOMMODATIONS", TO MODIFY THE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR
SAME; AMENDING SECTION 2-1403, "FLEXIBLE STANDARD
DEVELOPMENT', "TABLE 2-1403", TO REMOVE THE OVERNIGHT
ACCOMMODATIONS USE; AMENDING SECTION 2-1403, "FLEXIBLE
STANDARD DEVELOPMENT', TO DELETE SUBSECTION 2-1403.C,
"OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS", IN ITS ENTIRETY; AMENDING
SECTION 2-1404, "FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT', "TABLE 2-1404", TO
MAKE MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES; AMENDING SECTION 8-102,
"DEFINITIONS", BY MODIFYING THE DEFINITION FOR OVERNIGHT
ACCOMMODATIONS, AND ADDING A DEFINITION FOR OVERNIGHT
ACCOMMODATION UNIT; CERTIFYING CONSISTENCY WITH THE
CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROPER ADVERTISEMENT;
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 14
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater adopted a new Community Development Code on
January 21, 1999 which was effective on March 8, 1999, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Community Development Code for consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, have
adopted, by amending the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land
Use Plan," alternative density and intensity standards for overnight accommodations via
Pinellas County Ordinance No. 07-50, and
WHEREAS, tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such
the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic
sector, and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has determined where the Community Development
Code needs clarification and revision, now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORI DA:
Section 1. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 7, "Commercial District ("C")",
Section 2-701.1, "Maximum development potential", of the Community Development Code, be,
and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 2-701.1. Maximum development potential.
The Commercial District ("C") may be located in more than one land use category. It is
the intent of the C District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use
Plan as required by State law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the C District
shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the
Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. Development potential for the
Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the C District are as follows:
Countywide Future Land Maximum Maximum Floor Area Ratio/Impervious Surjace Ratio Maximum Overnight
Use Designation Dwelling Units Overnizht Overnizht Non-Residential Accommodation Units
per Acre of Accommodations Accommodations Uses Per Acre
Land ~ (Alternative) Hase Alternative
Commercial Neighborhood lO dwelling N/A N/A FAR AO/ISR .80 N/A N/A
units per acre
Commercial Limited l8 dwelling FAR A5/ISR .85 FAR 1.0/ISR .85 FAR A5/ISR .85 30 units per 45
units per acre -
Commercial General 24 dwelling FAR .55/ISR .90 FAR l.2/ISR .90 FAR .55/ISR 40 units per 60
units per acre .9~0 -
Residential/Office/Relail l8 dwelling FAR AO/ISR .85 FAR 1.0/ISR .85 FAR AO/ISR .85 30 units per 45
units per acre aGf@
- 2 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 14
Resort Facilities High 30 dwelling FAR 1.0/ISR .95 FAR 2.0/ISR .95 FAR 1.0/ISR .95 50 units per Less than
units per acre aGf@ one acre: 75
FAR 3.0/ISR .95 Between
one acre
and three
acres: 100
FAR 4.0/ISR .95 Greater than
three acres:
l25
Section 2. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 7, "Commercial District ("C")",
Section 2-703.G, "Indoor recreation/entertainment", of the Community Development Code, be,
and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
G. Indoor recreation/entertainment.
1. Off-street parking: The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise
required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generating purposes.,.; and
2. Lot area and/or lot width: The reduction shall not result in a buildinQ which is out of scale
with existinQ buildinQs in the immediate vicinity.
Section 3. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 7, "Commercial District ("C")",
Section 2-703.M, "Overnight accommodations", of the Community Development, be, and the
same is hereby amended to read as follows:
M. Overnight accommodations.
1. Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall in lot area and width \II/ill not result in a
- -
building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development;
2. Location: The parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible;
3. Height:
a. The increased height shall results in an improved site plan throuQh landscape
areas in excess of the minimum required dimensions, and landscape materials in
excess of the minimum required quantities, landscaping areas in excess of the
minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; and
b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any
adjacent residential property.
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more
than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign
program.
5. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
b. The reduction in side or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking or improved design and appearance;
- 3 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 4 of 14
c. The reduction in side or rear setback does not reduce the amount of landscaped
area otherwise required.
a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any buildinQ by
emerQency vehicles and/or personnel;
b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan throuQh the provision of a
more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
beinQ diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas
throuQh a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
6. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area,
have a hurricane evacuation plan requirinQ the use close when a hurricane watch is
posted; and
7. A Development AQreement must be approved by the City Council pursuant to Florida
Statutes 163.3221 - 163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the
development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the
underlyinQ Future Land Use desiQnation. The Development AQreement shall:
a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules ConcerninQ the
Administration of the CountyWide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to
alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time;
b. Be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to Section 163.3239,
F.S, with a copy filed with the Property Appraiser's Office, and a copy submitted
to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filinQ within fourteen (14) days after
recordinQ; and
c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall
be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of
any buildinQ permit for the overniQht accommodations use.
Section 4. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 7, "Commercial District ("C")",
Section 2-704.K, "Overnight accommodations", of the Community Development Code, be, and
the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
K. Overnight accommodations.
1. Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall in lot area and 'A'idth 'A'ill not result in a
- -
building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity Gf..-..ti:le
parcel proposed for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development 'Nill not involve direct access
to a major arterial street The parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not
involve direct access to a maior arterial street unless no other means of access would be
possible;
3. Height:
a. The increased height shall results in an improved site plan throuQh landscape
areas in excess of the minimum required dimensions, and landscape materials in
excess of the minimum required quantities, landscaping areas in excess of the
minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; and
b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any
adjacent residential property.
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more
than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
- 4 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 5 of 14
development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign
program;
5. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking or improved design and appearance.
a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any buildinQ by
emerQency vehicles and/or personnel;
b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan throuQh the provision of a
more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
beinQ diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas
throuQh a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
6. Front setback: The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
a. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan throuQh the provision of
a more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance; and
b. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
beinQ diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas
throuQh a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
7. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area,
have a hurricane evacuation plan requirinQ the use close when a hurricane watch is
posted; and
8. A Development AQreement must be approved by the City Council pursuant to Florida
Statutes 163.3221 - 163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the
development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the
underlyinQ Future Land Use desiQnation. The Development AQreement shall:
a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules ConcerninQ the
Administration of the CountyWide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to
alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time;
b. Be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to Section 163.3239,
F.S, with a copy filed with the Property Appraiser's Office, and a copy submitted
to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filinQ within fourteen (14) days after
recordinQ; and
c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall
be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of
any buildinQ permit for the overniQht accommodations use.
Section 5. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 7, "Commercial District ("C")",
Section 2-704, "Flexible development", of the Community Development Code, be, and the same
is hereby amended to add a new subsection D, "Indoor recreation/entertainment", and re-
lettering the subsequent subsections as appropriate:
D. Indoor recreation/entertainment.
1. Lot area and/or lot width: The reduction shall not result in a buildinQ that is out of scale
with existinQ buildinQs in the immediate vicinity;
- 5 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 6 of 14
2. Heiqht: The increased heiQht shall result in an improved site plan throuQh landscape
areas in excess of the minimum required dimensions, and landscape materials in excess
of the minimum required quantities;
3. Front setback: The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan throuQh the
provision of a more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance;
4. Side and rear setbacks:
a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any buildinQ by
emerQency vehicles and/or personnel;
b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan throuQh the provision of a
more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance; and
5. Off-street parkinq: The physical characteristics of a proposed buildinQ are such that the
likely uses of the property will require fewer parkinQ spaces per floor area than otherwise
required or that the use of siQnificant portions of the buildinQ will be used for storaQe or
other non-parkinQ demand-QeneratinQ purposes.
Section 6. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 8, "Tourist District ("1")", Section
2-801.1, "Maximum development potential", of the Community Development Code, be, and the
same is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 2-801.1. Maximum development potential.
The Tourist District ("T") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the
intent of the T District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use
Plan as required by state law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the T District
shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the
Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. For those parcels within the T District
that have an area within the boundaries of and governed by a special area plan approved by the
City Commission Council and the Countywide Planning Authority, maximum development
potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved plan.
Development potential for the Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the T
District are as follows:
12=:::~-1 ~~: I =""if:~:;:: . I :=E:"madaIi8H>
Use DCSlgn~tlon per Acre of Land Ratio/Impervzous SwftlCe RatIo [}mts Per ~1cre
Resort Facilities High 30 dwelling units per acre F/\R l.OIISR .95 50 units per acre
Countywide Future Land Maximum Maximum Floor Area Ratio / Impervious Surface Ratio Maximum Ovemizht
Use Desiznation Dwellinz Units Ovemizht Ovemizht Non-Residential Accommodations Units
per Acre of Accommodations Accommodations Uses Per Acre *
Land ~ (Altemative) Hase Altemative
Resort Facilities High 30 dwelling FAR 1.0lISR .95 FAR2.0IISR .95 FAR 1.0lISR .95 50 Less than
units per acre one acre: 75
FAR 3.01ISR .95 Between
one acre
and three
acres: 100
FAR 4.01ISR .95 Greater than
three acres:
l25
- 6 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 7 of 14
* Or as set forth in Beach bv Desizn: A Preliminary Desizn for Clearwater Beach and Desizn Guidelines. the svecial area vlan
zoveminz Clearwater Beach adovted bv Ord. No. 6689-01 and as amended.
Section 7. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 8, "Tourist District ("1")", Section
2-802.J, "Overnight accommodations", of the Community Development Code, be, and the same
is hereby amended to read as follows:
J. Overnight accommodations.
1. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access
to a major arterial street With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater
Beach, the parcel proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct
access to a maior arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible;
2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design
and appearance;
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more
than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign
program;
4. Front setback:
a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life;
b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan throuQh the provision of
a more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
beinQ diminished by the setback reduction will be accommodated for in other
areas throuQh a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
45. Setbac/{s Side and rear setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street
HfeT
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear setbacks does not prevent access to the rear of
any building by emergency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear setbacks results in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking or improved design and appearance;
e. The reduction in side and rear setbacks does not reduce the amount of
landscaped area otherwise required.
a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any buildinQ by
emerQency vehicles and/or personnel;
b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan throuQh the provision of a
more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
beinQ diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas
throuQh a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
56. The design of all buildings shall comply complies with the Tourist District site and
architectural design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable; Division 5 of ^rticle 3.
- 7 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 8 of 14
e7. Lot width: The reduced reduction in lot width shall wiU not result in a building which is out
of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity; and of the parcel proposed for
development.
8. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area,
have a hurricane evacuation plan requirinQ the use close when a hurricane watch is
posted; and
9. A Development AQreement must be approved by the City Council pursuant to Florida
Statutes 163.3221 - 163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the
development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the
underlyinQ Future Land Use desiQnation. The Development AQreement shall:
a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules ConcerninQ the
Administration of the CountyWide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to
alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time;
b. Be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to Section 163.3239,
F.S, with a copy filed with the Property Appraiser's Office, and a copy submitted
to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filinQ within fourteen (14) days after
recordinQ; and
c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall
be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of
any buildinQ permit for the overniQht accommodations use.
Section 8. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 8, "Tourist District ("1")", Section
2-803.1, "Overnight accommodations", of the Community Development Code, be, and the same
is hereby amended to read as follows:
I. Overnight accommodations.
1. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development 'Nill not involve direct access
to an arterial street With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach,
the parcel proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to
a maior arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible;
2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design
and appearance;
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more
than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign
program;
4. Front setback:
a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life;
b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan throuQh the provision of
a more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
beinQ diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas
throuQh a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
45. Setbac/{s Side and rear setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street
HfeT
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance;
- 8 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
a6.
e7.
8.
9.
Attachment number 1
Page 9 of 14
c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking or improved design and appearance;
a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any buildinQ by
emerQency vehicles and/or personnel;
b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan throuQh the provision of a
more efficient off-street parkinQ area, and/or improved buildinQ desiQn and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
beinQ diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas
throuQh a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
The design of all buildings shall comply complies with the Tourist District site and
architectural design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable; Division 5 of Article 3.
Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall in lot area and width \II/ill not result in a
- -
building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity Gf..-..ti:le
parcel proposed for development;
The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area,
have a hurricane evacuation plan requirinQ the use close when a hurricane watch is
posted; and
A Development AQreement must be approved by the City Council pursuant to Florida
Statutes 163.3221 - 163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the
development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the
underlyinQ Future Land Use desiQnation. The Development AQreement shall:
a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules ConcerninQ the
Administration of the CountyWide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to
alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time;
b. Be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to Section 163.3239,
F.S, with a copy filed with the Property Appraiser's Office, and a copy submitted
to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filinQ within fourteen (14) days after
recordinQ; and
c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall
be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of
any buildinQ permit for the overniQht accommodations use.
Section 9. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 13, "Industrial, Research and
Technology District ("IRT")", Section 2-1301.1, "Maximum development potential", of the
Community Development Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 2-1301.1. Maximum development potential.
The Industrial, Research and Technology District ("IRT") may be located in more than
one land use category. It is the intent of the IRT District that development be consistent with the
Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The development potential of a
parcel of land within the IRT District shall be determined by the standards found in this
Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property.
Development potential for the Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the I RT
District are as follows:
I Countvwide
Maximum Floor Area Ratio/Impervious Surjace Ratio Maximum Ovemi'Zht
I Maximum
- 9 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 10 of 14
Future Land Dwelling Units Ovemizht Ovemizht Non-Residential Accommodation Units ver
Use Designation per Acre of Accommodations Accommodations Uses Acre
Land ~ (Altemative) Hase Altemative
Industrial Limited N/A FAR .65/ISR .85 FAR l.5/ISR .85 FAR .65/ISR .85 50 r subiect to 75 r subiect to
master master
development development
plan plan
requirements in requirements in
Section Section
2.3.3.6.l of the 2.3.3.6.l of the
Countywide Countywide
Plan Rules 1 Plan Rules 1
Industrial General N/A N/A N/A FAR .75/ISR .95 N/A N/A
Section 10. That Article 2, "Zoning District", Division 13, "Industrial, Research and
Technology District ("IRT"), Section 2-1304, "Table 2-1304", of the Community Development
Code, be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
Table 2-1304. HIRTH District Flexible Development Standards
Min. Lot Min. Lot Min. Setbacks (ft.)
Uses Area Width (ft.) Max. Height (ft.) Min. Off Street Parking
(sq. ft.) Front * Side ::wieJRear
Adult Uses (l ) 10,000 100 20 l5 l5 30 5/1,000 SF GFA
Determined by the
Comprehensive Infill community development
Redevelopment n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a director based on the
Project specific use and/or ITE
Manual standards
Nightclubs (2) 10,000 100 20 l5 l5 30 l5/1,000 SF GFA
Offices 10,000 100 20 12 l5 30 3/1,000 SF GFA
Overnight 40,000 200 20 12 l5 50 l/UNIT
Accommodations (3)
Salvage Yards 40,000 200 20 12 l5 30 l/200 SF of office space
Self Storage 20,000 100 20 l5 l5 30 1 per 20--25 units plus 2
for manager's office
SocialIPublic Service 10,000 100 20 12 l5 30 3/1,000 SF GFA
Agencies (4)
Telecommunication 10,000 50 25a 10 -l-W20 Refer to Section n/a
Towers 3-200l
* The front setback may be reduced to l5 feet for parking lots provided the land area is not sufficient to accommodate the full
setback requirement and the reduction results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance and landscaping is in
excess ofthe minimum required.
(l) Adult uses shall not exceed five acres in area in the Industrial Limited land use plan map category or exceed 25 percent of a
project in the Industrial General land use plan map category.
(2) Nightclubs shall not exceed five acres in area in the Industrial Limited land use plan map category or exceed 25 percent of a
project in the Industrial General land use plan map category.
(3) Overnight accommodations shall not exceed five acres in the Industrial Limited land use plan map category or €xc€€d 25
p€rc€I1t of a proj€ct af€a in th€ Industrial Gen€falland us€ plan map cat€gory.
(4) Social/public service agencies shall not exceed five acres.
- 10 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 11 of 14
Section 11. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 13, "Industrial, Research and
Technology District ("IRT")", Section 2-1304.E, "Overnight accommodations", of the Community
Development Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
E. Overnight accommodations.
1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land with a
residential desiQnation which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas;
2. The parcel proposed for development abuts an arterial street;
3. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an
arterial street.
2. The parcel proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to
a maior arterial street;
3. Siqns: No siQn of any kind is desiQned or located so that any portion of the siQn is more
than six feet above the finished Qrade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such siQnaQe is a part of an approved comprehensive siQn
proQram;
4. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area,
have a hurricane evacuation plan requirinQ the use close when a hurricane watch is
posted; and
5. A Development AQreement must be approved by the City Council pursuant to Florida
Statutes 163.3221 - 163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the
development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the
underlyinQ Future Land Use desiQnation. The Development AQreement shall:
a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules ConcerninQ the
Administration of the CountyWide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to
alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time;
b. Be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to Section 163.3239,
F.S, with a copy filed with the Property Appraiser's Office, and a copy submitted
to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filinQ within fourteen (14) days after
recordinQ; and
c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall
be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of
any buildinQ permit for the overniQht accommodations use.
Section 12. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 14, "Open Space/Recreation
District ("OSR")", Section 2-1403, "Table 2-1403", of the Community Development Code, be,
and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
Table 2-1403. "OSR" District Flexible Standard Development Standards
Min. Lot Min. Lot Max. Height Min. OfFStreet
Use Size (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Min. Setbacks (ft.) (ft.) Parking
Front Side Rear
Governmental Use N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
~ 2.5--5 per
10,000 SF land
Outdoor 2.5 acres 200 25 20 25 30 area or as
RecreationlEntertainment determined by
the community
develonment
- 11 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 12 of 14
coordinator
based on lIE
Manual
standards
OV€I1light /\ccommodations WIA Bfa ~ ;W ~ W s€€ Standards
Parking Garages and Lots 20,000 100 25 10 20 50 N/A
Public Transportation Facilities N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 N/A
Restaurants 40,000 200 25 20 25 30 10 per l,OOO SF
GFA
Retail Sales and Service 40,000 200 25 20 25 30 4 per l,OOO SF
GFA
Utility /Infrastructure F acili ties N/A N/A 25 10 20 N/A N/A
Section 13. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 14, "Open Space/Recreation
District ("OSR")", Section 2-1403, "Flexible standard development", of the Community
Development Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to delete subsection C, "Overnight
accommodations", and re-Iettering the subsequent subsections as appropriate:
C. O'lernjght accommodatjons.
1. The use is accessory to private clubs;
2. No more than one unit per golf course hole or one unit per t\~/O marina slips, one per
tennis court or four per s'Nimming pool, but in no case more than 18 units on a single
parcel proposed for development;
3. The use is limited to use by members of the club or their guests;
Section 14. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 14, "Open Space/Recreation
District ("OSR")", Section 2-1404, "Table 2-1404", of the Community Development Code, be,
and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
Table 2-1404. "OSR" District Flexible Standard Development Standards
Min. Lot :iize Min. Lot Max. Height Min. OjF:itreet
Use (sq. jt.) Width (ft.) Min. :ietbacks (ft.) (ft.) Parking
Front Side Rear
Determined by
the community
development
Comprehensive lnfill coordinator
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A based on the
Redevelopment Project specific use
and/or ITE
Manual
standards
Section 15. That Article 8, "Definitions and Rules of Construction", Section 8-102,
"Definitions", of the Community Development Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to
read as follows:
**********
- 12 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Attachment number 1
Page 13 of 14
Overniqht Accommodation Unit means an individual room, rooms or suite within an
overniQht accommodations use desiQned to be occupied, occupied, or held out to be occupied
as a sinQle unit for temporary occupancy.
**********
Overnight Accommodations means any use that provides transient lodging
accommodations to the public, a membership group, or members of an association, including
interval o'Nnership. ^"o'Nable accessory uses shall be integral to the principal use and may
include, but shall not be limited to, offices, restaurants and retail provided such uses are integral
to the primary use a facility containinQ one or more overniQht accommodation units, the
occupancy of which occurs, or is offered or advertised as beinQ available, for a term of less than
31 days or one calendar month, whichever is less. In determininQ whether a property is used as
an overniQht accommodation use, such determination shall be made without reQard to the form
of ownership of the property or unit, or whether the occupant has a direct or indirect interest in
the property or unit; and without reQard to whether the riQht of occupancy arises from a rental
aQreement, other aQreement, or the payment of consideration.
**********
Section 16. Amendments to the Community Development Code of the City of
Clearwater (as originally adopted by Ordinance No. 6348-99 and subsequently amended) are
hereby adopted to read as set forth in this Ordinance.
Section 17. The City of Clearwater does hereby certify that the amendments
contained herein, as well as the provisions of this Ordinance, are consistent with and in
conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 18. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 19. Notice of the proposed enactment of this Ordinance has been properly
advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with applicable law.
Section 20. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Approved as to form:
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Attest:
Leslie Dougall-Sides
Cynthia E. Goudeau
- 13 -
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
Assistant City Attorney
- 14 -
Attachment number 1
Page 14 of 14
City Clerk
OrdiHama 1#01 ~26-08
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Ordinance No.:
Agenda Item:
REQUEST:
INITIA TED BY:
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 4
March 18, 2008
TA2008-01001
7926-08
H. 3.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Amendments to the Community Development Code to adopt alternative
densities and intensities for overnight accommodations, to improve the
criteria by which overnight accommodations are permitted, to adopt criteria
for indoor recreation/entertainment uses where none previously existed, to
further the consistency between the Community Development Code and the
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and to make other minor editorial changes.
City of Clearwater Planning Department
BACKGROUND:
The proposed amendments to the Community Development Code (CDC) are associated with an
amendment being proposed to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan that would adopt alternative density
and intensity standards for overnight accommodations consistent with the "Rules Concerning the
Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" (AKA Countywide Plan Rules). As such,
several of the proposed amendments are being brought about to ensure consistency between the CDC and
the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. In addition, however, are a few amendments that are editorial in
nature or are refinements to existing CDC sections.
ANAL YSIS:
The following is a summary of the proposed amendments organized by CDC Article. The proposed
Ordinance No. 7926-08 is also attached and includes each of the amendments. Within the ordinance
document, text that is underlined indicates proposed language and text containing strikcthroughs indicate
deletions.
Article 2. Zonin2: Districts
o Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan (Pages 2, 3, 6, 7 and 9 of Ordinance)
This ordinance adds the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category to the list of
Countywide Future Land Use Plan Designations compatible with the High Density Residential
(HDR) and Commercial (C) Districts. The Clearwater Comprehensive Plan already identifies these
compatibilities.
This ordinance also amends the maximum development potential tables associated with the
Commercial (C), Tourist (T) and Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) Districts so that they are
compatible with the adopted alternative density and intensity standards for overnight accommodations
(proposed with Ordinance No. 7924-08). The C District would allow an alternative density of 45
units per acre (compared to a base of 30) where there is an underlying Future Land Use Plan
designation of either Commercial Limited (CL) or Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R); and of 60 units
per acre (compared to a base of 40) where Commercial General (CG) FLUP designations exist. The
Community Development Board - March 18, 2008
T A2008-0 100 1 - Page 1
Item # 18
Attachment number 2
Page 2 of 4
C District, as well as the T District, would also allow, as an alternative to the base density of 50 units
per acre, between 75 and 125 units per acre (depending upon property size) where it coincides with a
FLUP designation of Resort Facilities High (RFH). With regard to the IRT District, an alternative
density of 75 units per acre (compared to a base of 50) would be possible, but would still be subject to
the master development plan requirements of the Countywide Plan Rules.
o Indoor Recreation/Entertainment (Pages 3, 5 and 6 of Ordinance)
This ordinance adds a flexibility criterion addressing lot area and/or width to the Flexible Standard
Development (FLS) indoor recreation/entertainment use within the Commercial (C) District as none
presently exists for the permissible lot area and lot width deviations.
This ordinance also adds flexibility criteria addressing lot area and/or width, height, setbacks and
parking to the Flexible Development (FLD) indoor recreation/entertainment use within the
Commercial (C) District as no criteria presently exist for this use.
o Overnight Accommodation Flexibility Criteria (Pages 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of Ordinance)
This ordinance adopts revised and consistent flexibility criteria for the overnight accommodation use
in the Commercial (C), Tourist (T) and Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) Districts. For the
most part, the revisions only restate criteria for clarity or to improve upon the original intent; however
two new criteria are being added. One criterion requires that if a development proposes to make use
of adopted alternative density/intensity standards, then they would need to enter into a development
agreement with the City. The other criterion requires that overnight accommodations located within a
Coastal Storm Area would need to have a hurricane evacuation plan.
o Open Space/Recreation District (Pages 11 and 12 of Ordinance)
This ordinance removes the Flexible Standard Development (FLS) overnight accommodation use
from the Open Space/Recreation (OSR) District. This use is being removed for a couple of reasons.
First, the Future Land Use category that is compatible with the OSR District does not allow overnight
accommodation density. Second, the use is only to be as an accessory use to private clubs; however
private clubs are not permitted in the OSR District. As such, the overnight accommodation use needs
to be removed.
There is also a minor correction being done with this ordinance to Table 2-1404 of the Open
Space/Recreation (OSR) District to remove the erroneous word "Standard" from the title.
Article 8. Definitions and Rules of Construction
o Overnight Accommodations & Overnight Accommodation Unit (Pages 12 and 13 of Ordinance)
This ordinance adopts a definition for the term "overnight accommodation unit" and a revised
definition for the term "overnight accommodation". The adoption of these definitions is so that the
City is consistent with those definitions set forth in the Countywide Plan Rules.
CRITERIA FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS:
Community Development Code Section 4-601 sets forth the procedures and criteria for reviewing text
amendments. All text amendments must comply with the following:
Community Development Board - March 18, 2008
T A2008-0 100 1 - Page 2
Item # 18
Attachment number 2
Page 3 of 4
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Below is a selected list of goals, objectives and policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan that
are furthered by the proposed amendments to the Community Development Code:
Goal 2
Objective 3.2
Policies 3.2.1
The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and
engineering practices, and urban design standards in order to protect historic
resources, ensure neighborhood preservation, redevelop blighted areas, and
encourage infill development.
Future Land Use in the City of Clearwater shall be guided by the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan Map and implemented through the City's Community Development
Code. Map categories are further defined in Policy # 3.2.1 below.
Land Uses on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map shall generally be
interpreted as indicated in the following table. The intensity standards listed in the
table (FAR - floor area ratio; ISR - impervious surface ratio) are the maximum
allowed for each plan category, except where otherwise permitted by special area
plans or redevelopment plans approved by the City Commission. Consequently,
individual zoning districts, as established by the City's Community Development
Code, may have more stringent intensity standards than those listed in the table but
will not exceed the maximum allowable intensity of the plan category, unless
otherwise permitted by approved special area plans or redevelopment plans.
In addition to the above, the following objective and policies are proposed with the companion
Ordinance No. 7924-08, which amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. These would also be
furthered by the proposed amendments to the Community Development Code.
Objective 2.6
Policy 2.6.1
Policy 2.6.2
Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City
shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important
economic sector.
The City supports and encourages the continued development and redevelopment
of overnight accommodation uses.
The City supports the adoption of higher density/intensity standards for overnight
accommodation uses such that a sufficient supply shall be available within the
City provided that concurrency standards are met.
2. The proposed amendment furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City
ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan.
The proposed text amendment will further the purposes of the Community Development Code in that
it will be consistent with the following purposes set forth in CDC Section 1-103:
o Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative
redevelopment (CDC Section 1-103.B.1).
o Strengthening the City's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole (CDC Section 1-
103.B.3).
Community Development Board - March 18, 2008
T A2008-0 100 1 - Page 3
Item # 18
Attachment number 2
Page 4 of 4
o Protect the character and the social and economic stability of all parts of the City through the
establishment of reasonable standards which encourage the orderly and beneficial development of
land within the City (CDC Section 1-103.E.2).
o Establish permitted uses corresponding with the purpose and character of the respective zoning
districts and limit uses within each district to those uses specifically authorized (CDC Section 1-
1 03.E. 9).
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDA nON:
The proposed amendments to the Community Development Code are consistent with and further the
goals of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the Community Development Code.
The amendments further those development goals established in the Code, and existing Community
Development Code provisions are amended to better reflect City development patterns and improve
internal processes. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of
Ordinance No. 7926-08 that amends the Community Development Code.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
ATTACHMENT:
o Ordinance No. 7926-08
S:\Planning DepartmentlCommunity Development Codel2008 CodeAmendmentslTA2008-0iOOilOrdinance No 7926-08 CDB StajfReport 2008
03-i8.doc
Community Development Board - March 18, 2008
T A2008-0 100 1 - Page 4
Item # 18
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve amendments to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines that establish the Hotel
Density Reserve and associated criteria for allocation, and Pass Ordinance 7925-08 on first reading.
SUMMARY:
The Planning Department is recommending amendments to Beach by Design that would establish a Hotel Density Reserve containing
1,385 hotel rooms for allocation on a project-by-project basis to enable hotel development to achieve economic parity and to provide for
the development of new mid-size, mid-priced hotels.
The need for and the size of the Hotel Density Reserve was reached following the completion of an economic study that identified
hotels as having an economic disparity with condominium development, and the completion of a traffic study that concluded only a
maximum across-the-board density of 90 hotel rooms per acre could be achieved on Clearwater Beach.
With regard to the economic study, which was conducted in October 2006, it was determined that condominium development could
support on average a land value that is seven times higher per unit than hotel development. Accordingly, hotels would need roughly 5 to
7 rooms for every condominium unit in order to compete with potential condominium development in terms of economic viability. The
traffic study that was subsequently undertaken in order to determine the maximum density that could be achieved within the established
Level of Service (LOS) standards for the transportation network, determined that Clearwater Beach could support an additional 1,385
hotel rooms or an across-the-board density of 90 hotel rooms per acre. As economic parity would not be achieved with an across-the-
board density, Beach by Design would capture the development potential that could exist between 50 and 90 hotel rooms per acre
within the Hotel Density Reserve for allocation on a project-by-project basis.
It is also noted that the existing capacity and demand for both potable water and wastewater was examined and no capacity issues are
anticipated with either. The City's average consumption of potable water is 13 MGD (million gallons per day), and the City has
facilities that can produce 4 MGD with the balance of the potable water service being provided from Tampa Bay Water via
interconnects with Pinellas County, and there is no cap on the agreement for purchased water. The recent peak historic flow (past five
years) for wastewater is 20.04 MGD and the City has a wastewater capacity of approximately 28.5 MGD. It is further noted, however,
that some wastewater system improvements will be needed at some point, but the costs associated with those improvements would have
to be born by the private sector.
In addition, the amendment also establishes several criteria that must be incorporated and/or met in order for a project to draw units
from the Reserve. Some of those criteria are as follows:
. Those properties and/or developments that have acquired density from the Destination Resort Density Pool are not eligible to
have rooms allocated from the Reserve.
. Those properties and/or developments that have had density transferred off to another property and/or development(s) through an
approved Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application by the City after December 31, 2007, are not eligible to have
rooms allocated from the Reserve.
. A maximum of 100 hotel rooms may be allocated from the Reserve to any development with a lot size less than 2.5 acres. Those
developments with a lot size greater than or equal to 2.5 acres may use the Reserve to achieve a density of 90 hotel rooms per
acre. However, in no instance shall the density of a parcel of land exceed 175 units per acre regardless of whether it has received
benefit of transfers of development rights in addition to the Reserve, or not.
. Accessory uses inconsistent with amenities typical of a mid-priced hotel shall require compliance with the base FAR
requirements of the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category.
. The maximum building heights of the various character districts cannot be increased to accommodate hotel rooms allocated from
the Reserve.
. When both the allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve and the transfer of development rights (TDR) are utilized as part of a
development, only hotel rooms brought in to the project through the TDR process are eligible to be constructed above the
otherwise maximum building height, but only provided that all TDR criteria are met.
Cover Memo
The staff report and Ordinance 7925-08 contain all of the allocation criteria as well as further analysis and informatioIlmrtP~pt~osed
amendment.
The Community Development Board (CDB) recommended approval of the proposed amendments at its pubic hearing of March 18,
2008, with the condition that the requirement of a minimum lot size be eliminated. It is noted that at the Council meeting of March 20,
2008, the proposed amendments to Beach by Design were continued to the meeting of April 17 , 2008, in conjunction with associated
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (CPA2008-0l001) and the Community Development Code (TA2008-0l001) so that the staff
could work with the Pinellas Planning Council to address their concerns.
Review Approval: 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 19
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 2
ORDI NANCE NO. 7925-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING
AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN
FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES; BY
ESTABLISHING EDITORIAL CONSISTENCY WITH REGARD TO THE
NAME OF THE EXISTING 600-UNIT DENSITY POOL AS THE
"DESTINATION RESORT DENSITY POOL"; AMENDING SECTION V.
CATALYTIC PROJECTS; SUBSECTION B. COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION, ORGANIZING THE
EXISTING TEXT OF THIS SUBSECTION INTO A NEW SUBSECTION B.
1. ENTITLED "DESTINATION RESORT DENSITY POOL"; CREATING A
NEW SUBSECTION B. 2. ENTITLED "HOTEL DENSITY RESERVE,"
ESTABLISHING A HOTEL DENSITY RESERVE AND PROVIDING
CRITERIA FOR ALLOCATING THE RESERVE; AMENDING SECTION
VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES; SUBSECTION A. DENSITY, CLARIFYING
DENSITY LIMITS OF 50 UNITS PER ACRE MAY ONLY BE EXCEEDED
THROUGH THE DESTINATION RESORT DENSITY POOL OR HOTEL
DENSITY RESERVE; AND MAKING MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES;
PROVIDING THAT SAID PROVISIONS SUPPLEMENT THE
CLEARWATER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the economic vitality of Clearwater Beach is a major contributor to
the economic health of the City overall and the City desires to support the tourism
industry; and
WHEREAS, increases in overnight accommodation density do not result in
permanent populations increases; and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to achieve economic parity between
the overnight accommodation and the attached dwelling uses; and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to restore those mid-priced overnight
accommodation units that were lost to redevelopment on Clearwater Beach; and
WHEREAS, there is a maximum number of vehicular trips that can be
accommodated on the existing transportation network, and the City of Clearwater
desires to remain within the established Level of Service (LOS) standards for that
transportation network; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to Beach by Design have been
submitted to the Community Development Board acting as the Local Planning Authority
(LPA) for the City of Clearwater; and
Ordinance No. 7925-08
Item # 19
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 2
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for the City of Clearwater held a
duly noticed public hearing and found that amendments to Beach by Design are
consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, Beach by Design was originally adopted on February 15, 2001, and
subsequently amended, now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. Amendments 1 - 2 to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for
Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby
adopted.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of
Community Affairs (DCA) issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to
be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the
adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3184,
163.3187, or 163.3189, F.S., as amended.
Section 3. The City Manager or designee shall forward said plan to any
agency required by law or rule to review or approve same; and
Section 4. It is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance and plan
and every provision thereof, shall be considered severable; and the invalidity of any
section or provision of this ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other provision of
this ordinance and plan; and
Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank Hibbard
Mayor-Councilmember
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Ordinance No. 7925-08
Item # 19
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT A
ATTACHMENT TO ORDINANCE 7925-08
AMENDMENT 1 - BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR
CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES, SECTION V. CATALYTIC
PROJECTS
Amend Subsection B. Community Redevelopment District Designation starting from page 48
as follows:
* * * * *
DestinMion Resort Density Pool
The situation on Clearwater Beach is complicated by a number of additional factors. The
existing regulatory regime limits density on the Beach to 40 hotel units per acre. In order to
justify the cost of demolishing income producing improvements (no matter how modest), new
resort development would require a significant increase in density above 40 hotel units per acre.
Depending on the discount rate and the current economic performance of the existing product,
the gross cost of acquisition and demolition of existing units ranges from 2 to 4 times the per
room cost which a quality resort hotel developer could afford to pay. Finally, much of the
obsolescence of Clearwater Beach is attributable to the lack of resort facilities with a full range of
on-site amenities. Several of the better hotels on Sand Key and Clearwater Beach operate as
"destination resorts," however, even those resorts lack many of the amenities that are available at
better hotels in other markets with which Clearwater Beach competes.
* * * * *
In order to stimulate the desired catalytic resort projects, Beach by Design establishes a
limited pool DestinMion Resort Density Pool of 600 additional hotel rooms which would be
available for use at one or more sites within designated priority redevelopment areas for a period
of ten (10) years. This period would run from the date that the Community Redevelopment
District is approved by the County and accepted by the State. In the event that the units were not
allocated pursuant to Beach by Design within ten (10) years, the pool of units would cease to
exi st.
Although Beach by Design creates a pool of additional aestinMion resort hotel rooms
which are not currently authorized under the existing planning and regulatory regime, Beach by
Design foresees that the additional units will not in fact have any adverse impact on Clearwater
Beach, the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, the Tampa Bay Region or the State of Florida.
That is so because the way in which the units would be made available ensures that the nominal
externalities of additional barrier island development will be eliminated or mitigated. For
example, the reason d'etre of a destination resort is to have guests travel to the resort and spend
most of their time (and money) at the resort. This fact is reflected in the Institute of Traffic
Engineer's 6th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual which shows that destination resorts
generate somewhere between 50% and 12% of the number of trips generated by traditional
Ordinance 7925-08, Eltaml 'fA'19
Attachment number 2
Page 2 of 6
motels and hotels. Experience from around the State of Florida - from Sanibel to Miami to Boca
Raton to the Florida Keys -- demonstrates that guests at destination resorts generate a fraction of
the number of daily trips which are projected by the Institute of Traffic Engineers for the
occupants of an ordinary hotel room. Equally important, the availability of on-site amenities
means that when guests leave the resort, their trips are highly discretionary and unlikely to occur
during peak travel periods.
A critical concern under Florida law involves increased residential densities on the State's
barrier islands. Although the primary concern relates to hurricane evacuation, environmental
issues are also implicated in undeveloped areas. Historically, Florida planning and zoning has
treated hotel units as a type of residential dwelling, even though hotels are commercial operations
and hotel guests do not generate school children or regularly require social and health services.
As a result, an increase in hotel units on a barrier island, as a matter of law, constituted an
increase in residential intensities - directly, where hotel units are defined as a residential use, or
indirectly, as in the case of the Pinellas County Planning Rules and the City's land development
regulations where hotel and residential units are interchangeable subject only a density ratio. For
the purposes of the additional hotel units pool DestinMion Resort Density Pool, Beach by Design
provides that such units are not interchangeable with residential units and that hotel rooms will
be limited to tenancies of 30 days or less. In addition, Beach by Design provides that any hotel
room which is allocated from the additional hotel loom pool DestinMion Resort Density Pool
will be subject to a legally enforceable deed restriction that the hotel which contains an additional
hotel room will be closed as soon as practicable after the National Hurricane Center posts a
hurricane watch for an area which includes Clearwater Beach. As a result, no occupants of
destination resorts would remain to be evacuated when and if a hurricane warning is posted.
Recent experience reveals that most hotel reservations are cancelled when a hurricane watch is
posted and that most hotel operators close as soon as possible because of the cost of maintaining
staff and operations with only a few stalwart guests. In contrast, residents are likely to wait until
the last minute or until they are ordered to evacuate. For Clearwater Beach, resort hotel units are
an obvious advantage over residential units, that is, 0 persons required to evacuate from one acre
of land improved with a destination resort hotel when a hurricane warning is posted, as opposed
to 69 persons from one acre of land developed at current residential densities.
* * * * *
The allocation of units from the pool DestinMion Resort Density Pool to a particular
proj ect would be strictly controlled and would require that the proposed resort be of a character
that it will serve as a catalyst for the revitalization of Clearwater Beach. In order to be eligible
for additional resort hotel units, a project would have to have the following characteristics:
* * * * *
The allocation of additional hotel rooms from the pool DestinMion Resort Density Pool
would be made by approval by the City Commission. The land areas which are eligible for
additional hotel rooms from the additional hotel loom pool DestinMion Resort Density Pool are
highlighted on the adj acent aerial photograph.
- 2 -
Ordinance 7925-08, Eltaml 'fA'19
Attachment number 2
Page 3 of 6
* * * * *
2 Hotel Density Reserve (2007 TTpdMe)
Since 2002 f:le::lrwMer Re::lch h::ls suffered ::I loss of numerous mid-size~ mid-priced hotel
rooms to whM h::ld heen ::I thriving condominium m::lrket until 2006/07 The loss of these rooms
h::ls hecome ::I signific::lnt issue for hoth f:le::lrwMer Re::lch ::Ind the f:itY::ls ::I whole
A study prep::lred hy Dr Owen Reitsch in Octoher 2006 ::In::llyzed the m::lrket ::Ind noted
the existence of::l greM economic disp::lrity hetween hotels ::Ind condominiums The disp::lrity W::lS
so l::lrge during this time thM hotels required roughly five to seven rooms per condominium unit
just to compete with potenti::ll condominium development in terms of economic vi::lhility R::Ised
upon the existing density for condominiums of 10 units per ::Icre~ hotels would require ::I density
of hetween 150 ::Ind 210 rooms per ::Icre to he ::In economic::llly vi::lhle ::IltemMive to
condominiums The current regulMory stmcture permits 50 hotel rooms per ::Icre
The loss of hotel rooms ::Ind the fOffilMion of ::In economic disp::lrity hetween hotels ::Ind
condominiums were not limited to f:le::lrwMer Re::lch ::Ilone The PPf: ::Ilso recognized the issue
::IS h::lving imp::lcts countywide ::Ind proposed ::In ::Imendment to the "Rules f:onceming the
AdministrMion of the f:ountywide Futme L::Ind TTse Pl::ln" (f:ountywide Pl::ln Rules) thM would
en::lhle municip::llities the opportunity to ::Idopt ::IltemMive density ::Ind intensity st::lnd::lrds for
hotels in cert::lin futme l::lnd use cMegories Following extensive discussions ::Ind modificMions
the f:ountywide Pl::lnning Authority (f:PA) eventu::llly ::Ipproved the ::IltemMive density propOS::l!
on Octoher 16 2007 vi::l Pinell::ls f:ounty Ordin::lnce No 07-50 The ::Illow::lhle
densities/intensities~ however~ did not ::Ichieve tme economic p::lrity ::Ind encom::lged resorts ::Ind
not the mid-size~ mid-priced hotels thM f:le::lrwMer Re::lch h::ls lost
While the DestinMion Resort Density Pool creMed hy Reach hy Design h::ls heen
successtlll in incentivizing resorts such ::IS the S::Ind Pe::ld the Aqu::lle::l ::Ind the Kir::ln Gr::lnde~ the
f:ity needs to Mtr::lct other types of hotels in order to provide ::I v::lriety of tomist f::lcilities ::Ind
rem::lin competitive in the tourist m::lrket Since the Pinell::ls Pl::lnning f:ouncil's f:ountywide
Futme L::Ind TTse M::Ip designMes f:le::lrwMer Re::lch ::IS ::I f:ommunity Redevelopment District the
f:ity h::ls the option to h::lve density provisions thM ::Ire different thM those set forth in The Rules
rnncerning the Administratinn nfthe rnuntywide Future [,and Use Plan The f:ity h::ls opted to
pmsue density incre::lses thM would g(lin economic p::lrity in hopes of f::lcilitMing new mid-size~
mid-priced hotels
The f:ity hired DKS & AssociMes to conduct ::I tr::lffic ::In::llysis in order to determine whM
density could he ::Ichieved on f:le::lrwMer Re::lch while m::lint::lining the est::lhlished Level of
Service (T ,oS) for tr::lnsportMion concurrency The study determined thM the densities needed to
::Ichieve tme economic p::lrity would degr::lde the T,OS for the tr::lnsportMion network helow thM
::Illowed hy the f:le::lrwMer f:omprehensive Pl::ln Therefore~ ::Iddition::ll scen::lrios were
undert::lken ::Ind it W::lS suhsequently determined thM f:le::lrwMer Re::lch could support ::In
::Iddition::ll 1 ]R5 hotel rooms or ::In ::Icross-the-ho::lrd density of 90 hotel rooms per ::Icre
However~ since this density fell short creMing the economic p::lrity desired the f:ity deteffilined
thM it could hetter meet its gO::l1 of f::lcilitMing the mid-size~ mid-priced hotel hy c::lpturing this
- 3 -
Ordinance 7925-08, Eltaml 'fA'19
Attachment number 2
Page 4 of 6
development potenti::ll into ::I reserve ::Ind ::IllocMing those reserved hotel rooms on ::I p::lrcel-hy-
p::lrcel h::lsis This ::Ippro::lch would ::Ilso ::Illow the typic::ll 120-room mid-size~ mid-price hotel to
he constmcted on sm::lller properties
Hotel industry somces h::lve indicMed thM 120 is ::I pr::lctic::ll minimum for the numher of
hotel rooms thM would he required in order to creMe ::I successful ::Ind profit::lhle mid-size~ mid-
priced hotel For C:le::lrwMer Re::lch thM would me::ln ::In ::Issemhly of roughly 2 4 ::Icres under the
current regulMory stmcture Given the urh::ln nMure of C:le::lrwMer Re::lch ::IS well ::IS the extent to
which the existing p::lrcels of l::lnd ::Ire configured or "hroken-up"~ the ::Issemhl::lge of::l p::lrcel of
l::lnd l::lrge enough to generMe 120 rooms M the current h::lse density or under the CP A ::Ipproved
::IlternMives~ is very unlikely On ::Iver::lge~ hetween three ::Ind five sep::lrMe p::lrcels would need to
he ::Icquired to ::Im::lss just one ::Icre of l::lnd ::Ind M le::lst ten p::lrcels would need to he ::Icquired to
::Im::lss three ::Icres of l::lnd ::Ind in most scen::lrios some segment of those ten p::lrcels would he
sep::lrMed from the h::ll::lnce hy ::I right-of-w::lY: therehy m::lking the development of::l hotel difficult
M hest
Tn order to overcome the constr::lints upon hotel development on C:le::lrwMer Re::lch due to
the economic disp::lrity with condominium development ::IS well ::IS to f::lcilitMe the restorMion of
those lost mid-size~ mid-priced hotels~ Re::lch hy Design est::lhlishes ::I Hotel Density Reserve
(Reserve) of 1 ]R5 hotel rooms
The ::IllocMion of hotel rooms from the Reserve sh::lll he m::lde through the ::Ipprov::ll of::l
development ::Igreement with the C:ity of C:le::lrwMer with s::lid ::IllocMion heing strictly controlled
Tn order to he eligihle to dr::lw units from the Hotel Density Reserve~ ::I development would h::lve
to incorporMe~ meet ::Ind/or ::Ihide hy e::lch of the following-
.:. Those properties ::Ind/or developments thM h::lve ::Icquired density from the DestinMion Resort
Density Pool ::Ire not eligihle to h::lve rooms ::IllocMed from the Reserve'
~
.:. Those properties ::Ind/or developments thM h::lve h::ld density tr::lnsferred off to ::Inother
property ::Ind/or development(s) through ::In ::Ipproved Tr::lnsfer of Development Rights (TDR)
::IpplicMion hy the C:ity ::Ifter Decemher 11 ~ 2007 ::Ire not eligihle to h::lve rooms ::IllocMed
from the Reserve'
~
.:. A m::lximum of 100 hotel rooms m::lY he ::IllocMed from the Reserve to ::Iny development with
::I lot size less th::ln 25 ::Icres Those developments with ::I lot size greMer th::ln or equ::ll to 2 5
::Icres m::lY use the Reserve to ::Ichieve ::I density of 90 hotel rooms per ::Icre However~ in no
inst::lnce sh::lll the density of::l p::lrcel of l::lnd exceed 175 units per ::Icre reg::lrdless of whether
it h::ls received henefit oftr::lnsfers of development rights in ::Iddition to the Reserve~ or not:
.:. Accessory uses inconsistent with ::Imenities typic::ll of ::I mid-priced hotel sh::lll require
compli::lnce with the h::lse FAR requirements of the Resort F::Icilities High (RFH) Futme L::Ind
T J se cMegory:
.:. No hotel room ::IllocMed from the Reserve m::lY he converted to ::I residenti::lluse (i e Mt::lched
dwelling):
- 4 -
Ordinance 7925-08, Eltaml 'fA'19
Attachment number 2
Page 5 of 6
.:. The m::lXlmUm huilding heights of the v::lrious ch::lr::lcter districts c::lnnot he incre::lsed to
::IccommodMe hotel rooms ::IllocMed from the Reserve'
~
.:. When hoth the ::IllocMion of hotel rooms from the Reserve ::Ind the tr::lnsfer of development
rights (TDR) ::Ire utilized ::IS p::lrt of::l development only hotel rooms hrought in to the project
through the TDR process ::Ire eligihle to he constmcted ::Ihove the otherwise m::lximum
huilding height hut only provided thM ::111 TDR criteri::l ::Ire met:
.:. A leg::llly enforce::lhle m::lndMory eV::lcuMion/closme coven::lnt thM the overnight
::IccommodMion use will he closed ::IS soon ::IS pr::lctic::lhle ::Ifter::l hmric::lne wMch thM includes
f:le::lrwMer Re::lch is posted hy the NMion::ll Hmric::lne f:enter:
.:. Access to overnight ::IccommodMion units must he provided through ::I lohhy ::Ind intern::ll
corri d ors .
~
.:. All hotel rooms oht::lined from the Reserve thM ::Ire not constmcted sh::lll he returned to the
Reserve'
~
.:. The development sh::lll comply with the Metropolit::ln Pl::lnning Org::lnizMion's (MPO)
countywide ::Ippro::lch to the ::IpplicMion of concurrency m::ln::lgement for tr::lnsportMion
f::lcilities~ ::Ind the tr::lnsportMion ::In::llysis conducted for the development sh::lll include the
following-
· Recognition of st::lnd::lrd dM::I somces ::IS est::lhlished hy the MPO:
· TdentificMion of level of service (LOS) st::lnd::lrds for stMe ::Ind county ro::lds::ls est::lhlished
hy the MPO:
· TTtilizMion of proportion ::II f::lir-sh::lre requirements consistent with Florid::l StMues ::Ind the
MPO model ordin::lnce'
~
· TTtilizMion of the MPO Tr::lffic Tmp::lct Study Methodology: ::Ind
· Recognition of the MPO designMion of "f:onstr::lined F::Icilities" ::IS set forth in the most
cmrent MPO Annu::ll Level of Service Report
.:. A reserv::ltion system sh::lll he required ::IS ::In integr::ll p::lrt of the hotel use ::Ind there sh::lll he ::I
lohhy/front desk ::Ire::l thM must he operMed ::IS ::I typic::ll lohhy/front desk ::Ire::l for ::I hotel
would he operMed: ::Ind
.:. The hooks ::Ind records pert::lining to use of e::lch hotel room sh::lll he open for inspection hy
::Iuthorized representMives of the f:ity~ upon re::lson::lhle notice~ in order to confirm
compli::lnce with these regJllMions ::IS ::Illowed hy gener::lll::lw
AMENDMENT 2 - BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR
CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES, SECTION VII. DESIGN
GUIDELINES
Amend Subsection A. Density on page 64 as follows:
- 5 -
Ordinance 7925-08, Eltaml 'fA'19
Attachment number 2
Page 6 of 6
* * * * *
Historically the maximum permitted density for overnight accommodation uses has been
40 units per acre. In order to assist in the redevelopment of Clearwater Beach, the maximum
permitted density in Beach by Design shall be 50 units per acre. * It also allows this maximum
density of 50 units per acre to be exceeded through the ::IllocMion of units from the DestinMion
Resort Density Pool~ the ::IllocMion of units from the Hotel Density Reserve~ ::Ind the use ofTDRs
from other properties located within the Clearwater Beach Community Redevelopment District
in compliance with the following provisions:
* * * * *
Beach by Design also supports the allocation of additional density for resort development
through the density pool DestinMion Resort Density Pool established in Section V.B~ of this
plan~ ::IS well ::IS the ::111 ocMi on of ::Iddition::ll density for mid-price hotel s through the Hotel Density
Reserve est::lhlished in Section V R 2 of this pl::ln. The maximum permitted floor area ratio for
nonresident development is limited to 1.0 pursuant to the Pinellas County Planning Council
intensity standards.
* * * * *
Amend Subsection B. Height on page 65 as follows:
* * * * *
to
* * * * *
- 6 -
Ordinance 7925-08, Eltaml 'fA'19
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 5
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Ordinance No.:
Agenda Item:
March 18, 2008
Amendments to Beach by Design
7925-08
H. 2.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST:
Amendments to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach
and Design Guidelines
INITIA TED BY:
City of Clearwater Planning Department
BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS:
In 2001 the City adopted Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design
Guidelines. This special area plan set forth a series of revitalization strategies for Clearwater Beach and
established eight distinct character districts to regulate land use, location of uses and generally the scale of
development. Beach by Design also established a pool of 600 hotel rooms that were to be made available
to certain specifically designated properties in order to stimulate desired catalytic resort projects.
While this pool was successful in stimulating desired resort projects such as Sand Pearl, Aqualea, and
Kiran Grande, Clearwater Beach still suffered a loss of numerous mid-size, mid-priced hotel rooms to a
thriving condominium market from 2002 until 2006/07, and the loss of these rooms became a significant
issue for both Clearwater Beach and the City as a whole.
The loss of hotel rooms was due, in part, to the relationship between land costs for hotels and land costs
for condominiums. A study prepared by Dr. Owen Beitsch in October 2006, found that a one-acre
property purchased for $1,000,000 for condominium development requires a much lower density and
provides a much greater return on investment than does the same property purchased for the same price,
but for a hotel development. The return on investment for a condominium is also immediate, whereas a
hotel returns its investment slowly over a longer period of time.
While the condominium market is no longer as strong as it has been, the past demand for condominium
product has driven land value so disproportionately high that hotels cannot economically compete under
the current comprehensive plan and land development regulations. Current land valuations and caps on
densities, in tandem with existing operations that generate adequate revenues, have created a situation
where land costs have made new hotel development prohibitive absent some focused intervention that
brings values more in line with those needed to support new development. In short, it has been
determined that if the existing hotel stock on Clearwater Beach is to be revitalized then densities that
invite reinvestment are needed.
Dr. Beitsch's study further indicated that condominium development could support on average a land
value that is seven times higher per unit than hotel development. Accordingly, hotels would need roughly
5 to 7 rooms for every condominium unit in order to compete with potential condominium development
in terms of economic viability. Based upon the existing density for condominiums at 30 units per acre,
hotels would require a density of between 150 and 210 rooms per acre to be an economically viable
alternative to condominiums.
Community Development Board - March l8, 2008
Amendments to Beach by Design - Page 1
Item # 19
Attachment number 3
Page 2 of 5
While the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA) amended the Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywide Future Land Use Plan (Countywide Plan Rules) adopting alternative density and
intensity standards for hotels in certain future land use categories, those amendments would only provide
approximately 2.5 to 4.1 hotel rooms for every condominium unit, dependant upon the size of the subject
property. As stated previously, Dr. Beitsch's study found that hotel density must be 5 to 7 times that of
condominium density; therefore the amendment to the Countywide Plan Rules would not adequately
address the issue of economic parity.
As Clearwater Beach is designated as a Community Redevelopment District on the Pinellas Planning
Council's Countywide Future Land Use Map, the City has the option to have different density provisions
from those set forth in the Countywide Plan Rules. Therefore, the City hired DKS & Associates to
conduct a traffic analysis in order to determine the maximum density that could be achieved within the
established Level of Service (LOS) standards for the transportation network. The study revealed that
upon excluding those properties where it can be safely assumed that redevelopment is unlikely, and those
properties where approved development proposals already exist; approximately 18 acres of land has a
reasonable potential for redevelopment under a higher maximum density for hotel use. The study further
assumed that an additional 7.57 acres ofland had potential for residential (condominium) redevelopment
at a density of 30 dwelling units per acre, and that an increase of 30,000 square feet of commercial floor
area could occur.
Based upon these assumptions, hotel development at the highest density necessary to achieve economic
parity (210 rooms per acre), when added to the traffic associated with the existing and approved
development trips, would result in the overburdening of the existing transportation infrastructure. Further
analysis concluded that an across-the-board density of 90 hotel rooms per acre could be accommodated
given the performance of minor mitigation/improvements to the existing transportation infrastructure.
While, increasing hotel density to 90 rooms per acre for all properties within Beach by Design would
provide a substantial increase upon existing hotel density, this would only result in an increase that would
provide three hotel rooms for every condominium unit and the prescribed economic parity would not be
achieved. Therefore, it is proposed to capture the development potential that could exist between 50 and
90 hotel rooms per acre (1,385 hotel rooms) within a Hotel Density Reserve that could be allocated on a
project-by-project basis to enable hotel development to achieve economic parity and to provide for the
development of new mid-size, mid-priced hotels.
The allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve would be made by approval of the City Council as part of
a development agreement with those allocations being strictly controlled. In order to be eligible to draw
units from the Reserve, a development would have to incorporate, meet, and/or abide by several criteria,
which are set forth in full in the attached ordinance, and a selection of those criteria follows:
.:. Those properties and/or developments that have acquired density from the Destination Resort Density
Pool are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve.
.:. Those properties and/or developments that have had density transferred off to another property and/or
development(s) through an approved Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application by the City
after December 31,2007, are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve.
.:. The lot size of the subject property must be at least 0.75 acres (32,670 square feet).
Community Development Board - March l8, 2008
Amendments to Beach by Design - Page 2
Item # 19
Attachment number 3
Page 3 of 5
.:. A maximum of 100 hotel rooms may be allocated from the Reserve to any development with a lot
size between 0.75 and 2.5 acres. Those developments with a lot size greater than 2.5 acres may use
the Reserve to achieve the difference between 50 and 90 hotel rooms per acre.
.:. Accessory uses inconsistent with amenities typical of a mid-priced hotel shall require compliance
with the base FAR requirements of the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category.
.:. The maximum building heights of the various character districts cannot be increased to accommodate
hotel rooms allocated from the Reserve.
.:. When both the allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve and the transfer of development rights
(TDR) are utilized as part of a development, only hotel rooms brought in to the project through the
TDR process are eligible to be constructed above the otherwise maximum building height, but only
provided that all TDR criteria are met.
In addition to the above, the existing capacity and demand for both potable water and wastewater was
examined and a determination was made that no capacity issues are anticipated with either. The City's
average consumption of potable water is 13 MGD (million gallons per day), and the City has facilities
that can produce 4 MGD with the balance of the potable water service being provided from Tampa Bay
Water via interconnects with Pinellas County, and there is no cap on the agreement for purchased water.
The recent peak historic flow (past five years) for wastewater is 20.04 MGD and the City has a
wastewater capacity of approximately 28.5 MGD. It is further noted, however, that some wastewater
system improvements will be needed at some point, but the costs associated with those improvements
would have to be born by the private sector.
Attached with this staff report is the proposed Ordinance No. 7925-08, which amends Beach by Design to
clarify all references to the existing "pool" as referring to the Destination Resort Density Pool, to clarify
the existing increased height provisions and their relationship to the Destination Resort Density Pool, and
to establish the Hotel Density Reserve and its associated criteria. Within the ordinance document, text
that is underlined indicates proposed language and text containing strikcthroughs indicate deletions.
CRITERIA FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS:
Community Development Code Section 4-601 sets forth the procedures and criteria for reviewing text
amendments. All text amendments must comply with the following:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Below is a selected list of goals, objectives and policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan that
are furthered by the proposed amendments to Beach by Design:
Objective 1.2
Population densities (included in the Coastal Management Element and the Future
Land Use Map) in coastal areas are restricted to the maximum density allowed by
the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, except for specific
areas identified in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach
and Design Guidelines, and shall be consistent with the Pinellas County Hurricane
Evacuation Plan and the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Plan and shall be
maintained or decreased.
Community Development Board - March l8, 2008
Amendments to Beach by Design - Page 3
Item # 19
Goal 2
Objective 2.1
Policy 2.1.1
Policy 5.1.1
Attachment number 3
Page 4 of 5
The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and
engineering practices, and urban design standards in order to protect historic
resources, ensure neighborhood preservation, redevelop blighted areas, and
encourage infill development.
The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or obsolete areas shall
be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and
special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment,
and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards.
Redevelopment shall be encouraged, where appropriate, by providing development
incentives such as density bonuses for significant lot consolidation and/or catalytic
projects, as well as the use of transfer of developments rights pursuant to approved
special area plans and redevelopment plans.
No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of
City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage
treatment, garbage collection, and drainage) to fall below minimum acceptable
levels. However, development orders may be phased or otherwise modified
consistent with provisions of the concurrency management system to allow
services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development.
In addition to the above, the following objective and policies are proposed with the companion
Ordinance No. 7924-08, which amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. These would also be
furthered by the proposed amendments to the Beach by Design:
Objective 2.6
Policy 2.6.1
Policy 2.6.2
Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City
shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important
economic sector.
The City supports and encourages the continued development and redevelopment
of overnight accommodation uses.
The City supports the adoption of higher density/intensity standards for overnight
accommodation uses such that a sufficient supply shall be available within the
City provided that concurrency standards are met.
2. The proposed amendment furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City
ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan.
The proposed amendment to Beach by Design will further the purposes of the Community
Development Code in that it will be consistent with the following purposes set forth in CDC Section
1-103 :
o Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative
redevelopment (CDC Section 1-103.B.1).
o Strengthening the City's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole (CDC Section 1-
103.B.3).
Community Development Board - March l8, 2008
Amendments to Beach by Design - Page 4
Item # 19
Attachment number 3
Page 5 of 5
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDA nON:
The proposed amendment to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design
Guidelines are consistent with and furthers the goals of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and the
purposes of the Community Development Code. Further, the proposed amendment will assist in
overcoming the constraints upon hotel development on Clearwater Beach due to the economic disparity
with condominium development, as well as facilitating the restoration of lost mid-size, mid-priced hotels.
The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 7925-08 that amends Beach by
Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
o Ordinance No. 7925-08
o Beach Area Tratlic Study
o White Paper of August 2007
S:\Planning DepartmentlBEACH BY DES1GNlAMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DES1GNI2008 Hotel Density Reserve AmendmentlOrdinance No
7925-08200803-18 CDB Staff Report. doc
Community Development Board - March l8, 2008
Amendments to Beach by Design - Page 5
Item # 19
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve amendment to the Community Development Code to further the consistency between the Community Development Code and
the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and to make other minor editorial changes, and Pass Ordinance 7949-08 on first reading.
SUMMARY:
The Planning Department is recommending an amendment to the Community Development Code (CDC) to ensure consistency between
the CDC and the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment will add the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use
Plan category to the list of Countywide Future Land Use Plan Designations compatible with the Commercial (C) and High Density
Residential (HDR) Districts consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Ordinance No. 7949-08 contains information on the proposed amendment.
The Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed the proposed text amendment at its pubic hearing of March 18,2008, as part of a
larger text amendment (TA2008-0l00l/0rd. No. 7926-08). The CDB recommended the approval of the proposed amendment with no
comments.
Review Approval: 1) Legal 2) Clerk 3) Assistant City Manager 4) Clerk 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 20
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 3
ORDI NANCE NO. 7949-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, MAKING
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO
FURTHER THE CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AND THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN BY AMENDING
SECTION 2-501.1, "MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL",
REGARDING THE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT,
TO MODIFY THE ACCOMPANYING TABLE TO ADD THE RESORT
FACILITIES HIGH COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
AND TO PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE,
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO/IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO FOR
SAID DESIGNATION; AMENDING SECTION 2-701.1, "MAXIMUM
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL" REGARDING THE COMMERCIAL
ZONING DISTRICT, TO MODIFY THE ACCOMPANYING TABLE TO
ADD THE RESORT FACILITIES HIGH COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND
USE DESIGNATION AND TO PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE, MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO/IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE RATIO, AND OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS PER
ACRE FOR SAID DESIGNATION; CERTIFYING CONSISTENCY WITH
THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROPER
ADVERTISEMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVI 01 NG AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater adopted a new Community Development Code on
January 21, 1999 which was effective on March 8, 1999, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Community Development Code for consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has determined where the Community Development
Code needs clarification and revision, now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 5, "High Density Residential
District ("HDR")", Section 2-501.1, "Maximum development potential", of the Community
Development Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 2-501.1. Maximum development potential.
The High Density Residential District ("HDR") may be located in more than one land use
category. It is the intent of the HDR District that development be consistent with the Countywide
Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The development potential of a parcel of land
within the HDR District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as
well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the HDR District as follows:
Countywide Future Land Use Designation Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre Maximum Floor Area Ratio/Impervious
of Land Surface Ratio
Residential High 30 dwelling units per acre FAR .60/ISR .85
Item # 20
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 3
I Resort Facilities High
I 30 dwelling units per acre
I FAR 1.0/ISR .95
Section 2. That Article 2, "Zoning Districts", Division 7, "Commercial District ("C")",
Section 2-701.1, "Maximum development potential", of the Community Development Code, be,
and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 2-701.1. Maximum development potential.
The Commercial District ("C") may be located in more than one land use category. It is
the intent of the C District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use
Plan as required by State law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the C District
shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the
Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. Development potential for the
Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the C District are as follows:
Countywide Future Land Maximum Dwelling Units Maximum Floor Area Ratio Maximum Overnight
Use Designation per Acre of Land / Impervious Suiface Ratio Accommodations Units Per Acre
Commercial Neighborhood lO dwelling units per acre FAR AO/ISR .80 N/A
Commercial Limited l8 dwelling units per acre FAR A5/ISR .85 30 units per acre
Commercial General 24 dwelling units per acre FAR .55/ISR .95 40 units per acre
Residential/Office/Relail l8 dwelling units per acre FAR AO/ISR .85 30 units per acre
Resort Facilities High 30 dwelling units per acre FAR 1.0/ISR .95 50 units per acre
Section 3. Amendments to the Community Development Code of the City of
Clearwater (as originally adopted by Ordinance No. 6348-99 and subsequently amended) are
hereby adopted to read as set forth in this Ordinance.
Section 4. The City of Clearwater does hereby certify that the amendments
contained herein, as well as the provisions of this Ordinance, are consistent with and in
conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Section 5. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 6. Notice of the proposed enactment of this Ordinance has been properly
advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with applicable law.
Section 7.
This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Approved as to form:
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Attest:
Item # 20
Leslie Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 3
Item # 20
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Appoint councilmembers as representatives on Regional and Miscellaneous Boards.
SUMMARY:
Regional and Miscellaneous Boards
2008 Appointments
Board (Date/Time of Meeting)
Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC)
(2nd Monday - 10:00 a.m.)
Delegate
Petersen
Mayor's Council of Pinellas County
(1st Wednesday - 11:30 a.m.)
Hibbard
Barrier Island Governmental Council
(4th Wednesday - 9:00 a.m. -location TBA for each meeting)
Cretekos
Doran - All.
Tampa Bay Partnership Board of Governors
(as called)
Hibbard
Tampa Bay Partnership Policy Board
(bi-monthly - 9:00 a.m.)
Hibbard
Tampa Bay Estuary Policy Board
(Quarterly - 1:30 p.m.)
Councilmember highly recommended
Gibson
Homeless Leadership Network
Petersen
Doran
Courtney Campbell Scenic Highway Citizen Advisory Committee
(3rd Friday - 11 :00 a.m.)
Doran
Area Agency on Aging of PascolPinellas
(bi-monthly - 1 :30 p.m. 2nd Monday)
Kerry Kimball
Office on Aging
Mgr
Pinellas Collaborative Committee
(1st Wednesday - 9:00 a.m.)
Cretekos
School Transportation Safety Committee
Cretekos
The following Boards have the specific term expiration date noted:
Pinellas County Economic Development Council
(term expires 7/31/2009, two-year term)
Cretekos
Pinellas Planning Council (PPC)
(3rd Wednesday - 9:00 a.m.)
(term expires 12/31/2008, two-year term)
Doran
Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A)
(4th Wednesday - 9:00 a.m.)
(term expires 9/30/2009, three-year term)
Gibson
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
Hibbard
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Cover Memo
Item # 21
(2nd Wednesday - 1:00 p.m.)
(term expires 9/11/2009, four-year term)
Sister Cities Advisory Board
(term expires 12/31/2010, four-year term)
Petersen
Pension Advisory Committee (PAC)
(2nd Thursday - 9:00 a.m.)
(two-year term)
Petersen
4/4/2009
Gibson
4/4/2008
Doran
4/4/2008
Appointments by other entities
Downtown Development Board Ex-Officio Members
(CRA Trustees)
Petersen
Doran
Convention Visitors Bureau (CVB)
(County makes appointment)
Petersen
WorkNet Pinellas Board
(term expires 6/30/2009, two-year term)
Cretekos
U.S. Conference of Mayors
Hibbard
Florida Conference of Mayors (FLC)
Hibbard
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 21
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance No. 7927-08 on second reading, amending Section 33.059(3), Code of Ordinances, relating to waterways and vessels
at City owned public docs.
SUMMARY:
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 22
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 7927-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 33, SECTION 33.059 (3), CODE OF
ORDINANCES, RELATING TO WATERWAYS AND VESSELS, TO
DEFINE THE LENGTH OF STAY FOR VESSELS AT CITY OWNED
PUBLIC DOCKS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section 33.059 is amended to read:
Sec. 33.059. Prohibited mooring, beaching or placing of vessels.
(1) No vessel of any kind whatsoever shall moor to or tie up to a private seawall or dock or be
beached upon private property within the city limits without the permission of the owner
thereof.
(2) No vessel shall be moored or otherwise placed in such a manner as to impede, restrict, or
otherwise interfere with the use of public docks, launching ramps or other public waterfront
facilities.
(3) No vessel shall be permitted to occupy the City-owned Island Way Grill non-leased public
dock slips durinq the period each niqht between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., except in an
emerqency as authorized by the City Harbor Master. The Harbor Master will determine
whether the circumstance constitutes an emerqency.
(4) No vessel shall be permitted to occupy the City-owned Recreation Center (Sand Pear!),
non-leased portion of the public dock slips durinq the period each niqht between 10:00 p.m.
and 8:00 a.m., except in an emerqency as authorized by the City Harbor Master. The Harbor
Master will determine whether the circumstance constitutes an emerqency.
~ @.LVessels in violation of this section shall be subject to a fine, possible removal or
impoundment by the City, and costs incident thereto shall be borne by the owner.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Camilo A. Soto
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Item # 22
Ordinance No. 7927-08
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance No. 7947-08 on second reading, amending Ordinance No. 7372-05, which vacated a portion of the easterly one-half of
the 70-foot right-of-way of Gulfview Boulevard (AKA South Gulfview Boulevard), subject to special conditions; amending the
conditions by extending the date for vertical construction to March 31, 201 0 and requiring demolition and removal of existing structures
on the project site by October 31, 2008.
SUMMARY:
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 23
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7947-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 7372-05, WHICH
VACATED A PORTION OF THE EASTERLY ONE-HALF OF
THE 70-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GULFVIEW
BOULEVARD, (AK.A SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD
PER FIELD), SUBJECT TO SPECIAL CONDITIONS;
EXTENDING THE REQUIRED DATE FOR
COMMENCEMENT OF VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, in Ordinance No. 7372-05, the City of Clearwater vacated the right-of-
way depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto, subject to certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the request of K and P Clearwater Estate, LLC, the
"Developer," the City Council finds that it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City
and the general public to amend the conditions of the vacation; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following:
A parcel of land being a part of Gulf View Boulevard, as depicted on the plat of Columbia
Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 60, of the
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and being a part of said Gulf View Boulevard,
as depicted on the plat of L1oyd-White-Skinner Subdivision, according to plat thereof, as
recorded in Plat Book 13, Pages 12 and 13, of the Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida, all lying in the east % of Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 15 east, Pinellas
County, Florida, and more fully described in the legal description Exhibit "A" attached
hereto;
Together with a parcel of land being a part of Gulf View Boulevard, as depicted on the
plat of Columbia Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 23,
Page 60, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, lying in the east % of
Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, and the west % of Section 8, Township
29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and more fully described in the legal
description Exhibit "B" attached hereto, are hereby vacated, subject to the following
conditions:
1) The project described within the Development Agreement between the City of
Clearwater and K & P Clearwater Estate, LLC ("Development Agreement")
shall commence vertical construction
Ordinance NoI.tem7~M23
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 2
public and private utilities shall be relocated by K & P Clearwater Estate,
LLC at its own expense and to the approval and acceptance of the utility
owners with all out of service utilities removed prior to the completion of the
project.
public vehicular and pedestrian use of the subject right of way shall be
maintained until such time as a suitable paved roadway is constructed to the
west of the subject right of way to accommodate two lanes of two way traffic
capacity.
of the Developer's pro rata share of the Beach Walk Construction
as identified in the Development Agreement.
vacation ordinance shall be rendered null and void if any of the
preceding conditions are not met.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Pamela K. Akin
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Ordinance NoI.tem7~M23
Attachment number 2
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT "A"
ORDINANCE 7947-08
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, AS
DEPICTED ON THE PLAT OF COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 60, OF THE
PUBIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING A PART
OF SAID GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, AS DEPICTED ON THE PLAT OF LLOYD-
WHITE -SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALL LYING IN THE EAST % OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BELOW:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 44, OF SAID LLOYD-
WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION: THENCE S.05032'30"W. ALONG THE EAST
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 90.06 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 44; THENCE S.05032'30"W., A
DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 48, OF
AFORESAID LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION; THENCE
S.05032'30"W., ALONG AFORESAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID GULF
VIEW BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 154.95 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID
EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF
160.45 FEET; THENCE N.84027'30"W., A DISTANCE OF 34.98 FEET; THENCE
N.05032'30"E. ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID GULF VIEW BOULEVARD,
A DISTANCE OF 456.33 FEET; THENCE S.41 o28'18"E., A DISTANCE OF 16.55
FEET; THENCE S.05029'40"W., A DISTANCE OF 0.58 FEET; THENCE
S.84030'20"E., A DISTANCE OF 6.00 FEET; THENCE N.05029'40"E., A
DISTANCE OF 18.97 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE N.05029'40"E., A DISTANCE
OF 1.03 FEET; THENCE N.41000'13"W., A DISTANCE OF 17.95 FEET;
THENCE N.48031'37"E., A DISTANCE OF 14.15 FEET; THENCE N.90000'00''E.,
A DISTANCE OF 34.32 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG AFORESAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 34.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 26.87 FEET, A CHORD OF 26.18 FEET
AND A CHORD BEARING OF S.28011'29"W.; THENCE S.05032'30"W. ALONG
SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF
0.88 FEET; THENCE N.90000'00''W., ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF
AFORESAID LOT 44, A DISTANCE OF 3.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 16687.11 SQUARE FEET OR 0.38 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Item # 23
Attachment number 3
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT "B"
ORDINANCE 7947-08
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, AS
DEPICTED ON THE PLAT OF COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO HE
PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 60, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING IN THE EAST %
OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, AND THE WEST %
OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 44, OF LLOYD-
WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED ON PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 12 AND 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N.90000'00''E., ALONG THE
NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 44, A DISTANCE OF 3.82 FEET; THENCE
N.05032'30"E. ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID
GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 0.88 FEET TO POINT OF A
CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD BEING A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 34.00, AN ARC OF 26.87 FEET, A CHORD OF 26.18 FEET, AND A
CHORD BEARING OF N.28011 '29"E. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
N90000'00''W., A DISTANCE OF 29.08 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT
CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 112.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 102.51 FEET, A CHORD OF
98.97 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF N.63052'46"E.; THENCE
S.89054'00"E., A DISTANCE OF 79.18 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
40.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 61.30 FEET; A CHORD OF 55.47 FEET AND A CHORD
BEARING S.45059'54'E. TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVE; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF=-WAY OF AFORESAID
GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 28.66 FEET, AN ARC OF 11.98 FEET, A CHORD OF 11.89 FEET AND A
CHORD BEARING N7r55'43"W.; THENCE N.8954'00"W. ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GULF VIEW BOULDVARD, A DISTANCE OF
145.71 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE WESTERLL Y ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-ASY OF AFORESAID GULF VIEW BOULEVARD
BEING A CURVE TO THE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 34.00
FEET, AN ARC OF 23.30 FEET, A CHORD OF 22.84 FEET AND A CHORD
BEARING OF S.70027'47''W.TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 6256.56 SQUARE FEET OR 0.1436 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Item # 23
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance No. 7948-08 on second reading, amending Ordinance No. 7371-05, as amended by Ordinance No. 7598-06, which
vacated a portion of the 60-foot right-of-way of First Avenue (AKA First Street per field) subject to special conditions; amending the
conditions by extending the date for vertical construction to March 31, 201 0 and requiring demolition and removal of existing structures
on the project site by October 31, 2008.
SUMMARY:
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 24
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 7948-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 7371-05 AS
AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 7598-06, WHICH
VACATED A PORTION OF THE 60-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF FIRST AVENUE, (AKA FIRST STREET PER FIELD),
SUBJECT TO SPECIAL CONDITIONS TO AMEND THE
SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, in Ordinance No. 7371-05, the City of Clearwater vacated the right-of-
way depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto, subject to certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 7371-05 was amended by Ordinance No. 7598-06 to
extend the date for commencement of vertical construction to March 3, 2008; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the request of K and P Clearwater Estate, LLC, the
"Developer," the City Council finds that it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City
and the general public to amend the conditions of the vacation; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That Section 1 of Ordinance No. 7371-05 is hereby amended to read
as follows:
The following:
Vacate a portion of the 60-foot right-of-way of First Avenue, (AKA First Street per
field), the plat of L1oyd-White-Skinner Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 13,
Page 12 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly
described as: From the southwest corner of Lot 55, L1oyd-White-Skinner
Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 12 of the Official Records of
Pinellas County, Florida, run thence N05032'30"E along the easterly right of way
line of Gulf View Boulevard as shown on said plat a distance of 335.00 feet to the
Point of Beginning, said point also being the northwest corner of Lot 48 of said
Lloyd White Skinner subdivision, thence N05032'30"E 60.00 feet to the southwest
corner of Lot 44, L1oyd-White-Skinner Subdivision; thence S84027'30"E along the
northerly right of way line of First Avenue, L1oyd-White-Skinner Subdivision a
distance of 192.00 feet; thence S05032'30"W along a line 18 feet west of and
parallel with the westerly right of way line of Coronado Avenue as shown on the
plat of L1oyd-White-Skinner Subdivision a distance of 60.00 feet to the southerly
right of way line of said First Avenue; thence N84027'30"W along said southerly
right of way line a distance of 192.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, subject to the
following conditions:
Ordinance NoI.tem8#Ja24
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 2
1) The project described within the Development Agreement between the
City of Clearwater and K and P Clearwater Estate, LLC adopted by
Resolution 04-39 and as thereafter amended, (the Development
Agreement") shall commence vertical construction by no later than
March 3,2010.
2) Developer shall demolish and remove existing structures on the project
site by October 31, 2008.
3) All public and private utilities shall be relocated the Developer at its own
expense and to the approval and acceptance of the utility owners with
all out of service utilities removed prior to the completion of the project,
4) This vacation shall become effective only after the Developer grants the
60-foot right of way for Relocated First Street to the City as provided in
the Development Agreement.
5) Payment by the Developer of the cost of construction of the relocated
First Street or the posting of security sufficient to guarantee construction
of the relocated First Street as provided in the Development Agreement.
4) This vacation ordinance shall be rendered null and void if any of the preceding
conditions are not met.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Pamela K. Akin
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
2
Ordinance NoI.tem8#Ja24
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Continue Second reading of Ordinance 7949-08 to May 1, 2008.
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 25
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize instituting a civil action on behalf of the City against Florida Power Corporation, and Florida Power Corporation d/b/a
Progress Energy Florida, Inc., to seek to recover costs and expenses incurred during the construction of improvements on Myrtle
Avenue. (consent)
SUMMARY:
During the Myrtle Avenue reconstruction project from 2003 to its completion in 2006, Progress Energy failed to resolve conflicts with
existing above ground utilites and buried utilities in a timely manner during the reconstruction process. As a result the City was required
to expend funds to compensate the contractor for time delays, redesign, and additional work. The total amount claimed against Progress
Energy is $464,082.17.
The legal department requests authority to bring a legal action against Florida Power Corporation, and Florida Power Corporation d/b/a
Progress Energy Florida, Inc. (including all other subsidiaries and related corporations as necessary to obtain relief), to recover damages
for the additional costs and expenses incurred by the City.
The costs relative to this action will include a $255.00 filing fee and fees for service of process of approximately $200.00.
Type:
Current Year Budget?:
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:
Not to Exceed:
For Fiscal Year:
Operating Expenditure
Yes
Budget Adjustment:
No
$455.00
Annual Operating Cost:
Total Cost:
$455.00
$455.00
10/01107 to 09/30/08
Appropriation Code
010-09600- 548000- 514-
000-0000
Bid Required?:
Other Bid / Contract:
Amount
$455.00
Appropriation Comment
No
Bid Number:
Bid Exceptions:
None
Review Approval: 1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 26
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Crest Lake Park
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 27
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Marine Advisory Board
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 28
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Work Net Pinellas' Summer Career Institute - Councilmember Cretekos
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 29
Attachment number 1
Page 1 of 3
City Of S1. Petersburg
Letter Proposal
Purchasing and Materials Management
RE: 924-86 Training, Youth Workplace Readiness
RFP No. dated April 4, 2008
The City of S1. Petersburg is requesting proposals from qualified offerors who provide career
exploration and workplace readiness training for S1. Petersburg youths.
Proposals must be delivered, one hard copy original and 3 compact disc ("COli) copies, by 5:00 p.m.,
Tuesday, April 22, 2008 to:
Louis Moore, CPPO
Director, Purchasing and
Materials Management
City of S1. Petersburg
One 4th Street North, 5th FL
S1. Petersburg, FL 33701
Proposals must be marked "RFP No. 924-86 Training, Youth Workplace Readiness". Said
proposals must conform to the requirements outlined in the Letter Proposal. The City has the right to
reject any and all proposals and to waive minor informalities. The City will not pay any costs incurred
by any offerors in the preparation of proposals.
1. Technical Requirements/Statement of work
Offeror shall provide all labor, materials, facilities required to operate a summer youth
workplace readiness training program ("Program"). Offeror's Program must have at least a
five year track record of proven success in providing readiness training to youths and be
operated by a not-for-profit organization or governmental agency. Offeror's Program must
service youth who are residents of the City of S1. Petersburg and be designed with eligibility
requirements including a maximum household income stipulation.
2. Proposal Evaluation Criteria
The following criteria will be used to evaluate the proposals:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Experience
Qualifications
Proposal
References
Budgetary allocations
Rev (3/08)
Item # 29
Attachment number 1
Page 2 of 3
Letter Proposal
RFP No. xxxx dated xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Page 2
3. Submission
Section A. - Experience and Qualifications
Offerors must provide a company profile. Information provided must include:
a. Company ownership. If incorporated, the state in which the company is incorporated
and the date of incorporation.
b. Location of the company offices.
c. Location of the office servicing the St. Petersburg market.
d. Number of employees, both locally and nationally.
e. Name, address, and telephone number of the Offeror's point of contact for its
Program.
f. Company background/history and why Offeror is qualified to provide the services
described in this RFP.
g. Length of time Offeror has been providing the services described in this RFP. Please
provide a brief description.
h. Resumes for key staff to be responsible for providing Program services.
I. Offeror's bank of record.
J. Offeror must include in its proposal a complete disclosure of any prior or ongoing
significant civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending which involves the
Offerors or in which the Offerors has been judged guilty or liable.
k. Provide documentation of your firm's financial resources for providing Program
services and meeting financial obligations. (e.g., a copy of your firm's most recent
year's audited financial statement summaries and the notes to the financial
statement).
Section B. - References
Provide at least five references for services of similar size and scope completed within the
past three years. Include:
a. Client name;
b. Client address;
c. Project dates (starting and ending)
d. Service start and end dates;
e. Client project manager name, e-mail address and telephone number.
Section C - Technical Proposal
Submit a complete description of your Program that includes the following information:
a.
The length of your Program and the average number of participants who successfully
complete the training.
A description of how your youth workplace readiness Program is funded.
An explanation of what portion of Program funds goes to administration and what
portion goes to participants.
I nformation regarding the budgetary allocations for your Program as it relates to the
partici pants.
A description of the curriculum utilized for your program.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Rev (3/08)
Item # 29
Attachment number 1
Page 3 of 3
Letter Proposal
RFP No. xxxx dated xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Page 3
f. The guidelines utilized to determine eligibility of participants.
g. A description of reports that are available to financial supporters of your program
(include samples in your proposal).
h. Information related to participant successes for your Program during the past five
years.
I. Rewards and incentives offered to participants and how they are awarded.
J. A description of anyon-going services provided to participants who have
successfully completed your Program.
Section 0 - Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
In this section, list any exceptions taken to the terms, conditions or other requirements listed
in this RFP. You must reference the RFP section where exception is taken, a description of
the exception, and the proposed alternative, if any.
All questions are to be submitted in writing to Theresa Jordan, C.P.M., CPPB, Purchasing
Supervisor, at 727-892-5297, fax 727-892-5325 orvia e-mail to theresa.jordan@stpete.org no later
than 4:00 p.m., ET, Friday, April 18, 2008.
Late offers may be rejected.
Sincerely,
Louis Moore, CPPO
Director, Purchasing and
Materials Management
LM: Select Initials
Rev (3/08)
Item # 29
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Other Council Action
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 30
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Civitan Awareness Proclamation - Frank Kelly
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 31
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Clearwater Housing Authority Update - Robert Aude, Chairperson
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 32
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Distinguished Budget Presentation
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 33
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Proclamation: April 19 is Clearwater Poetry Day.
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 34
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Salvation Army Non-Profit Presentation - Major Hinson
SUMMARY:
Meeting Date:4/14/2008
Review Approval: 1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 35